HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK October 23, 2001
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.' ANDOVER, l\-fINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
/ FAX (763) 755-8923. WWW.CLANDOVER.MN_US
Special City Council Workshop - Tuesday, October 23, 2001
Call to Order -7:00 PM
Transportation Issues
1. Anoka County Highway Department Discussionl5 Year Plan/Upcoming & Future
Projects - Engineering
2. Review Draft Transportation Plan RFP/01-18 - Engineering
Comprehensive Plan Issues --
3. Metropolitan Council Review Comments - 2020 Comp Plan - Planning
Other
4. Sports Complex - Alternate Site Concept... Administration
5. Anoka County Archery Range - Facility Review Issues/Update - Administration
Adjournment
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
j FAX (763) 755-8923. WWW.C1.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: John Erar, City Administrato~
FROM: Scott Erickson, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Transuortation Issues
1. Anoka County Highway Department DiscussionIS Year Plan/Upcoming &
Future Projects - Engineering
DATE: October 23, 2001
INTRODUCTION
A presentation will be made by representatives from the Anoka County Highway Department
regarding upcoming County improvement projects within the City of Andover.
DISCUSSION
Representatives from the Anoka County Highway Department will be present at the workshop to
\ review their 5 Year Highway Improvement Plan, discuss upcoming improvement projects and to
) address and answer questions of the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
o!tf//d!L-
Scott Erickson
I
DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Round Lake Blvd. Reconstruction
2. Intersection Improvements
- 161 sl/Round Lake Blvd.
- 157th/7th Ave.
- Hanson Blvd.!Crosstown Blvd.
- Hanson Blvd.! Andover Blvd.
- CSAH 20 @ Round Lake Blvd.
- Other projects
3. Hanson Blvd. south of Bunker Lake Blvd.
4. Crosstown Blvd. between Hanson Blvd. & Andover Blvd.
5. School zones in front of the new Andover High School
6. Others
!
CITY OF ANDOVER
'\ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
j FAX (763) 755-8923. WWW.CLANDOVEKMN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: John Erar, City Administrato~
FROM:
Scott Erickson, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Transportation Issues
2. Review Draft Transportation Plan RFP/Ol-18 - Engineering
DATE: October 23, 2001
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to review the "DRAFT" Request for Proposals (RFP) soliciting
consultant services for the development of a transportation plan for the City.
DISCUSSION
During Council goal setting discussions, the City Council identified the need for a transportation
plan for the community. The draft RFP has been prepared and will be reviewed with the City
, Council. Once the RFP is completed, it will be submitted to a number of different consulting
J forms, soliciting proposals from them.
BUDGET IMP ACT
It is anticipated that the cost to develop and prepare a City transportation plan will be in the range
of $50,000-$75,000.
The funding will be from the City Road and Bridge Fund.
Respectfully submitted,
cV~
Scott Erickson
\
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
, 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
I FAX (763) 755-8923. WWW,CI.ANDOVER.MN_US
Special City Council Workshop - Tuesday, October 23,2001
Call to Order - 7:00 PM
Transportation Issues
1. Anoka County Highway Department Discussionl5 Year PlanlUpcoming & Future
Projects - Engineering
2. Review Draft Transportation Plan RFP/01-18 ... Engineering
Comprehensive Plan Issues
3. Metropolitan Council Review Comments - 2020 Comp Plan - Planning
/ Other
4. Sports Complex - Alternate Site Concept - Administration
5. Anoka County Archery Range - Facility Review IssueslUpdate - Administration
Adjournment
'\
1
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
Main Phone - 763-755-5100 Fax - 763-755-8923
FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET
Date: /o/Z3
Fax # Total Pages: f (including cover sheet)
Attention: l~c\.;C'- r;
.......:J
Company:
Sent From: ~c?1I E,'L /6 =>-
Comments:
The information contained in this facsimile is confidential information
intended only for the use of the individual or entitv named above.
If all pages were not received or if there are questions regarding this information;
please call the person listed above at 763-755-5100.
g:\staffib.rbwlf.xcov.doc
"
~ ORi\fl
I. INTRODUCTION
\
)
The City of Andover, Minnesota, is a growing community located in the central part of
Anoka County. The current population is 26,000 with approximately 300 new homes
being added each year. The City's comprehensive plan anticipates the population to be
by 2020. The Andover City Council has determined that both short and
long-term transportation planning is necessary to guide the future development and
transportation improvements within the City of Andover.
The objective of this request is to select a consulting firm to perform a study and develop
a transportation plan for the community. The study will coordinate with and also be
included as a part of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The transportation plan is intended to facilitate community goals and improve the City of
Andover transportation infrastructure and services by:
.:. Relating the transportation system to both existing and future land use and
community comprehensive plans.
.:. Identify improvements to existing and future transportation infrastructure to meet
existing and future transportation needs. This component will also identify
~f1. -estimated improvement costs-and recommended time frames for implementation.
'()R ... Identify improvements to multi...modal transportation systems within the City.
.:. Identify the need and options for alternative modes of transportation for the
community (i.e. Park and Rides, Bus Service, ext. . .)
.:. Provide an analysis and options for the most efficient way for Andover residents
to benefit from light-rail and/or other mass transit initiatives.
.:. Identify regional initiatives which are currently in process or that need to be
addressed.
The City of Andover will provide background data toassist the consultant in the
development of the transportation plan.
II. SCOPE OF WORK DRAft
The following is a list of the minimum work required under this contract. If the
consultant feels that there are additional tasks and/or elements that would be of
substantial benefit to the City they should be identified separately from the RFP response.
Any elements added will need to clearly define the scope of work and related expense
and will not be just an extension of the work identified within the RFP. The selected
consultant will be required to prepare a final work plan for the City on conclusion of the
RFP process and before proceeding with contract tasks. The consultant will be required
to complete all work under this contact within twelve (12) months after notice to procee&
)
DRAFT /,
v
\ A. DATA ACQUISITION
)
The selected consultant will identify the information and data needed to accomplish all
facets of the planning effort, will search out and evaluate the information and data that is
already available for use, and will be responsible for collecting and/or developing any
additional information required to accomplish the transportation study and objectives.
Information known to be available which the consultant should review and utilize as
appropriate includes:
- Anoka County Transportation Plan
- Anoka County Five Year CIP
- City of Andover Five Year CIP (Currently under development)
- City Survey Regarding Park and Rides
B. MAJOR SYSTEM MANAGEMENT ISSUES
:> The need to expand Hanson Boulevard Capacity and improve the roads
transportation capabilities. --
:> -.Identify and prioritize intersection improvements, signalization, turn bays,
parking, lighting, and safety, along with any other improvements that should be
considered to enhance and improve the existing transportation system. Prioritize
upcoming and future City and County Improvement Projects.
:> Identify the need for and location of collector/arterial streets in new development
areas. Review and make recommendations regarding the existing municipal state aid
street designations within the City.
>- Identify the need for improving both the east-west and north-south movement of
local traffic throughout the City.
:> Identify upgrades to existing streets/roads to meet future demands.
>- Identify the need and provide alternatives for the location of pedestrian and
bicycle trails throughout the City.
>- Identify policy issues and construction methods for access control, traffic control,
traffic calming and speed limit modifications throughout the City.
>- Identify funding sources and opportunities for sharing of project costs on joint or
multi-jurisdictional projects and/or improvements.
>- Identify and develop opportunities to coordinate future construction projects with
adjoining communities.
>- Review and incorporate adjoining communities transportation plan.
>- Evaluate and identify Park and Ride options, locations and funding sources.
>- Identify bus service options, which could be considered.
:> Identify opportunities and improvements for Andover Residents to utilize the
light-rails systems being planned and developed.
:> Crash analysis for high accident locations and recommendations.
>- Opportunities for utilizing access management to protect or enhance the capacity
of the street system.
.
>- Aesthetic standards ofthe street network
, >- Right of way issues and needs.
>- The study shall include a review and inventory of potential funding sources for
the recommended improvements.
>- Develop a County street turn back acceptance policy and criteria for consideration
of acceptance. Identify potential turn back street segments,
C. PL~GFACTORS
The transportation plan shall be included as the "updated" transportation component of
the City Comprehensive Plan. All components required by the Metropolitan Council
shall be included with it. The planning times frames utilized for the City Comprehensive
plan shall be carried forward within the transportation plan. The transportation plan
shall also include a complete build out scenario.
The City Transportation plan shall also address all transportation planning efforts
developed by neighboring Cities, Anoka COJJIlty, State of Minnesota, Burlington
. Northern Railroad and any other agency which may impact this planning effort. --
J D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
This project will entail public involvement and public meeting work. The consultant
shall include a public participation program in the RFP to maximize public awareness
and involvement in the development of the transportation planning process. In order to
gather significant interest on community concerns the consultant shall conduct meetings
in the community to identify and deal with local transportation related concerns. The
citizen participation component will be a key element in the development of this plan.
The consultant's citizen participation component shall, at a minimum, include the
following components:
* Identify mechanisms for informing/educating the public about the transportation
study process. Public input early in this process will be required.
* Mechanisms for public participation shall be identified. Plans for gathering
information from the public, local government boards and commissions and other
appropriate agencies shall be defined.
* Mechanisms for documenting participation, recording input, analyzing, and
summarizing the responses during all phases of the process
~. An indication of the materials (media releases, handouts, presentation displays,
newsletter articles, cable TV spots, web page updates) that the consultant will utilize
in public communication
,
E. PLANNING OUTPUTS
\
,
The consultant shall develop an implementation plan, including short-term and long-term
recommendations and alternatives for the management and improvement of the existing
and future transportation needs for the community. All proposed improvements shall be
described in sufficient detail, including sufficient detailed design concept and scope, and
estimated engineering and construction cost in 2002 dollars. These recommendations
shall address the issues described in the RFP and shall be prioritized on the bases of (1)
significance of system needs met and/or problems resolved (2) immediacy of targeted
needs/problems, and (3) effectiveness/cost efficiency in dealing with targeted needs or
problems. Where alternatives are available for resolving issues or problems; these are to
be identified.
The consultant shall provide a written report addressing all topics identified within this
RFP. Draft reports shall be presented as necessary to provide the opportunity for input
and review. The consultant shall be prepared to make revisions as necessary during the
development of the report.
Upon approval of the final draft twenty (20) copies of the completed report shall be
submitted for final consideration by the Andover City Council. A copy in electronic
format shall also be provided, along-with electronic copies of all supporting analysis,
maps and information.
III. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Ten (10) copies of the proposal shall be submitted by, 2002. The reports shall
be submitted to:
Attn: Mr. Scott Erickson, P.E,
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard
Andover, Minnesota
Proposals at a minimum shall include the following items:
. Project Approach. The proposal shall provide a clear understanding of the
consultants approach to the project along with a complete detail of the project
requirements, which shall include a description of each task necessary to
accomplish the project. This shall not be a simple restatement of the scope of
servIces.
. Project Schedule. A proposed work plan by phase, indicating the tasks to be
completed, work schedule, consultant personnel who will perform each major
task, persorubours and costs required to accomplish each task, and the
I involvement anticipated by City Staff.
,
. Project Personnel. The proposal shall identify all personnel to be involved in the
, project and shall define their respective backgrounds along with their key
responsibilities and descriptions of their role and duty on the project.
. Relative Experience. This portion of the proposal shall demonstrate the
experience of the firm and the project team relative to there past experience with
projects of similar scope and magnitude.
. Performance. Shall clearly demonstrate the ability of the firm and the project
team to perform the project in a timely and cost effective manner.
. References. Shall contain a minimum of three (3) municipal references that may
be contacted relative to the projects identified in the experience and performance
areas of the proposal.
. Public Participation. A public participation program detailing consultant's plan
for obtaining public input and identifying the specific mechanisms to be
employed in meeting the requirements identified in the Scope of Work Public
Participations section.
CONSULTANT SELECTION
-
-. -- The City of Andover will convene a consultant selection committee to evaluate and rank
the consultants responding to this RFP. This evaluation and ranking will be based on the
proposals submitted. An interview will then be held with the selected consulting firms
who appear to be particularly qualified based upon the written proposals,
The evaluation and ranking of consultants will be based on the following factors that will
be weighted as show:
1. Consultant's proposed "not-to-exceed" cost estimate to perform the work outlined
within the RFP.
2. Consultant's knowledge/understanding of the goals and tasks of this project along
with their knowledge of the community and general area. Clarity, consciousness
and organization of the proposal. Will the consultant dedicated sufficient
resources to accurately complete the report in the time frame identified.
3. Qualifications and expertise of the key personnel assigned to the project and their
proven ability to work together as a team on similar projects.
4. Qualifications and availability of the key personnel identified in the work plan.
Availability of support staff and resources.
5. Record of past performance on similar projects.
6. Comments and opinions of references.
7. Adequacy and feasibility of the consultant's public participation plan, Will it
inform and involve the community with the study process, provide adequate
opportunities for involvement, factor public concerns into the development of the
study, and provide documentation of input received and how that input was
utilized in the study?
,
r
The consultant selection committee will rank the consultants and provide a
\ recommendation to the Andover City Council. Any questions regarding this request for
proposal shall be directed to Scott Erickson, City Engineer at 763-767-5130.
/
J CITY OF ANDOVER
/
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923. WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmemhers
CC: John Erar, City Administrator~
FROM: David L. Carlberg, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Issues - Planning
DATE: October 23, 2001
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to discuss the major outstanding issues of the 2020 Andover
Comprehensive Plan as indicated by the Metropolitan Council. Issues include: 2020 MUSA
boundary and the City allowing lot splits; permanent rural land use controls; the 2040 urban
reserve boundary and land use controls; the accommodation of an additional 1,000 acres outside
the 2020 MUSA Boundary; and the future ofthe CAB interceptor.
DISCUSSION
2020 MUSA Boundary - Allowing lot splits in the transition area
The plan currently allows the splitting of parcels as small as 2.5 acres in size within the 2020
urban reserve or transition area. According to Met. Council review, to be consistent with the
regional policy, lot splits would not be allowed of less than 20 acres. Current development
practices (lot splits) show a limited number of splits occurring in the transition area. In fact, only
eighteen lot splits have been approved in the entire rural area in the past seven years (an average
of 2.57 splits/year).
Permanent rural land use controls
The plan allows one unit per 2.5 acres density in the remaining undeveloped land in the
permanent rural area. The regional policy guides this land for one unit per 10 acres. The Met
Council suggests that to be consistent with permanent rural policies, the plan should protect
agriculture to 2020 and identify protected sensitive natural areas.
Agriculture should be protected at 1 unit per 40 acres. This is consistent with the requirements of
the State Agricultural Preserve Program. Although the plan indicates that 1,441 acres are
/ currently enrolled in this program, the underlying zoning (R-l) allows development to occur at
one unit per 2.5 acres upon decertification.
In regard to identifying and protecting sensitive natural areas, the plan does provide land
\ acquisition criteria for public control or ownership of property for the protection of significant
) resources and preserving significant landscape features. However, the plan does not identify
specific protected areas.
2040 urban reserve boundary and land use controls
Based on projected growth in the Regional Blueprint, the plan does not identify and protect
adequate lands for future urban growth after 2020. As the Council is aware, the plan establishes
the 2020 line as also the 2040 line. Met. Council requests the plan identify an urban reserve
beyond 2020 and measures to protect this land from premature development by restricting land to
a one unit per 40 acre density. The 1,000 additional acres beyond the 2020 would satisfy this
urban reserve issue provided the necessary restrictions were placed on the land to prevent rural
development.
Accommodation of an additional] ,000 acres outside the 2020 MUSA Boundary
Based on review and study by the Metropolitan Council, there is sufficient capacity in the Coon
Rapids interceptor for an additional 2,000 households. This translates into 1,000 developable
acres being accommodated through this interceptor beyond the 2020 MUSA boundary. Council
will need to consider how and where this acreage should be developed. The boundary of this
area could be and most likely will be considered the 2040 urban reserve line.
Future of the CAB interceptor
Don Bluhm the Manager of the Municipal Service sector of the MCES is currently reviewing the
regional service needs in the metropolitan system. Currently the Comprehensive Plan reflects all
long-term and ultimate urban service needs to be provided by the Coon Rapids interceptor. The
City has not planned to utilize the CAB interceptor. The MCES is evaluating system needs and
system capacity of the CAB from information provided through comprehensive plans of cities
that can utilize the CAB. As a result of the evaluation, the Met Council may reassign flows and
capacities within this system. This may result in the Met Council taking capacity once assigned
to and reserved for Andover and reallocate it to another community.
The Met. Council is currently coordinating a meeting/workshop with Coon Rapids, Anoka
Ramsey and Andover to discuss the CAB and sewer issues, Council will be asked to select
potential meeting dates in November for this workshop.
ACTION REQUIRED
Discuss and direct Staff on how the Council wishes to proceed on each item listed above.
Respectfully submitted,
~i.r~
Community Development Director
@~~n
\
.I P Presentation Executive Summary
Agenda Item: 2001-
-
Meeting date: November 7, 2001
ADVISORY
INFORMATION
Date: October 9, 2001 DRAFT
Subject: City of Andover Comprehensive Plan -- Referral File No. 18158-1
District(s), Member(s): Metropolitan Council District 9 (Natalie Haas Steffen, 763-753-4298)
Policy/Legal Reference: Minn. Stat. ~ 473.864, Subd. 2 and ~ 473.175, Subd. 1
Staff Prepared/Presented: Sandra Pinel, AICP, Principal Reviewer (651-602-1513);
Eli Cooper, Director, Planning and Growth Management Dept (651-602-1521);
Caren Dewar, Director, Community Development Division (651...602...1306)
DivisionfDepartment: Community Development/Planning and Growth Management
Overview
The city of Andover, located in Anoka County, is ranked 16th in anticipated growth to 2020. In 2000, Andover had
an estimated 27,013 people in 8,658 households, and an estimated 3,050 jobs. The Regional Growth Strategy
(RGS) identifies three policy areas within the city of Andover; 1)existing Metropolitan Urban Service Area
(MUSA), 2) permanent rural area and 3) urban reserve area. The city has fewer than 200 vacant acres in the MUSA
and proposes to stage MUSA expansions to 2020, Andover is not a Livable Communities Act (LCA) participant,
but the city adopted housing goals on February 24, 2000 and incorporated them into its comprehensive plan. The
Council provided the city with a planning assistance grant for $10,660 to help the city update its comprehensive
plan.
The plan is consistent with Council forecasts and Regional Growth Strategy policies for the current and proposed
MUSA. The plan identifies a 2020 transition area and protects it from subdivision until sewer is available.
However, to be fully consistent with regional policy, lot splits should of less than 20 acres should not be approved
in the transition area. The implementation element should also be strengthened to ensure that planned densities are
achieved in the urban area in order to accommodate forecasted growth, meet housing goals and use regional
infrastructure efficiently.
The land use plan for the area outside the 2020 urban transition area is inconsistent with the Regional Growth
Strategy policies for the permanent rural and urban reserve policy areas. The plan allows one unit per 2.5-acre
density in remaining undeveloped areas, including the eventual development of areas currently enrolled in
agricultural preserves. Although a density of one unit per 10 acres is not feasible in most of the area, the plan
should protect natural corridors and agricultural lands, The city should also work to increase density within the
urban area and reduce it in the rural area to ensure that most growth is accommodated in the urban area, rather than
in the rural area.
Andover's plan is in conformity with the regional system plans for aviation, recreation open space, and
transportation. Because the plan does not identify adequate land to accommodate growth after 2020, it is not in
conformity with the regional wastewater services system plan. The plan constitutes a substantial departure from
that system plan in that it allows rural development to continue in an area previously planned for service through
the CAB interceptor. The city has requested to transfer growth to the Coon Rapids interceptor but does not plan
land that could be served with sewer to accommodate growth after 2020. Before the Council can approve the
comprehensive plan and proposed change to sewer districts, a plan modification is required to remove at least 1,000
acres from the proposed rural area that that could eventually accommodate an additional 2000 residential units
through the Coon Rapids interceptor.
I
Proposed Action/Motion
That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Review Record and the following conditions and
recommendations:
1. That the city of Andover cannot put its 2020 Comprehensive Plan into effect until the following plan
amendment is incorporated.
2. That the city modify its comprehensive plan to remove at least 1000 acres from the area that is
presently guided for rural residential and protect those acres from premature development by
prohibiting subdivision and lot splits under 20 acres so those acres are available for an additional 2,000
residential units after 2020, if needed.
3. That the Council implement its alignment policy until the plan is made fully consistent with the
Regional GrO\vth Strategy and addresses the remaining contingency requirements of the Council's
March 8, 2000 plan amendment review (File # 18158-3) by:
. Limiting growth and guiding land in the rural area to be consistent with the Council's rural policies
by protecting agriculture at one unit per 40 acres and by reducing density in vacant areas to protect
natural corridors and undeveloped areas.
. Identifying lands and adopting policies to protect at least 1000 acres for growth between 2020 and
2040 so as not to preclude development at urban densities, when needed, and limiting lot splits in
the 2020 transition area to ensure 2020 urban growth is accommodated.
-
4. That the city fully pursue opportunities for implementing its life cycle housing goals and work to
achieve maximum allowed densities in order to meet housing goals and accommodate growth in the
staged urban area at an overall density of at least 3.6 units per net acre.
, 5. That the city of Andover identify priority areas for acquisition of easements or lands to protect-natural
heritage areas, natural resource corridors and areas that are priority for protection, where rural
residential development will be limited.
6. That prior to the construction of any extensions or additions to its disposal system, the city submit a
Comprehensive Sewer Plan (Tier II Plan) to the Council for final approval.
BACKGROUND
On March 8, 2000, the Council reviewed a plan amendment for MUSA to support a new Anoka-Hennepin School
District High School within the city of Andover on lands that had been emolled in agricultural preserves. The
Council's action was to allow the amendment to be put into effect contingent upon the city incorporating housing
goals for mix, affordability and density into its comprehensive plan update and addressing issues related to the
consistency of the comprehensive plan within regional policies and system plans. Since then, the city worked to
change the plan to address most of these conditions including adoption of housing goals and water resource
management policies. The city adopted life cycle housing goals at the Council's request. However, the plan does
not address conditions regarding the urban reserve and permanent rural policy area. The Council's alignment
policy limits Council funding and assistance to counties and communities with comprehensive plans that are fully
consistent with the Regional Blueprint.
LINKAGE TO COUNCIL STRATEGIES
~ Infrastructure: The city requests additional MUSA to accommodate the planned growth through 2020.
Primarily the county provides transportation infrastructure and the city should augment this capacity.
~ Quality of life: Plan promotes single-family urban and rural growth with some limited redevelopment and
higher density/commercial areas. Plan supports regional parks and trails.
2
\ ~ Communication/constituency building: On March 8, 2000 the city agreed to make the comprehensive
I
-' plan consistent with regional policies as a condition of receiving the Council's assistance with MUSA for a new
high school (plan amendment referral No. 18158-3).
~ Alignment: Plan is partially, not fully, in alignment with regional policies, plans and conditions of March 8,
2000 Ian amendment review for high school. The Ian did include housing goals, as reviously agreed.
ATTACHl\iENTS
Comprehensive Plan Policy Matrix
Review Record -- Review of the City Of Andover Comprehensive Plan
Figure 1 - Location Map, City of Andover
Figure 2 - Regional Growth Strategy Policy Areas, City of Andover
Figure 3 - Regional Systems, City of Andover
Figure 4 - Staging Plan, City of Andover
Figure 5 - Buildable Rural Acreage
Figure 6 - Land Use Plan, City of Anoka
I
I
3
...~ ("'J OIl
--- Q) - ~ .....
....... --- Q)'''''' --
....- ",--. rJ) f' +-'
c:: Q)N>~8~ i=O
0= ~~.~O~e~O ~E
\ . ~ 0 ___...c...c ~ OIl'''''' ~. Q) S u
, _____ ...c.......u>. ......'" >0 Q)
J ...c o::l ~ ~ o::l - 5 c:: '00 0 - 63 ... ... t:)
...c Q) "0 I::: 0'8 <;::. o::l I::: N e rJ) <+=i <8 Q)
Q)"'''Ci E;:;Q)......l:<rJ).DQ)rJ)2 Q)Q) ~
",...o::lQ) "O~"O~Q)S"Ot) "'E:iC::
- 0 c:: rJ) ..... ~ ... I'''''' Q) Q) OIl c:: ~...:::l Q)
= S ............ - U o::l...... U ...... - ...... -... >
w "" o::l ........... ...... Q) ,.., 0 I::: w _ 0.. I-.
Q) .D Q) ...... ___ - - - Q) _...... .D W Q)
800...... rJ),::::;'Q)~0 o::l"'~ ...o..SrJ)
lr) ~ U ...... .......D S 0.. S ~ p.. ~ Q) Q)
8 lr) ....S .c:: S _ Q) Cil 0 0 Ea ~ ...c "0 t:) .8
= '-' <8 rJ) !i~;,:::... c:: E-< = - o::l ::::"8 >. rJ)
UO"Oo::l Q)Q)~00 o::l~...... ~~rJ)o::l
~ ;; Q) ~ .2 "Sn ~ S '51..d S "Ci g ...... Ea ~ ~ .
~NSb i=Oc:: ~p~~Q)--- 5t:)u...c>.
- 0 -"....... --. .,...-I - ;;> ~ > ...--. +-,"- U ......
