The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC May 17, 1994 "~,v ,,~;I<" >'_. ;"\,,, 6 " r.'. ... -~ . ,. , , CITY of ANDOVER Regular city Council Meeting - May 17, 1994 Call to Order - 8:01 P.M. Resident Forum Agenda Approval Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes / Discussion Items 1. Public Hearing/Pine Hills Addition/93-l8 2. Variance/McDonald's 3. Review Schmitt/Allen Sketch plan 4. Downtown Center 2nd Addition Sketch Plan 5. Rezoning/Section 22/City of Andover 6. Pheasant Glen Discussion/Hokanson Development 7. 'No Parking' Signs/Cul-de-sac;Woodland Creek 3rd Closed Meeting with Attorney EDA Meeting 8. Expand TIF District 9. Order Plans & Specs/Commercial Park/94-l3 10. Andover Park Complex #2/Commercial Park 11. Purchase of Auto Salvage Yards \ J Reports of Staff, Committees, Commissions 12. Septic Inspection Discussion 13. Accept Eauestrian Council Resignation & Appoint New Member 14. 15. Approval to Hire Engineering Intern 16. Reclassify Building Inspector Position Non-Discussion Items/Consent Agenda 17. 18. Adopt Resolution/SWMCB Environment Procurement policies Cont. 19. Reserve Fund Balances - 12/31/93 20. Approve Final Plat;Woodland Creek 4th Addition 21. Approve Final Plat/Hills of Bunker Lake 5th 22. Approve Assessment Abatements 23. Accept Feasibility Report/94-3/140th Lane 24. Accept Petition/94-9/Fox Woods 25. Receive Petition/Andover Center/94-11 26. Approve CCO#1/93-10/SuperAmerica 27. Accept Petition/94-12/Forest Meadows 28. Accept Feasibility Study/94-12/Forest Meadows 29. Approve 'No Parking' Resolution/Northwoods West Park 30. Receive Feasibility Study/94-5/SuperAmerica Addition 31. Receive April Financial Statements 32. Approve Summary/Ordinance 104/Pawnbrokers Mayor-Council Input pa~ent of Claims AdJournment CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE AGENDA t-O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Approval of Minutes ITEM t-O. Admin. BY: Approval of Minutes V. Volk The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: April 28, 1994 Special Meeting May 3, 1994 Regular Meeting MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA 1\0. SECTION Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 1\0. TOdd,J. H~as, /~ Eng~neer~ng ?-.- Public Hearing/pine Hills Addition/93-18 BY: . ~ /. The City Council is requested to hold a public hearing, Project 93-18, for street improvements in the pine Hills area. Attached are the following: * Resolution ordering improvement * Letter to property owners * Public hearing notice * List of property owners * Copy of original petition received by the City and map of area Note: The feasibility report was in your February 15, 1994 packet. Original total number of possible assessable lots - 21 Number in favor - 16 Number against - 3 Number unavailable - 2 MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS PROJECT NO. 93-18 IN THE PINE HILLS AREA AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 077-94 of the City Council adopted on the 3rd day of May , 19~, fixed a date for a public hearIng; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the such hearing was held on the 19~; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard were given such opportunity for same; and required published and mailed notice, 17th day of May NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 93-18 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby designate BRA as the Engineer for this improvement and they are directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements. the City Council at a regular meeting this and adopted by 17th day of MOTION seconded by Councilmember May , 19 94 , with Councilmembers and Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor ) Victoria Volk - City Clerk .....'...j....i...:~(]'/.,~~,.''':.:..,.,;\. ; . " ~ , , . -_1 < '"':.1. CITY of ANDOVER J 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 \' May 4, 1994 Re: Proposed 1994 street Construction/Pine Hills and Adjacent Properties/Project 93-18 Dear Residents: A feasibility report has been prepared to determine the estimated cost to pave the streets in the above mentioned area. Discussion: J We are proposing to construct with 2.5" bituminous paving 24 feet wide, with three foot wide shoulders that consist of topsoil and sod and over 4" of gravel base course (Class V). The streets in the area presently exist as 22-26 foot wide rural section roadways consisting of fine sand and gravel base. Estimated Cost: The estimated cost is $5,585.00 per typical lot. This cost can be assessed over a 10 year period at about 6.0% or the assessment can be paid in full within 30 days with no interest. Assessment Period/Cost: The annual assessment payment over 10 years at 6.0% is $62.00 per month or approximately $744 per year. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, -;4.j /ku-- Todd J. Haas Assistant City Engineer TJH:rja Encl. J i......,OrJ";;~~~.C!;::::':"'''.,;)......\.... ~. 1 ~ ., .L . ,'\ " 4~ .' : ,~'Io~\, :~~ 1<-_._ _:- ".:;\._>'f~:' CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 " CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 93-18 PINE HILLS AND ADJACENT AREAS NOTICE is hereby given that the City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. in the City of Andover, on Tuesday, May 17, 1994 at 8:01 P.M. to consider the making of the following improvements: Street Construction The property to be assessed, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429, for the improvement is within the following described area: All that area of Pine Hills located in Section 17-32-24, Anoka County, Minnesota. and The west 300 feet of the north 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 17-32-24. and That part of the north 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 17-32-24 lying west of the east 660 feet and lying east of the west 300 feet. The estimated cost of such improvem~nt is $117,250.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. CITY OF ANDOVER \ , J ~jd'L victor~a Volk - City Clerk Publication Dates: May 6, 1994 and May 13, 1994 17 32 24 42 0003 Jerome & Marcy podraza 16070 Quay St NW Andover, MN 55304 , 32 24 43 0006 .ncibert& patricia Rewey 3470 - 159th Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 ,- 17 32 24 42 0007 Lawrence & Shelly Morgan 16021 Quay St NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 41 0009 Bryan & Kristi Seline 3353 - 159th Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 41 0012 David Fields 16070 Narcissus st NW Andover, MN 55304 '7 32 24 41 0015 llliam Murphy 3260 - 160th Ln NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 41 0018 J. Karkosh & D. Boyce 15921 Narcissus st NW Andover, MN 55304 93-18 (Pat) 17 32 24 42 0004 Jeffrey & Kathleen Norberr .16010 Quay st NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 42 0007 Daniel & Nancy Kociemba 3430 - 159th Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 42 0008 Richard & Darlene Berg 15981 Quay st NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 41 0010 Rich Sperl & Barb Olson 15980 Narcissus st NW Andover, MN 55304 173224410013 Michael pal10w 16071 Narcissus st NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 41 0016 Ronald & K Markgraf 16011 Narcissus st. NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 44 0012 Parent Framing Const. Inc. 3186 - 140th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 42 0005 Joel & Wendy Larkin 3465 - 159th Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 42 0006 Michael Abbott 16041 Quay st NW Andover, MN 55304 " 17 32 24 42 0009 phillip Blake 15941 Quay st NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 41 0011 T. Elliott & K. Biruk 16020 Narcissus st NW Andover, MN 55304 173224410014 Frank & J. padula 4550 - 173rd Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 41 0017 Stanley & Barbara Colburn 15961 Narcissus St NW Andover, MN 55304 17 32 24 44 0011 Troy & Peggy Westerlunds 14955 Ivywood st. NW Andover, MN 55304 .' ..' ",...",........ (,fA::' -'" 't~:...,....... CITY of ANDOVER RECElVED APR 1"8 1994 CITY OF ANuOVER Date: .!/- /s -fy' '13-18 No. Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described area: ~/le HI LL.. 5 4c1~ do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by Construction of City <:;;T/'>ef'//~ and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. ------ SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION YES NO o 6Q ::3 1\ x ) ~ 2--- This petition was circulated hy9fl-'P~~ Address: Q /667{) 1./-j {.,,(]~-'C"""''"''.\ '.l.. " .~ . , ... -.;I''' ..~~:...=..' CITY of ANDOVER Hl:;CErVED " APR 1 8 1994 CITY vr ".......,..JI/ER Date: '7:'" IC- Y C/ No. q3-18 Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described area: /0/ It! ~ ;Ir LI...~ do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by Construction of City <:::::" /1.<r f ~ and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION 17)1-;)..<{ 'fl CL'i;; YES NO , ).,.--- , I "'>-..1 , / , x i ( ,\ .'7 This petition was circulated by: ~.;L{~i(t~.~ Address: C) //(]70 C;/UCl...l -C""'f , , ~ \< t \Ii " ( ~ - CL " '~ \, ~ ~ ...... .~ .'> -0 ~. ,,~ ...... os:. ':'.:.,..... .."............;'.. .! "\- "'#'." ..::- .... ,~ ~,"::.;.:..... -.......:... ~'" - .:______:;t_ _:_ __._ ____ .~... .~ ,,~ .. ~~ ...... ~ ~:;...~ l~ii", .~ ~~""Y.. ~~....'~ ~ ~:l:.0 Z <'l>Jo.~~ ~~::- : ~... . .~ ~ ",.\' '" <;: 1 III Iii I" :11 :"-1 1 I.! " 1\ I f~ :~; . :l~' ;;1 I fl~' ! . , ....uoi!lnA.l v. . . \ .~ I . " '1: ,. ~ 'r.t ~ ~ ~"'- II. > I' > - 1';- [ - (" ~ :r ~ f ~ r ~ 1(1.. :t :[ ~ ~' ~ . .::. ...; ~ ~~ ~ -\. 1 .. ~ J! ~ 1 :::I: .........:... :~ ~ '" . ., J ~ ~ ~ ~ j .;--;.....WYO:~~~.. I ! , , ~ ' .. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Mav 17, 1994 AGENDA t\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Discussion Planning .~ '-c- BYV.. David L. Carlberg City Planner ITEM t\O. Variance Parking Setback 13731 Round Lake Blvd. NW McDonald's Corporation 62. REQUEST The City Council is requested to review and approve the variance application of McDonald's Corporation to Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08(8)(5), which requires parking facilties to be set back twenty (20') feet if abutting an existing right-of-way and ten (10') feet for side and rear yard off-street parking facilities. The property is located at 13731 Round Lake Boulevard NW. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW The Planning and Zoning Commission on May 10, 1994, made the motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the variance request. Attached is a resolution for Council review and approval that reflects the motion made by the Commission. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ) TO: I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, INC. TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 8.08(H)(5), WHICH REQUIRES PARKING FACILITIES TO BE SET BACK TWENTY (20') FEET IF ABUTTING AN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TEN (10') FEET FOR SIDE AND REAR YARD OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13731 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW. WHEREAS, McDonald's Corporation has requested a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08(H)(5), which requires parking facilities to be set back twenty (20') feet if abutting a right- of-way and ten (10') feet for rear and side yard setbacks on the property located at 13731 Round Lake Boulevard NW, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Downtown Center Second Addition; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has not determined that said request meets the conditions established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 and that a hardship does exist; and WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the variance request. ) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the variance request of McDonald's Corporation, Inc. to Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08(H)(5), which requires parking facilities to be setback twenty feet if abutting a right-of-way and ten feet for rear and side yard setbacks on the property located at 13731 Round Lake Boulevard NW with the following condition: 1. A joint parking facilities and access agreement be executed and submitted to the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of May, 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey. Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk ) / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE1ay 10, 1994 AGENDA ITEM 5. Variance Parking Setback RequiremEnt 13731 Round Lake Blvd. m McDonald's Corp., Inc. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: David L. carlberg City Planner ~ REQUEST The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the request of McDonald's Corporation for a variance to the parking setback requirement as specified in Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08, parking Requirements on the property located at 13731 Round Lake Boulevard NW. The property is zoned SC, Shopping Center. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08(H)(5), requires parking facilities to be setback twenty (20') feet if abutting an existing right-of- way. A ten (10') foot setback is required for side and rear yard off-street parking facilities. Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04, Variances and Appeals, regulates the variance process. GENERAL REVIEW The City Council, on May 3, 1994, gave preliminary approval to Exhibit A. The Council directed Staff to place the item on the May 10, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting agenda and to bring the item back to the May 17, 1994 Council meeting. COMMISSION OPTIONS A. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of the variance requested by McDonald's Corporation to Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08(H)(5) which requires parking facilities to be setback twenty (20') feet if abutting an existing right-of-way and ten (10') feet for side and rear yard off-street parking facilities on the property located at 13731 Round Lake Boulevard NW. The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the provisions of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. Page Two Variance j McDonald's Corporation, Inc 13731 Round Lake Boulevard NW May 10, 1994 B. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend denial of the variance requested by McDonald's Corporation to Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08(H)(5) which requires parking facilities to be setback twenty (20') feet if abutting an existing right-of-way and ten (10') feet for side and rear yard off-street parking facilities on the property located at 13731 Round Lake Boulevard NW. The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the requirements set forth in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. C. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends option A. Attached is a resolution for Commission review. \ J ) .f~ ..., '''~, , \I" ~ ~~~j ~I T ~~, ~. U~ "'" ., '.. ,:~s.~~ .., . ",,'; r{-;-o.~':"" An ,11 ,r>:':, I ~ .. ,- ~(a!, Nf' !.51 _ i~'M 1'\. . i""'i'"" ." 1 -\. I c...., -'~~J .-. '0"'" ..,Z :h r ,. ~~ ~'="r ~~~.~ ~.iI' ,. 2." . i:: I. ,.,,...,,, , .....;'Ilvh...... .......... N NOKA .........E OUNTY .......- ~~E~R I , S OVER - - ~~ Ir !I' .~~ \ .. "j \. '" .~,. -, ".) . ~~.l~3;;.'<Y(~.>::::':'. 'I :.~'~.Jri~~~':.--..""b:.:....:.;..1" "'~K~S~D;<S h'.' , ~ ;"t;~.'."'~ =:'='~;~ ....:.:"'. '.: '. .' ",~r; l\ _ ';" .~ . ~z . " . I Ir>--. ..' ~.',:,.:..,::>: "s ..2 r- I ESTATes ~ . . .! ~ .... !"'::::;v+r ' ': \~ ' ,1.1 ] I -.......'-- -'T"': L: '~;'~~~_~j I".~.,'.--i,;.:.::.:.: S "i" -~ ...... " ' . . . I:.:.....c ....:,..::.' ~D.~'!~ES'T' ,,' . - ____ ,'c --- ,:", . '.'~':>':;:'''-';'j'''.)..''..~.;;{ ';: - ^ \,\ ,. ~ $' \ ". ) ~ '\. \ ",.. ~ .:" .J !.' ,t '" \1 ~---L.L-:-- . .. 1). ::..,. .,~~ I- h. I L !/I....... II r. .Cc.....'... . - 1~';;'; ::.. i..,e., I 'bi' . E':''''' .i/.'. .. <, r~...',. . ~.. I': ROUND PI>-- !W..J ",';;;~, < W:D'~ ~.~~<ft:,s:~) LAKE ~--ii~:~~~~1[; I" --; '.' :.'7 -/,'';:'( G,."':'~ ;r ~ ~/'~' ./ . ~'1'1""":'r;- ... _- z.o --'-.- ///~-~1..~i .~ "".j,~~ '; ~)'~-~~~\- \;"~',~ ,\ ~\:,~:.:>><-:. d-l"-- ____~,,;~a;o'~ =~~ 1::11 ~"J"'t-Ir ~ """'. ~. '~.P'.H cS .~~ . ~..~; \~ &~Zi~"" '. '\ :""':'11 ~:i1 ~ ./~~ T~...I''''' :UB])'VI 10N_ 'Y/~<,. .: ..~ \ ~:.~ . \\ \\'. F a"e"""-r.'X ,....- . C ~:: C- 1Z \ ' '~.'4\~ '\ _ _ './,.__:1 t'- 4," . ... . ~ '--"I" I I~~~tql:"~' ""u " ,.,.'''..- -- R ,. " . !-;- ;,)...." '''''.. Iii:;::;r'"/,\' \ '.\" - " ,- r...;;.. ./.1, $\ . -. --; 1-' ~-,,_ I\I~ ..)(.~----1, ES~ATn. ,.. - l_ _>'''''-\' : .:..~;~.:,~.::~.:. \....\J~\,,;: ,_ ,.... .;~ ~ M. '-2 J)' .(. ""f-: .. ..., ,.00;; 1 . no . J ' Z - ,."- , ,....... _, i . 'I7oi~ .L..... t~ ~ · . ... r - ''/,/",-="," . _ __ .J,)" ~t I . ,..... ':r.r '~"lIfL ;:::--~'..\_ \-. i ~~':';'r .'.oWCtiii-_.' '."'~- -~ ~:. -~. ,.,,"'" ..L."""... ....... ,.....L.1:'0 .." ~ 'J iR':" ~. ....~"?'!....,..r. _( . ~ ., .~",. -....-.--- C> ~ .....'...... . - ~ , .. .,............,_ . C. ____.6e\_ _ ,/ .~. ~ ...... ,. . . :ll~ '~~ i .;....".. - -T, ~ 'W o"f "-. '. . ....'----[}H-JJ 1 tl~. ~ -.' ".~'~' ~i-'~:;:: -fV'~_._! G ~~~~:J-.! '!:'. "I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ,...y~~ ~~ :..I.}i\.i.j.....w A~ ~~f:-li,7f:J l-! F.i ~r~.,....,.....,,';~~ : "if :. ....,. /. ','. o. ~. ~o'l'Tj '." '>"fi C ~ :;1-' .. ~: . ~~ ......~.i.. ~!"... .' \)! \. ." ~ .:; ~~::::.::'.:. :: '1i'~Il[ ......~.:;:- : . . ~". . ....". : -,~..) " ::i .u LO." ':"~...... . (~ .. ~~ . ..oo~ '. -X0.....''-.I J' \ '" ,..,- ;~=~...... ~.". ............ ....." ~ ~.._._...,:: ..,..... ."., ..,..A~ ' -"\. :::z .".' .,~'., ... '.~.. :..~. I . I. -!.. ... ....1'Ii iI.. -,.,N.1 ; 1 ~t::f ..;:~ . '0'" ...... ---'--' .. . ...,. .....'...,. I . ~:i -=" / ":.r.'r---. .."....... , ...~. .- ."':....~..~,_.. '. R A I!\ ill;- \ ~~",..:. - ~', . .If>'~~~~;;- -~. ,. '\>,:.,::: i,~ .~ :t-iJ~:~'h I ,_1 --~; ~"<:,,.~~.::~SC' ......;::..' I.. iE! ~'~ -~ - - INS 'J1!-;.,,:,=jL:=:7i~'. ...,.I.,.M ~ ~i_~?;~" ""' -LJW ~:=.~~~~i;: i~~~ -=- ~ZYq/) ~4%'f~:'e .~~.&:-~ ~~.~.';~~ ~ ~~1-11~r,~. ~.:.. ~~\ ,., CIfooI~~ tr.~:i-i _ ""'-J\ 110 " ;'" ;.-:~'~'~ ~~~ c---...t: ~~\. ):..~7... .: ,~ .-..'.II~_'- '..'{!;c~:\.; r-II-- ~ 'I ~~ h!l 1.\\ '"'1;'1";;' I'g::;~.!.' . - ~.' <=: . . ,. '. .. ..~' ...fi'7~~"".: ; ~'-j.CS 'I.. .-...'....--<;: ..(J"D'-"~~;) ,,, _". ..: I .. I~ \ . .. . =.,. l1:kd'V"....... s,~ . .. .___. . __rr ~cJl.~I~~~~zi"" r,;; -'~.' - ::. '~~."';;'~-:- ~ .. ,/ t": .l:t~ ;.,..4; .t~'.:ilrir .. .~~~,,~ -?<- ....., . . .. .~. i';'rzr~',p:-~"5-:;.;r~~!..!~;- ~"';." ;:;I]~ _ ..._, '- D SHADED AREA DENOTES PARK AREA HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM 05/0:1/94 15: 16 '5'612 11115 4755 MCOONAl.OS CORP rar l!!!J/OO:l / ~ (J\ H oc: C) U '-/ " >- .4: ~ :r: l::J - ~ l=il:l >~ -Ie m w ., y: ,<[ I -I H Z :J D ~ A o <> ci <> . '" . ,.. . o .. <> z 21' ~O.' EXIST'G T TRANSf. -- 0 eXISTING PARKING N 89' 4" E 6D. O' ~ I~- ;:- .. 0: ~ SERIES 2000 ." ~ .. 0: u << < ... ~ 57'-6. .. ... .~ r <> 1,.-0" I 9 ~ ~ " 89"44.34" r 460.00' BUNKER LAKE BL VD. (DIVIDED HIGH\oIAY> (CD, RD. ALPO 612 421 4426 P.02 05/05/94 14:55 fr612 885 47~3 MAY-0S 94 e9:11 FROM: MClJUNALDS CORP 755-B923 TOf 61~ BB5 ~7SS ~004 PAGE: 0C '\ "....' .'...... , (r7i · .'. CITY of ANDOVER ;~r\. ,. ". . "..' . VAl\lANCE JtEQUC;ST roa~ Property Address /3731 I'(~kul hl'1J. f!J/~IJ /ViA....) I. L09a1 Description of property: (Fill in whichever 1s approprIate)! Lgt Block Addit:1on Plat Parcel PIN (If met.s and bounds, attach the co.plete legal) ~-----~---"--------_._-----------~--------~--~N__~~___M______________ De$Cr1ptlon Of s,~IJ/"L ~. Request ~~ A.t~":'A'::.J, 7u'-'r- /~.1J7 ~ Section of Ordinance -M--~--~M~--~.~.--M-------___~__________N_~~.~N~W~__~~__________~____ Name of Applicant: M~ bo/!/A/ ^'S Lo~k>-t1A1/v~ Addreu /450 .....;. ~'2--.d"'};, ~r'T~ qtj-(). 1Sl...LJcJM//U~-r'i?Yf~ /11,.J <,--rq~L Ho.. 'hon. ~~ . .usi.... . 'ho.. ,,;./2. _ 1]'2'1- ":IS-$" Si'Jnat:uu ~. Date <;,"-.-S-.9'1 M---N_W_~"______N_________________~___.___~._______.__-~.--~_~___N__~ prot'u.ty Owner (Fe" Owner) /((7~//,,. ~"Jn/fp,,/ gr~ersh~ (If different from above) Address /3'1:J 5 Ife>uncl Lna .A'/JJ"",./n PVL -4Hot,tJ"~ mlf S$~ Korne Phone Business Phone t6/c2-1/Q?/-.y--Y6?C? \SifJnatur. ":: ~, 4A4-d~ 7- Date .5' -5- 9.y I..-~------~~~~~~-----------_._--------------_._--_.- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 3, 1994 AGENDA r..o. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Discussion ITEM r..o. McDonalds Corporation Variance Discussion Planning ~ David L. Carlberg City Planner BY: The City Council is requested to review, discuss and give direction to McDonalds Corporation on a recent dilemma that has surfaced in the development of the site at 13735 Round Lake Boulevard NW. The Council is being consulted at this time because of the crucial time frame of development and construction on the site indicated above. Situation / Upon the surveying of the property at said location, McDonalds Corporation became aware that with the widening of Round Lake Boulevard, Anoka County had acquired additional right-of-way at the site. With the acquisition, the new property or right-of-way line is now the western curb line of the Downtown Center parking lot. Based on the current Zoning Ordinance requirement of a twenty (20') foot greenspace between right-of-way and parking areas a substantial amount of parking spaces will be lost. McDonalds Corporation would like to see a variance to the greenspace requirement and asks that if the Council's review of the variance request is favorable to place the item on the May 10, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting agenda and the May 17, 1994 Council agenda. Staff asks direction from the Council at this time. Note: Staff will continue to work with McDonalds corporation to resolve the issue prior to the May 3, 1994 meeting. If any alternatives are discovered Staff will present them to the Council at the meeting. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: / TO: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA SECTION t-O. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t-O. Review Schmitt/Allen Sketch Plan Andover Review BYi\ ~;b commit~ 1/lr ..:3. The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan submitted by Mal Allen and Steve Schmitt. The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan and their comments are as follows: General Comments * The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-1 Single Family Zoning District with a minimum lot size of 108,900 square feet. Sixteen (16) lots are being proposed. * All lots are required by ordinance to front onto City streets. * The location of the two (2) streets that intersect with CSAH 7 do not meet Ordinance 10, Section 9.02(c) as entrances need to be at intervals of 660 feet. * There is some concern with the ARC regarding the street alignment. We do recommend the westerly cul-de-sac be extended north to 173rd Avenue NW. The proposed north-south street that is proposed to connect the two east-west streets is recommended to be a cul-de-sac due to wetlands that may exist along 173rd Lane NW. * All streets including 173rd Avenue NW will need to be constructed to meet Standard Specifications for Rural Residential Street Construction. CONTINUED MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: * All lots will require to meet Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 a(3) j which relates to lot size requirements and buildable area. The property is not located within the MUSA area. Therefore, the lots shall be buildable which meets the 39,000 square foot requirement. * The Water Resource Management Plan which was recently updated and approved by the Andover City Council, Coon Creek Watershed District and the Lower Rum River WMO is to be implemented with the development. * The 100 year pond elevation based on ultimate development will be required to be identified on the preliminary plat. In addition, drainage and utility easements are required for the 100 year flood elevations. * The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (DNR, u.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lower Rum River Watershed WMO, MPCA, LGU and any other agency which may be interested in the site). Initial contact should be made with the City regarding this item. * There may be wetlands within the plan that must be delineated by agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local Government Unit is the Lower Rum River WMO. The developer shall contact the Watershed to discuss the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act Permanent Rules that are in effect. \ ) * The developer is required to meet City Ordinance 8 and 10 and all applicable ordinances. Remember: This has not been studied by staff in detail as most of the detail will be reviewed with the preliminary plat. Park and Recreation Commission Comments The Commission will be reviewing the sketch plan at their May 19, 1994 regular meeting. Planning and Zoning Commission Comments The Commission is concerned with the jog the may be created with the existing 173rd Avenue NW at the northeast corner of the plat. These two streets should be aligned in such a way to create a 4 legged intersection (not a 3 legged intersection that is proposed). In addition, the Commission was concerned with providing access to the property to the southwest for future development. Otherwise, the Commission agrees with the ARC on the general comments mentioned above. ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA SECTION 110. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 110. Downtown Center 2nd Addition Sketch Plan Andover Review BYn.~/) comm~ yv- .t/ The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan of Downtown Center 2nd Addition as presented by Andover Limited Partnership. The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan and their comments are as follows: General Comments * The proposed sketch plan is located in an (SC) Shopping Center Zoning District. Minimum width is 200 feet and minimum depth is 150 feet. * The property is located within the MUSA which means sanitary sewer and water is available to the site. * The developer is required to meet City Ordinance 8 and 10 and all applicable ordinances. Remember: This has not been studied by staff in detail as most of the detail will be reviewed with the preliminary plat. Planning and zoning Commission * Variance required for front lot line per Ordinance 8, Section 3.02, Definitions. * Joint parking facilities and access agreement shall be executed and submitted to the City. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: l>r lJ ::l0 :u 0- 0 ij ~UJ -0 fTI Om ::u 0- --l ,. cO -< "'\:", ::lo _:0:- 0 -< . ~ fTI ~o (f) 0 ::l0 :u ii::E -0 "'z --l S--l 0 00 :E z z 0 fTI Z --l fTI :u l1> l1> n r1':tI 0. '1 H :!.~;;~::'t~:Y . ... .... 0 0 1'1 I~ \'~' VI III n " '1 " ,"""-,orl,,. If II 1'1 {Jl II ':~,..~. (.~ _ "~ ~,~ G It n . G.~ ~ ~ J: ~ . ~ ,., Y ;{,-,\:r:':J ~ '\J ,.. 'r.: ~: '\'{;t- 0. ~ ~ Ho t... ~" b:.Vi~~'<C (] II"''::J'' r' 'tl II ~ II ~ ):l [ ?t...r. ~ 0. r' ~ ~ ~.~ n. tf g. ...... 0 '1 '<,.... ~ ~l 5;;'0- ~ ~ ~ ., ~ f!. '1 H 0 ~ o r1' '1 It ~ if t F. ~ o t"~~~ ~ n. '1 ~ r. o I" U 0 '" ,.~ '-< 'I l1> Nl>l <.D !OCT> 01 <.D .f>. = 11 o O. \Z\ ~ 0' ., " D ~~ ~~OI [~ ~I ~JI= ~~P"i ~?;~ ~~ ~ o..r, ~ n (l) :J ~~~ V1l/l ~~ :JOO ~90:J:J )> Z o o < III :lJ r s: -l III o 'LJ )> :lJ -l Z III :lJ (j) I -U -u JJ o -U o (f) m o -U r )> -J o ." o o ~ " Z ( o -J _ :lJO ~ Z o m z -J III JJ f\) Z o )> o o -J o Z CITY OF ANDOVER . / REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Mav 17, 1994 AGENDA SECTION t\O. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t\O. Rezoning - Section 22 Fields of Dreams R-1 to GR city of Andover Planning ~ David L. Carlberg City Planner BY: fY- ,5'. REQUEST The Andover City Council is asked to review and approve the request of the City of Andover to rezone from R-1, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation the property legally described on the attached amendment to the zoning Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION The planning and zoning Commission tabled the item at their March 22 and April 12, 1994 meetings, to give City Staff and Anoka County Staff the opportunity to meet and discuss the properties being condemned by the County along Crosstown Boulevard NW. The Planning and zoning Commission, at their April 26, 1994 meeting, made the motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning. Attached are the minutes and Staff report for Council review. Attached is an amendment to Section 6.03, District zoning Map for Council review and approval. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ J TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ~ ORDINANCE NO. 8 DDDD AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No. 8 is hereby amended as follows: The District zoning Map of the City of Andover shall be amended as shown on the attached map, showing the following rezoning: The property described as follows is rezoned from R-1, single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation: The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. Except roads. Subject to easements of record, if any. / Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of May, 1994. City of Andover J. E. McKelvey, Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk J 1 II r 1 . -.I . ---, , . , , I , , ";;, ,,;'; ',::,,:: ,";::": '- I " .:.i' ':':' ,,:-.:,. ;'pJ:'). ...:~.,. ~ .,.,....:' ,,",;;. ,:: ~' ~ ,(: \V '?;:';-;:i C,':- ,) ,,_; ,:/:.:./,': Xi: i-<'2 './";0""'" >, --...... '~'lB" ,,'.~~;;! i;;;;5:'~~';i!'" "\: ~ ~; ")Z",--- .j:,':..:cL. .i;::.::;:/\:;.::(~::\:: i.:~;\:X: ::<, 1! ~ <> ___.:...__~~ " J J I,~ ~EYrA~ "'NlfiHr!NfiALL , SB:QIlI) ADOITIQN II ),: .~~ ! I I I ' -' i 1 ! i , , I , -- , I i ! I I I I , I i , I I , , I , I , , , I i , __so I , I I I '.;;:~;~~ :.,.. "''':".' .' jR:~ J . <~r~~,;nf: 1'. -. _.. ..~~~\Y/i:~f. I ! " I ' -~---I----- -- - ~~, IR-I i ~, I /- _____~___ I _lu: '~i(~ \... i:::J II~\/": "'~ : "" DEl':'R""""t,,"/"i : : I I! I i ij'::~.n>~ ~__ __~~______',,__ ~: ~..~.- \ M - ~I: r:"!!~ ~ . 'I ~1F?gE : .':' :".:?? ~"" _.: " .~ "". ':- ~..:.,: ~';:~~~'~I . - In . .. '.'. .!.,,:-:. ..'-- .. I~I'!,. , :: ~', ',: "'4~~,j(~;; 1"-. .: ~ , I ~ :: ....... ~t~' '/. I' ;: ~. . " . '::'.l~~/. I "fUt' , . . ~ i~ b. t '.. r ...l..- . ;;",. "'2f'1J0 ~ ' , . . .. , EVERGJ :EN : ~.,....... .~. ,.'4 T .,.;... '" /. ~F5-t R-4: l~"~~~; _..A-,,\ ~. i~ .1 : !~ <~(-1/~~., ~ rr~:~ ~--~ ~ -"'---- ~'1 '1' R~ --:z: :' t:: .