Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 24, 1994 . "- , \. ----' / '\ "./ r, \./ ",'~ ~~"""'" "'~tj F' " U (j CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 ANDOVER PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA May 24, 1994 The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission will hold their regular meeting on Tuesday, May 24, 1994 at the City Hall Offices, 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes: May 10, 1994 3. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat - Sharon's Second Addition - Section 26 - Raintree Realty. 4 . Public Hearing: preliminary Plat - SuperAmerica Addition - Section 35 - SuperAmerica, Inc. 5. Public Hearing: Special Use Permit - Liquor License - 18xx Bunker Lake Boulevard (PIN 34-32- 24-13-0001) - Brad Povlitzki. 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment u \]~ CW\.CJ ~~ lP II~ /q,,-/ CJ ~' CITY of ANDOVER -""",-,. ",,,,.,,,.,', .".~ .,'''....:.", 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - MAY 24, 1994 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Jay Squires on May 24, 1994, 7:00 p.m. at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Bonnie Dehn, Randy Peek, Bev Jovanovich, Jerry Putnam Maynard Apel, Becky Pease Assistant City Engineer, Todd Haas City Planner, David Carlberg Others Commissioners absent: Also present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES May 10, 1994: Pages 14 and 15, correct spelling of "massage" in all places it is used. CJ MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Dehn, approval as amended. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2-Absent (Apel, Pease) vote. PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT - SHARON'S SECOND ADDITION, SECTION 26 - RAINTREE REALTY 7:03 P.M. Mr. Haas reviewed the preliminary plat of Sharon's 2nd Addition being developed by Raintree Realty. The proposed subdivision is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban and is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Eight lots are being proposed, and variances for lot depth will be needed for Lots 2 and 7, Block 1. Staff is recommending approval of the variances because of the cul-de-sac needed because of the existing wetlands to the south. The grading plan has been accepted by the City. Commissioner Peek asked whether the new setback requirements for side patios are being applied. Staff explained that is reviewed by the Building Department when the building permit is pulled. MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Jovanovich, to open the public hearing at this time. Motion carried on as-Yes, 2-Absent (Apel, Pease) vote. 7:10 p.m. " '\ V Linda Lee Even, 14559 Drake - asked what kind of houses will be built there. Ron Smith, Raintree Realtv - stated they will be very nice homes, compatable with the neighborhood, over $100,000 in price. Ms. Even - asked whether all the trees will be removed. \ I '---~ \.) \ , Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 Page 2 ,j (Public Hearing: Sharon's Second Preliminary Plat, Continued) Mr. Smith - noted the row of trees on the east will remain, plus the wooded lots on the west side. Whatever they can leave, they will, noting the City's Tree Preservation Plan which they must follow. Mr. Haas stated the Tree Preservation Plan will be followed, though some trees will need to be removed to make the lots meet ordinance. A resident asked if that is the maximum number of houses that will fit in that area and the reason for it. Mr. Haas stated the developer meets the minimum requirements of the ordinance. Mr. Smith explained City lots with sewer and water average the size proposed. MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2-Absent (Apel, Pease) vote. 7:14 p.m. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Dehn, to forward the draft Resolution to the City Council with the recommendation for approval. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2-Absent (Apel, Pease) vote. Mr. Carlberg noted this will be on the June 7, 1994, City Council agenda. 7:16 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT - SUPERAMERICA ADDITION, SECTION 35 - \ _J SUPERAMERICA, INC. Mr. Haas stated SuperAmerica met with representatives of the Coon Creek Watershed and US Army Corps of Engineers today. The permit issued last year from both of those agencies has to be revised because of the modifications being proposed. Because the amount of wetland being disturbed is over three acres, SuperAmerica needs to apply for an individual permit which requires public hearings be held. SuperAmerica is looking to change its proposal to avoid that process. They may have to change the grading and may look at eliminating some of the lots to comply with both agencies. The Corps of Engineers wants to review the effect of how the proposal will disturb the current wetland functions. The proposed building will stay in its original location. They have approval from the Building Department to go ahead with the construction of that building, but they cannot get the