Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 14, 1980 o o Call to order Approval of minutes l. Cown. 113-80-6 2. Cown. 116-80-5 3. Cown. 115-80-3 4. Cown. /19-80-1 5. Cown. 119-80-2 6. Cown. 1110-80-2 7. Cown. 118-80-5 8. Cown. 118-80-10 9. Cown. #8';'80-12 10. COIIlIll. 119-78-6 o o 0 ~ 01 ANDOVER REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 14, 1980 7:30 P.M. o Florian Backowski Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing Rosella's Addition Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing Andover Community Shopping Center Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing Wm, C. Rademacher Special Use Permit Public Hearing North Suburban Praise Fellowship Church Special Use Permit Public Hearing Kim Sai Sia House Moving Permit Dog Bite Ordinance Ordinance 8, Sections 7.01 & 3.02 Multiple Conversion Ordinance Rum River Scenic River Ordinance .' o o 0 ~ 05 ANDOVER o o REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 14, 1980 MINUTES The regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairperson d'Arcy Bosell at 7:32 P.M., Tuesday, October 14, 1980 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W., Anoka, Minnesota. Commissioners Present: Kishel, Scherer, Anstett, JOhnson, Lobb Commissioners Absent: Apel Also Present: Larry Winner, City Engineer; Florian Backowski; Rosella Sonsteby; Wayne Anderson, Wm. C. Rademacher & Associates; Ed Ames, O.S.M., George Ridge, North Suburban Praise Fellowship Church; Dwight Denyes, Counselor Realty; Paul Cavner, Adams Associates; Kim Sai Sia; interested residents Approval of Minutes September 23, 1980 MOTION by written. Kishel. Lobb, seconded by Anstett that the minutes of September 23, 1980 be approved as Vote on motion: Yes - Anstett, Lobb, Bosell, Johnson; Present _ Scherer; Abstain _ Florian Backowski Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #3-80-6) Chairperson Bosell reopened the public hearing. Larry Winner, City Engineer reviewed his letter regarding the revised plat. The only item left open was to show the right-of-way width and surfacing of Dakota Street. The soil borings have been received and are satisfactory. The grading plan is also satisfactory. Chairperson Bosell noted that a letter indicating the County Highway Department's approval must be obtained. Florian Backowski - stated that he talked with Mr. Redepenning of the Highway Deparment and Mr. Redepenning indicated that there would be no problem with the plat and that a letter to the City was not necessary. Chairperson Bosell told Mr. Backowski that we must have a letter from the County. She also noted that our ordinance states that no lots can front on County roads. This will either have to be mentioned in the motion or a variance would be required. Commissioner Kishel stated that it's standard procedure for the county to request additional easement along county roads. Usually they ask for 60 feet from the centerline plus a 15 foot utility easement. On 7th Avenue, the County has been requesting a 15 foot utility and drainage easement. It was mentioned that this property is part of a Registered Land Survey and Mr. Kishel was Oasked why the county didn't take any easements at that time. Mr. Kishel noted that the county cannot ask for a utility easement on a Registered Land Survey. Commissioner Anstett stated that according to Ordinance 10, a variance would be required for the lots fronting on county roads. --- -- ---- Pl' . . d Z . /"' . r'\ . ro:"ln~ng an on~n1.. /mluss'-..../ Meet~ng October 14, 1980 - M~nutes Page 2 () o MOTION by Anstett, seconded by Kishel to close the public hearing. Motion carried , ,unanimously. ~J Commissioner Kishel asked if the elevations are adequate. Mr. Winner noted that some fill will be required and that the three houses to be built will all be walkouts. Commissioner Kishel questioned what the water table is. Mr. Winner stated that it varies, but the average is about 860. According to the soil borings, Tract B showed no ground water at a 12~ foot depth and Tract C also showed no ground water at 12~ feet. MOTION by Lobb, seconded by Johnson that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat of Florian Backowski on the property described as: That part of the N~ of the SE~ of Section 18, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the Southwest corner of the NE~ of the SW~ of said Section 18; thence on an assumed bearing of East along the south line of said NE~ of the SW~ a distance of 278.27 feet; thence north 2 degrees 45 minutes West a distance of 165 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said NE~ of the SW~ a distance of 396 feet; thence North 2 degrees 45 minutes west a distance of 326.04 feet; thence south 58 degrees 00 minutes east a distance of 410.06 feet; thence North 47 degrees 00 minutes east a distance of 195.36 feet; thence north 59 degrees 30 minutes east a distance of 266.22 feet; thence North 0 degrees 16 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 