Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd. 019 - Minnesota State Building Code File data, memos, etc. ~ November 21, 1988 Ord. 19, Section 2A, 2, Referral of Application by Inspector in Certain Cases: whenever an application is filed with the City for a building permit for any structure to be: built enlarged or altered within, or moved into the City, the Building Official shall review such application and accompanying documents to determine whether the exterior architectural design appearance or functional plan of such proposed structure, when erected will be so at variance with or so similar to the exterior architectural design of any structure or structures already constructed or in the course of construction which is within 300 feet of the lot upon which the structure is located, or so at variance with the character of the applicable district as established by the zoning ordinance of the City as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values of the neighborhood. The 300 foot restriction shall be determined by measurement along the street upon which the structure fronts. If the Building Inspector finds that the exterior architectural design of the proposed structure, when erected, may bed so at variance with, or so similar to the architectural design appearance or functional plan of structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the neighborhood, no building permit therefor shall be issued and the Building Official shall within 10 days after receipt of the application of the building permit application and supporting documents, file the same and such opinion in writing, signed by the Building Official, with the Secretary of the Board of Design Control, which shall review the determination of the Building Official. ~ Building Code 1985 Edition. The Code shall be enforced within the incorporated limits of the City, and extraterritorial limits permitted by Minnesota Statutes, 1984. The Building Department shall be the Building Code Department of the City of Andover. The Administrative Authority shall be a state Certified "Building Official". SECTION 2A. 1. Architectural Design, Exterior Facing The application for a building permit, in addition to other information required by applicable laws or regulations, shall include exterior elevations of the proposed structure and drawings which will adequately and accurately indicate the height, size, design, and appearance of all elevations of the proposed structure and a description of the construction and materials proposed to be used. 2. Referral of Application by Inspector in Certain Cases Whenever an application is filed with the City for a building permit for any structure to be built, enlarged, or altered within, or moved into the City, the Building Official shall review such application and accompanying documents to determine whether the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of such proposed structure, when erected will be so at variance with, or so similar to the exterior architectural design of any structure or structures already constructed or in the course of construction which is within three hundred (300') feet of the lot ~on which the structure is located, or so at variance with the Character of the applicable district as established by the zoning ordinance of the City as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values of the neighborhood. The three hundred (300') foot restriction shall be determined by measurement along the street upon which the structure fronts. (19K, 11-15-88) If the Building Official finds that the exterior architectural design of the proposed structure, when erected, may be so at variance with, or so similar to, the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the neighborhood, no building permit therefor shall be issued and the Building Official shall within ten (10) days after receipt of the application of the building permit application and supporting documents, file the same and such opinion in writing, signed by the Building Official, with the Secretary of the Board of Design Control, which shall review the determination of the Building Official. (19J, 3-15-88) 3. Board of Design Control Created The Andover Review Committee of the City of Andover shall be and is hereby appointed as the Board of Design Control. The Board shall review all building permit applications referred to it by the Building Official upon his determination that the exterior architectural design of the proposed structure would violate the provisions of this ordinance. The Andover Review Committee shall act upon all applications or other matters referred to it within twenty (20) days from the date such application was originally filed with the Building Official. It may approve, conditionally Page 2 " C-f(!L.77-;'//)t!.