00 o::l rJ) - rJ) Q) 0 ..... 0 l:< Q).D rJ).D :;.........~
~...- c= ro ;.....; ....t:::: ~ $-;"- "_ "...... ::s ~...c:: \J
...c p.. Q) c:: ~ U ...... ...... 0Il?:S...c o::l. rJ) rJ) Q) :> Q)
...... 0 "0 0 ...... o::l...... ~ '~U Q) rJ) c:: rJ);;> ...=
~ 6' '- 'On 0 'en ~ ...... ~ S o::l E;:; c:: 0 "2 ... ...~......
o 0 ...... Q) S.-;:: Q) I::: OIl ~ Q) c::.9 g o::l ,s 0 '-
5h 0"\ -;:: ~ 0 c:: t) ,S .::l 2.D o.~ ...... rJ) o::l 0. 0
o tH ... ~ o::l rJ) 00 rJ) "0...... > rJ) Q) ~ Q) c::
y - ;.... +-' ""0 CI) ~ t..r) __ .- ro __ .~ "_ "......"- Q) to) o.
,..... ,S 0 _ t) . rJ) rJ) . U ~ rJ) "0 c:: U ...... .........
~ rJ)6'~ Q)EaN'-;::6~~OS.D o::l:"=:i@,St::
~.. o::llr)O ""-oc:: ...o...cw~ _0:>1:::0
Eo-; ~ 00 U ~ p........ ~ u o::l <;::. CIl -l:l CIl ~ 0.. ;;>...... 0..
< '
~ ..... Q)
~ Q',Q 1:::< vi
~~ ~~ b rJ):"=:OO Q) 0
~~1 U ..... -- ...... "0 Q) "'1' ~ 0 ..-., ~ -
_ M ~ rJ) ..... 0'" ,... N >-' Q) Q)
"->...... --..... I::: - -- uo~ Q)o"" rJ)-...
II"""" N__ Q)CIl o::lo o::l ...,.,:; Q)o::lu
O ~ ..... \C "0 ...... rJ) N - N o::l N Q) ......2 o::l
o >. Q) o::l 0 ...... rJ) ...... I
" . "C _Q) ~ t) _ ... 0 'p N c:: Q) o::l S lr)
.... Q) rJ) . u...... ~ Q)...... wI:::'
~ Z ;: ,.S:l.D I::: a o::l "0 Q) .8 S o::l.S .D ...... N
~ _~oo CIlo::l ......Q) "0 =c::...... S~~
/ < 88 '" ...... .-;:: <.,:.:i I::: "0 ...... 00 '='"0 .S!l "5 c' c:: "8
. , _ 0 c:: I o::l _ rJ) 0"\ .~ .- ...... ...... -
""" '"' '"' '" .... ...... n '.,J Q) 0"\ -..., 0 o::l,..,...... "
" . -.... ~ '" ...... .:::: ~ o::l ~ I-< . Q) Q) o::l ...... - c::
~.... =u:!oo~ ("'J~"Ci ~lr)V3N-~~"Og"OE.saQ)
O~ OO=~~"'1' CIlSQ) ",00~",SOIl"OEaN3's~~
~ =lr)~ ~c::"O ("'J~",,~0.::lQ)_rJ)00Q)~
~~ ~=lr)oo 0Q).2 --~-~rJ)~p..o::l.D~"O...
I"""'" "'~ ~ = _~ '" ::::::...s:: U
5:::: ~ . ~ - ~~ ~ ~.S ... · · ·
u= I:::
~ o::lOrJ)
~ = ~N~O
~... E ~ 0 U ~
~ . .. Q) ... N o::l ......
~ .g S E <8 ~ 0 >.
o =::2rJ) 0.. Q) rJ)C::::::"'1'.D
U i:lSo.g .sa S "Oo::l~~~
_ lr) ......, Q) g. Ea c:: 0.. :;.. 0
~"'1'O Q) > _ .-0......1-.......
~ '" ... Q) Q) ...... ............ Q) 0..
=:"'1'00 U "0 > u~c::rJ)8
....- ~ o::l :>-Q) Q)......~Q)..
.~--7 __ ~-~ ~w_
~o__ 2 Q)tH 0 0 p..-.D,S
~ 0 0 ...... Z I::: ..J "I-< :>< ...... 0 c::
.... 0 0 I::: ...... ...... ..... Q) o::l ...... .-
~N ~
- ~
I -"'1' ~ ... ·
-~ a3
'" = ..
~~ .J.
u_____ """
Q).. = Q)
8~ ~ ;>
~'-' .c ~
'" .. '"
) Q -::l ..-., Q)
N- .... /OJ
Q = ..... ~ .....
M~ ;:: C =
-.... -- rI'l -- ~
Q=",.. ell .c
c;=.g Qj.s ..
N "'='-' ~ 00 ~
o ~
-"'1" C C ...... CIl Q) Q)
. 0 --en 00 U...... ,"d>
"d ...... "d _ n "d....... Q).... n Q) i-.
... ......-! ~ t.f.l +-01 ~ 0 ~ Q)
~ CIl;::J .......,;:l Q) Q) Q) U 0 0 "d '...... ........ Q) CIl C
..c Q) 0 ~....... ..c l-< .......;::J l-< ...... l-< C U {5 C Q) 0
\ .~ CIl t) .............. ~ i;:l ro 0.';:: "d 0 Q) p... ;::J ~ en p... "-' l-< 0
) ::0 (5 ~ 'CiJ l3 Q) tl ~';:) ~ ~ ~;e ~ 8 >-. ~ C ..s .~ ~ u
.s ........ tr) C .8 "d "d .s "-' ~ >-. ...... CIl 'S ~ .';:: ~ ~ Q) c.n >-.
~ Q) l-< ~ ........;::J 0 ___ CIl 'CIl...... C 8 OCll ...... ~ U ...c or:: > Q) l-<;::J.n
~l-<Q)~ _~........ "d~C U ..c~n""'Q)"""
___ 0 p... U __ ';::l ro Q) Q) --........... p... U 0 ....... "'-' "d "d C ...... "d
.s S . 'I:........ co';:) ~ "d S ~ "d E:J ,.......;::l Q) p... C Q)
~ .';:: 8 0.0...... ~ on;.::: 0 ;>.. S ....... >-.'E > ~":::::'.~ g ..s,~ t::
Q) 0 C ~ ~ <.+-:i ~ 0........:-...... .';:: 0....... CIl .:::;' ;::J 0 Q) U Q)
.!::: ~ ;::J @ u ~ v ~ p..."@ a ,S .~ U U ~ S C 0"' _n > ~ CIl
ro n - ........ Q) Q) ........ ...... ........ ~ '''' "d..... ('j Q) ;::J Q) Q) <.i-i Q)
........ "-' ...... ...... l-< 0.0.... ~ CIl <.+-:i CIl....... C .u:::; 0 l-< ...... "d ;::J.n
{5 0 0 ~ 8 ro . SCIl] 5 s;::J'~'~ S ~ g ~ 3 g ~ Q)n a$ C ~ "d
l""""'4 ~ >--. u ~ 11) ~ ._ ......-! "- I,,'J ~ ~ 0 ~ $....l ~ cd --'
Q)OO......~ uop...onS;::J~:::::o ('j~"duo;::J8.nQ);::J~
l-< 1.0 'C;; > B l-<;::J ~ 0 Q) ....... ('j Q)....... 0.0 :::; ,Q) C Q) CIl t:: ,..., l-<;::J > 0 0
UI.OC 00"dl-<~:::;"d~0.0 0"'" ('j......~..... rou......
~ Q)c~;;;C\~...c~l-< C u'B~:::;Up...OQ)...c"""p...
o 2 "d ~:;:) ~ 5 o'~ S cB ~ ~'c;; ~ .n ~ ;;; ~ ~ ~ .a (5.s ~
C'l ~.S Q)...:::........ Q)....... ;;>::::: "d .......;::J ro ~ CIl S ........ 0 ~ C Q)
'- S 0.0 t) 0 l3 .n u ...... ~ Q) s ~..8 CIl en ~ P- ~ ....... .~ ',;:l t+:;< CIl.s 1::
O',;:l c ~ p...;::J CIl . 5 CIl ~ CIl l-< Q) Q) ro........ ...c c ...... ~ l-< Q) ~ .......
S ~L8lr!~~] gft; ~ 5b~ t) ~ ~~"@ a 0;;; B~cB.g 8_~
E C ;::J C'l.2 c 'C;; 'C;; .~ "d l-< .~.~ .~ .~ 5.3 5 ~ CIl:.a ~ C OJ)'......
';:: ~ ~ l-< u"d O;:lo c...c C o.oo...c 0 0';:: 0.00.....-9 0 l-< ~ l-< g.
"'........ ~ Q) C C ....... 0 U C l-< U Z '~Q) 0 -' ('j u........ 0
~ ~ b p.......... ro u...= U ro ~ ..... p... ro Z C l-< U ...... f.FJ "" ro ~ <+=< ~
Q)
on .n ~
C "d Q). ('j l-< l-< 0 .......
....... C C ~ 0 :::; ..... 0 B 0 ...... p...
l-<roO ~ ~""";::Ju <+=< ...... CIl ro
E~,;:: ~ ~"dS~1::>-.~ Q)~ Q)B~
CIl .... '''...=..... ~ Q)....... Q) ro u.::: .n U CIl
;::J ro CIl ...... l-< ....0 "0 ~..... p.......... CIl 0 l-< 0 CIl C
U g "d 'S: ,9 o.....S ros ...= ';:) "0 ;::J ...... E _ p...o t) 00
'-0.. C ;;>....... tr) ~n u.......,..., 0 .......... .......
CIl ...- ~ CIl CIl _ "'-' ro..............c ro.::: ~ l-< .b U
E 0- Q);:l "d~ Q) ~ CIl >-. ~ ;::J p....CIl
Otr)"@t)C -gCCll~p...]~:;:l roe;lh"d-BS
SI.Ol-<roO roro- Q)c "d--....CIlCl-<O
O~n;::J..n -roOCll-<OC...... Q)Uro~Q)<.i:<' Vl
...... tr) ~ ~...c Q) U CIl "-' t;.:: > p..._ > l-<
a CIl "5 N~' f.FJ on o.o',;:l ....l "@ 0 I ;;> >-. 0 ro ;;> 0 B
C ::9 U ~ 'C;; 0;::J...... 'C;; ~ o',;:l ..s .n - ',;:l ~ ....... p...
ro .::; .1:..... C ~ S ~ C (5 ~. ~ "5 "@ "d ~ 5 Q) U Q)
- -' 0.0 C Q) tr).... ('j Q) ....... l.(") S Q) Q) CIl Q) e
~ t:O ~ ;:l "d 00 ~ :::; "d Z U - ,,,j ,,,j U 0 t:: "d ~....... t:: Q)
"'" "'" ""'....... Q) CIl > Q) ......
. . . . . . 0 0 0 U CIl B ~ ~ CIl.S
~ Q) .s
en 0.0 0........... ...... >
......Q)Cen tr) Q) .s ;;>
ro l-<....... Q) C'-l Q) Q) CIl . "d 0
~i;:l2e "d S"d E:J (5~@bb
@8~5 ~ B~ ...c C;~~
........ u CIl ~ "d >-. ~ :>:...= $5...n
...... l-< Q) n ........ CIl n ~. 0-;;'0 l-<
C Q) Q) l-< f.FJ --d ..... - CIl C .~ Q) ;:l
ro p... 0.0 t) ~..... S g C; ;::J"'= CIl l-<
;;!,,;::roQ) 0 ;::JroonO"d o-;:lo
,~ C l-< ...... tr) 0.0 <.+-:i 0.0 Q) U ro "d <+=<
>;::J50 ~ "d~C;~~ CIlCC>-'
c,,~ .... ....................--.... roOro......
ro Q) l:: ..... .::; ~ ~ ;::J C U 0 ...= '51; ';:)
~5~B ::E::E....lS~....l~ O~~~
.- ~ ~ ro
. ... UOf.FJu
=
- '" ~ =
E e 0 ~ loo<
= ~ = .5 Q)
, ~ ~ Q loo< ~
: ..... ,0::;=-'= Q...",
I = ..,'" Q ~ c...- Q)
~ \ ___ .... ~ \ '" \ tI':l OJ C,J
- .~ _.....-- = .....-
= """ '~~loo<<:J "'>
~ I: = ..... <:J ~ ~ ~ loo<
.- Q>c.JQ., loo< Q)
e ~ '~-<~f.FJ ~ ~f.FJ
~ Q Q;
~ == ~....
..8_ >-.0) OJ Q) oB
,0 ro .-:::;g ~ ~ (:j t u) +-' VJ en
~ 0....... =. U Q) 0,) Q) "'0 0 -
ro 0 0 ........ <1J 1-0 lo-l '"'0 Q) U) U 0.) .- ""':::: --a
'i5. .-< .5iJ ~ ~ g "0 <8 g .::: ~ 3 "0 ~ :B =
\, ....... (l) -=: ....... a E ""'d ~ - U".I _ 0 c.> ~ ,:;:S ~
J 00 ro..... ,0 ro .... ='"' 00 oro ~ .
O"\....c ~~..o........ ~c uC'iJ Q) ;:::::1:::: = 2(1)
;:; ';;;-5 ~'8 3 g,g s 8 ~~ ~ ~ ~ CD~ .g-5
'- Q) Q) 0 OJ ~ t) l-I ;... ~ I: 0.. ........ s::::::
0..... a ..<:: :::' N ..<:: i'5 0. ro . 0...<:: 0 "0 .-< 0 '-" '" .-
,,_, ........ ....... 0 ........ ....... (!) 1""""....... ~ C :::: - = - -- .........-4
...... (l) ~ 0 C!.) 0........ ~ u c:: '...... _''01 cd::'> .- ;::::: ...t:: ""'0 v
~ 0;> ::r:::.a N5'" 9~= 0::: ~ ,;>~ roE-< -~
c ::: ........ u Q) t.t=I C ~....... C'iJ U >. Q) ......:::= ---" 0 tI)
o 0 = ~ ro ..<::, ro 00 <;:: -= '" n c; 9;;l -'0 0....; 0 0
d U (l) ~ ....... ~ - C'iJ..... t: "' ...., _'-J - bJ) '-I ..c 1-0
f;:; ~"tj ~..8 Q)Mp,. ..0.80:-::::: t:: o........u =(1) u""O
o 0 '.-4 0 "'0 ..8 Q) ....... 0 ~ u.B .9 U) 2 '" '- ~ tIl "'0
~ en ""Cd bJ} '- cd ,-t ""' C = en bJ) I"""" - tf.)..., ""0 C'iJ
'S c ~ c ~ 1-0 E= .-::: 0.. 0 ~'oo OJ ::: [) ~ ~ ';::: = a.>
0' 0 8 U) '00 ::l U) U -8 u 0 = ~ g, a :;::; ,.g u:> ro.J:l
0.-<= ::l 0 . ooUo 0........ ro;> "'-
l-I 0 '_ ..r:: 0 r:d ...0 0 _ Q) ......, U CJ tr.l '- E Q).~ .............:::::
U N 00"' ~ ..t:: ~ ~ 8 ';j t:.S ~ M -:S =. ~ s:: ~ ~ ;> 'a :j
..( .8 S 0 .0 cd 0 N ~ ~ =. ::: ~ -:S ,9 .S ~ S U) ~ ~ ~
Jo.t\ _ (l) rl;; '-00 III r~ ...... ...t:: Q) cd = r.n .- ~ 0 .:::: Q.)...... ""':: U'.J
~ __.... '-' _ '-' '" ......... - . _ ::. '" "0 '"' .- = '"
= ........ U) C -= 0 = 0.. u)..... ;. ~ C'iJ::: .-.-::: Q) '0 ~
';5 0::: ~ c; .g ...... c; 0. ,- 8 0 8.,g i:: u e 0 s ~ a 0-5
=..... = ::l =.... . ::::,D"<:: .-,.- 0 0 ...... 0 0 '" E
~ CD tJ .9 tJ ,.g .9 ~ r;- ..8 3 ~ ::a "8 v.; ~ c; "0 -5 "0 = a 8
~ tJ ~ ~ ib CD ~ 0 ~ ~ =.5 = 0 .00 =' g a '" .Q ~ 0 0..
'" ....::: ~ ._ ;::l ~ 1-<_...... to:> ro..... 0 0 = 0 - .... .- - :>
== ~ (j) ~ ...c: E: ~ OJJ.~ :: "'O.,D U OJ 0 '.;j l-I 0 ~ e cd 0 =
j ~ ~ ~ ] -5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..8 a oS ~ .~ ~ ] E ~] ~'~
8 v.;::: :;::;~ ":"<::08 ~~i3 0..2 fi; -<gj~ "8:EO;: ot::
""""" ~lU ,--=_ N,-:::c:~ :....."a~ """"" ~ ;....o..r:: ~::1o ~o
:::: 0 ~ ::. 'a- .....::: 0.9 ~ '3 = <;:: ~ ,0 u CD ...... dO...." 0.
o l--4 > ;;> Cl.) tI) - ~ """"" t:::r (l),...I - - >.'- 0 ~ 0 ""0 ~
0. <8 .C: <;:: ro 0. i:: 0::: ~ 9 0 a.J:l 5' 00 ::::: ..<:: .- "0 N oil ca
o - ~ """"" "'... ~ "'... ~ /ro-l ~ ll)~'" C _ (l) - C) t+-I "'""
..... ...... 0. 0 I .-. ~ ~ <lj Ul M _ 00 ro <;:: - 0::.' 0......
""""" ::1 ...... '",= = Ci:i C ,- ~ cd Q.) ~ - ;.... - ~ Cot ;> 00
~ .J:l 8 <Ii .~"3 ::l '00 ~ t ~..<::.J:l ~ ~ .B 0. ~ "0 Cll.9..<:: ~..2
..::; 'ro = a - = .......... :....... - d l:< ro d ro = I::: - 0 ro-......
_ 0 C'd (l.) 0 .~ 0 ~....... ,;:...-:::: ~ "'0 ~ ~ u ~ '- ~ ~ - s::
c; N~fi; 0..... -;::u=5 ~"'::: -~ .B~", ~s""" 0.0
00 g ,,00 <8 0 .5 ro d ~ 5 = i'5 d "9 ~ 0 ~ O::l"::; ~ '"
.... _ ~ ,- "0 ~~ l:< w 0 U l:< '"' 00 a ~ ..<:: d 0 --......
(l) 0 cd t:: cd (l) '_ .~ ~ "'0 ::::: cd'- ~ ro ~ :: ~...t::....... s::
(l) ......::: (l) Q.) - U) -!:= C5 Q.)...... ~::: M !:= ..'" :::: .-....... ...t:::: Q.)
J a ~ t:: ~~:@ 8 ~""-E S t!:;~ ~~.;s B ,~.8 a ~~.8.-::: e
= ~..2..... =.@ ~ ~ .B ro <lj o:s ~ 0. ~ '0 i3 .p ;::lo S = ::: a ,~
cd U ....... C cd > - cd 0 :..... 0 "'0 0 ?' 0.. tI) - ~.- (l) 0 --
;:;-' 0 ro.J:l ro 0 ..... = ;::'S 0 ..... 0 0 0 ._::l U '-"0 - 0
~ 5-l0,.c;'" f.t-lc:;o..cd ~!-.d Bo 0 ~>"'O ...ll)..o"'O
ll) c.8 .: 1-4 ~ "'0 0 ~ ;.... ~ ~ Q) ~ ro N r.fS Q) "'0 a ..d u ~ ',= Q)
.~ :9 G'; ..2] . i3.5 <8 0 & '" 8 ::: 00' :3 a ~ _ .~ -< 5 il,~
= 00= ....00 fi;;::lUlO "I:le3'i5."O.... Ul o"5iJro ......CDe- aa
ll) ..c 0 ro L-I tf.) ~ _.o.~ 0 -... ~ au u:i.......... ..t:: c "'""2 c!:= 0 0 ~
..<:: 0 0 _ <8 ro...... ro c: U N .~ U -< ..... ro = .... 0 0 ._~ 0 O::l
~ tf.) ....... e ~ u "'"" b.O~ ... .:::: ll) bI) cd (1) Q.) ..t::;.... ll) en s:: ~ VJ
0. ::l "0 2 t: u 2 e cd 0 00 :::...d . t:::E a s .-::: en ..r:: ,- .- = tI)
a 0 0 ..:;! = .... CD 0..... -8.... 0 '00 <Ll ::. ...... gj - '" ro ro
..c '"0....... 0..'- U) ll) s:: _ U t.:l s:: N ~ ~ >. t..O ;> .~ s:: 0 ~ c:; . ;.... ..=
o ::::.- = CD 0 t: ..=.- ro fi; ..c ,_ 0 0 o.~ ro :>.. :>...- 0"0 0 0:>..
U u51Q.) t::.......~ ::~s:: ::::.;;N ...d:::- C .-:::........d. l'J)dOlJ E..........;
,00 5 00 8 '5iJ i3.5 <8 u .g~:::s ~'s tJ oo.~ 8.. aro -= .u ~,~ ,- ~ CD CD 5 ~
..... 0 .- -= ro CD - = ~ 0 ;> e:: 00:>.-< c: 0 ;> <:::: i::...... = '" 0 a
~ u..d t: t) cd 2 ~ ,- ~..e ~ ~ cd 8 ll) cd UJ . t.8..t:: ~ cd Q.) Q.) '00 .- U
o '" ~ g, "0 3.9 :::: ~..2 c:: ~ ~ -5 :g -:: 2 ?;; 8 8 E-< "0 -= E -5 g a ro G
] ~ 8 Q.) ~ 8 ~ & ~ ....... ~ ~ - ~ ~ 5....... ;-40:: u d 2 ~ ~ ~..c --a~.g
-< 1:3 CD -5 0 ~.::: 0 -g"8 =0 ~ s g~ 00 S ~ 5 -;:: .5.9 ~::: CD ~ E tJ s:; =
~ u.~ "'"" ~ '-I tI);::::S cd._ !l) Q3 ~ "'0 s:::::: ~ Q) tI) ~ u..c c:=::1 > <t: ..:s
o ro.... c8 .....;:>, = ::l 0 ......... .....:> = "0 = d Ul a .- t:: 0 CD .- 0 a 0 '0.
t:: ":+:: "":j ~ C\S "'O,.c ..'" ,- ~ Q.) C\S s::: Q) ~ c ~ "'"".- lZl d "'0 M
-c <Ii ro 4-< '" = = - s::l _ ~"8 @"O.J:l ro a c: ro 0 @ 0 0"<:: ::l l:<'S .... ~"O
._ Q.) _ 0 Q) cd cd cti...... cd _ J,...j - Q) - eo - 0.. ~ Q) 0 Cl)._ ":l - Q)
u ~ ~ 0 'u - 2 g - ~ _ 8 0.. t::::1 0.. cd 0.. 0.. ~ 0.. ~ ll) U ..c.:= S ~ (l) c..
0"00;;:::::::: ov.;- oof'l" O~oo 05"0 Oro oro>,.;:! 0:::"" 0:::00
..t::. 0.. ..d If) o...c ~..c -..........d .......- ...d ....... C ..r:: ~ ..c l-l !-. '-I ..c 'o",J ........,....t::: "0
E-< ::l E-< _ 0. E-<.~ 0 E-< 5h 2 -5 E-< 3 -5 E-< 0.. ro E-<..::; E-< E-< ~ ~ E-< ~ -5 E-<::r: ro
_ N M .."f Vl ~ t- 00 0\ .,,;
00.
Z
~o
....
/ 00. 00.
C-'~
Z...:l
....u
~z
Zo
~u
REVIEW RECORD
REVIEW OF THE 2000 CITY OF ANDOVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
/
BACKGROUND
The city of Andover is a growing suburb located in southwestern Anoka County. It is bordered on the west
by the Rum River and the cities of Ramsey and Anoka (Figure 1), The southern third of the city, bordering
Coon Rapids, is developed primarily in single family homes on public sewer. The remainder of the city
borders Ham Lake and Oak Grove and is characterized by large lot residential use and agriculture use. The
city is 22,400 acres (35 square miles) with only 4,000 acres currently in the Metropolitan Urban Service
District. No state and regional highways or regular route transit services exist in Andover. The city is served
primarily by county roads. Andover expects to grow 65% between now and 2020, adding 10,070 households
and 3,650 jobs. The city ranks 16th among communities in the region in forecasted household growth for the
period 2000 to 2020 and has the highest per-capita income in Anoka County, according to the plan. The
city's comprehensive plan establishes policies to guide growth to the year 2020 and replaces the former
comprehensive plan, adopted in 1991.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
The Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act requires local units of government to submit comprehensive plans
and plan amendments to the Council for review and comment (MN. Stat. 9 473.864, Subd. 2), The Council
reviews the plans to determine their conformity with metropolitan system plans, apparent consistency with
other adopted plans of the Council, and compatibility with the plans of other local jurisdictions in the
Metropolitan Area. The Council may require a local governmental unit to modify any comprehensive plan or
part thereof, which may have a substantial impact on or contain a substantial departure from metropolitan
system plans (Minn. Stat. 9473.175, Subd. 1).
PREVIOUS ACTIONS
, , The Council reviewed the former comprehensive plan in 1991 and since that time has reviewed 26 plan
amendments, many for MUSA expansions. On March 8, 2000, the Council reviewed a plan amendment for
MUSA to support a new Anoka-Hennepin School District High School within the city of Andover on lands
that had been enrolled in agricultural preserves. The Council acted quickly on this amendment and supported
special action by the Environmental Quality Board to remove these lands from that program in order to make
the site available. Council action stated, The amendment would be put into effect contingent upon the city
incorporating housing goals for mix, affordability and density into its comprehensive plan update and
addressing issues related to the consistency of the comprehensive plan within regional policies and system
plans including:
. Management of individual sewage treatment systems and updating the water supply plan and sewer flow
projections
. Documentation of transportation issues
. Availability ofsufficienf land at medium and high densities to achieve housing goals
. Staging of development to accommodate growth and protect the permanent rural area
. Adoption of policies to protect the urban reserve for development after 2020
This review includes analysis of the comprehensive plan and consistency with the above conditions.