75.24 feet; thence south 79 degrees 00 minutes east a distance of 59.62 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing south 79 degrees 00 minutes east a distance of 114.62 feet; thence South 61 degrees 30 minutes East a distance of 150.48 feet; thence South 35 degrees 00 minutes East a distance of 126.06 feet; thence South 46 degrees 30 minutes East a distance of 273.65 feet; thence North 34 degrees 10 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 686.76 feet; thence north 78 degrees 43 minutes 26 seconds west a distance of 917.49 feet to the east line of County State Aid Highway No.7; thence south 0 degrees 14 minutes 43 seconds West, along the East line of County State Aid Highway No. 7 a distance of 362.28 feet to the actual point of beginning. Subject to easement for road purposes on County Road No. 58., for the following reasons: 1) A public hearing was held. There was no public opposition; 2) The plat meets the ordinances of the city and is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; 3) The plat has been reviewed by the City Engineer and meets with his approval; 4) The Commission has received a decision from the Park Board for cash in lieu of land; 5) Approval of the plat is contingent upon the following being shown on the plat: a) the width and type of surfacing of Dakota Street; b) a 60 foot right-of-way plus a 15 foot drainage and utility easement on County Road 58; c) an additional 5 foot utility and drainage easement on 7th Avenue; 6) A variance will be required for all three lots fronting on County roads pursuant to Ordinance 10, Section 9.02, Subsection C. A hardship was created as there are no other streets for the lots to front on. Motion carried unanimously. This will go to the City Council on their first meeting in November. Rosella's Addition Preliminary Plat Continued Public Hearing (Comm. #6-80-5) Chairperson Bosell reopened the public hearing. She noted that a revised letter has been received from the City Engineer and a recommendation has been received from the Park Board. Mr. Winner reviewed his letter regarding the revised plat. He noted that he has received a final street and storm sewer plan. Chairperson Bosell noted that a variance will be required as all of the owner's contiguous /-ryroperty has not been platted. The reason for this being Ms. Sonsteby owns too much ~~roperty to plat. She also noted that the City Council requested that Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 and Lot 1 of Block 2 be single family dwellings rather than doubles. This has been shown Plannin~ and Zonin/~iseO Meeting October 14. 1980 -'Minutes Page 3 o o ,-=>on the plat. It was noted that the following variances will be required: 1) Lots 8 and 9 of Block 1 are more than twice the average size lot; 2) Lot 13. Block 1 has a lot depth less than the minimum requirement. It should be noted that lot depth cannot be increased; 3) All of the owner's contiguous property has not been platted (Ordinance 10, 8.01 (G)). The outstanding item would be favorable review from the County Highway Department. Commissioner Lobb questioned the vacation of the easement on the plat. Chairperson Bosell noted that according to the City Attorney, it can be vacated prior to final plat approval. Commissioner Scherer asked what happens to the remainder of Lot 5 that was not included in the park dedication. Chairperson Bosell stated that it would be added to Lot 6. Ms. Sonsteby explained that there is a petition going around Auditor's Subdivision 82 requesting that the Park Board take the lots on Round Lake rather then the lots in the plat for park dedication. Chairperson Bosell noted that if they did something that would substantially change the plat. it would have to come back to the Planning Commission. On two other occasions the City has taken park land outside of a plat. Commissioner Scherer asked what the distance is between the plat and the lots on the lake. Ms. Sonsteby stated that it's about 4 blocks. Commissioner Scherer explained that the concern that was expressed before was to have something for the children who will be liVing in the doubles. He doesn't think we should take the lots on the lake as park. Commissioner Lobb noted that this is going to be a densely populated area and the park should be within the plat. He doesn't feel the City should have to pay for park property (Ms. Sonsteby would be giving the city one lake lot and asking them to purchase the other lot). That would not be good planning for the city. He didn't think the Park Board should take as much land as they are recommending. He felt that one of the lots would be sufficient and that it should be a tot lot. Commissioner Anstett noted that the Park Board felt that taking only a small lot would be a waste of money. There was a lot of discussion at the Park Board meeting on whether this would remain a tot lot or if it would grow. Commissioner Scherer stated his reasons for not asking for the lake lots: if you're