HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK - March 27, 2012A C I T Y 0 F
NAD 06 1 Y ' Yet'
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
City Council Workshop
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Conference Rooms A & B
1. Call to Order — 6:00 p.m.
2. Joint Meeting with Planning Commission
a. Interim Use Permits
3. 2011 -2012 Council Goals Update and Discussion - Administration
4. 2012 -2013 Capital Improvement Plan Progress Update — Administration
5. 2013 -2017 Capital Improvement Plan Discussion — Administration
6. 2012 General Fund Budget Progress Report - Administration
7. February 2012 City Investment Report - Administration
8. Discuss 2013 Budget Development Guidelines - Administration
9. Other Topics
10. Adjournment
A I T Y O F
DOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David L. Carlberg, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Interim Use Permits - Planning
DATE: March 27, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The City Council and Planning Commission are requested to discuss the
implementation of Interim Use Permit (IUP) regulations in the City Code.
DISCUSSION
701
The EDA and City Council have discussed the operation of a U -Haul rental
business at the Stop N Shop convenience store located at 13725 Crosstown Drive
NW. Through these discussions the idea of allowing this type of use as an interim
use was explored. The City Council found this issue to be a topic that should be
jointly discussed with the Planning Commission. In addition, other uses currently
permitted under the granting of a Conditional Use Permit such as mining, land
reclamation, temporary classrooms, and other uses that the City as a condition
establishes a sunset clause, a date of expiration.
Interim use Permits (IUP)
The purpose and intent of an IUP is to allow a use within any zoning district for a
limited period of time that reasonably utilizes the property where it is not
reasonable to utilize it in a manner provided in the Comprehensive Plan and/or to
allow a use that is presently acceptable but that, with anticipated development or
changes, will not be acceptable in the future. Attached for discussion purposes is a
draft of language on IUP's that could be added to the City Code.
ACTION REQUESTED
Review and discuss the request and direct staff on how to proceed.
Attachments
Example Ordinance Language regulating Interim Use Permits
Respectfully submitted,
J -�
David L. Carlberg
INTERIM USE PERMITS
(A) Purpose. The purpose and intent of allowing interim uses is:
(1) To allow a use within any zoning district for a limited period of time that
reasonably utilizes the property where it is not reasonable to utilize it in the
manner provided in the Comprehensive Plan;
(2) To allow a use that is presently acceptable but that, with anticipated
development or other changes, will not be acceptable in the future.
(3) To allow a use for a brief period of time until a permanent location is obtained
or while the permanent location is under construction.
(B) Application and procedures. The application, public hearing, public notice and
procedural requirements for interim use permits shall be the same as those for conditional
use permits as provided in 12 -14 -6.
(C) Standards. The Planning Commission shall recommend an interim use permit and the
Council shall issue such interim use permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed
location:
(1) Meets the standards of a conditional use permit set forth in 12 -14 -6;
(2) Will terminate upon a date or event that can be identified with certainty;
(3) Will not impose, by agreement, additional costs on the public if it is necessary
for the public to take the property in the future;
(4) Will be subjected to, by agreement with the owner, any conditions that the City
Council has deemed appropriate for permission of the use, including a
condition that the owner will provide an appropriate financial surety to cover
the cost of removing the interim use and any interim structures upon the
expiration of the interim use permit.
(D) Termination. An interim use permit shall terminate upon the occurrence of any of the
following events; whichever occurs first:
(1) The date or event stated in the permit; or
(2) A violation of conditions under which the permit was issued; or
(3) A change in the city's zoning regulations which renders the use non -
conforming; or
(4) The use has been discontinued for six months.
�6
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2011 -2012 Council Goals Update
DATE: March 27, 2012
INTRODUCTION
On June 7, 2011 the City Council adopted the City of Andover 2011 -2012 Goals and Values. The values
and goals were summarized into the following categories:
1. Fiscal
2. Commercial/Residential Development/Redevelopment
3. Collaboration
4. Service Delivery
5. Livability /Image
DISCUSSION
At the meeting, City Administration will make a brief presentation summarizing progress being made on
the 2011 -2012 Goals and Values.
ACTION REQUESTED
Receive a brief presentation, review and discuss the progress being made on the 2011 -2012 Council
Goals and Values, and discuss the process for developing 2012 -2013 Council Goals and Values
City of Andover
2011 -2012 Goals and Values
Adopted June 7, 2011
Fiscal Values:
Statement: The City recognizes the following fiscal values as the basis for delivering
current and future services to the residents of Andover.
1. Assure city financial stability through cost effective services.
2. Focus spending on community needs; wants need to be supported by new or redirected
sustainable revenues.
3. Explore new revenue streams.
4. Don't commit dollars today that will commit the City to unsustainable future expenses.
Progress Report:
The 2011 budget completed the year with both positive revenue and expenditure
variances. The 2012 Budget was developed with specific guidelines that were adopted by
the City Council and is being implemented following Administrative directives consistent
with the adopted Fiscal Values.
Looking forward the City continually is analyzing services and current and future
infrastructure improvements to determine sustainability.
.. V,/
City of Andover
2011 -2012 Goals and Values
Adopted June 7, 2011
Commercial/Residential Development/Redevelopment Goals:
Value statement: The City wants to be supportive of those invested in or wanting to be
invested in our community.
1. Review TIF district expirations; discuss future planning and options available which may
include the creation of new TIF Districts.
2. Facilitate upgrades or redevelopment of blighted or underdeveloped
commercial /industrial parcels.
3. Help stimulate business growth in Andover through more business friendly municipal
costs, regulations and support programs.
4. Develop a business outreach plan to improve City relationships with the business
community.
5. Analyze existing commercial areas to determine if expansion is feasible and seek out new
areas to serve the community.
6. Continually evaluate how to meet sewer /water needs of any proposed development
projects.
7. Review City development review processes to reduce unnecessary development costs
Progress Report:
The TIF districts status is reviewed continually with the EDA. The EDA has also started
the process to acquire blighted properties making way for future redevelopment options.
The City Council has eased signage restrictions, has agreed to reduce commercial water
utility connection charges, has initiated a retail market analysis, and is currently
considering an additional TIF District to facility a senior housing project.
City Staff has increased involvement with the local chambers of commerce and is
continually making efforts to get out and visit business owners to determine their needs.
The Anoka Area Chamber relationship is very positive; the Metro North Chamber
relationship is still being cultivated.
Relative to evaluating sewer /water needs of proposed development, the primary
involvement has been offering municipal service at the time of reconstruction of
roadways.
KJ
City of Andover
2011 -2012 Goals and Values
Adopted June 7, 2011
Collaboration Goals:
Value statement: The City is supportive of collaboration efforts that are cost - effective
and improve efficiency in delivering services.
1. Rethink how we deliver existing basic city services and seek lower cost with increased
productivity.
2. New collaboration opportunities must be a win -win for the participating cities.
3. Continue to work on developing working relationships with: school district, county, and
adjoining cities; the goal being to reduce costs, improve delivery of services, and be as
efficient as possible.
4. Work with waste /garbage haulers to determine if a more efficient garbage collection
process for the community can be achieved.
Progress Report:
Administrative directives for the 2011& 2012 budget and the Council adopted 2012
budget development guidelines for 2011 & 2012 stress seeking out efficient and cost
effective services.
The City is pursuing collaborative opportunities with the County, School Districts, and
neighboring cities. City Administration is currently working with the County to
determine if the County Facility Maintenance Management System could provide
efficiencies to the City.
