The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC October 18, 1988 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE October 18. 1988 Engineering 1'-;$\'\ APPROVED FOR ::"jLD AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NQ Lunds Evergreen Estates BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to review Lunds Evergreen Estates 5th Addition for final approval as requested by Jim Lund. The City staff has reviewed the request and at this writing there are some concerns. 1. All lots are required to have 39,000 square feet pet Ordinance 10 Section 9.06 a(3) which states "no residential lot shall be developed for residential purposes unless it contains a minimum of 108,900 square feet, of which 39,000 square feet of land area is buildable". Lots which may not meet this requirement are: Lot 1 of Block 1, Lots 4 & 5 of Block 2, Lots 1 and 2 of Block 3 and Lot 6 of Block 4. These lots are required to have the excavation observed and compaction tests performed from the excavation to finish grade. The soil testing firm is required or Jim Lund's engineer is required to certify the lots are buildable. 2. The proposed grading plan for the individual lots the City Council approved is different from the Jim Lund's grading. Ordinance 10 Section 10.07 states "upon completion of installation of all required improvements, the subdivider shall file with the clerk reproducable tracing and two (2) copies of plans and specifications showing all improvements as finally constructed and installed". It is recommended to submit a final grading plan of the lots in the 5th Addition. 3. All lots areas which have been filled or have been disturbed are required to have 4 inches of an approved topsoil and seed. All other grading is to tie in with the existing grade, topsoil and seeded. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY 4. Escrow fees which are not submitted to the city of Andover include: A. Engineering, legal, street sign and installation costs of $4,100.00. B. One year warranty escrow of $17,500.00. 5. street lighting costs of $2,471.20 have not been paid for. Developer is required to pay AEC. Jim Lund has told me he was not interested in the street lights. His final plat was approved after the adoption to require street lighting in all rural subdivisions. 6. The City staff is concerned about Lot 2, Block 3. A ditch for drainage was constructed and may result in erosion due to steep slopes. The lot also may not be attractive to the homeowner and may cause some problems because of the location of the ditch. It is recommended to extend the pipe from the street right-of-way to the low area located to the west of the plat and place fill over this pipe area. SEE DIAGRAM ATTACHED. 7. Jim Lund is willing to enter into a development contract for the completion of the development. Mr. Lund suggested a completion date of December 1, 1988. *NOTE: Lunds Evergreen Estates 4th Addition still has some concerns. A. The Building Department is concerned that lots may not have 39,000 square feet of buildable area. The lots include Lots 2 and 4 of Block 4. B. Seed did not grow for the 3rd and 4th Additions. The City does have the warranty bond for the 4th Addition. It is getting late in the year to be re-seeding. It is recommended to extend the warranty bond for one year. C. Drainage easements were not shown as required per Ordinance 10. D. An as-built grading plan for the lots has not been submitted. The grading is different from the approved grading plan. u ~ ...-{ .0 ...-{ ~ ,E.:! 'eg ~ H o ~ -B IJ") g5 &3 "" ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &l ~ g ~ 8:: <'I~ ~ ~ ~ N s I 'I I'.' -j i i I I ,'J >, .,1 I I ~I I '.1 I , u("~. 1\' ,t ".0., I "J". 1{l1O r'\J I I . .. 'I' I) lJ' ,"1 :.:' J.. ~:' :;: ~- - . , ., .o..J .o..J .o..J .o..J al al <1l <1l "" "" ~ ~ f:: <1l <1l <1l ~ ~ 1iJ 1iJ' 0" 0" ;:l ;:l U) U) 0" 0" U) U) ~A ~~ 8~ ~~ 1.0 IJ") , ,..... '" N <'I II II II ~ 0 <1l co IJ") ....:I .--l co .--l ~ ~xx~ *,-t ... J-I ~ 0 E-l 1.0 ~ <1l .o..J ~ ~ H .o..J ~ ...-{ rn ~ p.., M._' __. ,. --- --- _..J ,~ ,,' O,It,~porl:"- .--- -- 'N I -::; o I~ I f ,', <:t '~II ~ ]~ '" r<) ....:I P.'l 'i ~' ~ ~ ~ II Y ~.." f's I-j~ ~.. u ~ I l- II.I~ q'~ I i~ Il~ oM ~ eg H g ~ 8 ~ rn .o..J H .. ~ .~ &l U) ~ 8:: ~ ~ ".-...: <1l .o..J ~ ct 0: ~ U C\J co "'0 I Ql 0;- C\J \l + j l- t a:: V\ w ..: ~ '\) ::::> '" u 0: Q) \) ::i: CO U) ....sl OJ <3 v - ,..; ,..; '- C\I CO CO CO '+ CO CO ~ I :> :> ~ lL ..J Z Z .] 1 0 , ro U) V\ ~ tI.1 ~ < ...t 1. ~ C\I l I- U ::::> a:: I- en z U) 0 '\I: u U) co co :> z en v z 0 a:: U) 0.. co ct co 0: ;;> ::E z u co I C\J + I- a:: W ~ ::::> u 0: ~ U co a a I ,9~ lL ..J q qq CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE October 18. ]988 AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ITEM NO. Sidewalk/Crooked Lake School BY: James E. Schr The City Council is requested to award the quote for construction of the sidewalk along the south side of Bunker Lake Boulevard across from Crooked Lake School. The project consists of constructing a 5' concrete sidewalk from Gladiola Street to Heather Street with tree removal of 10 to 12 ft. wide through the wooded area; i.e. the plan is not to remove all the trees between the street and sidewalk. We requested and received quotes from two of the contractors currently doing work in the City. Quotes are as follows: Burton Kraabel Forest Lake Contracting $14,329.25 $13,850.00 Recommend awarding the bid to Forest Lake contracting for $13,850.00. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY --- PR POSAL BURTON KRAABEL CONSTRUCTION INC. 15830 LINCOLN STREET N.E. HAM LAKE, MINNESOTA 55304 TELEPHONE: (612) 434-5323 Proposal Submitted To: Name Street City State Phone City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover iVlN 55}04 755-5100 N.)'!. Work To Be Performed At: Sidewalk 30uthside Bunker Lake Blvd. Street Between Heather & Gladiola st. City Andover State MN Date of Plens Architect ~~ We hereby propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of Sidewalk Quotation 80 Each Clear & Grub Trees @ $ 60.00 $ $ 4,800.00 1500 C.Y. Common Excavat~on @ 1.4ti 2,220.00 65 S.Y. Remove & D~spose Blacktop @ 1.90 123.50 95 L.P. Remove & D~spose Retalnlng wall. j.75 35b.25 20 L.F. Remove Chaln Llnk Fence 4-.00 tiO.OO 3000 S.F. Concrete Sidewalk 1.70 5,100.00 500 S.Y. Sod wlth topsoll '}.20 l,b50.00 'rotal $ ::ji 14,329.75 All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and spacifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Fourteen Thousand, Three Hundred Twenty-nine and 75/100 Dollars ($ 14,}29.75J. with payments to be made as follows: .l:'alO upon Gompl.etlon U! Job c , " ". ' Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra Burton Kraabel Const. Inc. costs, will be executed only upon written orders. and will become an Respectfully submitted ~ extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent JJ~~ upon strikes. accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry Per ,Pres. fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon al:xJve work.. Work~ , men's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by Note- This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within J() days. , " I 1 -1 'I . ---- BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLlK & ASSOc., INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS St. Paul, Minnesota ,#,. .. .;:,i ..:......-. I '-jj I L Ii -..t.--. _.___~ . ,- I I I II! I 1+-"- : ! i -' 1_, I LIII i,! If] , i I I I, I L ' ---L.TII -i I '-1-1 -t--!-J. ----1,..-1 I LL I I JI I I :~~.:'-..~' ..;"i\ ********************************* t::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::*******************************~: "'", ** "'", ** "'", ** "'", ** "'", ** EE WHAT'S HAPPENING? aa "'", ** "'", ** "'", ** "'", ** :: *Coon Rapids consulting engineer called 10/13/88 :: "'", that 129th Avenue has been cut off and the traffic ** :: has been detoured to Lily street. :: "'", ** "'", ** "'", Their street will be closed for a month. ** "'", ** "'", ** "'", I will be meeting with Coon Rapids people today ** :: and try to work with them to get the traffic off :: "'", Lily Street. ** "'", ** "'", ** :: We agreed to allow Coon Rapids to use Lily for :: :: emergency vehicles. ~~ :: "'", ** "'", ** "'", *Jim Schrantz and I met with Lee Starr an ** :: Gary Jackson from the City of Coon Rapids :: :: regarding the proposed rezoning of property :: "'", east of Round Lake Boulevard and south of the ** :: Andover City Limits. ,Several residents :: "'", expressed concern over the Medium Density ** "'", ** "'", zoning classification proposed by the ** :'" developer abutting an R-4 Residential District. ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" The developer has proposed a compromise that ** ~~ would leave a t' f 1 d . t 1 **** ~~ sec 10n 0 an approx1ma e y :: 300 feet wide in a Low Density residential :: ",'" development along the Andover-Coon Rapids ** :: border. Please see the enclosed map. :: ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ~ ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** ",'" ** "':*********************************~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: ".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".~~ i 'I J I 1 _. --._- "', .- ""-.1. '-"'~._"..,,:r1: ...~~~.:l';'.:i'.;i(~~!~:~~.~-it):I';~~':~:" ,.... . ----'--'.'.---------1-------------.-.-.--------.--------__g[ ----.~..... \" . , I . I I : ~: ~ [ [ c ;'j .I I 'J 0 j :l 'J "~ ' ,"" ._--.-..-.~ . . . D "j I ! Q ~~ I I, 1 f ..:N t .