Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 11, 1978 o o o 0 ~ 01 ANDOVER o o Approval of Minutes 1. Comm. #5-78-2 2. Comm. ff4-78-6 3. Comm. 1f6-78-3 4. Comm. #2-78-5 5. Comm. 1f6-78-9 6. Comm. fF7 -7 8-1 7. Comm. 1f5-78-6 8. Comm. ff7-78-2 9. Comm. 1f5-78-8 10. Comm. #6-77-6 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING July 11, 1978 7:30 P.M. AGENDA Galen Ferrian Special Use Permit Continued Johnson's Field Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing John Sonterre Variance Continued Pond View Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing James Conroy Rezoning (Pond View) Continued Public Hearing Vacation of Easement (Rosella Sonsteby) Public Hearing Pine Hills Addition Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Donald Janssen Variance Ordinance #37 Amendment (Amending Mandatory Septic System Pumping Section) Discussion of Ordinances 8 and 10 Revision For publication on July 7, 1978 o o o o o o 0 ~ 01 ANDOVER o REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING July 11, 1978 MINUTES The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Larry Retzlaff on July 11, 1978 at the Andover Community Center, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anoka, Minnesota. Commissioners Present: d'Arcy Bosell, Walter Dick, Ralph Kishel, and Jeannine Pyron Also Present: Dewey Kasma, Engineer from T.K.D.A., and others Minutes Motion by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner Kishel, to approve the Minutes of June 27, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Galen Ferrian Special Use Permit Continued (Comm. #5-78-2) The City Council has returned the Special Use Permit to the Commission for review of the proposed use of the property. The Commission received a sketch plan from Mr. Ferrian. The sketch shows that the fence is 107' from the lot line, the building is 8 x 16 and the house is 60' from the fence. The Commission agreed that Mr. Ferrian's drawing was inadequate. Chairman Retzlaff asked the Ferrian's to redraw their sketch and come back in an hour or so. John Sonterre Variance Continued (Comm. #6-78-3) The variance request has been withdrawn and the City Council has already refunded the variance fee to Mr. Sonterre. Vacation of Easement (Rosella Sonsteby) Public Hearing (Comm. #7-78-1) Chairman Retzlaff called the public hearing to order for Rosella Sonsteby's request for vacation of an easement in Section 29. Chairman Retzlaff referred to the City action in 1977 denying her similar request to vacate this easement. Commissioner Bosell referred to the letter from 5-9-77 from Gabriel Giancola (the Hagen's attorney) that states, in part, that the prescriptive easement was granted in court and "Although this is the case, whether or not said easement is vacated, my client would retain their prescriptive rights as outlined in the aforementioned judgment". She asked if that statement says that if the City vacates the easement, the Hagen's still have the right of ingress and egress over that property. ;" U eJ o CJ o o o Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 11, 1978 Page 2 (Commissioner Bosell continued) One of the reasons for denial before was that this easement would be a natural extension of l43rd in the future. The sketch plan, submitted by Mrs. Sonsteby recently, does not include this as an extension. That easement goes on the back lot line of some of the lots in her sketch. If we vacate the easement, in her opinion, the Hagen's would still retain their right of ingress and egress because they have been granted that. Attorney Giancola stated that the letter was "his opinion" and didn't think the Commission could rely on that. Chairman Retzlaff felt that the Hagen's would not have a right to ingress and egress if the easement was vacated. Chairman Retzlaff asked Mrs. Sonsteby to present her request and, if possible, tell the Commission what circumstances are different today than from on May 1, 1977. Rosella Sonsteby, 'The circumstances probably aren't that much different. I am developing the property there and I feel that this road easement is between the Town of Grow and me and nobody else. As far as anybody else connected with it, that is a different story. This road easement is only between the Town of Grow and me. There is nobody else that should be connected with it. Another thing, if you people want to keep the road easement on, then my counsel has advised me that then you should maintain it. Because I have a right to get to my back 40 and that was the purpose of the road easement. I can't get in there without having that road maintained." It was pointed out that there are a lot of road easements that aren't maintained. The City would maintain the road if it is upgraded to City standards. The property owners would be charged for improving it. It would have to be a dedicated right-of-way before the City would maintain it. The City is not going to upgrade a road because it is dedicated though. There are many miles of roads in Andover that are dedicated but not developed. Gabriel Giancola, 7362 University Avenue NE, Fridley, "I am representing Mr. and Mrs. Hagen. This has been a perennial problem