HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK - July 26, 2011C I T Y O F
WOWS
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
City Council Workshop
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Conference Rooms A & B
1. Call to Order— 6:00 p.m.
2. Discuss Livable Communities Program with Metropolitan Council - Planning
3. Anoka County Sheriff 2012 Budget Presentation - Administration
4. City Sanitary Sewer & Water Utilities Update — Public Works
5. 2011 Budget Implementation Progress & June 1011 Investment Report - Administration
6. 2012 -2016 CIP Development Discussion/Update - Administration
7. 2012 Budget Development Discussion/Update - Administration
8. Other Topics
9. Adjournment
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David L. Carlberg, Community Develop
SUBJECT: Discuss Livable Communities Program with Metropolitan Council
DATE: July 26, 2011
RE UEST
The City Council is requested to hear a presentation by representatives of the Metropolitan Council
on the Livable Communities Program.
BACKGROUND
The City Council on June 7, 2011 adopted 2011 -2012 Goals and Values. Under the
Livability/Image Goals, the Council recognized that providing quality basic and desired services
enhances the quality of life of our residents. Goals included the following:
1. Pursue preserving open space when viable and feasible opportunities are available.
2. Continue efforts along Hanson Boulevard with promoting sustainable landscape.
3. Determine if the Livable Communities Program is a viable program for Andover.
4. Determine if Metro Transit can be expanded into Andover.
5. Be creative in improving and adding amenity options for the residents of Andover.
6. Review recent 2010 Census data and use for planning future projects.
Attached are several informational items related to the above goals. In addition, information has
been provided for Metropolitan Council District 9 as well as background information on Edward
Reynoso, District 9 Representative who represents our area.
Respectfully submitted,
David L. Carlberg
JMetropolitan Council
Livable COMMUnities Program Facts
Investments in community vitality
Thriving job centers stand on once - polluted land. Workers can find affordable housing in the communities
where they work. Residents can shop, get on a bus to go to work, and enjoy a local park all.within walking
distance from home.
These opportunities are supported by the 1995 Livable Communities Act (LCA), administered by the Metro-
politan Council.
Voluntary program, based on incentives
The LCA provides funding for communities to invest in local economic revitalization, affordable housing
initiatives, and development or redevelopment that connects different land uses and transportation.
The program is a voluntary, incentive -based approach to help communities grow and redevelop, and to
address the region's affordable and lifecycie housing needs.
Programs help reach local, regional goals
The Council makes grant and loan awards through four programs:
> Tax Rase Revitalization Account (TBRA) —Cleans up brownfields for redevelopment, job creation
and affordable housing.
Livable Communitles Demonstration Account (L(DA) —Supports development and
redevelopment that links housing, jobs and services while demonstrating efficient and cost- effective
use of land and infrastructure.
• Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA) —Produces and preserves affordable housing choices for
households with low to moderate incomes.
Land Acquisition for Affordable New Development (LAAND) provides communities with
no- interest loans to help address affordable housing needs.
To compete for LCA funding, communities must negotiate long -term affordable and lifecycle housing
goals with the Council and develop a Housing Action Plan. In 2011, 94 communities are participating
in the program.
The LCA's emphasis is on cooperation and incentives to achieve regional and local goals. Communities are
well - positioned to make decisions about how their cities and towns will grow and develop, but the LCA
recognizes it often takes partnerships and shared resources to move from community plans to
tangible results.
Investments reap impressive results
From 1996 through 2010, the Council awarded 633 grants totaling more than $212 million in Livable
Communities funds. Of those, 68 awards have been relinquished, for a net of 565 grants totaling
$181 million. The net results of these grants are expected to leverage billions of dollars in private and
other public investments. Following is a summary of grants made and their expected results:
• 285 pollution cleanup grants totaling over $82.7 million were made to 40 cities and counties; 88% of
the awards moved forward toward completion, for a net of 25OTBRA grants totaling $73.4 million. The
projects will add $63.9 million in net tax capacity and more than 31,000 new and retained jobs.
196 LCDA grants totaling over $98 million were made to development and redevelopment projects that
link housing, jobs and services, and maximize efficient infrastructure in 57 older and developing cities.
Of these, 90% moved forward towards completion, for a net of 176 grants totaling $85.6 million.
131 grants to 51 cities provided affordable housing opportunities, with 90% of LHIA grants moving
forward to completion. These net awards have provided 717 rehabilitated affordable rental units, 2,112
new affordable rental units, and more than 800 affordable new and rehabilitated ownership units.
Other benefits of LCA funds are restored natural resources, improved transportation options, new community
amenities and thriving new neighborhoods.
Advisory Committee helps select projects
The Livable Communities Advisory Committee recommends funding awards to the Council forthe Livable
Communities Demonstration Account. The committee reviews development and redevelopment proposals
against the program's criteria for connected development patterns that link housing, jobs and services.
The committee's 13 members have expertise in development specialties, including local government
planning, economic or community development; public and private finance; new development and
redevelopment; transportation; environment; and site design.
Cooperative efforts reduce'red tape'
Communities in the region applying for public affordable housing funds to produce affordable multi - family
rental housing need fill out only one application through Minnesota Housing. Representatives from the
Council, the Family Housing Fund and Minnesota Housing review the applications and makes,grants from a
variety of public funding sources, including LHIA.
TBRA funding is coordinated with complementary programs at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the
Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, and Hennepin and Ramsey counties.
For more information
Livable Communities program information
Related fact sheet: Affordable &au kg
Metropolitan Council ^ 390 Robert Street North > Saint Paul, MN 55101
651.602.1000 • TTY 651.291.0904 , Data Center 651.602.1140
E- mail :datacenter @metc.state.mn.us • www.metrocouncil.org Pub. 14 -11 -031 July 2011
Metropolitan Council.
2011 Briefing Sheet:
District; 9
Edward
Region al Palk System Reynoso .
The Minnesota Legislature created the regional park
system in 1974: Currently the system that is open
for public use encompasses 54,633 acres, and is
composed of 39 regional parks; 12 park reserves,
7 special recreation features, and 38 regional trails
that total 231 miles. The system units are owned and
operated by ten implementing park agencies Anoka,
Carver, Dakota, Ramsey, Scott and Washington
Counties; the cities of St: Paul and Bloomington;
Three Rivers Park District; and the Minneapolis Park
and Recreation Board. The Metropolitan Council is
responsible-for long- range planning of the systemto
meet the future needs of the region, reviewing park
master plans and managing the Capital Improvements.
Program (CIP). Additionally, the Council uses its local
bonding authority to help fund the CIR The regional
park system is very, popular, with over 38 million visits
in 2009.
,(3'ji],�� -.,—
There are 11 regional park and trail system units (7
existing and 4 planned) within the district.In addition
to the regional park system resources within the
district; Council research indicates that people are
willing to drive up to 20 minutes away from their
home to routinely visit other regional park system
units. Since 1974 (the beginning of the Regional Park
System), the State has granted $11,798;000 and the
Council $3,063,000 for regional park system capital
improvements within District 9.
The State has historically been the primary funding
source for capital improvements in the regional park
system, with over $353 million granted since the
system's inception in 1974. The Council is.also a
significant funding source, with over $172 million
granted since 1974. Currently, for every $1 the state
grants in bonds towards capital improvements in the
Council's regional parks CIP, the Council matches
an additional $0.67. Other State appropriations to
the Council, which includes 90% of the appropriation
from the co nstitutionally;dedicated Parks and Trails
Fund, ear - marked State bond a' ppropriations, plus
over $128 million of General Fund and Lottery in
Lieu of Sales Tax appropriations from 1985 to 2010 ' t
that help partially fund park system operations and
maintenance costs pass through; the Council to park sgia „;y;
s directed byjaw
is q
01
5 y
Regional Recreation Open Space System
Metropolitan 'Council District 9
i Creek NNA
-St. Bethel j 3
o
Francis
-
�' rt a
Rath Anoka county . ! Martin- lsland•Linwood
I3 Lake'George' " "' j ' "` I 6
East
Bettie[
Narthen : Oak
-� '*n ' Rama (?rave l` 0 u
}North Anoka Couty l
....................... .....,R.::r -} I
Carfoa'Avery
of
� � 9� , � ManagemenrArea
Rum Riv; rtCentral '
!...
n
Columbus
Ramsey :Andover, Pass WMA-
Ham
?8 ANOKA ; lake .
Mississippi West T CentlAnoCt Unty I 1
'• 3
ka I..r: Bunkefs .._.-
ft Central
rl , n c ...... .,, Anoka C l ,
t� f Dayton ` ,J . o� ..�y
. ....., Rice.Greek
° Chain 0 a
- Coon. , 3 -
r ° Elm Champlin `� Raptds `Blame y�
�HENNEPIN sleek a ICemerWWI •-asr
e ;
ash
I Creek €; -ii4 yt, /i /i
La e, Qoo Rapfds f `d b. m/
Cexmgton
a fi
J 'rt r,y2p,.Sprmg Rice:Gieekmx.p�� ���afdEagteOtter
-_...5 Maple s +e! .Brooklyn ?pG�, take - Ch2linof� ' f \f�'�'MSE 1` ;Luke
Grove Park ��._ Park raounds Lakes
Vieth
00.51 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Miles
Regional Parks State and Federal Land
® Existing Regional Parks with Federal
Master Plan Boundaries
- Existing Regional Park Reserves State
with Master Plan Boundaries Existing State Trail
Special Recreation Features
Planned Regional Parks with Approved
Boundaries (not yet open for use) Major Roads and Highways
Regional Trails
Existing
— Planned (within five years)
— Proposed (beyond five years)
October 2010
Metropolitan Council
2011 . Briefing sheet:
Environmental Services
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services
(MCES) is one of three divisions of the Metropolitan
Council. MCES collects and treats wastewater at
its eight regional treatment plants. and develops
plans to preserve and manage the region's water
resources. Operating at .100 percent compliance
with their permit requirements, the treatment plants
process 260 million gallons of wastewater every
day from more than 2.7 million residents. Over 650
miles of large. sewer pipes collect wastewater from
105 communities.
$253,245
Grant and Assistance Programs - a total of
7 local grants: were awarded in the district under
the MCES Twin Cities Water Quality Initiative
(TCQI) Grant Program and the MetroEnvironment
Partnership (MEP) Grant Program. In addition,
there was one county grant and 3 areawide
grants that included the district. The amount of
these grants totaled $253;245.
s
4�
District: 9
Edward:
. I 1 4 1
$26,370,629
Wastewater Facilities.— there are 19 miles of
interceptors, 3 lift stations, 6 meter stations, and a
septage site located within the district. Flow from
the district is conveyed to the MCES' Metro Plant in
District 13.
Other— there are 5 lake, 1 stream; 1 river
monitoring sites.and>a septage site located within
the district.
$232,0009000
The proposed MCES 2011- 2016 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) - The CIP
includes 2 major. projects .that are all or partially
located in the district: Northwest Interceptor
Improvements and.East.Bethel Water Reclamation
Facilities. In addition to major projects; there may
also be some other systemwide improvement
projects in the district. This would include
interceptor rehabilition and lining projects;
interceptor systern standby power improvement
projects; meter improvement projects, security
improvements; and other small miscellaneous.
projects (SSIPs). -Ftirther information on all
of:the MC q,§ S capifaK rojects can be. found on
the Metropplitiaro ncil's Intranet at: http if ,
j t 1 7s, '
l� 1
zi
Metropolitan Gomelu
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services
Metropolitan Council District 9
Lmvmood jc/
P• i
TIsland,
Oak Grovc
,,. George �:: -'._, east Bethel ... ,$
Nowthen
3 } ANOKA
6'
t i
� easr, Bell;
e%warci
R °eUamaflonCdOM
. �..... !, . ., � .. r •. Ham e �J _
i,
\ –
\ , (
Ramsey -:J �•_ Forest
Columbus Lake" -
rnear
an
' 'EN C42
rs ✓ , i ,k Coon Rapid
(A� s Lmo'Lakes
1 r ,r r �s06 L33 , Hugo
Blaine ', m
t > - 7ntercoplor ^' a70, i Cochnass`�� I Cemervilie n
°Dayton f(mP fvemenra -, r L03
�.,
�'A13Q5 Y -�1'
'�" liv t ✓ jf. 230 �L34 s f ±t� 6220'• ,
-.., S>
",izto C.1i2ob Ptne§ r ' s1 '
+ O
Lewng n �t2i3 nifef ceprov
. - Highways and Other Map" Roads - -- Streams
review-
t
0 1 2 4
8
8 10.
Mlles
Infrastructure
Water Quality Monitoring Sites, 2010
D Meters
Large Rivers - Conventional Monitoring
A Lift Stations
Streams - NPS Monitoring
R) Regulators
O
Streams - Watershed Outlet Monitoring
Wastewater Treatment Plants
J0
Lakes Monitored (2009)
e Liquid Waste Hauler Disposal Sites
® Capital Improvement ProjectAreas
Financial Assistance
Interceptors
2008
Foundation Grants
— Gravity
Foundation Drain
Forcemain
0
Service Line
Siphon
Cities Receiving YlAssistance, 2010
Ourall
Low Head Crossing
Je,r;nt,ry 2019
Metropolitan Council District:. 9 .
201:1 Briefing Sheet: Edward .
Transit _ Reynoso
consists of two operating units — Metro. Transit and
Metropolitan Transportation Services (MTS). Metro
Transit operates regular route bus service (both local and
commuter express routes) and Hiawatha light rail and
contracts with BNSF Railway for operation of Northstar
commuter rail. MTS.includes, or provides funding for,
contracted transit service including Metro Mobility, Transit
Link dial -a -ride; and contracted regular routes; the
suburban transit providers; and regional transportation
planning (both highways and transit). Overall; transit
operations are funded 61% by state general funds and
motor vehicle sales tax revenues, 26% from passenger
fares, 8% from federal, revenues,. and 5% from other .
sources including Transitwayoperating revenues from the.
Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB). However,
the percentages vary depending on the type -of transit
service, i.e. regular route service receives 30% from fares
while Metro Mobility fares provide 14% of funding: Transit
capital is funded primarily from a combination of federal
grants and property tax - supported regional bonds.
Region -wide transit provided, nearly 89 million rides in
2009; this is a decline of 6.2 %.from 2008,. due to the
economic recession, but is .a 10% increase over the
past five years. 80% of riders are going to or from work/
school. During 2010 demand -for regional transit service
grew once again. Regional bus ridership increased 0.7 %,
Hiawatha light rail ridership. increased 5.8 %, and Metro
Mobility ridership increased 4.1% during the first half of
2010 compared to first half of•2009. Park and ride usage
increased 18% between 2005 and 2010. The park and
ride system includes 110 lots/ramps in the metro area
with over 29,000;spaces:: In 2010, one third of park and
rides we near.or overcapacity.
I . Investments
Description
of Program
The
Metropolitan
Council's
_:
Transportation Division
consists of two operating units — Metro. Transit and
Metropolitan Transportation Services (MTS). Metro
Transit operates regular route bus service (both local and
commuter express routes) and Hiawatha light rail and
contracts with BNSF Railway for operation of Northstar
commuter rail. MTS.includes, or provides funding for,
contracted transit service including Metro Mobility, Transit
Link dial -a -ride; and contracted regular routes; the
suburban transit providers; and regional transportation
planning (both highways and transit). Overall; transit
operations are funded 61% by state general funds and
motor vehicle sales tax revenues, 26% from passenger
fares, 8% from federal, revenues,. and 5% from other .
sources including Transitwayoperating revenues from the.
Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB). However,
the percentages vary depending on the type -of transit
service, i.e. regular route service receives 30% from fares
while Metro Mobility fares provide 14% of funding: Transit
capital is funded primarily from a combination of federal
grants and property tax - supported regional bonds.