financing to start construction without approval of the preliminary and the final plat. Construction will be held up until the necessary permits are received. Mr. Haas stated he advised SuperAmerica to table this item indefinitely until they can obtain approval from the Coon Creek Watershed and the Corps of Engineers. He presented a faxed letter received from Steven Martinson, Construction Manager, asking the item to be tabled indefinitely pending permit approval. \ '-~ The Commission was concerned that SuperAmerica continue to keep the residents informed. One resident indicated she has been in contact with SuperAmerica because her property abuts the site, and she gave permission to come onto her property to do the drainage and utility work. Mr. Haas stated the residents will be renotified when the public hearing is held on the preliminary plat proposal. c) \ U , "\ '-- / Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 Page 3 (Public Hearing: SuperAmerica Preliminary Plat, Continued) MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Peek, that we accept the request to table from SuperAmerica, to be scheduled indefinitely. Motion carried on a 5- Yes, 2-Absent (Apel, Pease) vote. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - LIQUOR LICENSE - 18XX BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD (PIN 34-32-24-13-0001) - BRAD POVLITZKI 7:25 P.M. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of Brad Povlitzki for a Special Use Permit for a liquor license to operate a restaurant/bar with softball fields and volleyball courts at 18xx Bunker Lake Boulevard NW. He noted the applicable ordinances and criteria to be used in granting a Special Use Permit. Staff has determined the proposal would not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; that the use would increase the traffic flow onto Bunker Lake Boulevard; that the use will not have a negative effect on the values of property and scenic view in the surrounding area; and that the use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The facility and operation would be very similar to the Village Inn in White Bear Lake. The site is 30 acres total, but the "\ facilities are proposed to be located in the southeast quadrant. , ~ The Commission was concerned with what will happen with the northwest portion of the property, that area abutting the residential area. Mr. Carlberg stated there would be the potential to subdivide it in the future. The property is now owned by Ron Roth of Wasteco, who has given approval for this request; and the applicant has an option agreement to purchase the property contingent upon receiving approval of the liquor license. A condition the Commission may wish to place in the Permit is the license would stay with the operation in the southeast corner in the event the property is subdivided. Any adjacent lots that would be created would not have the liquor license. He also suggested adding the condition that the applicant successfully apply and complete the liquor license application process. The Commission had several questions pertaining to the proposed operation itself. Mr. Carlberg explained it is proposed to be a family atmosphere with two ball fields and two volleyball courts. The area is treed, and the application will have to comply with the Tree Preservation Plan. It would be in the best interest of the applicant to keep the area screened as much as possible to make it aesthetically pleasing. The wetland area does a good job of separating the area to the north. That wetland cannot be crossed. ,- ''\ \_) Since the proposal is to create a family atmosphere, Commissioner Jovanovich asked if they will provide a playground for the children. Brad Povlitzki - stated there will be an arcade, a restaurant, seating inside or on the patio where spouses and children can watch the games. It is completely access controlled. There are only two ball fields; whereas SRO in Oak Grove has six fields which are not access controlled. :' \ ',-- .J o , , Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 Page 4 ,,_j (Public Hearing: Special Use Permit/Liquor License/povlitzki, Continued) Commissioner Jovanovich stated she spoke with City Staff at Oak Grove concerning SRO. They do get a lot of families and feel a play area for the children would be beneficial. Another concern of the residents is the lights on the fields. She. 0..\:::'0 o.5k€d .,~~~ lJ,..)\ \\ 'ee..:se.rvtY\Q more- '\-ho..v"\ 0.. brea. \<..