~ ~ Ii r,~ "'--'..J'" .;..J: . ~ --. UI ~~">;.r::::, ~.~~w. 'I'U: I- :' F ~.'I'!~''''.'- ",.'t...~~~_:~. '~v/ ~ IIII '.-' : . I . -I';:" :~'~ ~ '-'\..;...~'~ : , ~~~. ... )?L.>~ I ... ; < ">':.;~.~:'[;.;t{:.~~..~'-,';.,:/i'" ~;~. ~..' A ,.=:~ -- : \~ ... 1 ::::....,.....,.. ..... .)~Z~O:;:;:' R _I ~r'~ ., ,I '.'.,.,.,: :.).:'. ,'S,'.'. ,':.. ' ". ~ ;.. I ~~ I I ;':;'~:o.~ .. . .(- A : !..:;.vRUN '."'~ ~:;<;:.'-: ;..:.,-,: :;.~,: ., "..,1'.. ;..";'-{LA I ;".. ~~" S.~.~: '.;:'2;~:: ~_:.:.:. ~ ""'~O:TIOftrl"'\ . ! J I~' 'o~ 011,'.'-0,., ":I'!oI""-,yg /h,.~. :-~~ .,,::::::,~ ,';;"" ~Pi IN6R/'HiiOOt.s'i.'....,.j.l, '. ^ ~.. . ." ".,'.::::,0; /'.'U~.!.i.I.,1 II .i'I.,.j'l' ~I~ ;' :', ~:':'~.' :: :' :-"".; : -' -.fjDf?lPP!I"j;.;' .,., .. ~~:.;: : . -.: ,".IiJ.i- . . : I'I-i'i-I.:-a ~~. >'Z:[ .ffj'I",J;i~,'.. t:-.'. 'iff : G S . ."'~~/ ~~~! .::~ 1'I,'j./,,,,,,. .,. . . ': ..1;. _u_u___ _Uu --,'... ~~ .~'<.,~ /. ,. , ~ -:':'''~/:?: : ~r~~~ ~ -i ~ h:..J~~~ ~:''''/~ /.~~ RE, '-;-;;. '." ": .1"1".1.,."'. . Ii ~ 'i'l..'.~;.<~ "',.;,.,~ d%'<;;i . :. ;:. .....,.. ...-e., '~--t v~:i:i~~~' "'" i I t~. ~~~~;;j ?;.;,.)'z';;;'''ili;. I 'Y K ~I 1 ~.,4o", "- ~'''-. " l\ '-~~ It . . ""'-- ""..1' ".;I'IPH;~ ~ \~'l:t . - I,. .~ I. ~'oll"~_ i".1 J.:lU~ i.~';~';':; :' ~ ::?:I:E I I U ~ -. -N"r' ~ lJ/~ _;ANoO' R Vlc-tr ,. ,"e,a;";' t7 ' 8h ~..., . . I' ~lE:CE: '.':K-''' ",', '.,;' .,~:~-; , ' J :'~ .0' -o,~ ,fL t- I ~",: ~ ,i.;:",.".~: Hi-.::\1 _:>~ -~ I :::: _ ~.. C,"cKt ';;'2"0 -4)0. _ , a PARK 'i ..:..J. ...., o. AS t: ~ ./l -., ., ---- - - .. '00" s ..", . . . f:::i/'5.'-?~ I' _4_1_ "'~FEEEE ~~." ~m ~ ...-....:..1 ;::;r,. ..' .. CZ.,~~~ : 3"'".t -mR _ ' tt;;:il(111N.J.:I'.1 i .N>;'/7il'7OG ...--..... :- C~f~~: r -: ~ f$~tJ7 ~ II' ~ pRO. I I I I . ~'i~ ....., :;): ~:;:: .',':::.: -.: :: ';'\: ~. :;:.;x: ) ,',',,",,'''':::::' e,S:h:, i:' ':' '::;,:. '.'j".:..C.". : .: I,. :. n. . !~i ,"C~,;,~", .~~.:.:.. 'iI\!t ~:.~ ~!t'::.:~:-l::j:C' ";".'- .. :~".I # .' ,. .. ('~.b ~~~-' ~TI Iii i t- /'\ / US Ilf l- . I ., PAMfONIN' ..00. II! . ~~''"''', ". : !Wk -- I: ~_.. O...!~ ,. : ~..\ I --( ~ _. ----; ~~"-}~,,, , I C. t..~-..... . ii', '_tMCII,." I ~ .....-..;. - It." - . r---.--.. h... ....,..J. ." ,Q:!, k::'.," ~ .~,.t'!.7""..':";'~""'j'i'_.r,,,,LS -z'j~~..;."--i.'. *.] ~~..~~2 .. HILJ.S,~..~ L:!:'~3 .~~-;;-. 'I 6 .. '.1,",.. '" -r.' "'i.....,~~~,...~... L"" ';;P'";.J.~o;,. .. J ~. Ie,:/. . "'" : ,: :\ r'o. "~:~~K~ ~.:.:,~ .~~I~.~.- . , '.__ t ''''--:IUWK,.1f .11';" .. j' IS' .-""I'l~, .._" ~~"q"1 .."'0 :: I '5 .' '.~. . . r "'... 'r. .' ,~:. ~" ~r, -:- .'10... .', ~f!~"'~ ......;\ .. ~ ~ _'~ i ,_ :;; ;::,;:..(......1... ;11-".....=..:.\";::;.< =,-; h: '/", ....::...=:i ~ i I .,/.3R:J.ofH, ""=.)" '~:r.:;." ;;;.u.ND 'J::.~ I L ..,.... ".. : i; I~' s" . ..........-.. _o......~~~:-:- 'I ADO"Z1,..__ 1 ,-- ,~,-" NB /' .,. .1"..".."<1....".,,.. I ....,~ . i .. . ~:I I' I I ! I i I U , .' ..~ ...... J! ; I -3.:ii! .- IT . f WA. '~T's - t 'G ARrtJEN. ~.. . "<4,~. i"" ". : ~ '4 .j ~ . >1 " -l .l.. L i ~ ./ ~~3lO->>'" PLANNING CITY of ANDOVER AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 26, 1994 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Jay Squires on April 26, 1994, 7:00 p.m. at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. commissioners absent: Also present: Maynard Apel, Bonnie Dehn, Becky Pease (arrived at 7:20 p.m.), Randy Peek, Bev Jovanovich, Jerry Putnam None City Planner, David Carlberg Others Commissioners present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 12" 1994: Page 1, Becky Pease should be listed as absent. MOTION by Jovanovich, Seconded by Dehn, approval as corrected. Motion carried on a 6-yes, I-Absent (Pease) vote.' , ) @ PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: REZONING - REZONE PROPERTY FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO GR, GENERAL RECREATION - PART OF SECTION 22, CITY OF ANDOVER 7:02 p.m. Mr. Carlberg informed the Commission of the meeting of two County Commissioners and City representatives on this proposed rezoning. The county had opposed the rezoning because of the three single-family parcels involved. The county has acquired two of them and is negotiating for the third for right of way when Crosstown Boulevard is improved. The county had thought the parcels were much larger. In reviewing the ordinances, Staff pointed out the parcels combined would not meet the minimum requirements for the current zone. Based on that information, the county agreed to proceed with the rezoning as proposed. Staff also contacted Jim Martinson, owner of the remaining parcel to be acquired by the county, who indicated he has been working with the county on the acquisition of his property. He did not object to the rezoning at this time. Mr. Carlberg understood one of the three houses will be moved; the other ones are going to be demolished because of their conditions. with the change in the curve of Crosstown Boulevard, the road would be very close to the houses if they were to remain. It is also intended that those parcels would go back to the City and could then be included as part of the Field of Dreams complex. "\ J The Commission questioned whether the downzoning of those parcels would affect the values. Mr. Carlberg thought that could happen; however, it was his understanding the county and Mr. Martinson are negotiating the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 26, 1994 Page 2 (Public Hearing: Rezone City Property, Continued) terms of the sale. He did not think this rezoning would affect those negotiations. Right now the house is noncontorming, and the rezoning will not change that. Chairperson Squires also felt this rezoning will not create a liability for the City, as it does not change the nonconforming use. It was noted this is a continued public hearing. There was no further public input. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Dehn, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on a 6-Yes, i-Absent (Pease) vote. 7:12 p.m. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Dehn, to send to the City Council a recommendation that they approve a change in Ordinance No. 8 to rezone that area from R-l to GR as per the Resolution prepared by Staff. Motion carried on a 6-Yes, i-Absent (Pease) vote. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE-PE~I1UM1S ur.:CUPA1'lON -IN AN ACCESSORY ---.- STRUCTURE, 1:rr:$5~OUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW - DIANE M. FORSLAND ) .m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of Diane M. Forsland to operat a home occupation known as Designer Doors (door manufacturing) in an ac ssory structure at 15135 Round Lake Boulevard. He reviewed the layout the buildings and accessory structures on the two parcels involved, the plicable ordinances and criteria for issuing Special Use Permits. The p cel on which the accessory structure is located is 4.55 acres in size. taff has some concern with the noise that will be generated from the eration of the machinery and suggests regulating the hours of operatio to resolve it. Staff is recommending 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday throu Friday for hours of operation. In reviewing the history of e parcel, Mr. Carlberg reported there were two or three commercial oper ions on the site at one time, and the owner has moved all other opera 'ons off the site. The request is to allow the door manufacturing to erate on the site according to the ordinance regulations. If the Commi ion chooses to recommend approval, Staff has prepared a Resolution with conditions. (Commissioner Pease arrived at this time; 7:20 p.m.) Mr. Carlberg stated the City Attorney has vised that prior to the issuance of a Special Use Permit, that the app~icant combine the parcel on which the accessory building is located with the adjacent one to the south on which his principal residence is locate~~ Mr. Forsland does not have a problem with that suggestion. That should be added as a 14th condition to the Resolution. There are also two other accessory structures on that northern parcel which are used as rental units. '\ ) Commissioner Dehn was concerned about the one driveway to be used for this home occupation, the two rental units, and the private residence. She felt it is a traffic concern. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST F.OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION April 26, 1994 DATE David L. Carlberg City planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA .y~ AGENDA IT.EM " 3. Pub11C Hearing Cont. Rezoning - R-l to GR - Section 22 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning BY: '; / REQUEST This item was tabled at the April 12, 1994 meeting. Staff met on .Wednesday, April 13, 1994 with representatives of Anoka county to discuss the rezoning of the three parcels located along Crosstown Boulevard NW. In reviewing the parcels it was determined that once the right-of-way was subtracted from the properties the remaining parcels would not meet the current minimum district requirements for an R-l, single Family Rural District. Based on this information the County agreed to proceed with the rezoning of the property. Staff also contacted Mr. Jim Martinson owner of the remaining parcel not acquired by the County. Mr. Martinson indicated that he has been working with the County in the acquisition of his property. He did not object to the rezoning at this time. The Commission should consult the staff report presented at the March 22, 1994 Planning and zoning Commission meeting for background information and a decision on this matter. , , / (0 . .\..l'\, CITY of ANDOVER / ,. \' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - APRIL 12, 1994 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Plannipg and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Jay Squires on April 12, 1994, 7:00 p.m. at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioner absent: Also present: Maynard Apel, Bonnie Dehn, Becky Pease, Randy Peek (arrived at 7:14 p.m.), Bev Jovanovich, Jerry Putnam Becky Pease City Planner, David Carlberg Others Commissioners present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 22, 1994: Correct as written. MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Jovanovich, approve the Minutes for March 22, 1994, as presented. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2-Absent (Pease, Peek) vote. @ PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING - REZONE PROPERTY FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO GR, GENERAL RECREATION - PART OF SECTION 22 - CITY OF ANDOVER Mr. Carlberg explained a meeting has been scheduled with City Staff, Mayor McKelvey, County Staff and County Commissioners to discuss this issue. He recommended the item be tabled to the next meeting so the results of that meeting are known before proceeding. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Dehn, to so move. Motion carried on a 5- Yes, 2-Absent (Pease, Peek) vote. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - CHURCH IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - 16 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW - CONSTANCE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH '. 7:05 P.M. arlberg reviewed the request of the Constance Evangelical Chu 0 construct a church at 16150 Crosstown Boulevard, which is north, s l61st Avenue from their present location. He showed the proposed cli layout with driveways off both Crosstown Boulevard and l6lst Avenue. In e~ing the criteria used in granting Special Use Permits, Staff found the---Church would have no detrimental effects and recommended approval with th~tions of an annual review and a one-year sunset clause. Staff will be reviewing the site plans to be sure all ordinance requirements are met. Mr..Carlberg also. noted the location of the parking area surrounding the existing and future cemetery and the ability to expand the parking to the west in the future. There is ample room on the site for the proposed use. / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION April 12, 1994 DATE AGENDA ITfM 3. Pub ~c Hearing Cont. Rezoning - R-1 to GR - Section 22 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning David L. carlberg~ City Planner BY: ::> :.-c APPROVED FOR AGENDA " , BY: REQUEST ) The Andover Planning and zoning Commission tabled this item at the . March 22, 1994 meeting. The item was tabled to allow City Staff and county Staff to meet and discuss the County's plans for the three residential dwellings proposed to be rezoned from R-1, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation. prior to the March 22, 1994 meeting, City Staff was under the impression the properties would be developed as a part of the nField of Dreamsn site. City Staff has been informed that Anoka County Commissioners Berg and McCauley will be meeting with City Council members to discuss the issue. The County has requested the item be tabled until said meeting has been conducted. Staff recommends this item be tabled until the County Commissioners have met with City Council members and have discussed the County's plans for the parcels. '1 / Regular Andover Planning and zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - March 22, 1994 Page 6 (Amend Ordinance 44, Auto Recycling/Junk Yard Ordinance, Continued) .' MOTIC!N .by Apel, Seconded by Dehn, ~hat the Planning a~d zoning" Comm~ss~on forward the amendments to Ord~nance 44 to the City Council as presented for their approva~. ~otion carried on a 5-~es, 1-No (Peek), 1-Absent (Putnam) vote. Th~s w~ll be heard at the Apr~l 5 City Council meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: AMEND ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4.03, NON-CONFORMING USES _ AUTO RECYCLING/JUNK YARDS CONSTRUCTING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 8: 12 p. m. Mr. Carlberg noted this amendment would allow the auto recycling yards that are licensed as of AprilS, 1994, to construct commercial buildings as provided in Ordinance 44. MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Apel, to open the public hearing. Motion carried on a 6-Yes, l-Absent (putnam) vote. Mr. Carlberg stated the Building Official determines whether the structures are nonconforming or damaged over 50 percent of the fair market value. Chairperson Squires noted this item is noncontroversial given the motion on the previous agenda item. MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on a 6~Yes, I-Absent (putnam) vote. 8:15 p.m. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Dehn, that the Planning and zoning commission forward to the City Council for its approval an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 8 as presented in resolution form by Staff. Motion carried on as-Yes, 1-No (peek), 1-Absent (Putnam) vote. This will be placed on the AprilS, 1994, City council agenda. 8:15 p.m. '\ , / PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING - REZONE PROPERTY FROM R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO GR, GENERAL RECREATION - PART OF SECTION 22, CITY OF ANDOVER 8:15 p.m. Mr. Carlberg explained the request is to rezone the property known as the Andover Field of Dreams site located on Crosstown Boulevard NW west of the Andover Elementary School, He noted the four criteria used in determining the granting of a rezoning request. There has been discussion for allowing other uses on that site than just park uses. A GR zone would allow commercial recreation uses such as commercial batting cages. The City has received a letter from Anoka County indicating they oppose the rezoning. The area to be rezoned includes three parcels along Crosstown Boulevard that the county has purchased or is in the process of purchasing for the realignment of Crosstown Boulevard. All three lots are lawfully non-conforming uses, It had ahrays been the City's understanding that the City and county might negotiate to have those parcels incorporated as a part of the park, so the objection by the county has come as a surprise. The intent is.to grade the park area this summer and begin construction of the concess~on building. ! Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - March 22, 1994 Page 7 (Public Hearing: Rezone R-1 to GR, City of Andover, Continued) \' I' ) MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Jovanovich, to open the public hearing. Motion carried on a 6-Yes, 1-Absent (Putnam) vote. 8:21 p.m. Anthonv Palubo, Assistant Anoka County Attornev - stated over the last nine months they have paid in excess of $150,000 for the two lots they purchased, and they are negotiating with the property owner for the purchase of the third lot on Crosstown Boulevard. The county plans to upgrade Crosstown Boulevard to make it better for traffic. He understands that once CoRd 18 is redone, they would sell the residential lots subject to the appropriate zoning laws. It is the county's position that rezoning those particular lots to GR would significantly reduce their value. The county was not aware of the City's desire to incorporate those lots into. the park, and he was not aware of any discussions to that effect. At this time the county opposes the rezoning because they do not have enough information on how they will reconstruct CoRd 18 and the effect on the remaining property and how the rezoning will affect that value. The County Commissioners have just been informed of this, and they have indicated this should be the county position for now and to enter into further discussion with City officials about exactly what can be done to further mutual goals. He requested that the matter be continued to allow for that discussion. They do not oppose the rezoning of the City property; just the parcels owned by the county. Mr. Carlberg thought it would be appropriate to continue the hearing to allow time to discuss this with the county. He did not think the rezoning would affect the development of the park at this time. Commissioner Dehn was concerned about how the realignment of Crosstown Boulevard will affect the park. Mr. Carlberg didn't think the alignment had an impact on the park. , Dave O'Toole. Park and Recreation Commissioner and President of the Andover Recreational Development Association - didn't think delaying the rezoning would affect the process of development at this time. He had no problem working with the county to get the best possible solution to the three parcels. He would like to see them included in the park, but that will be left to the city and county. There was some concern about another entrance to the parkin area of the lots to provide better traffic flow and as a safety factor. Chairperson Squires recommended the item be tabled to allow the county and City to discuss the issue. , .I Jim Martinson - lives in the remaining house. He opposes the rezoning and doesn't understand how the rezoning issue got this far without including him. He wasn't included in the original plans. He is talking with the county, but he would like to be included in any discussions between the City and county regarding his property. Mr. Carlberg agreed, stating he had understood the property was being condemned. MOTIqN by Apel, Seconded by Dehn, that we table the public hearing until the next regularly scheduled meeting in hopes that we get a clear view of what we are doing. Motion carried on a 6-Yes, l-Absent (Putnam) vote. 8:35 p.m. . CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION March 22, 1994 AGENDA IT.EM 8. PubllC Hearing - Rezoning - R-1 to GR - Section 22 DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTM~T Planning David L. Carlberg City Planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: BY,t REQUEST The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the .request of the City of Andover to rezone property from R-l, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation. The property is known as the Andover Field of Dreams site and is located on Crosstown Boulevard NW, West of the Andover Elementary School. Consult the attached location map included in your packet materials. The rezoning request includes an area of 38+/- acres. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES , / Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for changing zoning district boundaries (rezoning). Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B), establishes the criteria for granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria shall also be considered in the determination of granting a rezoning request. The criteria include: the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, the effect on values of property and scenic views in -the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. If the Commission chooses to deny the rezoning request, it is imperative that the Commission indicate findings of fact in this and all rezoning cases. Page Two Rezoning - Section 22 City of Andover March 22, 1994 / BACKGROUND INFORMATION " ~ , The area requested to be rezoned is the site of the Andover Field of Dreams. The rezoning would allow some flexibility in the use of the property. According to Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, Special Uses in the GR, General Recreation District, commercial recreation uses other than specifically permitted require a Special Use Permit. Attached for Commission review are Sections 3.02, 7.01, 7.03 relating to commercial recreation and uses in the General Recreation District. .COMMISSION OPTIONS A. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend approval of the rezoning requested by the City of Andover to rezone property from R-l, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation, legally described on the attached amendment to Ordinance No.8. The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the criteria established in Ordinance No.8 Section S.03(B). " B. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend denial of the rezoning requested by the City of Andover to rezone property from R-1, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation, legally described on the attached amendment to Ordinance No.8. The Planning Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the criteria established in Ordinance No.8 Section S.03(B). C. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the item. , / ~ . / "- / COUNTY OF ANOKA Depanment of Highways/Right-of-Wa}. Paul K. Ruud. COl/llty Engineer Government Center, 2100 - 3rd Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303-2265 Phone (612) 421-4760 FAX (612) 422-7507 " " March 18, 1994 Mr. David Carlberg Planning Director 1685 Crosstown Blvd., Nw. Andover, Mn 55304 Re: Public Hearing - Rezoning March 22, 1994 Dear Mr. Carlberg: The Anoka County Highway Department wishes to declare its objection to the above cited proposed rezoning of two parcels owned by Anoka County. The present zoning would permit the future use of said properties as residential sites. The new zoning is considerably more restrictive. Should the rezoning continued to its conclusion, Anoka County would expect the properties to be appraised in view of the new zoning limitations and resultant change in highest and best use of the parcels to determine damages. Recent case law seems to hold that changes in highest and best use by governmental action constitutes a taking and is compensable to the owner. Thank you for your consideration. Data relative to the county's properties is available to you on request as is access if you need it. Sincerely, ~f< Michael R. Kelly Chief Right-of-Way Agent Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer ~ ~ J , , / Ordinance No.8, Section " Church: A building, together with its accessory buildings and uses, where persons regularly assemble for religious worship and which building, together with its accessory buildings and uses, is maintained and controlled by a religious body organized to sustain public worship. Club: A non-profit association of persons who are bona fide members paying annual dues. Their club structure, meeting place or lodge is a premises restricted to club members and their guests where food and drink may be served on such premises, providing adequate dining room space and kitchen facilities are available in compliance with the applicable Federal, state, and Municipal laws. Commercial Feed Lot: An area where fifteen (15) or more non- domest~c an~mals are confined. IV) Commercial Recreation: A recreation facility operated as a ~ business and open to the public for a fee. (8WW, 10-6-87) Commercial Vehicle: Any vehicle, including, truck, semi- tractor, van primarily used for the movement of cargo or passengers in the normal operation of a business. Commercial vehicles shall not be limited to vehicles with advertising permanently or temporarily. affixed to the body of the vehicle. (8KKK, 1-16-90) Comprehensive plan: Unless otherwise stated, it is the general plan for land use, transportation, and community facilities prepared and maintained by the community planning commission. Community: City of Andover. Condominiums: A form of individual ownership of property as def~ned by the Uniform Condominium Act of the State of Minnesota. (8BB, 4-2-85) Curb Level: The grade elevation established by the governing body of the curb in front of the center of the building. Where no curb level has been established, the engineering staff shall determine a curb level or its equivalent for the purpose of this Ordinance. Day Care Center: Any facility, public or private, that for compensation or otherwise, provides for the care of children outside their homes for periods of less than twenty-four (24) hours per day. Day care centers include, but are not limited to, day nurseries, nursery schools, child care centers and day care facilities. (8WW, 10-6-87) Density Zoning: Density zoning shall be interpreted to mean the permission of lower density (lot areas) standards under conditions whereby the number of dwelling units permitted is not greater than permitted by the application of the regular provision of the District but with all land excluded from the lot area requirements added onto public or semi-public open space (park, playground, school site, walkway or other approved. open green space.) Page 5 Ordinance No.8, Section~ .6:i1I,/ /l-C-nc.L'7qjJ l(4e.<J RECREATIONAL DISTRICTS: GR General Recreation District Cafes and restaurants Golf courses " Information centers Motels and hotels Resorts Sporting goods and boat sales including service and rental Urban agricultural BUSINESS DISTRICTS: LB Limited Business Business schools Churches Day Care Centers Medical and dental clinics \ ) Mortuaries and funeral homes Professional.offices Professional studios Rest homes and nursing homes Urban agricultural (8ZZ, 3-15-88) NB Neighborhood Business Day Care Centers Financial Institutions Medical and dental clinics Mortuaries and funeral homes Professional offices Professional studios Restaurants " , ) Retail trade and services (8ZZ, 3-15-88) Page 53 Ordinance No.8, Section , ) , 1.0) I / ., , / Home Occupations, on a parcel of land three (3 a.1 acres or larger, utilizing an accessory structure and/or exterior storage. (8MMM, 5-15-90) Marinas Public utility uses or structures except when located on a public right-of-way " " Rest homes (8M, 9-01-81) Riding Stables Storage buildings for boats, snowmobiles, or similar vehicles in R-5 only Two-Family Home Conversions (R-4 Districts only) 7-21-87) (8RR, Two-Family homes in R-4 and R-5 Districts only when lot locations are established and approved ~n original plat (8M, 9-1-81) MULTIPLE DISTRICTS All uses permitted by special use in Residential Districts except dog kennels. RECREATIONAL DISTRICT GR General Recreation District Commercial parks, camp grounds, trail rides, gun clubs and ranges, archery ranges, race tracks, commercial snowmobile courses ~Commercial recreation other than specifically \jS/ pe rmi t ted Commercial riding stables Dance Halls Golf driving range and putting courses Liquor License (8L, 7-21-81) Marinas Outdoor Theaters Tavern as secondary use of property BUSINESS DISTRICTS LB Limited Business Adult Use Businesses as defined in Ordinance #92 and as amended. (8NNN, 7-17-90) Clubs and lodges Page 57 tfi~"\ \"Cf\) ,....~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 " \' CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, March 22, 1994 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the rezoning request of the City of Andover to rezone property located in the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Anoka County, Minnesota from R-l, single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation. The property is the location of the City Hall Park Complex No.2. All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the application and location will be available at the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. \ ) ~~j~ Victoria Volk, City Clerk Publication dates: March 11, 1994 March 18, 1994 '\ J 22 32 24 44 0003 Anoka Hennepin School 11299 Hanson Blvd. NW Coon Rapids, MN 55433 22 32 24 44 0004 Dist City. of Andover - '32 24 42 0003 ~ .rold & GM Thompson 10040 201st Ave. Elk River, MN 55330 22 32 24 42 0008 Rhoda L Ostrowski 1901 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 22 32 24 43 0003 Mike Kelly Anoka County Govt Center 2100 3rd Ave Anoka, MN 55303 22 32 24 34 0001 Walter & Rosemary Laptuta 15026 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 ~ 32 24 12 0012 \ ,:y of Andover 27 32 24 11 0007 James & Theresa Schommer 14848 Jay st NW Andover, MN 55304 27 32 24 11 0009 Continental Dev. Corp. 12093 Ilex st Coon Rapids, MN 55448 labelsrezoneparkII I I I (Rhonda) I " , / 22 32 24 42 0004 Steven L Louden 1831 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 ,. ,. 