going to serve younger children, to have a 4 block distance is not realistic; the danger of the lake would also mean that youngsters cannot go to the park; it will be a source of trouble in the future as it will attract people who do not live in the neighborhood who want to use the access to the lake. He would rather have cash in lieu of land than this alternate site. Ms. Sonsteby stated that she talked to several people with small children and they would prefer to have swingsets in their own yards than to have them go to a park. The people in the area should have a say as to where they want the park. Commissioner Johnson stated that taking four plus lots for park land is exceptional. Two lots plus the balance in cash would make a good tot lot and that is what should be pursued. He felt that a park is definitely needed in this area. r'-Commissioner Kishel felt that the recommendation from the Park Board should be given some ~1eight, it should not be ignored. MOTION by Lobb. seconded by Johnson to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Anstett, seconded by Johnson that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Plannin~ and Zonin~~mmisE~ Meeting October 14, 1980 - M~nutes Page 4 () o , ~recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat of Rosella's Addition r , ',-/legally described as That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the south line of said SE~ of the SW~ distant 1040 feet westerly of the Southeast corner thereof; thence northerly, parallel with the east line of said SE~ of the SW~, a distance of 1000 feet; thence northeasterly to a point on the west line of the east 900 feet of said SE~ of the SW~, said point being distant 298 feet southerly of the north line of said SE~ of the SW~; thence northerly parallel with the east line of said SE~ of the SW~ a distance of 298 feet to the north line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest quarter and said line there terminating. Except the following parcels, all in Section 29, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota: Parcel 6680, Parcel 6600, Parcel 6650, Parcel 6700 and Parcel 7010., for the following reasons: 1) The City Engineer has reviewed the plat; 2) A public hearing was held; there was no opposition; 3) The Park Board has made a recommendation although the Commission expressed some concern about the amount of property necessary and the location of the property for the park; 4) the following variances will be required: a) Lot 13, Block 1 will require a variance because the lot depth is less than the required minimum. A hardship is created because MS. Sonsteby doesn't own the property to the south which would enable her to increase the lot depth; b) Lots 8 and 9 of Block 1 are more than twice the size of the average lot; c) all of the owner's contiguous property is not being platted. Again, a hardship is created because Ms. Sonsteby owns too much property to plat; 5) Approval of the plat is contingent upon the receipt of a letter from the County Highway Department indicating their approval and also contingent upon the vacation of an easement through Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2 and Lot 3 of Block 1; 6) This plat meets the basic intent and application of the ordinances of the City of Andover and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; 7) The plat would not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Andover. Commissioner Johnson noted that the park definitely should be located within this plat. The Park Board however should arrive at a compromise and not take so much land. Commissioner Lobb concurred with Commissioner Johnson. Vote on motion: Yes - Anstett, Scherer, Johnson, Bosell, Lobb; Present _ Kishel (voted present as he is an employee of the County Highway Department and feels he would have conflicting interest at the present time.) This will go to the City Council the first meeting in November. Andover Communit Center Prelimina Plat Continued Public Hearin Comm. 115-80-3 Chairperson Bosell reopened the public hearing. Ed Ames, Orr, Schelen, Mayeron, representing Wffi. C. Rademacher and Associates _ Noted that pursuant to the last meeting, the follOWing changes have been made on the plat: Setback lines have been shown; The type of surfacing and width of l39th Avenue N.W. and l38th Lane N.W. have been shown; County Road 116 has been shown as having bituminous surfacing and County Road 9 is shown as bituminous surfacing under construction; soil borings have been submitted to the City Engineer; the Park Board has recommended cash in lieu of land for park dedication; a location map and the number of linear miles of roads have been added to the plat; areas needing fill have been shown in a shaded manner. Chairperson Bosell asked if the revised plat had been resubmitted to the County Highway ,--ryepartment. Mr. Ames stated that it has been submitted but they have received no answer as ,-Jet. He noted that the drainage and