~o.s-\- VV"~. -' MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Peek, to open the public hearing at this time. Motion carried on as-Yes, 2-Absent (Apel, Pease) vote. 7:40 p.m. Brad Povlitzki - stated there will be breakfast on weekends; he wasn't sure about week days yet. The remaining menu will be similar to other sports bars. Softball will be his promotional item. The proposed hours of operation would be 8 a.m. to 1 a.m. on weekends; 10 a.m. to 1 a.m. on week days. Softball fields would be 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on weekends; 6 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on week nights. The lights would be directed toward the ball fields. , ) Mr. Povlitzki stated the entire area will be fenced in, so the only way to access the fields and courts is through the restaurant/bar. He is aware of the possibility of Jay Street being extended north along the eastern border of this property. The nearest resident will be about 700 feet away. Mr. Carlberg stated he received no calls from neighboring residents, though one resident from Andover Boulevard called with a concern. Brad Povlitzki - stated liquor would be allowed on the deck, but there would be no drinking on the fields. People can come out of the bar onto the deck. Then there will be three to four steps down onto the fields, where drinks will not be allowed. He is not trying to create an atmosphere of parties. He hopes to hold national qualifying tournaments and will have softball leagues. Discussion was on the location of the existing wetland and the possible future subdivision of the property. The Commission was concerned with the ability to add other ball fields. Mr. Carlberg stated that is a permitted use on the property now. The issue is the Special Use Permit for a liquor license. Brad Povlitzki - stated he has no intention of adding other ball fields. Again, he stated the fields will be totally access controlled. They cannot get onto the fields without going through the club. He wouldn't be buying this much land, but the seller will only sell the entire parcel, not divide it for the acreage needed for the project. \ .J Paul Olson, 2041 139th Avenue NW - asked if the Commission is aware of the Povlitzki bar in Spring Lake Park. He alleged the police are sent to that establishment regularly. Softball is played only three months a year, asking what will happen the remainder of the year. He stated a bar is not needed by the residential area. Brad Povlitzki - stated the softball season is 26 weeks. , '\ U u " "\ '-~ Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 Page 5 (Public Hearing: Special Use Permit/Liquor License/povlitzki, Continued) Richard Povlitzki, Brad's father - stated they have been in the bar business for 35 years, and he has never lost his liquor license. The intent is to run a good business. The bar in Spring Lake Park is a working man's bar, a construction bar. This will have more of a family atmosphere like Applebee's or Champs and will sell food. People cannot corne in except through the front door. All lights will face the highway, and there will be buffering with the trees. If they could have purchased just the southern portion of the property, the residents to the northwest would not have received notice of this hearing because it is beyond the limits set out in the ordinance. He did not understand the complaints. Commissioner Dehn was extremely concerned about the increased traffic onto Bunker Lake Boulevard that this establishment will produce. Mr. Carlberg explained right now the access would be directly onto Bunker Lake Boulevard. If Jay Street is constructed in the future, that access probably should be changed to Jay Street; and if traffic meets warrants, the county would install traffic lights at Jay and Bunker Lake Boulevard. Also, Bunker Lake Boulevard is a county road that is expected to be updated to four lanes in the future; and this area is zoned for commercial uses. He did not feel it is a large issue at this time. u The Commission asked if these ball fields would compete with the City parks. Mr. Carlberg didn't believe so, as there is a shortage of ball fields in the City. This is a controlled league environment and a private endeavor which will not compete with the other athletic activities in the City. He then provided a copy of the site plan of the proposal for the Commission to view. The fencing will be reviewed as a part of the commercial site plan. Commissioner Dehn asked how many times per month on the average would this facility require police calls. How many times do the police have to respond at the White Bear Lake facility? With the City contracting with Anoka County for police protection, she was concerned with overstressing the existing police force and jeopardizing the current police service. ,c\ '---../ Brad Povlitzki - stated some Councilmembers were apprehensive about the proposal until they visited Village Inn in White Bear Lake. It is a fabulous place to eat and to watch games. He did not know the police demands at Village Inn, but they rarely have to call the police at their place in Spring Lake Park. Many of the calls are domestic over which they have no control. Mr. Carlberg stated the City pays for the number of hours of police coverage, not for the number of calls to which the Deputies respond. He had no way of knowing whether this will require the City to increase the amount of police protection in the City, but the cost of the liquor license is $3,500, plus $500 for the background check, plus annual renewal, which should cover some of the additional police coverage if needed. lJ u ~ Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 Page 6 (Public Hearing: Special Use Permit/Liquor License/povlitzki, Continued) Richard Povlitzki - added plus their taxes are high because there will be a lot of revenue coming in. Mr. Olson - was concerned with having a bar in Andover, especially near where he lives. He stated a bar is not needed out here. Mr. Carlberg stated there are no restaurant/bar facilities in the City of Andover. o Mr. Olson - stated it would take very little to cross the wetland. He predicted there would be a road coming back there connecting with 139th Avenue. With all the small children in the neighborhood, that would be a problem. He never saw a family atmosphere in a bar, that people do not bring their children to a bar. He has been to Povlitzki's bar in Spring Lake Park and enjoyed it; but putting such a building 500 feet from the residential area creates a noise factor. He does not want to listen to people yelling and screaming until 10: 30 every night and people racing down Bunker Lake Boulevard at 1 o'clock when they leave the place, especially since they just got the motor bikes out of there. He suggested the Commission talk to the people at Spring Lake Park, the police and the City Council, to see what kind of atmosphere there is at that establishment. He stated this is not a business district here. Mr. Carlberg disputed the last statement, as the area is zoned General Business, with an industrial area to the south and Anoka Auto Wrecking to the east. The only portion that is not commercial is to the northwest, which is about 700 feet from the location of this proposed facility. Chairperson Squires noted there has to be a line where the residential area ends and the commercial district backs up to it. However, in this case, he is hearing that there are no plans to put the proposed use anywhere near the residential district. In response to questions from the Commission, the Povlitzki's stated they will serve food throughout the entire place. The seating capacity would be between 196 and 226, and they hope to generate up to 400 customers per day. :~) Bill Hupp, 13-vear resident on Andover Boulevard - stated his parents owned a bar, so he comes from a bar background and grew up in that atmosphere. He was concerned with the kind of clientele that this facility would bring to Andover. There are some very nice homes in the vicinity, the Hills of Bunker Lake and around his neighborhood. The sports oriented clientele is generally the younger, more aggressive cliental that can create a lot of problems and may not be desirable. It could create a situation for increased incidents of disobedience, vandalism, etc. He is not opposed to liquor as long as it is handled properly. While it is nice to have the additional business and revenue for the City, it is also nice to have something conducive for the entire community; and he cautioned the Commission to be careful in that respect. Bloomington has an ordinance that regulates the amount of food service that must be maintained throughout the year so they are not catering to the two-for-one promotions for drinks which encourages the clientele to get drunk. \ '- ) ~-) Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 '.) Page 7 (Public Hearing: Special Use permit/Liquor License/Povlitzki, Continued) Mr. Hupp questioned the draw of families to facilities that have ball fields as its draw, that people are not going to bring their children to that type of establishment. He noted the City has many ball parks and expressed concern with the noise factor. He was opposed to the scenario of 500 people at the ball fields with a two-for-one drink promotion. Again, he cautioned not to act too quickly, that it is not in the community's best interest to draw a lot of kids from different areas. He thought food service should be the top priority to have a real nice restaurant. What does the community want? Richard Povlitzki - is familiar with Mr. Hupp's family establishments which do not sell foodr and refuted their business ability, alleging they do not know how to run a bar. '1 ,~_/ ~rad ~ovlitzki - stated ~he ,Hupp'S run a 9l-~.tm;',E(Rt..,:t;:~~ of bar t~an what ~s be~ng proposed. Comm~ss~oner Jovanov~Ch~sEated ln ~er exper~ence as a waitress, she has seen a difference in the attitude of clientele of the sports enthusiasts versus a family atmosphere. The language and attitude changes with the sports enthusiasts, and families do not want to be around them. Mr. Carlberg explained the City can establish conditions when issuing the Special Use Permit; and if those conditions are not being followed, there is a process to revoke the Permit. He again noted the facility itself is a permitted use and is not a part of the consideration this evening, only the Permit for the liquor license. He is hearing tonight that management is the whole key to the operation of the facility. If it is run like the Village Inn restaur~nt/bar in White Bear Lake, there should be no problem. If it is run Like the SRO in Oak Grove, that probably is not what Andover wants. That is why the City has the ability to establish conditions on the Permit. There are ordinances to deal with noise, etc., to protect the residents as much as possible. Commissioner Dehn asked if the applicant would consider a playground area for the children in the fenced area. Brad Povlitzki - didn' t think so. He is providing a restaurant for them. Otherwise, it is a bar facility. He doesn't babysit the children; parents will have to take care of them. Mr. Olson - was concerned with the noise, asking about bands an~ concerts. C.O\'Y\Y\'\I~S\Oner- jO\Jo..nCNiCh o..