Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/26/020 0 Lim CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda November 26, 2002 Andover City Hall Council Chambers 7.00 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes - November 12, 2002 3. PUBLIC HEARING Preliminary Plat of a single family rural residential development to be known as North Lake Ridge for Fields Development Company on property located southwest of the intersection of Round Lake Boulevard and 161" Avenue NW (CSAH 20). 4. PUBLIC HEARING Lot Split (02 -11) to create a rural residential property for existing house at 15212 Nightingale Street NW. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Rezoning (02 -04) to change the zoning designation from R -1 Single Family Rural Residential to R-4 Single Family Urban Residential north of Woodland Estates 2 nd Addition for Woodland Development. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat of a single family residential development to be known as Woodland Estates 4 Addition for Woodland Development on property located north of Woodland Estates Second Addition. 7. PUBLIC HEARING Special Use Permit (02 -12) for an Area Identification Sign for Woodland Estates 4' Addition. 8. PUBLIC HEARING Rezoning (02 -05) to change the zoning designation from R -1 Single Family Rural Residential to R-4 Single Family Urban Residential for Shady Oak Cove on property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and 161 Avenue NW (CSAH 20). 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat of a single family residential development to be known as Shady Oak Cove for Penta Management Group on property located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and 161 Avenue NW (CSAH 20). Page 1 of 2 \ • Residential for Constance Corners on property located at 16034 Crosstown Boulevard NW. 10. PUBLIC HEARING Rezoning (02 -06) to change the zoning designation from R -1 Single Family Rural Residential to R -4 Single Family Urban property located at 16034 Crosstown Boulevard NW. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat of a single family residential development to be known as Constance Corners for Brueggeman Homes on 12. PUBLIC HEARING Special Use Permit (02 -13) for an Area Identification Sign for Constance Corners on property located at 16034 Crosstown Boulevard NW. 13. Adjournment • -------- Courtney Bednarz, City Planner ,PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 2002 ' '" 'I ' " I I. _ , . _ _, ~_, : :. _ ' _ _ _ _ . . The Regular Bi-rtIonthlyMeeting of the Andover Planning, and ZOning Commission was , called to order by Acting Chairperson Dean Daninger oriNovember 12,2002,7:00 p.m.; , at the Andover C~ty Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota, ",' , ' : I i Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 2 . Crosstown Drive in similar Business zones. This will not have a negative impact on the property values or scenic views of the surrounding area. Commissioner Kirchoff asked what types of businesses would go into the building. Mr. McKay stated the developer did not have any idea what would go in there but they are looking at offices. Motion by Kirchoff, seconded by Larsen, to open the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Ms. Shirley Kline, 13761 Northwood Dr. NW asked if the property goes commercial, the land next to this would like to go commercial in the next few years, could this be done. Mr. McKay stated the owner would need to file all the paperwork and go through the same process, but they have every right to do this. Mr. Bednarz stated that there is a minimum site size requirements for commercial districts and in this case, for limited business, it is 150 by 150 depth and width and he is not sure they have it there. Ms. Kline stated she thought he had enough because he owns more than one lot. Mr. Bednarz stated that if that is the case, he might be able to combine the properties but it would need to be looked at closer to determine. Motion by Falk, seconded by Larsen, to close the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. Motion • carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Motion by Falk, seconded by Kirchoff, to recommend to the City Council approval of Resolution No. , approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment (02 -04) to Change the Land Use Designation from Urban Residential Low Density (URL) to Limited Commercial (LC) on Property Located at 13730 Crosstown Drive NW For Pinewski Builders. Motion carried on a 3 -ayes, 1 -nay (Larsen), 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the December 3, 2002 City Council meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING (02 -04) TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY URBANRESIDENT1AL (R -4) TO LIMITED BUSINESS (LB) ON PR OPER TY L 0 CA TED AT 13 73 0 CROSSTOWN DRIVE NW FOR PINE WSKI BUILDERS. Mr. McKay explained that the applicant is requesting that the property be rezoned from Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) to Limited Business (LB) to allow a new professional office building adjacent to the Molly professional building. The external materials change would allow a proposal to incorporate the two buildings into one site with integrated parking. The color, style, and stone of both buildings would be similar. 0 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 3 • Mr. McKay stated as with all rezonings, one of the two following findings must be made to justify the rezoning: 1. The original zoning/land use was in error. 2. The character of the area or times and conditions have changed to such an extent to warrant the Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Amendment. In this case the character of the area has changed through the installation of municipal utilities, increased traffic along Bunker and Crosstown and resulting commercial development near the intersection. Other elements to be taken into consideration are: 1) The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. 2) Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and lands. 3) The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. 4) The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. There are already a number of businesses located nearby in similar Limited Business zones. Since the subject property is located just off of Bunker Lake Boulevard, and • directly at Crosstown Drive, this is a location along major roads, which, would accommodate the amount of increased traffic and the parking demands. These issues will be addressed during the commercial site plan process. This will not have a negative impact on the property values or scenic views of the surrounding area. The rezoning must be contingent upon a change to the Comprehensive Plan from URL to Limited Commercial. Motion by Falk, seconded by Kirchoff, to open the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 1 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Mr. Bednarz stated they have received a letter in opposition to this. Mr. Bednarz summarized the letter. Motion by Larsen, seconded by Kirchoff, to close the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 1 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Commissioner Falk asked if the applicant has met with the residents regarding this land. Mr. Steve Pinewski, Pinewski Builders, stated the property owners talked with the neighbors prior to the application and everyone seemed to be in favor of this except for the neighbor to the north. He stated he has not personally talked to the neighbors. Mr. Bednarz stated that staff received a letter in opposition to the request. He • summarized the letter and noted that the Planning Commission received a copy as well. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 4 . Commissioner Kirchoff stated he was curious if there would be any opportunity in the back to soften the landscaping or putting up a fence. Mr. Pinewski stated they do not like the idea of a fence because of high maintenance. They were looking at putting in blue spruces. He stated the proposal would be to line the property lines with blue spruces, which makes a good buffer year round. Commissioner Kirchoff stated he thought this was an appropriate change. Motion by Kirchoff, seconded by Daninger, to recommend to the City Council approval of Resolution No. , approving the Rezoning (02 -04) to Change the Zoning Designation from Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) to Limited Business (LB) on Property Located at 13730 Crosstown Drive NW for Pinewski Builders. Motion carried on a 3 -ayes, 1 -nays (Larsen), 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the December 3, 2002 City Council meeting. VARL4NCE (02 -11) VARL4NCE TO ORDINANCE 8, SECTION 6.02 FOR SIDE SETBACK TO ALLOW ADDITION TO EXISTING HOUSE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2860135 AVENUE NW. . Mr. Bednarz explained that the applicant is seeking approval of a variance to reduce the side yard setback for a proposed addition to the existing house. Mr. Bednarz stated the applicant intends to finish the existing garage to add additional finished square footage to the existing house. A new garage with living space above would be added to the west side of the existing garage. The living space above the garage would be 1.5 feet below the 10 -foot side yard setback for houses. The addition would extend to 8.5 feet from the side property line. Mr. Bednarz stated staff researched previous variance applications and found that a number of variances to the side yard setback have been granted in the past. Typically these variances have been for decks, house additions or detached accessory buildings adjacent to streets on comer lots. Four variances have been granted for garage or house additions from interior property lines. Mr. John Olsen, 2860 135 Avenue NW presented the proposed addition to the existing house. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if the neighbors have objections to this. Mr. Olsen stated they did not have any objections. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 5 . Commissioner Larsen stated in the letter he indicated one neighbor would not object, what about the others. Mr. Olsen stated that the neighbor this addition would be closest to does not object. Motion by Larsen, seconded by Kirchoff, to recommend to the City Council approval of Resolution No. , approving the Variance (02 -11) Variance to Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 for Side Setback to Allow Addition to Existing House for Property Located at 2860 135 Avenue NW. Commissioner Kirchoff stated he saw this addition as a border between two houses and not as an infringement on the setback. He stated he thought this would be an asset to the neighborhood. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated in the Resolution, it should state 135 Avenue and not Lane. Mr. Bednarz stated this is true and would be noted and corrected. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the December 3, 2002 City Council meeting. • PUBLIC HEARING: RESIDENTL4L SKETCH PLAN FOR A TOWNHOUSE PROJECT FOR CREEKSIDE HOMES ON PROPER TY LOCA TED AT 14220 CROSSTOWNBOULEVARD NW. Mr. Bednarz explained that the Planning Commission is asked to review a sketch plan for a residential development containing 24 townhouses on an approximately 4 -acre property. The proposed development would require planned unit development review to provide alternative development standards. Mr. Bednarz discussed the criteria with the Planning Commission. Mr. Bednarz stated the City Council would need to determine if they would accept a medium density development on the subject property. Mr. Dave Harris, Creekside Homes stated they have had many different sketch plans for this project and they finally came up with a plan that would be marketable and address the issues that were raised by the neighborhood. He presented the proposed sketch plan to the Commission. Motion by Falk, seconded by Larsen, to open the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Mr. Joe Kabezinksi, 2351 Uplander Drive NW stated he had a memo from Mr. Bednarz • and he never received one of these, only one neighbor received this and he wanted to Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 6 S know why. He also stated that the property was owned by Mr. Windschitl and it was zoned as light commercial and he tried to get the property rezoned to build homes on the property and was denied, so how can Mr. Harris build townhomes. He stated with the new school in the area, there is already too much traffic in the area and if these townhomes are allowed to be built, the traffic will be unbearable and no one will be able to get out of the neighborhood. Mr. Bednarz stated the City sends out notices to residents within 350 feet of the property and the City also publishes the hearing notice in the Anoka Union and posts a sign at the site. Ms. Becky Joiner, 14194 Quinn Street NW stated her property abuts up to the property behind them and she took the time to go around the neighborhood to have people sign a petition. She stated the property is zoned low density and Mr. Harris is trying to put in 24 units and they would like to see the City only allow 16 units on the property as a maximum. She stated the problems with traffic are not only on 141 but also on 142 " These streets are dead -end streets. She stated with additional traffic, 142 d Avenue would be a parking lot in the morning. She stated they would like to see the City go along with them and only permit 4 houses per acre. She stated they would like to see the property kept as single - family housing. Ms. Bobbie Langner, 141 Avenue stated she had not received a notice either and this affects her because she travels the roads around there and right now the traffic is bad. She asked if the proposed housing is going to be Section 8 housing because they have these in the area now and there is a lot of trouble with drugs and police calls. Mr. Harris indicated these would not be Section 8 housing. Mr. Larry Chavis, 2140 142 Avenue NW stated when he heard about the proposed project, his concern was the additional traffic. He stated there is a lot of speeding on the road right now and it is impossible to get out of the neighborhood at times. He stated the crossings at this time are unsafe and he does not think adding more traffic to an already problem area is wise. Mr. Ed Bob, 2139 142 Avenue asked if the exit for the street coincide with 142 " Lane. Mr. Bednarz stated as drawn, it did not. Mr. Bob stated it produces an extra traffic problem and a major problem he sees with the sketch. He stated he does not object to low density development of this plat. He stated he believed this would reduce some of the home values in the area. He stated single - family homes would look better in the neighborhood. Ms. Judy Keesar stated her concern is children walking on the road to school and the increased traffic in the neighborhood. She stated more traffic would eventually hurt some kids. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 7 • Mr. Richard Anderson, 2104 142 " Avenue NW stated his neighborhood is a friendly neighborhood where everyone knows each other and this proposal is in the wrong area and their neighborhood is not the place for the townhome development. Ms. Pat Albreight, 2080 142 Avenue NW stated the children catch the bus on 142 " and with added traffic this would be a danger to the children and she feels this development is unneeded in the neighborhood. Motion by Falk, seconded by Kirchoff, to close the public hearing at 7:48 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Mr. Harris stated the questions relating to traffic, cannot control the traffic coming out onto Crosstown but with their plan, they are proposing a sidewalk along the development so children will not need to walk in the street. He stated the townhomes would not be section 8 housing and would be owner occupied townhomes with the starting price at $190,000 up to $235,000 in the neighborhood. He stated they had another plan that put six units onto 142 but staff did not feel this was an adequate plan. He stated that the City might be able to look at a signal at the intersection. He stated Mr. Rademacher owns the land and they have a purchase agreement on the property and the only way they were able to reduce the density was to upgrade the style of unit. He stated a small number of single - family homes would not make any economical sense for a builder or the seller. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if this would be an association. Mr. Harris stated this was true. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if staff looked at the possibility of having two entrances, one off of 141 st and one off of 142 "d . Mr. Bednarz stated they did look at this and there is an existing access off of Crosstown Boulevard that the County would like to see closed. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated the City makes all efforts to post the public hearing and the City has a policy to send out all the mailings and they do advertise in the Anoka Union. He also stated he would encourage anyone who sees illegal activity in the area to contact the Sheriff. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated he did not know about any information regarding Mr. Windschitl owning the property. Mr. Bednarz stated he did not know a great deal about the history beyond the past ten years when Mr. Rademacher bought the property. He stated the City did a neighborhood business study that evaluated the site and provided a recommendation for it to be developed as residential. Acting Chairperson Daninger asked if there was any information on traffic changes to the area. Mr. Bednarz stated that Crosstown Boulevard is a County roadway and a County public improvement project would need to bring the improvements. Traffic is going to increase according to new traffic counts and the roadway is in need of improvement. He stated the City is in the final phases of updating a transportation plan, which calls for Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2002 Page 8 improvements at key intersections throughout the City. He stated there needs to be a funding source to pay for the improvements and they will continue to look for the funds for improvement. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated this is a sketch plan and the Commission makes recommendations to the developer and City Council and then the next step is this sketch plan moves forward to the City Council for further discussion and a decision. He stated this goes through many more steps before becoming final. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated the Commission knows that traffic is an issue. Commissioner Larsen stated that given the traffic issues, she would feel that low density is more appropriate. She understands there would be some financial hardships but it was originally zoned that way and should remain that way with all the concern from the neighborhood. Commissioner Kirchoff stated the developer would not have access to Crosstown so they would be limited in that aspect. He asked how many single family houses they could put in there if they put in a cul -de -sac. Mr. Bednarz stated they could probably get seven R -4 single family residential lots in there. Commissioner Kirchoff asked what if the road was a through street. Mr. Bednarz stated they could put the roadway through but there is not sufficient depth for R -4 lots on both sides of the road. Commissioner Falk stated he would prefer this to be a townhouse development rather than commercial. He stated he agreed with the residents that there should be a limit of sixteen units instead of twenty -four. Commissioner Kirchoff stated he would prefer to go half way and have ten twinhouse buildings instead of twelve. Commissioner Larsen asked if there would only be seven residential single - family homes. Mr. Bednarz stated that if it remained R -4, this is likely all that would fit. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated he proposes low density and would encourage the low- density plan. He stated that development allows things to happen such as parks and trails and they have a Parks and Recreation Commission that look at this. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the December 3, 2002 City Council meeting. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2002 Page 9 • PUBLIC HEARING: RESIDENTIAL SKETCH PLAN FORA DETACHED TOWNHOUSE PROJECT TO BE KNOWNAS "CITY VIEW FARM" LOCATED AT 13313 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW. Mr. Bednarz explained the Planning Commission is asked to review a sketch plan for `City View Farm', an urban residential development containing seven detached townhouse lots on an existing 1.34 acre property. The proposed development would require planned unit development review to provide alternative development standards from the typical R -4 requirements. Mr. Bednarz discussed the criteria with the Planning Commission. Mr. Bednarz stated that due to the fact that access can only be provided from 133` Lane NW, the development potential of the property is limited. If the property were developed under the R -4 Zoning District standards and with a typical public street the result would be three single - family lots. These lots would likely be double frontage lots with backyards facing Round Lake Boulevard. This is not desirable as the view entering Andover could be of fences or possibly cluttered backyards. If the street were designed as a frontage road to allow the three houses to face Round Lake Boulevard, the access at 133` Lane would need to be dangerously close to Round Lake Boulevard. In either scenario, the project would make poor use of the land, would hold down the value of the land, and may be cost prohibitive as a result. • Mr. Bednarz stated the proposed project is a better alternative. With attention to detail during Planned Unit Development Review, the project can become an attractive addition at this entrance to the City. Mr. Bednarz stated there was a neighborhood meeting last week. Mr. Mike Balm, 13313 Round Lake Boulevard discussed the proposed residential sketch plan to the Commission. He stated there are some buildings on the property that are not worth renovating. He stated there would be seven detached townhomes, single family that would be association maintained. Commissioner Falk asked how units with detached garages would sell. Mr. Balm stated he wants to have a backyard courtyard that is useable and away from the road. He stated the detached garages may be an issue but there are only seven units. Falk asked if there is a market out there for detached garages. Mr. Balm stated he thinks that people would buy them. Commissioner Larsen asked how many townhomes are in the White Bear project. Mr. Bahn stated that on the same size property, there are eight with detached garages in the back. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 10 • Commissioner Falk asked if the private drive is sufficient for the area. Mr. Bednarz stated typically all access would be provided from a public street, but that type of scenario would eliminate the development potential of the property. Commissioner Falk asked if this would be a safety issue. Mr. Bednarz stated emergency access is a concern and there is a turnaround between the last two garages in the sketch. It would need to be modified to accommodate the boiler plate turnaround and they are exploring with the City of Coon Rapids the potential to connect the private drive with the private drive in the townhomes to the south. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if the connection would only be for emergency use. Mr. Bednarz stated this is true. Commissioner Falk asked with a private drive, would the association take care of the snow removal and maintaining the roadway. Mr. Bednarz stated the City would not maintain anything south of 133` Lane and would need to be maintained by the association. Motion by Larsen, seconded by Kirchoff, to open the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Ms. Grace Mary, 13385 Willow Street asked if there is going to be a traffic light on 133` • Lane to accommodate additional traffic. Mr. Bednarz stated the County went through the area with striping and modifications and he thought this was all they will see at the present time. Ms. Mary stated it is disturbing because there will be a lot more cars. Motion by Kirchoff, seconded by Larsen, to close the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Mr. Balm stated this project may attract bus line people and the detached garage may encourage the owners to ride the bus. Commissioner Kirchoff stated he thought there was a project in Brooklyn Park with the same type of housing and he liked the design of those. Commissioner Larsen asked how many acres this is. It was noted it was 1.34 acres. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated they are always concerned with private roads and he would encourage the City to look to Coon Rapids for a through street for emergency purposes. He stated he liked the plan as he sees it. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the December 3, 2002 City Council meeting. 0 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 11 i PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSS PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES #109 AND #230 REGULATING DIRT BIKES IN THE CITY OFANDOVER. Mr. McKay explained that a number of Andover residents have requested changes to Ordinance #109 (Regulating All Terrain Vehicles and Snowmobiles) be amended to also regulate the use of dirt bikes and to increase the regulation of ATV's in the City of Andover. There have also been other complaints by Andover residents about the noise, dust and fumes associated with the racing of dirt bikes, ATV's and other vehicles on and off tracks on residential lots. The City Council directed this to be discussed by the Planning Commission and requested for more information in regard to the Ham Lake ordinance, the ATV Taskforce and a confirmation of the number of complaints filed to the Sheriffs office. Mr. McKay discussed other cities Ordinance's with the Planning Commission. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated Mr. McKay mentioned nineteen complaints, does he know how many different addresses this is from. Mr. McKay stated the sheriff s report he received does not have a lot of information. Motion by Falk, seconded by Larsen, to open the public hearing at 8:30.m. Motion carried oR a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. • Mrs. Mary Hilke, 18030 Uplander Court stated she is one of the residents requesting dirt bikes be included in the current Ordinance. She read a letter to the Commission and presented her viewpoint. Mr. Tom Dancheck, 15584 Raven Street stated they feel Ordinance 109 needs to be modified to address a setback distance from the property line and residents and needs to address the repetitive operation of dirt bikes on trails and private properties. He stated they are not trying to ban motorized vehicle use in the City, they are trying to create a buffer. He discussed his issues and viewpoint with the Commission. Mr. Pat Roberts, 18030 Uplander Court stated he would like to add that in talking to Anoka County Sheriff s Department, the noise ordinance is unenforceable as written. Andover's snowmobile and ATV Ordinance is written for public property. This means that a resident can do whatever they like on their own property with no regard to their neighbors. He read from the Ordinance and asked if this could be changed to include dirt bikes and ATV's for public property also. Mr. Brian Flute, 15667 Raven Street stated there were a couple of issues he would like to clarify in regards to the track described by Mr. Dancheck. He stated the track was built for safety and curves so it slows the traffic down. The issue arose because neighbors refused to communicate and work with each other. He stated after understanding of the issue, the amount the kids have been allowed to ride has decreased and the rules for riding have changed and been followed. He stated he has a problem with people that Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 12, 2002 Page 12 • want to change because the City is changing. He stated he has a list of neighbors that agree with him. He stated some of the numbers forbid 2.5 acres from riding. He stated they want to make it clear that by the petition, they want to reserve the right to operate on their property. He stated the majority of people moved out to Andover to do be able to ride. He cautioned the Commission to look at the lots and not just the dimensions. Mr. Jim Linahan, 665 148th Lane stated he owns two and a half acres and moved to Andover from North Minneapolis because he wanted to get away from all the regulations. By putting the setback restrictions in place, the residents cannot do anything on their property. He stated if the setbacks were enforced, this would force people to own more land, which is impossible in Andover. Mr. John Swoosher, 1433 161 Avenue NW stated his concern was finding out the setbacks seemed so excessive and unreasonable. He stated he does not have a dirt bike or ATV or snowmobile. He stated his concern is seeing what seemed to be stunning figures for the change in the Ordinance. He stated residents need some type of resolution other than the sheriffs' department. Mr. Dan Barrett, 17271 Partridge Street NW stated they moved to Andover in 1993 from Minnetonka for the added acreage. He stated they have not had any complaints or police calls. He stated he feels sympathy for what Ms. Hilke is going through but he hates to see the entire City affected by a couple of people who do not follow the rules. Mr. Dan Benedict, 15638 Raven Street stated he lives next door to Mr. Dancheck. He stated they invited the entire City Council over to see the trail they have complained about and Mayor Gamache showed up. He stated they rode the trail for about forty minutes and was amazed. Mayor Gamache stated this was one of the safety trails he has seen. He stated the trail is completely lined with trees and there is not an issue that someone could cross over the property lines from the trail. He stated their four wheelers have never been started at 8:00 a.m. He stated the noise ordinance issue is great and if any one of the vehicles exceeds the Cities limits for over a minute, they should be made to change the vehicle to be remufflered. He stated there are three other neighbors that would like to connect the trail together to create a larger trail to ride. He stated he feels for Mr. & Mrs. Hilke and stated that something needed to be in regards to their issue. Mr. John Stong, 2333 155` Lane NW stated they live on a lot that is 200 by 400 feet and if the Ordinance changed to 300 feet, it would make their yard unusable. He stated they have no complaints from neighbors when riding their ATV's. He stated he cannot hear his neighbors running their ATV's but occasionally they do hear a dirt bike running in the distance constantly. Ms. Patty Howard, 2119 156 Avenue stated she understands the issues with dirt bikes but some of the families have gone out of their way to make sure riding their ATV's does not disturb their neighbors. She stated the neighbors are concerned about what their kids • are doing. She stated they are living in a rural area and the kids generally ride with care. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 13 • She stated as a landowner, they have a right to do what they want on their property as long as no laws are broken. If there needs to be limitations, she understands that but she does not want privileges taken away. She stated she does not want to see the rights of the landowner taken away. She stated the kids deserve the opportunity to ride recreational vehicles as long as the rules are obeyed. Mr. Dancheck stated he did not propose the 300 -foot setback, staff proposed this. He suggested a minimal setback. He also did not state there was continuous use. He stated that comparisons to leaf blowers and lawn mowers are a distinct difference between these types of operations versus optional riding vehicles. Mr. Flute stated he wanted to clarify that on the trails they ride, the kids cannot speed through where they are going. They have never crossed the property line and the kids riding know what they are doing and the safety issues. He stated the track was designed for safety. He stated this is not a racetrack and if the kids are caught racing or timing, the machines are put away for a long time and it is taken very seriously. Mr. Roberts stated that they have to appreciate the people that have moved to Andover for a little peace and quiet. Ms. Hilke stated that as snowmobilers, they went through this a few years ago and she thinks this is something that is happening and as communities grow, they have to look at i what is best for the community and she urges everyone to become active to open up some of the forests trails. Motion by Falk, seconded by Larsen, to close the public hearing at 9:23 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Commissioner Kirchoff stated the issues that certain parties are experiencing are real. He stated he couldn't support adding new regulations everywhere. He asked if he could drive a snowmobile on his property south of 161 He stated the noise ordinance should be enforced. He asked if they have a noise ordinance. Mr. McKay stated they do but the Sheriff has stated that by the time they get to the property, the activity is done so it is hard to enforce. He stated the Sheriff s Department does not consider this an issue. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated they should have staff look at what would make for a more enforceable noise ordinance because there is a concern on how to enforce this. Commissioner Falk stated he does not want restrictions but it is an issue between two neighbors. They need to take this issue as a whole for the entire community. Commissioner Larsen stated she did not think it is just a one - neighborhood issue. She stated they need to be sensitive to the people who moved here for some peace and quiet and the noise is the issue and she would like to find a solution for this. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2002 Page 14 9 1 Acting Chairperson Daninger stated because of a few incidents, this comes to the City's attention and they need to look at this as a whole. He believes the responsible riders in the area will comply with the current Ordinances. He stated he is not in favor of a buffer zone at this time. He stated they needed to look into checking the noise ordinance and how to help the law enforcement enforce this. Mr. McKay stated he would talk to the law enforcement on how to enforce this. Commissioner Larsen stated she would be in favor of some type of buffer zone. Commissioner Falk stated it would be nice for neighbors to try to work things out for themselves because he cannot see a buffer zone as being the solution. Acting Chairperson Daninger stated the direction is to look more at the noise and how to enforce this. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the December 3, 2002 City Council meeting. OTHER BUSINESS. Mr. Bednarz updated the Planning Commission on related items. Mr. Bednarz mentioned that the City would be holding an open house for the Rural Reserve Study. This will be held on November 20, 2002 at 4:30 p.m. FEWVi"I T MAW Motion by Falk, seconded by Larsen, to adjourn the meeting at 9:36 p.m. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3- absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote. Respectfully Submitted, Sue Osbeck, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. s *( Z) TO: FROM: CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CLANDOVER.MN.US Planning and Zoning Commissioners Courtney Bednarz, City Plannew SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING Preliminary Plat of a single family rural residential development to be known as North Lake Ridge for Fields Development Company on property located southwest of the intersection of Round Lake Boulevard and 161" Avenue NW (CSAH 20). DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a preliminary plat for North Lake Ridge. The proposed project will create nine rural residential lots from three existing parcels. Two of the parcels contain existing homes with frontage on Round Lake Boulevard. DISCUSSION Review Process Ordinance 10 outlines the requirements for preliminary plat review. The Planning Commission in its review of a preliminary plat shall determine whether the proposed subdivision is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, and shall take into consideration the requirements of the City and the best use of the land. Particular attention shall be given to the arrangement, location and widths of streets, drainage and lot sizes. 9.02, 9.03 Street Plan Access through the development will be provided by extending 156' Avenue Nw through the development and creating an intersection with Round Lake Boulevard. The developer will be responsible for the cost of extending the existing section of 156' Avenue NW as well as providing turning lanes from Round Lake Boulevard into the development as required by Anoka County. Pedestrian Access No trail or sidewalk is proposed. 156 Avenue is not one of the roadways designated to provide a trail or sidewalk on the City's draft Transportation Plan. This is a reflection of the relatively low level of traffic that is expected on this roadway. 9.44 Easements The standard rural drainage and utility easements (ten feet wide along all property lines) will be provided as a part of this project as indicated on the preliminary plat. Additional easements will be established to cover storm water drainage areas as indicated on the plat. 9.06 Lots .� Provided �� , ��: `af � ".i� ' , , ' • ' • .uryvQAlx4.a�±. !i As the table indicates, the majority of the lots meet the minimum lot width, depth and lot area requirements. The lot width of Lot 4, Block 1 and the lot area of Lot 5, Block 1 fall below the R- I Zoning District requirements. As you may recall, this was a topic of discussion during Sketch Plan Review. Both variances concern lots with existing houses. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission and City Council that variances would be considered for these properties based on the following findings: 1. The underlying property for Lot 4, Block 1 is currently 138 feet wide at the front setback line. The proposal will not change the width of the property at this location, but will provide access to the extension of 156' Avenue NW at the southwest corner of the new lot. 2. At present, Lot 5, Block I is 110 feet wide and contains approximately 1.34 acres. The proposal would widen the property to 209 feet and increase the lot area to 1.38 acres. 3. Existing features such as wetlands, trees and the odd shape of the property provide development constraints. The proposal integrates two existing homes into the plat and decreases the non - conformity for both situations. Buildability requirements of Ordinance No. 10 Section 9.06a(I) All lots are required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06a(1) which relates to lot size and buildability requirements. The applicant has demonstrated that each of the lots will be buildable. Wedand/Storm Water Pond Buffer Ordinance 114, Wetland Buffer, further regulates lots adjacent to wetlands and storm water ponds. This ordinance requires a minimum of 116.5 feet between the front property line and either the delineated edge of a wetland or the 100 year flood elevation adjacent to a storm water pond. All of the proposed lots will meet this requirement. • 9.07 Parks, Park Dedication The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that park dedication and trail fees be collected for the proposed development. The developer is also required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No. 8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. 107, Shoreland Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 108, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Coordination with other Agencies The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU, Anoka County Highway Department and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item. Attachments Resolution Location Map Preliminary Plat (11x17 in packet) Grading Plan (11x17 in packet) ACTION REQUESTED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for North Lake Ridge, subject to the conditions of the attached resolution. E 0 0i Cc: Round Lake Development Company, 2923 South Coon Creek Drive, Andover, MN 55303 • CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA • STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO R -02 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "NORTH LAKE RIDGE" FOR WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: (20- 32 -24 -11 -0020) The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 20, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, except that part described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Quarter Quarter; thence South along East line thereof 891.5 feet; thence West parallel with North line of said Quarter Quarter 596 feet; thence North parallel with said East line 110 feet to intersection with a line parallel with said North line and drawn West from a point on said East line 781.5 feet South of said Northeast corner; thence West along said line to its intersection with a line drawn South at right angles from a point on said North line 825 feet West of said Northeast comer; thence North along said line 517.49 feet to a point 264 feet South of said North line; thence West to West line of said Quarter Quarter; thence North along said West line to Northwest comer thereof; thence East along said North line to the point of beginning. Except Parcel 75, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 14. 