Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC - October 6, 2009 C I T Y O F L661 j§!!l 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US Regular City Council Meeting — Tuesday, October 6, 2009 Call to Order — 7:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance Resident Forum Agenda Approval 1. Approval of Minutes (9/15/09 Regular, 9/22/09 Workshop, 9/22/09 Closed) Consent Items 2. Approve Payment of Claims — Finance 3. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing/09- 2/2009 Street Reconstruction — Engineering 4. Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing/08- 37/157` Avenue NW Reconstruction (MSAS 102) - Engineering 5. Accept CCWD Demonstration Grant/09- 3I/Meadows Creek Estates Rain Garden Project — Engineering 6. Consider Approval Application for Exempt Pen Lions Club — Administration 7. Approve Recycling Agreement with Anoka County and the City of Andover Administration 8. Consider Approval On -Sale Liquor License /Andover Lanes — Administration 9. Consider Approval Application for Exempt Permit/The Way of the Shepherd — Administration 10. Approve Resolution - Call for Public Hearing on the Proposed Adoption of a Modification to the Development District No. 1 and the Proposed Adoption of the Modifications to the TIF Plans for TIF District Nos. 1 -1 & 1 -2 Redevelopment Districts— Administration Discussion Items 11. Presentation/ Two Rivers Community Land Trust/ Housing Rehabilitation in Andover — Planning 12. Public Hearing/ Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement/ 15956 Eagle Street NW — Planning 13. Consider Conditional Use Pennit/Telecommunications Antenna/Prairie Knoll Park - Planning. 14. Consider Code Amendment/Add Animal Therapy Facility as Conditional Use — Planning Staff Items 15. Declare Costs, Order Assessment Roll & Schedule Public Hearing for 2009 Delinquent Utility Fees & Fines - Administration 16. Administrator's Report -Administration Mayor /Council Input Closed Session — Land Purchase Negotiations - PIDs 07- 32 -24 -12 -0001 & 29- 32 -24 -44 -0022 Adjournment C T Y O F 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING —OCTOBER 6, 2009 MINUTES The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Mike Gamache, October 6, 2009, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Councilmembers present: Sheri Bukkila, Don Jacobson, Mike Knight, Julie Trude Councilmember absent: None Also present: City Attorney, Scott Baumgartner Director of Public Works /City Engineer, Dave Berkowitz City Administrator, Jim Dickinson Community Development Director, Will Neumeister Others PLEDGE 0FALLEG1ANCE RESIDENT FORUM No one wished to address the Council. AGENDA APPROVAL Councilmember Jacobson asked if they could move item 15 up to consent agenda. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to approve the Agenda as amended above. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OFMINUTES September 15, 2009, Regular Meeting: Correct as amended. Councilmember Trude stated on page one line 36 before the word alarm she would like "fire" to be ® added. Page nine, line 12 before the word "were" the sentence should read: "whether we were financing..." On line 27 after the word ten the word "years" should be added and after the words "twenty percent" the word "assessment" should be added. Councilmember Jacobson stated on page one, line 48 the sentence should read "... indicate both him © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 2 he..." Page five, line 29 at the beginning he would like the word "not" inserted before "be overly broad". Motion by Trude, Seconded by Bukkila, to approve the minutes as indicated above. Motion carried unanimously. September 22, 2009, Workshop Meeting: Correct as amended. Councilmember Trude asked they strike the words on lines 29 — 31 because this was not officially part of the tour and not a progress report. Page four, line 33; the first word should be "both" Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to approve the minutes as indicated above. Motion carried unanimously. September 22, 2009, Closed Session Meeting: Correct as amended. Councilmember Trude asked if staff looked at the number on the first page, line 45 because that number did not seem right to her. Mr. Dickinson stated the first part of it should be 836 and will be Q corrected. Councilmember Trude stated on line three before the word "the" she wanted to add the words "to justify ". Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Trude, to approve the minutes as indicated above. Motion carried unanimously. CONSENT ITEMS Item 2 Approval of Claims Item 3 Receive Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing /09- 2/2009 Street Reconstruction (See Resolution R072 -09) Item 4 Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing /08- 37/157` Avenue NW Reconstruction (MSAS 102) (See Resolution R073 -09) Item 5 Accept CCWD Demonstration Grant/09- 3I/Meadows Creek Estates Rain Garden Project Item 6 Consider Approval Application for Exempt Permit/Andover Lions Club Item 7 Approve Recycling Agreement with Anoka County and the City of Andover Item 8 Consider Approval On -Sale Liquor License /Andover Lanes Item 9 Consider Approval Application for Exempt Permit/The Way of the Shepherd Item 10 Approve Resolution — Call for Public Hearing on the Proposed Adoption of a Modification to the Development District No. 1 and the Proposed Adoption of the Modifications to the TIF Plans for TIF District No. 1 -1 & 1 -2 Redevelopment © Districts. (See Resolution R074 -09) Item 15 Declare Costs, Order Assessment Roll & Schedule Public Hearing for 2009 Delinquent Utility Fees & Fines. (See Resolution R- 75 -09) © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 3 Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Trude, approval of the