The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC September 16, 1986 o 7:30 P.M. o CITY of ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16, 1986-AGENDA 1. Call to order 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4. Continued Public Hearing/Dehn's/86-l9 5. Discussion Items a. Blaine Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Lot Split; b. Final Plat/Goodridge Acres c. Final Plat/Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition d. Award Contract/86-l2/l54th Lane and Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition e. Police Report/139th Avenue Speeding f. Conroy Assessment Split, Cont. g. Typical Section/133rd Avenue h. Award Contract/Declare Cost/86-3 i. 6. Staff, Commission, Committee Reports a. Fire Department/Sprinkling Codes b. 7. Non-Discussion Items a. R/W Acquisition-85-8/Green b. Park Ordinance/Hours C. Approve Street Specifications d. Award Sealcoat Bid/86-23 e. $2,600,000 Bond Sale f. 8. Approval of Minutes 9. Approval of Claims 10. Adjournment o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 16, 1986 ITEM Continued Public Hearin NQ Dehn's/86-19 4 BY: James E. Schrantz AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEpARTMENT Engineering The City Council has continued the public hearing for Project 86-19 Dehn's area storm drainage. The Council has requested that the Staff determine a funding solution and have a joint powers agreement approved with the City of Anoka. , ~ The letter from Bill Hawkins states that there are adequate funds in Project 80-3 to participate in this project. The County has been contacted and they will participate to the extent outlined in the Short Elliott report in an amount of about $9,000.00. Good Value will be requested to fund the pipe from outlot "A" North Glen 2nd Addition to the proposed storm drain pipe along County 116 new alignment. The area benefiting directly from Project 86-19 would be assessed at a rate to be determined by the City Council, all items being considered. I recommend that Andover proceed with the improvement. Attachment Storm Water Boundary Agreement COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o 1 , , J j , ] i 1 , , , I J , j 1 1 1 o i . STORM WATER BOUNDARY AGREEMENT This agreement made and entered into this day of , 19 , by and between the City of Anoka, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Anoka" and the City of Andover, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter re- ferred to as "Andover." WITNESSETH: The parties share a mutual boundary line and common storm water drainage areas. Some facilities have been constructed and others are in various stages of planning and development which do or can provide for drainage of areas in both communities. The City Councils of each of the communities recognize the benefits to be derived through cooperative efforts by both communities to resolve storm drainage problems through joint effort. It is the purpose of this agreement, therefore, to provide the means by which the Cities can combine their efforts toward construction of storm drainage facilities in one community which will also serve areas located in the neighboring community and to provide a means for financial participation in the cost of such improvements by both communities. Now, therefore, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. It is agreed that the Sonsteby/Dehn's/Rosella's Ponds storm drainage to Chutich Pond can benefit both cities. A. Sonsteby/Dehn's Pond receives water from Noon's, Hutton & Rowe and Faddler's Additions. ~ o II. The area of the trunk storm drainage system is as follows: A. It is recognized by the parties that Anoka has con- structed a storm drainage system which could serve a portion of the southwest part of the City of Andover, namely (Sonsteby/Dehn's/Rosella's Ponds basins, which include Noon's, Hutton & Rowe and Faddler's Additions. The area of Andover/Anoka which is gener- ally shown in the Banister Engineering Report to Anoka dated 1967, and is also shown on Exhibit 1, dated April, 1985, attached hereto and made a part of this agreement. Andover agrees that it will com- pensate Anoka for its share of the construction cost of the existing Sunny Acres storm drain trunk. pay- ment to Anoka shall be in the form of a connection fee. The connection fee shall be $100,000. Payment would be made within one (1) year following completion of construction of the 116 storm drain pipe or in accordance with such other terms as the parties may agree to. l ~ B. Andover is currently proposing the construction of Project 86-19 which involves the construction of a storm drain system to serve the above-mentioned area. The area involved is more particularly defined in that certain report furnished to Andover by Toltz King Duvall and Anderson and is also shown on Exhibit 1. Upon construction the area will drain to the Chutich o pond after being detained in the upstream ponding system; then, after further detention, ln the Chutich - 2 - o 1 i J J ! 1 l j 1 j , J j i 1 i 1 i 1 i I I 1 , , I j ~ o Pond drain to the Sunny Acres storm drain trunk in Anoka. III. The trunk system will be fro~ the Rum River through the Sunny Acres storm drain trunk; through Sunny Acres pond- ing; through the new (1986) constructed pipe along County Road 116 to the Sonsteby/Dehn's/Rosella's ponding areas; through the ponding area to include Anoka's subdivisions of Noon's, Hutton & Rowe and Faddler's Additions. Anoka and Andover will participate proportionately in the future replacement cost of the system on the basis of buildable land using appropriate run-off factors for each land use type. IV. It is agreed by the parties that ownership of facilities constructed by each City shall remain with that City. Each City shall be responsible for the maintenance within its own limits of all phases of the drainage system, unless assumed by the Water Management Organization. V. In the event of extraordinary maintenance, such as an oil spill in Anoka or Andover which carries into Anoka, as Sunny Acres trunk system, the City wherein occurs the incident causing the need for extraordinary maintenance shall be respon- sible for all costs, regardless of fault up to and including the first retention pond located within Anoka. VI. Each City hereby grants to the other the right and privilege to flow surface and drainage waters through each others facilities as identified herein, as Exhibit 1 or as may be identified in the future, provided appropriate compensation has been paid in accordance with this agreement. - 3 - o o VII. The parties agree that the design standards to be used by each City shall be the 100 year flood level for storage and trunk facilities and the 10 year flood level for lateral facil- ities. The governing body of the City which is to receive the discharge shall, prior to the ordering of any improvement by the other City, be given an opportunity to review the plans for the project and shall given conceptual approval, provided that the plans fall within the parameters set herein. XIII. Each City may finance its share of the costs of any project as the governing body may see fit, including paying from general funds, the selling of improvement bonds or the assess- ment of their cost to benefiting properties. In witness whereof the parties hereto have entered into this agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF ANDOVER By: Its: Mayor By: Its: City Clerk CITY OF ANOKA By: Its: Mayor By: Its: City Manager - 4 - o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 16, 1986 ITEM Blaine Congregation of NO. Jehovah's witnesses Lot 5.a. C~,~~ BY: Vicki Volk APPROVED FOR AGEN~ II r4~ V AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning & zoning MOTION by Apel, seconded by Rogers that the Andover Planning and zoning Commmission recommend to the City Council approval of a lot split requested by the Blaine congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses on the property known as PIN 13 32 24 42 0001 for the following reasons: 1) It is part of an orderly planning process; 2) It would not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the community; , ~ 3) There was no opposition. j J j , ; ~ , Approval is contingent upon the receipt of the Certificate of Title for the West 33 feet as shown in the diagram and the payment of park dedication fees in the amount of $100 per lot. , , ~ 1 1 . , j . 1 1 I 1 l I 1 j 1 , i j t i j 10 Motion carried unanimously. NOTE: This was applied for on a Variance Request form rather than a lot split form. . COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY - ...- o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT REQUESTED BY THE BLAINE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS PIN 13 32 24 42 0001. WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and reviewed the lot split request of the Blaine Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses; and WHEREAS, after such review, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request citing 1) it is part of an orderly planning process; 2) it would not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the community; and WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with those reasons given by the Planning and Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the lot split request of the Blaine Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses to split the property known as PIN 13 32 24 42 0001 into two separate parcels. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval is contingent upon the following: 1) the Certificate of Title for the West 33 feet as shown on the diagram will be provided for recording purposes; 2) payment of park dedication fees in the amount of $100 per lot. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of 1986. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor James E. Schrantz - City Clerk o REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ITEM Nightingale Estates/ NQ 3rd Addition ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DATE SepTPmhpr 1 fi 1 qAfi Engineering 5c BY: Todd Haas The City Council is requested to approve the final plat of Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition. The final plat conforms to the preliminary plat. The streets have been constructed to a rough subgrade. I recommend the plat be approved subject to the following: (1) The escrow for the City improvements is estimated to be $11,500, to be paid 9/16/86. (2) Paying the approximate cost of streets, signs and installation in the plat in the amount of $775.00. (3) The title opinion has not been received from the City Attorney. (4) Park dedication - cash in lieu of land $4875 to be paid 9/16/86. COUNCIL ACTION o MOTION BY TO SECOND BY B E61 o 1 ~ I 10 1 , CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF NIGHTINGALE ESTATES 3RD ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY ESTHER OLSON AND GARY DEHN IN SECTION 22-32-24. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat of Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, the develoepr has presented the final plat of Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, the developer has deposited security sufficient to cover legal, engineering, consultant and street sign costs; and WHEREAS, the developer has entered into a Development Contract with the City of Andover for the installation of utilities and streets and has paid the required escrow of $11,500; and WHEREAS, the developer has paid to the City a deposit to cover all plat fees; and WHEREAS, the Park Dedication be paid in lieu of land in the amount of $4,180. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plat of Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1986. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor James E. Schrantz - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Discussion Items ITEM Award Contract 86-12 NO. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering September 16, 1986 5d BY: James E. Schrantz AGENDA SECTION NO. The City Council is requested to approve the Resolutions awarding the bid for Project 86-12, 154th Lane and Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition. The final plat and development contract should be a companion item with awarding 86-12. We haven't received the plat and development contract at this time. Project 86-12 154th & Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition BID 87,102.50 About 3% above estimate in feasibility report TOTAL BID PROJECT 86-12 $120,198.50 COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY . ) I o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 16, 1986 ITEM Typical Section/ NO. 5 133rd Avenue BY: James E. Schrantz APPROVED FOR AGENDA 4 BY: AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT The City Council at the joint meeting, September 8, 1986 asked the Typical Section for 133rd Avenue to be placed on the agenda to consider the roadway and street right-of-way width and also the setback. We have been using to date half of a 36' street or 18' from center of street to the front face of the curb in a 33' R/W. The atreet is a major street, therefore, we have been using a 50' setback. If it is determined that this street doesn't meet the requirements of the ordinance to require a 50 ' setback, the standard setback of 35 I could be used. 1 Attached are three (3) typical sections: j 1. Section as proposed to date 2. Street Section as proposed with 35' setback , i , ! f i j j , J . J I J . ; . 1 I J l .. . . . 