"4
City of Andover
2011 -2012 Goals and Values
Adopted June 7, 2011
Service Delivery Goals:
Value statement: The City is committed to providing efficient and cost - effective city
services.
1. Determine if the City should reduce maintenance on parks not used or useable for cost
savings; consider elimination of tot lots; focus development on larger parks and an
expanded trail system.
2. Review the City relationships with the local sports associations to help provide for
exceptional program delivery to the community.
3. Pursue paperless opportunities whenever possible and feasible.
4. Analyze the "administrative fine" process to reduce use of courts, increase local
revenues, and improve code compliance.
S. Explore opportunities with law enforcement to improve community policing.
6. Pursue local programming during summer or school days for the community youth by
effective utilization of the Community Center and the City's relationships with local
service organizations.
7. Continually review our processes to reduce unnecessary or unwanted service deliveries.
8. Discuss employee salaries and the review process with the budget development process,
this should include reviewing salary ranges, cost of living adjustments (COLA),
longevity, and merit based pay.
Progress Report.
The Park Commission along with City Staff is evaluating all City Park properties to
determine future uses and improvements. Along with this process the Park Commission
has invited the local sports associations and neighborhoods to participate in the process.
A task force was created to explore whether or not artificial turf is an option for the City
to consider to enhance and /or expand the current field offerings.
The City is currently pursuing a paperless City Council packet and City Staff is
continually encouraged to use electronic meanings of communication to limit paper use,
although we realize there still is a need or a requirement for paper options too.
City Administration and the City Attorney have been researching administrative fines and
will make a presentation to the City Council during the 2013 budget development
process.
r
Service Delivery Goals (continued):
As part of the 2012 budget process the City expanded the law enforcement contract to
include an additional investigator to help with investigations and to pursue community
policing in current "hot spots " within the community.
The City Council as part of the 2012 budget supported a teen after- school program with
the YMCA. This program in conjunction with the Youth First program is intended to
start meeting the early teen programming needs within the community.
Employee salaries are annually evaluated; comparisons with other comparable
communities are showing the City is competitive. City Administration is evaluating a
conversion to PTO (paid time oft) versus the current sick and vacation leave program.
6
City of Andover
2011 -2012 Goals and Values
Adopted June 7, 2011
Livabilit- Oxnage Goals:
Value statement: The City recognizes that providing quality basic & desired services
enhances the quality of life of our residents.
1. Pursue preserving open space when viable and feasible opportunities are available.
2. Continue efforts along Hanson Boulevard with promoting sustainable landscape.
3. Determine if the Livable Communities Program is a viable program for Andover.
4. Determine if Metro Transit can be expanded into Andover.
5. Be creative in improving and adding amenity options for the residents of Andover.
6. Review recent 2010 Census data and use for planning future projects.
Progress Report:
The Open Space Commission continues to evaluate properties as options for the City to
purchase as part of the Open Space Referendum program. Minimal development has
occurred so not much activity has taken place through the development process to
preserve open space.
The City continues to monitor the past sustainable landscape plantings and continues to
pursue property owners along Hanson Boulevard to expand the landscape offering. The
Great River Substation landscape improvements were completed the summer of 2011.
Met Council representatives were at a Council workshop and presented the benefits of
participating in the Livable Communities Program. No decision to participate was made.
Updated 2010 Census data is being used as a tool for economic development marketing.
!.tLNDOVEK
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator / Finance Direct
FROM: Lee Brezinka, Assistant Finance Director
SUBJECT: 2012 — 2013 CIP Update
DATE: March 27, 2012
(763) 755 -5100
INTRODUCTION
Attached is an update of the 2012 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects and equipment purchases. Also
attached is a list of 2013 planned equipment purchases discussed during the bond sale process.
DISCUSSION
The Andover City Council, as part of the October 18, 2011 Council meeting, officially adopted the 2012 -
2016 Capital Improvement Plan and on December 6, 2011 adopted the 2012 Annual Operating Budget that
included $359,000 for General Obligation Equipment Notes planned for purchasing Public Safety and Public
Works equipment.
As referenced during the presentation for the bond sale, it was determined to include some of the equipment
planned for 2013 in the 2012 bond sale to take advantage of low interest rates and to eliminate the need to do
an additional bond in 2013 saving additional underwriting fees. Attached are the CIP description sheets for
the 2013 equipment proposed to be part of the 2012 bond sale.
BUDGET IMPACT
The equipment purchases were part of the 2012 — 2016 Capital Improvement Plan.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Andover City Council is requested to review the attached equipment list and consider authorizing staff to
start the procurement process for acquiring the 2013 equipment attached.
Respectfully submitted,
Lee Brezinka
Attachments: 2012 Project Updates
2013 CIP Equipment Description Sheets
CITY OF ANDOVER
2012 Capital Improvement Plan
Project Updates
Engineering
New Development Projects
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
Bunker Lake Blvd Trail
Facility Management
Surface Seal All Brick Structures
Annual Parking Lot Maintenance
Fire
Replacement - Fire Chiefs Vehicle
Replacement - Rescue #11
Replacement - Hydraulic Rescue Cutters
New - Thermal Imaging Cameras
Information Technology
Springbrook Version 7
Park & Recreation - Operations
Replace /Repair Play Structures - Various Parks
Replace /Repair Major Park Projects - Various Parks
New - Cab and Snow Blower Attachment
New - Trail Plow Attachment
Replacement -10 Ft wide Trail Mower #583
Sunshine Park - Parking Lot Security Lighting
Park & Recreation - Projects
Annual Miscellaneous Projects
Sunshine Park - West Parking Lot
Hickory Meadows
Irrigation Project - Small
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary Sewer Extensions
Radio System Upgrade
Storm Sewer
Storm Sewer Improvements
Streets / Highways
Annual Street Seal Coat Project
Annual Street Crack Seal Project
Annual Street Reconstruction
Annual Pavement Markings
Annual Curb Replacement
Municipal State Aid Routes / New & Reconstruct
Intersection Upgrades
New - Front End Loader
Water
Rehabilitation of Wells
Water Main Improvements
Radio System Upgrade
$ 85,000 Development driven
58,000 Summer
275,000 Waiting for Fed Funds; Build in 2013
418,000
75,000 Summer
25,000 Summer
100,000
45,000
Purchased
55,000
Purchased chassis
13,000
Researching
20,000
Purchased
133,000
Quotes
40,000 In progress
45,000
In progress
25,000
In progress
9,000
Purchased
5,600
Purchased
65,000
Quotes
35,000
To be installed in April
184,600
Does not meet warrants
$ 15,000
35,000 Out for bids
25,000 Summer
5,000 In progress
80,000
140,000 Development driven
21,400 In progress
161,400
30,000
355,000
On hold
110,000
Summer
753,000
Out for bids
25,000
Bids accepted
42,000
Out for bids
2,202,000
Plan prep
525,000
Does not meet warrants
140,000
Purchased
4,152,000
60,000 Out forgoutes
1,026,000 Plan prep
28,600 In progress
1,114,600
Grand Total $ 6,413,600
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2012 thru 2016
Project# 13- 45000 -01
Project Name Replacement - One Ton Truck w/ Plow #599
Type Equipment Department Park & Rec - Operations
Useful Life 10 Years Contact DPW / City Engineer
Category Equipment Priority 2 - Medium
Description
eplace Unit # 599, a 2000 F450 1 -ton with 55,819 miles. These trucks are on the move all year and average about 5,000 miles per year. They
are used for hauling material and equipment and plowing cul -de -sacs.
