Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC- May 19, 2009 A I I T Y WE �DO ® © 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CLANDOVER.MN.US Regular City Council Meeting — Tuesday, May 19, 2009 Call to Order — 7:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance Resident Forum Agenda Approval 1. Approval of Minutes (4/28/09 Workshop; 5/5/09 Regular; 4/23/09 & 5/5/09 Board of Review) Consent Items 2. Approve Payment of Claims — Finance 3. Approve Refuse/Recycler Hauler Licenses - Administration 4. Approve Temporary 3.2% Malt Liquor License /Andover Lions/Fun Fest - Administration 5. Approve Application for Exempt Permit/Andover Lions Club -Administration 6. Accept Feasibility Report/Waive Public Hearing/Order Plans & Specs/09-22/Bunker Lake Blvd. NW Frontage Road/Jay Street Realignment - Engineering r 7. Approve Final Plat/Woodland Crossings 2 " Addition - Planning © Discussion Items 8. Anoka County Sheriff's Department Monthly Report - Sheriff 9. Consider Conditional Use Permit/Used Vehicle Sale /3149 162 Lane NW - Planning 10. Consider Business License/Used Vehicle Sales/ 3149 162 Lane NW — Planning 11. Consider Variance/Minimum Lot Width Requirements /17285 Round Lake Blvd. NW. - Planning 12. Consider Revised Planned Unit Development/ Andover Clocktower Commons/NE Corner of Hanson and Crosstown Blvds . NW - Planning 13. Consider City Code Amendment/Changes to City Code Title 4 /Abatement Process - Planning 14. Consider City Code Amendment/Changes to City Code Title 9/Regulations for Rental of Single Family Units — Planning 15. Discuss Wetland Buffers/LRRWMO — Engineering 16. Consider Approval/Extension of Liquor License/Beef O'Brady's- Administration Staff Items 17. Schedule EDA Meeting — Administration 18. Schedule June Workshop - Administration 19. Administrator's Report - Administration Mayor /Council Input Adjournment C I T Y G z° 'Ti ' yt e'a �i d REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING — MAY 19, 2009 MINUTES The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Acting Mayor Julie Trude, May 19, 2009, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Councilmembers present: Sheri Bukkila, Don Jacobson, Mike Knight Councilmember absent: Mayor Mike Gamache Also present: City Attorney, Scott Baumgartner Director of Public Works /City Engineer, Dave Berkowitz City Administrator, Jim Dickinson Community Development Director, Will Neumeister Assistant Public Works Director, Todd Haas Others PLEDGE OFALLEGL4NCE RESIDENT FORUM No one wished to address the Council. AGENDA APPROVAL Remove for discussion Item 6, (Accept Feasibility Report/Waive Public Hearing /Order Plans & Specs/09-22/Bunker Lake Blvd NW) and Item 7, (Approve Final Plat/Woodland Crossings 2nd Addition). . Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to approve the Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. CONSENT ITEMS Acting Mayor Trude read the consent agenda items to be approved as follows: ® Mr. Berkowitz reviewed the changes to Item 6 with the Council. Councilmember Knight asked if the median going north in the turn lane to the west will be a painted median. Mr. Berkowitz stated it will be a hard channelization for safety reasons. He stated the entire location throughout this area is currently hard channelization. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 2 Councilmember Knight asked why they would not just paint it into save money. Mr. Berkowitz stated by having the hard channelization here it will remain consistent throughout the area and it would also be for safety reasons. Item 2 Approval of Claims Item 3 Approve Refuse /Recycles Hauler Licenses Item 4 Approve Temporary 3.2% Malt Liquor License /Andover Lions/Fun Fest Item 5 Approve Application for Exempt Permit/Andover Lions Club (See Resolution R043- 09) Item 6 Accept Feasibility Report/Waive Public Hearing/Order Plans & Specs/09-22/Bunker Lake Blvd. NW Frontage Road/Jay Street Realignment (See Resolution R044 -09) Item 7 Approve Final Plat /Woodland Crossings 2 ,d Addition (See Resolution R045 -09) © Acting Mayor Trude stated there was sentence that needed to be added to the hard copy which is to change the date of the plans. Mr. Neumeister reviewed the changes to Item 7 with the Council. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, approval of the Consent Agenda as read and amended. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 28, 2009, Workshop Meeting: Correct as amended. Acting Mayor Trude stated on page 4, they were talking with the individual about the park levy and on line 40 she would like the following comments included: "...pressure off the levy to provide a way to pay for more trails which are typically paid for by new housing." Acting Mayor Trude stated on the inspections they discussed on page 7 she thought they could simplify it by changing the wording to say "The Council continued to discuss with staff what an inspection should include and what they should charge." Councilmember Bukkila stated on page 4, line 38, the sentence should be changed to "... -a no © choose not to Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Bukkila, approval of Minutes as indicated above. Motion carried unanimously. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 3 May 5, 2009, Regular Meeting: Correct as amended. Acting Mayor Trude stated on page three, line 32 there was a misspelling "cognizant" and should be corrected. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, approval of Minutes as indicated above. Motion carried unanimously. April 23, and May 5, 2009, Board of Review Meeting: Correct as amended. Councilmember Jacobson stated on page two, line 29 of the April 23` minutes the sentence reads "sale took place after that date had no impact emphasis on his valuation ". The word "emphasis" is incorrect and should read "impact ". Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Bukkila, approval of Minutes as indicated above. Motion carried unanimously. © RECEIVEANOKACOUNTYSHERIFFDEPARTMENTMONTHLYREPORT Captain Tom Wells, Anoka County Sheriff's Department, provided an update on law enforcement activities occurring within Andover. Councilmember Knight reminded people not to leave property in view in their vehicles and to close garage doors. CONSIDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMITIUSED VEHICLE SALE13149 162 ND LANE NW City Code requires Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit and a city license for used vehicle sales in the Limited Industrial Zoning District. Mr. Neumeister reviewed the information and changes with the Council. Councilmember Trude stated the State License application states there needs to be room for five vehicle stalls and the applicant information indicates they will have only one. Mr. Neumeister stated there are extra stalls on the site for displaying vehicles. The applicant indicated he did not need that many stalls, only one. Mr. Dickinson explained the site does have room for five stalls if needed. Mr. Neumeister stated a condition that should be added to this is: "the signage would be per City Code." There is no record of the signage being requested. Councilmember Bukkila noted that on a site visit on May 18, 2009 there has been a newly installed fence around the parameter of the parking lot and she received an email from a resident © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 4 with a concern about having cars parked out along the boulevard or right -of -way or in front of the business. She wondered if it is intended to keep the vehicle for sale within the fenced in area. Mr. Dickinson stated it would be in a designated stall shown on the drawing. Based on where the fencing is on the lot, it would need to be within the fence. Councilmember Jacobson asked in their vehicle sales standards they have in their packets the back page, item H reads "the estimated value of improvements to the licensed property shall exceed the estimated land value of the licensed property as estimated by Anoka County." He wondered how this article would or would not relate to the application they have before them. City Attorney Baumgartner thought it was talking about conveying the requirement that they cannot just have a lot there with cars for sale without improvements to the property itself showing an investment to the property. Councilmember Jacobson asked if this is leased office space, would this not apply. City Attorney Baumgartner did not know if this is true and did not know if the distinction is being made. He thought the intent is it would not just be a vacant lot to park vehicles in, there needed to be more of an investment into the property. © The Council discussed possible improvements to the property that could be done. Mr. Frank Sudd, 15956 Drake Street, described his business to the Council. Acting Mayor Trude asked if Mr. Sudd noticed the fence that went around the lot. Mr. Sudd stated he was not aware that the fence was put in and would need to talk to the owner about it. Mr. Dickinson stated the City would also talk to the owner. Mr. Joe Brabant, 16191 Round Lake Boulevard, read a letter to the Council that he is not opposed to Mr. Sudd's application to sell vehicles but he is looking for someone to be accountable to the expansion of the north end of the parking lot located at 3149 162 Lane NW. He stated he is required to do a lot of major improvements to his property when he opened his car sales business but this property has not needed to do any major improvements. He continued to express his concerns about issues related to the applicants proposed business site. Acting Mayor Trude indicated staff did follow up on Mr. Brabant's questions and the staff report indicates there was an review of the aerial photography and pavement for the parking area was expanded from the north end of the building to where it exists today sometime between 2006 and 2008. There is no record of discussion with the property owner about expansion of the parking area. The deficiencies of the parking area include lack of curb and gutter and the setback from the east property line as noted in the table in the packet. She noted the owner of the property did © not appear to get a permit for the expansion and now a fence was installed possibly without a permit and staff will be talking to the owner in regard to this. Mr. Neumeister reviewed the improvements the owner did to the site and explained at the time the parking area was paved there was no requirement to obtain a separate permit. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 5 The Council discussed with staff improvement issues of the property and how they could get the owner to correct them. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to table this item to the next City Council meeting to allow staff time to contact the owner of the property and discuss issues related to the property. Councilmember Knight asked what the remaining stalls will be filled with. Mr. Dickinson thought the remaining stalls will be used for the other business in the building along with employee parking. Acting Mayor Trude thought it would be important to clarify the State Licensing requirements before the next meeting to make sure they can be met before continuing the application. She also suggested that hours of operation be submitted and also a landscaping plan. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER BUSINESS LICENSE/USED VEHICLE SALES 13149162 LANE NW The ordinance for vehicle sales requires Council approval of a business license. The applicant has paid the application fee. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to table this item to the next City Council meeting to allow staff time to contact the owner of the property and discuss issues related to the property. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER VARMNCE/MINIMUML0T WIDTHREQUIREMENTS /17285R0UNDLAKE BOULEVARD NW The applicant would like to divide their 9.69 acre parcel into two lots at some point in the future. The property is long and narrow and without access to the rear of the lot. Mr. Neumeister reviewed the information with the Council. Councilmember Jacobson recused himself from this item because of a possible conflict of interest. Since Connexus Energy is potentially involved in this transaction. © Councilmember Bukkila asked why the City needed to give the applicant access, could the applicant purchase the property from Connexus. Mr. Neumeister stated the applicant is trying to do that but the sixty -six feet is not three hundred, they need at least three hundred feet, pre ordinance to accomplish what they are hoping to do. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes —May 19, 2009 Page 6 Councilmember Bukkila asked if the property owner owns the land and has an easement on the property can't they use it without City permission as a point of access. Mr. Neumeister stated if the owner is going to split the lot they need City permission. Councilmember Bukkila stated if the owner is going to split the lot they should apply for a proposed lot split instead. Mr. Neumeister stated that is correct but if split it would be in the future. Councilmember Knight wondered what happens to the adjacent property since it is equally land locked. Mr. Neumeister stated this raises a question about future development of the area and they would want to know all the information at that time. Acting Mayor Trude wondered if they could include a lot split with this to save the applicant some money. She thought they were coming forward with this sideways and should be pursuing other means. Staff discussed with the Council options the applicant could do in regard to this property. Ms. Susie Larson, 17285 Round Lake Boulevard, stated the initial idea of buying land from Connexus was to be able to have access to the back of their property so they could build a house in the future further from Round Lake Boulevard for more peace and quiet. She indicated they did not have any intention of developing their land. Acting Mayor Trude stated if the Council approves this development of the land could be possible because a road would need to be run up to the next property owners land. She stated the Council is a little reluctant to approve this since the plans are so uncertain. Mr. Dickinson asked if it is the desire of the applicant to pursue a lot split because if it was they could table this to bring forward an administrative lot split along with the variance at the next meeting. Councilmember Bukkila asked if the neighbors would understand the expansion of this if the applicant wanted this. Mr. Dickinson stated an administrative lot split would not require a public hearing but would allow the applicant to continue on with the variance. Mr. Matthews, 2857 172 Avenue, stated he did not care if the applicant built back there. They can access the land by removing the trees. He stated he did not want an open road back there because there is a lot of vandalism and he does not want to have to watch the area back there along with the front. He wanted to make sure they did not take part of his land for the landlocked parcels. Motion by Knight, Seconded by Bukkila, to table this item to secure a letter from the applicant; and allow for the applicant to submit a lot split application. Motion carried unanimously. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 7 CONSIDER REVISED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT /ANDOVER CLOCKTOWER COMMONS/NE CORNER OF HANSONAND CROSSTOWN BLVDS NW BDT Holdings, the current owner of Andover Clocktower Commons, is seeking direct access to Crosstown Boulevard NW. Mr. Berkowitz reviewed the information with the Council. Councilmember Jacobson asked if this were constructed as the City was suggesting and if the Holasek property were to develop in the future how much of the intersection would have to be removed when the parcel to the south would develop. Mr. Berkowitz stated it all depends on what access is approved. He stated if a right - in/right -out access is approved on the south side then most of the improvements can stay the way they are currently designed. If they get into an intersection improvement at Bluebird Street and Crosstown Boulevard along with some type of access in mid block that might change what can stay and what cannot. They will work with what is there and keep what is there and minimize the impact in the future. © Mr. Darren Lazan asked if the Clocktower Commons business owners present at the meeting could talk so they could get back to their businesses. Mr. Matt Zeece, Beef O'Brady's, 15190 Bluebird, stated he is in support of getting an intersection and felt it would be good for business and would help bring in business. Ms. Hailey Ryder, Manager Great Clips, stated they are a struggling mall and people do not know they are even there because they cannot see what is in the mall. She stated the Bluebird Street and Crosstown Boulevard intersection is already unsafe and she thought an alternate access would be helpful. She thought it would be safer to have turn lanes and would help bring people in to the mall. Ms. Kelly Casey, Computer Whatever, encouraged the Council to support the access. Councilmember Jacobson stated the applicant and staff have discussed many of the points in the memorandum they received and agreed to most of them except three items. The first one is that the applicant wants stripping and City staff wants concrete barriers, the second is the applicant does not want a right turn lane and staff wants one and the third issue is the actual design of the pork chop median. Mr. Darren Lazan and Mr. Tom Roberts made a presentation to the Council about how they wanted the intersection to look and the reasons for their design. ® Acting Mayor Trade wondered if the road could be reclassified as urban instead of rural since the road is now a City road and not a County road. Mr. Berkowitz stated there would have to be a lot of improvements made on the road to bring it up to urban standards such as curb and gutter. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 8 Councilmember Knight thought this road is more urban than other roads in Andover that are classified as urban. He thought 40mph is a better speed limit along this road than 55mph. Mr. Lazan continued his presentation to the Council regarding the intersection, safety and layout. Councilmember Knight suggested putting in posts and cables in the median in order to make the area safer. Mr. Berkowitz stated it would likely not work because there needs to be a wider median or separator for that design to work properly. Mr. Lazan stated he did not believe a raised channelization is a fair and reasonable request as it relates to this improvement since it is not done anywhere else. Councilmember Bukkila thought the whole concept for this intersection is to bring business to the mall so it will grow and there is a reasonable expectation that traffic will increase as the population grows so they need to do the best they can to anticipate some level of growth. They need to look a little bit more long term than this year. She stated that she found out the stopping speed at 55mph is eighty feet therefore the right turn lane at a shortened distance would likely be ® adequate. She thought a right turn lane was necessary and lessens the probability for accidents and also the idea is if they want to go with painted versus a concrete median, she would want the right turn lane so there is an exit option. Acting Mayor Trude supported the comment. Mr. Lazan stated the first part of the statement is correct and they are looking forward to adding the left turn lane even though it is not needed today. He stated they can provide the right turn lane as long as there are no needed safety improvements along the ditch section already there. Council consensus was they needed a westbound right turn lane on Crosstown Boulevard. Councilmember Jacobson thought the biggest concern is the striping versus the concrete median and thought that is where the safety issue came into play. He noted he is leaning towards the concrete median in the road to prevent people from turning to the east. Councilmember Knight stated he thought the painted striping is fine since they have it in many places in the City including in front of City Hall. Acting Mayor Trude agreed. Mr. Lazan thought it was important if they were directed to work with staff on this because there is no storm sewer available and no place to pipe the water to. He stated there is nowhere to put the water until storm sewer improvements are done, when the entire road is rebuilt. He stated in regard to the concrete median it is not only a cost issue and they want to make a reasonable improvement here but this is not reasonable because other intersections in the City, along 10 Crosstown, do not require concrete medians. He thought this was beyond reasonable. Mr. Berkowitz gave the Council staff s assessment