HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC March 20, 1986
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March UJ. 1.9RfI
ITEM Award Siren Bids
NO. 5b
BY:David Almgren
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
Ct}
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Building
It is recommended that the bid be awarded to the lowest respo '1 ible
bidder, Lehn Electric, for the amount of $50,101.22 for one 3 phase
unit and 5 single phase units plus the necessary electric for the
installation of the six units.
We have gone through the installation and maintenance manuals of
both siren companies and also looked at the bid specs. We made many
telephone calls to cities that have either or both types of sirens
and also visually checked the sirens.
The following are the reasons the low dollar bid from A.C.A was not
accepted.
1.
The bid spec reads no. chain drives.
which was not noted ~n the bid cover
bid spec.
The ACA has chain drive
sheet as stated in the
2. We checked into the cost of maintenance after the expiration
of the contract. The cost was considerably more for the
A.C.A. which is about $500.00 per unit or $3,OOO.OO~ per
year for 6 units. The Federal units were much less.
3. Comparing the two units, the A.C.A. has more moving parts
than Federal. Moving parts mean mainienance.
4. Lubrication. Both siren manufacturers need lubrication for
proper operation such as both need oil in their gear re-
ducer, which is understandable. A.C.A. also needs Moluk
Alloy #171 graphite grease to grease the drive chain.
5. The spec reads "Factors to be considered in addition to
purchase price is for simple, trouble free operation and
least cost of maintenance. This is not the case of A.C.A.
The maintenance seems very expensive.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
.
Pa{Je 2
con t.
In conclusion, we have determined that the Federal siren is superior
in construction and technology with the least amount of maintenance
required and that the initial cost may be more. However, the Eavings
will be in maintenance after the expiration of the 5 year contract.
In determining who is the lowest responsible bidder, the courts have
adopted the rule that this does not mean merely the lowest bidder whose
pecuniary or financial ability to perfo:r>m the contract is Uwu{Jht best,
but the bidder who is most likely, in refJa:r>d to skill, ability and in-
tegrity, to do faithful, conscientious wo:r>k, and promptly fulfill the
contract according to its letter and spirit. In part, that no mandatory
oblifJation is imposed on the Council to conside:r> the lowest dolla:r> and
cents bid as beinfJ the lowest reEponBib~e ~idder.
.
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
COPIES TO: r; t"y r1 prk /ri t"y AClmi ni !':t"rrit-nr/B'ji 1 din'} Of'f'j cia 1
FROM: Frank Stone
DATE: March 20, 1986
REFERENCE: Warninq Sirens
When reading the manuals on the Thunderbeam and the
Penetrator warning sirens, I see that one of these units
has a lot less moving parts. The Penetrator has a chain
drive, which will need adjusting, grease, oil changes,
more bearings and set screws.
The Thunderbeam has a direct drive using a coupler
with a nylon spider. This is the same type of drive we
have on the air compressor at Pumphouse #1. This unit
has run for five years and we have only replaced the nylon
spider once. These sirens probably wouldn't run that much
in 20 years. The Thunderbeam siren will need the oil
changed in the motor and also a check of the brushes. I would
say that the maintenance on the Thunderbeam should be less
over the years than the other unit.
The Thunderbeam has a design that fits into the area. It
doesn't have the loud speaker look of so many of the other
units made by the same company or others. In talking with
the people of Elk River, they do the jOb with very little
trouble and they are planning on getting two more.
Also, if service would be needed, the people doing the job
are close. The City of Anoka has had no problem with the
service and they have had the same service people over the
last twenty years or more.
JES:vv
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Mavor Windschitl
J
March 20 1986
Additional Items for Agenda 3/20/86
Please add the following items to the agenda:
Public Hearing/85/8
Easement Acquisitions
6g Meeting Date/Group SW28
6h Crooked Lake Cleanup Questionnaire
6i Tournament Application Form
6j CCWD Bill
6k Complaint/Pole Building
Also attached are backup items for 4a, 4c, Public Hearing/
85-8, and 5a, and 5d.
