HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember 24, 1970
AGENDA
/1- .2.1., - 70
J, Pre-I,'M ;y\A.,..Y P/4.+ - Sec.f/oN .:2.
dl, 'Pre-lim ;l'Io.ry P/a.-I- Se.c.+, ;,,,, /4.
3. P("e.li M;no.t')I p /a..J. - See/ioN 15
4. Pre 1;1n; 1'147 P/d. OAk Ridfje h1al1"r- Se~-I/tJlllll
5. ?.....Ij""';no.ry 1> JAt - 5 e.c.+,'DN 5"
I
-1-
, '\ I '\
, , ,
\ / ., )
The regulal' monthly ibmeting of the GrcM Tm'mship
Planning and Zoning Commission was held November 24, 1970 at
Crooked Lake school. Chairman norm Stout called the meeting
.
to order at $:10 P.M. with ~~mmissioilinmembers Christenson,
,
Jones, Langseth, Lundgren and Rither present. At the direction
of the TO\m Board of Supervisors, members Bradley and Holasek
were attending an environmental planning meeting in }linneapolis.
,
Lee Hennen, representing New Housing Concepts, Inc.,
presented a preliminary plat legazl$ described as the f~1t of
Section 2, T32 R24, Anoka County r:linnesota. Subject plat is located
.
in the R-I Zoning District.
Proposed plat does not
conwly with lot width setback requirements in Section 1, Section 2
[lots 1 through 7, 9 through 12, 14 through 20J, and all of
Section 3. Hennen stated that the center area of Section 1 is
primarily s....ramp land and to build a street through the area
)
would be impractical and prohibitive. Discussion was held
regarding road easements and street extensions. It was suggested
that easements be sho1'm on the plat so that prospective buyers
would tknw where future streets would be located and where lots
would be logically subdivided. Moved by Lundgren and seconded by
Jones tolrequire petitioner to resubmit plat shovling how lots Hould
be subdivided into smaller lots when sewer and water are available
in the area. I.lotion carried.
i
Bob Hunns and La\'lrence Blesi presented a preliminary plat
legally described as within the SEi of SEt Section 14, T32 R24,
Anoka County llinnesota. Subject ppat is located in the R-l Zoning
District. Subject plat contains thirteen lots none of which meet
)' the requirements of the Zoning RegulatiomBsOrdinance. According to
the petitioner, lots 1, 3, and 9 through 13 have been sold but deeds
are not of record 1m the Anoka County Register of Deeds office.
j
, /
L
-2-
, , i- \
I ' ). 1 ' /
n response to ques~~on1ng, B esi stated that lues 9 through 12
are under a single contract for deed and that lot 8 has been
conveyed and a house built. Moved by Jones and seconded by
Christenson to approve the preliminary plat as submitted with the
stipulation that lots 1 and 3, 5 or 6 [but not both], 8, 10 or 11
[but not both], and lot 13 be deemed buildable lots until such time
as sanitary sewer is available. Motion carried. One copy of
subject plat with buildable lots duly noted thereon was conveyed
to Township Building Inspector Harold Langseth and one copy placed
in Commission file.
~? Clifford Chapman presented preliminary plat legally
described as the wi of the In1i of the swi of Section 15, T32 R24
Anoka County ~linnesota. Subject plat is located in the R-l Zoning
District. Subject plat contains twenty-two lots none of which
meet the requirements of the Zoning Regulations Ordinance. In
addition, it was pointed out that subject plat does not fulfill
Section 4.04, Lot Provisions, Section A. Discussion was held
regarding lot sizes and future road placement on the W line of
wi of h~1t of swt. Chapman vdthdrew subject plat for further
comaideration. No action taken. Lundgren left meeting at 9:40 P.r1..
James Conroy and John Wallenbecker presented a preliminary
if,
plat [metes and bounds] described as lying within that part of the
swt of Section 17, T32 R24, also knovm as Oak Ridge r~nor, Anotk
County Minnesota. Subject plat is located in the R-l Zoning District.
Discussion was held regarding lot sizes within proposed subdivision.
It was brought out that several of the lots do not meet the require-
ments of the Zoning Regulations Ordinance while many exceed the
\
/
requirements. Petitioner stated that homes have already been
constructed in the area and that additional construction was underway
or contemplated.