of the improvements and the reasons why they were requesting the improvements to be made. He stated they have to look at this as a permanent improvement and have to look into the future for the City. © Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 9 Mr. Berkowitz indicated that what staff has proposed for improvements is what they are comfortable with as far as safety concerns go. Acting Mayor Trude summarized what the Council wanted to see with the intersection. She stated there seemed to be support for adding a westbound right turn lane to the proposal the applicant has. They want to see the access happen along with some of the safety issues done now but she did not think there should be a full build out otherwise the entire project collapses. There should be a shortened right turn lane that fits the intersection along with a pork chop median extension. Mr. Dickinson recapped the proposal from City Staff with the Council, clarifying the amount of proposed concrete medians and reiterated why staff thought the medians are needed. Councilmember Jacobson stated he would not vote in favor of this if there is not a concrete median. Acting Mayor Trude did not think the majority of the Council wanted a concrete median. Councilmember Jacobson stated it all depended on how long the median was and should be discussed further. Councilmember Bukkila stated she would not be in favor of a Q concrete median. Councilmember Knight stated he would be in favor of more striping. There was further discussion between Council, Staff and the applicant regarding the median and tabling this item. Mr. Lazan requested the Council approve this item with what was discussed and what the Council wanted to have improved. Mr. Lazan indicated that if there are too many requirements no project will likely be done. Acting Mayor Trude stated they are discussing to table this item in order to have staff rework their current plan to include what the Council wanted and what the applicant discussed and bring it back to the next meeting for further discussion and possible approval. 1VIr. Dickinson summarized what would get discussed, a westbound right turn lane, a pork chop median extension and appropriate channelization on Crosstown Boulevard. Motion by Knight, Seconded by Trude, to table this to the June 2, 2009 meeting to allow staff to rework the current plan to include Council's comments. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Bukkila, to amend the agenda to move Items 14, 15 and 16 before Item 13. Motion carried unanimously. Q CONSIDER CODE AMENDMENT /CHANGES TO CITY CODE TITLE 91REGULATIONS FOR RENTAL OF SINGLE FAMILY UNITS The draft amendment incorporates changes to the Rental Housing Dwellings, Chapter #8 of the City Code. The intent of the amendment is to facilitate a single family market value preservation Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 10 initiative by including rental license requirements for single family dwelling units. The prominent change proposed in the draft amendment attached, includes the requirement of a rental license for single family dwelling units with the addition of Section 9 -8 -12. The City Code currently only requires rental licenses for multi - family dwelling units. The draft amendment provides minor changes to other sections within Chapter #8 while keeping all rental ordinances in the same chapter. Mr. Neumeister reviewed the information with the Council. Mr. Barry Swingle, 2547 140' Lane, asked if anyone could move out of their home and bring renters in. The Council indicated they could. He explained some of the problems he is having in his neighborhood with rental properties and indicated he would be in favor of this. Mr. Ken Orttel, 2772 Bunker Lake Boulevard, wondered why this is being looked at since as far as he knew there are not many problems. He stated he has had rental properties for years and has never had any complaints that he was aware of. He wondered why the landlords were not notified that this would apply to them. He did not think it would have been a big deal and the City could have gotten feedback from them regarding this. He stated they have an ordinance for multi - family that they want to adapt to single family and he wondered how much data they have on multi- family problems. Mr. Dickinson stated there are a number of multi - family homes that are in the foreclosure process, not occupied and not licensed. They do get calls for questions about rental units but did not keep specific data outside of police calls. Mr. Orttel stated he has an issue with selective enforcement being done in the City. He stated the City cannot enforce the multi - family ordinance and now want to incorporate it into single family rentals. He did not think it made sense. Mr. Orttel stated he has an issue regarding Chapter 8 that puts the onus on the landlord to resolve crime issues that the government is not able to solve and he thought this was absurd. He is surprised the City has not done a study to find out if there are issues with the Police. Mr. Orttel stated the greatest call areas are public areas such as parks, clinics, The Farmstead and Target and they are inspected yearly, which the City residents pays for, but not licensed yearly