- . a.... '" ! ,-. i~ f~, i.':) 1- ,:) 1: ,;tj C) () ! ()) VI .e- DATE: October 18, 1988 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL 1988 Monthly BlI;lrl;ng nt>p"rtl"~tlt Rlilpgrt Ordinance No. 66A Planning and Zoning Comm;",,;nn M;nllt't>" ~~pt€lm-b-€-r 27 Planning & Zon;n~ Cnmm;",,;nn M;n"t~s - OctoBGr 11th Park & Recreation Commission M;nllt'p" - Ort'nhE'r f;t'h What's Happening PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. THANK YOU. TRAPP REALTY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TRAPP REALTY 888 WEST COUNTY ROAD D SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55112 (612) 633-6600 ill INTRODUCTION: James Trapp, broker and owner of Trapp Ralty, has been involved in the commercial/industrial real estate industry for 25 years. Mr. Trapp started Trapp Realty in 1979. He is also partner in MAT Properties, which is a developing Company and a Subsidiary of Trapp Realty. o Dan Pastorius, has been involved in rehabilitation and development of real estate since 1979. Tammy Anderson, has been involved in commercial and investment real estate since 1981. For the last three years, until recently, has sold real estate franchises for Century 21. COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES o In the commercial real estate industry, every business and every client is different, each one has their individual needs. Some are interesi~ed in just purchasing land, while others wan-l; to have a st.r'ucture built, that tlwy tb<.Omselv<"s own. With a joint venture, or a lease back, which ever will meet their needs. It is important for the real estate company invloved wiUlthis type of client, to be knowledgeable, diversified, resoureful, and capitalized. Trapp Realty has this ability and has been involved with all these various areas. Following, is a partial list of some of the clients with whom Trapp Realty has previously done real estate business with. Because of the rapport that has been developed, these clients will continue to work with Trapp Realty for their future real estate needs. o 31 Burger Kings Hardees S'l;andard Oil Texaco Food & Fuel Big Wheel Rossi Audio King Strick Leasing Great Brakes Tires Plus Blaine Dodge.' Atlantic Container Lines Menards Kennedy Transmission Meineke Muffler Precision Tune Galaxy Auto Spark's Tune Up Currently, we are involved with the site selection of several shopping center groups. We also have land available in the Northstar Industrial Park in Blaine and the Blaine Industrial Park for sale. Trapp Realty sold the majority of the River Ridge Addition in Burnsville, and is also responsible for the sale of the majority of truck terminals in the metropolitan area. c o PROPOSAL: Our proposal here today is that we would like to list, develop and sell a commercial/retail district in the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 34, otherwise known as Andover Comnlercial Park. o At this time, wi.th the exception of the two existing developed shopping centers located on Round Lake Blvd., the people in Andover must either go to Blaine or Coon Rapids to meet many of their consumer needs. Our demographic and market research indicates that our plans for development of this area would compliment and support the current retail facilities presently exisitng in Andover, as well as provide additional employment, attract new residents, and help keep consumer spending in Andover, rather than Blaine or Coon Rapids. c o o o o .t-~~ ti..-"i II Ii '\\ CITY of ANDOVER MEMORANDUM TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council anm;ni~r~~rnT ~nn r'~Tk Rl1~lAin~ n~r~rrm~nr october 1988 REFERENCE: SEPTEMBER 1988 Monthlv Buildina Department Report I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for the Month of September 1988: BUILDING PERMITS 30 Residential 1 Addition 6 Garages 1 Shed 1 swimming Pool 4 Chimneys/Fireplac 4 Porches/Decks -1 Fire Damage Repair 48 PERMITS 6 Sign 41 Heating 5 Heating Repair 21 Hook Up (Sewer) 39 Plumbing 5 Plumbing Repair 33 pumping 13 Septic 2 Septic Repair 26 Well 3 Well Repair 21 Water Meter 31 Certificate of Occupancy 23 contractor's License Total Building Department Income--September 1988 Total Building Department Income--YTD Total valuation--September 1988 Total Valuation--YTD APPROXIMATE VALUATION $ 2,745,000 45,000 36,000 1,600 15,000 9,067 12,500 10,000 $ 2,874,167 FEES COLLECTED 100.75 896.30 90.00 525.00 2,368.60 75.00 82.50 350.00 50.00 390.00 45.00 6,023.15 124.00 575.00 20,702.68 201,020.37 2,874,167.00 30,202,192.00 Total Number of Houses YTD (1988) - 287 Total Number of Houses YTD (1987) - 328 Total Number of Houses 1987 - 381 Total Number of Houses 1986 - 289 0 DA/jp o CITY of ANDOVER Regular city Council Meeting - October 18, 1988 - Agenda 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order o 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4. Approval of Minutes 5. Discussion items a. Andover Limited Partners special Use Permit b. North Lexington Landscaping Sign Variance c. Holm/Raudio Discussion, Cant. d. Presentation/Andover Commercial Park e. Ordinance 10 Amendment f. Dog Bite Complaint 6. Staff, Committee, Commission Reports a. Approve Authorization for Services/Tower 2 b. Hawk Ridge Hockey Rink Park Lights c. 7. Non-Discussion items a. Rum River Ranch Estates Final plat b. Approve Auditor's Agreement/1988 Audit c. Approve Deed/Tulip Street d. Approve Change Order/87-11 e. Accept Work/Goodridge Acres f. Award Bid/Bent Creek/88-20 g. Amend Ordinance 33/Parking Ord. 8. Approval of Claims 9. Adjournment o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Approval of Minutes DATE October 18. 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administration FOR ITEM NO. MOTION BY TO 4. BY: Vicki Volk The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: October 4, 1988 Regular Meeting (Apel absent) COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION October 18, 1988 DATE AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items Sa. ITEM An ove r Limi ted Partne s NO. Special Use Permi t ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning Jay Blake, Plann02( BY: l't' FOR The Andover City Council is requested to review and approve the Special Use Permit as requested by the Andover Limited Partnership to allow outdoor displays, sales and storage during posted mall operating hours on lots 1, 2 and 3 of the Andover Downtown Center. The proposal is allowed by special use permit per Ordinance 8, section 7.03. The Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposal and has recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Outdoor displays, sales and storage shall be conducted during posted mall operating hours only. 2. the location of the sales are to be restricted to the front locations of the mall parking lot, excluding the back receiving and loading areas. 3. If the outdoor displays, sales and storage are kept overnight and if the area is not well lit, reflective material;s must be placed on the displays so as to help illustrate the display areas for safety purposes. 4. The special use permit shall be subject to an annual review by both the Planning and zoning Commission and the City Council. Please review the enclosed Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission September 27, 1988 Page Two Motion was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Bosell to approve the September 13, 1988 minutes. Two present votes - Don Jacobson, Becky Pease. All others votep yes. Motion carried. ' VARIANCE (HOFFMAN). CONTINUED Todd Haas recommended that this item be tabled at the request of the applicant. There was some discussion by Chairman Perry who asked Commissioner Bosell for how long this item ,could be tabled. Commissioner Bosell stated the variance did not have a time frame. It was agreed by all of the commissioners to table this item until further notice. ANDOVER LIMITED PARTNER SPECIAL USE PERMIT DOWNTOWN CENTER. LOTS 1-3. BLOCK 1 Todd Haas stated that the applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow outdoor sales during operating hours as required by Ordinance 8 (Zoning Ordinance), Section 7.03. Sandra Peterson is requesting the special use permit for any tenant in the mall who wanted to hold sales outside of their stores. Wayne Vistad asked if there would be tents for these outdoor sales. Ms. Peterson stated there might be for sales such as furniture. Mr. Vistad asked also what types of displays would the mall have. Ms. Peterson stated there might be outdoor sales for snowblowers and lawn mowers. Also he asked how many feet on the sidewalk portion would the sale be held. Sandy Peterson stated it would probably be about three feet out. Mr. Vistad asked if the outdoor sales would be for the clients of the center to display their merchandise or would they be anticipating tables of craft sales. Ms. Peterson stated there were no plans for craft sales outside. Mike Steinhauser, General Manager of the Mall, stated that, except for city celebrations, they do have churches come in for one weekend to display crafts. Mike Steinhauser stated that the permit they are requesting would be for special occasions such as city celebrations, and perhaps 1-2 other celebrations in the summer. o o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission September 27, 1988 Meeting Minutes Page Three Commissioner Bosell made the following clarification stating that it was the intent of the Downtown Center that the bulk of the sales would be held in the interior of the mall, and the crafts would be held in the interior of the mall also. Ms. Peterson stated that any outside groups coming in, other than the tenants of the mall, need to obtain a special permit. Don Jacobson asked why the applicant needed outdoor sales. Ms. Peterson stated the sales would be for special events that would require a permit. The tenants are not pressing for outdoor sales, but the mall wanted to encourage outside sales during the special events. Mr. Jacobson wondered if it was only a couple times during the year that they wanted the