HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC August 20, 1996
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.w. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
Regular City Council Meeting - August 20,1996
Ito Or - 7:00 P'I
Rnl orum
Acendo Approval
Consent Acendo
Approval OT Minute.
Discussion Item
1. Dick KimblertState Senate Candidate
2. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Presentation
3. Hunter.; HollowlPreliminary Plat Discussion, Continued
4. Ponding for Radamacher &. AssocJHills of Bunker Lake 3rd
5. Sketch Plan/Crown Pointe East 2nd
6. Award Bid/94-30/City Hall Structural Steel
7. Sunday Liquor on Ballot
8. Public Works Building Financing
9. Rights of Way Litigation
EDA Meetinf
10. Purchase of Tax Ladies, Inc.
Reports of Starr. Committees. Commissions
1 I. Water Usage!Sunshine ParK
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
12. Approve Ordinance SummarylWetland Buffer
13. Order Feasibility. Report/96-I9/Sunshine Park Irrigation Wen
14. Order Plans & Specs/94-30IEarthwork & Site Utilities
IS. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-30IEarthwork & Site Utilities
) 16. Order Plans &. Specs/94-30ILanc1scaping
17. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-30ILanc1scaping
18. Order Plans &. Specs/94-30/Concrete &. Masonry
19. Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Concrete & Masonry
20. Order Plans &. Specs/94-30/Structural Steel - Labor
21. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-30/SuuctUral Steel. Labor
22. Order Plans &. Specs/94-30IMiscellaneous Construction
23. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-30IMiscelIaneous Construction
24. Order Plans & Specs/94-301R00fing
25. Approve Plans &. Specs/94.30IRoofing
26. Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Aluminum Windows &: Entrances
27. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-30/Aluminum Windows &: Entrances
28. Order Plans &. Specs/94-30/Skylights
29. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-30/Skylights
30. Order Plans &. Specs/94-30IDrywall Systems
3 I. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-30/Drywall Systems
32. Order Plans &. Specs/94-301F100ring
33. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-301F100ring
34. Order Plans & Specs.'94-30/Ceiling Tile Systems
35. Approve Plans &. Specs!94-30/Ceiling Tile Systems
36. Order Plans &. Specs.'94-30/Painting
37. Approve Plans &. Specs.'94-30IPainting
38. Order Plans &. Specs.'94-30IMechanical
39. Approve Plans &. Specs/94-30IMechanical
40. Order Plans &. Specs/94-30/Electrical
41. Approve Plans &. Specst94-30/Electrical
42. Approve Quote!95-:3 'Removal of Service Road EntranceIWoodland Terrace
43. Release Lener of CreditlPinewood Estates 2nd
44. Approve Mowing Fees
45. Authorize Sale/Lot I. Block I. Hartfiel's Estates
\1I"or .("nuncillnoul
Pa, m~"' or ("hum'
\Illllurnmrnt
\
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 20,1996
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED
t\Q Approval of Minutes FOR AGENDA
ITEM City Clerk
t\Q BY:
Approval of Minutes \ 0 .
V. Volk !,
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
August 6,1996 Regular Meeting ijacobson absent)
August 6,1996 EDA Meeting ijacobson absent)
August 7,1996 Special Meeting (Dehn, Kunza absent)
)
MOTION BY: SECOND BY:
CITY OF ANDOVER
AGENDA
r-.o
SECTION
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DA~gust 20, 1996
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
/
Discussion Items
ITEM
r-.o
City Clerk
BY:
\.
Dick Kimbler/Candidate for
State Senator
V. Volk ~.~'
Mr. Kimbler has requested the opportunity to appear before the council to
introduce himself. He is one of the Republican candidates for the office of State
Senator who will be on the ballot for the Primary Election.
Mr. Kimbler has a five minute presentation and after that he will answer any
questions Council may have.
,
\
'.... J
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
ADMINISTRATION
Richard Fursman
Discussion
ITEM NO.
O.
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Presentation
Background:
, /
Vem Peterson, executive director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, will be
present with other representatives of the association to speak to the benefits of being a member. It
is anticipated that this item will take 10 to 15 minutes. A blue portfolio was distributed earlier for
your review. Please bring that material to the city council meeting as well.
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~t
Engineering
ITEM NO.
:~~nter's Hollow/Preliminary Plat Discussion, Continued
At the August 6, 1996 City Council meeting the developer of the proposed Hunter's Hollow
development, Mr. Horst Graser had discussed with the City Council the need to install a
permanent cul-de-sac at the end of 164th Avenue NW.
The City Council had directed the City Attorney, Mr. Bill Hawkins to review the previous
Council discussion regarding the Hunter's Hollow preliminary plat as it related to the
discussion of the cul-de-sac at this location.
As requested by the City Council, Mr. Hawkins will provide the Council with his opinion after
reviewing the video tape of the Council meeting.
/
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
"
/
DATE: August 6 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ADD-ON
Scott.Eric~son,~l
Englneenng \tJ
ITEM NO.
Hunters Hollow
/
During the preliminary plat discussion pertaining to the proposed Hunters Hollow plat,
the City Council had indicated to the developer that a permanent cul-de-sac should be
constructed at the end of 164th Avenue as a compromise to having a street constructed
between 164th Avenue and 165th Lane. At that time, the developer and the residents
adjacent to the existing temporary cul-de-sac supported the construction of the permanent
cul-de-sac. At this time, the developer has indicated that he has meet with the residents
adjacent to the cul-de-sac location and they are not supportive of the construction of a
permanent cul-de-sac at this location. The following questions have arisen, which need
clarification by the Council:
I. As the meeting minutes do not provide details regarding the discussion of the
construction of the permanent cul-de-sac on 164th Avenue, and the preliminary plat
approval was not made contingent on the cul-de-sac construction, the question has arisen
whether the elimination of the street between I 64th Avenue and I 64th Lane was
predicated on a permanent cul-de-sac being constructed at the end of I 64th Avenue
2. The Council indicated that the developer should participate in the construction of the
permanent cul-de-sac at the end of I 64th Avenue The developer indicated that he
interprets this to mean he will fund only a portion of its construction, while staff has
interpreted this to mean the developer will construct the cul-de-sac at his expense. If the
Council proposed to contribute city funds, the funding source should be identified. This
item needs clarification.
3. The developer has indicated that the residents at the end of I 64th Avenue have now
indicated that they are not willing to contribute the easement for a permanent cul-de-sac
at this location. It is noted that there is room on the developers property to construct a
permanent cul-de-sac.
)
J
(Continued)
As the Council has indicated that a second access does not need to be provided for 164th
Avenue, it is crucial to at least provide a full size cul-de-sac at this location to provide the
necessary turn around for fire and safety vehicles. It was staffs understanding that the
Council required the developer to construct a permanent cul-de-sac on the end of I 64th
Avenue as a compromise to the neighborhood and the developer. The developer has
indicated that he does not feel the costs is his to fund, and since the adjacent residents
will not provide the required easement, the extension of the permanent cul-de-sac to his
property is not warranted.
This item needs clarification by the City Council.
/
I
~
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - July 16, 1996
Page 5
J
(Preliminary Plat/Indian Meadows 4th Addition, Continued)
The Council was reluctant to approve the plat until the specific lots
are identified that will need variances and Staff has a chance to review
them.
MOTION by Dehn
further time to
recommendation.
to table this to the next meeting so Staff has ha~
evaluate the variance information and come back with a
Motion died for lack of a Second.
The developer explained only those three lots will need variances. They
have met with the Building Official, Dave Almgren. Mr. Erickson
suggested the plat be approved this evening with the variances on the
three identified lots; and if they find other variances are needed, the
developer will have to make a separate request for those variances.
, ,
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to Resolution approving the
preliminary plat of Indian Meadows 4th Addition with the following
changes: Item 1, change to read: "A variance to Ordinance 10, Section
9.06 A3 for Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, and Lot 4, Block 4, that do not meet
the minimum 39,000-square-foot requirement subject to a report from the
developer regarding on-site sewage treatment as required and approved by
the Building Department for any or all lots prior to any grading."
) After Item 5, add Item No.6, Subject to approval by the City of a Tree
Protection Plan and on-site marking. (See Resolution R139-96) Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Kunza, to include No Truck signage for the
roads in question, especially to minimum quality roads, on those roads
as deemed necessary. (referencing the already developed Indian Meadows
neighborhoods) Motion carried unanimously.
APPROVE PRELIMINARY PLAT/HUNTER'S HOLLOW
Mr. Erickson reviewed the preliminary plat of Hunter's Hollow, which
consists of 22 single family rural residential lots being developed by
Gold Nugget Development Company. Variances to the 39,000-square-foot
minimum requirement are being requested for Lots 2 and 4, Block 1; Lot
1, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3; and Lot 6, Block 4. The variance originally
requested for the tangent section between reserve curves is no longer
needed. There was substantial public opposition to the extension of
Heather Street between 164th Lane and 164th Avenue, though the
construction of the cul-de-sacs on those streets were not intended to be
permanent. They are long deadend cul-de-sacs which greatly exceed the
ordinance requirement for maximum length. Public safety is the reason
the Andover Review Committee and the Fire Department recommended those
streets connect to this plat.
J Councilmember Knight felt that to connect 164th Lane and Avenue with
Heather Street as proposed really puts a burden on two homeowners. He
didn't recall having a cul-de-sac removed before where the City
deliberately turned the existing lot into a corner lot. Normally the
~
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - July 16, 1996
Page 6
I
(Preliminary Plat/Hunter's Hollow, Continued)
extension of a temporary cul-de-sac will go straight through.
other hand, this is the only chance to make a connection to the
On the
east.
Councilmember Jacobson felt the lot and block numbers are confusing, as
there are two Block 3s in the same plat. He asked where the house will
be located on Lot 6, Block 3, in the lower portion of the plat.
Horst Grazer, Gold Nuqqet Development - stated that lot is very large
with the majority in the flood plain. The peat is extremely deep,
making the lot nonbuildable. It may be purchased by the adjoining soe
farmer. The lot originally started as an outlot, but the Council had
preferred it be labeled as a lot.
Councilmember Jacobson preferred it remain labeled as a lot. He too was
concerned with Heather Street. He understood the premise behind building
it, but he felt it doesn't make sense to place that road there. It
provides no purpose. He noted the septic system is shown quite a
distance from the house on Lot 3, Block 4. Do they have the perlnits to
cross the wetlands for 166th Lane? .
John Berq, developer's enqineer - stated that location of the septic
system on Lot 3 is where the suitable soils are found and the system can
'be located to meet all regulations. The location is down hill from
Jwhere the house will be located. The watershed has given approval for
the plat. The wetlands will be crossed with 48-inch culverts. They
have reduced the total flow from the site, keeping it on site, so there
will be no flooding down stream as a result of the plat. In discussing
the split median at the entrance of 166th off Round Lake Boulevard, Mr.
Erickson stated the monument sign will be placed on private property.
The median is for traffic and aesthetics.
Councilmember Jacobson expressed concern with the sod truck traffic tha~
will be going through the developed neighborhood. There was also talk
of converting that area to a commercial driving range. That type of
traffic can create problems for the people moving in, so they should
know up front about the commercial truck traffic and possible
recreational traffic going through their area. Councilmember Knight had
the same reservations, wondering if there is a more logical entrance for
the sod farming operation that would be less bothersome for everybody.
Mr. Berg stated the layout of the plat didn't work out to allow the sod
trucks to use the existing path to Seventh Avenue. He expected that
farm will now use 166th Avenue as its exit. The bituminous on the street
is designed for garbage trucks, and sod trucks weigh much less; so he
saw no problem with the capability of the street handling the truck.'
traffic.
,Mr. Grazer stated there is an easement adjacent to
Jquarter that accesses Round Lake Boulevard, but
constructed. They have told the sod farmer that he
the southern path as an access.
the
it
can
north quarter
has not been
no longer use
~
... c-
'a' _.... ~
~~...
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - July 16, 1996
Page 7
~
.'
(Preliminary Plat/Hunter's Hollow, Continued)
Mike Ekstrom. 3040 164th Lane - noted the petition opposing the Heather
Street connection given ,to the Council from all residents along 164th
Lane except one family. He highlighted the six reasons listed in the
petition for opposing that connection. The plat gives the developer
three cul-de-sacs, which gives him a greater profit, at the expense of
them loosing their cul-de-sac. The people do not want the Heather
Street connection and the developer does not want it. The new road would
be 50 feet from his neighbor, who has two young children. He asked that
the Council not dictate to them what is best for them.
Todd Micklev. 3020 164th Lane NW - stated the whole neighborhood is
opposed to the connection. His property would be on the corner, wit~
the back of his house 33 feet from his property line. A road adjacent
to his property creates an undue hardship on him. There is a shed 10-
feet from the property line which wouldn't meet code if it becomes a
street, plus his neighbor also has a shed. His property wasn't laid out
with the intent of having a side street.
Another person from the development east of this area expressed concern
with the farming operation, as they are all tired of the trucks through
their development. It is not only a safety issue for children, but the
noise. The developer had mentioned that $250,000 to $300,000 houses
were going to be constructed in the development. He wondered how many
would like to listen to the trucks after investing that amount of money
in their homes. It was also noted that last weekend there were
airplanes landing on that property, which created considerable noise.
He also didn't think they needed another lake. The Park Board
recommended c.ash in lieu of land, but he thought this would be an
appropriate area for a playground and/or nature area. There is also
concern with the speed on 164th Lane to Round Lake Boulevard, as it has
the potential of becoming a speedway.
Further Council comments were on the possibility of widening the cul-de-
sac on 164th Lane to the permanent full-sized requirements, th~
possibility of installing "Children at Play" signs along 164th Avenue tc
reduce the speed of traffic, that a speed study could be done along
164th Avenue since there is no possibility of the speed being increased,
that it may be necessary in the future for the sod farming operation to
construct an access out the northern easement if traffic through the
developments becomes a problem, and that.the bituminous on 166th should
be sufficient to handle the additional sod truck traffic. Councilmember
Dehn pointed out that the City's policy is to preserve farm land and
open spaces, but farming operations also create noise, dust and other
nuisances. .'
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, the Resolution approving the
,preliminary plat of Hunter's Hollow as presented with two changes:
;under Item 2, the tangent section between the reverse curves, eliminate
completely, and change to "On the preliminary plat, remove the north-
south section of Heather between 164th Lane and 164th Avenue. (See
Resolution R140-96) Motion carried unanimously.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
"
DATE: August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Ponding for Radamacher & Assoc.lHills
4~ Bunker Lake 3rd Addn.
The City Council has been requested by Mr. Joe Nemo of Radamacher and Assoc. to discuss
with the Council the ponding requirements for the proposed Bills Superette to be constructed
at the intersection of 138th Lane NWand Hanson Boulevard.
The City's Water Resource Management Plan requires all new developments to be managed
based on the 100 year flood level. As the Council is aware, this means that each new
development is required to provide on-site ponding to handle the 100 year flood event. With
the proposed site plan presented by Radamacher and Assoc. the storm water ponding is
indicated along the easterly side of the development. As proposed the pond would eliminate a
number of trees which would provide a buffer between the commercial and residential areas at
this location. Mr. Nemo has indicated that they would like to have a variance to this
requirement of the Water Resource Management Plan in order to maintain the buffer.
I
It was indicated by the developer that originally this site was proposed to drain to the adjacent
storm pond located within the residential area. As some of the Council may recall from
previous discussions, the developer and builders of various lots adjacent to the pond
constructed the homes at a lower elevation than was originally anticipated. As a result a berm
was installed between the commercial and residential developments to limit the amount of
water that could enter the storm water pond. In addition, the City has installed a pumping
system to help reduce the potential for flooding problems in this area.
When the berming and storm water piping improvements were installed easements were not
obtained on the Radamacher property. Thus, their survey indicates the improvements were
constructed on the northeast corner of their property.
The concerns staff has in providing a variance to this section of the Water Resource
Management Plan are as follows:
1. If the on-site ponding is not provided to handle the 100 year flood event the additional
water from this site may impact the existing pond and the residential properties adjacent it.
2. We want to ensure that a precedent is not being set on eliminating the need for the
ponding requirements.
Staff has been discussing various options with the developer that could potentially meet the
storm water ponding requirement and also preserve the tree buffer between the commercial
and residential properties. The options that have been discussed are as follows:
"
1. Reconfigure the site to allow for ponds to be constructed in other areas of the property
other than the area adjacent to the residential development.
2. Look at the possibility of constructing retaining walls for the ponding area as the majority of
the ponding area consists of the side slopes of the pond which could greatly be reduced
through the use of retaining. This would reduce the amount of grading that would need to
be done in the area.
3. Look at reducing as much hard surface as possible to reduce the amount of ponding that is
necessary.
4. Incorporate a combination of the above to preserve the tree buffer between the commercial
and residential sites.
There may be a number of other options that could be further evaluated.
/
, I
~ ~ -.. -~~._---~~-..~-, ,n ~~,. ----~--~ ~"--'---O----'-' -~'~'-----'~-----'--'
._ u.___"u
0
'0
I I \
) \
r~'
~ .
-------
~
'''''N 3NVl
Ili"bWQ1!)
! I fr'" ·
,
_"',;" I
~m~:~ '
.i .":;;;1~
s Ii .~.:.~ '1
~ell ,,;, ~
M Y
:l:
,.
I~~
z
Ul
I! r t
0
z
"
'!II E ,;,,~ ·
0/
V~'!:'
1
::;,~.I
..
.!,' >>
-1,,1-
,
~
,
\
....
\
,
,
,
,
i ,
\
/
(II
I
,....
9 /
~
/
/
/
/
~ /
r.
c /
g~ / 'I'
I~ ~~
i!~ ";3-
PI c:~
I~ 3~
~e
i
ill / r
.I
'"
J/
!
i
/1
~ ;
...
// / , i
1
~J"
/ / i I
,
I I I ,
I I ~
iu
I
, ,/ ,
! I
j
"
f i !
; ,
~/i
! I
i
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
August 20. 1996
/
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion Planning Department
;
ITEM NO. David L. Carlberg <j)
5. Community Development Direc~
Sketch Plan - Crown Pointe East Second
Section 25
Ashford Development Corp, Inc.
The City Council is asked to review and comment on the sketch plan of Crown Pointe East
Second Addition located in Section 25 as being proposed by Ashford Development Corporation,
Inc. The sketch plan consists of 70 single family lots.
Planning and Zoning Commission Review
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the sketch plan on August 13, 1996. Attached
is the staff report from their meeting for background information and Council review. The
Commission did not have any major concerns regarding the sketch plan.
I
Park and Recreation Commission Review
The Park and Recreation Commission has been scheduled to review the sketch plan at
their August 15, 1996 meeting. Staff will inform the Council of the results of that
meeting.
.'
,
I
CITY OF ANDOVER
/
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 13, 1996
DATE
AGENDA ITEM
8. Sketch Plan - Crown Pointe Eas
Section~5
Ashford Development, Inc.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
2nd Planning
David L Carlberg
B fommunity Development Director
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY'~
Request
The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the proposed sketch
plan of Crown Point East Second Addition located in Section 25 as presented by
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. The proposed sketch plan contains 70
single family residential lots.
