Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/13/02CITY of ANDOVER . 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W:•ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304• (763) 755- 5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May la, 2002 Andover City Hall 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes - April 9, 2002 3. Variance (02 -03) — Variance to Ordinance No. 8, Section 4.21 Fences and Walls to increase fence height in front yard setback for,proposed fence at 15672 Kiowa St. NW for John Dalos. Staff report by Courtney Bednarz; City Planner. 4. - Variance (02 -04) L Variance to ordinance No. 8, Section 6.02 Minimu District Provisions for reduction of side yard setback, for proposed detached accessory building located at 1735 148' Lane NW — Richard Wagner. Staff report b y Courtney Bednarz, City Planner. 5. Public Hearing: Residential Sketch Plan for a single family and townhouse project to be known as `Foxburgh Crossing' located at the northwest corner of Hanson Boulevard and Andover Boulevard — Boone Builders. Staff report by Courtney Bednarz, City Planner. 6. Public Hearing Residential Sketch Plan for a single family development located at 14'44 161 Avenue NW — Mark Tibbetts. Staff report by Courtney Bednarz, City Planner, 7. Public Hearing: Residential Sketch Plan for a single family development located at 16034 Crosstown Boulevard NW — Brueggeman Homes. Staff report by Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Lot Split (02 -07) with variances to minimum lot width for property without address located immediately south of 13503 Crooked Lake Boulevard east of the intersection of 135 Circle and Crooked Lake Boulevard (Parcel ID 33- 32- 24 -43- 0001) = John Stahnke Homes. Staff report by Jason Angell, Planning' Intern: 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Special Use Permit (02 -06) for repair garage, towing service and outdoor storage at 3118162 "d Lane NW. Staff report by Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner. - f . 10. PUBLIC HEARING: Special Use Permit (02 -07) for retail trade and services in the Industrial Zoning District for property located at 3138 162 °d Lane NW — Clarence Zuleger. Staff report by Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner. 11. Other Business 12. Adjournment • I* -------------- CITY of ANDOVER TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, qty Planner SUBJECT: Item:2. Approval of Minutes - April 9, 20()2 May 14, 2002 ---'------'----" -. " CITY of ANDOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSlqN MEETING -APRIL 9, 2002 The Regular Bi-Monthly~Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Jay Squires on April 9, 2002, 7;03 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Chairperson J~y Squires, Commissioners Tim Kirchoff, Mark Hedin, Douglas Falk, Tony Gamache, Rex Greenwald, and Dean Daninger. There were none. . Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 Page 2 comer of the site and would have access to County Road 7 and the house would be situated towards the north half of the property. He stated it does meet the minimum lot width; lot area requirement and no variances are involved. He stated staff was recommending approval on this matter. Commissioner Kirchoff asked what the policy was on additional access to a County road. Mr. Bednarz stated sometimes with plated property, the County will request that access to the County roads not be provided for the whole plat or for a portion of it. In this case, the property can meet the cities requirements as far as the lot minimums for size and area. He stated they did check with the City Attorney about whether or not access to a lot that meets the cities requirements could be denied just because they would not want another access there, his opinion was no, if the lot can meet the cities requirements, access does need to be granted. Motion by Daninger, seconded by Hedin, to open the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Mr. Matt Kuker stated this was his property they were asking to split and extended his appreciation to the Planning Commission and Staff for their work to get the lot split. 0 Motion by Gamache, seconded by Kirchoff, to close the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Chairman Squires stated a letter was received from some neighbors that oppose the lot split request. Commissioner Daninger asked the reason this property was delayed was because the applicant did not show the buildability of the property and he wanted to confirm this was the reason it took so long to get to this point. Mr. Bednarz stated that was correct and it had to be established where the lowest floor in the house could be in relation to the elevation of the wetland to ensure that the basement would not flood. Additional information was needed and had been provided. Commissioner Greenwald stated that he read the letter where the neighbors were against this. He asked Mr. Kuker if the pond was on his land. Mr. Kuker stated the south edge of the property is into the pond part way and towards the south end, it is all pond. He stated it only bordered two properties besides his. Commissioner Kirchoff stated that people who wrote the letter would have the opportunity to buy the property. Mr. Kuker stated that was true. Mr. Bednarz showed a map stating where the new lot would be located and where the opposed property owner's property was located. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 • Page 3 Commissioner Hedin asked Mr. Bednarz in distance where the house on the north property sat in relation to the pond. Mr. Bednarz stated he was not certain regarding the exact distance from the property line. Commissioner Hedin stated he would like an X to mark where the house would be on the new property and asked if the neighbors could still see the pond. Mr. Bednarz showed on the map where the new house would be located on the site. Commissioner Kirchoff stated on Parcel A and Parcel B, according to the report, they were both 2 '/z acres but looking at the engineering design, it showed 2.3 and 2.7 acres. Mr. Kuker stated that was the original drawing, but the City stated they would rather have two 2 '/z acre lots. Mr. Bednarz stated the new proposal took the property line out to the south of the property so that both of the properties were 2 ' /2 acres in size. He stated there was a simple error initially in the square footage and a notation on the plan was not changed to indicate that change, both lots are 2'/2 acres in size. Commissioner Gamache questioned if the property lines would be straight. Mr. Bednarz stated that they would not be straight. Commissioner Greenwald stated that as long as staff felt they met the conditions of the • resolution, there would be no reason not to make a motion to approve this. Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Gamache, to recommend to the City Council approval of the lot split request in the form of Resolution No. _. Motion carried on a 7- ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the May 7, 2002 City Council meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: RESIDENTIAL SKETCH PLAN REVIEW TO CREATE 16 URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOTS ON PROPER TY LOCA TED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF HANSON BOULEVARD AND COUNTY ROAD 20 (161 AVENUE N99 FOR PENTA MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. Mr. Bednarz explained that the applicant is seeking approval of 16 proposed lots located at the southeast corner of Hanson Blvd and County Road 20. Staff had worked with property owners to the east to establish a scenario he is comfortable with. He stated they explored a through street that would eliminate the north cul -de -sac. The third scenario had four lots fronting on Crane Street. He stated they had looked at all the options they could identify for the property to the east and the applicant and the owner of the property to east are comfortable with the cul -de -sac design. He stated there might be some slight • adjustments to that as they go through the sketch plan process for that property but it appears the development there could be accommodated. As regards to the property to the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 Page 4 south; the only access to this property would be through the proposed sketch. Existing houses on the south end of the property, the County road intersection to the west and also existing development to the east eliminate other options. Extending the cul -de -sac to the south is the only feasible way to develop this property. Mr. Bednarz showed a map where the subject property was located. He stated the proposal would be to bring the extension of 160 Avenue into the development and have a cul -de -sac on the north end, a temporary cul -de -sac on the south end and eventually this could continue to the south. He stated an outlot was proposed on the southwest comer of the plat that was intended to be preserved to add to a property to the south to aid the lot width of a future plot plan to the south. Mr. Bednarz stated that staff, in looking at what the dimensions of the lots could be, believe that it was possible to achieve an eight lot design on the south property without the outlot being necessary. He stated the outlot is not buildable and they do have a provision in Ordinance 10 that prohibits unbuildable lots that do not meet the minimum lot requirements from being created. He stated Staff was recommending the area from Outlot A be added specificalyto Lot 10 which narrows through the area where a building pad would be located and possibly spreading the remainder of that through the narrow lots on the west side of the development. • Commissioner Kirchoff asked if he meant taking Outlot A and putting it with 10 or • should it be 12. Mr. Bednarz stated Lot 10 needs the most additional width, Lot 12 is sufficiently wide to support a decent building pad, Lot 10 because it narrows, as you get deeper into the lot, may encounter come difficulty in a three -car garage scenario or some of the larger houses being built throughout the community. He stated they were recommending some additional width be provided from Outlot A to Lot 10 and some could be spread throughout the other lots as well. Commissioner Daninger asked what the length of the temporary cul -de -sac was going to the south. Mr. Bednarz stated he would need to check the number and it was in the staff report. Chairman Squires stated it was 870 feet and if it was all the way to the edge of the property line. Mr. Bednarz stated it was measured to the end of the future permanent cul- de -sac. Commissioner Hedin asked if it would require a variance on that cul -de -sac. Mr. Bednarz stated both cul -de -sacs, as proposed, would be longer than five hundred feet in length from that connecting street, so both cul -de -sacs would require a variance to that requirement. Commissioner Hedin asked why the street was not put all the way through to the south so they did not have a variance on that. Mr. Bednarz stated he was not involved in the • review of the Chesterton Commons North plat but one of the considerations was the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 . Page 5 ownership of the property and it was platted under different ownership through a different proposal. Unfortunately, at the time the proposed lots fronting on 159' Avenue were approved, the potential for access to 159"' was eliminated. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if there were houses along 159"'. Mr. Bednarz stated he was correct. Commissioner Falk asked what the lot width was of Lot 10. Mr. Bednarz stated the lot width met the eighty -foot width requirement at the setback line. He stated staff s concern was the angle of the property reduces the width as they move further into the lot. He stated typically they would have a cul -de -sac lot where it would be pie shaped and would continue to get wider as it went back, this was the reverse of that where it gets more narrow and he thought when they take only one measurement at the setback line of eighty feet, that provision doesn't really consider this scenario. Commissioner Falk asked how much room would be left for the back of the house. Mr. Bednarz stated it was going to be tighter as they went farther back and that is why they were recommending it be widened with the area from Outlot A. Chairman Squires asked if the City Ordinances allow them to approve lots as part of a platting process that is unbuildable. Mr. Bednarz stated that it does not. Chairman Squires asked how they would handle Lots 9 and 10 as this request goes through the process and they do not know weather those lots would be buildable. Due to the amount of fill that would be necessary Mr. Bednarz stated the step that needed to be taken was the Watershed Management Organization review of the plat and to determine whether or not they would be able to fill as indicated on the sketch. That would come back with the detailed grating, drainage and erosion control plan and have an answer to this question at the preliminary plat stage. Commissioner Greenwald stated they were looking at the fact that they may need to cut the lots down and eliminate a lot or two to make that outlot. Commissioner Greenwald stated the configuration is what they were looking at. Mr. Bednarz stated this was correct and they had put the applicant on notice as to what the steps would be to move the sketch forward as proposed with review by the Watershed Management Organization. Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Hedin, to open the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Mike Quigley, representing Penta Development, stated moving 160' to the north to eliminate 80 feet would not work because there were lots platted all along 160' right to the property line, with homes on them. Commissioner Daninger asked about the area farther to the west. He wondered if the lot . line could be curved to the north. Mr. Quigley stated they could not meet the radiuses of Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 Page 6 the City's street requirements. Mr. Quigley stated in response to Outlot A, he received • the staff report and they left the outlot there strictly to accommodate the development to the south. He stated information he received from staff stated they believed that could be accommodated with the removal of the Outlot And he stated they did not have any problems with that and he concurred with the recommendation to add that to Lot 10. Mr. Quigley stated in regards to the wetland fill areas on Lots 9 and 10, those two areas were not a natural wetland, those were manmade ponds. He stated they had preliminary discussions with the Watershed District and they did not anticipate any problems because they were not a natural wetland. Mr. Alan Theise stated he was the property owner to the south. He stated when they bought the property they were told they would be able to sell it to a developer. He wanted to make sure their rights were intact and they would be able to sell the property to a developer, still have access to 160 and still be able to get out. He stated they were concerned that they would not be able to sell their property because the County would not allow them access to Hanson. He stated this was the first time they had seen that plat and noted they had provided access to his property. He stated that was the reason they were there was to protect their rights. He stated they had lived on the property for eight years and he did see the owner dig this out farther, but there are wetlands in there with cattails. His concern was if that would be replaced somewhere else in the County. He wanted to know if there was a law that stated if a wetland was filled in, it had to be replaced • somewhere else. Chairman Squires stated this law was administrated by the Coon Creek Watershed District and they make the decision as to whether State law requires the replacement or not. Commissioner Greenwald asked Mr. Bednarz where Mr. Theise lived. Mr. Bednarz used a map to show where they lived. Commissioner Gamache asked if Mr. Theise's driveway went out to Hanson Boulevard. Mr. Theise stated his driveway did go to the County Road. Commissioner Hedin asked if he was comfortable with the plans. Mr. Theise stated he was very comfortable that they would have access to get out, so they could sell their property and not lose value or be landlocked and not able to sell their property to a developer. Commissioner Falk stated he would not have access to Hanson; they would go right to the cul -de -sac. Mr. Theise stated this was correct. Motion by Falk, seconded by Daninger, to close the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Commissioner Falk asked if there were any existing easements on the property. Mr. Bednarz stated there are easements or rights -of -way for Hanson Boulevard and County Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 • Page 7 Road 20. He stated they would be looking at additional right -of -way for County Road 20 and they would be establishing easements on each of the individual lots. Commissioner Greenwald asked what variances would they need to give. Mr. Bednarz stated they did look at this very closely to make sure the lots will meet the minimums if they say they would at this phase. Staff was confident they would meet all the minimum width and area requirements and he did not see any additional variances for the lots. He stated they would not be recommending variances for lots if they did come up at the preliminary plat level. Therefore the only variances within the plat are for the length of the 2 cul -de -sacs. Chairman Squires stated they had approved longer cul -de -sacs in the past with the preliminary plat. He stated in the first instance, it becomes more difficult when there is development around the area and their alternatives are severely limited by the existing road network that had been established and the problem of the wetlands around them. He stated there were not a lot of alternatives to cul -de -sacs of some sort. Commissioner Daninger asked if they had ever requested a wider street for emergency vehicles. Mr. Bednarz stated Ordinance 10 provides the standards for streets as far as rights -of -way as well as the actual paved surface of the roadway and they are under different classifications from a local roadway to a collector street to an arterial street. For • a local street they look for a sixty -foot wide right -of -way and a thirty -three foot street between curbs. He stated this provides for parking on both sides of the street and two travel lanes with plenty of width for an emergency vehicle to get in or out. The cul -de- sac with a 120 foot diameter right -of -way in approximately a ninety -three foot wide paved surface provides plenty of room for an emergency vehicle to turn around. Motion by Falk, seconded by Gamache, to recommend to the City Council approval of Resolution No. , approving the sketch plan as prepared by staff. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Chairman Squires stated this is not a technical formal approval. Mr. Bednarz stated they would make sure to keep the adjacent property owners in the loop when they get to the preliminary plat stage. He stated that would be when they would have the detailed information and a good sense of how it would lay out. Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the May 7, 2002 City Council meeting. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 Page 8 • PUBLICHEARING: REVIEW THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS STUDY PREPARED TO EVALUATE THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT FOR VARIOUS PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF ANDOVER. Mr. Neumeister explained that the applicant was seeking approval of the neighborhood business study to evaluate the neighborhood business- zoning district for various properties throughout the City. He stated that at the last meeting there was discussion that there was a need to provide a buffer to the surrounding residential areas and one of the thoughts staff had was they needed to establish a land use category of limited commercial which would establish an office park to act as a buffer in certain areas. He stated along the same lines, there were some sites that seemed appropriate to designate with a dual land use designation. Mr. Neumeister stated the third item discussed was some places in the ordinance in limited business that they needed to make some changes to remove the words "service stations" and "24 hour continuous operations" as special uses in the limited business zoning districts. He stated the fourth item discussed had to do with sites that were currently zoned as neighborhood business district that already had service stations and they did not want to put them out of business or make them a non - conforming use. What they would suggest was that this become a special use permit in the neighborhood zoning district a minimum two -acre lot size. He stated the fifth item discussed various • adjustments to the whole body of the report talking about land use and zoning recommendations. Chairman Squires stated since it was a public hearing they should run through the geographic location of the sites on the map and then summarize the recommendation on each of the sites. This would give everyone a sense of what is on the table. Mr. Neumeister stated site A -1, was 5.5 acres and site A -2 was 5.2 acres. He stated the recommendation of the study was the development of sites A -1 and A -2 with commercial uses might present land use compatibility challenges based upon their physical characteristics, traffic generation, and surrounding land uses. He stated in order to address compatibility with the surrounding residential uses, the City may consider re- designating the sites for dual land use designations on a given piece of property. A medium density residential land use would serve to buffer the existing residential uses to the east from traffic on Hanson Boulevard and planned intensive commercial uses to the west as encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan's stated objectives. Mr. Neumeister stated that site B -1 was 1.6 acres and site B -2 was 1.4 acres. He stated the recommendation would be that the general location, utilities, and access for development of Sites B -1 and B -2 with neighborhood commercial uses had been planned for as part of the approval of the Grey Oaks subdivision. He stated no change to the Land Use map or Zoning Map designations for Sites B -1 and B -2 were recommended. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 • Page 9 Mr. Neumeister explained that site C -1 was 2.8 Acres in size and the recommendation was the area surrounding Site C -1 had developed with an urban single - family character. The introduction of a commercial use on this site could be incompatible within this area due to its existing character and lack of physical features to create a transition. Staff recommended that the Land Use Plan be amended to designate Site C -1 for Urban Residential Medium Density Use to ensure full utilization of the site, provided that the site design provides proper orientation and transition to the adjacent single - family residences. Overall density should be near the lower end of range prescribed by the Comprehensive Plan for medium density uses and developed under the City's M -1 Multiple Dwelling Low Density Zoning District to ensure compatibility. The site could be designated URL and allow the zoning to remain R -4. Mr. Neumeister stated site D -1 was 5.2 Acres in size. He stated the development potential of Site D -1 was severely limited due to the large wetland area adjacent to the property and design of streets serving the property. Development of a commercial use on the property was not recommended given the residential character of the area immediately to the west and access issues related to streets serving the property. Mr. Neumeister stated the proximity of neighborhood commercial and general commercial uses limited the market for commercial use of Site D -1 because of business interchange within a larger commercial node or business interception of patrons traveling • on Bunker Lake Boulevard or north on Crosstown Boulevard. The City should amend the Land Use map to designate the property for Urban Residential Medium Density Land Uses and rezone the property to a M -2, Multiple Dwelling District. Mr. Neumeister stated that site E -1 was 5.4 Acres in size. He stated that with planned extension of sanitary sewer and water service, Site E -1 would be prime for development. Planned development of low and medium density residential land uses to the north and east of Site E -1 would create market demand for Neighborhood Business uses intended to service the immediate area, as well as traffic going farther north on 7 Avenue. Mr. Neumeister stated that site F -1 was 7.0 acres in size. He stated there should be no change in land use designation or zoning district. Mr. Neumeister stated site G -1 was .86 acres in size and the recommendation was a change to the zoning ordinance, to add language that would limit the Special Use of "service stations" in the Neighborhood Business district to only sites that were two acres or larger in size. There are a few existing service /fuel stations in the Neighborhood Business district that would be non - conforming if the special use were removed entirely from Neighborhood Business. The addition of the two -acre minimum would prevent site G -1 from becoming a service /fuel station and still allow the existing ones to remain conforming. • Commissioner Greenwald asked if the neighborhood commercial vs. neighborhood business ever mixed. Chairman Squires stated neighborhood commercial is the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —April 9, 2002 Page 10 • Comprehensive Plan designation and the neighborhood business is the zoning map designation so they are in two different documents and they would never cross over. Commissioner Greenwald asked what could they put on Site B. Mr. Bednarz stated it was important to note the City owned this property and it has a significant amount of wetland on it. He stated any type of development there would be limited and would take a pretty extensive watershed review. Chairman Squires stated he did not see them putting anything on the site because he did not see any developable property. Mr. Bednarz stated the most they would see there would be some type of public utility structure. Commissioner Greenwald explained that the recommendation on this neighborhood business district site was to go from neighborhood commercial to urban residential. Mr. Neumeister stated that was correct. Commissioner Greenwald asked if they changed it to public, could this be a public park. Mr. Bednarz stated that it could be considered for that, because the lot was not consid developable. Commissioner Greenwald asked about the economic development potential. Mr. Neumeister stated the land use guiding should not depend on economics. In this case, • there is very little that can be done with the property. Mr. Neumeister stated there was a question brought up at a previous meeting about the surrounding communities and what commercial areas existed there. He stated they had prepared a map that showed a two -mile radius around Andover. Mr. Neumeister showed a map of the different commercial areas in Andover. Commissioner Hedin asked what category were industrial parks. Mr. Neumeister stated they did not show that on the map because it was its own designation. Chairman Squires asked if item four in the staff summary suggested that the proposal was to amend the zoning ordinance to exclude service stations as special uses in the Neighborhood Business zone. He stated that when he looked at page eight of the report, it appeared the recommendation was to allow them in the Neighborhood Business zone as a conditional rather than a permitted use providing that they were two acres in size or larger. Mr. Neumeister stated that he was suggesting they still leave retail trade and services as a use under the permitted category, but take out service/fuel stations from the definition at least in that they highlight for this particular zoning district that they would not allow fueUservice stations because they cannot change the definition that is currently including them. So, if they took it out for all of them and then make it a special use, provided the site was two acres or larger, it would allow the City to fit existing uses 40 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 • Page 11 within the existing districts and not make them nonconforming. He stated this was the only logical way of doing what is needed. Chairman Squires stated they had a meeting with the City Council and came to a general consensus and the direction from the Council was they should be decreasing the intensity of neighborhood business areas that they have currently. Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Kirchoff, to open the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Mr. Dave Harris, Creekside Homes, stated he was there regarding the property that was located on 141 s ` and Crosstown. He stated the property was not 2.8 acres as written, it was 3.98 acres. He stated the lot width would be the portion that was the widest and the widest fronts on Crosstown. He stated the width should be five hundred feet plus, and the depth should be the narrow part going back from Crosstown. He stated those numbers did not work with the project. He stated he was proposing with the owner to build 32 townhomes. Commissioner Greenwald asked if the width or the depth changed. Mr. Harris stated that the width was a little wider and the depth was also a little wider if they reversed the two. He stated if would be about 173,000 square feet. • Chairman Squires stated the width and depth dimensions were pretty close and someone just made an error in computing the acreage. Mr. Harris stated he thought it was a little bigger than what was stated. Chairman Squires stated he did not think this would materially change the decision being made. Commissioner Greenwald asked Mr. Harris if he came to the public hearing to make that correction and to say that his plans fit with the plan change. Mr. Harris stated he had a purchase agreement with the property owner and identified his intention to build town homes on the site. He stated he had two neighborhood meetings and thought that nearly all of the people would like to see town homes in lieu of commercial on the property. He stated zoning it for single - family under R -4 would make it difficult because the lots would be in excess of $100,000 apiece to build and he did not think they would sell at that number. Mr. Bednarz stated that it was important to note in response to the neighborhood meeting, the majority would like to see residential versus commercial on the site but there was still work to be done. Secondly, to rezone the property to R -4 would be appropriate even in a scenario where they would entertain a townhouse development because of the process they have. To rezone the property to an M -1 or M -2, which are the medium density districts, the City enters into a contract with the developer that specifies the specifics of the development. He stated they typically do not zone the property to M -1 or M -2 until they have a development they are comfortable with and they can enter into a contract with the developer on how it would be developed. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 Page 12 • Chairman Squires stated if they had the two options of R -4 or M -1 and Mr. Harris was in the process of development there might be an opportunity to coordinate that. Mr. Bednarz stated they would have a public hearing for the rezoning as a separate item. Motion by Daninger, seconded by Hedin, to close the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Commissioner Daninger stated that from the workshop, one of the things they wanted to see was the chart and he agreed with staffs recommendation. He stated the consultant gave two recommendations and it appeared that they picked one. . Commissioner Gamache asked if it was brought up that there might be other areas in the City that were not identified and they might want to look at. Mr. Neumeister stated he was referring to the rural business. He stated the consensus of the staff was that as those areas mature and develop, there could be a comprehensive plan amendment and then ultimately a rezoning to the proper category at that time. Mr. Bednarz stated that when they look at the areas that are undeveloped now and potentially could have a commercial site in the future, it is a question of timing as to when those areas are identified. At this point, the staff position was that there was some pretty large undefined, undeveloped land and the transportation system and future improvements are a question as well as how roads would be brought to these areas. It is • Staff's opinion that it is too early to put designations out there in an undefined rural area. The Chairman asked that staff bring back the land use and zoning changes for the May 14 Planning Commission meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER AMENDING ORDINANCE 8. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD ADD OFF -SALE LIQUOR STORES ASA SPECL4L USE TO SECTION 7.03 OF ORDINANCE 8 AND ESTABLISH CRITERIA THAT WOULD ESTABLISH THENUMBER OFLIQUOR LICENSESALLOWED IN THE CITY, THE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT OFF -SALE LIQUOR STORES WOULD BE ALLOWED TO LOCATE IN, AND ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE MINIMUM SIZE AND VALUATION FOR THIS TYPE OF USE Mr. Neumeister explained that the EDA discussed the issue of off -sale liquor licenses. Direction was given for the staff to prepare information for the Planning Commission to discuss establishing criteria for issuance of new off -sale liquor licenses. Mr. Neumeister stated there was some research done by the City Clerk that showed other cities and how they regulated it. He stated some cities regulate it by so many licenses per many thousands of residents. Other cities set up a radius restriction. He stated each city has a little different approach as to how they are handling this and it is not regulated. Mr. Neumeister stated that the there were five criteria being proposed for the off -sale • liquor license. The first criteria was a minimum size of a liquor store for a tenant space Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 • Page 13 in a retail shopping center should be 3,000 square feet. The second criteria was a minimum size of a liquor store for a freestanding building should be 15,000 square feet. The third criteria was the minimum per square foot valuation of the shell and interior finished for either a tenant in a multi -tenant building or a free - standing building shall be no less that $57 per square foot. The fourth criteria was the architectural quality and materials for these buildings shall adhere to five standards. Mr. Neumeister read the standards and the fifth criteria was signs may not be attached to or painted on windows with the exception of open hours signage. Chairman Squires stated the number of licenses would be a change to Ordinance 235. He asked where the six came from. Mr. Neumeister stated it was basically some general conversation that the City had two liquor stores already and two more going in to the WDE site and the Andover Station site would still allow two more in the future. Commissioner Greenwald stated there were a couple of statements he needed some clarification on from the EDA meeting. He stated Councilmember Orttel stated, "if the Planning Commission had a problem with this, they could have a deed restriction, this would not be an ordinance correction." He stated a response shortly after that was in regard to the dollar valuation of square foot minimum. He noted that the only city surveyed that had that was Chanhassen, which has so many liquor stores and super markets and he felt that was not a good comparison to Andover. He stated Mr. • Neumeister's statement was "City Attorney had indicated the cities by law were allowed a great deal of discretion on setting their liquor license including the dollar valuation or square foot minimum. He indicated that they should deal with existing ones by grand fathering them in but if the existing ones wanted to upgrade they would need to upgrade their current standards." He asked if an addition would cause a need to upgrade? Mr. Neumeister responded "Yes it would ". Commissioner Greenwald stated that later on Councilmember Jacobson stated and he agreed with this "he would like the Planning and Zoning Commission to really think this over and not just rely on the EDA's recommendation." Commissioner Greenwald stated he was not at this meeting and asked what the thinking was at that point. Mr. Neumeister stated recalled that the EDA wanted to know from the Planning Commission if this was the right tact to take, if they were or were not in agreement with setting a valuation, setting minimums, the numbers. And, they did not want their discussion to taint the Planning Commission's discussion. Commissioner Greenwald stated he would like to see a lot more into this before they make any specific changes in valuation, numbers or anything. Chairman Squires asked what more he would like to see regarding this and if he would want more study. Commissioner Greenwald stated according to the EDA the only city that had a minimum valuation was Chanhassen and in his opinion, it was not a good • comparison to Andover. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 Page 14 • Commissioner Greenwald asked the reason this was brought to the table. Commissioner Kirchoff stated there was not a limit to the number of liquor stores there could be in the City. Mr. Neumeister confirmed this. Commissioner Hedin stated that out of the three points, he had a problem with the first two. He stated they addressed any problems they had nicely. He stated he was against limiting the number of liquor stores in the City. He stated they should let the market decide how many Andover can support. Commissioner Gamache asked if they want to pigeonhole themselves into a number like six or seven. He noted that as the community grows, when they have six, the market may bear eight liquor stores fifteen years from now. Then they would be back trying to expand it again. Commissioner Hedin stated they were creating a monopoly for the two they already have and the one going into Andover Station. He stated they should not make any changes at this time. Commissioner Daninger asked if they had any other specific business that they put those types of restrictions on, not the limit because he stated supply equals demand. He stated • there were reasons to limit it so there would not potentially be a liquor store everywhere. He stated his question was if there are other specific retail stores they had done this to beside liquor stores. Mr. Neumeister stated there were none as far as he knew. Chairman Squires stated he did not see the rationale for imposing different building construction standards on liquor stores versus other businesses. He stated he did support the limit on the number of licenses for liquor stores. He stated it was very common for cities to impose limitations on the number to be able to control them. He stated that by having a number they avoid the situation of being unpleasantly surprised by what happens when there is no number. Commissioner Falk stated he agreed with that. He would like to see a number there to combat the problem and head it off as much as possible in the future. Commissioner Daninger asked how many. Chairman Squires stated they should start with six. Commissioner Hedin suggested they establish a license based on the population instead of a number. Commissioner Gamache stated he thought that made sense. He stated by doing it this way, it would not need to be looked at again in the future, the number would increase with the number in population. Commissioner Greenwald stated they could also do this by a radius restriction, which . would really restrict it. Commissioner Hedin stated that they could see a liquor store on Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 • Page 15 one corner and a specialty wine store on another corner. Commissioner Greenwald stated that was why he was against the minimum requirements. Commissioner Kirchoff asked what the cost of a liquor license was per year. Mr. Neumeister stated the cost was $200.00 per year. Commissioner Daninger stated he wanted to make sure there was enough room for growth and allow for them to be able to reevaluate or adjust it in the future. Chairman Squires stated it was also important not to be surprised. Commissioner Greenwald stated he was in agreement with Commissioner Daninger, that this should be based on the number of people. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if there was a limit or a size restriction on any other business. Mr. Bednarz stated that there was none specifically. He did not believe there was a specific standard for a minimum size for a commercial building. Chairman Squires asked if off -sale liquor was only allowed in the SC and GB zones now or was it a recommendation sta w as making. Mr. Neumeister stated it was only a recommendation and there was no distinction between off -sale and on -sale in the ordinance. • Chairman Squires proposed they adopt a standard that would grant one license per six thousand residents based on the most recent census, that they accept staff's recommendation to make off -sale establishments special uses in the SC and GB zones, but that they not go with the recommendation to have special valuation or architectural standards that apply only to liquor stores. Commissioner Greenwald asked if the most recent census meant every ten years. Chairman Squires stated he would change this to current population. Chairman Squires asked if there was a way to calculate the current population between that period. Mr. Bednarz stated there was. Commissioner Hedin stated he was still against the limit on the number. Commissioner Greenwald stated he was against this also. Commissioner Hedin stated he was against the number, either population or strict number, and was also against limiting it just to the SC and GB zones. He stated the Council had a lot of power through the special use permit to determine weather they want the liquor stores or not. Commissioner Hedin asked why they needed to put a limit on the number when the City Attorney stated that there was not a problem if they had one more. Chairman Squires stated they could rely on the opinion of the City Attorney but it was not a legal opinion, it was the opinion of one person. 11 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 Page 16 • Commissioner Gamache stated that if they do not limit it, they couldn't tam down a liquor license for no reason. Commissioner Hedin stated that through the special use permit process, they would not get ten applications at one time. If they would get up to five or six, then they could revisit this if they felt there was a need for more in the City. Commissioner Falk asked why not do this now instead of coming to that point. Commissioner Hedin asked why the City should limit it to five or six places now if someone has a good place to put one in the future. Commissioner Gamache stated they could always change that number later, but if they do not have that number now, they open themselves up to a liquor store on every comer. The City Council does not have grounds to deny the special use permit just because they feel they have too many liquor stores in the City already; that is not grounds to deny the permit. Commissioner Greenwald asked if they were allowed to do a municipal liquor license in the City at this time. Mr. Neumeister stated there was some discussion regarding this but he did not recall what that was. Commissioner Hedin stated he believed that if they had a municipal liquor store, the City would have to outlaw all other liquor stores. Chairman Squires stated he would like staff to propose architectural standards that uniformly apply to all businesses. Mr. Neumeister stated that they could do that and they • already have it, but it is worded in the negative way. Commissioner Hedin asked if they already had this, why would they need a duplicate copy in that part of the ordinance. Mr. Neumeister stated they have it in the purpose statement of visual standards 8.20. Commissioner Hedin stated this did not only apply to liquor stores, this applied to all businesses. Chairman Squires stated his proposal again. Commissioner Falk asked where Chairman Squires came up with the number of 6,000. Chairman Squires stated it is between the Blaine and Ham Lake numbers. Commissioner Greenwald stated he would rather see fifty citizen fighting a special use permit for another liquor store because a citizen has a voice and they are taking the voice away. He stated that is not right and is why he did not think there should be a limit at all on the number based upon residence. Chairman Squires asked how many commissioners supported the proposal, four agreed, three disagreed. Commissioner Daninger stated this discussion should give guidance to the City Council to explore ideas and the Commission has done its job. • Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 9, 2002 Page 17 OTHER BUSINESS. Mr. Bednarz mentioned the variance for the front yard setback for Kurt Dahlman. There was a question about whether the building code or the zoning ordinance regulated the expansion of that structure. He stated staff took the position that it was the building code. He stated he needed to correct that statement, the section that would limit that expansion comes from the zoning ordinance and is a section that limits structural alterations. Chairman Squires stated that there was not anything in the building code. Mr. Bednarz stated they still need a building permit but the building code specifically would not prohibit that, it is the zoning ordinance. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if they were able to move forward with that and make the addition. Mr. Bednarz stated they were still working out the details with the County about the vacation of the easement. He stated they had not heard the final word from the County Board on that issue, but it looked positive. Mr. Neumeister stated they would not have a meeting on the April 23, 2002 because they did not have any other business on the agenda. • ADJOURNMENT. Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Gamache, to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Respectfully Submitted, Sue Osbeck, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • i • CITY OF ANDOVER 0) 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Planneqv SUBJECT: Variance (02 -04) — Variance to Ordinance No. 8, Section 4.21 Fences and Walls to increase fence height in front yard setback for proposed fence at 15672 Kiowa Street NW for John Dalos. DATE: May 14, 2002 INTRODUCTION The applicant is planning to construct a perimeter fence around his property. The proposed fence would be an aluminum (similar to wrought iron) fence that would be five feet in height. C� DISCUSSION The proposed fence would be constructed along the rear and side property lines. They plan to place it behind an existing row of mature evergreen trees in the front yard (see attached photo). Ordinance No. 8, Section 4.21 Fences and Walls restricts the height of fences located within the front yard setback to a maximum height of four feet. The intent of this ordinance is to prevent fences from adversely affecting traffic visibility from streets or driveways on the same block. This ordinance provision is also intended to protect the aesthetics of the front yard and front elevations of homes from being screened behind a taller, opaque fence. As with all variances, the applicant must substantiate hardship and demonstrate that the variance would not be contrary to the intent of the ordinance. The applicant has included a letter for this purpose. The specific findings of fact that must be addressed are provided by State Statute, and are listed below: 1. There are circumstances unique to the property that were not created by the landowner. . Unique conditions may include the physical characteristics, including topography or water conditions that may exist on the property. I • 2. The property, if the variance is granted, will not be out of character with other properties in the same neighborhood. 3. The applicant has exhausted all reasonable possibilities for using his/her property or combining a substandard lot due to size, shape or lot line dimensions, with an adjacent vacant lot. 4. Economic considerations may not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists with application of the minimum standards of this chapter. Staff Recommendation Staff does not believe that the applicant has demonstrated that hardship would result to the property owner if the ordinance is strictly enforced and is not recommending approval of this request. Attachments Proposed Resolution Location Map • Photographs of property Applicant's letter Mailing list Letter in Opposition ACTION REQUIRED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval or denial of the variance request. Res ect ly submitted, 7Ye adz` Cc: John Dalos, 15672 Kiowa Street NW • -2- • CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR JOHN DALOS TO INCREASE THE FENCE HEIGHT WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM FOUR TO FIVE FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15672 KIOWA STREET NW. WHEREAS, John Dalos has petitioned to vary from the maximum fence height requirement within the front yard setback as described in Ordinance 8, Section 4.21, for property located at 15672 Kiowa Street NW legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 4 RUM RIVER FOREST, Anoka County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the applicant has not demonstrated hardship would be incurred through strict enforcement of the ordinance, and; WHEREAS, Ordinance 8, Section 4.2 1, provides a maximum fence height of four feet within front yard setbacks for all residential lots throughout the City, and; WHEREAS, the applicant has other feasible options to locate the fence; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover denies the proposed variance request. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this th day of , 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk —3 l John Dalos Variance to Fence Height in Front Yard nee .m ws .m wv v K � ww ww ww a w9 ° war ww a. wn � � ,ww w , w W 8 a W • a 9n m � oleo w�9 y p 3 9 H .n9 ww wow w ».e eau wv wore w wn ,� .em .oie am ..m mw fi WW W W W W - Q wx rr9 wro iem .eem >ve w.N w inn m., ata ., rom .mo wn wm ne inn ua ' ieno a „ '°m / Tv w'o wrn wm ti m,o mn Inm Iw01 r6R0 ,nn arN nM..c ww. ue» 16 .mA wn� '� M ww �w9 wwr `fO 911 M tW wer 'mv mm t we. ww mw am .a ' 0ie �' >m w , w 9m Iww .19/ IOaO .IR wro an m � �mv imn ar wA¢ um ®t wme w.e 91e .ea � the am j mw a9 na 9 i Project Location Map / ` ■ NN W City of Andover Planning Department —4- 10 12 " � � .we ate elm wo wm »w ei16 em .ae of ww wa6 Ie1A InA mm .we K w, ww inm ww cal• romr ..n n �eom w .em <m m woee W v > vev W1t vaa .wt wa vn v9 � .nl .Nl nA .116 mm .mt t116 IwR YW � em nip .Yw i Project Location Map / ` ■ NN W City of Andover Planning Department —4- e . A hardship must be present in order for a variance to be granted. Ordinance 8, Section 5.04 defines a hardship as follows: " Where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this Ordinance, an appeal may be made and a variance granted. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property owner." Specific Hardship: Due to the lay of the land - drainage ditch will cause approx. 90% of the fence to be below 4ft. High at road level - 5ft. Fence will bring to approx. a Oft. Height at road level, also will conform with 5ft. Height fence to be installed on other 3 sides. If owner meets 40ft. Setback it will deny reasonable use of approx. 16,520 sq. ft. of property. A 5ft. Ornamental Iron fence has one more stabilizing bar to help with stand the impact of winter snow plowing. Owner is a police office with the Metropolitan Airport Commission and has applied for an F.A.A. Explosive Detection K -9. A uniform 5ft. High fence will make for a safer and more secure environment for the K -9 as well as for the community. • • r Current Resident . Current Resident Current Resident St. 15710 Kiowa St. 15721 Makah St. a Makah ver, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 15701 Makah Cir. 15700 Kiowa St. 15701 Kiowa St. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 15731 Makah St. 15684 Potawatomi St. 15673 Kiowa St. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 15672 Kiowa St. 15671 Potawatomi St. 15629 Kiowa St. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 15628 Potawatomi St. 15621 Potawatomi St. 15620 Kiowa St. O ver, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 15577 Kiowa St. 15571 Potawatomi St. 15719 Potawatomi St. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 15566 Kiowa St. 15730 Kiowa St. 15721 Kiowa St Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 is 7 1 11 F la, 1)4 z 45 a"Ovol c 17, 6P)O V e-r, - 9�7- ,07 x reqo,rd-5 to Pctlev5 Vez-riq-,. e- - ro lf'11�11 -tl b Oe-c,-t c2lii e -e.5 17 ev e-e /a/ ep j;i /,y c- 11.�r 7"r t-o- --e-- S r ee,,�,5 -w /;v cur .\Vie w wee- v et 0 _ ff- V& 9( TO: FROM: Planning and Zoning Commissioners Courtney Bednarz, City Plann wV SUBJECT: Variance (02 -04) — Variance to ordinance No. 8, Section 6.02 Minimum District Provisions for reduction of side yard setback for proposed detached accessory building located at 1735 148 Lane NW — Richard Wagner. DATE: May 14, 2002 INTRODUCTION The applicant has requested that this item be tabled until the City has completed its review of the regulations concerning accessory structures. • DISCUSSION At the May 28, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, staff will bring forward an ordinance amendment for accessory structures that addresses concerns expressed by the City Council during their goal setting meetings. ACTION REQUIRED Please table this item to the June 11' Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Depending upon the outcome of potential ordinance changes, this application will either be withdrawn or considered at that time. Attachments Location Map Res ectfully submi d, v �.,� ou 5y l • Cc: Richard Wagner, 1735 148' Lane NW CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CLANDOVER.MN.US t ti Richard Wagner • Variance to Side Yard Setback 15260 1— N W z Z 16211 15212 1, Z 1949 19 I 1901 I185311831I 1813 I 1785 1685 ME] 15026 14950 15245 1918 7408 a 1 /8TH W 357 upa S F lb'M 15218 371 146 1385 P� 0 138D � 1 MOTH AVE 1970 1977 J 14788 m q o r 382 CO 519 7388 Z NA 1424 151 0 ' u» �. 151 1410 15176 1879 14769 141°0 tm, 1� 14 1410 O B 8 1» tnp 51 14722 Z 147TH CT r 51 1367 Q z 1920 N Z 51 = O 870 15150 NW y 14688 �-- 151 X1 41 1d676 51 15140 e F r N � ME] 15026 14950 tRN 14853 1386 ..__ 1380 \14784 \ � 14756 n Z S 1541 K id a�i $ S 2 v 'wn i^5 0 145... w � 48tH uw Y Q um 1 5S tanl s uw tar W ur two uw 1340 NfW ra m � rr » MOO 1401 Nm6 taw rapt tpx tar tam tape 1+x1 ur tar lam 0 Hr xr Nxl 14W S N lar � 1428 � 14m 13 ga pp pp v� »n 1342 1412 1 144TH. AVE 4 AAA • Project Location Map 1900 q l N w� `e 9 City of Andover Planning Department 1869 1918 a 1 /8TH W upa S F lb'M 146 B S F� F�® 6 tpa MOTH AVE 1970 1920 14788 m q o r u» < 14M F ® E 14744 ' u» �. Q J 1869 1879 14769 141°0 tm, 1� 14 1410 O B 8 1» tnp 14722 m 147TH CT r 1718 4 Maur lm z 1920 N Z 14719 14712 110 14 74 urea 1d771 1M O 870 NW y 14688 �-- 1d676 e F r Q 14670 14669 14852 1 661 lab V 1989 g v ua 11640 14620 74878 lxp ro w lxla m 1673 ti uw F 146TH AVE BTHAV u» rntw, lar la» 7 4570 14568 ur um p m 14610 14589 1860 H taw n® 14r �j tar law taw Nl m p 14520 R 3 e5 Y 1748 ` r� 1718 m 1850 tRN 14853 1386 ..__ 1380 \14784 \ � 14756 n Z S 1541 K id a�i $ S 2 v 'wn i^5 0 145... w � 48tH uw Y Q um 1 5S tanl s uw tar W ur two uw 1340 NfW ra m � rr » MOO 1401 Nm6 taw rapt tpx tar tam tape 1+x1 ur tar lam 0 Hr xr Nxl 14W S N lar � 1428 � 14m 13 ga pp pp v� »n 1342 1412 1 144TH. AVE 4 AAA • Project Location Map 1900 q l N w� `e 9 City of Andover Planning Department CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Plannar SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Foxburgh Crossing Residential Sketch Plan for single family urban residential and townhouse project to be known as `Foxburg Crossing' proposed to be located at the northwest corner of Hanson Boulevard and Andover Boulevard. DATE: May 14, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission is asked to review a sketch plan for `Foxburgh Crossing', an urban residential development containing 12 single family lots and four townhouse units. The sketch plan has been revised several times since originally proposed as a detached townhouse development to reduce the number of units and address the concerns of residents, the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Review Criteria Ordinance 10, Section 6 outlines the requirements for sketch plan review. The Planning Commission is asked to informally advise the subdivider -of the extent to which the plan conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, design standards of city, county, state and federal agencies and possible modification necessary to secure approval of the plan. Submission of a sketch plan does not constitute formal filing of a plat. DISCUSSION Two options for the development of the subject properties have been identified. The first option would allow planned unit development review and result in the lot arrangement depicted in the attached sketch plan. This approach would allow the City to require additional improvements, architectural controls and larger minimum house sizes. Conditions of approval would include: A landscaping plan including berming, irrigation and plantings to provide a buffer around the perimeter of development. 2. Restrictive covenants requiring a larger minimum house size, architectural controls, sod and irrigation on each lot, and restrictions on perimeter fencing. 0 3. Upgraded light fixtures and mailboxes. r-° 4. A monument sign at the southeast corner of the development. 0 5. A tree preservation plan providing tree save, transplant and replacement areas. 6. Additional landscaping requirements to ensure the storm water retention pond and wetland mitigation area utilize native plantings to improve the appearance. The second option would rezone the property to Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) and not allow planned unit development review. This would restrict the development to single family homes as well as the typical lot width, depth and area requirements. This approach would not allow the City to require additional improvements, architectural controls and larger minimum house sizes. Staff Recommendation Staff is supporting the first option because planned unit development review will result in a higher quality development that exceeds the minimum development standards of the Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) Zoning District. It is important to ensure that a high quality development will be located at this intersection and that controls are put in place to ensure the development remains high quality in the future. Conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances The proposed site is designated Urban Residential Low Density in the Comprehensive Plan • which carries a maximum density of four units per acre. The proposed project would have a density of 2.56 units per acre. The property is currently zoned Single Family Suburban Residential (R -3) which carries a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. The property will need to be rezoned. The most appropriate zoning district for the proposed project is Single Family Urban Residential (R -4). This district only allows townhouses under Planned Unit Development Review and only up to the maximum density of the R -4 Zoning District (four units per acre). The property is located inside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Utilities will need to be established to serve proposed the development. Planned Unit Development Review Ordinance 112 provides the requirements for Planned Unit Development review. This ordinance requires proposals to meet the following criteria: Attaining a higher standard of site design and development that cannot be accomplished under strict adherence to development ordinance provisions. (112A, 11 -9 -00) 2. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as natural . topography, woodlands, geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion; 3. A more efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering the development costs and public investments; 4. A development pattern in harmony with the Andover Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) The first two requirements will be addressed by the improvements described above. The proposed cul -de -sac design is the most safe and efficient design for streets and utilities, although would likely be the same in a typical single family development. The development pattern will conform to the surrounding neighborhood which contains both single family homes and townhouses. The project would have an overall density of 2.56 units . per acre which does not exceed the density of the single family portions of the surrounding neighborhood. The average lot size for single family lots would exceed 17,000 square feet. The lot arrangement will be reviewed to ensure cul -de -sac lots have frontages wide enough to allow adequate spacing of driveways and to provide for snow storage. Access The proposed project would be provided access from Ibis Street NW. Four existing accesses to Andover Boulevard would be eliminated. A public street would be brought into the proj ect and • end in a cul -de -sac. The potential for access to be provided from Andover Boulevard was explored and found not to be a viable option for the following reasons: 1. The distance from the intersection of Andover and Hanson Boulevards would not meet spacing requirements. 2. Future improvements to Andover Boulevard may include a median that would extend past a potential access and restrict traffic movements to right -in, right -out only from the development. 3. It is desirable for traffic from the development to be controlled at the intersection of Ibis Street before entering Andover Boulevard to prevent gridlock at the intersection of Andover and Hanson boulevards. Townhouse Lots The minimum lot size for townhouse lots in an R -4 district is 8,550 square feet. The proposed townhouse lots are below the minimum lot area requirement. Additional width is restricted by the additional right -of -way width (72 feet) provided to accommodate the existing house to the north. Additional lot depth is restricted by the desire to maximize the lot width of single family lots. • Townhouse Lots (cont.) The tollowmg table illustrates average lot area and width for other townhouse projects in Andover. Required Lot 13 1 Lot 14 Lot 15 Lot 16 Lot Area 18,550 8,443 16,414 6,394 8,593 The tollowmg table illustrates average lot area and width for other townhouse projects in Andover. As a part of Planned Unit Development review the development may be allowed to vary from the minimum lot size requirement of the Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) Zoning District. Double frontage lots Double frontage lots are prohibited unless one of the frontages faces an arterial street. Hanson Boulevard is the only arterial street adjacent to the proposed project. This means that the double frontage lots proposed along Andover Boulevard conflict with this provision of Ordinance 10. It • is not possible to eliminate access to Andover Boulevard without creating the need for double frontage lots. The three features that vary from local ordinances are the lot area of the four townhouse lots, the lot width of the single family lots and the double frontage lots along Andover Boulevard. These items would be clearly specified in an attachment to the preliminary and final plat resolution. Surrounding properties Surrounding properties have been developed with single family homes. The Nature's Run townhouse development will be located on the south side of Andover Boulevard. A Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) zoning district exists on the north side of Andover Boulevard. A Single Family Suburban District (R -3) also exists on the south side of Andover Boulevard. The construction of 145 Lane for this project would cause the existing lot immediately north of the project area on the east side of Ibis Street to become a corner lot. Additional right of way is proposed on the north side of the future street to increase the side yard setback for the existing house. The distance between the curb of the future street and the north edge of the right -of -way is approximately 26 feet. Corner lots that abut the front yards of other lots (with driveways) have a side yard setback of 35 feet. As proposed, the existing deck will have a setback of 14 feet from the property line and 40 feet from the curb. The house would have a setback of 29 feet from the property line and 55 feet from the curb (see attached Neighboring Property Survey). It is recommended that a variance be granted for this property due to the fact that the additional right - of -way will provide a setback that is equivalent to many other corner lots in the City. C! Nature's Red Pine Shawdowbrook Sunridge Townhomes Run Fields 3rd of Woodland Creek Avg Lot Area 3,550 sf 2,550 sf 6,000 sf 9,856 sf 3,850 Avg Lot width 47 feet 41 feet 57 feet 63 feet 70 feet As a part of Planned Unit Development review the development may be allowed to vary from the minimum lot size requirement of the Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) Zoning District. Double frontage lots Double frontage lots are prohibited unless one of the frontages faces an arterial street. Hanson Boulevard is the only arterial street adjacent to the proposed project. This means that the double frontage lots proposed along Andover Boulevard conflict with this provision of Ordinance 10. It • is not possible to eliminate access to Andover Boulevard without creating the need for double frontage lots. The three features that vary from local ordinances are the lot area of the four townhouse lots, the lot width of the single family lots and the double frontage lots along Andover Boulevard. These items would be clearly specified in an attachment to the preliminary and final plat resolution. Surrounding properties Surrounding properties have been developed with single family homes. The Nature's Run townhouse development will be located on the south side of Andover Boulevard. A Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) zoning district exists on the north side of Andover Boulevard. A Single Family Suburban District (R -3) also exists on the south side of Andover Boulevard. The construction of 145 Lane for this project would cause the existing lot immediately north of the project area on the east side of Ibis Street to become a corner lot. Additional right of way is proposed on the north side of the future street to increase the side yard setback for the existing house. The distance between the curb of the future street and the north edge of the right -of -way is approximately 26 feet. Corner lots that abut the front yards of other lots (with driveways) have a side yard setback of 35 feet. As proposed, the existing deck will have a setback of 14 feet from the property line and 40 feet from the curb. The house would have a setback of 29 feet from the property line and 55 feet from the curb (see attached Neighboring Property Survey). It is recommended that a variance be granted for this property due to the fact that the additional right - of -way will provide a setback that is equivalent to many other corner lots in the City. C! Wetland Mitigation The plan indicates that a sedimentation pond will be created between the development and Hanson Boulevard to accommodate surface water runoff. Other Ordinances The developer is also required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No. 8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. 