ANALYSIS
Staff reviewed the plan update for conformity with regional system plans for aviation, recreation open space,
transportation and wastewater services, for consistency with the Regional Blueprint and other chapters of the
Metropolitan Development Guide, and for compatibility with the plans of adjacent governmental units and
school districts. Materials received for review included:
7
. The 2000 Andover Comprehensive Plan, received December 1999 and including the Andover
\ Comprehensive Water Plan Update completed in June 1997
. Letter to Tom McElveen Committing to Housing Goals, March 13,2000
. Transportation Plan additions, April 20, 2000
. City response to January 19,2000 Letter of Incompleteness, June 8, 2000 including land use, housing,
water and sewer information, lSTS management, capital improvement plan and housing goals
. Additional response to July 5, 2000 meeting on forecasts and land lise, September 12, 2000
. Sewer flow corrections, September 20, 2000
. Land use and sewer flow information, June 14,2001
. Corrected land use tables and staging areas, received August 27,2001
REGIONAL BLUEPRINT (Sandra Pinel, AICP, 651-602-1513)
The Regional Growth Strategy identifies the city of Andover as located partially inside the existing 2000
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), the urban reserve and the permanent rural policy areas (Figure
2). According to the Regional Growth Strategy, approximately 50% of the city will remain in the rural area
after 2040 with the remainder planned for staged urbanization,
The city's plan calls for 70% of the city to remain permanently rural residential, at one unit per 2.5-acres,
- with no additional lands coming into the MUSA after 2020. The plan proposes to continue both in-fill urban
development and rural residential growth while maintaining natural resources and encouraging economic
development. Redevelopment areas and a stronger community focal point are also proposed.
The plan estimates only 2% of the housing is multi-family. Some areas for higher density development were
identified or proposed through planned unit development permits. During the time the plan was under
review, the Grey Oaks project with more than 400 apartments and townhomes was approved, helping the city
meet the conditions of the March 8, 2000 high school MUSA plan amendment to add affordable and life-
cycle housing goals and implementation strategies to the plan,
The following table shows city forecasts, Between 85% and 90% of forecasted growth is intended to be
within the MUSA with the remaining 10 to 15% in the rural area on 2.5-acre lots. The plan accepts the
Council's 2020 forecasts, but anticipates faster growth in households to 2010 and slower growth injobs to
2010 than forecasted by the Council. Forecasts are shown on the following table,
Growth Forecasts to 2020
population .. .. . 1990..... .. 2000 2010 . ...... 2020 ....
.
Andover 15,216 27,013 33,007 39,000
Council 15,216 24,700 32,000 39,000
Households. ..... . ........... ....... .... ...... . .
.
Andover 4,430 8,658 11,558 14,450
Council 4,430 7,800 11 ,000 14,500
" ,-- ',.', -..< .." ...,.._...._..,-..,~ .. . . . I.
Employment I. .. ... .. .
Andover 1,200 3,050 3,585 4,850
Council 1,200 3,050 4,200 4,850
8
Urban Land Use Development Staging
'\ The plan proposes to add 1,085 gross acres to the 2010 MUSA and a total ofl,952 residential acres to the
MUSA in four staged areas to 2020, Approximately 425 buildable acres are allocated for each five-year
planning stage. The staging and transition areas are shown on Map 3, With infill, staged development is
anticipated to accommodate approximately 2,550 households in the urban area by 2010 and 5,585
households in the urban area by 2020. However, the final trunk sewer-staging table submitted on August 27,
2001, shows only 3,579 more units to 2020. The city may achieve more urban growth and density than
originally planned for. Since the time the plan was submitted, the city's new residential development pennit
application summary indicates that 563 multi-family units (including twin homes and townhomes) and 734
single-family units were either recently permitted or under review at the end of 1999. Figure 4 shows the
staging areas to 2020, The following land use table is inserted from the city's August 27,2001 submittal,
Table 6.
Existing and Projected Land Use Calculations (in acres)
Existing Projected
Land
Use Net Net Added 2020 2020 Non
Category 2000 2000 Non 2000 Added 2000-20 MUSA MUSA
MUSA MUSA Total 2000-20 Non
MUSA MUSA1 Total Total
Total Residential 2710 13416 16126 1952 438 4662 12,729
. Single-Family 2597 5913 8510 1730 438 4327 6351
. Multi-Family 113 22 135 222 0 335 22
. Rural Estate (>5 7481 7481 0 7481
, J acres) 0 0 0
tommercial 214 128 34c 79 0 293 128
!Industrial 32 35 67 0 0 32 35
!Business Park 40 0 40 60 0 100 0
!public 161 380 541 196 0 357 380
R.egional Parks 0 390 390 0 0 0 390
'::ommunity Parks 312 432 744 12 0 324 432
R.ight-of-Way 81< 1220 203< 488 16 1302 1236
. Vacant\ Undeveloped
(subcategory of 109 1778 188' 1775 0 1884 1778
residential)
. Environmental
Sensitive 0 102 102 102 0 102 102
(subcategory of
vacanvundeveloped)
. Open Water
(subcategory of 29 679 708 12 0 41 679
vacanvundeveloped)
. Wetlands
(subcategory of 1009 4036 5045 420 0 1429 4036
vacanVundeveloped)
. Agriculture
(subcategory of 0 1441 1441 108 0 108 1441
/ vacanVundeveloped)
Sub Totals 4,283 16,001 20,284* 7070 15,330
Total Acreage 22,400 *based on city info. 22,400
9
I Based on development trends, development controls and existing conditions
\
J ExistilllJ ' ., ! <. . .' , Prol>osed Plan
,.
Housin!! Mix
. Single-family 96 percent 85 percent
. Multiple-family 4 percent 15 percent
Density
. Single-family 1 uni 11 acre 2.3 units/acre
. Multiple-family o units/acre 6 units/acre
The city's land use plan, as initially submitted, indicated that 171 vacant acres remained within the MUSA
(1,2l5-acre MUSA expansion provided to the city in 1996). Of that, 34% are guided forresidential use and
the remainder for commercial use. Additional information submitted by the city indicated that only 109
acres of that vacant land was developable. The plan does include several redevelopment areas including a
former landfill and older commercial areas. Rental and higher density development would be located
adjacent to commercial areas,
Density
The plan meets the minimum three units for net acre for development within the MUSA, however, the ciy
will have to achieve an overall net density of 3.65 units per acre in order to meet its goals of accommodating
90% of the forecasted 2020 growth within the MUSA. Approximately 25% ofthe proposed MUSA
residential land addition is classified as wetland or environmentally sensitive, leaving only 1,430 acres to
develop to 2020. If these acres are developed at 3 units per net acre, only 4,290 of the 2020 forecasted
growth of5,792 households will fit into the urban area, with the remaining demand putting pressure on the
rural area. The plan states that 90% of the growth or 5,213 households will be accommodated in the urban
area. The city will need to increase the net densities achieved over those listed in the housing goals (2.3 units
J per acre single-family and six units per acre multi-family) in order to accommodate growth in the urban area.
The plan states that PUD's are allowed in the low-density residential areas at densities up to 3.6 units per
acre but can be as low as 2.4 units per acre. Additional information submitted by the city on October 3, 2001
states that PUD density within the single family area can be up to four units per net acre when the developer
adds certain features (a 15% discretionary density bonus). City staff have communicated that density
bonuses for wetlands have been eliminated, which effectively reduces achievable gross density. The current
average residential density is 2.5 units per gross-acre. The city should increase allowable minimum and
maximum densities in the low-density residential area or all density or land to the medium-density areas in
order to accommodate urban growth to 2020 and achieve housing goals as discussed in the housing element
reView.
The plan is consistent with the Regional Growth Strategy for the Urban Area if3.6 unit per acre net density
is achieved in the areas guided for rural residential use. The future land use map is shown on Figure 5.
Urbim Reserve and Illustrative 2020 MUSA
The city's plan does not identify and protect adequate lands for future urban growth after 2020 and is
therefore inconsistent with the Regional Growth Strategy for the urban reserve policy area and substantially
departs from the regional wastewater system plan, The plan identifies land between the current MUSA and
2020 MUSA as a transition area, Although the area is zoned rural residential, the plan is consistent with the
Regional Grov.th Strategy in preventing subdivision of these areas until urban services are provided.
However, the city should consider preventing lot splits in this area, currently allowed by the plan.
\, Regional Growth Strategy shows approximately one third of the city within the illustrative 2020 MUSA and
) urban reserve. The plan, as submitted in December 1999, stated that urban residential growth would be
restricted to those areas within the designated 2020 MUSA boundary. A larger area was shown in the
original plan submittal as the eventual line for urban services, based on a gravity flow system. The city
10
clarified its urban reserve land use policies in subsequent submittals dated September ]2,2000, and June ]4,
2001, designating its 2020 urban growth boundary as its urban reserve boundary and eliminating the line
\ showing eventual urban services_ The city's intent is not entirely clear because the plan also states that the
j city may modify its urban growth boundary in the future, Because the city plans to fill out the rural area in
2.5-acre lots and density, any expansion of urban services after 2020 would be difficult or impossible.
Therefore, the plan should protect possible expansion areas now. Guiding development in all areas outside
the 2020 MUSA as rural residential on 2.5-acre lots and not protect lands for urban growth after 2020 is
inconsistent with regional policy and substantially departs from the regional wastewater system plan.
The city and Council had planned to serve growth in the western part of the city through the CAB
interceptor, requested by the city in 1975, while the remaining urban area would be served through the Coon
Rapids interceptor. Regiona] systems are shown in Figure 3. The city allowed most of the land to be served
by the CAB interceptor to be built out with on-site systems, a departure from the regional wastewater system
plan to serve urban growth in that area. The plan now shows this area as rural residential. As noted in the
Regiona] Systems, Wastewater Services review, the city is requesting to serve future growth only through the
Coon Rapids interceptor. However, the plan does not identify an urban reserve in that area to accommodate
growth after 2020.
The Council estimates that there is sufficient capacity in the Coon Rapids interceptor to serve 2,000
households. The plan should be modified to identify at least 1,000 acres of developable urban reserve lands
and to protect those lands from pre-mature development by restricting density to one unit per 40 acres. Other
methods to achieve the same result have also been found acceptable.
- Permanent Rural
The Regiona] Growth Strategy indicates that the northern half of Andover will remain in the permanent rural
policy area, to be guided at one unit per 10 acres where feasible, using clustering to protect agriculture and
natural areas, The city's plan for the permanent rural area reduces densities allowed in the 1991 plan, but
/ remains inconsistent with Council policies. Given the existing pattern of development within the rural area
and the city's goal of acquiring and protecting sensitive environmental areas, the plan for the rural area could
be found consistent with the permanent rural policies if the plan identified and protected sensitive natural
areas and agriculture.
Much of this area is already developed in a rural residential pattern pattern of one, two and five-acre parcels.
There are ],441 acres enrolled in the agricultural preserves program. The city's soil map also shows a
corridor of severely restricted and wet soils through the center of the city that remain undeveloped.
The plan proposes that 70% of the city's lands will remain "rural", to be characterized by rural residential
development at one unit per 2.5-acres. Smaller lot sizes will not be permitted into the future. This planned
density applies to all vacant developable land within the rural area, including 1,441 acres enrolled in the
agricultural preserves program. Agricu]tural lands are shown on the future land use map, but the policy is to
protect those lands at one unit per 40 acres only during the time period that the land is actually enrolled in the
program. The plan allows those areas to be subdivided seven years after initial petition for expiration from
the program. The city plans to amend the plan to remove clustering and density bonuses previously allowed
through PUD's.
If the city followed Council policy, the maximum number of additional households for the rural area would
be 359, as noted on the city's "Bui]dable Rura] Acreage" map, Figure 5. The plan maintains that increasing
allowed density through 2,5-acre lots will have minima] impact on local systems. The city submitted
supplementary information on June 8, 2000 and June 14,2001 to better estimate how much development
could occur in the rural area. The plan estimated that 15% of growth, or more than 900 units would be built
in the rural area to 2020. The goal was revised to 10% of new households in the rural area between 2000 and
; 2020, or approximately 620 units.
Ana]ysis submitted on June 8, 2000 indicates that up to 1,436 units could be developed on 3,590 acres,
assuming that 10-acre parcels are not developable and development is clustered. If all wetlands and soi]-
11
restricted areas were assumed unbuildable, there would be 668 new units to build-out. This represents a
density of between one unit per 2.5 acres and one unit per 5 acres build-out density for remaining vacant
'\ lands. It is difficult to predict how much of this land would be built by 2020. In its last June 14,2001
) correspondence, the city estimated only 438 acres would be developed as rural residential to 2020 (180
homes), as indicated on the Existing and Projected Land Use Table in this report. The city also submitted
information showing that only 152 platted lots have been created since 1995 and only 18 lot splits.
To be consistent with the permanent rural policies, the plan should identify protected sensitive natural areas
and protect agriculture to 2020, Agriculture should be protected at one unit per 40 acres, consistent with the
requirements of the state Agricultural Preserves Program. Other sensitive areas could be acquired or
protected at one unit per 10 acres, as suggested in the city's park plan. Regarding acquisition, the plan
includes a land use category for open space and a goal of initiating an open space acquisition program, but it
does not identify protected areas, For example, the city could target the Rum River and a corridor generally
located between Ward Lake and Round LakeJor protective easement acquisition. This has been done along
the Vermillion River in Dakota County, for example, where property owners preserve the buffer area at the
rear of their lots. The Council is currently developing a natural resource inventory and working to strengthen
agricultural protection programs. The Council would like to work with the city and DNR to identify and
develop tools to protect these areas, as further discussed below in the Parks and Open Space element review.
If, as indicated in the plan, these areas have soil and other constraints, then some acquisition and a reduction
of allowed density to one unit per 40-acres for agriculture and one unit per 10-acres for natural corridors
should sufficiently reduce overall rural density to be consistent with regional policies.
The plan should also remove at least 1000 acres from the rural residential area that could be developed if
provided with urban services, and guide that land at one unit per 40 acres or one unit per 10-acres with ghost
platting, The plan should be changed remove the 2.5-acre lot size allowed in those areas. The Council
cannot permit lands that could be needed for urban use after 2020 to be guided into 2.5-acre lots.
Sub-Regional Analysis
/ Andover is part of a subregion that includes much of northeastern Hennepin County and west central Anoka
County, including the cities of Champlin, Dayton, Coon Rapids, Anoka and Ramsey. The Council has
completed its review of the comprehensive plans for Anoka, Dayton, Coon Rapids, and Ramsey. In the sub-
regional context, Andover is a high-growth community. Regionally, the Council's forecasts rank Andover
16th among the cities in the region for growth through 2020. Andover is largely a residential community with
no regional highways, Residents benefit from its location adjacent to Anoka Coon Rapids for access to
affordable housing, employment and transit. Council staffs have encouraged the city to diversify its urban
housing choices, limit rural residential growth to protect agriculture and provide for an urban reserve and
manage transportation demands. Lands in Andover also provide an important transition between urban and
rural/natural resource areas of Anoka County and critical trail and natural corridor linkages between regional
parks.
Sand, Gravel and Dolostone Deposits
There are no deposits identified by the Council within the city of Andover.
Historic Site Preservation; Solar Access Protection
The plan states that the city will evaluate historic structures and sites for possible designation and
preservation.
The city's June 8, 2000 additions to Chapter 4 of its comprehensive plan address solar access protection as
required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MLP A). The plan also promotes solar energy design and
energy efficient housing and public facilities.
Plan Implementation
J The city submitted a capital improvement program on June 8,2000, (Exhibit 13) addressing parks, water
supply, roads and sewers. The program meets the requirements ofMN Stat. 473.859, Subd, 4 for a five-year
CIP. Land-use districts and regulations are summarized in the land use plan and water resources
management elements. The Council is concerned with the density limitations in the low density residential
area which limit planned unit development (PUD) density to between 2.4 and 3.6 units per acre, whereas, the
12
10(09/01 15:54 FAX 651 602 1674 PLNG GROWTH !gJ 014
city is largely relying on PUD's within this district to meet medium-density housing and density goals. City
ordinance No, 112, submitted on October 3, 2001, allows a 15% density bonus for PUD projects meeting
I certain criteria. PUD's can result at four units per net acre. Unless the city achieves maximum allowed
densities for most developments, the city will be unable to accommodate forecasted growth within the urban
area and 2020 MUSA, as documented in the preceeding analysis,
REGIONAL SYSTEMS
Aviation (Chauncey Case, Transportation and Transit Development, 651-602-1724)
This city's plan adequately addresses the airspace protection requirements and is in conformance with the
Aviation Policy Plan.
13
Recreation Open Space (Michael McDonough, Parks and Open Space, 651-602-1054)
The plan conforms with the Regional Parks and Open Space system. Bunker Hills Regional Park is located
\ partially in Andover as is Central Anoka Regional Trail. Rum River Central Regional Park is located across
.' the Rum River from Andover. The Rum River is a state designated Wild and Scenic River and a State Canoe
and Boating Route. The plan sets priorities for future parks and identifies planned trail routes, including the
Central Anoka Regional Trail. The city's Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities element also addresses trails.
The city could incorporate trails into a system of natural greenways. The Minnesota County Biological
Survey identifies remaining high quality native vegetative communities and habitats near and within Bunker
Hills Regional Park. The city should plan to acquire ownership or easements and use zoning to create a
lower impact buffer area around these areas, The city should consider stronger protection strategies for the
Rum Wild and Scenic River district and Round Lake including promotion of native vegetation and buffer
strips along the shoreline. These buffers along the river, lake and other water bodies, as well as restoration of
native vegetation throughout the watershed, will help preserve and improve water quality in the river and
provide habitat for birds and wildlife. The Rum River should be a focus for parkland acquisition.
The Rum River and Coon Creek Park already function as greenways for the community and Andover would
benefit from identifying other natural corridors in the community that connect parks and other natural
resource areas. A natural resources inventory utilizing the Minnesota Land Cover Classification system
would help identify existing higher quality natural areas. The city could enhance natural greenways. Efforts
could include additional acquisition of parkland along the corridors, zoning modifications, and conservation
easements. Linear recreation and transportation trails are types of corridors. The Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources' Metro Greenways program provides grants to conduct natural resource inventories and to -
help develop and implement protection strategies. The DNR contact person is Bill Penning at (651) 793-
3981.
Transportation (Carl Ohm, Transportation and Transit Development, 651-602-1719)
With the additional submittals on June 8, 2000 and September 12,2000, the City of Andover Comprehensive
Plan meets the transportation requirements of a comprehensive plan. The city was not in the transit-taxing
district at the time of the plan submittal and does not have arterial highways within its boundaries. The plan
is in conformance with the Council's transportation plan policies and system plan.
Wastewater Services (Donald Bluhm, Manager, Municipal Services, MCES, 651-602-1116)
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services provides sanitary sewer services to the City of Andover
via interceptors MSB-7035. The wastewater is treated at the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant in St.
Paul. In 1975, when the MCES planned for the design of the CAB interceptor, the city requested that 1.7
million gallons per day (mgd) of capacity be assigned to the city to serve urban growth. Since that time the
city has developed the area that would have been served by the CAB interceptor into larger lots (2.5 plus
acres) served by on-site disposal systems. This amendment to the 1991 city plan represents a substantial
departure from the wastewater systems plan in that the city cannot now plan sufficient land for urban
development within the CAB service area to make service financially feasible. Within the proposed
comprehensive plan update, the city indicates that it no longer needs capacity within the CAB interceptor.
The city has instead proposed that its entire urban service area be served through the MCES interceptor
MSB-7035.
The city has projected its 2020 wastewater flow at 2.72 mgd, The plan indicates that the entire urban service
area will be served by that time. The Council has determined that its interceptor MSB-7035 can provide up to
3.2 mgd of capacity to serve long term needs of the city. Thus, the city is required to modify its plan to
establish an urban reserve of approximately 1,000 developable acres to accommodate growth of an additional
2000 residential units or their equivalent beyond 2020.
If the city has plans to alter, expand or improve its sewage disposal system it must first submit the Tier II
comprehensive sewer plan to the Council for its approval before any sewer additions or alterations can be
initiated (Minn. Stat. Sec, 473.513), Upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan by the city, the sewer
element of the plan should be resubmitted to the Council to fulfill this requirement.
14
OTHER METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT GUIDE CHAPTERS
\ Housing (Guy Peterson, Livable Communities Department, 651-602-1418)
J
The housing element ofthe City of Andover's comprehensive plan update is consistent with Council housing
policy and meets the housing planning requirements ofthe Land Planning Act. It also fulfills the minimum
housing planning expectations of both and the Council's March 8,2000 plan amendment conditions. Though
the plan does not aggressively accomodate workforce and life-cycle housing, it does acknowledge the
potential implications of a changing housing market in a community that has until now been exclusively
owner-occupied, single family detached homes, but will experience increased pressure for other housing
types.
As initially submitted in December 1999, the plan did not include affordable and life-cycle housing goals, or
delineate sufficient land guided for medium and high density housing to achieve new affordable and life-
cycle residential development consistent with the planning benchmarks for suburbs in the North Minneapolis
Planning Sector. Subsequently, changes have been made to the document under review to include affordable
and life-cycle goals for 2010 agreed to by the city in March 2000, and to include land guided for medium and
high density residential housing. To achieve these goals, the city will need to develop its medium and high-
density residential land at the maximum permitted densities.
The plan includes a very limited examination of the city's current housing situation and demographics. The
most notable findings from the data with implications for housing planning are the fact that almost
98 percent of the city's residential units are single family detached homes, and that only two percent of its
housing units are rental. Yet, though the plan presents these numbers, the plan does not aggressively support
a diversity of housing options that are affordable to young households and others working in and around the
community.
) The plan does not include housing policies, but its land use policy section does say "Andover will strive to
provide a broad range of housing opportunities for all people, from families with children to the elderly.
Although single family housing will remain the dominant land use, this plan strives to provide opportunities
for a variety of housing styles developed in a range of densities." In acknowledging the need for increased
residential density, the plan says that "to make good use of the remaining land, the City is encouraging new
development in a more compact pattern."
In June 2000, the city communicated to the Council a comprehensive plan addition that included affordable
and life-cycle housing goals, represented in the table below, which, although less than the benchmark range
for developing suburbs in Anoka County, do represent an appreciable and significant increased expectation
of housing diversification in type, tenure and density from that which has previously been experienced in
Andover.
This same June 2000 communication of plan revisions from the city includes an extensive list oflocal
official controls and residential development requirements that will be evaluated by the city for their impact
on the "availability and accessibility of affordable and life-cycle housing" in Andover. It also includes a list
of programs and tools that may be employed in the city to provide or assist affordable ownership and rental
opportunities. The city works with the Anoka County Community Action Program to provide housing, but
this list of programs and partners should include more ofthe available housing resources such as the Anoka
County HRA, the Metropolitan Council through the Livable Communities Act, non-profit housing providers,
ef' and all the federal and state resources and potential local fiscal devices. This aspect of the plan's housing
implementation section does not include the complete array of housing development, assistance or
rehabilitation programs available to the city, and the city is encouraged to broaden its potential
implementation activities and partners.
)
With regard to the issue ofland availability and permitted development densities that can accommodate
affordable and life-cycle housing, the plan suggests local conditions that make achievement of its goals
possible, but with little room for deviation. The plan as originally submitted indicates that medium density
15
residential development can occur through a PUD at 6 units per acre, and that high density PUD
development can occur as high as 14.4 units per acre. These densities can facilitate the development of
\ affordable ownership units and rental housing if permitted in PUD's.
Clarifying information provided by the city in November 2000 indicates that "over the next ten years,
15 percent of all units are designated for multifamily development in accordance with the adopted housing
goals. ..." The Future Land Use Plan designates approximately 1 0 acres of high density multiple family
development in both Andover Station, and south ofthe WDE landfill site. Of the nearly 960 buildable acres
designated for MUSA development between 2000-2010, over 200 acres could be developed under medium
density guidelines.
The land use designations in the plan and their potential development densities will permit Andover the
opportunity to accommodate the housing goals in the plan, but with no room to retreat on any ofthe medium
and high density proposed land uses and densities. The city is encouraged to be receptive to marketplace
activity that will assuredly more often seek approval for increased residential density rather than less, given
increasing development costs and changing demographics.
ANDOVER .. ... . ... .. . CITY INDEX BENCHMARK. GOAL.
Afford ability
Ownershio 72% 69 - 87% 40%
Rental 26% 35 - 50% 35%
Life Cycle Type (Non-single family
detached) 4% 33 - 35% 15%
/ Owner/renter mix 95 / 5% 75 - 25% 90/10%
Density
Sing1e-fami1v detached 1.0 / acre 1.9 - 2.3 / acre 2.3 Net Acres
Multifamilv o / acre 10 - 13 / acre 6 units
Water Resources Management (James Larsen, Environmental Planning & Evaluation Dept. 651-602-1159)
Sanitary Sewer Element - Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS)
The city has provided Council staff with a summary of its ISTS maintenance management program.
The program includes adequate notification, tracking, and enforcement components to meet current
Council and MPCA guidelines and requirements.
Surface Water Management
The city has adopted and is implementing the Council's Interim Strategy to Reduce Nonpoint Source
Pollution to All Metropolitan Water Bodies.
Water Supply
The city has provided updated information relative to water supply, in conjunction with this draft plan,
rendering this element adequate to meet Council guidelines and requirements through the planning period.
COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS
The plan was forwarded to the adjacent jurisdictions, Anoka County and Independent School District 11 for
/ review. The city's plan appears to be compatible with the plans of adjacent local governments. Anoka
County submitted comments conceming traffic management that should be addressed in the final plan.
16
ANDOVER 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The city of Andover's Comprehensive Plan meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements for
\ 1998 plan updates.
2. The plan accepts Council household forecasts to 2020, but forecasts faster growth to 2010. Of concem is
that 10% to 15% of this growth is guided to occur in the rural area on private wastewater systems,
inconsistent with the Regional Growth Strategy policies for the permanent rural area and urban reserve.