Region -wide transit provided, nearly 89 million rides in
2009; this is a decline of 6.2 %.from 2008,. due to the
economic recession, but is .a 10% increase over the
past five years. 80% of riders are going to or from work/
school. During 2010 demand -for regional transit service
grew once again. Regional bus ridership increased 0.7 %,
Hiawatha light rail ridership. increased 5.8 %, and Metro
Mobility ridership increased 4.1% during the first half of
2010 compared to first half of•2009. Park and ride usage
increased 18% between 2005 and 2010. The park and
ride system includes 110 lots/ramps in the metro area
with over 29,000;spaces:: In 2010, one third of park and
rides we near.or overcapacity.
Regular Route Transit
Regular Route Transit Provider(s):
_MT_S, Metro Transit
Regular routes operating in this district:
59 766 805 811 831 850 852 854 856 860 888;889
Total 2009 ridership of these route(s): 2,023;031 j
Total 2009 cost of route(s): $9,9051209 ,
7 Transit Link Service
Transit Link servicearea(s):.
I
v _ Anoka / NW` Ramsey,
�
*Estimated annual ridership: 18;338
*Estimated annual cost; _ $642;808
Americans with Disabill , ties Service
Americans with Disabilities Service Provider;
i
Anoka County, Metro Mobility,
Certified ADA riders in this District: 632
Average cost per certified ADA rider__
'Late 2010 data extrapolated to estimate yearly totals
tAII COUIIeU
< y
s
l-ui ti
•VV ..:
r
Regular Route Transit
Regular Route Transit Provider(s):
_MT_S, Metro Transit
Regular routes operating in this district:
59 766 805 811 831 850 852 854 856 860 888;889
Total 2009 ridership of these route(s): 2,023;031 j
Total 2009 cost of route(s): $9,9051209 ,
7 Transit Link Service
Transit Link servicearea(s):.
I
v _ Anoka / NW` Ramsey,
�
*Estimated annual ridership: 18;338
*Estimated annual cost; _ $642;808
Americans with Disabill , ties Service
Americans with Disabilities Service Provider;
i
Anoka County, Metro Mobility,
Certified ADA riders in this District: 632
Average cost per certified ADA rider__
'Late 2010 data extrapolated to estimate yearly totals
tAII COUIIeU
CL
.iii..
a ta7
r
r
Metropolitan Council District: 9
2011 Briefing Sheet:: Edward.
Metro HRA (Housing and Redevelopment Authority) Reynosa
Description of Program Investments within District
The Metropolitan Council operates one of
the largest housing and redevelopment
authorities in the region. The Metro .
HRA was established by.the Minnesota
Legislature in 1974 to assistsuburban
communities in administering; rent- subsidy
programs. The Council's HRA currently
administers ten (10) federal and state
funded rent assistance programs. The
programs assist nearly, 7;000 low.income.
households monthly. Rent subsidy
payments totaling $50 million per year
are paid by the Metro HRA directly -to
landlords on behalf of assisted. households
throughout the:region.
Within District 9 there are 815 households
receiving rent assistance benefits through
programs administered by the Metro HRA.
This represents approximately $6,308,100
being paid in federal and state rent
subsidies directly, to landlords each year
on behalf of assisted households in this
district.
As shown on the map on the reverse
side, the service area of the Metro HRA
does not include all parts;ofthe 7 County
metropolitan area. Ten (10) other housing
authorities serve specific cities and
counties. The number above represents
only those served by the Metro. HRA.
x�:
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
SECTION 8 PROGRAMS
Yv.
ANDKA
r
L:
L purl= W S H N G T
lar
EQUALHbtAING
oppowmUrry ;.0 Avi-I
HE EP 114
1% ;4 wit
L
CAR E Tv,-
cka
T—
gad cmk DA TA X"
'.%7 T— T-
S OTT
L
Tw; Xem ?*:L CRAWL*87", V.mvknl.;L
21-v— Tn'
(T-L L 'ft I
0 ualm%k T-7-
ommm" W .. fed I Uwg*
'& TV
Twin Cities1letropolitan Area Housing Authorities:
Metro HRA
31.0Uth Ot P041 HRA
(681j 6024426
9t Paul PHA
(451)8,34-3270
Pip"okithARA
Dakota County CDA
(eal) 675-4400,
feel "mlee
IMIAW1100112 PHA
.(793)1509-5 . 410
Ot Louis Park HRA
101* Uft
(651)
.612).342-14,60
Bloomington ARA
(02),04-25719
luchnilci WA
L
4804936
ealb".Coulfly HRA
(952) l;) 402-90"
(952)5636931'
L '�, .,:. I �
(6-12) 8611.9770
I
Metropolitan Council District: 9
2011 Briefing Sheet Edward
� i ;% i/ �, V3 1 vv 1{ Ls ( 1
Reynoso
The Minnesota Legislature created the Livable Communities Act (LCA) in 1995 and established three
funding accounts to enable communities throughout the region to carry, out their development and
redevelopment plans. The programs have- leveraged billions of dollars in private and public investment
while increasing jobs, affordable housing, and business growth. From 1996 through December-201 0, LCA
funds have resulted in overall investments in the metropolitan area of:
• $79 million to clean up 1,852 acres of polluted land for redevelopment. The Tax Base Revitalization
Account (TBRA) investment is expected to result in over $4 billion in private investment, more than
35,000 new.or retained jobs; and an increase in annual net tax capacity of over $81 million.
• $26 million to help local communities provide greater housing choices by assisting with the
development of over 2;300 affordable new rental units, rehabilitation of over 2,500 affordable rental
units, and construction and rehabilitation of over 900 - affordable ownership units. Through Local
Housing Incentives Account (LHIA) and Inclusionary Housing Account (I HA) investmentsi nearly $700
million in private and public money has been leveraged.
• $91 million to revitalize older- communities and to create new neighborhoods in developing communities
with a mix of housing, jobs and services connected by a variety of transportation choices. Funds from
the Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) are expected to leverage more than $4 billion
in private investment as the projects provide for greater connections between housing and mixed -use
development, transit, and other public infrastructure.
(Because some projects have received grants from multiple accounts, information from the accounts should notbe combined orrepresented cumulatively).
TBi 1350 -1440 Coon Rapids Boulevard, Former St. Paul Terminals, IMI Cornelius, North Central Business District, St.
Francis Auto Parts
Anoka North Central Business District, Greenhaven Housing, Heart of Anoka, Housing Opportunities along the
I,CDA Northstar.Commuter Rail Lines Ramsey East Meandering Park, Ramsey Station Town Center, Ramsey Town Center - I
(* denotes a scattered -site award that may span more Council than one Cncil District)
T TTTA ,. _ . -
F=
$1,036,297
$4,588,756 1
c
0
m
� o
m z
0♦
vi
v
c
u
V
C
a
c 2
C�C
G V
■
r
O
C3
I
sc
I
Ad
I s r
h
c
0
m
� o
m z
0♦
vi
v
c
u
V
C
a
c 2
C�C
G V
■
it Metropolitan Council
390 Robert Street North
St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805
www.metrocouncii.org
Edward Reynoso
Metropolitan Council Member, District R
Edward Reynoso was appointed to the Metropolitan Council by Gov. Mark Dayton in March 2011. Reynoso represents
District 9, which includes the Anoka County cities of Andover, Anoka, Bethel, Coon Rapids, East Bethel, Ham Lake,
Nowthen, Oak Grove, Ramsey, and St. Francis, and the town of Linwood.
Reynoso brings 20 years of experience representing transportation industry members of the Teamsters Union. Specifi-
cally, he has served as the Political Director and Special Projects Coordinator for the Teamsters Joint Council 32 in Min-
neapolis since 2009. Previously, he worked as a Political Representative for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Local 63 in Rialto, Cal., from 1991-99, and as National Political Field Representative for the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters in Washington, D.C. from 1999 -2009.
As a Council member, Reynoso serves on the Environment and Transportation committees.
"One of the top issues facing she region is transportation," Reynoso said. "Growth in affordable transportation, be it
LRT or bus transit, is extremely important." He also noted that more of a focus on economic development will help
ensure a healthy and vibrant region.
Reynoso serves on several community antigovernment organizational boards, including the Governor's Workforce
Development Council, the Workers Compensation Advisory Council, the Minnesota Healthcare Task force and
Governor's job Skills Partnership. Reynoso
lives in Ham Lake with his.wife, Marla.
They have two sons, Adam and Adrian,
and two daughters, Kristyand- Jessica.
To contact Reynoso,-you may call
612331 -3456, or e-mail
edward.reynoso@metcstate.mn.us
■ ■ County Boundary
-" -'- Municipal Boundary
Interstate/Major Highway
Road
0 Council District 9
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
The Census Bureau has
published the first local- level`
results from the 2010 Census.
Data are available for ail levels
of geography: oounties;`cities; .
townships, Census tracts; and
blocks. This MetroStats report
presents analysis of city -'and'
township level data and of
regional trends.
The new data include
tabulations of housing units,
total population and adult
population, by race and'
Hispanic origin.
The Redistricting Files are
intended for use in the re -:'
examination and determination
of political district boundaries.
Additional demographic'.
characteristics data from the
2010 Census, Summary-File 1,
will be available over the:
summer.
For more detailed information,
visit www.metrocouncil.oro /data.
For more information, contact:
Libby Starling
libbv.starling a()metc.state.mn.us
651 -602 -1135
Todd Graham
todd.graham oAmetc.state.mmus
651 -602 -1322
Bans Gumus -Dawes
baris.dawesCoD-metc.state.mn. us
651 -602 -1331
Publication No. 74 -11 -026
City and Township Population, 2010
0 Less than 5,000
5,000 to 9,999
10,000 to 24,999
25,000 to 49,999
® 50,000 to 99,999
- 100,000 or more
0 5 10 is 20
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
The Twin Cities metro area population grew to 2.85 million in 2010,
according to 2010 Census counts released in March. The region's ten
largest cities, in order, are Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington,
Brooklyn Park, Plymouth, Eagan, Woodbury, Maple Grove, Coon
Rapids, and Eden Prairie.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH ■ 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH, ST. PAUL, MN 55101 -1805 ■ WWW.METROCOUNCIL.ORG
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
Change in City and Township Population, 2000 -10
Lost 500 or more
i '
Lost up to 499
Gained up to 499
ex
0 Gained 500 to 2,499
�
® Gained 2,500 to 9,999
- Gained 10,000 or more
Q
N
0 5 10 15 20
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2000 (SF1 Corrected) and Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
Nearly all of the region's population growth is occurring in the second- and third -ring suburbs. Roughly 90
percent of the expansion occurred in developing suburbs which provide the planning, services and
amenities that both accommodate and encourage growth. Led by Shakopee's addition of 16,508 people
over the decade, five cities each added more than 10,000 people — Shakopee, Woodbury, Lakeville,
Blaine, and Maple Grove. Together, these cities added 68,206 people or nearly one -third of the decade's
net growth. In Minneapolis and St. Paul, new multifamily and attached housing developments have added
thousands of new housing units. At the same time, the central cities' housing gains have been offset by
foreclosures, family displacements, and a demographic shift toward empty -nest and non - family
households, with fewer people per housing unit. Between 2000 and 2010, Minneapolis gained 1,188
households but lost 169 residents. St. Paul lost 1,108 households and 1,772 residents over the decade.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH a 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL. MN 55101 1805 ■ I+'J'vV'A'h4ETRCCOVNC:L.ORu
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
Percent Change in City and Township Population, 2000 -10
Lost up to 66%
0 Gained up to 9.9%
Gained 10% to 24.9%
Gained 25% to 49.9%
Gained 50% to 74.9%
Gained 75% or more
0 5 10 15 20
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2000 (SFl Corrected) and Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
The six fastest - growing cities in the metropolitan area over the decade are Elko New Market, Mayer,
Rockford, Carver, Rogers, and Hugo — all of which more than doubled their population. Among cities with
at least 10,000 residents in 2000, the fastest growing are Shakopee, Farmington, Rosemount, Prior Lake,
Chaska, and Woodbury. Communities seeing population losses include the center cities, older suburbs
such as Anoka, Spring Lake Park and Vadnais Heights, and rural townships.
3
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH s 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH. ST. PAUL. MN 55101 -1 805 4 'l4 °lJVlY E T RUCUUNClL.ORG
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
Change in Population by Block Group, 2000 -10
0 5 10 15 20
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2000 (SFl Corrected) and Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
Examining the 2010 Census data at the census block group level reveals more of the subregional
dynamics of population change. Population growth correlates with the location of new residential
construction over the decade, including the fast - growing suburbs of Shakopee, Woodbury, and Maple
Grove and significant urban construction such as condominiums along the Minneapolis riverfront,
downtown St. Paul, and Excelsior and Grand in St. Louis Park.
4
METROPOLFAN COUNCIL I RESEARCH, ■ 390 ROBERT STREET NQRrH ST. PAIL, MN 55101-1805 ■ VrdV4V.METRQCQUNCIL.QRU
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
Change in Population by Block Group, 2000 -10
0 5 10 15 20
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2000 (SF1 Corrected) and Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
While the map on p. 4 reveals the broad dimensions of regional change, this map demonstrates that many
communities are experiencing both population growth and population loss. Population change occurs
primarily in areas with developable land as new housing attracts new residents — single - family detached
development in particular attracts families with children. Population loss transpires roughly a generation
subsequent to the initial development as those families become empty- nesters. Older communities —
such as Minneapolis, St. Paul and the inner -ring suburbs — tend to see denser redevelopment such as
new condominiums that attract smaller households.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 0 RESEARCH 4 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL. MN 55141 -1805 ■ V,'1N'JJ.Iv1ETROCOUNCIL.ORU
MetroStats;i
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
Population Density (persons per acre) by Block Group, 2010
0 to 1.9
2 to 3.9 j
4 to 5.9 1
t
6 to 7.9� —`�
to 9.9 t I
s- F
- 10 or more
e-4 ;
CA
El
•T �I
}
9 a
N I
J
0 5 10 15 20
Miles t
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
The central cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul have the highest population density with large swaths of
block groups at densities of more than 10 residents per acre. Older suburbs in the traditional first ring,
such as Richfield, St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale, and Columbia Heights, have pockets of relatively higher
density as well, while newer suburbs overall have less dense development.
6
MET ROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH 2 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL., MN 55101-1805 s tPlIPPAIM.-ETHOCOUNCIL.ORU
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
Population of Color, 2010
Less than 5,000
0 5,000 to 9,999
10,000 to 24,999
25,000 to 49,999
® 50,000 to 99,999
® 100,000 or more
0 5 10 15 20
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
The total population of color in the seven - county metropolitan area increased 52 percent from 2000 to
676,349 in 2010. The distribution varied widely across the metropolitan area. The population of color is
mostly concentrated in the core of the region —both in the central cities and in surrounding suburbs.
Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington, and Brooklyn Park have the highest absolute number of residents of
color in the metro area. Nine additional suburban communities have more than 10,000 residents of color
– Brooklyn Center, Burnsville, Eagan, Richfield, Woodbury, Plymouth, Eden Prairie, Maplewood, and
Blaine. Nineteen other communities have at least 5,000 residents of color.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH 2 3910 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL. RAN 55101 1805 w 'PltAJVVMETROCOUNCIL.URG
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region
Less than 5%
5% to 9.9%
10% to 19.9%
20% to 29.9%
® 30% to 39.9%
- 40% or more
Percent People of Color, 2010
(lamp
1"11 �1 -
Mdomr I Han WU I l FoMLeke 1 Ssn ®a
�maayul. �� moe
mayrm
sulrorornm
G-A
1
tlNflaw �lpyr
LeYe E4m �
I({YWq liaaeal NF
yye l II
3F1atw?m nekw+err«F Iaraa Fm1La"M1m to ®on rnnlvn TMm.
