The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC February 15, 1994 .~ CITY of ANDOVER / Regular city Council Meeting - February 15, 1994 Call to Order - 7:00 P.M. Resident Forum Agenda Approval Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes Proclamation-Volunteers of America Week Discussion Items '\ / 1. Continued Public HearingjWoodland Meadows street Lights 2. Rezoning/Crown pointe & Crown pointe East, Continued 3. Special Use Permit/Steps of Success Homes 4. Jed Larson Sketch plan 5. Amend Ordinance 8, Sections 4.04 and 8.23 6. Amend Ordinance 17 7. Adopt Ordinance 103/Street Name Change 8. Receive Bids/1994 Equipment Certificates HRA Meeting 9. 1994 CDSG Budget Discussion Reports of Staff, Committees, Commissions 10. Schedule Work Session Consent Agenda/Non-Discussion Items 11. Receive Feasibility Study/Indian Meadows/93-24 12. Receive Feasibility Study/173rd Ln, 174th, Heather/91-20 13. Receive Feasibility Study/Pine Hills/93-18 14. Award Bid/93-10/SuperAmerica 15. Solicit Quotes/Lighting for City Hall Park Complex/94-1 16. Declare Cost, Order Assessment RolljWoodland Pond 17. Accept Feasibility ReportjWoodland Creek 4th/93-31 Mayor-Council Input Payment of Claims Adjournment ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED tn Approval of Minutes FOR AGENDA ITEM Admin. r-o. Volk 0.0. BY: Approval of Minutes v. The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: February 1, 1994 Regular Meeting ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ TO: PROCLAMATION /' WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, a Christian human service organization, is celebrating its 98th year of service to the people of Minnesota and the nation; it is therefore certainly appropriate for us, the City of Andover to join in the observance of this milestone with the commemoration of March 6-13, 199-1 as Volunteers of America Week; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is making a valuable contribution to providing these services to adults and the elderly: 6 homes for mentally disabled, mentally ill. chemically dependent and/or elderly adults; congregate dining for seniors at -15 sites in Anoka and Hennepin Counties; home delivered meals for persons 60 years of age and over; semi-independent living services and supported living services; 3 housing complexes for families, the handicapped, and the elderly, and -I long-term heal1h care facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America provides these services for children and youth: 5 programs serving (JJltistic, autistic-like, and/or development-ally disabled children andyouth; a children's emergency shel1er; in-home services; 52 foster treatment homes ond co"ection group homes; a residential treatment center for emotionally handicapped boyS; a speciali:ed behavioral program for boys with severe problems; short-term after care for youth with special needs; and. WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America provide 2 co"ectional services: a pre-release ond work-release co"ectional program serving men; and a women'sjail. workhouse and work-release correctional program; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, through its dedicated staff and volunteers and the 11Ulny people who help support their work through finoncial contributions make a significant impact on the lives of people in Andover; and, j WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is commemorating its founding in 1896 and urges others to join them in bridging the gap between human needs and the resources of the public and private sector: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, that I, J. E. McKelvey, Mayor of the City of Andover, do hereby proclaim the week of March 6-13, 199./, as VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IN ANDOVER. AND BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this proclamation be transmitted to the Volunteers of America as evidence of our esteem. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Andover to be affIXed this 15th day of February in the year of our Lord one thousond nine hundred and ninety four. J. E. McKelvey, Mayor ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA SECTION (\(). Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM (\(). Todd J. Haas, Engineeri~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA Continued Public Hearing/ Woodland Meadows street Lights w I. The City Council is requested to continue the public hearing for Project 93-8, Woodland Meadows street lights. The City Council tabled the public hearing from the February 1, 1994 meeting and directed the Assistant City Engineer to renotify property owners in all of the Woodland Meadows area because of some conflicting information regarding the cost of street lights and the style of light that would be installed (see attached letter sent to property owners). MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: \ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA " RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ABANDONING THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREET LIGHTING PROJECT NO. 93-8, IN THE WOODLAND MEADOWS AREA. WHEREAS, pursuant to the required published and mailed notice, such hearing was held on the 18th day of January, 1994; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard were given such opportunity for same; and \ J WHEREAS, the majority of the people opposed the improvement on the north end and the street costs increased by 10% on the south end. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that the Council hereby determines not to undertake the improvement proposed in the Council Resolution No. 269-93 adopted November 11 , 19 93 for the north half and reschedule a public hearing for February-IS , 19-2i for the south half. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 1st day of February , 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk J t~' CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 \ j " February 3, 1994 Re: Continued Public Hearing - street Lights - Woodland Meadows (project 93-8) , / Dear Property Owner: The City Council at their meeting on February 1, 1994 made a motion to continue the public hearing to 7:00 PM February 15, 1994 and send letters to all property owners in all of Woodland Meadows areas because of some conflicting information regarding the cost of street lights and the style of light that would be installed. 1. The billing of the lights will range from $26.82 to $29.52 per lot per quarter. This may increase or decrease depending on Anoka Electric Cooperative energy and maintenance charges. 2. The style of light is a 4 sided decorative light on a black pole. If you are interested in the appearance of the street light or the intensity of the light itself, please drive to Woodland Ridge development which is located to the west of Woodland Meadows west of the intersection of 174th Lane NW and Verdin Street NW. In addition, all previous petitions and letters that have been submitted are considered invalid. Each property owner (one (1) vote per lot) therefore must sign the petition that will be available at City Hall (valid ID must be made available) prior to the public hearing on February 15, 1994 (doors will be open at 6:30 PM) or you may send a letter to my office indicating a yes or no vote, if you are unable to attend the meeting. Property owners may also sign the petition anytime during normal City Hall hours (8:00 AM - 4:30 PM) prior to the meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, 14/~ Todd J. Haas Assistant City Engineer ) TJH:rja 03 32 24 33 0007 Ingo & Lucille Schalwig 2281 - 174th Circle NW Andover, MN 55304 : ") 32 24 33 0010 ~,vin & Peggy Kuntz 2268 - 174th Circle NW Andover, MN 55304 " 03 32 24 33 0013 Charles & Kim Labeaux 2233 - 173rd Circle Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0003 Lawrence B Carlson 830 W Main st Anoka, MN 55303 10 32 24 21 0005 Don & Mary Leverson 17240 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 ,"\ 32 24 22 0006 . ,Efrey & Vicki zierden 2205 - 172nd Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 22 0009 Raymond & Karen Bonine 17281 uplander St NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0011 Steven & Michele Kokosh 17623 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0006 D.A. & J .R. Flores 2089 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0009 Douglas & Pamela Rietkerk 2066 - 175th Ln NW ""lover, MN 55304 , .J 03 32 24 33 0008 Ronald & Elizabeth Krebs 2301 - 174th Circle ~T Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 33 0011 Charles & Mary Grider 3652 Buchanan st Mpls, MN 55418 03 32 24 33 0014 Patrick & Betty Jo Ha~na 2250 - 173rd Circle Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0004 Ronald & Teresa Dvoracek 17280 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0006 C.D. & L. Edmonson 17230 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 22 0007 Jeffrey & Vicki Zierden 2205 - 172nd Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0009 Kurt & Mary Morse 17679 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0012 L. Linde & s. Schaffer 17595 Partridge St NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0007 Gennaro & Marcie Sposito 2023 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0010 Thomas & Mary Wherry 2106 - 175th Ln NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0012 l1\;t~d -.\ JW 03 32 24 34 0013 Lawrence B Carlson b~ M. Eckman & s. Swanson 830 W Main \13ql~~~\c\lQ. 17321 Partridge st NW Anoka, MN 55303 ~~Andover, MN 55304 '~D\lV,l\l"., '\ ~.')3Ul 03 32 24 33 0009 Kevin & Rebecca Scheid 17450 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 33 0012 Steven & Lora Loahr 4006 Dupont Ave N Mpls, MN 55412 03 32 24 33 0015 Keith & Diane Moore 2220 - 173rd Circle Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0004 Thomas & Catherine Perkins 17270 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0007 Gerald & Lori Sobieck 2159 - 172nd Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 22 0008 WM. C. & Theresa Kuether 17231 Uplander st NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0010 Beverly Lamon 17641 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0005 Mark & Shawna Slick 17567 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0008 Dale & Lisa Winzenread 2022 - 175th Ln NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0011 Jeff & Diane ToIlette 2140 - 175th Ln NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0014 D. & S. Barrett 17271 Partridge St NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0015 Lawrence B Carlson 830 W Main Anoka, MN 55303 ') 32 24 21 0011 hubert & Linda Isaacson 17231 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0014 Kevin & Debra squier 2138 - 172nd Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 22 0010 James & Nancy posl 17170 uplander Circle Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 22 0013 Robert & Julie Winberg 17171 Uplander Circle NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 42 0002 "'chard K Thomas , )7 - 176th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 33 0004 Dean W & Juliann K Hunter stephen P & Sarah M Wiatrak 2731 - 167th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 32 0015 Mark W & vicki L Daniels 17533 Uplander st. NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0002 James J Dunn 2162 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 32 0004 Randy & Barbara Nuernberg 2265 - 176th Lane NW - ~over, MN 55304 , / 03 32 24 31 0003 Craig & Mona Valenty 2105 - 176th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 34 0016 Jeffrey & Cindy Waaler- 17251 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0012 Joseph & Annette Ward 2070 - 172nd Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0015 Dr. Tracy Andrews 11236 Robinson Dr. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 10 32 24 22 0011 Dale & Tracy Grunwald 17130 uplander Circle Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 22 0014 Brian & Harlan L. Rick 2250 - 172nd Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 33 0002 Rodney H & Norma A Johnson 17496 Uplander st. NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0010 Terry & Lynn Kraus 17241 Partridge st NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0013 Brian & Jean Nolby 2110 - 172nd Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 21 0016 Lawrence B. Carlson 830 W Main Anoka, MN 55303 10 32 24 22 0012 P.K. & L.M. Beckermann 17131 uplander Circle Andover, MN 55304 10 32 24 22 0015 Patrick Ayers 17132 Swallow st NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 33 0003 Lawrence B Carlson 830 W Main st. Anoka, MN 55303 03 32 24 33 0005 10 32 24 22 0003 10 32 24 22 0002 GR & AH Ellingson stephen M & Jodie A Laliberte17230 uplander st. 17280 uplander St. NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 32 0016 Gilbert & Cynthia Maling 22421 SE 329th st. Auburn, WA 98002-1418 03 32 24 32 0014 Wayne & Janice McClosky 2362 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 32 0005 Stephen & Mary Saxon 2207 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 32 0006 Marvin & Diane Geiger 17629 Thrush st NW Andover, MN 55304 NW 03 32 24 33 0006 Richard & Ramona Larso: 2200 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 32 0003 Timothy & Terri Thompson 2315 - 176th Lane NW Andover, Mn 55304 03 32 24 31 0002 Randy & Kathryn Kuhlma! 13858 Silverod ct. NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 32 0007 James & Theresa Elling 2204 - 176th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0004 Raymond & Pamela Stacherski 2156 - 176th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 , '32 24 31 0007 J ~~ry J & Lynette Kremer 17550 Partridge St. NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0010 Larry W & JK Kirschenmann 2368 - 176th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0013 Daniel & Mary Slinde 2319 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 woodlandmeadowsst.lights \ ) , . I 03 32 24 31 0005 Christopher & Julie Salitros 17634 Patridge st. NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0008 Gary E & Louise Jacobs 2181 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0011 James M & Cheryl A Barber 2316 - 176th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 32 0008 Thomas & Pauline Nielsen 2211 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0006 Craig & Kathryn Sicard 17604 Partidge St. NW Andover, MN 55304 03 32 24 31 0009 Colin & Margrethe Anderson 17577 Thrush st. NW Andover, MN ~5304 03 32 24 31 0012 Dean & Beth Jones 2367 - 175th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 WOODLAND MEADOWS ) Formula used to determine street lighting costs: " $12,750.00 installing costs ~ 13 lights - $980.77 cost/light The cost of each street light per month for 5 years at 8.75% interest is $20.24. $20.24 + $10.16 (flat monthly rate) = $30.40/month/light $30.40 cost of lilht/mo. X 3 mos./qtr. = $28.24/lot/qtr. 3.23 * 0 lots/light $28.24/lot/qtr. AEC $ 1.28 overhead; computer; postage (city) $29.52/qtr./lot or $118.08/yr./lot The City of Andover is paying AEC monthly and lots will be billed quarterly by the City. J Bill all lots. Woodland Meadows (42 residential lots benefit from the street lights) Woodland Meadows Street Light Cost 2/1/94 / ) \ ) \ J WOODLAND MEADOWS Formula used to determine street lighting costs: " $20,940.00 installing costs 7 22 lights = $951.82 cost/light The cost of each street light per month for 5 years at 8.75% interest is $19.64. $19.64 + $10.16 (flat monthly rate) = $29.80/month/light $29.80 cost of light/mo. X 3 mos./qtr. = $25.54/lot/qtr. 3.50 # of lots/l~ght $25.54/lot/qtr. AEC $ 1.28 overhead; computer; postage (city) $26.82/qtr./lot or $107.28/yr./lot The City of Andover is paying AEC monthly and lots will be billed quarterly by the City. Bill all lots. Woodland Meadows (77 residential lots benefit from the street lights) Woodland Meadows Street Light Cost 2/3/94 .#';\ , .-:f " .... ~ , '1 / / ~. ,. c 'L (") :: :0 Q:J t:J o .. "< 'Ii ':l :< ~;> r.l =." ; ...; ~ =. ~ .e r.l " - ,- It:. : ~ ~t - ~t: ~ o.r_ _ - ~ o o CJ r ~ Z o s: m ~ CJ o -- <: (J) ~..'" t "r ~". III . . . n -, ~ , " c....> c:::> ~ - {; -.... ~ II',.' ~ . ~ ~ + ~ ~- w...~ "~W~li ~ .; a 7f-' I, \'" Ii -~ 61- J\ . \ ---Et I I 5f- 'I I ~ t< .... ~ / 2 ~4. .1ou.1 ....~ 'l> ~ , ... 4 '" .... ," 7 . 4f-. 3f- ~ ~ 8 ...... ......v . 1(;, ...... , -'- z -'- 3 5 ... 6 '7 ~ 3 -'- 4 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. Rezoning - Crown pointe and Crown pointe East R-1 to R-4 Ashford Development Corp. Planning ~ BY: ~. David L. Carlberg City planner REQUEST This item was removed from the December 7, 1993 City Council meeting at the request of the applicant (letter attached) until a decision on the Major Amendment to the Comprehensive plan - 235 acre MUSA expansion request was made. The Metropolitan Council on January 27, 1994 approved the amendment, therefore the applicant has requested the item be placed on the Council's agenda. The Andover City Council is asked to review the request of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. to rezone from R-1, single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban the property legally described on the attached resolution. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and zoning Commission, at their September 14, 1993 meeting, made the motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning. Attached are the minutes for Council review. Attached is a resolution for Council review and approval. NOTE: The Council must make a decision on whether to approve or deny the rezoning request as the review period has expired. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: ~ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REZONING REQUEST OF ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTIONS 25 AND 26, LEGALLY DESCRIBED BELOW FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO R-4, SINGLE FAMILY URBAN. WHEREAS, Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. has requested a rezoning from R-1, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban on the property legally described on the attached Exhibit A. WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B) and that there is no substantial negative effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands; there will be no negative effects on the values of property and scenic view in the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds that the request is in compliance with Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02; and , ) WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was much sincere well spoken and well documented opposition to said rezoning especially in regard to management of the wetlands; and WHEREAS, the planning and Zoning Commission recommends the City Council approval of the rezoning request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and zoning Commission and hereby approves the rezoning of the property legally described on Exhibit A from R-1, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 15th day of February, 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. McKelvey, Mayor ATTEST Victoria Volk, City Clerk , J EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 32, Range 24, lying Easterly of the Great Northern Railway Company right-of-way, Anoka County, Minnesota AND That part of the south 689.24 feet as measured along the west line thereof, of the southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the centerline of prairie Road as now laid out and traveled. Except that part described as follows: That part of the south 340.00 feet, as measured at right angles, of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying east of the west 855.56 feet, thereof, as measured at right angles, and lying westerly of the centerline of prairie Road as now laid out and traveled. J January 28, 1994 Mr. Daryl E. Sulander City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mr. Sulander, We respectively request that the rezoning for the properties listed in our rezoning request of August 16, 1993 be placed on the February 15, 1994, Andover City Council adgenda for their consideration. Thank you. Sincerely, ~~. ( 7 . ~bL 0Jui/th.zi. Jerry Windschitl Carol Windschitl / J..L,'_ ,-" -'-, ..L...L.. ..:'=' r:,hC"_'."_r L'."_nc...r--. L..H~'4 ~' ~ .' , oL-.'L- mm \gm , PHONE (612) 421-5151 FAX (612) ~lJ.3618 Babcock Locher Neilson & Marl/lelJa ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 JAMts M NEILSON fELl X A. MANNELLA ROBERT F. MA"NELLA CARY T. L.FLEUR THOMAS A. f(U/'oT STEPIIEN J. NASf/ , GItEGORY J. IlELLlSGS ' ltANDALL J. l'UUH <OLE!;N J. CAllLSTEDT.JOH.'1SON F. A,~ONY M.'.m~aLA' . EDMUND~, HABCOCK. 0( C""n",1 LANDOL J. LoCHER. 01 Co.n.., December 7, 1993 VIA: Fax & Hand Delivered City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Attn: David L. Carlberg, City Planner RE: Gerald and Carol Windschitl Rezoning - Crowne Point and Crown Pointe East Rl to R4 Please remove the above-referenced rezoning item from the Andover City Council's agenda for tonights Council meeting. Please keep this rezoning item off the City's Council agenda until the Metropolitan Council approves the City of Andover's amendments to j their comprehensive plan or until my clients request to have this rezoning item placed back on the City Council's agenda. SJN:smc Ene. / Page 7 \ I A public hearing was held. There was some opposition to the plat, largely regarding the ecological aspects of it. Discussion: to the city is provided Commission. Todd Haas noted that the Water Resources Plan is new and we have to make sure that all of the information prior to the time the plat comes to the Planning Vote on Motion: 5 yes (Dehn, Peek, Squires, Putnam, Apel), I no (Jovanovich) vote. Motion carried. Commissioner Jovanovich stated that she voted no as she would like to see further ecological studies done on the property. Recess 10:20 - Reconvene 10:25. ~ Public Hearing/Rezoning/Ashford Development Corporation Mr. Carlberg reviewed the rezoning request from R-l to R-4, noting that a portion of the property is Crown pointe. The property will be served by sanitary sewer and water. The Comprehensive plan shows this property to be in the 1990-1995 time period. If the Metropolitan Council denies our request to include this property in the Metropolitan Service ~rea, then the property will have to be developed into 2.5 acre lots. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is required on developments exceeding 250 unattached units; therefore, this plat would not require an EAW. The city has not required discretionary EAWs. , J At this time, Chairperson Denn opened the public hearing. Jerry windschitl, Ashford Development Corporation stated that the reasons for the rezoning request are that it is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, it is consistent with the sewer plan and the property is bordered by R-4 zoning with sewer and water. Richard Fuller, 13948 prairie Road addressed staff's comments about EAWs. It's a great way to see to it that bodies like this never take a global view that you never study all of the environmental impacts that any given project might have. Mr. Fuller indicated that an EAW will never have to be done if the city continues to rezone and plat properties that are no more than 160 units at a time. He stated that this is a fine example of what is wrong with our planning; we allow it to be taken out a piece at a time and we never get around to looking at what the overall impact is going to b2. Mark Menth, 14122 prairie Read stated that his first home in Andover was on Hanson and Anaover Boulevards. At th~t time he was told it would be 8 to 10 years before development and they put in Old Colony Estates. when he purchased his present home he was told it would be 8 to 10 years before development or rezoning would take place. It is a year later and they are talking about rezoning. He felt that the city should re-evaluate the Comprehensive Plan as we are deteriorating the community by putting these developments in. He felt that the city should listen to the people who have lived here for a long time and not the people who are moving il~tO areas like Old Colony because they can purchase cheap lots. Mr. Menth stated that he is opposed to the rezoning. Regular Planning Commission Meeting September 14, 1993 - Minutes Page 8 (Rezoning, Cont.) Dave Carlberg took exception to the comments that the city doesn't plan. At the time Mr. Menth called him, 8-10 years before development was the truth. TKDA prepared a study for the city showing the properties that the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission said can be served by sanitary sewer and the number of gallons per day we can generate and the we can cover. Mr. carlberg took offense to the people saying that we don't plan, as that is his job and he feels we do a good job of it. Chairperson Dehn noted that the city has progressively tried to plan for population changes and it's very difficult for Dave to do his job to everyone's satisfaction. She also noted that the Commission is only an advisory board and the City Council makes the final decision. Those people here tonight are welcome to attend the City Council meeting to voice their opposition. Lynn Chaffee, 614 Andover Boulevard felt that the city is looking out more for people who are moving into Andover than those people who already live here. She \laS opposed to the fact that the parks are not improved so that the hundreds of children moving here have a place to play. Tom Chouinard, 14123 prairie Road doesn't mind development as long as it's two and a half acre lots. He moved out here for the peace and quiet. He felt that everyone on the Commission, except for maybe Bev Jovanovich, is for development. He would like to see the EAW done and asked why t~e Planning Commission is afraid to rquest it. Mr. Chouinard fucther stated that they all have horses and farms and questioned where they are going to take their horses once this property is developed. The City is going to force them out because they won't be able to pay the assessments when sewer and water come in. Jerry Windschitl noted that the parcel above his has requested sewer and water also and there is nothing he is doing to force sewer and water assessments on Mr. Chouinard or anyone else in the area. Carol Hofstad, 684 Andover Boulevard stated that her main concern 1S the ditches and where the water will end up. Ed Gritton, 14157 prairie Road explained that he has horses and is concerned with the liability if children from the nev de~elopments get onto his property and get injured by one of his hurses. He asked who the Planning Commission represents. Commissioner Apel noted that as a member of the Planning Commission all he can look ac is if the applicant meets the ordinances. He stated that he worked on the Comprehensive Plan and if he were to go back on this now, he would not be true to himself. Pat Schroeder, 720 Andover Boulevard asked if by allowing this to be rezoned now, will the wetland legislation going into effect in January apply. Mr. carlberg noted that the wetland legislation applies to plats, not rezonings. Ms. Schroeder asked that the Planning Commission deny the rezoning. Regular Planning Commission Meeting September 14, 1993 - Minutes Page 9 ) Dave Grorud, 14545 Palm Street N.W. asked why the Planning Commission feels compelled to make a decision on this now without a preliminary plat. He felt that the railroad tracks would be a natural barrier between the R-1 and R-4 districts. He also recommended that the rezoning be denied. Dave Erickson, 745 - 140th Lane N.W.-opposed to the rezoning. MOTION by Squires, seconded by Apel to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Squires stated that it would be nice to keep things the way they are but it is not reasonable. The city is doing its best to grow in an orderly fashion. Commissioner Putnam noted that if we didn't care, we would not be here. Commissioner Jovanovich said that she would vote to keep this property R-1. J Commissioner Peek stated that the driving force behind the Comprehensive Plan was not development only. The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan was to manage the growth in the most reasonable way possible. Chairperson Dehn noted that 8he will abstain from voting. She feels that the city should be planned in an organized manner. MOTION by Apel, seconded by Peek that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning request of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. to rezone property located in Sections 25 and 26 from R-1, single family rural to R-4, single family urban. Whereas the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 8, Section 5.03(B) and that there is no substantial negative effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands; there will be no negative effects on the values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the request is in compliance with Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02. A public hearing was held and there was much sincere well spoken and well documented opposition to said rezonina especially in regard to management of the wetlands. It would be advised, however, for the City Council and Planning and zoning Commission to review their previous policies and perhaps in light of the new legislation in the past year 1992, i.e., Tree Ordinance and water control legislation, to take a harder look at what we're doing in our planning and rezoning. ) Motion carried on a 4 yes (Peek, Putnam, Apel, Squires), 1 no (Jovanovich), 1 abstain (Dehn) vote. , This will go to the City Council on October 5, 1993. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA t-O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning David L. Carlberg City Planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA Discussion Items ITEM t-O. spec~al Use Perm~t "Steps of Success" Homes Group Foster Home 16676 Valley Drive NW BY: -3. '--=t> ~ REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and approve the Special Use Permit request of "Steps of Success" Homes (Kim and Dayton Jahn) to operate a group foster home for fourteen (14) girls, 12 to 17 years of age on the property located at 16676 valley Drive NW (Lot 2, Block 1, Echo Hill). Consult the attached staff report presented to the Planning and zoning Commission for background information on the request. Planning & zoning Review The Planning and zoning Commission, at their February 8, 1994 meeting made the recommendation to the City Council to approve the Special Use Permit with conditions as listed on the attached resolution. Attached are the minutes from that meeting. The Council should note the lengthy discussion of the request during the public hearing. Attached is a proposed resolution for Council review and adoption. Also attached are the documents submitted at the public hearing as a part of the public record. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA , J RES. NO. R -94 A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES, INC (DAYTON AND KIM JAHN) TO OPERATE A GROUP FOSTER HOME ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16676 VALLEY DRIVE NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 1, ECHO HILLS. WHEREAS, Steps of Success Homes, Inc. has requested a - Special Use Permit to operate a group foster home on the property located at 16676 Valley Drive NW, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Echo Hill; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was considerable opposition regarding said request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning & zoning Commission to allow Steps of Success Homes, Inc. to operate a group foster home on said property with the following conditions: 1. The Special Use permit be subject to a one (1) year sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D). 2. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual review and site inspection. 3. The home shall be limited to no more than Fourteen (14) adolescent girls per State licensing regulations. 4. The property shall be inspected by the City Fire Marshal and meet all applicable fire and life safety codes adopted by the City of Andover. 5. The property shall be inspected by the City Building Official and meet all applicable building and life safety codes adopted by the City of Andover. 6. On-site parking related to the operation be limited to four cars at anyone time. Page Two Resolution SUP - Steps of Success Homes, Inc. February 15, 1994 7. The revocation of the Special Use Permit at 4100 160th Lane NW be initiated. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 15th day of February, 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, Clty Clerk Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ~~~~ "\ Minute~ - Februl!ry 8, 1994 ~ Commissioners present: M~yn~rd Ape1, Becky Pe~se, 0a Ii ~ \ -f' ()"k Randy Peek, Jerry Putnem, J~y Squires Bev Jovanovich City Planner, David Carlberg Others i Commissioners l!bsent: Also present: PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES, FOSTER GROUP HOME - 16676 VALLEY DRIVE NW 7:30 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the Special Use Permit requested by Steps of Success Homes (Dayton and Kim Jahn) to operate a group foster home for 10 to 14 girls ages 12 to 18 years old at 16676 Valley Drive NW. He noted the applicable ordinances and the criteria for granting Special Use Permits. Staff has found the use would not have a detrimental effect to the occupants of surrounding lands. In fact, the use would provide a service to the City and Anoka County. Steps of Success Homes has been operating at 4100 l60th Lane NW for a number of years prior to receiving a Special Use Permit from the City in 1991, and is wanting to move to a new location. No complaints have been received regarding the operation and parking facilities. The Anoka County Assessor has indicated a group foster home should not depreciate adjacent property values unless the home becomes dilapidated; and the use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. J Staff did not receive any objections to the use upon the mailing 0: the public hearing to those residents within 350 feet of the property. Mr. Carlberg stated the City may start revocation procedures on the Permit at 4100 160th Lane NW, or the Permit becomes null and void if nothing is done for 12 months. He did not know the status of the Special Use Permit that was granted for a similar home for boys on Round Lake Boulevard, noting he will check into that. The Commission expressed concern about the condition 0: CoRd 58, as it is very narrow and hazardous. Mr. Carlberg $ta~ed he clid not contact the county and did not know if there are plans ~o upgrade that road. Kim Jahn, 4100 160th Lane NW, owner and operator of Steps of Success Homes - explained they must obtain a State license every year and are inspected annually. Everyone employed has to have a SeA check annually. They have been doing this for 12 years and have another group home in Grand Rapids, Minnesota, of eight girls which is run by her sister and husband. She and her husband live on site with their two children, ages 11 and 8; and they do not have rotating staff. It is a five-step behavior modification progra~ to help the girlS wi~h their problems. The residents are evaluated each month and scored on meeting certain criteria such as dependability, courtesy, eelf- control, respectful, good relationships, respectful of authority, achieve in school, etc.. T~e girls are from 12 to 17 years old. They cannot take IB-year-old girls unless they turn 18 while living there and they are allowed to stay unt~l they grad~ate. The girls they care for are truants, from abusive ho~es, runaways, shop lifters, neglected, etc. The goal is to get ~he girls back home if their home is a safe and healthy place to be, or with rela~ives or into fO$te~ homes in their community. The girls are allowed home visit weekends each month and day passes when parents pick them up and take them for , some activity. They have a real structured program are taught J independent living skills; some hBve jobs in ~he community. Ms. Jahn explained before they accept any resident, they do a thorough screening process of reviewing reports and interviewing the girls and their parents. Her children live ~n the house also, so she ~akes sure it is safe for them. The average length of stay is nine months to one year, though three girls have been with them fo~ four years because of their family situations. They are moving from a house of 2,800 square feet to 4,300 square fee~. There is a real need for this type of facilities and they have a waiting list. They have never had a complaint. She i6 well aware of the hazards of the road. Her children and residents were not allowed to walk on the road to Tom Thumb, only in the ditch. At this location, because there is no ditch, they simply will not be allowed on CoRd 58 because it is not safe. MS. Jahn went on that all resident5 hBve to remain in the mainstream school at Anoka Senior High or Sandburg Middle School. During the summer they go camping, go to Lake George, wave pool, and other activities families do. The residents are supervised 24 hours a day. She did not recall ever being called to the school that involved any of their residents. She read several letters from an Anoka Senior High counselor, from a licensed psychologist who work5 with their residents, social workers, probationary officers, etc. which indicated , there have been no problems with their residents. Those letters were ) given to the Commission to be entered into the record. Ms. Jahn reviewed the rooms on the various levels of the new house noting the State requires them to have a minimum of 60 square feet per resident. This house will meet the code. The City Fire Marshal has inspected the home. Traffic to the site includes the one staff member, plus the psychologist which comes once a week. Within a few days after a new resident is placed and then quarterly, there is a meeting with the parents and social worker or p~oba~ion officer. There is not a lot of traffic going in and out, maybe four cars at one ~ime. The home has a three-car garage, and there ~s a road th~t goes along side the house to an outbuilding in the back. Ms. Jahn stated the girls cannot be left unatte~ded. Whenever they are taken into the community, a Staff member must be with them. The only time they can be left unattended in the cOlnnunity is when they reach levelS and have shown stability and respor.sibility. However, most of the girls are returned back home at tha~ point. None of the residents will have automobiles. They have never had anyone run from the home. If they run away, it is usually fro~ school or on a home Visit, and that occurs rarely. When that happens, the Andover police must come to the house to ~ake a report; and ~hey have only been out once or twice a year. They have a security systen on the windows and doors. In the 12 years they have had residents, they have asked only two girls to be removed from the home because of incidents at school. If a girl is unwilling to coopera~e or show respect or maintair. themselves in the mainstream school, then he~ place is not the home for them. That is why they screen every girl. \ j MOTION by Pease, Seconded by ~ehn, to open the public hearing. Motion ~ carried on a 6-Ycs, l-Absent (Jovanovich) vote. 7:58 p.