HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 25, 1997
Q
u
,,"-
u
o
u
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda
March 25, 1997
Oak View Middle School
7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes - March 11,1997
3. Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan AmendmentJLand Use
Plan/District - Remove OS* (Open Space/PUD) designation, redesignate
RM (Residential Medium Density) and designate area RU (Residential -
Urban Single Family) - Sections 22 & 23.
4. Public Hearing: Rezoning (REZ 97-04) - R-I, Single Family Rural to
a Comprehensive PlanlLand Use Plan Designation ofOS* (Open
Space/PUD) - Section 23 (NE Y4 ofNW Y4)- Ashford Development
Corporation.
5. Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (SUP 97-05) - Real Estate Sign-
Hunter's Hollow (Lot 1, Block 1) - Gold Nugget Development
Corporation.
6. Sketch Plan - Hamilton Property - Section 23 - Ed and Laura Hamilton.
7. Sketch Plan - Andover CommerciallIndustrial Park - Section 34 - City of
Andover.
8. Ordinance Review:
Ordinance No. 32, Public Sanitary Sewer Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 33, Parking on City Streets.
Ordinance No. 34, Noxious Weeds Ordinance.
Ordinap.ce No. 35, Requiring Licenses, Permits and Establishing
Fees for Excavators.
9. Other Business
10. Adjournment
,
\,
u
u
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - MARCH 25, 1997
MINUTES
The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission was called to order by Chairperson Randy Peek on March 25,
1997, 7:00 p.m. at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Boulevard
NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Commissioners present:
Commissioners absent:
Also present:
Maynard Apel, Mike Gamache, Jay Squires
Lynette Barry, Jeff Luedtke, Lorna Wells
City Planning, John Hinzman
City Planning, Jeff Johnson
Community Development Director, Dave Carlberg
Others
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
March 11, 1997: Page 6, Other Business, first paragraph, clarify that
the uses proposed for the site would require a rezoning.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Squires, to approve the Minutes as changed
by Mr. Carlberg. Motion carried on a 3-Yes, I-Present (Squires), 3-
Absent (Barry, Luedtke, \'I'el18) vote.
o
PUBLIC HE.r;RING: COMPREHENSIVE PL.W AMEND!.JENT/LAND USE PLAN/DISTRICT _
REMOVE OS, OPEN SPACE/PUD DESIGNATION, REDESIGNATE RU, RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM DENSITY AND DESIGNATE AREA RU, RESIDENTIAL URBAl-1 SINGLE FAMILY _
SECTIONS 22 AND 23
7:02 p.m. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
relating to the Chesterton Commons subdivision and the recently adopted
Metropolitan Urban Service Area expansions which do not conform with the
Comprehensive Plan. The Council has directed Staff to submit an
amendment changing the OS and RM designations on the proposed Chesterton
Commons subdivision to RU. In exchange for the elimination of the RM
designation on Chesterton Commons, the land use district of a GO-acre
parcel owned by Ashford Development north of Oak View Middle School
would be changed from RR, Residential Rural to RM. Most of the land is
within the 1995-2000 MUSA expansion area.
()
Mr. Hinzman stated in preparir;g the amendment, Staff noticed a number of
other areas that have been adopted as a part of the MUSA, generally
located in the southwestern portion of the City, which are designated
for rural uses in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is asking for direction
as to whether to attach amendments to change those land uses along with
this Chesterton Commons amendment. Staff has also been having
conversations with Kenco Development regarding the development of a 20+-
acre strip between the middle school and the proposed RM designated area
owned by Ashford Development. Kenco is indicating an interest in
designating that area RM as well! which would coincide with the proposed
land use to the north. That was not included in the amendment before
the Commission tonight, but Kenco Development would like it included.
/ ,
'-
, j
,
.0
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - March 25, 1997
.' " Page 2
" /
(Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Land Use Plan - Sections
22 and 23, Continued)
Commissioner Squires asked about the public hearing notification. Mr.