Consent Agenda as read. Motion carried unanimously. PRESENTATION/TWO RIVERS COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTIHOUSING R EHABILI TA TION IN ANDOVER Ms. Theresa Vanderbent, Executive Director of Two Rivers Community Land Trust made a presentation to the Council and residents regarding the Housing Rehabilitation in Andover. She showed photos of homes that were refurbished. Councilmember Knight asked who their mother organization was. Ms. Vanderbent indicated it is Two Rivers. She explained Two Rivers did not have a national focus. Councilmember Knight asked who they are responsible to. Ms. Vanderbent stated they are responsible to their Board of Directors, County Commissioners, and City Councilmembers and felt it was important to be answerable to the communities in which they work. Councilmember Jacobson stated they help the first time home buyer and then when they sell, the © second buyer for the house and he wondered how far down do they go and when do they get out of a house. Ms. Vanderbent stated they never get out of the house since they own the land under the home permanently so their goal is to always participate in the buying and selling of the house each time. Ms. Vanderbent stated if anyone wanted more information they could go to www.tworiversclt.com PUBLICHEARING IVACATIONOFDRAINAGEAND UTILITYEASEMENTI]5956EAGLE STREET NW Mr. Berkowitz stated the applicant is seeking to vacate a portion of the drainage and utility easement in the rear yard to allow more useable yard space. Motion by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, to open the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. No one wished to address the Council. Motion by Trude, Seconded by Knight, to close the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. © Councilmember Jacobson asked if the applicant has talked to the neighbors on either side to discuss what he wanted to do. Mr. Borgos stated he has talked to the neighbors and both are encouraging him to do what he has asked. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 4 Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to approve the proposed vacation of the drainage and utility easement subject to the conditions of the attached resolution. Motion carried unanimously. (See Resolution R076 -09) CONSIDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMITITELLECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA/PRAIRIE KNOLL PARK Mr. Neumeister stated T- Mobile has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to locate a cellular phone antenna in Prairie Knoll Park at the location of one of the existing light poles of the most westerly ball field. City Code 9 -12 provides the specific requirements for antennas and towers. Mr. Paul Harrington, Carlson & Harrington, Inc., representing T- Mobile was at the meeting to answer questions. Councilmember Jacobson stated after the Park Commission had their meeting and suggested the southeast area of the park, on a technical basis is there any reason which would preclude that as a move. Mr. Harrington indicated it would not. Councilmember Jacobson suggested if it were placed in the southeast portion rather than where the proposal is they could save a lot of money. The three phase power to drive the system is located much closer there, would solve a lot of neighbor concerns, the tower would be of a lesser design and will save money, there would not be plowing of the trail to the equipment building as required in the present area and there would not be any maintenance costs on the trail along with not replacing any of the irrigation system. This would save money and thought this would be a better location than the location on the original application. He noted he was not against putting these in parks. Mr. Harrington stated their location was driven by the natural vegetation on the west side, capitalizing on those things. He also knew the City would like them to replace an existing pole to minimize the impact. Councilmember Trude stated she would like to get this out close to the road and keep utility stuff as close to the road and away from the play of the kids. Mr. Dickinson asked for clarification if Councilmember Jacobson is suggesting a new pole in the southeast area of the park or an existing pole. Councilmember Jacobson stated it would be a new pole. Mayor Gamache stated there are light poles there already. Councilmember Trude stated she is concerned with the size of the building next to an activity being held at the park. Councilmember Bukkila offered a suggestion that there seemed to be a light pole a © significant distance from the football field so the kids would not run into it and there would be access to it off of the road. This goes into a low lying area with drainage and not a well traveled area with no activities around it. Mr. Harrington stated T- Mobile would be amenable to looking at other light poles in the park for Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 5 placement of the antenna. Mayor Gamache asked how close the building needed to be to the antenna. Mr. Harrington stated they try to be close only because the longer the run they need to use larger diameter coax cable which would drive a larger size pole. He thought the intent is to keep the pole as similar as possible to what is there now. The Council reviewed the different pole and building locations with staff for possible alternate locations for the antenna. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Bukkila, to open the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Mr. Dickinson indicated there is no public hearing since it was held at the Planning Commission level. The motion was rescinded and the Council took public comments. © Councilmember Trude stated if the building and pole were to be moved they need to include landscaping requirements in the resolution. Ms. Cindy Hielman, 720 148 th Lane NW, stated her property boarders Prairie Knoll Park. She explained the tower will be less than one hundred meters from their house at the current location which is dangerously close. She stated she was at the meeting to oppose this. She reviewed some research she found with the Council regarding the safety and effects of Electromagnetic Radiation that is emitted from the cell towers. She asked the Council to vote no on this and to take into consideration the health and safety of the kids playing at this park. Mr. Jim Linehan, 665 148 th Lane, stated the pole will be 27 'h feet from the ball field white line to the pole and from the pole to the Hielman's property is 51 feet for a total of 64 feet. He stated one of the things brought up to them was the radiation goes straight up and he found it went 2.5 miles. He explained he drew a map and realized the radiation when dropping down would be very close to his home. He showed some photos of current cell towers in the area showing signs indicating danger of radiation and if there was not a concern he did not think that a sign would be posted. He stated he has seen nothing in any of the reports that will tell him what the cell tower will look like. Mr. Dickinson stated the Council is looking at the CUP and when a building permit is pulled they will need to show the design of the building and cell tower pole, a concept drawing was included in the Council's packet. © Mr. Linehan stated his wife has been a real estate appraiser for years and the one thing they look at is environmental hazards and he would consider this an environmental hazard. He stated an article he read had indicated that property values could be adversely affected up to forty percent and was one hit he was not ready to take. He stated they were promised when the gas line building was put in that it would blend in and not be noticed which was incorrect. He stated the towers he went and looked © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 6 at were in places where kids would not be playing or hazardous to people. Mr. Marty Hielman, 720 148' Lane NW, stated he owned the property next to Prairie Knoll Park. He stated the pine trees are on his property and he could understand the city wanting a tower in the park to make money but the City of Champlin had this same situation and the City put a moratorium on it because the residents did not want it. He did understand the revenue was to remain in the park but this did not happen with the gas line installation and he wondered where the revenue was going to go to because their park has not been improved. He stated he is totally against this. Ms. Lucisin, 835 146' Lane NW, stated she is on the west side, across Palm Street away from the park and she felt this was not the place to put a cell tower. She stated the park was made for recreation and fun for the children and adults of the community and not for utilities. She stated this has no place in the City Park. Ms. Carrie O'Neil, 715 146' Lane, stated they adjoin the park on the west side and she felt she was letting the neighbors down since they ultimately had the papers to sign to let the light poles go into the park and if they would not have done that this would not be an issue now. Mr. Gary Luke, 14755 Sycamore Street, stated he is against the cell tower being placed in the park because there were too many questions about the health issues. Ms. Sandy Hanson, 14700 Sycamore Street, stated she is against this and hoped the Council would say no to this because this is a public park for children in the neighborhood. Ms. Carol Brennen, 645 148` Lane, stated they do not appreciate or want the cell tower in the park. Mayor Gamache stated they have read all of the residents emails and there are studies that are being worked on. He stated he went to a website that he thought would give him information about the issue of cancer. He went to the American Cancer Society website and looked at the information they had on cell towers. He reviewed some of the information he read. He explained they had a number of cell towers in the City now. He stated weighing the safety issues is difficult. Mr. Linehan stated if the Council approves this it will open up the opportunity for the cell phone companies to come in and put cell towers in different parks. Councilmember Jacobson stated he knew the area very well and the people who live there. He stated in regard to radiation the cell towers will put out is very little radiation compared to other types of towers. He understood the residents did not want this but felt they are overreacting to this. He stated he will have to make a decision for the entire City and not just this neighborhood. © Mr. Hielman stated the Council represents the citizens' best interests and there is a neighborhood that has concerns about the cell tower not belonging in the park so however they vote the Council will be responsible for whatever happens to the citizens that live around the area. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 7 Councilmember Trade stated most of the time the towers are on private property and then most of the residents do not get a say. Mr. Dickinson reviewed some of the cell towers in the City and identified that most of the locations are not city owned. He stated they do promote co- location on the towers. Councilmember Trade stated even if this was not allowed in the park there are still ten acre sites around this that would allow the tower to be built which would be owned by private citizens. Mr. Dickinson stated the resident would need to come before the Council for approval. Councilmember Trade stated the Council could not deny them though if it met City Code. City Attorney Baumgartner stated as long as it is allowed in the zoning code the individuals could not be denied. Councilmember Trade stated these types of towers are allowed in the City's large acreage parks. Mr. Lyle Lundquist, 945 140 Lane NW, asked how many towers T- Mobile needed to get coverage. Councilmember Trade stated it depended on the size and level of the tower. Councilmember Knight asked if they had any City sites that would qualify. Mr. Dickinson stated there are a number of pieces of property in the community that are City owned and not park land. As they are approached by consultants as they are trying to locate places for their towers the City looks at all potential areas to place them. The consultant will need to look at the area and if it will work for their needs and then the process begins. Mr. Harrington reviewed with the Council what the cell tower will look like. Councilmember Jacobson stated none of the information they have is designated Exhibit A and he wondered if that is missing from the packet. Mr. Neumeister stated Exhibit A is supposed to be the legal description of Prairie Knoll Park. Councilmember Jacobson stated if they are to approve the resolution they would only be saying yes to the park and no specific location. Mr. Dickinson stated what is referenced for the placement is the condition referring the plan set and the plan set identifies the location in the park and based on the evenings discussion they would have to have the plan set changed to indicate a different location in the park and they also reference there needs to be a license agreement, etc. and they also have to come forward for the building permit and so forth. Councilmember Jacobson stated they would have to get rid of condition three or four of the "Now then therefore it be resolved" in the resolution which would no longer be applicable. Mr. Dickinson indicated if they were going to a single pole anything that relates to a light array would need to come off because they are not reattaching a light array. He stated if they start to talk about a different location they will need to talk about how to access that location. He stated there will be some modifications to the resolution but particularly where the location is in the park is referenced in the plan set and that is how they have done it with the one on Crosstown Drive. Mr. Hielman stated there is an emergency siren on the east side of Prairie Road north of Andover Boulevard and he thought the cell antenna could go on that pole. Mr. Dickinson stated that is not City property, it is an easement and they would have to work with the property owner to place an antenna on there. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 8 Mr. Winslow Holasek stated multiple towers were mentioned and each one gives off radiation so if there were more than one tower would more radiation be emitted. Mr. Harrington stated he is not an expert but the FCC requires them to do a cumulative RF study and each company would have to stay below the limit based on the cumulative number. He stated the signs that are put on the towers are a requirement by the FCC. Councilmember Jacobson stated the frequencies that are being used are those that are being vacated by former public service and the analog TV stations when the Government made the switch to High definition TV which opened up a lot of frequencies that are now going to the cell phone companies so the same frequencies are being used but by different entities. Mr. Harrington stated that was correct. Councilmember Knight asked if they were to use the siren pole it would not be adequate so they would have to add another pole. Mr. Dickinson stated that is correct. Councilmember Knight asked if that is a feasible possibility. Mr. Dickinson stated it is. His understanding that where it is at on Prairie Road the City did not own the land. Mr. Harrington stated that was his first choice when he looked but it is not on City property and the planner also thought that the increase in height that was necessary along with the equipment needed would not make sense from a planning perspective. Mr. Dickinson reviewed with the Council what the motion would need to contain. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Bukkila, to concur with the findings of the Planning Commission and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit request for a telecommunications antenna located at Prairie Knoll Park subject to a change in the plan set to move the tower to the east side of the park and changes in the conditions under the Now Therefore It Be Resolved to reflect the change in the plan set. That resolution is to be brought back to the next Council meeting. Mayor Gamache stated in part of this they reference City Code 9 -12 and he wondered if that was updated recently. Mr. Neumeister stated it was updated about a year and a half ago, he indicated they may need to raise taxes to pay for the parks. Councilmember Knight suggested they go as far north as topography and easements will allow them to go. Mayor Gamache stated that while he did not agree that there is a risk, he kind of stands by his point of the American Cancer Society and some of the other things he has read. He has changed his mind a little bit and it is solely because of the park issue. He stated the more he heard from the residents in ® the room he agrees that this may not be the best place to place a cell tower because it is a park. He agreed that the park issue is the issue and did not think the tower will cause any medical issues. Councilmember Trude stated when they looked at this they did not want to see them in the little tot lot parks but would allow them in the larger regional parks. This helps supplement the parks and © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 9 