3. The land use and staging plan for the urban area is consistent with the Regional Growth Strategy.
However, the city is strongly encouraged to increase the potential of urban growth and life cycle housing
within the current and staged urban area and to consider adopting land use controls that permit additional
medium-density housing to achieve efficient use of infrastructure.
4. The land use policies for the rural area of one residential unit per 2.5 are inconsistent with the Regional
Growth Strategy for the permanent rural area and the urban reserve and with the Council's
comprehensive plan amendment conditions of March 8,2000. Although the plan includes overlay
zoning of one unit per 40 acres for 1,441 acres that are emolled in agricultural preserves, the 2020 plan
and underlying zoning for agricultural areas is for rural residential use. The plan would allow up to
1,500 units in an area where 359 units could be built under Council policy guidelines. The plan includes
all areas outside the 2020 growth boundary in rural residential without protecting lands for urban growth
after 2020, as called for in the Regional Growth Strategy. The plan does not address the Council's
comprehensive plan amendment conditions of March 8, 2000.
5. The plan represents a substantial departure from the wastewater systems plan in that the proposed
amendment to the city's 1991 plan changes the proposed CAB interceptor urban service area to rural
residential and does not propose an alternative location to potentially accommodate urban growth after
2020.
6. The plan is consistent with the policies of the Regional Water Resources Management Plan.
/ 7. The plan is in conformity with the metropolitan system plans for Aviation, Recreation Open Space, and
Transportation. The city is strongly advised to more carefully consider local road investments that will
be needed to serve forecasted traffic in rural areas, urban areas and the new high school area and to work
with the Council and county on strategies to reduce highway traffic.
8. The housing element of the City of Andover plan update is consistent with Council housing policy and
meets the housing planning requirements of the Land Planning Act and fulfills the minimum housing
goals incorporated into the Council's March 8, 2000, plan amendment review. However, it does not
present a picture of a growing community eagerly preparing to respond to a changing and evolving
housing market. Maximum allowed densities will have to be achieved for adopted goals to be met.
9. The Andover plan is generally compatible with the plans of adjacent governmental units and
school districts. However, Anoka County has submitted comments on the transportation plan
that should be addressed in the final adopted plan document.
V:\Library\ComDevRplReports2000\Andover CPU 18158-1REVed.doc
/
17
~ Metropolitan Council
Improve regional competitiveness in a global economy
\ Environmental Services
October 9, 2001
Mr. John Erar
City Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard, NW
Andover, MN 55304-2612
RE: Response to questions raised during September 20,2001 meeting
Comprehensive Plan Update
Referral File No. 18158-1
Dear Mr. Erar:
On September 20, 2001 Council member Natalie Haas Steffen and Metropolitan Council staff
and met with you and other members of your staff to review and discuss the status of the City's
comprehensive plan update. During that meeting, you requested information related to
requirements for the City's Tier II comprehensive sewer plan and the City's original request for
1.71 MGD of capacity through the CAB interceptor.
A list of the required contents for community Tier II comprehensive sewer plans can be found in
/ the Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook, May 1997, in chapter 4, Sewers which
begins on page 4.6 of said handbook. I have enclosed a copy of this section of the handbook for
your reference. Basically, the Tier II sewer plan provides additional information to that
information that is contained in the sewer chapter (Tier n of a community's comprehensive plan.
However, in an attempt to save local expenses in developing a separate document which would
reflect Tier II information, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) has been
requesting that the Tier II information be included in the community's comprehensive plan sewer
chapter (Tier n. By doing this, all a community needs to do once the Tier I plan is complete, and
found acceptable by the Metropolitan Council, is to formally adopt the sewer element or chapter
of the Tier I plan as the Tier II comprehensive sewer plan by resolution.
If a community elects to only provide that information required for the Tier I plan, only those
requests for sewer extensions identified in the currently approved Tier II sewer plan will be
recommended for approval by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency until a new Tier II plan
is approved.
Since the city of Andover is advocating ultimate build-out of its urban service area by 2020, flow
projections in the Tier II plan need to include this ultimate developed condition. The City's
current plan indicates that all future regional sanitary sewer service needs (ultimate flow
projections) can be accommodated through the Coon Rapids interceptor (MCES 4-NS-521 &
524). The MCES has determined that in addition to the ultimate flow discharge projected in the
Plan, the City could serve approximately 1000 acres of additional urbanized growth. These 1000
J acres is the focus of the "study area" that was discussed during the September 20 meeting. Since
we are looking at the ultimate urban service area within the City, any potential urban "study
area" should be mentioned in the comprehensive plan (Tier n.
www.metrocounc1l.org Metro Info Une 602-1888
230 East Fifth Street . St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1626 . (651) 602.1005 . Fax 602-1138 . TIY 229.3760
An Equal OpportwlUy Employer
Mr. John Erar
'\ October 9, 2001
Page 2 of2
You had also requested documentation of the City's original request for the 1.71 MGD capacity
in the CAB interceptor. In reviewing the 1975 CAB Interceptor Facilities Planning Report, we
found a number of references where City officials had provided input in the Report and hence
design of the facility. However, it doesn't appear that the City ever submitted a written response
to the report. We have also reviewed our community comprehensive sewer plan files and would
like to draw your attention to the City's 1976 comprehensive sanitary sewer plan (CSP).
The City's CSP, dated June 1976 and prepared by Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Associates,
references the 1975 CAB report and re-states the need of the 1.71 MGD (2.65 cfs) capacity
through the CAB. If you need a copy of this report please let us know and a copy can be made
and sent to you. The City's 1991 comprehensive plan also outlines future urban development in
the western portion of the City that would utilize the CAB interceptor.
During the September 20 meeting several comments were made regarding long tenn capacity
availability in the CAB interceptor for the city of Andover. It is our understanding that the
proposed comprehensive plan update reflects all long-term and ultimate urban sewer service -
needs will be provided through the Coon Rapids interceptor. The MCES is currently reviewing
the regional service needs in the metropolitan system. From infonnation provided through the
/ comprehensive plans, the Council evaluates system needs and compares these needs to the
, system capacity. As a result of this evaluation, the Council may then reassign flow and
/
capacities within the system. Therefore the Council may through this process assign capacity
, that was once reserved for Andover, to another community resulting in no future service capacity
for Andover through the CAB.
The Metropolitan Council will be scheduling a meeting with a number of Anoka County
communities to discuss this issue. Once a list of potential dates has been developed the City will
be contacted to coordinate the specific date for this meeting.
If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this letter, or any other sewer
related issue pertinent to the City's comprehensive plan update efforts, please don't hesitate to
call me at (651) 602-1116.
Donald S. Bluhm
Manager, Municipal Services Section
DSB:KLC;kIc
/ C: Natalie Haas Steffen, Council member, District 9
David Carlberg, Andover Community Development Director
Sandra Pinel, Metropolitan Council Anoka County Sector Representative
Bryce Pickart, Assistant General Manager, Technical Services
-
-.
Five Year Highway
Improvement Plan
.
,
2002- 2006
J
.
,
,
J
,
J
'.
i Approved September 1L 2001
j
,
,
i
, '
J .,' .
:1
,
: ,,-
, .
'~ '" :.-' ':~-"'~-;i:-~~
; ~r~:;b~l
p 1.-.'.~~,;,' ;.~;.n,.t'1
I ~~~~11
! ~:?1~
-:.. .... :'~J~4. Prepared By:
.1 .:.:/.~,:c",;
1 .. .,....... "J .
J0;~~~f;;~1 ' .
~ '," """'C" ,1
~~~ ~,
;; .,,:.~1;3 .'. .
. 'P-<';;.c" ANOKA
1 ;y.s,~'J;';;" COUNTY
I~ ;;~;~~
( 7.<2~,'.;;': Highway Department
1 :'-','r':::~ 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW
" " ,<''''~''.i Andover, Minnesota 55304
~ i.".:.6:.',~r:-:::':<:~
Table of Contents
Paqe No.
Letter to Other Agencies ................................................................................................ iii
Letter to the Anoka County Board of Commissioners...................................................... 1
- Explanation of Columns and Terms ................................................................................ 4
-
Part 1; Rehabilitation Projects.........................................................................................5
- . Introduction to Part 1 ...................................................................................................... 7
List of Possible Overlay/Recondition Candidates ............................................................ 8
List of "Maintain" Type Road Segments ..........................................................................9
Part 2; Reconstruction Projects.....................................................................................15
. Introduction to Part 2 ....................................................................................................17
Map of County Improvements 2001-2002..................................................................... 19
Map of County Improvements 2001 .............................................................................. 20
Listing of 2001 Projects................................................................................................. 21
Map of County Improvements 2002..............................................................................22
Listing of 2002 Projects.................................................................................................23
Map of County Improvements 2003.............................................................................. 24
Listing of 2003 Projects.................................................................................................25
Map of County Improvements 2004..............................................................................26
Listing of 2004 Projects.................................................................................................27
Map of County Improvements 2005 ..............................................................................28
Listing of 2005 Projects.................................................................................................29
Map of County Improvements 2006.............................................................................. 30
Listing of 2006 Projects................................................................................................. 31
Part 3; Other Projects ...................................................................................................33
Introduction to Part 3; Other Projects ............................................................................ 35
Map of Requested Projects (2010) ............................................................................... 36
Listing of Requested Projects ....................................................................................... 37
Listing of Other Projects Identified by the County.......................................................... 39
Total Cost Estimates For All Projects............................................................................ 41
.- Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ................................................................................... 43
Introduction to CIP ........................................................................................................45
= CIP Submittal Forms For Specific Projects ................................................................... 46
i
COU NTY OF ANOKA
Public Services Division
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
r" . 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304-4005
(763) 862-4200 FAX (763) 862-4201
1'~(jK..4
",-', -.'" "', -,'.
h..'.. .. .......
- - ~~QE;N{I'~i
- .
MEMORANDUM
September 12,2001
TO: City Managers, City Clerks, Township Boards,
Public Works Directors, City Engineers,
.rf Coooty En""",,,
..
FRO.: Jon G. Olson, PE
County Engineer
RE: 2002-2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan
Please find enclosed a copy of the 2002-2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan for Anoka County. The
County Board approved this plan on August 28, 2001, which also shows the 2001 component of the highway
budget for informational purposes. Some of the work included in the 2001 component of the Plan is already
underway and we anticipate that construction will take place on all of the major projects contained in the 2001
plan during this construction season. The Plan also includes a detailed listing for improvements to the Anoka
County highway system scheduled for the years 2002-2006. This document is to be used only as a planning
document and is not a commitment on the part of Anoka County to fund any project in the year shown. In the
Anoka County budget process, no project is funded until the County Board approves the budget in December
of the preceding year. For example, the 2001 component of this Plan was approved in December of 2000 and
the 2002 component in this Plan will not be approved until December 2001. The 5-Year Highway
Improvement Plan however, does give direction as to which projects should be pursued through the
environmental, design, and right-of-way process so that they can be constructed in the year budgeted. In
approving this Plan the County Board made it clear that the Plan was approved subject to the availability of
human resources as well as financial resources to implement the components of the Plan.
Again, this year, the Plan has a significant maintenance component and includes approximately 2 million
dollars on an annual basis for overlays, cold-inplace recycling and crack sealing. The only anticipated
maintenance project selected for 2002 is CSAH No.1 (East River Road) from 1-694 to Rice Creek Way.
Pages 9-14 show road segments, which will probably not be improved during the life of this plan. This list is
reviewed annually because development pressures change as do the needs of the transportation system. These
roadways have been assigned a project year of2049 and are intended to be roadways which will be
maintained in or near their current cross section for the next 20 years. They are assigned the year 2049 only
for sorting purposes and that designation has no other significance.
-" The second part of the document begins on Page 17 and extends through Page31. This part of the document
highlights reconstruction projects that the County Board anticipates pursuing during the next five years.
~ Projects in this Plan are already being worked on, however, some projects included in later years of the Plan
are included so that we can apply for State and Federal funding. At the bottom of each annual project listing,
a summary of finances is included for the projects listed in that year. In addition, in the far right-hand column
of each list, anticipated participation by local units of govemment is listed. I want to caution the local units of
govemment that the numbers included in this column are preliminary estimates of participation expected and
should be used for budgeting purposes only. Final design components will impact the level of
iii
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
2002-2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan
September 12,2001
Page Two
participation. Actual local participation will be determined at the time the project is ready for bids. In the - -
later years of the Plan, many of the projects shown will require additional funding from other sources such as
local units of government, Mn/DOT or Federal funds. Anoka County will continue to attempt to maximize . -
the use of outside funds for these projects, as the opportunity becomes available through the region wide
solicitation and other methods. You may note that 2002 and 2003 include approxima::ely 39 million dollars in
projects, which we intend to construct using only 13 million county dollars, which consists of our County
State Aid funds and the levy designated for construction. The balance of the funds shown in these two years
.. is either Federal, State or Municipal funds, which are shown on the individual tables ~,s indicated above.
Part 3 of the document begins on Page 33 and highlights other projects. Two lists are contained in this
section. The fIrst list is a list with the year designation 2010. This is intended to be a list of projects that
other units of govemment or private citizens have requested, or for which the county has made a commitment
to Metropolitan Council. This list contains approximately 88 million dollars in projects and it does not appear
as though funds will be available to get to any of them prior to 2007. Keep in mind that projects listed in later
years of the Plan will likely shift depending on funding. The second list contained in Part 3 is a list of "other"
projects that have been identified for either capacity or safety reasons. This list contains 72 million dollars in
projects and comprises the list of other projects that we will be working to fund in the next 20 years. Adding
the two lists together, one arrives at a figure of 160 million dollars spread over a 15-yt:ar period or
approximately 11 million dollars per year. This is beyond Anoka County's ability to fllIld and outside funds
will become necessary for all ofthese projects to be implemented.
The Plan anticipates that our State Aid allotment available for reconstruction projects will remain at
approximately 3 million dollars a year through the life of the Plan.
If you have questions regarding this document, please feel free to contact me or my staff at 763-862-4200.
Enclosure
xc: Anoka County Commissioners
--
.
-
iv
COU NTY 0 F ANOKA
Public Services Division
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304-4005
(763) 862-4200 FAX (763) 862-4201
- .
- .
MEMORANDUM
September11,2001
TO: Anoka County Board of Commissioners
..
FROM~ Jon G. Olson, PE
County Engineer
RE: Proposed 2002-2006 Five-Year Plan
It is again my pleasure to present to you, the proposed 2002-2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan for
Anoka County. The theme of this plan is similar to plans of the past several years with a continued emphasis
on preservation of the existing Anoka County Highway System combined with a more aggressive program of
major improvement projects. This aggressive approach is possible due to a significant amount offunding
from outside sources.
Anoka County has made a strong financial commitment to the preservation and management types of projects
over the past couple of years. All years of the Five-Year Plan contain nearly $2 million collars annually for
preservation efforts, which include bridge maintenance, crack filling, overlays and cold-inplace recycling
projects. These projects are highlighted in part one of the Five-Year Plan. Part 1 also includes a listing of
road segments that are in a "Preserve" mode. These preserve type projects are shown with a construction of
year of2049. Further information is shown on Page 7. Another important aspect of preservation has been
implemented during 1998 with the implementation of a Pavement Management System. The output from this
system was instrumental in choosing the crack sealing and overlay segments of the preservation component of
our budget since 1998 and we feel that this system has provided is with much needed information which we
use to select preservation projects.
The second part of the Five-Year Plan is entitled, "Reconstruction Projects 2001-2006". The five years of this
plan are relatively balance financially, however, the years 2004 and 2005 include many projects for which
federal and/or state funds are being applied for. These projects are identified in those years so that the County
may continue pursuing outside funds for those projects. If outside funds are not forthcoming on those
projects, it is likely that those projects will slip into other years further out than 2006.
- -
The needs of the Anoka County traveling public and the continued development of the core cities in Anoka
County, has caused us to look at ways to fund significant expansion projects in the near future as well as the
. preservation projects discussed above. In addition, several projects have received Federal STP and HES
.
funds over the past two solicitations. The plan includes the following funding assumptions:
- 1 -
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
County State Aid and Levy .........................................................................$ 34,754,802.00
Federal Funds Requested............ .............................................. ............ .... ...$ 23,820,000.00
Federal Funds Obligated .............................................................................$ 10,503,200.00
State Funds Obligated .................................................................................$ 2,400,000.00
. State Funds Requested.......................... ................... ......... ............. ....... .......$ 16,055,000.00
Tumback Funds Obligated ..........................................................................$ 12,800,000.00
City/other County Funds .............................................................................$ 13,096,670.00
. . BNSF ...........................................................................................................$ 850,000.00
Tumback Funds Requested .........................................................................$ 21,806,510.00
CIP (Bonds & Levy)....................................................................................$ 5.800.566.00
TOTAL $ 141,887,075.00
.
The third part of this Plan is called "Other Projects". These projects are broken down into two lists. The first
list has a year indication of2010. These projects are projects, which have been requested by various units of
government or individuals, but for which funding is not available in the Five-Year Planning time frame. The
second list of projects has the OTHR, which indicates other and again, projects, which could not be funded in
the current Five-Year Plan. These projects are projects that have been identified, as being needed
improvements for safety and/or capacity reasons. This list conforms to the current Anoka County 2015
Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
The Five-Year Plan focuses on continued improvements on Radisson Road and its interchange with I-35W,
Lexington Avenue from the south county line to 149th Avenue, interchange improvements at Lake Drive and
County Road "J" at I-35W, and the preservation of County Road 10 (Old TH 10) in part. The county funding
shown includes some proposed bonding funds to assist in moving some projects forward. It needs to be stated
clearly that the repayment of these bonds is scheduled to come from the Anoka County State Aid funds,
which are dispensed annually by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Division of State Aid. Also,
the County Board will have to approve sale of these bonds at some future date. The sale of these bonds and
the repayment from future State Aid allotments, will have a considerable impact on the ability of Anoka
County to respond to other needs.
Again, it is with pleasure that I submit this Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan for your consideration and
encourage the County Board to continue to support preserving the backbone of the Anoka County System
over the next 5-year period.
-
.
.
- 3 -
ANOKA COUNTY FIVE-YEAR PLAN
Explanation of Columns
Column 1 - Type of project . -
C.W. County Wide - used for project not yet identified as
to location such as overlays or signals . .
C.R. County Road Projects
C.S.A.H. County State Aid Highway Project
.
Column 2 - Road Number
Column 3 - Project Number if Assigned
Column 4 - Description of Project
CIP - Capital Improvement Plan
CS - Construction Services
DE - Design Engineering
FE, FED Federal Funds
HES - Hazard Elimination Safety
K - Thousand
M - Million
MTC - Metro Transit
PE - Preliminary Engineering
R!W - Right-of-Way
TV - Tumback
Column 5 - Year project is currently scheduled for "OTHR" indicates after five years
Column 6 - Estimated Construction Costs
Column 7 - City Costs This column is a very preliminary estimate of what costs the city
listed might expect to pay toward the project. It is only an estimate
and may not reflect the actual city cost which will be determined
during project development and design.
-
.
-
- 4-
.
.
.. PART 1
REHABiliTATION PROJECTS
- .
-
-
- 5 -
Introduction to Part 1 Rehabilitation Proiects
.
Part 1 includes road segments on the top of our overlay/recondition list along with a listing of road
segments, which we feel, are appropriate for the rehabilitation category. Segments of roadway which are
. in the rehabilitation category have been assigned a "year" of2049. Over the next 20 years, it is expected
that these routes will not be reconstructed but will be maintained with essentially their current cross
section. There aretwo types of projects included in this list; the fIrst type is roadways that have been
reconstructed in the past 20-25 years and which have a cross-section that currently meets state standards.
Noting a "0" as the "Cost Estimate" under the column entitled "Engineer's Estimate" identifies these
projects. The second type of road segments are road segments that are deficient in cross-section, but that
.. have lower traffic volumes and, probably cannot be funded for reconstruction in the foreseeable future.
These road segments can be identified because there is a number other than zero under the "Engineer's
Estimate".
The annual funding identified for preservation of these routes is $1,905,000. It should be noted that the
$1,905,000 must be shared with projects needing maintenance work in all other categories. In addition,
on Page 14 you can see that there is a total of$141,435,268 estimated as the cost forreconstruction of
those segments of roadway that is deficient in cross-section on this list.
. -
~
-7-
0IQ''1IOI010iOOI1Iri11~I:i~;-::!~1~I~i~l~ ~1~!,I~I~ri~l~ ~ ~r;111~1~1; ~ ~ ~ ~Ill~
0;0100 OiO 0,010 0 0 0 a 0 010 a a Cia 0'0'00 a Ora 0 0 0 a a a a a 0 a 00 000 0
N~ q~qlqiqlq!q!q:qiqqiqqq,q!qiqqlql~qqlqlqiqlqql~qqqqlqlqqqlqq 00 a_la~lo. 0
Ol~'~I~I~~I~~'~I~'~~I~.~'~'~I~I~ ~,~ ~I~ ~1~'~I~I~I~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~'~I~I~ ~ r--,.-r--: ~~~ ,.:
0::;; ~ININ'Ni~.~I~.~'~I~I~'~ ~~:~I~'~ ~I~I~ ~I~I~ ~I~i~~~ ~ ~:~ ~I~I~~I~ ~ ~~ ~I~ ~ ~
0::> ~'~IID'm,m.m mm!mmI0l'0),mim1m:m!m:m O>lm m:r---'r--- r--- r--- ~I~~ r--- r---1r---1~~I~r---r---I~ ~I~ r--~ .......1"_ ~-
NU .,. .,.,.,..,..,. "'1'" .,.,.,. .,.,.,.1.,...,. .,.',,,',,,:,,, '" "'1"''''' .1 - '1 . -, - ., ., ., ;1;'1 ., '1 .. . . ~ ~~ ~
! I ! Ii! i I I i I ! I l&;iE;;lb; Z;iZ;\fj; ~ &;!&;I;; t;i!Efl:;;iE; t;;lb; .,..,. ~1tA- b9 .,.
Iii I ,! ! I I I ' , 'ii I 1
en i i ! i :0: i I I i i I I~I I:! 10 Ig.1 '01 O'OO! 101 ~I~I 0 00
W>- I I ' IDi I I 181 8118 10 01001 I~I 0 .,.0
0:::3 iO" ! 10 10 000 0 o.
, I I~i I1II l~i~l~ g I~I 16 ci ci ari o~ ~
::>0: I' 1& Iv U') to,C) 01 ..,
f-w ~I I ~ ~ z;: it; I~i '~i;;;'~l a, g:.~ ;bw CD
.,., : I~i tA-;tA- .,.~ ~-
::>> i : I~ ig I &:1 i I 01 I I '0 00 00
u..o I '0' Ig .,.
1 , gl I ! 101 g,o go
a! 1 18,8' II 8181 ! 18181::118181 'I ' '01 1 I I I i 01 0:::00' 01 - III 0000
en Ia>, I .., .J~co ~'"
0 >- 0' ISI ~ ~O> ;: vtOOO
0 0 I lalo~olol IOlol~aal 1:;1 I .,. ~.,.... ....,. 000
N ",:3 0 ., ':3 ., . '1 '1'" . - Ii: I~, w Il)"ov;
M 00: ! ~ i ~::il ~I:ill ,g:&I II ~ ~i ' j II 01" " II II Z 000
Ow 1 I~I~O::NI~ I~I~ >-~ ~I ~' I i >- 1->->- jj ~ o>a>~ .
co N> ~I I~I"'''' "'I"'I:S~ I :s z:s:S . ....
~~-
0 ~ ....,.
0 iO! 1 io.: 10.:1 I~,o.:,!!' 0.:0:: I-
tit
en 00 j8 I ! ~! I'~ 0:: 81 I~I I I~I ;: >. > >> Z a_oen...
N~ 00 I~ 0 0 00 0 "'000)0 .
00 0 0' 0 000>0
'" o-Lli oi I 01 ! I i w "':ONt?
~ 00: ~I"" "', , ~I I 0.: &no'OltC>>
II Ow ~~ "" ! I t-CO",N
v Ne; .,..,. ~ I ~~ oi
I
a i i I ...... .,.
l1.
~ 00 O,N 0 0 ~IF.a 010 0 0 91010 00 01<0 0~10 ~!f'10'010 ~ 0 9!~ '110 0 "llo 0 0010 00 II II II II II
0 '" v 0 air-- <0 a v a LO val,() 0'0 a a co 0 N'r-- 'OIt "I""" a 0 co 0 a 0 ~.I ~ g.1 8.1 ~.~ 8. ~.Ig. ~18. 8.:it 00 --:--1....0::-1
0 '" ~~~ql~~~I~I~~~~I~IQI~I~ "'.;o"~I~'~'~lo.o.,~q~lo. 00 ~g8~g
... men ~~ g ~ ~INI~!~!~~ ~~~'ml~l~ colNlo a en lO v olmd' <0 "tt .. -. m," 0 1 000" <0-"':
I E 0 '" '11:'1'" 0 ""'a '" ~i'" '" ~ ~ILO(j),a 0') co 0 co .- ..... ...... 0 co '" lD
v ;;;Ial~ "'1~1;;;I;;;i~I~I~ ;;;I~ ~1111;;;1~ ~ ~ N .,. ~ '1it' ~ ~ a> <0 <0 I.... N M M NON M "I""" "I""" <0 ,.... <0 '"
.,U ~M-tfl ~~'< -th ~~ - ~~ ujl-::>;:) I-
U "' I ;;;;;; a ~I~I~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~
W tA-~ tA-1tA-tA-tA- ~ lIl:o..w
0 , I , 0( 0.:...1
~:~I :31~T~!~1 I~ ~i ~j~i~i ~ >-1 jl~ >-'~I >- >- :3 ~I~ ~I I ~ ~ ~ :!:: ~~
~ 00
0::1:3 ...I 0:: :3 0::' :3 1:3 -w
o:'o:! ffiI0::10:'w'0:1 0: 0:1 0::10:: 0:' 0: w. 0:, I 0: 0: ffi 0::10: '0:1 0:,0: 0: c 0.:
w1wl Iw:wl>:w w w w w wi ~Iw >I~ WI~ W W > W W W .w W W ui w
~.~ >1>1 e;1>i>i~PI > > >1> >1 ~Ie; ~i~ e;1~ ~I le;, e; o > >! > I>'> > 0
_ 0 0' 0 010 0 w
" 00 _iOO! 10 00 000 ...I -I-f-l- I-If-I-'-!f-'f- f-,f- :s
:a ~i~!~~I~I~I~!~I~~ ~I~ ~'~i~l~ ...1'- -'...I -..Jlenlf-.- f- - f- -I- Z
&1- ~1::;;1~1~1::;;!~_leni::;; en::;;en ~ ::;;::;; en::;; en!en::;; :E en'en enien :'Een :s l1.
