HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember 14, 1978
o
Q
:J
o
o 0
~ ~ ANDOVER
o
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
November 14, 1978
AGENDA
Approval of Minutes
1. Comm. #9-78-6 Discussion of proposed Rum River Ordinance
2. Comm. #2-78-5 Pond View Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing
3. Comm. #10-78-2 Andover Mission Church Special Use Permit
Continued Public Hearing
4. Comm. #9-78-10 Ron Smith - Continued Proposed Registered Land Survey
5. Comm. #9-78-13 Lund's Evergreen Estates Preliminary Plat
Continued Public Hearing
6. Comm. #10-78-4 William Rademacher Rezoning Continued Public Hearing
7. Comm. #10-78-5 Good Value Homes Rezoning Continued Public Hearing
8. Comm. #1-78-3 Junkyard Ordinance
9. Comm. #11-78-1 Al KIous Sketch Plan
10. Comm. #11-78-2 Lester Hughes Lot Split
11. Comm. #11-78-3 Verna Kulenkamp discussion on possible Variance
For publication on November 10, 1978
o
o 0
~ ~ ANDOVER
o
/-~
"-./
REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
November 14, 1978
MINUTES
The Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was started at 6:30 P.M. by
Chairman Larry Retzlaff for the purpose of reviewing and discussing the proposed
Ordinance, relative to the Rum River, to comply with the State's Wild and Scenic
River Act. Chairman Retzlaff called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:45 P.M.
Commissioners Present:
Commissioner Absent:
Also Present:
d'Arcy Bosell, Don Jacobson, Ralph Kishel, Jeannine Pyron
Walter Dick
Dave Pil1atzke, Engineer from T.K.D.A., and others
Minutes of October 24, 1978
<,,+h
Corrections: page 3, 3-rd paragraph, 3rd line - after the word "land" insert
the following: or a financial hardship
page 3, 3rd line from bottom of page - change "petioners" to "petitioners"
Motion by Jacobson, seconded by Kishel, to approve the Minutes as amended.
r-~ Motion carried unanimously.
'-.J
Pond View Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #2-78-5)
The developer is waiting for a decision from the City Council regarding the
rezoning of a portion of this plat before going ahead with this item. The plat
will be placed on the next Commission agenda for discussion.
Andover Mission Church Special Use Permit Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #10-78-2)
Chairman Retzlaff said that he had talked to a representative from the Church
and they are still negotiating for release of the road easement. They will
contact the City when they are ready.
Lund's Evergreen Estates Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #9-78-13)
Bruce Grivna, the surveyor, had asked that the plat be continued to the next meeting.
William Rademacher Rezoning Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #10-78-4)
Mr. Rademacher's planner had stated they didn't have all the information yet
that was requested by the Commission and asked that further discussion be continued
t~ the next meeting, Chairman Retzlaff suggested that this item also be continued
to the January 9, 1979 meeting.
C)
, )
u
u
\
\..)
\
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 14. 1978
Page 2
)
Good Value Homes Rezoning Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #10-78-5)
Chairman Retzlaff read the letter he had received from Frank Voth dated 11-14-78.
It stated, "We would like to request that the rezoning request before your Commission
be continued for 2 months. At the present time we are considering the most
appropriate manner of developing the entire property. In order to make a complete
presentation, we will need additional time to draw data together. It is our
hope that at that time we will have a proposal ready for what will serve the best
interests of your community and our company."
The Commission discussed Ordinance 8, Section 4.17 - D - a, which states that
"Only one corner of any major road intersection may be zoned for Shopping Center
(SC) at anyone time." Chairman Retzlaff said that the 2 rezonings would be
continued until January 9, 1979 and that notices of that meeting should be sent
to those property owners within 350'. It was felt that it would be better to
discuss both rezonings for this area since Good Value Homes is the fee owner
of the property and also to tie the rezoning subject together.
Wobegon Woods Preliminary Plat (Comm. #5-78-4)
,
i
.J
Chairman Retzlaff said that the City Council has referred the plat back to the
Planning Commission and they suggested that the plat be redrawn to eliminate the
single access. Dean Lutterman, owner of the property, stated there are many other
plats that have only one access that are located in the City of Andover. Chairman
Retzlaff mentioned that the City Council has come to a realization that they don't
want single access plats. The Commission has been informed verbally that the
City Council doesn't want single access plats forwarded to them. Mr. Lutterman
said that it has cost a lot of time and money because of this oversight. Chairman
Retzlaff replied that this is a new~. It has been talked about but the
Council has never enforced it until th~Plat. Because of the accessibility
of l73rd, l74th and Heather, they felt nother access could be made. The Council
didn't reject the plat. they referred i to the Planning Commission for further
consideration. .' / L urnJed)
e...+'1 C"'Ln(, 'R~J't;r'nTle",-f. 11-2-<;:'7'
In discussion about connecting to Heather Street, it was mentioned it would be
hard to put in without a jog. Also, it would come close to another low spot
and the lots would drop off so quickly it would not be a decent building site.