General Comments
* The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-1, Single Family Rural Zoning
District. The developer will need to make application to rezone subject property to
R-4, Single Family Urban.
, /
* All lots shall be required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section
9.06a(1) which relates to lot size and buildability requirements. The property is
currently located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). In addition,
the front 100 feet of each lot must be buildable which is a standard the City uses
for lots developed with municipal sewer and water.
* The Water Resource Management Plan shall be implemented with the
development.
* The 100 year pond elevation shall be identified on the preliminary plat. In
addition drainage and utility easements are required for the 100 year flood
elevations. Flood fringe and floodway boundaries shall be indicated on
preliminary plat.
"
continued
,
, /
/
, /
Page Two
Sketch Plan - Crown Pointe East Second Addition
Section 25
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
August 13, 1996
* The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon
Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any
other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made
with the City Engineering Department regarding this item.
* There may be wetlands within the proposed development that must be
delineated by agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local
Government Unit is the Coon Creek Watershed District. The developer shall
contact the CCWD to discuss the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act that is in effect.
* The developer is required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other
applicable ordinances.
Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance
Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdividing Ordinance
Ordinance No. 29, Diseased Shade Tree Ordinance & the Tree
Preservation Policy
Ordinance No. 107, Flood Plain Ordinance
Ordinance No. 108, Shore land Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance
* The Planning and Zoning Commission should remember that this item has not
been studied by staff in detail as most of the detail will be reviewed as a part of
the preliminary plat.
Park and Recreation Commission Comments
.'
The Commission will be reviewing the sketch plan at their August 15, 1996
meeting. The Commission will need to review the potential location of parks in
the plat.
/
Page Three
Sketch Plan - Crown Pointe East Second Addition
Section 25
Ashfortl Development Corporation, Inc.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
August 13, 1996
Andover Review Committee Comments
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) met on Thursday, August 1, 1996 to
discuss the sketch plan of Crown Pointe East Second Addition. Comments from
the meeting are as follows:
* Existing structures, wells and septic systems need to be addressed.
* Wetland buffer protection will be required per Ordinance No. 114.
* Sketch plan should show general location of significant trees.
/
* Trails, walkways and sidewalks need to be discussed.
* Anoka County Highway Department reviewed the sketch. (See attached memo)
* Site distances shall be met at all intersections including the Prairie Road
intersection.
* Sanitary sewer and watermain extensions need to be considered and discussed.
* Need to consider how the watermain will be looped.
* Street names should be looked at with the configuration ofthe road system.
* TKDA comments pending.
.'
* Identify ponding areas.
,
. J
/
Page Four
Sketch Plan - Crown Pointe East Second Addition
Section 25
Ashford Development Company
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
August 13, 1996
* The Andover Review Committee discussed the potential for a park area and a
trail system incorporated in the development. The Park and Recreation
Commission will need to discuss this concept and determine the need for a park
in the development.
It should be noted that some of the above listed items will need to be addressed as
a part of the sketch plan review and some of the items will need to be addressed as
a part ofthe preliminary plat application and review. The ARC is listing these
items at this time for discussion purposes.
/
/
08/01/96 12:34 FAX 612 754 3532
ANOKA CO HWY DPT
141001
COUNTY OF ANOKA
Public Services Division
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304
(612) 754-3520 FAX (612) 754-3532
RooM 9ulW
Tr.~ Eng1needng CGon:IllI8tcr
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE - Thursday, August 01,1996
N urn ber 01 pagelll including this cover llheet J
FROM:
TO:
HE:
Roger Butler, Anoka County Highway Departmeut
David L. Carlberg, Community Development Director
City oC Andoyer
SKETCH PLANS FOR:
Crow. Point East Second Addition
and Woodland Estates
/
@ Crown Point East Sketch Phm
Crown Point East is neither adjaceut to nor does it tic directly into any highway on thc
county system. Therefore we have no conunents regarding this development as it relates
to the county highway system. County Ditch No. 57, which borders this site, is under the
jurisdiction of the Coon Creek Watershed District. Proper coordination should be made
with Watershed officials.
Woodland Estlltell Sketch Plan
Existing Right afWay along County Road 18 (Crosstown Blvd.) is 33 ft. west of
centerline. An additionai27 ft.. ofRigbt of Way adjacent to County Road 18 will be
required for future reconsttuctioIl purposes.
The access scheme as shown on the Sketch Plan would give aU Jots witbin this plat access
to local streets. Right of access along County Road 18, with exception for city street
alignments, is to be dedicated to Anoka County.
iu shown. there is inlldcquatc separation between Nightingalc St. and thc north most
proposed city street interllection with County Road 18. Our reoommendation is to
eliminate this intersection and rework the plat to provide an intersection of the notth most
city street and Nightingale St.. The north most city street being the one shown as a Cui de
sac in the northeast comer of the site
.'
/
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
-/
R-I /./ I
,,/'P'
;/
//
PflAlllilC I
r I
r-'"
(
(, \
,l...
\\
'f" --;.... ')
( c.- ~ \ "'" /
(~l ^....,) "
^
>-./ ,~
.{,,-).
" ""
- .-\ '" \
\. ~J(J'.J
"
: 1!6""" AvE HW
a::! It)
..."
:>'1";(
~!W~
00:(. I.~-". I,.T... AvE I0oI..
::;ii;'.
~Wt~!
U;''::J, .53AO AVE '-I'"
LlJt.~-'
X~.",:
~:;:\
::;~:~i: 152I0oI0 AvE N*
cntlli.:..
~I:.::::
~ii~
~i0"'" AvE HW
: I 150TM "'IE ......
,
l~-
~~~~""-
<~ -So.so
G'
~r I
<'
I
I
""9TH AVE HW
"ST.. AVE NW
,.. .
141TH A\lE NW
/.
146TJo'l AvE HW
BARNES ROLLING
OAKS
145 TM AVE HW
'"
144 TM "vE NW
~~-4--
. ~. i
1.3~O AvE. NW
'.2ND AVE NW
I 141ST AVE NW
140T... AVE HW
139TH AvE NW
L38Tfo1 .t.VE NW
137TH AVf. NW
13-6TH AVE NW
. ,
I ' !'
----~____.:___!___J
- ,
I
I
,
I
I
I
I3,T" AV'[ NW
I34T" .wt, NW
I.
I
,
/ Zoning Map
G,3"D WE. ...
'.
9_
J
~
~Z
~O
~
~~
~Q
ZQ
~<C
o
~Q
ZZ
'o'~O
dOU
~~~
lurJ}
~
,
.
~
d
0::
..c::
C,)
.......,
/ Q)
.~
VJ I
.
U
Z
-
j
(
Jl~
! Ill,
II Ii.,
H u~
ft
E-4
Z
~
::s
~
o
....:l
~
:>
~
Cl
Cl
~
o
~
::r::
r:J)
<
~J
IiI.
1'-
I m~
1
&
l!~
l!h
1 m~
.'i
i:'!!'
g
. :
I ;
~.
i.:
- .
~ :~
. .
~ Ii:
::.'0
. ,
~i
i:
~ .
:: ~ a
=.~:
;1:;
i ~;;
.' ~
.; fi::
~..
iH
~j~ ~
$; _:i: 3.
~ : ~ :v
~ i~ ~
~ iH
~ ~ ~:
~ ~ ~ i
~
~
~ .
: ..
~! Q
g .
! " ii
'ji ~ .
.. ] .
i -!. , i
~! .
~ ~ ;:- ; i
. ~= :t ~ ~ "
~ "
u ..
55 ~ . . j .!jJ
.,; .. ~
~ ! ~~2 ~
..
.
d ;1.
hi ·
"
iio 0
,-' !
.~!
i!i
.i,
n,
~;.
IS'
€r!
Ii
.'
"
~!~
. ! ~ .
! ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ 3
5r~ .. .< , . :2
~ i ~ ~ ,
~.o n N Q ; i
~. 11 11 ..!!I
a ..~ ~ Q ~
~ i l i R~lI:~
!
~ " ~ ~ ~ g
~ JI
<
-j(-
! .~,: I
I '." I : .~, ~
r---~----_I _": I
~: I ..~. r --,.----1 ~
t t : ~:: : -:.> : ~ ~
I : -~-i---,~;----~---~ g ~.l
:i I " I \'Jl I I v..{ ~
~_.:- 1.___':.1_ " ~: ~ ~ '
: .::. I 1 i
l- I I ':'.,1 0
~. I ....
-'
,
~,/
~/'
U>:-/
, ,
G/
,
~/
0';:;'/
(;0/'
!
,z-'.j
-
I
, 3
~~-~-~
~ '
~
" 8.
; J ~
~-~
~ ~ ~
~a~4un
~~llil(
~~.5J;I;
t;:!!,..Il! ~ i
""'I);"!
_zi~~
5 ~
"'~~a a 1
.1 " u
I" i I i ~
i
.. . :
:!l ". ,.r~--.;..-." . , .
i!l ~-- ""'-- ."'" ','
. \'1 ' ----.~
''':'. ,I ---
._It) :!:"'~ .'
I m ;o~-
__ :::. ~ ~ 'I
I ~ r~,'
,
I
I
I
,
L,
.
I
I
,
I
L___
'.
/
~,
.~
~.
."
....04 t
,
/ fl'
, ,
, .,
1'"-
'.h
~
wQ
!;:tsa
0>
c..W
::Ja:
Z---:-
<c<C
...J"
c..~
W~
>:E -
en
~:; z
-
UJ
Ww -oJ
J:a: a:I
~<( C <
UJ UJ
c..w C ~
C >
:E~ < a:
0> UJ
< en
"- Oa: UJ 13
/ a:W a:
wen < z
~ffi -,"'''\
< 1'",:(
f.'llf
03: ~tj. ~ '.
'.,'11.. 1+'
Zw
<(en
o
..... .'
o
('II
I
It)
o
o
('II
Ii::!:'] r<;:~"':: XX
fl:i:.t1 ~~:~~~~ <)0'
,..:
en
:J
C
i!i;
--
~
o
u
11111111111-
,..:
t;
;!;
--
U
:J
co
:J
c..
o
o
o
('II
I
It)
Q)
Q)
.....
.....
.1-;...:..
r
. ~ ij
,.. ~-\!'.
<i '"
."
,~.~
~ ~
.. -
:" I
'. :-. '. t
',' ',' f
, 'd I
.-. Hlr:
- .
......,...-,
.)
~.l
~~~~~ -:..-....;...-- ~ ...
..."" ------
~~~~~ -:-:---- - -
___-.:. I
,~.
It)
.....
o
('II
I
o
.....
o
('II
o
('II
o
('II
.
It)
.....
o
('II
<::l
~ ~
C) "l
'l: -J
It)
o
o
('II
I
o
o
o
('II
"
.'
~
, .';......
, } ~ . \ ; ,
('II
1ii j
~
~
""
t j i
~ ~
c ~ 'lI!l
"" ~"
/ ~ ~ lQ~
~ to
\:l
I: lo:
/
. .
I I . . , . . I . I I I . I . .
: : : : , , . I . . . ; ; ; ; ; ; ; i I : 1 I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I'
I I I I I I I I I I I -1 " I _ , !
rl II I rl"I'/o()I~t.:iIJ r ',t-. ~ 11ll' l[ ~m -- - ~.- ~hV :1' inn Jufu
1\ 'II II' ,"" '~ 1 b-~_~-:_>- :~ .~') :. I,
,) I' ,ii/II'> I' kiWl';~;- l'[ -r~,1'~i-- ~ ,:... 'Ii ~ r-ql
,~!> ~':II!I~,; N;.~LI':.:~ , '\ki~IN~,
! I.! .__' ,~~ --' -:.~:.. _ _ _.1 la.;J ......u.... ......... '_m' _,~
. :iB ~li';;VI''''~'''' ..i........r....' il........ ..... ""' ....1111 ....r-..liIl1..... ......II.~ . -III~ i I
,,:h'~f'l i - -- ~_.=oL .i_ I l_I;:' . ~ .,,' i]~.i nCl'I-'~" ~ i'--
r I , " ~J~7 JwL 'I ""In I I
Hl I '-"_I - uf ,. -, L r I_I~:- - n~u}, 1M",~llI,\~' _. 'lfl;~ir'l'J.'.:~. --.'+--
fd I : ! rr L Ii ! / ,'rtIIi'\iUJ -'. _ok 1Z11'!,,"] ,
-. '1 ;:j I J ' 'b'r !., : 11[1 :"-'ll.I."L~
-.-: ~--!I r1!~~~=t~,\,.1':'}1~li lIfT ~l j. :~I~ '~~'-i- _ ';<".-r~~~Fl{
.: :::JJt' .~ m' =to - -] :~'i' / .fL' '-.~, 1, J1 .' '.
00- ..' ~:-)!1 ;;.q':i =:;:::1_ --- - .. r,;;;r . .... i- ____i !', '" '.,
r 7 ._1i1:~ :7:---- -~ IFB V ~'~ I fl':' _ ' ,~r,g:!
--, , . . . ., lit<- 1'- ., 'J" - .. " !
: 1 ~~' . ~, " ,$i I ' ;., ~ ~ i--U" I _.u - ,"": -- - -- 'li.~. '
... r~ ~ 'j,': ' II " i ,.\,.~.,;.V\ I : i - - 'l~ . ,
_.) 1:4 ~ ,.- . or" .' .. \: .. . C r-j- _m ....-~ ....,. __~, J1" ,~'lIp':,
:' i'f"lIi ';,.J :.:..' 1 r E I . -n \,\\"1.1 Iii, 1
_ :1, ~ ,:~ . I,.. 1IIU'rn:l;l" =Jr' - r-- -'.,. IT I~\:- ~."__ f" _-:. I -,-
00 -lIlW IIW fl- 1!1r'P , '1NJ', ~-. !-"'" '- ,
h-= JJ~b I, 1_ _~ ,I_m nm rut: -tlC.,~ -L~U~{ " ~~.,.:
_.: ~m~ ItJijj': r I.' d'''; '.~' 'y" ~~ '.' 111
:..~. 1,1 1. ~"JI' ,. iW~ oilA' -- J_ ~ . ~~. ,i' .~~: ,(,~': 't. ~.~
-:~ ~~ ~~, ~'_r~ I~i; ~~~..;;;, J;. ,"1~ :: 11 - ~ "'#: 6
--; J'J j 1 i -'!" "~ ~ - /J\11} ,1\ "j . "v~\ ~il ffi
: ,~': -r- ~~i.~~I~ -L:,~i" .I;'~' .".' ~.dTI >
; :::: 7~'~:' I'I:'~I':D:~ :.:. .,1 ~ ~ ~.'" g
. u-= '1;, i,,': :' 'lili ' ~ '!J. ~ ~
..:: 1\ !!\ :';: f- i~ I---!~il~) ~ ~ bill.
. _ (... i':;~t '!t!~~.+ S L. i .
:to -. 1111111
nmll
~
/
_A,I
"I
I
G>l
,
Imlll
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~L
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Award Bid/94-30/City Hall Structural Steel
lot
This item will be presented at the City Council meeting.
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
ADMINISTRATION
Richard Fursman
Discussion
ITEM NO.
/.
Sunday Liquor on Ballot
Request:
/ The Council is requested to consider whether or not the question of Sunday liquor should be put
on the November ballot. If the Council chooses not to put it on a ballot, it is likely to appear as a
petitioned item. It is less time consuming and expensive to have it placed on the ballot by the
City Council, as signatures on a petition need to be verified, which will involve several hours and
hundreds of dollars of work.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
ADMINISTRATION
Richard Fursman
Discussion
ITEM NO.
~
Public Works Building Financing
Request:
/ Staff will be presenting material for discussion related to financing of Public Works building.
The attached illustration provides the basic components of one (1) financing scenario.
As you can see, it is the intent to fund City Hall improvements with no issuance of debt.
Contrarily, the Public Works building would require some kind oflong term debt structure which
could be paid off in a variety of ways, which will be discussed at the City Council meeting.
If you have any questions on this information, please call me ahead oftime.
Sheet1
FUNDING DECISION 1996
Function CITY HAll PUBLIC WORKS
Cost New Addition $ 980,000.00 $ 1,600,000.00
Remodel $ 300,000.00 $ 100,000.00
Fumishing $ 100,000.00 $ 25,000.00
total $ 1,380,000.00 $ 1,725,000.00
funding
* Cash $ 1,380,000.00 $ 325,000.00
EDA Bond $ $ 1,400,000.00
*Land to School
Piper Settlement
Interest
PIR
total $ 1,725,000.00
I
I
Page 1
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 20.1996
AGENDA
SECTION
ADMINISTRATION
Richard Fursman
Discussion
ITEM NO.
q,
Rights-of-Way Litigation
Request:
J The Council is requested to consider helping finance the rights-of-way issue facing cities in
Minnesota, sponsored by the League of Minnesota Cities.
The issue at hand centers around the ability for cities to set standards in their various ordinances
for installing utilities in public rights-of-way. The Fifth District Court judge indicated that cities
have the right to impose reasonable regulations. Now, the League wants to prepare to work with
the Public Utilities Commission to counter any further challenges to this decision.
Please review the information provided by the League of Minnesota Cities. The Suburban Rate
Authority is offering membership through June 30, 1997, per no annual assessment upon
Andover's payment to the League of Minnesota Cities of$1,261, which is the requested amount
for participation in the protection of rights-of-way.
If the City decides to help fund the defense of rights-of-way guarantees, then the money could
come out of the Contingency Fund. The Contingency Fund presently has a balance of nearly
$39,000 out of an adopted budget of$41,651.
July 2, 1996
145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, HN 55103-2044
phone: (612) 281-1200 . (800) 925-1122
Fax: (612) 281-1299 . TDD (612) 281-1290
HECEIVED
JUl 0 4 1996
CITY OF ANDOVER
uague of M,Onnesola CiUes
Cities promoting exceUence
Dear Mayor McKelvey and Members of the Andover City Council;
By now, you are probably aware of the rights of way issue facing cities in Minnesota. US
West's challenge to local management of the public rights of way is one ofthe most critical
issues cities have faced in years. It was a topic of considerable discussion at the Annual
Conference, where member cities supported the League Board of Directors decision to move
forward with an aggressive work program and financing plan to counter this challenge. We need
your city to make a special payment to this fund and help put the work plan into action.
The work plan developed by the Rights of Way Task Force and approved by the Board could
cost $325,000 or more. This assumes that a large portion of the work plan will be coordinated
by and implemented through League staff. The Board has agreed to allocate $125,000 from the
current League budget for the work plan and is asking member cities to voluntarily pay
$200,000.
Based on your city's 1995-96 League dues, your suggested minimum payment is $1,261.
/
Please consider this request in July and submit your payment by August 15, 1996 if at all
possible. If each city meets their minimum payment, the $200,000 target is reachable. However,
because it is unlikely that all cities will join this voluntary effort, we encourage members to
allocate more if this initiative is of particular importance to them.