~. , Bcckv VQee. 16630 Valley Drive NW - lives adjacent to the proposed / site. She talked with neighbors in the area, and they do not want this facility. She thinks it will devalue her home and that she will have problems, since she already has had proble~s in the past with renters behind them letting her dog out during the day. She didn't think it is a good idea. She didn't think the~e will be enough people supervising the girls. MS. voss adamantly expressed opposition to the proposal stating she came to the area for the peace, quiet and the serenitr of the rural setting. She presented a petition to the Commiss~on of residents opposed to the group home at that location. The septic system is designed to handle only four bedrooms, and she felt it will have to be increased. The road is a dangerous road, and she didn't think the property could support that many people. Dallas Feleov, 16742 Valley Drive NW, livino iust north of the property in Quest~on - moved there in June because it was zoned single family residential. He spent a lot of money for the home and moved his family here because of the zoning. It is a beautiful place, and at one time he owned the lot Steps of Success plans wants to buy. He asked Ms. Jahn if they are a non-profit organization. Ms. Jahn - stated yes they are, Mr. Feleov - discussed with the county highway people repairing CORd 58 this summer the plans for upgrading the rest o~ the road. There is no plans in the immediate future for putting in walkways or bikeways, and he specifically asked that they do that for children to walk to catch the bus. There is virtually no shoulder there now. He also pointed out that the Staff report indicates Mr. Leone'6 comment that a group foster home should not depreciate adjacent property values. He says "should not" instead of "would not", which is nebulous language and does not give them a guaran~ee. He asked the Commissioners to look at their own minds and consc~ous as to whethe~ this home would honestly not depreciate the value of their homes if it was next door to them. At the present location Staff noted they did not receive objections to the group foster home on the mailing of public hearing notices to those residents within 350 feet of the property. Obviously the people there are very happy with this home; but the people in the area they are proposing to locate are not happy. Declan O'Brien, 3992 165th ~venue NW - just pu~chased and developed ~is property. His concern is the transportatio~ p~oblems, day passes, and lack of public transportation, He felt as neig~bors they have a right to screen as well, and they choose not to have this use in their neighborhood. Carroll Feleqv, 16742 valley Drive NW - has done a lot of thinking about this. They are living in high-b~ck houses. They lived in t~eir other house for 19 years, then moved ~o this high-bucks neighborhood because they had saved for it for so long. She has done a lot of soul-searching on ~hisi and if scmeo~e to:d her there was a group home next door when they looked ~he home, she would not have bought i~. In a high turn-over area with affordable homes, i~ would be easier to sell. But the more expensive homes in ~heir neighborhood cannot be sold as eaSily. She felt everything she has worked for is on the line, and she has a real problem with this, 3 J Bud Holst. 4276 165th Avenue NW - has the same thoughts as the previous people. He challenged tr.e one-sentence statement of Staff that the use would not h~ve a detrimen~al effect on the surrounding occupants. The statement that the use would provide a service to the City was not expounded upon, questioning how the City is served at this point. It would provide a service to Anoka County, but he didn't see that it is their responsibili~y as neighbors to provide a service to either the City or the county in this type of oneratior.. He didn'~ mean to imply anything derogatory about the operators of the business or the girls who are there, as that facility is needed. But he argued there is zoning for that type of facility. He poin~ed out one of the requirements i5 to meet ~ Class 10 :ood establishnent and a Class 3 lodging establishment, and any other business that meets those requirements has to be zoned for hotel or restaurant. Mr. Holst agreed that traffic is of supreme concern. Fourteen adolescen~ girls with either some type of disfunction in their current family situation have been known to attract 13 to 14 adolescen~ boys with cars in similar situations. He thought the traffic consideration alone would be something to disqualify this request. Finally, the Staff report says they did not receive objections upon mailing the public hearing notices. It doesn't specify whether it is 350 feet of the old property or the new. One of the things that should be part of the public record is what the neighbors at the old location have to say. The 350 feet may be the ordinance, but it seems too short of a distance. This is basically a half-way house. A friend of his built a similar building in Blaine; and as the neighbors found out what it was, they began putting their ho~ses up for sale. He didn't see Mr. Leone guaranteeing to purchase their properties at the pre-appraised value. I Mr. Carlberg indicated the S~aff report includes a notice of the public hearing and the names of those within 350 feet of the new location who were notified, ~ha~ distance required by State law. The report does not address the feelings of the people at ~he current site of 4100 l60th Lane NW. J Marvin Christenson. 4065 165th - is not within 350 feet but does live in the neighborhood, and this concerns him a great deal. He went into considerable detail of hie review of the Zoning Ordinance with rege=d to the definitions of the R-1 zone, permitted uses, family, and rest homes. He argued that g=oup home does not fit the definition of a res~ home nor that of a family because ~here will be more than five persons living in the house that are not related. It was his opinion the use more correctly falls u~der the boarding house and/or hotel Special Use Permit, neither of which a=e allowed in the R-l zone. This is a home for 13 girls between 12 and 18 years old who may be visited by on a recurring basis by 10 to 30 friends, male and fe~ale; 10 to 30 family members; federal, sta~e and local government officials; maintenance and delivery persons; S~epB of Success management personnel; and others. He couldn't imagine how the activities could be judged not to have a detrimental effect upon the occupan~s of the surrounding land. ~hose coming in and out will most likely use an automobile. Traffic conditions and parking facilities at the~r current location and absence of complaints regarding the parking facility do not apply to ~his new location because the circumstances specific to the new location are the factors to co~sider. Mr. C~ristenson stated the distance between homes on Valley D=ive is less ~han one would expect in an R-l zone. Space and parking is limited by woods and the absence ~ / of shoulders on Valley Drive. The county's assessor's view on the impact on adjacent property is probably correct from an aasessor's point of view; however, from a homeowner's perspective, it is not relevant. The homeowner is interested in the impact on the selling price. He did not see any circumstances that would make this intended use suitable to that location. The request for the Special Use Permit should be denied so the residential atmosphere of ~he R-l zone will be upheld because the occupants will not be family as defir.ed in Ordinance 6 and the City has not adopted an ordinance defining and governing group foster homes. Mr. Christenson submitted his notes to the Commission to be entered into the o:ficial record. Rav French, 16532 Valley Drive NW, Lot 4 - doesn't object ~o having a home tor girls and Ms. Jahn has his respect, but this is not the neighborhood for it. They all moved out there to have peace and quiet, and he thinks they deserve it. To the west of them is a multi- family dwelling with teenagers. Three or four times a year they have unsupervised illegal parties that go on until 3 a.m. There are times he can't sleep at night because of the loud music, racing cars on the dirt, etc. Another objection is the road is not good for any foot traffic whatsoever. Because of the large amount of wetland on the property, it will not handle the septic system for up to 20 people. He noted the petition speaks for all of them in the neighborhood as something that is not good for them. Dan Voss, 16630 Va11ev Drive NW - looked at over 200 different lots in Andover and the surrounding cities before he found hie lot, then took seven months off from his own business to build his house. They moved out here because they didn't like to have neighbors very close to them, for a more rural setting and for the quiet. They gave up the quiet with the construction of the Fire Station, which he understands is good for the whole City. He doesn't want to take anything away from the home itself, but they are looking to protect the reasons they moved to the rural area. If they wanted to live next door to 15 to 18 people, they would live next to town homes. Diane Smith, reaLtQr for the cast 13 years - sold the Jahn's their first home in 1988. She is now selling their home on 150th Lane and purchasing this one on valley Drive. The house in :60th Lane was on the market for two weeks, and the property increased in value by S20,OOO. She has worked wi~h a number of prope=ties, and none of them have been in as nice a condition any time she walked into the present home every year for the last five years. That house is closer in proximity to its neighbors, it being 2.5 acres in size on a residential road, than the one on Valley Drive which is five acres. She recognized people move to the country for different reasons, but the reality is there i9 not one farmer who will sell his land as a farm. They will sell to a developer, and those in the rural areas will see more neighbors. There ~~e ~a~y county roads in t~e same condition as this one, Taxes are paid to improve them but they car.not be improved fast enough because there are too many people moving to the country. This is ~he or.ly 9ro~p home ir. Andover, and she finds ~t sad that there is so much concern. T~ere are so many children who need a home like this. She suggested ~he residents go through their program, as she would be proud to recorr~end it ~o anyone who needs it. :here has to be someone like the Jahn's ~n the cor.~unity who would do this. They have looked at many houses, and this is the only one that would accommodate the girls in a life style ~hat the Jahn's would like --" ,; to have for the girls and for themselves. " Bob Johnson, 4224 165th Avenue NW - stated if the City keep8 changing / the zones and keep giving permits, it will no longer be the R-1 zone. If 6 building is needed for this, go where it is zoned for it, not into a residential area. R~bert He1iker, 16804 Valley Drive NW - sold this property to start w~th. There is a lot of low land on that lot, expressing concern with the septic system. He doubted the septic system designed for five people will handle up to 14 people. Then the sewage will go into the low land which has a very rich wildlife. He did not want to aee that happen. Mark Law, 4075 165th Avenue NW - noted there was a group home for boys a block away from where he worked in Golden Valley. They did a lot of running around and chasing, and there were problems. Mr. Holst - asked what size ie the septic system. At least one-third of the property is low where a drain field cannot be placed. Ms. Jahn - submitted plans to the County Health Department. They will have to inspect it and accommodations will be made to meet the standard requirements. Mr. Carlberg stated a provision in the resolution requires the Building Official to do an inspection. It will have to meet the City, county and State codes. Any developable property needs at least 39,000 square feet to accommodate at least two or three additional locations for septic systems. The Building . / Department will do the inspection and approve it when it meeds code. Dale? - did the soil borings, perk tests and sewage system design for the specific lot in question. As beet as he can recall, it was designed tor a tour-bedroom house which is a maximum ot eight occupants with a 1250-gallon 6ep~ic tank. Because of Boil mottling and high water table, any additional inc=ease to that sewage system would require some kind of lift station to pump to higher ground to a distribution system. Char1ette O'Brien. 3992 165th Ave~ue W~ - moved here October 1. Vandals carne to the house and destroyed the electrical before they moved into this house. It took the police officer 40 minutes to come out. The Deputy stated Andover is a very high crime area with teenagers. There is only one police officer on the 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. shift. Bringing in additional kids brings in proble~s. Property values of her relatives decreased when a group home was built in the neighborhood. They moved out here to retire. She also noted that the papers giving good recommendations are meaningless, citing an incident of being fired shortly after being given a good recommendation by her superiors. There are 14 women, which brings thousands of dollars per child to the Jahn's. If there is one permit to do this, what keeps her from doing the same thing to be able to pay for her house in a very short time? Andover is the talk of the area, considered the Edina 0: the North because of ~he beautiful surroundings and abundant wildlife; a~d that is what they are paying for. She is very opposed to this. Mr. Voss - asked if the property will be ~axed as ho~e5~ead or non- homestead, as he is not using his house as a business use. Commissioner Apel sta~ed it would be taxed as residential because they (;:, I are living in the house. Ms. Jahn - stated they pay more taxee. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Pease, to close the public hearing. *otion carried on a 5-Yes, l-Absent (Jovanovich) vote. 8:38 p.m. Commissioner Peek noted Phyllis Lew called to express opposition to the proposal. Chairperson Dehn stated she received about five calls, all expressing opposition. Commissioner Pease stated she too received calls. The Commission recessed at this time, 8:40i reconvened at 8:47 p.m. Ms. Jahn - answered several questions raised by the Commissioners. She explained the State requirements is to have not more than four residents per room occupied at anyone time. In a multi-use room, it is 50 square feet per resident. They hired an architect to review the plan to meet fire codes and space. They are under the Department of Corrections licensed by the State. When the number of residents increase, the code requires, unless waived by the local Fire Marshal, some one must be awake in the home at all times. In this type of facility, a mom-pop operation without rotating staff, and because of the close proximity of the Fire Station, Andover's Fire Marshal did not see a problem with waiving that requirement. visitors for the girls do not stay there. Family members pick them up and either take / them home or out for some activity. The only time when people would be there for an hour to an hour and a half is during staff meetings with the parents and the worker. There would be no friends or boyfriends there. They are very structured. She will not le~ a girl date unless she has parental approval. For liability purposes, ~he worker, place and county sign to not hold her responsible while the girl is out on a date, the job, etc. She feels ultimately responsible for the decisions because they are someone else's children. There is no one who dates now. The traffic, the coming and going, is no more than average. Commissioner Apel was a party to the Special Use Permit p=ocess for 4100 160th Lane NW, and he recalled they did not have the vociferous neighborhood opposition to the group home. There was opposition, but most questions where answered when they found that the home had been in operation for several years and they were unaware of it. He eould not support the issuance of a Special use Permit for this activity, feeling the City has to be more sensitive to the neighborhoods. Special Use Permits were largely designed to allow neighborhood input, otherwise the City could just zone it. This might be a nice location and the house a proper size, but all this is doing is allowing the Jahn's to increase the nu~~er of children they have. Commissioner Apel did not want to be a part to improving the Jann's situation at the expense of lessening the way the neighbors enjoy their properties. The trade off, to him, isn't worth it. ne would support looking for another location in which to expand this use. Ms. Jahn - stated it is to improve their family situation as well. She also noted that many of the names on the pe~ition are no~ within 350 feet of the property. Corr~issioner Apel was opposed to limiting the area of notification, feeling all interested parties should be ~ notified. Commissioner Peek noted the previous Permit occurred after the use was I in operation for a period of time. Ms. Jahn - stated they have been in operation at that site since 1988, but they did have a letter from the City of Andove= saying twelve girls were allowed at that time. Mr. Carlberg stated some of the residents didn't know the use existed at its current location until they received the public hearing notice for the Special use permit. That is a 2.5-acre site on a City street with no trees. This is a different atmosphere. Traffic, concerns about counseling and monitorinq were issues at that time. Several residents were in favor because the Jahn's were in the neighborhood during the day to watch it. He talked to several Deputies in the last week, and they have not had a problem with the home; they have a very good reputation and Staff took that into consideration. If it becomes a problem, there is a procedure to revoke the Permit. Staff monitors the Permit annually. Commissioner Pease asked how the property values of the existinq house and surrounding area have been affected by this use. MS. Smith - stated there has been no decrease in property values either of the site itself or of surrounding properties. The property itself i8 probably in twice as good condition as when it was purchased in 198B by the Jahn's. The septic eystem would have to be approved. In their current location, the Jahn's have the septic system pumped on a regular basis, every two months. Mr. Carlberg stated the J Metropolitan Council is requiring the City to implement bi-annual inspections of all on-site septic systems by a certified inspector to be sure it is not failing. Commissioner Dehn asked about foot traffic along the road, as her major concern is the safety along the road. She was very concerned with the hazardous condition of the road and lack of shoulders on i~ if young people are on the road. Ms. Jahn - stated she has two children, and they won't be able to walk or bike on CoRd 58. Nor will the residents. They do not allow it where they live now, and she will not allow it from this location. Commissioner Peek felt this is a totally appropriate use for this site. He was saddened by the attitude that if they spend a certain amount or have a higher-priced home that potentially they can segregate housing in the neighborhood. This is allowed by a Special Use permit, and the mechanism to police the use and make sure it is appropriate is the neighbors can file complaints with the City if the use is not holding up their end of the bargain. He felt Steps of Success Homes has demonstrated it is a well-run situation. Conditions can be added to address parking, the septic system, etc. Traditionally these types of situations are located in residential areas because that is where they are the most successful. ) Commissioner Putnam agreed that the use is fitting for the area. A residential area where the girls can see how families act and react and i6 the type of situation they need to be in. The home has obviously done a good job in the past, and he didn't see it being any different than if someone moved into the house who had 14 children of ~ their own. The Jahn's have shown they can manage children and can do it very well. There are safeguards built in by the State and under \ the Special Use Permit that would oversee those conditions of the j road, the septic system, etc. He is in favor of the request. Choirperson Squires agreed. He understood the concerns of the people who live in the neighborhood; but on the other hand, he thought it is somewhat stretching it, if not cruel, to think that these people who need some assistance should be stuck between a restaurant and an office building. This is a substitute home for them for a temporary period of time. There are some mechanisms through the Special Use Permit process for the City to monitor the operation to make sure that it is consistent with the residential environment. If it isn't, those problems will be addressed. He had no problem with it being consistent with this 2one. It is a single family residence as these people are living there not only as a family but for the girls who are there for a short period ot time to get their lives back on track. Commissioner Pease received a couple phone calls about this and understood their concerns. But she is equally concerned about providing an atmosphere for children to change. This does meet the requirement of a rest home; these are children. They are children who need some support and help from the community. She felt the City has the mechanisms to monitor any problems they may have. There is an annual review, and they can be shut down at any time if there is a problem. The traffic isn't any different than for anyone else. The girls do not have cars, and they are very restricted and disciplined. She felt there is more discipline and supervision with these girls J than for most other children because the program is to modify their behavior and help them to become productive adults. The septic system concerns will be taken care of by the Building Department. She was not sure that property values do 90 down, but it is more fear because it is under the control of the Department of Corrections. These are high-functioning girls in these homes. She can't, in good conscience, find a reason with all the safeguards to recommend denial. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Pease, to recommend that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the enclosed Resolution with the following changes: The fourth paragraph -- WHEREAS, the public hearing was held and there was considerable opposition regarding said request. Condition No. 3 changing the limit to no more than 14 adolescent girls. Condition No. 4, change to "The property shall be inspected by the City Fire Marshal and meet all applicable fire and life ~afe~y codes adopted by the City of Andover." Condition No.5, "The proper~y shall be inspected by the City Building Official and meet all applicable building and life safety codes adopted by the City of Andover." Add Condition No.6, that on-site parking be limited to four car a at anyone time. Add Condition No. 7 that revocation of the Special Use permit at 4100 160th Lane NW be initiated. DISCUSSION: Commissioner Apel questioned Condition 6, asking what happens when there is a gradu~ti?n party., Ms. Jahn - stated they personally own fo~r cars. Comm~ss~oner ?ee~ stated this would be exclusive 0: what is in the garage. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Squires, Pease, Peek, Putnam; NO-Apel, Dehn; ABSENT-JOvanovich. Motion carried. The item will be heard by the City Council on February 15, 1994. 9:16 p.m. / 9 / , /1' /.1 ,j t I" ~"1 ,C /1 i. . Ii t. ,I I:' I l _ '''''' .' , i . I! I . , ,~,' , " , , i / , 'co l\ }" \":'::'C ,J 1,1 " I' ~ . - ,p, '. L L'!---:"-Ji I';\.\ f~~ . ..... - ......- .- :-" f:''1-\ I.~ , I.t-_.. ,iCI.~ :'~...- \'/'~L..~L:_~"-! I",' .\' I, ... .. -.. -', J~t'l2L~ '- /'~"') .. .-. CI i ~,-~L") , <-c-1f{ c F:t:'--':' " ~ ~'(' ~' L'; ,> C;l~.~,.~ I' H:~,;'1 ',.( :.~ 1,--: lr-........ L.t,.> V C') f f~ c.. I ~ , ~ - , ,,) I L... 1<(. \' ( t, r;L I' - ~\' . ", ' .'\.. I" I , ,. t: v ~ 'v -VII ,'\ '- i- I' \ l~ I~."'i",, I 'c \,: , t- \.- I- (; ,- \ ,I ' ~ :).u_ Vp,{ TL' 'if'c " , ,\ 'vI.. .':~ ~ ~'J, . ~ \ \ \. ',' , :\:"...-;\'':: . ".- ...... " ."' !;i'I'U:- ,", \ ", J ;. ';: H.- (. :-::.,..: \. .....l-Lt--...j f':'~~~ l"~ :J._' /C'>S .). L/cc-U t' ~ n? 7" /!.. -:---"{2 A~') J....) _. / '----" u- . "h~ . 7~ -,~ '7 7 - /G.~~5'~- ..:-~_,._~_ ,.: ~_i I .' { \ 1 , :,,'l=-~'__ ~__~ - ~./ \ 'I _~. .,~ ~-~~: /;.. I, - ""'f '. ""Ll\.. (, 'f tll:~---,,-~-... t, ;.; ~-..." f.~~. ...-:,.,,-:- __/,' ,J...." i (. , .' .J L-! "; ~ ~:'=-JL~o4o-r..~_Ji.\.._:;'._,-~:-~_:i...~_~~____________________ () / / :1 I ~ </7//7,/",//[/ ~/ q 0") ~ /& r-f'f( AI/~ JUt.) ~~~ c: af~ -f&zs- ICS-;/ ?~. ).z-w " 'rrrC9- ~ ~c.;z. /"Y~~j'l~ - _ ~~ - fIG ~<(..;I. hL:'?J. _)V,, \ ~~~~~~:~~~~2~')p.w~.n_- ."-_.. ~ . \ '. ~~ <>t- ~ o~ ~~qa \(o$" Clu r-J.W. (A~ CYYK~ ~3~~ l~73' J~ Dr- ~*'~~ /M"oo t/~j}",- . t'O ~ /(,fNl (Ai-lit>--<; f) I? 5'~ttt,~0-/~~/ rte~<re~ItC-~~t<( r: L I -I (.Jtl ( i /.{, t- /, j[,s i: 1 (/ A L-I-(::' j j]" t1.~ 1.' II-.- 1./_ I'll y- i c...1 ,-/"'-It'J--A{ , 1."- I, "- - ,. - . I Ilt// /~~/ /?flf~f /.~! _,I ,/ ..{j ~ ,- /' {')'" _." /~ (7 /&.,4 .' / L' 0.'/' , -; . /' {,/[ /. <:..' , Vile C-[~-fL(Tr~(L-L 'I I"""""il/'-/ SfCfl fIt 'J ;( / {,::'!j,',. {'('7~,,' (r;;:"':I Or-:C.u :SS'('YI L t.J~\.. ~~ _/' J f _" ~ , <~. I }\r 5Tee) j.;:'/( ('.--,,'-.. ~ I " v i 1/ ~ ",,~' '-'., \ ", ". . ,1", i t/./ , v"-' "--'--'ck ' ~- 'l'! . -... 1/,,\ '. ~ ~ ~ ' . / ~ :',f.i-\....,. (J;'-.10j) (,/ !:t~0 . . / ( , . /1;[" II..: .......... ~. - / -- , I-~. !-) . , I ,,' I "'~ -j -i Lf- I I~;L Trrc e.:" , (" L ;z', " ~'-' _ L _ ~ ~ ti." ~;..'" ""~ " \J )':; ,. "" . . './ )0, .;~I .J.' ,-,!I} ,~ ~ ... ~ .\.; 1\." /. fJ ,,?f\~ '-l ) ZO/fJ €. D ;2-1 :J/// ~ L-<;:' //'..:,y:, //'//;=///- of j?-! "Z'c//s . , . , . ~ /' l '-7 ,t;: ""f' ~ f/ L / ~ 10 PI;':) V. :J",z... -""':= - ~": "'''. 1'-,--__ J,-",,,--,,,/ /.." // ,.; ,~/.-;r- ., ...:.') ~~.:; /~ := ,'~. .'_. /. , I' . '.<tI' -'.~...-,. ,,- __ F- ~ // " . ~ __ /-};. /)/...:-;. ,C "_./ -. - --." - -, - ' 1/-'1......:..:. :~'.'" /.~ __ ._~,. ./..:.... /-; ./"'1'.;: '-.,.~./"'!.. _'" - I - ~ .' . ~!."":"'I;;: , , /,..- '-. ~ ...... :::-/ . . /' ;.... I ..' ,~, _,'. -.. - .... . ........ - - .- I--'Y ~,.rl, i i t=. ~ (A.$'~- .- -'-.-----...-.--......_,.a.. -" /~"'-~;.,I ! .' ',' .-;;. - . ....- - ,...., ,:-. , -~" -- /-1')1" i . . '___ . ~.;_::..'.:J / . J {~:.. '? : I _~ ~-:,.~- /~- / . :; j/:;- jJ l .-;:. ~~h;)1 (<-I -r)/'/ )/'./;),/.'i;)tA/-:...... (:1.2' 1"~t.''7 ..../? '/7.:;J(<:;.C I ...... ,,--,. -'-- -W'_. ...,. _ ?~;?:5'2t-)S' R~ (tt Lf::!:L_ L'f S(Jy.?. /I'I}-^:;.2IIJr'),L. Ole - .- ..,.-......-.-- _. ,- ..'-' " .....-- . . II- -,./~., .1,., ~, 1. I 'I {. ." .t. j'.c.":J,., .:::"' t,<.;: />~. ./:(~: ,i..J :'~;.~;,.. >':: .-.' , '-4t~..~....: ~' .../;' _/ ... - .." '~ .,;r "-' . ~. ..~,' i"/' . = . f ( . ......10-, //...',.A.......~J._7" _'-J-",~;.:.:.I.lJ rr-{ :t:~ '....L-i:),.:_.."" 1_, 1 . L . ,{, - .... / !J. !-~ G_ f.,j .~.... '.' ,.-C!:.E::i' ~ /./ ~_. .,v-;~.: rr" ~,r;'" j..;; A1 ~ -J ~ L.:) - .,- . 1 ~.J - ~ '. b~"'. /-""".", /'-}--:' ,..," .':"'~ :l~:' ... .... .''- 0 r:;) ,;,r-t..t'f Q"':: f-'~ ~r!" ~."'':'; .:.:.. 't l....,..,~.:......./ ,...f.~''-('" -{'- ',*........., ,.;:. ,I r'.f ' .' ..1 '-L- .-'1;- .. .... _~., ,,1 ./l ~ ./0 _ .. /:0:0.:;;; n v{'j /. t ,~/ I {J '-4 n:.; '01::- i . ::::-- f': /1 .,:,;. If \..di"A.-;7 /:::.... . t:h~t S E k..' c:e. .D .'(/.~ tJ /./ I': //'/ ?l ])~()::c. (( I/c)r;; ::. (Ii// i: J' . t: j c. i ~(... .is- () F tt S. t,{ /J ( sF R J / ~- /'//~. ..;<:::;eo:r./n;'jc'"L IJC. S "bE.+:uJE...s A- gE..";;,/ iicM1- A--~ ft 1'12:,j/\-Nc- H-om~ fot2-. ~~ ~f of ckl.l<1t2-.:t:/J o~ 1-{;.!.. t1-Cru vF jiV+l(lM c~ "P~fKE of RE..~r,1=ot2.1-f"os't 'S\A.r-fE'~~Nc.. t:>od\..1 cL!~Ot'd~i J C-A-tJ 'T ~ I?-c. f\ )f", ~ 't f)~. '1. ~. I... !....: . ':)f' r+ '6 (~" tA.. ',':'; -. t , \ ~jF:= /j: I c~.,,: e '': Co (212.:~Lnf-J!tic, ~ Th l S d. ~FII/I'hO'/'J 0 F ., I f'! A \c ~ ';;;, T ',\~b ('(~ r::. 1~~ t (2... .~~, ~~ h E.lJ~e Co 'j L=:;.;) ~ 1... \ . - l::J-- f 0..;..... .t....:. -' 4 I "\ L C/j-~ WON I I I--=-' .,-,.... I I ,^,':-. ~ I'J ;'.} [~~!,"'.', 0 ",j.. .1 I"" .;~ l S M '~~ (11V S. 'j.,,\ (it I,V':- I:f.,~ .'$IJ(-'-":;:- t~\{.JC.t::' o'(~~.e. -i-~l't-f) ,..; .: A- t-€-(2.. -rt'\ So o-F Orzeiil'-i (-tfJC- s,. I~:O. S ~^ {2... r\ -:. 7:;>~ ,\ ~.l 'I C ~ "'::J~ \('- -:- \ -' -" f l...... c.... \J'\. -Oil - \...,., . j ; , ]So fh26 ; tJ c~ ~ i;t:S ~ (f co 'n~..' iJ':' <;) ~ j- t: O~;_L/ Jf:'" .~'iCC-l Botl~ ; r/ G, ~A S €.. - A "E '^- '_ Ld I i1 ':, 'Jtf-.-'!. ~ ~ A-rJ f1. m o'/-I=:: L Of H-~ h: .... vJ hS {2.':: J +0 12.. C-O rr: :-~/J ~ ~f-!'J /..1 J'tN cd b i I '1'T1-l ~ 11./ c, {I to ,-...0{ e ~ ~ 'f l'i-o ("0") E- ~'E.. e~Oi"C~SI \ aE s C {2.~\~ ~ S t1- ~(..I ~ ~.. frrvd/!; J~_~__~-, ""P(2? nr;/':'(/I~~fY',:/.I'- F:j!:. :;;2.F.,)//E ?Fi=', "'}_ i...~, .: JlI;'.:.; 11 f. ~ ?(f)) j ~.:r' \~; f2 ::, (2 c=. ..: : -3 .'" ;' (' t'. ~. , I ! ,'_ I. ~ - .~ /::" (; - r' --r' . I~ J: .' -~ ,j' , - '. - ,.: ....)) ,- -r.., ;-..,t ::- - ., ,f! ~ . . , ~ - .. I ," -A b '.A..l',.1 ... -' ~ ",v (, ~ .t !-.. - ! f'~ J " I' ~. r:,.,. '",:,J H-.~: ~_.... r=. . t. -~) .' ( . , - r: I,': i f'- , - I .: L' ,"\i . '-~ 0) '., (' {; , . . '. ., 'S ;Y;-:t.~ ..// if~: /'i"(" J . ( , ; I wd-L, () i2 vJ) t f,., 0 u..(- if' :-.::, .,oJ;' . j .- ". "..., 1.. .) " f '_' ." _._ '. J , '. . -' :: ! 'h 3 ~;2. (() c (2- '! l!'l " - ~. ',i-- ~ .aIA :- ~ -. ,oj,;" \ t ~~. e Ail. ~ A-\...-lo IJJ E ~ /Il) 'f{s. (2 -j 2..CN'::' - B j'I-t., l!-rL'Z.. r~~ ('/'\ ':" 7" E::.:. i) S~_ .: If} ~ ~ c:, E Ii E t2- f\ ,'- ~ 'J\. ~ If J-:;:'::' -.::::;;, s?-e: · W h 'A'ie(),~~ 'i, 1-5 1; W'"i,UI;:j ~ \,)./.);, J S ::. {1.L(~o' .' -;- J '$. "Pt2cpcs; ~ A- ~fY'\~ 8g 11)-1~ i;,trZLs ) I ~.13 ~slteS' of N'C':: wh.c {Y)ft.(,1 -bt: VI:5/1-EJ oJJ f'r (2s.~.(2(2/IUc, -bft-si:: ~-( )0""0: f'~~S()d~ (mt1l-!. ihVd'~c:n{H"Z..)) /0""'" 3cF=A-r'Yl ;.L7 ('('~":.'rY", ~~,e..;-" f.Ed."E f2nL J s1'f-rtE (t-t-/d La{!/"i-c c'C'J"EP/,j /i"'~,~__r ::) i he; (' (7) m-A1f)1e,Jft1vc.E... A'I d '"i)S.LJS,41 "? s-~~ c tJ :; / "5't€.p.s a F 5' iA.(~t '2.-5 ~ In f).-rll1-C!J'?- t('~ t/.. ?~ (1::/)//."'.- -: ~ ;17v'd 07;4'9-I!!:':S. :r: C A-,j I T 1m f1~{t'.Is. ~~ w 'te...E. Hc:iw, f., <2,':' OJ tl-u/2(2 ,.,j:; ,it. 'f~15 Lcc-t<'t-:hc/.... ~17--r.J L Z-j....( d,;; ~ t,:... IJ-:-,f /7~_/~ , '"r-: .<-1/~ J .t..C ~ ,~ '--'.."' ; ," : 1/" ... I"'~ v\....- -.- .." Vi<....-..." ...- _ ,,, ...,. .". - \ ' , '-L" - ..r-. .. - J N "')~.; {f.., a': '2;:1 "r+ l. "t:-- ri 1= t!.:7 J . / J o -F -S ....t.i2;2.c ,,1...1.1 d. t/~ C"~-I' '1'S" ~......o.o L~ C::. 0 ItJ ~ "+0 rW d F (lo /h '-ti.. I ~ ,L"Cl--n-'t; ()~.1 WI lC . I . .(Y\O~ j }-. \ iC-t.~1 ~~s IHJ ~ '{':;7 ('r"L L.l'~ ,( ~ ~~ OvC ~ ,'-<--s GI ,st-^-dSNJ:.~.I1 'TI2AFF'. 2.. CcN'd.i-'hCIJ~ /r1-.Id ?11~}~I/./'" "'A l l - - ^ ~ LlI I ; .' ^. - ,/ I -- 1- I~-'" I.. n ';:";;;' rr-I 7 00 10C j::.-. ....,Tt)':... }J. /,v C!,J N C I II pr i., 't-o I ~ ~ 7 ~ V A-li.,t '1' b (2.\.v':"" N, vJ. IJ 0,2 uo~s :f~~ li-~ 5 ~()C.S '.~ F Co M {::'l-1~:,.jI~ ~'E. c~/'t-f!-ci,/I; 0 ?'~;:"f] ho,,- fu' d 'K.. -:... '? f'f'cl ;<. {/F~ F Ac. J - ~ l. '2...s. /Ft '-/to 0 J ~ ui'::' 1-;: I j -~ t'/ . t:...:.. 0.. q2. '~\A (i' '5 t (.. f j!' c. '";' 5?~ c,- f- c. {-:; 110 \1 i ~ J {\ LL~ ~1 -.: \~ j -=- N, v..J. A-~ ~ 'f,l\ ~ r r1 c.. {..., 12.~ h ':2Q;J"3 I :; -: If ' .I " t~t \~la7~ "f,~\~"( 1)(2, )":.... -.t-t...'= '.oJ ...,'::'0" - 'b.:~ \'...<Ft::.7...' {\ d ) /~ ~ ~ r f; \+~H("" r:. ~ \ S ,--=-...:- _. / ~i f: t') 0 I j =- V) c] ,{ ! .~ "' i( ',l :-.... . ( /1) /1 tJ I':.' I'J ll. (11 It E ,~:i t:. ...... i 'r-'~~ l\'~ ~ h (j A l..., -;;; J ~ ,~) ',) ,\ L l 1 l -i; (~, ) '7:. l-t;-.. ~ ~ tA. tl1"/ A..j. ~ E.. c..~'::J)~''; J I? /,/) :J F ~ =- \ /'f\:rti-r:.-.t- c F 'tt, \~ ~ ?~ ~ ; ,; C.. t..-l ~ -:_ '~fJ ....t-t'" ~ r1 ,..j.j (,,~ 2'1) i "p (:...; .:::=.:: Jf\L..l~.-~ IS '?(;~'Vr:Li'7 ?oPf.--;~/I-.P-"fV' Ii,') Its;.?:..);;- "")"j-' .....1":" ').-'~,J. I'.,' 'J'~.J;,'; r-{'?Af"" ,j \..J.... - '''''''1'''-.'/:''_ \ ,~i r' ! _ .. ' * .... .... ~..- .. r I -".~ I I J ~'J r'" ~, _ \#'V . '? ~ I? 'j / -'~C r J ~f- ~.....!.. t\..-; :. ~ ;::s.;; f2 0; V j ~_v i;' llJ.j l <:: t:-; ~.. .....;.. - >\. I /- ~ J......I r:'''' - l... I} . (,L S ..... ,..."-'-. . r", ":,... I , ~ (('I ~ -.JAI r, '. ".. , Sit I~'{t: :.-.; " '~C' ;iV .~ /~ 2.. 1fY\;; n,...:{ !') L) $t,.U_JtJ (j "P(21 ~~_ t-~ (~'IJ ') tl : A-'~~ ~ 5\S'~-J \1 f': l ~.;\. ~ I ,..) 'Il.~ l'~ ')l ~ '.It, (~ {, -; 'v -C. ~ (2.,t-r; i i) . l.l 5 S":, .,\1 ~ ...l_.~_ a ~.,..rU2.l\'L.( 7 IJ of- "5"",- do t !7 /1'/ tJ '"PM tic.. A { (, I:~ -z.c t-.) ) tJ c..., 'b I ~ lYe, ~(-l f n () '7 ' !,r{. II d ;-'/.: .~.) (.,,:. 0! (2. ~rrl ~ li-: r/ ,.!.2.:: 'b~:.,... ~."A. \ (1) C l ,r.- I i.,!.J i' ..~ ;",' -=' L '" () 1 J " .'. /' -. e~ '. I- f1 "' - ~ 1 1" ( '( ~ r: ;) ~c..' L.t /' .(,l,~. (; I '-, n ) r (~ ::... oJ yc. I '.. / ,I' .J I.... .".~c ; ( i-..... ',; - .. '- ~r-~ r2 i'/' r ('(', (\"1 L.. t ~ /2';0 /f'd I W h frt ,'11~. t.=:..# '1- .. f )( \ ':. f\ tJ ':J ;~- i ~ ,~u (,1 ::.hi (J!~ '? '~ 'I-~ n f rr'r{~ r- -:~ ..t-e.. ':. ..... ""!! --: .."... '. J"I .- 1-') (2. ..... ^ -' y f ) Ie.. ,~~ i I ~_~~. . f\. - -;... ..:; t-- ~ , -- A I... .~ ~ / f' I 1 .l. ...,) ._' "/'. . I ....... , VV ,.,l'-'l "J ~ rl/v::) i ~.::. ~~ ~ t.- . IN '/f=d.j ~J i i : l~:.. :' -- i A ."" ~ v\..,.;, '_' .- ~ ..l , - ..J. ..j J /J'j t :i t:, !. ^ ./- .. '-".'-1 .. . ....~ .- ~ " .. ~ i I ~j t.... It- , ... ,..\- -d l:~:.. 1..,~_l'j if ., ^ f' "':)'~ .., "; f:: - It I' ':"',.'.J' ,-,' _ .-..; -'": . ,,:,\, . ~. ,..' (.r ft,v 1 ' P"? r2 (f'. : i' :sp .~~ I ;1.lo \.A. ~ ~~ J. -),.J-r~(,.l" 'i.~t a-f r:;".~ ~-I -i ~ :1 "t.. i...,d e- . - i -' ,...-.\ .-, .I"~I'f'L .-.... .... ",#- f . ~ '1... :1. .. ~_-rr .., - L r) /1"'._ \-.', ;...~ . "., .." :.". . L~..... I )) IA- '2 I """B~ .;.{'~:A ;, -L. h",;...~ c;c ..... ,~ f-j r,' / f \~.h i...( ,. ..... ~ { 6 Z f} . I .. f:'ttf'r'llLt, r' -~ d::. r~,.Jfc;{ ,tV of-d:d;:r.;C'!.. AI,), J ~ .~~. Ci k1 ~. -;, , I'N,1 AJ Ot~ luI thV ~;tl! r;/ I~O~;' .;. ns.t=ltJ j tic, fhvd ~QJ~(2.l) i (/:; ;'p",t,.. F~"'i 'Iff:'" ! . r.~-j J~" ~ S , / Nystrom & Associates, Ltd<:>< Brighton Professional Building 1900 Silver Lake Rd., Suite 110 New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 FAX: 628-0411 (612) 628-9566 TOO: 628-0407 February 4, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: I have had the opportunity to work as a psychologist for the Steps Of Success group home in Andover for the past year and a half My duties include individual counseling for several of the residents and a weekly therapy group for all the girls. Through out the time I have been there I have observed the work of Mr. and Mrs. Jahn and their staff. I am very impressed with the entire program but especially the following: '. 1. The quality and maintenance of the present facility and grounds. 2. The care taken to screen potential entrants into the program. ( Severely emotionally disturbed girls are not appropriate for this setting. ) 3. The level of discipline required of the girls in the program. 4. The sincere care and concern for each girls physical, emotional, and spiritual well- being. 5. The policy of24 hour supervision of the girls. 6. The emphasis placed on respect for authority and property. / I strongly endorse the program and believe the proposed move to the new location will enhance the S.O.S program and continue to provide a service that is very needed in the community. Sincerely, ..../d dk~ -M~ Thomas Heyer M.A. L.P. Licensed Psychologist '. . / Dr. Dean Soutor rrillt.iJlll1 Terry A. Abram A......tlciatc Prillcipal Linda Anderson A...:'tlc;afe PrillciPlil J. Craig Rounds A~...ociiltc PrillciJ.'ilf Ron L. Scott A:,:,ociatc Prillcipal David Tjaden A5...ociatc PrillcipllI Anoka High School 3939 Sl'vl'nth Avenue North Anob, Minnesota 533113-1299 (612) 422-5700 FAX: (612) 422-5724 February 3, 1994 Re: SOS Group Home To Whom it May Concern: For many years we have had students from the SOS Group Home here at Anoka High School. We have always found the staff at the group home to be very cooperative, concerned about the girls, and eager to work with our school staff in solving any problems that might come up. Some of the girls who have registered here have come from an unstable background and many of them have done poorly in school in the past. Through the care, concern, and support of the staff at SOS, we have seen many of them develop a good sense of responsibility and also increase their academic success greatly. The communication between the high school and the staff at the group home has always been positive, and we have found good support for our efforts to help students improve themselves socially, academically, and personally. We truly appreciate this cooperation. ely, a./~ BB/pf Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District 11 equal opportl/llities for educatioll alld elllplol/lllellt D11B81TRJ22 w I'r;,,/(d,)l1 I""'_l/d,'d I"'/"T , HARLEY CLINIC OF SOUTH CENTRAL MINNESOTA, INC. ANOKA COUNTY OFFICE 2006 - ht Ave. N., Suite 206 Anoka, MN 55303 (612) 421-5981 ; / May 18, 1990 Dayton and Kim Jahn Steps to Success Homes, Inc. 4100 - l60th Lane N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Dear Dayton and Kim: It was a pleasure meeting with both of you today in regard to the services and program that you offer through the group home program. We are in agreement in terms of our Christian value base and integrating this into our ministry and practice. I am extremely supportive of what you are doing at the group home and believe it is a tremendous program. I was also impressed with the two of you and who both of you are as people and as Christians. It was a pleasure talking with both of you and getting to know you better. I look forward to our pro- fessional relationship between your group home and our clinic and together helping the teenage girls that come through your facility. I would also just like to formally say that I would be available to serve on your board for the group home. If this is something that you would want, please let me know. Sincerely Yours in Jesus Christ, ffi1;~ Brian Nystrom, L.M.F.T., L.I.C.S.W. Clinic Director cc: file \ / Little Sand Group Homes I'~.:l' \',. ,,' :;:') Roule 1 - Box 61 Remer, MN 56672 2185662342 CONTINUOUS SERVICE SINCE 1976 Little Sand East Li' ~and For Girls ! For Boys Feb. 8, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this letter in behalf of Dayton and Kim Jahn. I have known and worked with them for three years in the Little Sand operation. During my first year at Little Sand they served as house parents at the group home. I worked closely with them and found them to be caring and conscientious to the residents of the home. They were firm enough to administer the proper discipline that is necessary in a group home, but at the same time they had the compassion that was needed to help the girls I work through the complex problems that resulted in their / placement. During the past two years Dayton Jahn has served as Administrator of the Little Sand operation. During his time as Administrator, Little Sand has expanded with a new boys program and a pregnancy and aftercare education program. With Dayton's leadership as Administrator, the Little Sand operation now has long waiting lists for all of their programs. Dayton and Kim have also operated their own foster home for girls during past two years in Grand Rapids. They operate their foster home with the same professionalism they exibited as houseparents at Little Sand. In addition to doing all' the cooking for her own foster girls, Kim Jahn also plans and prepares many of the meals for the residents at Little Sand's girls home. She is knowledgeable in creating well balanced meals that are appetizing even in the large quanity that is needed for a group home. Dayton and Kim have many years €xperience in working adolescents in a group and foster home setting. I recommend they be granted the licensing they are seeking in to open a new facility. with would order HENNEPIN COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CHILD PROTECfION DIVISION Health Services Building - Leve/11 525 Portland Ave. So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1569 , April 19, 1990 To Whom it May Concern: I am writing this letter to attest to the skill of Dayton and Kim Jahn in supervising and meeting the emotional needs of distrubed adolescent girls. I recently had in placement with them, a sixteen year old girl who had been physically, sexually, and emotionally abused. She had no father and her mother was a severe and chronic alcoholic. This girl came to the home with many unmet emotional needs, a lot of misplaced anger, confusion, rebelliousness and inappropriate sexual behavior. . / I found both Dayton and Kim to be very sensitive to her needs. They offered her the nurturance that she needed and were firm and consistent in their expectations of appropriate behavior from her. They provided the first normal parenting that this girl ever experienced. I will not hesitate to use the Steps to Success Foster Home in the future. Sincerely, ---I .7 12, Itfl'} r / / P' ) ,/ ~ .