permit, why don't they get a permit for those cou~le of times during the year. Ms. Bosell stated that that the cost would be $160 for each permit. Mr. Jacobson had a concern about sales being out on the blacktop, where there are parking spaces. Ms. Peterson they had more parking spaces than are required by law. He also had a concern about the traffic and protecting the outside sales tents from wild drivers. Ms. Bosell stated that the tents would be placed out of the traffic flow. Mr. Jacobson also asked what the "operating hours" would be. Mr. Steinhauser stated the sales would be according to the mall operating hours. He also stated the sales would only be held in the front of the mall. Mr. Jacobson had another concern regarding the traffic hazard that might occur if the mall had a kiddie carnival. Ms. Bosell stated that carnivals are not regulated by permits. Mr. Vistad stated that the one permit per year is a good idea, as long as it is stated that outdoor sales and displays would be restricted to the front areas of the shopping center and the sales would take place during mall operating hours. Mr. Jacobson also asked if outdoor sales items were brought in for the night, or are they left outside all night. Ms. Peterson stated that when the outside furniture sale was held, the sale items were left outside overnight but there was someone there to guard the items. Chairman Perry stated that it might be wise to put in any recommendation made by the Planning Commission a requirement that some type of reflective material be placed around the outdoor sales area, to prevent any traffic/safety problems. Mr. Vistad stated there would be enough lighting. o o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission September 27. 1988 Meeting Minutes Page Four Chairman Perry opened and closed the public meeting. Ms. Bosell stated that this is one of the reasons why the City of Andover staff should develop some type of system to bring the special permit up for a review. Ms. Bosell asked if Chairman Perry could bring this item up to to the City Council. Motion was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Bernard that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested by Andover Limited Partners, 13735 Round Lake Boulevard, for Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1, Addition, Downtown Center to allow outside displays, sales or storage during mall operating hours. The location of sales are to be within the front locations of the parking lo~, to exclude the back area of the building, of the Downtown Center. A Special Use Permit is required under Ordinance 8, Section 7.03 Shopping Centers, stating outdoor sales and storage during operating hours. A public hearing was held, and there was no opposition. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. This special use permit shall also require, if outdoor displays or storage areas are to be kept overnight and if the areas are not well lit, that the parties who have those displays put reflective material to help illustrate those displays at night for safety purposes. This special use permit will be subject to annual review by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Mr. Jacobson again, in regard to the phrase "normal operating mall hours," asked if the food store was part of the mall. Ms. Peterson stated yes it is. Ms. Bosell stated that the sign on the doors state the mall operating hours. Mr. Jacobson was concerned as the food store was open for 24 hours. Mr. Vistad stated the motion could be restated to read, "during normal operating mall hours, with the exclusion of Festival Foods." Chairman Perry stated that by stating operating mall hours would be sufficient and would not include Festival's operation. Ms. Sandy Peterson stated that the posted mall hours refers to the interior mall tenants. Ms. Vistad stated that it WOllld be clarified if the wording mall interior operating hours was used. He personally felt mall operating hours was sufficient, as did Ms. Bosell. Roll call: reluctant yes. All voted yes, with Mr. Jacobson voting a Motion carried. o o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission September 27, 1988 Meeting Minutes' Page Five This item will be heard by the City Council on October 18th. ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE/SNOWMOBILE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Todd Haas stated the purpose of the amendment to the existing ordinance was to enable a handicapped child to use an ATV. Mr. Vistad stated that the main reason for passing the ordinance was because of the destruction they create. He did not feel that because a person was handicapped that they should have this right to destroy property. Ms. Bosell stepped down on this item and stated that the request was brought to the Planning Commission on behalf of a 10- year old boy who has muscular dystrophy but that there would be other handicapped people that could benefit from the change to this ordinance. She stated from Minnesota Statute 169.045, provides that in the case of a handicapped, that an ATV or a golf cart can be construed to be a wheelchair. This family has purchased an ATV for their son because it would allow him to have the mobility that he would have as a normal ten-year' old able to ride a bicycle. It is expected that his use would be less than a year and he may be immobile within a year, and in a wheelchair. Ordinances from other communities such as St. Charles, Champlin, Bloomington and Barnesville were review~d by Ms. Bosell. Ms. Bosell found that the four cities designated specific roadways , where the ATV's could be operated, the vehicles were not allowed to operate except between sunrise and sunset and they were not allowed to operate in inclement weather that would restrict their visibility. The person u~ing this vehicl~ has to meet the criteria set out in Minnesota Statute 169.045, subdivision 2 which defines the handicapped person. Consistently, the communities are requesting a certificate of insurance as this applies to the liability circumstances. Also in three of the four communities, if the section of the ordinance pertaining to the handicapped person is violated, the permit can be revoked. Mr. Vistad stated that ATV's were dangerous on hard- surfaced roads and that golf carts are not designed for hard- surfaced roads. Ms. Bosell stated it was a four-wheeled ATV that the 10-year old was planning to use. Mr. Vistad did not feel that made a difference on a hard-surfaced road. o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BY ANDOVER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LOTS 1-3, BLOCK 1, ANDOVER DOWNTOWN CENTER, ALLOWING OUTDOOR DISPLAYS, SALES AND STORAGE DURING MALL OPERATING HOURS. WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed the special use permit request of the Andover Limited Partnership for outdoor displays, sales and storage during mall operating hours; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has received no negative comments during public discussion; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has found that the request will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. WHEREAS, the city Council has reviewed the request and heard testimony from the general public. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the special use permit requested by the Andover Limited Partnership, on lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 1 of the Downtown Center, for outdoor displays, sales and storage during mall operating hours, with the following Conditions: 1. Outdoor displays, sales and storage shall be conducted during posted mall operating hours only. 2. The location of the sales are to be restricted to the front locations of the mall parking lot, excluding the back receiving and loading areas. 3. If the outdoor displays or sales are kept over night and if display areas are not well lit, that reflective materials be placed on the displays so as to help illustrate the displays for safety purposes. o o o 4. The special use permit shall be subject to an annual review by the Planning and zoning Commission and the Ci ty Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this of , 19 day CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION October 18, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NQ Discussion Item 5b. ITEM or Lexington NO. Landscaping- Variance FOR BY: The City Council is requested to review the variance request of North Lexington Landscaping to allow a sign to exceed the maximum square footage allowed per Ordinance 8, section 8.07. The subject property is located on Hanson Boulevard and is currently zoned R-1 residential. The sign ordinance allows for one 24 square foot non-residential identification sign per lot frontage in all residential districts. The request is for a single 64 square foot sign identifying the applicantrs landscaping business. The Planning and Zoning Commission has heard public comment on the proposal and finds that there is no undue hardship caused by the shape, topography or condition of the parcel of land and a strict interpretation of the Cityrs Ordinances would not preclude reasonable use of the property. The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended denial of the variance requested by North Lexington Landscaping. Please review the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY I o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission September 27, 1988 Meeting Minutes Page Seven Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Pease that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission direct the City staff to prepare some language, suggested change to the ordinance, and to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at the October 4th