107, Shoreland Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 108, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Coordination with other Agencies The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an • interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item. Park and Recreation Commission Comments The Park and Recreation Commission has reviewed this item and recommended that park dedication be paid for this project. ACTION REQUIRED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to informally advise the applicant on adjustments to the proposed project to conform with local ordinances and review criteria. Attachments Location Map Sketch Plan (11x17 in Packet) Neighboring Property Survey Public Notice Cc: Steve Boone, Boone Builders 6712 Bryant Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 r Boone Builders Residential Sketch Plan 1Y1 nr �7 x7oo - Mew 148TH V 14769 � A A A A � t° w 40 xnD Q x771 ^ m !N F-• 1L7/3 wN F- ryry 14TH M)w A r a N x781 +A 0 N r r r 1989 1918 147TH LN W u774 ^� +� u77e u76e < D x708 14769 14740 M7e1 (y O 14737 x764 Q 4762 LL! NTLt _ x763 area n 147TH C. F 4 4 x741 1716 < +en x u7u N r r U) 14719 14712 147 t4B0e p 147TH AVE 147TH AVE + 1970 1920 Z 14700 1 x080 +4x03 x620 B n $ 14688 14 f 14086 x000 14681 J 14576 Meal — 45n men 14671 1541 14684 — ^4000 xeeD 14661 Z r r 14670 14669 14652 146TH 661 14e8D 14851 o r 146TH LN 1969 14640 �A1 r ^ 4653 140x0 14 Z 1636 N S v 4esz ^' r 14030 14631 Q xem = m xam 14620 ci m m 14808 4621 1 14619 14016 A m 1673 r In v v v a ueo4 146TH AVE 611 4 _ g >- &' CO 14570 ` AVE x6D2 y +x051 urea usw m - 4601 useD Imes w 14563 14569 Iae7d ¢ x67D +"�B 1a5Tr m 6 _ — Men x560 -- 146x9 14657 fiat us M660 145fi9 U 1850 + 14660 146M 146 F' x608 14631 pa CO x563 14644 x841 Y N W 116x/ m 14630 14626 14620 w R u3I In + M 3 1x03+ 1425 C w m m m ° m g °D 7O ` 14520 � 5 x510 r N N 1748 1718 1650 1571 0 � � � � < Q 14437 < < < < r < r r 144TH AVE m 144TH AVE 0 +4306 14300 Maw < rf x376 14372 x371 16372 I 1570 ••: '`i:.. x302 td>67 14364 x363 14364 575 1437! 14336 14336 x336 A e_.: x6 s.:. �fs•..3� Q � 14316 14317 14318 ^42+4 W142 43 D AVE x271 T 14262 W 16 x P , e 14200 276 , — 14216 74276 14M V +6x08 14195 14204 J 9100 M 1674 u+n g 14x52 Z r 14176 x160 14170 14UD N Q 1673 � + � >a x170 xIT1 14 226 Z 1585 14 41W 14706 a s1• ❑ . = 1576 m 6 Ln r I r N Project Location Map 6 City of Andover ab Planning Department L J • OLMSTEAO BUILDERS APPROVED STAM U RA GARAGE FLOOR SHALL BE MINIM 18 ��,� R� � FOR 56TE ABOVE EXISTING STREET GRADE WI FOR FOOTING INSPEa'ON. MAXIMUM tAPE DF.10 P_ERCENL F Z I•. ? • W 9 V J t� HY -LAND SURVEYING I 4NQ No 3 060 F. a9tC LAND SURVEYORS SCALI1" a _ 20, TOP of Block 841 Ali 0 041nohs Mat morglment ,d aoraag Floor 7843 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 5NI48 a Denotts Wood Nub SO For Exetivotlon Only ,iad La.+ll Floor 360.1964 :000.0 Detofm Exlstkty Elevo loo pa of Build" - Q Denotes Propoesd EkavarW 1 ev e r, - # e� -46 a Donates Surfoos Droka" • OLMSTEAO BUILDERS APPROVED STAM U RA GARAGE FLOOR SHALL BE MINIM 18 ��,� R� � FOR 56TE ABOVE EXISTING STREET GRADE WI FOR FOOTING INSPEa'ON. MAXIMUM tAPE DF.10 P_ERCENL F Z I•. ? • W 9 V J t� ttv oetir sawrtwnts al+Own an ham alsta of head a Rtlonttaiblt Ptwidsd b! .� I hereby tsrtify that this survey was Prepared by M at unaer /Z 1W ur direct suaervlaion, vet that 2 M a dliv Registered Land /I sveyor W gs ar the le of the State or nlRMaota. ' &xvirpsmotqusari 18TH y SEPTEMBER }Q 93 d Milton E. Hybnd, Minn, eo NQ 20262 .. -7- a9tC T.P laou- l •• - 695.57 ZZ � -) J� � I - sat,4 -- 841 Ali _ -__ -3 .�__ - -_• ___ ___41.00 - -_ -�_ to {O i 1 us y z gas,t � N1 tr•o• Q � � ©RESIDENCfM e - - � i ss.s sz -a I �}r JI py.y N W - I HRM+- 1 sy e4t,4 -- art.e �1 LOT 18, BLOCK 1, PINE11D00 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION ttv oetir sawrtwnts al+Own an ham alsta of head a Rtlonttaiblt Ptwidsd b! .� I hereby tsrtify that this survey was Prepared by M at unaer /Z 1W ur direct suaervlaion, vet that 2 M a dliv Registered Land /I sveyor W gs ar the le of the State or nlRMaota. ' &xvirpsmotqusari 18TH y SEPTEMBER }Q 93 d Milton E. Hybnd, Minn, eo NQ 20262 .. -7- v6v@6c.&-ce H 1ar- AAKER STACY L & SUSAN G 146TH AVE NW OVER, MN 55304 273224140039 AASE GREGORY C & ANITA Z 14588 IBIS ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140074 ARKELIN KEVIN R & JANET L BOWER DAVID R 14589 IBIS ST NW 1736 ANDOVER BLVD NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140018 273224410005 BUTORAC CARRIE J 14567 JAY ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140071 COOPER MICHAEL R & CAROLJ 1690 146TH AVE NW OVER, MN 55304 CHASKA BRADLEY A & MICHELLE A 1709 146TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 CURRENT RESIDENT 1703 ANDOVER BLVD NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140003 CRUCE MICHAEL G & KAREN L 14532 JAY ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 DRYDEN RANDY & DEBBIE 6700 VIKING BLVD ANOKA, MN 55303 263224230059 FRISBY ROBERT L & JENNIFER M 14555 JAY ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 HANDORFF JOHN W & MARY J 1673 146TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 HERDA BRIAN A & PAMELA J 14564 IBIS ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140077 ENZMANN THOMAS & BALASKI C 1718 ANDOVER BLVD NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 GRUNZ WILLIAM R JR & KELLY R 14601 GROUSE ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 HEAD RUSSELL P & BEVERLEY A 14579 JAY ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 HUBERTY THOMAS A 14611 GROUSE ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140Q12 *KE FIRMIN M & MARY JOHNSTON JEFFREY A & ANN JAYEE E 1685 146TH AVE NW 14540 IBIS ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 BRENDEN PAUL 1654 146TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140014 CHIABOTTI MICHAEL J & J S 1559 144TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 263224320075 CLEVELAND THOMAS C & DIANE 1721146TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 DAMMANN RANDALL J & LAURA J 14620 GROUSE ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 FISCHER BRIAN M 1571144TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 263224320076 GUGISBERG MARK R & S L 14608 DRAKE ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 263224230062 HERDA BRIAN A & PAMELA J 14564 IBIS ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140078 HUPP WILLIAM G & K M 1650 ANDOVER BLVD NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224410002 JOHNSTON JEFFREY A & JAYNE E 14540 IBIS ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 203 �'Ox�H 2AtZ JONES JIMMY G & TAMMY JO JONES JOHN J & DEBRA J j i l k 1 146TH AVE NW 14531 JAY ST NW DOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140042 273224140068 LARSON MATTHEW J MATTSON THOMAS P & 14621 GROUSE ST NW CINDY A ANDOVER, MN 55304 14520 JAY ST NW 273224140011 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PALO JUANITA M PERALA TIMOTHY K 1680 ANDOVER BLVD NW 14565 IBIS ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224410007 273224140020 PETTMAN MICHAEL R & SCHMELING JAMES D & MARCI L SHERYLE G 14552 IBIS ST NW 14516 IBIS ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 SEVERSON DOUGLAS L & SPIELMANN DARCY J & DIANA F CANDACE F 14576 IBIS ST NW 1678 146TH AVE NW W OVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 STERN DARELL O STERN DARELL O 7710 MAIN ST NE 7710 MAIN STREET NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 273224140005 273224140002 WHEELER CALVIN R & CINDY WILLIAMS KEVIN R & HILL R DINA L 14528 IBIS ST NW 14577 113I ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 • KALLESTAD J S & HOLMES K M 1748 ANDOVER BLVD NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 OLSON DONALD R & LINDA L 14591 JAY ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140073 PETERSON JOHN M 14553 IBIS ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140021 SCHWEISS CARMEN R 14543 JAY ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 273224140069 STAY DANIEL R & PATRICIA A 1668 146TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 STREICH ROGER & DARLENE 1583 144TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 553 263224320077 WOODWORTH DEE J & ANITA 14606 DRAKE ST NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 263224230019 MN I 11 II 11 Il I i I � � II I II I i II II f 1 I I I I � I I I I I IO LU �I! I i I�iI i i Z I i i W i I II(Cr I 1 f.� I il w i urre iiYl� '- I 7 fir I � I 1 ml 12,190 sq. k1 625ACRESt �e NINO: R3, PLO - 25 -35 RD LOT -10 t_ : J RLOT -O -TVA NHOME RD STREET -35 7 ARD -25 ILY LOT SIZE -12, 190 SO. FT _ I 09 Z —�! LOT SIZE -6,394 SOFT. pTS 1 2.56 LOTS PER ACRES r T 1 8,843 sq. fL\ 1 � y ` 41�iL f /1 fl tj 1 48 1 6,583 Wit. I I 7 � i 78 )NING: R -3 — _g'.4 / - -35 ,RD LOT- 10' RD STREET -36 A 0 E - 20,0 �E 20,000 SOFTr sq. f l OpiXEASiWMTEA69 Y,,iCN 9NQi M,RH WE6' II _ V / ' l BT E9Etp FEET; i35mfRN1M T'A WAiRYyEAYLmE ENCINOAl1ME9WmY.Z BTOtlENER fYSICI EA9TXIV; mENC! I = LM,IEPf 10 MlGO,1iCPlEbNYx3QTIE Vx'JiORCEEV@j / MO EASTXAV AIXSIAVCPffE91mfEEi,mlNCf PAR1.RAR41El�Nm ,E]M FEEi.mexft FlSi F/WLLINfIN mE 9W m LL4EeF yq rn,FARIIlEL W,r «6W wEerlNe/.oe1411Y CF$mR muo • o,evwtt s mmFEErrome wNr veeEwwo. I � I ER ETON DEVELOPMENT L.L.C, _#ONE! BILL GLEASON IBROOK CROSSING I I 'N PARK, MN 55443 90 Wf I I I � I 0 rL w 0 jog LL � W y O r Qp f Z G U d b � O o � b� b� ' b G e d a � a x A EnW � ry p � F a :4 V '4 6 o ?Cb Y•�K n F� G in J Z F- Q Z O co n Lr z O a U z •• w = VE W O C ) M > O LL Do I-Y X O o LL Z OF 'O TO: FROM: CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CLANDOVER.MN.US Planning and Zoning Commissioners Courtney Bednarz, City Plann4 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Residential Sketch Plan for single family urban residential project proposed to be located at 1444 161" Avenue NW for Mark Tibbetts DATE: May 14, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a sketch plan for an urban residential development containing 6 single family lots. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of 161 Avenue NW and Crane Street NW. Review Criteria Ordinance 10, Section 6 outlines the requirements for sketch plan review. The Planning Commission is asked to informally advise the subdivider of the extent to which the plan conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, design standards of city, county, state and federal agencies and possible modification necessary to secure approval of the plan. Submission of a sketch plan does not constitute formal filing of a plat. DISCUSSION This sketch was developed in conjunction with the Shady Oak Grove sketch plan that was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 9, 2002. The proposed sketch would bring a street connection into the property from Crane Street and have six lots positioned around a cul -de -sac as indicated in the attached sketch. Conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances The proposed site is designated Urban Residential Low Density in the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently zoned Single Family Rural Residential (R -1) which carries a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. The property will need to be rezoned to Single Family Urban Residential (R- 4) to allow an urban residential development with utilities. The property is located inside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and utilities are available to serve the proposed development. • Lots Double frontage lots are required to have a minimum lot depth of 140 feet. All corner lots are required to be ten percent wider than interior lots. As the table indicates, all of the lots will meet these requirements. ' Lot depth is measured by taking the average of three measures: one at each property line and one at the center of the lot. 2 Lot width is measured at the front yard setback line: 35 feet. • Surrounding properties The property to the north and east is zoned Rural Residential (R -1) and contains single family homes. The property to the west is under review for a single family urban development containing 16 lots. The property to the south is nearly fully developed as a single family urban residential neighborhood. Other Ordinances The developer is also required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No. 8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. 107, Shoreland Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 108, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Coordination with other Agencies • The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an Proposed - Required Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot Depth: 130 feet 180 feet 140 feet 175 feet 142 feet 136 feet 156 feet Lot Width : 80 feet 99 feet 82 feet 85 feet 85 feet 85 feet 106 feet Lot Area: 11,400 sf 15,534 feet 14,116 feet 23,020 feet 14,202 feet 14,547 feet 15,753 feet ' Lot depth is measured by taking the average of three measures: one at each property line and one at the center of the lot. 2 Lot width is measured at the front yard setback line: 35 feet. • Surrounding properties The property to the north and east is zoned Rural Residential (R -1) and contains single family homes. The property to the west is under review for a single family urban development containing 16 lots. The property to the south is nearly fully developed as a single family urban residential neighborhood. Other Ordinances The developer is also required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No. 8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. 107, Shoreland Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 108, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Coordination with other Agencies • The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an • interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item. Park and Recreation Commission Comments The Park and Recreation Commission will review this item at an upcoming meeting. ACTION REQUIRED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to informally advise the applicant on adjustments to the proposed project to conform with local ordinances and review criteria. Attachments Location Map Sketch Plan (l 1x17 in packet) Public Notice Resp ct ly submitted, Courtn , e ah i Cc: Mark Tibbetts, 1444 161 Avenue NW • 3 Mark Tibbetts W�E Project Location Map s City of Andover Planning Department Residential Sketch Plan rf' %6A-rr CURRENT RESIDENT CURRENT RESIDENT 161ST AVE 1487 161 STAVE OVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 1 3224230008 143224230004 CURRENT RESIDENT TIBBETTS MARK R 1422 161 STAVE 1444 161 ST AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 143224320009 143224320011 • • CURRENT RESIDENT 16157 HANSON BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 143224230006 _.c_ rk Tib b ets OWNER: Mark Tlbbets 1414 161st Avenus N.W. M 143> 23a Andover, MN 55304 derv+ A ! ol[en A oluscwm 71 50.51 - -- 612)282 -1387 cal "— DESIGNER, ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR: - Hokomon Mdetem Assodalse, Inc . o ,M 3601 Thum Avea» lVED Anoko, MN 55303 (763) 427 -MM MUNIGIPAUTY: ANOKA COUNTY mwom ummm se..c s NOtiY53' 6`E w a t er . Existin 20NINC: SW97 E � P amod �WATERSHED DISTRICT I 1 ° o O 1 °t7 0 ti aR9POSm PIM i M 143U43 In2 G L Itflt5pl t YS'ffiMAiT / / / I I I I I � I I � , r al / / c if I oNi \ � MNe11 r\� ` l 1t7aT et 4 1� q$ sow PROPOSED USE STREET UGHTINC. AREA SUMMARY: Pavel Area: LOT SUMMARY: Number of Lots Largest Lot Smallest Lot Average Lot Arms BuldoWm Lot Arse: Dsnslty. _I_m City of Andowr City UUMme (available) City Utilities (owloble) R1 (Single Fm+ly Rural) R4 (Single Family Urbm) Coon Crack Watershed District ReddmntioL Single Family An Rpuksd 81007 sq. R 222 oares 6 Residential 0.43 came 0.33 ogee 0.36 oca 11,400 sq. R pr lot (minknan) 0.37 lots Per core \ , LEGEND m - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE V - HYDRANT ` 0 - STOW SEVER MANHOLE - CATCH BASIN t _ �/ pd - CANE VALVE 0 o - ELECTRIC BOX lVED ®: TELEPH � I \7 � $I - MAILBOX L.