22 32 24 42 0006 Christ G Evanov 1929 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 22 32 24 43 0004 Mike Kelly Anoka County Govt Center 2100 3rd Ave Anoka, MN 55303 27 32 24 12 0001 Charles & Linda Bies 1969 - 148th Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 27 32 24 11 0005 Continental Dev. Corp. 12093 Ilex St Coon Rapids, MN 55448 27 32 24 11 0020 Troy Vondall & Christine Gross 1758 - 148th Ln NW Andover, MN 55304 27 32 24 11 0010 Continental Dev. Corp. 12093 Ilex St Coon Rapids, MN 55448 22 32 24 44 0002 City of Andover 22 32 24 42 0005 Michael L Click 1853 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 22 32 24 42 0007 Steven & Deanne Thorson 1949 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 22 32 24 43 0005 James & Janice Sullivan 14905 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 27 32 24 12 0002 James & Colleen Gaikowsk 1919 - 148th Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 27 32 24 11 0006 Sarah & William Bulver 14836 Jay st NW Andover, MN 55304 27 32 24 11 0008 Timothy & Linette Jacobson 1771 - 148th Ln NW Andover, MN 55304 27 32 24 21 0001 Donald W Eveland 14722 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION May 17, 1994 DATE AGENDA f\O. SECTION Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J. Haas,~ Engineering APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM f\O. Pheasant Glen Discussion/ Hokanson Development BY; ~ C\t ~. The City Council is requested by Hokanson Development, Inc. to release the escrow fund for the area known as Pheasant Glen and the costs incurred thus far be placed against the subject project as requested by Roger Hokanson. Attached are the following: * Letter dated April 18, 1994 from Roger Hokanson requesting return of Letter of Credit No. 221 and the request to release the storm sewer issue between pheasant Meadows and the area , known as pheasant Glen. ; * Letter dated April 26, 1994 sent by City staff responding to the April 18, 1994 Hokanson letter. * Letter dated May 4, 1994 from Roger Hokanson requesting to discuss this item with the City Council. staff Recommendation 1. Require Hokanson Development to pay the $8,726.59 plus interest incurred prior to releasing Letter of Credit No. 221. If a developer purchases and plats the property within, lets say 5 years, some credit could be returned based on the benefit the new developer could receive from the existing engineering already completed. At this time we do not know whatchould be returned due to new development standards that could arise, or if a different layout of the property is proposed. 2. The Pheasant Meadows Development Contract should not be revised to release Hokanson Development from the storm sewer assessment as the City is unable to carry that cost. '. MOnON BY: I SECOND BY: TO: ")'.." >,,,...., .... :- "-", -: :,-':::' }-...;;; :::: :. ",:'". . .... "." . HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT~ INC. HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. '12-/6 " RECEIlVED APR 1 9 1994 CITY OF AI'iLJOVER April 18, 1994 Todd Haas/Darrell Sulander City of Andover 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN. 55304 Hokanson Development Inc. is requesting the return of letter of credit No. 221 for Pheasant Glen given that there is not and will not be such a project. This request is made based on the following findings: The letter of credit cannot be transferred by the bank per its own regulations (see attachment A). A new letter of credit should have been created rather than tranferring the letter of credit number from the existing Pheasant Meadows letter of credit (attachment B). " / The letter of credit makes reference to the development agreement for Pheasant Glen. There is not"to my recollection, a development agreement for Pheasant Glen (attachment C). I wish that it was possible to initiate the Pheasant Glen proj~ct but the sellers insist that the garage be left north of the house and the city has made it clear that it is not acceptable in that location. This (for the written record) was addressed in Anoka County court where city officials reinforced this position. The purchase agreement was subsequently ruled to be unillforceable. Accordingly, the project cannot be initiated nor can other pertinent items be adhered to by the affected parties. In line with this decision, we request the release from the storm water assessment that was to be allocated against the adjacent Pheasant Meadows plat. We request that the assessment be placed directly against the benefitting parcel. Sincerely, "- I I 9174 Isanti Street N.E., Blaine, Minnesota 55449 (612) 786-3130. Fax (612) 784-9136 . . 92-/6 .- (fA CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 '- " " April 26, 1994 Roger Hokanson, president Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 Isanti street NE Blaine, MN 55449 Re: Letter of Credit *221/Pheasant Glen Dear Mr. Hokanson: Although a development contract was not entered into between Hokanson Development, Inc. and the City of Andover, Letter of Credit *221 in the amount of $15,000.00 was accepted to cover the costs of preparing plans and specifications (streets and utilities) which was required in Resolution *R039-93 as approved by the Andover City Council. According to our financial records $11,638.59 has been spent on administration and engineering. By giving $2,912.00 in credit from other escrow deposits $8,726.59 is due. After this payment has been received the Letter of Credit *221 in the amount of $15,000.00 will be returned. Your request for the release of the storm sewer assessment that was allocated against the adjacent Pheasant Meadows plat cannot be possible without a change in the development contract for Pheasant Meadows, which will need city Council approval. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, CITY OF ANDOVER TO?7f~ Assistant City Engineer TJH:rja Encl. " cc: Daryl Sulander, Finance Director William G. Hawkins, City Attorney , / ,'1 (~ ~'('!'f -.,' ~ll''''''''~.''- r:/.'j:/,/'.' ... '. / _ ,[,~........,.- / I' . ,l.... :; /,,;.'; ;/ ?" I I HOKANSON DEVt:LOPMEr,lT, iNC. HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. " To: Todd Haas and Andover City Council From: Roger Hokanson ~ Re: Pheasant Glen "<\" v :RECEIVED MAY 6 1994 CITY r UI- f-'il\1LJOVER May 4, 1994 Since our litigation with Curt and Sue Hurst and their decision not to sell given that the garage cannot be placed where they desire, it is time to minimize our losses on this project. Some of our cost such as surveying, project engineering and staff time is lost. Other costs could be placed against the Pheasant Glen parcel since it has future benefit from the expenditures. ., j Letter of credit number 221 was used to guarantee engineering plans and specificationss. Since the project will not occur through our efforts, we request the release of the letter of credit 221. It is our preference to have it simply released and the costs incurred thus far placed against the subject property. As an alternative, we would request by resolution, a reimbursement of these costs by the future developer who takes on this project since they will benefit the project. The other request that we would like to make is that the costs of the storm sewer between Pheasant Meadows and Pheasant Glen be assessed to each adjacent parcel in an equitable manner given its joint benefit. Originally, Roger Hokanson agreed to its installation and payment given the purchase agreement with the Hursts. Since that purchase agreement has been nullified by an Anoka County judge, the decisions associated with that purchase agreement need to be addressed. Our hope is that Pheasant Glen will now pay its own costs for its own benefits. Please address these issues in the near future at a city council meeting so that they may be resolved. , ) 9174 Isanti Street N.E., Blaine, Minnesota 55449 (612) 786-3130. Fax (612) 784-9136 , I .' '\ ) . . and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to issue building permits to any property within the plat " until such time as such default has been corrected to the " satisfaction of the City. 14. STORM SEWER COST REIMBURSEMENT. The Developer agrees that in addition to its special assessmentit will pay the amount of Twenty-four Thousand Two Hundred Forty-five and no/lOa ($24,245.00) Dollars which represents that portion of the storm water drainage improvements which benefit property outside the Subdivision. The City agrees that at such time as it assesses and collects the Twenty-four Thousand Two Hundred Forty-five and no/lOa ($24,245.00) Dollars from the adjoining and benefited properties it will reimburse Developer such amount without interest. The Developer shall incur no additional costs in receiving such reimbursement. DEVELOPER CITY OF ANDOVER , INC. r~. (;,C I VQ By ').. I,', I'/l / t,..J~~ /1. E. McKelvey, Mayor V ATTEST: u~~tw Victoria Volk, Clerk By -14- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Mav 17. 1994 Discussion Item Dick Fursman, Administration APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t-O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM t-O. "No Parking" Signs/Cul-de-sac/ Woodland Creek 3rd ~ 1. The ballfields in back of Woodland Creek Elementary have been attracting parking in a cul-de-sac at the rear end of the ballfields. People corning to see the games are using a cul-de- sac as a parking lot much to the distress of the resident who lives at the end of the cul-de-sac. Individuals are also parking two and three deep next to a fire hydrant. When individuals park at the site they proceed over private property and cause damage. The individual property owner has contacted the police several times and has had little, if any, response. The property owner is requesting that the City post "resident parking only" signs in the cul-de-sac area. The resident has indicated they will be available for the meeting. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ / TO: I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING NO PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF EIDELWEISS STREET NW FROM l38TH LANE NW TO l39TH AVENUE NW. WHEREAS, the City Council is cognizant of the public nuisance, traffic hazard, congestion; and WHEREAS, the Council believes restricting the parking in the area will be a solution to the problem. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that Eidelweiss Street NW from l38th Lane NW to l39th Avenue NW be designated no parking. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of May , 19~. 17th CITY OF ANDOVER ~ i , J. E. McKelvey - Mayor ATTEST: victoria Volk - City Clerk / >-7 'I'I'..~L.~'''' J.; I , , . lY~1, , ~ ~jL_ ' ,_I. ~ ,k;"~', \~I'I ' I..~>-:-\ \\~ ; "",""~ I ' Ez- 11 ' I ' I"r.r". // .HJ' .,:',.- ,I ' 07 : !~ ~~A /.' % ~4":,~"; ii{ PhC'" : ~~~/ ~. i t't->------- ~'WL ; ~r~ ~~ ~ ~~ . ruf- .' ~ \ ~ CRffKRIDG<, ~~..~"./".. '7'''i''~, . m;T<;~\ ~' cr;.".i"'i';;';~ c~tlO '''~ I I I I I I . 000 I I- 1 II I ~: '".. 'r""' -Ii ,~~ I . ; I I I I 'h:W!CKsT";',,;r:r. . G~': ~ . " .h "r l' .... ~f9I!KJ~_I...I,1. J'f I ~. so'"' . ""N I '1 ,,- I ~~I. '. .j..I.I.-;q._ ""':' ' ~ ;T, """E' _, .. ".'" '00 01; - .::~.:..< / ----~. --0" .~'" 11~lrot;iJ:"II'-I' ."hl' ~~,~'--'~/" ,., ;;;:.~~ . ~ ., ,', ~/ 1 G I ~ '01. ,...,. '-"",."", " ..; " ': :: .. .' [. ,; . -.n.o;>,;" ,I'~I+I' , . . ';n-., ,. ., .';. ' Iii ,.. j,IWOOO' . '""" S~ ~.~., NOR" '').,v " " };l:J:" ~-,..:.;. , : I. ':' .. ; , ,,:.,'~ "'/'/."'" O\J~ fcf<', -~::": I'R+ I ,.I,..,.j., V"'::: .'. '.,/,.' :; :"'.;,. '.?;;~ ' '.I[~~ ~ ":':.. : f"~~:;;,~"~~ G ti ~iTlW," .If.... --'--./ffl ~;P;~ " ' .~.,;~: : ~. "~,.. _ .~". .:,:,:. .I~;/', "~~~" . .... '. ri: I ,'" ,m, I,r;~ . ." "00'" ;/~". r-.- .~~. I- . ',',.' , ". . l.frR;~j.'""" .;,c , .. ......I. ' . . f?7 "'. ' .It.. 1,"""'---"" Yo:&, , I. ,.::,:'." ,'" '"''''.'''i.f.I.''' "'. ~" ~.~ ~ .PL!(:l';&.. .... I~ '1'1>;"'1;1".;: ' :-,. : : , .:.~;~:rir=~--=' ~ r;~r'9.". -, '..., ':~.. ' , ....: "",' '=' .' ' . ~ ~ I,V:" '. '.,.'~ -t----- : I. W ..; . '::t';;.o~ ' I r= , . :: of ~ ' '<;,"I'=V'U. ,,: 'i'(.f ~~ I ~ ' ~~.:::,..''': ,.... - 1\ (I.'.,,';:":.":"'.:'~~ : f ~ I '1"'.'. ~ .' ",'." _ ~ 0:- ~~ :~." ~',''V?:. ' I fAr I\~ ~I!~ ; ;::j.c~'~ ~', :.,I':,~;= ~ : i Q . ,,"~:::...' '=' . '>- .rr--'d , It ~.5~: : :;~ . .'.',. . , 1 . .' '.::::: . { 1 'I 1 \~ -:- 10.0' '. n'" , ~'" 1 11 -:-1 n( 're: . .' -- -. L-.> ,.. "". ,'(. ...-- 1 11~~~1~~"I1-~i~,~ . ~D';~~JI"l' ~ c-J~J!.'..~: . ;~.:T~ '~J%':' .... ", ~ L Ilf L-:~' ,~..."I...,,':':I-::0~~. _ '>", .~ .;,.:~~JcoP{-' -i-Ji;,', ~.hl ~iz A 0 R f- .iP~N~ ,. , , . ~ {/' . .'f' 'ffJ-lLl:.' .,...., /. ...._l'f71"-' . , ." 'N . ' , ... I.w;!:;),." "SE -- f.- fffi'B"kJ. ;'i;,',~: . ''.;, . .".. ,'.,~ ~r~' 'o:;~ ..'T ,: 1--: ' t;' .~~.~ .t--=:' ~ ~" .. "~~f_1, ~.w,.,...J , ,... "'.c..~"'<!L n- 'r .","., .;+ ..}---'" " 2....,., ",. Un/' .. ~.: ','3" ,WAr , h- ,_ i" """._",,\'c ~'" +.i<2i<O =AFo. . v . ' ;;.I.~:~.' ~~:..0IjY:.~:u : : '''''1, ,'-J! ~"~~~~ 't'i-l='~.k ;;;.~ '.'" '~~~'I+f."m :..~~~EN I "'.:RES ~b~ .'w" __I' P -f--.I --=\\ \ \'\: .;.;. .'m,. . T "'" '. ;,y,,., " "..,H.' . .. ". " Il:';~'" ~ 8f"i ' ..;. .,~', k::R:-li ." - . D if:;; eLl ~ <T, I'i '";-."....<: .~I"'''''''", 'oJ'.' 'l'<:;l"llcl :i~ ~i~ q, /" ' / ~~. i'--'- ~I;;; .,..p;. < . ,'P ~ R< . ~ P.;: , ; ..,~~,.,," '" '.""-'NT" ,,".j~.:;; ~: .D'. T C z' '::' ..,'. ,'. .:, .' <' c;:) '::i:.. ' ! D. ,. 'e.... . ~ : ,. :" ;,;,: 'II,~ ~!' ,,~ '''EAOOw$ll\IlI s:, . '} ~ '-i~'.'''' ~'TH" ~:F.~;)'!U: c', I\:. ~ ~~ ' , >iiii-" ..... ~ "I'.~'..''''- "!Ir1I!.".".....," 'F~."j .=, . v;:~jrT11 ." ~ '.T-= :<..' .. , . I ' . " ' fli'. . ' 0 ;--c>. , ,. . ~ >*" ~~~~oo,~oo i~ .~\"If'/.1;\",,, .':,,: '''';' "'. ,L. G ID:' \ ..f.;-, T~". .., ""~: ~ :- ~ : .>'-~ i.: 1": ~t~O,I-'''~ ~ ;,F~, :~ ~ '---_~ 0- --,-=...,,'" ./....".....,15:0 : .\~. ...... - <"'".=...~lll"- ,'" . ! _MOL- _ .." Qo.'." ..... I L "61.~~ ~ ........... :; r.,...,......!.' ;."~" :....,.....~....I ,....~~: . -L..- -"L ~~ _ _ i .= _ '..1, V... ......., !.......,,.. --.,. '.-----,~ ...,,'..':'~ :..!-~.:"!L,.:;: :";,;'~..;i~.!:~ :..,U.~ , I KAOLEC" " ~ . 1I<5[~T;5 I- J~ 1\ ) :w ! I T' TRT" IF "' . / ,7 .~ f - ,,~ ~ ROUND LAKE 4~ l'>' I I I i .~ I I I"'" I '1' - ~ I [. ~, ;::::::i.'.'~:~' I LUN, +,i. P I I ''i ," . :4f: ';": ~ ". S' I i~~VERG. eN .~).~ ;; - - - - ~ !ot tif I I · !t~- I '0s~ :>~~ --~g I ~ ,'''~I~ III"""~D; "Ai ,17.1~1 KENSANGrON I I I c-" '1 10<1 ~ 'l'VI'~~~r'~"J" . "~. ) ' ,"";,,, If" ~ [ J 4 _ -J I I I I 1:'1' u ....{;.~ ~"';':"" .' ~~~ ~j r.~ , . I ~,:,.,.~! __ 1'\1 I I I I I I--- I I f-= ~ -~ Ji ~-II u I: Ii ,. J rATrStJ,,, o.L," J',P"'U'~ 3 "," -"" .~! ":'0 I . .' ) ~ ----- OJ.:t.z", .......'.,leO;fg ~y ~{\(L'\- ~ Z 30 Z .1.33HS S.1.33HS "r~ ~ .~) ~ 'i IS'Zl-.;:- ....ti:.'O.8ZS , , :-" l", ...., ..~ .... ~ ;:j ~:-J t::; ~I) ) !"Oo) )~ ~ t~ ..... .~ '- .... ... <: \. ~,' .... ~~6" "'~&6'~~ :Ie.?",., '\ ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE May 17, 1994 EDA Meeting Dick Fursman, Administration APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t-O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM 110. BY: Expand TIF District ~ t. staff is requesting a discussion on the merits of expanding the Tax Increment Financing District and the modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Some of the reasons to consider expanding the tax increment financing project area are as follows. There are many eligible projects throughout the City which have not been discussed. streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewers and other assessable public improvement costs could be financed with the use of tax increment financing dollars provided the project area were expanded. Presently there are simply not enough resources within the City to keep up with intrastructure requirements such as roads and parks. Expanding the tax increment financing project area would allow the City to put the funds to use. The Economic Development Authority should consider acting soon as the tax increment financing law has been changing and is likely to continue to change throughout the next few years. The processes which allow for the expansion of the tax increment financing project area may not be available in future years or may not be available without County approval. Jim Casserly and Mary Molzahn have provided a memo on the uses of tax increment as requested by staff. The memo addresses the use of tax increments in the park, spending limitations expanding the TIF district and the use of Tax increment dollars on intrastructtire. Through this discussion staff is requesting permission to proceed with Bill Hawkins to expand the tax increment financing area and to develop a list of eligible activities for such an area. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: 612-334-3382 CASSERLY MOLZAHN 107 P02 MAY 12'94 11:06 Casserly Molzahn & Associates, Inc. 215 South 11th Street, Suite 300 · Minneapolis · Minnesota 55403 Office (612) 342.22n · Fax (612) 334-3382 MEMORANDUM TO: Andover Economic Development Authority f"ROM: James R. Casserly Mary E. Mo1z:tlhn DATE: May 12, 1994 RE: Uses of Tax ~ncrement , \ .i We have been asked to respond to several i~5ue5 regarding variou~ uses of the EOA's existing tax increment funds, the modification of the EOA's Development Program and the modification of the EDA's tax increment financing districts ("TIF Districts"). 1. Can the EDA fund site preparation costs in its commercia~ TIF District which will also benefit the development of a City park (the Field of Dreams Park)? Yes. The EDA can fund both the site preparation costs and park improvement costs. The cost of site preparation is one of the traditional uses of tax increment and assisting the park development only enhances the public purpose. Given the situation that the commercial TIF District needs soils which are available at the park 5tte, the improvement of the park is incidental to the improvement of the commercial TIF District. If the park improvement project were in the Development District (the "Project Area") and part of the EDA's Development Program, then tax increment and EDA funds could pay for the park improvements costs. There would be no reason to connect the site improvements for the commercial TIF District with the park improvements. In this instance the park is benefiting because of the improvements to the commercial TIF Distriot. " ) 612-334-3382 CASSERLY MOLZAHN 107 P03 MAY 12'94 11:06 2: Are the EDA1s TIF Districts currently subject to any limitations as to the percentage of tax increment that can be spent outside the TIF Districts? / No. There are no percentage 1imitations imposed on the existing T1F Districts. Because Andover has a pooled Development Program and the TIF Districts were certified prior to May 1, 1990, all tax increment is available for any eligible expense anywhere within the Froject Area, if the expenditures are identified in the Development Program. (The Development Program establishes the Project Area, identifies the amounts and types of expenditures and establishes development and redevelopment goals.) 3. Is it possible to expand the geographic area of an existing TIF District? Yes. An existing TIF District can be modified. Any modification, however, mus~ mee~ the requirements of existing law, not the law in effect when the TIF District was originally created. In order to expand a redevelopment TIF District the EDA must meet the criteria for the creation of a new redevelopment TlF District. The advantage of modifying an exigting TIF District is that the City can use all the tax increments generated from the expanded TIF District anywhere within the entire TIF District. If a new TIF District is created, only 25' of the tax increment generated in that District can be spent outeide of the TIF District itself. The expansion of an existing redev~lopment TIF District or the creation of a new redevelopment TIF District requires approximately 60 days. Are infrastructure improvements e1igible tax increment expenditures? 4. Yes. Infrastructure improvements are traditional tax increment expenditures. Without infrastructure (sewer, water, roads, etc.) a community cannot develop or redevelop. Any infrastructure expenditures must be identified and the amounts estimated in the Development Program, and are only allowable in the Project Area. As indicated above, the project Area describes where tax increment funds may be spent; the ~!F District identifies where the funds are generated. All TIF Districts mu~t be in a Project Area. If the City is simply unable to develop or redevelop itself, then tax increment may be the only funds available to assist with its activities. If there are any additional questions, please give a call. We are reviewing your Development Program, project Area and the feasibility of modifying an ED~ TIF District. In addition, we will provide you with further information regarding the use of the EDA in assisting the City with other development and expansion objectives. , ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Mav 17, 1994 EDA Meeting Dick Fursman, Administration APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t-O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM t-O. Order Plans & Specs/Commercial park/94-13 BY~ ? Included with this item is a resolution ordering the improvement of pond construction and regrading of lots in the Andover Commercial Park. As was described in preceding meetings, the Andover Commercial Park has two feet of topsoil which is unbuildable. An agreement has been reached with Aircon Electric to build in the industrial park. When soil borings were looked at it was found that the soils needed correcting. The City sold the lots to Aircon with the assumption that the lots had been graded to plan which called for three inches of topsoil, ~ot two feet. An excess amount of stable material has been located at the park with plans to mine the material from the Field of Dreams park and substitute the granular material for the organic material. Recommendation staff recommends passage of the resolution ordering pond construction and regrading of lots in the Andover Commercial Park. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Andover Economic Development Authority member to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF POND CONSTRUCTION AND REGRADING OF LOTS , PROJECT NO. 94-13 IN THE ANDOVER COMMERCIAL PARK AREA AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Andover Economic Development Authority of the City of Andover to hereby order improvement project No. 94-13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Andover Economic Development Authority of the City of Andover to hereby designate TKDA as the Engineer for this improvement and they are directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements. MOTION seconded by EDA member and adopted by day of the EDA at a regular meeting this 17th May , 19 94 , with EDA members voting in favor of the resolution, and EDA members voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - president Richard Fursman - Executive Director / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 EDA Meeting Dick Fursman, Administration APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t'O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM t'O. Andover park Complex *2/ Commercial Park \0.. : J BY: ,;.l..-' It}. As part of the soils correction plan for the Andover Commercial Park soils will be taken from Andover park Complex *2 near City Hall. This option was discussed with the Park Board during a joint Park Board/City Council meeting. The intent is to use excess granular materials from the park to assist in the leveling and grading of Andover Park Complex *2. Several questions concerning the options were discussed at the park Board/City Council joint meeting. * Bill Hawkins forwarded the question of limitations to Jim Casserly. Mr. Casserly has indicated that the use of tax increment financing funds as described for park correction and for the correction of the Andover commercial area would be appropriate. * TKDA will do test drillings on the site and have the soil tested for its ability to support grass growth. * TKDA will monitor the grading and staking at Andover Park Complex *2 as a donation to the park. * The amount of soil to be removed from the commercial area and the amount of soil to be removed from the Field of Dreams park will be forthcoming upon the approval of the EDA for the concept as described. CONTINUED MOTION BY: SECOND BY: , I I TO: If the EDA approves using the Field of Dreams park for soils to correct the commercial area, the following work items will be coordinated: _ A final grading plan for the Field of Dreams complex will be submitted. _ Soils will be extracted and tested from .the commercial park. _ Granular material will be extracted from the Field of Dreams area. _ Granular material will be transported to the commercial park for soil correction and compaction. _ The ball fields will be graded according to the approved plan. _ Topsoil from the commercial area will be desposited and graded at the ballfields. _ volunteers will be organized to install the sprinkler system. _ Grass and sod will be planted as required within 14 days following grading. \ J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 EDA Meeting Dick Fursman, Administration APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t-O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM t-O. Purchase of Auto salvage Yards B~ I/. Recent developments having a direct and indirect impact on the Bunker Lake area are giving a new opportunity to examine the feasibility of purchasing auto salvage yards. The available tax increment financing money for the area continues to grow as was reported earlier. The Mayor has had an opportunity to discuss the disposition of several auto salvage yards in regards to selling at this time. Thus far the response has been positive. For a variety of reasons several owners of auto salvage yards feel it is a good time to get out of the business, move on or sell. In a related matter, the pumpkin City site will become available sometime in the fall once the EPA releases the site. The only auto salvage yard north of Bunker has indicated interest in moving to the south side of Bunker with the remaining auto salvage yards if an area can be made available. If this were to become a possibility, a large building would be constructed to move a significant portion of the auto salvage operation indoors. This would free up approximately 20 acres of general business property on the north side of Bunker for redevelopment. Staff is requesting permission to begin pursuing strategies for the reduction in the number of salvage yard acres in the aforementioned area. To this end the following work items are requested: 1. Identify auto salvage yards interested in negotiating with the City. 2. Obtain appraisals on the property identified. 3. Review all environmental data on the sites. 4. prepare a report for the Council. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA SECnON ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED rn Discussion FOR AGENDA ITEM Planning ~ rn septic Inspection \t Discussion David L. Carlberg City Planner 1;1 . The City Council is requested to discuss the Metropolitan Council's requirement of biennial inspections of on-site septic systems. The City Council on April 20, 1993, adopted an amendment to Ordinance No. 37, On-Site Septic System Ordinance, which requires each on-site septic system to be inspected biennially by a certified inspector. Attached is a copy of the amendment, 37D. The Council needs to discuss the issue of staffing for the inspections and the fees associated with the program. MOTION BY: . SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 37D AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE DESIGN, EVALUATION, INSTALLATION, 6eNS~RYe~~eNT A~~ERA~~eNT E*~ENS~eNT REPA~R AN9 KA~N~ENAN6E PUMPING, OR INSPECTION OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE 9~SpeSA~ TREATMENT SYSTEMS: REQUIRING PERMITS FOR AND LICENSING OF PERSONS ENGAGED IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND SERVICING THEREOF: PROVIDING FOR THE INSPECTION OF SUCH SYSTEMS, AND THE ABATEMENT OF NUISANCES: PROVIDING FOR THE INSPECTION OF PRIVATE WATER SYSTEMS, AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF: IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER, COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No. 37 is hereby amended as follows: SECTION 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS. E. Surface Disposal Field. 7. Maintenance. a. Each property owner having an on-site sewage disposal system shall have the system inspected on a e!-aRRHal biennial basis by an inspector certified by the Minnesota Pollution Control A enc MPCA) and file a copy 0 t e 1nspect10n ma:R~eRaRee report on ~Ra~ the system with the 6!~Y 61e~k Building Official. b. The City is divided into two (2) areas for the purposes of biennial fe!-aRRHalt reporting by property owners. The areas west of CSAH No. 9 shall report on odd years and the area east of CSAH No. 9 on even years. (37A, 9-07-76) c. Each property owner , d. The City requires that each property owner has liis on-site sewage disposal system pumped as often as required by inspections, as stated in Section2(E), Subsection 7 d. Failure on the part of the property owner to have an on-site sewage disposal system cleaned when said system is found to require cleaning shall be cause for the City to provide for the cleaning service and provide the property owner with an advance notification of the date the system will be cleaned. The cost of this service shall be assessed to the property owner. (37B, 9-19-78) , / page 19 e. The basis for determining if septic tank cleaning Ts needed is the measurement of the depth of sludge and scum in the septic tank. When, as a result of such measurement, the top of the sludge layer in the tank or any compartment of the tank is found to be less than twelve (12") inches below the bottom of the outlet baffle or submerged pipe or if the bottom of the scum layer is less than three (3") inches above the bottom of the outlet baffle or submerged pipe, the owner or agent shall arrange for the removal and sanitary disposal of the contents of the tank. f. Individual servicing of septic tanks and soil absorption units shall require a permit from the City and shall conform to the Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency specifications. Disposal of sludge and scum removed from the system shall be into a municipal sewer disposal system at a disposal site approved by the Building Official. ~. Owners of sanitary disposal systems shall be required to cooperate with and assist the City in taking water samples, as required, to test the adequacy of such systems. SECTION 4. LICENSES. A. Licensing. ) or corporation shall j 3. Applicant shall file with the City Clerk policies of public liability and property damage insurance which shall remain in force and effect during the entire term of said license and which shall contain a provision that they shall not be canceled without ten (10) days written notice to the City. Public liability insurance shall not be less than one hundred thousand ($100,000) dollars for injuries including accidental death to anyone (1) person and subject to the same limit for each person in an amount of not less than three hundred thousand ($300,000) dollars on account to any one (1) accident, and property damage insurance in the amount of not less than fifty thousand ($50,000) dollars for each accident and not less than one hundred thousand ($100,000) dollars aggregated. No work shall be done under license until said insurance policies have been filed and approved by the City. , page 20 4. Licenses shall be renewed annually. The annual license !ee shall be as set by city council Resolution. Applications for such license shall be made annually on a form furnished by the city Clerk. Licenses shall be in effect from January 1 to December 31 of that year. (31C, 11-06-90) 5. Application for licenses shall be filed with the city Clerk and shall be reviewed and subject to the approval of the City. 6. Any installation, construction, alteration or repair of a sewage disposal system by a licensee in violation of any provision of this Ordinance or refusal on the part of a licensee to correct such defective work shall be cause for revocation of or refusal to renew a license. said license may be revoked or its renewal refused, the licensee shall be given a hearing by the city council to show cause why such license should not be revoked or refused. Notice of the time, place and purpose of such hearing shall be in writing. SECTION 5. COMPLIANCE, PENALTIES AND VALIDITY. A. com~liance. The inspection reporting procedure as defined in Section (E)1 shall be effective as of January 1, 1994, to allow the City of Andover to establish the implementation and notification procedure. B. Penalties. , ) 1. Any person found to be violating any provision of this ordinance shall be served by the Building Official with written notice stating the nature of the violation and providing a reasonable time limit for the satisfactory correction thereof. The offender shall within the period of time stated in such notice, permanently cease all violations. 