Carlberg stated the properties in the southwestern portion of the City
and that 20+-acre strip requested by Kenco were not included in the
public hearing notice. He would have to research whether the public
hearing notice is required to be site specific.
MOTION by Carlberg, Seconded by Gamache, to open the public hearing.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Barry, Luedtke, Wells) vote. 7:10
p.m.
Mr. Hinzman stated the agenda material states the RM designation for the
Ashford Development property would be designated exclusively for senior
citizen housing. In talking with Mr. Windschitl this afternoon, Staff
is recommending that exclusion not be a part of the land use amendment.
Also, the calculations for sewer flow for these areas when the
Comprehensive Plan amendment for the MUSA was prepared last year was for
urban development. It is expected this change will make those numbers
significantly lower, so a correction needs to be made to Number 1 on
Page A75. Mr. Carlberg st::>.ted they will need to consult with TKDA to
determine how many units per acre were used for the MUSA amendment. He
also stated the exclusion for senior housing on the newly designated RM
) land was not the directive of the Council.
Je~Windschitl, As.hford Development - stated adding the exclusion to
the amendment presents legal difficulties for him on the zoning, putting
him in a position where he might not be in compliance with state or
federal law.
Don Jenson, representin~nco Development - presented a conceptual land
use for the 21.25-acre parcel between the middle school and that owned
by Ashford Development which is proposed for RM development. They feel
it would be a reasonable transition between the school and Ashford's
property to have medium density development, especially for that portion
which immediately abuts the school property. There is wetland 1,100 to
1,200 feet back from the road. Now they are proposing twin homes on the
front half for a density of 4 1/2 to 5 units per acre and 25 to 28
single family lots to the rear, for a total density of 3.29 units per
acre. Mr. Carlberg stated at present the Comprehensive Plan land use
designation is RR, though Kenco could develop as proposed under a PUD.
Mr. Windschitl - was concerned with Page 2, Item 4 on the Resolution.
His preference would be to eliminate those descriptions because there
may be confusion as to why they are there. Those are divorced from the
proposal itself and could have the effect of slowing down the process of
amendment approval.
In discussing the inclusion of other areas into this amendment, the
/ Commission felt that this amendment should be related to the Chesterton
Commons subdivision only and handle the other areas separate with
another public hearing notification. Items 4, 5 and 6 would then be
stricken from the Resolution.
j
"J
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - March 25, 1997
, Page 3
/
(Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Land Use Plan - Sections
22 and 23, Continued)
MOTION by Gamache, Seconded by Squires, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Barry, Luedtke, Wells) vote. 7:28
p.m.
Mr. Jenson stated there is a clear boundary between where the RM and RU
land use would be designated on their parcel. It is a question of
whether the Commission would want to include it in this amendment. Mr.
Carlberg stated Staff has not had an opportunity to look at the
proposals and did not know if there was some partnership between Kenco
and Ashford Development. Mr. Jenson stated they are just looking at
options.
Mr. Windschitl explained they are doing market research for a senior
citizen campus on the entire 60-acre parcel. There are some very nice
amenities on the site they may be able to incorporate into the
development. They are looking at such things as providing garden plots
into the complex. They are not looking at any acute care facilities on
the site. Once their market research is finished, they will present a
mock up to scale ahead of the sketch plan for the City's reaction.
While the Commission felt it made sense to have higher density
/ development as a transition immediately north of the school and single
family urban to the west on the Kenco site, they suggested the
developers \wrk with Staff and that a separate application aEd amendment
be prepared for tLe land use in the Comprehensive Plan.
MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Apel, that the Commission recommend to
the City Council the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to designate
the parcels attached and incorporated in the attached Resolution with
Items 4 through 6 eliminated. Motion carried on a 4-.Yes, 3-Absent
(Barry, Luedtke, Wells) vote. Hr. Carlberg also noted the sewer flows
will be adjusted based on this evening's discussion. The Commission
agreed. This will be placed on the April 1 City Council agenda. 7:33
p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING - R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO A COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN/LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION OF OS - SECTION 23 - ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
MOTION by Apel,
recommendation.