Justification
truck is used everyday; hauling material, equipment, people and also plowing snow in the winter. The snow plowing puts a lot of wear and
on the engine, transmission and other drive line components.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Vehicles 65,000 65,000
Total 65,000 65,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Bond 65,000 65,000
Total 65,000 65,000
.ig that this is a front line unit, we need to know that we can count on it everyday. Cost to operate it have only gone up $.05 per
those costs will continue to rise in the coming years. With preventative maintenance, we might be able to extend its useful life.
year
114
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2012 thru 2016
Project # 13- 45000 -02
Project name Replacement - Trailer #T -554
Type Equipment Department Park & Rec - Operations
Useful Life 10 Years Contact DPW / City Engineer
Category Equipment Priority 2 - Medium
Description
Feplace Unit #T -554., a tandem axle trailer with GV W rating of 10,000 - 12,000 lbs. It was recently sand blasted and repainted top to bottom
- xtending its useful life a few more years.
is the main trailer for the Parks Department. It was the first and only trailer that was designed for hauling mowers and it has worked out
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment 10,000 10,000
Total 10,000 10,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Bond 10,000 10,000
Total 10,000 10,000
Budget Impact/Other I
More parks can only mean moving more equipment to them.
115
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2012 thru 2016
Project# 13- 43100 -01
Project name Replacement- Ditch mowing tractor and mowers
Type Equipment Department Streets /Highways
Useful Life 15 -20 Years Contact DPW / City Engineer
Category Streets/Highways Priority 1 -High
_
Description
Replace Unit #115, a 1993 John Deere model #6400 tractor with side and rear flail mowers. The tractor has 3,397 hours on it and puts about 175
hours a year mowing ditches.
tractor will be 19 years old in 2013 and maintenance costs have been steadily going up. The maintenance cost per hour is now
d on the mowers is getting thimmer and we have had to patch holes in 2009 and 2010.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment 90,000 90,000
Total 90,000 90,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Bond 90,000 90,000
Total 90,000 90,000
Budget Impact/Other
Lower maintenance cost and a more productive machine.
126
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project# 13- 43100 -02
Project Name Replacement - One Ton Truck w/ Plow #132
2012 thru 2016
Type. Equipment Department Streets / Highways
Useful Life 10 Years Contact DPW / City Engineer
Category Equipment Priority 1 -High
ce Unit #132, a 2001 Ford F -450 dump truck with a 9 foot Fisher snow plow with 85,735 miles on it. This unit plows cul -de -sacs and
equipment and materials through out the year.
2013, this truck will be 12 years old and have approximately 95,000 miles on it. It will be re- evaluated each year to determine when to
lace it. Cost to operate this unit are holding steady at $.46 per mile.
Expenditures 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Equipment 65,000 Total
65,000
Total 65,000 65,000
Funding Sources 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Equipment Bond 65,000
65,000
Total 65,000 65,000
B udget Impact/oth
.ess cost per mile to operate.
127
DOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2013 -2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Discussion
DATE: March 27, 2012
INTRODUCTION
In late March, Administration/Finance will distributed baseline worksheets to Department Heads
as the 2013 -2017 CIP kick -off. Subsequent discussion will center on the 2013 -2017 CIP
development calendar and the need of other committees (Vehicle Purchasing & Facility
Management Committees) and commissions (Parks and Recreation & Community Center
Advisory) to start their work.
DISCUSSION
To assist with the 2013 -2017 CIP discussion, I have attached for the Council's reference the
adopted City of Andover Capital Improvement Policy and last year's 2012- 2016 CIP project
listings. A 2012- 2016 Adopted CIP progress report will be done as a separate agenda item.
Throughout the year it is anticipated that a significant amount of time will be spend on evaluating
water /sewer. infrastructure, transportation improvements, building maintenance, equipment and
park and recreation needs. Each of these items will be supported by a detailed fund balance
analysis of funding sources (based on various assumptions and estimates) that will be presented
to the Council for review at future workshops.
At this time the Staff would like the secure the Council's priorities to assure that those
priorities are taken into consideration while staff prepares the draft 2013 -2017 for a future
Council workshop meeting.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to review the various attachments, receive a brief presentation, and
NQite direction to staff on Council priorities for the 2013 -2017 CIP.
submitted,
Jim
CITY OF ANDOVER FINANCIAL POLICIES
C. Capital Improvement Policy
1. A Capital Improvements Program (CIP) will be developed for a period of five years. As resources are
available, the most current year of the CIP will be incorporated into the current year operating budget
as the Capital Improvements Budget (CIB). The CIP will be reviewed and updated annually. Years
two through five are for planning purposes only.
2. The City will maintain its physical assets in a manner, adequate to protect the City's capital investment
and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. The City will provide for maintenance
and replacement from current revenues where possible.
3. To be considered in the Capital Improvements Program a project must have an estimated cost of at
least $5,000 in one of the calendar years of the project. Projects may not be combined to meet the
minim standard unless they are dependent upon each other. Items that are operating expense (such
as maintenance agreements, personal computer software upgrades, etc.) will not be considered within
the CIP.
5. Capital projects, which duplicate other public and/or private service, will not be considered.
6. The City will identify the estimated costs and potential funding sources for each capital project prior
to inclusion in the CIP. The operating costs to maintain capital projects shall be considered prior to
the decision to undertake the capital projects.
7. Capital projects and/or capital asset purchases will receive a higher priority if they meet a majority of
the following criteria:
A. Mandatory project
B. Maintenance project (approved replacement schedules)
C. Improve efficiency
D. Provide a new service
E. Policy area project
F. Broad extent of usage
G. Length of expected useful life
H. Positive effect on operation and maintenance costs
I. Availability of county /state /federal grants
J. Elimination of hazards (improves public safety)
K. Prior commitments
L. Replacement due to disaster or loss
9. The CIP is to be presented by the Finance Director annually to the City Council for approval. Any
substantive change to the CIP after approval must be approved by the City Council.