Two important points should be made: First, this is a voluntary payment. As a member of the
League of Minnesota Cities, you are not required to take part in this effort. However, if total city
payments fall significantly short of the $200,000 goal, the League will not be able to fully
undertake the work plan. Second, your voluntary payment should not be confused with your
League membership dues which will be billed at the beginning of September.
The Board of Directors and I understand that this issue must be weighed against the priorities in
your city. However, we believe that the prospect oflosing local control of public property
warrants this extraordinary effort. This is a complicated issue, please consider it carefully.
Enclosed is a brief information sheet to help you in your deliberations. If you have any
questions, contact me at (218) 643-1431, League Executive Director Jim Miller at (612) 280-
1205 or (800) 925-1122, or any member of the Board of Directors.
Sincerely,
4r:d#
,
/
Blaine C. Hill
President, League of Minnesota Cities
cc: City Manager, Ad~~rntercWP€;mrhNlTY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Common questions about
public rights of way
League of Minnesota CiUlla
Cities promoting excellenCfZ
Q Why did local management of public
rights of way become such an issue?
A -In February, US West challenged a
~edwood Falls ordinance that set standards
for installing fiber optic cable in the public right
of way. The ordinance charges a small per foot
fee, requires the cable to be encased in concrete
conduit, or, if that isn't done, limits the city's
liability in case the cable is damaged. US West
asked the Minnesota Public Utilities
Commission (PUC) to take over jurisdiction of
city rights of way, and set aside any local
regulations. Then, US West sued the city of
Redwood Falls in District Court. US West asked
the court to prevent the city from enforcing the
ordinance, and allow them to lay their fiber optic
cable pending resolution of the matter before the
PUc.
QDidn't the District Court rule in favor of
Redwood Falls?
A - Yes. The League intervened on behalf of
~edwood Falls early in the proceedings and
hired outside legal counsel with expertise in
utility law. Those efforts paid off when a Fifth
District Court Judge dismissed the lawsuit
brought by US West. In the order dismissing the
suit, the judge stated essentially that the state law
creating the PUC authorized it to regulate
telephone service providers but did not take
away cities' right to impose reasonable
regulations and to charge a reasonable franchise
fee for the use of their streets and services. The
judge wrote "...The public utility commission
regulates telephone companies, not cities."
QDoesn't that settle things?
ANot necessarily. The District Court ruling
probably will have little bearing on the PUC
ruling, which is expected later this summer. US
West may also appeal the District Court ruling.
Regardless of what happens in these two arenas,
the Legislature will be looking at this issue when
the 1997 session begins in January.
Q Why is this such an important issue?
A-The implications of this case are enormous.
J-\.As deregulation and competition among
telecommunication and utility providers
continues, there will be more and more demand
for access to the ground under city streets. All
kinds of businesses and utilities make use of that
scarce space - telephone companies, cable
television companies, gas companies, power
companies - and so on. If cities are not allowed
to manage the use of the right of way, streets
could be tom up regularly and underground
facilities could become a tangled maze. Imagine
your city completing a major repaving project,
only to have the street tom up by a utility
looking to install lines. Imagine the phone calls
to city hall from irate residents if streets are
blocked offtwo or three times a year. Imagine
your frustration when it becomes obvious that
local taxpayers are being forced to subsidize
private industry and pay higher taxes to build
and maintain city streets.
QSo what is the League of Minnesota
Cities doing?
AAS the magnitude of this issue became
clear, the League Board of Directors
appointed a Rights of Way Task Force to look at
what should be done. Through the course of
several meetings, the Task Force developed a
work program that involves legal, legislative,
and public information strategies to protect
cities' role in managing the public right of way.
The Task Force estimates that full
implementation of the work program could cost
as much as $325,000. The Board has agreed to
finance this work program by allocating
$125,000 from the current League budget and
asking member cities to voluntarily allocate
$200,000.
Q$200.000 is a lot of money. What is the
League going to do with all of that?
A -The work plan includes legal
~epresentation, work with legislative
leaders, and an extensive statewide public
information campaign. While League staff will
take on the bulk of this work, it's likely that
outside assistance will be needed.
QHOW did you decide how much you want
our city to pay?
^ Your suggested payment is based on a
~ercentage of your city's 1995-96 League
dues.
QDO we have to pay? How will the payment
affect our dues?
ANO city if required to pay. This is strictly a
voluntary payment. Also, it's entirely
separate from the League dues statement your
city will receive in September.
Q What if our city decides not to pay?
A-That's your choice. As a member of the
.rt.League of Minnesota Cities, you are not
required to take part in this effort. However, if
total city payments fall significantly short of the
$200,000 goal, the League will not be able to
fully undertake the work plan.
Q Can our city pay more?
ACertainly. In fact, we encourage members
to allocate more to this fund if this initiative
is of particular importance to them. If all
member cities meet their minimum payment, the
$200,000 target is reachable - but it's unlikely
that every city will join this voluntary effort.
QAfter we pay, how can we stay up to date
on the issue?
AWe will keep you informed of any
developments through articles in Cities
Bulletin, direct mailings, and broadcast faxes.
Q Clearly, our payment is only part of the
solution. What else can we do?
A -The best thing city officials can do is stay
J-\..informed, and pass that information along to
as many others as possible. Discuss rights of
way with your local editors and reporters; make
local control a campaign issue for your House
and Senate candidates; talk to your local
Chamber of Commerce about the business
impact of tom-up streets; let taxpayers know
you're working to protect their investment in
streets.
QI'm still confused. Who should I call?
A -If you have more questions, please contact
.L-\..League Executive Director Jim Miller at
(612) 280-1205 or (800) 925-1122, or any
member of the Board of Directors.
/
QSo what is the League of Minnesota
Cities doing?
AAS the magnitude of this issue became
clear, the League Board of Directors
appointed a Rights of Way Task Force to look at
what should be done. Through the course of
several meetings, the Task Force developed a
work program that involves legal, legislative,
and public information strategies to protect
cities' role in managing the public right of way.
The Task Force estimates that full
implementation of the work program could cost
as much as $325,000. The Board has agreed to
finance this work program by allocating
$125,000 from the current League budget and
asking member cities to voluntarily allocate
$200,000.
. /
Q$200, 000 is a lot of money. What is the
League going to do with all of that?
A - The work plan includes legal
J-\..representation, work with legislative
leaders, and an extensive statewide public
information campaign. While League staff will
take on the bulk of this work, it's likely that
outside assistance will be needed.
QHOW did you decide how much you want
our city to pay?
A Your suggested payment is based on a
r\.percentage of your city's 1995-96 League
dues.
QDO we have to pay? How will the payment
affect our dues?
ANO city if required to pay. This is strictly a
voluntary payment. Also, it's entirely
separate from the League dues statement your
city will receive in September.
/
Q What if our city decides not to pay?
A -That's your choice. As a member of the
~eague of Minnesota Cities, you are not
required to take part in this effort. However, if
total city payments fall significantly short of the
$200,000 goal, the League will not be able to
fully undertake the work plan.
Q Can our city pay more?
ACertainlY. In fact, we encourage members
to allocate more to this fund if this initiative
is of particular importance to them. If all
member cities meet their minimum payment, the
$200,000 target is reachable - but it's unlikely
that every city will join this voluntary effort.
QAfter we pay, how can we stay up to date
on the issue?
AWe will keep you informed of any
developments through articles in Cities
Bulletin, direct mailings, and broadcast faxes.
QClearlY, our payment is only part of the
solution. What else can we do?
A - The best thing city officials can do is stay
J-\..informed, and pass that information along to
as many others as possible. Discuss rights of
way with your local editors and reporters; make
local control a campaign issue for your House
and Senate candidates; talk to your local
Chamber of Commerce about the business
impact of tom-up streets; let taxpayers know
you're working to protect their investment in
streets.
QI'm still confused:, Who should I call?
A -If you have more questions, please contact
~eague Executive Director Jim Miller at
(612) 280-1205 or (800) 925-1122, or any
member of the Board of Directors.
SUBURBAN
RATE
AUTHORITY
Dick Fursman
MEMBERS Administrator
BLOOMINGTON City of Andover
BROOKLYN PARK 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW
g~~L~V~~~S Andover, MN 55304-2612
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
DEEPHAVEN RE:
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
FRIDLEY
GREENWOOD
HASTINGS
HOPKINS
LAUDERDALE
LONG LAKE
MAPLE PLAIN
MAPLEWOOD
MINNETONKA
MINNESTRISTA
NEW BRIGHTON
NORTH ST. PAUL
ORONO
OSSEO
'.YMOUTH
.0BBINSDALE
ROSEVILLE
SAVAGE
ST. LOUIS PARK
SHAKO PEE
SHOREVIEW
SPRING PARK
WAYZATA
WEST ST. PAUL
WOODBURY
.'
RECEIVED
AUG 1 2 1996
CITY OF ANDOVER
August 9, 1996
Suburban Rate Authority Membership
Dear Mr. Fursman:
As you may know, the Suburban Rate Authority (SRA) is a joint
powers organization consisting of 33 Twin Cities suburban
cities. For over twenty years the SRA has been a voice for
suburban governments, residents and businesses before the
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC). In the big
dollar world of ratemaking, it is fair to say that SRA
successes have saved suburban ratepayers literally millions of
dollars in electric, gas and telephone rates over this period.
We are entering an era of unprecedented change in the
regulation of utility services, particularly in
telecommunications and electricity. Every city must be
vigilant in protecting its authority over the rights-of-way
and the health, safety and welfare of its residents. In
utility matters before the PUC and in the legislature it is
very difficult for cities to "go it alone". In turn, the SRA
needs each of its members to speak with a voice that will be
heard by the PUC and the utility companies.
The SRA would like to offer vour citv membership in the SRA
throuqh June 30. 1997 for no annual assessment or continuinq
obliqation of anv kind. Upon your city's payment to the
League of Cities of the requested special assessment for the
upcoming legislative debate over right-of-way authority, the
SRA will accept your associate membership upon receipt of a
city council resolution (enclosed). At that time we can
discuss the Joint and Cooperative Agreement that sets forth
the terms of membership.
The SRA supports the League in its efforts to ensure city
protection of rights-of-way and 'makes this offer with the
knowledge and endorsement of the League. The SRA is a
separate organization, distinct from the League or AMM. The
SRA was formed as a regulatory body itself prior to 1975, and
has been an active intervenor in electric, gas and
telecommunication matters since 1975.
470 PILLSBURY CENTER. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402. (612) 337-9300
J
'\
)
, \
,_J
August 9, 1996
Page 2
107668
5U160-3
Enclosed are the following materials that should inform and
assist you in evaluating this invitation:
1. History and Purpose of the SRA
2. Review of 1994, 1995 and 1996 SRA Accomplishments
3. Proposed Resolution Authorizing Membership
4. Membership List and Assessment Structure
An SRA delegate from a neighboring city would be happy to
appear before the city council to answer any questions it may
have. If you have questions please call Jim Strommen, legal
counsel to the SRA, at 337-9233, or you may send an e-mail
message to "attys@kennedy-graven.com".
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
~~
Fred Hanus
City of Minnetonka Delegate
Chair, SRA Executive
:ckr
cc: SRA Executive Committee
James M. Strommen, Esq., Kennedy & Graven
KENNEDY & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
Attorne,. at Law
, ROBERT A. ALSOP
" BRUCE M. BATTERSON
) ROSALD H. BATTY
STEPHEN J. BL'IlUL
JOHN B. DEAN
DANIEL J. CREESSWEIG
DA VlD J. KDiSEDY
CHARLFS L. LEFEHRE
JOliN M. LEFEVRE. JIl.
ROBERT J. LISDALL
ROBERT C. LoNG
JAMES M. STROM'otEN
CORRINE H. THOMSON
470 Pillsbury Cenler, Minneapolis, Mlnnesola 55401
(611) 337.9300
JAMES J. THOMSON
LARRY M. WERTHEIM
BONNIE 1.. Wn.K1NS
JOE Y. YANG
Facsimile (612) 337.9310
DAVID 1.. GRAVEN (192"1"0
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
(612) 3J1-923)
OF COUNSEL
ROBERT C. CARLSON
ROBERT 1.. DAVIDSON
WELUSGTON H. LAw
FLoYD B. OLSON
CUllTIS A. PEARSON
T. JAY SALMEN
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
INTRODUCTION
This summary is intended to describe the history, purposes and
accomplishments of the Suburban Rate Authority (" SRA") .
/
The SRA is a joint powers organization consisting of 33
suburban cities (list of cities attached) that actively intervenes
in matters affecting gas, electric, and telephone rates charged to
suburban residents and businesses. The material below attempts to
demonstrate the tangible savings achieved by the SRA. Though actual
dollar savings are often difficult to calculate, the SRA has saved
residents and businesses of Twin City suburban communities millions
of dollars over the last 20 years. A conservative calculation
reflects a $200,000 per SRA member vote savings since 1975.
HISTORY AND PURPOSES
The SRA was organized in 1963, for the purpose of providing
collective strength in negotiating franchises with the Minneapolis
Gas Company, which served the original SRA members. In 1974, the
legislature adopted the Public Utilities Act to provide for state
regulation of gas and electric utilities, except for cooperative
electric associations and municipal utilities. SRA assisted the
state in setting up regulation and intervened in the early gas and
electric cases with the hope of providing leadership and direction
in utility regulation. Since that time, it has been active in
matters concerning gas, electric and telephone rate regulation and
in legislation concerning the Public Utilities Commission ("PUC").
'.
, )
JMSI05177
su160-3
RECENT INVOLVEMENT
/ 1996 Model Wireless Communication Lease Aqreement. The SRA
provided primary drafting contributions to a League of
Minnesota Cities Model Site Lease Agreement for PCS/cellular
communication antennas. This Model has been distributed to
Minnesota cities for use in negotiation on site lease
agreements.
1996 US West Riqht-of-Way Challenqe. A significant legal challenge
to municipal authority over rights-of-way was brought by US
West to the PUC and the district court. The SRA took an
active position in support of the League and the other cities
involved directly in the challenge. This issue will be the
subject of legislation in the 1997 Minnesota legislative
session.
, j
1996 Minneqasco Case. The SRA and the Department Public Service
successfully argued against a $1 million annual acquisition
adjustment (23 years of recovery requested) Minnegasco sought
to recover from ratepayers for its acquisition of Midwest Gas.
In addition, the SRA criticized the allocation of Minnegasco
to residential customers and the Commission ultimately denied
Minnegasco's proposed change, saving residential customers
money. The residential basic service charge also remained at
the same level ($5 per month) as supported by the SRA.
1995 Updated Model Gas and Electric Utility Franchises. The SRA
and the League drafted model utility franchise ordinances.
The increasing deregulation in both the electric and gas
utility industries necessitated revisions to the previous
model franchise ordinances approved by the SRA.
1995 Minneqasco Fixed Residential Cu~tomer Cha~qe. The PUC denied
Minnegasco's request for an ~ncrease ~n the residential
customer fixed monthly gas charge from $5 to $6 per month.
The SRA was the sole party to argue that Minnegasco must make
a greater showing to justify requested and intended increases
in the fixed, non-usage based monthly charge. The requested
increase was made without a showing that statutorily required
conservation policies would not be inhibited.
1995 Model Telecommunications Permit Ordinance. The SRA prepared
and shared its Model Telecommunications Permit Ordinance with
the League of Minnesota Cities. In collaboration, the SRA and
the League distributed the ordinance to all Minnesota cities.
The purpose of the ordinance is to provide orderly pOlice
power regulations over telecommunications companies in the
city. This ordinance will be reviewed in light of the 1996
Telecommunications Act and legal developments resulting from
it.
,
1993 Minneqasco and NSP Rate Cases-FAS 106. The SRA played a
substantial role in one of the major issues to be raised
)
JMSIOSl77
SU160-3
2
'~1
before the Minnesota PUC in several years--FAS 106. A post
retirement medical health care benefits "transition
obligation" was sought by Minnegasco and NSP as a result of
the accounting standard known as FAS 106 which required a
change from cash basis to accrual accounting for such
benefits. This change involves millions of dollars
(Minnegasco $24 million; NSP $160 million) to be borne
currently either by the utility shareholders or utility
ratepayers. The PUC originally voted in May 1993 to disallow
one-half of Minnegasco' s transition obligation, but ultimately
reversed its decision and allowed those expenses. These
expenses will be spread out over a twenty year period in
rates. This issue is an example of the millions of dollars at
stake in utility rates the SRA fights to limit for ratepayers.
/
1992
US West Telephone Rate Savinqs. As of November 1, 1992,
residential and business telephone rates for US West Twin City
local calling area became equal by class of service throughout
the metropolitan area. This PUC action eliminated the tiered
telephone rates that was in existence since 1980. The US West
Tier System charged higher rates for residential and business
customers living in the suburban areas. In 1984 the SRA
achieved a reduction of one half of the tier ratios. This
elimination of the Tier System is a direct result of SRA's
intervention and arguments against differentiating telephone
rates by geographic location.
/ 1992 Municipal Pumpinq Rate Savinqs. Together with the City of St.
Paul and the Municipal Pumpers Association, SRA efforts have
consistently maintained pumpinq class rates at 2-3% below
qeneral service class and have continued the municipal pumping
exemption from the eleven-month demand ratchet rate imposed on
commercial-industrial users. The SRA's expert consultant has
estimated that avoiding the eleven-month demand ratchet charge
alone saves 7.5-10% in annual municipal pumping charges paid
to NSP.
1991 NSP General Rate Filinq. The SRA actively intervened in this
NSP filing, wherein the PUC rejected NSP's $120,000,000 rate
increase request. The SRA focused on the municipal pumpers'
rate and street lighting. The SRA is traditionally the only
intervenor seeking reduced increases in the municipal pumping
rate and has seen consistent success in that effort.
1990 US West Incentive Requlation Plan. We actively intervened in
the case involving US West's request to be partially
deregulated in its local service to residential and business
customers. The final order established stable rates for Twin
City local telephone customers of US West through August of
1994. US West will share 50% of its revenues above a 13.5%
return on equity.
"
,
)
JMS105177
SU160-3
3
1987 Northwestern Bell Extended Area Service Docket. The SRA made
significant progress in demonstrating cost in equities in the
-' Twin City Metropolitan Area Northwestern Bell service area.
SRA participation in this case helped lay the ground work for
the order abandoning the Tier System.
1986 Redeliberation on Northwestern Bell Cases. The SRA obtained
very substantial reductions in the Tier System ratios. These
changes resulted in very significant savings in telephone
rates for most SRA business and residential users prior to the
elimination of this rate design in 1992.
1985 Rate Structure Task Force. The SRA was active in the
formulation of funding proposals for the Combined Sewer
Overflow ("CSO") projects in the Cities of Minneapolis, St.
Paul and South St. Paul. SRA involvement may have limited the
pass-through of these costs to member communities.