0 (R20- 32 -24 -11 -0007) & (R20- 32 -24 -11 -0008) That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 20, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, described as follows: - Commencing at the Northeast comer of said Section 20; thence South along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 781.50 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence West, parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 596.00 feet; thence South, parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 110.00 feet; thence East, parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 596.00 feet to the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence North, along said East line a distance of 110.00 feet to the point of beginning. Except Parcel 74, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 14. (R20- 32 -24 -11 -0010) That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 20, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: . Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 20, thence South along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 781.5 feet to the actual point of beginning of tract to be described; thence North along last described course a distance of 138 • feet; thence West parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 264 feet; thence North, parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 183.90 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 562.81 feet to its intersection with a line drawn South at right angles from a point on the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, distant 825 feet West, (as measured along said North line) from the Northeast corner thereof; thence South on said line a distance of 321.90 feet to its intersection with a line drawn West from the point of beginning and parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter, thence East on said parallel line to the point of beginning. Except Parcel 75, Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 14. Together with an easement for septic system drainfield purposes over the following described tract: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 20, Township 32, Range 24, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter distant 781.5 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West and parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 200 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continue West and parallel with said North line a distance of 60 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 60 feet; thence East and parallel with said North line to its intersection with a line parallel with and distant 200 feet West of said East line; thence North along said parallel line a distance of 60 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to restrictions, reservations, or easements of record, if any. WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the preliminary plat. WHEREAS, the applicant has petitioned to vary from the 2.5 acre minimum lot size requirement of the Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District (R -1) for Lot 5, Block 1, and to vary from the 300 foot minimum lot width requirement of the Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District (R -1) for Lot 4, Block 1; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the special circumstances for the proposed project are as follows: 1. The underlying property for Lot 4, Block 1 is currently 138 feet wide at the front setback line. The proposal will not change the width of the property at this location, but will provide access to the extension of l 56 h Avenue NW at the southwest corner of the new lot. 2. At present, Lot 5, Block 1 is 110 feet wide and contains approximately 1.34 acres. The proposal would widen the property to 209 feet and increase the lot area to 1.38 acres. Existing features such as wetlands, trees and the odd shape of the property provide development constraints. The proposal integrates two existing homes into the plat and • decreases the non - conformity for both situations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. The developer obtains all necessary approvals and permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU, MPCA, Anoka County Highway Department and any other agency that may be interested in the site. 2. Park dedication and trail fees per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. 3. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies and guidelines. 4. Such plat approval is contingent upon a development agreement acceptable to the City Attorney. A financial guarantee will be required as a part of this agreement to assure, typical subdivision improvements will be completed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor LJ North Lake Ridge Plat M Project Location Map w�E a Andover Planning r m t .E . m E too e I I I R g n i l n rw�wa €tl 3' E ig C gR s_ a N a� ff � q9 tl� i Azs - �i E s {a6 i r ji j, 6 ° ry tl tl = 44 i ! HER at §F� 9 90111 fill Ipq p � E eF . i r r � ; IIII t 8 - l �3 "eea8 a a8 Is oil tl� A e �E _j LAK4DGE a lMM1Y W(IIti RIF Mfa Y� IIln�; E! f , E a E �t 1 f IL ` 1 J if l � F I ti x� r P-N ° r. � I 1 1 a 1 I K 9 Y i S ;tl E f i r � r I � I pp t; � 4 x r O aZ �x �i I 1N z �d p = p er D M C i F� t� • 1 � u I j i E a F P t j t�E - F 1 ° ry tl tl = 44 i ! HER at §F� 9 90111 fill Ipq p � E eF . i r r � ; IIII t 8 - l �3 "eea8 a a8 Is oil tl� A e �E _j LAK4DGE a lMM1Y W(IIti RIF Mfa Y� IIln�; E! f , E a E �t 1 f IL ` 1 J if l � F I ti x� r P-N ° r. � I 1 1 a 1 I K 9 Y i S ;tl E f i r � r I � I pp t; � 4 x r O aZ �x �i I 1N z �d p = p er D M C i F� t� • 1 � u t 15.00 w i s — � �"____ � 1 _� � % - - \ r I � 1j _J •may..---- °- - _l'%� / a L . 1� i i 1 x I\ � Jr Jr 6 / m I1 � R ;a"; _ •\• /, ,' ` : I I_ l /-- -` -�- - _ • ` l am ; � y� .•• I I $ I I ON Ap jai cn ��' a \\ 7 is f 1 • (D 1 01 11 I i �� S i ;l. a i f PY'r 1 (D 1 01 11 I i �� S y r � X I / 1 I 1 I 4 / y •� I l i I .ai \ _ _ ow ® 21 I A 1 toll a Pei z B s i l l i • NORTH LAKE RIDCE= T 2/8 .woupl wl sm� .:.i�...:� 2W14n1 TREE PRESERVATON PLAN ao� y � ur.ee y�,y, ,.wn ew. r• +..•r r.�r sa I N I r✓ _ y r � X I / 1 I 1 I 4 / y •� I l i I .ai \ _ _ ow ® 21 I A 1 toll a Pei z B s i l l i • NORTH LAKE RIDCE= T 2/8 .woupl wl sm� .:.i�...:� 2W14n1 TREE PRESERVATON PLAN ao� y � ur.ee y�,y, ,.wn ew. r• +..•r r.�r PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: l 1 0a'Jld Karon NORTH LAKE RID CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF moi,o Co. mw l ot Me W cans of H NEI/4 of li,e WE%/4 W Sec W, t 32, k 2. N. Ism of tie 140/4 of t WI/4 W $s. 20.7.32 R. 24 Kooll Ffo� Inc "`o no. Rawl. Rack S.Q F.W. N MAST &.401.17 Rae R000l,J i _ 3 —1 — 7 -- AW 41 Y= canna In. A LAKERIDGE xwf Rout * 7.k Ed F')fIft At Sma Inc. (R-1) W.F- Lon, A P-L P elflw F-7 ry 14 l 1 0a'Jld Karon NORTH LAKE RID CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF moi,o Co. mw l ot Me W cans of H NEI/4 of li,e WE%/4 W Sec W, t 32, k 2. N. Ism of tie 140/4 of t WI/4 W $s. 20.7.32 R. 24 Kooll Ffo� Inc "`o no. Rawl. Rack S.Q F.W. N MAST &.401.17 Rae R000l,J i _ 3 —1 — 7 -- AW 41 Y= canna In. A LAKERIDGE xwf Rout * 7.k Ed F')fIft At Sma Inc. (R-1) GE ANOKA I �e pmt 5 1� 1 o I € _Ic� I a I x 1 8�� � r / 'I / \w � o o c [ 8 e g w d of 41- - n - ^ w SU cVF I J I USA` BttvrMouw Surface I o t Lav La i ENSMNG LEGAL DESCRMTONS (R20- 32- 2e- 11 -W2p) The Nrilrawt Danner M the Norlfiroat Wr14r of Section 20. Twnwerp 3Z Range 24, Anoka County MMwote, .Weil that part OuvDM w lolbwe 6pYnMq at Yre NMryroel caner or WW purer Qu«t«; thenc4 Srrlh 'go, E. Bw ; Deal Bgl, feet; Mann Mal PMgkd with North Win wood Wrier ,,,to. o,,,to. 5,, owl: U,no, North PwgeIM with wood Emt IM 110 nand to nla nactM end e We p«aBN NM weed North fire and dmw Nbt Frn o ni an Need Eoal fvw )01 5517, . 5 an hest gw South haw of o got "I'd v Mt an Newwl qd N co w1 m In e, IMe th 8 ence 25 W NM m Wee, al d oak line to eta Interfacial with o We own SYNh at a of who NwNeed, Mow, Mwa North °long goy Irr No 51 T.4B Met to o Point 264 M1al SWM of Uld North IM: Thence W ,, to Win, IM or pay wart« 0.1, 0.1, U wee { North along avid Weet line to N«Mweat came Merooh thence Eost deg roW North IM to the port or begin . s Except coke, 75, NaM County Highway Rtpt -W -Noy Plat Ne. 14. 9 (R20 -32 -24-11 -ODD)) k (R2D- 32- 24- 11 -DOJ6) I That port of pe Norheat puwNk of the Northeoat Wart, M S,ba, N. Towerwha 3Z Range 24, Makc, County, I dsraod w fOpawz 1 C«nmwc al Ma N«Uwt awake Of aald Sector 2U thence SOOIZ long the Ewl IM of We N« Q uarter ay, _ wai Wm; "T paratltl with the Nan M1 roc el of vd NOrlhaan Colonel Of Nre earth m Quartr a EMonee , den o Mel; dance Swath. goopel with the Ent Rare o1 said Wrldenat Coal of Uwe Hardwo Wortr a d'rbnce of 11DW Cwt; three i Ecdl, wr0Ne, with th rth No line of sdd NorthroM party, of Me Nr,wee, oar o d¢fenw of go DD few, to the Feet the of goy Nrthvwt Wan« M tae Norhear, plartw; tans Nestle elan, gold Ego IM1e, a oetance, of 11000 owl to the oOne of owgrnag -I Except Parent 74, Maya Grundy H'vfeq Ry151- al -WOy PM N 14, l (X20-32 -M -11 -0010) Thos part of the Northeast Winter of UN flo hoowl Quarter of Swum 20, rowehip 3Z Range 24. Anci Cror t, p Minnesota, d�aea w IoNOws =iyandnq at the Notheart awnr of wand Sweden 20, thenw South along the Eart lily of veld Northroat Oua1w of Ore Narlikkaf Wrl «, a dla M tanae of 781.5 M to thin actual path o1 beginning of Wet to be m Nortl then. North city, loot daecdled coueee a ddlwlce of IND feet thence Wst parallel with the North IM on of ak NarNfwael Daft« of the rlonan W haart«, a carbon. of 264 haw, dens North, w age, who th e Eval IM of eo anal m n kAM Ox ay, O Northeast Qprtr o tlatonw et 183.90 feat; Manw Meet PwaYel with Me North the of ®k NaNhe®1 garter of tae NMhee, Wait« a d ,howw of 562,1 Mpt to Ida MWSao koi with o IM Mann South at eight ay,," Wm a point m iM NdM Ire of We N«Meeet Wwl« of tM N«Mrovl goal dleMl 821 lent Went, (w mwared, long And N" 'r aria o IMe) fawn Ida Nwm« thereof, thwa South an Need IM o dletma M 321.90 feel to Nor ateneeclkn y IM tram West ham Hoff Ile t can Part d levinning Me code, Mik Bw North IM of eak NwMeael Wart«, three Ease on ( I L H weed praM We to the pew of 1- gionIng. Esefo PwwS 75, Maka Cwnfy H4hway Right-Of-Way Not No. 14. C Together with wwen«IM fen Oi l S draafy mw W the d Paae away o the fallowing deacraed trxt Not pan d the r9lato Cocnwr. SecB w a 20. Tohal SZ RM, 24, dwwawd w Woe, CrormoncMq 0, o yank m Na Ea. line of Mod NwMroa1 Duty dMOnt 781.5 Wet SauM M he N«Mwrt on, MrwF, Mice Went and pedal Mtn Us earth We M aged NMMOr, Wan« a different Or 200 feet w No can, point DI h,Mag, W new aontraw WeM and pragel with and NwM IM a dMlonce of 80 bet: Mcrae South and prdel WBh Me Ean IM of eak NarlM1wp, Wanar a dletance 01 60 feet; theta Eat and parallel with woy Now, line le he r,oweaUon will a Mme poMd with and astral loo bn Neal of apd Ewl IMe; thence NwM along and p,,, IM o d,cock 0f 60 lief to Me poW of lvBrnrg S jn-t to fwnUlr:Nar,0. Iwwfmdtone, or aahgrlen4 M more. N my ELE 01W4ER AND DEVELLPrR: Roan Ldr Dea Ira. Cwepwy ATM Jan E4tle R20 -24-11 -0020) 2923 Scom Coen creek DrM PXONEISED LOT OEI IY: Mdawr, Man ... It 55303 MINIMUM FRfNTAM 76Y4M -1540 FEE oNNER: Richard! k Sharon Sherd (2D 32-2111 -CCO7) 75549 Rend Loki Deulw.ard NW, (1IF32 -2Ft1 -ODOR) "d we.. YMwnto 5901 pan, - 50 feet 753- 421 -MM RF COVER: Neel R. Nwow 20-32 -24-11 -0010) 15554 Rath Lakin Bueewcrd W. Andrew, Npnnewto 59Th 10 Mel In MMl Mil d bl law a n d w ngawd 763 -9971 SRY`EYOP AND DESN}Ae RLK- Kweetw LM lwla;dal S fie Systems ANn: yH Cal.. or Lyle Rk oc: Loehr Run Ricca MAO 1321 Andower Bearmand NE. lot 4. Black 1 de tc, road rental, Nam LNw. MMwnto 55304 Let S. Block 1 w to In .rev. 763- 434-76ee ENCIEIIC RLK- KUumsb. LTD cahlrpctiVe aR 150 a IN' pM! will mMl M the ANN: Len Diane. P.C. Ike of r-mr.. mabFe tree. Lo, raw 37.500 k a. of rec 6 bet of in.m , IeOY R.. 3WS M1 1321 Md. Bauw,w NE. Her Late. M 55304 763-7846 ROUND L.4K£ VICINITY MAP (Coo M) DEXOTs PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION .0010 DENOTES EKST. SPOT OEVAil .. ' .. 000 - - - VENDMS EXIST. O TO DENOTES Ex151'. CMNEL SUREACm AREA 0 DENIUME EnSt OCHODEE SURFACED AREA DENOTES EAIST. BITUMINOUS SURFACED AREA DENOTES ExSt. CONCRETE WRB AND Wr,a, DENOTES UmT. uciff pCF � OB4Ors Exist. POAER POLE s o owns EXIST. GUY POUF DENOTES EmsT. GUY MRE -llE -- DitionS E3]ST. MDENPOUND ELECTRICAL UNE -0E -- DENOTES Efes' OVERHEAD ELECNICAL LNE DENOTES ExST. UNDERGROUND GAS UNE - - W DENOTES IDST. WFIVND DEIMEATED BY EMTN SnjEHCE ASSOCIATES. M -X- DENOTES Ex15T, PENCE ONE 6 Sol SYSTEM SM BUR BY NARK TRADE B-1 xx%x Q MOTECMIICAL SGL BMK BY BRAUN- NTTRTEG ST -1 lax.x 1o DENOTES DUST. TV BO% TMCAL LOT ______ - -__ - - - - ivy maMage Me unity womnkind 5B SB � y I I I I ( 11 I ( an -I 10 s eg gencl eal h . I I I ) R 1 Location, I (Buad g - I work I I thaw ' I SU A0 L---- ____ - -__ -- TOT& ACEAK£; 25.67 are. BID DENOTES EASE TEIEPXOfE 80% SOIL BORING EXISTING 2CNNG: q -1 (pen City Y AntlpW Pyrmkg DeparM«it) DENOTES Cost A M & 8 1 , YANHOIE TABLE PROPOSED DETb1E5 ExIST. YAL ED% TABLE OF CONTENTS SW,IMde Magnet, Fla ore (9) ai gk lam0y r a dmtd btu maimmuN LOT SRE: 2S arm PXONEISED LOT OEI IY: 2.85 wren pr lot MINIMUM FRfNTAM 300 feet M the Wooing mlbock We BUILDING SETBACK MWMUM: Fran = 40 feel reet Profile Side - 1O Aen t Plan sken Coma - AD Met bits pan, - 50 feet Ccunty Rood - SD Mt DRAMA6E AND UTILITY EASE EMS SBALL BE MOV AS FOLLOWS 10 Mel In MMl Mil d bl law a n d w ngawd SOURCE OF WArER SIRPLY: mWdinam end. SEWAGE DISPOSAL MENOD: lwla;dal S fie Systems MIERSED oR Blu.. Loehr Run Ricca MAO VARIANCE MWESTED: lot 4. Black 1 de tc, road rental, Let S. Block 1 w to In .rev. Let; Block 2 w b 150' w ISO' WNing. Oren, NOME REGARDING VARIANCE cahlrpctiVe aR 150 a IN' pM! will mMl M the Ike of r-mr.. mabFe tree. Lo, raw 37.500 k a. of rec 6 bet of in.m , IeOY R.. 3WS M1 TABLE OF CONTENTS get Title relinino- Plat room PI. ' Plat M reet Profile t Plan bits FROaRRID LMEAR ROAD MIL MA 033 mpw. DAIS OF PREPARATNIN: Agora 7. 