City of Andover, MN
Capital Plan
2012 thra 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department
Project#
Priority
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Central Equip
Replacement - Hotly Pressure Washer
14- 48800 -01
3
7,000
7,000
Equipment Bond
7,000
7,000
Replacement - Service Truck
1448800 -02
2
40,000
40,000
Equipment Bond -
40,000
40,000
Replacement - Floor Sweeper
15- 48800.01
3
35,000
35,000
Equipment Bond
35,000
34000
Central Equipment Total
47,000
35,000
82,000
Community Center
Replacement- Carpet/Flooring
13- 44000 -01
1
10,000
10,000
Comm Ctr Operations
10,006
10,000
Replacement - toe Edger
13- 44300 -02
1
8,000
8,000
Comm Ctr Operations
8,000
8,000
Replacement - Rink Boards
15- 44300 -01
2
12,000
12,000
Comm Ctr Operations
_
12,000
14000
Community Center Total
18,000
12,000
30,000
Elections
Replacement - Voting Equipment
13- 41310 -01
1
110,000
110,000
State Grant
110,000
110,000
Elections Total
110,000
110,000
En ineerin
New Development Projects
12- 41600 -01
1
85,000
110,000
115,000
140,000
150,000
600,000
Sewer Trunk Fund
67,000
22,000
90,000
110,000
110,000
399,000
Water Trunk Fund
18,000
88,000
25,000
30,000
40,000
201,000
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
12- 41600 -02
1
58,000
56,000
68,000
76,000
68,000
326,000
Road B Bridge Funds
58,000
56,000
68,000
76,000
68,000
326,000
Bunker Lake Boulevard Trail
12- 41600 -03
1
275,000
275,000
Municipal State Aid Funds
55,000
55,000
State Grant
220,000
220,000
Engineering Total
418,000
166,000
183,000
216,000
218,000
1,201,000
Facility Management
Surface Seal all Brick Structures
12- 41900 -01
1
75,000
75,000
Capital Projects Levy
2 ;500
21,500
Comm Ctr Operations
32,000
32,000
Water Fund
20,500
20,500
3
Department
Project#
Priority
2012 2013
2014 2015
2016
Total
Annual Parking Lot Maintenance
12- 41900 -02
1
25,000 26,000
27,000 28,000
130,000
236,000
Capital Projects Levy
12- 42200 -01
2
25,000 26,000
27,000 28,000
30,000
136,000
Comm Cir Operations
45,000
100,000
100,000
Land Purchase
13- 41900 -01
1
1,500,000
1,500,000
Building Fund
1,500,000
1,500,000
Carpet/ Tile Replacement
13- 41900 -03
2
10,000
10,000
20,000
Capital Projects Levy
10,000
10,000
20,000
Roof Replacements
13- 41900 -04
1
300,000
300,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
300,000
300,000
Building A - Seal Floor
15- 41900 -01
1
600,000
20,000
20,000
Capital Projects Levy
600,000
20,000
20,000
Addition to Storage Building & Vehicle Maint. Shop
15- 41900 -02
1
3,000,000
3,000,000
G.O. Bond -
3,000,000
3,000,000
Recycling Building & Fence
15 -41900 -03
1
300,000
300,000
G.O. Bond
300,000
300,000
Attached Storage Building
15- 41900 -04
1
300,000
300,000
G.O. Bond
300,000
300,000
Relocate Fuel Station wl Canopy
15- 41900 -05
2
300,000
300,000
G.O. Bond
300,000
300,000
Fire St. #2 Addition with additional land purchase
15 -41900 -06
2
885,000
32,000
885,000
G.O. Bond
885,000
32,000
885,000
Pedestrian Tunnel Under Crosstown Blvd.
15- 41900 -07
1
450,000
32,000
450,000
G.O. Bond
450,000
32,000
450,000
Facility Management Total
100,000 1,836,000
27,000
5,293,000 130,000
7,386,000
Fire r
Replacement - Fire Chiefs Vehicle
12- 42200 -01
2
45,000
45,000
Equipment Bond
45,000
45,000
Replacement - Rescue #11
12- 42200 -02
2
55,000
55,000
Equipment Bond
55,000
55,000
Replacement - Hydraulic Rescue Cutters
12- 42200 -03
1
13,000
13,000
Equipment Bond
13,000
13,000
New - Thermal Imaging Camera
12- 42200 -04
1
20,000
20,000
Equipment Bond
20,000
20,000
Replacement - Ladder Truck #11
13- 42200 -01
1
600,000
600,000
1,200,000
Equipment Bond
600,000
600,000
1,200,000
Replacement - Grass #31
14- 42200 -01
2
45,000
45,000
Equipment Bond
45,000
45,000
Replacement - Grass #21
14- 42200 -02
2
45,000
45,000
Equipment Bond
45,000
45,000
Replacement - Tanker #11
14- 42200 -03
2
340,000
340,000
Equipment Bond
340,000
340,000
Replacement - Fire Marshall Vehicle
14- 42200 -04
2
40,000
40,000
Equipment Bond
40,000
40,000
Replacement - Utility #4
15- 42200 -01
2
32,000
32,000
Equipment Bond
32,000
32,000
Replacement - Utility #5
15 -42200 -02
2
32,000
32,000
Equipment Bond
32,000
32,000
New - Waterllce rescue boat
15- 42200 -03
1
20,000
20,000
Equipment Bond
20,000
20,000
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Fire Total 133,000 600,000 1,070,000 84,000 1,887,000
Information Technology
Springbrook Version 7
12- 41420 -01
1
40,000
40,000
Capital Projects Levy
40,000
40,000
Information Technology Total
40,000
40,000
Park & Rec - Opera
`
Replace/Repair Play Structures - Various Parks
12- 45000 -01
1
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
225,000
Capital Projects Levy
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
225,000
ReplacelRepair Major Park Projects - Various Parks
12- 45000 -02
1
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
125,000
Capital Projects Levy
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
125,000
New - Cab and Snow Blower Attachment
12- 45000 -03
1
9,000
9,000
Equipment Bond
4,500
4,500
Sanitary Sewer Fund
4,500
4500
New - Trail Plow Attachment
12- 45000 -04
1
5,600
5,600
Equipment Bond
5,600-
5,600
Replacement -10 Ft Wide Trail Mower #583
12- 45000 -05
1
65,000
65,000
Equipment Bond
65,000
65,000
Sunshine Park - Parking Lot Security Lighting
12 -05000 -06
1
35,000
35,000
Capital Projects Levy
35 000
35,000
Replacement - One Ton Truck w / Plow #599
13- 45000 -01
2
65,000
65,000
Equipment Bond
65,000
65,000
Replacement - Trailer #T -554
13- 45000 -02
2
10,000
10,000
Equipment Bond
10,000
-
10,000
Replacement - One Ton Truck wl Plow #503
14- 45000 -01
2
65,000
65,000
Equipment Bond
65,000
65,000
Replacement - Bobcat #610
14 -45000 -02
2
36,000
36,000
Equipment Bond
36,000
36,000
Replacement - Toro Groundsmaster #559
15 -05000 -01
1
23,000
23,000
Equipment Bond
23,000
23,000
Replacement- One Ton Crew Cab Pickup #502
16- 45000 -01
1
50,000
50,000
Equipment Bond
50,000
50,000
Park & Rec - Operations Total
184,600
145,000
171,000
93,00
120,000
713,600
Park & Rec - Projects
Annual Miscellaneous Park Projects
12- 45001 -01
1
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
75,000
Park Dedication Funds
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
75,000
Sunshine Park - West Parking Lot
12- 45001 -02
1
35,000
35,000
Park Dedication Funds
35,000
35,000
Hickory Meadows
12- 45001 -03
1
25,000
25,000
Park Dedication Funds
25,000
25,000
Irrigation Project - Small
12- 45001 -04
1
5,000
5,000
Park Dedication Funds
5,000
5,000
Park Redesign I Major Irrigation Improvements
15 -05001 -01
2
200,000
200,000
Park Dedication Funds
200,000
200,000