and he thought the City needed to look at this and think about requiring licensing for those places also. Mr. Orttel stated as a landlord he pays twice as much property tax versus owners and he wondered where that money went. Mr. Don Peterson, 1374 161' Avenue NW, stated if Andover is having problems with rental properties, as a landlord he can understand the City licensing to weed out the problem landlords and properties but it would simply require applying for a license and obeying existing laws. A license would cost around $20 and last as long as the landlord was leasing out the property. If Q Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes —May 19, 2009 Page 11 there was a problem with the property the City would know the property was a rental and who owned it and could work with the landlord to solve the problem. Most landlords would appreciate knowing if there are any illegal actions happening on their properties. The single family rental initiative goes beyond that. It is based on the assumption that renters and landlords are lowlife and deserve to be treated that way. The rules that should apply to everyone are being enforced disproportionately on renters and rental property and the money is being charged beyond the cost of a simple license. He thought if the City needs money there are ways to increase revenue that do not involve what amounts to taxing a minority of the citizens. He thought this should be enforced to everyone. Councilmember Bukkila stated on page 22, under 9 -8 -11 Section C, she would like to exclude miscellaneous juvenile status crimes, curfew incidence as well as domestic disturbances. Councilmember Jacobson stated on page 10, under Item 2- Inspections, Item A, Emergency, "...representative is authorized to enter a rental dwelling without the permission of the property owner." He understood an emergency or life threatening situation but he would not want someone to enter a dwelling without owner or renter permission. City Attorney Baumgartner thought at the end of the sentence some wording should be added reading "..., after reasonable attempts to obtain said permission have failed." Motion by Bukkila, Seconded by Jacobson, to adopt the ordinance with the two amendments made in discussion and also adopt the summary ordinance that will be published in the Anoka Union. Motion carried unanimously. (Ordinance 381) Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to approve the single family dwelling license application and attached materials (FAQ). Motion carried unanimously. DISCUSS WETLAND BUFFERSILRRWMO The City Council is requested to discuss the status of the Lower Rum River WMO (LRRWMO) P Generation Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan and discuss items that will have an impact to all the cities that are part of the organization. Mr. Todd Haas reviewed the information with the Council. Mr. Dennis Rodecker, Anoka Conservation District, made a presentation to the Council. Councilmember Jacobson asked if the policy is adopted does the City have to conform to this or could the City set their own policy. Mr. Rodecker stated if the Lower Rum adopts a buffer policy then the city will have to conform to that policy. Acting Mayor Trude stated she liked the comment about looking at the individual situation and not just across the board because of the flat topography most of the City has and the sandy soils Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 12 in some areas so the buffer may be smaller. Mr. Rodecker stated that was correct. Acting Mayor Trude stated once the buffer land disappears then the wetland starts to disappear and she has seen a lot of that happen just in her neighborhood. Mr. Berkowitz stated the way the Coon Creek Watershed gets around this is they put in the word "may ", "we may require a buffer to be fifteen to twenty -five feet", that allows an opening for them. Acting Mayor Trude thought there is a lot of value in protecting the waterways. Mr. Rodecker stated buffers are only one tool. Acting Mayor Trude stated buffers are usually attractive, low maintenance, natural landscapes. Councilmember Jacobson asked if the permanent boundary markers and signage costs to be borne by the developers and not cities. Mr. Rodecker stated that is usually the case. Acting Mayor Trude wondered because of the lateness of the hour if they could have this brought back for further discussion. © There was further discussion about what the Council would like to further discuss. Acting Mayor Trude thought it would be helpful for residents to learn more about this and have some articles included in the newsletter. CONSIDER APPROVAL/EXTENSION OF LIQUOR LICENSEBEEF O'BRADY'S Mr. Tony Zeece, Beef O'Brady's, has submitted a request for an extension of his liquor license. Beef O'Brady's is planning to hold an outdoor event May 23, 2009 Memorial Day weekend and would like Council to approve an extension of their liquor license to include a portion of the parking lot in front of the patio area. Previous Council discussion was to limit these types of events to the months of June, July and August. Mr. Dickinson reviewed the information with the Council. Motion by Knight, Seconded by Bukkila, to approve the extension of liquor license to include a portion of the parking lot submitted by Beef O'Brady's for May 23, 2009. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 13 SCHEDULE EDA MEETING The Council is requested to schedule an EDA meeting at 6:00 p.m. before the June 2, 2009 City Council meeting. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to schedule an EDA meeting for June 2, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. SCHEDULE JUNE WORKSHOP The Council is requested to schedule a Council Workshop for the month of June for a number of miscellaneous business items. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Bukkila, to schedule a June Workshop for June 23, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER CITY CODEAMENDMENT /CHANGES TO CITY CODE TITLE 4 1ABATEMENT PROCESS The Council tabled this item until the next City Council meeting. Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to table this item until the next City Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATOR REPORT City Administrator Dickinson updated the Council on the administration and city department Activities, CIP Projects and meetings. MAYORICOUNCIL INPUT There was none. Motion by Knight, Seconded by Bukkila, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting © adjourned at 11:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Susan Osbeck, Recording Secretary Q Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — May 19, 2009 Page 14 REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — MAY 19, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE .......................................................................... ............................... 1 RESIDENTFORUM ....................................................................................... ............................... 1 AGENDAAPPROVAL ................................................................................... ............................... 1 CONSENTITEMS .......................................................................................... ............................... 1 Approvalof Claims ...................................................................................... ............................... 2 Approve Refuse/Recycler Hauler Licenses .................................................. ............................... 2 Approve Temporary 3.2% Malt Liquor License /Andover Lions /Fun Fest .. ............................... 2 Approve Application for Exempt Permit/Andover Lions Club (See Resolution R043 -09) ....... 2 Accept Feasibility Report /Waive Public Hearing/Order Plans & Specs /09 -22 /Bunker Lake Blvd. NW Frontage Road /Jay Street Realignment (See Resolution R044- 09) ..................... 2 Approve Final Plat/Woodland Crossings 2" d Addition (See Resolution R045 -09) .................... 2 APPROVALOF MINUTES ............................................................................ ............................... 2 RECEIVE ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT ..................... 3 CONSIDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/USED VEHICLE SALE /3149 162 LANE NW (Motion to Table) ............................................................................................. ............................... 3 CONSIDER BUSINESS LICENSE /USED VEHICLE SALES /3149 162 LANE NW (Motion toTable) ........................................................................................................... ............................... 5 CONSIDER VARIANCE /MINIMUM LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS /17285 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW (Motion to Table) ....................................................... ............................... 5 CONSIDER REVISED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT /ANDOVER CLOCKTOWER COMMONS/NE CORNER OF HANSON AND CROSSTOWN BLVDS NW (Motion to Table) ............................................................................................................... ............................... 7 CONSIDER CODE AMENDMENT /CHANGES TO CITY CODE TITLE 9 /REGULATIONS FOR RENTAL OF SINGLE FAMILY UNITS (Ordinance 381) ............... ............................... 9 DISCUSS WETLAND BUFFERS/ LRRWMO ............................................. ............................... 11 CONSIDER APPROVAL /EXTENSION OF LIQUOR LICENSE /BEEF O'BRADY'S ............ 12 SCHEDULE EDA MEETING ....................................................................... ............................... 13 SCHEDULE JUNE WORKSHOP ................................................................ ............................... 13 CONSIDER CITY CODE AMENDMENT /CHANGES TO CITY CODE TITLE 4 /ABATEMENT PROCESS (Motion to Table) ....................................... ............................... 13 ADMINISTRATOR REPORT ...................................................................... ............................... 13 MAYOR/COUNCIL INPUT ......................................................................... ............................... 13 ADJOURNMENT.......................................................................................... ............................... 13