2. Any person, firm, cor~o:ation or voluntary association which violates any prov1S10n of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as defined by State Law. (31C, 11-06-90) 3. Any person violating any of the ordinance shall become liable to the loss or damage occasioned the City violation. provisions City for any by reason of this expense, of such C. Validity. 1. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. , 2. The invalidity of any section, clause, provision of this ordinance shall not affect the any other part of this ordinance which can be without such invalid part or parts. sentence or validity of given effect / 3. In the event any word, phrase, section is found to be in conflict with this ordinance, the most restrictive apply. sentence, clause or the provisions of interpretation shall page 21 / Adopted by the city Council of the City of Andover this 20th day of April, 1993. ATTEST: t:t. ~4 V1Ct~ Vo , City '\ / Clerk Page 22 CITY OF ANDOVER . t. M;(k CITY OF ANDOVER / REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION May 17, 1994 DATE staff, Committee, Commission Planning ~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA 1'0. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM 1'0. Equestrian Council Resignation & Appointment David L. Carlberg, City Planner BY: ~v /3. REQUEST The Andover City Council is asked to accept the resignation of Ernest Trettel from the Andover Equestrian Council and appoint Dean Olson to fill the position. Mr. Olson will finish Mr. Trettel's term which will expire December 31, 1994. \ ; MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: . ,. n Fe E,'if1.l"!f.1') March 27, 1994 " APR 28 1994 Andover Equestrian Council Andover City Council /' CITY ~~r "."'" "./ \I':::R I, Ernest W. Trettel, wish to resign as a member of the Andover Equestrian Council. My normal term ends December 31, 1994 and I would wish to resign effective immediately. I would highly recommend Dean Olson 2S my temporary/permanent replacement, Dean has many years of experience as a horse owner and has care for and worked with horses many years also. Dean also has experience with draft horses. I sincerely hope that the Andover Equestrian Council and the Andover City Council will approve Dean as a member of the Andover Equestrian Council. i , ~vV$?/ Ernest W. Trettel 1412 Andover Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 " , ) RECEiVED , , (t:;; ,1'\. , , ...... -', .'-:.;::~ APR 28 1994 CITY of ANDOVER Ci"1 Y ',_' .-.1 " '" .~:::R " ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION Name :$ft /f/ OLS O",,/' Address: (.3.~ J H N pH? C'- ').<; L1 ) Home Phone: ~ 22,.-oL.f57 Work Phone: $7" q 1-1 0-5 0 ] Cf Commission Preference: Planning & zoning park & Recreation Economic Development Charter Commission Public Safety Committee Equestrian council~ Cable Comm. Tree Commission Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory commission checked above: Describe your education/experience on this commission: J.. G i4A/ 4 e 2-P t.O i1 H- I H El.f!. t.-tft fHv() To P~I/<'N'T PRofllJn't1 which qualifies you to serve /3.ee..i1,4SF ~ 1.. F-e-el- TH-p J f P~GI~1,E"1YI'5 T )fA-i Co WI ~ L J.J ~ v< CJ'-U <..~f) HoR.'Str) Foil mfl#7 v-c,,+Ps /:I '.h4v<t1 tvell}</.jD LVii" I-(f)p,'.vc- 57 tt-6J.-E"S d- /So ttf?O,'MC- "5 7~R)/.;!"s 0 IV rnA}u= 1,1/(, 1J.-}.r"vr;:s ~77?,1{ fuO ;="Sr1tr"~ FeR aoT)7 HeirSiT'S + O.:v~IA~.~. FaR S't-<H~'5 Describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to this commission: .:r woR/C. Pn-R., T,'~~ Ii" A5 13 Fill? t1. i~~ I Aft/D fit.. SC H-et-P 01..<7 , f+ T t? a <;p-J,A-<..vA/ '5"1".6 LJ; .+ .PI1.vpel\. C M~};" 0 F He RS~J Da ted: 3 - / S - Cf J.-I f ~q>1/~i:n H,'I/.';) 57j4{3l.b-.. 1ff1J.c}}.,'4/'C- rJ- RiDt.:",'An:- S/<,.L..L's / Q.,J'. h.....A../ 0.-e/).-p.-r/l / , 19nature - f;.-I) .s , , / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON DATE May 17, 1994 Reports of Staff, Committees, Commis"'inn'" Dick Fursman, Administration APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM f\D. Approval to Hire Engineering Intern BY: I _ ~L kr- /.:5. Background Staff is requesting that the Council consider approving the hiring of an engineering intern to work June, July and August with Todd Haas. An engineering intern would be responsible for a variety of tasks which would free up the engineer to do a backlog of assignments. The Personnel Committee met and recommended approval for the engineering intern. Notices have been sent to engineering colleges for the posting of an intern ad. It is anticipated an intern will be paid at the rate between $8.00-$10.00 hour. The job description with listed duties is attached. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: c.. '- ""~~,,,.~ (CA) .~... .,,;l' ~~"':::t'~~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 May 5, 1994 Don Anderson NDSU Department of Civil Engineering CIE 201 Fargo, ND 58105 Re: Engineering Aide Dear Don: ) As we discussed with you over the phone, we are looking to fill the position of an Engineering Aide for the 1994 construction season. If you have any graduate civil engineering students that have an interest, please have the graduate send a resume to my office by Friday, May 20, 1994. The position will pay between $8.00-$10.00 an hour. a position description for your use. please call me questions at (612)755-5100. I have included if you have any Sincerely, .7nt/~~ Todd J. Haas Assistant City Engineer TJH:rja Encl. c. CITY OF ANDOVER POSITION DESCRIPTION POSITION TITLE: Engineering Aide Engineering Assistant City Engineer DEPARTMENT: ACCOUNTABLE TO: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To perform a wide variety of engineering related office or field work, to ensure accurate and up-to-date engineering pla?s, information and records. MAJOR AREAS OF ACCOUNTABILITY As assigned, performs easement preparation, checking and recording in a complete and accurate manner updates plan, plats and half-section documents and ensures that they are done completely and in an accurate manner. _ Prepares blueprints and maps for other City Departments and ensure that they are done completely and accurately. \ Assists in field surveys or inspections of in-place streets and / utilities as assigned. Communicates with citizens relative to public works projects to ensure understanding of the nature of the project and City responsibility. _ Screens and resolves at the counter and via telephone requests for information and corrective action in a manner which will maintain a positive image of the City. Communicates the City'S standards or other information to consultants, ~ngineers and developers as they relate to the installation of utilities and other improvements, to ensure smooth installation of such facilities and positive cooperation between developers and the City. Performs related work as apparent or assigned. \ ) ~L~~ ~c~ :lei Page 1 of 2 ~ KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, ABILITIES Overall competence determined by ability to accept and perform any responsibility contained in the position write-up. Technical skills and ability in engineering, related drawings, operations and calculations may be determined by the accuracy and capacity to perform such work at various levels of difficulty. Ability to deal effectively with the public, contractors and City personnel may be gauged by the numbers and types of feedback received. QUALIFICATIONS \ ) working knowledge of maps, preliminary plat and final plat review, construction procedures, materials and equipment. Ability to develop and maintain positive and effective working relationships with employees, contractors, consultants and the general public. Must be able to communicate effectively graphically, orally and in writing. Must possess valid Minnesota drivers license. Civil Engineering student finishing junior or senior year. , ) Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 Reports of Staff, Committees, '"'. . c:c:; nnc: Dick Fursman, Administration APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t'-O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT .. ..) ITEM t'-O. Reclassify Building Inspector position ~~. /6. Request The City Council is requested to reclassify Don Olson from the position of Building Inspector to the position of Assistant Building Official. Background The Personnel Committee met Tuesday, May 3, 1994 to discuss several issues including reclassifying one of the Building Inspectors to become the Assistant Building Official. Department head David Almgren has indicated that Don Olson should be an Assistant Building Official and be put in charge of the Building Department when Mr. Almgren is not present. The two Building Inspectors are close to the same rate of pay even though Don Olson has been with the City about five more years. Presently Don Olson assumes the responsibilities of Building Official when Mr. Almgren is absent. Recommendation It is the recommendation of staff and the Personnel Committee that the position presently held by Don Olson as Building Inspector be upgraded to the position of Assistant Building Official. with the recommendation of advancing Don Olson to Assistant Building Official comes the understanding that the additional responsibilities will result in additional salary consideration for 1995. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ j TO: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION May 17, 1994 DATE AGENDA t-.O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion Items ITEM t-.O. Adopt Resolution SWMCB Environmental Procurement policies Continued Daryl E. Sulander Finance Directo~ ftL /8. REQUEST The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution promoting the waste reduction, recycling and landfill abatement practices to be followed by the City as recommended by the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board (SWMCB). BACKGROUND \ ) The Anoka County Board adopted the Solid Waste Management Charge Appeal Process on April 12, 1994. The City of Andover is eligible for a 40% reduction in the solid waste fees charged for 1994. By adopting the attached resolution and following the SWMCB "Environmentally Responsible procurement policies", the City will be eligible for an additional 20% reduction of the solid waste fees. The solid waste fees charged for 1994 are as follows: City Property 1994 Fee Billed 40% Reduction 20% Reduction Ci ty Hall Public Works Fire Station 1 Fire Station 2 $ 259.72 259.72 259.72 259.72 $ 103.89 103.89 103.89 103.89 $ 51. 94 51. 94 51. 94 51. 94 All departments will be expected to implement procedures for waste reduction.and procurement practices outlined in the 'Resourceful Waste Management' guide published for businesses by the metro area recycling programs. A copy of the guide is available in my office. The 'procurement policies' adopted by the SWMCB are attached for your information. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: '\ I TO: SWMCB Resolution page 2 Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board Environmentally Responsible Procurement policies Adopted October 28, 1992 1. The acquisition, use, maintenance, and discard of materials will maximize resource conservation options to avoid and reduce waste generation. Resource discard decisions should be made based on a decision pyramid, recognizing that there may be other indirect public health, safety and environmental impacts. 2. Procurement practices will maximize purchase of recycled content products in order to stimulate the development of stable markets for recycled materials. 3. Procurement practices will include consideration of total product cost as selection criterion. Total product cost will include consideration of packaging waste, hazardous characteristics of the product, hazardous characteristics of waste generated as a result of the intended .use of the product, recyclability, and disposal costs as well as durability and recycled content. 4. procurement practices will continue to support and utilize existing cooperative purchasing programs and to expand cooperative purchasing activities where practicable. , \ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NO. R A RESOLUTION PROMOTING THE GOALS OF WASTE REDUCTION, RECYCLING AND LANDFILL ABATEMENT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF ANDOVER, THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Andover acknowledges the benefit to the city, its citizens, the public health and the environment resulting from the Anoka County Integrated Solid Waste Management System; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has established a hierarchy of preferred waste management practices, set forth in Minnesota statutes 115A.02 and incorporated into Anoka County's Solid waste Management Master plan, encouraging waste reduction and recycling as the highest priority for the State with the goal of abating the use of landfills; and WHEREAS, the City of Andover wishes to promote the goals of \ waste reduction, recycling and landfill abatement in order to . / protect its citizens, the public health and the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Andover agrees to use its best efforts to recycle 50% of the waste generated on its tax exempt properties and to reduce the amount and toxicity of the waste it generates by implementing policies adopted by the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board on October 28, 1992. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of May , 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER Attest: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor victoria Volk - City Clerk \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 Finance APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Reserve Fund Balances Year End 1993 Daryl E. suland~/O~ B~: .'~ Finance Directory!' ~ /9. REQUEST The Andover City Council is requested to reserve the fund balance as of December 31, 1993 in each fund maintained by the city according to the policy established February 19, 1991. BACKGROUND The city Council has authorized the expenditure of certain funds received in 1992 to be expended in 1993, and funds received in \ 1993 which were expended in 1994. Also, the activity in the P.I.R. I Fund resulted in a net decrease in fund balance, which should be designated according to P.I.R. Fund Policy. The 1992 reservation of fund balance in the General Fund for the North Metro Mayor's Assoc. in the amount of $3,000 was expended in 1993 and will be liquidated. The defibrillation equipment purchase paid with the May 3, 1994 claims, was authorized from the P.I.R. Fund on October 19, 1993. In addition, the other 1993 activity in the P.I.R. Fund resulted in a decrease in the designation for Equipment of $22,763.16 and a decrease in the designation for capital projects of $302,960.13. The decrease in the Capital projects Account will be offset as $452,000 of special assessments are paid from levies transferred from the matured 1990A temporary bond issue. A separate account has been established in the Water Fund in the amount of $25,000 as adopted by the 1993 Water Fund Budget to designate a reserve for capital maintenance. The remaining retained earnings of the Water Fund are classified as unreserved. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ) TO: Reserve Fund Balances page 2 / The Fund Balance for the new central Equipment Fund will be classified as 'unreserved Retained Earnings/Designated'. These funds will b~ accumulated for replacement of existing equipment, thereby reducing and eventually replacing the use of Equipment Certificate Bonds. The Fund Balance for the new Risk Management Fund will also be classified as 'Unreserved Retained Earnings/Designated'. These funds will be accumulated to fund the City's payroll/personnel liability resulting from earned and unused vacation and sick leave payable at separation. The 12/31/93 balance of $5,911 is well short of the City's liability of $83,162 which excludes $9,650 payable by the Water and Sewer operating Funds. All other City Funds will be reserved as per the City Policy on Reservations and Designations of Year End Fund Balance. , I J Reserve Fund Balances Page 3 12/31/93 SCHEDULE OF FUND BALANCE RESERVES AND DESIGNATIONS , l Fund Name General G.O. Fire Bonds 1977A Bonds 1978 Bonds 1979 Bonds 1985A Bonds 1985B Bonds 1986A Bonds 1986B Bonds 1986C Bonds 1989A Bonds 1991B Bonds 1992 Bonds 1993A Bonds 1984 State Aid 1988 State Aid TIF 1-2 Bonds TIF 1-1 Bonds TIF.Bonds 93B Water Trunk Sewer Trunk State Aid Proj Park Dedication TIF 1-1 Const TIF 1-2 Const City Bldg Fund Kelsey Park 1992 Equip Bonds 1992 Const proj 1993 Const Proj P. 1. R. Fund P.I.R. Fund Water Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund Central Equip Risk Management Administrative Trust Fund \ / Reserve/Designation Designated for working Capital Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Reserved for Debt Service Designated for Capital Projects Designated for Capital Projects Designated for capital Projects Designated for Capital Projects Designated for Capital Projects Designated for Capital Projects Designated for Capital projects Designated for Capital Projects Designated for Equipment Designated for Capital projects Designated for Capital projects Designated for Equipment Designated for capital Projects Retained Earnings Designated for Capital Maintenance Unreserved Retained Earnings Unreserved Retained Earnings Retained Earnings Designated for Equipment Replacement Retained Earnings Designated for Compensated Absences Reserved for Assessment Administration Amount $ 849,653 7,158 712,276 138,492 76,487 186,012 8,793 1,081,472 14,361 1,774,639 1,001,334 1,811,224 3,594,539 125,212 368 8,272 126,671 105,742 35,248 1,014,984 357,297 468,376 191,227 1,035,134 518,193 60,288 43,100 118,938 869,520 1,287,613 156,120 413,811 25,000 485,876 382,259 72,539 5,911 151,192 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda Todd J. Haas, Engineering $' APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t-O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM t-O. Approve Final plat/Woodland Creek 4th Addition v ~O. The City Council is requested to approve the final plat for Woodland Creek 4th Addition. The final plat is in compliance with the preliminary plat. Drainage and utility easements will be reviewed prior to filing of plat. It is recommended that the plat be approved subject to the following: 1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title opinion. 2. security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs to be determined by the City Engineer. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site is completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots and streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and approved or revisions thereof by the City. 4. The final plat not be signed by the Mayor and Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total costs for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.}) and a contract for the improvements awarded. 5. street light costs to be paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative. Costs to be determined by Anoka Electric Cooperative. CONTINUED MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ) TO: ; \ . ) 6. Park dedication has been previously paid in full. 7. Receipt of all necessary drainage and utility easements outside the plat. 8. The developer will need to provide easements or some other legal document acceptable to the City of Andover which will guarantee the maintenance and use of the Woodland Creek Golf Course ponds and drainage system. 9. Submit a revised preliminary plat, grading/drainage and erosion control plan as required by the Andover Review Committee prior to filing of final plat to Anoka County. Note: City staff will be working with the developer to ensure all the necessary drainage and utility easements have been shown on the final plat along with additional drainage and utility easements outside the plat. \ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF WOODLAND CREEK 4TH ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Woodland Creek 4th Addition ; and WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of Woodland Creek 4th Addition I WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed such plat for conformance with the preliminary plat; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final plat of Woodland Creek 4th Addition contingent upon receipt of the following: 1. The City Attorney presents a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs as determined by the City Engineer. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site is completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots and streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and approved by the City. 4. The final plat is not to be signed by the Mayor and Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.}) and a contract for improvements awarded. 5. Street light costs to be paid to Anoka Electric cooperative. 6. Park dedication has been previously paid in full. 7. Receipt of all necessary drainage and utility easements outside the plat. 8. The developer will need to provide easements or some other legal document acceptable to the City of Andover which will guarantee the maintenance and use of the woodland Creek Gold Course ponds and drainage system. Submit a revised preliminary plat, grading/drainage and erosion control plan as required by the Andover Review Committee prior to filing of final plat to Anoka County. 9. \ ) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED citing the following: 1. Developer is responsible to obtain all permits from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, LGU, Coon Creek watershed District, MPCA or any other agency that is interested in the site. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of , 19 94 . May ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \ / '\ ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Mav 17. 1994 Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda Todd J. Haas, Engineering '/ APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA t\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM 1\0. Approve Final plat/Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition ~ .:11. The City Council is requested to approve the final plat for Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition. The final plat is in compliance with the preliminary plat. Drainage and utility easements will be reviewed prior to filing of plat. It is recommended that the plat be approved subject to the , following: I 1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs to be determined by the City Engineer. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site is completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots and streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and approved or revisions thereof by the City. 4. The final plat not be signed by the Mayor and Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total costs for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.}) and a contract for the improvements awarded. 5. Street lights costs to be paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative- Costs to be determined by Anoka Electric Cooperative. CONTINUED MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: 6. Park dedication to be land. 7. Receipt of all necessary drainage and utility easements outside the plat. Note: city staff will be working with the developer to ensure all the necessary drainage and utility easements have been shown on the final plat along with additional drainage and utility easements outside the plat. I \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. I A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 5TH ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY TONY EMMERICH CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition ; and WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of Bunker Lake 5th Addition Hills of WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed such plat for conformance with the preliminary plat; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final plat of Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition contingent upon receipt of the following: 1. The City Attorney presents a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs as determined by the City Engineer. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site is completed, a letter from the developer'S engineer that lots and streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and \ approved by the City. I 4. The final plat is not to be signed by the Mayor and Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.}) and a contract for improvements awarded. 5. Street light costs to be paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative. 6. Receipt of all necessary drainage and utility easements outside the plat. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED citing the following: 1. Developer is responsible to obtain all permits from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, LGU, Coon Creek Watershed District, MPCA or any other agency that is interested in the site. 2. Park dedication to be land as determined by Ordinance 10, Section 9.07. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of May , 19 94 . CITY OF ANDOVER , , ) J. E. McKelvey - Mayor ATTEST: Victoria volk - City Clerk / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Mav 17. 1994 AGENDA !\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion Items ITEM t\O. Admin. Approve Assessment Abatements ( .1 v. Volk DD' )~ 0/,). The City Council is requested to approve the abatement of special assessments for Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Pheasant Meadows. The properties were incorrectly assessed under project 92-18. Attached are copies of the abatement applications that will require County Board approval after Council approval. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: f'Qrm No. 1273 - Commissioner of Revenue Abatemenl Form 4 (Rev. 5/90) Poucher, Mpls. APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT. GENERAL FORM (M.S. 375.192) / .. "- g 'ti ::l <C >. C il ci uz For Taxes levied in 19_ '0 >. C il u and Payable in 19~ Please print or type. Applicant"S Name ~.; t:y o~ A.D..=IQV8- Applicant's Social Securily Number Telephone (worl<) (612) 7S5 51nO Telephone (home) ( ) Applicant's Mailing Address 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I Property to, or Parcel Number: Street Address (if different than above) 34 32 24 43 0005 City or Township Andover School District No. 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot I, Block I, Pheasant Meadows ASSESSOR'S ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE: Land $ ) APPUCANrS STATEMENT OF FACTS: Structures $ Total $ . Class Property was incorrectly assessed under City Project 92-18 (Fund 2206) APPUCANT'S REQUEST Abate special assessments certified to 1994 taxes and all future assessments under this Fund. Property owner has paid the first half taxes and the amount of the assessments paid will need to be refunded to the property owner. , ) NOTE: Applicant's Signature Date Minnesota Statutes 1988, Section 609.41, 'Whoever, in making any statement. oral or wrillen; which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of impOSing, reducing, or abating any tax or assessment. intentionally makes any statement as to any material mailer which the maker of this statement knows is false may be sentenced, unless otherwise provided by law, to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a line of not more than 53,000, or both.. Form No. 1273 - CommIssioner of Revenue Abatement Form 4 (Rev. 5/90) Poucher, Mpls. APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT. GENERAL FORM (M.S. 375.192) .. "- g 'ti ..l "0 >. >. 'E 'E il ci il uz u For Taxes levied in 19_ and Payable in 19~ Please print or type. Applicant's Name Ci tv of Andover Applicant's Social Securily Number Telephone (worl<) (612) 755-5100 Telephone (home) ( ) Applicant's Mailing Address 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. Andover, MN 55304 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I Propeny to. or Parcel Number: Street Address (if different than above) . 34 32 24 43 0007 City or Township . Andover School District No. 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 3, Block 1, Pheasant Meadows ASSESSOR'S ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE: Land $ Structures $ Total $ . Class APPUCANrS STATEMENT OF FACTS: Property was incorrectly assessed under City Project 92-19 (Fund 2206). APPUCANT'S REQUEST Abate special assessments certified to 1994 taxes and all future assessments under this fund. Propety owner has paid the first half taxes and the amount assessments will need to be refunded to the property owner. of the , ) NOTE: Applicant's Signature Date Minnesota Statutes 1988, Section 609.41, "Whoever, in making any statement. oral or written; which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of impOSing, reducing, or abating any1ax or assessment. intentionally makes any statement as to any material mailer which the maker of this statement knows is false may be sentenced, unless otherwise provided by law, to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both." CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA t\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J. Haas, Engineering ~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda ITEM 1\0, Accept Feasibility Report/94-3/ 140th Lane ~JJ ~,j. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution recelvlng feasibility report and calling public hearing for the improvement of project 94-3 for street and storm sewer construction in the area of 140th Lane NW from Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition to prai rie Road NW. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. / MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ON IMPROVEMENTS OF STREET AND STORM PROJECT NO. 94-3 IN THE l40TH LANE LAKE 5TH ADDITION TO PRAIRIE ROAD NW CALLING PUBLIC HEARING SEWER , NW FROM HILLS OF BUNKER AREA. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 073-94, adopted the 3rd day of May , 19 94 , a Feasibility Report has been prepared by TKDA for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the 17th day of May , 19 94 ; and WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be feasible for an estimated cost of $ 83,000.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for Project No. 94-3 , for the improvements. 2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to ) Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 83,000.00 3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 7th day of June , 19 94 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8:15 PM and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of May 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. McKelvey - Mayor ATTEST: ) Victoria Volk - City Clerk 9~-3 TKDA TOLTZ. KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED " 1500 PIPER JAFFRA Y PlAZA ..... CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101.2140 PHONE:612J202-4400 FAX:6121292-0083 ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS Man;h 22, 1994 Mr. Todd Haas City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, Minnesota 55304 Re: 140th Lane NW Street and Storm Sewer Improvements City of Andover, Minnesota Commission No. 9140-940 lr'>. n:- ,-.:.... _. J...~C'"\"""{!""'I',!';';":"")" . ..._~~ P; '\.I.,.... .r ~ ~.~. ;.' ''':.~... .:'':uf,-.J MAR 2 3 1994 CITY ,-,,~ . '-'c '--"!\11". .~ h-r- - ~- l.' ':"":1'- Dear Mr. Haas: As directed, enclosed please fmd a cost estimate for street and storm sewer improvements on 140th Lane NW from the easterly line of the Hills of Bunker Lake - 5th Addition to Prairie Road. The costs quoted herein are estimates only and are not guaranteed prices. Final contracts will be awarded on a unit price basis. The cost for these improvements would possible be less if constructed with the Hills of Bunker Lake - 5th Addition improvements. I The summary of estimated costs are as follows: Streets and Restoration Storm Sewer Total Estimated Construction Costs $46,650.00 17,200,00 $63,850.00 Engineering, Legal, Fiscal and Administration Total Estimated Project Cost 19.150.00 $83,000.00 If the project cost was split by the seven (7) abutting parcels. the assessment would be $83,000.00n = $ 11,857. 14jLot. If the project cost was split by the six (6) abutting parcels, (excluding the comer lot with access from Prairie Road) the assessment would be $83,000.00/6 = $13,833jLot. As discussed previously, sanitary sewer and watermain would be constructed with the street improvements but would not be a'lsessed until the homeowners cOlmected to the system, The current assessment rates for sanitary sewer and watennain are as follows: "- ) Sanitary Sewer Lateral Charges W atenllain Lateral Charges Trunk Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge Trunk Watennain Connection Charge Trunk Sanitary Sewer Area Charge Trunk Watelmain Area Charge $22.00jLF $22.00jLF $275.00IUnit $1,145,OO/Unit $995,001 Acre $1,058,OO/Acre Mr. Todd Haas March 22, 1994 Page 2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE " 140th Lane NW Street and Storm Sewer Improvements City of Andover, Minnesota Conunission No. 9140 STREETS AND RESTORATION . I Item . No, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. , ) Description Cormnon Borrow Common Excavation Subgrade Preparation Surmountable Curb and Gutter B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter Class 5 Aggregate Base Bituminous Wear Course Topsoil Borrow Sodding Seeding Silt Fence Subtotal Contingencies Estimated Construction Cost Ouantitv 300,0 CY 2,000.0 CY. 9.5 RS 1,830.0 LF 40.0 LF 816.0 TN 468,0 TN 445.0 CY 1,560,0 SY 0.32 AC 50,0 LF Unit Price $4.00 3,00 100.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 24.00 8.00 2.50 1,000.00 3.00 Amount $1,200.00 6,000,00 950.00 9,150.00 240.00 5,712.00 11 ,232,00 3,560.00 3,900.00 320,00 150.00 $42,414.00 4.236.00 $46,650.00 Mr. Todd Haas March 22, 1994 Page 3 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE " 140th Lane NW Street and Storm Sewer Improvements City of Andover, Minnesota COnu1lission No. 9140 STORM SEWER Item No, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Description 12" RCP Class 5 Storm Sewer 15" RCP Class 5 Storm Sewer 18" RCP Class 3 StOIDl Sewer 18" Flared End Section 4' Diameter Catch Basin Manhole Cable Concrete ) Subtotal Contingencies Estimated Construction Cost Sincerely, ~44/k- Thomas A. Syfko, P.E, T AS(mha / Ouantitv 32.0 LF 400.0 LF 60.0 LF 2.0EA 4.0EA 128.0 SF Unit Price $17,00 18,00 20.00 700.00 1,100.00 7,00 Amount $544.00 7,200.00 1,200,00 1,400.00 4,400.00 896,00 $15,640.00 1.560.00 $17,200.00 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA t\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda Todd J. Haas, Engineering~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 1\0, Accept Petition/94-9/FOx Woods v O?~ The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility report for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer, Project 94-9, in the Fox Woods Addition, except those lots fronting on Bluebird street NW. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA \ RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND STORM SEWER , PROJECT NO. 94-9 , IN THE FOX WOODS ADDITION, EXCEPT THOSE LOTS FRONTING ON BLUEBIRD STREET NW AREA. WHEREAS, the city Council has received a petition, dated May 4, 1994 , requesting the construction of improvements; and WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. 2. " / 3 . The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous. Escrow amount for feasibility report is $1,000.00 The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA and is instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of May 19 94 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor " j Victor~a Volk - city Clerk <flf- '7 . Gorham Builders, Inc. @ M\ EQUlHOISI\G Ql>PQl(Tl':ln I~ U I~K' \'''... ,"!_," ID # 0001117 3538 MISSISSIPPI DRIVE, COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 . PHONE (612) 421-0998 ) ~ '.....-..:: RECE!VED , . ~ '--. - .: 3.;- : :: e ;- ~ MAY 4 1994 -. ,.:. """:--,-., .::- .- , .......... . -, ~ .;:. ~"=, ::r=33:'=~-j:'~ ~: '.:,j. " .' ~ CITY Or ANUOVER :=:= ,-.,-. .. ~?CPCS=:' ;:=..":< .\I(_".:~~ i~=;:-I:I'=':'~ t.r.Y'" .: ~ r ~ j e;,.:;: ; :;.: ~h.?:.;-:; Bu i ~ ::2: :.~ 3. ,..... -;::.:::- ~'"' '2 ;.2:', ::e7:::';-::'~ -_.- :,7:::;':/-==:::3;"-:3 ~ia~2r m~1~, S~:'1~ary se~6~ .3 :,;:. r:T: S S'd2;-, ant s~rge~s Wlt~ ,....,...,.....--.-,....- .-. . . -,- -,,-,.- -....- curb and gut~3r~ witn the ccs~s of the imp~cve~2nts ~a :e ~ssess~~ against the bensfitins ~rcpertY7 y;Mic~ is tescrioe~ ~ox ~oc=s Addi~~G~, 3 ~ ~ebi ;-c:,::- ;~\^l ~:<c-::pt :'::056 f :':-:!""C ~ :;.~ 3'7<io cet;t~::r: ~ s unan,mC!J3 a.t:C -:.l:e puo: ~ c hea.;~ ns ~-:t.'.! ",-./ ::2 .'ia:vs::: . ............-. ........-- ,- -'- , --....,.... -- -- .... t.;---;~t f '~.2.S i ~ ~ -~ j ~:: l"""'2SC:';-: C9 o:-e;::are:: 2.S =oss~ble. ~~e have enc1csad a =~ec~~ for $1,000 for r-epc:--: s>:~ense. '. ~;lS 3<4,0::'0 1,1," ::e crej~ tee -:he fe.3.s i j ~ ! l -:. ~/ :"~'lJ a. r c:: 1 !::J.' ; .-..... -;rnc;r:'.-'SiT::er;-:. -2s::r:;'.'I.) :;:.; ~c.er9 y ~ ~hV~ '3,::.;-.; ,.. '2~,"",;3..;7: ) Our reputation is your best guarantee CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA SECTION NO Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J. Haas, Engineering~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM NO Accept Petition/Andover Center/ 94-11 ~~ .:2s. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility report for the improvement of sanitary sewer and watermain, Project 94-11, in the area of Andover Center. I \ MOTION BY: / SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA , J RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PROJECT NO. 94-11 , IN THE ANDOVER CENTER PREPARATION , AREA. WHEREAS, the City May 2, 1994 improvements; and Council has received a petition, dated , requesting the construction of WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: l. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous. 2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is $1,000.00 3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of May 19 94 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ! 91/ - II J(.......d."U"f~ rCI"+~r :2j'': A~'-tit:'I'" April 29, 1994 ~l5;CE.f'Ve;r) MAY 2 1994 ," CITy o/-- ' 1-\/\1' ..- ";./, ) \IF --R McDonald's Corporation 1650 West 82nd Street Suite 900 Bloomington, MN 55431-9888 612/884-4355 Fax: 612/885-4755 McDonald.S / @ City Engineer City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd., NW Andover, MN 55304 RE: Proposed McDonald's Restaurant N.E. Comer Round Lake Blvd. & Bunker Lake Blvd, Sir: McDonald's Corporation does hereby petition for improvements of the construction of a sanitary sewer service with the costs of the improvements to be assessed against the benefiting property and spread equally over a ten year period. .I Said petition is unanimous and the public hearing may be waived. We request that a feasibility report be prepared as soon as possible. We have enclosed a check for $1,000,00 for the feasibility report expenses. It is our understanding that this money will be credited against the project cost. Sincerel~ _' /1 .' ~l .J?J.~ // :: v G~ry '1e"-- a IV yel Project Manager Minneapolis Region Enclosure jb/2703.doc CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA 1\0, SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Todd J. Haas, ~ Engineering ~ ITEM t\O. Approve Change Order #1/ 93-10/SuperAmerica ~ ~(,. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving Change Order #1 for Project 93-10 in the area of SuperAmerica. staff recommends approval of the change order. The change order is a project cost the developer will be responsible for. ; MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ) TO: I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER #1 TO PROJECT NO. THE AREA OF SUPERAMERICA 93-10 IN WHEREAS, the City of Andover has a contract for Project No. 93-10, SuperAmerica with Ro-So Contracting of Centerville, Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the change order #1 for Project No. 93-10. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of May , 19 94 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. MCKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ... CHANGE ORDER " I TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED EngineerS-Architects-P1anners Saint Paul, MN May 2. 19-11 Corom. No. 10406 Change Order No. ~ To Ro-So Contracting. Inc for Suoeramerica Utilities. City Project 93-10 for Citv of Andover. Minnesota You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated Februarv 15 , 19 21-. The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will (increase) (G1e(.~e~~c) (nQt O'H"l"l9"') the contract Sum by Six Thousand Eight Hundred Seventv-seven and - - no/IOO Dollars ($ 6.877 00 ). This change order provides for the following: Add the fol1owina auantities to the contract: Item No De~criDtion Ouant i tv Unit Pricp- Sanitary Sewer 5 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 0-12' 9 Const Std. 4' Dia. Manhole 0-10' 10 Extra Depth of 4' Dia. Manhole 11 6" on 8" SDR 35 Wye Branch 12 6" PVC SDR 35 Service Pipe 13 6" PVC SDR 35 Vertical Service C/O Dewatering 175.0 LF 1.0 EA 2.6 LF 3.0 EA 45.0 LF 3.0 EA 175.0 LF $ 15.40 $1,100.00 $ 70.00 $ 40.00 $ 6.00 $ 70.00 $ 14.00 Subtotal - Add Deduct the fo11owina auantitv from the contract. Item No, Descriotion Ouantity Unit Price Sanitary SewP:r 14 8" PVC SDR 35 Vertical Service C/O 1. 0 EA $ 150.00 Subtotal - Deduct NET CHANGE ORDER " Amonnt +$2,695.00 +$1,100.00 +$ 182.00 +$ 120.00 +$ 270.00 +$ 210.00 +$2.450.00 +$7,027.00 Amount -$ 150.00 -$ 150.00 +$6,877.00 ~- / I Amount of Original Contract $ Additions approved to date (Nos. $ Deductions approved to date (Nos. $ Contract amount to date $ Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) (Not Changed) $ Revised Contract Amount $ 32.677 20 0.00 0.00 32.677 20 +6.877.00 39.554 20 , Date Approved CITY OF ANDOVER. MN Owner By Approved RO-SO CONTRACTING Contractor White - Owner* Pink - Contractor* Blue - TKDA By Date " \ I CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Mav 17, 1994 AGENDA !\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda Todd J. Haas, /~ Engineering~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 1\0. Accept Petition/94-12/Forest Meadows v ~7. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility report for the improvement of streets, Project 94-12, in the area of Forest Meadows. Total number of possible assessable lots - 24 Number in favor - 13 Number against - 9 , Number unavailable - 2 I Note: The City is responsible for 1 unit for the park. - I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: I J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF STREETS , PROJECT NO. 94-12 IN THE FOREST MEADOWS AREA. WHEREAS, the City May 2 improvements; and Council has received a petition, dated , 19~, requesting the construction of WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The petition is hereby declared as adequate. 2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to BRA and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of May 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk I / .:":-,........~ , -", ((]).\ \.1'\. ;-' "'. ./ ~: ,,::,..,,.....;.,,~:-- CITY of ANDOVER .' Date: 5 -7- Or 9- No. 9;(-12- Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described area: r~,e6.::.r ~~Pov</S -AND ArXrAt:::.S'Nr A.RE*..s do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by Construction of City ':strp,--t-.s and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. . J SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION YES NO ")Z X / 11dO ~'7l)2 Ii --1U( ]f /7 /(3/;/// t / li)../ 7-<:'!II',j{'iCt:': y----ef-,J }i.-.;...k/.....--.- 0\/ etG- /1tl/() ~{Lc?(l[ d'L<'ll~)tl) ., '/ This petition was circulated Address: 0 /8t/(() U'l/'f_ ~ ~tM ' 4 ~ by:"'r-'U . U((./ , , JJ.J:',1 /( f/zk13'fni q ? f( -7Ki7 I / {. rj.~." CITY of ANDOVER \..,L"\. ./ . ,.;.' -...._,~~..,.. " " --- 'I C'/ I Date: - -/_- C1: No. G)I-I-r2- Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described area: FOi2.E$ T ??;?.&'AJ/ClW.s AND A-DJ'ACENI ,4REAS do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by Construction of City ~-rreeTS and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION YES NO '/ , IJ ~/- j' 7'/t;h /Jlrj;;' }." A /_ ./.'--'.. / ,/:/1/..#. ,<,y I I .'}\ L.! - I 7 cr l' J,- A "r=.. tV I/\J . ! /(l ./ 79D-/lVE. /.J. ;j . ,,,. / ; If:})l :~ .' ?- '), x " , 1\ ;< <1 Y 1 3 This petition Address: 0 was circulated by, '):?-<4' )fii.1-t- f( 7f-lZ- J:.: -' i ~ ~ t ~ ~ 0 ~ " r;; :;; ~ '" :;; ~ :;; ;; ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ w 2: " 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ z "' ~ ~ w ~ ~ z " :;; ~ w ~ w ;; ~ 0 ~ ii: w ~ ~ ~ z 0 ~ 0: 0 ~ a: .:, ~ ~ >- ~ " " " w w w ;; ::: ~ " ~ I-' '" ~ :; :;; 0< 0 0< ~ '" z '< a: ~ '" ~ , ~ f '" " 0< '" 0< :j u 0: 0 ~ " ~ .. a: 0< " '" S 2: '" >- 0< 0 0 ~ ~ ~ '" '" 0 a: ~ ~ "' '" ~ u ~ ,: ,:;; 0 2: w I- 0< " 0 w ~ '" .. N W ~ .. " 0< '< U >- >- " :- 2: l! 0 z " '" 0< :> ;: w '3 ~ '" '< ~ a: 0 :E :i '" 0 g --co '.0 .:::,;:.---- I~ I II ~I - - --- ~ 0 -'8,.." _.....__ /J' ~ I , -, 180"'" laoy, 130"''' 11305" ~ J '8O"fl 1'8""'0 ~ ISO"" I I '80"'0 ~ 180.,.' 180t, . PARK 160S{ I I 1130'(00 I!O/7 ISo', , " u /90J" I . < % 'Bo:Jl "- fBcol '8_ 0( /Bool ) I {'9'1T , 119.." 17''''' 11~.,,, , I < I ~ "'11 I7no 17'ZI ----1--------- I - ~ , ~ 178"'5 I ~ "." I I I I I I 178CZ I /7au. 177'+' /78'f6 I I r I I I 177"5 I /71....., I Gl 17,"1S I I I I '7"5 I I .1 117'''' I '77_ ........... ""_ 1771'S I 0 H I ~ ':;,,<" I ~ 0 I ~ , ~ I >- ~ I ,>- - . I ,'" 1: ~ . J I I I I I I )/15"82 , I 17"~. II I, 'I J7"fO'-f Ward Lake J , ! I I!I I I I I. I I /1 I I I I I I II! '" "" , I Ii I I II /71'30 m~ I if! I I I I I i/~ J7011 I I C ( ~ 1tA71 , I , CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA 1\0, SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 1\0. Accept Feasibility Study/94-12/ Forest Meadows Todd J. Haas, _~ Engineering ~ ~ .;2~. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting feasibility study and calling public hearing for the improvement of streets, Project 94-12, in the Forest Meadows area. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA \ ) RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS PROJECT NO. 94-12 IN THE FOREST MEADOWS AREA. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , adopted the 17th day of May , 19~, a Feasibility Report has been prepared by BRA for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the 17th day of May , 19 94 ; and WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be feasible for an estimated cost of $ 148,085.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for Project No. 94-12, for the improvements. , ) 2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 148,085.00 3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 7th day of June , 19 94 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8:01 PM and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of May 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor I , Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA t\O, SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM t\O, Designate "No Parking" Resolution/Northwoods West Park Todd J. Haas, Engineering ~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda ;;9. ~ The City Council is requested to approve the resolution designating no parking on both sides of Crocus Street NW from 140th Lane NW to 141st Avenue NW and 141st Avenue NW from Crocus Street NW to Eidelweiss Street NW. Vehicles are parking on both sides at the corner of 141st Avenue NW and Crocus Street NW making it very difficult for vehicles to maneuver. Vehicles are parking here to get to the park for activities during evening hours. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: , CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA , / RES. NO. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING NO PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF CROCUS STREET NW FROM 140TH LANE NW TO 14lST AVENUE NW AND 141ST AVENUE NW FROM CROCUS STREET NW TO EIDELWEISS STREET NW. WHEREAS, the City Council is cognizant of the public nuisance, traffic hazard, congestion; and WHEREAS, the Council believes restricting the parking in the area will be a solution to the problem. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that those portions of Crocus Street NW and 141st Avenue NW be designated no parking. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of May , 19 94. 17th CITY OF ANDOVER , ) J. E. MCKelvey - Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Volk - City Clerk <~, . '~7;~r : ~\,/M 1',\ 9 ~~ I J::~"r'Wi:~--:~:'~ .~ ~~jl ,;, I.' I ;:~ ' I, ~ '---, J~ KADLEC ~ I :/7'2' ',. ~ '5J.Tf5 . "". L-~ . ~_'.__~,; 'I, . 'll: B'I . ~.~--!- - 'I 'S~ ' k'Sf~ ' ,~ '\~ /l- ~ /~'-'.. ~ ,'//,1; " ~""I ~~7/ ,~ I ;.~::. ~" I, : n~ ' 2D'S AD?'; ~- ~->" r rrkt:-(d$-2~-. ~~ : l ,'" ~ \ d; CR<FKRIDGF\, '\ ~\ l /', ~ J J I/~' 1'/ ~:.r , Fs~;rFs; ''''''''h' ," , ""'- I T i I I I I I " IA :,;:-:;;-,~ O"~~o: ~~II . I - T _,,",~D11 ~oo I ,T I I I ~V ~ >=0 ~~~~ I ~ I' ('I'j 1 1/' I s_." r~ G I 0'(, ""IT; I""" ~ ~o IE. .1" ":~ "~,, ,,~ I /' ~ ;', ""eRE, :..,;.. . I _" . . lOITUIT I ./) ~.n,.j.. ~t>F1 "'t.. 151 \~, 'I~DDmON i~'( ,1'1' ,'.1.- . mBI - -' "", -;-:;:; 1,/,1'/..< ~~^P\ 'i:J' ;1;,1[/::-. .tt.:' ,''''.,' ~ f.~ ~'~". (:Y.~ - , , . .\/'d ~ -./ ; GO" I ~ ~~+T; NbRT':;wboos ' .1-1+ ' ~ ~ . ',; ;" ':: ,>~.;; ~m~. :'~~~NOlk~ .,,' "0' \!1~'~".'.II" ::,::,: ticl1Y"p"i:. ..... ..,'" . :g,')9' , ,.: ....,., . GO" Jlc;ii..; '. , ' . e.r;.1. ~'/An f.:-jO', , ,':,.,. '(.1:' .7(.:.T-r.f. ' {,m""",",,.", I-;~' fTr}qlr~D!l.i', 'AC'"'' rvvr 7/.f'-' ,. ': ". '.>61=-" .... : '''...,''2ND ", I--!.Z;;iv.:::;:.. : 1-f-P'~:\.2),',~ ~ 'If'' . " ,~. ',,, ' ?;JfflGZJ..... li.IIADO~'I;"\',. ~'... "."P. ~~r""~"'-1- 'Pt.. ~. ....?+~- ~". .r.~.f." :y.;. : .,.!.,.,.!. " ,.,..., "'.'.'7".. "Q,,~ ,,,.~,,0).'0,p,;-'~: ' ." r-: ;a: . '~r;--;:;: _______ . ~:" ":. : . I ",' ,.."";F.'r..,~, ~.:, , 1Q .' I --' w=r c '" ... . v ..;:"n n ; I-; ~ K-,r;;;.,i'lf."""",~"~",,, ~"." ~L::.:'>:.~ d -'--- /.....f.;. , Tt.tA'Ll'~li~ Si;-",. '.t, R" '''''.tl",N~..,,, ~ ~-~ i;, .. ~. -1\\ REv:i;:; ,'* :. . ':1:":" , L:. I ~ "'"'' "* ;:;:.; 0 ,', . OAK' " .1r-r.;r.r."'"I-8''' I . ~,. ": ;'c" >.:, __ ~ ?J. {". ~ D .~:" 'J ~<;'I'lr i MA5NO; iliwfr!,}.\--~ I I"'~ : ' , ,., ",., - r= - i~. >- ~ 7. ';) I I LB IS S'Aoi : 2EJlli..', "';{'if.~ : I . i: "''''r- 15 ~ 1\. I.-~{ n:n- I Hl \~ ~L "..;jO' ,~~".,.!.::t I' _ '1 h '''' .~ ~ln'IJft'....'H+" '*It,.' '~I;J!" 0 III H'~_..: .".. ;-:I~,~I=''' H i{.>;~y//I'ilf:4~V/c:*. :'::'; h-~/.~. L~;or.... I' .: ~....~."~~.~.::~. /~;!//'/-7'l,iRAt:Ef-~:-,~,~'v "1-.:-'''1'".'' N.'.~~.ll;~~., +- : ~ WAr'l~ . I " ',' ' ~ib; . BITI '~';"'" .".., .''X, L." " . I I " I~M ' ~~ I--.:: t-:j . .." ,,,.-- . .. GARDEN ACRES' ~ 'c,"~; $ -I n:r---:=:: ~ II~C;;J:f.l'r-"" RNO ~Ai)o.- P. 'K I j . .! ~ , " - , V;'-/ ^. ~. .. :n=>.', L_ _ _uo..' ..~ I ,;:'''..1 ,'" ~. - 1- " I ~~., '- ':"''1;>:;'';-P;'::~~;!:.)i'''7.3~rT:E\. I'm 'p;.~.'~ :-"l] .J&;Et . ,ell:,,_ .". ,. Ri S-\,-~ ..... '9' ~~ ~~~.P,'-;;:i.:.;;"...~'''';-Y.,;. ':mJic~~ ~, -Ii" . ,:. l= ~(~ .. ..:." '" : r K' '" ..~ C~L ., '", iI' "PH' '''''''J/L''H I-!~' " _ .::~~"I;'.-~. ..,~.~b~~. ~ '" (il~i~;r- .. .":~;.4,- :":.: : ; ~': ~t:. '~:=~::;i 'I,irg;;' 'M":'".: . !. ;D :: ,~". c . ~f ~ ,i "'" oi;i:::o'J ' . '" >-.J -f' .I " 1.1' -".,. f'!: to:;:;): 'J~"" ; : ,. ..' : '. : '" ~ . D-< Cjl<:1;f.r:'.'~" ,';", ,! /" n:;, 'rzin;;r<<{), l-. ""'ofo".If~' ;-:: ,',~.:':I'; "\~" ." '.':, ~~:. :: 'b'J~.~ '..J ........,,: ':;;r;r, <IN , - "" .' .... . . ! ..~. ,re;" 'I"ro-{], .' ~'.' .......' 'I '0 i ,_ ... u 7' .'D~.;,",. " --'< ''- ---r '-' IriJ.;,'. " \"/-"f;';;;;"I'!'I'\>"._ , . ',,,;t..;',..'l!',J< " "~r.~ ----1.~_~~. I I -------=- ~.. ...L.-.: -'--. _-li"'~~l~;---.u,r- CITY OF COON r<A.F':!DS. .!.~JJOK:~\ ::;::).~ , ,--, , ' ., lJRO. ) I 1'-l:ST~TES J -1- I . AM! 3 i ,'), I 'I 1 I I I L --'--- - -~- . , :p. . !CITY i FIRE DEPARTMENT t.,'.::, HA-LL j 1 III 1\ UND . l...c~ ,h ""tJII~i . '~ ) I +!5 I' , ES!.A1 ' '" I ) h,;" :Y I I I I -~ IT, , . I. Ii}"'.. '''.'''.:'--:' , I: &~ooP;-;'=-- I FR~""PrH~~..~ "0 : I [' ~u~, '.''''''':';fr~~j~~t ) = ~ T ,.. , . '4....,Qln~& I ; ~~GI >-EN .. .~}; 1 'f-------r ')1=1 ,7 ~I .. ..L .. ~ it ~~ :t I . eSTA,t~8 ,." ..;;:..=; 'f I ~~L' i~ ...,.,......':} ~.7;7;"".""'~1 I' J! , ~,i~W..~ KcNSlNf;rON i I I---Cl "I' ~ . ~ ~ ~ 'r'rl""'"'''''''' , . /., -" ~P.l I ' ,.:~'; ..~~~""'.-::'I Ii i~ .~!tJ I" U ~ ~. lu.r.v.'..... -0 ~~~ I I /, u \~~,S..;/'..'I.." STIlTS",,,,,, o.t:'- J21/~f'~ ~::r,,:. '. ..' .(tlI. / ~~ ~ .(-A I I I ! ----- ---W- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA t\O, SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Agenda ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t\O. Accept Feasibility Study/94-5/ SuperAmerica Addition Todd J. Haas, Engineerin~ OJ- ...3 0 . The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting feasibility study, waiving public hearing, ordering improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer, Project 94-5, in the SuperAmerica Addition area. Note: The feasibility report is in its final draft and will be available at the City Council meeting for review. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA J RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT 94-5 FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN AND STORM SEWER IN THE FOLLOWING AREA OF SUPERAMERICA ADDITION WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 5th day of April 19 94 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by presented to the Council on the 17th day of May TKDA and , 19 94 ; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Andover to hereby receive the feasibility total cost of improvements of $ Hearing and order improvements. City Council of the City of report with an estimated , waive the Public BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. BE IT FURTHER STILL RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby require the developer to escrow the sum of $ 5,000.00 with such payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and specifications. MOTION seconded by Councilmember the City Council at a regular 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmembers and adopted by meeting this 17th day of May voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: \ ! J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE May 17, 1994 AGENDA SECTION NQ Consent Agenda Non-Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM !\O. Receive April 1994 Financial statements Daryl E. suland~~./O / ~ ~ .l~ Finance Di'ecto'~ "zr- ...3 I. REQUEST The Andover City Council is requested to receive the April 1994 financial statements for the General, Water, Sewer and Central Equipment Funds. Please note: 1) General Fund revenue collections are $53,870 behind the pace set in 1993. Seventy five percent of the slow down is in the area of 'Non-Business Licenses and Permits. As of April 30th, only 127 new construction building permits were issued, compared to 187 for 1993's record pace. The interest earnings for the first quarter have not been distributed as of April 30th. The estimated earnings for the General Fund for the first quarter are $8,600.00, compared to 1993 first quarter earnings of $9,194.00. 2) The 1994 General Fund expenditures compare favorably to April 1993. To date, 28% of the General Fund budget has been expended. Through the first four months of 1993, 27% of the budget had been expended. Departmentally, there are only minor variations. 3) Four expenditures have been authorized using the contingency account for funding as follows: 1994 Adopted Budget: Appropriations: Additional N.M.M.A. Public Works phone Upgrade City Hall/pw Garage Roof Study Superfund Cleanup/Chamber of Commerce Remaining Balance: $25,000 1,000 4,000 800 500 $18r700 MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: 4) The Water Fund and Sewer Fund revenues and expenditures are slightly higher than last year through April 30. This is to be expected with the growing customer base receiving service. As with last year's personal services accounts, the Water Fund is using a larger portion of hours worked than budgeted. The offset is the Sewer Fund is not receiving the 'hours workedr as planned. This area should be studied closely during the 1995 budget process. The M.W.C.C. monthly installment of $30,240 for sewage disposal is due by the 5th of each month. 5) The inter-departmental charges for equipment "rental" used to fund the Central Equipment Fund operations is recorded quarterly. The first quarter entry was recorded in March. Expenditures for the first four months are in line with budgeted operations. Should there be any questions regarding the information presented, please contact me prior to the meeting so I may have adequate time to research the question. ) \ ) ., ) CITY OF ANDOVER YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES GENERAL, WATER, SEWER AND CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUNDS As of 30Apr94 Revised Year to Date Percentage Budget Actual Remaining --------------- -------------- ---------- G ENE R A L FUN D REV E N U E S ----------------------- ----------------------- GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 1,491,885.00 BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS 14,000.00 NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS Building Related Other 265,855.00 8,100.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 714,594.00 / CHARGES FOR SERVICES Street Lighting Other 91,400.00 38,900.00 37,000.00 COURT FINES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE Interest Earned Refunds and Reimbursements Other 33,000.00 31,000.00 4,600.00 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS From Admin. Trust Fund From TIF 1-1 Fund From TIF 1-2 Fund 65,000.00 24,000.00 6,000.00 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 2,828,334.00 ------------ ------------ 1,621.95 99 5,144.00 63 107,048.15 59 2,040.00 74 74,675.50 89 25,058.51 72 15,775.23 59 8,025.22 78 100 100 2,843.02 90 1,752.29 61 100 100 100 ------------ 244,433.87 91 ------------ ------------ \ / CITY OF ANDOVER YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES GENERAL, WATER, SEWER AND CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUNDS As of 30Apr94 G ENE R A L FUN D E X PEN D I T U RES ----------------------- ----------------------- MAYOR AND COUNCIL NEWSLETTER ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATION FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION AUDITING ASSESSING ATTORNEY PLANNING AND ZONING DATA PROCESSING CITY HALL BUILDING FIRE STATION BUILDING PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING SENIOR CITIZEN'S CENTER EQUIPMENT BUILDING CITY HALL GARAGE ENGINEERING TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT POLICE PROTECTION FIRE PROTECTION PROTECTIVE INSPECTION CIVIL DEFENSE ANIMAL CONTROL TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY Revised Year to Date Percentage Budget Actual Remaining 47,320.00 5,555.00 11,210.00 144,225.00 124,575.00 11,000.00 53,860.00 51,660.00 82,720.00 24,400.00 46,040.00 32,520.00 21,835.00 9,270.00 3,240.00 560.00 82,880,00 752,870.00 433,934.00 309,188.00 177r570.00 3,425.00 9,950.00 934,067.00 21,636.10 1,378.57 56,872.78 39,184.40 2,436.00 53,853.00 12,781. 