Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/12/02CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MfNNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda February 12, 2002 Andover City Hall 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes January 22, 2002: I Public Hearing: Lot Split (02 -01)'to create two rural residential lots for Matt and Tara Kuker for property located at 16055 Makah Street NW. 4. Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (02 -03) for a home occupation (professional office) in an accessory building at 3482 165`h Lane NW for Mark Hedin. 5. Other Business 6. Photograph of Commission for City Newsletter 7. Adjournment . • e CITY of ANDOVER February 12,2002 2. Approval of Minutes Planning Courtney Bednarz Reauest The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to approve the minutes from the January 22, 2002 meeting. e e ----- --- e e e --------- ,-- . . . . . PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMisSION MEETING ..:: JAIYUARY 22,2002 . The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planiring and ZOnll1gCommission was calledto order by Chairperson jay Squires on January 22, 2002,7:01 p.m.,~t the Andover . City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Bou1evard NW, Andover, Mimiesota. Commissioners present: ChahpersonJay. Squires, Commissioners Tim KirchofI> Mark Hedin, Douglas Falk, Larry Dalien, and Dean Daninger. . .' Commissioners-aOsent: Commissioner Rex Greenwald, -- Also present: . City Planner, Courtney Bednarz Planning futel11, Jason Angell Others. . APPROVAL OF MINUTES .. Sommissioner Kirchoff requested on pagell, fourthparagraph, last 'sentence, to be amended as follows: "He mentionl:ldthat thisproposahvould be better than apartments, especiaHysince the homes are garage free from the street", Motion by Daninger, seconded by Hedin, to approve the minutes as amended. . Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays,l-abse:htvote.' ., PUBLIC HEARING: '. LOt SPLIT (02-01) TO CREATE TWO RURAL .. RESIDENTIAL LOTS FOR MA T1'AND TARA KUKER FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16055MAKAH STREETNW Mr.Bednarzrequested this item betableddueto further information that needs to be obtained. . He indicated this would be renoticed .for a future meeting, . e Motion by Hedin, seconded by Daninger, totable this item. Motion c,amed ona 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — January 22, 2002 Page 2 PUBLICREARING. LOT SPLIT (02 -02) TO CREATE TWO RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS FOR TONI GRUNDSTROM FOR PROPERTYLOCA TED AT 17729 EIDELWEISS STREET NW Mr. Bednarz explained that the Commission is being asked to recommend approval of a proposal to divide the subject property into two rural residential lots with variances to the 2.5 acre minimum lot size and 300 foot lot width. One of the lots would contain the existing house and detached garage. He explained due to circumstances beyond the control of the applicants, the house could no longer meet their needs, which require a fully accessible house. It was the property owners desire to remain in this neighborhood where they have lived for 21 years. It was applicant's intent to sell the existing home and for a new accessible home to be constructed for the applicant on the new lot. Mr. Bednarz went on to review the ramifications of approving variances to the minimum lot width and lot size requirements. He stated findings for approving these variances must be unique to this property and avoid contradicting the intent of the R -1 Zoning District. Commissioner Hedin asked if there had been other lots where variances of this type been made. Mr. Bednarz replied there had been variances granted in the past that had different circumstances. He stated it was very important they find findings that would separate this variance from others. Commissioner Falk asked if this property was in the MUSA. Mr. Bednarz replied it had a private well and septic system. Commissioner Hedin inquired about the plans for the lot located south of 177` Avenue. Mr. Bednarz replied it appeared there was a lot approximately 15 acres in size, but he had not received any formal request to develop that lot. Commissioner Falk asked about the payment of park dedication fee. Mr. Bednarz replied the fee would be $1,700.00 for a new lot. Motion by Dalien, seconded by Kirchoff, to open - the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Chair Squires indicated the Commission had received letters from the residents in applicant's neighborhood who supported applicant's request. No letters were received opposing the request. Mr. Bednarz replied they had also received another letter from a resident prior to tonight's meeting in favor of the request and distributed it to the Commission for their review. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — January 22, 2002 • Page 3 Mike Grundstrom, applicant, indicated their request was for staying in the neighborhood, and he believed their property was large enough to build another home on it. He stated the home they had built 20 years ago was not built for someone in a wheelchair, and it would be a hardship on them to make their existing home accessible. Bruce Watson, 17793 Gladiola Street, read a written statement from Mrs. Grundstrom regarding her disability and why they were requesting the lot split. Mr. Watson stated the Grundstrom's had been in the neighborhood for 20 years and they were good neighbors. He stated the neighborhood would not be a neighborhood without them. He asked the Commission to approve the Grundstrom's request. He stated they wanted to keep Mr. and Mrs. Grundstrom as neighbors. Motion by Daninger, seconded by Falk, to close the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Commissioner Hedin asked if the lot was split, would there be any side