HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC September 1, 1987
o
CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING-SEPTEMBER 1, 1987-AGENDA
7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order
2. Resident Forum
3. Agenda Approval
4. Public Hearing/Vacation of Easement/Oak Bluff 2nd, Cont.
5. Discussion Items
a. Oak Bluff 2nd Rezoning, Cont.
b. Oak Bluff 2nd Sketch Plan, Cont.
c. LaDonna Chapman Lot Split
d. Brandon Construction Sketch Plan
e. Mark Slick/Home Occupation
f. Andover Limited Partners/Discussion
* g.
6. Staff, Committee, Commission
a. City Hall Addition, Cont.
b. Fire Department/Knox Box Requirements
1. Mailbox Ordinance
2. County Mutual Aid Agreement
3. Equipment Purchase
c. Public Works/Purchase 4x4 Truck
d.
, .
7. Non-Discussion Items
a. Award Bids/87-9/South Coon Creek Drive, Cont.
b. Appoint Representative/County Solid Waste Task Force
c. Feasiblity Report/Hawk Ridge
d. 1988 Budget Summary
e. Hanson Blvd/86-S/Receive,'Feasibility Report
f.
8. Approval of Minutes
9. Approval of Claims
0 10. Adjournment
*Closed Meeting with Attorney - 9:00 P.M.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
~5M Public HearinqjVacatio
.of ~asement Oak Bluff 2nd
Con:t.
BY: James E. Schrantz
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
4
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
See City Council Packet of 8-18-87.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Item
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1987
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Sa: Engineering
ITEM
NO.
Oak Bluff 2nd Rezonin
Can't.
BY: James E. Schrantz
See City Council Packet of 8-18-87
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Item
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1987
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
5b Engineering
ITEM
NO.
Oak Bluff 2nd Sketch
Plan, con' t. .
BY:
James E. Schrantz
MOTION BY
TO
See City Council Packet of 8-18-87
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
ITEM
NO.
LaDonna Chapman Lot
Spli t
5.c.
BY: Vicki Volk
APPROV[))D OR
AGENDA
C
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning and zoning
V
MOTION by Bosell, seconded by Vistad that the Andover Planning
and zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of
the lot split requested by LaDonna and Clifford Chapman for the
properties described as 'That part of the South 100 feet of the
North 1,160 feet of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of
the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24 in
Anoka County, Minnesota lying west of the east 322.99 feet thereof;
said distances being measured parallel with the East and North lines
of said West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
Subject to an easement for road purposes over the east 33 feet
thereof (Lot M) and 'That part of the South 200 feet of the North
1060 feet of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the South-
west Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24 in Anoka County,
Minnesota lying West of the East 322.99 feet thereof; said distances
being measured parallel with the East and north lines of said west
half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. Subject to
an easement for road purposes over the East 33 feet thereof (LotNO,
pursuant to Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 (a) (3) for the following
reasons:
1) By allowing the 50 foot piece of property to be cut off Lot M
and combining it with Lot N, each lot will have 150 feet of
frontage and meet or exceed the 39,000 square foot area require-
ment.
It is recommended that a variance be granted in regard to lot
frontage, that variance being 15 feet because the lots still meet
the requirement for on-site septic systems. The purpose of the
lot split is to allow for two building sites to be created.
It should be noted that a public hearing was held and there was
no opposition. The lot split is subject to park dedication fees
pursuant to Ordinance 40. Approval is contingent upon the combin-
ation of the 50 foot parcel with the existing parcel.
Motion carried unanimously.
COUNCIL ACTION
c
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W.
ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304
UEST .FO:RLOT SPLIT
~~~~;~',:~':~~'::~.;fr
":.::.:.:-:"<,...:~.,:.,.:'l" /JA .' / fl . _ ':;.]' -
~:;- 6, LZ/~;:'
/t17/ / (~.'..Jl;y-:)~'. .~.:5!:23
Residence J/(),/- ?/t~ 1 Business ~
Date of A~ -J1 ~L) - ~ '1
**************************************************************
....
-.:::
..~~
. -~'-~;"J"'''''~''''- .'.
-0
'Name of
Address:
~;:~~
The fOllowing information must
the lot split proposed:
J Gbrawing of proposed split
of property.
.j Gscale & North Direction
j Gbimensions of proper.ty) .
,..#l);( .E)~::t' ~d.r/uUI"':'1
~cation of existingibuildings
on and within 100 feet of sub-
ject property.
/5bate the property beca.-ne a
lot of record. ..-",__
//~~ "~r'tI ~~~
Ib~
~.. "~--'k,,:!_ ,'- .,
..._,~,..,"-::::." ~'-", <;'.:-'~.-;:;.''\ -:~''- .'
'.';. ~...
be provided by the applicant for
.Current Zoning ~-.::I
.Names and Locations of
A~jacen* Streets ~~
/{J/.{t- ~ ~ tw4VJ(ftr'
~ames and addresses of
all property .owners within
350 feet of property proposed
to be split
vI~omplete legal description
(~ ~ /vJts /Y~I?7)
~ .. ";'..~-;""">"<'~ -.-".
I hereby certify that this property has not been subdivided within
the last 3 years.
", - ~ .
''Ia:-.
.-"'''
'v.:-
Filing .Fee:
": ,::::";:~:"f. ':~
.t.....-...-..
..,
, '~-' ~
'",:, <.';':
,.
~i~~~PP~~~~a-J
..Paid
Receipt I
.51t~~g~!t~~~~,t.;A.;
".,,'.".' .
Receipt I
Q
W/~ fr-ffn A-/()~ 9.-tJ(o tL (p?) '" h:u #- hn~.,c
ttb fLnI: /{,5 f.ut ,~tMJ?{&.~~~l/fL.-I/;W.
~""'.' '...:.:":". - . ._~
:. . , ~.
h.
~::
.;.....:
.<tr{~'.'~':
. :,''r~~~~~'J_->
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
August 3, 1987
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The City of Andover Planning and zoning Commission will
hold a meeting at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, August 11, 1987 at
the Andover City Hall, at which time they will consider
the request of LaDonna and Clifford Chapman to split the
property located at 15944 Uplander Street N.W. and the
property immediately to the south (see attached sketch).
All persons desiring to be heard will be given the oppor-
tunity at the above time and location.
~Ub
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
Chapman Lot Split
Barry & Nancy Carlson
15914 Uplander Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Gary & Diane Fields
15884 Uplander Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
David & C.M. Larson
15955 Uplander Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
David & Debra LaFlamme
16001 Uplander Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
o
I ttfC'Oo...!22-'I~
-'-....
.'
lv'
JV.~
.~
LEROY H. WINNER
.1-' ~
..........,-.......-..-
... v.n... 0..... ....... .._. ">>1
,.......,1.1.,.
Joe.. 10/14
o
PRELIMINARY PLAT
"IE COR OF win M ..WI/4-7
Of $"11/4 SEt.IS,T.U.".24
I
-- - - - N.I.IN! 0' wt/2 OF ~W1/4 0' SWUlI _ ---i.-
:: 161 ST . "_..... ...... AVE. N. W. ~
C.S.A.H. '.:." NO. ..... 20
-"'---lJr':,;',---,Il/
1 V 'f.. I'; I '} A,c'''-4
~:_--~~----i-~EL-- -
~ .~I ~
~ u I~' ~ I ~ '{
IU.,' ~ W
g'~'-:-; '1~'8~-" '2.
..., !" " ~-l-:-~.~-'
~ S i~ I ~~
~ .l::'~~,_, '~-.t-1-:'-~
~ R' 'tl~!r ";
~I...!!~--~' _OJ' -r- '",
... " . 1 ,-.J.
! Q . -- - ~ L ~ '(.F-~
~,'~1~:~--=0-'8: -, ~_'":~
.. ....... . Ll-L__~_u.
,I"iol ~ H ~
cJe~ ". 'Io,....'~
'f- r~ I . ~ I
1'2~- ~- . _--J:~~:
; I
'IT _. ~1"OIlO CHAl'MAll
_0 AI: rll. ., .f tll. _..
~ ... .f a.ctt.ft IS.
<*hI, '2,. ~ft.. 24 1ft
.. CeUfttr, Mh'"...t..
9..t;~, ".)-1/,);
~
It
i
a
..
o
N
:::
.
.
o
l'~
.
'" :::
o.
u~
. ..
.0
';
"" "
....,... - '
.
i
..
-;' .~~.~.~ -=.;.1;. -!. :_ _,~.
~ ..
'~ ~
~ ~S-~'~1"!
~ ...~~ ~
J, ..
''--.:\ I ~ ~ !
. ~ . ~} f l l
~: ~ ~
\, 0
1! ~
,
I
il!
o
~: .
~
o
1
c
E
!;
.
..
~
~
.
.
JU,,'
~
w
-J
'--
,
~
~1
J
...
!
L-S.lINl 01 WI/2 01 HWI/4
OF' $WI/4
J
.
~
t
t
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTIN APPROVING A LOT SPLIT REQUESTED BY LADONNA AND CLIFFORD
CHAPMAN FOR PROPERTY IN SECTION 15-32-24.
WHEREAS, pursuant to mailed notice thereof, the Andover Planning
and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request of LaDonna and Clifford
Chapman for a lot split on the properties described as 'That part of
the South 100 feet of the North 1160 feet of the West Half of the
Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 32,
Range 24, in Anoka County, Minnesota lying west of the East 322.99
feet thereof' and 'That part of the South 200 feet of the North 1060
feet of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, in Anoka County, Minnesota, lying
West of the East 322.99 feet thereof; said distances being measured
parallel with the East and North lines of said West Half of the North-
west Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. Subject to an easement for
road purposes over the East 33 feet thereof'; and
WHEREAS, after such review, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval of the lot split citing the following: by allowing
the 50 foot piece of property to be cut off Lot M and combining it with
Lot N, each lot will have 150 feet of frontage and meet or exceed the
39,000 square foot area requirement; and ,.
WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the recommendation
of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby approve the lot split request of LaDonna and
Clifford Chapman subject to the following:
1. A variance will be granted for lot frontage on both lots
as they will still meet the requirement for on-site septic
systems.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval is contingent upon the
following:
1. Park Dedication fees pursuant to Ordinance 40 shall be paid;
2. Approval is contingent upon the combination of the 50 foot
parcel with the existing parcel. .
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day
of
, 19
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1987
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Item 5d
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
.,(~ Vr.
BY:
ITEM Brandon Construction
NO. Sketch P~an
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to review the sketch plan. 1 copy is
the proposed layout of Brandon Construction. The 2nd copy is the
proposed and recommended layout from the Andover Review Committee (ARC).
See colored sketch prepared by the ARC.
The proposed layout of Brandon Construction does not 'satisfy Ordinance
#10, known as Andover's Subdivision Ordinance.
The following comments are per ordinance #10:
6. Sketch Plan
c) The type of development proposed shall be indicated.
9.02 Street Plan
c. "No preliminary plat shall be approved wherein lots f~6nt
on:.the right of way State, County, or Community A!l:'terial or
Collector roads. Such lots may front on service roads with
entrances to the above or at intervals of 660 for Arterials
and 330 feet for Collectors" SEE ARC SKETCH showing a
service street to satisfy the ordinancereqqirements.
9.03 Streets
a. The minimum width of the Right of Way of a service street
area shall be 40 feet. The roadway minimum is 26 feet. The
ARC is reco~nending a 28 foot roadway to allow for better
vehicle movement.
h. Surface streets. In those instances where a subdivision
abut~ or contains an existing or planned~thoroughfare or
Right of Way, the Planning Commission may require a service
street (ARC recommends) parallel to and on each side of the
Right of Way in order to provide protection to residential
properties and to provide separation of through and local
traffic...
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
OTHER COMMENTS
1. It is recommended by the ARC to eliminate the corner lot.
2. The Anoka County Highway Department has received the sketch
Plan and their comments will be presented the night of the
City Council Meeting.
3. There should be a 10' additional Right of Way dedication to
Anoka County for Round Lake Boulevard, for a total of 60 feet
of Right of Way measured from the centerline.
4. The 100 yr. flood elevation for Round Lake is 869.
Therefore the lowest basement elevation shall be 870.
5. The minimum lot size is 11,400 square feet.
6. Municipal Sewer and Water will be available to the site.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Items
DATE September 1, 1987
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
5.e.
BY: Vicki Volk
BY:
ITEM Mark Slick/Home Occupati n
NO.
Mr. Slick has asked to be on the agenda to discuss with
the Council the possibility of building a detached building
in which he will operate a ceramics business.
Enclosed with your packet if a proposal provided by Mr.
and Mrs. Slick.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
DATE
September 1, 1987
APPROVE~\rR
AGENDA~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
ITEM Andover Limited Partner
NQ Discussion
5f
BY: Vicki Volk
Wayne Anderson, Andover Limited Partners, will be present to
discuss the relocation of the fence proposed for behind the
Downtown Center.
They would like to install the fence behind the ponding area
rather than in front of the ponding area.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
AGENDA SECTION
NO. St.aff,. Commi ttee,
Commission
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
6a
Building Department
ITEM
NO. City Hall Addition
BY: David Almgren
Information may possibly be available at the
City Council Meeting.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, committee,
ITEM
NO.
6.b.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1987
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
commissi n Fire Department
BY: Bob Palmer
The City Council is requested to approve the Fire
Department to require businesses to install a Rapid
Key Entry System called the Knox Box.
Attached is information regarding the Knox Box.
BP:vv
Attach.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
(jr
o
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff,
ITEM
NO.
6.b.1.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
DATE September 1. 1987
Fire Department
BY:
Bob Palmer
The City Council is requested to discuss an ordinance
that would prohibit property owners from installing
mailboxes in front of or within 30 feet of a fire
hydrant.
We have a problem at 14421 Jonquil Street.
BP:v
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
BY:
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
Commission
DATE September 1, 1987
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Fire Department
ITEM
NO.
6.b.2
BY: Bob Palmer
The City Council is requested to review the attached
Anoka County Fire Protection Council Mutual Aid Agree-
ment and to authorize the Fire Department to enter
into this agreement.
I recommend that we do so.
BP:v
Attach.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~.
o
JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF
FIRE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT
BETWEEN THE GOVERNING BODIES IN ANOKA COUNTY
1. PURPOSE
The cities/governing bodies that they have authority
pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Exercise of Powers Act,
Sec. 471.59, Minnesota Statutes, to enter into an agreement to
jointly and cooperatively exercise a power common to each of the
contracting powers, the result being to establish a Mutual Aid
Agreement between the parties with authority and responsibilities
relating to fire suppression, fire prevention, training, public
fire education, arson investigation and natural and man made
disasters common to all communities, together with power and
authority to implement such services as set forth.
II. PROCEDURE
WHEREAS, the said governing bodies desire to make
available to each other their respective fire-fighting equipment
and personnel and each of said bodies has legal authority to send
its firefighting equipment and personnel to other communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS;
1. If one or more emergency occurs within the limits of
any of the municipalities in Anoka County, or within the limits
of any territory in which any of said municipalities has contract
to furnish fire-fighting equipment or personnel of any of the
municipalities executing this contract is in the judgment of the
chief of its fire department or in his absence his assistant or
deputy in charge of its fire department, insufficient to control
or extinguish the fire or fires, an "emergency" shall exist for
the purpose of this agreement.
2. If any purpose arises, any of the pe rsons who are
entitled by Paragraph 1 above to determine an emergency may call
upon the fire department of the other municipality above named,
for assistance.
o
3. Upon receipt of a call for assistance as set forth in
Paragraph 2, the fire department of the other party hereto shall
promptly dispatch at least one fire truck with the usual number
of personel to assist in the emergency or to render standby
service as the case may be, provided that no fire department of
any of said parties shall be obligated to send its fire equipment
or personnel beyond its boundaries if to do so would leave such
municipality without any fire equipment or personnel available
within its limits for service at any fire which might
subsequently arise therein. In extreme emergencies, however,
.
~V~~~~ ~LLe ^6L~~W~1~L
page2
o
every effort will
and personnel so
emergencies which
be made to redistribute fire fighting equipment
as to make it available for any additional
might arise during the emergency.
4. The fire-fighting equipment and personnel of any fire
department assisting the fire department of another governing
body in an emergency will immediately upon arrival at the scenQ
of the emergency be under the command of the officer in charge
for the body within whose boundaries the emergency is situated.
5. No basic charges shall be made by any party
assistance rendered to another party under this agreement.
costs incurred in providing special fire extinguishing
spent may be billed for reimbursement.
for
Only
agents
6. Each of the parties will maintain insurance policies
covering their own equipment and personnel while engaged in
furnishing assistance to the other pursuant to this agreement,
and each will maintain public general liability insurance
protecting itself against claims of third parties.
7. No party to this agreement nor any officer or
employee of any party shall be liable to any other party or to
any person on account of failure of any party to this agreement
to furnish its fire-fighting equipment or personnel in response
to a call for assistance from any other municipality.
8. No liability shall be incurred by a party who shall
have summoned assistance under this agreement for damage to, or
destruction of, fire-fighting equipment of a party rendering such
assistance unless such damage or destruction shall be caused by
negligent or malicious conduct of any officer or employee of the
municipalities which have summoned such assistance.