and I would like to make peac~ if we could, with Mrs. Sonsteby. The matter, whether we get into the easement again or the use of the easement, is scheduled in District Court again in August. There is a motion before the court for dismissal. There has been a lot of money, time and expense expended on the problem. We built a new garage a few years back and do use the easement. The access is through the easement and then out on County Road 9. The County won't make any more cuts for access. The only access the Hagen's have off their property is through the easement. Also, Mrs. Francis has property fronting the easement and some time she might develop her property. We are asking that the action by the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended last year be again affirmed." o o () o () Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 11, 1978 Page 3 Mrs. Sonsteby, "I will insist that this is a case between the Town of Grow and me on the easement. It has nothing to do with the Hagen's or anyone else and I want you to act accordingly on that only. I have advice from my counsel and if you want to act for other reasons, then you are not serving what I have petitioned for." Letter, dated 7-11-78, from Bonnie Francis, 14260 Round Lake Boulevard, "I would like to see the 33' easement at approximately l42nd Lane continued as it gives us access to our back lots. It also gives the fire department access to the back area across the creek in case of grass fire - which in dry years is always a potential danger to us." Mrs. Sonsteby, "According to my plat, there will be a road there and Mrs. Francis already has access to her back property from Underclift." Chairman Retzlaff called for more public input - no one responded. Motion by Commissioner Kishel, seconded by Commissioner Dick, to close ~~ the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 0' Motion by Commissioner Bosell to continue this matter until such time as Mrs. Sonsteby has submitted a preliminary plat for the area adjacent to the easement request and then deal with these 2 items at one time. Motion dies for lack of second. Cormnissioner Bosell, "The purpose for my making the motion was to tie the actions together. Therefore it would not be a logical extension of l43rd if her preliminary plat did come before the Commission and that way it would generate some activity on her part either to continue the platting or dismiss it all together." Discussed the width of the easements. Mrs. Sonsteby was asked what she would do with this parcel 540' long and 43' wide. She said that she owns the lot next to it and she would add it onto that lot - it would be buildable when sewer and water comes in. She had offered it to the Hagen's for $5,000. Mr. Giancola pointed out that the Hagen's have lived there since 1961. Motion by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Chairman Retzlaff, to continue this matter until such time as Mrs. Sonsteby has submitted a preliminary plat for the area adjacent to the easement request and then deal with these 2 items at one time. 1-' \.J Discussion: in August there will be a court determination; if this is continued for 60 days, the court could decide whether to give the Hagen's their prescriptive rights whether the vacation was allowed or not; if it is tied in with a plat, nothing is accomplished because a person can file a plat and have the easement released and then these people are in a questionable position; allowing the motion to stand o o u o ~ Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 11, 1978 Page 4 and request an op~n~on from the Andover City Attorney about whether the Hagen's still have prescriptive rights of ingress and egress. Mrs. Sonsteby, '~y petition that is before you is between the Town of Grow and me. The other easement is between the Hagen's and me." It was pointed out that the Hagen's are a part of the Town of Grow/City of Andover. The City of Andover issued a building permit to the Hagen's for a garage facing Mrs. Sonsteby's 10.89' easement and the easement under consideration. Mrs. Sonsteby was asked if she purchased the property with the existing easement on it. She replied, '~es, I did. When I bought it they came in facing Round Lake Boulevard. After I bought it they started using the easement." o Mrs. Hagen, I~e bought that house in 1961. Mr. Steffenson owned the property that the easement comes from and he told us "don't ever drive on the South side of your house, use only that easement to get to your backyard like everybody before you has done". He said continue to use it and we, Hooselines and us, used the easements. We had just a narrow little strip between our driveways that used to pile up sand and we both got stuck so in 1963 we changed our driveway and then tore the garage down that was there when we moved here and started coming in from the easement. We paid for the upkeep with Hooselines." Chairman Retzlaff left the meeting to confer with Attorney William G. Hawkins (who was at a City Council Meeting). The Commission discussed where the la easement is located. Mrs. Sonsteby said that the 33' easement is only 23' because there is a big tree growing there. Chairman