2002 NoTs: I. AI fate withi "is pepewd -ndmi an are M camplimia MM Me 'dfy w Awwr suld.alw onswace Na. 101 Section 1.06,93} as ommdee. 1 Eu.IMq hens an Loris 4 ontl 5. Back 1 wholl ki 3. Al onehe to 5a thickened to t pueDc BENCHMARK: 10 Frry MA M E Ace e{ ' 'Me p2160 1e, Parr" an" zwih d house of "Del' Rauh Lake Bwlewrd MW. ElewOon: BB7.54 fwd (N,,, 1921). NOTE: I1NOEgGRWNO UTILITIES SHOWN ARE AS MASHED BY UTILITY coMPAHIES OR MSBE M THE REL, UNDERGROUND UTU11E3 CA 4 RgON MAY 10 Ex15T ANY ExCAVATC CVI TTNG SIT: THAT NEIE NOT MAIMED AT THE TIME CE Tee SURVEY. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE N. SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1 INCH = 100 FEET O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND �l O DENOTES 112 INCH IRON PIPE SET, BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY. PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR Likom MY DREG SUPERViSKM AND NAT I AY A DULY RE6ETpED "NO WRWy,, UMM WE LAWS of i11E STALE 6 MAMIESOTA DATE A A e d Sro 7 inn sZ }= NO X 251 SwAined Renewed Oct alo 8, RrfaN Oclalr t0, MW CAINE do ASMCIATES LAND SURVEYORS, INC. A D11 OF f6x- KUOaSTO LTD. tT 120 Hghry I5 N.E - Hen Loan, Mm,z1e III 163-434 -7646 2001 -411 -1. Sec. 20, T. 32, R. 24 Sheet 1 of 6 Sheets plie- i \ —� i ------------ �♦•i�iA. A..� ♦• .' AAA 1 t�`�'A i��Ai A� � i ��A't�� �A�A�t ����• �• �AAJAAw ♦AAAA•A.i 5i` ►i•Oi�iii0.00it00� AA ► ♦AAA.' ►AAAA�♦ ..IIAAAAAAAAAAu "•� r ot, • A • A A A A A U�A i � •IAA. •.�. �A A �A��!�O.1 • ►•AA��AAA♦ - �� �.:��i•Ai�li., 'iii i P 111 . •1,` IT " `► IN Arril ell Existing Utility & Drainage Easement ' 6 (Per • .-• . . ♦' 6 � tt C ((((! J j i J1? "q!�� �7 t f l yy i f t % J 7 ��iiJ:MItJJ 5. 7(p 1 \ Mum 1 1 � 1 110 �1 { {1 1 - r 1 i Easement - -- ; y - - - -� ) I i o, / L / O 2 _ �T �anT�.�.� �• 891.3 7A i I 3 „ I I It ; es -L3-1 I y,4, J i E�BT72 I � N � 0 i r i CRrI 48 No" boftM RfBp11q GOPHER STATE ONE CA VICINITY MAP LEGEND L1 .t PROPOSED ENS1TNG — — — — — - - -- n _ �T �anT�.�.� �• 891.3 7A i I 3 „ I I It ; es -L3-1 I y,4, J i E�BT72 I � N � 0 i r i CRrI 48 No" boftM RfBp11q GOPHER STATE ONE CA VICINITY MAP LEGEND PROPOSED ENS1TNG — — — — — - - -- RIGHT-0W-WAY UNE PROPERTY LINE y,4, J i E�BT72 I � N � 0 i r i CRrI 48 No" boftM RfBp11q GOPHER STATE ONE CA VICINITY MAP Jil s d € g lag sy: r €3� TiT N b8- LEGEND PROPOSED ENS1TNG — — — — — - - -- RIGHT-0W-WAY UNE PROPERTY LINE CURB LINE `� V/ lu R V SECTION \ MY- DRtAPHWIL CONTOUR LRE EDW OF TREM SM s E SILT FENCE PRIN -CM FILL AREA PROPOSED SW= AREA ' SPOT ELEVATION I SPOT ELEVATION (PLOW 141ST OILY) I —W— ST. RERAND pEl/FAIED BY EARTH EARTH SCEE N �� • AS A590CJATES. NC. KQM SWW SYSTEM SOL Bgft♦IS BY NAAC TRAOEIM 1l� S (EDTECHNIM SDL BORN= BY BRAIN ROERTE H II 11 1 I O YJBCA709ENT AREA DRAINAGE BOUNDARY 'L3 ■ ■ B i !! e R - - - - GTCHRASN DOIAgARY '. - TREE FEmcE 1 16.5 FOOT PETLAND BUFFER © � O F HOUSE AT i NOTES 4 CLEAR ALL OBJECTS IN SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE Jil s d € g lag sy: r €3� TiT N b8- 02002 tic s� ++ All- at s * �® •`t�••���f a I 0me °° �a � ■ is -- - - - -� �- -- - - -- -- - - - - -- C - - -- I I , 1111 a / I \ I REMOVE PBRTOt EXIS71Nf' ORIY£ B6 -L3 -1 LF- .3 ✓/ / J� i .1 1 'J ! ` J FBLO \ '• I (3 -�6 / 1 III .■�1 `/ i \ 892.6 B4 3 -- 'y I P • \ ` y Y / (pRpp ' / a�� 89116 \ .891.3 I I l 0 1 x tin E S ed \\ Gara Well f .65 �' x i / I y ' L ----- J A 1 Cads � I r 1 ON 1 I RE -886.W � INsuu AVEL 1r IiNil _____ —/ " W J� l f zB �.� 1 ' I 2B a 1 1 ' 8E-88 &03 8E -88641 1 d 1 1 i 1 111 1 iiii.. \��' �' III - \E —eeom IE 1i1i1 ylr�c'. \63- T 7.1 - -- \687.91 �� rrn.m r.r. mr• rrt:r• l )ti r BS -LS AT Ix , lie/ vrw�.+ vo.a i 7 I ` Ib4 5b L,3-2. / / 1 8 1 10 DAY Sw v .888.3 61 -0 !/ L4 -2 ` 61 -L4 -2 l -� 1-.f! i'Xi ^ �i�i� /i /�iiii7" `\ /83_ 1 Irr - 1 f \\ -- _------ -. - - -- — am M t ' 1 • I ' - -3 Yfle0.E DFW*WA - - - - -- / — -- MAx sLOnE,a, o 1 �9 I 'x OEPARTIENT FMQ= ,- --IE BB6.10 R �I a O; z� { Na a I� L"f f3- T6'TE�+"' '.' a F7.l�t- i'7t " "�7t- !.)�S_i>a t"Ff•�'�:'�0 Ot� vie s: �� >..at�-r.>, .t.� • a• • a �m NOTE REGARDING LOT 5, CnrrtrueOann of 1w = 15O paa M .l r.n in 1M 2. 1 BLOCK R 150 L 150 PAR for of nunNrwr agbaa bw Let bn 57,500 w L of a 6 frt abe a "whin. 1IXIL R = JDBt R. L BERCHURRK: . ND pannl nab w E faz at Ponr Pale OWSO tat poor We south of b ..... at 15616 RaaW lea BaASraa NW. ENa•oura 867.51 Ave (NSO lsn}, 0 50 100 M °p Ca M. Hours before - ggi - - -- GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ` TWn CMW AM 651 -136 -0002 WAN. TOO Frw 1 -a0D- 252 - 1166 LEGEND PROPOSED EASTING — - - — — - - — PotlR- OF -NNY LIE i PROPERTY LINE DIM® 111E N/ W RAP 11 I { x-a** TavwAmw LINE EDGE OF TREES - LOOM DREVION OF ORAMAGE SLOPE S6_T FENCE � \I PROPOSED FiL AREA / PROPOSED SEPTIC AREA kT. I 000.0 SPOT EI MTM I bB6 75 (000.0) SPOT ELEVATION (ALONG taST ONLY) 1 s —W— WEIL DF11E111ED m FARni SCIENCE TEI ASSD kTM ASSDCUTfS, N INC. � 1 r SEPTC SYSTEM SOL BORPM By NARK TRIIOE D I O I s -I zlxx CEAfEWNCAI SOL BORMKS BY 9WM MflERTEON RESUM I OPoIEWAY O SUBCATGfM ENT ARFA A1e B�Si� Ei ORAWASE BOUNDARY 6srlMli the CATCHBASIN BOUNDARY J� TREE FENCE - ® 165 FOOT WEILAID BUFFER 1 E MAD t 4 Well © DEN07ES PROPOSED CUMOM GRAMO AT 111E OF HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 1 I / I I �a O 1 z NOTES: A CLEAR ALL O&ECTS IN SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE I `/ • a RF•NOYE Of6TM1a NNNIMYVaY OEPARTIENT FMQ= ,- --IE BB6.10 R �I a O; z� { Na a I� L"f f3- T6'TE�+"' '.' a F7.l�t- i'7t " "�7t- !.)�S_i>a t"Ff•�'�:'�0 Ot� vie s: �� >..at�-r.>, .t.� • a• • a �m NOTE REGARDING LOT 5, CnrrtrueOann of 1w = 15O paa M .l r.n in 1M 2. 1 BLOCK R 150 L 150 PAR for of nunNrwr agbaa bw Let bn 57,500 w L of a 6 frt abe a "whin. 1IXIL R = JDBt R. L BERCHURRK: . ND pannl nab w E faz at Ponr Pale OWSO tat poor We south of b ..... at 15616 RaaW lea BaASraa NW. ENa•oura 867.51 Ave (NSO lsn}, 0 50 100 M °p 4t Eel FROM: CC Planning and Zoning Commissioners Jon Sevald, Planning Intern Courtney Bednarz, City Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Lot Split (02 -11) to create two rural residential lots at property located at 15212 Nightingale St. NW for Woodland Development. DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The property owner is seeking approval to divide the subject property into two single - family rural residential lots. The existing home on the smaller lot will remain while the larger lot will be platted. • The property is currently zoned R -1, Single Family Rural Residential. DISCUSSION Woodland Development is requesting to split the property into two lots consisting of 35.11 acres (Parcel A) and 3.27 acres (Parcel B). Staff is currently reviewing the preliminary plat of Woodland Fourth Addition, which will be an urban plat consisting of 81 single - family lots on Parcel A. Nightingale Street NW The existing property extends to the centerline of Nightingale Street NW. A separate easement document must be created in favor of Anoka County to convey access rights over the east 60 feet of this property. This item has been included as a condition of approval. Easements Ten -foot drainage and utility easements will be required around the perimeter of the property. A separate easement agreement must be created. This item has been included as a condition of approval. Applicable Ordinances Ordinance 40 regulates the division of lots. Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 establishes the provision for minimum lot width, depth and lot area for zoning districts. Both lots will exceed the minimum lot width, depth and lot area for the R -1 zoning district. CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US • Future Development The Woodland Estates Fourth Addition plat illustrates the public improvement project for how Parcel B could be integrated into the plat in the future. This project will be designed to ensure that the property has the potential to be converted into urban residential in the future. Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the Commission recommend approval of this lot split request subject to the conditions of the resolution. Attachments Resolution Location Map Lot Split Sketch Aerial Photograph ACTION REQUIRED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval or denial of the proposed lot split. • Respectfully submitted, ' °' Jon Sevald Cc: Byron Westlund, Woodland Development 9 CITY OF ANDOVER . COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST FOR WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT TO SPLIT A RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOT INTO TWO RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS AT 15212 NIGHTINGALE STREET N.W. The property to be divided into two single - family residential lots legally described as: Parcel A The North Half of The North Half of The Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying northerly of WOODLAND ESTATES SECOND ADDITION, except the north 418.36 feet of the east 340.00 feet thereof. Subject to Nightingale Street N.W. over the easterly 60.00 feet thereof. Parcel B The north 418.36 feet of the east 340.00 feet of the North Half of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, . Minnesota. Subject to Nightingale Street N.W. over the easterly 60.00 feet thereof. WHEREAS, woodland Development has requested approval of a lot split to subdivide a rural residential property into two rural residential lots; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 8 and 10; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held pursuant to state statutes; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the lot split request is not detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the lot split on said property with the following conditions: 1. The property owner shall prepare a survey indicating a temporary easement for a farm • road along the northern boarder of Parcel B, and indicate the building setbacks on Parcel B. 2. The applicant is required to dedicate a ten -foot drainage and utility easements around the • perimeter of the property, and a 60 -foot easement along Nightingale Street in favor of Anoka County to convey access rights. 3. The applicant shall submit a separate easement document establishing a 10 foot drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of Parcel B. 4. Payment of a $1,700 park dedication fee. S. Payment of a $412 trail fee. 6. That the lot split be subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No. 40, Section III(E). Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this day of , 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER Mike Gamache, Mayor ATTEST: • Victoria Volk, City Clerk • A N 3 c a W s= e 0 p, la d z E- V y cn w o � O y W H w 01 N N 11 ?� W ly 'C J w L.i W a N rn C 2 L- :y E o J m N W ` w Inn ir U Z < c> Lnn LLJ � a❑ ao o `' a � W N V CCo C U W W tll � \ d W N d d > C nm O W L O C W W E d W Z� V w 3 0 N Q C W O _ O d W L 9 N r � fl D E N �= O c m T O N � L W W m E 8 v A 2 w ID n o W f° W d L W E� N N m C 2 4 W W W N w T N L � 4) a v o 2-0 CL O o 9 .� c £o p c `c y L 0 Z • Pro posed DESCRIPTIONS p North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township County, Minnesota, lying northerly of WOODLAND ESTATES J0 cept the north 418.36 feet of the east 340.00 feet thereof. a Street N.W. over the easterly 60.00 feet thereof. ( J ] � {) Woodland L It of the east 340.00 feet of the North Half of the North Half orter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, > Nightingale Street N.W. over the easterly 60.00 feet thereof. 29,507 Sq. Ft. — 35.11 acres 42,251 Sq. Ft. — 3.27 acres J • I 1 I �- I I I I I I ,-- Morem uc w 1/2 OF w.c +N OF SF t/4 OF SEC. a. T 32 R u I l I I OM UC w. +/2 ark iR or &W. i /nor s¢22LSiRx � I I 1 I I I I - - -- ------- SIB 8'40'4!E— �^ 340.07 I ( eo I L 0: co m j $?fie cfa no co G r)o I 0 � �0 4 o n I � I I cr; I / I I �� (�J I S88'40'43' eo _ 340.07 ea I � J uw K 1/2 rf kr 1/4 a rvsr uE a 1/2 ar K 1/2 of sw. 1/4 OF sEe 2z T. az rt 24 G I ) 1 \� \\ X07 a r CM TCMD L — 4oanox w I I � I I I I Hakanson 200 0 200 40�� Anderson Assoc.,Inc, Lone Surveyor. SCALE I N FEET M "" "rte 763-427-05M -' , .. j, .. " it I ~ H ii, I" ~ h~ ,:"'1 \2...S,; ? ','J,...." '~ ~:a1 :6.: ,f;J. f" ;Ltt.., *( Z) TO FROM: CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US Planning and Zoning Commissioners Courtney Bednarz, City Planner/ SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Rezoning (02 -04) to change the zoning designation from R -I Single Family Rural Residential to R -4 Single Family Urban Residential north of Woodland Estates 2 nd Addition for Woodland Development. DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission is asked to review the proposed rezoning to allow the Woodland Estates Fourth Addition to move forward. DISCUSSION As with all rezonings, the City must meet one of the two following findings that are provided by state statute: 1. The original zoning was in error. 