}r p Nw MenmtR . I H Nen
&ebbyTVR %NHeFe Twy. HO-1. Geivlake TVq. M_ 1 EurAaTr. I CW.RdM Msnptm MR
0 5 10 15 20
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
March 2011
The Census 2010 data reveal that 76 percent of the population is white non - Hispanic, compared to 83
percent in 2000 and 90 percent in 1990. Persons of color now comprise 24 percent of the region's
population and are settling in a larger number of neighborhoods and communities. In 73 cities, people of
color represented more than 10 percent of the community's population in 2010 compared to just six such
communities in 1990. Suburban Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park have higher percentages of people
of color than the central cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Residents of color had a significant presence
in first and second -ring suburbs of the region as well as in the central cities. In 11 communities, more than
one in three residents are people of color. In 11 additional suburbs, at least one in four residents is a
person of color.
8
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH 1 390 ROSERT STREET NORTH S PAUL. MN 55101 1 805 ■ WVV1oVMETR000UNCIL.ORG
Qma
Hdlvw JTVN.
Wf1aWxT Twp.
N4Ntlb!
n.
IdA.,
vaww
vma+. u.r
c.neenrvm
�; -
iaxawnrxn
mri
he
e.mnnnrv.
wnb«n Twn
uraAmedo My.
/ r " -y
Ha1iry
v)I -'
���,
-
snn Fnm'uo
Nf
N
ndc
�"S"
Mdomr I Han WU I l FoMLeke 1 Ssn ®a
�maayul. �� moe
mayrm
sulrorornm
G-A
1
tlNflaw �lpyr
LeYe E4m �
I({YWq liaaeal NF
yye l II
3F1atw?m nekw+err«F Iaraa Fm1La"M1m to ®on rnnlvn TMm.
}r p Nw MenmtR . I H Nen
&ebbyTVR %NHeFe Twy. HO-1. Geivlake TVq. M_ 1 EurAaTr. I CW.RdM Msnptm MR
0 5 10 15 20
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
March 2011
The Census 2010 data reveal that 76 percent of the population is white non - Hispanic, compared to 83
percent in 2000 and 90 percent in 1990. Persons of color now comprise 24 percent of the region's
population and are settling in a larger number of neighborhoods and communities. In 73 cities, people of
color represented more than 10 percent of the community's population in 2010 compared to just six such
communities in 1990. Suburban Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park have higher percentages of people
of color than the central cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Residents of color had a significant presence
in first and second -ring suburbs of the region as well as in the central cities. In 11 communities, more than
one in three residents are people of color. In 11 additional suburbs, at least one in four residents is a
person of color.
8
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ■ RESEARCH 1 390 ROSERT STREET NORTH S PAUL. MN 55101 1 805 ■ WVV1oVMETR000UNCIL.ORG
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
Percent of People of Color by Block Group, 2010
0% t0 4.9%
5% to 9.9% j
j 10% to 19.9% 1
20% t0 29.9% ! _
® 30% to 39.9% 1
40% or more s
A- I
L--d
0
0 4 s 12 16
Miles
- f' I\_
in ,I I?
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
Examining the 2010 Census data on race and ethnicity by block group demonstrates at a finer level of
detail the patterns of where populations of color reside in the metro area. While only Brooklyn Center is a
"majority minority" city — with the white population less than half the total population — "majority minority"
block groups occur in many parts of the region, including suburbs that overall are at least 80 percent white
such as Edina, Savage, and Eden Prairie. No block groups in either Brooklyn Center or Brooklyn Park
had less than 20 percent residents of color. Within both Minneapolis and St. Paul, some block groups are
over 80 percent residents of color and other block groups are over 80 percent white residents.
0
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL_ r RESEARCH 1 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL, MN 55 101 -1 80 5 ■ 'r`)WIV+.M.ETROCOUNCIL.ORG
1
MetroStats
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region March 2011
Change in White Population, 2000 -10
5,000 • °
® Increase
o Decrease 1,000
4.
0
•
°
O -e
o ,
° •
° ° o• , Oaf o 6 •
•o � e° o
o iG ° .° j �yg O a° o o •
4 a r °
• ¢
o °o .
°
Qo :oo
. eo
N e ••
5 0 ,5 Zo ❑
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2000 (SFl Corrected) and Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
As with total population change, most of the region's white population growth since 2000 occurred in
developing suburbs. Shakopee had three block groups with population gain of more than 1,000 white
residents each, which collectively had a white population growth of nearly 10,000. Woodbury, Maple
Grove, Rosemount, and Lakeville had three or more block groups with white population gain of more than
1,000. The central cities saw clusters of white population growth in areas with new residential
development. White population losses occurred throughout the central cities and developed suburbs.
Many of the suburbs seeing white population loss are older suburbs where the emptying nests of older
households have led to smaller households.
10
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL I RESEARCH • 390 ROBERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL, KtIN 55101 -1805 ■ WIMV METROCOUNCILORU
What the 2010 Census Tells Us about the Twin Cities Region
Change in Population of People of Color, 2000 -10
5,000
• Increase
o Decrease 1,000
o ref• �•• • ��
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2000 (SFl Corrected) and Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
March 2011
Gains and losses in populations of color from 2000 to 2010 are dispersed throughout the metro area. Of
16 block groups adding more than 1,000 residents of color, only one is in a central city. Four are in
Brooklyn Park while seven are in the fast - growing suburbs of Shakopee, Woodbury and Maple Grove,
indicating that new residential development is attracting both white and non -white populations. Fourteen
of the 16 block groups'losing more than 250 residents of color are in center city neighborhoods. (The
remaining two are in Brooklyn Park and the portion of Falcon Heights that contains the University of
Minnesota St. Paul campus.) Only two of these 16 neighborhoods added more than 100 white residents
over the decade.
11
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL r RESEARCH 0 39.0 RQ3ERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL. MN 55101 -1805 r 'V1;L`d1oVMETROCUUNOL ORG
v
e
_• � • ,.• rte• t -
r
.
4.
•
^a
N
e '• •
0 5 10 15 20
❑
Miles
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census 2000 (SFl Corrected) and Decennial Census 2010 (PL Data).
March 2011
Gains and losses in populations of color from 2000 to 2010 are dispersed throughout the metro area. Of
16 block groups adding more than 1,000 residents of color, only one is in a central city. Four are in
Brooklyn Park while seven are in the fast - growing suburbs of Shakopee, Woodbury and Maple Grove,
indicating that new residential development is attracting both white and non -white populations. Fourteen
of the 16 block groups'losing more than 250 residents of color are in center city neighborhoods. (The
remaining two are in Brooklyn Park and the portion of Falcon Heights that contains the University of
Minnesota St. Paul campus.) Only two of these 16 neighborhoods added more than 100 white residents
over the decade.
11
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL r RESEARCH 0 39.0 RQ3ERT STREET NORTH ST. PAUL. MN 55101 -1805 r 'V1;L`d1oVMETROCUUNOL ORG
11ft-11 / ' ~�I
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Anoka County Sheriff 2012 Budget Presentation
DATE: July 26, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The Anoka County Sheriff James Stuart and Chief Deputy Tom Wells will be present at the workshop to
present the proposed 2012 Anoka County Sheriff Law Enforcement Contract budget proposal.
DISCUSSION
The 2011 City of Andover Law Enforcement expenditure budget is $2,615,407 which is offset by a
Police State Aid revenue budget of $112,860 and School Liaison revenue budget of $83,988 reflecting a
net tax levy impact of $2,418,559.
The current Sheriff's contract provides for:
a. 80 hours per day of patrol service
b. 12 hours per day of service provided by a Community Service Officer
c. School Liaison Officers in the middle school and high school
d. Patrol Investigator
e. 50% of the Crime Watch Program's coordinator position.
It should be noted that the Sheriffs Department always provides the required number of deputies for all
hours contracted by the City. If the Sheriffs Department has a vacancy or a deputy is injured etc.., they
still provide the City with a deputy at straight time even though they may have to fill those hours with
overtime which at times may cost the Sheriffs Department additional, but is not billable per the contract.
Staff has had initial discussions with the Anoka County Sheriff on the 2012 contract discussing the
status quo for most services. Remaining at a status quo contract will reflect an increase in the law
enforcement budget of $35,394. Proposal is attached.
A City Council 2011 -2012 Service Delivery Goal is to "Explore opportunities with law enforcement
to improve community policing ". In response to that goal staff has secured pricing of increasing
the City's commitment to the Crime Watch Program from 20 hours per week to 40 hours per
week. If the Council was to elect to increase the commitment to 40 hours. the 2012 contract would
need an additional increase of $43,334. Proposal is attached.
ACTION REQUESTED
R.e Council is requested to receive a presentation, discuss and provide direction to staff.
submitted,
64Jj5
Andover - Cost Summary
January 2012 - December 2012
L PERSONNEL
A. Sworn Deputy Sheriff
1.) 16.80 Patrol Deputies 1,071,645
2.) 7 Overtime (Average hours /month per Deputy) 68,781
3.) 2 Liaison Officers 127,577
4.) 1 Patrol Investigator 64,688
B. Non -Sworn C.S.O. 69,204
Non -Sworn C.S.O. - Parks 8,216
C. Crime Watch Coordinator 20 hours /week 24,325
Benefits for Sworn and Non -Sworn Personnel
Total Benefits 603,652
TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS
II. VEHICLE
A. Police Equipped Vehicles 4 Squads
B. C.S.O. Vehicle 1 Vehicle
C.S.O. Vehicle - Parks 1 Vehicle 1l2 Year
C. Liaison Vehicle 2 Vehicle
D. Crime Watch Coordinator Vehicle - 1/2
E. Patrol Investigator Vehicle
F. Total Maintenance Costs for all vehicles
1.) Vehicle
2.) Emergency & Communications Equipment
3.) Emergency Vehicle Equip. repic fee
4.) Insurance
5.) Cellular Telephone
Total Maintenance Costs
TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS
Ill. Administrative Costs & Crime Watch Program Costs
Administrative, Clerical, Etc.
IV. TOTAL COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
*Less Amount Received From State for Police State Aid
NET COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
210,163
15,832
2,500
22,950
4,620
114,000
7,200.00
3,600.00
14,400.00
2,850.00
7,200.00
256,065
$405;315
$207,399
$2,650,801
112,860
$2,537,941
'This figure is determined by the State and is subject to fluctuation.
The latest estimate is $5,700 per Deputy. Revenue received is for previous year Deputy hours hired prior to July 1
Detail Attached
`P —
943
Andover Eighty Hour Coverage 365 DAYSIYEAR
January 2012 - December 2012 Twelve Hours C.S.O. 365 DAYSIYEAR
Park CSO Twenty Hours/Week -
April Through September
L PERSONNEL
A. Sworn Deputy Sheriff
1.) 16.80 Deputies at $5,316 /month
$398,385
$1,071,645
2.) 7 Overtime (Average hours /month per Deputy)
68,781
3.) 2 Liaison Officer
IV. TOTAL COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
127,577
4.) 1 Patrol Investigator
112,860
64,688
B. Non-Sworn C.S.O.
69,204
Non -Swom C.S.O. - Parks
8,216
C. Benefits for Sworn and Non -Swom Personnel
P.E.R.A. (Sworn)
191,908
P.E.R.A. (Non- Sworn)
5,613
FICA
5,923
Medicare
19,324
Severance Allowance
34,126
Unemployment Compensation
2,115
Life Insurance
832
Health Insurance
277,418
Dental Insurance
9,445
Long Term Disability Insurance
2,932
Worker's Compensation
21,293
Uniforms
21,082
Total Benefits
592,009
TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS
$2,002,120
II. VEHICLE
A. Police Equipped Vehicles 4 Squads
114,000
B. C.S.O. Vehicle 1 Vehicle
7.200.00
C.S.O. Vehicle - Parks 1 Vehicle 1/2 Year
3,600.00
C. Liaison Vehicle 2 Vehicle
14,400.00
D. Investigator Vehicle 1 Vehicle
7,200.00
D. Maintenance Costs
1.) Vehicle
207,613
2.) Emergency & Communications Equipment & replc.fee
15,832
3.) Emergency Vehicle Equipment replc. Fee
2,500
4.) Insurance
21,600
5.) Cellular Telephone
4,440
Total Maintenance Costs
251,985
TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS
$398,385
Ill. Administrative Costs
Administrative, Clerical, Etc.
$200,212
IV. TOTAL COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
$2,600,716
"Less Amount Received From State for Police State Aid
112,860
NET COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
$2,487,856
'This figure is determined by the State and is subject to fluctuation.
The latest estimate is $5,700 per Deputy. Revenue received is for previous year Deputy hours hired prior to August t
—IS
�ZA7�
Andover Crime Watch Coordinator
January 2012 - December 2012 Average 20 Hours /Per Week 260 DAYSNEAR
I. PERSONNEL
A. Civilian
1.) 1 Crime Watch Coordinator
B. Benefits for Non -Sworn Personnel
P.E.R.A. (Non- Sworn)
FICA
Severance Allowance
Unemployment Compensation
Life Insurance
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Long Term Disability Insurance
Worker's Compensation
Uniforms
Total Benefits
TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS
II. VEHICLE
A. Crime Watch Coordinator
B. Maintenance Costs
1.) Vehicle
2.) Cell Phone
3.) Insurance
Total Maintenance Costs
TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS
III. Administrative Costs
Administrative, Office Space, Office Supplies, Etc.
IV. Program Costs
V. TOTAL COST OF CRIME WATCH PROGRAM
VI. CRIME WATCH PROGRAM
City Of Andover 50 %
NET COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
,N-
3,527
3,722
1,314
73
40
14,011
477
107
15
0
1 Vehicle leased annually
5,100
360
2,700
$100,169
$50,085
$50,085
I43
�{-- 20 6 fs
Andover - Cost Summary
�; M -e
1`
January 2012 - December 2012
VJ V
f ,�
I. PERSONNEL
A. Sworn Deputy Sheriff
1.) 16.80 Patrol Deputies
1,071,645
2.) 7 Overtime (Average hours /month per
Deputy)
68,781
3.) 2 Liaison Officers
127,577
4.) 1 Patrol Investigator
64,688
B. Non -Sworn C.S.O.
69,204
Non -Sworn C.S.O_ - Parks
8,216
C. Crime Watch Coordinator 40 hours /week
48,650
Benefits for Sworn and Non -Sworn Personnel
Total Benefits
615,294
TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS
$2,ti74055
II. VEHICLE
A. Police Equipped Vehicles 4 Squads
114,000
B. C.S.O. Vehicle 1 Vehicle
7,200.00
C.S.O. Vehicle - Parks 1 Vehicle 1/2 Year
3,600.00
C. Liaison Vehicle 2 Vehicle
14,400.00
D. Crime Watch Coordinator Vehicle - 1/2 cost
2,850.00
E. Patrol Investigator Vehicle
7,200.00
F. Total Maintenance Costs for all vehicles
1.) Vehicle
210,163
2.) Emergency & Communications Equipment
15,832
3.) Emergency Vehicle Equip. replc fee
2,500
4.) Insurance
22,950
5.) Cellular Telephone
4,800
Total Maintenance Costs
256,245
TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS
$4,5;49, -
III. Administrative Costs & Crime Watch Program Costs
Administrative, Clerical, Etc.
$2141586
IV. TOTAL COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY $2,694,135
*Less Amount Received From State for Police State Aid 112,860
NET COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY $2,581,275
*This figure is determined by the State and is subject to fluctuation.
The latest estimate is $5,700 per Deputy. Revenue received is for previous year Deputy hours hired prior to July 1
Detail Attached
Andover Eighty Hour Coverage 365 DAYSIYEAR
January 2012 - December 2012 Twelve Hours C.S.O. 365 DAYSIYEAR
Park CSO Twenty Hours/Week -
April Through September
L PERSONNEL
A. Sworn Deputy Sheriff
F.