Retzlaff reported that Mr. Hawkins said, "If the Hagen's have a prescriptive easement right on the easement, the City could vacate it". In Chairman Retzlaff's opinion they have a prescriptive easement right only across the 10.89' of land to the easement and don't have an easement right declared on the public easement. Mr. Hawkins said that under the State Statutes for vacation of easements, easements can only be vacated for public benefit not for private benefit and that must be taken into consideration in this action. Discussed: the previous motion on the floor - the easement, if vacated, would leave the Hagens without any access; what public interest would it be serving by vacating the easement; the City is not maintaining the easement; the City has no cost in leaving the easement there; the only thing that has changed since the action by the City a year ago is Mrs. Sonsteby's sketch plan presentations. () The motion and second were withdrawn. o o u o :-j ~ Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 11, 1978 Page 5 Commissioner Bosell, "If Mrs. Sonsteby goes ahead with her sketch plan into a preliminary plat and into a final plat, the lots that are created by that plat include the easement. Does that create any problems? The persons that purchase that land would not be able to develop that part of their property. Is that right?" Chairman Retzlaff, "Mrs. Sonsteby could request a vacation of that section of the easement that is on that property." Motion by Commissioner Pyron, seconded by Commissioner Dick, that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council denial of the vacation (legal description of the easement - The S. 33' of the N. 263.48' of the SE~ of the SW~ of Section 29, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota) for the following reasons: 1) there is an existing easement of record, this was prior to her purchasing the property, so she bought it with knowledge of it being there; 2) that the Andover building department granted a building permit on July 5, 1976 for the garage which faces the easement; 3) that the vacation of the easement would not allow ingress and egress for the Hagen family; 4) that vacation of the easement is not going to benefit the public's c=) interest; and 5) a public hearing was held and there were two opposed. Vote on motion: yes - Chairman Retzlaff, Commissioner Dick, Commissioner Pyron; present - Commissioner Bosell, Commissioner Kishel. Motion carried. This will be on the City Council Agenda on August 1, 1978. Pine Hills Addition Preliminary Plat Public Hearing (Comm. #5-78-6) Chairman Retzlaff called the public hearing to order. Present for the plat - Lawrence Reynolds, owner; Stanley Knoll, developer; and Tom O'Malley, surveyor. Engineer Kasma reviewed the letter from T.K.D.A. dated 7-7-78. 2 of the major problems noted were: 1) l6lst Avenue is designated as a Municipal State Aid Highway; and 2) the frontages on some of the lots don't meet the minimum Ordinance requirements. Discussed requiring a frontage road for the one lot on County Road 9 - Ordinance 10 - Section 9.03. The future subdivision plan is not shown on the plat - Ordinance 10, Section 9.06. Not all of the contiguous land is being developed, however, the subdivider has a Contract for Deed for this land and is a part owner of a corporation owning the remainder of the property. Discussed Municipal State Aid Highways. C) Karen Schelberg, 16135 Vintage Street, asked about l6lst being designated M.S.A.H. and when and how it might be upgraded since the road is almost impassable a lot of the time. She was told that the City can't make the developer improve l6lst but by this plat going in, it might prompt the City Council to improve l6lst. The Road Improvement Committee might look at this as a higher-traffic area which deserves upgrading sooner or maybe MSAH funds could be used. f) \.J (-) '-J (J o o o CJ Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 11, 1978 Page 6 The Park and Recreation Commission has recommended that lots 1 and 2, block 2 be dedicated for park and the balance of the dedication be made in cash. Mr. O'Malley said that if they have to move the road and shift some of the lots perhaps they will locate the parkland elsewhere in the plat. Discussed the problems with meeting the lot frontage and roadway minimum requirements. Motion by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner Kishel, to continue the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Galen Ferrian Special Use Permit Continued (Comm. #5-78-2) Mr. Ferrian submitted a revised site plan of his property. This Commission has already made a motion to the City Council on this Special Use Permit. Motion by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner Kishel, that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the Galen Ferrian Special Use Permit (on the following described property: Lot 1, Watt's Garden Acres in Grow Township, except the West 1031' thereof, and except the South 122.5' thereof, according to the plat thereof on file in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Anoka County, Minnesota; and the East 107' of the West 1031', lying North