., ::;;1:5!:5 a :5 ala :5 :5 a a ala :5a :!::
::::; :3:310~ :3::310::1:310:3 :30:3:31:310 ::;; :510:: ::;; :5 ::;; 13 51:5 a :5 a z c
c :::l u,w :::l U :::l!~ U U U U U :::l UIU U U U U U U U U UiU uu 0.:
U'U U ...I UIU W U U U U U U U U U ;:) ...I
~ w,w,w::> WIW > WIWW W W w W W W ::> UJ > ::::> W:J: ILU W LU lU W WW 0
u 0:: 0: 0: u.. 0:0: 0 0:10:: 0:: 0: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0: 0: u.. 0: 0 u.. 0: u..IU 0: 0:: 0: 0: oc ~,~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0::0:: !::. 0
Gl ' .<= ~l"" ol~ :.: c
a; 0._ ~~i~ (\11010 N
0'" ""0 f;l~ ~ a> ~o N"" 0"" 00 ON ~ 0 a> N~ N 0 "" <0 00 N~ NO N 0.: Z
Ul 0:;:: N'" ~N ""'" ~ N "'~ ~'" ~~ ~ '" N~ '" ~ lD ~~ ~ '" ~ ~ "'~ a>lD loOMCOCO ~~ ~ 0 0(
E U) ~ ~I~ C'-~Ig ;: >-
'" M~ ~ ~ '" ~O N~ '" '" ~~ ~ ~ "" ~~ lDN 0 0 <0 '" ~N a> <0 ...... "I""" CO'N lD'" N :s
2 ~<O ~'" :;;'" "'~ """" """" ~<O "" "" "" ~~ a> '" a> ~ "" "" "" a> ~"" ....... m COicn a> ~ '" Ul ~
'" '" "'''' '" '" '" "'''' "'''' "'''' '" '" '" '" "'''' "'''' '" '" '" '" "'''' le~ "'''' en CJ) C>>'O) "','" '" ::> '"
0 ...10.. ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ "1""""1""""1"""- ~~ ~ 0 OC '"
~ w '"
l1. -.<= ~<O ~~ ~~ oa> ""~ O~ ~~ O~ ~ 0 ~ a> a> ;2;b "'~ ~ ~ ~ <0 ~~ N ~a> O~ ~~ "" <0 a> ~~ W >
",- 0..
~ ,- '" NN N~ ~N NN NN "'N ~N ~N ~ '" N~ '" N~ N ~ NN M N~ ~<O ~N ~~ N ~~ Z 0
tl1:;; :s
Gl 1-0 00 0 00 00 00 00 818 00 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 ...I
> 00 0 00 ~O 00 00 O~ 0 0 ~O 0 00 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 O~ 00 0 00 w
0 O~ 0<0 :; ~N "'''' N'" "'~ ~~ ~ a> "" '" '" a> '" "'''' ON ~ ~ ~ ""~ "'N N <0 ~~ 0'" N'" N "'~ 0
Gl <( ~~ ~N N "'~ ~ a> N ~ ~ <0 ~ '" ~ '" ~'" ~<O a> N N ~N N"" ~N ~ a> N ~ ~ '" Ul
'" NN ~ ~ ~ ~N ~ :IE
~ =-: 10~ O~ ""~ f;l~ co; N~ a>o MO ~ 0 <0 ~ <0 "'0 OM 0 ~ lD ~<O M <0 <00 "'''' N ;:!~ 0 0'"
t "'"- lD N ~~ CD 0 "'~ ~'" a> a> O~ '" ~~ ~~ q 0 ~ ~I"-: ~~ ~N N~ NN "l "'~
5.5 "":Lri do C\i"": NO NN "":C"'i NtO "":C\i d ..,; MO d "":C'i M"': ~ ,..; N ~ ~ NO -.i"": 0""': N cici ~ trici
::> o~ ~~ ~ Oi-- NN ~~ '" <0 <0 <0 "" '" '" 0 ~~ NN NM M~ ~ ~ ~I~'~ ~'" ~~ ~I~ ON ~~ "" '"
0 .., '" '" ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~'" ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ lD lD lD lD <0 CD
0 0..'"
.., U"'O ~<O ~ ''It LnIQ) ~~ ~~ """" ;blll 10 <0 ~~ ~I;b ~~ a> M <0 "" 0 ~ <0 N <0 ~ a>o ;b:& N'" 0 ~'"
0 ~~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ <o~ <o~ ~ ~ <0 <0 <o~ ~~ ~<O ~~ <0 ~~
0 o V1lO
N "= "- 1.= 1::'iij
~):E J~L~ 1:: 'iij '", '", g -c]! :g~ 'm'm 'm 1:: "iij "iij 'iij '", slg '" 1:: "", "", "iij 1:: m:2 "a-c!g -e!g 5:2 S-c
,g1:S e CO e c:c :S~ e e co- co- e 0- 0 e e -10
00'" C!C ~ .~ ~.~ ~.S .50 ~ .5 .5.c .-.- c "- c: t:1'-
f- 0 ::;;.<= .<= 1-::;; :;;::;;,'iij ::;; ,- t5::;; 'iij!::;;
~Nt- 'iiji'iij U) '" 'iij 'iij ...I Ul '(ij'(ij "'en 'n; 'iij '" '" "'...J 'n; Ul '" Ul 'iij 'iij "'Ul '"
):~ 0:10: ;:) ::> 0::0: 0: ::>0: 0:0: 0.: 0:0: 0:0: ::> 0: 0:::> ::>0 00: o:c 0: C ::> ::> 0: C 0:0 CO 0::0: ::>0 0: 0::0
o <II ...1...1...1 ...J c:::llc:::l ...I ...1...1 ...I ...I ...I ...1...1 ...1...1 ...I ...I ...1...1 ...I ...I ...I ...I ...1...1 ...I ...I ...I ...I ...I ...I ...I ...I ...1...1 ...1...1 ...I ...I ...I ...I ...I
NO NN,"" N N ~~ NN . NN N'<t N ~ NN ~~ ~N N~ N ~ ~ N N . N~ CD~ ~N ~<O ~ N~
~ ",I",!~I", """""'i~OI"'I~i'" "'''' "'0 <0 '" "'''' ~ mo)'~CDIC"') '" N '" "'''' co m_olll) ~ ~I~ '" 010 '" 0
>- ~'~IOI~ ~:~'ii~!~I~ ~o ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~!~'f-I~IO ~ 0 ~ ~~ Cl~..-O ''It ......1...... ~~
00 0'0 0 0 ~I~ ~ 0 0 0 00 01010,:5: .~ ~I~ ~ ~i~ 00
Ii) N:~ 21~!~!~~r~ I~ ~In ~ NN N!N N N ~'~io~;~ N N N NIN N NINI N N f-
! 1 I lien! I I~I 1.11 I '~"II~ en I U
W
J I ""'"~ I~ N Ia> 'iii ..,
M ~ I,.... N; Q)I r---I j<O ~ I"'~I 10 '13 o(l~ 0 '"
~ NI",!~ ~I i!!, ~i"'lo(l'" ~ ~ "" I"" 0: N
0", en. I ~ ~~Ni", ~IO( N ~ ~ ~ Q,) "'-,V) ~ ~
I- J:I "'!ol~ J: '" J:1J:i ~ dJ:'= J: ~IJ:,J: ~1~I:ili~l~i~lg EI:& ~!.<= l1. ....:
J: J:!J:;J:IJ:U! ~'J:J: ~ "'I~ ;b~ Z
<( '-1'.""'Tq> <C - <('<(I 1<( <c '''It'<(i<C 0( <(<(:<(,o(i~'~1 i11fio( E 1'5 en
enlliliJ:IJ:len = ~Ir! ~'3ienl~len J:I"3iF VJVJVJVJIVJ'_I~,VJIVJ ~,VJ ::r:'U)::r:iL1.IVJIJ:1..J o Oji"3l 0 C:'en 0: en 0 ~
U,ZI-IfC'iU xC) OjO 0 UI~ U l-iU U uu,U'U,U!o:,_:uu ~IU U E:IUI-IWiU....:liD U u'C)en ~!u UIC) i= c:
I"~: i Ii: I I II! :! ! I 1 !,~i I i I l~1 I i~i I I~I ill, ";If" U N
~I~ ::> 0
0:: -c
I...J! I :' ico' I 1 ,I I I...JI 100 I t:r. 0 : ,~ ' : I 'co Cf.l ,J:I~ f- 0
E 12;-: ,I !.....I""': I I "It' N M <('M: : >J I:I_j . c: ..:1""(1")1 cal I : 01 '......1 0 ,f-'
e 'c: 'NI' I, I~'~' ~ 0( ~ N a> '" N lei~' g,..J' '" col~I~'el '~'Z ~ ~I I", ~ iz:(f.) en U
Z
u.. ~' 50( 0 0 ~ "',~ <0 ~IJ:'J:!~ J: ~ .<= J: J:IJ: ~ J: '::>,'" :;;:'.<='~ "'I""J:IJ:' 0 ~ J:~ oJOIJ:I~' E J: "",'-iu 0 ~
...... _..- ...... <0 CO:"'lt l.C)......I<('<( to <( ~ _ <( <( <( E <( oq- 01 L.. OI_laJ ro c1c( <( L..loq- <(' Q) --:<(ICOI 0 <( ~I E,w C) Ui
~UI~I~ II ~ II~IIloo'WI~WII mOO WOO roW mu,~;~IO:~ ~ wjoo OO~IXIW:~~WI~,~ c:
cnO::INlm W 0
U'~ ""U f-f-U f-U1f-uIU'U U f- ~UUIC) J:'U <Oenlo( CO'~IUo..IW U'C)~'I-'U,ZUU'U'W uu'"':l~ 0:: Sl
Ii' ~ I I 1 1 1 ",, 'II!" I Iii 'ii n .,
: ! : Il"), ~<o1 I il,! '. ': :<o:!! : r ! ! :N! : Ii! e
'~'1l")1 ~- , oq-__:co N!.....! oq-I I..... __ ' N:' I__:N:!..... :N: M:__,M: I : -- col 1-- I I Q)
E
_ M:oq- 5:2_ MN:'l""":N 1l"):__:1l") N~ ''l''''" M m: U)"1l") 'l""" 'l""",'l""":N_m' 'l"""IN: :M: 'l""":'l""";Nj.....! i't"'" Il") .....:It)I'l''''" I ::>
m .....-0 Z,O X 'l""" ~IIiI II~~-I'.....,I I I MI:oI I'I,II:m.I,~ MmI,coI:IiI'Ilco'I II:I'I ,
, "
:; ~ ~ <( ~ <( <O.~ <( <('<( <(<(: <( No( 0( <( <0 <( ~ <( <(<(<( <(~o(i .~ a>'<(<o <( <(<( <('~I<( 0( <(.<(,<( 0
o ~ c::: en c::: en c::: ~ enenVJ 00 OO:VJ 00 0::'00 Cf) 00 c::: CI) 0:: CI) Cf)'OO:Cf):OOC:::OOVJ c::: 0:: VJ:C::: OO!VJ 00 VJ:O::'Cf.lrcn oo'Cf) cn 0
0: U U U U U U U UUU U U U U U U U U U U U U UU C) U U U,U U U U.U UU U U,U C),U U,C)U 6
, ~ '0 'l"""'N:("),oq-"1l") (0:..... romo 'l""" N (")~lt);<o~:co'm 0 'l"""N M V'lt)'CO .....lco'~:a'l"""''t'''":N - <;>
o ,Q
0..0: 'l""",N M v It) <0 ..... co m 'l""" 'l""" 'l"""!..... 'l""" 'l""" 'l"""''l''''" 'l""" 'l""" N N N N N NN N N,N CO') M M:M M'M M M M M,~ V ~:oq- - 8 - 0
N
U .2 : m N C')' :'l""" Il"):CO"'" co o-~ ..... oq- Il") 'l""" co <O'N aco'v:NMm 'CO'MCO 0 ilt)"c'm'l"""coco 9
0;' LO,CO 'l"""'l"""N__ M v,N,.....,'l""":'l""":NN M:NM 'l"""'l""" M N (,,)M'l""" ~.m,'l""" NiM:M:MjCO''l''''":N:N('') :N 't"'"iN M NN ti
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
---.---.--.---.---.-------.-.--..--.-
CSAH I .05 S OF RICE CK WAY TO CRAIG WAY 2049 0
CSAH I S CR CITY LMTS TO 93RD LN 2049 0
CSAH I RIESLING TO CSAH 7 2049 2,212,123
. CSAH I S CIY LINE TO FAI694 2049 0
CSAH I F AI 694 TO 0.05 S OF RICE CK. WAY 2049 0
.
CSAH I 84TII A VB TO RICKARD RD 2049
CSAH 2 CSAH I TO CR 102 (MAIN ST) 2049 0
.. CSAH 2 C.R 102 TO TII 47 2049 0
CSAH 2 TII 47 TO TII 65 2049 0
CSAH 2 TII 65 TO E CIY LINE 2049 0
CSAH 3 TII 10 TO TII47 2049 0
C.R. 3 CSAH 1 TO TII 47 2049 0
CSAH 4 TII 65 TO CSAH 2 2049 0
CSAH 4 TII 47 TO TII 65 2049 0
CSAH 5 N JCf CR 63 TO CSAH 22 2049 0
CSAH 5 CSAH 22 TO CSAH 24 2049 0
CSAH 5 TII 47 TO N JCf CR 63 2049 0
CSAH 6 TII 65 TO CSAH 35 2049 0
CSAH 6 CSAH 1 TO 0.37 MI EAST 2049 0
CSAH 6 0.37 MI EAST OF CSAH 1 TO 5th ST 2049 0
CSAH 6 5th STNE TOTII 65 2049 0
CSAH 6 CSAH 35 TO EAST COUNTY LINE 2049 0
CSAH 7 CSAH 14 TO S. TII 10 RAMP 2049 1,310,999
- CR 27 TO CSAH 22 2049 0
CSAH 7
CSAH 7 02-607-16 S. TII 10 RAMP TO GRANT (TII 288) 2049 0
:
CSAH 7 GRANT ST TO 141ST 2049 0
CSAH 7 CR58 TOCR27 2049 0
CSAH 8 MAIN ST TO TII 47 2049 655,499
~hursday~August23, 2001" ~:~' o^ . '." d. .,":' o^ " "'~-"~"''i'",<=,""'' --, --"". ~. ?^:'W'N '$ . ~.' Page;~; , i
. . ,"~. '.~~M "' ~;rs ,> "" "'..-~
Project Description Year I:ngineers City
Number Estimate Costs
---- ------.-.---
CSAH 8 TH 65 TO CSAH 35 2049 400,000
CSAH 8 TH47 TOTH 65 2049 0
CSAH 8 CSAH 1 TO MAIN 2049 0
CSAH 8 CSAH 35 TO EAST CTY LINE 2049 631,843 .
CSAH 9 CSAH 116 TO .39 MI. NORTH 2049 0
.
CSAH 9 N Jcr 20 TO N. ANDOVER CITY LIMITS 2049 2,560,577
CSAH 9 S. OAK GROVE LIMITS TO 1.5 M NORTH 2049 1,600,361
.. CSAH 9 1.5 M N. OF ANDOVER TO 3.5 M N. 2049 2,133,814
CSAH 9 3.5 M N. TO 4.6 M N. OF ANDOVER 2049 1,173,598
CSAH 9 4.6 M N. OF ANDOVER TO CSAH 24 2049 1,813,742
CSAH 9 CSAH 14 TO CSAH 116 2049 0
CSAH 10 CSAH 49 TO CSAH 21 2049 0
C.R. 10 CR 53 TO .2M SO. OF CSAH 23 2049 0
CSAH 11 TH 10 TO CSAH 12 (NORTHDALE) 2049 0
CSAH 11 RA YEN ST TO CSAH 18 2049 : ,152,814
CSAH 11 CSAH 1 TOTH 10 2049 0
CSAH 12 CSAH 51 TO TH 65 2049
CSAH 12 FOLEY TO CSAH 51 (UNIVERSITY) 2049
CSAH 12 832' W OF TH 65 TO 950'E OF TH 65 2049 0
CSAH 12 CSAH/CR 52 TO CSAH 17 2049 0
CSAH 12 CR 53 TO CSAH 153 LILAC DR 2049 0
CSAH 13 CSAH 22 TO CR 103 2049 3,823,970
CSAH 13 CR 103 TO CSAH 24 2049 1,699,542
CSAH 14 CSAH 23 TO I.35W 2049 0 . .
CSAH 14 CSAH 1 TO 10 ST 2049 1.966,498
:
CSAH 14 10th ST TO CSAH 9 2049 0
CSAH 14 CSAH 17 TO CSAH 23 2049 0
CSAH 14 TH65 TOCSAH 17 2049 0
Thursday"August23,,2001 ,;,' ; : '", "-;.-- ~'-, "'-'^,',:b :'t.'~"W~H..,.. .:~<-....- f ;;~,\ ,,;<,~~ ~'~':~~t; t~~d) PageilO:(\~ ::1
. . ~ < ...'" ."" ..., ~~" " , ~. M' ~.,'~,<-' - "''i.". "~ ~t...:;'.<;:je~~
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
-.................-.-.---..-------.....-..--.-.----------............----~--_..__._.__..._--_.._-_..,....._.._.._.__.._......._.._---------_.-..,...........-.- . .. ...................--.....-.........--....-.......-
C.R. 15 CSAH 22 TO 213th AVE 2049 2,379,359
C.R. 15 217thAVE TO 229thAVE 2049 1,274,657
CSAH 16 CSAH #78 TO T.H. 65 2049 3,144,153
. .
CSAH 17 NORTH ROAD TO I-35W 2049
C.R. 18 CSAH 116 TO ANDOVER BLVD 2049 0
. .
CSAH 18 CSAH 19 TO EAST cry LINE 2049 2,549,313
CSAH .18 N JCf CSAH 17 TO CSAH 19 2049 0
- CSAH 18 S JCf CSAH 17 TO N JCT CSAH 17 2049 0
CSAH 18 CSAH I TO CSAH 11 NORTHDALE 2049 0
CSAH 18 CSAH 20 TO TH 65 2049 0
CSAH 18 TH 242 TO CSAH 116 (BUNKER) 2049 0
C.R. 18 HANSON BLVD TO CSAH 20 2049 1,444,611
CSAH 18 TH 65 TO CSAH 17 2049 0
CSAH 19 CSAH 18 TO CSAH 23 2049 2,549,313
CSAH 20 CSAH 9 TO CSAH 18 2049 0
CSAH 20 CSAH 7 TO CSAH 9 2049 0
CSAH 21 C.R. 140 TO CSAH 23 2049 3,229,130
CSAH 21 CSAH 14 TO CR 140 (80th AVE) 2049 1,954,473
CSAH 22 TH 47 TO CSAH 9 2049 0
CSAH 22 CSAH 5 TO TH 47 2049 0
CSAH 22 OLD CSAH 26 TO EAST COUNTY LINE 2049 0
CSAH 22 WEST LIMITS LINWOOD TO OLD CSAH 2049 0
26
CSAH 22 TH 65 TO EAST LIMITS OF EAST BETHE 2049 0
.
.
CSAH 22 CSAH 9 TO CR 67 2049 0
. CSAH 22 E JCT CR 67 TO TH 65 2049 0
-
CSAH 24 CSAH 28 TO TH 65 2049 6,203,328
CSAH 24 TH 65 TO CR 76 2049 2,719,267
Thursday; August 23. 2001 7~,~; , ,- , 3 ,:.:"'. ,.' ,,;., A~'i': ~:, ""'t ~~ ~+ .'t' r_~,y"..,~,~~:'\;,y_t~tf-~;mt;;:Pag~<~Jk!:.: t'" t
,~ <C ~ ";V~ J. ....,,~ ~~~~ _ ~..-'W~ ""~>
Project Description Year I::nglneers City
Number Estimate Costs
~-------------------------------------------~ ------- - --------... - - - - .....-...-----
CSAH 24 TIl47 TO WEST COUNTY LINE 2049 6,203,328
CSAH 26 CSAH 24 TO CR 15 2049 2,974,199
CSAH 26 CR 15 TO CSAH/CR 85 2049 2,719,267
C.R. 27 CR 7 TO TII 47 2049 0 -
CSAH 28 TIl47 TO NORTII COUNTY LINE 2049 3,993,924
.
CSAH 28 CSAH 24 TO TIl47 2049 0
CSHA 31 MAIN ST TO GRANT ST 2049 0
.. CSAH 32 BALTIMORE ST TO W FRTGE RD I-35W 2049 0
CSAH 32 CSAH 23 TO .3 M E OF W LMT CIR.PINE 2049 0
CSAH 35 02-635-07 N LEG CSAH 6 TO TII 65 2049 2,949,497
CSAH 35 N LEG CSAH 6 TO N LEG CSAH 8 2049 2,161,527
CSAH 51 97th AVE TO 11 Oth U.. N 2049 0
CSAH 51 92nd AVE TO 97th AVE 2049 0
CSAH 52 HAMLINE TO CSAH ] 7 2049 0
C.R. 53 CR 10 TO CSAH 12 2049 0
C.R. 53 CSAH 12TOCSAH 14 2049 2,066,434
C,R. 54 S. CIY LINE TO CSAH 14 2049 2,464,336
c.R. 56 TIlIO TO CSAH 5 2049 0
C.R. 57 CSAH 116 TO CSAH 5 2049 0
c.R. 59 CSAH 20 TO CR 58 2049 2,039,450
C.R. 60 TII 65 TO CSAH 17 2049 0
C.R. 60 87-06-60 TII 65 TO CSAH 20 2049 1,699,542
c.R. 61 TII 65 TO CR 52 2049 849,771
C.R. 61 CR 52 TO CR 60 2049 1,529,588 -
-
C.R. 62 CSAH 18 TO EAST CO LINE 2049 1,274,657
-
c.R. 62 CSAH 23 TO CSAH 18 2049 2,974,199
C.R. 63 CSAH 5 TO TII 47 2049 934,748
c.R. 63 CSAH 5 TO CSAH 83 2049 2,549,313
Thursday"August23, 2001., >,: " . " .' , " . .' ' -, - . ., .,'. '~;' ,..".cl+'>1:<i "lI' d'Pagei12;t;:' n
". '" c". '" ,,'" ~ ~ ~, . "'"j "'''lf~''l~: rA f ,"" '" >>Ji<,>'{l:,~~:r&:,",*
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
...... ----.--.-........---.--.-.---..---..--- - _.~.._..._... .-....-...- ... .. ......-..-...-..-.-....--......--.-...-...........---..-.--- .. -...-....---..--....-..,--..............-.
C.R. 65 CSAH 22 TO CSAH 5 2049 1,529,588
C.R. 66 CSAH 24 TO TH 47 2049 3,823,970
C.R. 67 CR 58 TO CSAH 22 2049 1,274,657
C.R. 68 CSAH 18 TO CSAH 22 2049 2,379,359
C.R. 69 CR 70 TO CSAH 24 2049 934,748
. .
C.R. 70 CSAH 24 TO CSAH 28 2049 4,588,763
C.R. 71 NORTH CO LINE TO CSAH 24 2049 1,954,473
. C.R. 72 CSAH 24 TO CSAH 24 2049 3,059,176
C.R. 73 NORTH CO LINE TO CSAH 24 2049 3,277,497
C.R. 74 65 TO 217th AVE 2049 4,163,878
C.R. 74 DURANT ST TO CSAH 22 2049 1,954,473
C.R. 74 CSAH 13 TO TH 65 2049 2,039,450
C.R. 75 CSAH 22 TO CR 77 2049 2,379,359
C.R. 76 CSAH 24 TO CSAH 36 2049 5,948,397
C.R. 77 CR 75 TO CSAH 36 2049 1,699,542
CSAH 78 CSAH 20 TO CR 58 2049 0
C.R. 79 CSAH 9 TO 1900 FT SOUTHWEST 2049 0
C.R. 81 CSAH 28 TO TH 47 2049 1,019,725
C.R. 82 WEST CO LINE TO CR 65 2049 764,794
CSAH 83 TH 10TO 161stAVE 2049 0
CSAH 83 161stTO 173rd (CR63) 2049 0
C.R. 84 SOUTH CO LINE TO CSAH 14 2049 2,549,313
C.R. 85 CSAH 26 TO CR 76 2049 0
.
CSAH 85 CSAH 22 TO CSAH 26 2049 0
. C.R. 86 CSAH 13 TO TH 65 2049 0
.