-V / 'I' '--------7 2. Referral of Application by Inspector in Certain Cases: Whenever an application is filed with the City for a building permit for any structure to be built, enlarged, or altered within, or moved into the City, the Building Official shall review such application and accompanying documents to determine whether the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of such proposed structure, when erected will be so at variance with, or so similar to the exterior architectural design of any structure or structures already constructed or in the course of construction which is within three hundred (300't feet of the lot upon which the structure is located. The three hundred (300') foot restriction shall be determined by measurement along the street upon which the structure fronts, or so at variance with the character of the applicable district as established by the zoning ordinance of the City as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values of the neighborhood. If the Building Official finds that the exterior' architectural design of the proposed structure, when erected, may be so at variance with, or so similar to, the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of structures already constructed or in the course of construction within the area delineated above, no building permit therefor shall be issued and the Building Official shall within ten (10) days after receipt of the application of the building permit application and supporting documents, file the same and such. opinion in writing, signed by the Building Of~icial, ~th the Secretary of the Board of Design Control, which shall review the determination of the Building Official (19J, 3-15-881 19K, 11-15-881 ,6;/ c--, / IJIJ dot.f~tf /;:rd.JJ.' dUlk td:It..u- , ''l.. ?I/Cfc; (:, CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NO. 19J AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 191, ADOPTED THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 1988. The city Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain: Ordinance No. 191 is hereby amended as follows: Section 2A 2. Referral of Application by Inspector in Certain Cases Whenever an application is filed with the City for a building permit for any structure to be built, enlarged, or altered within, or moved into the city, the Building Official shall review such application and accompanying documents to determine whether the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of such proposed structure, when erected, will be so at variance with, or so similar to the exterior architectural design of any structure or structures already constructed or in the course of cons ructio in-~he-immedia~e-neig~:d . Adopted by the City coun~v~ this of March l{;Cu;J 1.# Victoria Volk - City Clerk ~. ( lh ':po . . ~ J~~;t? .~~. \\ " ~~~~~l:\r.1\_~ f(i\"~" 'r\) \,. ,(!~ """""'21'" CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 15, 1988 MINUTES The Regular to order by the Andover Minnesota. Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called Mayor Jerry Windschitl on November 15, 1988, 7:30 p.m.; at City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Councilmen present: Councilman absent: Also present: Apel, Elling, Knight, Orttel None City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; TKDA Engineer, John Rodeberg; Assistant City Engineer, Todd Haas; City Planner, Jay Blake; City Administrator, James Schrantz; and others RESIDENT FORUM Jerry Green and Tony Emmerich. developers of Hills of Bunker Lake - explained in their development two different polices are being used for street lighting, which causes neighbors to be paying two different amounts. They thought they had an agreement with Anoka Eiectric in July, 1987, for the entIre development where Anoka Electric would finance, install and maintain the lights, and bil i the City. The City would then bill the residents along with the sewer and water charges. It was done iike that in Phases 1 and 2; however, in Phase 3 they were told the policy had changed, which in turn causes a different rate to be charged the residents. They have a problem with that, asking the Council to address it. The Council explained that Anoka Electric is now considering its third policy change since their original agreement. This policy will be addressed by the AEC Board on November 17. Under this policy, the developer would pay for the installation, and the energy costs would be billed to the City and passed on to the property owners. After discussing the situation further with Mr. Green and Mr. Emmerich, it was agreed to wait until after the November 17 AEC Board meeting to see what is done with the policy being proposed by their Staff. If Mr. Green and Mr. Emmerich still want to stay with the first option for the remainder of the Hills of Bunker Lake development, the Council agreed to help plead their case. ~ l(c/ , ) q Al Hammel. Oak Bluff Addition - explained the Council amended the ordinance last March which prohibits like dwellings within a 300-foot radius of each other. Using a map of the development, he showed the large impact the radius requirement has. He stated he would have no problem if it was 300 feet of street frontage, but a 300-foot radius could mean as much as 700 or 800 feet of street frontage apart, feeling that is excessive. Council discussion recalled the intent was to prohibit like dwellings within 300 feet of street frontage, not radius. It was agreed to add this item to the Agenda. Regular City Council Meeting November 15, 1988 - Minutes Page 4 RESCIND MOTION ON COUNCIL APPOINTMENT MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Apel, to rescind the motion made at the last meeting on the Council appointment. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we initiate advertising for the future vacancy on the Council seat and note that we close that the last week in December with an eye toward selecting shortly after the first of the year. Motion carried unanimously. HIRE CY SMYTHE TO REVIEW LABOR CONTRACT MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that Mr. Cy Symthe be contracted to review the labor contract after receiving a proposal for the estimated cost of the reviewal. MotIon carried unanimously. ORDINANCE 19 CHANGE - HAMMEL Attorney Hawkins recommended the following change to Ordinance 19J at the end of SectIon 2a: "...which is within 300 feet of the lot upon which the structure is located. The 300-foot restriction shall be determined by measurement along the street upon which the structure fronts." MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Apel, introducing that as Ordinance 19K, an ordinance amending Ordinance 19J. Motion carried unanimously. EXTENSION OF VACATION - SCHRANTZ Mayor Windschitl explained Mr. Schrantz needs authorization to carry two days of vacation into December. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Apel, to so move. Motion carried unanimously. UPDATE ON HAZARDOUS WASTE - CONSTANCE BOULEVARD Mr. Schrantz explaIned all the hazardous waste barrels have been removed from the property at 155 Constance Boulevard and is being housed at the county shop untIl it can be moved out of town. One person has been charged with 16 felony counts for falsifying records on the transport of hazardous waste. There were 400 barrels, plus a tank ,and a truck fIlled with solvents. They do not believe anything was dumped on the ground, so there shouldn't be any pollution. Andover Planning and Zoning Commission July 1~, 1988 Page Five Commission has looked at the site plan and proposal and finds in its recommendation that because the home does not 'actually sit on the bank of the Rum, but on a back water that the variance of 22 feet would not be contrary to the full intent of the ordinance to protect the Rum River and the visual sightings from the visual level and would recommend that the variance be granted to allow the landowner the best use of the property which has physical limitations due to elevations and low spots. The Commission finds that the Plan presented to them at the meeting is the best use of the property including the variance. This variance will be subject to the final approval of the DNR. All the commissioners voted yes. Motion carried. This item will also go to the City Council on August 2nd. HILLS OF BUNKER - (NONAGENDA ITEM) Several residents of the Hills of Bunker wanted to convey their concern that many of the houses being built in their development are all looking very much the same, with a minor change in roof pitch. Chairman Perry stated there is already an ordinance addressing this subject and recommended that the residents bring their concern to the City Council during the Residents Form section of the meeting. The Commission recessed at 9:10 and resumed the regular Andover Planning Commission meeting at 9:20. NON-DOMESTICATED ANIMAL ORDINANCE. PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Vistad had an objection to the wording in Section 2 (d) about crossbreeding and felt the sentence should be omitted completery. Mr. Jacobson indicated his feeling that the word "wild" should be stricken from Section 1 - Definitions. Also, it was asked that the words be added to Section 5 end of the first sentence, "may be destroyed or sold, or otherwise disposed of." Commissioner Bernard had a question on Section 6 and was wondering if someone had a wild animal for a long time, would the City force them to get rid of it within 90 days. Mr. Bernard felt this would be unfair to someone who had a wild animal for many years. ?~ 0& ANDOVER Request For Plannin~J Commission Action ^ndove r Rev i ew ConTII i t lee Ily Daryl D. Morey 'DDM i\Pl>fOVcd By, 1.1.:,:1"'9 O.1te' March 8, 1988 rl,;,go P. M. Case: ,;J 8. Ordinance 19 Amendment Discussion Loca lion: Applicant: City of Andover Attachnlenls: Ordinance 19 Amendment, City Council Minutes Reques t: U On February 2, 1988, the City Council approved a similar house amendment to Ordinance 19. This amendment was prepared by the City Attorney.and placed on the Coum::U' agenda 'before'being' . .. reviewed by the Planning Commission. '~ , Planning and Zoning Commission March 8, 1988, Meeting Minutes Page 9 Ms. Bosell informed the developer that in regard to the grading and filling, clear cutting, and the vegetative process, it is very restrictive because it is protected water. She stated that permits must be obtained through the city. Anything that is within the 1,000 feet of the lake is wi thin the jurisdiction of the city. Ms. Bosell recommended that the applicant get a copy of Ordinance 71 from city staff for his information. The plat needs to be sent to the Department of Natural Resources. Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Pease, to close the public hearing. All voted yes. Motion carried. .J Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Bernard, that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the Andover City Council approvai of a preliminary plat known as Brandon Lakeview Estates, approximately 6.99 acres at the intersection of l44th Ave. N.W. and Round Lake Blvd. with the following notations and variances: 1) recommendation of variance requested on Lot 1, Block 1 to make the minimum front setback line 45 ft. rather than 35 ft. in order to meet the proper width of the lot. On Lot 4, Block 1, the 45 feet for the same reasons, subject to park dedication fees and subject to the plat being sent to the Department of Natural Resources for review and comment as required by ordinance. Ms. Bosell requested an amendment to the motion requiring a variance on Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 1, to go from 35 ft. to 45 ft., referencing Ordinance 8, Section 3.02AAA and Ordinance 71, Section 3(a). Ms. Bosell noted that the adoption of this variance provides for meeting 9.06 (a) at the 45 ft. dimension, meeting the 90 ft. requirement. Maker of the motion and second approved the amendment. Upon voice vote on the motion all voted yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE 19 AMENDMENT DISCUSSION Mr. Morey reported that the Ordinance 19 Amendment was prepared by the City Attorney and placed on the council agenda during the meeting before being reviewed by the Planning Commission. Upon review, Mr. Morey stated that there were some wording flaws and questions about the ordinance amendment as it appeared at the 2-2-88 council meeting. Staff feels that it would have been appropriate for this to have been reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to council consideration. There have reportedly been semilar instances in the past. Planning staff members are presently included in staff meetings and will be able to watch for such cases allowing for Planning Commission review before-they reach City Council. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Morey reported that Riccar Heating and Air Conditioning has ap- proached staff stating that they are interested in purchasing a corner CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Item 4e DATE February 2, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ITJ.Mo:d~nance Amendment/ S~m~lar House BY: James E. Schrnatz The City Council is requested to approve the similar house ordinance or refer this to the Planning and zoning Commission. attachment COUNCIL ACTION o MOTION BY TO SECOND BY , ----. " , o o o ~~..>. ".....) "..,.' C0 Regula~ City Council Meeting Feb~ua~y 2, 1988 ~ Minutes Page 5 (Indian Meadows 3~d Addition, Continued) also like the design of b~eaking up the th~ough roads to add more cha~acter to the lot frots. He stated from a marketing standpoint and livability, he thought it Is an improvement. After discussion, Council agreed to leave the road alignment as proposed by the developer. Council also questioned whether an EAW was needed because this Is already an approved prellmina~y plat. Mr. Bachman stated they have begun that process, but will ask for an interpretation from the EQB again. Council generally agreed with the proposed Plan B-1 as presented, and advised Mr. Bachman that to change the preliminary plat; he must proceed through the Planning Commission again. M~. Haas also stated a new grading plan will be ~equl~ed. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/SIMILIAR HOUSE General consensus of the Council was to app~ove the amendment, but it was felt it should be an amendment to the Building Code, not to O~dinance 8. Also, rather than creating another Board or placing anothe~ duty upon the Planning Commission, it was agreed the Boa~d of Design Control should be the Andove~ Review Committee. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Apel, int~oducing an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 19 by adding a section regulating the ext rior design, appearance and functional plan of structures, and establishing a Board of Design Control, with the change on Item 5.06 to read: The Architectural Review Board for the City of Andover shali be and is hereby appointed as the Board of Design Control. Motion carried unanimously. CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION/LUND'S 4TH ADDITION MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, approval of the land survey Certificate of Correction of the plat for Lund's Evergreen Estates 4th Addition as presented. Motion carried unanimously. EAW/HIDDEN CREEK EAST MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, approval of the EAW for Hidden Creek East as presented. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE 13 AMENDMENT MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, Ordinance No. 13B as presented here. Motion carried unanimously. >/f LAW OFFICES OF Burke nnd Jlnwkins JOHN M. BURKE WILLIAM G. HAWKINS BARRY M. ROBINSON / y~ /' SUITE 101 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA SS433 PHONE (612) 784-2998 January 27, 1988 .... -'." " -,. ",," U" , .... .", ...... "tr-- ,,; '1>,. .~. . I ",j. = f' tl .:i' '.i. \,,:1:. ~.' ". r .j .~.'"'" ~ . ..I i' ,~~ ~.l "-^'"J, 1 :'\r'l- .- -'''--:'':~='~'14 r ,\ ;r:..'\i2')':J831 '. I Mr. James E. Schrantz Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 ,-'''-'./ 0~' r'j\iDOVER ~,--,---~.- Dear Jim: Enclosed please find an ordinance pertaining to the architec- tural control of bUildings in the City of Andover. This ordinance should be given to the City Council and the Planning Commision for their review and consideration. ()in~~nlY , ~~ G. Hawkins --rk ~ W6() ~ O~1I4{ f1:, tio- PleV'l>171 ~MISt,;o^" :r.+ ~~~S5~ f'+t. o.~ ~W<+ Y-";'Q"'t- -n, +~ c;.\Q U>lAVlc..:\' WGH:mk Ene. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8 (ZONING ORDINANCE) BY ADDING A SECTION REGULATING THE EXTERIOR DESIGN, APPEARANCE AND FUNCTIONAL PLAN OF STRUCTURES, AND ESTABLISHING A BOARD OF DESIGN CONTROL. The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain: SECTION 1. Andover City Ordinance NO.8, Section 4, is hereby amended by adding the following subsections: 4.35 Architectural Design, Exterior Facing. The application for a building permit, in addition to other information required by applicable laws or regulations, shall include exterior elevations of the proposed structure and drawings which will adequately and accurately indicate the height, size, design, and appearance of all elevations of the proposed structure and a description of the construction and materials proposed to be used. 4.36 Referral of Application by Inspector in Certain Cases. Whenever an application is filed with the City for a building permit for any structure to be built, enlarged, or altered within, or moved in or into the City, the building inspector shall review such application and accompanying docu- ments to determine whether the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of such proposed structure, when erected, will be so at variance with, or so similar to the exterior architectural design of any structure or structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the immediate neighborhood, or so at variance with the character of the applicable district as established by the zoning code of the City as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values of the neighborhood. If the building inspector finds that the exterior architectural design of the proposed struc- ture, when erected, may be so at var iance wi th, or so similar to, the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of structures already constructed or in the course of con- struction in the neighborhood, no building permit therefor shall issue and the building inspector shall within ten (10) days after receipt of the application of the building permit applica- tion and supporting documents, file the same and such opinion in -1- writing, signed by the building inspector, with the Secretary of the Board of Design Control, which shall review the determina- tion of the building inspector. SECTION 2. City of Andover Ordinance No.8, Section 5, is hereby amended by adding the following subsection: 5.06 Board of Design Control Created. The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover shall be and is hereby appointed as the Board of Design Control. The Board shall review all building permit applications referred to it by the building inspector upon his determination that the exterior architectural design of the proposed structure would violate the provisions of this ordinance. The Architec- tural Review Board shall act upon all applications or other matters referred to it within twenty (20) days from the date such application was originally filed with the building or zoning administrator. It may approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the exterior design of any proposed building or structure, enlargement or alteration and may modify, request such modifications as it may deem necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this section. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Architectural Review Board may take an appeal therefrom to the City Council. Such appeal shall be taken within five (5) days after the deci- sion of the Architectural Review Board. The City Council shall act upon all applications or other matters referred to it within forty-five (45) days from the date of appeal. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1988. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk -2- CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JANUARY 19, 1988 MINUTES The Regulae BI-Monthly MeetIng of the Andover City Council was cal led to,order by Mayor Jerry Windschltl on January 19, 1988,7:30 p.m. at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Councilmen present: Councilmen absent: Also present: Apel, EI I ing, Knight, Orttel None City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; TKDA Engineer, John Davidson; City Engineering Technician, Todd Haas; City Planner, Daryl Morey; City AdminIstrator, James Schrantz; and others RESI DENT FORUM ........, Old. /(J t1/J"1i./")(/.n:,...ini 5 Dave Piacentini. 14424 Jonquil Street - requested the City adopt an ordinance to prevent residential developing along the lines of tract homes. He was especially concerned with his neIghborhood, noting the number of Identical homes being built, some of them right next to each other. He showed pIctures of his area, explaInIng he was concerned about the reduced property values with so many identical homes. The CouncIl discussed the issue, noting It has not been a serious problem in most other developments. There was also some question on the enforcement of such an ordinance and additional time needed to check on plans of surrounding houses. A suggested guideline was to not allow the same elevation within 300 feet of each other, whIch would mean every fourth house could be the same. It was agreed to have the attorney draft a proposal for consideration at the next meeting. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by KnIght, that we direct Mr. Hawkins to prepare a draft ordinance for consIderation at our next meetIng. MotIon carried unanImously. Mr. PiacentIni - also showed pIctures of the mess In his back yard, explained what had taken place to date, and stated the problem was not taken care of last fall lIke It was supposed to. Mr. Hass stated the contractor has saId the work will be completed In the spring. AGENDA APPROVAL The followIng addItions to the Agenda were suggested: Item 5f, Waste Disposal Site Assessments; 5g, BurnIng Ordinance; 5h, IndemnifIcatIon of County; and 51, SIgnals at Round Lake Blvd. and 140th Lane, and to hold a closed meetIng with the City Attorney. Mayor Windschitl asked for a motion to approve the Agenda. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Apel, to so move. Motion carried unanimously. Continued City Council Meeting Janua~y 12. 1988 - Minutes Page 4 (TKDA/S Cont~act. Continued) inc~ease on sala~ies. He also explained the,multiplie~ Is applied only to the sala~y. not to any of the benefits paid. Because the cost of benefits have inc~eased to them. they feel the inc~ease in the multiplier is justified. Mayo~ Windschitl questioned the inc~ease in the multiplie~. a~guing as wages have increased. so has the amount TKDA receives on the mulitplie~; and that should compensate fo~ their increased pay~oll bu~den. He calculated an inc~ease in the multiple~ is a conside~abl inc~ease in cost to Andove~. No consensus was reached on this issue. Councilman O~ttel also thought the~e may be a p~oblem unde~ Article II. Page 8. ~ega~ding liability when working with hazardous toxic wastes. It was ag~eed to hold this item to allow the City Atto~ney to give his opinion on the matter. MOTION by Knight. Seconded by Elling. that we table this until the fi~st meeting In Feb~ua~y so Bill (Hawkins) can be the~e to discuss this. Motion ca~~ied unanimously. In fu~the~ discussion. Council ag~eed this could be added to the Janua~y19 ~egula~ meeting if the Atto~ney is present. ORDINANCE 19 AMENDMENT "--,,,sbl:t- 13/13' &dv Building Official David Almgren explained the draft befo~e the Council was rewritten to include previous changes suggested by the Council. He stated the intent of the ordinance is to establish an escrow account to make su~e the boulevards a~e sooded in the sp~ing. All other wording Is verbatim from O~dinance 10. MOTION by Elling. Seconded by Orttel. an Ordinance amending O~dinance No. 19. an ordinance adopting the Minnesota State Building Code as presented (Ordinance 19M) Motion carried unanimously. MSA DESIGNATION Mayor Wlndschitl stated the Road Committee will have a repo~t ready for the next Council meeting. Council agreed to discuss this at that time. MOTION by Apel. Seconded by Knight. that we table this to the next Council meeting. Motion car~ied unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting March 3, 1987 - Minutes Page 6 (Public Works/Purchase Mower, Continued) MOTION by Knight, that we allow Public Works Department to buy a mower not to exceed $9,229 by negotiating for a Toro Grounds Master or John Deere unit, with the unit to be paid out of the equipment fund, and subsequent Park Board budgets would be charged principle and interest for five years. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stone asked for direction on the purchase of a sweeper for a cost of approximately $8,000. Council advised it be placed in the 1988 budget. ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT/HOUSE BURN MOTION by EI ling, Seconded by Lachinski, that we al low the Fire Department to burn the old Vosika property in the vincity of Hanson and Bunker Lake Boulevard and authorize the Clerk and Mayor to sign it. Motion carried unanimously. 8110PT ORDINANCE 19G - u...ee. David Almgren. Bui lding Official, explained Ordinance 19G adopts the 1985 State Building Code and al l other related codes. The optional item of fire suppression systems has an exemption of 5000 S.F. And the floodproofing regulation must be adopted because the City has a flood plains and flood ordinance. MOTION by EI ling, Seconded by Lachinski, introducing Ordinance 19G as presented adopting the Minnesota State Building Code. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by El ling, Seconded by Lachinski, a Resolution establishing permit fees and service charges to be collected by the City of Andover and amending the Resolution R4-81 setting forth such fees, as presented. (See Resolution R029-87) Motion carried unanimously. NFPA 13D - INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS Ray Sowada, Fire Marshal, presented copies of the 1984 Edition of NFPA 13D, the standard for the installation of sprinkler systems In one- and two-family dwellings and mobile homes for CouncIl informatIon. He stated he Is not advocating that sprInkler systems In residentIal dwellings be required, but that the Installation be regulated if a resident decides to have one instal led. Mr. Sowada explained at the present time there are no inspections of such Instal lations to be sure they are installed according to the NFPA code. He understands the existing ones are hOOking onto the line in ~ Regular City Council Meeting March 3, 1987 - Minutes Page 7 (NFPA 13D - Installation of Sprinkler Systems, Continued) the inside of the house inside the water meter. In talking to other cities, that can cause a loss of pressure on the sprInkler system. Without inspections, the City also doesn't know whether a backflow valve Is instal led so the City water is not