1985 Northern States Power General Rate Case. The SRA "pioneered"
an issue as to fossil fuel inventory. The SRA also helped
maintain the municipal pumping rate, and defended prior SRA
accomplishments as to accounting practices. Very substantial
savings were realized through SRA intervention. This case was
appealed to the Court of Appeals and the State Supreme Court
and the SRA (alone) participated with MPUC in successfully
defending MPUC's action.
,
ESTIMATED DOLLAR SAVINGS FROM SRA EFFORTS
These are rough calculations made with the assistance of legal
counsel and SRA expert consultants. In an effort to be able to
contrast savings with assessments, the calculations are made on a
per SRA member vote basis (5,000 of population). They attempt to
distinguish savings resulting primarily from SRA efforts and
savings that likely would have resulted anyway due to positions
taken by state agencies.
1975 NSP. SRA's retained expert estimated $18 to $20 per
household. Using 3.4 persons per household, this would be
approximately $26,500 per vote. The figure does not include
business savings.
1977 NSP. There is no estimate of dollar savings in the file.
The 1975 principles were defended successfully. It is thus
reasonable to state that the $26,500 per vote continued from
1975 and onward. To be conservative, use five years of
$132,000 per vote for NSP electric through 1980.
,
\
J
1982 Northwestern Bell. The SRA commenced its attack on the
Tier System. In 1984, the SRA won a significant victory
reducing by 50% the tier ratios imposed by Bell. Northwestern
Bell has estimated a shift away from suburban communities of
about $2 million to $3 million per year as a result of SRA
JMS105177
5U160-3
4
/
intervention in the three Bell rate cases through the 1980's.
Using $2 million per year and the assumption that SRA
represents approximately half of the suburban businesses and
households (this has not been calculated, it is just an
estimate), the savings is about $6500 per vote per year. Over
the seven years, since this change became effective, this is
$45,500 per vote.
"
1985 NSP. Our consultant estimated savings due solely to SRA
intervention at about $8 per household per year. Over the two
years the rate was in effect, this is a savings of about
$23,500 per vote.
1987 NSP. Estimated savlngs from the fuel lssue lS $1,600 per
vote per year.
Uniform Franchises. The gas and electric uniform franchises
were negotiated in the 1980's at a cost of approximately $40
per vote. Attorney and staff costs for doing it individually
might easily have been ten times that, a savings of $1260 per
member or $360 per vote.
1992 NSP. As mentioned above, the savings per SRA member lS
about 2-3% per year for municipal pumping rates and 7.5-10% In
avoiding ratchet demand.
/
1992 US West. The savings from elimination of the Tier System
to tier 2 and 3 SRA residents and businesses is approximately
$1 million per year and counting.
1996 Minneqasco. Collective savings to SRA residents from SRA
efforts in the 1996 Minnegasco case is approximately $300,000
per year.
Summary. A conservative estimate of dollar savinqs to SRA
members because of SRA activities, directly and indirectly,
over the years since 1975 is well over $200,000 per vote and
countinq. A case could be made for multiples of this figure.
1
)
JMSIOSl77
SlJ160-3
5
"
/
'.
/
Bloomington
Brooklyn Park
Burnsville
Circle Pines
Columbia Heights
Deephaven
Eden prairie
Edina
Fridley
Greenwood
Hastings
Hopkins
Lauderdale
Long Lake
Maple Plain
Maplewood
Minnetonka
/
JMS105177
5U160-3
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
MEMBER CITIES
Minnetrista
New Brighton
North St. Paul
Orono
Osseo
Plymouth
Robbinsdale
Roseville
St. Louis Park
Savage
Shakopee
Shoreview
Spring Park
Wayzata
West St. Paul
Woodbury
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ANNUAL REVIEW 1994
The following is a brief summary intended for the city councils of Suburban Rate Authority ("SRA") member
cities. It highlights the major activities and achievements of the SRA during 1994. The SRA is a joint
powers association of 32 Twin Cities suburban municipalities that monitors rates and rate design issues of
electric, gas, telephone utilities and Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services. The SRA was very active
and successful in several far-reaching issues affecting member city ratepayers and Minnesota cities generally.
Telecommunications Legislation
In the fall of 1994, the SRA Board authorized counsel to participate in legislative issues affecting cities
relating to the alternative telephone regulation bill (local service de-regulation) then expected to be offered
in the 1995 legislative session. The SRA assisted the lobbying efforts of the League of Minnesota Cities in
two important issues relating to that legislation: clarifying and broadening the police power of cities in the
new competitive environment for a local telephone service and addressing cities rights to compensation for
telecommunications utility use of public property. As of the date of this report, those SRA supported issues
have been incorporated into the biII which passed out of both the Senate and House Committees and is being
debated in the legislature at the time of this Review. The Department of Public Service will be authorized
by this biII to issue a comprehensive report by February 15, 1996 recommending a unifollll state policy on
franchise fees for use of public property by utilities. Currently no telecommunications companies to pay
franchise fees to Minnesota cities and the law is unclear regarding the rights of cities to require fees over and
above regulatory cost. The SRA advocated a clarification on this issue and actively assisted in the inclusion
of this study, in lieu of the right to require franchise fees in the current bill. The SRA wiII be actively
involved in the DPS study if this bill passes.
,
'~
Model Telecommunications Permit Ordinance
The SRA also drafted a model telecommunications pellllit ordinance to establish unifollll requirements
regarding important issues to cities in the new competitive telecommunications environment: pennit fees,
location and relocation requirements, repair requirements, perfollllance bonds, Gopher State One infollllation
and other provisions. The telephone deregulation bill language broadening city police power would further
ensure the enforceability of these telecommunications pellllit ordinances. The Minnesota League of Cities
has requested that the model pellllit ordinance be used as a basis for the League's model ordinance for
distribution to its members.
Minnegasco 1994 Rate Case
The SRA won a significant victory for residential ratepayers served by Minnegasco in limiting
increases in the fixed customer service charge Minnegasco sought. In 1993 Minnegasco won a 67% increase
(from $3 to $5) in a fixed non-usage based customer charge for its residential customers. This increase was
augmented by the elimination of a credit for gas usage. In the 1994 filing, Minnegasco sought again to
increase its $5 charge to $6, stating that it intended to continue these increases in subsequent rate filings.
The SRA was the sole party to criticize this increase as contrary to conservation goals established by the
legislature and otherwise unsupported by evidence in the record. The DPS supported the increase. The PUC
agreed with the SRA and denied Minnegasco's increase, citing conservation concerns and lack of customer
acceptance. This PUC decision has ramifications for both gas and electric utilities and places a greater burden
on the utilities in future rate filings to justify an increase in non-usage based charges.
\
JMS87296
8U160-3
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ANNUAL REVIEW 1995
"
.J
The following is a brief summary intended for the city councils of Suburban Rate Authority ("SRAn) member
cities. It highlights the major activities and achievements of the SRA during 1995. The SRA is a joint
powers association of 32 Twin Cities suburban municipalities that monitors rates and rate design issues of
electric. gas and telecommunications utilities. 1995 and 1996 have been extremely active and successful years
for the SRA.
Model Telecommunications Permit Ordinance
The SRA drafted a model telecommunications pennit ordinance in conjunction with the League of Minnesota
Cities to establish unifonn requirements regarding important issues to cities in the new competitive
telecommunications environment: pennit procedure and fees. location and relocation requirements, repair
requirements. perfonnance bonds. indemnity and other provisions. The recentIy-enacted Federal
Telecommunications Act of 1996 includes important and debated language regarding cities' right to manage
and receive compensation for use of the right-of-way. The SRA!League Model Ordinance pre-dates the Act
but establishes many of the vital protection cities need when telecommunications carriers seek to expand
within the City and expressly preserves rights to franchising or leasing.
"
Minnegasco 1995 Rate Case
The SRA actively intervened on behalf of ratepayers in Minnegasco's 1995 petition for a $24.3 million rate
increase and a 7.7% requested increase for residential customers. The SRA. through its expert witness.
Robert Towers of Chesapeake Regulatory Consultants. has challenged a $1 million annual claimed ratepayer
expense resulting from Minnegasco's purchase of the Midwest Gas system. The SRA also argues that
Minnegasco exaggerates the revenue deficiency created by the residential customer class rates and has not
shown a justification for an increase in the fixed monthly residential customer charge. The AU adopted the
SRA arguments challenging the $1 million Midwest Gas acquisition adjustment that. if accepted by the PUC.
will save SRA residents and businesses approximately $215.000 annuallv. The PUC will decide on the
petition during the summer of 1996.
_/
Model Gas and Electric Franchise Ordinances
Again in partnership with the League of Minnesota Cities. the SRA updated its unifonn gas and electric utility
franchises to assist its member cities in negotiating new franchises. Of particular interest to cities in today's
changing fiscal environment is the right to charge franchise fees. In addition. electric utilities are likely to
be deregulated within the next decade. Tenns and conditions of franchises become increasingly important
to those utilities when-they perceive that franchise tenns may affect competition.
Electric Industry Deregulation
The SRA intervened in a long-tenn investigation and review by the PUC of the electric utility industry. The
PUC will be making a recommendation regarding if and when electric service should be deregulated for retail
customers. The SRA has opposed utility company suggestions that eminent domain rights be equalized
between cities and investor-owned utilities and that franchise rights be diminished. The SRA will continue
to monitor the proceedings.
\
'. ./
Customer Service Task Force
The SRA was invited to participate on a task force for the PUC on customer liability and service issues. The
task force addressed issues on notice to customers. liability of innocent residential customers for past unpaid
debts of prior customers living at the new residence and dispute resolution procedures.
JMS103351
SU160-)
"
1996-97 SRA PROJECTS & ANTICIPATED PROJECTS
./
To assist in the 1997 SRA Budget review process. the following is infonnation describing the types
of issues the SRA is currently addressing and those in which we believe the SRA will be involved to protect
residential. business. and city government ratepayers of SRA members. Given the quantity of important
issues, it is possible that the SRA will be required to focus only on two of three of these issues to stay within
its budget constraints. These matters are in addition to the General budget item that usually carries the largest
component of any SRA annual budget. The General category includes quarterly meetings. member and non-
member communications and on-going identification of new issues that may arise.
1. CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY CONTROL AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS. On
February 23, 1996, US West filed a petition with the PUC requesting an order limiting city rights to control
the rights-of-way. This petition seeks broad PUC authority and limits on cities. The SRA has intervened
and will be working closely with the League of Cities and other interested public bodies to protect city
authority to control and receive compensation for utility use of the public right-of-way. This issue will likely
come before the 1997 legislature for comprehensive review and possible new law. The SRA and all
Minnesota cities should regard this matter as vitally important.
2. MINNEGASCO GAS RATE INCREASES. The SRA has been successful in the
,
" ) administrative hearing portion of the 1995 Minnegasco rate increase petition advocating no recovery from
ratepayers for Minnegasco's acquisition premium for the Midwest Gas assets. Minnegasco has been very
aggressive in the 1990s in seeking rate increases and the SRA is one of the few non-state agency parties to
vigorously contest several of the more significant recovery requests. The SRA will continue to seek the
lowest possible rates for SRA residents and businesses.
3. CITY WATER TOWER LEASES FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS. The
Telecommunications Act of 1996 has spawned numerous applications for wireless communication antennae
on city water tower sites. The SRA has been very active in coordinating a League of Cities sponsored worlc
group to establish a model site lease agreement for use by cities. Each lease will be influenced by the many
market considerations such as lease payments, tennination rights. interference issues and other matters. This
group effort will greatly assist cities in their negotiations with cellular. PCS and other wireless communica-
tions applicants.
, \
'. /
4. ELECfRlC INDUSTRY DEREGULATION. The PUC is conducting an ongoing
investigation into the deregulation of the electric utility industry. At issue for retail ratepayers will be the
opportunities and burdens that will result when customers are able to purchase power from providers other
than the franchised-provider in the service area. Cities also will be affected greatly as large customers with
significant purchasing clout and as being forced to deal with potential negative consequences if certain
residential customers are unable to benefit from de-regulation.
JMS103351
SU160-3
,
/
,
i
/
,
'- )
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
ASSESSMENT STRUCTURE
ANNUAL
CITY VOTES' ASSESSMENT
Bloomington 18 7200.00
Brooklyn Park 12 4800.00
Burnsville 11 4400.00
Circle pines 1 400.00
Columbia Heights 4 1600.00
Deephaven 1 400.00
Eden Prairie 8 3200.00
Edina 10 4000.00
Fridley 6 2400.00
Greenwood 1 400.00
Hastings 4 1600.00
Hopkins 4 1600.00
Lauderdale 1 400.00
Long Lake 1 400.00
Maple Plain 1 400.00
Maplewood 7 2800.00
Minnetonka 10 4000.00
Minnetrista 1 400.00
New Brighton 5 2000.00
North St. Paul 3 1200.00
Orono 2 800.00
Osseo 1 400.00
Plymouth 11 4400.00
Robbinsdale 3 1200.00
Roseville - 7 2800.00
Savage 2 800.00
Shakopee 3 1200.00
Shoreview 5 2000.00
Spring Park 1 400.00
St. Louis Park 9 3600.00
Wayzata 1 400.00
West St. Paul 4 1600.00
Woodbury 5 2000.00
163 65200.00
population, 1990 census
one vote per 5,000 in population, or fraction thereof
..
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY; AND DESIGNATING A
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY AS ITS MEMBER ON
THE BOARD OF THE SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the City of
is authorized by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59 to enter into joint and
cooperative agreements with other governmental units; and
WHEREAS, the Suburban Rate Authority has been effective voice
for suburban Metropolitan Area cities and residents, as a
regulatory body from 1962 through 1974 and as an intervenor in gas,
electric and telecommunications matters from 1975 to the present;
,
)
and
WHEREAS, the city council has determined it is in that the
City's best interests to cooperate with other municipalities in the
monitoring of utility services in the Metropolitan Area by
participating in the Suburban Rate Authority; and
WHEREAS, the SRA has offered an associate membership to the
City through June 30, 1997, with a waiver of the assessment of
$400.00 per year per 5,000 in population, or fraction thereof; and
WHEREAS, there are numerous important issues facing cities in
gas, electric and telecommunications matters that require joint and
cooperative efforts by and among cities.
'\
, )
JMSI08341
8U160-3
.
.
\
)
\
/
I
j
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
, Minnesota as follows:
1.
The city of
will become an associate
member of the SRA in accordance with the terms of the SRA offer of
August 9, 1996.
The Manager and
are authorized
and directed to execute and deliver the documents and certificates
necessary to effect associate membership in the SRA.
2. The manager/administrator is authorized and directed to
contact the SRA regarding the City's decision to become an
associate member as offered and to obtain the details of associate
membership.
3 .
is designated as the city's first
director on the Board of Directors of the Suburban Rate Authority
and
is designated as the alternate.
4. The City Clerk is directed to prepare a certified copy of
this resolution for filing and mailing to the Suburban Rate
Authority.
Passed and adopted this
day of
, 1996.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
JMS108341
SU16Q-3
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
EDA - Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance S\~0'
Jean D. McGann
lITEM NO. 10.
PURCHASE OF TAX LADIES, INC. PARCELS
The Andover Economic Development Authority is requested to consider purchasing two parcels of land in the
auto salvage area which are currently owned by Tax Ladies, Inc. The purchase price of these parcels is
$13,504.00.
Enclosed is a letter from Mr. William Hawkins indicating that an agreement has been reached.
/
/
LAw OffiCES OF
William G. Hawkins and Associates
-'
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
BARRY A. SULLIVAN
Legal Assistant
WENDY B. DEZELAR
2140 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH
ANOKA. MINNESOTA 55303
PHONE (612) 427-8877
August 8, 1996
Ms. Jean McGann
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Tax Ladies, Inc. Purchase
Dear Jean:
We have reached agreement to buy two additional parcels of land in the auto salvage
area which are currently owned by Tax Ladies, Inc. We are planning on closing these
within the next several weeks and I will need a check payable to Chicago Title
Jnsurance Company in the amount of $13,504.00. Would you please have this
approved by the city council at its earliest convenience.
/
illiam G. Hawkins
WGH:wbd
Ene.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
I
DATE: August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Reports of Staff, Committees, Commissions Todd J. Haas,.JJ6"
Parks ~
ITEM NO.
Water Usage/Sunshine Park
Il.
The City Council is requested to discuss the water usage and how the usage should be paid
for in Sunshine Park.
If you recall, the City Council discussed this issue at the special meeting between the City
Council and the Park and Recreation Commission of July 10, 1996.
Attached is the agenda item and meeting minutes of July 10, 1996 for review.
Note: Also attached is the June 7, 1994 meeting minutes of the City Council as to the
discussion of a well vs. municipal water.
)
There is an item on the agenda ordering a feasibility report for the possibility of installing a
well.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: July 10 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ITEM NO. ~
Consider Using Contingency Fund for Water
Usage & Cleaning at Sunshine Park
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Todd Haas~.
Parks ~..
3.
The City Council is requested to discuss the possibility of using the contingency fund to pay for
water usage and cleaning at the Sunshine Park for the remainder of 1996 as requested by the
Park and Recreation Commission.
The City Council has already approved the use of park dedication funds for the cleaning of the
building through 1996 and this will be a budgeted item in 1997.
The bill for water usage at the fields for the 2nd quarter was about $4,000. We are assume
, the 3rd quarter will be closer to about $6,000.
)
At this point. $28.000 is available in the contingency fund. Jean McGann will be at the
meeting to answer any questions you may have.
.'
\
I
Joint Andover City Council/Park and Recreation Commission Meeting
Minutes - July 10, 1996
Page 2
J
{Discussion 1997 Park Capital Improvement Budget, Continued}
The Park Commissioners again noted the increased demand from residents
to improve the parks. Funding is still needed to complete Kelsey-Round
Lake Park~ to develop a trail system, to upgrade existing parks to meet
safety and ADA standards, and to light the fields at Sunshine Community
Park. They have worked with a $25,000 Capital Improvement Fund budget
since 1989, and it doesn't go very far.
After further discussion, the Council generally felt there is a need to
increase the Capital Improvement Fund for parks. A figure of $60,000
for the 1997 budget was suggested; however, because the Council had not
yet reviewed the proposed 1997 budget, it was understood that that may
not be a firm figure.
Park Commission Chairperson Lindahl stated they were not looking for a
specific number at this time, but came to inform the Council of the
increased demand from residents and to point out the funding needs. Park
Commissioner Grabowski stated there has been discussion about having a
park fee added to the building permit fees. Mayor McKelvey didn't
believe that is legal at this time.
(Mayor McKelvey left the meeting at 7:10 p.m.; Councilmember Jacobson
served as Acting Mayor for the remainder of the joint meeting.)
Mr. Starr stated the most requests are for a trail system. Acting Mayor
Jacobson suggested the Commission look at the comprehensive trails map
again, as he felt it is not feasible or desirable to have trails alon~
all of the major roadways in the City. Mr. Haas stated the Park
Commission has established a Pathway Task Force that will review the
needs and recommend a trail system. The concentration will be in the
urban area, leaving the trails along the existing shoulders of county
roads in the rural areas for now.
.""" CONSIDER USING CONTINGENCY FUND FOR WATER USAGE AT SUNSHINE PARK
.'
