Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/08/059 C I T Y O F N 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda February 8, 2005 Andover City Hall Council Chambers 7.00 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes — January 25, 2005. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Lot Split (05 -03) to create two urban residential lots from property located at 14124 Crosstown Boulevard NW. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit (05 -05) to allow existing garage to remain prior to construction of principle structure on property located at 14124 Crosstown Boulevard NW. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit (05 -04) for drive through at Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Marketplace East. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Lot Split (05 -04) to create a rural residential lot and residual parcel at 264 Andover Boulevard NW. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Lot Split (05 -05) to create a rural residential lot and residual parcel at 308 Andover Boulevard NW. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Review of Parkside at Andover Station, an urban residential plat located northwest of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and Bunker Lake Boulevard. 9. WORK SESSION: a. Zoning Ordinance Update i. City Code 12 -6 -5 B. 2. Accessory Building Location ii. City Code 12 -7 -2 Fences and Walls iii. City Code 12 -8 -7 Bulk Liquid Storage 10. Other Business 11. Adjournment • r C I T Y 0 F A 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner SUBJECT: Item 2. Approval of Minutes - January 25, 2005 DATE: February 8, 2005 Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to approve the minutes from the January 25, 2005 meeting. 0 I* r C I T Y O F nalimm ND OVE • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — JANUARY 25, 2005 The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Vice Chairperson Kirchoffon January 25, 2005, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Commissioners Tim Kirchoff, Valerie Holthus, Rex Greenwald, Dean Vatne, Jonathan Jasper and Michael Casey. Commissioners absent: Chairperson Daninger. Also present: City Planner, Courtney Bednarz Associate Planner, Andy Cross Planning Intern, Chris Vrchota Others . Mr. Bednarz stated Item 3 was withdrawn by the applicant and in the work session they brought back the Snowmobile/ATV with some of the corrections discussed and they will not be discussing building height at this time. APPROVAL OFMINUTES. January 11, 2005 Motion by Casey, seconded by Vatne, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent ( Daninger) vote. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING (05 -02) TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM SINGLE FAMILYRURAL RESIDENTIAL R -1 TO SINGLE FAMILY URBAN RESIDENTLAL R -4 FOR PROPERTY LOCA TED AT 1487148 LANE NW. Mr. Cross explained the Planning Commission is asked to review the proposed rezoning to allow the lot split on this property to move forward. Mr. Cross discussed the staff report with the Commission. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — January 25, 2005 Page 3 • Commissioner Greenwald stated the applicant then does not know what the cost will be. Mr. Cross stated it depended on what the City Council will do when it comes to a public improvement project in this area. Mr. Cross stated City sewer will be installed regardless. City water will not. Vice Chair Kirchoff stated if they connect to City sewer and water, they can still use their well to water the lawn and not fall under the restrictions the rest of the City has. Mr. Cross stated this was correct. Commissioner Jasper thought R-4 District lots were required to have City sewer and water. Mr. Cross stated it requires City sewer but not water. Mr. Bednarz stated all plats that are approved within the Urban Service Area are required to have City Sewer and Water and there is a street utility project that provides it for all of the lots. When a lot is split, there are times when water is not immediately available which is the case in this neighborhood because of the way it was developed over time and some of the approvals that have been granted for lot splits without requiring extensions of the water line. The Council is aware of this situation and they are going to explore a public improvement that will take the full sewer and water street project through the neighborhood so that everybody when they subdivide further will have all of those utilities but at the present time, water is not immediately available. • Commissioner Greenwald stated on this particular split, if they decide to build, they would have to do their own and will the City require them to hook up later. Mr. Bednarz stated there are two scenarios, one would be that there is that public improvement and sewer and water is both available but if the public improvement is not done, then the applicant will have to find a way to bring sewer to the property and then will need to dig a well in the interim. Commissioner Jasper asked if this was "putting the cart before the horse" by doing the lot split first without doing the feasibility study first. Mr. Cross stated this is up to the applicant; he can dig a well until utilities become available. Mr. Cross stated the lot split conforms to the City standards and the applicant can move forward as he sees fit. Commissioner Vatne stated if they approve this now and the applicant puts in a well on the split off property, in the future a stub would be put in for water access to both properties, would this have an assessment to both lots or is there some option. Mr. Cross stated every home will be assessed that is affected by the stub addition. Vice Chair Kirchoff asked if every property would be assessed even if they decide not to hookup. Mr. Cross stated they would be assessed for improvements. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — January 25, 2005 Page 5 • WORK SESSION: Commissioner Greenwald thought they did a good job on the City Code 6 -4 -4, Snowmobiles and All Terrain Vehicles. He stated he did call the State today in regards to snowmobile trails. A snowmobile can use the road as long as it is a designated trail. Commissioner Greenwald stated one thing he wanted the City to look into was if they had any specific language for OHM (Off Highway Motorcycle) vehicles. According to the State, it is the same legality as an ATV (All Terrain Vehicles) Vehicle. He stated many times it is in the same money pool as far as trail designation and so forth. He stated they are getting to the point where they need to be more specific on the use of OHM as they have with ATV Vehicles. Commissioner Jasper asked if they should put the same restrictions on OHM as they have for all terrain and snowmobiles. Commissioner Greenwald stated he would. The Commission discussed the current laws and restrictions of OHM Vehicles. Commissioner Greenwald left the meeting at 7:40 p.m. a. Zoning Ordinance Update • i. City Code 12 -3 Zoning District Descriptions Mr. Cross stated the descriptions