yard setback variances. Mr. Bednarz replied there would not be variances for existing structures. Commissioner Dalien asked if the building inspector had checked the lots to determine if there was enough space for a second septic system. Mr. Bednarz replied this was not a • situation where borings were required due to the elevation of the property. It was large enough to accommodate a second septic system. Chair Squires asked how they knew that without doing a more detailed survey. Mr. Bednarz replied it was based on staff's prior experience as well as the elevation of the property. Commissioner Daninger asked where was the nearest lot that was for sale that a home could be built on. Mr. Bednarz stated he did not know what properties were on the market in that neighborhood. Mr. Grundstrom stated there was no property for sale. Commissioner Daninger asked if there was any build able space accessible from 177 Avenue. Mr. Bednarz responded he did not have that information. Mr. Grundstrom stated all of the property south of 177` Avenue was owned by one person, and that person had never expressed any interest in marketing the property. Chair Squires expressed concerns regarding the standards as to when a variance was justified and dividing a 2 -' /z acre lot in half. He stated he did not see the undue hardship under the Ordinance based on the topography or other circumstance with the property, but • he did believe their request should be granted due to a personal hardship. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —January 22, 2002 Page 4 Chair Squires requested the City Attorney research how the Fair Housing Act would apply, and if it was approved by the City Attorney, he did not believe the Commission would have any problem with granting this variance request. If this did apply under the Fair Housing Act, this would eliminate setting any precedence in the future. Motion by Hedin, seconded by Dalien, to recommend to the City Council that circumstances exist warranting the granting of the variance, but requested the City Attorney research if the Fair Housing Act would apply to granting this variance. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Mr. Bednarz replied this would be presented to the City Council on February 19, 2002. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT (02 -01) TO RELOCATE AN EXISTING HOUSE TO PROPER TY LOCA TED AT 14272 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW r� U Mr. Angel explained that the Commission is being asked to recommend approval of relocation of an existing house to property located at 14272 Round Lake Boulevard NW. He indicated the property was currently zoned R-4, Single Family -Urban and was approximately 0.4 acres. A garage was currently located on the property and would remain. He reviewed the applicable ordinances regulating the special use permit process. • He stated the structure would be located to meet the requirements of the single - family urban (R -4) zoning district. He indicated the properties to the north and west were currently zoned R -3, Single Family- Suburban, and the properties to the south and east were currently zoned R -4, Single Family -Urban. Mr. Angel indicated the proposed home was an approximately 1100 square foot rambler constructed in the 1980's. All windows in the home (except for the four season porch) would be replaced and vinyl siding would be installed. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if there was a home on this property previously. Mr. Bednarz replied it had been subdivided previously. Commissioner Daninger inquired about the square footage on the existing homes in the neighborhood. Mr. Bednarz replied 1100 square feet would be compatible with the neighborhood. Motion by Daninger, seconded by Dalien, to open the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Jeff Kramer, son of applicant, stated they had no intention of moving a "dump"; it would be a nice looking home and they were willing to work with staff. E Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — January 22, 2002 is Page 5 Christina Kramer indicated she owned the property and inquired what R -4 zoning was. Mr. Angel explained what R -4 and R -3 zoning was and the requirements of each. Motion by Kirchoff, seconded by Hedin, to close the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if there was an existing access to Round Lake on this property. Mr. Bednarz replied access had been granted with the lot split. Commissioner Daninger asked if this was the first time the home had been moved. Ms. Kramer replied the home had not been moved previously. However, this had been applied for moving it in the past, but they had been unable to meet the time restraints with winter weather setting in. Motion by Falk, seconded by Kirchoff, to recommend approval to relocate an existing house to property located at 14272 Round Lake Boulevard NW. Motion carried on a 6- ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Mr. Bednarz stated this would come before the City Council at the February 19, 2002 meeting. • PUBLIC HEARING: RESIDENTIAL SKETCH PLAN FOR A TOWNHOUSE PROJECT FOR HANS HAGEN HOMES AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2054 COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD NW Mr. Bednarz explained that the Commission is being asked to informally advise the subdivider of the extent to which the plan conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, design standards of City, County, State and Federal agencies and possible modifications necessary to secure approval of the plan. Mr. Bednarz reviewed the Ordinance requirements, access, surrounding properties, and the townhome design and architecture. Commissioner Dalien asked if this property was excluded from the townhome moratorium. Mr. Bednarz responded it had been excluded. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if the bump outs were harder to maintain. Mr. Bednarz replied they would have to be worked around and they were harder to maintain. In terms of plowing, there would be no parking allowed in the winter under the existing ordinance. Motion by Hedin, seconded by Daninger, to open the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Hans Hagen, Hans Hagen Homes, 941 NE Hillman Trail, Fridley, indicated this • development was not a joint venture with United Properties. They were going to develop the residential development and United Properties was the developer of any commercial Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — January 22, 2002 Page 6 properties. He summarized the size of the townhomes. He stated the main loop street would allow a 36 -foot width, which would allow for sufficient parking on the side. This would also allow truck traffic and emergency vehicle access. He stated one of the goals was to have as much green space as possible and this could be accomplished with bump outs. He acknowledged this would take more maintenance with the bump outs, but the main road could be plowed first and the bump outs done at a later time. He indicated the site was generally level. It was a sandy site with wetlands to both the west and east. • He stated the homeowners living on the south side would be looking at the ends of the buildings. He indicated those residents would not be looking at a row of townhomes. This was done to accommodate a better view for the residential homes and to save as many trees as possible. He indicated they had spoken with the Fire Marshall regarding emergency vehicle access and had made accommodations for emergency vehicles being able to turn around. He stated they had prepared a market study there was a great demand for main level living. He requested an amendment to their proposal to a 25 -foot setback from the building to the south property line, which would accommodate a larger pad for main level living, instead of a 45 -foot setback. He also requested a 20 -foot setback to the west to shift the patio area to a different spot on the site. He stated the homes would be in the $175,000 to $200,000 range. He indicated the townhomes would all have exterior patios. He stated the homeowners association would be maintaining the interior space, the exterior of the buildings, and green space areas. The townhome association would be • responsible for all plowing of driveways and sidewalks. He indicated they were attempting to make the back of the buildings just as attractive as the front of the buildings by improving the architecture. Commissioner Falk asked if the 25 -foot setback would affect one building or the whole property. Mr. Hagen replied the setback would be the same for each building. Two buildings would be moved south 15 feet to accommodate wider units. Commissioner Daninger inquired about parking in the aisles. Mr. Hagen stated there would be no parking in the aisles. The vehicles would have to be kept in the garages. Debra Sodenberg, 2121 135' Lane, asked what the square footage of the townhomes was going to be. Mr. Hagen replied they would be approximately 1700 square feet. Ms. Sodenberg asked if the developer had a start date. Mr. Hagen replied they would like to start early this summer with a completion date of 2 years. Ms. Sodenberg asked if the development was going to be phased in. Mr. Hagen responded the buildings would be phased in. Ms. Sodenberg requested a copy of the materials provided to the Commission. Mr. Hagen stated he would be glad to send her a copy of all of the material if she left him her address. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —January 22, 2002 . Page 7 Ms. Sodenberg stated for 8 years they had been concerned as to what was going to be in that area, and she was happy with this proposal. However, she expressed concern regarding the 25 -foot setback. She stated the proposed 45 -foot setback was a more reasonable buffer. Ms. Thao, 2097 135` Lane, stated they had small children in the neighborhood and indicated the townhome development was a nice buffer zone between the commercial and residential areas. She indicated she had attempted to sell her home earlier this year and everyone that looked at her home expressed concern as to what was going to go in on the property behind them. She appreciated the effort to save trees. However, she expressed concern regarding the 25 -foot setback and would like to see the original setback proposal. She welcomed this development into her neighborhood. Motion by Kirchoff, seconded by Daninger, to close the public hearing at 8:08 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Commissioner Hedin asked if there would be an affect if the setback would be left as originally proposed. Mr. Hagen responded that based on the comments, they would try to work within the original setback. • Mr. Bednarz indicated the standard setback would be 40 feet. Chair Squires replied varying the setbacks should be preserved to make it more aesthetically pleasing, but the developer should try to work within the 40 -foot setback. Mr. Bednarz replied this would only affect a couple of the units. Commissioner Falk asked the developer if they had done bump -out streets before. Mr. Hagen replied they had not done bump -outs before, and this was done at staff's request. Mr. Bednarz responded the original proposal was to have nose -in parking so they wanted to try and break that up so it did not look like apartment parking; this was a compromise that was made. Chair Squires requested the Public Works Department be informed about the bump outs and to obtain their comments regarding the maintenance of the bump outs. Commissioner Hedin inquired about the possibility of tot lots. Mr. Bednarz replied the south central portion of the plat was where the open space part of the development would be and that area may remain open space or it could be a site for a tot lot. This would be up to the townhome association. OTHER BUSINESS is Mr. Bednarz updated the Commission on planning items. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — January 22, 2002 Page 8 • Mr. Squires stated this was Mr. Dalien's last meeting and thanked him for all of his contributions and hard work. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Dalien, seconded by Hedin, to adjourn the meeting at 8:21 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent vote. Respectfully Submitted, Kathleen Altman, Recording Secretary Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • • • CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. ? ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 ? (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 ? WWW.CLANDOVER MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Plano* SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Lot Split (02 -01) to create two rural residential lots at Property located at 16055 Makah Street NW for Matt and Tara Kuker DATE: Februrary 12, 2002 INTRODUCTION The property owner is seeking approval of a proposal to divide the subject property into two rural residential lots. The existing house and detached garage will remain on one of the lots. • DISCUSSION The property owner has still not demonstrated buildabilty as required for rural lots. It is recommended that this item be tabled or that the Commission recommend denial and forward this item to the City Council. ResRectm1y submitted, ourtn ednarZ Cc: Matt and Tara Kuker, 16055 Makah Street NW • e s CITY OF ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. ? ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 ? (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755-8923? WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Courtney Bednarz, City Plann&,,, SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (02 -03) for a home occupation professional office operated from an accessory structure for property located at 3482 165`' Lane NW— Mark Hedin. DATE: February 12, 2002 INTRODUCTION The applicant is seeking approval of a home occupation to operate a professional office out of a • proposed detached accessory building on the subject property. The attachments describe the location and provide a Boor plan for the proposed structure. The applicant has indicated the building will be fmished to match the exterior of the existing house. DISCUSSION The proposed detached building would be 768 square feet in size and include general storage space as well as office space. The structure would meet the accessory structure requirements of Ordinance 8 in terms of size, location and exterior materials. The floor plan indicates that approximately 363 square feet of the proposed building would be used for office space. The office use would include visits from clients. Parking for clients is available in the driveway. The driveway is approximately 80 feet long. Several letters of support for the proposal were submitted to the city and are attached. The letters represent properties on either side and across the street from the subject property. Applicable Ordinances Ordinance 8 Section 4.30 regulates home occupations. 0 • 4.30 Home Occupations. (A) Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to prevent competition with business districts and to provide a means through the establishment of specific standards and procedures by which home occupations can be conducted in residential neighborhoods without jeopardizing the health, safety and general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, this Section is intended to provide a mechanism enabling the distinction between permitted home occupations and non- conforming or customarily "more sensitive" home occupations, so that non- conforming home occupations may be allowed through an administrative process rather than a legislative hearing process. (B) Procedures and Required Permits. (1) Permitted Home Occupations. All home occupations which conform to all of the following provisions may be conducted entirely within the grin_ cipaF structure. Home occupations shall not be conducted in a garage or accessory building unless the property owner conducting the home occupation has obtained a Special Use Permit as stated in Section 4.30(B)(2) or has obtained a Special Home Occupation Permit as stated in Section 4.30(B)(3). (a) The number of employees shall be limited to one (1) person on site in addition to family members. (b) The area within the principle structure used by the home occupation shall not exceed twenty (20 %) percent of the dwelling's livable floor area. Basements may be included if they meet all Uniform Building Code requirements. (c) On -site sales shall be prohibited, except those clearly incidental to services provided in the dwelling. (d) Any interior or exterior alterations of a dwelling for a home occupation shall be prohibited, except those customarily found in a dwelling. (e) Vehicles associated with a home occupation shall be limited to one (1) vehicle on the premises [said vehicle shall not exceed gross capacity weight of twelve thousand (12,000) pounds]. (f) Signs shall be regulated as stated in Section 8.07. • (g) Permitted home occupations include and are limited to: art or photo studio, dressmaking, secretarial services, professional offices, repair services, or teaching services limited to three (3) students at any one time and similar uses. (h) No home occupation shall produce light glare, noise, odor or vibration that will in any way have an objectionable effect upon adjacent or nearby property. (i) The home occupation shall be conducted by at least one (1) member of the family who resides in the dwelling unit. 0) The home occupation shall meet all