contaminated. Most cities require the spinkler to be hooked before the meter so the system cannot be tampered with. Mr. Stone stated there is no check valve in the water meter, and was concerned because sprinkler systems being instal led are not checked to see if they meet code. He stated there is a chance that negative pressure can be created if it is not properly installed. Mayor Windschitl questioned whether the City should be regulating what a resident voluntari Iy instal Is in a house, but he agreed there should be some method of protecting the City's water supply. He suggested if there is a possibility of developing negative pressure in the water system, there should be a check value on every meter. Council agreed to review the standard and directed the Pub! ic Works Department to determine whether something needs to be done to protect the water system. SAFETY MANllAL Council agreed the Safety Manual should be referred to the Personnel Committee to conform it to th.e City's personnel policies. Another pOint raised was including the items which almost recite state law, If the law then changes. the enti~e manual must be changed and readopted. Mr. Schrantz stated that was an attempt to put all information referencing safety in one place. Councilman Orttel also suggested an inventory and evaulatlon procedures for City bui Idings, for personal property, for parks, etc., be established. Mr. Stone stated they are working on that at this time. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Lachinski, that we refer the Safety Loss Prevention Program to the Personnel Committee for further review. Motion carried unanimously. PARK BOARD/RESCIND MOTION MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we direct Frank Stone to halt with the installation of lights in the Cedar Crest Pond and Prairie Knol I park. Motion carried unanimously. CITY 01 ANDOVER March 5, 1976 TO: ANDOVER MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Ordinance 19 relating to the Adoption of the Minnesota Building Code by Reference. (Comm. 112-76-3) The following is submitted for your consideration: "Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - February 26, 1976" Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Ortte1, to adopt them, the Handicapped Requirements and the Energy Conservation Regulations, as per reference. Motion carried unanimously. ~,~&;$t~ e10ris J. nson Commission Clerk ORDINA1'lCE NO. CITY OF A1'lDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MIN~ESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 19 RELATING TO THE ADOPTION OF THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE BY REFERENCE. The City of Andover does hereby ordain: Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts by reference the following appendixes and supplemental provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code: 1) 1973 Uniform Building Cod~ Appendixes - Chapter 55 - relating to facilities for the handicapped. 2) Minnesota Energy Conservation Regulations. Section 2. No Change. Section 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force after it's adoption and publication as required by law. Adopted by the Andover City Council on this _ day of. , 1976. City of Andover :f Richard J. Schneider - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia K. L;ndquist Clerk/Treasurer f7rf)W Tf)wn~hip Minutes of a REGULAR MONTHLY MEETING of the Grow Township Board of Supervisors held July 9, 1974 at 8:00 p.m., at the Grow Town Community Center. " Present Chairman Schneider, Supervisor Christenson, Attorney Ed Babcock. Supervisor Holasek not present. Chairman Schneider noted the Hearing on Grow's Incorporation had again until Monday, July 15, at 10:00 a.m., at the Anoka County Court House. Schneider noted the issues look favorable for Grow. been postponed Chairman Chairman Schneider noted the minutes of the past Town Board Meeting, Special Meetings and the monthly financial report were posted in the lobby. The first item on the agenda was a proposal from the Planning and Zoning Commission to the Town Board on minimum building site criteria. This recommendation was drawn up after a written request from Building Inspector Arntzen to the Planning and Zoning Commission which stated possible problems if homes were constructed to close to the ponding or re-charge areas. (Supervisor Holasek arrived at this point.) Chairman Schneider read recommendation in full. Chairman Schneider noted that he would like to change it. He noted the statement, "all areas under five (5) acres must be seventy-five (75%) percent buildable, should be broken down to; 90% of one (1) acre buildable, 70% of two and one~half (2 l/2)acre buildable, 45-50% of five (5) acres buildable. Supervisor Ho1asek felt it should be; 100% of one (1) acre, 75% of two and one half (2 1/2) acres, 50% of five (5) acres. Supervisor Christenson felt that restrictions to the land be a close as necessary to 100% to keep occupied structures away from ponds and re-charge areas. Chairman of Planning and Zoning Alan Miles noted that if the 75% factor was not agreeable, the Planning and Zoning could re-100k at this item. A majority of the Board felt this should be sent back for re-work. No vote. The Clerk Jaworski is a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission and he will relay this information