Acting Mayor Jacobson expressed surprise at the high cost of watering
the fields at Sunshine Park. He asked about the cost of installing a
separate well just for that park. Commissioner O'Toole stated that was
originally discussed and rejected by the Council. He recalled the cost
would be about $20,000. At this time Acting Mayor Jacobson thought it
may be more economical to install a well than to pay the cost of
watering through the City's municipal system. He urged Staff to
research the specific costs of installing a well, to determine the costs
of watering through the municipal system, and to find the breakeven
point. Park Commission Chairperson Lindahl also pointed out the
concern with the municipal system is the water restrictions. There is
thousands of dollars worth of sod on the fields that could be destroyed
of not watered as needed. He felt the cost of a private well would hav2
to come out of Park Dedication funds.
Joint Andover City council/Park and Recreation Commission Meeting
Minutes - July 10, 1996
Page 3
(Discuss Using Contingency Fund for Water Usage at Sunshine Park,
Con tinued)
Acting Mayor Jacobson asked if it is legal to forgive the costs of
watering the fields at Sunshine Park. Ms. McGann explained the water
fund is supposed to be self-supporting, paid strictly by user fees. The
General Fund is paid for from resident taxes and other feefl. By
forgiving the fees for parks, the water fund would be contributing to
parks; and she didn't know if there are sufficient funds to do that. She
noted there is about $35,000 remaining in the Contingency Fund.
After further discussion, Staff was directed to research the cost of
installing a private well with the possibility of installing it yet this
fall. While there was some support to pay for the costs already
incurred for water usage at Sunshine Park from the Contingency Fund, no
specific action was taken on the item.
Acting Mayor Jacobson asked for a motion to adjourn the joint City
Council/Park and Recreation Commission Meeting.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Dehn, to so move. Motion carried on a 3-
Yes, 2-Absent (McKelvey, Kunza) vote.
The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
j
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
Recording Secretary
j
f"
~
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - June 7, 1994
Page 7
(School District Request for Purchase of City Property, Continued)
Other Council comments were to have a determination of the costs of
extending the sewer line to serve the proposed middle school property,
to negotiate terms for that sewer extension, and to discuss the other
concerns ot the Council with the school district.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Dalien, to authorize the Staff to sit
down and discuss with the School Staff and relay our concerns to them
and get a dialog going, and for Staff to report back to us of what they
find out. Motion carried unanimously.
AMEND ORDINANCE 55 AND RESOLUTION 092-92
Councilmember Jacobson questioned the enforceability of Item B in the
resolution. Frank Stone, Public Works Superintendent, stated they do
look for dripping faucets when making their inspections in houses.
Councilmember Jacobson questioned Item D, deliberately allowing
irrigation or sprinkling water to run into the street or drains. Mr.
Stone stated the residents should be able to control the water run off
so it is not wasted.
Council agreed to the following change in Item H: "The Water Department
/ shall shut off water at the street following the third violation until
such time as the property owner agrees to comply with the restrictions.
(Last sentence to remain the same.)
Item I: A suggested change was, "Additional curtailment of water usage
in dry weather will be by order of the City Administrator. When
restricted, no person..." There was some concern with this item, as all
other items related to restrictions, and this item relates to
prohibitions. Staff was asked to review the Item and make the necessary
changes and clarifications.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Jacobson, to adopt the Resolution with the
changes (including Staff review of Item I). (See Resolution R109-94)
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, the Ordinance amending Ordinance
No. 55 as presented (with the changes noted above) Motion carried
unanimously.
~
CITY HALL PARK COMPLEX #2 IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCE DISCUSSION /
.'
IP93-7
/
Mr. Davidson explained the City is required to establish a comprehensive
review of their water system by 1995, including pumping rates, total
amount of water used over an annual period, number of wells, storage
available, etc. Even with Well #4 on the system, the pumping rates
can't keep up with the demand on the system. With the appropriation for
~,:gUlar
"... ~~nutes
Page 8
fA
".
Andover City Council Meeting
- June 7, 1994
-:;;
/
(City Hall Park Complex #2 Irrigation/IP93-7, Continued)
as few wells as possible, it is felt the City would not get permission
to drill a well for irrigating athletic fields. He requested permission
to work with Mr. Stone to obtain the background information on the water
system now, which will be needed before asking for another well. One of
the sugges~ions has been to create a well field around Well #4 to tie
into Pumphouse #4, which could also eliminate water treatment in each
pumphouse. They would prepare the documentation needed along with the
conceptual plan of the well field and when the next well should be added
to the system.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, the Council authorizes the use
of the municipal water for the ball fields for the irrigation system (in
City Hall park Complex #2) DISCUSSION: Mr. Haas stated the Park and
Recreation Commission is looking at charging user fees to help pay for
the use of the water for irrigation. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Perry, that we direct Staff and the
~consulting engineers to prepare a feasibility report on adding a well
c....,v. and exploring the concept of a well field, and report back to us
~ sometime in the near future. (See Resolution RllO-94) Motion carried
unanimously.
ACCEPT FEASIBILITY STUDY/IP94-9/FOX WOODS
/
Council noted the proposed plat is not zoned for urban residential
development. Mr. Haas stated the developer is aware that there is no
guarantee the property will be rezoned, but he wishes to proceed anyway.
Attorney Hawkins stated the developer will sign the Development Contract
to accept the assessments and waive any right to an appeal. The Council
will have no obligation to rezone the property as a result of this
action.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Dalien, the Resolution (See Resolution
Rlll-94 accepting feasibility study, waiving public hearing, ordering
improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications for
improvement of Project 94-9) Motion carried unanimously.
ACCEPT FEASIBILITY STUDY/IP94-6/HARTFIEL'S ESTATES AND IP94-7/SHARON'S
2ND ADDITION
Mr. Haas noted a petition was received from Hartfiel's Estates about two
months ago. Mr. Davidson stated the Hartfiel's owns about 13 lots in
Hartfiel's Estates, and the discussion has been to assess the concrete
curb and gutter and streets to those lots' on which this project is being
imposed, and defer the assessments until they connect to the sewer and
water. The lots owned by the Hartfiel's and those who want to connect
immediately would be assessed for both the streets and utilities.
Council asked that the amount of potential deferment be made available
to them at the public hearing.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE AM~M~t :8, 1996
AGENDA
t-.O.
SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion
~41
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
t-.O.
Approve Ordinance Summary
Ordinance No. 114
Establishing Buffer Strips and Standards
for the Protection of Wetlands
Jeff Johnson
Planning
~
la.
The City Council is asked to review and approve the attached ordinance summary of
Ordinance No. 114, An Ordinance Establishing Buffer Strips and Standards for the
Protection of Wetlands. The City Council approved the Ordinance at the July 16, 1996
meeting.
The ordinance summary was tabled at the August 6,1996 meeting. Staff mistakenly
placed language in the ordinance that would require all lots to maintain buffer strips until
all landscaping (seed/sod establishment) was completed. The minutes at the July 16,
1996 meeting (see attached minutes) reflect that this language should not have been
added to the ordinance or ordinance summary. Staff has revised the ordinance and the
summary to reflect this change.
In approving the summary, the Council must fmd that the publication of the title and
summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. A
four-fifths (4/5) vote is required to approve the summary for publication.
, )
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 114 SUMMARY
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING BUFFER STRIPS AND STANDARDS FOR THE
PROTECTION OF WETLANDS
The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain:
STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND POLICY
Statutory Authorization
This ordinance (establishing buffer strips and standards for the protection of wetlands) is
adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 105, Minnesota Regulations, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900, and the planning and
zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462.
Policy
/
The City finds it necessary to regulate the use of lands surrounding wetlands. Buffer
strips (defined as a sixteen and one-half wide area abutting all wetlands that shall be left
undisturbed or in its natural condition during the development, building and landscaping
phases) are necessary and beneficial to maintaining the health of wetlands. These strips
of land surrounding wetlands protect their shorelines from erosion, while serving to filter
sediment, chemicals and other nutrients before storm water discharges into the wetland.
Buffer strips are also beneficial in providing habitat for wildlife.
All lots of record created thirty (30) days after the adoption of this ordinance shall
establish and maintain buffers strips during the development and building phases.
GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
Jurisdiction
The provisions ofthis ordinance shall apply to the City of Andover.
Enforcement
The City Administrator or its duly authorized employees shall be responsible for the
administration and enforcement of this ordinance.
/
Interpretation
I
In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this ordinance shall be held to be
minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the governing body
and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by State
Statutes.
Abrogation and Greater Restrictions
It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrograte, or impair any existing easements,
covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance imposes greater
restrictions, the provisions of this ordinance shall prevail. All other ordinances
inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent ofthe inconsistency
only.
A printed copy ofthis ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular
office hours ofthe City Clerk and at the Andover Branch ofthe Anoka County Library.
/
J
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - July 16, 1996
Page 11
:1
APPROVE WETLAND BUFFER ORDINANCE
Mr. Carlberg explained the proposed ordinance will establish a 16.5-foot
buffer strip to protect wetlands through development and building
construction. Silt fences that are used to delineate the wetland
boundaries will be moved out to protect that buffer strip. The fence
will be left up until the landscaping is completed. The land owners
then take over and can do what they want with the buffer strip. This
ordinance does not impact the home owner.
Jerry Windschitl, Ashford Development, noted under Section 7, it will be
impossible to obtain a variance under Ordinance 8 because it is not
practical to show a hardship variance. Staff should have the ability to
look at this during the grading plan and decide as to whether or not a
buffer area should be disturbed. There are cases where the buffer has to
be disturbed for erosion control, grading or maintaining slopes, etc.
Byron Westlund, Woodland Development, noted in Section 6, the word
monuments is used, but there is no definition. Also, at a special
meeting with the Council, the developers discussed the size limitations
to which these regulations will apply. If there are smaller wetlands in
the middle of a back yard, the buffer strip could virtually eliminate
the yard. Once the property owner takes over, everything they tried to
do could be eliminated.
/) Winslow Holasek understood the protection is for wetlands, not storm
water ponds. He didn't understand why storm water ponds are required
since the wetlands are a natural filter of pollutants; yet now they must
filter the water before it gets to the wetlands and put it directly int~
the ground water supply. It makes no sense to him.
Mr. Carlberg felt it is difficult to set a minimum size to which the
ordinance would apply. Each would have to be looked at separately, but
he felt it would apply to wetlands of 1 to 2 acres or more in size.
~
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Dehn, the Ordinance as presented with
the following changes on Page 4:
Section 6,
2, change
measures) .
Wetland Buffer Strip Protection Plan, first paragraph, Item
"monuments" to "measures" (Location of wetland buffer
Section 7, Variances, Sections a and b, reference to "Ordinance No.8,
Section 5.04" be changed to "Ordinance 10, Section 17"; and in Section
b, change "variance shall only be" to "variance may only be granted...".
Motion carried on a 3-Yes, 2-No (McKelvey as he didn't believe this is
necessary, Kunza) vote.
,
)
APPROVE AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT POLICY GUIDELINES
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Kunza, to approve the request. (amend
Development Policy guidelines to include Urban Plat Street and Utility
Construction Time Table). Motion carried unanimously.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE:
August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
.)
Scott Erickson,~
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Order Feasibility ReporU96-19/Sunshine
Park Irrigation Well
13.
The City Council is requested to adopt a resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility
report for the improvement of an irrigation well for Project No. 96-19, in the area of Sunshine
Community Park Complex.
/
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF IRRIGATION WELL FOR PROJECT NO. 96-19 ,IN
THE AREA OF SUNSHINE COMMUNITY PARK COMPLEX .
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover is cognizant of the need
for improvements, specifically irrigation well in the following described area: _
Sunshine Community Park Complex.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council is cognizant of the need for improvements.
2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to the City Engineer
and he is instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August , 19_, with
/
Councilmembers
the resolution, and Councilmembers
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
voting in favor of
voting
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE: August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson~ l
Engineering'
ITEM NO.
Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Earthwork
\tf: Site Utilities
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of earthwork
and site utilities for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for
Project 94-30..
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF EARTHWORK & SITE
UTILITIES PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, A~
Engineering'
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Earthwork
and Site Utilities
t5,
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, earthwork and site utilities for City
Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
/
"
I
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
EARTHWORK & SITE UTILITIES .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for earthwork and site
utilities.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 , 19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE: August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott ~ricks.on, ~ ~
Engineering .
ITEM NO.
Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Landscaping
lto.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of
landscaping for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for
Project 94-30.
/
j
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF LANDSCAPING FOR
PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~ 1..
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Landscaping
''"1' ,
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, landscaping for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
J
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
/ COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Council member to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
LANDSCAPING .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for landscaping.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 , 19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
Council members
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE: August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~ ~
Engineering
ITEM NO.
o Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Concrete & Masonry
\0.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of concrete
and masonry for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for
Project 94-30.
J
. I
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF CONCRETE &
MASONRY FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF
FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and_
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Council member
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August, 19 96, with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
. /
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, J(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Concrete & Masonry
\q.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, concrete and masonry for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Council member
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
CONCRETE & MASONRY .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for concrete and
masonry.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 , 19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Council member and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ry\...
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Structural
Steel - Labor
61.0.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of structural
steel - labor for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for
Project 94-30.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Council member
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF STRUCTURAL STEEL -
LABOR FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF
FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Council member
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
l
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~ t
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Structural
I .~teel - Labor
1r:X1.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, structural steel - labor for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
STRUCTURAL STEEL-LABOR .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for structural steel -
labor.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
J
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 , 19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
Council members
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
j
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~~
Engineering'
ITEM NO.
Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Misc. Construction
O?~.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of
miscellaneous construction for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and
specifications for Project 94-30.
J
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS
CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING
PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96, with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Misc. Construction
lA.~.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, miscellaneous construction for City
Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
/
i
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for miscellaneous
construction.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 , 19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
,
,
DATE: August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
dtf,rder Plans & Specs/94-30/Roofing
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of roofing
for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for Project 94-30.
/
,
j
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Council member
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF ROOFING FOR
PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and_
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Council member
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, d{
Engineering
ITEM NO.
-:fl5.prove Plans & Specs/94-30/Roofing
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, roofing for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
/
J
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
"
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
ROOFING .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for roofing.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 ,19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
Council members
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE: August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, JIi..
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Aluminum
~indows & Entrances
(?( (0 ,
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of aluminum
windows and entrances for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and
specifications for Project 94-30.
/
I
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF ALUMINUM WINDOWS
& ENTRANCES FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION
OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
./
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Aluminum
;Z~~ows and Entrances
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, aluminum windows and entrances
for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
J
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
ALUMINUM WINDOWS & ENTRANCES .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for aluminum windows
and entrances.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 ,1996 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
Council members
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
/
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
\
J
DATE: August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~ (
Engineering
ITEM NO.
J:{der Plans & Specs/94-30/Skylights
&,.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of skylights
for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for Project 94-30.
/
. /
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF SKYLIGHTS FOR
PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as the project manager and_
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Council member
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96, with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
,
/
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
~rove Plans & Specs/94-30/Skylights
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, skylights for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
J COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
SKYLIGHTS .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96 , adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for skylights.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
,
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 ,19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
'\
DATE: August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Drywall Systems
30.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of drywall
systems for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for Project
94-30.
,
,
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF DRYWALL SYSTEMS
FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Council members
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
\ Victoria Volk - City Clerk
, /
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~~
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30IDrywall Systems
~I.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, drywall systems for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
I
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
DRYWALL SYSTEMS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for drywall systems.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 , 19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Council member and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
voting in
voting against, whereupon
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
" Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
;
DATE: August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, t<-
Engineering
ITEM NO.
~~er Plans & Specs/94-30/Flooring
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of flooring
for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for Project 94-30.
"
;
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF FLOORING FOR
PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councjlmember
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
\
/
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~C
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Flooring
33,
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, flooring for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
I COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
FLOORING .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for flooring.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 ,19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
City Council at a regular meeting this
Councilmembers
and adopted by the
20th day of August ,19 96 , with
voting in
voting against, whereupon
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
\ Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE: August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, rfl.L
Engineering ,
ITEM NO.
3q~der Plans & Specs/94-30/Ceiling Tile Systems
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of ceiling tile
systems for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for Project
94-30.
, /
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF CEILING TILE
SYSTEMS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF
FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Council members
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
.'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
,
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Ap2rove Plans & Specs/94-30/Ceiling Tile Systems
35.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, ceiling tile systems for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
, /
,
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
/
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
CEILING TILE SYSTEMS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for ceiling tile
systems.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 , 19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August . 19 96 , with
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
voting in
voting against, whereupon
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
\
/
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
,
)
DATE: August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~~
Engineering
ITEM NO.
9rder Plans & Specs/94-30/Painting
6(P.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of painting
for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for Project 94-30.
/
,
. J
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF PAINTING FOR
PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, J~
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Painting
1;1',
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, painting for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
;
,
\
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
PAINTING .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for painting.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 ,19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by CounciJmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
voting in
voting against, whereupon
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
\ Victoria Volk - City Clerk
j
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
I
DATE: August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, t <-
Engineering .
ITEM NO.
30rder Plans & Specs/94-30/Mechanical
~.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of
mechanical for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for
Project 94-30.
/
J
I
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF MECHANICAL FOR
PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
J
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~
Engineering
ITEM NO.
~prove Plans & Specs/94-30/Mechanical
$"-{.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, mechanical for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
. /
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
J COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
MECHANICAL .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for mechanical.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
/
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 , 19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,1996, with
Council members voting in
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
J
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, I L
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Order Plans & Specs/94-30/Electrical
~O,
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of electrical
for City Hall and directing the preparation of final plans and specifications for Project 94-30.
,
/
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF ELECTRICAL FOR
PROJECT NO. 94-30 AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS..
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 94-30 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby designate Adolfson & Peterson. Inc. as the project manager and _
LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer for this improvement and they are
directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Counci/member
and adopted by the
/
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
,
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
. /
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
\,
J
DATE:
August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM NO.
Approve Plans & Specs/94-30/Electrical
4l.
Scott Erickson, &l
Engineering
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications
and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 94-30, electrical for City Hall.
Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review.
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
j COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-30 , FOR
ELECTRICAL .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. -96, adopted by the City
Council on the 20th day of August, 19~, Adolfson & Peterson Inc. as
the project manager and LHB Engineers & Architects as the engineer have
prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-30 for electrical.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City
Council for their review on 20th day of August , 19~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications.
J
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 2:00 PM , September 17 ,19 96 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th day of August ,19 96 , with
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
voting in
voting against, whereupon
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE: August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott ~ricks.on,~~
Englneenng
ITEM NO.
Approve Quote/95-23/Removal of Service
Rjo_ad EntrancelWoodland Terrace
~)
.
The City Council is requested to approve the quote to Old is Gold Construction in the amount
of $3,300.00 for the removal of one service road entrance onto Bunker Lake Boulevard
adjacent to the Woodland Terrace development.