C.R. 87 TH 65 TO CSAH 52 2049 0
C.R. 102 44th AVE TO 1-694 2049 0
C.R. 102 1-694 TO 57th AVE 2049 344,406
Thursda~ Auoust 23 2001, ,,~... . ".d ?'-' ..- .~~.k."""'''.~.<'';y'~.i\'!it~m~. -_.-~.s.-fag~]:J';..~
". b 't' ,. "l~'..../,.>"'~,.~~,, {<qt"':;~"''tI~'''ltl-<''''ti:'i. .~"'~ ~ > >&-,"'''' ""s'H"--"~~F .fth"t:'t:;'$~ Ii ~
_. ,....,. ,'~ , ~. '_>~ ",,"I, 'l ,.,,~, ",';K ;, 4 'l,~"'~"!A"y~~^4 """ *~.
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
C.R. 102 MAIN ST. TO .I MILES WEST 2049 0
C.R. 103 CSAH 24 TO CSAH 13 2049 1,274,657
C.R. 104 CR 102 TO TH 47 2049 0
C.R. 106 CSAH 35 TO EAST CO LINE 2049 0 .
C.R. 108 CSAH 35 TO EAST CO LINE 2049 0
. .
C.R. 110 99.07-110 CSAH 17 TO 0.3 EAST 2049 344,406
CSAH 116 CSAH 9 TO CSAH 78 2049
. CSAH 116 0.11 M W OF TH 47 TO CSAH 7 2049 0
CSAH 116 CSAH 9 TO .15 M EAST OF CSAH 9 2049 0
CSAH 116 CSAH 7 TO CSAH 9 2049 0
C.R. 116 CR 56 TO CSAH 83 2049
C.R. 153 CR 53 TO CSAH 153 2049 849,771
C.R. 154 CSAH 21 TO CR 54 2049 679,817
C.R. 158 CSAH7TOCR58 2049 509,863
C.R. 163 CSAH 22 TO CSAH 5 2049 2,124,428
* * SubTotal * * 141,435,268
i
.
-
:IhutSda.:y; :t\ugustYl;2011J.;.~~"~m.~,,,,,,li:(t";~;:'~~r~~~~~ii\Y"liil..i~h~tIif.~:"'; "*"c ~
"'",""'~A~"''''''-> ~~.".."" ...........q; ",....~ ;y1': t:a~ /I::'~!J~ ____~~~"-~$;i i~."I'" ~.~ ;'1, 'f,,~ ,..-;.e>:"";..~.;,1~!~l,, . . .,' "
.
- .
. PART 2
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
.
:
" - 15 -
Introduction to Part 2 Reconstruction Proiects
.
Part 2 consists of individual listings for the years 2001-2006 and constitutes the Five Year Highway
Improvement Plan. You will note that in each of the years 2001-2006, funds have been set aside for
. bridge maintenance, cold inplace recycling, crack filling, and overlay project. These funds essentially
will be used to maintain the routes listed in Part 1 and Part 3 of this document. The projected spending
for 2001-2006 is essentially balanced. Note that the Plan utilizes funds not yet secured to achieve this
balance. Anoka County has an aggressive posture as it relates to obtaining outside funds. The issuance of
bonds may be used to allow the construction of some major projects, which include interchange
.. improvements, and rail grade separations that are included in the last years of the Plan. Without
additional outside funding, many of these projects will slide to later years of the program.
.
-
-
- 17 -
Anoka County
2001 - 2006
. .
- . CSAH 26
CR74 :'?
CR 66
BURNS LINWOOD
TOWNSHIP ~ TOWNSHIP
~ OAK ~
~ GROVE :J:
0: ....
u
COLUMBUS
TOWNSHIP
CR 58
CSAH 18
m
C> ~
~ :J:
0: 0(
U "'
u C>
CR 60 -
HAM LAKE
CR61
FIVE YEAR PLAN
. 0 2001
. 2002 N
. 2003 W*E
- .
. 2004
0 2005
2006 s
.
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
- 19 -
Anoka County
2001
- .
~CR 74 . .
CR 86
~
OAK G
GROVE l:
...
.
COLUMBUS
TOWNSHIP
CR61
02-607-17
02-609-11
02-611-28
02-610-11 02-617-17
02-617-05
.
.
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
N
N Construction W.E
N Reconditioning
s
- 20 -
'" Anoka County Highway Department ,
. Five Year Plan
',' '! , ' , ., '^
"
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
C.W. 0 01-02-00 2001 CRACK FILLING 2001 105,000
. -
C.W. 0 01-01-00 2001 OVERLAYS 2001 525,000
. C.W. 0 SIGNAL PAINTING 2001 2001 60,000
C.W. 0 01-03-00 2001 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2001 50,000
C.W. 0 01-04-00 2001 SIGNALS UNASSIGNED (4) 2001 0
. CSAH 7 02-607-17 SIGNAL & CHANN AT 157th 291.2KFE 2001 645,000
CSAH 9 01-07-09 RECONDITION 149th AVE TO CSAH 22 2001 1,275,000
CSAH 9 02-609-11 SIGNAL & CHANN AT 161ST 136K FED 2001 696,000
CSAH 10 002-610-12 EAST COUNTY LINE TO TH 47 2001 2,281,250
CSAH II 02-611-28 SIGNAL & CHANN AT EGRET 348K FED 2001 650,000
CSAH 17 02-617-17 CSAH 23 (LAKE DR) TO CR 10 NORTH 2001 1,540,000
RD $1,232,000 Fed
CSAH 17 02-617-05 CSAH #32 TO CSAH 23 (LAKE DR) 2001 3,015,000
CSAH 18 02-618-24 BRIDGE NO 02549 APPROACH REPAIR 2001 129,000
CSAH 35 02-635-09 8151 AVE TO TH 10 FT RD $400K FED 2001 1,000,000
CSAH 52 02-652-01 CSAH 12 TO CSAH 14 (MAIN S1) 2001 4,900,000
* * SubTotal * * 16,871,250
PREVIOUS BALANCE $ -1.182.797
ANTICIPATED BUDGET $ 6,862,867
FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 4,356,010
FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $
STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED $
STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $
TURNBACK FUNDS OBLIGATED $
. TURN BACK FUNDS REQUESTED $
CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED $ 2,305,669
AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS ANTICIPATED-$
: OTHER FUNDS ANTICIPATED Bonds $ 4,SOO,OOO
ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE $- 29,501
- 21 -
WednesdanAu(JustOlt..200),;:~"K-""'f""~",h:"'",;,, "_"''''~',_v~. ",* ,,,"'~,. '.-' ' -rl-_~:;:'~~,"-;' P4:1~C:.t 0(;'1
~ ..-z-.,;"'..L"'~1<--'; .......,1:1'". _.. _ ,,'..~ \ " , .. . t~ , "'" r. ^<" .~ < T _ ,.' . ~~..'" ,..",
Anoka County
2002
..
-
CR74 .
CRee
UNlMJOD
~ TOWNSHIP
OAK ~
GROVE :I:
>-
.
COLUMBUS
TOWNSHIP
CR S8
CSAH 18
~
eRe1
N
~
02-678-13
02-596-004
02-652-02
02-652-03
02-652-04
-
:
COI.UMlJ/A HEIGHTS N
N Construction W*E
N Reconditioning
- 22 - S
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
--
C.W. 0 02-01-00 2002 OVERLAYS 2002 1,000,000
C.W. 0 02-05-00 2002 SIGNALS (4 UNASSIGNED) 2002 200,000
C.W. 0 02-04-00 2002 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2002 50,000
.
C.W. 0 02-02-00 2002 CRACK. SEALING 2002 105,000
- . CSAH 1 IN FRIDLEY (RECONDmON) 2002 800,000
CSAH 10 02-610-10 SIGNAL AT TH 49 200K TURNBACK. 2002 250,000
CSAH 49 02-649-002 S CO. LINE TO CSAH 23 S504M TURNBK 2002 5,400,000 Lino Lakes
$500,00
. CSAH 49 02-649-0 I BRIDGE AT RICE CK. S1.8M TURNBACK. 2002 2,000,000 Ramsey County
$100,000
CSAH 52 02-652-0 I PARK AND RIDE LOT (S3.3 M MTC) 2002 2,300,000 Blaine
$1,200,000
CSAH 52 02-652.03 INTERCHANGE AT 35W TO HAMLINE 2002 5,350,000
204M State
CSAH 52 02-652-04 .28 M E OF 10lst TO 95TH AVE 2002 900,000
CSAH 52 02-652-02 CSAH 12 TO 0.28 MLS EAST OF 10lst 2002 2,750,000
CSAH 78 02-678-13 INTERSECTION AT CR 18 400K FED 2002 800,000 Andover
$80,000
T.H. 242 02-596-004 ACCESS MANAGEMENT SO.96 FED 2002 1,200,000 Coon Rapids
$80,000
T.H. 242 THRUSH TO CRAIN 2002 330,000
330K Turnback
* * SubTotal * * 23,435,000
PREVIOUS BALANCE $ - 29,501
ANTICIPATED BUDGET $ 6,589,665 Budget &; CIP
FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 1,336,000
FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $
STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 2,400,000
STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $
TURNBACK FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 7,400,000
TURNBACK FUNDS REQUESTED $ 330,000
CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED $ 1.860.000
AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS ANTICIPATED-$ 100,000
OTHER FUNDS ANTICIPATED mt: $ 3,300,000
.
ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE $ - 148,836
.
-
- 23 -
\Vednesdas:~ust08; 2001';;~$~';'./~i~;r;"'.' 3'\ '" 1.'~.b1j.;;~~k~ ~~~l~~I;;t:.f~-.:1.\k~l-;""'.,,~<~)-:-k~~~\'l., ~>1~ F:t~ft~i~LlI
__ '4"'-~"~ hy...~ _""''!F'''- ?;...~.-" "."YI""II-"" ~ _.;,.;~~~-~."'.... -'_......;-~..,'t,..,.. ~.,. \-0;, ..-~ '!;:..;r.. ~~,;."'""i-' ~"""~lI..-~''';;o'>~'~ .~.:>-1':i'
Anoka County
2003
SAINT FRANCIS ~~;;:/ L~;t .-l '-076 ill I
~ CS~28 If I'"sAu.,f<-"; 1 ~ / .... ;\
;JY ~.. -UI; ..I If ~
I ~l CSAH24 r.Rl03 CSAH28 ~ r'
CR70 1.. U I '-Ie: '"
CR70~ -..- CSAH24 / J? CR74 EAST BETHEL ~ lJ ~
~ -/ .~5 yo.
- '1<1
~ CRM ~
BURNS ~ - CS4.H.22
CR .2 TOWNSHIP; ( ~ I '" LINWOOD
-""-"i is ~/, OAK <0 ~ TOWNSHIP
..1..l:ae5 5 ~~ GROVE i!:-
. ~
CSAH" /'l 1..<
l:j !f ) '.h CSAH22 J . ~
~ 3 CR84 ~ Y ~ CRse ~ ( J ~g~~y~
\ CR.3 :.~ ~CR' ): (
CR 83 r- 'I K. \.!;, 5 m l!! /' CSAH ,. ~ CSAH ,.
~SEY f ~ CR.t 5 ~ .1/ -- d
:l" 7 0 r CRBO !!! c,~6I-.
" ~ CSAH20 ~
~ ~ ~~':. ANDOVER /J CR.' HAM LAKE rCSAH2~./.
V$ lJ ...'\"\ J
70 C-'.51 \; ~ ~ CR1. ~ :l IV
_ ~ ~CSAH\, 71 a: 16 ~
,~...J NOKA ~ /.... CSAH ,. lJ ~ /1/
- / /
CR(.: Ai.
s~~ '-- ("",., ~
CSAH14 '- ~ ~
~c:.~ ,. ~ \ \ BLAINE ~ Ie - / /' ~
~ :l:V' ........ l3 J'f> ~ I ~ CR 153 / ~ l3 \(j
.1 lJ'~'ff-
02-609-12 ~~:Slj~'O l CSAH12::;::otc ,/ ~RV/UE
APfDS ~R87 ~ _oV CSA ~
is .1/ ~R} 1- L1NOLAKES ;1;] )
I-.. ... i!: 'f~" CSAH10 -E ~
T.H. 242 ~ ~ ~ .y T~TJ ~ "'" '\.... ~ let
CRANE TO THRUSH \ CR ~ ,,~ W(/N~;;; L I ~ ,,~ ,........{ )
~ SPRINo-,~ ~
LAKE ~'"
PARK
, CS H8
o 02-617-12
02-601-040 ~ t 02-610-11 02-617-13
RIDLE -
'694 .
--.,; -
OSA> ,--
~ m:,.
~2/ :
/ N
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS w~ E
N Construction T
s
- 24 -
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
---
C.W. 0 03-01-00 2003 OVERLAYS 2003 1,000,000
C.W. 0 03-04-00 2003 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2003 50,000
C.W. 0 03-03-00 2003 COLD INPLACE RECYCLING 2003 800,000
.
C.W. 0 03-02-00 2003 CRACK SEALING 2003 105,000
. C.W. 0 03-05-00 2003 SIGNAL SYSTEMS (4) 2003 200,000
CSAH 1 02-601-040 INTERSECTION REPL. @ EGRET 2003 500,000
$O.4MHES
CSAH 9 02-609-12 0.39 M. NOF CR 116 -149thAVE 2003 2,457,914 Andover
.. $245,000
~AH 10 02-610-011 REPL. SIGNAL @ CSAH 3/51/10 SO.4M 2003 500,000
CSAH 11 02-611-29 HANSON INTERCHANGE WITH TH 10 2003 1,000,000 Coon Rapids
DFJRW $250,000
CSAH 17 02-617-12 PHEASENT RIDGE TO 1000'N OF CSAH 2003 1,474,748 Blaine
12 $O.979M Fed $147,000
CSAH 17 02-617-13 CSAH 14TO 1000FTN.OFCSAH 12 2003 2,000,000 Blaine
$1. 328M Fed $200,000
CSAH 23 CSAH 49 TO I-35W PE,DE,RIW 600K TU 2003 600,000
T.H. 242 THRUSH TO CRAIN 2003 3,630,000
$3.63Il 'furnback
T.H. 242 CRAIN TO ULYSSES 2003 970,000
$776K Turnback
* * SubTotal * * 15,287,662
PREVIOUS BALANCE $ - 148,836
ANTICIPATED BUDGET $ 6,481,298 Budget & CIP
FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 3,107,200
FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $
STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED $
STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $
TURNBACK FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 600.000
TURNBACK FUNDS REQUESTED $ 4.406 ,()()()
CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED $ 842 . ()()()
AJOINiNG COUNTY FUNDS ANTICIPATED-$
OTHER FUNDS ANTICIPATED $
. .
ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE $ -0-
,
- 25 -
~Vedn daY"~ustOll:-200~'"'b.~.._.~, ~.~" '-.'" . "'.',,,,,~ ,,;' :....~, .'"..""~~m,";...,...ftl:.'''.e''Ge:z,,p/l'
~t"('';. ,~_ ,Ot.;, ~ ~r?f", ~~'1f~~-t~~t!;v~!~e;~""~,1,!.I..<-{~<""t~~t.~~~>>;l~:::-W~-:~:~~ry~,:\'Jift _ ~:~~~;'w::l.~";}a~:.:;~~
Anoka County
2004
.
CR74 - -
:! CR ..
~ ~
OAK '"
GROVE :l:
....
.
COLUMBUS
TOWNSHIP
eR61
02-716-007
02-716-006
T.H. 242
CRANE TO ULYSSES
02-596-003
02-623-04 o.
.
COI./1M/1/A HEIGHTS N
N Construction W*E
s
- 26 -
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
---.-_0..-
C.W. 0 04-01-00 2004 OVERLAYS 2004 1,000,000
C.W. 0 04-02-00 2004 CRACK SEALING 2004 105,000
C.W. 0 04-04-00 2004 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2004 50,000
- .
C.W. 0 04-03-00 2004 COLD INPLACE RECYCLING 2004 800,000
- . C.W. 0 04-05-00 2004 SIGNALS 2004 220,000
CSAH 9 02-609-013 INTERSECTION @ 15?TIf SO.32M HES 2004 800,000
CSAH II 02-611-29 HANSON INTERCHANGE WlTI:I TH 10 2004 1,500,000 Coon Rapids
$500 , 000
.. CSAH 14 02-614-023 EAST CO LINE TO I35E 0.85M FED 2004 1,060,000 ,
C.R. 16 02-596-003 SIGNAL AT TH 65$0.4M HES 2004 500,000
CSAH 17 02-617-15 CSAH 14 TO I 49TH AVE 2004 3,307,412 Blaine $100,000
Ham lake $200, ()()(
CSAH 23 02-623-014 INTERSECTION @ CR 105 SO.36M HES 2004 600,000
CSAH 23 CSAH 49 TO I-35W DE,RIW, 600K TURNB 2004 600,000
CSAH 116 02-716-007 INTERSECfION @ THURSTON SO.4M 2004 500,000 Moka $75,000
HES Ramsey $75,000
CSAH 116 02-716-006 INTERSECTION @ JEFFERSON SO.4M 2004 800,000 Ham lake
HES $150,000
T.H. 242 CRAIN TO ULYSSES 2004 10,670,000 Coon Rapids
$8.536 Turnback $:525 , 000
T.H. 242 RAILROAD SEPERA nON 2004 630,000 ~lfRa~' 000
$106K Turnba.ck, $36K BNSF $112,360
T.H. 242 TH65INTERCHANGE 2004 850,000
.. SubTotal.. $298K Turnback, $425K Mn/Wr
23,992,412
PREVIOUS BALANCE $ -0-
ANTICIPATED BUDGET Levy $ 7,030,887 Budget &; CIP
FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 2,730,000
FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $
STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED $
STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $ 425 , 000
. TURN BACK FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 600 , 000
TURN BACK FUNDS REQUESTED $8,942.730
CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED $ 2,037,360
. -$2,1.90,435
Bonds
OTHER FUNDS ANTlCIPATED~ 36,000
ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE $ -0-
- 27 -
WednesdaYr:Allg.ustO!t;.200L~.~,;;..,,1,: -i,~:1t<~~.".'fu:tBit'.rli.:$,'$;':t~~,;,,;~l.1',!~~~~~~'W; ~ ~~t~~a~~!l1
::;"'" .-.....1 1.,.- ",<1 ...~..... "- i7J -".- " .." ~~' ~ ~-.:". A ~ _':~ ~ , ~"" ll' ~ _. _ ~. l";
Anoka County
2005
SAINT FRANCIS I;; L'" GE;Hb ............."C 7R :<ll
f'..--!!l' CSAH2a e- .o._,r'" 11 i " ;1
~o """ '\>_ 1\ L.1: ~ 1l ~ . -
fY I ~I L CSAH2. "R1n CSAH28 ;;;
.J.. J I
~~ 0
~ CSAH 2' / IT CR" EAST BETHEL ~ IJ r. .
CSAH ~ ,--/ [) ~ IJ
I I J I- "'1
: CR8B ;>.,
BURNS ~ ~ CSAH 22
4Ra2 TOWNSHIP 1: 1l 7 ~ UNWOO~
III , OAK co c TOWNSHIP
. eR" '" ~ GROVE i!: ~
/ 0 I>c
!:ll{ CSAH""~) .h CSAH22 ~ A LJ.J
;; i :\ .. n
:3 iJ' ;: COLUMBUS
CRa. ~ Y ~ CR.a ~ ( TOWNSHIP (
\ CRa, ~ ~ l.9lJ. ) ~
CR a, r-- r< ~ CSAH 1a
"-..... RAMSEY { ~ [;'~ ~ i .00/ ./ CSAH,a ~ d
_ " ~,--CR'8 0 ~ at
'7 CR ao ~ r:J;6J..
j 1 HAM LAKE ~ CSAH 2' J
CR81 f "'--f
~ r---. ~"I CR ,a ....r- r;j IV
_ ......~ '( CSAH\, '" "
. ~ 1N;;;;;;'f CSAH 16 .0 ~ (/f
~~"'"l
~ S~'"" I TH2.2 I / - HZ
1ft ( ,... CSAH,4 /' '!':~~
~ .. ~ ~~ N
'<::!Y S k 0 Y'" ~::l CR ", ~ w
~ -........... 0 t% ~.... 0 ~
~COON \~,o ~ CSAH12 0 ..., "': ICE~RV1LLE ,,-
APIDS 1 "' ISR a7 1.7 l. '--'" C"
~, UNO KES . J [)
~ ~CR10 tn
r-V i!: .) /' j,,- I H 10 -ij ol
02-611-29 ,;' " ........... 1- ~ [~",;n"i~lE n 13 )IJe-
1\ ....,~10 LEXIN 17"';"" ,;:; ,.
11C"~ I"" 0 ,......(
'\- sf:::'.11, ... \
"\,, PARK
"V', CS J
n ~ INTERCHANGE
~ ! ' , CSAH 23 AT 1-35W
~
FR/DL -
r)
'894 .
~ ~ CSAH 2~:, CSAH 49
~ ~ "j- TO J-35W .
J CSA 2
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS N
N. W~E
Construction T
s
- 28 -
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
-------..----.---------.-----------.-.--..-.-.-.-.---.-.-.---..-.---.-
C.W. 0 05-05-00 2005 SIGNALS 2005 220,000
C.W. 0 05-01-00 2005 OVERLAYS 2005 1,000,000
C.W. 0 05-04-00 2005 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2005 50,000
-
C.W. 0 05-02-00 2005 CRACK SEALING 2005 105,000
- C.W. 0 05-03-00 2005 COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING 2005 800,000
CSAH 11 02-611-29 HANSON INTERCHANGE W TH 10 6.96M 2005 10,500,000 Goon Rapids
FED $1,740,000 State - $1,250,000
CSAH 11 02-611-29 HANSON INTERCHANGE WITH TH 10 CS 2005 1,000,000
..
CSAH 23 CSAH 49 TO 1-35W ($3.1M TURNBACK) 2005 3,800,000
CSAH 23 INTERCHANGE WITH 1-35W DESIGN 2005 482,500
CSAH 32 02-632-11 INTERCHANGE WITH 1-35W DESIGN 2005 2,000,000 Ramsey County
$1,000,000
CSAH 78 RAIL GRADE SEPARATION 2005 1,500,000 Coon Rapids
(DESIGN/RW) $500,000
T.H. 242 TH 65 INTERCHANGE 2005 1,850,000
$298K Turnback , $925K State
* * SubTotal * * 23,307,500
PREVIOUS BALANCE $ -0-
ANTICIPATED BUDGET $ 7,534,500 Budget &: CIP
FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED $
FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $ 6,960,000
STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED $
STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $ 2,665,000
TURNBACK FUNDS OBLIGATED $3,100,000
TURNBACK FUNDS REQUESTED $ 298,000
CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED $ 1,750,000
AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS ANTICIPATED-$1. , 000 ,000
OTHER FUNDS ANTICIPATED $
ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE $ -0-
-
-
Anoka County
2006
SAINT FRANCIS ~ CSAH2. tJr ~.sAM,n ~ ~ '-.... r.F:79 < {\ "- _
,,<> I ~ ~.. ~
~ ~ r~
/' i CSAH 2. ~. '" CSAH 2.
~70 I J I 7 EASTBETHa:!! '1 ; -
CSAH2' CR · 3 1 CJ
CSAH 2. ,,-..../ r 1'-
I ~~
~ CR.. - CSAH21
BlJRNS ~ UNWOOD
CRB2 TOWNSHiP ~ OAK ~ I III Il ~y TOWNS~
. ~ ~ " GROV~ F i 1/
/ CSAH" ~ 'l CJl A
1: ) "^ CSAH 22 ) j~
~ i ~~ Y ~"!;l COLUMBUS
~ ~ ~ ro~~
CRB4 CR5B ~ (
\. CR~ ......:.... ~ ..... ) ~ CSAH1.
~CRB3 ~ ~ ~ \..:0 C I!! .. ,/ CSAH1. - L
RAMSEY \ t CR .t ~ ~$J ..
~r:J I r CRBO ~ &;,,?,
l:! Vcs,... 20 ~ CSAH 23
~ III ~~~ ANOOVER vW CR., HAMI..AJ(~ f-
!Is'o"- 3 rn \'''\ r J _ /
- 3 \l<" CR18 " ~
~~ -~ 'I L ~ roSfoli\\B.r- I;
. ~w .UOK;'\' c...... - . .P--
-~-I .A
~~I'" r /f/
~ SAib:' ITH2.2 ....... CSAH,.l ~~
- '--- " IOV' \ 'il>:: N
~r""":b..,, J ~ ,~BlAJN~ 'Ii Cl CF:l!3 ~ ill
T.H. 242 RAIL - 10.{ ~ '\l> lj!! ~ !!
GRADE SEPARATION OON~~'O ~ J CSAH12 ~ V/~ '\1
IOS .., ~ fLLRB7 /'
~ ,UN K~S ;zIt)
ill ~ CR 10 I-Ji fJ
HANSON RAIL SEPARATION F.A! ';;;;:i'~ CSAHl0; I/l
It '\ ~ II""''' L'NI~l . ,
I ...... ~'0 LEXINI.,,;r ~ I
\iR 2'-.. I" t- ~ r-'
INTERCHANGE T.H. 65 AT T.H. 242 sr:~"eG-- \
~, PA~
, il-'~ INTERCHANGE
~ ; 'CSAH 23 AT 1-35W
CSAH12,950' EASTOFTH65TO RIO'" I-
1000' EAST OF CSAH 52
I &of ·
~ CSAH 23, CSAH 49
~ U.TOP TO J-35W
CSAI ;-; I
I INTERCHANGE N
COWMSJAHElGHTS COUNTY ROAD J .
AT 1-35W
W E
N Construction
- 30 - S
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
. ..----------~-------------..-------...----...--,...-..