of the zoning districts are not as accurate and complete as they should be. The proposed changes will be the title "Purpose of Each District" will be changed to "Description of Each District ". The district descriptions will be updated with specific language including location requirements scattered in other sections and the general range of activity that is allowed to help guide rezoning decisions. Commissioner Jasper wondered if there are any R -5 Manufactured Housing District areas in the City. Mr. Cross stated there was not. Commissioner Jasper asked if they should delete this district. Mr. Bednarz stated they cannot delete this because according to State Law they need to provide an area in the City for such a District. Commissioner Jasper wondered in the NB (Neighborhood Business) District it says it can be served by local collector streets but not exclusively local streets. He stated they talked at a previous meeting about a proposed dance studio in a neighborhood business district, which was surrounding by local streets. Are there neighborhood business districts, which are inconsistent with this Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — January 25, 2005 Page 7 • Commissioner Jasper suggesting changing the language in "C" to "clothesline" instead of "laundry drying equipment ". Commissioner Jasper stated in 12 -4-3, Lot Provisions, asked if this was a carry over from previous code provisions and why was seventy-five percent chosen. Mr. Bednarz stated this presently exists in the code and was hard to find unless stumbled upon. Commissioner Jasper stated seventy-five percent seemed to be pretty high. Mr. Bednarz stated they looked at other cities and twenty-five percent to thirty percent of yard space was fairly common for suburban cities. Commissioner Jasper stated in 12- 14 -23c, talks about building heights, are they discussing this now. Mr. Vrchota stated this was being moved out of 12 -45 into that section and then that section as a whole will be discussed at a later date. Commissioner Jasper stated as he read this, in rural areas a property cannot have a barn that is larger than the house by four feet. He stated this does not make sense to him. Mr. Vrchota stated this is referring to a parapet wall. • Commissioner Jasper asked to what "to herein provide" refers. Mr. Bednarz stated this was probably an attorney's comment at one point and could be deleted. Commissioner Vatne stated on 12- 4 -5a2, they tried to shore that up in terms of language and is still hard to understand. He suggested staff break this into a couple of sentences for easier reading. iii. City Code 12 -6 Access Drives: Location Mr. Vrchota stated the information in this section conflicts with the five -foot setback requirement found in section 12- 14- 10 -D -3 —f of the City Code. This section will be stricken from the code. The rest of the chapter will be re- numbered as necessary. Commissioner Jasper asked what happened to shared drives. Mr. Bednarz stated they do have some old situations with shared drives but they are non - conforming. He stated they would like to stick with the five foot setback when possible. • iv. City Code 6 -4 -4 Snowmobiles and All Terrain Vehicles; r h TO: 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US FROM SUBJECT: DATE: Planning and Zoning Commissioners Courtney Bednarz, City Plann# PUBLIC HEARING: Lot Split (05 -03) to create two urban residential lots from property located at 14124 Crosstown Boulevard NW. February 8, 2005 INTRODUCTION The property contains an existing house and detached garage. Two accesses to Crosstown Boulevard presently exist. One of the accesses is used as a farm access road. The farm access road crosses the property and two outlots on route to the farm fields to the west as shown on the attached survey. DISCUSSION Existing Garage The applicant has indicated that he would like the existing garage to remain on Parcel A. City Code 12 -6 requires a Conditional Use Permit for a garage to exist prior to construction of a principle structure. Please refer to the Conditional Use Permit report for additional information. is Existing House The applicant has also indicated that the existing house will be removed. However, the existing house will likely remain during construction of a new house on Parcel B. This is permitted by City Code 12 -4 -3 provided that the existing house is removed within 30 days of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new house. In the interim, the property will not comply with City Code 12 -3 -4 which requires a minimum garage area of 440 square feet. No variance is proposed for this situation. This nonconformity would be allowed to exist until a new home is constructed on Parcel B and this requirement would be met with a new garage. Zoning District Requirements The property is presently zoned R -4, Single Family Urban Residential. The proposed lot split will conform to the lot width, depth and area requirements of this zoning district. Alternate Sketch to Eliminate Driveways on Crosstown Boulevard Staff explored with the applicant the potential to front the properties to the south to eliminate driveways onto Crosstown Boulevard. Unfortunately, one or both of the lots would not meet the lot width requirements. The buildable area on the lot adjacent to Crosstown Boulevard would be minimal. This results from the additional area needed for Crosstown Boulevard, the lot width requirement for corner lots and the building setback from county roads. Finally, adjacent land to the west that is owned by the applicant is designated Agricultural Preserve and cannot be added to the subject property to allow compliance with the City's requirements. • Access The existing lot has two accesses onto Crosstown Boulevard that are proposed to provide access to the two lots. The farm access road will continue to be needed to provide access to the farm fields to the west. This access to Crosstown Boulevard would be shared with proposed Parcel B. The driveway for Parcel A as well as the access and branch of the driveway leading to the new house on 0 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING LOT SPLIT REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE AN URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOT INTO TWO URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOTS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14124 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW (P.I.D 27- 32 -24 -33 -0004) LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT A WHEREAS, Ken Slyzuk, the applicant, has requested approval of a lot split to subdivide an urban residential property pursuant to City Code 13 -1, located at 14124 Crosstown. Boulevard NW; and WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets all requirements of City Code 13 -1 Splitting Lots, Parcels or Tracts of Land; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held pursuant to state statutes; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the lot split as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the lot split on said property subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a street, drainage and utility easement in favor of Anoka County to provide a total of 50 feet for the west half of Crosstown Boulevard NW (CSAH 18) along the entire eastern property line of the subject property. 