-" / ,I..._......?...-<-.,( --:r..--"'--../ L ",/ t Clifford Robinson, Social Worker Child Protection Services CR:jp HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer ((Centrallru1@ " I JERRY (JAKE) SORENSON 605 SO. LAKESHORE DRIVE #109 GLENWOOD. MN 56334 April 18, 1990 To Whom It May Concern: Dayton and Kim Jahn, Steps to Success, have been caretakers for our daughter Angie since October of 1988. I use the term caretakers but maybe caregivers would be more appropriate. My wife and I have never doubted for an instant that they both genuinely care for Angie. They have always sought the best action to take for Angies success. Concern for Angies future and her ability to survive in an adult world are evident in all that they have done for Angie. A good example of their real concern is the fact that they voluntarily provided financial help in sending Angie to a private high school when we could not afford to manage the tuition totally. Since Angie went to a school when none of the other girls did, it required Kim and Dayton to make extra sacrifices such as extra driving and scheduling to enable Angie to go to school there. I The Jahns have provided Angie with a structure and are trying to equip her with the skills she needs to live independently. Their home is open and caring and so Angie has learned that the support of family is extremely important. If Angie does not make use of the skills she has observed, it will be her decision and not because she was never taught them. We have recommended Steps to Success very highly. In fact we have become acquainted with two other families who have had problems in coping with their daughters and have suggested to them that they contact Kim and Dayton. If you would like to contact me or my wife for more information, please feel free to give us a call at (612)634-3521 or 634-5206. Thank you, /c/~(C t.1..:v<-- J~ke and Barb Sorenson -. / ',. . (. ,t.. . /. ',:1.1 ./ , CENTRAL LIFE ASSUF1MJCE COMPANY. 110MF on II:E: Of'S MOlt IF". IOWA ~n109 \ I ~ .. COUNTY OF ANOKA COMMUNITY HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOURTH FLOOR COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-422-7000 Public Health Nursing Services Environmental Health Sp.rvices Mental Health, Mental Retardation, Chemical Dependency Services Family & Children's Services Volunteer ServIces Developmental Achievement Centers January 23. 1990 Mr. & Mrs. Dayton Jahn, Directors Steps to Success Group Home Inc. 4100 l60th Lane Andover, MN 55304 Dear Kim & Dayton: \ I want to thank you for the care and service you provided to my two clients, Kay Jacobson and Chris Wiley. I know these placements must have become very frustrating to handle with the outside factors effecting the lenght of the placement. I feel what both girls gained from your program was very valuable. I also know that the insights you both were able to give to the girls parents was both helpful and timely. Kay's foster mom specifically mentioned to me the guidance which Kim gave her in setting up appropriate rules for Kay in their home. I know Mr. Wiley particularly appreciated your help with Chris at the time of her placment when she was so very angry at her father. He needed the placement in order to gain some needed control and authority in the home. I feel you helped him to achieve that goal. Thank you again for your consideration and cooperation with these placements. Sincerely, N c'-~--'-^-~ <.S-C~J>"":'-~_' Nancy Olson, MSW Social Worker Family Services North 422-7105 I NO/sls Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer t;" ) '\ ) (218) 547.1340 JOHN FJELSTUL Director DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES P.O. BOX 519 . WALKER, MINNESOTA 56484 February 5, 1988 Kim and Dayton Jahn 1121 S.E. 6th St., Grand Rapids, MN 55744 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I have been involved with approximately 12 months. under the custody of this for. the Jahn Family Foster Group Home for They have provided foster care to a child agency and for whom I have been responsible The Jahn's have provided excellent care for this child and there have been major improvements in this child's attitude and behavior throughout the . past year. The Jahn's have also been excellent to work with as far as cooperating J with the agency and the mandates and rules that we need to follow in order to fulfill the requirements of statute as well as court orders. I have . enjoyed working with thell. es a team effort in providing the care necessary fo~ the child that they are responsible for as well as being very cooperative in working with the child's parent. The Jahn's have gone the "extra mile" . in dealing with the child and her needs as well as her parent throughout the past 12 months. ~ Family Foster Group Home to agencies / AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 113 G 27th Annuc l':E J\1innc3polis, MN 55418 I'hon. 788-8526 , DA VE'S BINDERY August 1 I, 1988 Steps to Success Homes, Ine 4100 160th Lane N.W. Andover, t'1N 55304 Dear Dayton & Kim, '. I just want to take a few moments to thanf~ you for the girls we have employed here this summer on a part-time basIs You have done an excellent Job mstl11mg good work ethics into these girls. They are outstanding - THEY TRUL Y STAND OUT. The regular employees enjoy wor'king with them because they work hard, and accurate. We hear good comments from supervisors as well as co-workers almost daily. / Your extra effort personally to transport the girls on weekends when I needed them IS really apprecIated too We again congratulate you on what you a"e doing witli these girls. Sincerely, ') l: d/l:..{ of ') /.: -I- fjrjCj(f C~i..hl1/'iL 0.1./v ;; y (/ r Dave & Peggy (arpent ier / ~-O:.. . "'\. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION " , AGENDA ITEM 5. P.H. - SUP Steps of Success Home, 16676 Valley Dr. NW ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT -~ ..J...::, Lc---- DATE February 8, 1994 APPROVED FOR AGENDA Planning David L. Carlberg BY: City Planner BY: REQUEST The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the Special Use Permit requested by Steps of Success Homes (Dayton and Kim Jahn) to operate a group foster home for 10-13 girls, 12-18 years of age on the property located at 16676 Valley Drive NW (PIN 08-32-24-33-0032), legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Echo Hill. The property is zoned R-l, Single Family Rural. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit process. Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03 lists those uses allowed by Special Use Permit. In a Residential District, rest homes (group foster homes) are allowed under a Special Use Permit. In granting a Special Use Permit, the following criteria shall be examined. 1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. The use would not have a detrimental effect. The use would provide a service to the City and Anoka County. 2. The existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. Steps of Success Homes has been operating at 4100 l60th Lane NW for a number of years prior to receiving a Special Use Permit from the City in 1991. The City has not received any complaints regarding the operation and the parking facilities. 3. The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. John Leone, Anoka County Assessor, was contacted in 1991 to determine whether there would be a negative impact on the adjacent property values. Mr Leone informed City Staff that a group foster home should not depreciate adjacent property values unless the , home became dilapidated. . -- _.-. ~ ....,.....---... ._..._~. -. LicmscJ Foster/Group Since 1981 1t:..:.::,.:J. .~:__.;.. --:.:.:: :-::.~ -.-,.-.-.-..--. -.-,..' .. . 4100 160th Lane l'I1V Andover ~IN 55304 612 422.835~; :=0-:-::-:. : r-~~ , - To Whom It May L'ol1l:em: We arc required annually 10 UU Ihe I(lllowin!!: Meet with the person (rom the Department of Corrections to: a. sign a BC^ check lix all stair b. show proof of I X hours continued education credit c. shmv proof of current lirst aid training d. show proof that all staIr and residents have had mantoux lest within the last year Submit the results of a water test along with a completed application to ^noka Ilealth and Environmental Seniccs for a Class I () Food I-:slablishment and a Class 3 Lodging Establishmcnt. Show proof of a fire inspection every three years. Enclosed are copies of the license by the State Department of Corrections and the licenses Irom /\noka County Conununity I lealth and Emironmental Services. If there is any other inlormation you need, please contact me. Sincerely, 7~~ KIm .Iahn / Page Two Public Hearing - Special Use Permit Steps of Success Homes 16676 Valley Drive NW February 8, 1994 , i / 4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. The use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. GENERAL REVIEW Steps of Success Homes has been operating under a Special Use Permit since 1991 at 4100 160th Lane NW. The City to date has not received any complaints on the operation. Also, Staff did not receive any objections to the group foster home upon the mailing of the public hearing notices to those residents within 350 feet of the property. COMMISSION OPTIONS 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the Special Use Permit requested by Steps of Success Homes (Dayton and Kim Jahn) to operate a group foster home located at 16676 Valley Drive NW (PIN 08-32-24-33-0032), legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Echo Hill. I The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in Ordinance No.8, Sections 5.03, including: the use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestions or hazards; the use will not depreciate s~rrounding property; and the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the Special Use Permit requested by Steps of Success Homes (Dayton and Kim Jahn) to operate a group foster home located at 16676 Valley Drive NW (PIN 08-32-24-33-0032), legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Echo Hill. The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03. In denying the request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends option #1. Attached is a resolution for Commission review and approval. / CITY OF A~DOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -94 j A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES, INC (DAYTON AND KIM JAHN) TO OPERATE A GROUP FOSTER HOME ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16676 VALLEY DRIVE NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 1, ECHO HILLS. WHEREAS, Steps of Success Homes, Inc. has requested a Special Use Permit to operate a group foster home on the property located at 16676 Valley Drive NW, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Echo Hill; and WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was opposition regarding said request; and --- J WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission to allow Steps of Success Homes, Inc. to operate a group foster home on said property with the following conditions: 1. The Special Use permit be subject to a one (1) year sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(0). 2. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual review and site inspection. 3. The home shall be limited to no more than thirteen (13) adolescent girls per State licensing regulations. 4. The property shall be inspected by the City Fire Marshal. 5. The property shall be inspected by the City Building Official. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 15th day of February, 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER ; ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk ~"'\ . . ., 1 \ (' CEDAR LJCRES-r,' 'f' I I '-"'b ::'\.\ 3, ~'J .. ESTATEP. '~'., I . .. .. , ."(~~' IiI" , VALU.1' IVIEW:' .'.. I _~ I '. ".. ~; · '.:" . ". I.. ~ . 3' . E~T--?TE.S t... 4.. ~~""'~:.,:-j~::. .., ,2.,:. J' 'I' ~ ~ ~:" '. ~.' ~ ~\.~~t-~A~~4Y-'\~fs!;"'.." :: ~:!~ \-,-'..:'-- :'~'N.J ",,,,;,,>~,,:"<4'" ,S'" \...,.... ......; - -. ...,..:-.... ~~- _ -..~ _ _ ",_( "J. .' , " .... ::' --~_:"..: " : ..:.":~; I . /-d~TA:r-ES',;, . " ',- . ~ '..... ..' .....,.\". '-~,/,. ,y.,..... ~s"" i~- R-2'~-:,-'i/)~(~,i'~-'" , ' ::"', '. ...:..'......'....::.r--"'...;:....<.. --'- . PINE : .. /:::~::..::::.::D2:.\:~}: I' 1 ~ '..z:' I . 'Y.. I- CREST' I! IY~:'\. I Ifl : \ g r--/, '"""" '\ " , ~ ~'I/ '~1' /~I -"If- .......... ..,. ./!!::::!./ I 1..-" ; ~, EO . .~. (-~ Ai ;----, j( ---.., .,. . -' ~l fg' - - 1---" C';"(. ~ \ ::1 R_~ .t-..' ,.._>.., ..1 i:::P -r. · I ! -'- 1 ....1 vv !, ~,,\. V ~~ _~..j I _,~ . .\ q~~~::- - '-- )- ~ -(.I /,"" . J j[ It,."f : /-C..~ '" ... ?%<~~, ; ~fk:~ \~ =tl I =J -1 jiiiii '" I '"R': - " " ~~ I ~"-'~'. - .:. --:,"..0' , .. . '-", .0 ?--::., ".- . .7.;.::~,;:,1 ._;~ i_~, , I - , ?EO .. REGISTERED __ _ _.. _1-~Nl)__ __$l./ll'{~r _'~'_ ~ NO. 69-:--' . -:~ ~ R-'l ~~~1Z : ~":,jnuy : OJ ~ ---, IE 1 z, ~E.S' '~. =-- ~. --" ~ J . I, . ...-J~ ~ - _ .-. h.- ("" '-_.. SE .----:---..i'!-( I ......, .. I1."L.S:--NO.-61 }~, \'. J -....... -I , '. .., , ..:7' ~. FO~ N6- .. . " :J! "f-;: --/~ME~OW:S~--' JI - / , . ~. -' '.~ ) :' ::c \~( ,- J . ~ T .- ., ~ (i ~ .-/. -'J...__ -I.. ~.. ~ . , f-- r-- I ::=Jf-- ---j I--- -----l f-- I \ , , -- . .' , . . ,of'. :;-',., . I -~--. Q--.- r-~____ -,.tS'--..[p.:fPINE-A.~S ~:}c:-1 . C \c~ I. ..~:-< :J-~':';i}-~'L-- ,,0" ~ ''-~'~-- r,o -+-; - ~ ~ . 'iL....: I . ~ '2ND'ADD:4'1"",. ., l-.. z. l~N(jSFTH'r}(/lA""!, ' I'I-r lAN65F"nf-n",ANr ,_ J t L ..,><"'~~."" ,..L..n. '..JWCIT1CN ""f .'\-_ 'j- .'-- - I..' . I~ II f- - -- ~'- __ _ __ __ __ ~ ___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ j.~ , - ---:-;'\._- I 1 : I:L I Ir- I II , F '0' _ ,./~ 2 'ir-- ~ .,rRA/RIE,. ,!;~ '4 -I Gl J MEAOOWS ,..i;~ , ~ I ~~.~ p iC giE (\J' r<>' -' :, f1 -/iLJ~ I J {' .J ...'. / . -"; , --'i~ ~F ~ . !j,(I$- II ,:,- IE I "'~ .,! L,,'O~ iiii: j 4,\ ....... I : \. I I I - f-t-- ~PINE- .....)-- , ~JL~ /. · ~ ~ ~ . ,,',v..l -:I 1 :}~1~<~r\~ .;-.. --1 . _ JI. .f-- 2, I , I of- ~ / :- n , ~-: n I . ) J J r- I . ~w , > -, ~~ Ow ~, ---.--- .--.-- ---- /_-- 167TH AVE. -,--_. --- : I I N)f/-J- : .: / ;. ECHO , I 3 "li / /j . - .:-,1/ ~:I; .:- ~ -. ~: ::' ---: ---r ,.':'1 -I , -, ":. ---~---~ ::0<:- .".6 I 66llL L~.J'iE_ ~Vi.___ ___ 3 I 'I '. 1_ ",-,. ..L.~~_..J...._~ ~ ~ / ; - - - . I 'j'. - . -. :: . I Z ~ !: ~ 12 ;c :...SO......,g ::.. . .- HILL 4 ':'".: :-. ~ co !tl. .. - -- -- ----- c \JJ \ ~...>...: .. - - 1 _ '~;i.r- -, 'I ---- -t6--&t-H -~---N-:W- - - -- . ~.. ~ r':I' _:3 :.. '" ~ >-1 \JJ~ .-J, - .-J' <t: > \" i I - 'wo':' , 6.. <: ;.:: _ "''!'', ,tl -.0-. ~""- 1. "--I,,( COUNTy ROAD NO. 158 I ~ 1.~?5TH; .~VpJUE N.W. ~ C"." F @ .6 !: . - ---------- -------.-.-. -- --"- / sw. CORNER s. -- ~CRE~GE - - --- - - --- -----, ~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 Property Address SPECIAL USE PERMIT 11:- I I ,~. . /' --, i l,L'L' I !<- 1/ i' IN '-/ / j,-, 1,-':::"- ./ Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever is appropriate): Lot _.'A Block / PIN C ~3;/ ;}'-IJ30cJd-. . I Addition j:.- ..::. I, c I~ /. ;' j (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal description.) Is the property: Abstract v/ or Torrens '? (This information must be provided and can be obtained from the County.) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Reason for Request 10 /' Ollif~'-f-,:- ~ &-rOV'-h f / ,;:::'r,J /C./f. hb /)Jc, . , , Section of Ordinance S~ 5: 03 Current Zoning ,17_ / !l . --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of Applicant l) 0 VI fell ~'n.''- ,1. - ;' O:h. ,J1/ /\'1 ,. Address '-II'.., Ii ~ L-,V . vI., Horne phone L/ 2/)':{, ]S(j 1/ --r; r i'l)' ,1..4)-; !; /~f ; 1 d C 1/ -( f~ ('-'7 (v -",.~ L / .,) j ''/ C 7 Business Phone S{...nl"- .' - .....-: ~/ - j /' /C"i.-r"y7 .... r7:'c ~~ -- / Date I I (' I r, , i i . , I -. '+ I ; I . , ' I j Signature --------------------------------------------------------------------- Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Horne Phone Business Phone J Signature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------- " ' SPECIAL USE PERMIT PAGE 2 , ' -( ~''-)' " ,,; i ~..... __ c'..' 'J . .. ...../ . \,'~ L' v , .' t .......,..{ ',/'-:..1 \', . ) , " The following information shall ," City of/Andover: / L1. be submitted prior to review by the / A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected showing: scale and north arrOWj dimensions of the property and structuresj front, side and rear yard building setbacks; ~~-ent E~~~tSj and location and use, of existing structures ft1~.!!.in 100 feet:. i' ~', L'J ,. ,', .r".:........, v l " ,2. The names an~dresses of all property owners within 350 feet ( of the subject property. 77;./ / ,-,I " ; } "--, "l I - ;,~ '! .' ~ ~"': .. - ,. Application Fees: Commercial Residential Amended SUP Recording Fee $190.00 $150.00' $ 50.00 $ 20.00' $ /ViO.(}U Date Paid I Receipt # 4C; ~13 Rev. 5-06-93:d'A Res. 179-91 (11-05-91) CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and: 1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. 2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and lands. 3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. 4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. ) .., ~ :':: =- ,. ::i 11II ~ .., ..., ::i '" ~ 11II r-- .., - " :; ;:; .., .., ~ .., r, ~ ;:, r .., ~ .., ! :- .., .., :- .., - ~ .. .. .., :r. ,- ;.'<;' ~ ~ '" :2 ~ ; .., :- eel I ~ ~ ,?, ~ .., ~ ;:; - ;~ ~ '!:.l;1 t::;' ;; :- - "" ..; :r. '\ ~~' .... ;;- :r.:. ~ .., g ~. " lr.{ '" !' :- 3' ~~' ~ ...., .., ;:;. .., ~ ;; ~I ~ ::r 8 ~ ~ ~ .., Co :; '" :- .., ~ .., ~ - :c: =-:f-. ;: .., I ""~ n' '~ ..... ~ .., = :- ~ ..... -. ':)<'< :- 'l ':-' "- 'i < ...., .... 'l, :r. - ~ ~ ~ < ! ...j "-~ - ~ r, ~ x- :- - ['1:; ~ ;;- '~ '" ~. ~ ;:; ~ ;; ~ .., =- r~. ;:; .., ~ :: ~ ~ '" ~ r'~~ ~ "- '~ =- " .., --I = - .., ~ ::: ::r .., ,- Co - .., ..... n' ;:; .., ;:; - ~ - ~~-.: ~ - :- < ;; "" n' '":~ ~ ~ .., .., Co < ~~ r;: x-"" ;:; ;: ~ :- "" :- :- ~ =:::: :; - .., '"' > ~~ c.; :- - ::: ~ ~ c ;.n '" '" ~ " '" ~. " r;: Co. :: S. Co. C ~ ;;- ... ::: .. :- .... :- ~ '" " :: (!. :- .... .... ~, :; :- ;;, ;; :- I';l .... ~ 0 n - n 0:; "" ... '" ~ ... ~ ... '"' ~ ~ ,!;, ;a. ~ " .., ~ ~ ~ .., g .., :2- ;; " ~ ~ '" ~ ;:; .:1 :::- ~ .., 3 '"' " :2 Co ~ " .., e:- ~. < ~ .., 0- ~ " c ... - ;; ;;; '" ~ '? '"' " ~~~-Jcn ~ ~ ~ ~~ nl :::J -. :It :: 'IS'" <0 "'3n'~ a~e..~cn Q.lI::l;; (;'C: ~ (i;' ~ ~R ::l ~ =;} ~ .Q: t':l __UI :.I DI;; ij;' ::s c..__.~ Co (;;' 9 3 ::l on<o- =~"O~~ ~~~;;~ Oc..c..3o cnO""rr~ ;g C,.C'1>> 3 =-c. ~. i" . :? ~::::!1:EQ: o ::J :::::I t'O ;::: ;;: ~ 0 "< . =- p. ~ 0- t'O::!.,,,,,, ... IIII g:~~E-:::i a;;- g..r;:::~ !.:)=-~~'g ::::.-0::;,,;; vo g..::::~ :!.~ ~ ;;~'tii.;.;-~ ~ ~ _.JC. ~ g =. 0 ::::l :J ::s - ~ ~ ~~ c..~ '" ~. :.I-t ~~g-2..;:::~ ="':J :.J = ":J ~ :: ~g ~ ~ :::- 3 ~ 5' S. ~ t'O l1) n :::I """l n <: ::l t'O _. t'O c.. j;'- ~ = c..::r :;: 0 t'O ":J ...-'< ~-c..~o=- ~~ ~ ~~... "'" =: - ~ g =-~ g ~ . t'O. C. t'O 3~::l " c:r- s s-:: ~;o.~ =-' -;::;;; _ =- t'O c.'"'"" O'-S ~ g.::; ~ x:. -:1'1 ~ ~. ~ ~ 0 .., ~ -n ;::'n:.J '" " ~ . ""'l ~ ::: c :r.:. = . '< ~ ~!2. "" 5 g ~ ~ ::: ~~ !tJ ~ IIII :::lg-:;:'-i =':9-.(':1 r; ;:; = ::!,n :;. os. ~ ~~;O' g~3a- 3 ~ ~ :2: t';t =="::1 t';t ~ ::-~~ :::-~:: t';t _:= ~~~ ;:; := ::;. C,I\~~ -~ ::I ~ !. :;;:.:= .., '"'"" ~ ::: ~ ~~ ~. "'_Co. e:-o... 2~~ Vi c.,:""'I ..,.., - "':::l = '5 ::: 5'- 3 ~ -~ =^ ~ =: " ... ;<' ~ _. - ... = ... o. :.. n o - ... n t':l ... :: CIl ~ c ::.. _. q n E:i t':l - c{ ... c. 0< ~ ... s. 9 ... :; I';l :: .... :!!. 0'1,0. "''' n - ~ ... :::-3 ::: - 3'< "Co. ::i ~ :A~ ~f.5. ~ J:A ;5':;' . . . . . . . . - . . . ("l . . . . . "':l . . . "'" Jill - ;" 3. e:- n ~ 3. ::: ~ 3 n "" ~ n 3 ... ='- ~ '" '"' ~. ~. " .., " ;;- ... g - '" 0 0:; ~. :; .., ~ :: -'5 ~ < ~ 0 ~ ] :.> ~. ... " :. '^ ~ '" .., "" "" "" ;;, ;;, :; ~ Q n 0 .., " ::. '< :: .., '< ~ 0 0" !:l ~ .- :::'~ ;:; '< ;;; :S, ~ ~ ~ Q n ;;, "3 c ~ E. "" =.. "3. ='- :: :r.:. ~. ;;, :!!. ::: ::: ::: 3' ;; ... g S; ;;- ::: " .... :r.:. :r.:. :r.:. 0' :r.:. ,0. =.. 3 -< -< ~. ~ .., :r.:. - .. '" ::: .., n' "" Co 3 C'-:J !!. n ~ g, ~5 ~. ~ :r.:. ,0. ~ 5!, 0 5 ;;' 1":7:. ~ ;;; ~ ;;, :::, ~ ... 3 ,0. :: :2 ::: ;:; :- g. Co. ~ Co.~ -< .., ~ :I' = ::: ::l 3 .., ] E- =:. r? ... ... C n "" "" ;:' ~ [ :.> :r.:. -< 0 .., ~ ~: Co. .. ::: c 0 .., .., ~ .... c n. "" Co " ~ i .., ~ n ='- .., " g :- "" " ='- ~ ,a " ::. g' g' '< n ~ I';l '" :. -< '" :r.:. ~ ~ '"' ;;, x- '" !2- '" '" - n - ;'l>~UlO -::.....-~ ~C.O.g~ .;:..QC:.nQ ~;:;.... :: ~.:'O')~'- ?':"",O:Jl=.. ~2 n= ~ -n ~, ~ ~ ~ ~~'^~ ..~;~ - - '" :: '^ . - " - - .. '" /") = .. en "'1 '" .. 3 '" .. '" ~g~~.:E 3 - c- c;;- t';) t';) :='0"" ('I = 5.~.~~ l'")'" n n _ ~~~~~ ,"< n =:::!.toI =: ~ - <: - n' ~~c. ;:; ;: ~O'":: =-~~~~ n '< ~ ;:: _. ~'",=, =::-~ S!?3=-=e.. ""''''=' ~r;;;;;' ~ (i""';:l =!:!. ~~~='~ ::n;i 3 ~g ~ ~ s:-~ 5' n -.""'1 - ""'I C/O Q..O c.._ :"og~~ C _1""1 VI ... ":" ('O;l t';t c/o. a ;i g ~. ~ g; 3 ... ~ ~ 100 :..~ ;:;j.g ~::;':::"= ~::ItoI~;::.::; o ;::..;:; _~ ~ =~e!:l'nC,l\ -"':::l!.ll:: -~ ~n:ll:"'=~_ ~. ~ 5 Vi':: s. i ~ ~.=: ~:?. ?~~;;s:-~ ~5:?.~~ r::r ~ 0 -. '" ~oS~s ~ ?'"~:5 t;' _.:J n "'" =.J 5e:~~g. _ l").Q "< ~ ;; = ~ E...-..: VI :0 =:.", 0 '5 ~ (i'~; =? ~ ~ ;:;;"'::e. Q' ... :; ~ 0- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Address: * * * * * * * * * * * As provided by the ordinances of Anoka County, a license is hearby issued to , , ) * * * * * * * Licensee: * * Est. Name: * * LICENSE Anoka County Human Services Division Community Health & Environmental Services Department Courthouse - Anoka, Minnesota 55303 STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES, INC. STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES 4100-160TH LANE N.W. ANDOVER, MN 55304 Lie. No.: 5059 Est. No.: 1481 License Fee: $100.50 * STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES, INC. , as conditioned below, for the ) . . * operat1on of a Class 3 LOdging Establ1shment * * at the location stated herein for the period 02/01/93 to 01/31/94 subject to * * all provisions of said ordinances. * * * * * Conditions: None. * * * * * * * * t;-~~~~$L~ Director, Env1ronmental Services * * * * * * NON-TRANSFERABLE Date Issued: February 01, 1993 ,)* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Licensee: * * Est. Name: * * Address: * * * * * * * * * * * As provided by the ordinances of Anoka County, a license is hearby issued to , ) * LICENSE Anoka County Human Services Division Community Health & Environmental Services Department Courthouse - Anoka, Minnesota 55303 STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES, INC. STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES 4100 - 160TH LANE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 Lie. No.: 4538 Est. No.: 1482 Lic~n:::e Fce: $65.00 as conditioned below, for the * STEPS OF SUCCESS HOMES, INC. ~ ~peration of a Class 10 Food Establishment * * at the location stated herein for the period 02/01/93 to 01/31/94 subject to * * all provisions of said ordinances. * * * * * Conditions: CONDITIONED BY JANUARY 6, 1992 VARIANCE * * * * * * /~ /" /J '-"/o'/rV' {/J ~-~-rr~' --7/j/;'.tb~'~L,~e> ~..._., Director, Environmental Service~ * * * * * * * * NON-TRANSFERABLE Date Issued: February 01, 1993 ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * , l ,. . C u') ~ ~ c cn !\i <! t,j -' -::r-1 C....i <! r'J Q t.... 0>- 00 II I, i ,~ :l P-iWj u.LJ... I To! CZ OH C<! .,..;e::: ':to ':!" ("J 8_, N, r'')H "- c= <! 11~ .....0 HZ Ci..<:: ) Ll.: __ C C;- CO::::: ..... I,: ~.; ;:; ~ =-.' (',.; :::: ,,'.,; j.....j ~ :...i..i - ..... '.' !--j <:: ~ ! c;; w:: ....' ~ <! W ~ 3 ':t ..., ,... ~ ~ _ p."": - :; ir,l )- ;t'; ~ -J ..... .JE <:: :>" !.:..l N:> ':to !'.Co -oZ 'r"'i<(C u Z H 0. W !.U l.1.. ~ Z W :> <! t.') ~ ~ Co t... zirl o tr,l U l.iJ= Ci'J.... Lt", <: ~::::: r.")o ('J -r <: , <f i- ~ 3: Z ::. . ~ ,.~ - ~ v Q :'; ;,:; >-:: '"~ ~ -1~ <: :>c:::: ~ '=- ::. ~. ~ COC ....:; .,..;<: , -' >- .-~ D ~ ~ :'-'..l W t'J O~ ~ ~ t.; :3 !'; :;;:1- C'.J i- t\i b Brrl " ~ "0. -~ 1-<0 u..3 >- " <:: ~!: o O~ o N-' t.') ::::r~ ('''; -- NO t."'l -. 05 '- OW uO , II! ~O Ci...-r. e:: Id ,. o "l"""'i~ ...... h! O~ (-.in ~~ N c..,: _ r,; " ~ ....... ~ r'.; c ~<: '-'- ~ ~ .=. .' - " ~O ,-~ ~.': - " !.!"'; >- U"".: W ~ ' -i:E: <:: :>~ !.i.J ...c -:-- f'..O -00- "'Z ..-;<:: e:: :3 Z " Co':!" o >- t.') WI!"; ..J !!'") ~ <!Z :> ..-;<:: t.') :::: ;-"0 -oZ T"'!<! -' L:.. .". ^ ~ .~ :') 3: ~; >-~ 5 -' C:CZ:: ~ 'l""'! _' ~c ....:; c tt; < .-. I'; O~ ~ v oCt:. r.; r,; _ ':t l:\~ (f; N<! t.; :E: w!-! ON I: ~ , Z :01 ~t r'J ~ o C_ " ~ t.,,"; :I: ,.') !- :::-W (.~ ~ C:: ~ r. J u.: r.t.' .....' ,:,:- ~ as !J'J -IX; !-; Ci c..~ U":: C'.; -::; C o :::r-i ~k! '7 ~.__-. C'.J C'''; I ~."" ~- - :.1 ....... ...., u ...,.. H w...~ tn ,~ "" <: H N .., - .., '"'"' u.. 3 ..:.. .-", '"'- Q:::!, ~ ~ )- t.; w It".: -! It".: < :> . ..-;<! ('J :::: ~~ ..-;<:: <! >- ~ e:: W :> w ~ '" ..-; t.') u"; QII') it< u') .... to') Io-o;Z .. ~ , -' 0-. b:.' ;-.. 'P-i<: ('''; ..... ~n H I.: ~ N <:: ~ ~ ~ "'- ""': ...... I.: ~ "'" <c ".- :..:: ~ .. :- ". ~.: ..0 "-c ,,' ~ o;r :c ....~ c C:E: ~ ~ r.'" Z h.... ~W r\i Z C\J Z r.; L.U CO:::=:: " V a; Cf'J .Y. - - HQ iJ..~ C-~ o 0_ " ~ t.') ,.') ;- c:r~ (....i .J:.. C...,i " r.") w CO::':: ~ "" z: t..'1 Z~ 1-<0 Li..::.::: O~ ~ ~ - ~ - !': :':. ~ - ~ ".: ,. r..; ~'-:' - ~:::::. .- ..... I: :,.;.: ,.... u..~ <:: >- . i:2 ,., ~ - -'" i.!J IX; .~ ,', J!j OLi":l j:Q mE:: t.l'J HZ E!-! ~ 0-. f:.' l' .,..;< C\J -- ....;Q <! >- ~ c.c 1Jj :> !J..i .:::c -0 r! ,.') tf"; Co I!", ."t". .... , t,:j :c: en H_ _H ~ 0- b..... i'- ~ ~.' (oJ 'l""i(J <: >- -' ~ l,l '"'"' ~. !d ;....: :'': :.t; 0::; ~ U.' _ ([) I-< . . - . 0- ~ ~c (\i ~- '" " -.; O!-i ~. ~ - ~w ~N ('J ~-,-' c....: t.; i'Z OW .: tn _Z i-i!..iJ :I I'"':, r."'J t.') eo?! ~ ~ oCt: ,.""; t.') ~ ~W (.... !--! C'.,i ,.') < w>'=l .., ~ u C.!) ,. !os"'.! HO ....:> '" 1'- eo?! _. ~ O:E: " '-' nz t.; ~ ~ (....1 c....: ~,; co:::::: .- ~ .II: ;.:; _:::: .. ~: v 3 , " i..l.iO ~ r.,,; <:: I!"; r-~ !!:;E -0 ~e::: id ;-..5 ":""lO ~- Q"~ <! to <! U U !.U .:Ii W " :3 :z: ~ C!:O Qt.') I!", >- I!", ~ i~ <r :>c::: ill 05 r."j c! -oQ "'= ..-;<: c >-; i:2 I.: ~ :> i.!1 .-. - LiJ -c ...' ::;:- j',: I',' :t'.. C c~ ...... .-. .-. ~~' r::5 t.',; ,. ::- ;- C\j C C\: ::::: t.; co "..., ~ u :z: v; _ to I-< l)-.il.. ~~ ".: .. .-. - <.! c: ;-"'i ~ -. -;:;. .' ~ .. '-. o r.-: .-. ~.. >- ;.r; - c :> ::-.: :> ;.....; :"-,' -.c .< ;i~'; '0 1 4,L' ~:,..;.' '~.;.~~:: CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, February 8, 1994 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use Permit request of Steps of Success Homes (Dayton and Kim Jahn) to operate a foster group home at 16676 Valley Drive NW (PIN 08-32- 24-33-0032), legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Echo Hill. All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. '. ) A copy of the application and location will be available at Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. b~ J-t'& Victoria Volk, City Clerk Publication dates: January 28, 1994 February 4, 1994 ; / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA SECTION t-O. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM I'D. Jed Larson Sketch Plan Andover Review Committe ~ BW 4. The City Council is requested to review the Jed Larson sketch plan as requested by Jed and Peggy Larson. The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan and their comments are as follows: General Comments * The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-1 Single Family Zoning District with a minimum lot size of 108,900 square feet. \ Five (5) lots are being proposed. ) * All lots will front onto City streets except Lot 5 which currently accesses to 165th Avenue NW which is currently County Road 158 will require a variance from Ordinance 10, Section 9.02 C. If home or garage is destroyed or removed the lot must access to Eldorado Street NW. * The ARC is recommending the cul-de-sac at the north end be eliminated and the street be constructed to the west property line to allow future development to adjoining property owners and to eliminate a long dead end of which the Fire and Sheriffs Departments are concerned about. See Sketch A drawn by the ARC. Also see attached Ordinance 10, Section 9.02 A. * All lots will require to meet Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 a(3) which relates to lot size requirements and buildable area. The property is not located within the MUSA area. Therefore, the lot shall "be buildable which meets the 39,000 square foot requirement. CONTINUED MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: , ) * The Water Resource Management Plan which was recently updated and approved by the Andover City Council, Coon Creek Watershed District and the Lower Rum River WMO is to be implemented with the development. * The 100 year pond elevation based on ultimate development will be required to be identified on the preliminary plat. In addition, drainage and utility easements are required for the 100 year flood elevation. * The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lower Rum River WMO, LGU, MPCA and any other agency which may be interested in the site). Initial contact should be made with the City regarding this item. * There may be wetlands within the plan that must be delineated by agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local Government Unit is the Lower Rum River WMO. The developer shall contact the Watershed to discuss the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act that is in effect. * The developer is responsible to meet City Ordinance 8 and 10 and all applicable ordinance. Remember: This has not been studied by staff in detail as most of the detail will be reviewed with the preliminary plat. \ ) Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Commission will be reviewing the sketch plan at their February 17, 1994 regular meeting. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Commission is recommending the sketch plan presented by the Larson's is acceptable due to the discussions and sketches presented to the City over the past year. Note: Keep in mind this sketch plan had never been reviewed by the entire Andover Review Committee until just recently. Because of those concerns by the Fire and Sheriffs Departments for access and Ordinance 10, Section 9.02 A the Andover Review Committee felt it was in the best interest of the City to recommend Sketch Plan A. F~m 02.DINANGL: 10, \ ) map shall show the proposed street layout and the layout of all existing streets platted or unplatted, within one-half (1/2) mile of the proposed plat. The streets and roadways shall be labeled with their proposed or existing names. Adjacent platted areas shall be labeled with their plat name. (10F, 8-18-80) " J. The preliminary plat shall show the number of linear road miles within the plat. (lOF, 8-18-80) K. The preliminary plat shall show the location of all "Area Identification" signs. Special Use Permits for area identification signs shall be applied for in conjunction with the preliminary plat in accordance with the zoning Ordinance. (IOU, 8-04-92) SECTION 9. SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS. 9.01 General Requirements. A. The Planning Commission in its review of a preliminary plat shall determine whether the proposed subdivision is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, and shall take into consideration the requirements of the City and the best use of the land. Particular attention shall be given to the arrangement, location and widths of streets, drainage and lot sizes and arrangements. \ I J B. The preliminary plat shall contiguous land, but the final of the preliminary plat provided approved preliminary plat. cover all of the owner's plat may cover only a portion it is in conformity with the C. Where the parcel of land is subdivided into tracts larger than required for building lots, such tracts shall be divided so as to allow for the opening of streets and ultimate extension of adjacent streets. D. unplatted portions of land (outlots) or private easements controlling access to public ways shall not be approved within the plat. 9.02 Street Plan. -If A. The arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all streets shall conform to the Comprehensive Plan, the approved standard street specifications, and all applicable Ordinances, and all streets shall be considered in their relation to existinq and planned streets, to reasonable circulation of traffi~ to topographical convenience and ~safety, and in their appropriate relatlon to the proposed uses of the area to be served. " I / B. The arrangement of streets in new subdivision shall make provision for the continuation of existing and future streets in adjoining areas. Page 10 CAINE &- A OCIATES LAND SURVEYORSI INC. . 17720 Highway 65 N.E. - Ham Lake, Minnesota 55304 434-7646 SKETCH PLAN FOR:JED LARSON . ,- I , I _" I ;" I. I . :r I ...: OWNER & SUBDIVIDER - Jed Larson I . 4143 16~th Ave. NW I I Andover, MN, 55304 J 8 g 427-8481 I ~ q ~ q I - --1--- APPROXIMATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of . I . Section 7, T. 32, R, 24, Anoka Co. MN, I I PROPOSED USE : 5 Single family residential lots. DATE OF PRI::PARATION : January 25,1994. \ "'. ~ . . ".. 530 t " ._ .fdS;d"'~, -', ~ I -z..(p Ac. t '. : ......' , , , 1-< " (,2) . '2. ; (.9,1/.1) 2 ... '(-wIIL ~ j '</~u't ~ z::....""" ' 2 I. A.t.. t.. , " /d.~R. , , I " ~ , ~ . ~ , " 4.9~-----_~_m " I I \i. I ' 26.66 I (.:) I . I. 3 .J I . I <l-.t 292.69 .. Z.'l "Cot (905:0) '. ~I ~ i.. .... I I ~ I I '(sot r-l----'--------___.:.....I i J ~'!i WE:' '. I . . ~ ~_ _'..!2."...:.T"""; ~ _ .:.. J /,'-/4) ~ . (:'I3CO) , (929.0) -Ii ~ rlCJg!:''::r.. 11 ~\ ~ (7) (to) Y(c".."n S 't '. (3:020) 1;:'';10) :J 5ieferl. '4 '. I~ (5) /" ~ : - C~ \- I I ; '. ftJ SArA.1e'_ . . . Q'5' I~~ ' 306.98 '._ '.~ r--, n 1t''S .j L--j-J.lo....St. . " ~ (' I ' /. - (/.1): f... (p) ,', I .7 Ac. t (;>f=-? rUIO) (9<'".-) /ft'_ . fit,,,,.,,,. P'4H"--'? . /1"'9"''' ;t;'r ,. '~"C'J'~ ''''''''''-'':/7,1.. (N.rh"Y /r;'r41f,$. ,Ji;d"rf ./ ~ /A.. - ~an'.rk,f. JOhe.r ~ / ..2 1"'1 'I~ l\ .SJ~c. ,.&,q//e. ~ . . (COUNl:Y 5"E1~'" ^ "-- .. ~---~.. ~ ~b 1\(1 M E)J; Pilt1;> ..BY A ~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY PLAN . OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR' UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SCALE: 1 INCH = 200 FEET. ~ o DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE SET. 0.~ /71. (>.A. f . DENOTES fOUND IRON MONUMENT. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. DATE J'a.H. ? Si / 99~ REG. NO. 12251 JOB NO. 9'-1- - f 7 SEC. 7 T. 32.. R. 2:f CAINE &- A SOCIATES LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 17720 Highway 65 NE. - Ham Lake, Minnesota 55304 434-7646 SKETCH PLAN FOR:JED LARSON ~" I. :r ..; OWNER & SUBDIVIDER - Jed Larson o 4143 165th Ave. NW I Andover, MN. 55304 8 g 427.8481 ! ~ APPROXIMATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of . Section 7, T. 32, R. 24, Anoka Co. MN. PROPOSED USE: 5 Single family residential lots. DATE OF PREPARATION: January 25, 1994. 530:t.. 4'''5:''1'5. ~ . ~ . ~ ..... I .., Cl z/,>Ac.t N ..... ~ ~ 'I ", - ., \1Q.. ... ~ ' ,/ ""'.... ,~. \ , ~I " (,t) . ~ : (j~N) ~ 2 ' '.(.W~tL 05 J .4~ZI!'t T. ~S.F.V . 2,(. A.c. 10.. , /<U~.N. . : ~ ~ . ~ " ~ , ~ ~ II) "--" u.___._-;;-:q~. u._..L ~, 4-1 (jdd"') (\ () \ 26.0/: \) 0 '" (3), '. N 3 <Y) ~ .. '" Z."l Ac. t (905:0) ". ..., '. I Q 'isoto ' '. N ----- J '" .......(4) . (OJ ~ '. w ~ 4 (929.0) ~ - ~ 2.S Ac. H-= 'G.30t. .~ ~ ~ . '" ~ . Ii 0 o. ~o (/"-) 'I' ~ '(" I\:' G^......'e. . /3SI<. ':l '" __ "."S 1M' ' ~ I, ~90 ~, L--J--No~5~ I ;g 5 (/d) ? N 2..7 Ac. t , 'IN"',? (,,~o) (9".~ . /'!~n'/"" P~dIf4/i. . .//OJ'l!tr 1':"f ' fvqt?/~n~. (Hl?h~Y /(qr~",S. JJl:r~rf- ~'.#.I'?.r~h. ~ ./PhdS:t / ,z "" ; 11, .$.7,.,.~. ~ .I>o;'/e. ~ . +€-EH:ftffv-'R " -- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY. PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DUL Y REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SCALE: , INCH = 20c> FEET. ~ o DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE SET. -'71. r.A. ;. . DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. DATE..J:::?-C. s;. /99ft' REG. NO. 12251 JOB NO. 94- - I 7 SEC. 7 T. 3L R. z:f CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Februarv 15, 1994 AGENDA f\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Items Planning ~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 00. Amendment to Ordinance No.8, Sections 4.04 and 8.23 David L. carlberg City Planner BY: 5. REQUEST The City Council is asked to approve the attached amendments to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.04, Lot provisions and Section 8.23, Residential Building Standards. ) Said amendment to Section 4.04(C) will require an access drive, built to City Standards as specified in Ordinance No. 17, when the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street or thoroughfare. Currently, the access drive must be constructed as indicated above when the distance is more than 300 feet. Said amendment to Section 8.23(C) will allow exceptions to the 4/12 roof pitch requirement for single family dwellings. Three- season porches, greenhouses and solariums may be constructed at less than a 4/12 roof pitch provided they meet the Uniform Building Code and are approved by the Building Department. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their January 25, 1994 meeting, recommended the City Council approve the attached amendment(s) to the Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ) TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORD NO. 8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No.8, Section 4.04 is hereby amended as follows: Section 4.04(C) An access drive to every principal building shall be provided and constructed according to the minimum standards of the City of Andover as s ecified in Ordinance No. 17, An Ordinance Establis ~ng M~n~mum E evat~ons an Stan ar s for Bui ding and Dr~veway Construction when such building is tAree-A~Heree-~eet- +~GGL+ one hundred fifty feet (150') or more from a thoroughfare or street. Section 8.23(C) meet All other sections of the zoning Ordinance shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 15th day of February, 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk \ . / Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 11, 1994 Page 7 J (Discussion - Amend Ordinance 8, Seciton 8.23, 4/12 Roof Pitch, Cont.) salt-box style home became popular. He felt strict enforcement of the requirement would eliminate many architectural options. Mr. Carlberg noted the City does have an R-5 zoning district for manufactured housing, though one is not designated on the map. He also handed out a brochure of Patio Enclosures, Inc., noting the different designs of three-season porches. He did not think the variance procedures would be proper since it has nothing to do with the topography of the land. He has not noted any other three-season porches in the City which do not comply with the roof pitch, though there may be some. In discussing this with the Building Department, they would not recommend changing the ordinance. Commissioner Putnam was concerned that the roof be sufficient to handle snow loads and wind currents. Commissioner Peek felt it would be sufficient if the retailer or manufacturer could provide data that a different pitch meets the snow loads and wind currents. James Wilkerson, local branch manaqer, Patio Enclosures, Inc. explained the specific structure in question will have a paneled roof. There are different types of rooms, sun rooms, three-season porches, solariums, green houses, that are acceptable with 3/12 roof pitches, curved glass roofs, etc. He stated the various pitches are a norm of the industry. He represents a nation-wide company in 28 locations, installing this type of room allover the United States and Canada. He , has engineering data to give to the Building Department that will J substantiate the roof will meet any code with regard to snow loads and wind loads anywhere in the U.S. or Canada. They can produce the data, stamped by a registered engineer in Minnesota. He has been with this company for almost eight years, and this is the first permit he has had disallowed because of the pitch of the roof. Because their engineering supports the one-half inch per foot of slope on the paneled roof system without a shingle for drainage, snow loads, wind loads, etc., it has never come up. He hasn't found any other communities that adhere to the 4/12 roof pitch. Mr. Wilkerson stated they can build at any pitch, but this limits the type of business and cliental he can service because of the expenses involved. Whether the roof pitch is to match with the home or is put in as an economic factor will vary on a case-by-case basis. They are an established, recognized organization. Also, they have had increasing inquiries for their sun rooms from Andover residents; plus this is not the first room they have done in the City. He was also under the impression that a variance was not an option in this situation. Mr. Carlberg stated he did not research what other communities require. In discussing this with the Building Department, it was determined the best thing to do was to bring it to the Commission for consideration since it may be coming up again in the future. They do have an option to apply for the variance, but there is no rationale for granting one. Because it is reasonable to assume this issue will come up again in the future and because the Commission felt a different pitch on these types of room additions would be acceptable if the engineering data supported the required structural codes, the Commission discussed a change to the ordinance rather than using the variance procedure. They did not want \ ) Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 1994 Page 4 '\ ) ~)PUBLIC HEARING: AMEND ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTIONS 4.03, 4.04 AND 8.23 8:23 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the proposed amendments. Section 4.04(C) will requ~re an access drive, built to City standards as specified in Ordinance No. 17, when the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street or thoroughfare. The amendment is not retroactive. Section 8.23(C) would be amended to remove the 4/12 roof pitch requirement for single family dwellings. Section 4.03 is the non- conforming uses and structure portion that will be discussed later together with amendments to Ordinance 44, Junkyards. The Commission agreed to hold separate hearings for each Chairperson Dehn opened the hearing for the amendment to 4.04(C). There was no testimony. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Apel, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on as-Yes, 2-Absent (Pease, Putnam) vote. section. Section MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Apel, that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the amendment to Ordinance 8, Section 4.04(C) as presented. Motion carried on as-Yes, 2-Absent (Pease, Putnam) vote. J Chairperson Dehn then opened the hearing for the amendment to Section 8.23(C). Euqene Boos. 133rd Lane - knew of no structural reason why the ordinance should not be changed. The addition they want to add to their house, a three-season porch, is structurally sound; and he sees no reason to have it denied just because it is not a 4/12 pitched roof. As it is, his house does not meet code because the dormers do not have the 4/12 roof pitch. Mr. Almgren explained this requirement was adopted as a result of a law passed by the Minnesota Legislature that must allow manufactured homes, mobile homes, on any lot in the City. Most mobile homes cannot meet the 4/12 pitch requirement; although a manufactured home can meet it, noting there are several very nice ones located in the City. It is not a structural issue. His office receives one or two inquiries a month on locating mobile homes on lots within the City. Deleting this requirement would allow mobile homes on any lot in the City. Mr. Boos - wondered if the porch is not considered an addition to the house, why must it meet the roof pitch requirement. Mr. Almgren stated that was the Council's wishes. Porches are considered part of a single family dwelling by definition. He noted the only problem with converting porches to a living area is meeting the requirements of heating, insulating and footings. \ ) The Commission suggested the 4/12 roof pitch for single family dwellings not be eliminated but that the Building Official be given authority to vary the roof pitches of porches, sun rooms, etc., as long as they meet Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 1994 Page 5 '\ J (Public Hearing: Amend Ordinance 8, Section 8.23, Continued) the structural requirements. Mr. Almgren stated that can be done. There could be a problem if someone wants to convert a three-season porch into living quarters, as that could not be done if it does not meet the 4/12 roof pitch. The Commission felt the residents should be advised of those items when applying for the building permits. MOTION by Jovanovich, Seconded by Peek, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on as-Yes, 2-Absent (Pease, Putnam) vote. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Apel, that we have a proviso to Ordinance 8, Section 8.23(C), "This requirement shall not apply to three-season porches, green houses or solariums provided they meet the Uniform Building Code and are approved by the Building Department." DISCUSSION: The Commission debated whether similar porch structures should be included in the amendment. It was then decided to leave the exception to the three items noted and address it again if something else comes up in the future. Motion carried on as-Yes, 2-Absent (Pease, Putnam) vote. This will be heard by the City Council on February IS, 1994. OTHER BUSINESS ) Mus1 Expansion Request - Mr. Carlberg reported the Metropolitan Council co~~tee of the Whole will be recommending approval of the City's 235- acre MU~ expansion. The Metropolitan Council will be acting on it on January 2~ 1994. .... Screening a;'''"'5.J!perAmerica Site - Mr. Carlberg explained Staff has contacted the ~ills of Bunker Lake group and SuperAmerica representatives reg~ing the agreement reached for screening the site. Both parties were of e understanding there would be additional tree plantings at this time b t no fencing, and the monument sign would be at ground level. It was also~ir understanding that when the property to the north of the store is developed, screening and fencing would be done then. They are starting the preltminary plat process now, and Staff will be looking at each lot to be sure'the screening requirements are met. At this time he agreed that fencing ~ld not be needed because of the existing vegetation and the distance of....t~e building from the border of residents. ' '.... "'- MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Peek, that we allo~~SuperAmerica, pursuant to Section 8.03B, relief from the requirement of berm or fence because they are doing additional plantings and because they have reached an agreement with the people who are close by in the Hills of Bunker Lake for this. Also, that as the northern property is developed, each separate parcel will again be reviewed according to the ordinances. Motion carried on as-Yes, 2-Absent (Pease, Putnam) vote. / Newly Appointed Chairperson - Mr. Carlberg reported the City Council has appointed Commissioner Squires as the Chairperson for this coming yeaF and Commissioner Peek as Acting Chair. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION January 25, 1994 I AGENDA ITEM 5. Discussion Amend Ord. No.8 Sections 4.04(C) & 8.23(C) DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning APPROVED FOR AGENDA David L. Carlberg City Planner .y~ BY: REQUEST The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review and discuss the proposed amendments to Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance, Section 4.04, Lot provisions and Section 8.23, Residential Building Standards. The amendment to Section 4.03, Non-conforming Uses and Structures will be discussed at a later date in conjunction with amendments to Ordinance No. 44, Junkyards. REVIEW Section 4.04, Lot provisions The proposed amendment to Section 4.04(C) will require an access drive, built to City Standards as specified in Ordinance No. 17, when the principal structure is more than 150 feet from the street or thoroughfare. This Section currently requires an access drive meeting City Standards when the principal structure is more than 300 feet from a street or thoroughfare. The amendment is not retroactive. Section 8.23, Residential Building Standards Section 8.23(C) requires single family dwellings other than earth sheltered homes to have at least a 4/12 roof pitch and be covered with shingles or tiles. The proposed amendment would remove this requirement from Section 8.23. Attached are the proposed amendments to Sections 4.04 and 8.23 for Commission review and approval. Also attached please find a letter from David Almgren, Building Official supporting the 4/12 roof pitch requirement. Mr. Almgren will be present at the meeting. "?--. ,- 'J 1- ,'., \--: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA 'PI ::' It" --.: / : L .../ ~\ I~ , I ORD NO. 8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No.8, Section 4.04 is hereby amended as follows: Section 4.04(C) An access drive to every principal building shall be provided and constructed according to the minimum standards of the City of Andover as specified in Ordinance No. 17, An Ordinance Establishing Mlnimum Elevations and Standards for Building and Driveway Construction when such building is tRree-R~Reree-{eet- +~GGL+ one hundred fifty feet (150') or more from a thoroughfare or street. Section 8.23 (C-G) , ) +e+ SiR~~e-fami~y-ewe~~iR~5-etRer-tRaR-a~~reYee-eartR-5Re~ter ee-Reme5-5Ra~~-RaYe-at-~ea5t-a-4r;~-ree{-~~teR-aRe-5Ra;;-se-eeyere e-w~tR-sR~R~;eS-aRe-t~;e5~ +B+(C) All single family dwellings shall have roof overhangs whi~extend a minimum of one (1') foot from all the walls of the structure unless the style of the house dictates otherwise and said plan is approved by the Building Official prior to any permits being granted. +E+(D) All single family structures must be built in conformance with Minnesota Statute 327.31 to 327.35 or the Uniform Building Code as adopted in the State of Minnesota. +F+(E) Any metal siding upon single family residential structures sharr-have horizontal edges and overlapping sections no wider than twelve (12") inches. Sheet metal siding shall not be permitted in such districts. +6+(F) All exterior construction, including finish and the final graaIng shall be completed in accordance with plans and specifications within one (1) year following the date of permit issuance. All existing buildings not meeting the provisions of this Ordinance shall comply within one (1) year following adoption of this Ordinance. ) , ) '\ ) '\ ) Page Two Amendment Ordinance No. 8 March 2, 1994 All other sections of the zoning Ordinance shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this of , 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. MCKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk day CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA t-O. SECTION Staff, Committee, Commission ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Building Department APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t-O. Amendment to Ordinance No. 17, Driveway Standards David Almgren Building Official BY: fe,. {#- REQUEST The City Council is asked to approve the attached amendment to Ordinance No. 17, Driveway Standards. Said amendment will set minimum standards for driveways in excess of one hundred fifty (150') feet in length from the principal structure. \ ; This amendment is being recommended for approval in conjunction with the amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.04, Lot provisions on the agenda this evening. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ I TO: \ I . / /~<J/9~ 4 :/2- I?o;V -./ /~,~~ ~ /9%~ w~ ~~6~ /d~b ~~~~~,~ (.~~-! ~ 7. -d=fb~ ~ ~; ~ f ~;:::::;E-i3 ~ ~ ~ -y ~ ~- _t'~~_~.~ ... ~ ~/;:~~~ .. ~.~?~ 7fdt-~ ~ " ~.~ Z; ~~~_. .4J~ . ~..6~ -.. ~ ~ :;ra ~y~': --~ Z/'".~ ~ ~ . C::r:::d.-/ ~ ~<<'~.;;:;~ ~ ~ ad. . A-",.'/--~f? ~ i ad~ U (-';Z.-"- ~ cf Jl.~/L~ u~) ~ ~ ~ ~ z} .. a, 4,'/2- ~ ~, ~~~ ~~4~ ~~ ~~~ . ~~4/'/L :{::,:~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. _/'e'~ ., ~~ 5~~.~ ~ ~ a:::cs~~~ aJ~~~~.;4) ~~7~A'rk ~~~~/97Z-~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ 4./z..A7-~- ~ ~fi~('J~'i . .~~~ ~ ~~ ~-rtr-~ , . / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA -.J ORDINANCE NO. 17C AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 17, ESTABLISHING MINIMUM ELEVATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR BUILDING AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION. The City Council of the City of Andover, Minnesota does hereby ordain: Ordinance No. 17 is amended as follows: SECTION 4. SURFACING. All driveways shall be surfaced with a sufficient amount of erosion resistance material so that driveway surfaces will remain intact during normal usage and weather conditions. '\ ) ALL OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL REMAIN AS WRITTEN AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. Adopted by the Andover City Council this 15th day of February, 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. McKelvey, Mayor ATTEST: victoria Volk, City Clerk ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA t\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA staff, Committee, Commission ITEM t\O. woodland Crk-3rd street Names Building David Almgren ~ BY: ~ It has been brought to our attention by the Deputy Sheriff that in Woodland Creek 3rd Addition, there is an intersection at the entrance to this plat called Ivywood Street NW and Heather Street NW. On the weekend of January 24, 1994, there was an incident at this location and was called in as the intersection of Ivywood street and Heather street. Unknown to the deputy, and we did not realize at the time, we had another intersection with the same names in the Green Acres plat just to the north of Woodland Creek- Third Addition. \ , ) Therefore, we recommend changing the street identification in Woodland Creek 3rd Addition at the location of Lot 2 and 3, Block 2 to 138th Lane NW as shown on the attached map. There are no houses on these lots that would be affected with the address change. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ ) TO: 9\ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 . J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, January 25, 1994 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to discuss and possibly amend the following Sections of Ordinance No.8, the zoning Ordinance. Section 4.03 Non-Conforming Uses and Structures , , / Said amendment would allow the auto recycling yards to construct commercial buildings for the removal and temporary storage of fluids and other environmentally hazardous materials from junked vehicles. In addition, other commercial buildings may be constructed for the storage of materials removed from junked vehicles if meeting the provisions or conditions of the proposed amendment. Section 4.04 Lot provisions Said amendment would require an access drive, built to City Standards as specified in Ordinance No. 17, when the principal structure is more than 150' from the street or thoroughfare. Section 8.23 Building Standards Said amendment would remove the requirement of a 4/12 roof pitch. All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. ,)~~ /.JZ, V~ctor~a Volk, City Clerk Publication dates: January 14, 1994 January 21, 1994 J Andover Minutes Page 6 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - January 11, 1994 \ J / / // PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: REZONING - R-4 AND LB TO GB, SECTION 34, CITY OF ANDOVER . / 8:22 p.m. ~r. Carlb7rg briefly reviewed.t?e reque~~o rezone property from R-4, S~ngle Fam~ly Urban, and LB, L~m~ted BU9~ness, to GB, General Business. That property is generally locatpd south of the Waste Disposal Engineering site, west of Hanson Bou evard NW, north of Bunker Lake Boulevard NW and east of Red Oaks Mano 4th and 6th Additions. At the December 14, 1993, meeting, Staff was directed to contact the DNR and Coon Creek Watershed District to det mine why they objected to the rezoning. Letters have been received f om both agencies explaining they have no objection to the rezonings. lso, Mr. Haas has prepared a memo addressing the storm water issue i the area. Mr. Carlberg continued, the Staff is recommending that en ire area be zoned as one district to allow the greatest flexibility 0 uses for a commercial park and to have large commercial lots to deve p. , \ ) The Commission discussion w s that there is only a small area zoned LB, that it would not be go tl planning to sandwich an R-4 residential housing zone between th commercial parcels, that it is in the City's best interest to provi a uniform zone for that entire area, and that the proposed Compre nsive Plan calls for this area to be zoned commercial. Mr. rlberg reviewed the ordinances which requires screening between e GB and residential areas and the protection of the wetlands. He als noted that the ordinances do not allow any new auto recycling busin ses in the City. MOTION by Ap , Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing. Motion carr. d on a 6-Yes, I-Absent (Pease) vote. Peek, Seconded by Jovanovich, that the Andover Planning and omm~ssion forward to the City Council the attached draft Resol ion with the recommendation for approval and change the date of ado ion at the bottom of the Resolution to the applicable date. Motion ried on a 6-Yes, I-Absent (Pease) vote. The item will be placed on e February 1, 1994, City Council agenda. 8:37 p.m. DISCUSSION - AMEND ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 8.23, RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STANDARDS, REGARDING 4/12 ROOF PITCH Mr. Carlberg reviewed the background of an application for a building permit from Patio Enclosures, Inc., to build a three-season porch for a homeowner. The permit was not issued because the roof pitch did not meet the minimum requirement of a 4/12 roof pitch. He asked that the Commission determine whether to amend the ordinance by excluding three- season porches, greenhouses, etc., from the 4/12 roof pitch; leave the ordinance as written and issue variances; or uphold the ordinance as written. / Commissioner Apel recalled the 4/12 roof pitch provision was adopted when there were concerns with mobile or manufactured homes in the City. That ordinance was amended with regard to the size of the eaves when the Andover Planning and zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 11, 1994 Page 8 \ J (Discussion - Amend Ordinance 8, Seciton 8.23, 4/12 Roof Pitch, Cont.) to deprive the citizens of Andover the ability to install such rooms yet force tliem to go to the most expensive style to meet the pitch requirement. One suggestion was to allow a deviation from the roof pitch if approved by the Building Official when given the correct documentation and drawings for the specific projects. Mr. Boos - brought a few photos of the structure to which he intends to attach the sun room. The reason the specific design was selected was to avoid the roof creating a trap for the settling of snow. A 4/12 roof pitch in this instance would create a trap and he would have a problem. The dormers on his house are not a 4/12 pitch, alleging he would not be able to build his house under the current code. He appreciated the problem with trying to write an all-encompassing code, but they have no intent to turn the porch into a bedroom. Commissioner Putnam felt this is a good case as to why the individual situations should be reviewed by the Building Official. After further discussion, the Commission then directed Staff to prepare an amendment to Ordinance No. 8 striking the entire paragraph in Subsection (C). The result would be the Building Official would review each structure to be sure the roof pitch is in compliance with State code for snow loads, etc. Commissioner Peek suggested Subsection (B) be deleted as well. \ ) Mr. Carlberg stated he will check with the Building Official and schedule a public hearing with the proposed change. The Commission suggested he also check the requirements of other communities with regard to patio enclosures. 1'\1)\ DISCUSSION - AMEND ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4.04, LOT PROVISIONS - '0Y'STANDARDS OF ACCESS DRIVE TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING Mr. Carlberg reviewed the recommended amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.04(C), Lot Provisions, to require an access drive to every principal building when such building is over 150 feet or more from a thoroughfare or street. The current requirement is when a building is over 300 feet from a thoroughfare or street. The Safety Committee has made the recommendations because the Fire Department has a problem getting back to these buildings if the driveway is not up to standard or vegetation removed. It is a safety issue. The Commission asked if the amendment would be retroactive, as several indicated they would not support a change if it were retroactive. Mr. Carlberg felt it would be, but agreed to check with the City Attorney first. He will schedule a public hearing with the proposed change. j ') ,/ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION January 11, 1994 AGENDA ITEM 5. Discussion Amend Ord. No. 8 Section 8.23(C) DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning David L. Carlberg City planner BY: APPROVED FOR A~ BY: REQUEST The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to discuss amending Ordinance No.8, the zoning Ordinance, Section 8.23, Residential Building Standards. REVIEW The Commission is being asked to discuss amending Ordinance No.8, Section 8.23(C) due to a recent conflict encountered by City Staff . BACKGROUND The Building Department received an application for a building permit from Patio Enclosures, Inc. to build a three season porch for a homeowner. The Building Department could not issue the permit because the roof pitch did not meet the minimum requirement as defined in Section 8.23(C). Section 8.23(C) requires single family dwellings other than earth sheltered homes to have at least a 4/12 roof pitch and be covered with shingles or tiles. This provision was added to the Zoning Ordinance on July 20, 1982. In discussing the matter with David Almgren, Building Official, it has been determined that the rationale for the 4/12 roof pitch was to prohibit mobile or manufactured homes in the City as they do not meet the 4/12 roof pitch. Three season porches were not considered at that time. The Commission should determine the following: 1. Should the City amend Section 8.23(C) by excluding three season porches, greenhouses, etc. from the 4/12 roof pitch? 2. Should the City leave section 8.23(C) as written and adopted by the City and utilize the variance procedure to resolve the issue. 3. Should the City uphold Section 8.23(C) and require single family structures to have at least a 4/12 roof pitch. A representative from Patio information at the meeting. the meeting. Enclosures, Inc. will be presenting David Almgren will also be present at A public hearing will be scheduled for the January 25, 1994 meeting if requested by the Commission. ----..................r;;;; ........... V, .....__............"""" , I , 8.21 Height All buildings proposed that exceed the height limits imposed by provisions of this Ordinance shall require a Special Use Permit and shall be governed as follows: Buildings of greater height than expressly permitted by the Ordinanc~ may be permitted by Special Use Permit provided it is determined that: (1) Adequate fire protection and other safety features are provided. (2) The height and bulk of the building will not destroy a scenic or the appropriate view, will not shut off light and air from surrounding properties, or otherwise be detrimental to the public. In no event, however, shall any building occupy more than the permitted percentage of lot area as provided in this Ordinance. 8.22 Coin Operated Machines Coin operated, automatic machines dispensing food, soft drinks, and other food and materials shall be governed as follows: (A) These shall not be permitted in residential districts except as approved by the Special Use Permit as an accessory use within buildings housing the principal use and if residential it shall contain four (4) or more families. I / (B) These shall be permitted in Residential Districts by Special Use Permit only. (C) These shall be permitted as an accessory use to recreation uses in General Recreation Districts provided they are within a building, under a canopy, or otherwise protected from the elements; in no instance shall they be located within any required yards. (D) These shall be permitted accessory uses in all Business and Industrial Districts provided they are within a building or located outside the building immediately adjacent to said building protected from the elements by an eave, canopy, or other permitted structure. . --~ 8.23 Residential Building Standards All permitted residential structures in R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4 zoning districts shall meet the following design criteria: (A) All structures shall have permanent concrete or treated wood foundations which will anchor the structure, which comply with the Uniform Building Code as adopted in the State of Minnesota and which are solid for the complete circumference of the house. , I Page 89 u.a~nance NO. 0, ~ec~~on " (B) Sixty (60%) percent of a residential structure shall have a minimum width of twenty four (24') feet. Width measurement shall not take into account overhangs or other projections. Such width requirement shall be in addition to the minimum area per dwelling requirements of Section 6.02 herein. A7li(C) Single family dwellings other than approved earth ~ sheltered homes shall have at least a 4/12 roof pitch and shall be covered with shingles or tiles. (D) All single family dwellings shall have roof overhangs which extend a minimum of one (I') foot from all the walls of the structure unless the style of the house dictates otherwise and said plan is approved by the Building Official prior ~o any permits being granted. (8TT, 8-4-87) (E) All single family structures must be built in conformance with Minnesota Statute 327.31 to 327.35 or the Uniform Building Code as adopted in the State of Minnesota. ; (F) Any metal siding upon single family residential structures shall have horizontal edges and overlapping sections no wider than twelve (12ft) inches. Sheet metal siding shall not be permitted in such districts. (G) All exterior construction, including finish and the final grading shall be completed in accordance with plans and specifications within one (1) year following date of permit issuance. All existing buildings not meeting the provisions of this Ordinance shall comply within one (1) year following / adoption of this Ordinance. (8X, 3-22-84) 8.24 Junk Vehicles In All Districts: No person in charge or control of any property within the City, whether as owner, tenant, occupant, lessee or otherwise, shall allow any partially dismantled, inoperable, junked or discarded vehicle to remain on such property longer than twenty (20) days after notification by the City, unless it shall be within an enclosed garage or storage building on such property. Inoperable shall mean in capable of movement under its own power and in need of repairs. (8BBB, .5-17-88) J Page 90 ,".'.. ....... .; .. ..:7 J:. ..i...'. ~.,' (.:... O' :-0') :;()l <.D ~ ex> ..... (1\ I..' <.D " i ," " , J '-' Z oCD ~~ UI_, (501 :- ~ .... .... Ju 11)- ~It) :'~ "'Cl) ~ 9 ...1\ \ :,0 --- 3( ...-;,.' .,..' I . ~ .. ....'U, ,. r. .. ...'{) ~ ..r!-,. ... ""- :,"" " .,,.. ',,(- " ... .,.... ','.1.. " " " ) _-lv 01 /' \ "'/ .... ...... , I < '" 56- ;I\.,~ '( .<is........ l.t)....,; ~ \\ l....... ~\'\ J,j> ~... ::C1 \9"'0-:' -So 00'0s;, IE 00 2 o. 00, ~ 295.00 )-- \ \ \ I.... North Line of the of the Northwest T.32, R.24, Ana ~ I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA " STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 103 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING STREET NAME OF IVYWOOD STREET AND HEATHER STREET TO l38TH LANE N.W. BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 4 OF BLOCK 2, WOODLAND CREEK 3RD ADDITION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. The street now shown as Ivywood Street and Heather Street between Lot 1 and Lot 4 of Block 2 Woodland Creek 3rd Addition, City of Andover, is hereby renamed 138th Lane N.W. SECTION 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances of the City of Andover in conflict with this provision are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective on February 15, 1994. , , ) Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 15th day of February , 1994. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ~ ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED Finance FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. Receive Bids/1994 Equipment Certificates Do<y1 ~~~ande' Finance Director 1fI f. REQUEST The Andover City Council is requested receive the bids for the 1994 Equipment Certificates. BACKGROUND The City Council authorized the city staff and attorney to solicit bids for Council review for the 1994 capital equipment as presented at the .meeting on January 18, 1994. As the bid deadline is today, February 15th, the City Attorney will present the bids at the meeting. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ ) TO: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA f\O. SECTION HRA Meeting ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT planning APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM f\O. 1994 CDBG Projects & Budget David L. Carlberg City Planner --.-0 L.--".. c.---- w "",vue;; The Andover City Council is asked to review the following 1994 CDBG Projects and Budget including: 1. Continuation of the Andover Comprehensive Plan. 2. Grants to Public Service Agencies - the process would be similar to the 1993 process. 3. Continuation of Neighborhood Revitalization Projects. 4. Purchase of TDD machine. 1994 BUDGET The City has received the official word from JoAnn wright, Community Development Manager of the Anoka County Community Development Block Grant indicating the amount the City will receive for conducting the 1994 projects listed above. The City should receive $57,276 for 1994. There will be a deduction of $1,000 for administration costs by the County. The total below indicates this deduction. The City is requesting the following amounts to be allocated towards the 1994 projects. Comprehensive plan Public Service Pool Neighborhood Revitalization TDD $20,000 30,050 5,000 1,226 Total $56,276 MOTION BY: SECOND BY: TO: PROJECT *1 , , J PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST Anoka County Community Development Block Grant - 1994 I. PROJECT NAME Andover Comprehensive Planning II. PROJECT ACTIVITY \ ) The proposed project is the continuation of the 1989 CDBG Program and will update and improve long range planning efforts within the City. The current Andove. Comprehensive Plan was completed in 1980 and approved in 1982. It addresses few if any housing, (low and moderate income) issues. Because of the rapid growth experienced by Andover, the Comprehensive Plan should address public services and facilities. Administrative costs will be included in this project. All residents of the City of Andover will benefit from the update and improvement of the City'S Comprehensive Plan. As the City continues to grow, residents will be better served if the City has long range goals and plans with which to guide development. III. & IV. PROJECT DURATION The Comprehensive plan was projected to take three years to update, including plan preparation, public input, City approval, Metropolitan Council approval and publication. However, with recent difficulties encountered receiving Met Council approval the project will need to be continued. The City Comprehensive Plan will guide development and City improvement for the next five to seven years and if implemented properly, into the next century. V. This project would address the problems of housing, sewer and water capacity planning, parks and recreation, public facility development, commercial development and other development and growth issues. VI. The Andover City Council proposes to use $20,000 in 1994 for the continuation of the task of updating the comprehensive Plan. Total dollars spent will depend upon the resources needed to resolve the issues imposed upon the City by Met Council. / , I ~ Page Two 1994 CDBG Projects & Budget BRA Meeting February 15, 1994 Attached for Council review and approval project request forms for each project. scheduled for March 1, 1994. are the preliminary A public hearing is The Council may wish to change the projects or the amounts allocated to each project. upon approval by the County, Staff will inform the Council on the amounts allocated for each project. , I \ ~ , ) Page 2 Andover CDBG Proposal February 15, 1994 . , j VII. 1994 Planning Costs $ 20,000 VIII. Because this project will be a City-wide effort, it is impossible to determine at this time the number of households that will be served by this project. However, it is expected that the project will impact the community as a whole. IX. Andover believes that planning long range growth is vital to the proper use of resources within the city, including finances and land. As the City continues to improve long range planning efforts within the City, all residents will benefit from a better living environment. X. David L. Carlberg, City Planner is the project contact person. XII. David L. Carlberg, City Planner, Daryl Sulander, Finance Director and William G. Hawkins, City Attorney are the individuals authorized to request reimbursements for project expenses. XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE , , I July 1, 1994 - June 30, 1995 Comprehensive Water plan & Revisions to Overall Plan. ) PROJECT #2 ~ ) PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST Anoka County Community Development Block Grant - 1994 I. PROJECT NAME Andover Public Service Assistance Program II. PROJECT ACTIVITY The proposed project will continue as it did in 1993 to assist several local public service programs that serve low and moderate income families or individuals. The City will designate a portion of the CDBG funds for programs that meet CDBG criteria. An application procedure, approved by Anoka County, will be used to determine which programs receive funding. The application will be similar to the one used in 1993. All public service programs must serve low and moderate income individuals. Administrative costs will be included in this project. , ) III. & IV. PROJECT DURATION This will be an on-going project. The Andover City Council believes that programs that serve low to moderate income familieslindividuals should receive some level of funding from the CDBG funds annually. V. This project would address the problems of services for senior citizens, handicapped individuals and services for the homeless. VI. The Andover City Council proposes to use at least $30,050 in 1994 for public service programming. Total dollars spent will depend upon the number and amount of the requests received by the City. ) Page 2 Andover CDBG Proposal February 15, 1994 \ J VII. Advertising for Proposals Public Service $ 50 Amount of Public Service Funds Requested 30,000 $30,050 VIII. Because this project will be a City-wide effort, it is difficult to determine at this time the exact number of households that will be incorporated into this project. The actual figures will be determined once awards have been made and reports from subrecipients have been received. It is expected, as in past years, that a number of Andover and area households being affected. IX. Andover believes that its financial involvement in public service program funding is vital to the growth of services required for a growing community. Andover recognizes the need for programs that serve both local and regional clientele and this effort is part of the overall effort to fund public service programs throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area. X. David L. Carlberg, City Planner is the project contact person. ) XII. David L. Carlberg, City Planner, Daryl Sulander, Finance Director and William G. Hawkins, City Attorney are the individuals authorized to request reimbursements for project expenses. XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE April 1, 1994 - May 7, 1994 Receive Applications, City Council Review June 7, 1994 Funds Awarded to Public Service Programs ) PROJECT #3 J PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST Anoka County Community Development Block Grant - 1994 I. PROJECT NAME Andover Neighborhood Revitalization II. PROJECT ACTIVITY , ) The proposed project is an on-going continuation of the City's effort to clean up blighted properties. The project will include the identification of blighted properties, the acquisition of the properties, possibly the demolitionlremoval of blighted and/or substandard structures and the resale of the property for new, more energy efficient single family homes or commercial properties. Administrative costs will be included in this project. The total number of persons receiving benefit from this project is unknown at this time. These figures will be determined by the number of blighted properties identified and cleaned. Neighbors living in close proximity to the proposed acquisition sites will benefit from the removal of substandard and blighted structu.es and from the clean up of the surrounding neighborhood. III. & IV. PROJECT DURATION This is an on-going project in the City of Andover. The identification, acquisition and demolitionlremoval will continue through the duration of the project. The City will evaluate the project in the near future to determine the program's effectiveness and if the program will continue. V. This project would address the problems of neighborhood blight, substandard housing and energy efficient housing. VI. The funding for the Andover revitalization project will come from the project income from the sale of lots acquired in the past. The City is also requesting $5,000 be allocated toward the project for the 1994 fiscal year. , ) " ) \ ) , , ) Page 2 Andover CDBG Proposal February 15, 1994 VII. The cost of acquisition of the property andlor demolition of the blighted structures will be determined with the appraised value of the properties and agreed purchase prices. VIII. Because this project will be a City-wide effort, it is impossible to determine at this time the number of households that will be served by this project. IX. The acquisition of property and or demolition of blighted structures is anticipated to be a long term project for the City of Andover. The City recognizes the need to remove substandard and blighted structures from the city's housing pool and in addition, to improve the quality of housing within the City. X. David L. Carlberg, City Planner is the project contact person. XII. David L. carlberg, city Planner, Daryl Sulander, Finance Director and William G. Hawkins, City Attorney are the individuals authorized to request reimbursements for project expenses. XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE May 1, 1994 - July 1, 1994 Identification and inventory of blighted properties or substandard structures. July 1, 1994 - June 30, 1995 Property acquisition, structure demolition and removal, property resale. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Februarv 15. 1994 AGENDA tn. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Reports of Staff, Commi Cnrnrni!':!':inn!': Todd J. Haas, Engineering #' APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM tn. Schedule Work Session ~v /tJ. The City Council is requested to schedule a Special City Council Work Session to discuss the following: 1. Bunker Lake Frontage Road, Project 93-30 John Davidson of TKDA would like to discuss the ideas that have been discussed with the Andover Review Committee of the possible road alignment and the other utilities that may need , to be constructed. I 2. The Andover Review Committee is recommending the City Council to readdress the issue of grading within new developments. The building department has had some problems due to the fact that the developers in a couple of cases have not been grading the lots properly or consistent to the grading plan approved by the City. The building department is interested in having the entire plat graded and certified by the developer's engineer prior to issuing building permits. Possible dates for special meeting of the City Council: Choice #1 - Thursday, February 24, 1994 at 7:30 PM Note: This would work well with staff as staff is having an informational meeting with property owners of Hartfiels Addition at 6:45 PM to discuss the impiovements that will be made along Bluebird Street and to the east. Choice #2 - Wednesday, February 23, 1994 at 7:00 PM Choice #3 - Thursday, March 10, 1994 at 7:00 PM MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ) TO: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA tn SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED Todd J. Haas, ~y FORAGENDA Engineering Consent Agendal Non-Discussion Irem ITEM fIO. Receive Feasibility studYI Indian Meadows/93-24 ~: , D ~ 1/. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution recelvlng feasibility report and calling public hearing on improvements of streets, project 93-24 in the area of Indian Meadows. ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: , i TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA \ ) RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION RECEIVING ON IMPROVEMENTS OF PROJECT NO. 93-24 AREA. FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING STREETS INDIAN MEADOWS IN THE WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 002-94, adopted the 4th day of January , 19 94 , a Feasibility Report has been prepared by BRA for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the 15th day of February , 19 94 ; and WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be feasible for an estimated cost of $ 147,170.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for Project No. 93-24 , for the improvements. 2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property \ for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to J Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 147,170.00 3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 15th day of March , 19 94 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:15 PM and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 15th day of February 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor \ ) Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 Consent Agendal Nnn-ni~~"~-.nn Tt-pm Todd J. Haas, Engineering v .ph APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA r-n SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM r-n Receive Feasibility studYI 173rd Ln., l74th Ave. & Heather St./91-20 ~ la. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution rece~v1ng feasibility report and calling public hearing on improvements of streets, Project 91-20, in the area of 173rd Lane, l74th Avenue and Heather street east of Round Lake Boulevard. ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: 1 / TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA . ) RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS OF STREETS PROJECT NO. 91-20 IN THE AREA OF l73RD LANE, 174TH AVENUE AND HEATHER STREET EAST OF ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, pursuant to day of January , 19 prepared by BRA Resolution No. 003-94, adopted the 4th 94 , a Feasibility Report has been for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the 15th day of February , 19 94 ; and WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be feasible for an estimated cost of $ 138,235.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for Project No. 91-20 , for the improvements. , ) 2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 138,235.00 3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 15th day of March , 19 94 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:30 PM and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 15th day of February 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. McKelvey - Mayor ATTEST: \ J victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA 1'-0. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J. Haas, ~ Engineering APPROVED FOR AGENDA Consent Agendal Non-Discussion Item ITEM 1'-0. Receive Feasibility studYI pine Hills/93-l8 ~. I/~ The City Council is requested to approve the resolution rece~vlng feasibility report and calling public hearing on improvements of streets, Project 93-18 in the area of Pine Hills. \ I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ ; TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA \ / RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION RECEIVING ON IMPROVEMENTS OF PROJECT NO. 93-18 AREA. FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING STREETS PINE HILLS IN THE WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 165-93, adopted the 20th day of July , 19 93 , a Feasibility Report has been prepared by BRA for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the 15th day of February , 19 94 ; and WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be feasible for an estimated cost of $ 117,250.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for Project No. 93-18 , for the improvements. 2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 117,250.00 ) 3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 15th day of March , 19 94 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:45 PM and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 15th day of February 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor \ / Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 Consent Agendal Non-Di~cll~~inn It-pm Todd J. Haas, Engineering ~r- APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA r-.n SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM f'.O. Award Bid/93-10/superAmerica B~ 1'1. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting bids and awarding contract for the improvement of Project 93-10 for sanitary sewer, watermain and storm drain construction in the area of SuperAmerica located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and Bunker Lake Boulevard. \ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: 1 I TO: \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 93-10 FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF SUPERAMERICA LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF HANSON BLVD. AND BUNKER LAKE BLVD. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. 299-93, dated December 21, 1993 , bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows: Ro-So Contracting Old is Gold Construction Bonine Excavating $32,677.20 $33,504.00 $34,551.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate Ro-So Contracting as being the apparent low bidder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk \ to enter into a contract with Ro-So Contracting in the amount ) of $32,677.20 for construction of the improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond requirements met. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 15th day of February , 19-2i, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. McKelvey - Mayor ATTEST: \ j Victoria Volk - City Clerk ) TKDA TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED ENGINEERS' ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS 1500 PIPERJAFFRAY PlAZA .... CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA. 551 01-2140 PHONE:el21292-4;400 FA.X:lH2I2Q2.0083 January 28, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council J\ndover,M~esota RE~':'~.(;'~rrED fEB 1 1994 ell'! ." ;,I'!l~i)VER Re: Superamerica Utilities City Project 93-10 City of J\ndover, Minnesota Commission No. 10406 Dear Mayor and Council: Bids for the referenced project were received on January 28, 1994, with the following results: Contractor Amount of Bid \ ) Ro-So Contracting Old is Gold Construction Bonine Excavating Metro Utilities Penn Contracting Kadlec Excavating of Mora Northdale Construction W.B. Miller, Inc. $32,677.20 33,504.00 34,551.00 38,896.00 40,439.20 40,842.71 41,665.00 42,337.50 Engineer's Estimate $31,012.00 A complete Tabulation of Bids is attached for your information. It is recommended that a contract be awarded to the low bidder, Ro-So Contracting, in the amount of their low bid of $ 32,677.20. Sincerely yours, ~ Thomas A. Syfko, P.E. " ) / TAS:j Attachment z CIl 00": ~~~ ~O&>. ; ~ I ~ 0 CIl -.-l U E-t .1 Z U ";H<iI 5 ,t: Ocn:l: <ilU 'E-t ~ ~";I ....H HUcn :':0": cn<il 'cn t.l ~..;~ ss~ ~<fiI '\ ) / ..; E-t o CJl CIl t.l tl SID E-t HO HO~'" .:I..... 0 HI....... E-tM": ::>"'~O -.. 0 Z ~ ,J ~ a ~o H ":Jo.CIl &>.OCll H ~~a~~ ::>HHO CIlUUU ~ o o o ..... ... '" '" .... (X) C\I )< ~ ~ o t.l Z t.l &>. o cn o H p:j '0 -.-I .Q rl '" C ..-1 0> -.-I ... o c o QJ C -.-I ..... OJ ..-1 .s::: J,J c -.-I ... o ... ... QJ OJ V J,J o c V Q i< CJl Q H p:j 50 o :>: o ~ a E-t cn Z o U o .:I o '-' CIl H o .:I o ..: E-t Z o U o cn I ~ t.l E-t ~ H E-t cn <iI ..: t.l t.l Z H '-' Z t.l ~ E-t H 000000000000'00'00' 0000000000000000 oooaoU)l.l')O\OL{')oooooa 0000ll1O\N<"10f""-lI1NOlllOO O(Y')(T)r--O"Ir-iMC\lO\D r-Ir-iMo:::J'\.D , (X) rl If)N 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 OOOO(Yl('f'l(T) C)l.l')U)Or-f.-lr-i o .... (X) MO .....0 o ..... LOONOO'Q'O f'olOr-iOLf) a ........ ID 0000000000000000 OOOOOOONOOOOOOOO oo.oaO...-illl\D00000000 o c~ 0 0 M ('I"') co 0 0 M q \D r- l.l') li) 0 ...-t(TlM....tcr')C'I('I")NN'D r-tMqo "'N , , IDN 0000000000000000 OOOO<ql<ql<ql'Q'OOOOOOLl)O 000 Olf)lf) .... Olf)lf) 0......... .... '" If)lf)0 .........0 .... .... OO\DOOMO f""-<ql r-&O 0 ..... ... 0'000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000\000000000 OOOOI.l)(,O\DOOCONOlllDO O\O\OUlU'lNU")O)N'7\ r-tc-iril.O\Q M , N OON 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 Oooo.......mONOOONOO\DO oooor-tr-lC\lC\lOOo:lr-lOU) 0 ar-tr-tlt') r-tl""i riM \D M ..... CIl";";";Jo.Jo.Jo.r....o:r....o:Jo...o:..o:Jo.CIl .:It.lt.lt.l.:l.:l.::l.::lt.l.::lt.l.::lt.lt.l.::l.::l 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 rl'D\Or-tOI.C)l/')MNmr-tOrlrlOr-t &t)r-iC\lO r-t 0 ........ ..... t.l .::I o :I: ~ , Ot.l .....::1 10 0:1: ~~ o :1:..0: ~8 , ~ ~ ...lDoo ~N""M"'" c.J.... I I I Cl)IN~\O O.....r-iM ~CIlCllCJlCll CIlCJlCJlCJlCJl ..0: H Cr.. o .....: o CJl E-tlf)lf)lf)lf) Z CI)('I'lC"'l('l'lt"l... 0(1) H qo H<ilCIlX":":":": E-tr.lt.lt.lOOOQC ..o:l>:r.l CJlCJlCJlCJlE-t NE-t":O CIl H E-tE-tUUUU .::I": :>:>:>:>E-t :Q~~~&>.&>.&>."'~ O.::l":OccccO ~U(.!lUOOOOOOOOU If) UM :1::> E-t&>.":":": '" 000 t.l c CJl CJl CJl COO UUU Z;:.:>:> O&>.&>.&>. Ori(\l('f")<q'l.l')\D c-tN('I'l<q'U'l\Or--Q)O\MriMrlrlr-t1"'"i o o 0000 0000 0000 OONO aJN.....(l') NM "" o .... rl "I 0000 Ooq.o OOMO 0"" 0 "" M .... o "I N M (X) 0000 0000 0000 l.l')\.C',O 0 C)l.l')('I1C"") "I N M .... 0000 OUlU"')O If) '" N..... If) .... ....0 o M o o ID M ID 0000 0000 0000 0000 O\DN(.j M .... rl N DOCO 0000 00 ON If) .... If) 0 o M ..o:Jo.p:jCll t.l.::l.::l.::l 0000 0000 NOOM 00"" z ~i :;J~ :>~ . ..... CIl'- '-'~ Z H&>. E-tO E-tE-t HCJl r.. t.l0 E-tlf) ..; (.!lCll CIl ~j E-tU E-t"''''~ ~8t18 .., . ~.... . . ID ID riN("I)..., E-t p :I: CIl '- ..: t.l &>. &>. o U o o 0000 0000 0000 QqoQqo 'Q'\OO\O o "I "" , ID N .... 0000 0000 OOOll} 0""0 ....IDO .... o o o rl N 0000 0000 DalilO MI.l)Nqt \Dl.l')l.l')\D If) .... U")ooa Noaa \DOUlU'l Nlf)N If)lf) .... o o o o ..... 0000 0000 000\0 NOOO"l ('\O~co If) , .... 0000 0000 ODOr- MOO IDN ri Cz..<(I)~ .::It.l.::lCll 0000 0000 <q'r-ir-lCO N <'l ..... ..: ~Z l:l~::l E-tP ~UE-t i'i:<ilUlf) O(l)PM E-t ":1 CIlQE-tu ZCJlU If)t.l .::It.l CJlQOE-t CJl~~~ j ZU U OZ r..UO U '" UU ..:..: E-t t.lt.l .::1.::1 t:~ OU c c If) If) .... .... .....N('I1qt o o o (X) ID 000 000 000 000 ....If)rl "" 000 000 OON 0.... <:, rl o o If) ... M , M 000 000 Oco ,",If)0 OONN 000 000 Olf)... o N rl o o ID .... .,. , M 000 000 000 IDOO lO.....C\1 000 000 ON'" o (X) U)<Jo. .cCll.::l 000 ....00 000 1Olf) t.l E-t t.l .::I ~ UE-t ,-,f:l ~j t.lp:j t.l CIlt>:t.l t.lU t.lp:jZ AHt.l HIz.Jo. CIl QOE-t <38::1 ":~CIl rl N M : ! : oae MI'" M~~ U a u g ~ ~ u ~ I ~ "laID ~I~ : I ~ :g I : U M a U U .- lfl 00": ~~~ 40j ':i! 'l' ,0 lfl "'UE-t ..:lZU ":Ho.:I ~ ,~ Olfl:I: o.:IU 'E-t ~ ~~I HUlfl :<:0": (flo.:l , <II 0.:1 ......:Z E-o H <3e~ E-t:;J14 ) ..: E-t o <II 14 Z ZID HO ~'" o ,.... ,,: ~O ,:t..... 0 Z , ;e Z ~ oJ ~ 0 ~o H "'r..lfl "'0<11 H 14><><:;: "'E-tE-t~ DHHO lflUUU lfl 0.:1 H E-t HO ..:l.... HI E-t'" DO\ ~ o o o .... .,. 0\ 0\ .... , '" N >< ~ ~ .., o 0.:1 Z 0.:1 '" o <II o H III '0 ..j .0 .... nl .:: 'M Ol ..j " o .:: o CIJ .:: ..j .... O'l ..j .c ... a ..j " o " " CIJ O'l QJ ... o .:: CIJ o << CIl o H III "" o Z o ~ a I>: E-t Z o U !;;1 0.:1 '" ..:l H E-t ::> o I>: E-t ~ :> .0: U X 14 0.:1 Z H Z o III ~ E-t H 0000000000000000 OOOOOOlOf'OOOoooao OOOOU")U")("--OOU)O&.{')OLllOO OOOOLllMOr--Wf'\O\DlllC""-OO OO'\O'\f'l"""iqoOOCO"'l'\O NNNU')CO "I '" "'''I .... 0000000000000000 oooot"-O(y)O\OOQLllQOOO lOO'OOlllLOO ('\QNLOf"'" 0 "IN '" 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 OOOOOOOCOOOlOOO.oOO o a 0 l.f) 0 ..., 0 a 0 r-l Vl 0 ....) r- 0 0 l()("f'l(T}C'q'lLOO\U')OQ) (T)r-Ir-tNU'l "'''I ... 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 C)LllOOU'lNO O\U)(T}U')(""- 0 ....... III 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ONNOJOU")OC""-NNO\OCOOON O~~f"""OC""-Lt')co\OCX)r--af"-MOtl") LllMM\O\OM\O\OMCO N r-i\'ooqo 0000000000000000 0000,000000000000 or-r-Q)'qiI.()\OO\r-iCOO\Ocx)O\ON Ol.OlOf'NNNC\lCOmr-Nr""'-(T') ll'J U") \0 M r-I...,. "I .... lfl.o:.o:.o:r..r..r..r...o:r...o:r...o:.o:r..<II ..:l14o.:114..:l..:l..:l..:l14..:l14H1414..:l..:l 0000000000000000 00,00000000000000 ......\O\01""'IOlOl.t)("f'lC\lO\MOr-l.-tOr-l lOl""""INO r-I <:) .... '" .... , 00.:1 ......:l 10 o:r::,,: ~: .o:~ H Q 00 f&1..................~CI) "'UUHZ ~:>:>~~ "'I':E-t:& 141414<11 Ulfl<ll I': IllH "'14 "':>E-tE-t0~ ":I':":r..14 ~~~ <II Z 2~ E-t<ll .0: ~~ Olfl UUUr..H Z:>:>:> :> 0"'''' "'U 0.:1 14..:l C I: c: c: tlI '-l IDIDIDCOlflE-t III III III U"'CO)CO) :> '" 1':1':1': QQQ <II"'''' OMNMoo::IIlO\O rlNM<qtU')\Df"'ooCOO\r-innnMr-iM OOOOC'O\ OtlltllONN OnM€' "I "lIDO "''''''' "I .... "I III 0000\0\0\0\00 OI./')I./')ll')('I')(Tl('l')(Y}O Ill.... 0 "I .... , "I , CO) , , "'''1 .... 0.:1 ~ o ~ - '" ~N'" 14....1 lfllN 0.... E-tllllllllllll Z U)Pl(T'l(T'lM... Olfl H '" H14lfl:<e>:I':I':'" E-t14o.:1o.:1QOQQQ ~~f;lO"'lfl"'<II~ H E-tE-tUUUU ..:l": :>:>:>:>E-t..: H.o:II1Z"''''''''''lfll': 1Il14::>Z ZE-t O..:l":OccccOX ~U(!JUCOCOCOCOU14 o "I 0000 0000 '" III o o '" 0000 I./') 00 0 0 OCONN "'.... 0000 01.t)00 III '" "IN III .... III 0 o "I o o co Co) CO) 0000 0000 0000 000:>0 OlD '" , 0\ "I '" .... 0000 0000 00 ON III .... NO o '" o o .... III 0\ 0000 0000 oqoOO\O ONNO r"'-ll)M\O '" "I "I.... 0000 0000 (\10\('1")\0 ll'l.... 0 CO) ID .... .o:r..llllfl 14..:l..:l..:l 0000 DODO NOOM '" .. Z H 14~ :>0.:1 ~E-t :>:i 140 E-tlll .0: (!Jlfl lfl ?!j E-tU E-t'" ~8 c .... lfl...... (!J~ Z H'" E-t0 E-tE-t Hlfl r.. ",:i! HO uu .., c :&.... c c ID ID r-iNMoqo E-t ::> :r:: lfl ...... I': 0.:1 '" '" o U o o 0000 0000 o '" '" III 000000 <X) C\I 000 I.ll\ONO , , .... .... 0000 lOCOI./') oqoooCX) "1"10 IDN .... o o o <Xl 0\ 0000 0000 00000 \QlllQ\O O\LllO\€' '" DODO 0000 000\0 "'1ll0 ll'l0\ o o o ll'l 0\ 0000 0000 COO'\.-I\O <qO.-IO'\O\ l.O<qOOOJ , .... - '" 0000 0000 C'O\.-I€' "1....0\ "'0 .... r...o:<IIr.. ..:l14..:l<ll 0000 0000 'oq'rlMOO "I "I .... I': 0.:1 ~Z ~2f;l E-t::> UE-t o.:IUIll lflD'" 1>:1 E-tU <IIU ~ o E-< lflQ Z III 14 lflQ ~~ r.. ..:lo.:l OE-t ~f;l ZU OZ UO U '" UUE-t 1>:1>:0.:10.:1 ..:l..:l c C E-t 111 Illlll::>.o: .......OU nN('I')'oq' o o 000 o III III Ill........ IDa", '" .... ID 0\ '" CO) .... o III III 0....,... ON.... ll'l '" .... o o 000 000 000 Illll'llll 0........ .... :0 .... .... '" 000 000 0"'", o III .... o o 000 000 '" III o '" 000 0\ III III ........"1 .... 000 000 0"'1ll o .... .... U><r.. .o:lfl..:l 000 .... 00 000 III ll'l 0.:1 E-t 14 ..:l ~ UE-t (!Jf:j ~j 14 III 14 <111>:0.:1 WU lOZ HW r..r.. E-t ..:l H lfl 14 Q H '" ~Q 08 I':~ ....NCO) :1: =p ~I~ u '" ~ U o o o 0\ III , .... o o .... ll'l III '" CO) Z CIl OQO: ~~~ ~~o. J' 0 J, ,H U E-< ~;;~ 5 ,t: QCIl:I: t.:lU 'E-< ~ g:s, HUCIl :':00:: CIlt.:l , CIl t.:l ~~;; agg E-<~t.:l '\ / ~ 8 o CIl CIl r.l ~ EIO 8 HO HO;:;:.,. .::I... 0 H. ... rl 8MI': ::>"'~O ~80Z U ".Q ... )Z !'" ~ r.. ~ "'OCll H ~ ~a: ~ ::>HHO UlUUU III .... ..c: .., c ../ I< o I< I< CIl III CIl .., o c CIl Q " rn Q H III 50. o 6 H f< ~ a ~ o o o ... .,. '" '" ... a) (\/ ~ ~ Q ~ t.:l '" o CIl o H III '0. .... .Q ... nl C .... Ol .... I< o C o CIl c .... ... " 0000000000000000 oooooOU"Jooooooooo OOOOL()II)f'~OlOLOOll)Ll)OO DOOOCTlU')Mll)O\Dr---r-fC'aJl.t')O l.t)('\')("I"lLl)ll)NqoNMf' MC")MqoOO U Z H a) '-<N I-N 0:: t.:l .::I .::I H ;:;: <II ~ 0000000000000000 OOQOO'lOU"lOOOOOOOl/lO 0\.0"""""""000 Orlrlr-trlLO '" ... .-< ... 000 0"'", '" a) LOU1...-iU')U)'Q'Q mf'Mt'QJ 0 MM a) 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 OOOOOU1I.OO'\QOOOOOQU) OOOO'.OO'\NO'\OM!J"':NLl)u"')O\o L()\D\'oOO'l<qOaJNC\ltD r-iriNf""i('l"') 8 CIl Z o U t.:l ~ 5l 8 I': o Z (\/ ....,. M(\/ ... 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000 000 "'...... (\/ OMM O(T)(T) o ... MMO (T)MO ... ... OONOOr-illl f'U')"U")1ll l.O ...(\/ M ~ ~ , :> .0: () X t.:l U t.:l .::I ~ OOOOOU')I./')..-iOOOOOOOO OOOOU")U1Nr--OOor-...oooo OOOOll)Q)<q"C"')OOlOllloaoo O<X)OOQCONr-iMO\Dt'OOU')u)QO O...,.qoOC\lql['tOqtC\l NNM\D(\I , (\/ ....,. , , , ...(\/... ... OOOOr""',.....r--C'OOor--aooo OOOOUlU1Ul100001ll0000 0000 aQ)Q)O o 0 N ... OJOJQ:JQ)Q NNC\lNO (\/ ... OU1OJOD\Da qof'C\lU')U') 0 r-I N('t") N ... CIl~.c.cr..r..r..r...cr...cr...c.cr..CIl .::I t.:l r.l r.l.::l ,l.::l.::l t.:l.::l t.:l.::l r.l t.:l.::l.::l 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 M\D\DrlOlf)U")MNO\r-fOnriO..... U")r-{C\lO r-l a ....,. ... t.:l .::I o :I: ~ o iii ....::1 10 0:<:0:: ~: ~~ H 0111 M - , .,. 10 ...... I I (\/.,. ...... r.l , .::I a)0 ~~ 00 1iI".::ICIl "'UUHZ ~::>:>::l~ 0::0::f<:!; t.:lr.lIilCll UCIlCll 0: H l>:r.l :>880~ 0::0::0::r..t.:l I':r.lr.lf-l CIl QCIl:>:>Z (I) OZ "''''I/lH~ U(T}(T}(T}8C1l :> ~ "'0::l>:0::~~ QQQ Z c: CI') CI) CI) H a) OCll UUUr..H Z::>::>::> :> 00. 0. "'U iii 1iI.::I C c: ceo.. CiI \O\O\O<OCI')E-t ~(\/ iii... CIlI o ~CIlCllCllCll CIlCllCllCllCll .0:.,. H Or.. o lj 8 H f<l/ll/lllll/l (()C"'JC"l(T'JM.. en H """:x: IiICIlXO:O:O:O: 8 :;l::Jr.ltltHltl~g; !-to::O (l)Q 8f<UUUU :>:>:>:>8~ 0."'0.0.(1)0: Z8 CI:I:I:O>< O)(X)OOCOUr&I Z o H 8 ~ N H ~~<IlZ <Ilr.lPZ 0.::10:0 :!;U~U DriNM<ql\O\O riNM<q'I/l\Of"'-Q)O\rirlr-frlrlt""iri , ... " o '" 0000 0000 0000 OQ<qll.ll \Oa) N "'... ... .-< .,. '" \0 N 0000 QU)oo 0(\/ 0(\/ a) (\/ o o 0000 0000 0000 aqocoU) lOa) (\/ M... .,. ...... ... a) (\/ 0000 ClOOO QC")Na 0(\/ '" a) (\/ ... ... I- 0000 0000 (\/ (\/ l"'l , l- N 0000 0000 CONOl , . IIlN 0000 0000 OtOU10 ON 0 '" '" (\/ .cr..IIlCll t.:l.::l.::l.::l 0000 Coca NOOM a).,. Z H ~S ~8 :>:2 8 P :r: CIl , 0:: t.:l 0. '" o U ~ ... CEl0Cl)........ 8"'~~ ~ Z (!)CI)Ha.. (1)80 :'.!jt:~ 8Ur.. 8",0. ~~ ~ ~ \0 \0 ~ HO UU ~~ :1:... rlN(T}qo o 0000 a 0000 o <qOON 0\ 'Dl.llOU') \.0 COOOM , a) MCTlrl "'0 '" N ... 0000 0000 1..000m M",O 00 '-<M a 0000 o 0000 o Noaqo r-- MOOO r- r--r-Ot"l") '" NN 0000 l./')ooo 00000 MaOri 1-0 (\/ o 0000 o 0000 o DODO o NUlOO ~ ("('-0\0 , a) ...... 0000 0001.{') 00 ON MU'lOr-f 1-0 ... r...cCllr.. .::It.:l.::lCfl 0000 0000 <q'r-irlCO (\/ (\/ ... 0:: iii ~Z ~2:;l 8::> U8 IiIU", (I) PM 0::, !-tU CIlU ~ o 8 CIlg "'r.l .::I iii CIlQ08 CIl:;l~:;l j...:ZU Uo-10Z r..UO '" U UU8 0:: 0:: iii iii .::1.::1 ~~~~ rlrlOU rlNC")'lOI' o 000 o COo \0 000 \0 voo o Q)rir-f , \0 000 000 O(\/N o N .-< a 000 o 000 \0 0\00 M l.Il('\.,JLl) ,.... C"'-rir-t '" ... 000 0"'0 O(\/M o '" N o 000 o 000 o OIJ")IJ") ,.... u"lt'--N o DMM .,. ... 000 0"'", OM(\/ o '" .-< U><r.. ~CIl.::l 000 1-00 000 "'''' iii 8 iii .::I ~ U8 ~lj ~j iii <II iii CIlO::IiI t.:lU IiIQ:lZ QHt.:l Hr..r.. Cfl ~Q8 08~ O::~CIl ",(\/M ~ ~ ~ I .-< ~ /I /I , g 1/;5 ~!~ ~F :I~ ;Y) : '" "'/10 II .,. /I II CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA t-.O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J. Haas, ~ Engineering ..y>" APPROVED FOR AGENDA Consent Agendal Nnnuni<:l'"l1<:",inn Tt-"m ITEM t-.O. Solicit Quotes/Lighting for City Hall Park Complex/94-1 )9t/ /f. The City Council is requested to authorize City Staff to proceed to seek quotes for preparing to solicit plans and specifications to light one (1) softball field and one (1) soccer field with an alternate quote to do four (4) fields (three (3) softball and one (1) soccer). The Park and Recreation Commission has discussed this lighting at City Hall park Complex over the past six months and is ) recommending the City Council to proceed. Attached is a letter from Musco Lighting, Inc. as to the recommendation of the materials that would be installed. It would be in the best interest of the City to include other lighting manufacturers that would have a comparable lighting system. The cost for the preparation of plans and specifications would come from Park Dedication Funds. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: '. ) TO: Q ..;;1'. .;! -JAfI-2S":-'94 ruE li:59 iD:-PEACH ASSOCIATES m: TEL t-lQ:612 434 9358 1i05? P03 January 18, 19~ Craig Gallop ~ Spartll -x.ohnalolY, Inc. "- "'- p.o. Box 27231 Gold=n YCllIq. MN 55427 ~ '\ - . , David O'Toole 13429 Jonquil St. N.W. Andover, Minnesota 55304 ReI Lighting Of Softball and Soccer Fields. D.ar tJavid, . ) It was nice meeting again with you aijd with Frank to review the information on lighting of the fields and to view the soccer field. As discussed, we would use the wood poles in conjunction with the }~SCO sportscluster-2 lighting system and remote the oalla~ts to a 15' level on the poles. The sportscluster-2 is a factory assembled, factory wired and factory aimed lighting system which could be in- stalled with volunteer help. Because the system is completely assembled and shipped ready for installation, the lighting is guarantee to be correet on the field. Even the pole mounting hardware is supplied as part of the system. }!ueCO backs the complete lighting system, including the factory aiming of the lights, for 5 years. All electrical components including ballasts, capacitors and fusing will be remoted to the lower portion Of the pole. This will enaole maintenance personnel to reach the electrical equipment from a step ladder Bhoul~ a fuse go out or should any equipment need to be checked. We would 1isht the softball tiel~s to 30 footcandles infield ~nd 20 footcandles outfield maintained lighting. The cost including supervision of installation and remote electrical components is $12,327 per field, The soccer field will be lit to 20 rootcandles using three or four poles on each side of the field. The cost for the lighting system with remote electrical components and supervision 1s also $12,327. Please feel free to call it you have any questions. ! ~lso strOngl~ recommend the use of Wunderlich-~{alec Engineering to size the wiring and do a layout for the electricians. This will ensure that the VOltage drop is not greater then 3% throughout the system and that the wire will be sized for correct operation of the lighting system. ~ ) ~ \~~o~ LIGHTING. INC. "-c ,'-'..... ...........,..- ~.-..-,., ......,......,! f,.......,'-'.....~Ol't.-.... ~l.'..... IL...L... 1"..1''-'..'::' ............., ;;;'-I...JO H>;;;,.J f rLl.L ) FAX TRANSMISSION " PEACH ASSOCIATES, INC. Fax (612) 434-93sB Voice (612 434-9358 Date: January 25, 1994 Number of ~ages: lfaaee (ineludina this pace) From: Marcie Peach Recording Secretary, Park Board To: 'I'odd Haas Assistant City Enqineer City of Andover FAX number: Subject: The Park Board wante to cret croincr on the installation of li9hts in the City Hall Park Complex. They'd like to cret the . '\ Boecs done (see 8uacrestion of Wunderlich-Malec Enaineerino in __) Gallon's letter\ and to go out for bids for 2 fields (one softball and one soccer) with an alternate to do 4 fields at once (three softball and one soccer). Assumincr this needs Council llooroval firat. 'I'hanks Marcie ) ~ ~iW '. " J ./ " Andover Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes -January 20, 1994 page 2 FOX WOODS SKBTCH PLAN The Commi~~ion reviewed the sketch plan of the propoeed Fox Woods plat being developed by Gorham Builders. It consists of 73 single-family urban lots and is located south of Oak Bluff. Because of the large park in Oak Bluff which would abut this plat, the Commission generally agreed to accept cash in lieu of land for park dedication. CITY HALL PARK COHPLEX, LIGHTING Commissioner O'Toole explained Craig Gallop, Musco Lighting, and Frank Stone, Public Works Superintendent, viewed the fields at the City Hall complex with regard to the lighting of the softball and soccer fields. MuSCO has quoted a price of $12,327 per field. The recommendation is that Ballfield 3 be lighted rather than Field 1 because of the power lines. Because the hope is to have the lights installed for the summer season, he asked what needs to be done next to continue the process. It taKes 30 days from the order date to receive the fixtures. The intent is to use as much volunteer help as possible to reduce the cost. Mr. Gallop also recommended specifications be done for the size of wiring and layout to ensure the voltage drop is not greater than 3 percent , throughout the .yatem. ) HOTION by Kieffer, Seconded by Paulson, to investigate this to the amount not to exceed $25,000. Ask the council for their approval; and to light one softball and one soccer field. DISCUSSION: It was suggested it rn~y be more economical to do all four fields at one time. Commissioner O'Toole felt the spec sheet and wire sizing could be done by, an electrical engineer for $1,000 to $1,500. After further discussion, it was agreed to bid two fields with an alternative for doing all four if that is what the Commission chooses after receiving the bids. Commissioner Kieffer Changed the Motion to: Go out for bids to include the lighting of one soccer field and one softball field with an alternate bid of lighting three ball fields and one soccer field. Also for us to not exceed $2,000 to get the specs drawn up, recommending that they be done by Wunderlick-Malec Engineering. Second Stands, Motion carried on a 6-Yes, l-Absent (Anderson) vote. CHAIRPBRSON'S REPORT \ ) Recognition of p~st-Chaperson Jeff Kieffer - Chairperson CeLarco thanked Commissioner Kieffer for serving as Chair of the Commisaion for the past three years. The Commission also welcomed Cave Erickson as Ii new member. Current Budget - Chairperson CeLarco asked that they be provided with an updated budget for the next meeting. @ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Februarv 15. 1994 AGENDA 1\0. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Consent Agendal 1\T"T'I..n; :; nn Tt-..m Todd J. Haas, Engineering ~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 1\0. Declare Cost, Order Assessment Roll;Woodland Pond ~~ /~. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm drain for Project 93-14, Woodland Pond. ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: , j TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. \ ) MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND STORM DRAIN , FOR PROJECT NO. 93-14 WOODLAND POND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $ 56,541.99, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 17,862.79 and work previously done amount to $ 28,403.48 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 102,808.26 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 102,808.26 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the 15th day of April 1995, and shall \ bear interest at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum from the J date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 15th day of February, 1994 with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER . ) ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk January 6, 1994 / " ) ANDOVER SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS " rROJE:CT NAME Woodland Pond PROJECT NO.: 93-14 FEASIBILITY ~TUDY: Date 8-3-93 Amount $ 57..460.00 CONTRACT AWARD: Da~e 9-7-93 {bv Chanqe Order ~o 93-21 FINAL CONSTRUCTION COST Amount S 56.720.65, $ 56.541 99 Engineering: $ Aerial Mapping (1% of street) $ Drainage Plan (0.3% of street/storm) $ Administration (3%) $ Assessing (1%) $ Bonding (0.5%) $ Legal & Easement $ Advertising $ Construction Testing $ Other: Public Works/Co Recorder $ Construction Interest ( 4 %) $ From 8/93 to 12/93 Months: 4 13.205.02 178 11 69 14 1. 696 26 565 42 282 71 1.032 75 79 49 753 89 TOTAL EXPENSES (% of Final Contract Cost = 1.3159208 + $ 17.862 79 'TOTAL CONDE~mATION COSTS '. J TOTAL PROJECT COST + $ 0 00 $ 74.404.78 Trunk Source and Storaoe: Watermain: Connection Charge Area Charge Previous Lateral Charge Sanitary Sewer: Connection Charge Area Charge Previous Lateral Charge Sanitary Sewer Prevo Paid Storm Sewer: Prev.Area Charge $ 12.375 00 $ 4.525.68 $ 6.226 00 $-2., 964. SO $ 4.251.00 $ 6.226.00 (-$ 11. 013 521 $ 2.848 82 (~Units @ $1.125 (~Acres @ $1. 038 (~LF @ $ 22.00 (---11-Units @ $269.50 (~Acres @ $975.00 L.2.B.LLF @ $ 22 00 (4 36 Acres @ $653 40 +$ 28.403 48 -$ N/A TOTAL TRUNK SOURCE AND STORAGE City Share: Work Previously Done: $ Subtotal $ TOTAL TO B~ ASS~SS~D $ 102.808 26 ~1.02.._8.o 6...2Ji. $ 9, 346.21 /Lot 11 Lots / 10474 CITY OF ANDOVER r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON DATE February 15, 1994 AGENDA t\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J. Haas, Enginee~f- APPROVED FOR AGENDA Consent Agendal Non-Discussion Item ITEM 1\0. Accept Feasibility Report/Woodland Creek 4th Addn./93-3l Bt:r2 . U~( 17 The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting feasibility report, waiving public hearing, ordering improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications for the improvement of Project 93-31 for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm drain construction in the area of Woodland Creek 4th Addition. ) '. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ ) TO: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA , ~ RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 93-31 FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND STORM DRAIN IN THE FOLLOWING AREA WOODLAND CREEK 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 4th day of January 19 94 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by presented to the Council on the 15th day of February TKDA and , 19~; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $ 339,000.00 ) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated total cost of improvements of $ 339,000.00 , waive the Public Hearing and order improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City require the developer to escrow the sum of $ payments to be made prior to commencement of specifications. Council to hereby 22,000.00 with such work on the plans and MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 15th day of February, 19-2i, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: \ j J. E. McKelvey - Mayor victoria volk - City Clerk , '\ , _./ " , / \ ) December 27, 1993 Mr. Todd Haas City Engineer city of Andover 1685 N.W. Crosstown Andover, Minnesota Boulevard 55304 RE: PROPOSED WOODLAND CREEK FOURTH ADDITION Dear Mr. Haas, Woodland Development does hereby petition for improvements by the construction of a water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and streets with concrete curb and gutter with the cost of these improvements to be assessed against the benefitting property which is described as Woodland Creek Fourth Addition. Set petition is unanimous and a public hearing may be waived. We request that the feasibility report be prepared as soon as possible. I have enclosed a check for $1,000 for the feasibility report expense. We understand if we choose to continue with the project, the $1,000 will be credited towards the improvement escrows. ~ncer.O'lm ~. Westlund Vice President BDW:jah Enclosure . 830 West Main Street !I of pegea ..-z..,. Dept. Fuf Anoka, Minnesota 55303 (612) 427-7500 FAX: (612) 427-0192 ;o,~ SEC~~ >DU-O~CO~~i..ion. ~ &f. cO~~itteeSr ,. sta'"' ~t \1E-tA ."". " elf\' of M~VO"EIt co~C\~ fr-..ct\o~ Jl.lI<1ul'StfOR . 'Ob,,,,'1 1" 199' O~1E - OE-~ ,..f\1'tAE-t(t' O~\G\~"'1\~G . p..O~inist"Ca:/n ~lanoe"C Da"C~l ~~O~iniSt"CatO"C p..ctl.ng ~ -- ~~~~O'lE-O fO~ ,..GE-~O~ st,AY ~lJO l'c aoe to ~~b 1. S ste~ ~"tbO,i'O O\;\ing <olO~bono 1 \'lo"C~s B~l. l I .ze tne ~Vg"Caoing ~ to a~tno"Cl. "$QO~ . . ,0q,,0.tO" tO~. ~ C.t1 Co"nc.l ,. t010~bono .1. <bo ~nao'o'.:~o". .."ila.ng of. tne ~~bll. 000 e3Cn f.0"C .tn~s S~rOOO ~ .0' .."agotS b'~o .~t\.i c ~o ,.s. :b~';,"iO~ont. _'0 199' ~,tO' ,n~o\~~bono .1st':o'to' tbO nocoss' 1 >" a. 9 ot tbO cb'so ~,. aing tbO ,,~g't ~ tbO ,ct",l ~", 99' incl"aos "~~~~in Logona sbO' l,n 's b"agotOa:~~b\iC ~o,.s ;;t ~~1 ~,ll ,na <bo 0'0,,11 ~lO~bono lino..'o tbO ono "soa Cit1 ~,ll to' . ai'ia",l to 0 s1stO~ 1" nt,ollO' ,t ~git,l t010~bon..tinq ~o,l.n ~t o~tonsions. o;l,,~'nglt~~,,~"linos ,na st' t.o ~o,lin cont'O;;o~; ,aait.on' onnoct tbO -bO tin,l sto" 10 be to c 1ste~s, '~ <bo n~~ 't'oo\,::g," tbO 't.~o",;~o;.~:. toget.. .ce ~al.l to aooing '101. nase ag"Ce€ "$CO~~ . ot' 10,.0/~"';.tO~ to ' ~ __^ tlO ,,,tbO'i.~t.on,.. tolO~bono · co.t ot' 1 ,oco~~ona,~o tbO ."bl'C,~s~o~ ,t' ~ontb/~~"Ccnase aC ~<.< to ~~~ 1 t010~bono.' 1 tbi. 10,.0." LOgona o.g.~~o cit1 031 c,~~~ ,0 a,1. not.co. 60 ~o~tns~itno~t Venalt1 ~l. an1 tl.~e SECOtlO a'l~____ - - - tA01\otl a'l~_ 10'. - DATE: February 15, 1994 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL planning and zoning Minutes - January 25, 1994 city council Minutes - February 1, 1994 Metro olitan Waste control commission - Januar 21, 1994 Letters from Dottie Rietow, Metro olitan council - Feb. 3, 1994 Letter to Jerry windschitl - February 10, 1994 Anoka Count Sheriff's Monthl _ December, 1993 January 1994 Monthly Building Report Fire Dept. February 1994 Calendar Fire Dept. Information Ord. No. 33E Feasibility Report - Indian Meadows Feasibility Report - l73rd Ln, 174th Ave. & Heather st. Feasibility Report - pine Hills Feasibility Report - Woodland Creek 4th Addition Schedule of Bills PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. THANK YOU. 'A ~ ot, 8- (b-q4 January 21 1994 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. ~ii\1ScJl ~h 633 612 '222':8423 JAN 24 1994 CITY (jll- "l" " , ,-. '<(L'. ., 'r-. " '" ,..,.)'1-"..... , '_.r< To: City Managers: Please enclose copies of this public information meeting notice in your mayor's and city councilmember's council packets. There also are copies of the meeting notice enclosed for yourself, city engineer, or other city staff you may wish to have attend. Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer ~ o @ Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, SI. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1633 612 222-8423 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETINGS CENTRALIZATIONIDECENTRALIZATION STUDY (DRAFT FINAL REPORT) TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22 Inver Grove Heights City Hall 8150 Barbara Ave. lnver Grove Heights 7:00 - 9:00 P.M. WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 23 Mears Park Centre Council Chambers 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul 2:00 - 4:00 P.M. WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 23 Minnetonka City Hall Council Chambers 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka 7:00 - 9:00 P.M. The CentralizationlDecentralization (CID) Study is an area-wide planning study that provides overall direction for expanding and upgrading the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's (MWCC) plants and interceptor system through the year 2040. The purpose of the information meetings is to inform the public on the CID Study results and to receive public input to further develop various options. The study addresses: New population projections with a 2040 estimate of 3,264,000 (an increase of over 900,000 people). Water quality based effluent limitations. Other pending effluent standards, such as phosphorus removal. The MWCC recently forwarded to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency a preliminary draft of the C/D Study. The recommended alternatives in the preliminary study draft are: 1) to build a new regional plant in the Cottage Grove area to serve the southeastern portion of the Metro Area and; 2) to abandon the Chaska Plant and convey its flow to the Blue Lake Plant in Shakopee. Copies of the executive summary of the CID Study are available in the following county libraries: Dakota County: Westcott (in Eagan), Bumsville, Apple Valley, W. St. Paul, Hastings, and Farmington. Hennepin County: Ridgedale, Wayzata, Westonka, Eden Prairie, and Southdale. Washington County: Cottage Grove, Lake Elmo, Lakeland, Woodbury, Oakdale, and Newport, Scott County: Shakopee, Savage, Prior Lake, and Jordan. Carver County: Chaska, Chanhassen, and Waconia, Anoka County: Blaine. Ramsey County: RoseviIle and Maplewood. If you have questions about the C/O Study, please call MWCC staff member Pauline Langsdorf, at 229-2100. Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer ~ 0 . { .C}\ CITY of ANDOVER February 10, 1994 Jerry Windschitl Ashford Development Corporation 3640 - l52nd Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 Re: Property Known as Crown pointe and Crown pointe East Dear Mr. Windschitl: Attached please find responses from the Coon Creek watershed District Administrator and Engineer to my letter sent to the Coon Creek watershed District dated January 3, 1994. If you have any questions or would like to discuss the responses, feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, CITY OF ANDOVER :7~__./~ Todd J. Haas Assistant City Engineer TJH:rja Encl. cc: Tom Syfko, TKDAIActing City Engineer Mayor and City Council Pete Raatikka, Developer's Engineer f ~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 January 3".1994 Tim Kelly, District Administrator Coon Creek Watershed District 12301 Central Avenue N~ Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55434 Reference: Crown Pointe and Crown pointe East located in Section 25 & 26, 32-24 City of Andover Dear Mr. Kelly: Enclosed are minutes of the City Council meeting of December 7, 1993 regarding a sketch plan known as Crown Pointe East and the many concerns including a discussion of constructing a street between the proposed areas of Crown pointe (located between Coon Creek and Burlington Northern Railroad) and Crown Pointe ~ast (located east of Coon Creek). The City Council has expressed interest in having a street constructed between the proposed areas if possible to allow better circulation and to provide for an additional access for public safety. The City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission obviously are going to request the Coon Creek Watershed District to address any complications which may occur by proposing the street construction. We would assume the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act will apply in addition to Andover's Floodplain Ordinance. We would appreciate any comments or suggestions regarding the possible construction of this street. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, CITY OF ANDOVER 7"~/~ Todd J. Haas Assistant City Engineer TJH:rja Encl. cc: Jerry Windschitl, Ashford Development Tom Syfko, TKDA/Acting City Engineer Daryl Sulander, Acting City Administrator C) ~., ~"" .--. -1.... ....~. '7~ ... it"'K; .,. _. ,:r:..: '~.'- .....". () February 1. 1994 FEB 3 1994 r- - I.~J I . Mr. Todd Haas Assistant City Engineer City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. Andover. MN 55304 SUBJECT: Crown Pointe and Crown Pointe East Street Crossing Dear Todd: Tim Kelly passed along to me your January 3. 1994 letter regarding the proposed street crossing between Crown Pointe and Crown Pointe East and asked that I check into this location to see if a bridge or culvert is needed. I reviewed the permit applications for each of these and the District's ditch records. The proposed crossing would most likely occur between the incoming point from Ditch 20 and the Burlington Northern Railroad bridge. Considering that the most immediate downstream point is a bridge. I am assuming that something of similar hydraulic capacity would have to be put in with a similar opening size. Most likely, a bridge would have to be installed, however, some other large culverts such as a beebo or a string of large box culverts or arch culverts could possibly do the job as well. The point I want to make is that a proposed street crossing would have to have similar hydraulic characteristics as found on the Burlington Northern Railroad bridge. If you have any questions. please call me. Sincerely. MONTGOMERY WATSON ~~~ C Edward A. Matthiesen. P.E. Disuict Engineer, Coon Creek Watershed Disuict cc: Tun Kelly :crs 2028.0211/3.1.2 5;5 :"';":3~ -,,: .".: T.:;:. 3~2 ':73 1::': '''.3 :3:3 ..t:~:- ~':.~:3 ~3;(: ~~2':73 2::: S-:.;i:] ~'1~ ~',';.i-:'5 =~.' '~4""'.;_.] IJ~.;=~' o 0 N CREEK WATERSHED D S T R C T 12301 Centra' AvenU9 Nr)r"n~cst. JU/f'~ i.;O. Blcine - .\'1Inf''79~;:;la SS4j4 February 8, 1994 Todd Haas City of Andover 1685 Crosstown 8ld. Andover, HN 55304 RE: Crowne Point and Crowns Point East Crossing Dear Todd, This is in response to your January 3, 1994 letter, and supplements Ed Mathiesen's February 1 letter. I assume from your letter, and the minutes of the December 7, 1993 Council meeting, that there are two questions concerning a potential crossing: Question 1: Would a crossing, that may impact wetlands, be covered under the final rules of the Wetland Conservation Act? Answer: Probably. Both plats have been reviewed and approved by the Coon Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. 80th plats involved some fill of wetland. The fill proposed was found to be unavoidable for public health and safety reasons and the minimum needed. Wetland replacement plans for both sites have also been approved. The District's position on revisions to plats is that if there is a significant material change in the plans, then the new plan must be sucmitted and reviewed under the rules that are in effect on the date of the Change/submittal. Significance is determined by any increases in wetland impact (eg. increased fill, or increased loss of wetland functions or values). Question 2: Could such a crossing gain approval under these rUles? Answer: Yes. If no feasible and prudent alternative exists which avoids wetland impacts, the proposed fill is minimized, and is associated with a public health and safety need then the District has not found it reasonable to deny such requests to fill. At the December 7 Council meeting both the Fire and Sheriff's Departments expressed concern regarding emergency vehicle access to the sites. Such concerns provide a beginning but must be considered in light of the feasible and prudent alternatives that are offered. ~. "'~~: :l"l ';l':f:1od =:l::~1 'J Crown Pt-Crowne pt East Crossing Page 2 At the December 7 Council meeting both the Fire and Sheriff's Departments expressed concern regarding emergency vehicle access to the sites. Such concerns provide a beginning but must be considered in light of the feasible and prudent alternatives that are offered. Having not seen any plans for a proposed crossing, I can only suggest that the developer work closely with the City, and the District to determine alternatives for crossing the creek and any related wetlands. Such alternatives will be essential to an efficient and effective resolution of this matter. 1~."1 Tim Ke11 y, District Ad c: 2-1-93-62 2-1-93-90 TiJT~L ;:.. C2 Cjj:) -\-q ~ I ~y \~" ra Office of ANOKA COUNTY SHERlflE(~F'f\lr." KENNETH G. WILKINSON ' ,'"r.J) JAN 28 1994 325 Jackson Street - Anoka, Minnesota 559&J f j( ",", ,,: )1/!:'- k 612-421-4760 Fax 612-422-7503 CITY OF ANDOVER MONTHLY CONTRACT PRODUCTIVITY REPORT MONTH: December , 1993 This report reflects the productivity of the Andover contract cars, 3125, 3135, 3145 and 3155. It does not include activity by Sheriff's Department cars wi thin the City during non-contract hours, nor, activity by other Sheriff's Department cars within the City during contract hours. Papers served: o Radio Calls 543 Complaints 335 Medicals 12 P. I. Accidents 7 P.O. Accidents 22 Domestics 26 House Checks 25 Business Checks 700 Arrests: Traffic 33 OWl 4 Arrests: Felony 5 G.M. o Misdemeanor 17 Arrests: Warrant 3 Warnings: 23 Aids: pUblic 76 Other Agencies 47 TOTAL MILES PATROLlED: 10,322 CAPTAIN LEN CHRIST ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT PATROL DIVISION -7- Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer CITY of ANDOVER " MEMORANDUM " TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: Mayor & City Council Departments David Almqren Februarv 1, 1994 JANUARY 1994 MONTHLY BUILDING REPORT I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for the Month of January 1994: BUILDING PERMITS 19 Residential (14 Sewer/5 septic) 1 Remodeling/Finishing 1 Shed 1 Chimney/Stove/Fireplace 1 Structural Change 1 Porch/Deck 1 Repair Fire Damage APPROXIMATE VALUATION S 1,657,000.00 5,000.00 3,120.00 2,696.00 500.00 1,200.00 120,000.00 1,789,516.00 FEES COLLECTED 40.00 50.00 595.00 180.00 350.00 2,443.00 80.00 375.00 35.00 35.00 700.00 76.00 1,475.00 95.00 30.00 210.00 112.00 90.0n 12,711. 60 PERMITS 1 Demolition 1 Moving 20 Heating Permits 6 Heating Repair 14 Hook Up (sewer) 26 Plumbing Permit 2 Plumbing Repair 150 Pumping Permit 1 Septic Permit 1 Septic Repair 14 Water Meter 19 Certificates of Occupancy 59 Contractor's License 19 License Verification Fee 6 Health Authority Form 14 Sewer Administration Fee 14 SAC Retainage Fee 3 Reinspection Fee 25 Building Permits Total Building Department Income--January 1994 Total Valuation--January 1994 19,682.60 1,789,516.00 Total Number of Houses YTD (1994) - 19 Total Number of Houses YTD (1993) - 16 DA/jp N 3:~N :O~ -..l 00 n8~ ~g8~ n =,3", =':C 03_ o'a ~ _.OJ --~ '3: ii;; "'.. ;;;- 3:rl g,g nO nC "3 -.., -,., '" =~ '" ~n ... '"' '" N 0 '" oc - n - - - * n '"' '"' '"' :::; N N 0 .... N ~ "'~OO :O~ N Vl. _0 ~8 ..0 15'0 !l", ,,~ ~.~ _:I R :.n-< ;;} ~g 3: er3 n "3 '" ... !l '"' -::;" '"' '"' 0- or '" n N - - GO - n - '"' ~ . '"' '"' ... N '"' N '" '" '"' ",~N ... ~~ ... ~\O ... ON '" o~o" '" '" ("l"("l" 0"0" ;;;8u.> .,,8...80\ n8n 8 !l8!l8 ~S!:iQW g'tIl "'0"'0 nono nono 3: "c Eo Eo 3 :1,3:1. 3 :1,3:1, -!!!. 5'=5"= 5"=:;-= " tXco::::. B 0 Qo)I~' OJ . CioI . "'l 5' 5' g':!Jg':!J g.:!Jg.:!J ~~NVl 3: ;;;0 ;;;0 "il"il :::In::sn ::1::.... " " 0> 11 ?5 ?5 Q Q Q Q ::l or '" .... c c .... c c '"' ..,..,... "'lC .... =. =. .... ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ '"' ....ao~O\ GO - Q: Q: - n n - n n - 0> 0 ~ '"' '"' '"' ~~~~ ..,,~ ;; N '"' ... vo N ..,..,... '" N ~ ~ u.> \Ot-.)VlOO- ~ -..l 0 ~t:lo:",.., '" '" .... .... '"' vo oc ... .... - - - - '"' '"' '"' '"' ::; N ~ 0 ... .,- N ~ 2 ~~ ~ Vl. ( 00 ) \I ) ~~....... 3: ill;\ ... ......... .... '"' '" N vo ~~t:oo"" - - - "'l ~ i '"' '"' ~ '" t:l ~ ~tlo:",.., ::1:::: P N Q :Z~ C ~ tl Vl. ~~::iQW "'lll> ~ 0\ 1;Q8\O C N P ;:l (;' ...~ =,3", ""- ~ ~;:::. =>" =>" g ~,3 .." ll> ~ -.. .... n= Co ~;NVl Co "]1 <> '" '" .... 0 :i::c '" ::l &-6' 0 ~~:::;o- r~ ::l '" ::,:::: -'3 ::_~.: Q '" "n '" .... ~ .... ~a 0 '"' q ~ - .,.: ~ - - - ~ ~ '"' '"' N N ~ vo ... N I".~ N N i ~ 0\ I.. -..l 0 u.> I t Ii > I.. ..... I) Il, [)t .... i '" ~ .... L '"' '" ~ ... I- .... - - - - ~ ~ '"' '"' - .... ~ ... ~ L... !iil ... "N ~ ~ ~ 3: o z o ~ ~ m '" o > -< ~~ ~ (1) ~c) <I--t ~~ ~ ~ al--t 8~ ~ ~~ @\O ~ tj \0 a ~ ~ ~l-d ..-t- . ::I:: m o z m '" o ~ ::l 2 '" '" o ~ '" ~ '" o ~ . '" c z o ~ . ....w)e'F.~' \)ill !)N;F~~ ~F~ );;J;~q-:",~-.,; j -fI)L~L -:~~E-~N6-~,~s' C;LL:,-'" -' '0R IHE MONTH OF DECEMBER l1q3 OL-O~'94 o,t, 8'-\0114 "~ COUNCiL COpy MTrl ~TR YID CAL~ RESP SCENE FIRE' ft DAY TIME TI~E TIME EM~ 0AYi NIGHT! WEEKEN~ ADDRESS REASON ORI COUNTY RE5P m INC # --- --- --- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- --------- ------------------------ ---------------------------- ----- ---- ------ ~~ 411 ; Cl:12 0:: l"? 01:~2 co",.: N!GHT 152e8 7TH AVE YO O~!SUICID;~ , 128'15 -- " ~,: \ 1 ~ 1 0)' " ~2:3~ 0?' I)Q E~S ~IGHT 2 ~ ~ 3 :I.'~KER Lo,E 5LVD ~S~H~A A~T~C:< 125'9 "f.L... ... ..... 2 27 4' '1 1 ~7:06 1i:1O 17: 17 ::iC= D^V PRAIR:E FD . i~N';OVER UNK~OW~J ;YPE F:~:: - OI:Tc:. 'rti= , 'jQ \ ~ .. ' .;.;'.. " , , '~ , J..~. '- ... '~ BS i14 ) 00::0 00:~6 S',): 5-3 ~:~'~ 'lIGHT S:rJ.~L~D\J " \ 180TH AV~ ;jEHICLE :!RE 8 ::g76 8'1 415 3 08:37 08:2i r)e: A1 FIR~ OAf CROSSTOWN BLVD ~ SU~I.~ER 0 ,I, ACC!DENT 5 12980 0 ;0 m " ".:. 16:1~ :~:20 .:..,..:. DAY 13376 :A~iRlaGE ST 1 ' (0 - 0IFFICULTY BREATHING 12'196 - "')'.'" _"oJ .1 7 91 417 3 21: 03 21:05 21:09 FIFE NIGHT \ W) HANSON 2LiD & ANDOVER P ,., ACCIDENT 17 13003 B ;) H8 J O~:i.4 O~:28 00'-' 'lo~ JAY I W J 31::9 :1l0T~ 4IJE :IFE AL.':'R,~ i RESIOEN'IAL j 10 130H ,,), ' ...K.. 9 . . 419 4 1',12 16:15 16'16 FIRE DAY ( W ) 2600 l~' ~,.~ ,AVE T.'ANSFOPMER ON FIRE [OUTSIDE) 13 12035 :0 S4 420 !3:40 13:~3 ':ANC :!f,E JAY I W'I 2740 :~3~9 AVE O)C'~I . HOUSE ,:IRE 0 13069 - v.~..__ " 95 4" :J 18:42 18: 45 CANC E"S NIGHT (W) 4289 151S: AVE ADU~T ~ ~j j: - CHOKING 0 13079 .. .. ..Ii__ 12 16 4"'" S 23: 17 ...,...,........ 23:23 €MS NIGHT (t,\ :537 1287H AVE APi #1 ,~DUL T FEMAL: - DIABETIC K:A,: 7 13089 to':,.._ ' . , 13 97 423 8 1,,:45 16:48 16:53 EMS NIGHT 15945 vINTAGE 5T FEMALE - CHEST PAIN 11 13207 p 08 424 10 13:20 13:23 13:28 EM5 DAY 15221 ORCHID ST 24 YO - SUICIDE ATTEMPT 8 13263 15 99 425 10 17:18 17:20 17:28 FIRE DAY 13785 VALE ST CAR FIRE IN ATTACHED GARAGE 28 13270 16 100 426 11 09:36 09:37 09:40 FIRE DAY (W) 1862 BUNKER LAKE BLVD SMOKE >ROM BACK OF BUILDING 19 1 13305 17 101 427 11 16:49 16:51 16:54 EMS DAY (W) 968 CROSSTOWN BLVD 81 YO F - FEELING ILL 8 3 13316 18 102 428 11 21:16 21:16 21:23 FIRE NIGHT (W l 12 177TH AVE GAS BURNING IN THE ROAD 4 3 13321 19 103 429 12 09:09 09:13 09: 18 EMS DAY (w) 13943 CROCUS ST ELDERLY WOMAN FELL - LEG INJ 10 1 13343 20 104 430 13 06:17 06:26 06:30 EMS DAY 1478 140TH LN 32 YO F - BLACKED OUT 6 1 13352 21 105 431 13 18:28 18:29 18:31 EMS NIGHT 14465 OSAGE ST OB PATIENT - WATER BROKE 13 1 13381 22 106 432 13 19:06 19:08 19: 11 EMS NIGHT 14553 IBIS Si 4 YO IN CONVULSIONS 12 13384 23 107 433 13 19:18 19:20 19:27 EMS NIGHT 14761 ~MAH ST 39 YO FELL ON ICE 10 13385 24 108 434 14 18:04 18:06 18:08 FIRE NIGHT PRAI~IE PO & ANDOVER p, I. ACCIDENT 10 13421 25 109 OS 15 18: 41 18: 43 18:46 FIRE NIGHi CROS5TOW'J 3LVD & 135TH P .1. ACCIDENT 13 1 13456 26 110 436 16 02:29 02:36 02:39 FIRE NIGHT CO RD 58 ~ OF 7TH AVE P .1. ACCIDENT - ROLLOVE,~ 8 2 U469 27 111 437 16 10:50 10:51 10:S6 FIRE DAY ROUND ~,;KE BLVD & 173RD SMOKE FROM BASEMENT 14 2 13485 :8 112 438 16 ' 4' 'It: lQ:30 19:36 FIRE NIGHT 240e 181S: AVE P .1. ACCIDENT - ~CLLOVER 6 2 13519 ...,''''.J 29 113 439 17 06:04 06: 11 06: 14 >",' DAY 1657 1615T AVE GUN SHOT 6 3 13534 .1,:) 30 114 HO 17 07:33 07:37 07:H FIRE DAY lblSi . CF :0 RD 9 P .r. ACCIDENT - ROLLOVE~ 11 2 13536 3! ". 441 13 07:35 07:42 07: 44 EMS DAY i W I 13b~3 HIDDEN CREEK DR FEMA~~ - SEVERE STOMACH PAIN S l 13571 .., JL Ii, ~42 l? 01:32 o ~ : ~6 ,:ANC E,% NIGHT (w I ~A~~SON :L'/O 1 'wO".' FEMALE UiNG O;'~ 'i~OUND 8Y CAR 13611) Mill vr.:-; 33 117 443 P 11: :1 1"1) 11:18 E~S DAY ( W : 17714 BLUEBiRD ST OV~P003t - F au: OF CONTROL 13t.l S .1.... 3. 118 .44 :? 13:02 ~;:O3 13 :Oa ~!RE :'AY ( W) 1864 eUN~:R L;.K~ 2L'.JD SMOKE L'l ;'j.l~ ~cC' .\ 14 13620 I'.... """-~ 35 11 q 445 1J 15:22 15:23 15:28 FIPE DAY (~ ) 13735 ROU~D LAKE BLVD P .1. ACCIDENT 9 13623 ....' 16 120 446 ^, 06:26 06:28 CANC EMS DAY ISHl HANSON BLVD SUICIDE ATTE~PT 3 :3678 .. 37 1 '1 447 " 15:33 15: )7 15:44 EMS DAY 15921 FOX ST ADULT FE~ALE i~ SEIZURES 13 2 13707 ". .. 38 1" 448 -, 18:09 18: 12 18: 15 EMS NIGHT ;03i 3UNKER LAKE BL',D NECK IN:IJ~Y r .-:uM WRESTLING 11 1 13718 "' 00 123 449 ') 14:53 14:53 15:02 FIRE DAY 16603 V;~LEY DR VEHICLE FIRE 12 2 13746 0, .. M, 4r, :24 i50 22 16:38 l6: .11 lb:j4 EMS DAY 14-23 xEON 5T BABY - DIFFICULiY BRE,A THING J 1 13755 , 41 125 451 22 16:~4 1b:4, 1~:49 FIRE DAY 1"':'''' ~A?CISSUS ST FUR~t~C:: S~,OKING 8AD~Y 17 1 13756 ..JOJ./ 42 l' ' 452 23 01:48 01:S5 I)""" :~5 NIGHT 175,,2 EID El'm 5 S ST DIAEETIC REACT! ON b 2 13m .cb ".'''' 43 127 4.53 23 13:24 13:26 13: 2g EMS OM 3422 135TH LN POSSIBLE HEART 7 1 13794 44 1'~ 454 23 22:n 22:43 22:44 EMS NIGHT 17476 FLINTWOOD 5T HE,AO INJURY 7 13816 Co 45 129 455 26 00:56 01: 00 01:05 FIRE NIGHT (w) 13833 QUAY ST CAR FIRE 12 1 13894 4" 130 456 27 18: 51 18:S5 18:S8 FIRE NIGHT IS065 CRANE ST OVEN FIRE 20 3 13971 47 131 457 28 00:51 00:57 00:58 EMS NIGHT 2537 133TH AVE APT I 1 DIABETIC REACTION 3 1 13985 J8 122 458 28 09:02 09:04 09: 12 FIRE DAY 3' " 1l..1 c.- m C,~R 0.0> 10 2 ~3996 ."._1 r~:"(.. 4? ", 450 28 10:29 jO: 3i 10: 35 FIRE DAV 1775 BUNK::? LAKE 8L va S~OKE PROM PENCED ;REA 6 14000 .N M. :0 l?~ ~6e 23 11: 41 11: 44 :::.n ~!RE D ~ 'I 11::,''''t :L:JE3IRD )i G~S S:~::~L IN T~E G~RAGE J . ,(l.fI~ M' ,-", . _"V'J, :. ~ ... 4,: 2) DO:36 00:.11 ')'.): ~ ,; E~S tJIGHi 173:0 V::;:I! .~ S::\'::RE n:K PA!N 6 1 :')70 52 : ~.6 ~~2 30 15:32 15: 23 15:24 S% JAr 2'13. e!jN~-ER LAKE BLVD O',:LO G:vEN ~; C~iG \4E)!C.~~ION 7 :~Og7 53 137 463 31 13::3 13:20 i 3: 37 EMS DAY 13842 NORTH~OO) OF: 95 YO 1" 1 FROM A FALL 10 14135 ,1- M 54 138 46J 31 17:00 17:05 17: 11 FiRE DAY 17110 ~AvAJO ST PIRE !N THE s~~~p 11 2 iJl:6 50J 9,3 '~100V~: V~LjN;~~R FIRE GE:~R'MEii :OTA~ :i2: ~N0 E~S CALLS ~0R T~E MONTH OF DECEMBER 1;93 :!JT,~L S 01.'O~194 DRILLS ~ MEETINGS :0 22 72 EMS DAY 11 22 59 EMS NIGHT 4 II 35 EMS WEEKEND (DAY) 3 15 58 EMS WEEKEND (NIGHT) 28 70 224 EMS TOTAL 12/01/93 DRILL 36 12/08/93 DRILL 33 12/15/93 DRILL 30 12/22/93 BUSINESS MEETING 33 MTH aTR YlD # # # 132 11 30 101 FIRE DAY 6 9 45 FIRE NIGHT 6 15 43 FIRE WEEKEND (DAY) 3 14 51 FIRE WEEKEND (NIGHT) 26 68 240 FIRE TOTAL 21 52 173 TOTAL DAY 17 31 104 TOTAL NIGHT 10 26 78 TOTAL WEEKEND (DAY) 6 29 109 TOTAL WEEKEND (NIGHT) 31 78 251 TOTAL DAY 23 60 213 TOTAL NIGHT STATION CALLS CURRENT ~; Of MONTH YTD lOT AL STATION I STATION II STATION III 29 253 54.m 12 122 26.29% 13 89 19.16% 54 464 ...---------- ----------- 54 138 464 GRAND TOTAL , ~ '~~ LLa-16-q4 Metropolitan Council Advocating regional economic, societal and environmental issues and solutions DECErV.!ED February 3, 1994 FEB 8 1994 CITY 01- /-1"" . \"iL''-.,'\/ER James E. Schwantz, Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 5530-1-2612 RE: City of Andover Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review City Hall Park Complex No. 2-38-Acre MUSA Expansion Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15796-1 Dear Mr. Schwantz: At its meeting on January 27, 1994, the Metropolitan Council considered the city of Andover's comprehensive plan amendment. This consideration was based on a report of the Committee of the Whole Consent List. A copy of this report is attached. The Metropolitan Council informs the city of Andover that it may place the plan amendment into effect and no plan modification is necessary. Attached is a copy of a letter from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission commenting on the plan amendment. Dottie Rietow Chair DR:lv Attachments cc: David L. Carlberg, Planner, City of Andover Donald Bluhm, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 612291.6359 An Equal Opportunity Employer Fax 291-6550 TDD 291-0904 @ RecyCled Paper ,4 . Metropolitan Council Meeting of January 27, 1994 Business Item: A2f METROPOUTAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East FIfth Street, St Paul. Minnesota 55101 612 291-6359 IDD 612 291-0904 DATE: January 21, 1994 TO: Metropolitan Council FROM: Dottie Rietow SUBJEcr: City of Andover Plan Amendment City Hall Park Complex No. 2-38-Acre MUSA Expansion Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15796-1 Metropolitan Council District No.9 REPORT OF THE COMMI'ITEE OF THE WHOLE BACKGROUND This plan amendment proposes to add approximately 38 acres to its urban service area. The area to be included is the City Hall Park Complex No.2 The 38-acre MUSA expansion request is to provide the main park complex buildings with city sanitary sewer. The park complex will be equipped with softballlbaseball fields, soccer fields; two volleyball courts and a central building, which would be hooked up to the sewer system. The proposed facility will add approximately 822 gallons/day to Andover's projected sewer flow. The Metropolitan Disposal System has adequate capacity to provide for the wastewater needs proposed in the plan amendment The plan will not impact the metropolitan transportation system. The amendment is in conformity with metropolitan system plans. ISSUES/CONCERNS None RECOMMENDATION That the Metropolitan Council inform the city of Andover that it may place the plan amendment into effect and no plan modification is necessary. . /'~ . ~. ...==~ \V Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1633 612 222-8423 March 29, 1993 Ms. Lynda Voge, Referrals Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 East 5th street st. Paul, MN 55101 RE: Metropolitan council Referral File No. 15796-1 Dear Ms. Voge: The Metropolitan Waste Control commission has reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendment submitted by the city of Andover for the city Hall Park Complex No.2. The amendment proposes to expand the Metropolitan Urban Service Area by 38 acres to provide sanitary sewer service to the park complex. The amendment projects this service will add 822 gallons of wastewater per day to the wastewater flow for the city. Our review indicates that the Metropolitan Disposal system has adequate capacity to provide for the wastewater needs shown in the plan amendment. The Commission, therefore, has no objection to the Plan Amendment, as submitted. Very truly yours, ~.~~ Manager, Municipal Services DSB:EJB:bw 15796-1.ejb ~ c, '~I-.:) \ I j Equal OpportUnity/Affirmative Action Employer CL d-I!:5-q4 ~ Metropolitan Council Advocating regional economic, societal and environmental issues and solutions February 3, 1994 >>EC~ 1; - " iC,.2 ~,fp '^ . -<'--::'..1-,0 FEB 8 1994 CIT't' . Vr ~1j\J~-,: .,1_-.-..... -~ .. <.f"; James E. Schwantz, Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.',\!. Andover, MN 55304-2612 RE: City of Andover Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review 235-Acre MUSA Expansion Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15796-3 Dear Mr. Schwantz: At its meeting, on January 27, 1994, the Metropolitan Council considered the city of Andover's comprehensive plan amendment. This consideration was based on a report of the Committee of the Whole. A copy of this report is attached. The Metropolitan Council adopted the attached staff report with the following recommendations: 1. That the city of Andover be informed it can place the plan amendment into effect and no plan modification is necessary. 2. That the city of Andover be informed that the Metropolitan Council can review future MUSA expansion requests only when the Anoka County Transportation Plan is complete. Sincerely, Dottie Rietow Chair DR:lv Attachment cc:David L. Carlberg, Planner, City of Andover Donald Bluhm, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street 51. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 612291.6359 An Equal Opportunity Employer Fax 291-6550 TDD 291-0904 * Recycled Paper , . Metropolitan Council Meeting of January 27, 1994 Business Item: B-4 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 291-6359 TOD 612 291-0904 DATE: January 21,1994 TO: Metropolitan Council SUBJECf: City of Andover Comprehensive Plan Amendment 235-Acre MUSA Expansion Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15796-3 Metropolitan Council District No.9 REPORT OF THE COMMITfEE OF THE WHOLE BACKGROUND The city of Andover is proposing to add approximately 235 buildable acres (275 total acres) to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The area to be included is generally located in the southeastern part of the city (see Attachment 1). The 235-acre MUSA expansion will add approximately 517 housing units to the urban service area of Andover. The 235 acres included in this plan amendment were originally included in the MUSA expansion proposed as part of the city's overall plan revision submitted to the Council in December, 1991. The key question the Council must address in this plan amendment is whether to allow the city to place this plan amendment, which will add 235 acres to the MUSA, into effect. The major issues associated with this plan amendment are the potential transportation impacts created by additional development from an expanded MUSA Specifically, the city of Andover projected that increased development will result in congestion on TH 10 and TH 65 after the year 2000. The city of Andover identified potential impacts from analysis done in conjunction with the revision of its overall plan amendment in 1991 (Referral File No. 14206-5). In that plan review, Council required a plan modification in which the city had to withdraw all MUSA expansion requests (except 100 acres) until a comprehensive traffic analysis of the potential impact of the planned land uses will have on TH 10 was completed. At its April 15, 1993 meeting, the Committee of the Whole heard the mayor and staff from Andover propose a three-year interim plan for MUSA expansions. The Committee directed the staff to work with the city of Andover to develop an updated transportation plan and to arrive at an interim proposal which could be brought back to the CounciL This plan review is part of that interim agreement. 1 f' Recently, the cities of Andover and Ramsey and Anoka County have contracted with a consulting firm to evaluate the potential congestion problems and to recommend solutions. Council staff has worked with the city and Anoka County on this transportation study effort. ANALYSIS The city of Andover projects to have 7,585 households in 2000, substantially above the Council's forecast of 7,150. Household forecasts are the basis for determining land demand in a particular community. Applying land demand factors to the Council's forecasted households results in a total demand plus overage for land within the MUSA of 1,711 acres for the year 2000. Based on information provided by the city, there are currently 3,520 acres of land in the MUSA designated for residential use. This land is near full development. As of December 1993, there were 502 acres of developable land within the MUSA Subtracting the available acres (502) from the demand (1,711 acres) indicates that the city can justify adding 1,209 acres to the MUSA With this plan amendment, the city is requesting to add 235 acres (275 gross acres) to the MUSA From the standpoint of supply and demand, the city can justify adding the 235 acres requested to the MUSA The earlier plan amendment (Referral File No. 14206-5) identified potential traffic congestion problems associated with additional development in Andover. As part of the review of that amendment, the Council directed the city to address the potential congestion problems. The Council also directed staff to work with the city and the county in addressing those problems and in developing an interim agreement for future MUSA expansions. The cities of Andover and Ramsey and Anoka County have contracted with a consulting firm to complete this work. Staff has reviewed the scope of work and believes it will define the future problems on TII 10 and TII 65 in Andover and Ramsey. A variety of solutions will be identified. Staff believes Andover is making progress on the study, and on the basis of the progress made and the commitment of the city of Andover and the County, it recommends that the city be allowed to place the amendment into effect. There is sufficient capacity in the Metropolitan Waste Disposal System to acccimmodate the sanitary sewer flow anticipated from the proposed MUSA area. The city has modified its on-site septic system ordinance to meet Council policy requirements. The city has adopted the Council's Interim Strategy for the Reduction of Nonpoint Source Pollution, and the amendment states that stormwater runoff resulting from development of the area will be diverted to sediment basins prior to it ultimate discharge into any wetland or Coon Creek. The amendment is consistent with Council housing policies. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached staff report with the following recommendations: 1. That the city of Andover be informed it can place the plan amendment into effect and no plan modification is necessary. 2 .\ 2 That the city of Andover be informed that the Metropolitan Council can review future MUSA expansion requests only when the Anoka County Transportation Plan is complete. Respectfully Submitted, Dottie Rietow, Chair 3 ", Committee of the Whole Meeting of January 20, 1994 Business Item: B-4 METROPOUITANCOUNOL Mears Park Centre, 230 East F1fth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612291-6359 TDD 612291-0904 DATE: January 12, 1994 TO: Metropolitan Council Committee of the Whole FROM: Comprehensive Planning (Richard Thompson, 291-6457) SUBJECf: City of Andover Comprehensive Plan Amendment 235-Acre MUSA Expansion Metropolitan Council Referral FJle No. 15796-3 Metropolitan Council District No.9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODucnON The city of Andover is proposing to add approximately 235 buildable acres (275 total acres) to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The area to be included is generally located in the southeastern part of the city (see Attachment 1). The 235-acre MUSA expansion will add . approximately 517 housing units to the urban service area of Andover. The 235 acres included in this plan amendment were originally included in the MUSA expansion proposed as part of the city's overall plan revision submitted to the Council in December, 1991. ISSUE The key question the Council must address in this plan amendment is whether to allow the city to place this plan amendment, which will add 235 acres to the MUSA, into effect. The major issues associated with this plan amendment are the potential transportation impacts created by additional development from an expanded MUSA Specifically, the city of Andover projected that increased development will result in congestion on TH 10 and TH 65 after the year 2000. The city of Andover identified potential impacts from analysis done in conjunction with the revision of its overall plan amendment in 1991 (Referral FJle No. 14206-5). In that plan review, Council required a plan modification in which the city had to withdraw all MUSA expansion requests (except 100 acres) until a comprehensive traffic analysis of the potential impact of the planned land uses will have on TH 10 was completed. At its April 15, 1993 meeting, the Committee of the Whole heard the mayor ane) staff from Andover propose a three-year interim plan for MUSA expansions. The Committee directed the staff to work with the city of Andover to develop an updated transportation plan and to arrive at an interim proposal which could be brought back to the Council. This plan review is part of that interim agreement. .' Recently, the cities of Andover and Ramsey and Anoka County have contracted with a consulting firm to evaluate the potential congestion problems and to recommend solutions. Council staff has worked with the city and Anoka County on this transportation study effort. ANALYSIS The city of Andover projects to have 7,585 households in 2000, substantially above the Council's forecast of 7,150. Household forecasts are the basis for determining land demand in a particular community. Applying land demand factors to the Council's forecasted households results in a total demand plus overage for land within the MUSA of 1,711 acres for the year 2000. Based on information provided by the city, there are currently 3,520 acres of land in the MUSA designated for residential use. This land is near full development. As of December 1993, there were 502 acres of developable land within the MUSA Subtracting the available acres (502) from the demand (1,711 acres) indicates that the city can justify adding 1,209 acres to the MUSA With this plan amendment, the city is requesting to add 235 acres (275 gross acres) to the MUSA From the standpoint of supply and demand, the city can justify adding the 235 acres requested to the MUSA The earlier plan amendment (Referral FIle No. 14206-5) identified potential traffic congestion problems associated with additional development in Andover. As part of the review of that amendment, the Council directed the city to address the potential congestion problems. The Council also directed staff to work with the city and the county in addressing those problems and in developing an interim agreement for future MUSA expansions. The cities of Andover and Ramsey and Anoka County have contracted with a consulting firm to complete this work. Staff has reviewed the scope of work and believes it will define the future problems on TH 10 and TH 65 in Andover and Ramsey. A variety of solutions will be identified. Staff believes Andover is making progress on the study, and on the basis of the progress made and the commitment of the city of Andover and the County, it recommends that the city be allowed to place the amendment into effect. There is sufficient capacity in the Metropolitan Waste Disposal System to accommodate the sanitary sewer flow anticipated from the proposed MUSA area. The city has modified its on-site septic system ordinance to meet Council policy requirements. The city has adopted the Council's Lozterim Strategy for the Reduction of Nonpoint Source Pollution, and the amendment states that stormwater runoff resulting from development of the area will be diverted to sediment basins prior to it ultimate discharge into any wetland or Coon Creek. The amendment is consistent with Council housing policies. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached staff report with the following recommendations: 1. That the'city of Andover be informed it can place the plan amendment into effect and no plan modification is necessary. 2 " subd. 2, 1978). The Act also gives the Council the authority to establish guidelines governing the amendment review process (Minn. Stat. 473.854). The city of Andover submitted its proposed comprehensive plan amendment on August 26, 1993. On October 19, 1993, the Chair determined that the amendment presented a potential impact on the metropolitan transportation system. Based on an extension of the review period, the 9O-day review period will conclude on January 31,1994. ANALYSIS Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework Forecasts (Michael Munson) Andover's plan forecasts population (27,000) that is above the forecast of the Metropolitan Council (22,300) for the year 2000. The plan contains a projected average household size of 28 persons per household for the year 2000. This results in a forecast of 7,585 households in 2000, above the Council's forecast of 7,150. The city averaged about 100 residential permits from 1980 to 1984, and about 315 per year from 1985 to 1989. Since 1989 the city has averaged 375 building permits, the majority (80 percent) within the MUSA The city's forecasts indicate some increase in growth in households in the 1990's (2,282) over the 1980's (1,961). The growth in the next decade is then forecast to decline to 1,800. Given the sharp slowdown in regional growth anticipated for the 1990's and beyond, few if any cities are likely to surpass the growth they experienced in the 1980's. The only ones that have any chance of doing so are communities on the edge of development (emerging suburbs). They will continue to experience rapid growth as closer-in suburbs fill up. Whether they can actually increase the amount of growth they receive will depend on how fast the region grows. Land Supply and Demand When local governments request an expansion of their MUSA lines, the Metropolitan Council reviews those requests based on several criteria. The local unit of government must demonstrate a regional need and there must be adequate capacity available in the metropolitan sewer and highway systems. The Council initially reassesses land supply and demand based on a comparison of figures provided by the city and current Council forecasts. If the city's land supply is below or approaching the five-year overage and regional facilities are adequate, the Council will agree to service the expansion area. Based on information provided by the city, there are 3,520 acres of land in the MUSA designated for residential use. This land is near full development. Based on the analysis of Council staff, the city of Andover had 258.6 acres of developable land within the MUSA in 1991. Of this land, 138.6 acres was designated as residential and 120 acres was designated as commerciaL Since 1991, the city has added 244 acres of land to the MUSA As of December 1993, there were 502 acres of developable land within the MUSA Land demand is based on household forecasts for the city of Andover. The Council forecasts 7,150 households in Andover in the year 2000. This represents an increase of 2,270 households 5 , ,. between 1990-2000. Applying land demand factors, the demand for the city for the different land uses will be 906 residential acres, 10 commercial acres, 50 industrial acres 5 public acres, 135 acres for streets and 35 acres for parks. This yields a total demand of 1,141 acres which with overage yields a total demand of 1,711 acres in 2000. Taking the available acres from the demand plus overage (1,711 acres) indicates the city can justify adding 1,209 acres to the MUSA With this plan amendment, the city is requesting to add 235 net acres (275 gross acres) to the MUSA From the standpoint of supply and demand, the city can justify adding the 235 acres to the MUSA Sanitary Sewers and Surface Water (Jim Larsen) Sanitary Sewers Sufficient capacity exists in the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's disposal system to accommodate the sanitary sewer flow anticipated from the proposed MUSA area. The city has modified its on-site septic system ordinance to meet Council policy requirements and is in the process of implementing those changes. Surface Water Quality The city has adopted the Council's Interim Strategy for the Reduction of Nonpoint Source Pollution. In addition, the proposed amendment specifically states that stormwater runoff resulting from development of the area will be diverted to sediment basins prior to its ultimate discharge into any wetland or Coon Creek. Transportation (Carl Ohm) The city of Andover has submitted a MUSA amendment for 235 acres (275 gross acres). That submittal does not resolve the issues raised in the Council actions of April 15, 1993 (Referral File No. 14206-5). At the Council meeting of April 22, 1993, the Council instructed the staff to work with the communities to address the transportation problems created by additional development from an expanded MUSA The Council also instructed the staff to work with the city of Andover to develop an interim agreement on future MUSA expansions. This plan amendment is part of that interim agreement. The key problem was the projected congestion on TII 10 and TII 65. The updating of the Anoka County Transportation Plan was recommended by the Council as a means of analyzing the problem and developing a strategy that would address the impacts of an expanded MUSA. The city along with Ramsey and Anoka County have entered into a contract with a consulting firm (BRW) to complete this work. Staff has reviewed the scope of work and believes it will define the future problems on TII 10 and TII 65 with and without added MUSA in Andover and Ramsey. In turn, if a congestion problem is projected, a variety of solutions will be identified. While the projected problems on TII 10 and TII 65 still appear valid, staff believes Andover is making progress in better defining the problems and solutions. On the basis of the progress made and the commitment of the city of Andover and the county, staff recommends that the city be 6 2. That the city of Andover be informed that the Metropolitan Council will not allow any further MUSA expansions until the update to the Anoka County Transportation Plan is complete, mitigation alternatives are identified and improvements to TH 10 and/or TH 65 are programmed, if needed. " REVIEW OF CITY OF ANDOVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT BACKGROUND The city of Andover is proposing to add approximately 235 buildable acres (275 total acres) to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The area to be included is generally located east of Hanson Boulevard NW between Bunker Lake Boulevard NW and Andover Boulevard NW. The 235-acre MUSA expansion will add approximately 517 housing units to the urban service area of Andover. The 235 acres included in this plan amendment were originally included in the MUSA expansion proposed as part of the city's overall plan revision submitted to the Council in December, 1991. In that plan review, the Council required a plan modification directing the city to withdraw its proposed MUSA expansion request, except for 100 acres. The city was to withdraw the MUSA expansion request until a comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact the planned land uses will have on TII 10 and TII 65 is completed and all parties have agreed to an implementation schedule. At the April 15, 1993 meeting of the Committee of the Whole, the mayor and staff from the city of Andover presented a proposal for a three-year interim plan. The plan called for 200 acres to be added to the MUSA for each of three years. They asked that the Council staff be directed to work with Andover staff to develop an interim development proposal based on the 6OO-acre allocation. The Metropolitan Council directed the Council staff to work with the cities and county on this transportation study effort. The Committee also directed the staff to work with the city of Andover to arrive at an interim proposal, which would then be brought back to the Council On May 13, 1993, the Metropolitan Council responded to the city of Andover's response to a plan modification. In that response, the city responded to all the non-transportation modification requirements. In addition, it agreed to work with the surrounding communities and Anoka County to prepare a comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact the planned land uses will have on TII 10. On that basis, the Council allowed the city to place the plan amendment (Referral File No. 15796-2) into effect in which the city added 100 acres to the MUSA Since that time, the cities of Andover and Ramsey and Anoka County have contnbuted $27,000 and contracted with the consulting firm of BRW to prepare an update to the Anoka County Transportation Plan. The consulting firm has begun the planning process, and is in the early stages of data gathering and analysis. The study is expected to be completed by August, 1994. AUTHORI1Y TO REVIEW The Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act of 1976 requires local units of government to submit comprehensive plan amendments to the Metropolitan Council for review (MinD. Stat. 473.864, 4 allowed to place the plan amendment into effect, but that the Council not allow any further expansion of the MUSA until the update to the Anoka County Transportation Plan is complete, mitigation alternatives are identified and improvements to TH 10 and/or TH 65 are programmed, if needed. Housing (Audrey Dougherty) The proposed addition of 235 acres to the MUSA will add 571 housing units to the city at a density of 2.2 units per acre. The amendment proposes to add a wide range of housing values designed to serve low, moderate and upper income levels, and identifies that a number of units in the $77,900 to $90,00 range are planned. The 1990 Census indicated that the city had a median housing value of $95,500. Figures also indicated a single-family housing vacancy rate of 1.9 percent. That rate is nearly twice the one percent rate considered healthy for movement in the market. The city should monitor carefully the addition of future single-family units to avoid increasing vacancy concerns. The amendment is consistent with Council housing policies. Policy 22 states: .Communities at least partially within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area have the responsibility to provide adequate land for projected housing growth and an appropriated share of housing opportunities for people with low, moderate and modest incomes." FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Based on land supply and demand in the city, it can justify adding 1,209 acres to the MUSA Therefore, the city can justify adding the 235 acres included in this plan amendment to the MUSA 2. Sufficient capacity exists in the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's disposal system to accommodate the sanitary sewer flow anticipated from the proposed MUSA area. 3. The city has adopted the Council's Interim Strategy for the Reduction of Nonpoint Source Pollution and the plan amendment states that stormwater runoff from the development will be diverted to sediment basins prior to its ultimate discharge into any wetland or Coon Creek. 