9. Any party hereto may withdraw from this agreement by
thirty days notice in writing to the others.
10. A copy of this agreement will be on file at the fire
department headquarters of each governing body hereto. Subject
to all of the above conditions, each of the parties hereto agrees
to make every reasonable effort to attend emergencies in any of
the other communities mentioned herein when such assistance is
requested as above provided.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said governing bodies have caused
this agreement to be signed in their respective corporate names
by their duly authorized officers by authority of their
respective governing bodies as of this day of
1987.
o
~'
..
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
Mayor
Fire Chief
CITY OF BETHEL
Mayor
CENTENNIAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Commission Chairman
CITY OF COON RAPIDS
Mayor
City Manager
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Mayor
Fire Chief
CITY OF LEXINGTON
Mayor
Fire Chief
TOWNSHIP OF OAK GROVE
o
Town Board Chairperson
Fire Chief
.... v ....:. u;;. .1."..1.. ~ C ';l.6 J. I.,,;. ..:.;. w..... ~1 L.
Page3
City Clerk
Fire Chief
District Fire Chief
City Clerk
City Clerk/Manager
City Clerk or Manager
Town Clerk
,
..
~ULL1~ r~r~ Agreement
Page4
o
ANOKA/CHAMPLIN FIRE DEPARTMENT
Joint Power Board Chairman and Fire Chief
BLAINE/SPRING LAKE PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT
President, Fireboard Director
Fire Chief
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
Mayor
City Manager
CITY OF EAST BETHEL
Mayor
City Clerk
Fire Chief
CITY OF HAM LAKE
City Administrator/ Clerk
Mayor
Fire Chief
TOWNSHIP OF LINWOOD
Town Board Chairperson
Town Clerk
Fire Chief
CITY OF ST. FRANCIS
Mayor
Fire Chief
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO. Staff, committee'commissi n Fire Department
ITEM
NO.6. b . 3
BY: Bob Palmer
The City Council is requested to authorize the Fire
Department to purchase the following equipment:
Rescue Tool To be purchased with money left over from the
1986 budget. The figures are attached. The Amkus tool
is the one requested. We have used all three tools and
feel the Amkus works best for our situation. It is also
the lowest priced.
Movie Projector from Blumberg's. Model 3592. $1,110.00.
Money to come from railroad reimbursement. Information
attached.
Simulator for use with our overhead projector. This is
used for training on wildfires or any other type situation.
We do not have the availability as we did in the past from
the DNR since they closed down Carlos Avery station. The
money would. come from the railroad reimbursement.
5" Supply line hose and adapter - information attached.
Money from railroad reimbursement.
BP:v
Attach.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
c
QUOTATION-j
FROM
RESCUE ONE
SALES/SERVICE/TRAINING
44el8 ADAIR AVENUE NORTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422
INQUIRY NO.
'.
DATE
el6/28/87
TERMS
3el DAYS
TO
ANDOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD
ANDOVER, MN 5553el4
ATTN: CHIEF ROBERT PALl'ER
DELIVERY
PRICES QUOTED ARE F.O.B.:
WE ARE PLEASED TO QUOTE ON YOUR INQUIRY AS FOLLOWS:
o
~ QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT '\
1 PRESTIGE SPREADER (HSP145elU) $' ,838.00
1 SET OF 2 CHAINS- LENGTH 15 FEET (A188) I 173.00
I
I
1 SET OF 2 CHAIN ADAPTERS (A188) I 305.00
I
,
I
1 MAGNUM CUTTER (200IU) q,485.00
I
I
1 3.5 HP, GASOLINE DRIVEN HYDRAULIC PU/'1P (PEHS 000U) 2,164.00
I I
2 SE T (S ) OF EXTENS IOi'! HUSt::S, LENGTH 32 . (BVLI0 1DU) ! 678.00
4 DELIVERY & TRAINING N/C
----------------------------- -------
SUB-TOTAL ~ 10,654.00
LESS 15;'-: '. -1,588.10)
TOTAL $8055.80
~ I I
-
( QUOTED BY:
"1
..... . - -----LZ7'.;//6 (~%"'l'
QUOTATION 06'/ t'R~,.1/
CLAREY'S SAfETY r~.=
I' . "Quotation"
EQUIPMENT, Inc. !i '"''''',"0__
/;
I' June 12th., 19B7
~ Date _--=.._______.
j Terms J!.E2!a~, Ne t 20 days
i
i: Prices qUoted arc
FOB. - RO-ch.~_S.~':r:2_ Mn.
o
NORTHOATE SHOPP'NO CEN'ER. ROC"ESTER, MN "'"
r-
I
,
To
Andover VOlunteer Fire Department
16B5 Crosstown Boulevard
c/o Mr. Glenn Smith, Asst. Chief
Fire Department Headquarters
Andover, Minnesota
-"1
We are Pleased to qUote as fallows. YOur InqUiry
==.c=.==~~.~~=
~.~_De",","o"____.
.,
if
;
I,
"
Ii (30-45 days ARO)
1 DeliVery -~-----_ ______
This is the top quality large 5"
diameter hose Sold On the market tOday,
I have given Your department a price that
is unmatched fOr AngUs quality. This hose
is .arranted (2)-full years from burns and
unconditionally (10)-fuII Years from defects
in materials & workmanShip!
The friction hose of Angus is also ,
unmatched On the market tOday. AngUs truely!,
does deliver the mOSt gallons for the bUCk"
'/
As al'ayS, I truely appre'iate Your I
department. valued conSideration. If I may I
be of any aSSistance pl'ase give me a call I
at Your convenience. OUr new MinnesOta toll'
free .atts line nUmber is 1-(800)-558_8009,
55304
[ve)_/
Ne. 100' .ections of AngUs 5" Hi-Vol,
large diameter fire hose COupled 'ith
5" Storz COUPlings:
"'Specially priced for YOUr department
Dear Glenn Smith;
,gFETY IS OUR BUSINESS
--." _n. ___"__'-'_._. ..._____________________._ __""'_.
"'''-_n _. _... "__ _.___.......___________... '_'_.__
E SOT A 1-800-558-8009 .,L/:::-J
re 1-507-289-6749 R" /i"v
------------=---.
. /
/, /
Price
I'
1/
1/
1/
II
@..r$675.00ea.
rj
t-~mO""t'_1
$3375.00 I
I
,
I
,
, .
"
!i
if
if
"
,
.,
I !
I I
!
,
I
I
,
I
I
i
,
,
'!
~~~'1~~~A~rl:1;?2?5'5i'~'-fWl'C'jI9~r8}1~~GUQt
t.i'~":"~'i'<~'_:;" (.......,-:..,,' ;..:.y<', pr'J;' ':;", 0"._,;,'.'
~~ :.,:; L'~)i~;:~::.::2':,;~~-~: ,~~~:~\.L:,:-.<{.,t;/k;-~~-i~~;_-:[/-..~;::'r): ::: . ~ :_',_;,,:
.~~\;ii~~~~~}~{~~~:&:.=:2;:~~:f;;i C.,.
:'''~ .~Z~"ct~il ~......TlltATIONSTOIItAGCaYS1'IMI"'_ ',~
to!U8YClRK AVE. SO. -llLOOMINGTON, MN 11543t
18121".'.7226
Andover Fire."Dept ;':
1785 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 5530.4
Attn: Glen Smith
Per your request, below please find information and pricing
on our line of Hurst Rescue Systems and Lampe-Lifter Air Bags._
"?'::~;';'~~,~~~~~ll~!~.lf~fr~~t~f~~]~t~llf~~
. opening-'forceof, 14~5o.o.lbs . and a closing force of.'13, o.o.Olbs.- '
The Omui II Tool has .greater spreading and cutting forc~ :than. ..
.. any ,other' tool'in its ..class, with'.an- op~ning force of :12,Oo.O";lbs:
;):.gb~;:a~'I).~~ii'ri.g,:'f,.oi.ce(of:'18,o.o.O-~'lbs .-: It.. opens. . to: a'" dist)ince'of.. ..'
: 16~'6"~"';> '" .
MODEL 32B "JAWS OF LIFE" RESCUE SYSTEM - $10.,995.0.0.
Includes: Power unit of your choice
16' High Pressure Hose
Set of \6' Chains and Shackles
7 quarts hydraulic fluid
2 extra sections of hose {total or 3-16' sections)
Model "0" Cutter (90) - Upgrade to Omui II, add $36o..o.C
Upgrade to 0.-150., add $210..0.0
Incl udes : Power _un! tof your choi ce
.1:?'j.Jif~9~J~f.,r_eifJ.Surei}:Ios e .. ""
Set,of:6\:Chains<and Shack~es
7 quarts hydraulic fluid '
2 extra sections of hose (total of 3-16' sections)
Model "0" Cutter (90.) - Upgrade to Omni II, add $360..00.
Upgrade to 0-150., ,add $210..0.0.
$8,495.00.
o
* Our Model JL-27 is similar in weight to the competition, such as,
Viking, Amkus, etc., but ~% to 75% more powerful _ ask to see
independent test data to prove these enlightening facts.
OMNI II (Combination cutting, spreading & pUlling tool) _ $5,995.0.1
Includes: "Full size" power unit of your choice
16' High Pressure Hose
\.,:",
f7~'
;."'r'
I',.
!~."';
";~~}i'tfi,!~4ft;'~tf~J~~t'",h~d cyldd . $ 210 $ ~'. m: ~~
2. Hose Reel with 100' of hose - electric rewind 1,995.00
3. Hose Reel with 100' of hose - manual rewind 1,595.00
4. Model 60 Ram 1,595.00
5. Model 30 Ram l,245.00
6. 16' 'extra sections of high pressure hose 230.00
7. Air Craft Cutting Tips (for Model 175 ;00
.. ,.::.... ,~e~..~i..~:g;:t~;.~.~~~~~s. Jfo... c' 't.~ii;E~;S1~~~g..
{j'?1~::,,~,;' , :~~~~~~~!:~B:tb:SK;i';;:':~;;;'~.~+':~fi"~:i;~;..",,,,... "..295 ,",00 ;.,
"' p\;~,F;t~~~'~~ill ..'. .:,.f;i,,,~~~~~~~l~~'
:UrUike""bur ;competi tion, ourLampe:"Lifter:;A,:tr.~agsJare "f,Ully, ,/.. ->,",<0..,
',;i~~;;'kl~~i!!~~~l1~~i~fE~!~~!lh~_~~j!~i!~~;I~i;;
:; \:1":':'::;;"-;>-ericlosedbrochure' for-'pri ci ng.
If. you have any questions or would like to set up a demo on
the above items, please do not hesitate to contact me. We
are the factory authorized distributor for both products in
the state of Minnesota with full service capabilities and
parts in stock.
Very truly yours,
METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIPMENT
,,,.,-,.:.....;/} -'~~
. ~..!r.tAZ - ·
,/
. -.i'.j.:",.,~,: -\:,;:;,}GaF:': ~ Chaplin "
. .
GRC/kc
enclosure
,
o
P.S. I have enclosed a list of our Hurst Tool installations.
Please feel free to contact them regarding our product
and service.
;f:~~I~if~~i~ii~if~i~~!~~.~c .. .....
t '.. ....~.istge" Pttmp;ofany line of rescue tools. It comes
standard'l.r1tfi1:wo:20ft. sections of hose instead of 16ft., the rack
and pinion drive of the spreader is the smoothest and safest of all
spreaders currently available. The built in check valve is another
added plus. The one. step shift lever is a simple shift to ei ther color
coded toolasyo~can~attach all .or rather two tools at th~ same
";""t~,~~';'~,~,:iust..a...~1,lII!'l~...shit. froll! ..()ne side to. ..the_co;;her:~Willgi..~~.'.',..y~u'_....
.~.... ,w'.h/half:......el.h.~f...\~j..:.i~~.;h.,.ueIi?
"':a.:.
~El~. :\a180 will'gi.,e...-as'litan1~training:;;liIess:ions-as
members of your rescue unit feelcoiato~iable with
""-;-. ',,"
~. .1,'-"::< '~":.':
:: - ....--,,- -,.'~;- ;-;..'":..--'_..". -'. - ',. .
MQde,I~30C32'" Spreader with
Mode~25 Cutter
Amkus'/ilodeIB-lOl. Poweruni twi th
sectfi,Q:ns';''8"thc;h'e:d. (c;~l 0 r cod e d)
--_.--~-
ARO)
.FILMOSOUND MODEL 3585/359ZAUTQLOAD16MM PROJECTORS
/// /" ~
. CIFICJ\TIONS...",
1;'i.4:.~(W) X 11;8" (H) x8.1" (D)."
1(;J6!iJi300x206mm) '.
\Yi,i30;421bs. (13.8Kg)
:/"40 lbs.(18Kg). .
.fC:{'~.ELlle"~t ,.. ~-s(){Jiu:Z;.C;CI05-125 VAC; 5Q/80 Hz
. ST/.NOOO:omCS:. . .2" (50mm) f/1.26'element
, .'.r' . coated. with micro-focusing
, . .,:.;;..,.,.,...;.,.,.'..,....:,'~.'..,.;;'..'..;,.,../..'.,;,.'..(,'...,...';....;,.;.'.".,:."..,., ...160 lines permm (center)
. '.. .. ..;.\'..resolution;.. ".,....... .
3-blade standard. optional
2-blade.
24 FPS. sound projection.
optional 18 FPS, silent.
Automatic loop restorer.
24V, 250 watt. tungsten halogen
(ANSI Code ELC).
L.....I>,{P BRIGHTNESS: 850 lumens typical (2-blade
. .... shutter). 650 lumens typical
:'> . .,. ,., ... ,(3-blade shutter).
;;~7*f;~'~i;",:,,,,"y'1~~o:;o&~terpacitor. '..
~;. . ,-,_~'~.~OL~_, Single'~tarytype.Motorllamp-::
. .'::'" .,);/;",., l~koutswUcb,forJorward,. ,....,...
:t");;~~';~;f~f',: '. \:;..:i,i'>;~Jf;:;,:Di:i;:"g..J~:fefj5~cl~d::eieci~~i~:/i,....
".," ,. ".......:: /push buttons with optional .
." . . ','. ,. ,..' ".'.7 .. . .... remote,{;ontroL
,', _ \ :+~~?'2H::::~/s~Oe~ ~el-to-reel. Na
. .,C,. ',.,....,".-
.."',;:,;ci~;0Pj;i;i.(.i';' '" reel or arm position ~hange
;";"'4~~i~~~~~{~};r~'~~;~rl~~~~~~i~.tilm
STn.LPlCTURE: Manual. with heat filter.
REEL CAPACITY: 400'-2000' (120m-600m) reels
accepted.
8 ohm W' phone, with 600 ohm
. unbalanced auxiliary line when
.'using W' stereo phone plug.
25 watt RMS. Solid state
. (plug in module).
Built-in 4"x 6" (10cm x15cm)
oval speaker..
Individual treble and bass.
4 V tl.75A (ANSI Code BRK)
0.2% WRMS.
Built-in microphone jack.
, ~-..;~:::
- -~-\
.' sl-itJj'TER(:.' .' .
OPERATING SPEED:
LOOP CONTROL:
PROJECTION LAMP:
SP~ld(EI{~-.-.
. SOiJNDCQNTROLS:
:. EXCI'l"ERr:.AMP::
WOW &:iLUTl'ER:
PUBUC ADDRESS:
~'..~'- ..;;
~"~; _:, 1IIiIDrrWft...
__ . ..r
.,
'-<~
'~:-,._ii :; \',:, ,~,;"..;;-,' ;-
. - -~./:' - ~- - ~,<<;,}:;'-'::~
:,
0.:'
172mm
-68- -
.,.';
- ...- --...
. t95mm '
7.7"
(
~;if~nt '..
O'lO,.> ...,
c;<;?,jtt~~hed:~~~~pe~n,~ntir;""" ..
,{,~'S(~_~or
'OPTIONAliACCESSORlES
:.;PJt6rBCTlON__ESi/.' . .'.
.. .~.teDltJi~*f,erlure
l4"(12.5mm)f!iS,
1" (25mm)f/1.5
1.5" (38mm) f/l.5
2" (50mm) f/l.2
2,5" (65mm) f/1.5
3" (75mm) f/1.8
4" (l00mm) f/2.2
Zoom Conversion Lens for .75 to 1.25 x
prime lens. Screws onto prime lens from
1.5"-3"1en",es,.. .::-;;-.<', .... ..... .....
'Large Diameter Zclim,I'~~~%.;:hrlghter)
(.75 t01.3~pnmelens): 'Screws onto prime
lenses frOm,1"3~ lenses. .
UC" Cln~~~.l..elJS; .>.
Cfuemas~~()lde~.for lelises.to2.5~'
PROIEctI()~'tAMPS . .
BRK exclt~~p.4~O,75A
ELC. 24V.~W. ........
ElL. 24V.2t)QW
Part No.
5059
5060
5061
5019
5062
5063
5066
5024
5067
5030
5428.