68 19,018.64 12,934.96 15,801. 62 13,275.20 13,497.29 3,032.26 1,094.68 465.35 22,945.49 290,208.02 107,275.32 80,818.50 62,010.52 992.17 2,551.30 253,647.81 54 75 100 60 68 77 o 75 77 46 65 59 38 67 66 16 72 61 75 73 65 71 74 72 \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES GENERAL, WATER, SEWER AND CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUNDS As of 30Apr94 Revised Year to Date Percentage Budget Actual Remaining G ENE R A L FUN D E X PEN D I T U RES ----------------------- ----------------------- STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL STORM SEWERS STREET LIGHTING STREET SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTS-BILLED TREE PRESERVATION/MAINT , WEED CONTROL ) RECYCLING TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS PARKS AND RECREATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UNALLOCATED OTHER FINANCING USES 318,690.00 180,815.00 25,670.00 19,650.00 43,160.00 13,680.00 73,775.00 24,380.00 8,630.00 40,115.00 748,565,00 283,772.00 22,160.00 53,900.00 33,000.00 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 2,828,334.00 ------------ ------------ 42,863.83 45,108.68 2,014.05 4,188,79 6,954.55 2,353.26 19r463.05 6,412.06 374,16 8,523.81 138,256.24 59,810.51 6,619.79 35,533.00 6,272.20 790,347.57 ------------ ------------ 86 75 92 78 83 82 73 73 95 78 81 78 70 34 80 72 J CITY OF ANDOVER YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES GENERAL, WATER, SEWER AND CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUNDS As of 30Apr94 W ATE R FUN D REV E N U E S ------------------- ------------------- WATER SALES METER SALES PERMIT FEES MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES TOTAL WATER FUND REVENUE W ATE R FUN D E X PEN S E S ------------------- ------------------- SOURCE, STORAGE AND TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION ADMINISTRATION TOTAL WATER FUND EXPENSES Revised Year to Date Percentage Budget Actual Remaining 332,000.00 42,000.00 18,000.00 14,000.00 406,000.00 ------------ ------------ 119,150.00 169,625.00 117,225.00 406,000.00 ------------ ------------ 64,633.03 14,967.00 5,800.00 456.65 85,856.68 ------------ ------------ 11,161.61 63r773.41 28,602.00 103,537.02 ------------ ------------ 80 64 67 96 78 90 62 75 74 CITY OF ANDOVER YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES GENERAL, WATER, SEWER AND CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUNDS As of 30Apr94 SEW E R FUN D REV E N U E S ------------------- ------------------- SEWER CHARGES INTEREST REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS TRANSFER FROM SEWER CONN. FUND TOTAL SEWER FUND REVENUE SEW E R FUN D E X PEN S E S -------------------- -------------------- COLLECTION Metropolitan Waste Control Other Expenses ADMINISTRATION TOTAL SEWER FUND EXPENSES Revised Budget Year to Date Percentage Actual Remaining 563,300.00 6,000,00 30r500.00 599,800.00 ------------ ------------ 362,880.00 140,770.00 96,150.00 599,800.00 ------------ ------------ 136,770.15 136,770.15 ------------ ------------ 151,200.00 15,056.82 17,375.85 183,632.67 ------------ ------------ 75 100 100 77 58 89 81 69 CITY OF ANDOVER YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES GENERAL, WATER, SEWER AND CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUNDS As of 30Apr94 Revised Year to Date Percentage Budget Actual Remaining CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUND REVENUE ---------------------- ---------------------- CHARGES FOR SERVICE EQUIPMENT RENTALS 166,770.00 41,692.50 75 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE 166,770.00 41,692.50 75 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE INTEREST EARNED SALE OF USED EQUIPMENT REIMBURSEMENTS USE OF WORKING CAPITAL 2,000.00 100 123.80 TOTAL MISC REVENUE 168,770.00 41,816.30 75 TOTAL REVENUE 168,770.00 41,816.30 75 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUND EXPENSES ---------------------- ---------------------- TOTAL FUND EXPENSES 41r560,OO 13,088.93 68 76,200.00 11,921.90 84 18,500.00 14,936.00 19 16,800.00 8,185.25 51 15,710.00 4,003.15 74 ------------ ------------ 168,770.00 52,532.73 68 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ PERSONAL SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES & MAINT INSURANCE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CONTINGENCY CAPITAL OUTLAY . I CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION May 17, 1994 DATE AGENDA SECTION t\O. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Die: .~~tnn Planning ~ ~'~ ITEM t\O. Approve Summary pawnbroker Ordinance David L. Carlberg City Planner J~. REQUEST ) The City Council is requested to review and approve the attached summary to Ordinance No. 104, An Ordinance Regulating Pawnbroker, Secondhand Goods Dealer and Precious Metal Dealer. The summary will be published in the Anoka Union in place of the ordinance to decrease the publishing costs. Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191 gives the City the authority to publish summaries if ordinances are lengthy as long as the summary clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA / ORDINANCE NO. 104 SUMMARY TITLE AN ORDINANCE REGULATING PAWNBROKERS, SECONDHAND GOODS DEALERS AND PRECIOUS METAL DEALERS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. PURPOSE The City Council of the City of Andover finds that pawnbrokers, secondhand goods dealers and precious metal dealers potentially provide an opportunity for the concealment of crimes because such businesses have the ability to receive and transfer stolen property easily and quickly. The City Council also finds that consumer protection regulation is warranted in transactions involving pawnbrokers, secondhand goods dealers and precious metal dealers. The purpose of this Ordinance is therefore to prevent pawnbroking, secondhand goods and precious metal businesses from being used as facilities for commission of crimes and to assure that such businesses comply with the basic consumer protection standards, thereby protecting the public health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the City. LICENSED REQUIRED , , , No person shall exercise, carry-on, or be engaged in the business of pawnbroker, secondhand goods dealer or precious metal dealer within the City unless such person is currently licensed under this Ordinance. A license under this Ordinance shall authorize the licensee to carryon business only at the permanent place of business designated in the license. No license may be transferred to a different location or different licensee. No more than three (3) licenses shall be issued by the City of Andover at any time and priority shall be given to qualified applicants for renewal of existing licenses. A separate license will be required for each business listed above. For instance, a pawnbroker may not conduct, operate or engage in the business of secondhand goods dealer without having obtained a secondhand goods dealer license in addition to a pawnbroker license. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUIRED In addition to filing a complete application as specified above, an application for a Special Use Permit shall also be filed ~Tith the City Clerk. The procedure and provisions of the Special Use Permit are in accordance with Sections 5.03 and 7.03 of Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Andover. \ / No person shall operate, exercise, carry-on or be engaged in the trade or business of a pawnbroker, secondhand goods dealer or precious metal dealer without first being granted a Special Use Permit from the City of Andover. , Page Two Ordinance No. 104 Summary RENEWAL APPLICATION. All licenses shall expire one year after the issuance unless earlier renewed. A renewal application fee shall be required as set by Council Resolution. A new application fee shall be required whenever there is any change in the facts presented by the applicant other than the date, applicant(s)' home address or building owner(s)' address, or in the case of any license not renewed prior to its expiration. HOURS OF OPERATION From 9:00 p.m. saturday to 7:00 a.m. Monday, no property shall be received as a pledge or purchased by any pawnbroker, secondhand goods dealer or precious metal dealer; nor shall any property be sold during said hours by any pawnbroker, secondhand goods dealer or precious metal dealer, nor on any other day before 7:00 a.m., nor on any day after 9:00 p.m. Further, no pawnbroker, secondhand goods dealer or precious metal dealer shall be open for business on any legal holiday. \ i DATE: May 17, 1994 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL Tree Commission Minutes - April 25, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 26, 1994 Special City Council Minutes - April 28, 1994 Personnel Committee Minutes - May 3, 1994 City Council Minutes - May 3, 1994 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - May 5, 1994 Letter from John Davidson, TKDA - May 4, 1994 March 1994 Anoka County County Sheriff Report Fire Department Information Ord. No. 8CCCC Ord. No. 104 Schmitt/Allen Sketch Plan Woodland Creek 4th Addition Final Plat Hills of Buner Lake 5th Addition Final Plat Forest Meadows Feasibility Report Schedule of Bills PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. THANK YOU. \\ ; (' \~\/ '\7 . Ql 511-q~ TKDA TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS May 4, 1994 " 1500 PIPERJAFFRAY PlAZA 444 CEOAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA5510H140 PHONE:6121292-4400 FAX:6121292-o083 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Andover, Minnesota REC,EllVED MAY 5 1994 CITY Or-: ANDOVER Re: Regular Council Meeting Andover, MliInesota Commission No. 9140-949 The following is a summary of engineering matters discussed and action taken at the Regular Council Meeting held on May 3,1994. 1. Consent Agenda: The Council by one motion approved Consent Agenda items as follows: A. 140th Lane. Proiect 94-3 - Comm. No, 10671: The Council received a petition for utility and street construction from Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition to Prairie Road and referred it to the staff for preparation of a feasibility report, B. Sharon's 2nd Addition. Project 94-7 - Comm, No. 10672: The Council received a petition for utilities and street constmction within Sharon's 2nd Addition and referred it to the staff for preparation of a feasibility report. C. Xeon Street Tmnk Storm Sewer. Project 93-9 - Comm. No. 10403: The Council approved the easements and authorized payment to Mr. and Mrs. Holasek in the amount of $16,100.00 subject to staff administrative approval upon submission of documents by the Holaseks'. 2. Project 93-31 - Woodland Creek 4th and 5th Additions. PreliminarY Plat. Comm, No. ~: The Council by resolution did approve the revised preliminary plat as presented, subject to conditions contained within the resolution. 3. Proiect 93-10 - SuperAmerica Site Development. Comm. No. 10406: The developer requested a carwash be included with the gasoline service station site as previously approved, Council Action: Zone (present zone) would not be allowed in neighborhood business district. They would consider a rezone to general business, The Council referred the request to the Planning Commission to consider an ordinance change to allow a single stall carwash as an auxiliary use to a gasoline service station use or rezoning, The owner requested a meeting with staff to consider a relocation of the carwash facility to shopping center district, A. .._~ . Honorable Mayor and City Council May 4, 1994 Page 2 , 4, Proiect 94-11 - Downtown Center (McDonalds) Variance. Comm, No, 10680: Building setback and required green space have been affected by Anoka County acquisition of right-of-way when both Bunker Lake Boulevard and Round Lake Boulevard were widened. " Council Action: Due to hardship imposed by highway widening the consensus of the Council was to refer to P & Z for variance considerations. 5. Wittington Ridge - Soil Consolidation: Mr, Stephan Gale of STS Consultants did make a presentation of their reports dated November 1, 1993 and April 13, 1994. The second report was received at TKDA by FAX at 9:30 A.M. Friday, April 29, 1994. Concern of the City Council related to examples of settlement specifically on County roads which have been constructed through unstable soil conditions. The City is particularly concerned about on-going maintenance of a road constructed through deep pockets of peat soils. Council Action: The Council approved the soil consolidation method including wick drains with conditions as follows: 1. Plans and specifications prepared by the developer's engineer must be reviewed and approved by TKDA and/or the City Engineer. 2. The roadway shall not be surfaced with bituminous for at least 2 years during the soil consolidation period. The City Engineer and TKDA shall observe and control monitoring during the construction period. 3. A 5-year warrantee by Letter of Credit shall be provided commencing with the completion of the bituminous surfacing. The Letter of Credit shall be in an amount sufficient to maintain and correct any settlement exceeding the expected one inch (I") during the warrantee period. 4. No building permits shall be issued for the 8 lots west of the proposed soil correction area during the surcharge period unless authorized in writing by TKDA and/or the City Engineer. The Engineer was excused at approxinlately 11:00 P.M. JLD/mha ~__,w..... '._"'~"'~'" _'''~M._. ;@. .:,~..;:~ . ... '. ...._w ,. ........... '. . QL b-\~-q4 Office of ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF KENNETH G. WILKINSON .~- -.,-~ lie CiS: - . IV!!;}) 325 Jackson Street - Anoka, Minnesota 55303 MA Y 612-./21-4760 Fax 612-./22-7503 CIty 2 7994 Of- ;J, 1VOOl/ I2R " CITY OF ANDOVER MONTHLY CONTRACT PRODUCTIVITY REPORT MONTH: March , 1994 This report reflects the productivity of the Andover contract cars, .3125, 3135, 3145 and 3155. It does not include activity by Sheriff I s Department cars within the City during non-contract hours, nor, activity by other Sheriff's Department cars within the City during contract hours. 27 Radio Calls 572 4 Complaints 348 2 Medicals lO 2 P. I. Accidents 5 8 P.D. Accidents 9 9 Domestics 19 1 House Checks 44 22 Business Checks 405 80 62 8,701 Arrests: Traffic DWI Arrests: Felony G.M. Misdemeanor Arrests: Warrant Papers Served: Warnings: Aids: Public Other Agencies TOTAL MILES PATROLlED: CAPTAIN LEN CHRIST ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT PATROL DIVISION -6- Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer ~~ ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF THE MONTHLY BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 30TH, 1994 The meeting (to make up for the 3/23 meeting cancelled due to bad weather) was called to order at 19:05 by Chief Dale Mashuga. The pledge of allegiance was said and roll call was taken. The minutes of the February 23rd, 1994 Monthly Business Meeting were voted on and accepted as written. FIRE MARSHAL - J. Noyes April 17th Fire Safety at Grace Lutheran Church. Escape house will be there. Need additional help. April 22nd & 23rd Hazardous Waste Disposal at Anoka County Fair Grounds. Need personnel to help. OFFICER'S REPORTS Total Calls - Approximately twenty-five (25) ahead of last year. K. Anderson - DNR trucks are back at Station II. . J. Richardson - Station I weeknight rescue - Split shifts. COMMITTEE REPORTS STAFF RESOURCE - T. Miller . Testing four (4) new recruits. TRAINING - P. Gengler (absent) . No report. PUBLIC ED - J. Noyes . Nothing to report. MAINTENANCE - M. Winczewski T7 throttle fixed. Several new gages ordered for trucks. T8 gasket fixed. SAFETY - D. Reitan . Nothing to report. HAZMAT - s. Berhow . Nothing to report. UNIFORMS/STATION MAINTENANCE/RADIO/SPECIAL PURCHASES - T. Johnson / T. May . Nothing to report. FUND RAISING - J. Koltes . Casino trip cancelled. ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF THE MONTHLY BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 30TH, 1994 Page 2 COMMITTEE REPORTS (continued) SMALL EOUIPMENT/SCBA - T. Johnson . Meeting date/time changed to 3rd Monday of every month. AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS ENGINE 6 REFURB - M. Neuschwander . Nothing to report. INVENTORY - D. Saffrin (absent) . No report ISO - B. Peach (absent) / D. Szyplinski (absent) . No report. STATION RESPONSE - T. Howe . Nothing to report. CHIEF'S REPORT - Dale Mashuga/Dave Reitan Reviewed response procedures. Motion made by J. Koltes (seconded by T. Howe) to change daytime -vs- nighttime response from 6 to 6 to 5 to 5. Motion was discussed and voted on 16 for 8 against. Motion carried. Will be effective April 1st, 1994. Effective April 1st, 1994 - Station III no longer covering Station I on nights. Station II Amkus back in service on E6. Trying to get Officers medical kits and oxygen for their use. Reminder to stay in crews with the trucks you came on. NSMA accepted new Accountability System. Cancelled call policy discussed. Time limit will be changed to one (1) minute with roll call being taken after five (5) minutes. House burn on Round Lake Blvd. & 166th on April 17th at 08:00. Reminder to announce how many are on board if a vehicle is responding with less than a full crew. OLD BUSINESS . Adopt-a-Highway to be scheduled. -_.--~._- ..---------- ---- ------.._--- ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF THE MONTHLY BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 30TH, 1994 Page 3 NEW BUSINESS . CPR instruction on April 23rd. A motion for adjournment was made and seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 20:00. Respectfully Submitted, ~ Cr4; Larry Capeling, Secretary , Safety First, Inc. Class Roster ('oul-se: Instructor: Date: Location: Name Address City and Zip II Phone # I Social Security # II 1 Ra-oI #l?t/' ~ f /-L u:- ",Ofl1dt I/J.J fl." c~53<T1 1-./ .3 L1 _~ 7'"7~ 2m n ' a_A Qfk II_IAJ,C;-I'}dJ<-l L./(. Dr A ""JIJO er $30</ ~tf-.s7'?~ 3.5feve Fre:1-1Cf /</0';.4 .A~..U\ St-IV~ J 1~? -/251:5 /1 ,JD(/~' tiTJeY I I~o ~t. I<,t/b, Sf A/UI \ 4.J1!,1L. /Jhi~)J.., '/1 J. ./~o... ,lr? - J ;"'j? ! 5 .l>>-A"" 8b,.a.s~ J~L. ~ven g..~ ~n.lo~r S53D~ 751~ /;;J..C(3 . 16 I . r 7. [ 8 I i 9. I I FI?~ C , fJ, I? i 10 C. LlJ 55 J/7/)/ , . - i [1 l. r..v IJ. 5 Do/'ve Fo't /?1'5 (je~5 12, OF IJ A./d ove~. 13. Do IV e 1.3 /" 14, I) N~~"u~t'1j6~& ~ /J? 15. v. J I Ii r:' .' . .L \J 00 \-;!" i !' 16. 17. iIo 18. 19. ~. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Safety First. Inc. 784-1002 r.Dt Safety First., Inc. Class Roster Course: Instructor: Location: Date: I Name Address I City and Zip I Phone # Social Security # I 1 Val f6.u 11(;)30 UjC)/tYlcl&// /)rIc/o,H1r 6S3a}/ 75Y ~;;)3 J() /': J! 2. C:i".':. f.u..~'..rA~ ~f0.2'7 f4.:l!'.t.,lld c, H.J r-l,..,do lJ e..- ss3tYI 'ls4-9~~ ..J. 13SIg ~~/JJ. ArdoJif 3.~1~u.. 5S~ ,5'-1 - .Jf:llRS' 4, huc.\1ill. It \ b,f (~;z,iq r,doflu)t'//.1A ,A _. L'lliA S'5"30'-J I~- 70 ttb 5 '~\I'" mc~ 13~ qo1J,~h-ll),-,of^Sh'(, /'\ ,L~,SS-30,/ 7S-tf-{q';}../1 (~Di oW" ,~ - 6, Lf()A~ rY)>l:'ilUJl 130'10 N,~ht,nM/t st- A-",ri ^"pv c:;s3olf 7'5</- I,') -' {I 7, v 8, 9. 10, 11. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. 17. 18. 19, 20, 21. 22, 23, . 24. I 25. Safety First, Inc. 784-1002 .' . ANDOVER FIRE FIGHTERS nute DRILL ATTENDANCE 1765 CROSSTOWN BLVD, NW ANDOVER, MN 55303 Sllh.iect( s) Instructor( 8) <6~' ~~~ ~u e rnErtz.JIU!3& IZ TeRR l{ \Je/J4Sco ~/()f2e t\IC e AlE L:soN 5aw#' l3/t;6ner ~T &/S11-er ?~' C~oY\l~ ATTEllDANCE SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Cla~s Title C.p ((. Instructor ~ In order to contmue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. o Male ~Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 0 36-45 a 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead Instmetor: L Quality ofInstruction A Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm i;(. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied a Just Okay a Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied 3. Punctuality d Very Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay a Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied 4. Use of Class Time a Very Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay a Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied o Not Applicable PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS How would you rate the Assisting Instmctors as a group: i I. Quality of Instruction ~V ery Satisfied a Satisfied 12. Knowledge & Enthusiasm ~ Very Satisfied a Satisfied ! 3. Punctuality a Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 1. Use of Class Time 6.-.Very Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay a Just Okay a Just Okay a Just Okay a Dissatisfied a Very 'dissatisfied o Dissatisfied, 0 Very dissatisfied a Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would YOli rate the following Instmctional Methods, in regard to learning the subject matter: I. Lecture ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Slides PI. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. VCR 14. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Scenarios A3- Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o N/A o N/A o N/A o N/A PART IV - CLASS FORMAT/CONTENT 1. Description of Class . 2. Class Room! Area 3. Number of Sessions 4. Length of Sessions 5. Course Content 6. The class met my needs A" Very Satisfied I' ~ Very Satisfied ~ Very Satisfied f4. Very Satisfied Iii. Very Satisfied f3. Very Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied a Just Okay . 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied What classes or topics would you like to see offi red in future sessions? :f you would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: :Jr call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation, _ _oN ....---.--- SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title G f2 Instructor;) f~ In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course particIpants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. ~ Male 0 Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 ~ 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead Insjructor.' I. Quality ofInstruction E:JVery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm -E(Yery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay i J. Punctuality to/ery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay . of. Use of Class Time d. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied Q Just Okay b Dissatisfied O' Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied OVery dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS Q Not Applicable ,How would you rate the Assisting Instmctors as a group: , ]. Quality of Instruction ~very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very'dissatisfied ; 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, . Q Very dissatisfied · J. Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied of. Use of Class Time 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would YOII rate the following Instmctional Methods. in regard to leaming the subject mailer: ]. Lecture Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Q N/A 2. Slides Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Q N/A 3. VCR Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 4. Scenarios Very Satisfied Q Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PART IV - CLASS FORMAT/CONTENT I. Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area 3. Number of Sessions 4. Length of Sessions S. Course Content 6. The class met my needs Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o No C/ 1:5 ;- J..c...J. L- ~ut--- '- I~f- General Comments & Suggestions "- '-~ c:::;.... ..,( I would recommend this class to a friend: 0 Yes .fjt.t, / f- " \,./ _ V CL.- What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? [fyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: or call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. ..." - .........~;...._..-.. SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Clas~ Title CP 11 Instructor 51 e l ) c- H a djt (0 yy-, In order to continuHr~viding "Quality Education" for course participants, we are ask{~ hel~ us by completing this evaluation sheet Your honest answers will assist us in meeting (his goal for future classes, We '.vclcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. rsf Male 0 Female Age: if Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR . How would vou rate the Lead Instme/or: ! . Quality of Instruction 0 Very Satisfied , Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied ., Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied -l. Use of Class Time ~ Very Satisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS /low would you rate the Assistinj5 Instmetors as a group: j. Quality ofInstruction ~Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied. :; Punctuality ~_ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied .t Use of Class Time rSI Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Not Applicable rsI Satisfied rsI Satisfied rs( Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very 'dissatisfied .0 Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II1- INSTRUCTION METHODS How would )'OU rate the following Ins/me/ional Melhod~, in regard to leaming the subject maller: I. Lecture . 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied ~Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Slides 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied IV Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ., VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied .1. Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o N/A o N/A o N/A o N/A PART IV-CLASS FORMAVCONTENT o Very Satisfied ~Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied IY Satisfied 0 Just Okay '0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied rY' ,.satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied 9'patisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied Ij;I7Satisfied a Just Okay a Dissatisfied .0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Description of Class ~. Class Room/Area : Number of Sessions L Length of Sessions S. Course Content :) The class met my needs ! would recommend this class to a friend: III Yes General Comments & Suggestions o No What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? abOVl<r Pt(le } 'f LA c 1<5 ffyou would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are nvolved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: lr call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. _J ...... ~.- .....:......-~-.. SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title ~ ? R - Instructor In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism, J Male 0 Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 d2l65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR flow ll'ouldyou rate the Lead ~nsYlle/or: I. Quality ofInstruction ~Very Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm ~ Very Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay . J. Punctuality if Very Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay i,t Use of Class Time Q/Very Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay a Dissatisfied a Dissatisfied a Dissatisfied a Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable . How ll'ouldyou rale the A!>:~isti1;g Instmclors as a group: I. Quality of Instruction te:J Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied a Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm p/Very Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, 0 Very dissatisfied 3. Punctuality ~Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied . 4. Use of Class Time @/Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS !lOll' would YOIl rate the followillg IlIs/metiolla/ Method~. ill regard to /eaming Ihe subject matter: . Lecture rJi Very Satisfied Q Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Slides ff Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied VCR 1~>Very Satisfied a Satisfied Q Just Okay a Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Scenarios a Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay a Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied o N/A o N/A o N/A o N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~TICONTENT , Description of Class 0 Very Satisfied {{ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied : Class Room/Area 0 Very Satisfied {j Satisfied Q Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ,. Number of Sessions 0 Very Satisfied a Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~. Length of Sessions 0 Very Satisfied Itl Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 5. Course Content a Very Satisfied ~ patisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 6. The class met my needs a Very Satisfied Itt Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 1 would recommend this class to a friend: 0' es a No General Comments & Suggestions ,Vhat classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? ~~ _ .~ k O---:~ ~ . !' you would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other grou~ i1volyed in, please provide us with your name and phone #: ir call our office at 784-1002. . l4..- Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. 3~~ -4-Sf,jL~__. .......--. Class Title C PI<. Instructor S-h::ve.. In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will. assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. ~Male .esr Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 a 26-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead InJJTuclor: I. Quality ofInstruction a Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay i 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm Q--Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay .3. Punctuality I2JVery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay : 4. Use of Class Time iA"Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable How would you rate the Assisting Insln/ctors as a group: I. Quality ofInstruction GrVery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very'dissatisfied :2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm ld'"Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, .0 Very dissatisfied ) Punctuality ca-very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ,I. Use of Class Time f3\rery Satisfied 0 Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III -INSTRUCTION METHODS How would you rate the following InSln/Clional Melhod~, in regard to learning the subject mailer: 1. Lecture erY'ery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 2. Slides .eryery Satisfied 0 Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A ) VCR a Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Q N/A 4. Scenarios ld'Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Q N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~VCONTENT I. Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area 3. Number of Sessions ~. Length of Sessions ). Course Content 6. The class met my needs l4'Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied ia"Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied rzJVery Satisfied 0 Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied ~Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied .fa5'ery Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied ~ Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied f would recommend this class to a friend: General Comments & Suggestions Laved :r lea..necl ... lo"t ..!i:iLYes 0 No i+ /nsirudo,.. . W<:\J in ~I J "!j(n+ a...d Pf/,.. "Y , What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? If you would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: or call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation, _J _ ~,. _ .... ....--..--. ................--.. SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title {!,.t:/ /C Instructor In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you (0 help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism, o Male ~male Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 1Er'J6-45~6-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR . Hnw \I'~uldyou rate ~he Lead InSjPlc!nr: , :. Quahty ofInstructlOn l3"yery SatIsfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay : Knowledge &.Enthusiasm l1Y"yery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay ; Punctuality I3"Yery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay .; Use of Class Time UY'Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied OVery dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable How would you rate the Assis/ing Instmelors as a group: L Quality ofIl1struction ~Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm cr"'yery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied. 0 Very dissatisfied 3. Punctuality l3"yery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied . 4. Use of Class Time l3"'Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would you rgJe the following IlIs/mctional Methods, in regard to leaming the subject matter: 1. Lecture 13" Very Satisfied 0 ~tisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Slides 0 Very Satisfied Cl"'Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied -1. Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o N/A o N/A o N/A o N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~T/CONTENT ; Description of Class 13'Very Satisfied 2. Class Room/Area c{ Very Satisfied ; Number of Sessions c1" Very Satisfied 4. Length of Sessions 8' Very Satisfied 5. Course Content 0 Very Satisfied ,6. The class met my needs 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied I would recommend this class to a friend: ~ 0 No Q - Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied if Satisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o just Okay 0 D~ssat!sfied IEJJust Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied General Comments & Suggestions ~ .~. , ;Whafc1asses or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? .{ -. '"- ~~[fyou-would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are "'involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: if~(:ciIl.our office at 784-1002. f:.~:*';~;' \;';-ri~: . Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. '< ~.:< ',' , ~-. ,~ -. . ~ ...., SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Cla~s Title c.P0L- Instructor ~ J 1J'dvv( In order to contmue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, w~ are asRing you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. . Male 0 Female Age: a Under 13 a 13-18 a 19-25 26-35 a 36-45 a 46-64 a 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR 'low Il'(~uld you rale ~he Lead fllsyuctor: . i. QualIty ofInstructlOn or Very SatIsfied ~. Knowledge & Enthusiasm urYery Satisfied ,. Punctuality IS( Jlety Satisfied .1. Use of Class Time ~Very Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable i low would you rate Ihe A:':~istillg"fnstmclors as a group: I. Quality ofrnstruction cr~Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Jus( Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~. Knowledge & Enthusiasm cryery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, 0 Very dissatisfied 3. Punctuality c:r'"Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Use of Class Time CY'Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied Cl Just Okay Cl Dissatisfied Cl Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would YOII ratylhe followillg IlIslmcliollal Melhods, ill regard 10 leamillg the subject matter: I. Lecture ar"'Very Satisfied Cl ~isfied 0 Just Okay Cl Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ? Slides 0 Very Satisfied IB""Satisfied 0 Just Okay Cl Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 SaJisRed 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied ClYSiltisfied 0 Just Okay Cl Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o N/A o N/A o .'JI A o N/A PART IV - CLASS FORMAT/CONTENT Description of Class ~ Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Vel)' dissatisfied Class Room/Area ery Satisfied ~fied Cl Just Okay . 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Number of Sessions ~ry Satisfied atisfied Cl Just Okay Cl Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied j Length of Sessions ~ Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Vel)' dissatisfied ). Course Content Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay o Dissatisfied OVery dissatisfied 'J. The class met my needs Very Satisfied 0 atisfied o Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o No ! would recommend this class to a friend: General Comments & Suggestions What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? !fyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are nvolved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: Jr call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. -.. .....~ ~ --~ ..... SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EV ALVA TION Class Title (!f f( Instructor .5f-tuc flaAS'mrr- In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants/' we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. o Male ~ Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 IZ1 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART r - LEAD INSTRUCTOR : How would vou rate the Lead Ins/me/or: ; ]. Quality of-Instruction I2:j Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied : 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm lEI Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~ 3. Punctuality I:El Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Use of Class Time ~. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied . !Oll' would you rate the A.!J:~is/ing Instmctors as a ~,;roup: Quality ofIl1struction ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied Knowledge & Enthusiasm Iij Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, .0 Very dissatisfied Punctuality ID Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied -, Use of Class Time ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would you rate the following Instmetional Me/hodl', in regard to learning ,he .17Ibjee/ maller: I. Lecture 5) Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 2. Slides ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 3. VCR ~\ ~ 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A .) Scenarios 01 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/ A PART IV-CLASS FOR1tAT/CONTENT I Description of Class ill Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied , Class Room/Area III Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied , Number of Sessions ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 1. Length of Sessions I:zl Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ). Course Content ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied -j The class met my needs Cil Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied . would recommend this class to a friend: ~ Yes 0 No :;eneral Comments & Suggestions What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? If you would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: Jf call OUf office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. ~.~ _..~ - - .. SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title r.Jf K Instructor 12- [n order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are as you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. oJ Male j2(J Female Age: 0 Under] 3 0 13-] 8 0 19-25 ~26-35 _ 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR ; How would vou rate the Lead Ins/me/or: I. Quality ot-Instruction e1l Very Satisfied U Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ; 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm )g Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied i 3. Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied ;Ifl Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied i.i. Use of Class Time t!!A Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable How would you rate the Assisting Instmcrors as a group: L Quality ofIl1struction 'pg Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied : 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, .0 Very dissatisfied 3. Punctuality ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Use of Class Time J;iJ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS / low would you rate the following Instmctional Method~, in regard to leaming the subject matter: , . Lecture .a Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A Slides -!'.9 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A ^; VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied P!l N/A i. Scenarios ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~DCONTENT 'g} Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied rg Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Ia' Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied l;g' Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied tal Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied : Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area 3. Number of Sessions 4. Length of Sessions 5. Course Content 6. The class met my needs I would reconunend this class to a friend: ~ Yes 0 No G"ornI Commonts ~ Suggestions T cloV1~ --':l-k~L Irc~ - . (1i~f(';-I-o oJ. U o. ~Wi~n<m.s r:I' Cue Dl~m~~~__ ~ CPa",,, - S~, 1L -- _r1_~ 7J11.R yY\ -t'-J \ l~ __ _ OJYVR cf/ Ij- _ .vhat classes ot topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? . r you would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are nvolved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: Jr call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. _J ~""T,Y. -. ...... .....-..--. SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Cla~s Title C' PC Instructor 5e JJf_ n~ In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome both ~ve feedback and constructive criticism. _ ~ .J Male q(Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 rr.Y26-35 0 36-45 0 46-6.:1 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How Il'ouldyou rate the Lead Ins!!J1c(or: i I. Quality of Instruction ifyery Satisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm IS"'Jery Satisfied 3. Punctuality llY~atisfied 4. Use of Class Time ~ery Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied a Just Okay a Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS !-fOil' would )'ou rate the Assisting Jpstmctors as a group: i Quality ofInstruction I::V'~ Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay a Dissatisfied a :. Knowledge & Enthusiasm ~ry Satisfied 0 Satisfied a Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, a '. Punctuality ij}"'~ Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 .L Use of Class Time CW\'ery Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 a Not Applicable Very'dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS ! low would you rajP- the following Instmc/ional Methods, in regard to learning the subject maUer: I. Lecture Iil"')lery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied 2. Slides O"Very Satisfied a Satisfied 0 Just Okay a Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. VCR a yPy Satisfied a Satisficd 0 Just Okay a Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Scenarios lIVVery Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay a Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o N/A O!'YA lfYN/ A o N/A 1 . Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area 3. Number of Sessions 4. Length of Sessions 5. Course Content i) The class met my needs PARTIV-CLASSFO~T/CONTENT uz("yery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ILryery Satisfied a Satisfied a Just Okay' a Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied fI:( y"ery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~yery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied IJl' % Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied qvVery Satisfied 0 atisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied . would recommend this class to a friend: Yes 0 No ) ,:",",1 Comm,nts & Sugg"tion, 1:.ow-e<,-I.O:b+~ CS:t'.J.}D ~ ~ QC What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? lfyou would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are ;nvolved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: or call our office at 784-1002, Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. -~ - ........_-~... SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title C~ Instructor S~~\J-.L In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. ~ :) Male 0 Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 J8l 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How lI'ou/dyou rate the Lead Instmetor: : J. Quality ofInstruction 0 Very Satisfied a- Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied : 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied ei. Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3 Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied f.9 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied .1. Use ofCLiss Time 0 Very Satisfied .e9 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS !low wOI/:d'Ol/ rate the A~:~isting Instmetors as a group: o Not Applicable , 1. Quality OJ Instruction o Very Satisfied :Ja Satisfied o Just Okay o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied i 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm OVery Satisfied ~ Satisfied o Just Okay o Dissatisfied. 0 V er~y dissatisfied 3 Punctualit I' o Very Satisfied a Satisfied o Just Okay o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ,-1. Use of Class Time o Very Satisfied U- Satisfied o Just Okay o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS I!OW WOI/I:I Ylm rate the following Instmetional Method~. in regard to leaming the subject matter: I Lectun. 0 Very Satisfied 8- Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/ A .. Slides 0 Very Satisfied O'Satisfied .9 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisficd 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~ N/ A 1. Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied ta' Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~T/CONTENT ! Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area 3. Number of Sessions 4. Lcngth of Sessions .5. Course Content ; 6. The class met my needs o Very Satisfied Kl Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied :e3 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied E:i Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied G Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied I would recommend this class to a friend: ~Y es General Comments & Suggestions o No What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? (f you would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: or call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. ~ .~ ._~ ~...... SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title (!';J!2- Instructor In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. ::J Male M Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 t2l 36-45 0 46-.64 0 65+ I PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would vou rate the Lead Instmctor: I L Quality of-Instruction Q Very Satisfied Il9 Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied : 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm Q Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied .3. Punctuality Q Very Satisfied 129 Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied -1. Use of Class Time Q Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS Q Not Applicable doll' wouldyol/ rate the Assisting Instnlctors as a group: i. Quality of Instruction Q Very Satisfied IB Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very'dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm Q Very Satisfied 10 Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied, Q Very dissatisfied .3. Punctuality Q Very Satisfied Ii!} Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 4. Use of Class Time Q Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would )'011 rate the following Instnlctionat Method\', in regard to teaming the .\7Ibject mailer: . I. Lecture 0 Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 2. Slides 0 Very Satisfied a Satisfied ~ Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 3. VCR 0 Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied IX/ N/A 4. Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 1. Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area , Number of Sessions : Length of Sessions ~. Course Content ; The class met my needs PARTIV-CLASSFO~VCONTENT Q Very Satisfied In Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Q Very Satisfied I8l Satisfied Q Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Q Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Q Very Satisfied Iia Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied In Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied. Q Very dissatisfied Q Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 1 would recommend this class to a friend: I'Q Yes ',Jeneral Comments & Suggestions Q No What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? [fyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: or call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. _J .- Class Title . Instructor In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. o Male c1"Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 ~6-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How lI'ouldyou rate the Lead fns/mctor: . ] Quality ofInstruction 0 Very Satisfied ~Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ; 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied ft1 Satisfied a Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. Punctuality a- Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied a Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ; -1. Use of Class Time 0 Very Satisfied i6 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable : How would you rate the Assisting fnstmctors as a group: 'L Quality ofIl1struction 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm g,Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, 0 Very dissatisfied 3. Punctuality ~ry Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Use of Class Time ~Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied , PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS ,How would YOII rate the following Ins/mc/ional Me/hods, in regard to leaming the subject mailer: I. Lecture 0 Very Satisfied i!1 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A ") Slides 0 Very Satisfied .fI!!! Satisfied 0 Just Okay a Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A i. VCR 0 Very Satisfied "Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A i Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied .,. Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~T/CONTENT i . Description of Class -, Class Room/Area Number of Sessions 1. Length of Sessions S. Course Content 6. The class met my needs o Very Satisfied e Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied i6 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied e- Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied a Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied r would recommend this class to a friend: jlJ Yes CJ~neral Comments & Suggestions o No .~. ~" ._. -- SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION C]~ss Title C P (( Instructor..s 7EVe. In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. ~Male 0 Female Age: 0 Under]3 0 13-]8 0 19-25 0 26-35)Ef 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead Instmetor: I. Quality of Instruction Q Very Satisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm Q Very Satisfied 3. Punctuality Q Very Satisfied ! 4. Use of Class Time Q Very Satisfied Q Satisfied ~ Just Okay Ji!f Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Satisfied ~ Just Okay Q Satisfied Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Dissatisfied Q Dissatisfied Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o NOl Applicable : (01\' would you rate the A.!>:fisting Instnle/ors as a group: Quality ofIllstruction 0 Very Satisfied igf Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very "dissatisfied Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied t.f Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, 0 Very dissatisfied , Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied ,a Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Use of Class Time 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION 1v1ETHODS How would YOII rate the following Ins/mc/ional Methodf, in regard to learning the subject malter: I. Lecture Q Very Satisfied Q Satisfied 181 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 2. Slides Q Very Satisfied GQ Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Q N/A J. VCR Q Very Satisfied Q Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied ~ N/A 4. Scenarios Q Very Satisfied ri Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Q N/A I. Description of Class 2. Class Room! Area ~. Number of Sessions ~. Length of Sessions 5. Course Content r~ The class met my needs PART IV-CLASS FORMAVCONTENT Q Very Satisfied % Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied pi Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied Q Satisfied l8I Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied ~Satisfied Q Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied e:J Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied ta Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied [ would recommend this class to a friend: Q{ Yes 0 No General Comments & Suggestions ~ ,~tft, cr>-7 ,..H/Z ~~tl / ILZ What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? 41'.0 //1-' ~/Z#c/tr J'/7~A7/(U/5' )fyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are ;involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: f/3f/.-.32ctf /or call our office at 784-1002. ,. '" Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. .J ~ SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title C- P R Instructor In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we ate asking u to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. o Male~ Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-180 19-25 0 26-35 0 36-45 ~ 46-64065+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR I How 1I'0llfdvoII rate the Lead!fstntctor: L Quality of Instruction !tl: Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm 'Ci-- Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 3. Punctuality ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay ! 4. Use of Class Time Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable 11011' wOllfdyolI rate the Assisting Instn/ctors as a group: Quality ofInstruction 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied , Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, ,0 Very dissatisfied '. Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied .: Use of Class Time 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would )'ou rate the following Instn/ctional Methodl', in regard to leaming the slIbject matter: I. Lecture .fA Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Slides ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied -1. Scenarios Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PARTIV-CLASSFO~VCONTENT 1. Description of Class ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 2. Class Room/Area ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 3. Number of Sessions ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 1. Length of Sessions ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 5. Course Content ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied ;, The class met my needs Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied , would recommend this class to a friend: }( Yes 0 No .jeneral Comments & Suggestions o N/A o N/A o N/A o N/A o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? If you would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: or call our office at 784-1002, Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. _! . --~-...... .........-...._.... SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EV ALVA TION Cla~s Title (! P R Instructor /. In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we re asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We we/come both positive feedback and constructive criticism. CI Male 0 Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 '!A-65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR . !fOil' would vall rate the Lead Instmetor: . I. Quality ofInstruction ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm iU Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~. Punctuality IQ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied , Use of Class Time ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable !fOil' would )'01/ rate the Assis/ing Ins/me/ors as a group: I. Quality ofIl1struction . Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied .., Knowledge & Enthusiasm 'ii Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, .0 Very dissatisfied Punctuality ~ Very Satisfied . 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Use of Class Time ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How wouldyou rate theiol/owing Ins/metional Method~, in regard to leaming the subject matter: !. Lecture 'Elf Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 NI A Slides 11) Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 NI A ) VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A i. Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PART IV-CLASS FOR1tAT/CONTENT i. Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area ~. Number of Sessions I. Length of Sessions 5. Course Content 6. The class met my needs Itf Very Satisfied @B Very Satisfied o Very Satisfied OVery Sa(isfied o Very Satisfied o Very Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied 'Q., Satisfied Satisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied [ would recommend this class to a friend: J:I Yes General Comments & Suggestions o No What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? iCyou would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are nvolved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: )f call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. ~ .. - .... SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION /5.f- Class Title (f R (/as5 Instructor "5fcClc flq'i'sl7&JA1 In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants; we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. ~Male 0 Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 t:a 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead Instmctor: L Quality ofInstruction Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. Punctuality Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ,4. Use of Class Time Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS HolI' would you rate the Assisting Instmctors as a group: o Not Applicable ! Quality ofInstruction ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied " Knowledge & Enthusiasm )8 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, 0 Very dissatisfied Punctuality ]a Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied .j Use of Class Time Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION Iv1ETHODS How would YOIl rate the following Instmctional Method~, in regard to leaming the .\1Ibject matter: I. Lecture ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 2. Slides l'il Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 3. VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A : 4. Scenarios :Ja Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PART IV - CLASS FORMAT/CONTENT ; 1. Description of Class 2. Class Room! Area 3. Number of Sessions 4. Length of Sessions 5. Course Content O. The class met my needs ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied .lid Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Iia Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Igl Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ! would recommend this class to a friend: )!J Yes 0 No General Comments & Suggestions (}C''1 9PO' I<<,~" } f 'y / / / p What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? [fyou would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: or call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. M~ - r SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Ao~ In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are as' you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. o Male,a Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 J8l' 26-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead [nslmclor: I. Quality ofInstruction ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied /2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm Ii( Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 13. Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 14. Use of Class Time Q Very Satisfied &(Satisfied Class Title o.,Pr2 Instructor S+ev o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS i How would you rate the Assisting [nstmclors as a group: i I. Quality ofInstruction 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied '2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied .>. Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied ,4. Use of Class Time 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied )!s( Not Applicable o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied o Dissatisfied. 0 Very dissatisfied o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would you rate the following [nstmctional Method~, in regard to leaming the subject matter: I. Lecture )z( Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A 2. Slides )8( Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A , VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied -4 N/A L Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied ~Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~T/CONTENT 1. Description of Class ~Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. ClassRoom/Area Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. Number of Sessions Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Length of Sessions ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied .5. Course Content /1!t. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 6. The class met my needs ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied I woold ,<comm,nd thi, 01,,, to, fri'nd:~ y" . Q No . General Comments & Suggestions ~O (~~ What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? [fyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are nvolved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: J[ call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation, -. ~.-. -- .. SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Cla~s Title (>p~ Instructor 5-1<'r.J<:.. f4~eJ(ovl.1 In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are a~king you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism, :If Male 0 Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-] 8 0 19-25 0 26-35 181 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ i PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR i How would you rate the Lead l{J.slntctor: I. Quality ofInstruction 13 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay ! 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm r3 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay i 3. Punctuality ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 4. Use of Class Time Q; Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS i How would you rate the Assisting Instntctors as a group: i I. Quality ofInstruction 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied .2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied .3. Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied .4. Use of Class Time 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied ~Not Applicable o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied o Dissatisfied, .0 Very dissatisfied o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS II ow would you rate the following Instntctional Methods, in regard to learning the subject matter: I. Lecture 0 Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A ) Slides 0 Very Satisfied I2f. Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A i. VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied aN/A I. Scenarios ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~DCONTENT I. Description of Class ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Class Room/Area ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. Number of Sessions ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Length of Sessions C3.. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 5. Course Content &' Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied . 6. The class met my needs B-- Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied [ would reconunend this class to a friend: '6: Yes 0 No General Conunents & Suggestions Nhat classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? iCyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are nvolyed in, please provide us with your name and phone #: Jf call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. . ~.,~. - ~ -.. SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title C P/Z.- Instructor [n order to continue providing "Qualily Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. o Male g/female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-] 8 0 19-25 0 26-35 g-i6-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How wouldyou rate the Lead InsJmetor: L Quality ofInstruction i3YVery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm ~Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 3. PuncnJalilY 1.:1 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay t. Use of Class Time G:Y"Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS !fow wou/d)'ou rate the Assistint: Instmetors as a group: I. Quality of Instruction 13' Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm l!t Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, J. Punctuality fit Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied -L Use of CL,ss Time ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Not Applicable OVery-dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION !vfETHODS How would )'011 raje the following Instmetional Method~, in regard to learning the subject matter: I. Lecturt. ~/,Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Slides ur Very Satisfied 0 Salisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 3. VCR 0 Yery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Scenarios fiJ"Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o N/A o N/A GYN/ A o N/A PART IV - CLASS FORMAT/CONTENT i. Description of Class ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied , Class Room/Area ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ; Number of Sessions ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Length of Sessions iia" Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 5. Course Content (it Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ':i, The class met my needs ri" Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied [ would recommend this class to a friend: ~Yes 0 No :leneral Comments & Suggestions l/e ~ r 11-,1;1' 1Y1a:h j/-e.- Nhat classes o'r topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? [fyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are involyed in, please provide us with your name and phone #: Jr call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. -- - " SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EV ALUA TION Class Title r? ,/-1)/( Instructor In order to contmue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. . /' o Male ~male Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 e 26-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead Instmetor: 1. Quality of Instruction i Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 3. Punctuality Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 4. Use of Class Time Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS 0 Not Applicable i How would you rate the Assisting Instmetors as a group: . I. Quality of Instruction ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied ;: Knowledge & Enthusiasm Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied. ,0 Very dissatisfied : Punctuality Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied of. Use of Class Time Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS flow would you rate the following Instmctional Methods, in regard to leaming the subject matter: I. Lecture q:l Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ., Slides Itl Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay a Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied ) VCR b Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied of. Scenarios 10 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o N/A o N/A o N/A o N/A PART IV - CLASS FORMAT/CONTENT I. Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area 3. Number of Sessions 4. Length of Sessions 5. Course Content 6. The class met my needs Very Satisfied Very Satisfied Very Satisfied Very Satisfied Very Satisfied Very Satisfie o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied a Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied r would recommend this class to a friend: ;cneral Comments & Suggestions Yes o No Nhat classes o'r topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? if you would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are Il1volved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: Of call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. -" .~.,....... " SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title 0 \J R-. Instructor [n order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. o Male ~ Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 0 26-35 R3:l\ 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead Ins/metor: I. Quality of Instruction ~ Very Satisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm ~ Very Satisfied 3. Punctuality ~ Very Satisfied 4. Use of Class Time C9. Very Satisfied . 0 Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable How would you rale the Assisting Instmelors as a group: Quality ofInstruction ill Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied :: Knowledge & Enthusiasm ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, .0 Very dissatisfied ) Punctuality Q Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied t Use of Class Time ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS !fOil' would you rate the followillg IlIstme/iollal Method\', ill regard to leamillg the subject mailer: I. Lecture CiJ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 0 N/ A 2. Slides Gl Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A , VCR ~ Very Satisfied Q Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A -I. Scenarios GJ Very Satisfied Q Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PART IV-CLASS FORMAVCONTENT 1. Description of Class 2. Class Room/Area 3. Number of Sessions 4. Length of Sessions 5. Course Content 6. The class met my needs ill Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied [} Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied Q Just Okay . 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied [l Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied Q Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Q Very Satisfied ij) Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied , would recommend this class to a friend: 0 Yes _Jeneral Comments & Suggestions o No Nhat classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? ~ i r;\- \\ \ \\ [fyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are ;nvolved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: L Nl.. 'A ~ ~OlJ,)f\ lC;;L{ -It; d {I Jr call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. .e:::--- -~ -....".. .- ..-......,.....-..... " SAFETY FlRST, lNC. COURSE EVALUATION Class Title r. .p fJ... Instructor In order to continue providing "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. 'lS{L Male 0 Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-] 8 0 19-25 ~ 26-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How lI'ouldyou rale the Lead Inslmetor: I. Quality ofInstruction r;a Very Satisfied 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm I:i Very Satisfied 3. Punctuality Qll Very Satisfied j 4. Use of Class Time I3l Very Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Satisfied o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS ; HolI' would you rate the A!>'Sisting Instmetors as a group: i L Quality ofInstruction fB Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied ! 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm e Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied /3. Punctuality ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 14. Use of Class Time -Q Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Just Okay o Not Applicable o Dissatisfied 0 Very 'dissatisfied o Dissatisfied, .0 Very dissatisfied o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied o Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS , How would you rale the following Instmctionat Methodf. in regard 10 teaming the subjeel mailer: I. Lecture 0 Very Satisfied fl Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A ") Slides 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied ~ Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A VCR 0 Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 0 N/A -'. Scenarios .0 Very Satisfied ~ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/ A PARTIV-CLASSFO~TICONTENT I. Description of Class W> Very Satisfied 2. Class Room/Area 0 Very Satisfied -,. Number of Sessions rQ Very Satisfied 1. Length of Sessions 0 Very Satisfied ). Course Content Q Very Satisfied o. The class met my needs 0 Very Satisfied I would recommend this class to a friend: c& Yes o Satisfied ~ Satisfied Q Satisfied ~ Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied General Comments & Suggestions o Just Okay o Just Okay' Q Just Okay o Just Okay Q Just Okay o Just Okay o No o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied Q Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied What classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? (\AO-~, LcJ ~5 ,~~(, (lYrA' I ! f you would like information on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other JgJIs y~~~.5 ' involved in, please provide us with your name and phone #: ;1' call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. -! ,~ -- .... ..---..--- ,> j;; 'IIi; ,~9.., we :,9 .-P, Sl ~ '.,...,.. ........". . . . Of a e' (F'ema . '.~E ,:,t8.7.l3 J9.~' . ,~,:'~-.~"'":'~iJ~:. ..f'.....1.;..~..~~~~. -~,~{.~f:..! "~~...'~".-~'.;~:..,.'j';;,,~1r.:';. '.. <i~,:'h: >~t;':C~~i:~rZ\ft;:);i'~;".,:',~:r1R.-];~;;tgA!{~~{IgYCTO}(" .?~-;i~iy?;..;1i~1, ~'~~-c':(':-,c.' ," 'S:;I~~~:!;" Hpl'/;;~,g!!Jd YO'!r,t:l/~'f~~~: ff.~d Ins{l:llc{or: ,f>i/;';,::i'," ,;'. >:i.c'.,;:: '. '.' <, '.,:: ~x.Iid:,;'~,< ">:,:.';,;~,,: .:' 1:: Q4~ity.~q~I#iiu,~iiq~.:;f!'t.;"~;;7Y~!Y-Sat!~fi~~: 1 a.;Sat!~fi~d,~{q.J.~ir Okay, '2' 0,' D~S,~~!$fi~wr,'~o f:Y' e~,p~s~~~ .~...: 2, KnoWJedge&.Enthuslasm-c't:iir:V ery Satisfied ,'.'.0.' Satlsfied.',;Q:'1ust Okay.aDlssatJsfied >.;.a Yery dIssatIsfied' . 3":P~~f1~itY_,:~;~', '" "~r'I.:';;'.~-..,~l2f Y(:rySat~sfi~~::'.a '. Sat~sfie,ct,:'a, JustOkay...O ri~s~~iI~~~d ..... (;) V'ery'd!s~i~i~jJi9i 4;;U.se:.ofClass TIme";',,;,,; 't:l Very SatIsfied .,a SatIsfied,. Oc]ust Okay. a DIssatisfied. a Very dlssatiSfie,di .' .}5:~~~ff:< :'. ':,<;,:: :)~":;,'-;p ART n -)\SSISTINO IN~IRUCTORS .... :: '. <-':" :: ,::tel. Nqt APPii:~~~ : Hbw.w?j'u!4you rOletheAsSislingl?istntcioiiasa.J,Tfoiip..::::::::,,>, ',:' :' " c ,..... : / :"::'::"'::'. ,);"':"':~:;'r:';'k'::; . J;Q~~,i~of ~~stru~cii()~:;'f!~~.,~ ;\'iiVSat~~fi<:d,~; a :}~~t!~fied':fP Just, okay ;,a ,~!~s.a!!~fied ,:~~q:'VerY:d!ssit!sfii~ . 2::~~~1~.gC? &~ ~~~h~,t~T,,~,\yt;!Y S,at~sftl<g:'iq~:~~l~sfi.ep ,~~~ Just, Ok,a~'q:D~~~~!!~fi5dl' :Q.: Very.:q~s,s~~~~~J .' 3<PPRiW;U~ty:' ,r-/f:~':~~;~.:~h;.::'Qf.Y~ry~a,t~sfiecl;t ::q;S~t!~fi,~d, }..a;i!l1st9.kay: :,0" D~~s~t!~~.~diO 'Y e~'d~ss~t~~Q~ . .',}~ 4.. Use;pf.cJass"flme;;;,>t,~c,."r:tv ery SatJsfied:A~ 0 ,Satlsfi,ed ..4a.~Just Okay '~,~Dlssatlsfied .",a eVery dlssatlsfi~.: _ ;,:.,,; i "t . ,,:>:\. :1:':;'),\~';1~~;/:::~..~'.'f:i/1>A'D 'T'mr')ThTS'rDUCTT"~r''Pt'mTH' "OD' ':~~i"';;;!; " .(;7;~ , ;:,,::t>f~'; :~~:;:':',!;:i;:'~,::~~;';?~~' 'tf,~i~)-')J' J,':J.H', f~!<"'.'...,(;\':ff1fA.\.~; ,,',,' ;'0,-' . ..:::i:);<:<:,~, '~c:';~.:.~ ~ HO~;~J/1J!!,d:y.()llrat~'!~gf~/!oU:f"~llstn~cfio!1.at}.{etMr!s' 'l1ll,eK.ard !q/ea'!'ing ~~(tSJ'bje~~,1?!a/(~t::}; :;.... ',; :';'~,~.j; 0-; ;?;.';':i;/ I ,\L:9tl1f~.: .]i'. V~9'J)at~~fie~j'_:,Q. Sat!sfi~d;:. a l~st O~~:.;~.O;P'~s~~t~sfied:.:;a ,V~r;Y,::~l,~~ll!~fi~F:r;.a N/A.:;;ii',: .,:,,3~~l 2.' Slides>:.. . ~YelJ.' Satl~fi~;.LO<;Satlsfied.:; 0 JlI,st O~!l>::,; apl~~atl~~~ J:,O,N~~;,~I,~~~Y~fl~P.O,Ntt\"; ~~;15~Y: 13, V9t.~.",., a.y elJ.::~~t!s,fi~d,;aS~t!sfi~d :~f- a..Just Ok.~r::O~])!ss.at!sfied ~(p."y~it~f~f~t!~fied,:..O '., N/A-".:~: *~;,~\.t ! 4. Scenanos' ~VerySatlsfied,.,;;a SatIsfied .,..a, Just Okay ....a.Dlssatlsfied.,O ~Very!dlssatlsfiect;:,a. Nl.A,A"~ ~~'>y;: . ;,"':-'-:2._;::~'.-, ""~<' C:' ;" ":'~';c:.;" "'pART IV~'CL.AsS FORMAT/CONTEm"'" .< '::,,) :"<:1::;:'" ';\:::}:'j~~';:{":"::~':'" .i;:.~i~~./.",..,:,,~.:;..\,.,:'<;'~'"<;;'~''' ;,~ >:''''J.~'t":' "~":"";::}":':\;'l.~: ~ 1..D~:~p.~i()~OfCla,ss~::{,~:~,V~rySat!sfiedt.,a '.S~~!sfied}Q'Ju~10kay\a'D!~~l,lH" ~,;:.;q;X~rY'd!ssa!~sg~ ~:.;.. 2..C1assRoomlArea><_ ". ,~Very SatIsfied, a SatIsfied'. ,Q Just Okay "aDlssatlsfied.,;a Very dlssatlstied':~'>;!. , 3 :N.~ber' of Sessions..:.' --: ~ Very Satisfied 0 S~tisfied a,IustOkay'O Dissatisfied- 0 -V ery.di~Satistied:tY . , : .4::~~€:9f S~ssil?~(':,: ~'JD~ra:y~J)' Satisfi.ecL::'a, S,~~isfie~ .Cq)~st Okay' . aDi~'s~t@edh9 ~KerY'dis~atis~M;' 5/.~R,w:~e; ~~l1~e%::l:,,\~:,/:j,~ ~y ~~ Silt~~~:c!.f?q; ~~t~~tie,~, ;;'.7a,: Jti~t .okar ..0... P!~~~t!~fi~d.;::~q ,~ery:d!~~~~~ti~: o;;.'flie~ass met my.needs'.,i;m.z:V ery,Satlsfied~~~a ,Satlsfied,.<O]ustOkay: .a~Dlssatlsfied .:QV ery dlssatlsfi,ed, ~""'.~~";.,-- ..,...''''-~..fiU. ';J'-t~ :(!''''''~.>;''''-''''- .,,'-<.:-.....l..~., ..~."..,."...". ,,_:'. .',\ .;)f.lula;,r.l"f.'.9;. -', ,~~.- t,.~~~ j;loJ^,1",'l~~""~~! ~~>~ ~-, C,' ,.. .,_~~~"~~:t~ " ,~~~W;'~ . ~-1J: .~ .~~. r.~......,'...-" - " ' '1'l!1 .. ,;.~""'" ,'-, '$;"# / -.- ~ '~"~"''l~:}'''~''''f'f_''~ . SAFETY FlRST, lNC. COURSE EVALUATION . . Class Title C Pf Instructor. In order to continue providing. "Quality Education" for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes. We welcome both positive feedback and constructive criticism. o Male"B-Female Age: a Under 13 a 13-18 a 19-25'9. 26-35 a 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Le.(!.d Instmctor: 1. Quality ofInstruction "Q. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm'G.. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 3. Punctuality ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 4, Use of Class Time --a.....Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS o Not Applicable How would you rate the Assisting Instmctors as a group: J, Quality ofInstruction '--9, Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied ! 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm"a Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied. ,0 Very dissatisfied ! J. Punctuality ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Use of Class Time '0.. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION ?v1ETHODS How would you rate the following Instmctional Methods, in regard to learning the subject matter: I. Lecture ~ V ery Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/ A 2. Slides 'i3-., Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A l. VCR --a Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/ A :. Scenarios ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 0 N/A PARTIV-CLASSFO~VCONTENT J. Description of Class --a. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Class Room/Area ---0.. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied O' Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied J. Number of Sessions -----a.. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 4. Length of Sessions ~ Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 5. Course Content -0.. Very Satisfied 0 Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied. 0 Very dissatisfied 6. The class met my needs ~ Very Satisfied a Satisfied 0 Just Okay a Dissatisfied a Very dissatisfied [would recommend this class to a friend: ~es 0 No General Comments & Suggestions~ t.-.'jt>.AI'".-.,..:::r;-.., :) ,\'hat classes or topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? :ryou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are nvolyed in, please provide us with your name and phone #: Jf call our office at 784-1002. Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. _ r. .- '...-..--. ,- ....~,._-~... 4 SAFETY FIRST, INC. COURSE EVALUATION . . Cla:s Title U ~ Instructor In order to continue providing "Quality Educationll for course participants, we are asking you to help us by completing this evaluation sheet. Your honest answers will assist us in meeting this goal for future classes, We welcome bothyositive feedback and constructive criticism.. /' 'J Male ~ Female Age: 0 Under 13 0 13-18 0 19-25 i!J 26-35 0 36-45 0 46-64 0 65+ PART I - LEAD INSTRUCTOR How would you rate the Lead fnstmetor: , L Quality ofInstruction 0 Very Satisfied I' 2. Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied J. Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied '4. Use of Class Time Q Very Satisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied I PART II - ASSISTING INSTRUCTORS 0 Not Applicable 'How would you rate the Assisting lnstmetors as a !roup: , L Quality of Instruction 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very'dissatisfied .., Knowledge & Enthusiasm 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied, 0 Very dissatisfied l. Punctuality 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied , Use of Class Time 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied PART III - INSTRUCTION METHODS How would you rate the following InJfmctional Methods, in regard to leaming the subject mailer: I. Lecture 0 Very Satisfied I!i/Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 0 Very dissatisfied 2. Slides 0 Very Satisfied I:!:I Satisfied 0 Just Okay Q Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied J. VCR 0 Very Satisfied ,?/Satisfied Q Just Okay o Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied 4. Scenarios 0 Very Satisfied GJ Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied o N/A o N/A I3'N/A o N/A PART IV-CLASS FOR1tAVCONTENT I. Description of Class 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied 2. Class Room/Area 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied Q Just Okay' 0 Dissatisfied 3. Number of Sessions 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied' 4. Length of Sessions Q Very Satisfied Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied ,5. Course Content Q Very Satisfied Satisfied 0 Just Okay 0 Dissatisfied 6. The class met my needs 0 Very Satisfied Satisfied Q Just Okay Q Dissatisfied [ would recommend this class to a friend: aI Yes 0 No G"ornIComm,."&Sugg.,'ions vY. W7M. ~'!: ~ ~ _~lmdU-V-UU ~ t'- ~e3' _J I~_i/L~ IA4I- 7 o Very dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied Q Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied o Very dissatisfied ;/ What classes o'r topics would you like to see offered in future sessions? [fyou would like infonnation on how Safety First, Inc. can provide a class for other groups you are ,llvolyed in, please provide us with your name and phone #: Of call our office at 784-1002. fiI Thank you for your time in completing this evaluation. - ,.,~ - .0; ...--..--. DECEIVED I MAY 1 3 1994 CITY OF A/\JDOVER Report for Forest Meadows Street Improvements City Project 94-12 Andover, Minnesota May 1994 File No. 17162 May 10, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, Minnesota 55304 Re: Forest Meadows Street Improvements City Project No 94-12 File No. 17162 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the construction of streets within the Forest Meadows Addition south of 181st Avenue and east of Hanson Boulevard. The report contains a detailed cost estimate of the work being proposed and a plan of the area, We would be pleased to meet with the City Council and City Staff at your convenience to review the contents of this report. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLlK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~L;eu Glenn R. Cook, P.E. GRC:kf I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supelVision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ~LIC ~t Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Date: May 10, 1994 Reg. No. 9451 Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Introduction Discussion Project Cost and Assessments Conclusions & Recommendations Appendix - Cost Estimates Figure No. 1 - Street Construction and Typical Section City of Andover Forest Meadows Street Improvements 1. 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. 2 Introduction The City of Andover has requested this report to determine the feasibility of constructing the streets within the Forest Meadows Addition, south of 181st Avenue and east of Hanson Boulevard. The City received a petition from the property owners requesting street improvements in the area. The streets are presently a 22' to 26 foot wide rural section made up of a fine sand and gravel base. The proposed rural section would be a 24 foot wide bituminous surface similar to that constructed in other parts of the City. This section is in accordance with the City standard for a temporary rural residential streets, There are no traffic counts available for the Forest Meadows area. An estimate of approximately 240 vehicles for the average daily traffic count may be made assuming that twenty-four of the proposed lots in the area will use the roads and each lot will have 10 trips daily. The streets presently serve a confined residential area, Soil borings have not been taken in the area. Preliminary investigation indicates a find sand subgrade, we anticipate no additional soil investigation will be necessary prior to construction. The storm water runoff presently drains to the low areas in and along the roadway and percolates into the soil. Existing pipe culverts facilitate this drainage in the ditches along the streets. City of Andover Forest Meadows Street Improvements 3 Discussion The construction of streets within the Forest Meadows area will first consist of grading and shaping the existing roadway to the design grade and crown. Four inches of Class 5 aggregate base will then be placed over the prepared subgrade. The roadway will then be surfaced with two and one-half inches of bituminous wear course, The proposed rural section will have three foot wide shoulders that consist of topsoil and sod. All existing driveways will be matched with gravel base and/or bituminous surfacing. The construction of ten foot long bituminous driveway aprons off the edge of the pavement is proposed for all existing gravel driveways. The existing centerline and driveway culverts along the roadway will be utilized for drainage. The drainage in all areas will be directed to low areas that presently have storm water draining to them. The overall storm sewer plan for the area has not been implemented, The existing system is currently working satisfactorily and no problems have been identified. Sodding with topsoil is proposed for the majority of the lawn areas that will be disrupted by the road construction. For the purpose of creating an alternative with a reduced project cost, we have provided a cost estimate that excludes all sodding. This alternative provides for the restoration with seeding and muldl, utilizing borrowed topsoil. City of Andover Forest Meadows Street Improvements 4 Project Costs and Assessments The project costs for the street improvements are outlined in this section, The itemized cost estimates are provided in the appendix and include a 5 percent contingency; 18 percent for legal, engineering and administration and 5 percent for bonding and capitalized interest. The indicated unit prices are as projected for the 1994 construction season. (ENR5450 Mpls.) Estimated Project Cost $148,085 Alternate: Project Cost with seeding (in lieu of sodding) $139,625 The project costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners adjacent the streets on a unit basis, There are 24 lots along the streets which are proposed to be assessed. The cost per unit for the improvement based on 24 assessable units is $6,170,00. The cost per unit for the seeding alternative is $5,818,00. City of Andover Forest Meadows Street Improvements 5 . . Conclusions and Recommendations The project as reviewed herein is feasible as it relates to general engineering principals and construction procedures. Based on information contained in this report, it is recommended that: 1. This report be adopted by the City of Andover as a guide for construction of the street improvements, 2. TIle City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to a public hearing. 3. A public hearing be held to detennine further action to be taken. The property owners adjacent to the roadway should be notified for hearing purposes, 4. The following schedule be implemented for the project: Receive preliminary report Hold public hearing Order plans and specifications Approve plans and specifications Bid date Award contract Start construction Complete construction May 17, 1994 June 7, 1994 June 7, 1994 June 21, 1994 July 15, 1994 July 19, 1994 August 1, 1994 October 14, 1994 City of Andover Forest Meadows Street Improvements 6 Appendix Cost Estimates Proposed Street Improvements Forest Meadows Addition Item Base preparation Class 5 aggregate base Type 41 bituminous wear material AC-l bituminous material for mixture Remove and replace culvert 15" CMP culvert 15" flared end section Remove bituminous surfacing Driveway restoration Topsoil borrow Sodding Ditch grading Alternate Unit Estimated Estimated Unit Price Quantity Cost SY 0.75 15,000 $ 11,250.00 TN 6.50 4,400 28,600.00 TN 15.00 2,100 31,500.00 TN 130,00 136 17,680.00 LF 10.00 50 500.00 LF 18.00 400 7,200.00 EA 50,00 20 1,000.00 Sy 2.00 200 400.00 SY 7.50 300 2,250.00 CY 8,00 400 3,200,00 Sy 2,00 4,500 9,000.00 LF 5,00 250 1.250.00 Total Estimated Const. Cost $113,830.00 + 5% Contingency 5.690.00 $119,525,00 + 18% Legal, Engr., Admin, 21.515.00 + 5% Bond, & Capital Interest 7,050.00 Total Project Cost $148,085.00 Total Project Cost w/Seeding in lieu of sodding $139,625 Cost Estimates Appendix 7 IBIs! Ave. N,W_ 6 6 3i Z ~ CD 3i Vi Z c: '\ 2 0 ~ " 2 ~05 2 x () .3 .3 4 N o 200 I Scale in feet 400 I TYPICAL SECTION 2-1/2" BIT, WEAR MATERIAL, TYPE 41 4" CLASS 5 AGG. BASE 2" TOPSOIL SHOULDER STREET IMPROVEMENTS ANDOVER, MINNESOTA FOREST MEADOWS ADDITION FIGURE 1 CITY PROJECT 94- 7 .11. Bonestroo ~ Rosene 8 Anderlik & '\J' Associates 17162S01.DWG MAY 1994 COMM. 17162