Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 23, 1988 :J ~) ~ u u CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.w. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1988 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Variance (Lazarz), cont. 4. Variance (Correll) 5. Rademacher Special Use Permit Public Hearing Outlot A Kensington Estates 3rd Addition 6. Rademacher Special Use Permit Public Hearing Lot 1 Block 6 Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd Addition 7. Bill's Superette Special Use Permit 8. Family of Christ Amended Special Use Permit 9. Variance (Olmstead) 10. Tonson, Inc. Special Use Permit Revocation 11. Ordinance 8 Amendments, cont. 12. Variance (Anoka County Highway Department) 13. Adjournment o () , '1 '-J ~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.w. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 23, 1988 The regularly scheduled Andover Planning and Zoning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairman Marjorie Perry at 7:27 p.m., Tuesday, August 23, 1988, in the Council Chambers of Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W., Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present included Chairman Marjorie Perry, Rebecca Pease, Wayne Vistad, d'Arcy Bosell, and Bill Bernard. Also present was Assistant City Engineer, Todd Haas, and the City Building Inspector. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was agreed by all the commissioners to move this agenda item to the end of list of agenda items for this regular Planning meeting. VARIANCE (LAZARZ). CONT. Todd Haas stated that the Planning Commission was requested to review the variance request from Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 front yard setback as requested by Mr. Lazarz. Mr. Lazarz wanted to build an attached garage on his home which was built in the 1950's before the ordinance went into effect. Todd Haas stated that he and the City Building Official did an on-site inspection of the property. Based on the inspection, it was determined that the garage could be built so it would be in compliance with the existing ordinance -- as the existing grade is relatively level and it does not appear it would take much effort to grade the site. There was some discussion regarding Ordinance 8, Section 4.03 in regard to non-conforming use and structures. To attach a garage onto a non-conforming structure would be in violation of Section 4.03. "i , -/ '__oj ~ ! Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Two Motion was made by Commissioner Bosell that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the variance request of Mike Lazarz, of 3747-157th Avenue NH, to add onto an existing lawful non-conforming use an attached garage. It has been determined that with the attachment of this garage to this existing lawfully non-conforming use it would violate Ordinance 8, Section 4.15 setbacks along thoroughfares and county roads. It would also not be in conformance with Ordinance 8, Section 4.03 non-conforming uses and structures wherein it specifically states that no structural alteration shall be made and there shall be no intensification of a non-conforming use. It should be further noted that the City Building Official, the Assistant City Engineer inspected the property and determined that a detached garage could be placed on the property to meet the setback requirements and still protect the integrity of the septic system that is in place. The Chairman asked three times for a second and received none. Therefore, the Motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Bosell reintroduced her motion. not seconded by anyone. Again, it was Commissioner Bernard asked for more information from Mr. Haas. Mr. Haas stated that he was requested to do an on-site inspection because of a hardship might have been created because of the topography of the land. After doing the inspection, he and the building official only found that the land gently sloped and could be graded easily. Chairman Perry stated that the situation on this item Has that the property owner was making a request that was in conflict with the ordinances as they are written. She also stated that the Planning Commission does not have the flexibility of making a recommendation based on what the commissioners would like to see happen. Ms. Perry suggested that the commissioners make a recommendation based on the ordinance requirements and it Hould be up to the City Council to find any extenuating circumstances, the Council could then change the recommendation made by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Bosell reintroduced her motion, seconded by Hayne Vistad. Chairman Perry polled the commission. I ~/ \ ~ Andover Planning and Zoning August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Three Commission , , Wayne Vistad voted yes and stated he realized it was a non- conforming structure but that it was putting undue hardship on the owner because he didn't feel it would infringe anymore on the road and in the setbacks than the existing structure. Commissioner Pease voted yes because it's in accordance with the ordinances, but her personal feeling was that the garage was not the important structure, Commissioner Bernard voted no. Commissioner Bosell voted yes. Commissioner Perry voted yes, although she would like to suggest a work session be scheduled because the ordinance regarding non-conforming use appears to be more stringent than necessary. Also the request seems to be a very logical one. This item will go to the City Council September 6th. VARIANCE (CORRELL) Todd Haas explained the variance request by Mr. Correll to build a 12' x 12' deck onto their existing home. The variance is required as it would violate the side yard setback by 10 feet. Chairman Perry asked if the proposed deck was to extend beyond and into the setback area. Todd confirmed that it was and explained that the deck could not be moved anywhere along the north side because it would