1 . . I . . J J 3. The street section is symmetrical with a 50' setback. RECOMMENDATION: I have, from the start, proposed the developer would pay for the construction of 133rd Avenue because Andover cannot finance 133rd for from three to five years with MSA funds. Rather than have the developer pay for four additional feet of 9 ton roadway for the sake of symmetry, I recommend that a 5' sidewalk, l' off the property line in the boulevard would be more desirable (see typical drawings). COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY ~ ~ ~ (:) ?J .... ""' I'l ~ C ("!--. !'V 'f. 1 \:) \'J . i "-- ~ ....... 1) & N )p .... :ob G3 '\. t ~ ~~ ~ ------ ~ ffi: ~ vJ ~ w "-! ..... ~ ~ t "- \ ~ vr ~ , ~ '\ 0 ~." . .. ~ ~&t . ...... ."', '. ~ ~' (\ ". ; '" -<. D d< ~ ~ ~ -.....: ~ o ....... ~ "' . 1 . ~ l. 1 . . , j J 10 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~-- ! ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~;r ~ ~ '- '" " ~ { ~ ! ~~ ~~ t ~~ ~ '-'~ j . i j 1 ~ .. ~ ~ . . ~ ;; i , j j j . i ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ' ii" ~ ':=J - =:IJ ~ - ~ " ~ " '" .. '" - ~ t' ,. t .. V\ ~ '" ~ "- 1\ ~ ~ ,I." '\ - ]0 . i ~ I i i ~ I . :; o <. 'f. ~ ~ ~ ~~ r~ J. ~ ~ If ~ c>, ~ ~ ~ t o ~ - ~ ~~ ...~ (t ~ -:+=> ~~ ~ G~ ~ o ~ ~ ...... ~I\) (' \1\ .~ w ! ~, c- (! - -. ~ { ... I 1 1 '" tI ... - t=l - "- Qq ..... VJ CI'I , ~ ,,-\ - jO ~ ! -; -! . . . I . I . J I I :----1 ~~ ~~ ~ 01'" "\I ~tW ~ fI\ :t> t~~ ~~ ~~ b ~ o)~ o ~ <::> c... ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' ~ IV ~ .... o ~ - III " .... ~ ~ ~ . Co.. 1 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT September 16, 1986 Discussion Items Engineering Department ~~'I.~~ BV'} ., ITEM 5h NO. Award Bid 86 3 BY: James E. Schrantz Award Bid 86-3 Bunker Lake Boulevard/Hanson Boulevard Sanitary Sewer and watermain. The City Council is requested to review the bids, the reasons for the bid being considerably over the estimate, and consider some ideas on alternative ways of serving the Hanson Boulevard area with trunk sanitary sewer. On the 8th, I gave the City Council a memo from TKDA. Since the 8th, TKDA has looked at a new route for the trunk and also have reviewed to see if a gravity helper would be cost effective. John Davidson has suggested a work meeting to discuss this item. ~ ! . i j i j I 1 I COUNCIL ACTION . 1 10 ! I 1 . 1 J 1 1 MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 16, 1986 ITEM Mining permit request NO. Indian Meadows/Co.Rd.ll BY: James E. Schrantz AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering The City Council is requested to consider approving a mining permit for a borrow pit in Indian Meadows unplatted area. They are proposing three possible locations: (1) 153rd & 7th Avenue (2) West of 152nd & Eldorado (3) North of 151st Avenue & Eldorado The owner's consultant is determining the final house pad elevation at an elevation 6~ ft. above the mottled water table. The contractor for the County 116 project is requesting the dirt. The project quantity is about 70,000 cubic yards. The City concerns are: (1) Maintain an elevation 6~ ft. above the mottled water table. (2) Restoration (3) Haul road (4) Bond and insurance Additional information will be available Monday or Tuesday. The reason for the rush is that the County 116 project has been awarded and the fill is to be placed this year. The soil borings have just been completed on the entire Indian Meadows. The remaining plat is also causing the delay in the necessary information for us to evaluate the grading/mining of this area. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 12. 1986 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROV~ NO. 6. Staff, Commission and AGEND Committee Re orts Finance Department ITEM & NO. b. Approval to Wire Funds B BY: Shirley Clinton I would like to have City Council approval to wire funds directly from our bank to the banks where our bond payments are due. This would enable us to keep the funds invested for a longer period of time. Perhaps the amounts to be wired could still be shown on our City Council bill approval list at the meeting previous to the payments being due, there just would not be a check issued. ~ ~ Recently I had a call from First Trust Company of St. Paul, as they had not received our check and the funds were due that day. They agreed to return our check and I wired the funds to them. It took eight days for them to receive our check (a copy of the void check is attached). i , , ~ j . ~ :! t i j 1 1 j j i . 1 t j l j i j ~ I j i 1 I J COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY ~ '1 . ~ I I o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 16, 1986 ITEM NO.7a R/W Acquisition~ 85-8 James E. Schrantz BY: FOR AGENDA SECTION NO. . . Non-Dlscusslon Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the R/W acquisition from Mrs. Green. The acquisition is along Bunker Lake Boulevard and was required for the watermain that was constructed by Kenco this past summer. Attached is a letter from Bill Hawkins explaining the cost. The acquisition amount is $3,591.00. . i . j ! I , j 1 I I 1 ! , COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY I J 1 i .. t 'J o j , ! ; . . ! j I I 1 . 1 1 10 j ~ ~ , ~ 1 LAW OFFICES OF Burke and ..Hawkins JOHN M. BURKE WILLIAM G. HAWKINS BARRY M. ROBINSON SUITE 101 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA SS433 PHONE (612) 784-2998 August 29, 1986 Mr. James Schrantz Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 Re: Improvement Project 85-8 - Donna L. Green - Parcel 11 Dear Jim: We have been negotiating with Donna Green concerning an easement acquisition on her property along Bunker Lake Boulevard. Ms. Green lost a large number of trees on this property and, therefore, was unwilling to grant the easement without cost. The appraisals by Malcolm Allen indicate his valuation of the loss at $2,841.00. Ms. Green was unwilling to accept this amount, however, in subsequent negotiations she did agree to accept $3,591.00 in settlement of the easement grant. In view of the costs of acquiring this property through eminent domain, I believe the additional $750.00 in compensation would be justified. Would you please submit this matter to the City Council for approval. Enclosed are copies of the appraisals by Mr. Allen. WGH:mk o j . 10 THE ALLEN COMPANY, REALTORS 2516 Fourth Avenue North Anoka, Minnesota 55303 (612) 421-4970 REAL ESTATE AND APPRAISAL SERVICE lmJ -,.........-...."'. MI.S August 1, 1986 William G. Hawldns Burke and Hawldns Attorneys at Law 299 Coon Rapids Boulevard, Suite 101 Coon Rapids, Minnesota, 55433 Re: Andover Water Main Project 85-8 James J. and Donna L. Green Parcel 11 Dear Mr. Hawldns: As you requested, I revisited the Green property on July 31, 1986 to review my previous damage estimate and discuss the matter with Mrs. Green in view of her estimate of the total number of trees in- volved. She indicated she had no objection to the valuation as to land value estimated but thought a larger figure would be appropriate due to the number of trees removed. All the trees have now been cut and it appears there were several substantial size trees lying east of the drive which were removed in addition to several smaller oaks. In my report I alluded to six very large pine trees which were ornamental and part of a landscape planting which I felt was the main significance of the trees removed. However, upon my second inspection, after the cutting took place ~ it is obvious several other trees removed did add some additional value to the site. In view of this I believee an additional damage to the site due to tree loss of approximately $500. 00 should be added to my original estimate of April 17, 1986 raising that figure to $2,585.00 I explained to Mrs. Green that my understanding of condemnation law permitted compensation to the property due to loss in v.alue due to the tree removal but compensation was not calculated by estimating the replacement cost of each and every tree or shrub. I trust you can resolve this in light of my update. If I can be of any additional assistance please call upon me. Page 2 o Yours truly. M5ae~ M. B. Allen P. S. The existing trench came quite close to several large pine trees on the west end of the tree line. exposing some small roots on two trees in particular. Mrs. Green asked me to note these and advise the City of the situation as she fears they may suffer damage due to this trench at a later date. o d- REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION CERTIFICATE Andover Bunker Lake ~:t~ Project No. 85-8 CSAH No. 16 n~~ Project Termini description: Boulevard Parcel No. 11 . '.~ . Description of taking: $ 7,500.00 x 10% IAcre - $ 450.00 IAcre - $ IAcre - $ IAcre . $ IAcre - $ IAcre - $ 13b.UU IAcre - $ IAcre . $ IAcre - $ n 1 R of Temporary Comparable Sales Location of Comparable Sale (;. Damages 1. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. to Building Site Windbreak (Trees) 4-12"-18" Pines, Encroachment on buildings Damage to: Moving building 2-12" Oaks $1,1500.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $2,085.00 Value of Building Acquired Total Appraised Value of Acquisition That on April 17 198fl (date) (s), (I) (Will:) have personally inspected the property herein appraised JIlI1Itx~)c2hGmt~a~dotltii~~Hy ftJl~Jk~il~~bDU~~:m:lI!:<lC:IpmlYC:~~~4~tiJ!iieC~~!asped:icmr.xX8l1mb ~~~i~~x~t~%>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~.~~x~~ Z~R~~~X~i~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXX~tie~X~~~I~~! 6dt~~XJ:1z:ODElUmxJaU~,~~tlS% That (I)(xa) have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised. . That (my) (:I)]ur:) independent opinion of the fair market value of the acquisition as of the 17th day of April , 19 86 is $ 2,085.00 and that the conclusion set forth in this appraisal was reached without collaboration or direction as to value. 10 ~~ ~~ -- -0/13/86 Signature of Appraiser Date ~X<<JCj(<<:XlroeKID6i{~~IanX~XXX ~K~X:{IDfl{YQX~~i' Date . ~ , 0- REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION CERTIFICATE Andover Bunker Lake S~Project No. 85-8 CSAH No. lR n~xbfOr. Project Termini description: Parcel No. 10 Boulevard Appraisal Computation: residential 0.06 Acres of :!':t~e: land acquired@ $ 3,500.00 Acres of Pasture land acquired @ $ Acres of Timberland acquired @ $ Acres of Waste Land acquired @ $ Rods fencing @ $ Acres of Temporary Easements @ $3,500 x 10% @ $ @ $ @ $ IAcre - $ 210.00 IAcre - $ IAcre - $ IAcre - $ IAcre - $ I Acre - $ 46. 00 _ IAcre - $ IAcre - $ IAcre - $ tI.13 Comparable Sales Location of Comparable Sale c- '.. Damages l. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. to Building Site Windbreak (Trees) Encroachment on bUildings Damage to: Moving bUilding $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 256.00 Value of Building Acquired Total Appraised Value of Acquisition That on April 17. 1986 (date)(s). (I) ~ have personally inspected the property herein appraised JUlch6~~hlaIDII'f:f/llZ"delclxtlqDPlnl~ X~~m2Jr~ibux~~i~:j:xatx:fiI[~Xac6c:dlK~K~X~ ~~X~~f~~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~~~~ X~R~*X~~~~~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxi~~K~~X~~~x x~x~Mc~1Ui:k~ml:~:lt~x~~i~x. 0 That (I)(XA) have no direct or indirect present or contemplated future personal interest in such property or in any benefit from the acquisition of such property appraised. That (my) (1UI:Jl:) independent opinion of the fair market value of the acquisition as of the 17th day of April. 19 86 is $ 256.00 and that the conclusion set forth in this appraisal was reached without collaboration or direction as to value. M~ '//~ ~~ . Signature of Appraiser xVBhl&~f~:t"Jill[*lIIH~<<*xxxx 5/13/86 Date o 6Oo~:f~x~lCxXXXxxX>lBl:a o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 16, 1986 ITEM Park Ordinance/Hours NO. 7b BY: James E. Schrantz APPROVED FOR AGENDA~ BY,S 1/ AGENDA SECTION NO. . . Non-Dlscuss~on Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administrative The City Council is requested to modify the Park Ordinance to limit activities after 10:00 PM and before 7:00 AM. Section 2.12 can be corrected as attached. ! . ~ , 1 ~ i . ~ . i ! ~ . . . t J 1 I j 10 COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY j . ! ~ i I ~ o o 2.9 No one shall ride or drive a vehicle at a rate of speed exceeding that posted in City parks or fifteen (15) miles per hour. o 2.10 Drivers shall confine the operation of any motorized vehicle to roads, parking areas, or other areas specifically designated as a temporary parking area by the City Council and/or their designated representative. 2.11 It shall be unlawful for any self-propelled vehicle, including but not limited to motor vehicles as defined in Minnesota Statute, Chapter 169, other self-propelled vehicles, go-carts, and snowmobiles, to travel within City parks, except on established roadways, trails, or other areas designated for such purpose within said parks. 2.12 City parks and recreation areas shall not be occupied or used nor may motor vehicles be parked therein between~o'c1ock p.m. and ~o'clock a.m. except: I() '7 A. When camping. B. When participating in an activity for which a permit has been granted by the City of Andover. 2.13 It shall be unlawful to build or attempt to build a fire except in areas designated for such purpose. No person shall drop, throw, or otherwise scatter lighted matches, burning cigarettes or cigars, tobacco, paper or other flammable material within any park area, on any highway, road or street abutting or contiguous thereto. 2.14 It shall be unlawful to post any sign, placard, advertisement or , inscription, or cause to be erected, any sign on any City park lands, or highways or roads adjacent to a park unless approved by the City Clerk or an appointed representative. SECTION 3 . VALIDITY CLAUSE. If any section, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance~ any section, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional. SECTION 4. VIOLATION AND PENALTY. Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions in this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine and/or imprisonment as established by law. o SECTION 5. The City Council may at its discretion waive sections of this ordinance. o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Non-Discussion Items DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering September 16, 1986 ITEM NO. 7c BY: James E. Schrantz APPROVED FOR AGEN~A \ ~x. B# t..X J AGENDA SECTION NO. v The City Council is requested to approve the street specifications for its rural area streets. The correction suggested by the City Council have been made. This gives the Engineering Department a document to give the contractor and developers, so that the contractors have a specification to go along with the plans. COUNCIL ACTION o MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 16. 1986 ITEM 7 d NO. Award Seal Coat Bid BY: James E. Schrantz . APPROVED FOR AGEN~ ,; AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT The City Council is requested to reject the bid and carry the funding to 1987. The seal coating was advertised twice. The first time we didn't receive any bids. The second time we received one bid. The unit prices are considerably higher than what Ramsey is paying. Ramsey is paying about $0.69/gal. and $13.50/ton. Andover's bid is $1.25/gal. and $21.95/ton. I talked to the low bidder. He said the prices were good for the size project. The bid received is considerably higher than what we have paid in past years. The contractor that has done our work the past years cannot bid until next year. I recommend we reject the bid and carryover the funding to the 1987 budget. . . 4 ~ 1 , i i . 1 COUNCIL ACTION o MOTION BY TO SECOND BY ii ' . , . " o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 16, 1986 j AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR NO. Approval of Minutes AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 Vicki Volk BY: BY: The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: August 13, 1986 Special Meeting (Knight absent) August 19, 1986 Regular Meeting August 26, 1986 Special Meeting August 27, 1986 Special Meeting September 2, 1986 Special Closed Meeting September 2, 1986 - Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION 0 MOTION BY SECOND BY TO o Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone (612) 291-6359 September 4, 1986 /0 cC ~t/.f'-6 TO: Local Officials SUBJECT: Regional Breakfast Meeting Autumn is rapidly approaching and soon it will again be time for the annual series of the Metropolitan Council Chair's regional meetings. These meetings have been held by Council chairs since 1975 and provide an excellent opportunity for you to hear a little about the issues the Metropolitan Council is dealing with, as well as providing a forum to express your concerns and ideas about the Council and its work. I intend to spend some time discussing the Council's priority projects for next year, and some of the metropolitan issues we think the legislature may address in 1987. However, I really hope that most of the meeting can be devoted to hearing your thoughts about what you think we're doing right and what we're doing wrong, and what things we should be doing in the future. My plan is to have at least one breakfast meeting in each county. The Anoka County meeting will beheld on Friday, Sept. 26, at the Seasons Restaurant and Lounge, 12800 Bunker Prairie Park Dr., Coon Rapids. We'll meet for a Dutch treat breakfast at 7:30 a.m. I look forward to seeing you and other public officials from Anoka County at the breakfast meeting. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 291-6453. Please RSVP to Rosemarie Johnson at 291-6391. o An Equal Opportunity Employer o METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300, Metro Square BUilding, St. Paul, TO c... <-- 1/~/f'b Minnesota 55101 ~ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CERTIFICATE OF NEED FOR ANOKA SANITARY LANDFILL EXPANSION The Metropolitan Council's Environmental Resources Committee will hold a public hearing to receive public comments regarding the need for an expansion of the Anoka Sanitary Landfill in Ramsey, Minnesota. You are strongly encouraged to participate in this hearing and provide your input as the committee evaluates the need for the proposed additional landfill capacity. The