4. The cities of Andover and Ramsey and Anoka County have entered into a contract to update the Anoka County Transportation Plan. Staff believes that this update will define the future problems on TH 10 and TH 65 in Andover and Ramsey and, if a congestion problem is projected, a variety of solutions will be identified. 5. The plan amendment is consistent with Council housing policies. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached staff report with the following recommendations: 7 " 1. That the city of Andover be informed it can place the plan amendment into effect and no plan modification is necessary. 2. That the city of Andover be informed that the Metropolitan Council will not allow any further MUSA expansions until the update to the Anoka County Transportation Plan is complete, mitigation alternatives are identified and improvements to 1H 10 and/or 1H 65 are programmed, if needed. 8 ,\ I I :111 i II , I II II . '" .: ~ ... ... ... ~ ~ & "8 u: u: ell '" ~ - 01 z w (!) W -11 oJ <t a:: ::> a:: I ~ ~ 1i: lLJ oJ '" 'Z Vi ,~ w ~ ~b_J il!! ::: ~ ~'il, - .. ~ ~ _ z ... g ~ , " o. ~ lLJ !;:( I-' (/) lLJ I ~ ~ 1i: lLJ, oJ '" Z Vi ~ ~ >>>~'':> c ~~~::~ i - I I~ II; :!:!! b ~ :: .. -- ~~ . ~ ~~~~5i~ ~ .. '" ~ -' mmi 3!i"~~;; ....~:Il:~::! ~ ~ :-::-:,:,:......: ~ 16:24 D.C.C. FEB 14 '94 - ~ \1':0," ;? 8... ~~ """ ~ - :;" ., -' UJ - ~ : S- - ~ 0_ ,,... . e N-. a... :: ';: := 'A =~ - ~ C ;:r ~ ==J :c :.. U; --- ("0 :.~ - -' ..., '" :; H ,- <ii'S: ~ !:n=~ --- => - ~~;'" ~;:.. '< ~ :.; :::.. ,.. - :: O.~ s..=~ en e = ~ :: 5 ;- =.:. rJl ~ ~ rA _. -"'0 .... ~ - I':tl -. = ., .....", ~ r! : c ".9~-. -l""'("') ~=2 go: ..; :=. = ~ ~2!:. " ,.... S' ~ ;-a:: o.a:~ t:'J _. g~~ ~ :n'~ - .. ~ ~ :: - ""C;::.._ e _ _._ ::; =- 0 ~ ..s ~ :. ~ --~ C ::!._""< ii1 ~eT.l .w ~;!l;1 --- ~ ~::;- =-==- ;;go- --..: C"l;;;, C t: _ 3 -=- =~ S Ui'~ ~ ~.5-~ = ~- ""'UJ ""1. = _ c =';:' ""2..= n.::,. o . 1.0 ::: oS ~ ~~= :::".;.t b o ~'N ~rii~ "'..:.l - - - - - -. =-'" e =: 2.. g "< = C ~ ...", ~:::'" :::=.. - - :1- M ~ ~ S" 0> ~ U):;:: S"~ ..... " - ..... ;:;.-. ~ 0 t-.:)= ...- -c:... <:. ... t,;:l -ro Ul = N e"-..j c.. :;.:~ -0 ~ W n.s- ~~ ~. s.. 0' 2 ~ r .. o .., (') ~ " !! r ;;: ..... -0 'E. - :: ~ '" :: ~ ~ c.. ~ ~ ~ t>j .. c:;":l ~ ,... ~ I:n N 1.0 N VI . w ..... a o Ul 50 'C N t'" ~ n ~ t>j C"l ::>0 "0 :;. ~ ~ .. Cfl ~ t-:l C"l .- > - . lii ::I. C"l o :2 C ~ - o 7- Cfl c:: :2 o ~ - ... ::;! - n :: ,...... ..... a '-' ~ 1-" 1'1 l-' (/.l :j - .- Ifl .. - C"l ""1 ~ UJ t::l .- IJ) Ci :::: > ~ ~ "'" .. b C"l ~. ".. --3 5 :2 o "'<:l ":j ;::- C"l - B :2 ~/l ..... ~ ~ -< ~ I" ~ g) rt ::r i z . :a: ~ o ~ w :2 >- :;::: ~ o "'l 2 V1 VI w ~ o ,...,., Ul c: R (\) (/.l CIl ~ r.l I:n ~ :: n . 0_ Cll:;r "OlD o '"'(I) -- 3 c ID - ... :: CI) 1ft - 0 ~ 0-0... .....;s: (") -..:: o ::l .. ::l '"' ID ID 1ft n 0 -- 0'0 ::l ... -=: > C"l =3 -< Ul rt I'll 1;0 o ,...,., (/) ~ (') (') I'll 1;0 I:n I ~ ~ 1'1 P.2 r- - o () m m ~ Z o tn c m m --i ~ O. g 0 -11-0 50m :::::0:::::0:;::0 ~ )> >- Z o -< o C -t :c . --j m -n )> () - r- - -I -< rebruary 15, 1994 4117 1 65tti Av, NW Andover, l'lN 55304 To the HonorarJle r1ayor ancl City Councilmen, City of Andover re Special Use Permit for Steps for Success Homes I would like to recommend that Hlis body APPROVES HIe special use permit for the foster home to be run by I'll', and I'll'S, Dayton JaM, We own a 13.5 acre parcel of laM Hlat abuts HIe proposed f\Orne sHe on HIe 'Nest side and welcome Hlem to our nei9hborr,ood, and feel our city sflould rJe proud to have a home of this caliber in our city limits, Wlien we received tlie notice of tlie liear'in~l before tlie Zoning and Planning CommiSSIOn regarding tliis matter, I personally called l'lrs, Kim Jatin and spoke to her about trle I-lame 51-Ie now operates, tlie structure of tlieir pr-ogram for the gir-Is, and the tiistory of tlieir' being a foster home for many years, I was very impressed witli tlie program slie spoke of. Havmg raised five Cliildren of my own and being around many young (Jeople over tlie years, I feel tlieir home in tI-ds neighborliood will in no way be any more of a detriment tlian a large family witli a dozen kids vv'ould be, Ctiildren make less noise tlian barking (jogs, too! I per-sonally told I)er that she and lieI' family, as foster cliildr'en really do become a valid part of your personal family, were more than welcome to enjoy our open field wl'lere ti)ey can play soccer or softball as our own children did over tI'le years, and tliat tliey are more than welcome to stroll tl-Iougli our lovely woods tliat abounds witt', wildlife and birds, We also liave a volleyball court tliey are more tI-lan welcome to use, I feel tl-,at if some of tI)e persons complaining at the Planning Commission I-leeting rlad bottiered to speak to tile Jaiins as I dill trley would have an entirely different opinion, I certainly did not understand tiOW persons 1 iving a mi Ie away from tlie property in question would in any way be affected by a foster liome on a different street and situated on tile back of a secluded five-acre parcel of land tnat abuts OUI' land more than anyone else's, Daily on trle news medla tlier'e is talk of ''We must do more for our young people to get tliem on the r'igtit track," Here is a family tliat is doing tI"Jat in a very important way, i tiope you find it Justified to grant tliem the Special Use Permit. S~~, [-lrs, Lowe 11 (Haze 1) Jensen 1/ r /cA/('/ /Lo-i~ L:{.;( /~k) /~frC1 u~k ;;-,~ r J~ ~;d~,~)'~tf /u~ /#L ~ ~/' /i c~ j2-L,.,v0, . () ()u. f f) f '- ;;, ,,/ ~I ~~ ~~f q,~/~UL-.{ /4 ~~~ j)~ 'f) I/;/ ;: - r- ( ./(,Kz 14--~ ~, (DL) J-P ~ ~+, ~ ~ Le( ~1hj / '/' 1~ // - . - .-, .' '- )- 07 ~ ,-,~~ ;(-1 ~ j/D ~ -' ,', / (' " r -//) , r o{ ~Lk.-f.--;f. ...vvl ~ _..J~J::--':-L<'&~<--<'~V ~A-,JU2..~ , , ,', I r: ( " ' Itc .k-'"-!~L:f (~)--t:(" 7-( M f( - f ,~~~f "He ~--r--L--f. _~ )U-LjJ ~ II...--i i<-A_!L , , / ell, 'J{ u-<--'-?L(ju.LG,,~f ;tfc:f ;l[o-c ~,Lp JLjMjl_'-~~L( '~l ,-d~ L'~(,1' c-ik a I / _ (; (/- ,_(- _/u,,-~~I.-~'-V ik.<vL--/-S....) ~ cy)yz.., I..-,.u-~ ~. / ,r! - I / / / ' ,). ,r 7t~~{.ck.., .,:a~ ~~ /!~ 0-6't-A'_'~{LhL.i, /', 1, t, ~ -- I' .1 jl(~;{ C JW-V) To Whom it may concern~ My wife and I recently moved into the residence at 4041 160th lane N. W. in Andover, MN. We had the opportunity to meet most of the neighbors at or around the time we moved in July, and feel that Dayton and Kim are exceptional people whom have alot to offer the neighborhood and community. It is my understanding that some of the new neighbors are somewhat concerned over the fact that Dayton and Kim operate a home for troubled children. In the six months that I have lived here, there has not been any delinquency problems due to these kids, and we even use some of the girls for babysitting purposes, with which we have been very pleased. The property value of the home we purchased went up substantially for the previous owners, and was not affected by this fact at all. As a matter of fact, Dayton and Kim's residence was one of the nicest homes to look at this Christmas season, and the yard and home are always picked up and clean. In closing, I would like to let the new neighbors know that I understand their concerns. but that they really need to look at the facts before they make a decision about this matter. SincerelY9- ? Joe Tarnowski ., Attorneys at Law and Counselors Munstenteiger & Schutter, P.A. Anoka Prolessional Building Suite 300 403 Jackson Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2372 FAX (612) 421-3817 (612) 421-2300 February 14, 1994 The Honorable J. E. McKelvey, Mayor Members of the Council City of Andover Andover City Hall Andover, Minnesota 55304 RE: Special Use Permit "steps of Success" Group Foster Home 16676 Valley Drive NW Andover, Minnesota Dear Mayor McKelvey and Members of the Council: Dallas and Carol Felegy, who reside at 16742 Valley Drive N.W., Andover, Minnesota, requested that I review the Planning Commission Minutes and testimony regarding the special use permit application referenced above. These clients live next door to the property involved in the proposed special use. I have also been contacted by Dan and Becky Voss, who live approximately 100 feet away from the applicant's property. I am told that 28 families have expressed their opposition to the proposed permit. Both Mr. and Mrs. Felegy and Mr. and Mrs. Voss are convinced that the approval of the special use permit will have a definite adverse impact upon the market value of their respective properties. other neighbors in the area have expressed the same opinion. The Planning commission report indicates that the Anoka county Assessor's Office believes that there will be no adverse impact upon value. The conclusion is unjustified and self-serving. Although I cannot be with you at your meeting on February 15, 1994, I have recommended to my clients that they should obtain their own independent appraisal and have testimony available at your meeting which bears on this issue. In addition, I am recommending to my clients to give further testimony on the question on the safety of this use in view of the fact that the property is adjacent to a busy county highway. . I realize that granting or denial of a permit is fundamentally a political judgment to be made by the city council. However, there are cases in which certain decisions are "legal" in nature and not political. In reviewing this situation, I consulted with Minn. Stat. S 462.357, subd. 7 & 8. subdivision 8 states that a The Honorable J. E. McKelvey February 14, 1994 Page 2 residential facility serving from 7-16 persons shall be considered a "permitted multi-familv residential use of the property for purposes of zoning". In essence, then, the applicants are proposing to put a multi-family use into a single family residential zoning district. A variance should be required rather than a special use permit. Of course, the applicant could not meet the tougher tests applicable to variances, because there can be no demonstrated hardship shown. (One must look at the property involved and not the people involved to determine hardship.) I realize that your staff and the Planning Commission apparently believe that the use applied for fits under the definition of "rest home" which is one of the uses that can be allowed under a special use permit. However, taking into consideration the requirements of Minn. stat. S 462.357, subd. 7 and 8, it is hard to conceptualize that the term "rest home" even comes close to falling within the meaning of the statutory classification of "licensed residential facility". In summary, then, we believe that the proposal to issue a special use permit under the "rest home" classification is erroneous and, more properly, this issue should be reviewed in the nature of a "variance" as prescribed by your own ordinances. It seems clear from the state's statutes that what is involved here is a multi-family residential use being proposed for a single family residential zone. Finally, I am told that the Planning commission took testimony at their meeting and then recessed the meeting and withdrew to a private room before a final vote. A few minutes later the Planning Commission reconvened the meeting and took a final vote on the subject of the special use permit. Obviously, the Planning Commission voted to recommend to you that the special use permit be approved. I am not at that point of our investigation to finally conclude whether such a breach of the Minnesota Open Meeting Law was "innocent" or was in fact intentional. In any case, the action of the Planning commission to withdraw from the public into a private session, and then reconvene and go through the "pro forma" process of voting was inappropriate and as such their action was illegal. No proper recommendation from the planning commission should be considered validly before your council. I am sure your own legal counsel will review with you the requirements of the open meeting law and the penalties imposed therein. I do realize that these types of neighborhood issues are difficult for all involved. All we ask is that your analysis of the issue be fair. I recommended to my clients to make sure that all of their testimony regarding adverse impact in the neighborhood, safety, depreciating land values, etc. should again be presented to you in The Honorable J. E. McKelvey February 14, 1994 Page 3 view of the fact that applicable Supreme Court cases require that we "protect the record" by introducing testimony on all pertinent issues at the City Council level. This is necessary to protect our right to a court review. I have decided not to have a court reporter present; however, I would ask that a full record of the proceedings before your Council be kept and then made available to me in the future. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, ER, P.A. SHM/cka Copy: Mr. and Mrs. Felegy Mr. and Mrs. Voss ~2.357 HOUSING, REDEVEWPMENT, PLANNING, ZONING Subd. 6a. It is the policy of this state that handicapped persons and children should not be excluded by municipal zoning ordinances or other land use regulations from the benefits of normal residential surroundings. For purposes of subdivisions 6a through 9, "person" has the meaning given in section 245A.02, subdivision 11. Subd. 7. Permitted single family use. A state licensed residential facility serving six or fewer persons or a licensed day care facility serving 12 or fewer persons shall be considered a permitted single family residential use of property for the PUrposes of zoning. Subd. 8. Permitted multifamily use. Unless otherwise provided in any town, municipal or county zoning regulation as authorized by this subdivision, a state licensed residential facility serving from 7 through 16 persons or a licensed day care facility serving from 13 through 16 persons shall be considered a permitted multifamily residential use of property for purposes of zoning. A township, municipal or county zoning authority may require a conditional use or special use permit in order to assure proper maintenance and operation of a facility, provided that no conditions shall be imposed on the facility which are more restrictive than those imposed on other conditional uses or special uses of residential property in the same zones, unless the additional conditions are necessary to protect the health and safety of the residents of the residential facility. Nothing herein shall be construed to exclude or prohibit residential or day care facilities from single family zones if otherwise permitted by a local zoning regulation. History: 1965 c 670 s 7: 1969 c 259 s 1; 1971 c 121 art 5 s 7; 1971 c 179 s 4; 1971 c 519 s 1; 1971 c 559 s 1.2; 1975 c 60 s 2; 1978 c 786 s 14,15: Ex1979 c 2 s 42,43; 1981 c 156 s 248; 1982 c 490 s 2; 1982 c 507 s 22; 1984 c 617 s 6-8; 1985 c 62 s 3; 1985 c 194 s 21: 1986 c 444; 1987 c 113 s 22 462.358 PROCEDURE FOR PLAN EFFEClUATION; SUBDIVISION REGULA- TIONS. Subdivision 1. [Repealed, 1980 c 566 s 35] Subd. Ia. Authority. To protect and promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, to preserve agricultural lands, to promote the availability of housing affordable to persons and families of all income levels, and to facilitate adequate provision for transportation, water, sewage, storm drainage, schools, parks, playgrounds, and other public services and facilities, a municipality may by ordinance adopt subdivision regulations establiShing standards, requirements, and procedures for the review and approval or disapproval of subdivisions. The regulations may contain varied provi- sions respecting, and be made applicable only to, certain classes or kinds of subdivi- sions. The regulations shall be uniform for each class or kind of subdivision. A municipality may by resolution extend the application of its subdivision regulations to unincorporated territory located within two miles of its limits in any direction but not in a town which has adopted subdivision regulations; provided that where two or more noncontiguous municipalities have boundaries less than four miles apart, each is authorized to control the subdivision of land equal distance from its boundaries within this area. ! ' Subd. 2. [RepeaIed, 1980 c 566 s 35] Subd. 2a. Terms of regulations. The standards and requirements in the regula- tions may address Without limitation: the size, location, grading, and improvement of lots, structures, public~, streets, roads, trails, walkways, curbs and gutters, water supply, storm drainage, ligliting, sewers, electricity, gas, and other utilities; the planning and design of sites; access to solar energy; and the protectio~ and conservation of flood plains. shore lands, soils, water, vegetation, energy, air quality, and geologic and ecologic features. The regulations shall require that subdivisions be consistent with the municipality's official map if one exists and its zoning ordinance, and may require consistency with other official controls and the comprehensive plan. The regulations Ordinance No.8, Section "3.cz t J Repair Service: Repair and/or servicing of such items as musical, scientific and medical instruments, photographic eq~ipment, jewelry, watches, clocks, small household appliances, office machines, shoes and clothes, and similar uses. (8WW, 10-6-87) Research: Medical, chemical, electrical, metallurgical or other scientific research conducted in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. Research Laboratory: An establishment or other facility for carrying on lnvestlgation in the natural, physical o~ social sciences, or engineering and development as an extension of investigation with the objective of creating end products. (8WW, 10-6-87) _.--.. .t, , . ....- Resort: Any structure or group of structures containing more than two (2) dwelling units or separate living quarters designed or intended to serve as seasonal or temporary dwelling on a rental or lease basis for profit, the primary purpose being recreational in nature. Uses may include a grocery for guests only, fish cleaning house, marine service, boat landing and rental, recreational areas and equipment, and similar uses normally associated with a resort operation. Rest Home (Nursing Home): A private home for the care of children or the aged or infirm or place of rest for those suffering bodily disorders. Such a home does not contain equipment for surgical care or for the treatment of disease or injury, nor does it include maternity care or care for mental illness or infirmities. () Retail Trade and Services: Stores and shops selling the personal services or goods over a counter. These include: antiques, art and school supplies, auto accessories, bakeries, barber shop, beauty parlor, bicycles, books and stationery, candy, ,cameras and photographical supplies, carpets and rugs, catering establishments~ china and glassware, Christmas tree sales, clothes pressing, clothing and costume rental, custom dressmaking, department stores and junior department stores, drugs, dry goods, electrical and household appliances, sales and repair, florist, food, furniture, furrier shops, garden supplies (year-round operation only), gifts, hardware, hats, hobby shops for retail of items to be assembled or used away from the premises, household appliances, hotels and apartment hote~s, interior decorating, jewelry, including repair, laboratories, medical and dental research and testing, laundry and dry cleaning pick-up, processing to be done elsewhere, laundromat, leather goods and luggage, locksmith shops, musical instruments, office supply equipment, optometrists, paint and wallpaper, phonograph records, photography studios, service station, restaurant, when no entertainment or dancing is provided, shoes, sporting goods, tailoring, theater, except open air drive-in, tobacco, toys, variety stores, wearing apparel and similar type uses. (8WW, 10-6-87) Ri~ht of Way: The publicly owned prlvate property lines within the pedestrian way, or thoroughfare. Page 14 area between adjacent limits of a street, (8F, 2-19-80) G) . Ordinance NO.8, Section " 1rS.03 Special (Conditional) Uses General Statement (A) Special Use Permits may be granted or denied in any district by action of the City Council. The Andover City Clerk shall maintain a record of all Special Use Permits issued including information on the use, location, conditions imposed by the City Council, time limits, review dates, and such other information as may be appropriate. A copy of the Special Use Permit shall also be fil~d with the Building Inspector. Any change involving structural alteration, enlargement, intensification of use, or similar change not specifically permitted by the Special Use Permit shall require an amended Special Use Permit and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being issued. All uses existing at the time of adoption of this Ordinance and automatically granted a Special Use Permit, shall be considered as having a Special Use Permit which contains conditions which perIllits the land use and structures as they existed on said date and any enlargements, structural alteration, or intensification of use shall require an amended Special Use Permit as provided for above. Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular zoning district, may, under some circumstances be suitable. When such circumstances exist, a Special Use Permit may be granted. Conditions may be applied to issuance of the permit and a periodic review of the permit may be required. The permit shall be granted for that particular use and not for a particular person or firm. The cancellation of a Special Use Permit shall be considered admini~tratively equivalent to a rezoning and the same requirements and procedures shall apply. :(-,\ "'-'- (B) Criteria For Granting Special Use Permits: In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and: the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands, ' existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, the effect on values ,of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. -I. : '-.c" . If it shall determine by Resolution that the proposed use: will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the community Page 42 .' @ " J -" J J J n I U J Tl u J Report for n I L.J Indian Meadows " I LJ J street Improvements City Project 93-24 T\ I l.J n tJ n u Andover, Minnesota Feb. 1994 n u File No. 17158 "'1 u n U n 11 n Bonestroo LllL.J Rosene r I Cl Anderlik & \J\J\l Associates Engineers & Architects St. Paul. Milwaukee ,.., J n I W ...., l.) r, u ~ u --, LJ ~l u n .J ~ LJ ,.., u .., u ., 1.. , .., ~I r, ~ J .., . .J " .....J r , J .r', < J " i J '"1 u ~ IJ ~ I Ii) W\] Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E Robert W. Rosene, PE.. Joseph C. Anderlik. P.E Marvin L. Sorvala. PE Richard E. Turner, PE Glenn R. Cook. PE. Thomas E. Noyes. P.E. Robert G. Schunicht. PE. Susan M. Eberlin. c.PA. *$enior Consultanr Howard A. Sanford. FE. Keith A. Gordon, PE. Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E. Richard W Foster, P:E. David O. Loskota. PE. Robert C. Russek, AJA Jerry A. Bourdon, PE Mark A. Hanson, P.E Michael T. Rautmann, PE. Ted K. Field, PE Thomas R. Anderson, ^-'A Donald C. Burgardt. P.E. Thomas E. Angus, PE Ismael Martinez. P.E. Michael P. Rau, PE Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects January 24, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 Re: Indian Meadows Street Improvements City Project No. 93-24 Our File 17158 Dear Mayor and Council: Agnes M. Ring, AJ.C.P Philip J Pyne. P.E. Thomas W. Peterson. PE. Michael C. lynch, PE. James R. Maland. P:E. Jerry D. Pertzsch, P:E. Scott J. Arganek, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P_E. Mark R. Rolfs, PE. Mark A. Seip, PE. Gary W. Marien, PE. Daniel J. Edgerton, PE. A. Rick Schmidt. PE. Philip J. Caswell. P.E. Mark D. Wallis. PE. Miles B. Jensen, PE L. Phillip Gravel. P_E. Karen L. Wiemeri, P.E Gary D. Kristofitz, PE. F. Todd Foster, PE. Keith R. Yapp, PE. Douglas J. Benoit, PE. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. Cecilia Olivier, PE. Paul G. Heuer. PE. John P Gorder. PE. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson James F. Engelhardt Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the construction of streets within the Indian Meadows Addition, south of County Road 20 and east of County Road 7. The report contains a detailed cost estimate of the proposed work and a plan of the area. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council and City Staff at your convenience to review the content of the report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4L If ~ Glenn R. Cook, P.E. GRC:ci I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. dL~ Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Date: January 24. 1994 2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, MN 55113 · 612-636-4600 ~ Reg. No. 9451 .., Cl ..J Table of Contents ~ ,_J ~ l) Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Introduction ""1 U n Discussion ~J Project Costs and Assessments Conclusions and Recommendations r"r LJ ~ ~J Appendix 1 - Cost Estimate - Mill and Overlay Appendix 2 - Cost Estimate - Total Reconstruction Figure No. 1 - Street Construction and Typical Section rl u ..., ,j .., ~) , .-, L1 " ~) , 1 LJ n lj , , \.J ~ 1 . ) ,...) U Andover Indian Meadows Street Improvements r-r L.l Page No. 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 8. 2 .-, LJ n LJ Introduction r1 u ., The City of Andover has requested this report to determine the feasibility of reconstructing the streets within the Indian Meadows Addition, south of C.S.A.H. #20 and east of C.S.A.H. #7. The City received a petition from property owners requesting street improvements in the area. L ) .--, u Lj The roadways in the Indian Meadows Area were surfaced in the early 1980's and the existing pavement has deteriorated considerably. The rural roadways presently exist with a 24' foot wide bituminous surface and 3' foot wide aggregate shoulders. The existing rural section consists of four inches of Class 5 aggregate base and 1-112" inches of bituminous surfacing. ~ ~, LJ r, l.J The proposed rural section would be a 24 foot wide pavement with two foot wide shoulders. The rural section would utilize the existing ditches and culverts in the area with improvements where necessary. ~ u n cj There are no recent traffic counts available for the area. An estimate of approximately 200 vehicles for the average daily traffic count may be made assuming that twenty five of the lots in the area will use the roads and each will have 10 trips daily. The streets presently seIVe a confined residential area. It is anticipated that 155th Avenue would be extended to the east and Hopi Street and Eldorado Street would be extended to the south in the future. ... LJ ,., u LJ Soil borings have not been taken in the area. Preliminary investigation indicates a fine sand subgrade, but we anticipate additional soils investigation will be necessary prior to construction. , , LJ n The storm water runoff presently drains to the low areas along the roadways and percolates U into the soil. Existing pipe culverts facilitate the drainage in the ditches along the roadways. : 1 LJ . , L) r\ u ,.-, Andover Indian Meadows Street Improvements 3 LJ .. l J ~ J n L-J , , l J ;--, l j ,., LJ '-, LJ M '--. j ,', L J n . ) r1 ~1 I' , ~ ..., LJ r, 1..1 n L) , , l 1 , , 1.1 r1 l} .., L} Discussion The existing streets in the Indian Meadows Addition have deteriated to the level where normal maintenance is not adequate. We have reviewed two options for construction of the street section. The first option is to mill and overlay and the second option is total reconstruction of the surface. The mill and overlay option will first consist of roto-milling the existing bituminous pavement. The roto-milling, with either a road reclaimer or a mill, will crush the bituminous pavement and mix it with two inches of the existing base materials. This mixing process is used to strengthen the existing aggregate base. The mixed bituminous/aggregate base will then be graded and shaped to the design grade and crown. The roadways will then be surfaced with two and one half inches of bituminous wear course. The proposed rural section will have three foot wide shoulders th,at will be covered with 2 inches of topsoil and be sodded. The total reconstruction will consist of removing the existing bituminous surface and placing four inches of aggregate base. The roadways could then be surfaced with two and one half inches of bituminous wear course. The proposed rural section will have three foot wide shoulders that will be covered with 2 inches of topsoil and be sodded. The existing centerline and driveway culverts along the roadway will be utilized for drainage. The drainage in all areas will be directed to low areas that presently have storm water draining to them. The existing storm sewer drainage has been working adequately as there are no known problems. The overall storm sewer system in the area has not been constructed and is not included as a part of this project. All existing driveways will be matched with gravel base and/or bituminous surfacing. The construction of ten foot long bituminous driveway aprons off the edge of the pavement is proposed for all existing gravel driveways. Sodding with topsoil is proposed for the majority of the lawn areas that will be disrupted due to the road construction. For the purpose of creating an alternative with a reduced project cost, we have provided a cost estimate that excludes all sodding. This alternative provides for the restoration with seeding and mulch, utilizing borrowed topsoil. Andover Indian Meadows Street Improvements 4 .., u ...., LJ Project Costs and Assessments n LJ ..., The project costs for the street improvement are outlined in this section. The itemized cost estimates are provided in the appendix and include a 5 percent contingency; 18 percent for legal, engineering and administration and 5 percent for bonding and capitalized interest. The indicated unit prices are as projected for the 1994 construction season (ENR 5450 Mpls.). Li n LJ r, '.../ Estimated Project Cost (Mill & Overlay) Estimated Project Cost (Total Reconstruction) $147,170 192,415 r-, ..J Alternate: n ....J Project Cost with seeding (in lieu of sodding) Project Cost with seeding (in lieu of sodding) $141,320 186,565 ,-, LJ ..., We recommend the project be constructed by milling of existing bituminous and placement of 2Yz of bituminous wear material. ....I .-, The project costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners adjacent to the streets on a unit basis. There are 25 lots along the streets which are proposed to be assessed. The cost/lot for the mill and overlay improvement is $5,885.00. The cost/lot for the reconstruction improvement is $7,700.00. The use of seed in lieu of sod reduces the project cost by $235.00 for each of the options. ;.J r--1 :..1 ..J ~--l . j .-, --..1 ,-~ LJ n J__l r, Li r1 Andover Indian Meadows Street Improvements 5 LJ ,.., LJ ,~, u Conclusions and Recommendations r"1 . J n The project as reviewed herein is feasible as it relates to general engineering principals and construction procedures. Based on information contained in this report, it is recommended that: ~ } ,...., l J 1. This report be adopted by the City of Andover as a guide for construction of the street improvements. ,..-" c j 2. The City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to a public hearing. r . , J ; } A public hearing be held to determine further action to be taken. The property owners adjacent to the roadway should be notified for hearing purposes. n 3. ;"'\. l ) -, 4. The following schedule be implemented for the project: ~ i Receive Preliminary Report Hold Public Hearing Order Plans & Specifications Approve Plans & Specifications Bid Date Award Contract Start Construction Complete Construction ~1 .. , ...j -, .....t I~-' ~' r', l_ J -~ ., l J -, \ J " '_ J Andover Indian Meadows Street Improvements ." L J February 15, 1994 March 15, 1994 March 15, 1994 April 19, 1994 May 13, 1994 June 7, 1994 June 20, 1994 August 31, 1994 6 " l} ,-' LJ ., LJ " 1.. } ...~ l } '\ \ j l J n . j r\ l J ..., ~ } .. ~ I'"' ;...J -, , I r, c J ..-, l ! , } -, ,I --, t__} ,-. LJ Appendix 1 Cost Estimate Proposed Street Improvements Mill and Overlay Indian Meadows Unit Estimated Estimated Item Unit Price Quantity Cost Base preparation SY 1.00 16,100 16,100.00 Milling existing bituminous SY 1.25 16,100 20,125.00 Class 5 aggregate base TN 8.00 650 5,200.00 Bituminous wear material, Type 41 TN 15.00 2,500 37,500.00 AC-1 bituminous material for mixture TN 130.00 150 19,500.00 Remove bituminous surfacing SY 2.00 200 400.00 Driveway restoration SY 7.50 200 1,500.00 Sod SY 2.00 5,000 10,000.00 Topsoil borrow CY 8.00 350 2.800.00 Estimated Construction Cost $113,125.00 5% Contingency 5.655.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost $118,780.00 18% Legal, Engr., Admin. 21.380.00 Total $140,160.00 5% Bonding & Capital Interest 7.010.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $147,170.00 Alternate Total Project Cost with Seeding ( in lieu of sodding) $141,320.00 Andover Indian Meadows Street Improvements 7 " u ,"{ ..J n U n ~ J n LJ '\ . J , , LJ '"! L} ,---, LJ n u .., LJ r, L1 ,., <..1 ,., -' '-. --------} ,--, L) n L) n u rl LJ Appendix 2 Cost Estimate Proposed Street Improvements Total Reconstruction Indian Meadows Unit Estimated Estimated Item Unit Price Quantity Cost Remove existing bituminous SY 2.00 16,300 32,600.00 Common Excavation CY 2.00 6,000 12,000.00 Class 5 aggregate base TN 8.00 4,000 32,000.00 Bituminous wear material, Type 41 TN 15.00 2,500 37,500.00 AC-l bituminous material for mixture TN 130.00 150 19,500.00 Driveway restoration SY 7.50 200 1,500.00 Sod SY 2.00 5,000 10,000.00 Topsoil borrow CY 8.00 350 2,800.00 Estimated Construction Cost $147,900.00 5% Contingency 7,395.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost $155,295.00 18% Legal, Engr., Admin. 27.955.00 Total $183,255.00 5% Bonding & Capital Interest 9,165.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $192,415.00 Alternate Total Project Cost with Seeding ( in lieu of sodding) $186,565.00 Andover Indian Meadows Street Improvements 8 '1 ~) ~~ 5 i" -'" ~" <: "", '" "w '" w9 ; 85 ::!ili ~ :i...J m 6~ ~~~ II I N NN ;;: ..J ., z~ , J z o F u IX r-, ~ <: u ~ ~ ) ,'--' @) N Lj; P") " ~ J ,.--, L.J --' 133~lS V1O)fVO @ --, , <D Ll) --- v 0 N 6) 0 Z ,..... '1S :I: -i. vi U P") ~ N ~ " Z .@ ~ <: N ~ - 111 Ll) en eX) ~ - ,..... ,..... ~ 111 ,-' , J -.. L I -, , J ~, J .-, u .--, . . -' ,--, ,., Ll v Ll) <D 'lS IdOH N e 3lJ~IJ VJNI P") N ~ .' L ) r, I) " '-.) ~, , '____m_n -____ -_________nJf,n~~_Ii_~ t!'_\(~~;>.L _ ______,' "__ m___m____ m____ ___ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. LJ 3nN3AV 4lL o ..... e ~~ -; ~i::.o 0"'''0 c: _" .. aoc. ma:<< ~C~ w oe: :;) Cl r;: '" '" v ;; N I ::i "'l '" 0> 0 u t- U w 6 oe: III Q. I- ~ Z w >! u ::lE w 0 ~ VI w VI ~ Z ~ a. z 0 2! :i ~ W o! ::Ii ~ Z W ~ ~ 0 0 I- ~ III ~ ,...., u ,.., - l LJ ,.., I W '1 u ~ u ,., ! U 1 u 'l Report for u J 173rd Lane N.W. 174th A venue N.W. J Heather street '1 ~J Street Improvements J G\(-ao City Project j}s-:2CT J fl Andover, Minnesota U Feb. 1994 n u File No. 17159 0 .AM Bonestroo n Rosene u n Ll Anderlik & 'J\J\] Associates ,...., U Engineers & Architects St. Paul. Milwaukee 'I W n . J ..., L1 -, c j ,..., ..J ..., u n u r ~ LJ n LJ r, u M :..1 ..., LJ r-" L1 ...., u .