applicable fire and building codes. (2) Home Occupations Located in an Accessory Structure and/or Requiring Exterior Storage. A Special Use Permit shall be required for the following home occupations that are located in an accessory structure or detached garage and/or requires exterior storage: to a) Cabinet Making. b) Woodworking. c) Repair Services d) Similar Uses as those stated above (a-c). These home occupations shall be subject to the following conditions: a) The size of the lot or parcel of land shall be three (3a.) acres or larger. b) The combined square footage of the accessory structure and/or outside storage area utilized by the home occupation shall not exceed eight hundred (800 s.f.) square feet. c) Setbacks of the accessory building and outside storage area shall be of a magnitude found necessary by the City, but in no case shall it be less than one hundred (100) feet front yard setback, thirty (30) feet side yard setback and fifty (50) feet rear yard setback or as required in Section 6.02. d) The outside storage area and all vehicles, materials and equipment being stored on -site shall be fenced, landscaped and screened in such a manner as to prevent it from being visible at any time of the year from road right -of- ways, public properties and surrounding properties. i Staff Recommendation The proposed home occupation would not adversely affect the health safety or welfare of the neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of this request. Attachments Resolution Location Map Site Plan Floor Plan Letters from Neighborhood ACTION REQUIRED Recommend approval or denial of this Special Use Permit request. RAbur fu y submitted, Bedna rz 9 11 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF MARK HEDIN FOR A HOME OCCUPATION PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO BE OPERATED OUT OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3482 165'' LANE, WHEREAS, Mark Hedin has requested a Special Use Permit for a home occupation professional office to be operated out of an accessory structure on property located at 3482 165' Lane NW; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed th r equest and-has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 8, Section 4.30: • WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Special Use Permit on said property permitting a home occupation professional office to be conducted from an accessory structure that meets all city requirements and is constructed to match the exterior materials of the principal structure subject to the following: The applicant shall demonstrate approval from the architectural review board as required by covenants that are recorded with the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this_day of 1 2002. CITY OF ANDOVER • ATTEST: Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk Mark Hedin Special Use Permit Request Home Occupation in an Accessory Structure Location Map N W E S City of Andover Planning Department 9 O �� cn 6 0 . f-1 L V S S }l t L 'i L� � v �oi�M • . Pilo sr'£cT4s' ! �. i rtTiriow • : oofc - S v N A i f� ryLL r r'• O 1 _C w� W J �- o / Z Date: l • To: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner Dear Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, Regarding the Special Use permit request of Mark Hedin for a home occupation at 3482 165' Lane NW: I have no objections to allowing Mark Hedin to use part of his detached garage as professional office space for meeting his clients and conducting his business. I understand that normal office hours will be weekdays between 8:00 am and 9:00 p.m. Sincerely, Name: Address: `� (, �� L- , • • �� 5 r r c k 3 f�, Date: `— L5 • To: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner Dear Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, Regarding the Special Use permit request of Mark Hedin for a home occupation at 3482 165` Lane NW: I have no objections to allowing Mark Hedin to use part of his detached garage as professional office space for meeting his clients and conducting his business. I understand that normal office hours will be weekdays between 8:00 am and 9:00 p.m. Sincerely, Name: 7 eScf1., Address: 3 (i 6d 9 bS L IV W o� s' D f..✓ � J Date: 1 To: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner Dear Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, Regarding the Special Use permit request of Mark Hedin for a home occupation at 3482 165 Lane NW: I have no objections to allowing Mark Hedin to use part of his detached garage as professional office space for meeting his clients and conducting his business. I understand that normal office hours will be weekdays between 8:00 am and 9:00 p.m. Sincerely, Name: A. PcYxkr. Address: 1C�5�� Si luerc��1 S� b� l� ��ILC�IEf tq&) S5 "3c� rR F t S Y \\ IL 1 0 w Date: !1 316- Z - TO: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner Dear Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, Re garditlg the Special Use permit. request of Mark Hedin for a home occupation at 3482 165` Lane NW: I have no objections to allowing Mark Hedin to use part of his detached garage as professional office Space for meeting his clients and conducting his business. I understand that normal office hours will be weekdays between 8:00 am and 9:00 p.rn. Sincerely, Address: � 23 -16- 5-17;1 & 1A1, /4,d" z__�3 fi i n q' l� Y Date: To: Courtney Bednarz, City Planner Dear Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, Regarding the Special Use permit request of Mark Hedin for a home occupation at 3482 165` Lane NW: 1 have no objections to allowing Mark Hedin to use part of his detached garage as professional office space for meeting his clients and conducting his business. I understand that normal office hours will be weekdays between 8:00 am and 9:00 p.m. Sinccrely, Name: J J Address: �j � �.J; � L : N—/ 7 is 0 11 �L b`a v�. YS i y