still encroach into the setback area. Ken Correll, 13791 Crane Street, stated the home was a four- level home and in the dining room, there were patio doors that would walk out to a deck. He also explained that in the original plans included a deck to be put on in this area. Their plan showed that the house should have been moved over 10-12 feet to allow for the deck. Apparently, the final plan submitted to the City did not show this. They found out at the closing, that they needed a variance to build a deck. Mr. Vistad stated there was a similar situation on 142nd wherein a property owner's home was built only 10 feet from the lot line. In this situation, the owner went ahead and built a deck anyway, although he was instructed to only build a patio, and did have to take down his deck and put it on the ground as a detached structure with steps down to it. Mr. Vistad thought that the property owner could get use of his property by building a patio and still be in compliance with the ordinance. ~- / u Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Page Four Commissioner Bernard asked for the recommendation from the Building Official. Mr. Almgren stated that if the Planning Commission did choose to vary from the ordinance he did think there would be enough room on the lot, and it doesn't appear this would cause any traffic hazards from the site angles. A motion was made by Commissioner Vistad that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the variance request submitted by Ken Corell for the property at 13791 Crane Street, Lot 3, Block 3, Hills of Bunker Lake. The request to add a 12' by 12' deck to the north side of the house would be in violation of the sideyard setback by 10 feet of Ordinance 8, Section 6.02. It is not necessary to grant this variance because the owners could have reasonable use of the land by putting a patio in the area. Chairman Perry asked for someone to second the motion. The motion died for lack of a second. A motion was made by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner Bernard that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the variance request submitted by the Corells for the property at 13791 Crane Street, Lot 3, Block 3, Hills of Bunker Lake pursuant to Ordinance 8, Section 5.04, Subsection 4, in that a hardship has been created by the builder, Norwood Homes, in that the plans the property owners signed off at time of the closing, and the plans that the builder submitted for review by the building department were different and that it was not until the time of closing that these plans in fact were not the same. Though the variance does not deal with the reasonableness or lack thereof of the use of that property, the design of the home was such that the deck was to be an integral part of that and it is further noted that the developer, Jerry Green, has gone on record saying that the encroachment into the sideyard setback by 10 feet still allows for 25 feet of setback area, would not violate the integrity of the surrounding properties and would not violate any of the development covenants in place with this property. There was discussion on the Motion. Wayne Vistad questioned the "hardship" statement in the motion and thought that the motion was in violation of Section 5.04. Commissioner Bosell stated that the property owners did not create the hardship, but instead the hardship was created by the builder. Commissioner Perry polled the Commission: Commissioner Vistad voted no, Commissioners Pease, Bosell, Bernard, and Perry all voted yes. Motion was carried. \ ~~ u \ , , Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Five This item will go to the City Council on September 6, 1988. RADEMACHER SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING OUTLOT A KENSINGTON ESTATES 3RD ADDITION Todd Haas stated that a special use permit (required by Ordinance Section 8, 7.03 and Section 4.26) was being requested by William Rademacher for the installation of gas tanks, motor fuel and propane tanks on the property known as Outlot A of Kensington Estates 3rd Addition. Commissioner Bosell stated that a special use permit was required to Ordinance 8, Section 7.03 in which it states that 2,000 square feet of retail space must be acquired before a service station could be installed. Also the site plan identifies the proposed structure as a shopping center; it should be renamed as a neighborhood business center. Chairman Perry opened the public hearing. Wayne Anderson, of Rademacher and Associates, stated that there would be development of the neighborhood business center next year. Commissioner Vistad looked at the requirements of Ordinance 8, Section 8.08, Subsection E stating that there should be one space per 150 feet of floor area. He saw on the Rademacher plans that there would be 138 stalls, but 163 would be needed. Mr. Anderson stated they would be in compliance with the City ordinances on this item. Mr. Anderson did not locate the propane sites because he was going to work with the City and fire marshall in determining the safest locations. Ms. Bosell asked if the site was 4 acres 1n size. Mr. Anderson indicated it was +/- 4 acres. There was some discussion on the requirements of the site plan as a commercial site plan application would include more detail -- grading plans, legal description, landscape plans, etc. There was discussion by the Commissioners that these would be requirements prior to development of the site, but would not be needed at this time. Motion was made by Commissioner, seconded by Commissioner to close the public hearing. All voted yes. Motion carried. ,) 0 Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Six ) Motion was made by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner Pease that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit request of William C. Rademacher from the property described as Outlot A, of Block 8, Kensington Estates (Kensington Plaza) for the installation of gas tanks, motor fuel