1.) 16.80 Deputies at $5,316 /month
$398,385
$1,071,645
2.) 7 Overtime (Average hours /month per Deputy)
68,781
3.) 2 Liaison Officer
IV. TOTAL COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
127,577
4.) 1 Patrol Investigator
112,860
64,688
S. Non -Sworn C.S.O.
69,204
Non -Sworn C.S.O. - Parks
8,216
C. Benefits for Sworn and Non -Sworn Personnel
P.E.R.A. (Sworn)
191,908
P.E.R.A. (Non -Swom)
5,613
FICA
5,923
Medicare
19,324
Severance Allowance
$4,126
Unemployment Compensation
2,115
Life Insurance
832
Health Insurance
277,418
Dental Insurance
9,445
Long Term Disability Insurance
2,932
Worker's Compensation
21,293
Uniforms
21,082
Total Benerfts
592,009
TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS
$2,002;120
II. VEHICLE
A. Police Equipped Vehicles 4 Squads
114,000
B. C.S.O. Vehicle 1 Vehicle
7,200.00
C.S.O. Vehicle - Parks 1 Vehicle 112 Year
3,600.00
C. Liaison Vehicle 2 Vehicle
14,400.00
D. Investigator Vehicle 1 Vehicle
7,200.00
D. Maintenance Costs
1.) Vehicle
207,613
2.) Emergency & Communications Equipment & rep[c.fee
15,832
3.) Emergency Vehicle Equipment replc. Fee
2,500
4.) Insurance
21,600
5.) Cellular Telephone
4,440
Total Maintenance Costs
259,985
TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS
$398,385
III. Administrative Costs
Administrative, Clerical, Etc.
$206,212
IV. TOTAL COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
$2,600,716
*Less Amount Received From State for Police State Aid
112,860
NET COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
$2,487,856
'This figure is determined by the State and is subject to fluctuation.
The latest estimate is $6,700 per Deputy. Revenue received is for previous year Deputy hours hired prior to August 1
W
63
Andover Crime Watch Coordinator
January 2012 - December 2012 Average 40 Hours /Per Week 260 DAYSIYEAR
L PERSONNEL
A. Civilian
1.) 1 Crime Watch Coordinator
B. Benefits for Non -Sworn Personnel
P.E.R.A. (Non - Sworn)
FICA
Severance Allowance
Unemployment Compensation
Life Insurance
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Long Term Disability Insurance
Worker's Compensation
Uniforms
Total Benefits
TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS
II. VEHICLE
A. Crime Watch Coordinator
B. Maintenance Costs
1.) Vehicle 1/2 costing
2.) Cell Phone
3.) Insurance 1/2 costing
Total Maintenance Costs
TOTAL VEHICLE COSTS
III. Administrative Costs
Administrative, Office Space, Office Supplies, Etc.
IV. Program Costs
V. TOTAL COST OF CRIME WATCH PROGRAM
NET COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY
3,527
3,722
1,314
73
40
14,011
477
107
15
0
1 Vehicle leased annually 1/2 cost
2,550
360
1,350
:. e
23,285
$71,035
2,850
4,260
$7;110
$7,374
$7,000
$93,419
$93,419
City of Andover
Budget Detail for all Object Codes
(List each expense account individually with specific cost detail)
Department / Cast Center: Police Protection - 42100
Object
Code
Explanation
Amount Requested
Total
2012
Request
Priority
1 through 5
1 -high : 5 -low
2011
Budget
2012
Adjustment
63010
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,615,407
2;615,407
Current level contract proposal - 1.35%
0
35,394
35,394
Crime Watch Coordinator - 40 hrs /wk
0
43,334
43,334
0
0
0
0
Total
2,615,407
78,728
2,694,135-
Grand Total for all Expenditures
$2,615,407
1 $78,728
1 $2,694,135
300N
Page 1 of 1
1W L ILNDOVE
• �`J (T �
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
SUBJECT: City Sanitary Sewer & Water Utilities Update - Engineering
DATE: July 26, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The City Council has requested to review the City's sanitary sewer and municipal water system.
DISCUSSION
At the meeting staff will review the current sanitary sewer and water system and discuss future
improvements that will be required to provide service within the current MUSA boundary.
Detailed utility maps will be available at the meeting to assist in the discussion.
ACTION REQUIRED
This is for information and no direction is required at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
David D. Berkowitz
I' - .,..,.,.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
2011 Budget Implementation Progress & June 2011 Investment Report
July 26, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The overall City of Andover 2011 Budget contains total revenues of $28,910,245 and total expenditures
of $30,785,805. The $1,875,560 of expenditures over revenues is largely due to prepaying debt in order
to save on interest expenditures.
The 2011Budget includes a total property tax levy of $10,856,299: $7,500,802 (69.09 %) operational
levy, $1,929,112 (17.77 %) debt service levy, and $1,426,385 (13.14 %) capital/watershed levy. This
reflects a zero percent gross levy increase as compared to the 2010 budget.
DISCUSSION
The following represents City Administration directives and departmental expectations for 2011:
1. Expenditure budgets while approved, expenses are to meet with the spirit that needs are fulfilled
first, expansions of service and special requests are to be reviewed with City Administration
before proceeding.
2. Departments are committed to search for the best possible prices when purchasing, goods and
services.
3. Departments are committed to continually searching out new efficiencies and to challenge the
status quo of how the City provides services.
4. Departments are committed to searching out collaborative opportunities with our neiIzhborin g
government agencies to facilitate efficient and cost- effective utilization of governmental assets
and personnel.
5. Departments are committed to developing effective consistent and ongoing communications with
City residents, businesses and other stakeholders.
The following attachments are provided to assist discussion in reviewing 2011 progress; other
documents may be distributed at the meeting:
1. General Fund Expenditure Budget Summary -Budget Year 2011 through June 2011
2. Investment Maturities Summary —June 2011 (Investments managed by City Treasurer)
ACTION REQUESTED
Council is requested to receive a presentation and provide direction to staff.
submitted,
§
)
I IF
\
\
\
} / «
% 4
\
ON
k
>-
\
�
§
)
_
( -
\
\
0\
cq
)
-
-
°
® )
.
/ §
w«
°
}
-
(
cq
.\�
$
\
}
} / «
% 4
\
�
k
cq
�
§
( -
\
\
0\
cq
)
-
-
°
® )
.
/ §
cq
2 /
$
\
}
- \ /
CD
GS
i
r
.
r
r-
)
�
�\
,
/
t
\±
®
§ |
)\k
\
4
»
2
~
_§
}
\
ƒ
u
2 �
} / «
% 4
\
k
�
/
/
\
® )
/ §
cq
CD
GS
i
r
.
r
r-
�
§
�
.
!
\
\
_\
w
00
m
a
} / «
% 4
d
�
�
�
\
3
\
2
�
/
�
�
V
!�
�
�
�
a
\
k
�
/
/
\
® )
/ §
d
�
�
�
\
3
\
2
�
/
�
�
V
!�
�
�
�
a
CITY OF ANDOVER
General Fund Budget Summary Totals
Budget Year 2011
REVENUES
1
2010
1
1
2011
Budget
Jun YTD
% of Bud
Final
Budget
Jun YTD
% of Bud
General Property Tax
$ 7,308,495
$ -
0%
$ 7,191,602
$ 7,217,219
$ -
0%
Licenses and Permits
237,055
143,622
61%
329,901
250,080
127,875
51%
Intergovernmental
567,498
275,545
49%
570,097
558,215
- 280,262
50%
Charges for Services
543,500
289,908
53%
755,184
.580,200
294,025
51%
Fines
100,750
52,163
52%
104,780
105,750
43,813
41%
Investment Income
65,000
5,555
9%
70,368
65,000
6,023
9%
Miscellaneous
83,400
86,977
104%
136,684
84,900
92,206
109%
.Transfers hr
196,930
196,930
100%
196,930
196,930
196,930
100%
Total Revenues,
$ 9,102,628.
S 1,050,700 -
12%
S 9,355,546
$ 9,058,294.
S 1,041,134
11%
EXPENDITURES
2010
2011
Budget
Jun YTD
% of Bud
Final -
Budget
Jun YTD
% of Bud
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor and Council
$ 104,251
$ 53,543
51%
$ 100,710
$ 106,956
$ 53,881
50%
Administration
132,967
59,200
45%
131,218
138,157
64,258
47%
Newsletter
23,000
10,314
45%
17,094
27,500
12,577
46%
Human Resources
60,744
6,728
11%
54,968
36,221
7,250
20%
Attorney
178,500
71,805
40%
172,775
178,300
71,447
40%
City Clerk
96,828
45,854
47%
95,166
103,333
49,226
48%
Elections -
49,126
2,943
6%
37,927
6,750
3,142
47%
Finance
202,011
109,882
54%
194,865
212,967
115,512
54%
Assessing
152,500
-
0%
144,760
152,500
51
0%
Information Services
150,812
62,565
41%
136,931
154,871
69,028
45%
Planning & Zoning
328,449
158,175
48%
327,566
355,258
149,991
42%
Engineering
390,087
181,969
47%
389,037
414,408
200,964
48%
Facility Management
571,716
208,944
37%
421,850
553,739
217,909
39%
Total General Gov _
2,440,991
971,922
40%
2,224,867
2,440,960
..1,015,236
42%
PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Protection
2,599,246
1,299,623
50%
2,599,246
2,615,407
1,307,703
50%
Fire Protection
1,070,385
439,269
41%
967,716
1,077,084
435,980
40%
Protective Inspection
346,282
156,613
45%
330,709
363,789
166,372
46%
Civil Defense
15,909
1 1,698
74%
15,450
16,463
10,569
64%
Animal Control
9,970
2,400
24%
6,952
9,970
5,264
53%
Total Public Safety _
4,041,792
1,909,603
47%
3,920,073
4,082,713 ,.
1,925,888
47%
PUBLIC WORKS
Streets and Highways
556,452
247,326
44%
518,989
578,050
255,121
44%
Snow and Ice Removal
489,381
265,216
54%
537,948
489,315
287,412
59%
Street Signs
195,562
95,850
49%
166,244
196,712
82,699
42%
Traffic Signals
36,000
8,409
23%
25,830
36,000
8,313
23%
Street Lighting
36,400
13,317
37%
30,885
36,400
13,412
37%
Street Lights - Billed
200,000
75,564
38%
186,320
206,000
76,305
37%
Park & Recreation
872,633
343,313
39%
827,910
916,832
383,056
42%
Recycling
118,838
46,786
39%
109,034
122,273
52,201
43%
Total Public Works ,..
2,505,266....
1,095,781
44%
2,403,160
2,581,582
1,158,519
45%
OTHER
170,079
18,691
11%
24,953
45,000
17,405
- 39%
Total Other _
170,079 ..
18,691 _
11%
24,953
45,000 _
17,405 -
39%
Total Expenditures
$ 9,158,128
S 3,995,997
44%
S 8,573,053
$ .9,150,255
$ .4,117,048
45%
NET INCREASE (DECREASE)
$ (55,500)
$ (2,945,297)
$ 782,493
S (91,961)
$ (3,075,914)
A ,
NDOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
2012 -2016 CIP Development Discussion/Update
July 26, 2010
INTRODUCTION
In late March, Administration/Finance distributed baseline worksheets to Department Heads as a 2012-
2016 CIP kick -off. Subsequent discussion has centered on the need of other committees (Vehicle
Purchasing & Facility Management Committees) and commissions (Parks and Recreation & Community
Center Advisory) to start their work and adhere to the 2012 -2016 CIP development Calendar (attached)
DISCUSSION
Throughout the summer a significant amount of time is being spent on evaluating water /sewer
infrastructure, transportation improvements, building maintenance, equipment and park and recreation
needs. Each of these items will be supported by a detailed analysis of funding sources (based on various
assumptions and estimates) that will be presented to the Council for review at workshops. This evening
the Sanitary Sewer and Water Utilities will be discussed in detail as a separate agenda item.
At this time the Staff would like to update the Council on staWcommittee /commission progress for
the current "draft" 2012 -2016 CIP Projects (attached) to date. Also staff will review with the
Council current assumptions on funding sources for capital project (attached).
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a brief presentation, discuss funding assumptions and provide
�r
ens
wh`4
W
r�I
YV
0
6>
OA
U
U `O
O
N
N
O
N
w
Q
U p
U p
U x x x U
H
°°
b y b •cc
� .Cti � coo U N N N RS
V 4
rz
U > U u iw U A [ A A U Q A
0
O nj
cq, N N C14 N N N
Y�1
N N
N
7
to
O
O
O
Y
x
❑O ❑O
O
r
y d
�
ti
ti
ti
ti
O
N
U
N
M
O
�
O
N
00
O
O
N
00
O
3
O
U
'4= 0
u
N
N
_•
U
0
N
U
0
°q
.�
U
UU
•,t
w
y
O
W
o
0
q
w
O
w
3
>
�
F
N
t
a
O
�
.
O
N
N
d
s7o.
8
N
N
o
YAq
o
�
,.pc
A
0
0
0
0
U
•U
U
Y
�I
a
p
U
U
U
U
O
U
U
U
U
U
y
y
�
�
Q
O
d
u
U
U
ti
0A
u
0
c
3
' V
U
el
O
N
N
W
y
a
U
1-0
y
�
O
Cd
P-i
u?
"0
>
ul
Cc)
o
7J
A
aYi
.D
pa
N
0
U
c
aoi
lO
U
a.
N
A
,N+
°'
a
R�
A
y
Y
>
iL
F7q
zi
.N.
N
y
�
Y
x
Y
"❑
°
A
y
3
.�
v
U
CC,,
U
b
N
p
sU.
Y
aoi
Fes-!
ap+
o
Y
}p,
U
p
b
�
'p
c
a
o
U
cyd�
o
I-1
U
b
a
O,
5
tO
O
$
•>
LYi
b
o
U
A
U
9
•0
o
C
o
Z,
U
y
2
u
"o
rz
U
d!
a
F
y
U
0
p,
U
4^
�
•�
i�
4
4)
0
U
y
a
o
N
m
Q%
p
Fdl
o
Uon
.�
0
O nj
cq, N N C14 N N N
Y�1
N N
N
7
to
O
O
O
x
❑O ❑O
O
r
y d
�
ti
ti
ti
ti
O
N
b
a
x
.yn
r
O
.�
Y
O
N
U
N
M
O
�
O
N
00
O
O
N
00
O
3
O
U
'4= 0
u
N
N
_•
U
0
N
U
0
°q
.�
U
UU
•,t
w
y
O
W
o
0
q
w
O
w
3
>
�
F
N
t
a
O
�
.
O
N
N
d
s7o.
8
N
N
o
YAq
o
�
,.pc
A
0
0
0
0
U
•U
U
U
a
p
U
U
U
U
W
U
U
U
U
f
a
.yn
O
.�
U
ON
O
N
U
N
M
O
�
O
N
00
O
O
N
00
O
3
O
U
'4= 0
u
N
N
_•
U
0
N
U
0
°q
.�
U
UU
•,t
w
y
O
W
o
0
q
w
O
w
3
>
�
F
N
t
a
O
�
.
O
N
N
d
s7o.