\~ q,,\Je~O'\ed -+neQ...W\Curyro-f' noise ()..r\() Whe.oU-\.ev- ~e.re. WI 1\ 1Oe.. bO-v\OS Q..v\.d C-ovu:er+s . Richard Povlitzki - stated most cities require a Special Use Permit to have concerts. They would even need permits to have special signs. Brad Povlitzki - hasn't decided about live entertainment. There might be some at some time in the future. Right now he will be promoting the softball, hoping to build up the clientele. Some places do play softball in the winter. J '- / Richard Povlitzki - does not intend to put in a dance floor from the start; but they are investing $1.5 million and will need to do something to make it successful. , \ \_j ~.J , \ , .J Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 Page 8 (Public Hearing: Special Use PermitjLiquorLicensejPovlitzki, Continued) Mr. Olson - stated they are talking about 400 customers. If this is approved, he alleged the people of Andover will know each of the Commissioners by name. They came out to Andover to raise their children, not to live next to a bar. Richard Povlitzki - stated they will keep all of the woods they can as a screen. MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2-Absent (Apel, Pease) vote. 8:22 p.m. Commissioner Peek was concerned with the location of the facility. The other two liquor license requests in the past were located totally separate from the residential area. He did not think it was appropriate for the entire site to be developed. The only way he could support this is to add stipulations and conditions as a part of the Special Use Permit to limit the development to the southeast quadrant of the site and put limitations on the development in the northwest corner to safeguard against disturbing the residents. There is a natural feature that functions as a buffer, and he would like to see that maintained. \ It is difficult to mandate the type of management or the type of ,-j operation in a Permit, but he wants to make sure the conditions are the sale of liquor would be inside the building and that no kegs would be allowed on the softball fields. The area of service should be mandated and controlled. Commissioner Jovanovich was concerned with how the liquor license would affect the police department. Commissioner Dehn agreed with Commissioner peekr especially on noise regulations and the buffering of the residential area. Even though there is a large tree and vegetative area there, she is still concerned with the residential area. She would probably agree with limiting to the southeast quadrant; but her greatest concern is the traff ic on Bunker Lake Boulevard. There is a lot of traffic and speeding there now; and adding another 400 to 500 cars daily to that area that does not have a signal is a great cause of concern. She would be more at ease if the intersection was signalized. Commissioner Putnam also agreed the Permit should be limited to the southeast quarter of the parcel and that the buffer to the residential area should be maintained. He too was concerned with the traffic on Bunker Lake Boulevard, noting there is no guarantee when the county will upgrade it to four lanes. Finally, he questioned the added load on the police force that this establishment may bring. He likened this to BeeBop in Blaine, which has an atmosphere of a place to take the children and which he found acceptable \ , ) Chairperson Squires stated there is a consensus problems, and the issue is whether those are reasons conditions and contingencies be added to the recommendation for approval. In further Commission suggested the applicant look at a PUD or subdivision on the potential for denial or can Permit with the discussion, it was of the property or f \ \_) C.J ~j Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 Page 9 (Public Hearing: Special Use Permit/Liquor License/povlitzki, Continued) that the item be tabled to allow Staff and the applicant to look at subdivision and/or writing conditions into the Permit. Mr. Carlberg noted subdivision would take a number of months, and the request is not for a subdivision but for a Special Use Permit for a liquor license. A contingency can be added that with any future subdivision, the liquor license would stay with the restaurant/bar facility only. Richard Povlitzki - stated the option on the purchase agreement runs out in 10 to 15 days. In addressing the traffic concerns, Mr. Carlberg noted no Permit has ever been denied based on traffic. This is a commercial use in a commercial area, and commercial