Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 29, 1972 AU8Ust 29, 1972 TOI GROW TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROI-II PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUBJECT. PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT CEDAR CREST ESTATES JRD ADDITION. HORACE MAYO, CHARLES BANKEY PRINCIPALS. GENTLEllEN . (1) It was moved by Holasek and seconded by Jones to refuse approval on engineer's report and Ordinance 10 Section 8 required preliminary Plat data. Carried unanimously. (2) It was moved by Jones and seconded by Clendening to table final action until regular meeting September 26, 1972. Carried unanilllously. (3) No recommendation at this time. Robert Hither, Chairman, Planning and. Zon1t.g COIlIllselon The regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission will be held AUGUST 29, 1972 - 7:30 PM - Crooked Lake school. Agenda 1. Windschitl, Gerald G. Request for exemption from Platting and Subdividing Ordinance No. 10. 2. Town Board Chairman Richard Schneider request that the Commission re-examine the Luke rezoning request. Schneider indicates that the Commission should examine the possibility of rezoning the existing R-1 District located between the two northerly R-2 Districts to the R-2 District. The easterly boundary would be County Road 58, also known as Valley Drive. 3. Mayo, Horace and Bankey, Charles - Public Hearing on Preliminary plat, Cedar Crest Estates 3rd Addition. Please review the enclosed plat carefully and see how it stacks up against Ordinances 8 and 10. Jot down any comments, questions or suggestions regarding possible revisions of lotting arrangement, road layouts, park locations, etc., and bring them to the meeting. Feel free to mark up the plat - notes sometimes get lost. 4. Discussion regarding Amendments to Ordinance No. 8 1. Definitions Page 1 (C) (D) 1,2 8.19 (F) Animals The Township is encountering problems regarding the keeping of animals, particularly horses. Consideration will be given to enacting an "Animal Ordinance" or revising the language of Ordinance No.8. 2. 4.11 Relocated structures. The language should be revised to include "other structures" on any lot whether vacant or not. At the present time, an "ether structure" could be moved onto a lot which is not vacant, without Commission reviewal. Anoka County Ordinance No. 72-1 is for your information and study. August 29, 1972 A regular meeting of the Grow Township Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Hither at 71)0 on August 29, 1972. First to be called on our agenda was Gerald G. Windschill. He did not appear. The next item called by Chairman Hither was a restudy requested by Town Board Chairman Hichard Schneider of the proposed rezoning of the Stack property frOIl R-1 to R-2 by Marvin and Terry Luke. Chairman Schneider would like us to consider rezoning entire west end of township over to County Road 58 or Valley View Drive. Terry Luke noted that at the Public Hearing the Planning and Zoning Commission stated there was no comprehensive plan for the northern pl.rt of the township. Terry stated there was a comprehensive plan. Chairman Rither stated there is an issue of that subject. Mr. Hither states we took part in a federally funded comprehensive plan for the whole of Anoka County and also. a federally funded model zoning ordinance. Grow Township did not implement either. There was full discussion on subject with Luke handing out copies of state code regulating private sewer systems. Hither, Luke, Holasek, Clendening discussed no comprehensive plan. No sewer plan with general tone against rezoning of entire area. Jones stated if entire area was R-2 that this pl.rt of township would be quite heavily taxed in the future because lots would not be,divisible. Clendening noted without comprehensive plan we would be at a disadvantage to rezone at this time. Mr. Hither stated we have two alternatives, to sustain our former motion or to put forth a new motion. Clendening moves to reaffirm planning commission original motion of July 25, with Dean Johnson seconding. Carried unanimously with items 1 thru 4 noted to Board of Supervisors. (1) No comprehensive plan for entire area. (2) Possi:bly too much R~2 area now in entire township.. ()) Physical characteristics do not meet R-2 style requirments. (4) This area, in Anoka Service Area Sanitary Sewer District No. ), has no comprehensive plan for sewer. Gerals G. Windschill was called again at 81)0 but did not appear. At 81)0 a Public Hearing was held on a preliminary plat Cedar Crest Estates Jrd Addition for Horace Mayo and Charles Bankey. This item was published in Anoka COunty union and all property owners within :300 feet were notified with Chairman Hither noting he had received one. The public was invited to come up and speak for or against plat with no one coming forth other than the principl.ls for. Marv Christenson asked for a clarification on setbacks on lots connected with Cul-de-Sacs. Chairman