2. The character of the area or times and conditions have changed to such an extent to warrant the Rezoning. The property is located within the 2020 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and also within the current phase of sewer expansion (2000 -2005) in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Tines and conditions have changed with the availability of utilities and it is appropriate to rezone the property at this time to allow an urban residential development. Attachments Ordinance Amendment Location Map ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the rezoning request based on the fact that times and conditions have changed. RewectUly submitted, • y e Cc: Woodland Development 13632 VanBuren Street NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8, SECTION 6.03, ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance 8, Section 6.03, The Zoning District Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended as follows: 1) Rezone land from R -1, Single Family Rural Residential to R -4, Single Family Urban Residential on approximately 40 acres legally described as: The north half of the southwest quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota 2) All other sections of the Zoning Ordinance Shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk • • • Woodland Estates 4th Addition ■ `E�QQO�Q lid ■���t� t�� ...: Q�QOO non oao mo PIN �.- o nod© o �. iaui�e�uuur�u c Project Location Map N W E 5 Andover Planning I • CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Planne* SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat of a single family residential development to be known as Woodland Estates 4 Addition for Woodland Development on property located north of Woodland Estates Second Addition. DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a preliminary plat for Woodland Estates 4` Addition. The proposed project will be created from two twenty acre parcels immediately north of Woodland Estates 2 " Addition. DISCUSSION Review Process Ordinance 10 outlines the requirements for preliminary plat review. The Planning Commission in its review of a preliminary plat shall determine whether the proposed subdivision is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, and shall take into consideration the requirements of the City and the best use of the land. Particular attention shall be given to the arrangement, location and widths of streets, drainage and lot sizes. 9.02, 9.03 Street Plan Access through the development will be provided with a street connection to Nightingale Street NW. A new roadway, 152 " Lane, will extend to the west edge of the development and terminate in a temporary cul -de -sac to allow the street to continue west as a part of a future project. A street connection will be made from 152 "d Lane to Uplander Street NW to the north. Uplander Street NW to the south will terminate in a cul -de -sac. A temporary cul -de -sac will be provided at the north edge of Quinn Street NW to allow a future street connection to the north. Pedestrian Access An on street trail extends through Woodland Estates Second Addition and ends at the north edge of existing Uplander Street NW in that development. This cul -de -sac will be extended north but will not reach 152 "d Lane NW. The on street trail will transition to an off street trail between lots 13 and 24 of Block 3. The trail will reach 152 "d Lane by traveling through a neighborhood park immediately behind these lots. N Staff is recommending that the on street trail resume along the south side of 152 Lane NW in addition to a five foot wide off street sidewalk for less active pedestrian traffic. In -this scenario, • the City would pay for the widening of the street to provide the on street trail and the developer would pay for the sidewalk. An alternative that has been discussed is to eliminate the on street trail and simply provide a ten foot wide bituminous off street trail. This scenario was not selected because it conflicts with what the City has required for trails in the surrounding neighborhood and because a single trail would likely cause conflicts between active and passive pedestrians as traffic along the roadway increases over time. 9.04 Easements The standard urban drainage and utility easements (ten feet wide along front and rear property lines and 5 feet wide along side property lines) will be provided as a part of this project as indicated on the preliminary plat. Additional easements will be established to cover storm water drainage areas as indicated on the plat. 9.06 Lots All of the lots will meet or exceed the R -4 Single Family Urban Residential requirements. It should be noted that a 35 foot wide power line easement exists along the north edge of the proposed plat. There is an overhead transmission line within this easement. This easement also contains a farm access road that allows the property owner to access the farm fields to the west. The farm access road will need to continue to provide access to the farm fields until the property is sold for another use. The developer will be informing potential buyers of this fact through a disclosure statement and in purchase agreements. The City will require that each affected lot have a temporary easement dedicated for this use so that it will appear on a title search. The easement would remain until the property is sold for another use. Buildability requirements of Ordinance No. 10 Section 9.06a(1) All lots are required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06a(1) which relates to lot size and buildability requirements. The applicant has demonstrated that each of the lots will be buildable. Wedand/Storm Water Pond Buffer Ordinance 114, Wetland Buffer, further regulates lots adjacent to wetlands and storm water ponds. This ordinance requires a minimum of 116.5 feet between the front property line and either the delineated edge of a wetland or the 100 year flood elevation adjacent to a storm water pond. All of the proposed lots will meet this requirement. OA • 9.07 Parks, Park Dedication The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that a small park be provided as indicated on the plat and that a park dedication fee be collected for the difference between the value of the lot and the total per unit park dedication fee that could be collected. A trail fee will also be required. The developer is also required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No. 8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. I07, Shoreland Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 108, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Coordination with other Agencies The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU, Anoka County Highway Department and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City • Engineering Department regarding this item. Attachments Resolution Location Map Preliminary Plat (Full Size in packet) ACTION REQUIRED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Woodland Estates 4th Addition subject to the conditions of the attached resolution. F : Cc: Woodland Development 13632 VanBuren Street NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 • CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA S STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO R -02 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "WOODLAND ESTATES FOURTH ADDITION" FOR WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 32 RANGE 24 LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: The north half of the southwest quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the • preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. The developer obtains all necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU, MPCA, Anoka County Highway Department and any other agency that may be interested in the site. 2. Contingent upon the approval of the Rezoning of the property to R -4 Single Family Urban Residential. If this request fails to be approved, in whole or in part, the preliminary plat shall be considered null and void. 3. Park dedication and trail fees per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. 4. A temporary easement shall be created upon each lot affected by the farm access road. The easement shall be structured to expire upon sale of the property owned by the grantee of the easment. 5. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies and guidelines. 6. Such plat approval is contingent upon a development agreement acceptable to the City Attorney. A financial guarantee will be required as a part of this agreement to assure typical subdivision improvements will be completed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: • Victoria Volk, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor 4 Woodland Estates 4th Addition ©d��a MEMO � _ minll_ p 4 © ® ©BBODDG 0 00�� V c DO DO O O 4� SIB ImA noncom JUIVULILIJ v 0 � "',r0�6 ®Bf3 ©689�����' �•��y cr.��,r3��n>, 000[2; n Q•f �- ry�QQ�IJG 0 Project Location Map N W E S Andover Planning x c €f s + fill 1 �gg g loge qRe V O O E fill J € 3 a Elm E �o 9 3 �e E E EI !Ii �d 8 all "°1 f ill e� r yS� N K i t 0 • -�' ° � o � N � n� r o I C ^` C� W CQ l� O V O O E fill J € 3 a Elm E �o 9 3 �e E E EI !Ii �d 8 all "°1 f ill e� r yS� N K i t 0 • -�' ° , �S��.yy 11'rtY R T1 \Ii� K A '" .�r L, `� I �.LL A 1� ■mom F HO � y >. k 4V V I� fill, I III .,�, ( - _....~ ... . . \. 'I : I \ ~ \ ::, ,/' f L.:I\ i/ /,_r---\ " I" ...1 , -J..___ .... ,"_., ,.,." 1 ,. \ , I :~=~~=::~=~:;~~~:~~~~: o:::~=;::0.~;:.~~~:~~~~,:~:~...:~~;:~~~~- ., ---r"'~ : - -.~- -- -- - - -- ~;(- ~~;="~~~=~S\ . ------ e .....r.......' , " ;. ,- -, ~ .. I ~. ':,/'J r: " . ", t . . ,'I' j .. ',: '\\1: .- ." f~\'~:~~' . " ('~' I ' , ,\ " ~. .: ~ ~ l\ ( i: I : Po.4 " \:: I) :1: j- "--fIN'" '" . \ , I "I t / A ' n ~ 1 ' , ' :__--\\-,r'i" ',: ! 1'(:}":1 / ' " I "> l ' ~ ,r-.. ,I .1\- oL( , ., : ~~Z~~t1~~ o '"" {' >\,. . f ~ l" I. './ o:=i I' I " I ,.:1 J~ ::: ': .:: t E-t I II l~ ." , I,':i I" II... ,,1 I _ ! Z ....,' : \ "g .J' ,111 ,'_ - .... ", ' '~ ' fF+.:-:'~~"'-" o -- 'f' ,'. i u ).1: f (//i.1 " , tIll "", ,'...',' , l ' 'II ;:: VI z ...." / I I i~ I :; i :-'1 ......- ',1..1 o _h..-. ... : ,., I ~li.'"~- ..... t' " i ,I r .\ '" tIl ,,--=;'..""-.'- -.'- - ~ r'.' \ 'itt<:::1 ~:z ~,..i / ,,: :' li.~ ',!~1.~- rz:l 0 '.-__le,'.' I t-4 .. !.. I.~ e-o"'-' '\' "i!!i . '~ - . ~ ~ : . "'!<l~l% I J\ \ I: I ::).0' " " ' ~ T ' ~!:.: 11,' , l I I "I ":U--i::'i- ~ ::d~: ! (:" '} E-4 : ' \. I 11 \' 'ff \ ::3 ~.n'---'Or--_---;J-n'r- J:t: . 1 1 I I I I' ,11 1,..1 ..... ';;J i \ i 7'-,- I II,,' .1 E-4 0 ~l 1--- I ' ":tr:-~~~1' ;;J rz. 0: 1- I :' I i ~"""l",, I \'\ :r ~ "r tIlr ~ : """, I ",\\ I\}' t ~ ~~ I I:~ 'I r"t~trt~~~=1 ~ I I I t II -< 0 e-o 0 rz:l---m--t---- --nn ' "1'" . Z J -< j ~_____m_\__m_~__~n' , ~: \: :1 _I.~ < e-o / ", I .\'::~ \ tIl Q'---"':------"';----nT- 11\' ,I, ' e t ll,": - \ I:l:< rz:l 3 " ", I '(f':H'P.- ~ <<, ", I if ' . :: ..": ';, III I I $:\ I ~ ~ " '-..j. ;;!i i I \ ] " 3 ~ .. I ~ 0 i... 1 :: t,l ,': ~i Z 0 "-"-- ' r,q'"l-.""~ - ~ l= ~ '-v . rr\\ ., ~ 0 i.l, I ~\\l.. 15 ~ ft. .! 1 /~-~..,:j 1- I _~;'~""J;:-4 \. I I.G " IIIII I I I ! Ihl,11111 II III i IIhdhlll !: .; I. I ! ~ ~ ~ ~lIm 11I11I 1I1~ III ~\lll '11 HlI i I t(Dl: :&> ~~ I e i II It Ip • z 0 E , q A C z F z O �+ Z w °a WO o P4 w P4 A 5 T, A o F 0 O 8H5, I Y all lit 1 B wi l l i Big i if • CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Plann� SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING Special Use Permit (02 -12) for an Area Identification Sign for Woodland Estates 4 Addition. DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Applicant is proposing to construct an Area Identification Sign for Woodland Estates 4 Addition. Ordinance 8 requires a Special Use Permit for this type of sign. DISCUSSION The proposed sign will be located at the southeast comer of the proposed development. The sign will work within the theme created by the sign for Woodland Estates Second Addition. A photograph of this sign is included in the attachments. Attachments Sign Location Photograph of Sign ACTION REQUIRED The Planning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the proposed Area Identification Sign. Cc: Woodland Development 13632 VanBuren Street NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 is CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT FOR AN AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE WOODLAND ESTATES 4 ADDITION PLAT ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS; The north half of the southwest quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Woodland Development has requested a Special Use Permit for an Area Identification Sign to be located within the Woodland Estates 4 Addition Plat; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 8, Section 8.07; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City of Andover; and 0 WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Special Use Permit on said property permitting Area Identification Sign to be located within the Woodland Estates 4"' Addition Plat subject to the following: 1. Review of the proposed sign by the Andover Review Committee and issuance of a sign permit in conformance with Ordinance 8, Section 8.07. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this day of , 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk 7 r Ir 00 Cn 1` �.. �i I. I 9 - gDDINtrs t M.M. MCCy RoY� ILITY E SE ENT — — — �. - -- s a "• MCICELVEY N • Ai ----- _ -_ - - 15,968 sq. ft�. \ -- - - - - -- - = 0.37 acres y i % 4 �`�.9 I � 1 uu s�rt x- v . i 17.903 4959 / s t. 4 •01 "� r i i 0.41 aces 1 94.68 \�= 5"4_44 0.00 � - g c 281'24'07" ,., 00 !+ ?T606 "T I142,16b S4 ft. ` \� N J L =5x3.72 i ; I 3.26} ocres I L _ 1 564 q� .fi. I .��' P / p \ Z r c �R = 0.00 •.., j W � �� .fie � I !� L �j ®Y gyp, — — —1 • I `�...1i1�(�j�r =_ P I Z 0 T: Argo C� 1 545 sq. fig. I I 1 V1 I0:27 ocres} m s - 3D'.. 30 I -I z �-�€ T R OVED I I 1 . 