traffic will be generated on that road. It is anticipated that improvements will be needed on Bunker Lake Boulevard in the future. Chairperson Squires noted this will mean everybody spilling out on Bunker Lake Boulevard at 1 a.m. every day, but a different use would have more metered traffic. Mavor Jack McKelvev addressed some of the concerns of the Commissioners. In visiting the Village Inn establishment two times, he had an opportunity to talk with the owner and the manager. That business has only one ball field, with the fence backing right up to the residential area. They do not have any problems with their neighbors. ,-, It is a very nice place and managed totally different than the SRO. In ~/ this instance the nearest resident is over 700 feet away. In the other two instances when liquor licenses were being considered, the residential area was considerably closer than in this case. Right now the police respond to an average of 4 1/2 calls per shift. When he was a policeman in Minneapolis, they averaged 26 calls per shift. He did not consider Andover's deputies overworked, and he didn't think this will overstress the law enforcement. Mayor McKelvey went on that the City of Oak Grove is about to pull the license from the SRO because they allow people to carry alcohol to the fields, plus they are running the games and leaving the lights on past 10:30 p.m. The Council does have the control to pull the Permit if there are violations to it. Mr. Olson - asked questions about where the Mayor lived and worked, expressing great frustration over the items brought up by the Mayor. Mavor McKelvev - was of the opinion that the residents of Andover would like to see a nice bar in the City. In addition, with the construction of Commercial Boulevard and the future Jay Street, the traffic will be pulled away from Bunker Lake Boulevard. The bus traffic, specifically, will access to the south once Commercial Boulevard is completed. And he didn't think there was any other place in the City where it would be further away from the residential area. ~) The Commission continued to deliberate on whether they can adequately write the contingencies to the Permit and recommend approval this evening or whether it should be tabled for Staff to meet with the applicant and recommend those contingencies based on the discussions this evening. Several Commissions appreciated the Mayor's response to the law enforcement question and were no longer as concerned about that issue. f \ , , '- ' , ) \ , '-' \ \ ) Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 24, 1994 Page 10 (Public Hearing: Special Use Permit/Liquor License/povlitzki, Continued) Mr. Carlberg stated if the Commission wishes to limit the Permit to the southeast quadrant, he would write the legal description prior to the City Council hearing the request. That won't prevent them for adding another ballfield or two, because that is a permitted use; but it would eliminate liquor from any other area of the parcel. He too noted if the applicant could acquire only the portion of the acreage needed for this facility, the residential property would not have been notified because it would be beyond the distance needed for notification. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Putnam, to forward the attached Resolution to the City Council and recommend for approval with the following conditions: Number 1 and 2 to stay as is. Add Number 3, which would be the Special Use Permit for on-sale liquor shall be limited to the southeast quadrant of the site based on legal description developed by Staff to be presented to the City Council. Number 4, liquor sales and consumption shall be limited to the building interior and deck; Number 5, Special Use Permit is contingent on application and obtaining liquor license. , VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Peek, Putnam, Squires; NO-Dehn, Jovanovich; ABSENT: Apel, Pease. Motion carried. Commissioner Dehn was still concerned with the traffic issue. Commissioner Jovanovich still had concerns with the police and traffic issues. This will be placed on the June 7, 1994, City Council agenda. 8:51 p.m. OTHER BUSINESS Home Occupation Ordinance - Mr. Carlberg reported the City Council's agreement with the Commission's concern that the City is going beyond the intent of repair services and similar uses when allowing the small manufacturing businesses of making garage doors, woodworking, etc. They recommended the Commission scale back and look at home occupations in accessory buildings as specifically defined in the ordinance. They may have to look at the ordinance and clarify it more; but those Permits already approved would not be revoked. He will have legal counsel determine the process so the City doesn't jeopardize its standing on this matter. MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Putnam, to adjourn. Motion carried on a 5- Yes, 2-Absent (Apel, Pease) vote. The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. '0) Respectfully submitted, \{Y\u;~~L '~a~ella A. Peach, Recording Secretary