HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 20, 1989
.' I
o
r "
i
'~-)
,- )
\ .
~j
CA.,'" . "'c~.
0...... "."
'",';';!'
-;' ","",
.L
o
l)
CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING - AGENDA
July 20, 1989
8:00 P.M. 1. Call To Order
2. Residents Forum
3. Approval of Minutes
4. Strootman Park Sign Discussion
5. Kirby Estates - Scheduling of Inspection
6. Recommend Applicants for Park Commission Vacancies
7. Bent Creek Estates - Receive Bids
8 .
9. Adjournment
'0
.~
.~
tr7\\'
'...1'\
u
u
CITY of ANDOVER
Revised
Park Commission Interviews
7:00 P.M. Darrell Delarco
7:10 P.M. Shannon Pearson
7:20 P.M. Robert Rankila
7:30 P.M. Paul Stratman
7:40 P.M. Steven Kubista
7:50 P.M. David Woods
)
,)
\
)
/--"
\.J
u
On July 20, 1989 the Andover Park and Recreation Commission Board met at
7:00 P.M. in the City Hall boardroom to interview applicants for the Park
Board Commission.
Commissioners Present: Chairman Marc McMullen, Tom Anderson, Jeff Kieffer,
Jim Lindahl, William Mamlock
Interviews were scheduled at ten minute intervals per the following
schedule:
7:00 P.M. Darrell Delarco
7:10 P.M. Shannon Pearson
7:20 P.M. Robert Rankila
7:30 P.M. Paul Stratman
7:40 P.M. Steven Kubista
7:50 P.M. David Woods
Chairman McMullen relayed to commissioners that City Council requested Park
and Recreation Commission submit a list ranking park board applicants in order
of recommendation.
Commission members decided to list top four applicants.
Following is a synopsis of each applicant's interview.
Darrell Delarco - Mr. Delarco was asked "If you had a main objective for the
Park and Recreation Commission, what would it be?"
Mr. Delarco replied he would strive for community involvement. He states that
active community involvement makes a strong impact on new residents. He feels
the children of our community are most important and their needs cannot be
neglected. Mr. Delarco added he is a six year resident of the city. He has
been involved with park boards for nine years; most recently with the Anoka
parks for five years. Prior to his Anoka parks experience, he worked four
years with Maple Grove parks.
Chairman McMullen asked Mr. Delarco what he felt he could offer as a member
of the park board. Mr. Delarco stressed his related experience and his financial
background would be assets to the board. He also said he likes to take a
chance on something that hasn't been tried, and he is a very organized person.
Mr. Lindahl asked Mr. Delarco if he felt he
are made concerning his neighborhood park.
no problem with objectivity. He states the
picture and use good business sense.
could be objective when decisions
Mr. Delarco answered that he has
board has to look at the whole
cont'd.. .
Park
Page
\
\. ~
and Recreation commission
Two
Board Interviews
\
U
)
Shannon Pearson - Jim Lindahl asked Ms. Pearson if she was aware of past and
present development trends in Andover. Ms. Pearson answered that while she
is not well versed with Andover parks, she is currently gaining parks experience
in the City of St. Paul. Her duties as an intern with St. Paul Parks Department
include writing press releases, coordinating events and recruiting volunteers.
She added she is a recent graduate of St. Cloud University.
Chairman McMullen asked Ms. Pearson what she felt she could offer as a member
of the park board. Ms. Pearson stated she is a creative person who would offer
new ideas. She has lived in Andover since 1976.
William Mamlock asked Ms. Pearson in what areas she feels Andover park system
is lacking. Ms. Pearson believes parks are not adequately maintained.
Paul Stratman was asked by Chairman McMullen what he felt he could offer as a
member of the park board. Mr. Stratman replied he has mechanical abilities and
past experience in land surveying. He stated he has genuine interest in the
community. It is important to Mr. Stratman that city parks provide a safe
environment for children.
commissioner Kieffer asked Mr. Stratman what he felt should be priorities
of Park Board. Mr. Stratman answered well organized activities are extremely
important.
'. )
Commissioner Lindahl questioned Mr. Stratman's knowledge of the geography of
Andover. Mr. Stratman stated he appreciates the rural atmosphere although he
is still getting to know the area.