Park & Rec - Projects Total 80,000 15,000 15,000 215,000 15,000 340,000
Sanita S ewer
0
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Sanitary Sewer Extensions
12 48200 -01
1
140,000
500,000
105,000
745,000
Assessments
140,000
-
105,000
245,000
Sewer Trunk Fund
500,000
500,000
Radio System Upgrade
12- 48200 -02
1
21,400
21,400
Sanitary Sewer Fund
21,400
21,400
Replacement - 3/4 Ton Truck w/ Plow #90
13- 48200 -01
1
65,000
65,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund
65,000
65,000
Replacement - One Ton Truck w/ Plow #94
13- 48200 -02
2
65,000
65,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund
32,500
32500
Stone Sewer Fund
32,500
32,500
Replacement - Jet/Vac Truck #99
14- 48200 -02
1
357,000
357,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund
178,500
178,500
Sewer Trunk Fund
178,500
178,500
Yellow Pine Lift Station
1548200 -01
1
650,000
650,000
Sewer Trunk Fund
650,000
650,000
Rural Reserve Trunk Sanitary Sewer
15- 48200 -02
1
2,250,000
1,250,000
3,500,000
Assessments
.250,000
1,000,000
1,250,000
Sewer Revenue Bonds
$000,000
250,000
2,250,000
Sanitary Sewer Total
161,400
130,000
357,000
3,400,000
1,355,000
5,403,400
Storm Sewer
Stomi Sewer Improvements
12 48300 -01
1
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
200,000
Storm Sewer Fund
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
200,000
Replacement- Elgin Street Sweeper #169
14 -08300 -01
1
150,000
150,000
Equipment Bond
150,000
150
Storm Sewer Total
30,000
35,000
190,000
45,000
50,000
350,000
Streets / Highways
Annual Street Seal Coat Project
12- 43100 -01
1
355,000
442,000
387,000
765,000
740,000
2,689,000
Construction Seal Coat Fund
4,000
10,000
20,000
34,000
Road &Bridge Funds
351,000
441,000
387,000
755,000
720,000
2,655,000
Annual Street Crack Seal Project
12 -43100 -02
1
110,000
103,000
191,000
167,000
205,000
776,000
Construction Seat Coat Fund
1,000
1,000
3,000
5,000
Road &Bridge Funds
110,000
103,000
190,000
166,000
202,000
771,000
Annual Street Reconstruction
12- 43100 -03
1
753,000
700,000
804,000
856,000
850,000
3,963,000
Assessments
188,000
175,000
201,000
214,000
215,000
993,000
Road &Bridge Funds
565,000
525,000
603,000
642,000
635,000
2,970,000
Annual Pavement Markings
12- 43100 -04
1
25,000
26,000
27,000
29,000
31,000
138,000
Road &Bridge Funds
25,000
26,000
27,000
29,000
31,000
138,000
Annual Curb Replacement
12- 43100 -05
1
42,000
43,000
44,000
45,000
46,000
220,000
Road &Bridge Funds
42,000
43,000
44,000
45,000
46,000
220,000
Municipal State Aid Routes / New & Reconstruct
1243100 -06
1
2,202,000
1,626,000
433,000
4,261,000
Assessments
220,000
65,000
285,000
Municipal State Aid Funds
1,982,000
1,561,000
433,000
3,976,000
Intersection Upgrades
12- 43100 -07
1
525,000
65,000
590,000
Municipal State Aid Funds
525,000
65,000
590,000
New - Front -End Loader
12- 43100 -08
1
140,000
140,000
Equipment Bond
140,000
140,000
Replacement- Ditch mowing tractor and mowers
13- 43100 -01
1
90,000
90,000
Equipment Bond
90,000
-
90,000
Replacement - One Ton Truck w/ Plow #132
13- 43100 -02
1
65,000
65,000
Equipment Bond
65,000
65,000
Departme Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Replacement - Dump Truck w/ Snow Removal #198
14- 43100 -01
1
150,000
150,000
Equipment Bond
150,000
150,000
Replacement - Water Tanker #163
14- 43100 -02
2
100,000
100,000
Equipment Bond
100,000
100,000
Streets / Highways Total
4,152,000
3,095,000
2,201,000
1,862,000 1,872,000
13,182,000
Water
Rehabilitation of Wells
12 418100 -01
1 60,000
65,000
70,000
70,000
265,000
Water Fund
60,000
65,000
70,000
70,000
265,000
Water Main Improvements
12- 48100 -02
1 1,026,000
710,000
1,736,000
Assessments
240,000
710,000
950,000
Water Trunk Fund
786,000
786,000
Radio System Upgrade
12- 48100 -03
1 28,600
28,600
Water Fund
28,600
28,600
WTP Generator Upgrade
13- 48100 -01
1
50,000
50,000
Water Fund
50,000
50,000
Water Meter Reading System AMI /AMR
15- 48100 -01
2
900,000
900,000
Water Fund
-
900,000
900,000
Water Total
1,114,600
115,000
70,000
1,680,000
2,979,600
GRAND TOTAL
6,413,600
6,265,000
4,331,000
12,935,000 3,760,000
33,704,600
ANLD6 O F
OVE
16 85 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2012 Budget Implementation General Fund Progress Report — February 2012
DATE: March 27, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The City of Andover 2012 General Fund Budget contains total revenues of $9,263,720 and total
expenditures of $9,263,720. Monthly reporting of the City Budget progress to the Governing
body is a recommended financial practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the General Fund Expenditure Budget Summary - Budget Year 2012 through
February 2012 The attachment is provided to assist discussion in reviewing 2012 progress;
other documents may be distributed at the meeting.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation and provide direction to staff.
CITY OF ANDOVER
General Fund Budget Summary Totals
Budget Year 2012
2011
1
1
2012
1
REVENUES
Budget
Feb YTD
% of Bud
Final
Budget
Feb YTD
% of Bud
General Property Tax
$ 7,217,219
$ -
0%
$ 7,115,936
$ 7,398,782
$ -
0%
Licenses and Permits
250,080
37,378
15%
387,206
250,155
28,359
11%
Intergovernmental
558,215
174,055
31%
566,707
566,103
191,276
34%
Charges for Services
580,200
75,867
13%
866,584
601,150
99,690
17%
Fines
105,750
6,513
6%
99,777
100,750
8,019
8 %
Investment Income
65,000
(13,225)
-20%
130,368
65,000
(21,475)
-33%
Miscellaneous
84,900
51,903
61%
127,602
84,850
51,677
61%
Transfers In
196,930
196,930
100%
196,930
196,930
196,930
100%
Total Revenues
$ 9,058,294
$ 529,421
6%
$ 9,491,110
$ 9,263,720
$ 554,476
6%
2012
2011
EXPENDITURES
Budget
Feb YTD
%.of Bud
Final
Budget
Feb YTD
% of Bud
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
=�Y�
Mayor and Council
$ 106,956
$ 34,635
32%
$ 101,372
$ 88,162
$ 35,524
40%
y 1
Administration
138,157
20,876
15%
135,523
140,621
18,575
13%
Newsletter
27,500
3,300
12%
22,897
25,500
3,412
13%
Human Resources
36,221
4,129
11%
31,854
15,429
4,672
30%
Attorney
178,300
14,355
8%
171,062
178,300
14,250
8%
City Clerk
103,333
15,576
15%
100,693
103,937
15,356
15%
Elections
6,750
753
11%
6,398
53,922
757
1%
Finance
212,967
38,581
18%
207,033
213,522
39,921
19%
Assessing
152,500
-
0%
143,693
152,500
-
0 %
Information Services
154,871
16,742
11%
142,963
153,560
12,823
8%
Planning & Zoning
355,258
38,733
11%
324,302
338,696
35,651
11%
Engineering
414,408
55,345
13%
413,819
419,688
54,079
13%
Facility Management
528,739
58,784
11%
469,476
574,639
52,911
9%
Total General Gov
2,415,960
301,809
12%
2,271,085 -
2,458,476
287,931
12 %.