C.W. 0 06-01-00 2006 OVERLAYS 2006 1,000,000
C.W. 0 06-02-00 2006 CRACK SEALING 2006 105,000
C.W. 0 06-03-00 2006 COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING 2006 800,000
. C.W. 0
06-04-00 2006 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2006 50,000
C.W. 0 04-05-00 2006 SIGNALS 2006 220,000
- -
CSAH 12 950'E/ lli 65 TO 1000' E/ CSAH 52 2006 3,000,000 (a)
CSAH 23 02-623-13 INTERCHANGE WIlli I-35W !.1M 2006 9,000,000 (b)
TURNBAC
. (c)
CSAH 32 INTERCHANGE WIlli I-35W TO CSAH 23 2006 9,000,000
CSAH 78 RAIL GRADE SEPARATION 4.46M F 2006 7,000,000 (d)
T.H. 242 RAILROAD SEPERATION 2006 6,930,000 (e)
T.H. 242 lli 65 INTERCHANGE 2006 18,700,000 (f)
* * SubTotal * * 55,805,000
PREVIOUS BALANCE $ - 0 -
ANTICIPATED BUDGET $ 7,118,452
FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED $
FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $ 16, 860 , 000
CIP $ 3,610,131
STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $ 12,965 , 000
TURNBACK FUNDS OBLIGATED $ 1, 100 ,000
TURNBACK FUNDS REQUESTED $ 7,829,780
CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED $ 5,007 , 310
AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS ANTICIPATED-$ 500,000
OTHER FUNDS ANTICIPATED $ 814,327
ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE $ - 0 -
(a) Blaine $300,000 (d) BNSF $ 425,000
Federal $2,400,000 Coon Rapids $ 500,000
Federal $ 4,460,000
(b) Lino Lakes $ 1,000,000 State $ 1,113,000
Federal $ 4,400,000 (e) BNSF $ 389,327
. State $ 1,100,000 Turnback $ 1,229,780
. Turnback $ 1,100,000
Coon Rapids $ 1,657,310
(c) Ramsey County $ 500,000 (f) Turnback $ 6,600,000
. City $ 1,000,000
. State $ 9,350,000
Federal $ 5,600,000 Blaine $ 550,000
State $ 1,400,000
- 31 -
Thursda~August23 200t~,".~-, " ",' . " ,.~. -' ~---,.' '''*f'' -p'~::-- ;; ~^"-"',"-""''''''*;''>'''~i:'Tr : . ":, ..,- iJ
, __ " , ~ ,. "" 1.. ~~.~;~" ~~- , . ~ "'_ ~ . ~ A~, ~'- '" . ;1,,-< ~"'-''-4T:,"-,p" ,,?,,,,'~1<'fy~,,*~(,
.
.
. PART 3
OTHER PROJECTS
.
~
- 33 -
Introduction to Part 3 Other Proiects
. .
The category "Other Projects" includes two lists. The first list has a year of "2010" assigned to it. These
projects have either been requested by the municipality in which the road segment is found, or was
- . included in a previous letter of commitment to the Metropolitan Council for reconstruction prior to 2010.
This list consists of$68,255,668 in Engineer's Estimate and cannot be funded prior to 2007 with current
funding levels. The second part of Part 3 "Other Projects", is projects, which have been designated by the
year "OTHR" and have been identified as projects needing reconstruction for capacity or safety reasons.
These projects total $111,423,431. These routes will likely require preservation maintenance prior to the
time when reconstruction dollars will be available for them.
.
.
.
- 35 -
SAINT FRANCIS ,- II L~ . 1'HHtl - -.J '--- '-R7t\ I ~\
r-"- "I CSAH 28 CJ '-SAH ,.:,-J u ............
~''Y '=' ,'1>~ \ .~ ~ < J:::
r I ~ L CSAH204 l"R 10 CSAH26 r
L :J.J I j ~"
~R70 / J. --,'-- 1'. EAST BETHEL ~ Ii :r
CSAH24 CR74 5 I 0
CSAH 2 ..--.-r 1 r
I ~~
:! CR B8 cs.v., 22
BURNS ~ ~ LINWOOD
CR82 TOWNSHIP if, OAK u I 12 TOWN~~
ik ~ ~ GROVE iE {J . .
/ CSAH~ JJ h "
f h CSAH22 I ~
~ i ~:\ 'y;'" ~ t22' ~'7 r.;Q\ COLUMBUS . .
13 ~ 't!:J ~ \ ~ TOWNSHIP t:::\l (
CR84 CR58"""" ~ \!V
\ CR83F...I--. ~ ~ CR" 1.11)...) ~ CSAH18 ..
CR03 ~ -~IM " ~,/ CSAH18 ...: 2
RAMSEY C 110./ ~ ~i7
. I~ l~CR-bs c c'f'/ ~.. ^",'J.
., ,J '1 CR60 II - r:r
::l 18 .{SAH20 I ~ 9 ~ CSAH23
~ ~ 27 ~i", ANDOVER / h CROl \ HAM LAKE If '-f
~VS7:_ 51~ ~<S0 @ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 1C'Wi' l'~ 'j ~~ ~ ~ i;
@ . NOK II V"""\ ~
~ ~"'C.(9. ~ '~i" Ai
~ sA'l--: '-- (-ru.2.42 I\,"J CSAH14 j ,~~~
19 '- '\' 24) 1:"'\' 't (~ /./ N
~~ ~c~~ ~ ~q@ ~~BLAINE ~ ~ CRl53 J./' ~ ~
28 ~- T\~ c~ ~o~ J CSAH12 0 #fJ ~ VILLE :
(2 T ~~APIOS.~:: CD 12 ~ #(M 1/ LlNOLAKE\V "'~ [)
'.:::./ ~ iE, I z... / of\. CSAH10,...li ~
" ___ 1-"""./ . ~c'-f1 ~ Q 1 )Jcr
1 '~~ _;: ~~ LEXIN ~~ E, ~ \!Y -')
\ .::r\ SPRIN!>o,.... '@ ~.
29 1 ~~~~ --. 15 (5
, CS H8
1 _ CSAH 1 HANSON TO 93RD LN (TH 610) ~ I
2 _ CSAH 1 RIESLING TO CSAH 78 (HANSON) I I- III
3 _ CSAH 7 INTERSECTION AT 165TH - ADD TURN LANE FRlOL<,.....
4- CSAH 7 01-06-07 116 TO CSAH 20 (RECONDITION)
5-CR 10 LEXINGTON TO CR 53 '694 A. k
6 _ CSAH 11 FROM HANSON TO SAND CREEK - -
7 _ CSAH 12 INTERSECTION OF FOLEY AND NORTHDALE(. cAn 0 a
8 _ CSAH 14 02-614-13 135W TO 135E "~ ~ l70P
9-CSAH17 02-617-16 149THAVETOCSAH18 ~ CSAJ;/ ("ount
10 _ CSAH 17 OLD CR 80 TO CSAH 22' Y
11 _ CSAH 18 INTERSECTION AT TH 65.1 wi
12. CR 18 91-09-18 ANDOVER BLVD TO CSAH 78 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
13 - CSAH 18 INTERSECTION AT NOTRE DAME 201 0
14 _ CSAH 32 CSAH 49 TO CSAH 21 (37.5% RAMSEY)
15 _ CSAH 51 02-651-03 92ND AVE NW TO COON RPDS BLVD
16 - CSAH 51 110THTO TH 242
17 - CSAH 52 MAIN 5T TO CSAH 116
18 - CSAH 56 INTERSECTION AT 155TH
19-CSAH57 TH 10TOCSAH 116
20 _ CSAH 78 02-678-07 TH 242 TO 1000' N OF BUNKER LK BLVD
21 . CSAH 78 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT AT CR 16 N
22-CSAH78 85-15-78 CR58 TO CSAH22 *
23 - CSAH 78 CSAH 116 TO CSAH 18
24-CSAH 78 N JCTCSAH 11 TOTH 242 W E
25 _ CSAH 116 CSAH 78 TO TH 65
26 _ CSAH 116 INTERSECTION AT ANOKA HIGH
27 - CR 116 CR 56 TO CSAH/CR 57
28-CSAH116 0.11 MILEW OF TH 47 TO CR 57 S
29-CR 132 CSAH 1 TOTH47 - 36 -
30 _ CW, 400 99-63-00 NW METRO RIVER CROSSING
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
CSAH 1 HANSON TO 93RD LN (TH 610) 2010 6,882,744
CSAH 1 RIESLING TO CSAH 78 (HANSON) 2010 9,176,992
CSAH 7 01-06-07 116 TO CSAH 20 (RECONDmON) 2010 800,000
. .
CSAH 7 INTERSECTION AT 165TH ADD TURN 2010 200,000
LANE
- .
C.R 10 LEXINGTON TO CR 53 2010 1,441,018
CSAH 11 FROM HANSON TO SAND CREEK 2010 1,228,957
CSAH 12 INTERSECTION OF FOLEY AND 2010 1,250,000
.. NORTHDALE
CSAH 14 02-614-13 I35W TO I-35E 2010 5,712,784
CSAH 17 OLD CR 80 TO CSAH 22 2010 10,815,740
CSAH 17 02-617-16 149THAVETOCSAH 18 2010 3,414,102
CSAH 18 INTERSECTION AT TH 65 2010 1,250,000
C.R 18 91-09-18 ANDOVER BL YD. TO CSAH 78 2010 1,104,702
CSAH 18 INTERSECTION AT NOTRE DAME 2010 250,000
CSAH 32 CSAH 49 TO CSAH 21 (37.5 % RAMSEY 2010 3,627,484
CSAH 51 02-651-03 92ND AVE NW TO COON RPDS BL YD 2010 1,638,749
CSAH 51 1 10th TO TH 242 2010 4,424,245
CSAH 52 MAIN ST TO CSAH 116 2010 1,722,029
CSAH 56 INTERSECTION AT 155TH 2010 500,000
CSAH 57 TH 10 TO CSAH 116 2010 1,638,749
.
CSAH 78 02-678-07 TH 242 TO 1000' N OF BUNKER LK BL YD 2010 4,178,454
CSAH 78 CSAH 116 TO CSAH 18 2010 2,400,000
CSAH 78 N JCf CSAH 11 TO TH 242 2010 2,457,914
< - CSAH 78 INTERSECfION IMPROVEMENT AT CR 2010 800,000
16
. CSAH 78 85-15-78 C.R 58 TO CSAH 22 2010 1,600,361
<
CSAH 116 CSAH 78 TO TH 65 2010 8,356,908
C.R 116 C.R.56 TO CSAHlCR 57 2010 1,386,979
CSAH 116 0.11 M WOFTH 47 TO CR57 2010 1,600,361
Wednesday;!Au&ust.08;;l200ti,~~::'~~';1.."V~~Ci\;:;;.:;~''''' Jt-;.,*~,;,,'<t; tr%-A''m:;'D~.t;'JLi:i<;~;;''~~4f<#'' j~'1 P'1~e,'J;:ui..i'1
("V-y.",.......f'i",I. ,,_......,...., """"';._","",_-I"J.f","~...!..,_....".."""..<..L",_.."",h'-'" "~"",,,,:r.ol""..~ <:"'""",~-,",.",,~~,.,.. ~I", ,_ ..V'"' ~,.....'t;O;""\1~~
- 37 -
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
CSAH 116 INTERSECTION AT ANOKA HIGH 2010 350,000
C.R. 132 CSAH 1 TO TH 47 2010 2,949,497
C.W. 400 99-63-00 NW METRO RIVER CROSSING 2010 5,000,000
.
* * SubTotal * * 88,158,766
-
.
.
-
.
.
- 38 -
~~:-!}Al~~~IJif!~~~~~~~~~1~~~~
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
...-....-----
CSAH I CSAH 7 TO CSAH 14 (MAIN ST) OTHR 1,152,814
CSAH 5 CSAH 24 TO HILLENDALE OTHR 2,209,405
CSAH 6 INTERSECTION AT TH 65 OTHR 300,000
.
CSAH 7 CSAH I TO CSAH 14 OTHR 1,008,713
. . CSAH 7 141STTOCR58 OTHR 2,240,505
CSAH 9 149th A VB TO N LEG CSAH 20 OTHR 1,920,433
CSAH 11 CSAH 78 TO RA YEN ST OTHR 983,249
.. CSAH 11 CSAH 12 TO.5 MI. E OF CSAH 78 OTHR 2,161,527
CSAH 12 SUNSET RD FROM CSAH 12 TO APOLLO OTHR 144,102
DR
CSAH 12 CSAH 17 TO CR 53 (SUNSET) OTHR 934,748
CSAH 14 INTERCHANGE AT 1-35W OTHR 4,500,000
CSAH 14 94-10-14 INTERCHANGE AT 1-35W PLANNING OTHR 360,000
CSAH 17 CSAH 18TOOLDCR80 OTHR 1,274,657
CSAH 21 SO.COUNTY LINE TO CSAH 14 OTHR 2,464,336
CSAH 22 CR 64 TO CR 65 OTHR 1,699,542
CSAH 22 CR 65 TO CSAH 5 OTHR 1,274,657
CSAH 23 CSAH 19 TO 1-35 OTHR 2,719,267
CSAH 23 #17 TO CSAH 49 OTHR 3,686,871
CSAH 23 CSAH 14TOCSAH 19 OTHR 2,719,267
CSAH 23 1-35W TO CSAH 14 OTHR 1,280,288
CSAH 23 S COUNTY LINE TO LAKE DRIVE OTHR 432,305
CSAH 23 CR 105 TO CSAH 17 (LEXINGTON) OTHR 3,195,288
CSAH 24 TH 47 TO CSAH 28 OTHR 864,611
. .
CSAH 30 TH 47 TH CSAH 7 OTHR 864,611
:
CSAH 36 CR 77 TO NORTH COUNTY LINE OTHR 1,869,496
C.R. 52 CSAH 116TOCR61 OTHR 1,699,542
C.R. 58 CSAH 7 TO CSAH 9 OTHR 3,399,084
- 39 -
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
C.R. 58 CSAH 9 TO CSAH 18 011:lR 4,248,855
C.R. 64 CSAH 83 TO CSAH 5 011:lR 2,294,382
C.R. 65 WEST COUNTY LINE TO CSAH 22 OTIIR 424,886
.
C.R. 7l INTERSECTION WITH CSAH 28 OTI:IR 400,000
CSAH 78 CSAH 18 TO CSAH 20 OTIIR 3,000,000 . .
C.R. 79 1900 FT SW OF CSAH 9 TO 11:1 288 OTIIR 918,415
C.R. 103 CSAH 13 TO CSAH 26 OTI:IR 2,549,313
. C.R. 105 LAKE DRIVE TO CSAH 52 (95 11:1 A VB) OTI:IR 1,441,018
CSAH 116 11:1 65 TO CSAH 17 OTI:IR 3,144,153
C.R. 140 CSAH 14 TO CSAH 21 OTIIR 6,554,994
* * SubTotal * ~ 72,335,332
I
- -
~
.,
-40 -
~1~1~t~~3t~~;~~-=r.l""",~~; ~~~,
Project Description Year Engineers City
Number Estimate Costs
n-----____________..._n__n._..__... ..__.______.._..____._..___.____......_.....___ .......-.... ......... ...... .-------...-.-.---.....-....... ._------._-......._.._.._._...~--_..._----
.. SubTotal .. 460,628,190
. .
.
-
. .
:
- 41 -
Th d ';;:A tll200l;""" <' "~'. -H"-..,""-#''''~nt,'''_-.'w'.'''I.''''!W\~;".."rIi\'i.,~
urs 331 ugus " t1':,,,,::::i~'^:~ ~~.,~"'1';...':'t$'~::.;~~.\~<i~~q: '" ,."':~_ih;]i';1';"'>;)}#~"'-~''"~~, r,.,'.'!'~~t.:"7~' .'~
'~_"'"~ ~ ~""", y~.' .. '>' ,..."<1', ~"' ~ 'v'~ ~.' '. ~~<"'" ~, ~" ~ ""~~),"'~""...,,,, ~ ~\-"",,, ... ."''''~''' .
.
-
.
.
..
CIP
. .
:
- 43 -
.
Introduction to CIP
-
- .
Anoka County has a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for major county projects. This includes new
alignments and bridge projects. The following projects are included in the 5- Year Plan in Section 2, but
are also included here in an effort to supply more detailed information on these projects.
..
.
.
-
- 45 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ~ COMMITIEE RECOMMENDED
~ 17-May.2001
ROAD & BRIDGE'
2002 2003 -
2004 2J05 2006 TOTAL
I PROJECT COSTS I REF. NO CIP CIP CIP GIP CIP . CIP
(3) Interchange at Hanson & T.H. 10 1995-05 _ ~525,009 ~75,000 Sl,500,000 Sll,500,000 SO S14,000,000
(3) Hanson Blvd. Rail Grade Separation 1996-08 SO SO SO SI,50C.000 S7,000,000 S8.500,000 -
(3) CSAH 32 @ 1-35W 200D-l1 SO SO SO S2,00C.000 S9,000,OOO $11,000,000
(3) CSAH 23 @ 1-35W -
200D-14 $0 $600,000 S600,000 $3,800,000 S9,000.000 $14,000,000
.
~-t:i"", L.I~..... Sliolt Sla.raQJ, eBB1 e.4 . 'C9 _.:'~'::.~~)B'IBeB' . .$899,999 ' $8 '8 J,B I a,aao
(4) TH 242 - Thrush St to Davenport Sl ~o00 $33o;~00 , ,~$4.800,000 . SI~~,86~ SI ,850 ,ODD S26,486,546 S45,494,416
I. " ,
TOTAL COSTS ROAD & BRIDGE S855,000 S5,985,000 S14,927,866 S20,650,000 S51,466.546 S93,904,416
I PROJECT FUNDING I
BNSF 1996-06 SO $0 SO SO $425,000 ' S425,000
BNSF 2002-11 SO SO S35,393 SO S369,327 ~ $424,720
City PartlclpaUon (Road & Bridge) 1995-05 S250,000 SO S500,000 SI,250,OOQ. SO S2,000,000
City PartlclpaUon (Road & Bridge) 1996-06 SO $0 SO S500,000 $500.000 <- $1,000,000
City Participation (Road & Bridge) 200D-l1 $0 SO SO SO Sl,OOO.Ooo . Sl,OOO,OOO
City Participation (Road & Bridge) 200D-14 SO SO SO SO SI,OOO.Ooo ' SI,OOO,OOO
City Participation (Road & Bridge) 2002-11 SO SO S637,360 $0 S2,207,310 $2.1144,670
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 1995-05 S275,000 $475,000 Sl,OOO,~oo $1,550,000 $0 $3,300,000
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 1996-08 SO SO SO Sl,OOO,OOO S500,OOO Sl,500,000
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 2000.11 SO SO SO . Sl,500,000
Sl,OOO.OOO $500,000
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 2000-14 SO SO SO $700,000 Sl,400,000 S2,100,000
CeYR~ 1=811 b.9'~ Reali 1 RFi"B8 :agg101 ft" f"l.1IJ.t"QQ tiOO, 'JOQ $9 19 $918,898
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 2002-11 SO SI94,OOO SO S627.,500 SO S821 ,SOD
r
Federal (Road & Bridge) 1995-05 SO SO SO S6,960 ,000 SO S6,960,000
Federal (Road & Bridge) 1996-08 $0 SO SO $0 $4,460,000 $4,460,000
Federal (Road & Bridge) 200D-ll SO SO SO SO S5,600,OOO S5.600,000
Federal (Road & Bridge) 200D-14 SO SO SO SO $4,400,000 $4,400,000
G.O. Caplla1lmprovement Bonds 2002-11 SO SO S2.190,435 SO S6,710,131 S8,900,566
Ramsey County (Road & Bridge) 200D-ll SO SO SO Sl,OOO',OOO S500,OOO Sl,500,000
Stale (MN DOT) 1995-05 SO SO SO Sl,740',OOO SO Sl,740,000
-
Stale (MN DOT) 1996-08 SO SO SO SO Sl,115,000 Sl,115,OOO
Stale (MN DOT) 200D-ll SO SO SO SO Sl.400,000 Sl,400,OOO
State (MN DOT) 200D-14 SO SO ~O SO Sl,100,000 ~1, 1 00,000
State (MN DOT) .1QQ2:11. ~O ~O $425,000 ~92MOO S9,350,000 ~1 0,700,000
Stale Tumback (MN DOT) 200D-14 SO S600,000 S600,000 S3,1001,000 Sl,100,000 S5,400,OOO
Stale Turnback (MN DOT) 2002-11 S330,000 $4,408,000 S8,939,680 S29;',500 S7,829,760 S21,602,960
,
TOTAL FUNDING ROAD & BRIDGE S855,000 S5,985,000 S14,927,666 S20,65(',OOO S51,486,548 S93,904,416
I NEW DEBT SERVICE LEVY IMPACT I ":.'
G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds 2002-11 SO SO S160.636 $321,276 S606.760 Sl ,266,674
TOTAL NEW LEVY ROAD & BRIDGE SO SO Sl60,636 S321 ,276 S606.760 Sl,288,674
.
(1) Contingent upon the impact of changes to the Ramsey County Ubrary delivery system in Arden Hills, Mounds View, and surrounding areas
(2) Moved to the 2001 or 2002 Operating Budget
(3) Contingent upon the availability of outside funds (State, Federal, Municipality)
(4) Contingent upon reaching agreement with MnDOT to assume jurisdiction of CSAH 22 (Viking Blvd) and the City of Coon Rapids to assume jurisdiction of Northdale
Blvd (CR 11) and Crooked Lake Blvd (CR 18)
(5) Contingent upon the availability of outside funds (State and Municipal) through the Public Safety Committee and includes infrastructure
(6) Contingent upon acquiring franchise fee revenues from cities to cover the County's costs
(7) Future network replacements and new installations will use Fast Ethernet
(8) Contingent upon appropriate financial participaUon by Andover and Coon Rapids - 46 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
... PROJECT TITLE Interchange at Hanson & T.H. 10 Start Date 01/0112001
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12/3112005
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 1995-05. Cost Center 2900
. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
. This project Includes reconstruction of Hanson Boulevard from 100' south of Robinson Drive to 600' north of the north leg of Northdale Boulevard
- . Induding a new wider bridge and recontiguration of the ramps to T. H. 10. This location is a probable location for a single point interchange.
.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
The current traffic at this location is approximately 33,000 cars per day on Hanson. A large portion of those are turning onto T.H. 10. The current
configuration indudes high numbers of left tums. In addition, the intersections of Northdale Drive and Robinson Drive are problematic because of
. location and geometries. The interchange experiences high levels of congestion. The ramp to south bound T.H. 10 is metered and backs up into
Hanson Blvd. during the a.m. peak.
This project has been submitted for advanced funding by the 2001 Legislature. If selected, the time frame of this project may change.
Summary of Total ProJect Costs ProDosed EXDendltures bv Years
A APPROXIMATE TOTAL COST: $14.000,000 PRIOR YEARS
THROUGH 2001 $0 2005 $11,500,000
B. COST ALREADY INCURRED: $0 2002 $0 2006 $0
C. BAlANCE TO FINISH: $14,000,000 2003 $1,000,000 2007 / BEYOND $0
.2004 $1,500,000 Project Total $14,000,000
SummarY of 5 Year CIP Cost Estimates Estimated Effect of Com Dieted Prolect on Oceratlna Budaets of this
1 . Land $1,500,000 DeDartment Ion a vearIY baslsl Ifrom CIP fonn No. 41
2 . Professional Services $2,000,000 A ADDITIONAL SAlARY COST: $0
3 . Road Contract Payments $10,500,000 B. ADDITIONAl OTHER EXPENSES: $26,000
TOTAL: $26,000
Total 5 year CIP Costs: $14,000,000
C. INCREASED REVENUE: $0
.
D. DECREASED OPERATING EXPENSE $0
TOTAL: $0
.
NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET: $26,000
NEW POSITIONS: 0
CIP FORM NO 1
- 47 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
'2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE Interchange at Hanson & T.H. 10 Start Date 01.'0112001
. DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est Completion Date 12'3112005
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 1995-05 Cost Center 2900
.
ITEMIZED PROJECT COSTS AND PROPOSED FUNDINIGS
.
PROJECT COST 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FIVE YEAR ~ .
, TOTAL
Road Contract Payments $0 $0 $0 $10,500,000 $0 $10,500,000
Professional SeNices $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
Land $0 $0 $1,500,000 . $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total Costs $0 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $11,500,000 $0 $14,000,000
.
PROJECT FUNDING .
City Participation (Road & Bridge) 0 250,000 500,000 1,250,000 0 2,000,000
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 0 750,000 1,000,000 1,550,000 0 3.300,000
Federal (Road & Bridge) 0 0 0 6,960,000 0 6,960,000
State (MN 001) 0 0 0 1,740,000 0 1,740,000
Total FundinCl $0 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $11,500,000 $0 $14,000.000
DEMAND FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
Anoka County has tor years emphasized Hanson Boulevard as a main north/south route. It has become even more Important with the increased
development in south Andover. TU'Tle frame has been moved back to match the Federal funding cycle.
CONDITION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
The existing bridge is sound but geometrically different The crown of the bridge also leads to poor sight distances. If replaced, the length should
also be Increased to allow an additional lane on T. H. 10 below.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PROVIDING SERVICE THROUGH SHARED FACILITIES
It is pOSSible that MNDOT would participate in the project.
-
.
CIP FORM NO 2
- 48 -
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT nTlE Interchange at Hanson & T.H. 10 Start Date 01/0112001
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est Completion Date 12/3112005
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 1995-05 Cost Center 2900
. .
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NARRATIVE
-
.
. .
.
.
CIP FORM NO 3
- 49 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE Interchange at Hanson & T.H. 10 Start Date 01:0112001
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est Completion Date 12:3112005
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority ,
PROJECT NUMBER 1995-05 Cost Center 2900
. .
EFFECT ON THE OPERATING BUDGET WORKSHEET ..