5104
5100
5102
~(
gfJ~'AC~~~~QRIES
.,,,""'......r-.:,..;t,;;.".k'\:\\:..:.,:.........
".'_ ,. _,~.""15jJ _,~i',"~: ,',~'"'S:.":>:'i~.;::P1'~'i6~";:.~: "<":;.. )
kit.Vdth 50' (15cm) self-storing
. MISCH
.;:.....~..
. SPeaker
cord
Thlecine conversIon kit
Hour meter
Wired remote control for model 3592
5203""..
5275
5870
5880
5816
BEll&HOWEll
Augi9'WsI.t;af/Video ProdU9ts<
DlstrlbutedbyElkl International. Inc.
27882C"rnjno r:apill!rano.. . .
Laguna Nlguel. Callfel'Il~il92677'8000
714/582-2511 .",
....',.."'.,.
~;".',J"''',_,'',
!'-.~
',' '~:"'';
aLUMS .R.Q'~OMfl4UNtOATI~"fl tN@.
..52$No.W.."lngtttrl Anf\\t. . . (
~i,~"I1~OlI'.MN .''-01
~,'. ...X.T"'PIi0n..,2;,333.1211
?
o
ADDITION TO 1982 UNIFOR~ FIRE CODE
FINAL APPROVAL AT AUGUST 1981 MEETING
Section 10.209 KEY BOX
(a) When access to or within a structure or an area
. is unduly difficult because of secured openings
or where irnmediateaccess is necessary for life-
saving or fire-fighting purposes, the chief may
require a key box to be installed in an accessib1
location. The key box shall be a type approved
by the chief and shall contain keys to gain
necessary access as required by the chief.
~~
,
~~
~
pit
o
,,~;Typlc~lIy;.K!'lQ*.,aQ)C~eysare canledon all major apparatus .andparamedicunlts. .
. The only n1~rklng.onth key Is thevehlcle equipment number. .
f;.orstlU mQ~Q.~~p~.ri~y,Kn9x-aOXes are available with tamper switches, tbat c,ange
. c.onne?tedto8'i:>ullcllng's fh;e or burglar alarm system. 'c
~ T'" (, to ". .... .\......'.... ...:,...~...'-.'..,':.'~.'.:..~'.......,.:.\..;~..;....~,_t..:..:.'~......:~.......".......;_..,:.,,:-,.,~... ..,~.;....'.'~.~...':..;.:,r.~...":.'.{,.~.;'..t .. ~." 'C'",'
.;':;~~~~(i:;~&,.." . . - . ..' . : "':'..
. WHO"CA ..' ",,;~.9'RI~f::AKNOX.BOX SYSTEM 1" .. .
Only.af!re.{df)pirtm,Elntl That way, you stay In complete control.of tile system~n' .
your area; The.pmchase of each Knox-Box is tightly controlled by YOlii' department
. through.the:tis&iofasPeclal authorization forms you receive from The KlloxCompany.
ThebuHcii.!l$H~1N;/1~r.rou~lgetthis~9rm from you and have it.signedbya{ire.deparV'<.2;,
mento'f,f/Q~.I)'l.'Q.'~$lgnatureis 'reg istered on the approved list at o~Lfactory. .:
NoordetjfjJlli~fAlieSSfJ'dwlthout the authorized fire department signature; ".
. ..,..,:,..,~:~~_;:,~<~'_,:"':.~:':'~~~_~_:;;~:."~<",-:'';'-"".',_"'--' ' .' . ' - '~i , " :-:'__',':
AHer yerlfx,lng~tb~.~lg!,u~Wre,we ship the Knox-Box right to the purchaser;We use
...... ..... . UP,Sa6(f~f'j:E!k'~'~Cl<",o..vledgement of Delivery Receipt". Each:Kllox-BoxJsshipped... ,.
...;i.,%;,~;~;,~~,,w.t.U! . '.~~n.()penpo~ition and. ready for mounting by th~J:)Ui.l9/tlg;;;t-'
"...!;;....:ti~;.r~zz~~'. ." _..'~.' :~!i~~~;:iO...th~:t/~:. depa~tme~t..Jhe.:bui:I;/~'~\~~~~;~J~;~Ji~:~i:;(J;~
for, and'/ .sttfebox;Wesupply you with all necessary forms and keys at no ...
chargEtto your department .
o
.','~,;-~"" ,"'. .<',\;';~'-;':
.....
. . -'. - "..'~'.<'.,:;;,,:.:..- -- :';;" ,.:..,,~" ",-,
HOW"S\.,~~..8())flNSTALLED ?,
. '.<: '," _',:'_':-''l:~,_;'__ _:,' '_' ."'- _ .~- -.: "> "'~' ..":' -. - ",' _ " _ _ _', ,'_ '_:, .1" -'.
Asdiredfed~~y~uh{jep-artment,'the building owner secures. the Knox-Boxio the....
c,puUding's, ~)(t~rlor..The 90xshQuld be mounted In a prominent location,S' or more.> .
.. .'abovegrcill.rtdleyetTti'S;lJ)p~oach discourages tampering, yet keep's the box avail>' .
able 10rinstant access by'emergency service personnel. ..
'.; ,".... ..
AfterIIl'St~>>rtr()lf'IScb'mpteted, the fire department is notified and afire fighter is
assigned to- inspeottheinstallation and to lock building keys Inside. Now the'. .
Knox-Box .statlonis ready for service. .
o
HOW CAN I START A KNOX.BOX SYSTEM IN MY AREA l'
It's easy. Just complete the Free Registration Form and mail it to us. We'll send full
details and all necessary materials by return mail.
Arid we'lrha~leall the rest - security clearance proeeduresj'processinQ of
authorlzed.qrger~,and recordmalntenance.L,[;' . ....... ......
. . . ~J"f~.,.
. .....;,.'.:......~..;..'....:.'..;,...._.'.,~...~..........:.;,.;.t..........:~..'.:,.~...':.,'..".~.:.....,~.~.,.~...._..:'...:.,..."........<...,:........~.,..,......i,-.<..,;;' ..' .," . .~. "".",,"..., .:i,':-'.." '--:;,. .'. ;.i. .i,x'
. . ," .. - .:..l'~;'L,:'!,-'7.'.{;~,',..#.,..,i',,;:',,'1'\h',)>, ~/'C"',,~,~",....
','i:'t{'THEKNOX COMPANY ;~~~~\'!~!t{","'~;,~i~~!.
Post Office Box 2684
Newport Beach, California 92663
. . (714) 675-2885
..i(";~;':- ;:\A::~.:Ri),:i.~:;-::~~'~.
FOR
FASTER
FIREFIGHTING
WHAT IS A KNOX.BOX SYSTEM?
It's a high-security key box system, designed to give firefighters and emergency
services immediate access to locked buildings, elevators, and other secured areas.
HOW DOES THE KNOX.BOX SYSTEM WORK?
The building owner purchases a Knox-Box and mounts it securely on the exterior
of the building. All necessary building keys are locked inside. Only the fire depart-
ment's master key can open the box.
The Knox-Box is your key to rapid, non-destructive entry, And it's roomy enough to
hold everything you need - keys, electronic entry cards, instructions and more.
HOW WILL KNOX.BOX HELP MY DEPARMENT?
Faster Fire Fighting! Immediate access reduces property damage and can even
save lives. Also, our system eliminates the need to carry large numbers of keys and
provides top security with key accountability. The Knox-Box System can even be
used to improve the operation of mutual aid assistance between communities.
o
HOW SECURE IS A KNOX.BOX SYSTEM? .
Security has always been a Knox strong point. Designed t'(!)-,,~aximum protection,
each virtually Indestructable box features a special high-seaJrlty Medeco lock and
'ro'
key. This Medeco restricted locking system guards agal11".t unauthorized key
duplication. Keys aren't even available to locksmiths or lock,'distributors - only
The Knox Company can supply these keys! J'Ui ,:
Our system offers maximum security at every step. Each city has its exclusive
key code. All Knox-Box stations in that city are keyed alike. And only the fire depart-
ment has the master keys,
Keys are never sent with key box station. Instead, they're sent direct by registered
mail to the fire department. Keys are furnished free to the fire department.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
BY: Frank Stone
;is
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
Commission 6c
ITEM~'Public Works/Purchase
NO. 4x4 Truck
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
The City Council is requested to allow Public Works to go out
for price quote on new 4x4 truck with 2 way plow to assist in
plowing cul-de-sac etc... for the winter of 1987/88. With the
money to come from the Snow and Ice Budget for 1987 due to the
excess balance left in the budget.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1987
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Item
7a
ITEM Award Bids/87-9/South
NO. Coon Creek Drive
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY: James E. Schrantz ~~
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution awarding
the bids for project 87-9 South Coon Creek Drive (East)
Bids were received August 14 at 10:00 a.m.. The Bids were tabulated
and a recommendation is attached.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
OF PROJECT NO. 87-9 FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF SOUTH COON
CREEK DRIVE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in
Council Resolution No. 117-87, bids were received, opened and
tabulated according to law for Project No. 87-9, with results as
follows:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE BID
Forest Lake Construction Co...........$ 93,822.05
Valley Painting.......................$106,631.25
Alexander Construction Co.............$110,251.25
Alber Construction....................$118,571.75
Anderson Bros. Const..................$121,446.65
Northern Asphalt Const................$l23,653.43
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the above bids as shown to indicate
Forest Lake Const. Co. as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED to hereby direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with Forest Lake Const. Co. in the amount of
$93,822.05 for construction of Improvement Project No. 87-9 for
Street Construction in the area of South Coon Creek Drive (East); and
direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposit made
with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and
the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been
executed and insurance and bond requirements are met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
,l9
with Councilmen
voting in
favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was de~lared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
o
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
Bonestroo, Ros ne, Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
Olio G. Bonn/roo. P.E.
Nu/w" W. Huwn~. P./;',
JURpIt C. Atttkrlit. P.t.',
BrtMlj(Kd A. L,mMr,. P.!:.',
Rklulrd E. TIU"rr, P.E.
JIJIMS C. Obott. P.E.
o
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
612.636.4600
Engineers & Architects
August 18, 1987
\{G~G~~~~U
;.-.-.---..--
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Anoka, MN 55303
Attn: Mr. James E. Schrantz
City Engineer
_'T" rr:- ,. !\.p''''''\0'/FI"?
Re: South Coon Creek Drive
MSAP 198-l08-06
City Project No. 87-9
Our File No. 17126
Dear Jim,
G/~"n R. Cook, P.E.
Keith A. Gurdun. P./::.
Thull/cu' f.', Nuyel>, P.1::.
Hichurd W. f'ost~r. P.E.
Holwn G. !X'huni("hl. P.E.
MlIn';n L. SoTWllu. P.E.
Donilld C. Bur,c"dl, P.E.
Jerry A. Bourdun. P.E.
Mark A. H(lfUCJn. P.I:.',
Trd K. Fit/d. P.E.
Mid'Qrl T. NIIU'''''''", P.E.
Hubert N. PJ4!JJi-r/t'. 1'.1::.
[hllid O. Luskulu. P.I::.
Thuma W. ~lrrsun. P.1:.'.
M;c:hiHl C. LYlld,. P.I::.
Kurrn L. Willis, P.E.
1um,s R. Mil/and. P.E.
Ktnn~,h P. Anderson. P.E.
Keirh A. &,'hmllnn. P.E.
Murk R. Rolfs, P,E.
RUM" C. RUSMk. A.I.A.
Thumos E. Angus. P,t:.
~.CJlI L. Yu'",g. P.t:.
Chu,/es A. /;r<<,'!$un
Leo M. Puwl!l.J;ky
HurlQn M. O/JiM
Swan M. Eberlin
On Friday, August 14, 1987, sealed bids were received for (MSAP 198-108-06),
South Coon Creek Drive. A total of six (6) bids were received. All bids have
been reviewed, checked and tabulated. The following is a list of the bids re-
ceived:
Contractor
Forest Lake Contracting
Valley Paving, Inc.
Alexander Constr. Co., Inc.
Alber Cons1truction, Inc.
Anderson Bros. Const. Co.
Northern Asphalt Const., Inc.
Bid
$ 93,822.05
106,631.25
110,251.25
118,571. 75
121,445.65
123,653.43
We have worked with Forest Lake Contracting on projects within the City in the
past with satisfactory results. We would recommend that the project be
awarded to Forest Lake Contracting for the bid amount of $93,822.05. The
plans and specifications must be approved by the Minnesota State Aid Office
prior to award of the project.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
c:;zy/L ~ ~
Glenn R. Cook
GRC: Ii
5863e
o
N N N
'" '" '"
.... 0 0
.... a- a-
'" '" '"
o N 0
.... ... ....
N N N N
I..n VI VI "'"
~ ~ 2 2
.
Vt a'\ VI VI V'I \on
o 0 ..- .... 0 _
..... N - .... to.) CD
N N N N
W W W W
VI .po .f:'o ~
..... .... .... ....
N ...
.... ....
.... ...
.... ....
.
'" '"
:; ~
'" '"
o 0
co 4>-
c ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~__ ~_ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 ~ a ~ ~ ~. ". ~. .
=. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~
~ ~ ". ~ ~ 2 "' = g
~CtgArJJ~O:~.~.='"4~
~n::s rv """'tina_
; ~ g i ~ ~ ~ & Ct ~ ~. Ct
- ~.... -". ~ n n ". a
(\>.-.. n ell c:: c:: t1\ c: ....
~ ~ ~ _ .... .... 0 ~ H
~ <<<rtc:.n
CD a' G '" a. c:
~. ClI '" ... ...". ...
~ ~. "rt~ G
" ...
o 0
.... .... t>
Co
"
.... .... "
.... ....
.... ...
o
"
"
...
'"
"
"
"
"
"
'"
...
,
N
~
....
"
....
'"
a- 4>- ....
....
...
'" '" '"
" " "
t> t> t>
... ... ...
"
....
'"
.... .0 ....
... co '"
000
000
000
....
'"
~
... .0 ....
00 ... '"
000
000
o 0 0
....
....
a-
...
'"
"
...
'"
:-
.... " ...
.... ... '"
o '" 0
000,
000
....
'"
'"
'" ... N
'" 0 '"
000
000
o 0 0
....
....
'"
N
'"
:-
a-
'"
.... .0 ...
'" '" '"
o 0 0
o 0 0
000
....
'"
....
.0 00 ....
o 0 '"
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
....
'"
00
....
'"
"
'"
o
.... 0 00
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
....
'"
'"
...
...
'"
o
."
'" 0 00
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
000
.-
.... .0 0
o .0 '"
o '" 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
'"
.0
....
'"
.0
'"
o
...
'"
...
'" .0 0
o 00 '"
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
'" '"
... to
" ..
p ~
o
e ~
" .
- ..
...
B
'" ...
Co ..
" ..
c:
~. ~
..
"
"
"
I>
~ ~ > > rl 0 ~ n n
....OOQOQOCRl.......
.:;"~oq;:II~&::
1IQ.""OC<C7't1
I1OQOQ t".p "........
.... .. ell _ P ::J
=:~~l:J' ~oqOQ
~!:~~ ~
. . . 0 ....
~ lit' AI ill 4: g
CA n 0 fA
51 l:'" .... ....
.... 0 (II ..
H c: llll ell
IT .... " .
" ...
" I>
I> "
w w W I..n V'I
W Vt VI VI N W N N ~
~ N N 0 0 VI ~ V'I ~ 0
P:t C"" C"" ~
" ..
('II "IiI IoQ ....
...
'J ~ 'J 'CJ ~ ~
~ Q P Q P P
.... ...
~ .... N VI..- I..n .... VI
o ~ .f:'o ~ 0 N ~ ~ ~ .....
000 _ 0 VI 0 0 0 0
00000 0 0 000
~CD NQ\VI~.p.
......W~WVl~~.....~VI
N 0 .f:'o CD 0 Q\ 0 ...... VI Q\
o ~ CD VI 0 N Q\ VI N 0
o 0 0 0 0 Vt 0 0 0 ~
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 000
.... ...
~ N W VI.... VI .... VI
o ..... N .... ~ N ~ .... ~ ~
000 _ 0 VI 0 0 0 ~
000 0 0 0 0 0 0 VI
....
00 ....
'" 0
o 0
.
....
o ... ...
Ow..... ....
o ...... ~ 0
o V'I C> 0
.... ....
..... .... CD .... 0\ _
o .f:'o ..... W VI N
a ~ 0 .... ::. 0,
0.0.0 0 0 0
.....;:' ..w.....Q\Q\.f='o
CD ..... Q\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
g ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.
o N ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0
000 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~
. .
o '" '"
000
.... ...
~ .... \,A ..... ""
:- w C>> 00-0 ....
UI :... N 0 \,n 0 l.A
o UI UI 0 0 0 0
....
C>> 0 N ~ VI C>> .Jl'"
~ .... w ~ ~ l.A _ ~ N ~
o W C>> N C>> C>> 0 ~ 0 0
o ~ ~ l.A .... .... 0 N 0 0
o 0 0 0 ~ NO,"" 0 0
000 0 0 '"" 0 0 0 0
.... ....