-, u ..., u r-", ~.J n u n u ...., u M1 !:1 r 1 ~ Ocro G. Bone-stroo. P.E Robert W. Rosene. PE.. Joseph C. Anderlik. PE Marvin L. SorvaJa. PE Richard E. Turner. FE Glenn R. Cook. PE Thomas E. Noyes. PE Robert G. Schunicht PE. Susan M. Eberlin. CPA .Senior Consultant Howard A. Sanford. PE, Keith A. Gordon, PE Robert R. Pfefferle, PE. Richard W Foster, P.E David 0. Loskota, P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, PE Ted K. Field, P.E. Thomas R, Anderson. A.I.A. Donald C. Burgardt PE. Thomas E. Angus. P.E. Ismael Martinez, PE. Michael P Rau. P.E Agnes M. Ring. A.l.e.P Philip J Pyne. PE. Thomas W. Peterson. FE. Michael C. Lynch, PE. James R. Maland. P.E. Jerry D. PenzSCh, PE. Scon J. Arganek. P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson. PE. Mark R. Rolfs. PE. Mark A. Seip, P.E. Gary W. Morien, PE. Daniel 1. Edgerton, P.E. A. Rick Schmidt. P.E. Philip 1. Caswell, P.E. MarkD. Wallis, P.E Miles B. Jensen, PE. L. Phillip Gravel. P.E. KaTen L. Wiemeri. PE. Gary D. Kristofitz, P.E. F. Todd Foster, P.E. Keith R. Yapp, P.E. Douglas 1. Benoit PE. Shawn D. Gustafson, PE. Cecilio Olivier. P.E Paul G. Heuer, PE John P. Gorder, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson James F. Engelhardt Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects January 21, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 Re: 173rd Lane NW, 174th Ave. NW and Heather Street Street Improvements City Project No. 91-20 File 17159 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the construction of 173rd Lane NW, 174th Avenue NW and Heather Street east of Round Lake Boulevard. The report contains a detailed cost estimate of the proposed work and a plan of the area. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council and the City Staff at your convenience to review the content of the report. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4~ ;e ~ Glenn R. Cook, P.E. GRC:rsb I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. :;/( ~ K &-a{ Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Date: January 21. 1994 Reg. No. 9451 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113 . 612-636-4600 .., -J "-f u Table of Contents ..., L.l ,...., Letter of Transmittal ~ ..., Table of Contents u Introduction r<: :..1 Discussion r~ Project Costs and Assessments _J Conclusion of Recommendation ,...., ~ Appendix 1 - Cost Estimate - Street Page No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 ..., Appendix 2 - Cost Estimate - Storm Sewer Ll Figure No.1 Street Construction and Typical Section ..., u ...... ~ n LJ ... L1 ..., u .., , J r1 u ... u .., ~ ..., Andover 173rd LN, 174th LN, Heather Street - Street Improvements 2 LJ .., .J .., . J .., l J .., ~ ..., LJ .., l. 1 rl _J .., .J ~1 LJ .., LJ .., oJ ., u .., _1 .., LJ r-, , J r, u .., u n u n LJ Introduction The City of Andover has requested this report to determine the feasibility of constructing 173rd Lane NW, 174th Avenue NW and Heather Street in the area east of Round Lake Boulevard. The City received a petition from property owners requesting street improvements in the area. The streets in the area presently exist as 18-22 foot wide rural section roadways consisting of fine sand. The proposed urban section would be 24 feet face to face with bituminous berm curb similar to that constructed in other parts of the City. This section is in accordance with the City standard for temporary urban residential streets. There are no traffic counts available for the area. An estimate of approximately 160 vehicles for the average daily traffic count may be made assuming that sixteen of the lots in the area will use one of the roads and each lot will have 10 trips daily. The streets presently serve a confined residential area and are not anticipated to be necessary for through traffic in the future. Soil borings have not been taken in the area. Preliminary investigation indicates a fine sand subgrade, we anticipate no addition soils investigation will be necessary prior to construction. The storm water runoff presently drains to the low areas in and along the roadways and percolates into the soil. Andover l73rd LN, l74th LN, Heather Street - Street Improvements 3 ..., . J rr ~J .-, . J '1 . J -', Ll .-, t J r> .~ J n LJ ,-. u " ~ J -. r' LJ ..., '...J " u n I 1 r~ .J " u " u .-, c..J Discussion The construction of streets in the area will first consist of grading and shaping the subgrade to the design grade and crown. Four inches of Class 5 aggregate base will then be placed over the prepared subgrade. The roadways will then be surfaced with two and one-half inches of 2341 bituminous wear course. The proposed urban section will have a 4" bituminous berm curb. The drainage in the area cannot be properly handled without a comprehensive storm sewer design or without significant ditching and pond design. We have looked at the costs for storm sewer in the area. To drain the street and yards in the area, the storm sewer costs alone would be approximately $163,500. The majority of the property along the roadways is developed and the construction of storm water ponds would require excavating someone's yard area. We have proposed to direct the storm water drainage to the existing low yard areas. The water will percolate into the soil quickly as it does now, but there will be some inconveniences associated with the temporary drainage solution. If the streets are constructed now as proposed, without any storm sewer, the costs for installing storm sewer later will be approximately 15% higher. The additional costs are due to increased pipe lengths necessary to install the pipe through yards instead of under the streets. All existing driveways will be matched with gravel base and/or bituminous surfacing. The construction of ten foot long bituminous driveway aprons off the edge of the pavement is proposed for all existing gravel driveways. Sodding with topsoil is proposed for the majority of the lawn areas that will be disrupted due to the road construction. For the purpose of creating an alternative with a reduced project cost, we have provided a cost estimate that excludes all sodding. This alternative provides for the restoration with seeding and mulch, utilizing imported topsoil, as little or no topsoil exists to be salvaged. Andover 173rd LN, 174th LN, Heather Street - Street Improvements 4 n LJ .-, '..J n cJ ..., ;..J ..., '-.J ..., L1 -, l J ,-, u ,-. L1 .-, L1 " L1 ., w --. LJ " LJ ,..., u .-, w " LJ n l j n LJ Project Costs and Assessments The project costs for the street improvements are outlined in this section. The itemized cost estimates are provided in the appendix and include a 5 percent contingency; 18 percent for legal, engineering and administration and 5 percent for bonding and capitalized interest. The indicated unit prices are as projected for the 1994 construction season (ENR 5450 Mpls. ). Estimated Project Cost Alternate: Project Cost with seeding in lieu of sodding $123,270 $116,750 The project costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners adjacent to the street on a unit basis. There are 16 lots along the streets which are proposed to be assessed. The cost per unit for the improvement based on 16 assessable units is $7,705, the cost per unit for the seeding alternative is $7,295. The stonn sewer costs will vary, depending on the amount of work to be completed. The first option would be to excavate the existing ponding areas to increase the storage capacity for stonn water. The second option would be to construct stonn sewer from the ponds to a major ponding area south of the addition on 173rd. The estimated cost for the pond grading is $14,965. The estimated cost for extending the storm sewer is $165,225. The stonn sewer construction and the pond grading would require easement acquisition. The cost of Easements is not included in the cost estimates. We would not recommend that the stonn sewer work be done at this time. We would recommend that pond grading be completed to improve the on site water storage. Andover I73rd LN, I74th LN, Heather Street - Street Improvements 5 n LJ .., '---' r'l _J " '-J ..., LJ ..., LJ n u n ...) ~ LJ ~ LJ ...-, LJ LJ ...., u .-, ...J ..0 u ....., ...J n u n LJ ..., LJ Conclusions and Recommendations The project as reviewed herein is feasible as it relates to general engineering principals and construction procedures. Based on information contained in this report, it is recommended that: 1. This report be adopted by the City of Andover as a guide for construction of the street improvements. 2. The City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to a public hearing. 3. A public hearing be held to determine further action to be taken. The property owners adjacent to the road way should be notified for hearing purposes. 4. The following schedule be implemented for the project: Receive Preliminary Report February 15, 1994 Hold Public Hearing March 15, 1994 Order Plans & Specifications March 15, 1994 Approve Plans & Specifications April 19, 1994 Bid Date May 13, 1994 Award Contract June 7, 1994 Start Construction June 20, 1994 Complete Construction August 31, 1994 Andover 173rd LN, 174th LN, Heather Street - Street Improvements 6 .. L J .. ; J " . J .. ~J ~l L J ~ LJ " ;J n L) --, L J " LJ n L1 \.J ..., LJ r, L J " '..,.J '1 .J .., LJ .. LJ L.J Appendix 1 Cost Estimates Proposed Street Improvements 173rd Lane - 174th Avenue - Heather Street Unit Estimated Estimated Item Unit Price Quantitv Cost Common excavation CY 3.00 3,500 $10,500.00 Subgrade preparation SY 1.00 9,400 9,400.00 Aggregate base class 5 TN 6.50 2,300 14,950.00 Bituminous wear material, Type 41 TN 15.00 1,450 21,750.00 AC-l bituminous material for mixture TN 130.00 87 11,310.00 Remove bituminous surfacing SY 2.00 300 600.00.00 Driveway restoration SY 7.50 300 2,200.00 15" storm sewer LF 20.00 300 6,000.00 Catch basin EA 700.00 4 2,800.00 15" pipe apron EA 325.00 8 2,600.00 Cable concrete SF 8.00 80 640.00 Sod with topsoil SY 2.00 6000 12.000 Estimated Construction Cost $ 94,750.00 +5% Contingencies 4,740.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost 99,490.00 + 18% Legal, Engr. Admin. 17,910.00 117,400.00 +5% Bonding and Capitalized Interest 5,870.00 Total Project Cost $123,270.00 Alternate Total Project Cost w/seeding (in lieu of sodding) $116,750.00 Andover 173rd LN, 174th LN, Heather Street - Street Improvements 7 .--, -J .. J .--, u .--, . 1 .., Appendix 2 Cost Estimates Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements 173rd Lane - 174th Avenue - Heather Street ~ J Alternate No. 1 .. L1 ,-., ..J .-, L1 ,-., L1 ,-., u ro u ,..., LJ .. L1 " u n lJ ...., LJ n u .-, L1 .. -1 Item Unit Price Estimated Quantity Unit 18" Storm Sewer Jacked 18" Storm Sewer Std. Catchbasin manholes LF 50.00 LF 200.00 EA 1,500.00 Estimated Construction Cost +5% Contingencies Total Estimated Construction Cost + 18% Legal, Engr. Admin. 2,000 60 10 +5% Bonding and Capitalized Interest Total Project Cost Alternate '2. Pondinl! Common excavation Seeding CY AC 3 2,500 3,000.00 1.00 Estimated Construction Cost +5% Contingencies Total Estimated Construction Cost + 18% Legal, Engr. Admin. +5% Bonding and Capitalized Interest Total Project Cost Andover 173rd LN, 174th LN, Heather Street - Street Improvements Estimated Cost 100,000.00 12,000.00 15.000.00 $127,000.00 6,350.00 133,350.00 24.005.00 157,355.00 7,870.00 $165,225.00 $ 9,000.00 2.500.00 $ 11,500.00 575.00 12,075.00 2,175.00 14,250.00 715.00 $14,965.00 8 .., ...J o ..... 2 .w.! ~ 0; ~1:'~ lDutJO c:...."tJ. aac:. ...J <. ma:oq:oq: ~ ~C~ ., i . f ,,~ u I .L-=::: ~ I ~ I .-, ,~ . z~ ;11 . J ; - ~. ! w ~~ cc: :) '-' Cl ;;: ...J ; ..-, ~ L1 ..-, ~ _1 ~ ,..-, LJ r-, <0 LJ laaJlS Ja4l0aH u tJ ~ <( .--, ( '" ~ '" :> g.-ri L J u o .., ~ ~ ~ c '" 0 '0 ~tj ~ on 0 ~ c; " 2; '" .. u ,~ ~ --- e l J ~ z QJ '" I " c '" / '" .., 0 -< 0 ....J QJ '" N ~ c I 0 LJ " ....J '" ~ '" " u '" '0' ... '" LJ Q. ., ?;- ;:: \ u ::i ., " 0 u l 1 - VI ... '" ., .s: Vl '0 '" . LJ I- J: '" Z ~ W C5 oj .,; -- = '---'--~ '---~ =:or ""'-'-- ::E > '" n ~ Iii <( ... (6 'HYS'::J) 0 w .s: L1 'oN 'P^18 a>jol puno~ D:: z :; Do Z " ::E :i ..-, rr 0 W W ...J f5 N ...J W 'E '" D:: '" Cl '" ., I- ~ " ;:: Vl - .., ...J J _t1 L1 J J o J '1 u J :] Report for Pine Hills 'l LJ o J J Street Improvements City Project 93-18 n J J J Andover, Minnesota Feb. 1994 File No. 17157 ,.., , u II 1111 Bonestroo .l.JLlJ Rosene n I:] Anderlik & \J\J\l Associates Engineers & Architects St. Paul. Milwaukee 1 u '1 u ,..., LJ n u ~ u ., L1 rt u "f u ,..., u ...., u '"1 u "f U ...., oJ ,..., LJ ,..., oJ " u ,..., u ....., LJ ,..., LJ ,..., u ,..., LJ 11M [1 r] ~ Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Otto G. Bonesrroo, PE, Robert W. Rosene, P.E.* Joseph C Anderlik, P.E Marvin L Sarvala. P.E Richard E. Turner, PE Glenn R. Cook, PE. Thomas E. Noyes. PE Robert G. Schunicht PE. Susan M. Eberlin. CPA. "Senior Consultant Engineers & Architects January 21, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 Re: Pin e Hills Street Improvements City Project No 93-18 File 17157 Dear Mayor and Council: Howard A. Sanford, PE. Keith A. Gordon. PE. Robert R. Pfefferle. PE Richard W. Foster, P.E. David 0. loskora. PE Robert C. Russek. AJ.A. Jerry A. Bourdon, PE. Mark A. Hanson. PE Michael TRautmann. PE Ted K. Field, P:E. Thomas R. Anderson. AJA Donald C. Burgardt P.E Thomas E. Angus, PE Ismae! Martinez. P.E. Michael P. Rau. P.E. Agnes M. Ring. AJCP. Philip 1. Pyne. P.E. Thomas W. Peterson. P.E Michael C. lynch. P.E. James R. Maland. P.E. Jerry D. Pertzsch, PE Scott 1. Arganek, P.E. Kenneth P Anderson, PE Mark R. Rolfs. PE Mark A. Seip, PE. Gary W. Marien. PE. Daniel 1. Edgerton. P.E A. Rick Schmidt PE. Philip 1. Caswell, P.E MarkD. Wallis. PE Miles B. Jensen, PE L PhifJip Gravel. PE. Karen L Wiemeri, P.E. Gary D. Kristofitz, PE E Todd Foster, P.E. Keith R. Yapp. PE. Douglas 1. Benoit, P.E. Shawn D. Gustafson. P:E. Cecilia Olivier, P.E. Paul G. Heuer, P:E John P. Gorder: P:E. Charles A. Erickson lea M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson James F. Engelhardt Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the construction of streets within the Pine Hills Addition south of 161st Avenue between Round Lake Boulevard and Tulip Street. The report contains a detailed cost estimate of the work being proposed and a plan of the area. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council and City Staff at your convenience to review the contents of this report. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4L If 4 Glenn R. Cook, P.E. GRC:rb I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ~~ If ~ Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Date: January 21. 1994 Reg. No. 9451 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, MN 55113 · 612-636-4600 .-, LJ ....., l J Table of Contents ~ u .--, Letter of Transmittal Pal!:e No. 1. J Table of Contents 2. ., ~ Introduction 3. "f Discussion 4. ......1 Project Cost and Assessments 5. ,..., LJ Conclusions & Recommendations 6. r1 Appendix - Cost Estimates u .'"1 Figure No. 1 - Street Construction and Typical Section u ,..., u ...., Ll n u " l_J .., u ,-, LJ .., u ,..., u ..., .....J ,..., LJ Andover Pine Hills Street Improvements 2 " u ......, LJ ~. u " 'J '1 LJ " u " L...J ~ u n u " u ,., '....l f""l LJ ,..., LJ n u ,..., u r-.. u ,.., u ,..., u ,..., LJ Introduction The City of Andover has requested this report to determine the feasibility of constructing the streets within the Pine Hill's Addition, south of 161st Ave. and west of Round Lake Boulevard. The City received a petition from the property owners requesting street improvements in the area. The streets are presently a 22' to 26 foot wide rural section made up of a fine sand and gravel base. The proposed rural section would be a 24 foot wide bituminous surface similar to that constructed in other parts of the City. This section is in accordance with the City standard for a temporary rural residential streets. There are no traffic counts available for the Pine Hills area. An estimate of approximately 210 vehicles for the average daily traffic count may be made assuming that twenty-one of the proposed lots in the area will use the roads and each lot will have 10 trips daily. The streets presently serve a confined residential area. It is anticipated 159th Ave. will be extended to the west to connect with Tulip Street in the future. Soil borings have not been taken in the area. Preliminary investigation indicates a find sand subgrade, we anticipate no additional soil investigation will be necessary prior to construction. The storm water runoff presently drains to the low areas in and along the roadway and percolates into the soil. Existing pipe culverts facilitate this drainage in the ditches along the streets. Andover Pine Hills Street Improvements 3 "f LJ n LJ ~ u r--, u " l J ...., u " u ...., LJ ...., ~ ...., '--1 ...., u -, u ...., ~j '"' L1 ...., J ., u ...., u ...., '--1 n LJ Discussion The construction of streets within the Pine Hill area will first consist of grading and shaping the existing roadway to the design grade and crown. Four inches of Class 5 aggregate base will then be placed over the prepared subgrade. The roadway will then be surfaced with two and one-half inches of bituminous wear course. The proposed rural section will have three foot wide shoulders that consist of topsoil and sod. All existing driveways will be matched with gravel base and/or bituminous surfacing. The construction of ten foot long bituminous driveway aprons off the edge of the pavement is proposed for all existing gravel driveways. The existing centerline and driveway culverts along the roadway will be utilized for drainage. The drainage in all areas will be directed to low areas that presently have storm water draining to them. The overall storm sewer plan for the area has not been implemented. The existing system is currently working satisfactorily and no problems have been identified. Sodding with topsoil is proposed for the majority of the lawn areas that will be disrupted by the road construction. For the purpose of creating an alternative with a reduced project cost, we have provided a cost estimate that excludes all sodding. This alternative provides for the restoration with seeding and mulch, utilizing borrowed topsoil. Andover Pine Hills Street Improvements 4 r--, LJ n u 'I '---1 u n u ~ ~ ..-, LJ ~ ~ ..., "-' ~ '---1 n '---1 n u " L1 r> u ,....., u n u n u " u n ~ Project Costs and Assessments The project costs for the street improvements are outlined in this section. The itemized cost estimates are provided in the appendix and include a 5 percent contingency; 18 percent for legal, engineering and administration and 5 percent for bonding and capitalized interest. The indicated unit prices are as projected for the 1994 construction season. (ENR5450 Mpls.) Estimated Project Cost $117,250 Alternate: Project Cost with seeding (in lieu of sodding) $111,525 The project costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners adjacent the streets on a unit basis. There are 20 lots along the streets which are proposed to be assessed, with one lot that is proposed to be assessed two units. The cost per unit for the improvement based on 21 assessable units is $5,585.00, the cost per unit for the seeding alternative is $5,310.00. Andover Pine Hills Street Improvements 5 " LJ n LJ Conclusions and Recommendations ~ u ,..., The project as reviewed herein is feasible as it relates to general engineering principals and construction procedures. Based on information contained in this report, it is recommended that: u " u 1. This report be adopted by the City of Andover as a guide for construction of the street improvements. "f -.....J .-, 2. The City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project prior to a public hearing. ;..j ,....., -.....J 3. A public hearing be held to determine further action to be taken. The property owners adjacent to the roadway should be notified for hearing purposes. n u " 4. The following schedule be implemented for the project: u n Receive preliminary report Hold public hearing Order plans and specifications Approve plans and specifications Bid date February 15, 1994 March 15, 1994 March 15, 1994 April 19, 1994 May 13, 1994 June 7, 1994 June 20, 1994 August 31, 1994 u " u ,..., u Award contract Start construction n u Complete construction ,..., u ,..., LI " u n u n Andover Pine Hills Street Improvements 6 u n lJ n u Appendix Cost Estimates Proposed Street Improvements Pine Hills Addition ~ LJ n u ...., u "f Unit Estimated Estimated Item Unit Price Quantity Cost Base preparation SY 1.00 13,525 $ 13,525.00 Class 5 aggregate base 1N 6.50 3,300 21,450.00 Type 41 bituminous wear material 1N 15.00 1,900 28,500.00 AC-l bituminous material for mixture 1N 130.00 115 14,950.00 Remove bituminous surfacing SY 2.00 200 400.00 Driveway restoration SY 7.50 200 1,500.00 Sod SY 2.00 3,700 7,400.00 Topsoil borrow CY 8.00 300 2.400.00 Subtotal $ 90,125.00 + 5% Contingency 4,505.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 94,630.00 + 18% Legal, Engr., & Admin. 17.035.00 $111,665.00 + 5% Bonding and Capital Interest 5.585.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $117,250.00 '--J .-, u ~ ~ ...., ~ n u n LJ n LJ ,..., I 1 " u ,..., u ......, Alternate u Total Project Cost w/Seeding (in lieu of sodding) $111,525.00 .-, u ,..., u n u Andover Pine Hills Street Improvements 7 ..., u ,..., u " I J --------- ----- ____a " U \ ,-----..- II II II II I, i i Vi !I .9- !i ~ Ii .. II Ii .. .. ...., U "f '..J ..., u ...., . ) EX. CVL'o'ERT 161s1 Ave. N.W. I !!L ------ -:::.::.:::..:::-:..::::::::::-:..::::-::.::..:::-:..:::::....-------------..--------------------------------' \:- (M.S.A.S. No. 106) -----------..--------..-------------;] ,r- 1 8 2 i I 'I II II II il II I i I 2 -g ffi " "'" o -' " C " o 0: 7 <D 3i :Z Vi '" o " o 3 ~ :Z ......;;,~......... ......;€-;"...... .3 .....-;\~..." .......c."~...... /_-;'~'io~'" ..."..,~~;~...... - -- Vi 6 5 --, ~ ----------------, W ----_____________ - 3 .. .. I: II 6 ...J " u .-, u " LJ n u n l J n u .., u ..., u 5 ! I 1591 Ave. N.W. 0) 2 TYPICAL SECTION 2-1/2" BIT. WEAR MATERIAL, TYPE 41 4" CLASS 5 AGG. BASE 2" TOPSOIL SHOULDER STREET IMPROVEMENTS ,..., u ANDOVER, MINNESOTA PINE HILLS ADDITION FIGURE CITY PROJECT 93-18 J!]j Bonestroo Rosene G Anderlik & 1\11 Associates " u 17157R2 FEB. 1994 COMM. 17157 ~ ~ -j u ~ L.J FEASIBiliTY REPORT ..., , oJ. .., u .., w WOODLAND CREEK 4TH ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT 93-31 ANDOVER, MINNESOTA .., ..j -; -..J .., u .., ~ .., -' .., -' .., ...J -, -' COMM. NO.1 0588 .., -' -, .j -, ...J TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PlAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE:6121292-4400 FAX:6121292-0083 -, ..J ~ .J ...., ...J "f ...J TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS-PLA.NNERS ...J -, ...J ...., ...J FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR ...., ..j WOODLAND CREEK 4TH ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS -, ...J CITY PROJECT 93-31 -, _J ANDOVER, MINNESOTA -, COMMISSION NO.1 0588 ,j -, ...J -, .....J -, .J -, SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 15, 1994 I hereby certify that this Feasibility Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ~#L- Thomas A. Syfko, P.E. /, Registration No. 15266 ...J -, J "f .J -, .....J -, _1 --, ..j 'f ...J 10588 ...., LJ ..., ..J Project Overview ...., u Overview Description Page ...., i.J Location Woodland Creek 4th Addition NE 1/4 of Section 32-32-24 1 M LJ Proposed Improvements 28 Single Family Lots 1 Sanitary Sewer, Watennain, Stonn Sewor, rr Street Construction and Restoration u Initiation Petition! Andover City Council Action 3 ~ LJ Feasibility The project is feasible. 3 ,.., Right-of-way/Easements To be platted. Additional utility and 3 u drainage easements may be required. ,.., Permits MPCA, MWCC, Anoka County, Department of 3 u Health, DNR, Corps of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District ...., u Completion 1994 Construction Season 3 ,.., Estimated Project Cost $339,000.00 (including City Trunk Watermain 3 u $6,280.00) ....., Estimated Assessable Lateral and Trunk Costs 4 Cost and Rate including typical lot assessments u Calculations Unit Basis: ,.., $11,893.62 Lateral Assessment Rate $13,313.62 Lateral and Trunk Rate u Proposed Project 6 ....., Time Schedule ~j Estimated Construction Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Stonn Sewer, 7 ,.., Costs Street Construction and Restoration u ,.., Location Maps Overall Sanitary Sewer, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street u ...., LJ ,.., ;.J .., 10588 LJ ....., --J -, -1 I WOODLAND CREEK 4TH ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT 93.31 -1 -, CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA --J --, Location --J --, The proposed improvement covers the 4th Addition of the subdivision known as Woodland Creek, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 32-32-24 in the City of Andover, Minnesota. The fourth phase is located east of the Northglen plat, north of the Woodland plat and west of the Woodland 2nd Addition plat. The fourth addition includes 28 single family lots. --J '1 --J --, Proposed Improvements -1 1. Sanitary Sewer " --J It is proposed to extend 8" sanitary sewer throughout the plat from the existing sewer main located at the South end of Orchid Street NW, as shown on Drawing No.1. -. --J --, AI/ residential lots will be served by 4" PVC services with a 4" PVC vertical cleanout located at the property line. --J 2. Watermaln --, . J It is proposed to construct 12" DIP watermain along 140th Avenue NW from an existing 12" stub (constructed under the Northglen Project), eastward to Orchid Street NW. .. .J It is proposed to construct 10" DIP watermain along Orchid Street NW from an existing 10" stub (constructed under the Woodland Creek Project) northward to 140th Avenue NW. --, .J --, A 10" DIP watermain will be extended from the intersection of 140th Avenue NW and Orchid Street NW to the northeast for future use. --1 J It is proposed to construct 8" DIP watermain along 139th Lane NW from an existing stub located at Marigold Street NW to Orchid Street NW; along Narcissus Street NW from 139th Lane NW to 140th Avenue NW; and along 140th Avenue from an existing stub located at the east edge of the plat to Orchid Street NW (See Drawing No.2 for Watermain layout). -, J -, , J -, -1- 10588 ---, --J , ..J -, c-.-J --1 "f --J ---, --J ---, --1 ---, --1 .. --1 ......, --1 ~, --1 "' .J .. .J "1 --1 -, --1 -, j --. j -1 j -, 3. All residential lots will be served by 1 II copper services, with curb stops located at the property line. Fire hydrants will also be installed at appropriate locations. Storm Sewer Surface water within this plat will be controlled with storm sewers and ponds. All storm sewer sizing and catch basin spacing is based on a 10-year design storm frequency. Emergency overflow outlets must be provided at all low areas to provide overflow protection of homes for storms more intense than that used for design of the storm sewer collection system. Surface water from this plat would be collected by storm sewers at the following intersections: A. Orchid Street NW and 139th Lane NW. B. Orchid Street NW and 140th Avenue NW. C. Orchid Street NW and 140th Avenue NW 4. It is proposed to drain the three intersections to the northeast of the intersection of Orchid Street NW and 140th Avenue NW to an existing series of ponds and storm sewers located within the Woodland Creek Golf Course property. Streets Streets are proposed to be constructed to Andover City Standards of 32-foot width (face to face of curb) and concrete curb and gutter. The street section shall be as follows: 1" Bituminous Wearing Surface 1-1/2" Bituminous Base Course 4" Class 5 Aggregate Base The bituminous wearing course shall be placed next year as part of a combined City paving project. It is assumed that all street areas will be graded to within 0.2 feet of the designed subgrade elevation prior to utility and street construction by the developer. The road shall have a 6-inch crown with 0.5% minimum grade and 7% maximum grade. Grades within 30 feet of street intersections shall not exceed 3%. Boulevards are proposed to have a positive 2% grade from the back of curb to the property line. Beyond the property line, the maximum boulevard slope shall be 4:1. -2- 10588 -, ~ 'I - ) Initiation 'I The project was initiated by petition of Woodland Development, Inc., the owner and developer of the project. and Andover City Council action. -J ..., --l Feasibility The project is feasible. ..., -J -, Rlght-of-way/Easements -1 ..., All right-of-way and easements are proposed to be dedicated as part of the platting process. Additional utility and drainage easements may be required based upon final design. ~ -, ~ Permits -, Permits will be required from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) for sanitary sewer extensions, from the Minnesota Department of Health for watermain extensions, and from the Coon Creek Watershed District, from the Department of Natural. Resources and/or Corps of Engineers for drainage improvements and work within watershed control of wetland protection areas. ~ ., ~ - , -J Completion 1994 Construction Season ..., .J -, Estimated Project Cost _ J -, Included in this report is a detailed estimate of construction costs for the street and utility improvements. The costs quoted herein are estimates only and not guaranteed prices. Rnal contracts will be awarded on a unit price basis. The Contractor will be paid only for work completed. ~ --, ~ " ~ -, ....J --l -, -3- 10588 J ---, ...J ---, ...J The estimated costs for Woodland Creek 4th Addition, Project 93-31, are as follows: ---, Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Streets and Restoration $71,300.00 72,300.00 .. 40,900.00 76.500.00 $261,000.00 $52,200.00 7,900.00 7,900.00 10.000.00 $339,000.00 ....J -, ....J ---, Total Estimated Construction Cost ...J Engineering Legal Fiscal Administration ---, ....J ---, Total Estimated Project Cost --.J ---, .. City Share Trunk Watermain ($4,830.00) included. _J Estimated Assessable Cost .., _J The assessments are proposed to be based on a per unit cost for all lateral and trunk benefit. The assessable project cost includes the estimated project cost for sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and street construction. .-, --J Trunk sanitary sewer and watermain connection and area charges are proposed to be assessed under this project based on the 1994 rates established by the City of Andover: ---, --J ---, Trunk Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge Trunk Watermain Connection Charge Trunk Sanitary Sewer Area Charge Trunk Watermain Area Charge $275.00/Unit $1,145.00/Unit $995.00/Acre $1,058.00/Acre ...J ...., _J ---, Rate Calculation - Woodland Creek 4th Addition ...J 1. Sanitary Sewer Rate Lateral Benefit ($71,300.00) x 1.3 = Lateral Sanitary Sewer Rate = $92,690.00/28 Lots = $92,690.00 3,310.36 ...., ---.J ---, j -, j -, J ~, -4- 10588 J .. u " L.J 2. Watermaln Rate Lateral Benefit ($72,300 - $4,830) x 1.3 $87,711.00 Lateral Watermain Rate = $87,711/28 Lots = $3,132.54 3. Storm Sewer Rate Lateral Benefit ($40,900 x 1.3) = $53,170.00 Lateral Storm Sewer Rate = $53,170/28 Lots $1,898.93 4. Street and Restoration Rate Lateral Benefit ($76,500 x 1.3) = $99,450.00 Lateral Street & Restoration Rate ($99,450/28 Lots) $3,551.79 5. Trunk Sanitary Sewer Area Rate Previously Assessed with Phase I Construction $O.OO/Unit 6. Trunk Watermaln Area Rate Previously Assessed with Phase I Construction $O.OO/Unit " LJ .. u .-, LJ ...., L.J .. LJ ,..., u .. I. ; ,...., u Woodland Creek 4th Addition - Estimated Cost per Lot -. Sanitary Sewer Lateral Watermain Lateral Storm Sewer Lateral Street and Restoration $3,310.36 $3,132.54 $1,898.93 $3.551.79 L.J .. u Total Lateral Benefit per Lot $11,893.62 ...., Sanitary Trunk Connection Charge Watermain Trunk Connection Charge $275.00 $1.145.00 LJ "f Subtotal - Connection Charges per Lot $1,420.00 ~j .., Trunk Sanitary Sewer Area Rate Trunk Watermain Area Rate $0.00 $0.00 u .. Estimated Total of Trunk and Lateral Assessments $13,313.62 I J .. u "f u ,..., -5- 10588 u -. --J -. --J PROPOSED PROJECT TIME SCHEDULE --, Woodland Creek 4th Addition Utility and Street Improvements City Project 93-31 City of Andover, Minnesota Commission No. 10588 --J -, --J ~ --J -. 1. City Council Receives Feasibility Report February 15, 1994 2. City Council Waives Public Hearing February 15, 1994 3. City Council Orders Project and Authorizes Engineer to Prepare Plans and Specifications February 15, 1994 4. Engineer Submits Plans for Council Approval and Receives Authorization to Advertise for Bids . April 19, 1994 5. Advertise in Official Newspaper April 22 and 29, 1994 6. Advertise in Construction Bulletin April 22 and 29, 1994 7. Open Bids May 13, 1994 8. City Council Receives Bids and Awards Contract May 17,1994 9. Contractor Begins Construction May 30, 1994 10. Contractor Completes Construction 1994 Construction Season --J -. --J -, -.J --, _1 " --J -, _ J --, _ J -, -, _ 1 -. -, J -, J -, J -, -6- 10588 j -, . j -, --1 -, ---.J -, --1 -, --1 -, . J -, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 --1 ...., ---.J -, ...J -, ---.J -, .J --, . j -, _ J --, _ J --, ---.J -, J -, J --, J -, J PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Woodland Creek 4th Addition Utility and Street Improvements City Project 93-31 City of Andover, Minnesota Commission No. 10588 SANITARY SEWER Item No. Description Mobilization Connect to Existing Stub 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 10-12' 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 12-14' 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 14-16' 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 16-18' 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 18-20' 8" DIP Class 50 SS 10-12' Standard 4' Diameter Manhole 0-10' Extra Depth Sanitary Manhole 8" Outside Drop 8" x 4" PVC SDR 35 Wye Branch 4" PVC SDR 35 Vertical Cleanout 4" PVC SDR 35 San. Sewer Service Trench Stabilization Televise Sanitary Sewer Lines Quantity 1.0 LS 1.0 EA 1,150.0 LF 30.0 LF 400.0 LF 210.0 LF 140.0 LF 40.0 LF 10.0 EA 28.0 LF 2.0 EA 28.0 EA 28.0 EA 850.0 LF 300.0 LF 1.0 LS Estimated Construction Cost - Sanitary Sewer Contingencies Estimated Construction Cost -7- Unit Price $5,000.00 400.00 14.00 17.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 25.00 1,100.00 100.00 1,000.00 45.00 50.00 7.50 5.00 1.000.00 Amount $5,000.00 400.00 16,100.00 510.00 7,200.00 4,200.00 3,080.00 1,000.00 11,000.00 2,800.00 2,000.00 1,260.00 1,400.00 6,375.00 1,500.00 1.000.00 $64,825.00 6.475.00 $71,300.00 10588 -, -J ---, -J PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE -, Woodland Creek 4th Addition -J Utility and Street Improvements City Project 93-31 -.. City of Andover, Minnesota . J Commission NO.1 0588 -, WATERMAIN -J Item Unit -, No. Description Quantitv Price Amount -J 1 Connect to Existing WM 4.0EA $300.00 $1,200.00 -, 2 6" DIP Class 50 Watermain 75.0 LF 12.00 900.00 . 1 3 8" DIP Class 50 Watermain 1,350.0 LF 14.00 18,900.00 4 10" DIP Class 50 Watermain 840.0 LF 17.00 14,280.00 -.. 5 12" DIP Class 50 Watermain 170.0 LF 22.00 3,740.00 -J 6 6" MJ Res. Seat Gate Valve 5.0 EA 450.00 2,250.00 7 8" MJ Res. Seat Gate Valve 7.0 EA 550.00 3,850.00 -, 8 10" MJ Butterfly Valve 2.0 EA 800.00 1,600.00 --l 9 12" MJ Butterfly Valve 1.0 EA 1,000.00 1,000.00 10 Hydrant 5.0EA 1,100.00 5,500.00 -, 11 MJ DIP Fittings 1,550.0 LB 1.50 2,325.00 12 1" Corporation Stop 28.0 EA 45.00 1,260.00 -J 13 1" Curb Stop and Box 28.0 EA 60.00 1,680.00 -, 14 1" Tyoe K Copoer Water Service 910.0 LF 8.00 7.280.00 -J Subtotal $65,765.00 -, Contingencies 6.535.00 . J Estimated Construction Cost $72,300.00 "f City Share for Pipe Overs/zing .1 1 0" DIP in lieu of 8" DIP 840.0 LF $3.00 $2,520.00 -, 12" DIP in lieu of 8" DIP 170.0 LF 8.00 1,360.00 .J 10" Valve in lieu of 8" Valve 2.0 EA 250.00 500.00 12" Valve in lieu of 8" Valve 1.0 EA 450.00 450.00 -, -J Total City Share $4,830.00 -, --.J --, J .., J , -8- 10588 J -, -J -, -J -, _ 1 --, -J -, -J "f -J -, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 -J -, -J -, _J ......, . 1 -, -J ..., . J ..., -J --, _1 -, --1 -, _J --, -~ --, J ~ -1 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Woodland Creek 4th Addition Utility and Street Improvements City Project 93-31 City of Andover, Minnesota Commission No.1 0588 STORM SEWER Item No. Description 12" RCP Class 5 Storm Sewer 15" RCP Class 5 Storm Sewer 18" RCP Class 5 Storm Sewer 21" RCP Class 3 Storm Sewer 24" RCP Class 3 Storm Sewer 24" RCP Flared End Section 4' Diameter Catch Basin/Manhole Standard Catch Basin Cable Concrete Silt Fence Soddin<} Subtotal Contingencies Estimated Construction Cost Quantitv 80.0 LF 40.0 LF 700.0 LF 80.0 LF 250.0 LF 1.0 EA 9.0EA 2.0 EA 192.0 SF 100.0 LF 65.0 SY -9- Unit Price 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 800.00 1,000.00 900.00 7.00 3.00 3.00 Amount $1,280.00 720.00 14,000.00 1,760.00 6,000.00 800.00 9,000.00 1,800.00 1,344.00 300.00 195.00 37,199.00 3.701.00 $40,900.00 10588 "1 _ J -, _1 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE -, Woodland Creek 4th Addition Utility and Street Improvements City Project 93-31 City of Andover, Minnesota Commission No.1 0588 _J -, .....J -, STREETS AND RESTORATION .....J ---, Item No. Description _1 -, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Common Borrow Common Excavation Subgrade Preparation Surmountable Curb and Gutter B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter Concrete Valley Gutter Class 5 Aggregate Base Bituminous Wear Course Seedin9 Subtotal Contingencies .....J .. .....J ---, .J -, .j .-, Estimated Construction Cost .....J ---, . J "1 --J "1 -1 -, _ J -, j -, J 1 J 1 j Quantity 570.0 CY 570.0 CY 22.0 RS 3,870.0 LF 250.0 LF 1.0 EA 1,950.0 TN 1,125.0TN 1.5 AC -10- Unit Price 3.00 2.00 100.00 5.00 6.00 1,500.00 7.00 24.00 1.000.00 Amount $1,710.00 1,140.00 2,220.00 19,350.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 13,650.00 27,000.00 1.500.00 69,570.00 6.930.00 $76,500.00 10588 L-J L..J t=J LJ ~I ::0' - C) 0 r 01 I en :-I z ;el __..J L=.J L.-J L-J E....==l E::=:l L.J LJ LJ L-J E:=.l e=.J LJ LJ LJ E=:! (JJ CD . U1 ~ I I \...!~Oth AV. N.E. U1 r-- --- 1 I I I J- m ) N / I / N N en (JJ ~ l39th__L I NE N. W UI --, I I o N ,-- I~ l~ ,en ,en I: r:....., If CD --- ~.. ... - .. ---...... .... ~;B enS6 0 ::!o zen (i)J'T'I g 2: 0>0 = 0>- en - r l>(J) ITI Zl> -: 8 Z II en' R J'T'Ien ~~ J'T'IJ'T'I N :0:0 N I c 8 ::0 I G) I . ! I I I I ~ 0 l> c 0 (") r () enz =i--i l> J>O -<3:F z 0 ZO 0 3: "'0- -< "'O::o-i () 3: ~rTl ::00-< :::0 . Z :::0::0 o<l> rTl -<.. '-rTlz ITI 0 .~ 1T13:0 ^ . (1)- - rTlz ~~(I) ~ 0 :ez ::r 01 rTlrTl (D-i-i CD ::o~ OIcn:::o l> CD , rTl 0 ~ 01 rTl 0 - -i - -i - 0 z o ~ . I\) ~, ::0' - C> o ~ r 01 CD. I CJ) - :-I z ~l ------------ I , - ~ I IT1 II R IT1 1< 0: o g 8 ~ N ~ o o l> ("') c: r ("') Z =i - -I l> o<=g-<~E~ 3: ~ < ""0 ::0 -I ("') ~ ;; ITl ::0 0 -< ::0 n1 ..:0 -0 < l> n1 ~ ::0 3: IT; ITl Z ~ . 3: Z ("') 3: 0 O~Z-l~cn~ 01 ITl W -I -I =r en (J) ()J (f)::O l> CD 0, lTlo ~ ~ ~ 0 =f - o z . E::::=.i L.J L=J E::=::J ~, I I , :0' ~I I I 01 I C/) :-f z ~l __..J (J) g r rTl II 8_ ~ G') . ~ E:=J E:::::l E::=::J LJ L.J L...J L...J L...J LJ t 1 L.J LJ LJ LJ L.=J N I\) o ~ o o J>(') Cr n Z =i--I J> o g-<~E~ ~ -IC/) < -0 :0 j (') :::. fTl:o 0 - :::0 Z ~ ..::0 -0 < l> fTl P I"Tl ~ ::n~~ ~ Ouj~~~cn~ 01 fTl <D -I -I =r (X) C/) OJ (/):::0 J> (X) 0, fTlO ~ ~ ~ 2 -I - o :z g 8 ~ N Lj I-I ~ L-' s: I I ]>. , :xJ' - G) 0 . r I o. I (J) :-f z ~: __..J L-' L-J l..=l L=.) LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ (=.J L.J LJ l_J LJ L...-J m N ~L (Jl I 139th LINE N.W I .-J I -- -- -- I --, ,-- --, r~ N 1- CJI I l~ I .0 I 0 I '" l~ N (J) ()J ,(J) :-f - ,(J) N I J: <.D r- j2 ~ ~ r-'f ()J --- /A~ CD --........ .. ~ ... I .~ (Jl ~ I I --~ ,-l~Oth AV. N.E. .... --- -.,J (Jl --- N N 0 lJ) 8 g I /'T1 -. 8 II 8. 8 N 0 ~ . ()I ~ ]> c 0 (") r (") z =i--i ]> 0 en 0 -<3:F z 3: d 0 "'0- 0 < "'O:::o-i (") ;: ::0 m ::00-< ::0 . ::0 zS: 0<]> rr1 .. 3: c:...mz m Ocn - ms:o ^ . IT1 Z ~~cn * o:E Z U11T1 m w-i-i ~ 00::0 (J) UJ(J):::tJ ]> 00 0 , m ~ UJ m 0 - --i 0 - -i - 0 z