of the South 82.5' of Lot 1, Watt's Garden Acres in Grow Township, according to the plat thereof on file in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Anoka County, Minnesota.) for the operation of a used auto reduction yard under Ordinance 8, Section 7.03, Special Uses, for the following reasons: 1) the use would be consistent with the surrounding area; 2) there was a public hearing held and supportive comments were noted; 3) the criteria for Special Use Permit is being met, i.e. fencing; 4) it would not adversely affect the surrounding area; and 5) a site plan dated 7-11-78 was submitted as requested by the City Council and meets with the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission. It is further recommended that the following contingencies be completed: 1) that the license be applied for under Ordinance 9; and 2) that a building be constructed as required under Ordinance 8, Section 3.02 (0000) definition of "Used Auto Parts". Vote on motion: yes - Chairman Retzlaff, Commissioner Dick, Commissioner Kishel, Commissioner Bosell; no - Commissioner Pyron. Motion carried. This will be on the City Council agenda on August 1, 1978. 1'-'\ '''-./ \ "\ o :.J o () .... o o Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 11, 1978 Page 7 Johnson's Field Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #4-78-6) Linda Johnson, owner, and James Kurth, surveyor, were present. Engineer Kasma reviewed the letter dated 7-11-78 from T.K,D.A. with the Commission. Copy of the letter is attached. The proposed plat is in the Round Lake Watershed area. 8 acres stays within the plat in ponding areas but the remainder of the acreage drains into the Watershed wetland area. The ponding area in the Northwest corner of the plat will have to be increased. Discussed the Park and Recreation Commission's meeting of July 6 when a number of residents from Dehn's Addition asked that park land be given in this plat. They will have a Special Meeting on July 13th to look at the land that might be involved. Linda Johnson said that the people in Dehn's don't necessarily want her land but they want a park for the kids to play in. She prefers to give cash in lieu of land. The Planning and Zoning Commission members were concerned with Lots 6 and 7 of Block 3 in relation to park land or fill required to make them buildable. Discussed Ordinance 10 Section 9.04 regarding utility easements. . Motion by Commissioner Kishel, seconded by Commissioner Bosell, that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council return the Johnson's Field Preliminary Plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further discussion and review. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Commissioner Pyron, seconded by Commissioner Kishel, to continue the public hearing until July 25, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Pond View Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #2-78-5) James Conroy Rezoning (Pond View) Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #6-78-9) Mr. Conroy was not present. The Commission had not received the information requested regarding the rezoning. Motion by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner Kishel, to continue Pond View Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to the next meeting (July 25, 1978). Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance #37 Amendment (Comm. #5-78-8) Chairman Retzlaff presented his draft of a proposed amendment to Ordinance 37 which deletes the 4-year mandatory pumping portion of the existing Ordinance. Discussed: mandatory pumping in other Cities, inspection requirements, reporting whether a system was pumped, the lack of response the last two years regarding the reporting form, whether to amend more of the ordinance than just the pumping. Chairman Retzlaff will bring the matter before the City Council at their next meeting to get their opinions on leaving the inspection/reporting portion as is or amending it also. o o c.) o c=) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 11, 1978 Page 8 Donald Janssen Variance (Comm. #7-78-2) Mr. Janssen is asking for a variance to convey 13.15' from Lot 8 to Lot 9, Block 3, Cedar Crest Estates. A portion of a septic system for Lot 9 had been put on Lot 8. Mr. Janssen sold the 13.15' to Mr. Johnson on 4-7-74. Mr. Janssen now lives in Des Moines, Iowa and he sent Dennis Johnson to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to represent him. But Mr. Johnson was not present at the time for discussion on the variance. The Commission discussed sending this to the City Attorney for legal action appropriate for an illegal conveyance of land. This will be continued to the next meeting in order to ask Dennis Johnson to be present and also to allow time for Chairman Retzlaff to check with the Attorney for any legal action that would be appropriate. Discussion of Ordinances 8 and 10 Revision (Comm. #6-77-6) This will be on the next meeting's agenda. I/) '-...../ Adiournment Motion by Commissioner Kishel, seconded by Commissioner Dick, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:45 P.M. ~J~A~~~htA~ Deloris J. an on Commission Clerk (:J