Wells) vote.
Seconded by Gamache, to table the item pursuant to Staff
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Barry, Luedtke,
PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - RE.Zl.L ESTATE SIGN - HUNTER'S HOLLOW
, / (LOT 1, BLOCK 1) - GOLD NUGGET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
7:34 p.m. Mr. Johnson reviewed the Special Use Permit request of Gold
Nugget Development CO"1pany to Erect a real estate sign at 3179 166th
'- j
,
'-, )
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - March 25, .1997
'\ Page 4
/
(Public Hearing:
Hollow, Continued)
Lane NW. He noted the applicable ordinances and
considered. The sign will be used to promote the
Hunter's Hollow. Staff is recommending approval with
Special
Use Permi t
- Real Estate Sign
- Hunter's
cri teria to
sale of lots
conditions.
be
in
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Gamache, to open the public hearing. Motion
carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Barry, Luedtke, Wells) vote. There was no
public testimony.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Squires, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Barry, Luedtke, Wells) vote. 7:42
p.m.
1-!OTIOll by Apel, Seconded by Gamache, to forward to the City Council wi th
the recommendation for approval the Resolution granting a Special Use
Permit request of Gold Nugget Development Company for a real estate sign
as presented by Staff. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Barry,
Luedtke, Wells) vote. 7:44 p.m.
SKETCH PLAN - HM!ILTON PROPERTY - SECTION 23 - ED AND LORA HAMILTON
Hr. Carlberg reviewed the proposed sketch plan of Hamil ton Square
)
located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard
and Crosstown Boulevard in Section 23. The plan consists of four
commercial lots in a Shopping Center District. It is in consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area. The endangered plant species of Tall Nut Rush may exist on the
site which may need to be protected per State Statute. The Andover
Review Committee made several comments regarding utilities, street names
and design and various plans to be followed. They also noted a
bi tuminous bilreway /walkway will be required along both Hanson and
Crosstown Boulevards. Anoka County would like to see each street access
to the property be as far away from the intersection of Hanson and
Crosstown Boulevards as possible. At present a US postal service
distribution center and a medical clinic are considering locating on
this site.
Chairperson Peek asked if the road construction of Crosstown Boulevard
is suitable to construction traffic. Mr. Carlberg stated yes, it is a
county road. Commissioner Squires inquired about the access onto Hanson
Boulevard and any future consideration of an access to the City Hall
site. If there are plans, the intersection should align with the one
coming from this develompent. Mr. Carlberg explained the only access
from Hanson Boulevard to the City Hall site is for a small parking lot
by the ball fields. There are no plans to provide any other accesses to
the City Hall site off Hanson Boulevard in the future.
) The Commission generally agreed with the plan as proposed. Staff noted
this will be on the April I, 1997, City Council agenda.
.I
J
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - March 25, 1997
Page 5
/
SKETCH PLAN - ANDOVER COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK - SECTION 34 - CITY OF
ANDOVER
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the sketch plan for the commercial/industrial
development of approximately 90 acres south of Bunker Lake Boulevard by
the City of Andover. The property is currently zoned I, Industrial; and
the proposal is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. He noted
the frontage road, street layout and lot layout. Commercial Boulevard
is the buffer between the residential properties to the south and the
industrial area. More commercial-type businesses would be developed to
the north along Bunker Lake Boulevard with industrial-type businesses
located to the south closer to Commercial Boulevard. The businesses
along the frontage road would probably face Bunker Lake Boulevard, but
access would be from the frontage road. The frontage road has been laid
out to avoid the wetlands per the directive of the Coon Creek Watershed
Board. The lots range in size from one acre to eight acres. For
flexibility, the thought is it would be easier to combine two parcels
into one larger one than it is to split a larger parcel into smaller
ones. A sidewalk and bituminous trail system is also being proposed
throughout the development where residents and people working in the
complex can enjoy the natural areas. No market research has been done
for this area, though Staff will be contacting some commercial
developers through this process to get ideas. This sketch plan has been
\ done by Staff and is subject to change as warranted by further research.
/ The City is still exploring options on the development of the site
itself, covenants, etc.
Chairperson Peek understood the t:hought behind the expanding versus
shrinking of parcel Sl zes, though he is not convinced the proposed
pattern provides tbe most flexibility. He would not favor many small
commercial enterprises along the front of Bunker Lake Boulevard. Much
of that has to do with the development itself and what the market is.
He did favor the::::oncept.
Commissioner Squires strongly supported the commercial and industrial
designation. The redevelopment of this area is one of the best things
the City has done. The City needs a quality service entertainment
establishment. The idea of high quality restaurants and offices along
Bunker Lake Boulevard provides a good buffer to the industrial property
to the south. He'd like to see really nice quality service
establishments along there.
Jerrv Windschitl - scated it is good to see this redevelopment. He
suggested that the setbacks for the lots be plotted, especially on the
four lots on the north, to be sure the remaining window is large enough
for businesses. There is not a lot of room left on those parcels once
the setbacks, parking requirements, etc., are accounted for. Mr.
Carlberg stated that is a good point. Staff should do a development
window on each lot to make sure they know what type of structure can be
) put on each.
The Commission had no further comments.
" '\
-'- /
,
)
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - March 25, 1997
'\ Page 6
/
ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 32, PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER
Mr. Johnson stated the Engineers and Public Works Department are
reviewing this ordinance. The last update was in 1986, and several
changes are needed. He will bring those recommended changes back.
ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 33, PARKING ON CITY STREETS
Mr. Johnson stated this ordinance will be rewritten into the new format.
No changes are being proposed by Staff. Mr. Carlberg noted the Council
will hold a public hearing regarding the parking of boats and trailers
at the Crooked Lake Elementary school because of the concern with
overuse of Crooked Lake. Some change to the ordinance may come about as
a result of that hearing. The Commission noted consideration for no
parking should also then be given along Bunker Lake Boulevard, the
frontage ~oad and City streets for some distance from the lake.
ORDINANCE REVIEr'/ - ORDINANCE NO. 34, NOXIOUS '&'lEEDS ORDINANCE
Mr. Johnson stated the ordinance will be renumbered. The last update
was in 1976, but the concept will remain the same. He has received
ordin2nces from other cOlL.munities to review, and Andover's ordinance is
\ in line with theirs.
)
ORDINA...VCE REVIEW - Orm:rNi!NCE 1VO. 35, REQUIRING LICENSBS,. PERMITS .l!ND
ESTABLISHING FEES FOR EXCAVATORS
Mr. Johnson stated no maj or changes are proposed by the Bui Iding
Official. Commissioner Squires stated the insurance needed for licenses
should be reviewed, as the limits set in 1976 may no longer be
reasonable. To some extent those limits were tied to municipal
liability tort limits, which will probably be changed by the State.
ORDINARCE 92, ADULT USES
Mr. Johnson reported the City Council has asked that Ordinance 92, Adult
Uses, be updated and strengthened. Staff has received a request for an
adult novelty business in Andover. Those revisions will be going
directly to the City Council for consideration.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the actions taken by the City Council at their
March 18, 1997, meeting.
, MOTION by Squires, Seconded
/ a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Barry,
adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
'\\f~espectl+#~~i, t5,e<>~'
\\ CL--W~~ l.~ '\ I'CJo-<../
Ma cella A. Peach, Recor ing
by Gamache, to adjourn.
Luedtke, Wells) vote.
Motion carried on
The meeting was
Secretary