PUBLICSAFETY
Police Protection
2,615,407
-
0%
2,615,407
2,694,135
-
0%
Fire Protection
1,077,084
114,540
11%
974,988
1,081,933
115,773
11%
Protective Inspection
363,789
45,984
13%
360,277
363,834
46,736
13%
Civil Defense
16,463
3,818
23%
16,301
16,755
4,083
24%
Animal Control
9,970
560
6%
11,087
9,950
73
1%
Total Public Safety
4,082,713
164,902
4%
3,978,060
4,166,607
166,665
4 %.
PUBLIC WORKS
Streets and Highways
578,050
64,224
11%
594,293
571,625
74,370
13
Snow and Ice Removal
489,315
167,252
34
434,602
488,172,
100,029
20%
t f-
Street Signs
196,712
15,624
8%
175,833
196,631
17,229
9%
Traffic Signals
36,000
1,392
4%
26,569
36,000
1,448
4%
Street Lighting
36,400
2,661
7%
32,317
36,400
2,817
8%
Street Lights - Billed
206,000 -
14,492
7%
189,144
206,000
15,068
7%
Park & Recreation
916,832
92,810
10%
889,178
932,599
96,103
10%
Recycling
122,273
12,736
10%
109,911
126,210
8,572
7 %°
Total Public works
2,581,582
371,191
_ 14%
2,451,847
.2,593,637
315,636
12 %.
OTHER
45,000
7,500
17%
30,631
80,000
- 28,500
36%
Total Other
45,000
_ 7,500
17%
30,631
80,000
28,500
-. 36%
Total Expenditures
$ 9,125,255
$ 845,402
9%
S 8,731,623
$ 9,298,720
$ 798,732
_ 9 %
NET INCREASE (DECREASE)
$ (66,961)
$ (315,981)
$ 759,487
- $ (35,000)
$ - (244,256)
•
C I T Y O F
ND OVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: February 2012 Investment Report
DATE: March 27, 2012
INTRODUCTION
Summary reporting of the City Investment portfolio to the Governing body is a recommended
financial practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the Investment Maturities Summary for February 2012. The attachment is
intended to assist with discussion in reviewing the February 2012 investm other
documents may be distributed at the meeting
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation and provide direction to staff.
i
3
i
N
O
N
L
R
i
A
v
W
L
R
C
i
y
d
7
C
C
N
7
M M
LZ
a z z A a a z z
T
F q
o y
b r
m
to
o v o v� Z• C6 F o
O
3
'
' "t
N b '
W
'
'�!1
^
r
r
D
M
�
69
p
r �
m
O
v
V3
69
O
N
o
C, CN N
N3
69
^
N
c�h
N
CO
V�1 O
M
W
L
^
o
V
l�
O
Ow
O
N
.-1
69
O N
M
M
M
V1
C\
O
7
V
'A
00
O 00
�o
(D
It
01
R
O\
00
Vl
V
O
o0
M
an
O
.-�
7 N v)
N 7
0o
[L 7
.-.
7
06 N
N
N
N
�
69
69
M M
LZ
a z z A a a z z
T
F q
o y
b r
m
to
o v o v� Z• C6 F o
L wori I
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Discuss 2013 Budget Development Guidelines
DATE: March 27, 2012
INTRODUCTION
City Administration is starting to focus on the 2013 Annual Operating Budget Development
process and is looking to the City Council to establish the Council's guidelines for the
preparation of the 2013 Annual Operating Budget.
City Administration would like to submit guidelines to the Council for formal approval at the
April 3, 2012 Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
The following are some suggested 2013 Budget Development guidelines for your consideration
and could be impacted by the Councils discussion
1) A commitment to a City Tax Capacity Rate to meet the needs of the organization and
positioning the City for long -term competitiveness through the use of sustainable revenue
sources and operational efficiencies.
Note: Preliminary Anoka County Assessor taxable market value figures (attached) for the
City of Andover are reflecting a 4.3% decrease in total taxable market value. Tax Increment
Financing District 1 -1 will be decertifying at the end of 201, complete impacts are still being
evaluated, and it is likely the State of Minnesota will place levy limits on cities for 2013
levies.
2) Continue with the current procurement and financial plan to appropriately expend the bond
proceeds generated from the successful 2006 Open Space Referendum.
Note: Staff has been active pursuing the third open space purchase. It is anticipated closed
sessions with the City Council will be held in the near future to discuss progress.
3) A fiscal goal that works toward establishing the General Fund balance for working capital at
no less than 45% of planned 2013 General Fund expenditures and the preservation of
emergency fund balances (snow emergency, public safety, facility management &
information technology) through targeting revenue enhancements or expenditure limitations
in the 2012 adopted General Fund budget.
Note: With property tax revenues making up 80% of the total General Fund revenues cash
flow designations approaching 50% are appropriate.
4) A commitment to limit the 2012 debt levy to no more than 20% of the gross tax levy and a
commitment to a detailed city debt analysis to take advantage of alternative financing
consistent with the City's adopted Debt Policy.
Note: The adopted 2012 debt levy was 17.94% of the gross tax levy, 20% will provide
margin to accommodate the 2012 Equipment Bond debt service.
5) A comprehensive review of the condition of capital equipment to ensure that the most cost -
effective replacement schedule is followed. Equipment will be replaced on the basis of a cost
benefit analysis rather than a year based replacement schedule.
6) A team approach that encourages strategic planning to meet immediate and long -term
operational, staffing, infrastructure and facility needs.
7) A management philosophy that actively supports the funding and implementation of Council
policies and goals, and a commitment to being responsive to changing community conditions,
concerns, and demands, and to do so in a cost effective manner.
ACTION REQUIRED
The Council is requested to review the aforementioned proposed Budget Development
guidelines, discuss whether or not they are appropriate for developing the 2013 Annual Operating
Budget.
submitted,
Attachments
ANOKA COUNTY
} `
2012 Pay 2013
Market Value
PAYABLE 2012/PAYABLE 2013 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE
COMPARISON as of 03106/2012
2012 Pay 2013 %CHG from
2012 Pay 2013 MV w/o New 2011 Pay 2012 2012 to 2013
New Construction Construction Market Value w/o NC
LINWOOD
AG
14,884,352
83,400
14,800,952
15,756,686
-6.1%
RESID
329,029,440
3,291,600
325,737,840
356,606,563
-8.7
APTS
1,997,200
_ 0
1,997,200
2,034,200
-1.8%
C AND 1
2,399,500
0
2,399,500
4,672,700
- 48.6%
PERSONAL
2,772,300
0
2,772,300
2,772,300
0.0%
TOTALS
351,082,792
3,375,000
347,707,792
381,842,449
-8.9%
Average Residential Value
134,100
142,900
-6.2%
Median Residential Value
132,800
143,700
-7.6%
ANDOVER
AG
22,645,566
59,300
22,586,266
23,764,878
-5.0%
RESID
1,956,906,247
20,516,900
1,936,389,347
2,019,014,978
-4.1%
APTS
14,626,000
0
14,626,000
14,824,100
-1.3%
CANDI
111,194,000
2,208,500
108,985,500
119,232,200
-8.6%
PERSONAL
25,297,100
0
25,297,100
25,299,200
0.0%
TOTALS
2,130,668,913
22,784,700
2,107,884,213
2,202,135,356
-4.3%
Average Residential Value
185,200
186,500
-0.7%
Median Residential Value
174,700
179,300
-2.6%
ANOKA
AG
28,000
0
28,000
23,400
19.7%
RESID
554,611,386
1,472,100
553,139,286
- 633,862,845
- 12.7%
APTS
150,409,900
923,100
149,486,800
149,796,800
-0.2%
CANDI
247,730,600
1,471,600
246,259,000
270,741,300
-9.0%
PERSONAL
4,394,400
0 -
4,394,400
4,368,000
0.6 1 /6
TOTALS
957,174,286
3,866,800
953,307,486
1,058,792,345
- 10.0%
Average Residential Value
117,200
130,300
-10.1%
Median Residential Value
110,100
127,700
-13.7%
BETHEL
AG
461,168
0
_ 461,168
479,009
-3.7%
RESID
16,207,408
77,500
16,129,908
18,341,398
-12.1%
APTS
56,300
0
56,300
67,300
- 16.3%
CANDI
3,517,900
0
3,517,900
4,021,200
-12.5%
PERSONAL
1,594,300
0
1,594,300
1,594,300
0.0%
TOTALS
21,837,076
77,500
21,759,576
24,503,207
-11.2%
Average Residential Value
82,700
90,800
-89%
Median Residential Value
88,600
99,900
- 11.3%
Tuesday, March 06, 2012 Taxable Market Value Comparison [STARIOG] 3. 1
TOTALS .