2. The applicant shall provide a 66 foot wide street, drainage and utility easement in favor of the City to allow future extension of 140'' Avenue NW. The easement shall be perpendicular to the centerline of Crosstown Boulevard for a distance of 75 feet and provide a 300 foot radius curve to the southwest from that point to the west. The easement shall also be centered on the centerline of 140'' Lane NW which exists to the east of the subject property. 3. The applicant shall provide a ten foot wide drainage and utility easement in favor of the City adjacent to the front and rear property lines of both lots and a five foot wide drainage and utility easement along the side property lines of both lots. 4. The applicant shall obtain approval of a conditional use permit to allow the existing garage to remain on Parcel A. In the event that this approval cannot be obtained, the existing detached garage shall be removed. The applicant will be required to eliminate the portion of the driveway that exists within five feet on both sides of the proposed property line and restore the area with sod or seed. . 6. The applicant shall be allowed to retain the existing house on Parcel B in compliance with City Code 12 -4 -313. Exhibit A Legal Description of 14124 Crosstown Boulevard P.I.D 27- 32 -24 -33 -0004 0 • i ;t II ] ►� I[ i'� �I �I ;� :�i III ] :' oil .\ 0 • 0 NND O VE: 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Plann4 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit (05 -05) to allow existing garage to remain prior to construction of principle structure on property located at 14124 Crosstown Boulevard NW. DATE: February 8, 2005 INTRODUCTION As discussed in the previous lot split report, City Code 12 -6 requires a conditional use permit is required to allow a detached garage on a residential property prior to construction of a principle structure (house). DISCUSSION The existing garage is 768 square feet. The R -4 Zoning district allows a total of 1200 square feet of garage space and limits detached garages to one half of the footprint of the principle structure. As a result, the future house would need to have a footprint of at least 1,536 square feet and would be limited to a total of 432 square feet of additional garage space. The existing garage will conform to setback requirements. Applicable Ordinances Chapter 12 -5 -6 B of the Andover City Code provides the following: 1. In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and: a) The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. b) Existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. c) The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the comprehensive plan. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions of the attached resolution. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is asked to discuss the S rec end approval or denial to the City Council. e pe 11 i d, e Be az Cc: Ken Slyzuk 15211 Nightingale Street NW proposed Conditional Use Permit and �A A Exhibit A Legal Description of 14124 Crosstown Boulevard • P.I.D 27- 32 -24 -33 -0004 Outlot B and Outlot C. KENSINGTON ESTATES. according to the recorded plat thereof. Anoka County, Minnesota And, That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SWj of SWI) of Section Twent"&m (271 Township —Thirty (32) Range Twenty —four (24) that Is described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner at the acid Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW} of SWO and proceeding thence East on the South line of the said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW} of SW4) for a dlebmwe of Seven and One —half (74 rods more or less to the center One of the county road known as The Constance Road, formerly known as State Aid Road No. Z and proceeding thence in a Northeasterly dkoctlon on the said center One for a distance of Twenty —few (24) rods and proceeding thence West and parallel with the South line of the said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SN4 of SWJ) to the West line of the said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SV4 of and proceeding thence South on the sold West One to the point of commencement; and contoMMg about two (2) acres of land L� 0 .r�M'aY �.1 � �4 I - ITJ 1 , DY �.m �{�i � �a� XnZAIS AdWi V N3N I L94 _ � C) LL. O O ra ad Cl) L � to C) LU O QL Q) c c Q� a ll LZJ L I R Ft yQ t t • TO: CC: NDOVE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.AN DOVER. MN. US Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: DATE: SUBJECT Courtney Bednarz, City Planner Chris Vrchota, Associate Planner W February 8, 2005 Conditional Use Permit (05 -04) for a drive - through window at Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Marketplace East INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a drive - through window on the north side of their proposed multi -tenant retail building. DISCUSSION As per section 12 -13 -3 of the Andover City Code, a drive - through window is a conditional use in the General Business (GB) zoning district. The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) review process allows for the review of the planned design for traffic circulation, stacking, and potential impacts from noise and lighting on neighboring properties. The site is located north of the Target store. The window would provide drive- through service for a future coffee shop. Traffic would circulate along the east and north sides of the building, with the order board being on the east side and the window near the northwest corner of the building. Impact on neighboring properties will be limited, as the site is bordered by retail development on three sides and Bunker Lake Boulevard to the north. The property across Bunker Lake Boulevard to the north of the site is zoned for commercial use and is covered by a wetland. Applicable Ordinances Chapter 12 -5 -6 B of the Andover City Code provides the following criteria for the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit: 1. In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and: a. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. b. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. c. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. If it shall determine by resolution that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the • health, safety, morals,. or general welfare of the community, nor will cause serious traffic congestion or hazards, nor will seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and that said use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this title and the comprehensive plan, the City Council may grant such permits. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA • RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD AND MARTIN STREET, (PIN 34- 32 -24 -42 -0031) LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Marketplace East, Anoka County, Minnesota WHEREAS, Ryan Companies US, Inc. has requested a Conditional Use Permit for a drive - through window; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of City Code; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit request; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby . agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Conditional Use Permit for a drive - through window on said property with the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon approval of a Commercial Site Plan. 2. Based on the orientation of the building in relation to Bunker Lake Boulevard and agreements between the developer and the Andover Economic Development Authority, landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by City staff as part of the Commercial Site Plan review process. 3. The developer shall extend the pedestrian trail from Martin Street to the sidewalk at the southeast corner of the building. 4. The site shall conform in all ways with the Andover City Code and Andover Station Design Guidelines. 5. The Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to a sunset clause as per section 12- 15 -6 -D of the Andover City Code. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _day of , 2005. CITY OF ANDOVER • ATTEST: Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk Project Narrative • Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Marketplace East Southwest Quadrant of Bunker Lake Boulevard NW and Martin Street - Andover, Minnesota Prepared By: RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. January 18, 2005 For Commercial Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit Introduction On behalf of Ryan Companies US, Inc., RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. is pleased to submit the enclosed plans and documents for the Commercial Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit applications for Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Marketplace East site for review, discussion and approval by the City of Andover. The plans and documents outline the site development Ryan Companies is proposing for the 1.7+ acre site. This application package is anticipated to be heard at the February 8, 2005 Planning Commission meeting and March 1, 2005 City Council meeting. Project Request ■ Approval of Commercial Site Plan Review ■ Approval of Conditional Use Permit for Drive - Through Lane • Project Description/ Background The City of Andover has previously reviewed and approved the overall development of the Andover Marketplace East site. This application package has been prepared for the Lot 2, Block 1 parcel to allow development of a 10,000 square foot multi- tenant retail building with a drive - through facility. The enclosed plans place the proposed retail building at the center of the parcel, orientated inward, towards the Target Greatland store. The site has been designed to integrate the parking access drive of the Target parcel to encourage shared trips amongst the commercial lots. The master development plan has put into place all trunk line utility connections required for the site. The enclosed plans detail the proposed work necessary to develop the Lot 2, Block 1 parcel. Conditional Use Permit Request /Justification The City of Andover Conditional Use Permit application lists the narrative statement criteria required for a Conditional Use Permit. The following responses are provided for this request. ■ The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. No negative effects upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands are anticipated as a result of the proposed development. ■ Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and lands. The master development plan for Andover Marketplace East accounted for the anticipated traffic with full build -out of the project; anticipated traffic conditions are expected to be consistent with the • master development plan. Parking facilities for the proposed 10,000 square foot retail building are provided within the Lot 2, Block 1 parcel. Project Narrative Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Marketplace East January 18, 2005 RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2005 -109 -M Page 1 of 2 J ® m ; �. RM i �`rn -.. - \� eiOlYYO�ouusouer.� - i � �w� - ■�rZ�Sa Eamon MrM WWWW 'Vf - 0 I � I � b i z w V ill r L, it 6 � f o / 0 6 S i 6 Y Y t III II IIII ® I A r•\FT, m� 0 3 b URI /i - 1 NndKd� i W J i Q Pi8P3'1� rowmme I L__3HNIl� J ; a co Z L T I I i i i i �_ A s € W O H ill _JI J L J i�wr -_� Q « ' U 666 Q LU gg g g g W -� € � 8 g■ 1 i iliiiiln 'bY•3id ' Qypp ypg pq � i >er1Ya � b � A � � � I I _� C� gg E €� Q¢ : r i i •1Ye�'i _ z y p q • {L ��W,{� n� pR NF G � � �� 0 1 n � `�Z w�g� a [ y g i Z ] �� Y ■� :� §s 3ee1 s 9 r u��i ss to si 11111 Li 5 C LLI LLJ LU Li 5 -AK 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW. CLAN DOVE R.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners CC: Courtney Bednarz, City Plannl FROM: Andy Cross, Associate Planner,, DATE: February 8, 2005 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING Lot Split (05 -04) to create two lots from property located at 264 Andover Blvd. INTRODUCTION The applicant has applied for a lot split that will divide an 8.9 -acre property into two Rural Residential lots. The existing house will remain on one of the lots. DISCUSSION This lot split is part of a larger development plan for the area south of Andover Boulevard near • the City's border with Ham Lake. Two developers have teamed up and created one unified plan. This lot split, which is accompanied by a lot split request for the adjacent lot to the west, is in the middle of the larger development plan (see attached draft sketch plan). The purpose of these lot splits is to separate a lot for the existing homes from land that will be developed with a future plat. Approval of the lot splits will assist both the homeowners and developers and help to facilitate development in this area of the city. Variances The lot split will create some nonconformities in the short term as illustrated in the following table: The numbers with an asterisk indicate that a variance will be required. It is important to note that these variances are temporary. When the entire area is rezoned as part of the platting process the lots will conform to the City's urban residential requirements. u R -1 Requirements Parcel A Parcel B Lot Width 300 feet 162.5 feet* 95 feet* Lot Depth 150 feet 350 feet 1427.98 feet Lot Area 2.5 acres 1.3 acres* 7.62 acres The numbers with an asterisk indicate that a variance will be required. It is important to note that these variances are temporary. When the entire area is rezoned as part of the platting process the lots will conform to the City's urban residential requirements. u ACTION REQUIRED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the proposed lot split • subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, Andy Cross Associate Planner Cc: Bruce Carlson, Kodiak Homes, Inc., 8512 124' Lane North, Champlin, MN 55316 Jerry R. Long, 308 Andover Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304 John Hartinger, 264 Andover Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304 Ll line of said Lot 1 distance 1770.00 feet southerly of the northwest corner thereof, said line there terminating. C J WHEREAS, Bruce Carlson has requested approval of a lot split on behalf of John Hartinger to subdivide property pursuant to City Code Title 13 Chapter 1, located at 264 Andover Boulevard NW, and; WHEREAS, the lot split will require 3 variances to the City Code: 1) Variance to Lot Size Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3 -4 for 264 Andover Boulevard from 205 acres to 1.3 acres. 