JES:vv
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
*REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HAS BEEN CHANGED FROM
MARCH 18, 1986 TO MARCH 20, 1986 DUE TO CAUCUSES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING-MARCH 20, 1986-AGENDA
7:30 P.M.
1. 'Call to order
2. Agenda Approval
3. Resident Forum
8:00 P.M.
4. Discussion Items
a. Hidden Creek Preliminary Plat
b. Feasibility Study/Hidden Creek/86-4
c. Esther Olson Sketch Plan
Public Hearing/85-8B/Sanitary Sewer
8:45 P.M.
9:00 P.M.
RE,CESS
5. Non-Discussion Items
a. Approve County Plans/Crosstown & Cty. 116
b. CDBG Apporitionment for 1987
c. Joint Powers Agreement Mayor Group
d. Award Siren Bids
e. CCWD Ponding Fees
f. Park Const/Johnson Mining Permit
g. Order R/W Condemnation/86-5
o
~~
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
WHAT'S HAPPENING!!!
o CAUCUSES - March 18th
o The deadline for the newsletter is March 21,
1986 at 4:30 P.M.
o North Metro Traffic Task Force 7:30 A.M.,
March 20th at Anoka Community Room - Jerry
and Jim Schrantz
o March 20th Council Meeting
o March 22nd through 30th, I will be out of town.
o John and Michelle Genereux Research Consultants in
the Social Sciences have been to City Hall and review-
ing Andover's Zoning and land use around Site Q, one
of the proposed landfill sights. I referred them to
Jerry and Jim Elling because they are members of
Andover's Hazardous Waste Committee.
The County has hired various consultants to do an
EAW aand possibly an EIS for their proposed landfill
sites.
o Anoka, Coon Rapids and Andover have now sent
resolutions to Anoka County to study the traffic
on County 9, 116, 242, County 9 at TH10 and Crooked
Lake Boulevard relocation.
The Crooked Lake Boulevard relocation study could
be dropped as Coon Rapids, Anoka County and Andover
have the location established.
o Valerie Nicholson started work today, March 13th.
o Jane Risner will start Monday, March 17th in the
Building Department.
o Larry will be attending the Clerk's and Finance
Director's Conference March 19-21 at the Sheraton
Northwest.
o The League of Minnesota Cities conference is June
17-20 in Duluth. Should we make hotel reservations
for any Councilmembers?
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE March 20. lqR6
ITEM Hidden Creek Pre. Plat
NO. 4a
BY: James E. Schrantz
APPROV"(}
AGEe:,
BY: A
V
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to aPprove the resolution
approving the Hidden Creek preliminary plat.
The Planning Commission and Park Commission recommendations
are attached.
The area for the proposed fire station should not be called
out as park on the plat; the land should be dedicated to the city.
The final screening of the park along Bunker Lake Boulevard
needs to be finalized.
c
The park and county road alignment through the plat have
caused much debate.
We haven't received the county's comments at the time of this
writing but I have talked with Bill Sironen, Assistant County
Highway Engineer, and he hasn't any objection to the plat. His
comments will be available before the 20th.
JES:vv
Attachments:
P&Z Recommendation
Park Board
ARC Committee Memo
Resolution
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
CO U N TY
OF
ANOKA
Department of Highways
Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer
COURT HOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760
March 17, 1986
City of Andover
1685 CroSstown Blvd. NW
Anoka, MN. 55304
Attention: Mr. Jim Schrantz
Regarding: Hidden Creek Preliminary Plat
Dear Jim:
o
We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat of Hidden Creek. The
access to County Road 116/Bunker Lake Boulevard appears
acceptable.
This acceptance, however, is based on two assumptions. One being
that the proposed County Highway will be allowed to be built thru
the wetland to the north of Bunker Lake Boulevard and second that
the County Board will authorize the construction of that piece of
highway.
Without the highway extending to the north the pattern being set
is just like that on Univerity Avenue where few cross streets
ever line up. If this situation occurs, the changes of
warranting traffic control are lessened greatly.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to
contact me.