Rither started the commission into the engineer's report on Mayhan. After an hour long discussion including all, of planning commission, Marv Christenson, Richard Schneider, Leroy Winner, Horace Mayo, and Charles Bankey. A Illotion was made by Holasek to refuse approval of plat according to engineer's report and Ordinance 10 Section 8 required preliminary plat data until items noted are corrected. Jones seconds. It is noted Chairman Rither gave Horace Mayo a copy of engineer's report. Motion carried unanimously. August 29, 1972 -2- Jones makes a motion to table final action and continue until regular meeting September 26th. Clendening seconds. Motion carried unanimously. It is noted at this time and will be brought to the attention of the engineer that commission considers Xenia and Blackfoot Minor Streets. At 10100 Chairman Rither ma.de cOllllllission aware of hole in animal ordinance, Ordinance 8, Section 8.19 and of possible action that could be taken. Also Ordinance 8, Section 4.'-1 relocated structures was discussed in the preliminary stages possibly requiring change. Commission is reminded to study these items before next meeting. At 10130 the motion to adjourn was made by Clendening and seconded by Jones. Carried unanimously. / <. August 29, 1972 TO. GROW TOWNSHIP :BO!BD OF SUPERVISORS FROM. GROW TOliNSHll' nAmrUlG AIlD ZCYJINJ CO>Ji:r;.:ilfJ SUBJECT. RE-EXAI1nfATION OJ' Ll~ REZC:U,;a ~t.1tJ'mT G~N1'tF}:m I the tollowlng is relSul:lri1tt~ for 1(Y'~ candd<<'rCl.t1ort. (1) .tt~r restudy ,l'laMing a.1\d. R..~ ~l.~ion vot9d UMt1irr.O'.mly to rea.f'flr.a original denial, of .t1l17 2, relonlr.s or ~t.."'ICk prO~1 t<t ft-;: t-n: rAnin and Terry Luke. (2) After ftt$tooy atId. canaide:l1oUOil, l'la.::l.:"~ n~ $ontn;J COl,Jil*dCl' unanitaousll recouenda town boU'd: Of atJ~nlaa::'tJ.-d.o not ~OM e..ll. 01 wen end ot totmahitt to County1to.1 sa or V:dle, "Ib" ~!v. to 3-2 fIt.~l11 estates on thee. 4 polnto. A. Jio O(lioftl'~@ll\y. 1'1A!\ to!: '1'<<',. B. ?nu1bl:r too hI:~ !-2 ar.. ~<:IIU'. ~n ~t1~l! '(IQf:i'll~. G. It}1l1tvU cl~ch:i!.l.Uc. 41) t)ot ..ot ;1-::t .t;rle l'O~ulJ:~~h. n. 'l'h18 a~, hl At'lciiJ~ Se:tdu J~ Sa!.t~taTY :i';\!'tt$l' r,lsttlc\ ~(t. 3, tl!\B no ,l'\!\ t~ :t(;~. . , . Ji',i~'litti;;;,"'~n~l~n, L ?In.~';l';;:t;' ~<<'!tM to""o!tm ./'.. . ~i\\ / ) '---' o 'f o ?hono 421-1::~? o l~~ /7"-, f)........) t,',';"........ ,"'tJ ~#-...-~Ol.....~.';" V .-,'" ,. '.; '. V'v;" ('l//?Zr"''''''}r'';f'f c..<.;..-~:,-~' l<~ -_~ :>-.-" 1 ...,...y.....I.~ : l '_. i-.- ~_....~" i!7,") ~ ,.., ,:;:' . ',' ,. A,/',,,,'P-l.1;.../?,,{) _*.....~V./...,-'~-'..,..I~i;;, , JJ.(i! "'1.. ..... r ,. f'.- ~".v~. li\.N ;) SU::V~'/C;:S 1 6 ~ 0 0 V A t l E 'f D:: I V E ,~ A ; j 0 r~ A. t.\I N 1'1 E 5 0 7 A 5 5 3 0 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 'l'hat }>"lrt of the NE~; of Scction 18, 'l'oVTnship :32, Range 23 in Anoka County, IUnnesotll described as follows: Beginning at the . North,Jest corner of said NEi; thence South 0027'15" West (assumed bearing) on the Hest line of said NEi a distance of 1,409.66 feet; thence South 80024'11" East a distance of 218.98 feet; thence South 15005'30" East a distance of 101.30 f~ct; thence South 82001157" East to the intersection of the center line of County Road No. 58 (also knmm us Valley Drive) as nON laid out and. travelled; thence Northeasterly on said center line to its inter- section \'lith a line 439 feet Hest of the East line of said NEi as measured at right angles to said East line; thence Northerly and parallel wi th the East line of said NEt and to the North line of said NEt; thence West on said North line to the point of beginning end excepting the following described tracts: 1. l~ acres in the Northlrcst corner of the NUt of the NEi of said Section 18 described as follmrs: Beginning at the North t corner of said Section 18; thence East on the North line of said Section 18 for 396 feet; thence South ffi1d parallel to the West line of the m1~ of the NEi of said Section 18 for 165 feet; thence Hest and parallel to the North line of said Section 18 for 396 feet to a point on the West line of the !fI>lit of the NEt; thence North on said West lino for a distance of 165' feet to the place of begi~~ing. I . "l 1 J ! I i 2. That part of tpe m1i of the NE~ of said Section 18 described' as follm'/s: Beginning at a point on the North line of said mlt of the NEt located 1,127 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; thence South at right angles 419 feet; thence East at right angles 104 feet; thence North at right angles 419 feet to North line of said ~d~ of NEt; thence West on the North line of said ~dt of NEt, 104 feet to place of beginning. Sub.1ect to the right of way of County State, Aid Highl'tay No. 7 as . nOH laid out and, travelled along the West line of said NEt and. subject to the right of way of County Road No. 58 as now laid out and travelled along the North line of said NEt and across the Southeast corner of the above described tract.