DITIQf(~;S~~'~s,];';1\;"iR81\ ,;r
TOTAL
EMPLOYEE
#OF YEARlMONTH COST FUNDING TOTAL
.. NEw POSmONS (TITLE) POSITIONS NEEDED (SAL BEN) % FUNDED ~iOURCE COSTS
PERMANENT
NONE 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
TEMPORARY/OT
Temporaries 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
Overtime 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
Subtotal Salary Costs 0.00 $0 $0
Qrno~trI{$i'E:XPENSE$;fl0t'Mffi*~1mllilli~twst]~~1\~&0l '
DEPARTMENT COST (Supplies, Training, Mileage, etc.)
OPERATING COST (Space, Rent, Phone, Ins. etc.) ~.26,000
FURNISHING (Desk, Chair, Partitions, etc.) $0
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT (PC's, Phones Systems, Autos, etc.) $0
SUBTOTAL OTHER EXPENSES l.26,OOO
- .
Increase In County Revenue $0
$0 .
Decrease In Operating Expense
.
-
SUBTOTAL CHANGES IN REVENUE $0
NET INCREASE IN OTHER EXPENSE AND REVENUE $26,000
GRAND TOTAL - NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET $26,000
CIP FORM NO 4
- SO -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002.. 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
..
. PROJECT TITlE Hanson Blvd. Rail Grade Separation Start Date 01/0112004
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est Completlon Date 12/3112007
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 1996-08 Cost Center 2900
. .
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
This project is the rail crossing separation at Hanson Boulevard near 108th Avenue in Coon Rapids.
- ..
..
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
This portion of Hanson Boulevard carries approxlmately 15,000 vehicles per day. The railroad crossing cOnsists of (2) Buriington Northem Mainline
Tracks carrying approxlmately 60 trains per day at a maximum timetable speed of 75 mph. The exlsting crossing has sight distance obstructions In
all quadrants. These factors combined contribute to a significant exposure level at this crossing. Since closing the crossing Is not a viable
altemative, constructing a grade-separated crossing Is warranted to continue Hanson Boulevard's function as a major transportation corridor. It is In
the top live of hazardous crossings In the metropolitan area.
This project will become Illore critical with the implementation of commuter rail along the Northstar Corridor. Commuter rail will add a large number
of carltrain conflicts during the a.m. peak period.
I
Summary of Total Prolect Costs ProDosed EXDenditures bv Years
A. APPROXIMATE TOTAL COST: $8,500,000 PRIOR YEARS
THROUGH 2001 $0 2005 $1,500,000
B. COST ALREADY INCURRED: $0 2002 $0 2006 $7,000,000
C. BALANCE TO FINISH: $8,500,000 2003 $0 2007 / BEYOND $0
2004 $0 Project Total $8,500,000
SummarY of 5 vear CIP Cost Estimates Estlmated Effect of Com Dieted Prolect on ODeratlnQ BudQets of this
1. Land $2,000,000 DeDartment (on a vearlY baslsl (from elP fonn No. 41
2 . Professional Services $750,000 A. ADDmONAL SALARY COST: $0
3 . Road Contract Payments $5,750,000 B. ADDmONAL OTHER EXPENSES: $45,000
$8,500,000 TOTAL: $45,000
TotalS year CIP Costs:
. C. INCREASED REVENUE: $0
D. DECREASED OPERATING EXPENSE $0
TOTAL: $0
.
.
NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET: $45.000
NEW POSmONS: 0
CIP FORM NO 1
- 51 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAP IT AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE Hanson Blvd. Rail Grade Separation Start Date 01 '0112004
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12'3112007
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 1996-08 Cost Center 2900
-
ITEMIZED PROJECT COSTS AND PROPOSED FUNDINlGS .
-
PROJECT COST 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FIVE YEAR . .
TOTAL
Road Contract Payments $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,750,000 $5,750,000
Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $250,000 $750,000
Land $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000
Total Costs $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $7,000,000 $8,500,000
-
PROJECT FUNDING
BNSF 0 0 0 0 425,000 425,000
City Participation (Road & Bridge) 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 1,000,000
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 0 0 0 1,000,000 500,000 1,500,000
Federal (Road & Bridge) . 0 0 0 0 4,460,000 4,460,000
State (MN DOl) 0 0 0 0 1,115,000 1,115,000
Total FundlnQ $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $7,000,000 $8,500,000
DEMAND FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
For years, Anoka County has emphasized Hanson Boulevard as a main north/south route. It has become that, par~cularly with the increased
development in south Andover.
CONDITION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
The existing roadway is deficient in capacity, turn lanes, drainage and surface condition. While the existing railroad crossing is equipped with
flashing lights, gates and bells; the sight deficiencies are still a concern, particularly with school buses and other v41hicJes, which are required to
stop at railroad crossings.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PROVIDING SERVICE THROUGH SHARED FACILITIES
This Improvement would have a significant positive impact on the viability of the North Star Commuter Rail Project.
-
.
.
.
CIP FORM NO 2
- 52 -
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
. PROJECT nTlE Hanson Blvd. Rail Grade Separation Start Date 01/0112004
OEPARTMENT Highway Department EsL Completion Oate 12/3112007
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 1996-08 Cost Center 2900
. .
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NARRATIVE
.
.
.
. .
.
.
CIP FORM NO 3
- 53 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE Hanson Blvd. Rail Grade Separation Slart Date 01;0112004
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12'3112007
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 1996-08 Cost Center 291)0
- .
.
EFFECT ON THE OPERATING BUDGET WORKSHEET .
.
TOTAL
EMPLOYEE
'OF YEARlMONTH COST FUNDING TOTAL
. NEW POSITIONS (TITLE) POSITIONS NEEDED (SAL BEN) % FUNDED liOURCE COSTS
PERMANENT
NONE 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
TEMPORARY/OT
Temporaries 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
Overtime 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
Subtotal Salary Costs 0.00 $0 $0
DEPARTMENT COST (Supplies, Training, Mileage, etc.) $45,000
OPERATING COST (Space, Rent, Phone, Ins. etc.) $0
FURNISHING (Desk, Chair, Partitions, etc.) $0
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT (PC's, Phones Systems, Autos, etc.) $0
SUBTOTAL OTHER EXPENSES $45,000
Increase In County Revenue $0 .
Decrease In Operating Expense $0 .
.
SUBTOTAL CHANGES IN REVENUE $0
NET INCREASE IN OTHER EXPENSE AND REVENUE $45,000
GRAND TOTAL - NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET $45,000
CIP FORM NO 4
- S4 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
\
PROJECT MLE CSAH 32 @ 1-35W Start Date 01/0112005
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12/3112007
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 2000-11 Cost Center 2900
. .
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
This project is located on the south county line at the Ramsey border. The City of Shorevlew is proposing extensive development south of County
. Road J and east 1-35W. The counties reconstructed County Road J both east and west of this location to four lanes several years ago.
.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
As indicated above, County Road J was widened to four lanes several years ago with the bridge over 35W being the exception. Current traffic
counts are 19,000 vehides per day east of the bridge and 18,200 west of the bridge. With new T. H. 10 opening this summer, added traffic should
be expected. In addition, development pressures in Blaine and Shoreview will put added pressure on this interchange. Left and right turn lanes
must aiso be added.
This project has been submitted for advanced funding by the 2001 Legislature. If selected, the time frame may need to change.
.....
:.,.
Summary of Total Profect Costs Procosed Excenditures bv Years
A. APPROXiMATE TOTAL COST: $11,000,000 PRIOR YEARS
THROUGH 2001 $0 2005 $2,000,000
B. COST AlREADY INCU~RED: $0 2002 $0 2006 $9,000,000
C. BAlANCE TO FINISH: $11,000.000 2003 $0 2007 / BEYOND $0
2004 $0 Project Total $11,000,000
Summary of 5 vear CIP Cost Estimates Estimated Effect of Com Dieted Proiect on Ooeratlna Budaets of this
1 . Land $1,000,000 DeDartment (on a vearly baslsl (from CIP form No. 41
2 . Professional Services $1,000,000 A. ADDITIONAL SALARY COST: $45,000
3 . Road Contract Payments $9,000,000 B. ADDITIONAL OTHER EXPENSES: $12,000
$11,000,000 TOTAL: $57,000
Total 5 year CIP Costs:
. C. INCREASED REVENUE: $0
.
D. DECREASED OPERATING EXPENSE $0
TOTAL: $0
;
NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET: $57,000
NEW POSITIONS: 1
CIP FORM NO 1
- 55 -
ANOKACOUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE CSAH 32 @ 1-35W Start Date 01/0112005
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est Completion Date 1:213112007
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 2000-11 Cost Center 25'00
-
ITEMIZED PROJECT COSTS AND PROPOSED FUNDINGS .
.
PROJECT COST 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FIVE YEAR .
TOTAL
Road Contract Payments $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,000,000 $9,000,000
Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
Land $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
Total Costs $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $9,000,000 $11,000,000
.
PROJECT FUNDING
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 0 0 0 1,000,000 500,000 1,500,000
Ramsey County (Road & Bridge). 0 0 . 0 1,000,000 500,000 1,500,000
City Participation (Road & Bridge) 0 0 . 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000
Federal (Road & Bridge) 0 0 0 0 5,600,000 5,600,000
State (MN DOT) 0 0 0 0 1,400,000 1,400,000
. Total Fundina $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $9,000,000 $11,000,000
DEMAND FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
Traffic on County Road J continues to increase and add~ional development is being proposed for vacant property In the area. Left and right tums at
the ramp are difficult and dangerous.
CONDITION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
The bridge is sound, however, deficient in length and width.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PROVIDING SERVICE THROUGH SHARED FACILITIES
.
.
.
CIP FORM NO 2
- 56 -
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT nTLE CSAH 32 @ 1-35W Start Date 0110112005
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est Completion Date 12/3112007
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 2000-11 Cost Center 2900
. .
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NARRATIVE
-
. .
I .
I I I
L
I I
.., I
.
, . I
. PROJECT LOCATION
.
.
CIP FORM NO 3
- 57 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITlE CSAH 32 @ 1-35W Start Date 0"'0112005
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est Completion Date 1 :!/3112007
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 2000-11 Cost Center 2!100
. .
.
EFFECT ON THE OPERATING BUDGETWORKSHEf:T . -
TOTAL
EMPLOYEE
#OF YEARlMONTH COST I'UNDING TOTAL
. NEW POSITIONS (TITLE) POSIT10NS NEEDED. (SAL BEN) % FUNDED SOURCE COSTS
PERMANENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1.00 12 $45,000 0% STATI: AID & LEVY $45,000
TEMPORARY/OT
Temporaries 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
Overtime 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
Subtotal Salary Costs 1.00 $45,000 $45,000
DEPARTMENT COST (Supplies, Training, Mileage, etc.) $12,000
OPERATING COST (Space, Rent, Phone, Ins. etc.) $0
FURNISHING (Desk, Chair, Partitions, etc.) $0
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT (PC's, Phones Systems, Autos, etc.) $0
SUBTOTAL OTHER EXPENSES $12,000
.
Increase In County Revenue $0
.
Decrease In Operating Expense $0
SUBTOTAL CHANGES IN REVENUE $0
NET INCREASE IN OTHER EXPENSE AND REVENUE $12,000
GRAND TOTAL - NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET $57,000
CIP FORM NO 4
- 58 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAP IT AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE CSAH 23 @ 1-35W Start Date 01/0112004
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est Completion Date 12/3112006
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 2000-14 Cost Center 2900
. . PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
- Replace and Improve the Interchange at the intersection of lo35W and Lake Drive (formerly T.H. 49) and recondition CSAH 23 from Hodgson Rd to
- . 1-35W.
-
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION'
Currently, the North 1-35W to northbound CSAH 23 operates at level of service F for parts of the day (PM peak). extensive development in this area
by Uno Lakes will require Interchange modification. City has Indicated they have $1,000,000 set aside for the project.
I
Summary of Total Project Costs ProDosed EXDendltures by Years
A. APPROXIMATE TOTAL COST: $14,000,000 PRIOR YEARS
THROUGH 2001 $0 200S $3,800,000
B. COST ALREADY INCURRED: $0 2002 $0 2006 $9,000,000
C. BALANCE TO FINISH: $14,000,000 2003 $600,000 2007 / BEYOND $0
2004 $600,000 Project Total $14,000,000
Summarv of S year CIP Cost Estimates Estimated Effect of Com Dieted Prolect on Ooeratlna Budaets of this
1. Land $600,000 DeDartment Ion a vearlv baslsllfrom CIP form No. 41
2 . Professional Services $600,000 A. AODmONAL SAlARY COST: $4S.000
3 . Road Contract Payments $12,800,000 B. ADDmONAL OTHER EXPENSES: $12.000
$14,000,000 . TOTAL: $57,000
TotalS year CIP Costs:
C.. INCREASED REVENUE: $0
. .
- D. DECREASED OPERATING EXPENSE $0
TOTAL: $0
.
.
NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET: $57,000
NEW POSITIONS: 1
-
CIP FORM NO 1
- S9 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE CSAH 23 @ 1-35W Start Date 0110112004
DEPARTMENT . Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12/3112006
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 2000-14 Cost Center 2900
- .
ITEMIZED PROJECT COSTS AND PROPOSED FUN DINGS -
.
PROJECT COST 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FIVE YEAR . -
TOTAL
Land $0 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $600,000
Road Contrad Payments - $0 $0 $0 $3,800,000 $9,000,000 $12,800,000
Professional Services $0 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $600,000
Total Costs $0 $600,000 $600,000 $3,800,000 $9,000,000 $14,000,000
-
PROJECT FUNDING
City Participation (Road & Bridge) 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,OOO,QOO
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 0 0 0 700,000 1,400,000 2,100,000
State (MN DOT) 0 0 0 0 1,100,000 1,100,000
Federal (Road & Bridge) 0 0 0 0 4,400,000 4,400,000
Slale Tumback. (MN DOT) 0 600,000 600,000 3,100,000 1,100,000 5,400,000
Total FundlnQ $0 $600,000 $600,000 $3,800,000 $9,000,000. $14,000,000
./
DEMAND FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
The demand for this projed is the rapid increase In traffic using Lake Drive and the development of the Downtown Center in Lino Lakes.
CONDITION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
Strudural condition Is okay; however, the width and sight distance is deficient.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PROVIDING SERVICE THROUGH SHARED FACILITIES
None
.
.
CIP FORM NO 2
- 60 -
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
. PROJECT TITLE CSAH 23 @ 1-35W Start Date 01/0112004
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12/3112006
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 2000-14 Cost Center 2900
, .
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NARRATIVE
-
-
. ~
.
. .
.
.
.
CIP FORM NO 3
- 61 -
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT nTlE CSAH 23 @ 1-35W Start Date 01/0112004
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12'3112006
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority
PROJECT NUMBER 2000-14 Cost Center 291)0
. ,
.
EFFECT ON THE OPERATING BUDGET WORKSHEET .
. .
TOTAL
EMPLOYEE
#OF YEAR/MONTH COST FUNDING TOTAL
. NEW POSITIONS (TITLE) POSITIONS NEEDED (SAL BEN) % FUNDED llOURCE COSTS
PERMANENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1.00 12 $45,000 0% STATE AID & COUN $45,000
TEMPORARY/OT
Temporaries 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
Overtime 0.00 0 $0 0% 0 $0
Subtotal Salary Costs 1.00 $45,000 $45,000
bDtl1~~tlll!!~EXeEN$~\ta'filfu'f]ifJt1jij~%j...
DEPARTMENT COST (Supplies, Training, Mileage, etc.) $12,000
OPERATING COST (Space, Rent,. Phone, Ins. etc.) $0
FURNISHING (Desk, Chair, Partitions, etc.) $0
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT (PC's, Phones Systems, Autos, etc.) $0
SUBTOTAL OTHER EXPENSES $12,000
Increase In County Revenue $0 .
.
Decrease In Operating Expense $0
SUBTOTAL CHANGES IN REVENUE $0
NET INCREASE IN OTHER EXPENSE AND REVENUE $12,000
GRAND TOTAL - NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET $57,000
CIP FORM NO 4
- 62 -
"
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE TH 242 . Thrush St. to Davenport St. Start Date 01/0112002
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12/3112006 .
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority 1
PROJECT NUMBER 2002.11 .. Cost Center 2900
.
. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
. The lurnback and expansion of TH 242 includes three distinct parts totaling $45 million with a $9.7 million county share. First, Is the reconstruction
. . and expansion. of T.H. 242 between Thrush Street In Coon Rapids and T.H. 65 In Blaine to 4 lanes. Second Is a rail grade separation at the BNSF
railroad just east of Hanson Blvd. Third is a grade separation at T.H. 242/ CSAH 14 and T.H. 65 which would Include reconstruction east to
Davenport Street In Blaine.
-
'. -
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
The Anoka County 2015 Transportation Plan suggests there Is a large demand for east-west movement in Anoka County. The Plan includes a
2015 projected traffic for the corridor. Many of those projections have already been exceeded according to the 1999 State Traffic Volume map. In
addition in 1999 the county, state and cities of Coon Rapids, Blaine and Lino Lakes joined together to prepare the T.H. 242/ CSAH 14 Access
Management Plan. That plan suggests that we should expect volumes in this area to be as high as 30,000 0 52,000 vehicles per day for various
segments of the roadway. The Access Management plan also proposed grade separation at T.H. 65 and at the BNSF railroad. Development
along the east and west ends of this corridor will increase the demand for transportation with a major shopping / entertainment area located west of
T.H. 10 and major hOUSing projects in and around the TPC In Blaine. .
"
Summary of Total Proiect Costs ProDosed EXDenditures by Years
A. APPROXIMATETOTALCOST: $45,494,416 PRIOR YEARS
THROUGH 2001 $0 2005 $1,850,000
B. COST ALREADY INCURRED: $0 2002 $330,000 2006 $26,486,548
-
C. BALANCE TO FINISH: $45,494,416 2003 $4,600,000 2007/ BEYOND $0
2004 $12,227,868 Project Total $45,494.416
Summary of 5 vear CIP Cost Estimates Estimated Effect of Com Dieted Profect on Ooeratlno Budoels of this
1 . Professional Services $8,415,736 Deoartment Ion a yearlY basls\ Ifrom CIP fonn No. 4\
2 . Road Contract Payments $37,078,680 A. ADDITIONAL SAlARY COST: $45,000
B. ADDITIONAL OTHER EXPENSES: $88,000 .~~.
Total 5 year CIP Costs: $45,494,416 $133.000
TOTAL:
. C. INCREASED REVENUE: $0
,
. D. DECREASED OPERA~JNG EXPENSE $0
.
. TOTAL: $0
. ..
NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET: $133,000
NEW POSITIONS: 1
- 63 -
CIP FORM NO 1
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE TH 242 - Thrush SI. to Davenport 51. Start Date 01/0112002
DEPARTMENT Highway Deparjrnent Est. Completion Date 1 :U31/2006 .
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority 1
PROJECT NUMBER 2002-11 -. Cost Center 2'~00
-
ITEMIZED PROJECT COSTS AND PROPOSED FUNDINGS .
.
PROJECT COST 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FIVE YEAR . ~
TOTAL
Road Contract Payments $0 $3,300,000 $9,700,000 $(' $24,078,680 $37,078,680
Professional Services $330,000 $1,300,000 $2,527,868 $1,850,00(1 $2,407,868 $8,415,736
Total Costs $330,000 $4,600,000 $12,227,868 $1,850,00C $26,486,548 $45,494,416
.. PROJECT FUNDING
BNSF 0 0 35,393 II 389,327 424,720
City Participation (Road & Bridge) 0 0 637,360 I) '. 2,207,310 2,844,670
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge 0 194,000 0 627,501) 0 821,500
G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds 0 0 2,190,435 II 6,710,131 8,900,566
State (MN DOT) 0 0 425,000 925,000 9,350,000 10,700,000
State Tumback (MN DOT) 330,000 4,406,000 8,939,680 297,501) 7,829,780 21,802,960
Total Fundina $330,000 $4,600,000 $12,227,868 $1,850,000 $26,486,548 $45,494,416
,
,
DEMAND FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
Expansion of northwest Coon Rapids around T.H. 10 and along Hanson Blvd as well as planned rapid expansion around CSAH 14 (Main Street)
and Radisson Road in Blaine will cause rapid increases in traffic demand on this segment of roadway.
CONDITION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
Poor with little chance of MN DOT getting to repair/reconstruct it due to it's low regional priority.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PROVIDING SERVICE THROUGH SHARED FACILITIES
None. The goal would be for MN DOT to agree to take CSAH 22 (VikIng Blvd) as a trunk highway in the future.
-
~~.
.
CIP FORM NO 2
- 64 -
. ...........'....M...... _..._........
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE TH 242 - Thrush Sllo Davenport Sl Start Date 01/0112002
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Esl Completion Date 12/3112006 .
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Prlorlty 1
PROJECT NUMBER 2002-11 - Cost Center 2900
.
. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NARRATIVE
. . 2002 2003 2004 2005
2006 Total
Reconstruct TH 242 from Thrush St NW to Crain St NW
Uses:
Professional Services $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 660,000
Road Contract Payments 3,300,000 - - - 3,300,000
.. Tolal 330,000 3,630,000 - - - 3,960,000
Sources:
State Tumback (MN DOT) 330,000 3,630,000 3,960,000
-
Reconstruct TH 242 from Crain St NW to U1vsses St NE
Uses:
Professional Services - 970,000 970,000 - - 1,940,000
Road Contract Payments - - 9,700,000 - - 9,700,000
Total - 970,000 10,670,000 - - 11,640,000
Sources: .
Stale Tumback (MN DOT) n6,OOO 6,536,000 , 9.312,000
- - -
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge - 194,000 1,609,000 - - 1,803,000
City Partlclpation (Road & Bridge) - - . 525,000 - - 525,000
- 970,000 10.670,000 - - 11,640,000
Grade SeDaratlon at BNSF Railroad
Uses:
Professional Services - - 707,868 - 707,868 1,415,736
Road Contract Payments - - - - 7,078,680 7,078,680
Total - - 707,868 - 7,786,548 8,494,416
Sources:
State Tumback (MN DOT) - - -106,180 - 1,229,780/' 1,335,960
BNSF Railroad - - 35,393 - 389,327./ 424,720
County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge - - 453,935 - 4,510,131 4,964,066
City Partlclpation (Road & Bridge) - - 112,360 - 1,657,310/ 1,769,670
. - 707,868 - 7,786,548 8,494,416
Grade SeDaratlon at TH 65 and TH 242
Uses:
Professional Services - - 850,000 1,850,000 1,700,000 4,400,000
Road Contract Payments - - - - 17,000,000 17.,000,000
Total - - 850,000 1,850,000 18,700,000 21,400,000
,. Sources:
. State Tumback (MN DOT) - - 297,500 297,500 6,600,000 ' 7,195,000
. Stale TH (MN DOT) . - 425,000 , 925,000 9,350,000/ 10,700,000
. County Tax Levy-Road & Bridge - - 127,500 " 627,500 2,200,000. 2,955,000
City Partlclpation (Road & Bridge) - - - - 550,000 550,000
$ - $ - $ 850,000 $ 1.850,000 $ 18,700,000 $ 21,400,000
Total Uses: $ 330,000 S 4,600,000 S 12,227,868 $ 1,850,000 $ 26,486,548 $ 45,494,416
Total Sources: S 330,000 $ 4,600,000 $ 12.227,868 $ 1,850,000 $ 26,486,548 $ 45,494,416
- 6S -
CIP FORM NO 3
. .'.,", ,.,......'."..',..,.......'.. ..,. .......,.. ,.."...' ................,,'....\... . ....,'"..,."..,;.
'. ANOKA COUNTY
. 2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
-: 2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT
",,;:: Start Date I
PROJECT TITLE Est Completion Date
PROJECT YEAR - Priority
PROJECT NUMBER
.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NARRATIVE .
. . .
-
.
.~~ I
~~ e~ 2
~~ ~~
.... 21
z"
. ~E
,,[- ,
MATCH LINE
.
,.
II
l=i~
.........
~
t I
I
; ol>.
,
i
i
;
I
I
I ~5~'<l'
i
, !=Oo
~o
~ ii i ~ i
; h rn~a
.
I .... [~~
I .
I
, ~"'l
I
t:l<~ I
i
! ,,[
I
. ,
.,. .J,.......
-
-
CIP Form No.3 - 66 -
h...................., ,......
'. ,
ANOKA COUNTY
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET
2002 - 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT TITLE TH 242 - Thrush Sl to Davenport Sl Start Date 01/0112002
DEPARTMENT Highway Department Est. Completion Date 12/31/2006
.
CATEGORY ROAD & BRIDGE Priority 1
PROJECT NUMBER 2002-11 - Cost Center 2900
. .
.
.
~ . EFFECT ON THE OPERATING BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL
EMPLOYEE
- #OF YEARlMONTH COST FUNDING TOTAL
NEW POSITIONS (TITLE) POSITIONS NEEDED (SAL BEN) % FUNDED SOURCE COSTS
PERMANENT '.
.
Equipment Operator 1.00 2004 $45,000 0% 0 $45,000
Subtotal Salary Costs 1.00 $45,000 $45,000
,
-
DEPARTMENT COST (Supplies, Training, Mileage, etc.) $0
OPERATING COST (Space, Rent, Phone, Ins. etc.) $80,000
FURNISHING (Desk, Chair, Partitions, etc.) $0
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT (PC's, Phones Systems, Autos, etc.) $8,000 ..:.>
SUBTOTAL OTHER EXPENSES $88,000
.'
. Increase in County Revenue $0
. '.
; Decrease In Operating Expense $0
., $0
SUBTOTAL CHANGES IN REVENUE
NET INCREASE IN OTHER EXPENSE AND REVENUE $88,000
GRAND TOTAL - NET EFFECT ON OPERATING BUDGET $133,000
- 67 -
CIP FORM NO 4