8
N
N
o
YAq
o
�
,.pc
U
O
U
•U
U
U
a
p
U
U
U
�
U
0
U
0
�'
U
f
O
N
0
N
M
O
N
O
N
00
O
O
N
00
O
Q
d
�
vi
Y
O
Y
O
f
City of Andover, MN
Capital Plan
2012 thru 2016
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Central Equipment
Replacement - Hotly Pressure Washer
14 -08800 -01
3
22,500
7,000
New Development Projects
7,000
Equipment Bond
115,000
Water Trunk Fund
150,000
7,000
121}1600 -02
7,000
Replacement - Service Truck
14 -48800 -02
2
Municipal State Aid Funds
40,000
Engineering Total
40,000
Equipment Bond
40,000
Facility Management
Surface Seal all Brick Structures
40,000
Capital Projects Levy
40,000
Replacement - Floor Sweeper
15 -08800 -01
3
56,000
68,000
35,000
35,000
Equipment Bond
1 55,000
35,000
35,000
Central Equipment Total
47,000
35,000
82,000
166,000
183,000
216,000
218,000
981,000
Community Center
Replacement - Carpet/Flooring
13 -04000 -01
1
10,000
10,000
Comm Ctr Operations
10,000
10,000
Replacement - Ice Edger
13 -04300 -02
1
8,000
8,000
Comm Ctr Operations
8,000
8,000
Replacement - Rink Boards
15 -04300 -W
2
12,000
12,000
Comm Ctr Operations
12,000
11,000
Community Center Total
18,000
12,000
30,000
Elections
Replacement - Voting Equipment
13 -01310 -01
1
110,000
110,000
State Grant
110,000
110,000
Elections Total
110,000
21,500
22,500
Engineering
New Development Projects
12 41600 -01
Sewer Trunk Fund
115,000
Water Trunk Fund
150,000
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
121}1600 -02
Road 8 Bridge Funds
90,000
Bunker Lake Boulevard Trail
12 -01600 -03
Municipal State Aid Funds
18,000
Engineering Total
25,000
30,000
40,000
Facility Management
Surface Seal all Brick Structures
1241900 -01
Capital Projects Levy
76,000
Comm CG Operations
326,000
Water Fund
56,000
1 75,000
110,000
21,500
22,500
32,000
110,000
1 85,000
110,000
115,000
140,000
150,000
600,000
67,000
22,000
90,000
110,000
110,000
399,000
18,000
88,000
25,000
30,000
40,000
201,000
1 58,000
56,000
68,000
76,000
68,000
326,000
58,000
56,000
68,000
74000
68,000
326,000
1 55,000
55,000
55,000
55,000
198,000
166,000
183,000
216,000
218,000
981,000
1 75,000
75,000
21,500
22,500
32,000
32,000
20,500
_ 20,500
Department
Project#
Priority
2012
2013
2014 2015
2016
Total
Roof Replacements
12 41900 -03
1
300,000
Replacement- Rescue #11
12 -02200 -02
2
300,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
13,000
300,000
Replacement- Hydraulic Rescue Cutters
12- 42200 -03
1
300,000
Annual Parking Lot Maintenance
12 -01900 -04
1
25,000
26,000
27,000 28,000
130,000
236,000
Capital Projects Levy
45,000
25,000
26,000
27,000 28,000
30,000
136,000
Comm Ctr Operations
45,000
340,000
Replacement - Grass #31
14 42200 -01
100,000
100,000
Land Purchase
1341900 -01
1
40,000
1,500,000
14 -02200 -02
2
1,500,000
Building Fund
-
32,000
31000
1,500,000
14-42200 -03
2
1,500,000
Building A - Seal Floor
1341900-02
1
20,000
9,000
10,000
2
19,000
Capital Projects Levy
9,000
10,000
2
19,000
Carpet/ Tile Replacement
13- 41900 -03
2
10,000
10,000
2
20,000
Capital Projects Levy
10,000
10,000
1
20,000
Addition4o Storage Building & Vehicle Maint. Shop
15 -01900 -01
1
3,000,000
3,000,000
G.O. Bond
3,000,000
3,000,000
Recycling Building & Fence
15- 41900 -02
1
300,000
300,000
G.O. Bond
300,000
300,000
Attached Storage Building
15-41900 -03
1
300,000
300,000
G.O. Bond
300,000
300,000
Relocate Fuel Station w/ Canopy
1541900 -04
2
300,000
300,000
G.O. Bond
300,000
300,000
Fire St. #2 Addition with additional land purchase
15111900 -05
2
885,000
885,000
G.O. Bond
885,000
885,000
Pedestrian Tunnel Under Crosstown Blvd.
15 41900 -06
1
450,000
450,000
G.O. Bond
450,000
450,000
Facility Management Total
400,000 1,545,000 27,000 5,283,000 130,000 7,385,000
Fire
45,000
Replacement - Fire Chiefs Vehicle
12 -02200 -01
2
45,000
Equipment Bond
45,000
Replacement- Rescue #11
12 -02200 -02
2
55,000
Equipment Bond
13,000
55,000
Replacement- Hydraulic Rescue Cutters
12- 42200 -03
1
13,000
Equipment Bond
1,200,000
13,000
New - Thermal Imaging Camera
12 -02200 -04
1
20,000
Equipment Bond
45,000
20,000
Replacement - Ladder Truck #11
13- 42200 -01
1
45,000
Equipment Bond
45,000
340,000
Replacement - Grass #31
14 42200 -01
2
340,000
Equipment Bond
40,000
40,000
Replacement - Grass #21
14 -02200 -02
2
32,000
Equipment Bond
32,000
31000
Replacement - Tan ker #11
14-42200 -03
2
Equipment Bond
31000
20,000
Replacement - Fire Marshall Vehicle
14 -02200 -04
2
20,000
Equipment Bond
Replacement - Utility #4
1542200 -01
2
Equipment Bond
Replacement- Utility #5
1542200 -02
2
Equipment Bond
New - Water /Ice rescue boat
15 -02200 -03
1
Equipment Bond
Li
45,000
45,000
55,000
55,000
13,000
13,000
20,000
20,000
600,000 600,000
1,200,000
600,000 600,000
1,200,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
340,000
340,000
340,000
340,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
32,000
32,000
32,000
31000
32,000
32,000
31000
31000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
Department
Project#
Priority
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Fire Total
133,000
600,000
1,070,000
84,000
1,887,000
Information Technology
Springbrook Version 7
1241420 -01
1
40,000
40,000
Capital Projects Levy
40,000
40,000
Information Technology Total
40,000
40,000
Park & Rec - Operations
Replace /Repair Play Structures - Various Parks
12 -05000 -01
1
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
225,000
Capital Projects Levy -
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
225,000
Replace /Repair Major Park Projects - VadousParks
12 -05000 -02
1
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
125,000
Capital Projects Levy
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
125,000
New - Cab and Snow Blower Attachment
1245000 -03
1
9,000
9,000
Equipment Bond
1500
4,500
Sanitary Sewer Fund
4,500
4,500
New - Trail Plow Attachment
12- 45000 -04
1
5,600
5,600
Equipment Bond
5,600
5,600
Replacement -10 Ft Wide Trail Mower #583
12- 45000 -05
1
65,000
65,000
Equipment Bond
65,000
65,000
Replacement- One Ton Truck w/ Plow #599
13 -05000 -01
2
65,000
65,000
Equipment Bond
65,000
65,000
Replacement - Trailer #T -554
13- 45000 -02
2
10,000
10,000
Equipment Bond
10,000
10,000
Replacement- One Ton Truck w/ Plow #503
1445000 -01
2
65,000
65,000
Equipment Bond
65,000
65,000
Replacement - Bobcat #610
14 -05000 -02
2
36,000
36,000
Equipment Bond
36,000
36,000
Replacement - Toro Groundsmaster #559
15 -05000 -01
1
23,000
23,000
Equipment Bond
23,000
23,000
Replacement- One Ton Crew Cab Pickup #502
16 -05000 -01
1
50,000
50,000
Equipment Bond
50,000
50,000
Park & Rec - Operations Total
149,600
145,000
171,000
93,000
120,000
678,600
Park & Rec - Projects
Annual Miscellaneous Park Projects
1245001 -01
1
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
75,000
Park Dedication Funds
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
75,000
Sunshine Park -West Parking Lot
12 -05001 -02
We
35,000
35,000
Park Dedication Funds
35,000
35,000
Hickory Meadows
1245001 -03
n/a
25,000
25,000
Park Dedication Funds
25,000
25,000
Irrigation Project - Small
1245001 -04
n/a
5,000
5,000
Park Dedication Funds
5,000
5,000
Park Redesign / Major Irrigation Improvements
13-05001 -01
2
200,000
200,000
Park Dedication Funds
200,000
200,000
Park & Rec - Projects Total
80,000
15,000
15,000
215,000
15,000
340,000
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary Sewer Extensions
1248200 -01
1
270,000
500,000
770,000
Assessments
470000
210,000
Department
Project#
Priority
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Sewer Trunk Fund
500,000
500,000
Radio System Upgrade
12- 48200 -02
1
21,400
21,400
Sanitary Sewer Fund
21,400
21,400
Replacement - 314 Ton Truck wl Plow #90
13 48200 -01
1
65,000
65,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund
65,000
65,000
Replacement - One Ton Truck wl Plow #94
13- 48200 -02
2
65,000
65,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund
32,500
3Z500
Storm Sewer Fund
32,500
32,500
Replacement - JeWac Truck #99
14 -08200 -02
1
357,000
357,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund
178,500
178,500
Sewer Trunk Fund
178,500
178,500
Yellow Pine Lift Station
15 -08200 -01
1
650,000
650,000
Sewer Trunk Fund
650,000
650,000
Rural Reserve Trunk Sanitary Sewer
15 418200 -02
1
2,250,000
1,250,000
3,500,000
Assessments
250,000
1,000,000
1,250,000
Sewer Revenue Bonds
2,000,000
250,000
2,250,000
Sanitary Sewer Total
291,400
130,000
357,000
3,400,000
1,250,000
5,428,400
Storm Sewer
Storm Sewer Improvements
12 -08300 -01
1
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
200,000
Storm Sewer Fund
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
200,000
Replacement - Elgin Street Sweeper #169
14-48300 -01
1
150,000
150,000
Equipment Bond
150,000
150,000
Storm Sewer Total
30,000
35,000
190,000
45,000
50,000
350,000
Streets / Highways
Annual Street Seal Coat Project
12 413100 -01
1
355,000
442,000
387,000
765,000
740,000
2,689,000
Construction Seal Coat Fund
4,000
10,000
20,000
34,000
Road &Bridge Funds
351,000
442,000
387,000
755,000
720,000
2,655,000
Annual Street Crack Seal Project
12 -03100 -02
1
110,000
103,000
191,000
167,000
205,000
776,000
Construction Seal Coat Fund
-
1,000
1,000
3,000
5,000
Road &Bridge Funds
110,000
103,000
190,000
16Q000
20 ;000
771,000
Annual Street Reconstruction
12- 43100 -03
1
753,000
700,000
804,000
856,000
850,000
3,963,000
Assessments
188,000
175,000
201,000
214000
215000
993,000
Road &Bridge Funds
565,000
525,000
603,000
642,000
635,000
2,910,000
Annual Pavement Markings
1243100 -04
1
25,000
26,000
27,000
29,000
31,000
138,000
Road& Bridge Funds
25,000
26,000
27,000
29,000
31,000
138,000
Annual Curb Replacement
12 -03100 -05
1
42,000
43,000
44,000
45,000
46,000
220,000
Road& Bridge Funds
_
42,000
43,000
44,000
45,000
46,000
220,000
Municipal State Aid Routes / New & Reconstruct
12 43100 -06
1
2,202,000
1,626,000
433,000
4,261,000
Assessments
220,000
65,000
285,000
Municipal State Aid Funds
1,982,000
1,561,000
433,000
3,976,000
Intersection Upgrades
12 -03100 -07
1
525,000
65,000
590,000
Municipal State Aid Funds
525,000
65,000
590,000
New- Front -End Loader
12 -03100 -08
1
140,000
140,000
Equipment Bond
140,000
140,000
Replacement- Ditch mowing tractor and mowers
13 -03100 -01
1
90,000
90,000
Equipment Bond
90,000
90,000
Replacement- One Ton Truck wl Plow #132
13-43100 -02
1
65,000
65,000
Equipment Bond
65,000
65,000
Replacement- Dump Track wl Snow Removal #198
14 -03100 -01
1
150,000
150,000
Equipment Bond
150,000
150,000
Department Project# Priority 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Replacement -Water Tanker #163
14 -03100 -02
2
100,000
100,000
Equipment Bond
100,000
100,000
Streets / Highways Total
4,152,000
3,095,000
2,201,000
1,862,000 1,872,000
13,182,000
Water
Rehabilitation of Wells
12 48100 -01
1
60,000
65,000
70,000
70,000
265,000
Water Fund
60,000
65,000
70,000
70,000
265,000
Water Main Improvements
12 48100 -02
1
1,052,000
710,000
1,762,000
Assessments
266,000
710,000
976000
Water Trunk Fund
786,000
784000
Radio System Upgrade
12- 48100 -03
1
28,600
28,600
Water Fund
28,600
28,600
WTP Generator Upgrade
13- 48100 -01
1
50,000
50,000
Water Fund
50,000
50,000
Water Meter Reading System AM]/AMR
15 -08100 -01
2
900,000
900,000
Water Fund
900,000
900,000
Water Total
1,140,600
115,000
70,000
1,680,000
3,005,600
GRAND TOTAL
6,614,600
5,974,000
4,331,000
12,925,000 3,655,000
33,499,600
1
I
City of Andover, MN
Capital Plan
2012 ffim 2016
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Source 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Assessments
944,000
240,000
201,000
1,174,000
1,215,000
3,774,000
Building Fund
1,500,000
1,500,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
300,000
300,000
Capital Projects Levy
157,500
115,000
97,000
118,000
100,000
587,500
Comm Ctr Operations
32,000
18,000
12,000
100,000
162,000
Construction Seal Coat Fund
4,000
1,000
11,000
23,000
39,000
Equipment Bond
348,100
830,000
1,618,000
142,000
50,000
2,988,100
G.O. Bond
5,235,000
5,235,000
Municipal State Aid Funds
2,562,000
1,561,000
498,000
4,621,000
Park Dedication Funds
80,000
15,000
15,000
215,000
15,000
340,000
Road & Bridge Funds
1,151,000
1,195,000
1,319,000
1,713,000
1,702,000
7,080,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund
25,900
97,500
178,500
301,900
Sewer Revenue Bonds
2,000,000
250,000
2,250,000
Sewer Trunk Fund
67,000
22,000
268,500
1,260,000
110,000
1,727,500
State Grant
110,000
110,000
Storm Sewer Fund
30,000
67,500
40,000
45,000
50,000
232,500
Water Fund
109,100
115,000
70,000
970,000
1,264,100
Water Trunk Fund
804,000
88,000
25,000
30,000
40,000
987,000
GRAND TOTAL 6,614,600 5,974,000 4,331,000 12,925,000 3,655,000 33,499,600
CITY OF ANDOVER
Trail Fund
Projected Fund Balance
2011 2012 _
Projected Sources of Revenue
Trail Fee $688 per unit
platted units - -
Trail Fee $ - $ - $
Total Revenues Available
Projected Commitments
Bunker Lake Blvd Trail 55,000
2013 2014
2015
2016
TOTALS
55,000
Total Commitments 55,000 $ 55,000
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (55,000)
Fund Balance as of December 31, 2010 71,547
Fund Balance Brought Forward 71,547 16,547 16,547 16,547 16,547
Ending Fund Balance • $ 71,647 $ 16,547 $ 16,647 $ 16,547 $ 16,547 $ 16,547
'Target • 10% of current years commitments to create a contingency for any project overages.
•• It is anticipated that all projects will not be fully expended by the end of the year, and future projects will be contingent on additional revenues.
1 f
CITY OF ANDOVER
Park Improvement Fund
Projected Fund Balance
"Target - $50,000 to create a contingency for any project overages.
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
TOTALS
Projected Sources of Revenue
Park Dedication Fee $2,935 per unit
platted units
-
_
_
-
Park Dedication Fee - Residential
$ -
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$
Park Dedication Fee - Commercial
51,706
-
-
$
-
-
-
51,706
Donation / Contribution
_
Capital Projects Levy - Park Improvements
61,500
61,500
61,500
61,500
61,500
61,500
369,000
Total Revenues Available
113,206
61,500
61,500
61,500
61,500
61,500
420,706
Projectetl Commitments
Hawkridge Park - Phase 1
5,794
Sophies Park
8,797
5,794
Prairie Knoll Park - Northern Natural Gas
1,963
8,797
Hidden Creek North Park - Tower Rental
2,350
1,963
Skate Board Park
58,000
2,350
Hawkridge Park - Phase 11
24,000
58,000
Sunshine Park - West Parking Lot
35,000
24,000
Hickory Meadows
25,000
35,000
Irrigation Project- Small
5,000
25,000
Park Redesign /Major Irrigation Project
5,000
200,000
200,000
Annual Miscellaneous Projects
15,000
15,000
15,000.