-3-
: ) ( )
Chairman Stout explained the requirements of the
R-2 Zoning District classification and asked the petitioner if he
I.
,
J
would agree to rezoning the area from R-l to R-2.
The Commission
felt that due to the natural features, lot sizes and type housing
proposed, H-2 zoning would be appropriate. Wallenbecker stated
. \
that the R-2 Zoning District classificationnwould be acceptable.
Moved by Jones and Seconded by Langseth to rezone that part of ~
Grow To,.mship described as lying \'dthin that part of the swt of
Section 17, T)2 R24, also kno,.m as Oak Ridge Manor, Anoka County
~linnesota, from R-I Siggle Family Rural District to R-2 Single
Family EState District. Motion Garried.
Clifford Chapman requested permission to resubmit for
approval preliminary plat legally described as the wi of the NWt
of the swt of Sectiohn15, T32 R24, Anoka County I~nnesota. Moved
by Jones and seconded by Christenson to reconsider Chapman petition.
!1otion carried. Moved by Jones and seconded by Langseth to accept V
preliminary plat with stipulation that Chapman build on every other
lot within said plat. Motion carried. Chapman agreed to stipulation.
Harold Langseth presented a preliminary plat legally
described as all of the SEt of SEt of Section 5, except south 330
feet, T32 R24, Anoka County tlinnesota. Subject plat is located in
the R-3 Zoning District. During the discussion it was brought out
. )
by Christenson and Jones that lots in Section 1 and Section 5 of
said plat do imt conform to required minimum lot depth as required
by the Zoning Regulations Ordinance. Commission felt that because
majority of lots in subject plat conform to R-3 Zoning District
requirements, those lots in Section 1 and Section 5 should also conform.
Moved by Jones and seconded by Rither to table action on subject plat
for further revision by Langseth of lot depth of lots in Section 1
'-
,
, /
, \
\. )
f \
',....../
-4-
dnd Section 5. Hotion Carried.
,
,
There being no further business to come before the
Planning and Zoning Commission it was moved by Christenson and
seconded by Jones to adjourn. ~btion carried. Meeting adjourned
by Chairman Stout at 11:30 P.M..
)
o
o
GROW T01\NSHIP
()
PLM'NING AM) ZONING BOAHD PROCEEDINGS
1. SUBJECT OF PETITION:
(~zoning
-f4-"Spedal Use Permit
() lluilding Permit
() Plat or property division
() Variance
() Other
j\ DDRESS:
/tzJb{-J::L B Vs Crs-
,~Cz-
2. NN,IE OF PETITIONER:
3. LOC.ATION:
4. DATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ~'EETING AT WHICH HEARING WAS HELD: r /2--7/ ? 0
. I I
5.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ACTION: A J1'otion was Trade by ~_
and seconded by ~7l--'/-d to if...zc; A'--v-.<- h~ ') tf tf- ( .j-
1 Vv'-~ ()~,-. V-..c,,~ .tr CA W"~I ~~.
. DATE:
C)
6. }lli'lBERS VOTING: ,re~
~
lch4Jo?-/
~4
~
.5~~
7.
VOTES:
{
AYES.
o
NAYES.
ABSTAINED.
8. CO~tfENrS ABClIT PETITION:
9. SIGi\'ED:
Planning and Zonin,~ Board Chairman:
'"
\.j
Date:
o ,0
GROW TOM~SHIP
o
PLANNING AND ZONING BOAlliJ PT'DCEEDINGS
1.
SUl3JECT OF PETITION:
() Rezoning
() Srccia1 Use Permit
() Building Permit
() Plat or property division
() Variance
ex) Other PRIVATE SEWER SYSTEMS
2. l':A;,lE OF PETITIONER: NONE
J'DDRESS:
3. LOCATION:
4. DATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ~'EETING AT WHIm HEARING WAS HELD: OCTOBER $, 1970
5. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ACfION: A TI'otion was made by JONES
and seconded by LUNDGREN
to RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF "AN ORDINANCE
o
AND CODE REGULATING INDIVIDUAL SmvAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, MINNESOTA DEPART-
MENT OF HEALTH, 1969 EDITION, AND ANY FUTURE AMENDMENTS DATE: OCT. $, 1970
HEREINAFTER ENACTED.
6. HE'!BERS VOTING: BRADLEY STOUT
.