~ N W \,A _ ~ ~ ~ _
'"" '"" - .... 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 l.A
.
~ g ~ 8 g
o N VI N 0
00000
...
00 ....
N ~ "" .... .f:'o
o 4>- N
o 00 0
00 0 0
~ :5 g
'" ... 0
o a- co
o '" ..
o ~.O
000
t ::; f t:
o 0 C>> 0
o ~
o 0
~ :5
... N
... to>
.... ....
.... ....
'" '"
o 0
.... ....
NNNNN
..... ..... ..... - .....
00000
"" ~ .J:'- _ _
UlUlUl\,AVI
woooo
\on ..... ..... ~ N
..
..
t>
"
.<
"
"
...
Co
Q
'" '"
'"
~
"
a
I>
"
"
N ~
" '" '"
\A 0 0 N W W
00000 0
...-I n n rn pj M
g r< r4 t< ~ ~
... ...
'" ....
~ ~ N ~ 0 0
.... w woo 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
....
.J:'-~VI .....~
~ ~ ~ VI.....
.J:'- '"" \It ~ 0 0
\It 0 0 0 0 0
000, 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
'" 4>-
Q\ ~ N VI VI VI
W \A ~ 000
o 0 000 0
....
l.A W ~ ....._
... ~ N ..... 0\ W
W ~ VI 0 VI VI
Ut 0 0 0 0 0
00000 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
'" ....
(7Io\D~WOVl
Ut 0 ..... 0 0 0
o 0 VI 0 0 0
....
Ut ... ~ N
~ Ul ClO l.A N
N 0 ~ Q\ 0 Ut
'"" 0 VI 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
.... .... '"
to> '"
'" 0
"" ~ 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
.... ....
Oo~VI
l,o.J .... 0 .... '""
.... ~ 0 N \.n 0
VI 0 000 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
.... :-
" ....
o 0
....
" ...
... 0 0
..... Q\ 0 0
'"" VlI 0 0
.... ....
OJ N .... W
..... ~ OJ N \0
U VI ..... .... 0 0
o 0 \A ~ 0 0
000 0 0 0
000 0 0 0
....
'"
>
0>
'"
'"
8
~!
...
Q
Q
~
I~
I~
o
o
~~
~I::
00>
......
~ti
...
z
o
.
I[
l:r
:;.
'"
~
...<
~~
. (;j
......;
z
o
I[
...
I~ /2'
z
O>~
;I",
If I!
o
o
I~
o
o
Z
en
...
~~
0",
...'"
......
o
'"
...
1'1
I[
I~
o
~~
...'"
~i:l
00
...'"
...
0",
z~
...en
z.
o
I~
'"
~
'"
o
en
~
...
...
!:!
....
.
!"
'"
>
~H>
. Q
.
~~
~ S'
en",
o
...'"
>Q
..
...
"'''
"'I>
""1>
..."
....
:-
'"
.
'" '" '"
ass
.... '"
o PI 0
: ~ ~
~ ~ ~
" 0
...
...'"
"'0
:::~
0>
0::'"
I> '"
~8
...
2~
Qen
...'"
",1:\
....
'"
ni
" '"
.....
...~
"'...
~
..
>
0>
en
o
o
~
en
.... 00 '"
o ... 0
.!... c
g - ;l
o
8
'"
o
o :0 1::.
~ Q:lo pJ
(II ,!. ~
o 0
... 00 '"
~ ~
>
1c ~
.;:
....
'"
~
~
"
c:
0>
...
~
'"
.... ... 0
4>- t:l ;:j
.... PI is
~ ? ~
en...
~~
~.
...
....
....
~ ~
;:j
'"
"
...
...
~
'" I> H
I> ..
.. .. ...
t> "
" "
..
CT
...
t>
..
"
"
...
'"
...
!"
~
c
...
'"
'"
.
.
~
S
...
o
Z
o
...
;.:
...
...
<
'"
....
o
0::
en
..
'"
...
'"
'"
o
...
en
...
X
I::
o
PI
~
'"
'"
...
I::
~
~
"
...
..
"
"
...
...
.
...
..
"
Q
~
~
o
o
~
N
~
'"
110
I
o
,
~
00
...
....
PI
...
PI
...
'"
o
~
e;:4~
o ~
(:l PI
'"
'"
'"
?
~ ..,
'" 0 ~
:::; 1:: ~
~ '" ...
.... ...
~
'" ... f;:
Z ~ ~
~
o
o
n
i ~..,
... '" ~~
1:: <: ....'"
en 0 Hri
... ... '"
t;I ~ G'l~
PI ~ . S;;
;oj bi ... PI
PI '"
po !'
~
~ 1:1
~ ~
~ ...
>4 ~
o ... <:
~[!:
'" . ...
n PI
'" N'"
... '"
PI n
...
o
~ 0
v. ...
~ <:
...
'" '" '"
e; ~ FI 8
'" G"> <: '"
~ ~ = ~
~ :z; ~ ~
~ PI PI
~ '"
Q\ r ~
~ '"
N <: '" t""
- ~.... :
t;f;;:::~..
N '" ~ '" t"'
I ... PI
~ '" ~
'" ~ '" PI
g n;oj
~ E =
N
~ ~
~
'" ... ~
~ ... '"
~~~ .;
o ~ ... ~
:::: ::i ~ 1:: ....
'i' '" '" ~ ~
o ... 0
8 ~ ::: ~ ~
... n 0-1 '"
\,II H PI
1II Z SG t-4
~ PI '"
~ n
N ...
...
~
a-owc;:
I-cn.....H
N cn LoJ 0
- M _ PI
o I
., ~...
t ~ ~ E
., .. H
: ~ ~ ~
'" ~ i:i ;oj
n
~ ~ ~
H 0-1 PI
... '" '"
"''''
.... no
"'z
...
o 0'"
... '" '"
'" 0
on",
'" o.
...
...
12
'"
..
'"
..
n
o
Z
'"
.n:
"'PI
at
00
ZPI
n'"
o
'"
..
n
o
'"
'"
..
~~
n",
0-1 PI
S'"
'"
'"
..
'"
..
'"
...
'"
'"
o
~
n
PI
~
n
'"
PI
n
...
n
~
'"
o
PI
...
i
~
..
~
!
i
i
i
I
~
..
..
~
f
i
I
f
~
I
i
..
!
..
i
~
~
~
~
~
~
..
!
..
~
..
..
~
i
~
..
i
i
I
..
~
~
I
~
i
i
~
i
~
-: ~ ~ ~ ~
... ~ ..
~ c: ,.. c 0
o .... c. ....
c~c:~
'" '" "
gl CD {t.I rT ;r
t"" 0 .... 11 C
::s .... p C '1
r1' "'0 " 1't ,...
... .."
" ..
....
o
~
'"
..
'"
PI
'"
...
o
.,.
'"
...
00
N
N
o
'"
.,.
~
o
'"
'"
...
~
N
'"
.,.
~
~
o
N
'"
~
N
'"
.,.
~
~
00
'"
...
....
...
'"
.,.
~
N
~
t
'"
'"
'"
00
o
o
...
...
o
.
~
'"
...
'"
o
o
o
o
....
o
N
~
o
o
o
o
'"
o
~
o
o
o
o
o
'"
o
.,
o
o
o
o
o
.
N
'"
N
....
N
o
o
o
~
a-
~
a-
o
....
ONNNNN
VllIIl.AlIIVI""
0\ ...., ..... ..... ..... .....
+--V\VlVlVlVI
.
Q\\,QVlVlVlVl
0_......000
W..o_UlW_
....
...
"
..
c
...
= r;.
"
~ '1
...
.. "
~ 0
...
..
.... 0
'< ...
"d_,....
110__
~
...
"
110
H
~
o
o
N
'"
0... ~
000 0
'"
o
'"
...
...
r; ~ ~ ~ r; :a
=..... ..."
It ...
o
~
'"
...
'" a-
'" 0
....
'" a-
.... '" 0
(;) a N ~ (;) (;)
(;) (;) N 1.Q (;) (;)
'"
....
o
o
o
....
ON'"
VI ~ ..... 0
(;) 4='- ..... (;)
.
a I.J VI 0
(;) 0 (;) 0
~
.... '"
N 0
'" 0
o 0
o
....
o
~
N ., 0
VI V'l (;) w
(;) 00 N W 0 (;)
o (;) (;) :0 0 (;)
(;) (;) (;) U'l (;) (;)
~
N
o
o
o
'"
...... ~ 0 N VI W
N VI 0 ....." 0 (;)
VI 0 00\00 (;)
(;) 0 0 1II 00 00
o 0 0 0 00 0
o
~ ., N
..- f....oJ ..... VI
00 (;) ~ w VI V\
o '=> 0'\ -.! 0 0
o (;) 0 III 0 0
'"
o
~
...
o
o
o
o
~ VI N .... VI
III W 0 0\ 00 VI
VI 0 0 N ..... (;)
.
o '"
o 0
o 0
o 0
'" 0
o 0
o
N ~ VI
N N VI \,II
OVlN-F"'O.V'l
0000000
aoVlOOO
'"
o
...
o
o
o
o
VI
- +-- ..... N N VI.
- N N 00 ..... III
o VI V\ (;) VI Q
<=> 00 0 (;) 00 0
o 00 0 0 0 00
?
N
'"
N ~ VI
- N N VI
oOww"",,O
000_000
00000000
~
o
'"
o
o
VI
..... .p. N N N VI
ONln.....O\O
VlOOONO
.
OOaoUla
o 0 (;) 0 0 0
o
'"
a-
~
'"
o
....
'"
..
gj
'"
...
t;I
n
o
;oj
r3
~~.
...
o
"
...
~
...
o
'"
~
...
....
...
;.:
~
If
I~
n
o
;oj;:l
~1::
n",
0-1..
~~
H
Z
n
I~
I~
...,
..
<:
...<:
~[!:
. ...
PI
H'"
'"
n
I~
I~
n
o
z
"'~
;dPl
~~
...'"
0...
"''''
n
o
I~
I:i'
::;.
n
o
'"
'"
0-1
~~
n",
0-1 PI
S'"
'"
I[
H
Z
n
I~
n
~~
......
"''''
"''''
no
....z
...
0",
"''''
o
...'"
'" .
n
I~
... ...
'" '"
o 0
~ 2l
n '"
0-1 ~
~ ...
o
III
co '"
... 0
J. ~
n
;.: 0
'" 0
~ Z
n
~ '"
'" PI
00 ...
,!. ...
o 0
00 '"
, H
g ;;j
;<:
'"
..
'"
....
1::
PI
0-1
:-'
...
~
... ~
:::: ;;j
... ili
'" z
o 0-1
!"
....
...
~
~ ~
~
po
2
....
.
...
~
PI
!"
f"
VI
.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1987
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT 'PPR~Y~OR
NO. Non-Discussion Admin. AGEN
ITEM Appoint RepjCounty I
Solid BY: 1/
NO. 7.~~ste Task Force
BY: vicki Volk
V
The City Council is requested to appoint a representative
to the Anoka County Solid Waste Task Force.
COUNCIL ACTION
C MOTION BY SECOND BY
TO
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
7c
Engineering
R
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM Feasibility Report/
NO. Hawk Ridge
BY: Jin Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution recelvlng
the feasibility report and ording ~~Public Hearing for project
87-23 Hawk Ridge.
Also a petition has been received for the remainder of Hawk Ridge.
A resolution declaring the adequacy of the petition is requested
to be approved.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY .REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF STREET CONSTRUCTION,
PROJECT NO. 87-23 IN THE l79th AVENUE, ARROWHEAD STREET, CROCUS
STREET AND ZION STREET, AREA OF HAWK RIDGE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated May 15,
1987, requesting the construction of improvements, specifically
street construction in the following described area: 179th Avenue,
Crocus Street, Zion Street, and Arrowhead Street; and
WHEREAS, the City has received a additional petition for street
improvements for 179th Avenue, Arrowhead Street, Crocus Street and
Zion Street.
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the
signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners
requesting such improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared as adequate for the entire
Hawk Ridge subdivision.
2. The proposed improvement is, hereby referred to BRA and they
are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
,l9____
voting in
with Councilmen
favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON
IMPROVEMENTS OF STREET CONSTRUCTION, PROJECT NO. 87-23 IN THE HAWK RIDGE
ADDITION AREA.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 111-87, adopted the 7th day of
July, 1987, a Feasibility Report has been prepared by BRA for the improve-
ment of street construction, Project No. 87-23 in the Hawk Ridge Addition
area; and
WHEREAS, such report was~received by the City Council on the 1st
day of September, 1987; and
WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be feasibile
for an estimated cost of $
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibililty Report for
Project No. 87-23, for the improvements of street construction
in the Hawk Ridge Addition area as prepared by BRA.
2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance with
the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated cost of the improvement
of $
3 .
A Public Hearing shall
the day of
of the City Hall at
and published notice of
by law.
be held on such proposed improvement on
, 19 , in the Council Chambers
P.M. and the Clerk shall give mailed
such hearing and improvement as required
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting in
favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM
NO.
Budget 7d
BY:James E. Schrantz
September 1, 1987
APPROVE~
AGENDA
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to receive the proposed 1988 budget.
Attached is a printout of the budget Summary for Revenues and
Expenditures.
The Budget as shown includes Bond indebtedness and Certificates of
indebtedness of which the sirens, water trunk, fire van and
computer are the main items.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
ESTIMATED LEVY AND MILL
RATE FOR 1988
1,013,489
Proposed
Levy Amount
60,375,286
Assessed
Valuation
158,320
Estimated Fiscal
Disparity Contribution
2,186,562
Estimated Contribution
Fiscal Disparity
=
14,58 mills*
Estimated mill rate
for 1988
*Adjustment will be made for T.I.F. that information is not
available at this time.
Possibly 0.1 to 0.2 mills
o
CITY OF ANDOVER. MINNESOTA
o
ASSESSED VALUATIONS. TAX LEVIES AND MILL RATES
(shown by year of tax collectibility)
Taxable valuation
1984 1985 1987 J1g-~
$43 .692 .054 $43.752.681 $46.379.188 $54.442,470 W,375,zJ;~ .,
0.656.156) 0.696.653) 0.736.037) (2,000,729) ~,/~I ~t7...
6.767.570 8.285.364 8.492.419 10.411.278 I}, 3iBr (J ~ 0
548.803.468 $50.341.392 553.135.570 562.853.019 6~ 53',72-'1
Asses.ed valuations
Contribution to fiscal
dhparities pool
Distribution from fiscal
dhparities pool
Tax levies
Revenue
General obligation debt
$ 530,144 $ 590.596 $ 664.930 $ 742.563 ~~O, 1.1/1
115.366 100.661 137.903 135.598 I5'J" 'LVS
I O/3,1-'iJ9
'~""~-;:J';~''''''ifF~,':;:j'):'':
.,", . .'- '",:!-"~.~:~,,fti(,,"";~; . -;~~,
11.038 11 . D6 8 11.997 11.747 12.3t;B
2.402 1.887 2.488 2.145 2.Z0
8. <t3 14. ~
13.440 12.955 14.485 l~ .8~2 Slf
Kill rates
Revenue
General obligation debt
o
81
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTIQN .
NQ Non-D1scuss1on 7e
DATE
ORIGJNATINl;> DEPARTMENT
Eng1neer1ng
September 1, 1987
ITEM
NO.
v
Feasibili ty
BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to review the attached cost
apportionment. using two (2) projects, North of 177th Avenue
using front footage as the unit and South of 177th Avenue using
area (acres) as the unit.
(See August 18th packet item Ge)
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
86-5 HANSON BLVD. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT BASED ON AREA
AREA/ COST/ PROPOSED
0 ACRES ACRE ASSESSMENT
9 Bayers 35.30 x 181. 02 = 6390
7 Aasness 33.93 6142
0 ------ 39.00 7060
8 Aasness 35.85 6490
6 Osman 40.44 7320
2 D. Kuiken 75.08 13590
D. Kuiken
5 Buescher 67.24 12172
4 58.30 10553
1 J. Kuiken 71. 24 12896
3 Hoffman 89.40 16183
Hoffman
11 J. Kuiken 37.04 6705
12 Glatt 9 1629
9 Audette 72.78 13175
10 J. Kuiken
13 Johnson 30.37 5498
14 Walker 9.04 1636
704 acres $127,439
127,442
704 Ac
=
$181.02/acre
o
86-5 HANSON BLVD PROPOSED ASSESSMENT BASED ON FRONT FOOTING
FRONT COST/ PROPOSED
0 FOOTAGE FF ASSESSMENT
15 Orr 555 $10.61 $ 5888
16 Orr 210 2228
17 Orr 1800 19098
8 Britton 305 3236
7 Bradley 300 3183
6 Arntzen 300 3183
5 Korkiak 300 3183
4 Bradley 330 3501
3 O'Brien 330 3501
2 Skwark 330 3501
1 Aker 300 3183
5060 $53685
53,662
5060
c
=
$10.61/Front Foot
o
o
FEASIBILITY REPORT
HANSON BOULEVARD
PROJECT NO. 86-5
CSAH 20 TO CR 58
Scope of Improvement
This project is a joint project between the City of Andover and
the County of Anoka. The city is financially responsible for the
right-of-way acquisition and Anoka County if financially
responsible for the construction and maintenance of the project.