Another layout suggested would create a double frontage lot. It was mentioned
that variances have been given for that in the past. There is a ravine similar
to what was considered in the Fox Meadows plat. Mr. Lutterman said that according
to the new Ordinance (8C) there would only be 2 variances now. There are 2 topographical
reasons for having the road layout as shown. He commented that the people that
have contacted him about buying a lot asked if he had good lots on dead-end streets.
People who are moving out here and buying 2~-acre lots want privacy and the way
this was laid out this would be that way. It was mentioned that to impose a
new set of rules (asking for more than one access) at this point, the preliminary
plat stage, seems a little harsh. Discussed previous motion that the Planning
and Zoning Commission had made.
\
J
,)
<)
,,--J
u
,)
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 14, 1978
Page 3
Motion by Retzlaff, seconded by Kishel, that the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommend to the Andover City Council that they approve the Wobegon Woods preliminary
Plat in as much as: 1) A public hearing was held and there was no opposition.
2) The Preliminary Plat is in compliance with existing Ordinances with the following
exceptions: (a) Lots 1 and 3 of Block 1, Lots 1, 3 ,and 6 of Block 2, Lots 1,
3, and 5 of Block 3 are exceptions to Ordinance 8, Section 6.02: (b) exceptions
to Ordinance 8, Section 3.02 AAA and WW on these lots house frontages would have
to be on the longest street frontage. The developer has met with the Planning
and Zoning Commission and has agreed with the proposed location of the house
frontages. It would be a variance on Lot 5. Block 2 as to the minimum width at
setback being less than 300' and the character of the land is such that no other
means of platting the land would allow the necessary width. 3) It is further
understood that the Park and Recreation Commission has agreed to accept $4,245
from the Wobegon Woods Plat and add it to an amount of $2,755 derived from the
Kadlec Addition Plat which will be spent only for the improvement of White Oaks
Country Estates Park which has been specified by the developers. 4) The Engineer
has reviewed the Plat and made comment that the variance would be required on the
length of 174th Lane NW in excess of 1320' and also the two cul-de-sac streets
are in excess of the required 500' minimum length for a cul-de-sac. 5) The Plat
is in conformance with the surrounding area and meets the criteria of the Comprehensive
Development Plan.
'\
)
Vote on motion: yes - Kishel, Bosell, Retzlaff; no - Jacobson, Pyron. Motion
carried. Commissioner Jacobson and Commissioner Pyron stated their reasons for
voting "no" were the same as given on September 26, 1978.
Naming of cul-de-sacs
Engineer Pillatzke briefly explained a proposal for the future naming of cul-de-sacs.
His plan sounded very acceptable and he was asked to get it in writing so the
City can use it as a guideline.
Lester Hughes Lot Split (Comm. #11-78-2)
Mr. and Mrs. Hughes were present to explain their request. They would like to
split off 2~ acres around the house that is about 14 years old. They are in the
process of building a new house on the remainder of their property. All the
land around this 2~ acres belongs to them, therefore no notices of this split
application were sent. The property contains 2.5 acres and over 300' of frontage
on Valley Drive (County Road 58).
'\
j
Motion by Jacobson. seconded by Bosell. that the Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends to the Andover City Council approval of the lot split for
Lester and Donna Hughes. Legal description of the property is as follows: All
that part of the NW~ of the NW~ of Sec. 17, T. 32. R. 24, Anoka County, MN described
as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said Sec. 17; thence S. 890 45 minutes
51 Seconds E. along the N. line of said Sec. 17 a distance of 439.84' to its
intersection with the centerline of Valley Drive; thence S. 30 45 minutes 42
seconds E. along said centerline a distance of 234.4'; thence Southerly continuing
along said centerline and on a tangential curve to the right having a radius of
2204.18' and a delta angle of 110 59 minutes, 33 seconds a distance of 410.74'
to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be hereby described;
'\
, )
\
~. -)
" )
~,
u
/
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 14, 1978
Page 4
thence continuing Southerly along said curve a distance of 50.61'; thence S. 80
13 minutes 51 seconds W. continuing along centerline a distance of 289.39'; thence
South 81046 minutes 09 seconds E. a distance of 300.3'; thence N. 140 56 minutes
26 seconds E. a distance of 342.35'; thence N. 81046 minutes 09 seconds W. a
distance of 340.88' to the actual point of beginning. Containing 2.5 acres, more
or less. Subject to road easement over the Westerly 33' thereof. The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval for the following reasons: 1) All
of the necessary provisions of the lot split Ordinance have been complied with.