15,000
15,000
15,000
90,000
Total Commitments
115,904
80,000
15,000
15,000
215,000
15,000
455,904
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(2,698)
(18,500)
46,500
46,500
(153,500)
46,500
Fund Balance as of December 31, 2010
141,502
Fund Balance Brought Forward
138,805
120,305
166,805
213,305
59,805
Ending Fund Balance"
$ 138,805
$ 120,305
$ 166,805
$ 213,305
$ 59,805
$ 106,305
"Target - $50,000 to create a contingency for any project overages.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Road & Bridge Funds - Rollup
Projected Fund Balance
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
TOTALS
Projected Sources of Revenue
Est. Annual MSA Construction Allocation
$ 819,175
$ 1,014,024
$ 1,014,024
$ 1,014,024
$ 1,014,024
$ 1,014,024
$ 5,889,295
State Aid Street Bonds - Principal
(220,000)
(230,000)
(230,000)
(60,000)
-
-
(740,000)
Available MSA Construction
for Other Commitments
599,175
784,024
784,024
954,024
1,014,024
1,014,024
5,149,295
Est. Annual Maintenance Allocation
369,119
348,110
348,110
348,110
348,110
348,110
2,109,669
State Aid Street Bonds - Interest
(21,009)
(16,115)
(10,765)
(5,625)
-
-
(53,514)
General Fund Commitment
(196,274)
(202,162)
(208,227)
(214,474)
(220,908)
(227,535)
(1,269,581)
Available MSA Maintenance
for Other Commitments
151,836
129,833
129,118
128,011
127,202
120,575
786,575
Total MSA Available for other
Commitments
751,011
913,857
913,142
1,082,035
1,141,226
1,134,599
751,011
Federal Funds
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Assessments'
271,000
408,000
240,000
201,000
214,000
215,000
1,549,000
Tax Levy
1,119,885
1,079,391
1,084,363
1,109,620
1,135,567
1,162,227
6,691,053
Total Revenues Available
2,141,896
2,401,248
2,237,505
2,392,655
2,490,793
2,511,826
8,991,064
Projected Commitments
MSA - New& Reconstruct Routes
376,000
2,257,000
1,626,000
433,000
-
-
4,692,000
MSA - Intersection Upgrades
130,000
525,000
-
65,000
-
-
720,000
MSA - Transfer to Debt Service
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
R & B - Pavement Markings
23,000
25,000
26,000
27,000
29,000
31,000
161,000
R &B - Curb Replacement
41,000
42,000
43,000
44,000
45,000
46,000
261,000
R & B - New & Reconstruct Routes
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
R & B - Bridge Scour Repairs
45,000
-
-
-
-
-
45,000
R &B - Seal Coating
391,000
351,000
442,000
387,000
755,000
720,000
3,046,000
R & B -Crack Sealing
-
110,000
103,000
190,000
166,000
202,000
771,000
R &B - Overlays
708,000
753,000
700,000
804,000
856,000
850,000
4,671,000
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
55,000
58,000
56,000
68,000
76,000
68,000
381,000
Total Commitments
1,769,000
4,121,000
2,996,000
2,018,000
1,927,000
1,917,000
14,748,000
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
372,896
(1,719,752)
(758,495)
374,655
563,793
594,826
$ (5,756,936)
Fund Balance as of December 31, 2010
3,854,752
Fund Balance Brought Fonvard
4,227,648
2,507,896
1,749,401
2,124,056
2,687,849
Ending Fund Balance
$ 4,227,648
$ 2,507,896
$ 1,749,401
E 2,124,056
$ 2,687,849
$ 3,282,675
' Assuming collected in same year
V
11
1�
i
o �
•` W f
QI
W_
%J
W �
d c
C a
V �
Q a
Y
o O vl O
h
N r 07
o O e e
N O N
M
M r'�
l' O
V
m
ti
'O
C: O
O
O O
O O
W <
Oe
b
e C
a0
b M b
b b
b cM•i
� N
� I
N v
df (9 Vf N
G
U
K
o O h O Vl
O
O O W h
e e e o
5-
N W O
e N
N O b
'O O
Vl
O V) M
MCli
M b 41
vl vl O O
h N
y M
M O M
W O
N a
n u d n o
o
c
n o •o a 'S
N
N
a
a u'iz
69 W 69 d3
z
;'n n v vz
f9
2 U
U
G G
e O rn O vl
h
Oa N b 1�
o a o o
e vl vl
M O
O O l7
b O
l� t
O VI ^ M
O
e O Or M
Vl h O O
O O�
O N
w
N
a O h O h
O
N a0 ^ aD
o e e
O Vl M
[•i Ili
[�
4l M W
'Ir VI O
Oa
O
N M e
O
W
O•
N
N
v
df V) W K
W
O VI O
M
N
N
M VI Vi K
a•4
o O vl O
O
T O. N O
o 0
M
b' y' ay'
M Oa
e
N
o
N v
i
I
(�
v
W N W H
Yi
e Vl
N M e
N l� M O
0 0 0 0
O i^
M
a M_D
O
M h n M
r b
O M O O
vl r W W
Oa r
y h
h r N
Qr e
Oa h
h r
N
N v
v
I
Nf H (9 W
(9
o N
O e
Oa ti 0
lh l M
vl aD O
r b O
NI+1
0 o
O + e e
^ n O O
e yM O
O � lti
vt
e
ryj
Oa
O
CO W
O
Q
O
b
O
r0 ^
Cl
N
11 Vl Vl
N O
Vl a0
W 69 (9 9
K
0 0
0c;
�d I^
ti v O
o 00
O I
ry
v v
v
v
Z m
(9 W W W
Vf
o` a
0.
o
e Z m an
L U U
S Q6 zzfLUF C4 fA '.�U� !A aU¢�
0- -
a
g
G
U
5-
m
n u d n o
o
c
n o •o a 'S
,p o o
a
a u'iz
3 u`a.,
z
;'n n v vz
3
2 U
U
G G
U�
O
0- -
I1
�I
g %
% F
O O �
r n
N h M
N N
N N �
0 o n F
o C5 Ny"
O O P C
^ � f
O
m 00 0 a, c
C
a CC
r = rn
r P M
b W vl O C
N
C
aMO o m
C
�lm
I .
I �
Q
U
Y p
> U
v
V
'°V
Lq
V
Uo 3
M
V
N
P Y
O
V
O
0
U 6y 5 rn a O w
a 0 U w
S
n
O O
�ovo0
O O
3
0 0
0
N
v
{
°
W
N
f j
b
r
0 W O O
N b O O
''
Zi
•n
cs
k .a
(, » cs
i
O
V .r vt W
O
O
O
N
0
o
r
k
t9
W
n
c�a0b o
Vf
69 (A.
69
O N C O
M D\ O O
0
0 0 0
M
Oi O O
N
cs
.a
N
;.
n vi
W
N N
0 0 0 0
'O
�n
N
o
�h
O
M N V1
N
O O O O
tq
l�
N
O
c4 p
w
z=
n oo r
n o
Q �
¢
N
N � N
O
C vl
N
vmj
N
W
�I
g %
% F
O O �
r n
N h M
N N
N N �
0 o n F
o C5 Ny"
O O P C
^ � f
O
m 00 0 a, c
C
a CC
r = rn
r P M
b W vl O C
N
C
aMO o m
C
�lm
I .
I �
�3
Q
> A
�3 0
Q
U
Y p
> U
v
V
'°V
Lq
V
Uo 3
M
V
P
P Y
O
V
O
0
U 6y 5 rn a O w
a 0 U w
S
n
�3
Q
> A
�3 0
Q
°o
Y p
> U
v
V
'°V
4.
Uo 3
V
P Y
O
O
O
0
M
O
m m
n
O O
1
O O
O
0 0
0
v
{
°
N
f j
b
O O
�
Zi
•n
cs
k .a
(, » cs
i
rn
O
O
O
0
o
r
W
n
1
Vf
69 (A.
69
0
0 0 0
0 0
i]i]if
cs
.a
tp
r =:�l
;.
n vi
W
N N
1
'O
�n
N
o
�3
Q
> A
�3 0
Q
Y p
> U
v
V
'°V
4.
Uo 3
V
P Y
T
> > >
m m
O O
O
m
v
{
°
b
O O
Zi
•n
cs
k .a
(, » cs
i
rn
0 0
0
o
r
n
(9
Vf
69 (A.
69
b
cs
.a
tp
r =:�l
;.
n vi
cv
'O
�n
N
o
�h
tq
l�
N
O
�3
Q
> A
�3 0
Q
Y p
> U
v
� C
Uo 3
P Y
T
> > >
m m
O
v
°
F
�3
Q
> A
�3 0
R
L
W
y y
W�
� C
.°. W
a
� u
O A
R
E
W .d.
Q T
F �
U d R
VJ eA. C
R
.a
U1
N
r�
m y
N
O M �D o0 O ep O O O
C• O a
r`
O
O
h M
�
M � �O �� M •t �
O M b
O
O -�
ti
�
O
D\ M
N
O
•U
«
�>
i.
N
N v
N
N
69 69 69
�
a
p v
U
R
C y A
R oc, c
c
69
R N
a aoi
y
ti
O M M o0 00 O O O
O\ V'
vN1
O M
M
O
a N
M
N M l-
.-i
O h
M
B
b C•
M
•�
N _C
� � V 4
� OJ
R�
�
fC R
i y �
0-0
y
tO
N d
y
,�
L.
G 0 U
ep
H3 69 Vi
V3
Vi
O M O\ Oi n V O O O
C• l�
N O N
O O
O
O
O
O
h
N
M
�rx �U
c4 dU
a
g E E
Vl
O
N �
O
n
y
d d v o o
R c o
H
R o .°�.
.v.
r a� a s
•c F
F
O
CAM
vl
v
v
L)
L
0 N
N
v
"
(V
W
v
LL
69 69 69
69
-t
Fp
O M b Vt l� O O O
h N P
M
O N
N
O
O
O
b
n
Nj V d' b M V V
O O b
M
O h
h
h �
h
O
M b
On
�
�
N
69 69 69
fA
fA
e vi O V1 00 h V1 e a o
� C1 p
M
O O
O
O
O
O
N v1
r`
.M-i
O M N M M O O O
V) O Qi
b
O
c0
O
O
O
a0 W
b
M � T 4 4
?��
M
cw
O O
O
Q\ �
aw
O
M N
b
rl
N M
M
M
V
N
N
N
69 69 H3
5q
y�
O M D` b h O O O
T V ey
O
O o0
e0
O
W W�
b
b
b
b
N
.
Y
R
.n ss vi
cs
by
e o0 o ao 0
b
b
O b Qi M O
O
O
W
Cj P b M M N O
W
O lW O
O b
b
b
T
N
O
N
...
N
N
es zv ss
en
va
O m b O� b 0 h
0 0 0
M O
N
O oo
c0
N
N
b
O
Cli
M W M M
M
M
r
M M
r
b ^' � ^' 'n "� ��
b b M
b
O �D
b
C•
l�
O M
M
.^.i
N
N
Qv
(A 49 69
fA
yj
N b M O� O
C` V h
c0
O O
O
vt
v1
at
N W
O
O Obi D\ O H O
W ti P
O N
N
b
b
O
d'
b
C• v1 h
b
O vi
vi
b '
b
V
T M
M
O
W O N
�'
b
N
v
v
VN1
`s
im
.M.
W
(A 69 69
69
V3
m y
N
.' '
O
•U
«
�>
i.
a
p v
U
R
C y A
R oc, c
c
'�
a°i
R N
a aoi
y
ti
B
•�
N _C
� � V 4
� OJ
R�
�
fC R
i y �
0-0
y
tO
N d
y
,�
L.
G 0 U
ep
y
A¢ o❑ c o
ro
m '�
N O N
N
•i
N A C
y z
3 m z
3
.° UUb E¢
�rx �U
c4 dU
a
g E E
c
o,$
d d v o o
R c o
H
R o .°�.
.v.
r a� a s
•c F
F
S¢zzc4UF
amU¢
wU¢
w
v
L)
-t
4i
fA
69
t':'..j
e9 Ni
Y3
aC
T O'
b
V1 Qi O O O O
d'
00 O
a0
�D 1�
M
O O
69
69
fig
�. 69 fA 69
�
9
E!i
�
O
O O
O
H
h
co
f.9
�
h9
:..1 69 vi V3
69
I ili
O O
O O
O
O
yL�•
4
f: O
N
a T O N O O
M
O
O
b M
h
O O O O
�h
l
1:
i_.
N
N
M
M
V
M
N
°' `'"
�
q
v o d `v a
o 'YJ H
a F
"
fA
69
y 'J —° m E H
O N O O O
N
q
aQi
a�¢�s�xwo
W caU
O
l� l -� 0 0 0
.n
abb
O
O
n O
M
O
V c0 O O 0
�
W
c0
V1 00
M
O
V
a
fA
1
yy
y�
0
p� Vl
V1
p
�
v a0 O
V
W cl
N
c
N
�
�
�
vj
es
V b O O O
M O 0 0 '
ti
V W C 0 0'
N
N
t`
N
N
69
V3
k "j 69
'n rn
v
1
i
h N O
o0
00 o
W
�
p
M
M
?
L
69
V3
N N
N
V
�.