2) Variance to Lot Width Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3-4 for 264 Andover Boulevard from 300 feet to 162.5 feet. 3) Variance to Lot Width Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3-4 for the new lot to be created with this lot split from 300 feet to 95 feet. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the special circumstances for the subject property are as follows: a) When development plans for this area move ahead and this area is rezoned to R -4 Single Family Urban, the lot at 264 Andover Boulevard will comply with requirements of the R -4 zoning district. b) The residual lot behind 264 Andover Boulevard is not intended to serve as a single - family lot, but instead is part of a larger development plan for a large area south of Andover Boulevard. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of City Code Title 13, Chapter 1; WHEREAS, the City Council finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover, and; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held pursuant to state statutes, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the lot split as requested, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the lot split on said property with the following conditions: Approval of variances: a. Variance to Lot Size Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3-4 for 264 Andover Boulevard from 205 acres to 1.3 acres. b. Variance to Lot Width Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3 -4 for 264 Andover Boulevard from 300 feet to 162.5 feet. c. Variance to Lot Width Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3 -4 for the new lot to be created with this lot split from 300 feet to 95 feet. • . 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners CC: Courtney Bednarz, City Planndy FROM: Andy Cross, Associate Planner DATE: February 8, 2005 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING Lot Split (05 -05) to create two lots from property located at 308 Andover Blvd. INTRODUCTION This lot split is moving forward with the lot split at 264 Andover Boulevard. The applicant has applied for a lot split that will divide a 9.8 -acre property into two Rural Residential lots. The existing house will remain on one of the lots. DISCUSSION This lot split is part of a larger development plan for the area south of Andover Boulevard near the City's border with Ham Lake. Two developers have teamed up and created one unified plan. This lot split, which is accompanied by a lot split request for the adjacent lot to the west, is in the middle of the larger development plan (see attached draft sketch plan). The purpose of these lot splits is to separate a lot for the existing homes from land that will be developed with a future plat. Approval of the lot splits will assist both the homeowners and developers and help to facilitate development in this area of the city. Variances The lot split will create some nonconformities in the short term as illustrated in the following table: The numbers with an asterisk indicate that a variance will be required. It is important to note that these variances are temporary. When the entire area is rezoned as part of the platting process the lots will conform to the City's urban residential requirements. R -1 Requirements Parcel A Parcel B Lot Width 300 feet 162.5 feet* 257.77 feet* Lot Depth 150 feet 350 feet 1401.71 feet Lot Area 2.5 acres 2.07 acres* 7.73 acres The numbers with an asterisk indicate that a variance will be required. It is important to note that these variances are temporary. When the entire area is rezoned as part of the platting process the lots will conform to the City's urban residential requirements. ACTION REOUIRED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the proposed lot split • subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, Andy Cross Associate Planner Cc: Bruce Carlson, Kodiak Homes, Inc., 8512 124' Lane North, Champlin, MN 55316 Jerry R. Long, 308 Andover Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304 John Hartinger, 264 Andover Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304 • • line of said Lot 1 distance 1770.00 feet southerly of the northwest comer thereof, said line there terminating. • WHEREAS, Bruce Carlson has requested approval of a lot split on behalf of Jerry Long to subdivide property pursuant to City Code Title 13 Chapter 1, located at 308 Andover Boulevard NW, and; WHEREAS, the lot split will require 3 variances to the City Code: 1) Variance to Lot Size Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3 -4 for 308 Andover Boulevard from 2.5 acres to 2.07 acres. 2) Variance to Lot Width Requirement in City Code Section 12 -34 for 308 Andover Boulevard from 300 feet to 162.5 feet. 3) Variance to Lot Width Requirement in City Code Section 12 -34 for the new lot to be created as a condition of this lot split from 300 feet to 257.77 feet. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the special circumstances for the subject property are as follows: a) When development plans for this area move ahead and this area is rezoned to R -4 Single Family Urban, the lot at 308 Andover Boulevard will comply with requirements of the R -4 zoning district. b) The residual lot behind 308 Andover Boulevard is not intended to serve as a single - family lot, but instead is part of a larger development plan for a large area south of Andover Boulevard. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of City Code Title 13 Chapter 1; WHEREAS, the City Council finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover, and; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held pursuant to state statutes, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the lot split as requested, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the lot split on said property with the following conditions: Approval of variances: a. Variance to Lot Size Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3 -4 for 308 Andover Boulevard from 2.5 acres to 2.07 acres. b. Variance to Lot Width Requirement in City Code Section 12 -34 for 308 Andover Boulevard from 300 feet to 162.5 feet. c. Variance to Lot Width Requirement in City Code Section 12 -3 -4 for the new lot to be created as a condition of this lot split from 300 feet to 257.77 feet. C.J li 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 • FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Plann+ SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Review of Parkside at Andover Station, an urban residential plat located northwest of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and Bunker Lake Boulevard. DATE: February 8, 2005 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the Preliminary Plat with Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) review for the residential component of Andover Station North. DISCUSSION Conformance with Local Plans and Ordinances 1. The property is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and within the current stage of sewer expansion. A previous Comprehensive Plan Amendment changed • the land use designation of the property from General Business to Urban Residential Medium Density. 2. The property is currently zoned General Business. The Planning Commission previously recommended approval of a rezoning to M- 1,Multiple Dwelling Medium Density. The Council elected to table the rezoning to be reviewed in conjunction with the preliminary plat. No further action on the rezoning is necessary from the Planning Commission. The proposed project requires Planned Unit Development Review to establish standards unique to this development. The Planning Commission is asked to review the proposed P.U.D. based on new City Code 13 —3, "Planned Unit Development. " Site Design The Preliminary plat is arranged to provide two styles of housing, served by a loop street with trails to provide pedestrian access. No street connection to the west is proposed. The single level townhouses and a large wetland and stormwater pond comprise the perimeter of the proposed project and the larger two level townhouses are located within the interior of the proposed project. The two level townhomes will utilize private common driveways for access to the public streets similar to the Village of Andover Station project. The Development Standards section of the staff report describes the details of the proposed planned unit development. S • Planned Unit Development (PUD) Review — Parkside at Andover Station • Applicable Ordinances City Code 13 -3 -9 regulates the findings that are required for a PUD to be approved: 1. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. 3. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of PUD. 4. The PUD is of composition and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence on any subsequent unit. PTTTI ilnvPlnnmr+n� Cnprifiratinna No. Item M -1 Standard P.U.D. Request Reason for Request 1 Min. Lot Width 150 feet 34 to 72 feet 150 feet is an outdated requirement established for inhomes on a single lot. The proposed lot width is a function of the unit style which clusters units into a single structure. This mode of development 5 Side Setback 20 feet 0 to 39 feet maximizes common open space. 2 Min. Lot Depth 150 feet 56 to 167 feet Same as above. Additional rear yard space is provided adjacent to the single family 6 Rear Setback 30 feet 15 -80 feet neighborhood to the west. Rear yards along the north side will be adjacent to a community park. Rear yards to the south will be adjacent to a large w etland. 3 in. Lot Area 6,000 square fee 927 to 15,952 Same as above. 7 Street Width 33 feet ;- uare feet Conforms to standard public street design. 4 Front Setback 30 feet 20 feet The reduced front yard setback allows buildings loser to the street and increases open space at he perimeter of the development. Sufficient space is provided to park at least two vehicles in each rivewa . 5 Side Setback 20 feet 0 to 39 feet Same as #1 above. A minimum of 25 feet is provided between structures which exceeds the M- 1 zoning district requirements. 6 Rear Setback 30 feet 15 -80 feet Smaller rear yards are adjacent to a future c ommunity park or a large wetland as described a bove. The minimum setback from the single f amily neighborhood to the west is 36.8 feet which e xceeds the M -1 zoning district standards. 7 Street Width 33 feet 3 feet for public Conforms to standard public street design. 2 feet for private pame as #1 above. City Code 13 -3 -11 identifies Desirable PUD Design Qualities that are sought in any PUD proposal. These qualities are listed below. A letter from the applicant addressing these items is attached. • A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this Chapter. Location Map Preliminary Plat Plan Set • Building Elevations Applicant's Letter - P.U.D. Narrative Description Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed project subject to the conditions of the attached resolution. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development with any modifications the Commission feels are necessary. Submitted, CC: Greg Schlink, Bruggeman Homes 3564 Rollingview Drive White Bear Lake, MN 55110 • • 6i 1. The proposed project has been designed to provide two types of housing and arranged to provide some variety within a unified overall theme. This design utilizes similar materials to reduce maintenance costs to allow the project to remain attractive and well maintained into the future. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect on the property values and scenic views of the surrounding area, and; WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the plat, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Preliminary Plat with Planned Unit Development Review, with the following conditions: 1. The Preliminary Plat shall conform to the plans revised January 28, 2005 and stamped received on January 31, 2005. 2. The development shall conform to City Code Titles 11, 12, and 13, as well as Exhibit B "Parkside at Andover Station Design Standards ". Exhibit B shall regulate when in conflict with the City Code. 3. Exhibit B shall regulate the lot dimensions, setbacks, area identification sign and landscaping plan for the proposed development. 4. A variance to City Code 11 -3 -3G. to allow a street terminating in a cul -de -sac to exceed 500 feet in length is hereby approved. 5. A variance to City Code 9 -1 -4. to allow similar structures within 300 feet of one another is hereby approved. 6. The developer obtains all necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU, MPCA, Anoka County Highway Department and any other agency that may be interested in the site. 7. Park dedication and trail fees shall be based paid on a per unit basis at the rate in effect at the time of preliminary plat approval. This payment shall be based on the number of units on the final plat(s) and shall be made prior to the City's release of the final plat(s). 8. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies and guidelines. 9. Such plat approval is contingent upon a development agreement acceptable to the City Attorney. 10. A property owners association shall be created with the following documents provided to the City Attorney for review and approval prior to being recorded with the final plat in accordance with City Code 11 -2-3: a. Articles of Incorporation b. By -laws of the association c. Declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions regulating the properties, exterior maintenance of the homes and maintenance of the common areas. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 2005. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor `w; @C 0 :I RTAl l 0 C� • e �1 F-P'CI sal$ I� I IIIII� LU U � V � \IoPlel 1 .a or y d`s s s I D yy e Px[ I W Z T P � 3��3 Lij C Pail .o �Eii "i ss a s� C1 li Pll[ IP W s— We ----- --� - -T I s a I I la I .Pai Is M 4 OT ry OL[ I 0 a j r Pxi s le zl "r"9 >Tf » _ 196Z-OLL -lS9 NYId NOISN3W10 OIISS NW '371Y1 NY38 3L11M ANYNIW1138d 3AIN0 M3NONmoa 1.9SS 'SMUMONd r OS#os[ N<�LLY1S 8 6/E °.::. \� .. .,_..�.. ""' �'°'• Sxosrm 311 NYW3'Y�f1N8 LY 3015NiNd 0 C� • e �1 F-P'CI sal$ I� I IIIII� LU U � V � \IoPlel 1 .a or y d`s s s I D yy e Px[ I W Z T P � 3��3 Lij C Pail .o �Eii "i ss a s� C1 li Pll[ IP W s— We ----- --� - -T I s a I I la I .Pai Is M 4 OT ry OL[ I 0 a j r Pxi s le zl "r"9 >Tf » _ _� cslrcPrP� i nav r Yn wn. w mm. wwwy ....v.v ,s, �— ON ln — Q�y{LV0 I M9CLf00L tB6Z- OLL-l59 NVId /nun IJ IOt L55 Nw '3NV121Y3B 31IwA _ AlNNIIYIl3tld 3AW0 M3AONTOtl 49S£ I _y }os3..s�•ayowr _�_ 0 • 0 0 9 t96Z- 014 -I99 NVId 3dVOSONVI 11Nn IVJIdk1 OIISS NW '3NV1 Ntl38 311NM 3AIN0 M 3IAONIIION 995C 'S31LN3dONd yy�Cxv NOLLV� S !!3/.[)ONV C/Z W6.38 311 Wrt300f1NB ltl 306NNVd M. .I • = • l i p l�!!!!�l�I�!!S!Srl��!I I� +. 0 dr. 9�c F ; r y,i s7 G rta0a4grt M Mart ki rt04 MW Ft, Arrr.r�rrrrrirrrrrirr�rrr - • F @IILIIIII�IEI�I�IhIEhI `_- �= aD ED aD aD sD �IIrIIl01�IILLIaaa�l ea �� sr cD Eo cD aD sD � eD ���, sD G rt,�i rta rt,�w: M Mw 3 ^ -. CD r•G•��rt "5r p PC K� 4 "�•��� CD • iiliYil ��I`III�I`I'II�I�IYI1 - 4 � ,' cD ■ �' sD . rer��.i i i�rn rri�i r �i�rrrir�rl�l�rrlrlilrli Ep �� ".', 6D dD rg E '� r � M CD 4D � • Mill IIEIII'll I1IEIEI6III cD 6D cD aD sD ' eD cD cD cD sD - �IIIIIIIIIIICI`II�II,I G . rtawawWrt.+rt,rt � rt rt rt: 1�1 6D � C �� • rlrli�l���i���l�l�l�l�i� �� �?e.Pi �.w , i� �Ia�� Q� 0 1 1 3 - 1 11113 1 . 1`I I`ILI cD iri�lei�rrArrieiei��He. �rrr'rrrlirir�rii�irrrli ' - . j °� 1 6D r ,•d� , ti `� " lip ��.���� @IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGI �IIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIPIIIII' L1 0 E 11 / Fr it y l 0 on 0 on •..• i ..IL I HH // I I SEEN SEEN I �r��ll II ■■■■' man ff r/ d at the one level townhomes as minimal buffering is required to the adjacent park and storm pond. There • are no backyards with a back -to -back to orientation. The back to side orientation between the two level townhomes and one level townhomes is buffered by preserving a substantial cluster of frees between the units. D. Preserves existing stands of trees and /or significant trees. A majority of the existing stands of trees will be preserved. E. Provides considerable landscaping treatments that compliment the overall design and contribute toward an overall landscaping theme. A landscape plan has been provided. The plan demonstrates a consistent landscape design theme for plantings for each townhome unit. The plan further provides buffering to adjacent uses and a consistent street tree design. F. Preserves significant usable space on individual lots or through the provision of open space. Open space is provided around each of the one level townhome units. A private entry porch is provided for each of the two level townhome units, and end units have private patios. Visible open space is provided to most units by being adjacent to wetlands, storm ponds, the city park, or preserved woodland areas. G. Provides an attractive streetscape through the use of undulating topography, landscaping, decorative street lighting, decorative mailbox groupings, retaining walls, boulders, fencing, area identifications signs, etc. The flat nature of the property prohibits undulating topography or retaining walls to be considered as site amenities. The entry monument and street lighting are detailed in the Preliminary Plat and P.U.D. booklet as well as the landscape plan. H. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high quality building materials for unique design and detailing. Building elevations are detailed in the Exterior Elevations submitted. The architectural detailing demonstrates the use of a variety of siding styles by combining lap siding, shake siding and stone. Varying roof styles and pitches provide further interest. Durable, low maintenance materials were selected to provide a consistent look throughout the life of the project. I. The lasting quality of the development will be ensured by design, maintenance and use guidelines established through an owners association. A declaration of restrictive covenants will be recorded with the property which will include the establishment of a homeowners association to enforce the document. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, • W Gregory . Schlink Brugge Properties, LLC LAProjeclslAndom'Andover Station NorthVAppro istAndot22904CBednarzPUD.doc ■J 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Plann4 SUBJECT: WORK SESSION: Zoning Ordinance Update DATE: February 8, 2005 INTRODUCTION Please find attached the following proposed code revisions: • City Code 12 -6 -5 B. 2. Accessory Building Location • City Code 12 -7 -2 Fences and Walls • City Code 12 -8 -7 Bulk Liquid Storage DISCUSSION Staff will present each item individually to the Planning Commission. ACTION REQUESTED Please discuss and make a recommendation for each item. Attachments City Code 12 -6 -5 B. 2. Accessory Building Location City Code 12 -7 -2 Fences and Walls City Code 12 -8 -7 Bulk Liquid Storage Res ct lly submi d, ar 9 2. Fences shall not be placed in any utility easement where any under • around utifity is present. Fences may be placed within other utility easements so Iona as they do not interfere in any way with existing under around or above around utilities. The existence and location of private utility easements and equipment must be determined by contacting Gopher State One Call. The City or any utility company hav_ina authority to use such easements shall not be liable for repair or replacement of such fences in the event they are moved, damaged, or destroyed by virtue of the lawful use of said easement 3. No fence shall be constructed so as to enclose, hinder, or restrict access to utility boxes, fire hydrants, or any other above ground utilities. 4. Fences on corner lots shall not encroach upon the Clear View Triangle as defined in 12 -2 -2 of this code. 5. Fences shall not be constructed or placed in such a manner so as to obstruct the flow of water to or through drainaae areas or wetlands. In easements which are for the purpose of providing access to drainage and ponding facilities for maintenance work, access gates shall be provided through the easement area at the owners expense. 12 -7 -3: REGULATIONS RELATED TO FENCE HEIGHT AND 14E :'- A. Any finee, hedge wa l l i ft exeess F si x c e+ (6') height shell m eet the In the side and rear yards, behind the principal structure, fences up to a height of six (6) feet are allowed. B. Any fenee, hedge, wa4l, or- similar- baffier- leeated in the red &0 yaf +1. 1 s h a ll + b F fe /A >\ i n height a obstfue+ vi a nd the eb ever- ereate a a aii o xiacarv, ex eepc f9 th ('ellew}ng"emamenW fences",-, as defined see 12 2 1 F +1.' titl D 1 s i n g l e J F •1., rural re s ide..+:el eaa U_ 2 s „ ie F •1 + + zon di + ' + prov th f enee ee nf fms ,. „ +1, t ffe v ims + a +e + r 1., , & e+ (6') 1+eei Fences located in front rcgaii£ cnrc- m. �- cmm�- zav r 'brvuc cr�axcm- Si�i-xccc�v -7 -xxx xx g.. of the principal structure or in side yards adiacent to the street on corner lots, shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. In the R -1 Single- Family Rural Residential and R -2 Single - Family Estate zoning districts, "ornamental fences ", as defined in section 12 -2 -24- of this title, of up to six (6) feet in height are permitted provided the fence eenfeFms +e +Ye a visibili4y mqui -c ==c ==-c does not code. L. J —3— • 12 -7 -6: EXEMPTIONS FROM PROVISIONS: Fences which are for the sole purpose of containing farm animals are not subject to the provision of this title. (Ord. 8PPPPPP, 8 -20 -2002; amd. 2003 Code) 0 • 12 -6 -5 -F • Backeround This section addresses accessory structures located nearer to the front lot line than the principle structure. It currently requires that the finish materials to be similar to and compatible with those on the principle structure. The City has been applying a policy requiring the finish materials on accessory structures to match finish materials on the principle structure. The purpose of this is to ensure that a high visual standard is maintained along street site lines. Proposed Change The code will be revised, requiring finish materials on accessory structures located in front of the principle structure to match those of the principle structure. 12 -6 -5: LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: F. �m Front Yard Setback Requirements: No detached garages or other accessory buildings shall be located nearer the front lot line than the principal structure except as follows: 1. On residential parcels with a lot area of one acre or more, a detached garage or accessory building may be constructed closer to the front lot line than the principal structure; however, the minimum distance it may be from the front lot line is sixty feet • (60'). 2. All detached garages or accessory buildings constructed nearer the front lot line than the principal structure shall be similar in design so as to be compatible with the principal structures. On all such structures, the front of the structure and anv side facing a public street shall be finished with the same exterior finish materials as the principle structure. The remaining sides shall have exterior fmish materials that are similar and compatible to those on the principle structure. (Please see the attached examples A & B.) --7— ACXAM Pi 12 , A lto s O ,► 0 0 s �o 1 -- 333.93- - -- -� , 1 0 wa a capacity in excess of one thousand (1,000) eallons shall be required to obtain a • permit from the Fire Department prior to installation, exceptions are noted below. All public agencies (including school districts, city, county and state) shall be entitled to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for a tank regardless of the zoning district that they are located in. B. 2L. The governing body may require the development of diking around said tanks, suitably sealed, to hold a leakage capacity equal to one hundred fifteen percent (115 %) of the tank capacity. - ... AAA B. 2L. The governing body may require the development of diking around said tanks, suitably sealed, to hold a leakage capacity equal to one hundred fifteen percent (115 %) of the tank capacity. - ... C. Exceptions. The provisions of this subchapter do not apply to: 1. Farm liquid storage tanks of 1,000 gallons or less capacity used for storing motor fuel for agricultural purposes; 2. Tanks of 1,000 gallons or less capacity used for storing heating oil (existing only) for consumptive use on the premises where stored; 3. Tanks located in an undereround area (existing only), including basements, cellars, if the storage tank is located upon or above the surface of the floor; 4. Septic tanks. D. Installation, Alteration, Repair or Removal Permits. 1. The installation, alteration, repair or removal of any liquid storage system governed by this subchapter requires permits issued by the Fire Chief pursuant to the provisions of the Minnesota State Fire Code and any other applicable code, ordinance, statute, rule pr National Fire Prevention Association Standards; 2. Permits and fees. The issuance of permits and the collection of fees shall be in accordance with the fee schedule adopted by the City Council in the amount provided by the fee resolution, set forth in this code; 3. The Fire Chief may deny a permit to persons not capable of performing pursuant . to ordinance requirements. 87 -11 Independent School Dist. #11 • Underground fuel storage tank 150th Lane NW and Hanson Blvd. NW 7 -30 -87 (Does not give # of tanks or size) 88 -10 William Rademacher Installation of gas tanks, motor fuel, and propane tanks Outlot A of Kensington Estates 3rd Addition 6 -29 -88 (Does not give # of tanks or size) 88 -11 William Rademacher Installation of motor fuels, gas tanks, and propane tanks Lot 1, Block 6 of Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd Addition 8 -2 -88 (Does not give # of tanks or size) 88 -14 Dreher and Associates Installation of gas tanks and motor fuel Outlot A of Hidden Creek 2nd Addition 8 -31 -88 (Does not give # of tanks or size) 90 -16 City of Andover 1 - 550 gallon oil storage tank 1785 Crosstown Blvd. NW 10 -9 -90 91 -1 City of Andover 1 - 2,500 gallon diesel storage tank 1 - 1,000 gallon unleaded gas storage tank 1785 Crosstown Blvd. NW 1 -7 -91 93 -11 Super America Group 4 - underground storage tanks for bulk storage of gas 12,000 and 10,000 gallon NE corner of Bunker Lake Blvd. NW and Hanson Blvd. NW 7 -12 -93 93 -13 Q Midwest, Inc. dba Total Mart 1 - 500 gallon above ground storage tank for bulk storage of propane 13725 Crosstown Drive NW 7 -30 -93 93 -17 Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 3 - underground storage tanks for bulk storage of liquid fuels 13650 Hanson Blvd. NW 11 -5 -93 (Does not give size of tanks) • —/9— 98 -15 Ed Fields & Sons • Install a 1,000 gallon underground waste oil storage tank 15421 Round Lake Blvd. NW 8 -4 -98 98 -17 Riccar Heating & Air Conditioning Install a 2,000 gallon above ground gasoline tank 2387 Commercial Blvd. NW 9 -22 -98 99 -25 Kottke Bus Company Install a 6,000 gallon underground waste oil storage tank 13625 Jay St. NW 10 -8 -99 01 -02 Anoka - Hennepin Independent School District —Rum River Elementary Install one (1) 10,000 gallon underground double wall fuel oil storage tank 169xx Verdin St. NW 1 -05 -01 01 -02A Anoka- Hennepin Independent School District — Andover High School Install a 10,000 gallon below ground bulk fuel storage tank 2115 Andover Blvd. NW 7 -27 -01 01 -04 Anoka County Highway Dept. Install a 12,000 gallon above ground bulk fuel storage tank • 1440 Bunker Lake Blvd. NW 5 -5 -01 03 -08 Conoco Station — Andover Clocktower Commons Install (1) one 15,000 gallon tank and (3) three 6,000 gallon tanks 15246 Bluebird St. NW 7 -22 -03 CUP Bulk Storage Tanks/bh 2 -03 -05 —/.S—