Steve Kubista Commissioner Kieffer asked Mr. Kubista if he is familiar with
the Andover park system. Mr. Kubista answered that he hasn't yet had the
opportunity to fully explore parks as he moved to Andover in February 1989.
Mr. Kieffer asked Mr. Kubista what his interest is in the Andover parks.
Mr. Kubista stated that a good park system does a lot for the community. He
is personally interested in this type of community involvement because he
enjoys using the parks for biking and X-country skiing.
William Mamlock asked Mr. Kubista if he is originally from this area. Mr. Kubista
stated he has not previously lived in this area but has worked in area for
past five years.
Jim Lindahl asked Mr. Kubista how he would be an asset to the park board.
Mr. Kubista replied his engineering skills and experience from working with
the City of Bloomington would be strong assets to the board. He also has ideas
for alternate uses for city parks.
Tom Anderson asked Mr. Kubista if he has specific objectives for Andover city
parks. Mr. Kubista states he would like to see a biking and/or X-country ski
trail tying the parks together.
cont'd.. .
)
-,
J
. )
\.~
)
\
\..J \.J
Park and Recreation Commission Board Interviews
Page Three
David Woods Mr. Woods moved to Andover in November 1988. He has past experience
as Director of Country Club Estates (townhomes) Association and expressed a
desire to be part of the decision making team for the Andover Parks Department.
Jeff Kieffer asked Mr. Woods what his objectives are for the park board.
Mr. Woods answered that Andover seems to have a very young population and he
feels park improvements should be based on a young age group. The system
can than build from that base. As a father of young children, Mr. Woods has
a particular concern for the younger kids.
Mr. Woods stated he is willing to learn and work with the commission. His work
involves some travel, but not lengthy overnight trips that would interfer with
his meeting attendance and/or availability to the board.
-end-
o
:J
C)
,u,
U
u
,,(}\
CITY of ANDOVER
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
JULY 20, 1989
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Andover Park and Recreation Commission
was called to order at 8:10 P.M. on Thursday, July 20, 1989 by Chairman
Marc McMullen at the Andover City Hall offices, 1685 Crosstown Blvd., Andover, MN.
Commissioners Present: Chairman Marc McMullen, Tom Anderson, Jeff Kieffer,
Jim Lindahl, William Mamlock
Others Present: Todd Haas, Assistant City Engineer
Frank Stone, Public Works Supervisor
Approval of Minutes
Jeff Kieffer made a MOTION to defer approval of the July 6, 1989 Park Commission
meeting minutes as all commissioners had not received and reviewed. Second to
motion by Tom Anderson.
Strootman Park Sign Discussion
Commissioner Mamlock gave a presentation of two design recommendations for
Strootman sign. Mr. and Mrs. Mamlock began working with six different layouts
and made eliminations and modifications to arrive at the two designs presented.
Mr. Mamlock stated the artwork on signs will be painted and the letters will be
routed. In creating the design, Mr. and Mrs. Mamlock wanted to convey what the
park has to offer. It would be difficult to portray a playground on a sign
without sign appearing cluttered. Mr. Mamlock stated that rectangle sign seems
to work best, although other shapes can be considered.
The artwork on sign included a fisherman. Chairman M~1ullen stated the access at
Strootman Park is a canoe launch, and that a picture of a canoe would be a
more accurate portrayal. Mr. McMullen believes there is an international symbol
for canoeing.
Commissioner Kieffer questioned if commission would be infringing on a trademark
by adapting symbol for city sign.
Discussion followed that symbol is used internationally and will not be used by
city in a sales related manner.
Commissioner Mamlock asked commissioners if they would prefer using international
symbols to artwork. Chairman McMullen would prefer symbols to be routed. He
feels painted artwork may wear and chip. Chairman McMullen also suggested sign
be spaced out by using two boards.
Mr. Mamlock asked commission where he would find the symbols. Jim Lindahl
suggested he refer to a state park guide. He believes this guide indicates all
facilities available within each park. Chairman McMullen requested the design
be changed and presented to park board at 8/03/89 meeting for final approval.
cont 'd. . .