4,4J1 sj. ft{ 6i >, �. S 8 5 _ J 1 to _�_ o I J SCL- I - 1 =48,9 + - --\— ,, ., 9 W ..i••,• , p . C3 '880�sq' f I 46�y+ . fi I i J - o I A.3 acres � O� A34 acres 1 4, 0.33 - cares I 3 0t ; IP4,154- 5 II -�� ��a. aa�J 0 j�_32 ocre� i� i i 4L 95.0 ^ _. N 85 0 I uae en 1 a n 95�` 95D - i� r 191.1' v KF18.E1N L k MW ANN SLYZUK - �y i N G2322435 N `i PIN 22 2252Z�31DOT0 jI1.. PIN MQUI000 i PIN 223214310068 �' 2282213/ --�_- "I I SA-!E1 * f y f: } i a a a. A 'y Y C i ^t r • 4w v x Y]1� ♦�v r i 4 y Ate •.W �_y /rM 1 1 � + a 1 y 0. T P "ia tl, P t + l4 y I r 1. • T i + F i yy Y tf T a �J p 3 � a 4 + w } r + Woodland Estates 4th Addition aw i �0 w ©gal ° � :DAB DD ©DD8 ©DDD ©C' m .1 u_ 1. 1 .f Project Location Map N W- 5 Andover Planning ow 1. 1 .f Project Location Map N W- 5 Andover Planning rJ TO: 10 CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVERMN.US Planning and Zoning Commissioners Courtney Bednarz, City Plann# SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING Rezoning (02 -05) to change the zoning designation from R -1 Single Family Rural Residential to R -4 Single Family Urban Residential for Shady Oak Cove on property located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and 161 Avenue NW (CSAH 20). DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission is asked to review the proposed rezoning to allow the Shady Oak Cove project to move forward. DISCUSSION As with all rezonings, the City must meet one of the two following findings that are provided by state statute: 1. The original zoning was in error. 2. The character of the area or times and conditions have changed to such an extent to warrant the Rezoning. The property is located within the 2020 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and also within the current phase of sewer expansion (2000 -2005) in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Times and conditions have changed with the availability of utilities and it is appropriate to rezone the property at this time to allow an urban residential development. Attachments Ordinance Amendment Location Map ACTION REQUIRED The Planning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the rezoning request based on the fact that times and conditions have changed. Respect ly submitted, • t We4z Cc: Mike Quigley, 1875 Station Parkway NW I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA . STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8, SECTION 6.03, ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance 8, Section 6.03, The Zoning District Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended as follows: 1) Rezone land from R -1, Single Family Rural Residential to R -4, Single Family Urban Residential on approximately 12.5 acres legally described as: The north 854.90 feet of the west 660 feet of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 14, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota except roads and subject to easements of record. 2) All other sections of the Zoning Ordinance Shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. • Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk 0 Shady Oak Cove Plat Egg PIP, Mal 0 *4* • Project Location Map / ♦ l N W Andover Planning f • CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CLANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Planne* SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat of a single family residential development to be known as Shady Oak Cove for Penta Management Group on property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and 161 Avenue NW (CSAH 20). DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a preliminary plat for Shady Oak Cove. The proposed project will create 16 urban residential lots. The existing house will be located on one of the lots. DISCUSSION Review Process Ordinance 10 outlines the requirements for preliminary plat review. The Planning Commission in its review of a preliminary plat shall determine whether the proposed subdivision is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, and shall take into consideration the requirements of the City and the best use of the land. Particular attention shall be given to the arrangement, location and widths of streets, drainage and lot sizes. 9.02, 9.03 Street Plan Access through the development will be provided by extending 160th Avenue NW to the west and terminate in cul -de -sacs to the north and south. Both cul -de -sacs would require variances to the 500 foot maximum length allowed in Ordinance 10. Cul -de -sac length is measured at the intersection of centerlines where an opportunity exists to take two or more routes. In this case the measurement is taken at the intersection of 160 Avenue and Drake Street NW. The North cul -de -sac would be approximately 570 feet in length. The south cul -de -sac would be approximately 860 feet in length and will likely be extended further south in the future. This issue was discussed during Sketch Plan Review. It was determined that there was no other feasible way to provide access into or out of the property due to the location of wetlands, County roadways and the location of existing development to the south. t Pedestrian Access • No trail or sidewalk is proposed. 160 Avenue is not one of the roadways designated to provide a trail or sidewalk on the City's draft Transportation Plan. This is a reflection of the relatively low level of traffic that is expected on this roadway. 9.04 Easements The standard urban drainage and utility easements (ten feet wide along front and rear property lines and 5 feet wide along side property lines) will be provided as a part of this project as indicated on the preliminary plat. Additional easements will be established to cover wetlands and storm water drainage areas as indicated on the plat. 9.06 Lots The plat has been revised to ensure that all of the lots will meet the minimum lot width, depth, and area requirements of the Single Family Urban Residential (R-4) Zoning District. An outlot that was previously shown at the southwest comer of the plat was removed and this area was distributed to lots along the west side of the roadway as recommended during Sketch Plan Review. Lot 2, Block 2 The existing house will be located on Lot 2, Block 2 of the proposed plat. An existing detached accessory building is also proposed to be located on this property. The transformation from rural acreage property to an urban lot will cause the existing detached accessory structure to be made non - conforming due to its size. The applicant is requesting that a variance be granted to allow the structure to remain as it presently exists. Staff is not recommending in favor of a variance based on the following: 1. The non - conformity will be caused by the property owner. The property owner's decision to sell the property for development and allow it to be converted from rural acreage to an urban development causes the non - conformity. 2. The City Council has determined that urban neighborhoods are not an appropriate place for large detached accessory buildings and has recently amended Ordinance 8, Section 4.05 to clarify the requirements for urban neighborhoods. 3. It is customary throughout the Metropolitan Area for large detached accessory buildings to be removed as land is converted from rural acreage to urban neighborhoods. Buildability requirements of Ordinance No. 10 Section 9.06a(l) All lots are required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06a(1) which relates to lot size and buildability requirements. The applicant has demonstrated that each of the lots will be buildable. Wetland/Storm Water Pond Buffer Ordinance 114, Wetland Buffer, further regulates lots adjacent to wetlands and storm water • ponds. This ordinance requires a minimum of 116.5 feet between the front property line and either the delineated edge of a wetland or the 100 year flood elevation adjacent to a storm water pond. All of the proposed lots will meet this requirement. 2 Proposed Wetland Fill Area • The plat indicates that two small areas of the wetland (lots 9 and 10, Block 1) are proposed to be filled as a part of the project. The Coon Creek Watershed Management Organization ( CCWMO) has reviewed the proposal and determined that this is feasible. A letter from the CCWMO is attached. 9.07 Parks, Park Dedication The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that park dedication and trail fees be collected for the proposed development. The developer is also required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No. 8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. 107, Shoreland Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 108, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Coordination with other Agencies The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU, Anoka County Highway Department and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item. Attachments Resolution Location Map Preliminary Plat (Full Size in packet) ACTION REQUIRED The Planning an d Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Shady Oak Cove subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. =mitt • Cc: Penta Management Group, 1875 Station Parkway NW Andover, MN 55304 CITY OF ANDOVER • COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO R -02 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "SHADY OAK COVE" FOR WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: The south 384.90 feet of the north 854.90 feet of the west 660.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 32 North, Range 24 West, Anoka County, Minnesota and the north 470.00 feet of the west 660.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 32 north, Range 24 west, Anoka County, Minnesota. Except the west 25.00 feet thereof taken for road purposes as evidence by Final Certificate recorded as Document No. 788086. WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission • recommends to the City Council the approval of the plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. The developer obtains all necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU, MPCA, Anoka County Highway Department and any other agency that may be interested in the site. 2. Contingent upon the approval of the Rezoning of the property to R -4 Single Family Urban Residential. If this request fails to be approved, in whole or in part, the preliminary plat shall be considered null and void. 3. Park dedication and trail fees per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. 4. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies and guidelines. 5. Such plat approval is contingent upon a development agreement acceptable to the City Attorney. A financial guarantee will be required as a part of this agreement to assure typical subdivision improvements will be completed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: • Victori a Volk, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor 4 Shady Oak Cove Plat • M Project Location Map w�E e Andover Planning I Constance Boulevard N.E. (Zi a. C.S. -T No. 20) M �Rnoka County Nighway /ghf of ai• la No. 20 - _^ a a I' l I l I ly 1 - 1 T I 1 1 TodA 18.5 BUFFER S F S.F. - -•— - - - -- (R -1)' Qa A A v g -- ' W. .� Ir u I A I 1 , : ITION I I I I O I I 1 Irow Mr O� A M AM 1 pti�_ 1 1 \ I � ' I � I i I I I I I I L _ Lit I I ILI J I 1 - - -/q 1 1 a n I� Its b I � I III If � O U ' 3 �;>4 I' l I l I ly 1 - 1 T I 1 1 TodA 18.5 BUFFER S F S.F. - -•— - - - -- (R -1)' Qa A A v g -- ' W. .� Ir u I A I 1 , : ITION I I I I O I I 1 Irow Mr O� A M AM 1 pti�_ 1 1 \ I � ' I � I i I I I I I I L _ Lit I I ILI J I 1 - - -/q 'FROM : Coon Creek Watershed Dist • FAX NO. : 7637550283 Oct. 31 2002 09:54AM P1 PERMIT COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 12301 Central Avenue NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55434 Permit Number: 1011 Project: Shady Oak Cove Issued To: Location: Pente Management Group, Inc. 1875 Commercial Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Southeast comer of Hanson Blvd. (CSAH 78) and Constance Blvd. (CSAH 20) in Andover, Section 14. Permit Application: 02 -73 Purpose: Construction of water main, storm and sanitary sewer, and street improvements. At their meeting on October 14, 2002 the Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District reviewed and approved your permit application. The following exhibits are on file describing the approved project: Drainage Area Map, by LSJ Engineering, dated 5/23/02, reed. 613/02. • Sediment Control Structure Detail, by LSJ Engineering, dated 5/23/02, revised 9116/02, recd. 9/24/02. Runoff Calculations, by LSJ Engineering, dated 424102, recd. 6/3102. Shady Oak Cove Wetland Delineation Report, by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, dated 5/l/02, recd. 5 /8102. Transmittal letter, by LSJ Engineering, dated 9/18102, recd. 924102. Hydrocad calculations, dated 9112/02, recd. 9/24/02. Soil boring report by STS Consultants, dated 6/03/02, recd. 9/24102 Preliminary Plat, by LSJ Engineering, dated 9/16102, recd. 9/24/02. Revised Grading & Erosion Control Plan, by LSJ Engineering, dated 10/16102, recd. 10/25/02. Escrows, $1123.00, recd. 10/25/02. The Board of Managers found the project as planned to be in accordance with the Rules and Regulations, and Guidelines of the District, and therefore, approved the permit as requested. A follow up inspection will be conducted at the project site to assure compliance with all stipulations to this Petmit. Failure to comply with the foregoing may result in the recession of the Permit, and is a violation of Minnesota Statute 103D.545, a misdemeanor. This document is not transferable. Date of Issuance; /02; Date of Expiration: 10/31/03 Tim KeIVOff6ict AdmiQ6 Se e<: Sooa Erickson, City of Andover . Ed Matthiesen, MWH Americas, Inc. File ;# 02 -73 • CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CLANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: D. Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner�� SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING Rezoning (02 -06) to change the zoning designation from R -1 Single Family Rural Residential to R -4 Single Family Urban Residential for Constance Corners on property located at 16034 Crosstown Boulevard NW. DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission is asked to review the proposed rezoning to allow the Constance Corners project to move forward. DISCUSSION As with all rezonings, the City must meet one of the two following findings that are provided by • state statute: 1. The original zoning was in error. 2. The character of the area or times and conditions have changed to such an extent to warrant the Rezoning. The property is located within the 2020 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and also within the current phase of sewer expansion (2000 -2005) in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Times and conditions have changed with the availability of utilities and it is appropriate to rezone the property at this time to allow an urban residential development. Attachments Ordinance Amendment Location Map ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the rezoning request based on the reason that times and conditions have changed. Respectfully subm' ed, • D. Ty er McKay Cc: Greg Schlink 3564 Rollingview Drive, White Bear Lake 55110. t0 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA . STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8, SECTION 6.03, ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance 8, Section 6.03, The Zoning District Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended as follows: 1) Rezone land from R -1, Single Family Rural Residential to R -4, Single Family Urban Residential on approximately 5 acres legally described as: The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, except the north 208.00 feet of the ease 520.00 feet thereof, Section 14, Township 32, Anoka County, Minnesota EXCEPT that part of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying within the Right -of -Way of the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad • Subject to Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 20. Subject to Right -of -Way of County Road No. 18. 2) All other sections of the Zoning Ordinance Shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor 0 Constance Corners Plat • N Project Location Map w S Andover Planning CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 e( Z ) FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: D. Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner f or SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat of a single family residential development to be known as Constance Comers on property located at 16034 Crosstown Boulevard NW. DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission is asked to review the preliminary plat submitted by Bruggeman Properties, LLC of Constance Comers, an urban residential plat creating 42 single family residential lots to be created from property located to the southwest of the intersection of Crosstown Boulevard and 161'` Ave NW (CSAH 20). The proposed project area is • approximately 36.8 acres and would include 42 units. The proposed density (1.14 units per acre) conforms with the low density land use designation from the Comprehensive Plan for the property which allows up tc 3 units per acre without PUD review. DISCUSSION Review Process Ordinance 10 outlines the requirements for preliminary plat review. The Planning Commission in its review of a preliminary plat shall determine whether the proposed subdivision is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, and shall take into consideration the requirements of the City and the best use of the land. Particular attention shall be given to the arrangement, location and widths of streets, drainage, lot sizes and arrangements. 9.02, 9.03 Street Plan The proposed project would be provided access from 161 Ave NW (CSAH 20) from the north, Crosstown Boulevard (CSAH 18) from the east and Sycamore St from the south. A public street to be named Sycamore would be extended into the project and end in a cul -de -sac. The street will be 30 feet wide within a 60 foot wide right of way as required by the City's minor urban street requirements. Boulevard Sodding Four inches of black dirt and sod are required to be installed within all boulevard areas. • 9.04 Easements The standard urban drainage and utility easements (ten feet wide along front and rear property lines and 5 feet wide along side property lines) will be provided as a part of this project as N indicated on the preliminary plat. Additional easements will be established to cover the storm • water pond and wetland areas as indicated on the grading plan. 9.06 Lots All of the lots will meet or exceed the R-4 Single Family Urban Residential requirements as indicated on the attached preliminary plat drawing. Buildability requirements of Ordinance No. 10 Section 9.06a(1) All lots are required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06a(1) which relates to lot size and buildability requirements. The applicant has demonstrated that each of the lots will be buildable. Ordinance 114, Wetland Buffer, further regulates lots adjacent to wetlands and storm water ponds. This ordinance requires a minimum of 116.5 feet between the front property line and either the delineated edge of a wetland or the 100 year flood elevation adjacent to a storm water pond. Although the location of the wetland buffer needs to be adjusted to be measured from the 100 year flood elevation of the storm water pond in the northeast corner of the development, with this adjustment all of the proposed lots will meet the requirements of Ordinance 114. Engineering Department and Engineering Consultant Comments Attached is a memorandum which contains a couple of comments regarding the proposed project. These comments involve minor plan adjustments and additional documentation that will result in a clean preliminary plat document. Staff will be meeting with the developer's engineer • to resolve these issues before.this preliminary plat is taken to City Council. An update will be provided at the meeting. 9.07 Parks, Park Dedication The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that park dedication fees be collected for this development. The developer is also required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No. 8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. 107, Shoreland Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 108, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Coordination with other Agencies The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU, Anoka County Transportation Department, and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the • City Engineering Department regarding this item. Pa N • Attachments Resolution Location Map Engineering Department Comments Preliminary Plat ACTION REQUESTED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for `Constance Corners' subject to the conditions in the proposed resolution and the changes specified in the engineering department's memo. Re ec ly submitted, D. Tyler Mckay Cc: Bruegggeman Homes, 3564 Rollingview Drive. White Bear Lake, MN 55110 LI U 3 V1 CITY OF ANDOVER • COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO R -02 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF `CONSTANCE CORNERS' FOR BRUEGGEMAN HOMES ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 32 RANGE 24 LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS; THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, EXCEPT THE NORTH 208.00 FEET OF THE EAST 520.00 FEET THEREOF, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXCEPT THAT PART OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILROAD. WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission • recommends to the City Council the approval of the plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. Contingent upon compliance with comments from the Assistant City Engineer in the memorandum dated November 20 2002. 2. The developer obtains all necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU, MPCA, Anoka County Transportation Department, and any other agency that may be interested in the site. 3. Contingent upon the approval of the Rezoning of the property to R -4 Single Family Urban Residential. If this request fails to be approved, in whole or in part, the preliminary plat shall be considered null and void. 4. Park and trail dedication per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. 5. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies . and guidelines. 4 • 6. Such plat approval is contingent upon a development agreement acceptable to the City Attorney. A fmancial guarantee will be required as a part of this agreement to assure typical subdivision improvements will be completed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor • 0 Constance Corners Plat N Project Location Map w 8 Andover Planning 0 0 " jB85 CROSSTOWN ,BoUl.EVARD N,W, -ANDOVER, MINNESOTM5304 .(76~) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923. . ' c'. " ,.:' ',' '..' . ," "_,,' _.t ,.: ,:, - ..,'. . ,u ''''''''OitAI#DUM .' , Tyler McKay. A$sociate Planner" . ,'. ", " ".cOP1ESTO: ., "',,' " ,""" . 'FR~t.t~cjHaas: f,sst.City Engine~r ",PATE: .' Noveri1ber20;2(j()2, . REFERE;NCE: ",' CO'l1stancetomers/Gradih9, bi'aln~e & Erosion tontrolPlarVReview~ " < . -. --' - . ,-. -;,' '- .' ..-, ,'.: , .' ,';" . . , ~follclwin9 items have yet' to be completed. '. . 12, Notdone. ' The Geotechni'cal Evaluation Report needs to be revl,sed toinch,lde a taple that idehtifies the' , e, ~asi)nal h~g~w~ter m6lrk.(mottled s9il or if, mottl~d.~oil d~snot e~ist, t~nitwil1 be, neces~~rytoin,dicate , hIghest antlclpat~d water table) ,ascjefjned,n()rd,n~nce,10 for eacJ:l bonng. (Have notre~lvedrespon~e from the geotechnical engineer regarding this. '." ' " ' ,,' 18. Not done. It appears some of the'Anoka County Highway Department Comments have not been , 'addressed., ' , . . ". - ,', J: '. ' . .' .. -, _.'. . ..: ' _ , . -' .! - ~_ AdditionarCommentsihReaardstoReVlew#3\>' ,",' '. '" < .,"" ' ,.",., ',' 1, '" Sheets 2-6, The revision QOx of eachsbeet Sh'all il'ldicate the reVi~w'# that it Pertains to; , ,,' . '." r" ;.; - ~, ~. . -. • DE � `t i o. 2o_ Poll _ •• ^ - - w{ MINIS .. ,,. J I o l --------- - 35 S€ S 88'40 %5 0 E o. / // � M 520.114- 170 w. n. 90.994 w. n. « .P eeP.i I L 999 eq. n/ 1_ \ I 0.90 ° C `/ � 'b>: � ( 4.1048 / l ~ I Q i one > > ^ \r +� - I 0.35 -Oft- J L- Am � 1 33021 ae. W • :. — f4evoese en,� . `., r r r/ - .°" 1 , ' rw, , I Z7b* 0.33 11 \1 . 9.93 Q aNS f ° -- _. 0.13 i : P 6s 1 7 _ 'I r - 1 - ` I "�• 1 1 oern « +} � 22 q. /1 6� fi ry Z ;4I a� m / Ooo"m Ole EaoPIPw1t< M n L ' J � .90 1 ` 10 0 0 e LlN R Z e rr r x - _ 1 Zr (71W 33L, 1 .za w x 75 `OU a� .a R - J c3 1 ys,i., _ _� 5 d OO -_ + ° � 13 n 5 I m 64 20 +Ss) Pa ene t (I Psi f 7 7 «ra. 11 j l J .3755 sq. A �' I � ■• 1 18 19 0ca 1 1.e �S ° — It LP. 1,7u n ' $ s qRe, ,. _ 9 i V d 14,167 e0. . / �Peq• ; � we I / 23.406 0.54 w. yyn 104,040 o eo- R 40, \ 1 °erne /p1 e^ ` ' l3 2.39 eery 0.94 w.P 1 2E J i`,,, Pwl i ` s I, 1307.25 i '4sl t Ps i w. tr P 1 p P " :007 oo,,ol Z * i j \ N 88'27'56 ° W 55 I 50 II¢ 1 B4reWhl k E • 1 - Leo of tllo NEI /4 of tflo 5E1 /4 elof Sec 14, 7. 32, R. 24 of • '• e w W dole) k moo a 0rme Ss 3 a� Li i } f .s r • CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: D. Tyler Mckay, Associate PlannerW -- SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (02 -13) to install two permanent area identification signs at the entrances to the Constance Comers development. DATE: November 26, 2002 INTRODUCTION Bruggeman Properties wishes to install two permanent area identification signs at the entrances to Constance Corners, a proposed 42 unit single family development on Crosstown and 160' Ave. DISCUSSION Ordinance 8 Section 5.03 regulates Special (Conditional) Use Permits. Criteria for granting of a Special Use Permit: 1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands, 2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, 3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. The area identification signs for this development would not have a negative effect on the surrounding area, and is a standard addition to a number of developments within Andover. Attachments Resolution Location Map ACTION REQUESTED Staff finds that the criteria for granting a Special Use Permit has been met. It is recommended • that the Special Use Permit (02 -13) be approved subject to the conditions in the proposed resolution. RespectfullP itted, D. Tyler Mc Cc: Greg Schlink 3564 Rollingview Drive, White Bear Lake 55110. • • • • CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES, LLC FOR AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGNS ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, EXCEPT THE NORTH 208.00 FEET OF THE EAST 520.00 FEET THEREOF, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXCEPT THAT PART OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILROAD. WHEREAS, Bruggeman Properties LLC has requested a Special Use Permit for two area identification signs. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined • that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 8 Section 5.03, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit request; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Special Use Permit for area identification signs on said property with the following conditions: 1. The area identification signs comply with Andover ordinances. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this day of ' 2002. • CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk h Constance Corners Plat Project Location Map E C� N 0 W�E 6 Andover Planning