utility easements have been changed to 15 feet. The following items were noted as requiring variances: Lot 1, Block 5 is less than the required five acres; Lot 1, Block 1 is less than the required 2 acres for a Neighborhood Business site. Also noted was that the ordinance states no lots can front on County Roads. Therefore, Lot 1, Block 5 will have to front on Quay Street rather than County Road 116. Planning and zonin( ~mmiss~ Meeting October 14, 1980 - M~nutes Page 5 u o ~ ,Joe Caskinette, 13852 Round Lake Boulevard - Was concerned about cleanliness. Stated that ~he has enough papers blowing into his yard from County Road 9 and doesn't want more. MOTION by Anstett, Seconded by Kishel to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Anstett that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat known as the Andover Community Shopping Center, legally described as: The West 330 feet of the NWt of the NEt of Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota; The west 330 feet of the swt of the NEt of Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota; The east 195 feet of the West 525 feet of the South 835 feet of the swt of the NEt of Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka, County, Minnesota; The south 408 feet of the swt of the NEt lying east of the west 525 feet thereof, Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to the rights of the public in and to County State Aid Highway No. 9 and County State Aid Highway No. 16., for the following reasons: 1) The plat has been reviewed by the City Engineer and meets with his approval; 2) A public hearing was held; there was considerable public input with no negative comments; 3) The plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; 4) The Park Board has recommended cash in lieu of land, in the amount of $35,837.50; 5) The plat would not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Andover; 6) Approval of the plat is contingent upon receipt of a letter from the Anoka County Highway Department indicating their approval; 7) The following variances would be required: a) Lot 1, Block 1 is less than the required 2 acres for Neighborhood Business. This variance should be granted as this is part of a large project and it would be good planning as it will be consistent with the rest of the development; b) Lot 1, Block 5 is less than the required 5 acres for Shopping Center; c) Lot 1, Block 5 is less than 200 feet wide. This would not be allowed to front on a County State Aid Highway. Motion carried unanimously. This will go to the City Council the first week in November. Wm. C. Rademacher Special Use Permit Public Hearing (Comm. #9-80-1) Chairperson Bosell opened the Public Hearing. She noted that the purpose of this Special Use Permit is to install self-service gasoline pumps and for bulk storage of gasoline. Larry Winner, City Engineer stated that he has reviewed this application and his only concern on the site plan is the driveway off of l40th Lane. The entrance is shown as 90 feet, which is not sound traffic engineering. He suggested that an island be installed so there would be two separate driveway approaches 30 feet in width. Chairperson Bosell asked if the storage tanks will be put in while the store is being built. Wayne Anderson. WID. C. Rademacher and Associates stated they would be. Chairperson Bosell questioned whether the number of parking spaces shown is adequate. David Almgren. City Building Official stated that it exceeds the ordinance requirements. Wayne Anderson - noted that they will be putting in an island for the driveway. MOTION by Kishel, seconded by Scherer to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Scherer, seconded by Kishel that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of a Special Use Permit for WID. C. Rademacher to construct a ,--bulk storage facility and self-service gas pumps at Bill's Superette, known as Lot 1, Block ~2, Andover Community Shopping Center, for the following reasons: 1) A public hearing was held. No opposition was voiced on the part of the people in attendance; 2) The City Engineer has reviewed the request and finds it satisfactory; 3) The Building Inspector has indicated the plan shows adequate parking space; 4) The request complies with Ordinance 8, Sections Plannin~ and Zonin~isf~~ Meeting October 14, 1980 - M~nutes Page 6 f \ ~ o / -4.26 and 7.03; 5) The request is not detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the ~,lesidents of the City of Andover; 6) The Special Use Permit is subject to the provision that the access to the parking lot be constructed in such a way to narrow the driveway to a maximum of 30 feet; 7) The Special Use Permit is contingent upon construction of a retail store consisting of a minimum of 2,000 square feet. Motion carried unanimously. This will go to the City Council the first week in November. (Recess 9:13 - Reconvene 9:27) North Suburban Praise Fellowship Church Special Use Permit Public Hearing (Comm. #9-80-2) Chairperson Bosell opened the public hearing. George Ridge, 3402 - 12th Avenue, Anoka - Stated that they are planning to buy the property located at 14947 - 7th Avenue and begin building a church in the spring. They are checking with the Fire Marshall about using the house on the property during the winter, but have not received his report as yet. If they can't use the house as a church, they will rent it out over the winter. Chairperson Bosell noted that the property is zoned R-l and is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. The lot area for non-residential use is 5 acres; however, the ordinance allows for a church in a residential district by Special Use Permit. Jerry Lapham, 14913 - 7th Avenue - Stated that he is opposed to a Special Use Permit in his area regardless of who might be applying for it. If this Permit is granted, it will set a precedent. Wants his area to remain residential. The traffic situation will be very difficult because there is a hill to the north of that property and it will be hard to see cars coming south. Asked why this group is trying to locate in this area when they were going to buy a church building in Anoka. George Ridge - noted that they were unable to obtain the property in Anoka because of financing. Mrs. Ralph Stephens, 15032 - 7th Avenue - has the same objections as Mr. Lapham and is very concerned about the traffic. Allan Miles, 14760 - 7th Avenue - is opposed to the issuance of this Special Use Permit. Felt that the land size should be looked at for future expansion. Was also concerned about the water flow as this property slopes toward Mr. Lapham's property. Chairperson Bosell noted that they have to contain their storm water, it cannot flow onto Mr. Lapham's property. Mrs. Lyle Bradley, 15202 - 7th Avenue - questioned if this permit would be for only one year and if they have to indicate when they will be building. Chairperson Bosell explained that it can be a conditional use permit with restrictions and time limits. Jerry Lapham the tax rolls. - asked if the Special Use Permit is issued does the property get removed from (Yes). Dwight Denyes, 2056 - lllth Lane, Real Estate Agent - stated that he is the listing agent on this property. Once the property is purchased by the church it will be taken off the tax /,rolls. This would mean a loss of revenue to the city of $500.00 a year. The church he ~~ttends in Fridley is on less than three acres and has a seating capacity of 800 and has plenty of parking space. As far as a church near a residential area, that's probably where churches should be. Doesn't think that an entrance onto 7th Avenue would present any problem. Plannin~ and zonin(-~iss~ Meeting October 14, 1980 - Minutes Page 7 o o /-,Paul Cavner, Adams Associates - stated that one of the reasons he brought this property to ~,the church's attention was the fact that it is on a main thoroughfare. For that reason, he felt it would be a good site for a church. Commissioner 100 to 150. Kishel noted Lobb asked what the seating capacity will be. George Ridge stated it will be Commissioner Lobb then asked what the size of the property is. Commissioner that it is 2.3 acres. Dwight Denyes stated that according to the County Surveyor the property is 2.8 acres. Mr. Lapham noted that originally it was a 3 acre site. MOTION by Scherer, seconded by Lobb to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Scherer stated that he would like to see a time limit placed on the Special Use Permit. Also noted that according to the Supreme Court you cannot use loss of tax revenue as a reason for denial. David Almgren, Building Inspector - noted that on the half section map, it comes out to 2.2 acres with the right-of-way taken out. Mrs. Bradley - asked if a church can buy a property like this, have it taken off the tax rolls and then rent it out for a profit. Chairperson Bosell stated that churches do this all the time. Commissioner Kishel - has a problem with the size of the lot. Does not feel that it has enough area to build a church on and still leave the house there. Bob Peach, 15830 University Avenue Ext. - stated that if there is less than 2.5 acres, a building permit could not be issued. Chairperson Bosell noted that the property to the east is not developed and perhaps the church could buy part of that and add it to this property to make the 2.5 acres. Allan Miles - suggested that this item be tabled until they find out exactly how much property there actually is. Paul Cavner- stated that the owner of the property has to move soon and wants to sell this property. The church would like to have a decision tonight. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Lobb to table this item until the Planning Commission's next meeting. Motion carried on a 4 yes - 2 no (Bosell, Scherer) vote. This will be continued to the next meeting. At this time, a special meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, October 21, 1980 to deal with the above item and also the Dog Bite Ordinance, Ordinance 8, Sections 7.01 and 3.02, the Multiple Conversion Ordinance and the Rum River Scenic River Ordinance. Kim Sai Sia House Moving Permit (Comm. #10-80-2) Kim Sai Sia, 11518 Zea Street, Coon Rapids - stated that the house he wants to move to .,'~dover has to be moved before October 16, 1980. A lot of improvements will be made to the ~~ouse. Chairperson Bosell asked the BUilding Inspector if he has had any problems with other houses that have been moved into the city. David Almgren. Building Inspector stated that they never seem to get completed. Plannin~ and zonin( ~iSS~ Meeting October 14, 1980 - Minutes Page 8 u o ,"-,David Almgren noted that the site where Mr. Sia plans to move the house is in an R-2 zone ~and the minimum ground coverage would be 1200 square feet. Chairperson Bosell noted that Ordinance 10C says that we don't have any more R-2 zones. Barb Dehn, 17245 Navaio Street N.W. - stated that they were going to build a 964 square foot home and were told they had to have 1200 square feet. All of the homes in that area had to be at least 1200 square feet. Mr. Almgren - told Mr. Sia that he would have to have soil borings taken and also a perc test. Mr. Sia stated that if he has to have 1200 square feet, he will build the house so that it does have 1200 square feet. He asked how he will find out exactly how many square feet he needs. Commissioner Kishel stated that the Building Inspector will let him know. MOTION by Kishel, seconded by Anstett that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the application by Kim Sai Sia for a permit to relocate a l~ story stucco residence onto the property legally described as The South 330 feet as measured along the West line thereof, of the following described tract: That plrt of the NWt of the NWt of Section 7, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said NWt of the NWt said point being a distance of 463.46 feet West of the Northeast corner of said NWt of the NWt; thence South o degrees, 26 minutes East (assumed bearing of the North line of said NWt of the NWt is West) to the south line of said NWt of the NWt; thence Westerly on said South line to the Southwest corner of said NWt of the NWt; thence Northerly on the West line of said NWt of the NWt to the NW corner of said NWt of the NWt; thence East on the North line of said NWt of the NWt to the point of beginning. Subject to an easement for road purposes over the west 33 feet thereof. Also subject to an easement of record to Northern States Power Company., being a 10 acre tract of land located one mile south of the Rum River on 7th Avenue in the City of Andover, for the following reasons: 1) The applicant has submitted proposed draWings of the structure and additions which he proposes to complete in a timely fashion and is prepared to meet all of the ordinances and requirements of the City of Andover; 2) The proposed structure is consistent with the area and will not detract from the health, safety and welfare of the general public. Motion carried unanimously. This will go to the City Council the first week in November. Discussion: Commissioner Johnson asked what guarantee we have that the structure will end up looking like the plans. Chairperson Bosell stated that Mr. Sia has to submit these plans to the Building Inspector and he has to meet the codes for new construction. Multiple Conversion Ordinance (Comm. #8-80-12) David Almgren, City Building Inspector, showed plans for new construction for a party wall. The conversion of an old unit will have to have a two wall system and a surveyor will have to establish a zero lot line. Also, the square footage of the lot will have to comply with the ordinance requirements. They have to have a l~ hour fire wall. This will be continued to the special meeting, October 21, 1980. Ordinance 8 (Comm. #8-80-10) ~'David Almgren - noted that the way the ordinance reads regarding floor area, duplex units are ~not addressed. He recommended what the City Clerk had suggested. This will be continued to the special meeting, October 21, 1980. MOTION by Lobb, seconded by Johnson to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting Planning and zonini--)nrnniss/-i Meeting October 14, 1980 ~Minutes~ Page 9 () ",adjourned at 11:05 P.M. " J - Respectfully submitted, u& Vicki Vo1k, Recording Clerk " , , . , \. ) o o C C~' J ~J ~ 01 ANDOVER o (~ o PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 14, 1980 AMENDMENT TO MINUTES Rosella's Addition Preliminary Plat (Corom. #6-80-5) Chairperson Bosell noted at the last City Council meeting the Mayor expressed concern over having a road going to the west from this plat. She noted that on the future subdivision plan, Woodbine Street is shown as being extended. There is also a ditch to the west and it would be a little hard to put a road across the ditch. Commissioner Lobb felt that the plat should be left the way it is. Respectfully submitted, u'u Vicki Volk, Clerk t) '-