JONES CHRISTENSON
RITHER LUNDGREN
7. VaTES: EIGHT AYES. ZERO KAYES.
8. COHIENTS ABOur PETITION:
LANGSETH
HOLASEK
ZERO ABSTAINED.
9. SIGi\'ED:
NORMAN STOUT
Planning and Zoning Board Chairman:
o
Date: OCTOBER $, 1970
.
o
o
GROW TOl'.7~SHIP
o
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
1.
SUBJECT OF PETITION:
() Rezoning
() Special Use Pemi t
() Building Permit
() Plat or property division
() Variance
(XJC Other PLUMBING CODE
2. NA\1E OF PETITIONER: NONE
j\ DDRESS:
3. LOCATION:
4. DATE OF PLAl\'NING AND ZONING BOARD ~!EETING AT WflICH HEARING WAS lIELD:OCTOBER $, 1970
S. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ACTION: A I!'otion was made by BRADLEY
and seconded by LUNDGREN
to RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF MINNESOTA
o
STATE PLUMBING CODE, 1969 EDITION, AND ANY FUTURE AMENDMENTS HEREINAFTER
ENACTED.
. DATE: OC T. $, 1970
6. 1'lli'!BERS VOTING: BRADLEY
JONES
RITHER
7. VOTES: EIGHT AYES.
8. CO:l-tlENTS ABOlIT PETITION:
STOUT
CHRISTENSON
LUNDGREN
LANGSETH
HOLASEK
ZERO KAYES.
ZERO
ABSTAINED.
9. SIG1\'ED:
NORMAN STOUT
Planning and Zoning Board Chairman:
o
Date: OC TOBER $, 1970
o 0
GROW TOWNSHIP
<)
PLANNING AND ZONING BOA]{l) PROCEEDINGS
1.
SUBJECT OF PETITION:
() Rezoning
() Special Use Permit
() Building Permit
() Plat or property division
() Variance
(X) Other BUILDING CODE
2. M\lE OF PETITIONER: NONE
J'l1DRESS:
3. LOC.ATION:
4. DATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ~'EETING AT WHICH HEARING WAS IlELD:OCTOBER $, 1970
S. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ACfION: A rrotion was rr.ade by JONES
and seconded by HOLASEK
tcRECOMMEND ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO
o
GROW TOWNSHIP BUILDING CODE AS PROPOSED BY TOWNSHIP BUILDING INSPECTOR
HAROLD LANGSETH
. DATE: OCT. $, 1970
6. t-IDffiERS VOTING: BRADLEY
JONES
RITHER
STOUT
CHRISTENSON
LANGSETH
HOLASEK
LUNDGREN
7. VOTES: EIGHT AYES.
ZERO NAYES.
ZERO
ABSTAINED.
8. COH(E}..r!'S ABOlIT PETITION:
9. SIG;"''ED:
NORMAN STOUT
Planning and Zoning Board Cllairman:
o
Date:
OCTOBER $, 1970
o 0
GROW TOWNSHIP
o.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOAHD PROCEEDINGS
1.
Slil3JECT OF PETITION:
() Rezoning
() Special Use Permit
() Building Permit
() Plat or property division
() Variance
(X) Other ZONING REGULATIONS
, ORDllHU~\jr.. lWU L.OIHm. l'llU'
2. NA',JE OF FETITI01-';ER: NONE
j\ DDRESS :
3. LOC.ATION:
4. DATE OF PLAI\'NING ANTI ZONING BOARD ~'EETING AT WHICH HEARING 1\'AS HELD: OCTOBER $, 1970
5. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ACTION: A fl'otion was rr.ade by RITHER
and seconded by
JONES
to RESUBMIT TO GROW TOWNSHIP BOARD OF
o
SUPERVISORS THE PROPOSED TOWNSHIP OF GROW ZONING REGULATIONS ORDINANCE AND
ZONING MAP AS REVISED BY ZONING AND PLANNING COMMlSSIO~.DATE: OCT. $, 1970
6. l'lEHBERS VOTING: JONES
RITHER
LUNDGREN
STOUT
CHRISTENSON
LANGSETH
HOLASEK
7. VarES: SIX
AYES.
ONE [lJ MYES.
ZERO
ABSTAINED.
8. COHIEI\1TS ABOlIT PETITION:
9. SIGNED:
NORMAN STOUT
Planning and Zoning Board Chairman:
o
Date: OCTOBER $, 1970