Assessment Policy
The city's assessment policy provides that where the city's MSA
funds are used on an MSA street or County State Aid Highway, the
cost of the right-of-way will be assessed to the benefitting
properties. The project north of 177th Avenue is not MSA. No MSA
funds are available.
Estimated Costs
The cost of the right-of-way acquisition is as follows:
Condemnation Cost
$l72,283
Engineering
2,000
5,100
l,720
$181,103
Administration
Assessing
The lands abutting the improvement are all zoned residential. The
estimated costs are based on appraised values.
Two formulas are presented for Council's consideration: (l)
equivalent front footage based on a benefit factor reflections
soil conditions and (2) front footage method.
~
~~
~
.....
~
.
~ ~- ~,~ : -
..r ~
4T~$ -:: ,
"S ~."r'.' ~.
E( 'e " .
OV' s'
I
. I -:-z..
I
I
I
<d . -.'
r.-: <i.'~' ~,: :
":.'~p.~....
\' ;..J.~. ..~ '.. 'J(m
'\ ~/~50':' ~O.' r I't!
\~
ITY~-~
~,/
,-'-'~-
<=
~
~.,~~. ~'
,.r-,.- ~,-.
S; ,.-.,,~,
'-'10"''''-'''''::''
.~ ...'<-:. ": ,.
ULJ
.-c--' '- _.
0 .
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I :
o'
o
..
e!
--H
= --
=
,
-:
,
~
;;;~ ..
'<:.~
-
.
.;
I
-
I
Ihl I
-_ f- \ I
\~I ". I
I I' (~; \.CD I
J---1
-
n::
"" :~
,'-..,
, '--.
"--~
--~:~
I ; ---.......
I
7
\/r-'
-/~7
1~V
---.-!:.....
I
:
I
I
:?-\
1 ~
.to"~1-
~Ofi
:,,:;::
-
'4 '
<
1.
.~.
t. ::;t:.'- '.
.. ,.,t.~__ -'--.
, ..~,.,u-.~
.:j. A no/(o. -= CO. HJ;
o .;. ~-
~ -. -, :.~,,:-) -:, ~ .
Rlw . .;;; ..!ij!':
./,..ifi'~l
............,
"
! I !
,
I I
itt' -
! I
. i I
,
:
.
....
..'
) ..
\1
:}
.- '-:.:.~-~is~~~
,- ,-i.~
1::
~-
o~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Seotember 1. lqR7
ITEM
NO.
8
BY:
Vicki Volk
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Approval of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
Special Meeting July 15, 1987
Regular Meeting July 21, 1987 (Knight Absent)
Special Meeting July 28, 1987
Regu,lar Meeting August 4, 1987
Special Meeting August 11, 1987
Regular meeting August 18, 1987
Special Closed Meeting August 18, 1987
NOTE: The minutes of July 7, 1987 were previously approved but
contain an error. Under Approval of Claims, the total
amount of the claims should have been $168,429.74 instead
of $168,483.74.
Council should formally amend these minutes.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
--., ~
Ie
Jf/~ Cf~1 PJJa/k :7~ %
DIVISION OF DONOV AN COMPANIES. INC.
/- --
\. c
q!/!?7
/ I
I
1080 MONTREAL AVE. . ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55116
August 31, 1987
The Honorable Jerry Windschitl
Mayor of Andover and City Council
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Anoka, MN 55303
Dear Mayor Windschitl and Council Members:
Beginning with bills issued on or after September 1, 1987, North
Central Public Service Co. will be decreasing the natural gas
rates in your area. This change is necessary to offset the
decrease in the wholesale cost of gas we have received from
Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern), our supplier in your
service area.
Northern's decrease reflects the impact of seasonal and
competitive forces in the market demand for gas; resulting in a
net decrease to North Central's Firm customers. North Central
will be decreasing all Firm rates for natural gas by 2.0 cents
per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) effective with gas usage on and
after September 1, 1987. This represents an approximate decrease
of $2.32 annually to the average residential space heating
customer, or expressed as a percentage of decrease, about (.48%).
If you have any questions concerning these adjustments, we will
be happy to discuss them with you.
Very truly yours,
NORTH CENTRAL PUBLIC SERVICE CO.
Division of Iowa Public Service Company
~'
~. ... ,~
~."~
Rates & Tariffs
TDE/kmf
'M2'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
ITEM
NO.
James E. Schrantz
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Handout
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to review, comment and approve
as is or with recommendation the attached goals, philosophy,
and policies for the Lower Rum River Water Management Organi-
zation. .
Each of the (4) four member'City's are reviewing the goals,
philosophy, and policies.
These goals, etc... will be part of the water Management
Organizations Comprehensive Plan.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
GOALS, PHILOSOPHY AND POLICIES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 23, 1986
( .
The philosophy, goals, and policies of the Lower Rum River WMO were
developed after an examination of existing conditions and trends identified.
in the inventory and analysis process. These goals and policies serve to
direct the development of projects that impact water resources in the
Watershed.
As with all planning tools, the material presented here is meant to be
dynamic and to evolve with changing conditions in the watershed. However,
amendments and improvements will be made only to reflect new trends and
general conditions and not on a case-by-case basis.
Philosophy
The administrative philosophy of the WMO is based on the
responsibilities imposed by the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act.
The WMO will deal with all forms of water resources within its boundaries
and will manage those resources with attention to the watershed as a
whole,
The WMO also believes that changing relationships among agencies,
municipalities, and individuals affect water resources management on a
watershed basis, and that the WMO is needed to deal with conflicts which
can frequently occur. The organization will expend financial resources as
needed to improve or correct particular water-related problems. The WMO
may use its authority pursuant to the JPA to alleviate water management
problems that transcend municipal boundaries and to resolve problems that
cannot be resolved by the municipalities involved.
1
Goals
A "goal" is a desired end toward which the WHO policies, standards,
criteria, and rules are directed. Under this definition, the organization
has nine specific goals to guide its water resources planning and
management functions:
1.
Plan for future development and growth so as to minimize
with water and related land resources and to optimize the
of living for residents in the watershed
problems
quality
2. Maintain or improve water quality in all protected and managed
water resources within the watershed
3. Reduce to the greatest practical extent the pub~ic capital
expenditures and maintenance costs needed to control volumes and
rates of stormwater runoff
4. Minimize flooding, erosion and sedimentation
(
5. Manage groundwater recharge
6, Preserve wildlife habitat areas of significant value
7.
Preserve and improve water
facilities
recreational
opportunities
and
8, Maintain and improve all existing natural and artificial water
courses
9. Maintain a current inventory of water resources and water quality
data.
2
Policies
The WMO recognizes that the primary authority for the determination of
land use rests with the local municipality. In those areas of activity
where both the WMO and the municipalities have authority, WMO policy is to
refrain from action where the municipalities are willing and able to.
perform. The WMO believes municipalities are best able to control
development and insure compliance with the WMO's overall water management
plan, particularly through their established engineering departments,
building departments, and planning commissions. (See Appendix B for
regulations relating to standards and design criteria,)
Administration
1, The WMO will review its management plan and its implementation
regulations periodically to ensure that it is consistent with current
legislation and that it reflects the current goals of the WMO,
municipalities, counties, and soil and water conservation districts,
2.
The WMO will from time to time review and, if
Capital Improvements Program and submit it for
public groups and individuals.
necessary,
review to
update the
appropriate
Regulation
l. The WMO will maintain regulatory authority over all development that
might affect water resources until local plans and regulations are
adopted that are consistent with the WMO Water Management Plan.
2. After local plans are adopted, the WMO will continue to exercise water
resources management responsibilities in intermunicipal issues or
whenever water quality can be affected in the watershed's protected and
managed water resources or in storm sewer trunk conveyor systems.
3
3. The WHO's regulatory approach will place the primary regulatory
responsibility with municipalities, but the WHO shall maintain an
active regulatory role in areas of the WHO's interest,
Inter~overnmental Relations/Institutional Arran~ements
1. To ensure compliance with appropriate ordinances, standards, criteria,
and policies, the WHO will maintain open communication and will
cooperate and coordinate with all governments in implementing,
reviewing, and regulating development within the watershed.
2. The WHO will review local water management plans to assess their effect
on the overall water and related land resources of the watershed.
3. The WHO recognizes that the design and construction of municipal storm
drainage systems should remain the function of municipal government.
Planning
1, All local surface water management plans and programs should include
coordinated multi-use management practices and must be consistent with
the WHO management plan.
2. The WHO encourages early planning for sparsely developed areas of the
watershed to maximize the effectiveness of stormwater runoff and water
quality controls and to reduce the long-term costs of water
management.
3.
The WHO will manage its water
development of the watershed as
comprehensive plans.
resources based on the ultimate
reflected in current municipal
4. The WHO's management plan should be consistent with the Metropolitan
Council and its supporting metropolitan system plans,
4
Financing
1. The WHO will consider the use of all available authorities and
resources to finance the water management features of the watershed.
2. In deciding whether or not to finance a project, the WHO will consider
project needs, benefit/cost relationships, administrative costs,
efficiency, funds collection, and the impact on residents of the
watershed and the benefitted area.
3.
The WHO may facilitate financing for water
improvements to protected water resources and
conveyance systems.
quantity
to storm
and quality
sewer trunk
Water Oualitv
1. The organization will seek to maintain or improve the overall water
quality of water resources within the watershed.
(
2. The WHO will seek to achieve water quality levels for water resources
consistent with applicable State and Federal water quality standards.
3. Water quality will be maintained at the highest level consistent with a
responsible economic benefit/cost relationship.
4. The WHO will maintain water quality data records.
5. The WHO discourages the use of septic tanks and soil adsorption systems
where municipal sewer is available. However, if no other alternative
exists, such systems can be installed and maintained if they are
consistent with the standards and regulations adopted by the Minnesota
Pollution Control-Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health.
5
6.
Whenever practical, storm sewers will be
before discharging to lakes and streams
directly into lakes or streams).
routed to
(rather
detention
than being
basins
routed
Stormwater Runoff
1.
The WHO encourages the optimal use of lakes,
throughout the watershed for storing stormwater
water quality and related amenities.
ponds,
runoff
and
and
wetlands
improving
2. The WHO encourages and will assist in planning for the retainment of as
much precipitation as possible on and in the soil. Temporary surface
storage facilities and infiltration techniques will be used wherever
practical.
3. Stormwater management improvements will be designed based on the
critical storm event for the drainage area.
4. Subwatershed discharge rates and flood storage volumes shall be
maintained to be consistent with the management plan.
5. The WHO recognizes that runoff volume will increase with further
development of the watershed; however, the WHO will require that peak
runoff rates be kept below the capacity of downstream conveyance
facilities by use of a regional detention management approach.
Draina~ewav Maintenance
1.
Member-municipalities will maintain
structures between protected and
coordination with the WHO.
waterways
managed
and water management
water resources in
6
F1oodin~
1. Local units of government, in cooperation with the WHO and other
involved agencies, will manage development based on the lOO-year flood
level on all open channels, storm sewer overflow areas, depressions,
wetlands, and lakes.
2. The WHO may establish regional lOO-year flood elevations based on
critical storm events on the water bodies within the watershed.
3. The WHO may consider mitigating measures during its review and
.f permitting process for development within a floodplain.
4. The lowest floor elevation of all development shall be required to be
at least 1 foot above the lOO-year flood level for the adjacent water
body.
5. Stormwater conveyance systems shall be designed to ensure flood
protection for the drained area and for all receiving water resources
downstream.
Wetlands
1. Wetlands that are tributary to a protected water resource and that
perform a beneficial water quality function will be maintained in their
natural condition or improved to provide more benefits for water
quality management, with consideration for other amenities.
2. Wetland alteration may be allowed in Types 1, 2, and 6 wetlands only if
it is determined that the alteration will not impair the necessary
water quality function of the wetland, will not eliminate required
storage within th~ watershed, and will not adversely affect the
aesthetics of the area and any significant wildlife habitat.
3. The WHO will generally preserve the wetland habitat and hydrologic
function of Types 3, 4, and 5 wetlands of 2-1/2 acres or more.
7
. ,
4. Wetland relocation within a development or watershed unit may be
considered if the wetland to be relocated is less than 2-1/2 acres and
if it is re-established as a comparable type of wetland. In making
this decision, the WHO and municipalities will generally consider
storage volume, water quality, aesthetics, and wildlife habitat.
Groundwater
1. The WHO encourages sound, contemporary land use development that
incorporates grassed open spaces to allow infiltration of precipitation
in all land use categories.
2. The WHO encourages the use of facilities to enhance groundwater
infiltration whenever possible and practical.
3.
Land use
endanger
and development within
groundwater quality or
the watershed should not
impair groundwater recharge.
knowingly
(
Recreation. Open Space. and Wildlife
1. The WHO will seek to apply a multi-use management approach to the water
resources of the watershed, considering the benefits and effects of all
activities not only on water resources, but also on recreation, open
space, and wildlife.
2. The WHO will seek opportunities to develop or improve recreational,
open space, and wildlife facilities.
LRRGPP/343,0
8
~
TKDA
ToOL TZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. 'NCORPORA TED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUl. MINNESOTA 55101.1893
6121292-4400
FAX 612/292-0083
August 19, 1987
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
Re: Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 7379-007
Dear Mayor and Council:
The fol lowIng are engineering matters discussed and the action taken by the
City Council at the regular Council meeting held on August 18, 1987:
1. Public Hearing - Prolects 87-10 and 87-11
A public hearing to review the Improvements to the City sanitary sewer
trunk system and water source and storage system was held. The
projects rei ated to the follow I ng:
A. Project 87-10 (Commission No. 8929) was for the water wel I and
pumphouse No.3 to be located within HII Is of Bunker Lake 2nd
Addition.
B. Prolect 87-11 (Commission No. 8932) was for the trunk sanitary
sewer and trunk watermaln to be extended to the new elementary
school south of the City Hal I offices.
Mr. John Rodeberg, P.E., did review the project In detail relating to
area and connection charges within the MUSA service boundary. Area
charges "only" wll I be levied In 1987 for 1988 tax collection.
Connection charges wll I be assessed at the time of development within
the area or as petitions for lateral benefit are received and acted
upon. The area assessments for 1987 were presented as fol lows:
Area Sewer Charge = $831/Acre
Area Water Charge = $885/Acre
Council Action
The Council passed a resolution to consolidate Projects 87-10 and 87-
11 and ordered Improvements to be made.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
August 19, 1987
Page Two
2. Creekside Estates - Preliminary Plat, ProJect 87-28 (Commission No.
8897 - Woodrldge)
The Council received the Planning and Zoning Commission report and
approved the Preliminary Plat of Creekside Estates. The Plat was
approved with a 46.5 foot surfaced radius cul-de-sac; a 48 foot right-
Of-way radius; a 10 foot utility and drainage easement adjacent
thereto.
3. Oak Bluff 2nd Addition Rezoning, Sketch Plan and Vacation of Easement
The Council held over the action to rezone to the meeting of September
1,1987. The developer Is to consider transition lot sizing to relate
to existing large lot developments adjacent to the proposed plat.
4. The Oaks - Petition for Improvements. ProJect 87-29 (Commission No.
8915 - Shady Knoll)
A petition signed by 100% of the owners of lots within the Oaks
Addition was received.
The Council, by resolution, received the petition and waived the
public hearing as requested by 100% of the owners.
The Council received the Feasibility Report and ordered Plans and
Specifications for the Project to be completed as a change order to
Project 87-7 (Commission No. 8915 - Shady Knol I).
5. Colonial Creek, ProJect 87-27. Commission No. 8998
The Council received the Feasibility Report for Project 87-27
(Commission No. 8998) and waived the publ Ie hearing as requested by
the owners of 100% of the property to be Improved.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
August 19, 1987
Page Three
6. Commercial Park, ProJect 87-6. Commission No. 8840
The Council, by resolution, approved the Plans and Specifications for
complete Grading of Phase I of the Commercial Park and Verdin Street
adjacent thereto.
Bids wll I be received September 18, 1987, to be awarded by the Counell
at a special meeting the week of September 22, 1987.
Davidson, P.E.
JLD:j
.
III
II
II
III
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
II
I
I
,
I
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
0110 O. IkMnlf'OO, P.E.
/1_ W. /I""".. P.t.,
'_ C. A_,t. P.t:
~0IfI A. LlMbH,. P.t..
IIk_ E. T....... P.E.
'- C. 0II0It. P.E.
o
2335 w. r,unk Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
612.636-4600
Engineers & Architects
August 13, 1987
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of And.over
1685 Crosst.own B.oulevard N.W.
Andover, MN 55303
Re: Hawk Ridge
Street Improvements
Project No. 87-23
Our File 17128
Dear Mayor and C.ouncil:
Glrlflf R. Cook. P.E.