2) The Commission finds that the lot split is in conformance with the City's
Comprehensive Development Plan. 3) The Commission finds it does not interfere
with orderly planning and is not contrary to the public's interest. 4) Such
lot split does not nullify the intent of the ordinances of the City of Andover.
5) the Commission recommends the imposition of a $100 park fee for the lot split.
Motion carried unanimously. This will be on the December 5th City Council Agenda.
Verna Kulenkamp discussion on possible Variance (Comm. #11-78-3)
\
Arthur Attleson of K & A Realty was present to represent Mrs. Kulenkamp. In
the NE~ of the NE~ of Section 16 there is a 1320' long easement connecting the
40-acre parcel owned by Mrs. Kulenkamp with Verdin Street. The problem lies in
the fact that the easement is only 16~' wide. Mr. Attleson said the easement
was put on in 1946 and Mrs. Kulenkamp, who is now a widow, would like to sell
that property. The Kulenkamps have harvested nothing from the land; they have
just paid taxes for all these years. Ralph Lund, the property owner to the
North of the easement, will sell extra land but he wants too much. Mr. and
Mrs. Nehrt, the property owners to the South of the easement are unwilling to
negotiate with Mr. Attleson. It would be for one home to be built, on the 40
acres, and for one driveway.
/
It was mentioned that since the roadway is more than 300' long, it would have
to meet the City roadway standards for surfacing, etc. If they had used the
easement, it might be different but from what Mr. Attleson stated, they only
paid taxes. He asked if the grandfather clause would govern this. He stated
that he had been told by 2 people at the court house that all he had to do would
be apply for a building permit and if the permit was turned down, he could sue
the City, etc.
Mr. Attleson was advised that if he wanted to make a xormal request for a variance,
the Attorney could be asked about the grandfather clause; but the l6~' easement
width in no way meets any City standards.
Rum River Ordinance Discussion (Comm. #9-78-6)
The Commission reviewed the remainder of the model Ordinance. Chairman Retzlaff
will submit the changes for typing of a redraft for the Commission.
_/
'- )
,
}
\
.J
,
u
,
)
/
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 14. 1978
Page 5
Al Klous Sketch Plan (Comm. #11-78-1)
Mike Gair, of Westwood Planning and Engineering (surveyor for Mr, Klous), was
present to explain their proposal. There are 117 acres located in the NE portion
of the City in Section 12 that they plan to divide into 31 single family lots with
minimum lot sizes of 2~ acres. The property is located between County Road 18.
Crosstown Boulevard, and Pinger's Plaza. in Ham Lake. County Ditch 58, Branch
7, begins in the Northwest corner of this property. The West portion of the site
is fairly high, cultivated soil. There is a fair amount of birch and oak on
the property. The lots would accommodate on-site septic systems. Mr. Gair met
with the Coon Creek Watershed Board on November 13th for an informal review.
Suggestions/comments: has to have 75' of right-of-way on County Road 18; has
to have 66' of right-of-way on streets in the plat; the plat shows one access
onto County Road 18 with 14 lots coming out; the plat shows one access, over
1320' long, into Ham Lake with 17 lots; cul-de-sac is too long; the area of
Lot 6, Block 3 is more than twice the average size of the other lots; the corners
onto County Road 18 should show radiuses; temporary cul-de-sacs should be shown
on all streets extended to the property edge for future extension; the Council
would prefer bituminous surfacing on the roads; advised him of the park dedication
required. Mr. Gair planned to go ahead with the preliminary plat.
/
Junkvard Ordinance Discussion (Comm. #1-78-3)
The Commission has had the item on the agenda for a long time. After a brief
discussion. it was suggested that the City Attorney and the City Clerk be present
at the next meeting to give their comments on what they think should be changed
in the existing Ordinance.
Ad;ournment
Motion by Jacobson. seconded by Pyron. to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 10:17 P.M.
I
/