Sincerely,
~Je~~
William A. Sironen, PE
Assistant County Engineer - Administration
o
cc: John Peterson - Good Value Homes, Inc.
1460 93rd Lane NE
Blaine, MN. 55434
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
o
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Mayor and City Council
City Administrator and City Clerk
Park and Recreation Commission
Mi'lrr.h 6. 1986
Hidden Creek Preliminary Plat
The following motion was made at the March 6, 1986 meeting
of the Park and Recreation Commission for your consideration:
MOTION: by Sabel, seconded by STrootman to accept 8.6 acres
as shown on preliminary plat with approximately 1/2 acres
given from lot 30, block 5 for a total of approximately 9 acres
with the remaining 1.9 acres to be given as cash in lieu of land
at the time of the final plat approval. It is understood that:
0 l.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The developer will grade and seed the two parcels.
The developer will berm the north edge of the park
along Bunker Lake Blvd. (This berm will be
approximately 3' to 4' high).
The developer will install a post-cable fence along
Bunker Lake Blvd.
The developer will install two 20' walkways to the
park area to include grading and seeding of the two
walkways.
If the County denies access off Bunker Lake Blvd.,
the developer will give lotl, block 2 as park area.
Items 1 through 4 upon city Engineer's approval.
Motion carried with 3 yes votes and one no vote.
McMullen stated the he was opposed based on the fact that he
has never been in favor of this park area and the he preferred
2 neighborhood parks and money, due to future maintenance costs
etc.
o
o
o
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO.
,
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HIDDEN CREEK
AS BEING DEVELOPED BY GOOD VALUE HOMES IN SECTION 33-32-24.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published notice thereof, the Planning
and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on the Preliminary
Plat of Hidden Creek; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing and review, the Planning
and Zoning Commission is recommending approval of such plat, citing
as reasons for such recommendation as being 1) the plat is in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; 2) the plat meets city
ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges that a recommendation
has been received from the Park Board; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further acknowledges that the plat
has been reviewed by the Andover Review Committee and the Anoka
County Highway Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the Preliminary Plat of Hidden
Creek, noting the following:
1. A variance will be granted for the length of Hidden
Creek Drive which exceeds the maximum 500 feet for
a cul-de-sac.
2. The developer will be required to go before the City
Council with Phase II of the plat when it is platted.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
1986, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk
o
o
o
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
DATE March 20, 1986
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
4b
BY:
James E. Schrantz
BY:
ITEM
NO.
86-4/Feasibility Study
Hidden Creek
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution
receiving the feasibility report waiving the public hearing,
ordering the improvements and ordering the preparation of
plans and specs for Project 86-4, Hidden Creek.
The escrow amount for the plans and specs is $20,000.
JES:vv
Attach. Res.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF AN aKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFI-
CATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM
DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR HIDDEN CREEK,
IP 86-4.
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 18th day of February,
1986, order the preparation of a feasibility study for "the improve-
ments in Hidden Creek; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and
presented to the Council on the 20th day of March, 1986; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to
a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study
and declares the improvement feasible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby order the improvement of sanitary sewer,
watermain, storm drain and streets with concrete curb and gutter
for Hidden Creek under IP NO. 86-4.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct
the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such
improvement project.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby
require the developer to escrow the sum of $20,000 with such pay-
ment to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and
specifications by TKDA.
and adopted by the
day of
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a Meeting this
1986, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution
was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Discussion
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
M:=a,...,.,h
?n
.
199~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
APPROVED FOR
AG
ITEM Esther Olson Sketch pla
NO. 4c
BY: James E. Schrantz
plan.
The City Council is requested to review Esther Olson's
The Andover Review Committee reviewed the sketch plan and have the
following comments:
OZoninq - R-l
2~ acre lots required with 39,000s.f. of buildable area.
oSoils
The northeast corner of the plat has an area of Rifle muck woody
peat.