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
CENTERVILLE
AG
RESID
APTS
CANDI
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
CIRCLE PINES
AG
RESID
APTS
C AND I
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
AG
RESID
APTS
C AND I
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
4,254,167 545
152,900
127,000
PAYABLE 2012/PAYABLE 2013 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE
COMPARISON as of 0310612012
2012 Pay 2013 % CHG from
2012 Pay 2013 MV w/o New 2011 Pay 2012 2012 to 2013
New Construction Construction Market Value w/o NC
0
ANOKA COUNTY
20,128,718
- 30.7%
74,560,800
2012 Pay 2013
3,442,496,818
Market Value
BLAINE
155,213,100
AG
13,947,027
RESID
3,123,916,618
APTS
156,029,400
C AND I
891,824,500
PERSONAL
68,450,000
TOTALS .
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
CENTERVILLE
AG
RESID
APTS
CANDI
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
CIRCLE PINES
AG
RESID
APTS
C AND I
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
AG
RESID
APTS
C AND I
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
4,254,167 545
152,900
127,000
PAYABLE 2012/PAYABLE 2013 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE
COMPARISON as of 0310612012
2012 Pay 2013 % CHG from
2012 Pay 2013 MV w/o New 2011 Pay 2012 2012 to 2013
New Construction Construction Market Value w/o NC
0
13,947,027
20,128,718
- 30.7%
74,560,800
3,049,355,818
3,442,496,818
-11.4%
816,300
155,213,100
157,275,000
-1.3%
4,227,000
887,597,500
976,684,700
-9J%
197,800
68,252
70,961,300
-18%
79,801,900
4,174,365,645
4,667,546,536
- 10.6 %°
0.0%
266,282,066
162,700
-6.0%
286,348,535
-7.6%
145,400
-12.7%
791,014
0
791,014
713,748
10.8%
240,941,252
1,486,600
239,454,652
258,576,887
-7.4%
625,700
0
625,700
631,900
-1.0%
21,704,300
90,900
21,613,400
24,206,200
- 10.7%
2,219,800
0
2,219,800
2,219,800
0.0%
266,282,066
1,577,500
264,704,566
286,348,535
-7.6%
169,100
177,100
-4.5%
146,300
156,300
-6.4%
0
0
0
0
N/A
240,309,313
243,500
240,065,813
280,936,003
-14.5%
14,732,400
389,900
14,342,500
14,664,400
-2.2%
13,617,100
258,500
13,358,600
15,255,500
- 12.4%
1,707,100
0
1,707,100
1,707,100
.. _ 0.0%
270,365,913
891,900
269,474,013
312,563,003
- 13.8 %°
124,700
142,900
-12.7%
110,700
128,800
- 14.1%
0
0
0
0
N/A
676,733,197
954,400
675,778,797
808,064,876
- 16.4%
75,203,400
85,100
75,118,300
77,018,000
-2.5%
99,019,200
779,600
98,239,600
107,901,000
-9.0%
5,671,600
0
5,671,600
5,683,500
-0.2%
856,627,397
1,819,100
854,808,297
998,667,376
- 14.4%
97,300
113,200
-14.0%
96,200
118,800
-19.1%
Tuesday,. March 06, 2012 Taxable Market Value Comparison [STARIOGI 3-2
ANOKA COUNTY
2012 Pay 2013
Market Value
PAYABLE 2012/PAYABLE 2013 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE
COMPARISON as of 03/06/2012
2012 Pay 2013 % CHG from
2012 Pay 2013 MV w/o New 2011 Pay 2012 2012 to 2013
New Construction Construction Market Value w/o NC
COLUMBUS
AG
25,842,952
40,000
- 25,802,952
26,726,468
-3.5%
RESID
314,840,113
1,457,000
313,383,113
341,545,816
-8.2%
APTS
0
0
0
_ 0
N/A
C AND I
60,409,800
325,200
60,084,600
64,709,500
-7,1%
PERSONAL
6,533,100
0_
6.533,100
.- _ ...............5,797,900
12.7%
TOTALS
407,625,965
1,822,200
405,803,765
438,779,684
-7,5%
Average Residential Value
190,000
202,600
-6.2%
Median Residential Value
179,900
195,200
-Z9%
COON RAPIDS
AG
921,660
0
921,660
968,943
-4.9%
RESm
2,455,919,360
8,823,200
2,447,096,160
2,797,308,182
-115%
APTS
265,391,S00
941,100
264,450,400
269,317,100
-1.8%
C AND I
776,928,400
10,055,200
766,873,200
828,771,800
-7.5%
PERSONAL
43,521,900
445,400
43,076,500
43,072,500
0.0%
TOTALS
3,542,682,820
20,264,900
3,522,417,920
3,939,438,525
- 10.6%
Average Residential Value
118,000
130,900
-9.9%
Median Residential Value
112,600
129,100
-12.7%
EAST BETHEL
AG
28,845,914
26,500
28,819,414
28,863,717
-0.2%
RESID
650,768,301
3;399,300
647,369,001
704,531,576
-8.1%
APTS
6,912,200
0
6,912,200
7,398,000
-6.6%
C AND 1
42,216,800
281,500
41,935,300
48,010,200
- 12.7%
PERSONAL _:
9,200100
50,000
9,150,100
9,154,500
0.0%
TOTALS
737,943,315
3,757,300
734,186,015
797,957,993
-8.0%
Average Residential Value
140,600
148,900
-5.6%
Median Residential Value
138,600
147,200
-5.9%
FRIDLEY
AG
0
0
0
0
NIA
RESID
989,298,908
457,900
988,841,008
1,145,732,150
-13.7%
APTS
183,137,200
0
183,137,200
185,105,100
-1.1%
C AND 1
699,249,700
4,109,500
695,140,200
766,770,000
-9.3%
PERSONAL
23,313,200
0
23,313,200
23,451,300
-0.6%
TOTALS
1,894,999,008
4,567,400
1,890,431,608
2,121,058,550
-10.9%
Average Residential Value
114,600
130,100
-11.9%
Median Residential Value
113,500
134,800
-15.8%
Tuesday, March 06, 2012 Taxable Market Value Comparison [STARI OG] 3-3
ANOKA COUNTY PAYABLE 2012/PAYABLE 2013 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE
COMPARISON as of 03/06/2012
HAM LAKE
AG
RESm
APTS
CANDI
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
HILLTOP
AG
RESID
APTS
CANDI
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
LEXINGTON
AG
RESID
APTS
C AND I