and propane tanks. Pursuant to Ordinance 8, Section 7.03 and 4.26, this request is allowed in a neighborhood business district. In specific reference to a service station, the requirement is that 2,000 square feet of retail space be constructed prior to the time that the service pumps are installed and it is the intent of the developer to meet that requirement. A public hearing was held and there was no opposition to the request before the Planning Commission. The site will be reviewed by the Andover Review Committee at the time the development will begin as it pertains to such items as parking requirements, setbacks, green space, etc. In specific reference to the propane tanks, the maker of the motion would like to incorporate the same language as was applied to 14041 Round Lake Boulevard as it pertains to Bill's Superette and the addition of a propane tank on that property. Roll call: Commissioners Bernard, Pease, Perry, Bosell, and Vistad all voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. This item will go to the City Council on September 6, 1988. RADEMACHER SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING. LOT 1. BLOCK 6. HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE. 3RD ADDITION The site is 4.2 acres. This is also a request by Mr. Rademacher for a special use permit for the installation of gas tanks, motor fuel and propane tanks on the property known as Lot 1, Block 6 of Hills of Bunker Lake, 3rd Addition. Chairman Perry opened the public hearing. Mr. Wayne Anderson commented that construction on this project would be next year. Marion Heidelberger asked for the exact location of the property. A motion was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Bosell to close the public hearing. Commissioner Vistad requested that Mr. Anderson review the allotted number of parking stalls and square foot requirements. \....../ \ ,,--) \ I Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Seven Motion was made by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner Pease that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit request of William C. Rademacher from the property described as Lot 1, Block 6 of Hills of Bunker Lake, 3rd Addition for the installation of gas tanks, motor fuel and propane tanks. Pursuant to Ordinance 8, Section 7.03 and 4.26, this request is allowed in a neighborhood business district. In specific reference to a service station, the requirement is that 2,000 square feet of retail space be constructed prior to the time that the service pumps are installed and it is the intent of the developer to meet that requirement. A public hearing was held and there was no opposition to the request before the Planning Commission. The site will be reviewed by the Andover Review Committee at the time the development will begin as it pertains to such items as parking requirements, setbacks, green space, etc. In specific reference to the propane tanks, the maker of the motion would like to incorporate the same language as was applied to 14041 Round Lake Boulevard as it pertains to Bill's Superette and the addition of a propane tank on that property. Roll call: unanimously. All Commissioners voted yes. Motion carried This item will go to the City Council on September 6, 1988. BILL'S SUPERETTE SPECIAL USE PERMIT Todd Haas explained that a special use permit was requested by Bill's Superette to allow the outdoor sales during operating hours. Commissioner Bosell requested that all the property for the hot dog sale be contained within that property, and that no parking be allowed on 140th or Round Lake Boulevard because that intersection could be a traffic hazard. Also she suggested that the hours of operation be included, with the dates for the sales to be held too. Chairman Perry opened the public hearing. Motion was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Pease to close the public hearing. '\ ,j o Andover Planning and Zoning August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Eight Commission J Motion was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Bosell that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the special use permit requested by Bill's Superette, at 14041 Round Lake Boulevard, Andover, Minnesota, to allow for outdoor sales during operating hours as required by Ordinance 8, Section 7.03. There was a public hearing held and there was no opposition. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. As a condition, a special use permit is suggested that the owner post no parking, if permitted by the County, on County Road Round Lake Boulevard and 140th during the sale. Also, the hours of the outdoor sale (8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.) should be noted. The dates of the sales would be approximately mid-May and Mid-September, and would last for a three-day period, contingent on weather conditions. Roll Call: Commissioners Perry, Pease, Vistad, Bosell, and Bernard all voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. FAMILY OF CHRIST SPECIAL USE PERMIT Todd Haas explained that the Family of Christ Lutheran Church was requesting a special use permit to allow an additional space for Sunday School. Chairman Perry opened the public hearing. Ted Larson, Chairman of the Building Committee, spoke about the amount of growth at the church, especially in families with children. The facilities of the church are very limited and they wanted to put an addition (separate building) that would house five classrooms. The size would be about 56 feet long. Commissioner Bosell had a question in regard to the parking because there is to be one space for each three seats or each five feet of pew line. She thought that with the addition of classroom space, they would probably need to increase the space for parking also. Ms. Bosell had a concern that the Church is on two County Roads and that the City did not want overflow parking to occur on either of those County Roads. She recommended reducing the size of the parking stalls from 10 x 20 to 10 x 18. A motion was made by Commissioner Pease, seconded by Commissioner Vistad to close the public hearing. ~ J o \ Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Nine J A motion was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Bernard that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the amended Special Use Permit requested by the Family of Christ Lutheran Church in a residential district at 160,15 Nightingale Street NW to conform to Ordinance 8, Section 7.03; it is recommended that the parking spaces are to comply with Section 8.08 on the existing and the proposed new addition. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community and it is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinances and the comprehensive plan. A public hearing was held and there was no opposition. All the commissioners voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. This item will go to the City Council on September 6, 1988. VARIANCE (OLMSTEAD) This item is a variance request from Ordinance 10, Section to allow an on-site septic system which does not meet the minimum requirements of 39,000 square feet of land area which is to be buildable. The building official recommends approval of the request. Jeff Johnson, spoke on behalf of Scott Olmstead. A question was raised why an updated drawing was not submitted to include the front, side and rear yard building setbacks. Also the drawing should have included the existing structures within 100 feet of the property. Dave Almgren stated that this lot is high buildable land but doesn't meet the requirements of 39,000 square feet. A motion was made by Commissioner Bernard, seconded by Commissioner Vistad, that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the variance request by Scott Olmstead, for the property at 159 Xenia Street NW, Andover, with the legal description Lot 23, Block 3 for the following reasons: The variance request from Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 a(3) to allow an on-site septic system which does not meet the minimum requirement of 39,000 square feet of the land area which is to be buildable. The square footage of the entire lot is 37,108 square feet. The Building Official has reviewed the variance request but requires the following information before approval is given: front, side and rear yard building setbacks and (2) the existing structures within 100 feet of the property. It would be a " ~ , ) '....... \ J Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Ten necessary and reasonable use of the land and it would be in conformance with the comprehensive plan. It will not adversely affect the existing or potential use of adjacent land. All voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. RECESS The Planning Commission recessed at 9:20 p.m. and reconvened at 9:27 p.m. TONSON, INC. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVOCATION Todd Haas stated that the Special Use Permit granted to Schriptek, Inc. and continued to Tonson, Inc. (Waste Recycling, Inc.), the following matters are not in compliance with either the Solid Waste Ordinance for Anoka County or the Stipulation Agreement with the Waste Management Board and, therefore, constitutes a violation of the Special Use Permit. (1) The County advised Tonson, Inc. in a letter dated August 11, 1988, that it would not renew its license because they do not have the necessary equipment for the conduct of the operation. (2) Said license precludes Tonson, Inc. from receiving any new waste tires, and therefore, licensee has been put on notice by the County that the receipt of any new waste tires would be a violation of the Solid Waste Ordinance. (3) Pursuant to the Stipulation Agreement in place with the Waste Management Board, new waste tires were to be placed in the Receiving/Processing Area only. Tonson, Inc. was observed on July 29, 1988, unloading new waste tires into Area 2 with the actual unloading of tires from a semi-trailer. They were also observed unloading a dump truck into Area 2. It was further noted that a dump truck was being refilled at the Receiving/Processing Area and then proceeded to Area 2 to be dumped. (4) Tonson, Inc. is responsible for the removal of any oversized tires to an approved processing site if they are unable to process tires at their site. .' ~j u \ I Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Eleven Commissioner Bosell, in her capacity as Zoning Administrator, is not voting on this matter. She stated that Ed Walsh and Andy Ronchak of the Waste Management Board are present to address any concerns. Chairman Perry opened the public hearing. Mrs. Heidelberger passed out a list of judgments that have been filed against Mr. LaPanta to the Commissioners. She doesn't understand how he can purchase new equipment if he owes $368,000 in judgments. She had recent pictures of new tires that were being moved onto the site. She would like to see the special permit license revoked and have someone else come in and start removing some of the tires to get the area cleaned up. Mr. Ed Walsh, of the Waste Management Board, is interested getting all the dumps around the state cleaned up. It is his responsibility tonight to go on a fact-finding mission to see what the position the City is taking in regard to the site in Andover, as well as the intentions of the County. In the event the City or County acts to revoke or not to reissue license or permits, which would result in the Tonson's inability to operate on that site, the State would certainly be interested in working with whomever has access or ownership or control of the tires on that site. Once the State had knowledge of ownership of the tires on that site, the State could enter into an agreement to make sure the tires get processed and cleaned up as expeditiously as possible. There are three other processing facilities in the State -- one in Mora, one in Babbitt, and a private corporation in Preston, Minnesota. Richard