improvements. They decided to look at only the large parks for these utilities because residents are not that close. Mayor Gamache agreed and understood what she was saying but hated to see something like that go into Prairie Knoll Park. Councilmember Bukkila stated even if the cell tower is not placed in the park they will be putting it somewhere. She agreed with the Mayor on the safety issues and not take that into consideration but what she does have to take into consideration is the budget, tax levy and to a point it is about money because the bottom line is the City is sitting on a tax increase just to support the basic City services and everyone on the Council has huge hopes to continue to fund the parks but they are a great expense and weighing them into the budget is a huge expense. This is one of those opportunities that comes along rarely where this is a venture that will go to an individual property somewhere in the community whether the City capitalizes on it or not, this is an opportunity to help fund the parks and they need it. She stated it is to help the budget and to help the parks and to stave off an increase in taxes. Motion carried 4 ayes, 1 nay ( Gamache). Mr. Linehan stated he understood this will generate revenue but two or three years down the road the Council will raise taxes anyway to help pay for the parks. CONSIDER CODEAMENDMENT /ADD ANIMAL THERAPYFA CILITYAS CONDITIONAL USE Mr. Neumeister stated at the September 15, 2009 Council meeting there was discussion on this issue and staff has -made adjustments to the proposed code amendment to follow the direction given by the Council that evening. The proposed code amendment requires the "Animal Therapy Facility" use to have a minimum of five acres of land in the R -1, R -2 and R -3 zoning districts. A Conditional Use Permit for this type of use will allow the City to attach specific conditions on liability insurance, vet checks of animals, etc. Motion by Knight, Seconded by Trude, to approve the resolution as presented. Mayor Gamache asked how this will affect a large farm. Mr. Neumeister stated this item would not be related to a general farm operation at all. This is more specific and related to animal specific therapy. He reviewed some of the City Code with the Council in regard to this. Mayor Gamache asked how this affected some of the issues regarding this land. Mr. Neumeister stated the owner would have to request a variance to use the building for animals because it is too close to the property line. Councilmember Jacobson stated he still had problems with this item. Under the definition of this Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 10 it is delivered or directed by a health and human services provider and he did not think the applicant is either one of these. This does not talk about housing of the animals at all and does not talk about the number of animals permitted on the property. It does not talk about what types of animals are excluded. He did not think this was thought through well enough to approve. If they are looking for something like a petting zoo it is one thing but he thought this was opening it up to more than what they are considering. City Attorney Baumgartner stated the definition that was inserted was the definition that was consistently used on websites for animal therapy. Councilmember Jacobson asked if the applicant would then need to be a professional. City Attorney Baumgartner stated that is correct. He stated they wanted to limit this program so everyone would not be able to open one up. Councilmember Jacobson asked how a person would go about getting a license for something like this and how would the City determine the legality of that. City Attorney Baumgartner stated he would assume if they are working in the scope of their profession they can verify that. There has to be some mechanism to narrow this down. Councilmember Bukkila asked if this would include a foster parent since they are governed under human services. Councilmember Jacobson stated it indicates it has to be within the scope of his or her profession so they would need to be a professional. Councilmember Jacobson thought there are loop holes in this and should be cleared up before approved. The Council discussed how they would determine the number of animals allowed. Councilmember Trude asked if staff discussed this with the applicant. Mr. Neumeister stated they have not talked with the applicant since the last meeting this was at. Mr. Don Eveland, 2575 Andover Blvd, stated he has a number of severely handicapped kids who visit his farm and they bring their own health professionals and he thought that was what the applicant wanted to do rather than do it themselves. Councilmember Trude thought they needed to clarify the reason for changing the code. Mr. Eveland did not think the City should be involved in this since all the applicant is doing is providing animals and someone else is bringing the kids in. The kids are coming in with a care provider who will work with them and the animals. He thought this was all interpretational. Mr. Neumeister reviewed the reason this was brought before the Council. Councilmember Bukkila stated she would like to get more information regarding the occupation definition. Mayor Gamache stated they could bring this item to a workshop meeting. Mr. Neumeister stated he would see if the applicant could come back in for more discussion at the Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 11 next Council meeting. Councilmember Knight withdrew his motion and Councilmember Trude withdrew her second. Motion by Trude, Seconded by Bukkila, to table this item to a future meeting. Motion carried 4 ayes, 1 nay (Jacobson). ADMINISTRATOR REPORT City Administrator Dickinson updated the Council on the administration and city