II:r;11I A. GonJu". P./:.',
TII~ 1::. Nuyr~. P.I:.:
Ilklt'''d W. fast", P.E.
llobHl G. Scltll,,;dll, P.b',
M/lnin L. SorwIIII. P.E.
00M/d C. B.'.."dl. P.E.
'''''' A. _.. P.E.
M...t A. H_ P.E.
T'" K. Fir/d. P.E.
Mit:IttwIT.ltllMlIfNI1IIf,P,E.
It." N. PlrJJrrlc-. /1./;',
[)g~id O. Ludulll, P.J:,",
Tlloma W. Pr/~. P.I:.',
MiclwNl C. LyIfCIf. P./;',
KII#WI L. Willis. P.E.
Jllmn R. MII/QIfd. P.E.
Kenllr'" P. Antknun. P.E.
Krillt A. .u:IIHlQnn. P.I:.
Murk R. Rolfs. P.E.
Ro~" C. IllLSkk. A./.A.
ThOltUlS E. An,us, P.I:.',
$mll L. rUtm,. P.I::.
C/ulr/n A. EridcUJIf
bo M. PQwIsky
Htlrllm M. 04uII
S,"""M.ENrl;tI
Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the c.onstruction of resi-
dential streets within the Hawk Ridge Addition. The report provides a detail
cost estimate of the work being considered and a plan of the area.
We would be pleased t.o meet with the City Council and Staff at any mutually
convenient time to review any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
4L 1(4
Glenn R. Cook
GRC:ci
Ene 1.
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervisi.on and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws .of the State .of Minnesota.
~~~~
Glenn R. C.o.ok
Date: Au~ust 13, 1987
Reg. No. 9451
602ge
.-....
.
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
DISCUSSION
PROJECT COSTS AND ASSESSMENTS
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX
FIGURE #1 - STREET CONSTRUCTION
A-602ge
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
- 2 -
.
I
I
I
II
II
II
I
II
II
II
III
II
II
II
II
I
-
-
INTRODUCTION
The City of Andover has requested a preliminary rep.ort to determine the
feasibility of constructing residential streets within the Hawk Ridge Addi-
ti.on. The City received a petition from the residence in the area requesting
that a feasibility rep.ort be prepared. The prop.osed street improvements are
shown on Figure 1 at the back of this rep.ort.
The existing roadways consist of native sand and contaminated gravel and
are 24 to 28 feet in width. The proposed street would consist of a 24 fo.ot
wide paved surface with 2' sh.oulders. The secti.on would consist of 4 inches
of Class 5, aggregate base and 2 inches of bituminous surfacing. This section
is the standard for the City of Andover. A cul-de-sac is being proposed at
the west end of l17th Lane.
Soil borings have not been taken for this proposed roadway, but field
investigati.on indicated a fine sand subgrade material.
The st.orm water run-off presently drains t.o the shall.ow road ditches and
l.ow areas and percolates into this s.oil.
There are existing driveway and
street culverts which will be utilized for drainage purposes.
- 3 -
A-602 ge
.
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
III
I
III
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
DISCUSSION
The c.onstruction of the streets will consist of shaping the roadway to the
design grade and crown and the placement of 4 inches of Class 5 aggregate base
and 2 inches of 2341 bituminous surfacing. The street will be constructed as
a rural section and be paved 24 wide with a 2 foot shoulder on each side. The
storm water will be c.ontrolled in the existing ditches.
The proposed street section will be constructed over the existing surface
resulting in an elevation change of about six inches.
The existing driveways will be matched with bituminous surfacing. The
constructi.on of bitumin.ous driveways fr.om the edge of the pavement to the
right-.of-way is included in the cost estimate.
- 4 -
A-602ge
.
I
PROJECT COSTS AND ASSESSMENTS
I
The project costs for the proposed street improvements are outlined in
I
this section.. The itemized cost estimate is pr.ovided in the Appendix and.
I
includes a 5 percent contingency and 20 percent for legal, engineering and
administrati.on. N.o cost have been included for easement acquisition if neces-
I
sary.
The indicated unit prices are as projected for the 1987 construction
I
season (ENR 4460 Mpls.).
I
Area
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Unit C.ost
Units
I
Hawk Ridge
$211,680
39
$5428.00
I
I
There are 39 lots in the subdivision resulting in a c.ost per lot of
$5,428.00. The project c.osts are prop.osed to be assessed to the benefiting
I
pr.operty owners adjacent to the street .on a unit basis.
I
I
I
I
I
I
A-602ge
- 5 -
I
.
I
I
I
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The project as reviewed herein is feasible as it relates to general engi-
neering principals and construction procedures. Based on inf.ormation con-
.
tained in this report, it is recommended that:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A-602ge
I
This rep.ort be ad.opted by the City of And.over as a guide for con-
struction of the street improvements.
The City conduct a legal and fiscal review of the proposed project
prior t.o a public hearing.
A public hearing be held to determine further action to be taken.
The property owner adjacent t.o the r.oadway should be notified for
hearing purp.oses.
The f.o1lowing schedule be implemented for the project.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Receive Preliminary Rep.ort
Hold Public Hearing
Order Plans and Specificati.ons
Approve Plans and Specificati.ons
Bid Date
Award Date
Start Constructi.on
Complete C.onstruction
- 6 -
Sept. I, 1987
Oct.ober 20, 1987
Oct.ober 20, 1987
N.ovember 17, 1987
January 8, 1988
January 19, 1988
May 15, 1988
July 15, 1988
I::
,
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX
COST ESTIMATE
HAWK RIDGE
Unit
Item Unit Price
Sub grade excavation C.Y. 2.00
Class 5 aggregate base T.on 7.50
Class 5 shouldering aggregate T.on 8.00
2341 bitumin.ous wearing course T.on 16.00
AC-l bitumin.ous material for mixture Ton 175.00
Bituminous Patching for driveway T.on 60.00
Seeding with topsoil and mulch Acres 4000.00
+ 5% Contingency
Est.
Quantity
500
6500
500
3500
230
100
3
+ 20% Legal, Engrng., Admin.
TOTAL PROJECT COST
A-602 ge
- 7 -
Est.
Cost
$ 1,000.00
48,750.00
4,000.00
56,000.00
40,250.00
6,000.00
12,000.00
$168,000.00
8,400.00
$176,400.00
35,280.00
$211,680.00
.- -.'~' ......., ,,-, ',..-..~:,,-' ., "-, ~'~ c-, "~-"'-n"',,:,,"!?1~'[_"'.,,;' _,:,_:~:''':'-'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I "
z
,;
~
I ;;;
!!!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
.
g ~
't .
Jl '"
~
~ .
~
.
. III
~ .
ill '"
~ :;
'" "
N U
~z
""<0
(J-
","
.,'"
o
3<i
a::
51
d
.----,
l!
'"
'"
;;
&
0"
~~
~
.
..
g.
;; 5
. .
. ~
= :;
.
.
t
<
f;
'"
..
:z;
:z; -
~l
'"
..
>
o
'"
:z;
<
~l
'IS .'!PJ3A
~~ 'ON pooij Aluno~ )~
=
e
I 0
'"
,;
~
e
o
'N "IS OIOlPOI!)
'"
z
e
.
.
o
....
. "
~
~
~
.
~ ~
'-
e
'"
...
l-
I-
'"
...
"
z
E
~
~
~~
i
~~
~!i
~~
"~
h
o
e~
....
.'.~
.':;. ..,' ,..
.! . ."~
1 . '~
PAUL McCARRON
Anoko County Commissioner
~istrict #6. Fridley
Spring lake Park
MEMO TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CO U N TV
OF
ANOKA
Office of the County Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 553
August 27, 1987
crT'! ('\'7 ^ !\I"''()'/'~''
ID ,
Anoka County Solid Waste Abatement Advisory Task Foree q /11 YJ
Commissioner Paul MeCarron, Chairman,
Anoka County Solid Waste Abatement Advisory Task Foree
September 2, 1987 Organizational Meeting
Attached is additional information for the September 2nd meeting of the Solid
Waste Abatement Advisory Task Foree.
PM:dh
Enclosures
Paul McCarron
Anoka County Commissioner
Office: Suite 103 Commerce Pork Office Building, 7362 University Ave. N.E" Fridley. MN 55432. PHONE: 571.7976
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
~!~"..I
August, 1987
SU,MMARY OF ANOKA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MASTER PLAN
I. Plan follows general guidelines of Metropolitan Council's S.olid Waste Management
Development Guide/Policy Plan (1985).
2. Primary roles and responsibilities:
a. County
(I) Provide for large-scale centralized facilities (e.g., Elk River Resouree
Recovery Projeet RDF facility, landfill inventory site).
(2) Coordinate and foster plan implementation.
(3) Provide assistanee toward local program implementation (i.e., technical
and funding assistance).
(4) Monitor solid waste system effectivenes~ and modify system design and
priorities as needed. . .
(5) Implement in-house waste reduetion and paper recycling program.
(6) Establish abatement objectives for the County and local units .of
government.
(7) Ensure abatement objectives are met.
b. Cities/T ownships
(I) Provide for eurbside collection and/or dropoff programs for reeyclable
materials and yard waste.
(2) . Provide for abatement activities that best suit the needs of their
community in meeting the goals and objeetives of the County Plan and the
Metropolitan Couneil Poliey Plan.
(3) Implement in-house waste reduction and paper recycling programs.
3. General plan approach
a. Integrated solid waste management system which aims t.o maximize abatement
through a variety of cost-effective low-technol.ogy and high-technology meth.ods.
b. System g.oal is to minimize amount of material landfilled and negative
environmental impacts of land disposal.
c. Recycling, yard waste c.omposting, and waste reduction pr.ograms are expeeted
to achieve abatement of 20% of Anoka County's waste stream. About 80% of
the waste stream wi II be processed.
d. Programs and facilities should be flexible, reliable, predictable and stable.
(I)
. C.ounty should ensure that basic RDF /metals recovery system is operating
smoothly before other major processing elements or facilities are added to
the County's solid waste system.
Recycling and yard waste composting efforts shouJd be implemented in a
deliberate manner which leads to full-scale programs whieh maximize cost-
effective abatement. Efforts should focus on a limited number of
recyclable materials whieh represent significant elements of the waste
stream, have reliable markets, and/or can be separated and prepared for
recycling relatively easily.
(2)
(3)
Reliable long-term funding is essential for local programs. A portion of
c.osts should be paid with regional and County funding mechanisms. When
the RDF facility c.ommenees operation in mid-1989, the C.ounty's share of
local program costs will be funded from a portion of the dumping fee for
haulers at the RDF facility.
e. County-provided technical assistanee and eoordination will be imp.ortant in
helping communities and businesses implement waste reduction, recyeling and
composting programs. County is providing full-time staff to coordinate and
provide assistance to public education, waste reduction, residential and
commercial/industrial/institutional recycling, and yard waste eomposting
programs.
f. The Anoka County S.olid Waste Abatement Advisory Task Force, eomposed of
representatives from each c.ommunity, the An.oka County Solid Waste
Management Advisory C.ommittee, the Anoka County Board, and County staff, is
the primary vehicle for coordinating local and County "low-tech" abatement
efforts. The maj.or purposes of the Task Force are t.o foster co.operation among
local units of government, clarify roles and resp.onsibilities and share information
on abatement issues, such as types of programs, methods for c.ollection,
eontracts, monitoring, g.oals, cooperative marketing, end use marketing, public
education, funding and other "low-tech" abatement issues and to eommunicate
with the An.oka County Board of Commissioners. The Task Force will provide
input into the development of the County's reeycling implementation strategy in
1988, in which a variety .of issues will be examined to ensure that abatement
objectives are met.
4. Specific Plan Elements
a. Residential Recycling
(I) Initial f.ocus on pil.ot-dem.onstration pr.ograms for c.ollection (urban areas)
and drop-off (rural and urban areas) of newspapers, glass and aluminum
(additional materials optional), primarily from single-family dwellings.
(2) Cities/townships to provide for at least pi l.ot eollection/drop-off serviee by
1989. County to provide technical and funding assistance.
(3) Local pr.ograms initially should include marketing of materials. With input
from the Task Force, the County will explore cooperative
2
. marketing/intermediate pr.ocessing of recyclable materials fr.om local
programs in the recycling implementation strategy.
(4) Citiesltownships to establish programs for multi-unit e.omplexes once
single-family programs are in operation.
b. Yard Waste Compostinq
(J) A joint effort will be undertaken to expand yard waste c.omposting sites in
the County. The County will expand the Bunker Hills site, develop the
Rice Creek/Chain of Lakes site with area communities, work with
eommunities and farmers in rural areas to try to develop local sites, and
work with cities and any interested private parties to possibly develop
additional sites. The County will also try to coordinate efforts to expand
markets for compost.
(2) Cities/t.ownships to provide for curbside collecti.on .or satellite dropoff
composting sites or temp.orary depots for dropoff of yard waste and pick-up
of compost by 1989.
(3) County to provide technical and funding assistance.
c. Commercial/Industrial Recyclinq (including government and other institutions)
(I) County to provide technical assistance to interested businesses and
institutions to implement recycling/reduction programs, with priority
initially for larger waste generators and multi-tenant complexes.
(2) Emphasis on cardboard, office paper, glass.
(3) County and local units of g.overnment including seho.ol districts to
implement in-house paper recycling programs.
d. Househ.old Hazard.ous Waste
(I) Anoka C.ounty will work with other metropolitan c.ounties to review and
evaluate pilot h.ousehold hazard.ous waste c.ollecti.on pr.ograms and t.o
explore a household hazardous waste management concept.
e. Waste Reduction
(I) County t.o coordinate public education eff.orts, including program t.o
encourage backyard yard waste composting and mulching of grass clippings.
(2) C.ounty and local units .of government, including schools and other
institutions, to initiate paper reducti.on/recycling programs in their offices.
(3) County and local units of government to examine pr.oeurement p.olieies
regarding purchase .of recyclable goods, go.ods made fr.om recyclable
materials, and longer-lasting materials.
f. Waste-to-Enerqy/Materials Recovery/Co-Comp.osting
3
(I) County to implement activities related to the Elk River Resource
Recovery Project for which the County is responsible and to work with the
Resouree Reeovery Operations Committee to ensure cooperation among
participating counties.
(2) County to work with Ramsey-Washington Counties and NSP t.o examine
feasibility of eo-composting, and to provide for implementati.on of co-
e.omposting project, if appropriate.
(3) County to monitor and evaluate emerging technologies and private
processing pr.oposals, to provide for adequate processing capacity to
acc.omm.odate future growth in the C.ounty, and to w.ork with NSP to
implement methods of reducing landfill needs ass.ociated with RDF project
(e.g., ash re-use), where appr.opriate.
g. Landfill Disp.osal
(I) County to pursue landfill inventory siting proeess for as l.ong as new
capacity is required and inventory sites are potentially permittable.
(2) County to eontinue to license and regulate solid waste facilities.
(3) County to continue to monitor remedial investigations/feasibility studies at
landfill disposal sites in the County.
h. Transfer 5 tation
(I) County to eontinue to examine the need for a transfer station in
c.onjunetion with RDF project, and to pursue purchase .of a site in the
designated area in the City .of Blaine, which may also be used for a
citizens' waste drop.off faci lity or an intermediate reeycling pr.ocessing
faci li ty.
4
Priorities
1987 - 1992
During the initial 1987-1992 five-year time period of this plan, the following priorities are
establ ished:
HIGH PRIORITY
An.oka County
Ensure abatement .objectives are met.
Implement Anoka C.ounty's resp.onsibilities with regard to devel.opment and operation
of the Elk River Resouree Rec.overy Pr.oject.
Provide full-time staff to coordinate and provide assistance to public education, waste
reduction, residential and commercial/industrial/institutional recyeling, and yard
waste eomposting programs.
Coordinate expansion of waste reduction/source separati.on efforts thr.ough the Solid
Waste Abatement Advisory Task Force and provide technical assistance and assist in
establishing stable funding sources for local source separati.on programs.
Work jointly with cities, townships, farmers and interested private parties in
devel.oping and operating yard waste composting sites, including disposal areas f.or
brush.
Initiate an offiee paper reducti.on/recycling program f.or County .offices.
Coordinate public education pr.ograms.
Pursue landfill inventory siting process for as long as new capacity is required and
inventory sites are p.otentially permittable.
Cities and Townships
Provide for curbside collection of recyclables (not including yard waste) in urbanized
areas, and drop-off centers thr.ough.out the County.
Pr.ovide f.or curbside colleetion .of yard waste in urbanizedareas, and drop-off centers
.or depots where curbside eollecti.on is not available at least bi-weekly through.out the
growing season.
Initiate an office paper reducti.on/recycling program.
5
SECONDARY PRIORITY
Anoka County
Assess feasibility of co-comp.osting in conjunction with resource rec.overy project.
Expl.ore development of eooperative marketing f.or recyclable materials from loeal
programs, including intermediate processing.
Provide technical assistance to businesses and institutions interested in waste
reducti.on/recycling with pri.ority initially for larger waste generators and multi-tenant
complexes.
Examine C.ounty .pr.ocurement policies regarding purchase .of recyclable goods, go.ods
made fr.om recyclable materials, and longer-lasting goods.
Cities and T .ownships
Examine procurement policies regarding purchase .of recyclable goods, g.oods made
from reeyclable materials, and longer-lasting goods.
Establish recycling pr.ogram in multi-unit eomplexes.
Pr.ovide for additional abatement aetivities which best suit the needs of the
community.
1992 - 2000
During the 1992-2000 peri.od, the solid waste system will have matured fr.om a system
primarily dependent on landfill disp.osal to a system which uses landfill disp.osal essentially
only as a means .of last res.ort. Eff.orts during the 1992-2000 peri.od will focus .on improving
existing waste reducti.on, reeycling and yard waste composting programs, .on evaluating
emerging waste management techniques and technologies, on implementing meth.ods to
decrease landfill disp.osal needs associated with the RDF pr.oject, and .on pr.oviding f.or
sufficient processing capacity to aecomm.odate potential waste due to residential and
business growth in the County.
6
.......
~
2
>-
""j
"
~
&I
c..
~
~
I/')~
~o
-E
~2
u~
~v;
~~
~:
ic
>-..
g~
0';:
U'O
~
..
c:
&I
U
~
&I
c..
e i
..
t
~
&I
c..
...J
a:l
<
~
~-
~~
u~
t
~
'ig'
N._
:':::1
o &I
~ts
41 ~
uo..
~
&1.-
U"
~ 0
~ ~
1/')8-
&I
I/')
~
&1.-
....
S g
~'i
a::
>-
.. -
c: 0
~o
u~
'ig'
N._
:'::::1
o 41
~ts
&I ~
uc..
S
&1.-
U"
~ 0
~ ~
I/')!
I/')
8
&1'-
....
:1
a::
o 0
o 0
M
r-
0-0
o 0
o 0
U') M
U') <Xl
o 0
o 0
<Xl <Xl
~
..::r '"
o 0
o U')
M ..::r
o U')
. .
~
r- <Xl
cp cp
N
o
o
'"
.::t
o
o
o
LI)
0'-
<Xl
o
o
M
o
o
<Xl
C"'l
\.0
LI)
'"
<Xl
..::r
o
.
\.0
o
N
0'-
cp
o
o
.::t
'"
r--
'"
..
o
o
LI)
C"'l
LI)
o
o
N
r-
o
o
r--
~
LI)
N
0'-
...
..
o
<Xl
o
0'-
o
.
C"'l
o
C7'
8
C"")
..::r
<Xl
...
..
o
o
LI)
C"'l
LI)
o
C>
C"")
N
o
o
r--
r-
\.0
0'-
..
...
o
co
o
N
o
.::t
0'-
o
o
co
N
0'-
...
...
o
o
LI)
C"'l
LI)
o
o
0'-
N
o
o
r--
0'-
0'-
0'-
..
...
0'-
r--
o
LI)
o
.
LI)
N
0'-
8
..::r
o
0'-
LI)
...
...
..
o
o
C"")
N
r--
..::r
o
o
\.0
<Xl
co
o
o
LI)
0'-
N
o
o
...
...
...
o
<Xl
...
...
...
o
CXl
o
LI)
o
LI)
o
o
LI)
LI)
LI)
0'-
0'-
8
N
I
\.0
0'-
I
C"'l
0'-
o
8
N
o
..
...
..
o
o
'"
0'-
o
CXl
o
c..'
CXl
LI)
o
o
'"
o
LI)
o
o
-0
~
U
~
o
!.L
o
0:
..
c:
o
a.
0\
c:
I/)
I/)
Q)
g
...
a.
E
o
...
-
I/)
o
~
-0
I/)
Q)
0:
>-
-
0'-
CXl
0'-
u
o .
--
!.Lor.
0'2'
0:: ~
-
o >-
-o~
Q) Q)
1/)-
III I/)
Q) 0
u :I:
o
... 0\
o.c
Q) E
.Ll 0
_ U
.~ .!:
...
15 0
Q)'&.
>-N
~C"'l
a.;
I/) 0
>-.Ll
o 0
" 0
r-- _
00.
C"'l ~
X ;..
>-0
0-
"0
... '"
Q) 0
0.0.
CI).~
5"
-=
0:;:
0-0
LI) C
I/) 0
Q) Q)
E ...
~'5
'" CT
< &I
... ...
...
-
o
Q)
C
~
...,
0\
c:
...
~
"
C
o
-
o
...
Q)
a.
o
c:
Q)
.Ll
:I:
>-
-
u
o
...
!.L
o
0::
Q)
or.
-
-
o
or.
-
]
E
~
'"
'"
<
...
'"
~
a.
41
'"
~
I
>-~
-
'u -g
o 0
0.0\
8.~
0\-
.~ ~
1/)0.
'" E
g 8
0.0
_u
0_
c: 0
o or.
.- -
-
:0]
"-
o 0
_a.
0'-
or. .~
- -
-0 C
c: 0
o.~
~~ .
> -0
~ .~
4IE:=
_ 0...
~Q)"
o ... c
.= ~12
OQ)Q)
--...
oS 0
2:-:1:-5
ilJ!:C
C:-:I:
0_ I/)
III 0-
o 0
(l) .....-
... 41 ...
... -0 Q)
.- c-o
Q)'-
or.OE
- E
" Q)"
Q)'-~
or. Q) I/)
u or. Q)
o-u
~Q)~
Q)Oo.
>,,-
000
or.E-
'" E c:
~ 05
'';: U E
o go
c
... 0 Q)
4I_or.
- -
0>-41
>-15U
O\I/)~
o ","
-4I~
o U
C:410
or. c:-
u_-o
41._ 41
- ~~
~ -0 I/)
o 41 ...
_or.~
",0.
- .-
0- Q)
or..Ll~
_ 0
--
'" 11):=
,,4I~
E "or.
~ .Ll '"
:: = 0
<.--
... ~ 0
..
!f
i=
~
~
o
u
~
In
~
o
a::
~
~
<
!f....
-8
g~
U.S
~l
cl..
-if
~ llJ snqwnlO:)
-~
In_ 5
~ ~ St4 laH D!qwnlo:)
~~
I.L-
~
B
lII/
S
S:
1:
~
~
o
~
2
<
>-
~
u
'';l
>
UJ
~
~
1'<1101
ljJDd a>t01 6u!JdS
SpUDJ~ '.S
^aswoCJ
;MOJ9 >fOO
POOHlU!1
saljD10U!1
UO.5ulxal
dOU/!H
a>tOl wOH
^aIPIJ~
la4.as t$03
SP!dDCJ UOO:)
saU!d al:>J!:)
all!AJatua:)
SUJnS
aUIDIS
la4ta
DljOUV
Ja^opuv
\0
M N
0.. co
co
\0 '"
cO .....
.....
'"
l/')
N
'"
M
<:T
N
M
'"
<:T
M
N
M
.....
N
M
M
<:T
N
M
M
N
N
<:T
'"
'"
'"
M
M
<:T
.....
co
V'I
0>
C
U
>-
U
.,
c::
.....
::2
0..
co
\0
M
co
N
.....
V'I
co
o
N
.....
V'I
M
N
<:T
'"
\0
V'I
M
0..
N
co
o
4
'"
~
\0
o
M
M
N
o
'"
0>
C
-
.,
o
a.
E
o
U
.....
'"
0..
N
g
N
'"
CO
M
N
co
V'I
V'I
'"
M
o
N
o
,...
co
CO
<:T
N
4
M
.....
'"
'"
o
l/')
M
M
'"
V'I
N
,...
N
l/')
N
M
'"
N
'"
CO
0>
C
U
>-
U
.,
c::
co
~
,...
.....
N
,...
,...
\0
N
'"
M
<:T
l/')
N
<:T
'"
CO
,...
N
4
0..
o
M
V'I
M
co
0..
o
V'I
V'I
<:T
<:T
.....
N
'"
V'I
<:T
co
N
od
.....
-<T'
<:T'
co
'"
.....
M
0>
.S
-
.,
o
a.
E
o
u
,...
N
o
<:T
<:T
'"
,...
M
<:T
N
<:T
,...
co
<:T
,...
N
V'I
0..
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
N
0..
'"
N
,...
'"
<:T
<:T
CO
o
N
\0
'"
N
.....
N
N
'"
M
o
N
Ol
c
u
>-
u
.,
0::
'"
~
'"
,...
M
'"
o
'"
M
M
CO
M
,...
'"
l/')
\0
'"
M
0..
CO
<:T
M
,...
<:T
M
M
,...
'"
,...
'"
'"
M
'"
,...
'"
CO
M
N
'"
'"
'"
'"
N
N
\0
CO
Ol
C
-
.,
o
a.
E
o
U
'"
'"
'"
'"
N
'"
N
00
.....
.....
<:T
'"
M
M
N
.....
<:T
\0
<:T
o
'"
0..
\0
00
o
<:T
<:T
o
<:T
N
o
.....
'"
N
N
M
'"
N
'"
N
<:T
M
'"
<:T
CO
0>
C
U
>-
U
.,
0::
o
C'o
M
<:T
,...
'"
'"
M
l/')
'"
.....
N
o
V'I
CO
.....
.....
V'I
'"
'"
N
'"
N
N
M
,...
M
o
N
N
.....
M
'"
<:T
V'I
CO
o
M
'"
V'I
'"
o
o
CO
'"
M
M
M
00
N
0>
.S
.,
o
a.
E
o
U
'"
'"
N
CO
'"
CO
N
'"
M
'"
M
N
M
'"
CO
<:T
M
V'I
'"
'"
<:T
V'I
'"
'"
N
N
M
'"
\0
l/')
'"
M
V'I
CO
M
'"
o
.....
M
<:T
<:T
M
o
M
'"
l/')
,...
CO
<:T
N
0>
C
U
>-
U
.,
c::
c.
V'I
o
.....
.....
4
N
l/')
.....
N
.....
M
CO
<:T
M
CO
M
N
N
.....
CO
M
N
o
M
.....
<:T
'"
,...
N
<:T
CO
V'I
<:T
N
o
N
.....
'"
l/')
o
<:T
o
CO
V'I
'"
M
N
V'I
<:T
o
00
M
0>
C
-
.,
o
a.
E
o
u
'" 0
4 .....
o '"
M CO
'" \0
M N
'" ,...
4 '"
o
M
o
CO
'"
<:T
'"
o
N
CO
\0
,...
<:T
N
\0
V'I
'"
'"
4
o
'"
<:T
N
,...
\0
'"
,...
\0
N
<:T
'"
M
<:T
o
V'I
'"
'"
<:T
'"
00
M
M
g'
u
>-
u
.,
c::
'"
c,
'"
'"
<:T
.....
CO
N
<:T
8
M
o
0..
CO
<:T
0..
.....
M
CO
o
<:T
M
g
N
'"
V'I
CO
'"
CO
o
N
o
V'I
o
o
N
M
,...
<:T
'"
\0
V'I
0..
.....
<:T
.~
-
.,
o
a.
E
o
U
'"
M
~
CO
\0
,..,
'"
'"
o
M
<:T
CO
M
'"
,..,
o
N
o
N
CO
'"
N
'"
N
V'I
\0
\0
o
V'I
V'I
N
'"
N
'"
'"
V'I
CO
V'I
N
N
'"
V'I
V'I
<:T
M
'"
o
N
'"
~
'"
<:T
N
M
0>
C
U
>-
U
.,
0::
V'I
'"
'"
,
M
C'
N
M
o
o
,...
N
'"
o
4
,...
<:T
V'I
0..
\0
<:T
,..,
,..,
o
'"
CO
<:T
,...
CO
,..,
00
CO
0..
<:T
M
'"
N
o
'"
~
'"
0..
o
N
N
V'I
V'I
o
N
M
CO
<:T
<:T
,...
V'I
l/')
'"
4
0>
C
-
.,
o
a.
E
o
u
V'I
o
<:T
N
CO
V'I
o
V'I
I"-
,..,
\0
,...
N
o
'"
CO
N
'"
M
~
<:T
o
0..
0..
o
N
\0
\0
M
V'I
'"
N
o
N
M
,..,
M
o
'"
co
'"
co
~
'"
N
o
<:T
o
CO
'"
CO
0..
\0
'"
M
'"
M
o
V'I
CO
N
CO
'"
N
N
N
,...
.....
\0
8
N
'"
'"
o
<:T
N
M
N
N
o
'"
'"
'"
CO
<:T
N
o
'"
N
N
~
0..
'"
<:T
o
M
'"
CO
CO
'"
N
<:T
M
,..,
N
'"
g'
u
>-
u
.,
0::
0>
.S
-
.,
o
a.
E
o
U
o
o
C
N
,
""
0'
I
DATE:
September 1, 1987
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Letter from Bob Palmer re: Fire Department Needs
Memo from Bob Palmer re: Billinq churches. etc...
Memo from Clerk re: Election Equipment
Memo from d'Arcy re: Tonson
Park & Recreation Commission Minutes 8-20-87
July Fire Report
Special Meeting Minutes of Planning Commission 8/18/87
Ordinance 47C
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
\
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Hayor and City Council
COPIES TO: City Administrator
FROM: City Clerk bJ)
DATE: Auqust 27, 1987
REFERENCE: Optical Scanning Equipment for Elections
Anoka County will be going to an
for elections beginning in 1992.
ordered in 1991.
optical scanning system
The equipment will be
Each machine costs $5,000 and one is needed for each
precinct in the city. Therefore, we would require
four machines.
The maintenance cost is $400 per machine for two years.
This cost will probably be picked up by the County.
I would recommend that the city budget $5,000 each year
for the next four years so that when the time comes to
order the equipment we will not have to worry about where
the money is going to come from.
v
ANDOVER
FIRE
DEPARTMENT
1785
ANDOVER,
CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.
MINNESOTA 55304
August 27, 1987
Mayor and City Council:
I would like to inform the City Council as to the condition
of the Fire Department vehicles and needs in the near future.
After going over maintenance records and recommendations
from the Maintenance Committee, all of the officers have
discussed the situation on our unit 85 (old Coon Rapids)
tanker. We have taken it out of service; the tank is leaking
and the engine is running on the hot side.
Our 6-wheel drive brush truck is getting weak. The transmission
is leaking bad and needs replacing within a couple of years.
Hopefully not too soon.
We would like to add another service vehicle - a 4 wheel
drive unit for duty officer's unit and the old chief's unit
we have now would be used for inspections, schools, etc. This
unit should be purchased in 1989 for sure or if and when we
sell bonds for the new stations.
Robert Palmer
Fire Chief
ANDOVER
FIRE
DEPARTMENT
1785 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
August 27, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fire Department
I recently completed a survey of other Fire Departments to
find out if any of them bill churches or county properties
for fires.
With the exception of the Centennial Fire Department, no
department charges for fires.
Robert Palmer
Fire Chief
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
CITY of ANDOVER
James E. Schrantz. City Administrat.or
Vicki V.olk, City Clerk
Shirley Clint.on, Treasurer
Ci?
August 24, 1987
Claim list t.otals
Due t.o err.ors .on the claim lists, the totals sh.ould be
c.orrected t.o read as f.ollows:
July 7, 1987 the t.otal .of $168,483.74 should be $168,429.74.
If y.ou need any further inf.ormati.on, let me kn.ow.
DATE: September 1, 1987
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
~ Anoka County Soild Waste Abatement AaviRnry T~~k Eorce
~ Specifications for Hawk Ridge Project No. 87-23
,/
TKDA Commission Nu 7379-007
/ Lower Rum River Management Organization
:J North Central Public Service Company
HANDOUT Temporary Mobile Home Permit Request
HANDOUT
HANDOUT Appointment of P&Z Commissioners
HANDOUT Coon Creek Watershed Cost Apportionment Formula
-
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
ITEM Temporary Mobile Home
NO. Permit
BY:
Vicki Volk
AGENDA SECTION
NO. HANDOUT
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
The City Council is requested to approve a temporary
mobile home permit for Marc McMullen, 17920 Tamarack
Street N.W.
The McMullen home was destroyed by fire and they wish to
live in a mobile home while their house is being rebuilt.
Attached is a letter from Mr. McMullen requesting the
permit.
V:Attach.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
. I
I
I
ul&"~4 &~ ~. 3~ /957..
____ ___ J~--- - ___ __ ______ - - ___.__ - __.. ----- - - --. ----- -- - n - -
_, ----I{/c{-tumdd- ~ ~ un ~u~n~-----n
_n_n_~--~ nh1nb0 t1tt/v IormUnOwvn& -------
_.... j~i.&2k.a'l.~kff. YiL ..~..~. .~. ..m ....
_1-. Y' ;2.MJ0df.k kM &.f2 ..lfftL1.c/Udl ~-
---1-.t1~~--.-~~.n-.- -- -- -~-- --- -
..g~al4._~ <<md dLjz0c/!PlUL15- ~m_ .
_ __ .-tfL-Lup.- _n ...____ u- - -- - _n_
n_rJ;tf,nk;Ja~~ u~
-np~~-ffI~___ -
m=t.m ........ -=~~:;~~.... -
....-mj'~_=-=.............. ...~ .. C7!-1~ S~..~~~Vil
.______.. _______.________ _.____,___.~______~ ____.u___'..__._________. ____ _______ _ ----..--- --.-. --
-,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1987
ITEM
NO. Appointment of P&Z
Commission Members
BY:James E. Schrantz
APPROV~D. R
AGENDA
:;
BY:/
L/
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
HANDOUT
APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
The City Council needs to appoint 2 commissioners to fill the
vacancies, both appointments will expire 12/31/89.
Applicants are:
HAROLD SULLIVAN
REBECCA PEASE
BILL BERNARD
NOTE: Park Board is short 2 members also.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1987
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
HANDOUT
ITEM
NQ Coon Creek watershed
cost apport. formula
BY: James E. Schrantz
BY:
The City Council is requested to discuss the proposed formula as
presented by the Coon Creek watershed in the attached letter dated
July 17th.
The Watershed Board is anxious to proceed.
If this is agreeable, Jerry Windschitl and I, will meet with John
Drawz, Andover Attorney and representatives from the Watershed
Board.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Spt:.w>Lv- /" /987
DATE (28 August 1987)
BY:
zonin~ .dministrator
c/;'
d'Ar y ~~l
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
TONSON
Attached is a summary of the events that occurred in regard to
Tonson, Inc. at the meeting at Winona, MN before the Waste
Management Board and at the Environmental Services Committee
Meeting. In summary, the following has occurred:
The Waste Management Board has granted Milton LaPanta d/b/a
Tonson, Inc. an additional thirty (30) days within which to bring
the site into compliance with the schedule attached to the
Stipulation Agreement. If by October 12th he has not met the
clean-up schedule, the Waste Management Board will act to pull
into play the Guarantee that has been given by Tonson, Inc. and
Milton LaPanta personally to clean up the site.
The Environmental Services Committee has recommended to the Anoka
County Commissioners that the Solid Waste License be renewed for
Tonson, Inc. contingent upon it's continuing in full force and
effect the stipulation Agreement with PCA/Waste Management and
that the license be retroactive to July 1, 1987 through June 30,
1988.
If Tonson does not meet the schedule in the Stipulation Agreement
and the Waste Management Board moves to act on the Guarantee,
then the license from the County will be revoked.
We have until October 12th to see what's going to happen. The
action on the Revocation of Special Use Permit which has been
begun and will be heard before the Planning Commission should
just be stayed pending the outcome of the deadline date of
October 12th.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
MEMORANDUM
To File: 2050 1/2 NW Bunker Lake Boulevard
Tonson, Inc.
From:
d'Arcy Bosell
In Re:
Meeting at Winona, MN
Date:
28 August 1987
Yesterday, August 27, 1987, at the direction of the City Council,
I attended the Waste Management Board's meeting for the purpose
of beginning the process whereby they would execute the Personal
Guarantee in place in regard to the clean up of the Andover Tir~
Dump presently operated and monitored under the Stipulation
Agreement executed between the PCA and Milton LaPanta dated
January 27, 1987.
Ed Walsh from the Waste Management office first presented the
matter to the Board giving a brief outline of what has happened
and some detail in regard to the Stipulation Agreement in place.
Milton LaPanta was then asked to explain to the Board why he was
not in compliance with the clean-up schedule as set out in the
Stipulation Agreement and what he was going to propose to bring
the site into compliance. The alternative was to declare him and
it in non-compliance and call on the Guarantee in place and
eligible for call as of September 9, 1987. Mr. LaPanta gave a
summary of the happenings at this site since he took over the
site in 1985 including his difficulties in receiving timely
information from the PCA, the change of regulatory agencies from
PCA to Waste Management, etc., etc.
In his presentation to the Board and at the direction of his
partner, Bruce Johnson (who was also present at the meeting), he
requested the Board grant him a six (6) month extension on each
date on the schedule which would, in essence, change the
completion date to June, 1988.
Then the City was asked to speak to this issue. I told the Board
briefly about how this had come about, the chronology of some of
the events including who was in operation followed by whom, etc.
I then made them aware that in 1985 a Special Use Permit was
issued by the City to Schriptek for the tire recycling operation.
This SUP was subsequently passed on to Cecil Heidelberger when
Schriptek left the scene and then onto Tonson, Inc. as they took
over the operation. I also made them aware of the City's action
to revoke the Special Use Permit because the clean-up of the site
was not occurring. During this time is when the PCA entered the
picture with this Abatement Program and offered to pay for the
clean-up of the existing waste tires and that based on this
program and the Stipulation Agreement which was entered into, the
City stayed the action of the Revocation until February 1, 1987,
to give Tonson, Inc. and the PCA time to negotiate and put in
place the Stipulation Agreement. Subsequently, the Revocation
was not acted upon by the City and the SUP is still in place.
It was pointed out that from that time until June 28, 1987, the
City was not informed by the PCA or anyone else whether the
Agreement was signed, if any changes were made, etc. The only
communication we received in this regard was the somewhat regular
reports by the Anoka County Environmental Services staff who made
inspections of the site and reports thereon. The lack of
communication was great and caused some of the stress that now
exists.
I advised the Board that the City's goal is to clean up that site
and would like to have that accomplished as soon as possible. In
regard to the request of the Board staff to take action in regard
to the non-compliance at their regular meeting in September and
in light of the extension request of Milton LaPanta for an
additional six (6) months, I offered that the action in regard to
the Guarantee be extended by an additional thirty (30) days for
the following reasons:
1. I had made a visual inspection of the site on the day
prior to the Board meeting with Natalie Haas Steffen and
observed that Sites 1, 2 and the Wetland were so close
to completion that if we granted the additional thirty
(30) days, these Sites could be completed.
This would still put Tonson, Inc. behind in regard to Site 3 but
ahead of schedule in regard to the wetland, but there would be
three (3) sites completed by October 12, 1987, which is the
notice date for the Waste Management Board meeting in October.
2. As a part of my visual inspection it was observed that
the main schredder was down because a gear had just gone
out and the secondary, smaller, shredder was not yet on
line but expected to be so by Friday, August 28th or
Monday, August 30th and that the additional thirty (30)
days would allow enough time for repair and start-up.
The Board deliberated over many issues including why the schedule
was agreed to knowing full well the capabilities of the
equipment, etc. Much discussion, questions and answers were
dealt with prior to a vote taken by the Board.
Their action was that the matter would be brought before the
Board at the regular meeting in October (22nd), and that
compliance needed to be documented by October 12th which is the
date the meeting notice is sent out. If compliance has not been
accomplished, then the Board will act to execute the Guarantee in
place for just such reasons.
After that meeting, I went to the Environmental Services
Committee Meeting at Bunker Hills Activity Center to discuss the
license renewal of this same operation under the Solid Waste
Ordinance in place in Anoka County. Chairman Haas Steffen went
through the staff recommendation prepared by Bob Hutchison item
by item and the written response to that recommendation prepared
by Richard Sundberg, Mr. Lapanta's attorney, and each item was
discussed at great length as to why it was or was not to be
included in the license application.
After much deliberation, the Committee has recommended to the
County Commissioners to grant the license of Tonson, Inc.
retroactive to July 1, 1987 and running to June 30, 1988,
contingent upon the Stipulation Agreement with the PCA being in
full force and effect and that the compliance schedule be met.
That recommendation will be acted on by the County Commissioners
at their meeting on September 22, 1987.
Afterwards, I met with Milton LaPanta and Richard Sundberg in the
hallway of the Activity Center and told them both that if Sites 1
and 2 and the Wetland areas are not cleaned up by October 12th
there is no way anyone is going to support any extension at all
and the Guarantee will be called into place. Sundberg whole-
heartedly agreed with me and further agreed with my
recommendation that once the small shredder is working, to put
aside the tires coming in the front gate and concentrate solely
on the existing tire pile. Then once it is cleaned up, work on
the new tires coming in. Don't wait until the tenth hour and
then expect mercy.
The next forty-five (45) days will tell the whole story. Either
LaPanta will have cleaned up some of the sites completely and be
eligible for abatement monies or the Guarantee will be called.
The Revocation action presently started by the City can go
through the formalities and then wait to take action at the City
Council level pending the outcome determined on October 12th.
cllbt~
d' Arctl B6sell
Zoning Administrator
PROPOSAL TO ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL
This is a proposal by Mark and Shawna Slick to build a home
and a secondary building to be used as an artist studio on a wooded
4.75 acre lot in the Woodland Meadows development located in the
city of Andover.
Shawna and I understand the concern the city council has that
a residential area remain in appearance a residential area. We do not
want to build our home in an area where life is constantly disrupted
by loud machinery, foul odors, and a steady stream of traffic. We
have found that many cities, Andover included, have realized that there
are a few professions that can coexist in a neighborhood setting without
disrupting its integrity. The artist is one such profession, not only
because the arts are quiet and clean but also because a successful artist
can bring notoriety to a cowIDunity as well as educational and entertain-
ment experiences to its citizens. Many artists, myself included, give
freely of their time to demonstrate their craft to different community
groups such as scouts, senior citizen orqanizations, church groups,
and school students.
The following information will hopefully show the city council
that for nine years we have successfully operated a pottery studio in
a secondary building at our present residence without causing any
negative impact, and that we could continue to do so at Woodland Meadows.
I have been a professional artist since graduating from Utah
State University in 1976 with a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree in Photo-
graphy and Ceramics. In 1978 we moved from Minneapolis to our present
address in Coon Rapids. In 1979 I established my business, North Country
Stoneware, in my detached garage located at that address and have been
working there as a full time artist since 1980.
I am a professional ceramic artist. Each piece of pottery I make
is formed by hand on a potter's wheel, glazed, and fired in a kiln
until the glaze melts, at which point the piece is finished. Every step
from start to finish is done completely and quietly within the confines
of the studio.
I found long ago that I was an artist, not a salesman, and the
most efficient way to sell my work was to let someone else do it. At
present about 80% of my work is sold to art galleries, stores, and art
dealers. Most of the remaining 20% I retail myself at art fairs. How-
ever, because my studio is in a residential area I have had many requests
from neighbors to visit the studio and to purchase pieces for themselves
and as gifts. To accommodate these requests I have been having one to
three studio shows a year. These showings are held on weekends and allow
neighbors, friends, and customers to see the studio, ask questions
about the artwork, see demonstrations of how the pottery is made, and
make purchases. These showings have become anticipated events for many
of our neighbors as a time they may purchase gifts that are more personal -
handmade by someone they know. The three showings a year (approximately
six days) have been the ONLY retail business done from the studio.
The city of Coon Rapids considers these events to have the same impact
on a neighborhood as a garage sale. The remaining 359 days of the year
my business goes essentially unnoticed. There are no signs, posted
shop hours, retail business conducted, noise, traffic, or any other
type of physical evidence of a business being situated on the property.
To emphasize this fact, I am including a letter signed by our twelve
closest neighbors. All but one have lived there since we moved in and
most, in fact, are the original owners having resided there for more
than 20 years.
Not only have we sought support from our existing neighbors
but, along with Woodland Development Company, we are seeking unanimous
approval from the thirty or so present lot owners in Woodland Meadows.
The Woodland Development Company itself has already given their approval,
pending approval from city council. We believe that Mr. Larry Carlson
and the architectural committee at Woodland have agreed to grant us
their permission to build in Woodland Meadows because we have shown
them by our future plans and by the past and present history of our
business, that it is our concern not to disrupt the neighborhood but
to blend in and become part of the community Woodland has hoped to create.
Shawna and I have spent a lot of time planning for our future,
and as most young couples, are looking for a community that provides
the type of environment where we would like to work, live, and raise
our two children. We feel we have found that place in Woodland Meadows
and the city of Andover. Both Shawna and I have a great love for
the outdoors. My father spent 30 years in the environment management
branch of the U. S. Forest Service, most of the time acting as Chief
Landscape Architect for an area encompassing 22 northeastern states,
including Minnesota. His primary goal was to provide recreational
opportunities for the public in the most natural and undisturbed environ-
ment possible. My father's appreciation of our environment and
respect for our natural resources has been deeply ingrained in my mind
as well. We feel the people of Woodland share this respect in their
development of Woodland Meadows. They have created a development by
fitting it into the landscape, retaining trees and wetlands other
developers may have chosen to destroy to increase their profits.
A concern for the environment, for our privacy, and that of
our neighbors are the reasons we chose the particular lot we did in
Woodland Meadows. We feel we can blend into its 4.75 wooded acres
and provide a horne, workspace, and natural environment of trees and
wildlife for ourselves and our children. The property gives us the
rural landscape that we treasure, along with the advantage offered by
a growing community like Andover.
We ask that the city council evaluate our proposal as an individual
situation and make judgments with the information we have provided.
We hope the council shares our belief that our type of business can
coexist and at times enhance certain kinds of residential areas. We
feel that an artist's studio such as ours is an exception to the normal
-2-
situation and that the geography of the piece of property on which
we hope to build in Woodland Meadows will further lessen its impact
so that it is in essence no impact at all.
We hope that you, the members of the Andover City Council,
will enable us to pursue our dream of building a home with a secondary
building as an artist studio on the lot we have chosen in Woodland
Meadows, and that we will be able to live, work, and raise our
family here in Andover. We thank you for your time and consideration.
-3-
,
i
WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT CO.
Suite 110 An.oka Office Center
2150 Third Avenue North
An.oka, Minnesota 55303
(612) 427-7500
August 26, 1987
Dear Neighbors and Lot Owners at W.oodland Meadows,
Mark and Shawna SJ ick would I ike their new home to be in Wo.odland Meadows. They
have ch.osen Lot 5, Bl.ock 7, which is on the northeast corner of the intersection
of Partridge Street and 175th Lane.
Mark is self-employed.
outside the home. Mark
his home, to be used in
the business requires a
His business is ceramics. His wife, Shawna, is employed
would like to build a second building, which would match
his ceramics business. He does n.ot sell retail, theref.ore,
very minimum .of traffic.
As you know, we have protective covenants and restrictions which cover Woodland
Meadows, and any deviation from these particular covenants and restrictions is
subject to specific approval. Over the years, we have had a few instances where
we have al lowed variances. These instances are very few and far between, and
they are handled in the same manner we are handling this matter. We go to the
other property owners and seek their approval only after we have thoroughly
reviewed the matter and d.o n.ot find the request contrary to our intentions
of safeguarding the beauty and value of the neighborhood.
In this case, the sec.ond building would be totally hidden from view. The business
does not create additional traffic flow exeept for one or two additional vehicles
each week. The business is very clean and does not cause any odors, noise, or
other forms of pollution. Any business use other than that specifically described
would automatically terminate our waiver of this covenant.
Mark's business was previ.ously handled in a residential area in C.oon Rapids. Those
neighbors have stated that this did not result in any problems whatsoever, but to
the eontrary, they enjoyed visiting Mark, observing what he was making, and perhaps
learning something about a new h.obby they may wish to take up.
The above is certainly not a full explanation of the business,
specific questions, please feel free to call Mark at 427-2468.
anxious to have their new home in our neighborhood but wish to
full approval fr.om all of the l.ot owners.
so if you have
They are most
do so only wi th
We have completely reviewed the matter and are comfortable in giving support t.o
Mark and Shawna. Our support is reflected in this letter. If you have an objecti.on,
please let us kn.ow within the next week by call ing our office, 427-7500. I want to
make it clear that this is not a majority rule, but it must be unanimous. If any
one family objects, we will side with that family. Mark and Shawna are aware .of
this and understand.
Property - lr.\-::<:i1ent. Development. Sale~
Neighbors and Lot Owners at Woodland Meadows
August 26, ]987
Page Tw.o
In closing, as indicated above, it is seldom that we are able to supp.ort a
variance. However, in this case we find Mark's "business" at home t.o be s.o
clean and unobtrusive that we d.o not have an objeetion. Therefore, perhaps
no one will have an objection.
Please call Mark with any questions and our office if you have an objecti.on.
We would ] ike t.o hear fr.om y.ou as soon as possible. Thanks.
jh
The ab.ove statements are true.
Mark Slick
.~
Mark and Shawna Slick have been our neighbors in Coon Rapids
since 1978. Mark has operated the North Country Stoneware
Pottery Studio from his residence since that time. His business
has not caused any disruption of this residential area, nor has
it meant any increase in traffic in the neighborhood. Mark's
work is done totally within the confines of his studio, and you
wouldn't know that Mark was conducting a pottery business from
his residence by observation.
I understand that there is some concern that Mark's pottery
business maintain a low profile, not interfere with other
residences in the neighborhood, and not affect the neighborhood's
appearance as a residential area.
As a current neighbor of Mark's, I can assure the City
Councilor any of his future neighbors that since he began
operating his pottery business in 1979 it has not negatively
affected our neighborhood's appearance as a residential area, nor
has it had any negative affect on our quality of life or what we
expect from a residential area. I can recommend him as a
residential neighbor without qualification.
DATED:
NAME
ADDRESS
.