meeting. All voted yes. Motion carried. VARIANCE/NORTH LEXINGTON LANDSCAPING This is a request for a variance to allow for a sign to exceed the maximum square footage allowed per Ordinance 8, Section 8.07, as requested by North Lexington Sod. North Lexington Sod did have the sign up, but it has been taken down. Ms. Bosell stated she would not vote on the issue, as she's been the one working with the applicants directly on this item. Mr. Vistad stated that this request was similar to the one by Hoffman Brothers, in that they also wanted a larger sign to get the exposure for their business and because of their large property size. Mr. Vistad ;stated that if this request was approved, that the City would probably be receiving an uncontrollable amount of requests of applicants wanting the same privilege of having larger signs. Mr. Vistad felt that North Lexington could use two signs and get the proper exposure. Chairman Perry addressed item #7 in the letter from North Lexington Landscaping which states, "Aesthetic Value - One sign per 200 ~cres detracts less from the natural beauty of the area than several smaller ones." Ms. Bosell pointed out that the variance provision only has to do with the shape and condition of the land, and doesn't have anything to do with aesthetic value. Chairman Perry asked if the City should be looking at aesthetic value and whether the total acreage should be used in determining the size size. Mr. Vistad stated that an area in North Dakota where unlimited signs were allowed, it looked horrendous. He thought that an area that has uniform sizes would look a lot better aesthetically. He doesn't feel the one big sign should be allowed on the 200 acres. Mr. Jacobson asked Ms. Bosell to clarify the ordinance. Ms. Bosell stated that a double-faced sign may be permitted with the maximum square footage on each side. o , o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission September 27, 1988 Meeting Minutes Page Eight Mr. Jacobson asked the applicant why they wanted a larger sign. The applicant, Mrs. Kuiken, stated that they were requesting 64' sign for a mile and a quarter frontage. Ms. Bosell stated they could have 24 square feet per side with a maxinwm of two sides. Mrs. Kuiken felt it would look better to have one larger sign than five small signs. Ms. Perry stated that one of the things the Planning Commission has to consider is that Hanson Boulevard is going to be undergoing some dramatic changes, and whatever we do with this sign request will set a precedent for other sign requests for that area and for other residential areas. The applicant felt that if the City would tie the amount of acreage to the size of of the sign allowed then the City would still maintain proper control on this issue. Mr. Jacobson stated certain things have to be true in order to grant the variance -- a hardship determined by the shape of the land, the condition of the land, and if the variance is not granted the applicant is. denied a reasonable use of the property. Ms. Pease suggested investigating the language of the ordinance, as she felt that one sign would be better than a lot of smaller ones across the parcel of land. Mr. Kuiken felt that requirements for a smaller sign did not make sense. Chairman Perry stated that she was able to read the smaller signs travelling at the 55 m.p.h. Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobson, secoudcrl by Commissioner Vistad, that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the variance request by North Lexington Landscaping, 17405 Ward Lake Drive, Andover, to erect a sign greater in size than allowed by ordinance in a residential district. The Planning Commission, after listening to the applicant, that under ordinance 8, Section 5.04, cannot find that a hardship is created by the shape or condition of the parcel in question, and cannot find that a variance is necessary to the reasonable use of the land and for those reasons recommend denial. There was discussion on this motion. Chairman Perry asked if Mr. JacobHon could revise the motion to read approval, and if the commission members choose to vote no, this item would go to the Council as a no-vote. o ~ o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission September 27, 1988 Meeting Minutes Page Nine Chairman Perry indicated that the City Attorney and the League of Minnesota Cities have repeatedly stated that motions should be made for approval and then defeated by the vote. A recomendation could be included in the motion for what conditions can be imposed on this sign. Ms. Bosell also stated that a motion to deny is improper according to Robert's Rules of Order. After some discussion, it was agreed to further discuss this item at the Special Meeting October 4th. All members voted yes, except Ms. Bosell as she did not vote on this item. Motion carried. SPECIAL PLANNING & ZONING MEETING Chairman Perry stated that a special meeting was scheduled for October 4th to discuss about four items. Two other items were added to the work session -- the amendment to the ATV ordinance, and the discussion on how to make motions. Commissioner Vistad asked the Planning Commission if they could also discuss in the work session what should be included or eliminated in the minutes. Ms. Bosell stated the minutes are done by preference; the City sets up as a policy as to their preference and whether they want verbatim minutes, summary minutes or legal minutes. Mr. Vistad was concerned that not all the discussions were included in the minutes. Chairman Perry stat.ed that the Planning Commission had talked about this at the first of year, and it was agreed to have the narrative type of minutes which includes some discussion but not all of it. It was suggested that Mr. Vistad could make a special request to the chairman or recording secretary to include in the minutes various items of discussion after an affirmative motion is made. AD.!QURNj'JENT Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobson to adjuurn the Planning and Zoning Commission at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, (Plan.8) C24 o o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANORA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE REQUEST BY NORTH LEXINGTON LANDSCAPING TO ALLOW A SIGN TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED PER ORDINANCE 8.07 WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover has reviewed the request of North Lexington Landscaping for a sign size variance to allow a 64 square foot business sign along Hanson Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the City's Ordinance #8, section 8.07 states that all non-residential identification signs are to be limited to 24 square foot in size in residential districts; and WHEREAS, the Commission has found that there is no undue hardship caused by the shape or condition of the land on the property; and WHEREAS, the Commission has found that a strict interpretation of the sign provisions in the City's Zoning Ordinance will not preclude reasonable use of the property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby deny the sign size variance requested by North Lexington Landscaping to allow a 64 square foot non- residential identification sign in a residential district. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this of , 19 day CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE October 18. 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Discussion Items c. Holm/Raudio Discussion, cont. Engineering FOR BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to discuss the proposal of Raudio and Holm to fill the Outlot "A" in the industrial park. Attached is a report from John Rodeberg and a letter from Bill Hawkins. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY LAW OFFICES OF o Burke nltd Jlnwkilts SUITE 101 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA !5!5433 PHONE(61217~299B JOHN M. BURKE W1U1AM G. HAWKINS BARRY M. ROBINSON October II, 1988 Re: Sonterre Property R~iD CITY OF ANDOVER Mr. James E. Schrantz Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 Dear Jim: I spoke with the sons of Dorothy Sonterre in regard to the possibility of utilizing part of her property for ponding in connection with the potential sale of the outlot along Bunker Lake Boulevard by the City. They indicated preliminarily that they would have no problem wi th the City u til izing part of the property for additional drainage as long as it didnlt interfere with any of the buildings on the property. I advised them that we would proceed further with the possible sale and relocation of the drainage plan and that upon the finalization of the ~ransaction if it occurs we would present them with the plans 'and specs for their approval. Hawkins WGH:mk o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE October 18. 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Discussio 5d. Presentation/Andover Commercial Park Engineering FOR BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to hear a proposal by Dan Pastorius of Trapp Realty to sell the lots in Andover's Commercial Park. He was one of the agents at the October 4th meeting with M.R. Olson. Information for the presentation is in your packet. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION October 18, 1988 ITEM NO. Discussion I Se. Mining Permits Erosion Control DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning BY: Ja APPROVED FOR AGENDA~ BY: AGENDA SECTION NO. The City Council is requested to review the proposed amendments to Ordinance #10 (Subdivision Ordinance). The following is a brief chronology of of the proposed amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance: April 19, 1988 - The Andover City Council discussed problems with mining of soils and subsequent sale of materials outside the City of Andover. Council members agreed that it would be to the City's benefit to require closer scrutiny over mining, natural vegetation and erosion control. The Council referred the item to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further discussion. May 12, 1988 - The Planning and zoning Commission discussed the item at a special meeting, noting that the mining permit requires a special use permit and should have a public hearing. The Commission recommended that an amendment be drafted to the City Subdivision Ordinance that would address the concerns raised by the City Council. July 26, 1988 - The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance compiled by the City Planner that would control siltation and erosion on new subdivisions and lot splits. It was the intent of the Planning and Zoning Commission to clarify procedures, define terms and add erosion control enforcement measures. August 9, 1988 - The City Council recommended that the Planning and zoning Commission take into consideration that as much natural vegetation be left in place and that natural contour should be maintained as much as possible. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o o Page 2 Ordinance 10 Amendments October 18, 1988 August 16, 1988 - The city Council was requested to review the proposed Ordinance 10 amendments. The item was tabled and added to the next City Council work session. september 27, 1988 - The item was on the agenda, however, no discussion was recorded. october 4, 1988 - The Planning and zoning Commission, at a special work session reviewed the proposed amendment, made final corrections and recommended that the City Council review and approve the amendments to Ordinance #10. The amendments address: A. The Scheduling of Planning and Zoning Commission and city Council reviews of plat applications. B. The placement of temporary and permanent vegetation after grading. C. Establishing erosion control policies, related financial guarantees and enforcement measures Please review the enclosed information. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o ORDINANCE NO. 10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10, THE SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No. 10 is hereby amended as follows: SECTION 7. PRELIMINARY PLAT 7.02 Procedure. f. The Planning Commission shall conduct the hearing on the preliminary plat and shall make its report to the Council within teA (10) thirty (30) days after said hearing. g. Aite~ the Se~Aei~ ~eeeives the ~e~e~t ei the P~aAAiA~ SemmissieA the Se~Aei~ at its Ae*t ~e~~~a~ sehea~~ea meetiA~ sha~~ aet te a~~~eve e~ aisa~~~eve the ~~e~imiAa~y ~~at. The report of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be placed on the agenda of the City Council in the following manner: (1) Recommendations from the Planning and zoning Commission meeting held on the second Tuesday shall be placed on the agenda of the City Council at their first Tuesday meeting of the following month. (2) Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be placed on the agenda of the City Council at their third Tuesday meetin~ of the following month, unless there are five Tuesdays in the glven month from which the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission is made, in which case the recommendation shall be placed on the a enda of the Cit Council at their first Tuesda meetin of the o oWlng mont . If the Council shall disapprove said plat, the grounds for any such disapproval shall be set forth ln the proceedings of the Council and reported to the subdivider within seven (7) days thereafter. SECTION 17. EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL o 17.01 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. For the purpose of alleviating harmful or damaging effects of on-site erosion and siltation on neighboring lands and waters in the City of Andover and adjacent communities during and after development adequate controls of erosion and sedimentation of both a temporary and permanent nature shall be provided by the developer during all phases of land- disturbing activities. Plans and specifications for such controls shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Said plans and specifications will be a part of the development contract and compliance will be assured by the development bond. No development ~ shall be permitted until said plan is approved by the city Engineer. 17.02 Required Control Measures. The following control measures are required for an erosion and sediment control plan: a. The plan shall be suited to the topography and soils so as to create the lease erosion potential. b. The land shall be developed in increments of workable size on which adequate controls of erosion and siltation can be provided and maintained during the construction period. Operation shall be staged so that the area being developed is not exposed for long periods of time without stabilization. c. Temporary vegetation and/or mulching shall be used to protect the areas exposed during the development. No area shall be left denuded for a period longer than the S days from initial grading on critical erosion areas. Such period may be extended if satisfactory control measures are established and remain in place. This determination will be made by the City Engineer. d. Sediment basins (debris basins, desilting basins, or silt traps) shall be installed and maintained to remove sediment from runoff waters from the land undergoing development. Storm sewer inlets shall be provided with debris guards and microsilt basins to trap sediment and avoid possible damage from blockage. The silt shall be removed when necessary. e. Permanent vegetation and structures shall be installed within 30 days after completion of initial grading. f. If the control measures required by items 3.a, 3.b, 3.c, 3.d and 3.e are not installed or maintained by the developer, no additional building permits shall be issued within the development until the necessary measures are placed in control. g. Erosion control practices shall follow the design criteria as shown in U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Services Urban Runoff, Erosion and Sediment Control Handbooks. 17.03 Financial Guarantee. Before any grading is started on any site, appropriate control measures as shown on the plan shall be installed. A $2,000 per acre financial guarantee shall be provided to the City to insure compliance during construction. $1,000 of the total amount shall be by cash deposit. The remaining amount shall be by an exclusive letter of credit providing for withdrawal of the funds by the City within one work day. This financial guarantee will not be returned until all the disturbed area has permanent vegetation re-established. The City will use the guarantee for the penalty included in Item Sa and if any invoice for work performed by the City is not paid within 30 days. 17.04 Enforcement Measures. ~ a. Developers will be given a 48 hour notice by telephone when an unsatisfactory condition exists that is determined to be a developer's responsibility. After said 48 hour notice, the city will proceed to do the work and invoice the developer. o o b. In addition to the actual cost incurred by the City, the developer will be charged an additional 10% as a penalty for not having adequate erosion control. If a timely payment is not received, the City will proceed to draw on the financial guarantee. c. Builders will be given a notice at the time of building permit issuance that erosion control on the lot being built upon, and street cleanup of any and all materials originating from the lot being built upon, are their responsibility. No inspections will be approved if the street is not clean and erosion control in place. In the event the City is required to clean the street, the builder will be billed and payment received prior to any further inspection or occupancy permit. 17.05 Street Cleaning. Included within the Development Contract shall be the requirement for street cleaning if needed, as determined by the Public Works Director. SECTION 1f 18. VARIANCES. SECTION 18 19. VIOLATION AND PENALTY. SECTION 19 20. REPEAL. SECTION ~9 21. EFFECTIVE DATE. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1988. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administration October 18, 1988 ITEM Dog Bi.te Complaint NO. 5. f. BY: Vicki Volk APPROV~ FOR AGENDA ( BY: r The City Council is requested to declare a Dalmatian owned by Carey & Mary Rudick of 13784 Zilla Street N.W. a "biting dog". Attached is the deputy's report regarding an incident where this dog attacked a boy and his dog on September 24, 1988. V:Attach. October 14, 1988 Mr. R~dick called today and said that he had given the dog to the Humane Society two weeks ago. However, Deputy Roessler would like the Council to declare the dog a "biting dog" in the event it shows up in the city again. COUNCIL ACTION c MOTION BY TO SECOND BY ACSO DEPT. -1__._.'>__________00_. OFFENSE REPORT 88-129101 CASE #_.______ _ __.._oouoo . ~."" r- .. - -.... , ~..,. ".... .. - .. .-.- - - OFFENSE: DATE REPORTED: TIME: DOG ATTACK 9-24-88 1626 hrs. ~as there a witness to the crime? (If yes, place an X in box.) LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: COMMITTED BETWEEN UJ DATE & DATE _.. ..-.-.-..-.-- ~ ANDOVER TIME' __ - TIME - a: Is there physical evidence present? (If yes, place an X in box.) 0 WAS SCENE PROCESSED? YES Xl NO 0 IS FURTHER PROCESSING NECESSARY? NO ill YES M.C.I.U. DETECTIVE(S) BY WHOM? Deputy Roessler AT SCENE - Are there circumstances or a noticeable MO indicating a need for additional investigation? (If yes, place an X in box.) Is stolen property traceable? (If yes, place an X in box.) -. .