certificate-of-need application was submitted by Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc., to extend the projected operation of the landfill from late 1987 through early 1990. A new landfill had been projected to open in Anoka County in 1987 to provide needed disposal capaCity, but it is not expected to be available now until 1990 or later. ~ A preliminary Metropolitan Council staff analysis of the need for the proposed expansion, and potentially feasible and prudent alternatives to the proposed expansion, has been prepared. The document evaluates three types of alternatives: use of other landfill capacity within the Metropolitan Area, exportation of the waste outside the region, and the potential to reduce the waste through waste reduction or resource recovery programs. An overview of that staff analysis is enclosed. After the publiC hearing, a response to the comments will be prepared along with a revised staff analysis of the need for the proposed expanSion. These documents will be considered by the Metropolitan Waste Management Advisory Committee and the Environmental Resources Committee prior to final action on the certificate of need. Final action by the Council is expected to be taken Dec.. 18, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION When: Wednesday, October 8, 1986, 7 p.m. Where: Ramsey Elementary School, 15000 Nowthen Blvd. Ramsey, MN (The school is about a mile and a quarter northwest of Anoka. ) Who is being notified: Local officials Nearby residents Trash haulers Landfill operators Metropolitan Waste Management Advisory Committee members How to participate: 1. You may attend the hearing and' offer comments. To register to speak, please call Jane Larson at 291-6500. 2. You may send a letter with comments to: Wayne Nelson Metropolitan Council 300 .Metro Square Building St. Paul, MN 55101 '0 i j Any questions: Call the Council's Solid Waste Division and talk to: Wayne Nelson (291-6406) or Michael Ayers (291-6546). To receive a copy of the preliminary analysis call 291-6464. ovc~v~cw ANOKA SANITARY LANDFILL EXPANSION CERTIFICATE OF NEED BACKGROUND o Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc., is planning a 635-acre-foot expansion to continue operation of the Anoka Sanitary Landfill from late 1987 through early 1990. o The certificate-of-need process addresses only the need for additional landfill capacity and feasible and prudent alternatives to the proposal. Separate processes will provide the opportunity to address design, operation and siting issues. o Metropolitan Council policy specifies three alternatives to be evaluated for feasibility and prudence: 1. Capability to handle the waste within the metropolitan landfill system; 2. Prospects for exporting the waste outside the region; and 3. Potential to address the waste problem through waste reduction or resource recovery programs. PRELIMINARY STAFF ANALYSIS OF THE ISSUE o Remaining landfill capacity for the region is sufficient for less than six years at the current rate of use. o A new.,landfill planned to serve the northern portion of the region in 1987 will not be operational until 1990 or later. o Diversion of the waste from the Anoka Sanitary Landfill may result in: High transportation costs - Higher disposal fees Illegal dumping - Excessive wear on roadways from larger-capacity haulers Unnecessary development of transfer stations and - Risk of a severe shortage of landfill capacity. -over- ',<., .;...' ;J. ... 1... o 99/6 9iHH<IVOd Zl!OOWO .tt1JPu~ AJe~lU~ e~ouv aq~ ~e A~loedeo JO (~aaJ-aJoe ~E9) SpJeA olqno OOL'LZO'L teU01~lPpe ue JOJ paAoJdde aq ptnoqs paeu JO a~eo1J1~JaO V NOIsn1~NO~ ~~V~S XHVNIHI1gHd .066L o~ J01Jd a~seM aq~ JO ~uaoJad OZ ueq~ aJom atpueq o~ pa~oadxa aq ~ouueo saA1~e1~lU1 ~U1tOAoaJ pue U01~onpaJ a~seM - 'A~10edeo tt1Jpuet JOJ paau aq~ a~eU1~ta ~ou ~nq aonpaJ tt1M ~uetd tanJ paA1Jap-aSnjaJ e~ouv a~ - '~sa1tJea aq~ ~e 996L a~et t1~un a~seM A~uno~ e~ouv a~e~ o~ teu01~eJado aq ~ou tt1M ~uetd tanJ paA1Jap-aSnjaJ e~ouv a~ - 'u01suedxa pasodoJd aq~ JO ameJJam1~ aq~ ulq~lM atq1seaJ ~ou aJe SU01~do AJaAOOaJ aOJnosaJ pue uOl~OnpaJ e~seM 0 .P01Jad JeeA-eeJq~ o~ -OM~ e AtUO JOJ teSods1P U1 aseaJou1 te1~u~sqns e etpueq o~ At~ue101JJns papeJ~dn aq ptnOM tt1JPU~ JeA1H ~tg eq~ ~eq~ ~qnop aS1eJ su01~e~1~t te01~ltod pue te10U8U1J 'te~uamuOJ1Aug - .tt1JPue1 JaA1H ~tg a~ ~e AJeSSeOeu aq ptnOM s~uameAoJdm1 e~~ul pue ~U1JaeU1~Ue Meu a^lsua~xg - 'atqet1eAe A~loedeo ~uelo1JJns seq tt1JPue1 JeA1H ~tg eq~ AtUO - :esneoaq aAl~etnoads aJe uOl~eJ eq~ ep1s~no e~SeM aq~ ~Jodxe o~ sel~lUn~Joddo o o ~--=-