L N
d N
C
ii i
O
N
N
id
69
m
4i
fA
69
t':'..j
e9 Ni
Y3
aC
T O'
N N
N !D
v m
N M
�D
69
69
fig
�. 69 fA 69
�
9
E!i
�
O
O O
O
H
h
co
f.9
Hi
h9
:..1 69 vi V3
O O
O O
O
O
yL�•
4
f: O
�h
l
1:
i_.
fA
Vl
69
_,.i
fA 69
69
°' `'"
q
v o d `v a
o 'YJ H
a F
"
W Fl
7
4i
fA
69
t':'..j
e9 Ni
Y3
aC
T O'
N N
N !D
v m
N M
�D
�
9
E!i
69
Vi
fH 69
H
h
co
m U o
t
W C
yL�•
4
f: O
�h
fA
Vl
69
_,.i
fA 69
69
°' `'"
q
v o d `v a
o 'YJ H
a F
"
W Fl
PLi
y 'J —° m E H
a
q
aQi
a�¢�s�xwo
W caU
F i'n
cz6565>. S
.n
abb
.Z
W W
R
.. W
❑ G❑
p
A�
po
G QQ� 3
O
1
U—,
>
9
�
9
� 3
�
y
co
m U o
W C
yL�•
u a�i U ro v es 5
y m3
�—�
tO
•o'
G" Z` 2' c� c
❑3�
°' `'"
q
v o d `v a
o 'YJ H
a F
"
W Fl
PLi
y 'J —° m E H
a
q
aQi
a�¢�s�xwo
W caU
G
cz6565>. S
.n
abb
.Z
W W
R
.. W
❑ G❑
p
A�
po
G QQ� 3
O
1
1 000
1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents (45,476) (4,247) 63,672 (13,639) (5,902) (40,002) 1,603 11,457 22,110
\ Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 142,212 96,736 92,489 156,161 142,522 136,619 96,617 98,220 109,677
3 ^U\ Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $ 96,736 $ 92,489 $ 156,161 S 142,522 $ 136,619 $ 96,617 $ 98,220 $ 109,677 $ 131,787
Capital Projects - - - -- '_ -' - - - - -- -
Infrastructure ` -• _,.. _ .. �.. _ _ _ __ - _ __ __._ .�__.._ _-
StmatSewerlmprovements $ 30,000 S 35,000 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Equipment
Replacement - One -ton Plow truck 494 32,500
Total $ $ - $ - $ $ 30,000 $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Funded by Operations $ $ - $ - S - S 30,000 S 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Funded by Infrastructurelrrunk - _
Funded by debt _ _ -
Total $ $ - $ S $ 30,000 $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
I._
CITYOFANDOVER
Estimate F
Forcast
Enterprise Fund- Storm Sewer Operations 2
Storm Sewer System Financial Projections
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 2
2013 2
2014 2
2015 2
Actual
Estimate
9
Forcast
Year 2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
201d
2015
2016
Inflation Factor
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
3.0%
New Customers
(176,431) (
(181,724) (
(187,175) (
35
35
35
35
35
35
Residential - Urban /Rural (units)
9.434
9.525
9.533
9,568
9,603
9,638
9,673
9,708
9.743
Multiple Dwelling (acres)
188
190
223
223
223
223
223
223
223
Comm /Industrial (acres)
336
349
349
349
349
349
349
349
349
Schools/ Churches (acres)
248
282
282
282
282
282
282
282
282
Rates (Qtrly)
(10000) (
(10000) (
(10000) (
(10000)
Net from noncapimlfinancing activities (
(10,000) (
(10,000) -
- (
Residential - Urban /Rural - per unit
$ 6.33
$ 6.78 S
6.98 $
7.33 $
7.70 $
8.08 $
8.49 $
8.91 $
9.36
Multiple Dwelling - per acre
$ 13.92
$ 14.92 S
15.37 $
16.14 $
16.95 $
17.79 $
18.68 $
19.62 $
20.60
Comm / Industrial - per acre
$ 26.60
$ 28.51 S
29.37 $
31.15 $
3171 $
34.34 $
36.06 $
37.86 $
39.76
Schools / Churches - per acre
$ 12.64
$ 13.55 S
13.96 $
14.66 S
15.39 $
16.16 $
16.97 $
17.82 $
18.71
Residential - Urban /Rural - per unit
2.3%
T1%
2.9%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Multiple Dwelling - per acre
2.3%
7.2%
3.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.00/c
Comm / Industrial - per acre
2.3%
7.2%
3.0%
6.1%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Schools /Churches - per acre
2.3%
7.2%
3.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
1 000
1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents (45,476) (4,247) 63,672 (13,639) (5,902) (40,002) 1,603 11,457 22,110
\ Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 142,212 96,736 92,489 156,161 142,522 136,619 96,617 98,220 109,677
3 ^U\ Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $ 96,736 $ 92,489 $ 156,161 S 142,522 $ 136,619 $ 96,617 $ 98,220 $ 109,677 $ 131,787
Capital Projects - - - -- '_ -' - - - - -- -
Infrastructure ` -• _,.. _ .. �.. _ _ _ __ - _ __ __._ .�__.._ _-
StmatSewerlmprovements $ 30,000 S 35,000 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Equipment
Replacement - One -ton Plow truck 494 32,500
Total $ $ - $ - $ $ 30,000 $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Funded by Operations $ $ - $ - S - S 30,000 S 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Funded by Infrastructurelrrunk - _
Funded by debt _ _ -
Total $ $ - $ S $ 30,000 $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
I._
Actual E
Estimate F
Forcast
Enterprise Fund- Storm Sewer Operations 2
2008 2
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 2
2013 2
2014 2
2015 2
2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Receipts from customers and users $
$ 292,488 $ 3
318,883 $ 3
344,552 S
S 354,953 $ 3
373,778 $ 3
393,598 $ 4
414,466 $ 4
436,436 $ 4
459,568
Payment to suppliers (
(130,929) (
(90,647) (
(97,041) (
(166,303) (
(171,292) (
(176,431) (
(181,724) (
(187,175) (
(192,791)
Payment to employees (
(155,867) (
(207,548) (
(187,066) (
(203,289) (
(209,388) (
(215669) (
(222139) (
(228804) (
(235668)
Net from operating activities 5
5,692 2
20,688 6
60,445 (
(14,639) (
(6,902) 1
1,498 1
10,603 2
20,457 3
31,110
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
Payment of advances to other funds -
- _
_ -
-
Transfers out (
(10,000) (
(10,000) -
- -
- (
(10000) (
(10000) (
(10000) (
(10000)
Net from noncapimlfinancing activities (
(10,000) (
(10,000) -
- (
(10000) (
(10000) (
(10000) (
(10000)
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets (
(45,864) (
(17,093) -
- -
- -
- (
(32,500)
Proceeds from the sale of capital assets _
_
Net from capital and related financing activities (
(45,864) (
(17,093) -
- (
(32,500)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment income 4
4 696 2
2 158 3
3 227 1
1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents (45,476) (4,247) 63,672 (13,639) (5,902) (40,002) 1,603 11,457 22,110
\ Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 142,212 96,736 92,489 156,161 142,522 136,619 96,617 98,220 109,677
3 ^U\ Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $ 96,736 $ 92,489 $ 156,161 S 142,522 $ 136,619 $ 96,617 $ 98,220 $ 109,677 $ 131,787
Capital Projects - - - -- '_ -' - - - - -- -
Infrastructure ` -• _,.. _ .. �.. _ _ _ __ - _ __ __._ .�__.._ _-
StmatSewerlmprovements $ 30,000 S 35,000 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Equipment
Replacement - One -ton Plow truck 494 32,500
Total $ $ - $ - $ $ 30,000 $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Funded by Operations $ $ - $ - S - S 30,000 S 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Funded by Infrastructurelrrunk - _
Funded by debt _ _ -
Total $ $ - $ S $ 30,000 $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
I._
Capital Projects - - - -- '_ -' - - - - -- -
Infrastructure ` -• _,.. _ .. �.. _ _ _ __ - _ __ __._ .�__.._ _-
StmatSewerlmprovements $ 30,000 S 35,000 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Equipment
Replacement - One -ton Plow truck 494 32,500
Total $ $ - $ - $ $ 30,000 $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Funded by Operations $ $ - $ - S - S 30,000 S 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
Funded by Infrastructurelrrunk - _
Funded by debt _ _ -
Total $ $ - $ S $ 30,000 $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 45,000 $ 50,000
I._
I._
NDOVE:
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW. CLAN DOVER. MN. US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2012 Budget Development Discussion
DATE: July 26, 2011
INTRODUCTION
City Administration along with Department Heads is working on preparing a proposed 2012
Annual Operating Budget. Please refer to attached 2012 Budget Development Calendar for
various deadline dates. Administration is looking for City Council direction as the preparation of
the 2012 Annual Operating Budget proceeds.
City Administration will review with the Council the bold italics items at the meeting.
DISCUSSION
The following are the 2012 Budget Development guidelines that were adopted at the April 5t'
City Council meeting:
1) A commitment to a City Tax Capacity Rate to meet the needs of the organization and
positioning the City for long -term competitiveness through the use of sustainable revenue
sources and operational efficiencies.
Note: Recently updated Anoka County Assessor taxable market value figures for the City of
Andover are reflecting a 4.31% decrease in total taxable market value (please refer to
attached Pay 2012 Valuation Estimates). The City will not receive any Market Value
Homestead Credit in 2012 &2013. It should be noted that the State of Minnesota did not
place levy limits on cities for 2012.
2) Continue with the current procurement and financial plan to appropriately expend the bond
proceeds generated from the successful 2006 Open Space Referendum.
Note: The Open Space Advisory Commission and City Staff continue to evaluated properties
that could be the third open space purchase.
3) A fiscal goal that works toward establishing the General Fund balance for working capital at
no less than 40% of planned 2011 General Fund expenditures and the preservation of
emergency fund balances (snow emergency, public safety, facility management &
information technology) through targeting revenue enhancements or expenditure limitations
in the 2011 adopted General Fund budget.
Note: With property tax revenues making yp over 80% of the total General Fund revenues
(up from 74% iust two years ago) additional cash flows designations are appropriate
4) A commitment to limit the 2012 debt levy to no more than 20% of the gross tax levy and a
commitment to a detailed city debt analysis to take advantage of alternative financing
consistent with the City's adopted Debt Policy.
Note: The 2011 levy was 17.701o, the margin available to 20% would be sufficient to fund a
small equipment bond. At this point there does not appear to be additional restrictions
placed on cities by the recent legislative session.
5) A comprehensive review of the condition of capital equipment to ensure that the most cost -
effdctive replacement schedule is followed. Equipment will be replaced on the basis of a cost
benefit analysis rather than a year based replacement schedule.
Note: This is being done as part of the 2012 -2016 CIP development process.
6) A team approach that encourages strategic planning to meet immediate and long -term
operational, staffing, infrastructure and facility needs.
Note: City Administration is hopeful the Anoka County City /County/School District
Cooperation and Collaboration project will help achieve this guideline.
7) A management philosophy that actively supports the funding and implementation of Council
policies and goals, and a commitment to being responsive to changing community conditions,
concerns, and demands, and to do so in a cost effective manner.
Note: The City Council formally adopted 2011 -2012 Council Goals on June 7th These
goals pay special attention to fiscal values commercial & residential development or
redevelopment, collaboration opportunities service delivery and livability /image goals.
Fund Balance Forecast, Proposed 2012 Tax Levy, and Proposed 2012 General Fund Budget
Updates:
Administration will review with the Council the attached 2011 General Fund Balance
Analysis, Proposed Property Tax Levy and Proposed 2012 General Fund Budget at the
Meeting.
-a -
Staffing:
No new staffing requests were made by Departments for the 2012 budget. Administration's first
request, if funding were available (approximately $75K), would be to exercise the recall of the
Public Works employee that was laid off as part of the 2010 budget process. No furloughs or
hour reductions are anticipated at this time.
With various position vacancies, Administration has and continues to closely monitor staffing
availability and budget to maintain adequate service levels to the public. Listed below are
positions that have been reviewed over the past seven years along with current disposition:
Community Development Director
Building Permit Technician
-After being vacant for a few months after a
retirement, this position was filled in June 2012
(Dave Carlberg).
-Vacant due to a recent retirement. Duties of this
position are currently assigned to other city staff;
position replacement is dependent on new housing
starts.
Maintenance Worker - Position is vacant and currently unfunded. Was
part of the 2009 layoff program to address revenue
shortfall.
General Clerk - Position is vacant and currently unfunded. Was part
of the 2009 layoff program to address revenue
shortfall.
Building Inspector - Position is vacant and currently unfunded. Was part
of the 2009 layoff program to address revenue
shortfall
City Clerk - Position is vacant and currently unfunded. Title of
City Clerk assigned to City Administrator, duties
assigned to other city staff with a title change
(Deputy City Clerk).
Associate Planner - Position is vacant and currently unfunded. Position
was not replaced in 2009 due to a resignation.
Engineering Interns - Positions vacant and unfunded. No interns have
been hired since 2009.
Summer /Seasonal Staffing - Number of summer staffing reduced significantly
from 11 to 5 in 2009. We are now at 7.
1 3 -
Public Work Superintendent
Administrative Assistant - Admin
Accounting Clerk - Finance
Position was eliminated after a retirement. Duties
were primarily assigned to the City Engineer /Public
Works Director. Engineering and Public Works
were consolidated under one department head.
- Position reduced to half -time position after a
retirement.
- Position vacant & unfunded after a retirement.
Duties assigned to other Finance Department Staff.
Finance Director - Position vacant and unfunded. Position duties
performed by City Administrator and Finance
Manager (i.e. Assistant Finance Director).
Personnel Related Implications:
To date the following are projected issues facing personnel related expenses:
1. In Administration's opinion the current salary compensation package is competitive with
other government entities. Administration and Human Resources continually review
position -based salaries in detail to confirm competitiveness. As Part of the budget
Process, Pay steps for eligible employees will be included in the 2012 budget Proposal
but no cost of living adjustment (COLA) is recommended.
Council feedback/direction is sought on this topic.
2. A midyear review of the health plan will be conducted with our broker on July 26th, an
update will be provided at the workshop. Insurance claims trends at this time do not
appear to be favorable. The current proposed 2012 budget for health insurance is carrying
a 10% increase, with future hones of a lesser or no increase
The City currently offers the employees a high deductible plan ($5,000 family, $2,500
single) with a health spending account (HSA), this was implemented in 2006. As part of
the program, the City pays for 100% of a single health insurance premium, 76% for a
family health insurance premium and contributes annually to the employees HSA.
3. At the most recent legislative session, legislature approved increased employee and
employer contributions to the Public Employee Retirement Association (PERA) as part of
the most recent public pension legislation, the necessary modifications are implemented
into the budget and the current increase is reflected in the PERA special levy.
-4-
Contractual Departments:
1. The City Attorney 2011 contract included a 1% increase over the 2010 rate.
Discussion for the 2012 contract will likely indicate if City employees are not granted a
COLA, the legal service contract would be treated the same
2. The 2011 City of Andover Law Enforcement expenditure budget is $2,615,407 which is
offset by a Police State Aid revenue budget of $112,860 and School Liaison revenue
budget of $83,988 reflecting a net tax levy impact of $2,418,559.
The current Sheriff's contract provides for:
a. 80 hours per day of patrol service
b. 12 hours per day of service provided by a Community Service Officer
c. School Liaison Officers in the middle school and high school
d. Patrol Investigator
e. 50% of the Crime Watch Program's coordinator position.
It should be noted that the Sheriff's Department always provides the required number of
deputies for all hours contracted by the City. If the Sheriff's Department has a vacancy
or a deputy is injured etc.., they still provide the City with a deputy at straight time even
though they may have to fill those hours with overtime which at times may cost the
Sheriff s Department additional, but is not billable per the contract.
Staff has had initial discussions with the Anoka County Sheriff on the 2012 contract
discussing the status auo for most services, but has received Pricing for increasing the
City's commitment to the Crime Watch Program.
The Sheriff will be making a 2012 Proposes law enforcement contract Presentation as
a separate agenda item at the workshop
Council Memberships and Donations /Contributions:
The following memberships /contributions are included in the proposed 2012 General Fund
Budget:
• North Metro Mayors Association
$13,709
• Association of Metropolitan Cities (AMM)
$ 9,047
• Community Schools
$ -
■ Mediation Services
$ 3,323
• YMCA — Water Safety Program
$ 7,500
• Youth First (Program Funding)
$12,000
• Teen Center Funding (YMCA/Youth First)
$21,000
• Central Center for Family Resources
$ 1,500
- Terminated 6 -30 -2011
The following donations /contributions are in the proposed 2012 Charitable Gambling Fund
Budget:
• Northwest Anoka County Community Consortium $10,000 JPA with other cities
• Alexandra House $10,000 Below request
• Senior High Parties $ 1,200
Please note that any funding coming from the Charitable Gambling Fund is contingent on
available resources. Council direct is sought on the proposed 2012 Budget requests.
Capital Projects and Debt Service Funds
Capital Projects Levy:
Capital Projects Levy — The 2011 Capital Projects Levy Budget specifically designates
$1,391,385 of the general tax levy to capital projects and equipment needs relating to Capital
Outlay ($210,000), Road and Bridge ($1,064,959), Pedestrian Trail Maintenance ($54,926) and
Park Projects ($61,500). Specific designation of the tax levy to anticipated City needs and
priorities for transportation and trail maintenance, park projects and equipment outlays allows the
City to strategically allocate its resources and raise the public's awareness of City spending
priorities. The Road and Bridge levy is calculated according to Council Policy based on annual
growth increases, with Capital Outlay, Pedestrian Trail Maintenance and Park Levies increased
according to the City Council budget guidelines.
• Road and Bridge — This levy is proposed for transportation programming related to
maintaining City streets, roadways and pedestrian trails. This would be the sixth year that
a portion of the Road & Bridge Fund is dedicated to pedestrian trail maintenance. This
levy is also used for the City's seal coating and crack sealing programs and for street
overlays. The 2012 proposed levy to Roads is $1,022,817, a 3.96% decrease The 2012
proposed levopedestrian trail maintenance is $56,574, a 3.0% increase
• Park Improvements — This levy is proposed as an annual appropriation to be used to
underwrite a wide range of park improvement projects as recommended by the Park and
Recreation Commission and approved by the City Council. This funding is intended to be
a long -term supplemental source of capital funding for park projects that would be
separately identified in the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. The 2012
proposed levy is $61.500, same as 2011.
• Capital Equipment/Projects — Under the Capital Projects Levy a levy is proposed to be
designated to capital improvement/equipment project expenditures identified through the
CIP process. Through this designation, the City, over time, will build a fund reserve to
avoid cash flow "spikes" and address a wide range of capital improvement needs such as
6 -
facility maintenance projects under a more controlled spending environment. The 2012
proposed lees is $210,000 same as 2011
Direction is sought from the Council as to whether or not the Proposed Capital Levies meet
the Councils desires.
Debt Service Levy:
Annually the Finance Department conducts a detailed debt service analysis to monitor
outstanding debt and to look for early debt retirement or refinancing opportunities that will yield
interest expense savings to the City. Staff and Ehlers & Associates have completed that review
and it appears at this time, there are not any refinancing opportunities and the Debt Service Fund
Budgets below is what is expected for 2012.
The preliminary 2012 Debt Service levy provides for the following debt service levies:
• 2004A G.O. Capital Imp. Bonds $ 405,292
• 2004 EDA Public Facility Revenue $ 1,092,684
• 2011 G.O. Equipment Bonds $ 102,107
• 2012 G.O. Equipment Certificate (new) $ 125,000
• 2010 G.O. Open Space Bonds $ 182,558
Total $199079551
The levy for the 2004 EDA Public Facility Bonds is presented at a levy that was identified in the
original pro -forma analysis for the community center. It should be noted that this levy is
scheduled to be reduced significantly starting in 2014, the levy will basically be offset by a
significant portion of the $635,000 YMCA annual rental payment.
The total 2012 Debt Service Levy Proposed is $21562 less than (112%) the 2011 levy,
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation and provide direction to staff.
V
a
.�i
W y
Oq
� y
U �
m
N
ti
O
N
U
R
A
O
U
U U U
ui
ui
A
4)
.� C7
v ti a
opn Ej
v o
N
O � N
a
y � A
0
w .9 b
b
O p
a N �
O W O
O N
N 3
O > O
� w �
U U U
C,
N
NO
J7 �
w �
i 0
y0 0°
Y Y
3
U U rig
� � U
w w U
vi
a
,o
N
N �
.O
U ,n
Y �
o ,n
A �
N �y
O 20,
N W
'•. O O O
N N N N N N O O
N N
U N 7J
-9-
Y
P
N
O
H
N
..
Cc
CD
•)
O
x
c
x
�.
'.
4)
Y
�
y
ca
U
N
A
ti
N
N
A
m
V]
°c
U
U
w
V]
C
U
U
N
A
�
P
w
w
+cg
M
Al
U
m
U
CaJ
A
Co
A
Y
❑�
iw
C
u
iw
�
0
U
x
y
iw
'•. O O O
N N N N N N O O
N N
U N 7J
-9-
Y
N
O
H
N
..
CD
•)
O
N
�.
'.
N
00
*
N
�
43
�•-"
N
N
N
i
N
I
�--i
M
00
00
ti
ti
ti
b
ti
ti
ti
O
Oa
�
O
n�i
W
s
N
U
V1
O
�
�
00
y
O
•U
AO
b
O
°
A
N
°
ny
Y
o
Q
•Y
o
o
U
b
°
0
y
Y
ti
cU
N
o
o
w
>
o
o°q
40i
W
q
o
0.
O a
N
y
C3.
y
N
.N
O
.0
W
.ty
O
b
U
Li.
0
y
N
ti
�.
.0
O
A.
,D iC
C
R.
'O
Q)
'.�
'b
%'
U
40.
b
0
°
O
0
ca
p
a
n
P
v
R
o
Y
W
y
o
U
� °
.�
�
•v
�
�
'c3
a"'i
A c
as
•a.
�
W
.�
b
en
o
a
a
c
w
a
Cq
U
A.0
9j
U
U
A
b
N
0..
U
9 i
N
V1
U
Ci
A
P.
'•. O O O
N N N N N N O O
N N
U N 7J
-9-
O
N
O
N
N
..
CD
•)
O
N
�.
'.
N
00
*
N
�
43
�•-"
N
N
N
i
N
I
'•. O O O
N N N N N N O O
N N
U N 7J
-9-
ti
t7
O
Y
k
O
O
b
dF
+t
a
H
O
N
'.
00
*
N
�
43
�•-"
N
N
N
i
N
I
�--i
M
00
00
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
t7
O
Y
k
O
O
b
dF
+t
a
w
U
U
V
s.
a
W �
q
a
W y
OA
U p
m
N
r-1
0
N
b N
7
o �=
U ti
U U V U Q U U U U U
U U U " U U U U u U
U V U A U [r U [z U U U U U U
N
O
N
O
w y
ti Y
U
U � O
o � U
� U O
R= �
O
A 'b
s7 �
> �?
N �
Q
v ca
N cc
� ° o
U a
d
r/ v
N N
N N
O
N
r
N
d
d
pq
FG U
O
q w
A
3 0
y v7
O
w
I
Cq
y
N b
b �
o as
� U
o U
Al A
U U
fy.
ti
O
N .�
O N
M
N N
U
a °
U
vn O
,Iq
.b
0.01
V �
Y
w C N
O W
nx 000n
o
to
a a
O � U
C7 ^ 0
Q
c U u o
U U U U
o�
v
a
O
N
O
p Q 0
O O
Z Z A A
U U U U U
w w w w w
"Cl
5
th
v
.5
a
0
U
O
.b
b
.00
O n
bq cOd
7J y
. c
O
N U
b
U
ti
w 0, N
❑U N „d
�i
v
C) (0
O O
N N
O 00
N N
a
fa
O
wo
.o
.O
Y
0
w
O
O
U
W
i!
N N N
ON N N
N {NTH' N
ca
v,
0
0
.y
k
N
q
dE
N �
O
N
� a
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
rY/i
W
YVi
"bn
2
o'n
n
d
C
d
r/ v
N N
N N
O
N
r
N
d
d
pq
FG U
O
q w
A
3 0
y v7
O
w
I
Cq
y
N b
b �
o as
� U
o U
Al A
U U
fy.
ti
O
N .�
O N
M
N N
U
a °
U
vn O
,Iq
.b
0.01
V �
Y
w C N
O W
nx 000n
o
to
a a
O � U
C7 ^ 0
Q
c U u o
U U U U
o�
v
a
O
N
O
p Q 0
O O
Z Z A A
U U U U U
w w w w w
"Cl
5
th
v
.5
a
0
U
O
.b
b
.00
O n
bq cOd
7J y
. c
O
N U
b
U
ti
w 0, N
❑U N „d
�i
v
C) (0
O O
N N
O 00
N N
a
fa
O
wo
.o
.O
Y
0
w
O
O
U
W
i!
N N N
ON N N
N {NTH' N
ca
v,
0
0
.y
k
N
q
dE
N �
O
N
� a
N
d
R
E
O W
❑ c
O
Q C
O>
U N
W
d
-- vo -
0
N
W
7
N
O
r
N
N
tq
N
w
r
O
M
T
•V
O
O
O
W
c6
Q.
K 2
N
IL
M
N
0
F g iV
O
`N-'
`�
N
N
0 >
U
N
y N
CL
O
d
N
tz T
W d
p
�
o 0 0
o
W
V
r
i
(q (Nl1
N
U
C
N
. a
d
Q
C
X N 0
M
8
�T
�
a-
N
>
�
U
O)
a
O
N
O
IO
N
M
O
U
c
O W O h
In
LO
N N
h
W
(O X
0
N
O
O O
M
t0
h
O
M (O
N (O M n
O
O
O O
O O
O O
m
0
Oh
p ~
7 N � dN'
Q N
O
N
O
V r O
FR
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Esr
O
O
O
ns
O
» (n (» (»
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O (O
(py
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OOH N
0
2
0 0
M
M
N
N
N
N N N N
. - N R
Y 3
a a D- a
b >
F
N
6?
W
(D
N
O
r
o
p
M
N
N
O
d
�-
(O
LLi
W
~ C>
r
W
N
d
W
o
ca
vi
O
N
A
O
m
o
IL
w
X (6 N
O
N
Y}
O
co
(O
h
M
o 0 0
M
M
c0
W
M
(O
y
M
N
ch
h
p�
W M
X U�
(O
co
O
N
N
r-
h
G
W W d'
F Q A
dam_
M
o
0
0n
7
M >
? U
M
N
o
o
`
N
(6
(L
O
O M O h
m
W (3 M
(O
2 3
p
�
M to O
%
F Cc >
pMj
W fli It M
nj
N N N N
(p
t9 HT Y3 Hf
07 O r N
C
O
O o 0 0
O
C
N N N N
N
O -
T T T T
10]
a. d a d
0 0
C
N
U
O
o
U
j
T
N
T
O
N
N
@
d
>
a
N_
X
N
N
O
N
N
❑
�
U
O
O
w
O
U
N
U
U
U
'u.
Q
F0-
-- vo -
N
N
O
O
N
N
T
N
c6
Q.
IL
0
O
N
N
N
CL
d
d
_3
�
V
O
i
O
r
N
U
C
N
. a
d
Q
C
8
�T
�
a-
O)
O
N
T
CL
0
N
O
O O
O
O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
IL
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O (O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
M
N
N
N
O
N
N
IL
O
N
m
CL
d
�
O
i
N
C
. a
d
8
O)
O
N
T
CL
O
O O
O
O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(U
O
(O
O
O (O
M
M
N
N 1
�
r
City of Andover 7/2112011
General Fund
2011 Fund Balance Analysis
2011
Estimated
Budget
December 31, 2010 $ 5,110,905
2011 Estimated Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) 120,332
Projected December 31, 2011 5,231,237
Less: Snow Emergency
(80,000)
Public Safety
(80,000)
Facility Management
(80,000)
Information Technology
(80,000)
MVHC
(490,186)
Prepaids / Inventories
(206,666)
Working Cash Flow
(4,174,931)
Estimated Balance Available for Adjustments
$ 39,454
2011 Working Cash Flow Designation Calculation:
2012 Requested Expenditure
% of 2012 General Fund Expenditures
GF - Fund Balance
-t 1
$ 9,277,625
45.00%
$ 4,174,931
m
O
m
C_
J
� X
v IR
Q T
a �
Q o
o a`
T
U
m
m rn
V
i0 n f0 O
N
c n m
o
>
°
m
cmi
CD
a m
w
w
w w w w
w w
e
o O
m
c
L N
U m
O
w
w
e
N �
F rn
m
b �
m
N eN Ynj
w
N
a °
m
� N �
U n
w
e
a <
° m
� N m
U n
m
D N
rn O
O
H W
U m
w
M
W N
� H N
U m
w
r
D
no 0
L ry O
U �O
w
m
w
0
r
m rn
U
c n m
o
>
°
m
6 c p l
CD
a m
Q
w w
w
w w w w w
w
e
o O
m
c
L N
U m
O
w
w
e
N �
F rn
m
b �
m
N eN Ynj
w
N
a °
m
� N �
U n
w
e
a <
° m
� N m
U n
m
D N
rn O
O
H W
U m
w
M
W N
� H N
U m
w
r
D
no 0
L ry O
U �O
w
m
w
0
r
N
D
C
m
m m
C J C 0 N N N C N 0
CJ C p N N N N p N d C
y
d 2 2
K m m v v K m m
> aci m m m n m m c
a o = w O
O O O O O O W m v o. d° c = <>+ m
j U U U U 6 U U 0 U' U (7 U d w N W o m m ¢ J U K
LL Z Q W 0 W Ol Q Q Q G Q
w
N N A J
0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 W ry O 0 d0 V y LL N
F
U ❑ O U � V' J J
6 O O I's m O 0' O V
1s
CD
CD Lq
N
D
C
m
m m
C J C 0 N N N C N 0
CJ C p N N N N p N d C
y
d 2 2
K m m v v K m m
> aci m m m n m m c
a o = w O
O O O O O O W m v o. d° c = <>+ m
j U U U U 6 U U 0 U' U (7 U d w N W o m m ¢ J U K
LL Z Q W 0 W Ol Q Q Q G Q
w
N N A J
0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 W ry O 0 d0 V y LL N
F
U ❑ O U � V' J J
6 O O I's m O 0' O V
I I
cs
- �.1 --
I
v
s �
O T
c J
o v
p m
d K m
n x U
T ~ F
O N d
y J �
a v a
J Z Q
e
m m
C N
N
U c
e a e e
m O O O
O O O O
O
o e o a
N RJ n �O
0
e o e e
O m r ry
m n m o
0
e a o e
O
�vNj CN] CNJ O
O
e e o e
O
O
e a e
rn m N
.- °o m
N N M
� O
K K
3 � ii
a
O
y N N Q
U U U
O
N
n
CD Lq
CD
a �
�
- �.1 --
I
v
s �
O T
c J
o v
p m
d K m
n x U
T ~ F
O N d
y J �
a v a
J Z Q
e
m m
C N
N
U c
e a e e
m O O O
O O O O
O
o e o a
N RJ n �O
0
e o e e
O m r ry
m n m o
0
e a o e
O
�vNj CN] CNJ O
O
e e o e
O
O
e a e
rn m N
.- °o m
N N M
� O
K K
3 � ii
a
O
y N N Q
U U U
O
N
n
�3
a0000eeoeooe
000eoe
oe0000000
o
-e
h O N M O g h b O W N
N
N
N
b
N
W
Y!
V1 Vl q V O M
Vl M N O O O q� _b•.
O
C.
i
,.,�
g
b g O V O cl
P h R M N g V Vl O M m t' V
cl
W b h q'M
b W O V O h Yl ti
Vl
Vl
lO
y
W O Vl Vl W T m� N V O .--i q q
V N vl b q q
m oo f� l0 b l0 Vl b O
c0
W
tom.
N
Q O M ti
h V g M M O C N N
b:
b
N
V
a
t) o i0 O m h b O l� W O V b
(+l
O M W b lD
l (3 V O' -ey
Vl O O O M r W
O M l � O V' O M N Vl
O
O
.O
O
N
O
y N
N
J+
a
b O O m O h O M W g O
h
I
l7 O N O m Vl b O
°i Yl N 11 r+l r� Vl W N V t � q
M M b G rl
V O l� @ q l'
Vl O O O M h W
O
O
N
OFyN
H N b b M b m vl l�
d' O Vl vl r
q V m M N m H
V1
1n
1A
I y
C Cl r
f � ^ 0 0� I� g M r q vl O M W
N l � l � @ q O
C
� q N W W t'1 q 0
0)
T
q
O
V po
.
CO M Vl M O .r q b M@ N Vl MI�
M O N O N M O M M N b
M h T b g b N^ b b N g M
N O N 'A Vl b
V Vr O M 1% O
i0 [rl T @
N q .m-. O b .-� M rrr
O C -q, N O i0 b O Vl H
O
Vl
C•
VI
(�1..
@
'J'
R q
v1 0o N V N rO b O O N K1 W T
h oo v1 � - N
n g b N O oo v1 N
q�
q
GO
d
a
O
b b b O O O r° q W M b O
O l e b O lr1 N� ll O N V r0 M
C m N O g O
N b� h [n O OJ
q W Vl C V-- lc m q
W Vl M O O rp b M
q
C
q
T
T
@
N
N
N
d3
!y
� m g
W N M h V f� r0 r N M M rD b
W l0 (1 Vr .-i M O r0 Vl q Nl rD L'
b-i C
W q l� @ N
n r' _ Vl rD h N
V Vl N M V g b q
q
ti
q
W
O
d3
y�
a
g
3
H:
U W 6 a
p r
r' � L a°
Ci
¢ z x 6 w 19
W F
a H
o
F!
�3