Cordy, with the Babbitt processing facility stated that his role here tonight is strictly as an observer. His company has submitted a proposal to the State of Minnesota to assist in cleaning up the stockpiles that exist within the State. Mr. Cecil Heidelberger stated that Mr. LaPanta leases said property from him. When Mr. LaPanta leased the property from Mr. lIeidelberger, he was disallowed to take tires off of the secondary part of the property. Now he's piling tires on the secondary part which is against the lease. Mr. Heildelberger wants to get the tires cleaned up--the PCA won't come in and finish their studies until the tires are taken off; the City wants to buy the property to add to their industrial park. lie feels Mr. Panta is dragging his feet and not getting rid of the tires. Mr. Heidelberger spoke with Mr. Cordy of the Babbitt processing facility and they could get the tires removed in 6 months. ',~ 0 .I Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Twelve Marion Heidelberger, lives right next to the area with the tires. She wondered who would be paying for cleaning up the tires. Chairman Perry said that the once the State determined the ownership of the tires, it would not be known who would pay for the tires. Mr. LaPanta, President of Tonson Corporation, started in April 1985 with the Stipulation Agreement. He had approximately 1.2 million tires on the site. There are approximately 200,000 tires left on the site. A fire burned up some of the processing equipment. The equipment is now in repair and some new equipment is being ordered and should be received in September. Tonson Corporation intends to do the job as cited in the Stipulation Agreement. He is prepared to litigate this matter with the City and/or County should his permit be revoked. A motion was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Pease to close the public hearing. All voted yes. Motion carried. A motion was made by Commissioner Vistad that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council revocation of the Special Use Permit R85-83 granted to Schriptek, Inc. and continued to Tonson, Inc. (Waste Recycling, Inc.), that items #1, 3, 4 as listed in the agenda outline are not in compliance with either the Solid Waste Ordinance for Anoka County or the Stipulation Agreement with the Waste Management and, therefore, constitute a violation of the Special Use Permit. Chairman Perry asked for a second on the motion. died for lack of a second. The motion Commissioner Vistad reentered his motion, but there was no second to the motion. Commissioner Pease asked if the license from Anoka County has been denied. Commissioner Bosell stated that Anoka County will not renew the license. A new motion was reintroduced by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Bernard that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council revocation of the Special Use Permit R85-83 granted to Schriptek, Inc. and continued to Tonson, Inc. (Waste Recycling, Inc.), that items #1 and 3 as listed in the agenda outline are not in compliance with either the Solid Waste Ordinance for Anoka County or the , ~~ ~) Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Minutes Page Thirteen Stipulation Agreement with the Waste Management and, therefore, constitute a violation of the Special Use Permit. Roll call: Commissioners Vistad, Bernard, Pease, Perry all voted yes. Motion carried. This item will go to the Council September 6, 1988. ORDINANCE 8 AMENDMENTS, CONT. Todd Haas requested that the Planning Commission table this item until the next regularly scheduled meeting to allow him more time to review this amendment. A motion was made by Commissioner Vistad to table this item until the next regular Planning Meeting. All voted yes. Motion carried. VARIANCE (ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT) Todd Haas stated that Anoka County has applied for a variance request from Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 in an R-1 single family residential district to allow a storage shed for salt to exceed the maximum height of 35 feet. The location is just east of Hanson Boulevard/Bunker Lake Boulevard. Paul Ruud of Anoka County was present and discussed the intent of the building was to store the salt in the winter and get the mixture of salt/sand inside during the summer. The height of the building was determined to facilitate the dumping of salt brought in by semi-trailers, that are hydraulic end-dump trailers. The building is shielded by the trees and is on the opposite side of where new homes are going on Bunker Lake Road. Commissioner Vistad asked if the transportation of the salt could be handled with an auger system and have a lower building. Mr. Ruud stated that is a possibility but one needs to look at the extra costs of handling, the time and cost it takes and the maintenance of the equipment that handles salt. \. J ,~ / Andover Planning and Zoning Commission August 23, 1988 Meeting Page Fourteen Motion was made by Commissioner Pease, seconded by Commissioner Bernard that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council to grant the variance pursuant to Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 in an R-l single family residential district to allow a structure to exceed the maximum height of 35 feet. The proposed structure height of the salt storage shed shall not exceed 48' 1/2" and will be located at 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard. It's in accordance with the public safety. It's a quasi-public building and, therefore, adequate reason to grant the variance. Roll Call: Ms. Bosell - Yes, Ms. Pease - Yes, Mr. Vistad - No, Ms. Perry - Yes, Mr. Bernard - Yes. Motion carried. This item will go to the City Council on September 6th. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Bernard to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at 11:10 p.m. All voted yes. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, . ,( n,:,,:&us:::/M~ (Plan.8) /