The entrance to be removed is directly across from Marigold Street NW and is the service road
entrance that was recommended for removal by the neighborhood committee previously set
up to evaluate the traffic concerns in this area. The removal of the service road was one of
the recommendations provided by the neighborhood committee.
The funding for this work would be from the PIR fund previously identified and used for the
traffic study in the area.
/
Quotes received are as follows:
Contractor
Old is Gold
Sauter & Sons
Amount
$3,300.00
$5,000.00
'.
i
AUG-14-96 WED 9:27
flu:i-1l9 96 laS: 22 FROM:
OLD IS GOLD CONSTRUCTION FAX NO. 612 434 6467
'75S-B923 TO:S12 434 6467
P.Ol
PAGE: B3
/
CITY OF ANCOVER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BID PROPOSAL
ProjeGt '* ~5~, Crooked Lake Boulevard
':;.:;.,....".;~,.....~;;:w.~~~. .. ...,... . ~-<<~~ln-........,
;;;;:;m!";'i;~~i~itni'. :-.} . '- ~l""::~~~~l~:srEE~~~:1~l;:"=
""'__J~.~.Oi:~....~~.:....~~._. ----------.". _ .. . _.... . .. ..' ...l<iIl.;.:j~ ~~,....__........:nt...~~_~
Bidder mLlst fill in unit prices In numertll~; make extension for each item and total the
bid. For comple1e information oonearning these items, see Specifjcation~.
1 Removel af Service Roael Lump Sum 1 13100 ~ $ '3~-ao @.
Entrance tIl1d Site - -
Re&loralion
2 $ S
3 $ $
<4 S S
S $ I
G S S
., S $
$ $
TOTAL J "33 00 0::0
Signature
t\iiJSGGLD TmrCymN
. . ' $COtT FQVI'
:. Maf,..,.AD.N.W.
AllMM:R.IIN 55304
434-9818
-'
D.~~)t
/
,-'5:-,... r::'::!?-3
Te): .:.12 HJ7'3'r
F'r:~I?iE: 03
/
CITY OF ANDOVER ENGINEEr~ING DEPARTMENT
BID PROPOSAL
Project # 95-4, Croolted Lake Boulevard
:....'.:.AU:R~ roQV~ nt,if$~6)~~~t;i@~. ail~t Sita rt(is.t.\ir611 qil "
Bidder must fill in unit prices in numerals; rntll~e extension for each item tllld total the
bid. For complete information concerning those items, see Srecifications
--------
__.___..-._ .__'__'___..___n .'._ .,__.,___. _,_,._. ...___u_m...___. __ __ _... ....._..._,,_.,. _ ___ ____.'__ _ '-_ ___.._u_ __,___
LINE"" ii~ .- .-'q
;.': .... "~?:':'q,,:::;'; ":\...~.'.:..,.....:,.;~.:,. :.'.1.':... D..:......As. ~. .,co'Tro...... :, ~N.)I;:T:.i.os..~!.}:i!, ;
jJi;M~qh . '" '"
. .,-. _ - - -~c;:",=\-d~-4:~-=.=~~
Removal of Service Road Lump SUln
Entrance and Site
Restoration
1
$
$ S DOO (', ()
- -----.J--=---------n ----..--
2
$
$
3
$
s
4
$ :1
5
$
$
6
$
-'"------------------- ._--------1
~,
- ---I
7
$ $
S j S
_.._._0,__________.._ ___ _,____..__ __.________.'__.._. n________u
"7-".~:::- _~~:.-=~::-_ ,,"-=:-":-~_,"",,",":':"':_::::==,","";_:_:-.",_:::"_:: ==...=.-~~='''''"_:::_:::,.,..,:-:: ..:,,~~:'.;.:;"""'~,.,- c,~~ _,",,-c-c""""'-::"""--=-="~""-=.. ::-:-:- -:-:,.,...,.c:-:---
TOTAL ,to s- OC~. -
"'"..... u..~u___.... -'_ ._.____
"
Total Amount -:; ~ _~~____~~ILt.:!2.,_____,"_~__.__u_o~cJ:'___
(Written in Words)
Stgna!",e d----4d----...... ..__ D"te s--I~j?~
,
.J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE August 20. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance ~~
Jean D. McGann
lITEM NO. Ll3.
Release Letter of Credit - Pinewood Estates 2nd Addition
REOUEST:
The Andover City Council is requested to approve the release of the letter of credit for the developers
improvements for Pinewood Estates 2nd Addition.
BACKGROUND:
/ On June 11, 1993 Continental Development Corporation submitted a letter of credit, #1154-693SA, in the
amount of $90,000.00 for the developer improvements of Pinewood Estates 2nd Addition. On January 2,
1996, the Andover City Council approved a reduction to this letter of credit leaving a balance of $49,082.58.
Since that time, the special assessments related to this letter of credit have been paid off and should be released.
Original Letter of Credit Previous Reduction
Reduction Requested
Balance
$90000.00 $40 917 42
$49.082.58
.$.QJlQ
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
J
DATE August 20.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance ~
Jean D. Mclf'ann
I ITEM NO. 11~.
MOWING FEES
Each year the City has to mow parcels ofIand that residents have not kept up. After the mowing is complete,
we send a bill to the resident whom owns the property. In 1996, the City entered into a contract with a
company to perform these mowing services. The City is still responsible for billing and collection for the
mowing services. Under the mowing contract we pay $105.00 per hour plus applicable sales tax for mowing
services rendered. Ifthe company we contracted with is not available to perform the mowing services, the City
is ultimately responsible to perform the service.
. I
In the past, the City charged fees for mowing based on the equipment utilized, manpower needed and
administrative fees. City staff is requesting a flat fee of $150.00 per hour for all mowing services provided
to residents. In the future, this fee would be included in the regular fee schedule approved by the City Council
each year.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 20,1996
AGENDA
N:>.
SECTION
Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
N:>.
City Clerk
46,
V. VOlkQ.6J)J
BY:
Authorize Sale/Lot 1, Block 1,
T T 'ip!' c; Pct",t<>c
The City Council is requested to authorize city staff to advertise for sale Lot 1,
Block 1, Hartfiel's Estates.
In 1984 the City purchased this lot which was tax forfeit at the time. It was
purchased for a nonspecific purpose at a cost of $100.00. The appraised value of
the property at this time is $27,300.00.
We have had several inquiries from people who would like to purchase the
property .
)
,
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
. 1
,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: August 20 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson'J :,
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Award Bid/94-30/City Hall Structural Steel
ICD.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting bids and awarding the
contract to American Structural Metals, Inc. in the amount of $33,905.00 for the improvement
of Project 94-30, City Hall, for structural steel.
The bids received are as follows:
American Structural Metals, Inc.
Thurnbeck Steel Fabricators, Inc.
K & K Fabrication, Inc.
D & M Iron Works, Inc.
Anderson Iron Works, Inc.
$33,905.00
$37,849.00
$39,820.00
$41,820.00
$46,552.00
Non-Responsive
Premier Construction Systems, Inc.
$38,995.00
$36,032.55
Construction Management Estimate
,
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 94-30 FOR
STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THE AREA OF CITY HALL.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council
Resolution No. 152-96 ,dated August 6 ,1996, bids were received,
opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows:
American Structural Metals, Inc.
Thurnbeck Steel Fabricators, Inc.
K & K Fabrication, Inc.
D & M Iron Works, Inc.
Anderson Iron Works, Inc.
Non-Responsive
Premier Construction Systems, Inc.
$33,905.00
$37,849.00
$39,820.00
$41,820.00
$46,552.00
Construction Management Estimate
$38,995.00
$36,032.55
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate American Structural
Metals Inc. as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with American Structural Metals Inc. in the amount
of $33 905.00 for construction of the improvements; and direct the City
Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
City Council at a regular meeting this 20th
Councilmembers
the resolution, and Councilmembers
and adopted by the
day of August ,19Jill...., with
voting in favor of
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
ADOLF SON PETERSON
FAX NO. 16125252340
P. 02
CONsrRUCTlON
MANAGERS
6701 West 23rd Street. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 . (612) 544-1561 . FAX (612) 525-2333
August 19, 1996
ANDOVER CITY HALL
Bid Package #1 Resuhs
Bid Package #1 is to supply all of the structural steel, bar joists am decking.
Eight suppliers (8) were contacted with five (5) submitting responsive bids and one (1) a non-
responsive bid.
The bid package estimate for this package is $36,032.55.
Resuhs are as fullows:
Arnerk.an Structural Metals, Inc.
Thumbeck Steel Fabricators, Inc.
K & K Fabrication, Inc.
n & M Iron Works, Inc.
Anderson Iron Works, Inc.
BASE BID
$33,805.00
$37,999.00
$39,950.00
$41,776.00
$46,301.00
SKYUGHT FRAMING TOTAL
$100.00 $33,905.00
($150.00) $37,849.00
($130.00) $39,820.00
-0:- $41,820.00
$251.00 $46,552.00
Non-Responme (not on bid form)
Premier Construction Systems, Inc. $38,995.00
It is the recommendation of Adolfmn & Peterson. Inc. that the bid of American Str1.1CtuJ:al
Metals. Inc. to include the skylight framing be accepted. The total bid package is in the
amount of$33,90S.00.
~~ ~ ~ ~
Member of CoMtrvc6an M_~._& __Qoi~ of AmDriw. \J i.ViAA
DATE
August 20. 1996
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
City Council Minutes - August 5 1996
Economic Development Authority Minutes - August 6. 1996
Special City Council Minutes - August 7. 1996
Letter from Carol Cooper - July 22. 1996
Letter from Metropolitan Council - July 26. 1996
Letter from NORAM - August 12. 1996
Letter from Anoka County - August 13 1996
Schedule of Bills
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON
THE NEXT AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
Michael and Carol Cooper
1690 - 146th Avenue NW
Andover MN 55304
612-754-1986
July 22, 1996
City of Andover
I am writing this letter to extend our sincere thanks
for the beautiful fireworks display this past weekend.
We, along with neighbors and friends, watched the fireworks
display right from our backyards. What a view! It made us
proud to say that we were from Andover.
Weare already talking about and looking forward to the display
next year!
Sincerely,
Qfu~C6 ~
Carol J. Cooper
Andover Resident
c. ~. f't't-:r ~d-(jl [Cfer C.
RECEIVED
JUL 2 4 1996
CITY OF ANDOVER
~ Metropolitan Council
~ Working for the Region. Planning for the Future
c.~. MT"J A-\J,.~ ;'lo,/'1'7<"
RE( ~'<EO
JUL 3 - i996
CITY OF ....;.'ER
July 26, 1996
Richard Fursman
City Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Fursman:
Thank you for your thoughtful comments regarding the Metropolitan Council's report, Growth
Options for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Your ideas and those of other Council "partners"
will be considered as we work together to determine a preferred development pattern for the
Twin Cities Area. We appreciate your participation in this important dialogue.
Your name has been placed on our Growth Options mailing list so that we can keep you informed
as the selection process proceeds. We urge you to continue to take part in shaping our region's
future.
i:;JeIY'
u,"V
Curt Johnson
Chair
~~_. i.
~ \ \ (\
.' ~\'v"~O''-' ~.
James 1. Solem
\
R~gional A~istrator
~~
230 EastFlflh Street St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TIY 291-0904 Metro Info Une 229-3780
An Equal Oppommity Employer
~!!~AIVI
ENERGY CORP.
~ (' I .
1\ v' 1 v
~ n-
~ ~ } u
.
T. Milton Honea
Chairman of the Board. President and
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 1996
Dear Public Official,
Permit me to apologize for this informal communique, but I felt, in this case, immediacy
was more important than style.
I wanted to advise you that NorAm Energy Corp., which serves your area through one
of our subsidiary companies, has received a proposal from Houston Industries
Incorporated to acquire the stock of NorAm and merge our companies. Our Board of
Directors has evaluated this proposal and unanimously voted to accept the offer and
submit it to NorAm stockholders for approval. This was announced on Monday,
August 12.
Although I don't anticipate this consolidation of companies will affect, in any way, the
service we are privileged to provide your community, I wanted you to have the details
of this proposed merger. I have taken the liberty to enclose with this letter a copy of the
press release announcing this event. I have also included fact sheets and other data for
your information.
The focal gas distribution companies, which are NorAm subsidiaries, will retain their
separate identities and organizations. This combination offers excellent potential for
enhancing customer service and for providing a wide range of new value-added
service.
The information I have included provides significant details on all aspects of this
proposed consolidation. If you would like additional information, please contact our
local representative. We will keep you informed of significant events as we proceed.
Cordially,
/J;;u ~P-
encl.
1600 SMITH STREET . P.O. BOX 2628 . HOUSTON, TEXAS 77252-2628 . PHONE 713/654-5931
News Release
Contacts:
Houston Industries Inc.
Dan Bulla (investors), 713-207-3120
Sandy Frohman (media), 713-207-3123
NorAm Energy
Randy Burkhalter (investors), 713-654-7502
Ellen Orsburn (media), 713-654-5930
.,
For release:
August 12, 1996
Houston Industries Incorporated Announces
Agreement to Acquire NorAm Energy Corp.
Houston, August 12-Houston Industries Incorporated (NYSE: HOU) and NorAm
Energy Corp. (NYSE: NAE) today announced that they have signed a definitive
agreement for Houston Industries to acquire NorAm Energy in a transaction valued at
$3.8 billion (consisting of $1.4 billion of debt and preferred stock assumed by Houston
Industries and $2.4 billion for common stock). The combined enterprise will have a
total market capitalization of approximately $14.3 billion.
Under the terms of the agreement, which has been approved by the boards of directors
of both Houston Industries and NorAm Energy, Houston Industries will pay $16.00
for each NorAm common share outstanding, 50% of which will be paid in cash and
50% in Houston Industries common stock. After closing, four NorAm Board members
will join the Houston Industries Board of Directors. The acquisition is subject to
shareholder approval of both companies and various regulatory approvals.
The proposed transaction combines NorAm Energy, the nation's third largest natural
gas utility serving 2.7 million customers in six states, with Houston Industries, a
holding company involved in the electric utility and unregulated energy businesses in
the United States and in foreign markets. The corporate offices will remain in
Houston, where both companies are currently headquartered, and Don Jordan will
continue as Chairman and CEO of Houston Industries.
Houston Industries' regulated subsidiary, Houston Lighting & Power Company, is the
nation's ninth-largest electric utility in terms of kilowatt-hour sales. Its service
territory includes the City of Houston and surrounding communities with a total of
1.5 million customers. HI Energy, Houston Industries' principal unregulated
subsidiary, pursues foreign utility privatizations and the development of unregulated
power generation projects, primarily in foreign markets. It has projects and interests
in Argentina, Brazil, and India.
1
NorAm brings a growing, well-respected wholesale gas and electricity trading
business, significant mid-stream gas assets in the form of interstate pipelines,
gathering, and storage, and the nation's third largest gas distribution operation. One
of its distribution divisions, Entex, serves metropolitan Houston, in addition to
communities in Louisiana and Mississippi, and has approximately 600,000 customers
in common with HL&P. NorAm also has a leading position in retail energy services
and an emerging presence in Mexico and Latin America.
The acquisition of NorAm Energy positions Houston Industries to be a national
wholesale and retail energy services leader with extensive gas and electric capabilities.
The combined entity will be well-equipped to meet the evolving needs of customers,
offering innovative products and efficient service throughout a broad region of the
country.
"Market and regulatory forces are changing the industry landscape to a more
competitive environment. In addition, the electricity and natural gas markets are
converging, and customers are demanding additional products and services. This
acquisition will substantially strengthen Houston Industries' strategic position given
these rapid changes in the industry," said Don Jordan.
"We see several strategic benefits to this acquisition," continued Jordan. "First, it
combines Houston Industries' electric market knowledge with NorAm Energy's
wholesale gas and electricity trading operations and skills, which will help propel the
combined company forward in the converging wholesale energy markets. Second, it
positions the combined company to provide the bundled gas and electric products and
services customers are increasingly demanding. Third, it helps establish Houston
Industries' broad national energy presence and offers the opportunity for improved
efficiency across all of our operations. Fourth, it gives us access to 3.6 million
customers, 2.1 million more than we had previously."
Jordan added, "This combination presents exciting new opportunities for our
employees as we enter the natural gas distribution and transmission businesses for the
first time, expand into wholesale gas and electric marketing, and extend our
international position."
Milt Honea, Chairman, President, and CEO of NorAm Energy said, "This transaction
is a natural fit that will benefit our shareholders, customers, and employees. Our
companies have a shared vision, common geographical areas, and complementary
skills and assets. Our shareholders benefit from the value created by the combination-
the increased access to Houston Industries' experience and skills in the electric power
industry, Houston Industries' financial strength, and our complementary international
development interests. Our customers benefit from the combined company's
enhanced ability to offer a broad array of products and services, particularly in
electricity. Finally, the combination will provide greater opportunities for our
employees as the combined company continues to expand its wholesale, retail, and
international presence."
2
"The combination of HL&P and Entex under one owner offers excellent potential for
enhancing local customer service and for providing a wide range of new value-added
services," Jordan said. "At the same time, we intend to continue the efforts already
underway to increase the opportunity to move gas from west to east across the Mid-
Continent region where NorAm Gas Transmission and Mississippi River Transmission
are strategically located."
"Houston Industries plans to expand many of the retail services offered by NorAm
Energy throughout its gas and electric distribution operations. NorAm has been a
leader in developing new value-added services for residential and small business
customers such as appliance repair and preventive maintenance contracts and home
security system sales and monitoring, as well as services for other utilities and retail
marketers. "
In addition to serving more than 2.7 million households in six states through its Entex,
Arkla/ and Minnegasco gas distribution divisions, NorAm Energy is a major natural
gas pipeline and energy marketer, providing supply, gathering, storage, and
transportation of natural gas and wholesale electric services through its NorAm
Trading and Transportation Group (NTTG). NTTG includes NorAm Energy Services
group (NES), a leading natural gas and electric wholesale trader. In the first six
months of 1996, NES traded over 2.5 Bd per day of natural gas and almost 450
thousand MWh of electricity. NITG's interstate pipeline system consists of NorAm
Gas Transmission and Mississippi River Transmission. In addition, NTTG operates
gathering assets in Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Texas through NorAm Field
Services. NorAm Energy Management provides unregulated retail energy services to
industrial and large commercial customers. Through NorAm Energy's wide-ranging
gas activities, it handles over 5 Bd per day of natural gas. In addition to its corporate
office in Houston, NorAm Energy has offices in Shreveport, Louisiana; Little Rock,
Arkansas; Boulder, Colorado; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Minneapolis, Minnesota; St. Louis,
Missouri; Williamsburg, Virginia; Midland, Michigan; and Miami, Florida.
Subject to the approval process, the transaction is expected to be completed by the end
of the first quarter of 1997.
3
Selected Financial Data
Year-end 1995
Houston Industries NorAm Energy
Revenues 3,730 2,965
($ Millions)
Net income from 397 66
continuing operations
($ Millions)
Total assets 11,820 3,666
($ Millions)
Earnings per share from 1.60 0.47
continuing operations
(Dollars)
Dividends per share 1.50 0.28
(Dollars)
Average shares 248.3 123.9
outstanding (Millions)
###
NorAm Energy Corp.