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
LINO LAKES
AG
RESID
APTS
C AND 1
PERSONAL
TOTALS
Average Residential Value
Median Residential Value
2012 Pay 2013 % CHG from
2012 Pay 2013. 2012 Pay 2013 MV w/o New 2011 Pay 2012 2012 to 2013
Market Value New Construction Construction Market Value w/o NC
31,422,044
0
31,422,044
31,856,882
-1.4 0 /9
1,050,382,071
5,759,100
1,044,622,971
1,172,411,842
- 10.9%
13,374,100
0
13,374,100
13,435,200
-0.5%
119,757,800
159,900
119,597,900
134,513,600
-11.1%
16,714,100
" 9,700
, "
"., , 16,713,700 _
-0.1%
1,231,650,115
5,928,700
1,225,721,415
1,368,931,224
-10.5%
187,400
205,400
-8.8%
182,200
197,400
-7.7%
0
0
0
0
N/A
2
19,500
- 2,083,060
2,479,819
-16.0%
9,835,300
0
9,835,300
9,801,500
0.3%
8,513,500
0
8,513,500
9,379,500
-92%
377,600
0
377 ,600
377,600
0.0%
20,828,960
19,500
20,809,460
22,038,419
-5.6%
61,800
67,000
-7.8% "
60,400
68,700
-12.1%
0
0
0
0
N/A
70,777,194
34,000
70,743,194
75,356,228
-6.1%
10,026,200
0
10,026,200
10,072,700
-0.5%
16,434,500
0
16,434,500
18,534,500
- 11.3%
1,456,100
0
1, 456,100
1,6 93,000_
A X14.0%
98,693,994
34,000
98,659,994
105,656,428
-6.6%
126,600
131,700
-3.9%
125,300
132,500
-5.5%
35,925,025
15,700
35,909,325
36,975,154
-2.9%
1,322319,296
9,184,000
1,313,135,296
1,419,807,900
-7,5%
14,878,600
0
14,878,600
15,323,500
-2.9%
135,267,000
100
135,266,900
152,668,300
-11.4%
15,681,000
0
15,681,000
15,681,000
0.0%
1,524,070,921
9,199,800
1,514,871,121
1,640,455,854
-7.7%
195,600
206,500
-5.3%
181,700
196,600
-7.5%
Tuesday, March 06, 2012 Taxable Market Value Comparison ISTARI OGI . 3-4
ANOKA COUNTY
5 2012 Pay 2013
Market Value
PAYABLE 2012/PAYABLE 2013 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE
COMPARISON as of 03/06/2012
2012 Pay 2013 % CHG from
2012 Pay 2013 MV w/o New 2011 Pay 2012 2012 to 2013
New Construction Construction Market Value w/o NC
NOWTHEN
AG
59,055,091
46,900
59,008,191
58,915,481
0.2%
RESID
311,962,704
2,148,000
309,814,704
336,583,473
-8.0 0 /0
APTS
0
0
0
0
N/A
C AND t.
14,864,900
0
14,864,900
16,635,100
- - 10.6%
PERSONAL
5,177,800
0
_
5,177,800
0.0%
TOTALS
391,060,495
2,194,900
388,865,595
417,311,854
-6.8%
Average Residential Value
192,900
204,400
-5.6%
Median Residential Value
195,000
208,400
-6.4%
OAK GROVE
AG
31,235,646
72,600
31,163,046
31,529,125
-1.2%
RESID
561,420,120
6,932,700
554,487,420
579,003,574
-4.2%
APTS
0
0
0
0
N/A
CANDI
19,143,100
648,000
18,495,100
22,416,800
-17,5%
PERSONAL
8,398,400
0
8,398,40
8,39_8,4
0
TOTALS
620,197,266
7,653,300
612,543,966
641,347,899
-45%
Average Residential Value
174,000
175,800
-1.0%
Median Residential Value
165,400
169,600
-2.5%
RAMSEY
AG
14,703,803
2,700
14,701,103
16,496,124
-10.9%
RESID
1,343,958,721
7,996,700
1,335,962,021
1,448,410,411
-7.8%
APTS
11,441,000
0
11,441,000
11,653,500
-1.8%
C AND I
258,747,700
5,450,700
253,297,000
281,837,900
-10.1%
PERSONAL
17,844,100
0
17,844,100
17,640,900
1.2 ...
TOTALS
1,646,695,324
13,450,100
1,633,245,224
1,776,038,835
-8.0%
Average Residential Value
150,900
158,100
-4.6%
Median Residential Value
143,200
151,200
-5.3%
SPRING LAKE PARK
AG
0
0
0
0
N/A
RESOD
243,490,534
532,100
242,958,434
- 275,622,489
-11.9%
APTS
40,417,400
0
40,417.400
40,998,200
-1.4%
C AND I
84,236,200
139,800
84,096,400
96,408,700
- 12.8%
PERSONAL
2,626,000
0
2,626,000
2,706,000
-3.0%
TOTALS
370,770,134
671,900
370,098,234
415,735,389
- 11.0
Average Residential Value
121,100
134,100
-9.7%
Median Residential. Value
117,600
135,500
- 13.2%
Tuesday, March 06, 2012 Taxable Market Value Comparison [STAR) OG) 3.5
ANOKA COUNTY PAYABLE 2012/PAYABLE 2013 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE
COMPARISON as of 03/06/2012
2012 Pay 2013 % CRG from
2012 Pay 2013 2012 Pay 2013 MV w/o New 2011 Pay 2012 2012 to 2013
Market Value New Construction Construction Market Value w/o NC
ST FRANCIS
24,394,457
AG
24,404,757
RESID
282,794,705
APTS
19,046,400
C AND 1
31,707,200
PERSONAL
6,573,500
TOTALS
364,526,562
Average Residential Value
111,800
Median Residential Value
115,800
COUNTY OF ANOKA
-0.8%
AG
305,114,019
RESID
16,738,689,448
APTS
988,140,200
C AND I
3,658,483,700
PERSONAL
269,523,500
TOTALS
21,959,950,867
Average Residential Value
144,700
Median Residential Value
129,900
10,300
24,394,457
2,080,800
280,713,905
0
19,046,400
101,500
31,605,700
0
6,573,500
2,192,600
362,333,962
357,400
304,756,619
319,662,883
-4.7%
151,427,700
16,587,261,748
18,439,694.763
-10.0%
3,155,500
984,984,700
998,726,000
-1.4%
30,307,500
3,628,176,200
3,999,010,900
-9.3%
702,900
268,820,600
271,043,600
-0.8%
185,951,000
21,773,999,867
24,028,138,146
-9.4%
155,400
-6.9 %°
143,900
-9.8%
26,464,550
-7.8%
323,000,935
-13.1%
19,309,500
-1.4%
35,640,200
-11.3%
6,573,500
0.0%
410,988,685
-11.8%
123,800
-9.7%
132,600
- 12.7%
Comments and Please note: These are VERY preliminary figures and current year Stale Assessed Values are not available, prior year
Limiting Conditions: values have been included for estimate purposes.
Tuesday, March 06, 2012 Taxable Market Value Comparison [STARI OGI 3-6