�..'1JC, ® - UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER -IRON MONUMENT FOUND - i -- DENOTES WATER LINE DENOTES SANITARY SEWER LINE DENOTES STORM SEWER UIE MOVE DENOTES RON MONUMENT � AND M ARKED WITH LICENSE NO. 15420. UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LICE -ix�- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE -e -- DENOTES OVII6EAD ELECTRIC LICE 1 1 1 i0 o I -* -- DENOTES OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE DENOTES UTILITY POLE GUYW6E \1 I C I { 0 1 'C "Y - J 30460 In n 110. C=I « NpaeGe Nfa0N1q M TO: FROM: Planning and Zoning Commissioners D. Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING Residential Sketch Plan for Constance Corners, a single family development located at 16034 Crosstown Boulevard for Brueggeman Homes DATE: May 14 tt ', 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a residential sketch plan for `Constance Corners', a property located east of Burlington Northern and Santa Fe railway, South of CSAH 20/161 avenue and west of Crosstown Boulevard. • Review Criteria Ordinance 10, Section 6 outlines the requirements for sketch plan review. The Planning Commission is asked to informally advise the subdivider of the extent to which the plan conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, design standards of city, county, state and federal agencies and possible modification necessary to secure approval of the plan. Submission of a sketch plan does not constitute formal filing of a plat. DISCUSSION Conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances The project area is approximately 36.8 acres. The proposed density (1.17 units per acre) conforms with the low density land use designation from the Comprehensive Plan for the property which allows up to 3 units per acre without PUD review. The property is zoned Single Family Rural (R -1). A rezoning to Single Family Urban (R -4) will be necessary to bring the zoning into alignment with the Comprehensive Plan and to allow the project to move forward. CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US Many of the lots border wetland mitigation areas, especially south of 160 Lane and west of Quince Street. Review by the Coon Creek Watershed Management Organization will determine whether this development proposal is feasible. • The purpose of outlot A at the northeast corner of the sketch plan is to allow the existing Church to meet minimum setback requirements should it decide to expand. Outlot B at the southwest corner of the sketch plan will also be combined with adjacent property to the south of it. Both of these properties must become a part of the plat before this can move through the preliminary plat phase. The applicant does not plan on creating these outlots unless the adjacent property owners wish to purchase them. A covenant will then be necessary to ensure this takes place. Although a majority of the lot sizes and arrangements conform to the R-4 requirements there are two properties which are questionable. The cul -de -sac on the southwest corner of the sketch plan may need to be shortened in order to allow lots 22 and 23 to meet the minimum depth requirements of 130 feet before the preliminary plat phase. The property is located inside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Utilities will need to be established to serve the proposed development. Access Access to the development would be provided from Crosstown Boulevard, 161 Avenue and Sycamore Street by way of Crosstown Boulevard. The sketch indicates a curvilinear 60 foot wide street that begins on Crosstown Boulevard and ends at 161" Avenue. A planting plan which will provide buffering of the residential area from the county road will be necessary with • the preliminary plat. Other Ordinances The developer is also required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No. 8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. 107, Shoreland Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 108, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Coordination with other Agencies The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item. 0 Park and Recreation Commission Comments The Park and Recreation Commission will review this item at an upcoming meeting. Staff Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to informally advise the applicant on adjustments to the proposed project to conform with local ordinances and review criteria. ACTION REQUIRED Discuss the potential for the proposed development and make recommendations for changes that may be needed. Attachments Location Map Sketch Plan (11 x 17 in packet) Public Notice R�espp t� submitt d, • D. ler MYca Ty Cc: Bruegggeman Homes, 3564 Rollingview Drive. White Bear Lake, MN 55110 0 Bruggeman Homes Residential Sketch Plan 4 W � E Project Location Map 9 City of Andover Planning Department - Z/-- ©oo Od4A0p e�a�mda� .. ©a v ■ o ;moo • r ; °noY��D� !�' . !' �p� <� o'�m'n�' m m ° eda� •d�uuu a0000n'+ QfJt'• C�4`�„nfcl��►� '� m v �,t�€�P�,� �L a Mm e a ���;� I Il� � '� eE► !mac ° �*° m�°° �I��� ■� �� �������� 4 W � E Project Location Map 9 City of Andover Planning Department - Z/-- - -------- 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW,. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA. STATE OF MINNESOTA The Planning and"Zomng Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, May 14th, 2002 at Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW, Andover, Minnesota to review a Residential Sketch Plan for a single family development located at 16034 Crosstown Boulevard NW for Bruggeman Homes, on property legally described aJ? follows; The northeast quarter of the southeast quarter, except the north 208 feet of the east 520 feet thereof, Section 14, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. All written and verbal comments will be received at that time -and location. A copy of the proposed application will be available for review prior to the meeting at City Hein. Please contact D, Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner with any questions at (763) 767-5142, ~/~~ D.TYl~kaY, Ass ciate Planner j3Ita 6Gcowt � CURRENT RESIDENT 61ST AVE OVER, MN 55304 143224140002 CURRENT RESIDENT 903 161 STAVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 143224140001 CURRENT RESIDENT 741 CONSTANCE BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 133224230006 CURRENT RESIDENT 1055 161 STAVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 143224130004 CURRENT RESIDENT 680 CONSTANCE BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 133224320002 CURRENT RESIDENT 15975 CROSSTOWN BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 133224320005 CURRENT RESIDENT 15850 SYCAMORE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 024440009 • CURRENT RESIDENT 759 CONSTANCE BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 133224230005 CURRENT RESIDENT 16034 CROSSTOWN BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 143224410006 CURRENT RESIDENT 15845 SYCAMORE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 143224440022 CURRENT RESIDENT 15890 SYCAMORE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 143224440025 CURRENT RESIDENT 16110 WARD LAKE DR ANDOVER, MN 55304 143224140004 CURRENT RESIDENT 16019 CROSSTOWN BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 133224320003 CURRENT RESIDENT 15827 CROSSTOWN BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 133224330001 UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH 16060 CROSSTOWN BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 S- A SKETCH PLAN O.ry • ww.n boreal 8 . Be Be . I \ e Q J E . U z • 5 Z s � CIO I Q 9� Z • .I W 0 g o. zl. z` 0 �I W m 1 I I y � 0 FEE: L r. L M°y llhr. Ano A,w o X 14 OF THE SE X14 OF E. 24, ANOKA CO., MNs a .I. 55304 N.W. (0 55304 I Ina. / Quarter, .swot the north 208.00 feet of the coat 520.00 feet thereof, a County, Minnesota. rte, of the Sauthaart Qirter Icing within the Right —af —Way of the Id. Q -of—Way Plot No. 20. Rood Na 18. �yl Street N.W. per Anoka County Hot Section map. Dewlopmenl, aamprleed of 43 .Ingle— fonely re.iden8ol Iota and H e bulding setback line. er u e. cat double frontage Iota must be 140 feet st viu.>m r ow 1 35 feet 0 feel r ; 20 fe fe t 7 30 fee! Oy 40 feet r By Rural) f °y�O 9 bmly Urban) eq , r e7 11 it ' DA0VE0. 0 � T6 AFeA Of PRJPO4L gEIUM FSL (10,706 SF.rOTA1 KS.111D f14 am PR CS:O NEIVNO FILL AIF.'A r am AREA oP PRaasEO erBxe wlwAf (30.783 ss.l. 24 OM P WMa eER.Ar10 W nGAMOM AREA 1 T RS EAST. S'aT EISVAIMN Eli. CIXIILYR / DM FAT. RIAW WtrAnJ,r AIEA e•+ ORS FIST. Coq M Swi AREA W - %M FaM. aNYWQR SURFACE➢ AfeA e Oci Zm EOM. Cohawm CURB AXa RITRA h0m EAST. L Hr I. PRE Q I EOM. POSER POIE . VARIANCE REQUIRED TO EXCEED m rJ 1 R p 0 1 R p z w WY vm MAX CUL —DE —SAC LENGTH. I 1 } MIR am. Gu EI,C1RrlC Ire Mm EOM. OWTMEM ELWW AE twE ORS EA4T. 11E11M10 OE1r = By XJ AUa pWRONMdTA SQMCA CRIPMIy. MPr01fD By 0004 OIEEN e1TIR91Efl otBrnBm OIM E105T. FVICE LOe ORS FIST. SRC OCROIG ORS E6T. W BOA mES ENM. TclfPllRlE BteC ONES DIET.. TO.EPRCNE MANMOE ]RS EAST. MAIL Site: J.dwO art of NE1 /4 of the SE7 /4, SKETCH PLAN Y SEC. 14, R. 2 32, January 21, 02 O Anoka County, Minnesota. NEwNSO Apra 1O, , 2 002 1/ VICINITY MAP CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners CC: Will Neumeister, Community Development Director W& FROM: Jason M. Angell, Planning Intern SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Lot Split (02 -07) with variances to minimum lot width for property without address located immediately south of 13503 Crooked Lake Boulevard east of the intersection of 135 Circle and Crooked Lake Boulevard (Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 137). DATE: May 14, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the lot split and variance request of John Stahuke to split the vacant lot immediately south of 13503 Crooked Lake Boulevard east of the intersection of 135"' Circle and Crooked Lake Boulevard, legally described as Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 137. A variance is requested to the minimum lot width requirements of Ordinance 8, Section 6.02. The current zoning of the property is R -4, Single Family Urban. DISCUSSION Mr. Stahuke is requesting to split the current property, with a width of 154.45 feet, into two urban residential lots with a width of 77.22 feet for Tract A and 77.23 feet for Tract B. The minimum lot frontage for this zoning district is 80 feet. Ordinance No. 10, Section 17 provides the procedure for reviewing variance requests. Sewer and water stubs have been constructed for two lots on this property. Staff has asked Mr. Stahuke to contact his neighbors to the North and South to determine their interest of selling him the additional land that would be needed to meet the minimum lot width requirements (letter attached). A County ditch easement, 40 feet wide, used to divide the property, but has since been vacated as of February 7, 2002. Attached is a letter from the Anoka County Attorney's Office confirming the vacation of easement along with a resolution. The City Engineer has asked that the existing pipe be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. • Staff Recommendations • Soil borings to establish buildability. • Remove existing pipe before building permit is issued. • Establish 10 -foot easement in front and back, and 5 -foot easement on the sides of both properties to preserve 100 -year flood plain (easements will need to be recorded as a separate document). Attachments • Site location map • Copy of plat (showing vacated easement) • Vacation of easement — letter from Anoka County • Property survey • Letter from applicant • Ordinance 10, Section 17 • Labels ACTION REQUIRED Staff is recommending approval of the lot split subject to the recommendations listed above. • Respectfully submitted, 3a44�- U� Jason M. Angell Cc: John Stahuke 12208 Thrush St. NW Coon Rapids, MN 55448 I + 0 John Stahnke Homes Lot Split 13024 h fi 134107 13831 13890 812 1 �+ gg +an +,7wo 13� 13887+ 2870 N 8 W N 13871 7 19790 2800 2830 in 13725 3037 J10 2733 13725 13718 13713 2807 LV vh +7em 2e68 m 13624 2858 13846 2772 N N 1 fewe Fea 84 36 13859 13882 aee. 13825 13824 13642 1369e ,xw +aie q 13807 13670 m ,an 0 362 13910 13954 _ 361 19608 13811 ' +7x1 1381 13842 + p gg SS 1383 a1e 1g A R a 3601 13558 fem+ ueeo 8q 13808 13 13554 2937 +tae 13583 3 3 A 13537 13611 35 13527 2840 ,�° 7w uee 1611 2829 13528 1 35 O 7: 13517 13524 13525 2833 m7a R 1 TH CIR 13503 13507 73520 13523 13485 1351 R n ^A 4i� 3578 13447 13504 p 13453 135UD 13445 ssm 7em N m m > p 273 pp 13484 13435 13450 13153 N 2820 w d F F 2705 13488 13425 +sua +we 134TH N 28 13452 13137 13430 w n.a 1nx z7m 704 13405 13436 13415 73351 , 1666 8 13418 13409 Ter 2721 nee 2957 13361 13420 405 13354 +7666 ` N 2Bi5 3 134TH AVE R �{ Q }y 13392 13338 q '/ , , W 2874 F a F 13339 1392 13328 g ,� �� LO t � R 2729 m® 13323 13M +am 5 r, mn m+e w +aa 1� 133RD LN 193 �Y11d '1WY1 7010 13363 City of Coon Rapids • Project Location Map Oq/ VI 13875 I 2487 Z n 13731 vs u 13715 5g 1 ti 2987 2984 1 13609 1 N W 8 City of Andover Planning Department rho AA 2 7 A-4 00 Z7. 11 1. 74 AUD 2/c. 14 � w 4) IN Xk ff (D X5 ZM o6 UJ: U, >; CC W L 0 2 (jig) JM 102 W 135THk Cl D vT Ali, 07 e�� 1 (4) A f Do 61) -IS6, ul— T AM -T-H--AVt—, - 4 su B. I DO RW 1 AS 1) 10 E44 I s TT OD I " B Oro 4 L 2 t t i (J�r) tr J 2�7. 0 -- o. 13 4 TH' LANE N.W. 4011 1 A Vp 1 (44) v ym-pi Ca CE 4v. pf . ....... A., =11-. 0 /7 op 41 le- ox, p J ew cn 2 !2) 00 4 13 TH AVE N.W. ( `e ) Jw 134 TH AVE. N.W. a] W 9 /1J (Al) * < o (7) NO. 1 02 ( 7'. R F OA- CE 12 1,5 rho AA 2 7 A-4 00 Z7. 11 1. 74 AUD 2/c. 14 � w 4) IN Xk ff (D X5 ZM o6 UJ: U, >; CC W L 0 2 (jig) JM 102 W 135THk Cl D vT Ali, 07 e�� 1 (4) A f Do 61) -IS6, ul— T AM -T-H--AVt—, - 4 su B. I DO RW 1 AS 1) 10 E44 I s TT OD I " B Oro 4 L 2 t t i (J�r) tr J 2�7. 0 -- o. 13 4 TH' LANE N.W. 4011 1 A Vp 1 (44) v ym-pi Ca CE 4v. pf . ....... A., =11-. 0 /7 op 41 le- ox, p J ew cn 2 !2) 00 4 13 TH AVE N.W. ( `e ) Jw 134 TH AVE. N.W. a] W 9 /1J (Al) * < ANO KA COUNTY ATTORNEY K0131 ' M.A. Y)IINSO N rnna•nl Ceillel • ) II) I Thiid Avcnnc • n ri,ika, MN 55.3O.I J)65 allcn _(t�yc�»c_u, :ululia_(tii>_us Adn,inislrifimi it, il Division 0iminnl 1)1% isioll victim- wilnece Sol vices .luvenile Division Faniily I my & Nlcoml ncallh Division 1 76331 321.5586 (763),12,;-5559 Investigation Division {76i) 121 'issO f 7h 1) 421 1174 Vav Of, 3) 32.; 5769 1 a (763) 32 - 5586 (761) =12 7589 Fox (761) 1123 -5651 Fax Jim Hughes Greenwell Realty 2916 132nd Ave NW Coon Rapids MN 55448 February 7, 2002 RE: Request to Vacate Easement Dear Mr. Hughes: I am writing in regards to your request that the County of Anoka vacate an easement that it has over Lot 3, Auditors Sub. No. 137 (PIN 33- 23- 24 =43- 0001 ). Please be advised that at its February 4th meeting, the Public Works Committee of the Anoka County Board approved the adoption of a resolution authorizing the release /extinguishment of the County easement. This matter will now go before the full County Board at its regularly scheduled meeting on February 12, 2002. Attached please find a copy of the Resolution and legal description that was approved by the Public; Works' Committee. • In addition, please review the legal description which is attached to the Resolution. In reviewing the abstract that you provided, I noted the deed by which your clients, the Sheppard's acquired title to the property omitted ' a "call ". Please note that I have used the legal description from the deed whereby the Sheppard's predecessor in interest acquired title. See entry No. 107 of the abstract and Document No. 166702, a copy of which is enclosed herein. For comparison purposes f have also enclosed a copy of Document No. 204783, which is the deed whereby Henry and Elaine Sheppard,acquired title. It is my understanding that you, have an agreement with Jon Olson, Division Manager of Public Services, which provides that you will be paying $100.00 for the release of the easement. I would be appreciative if you could forward a check for $100.00 tome at the ahove address. The check should be made payable to the Anoka County Treasurer. I would be appreciative if you could also make arrangements to come in and pick up the abstract which you had previously delivered to me..; If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (763) 323 -5668. Sincerely, - ban klint Assistant,Anoka County Attorney DAK a Enclosures) cc: Jon Olson Mike Kelly Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE TO RELEASE /EXTINGUISH EASEMENT WHEREAS, Henry F. Sheppard and Elaine Ann Sheppard, (hereinafter "Sheppards ") are the owners of certain real property situated in the City of Andover, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, which property is legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter "Property"); and WHEREAS, by an instrument of conveyance dated January 13, 1956, which was filed in the office of the Anoka County Recorder as Document No. 176521 (hereinafter "Conveyance Document "), the State of Minnesota conveyed certain, dam, control works and flowage easements ( hereinafter collectively referred to as "easements ") to Anoka County (hereinafter "County"); and WHEREAS, a portion of the easements encumbers the Property; and L • WHEREAS, the County has not used the rights described in the Conveyance Document for a significant period of time and does not.have a present and /or future need for the rights granted by the Conveyance Document; and WHEREAS, the Sheppards' have requested that the County relinquish any and all rights granted by Conveyance Document so that the Property can be developed. NOW, THEREFORE, B& IT RESOLVED that the Anoka County Board of Commissioners hereby approves, authorizes and directs the Anoka County Board Chair and Anoka County Administrator to execute.the necessary documents to extinguish /release any interest that the County may have in the Property arising from the Conveyance Document. I: \CN \DK \RESOLUTI \sheppard- request -ca -1.31 wpd l • Resolution #2002 -PW07 Exhibit A Page 2 EXHIBIT A That part of the South half of the Southeast Quarter (S' /z of SE'/s) of Section Thirty -three (33), Township Thirty -two (32), Range Twenty -four (24) that is described as follows: Commencing at a point on the West line of the said South half (S'/2) of the Southeast Quarter (SE' /a) which point is distani Seventy (70) rods North from the Southwest corner of the said South Half of the Southeast Quarter (S'V2 of SE'/a) and proceeding thence East and parallel to the South line of the said South half of Southeast Quarter (S'/: of SETA) to the center line of Coon Creek, so- called, a natural waterway and proceeding thence North along said center line to the -North line of the said South Half of Southeast Quarter (S'/s of SE'/a) and proceeding thence west on said North line to the Northwest corner of the said South half of Southeast Quarter (S' /x of SETA) and proceeding thence South on the West line of the said South fthlf of Southeast Quarter (S' /z of SE'/a) to the point of commencement herein. ri i 0 0 JOHN:'ST . HNKE HOMES t 1 t `y1 I ty1 I b tyt k �,A 1 4 a J �tl 4 � el p �t ► h�F ak �tl o I h a 1 V� 9 tyt1 �8` f k 1 1 1 1 1 ), Y '1 q* SCALE: 1 1kch =20 Hot '4 **not** Irea weaa.eat sI - ieflroad eplke L parer pole at the Northwest gsadreat of I35th Avenue aed Crooked bate Blvd. Bleeatiou 866.15 au Laeal Bat"m City ; of Andover. nieaeaots 1 by certify that shim - survey...: I report a prepared by r �1 w 4 direct aapsrviaiea at I s a duly Registered mayor madW the lave of Its I /0 . ISO. Ro. byR y 1 L IRON- MONfOM£110 -. 519 SeorN L+NE by SW • RECEIVED 7671 - 182/2 -5 AP^ 2 ` v " CITY OF ANDOVER i I i MAY -08 -02 WED 02:21 PM SCI =HOMES 6127675611 P.02 1.S.1R.,iNC. SO: mhe fthiko Nomes 12208 Thrush St NW . Coon Rapids, MN 55448 Phone 61 L396.6479 Fax 763- 767 -5611 May 08, 2002 City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 To whom it may concern, On 5 -6 -02 and 5 -7 -02, a representative of my company spoke to the residents whose property borders the parcel in question, directly to the north and to the south, about possibly selling six feet of either of their properties which border the parcel I am attempting to split. The resident directly to the south, identified as Shawn Swenson, of 13453 Crooked Lake Blvd NW, stated that he was not interested in selling any of his property, including the six feet on his northern border. The resident directly to the north, identified as Kathleen Junker, of 13503 Crooked Lake Blvd NW, also stated that she was not interested in selling any of her property, including the six feet on her southern border. Both residents have signed a handwritten statement, indicating their intentions, copies of which will be provided with this letter. • Sincerely, ohn W. St nke, Jr. J.S.JR., INCJJohn Stahnke Hanes MAY 08 2002 13:56 6127675611 PAGE.02 0 SECTION 17. VARIANCES. 17.01 Hardship. The Council may grant a variance from the requirements of this Ordinance as to specific tracts of land where it is shown that by reason of topography or other physical conditions strict compliance with these requirements could cause an exceptional and undue hardship to the enjoyment of a substantial property right; provided, that a variance may be granted only if the variance does not adversely affect the adjacent property owners and Comprehensive Development Plan or the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, (IOC, 10- 17 -78) 17.02 Procedure. Written application for a variance shall be filed with the Clerk, and shall State fully all facts relied upon by the applicant. The application shall be supplemented with maps, plans or other data which may aid in an analysis of the matter. The application shall be referred to the Planning Commission for its recommendation and report to the Council. 17.03 Council Action. No variance shall be granted by the Council unless it shall have received the affirmative vote of a majority of the full Council. SECTION 18. VIOLATION AND PENALTY. Any person, form or corporation violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished as defined by State Law. • (10C, 10- 17 -78) The platting, replatting, subdividing or conveyance of land not in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance may be enforced by mandamus, injunction, or any other appropriate remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. SECTION 19. REPEAL. All Ordinances or portions thereof in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 20. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the Council this 15th day of February, 1972. /s/ Lou Appleby CHAIRMAN ATTEST: /s/ Mary L. West CLERK Amended thru l OZ, 9 -16 -97 • Amended thru IOAA, 3 -4 -98; I OBB, 8 -4 -98; l OCC, 4- 20 -99; l ODD, 8 -3 -99 32 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 1 A Crooked Lake Blvd. 13574 Hidden Creek Dr. 13526 Crooked Lake Blvd. ver, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 2828 135 LN. 13564 Hidden Creek Dr. 13611 Bittersweet St. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 2825 135 Cir. 2833 135 Cir. 2815 135 Cir. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 13554 Hidden Creek Dr. 13503 Crooked Lake Blvd. 13544 Hidden Creek Dr. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 13532 Hidden Creek Dr. 2836 135' Cir. 2816 135 Cir. 14 ver, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 2834 135 Cir. 13606 Bittersweet St. RR 1 Box 159A Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Sandstone, MN 55072 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 2811 135 Ave. 2823 135 Ave. 2835 135 Ave. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 2715 134' LN. 13606 Bittersweet St. 2735 134`' LN. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 13453 Crooked Lake Blvd. 13500 Hidden Creek Dr. 2820 135' Ave. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 2705 134' LN. 13563 Crooked Lake Blvd. 2725 134' LN. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident WhI LN. 13443 Crooked Lake Blvd. 2837 135` LN. Awer, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 • q • CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: D. Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner �. SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (02 -06) for repair garage, towing service and outdoor storage at 3118 162 Lane NW for Todd Pallum, Owner of Anytime Towing Services. DATE: May 14", 2002 INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of a repair garage, towing service and outdoor storage in the Hughes Industrial Park. The City of Andover prohibits auto storage and reduction yards. The use of the property may only be limited to repair services. Exterior storage of two or more unlicensed motor vehicles or the remains thereof is prohibited (see attached ordinance). Vehicles • cannot be kept for the purpose of dismantling, sale of parts, sale as scrap, storage, or abandonment. Storage of waste tires on the site is also prohibited. DISCUSSION Applicable Ordinances Ordinance 8 section 5.03 B (attached) regulates Special Use Permits. Ordinance 8 section 7.01 Permitted Uses Ordinance 8 section 7.04 Uses Excluded Ordinance 8 section 8.01 Exterior Storage Comparison of Proposal to Applicable Ordinances Based on the nature of the business and the number of vehicles proposed to be stored on the property, staff has determined that this request will not meet the City's requirements. Ordinance 8, Section 7.01 Permitted Uses allows repair services in industrial districts however, Section 7.04 Uses Excluded prohibits auto storage and reduction yards, junk yards and exterior storage of waste tires. The use of the property would be limited to repair services only. Ordinance 8 section 8.01 allows exterior storage of no more than two unlicensed motor vehicles or the remains thereof. Vehicles cannot be kept for the purpose of dismantling, sale of parts, sale as scrap, storage, or abandonment. Staff is recommending denial of the requested special use permit. The site was inspected on April 24, 2002 and the following substandard items were noted: 1. The pole buildings do not comply with the uniform building code requirements for the type of business that is proposed. The structures will need to be brought in to compliance for the appropriate occupancy group before they can be occupied. The Building Department has indicated that an architect will need to design the improvements. I strongly suggest working with the Building and Fire departments to determine the level of improvements that will be necessary. 2. The exterior materials of the buildings do not conform to the City's architectural standards. Also, the easterly building does not meet the side yard setback requirement of 10 feet. These building are nonconforming structures. In the event that the buildings are damaged beyond 50% of their value they must be reconstructed with approved materials and in conformance with required setbacks. The parking area does not meet current standards. A paved parking area with curb and gutter will be required. The number of parking stalls is based on the square footage of structures on the property. Auto repair establishments are required to provide eight parking stalls plus one stall per 800 square feet after the first 1,000 square feet. This yields a parking requirement of 15 parking stalls. 4. Parking areas are required to provide one foot candle of lighting across the entire parking surface. • 5. There is a large amount of refuse on the property. The site must be cleaned prior to occupancy. 6. A storage container is located on the east side of the property. This structure is not a commercial building and must be removed from the property. Access to the site is restricted by the existing fence. Arrangements will need to be made with the fire department to provide a lock box on site to allow access in case of an emergency. Additional Information The applicant has submitted a brief letter summarizing the details of the proposed towing, repair and impound business. Attachments Resolution Location Map Area Diagram Letter from Applicant Photo • Public Notice —0— • RECOMMENDED ACTION Based on the conflicts with Ordinance 8 and the substandard structural and site issues mentioned above, the Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to recommend denial of a special use permit for a repair garage, towing service and outdoor storage at 3118 162 Lane NW (02 -06). Respectfully submitted, D. Tyler Mckay Cc: Todd Pallum, 21345 Quapaw Street • • CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION DENYING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF TODD PALLUM FOR A REPAIR GARAGE, TOWING SERVICE AND OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3118 162 LANE NW. WHEREAS, Todd Pallum has requested a Special Use Permit for repair garage, towing servie and outdoor storage for property located at 3118 162" Lane NW, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request do not meet the criteria of Ordinance 8 section 5.03 B, Ordinance 8 section 7.01, Ordinance 8 section 7.04, Ordinance 8 section 8.01, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the • Special Use Permit request; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and denies the Special Use Permit for a repair garage, towing service and outdoor storage on said property with the following findings: 1. While Ordinance 8 Section 7.01, Permitted Uses does allow repair services in industrial districts, Ordinance 7.04 Uses Excluded prohibits auto storage and reduction yards, junk yards and exterior storage of waste tires. 2. Ordinance 8 Section 8.01, allows exterior storage of not more than two unlicensed motor vehicles or the remains thereof. Vehicles cannot be kept for the purpose of dismantling, sale of parts, sale as scrap, storage, or abandonment. The pole buildings do not comply with the uniform building code requirements for the type of business that is proposed. The structures will need to be brought in to compliance for the appropriate occupancy group before they can be occupied. The Building Department has indicated that an architect will need to design the improvements. I strongly suggest working with the Building and Fire departments to determine the level of improvements that will be necessary. 4. The exterior materials of the buildings do not conform to the City's architectural standards. Also, the easterly building does not meet the side yard setback requirement of 10 feet. These building are nonconforming structures. In the event that the buildings are damaged beyond 50% of their value they must be reconstructed with approved materials and in conformance with required setbacks. 5. The parking area does not meet current standards. A paved parking area with curb and gutter will be required. The number of parking stalls is based, on the square footage of structures on the property. Auto repair establishments are required to provide eight parking stalls plus one stall per 800 square feet after the first 1,000 square feet. This yields a parking requirement of 15 parking stalls. 6. Parking areas are required to provide one foot candle of lighting across the entire parking surface. 7. There is a large amount of refuse on the property. The site must be cleaned prior to occupancy. 8. A storage container is located on the east side of the property. This structure is not a commercial building and must be removed from the property. 9. Access to the site is restricted by the existing fence. Arrangements will need to be made with the fire department to provide a lock box on site to allow access in case of an emergency. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this of , 2002. • CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor _!�- Todd Pallum Special Use Permit Repair Garage, Towing Service and Outdoor Storage Ym m' Lw a10 aq xA] ]p] N« ]x10 m m aM mm YA Sw NIx 'M 1.11 1® Ims +em nn r® mM an vw mr Aa , Ns F x S � � m xn rers lenz Iola sls « raw n+n Iwa Iel« ]oz ,arm leza wn nm Nm m m as v so ]xn ml xm an C +erlo ss +am Inn am 4I m m MD ny � aI4 x1m aat ]ry 1 ore rexs nm Ipl low xNe Im lame Islx Ieml Ism Iw Ism rsa srtrl r Isa +wr Is4 In10 Isn ' +sxn >4 4e >m m x+« Nls m m a« see m nN Ims zw rms wm LLO +Rq Iwx lar +� su 1 tl°° ]les arm Are sn ml Nn se» leml >a ] " e ]ra x6e Ly Imm 1® ZA 41 I ty am mM1l l4fi ]r'A m AW Itlx Imef a@ All Y IeSA Im ]NE ]1a m 80 IWA m+ LID $1 1®S Aa 18 I«C ]IA 181 YG1 41 aN w+s leo k raw >w I t 1 °r " ns Ns m m m +«zl an +en raw ws I«m ma nm 41 m+ xsN sl an nxs Isla mx s� ]OA Ima yll mu ms Nm m xm Iw +mn xm ]w � Ima nm +mm an m m m lass l4l m m m ]fIY aA NA r]el0 tmlt rmw 1411 Aw aA 141x s aA ,am s tl le4 ? Im are 1 °°�s W 1411 as p � o 2 raw 14n rslr, R • Project Location Map N W-4 8 City of Andover Planning Department 6- Imo ]w Nm Ims +em nn r® an vw mr Aa , Ns F x S � � m xn rers lenz Iola sls « raw n+n Iwa Iel« ,arm leza wn Nm m Na wu t7 +� xIa 3m4 m m VAI as as ]ui MD ny � aI4 x1m aat ]ry rwa ore ImA Iewl ryl0 IpTt AeI W tln vA m Imo mlo +wl Iss ran Isas 141 >w rm 'mn Aa law nm Ipl low xNe Im lame Islx Ieml Ism Iw Ism rsa � Ism Isa +wr Is4 In10 k } 1!6 MA Ym tone IM m m m ]fIY aA NA r]el0 tmlt rmw 1411 Aw aA 141x s aA ,am s tl le4 ? Im are 1 °°�s W 1411 as p � o 2 raw 14n rslr, R • Project Location Map N W-4 8 City of Andover Planning Department 6- - -- - - - - - - - - -= -- ACE 50 ND LANE N Wi, a N89'26'55T 250A0 I � 4 IMP — ' GF so+u Th..NnteNan t • 0noln Yen p�. w tidkolyd, 0.not.. q12 Ad O mortal WM R p lz , .0 PAM a.Q' . 'R. 2 . IPTA j M. Ent 50'" of ft. of In. No 21A99 fn c.o,fnr .l Sselim t4 A Mhn.m<a AND 7h. Cart 200 INt of the of We North 219A99 fn C. t.r'of 5..Ib fly. re W. t.. I I� 3. 