- Was anyone arrested? (If yes, place an X in box.) lSlhere a suspect vehicle? (If yes, place an X in box.) ~ YEAR: MAKE: COLOR(S): IDENTIFYING MARKS/CHARACTERISTICS: U UJ 0- en LICENSE II: t.ICENSE STATE: :J en - Is there information about a suspect? (If yes, place an X in box.) .. '-"0- ..;. ~ . - -. , V.Vu:tlrll W-1.Wllnt.~s PR Pl'f501l "!IJ{}fllllq A.Arrl'~tt:d (Lt':)l !lace & S(!x) Q-Owner S,SIlSIH".l W.2-Wltness PK.f'~.tS"1\ Wlttl kl1owh:rJ~ll! po- P"rson (JI5COVI.'flllg AD-Ad(lress ch(!CkCd - CODE PERSONS DOB ADDRESS TELEPHONE ---.. ---.----- PR Mary Schmidt Andover 55304 RES# 757-4002 ~~. -.-.---- 1310 1 313 tlL.ffiL..._...N_..~ _BUS# V Mark Gmeinder Andover 55304 RES# -:;z-s...7.~O.J.:J.~- .... ------------ a gSLl.2.L_ 1.3914 Rluehirn s+- BUS# N.\.v. RES# (f) ------ BUS# Z 0 Andover 55304 RESU -755-3925-- 0 carey & Mary RuMGk_ 1.3784-Zi-ll-a-S-t--.-N-.-W.... _BUS# -~----- en ( Sp?) a: RESU UI ----- --~-----_.._---- BUSU 0- RESU -. -. -----.- .. ---.------.- --.----.---------- ---..---- ----~ _ BUS# ..____... RES# .......-- BUS# RES# . - BUS# RES# - BUS#. RESU____._.___. ---.---- BUSU I certify the above information is true and correct X ",'-. -- . ,.,.- '~- . " - .n " l~' .... ,~-. ~ Z ASSISTING OFFICER(S) 0 PROPERTY LOSS RErjORT? YESo NOD - o INACTIVE (l CLEARED BY ARREST o UNFOUNDED (] EXCEPTIONALLY CLEARED REPORTING OFFICER DATE I- o OTHER: ___ (/l __ _._._u______.__._______.___.__ . un - --- --.-- Z OFFICER ASSIGNED .....Q~Euty Roessler mr 9-2fi-B8 __u_u_ .---- ------------ ..._--~ :E BY: DATE: SUPERVISOR DATE 0 c2: ~~..~'~ '''-1-':?I''':''::;'';~''''''''~;~...c~ -. .._........;.;;.:;~.- -~ I~'-.;;..;..: ._- ". ... -.".._- ,dJ'lll:' -~ o o o o D o o o '" 88-129101 FORM 3 SUPPLEMENTAny INVESTIGATION REPORT CASE NO. o DOG ATTACK OFFENSE COMPLAINANT ADDRESS ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF OFFENSE. PROGRESS OF INVESTIGATIONS. ETC. On 9-24-88 at 1626 hours, I received a call of a dog complaint at 1310 138th Av. N.W. in Andover. Upon my arrival, I spoke with the complainant, Mary Schmidt who stated that shortly before the call time, she heard some dogs fighting and upon going out in the street in front of her residence, she observed the next door neighbor dog, a dalmation, which belongs to the Rudick family fighting with another dog that was on a leash and the juvenile male holding the . leash had been on a bicycle. The dogs were eventually separated and the Rudick dog took off east bound and they were unable to get a hold of the dog. The complainant obtained the name, address and phone number from the juvenile on the bicycle and he advised her that he and his dog were fine. She then went into the residence and phoned the Rudick residence and re- ceived no answer. She stated after this, her daughter was able to get a hold of the dog and get it in a kennel in the back of the Rudick residence. The complainant stated that the dog was on a leash that was fastened to the ground outside of the kennel and that the kennel door was open so that the dog could come in and out of the kennel. Apparently when the dog saw the other dog going by with the victim, the dog broke its leash to go after the other dog. The complainant stated that her son had been bitten by this dog already this year and that she felt the dog was very vicious in nature and that the dog should not be kept at the residence. I did take a dog bite report from Mary Schmidt several months ago when her young son was bitten by the neighbor dog. At that time, I did contact the owners of the dog. I spoke with both Carey and Mary Rudick regarding their responsibilities in quarantining the dog to check for rabies and also I advised them that if the dog was involved in a future biting incident, that the city could have the dog declared a biting dog and the dog could be removed from the city. It should be noted at this time that Mr. Rudick was very unco-operative and Mary Rudick seemed to be very co-operative. They both advised me at that time, that they would not be keeping the dog--that they would.be getting rid of the dog. I then went down and spoke with the victim who stated that his parents were not home. He advised me that he was fine and that his dog was okay and that neither one of them had been injured. He stated that he was very frightened and that the incident did kind of shake him up as he was riding his bicycle while walking his dog at the time of the attack. THIS OFFENSE IS DECLARED: 1.1 I.J o [J U~ded C~ by Arrest Exceptionally Cleared Inactive (Not Cleared) SIGNED DATE Investigating Officer SIGNED DATE Chief 0' Commanding Ollie., This Form is Used by Officer Assigned to a Case to Report Progress After Three and Seven Days and Weekly Thereafter. Also to Report Significant Developments. ACS-OI4 .. FORM 3 SUPPLEMENTAny I"VESTIGATIOM REPOnT 88-129101 CASE NO. qage 2. OFFENSE DOG ATTACK COMPLAINANT ADDRESS ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF OFFENSE, PROGRESS OF INVESTIGATIONS, ETC. I returned to the Schmidt residence and advised Mary that he was okay and advised her that I would have the City Clerk provide a copy of this report to the City Council under the dog biting ordinance. At the time of this report, I have as of yet not been able to contact anyone at the Rudick residence as no one is home. Deputy S. Roessler #86 CC: Andover City Clerk mr/9-26-88 THIS OFFENSE IS DECLARED: [J [J [J 11 Un~ed ChW by Arrest Exceptionally Cleared Inactive (Not Cleared) SIGNED DATE Investigating Oflicer SIGNED DATE Chief or Commanding Officer This Form is Used by Officer Assigned to a Case to Report Progress After Three and Seven Days and Weekly Thereafter, Also to Report Significant Developments. ACS-014 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Commission ITEM 6a. NO. Approve Authorization for Services/Tower 2 DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT October 18, 1988 Engineering FOR BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the authorization for services for Tower 2 with TKDA. Attached is a copy of the authorization. We feel that we are developing at a rate that we need the 2nd Tower soon to provide pressure and flow to the development on this (south side of Coon Creek). It takes 2 years to get a tower on line so we would like to be ready. If Red Oaks Manor and Northwood Addition would petition, we would have a lot of users in one year. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA AUTHORIZATION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO: Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, Incorporated 2500 American National Bank Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Comm. No. 9368 Date Pursuant to our Agreement dated January 5, 1988, as amended, you are hereby authorized to proceed with the professional services described as follows: 1 MILLION GALLON ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK NO. 2 AND CONNECTION WATERMAINS CITY PROJECT NO. 88-35 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide Engineering Services for Part I - Plans and Part II - Construction Engineering in connection with a 1 Million Gallon Elevated Water Storage Tank No. 2 and Connection Watermains within the City Offices Complex area to include operating controls and appurtenances. II. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY TKDA A. PART I - PLANS 1. Preliminary Design Phase a. Review the proposed project with the OWNER'S Public Works Director to determine the project's scope of work. The review will determine what information will be monitored, what equipment will be controlled, and the location of equipment. b. Prepare preliminary design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary drawings, outline specifications and a revised opinion of probable construction costs. c. Review preliminary design documents with OWNER. -1- o 2. Final Design Phase On the basis of the approved preliminary design documents, TKDA shall: a. Prepare, for incorporation into the Contract Documents, final drawings to show the character and extent of the Project (hereinafter called Drawings) and Specifications. b. Furnish to OWNER such documents and design data as may be required for, and assist in the preparation of, the required documents so that the OWNER may apply for approvals of such governmental authorities as have jurisdiction over design criteria applicable to the Project, and assist in obtaining such approvals by participating in submission to and negotiations with appropriate agencies. c. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable construction cost caused by changes in extent or design requirements of the Project and furnish a revised opinion of probable construction cost based on the Drawings and Specifications. d. Prepare, for review and approval by OWNER, his legal counsel and other advisors, contract agreement forms, general conditions, supplementary conditions, bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of other related documents. e. Submit two copies of the Contract Documents consisting of Drawings, Specifications and related contract forms to the OWNER. Make minor revisions and adjustments following OWNER'S review. B. PART II - CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 1. Bidding Phase During the Bidding Phase, TKDA shall: a. Reproduce final Contract Documents for bidding and construction purposes. b. Assist OWNER in obtaining bids for each separate prime contract. c. Prepare bid tabulation. d. Assist OWNER in evaluating bids and in assembling and awarding contracts. o -2- o o 2. Construction Phase - General Services During the Construction Phase, TKDA shall provide the following general services: a. Consult with and advise OWNER and act as OWNER'S representative as provided in the Contract Documents. b. Attend and assist OWNER with pre-construction conference to be attended by the Contractor, OWNER and others as may be requested by the OWNER. c. Make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional, the progress and quality of the executed work of Contractor and to determine in general, if such work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. d. Review and approve (or take other appropriate action in respect of) Shop Drawings (as that term is defined in the Contract Documents) and samples, the results of tests and inspections and other data which Contractor is required to submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project. ! e. Issue all instructions of OWNER to Contractor; issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith, prepare change orders as required; have authority, as OWNER'S representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work. f. Based on TKDA'S periodic on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, determine payments to Contractor in such amounts; such recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to the OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, that, to the best of TKDA'S knowledge, information and belief, the quality of such work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. g. Conduct an inspection to determine if the Project is substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the work appears to have been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents and if the Contractor has fulfilled all of his obligations thereunder, so that TKDA may recommend, in writing, final payment to Contractor and may give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed). -3- o o h. Prepare for OWNER, on request, a set of reproducible record prints of Drawings showing those changes made during the construction process, based on marked-up prints, drawings and other data furnished by the resident project representative, to TKDA, and which TKDA considers significant. i. TKDA shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, for acts or omissions of the Contractor, Subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the Work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. Construction Phase - Resident Services In addition to the above General Services, TKDA shall provide a Resident Project Representative at the site on a part-time basis during the construction phase of the Project. The Resident Project Representative is TKDA'S agent and will act as directed by and under the supervision of TKDA and will confer with TKDA regarding his actions. Resident Project Representative's dealings in matters pertaining to the on-site work shall in general, be only with TKDA and Contractor, and dealings with subcontractors shall only be through or with full knowledge of Contractor. Written communication with OWNER will be only through or as directed by TKDA. Through more extensive on-site observations of the work in progress and field checks of materials and equipment by the Resident Project Representative, TKDA shall endeavor to provide further protection for OWNER against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractor; but the furnishing of such resident Project representation will.not make TKDA responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety precautions or programs. The Resident Project Representative shall also stake out the construction work, utilizing a TKDA survey crew, on a one-time basis. Restaking shall be considered as Extra Work. -4- o o III. ITEMS NOT INCLUDED* A. Soil borings and related tests. B. Land appraisals, negotiations and/or related services. C. Registered land or right-of-way surveys; right-of-way mapping. D. Environmental studies. E. Financial planning including services of bond consultant. F. Publication costs associated with advertising for construction bids. G. Permit application fees. * Or, if specifically requested by the OWNER, such services shall be performed by the TKDA and shall be billable pursuant to Article 3 of the Basic Agreement and such billings shall be over and above any maximums set forth herein. IV. COMPENSATION Compensation for the services described herein shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of the January 5, 1988 Agreement, subject to the following additional conditions: A. Payment for Part I services shall be subject to a maximum amount, determined in accordance with the attached curve. Approved at a meeting of the City Council on 19 By Attest Consultant Acceptance by , 1988. Authorized TKDA Representative -5- o '. " J 5 --- - 14 _. - .- - .- - 13 -1- - . -- - 12 -- .- - . 11 - - .- c '" u ~ '" a. _~.l 0 - -1- - c' 0 ~ - -. .. '" ~ c '" 9 a .- . _. f 0 u c - -. - .., <J I '" ::2: 8 - .- - : . - 7 . . . 6 - .. '- .. j I . 5 . .. 0.01 00:' 0.1 Net Construction Cost, in millions of dollars o \-~ \~ -.,. ~ \ --- --- N I ---,-~ Jr'= = -== ,f- -- -I: --+-1 ------ I-Tl! e----+e- h" 1----1] e--- === _~jl,_::+ - - J f-- ----,! -, I -~ Net Construction Coat "/0 from lit Curve 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 100,000 250,000 500, 000 750,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 21 18 16 14.6 14. 22 12.63 10.75 9.52 8.90 8. 53 7.82 7.36 7.20 7.10 --- . -, .\ .-- -" .- -" 1 0.5 50 100 5 10 NtT CONStRUCTION COSI SNALL INCLUOE AlL CONStRUCTION COSlS fOR JHICH PLANS AR( PR(PAREO, IHClUOING AlT(RHAT( 810S, WH(THER OR NOT ACC(PTfO. UNtIL SUCH TII(( AS CONSIRUCIION COST HAS Ol(N O(T(RWIN(O 8T AWARD Of CONIRACT OR ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. 1 RE1S- ON1BlE lSIIW11[ Of COSI SHAll 8[ UTllll[O. o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE October 18, 1988 Engineering AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Commission ITEM 6b. NO. Hawk Ridge Hockey Rink Park Lights ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT BY: James E. Schrantz The staff is gathering information regarding this item. It will be presented at the meeting. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE october 18, 1988 ITEM NO. Non-Discussion Items 7a. Rum River Ranch Estate Final Plat Engineering 11Yr. AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the final plat for Rum River Ranch Estates. It is recommended that the plat be approved subject to the following: 1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to cover legal and engineering costs of $500 to the City of Andover. 3. Receipt of Park dedication fees of $3670. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF RUM RIVER RANCH ESTATES AS BEING DEVELOPED BY CLYDE SMITH IN SECTION 13-32-25. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Rum River Ranch Estates; and WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of Rum River Ranch Estates; and WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources has reviewed and approved the plat; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final plat of Rum River Ranch Estates contingent upon receipt of the following: 1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to cover legal and engineering costs of $500.00 to the City of Andover. 3. Receipt of Park dedication fees of $3,670.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED ci ting the following: 1. Variance for Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 for minimum lot area; and 2. Variance for Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 for lot frontage. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1988. CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE October 18, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Items 7b. Approve Auditor's Agreement/1988 Audit Engineering BY: James E. Schrantz ITEM NO. The City Council is requested to approve the attached understanding with its auditor George M.Hanseri Company, P.A. "Greg Murphy" . The fee is not to exceed $11,900. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o o GMHCo GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY, P.A. A Professional Corporation a/Certified Public Accountants -r- I Q-oh__ ()C I. (\ September 26, 1988 R' ECEIVEn ~~lU CITY OF ANDOVER Mr. James Schrantz, Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Dear Jim: Enclosed is our proposal regarding the 1988 audit of the City. The 1988 fee is an increase of $1,200 over the 1987 fee. This increase is due to the greatly increased activity during 1987 and 1988. I would like to meet with you and the Mayor to discuss this proposal. Please call me to set up the meeting. Very truly yours, GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY, P.A. ~.\.. ~v ; J. Gregory Murphy JGM: iac Enc losure 1433 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 175 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 6121546-2566 GMHCo GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY. P.A. A Professional Corporation ofCerlified PubliC' Acrountants o D ECEfV.f r nr;~ 27 198;7D CITY OF ANDOVER September 26. 1988 City Council City of Andover Dear Council Members: This letter will confirm our understanding of the arrangements covering our examination of the financial statements of the City of Andover. Minnesota for the year ending December 31. 1988. We will examine the general purpose financial statements as of and for the year ending December 31.1988. Our examination will be made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and will include such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. The objective of our examination is to express an unqualified opinion on the financial statements. although it is possible that facts or circumstances encountered may require us to express a less than unqualified opinion. Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, tests of the physical existence of. inventories and direct confirmation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected customers, creditors, legal counsel and banks. At the conclusion of our examination. we will request certain written representations from your staff about the financial statements and matters related thereto. The fair presentation of financial pos~t~on and results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles is management's responsibility. Management is responsible for the development, implementation and maintenance of an adequate system of internal accounting control and for the accuracy of the financial statements. Althougb we may advise you about appropriate accounting principles and their application, tbe selection and method of application are responsibilities solely of management. Our engagement is subject to the inherent risk that material errors. irregularities or illegal acts. including fraud or defalcations, if they exist, will not be detected. However. we will inform you of any such matters that come to our attention. o 1433 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH. SUITE 175 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 612/546-2566 City Council City of Andover o September 26, 1988 Page 2 Fees for our services are based on our regular per diem rates, plus out-of-pocket expenses, all of which will be billed as our work progresses. Our fee for this engagement will not exceed $11,900. Our services include the work necessary for the "Legal Compliance Audit Guide". Should any situation arise that would increase this estimate, we will of course, advise you. Whenever possible, we will attempt to use your personnel. This effort could reduce our time requirements and help you hold down audit fees. During the course of our work, we may observe opportunities for economy in or improved controls over your operations. We will bring such matters to the attention of the appropriate level of management, either orally or in writing. Please indicate your agreement to these arrangements by signing the attached copy of this letter and returning it to us. We appreciate your confidence in retaining us as your certified public accountants and look forward to working with you and your staff. Very truly yours, GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY, P .A. dg,!Z7 ?/f~ JGM:iac Enclosure Approved by: City of Andover, Minnesota Date o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE October 18, 1988 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR NO. AGEr)d Non-Discussion Items Engineering ITEM 7c. NO. Approve Deed/Tulip Street BY: James E. Schrantz BY: 7 The City Council is requested to accept the easement for Tulip street. Reynolds property. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY SECOND BY C TO o Form No. 28-M-QUIT CLAIM DEeD Individual ($) to Corporation or Partnership Minnesota Uniform ConveyancIng Blanks (1978) Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19_ by County Auditor Deputy Date: STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ EXEMPT .19~ t"t.' FOR VALUABLE ~NSlDERATION, ~. ~ hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to (reserved for recording data) Arthur R. Revno1ds and Stella Revno1ds, husband and wife ,Grantor(s), (marital status) Ci tv of Andover \ Grantee, , a nmni r.ipal C!orporati on real property in Anoka under the laws of M inn es 0 ta County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. (~ ) I? ITvl-Cf/k ,..Q L- Arthur R. Reynp'lds Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF AID KA } ~. ~-d./~~ Stella Reynolds The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ;({-<< day of a';'-1!;' A..// by Arthur R Rp..ynold~ Find Stp.lla Revnolds. hnshnnn andwifp. ,1~, , Grantor (s). r.NOTARIAL STAMP'ORSEAL(OROTHER TITLE OR RANK) 'I \ - - - --."-..-..--.---...-.-..--..-.."----.,.--....-..-.- ,.... ..------......---...........-.---,-...---.--....-..-.."-.--...-.-..----.....'-...-...---..-.-.--, 'THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS): i I I ! .~. 1@.SIt'RtEYA.ClINTON' ' NOTARY PIlBlIC . MINNESOTA . ANOM COUNTY My Commission Expires Oct. 12. 1990 .~. Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 i .___J .M.,A'h~ u. &.-J:--~ SIGNATUR F PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT Tax Statements tor the real property described In this instrument should be sent to (Include name and addre.. ot Grantee): . City of Andover ;"').1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 ""-,,!:.,,: '':;'' ._'!;'<-t!~ '~~..., Tit"- <;(_h'lco.''I~:::: '-(a.(~ 755 - SIO<> ..r Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Individual (,I to Corporation or Partnership Minnesota Uniform Conveyandn. BlanD (1918) Millet-Davi, Co., Minneapoli. o No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19_ County Auditor by STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ EXEMPT Date: . 19 ...u... (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERA TJON, Arthur R. Revnolds and Stella Revnolds. husband and wife ,Grantor(s), (marital status! hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to Ci ty of Andover , Grantee, a nmnicipal corpnr~t:ion real property in Anoka under the laws of M inn eso ta County; Minnesota. described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if mora space il neltded, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. a~ jf ~dJcL- Arthur R. Reyno. ds AffIX Deed Tax Starn p I1ere ~~~ Stella eyno ds STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF AID KA } u. The foregoi\1g instrument was acknowledged before me this -:It.-of by . l!l.ll.L, . Grantor (s). .~,^'-'" 1@.SHIRLEYAClINTON... . NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA': j ,ANOKA COUNTY ""' CommlssiOll Expj". Oel. 12. 1990 I .~-.ll( ,'~'-'-'.--._---~._"'_.'-.-.._~-".'".'"---"_._'''.'''''-.-..---.-.-...... Tn: Statemeah to.. the ..eal property described In tbillnltrument mould be NIIl &0 (bto1u4e name u4 add.... of Grant..): , city of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS): Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 o ~: , i I I I ..J o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE October 18, 1988 ITEM NO. Non-Discussion Item 7d. Approve Change Orderj87-11 Engineering AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the change order to televise the sanitary sewer in Project 87-11, trunk to Winslow Hills and the school. We required the television because of the deep sewer and concrete pipe. This also gives us a log of the pipe for future inspection to watch for any changes in the pipe condition and check areas that were sealed for leaks during the construction period. Recommendation from TKDA. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE October 18. 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Item~ ITEM 7e. NO. Accept Work/ Goodridge Acres Engineering 11'(\ APPROVED FOR AGEND~~ YI BY: / f BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the improvement of grading, topsoil, seeding and streets for Goodridge Acres. The City staff has been to the site to inspect the work of the developer. COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL GRADING AND STREET CONSTRUCTION OF GOODRIDGE ACRES SUBDIVISION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY WALT JOHNSON AND GLEN GEVING IN SECTION 4-32-24. WHEREAS, the developer has completed grading, seeding, and streets of Goodridge Acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final grading and street construction of Oak Bluff as developed by Walt Johnson and Glen Geving. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by Meeting this , 1988 by unanimous vote. the City Council at a day of CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE October 18, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Non-Discussion Items 7f. Award Bid/Bent Creek/ 88-20 Engineering BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the resolution awarding the bid for Project 88-20, Bent Creek. The bids will be received at 10:00 A.M., October 17, 1988 and the bid recommendation distributed at the meeting. It looks like we may be there before the grading contractor is ready. Attached: Resolution MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 88-20 FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN, AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF BENT CREEK ESTATES. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. R249-88, dated October 4, 1988, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate as being the apparent low bidder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a contract with in the amount of for construction of the Improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond requirements met. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the Meeting this 18th day of City Council at a October Regular , 1988, with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor <:> ATTEST: Victoria Volk - City Clerk DATE October 18, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT o REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Commission ITEM 7g. NO. Amend Ordinance 33/ Parking Engineering BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve Ordinance 330 amending the ordinance regulating the parking of motor vehicles on public streets within the City of Andover to allow for parking by permit. Attachment: Ordinance 330 MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 33D AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 33, 33A, 33B AND 33C, ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE PARKING OF MOTOR VEHICLES ON PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER". THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Add to Section 1: 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1988. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk