The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/10/04ANLb Y +Q F CAVE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda August 10, 2004 Andover City Hall Council Chambers 7.00 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes — July 27, 2004 3. Resolution Modifying Development District No. 1 and Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No. 1 -4. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit (04 -06) to allow institutional sign area of up to 100 square feet for Andover Christian Church located at 16045 Nightingale Street NW. 5. Variance (04 -06) to vary from the minimum lot size requirements of City Code 5- IA for sheltering horses on property located at 17536 Quay Street NW. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Residential Sketch Plan for an urban residential development located at 15941 Hanson Boulevard NW. 7. Other Business a. Reschedule September 14, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting 8. Adjournment • C I T Y O F I�DOVE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner SUBJECT: Item 2. Approval of Minutes - July 27, 2004 DATE: August 10, 2004 Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to approve the minutes from the July 27, 2004 meeting. • • C I T Y O F ND 0VE _ • *r ca_W b coo PLANMNGAND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — JUL Y27, 2004 11 0 The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Daninger on July 27, 2004, 7:02 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present Commissioners absent: Also present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES. July 13, 2004 Chairperson Daninger, Commissioners Tony Gamache, Rex Greenwald, Dean Vatne, Jonathan Jasper and Michael Casey. Commissioner Tim Kirchoff. City Planner, Courtney Bednarz Planning Intern, Chris Vrchota Others Motion by Gamache, seconded by Casey, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, I- absent ( Kirchoff) vote. VARIANCE 04 -04 TO VAR YFROMREAR YARD SETBA CK REQ UIREMENTS FOR PORCHADDITIONAT 13542 POPPYSTREET NW. Mr. Vrchota explained that the applicants are requested a 6 -foot variance to the rear yard setback requirement to allow the construction of a 12x 12 sun porch. Mr. Vrchota discussed the staff report with the Commission. Commissioner Vatne stated in reading through the staff report, there were three points that are made to help support the hardship and he wondered if they were points that were brought up by staff or the applicant. Mr. Vrchota stated they are points from the applicant. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —July 27, 2004 Page 3 • PUBLIC HEARING: RESIDENTIAL SKETCHPLAN FOR KIMBERLY OAKS, A RURAL RESIDENTLAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED EAST OF VERDINSTREET AT 165 AVENUE NW. Mr. Bednarz explained that the Planning Commission is asked to review a sketch plan containing ten rural residential lots. Mr. Bednarz discussed the staff report with the Planning Commission. Commissioner Gamache stated he counted nine lots and an outlot. He wondered if they were planning on making Outlot A buildable. Mr. Bednarz stated they were, as it is drawn on the plans, it would be provided access on the cul -de -sac and would be a lot. Staff would require this to be labeled with a lot and block number as currently designed. Commissioner Gamache asked how long the permanent cul -de -sac was. Mr. Bednarz stated it was approximately 1000 -1100 feet long. Commissioner Gamache asked if the Fire Chief has given him any feedback regarding the length. Mr. Bednarz stated the Fire Chief has indicated they are most interested in the street being extended to the north providing a second access in the future and would be a part of the review in the future development. Commissioner V atne asked if there had been any proposals on the property to the north. Mr. Bednarz stated there has been interest in what is going on with this development but nothing as far as development. Commissioner Jasper asked if the cul -de -sac was measured from Uplander or Verdin to make it one thousand feet in length. Mr. Bednarz stated it is measured from the center line of Verdin Street, which would be the first opportunity to have two entrances. Commissioner Jasper asked how long it was from Uplander to the cul -de -sac. Mr. Bednarz' stated it was roughly half of that distance. Commissioner Gamache asked if, and or when the temporary cul -de -sac became a through street on Uplander Street make this a legal cul -de -sac. Mr. Bednarz stated it would be, if not at five hundred feet, it would be very close. Commissioner Vatne asked if there was any possibility to loop the street back in along Verdin Street similar to the development to the west. Mr. Bednarz stated this was how the development was initially designed in a sketch plan, however due to the Counties spacing guidelines since Silver Meadows was developed, that is not an option. Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Gamache, to open the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Kirchoff) vote. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — July 27, 2004 Page 5 • PUBLIC HEARING: RESIDENTIAL SKETCHPLANFOR SILVER MEADOWS WEST, A RURAL RESIDENTLAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF 7' AVENUE AND 165 VENUE NW. Mr. Bednarz explained that the Planning Commission is asked to review a sketch plan containing 17 rural residential lots. Mr. Bednarz discussed the information with the Commission. Commissioner Jasper asked if there was a reason why they did not have a connection going to the south of the development so this could end up not being a permanent cul -de- sac. Mr. Bednarz stated there is some wetland to the south and the area is already developed with lots fronting on Valley Drive. Commissioner Gamache asked if they would have to grant variances on the lots going along 7"' Avenue because of double frontage. Mr. Bednarz stated they would not. Due to the fact that it is a County arterial road, double frontage lots are permitted in that situation. Motion by Gamache, seconded by Vatne, to open the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Kirchoff) vote. • Mr. Jerry Foss, New Brighton, Developer of Property, stated they did considerable background after talking to Mr. Bednarz because he suggested bringing the road out on the south to 7th Avenue and he suggested they talk to Ms. Jane Rose at the Highway Department. He stated they had two discussions with Ms. Rose and for safety reasons, they do not want any roads to come out onto 7th Avenue because of the rise and fall of the road and they were concerned with possible accidents. They were opposed to any roads coming out onto 7"' Avenue. Mr. Foss stated they also have a fairly large wetland to the north and it did not make much sense to try to bring a road through there and also wetland and houses to the north. He stated the option they had was to put in a cul -de -sac. He noted the development is about sixty -six acres and could be up to sixteen lots so the density factor would be four acres per lot. On the cul -de -sac, there will actually only be two houses. The other challenge was the property was bordered by three County Roads. He stated there is a possibility of taking back 165"' Avenue and making that a City road but that was not official. Mr. Bud Holst, 4276 165"' Avenue, stated the discussion of possibly giving 165"` Avenue back to the City, he would like to know what the ramifications would be of the property owners on the roadway. He thought there were 17 lots showing on the map and where they are also showing a potential ghost route for a road going through his property to • further land to the east, which are mostly residential at this point so he stated he would be interested to know how this would work and what the ramifications would be. Mr. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —July 27, 2004 Page 7 • efforts are needed. They will need to compensate for the area that is filled if they are allowed to do that. Commissioner Vatne asked if there is any tree cover in any parts of the proposed development. Mr. Bednarz stated there is some tree cover on the majority of the upland area. He showed an aerial map of the area. Commissioner Greenwood asked why they did not connect the road through the development which would eliminate some of the problems. He remembered reading in the Anoka County report about the possibility of temporary access onto 7 Avenue. if they leave it like it is, is there no way to connect the roads. Mr. Bednarz stated it is not feasible or possible to connect the wetlands from the north to south. There may be some way to do this through an extensive effort. Commissioner Vatne stated they would address some type of tree preservation when they review the preliminary plat but he wanted to mention this to the developer. Mr. Bednarz stated they will get more into that as part of the preliminary plat. Mr. Foss stated they developed Silver Meadows off of Verdin Street and there were some trees there and they spent a lot of money placing pine trees around the development. They did take down some of them but they also transplanted some to make it look nice. He stated they will have to take some of the trees down but will save what they can because they know what value the trees have on property and they plan on building expensive executive homes. Commission Vatne asked if these will be custom homes similar in nature to those at Silver Meadows. Mr. Foss stated they would be. Commissioner Jasper stated they have struggled with the five hundred foot cul -de -sac and his concern was that this was not a temporary one, it is permanent. Chairperson Daninger concurred. Chairperson Daninger summarized the concerns of the Planning Commission in regards to long cul -de -sacs. He stated they would need a definition of an emergency access onto 7''. He stated he liked the idea of four plus acres per lot. Another concern was the issue of keeping as many trees as possible. He would like to see the reasons why the cul -de- sac is not a through street, other than costs. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the August 4, 2004 City Council meeting. OTHER BUSINESS. • Mr. Bednarz updated the Planning Commission on related items. 0 I T Y O F [DOVE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Will Neumeister, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution Modifying Development District No. 1 and Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No. 1-4 DATE: August 10, 2004 On May 11, 2004 the Planning Commission reviewed a similar resolution and minutes from that meeting are attached. Since then there are changes that have been proposed to the size of the Tax Increment Financing District. The Andover Economic Development Authority (EDA) and the City of Andover are considering a proposal to enlarge the area involved in the proposed Tax Increment District and it necessitates adoption of a modification to the development program for Development District Number 1, to establish Tax Increment Financing District Number 14 (TIF District No. 14) and adopt a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan"). DISCUSSION TIF District No. 14 will be a redevelopment tax increment financing district which has a maximum life of 26 years of tax increment (or a sborter period as determined by the City Council). Tax increments collected from TIF District No. 14 will enable the City of Andover to facilitate the demolition of several substandard buildings. New buildings will be constructed that will serve primarily as office and warehouse facilities for service businesses, within the City of Andover. The location of TIF District No. 1-4 can be seen on the attached maps. The TIF Plan contains the estimated fiscal and economic implications of the proposed TIF District. The City Council will hold a public hearing on the plan on August 17, 2004. A representative of Ehlers Associates, will be present at the meeting to answer any questions you may have. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is asked to review the information, discuss the amended documents related to the proposed TIF District. Also, adopt the attached resolution to indicate the Planning Commission has determined the Program Modification and TIF Plan conform to the general plans for development and redevelopment of the City as described in the Comprehensive Plan. Reesppeectttfully Submitted' Will Neumeister Attachments TIF Documents (modification of Development District No. 1) Resolution Map of Development District No. 1 and TIF District No. 1 -4 0 EHLERS • & ASSOCIATES INC July 16, 2004 BY FAX AND BY REGULAR MAIL Maureen Devine Tom Heidemarm, School Board Clerk Anoka County Property Records/Taxation Division Anoka- Hennepin School District No. 11 2100 3rd Avenue 11299 Hanson Boulevard NW Anoka, MN 55303 -2265 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 -3799 Re: The Andover Economic Development Authority/City of Andover and the proposed establishment of a redevelopment tax increment financing district. The Andover Economic Development Authority ( "EDA ") and the City of Andover ( "City") are considering a proposal to adopt a Modification to the Development Program for Development District No. 1, to establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 ( "TIF DistrictNo. 14") and adopt a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan ") therefor. TIF District No. 1-4 will be a redevelopment tax increment financing district which has a maximum life of 26 years of tax increment (or a shorter period as determined by the City Council). On April 30, 2004, a letter and TIF Plan for proposed TIF District No. 1-4 were sent from this office. Due to a lack of a quorum, the public hearing was not held on June 1, 2004. Since that time, the size of the area involved has changed. Additional property owners from the Hughs and Westview Industrial Parks have indicated that they would like to be included in TIF District No. 14. Tax increments collected from TIF District No. 14 will enable the City of Andover to facilitate the demolition of several substandard buildings. New buildings will be constructed that will serve primarily as office and warehouse facilities for service businesses, within the City of Andover. The location of TIF District No. 14 can be seen on the maps as found in the enclosed TIF Plan. • As required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 and 4, we hereby forward a draft of the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-4. Please note that the TIF Plan is in draft form for distribution to the County and the School District. The TIF Plan contains the estimated fiscal and economic implications of the proposed TIF District. The EDA or City may make changes to this draft document prior to the public hearing, however the authorized costs will not increase. We would like to solicit your continents and offer to meet with you at your convenience, if you so desire. in addition, we invite you to attend the public hearing to be held by the City Council at City Hall on August 17, 2004, beginning at approximately 7:00 P.M. or to direct any comments or questions that you may have to Jim Dickinson (City of Andover) at 763 - 755 -5100, or to me at 657- 697 -8504. Thank you for your consideration in reviewing the enclosed proposal. Sincerely, EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Shelly Eldridge Financial Advisor Acting for and on behalf of the City of Andover, Minnesota Enc. cc: Jim Dickinson, City of Andover. Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan, P.A. Equal Opportunity Employer LEADERS I N PUBLIC F I N A N C E Charter Member of the National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 651.697.8500 fax 651.697.8555 www.ehiers- inc.com —3 — . TABLE OF CONTENTS • (for reference purposes only) SECTION I -MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 ..... ............................... 1 -1 Foreword.............................. ............................... 1 -1 SECTION II - TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING District NO. 1 -4 ........................... 2 -1 Subsection 2 -1. Foreword ............... ............................... 2 -1 Subsection 2 -2. Statutory Authority ........ ............................... 2 -1 Subsection 2 -3. Statement of Objectives .... ............................... 2 -1 Subsection 2 -4. Development Program Overview ............................ 2 -1 Subsection 2 -5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired . 2 -2 Subsection 2 -6. Classification of the District . ............................... 2 -2 Subsection 2 -7. Duration of the District ..... ............................... 2-4 Subsection 2 -8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity Value /Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ............... 2 -4 Subsection 2 -9. Sources of Revenue /Bonded Indebtedness .................... 2 -5 Subsection 2 -10. Uses of Funds ........... ............................... 2 -6 Subsection 2 -11. State Tax Increment Financing Aid (Local Contribution) ........... 2 -7 Subsection 2 -12. Fiscal Disparities Election ... ............................... 2 -7 Subsection 2 -13. Business Subsidies ....... ............................... 2 -7 Subsection 2 -14. County Road Costs ....... ............................... 2 -8 Subsection 2 -15. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ................. 2 -9 • Subsection 2 -16. Subsection 2 -17. Supporting Documentation .. ............................... Definition of Tax Increment Revenues ........................ 2 -9 2 -9 Subsection 2 -18. Modifications to the District . ............................... 2 -10 Subsection 2 -19. Administrative Expenses .. ............................... 2 -10 Subsection 2 -20. Limitation of Increment .... ............................... 2 -11 Subsection 2 -21. Use of Tax Increment ..... ............................... 2 -12 Subsection 2 -22. Excess Increments ....... ............................... 2 -13 Subsection 2 -23. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer .............. 2 -13 Subsection 2 -24. Assessment Agreements .. ............................... 2 -13 Subsection 2 -25. Administration of the District ............................... 2 -13 Subsection 2 -26. Annual Disclosure Requirements ........................... 2 -14 Subsection 2 -27. Reasonable Expectations .. ............................... 2 -14 Subsection 2 -28. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment ................ 2 -14 Subsection 2 -29. Summary .............. ............................... 2 -15 APPENDIX A PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..... ............................... A -1 APPENDIX B MAPS OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE DISTRICT ..... B -1 APPENDIX C DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DISTRICT .. C-1 APPENDIX D ESTIMATED CASH FLOW FOR THE DISTRICT ................... D -1 APPENDIX E MINNESOTA BUSINESS ASSISTANCE FORM .................... E -1 • APPENDIX F REDEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DISTRICT ......... F -1 APPENDIX G BUT /FOR QUALIFICATIONS ... ............................... G -1 —5 SECTION H - TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING District NO. 1 -4 • Subsection 2 -1. Foreword The Andover Economic Development Authority (the "EDA "), the City of Andover (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 ( "the District "), a redevelopment tax increment financing district, located in Development District No. 1. Subsection 2 -2. Statutory Authority Within the City, there exists areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the EDA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ('M.S.'), Sections 469.090 to 469.1082, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act "), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Development Program for Development District No. 1. Subsection 2 -3. Statement of Objectives The District currently consists of twenty one parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights -of -way. The District is being created to facilitate the renovation and demolition of substandard buildings within the district. New buildings will be constructed where the buildings will be demolished. Contracts for this have not been entered into at the time of preparation of this TIF Plan, but development is likely to begin in the Spring /Summer of 2005. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Development Program for Development District No. 1. The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Development Program and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of Development District No. 1 and the District. Subsection 2 -4. Development Program Overview 1. Property to be Acquired -Selected property located within the District maybe acquired by the EDA or City and is further described in this TIF Plan. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the EDA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The EDA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, • construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public streets work within the District. Andover Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.4 2 -1 —7— (b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements ora combination ofdeficiencies inessential utilities and facilities, light and • ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition ofinteriorpartitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. (c) Abuildingisnotstructurallysubstandardifitisincompliancewiththebuildingcodeapplicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost ofplumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or other similar reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without an interior inspection of the property, but need not have an independent, expert appraisal prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality f nds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard. (d) A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building for purposes of the finding under paragraph (a) if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the district with the county auditor; (2) the substandard building was demolished or removed by the authority or the demolition or removal was financed by the authority or was done by a developer under a development agreement with the authority; (3) the authority found by resolution before the demolition or removal that the parcel was occupied by a structurally substandard building and that after demolition and clearance the authority intended to include the parcel within a district; and (4) ,upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district, the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted as provided by § 469.177, subdivision ],paragraph (fl. (e) For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. (fl For districts consisting of two or more noncontiguous areas, each area must qualms as a redevelopment district underparagraph (a) to be included in the district, and the entire area of the district must satisfy paragraph (a). In meeting the statutory criteria the EDA and City rely on the following facts and findings: • ❑ The District is a redevelopment district consisting of 21 parcels. ❑ An inventory shows that parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area in the District are Andover Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 2 -3 .7 Project Estimated Tax Capacity upon Completion (PTC) $400,000 • Original Estimated Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) $71 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) $328,688 Original Local Tax Rate 91.352% Pay 2004 Estimated Annual Tax Increment(CTC x Local Tax Rate) $300,263 Percent Retained by the EDA 100% Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the EDA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City is reviewing the area to be included in the District to determine if any building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the City. Subsection 2 -9. Sources of Revenue /Bonded Indebtedness Public improvement costs, acquisition, demolition, utilities, parking facilities, streets and sidewalks, and site preparation costs and other costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The EDA or City reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally ap- plicable to the EDA or City and the TIF Plan, including, but not limited to, special assessments, general property taxes, state aid for road maintenance and construction, proceeds from the sale of land, other contributions from the developer and investment income, to pay for the estimated public costs. The EDA or City reserves the right to incur bonded indebtedness or other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the project will be financed by a pay -as- you -go note. Additional indebtedness may be required to finance other authorized activities. The total principal amount of bonded indebtedness, including a general obligation (GO) TIF bond, or other indebtedness related to the use of tax increment financing will not exceed $6,050,000 without a modification to the TIF Plan pursuant to applicable statutory requirements. It is estimated that $6,050,000 in interfund loans is authorized to be financed with tax increment revenues. It is estimated that $6,050,000 in transfers is authorized to be financed with tax increment revenues. It is estimated that $6,050,000 in indebtedness debt proceeds is authorized to be financed with tax increment revenues. This provision does not obligate the EDA or City to incur debt. The EDA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The EDA or City may also finance the activities to be undertaken pursuant to the TIF Plan through loans from funds of the EDA or City or to reimburse the developer on a "pay -as- you -go" basis for eligible costs paid for by a developer. The estimated sources of funds for the District are contained in the table on the following page. u Andover Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.4 2 -5 without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M. S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2, no more than 25 percent of the tax increment paid by property within the District will be spent on activities related to development or redevelopment outside of the District but within the boundaries of Development District No. 1, (including administrative costs, which are considered to be spent outside of the District) subject to the limitations as described in this TIF Plan. Subsection 2 -11. State Tax Increment Financing Aid (Local Contribution) M.S., Section 273.1399 (LGA/HACA penalty) was repealed by the 2001 Legislature and does not apply to the District. Subsection 2 -12. Fiscal Disparities Election Pursuant toM.S, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the EDA or City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal disparities. If the calculations pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause a, (outside the District) are followed, the following method of computation shall apply: (I) The original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscal disparity provisions of Chapter 276.4 or 473F. Where the original net tax capacity is equal to or greater than the current net tax capacity, there is no captured net tax capacity and no tax increment determination. Where the original net tax capacity is less than the current net tax capacity, the difference between the original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity is the captured net tax capacity. This amount less any portion thereof which the authority has designated, in its tax increment f:nancingplan, to share with the local taxing districts is the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority. (2) The county auditorshall exclude the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority from the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The local tax rates so determined are to be extended against the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority as well as the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts. The tax generated by the extension of the lesser of (A) the local taxing district tax rates or (B) the original local tax rate to the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority is the tax increment of the authority. The EDA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause a (outside the District). According to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3: (c) The method of computation of tax increment applied to a district pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) shall remain the same for the duration of the district, except that the governing body may elect to change its election from the method of computation in paragraph (a) to the method in paragraph (b). Subsection 2 -13. Business Subsidies Pursuant to M.S. Sections 1161.993, Subd. 3, the following forms of financial assistance are not considered a business subsidy: (1) A business subsidy of less than $25,000; (2) Assistance that is generally available to all businesses or to a general class of similar businesses, Andover Econardc Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 2 -7 -13- Subsection 2 -15. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions • The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the EDA or City has determined that such development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the actual 2003/Pay 2004 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on actual Pay 2004 figures. The District will be certified under the actual 2004/Pay 2005 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Subsection 2 -16. Supporting Documentation Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd 1, clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175 Subd 3, clause (2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the TIF district. Following is a list of reports and studies on file at the City that support the Authority's findings: • SEH report • TIF request from Developer and Property Owners Subsection 2 -17. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing district include all of the following potential revenue sources: Andover Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 2 -9 6 IMPACT ON TAX BASE 2003/2004 Estimated Captured Total Net Tax Capacity (CTC) Percent of CTC Tax Capacity Upon Com lu etion to Entity Total Anoka County 200,134,542 328,688 0.1642% City of Andover 18,604,494 328,688 1.7667% Anoka- Hennepin ISD No. 11 104,342,258 328,688 0.3150% IMPACT ON TAX RATES 2003/2004 Percent Potential Extension Rates of Total CTC Taxes Anoka County 0.352210 38.56% 328,688 115,767 City of Andover 0.316030 34.59% 328,688 103 Anoka- Hennepin ISD No. 11 0.210500 23.04% 328,688 69,189 Other (Met, Rail, Radio) 0.034780 3.81% 328,688 11,432 Total 0.913520 100.00% 300,263 The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the actual 2003/Pay 2004 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on actual Pay 2004 figures. The District will be certified under the actual 2004/Pay 2005 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Subsection 2 -16. Supporting Documentation Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd 1, clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175 Subd 3, clause (2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the TIF district. Following is a list of reports and studies on file at the City that support the Authority's findings: • SEH report • TIF request from Developer and Property Owners Subsection 2 -17. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing district include all of the following potential revenue sources: Andover Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 2 -9 6 project; or 4. Amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178; or 5. Amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clauses (1) to (3). For districts for which the request for certification were made before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, 1982, administrative expenses also include amounts paid for services provided bybond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 3, tax increment may be used to pay any authorized and documented administrative expenses for the District up to but not to exceed 10 percent of the total estimated tax increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or the total tax increments, as defined by M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, clause (1), from the District, whichever is less. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the County's actual administrative expenses incurred in connection with the District. The county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the year following the year the expenses were incurred. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469. 177, Subd. 11, the County Treasurer shall deduct an amount (currently .36 percent) of any increment distributed to the EDA or City and the County Treasurer shall pay the amount deducted to the State Treasurer for deposit in the state general fund to be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting of tax increment financing information and the cost of examining and auditing authorities' use of tax increment financing. This amount may be adjusted annually by the Commissioner of Revenue. • Subsection 2 - 20. Limitation of Increment Pursuant to M.S, Section 469.176, Subd. la, no tax increment shall be paid to the EDA or City for the District after three (3) years from the date of certification of the Original Net Tax Capacity value of the taxable property in the District by the County Auditor unless within the three (3) year period: (1) Bonds have been issued in aid ofthe project containing the District pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178, or any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to M.S, Sections 469.152 to 469.165, or (2) The EDA or City has acquired property within the District, or (3) The EDA or City has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within the District. The bonds must be issued, or the EDA or City must acquire property or construct or cause public improvements to be constructed by approximately June, 2007 and report such actions to the County Auditor. The tax increment pledged to the payment of bonds and interest thereon may be discharged and the District may be terminated if sufficient funds have been irrevocably deposited in the debt service fund or other escrow account held in trust for all outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the bonds at maturity or redemption date. i Andover Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 2 -11 _/7� amount as specified in a developer's agreement to reimburse the costs of land acquisition, public improvements, demolition and relocation, site preparation, and administration. Remaining increment funds will be used for EDA or City administration (up to 10 percent) and the costs of public improvement activities outside the District. Subsection 2 -22. Excess Increments Excess increments, as defined in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. Z, shall be used only to do one or more of the following: 1. Prepay any outstanding bonds; 2. Discharge the pledge of tax increment for any outstanding bonds; 3. Pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of any outstanding bonds; or 4. Return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their local tax rates. In addition, the EDA or City may, subject to the limitations set forth herein, choose to modify the TIF Plan in order to finance additional public costs in Development District No. 1 or the District. Subsection 2 -23. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer The EDA or City will review any proposal for private development to determine its conformance with the Development Program and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the EDA or City to demonstrate the conformance of the development with City plans and ordinances. The EDA or City may also use the Agreements to address other issues related to the development. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 5, no more than 25 percent, by acreage, of the property to be acquired in the District as set forth in the TT Plan shall at any time be owned by the EDA or City as a result of acquisition with the proceeds of bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178 to which tax increments from property acquired is pledged, unless prior to acquisition in excess of 25 percent of the acreage, the EDA or City concluded an agreement for the development or redevelopment of the property acquired and which provides recourse for the EDA or City should the development or redevelopment not be completed. Subsection 2 -24. Assessment Agreements Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.177, Subd. 8, the EDA or City may enter into a written assessment agreement in recordable form with the developer of property within the District which establishes a minimum market value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears, in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the County Assessor shall also certify the minimum market value agreement. Subsection 2 -25. Administration of the District i Administration of the District will be handled by the City Administrator. Andover Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.4 2 -13 /9— u 0 u permitted under said five year rule must be used only to pay previously committed expenditures or credit enhanced bonds as more fully set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 5. 4. Redevelopment District At least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of redevelopment and renewal andrenovation districts underM .S., Section 469.176Subd. 4j. Thesecosts include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacentparcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of the land, the removal. of hazardous substances or remediation necessary for development of the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated administrative expenses of the EDA or City, including the cost of preparation of the development action response plan, may be included in the qualifying costs. Subsection 2 -29. Summary The EDA is establishing the District to preserve and enhance the tax base, redevelop substandard areas, and provide employment opportunities in the City. The TIF Plan for the District was prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113, telephone (651) 697 -8500. Andover Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 2 -15 -2/- i MAPS OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE DISTRICT 0 u APPENDIX B-1 -23 WO TIF District 1-4 0 Economic Development Authority s 0 0 0 .............. ........................... I .......................................... ..................................................................... ............................................... 16-32-24-23-0005 ::3160162 °d Ln UNPLATTED GROW TWP THE F M Marketing & W 250 FT OF THE S 233 FT OF Leasing, Inc. THE N 1984.99 FT OF THE W1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 16-32-24 ANOKA CNTY, MN .......................................... .......................................... ..................................................................... ............................................... 16-32-24-23-0001 3121161sAve €UNPLATTED CITY OF:: Joseph and Rita Kowal :ANDOVER THAT PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF NWIA OF SEC: 16-32-24 DESC AS FOL-COM:: ON THE SE CORNER OF THE SWI/40FNWI/40FSEC16-32-: 24-TH WLY ON S LINE OF SAID 1/4 A DIST OF 461 FT TO THE ACTUAL POINT 0 .......................................... ..................... ................... ..................................................................... ............................................... 16-32-24-23-0016 3055 162a Ln Lots 8 and 9, Block 1, Hughes James andKari Larson Industrial Park .......................................... .............................................................................................................................................................. 16-32-24-23-0021 NO ADDRESS Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, Hughes D J Properties Industrial Park APPENDIX C-2 —2-? — FREERS L ASSOCIATES INC Round Lake Blvd between 161st Ave and 162nd Lane 0 City of Andover District Redevelopment District # 1-4 Inflation Rate - Every Year 0.0000% Pay -As- You -Go Interest Rate: 5.7500% Note Issued Date (Present Value Date): 01- Aug-04 Local Tax Rate - Maximum (51011 L) 91.352% Pay 2004 Year District was certified Pay 2004 Assumes First Tax Increment For District 2006 Years of Tax Increment 26 Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2032 Fiscal Disparities Ratio 0.321645 Pay 2004 Fiscal Disparities Metro Wide Tax Rate 137.107% Pay 2004 Local Tax Rate - Current 91.352% Pay 2004 State Wide Property Tax Rate (Used for 400,000 total taxes) 54.1090% Pay 2004 \_ J Market Value Tax Rate (used for total taxes) 0.14343% Pay 2004 Commercial Industrial Class Rate 1.5 % -2.0% Pay 2003 First 150,000 1.50% Over 150,000 2.00% * Reflects base value at final use classification Total Market Class Tax Original Land Building Total Class Tax Date PID Mkt Value Mkt Value Mkt Value Rate Capacity Payable 21 Parcels - See List 1,925,000 2,304,720 4,229,720 1.5 % /2% 71,312 2004 2004 2006 Totals 1,925,000 2,304,720 4,229 71,312 * Reflects base value at final use classification — LY -- Total Market Class Tax Year Pay Taxes Value Rate Capacity Constr Year edeveloped Properties 20,000,000 2.00% 400,000 2004 2006 2004 2006 2004 2006 TOTAL 0 20,000,000 400,000 7/16/2004 Estimates Only Fiscal Implicationruns.xls — LY -- EHLERS 16 ASSOCIATES INC 9 0 CITY OF ANDOVER NOTES: 1. State Auditor payment is based upon 1st half, pay 2DO2 actual and may change over tern of district. 2. Assumes redevelopment is completed in 2004, assessed in 2005 and first increment is paid in 2006. If increment received in 2005, district will be shortened by one year. 3. Amount of increment will vary depending upon market value, tax rates, class rates, construction schedule and inflation on Market Value. 4. Inflation on tax rates cannot be captured. 5. 71F does not capture state wide property taxes or market value property taxes. 7/1612004 FFstimates Only Fiscal Impliw6onrunsxis 3/- Base Total Captured Semi - Annual State Admin. Semi - Annual Cumul. PAYMENT DATE PERIOD BEGINNIN Tax Tax Tax Gross Tax Auditor at Net Tax Net Tax PERIOD ENDING Yrs. Mth. Yr. Capacity Capacity Capacity Increment 0.36% 10.00% Increment Increment Yrs. Mth. Yr. 0.0 02 -01 2004 71,312 71,312 0.0 0"1 2004 0.0 08 -01 2004 71,312 71,312 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 02 -01 2DO5 0.0 02 -01 2005 71,312 71,312 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 08 -01 2005 0.0 08 -01 2005 71,312 71,312 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 02 -01 2006 0.0 02 -01 2006 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 134,632 0.5 08 -01 2006 0.5 08 -01 2006 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 269,264 1.0 D2 -01 2007 1.0 02 -01 2007 71,312 400,000 328,668 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 403,896 1.5 08-01 2007 1.5 08 -01 2007 71,312 400,000 328,668 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 538,528 2.0 02 -01 2008 2.0 02 -01 2006 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 673,16D 2.5 08 -01 2008 2.5 08 -01 2008 71,312 400,000 328,668 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 807,792 3.0 02 -01 2009 3.0 02 -01 2009 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 942,424 3.5 08 -01 2009 3.5 08 -01 2009 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 1,077,056 4.0 02 -01 2010 4.0 02 -01 2010 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 1,211,688 4.5 08 -01 2010 4.5 08 -01 2010 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 1,346,320 5.0 02 -01 2011 5.0 02 -01 2011 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 1,480,951 5.5 08-01 2011 5.5 08 -01 2011 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 1,615,583 6.0 02 -01 2012 6.0 02 -01 2012 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 1,750,215 6.5 0"l 2012 6.5 08 -01 2012 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 1,884,847 7.0 02 -01 2D13 7.0 02 -01 2013 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 2,019,479 7.5 08 -01 2D13 7.5 08 -01 2013 71,312 400,000 328,686 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 2,154,111 8.0 02 -01 2014 8.0 02 -01 2014 71,312 400,000 328,688 15D,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 2,288,743 8.5 08 -01 2014 8.5 08 -01 2014 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (54D) (14,959) 134,632 2,423,375 9.0 02 -01 2015 9.0 02 -01 2015 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 2,558,007 9.5 D8 -01 2015 9.5 08 -01 2015 71,312 400,000 326,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 2,692,639 10.0 D2 -01 2016 10.0 02 -01 2016 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 2,827,271 10.5 08 -01 2016 10.5 08 -01 2016 71,312 400,000 328,686 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 2,961,903 11.0 02-01 2017 11.0 02 -01 2017 71,312 400,000 326,686 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 3,096,535 11.5 08 -01 2017 11.5 08 -01 2017 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 3,231,167 12.D 02 -01 2018 12.0 02 -01 2018 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 3,365,799 12.5 08 -01 2018 12.5 08 -01 2018 71,312 400,000 326,686 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 3,500,431 13.0 02 -01 2019 13.0 02 -01 2019 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 3,635,D63 13.5 08 -01 2019 13.5 08 -01 2019 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 3,769,695 14.0 02 -01 2020 14.0 02 -01 2020 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 3,904,327 14.5 08-01 2020 14.5 08 -01 2020 71,312 400,000 328,686 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 4,038,959 15.0 02 -01 2021 15.0 02 -01 2D21 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 4,173,591 15.5 OB -01 2021 15.5 08 -01 2D21 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 4,308,222 16.0 02 -01 2022 16.0 D2 -01 2022 71,312 400,000 326,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 4,442,854 16.5 08 -01 2022 16.5 08 -01 2022 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 4,577,486 17.0 02-D1 2023 17.0 02 -01 2023 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 4,712,118 17.5 08 -01 2023 17.5 08 -01 2023 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 4,846,750 18.0 02 -01 2024 18.0 02 -01 2024 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 4,981,362 18.5 08 -01 2024 18.5 08 -01 2024 71,312 400,D00 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 5,116,014 19.0 02 -01 2025 19.0 02 -01 2025 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 5,250,646 19.5 08 -01 2025 19.5 08 -01 2025 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 5,385,278 20.0 02 -01 2026 20.0 02 -01 2026 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (54D) (14,959) 134,632 5,519,91D 20.5 08 -01 2026 20.5 08-01 2026 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 5,654,542 21.0 02 -01 2027 21.0 02 -01 2027 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 5,789,174 21.5 08-01 2027 21.5 08 -01 2027 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 5,923,806 22.0 02 -01 2028 22.0 02 -01 2028 71,312 400,000 328,668 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 6,058,438 22.5 OB -01 2025 22.5 08-01 2028 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 6,193,070 23.0 02 -01 2029 23.0 02 -01 2029 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 6,327,702 23.5 08 -01 2029 23.5 08 -01 2029 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 6,462,334 24.0 02 -01 2030 24.0 02 -01 2030 71,312 400,000 328,668 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 6,596,966 24.5 08 -01 2030 24.5 08-01 2030 71,312 400,000 328,668 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 6,731,598 25.0 02 -01 2031 25.0 02 -01 2031 71,312 400,000 328,688 150,132 (540) (14,959) 134,632 6,666,230 25.5 08 -01 2031 25.5 08-01 2031 71 400 328 150,132 540 (14,959) 134 7,000,861 1 26.0 02 -01 2032 Totals 7,806,840 28105 ) (777,873). 7,000,861 4,025,992 13 312 (368,449 NOTES: 1. State Auditor payment is based upon 1st half, pay 2DO2 actual and may change over tern of district. 2. Assumes redevelopment is completed in 2004, assessed in 2005 and first increment is paid in 2006. If increment received in 2005, district will be shortened by one year. 3. Amount of increment will vary depending upon market value, tax rates, class rates, construction schedule and inflation on Market Value. 4. Inflation on tax rates cannot be captured. 5. 71F does not capture state wide property taxes or market value property taxes. 7/1612004 FFstimates Only Fiscal Impliw6onrunsxis 3/- APPENDIX F • REDEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DISTRICT The City's engineering firm, SEH is currently in the process of accumulating the required data to substantiate the coverage requirements and determine that the level of blight is sufficient for qualification under the law. Prior to the public hearing, SEH will provide a written report outlining their fmdings. APPENDIX F -1 033- 1 A NDOVE A T Y O F 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Chris Vrchota, Planning Intern V Courtney Bednarz, City PlanneA SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit (04 -06) to allow institutional sign area of up to 100 square feet for Andover Christian Church located at 16045 Nightingale Street NW. DATE: August 10, 2004 INTRODUCTION The Andover Christian Church is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow an institutional sign in a residential district with an aggregate square footage exceeding thirty-two (32) square feet. DISCUSSION Applicable Ordinances Chapter 12 -14 -9 G of the Andover City Code allows the following with a Conditional Use Permit: Institutional signs in residential districts with an aggregate square footage exceeding thirty - two (32) square feet and/or more than one sign per lot frontage, provided: (1) The sign is located ten feet (10') from any property line. (2) The aggregate square footage of sign space shall not exceed one hundred (100) square feet. (3) The sign shall be of the following styles: combination, freestanding, pedestal, roof or wall. (4) No more than one sign shall be allowed per lot frontage unless approved by city council. (5) The sign shall be located at least one hundred thirty feet (130') from any residential structure. Chapter 12 -5 -6 B of the Andover City Code provides the following criteria for the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit: 1. In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the planning and zoning commission and: a. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. b. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. c. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the comprehensive plan. • CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONALUSE PERMIT REQUEST OF ANDOVER CHRISTIAN CHURCH FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16045 NIGHTINGALE ST. NW, (PIN 15- 32 -24 -42 -0006) LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: The North 693.00 feet of the West 402.00 feet as measured along the West and North lines respectively, of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except the South 30.0 feet thereof, as measured at right angles to the South line thereof. Also Except Parcel 21, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT No. 2, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Also Except Parcel 33, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT No. 20, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying South of the Right -of -Way line of County State Aid Highway No. 20, per ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT No. 20, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, and lying East of the West 402.00 feet thereof, as measured along the North line thereof, and lying Northwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the North 663.00 feet of the West 402.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter as measured along the West and North lines thereof, thence Northeasterly in a straight line, to a point on the South Right -of -Way line of said County State Aid Highway No. 20, distant 300.00 feet Westerly of the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, and to the point of termination of the line being described. WHEREAS, Andover Christian Church has requested a Conditional Use Permit for institutional signage in a residential district with an aggregate square footage exceeding thirty -two (32) square feet and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of City Code; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of • the Conditional Use Permit request; f W Z Affm ill 3 N �� O C *' u .tz N l6 E E F= CL a H cn w a r • -2— co a w ,` Cc m p O e, Q H T W e W '� W W } d z O w Q w w d < a > J w w Q < U m y m c N p L" (n a o — a ❑❑ m �� 0 16d m 3 co a o C V N.O a a U O N O t N U > O N L a ID p C � O C c Co ry yE j 1 T N N � V 3 3 i N O N N O C O E E w E i m •- Qd w m Cc d L «. - -- n v d 'o �O o c da I i w N a y (0 O_ i E (0 a 3 V N g O -. m a�i E -- - —_. -- -- .... -_ .._.—_ _....__ IS 9WONUgN. I Co O O < T N . :3 I a� .. v o Q o0 C L F 14111.gif (GIF Image, 609x755 pixels) i file: ///C:/ Documents% 20and% 20Settings /Owner/Local %20Settings... y p G <fpFlYrrs<xf a� SFci:w;tt. _4j_ysrtfur°aE ii-i3# Ffstzrf r #.�tr2�rs �. 8' M. 44 ANNOUNCER XL CABINET SIZE &XIO' ( }{Z(£it�S<Lt. t'JC',S'(Li:SI ... aC't YYi� 98H: Y3ckaCCwi 3attiYai4ss k Si?%, Y3f4 M-M A4u tN'{i.n;4!A'b t �c7t4' kki.Y'ktkAG NKi #. b 1Y#k t't'SR #st #3t'iNalYcK tl.. rNUAWD t6 'r'S. a3(CtiISL� WO NOT K.KAfATE r,nmw 4:v va wl� 4xuw axmaa, s K VVIYU Ox. Ma 11 f #4$1411 5, 1444 04o&v + W** Wr VW tt.W 4w iow*Mv.w 941twus. �+" XAkt e:,re ae �.'arptusrr#risx #111"" PKOEoOS -EL � vaY avc:i4ut. iv ttr� �tiaer»�xt. f- F{ff(J �3?•.��T cd ibwasf Of 1 7119/2004 3:49 PM 5 C A IT Y O F ND OV . 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner SUBJECT: Variance (04 -06) to vary from the minimum lot size requirements of City Code 5 -1A for sheltering horses on property located at 17536 Quay Street NW. DATE: August 10, 2004 INTRODUCTION The applicant did not provide information in time for this item to be included in the packet. This item will not be reviewed at the August 10, 2004 meeting. DISCUSSION None. ACTION REQUESTED None Re ectfully mi ed, ui�C y arz r r C I T Y O F ND O� 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners n FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Residential Sketch Plan for an urban residential development located at 15941 Hanson Boulevard NW. DATE: August 10, 2004 INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission is asked to review a residential sketch plan for an urban development containing nine lots. Conformance with local and Regional Plans The proposed sketch plan is consistent with the Andover Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The property is designated Transitional Residential (TR). This designation indicates the property will transition from rural to urban with the extension of utilities to the property. The property is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and lies within the current growth stage (2000 -2005) in the city's sewer expansion plan. Municipal utilities can be extended to serve the entire development. The zoning of the property is Single Family Rural Residential, R -1. A rezoning to Single Family Urban Residential, R -4, will be necessary to allow the project to move forward. DISCUSSION The subject property is approximately 4.8 acres in size. A ghost sketch of the property was prepared with the Shady Oak Cove preliminary plat. This sketch showed eight lots with one lot containing the existing house. The applicant has submitted a sketch plan also containing eight lots. This sketch shortens the length of the street extension into the subject property and utilizes a larger cul -de -sac with a landscaped center island. This design results in increased front yard sizes and also increases the depth of lots at the south end of the cul -de -sac. Lots Each of the proposed lots will exceed the R -4 minimum lot area requirement of 11,400 square feet as indicated on the sketch plan. Each of the lots will meet or exceed the R -4 minimum lot width and depth requirements. The existing house will be located on one of the lots. Landscaped Cul -De -Sac Island Landscaped islands can be attractive addition to a neighborhood. Functionality and long tem maintenance also need to be ensured in,the design. The design will need to ensure adequate turning radius for emergency vehicles and plows. Long term maintenance will also need to be provided by assigning this responsibility to a homeowners association. The Public Works Urban Residential Sketch Plan 161 ST AVE 11 0 N W E S C I T Y O F NDOVE Project Location Map Layout Name: LOCATION MAP LAYOUT Project Location: H:\ GISDATA \PIANNING\PROJECTS\NEWCPSES.APR Date Printed: 08 /03/2004 - 02:37:16 PM .345.1 by AS \ R- � 1 � �`"s °�'..o,.•.. 0. �1 n .i3. 5 SF. 1.41 � t3042.8 O —rh- -� - 1I b 1 ( FILL I I 1 $ R-sm <•� c i 1►etland i 0 -47 An :wl t o I Z&4 ) �'fA I 1 1 %/ 1 l j I eo • �r ' 1U I 23.240 S.F. 1 ' W AM a x'/ 422 S.F. ' S I m ACV at 105 I I ' • 3 ( ! 1) 1 11u1�r� . 286.8 1 _ Tr 231 10.0 86 I 07 1 I 1 45' I \ % rns 320.0 I 1 I ;(' s..,u s,. sun 1 .t 9 \acaai , t R-10 I d SA s..s, C � S- I i I 1 9 FOR IENP. = W. j 1 ! I I , I ; S � .a . 1 s. inert /'m.' •\. i ` l --k ' , 1 dI.6 • —.� — —1 t 1 —�— L , S II •�� i � f ', i I I tl 11 L —� -- I �- -- ,- -- - -- -- I I II � 1 j \Ii ~