Factsheet
1995
NorAm Energy Corp. (NYSE: NAE), is the nation's third largest natural
gas utility serving over 2.7 million customers through its Entex, Arkla and Minnegasco
distribution divisions. It is also the largest in the United States in number of
communities served with a total of 1,300.
NorAm's two interstate pipelines. NorAm Gas Transmission (NGT) and Mississippi
River Transmission (MRT), together form one of the nation's largest pipeline
networks with approximately 8,600 miles of pipeline moving natural gas from the vast
mid-continent supply regions to on-system markets and to pipelines serving the densely
populated Northeast and midwest markets.
NorAm Field Services (NFS) operates approximately 3,500 miles of gathering
pipelines moving in excess of 200 billion cubic feet (Bct) of natural gas per year. These
lines are connected to over 3,900 wells and reserves of 36 trillion cubic feet of gas in
major producing fields in Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Texas.
NorAm Energy Services (NES) provides wholesale energy marketing services
including the non-regulated rebundling of gas supply, storage, transportation and other
services, as well as electric power marketing.
NorAm Energy Management (NEM) is the company's retail energy supplier,
providing total energy portfolios to industrial and large commercial consumers. This
retail marketing effort generated 169.7 Bcf of gas sales in 1995. This group also
provides other energy services such as performance contracting, risk and energy
management as well as services targeted to the residential consumers.
Selected Financial Data
{millions of dollars I
Annual Revenues
Operating Income
Earnings-Continuing Operations
Total Assets
(per share datal
Earnings
Dividends
Stock Price:
High
Low
Close
Ave. Common Shares Outstanding
Employees
.l22i
$2,964.7
287.3
65.5
3,666.0
$ 0.47
0.28
9
51/8
8 7/8
123.9 million
6,600
l224
$2,857.9
264.9
51.3
3,561.5
$ 0.33
0.28
9
5 1/4
5 3/8
122.4 million
HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
FACT SHEET
(Year-end 1995)
Houston Industries Incorporated (HI) is a holding company with $11.8 billion in assets and
annual revenues of$3.7 billion. ill is involved in the electric utility and unregulated power businesses
in the U.S. and in foreign markets. Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P), a regulated
electric utility, is ill's oldest and largest subsidiary. ill's business strategy is to remain in the energy
and energy seIVices industries and to pursue opportunities with the potential for greater growth and
risk-adjusted returns than could be achieved in the regulated utility industry alone.
Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P) is the nation's ninth-largest electric utility
in terms of sales which, in 1995, exceeded 61 billion kilowatt-hours. HL&P serves more than 1.5
million customers in a 5,000 square-mile area along the Texas Gulf Coast that has a population
exceeding 3.7 million. Firm peak demand in 1995 was 11,419 megawatts.
Houston Industries Energy, Inc. (HI Energy) pursues foreign utility privatizations and the
development of unregulated power generation projects. HI Energy has operations in the U.S.,
Argentina and Brazil, and projects under construction in Argentina and India.
Selected Financial Data
($ Millions)
Revenues:
1995
1994
HI Consolidated
HL&P
$ 3,730.2
3,680.3
$ 3,754.1
3,746.1
Income from Continuing Operations:
HI Consolidated
HL&P
397.4
451.0
424.0
453.2
Total Assets:
11,819.6
11,403.1
'.....~
'<Ge()gr~Phic locations of combined businesses)1.~~l
of NorAri1 J;nergy .Corp.and Houston Industries Incorporated?fi:;j
. -' .' ,,~-'I' -, 'co"~ '"" , . ." . _,_ '7-!:,~1
" '.. . . .;'.(::}:,:~!~(Not shown are additional operations in South America.) >".y;:;.~
. .. - -' .~-:" .:~,_i"'_"......~._...;_ "'P"':":':::';
NorAm Divisions
. Minnegasco
... Arkla
. Entex
NGT
MRT
Houston Lighting
& Power Subsidiary
of Houston Industries
Incorporated Area
of Service.
<-..'..." -~
_f:1,
:'~1f~1
. -.~.~,J
~ ~:';;~r~
:;~~j
':":~'Iyr::}
;:;.:'~,"~,' '.1
. -- -.-'",,"~' , ,
.,11
.-.~,
,<;~<j~~~~~
,:r0~i'"' .
. -,'~';"
'-,'''''''''',
.':::?~~i
. r-.....,.,,_~
~' :,'>f:~:j
:;qE2-
.. r; _~;;.;'~~~. ~
":,:~'..::"!"
.".;~..:;.~
- ~<::.::.t~,,~
~, , --- ~- ,..,:.,>--->
. '>',~-~~~~~JJ
ji}~
. .~ ~ - .
Mmnegasco.
A HoP..AM H'ERGY COMPANY
Minnesota Contacts For NorAm Energy Corp.
Al Swintek
800 LaSalle Avenue, Fl. 11
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612/321-4799
Arne Hendrickson
800 LaSalle Avenue, Fl. 11
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612/321-5375
Roger Schoeb
2400 North Riverfront Drive
Mankato, MN 56001
1-800-245-2377
ROO LaSallt' Awnup, F1 11
PO. Box ,,!IO;lR
~1iI\lH'ap(llis. :\I~ ;j;}-l;)f)-f1();~q
, \
.
COUNTY OF ANOKA
!I
110 (:/;
)1 -/
Q / iJ
v v
DIVISION OF PROPERTY RECORQS AND TAXATION
~
Edward M. Treslaz, Division Manager
GOVERNMENT CENTER. 2100 3RD AVENUE. ANOKA, MN 55303
August 13, 1995
City of Andover
Attn: City!fown Clerk
1685 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear City!fown Clerk:
Enclosed for your information and file are copies of Resolutions #96-108 and 96-109 passed by
the Anoka County Board of Commissioners at its meeting held July 23, 1996. These resolutions
provide authority under Chapter 282 of Minnesota Statutes for a public sale of lands situated in
Anoka County which have forfeited to the State of Minnesota for nonpayment of taxes, and
under Chapter 282.08 and 282.09 for authorization for charging of costs of Tax Forfeited Land
Sale to proceeds from said sale and authorization of 20% proceed distribution of 1996 Public
Land Sale to Park fund.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Sharon at 323-5443.
Very truly yours,
~lI!~
Edward M. Treska
Division Manager, Property Records and Taxation
EMT/pjl
pubsale.cities
Enclosure(s)
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Anoka' County, Minnesota
DATE: JULY 23, 199&
OFFERED BY COMMISSIONER: Berg
RESOLUTION 1Q6-1OG
AUTHCRIZATlON FOR CHARGING OF COSTS OF TAX-FORFElTED
LAND SALE TO PROCEEDS FROM SAID SALE;
AUTHORIZATION OF 20'J(. PROCEED DISTRIBUTION OF
111116 PUBLIC LAND SALE TO PARK FUND
WHEREAS, In Resolution 1196-1 08 !he Anoka County Board of Commissioners has authorized
!he sale d certain tax-forfeited property by the Division Manager of Property Records and Taxation;
and,
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 282.09, provides that the Division Manager of
Property Recorda and Taxation shall place all monies received from a tax-forfeit land sale in a fund
to be known .. the forfeited tax sale fund. and all disbursements and costs of such sale shall be
charged against said fund when provided for by !he county board of commissioners; and,
WHEREAS, It Ia the desire of the Anoka County Board d Commissioners to availltself of !he
auIhorily contained In MInnesota StalJJtes, SedIon 282.08 (3) (b), wherein !he county board may set
uide 2O'lEo d !he bal~ d land sale receipts for park purposes:
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by !he Anoka County Board of Commissioners that
In 8CCOrdance wi1h Chapter 282.09 d Minnesota S1atutes, !he Division Manager d Property Records
and Taxation is hereby authorized to charge all appropriate expenses of the tax-forfeit public land
sale to the forfeited tax sale fund and, further, that said expense amounts shall be paid from !he
forfeited tax .... fund and credited to the DIvision Manager d Property Records and Taxation's
General Acalunl
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 0Ivlsi0n Manager of Property Records and Taxation
shall. after dI.vlbutIng the appropriate amount of !he public land sale receipts. pursuant to Minnesota
Stalutes 282.08, subda. 1, 2 and 3 (a). if applicable, set aside 2O'lEo of the balance of said receipts
foI' use by the county in the maintenance and acquisition of county parks, all pursuant to Minnesota
StalJJtee 282.08 (3) (b) and stalJJtes cited therein.
BE IT ANALL Y RESOl. VED that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Division
Manager d Prop<<ty Recorda and Taxation. County Land Commissioner. the Minnesota Department
d Revenue and all affected ll'IUI'Kipalitles and town boards.
YES NO
Olstrict '1 - Borg X Berg
Olstrict 12 - lang X Lang
Olatrict 13 - I..angfeId X L.angfeid
Olatrict '4 '. K.ordiM X Kordiak
Olatrict /15 - McCauley X McCauley
Olatrict 116 . McCarron X McCarron
Olatrict '7 - Erhart X Erhart
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
I, JoIYI . Jay" Mcunden. County Administrator. Anoka County. Minnesota, hereby certify that
I tvlve compared the foregoing cof1l of !he resolution of the County Board of said County with !he
~ record thereof on file in the Admlnis1ralion Office, Anoka County, Minnesota, as stated in the
mnutea d the procee:lings of said Board at a meeting duly held on July 23. 1996. and that the same
la a t'Ue and oorrect copy d said original record and of the whole thereof, and that said resolution
wu dlJy paased by said Board at said meeting.
WItn8aa my hand and seal this 23rt1 day of July 1996.
J;6~D'!!~~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
. ,
RESOLUTlON ,.101
Page 3
YES NO
0Iatrlct .1 . Berg X Berg
0Iatrlct 112 . Lang X _ Lang
Olatrict .3 . L.angfeld X L..angfeld
0latrIct 1#4 - KordIak X Kordlak
Dlatrict 1#5 - McCauley X McCauley
Diatrict 1#6 . McCarron X McCarron
DIstrict 1#7 . Erhart X Erhart
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA ) SS
I. ,lc>hn ':Jay" McLInden. County Administrator, Anoka County, Minnesota. hereby certify that
I haY. compared the foregoing copy of the resolution of the County Board of said County with the
original record thereof on file in the Admlnlstratlon Office, Anoka County, Minnesota, as stated in the
minutllll of the proceedlngs of said Board at a meeting duly held on July 23, 1996. and that the same
la c true and correct copy of said original record and of the whole thereof. and that said resolution
was duly passed by said Board at said meeting.
WItnesa my hand and seal this 23rd day of July 1996.
~t!;L ~
OJA NOE
COUNTY MINISTRATOR
Co
. ,
PUBUC LAND SALE LIST
1996
EXHIBIT G PLATTED
SUBDIVISION
SEC. OR TWP. OR
LOT BLOCK RANGE
APPRAISED
VALUE OF
LAND
CITY OF ANDOVER
COm-ACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
NORDEEN ADO
1 P. 24 32 24 21 0042
KEY 575112
LOT 7 BLK 6 NORDEEN ADO, SUBJ 7
TO EASE OF REC
17,900
6
CITY OF BLAlNE
COm-ACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
ROSELAND IND PARK
2P. 1731 23430006
KEY 997737
LOT 1 BLK 2 ROSELAND
INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBJ TO
EASE OF REC
25.000
2
3P. 1731 23430007
KEY 99n48
LOT 2 BLK 2 ROSELAND
INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBJ TO
EASE OF REC
2
25,000
2
4P. 1731 2343 0013
KEY 99n82
LOT 8 BLK 2 ROSELAND
INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBJ TO
EASE OF REC
8
28,600
2
CITY OF CIRCLE PINES
COm-ACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
GOLDEN OAKS
5P. 2531 23420157
KEY 1242952
LOTS 29 THRU 32 INCL BLK 4 29
GOLDEN OAKS, SUBJ TO EASE OF
REC
27,000
4
~
RESOUJT1ON fg6..108
Page 2
BE rr FURTHER RESOLVED that all parcels which were approved for sale by ResolutJon 95-
B9 dated May 8,1995, which have not been sold. are withdrawn from sale.
BE rr FURTHER RESOLVED that the Division Manager of Property Rec;ords and Taxation
shall publWllhe 1egaI descriptions of the parcels and their appraised values in accordance with t
282.02 of the Minnesota Statutes.
BE rr FURTHER RESOLVED that the sale shall be made fOl" payment in lull or upon the
following terrna: That sales amounts of $500 01" less shall be paid in cash at the time of sale and all
cAher sales amounts may be paid In cash or paid on an installment basis according to the terms
provided herein. On sale amounts aver $500 but not aver $2000. a downpayment of $500 shall be
paid at the time of the sale, and the unpaid balance shall be paid in three equal amuallnstallments.
FOI" sale amounta In exceM at $2000. but not aver $40,000, a downpayment of one-fourth of the sale
price shall be paid at the time at sale. and the unpaid balance shall be paid In three equal amual
irwtallmenta. On sale amounts in excess of $40,000. a downpayment of one-fifth of the sale price
shall be paid at the time of sale. and the unpaid balance shall be paid In four equal amual
inatallments. FOI" all sales, the annual installments of the unpaid balance shall be paid prior to
October 31 NCh yetir. The lrlpaid balance on all sales shall accrue interest at the rate prescribed
by SectIon 279.03, subd. 1 A. and is subject to change each year on the unpaid balance; that no
principal Installment payment shall be less than the amount of the original down payment unless it is
a llnal payment on the contract. Each Installment payment shall include the amount of =ed
intenl8t to date. It./. the time of sale of a parcel of tax-forfeited land, the Division Manager of Property
RecordI and Taxation shall coiled In luU an amount equal to 3 per cent of the total sales price of the
land, said aum to be deposited with the State Treasurer In the real estate assurance account,
pursuant to Mlmesota Statutes 284.28. sub<!. 8; an amount equal to the State Deed Tax and the cost
at obtaining the Deed and rec:ording the same. which amounts are in addition to the total sale price
at the land. That all property remains subject: to arry existing leases; to easements obtained by
governmental subdivisions 01" agencies thereof fOl" any public purposes; to res1rictlons appearing of
record; to all existing laws and ordinances; and to the condition that the total appraised value does
not represent a basis fa( future taxes; and that amounts of special assessments canceled because
of forfeiture may be subject to reassessment
BE rr FURTHER RESOLVED that in accordance with Minn. Stat. t 282.01, subd. 7. that any
person who could have repurchased a parcel of property under Minn. Stat S 282.012 or Minn. Stat.
t 282.241 sIwIl not be allowed to purchase that same parcel of property at the sale for a purchase
price leu than !he sun at all deUnquent taxes and assessments computed under Minn. Stat S
282.251, togelher with penalties. interest, and costs accrued 01" would have accrued if the parcel had
not forfeitllcl1D the state.
BE rr FURTHER RESOLVED that the sale authorized by this resolutJon shall be conducted
.. a sealed bid sale. .. provided fa( In 1994 Laws of Minn.~ Chapter 413, which bids shall be
~ed by !he Anoka County Division of Property Records and Taxation until 4:30 p.m. on
September 26, 1996. which bids will then be publicly opened on September 27. 1996, at 9:00 a.m.,
at the Anoka County Gavernment Center In !he county board room. My remaining parcels not sold
by sealed bid shall be sold to anyone offering to pay the appraisal value thereof.
BE rr ANALl. Y RESOLVED that the Anoka County Board of Commissioners reserves its right,
l.I1der Mim. Stat. t 282.01, subd. 7, to withdraw from sale arry or all parcels listed in Exhibits G and
K (Platted) and H and J (Unplatted).
'.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Anoka County, Minnesota
DATE: JULY 23, lags
OFFERED BY CO....ISSIONER: Berg
RESOLUTION 186-108
AUTHORIZING A PUBUC SALE OF TAX-FORFEITED lAND
IN ACCORDANCE WITH "INN. STAT. 282 AND 111lJ4 LAWS OF MINN., CHAPTER 413
AND SETTING THE TERMS OF THE SALE
WHEREAS, certain landa have forfeited to the State of Minnesota, pursuant to Minn. Stat 5
282, which landa are described in Appraisal Ust 87 Exhibit A, Appraisal Ust as B Exhibit E, AppraisaJ
list 88 C Exhibit F, C~ Ust 89 Exhibit A, Classification Ust 90 Exhibit A, Classification Ust
91 ExhIbit A, Oaasiftcation Ust 92 Exhibits A, B and H. Classification Ust 93 Exhibits B and C.
Cluai1Icatlon list 94 Exhibits A, B, C, Classification Ust 95 Exhibits A and B, and Classification Ust
96 Exhibits A and B; and.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Anoka County has classified those parcels
on AppraiaaJ list 87 Exhibit A, by Resolution 87-54, Appraisal Ust ll8-B ExhIbit E, by Resolution ll8-
56, AppralaaJ Uat 88-C Exhibit F by Resolution 88-75, Classification Ust 89 Exhibit A by Resolution
89-13, CIasaitlcaUon Ust 90 by Resolution 90-15, Classification Ust 91 by Resolution 91-16,
Classification list 92 by Resolution 92-33, Classification Ust 93 by Resolution 92-142, Classification
list 94 by ~Ition 93-146, Cla.ssificatjon Ust 95 by Resolution 94-210, and Classification Ust 96
by ReaoIutIon 96-150, as non-conservation, and approved them for sale subject to review by the town .
boards and governing bodies of municipalities in Anoka County under Minn. Stat. 5 282; and.
WHEREAS, the claasiflcation and sale of any tax-forfeited lands lying within the bounds of any
organized town or Incorporated municipality with a taxable value in excess of $20,000 has been
approved by the Town Board of such town or governing body of such municipality, insofar as the
lands located therein;are concerned; and.
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners has determined that it is advisable
to sell said 1aIQ; and,
WHEREAS. aU parcels which were approved for sale by Resolution 95-89 dated May 8, 1995,
which have not been sold, shouk:t be withdrawn from sale; and,
WHEREAS. the Anoka County Board of Commissioners has taken certain parcels from
AppraiaaJ list 87 Exhibit A, Appraisal Ust 88.B Exhibit E, Appraisal Ust 88-C Exhibit F, Classification
list 89 Exhibit A, Olissitlc:ation Ust 90 Exhibit A, Classification Ust 91 Exhibit A, Classification Ust
92 Exhibits A, B and H. Classification Ust 93 ExhIbits B and C, Classification Ust 94 Exhibits A, B
and C, CIuaifIcatlon list 96 Exhibits A and B and Classification Ust 96 Exhibits A lII'ld B and
designated them Exhiblts G and K (Platted) and Hand J (Unplatted), which are attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as part of this resolution for public sale purposes; and,
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners has, in accordance with Minn: Stat.