Park and Recreation~/~ission
July 20, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Two
'\.._J
/
Discussion turned to other specifics relating to dedication. Commissioner
Lindahl asked what normal procedure is for park dedication. Commissioner Kieffer
stated this is first "formal" dedication and there is no previous procedure to
follow. Commissioner Kieffer questioned if the time frame was reasonable i.e.,
will sign be complete and can dedication be held in August? Chairman McMullen
stated that Frank Stone intends to have the back stop removed from park by
September, and dedication should be held prior to removal. He also states
the sign maker can complete the sign within two weeks of receiving design
specifics.
Mr. Kieffer noted the exact location of sign has not been determined. He feels
landscaping of some sort should be done near base of sign. Kieffer suggests
shrubs or crushed rock. Other ideas include the use of timber to create a
planter.
Chairman McMullen suggested locating sign behind current back stop. Frank Stone
stated the new back stop is slated for that area.
Jim Lindahl suggested an area approximately 50 feet in size that is between
parking lot and outfield fence.
Chairman McMullen suggests inviting the Strootman family, the mayor and city
council and past park board members to the dedication. Chairman McMullen
added that Darrell Delarco has requested the baseball team be invited to attend.
McMullen suggested the baseball team appear dressed in uniform, if possible.
,
Tom Anderson asked if there will be
be more of an "unveiling" of sign.
asked to speak.
a program. Jim Lindahl said dedication will
commissioner Kieffer suggested the mayor be
)
Frank Stone volunteered to ask the Anoka Union to be present and take photographs.
Chairman McMullen proposed setting a date for dedication. It was decided to
contact the Strootman family to see what date in August would work best.
Commission would suggest August 24 as date most workable for commission members.
Jeff Kieffer will make call to Mrs. Strootman.
Chairman McMullen requested that Melanie DeLuca be present at next meeting.
Kirby Estates
Chairman McMullen stated that representatives from commission must go to Kirby
Estates and decide what area should be assessed for dedication. Todd Haas will
be available July 25 or August 1 to review Kirby Estates. Commissioners Anderson
and Lindahl volunteered to meet Todd Haas and Marc McMullen at 6:30 P.M. on
July 25 at the City Hall.
Bent Creek
Frank Stone received only one bid on Bent Creek Sidewalk. Bid was from Ad Con
for $2900.00. Chairman McMullen stated commission must receive at least one
more bid. Mr. Stone tried to contact developer but developer did not return
call. Previously developer had submitted bid for $1300.00. Mr. Stone also
called a contractor from Anoka for a bid, but contractor did not respond.
'.
)
William Mamlock questioned the difference in bids. Frank Stone stated developer
may not be bidding according to same specs as Ad Con.
cont'd.. .
Park and Recreation \, ,Jmission
July 20, 1989 Meeting-Minutes
Page Three
/
Chairman McMullen decided to table Bent Creek sidewalk discussion until next
meeting.
Selection of Applicants for Park Commission vacancies
Chairman McMullen asked commissioners to rank applicants in order of choice.
The ranking of applicants, in order of choice, is as follows:
1) Darrell DeLarco
2) David Woods
3) Steven Kubista
4) Shannon Pearson
Discussion in choosing applicants revolved around input applicant would provide
to commission, whether it be sports related or centered on alternate activities.
Length of time as a city resident, past experience, and geographic representation
were other considerations.
Jeff Kieffer made a MOTION to present to city council recommendation for
Park Commission vacancies as follows: Darrell Delarco and David Woods.
and second alternates are Steven Kubista and Shannon Pearson. Second to
by William Mamlock. All commissioners voted in favor of motion. Motion
First
motion
passed.
Other Business
Frank Stone reported that money budgeted for Hills of Bunker Lake Park is
$14,200 from the 1990 park dedication fund. A representative from the developer
called and asked when park would be done. Tom Anderson feels the appropriate
\ time to develop park is when second addition is developed.
)
There being no further discussion, MOTION made by Tom Anderson to adjourn.
Second to motion by Jim Lindahl. Meeting adjourned at 9:05 P.M.
Respectful~1 submitted,
~! /w.l:l)oJ Hoqa/fL
Theresa Hogarl
,
\
)