to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Chairman Schneider called Harlan Lusk of Enchanted Drive. Mr. Lusk was to present a petition for blacktop of a section of Enchanted Drive. The Clerks office has a copy of the petition. Mr. Lusk was not present. Attorney Babcock noted that for a public improvement project to be intiated, 35% of the people in the given area must petition. The Township then is required to turn the proposal over to the Engineer for a feasibility study. Attorney Babcock also noted there are other ways to start these projects. Mr. Babcock also noted a Public Hearing on the feasibility study would be required. Chairman Schneider asked Mr. Babcock if these can be assessed back. Mr. Babcock stated all or parts could be assessed back. The Clerk was directed by the Board to convey this information by letter to Mr. Lusk. Next item read by Chairman Schneider was a resolution on how to deal with surplus Township property. Supervisor Ho1asek has put together this resolution. Chairman Schneider related the resolution to the Cedar Crest unauthorized dirt removal. . I'" . 6~()W TUWNSIiIf) Minutes of the REGULAR MEETING of the Grow Township Board of Supervisors, held Tuesday, April 9, 1974, at 8:00 p.m., at the Grow Town Community Center. " In attendance were; Chairman Schneider, Supervis0rs Christenson and Holasek, Attorney Bill Hawkins and others. Newly elected Chairman Richard Schneider called the meeting tJ order at 8:10 p.m. Chairman Schneider introduced newly elected Clerk, Art Jaworski, Himself, Supervisors Christenson and Holasek. Chairman Schneider noted there would be II no smoking II in the auditorium. The first agenda item, changes in Ordinance #10, was tabled because copies of the changes were not in the hands of all Supervisors. Chairman Schneider noted this would be handled at the next Regular Town Meeting, the second Tuesday in May. Minor discussion insued with the Chairman Schneider explaining that one section requiring any land subdivided under 20 acres be platted, had nothing to do with the Comprehensive Plan. Attorney Hawkins pointed out, no public hearing is required to change the platting Ordinance #10. The next agenda item. adoption of Ordinance 119, an Ordinance amending Ordinance 115, relating to the adoption of the Minnesota-Building Code by reference was read in it'. entirety by Chairman Schneider. Chairman Schneider went on to explain, this is something we must do to be in compliance with state law. No further discussion. Chairman Schneider asked for a motion, with Supervisor Christenson moving we adopt Ordinance #19 as worded. Second, by Supervisor Holasek. Motion carried unanimously. A copy of Ordinance #19 will be kept with these minutes. Third agenda item, a petition from Red Oaks Manor, l39th and l40th Avenues, was brought to light by Chairman Schneider, who asked spOkeswoman, Mrs. Lillian Adkins, what their problem was. Mrs. Adkins went on to read the heading on the petition; We the people of Red Oaks Manor. would like an engineers study done on the collective streets of 139th Avenue and 140th Avenue, to find a temporary or permanent solution due to the following reasons: 1. At times of precipitation during the Spring, Summer and Fall, the above mentioned streets break up an deteriorate and it is usually a few days before the grader comes to grade. 2. When the above mentioned streets are dry and there is a wind, the sand of these streets is blown all around. Not only does the sand blow on the lawns. heavily but also into the homes. 3. The constant deterioration of these above mentioned streets cost us money due to the rough treatment on our cars. Mrs. Adkins presented the petition to the Clerk Jaworski. General discussion insued with Mrs. Adkins going into detail. She explained, there are 160 homes in Red Oaks, with 157 occupied. In discussion with Chairman Schneider, she pointed out they'would like an engineers study done with some alternatives to blacktop being presented. The people in the area felt blacktop before sewer and water would be uncalled for. At this point, Ed Erickson entered into the discussion with road problems 'from Valley View, l72nd and Woodbine. He was told to hold off until Red Oaks was covered. .. ORDINANCE NO. ~1[' " , TOWNSHIP OF GROW COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 15 RELATING TO THE ADOPTION OF THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE BY REFERENCE. The Town Board of the Township of Grow, Minnesota, does ordain: SECTION 1. The Grow Town Board hereby adopts by reference the fOllowing appendixes, annexes and supplemental provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code: 1) State Building Code Appendixes A, D, E and F. 2) 1973 Uniform Building Code Appendixes - Chapters 15, 13, 38, 48, 49, 51, 57 and 70. 3) Minnesota Plumbing Code Appendixes A, C, D, E and F. 4) Minnesota Flood Proofing Regulations, Section 201.2 through 208.2. SECTION 2. Group J buildings and structures shall not be used or occupied until the administrative authority has issued a Certificate of Occupancy in accordance with the provisions governing any such issuance currently in effect. SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force after its adoption and publication as required by law. l' day of Q~ (/ , 1974. Adopted by the Grow Town Board this TOWNSHIP OF GROW tv ,. :-~.,.f/~ Town Board ATTEST .~~ ~~Av C erk (;:/