5 282.01, subd. 3, appraised the lands and set the appraised values shown jn Exhibits G and K
(P1atted) and H and J (Unplatted); and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Minn. Stat. 5 282.01, subd. 7, any person who could have
repurchased. parcel of property under Minn. Stat. 5282.012 or Minn. Stat. 5 282.241 shall not be
allowed to purchase that same parcel of property at the sale for a purchase price Jess than the sum
of 1111 clellnquent taxM and assessments computed under Minn. Stat. 5 282.251, together with
~, interest, and costs accrued or would have accrued if the parcel had not forfeited to the
state; and,
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners shall provide the Division Manager
01 Property Records and Taxation with . list of parcels of land to be offered for sale under 5 282.02
of the MinnMota Statutes, and said list shall contain a desaiption of the parcels of land and the
appraiMd value thereof; and,
..
WHEREAS, in accordance with 1994 Laws of Minn., Chapter 413. Anoka County may conduct
a Haled bid sale u an alternate method of disposing of tax forfeited land:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anoka County Board of Commissioners
hereby submits . list of tax-forfeit parcels, known as Exhibits G and K (Platted) and H and J
(Unplatted) (attached), and that the Division Manager of Property Records and Taxation is hereby
directed to offer each parcel at public sale to the highest bidder, but not for less than the appraised
value.
. ,
SUBDIVISION
SEC. OR
LOT
T1Nf!. OR
BLOCK RANGE
APPRAISED
VALUE OF
LAND
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
CONTACT THE MUNICIPALITY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ANNEX
6P. 35 30 24140092
KEY 257340
LOT 2 & S 11 FT OF LOT 1
BLK 38 COL HTS ANNEX TO
MPLS SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
14,000
38
7P. 35 30 24 31 0021
KEY 260087 . 21 ,000
LOTS 16 & 17 BLK 51 COL HGTS16 51
ANNEX. SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
NOTES: BUYER WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH CITY ORDER TO TEAR DOWN
BUILDING ON PREMISES. AREA ZONED COMMERCIAL
CITY OF COON RAPIDS
CONTACT THE MUNICIPALITY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
CARLA DE ADD
8P. 23 31 24140005
KEY 857335
LOT 1 BLK 3 CARLA DE ADD
SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
DEER PARK
152,000
1
3
9P. 11 31 2434 0054
KEY 1007582
LOT 4 BLK 1
DEER PARK
SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
20,000
4
lOP. 11312434 0062
KEY 1007662
LOT 12 BLK 1
DEER PARK
SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
DUNNS VALLEY
llP. 26312443 0063
KEY 971737
THAT PRT OF LOT 1, DUNNS'
VAllE( LYG E OF THE ELINE
OF SCOTTS ADDITION. S OF
THE S LINE OF CREEK VICW
ADOITION & WL Y OF THE FOL
DESC LINE. BEG AT A PT ON
THE S LINE OF SO ABOVE DESC
TRACT, SO PT BEING 140 FT E
OF THE SW COR THEREOF, TH
NELYTO A PT205 FT E &
195 FT S OF THE WI COR OF
20,000
12
35,000
..
. , .
APPRAISED
SEC. OR TWP. OR VALUE OF
SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK RANGE LAND
SO TRACT, TH NEL Y TO A PT
290 FT E & 75 FT S OF THE
NW COR OF SO TRACT, TH NWL Y
TO A PT ON THE N UNE OF SO
TRACT 260 FT E OF THE NW
COR THEREOF & THERE TERM
EX RDS SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
LOFT HOMES ADD
12P. 1431 2421 0013
KEY 908076 19,500
LOT 1 BLK 2 LOFT HOMES 2
ADDITION SUBJ TO EASE OF
REC
NOTES: MAY BE SUBJECT TO REASSESSMENT.
SHERBROOK
13P. 11 31 243.2 0006
KEY 421314 21.300
LOT 6 BLK 1 SHERBROOK, SUBJ TO 6
EASE OF REC
14P. 11 31 243.20007
KEY 421323 21,300
LOT 7 BLK 1 SHERBROOK, SUBJ TO 7
EASE OF REC
15P. 11 31 24 3.2 0014
KEY 421396 21,300
LOT 7 BLK 2 SHERBROOK, SUBJ TO 7 2
EASE OF REC
CITY OF EAST BETHEL
CONTACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
EAST BETHEL COUNTRYSIDE EST
16P. 2833 23 23 0014
KEY 86695 10,500
LOT 2 BLK 1 EAST BETHEL 2 1
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES, SUBJ TO
EASE OF REC
HIDDEN HAVEN 3RD ADD
17P. 1833 23 44 0010
KEY 89031 37,500
LOT 2 BLK 10 HIDDEN HAVEN 3RD 2 10
ADD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
NORSELAND MANOR
18P. 303323240005
KEY 1068793 11.000
LOT 17 BLK 4 NORSElAND 17 4
MANOR SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
0
.
SUBDMSION
SEC. OR
LOT
TWP. OR
BLOCK RANGE
APPRAISED
VALUE OF
LAND
CITY OF FRIDLEY
CONTACT THE MUNICIPALITY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
INNSBRUCK VILLAGES 2ND ADD
20P. 24302441 0251
KEY 498447 11,000
LOT 1 BLK 5 INNSBRUCK VILLAGES 5
2ND ADD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
NOTES: CONDOMINIUM LOT
21P. 24302441 0252
KEY 498456 11,200
LOT 2 BLK 5 INNSBRUCK VILlAGES 2 5
2ND ADD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
NOTES: CONDOMINIUM LOT
22P. 24302441 0253
KEY 498465 11,000
LOT 3 BLK 5 INNSBRUCK VILLAGES 3 5
2ND ADD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
NOTES: CONDOMINIUM LOT
23P. 24302441 0254
KEY 498474 11,000
LOT 4 BLK 5 INNSBRUCK VILlAGES 4 5
2ND ADD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
NOTES: CONDOMINIUM LOT
CITY OF UNO lAKES
CONTACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
RICE LAKE ESTATES
24P. 3031 22 24 0024
KEY 954596 20,000
LOT 4 BLK 3 RICE LAKE 4 3
ESTATES SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
25P. 3031 22 24 0033
KEY 954685 20,000
LOT 9 BLK 4 RICE LAKE 9 4
ESTATES SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
26P. 3031 22 24 0092
KEY 1108027 10,000
THAT PRT OF LOT 2 BLK 1 RICE 2
LAKE ESTATES LYG SLY & ELY OF
~
. ,
SUBOMSION
SEC. OR TWP. OR
LOT BLOCK RANGE
APPRAISEO
VALUE OF
LANO
FOL OESC UNE, COM AT NE COR
OF SO LOT, TH N 89 OEG 58 MIN
04 SEC W ASSO BRG ALG N UNE
OF SO LOT 30 FT TO PCB OF SO
UNE, TH 5 22 OEG47 MIN 04
SEC W 32 FT, TH S 67 OEG 01
MIN 00 SEC W 18.5 FT, TH N 89
OEG 58 MIN 04 SEC W 60.2 FT TO
W UNE OF SO LOT & THERE TERM
SO UNE, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
TOWNSHIP OF UNWOOO
CONTACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
BICKS SHADYLAND BEACH
27P. 04 33 22 31 0001
KEY 643815 .
LOT 30 BLK 7 BICKS SHAOYlANO
BEACH, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
CITY OF ST. FRANCIS
CONTACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
3,600 .
30
7
DEGARDNER 2NO ADD
28P. 31 34 24 14 0017
KEY 785092
LOT 7 BLK 2 OEGARONER 2NO AOO, 7
SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
-5,000
2
~
PUBUC LAND SALE UST
1996
EXHIBIT H UNPLATTED
SUBDIVISION
SEC. OR
LOT
TWP. OR
BLOCK RANGE
APPRAISED
VALUE OF
LAND
CITY OF ANDOVER
CONTACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
UNPLATTED
1U. 17322423 0007
KEY 552280
THAT PRT OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF 17
SEC 17 TWP 32 RGE 24 OESC AS
FOL: BEG AT A PT ON S UNE OF
SO 1/4 1/4 274.93 FT E OF W
1/4 COR OF SO SEC. TH N 35 OEG
W ALG SELY EXTN OF SNlY UNE
OF LOT 1 BLK 3 AlLAOIN ACRES
179.78 FT TO MOST SLY COR OF
SO LOT 1, TH N 41 DEG 46 MIN
15 SEC E 198.21 FTTO MOST ELY
COR OF SO LOT 1, TH N 25 OEG
45 MIN E 383.72 FT TO SE COR
OF LOT 4 BLK 3 AlLAOIN ACRES,
TH N 1 OEG 03 MIN 43 see W
207.75 FT TO NE COR OF SO LOT
4, TH N 43 OEG 27 MIN 17 SEC W
381.57 FT TO CIL OF CSAH NO 58
TH NELY ALG A 424.41 FT RAO
CUR TO LEFT. SO CUR HAS A
CENTRAL ANG OF 32 OEG 47 MIN
06 SEC 242.85 FT TO N UNE OF
SO 1/4 1/4, TH E ALG SO N UNE
507.60 FT TO A PT 1760 FT W OF
E UNE OF SO NW1/4, TH 5 ALG A
UNE PRLLJW & 1760 FT W OF SO
E UNE 1317.94 FT TO S UNE OF
SO 1/4 1/4. TH W ALG SO 5 UNE
5n.37 FT TO PCB, EX RO, SUBJ .
TO EASE OF REC
19,100
32
24
CITY OF BlAINE
CONTACT THE MUNICIPAUTY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
UNPLATTED
2U. 32 31 23 14 0022
KEY 1070646
THAT PAT OF 5112 OF NE1/4
OF SEC 32-31-23 LYG ELY OF
FOL DESC UNE: BEG AT A PT
ON N UNE OF SO S112
1813.55 FT E OF NW COR
THEREOF, TH S PRLLJW W UNE
OF SO S112 450.42 FT TO N
UNE OF FRED REHBElNS 1ST
INDUSTRIAL ADD & THERE TERM
185,000
32
31
23
"
o
"
SUBDMSION
SEC. OR
LOT
APPRAJSED
VALUE OF
LAND
TWI? OR
BLOCK RANGE
& LYG NLYOF SO ADD; EX RO;
SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
CITY OF COON RAPIDS
CONTACT THE MUNICIPALITY FOR LOCAL BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES.
UNPLATTED
~
3U.153124110009
KEY 330500
THAT PAT OF W 701 FT OF NE1/4 15
OF NE1/4 OF SEC 15 TWP 31 RGE
24 L YG S OF N 1035 FT THEREOF
(AS MEAS AT AT ANG TO N & W
LINES THEREOF) EX THAT PAT
THEREOF L YG SWL Y OF Nay RJW
LINE OF TH NO 10, TOGIW S 450
FT OF N 1160 FT OF E 22S FT OF
W 926 FT OF SO 1/4 1/4 (AS
MEAS AT AT ANG TO N & W LINES
THEREOF) EX THAT PAT THEREOF
L YG SWL Y OF NEL Y RJW LINE OF
TH NO 10. ALSO S 352.13 FT OF
N 1062.13 FTOF E67 FTOFW
993 FT OF SO 1/4 1/4 (AS MEAS
AT RT ANG TO N & W LINES
THEREOF) EX RO, SUBJ TO EASE
OF REC
NOTES: MAY BE SUBJECT TO REASSESSMENT
24
8,000
31
4U. 1531 2411 0010
KEY 330519
THAT PAT OF S 352.13 FT OF N 15
1062.13 FT OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 .
OF SEC 15lWP 31 RGE 24 LYG W
OF CIL OF OLD CSAH NO 11. AS
MEAS AT AT ANG TO N LINE OF SO
NE1/4. EX W 993 FT THEREOF. AS
MEAS AT AT ANG TO W LINE
THEREOF, TOGIN THAT PAT OF
NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SEC 14 SO
TWP & RGE DESC AS FOL: COM AT
NW COR OF SO 1/4 1/4, TH S ALG
W LINE THEREOF 710.07 FT TO
PCB. TH S 67 DEG 54 MIN E
92.98 FT +OR- TO CIL OF SO OLD
CSAH NO 11, TH SWLY ALG SO CIL
TO SO W LINE. TH N ALG SO W
LINE TO POB, EX RO, SUBJ TO
EASE OF REC
NOTES: MAY BE SUBJECT TO REASSESSMENT
8,000
31
24
5U. 21 31 24 11 0007
KEY 330957
THAT PRT OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF
SEC 21 TWP 31 RGE 24 DESC AS
FOL: BEG AT A PT ON NLY RJW
LINE OF CSAH NO 1 104.5 FT
NWLY OF E UNE OF SO 1/4 1/4
(AS MEAS ALG SO NLY RJW UNE),
28.800
21
31
24
,
SUBOMSION
SEC. OR
LOT
TW?OR
BLOCK RANGE
APPRAJSED
VALUE OF
LANO
TH NWt.Y ALG SO RJW UNE 100 FT
TH NEl. Y AT AT ANG TO E UNE OF
SO 1/4 1/4. TH S ALG SO E UNE
TO INTEPJW A UNE DRAWN NEl.Y
FROM PCB (AS MEAS AT AT ANG TO
SO NLY RJW UNE), TH SWLY ALG
SO UNE TO PCB. SUBJ TO EASE
OF REC
NOTES: SUBJECT TO 20' SIOE'NALK EASEMENT
6U. 24 31 24 24 0004
KEY 331439
THAT PAT OF N112 OF S1/2 OF
~1/4 OF SEC 2431 24 DESC
AS FOL, BEG AT A PT ON 5
UNE OF SO N112 250 FT W
FROM SE COR THEREOF. THW
ALG 50 5' UNE 7S FT, TH N .
PRLL.,W E UNE OF SO N112 160
FT, TH E PRLL.,W SO 5 UNE
7S FT. TH 5 PRLL.,W SO E
UNE 160 FT TO PCB, EX RD.
SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
24
12.000
31
24
~
,.
, ,
;..01..-
RESOLUTION ~108
EXHIBIT J (UNPLATTED)
Page 1
'-" .....,
....;:,.
. ~~. I.' .
~, ".i:l . .
t ......;1.-';
."H..,':'
......::.
i';!~\::': .
:~;~.;?i' .
:;L~l~~.;, .
:.' : r:~'!i:" . .
:'.;I,.J.... ._
""i'Y'-.,"
~:~;. ';" ,.
0;':'..<,,'
....,.' .
':1;.'r*:~',:
..i"~' i - :
?It;;:.
:'~""I
PUBUC LAND SALE
1966
EXHIBIT J (UNPLATTED)
Subdivision
See. or
Lot
Twp. or
Block
Range
Appraised
Value of
Land
CITY OF COON RAPIDS
Contact the Munlcfpallty for Local Bulldlna and Zonlna Ordlnanc.s.
.....:..
'.. ~ .. . .'
.' ".,,'"
lJ.
(Pin to be Assigned)
That prt of Lot 2 Aud Sub
No 57 Iyg EIy of fol clesc
line, com at NE cor of sd
lot, th W aJg N line thereof
460.84 II to PCB of sd
line. th S 50 deg 30 min E
2IT.74 II to a pt on S line
of sd Lot 297.0811 WIy -of
SE cor thereof & sd line
there term, ex rd, subj to
ease of ree
2
$25,000
.. ~ ,"':. .
.":.::,~-;,,
.....:.....
....1;,l..
..........,'.
. :.....
-"'r.t. ;Z~:i.
:,.!f.,.'o:;.:
~"':"'';r'.
.1 . ..~"..,.
.":"'~'~ '.
":..!".h.". ~.
::k'~~i: .'
'~-:";'''' ..J:
:-::.t.,..-,.
f',~:,\-:: '
";'';;-''':'''l
:....1 '~l:;.:: ~':
.'.':~f~{;; ,
Subject to reassessment
.:.:.~.I.... :
;;:a'/'.;"
:;{::i\:'
;f~;~~'j; :.:
';;'i.=;I_':l
:;.>~~~.'~.
'~:;j~~~f; .
A':;~,}\~: . . , :
..-,.....~.
':..~.':...l .
....:o:.:I';
.." ,..
:. ~.f":;~".
i~~~,
:';. '....;..:..
.~~;~:~~;.2~
'....".i..'
;;. ""'r,'"
. ..:.~..~;.' .
:;Hf>::
..r~.~~~:'. .
"~r;>~"",
f:;:i;~~:;,
('H'~
. ::!.',.:':r.. .
"I,'
~:,l:S:':t'
,.,';:).w'':.
........J,;... .
.,..:..,,;",.n
:~;~.~~~! ::i ~ '.
. o:i~.J'1::;:..
.,.....:r..
~1. :......;,~:1
~:~(l~~;:::. .
,!;a""\'
. r:'~~' .~~':"
".~,',.
,~ ';:'
;~~~r
...,.....
RESOLUTION 1il6-108
EXHI81T K (PLAlTED)
Page 1
I.i' :
(~...;
:.r~II,' .
.......
,!,},:,'
,:)1/:,
,".,11...
,".
1,."...-,
....::..-.
PUBUC LAND SALE
1966
EXHIBIT K (PLATTED)
'p"ii'
;~7;;t'.~
~~:~t
....". '.
~f.l""
t':],ti
~... .;.....
Subdlvlalon
Sec. or
Lot
Twp. or
Block Range
Appraised
Value of
Land
":0 j...
,~~~"\:.l:
"'.':
....."t'-,;.'
~\IOo"
,_"~
/:~i? .-
~:~:!"~ '.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Contact the Municipality for Local Bulldlna and Zonlna Ordinances.
~'.. ;.
r~;"'l>_~:
i~";.::""
:1;.;':;.,
.;4. :>...'.
:........,.
......,.'.,.
.-:4""....
:';ti~':' .
.......1...,
.:~:]:.~.
......:~..
..-,....
1 K. (Pin to be assigned)
Lots SA & 58 Blk 1 Ooty
Wellner Add. sub! to ease of record
5A.58
1
$27,000
"'.':':'i-.'
:;:,':'1."'.
t;.f:?'
.~ :' ,..
.:,t:.~..:
';::-;;'"\.'
j',:.r'-!~'
....i-..,....
'..;";1:'"
':\o1.:',t..
"'-oi.
. "".:::<;
'-!l't.:.-,
: ~<-~"
.'." .
:'7~~".
I...t.';,;
.i:.....
'-:.:~; ... " .
I.,;" _'. .
~i.",. ;~". .
~~;~. .-.
::.iC~:~':.'
~J.,
:r~::!:\:
~~~:.:
I.r''',,_ .
1-',<0'1..;
'~.~~~~;:
~~~:~::.
:~~~~':'.
'':fo';.~~
...J"",,'L.
'~:~ii'':'
;,.......-\!-,
I' ~.
..,.:;-....
:.;~..~~.'.:
-"--:.- .
.'.~~"J .
;f~'f
'~"!: ;
"', ~'~ '.Ii . '.
'.-i...: ~ '.
.",;.:".
r'..:;~
:':1".':.:..
,......,'
;...1.i" :'; .
.>i...u'j-
~.it,~;i.~,,: .
...~:.;, ..... " .
:., ';."~'I: .
.~:.~~<;