department activities, meeting reminders, and CIP Projects. Community Development Director Neumeister updated the Council on development activity in the City. MAYORICOUNCIL INPUT (Girl Scout Letter regarding Graffiti) — Mayor Gamache asked if the Council wanted to discuss this letter about ideas on graffiti. Councilmember Bukkila thought there was something in the works with the Boys Scouts. Mr. Dickinson stated he would like a copy to discuss with staff to see if this is being handled. (Andover High School Football) — Mayor Gamache stated the Andover Husky's are undefeated in Football and he reminded the residents to come out and cheer them on. (Council Chamber Improvements) — Councilmember Jacobson stated they have new video cameras in the Council Chambers and he hoped people saw the difference. Councilmember Trude thought the audio sounded a lot better. (League of Women Voters Forum) — Councilmember Trude stated she is involved with the League of Women Voters and if there are any women in the community interested she would be happy to answer questions. In November they are going to be inviting the Mayors from the general region to participate and she will be moderating a forum to talk about conservation of resources, preservation of water quality, open spaces and other topics. The Council recessed at 10:01 p.m. to go into a closed session to discuss Land Purchase Negotiations — PIDs 07 -32 -24 -0001 & 29- 32 -24 -44 -0022. The Council reconvened at 10:42 p.m. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 12 Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Bukkila, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Susan Osbeck, Recording Secretary © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — October 6, 2009 Page 13 REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — OCTOBER 6, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE .......................................................................... ............................... 1 RESIDENTFORUM ....................................................................................... ............................... 1 AGENDAAPPROVAL ................................................................................... ............................... 1 APPROVALOF MINUTES ............................................................................ ............................... 1 CONSENTITEMS .......................................................................................... ............................... 2 Approvalof Claims ...................................................................................... ............................... 2 Receive Assessment Roll /Order Public Hearing /09- 2/2009 Street Reconstruction (See ResolutionR072- 09) ............................................................................... ............................... 2 Receive Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing /08- 37/157" Avenue NW Reconstruction (MSAS 102) (See Resolution R073 -09) ................................................. ............................... 2 Accept CCWD Demonstration Grant/09 -31 /Meadows Creek Estates Rain Garden Project...... 2 Consider Approval Application for Exempt Permit/Andover Lions Club ... ............................... 2 Approve Recycling Agreement with Anoka County and the City of Andover ............................ 2 Consider Approval On -Sale Liquor License /Andover Lanes ....................... ............................... 2 © Consider Approval Application for Exempt Permit/The Way of the Shepherd .......................... 2 Approve Resolution — Call for Public Hearing on the Proposed Adoption of a Modification to the Development District No. 1 and the Proposed Adoption of the Modifications to the TIF Plans for TIF District No. 1 -1 & 1 -2 Redevelopment Districts (See Resolution R074 -09) .. 2 Declare Costs, Order Assessment Roll & Schedule Public Hearing for 2009 Delinquent Utility Fees & Fines (See Resolution R075- 09) ................................................. ............................... 2 PRESENTATION /TWO RIVERS COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTMOUSING REHABILITATION IN ANDOVER ...................................................... ............................... 3 PUBLIC HEARING/VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT /15956 EAGLE STREET NW (See Resolution R076 -09) ................................. ............................... 3 CONSIDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /TELLECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA/PRAIRIE KNOLL PARK ................................................... ............................... 4 CONSIDER CODE AMENDMENT /ADD ANIMAL THERAPY FACILITY AS CONDITIONALUSE ............................................................................. ............................... 9 ADMINISTRATORREPORT ...................................................................... ............................... 11 MAYOR/COUNCIL INPUT ......................................................................... ............................... 11 Girl Scout Letter regarding Graffiti ........................................................... ............................... 11 Andover High School Football .................................................................. ............................... 11 Council Chamber Improvements ............................................................... ............................... 11 League of Women Voters Forum ............................................................... ............................... 11 ADJOURNMENT.......................................................................................... ............................... 12