95 ACRES � 0R LESS ' I7J,201 SF, MORE M t$ d a f is d oil and dta droinfiNa randb4Pn o , i = 42- Fo Ns purpose of thh ne nssorcN noe oar.'lo d.tmmhex ,nan 'At., etA . t a of NWI /< -5K 16- 7L ^N -R2JW �' fNDO ZONINC . SMAC R O IREMENrc F�l 40 ft md. _ fa 1.0 . Rnr - M fs.f Mhbnom ntbawf nwrY+rmdlfa w ntooNnh" by owreot . xaharea S.tboe llnes are not barn on onf offC nnw for IAA, etra 7hp lo.elion of .e1bor4a " wlbie7 "� to 1% htvpnl.flan and #dlnin9' a Wd.mflon, - Ihanlm tn. mhlnwn ntbaclrt o'. now out the be— ..._ .... - _ 1 hreby Certify OW tm pr d by m, d and .l Miir.mtord Lnd A Rodney N. HW.v10 � W Rep N. IaN7' Do MMWESY Lan sm a L-�77 �K�/►� �PP6� �- 9 April 9, 2002 TO: City of Andover, Planning and Zoning Committee FROM: Anytime Towing and Services RE: 3118 162nd Lane NW (old Ace Solid Waste Facility) My company, Anytime Towing and Services, hereby, requests a license to relocate and operate to the aforementioned site in Andover. My company has been providing towing, impounds and complete vehicle repair, both public and private, for the past 10 years in the Anoka County area. Most of our business is from local shops, insurance companies and service centers. My company impounds motorized vehicles, including semi trucks, snowmobiles, • motorcycles, etc. Turnaround time on most vehicles is 24 to 48 hours. I currently have approximately 25 to 40 vehicles in impound, but as my business grows, so will the number of vehicles. The aforementioned site is fenced in with a shielded cyclone fence. The site is surrounded by existing commercial businesses. I plan to landscape and repaint the buildings. As my business grows in this community, so will job opportunities. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Todd Pallum, Owner Anytime Towing and Services C� —7— ----- I~,. ~,...,.^'''''~_,C- ". :_--, C . fJll1a h -- "'7-:-:- v ~_~... __+. ~ ,,,._.-,,u_, CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTYOFANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA -- ., -. , The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing th --' . at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, May 14,2002 at '. , Andover City Hall, 1685 CrosstoWn Blvd NW, Andover, Minnesota to review a Special Use Permit (02-06) for repair garage, towing service and outdoor storage at 3118 1620d Lane NW for Todd Pallum, on property legally described as follows; The east 250 feet of the west 650 feet of the south 433 feet of the north 2184.99 feet of the west half of the northwest quarter of Section 16, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. All written,and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the proposed application will .be available for review prior to the meeting at City Hall. Please contact D. Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner with any questions at (763) 767-5142. Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 30162 LN. 3125 162 LN. 3149162 nI LN. er, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3098 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3118162 nd LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3138 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 6601 McKinley St. NW Ramsey, MN 55303 Current Resident 3160162 nd LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident 1630 NE. CO. HWY. 10 16191 Round Lake Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident 3121 161" Ave. 14689 Galaxie Ave. Andover, MN 55304 Apple Valley, MN 55124 Current Resident Current Resident 3095 162 LN. 3105 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident 3139 162 LN. 19960 Sweetwater Curve Andover, MN 55304 Shorewood, MN 55331 11 Current Resident 3075 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3017 161" Ave. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 16125 Round Lake Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3115 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 '0 9) CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: D. Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner' SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (02 -07) for retail trade and services in the Industrial Zoning District property located at 3138 162 °d Lane NW for Clarence T. Zuleger. DATE: May 14', 2002 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval of a retail trade and services in the Industrial Zoning District. DISCUSSION • Applicable Ordinances Ordinance 8 section 5.03 B (2) (attached) regulates retail shopping in industrial districts within he City of Andover. Comparison of Proposal to Applicable Ordinances The applicant describes the retail use as limited with hours from approximately 10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Friday and an occasional evening until 8:00 P.M. as needed, and Saturday 10:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. Currently this business is operated from a private home with minimal customer traffic. The building will be used both for producing plaques, trophys, engraving, embroidery, and silk screening as well as retail sale of these items. The applicant plans to renovate the current site including a complete rehabitation the front building and new landscaping to make the property more attractive for customers. This proposed renovation and retail use will have a beneficial effect on the general welfare of surrounding area by increasing property values, aesthetic image of the property and allowing residents better access to this business. The increase in traffic will not be detrimental to neighboring businesses or residents. This property will need to be inspected by the Building Department to find it to be in compliance with the Uniform Building and Fire Codes. This special use permit shall be subject to an annual review. 0 Additional information The applicant has submitted a letter summarizing the details of the proposed business. Attachments Resolution Location Map Letter from Applicant Public Notice RECOMMENDED ACTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to recommend approval of a Special Use Permit for retail trade and services in the Industrial Zoning District for Clarence Zuleger (02 -07), subject to the conditions listed in the proposed resolution. Respectfully submitted, D. Tyl Mckay Cc; Clarence Zuleger, 3495 168"' Lane NW • Z- CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF CLARENCE T. ZULEGER FOR RETAIL TRADE AND SERVICES IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3138 162 LANE NW. WHEREAS, Clarence T. Zuleger has requested a Special Use Permit for retail trade and services in the industrial zoning district for property located at 3138 162 lane NW, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 8 section 5.03 B (2), and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit request; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Special Use Permit for retail trade and services in the industrial zoning district on said property with the following conditions: 1. All aspects of the proposed business shall conform with the requirements of Ordinance No. 8 section 5.03 B (2). 2. Upon sale of the premises for which the Special Use Permit is granted, such Pen shall terminate. 3. This Special Use Permit shall be subject to review at any time the City Council determines this use of the property becomes detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. 4. Subject to property being inspected by the Building Official and Fire Chief and the building being brought into conformance with the current Uniform Building and Fire Codes. 0 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this of , 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER - '3 — • • • ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk 1 4 1. Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Clarence Zuleger Special Use Permit Retail Trade and Services • A W E Project Location Map City of Andover Planning Department -5-- me me w »m me n. as as xem an ar xme A.a as mn am na >=a as mot, an nre na >w >n ImA w nm as en xn sv mro am xem w >w a. as i nm a n ae m as s xm Irn xm ten tole ero 'w lent mre x+m me >m as eue 1® ler ler � Amt leea 1� M x4 a16 ax1 xal nA In1G +Ep nO en � »a loot 1 °n IeN tao mn aee tae an neee xr aw IW nve m xrm aet wI am xfe am wax Ir+ mn xn 1 Iln° am Mm ten ten w am ma w we aw am ten leeu xn m nm mm An Ieo na an nt an an Iw +mm k wu tw em 1 I A, 2 ma »w am mn am apt mx teen A0 +an ni va »m mn xn an ten zrn Ixe4 e� + wn m le8 Al »m »a m exm xem xn +em +em Id sm zmx Imo »m ion an sn xem as 1 ®e wll va +one am »m teas +nn +em mr ' max v +em eeo vies mm me °° Nln nn tw mm mA m xem axe Aia a+a ,na ' n� xM mn xw am xm Iem em Ina elm »» Ina a" an Iola A+A tnm a t� »a aA as p aM p a'G xn i xm wm am +INO Inl 11Va Int LM xJd Inl tpx Ima YD<I IMY +en xle �eml t® Inl Int IIYN m W �+ xm leea tnI we Q >ae ion +sal +e »x Ion +mie ,aoe tnI tNe Ima Y� +Ya S tlW +en +en len Ion len uoe mm 1°n > uu�11 6 y am as an am am mx my am Ivm xm MA am as an tee tw teen lea teal k lem an +eon len wen tole Q iam seen +eem era 73 w 4 LI ,w ,elll • A W E Project Location Map City of Andover Planning Department -5-- ANDOVER AWARDS & EMBROIDERY • formerly Dale's Trophies complete custom embroidery & award service April 29, 2002 Description of request: Request change from light industrial to retail zoning for awards, embroidery and silk screening business This business is currently in a private home with minimal customer traffic. The majority of our business consists of phone or fax orders that are delivered to our customers. A small percentage of our customers come to our home by appointment to place or to pick up their orders. By moving to a separate building we hope to increase our total business which will increase the number of customers coming to our shop. We also would like the option of carrying some decorated, embroidered and silk screened, clothing and sports wear for retail sale on the floor. At this time our plan is to have limited retail hours, approximately 10 -6 Monday through Friday with an occasional evening until • 8 PM as needed, and Saturday 10 -2. Another idea we are considering for future expansion is the addition of limited sporting goods, softball bats, baseball gloves etc. In addition to the space for retail sales we will be using the building for the production side of our business. This consists of plaque and trophy assembly, engraving, embroidery, silk screening, and heat transfer. We anticipate the majority of our business to continue to be to returning customers that are placing large orders. Our plans to renovate the current site are to completely rehab the front building on this site. It currently is not usable. We plan to take down the cement addition on the back of the building and add a 30 x 40 foot (1200 square feet) slab on grade wood structure addition. This addition will have space for a bathroom; a small kitchen area to house a microwave and refrigerator, an area for: engraving and assembly of plaques and trophies; the silk screening process including a computer, silk screening equipment, a wash tub area; embroidery machines and space for storage. There will be a single size, 10' overhead, garage door on the back of this addition to allow easy access for equipment and supplies as well as a service door. M After complete renovation, floors, walls, windows, ceiling, heating plant, plumbing, electrical and roof, the existing part of the building will house a 880 square foot retail space, a front counter, and office space. The basic equipment used in our business is computers, 2 single head embroidery machines; a silk screening press, dryer, light station, wash tub, heat transfer press, a table saw for trophy columns, an engraving lathe, hand engraving machines, and hand tools. The exterior of the current building and the new addition will be sided with a maintenance free exterior. We will maintain ample space for parking and the building will be handicap accessible. We will add landscaping as the site will allow to make the property attractive and welcoming to the neighborhood and our customers. Signage will most likely include a yard sign at the front of the property as well as a sign with a light on it on the front of the building. A purchase agreement for this property has been accepted pending approval of a retail conditional use permit being granted. We maintain the right to withdraw this purchase agreement if we do not have the option of retail use of the front building. The back building on the lot, a steel pole barn and cement block building, will be • maintained and rented as light industrial or storage. After closing on the property we will apply and follow all permits and building codes as required by the city of Andover for the addition and renovation. 3495168 Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 763- 753 -0263 phone & fan, Clarence & Barb Zuleger, Owners L X� L Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 3062 LN. 3125 162 LN. 3149162 nd LN. An ver, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3098162 nd LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3118 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3138 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 6601 McKinley St. NW Ramsey, MN 55303 Current Resident 3160 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident 1630 NE. CO. HWY. 10 16191 Round Lake Blvd. Fridley, MN 55432 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident 3121 161 Ave. 14689 Galaxie Ave. 10 ver, MN 55304 Apple Valley, MN 55124 Current Resident Current Resident 3095 162 LN. 3105 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident Current Resident 3139 162 LN. 19960 Sweetwater Curve Andover, MN 55304 Shorewood, MN 55331 is Current Resident 3075 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3017 161" Ave. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 16125 Round Lake Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 Current Resident 3115 162 LN. Andover, MN 55304 —/0— DRAFT (This is a preliminary preview of what will be coming up on the May 28, 2002 agenda Subject to change) Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda May 28, 2002 Andover City Hall 7.00 n.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes — May 14, 2002 PUBLIC HEARING: Amend Ordinance 8, Section 8 - Performance Standards. To establish standards for sod to be installed on all residential lots in urban areas. Staff report by Tyler Mckay, Associate Planner. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Amend Ordinance 8, Section 4.05 - Accessory Buildings and Structures to limit the size of the accessory buildings allowed on urban residential lots that are one (1) acre or less in size. Staff report by • Courtney Bednarz, City Planner. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Amend Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 (Minimum District Provisions) to reduce the interior sideyard setbacks for accessory structures in the R4 zoning district from 10 feet to 5 feet. Staff report by Courtney Bednarz, City Planner. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to change land use designations for various properties in the City. Also consideration will be given to add a new category of Limited Commercial (LC) to the land use designations to establish office park areas in the City. Also consider allowing some sites to have a dual land use designation, such as LC/URM to allow the site to be zoned for either offices or for medium density residential. Staff report by Will Neumeister, Community Development Director. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: Amend the Zoning Ordinance to consider the following changes: Removing "Service Stations" and "Twenty -four hour continuous operations" from uses allowed as Special Uses in the Limited Business (LB) Zoning District • Exclude "Service Stations" from the retail trade and services definition from ,s uses allowed in the Neighborhood Business (NB) Zoning District. • Add language to the Neighborhood Business (NB) Zoning District that would limit service stations in this zone to sites that are two acres or larger as a Special Use. Staff report by Will Neumeister, Community Development Director. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Amend the Official Zoning Map to rezone property from Neighborhood Business (NB) to either Multiple Dwelling (M -2) or Limited Business (LB). The site is located east of Hanson Boulevard, north of 138th Lane. Staff report by Courtney Bednarz, City Planner. 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Amend the Official Zoning Map to rezone property from Neighborhood Business (NB) to Multiple Dwelling Low Density (M -1). Staff report by Courtney Bednarz, City Planner. 10. PUBLIC HEARING: Amend the Official Zoning Map to rezone property from Neighborhood Business (NB) to Multiple Dwelling (M -2). Staff report by Courtney Bednarz, City Planner. 11. Other Business 12. Adjournment • e,�r:,