The other soils are Sartellfine sand which is usually OK for
development.
oAccess
The 40 to the south appears to be buildable and needs an access
from this property - one is adequate.
The wings (north & south of Uplander) on the west side should be
eliminated.
There is a small piece of developable land to the north of this
property.
There is a strip of what appears to be developable land along
the west side of the plat.
The property owners of the north and west properties should commit
on their access.
Can Mrs. Olson get 14 lots out of this subdivision? One for sure
isn't buildable and two other lots have a strip of Rifle soils
through about the middle of the lots.
Paved streets are required. The urban section may work well here.
oAside
154th Lane should be paved from Nightingale Street.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Mrlr,..l1?O 1 QAk
ITEM IP85-8B - San. Sewer
NO.
BY: James E. Schrantz
~~~~~GrR
BY:~
II
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Public Hearing
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council has ordered a public hearing for 8:00 P.M.
to consider the improvement of sanitary sewer along Bunker
Lake Boulevard from Verdin Street to Quinn Street, Project
85~8B.
The sanitary sewer will extend to the east side of the Menkveld
property as bid with the addition to include the Liesinger
property that petitioned east of M.R. Olson's property.
The Council has asked that the trunk be located on the north
side of Bunker Lake Boulevard vs. the South side as bid.
This shouldn't increase the cost.
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
c
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 20. lClRfi
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
APPROVED FOR
AGi)).
BY(;
ITEM County Plans/Crosstown
NO. Blvd. & Bunker Lake Blvd.
t: _
c
MOTION BY
TO
BY:
,
James E
The City Council is requested to approve the plans
for County Road 18 (Crosstown Boulevard) and County
116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard) as presented by the
Anoka County Highway Engineer.
Crosstown Boulevard/County 18
The plan widens Crosstown from County 20 to TH65
and improves the intersections.
The typical section is 24' bituminous with 8' shoulders.
Bunker Lake Boulevard/County 116
The county is requesting that Andover provide easement
for the road through the area provided along the park.
The County is requesting the plans be approved. The
alignment is 60 feet west of Good Value's plat.
The plans are in the Andover Engineering office for
your review.
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
M;:::ar,...h
?()
.
lQQ~
ITEM CDBG Allocation
NO. 5b
BY: Larry P. Johnson
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
BY:
The Council is requested to approve a CDBG allocation pla
from among the attached options. Jim and I would recommend
Attachment C as the plan that comes the closest to restoring
the funds Andover loses due to the reduced allocation. The
correction will be reflected in the 1987 allocation.
A meeting to discuss the proposal is scheduled to discuss
the special distribution.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
(I
CO U N TY
OF
ANOKA
Office of fire Coullty Board of Commissiollers
COURTHOUSE ANOKA. MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760
March 4, 1986
Mr. Jim Schrantz, Engineer
City of Andover
Community Center
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, Minnesota 55303
Re: T AC Meeting
Tuesday, March 25, 1986 at 2:00 P.M.
Coon Rapids City Hall Community Room
Dear Jim:
There will be a T AC meeting on Tuesday, March 25 at 2:00 P.M. at Coon Rapids
City Hall. The purpose of this meeting is to develop an allocation plan for the
1987 -1989 CDBGprogram. Part of that plan will be a consideration of a special
distribution of 1987 funds to provide special funding for communities that lost
significant amounts as a result of doing a three-year project in 1986.' This
latter consideration is the reason for pursuing the 1987-1989 plans so early.
Please be sure to have discussed the above issues with the appropriate parties
at your community so we may proceed with a plan. Again your attendance or
that of an alternate is very important.
Thank you.
Ann O. Wright
Community Development Coordinator
JOW:sw
cc: Tim Yantos
Dean Doyscher
o
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
"$(I'~I
.~",~""
~~
..' --.
CO U N TY
OF
ANOKA
Office of the County Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760
February 25, 1986
---
-r- ell. 1:
...,.:.... .
I
/J-r'-'/_, ,
17 / i.t:...l.:'
,
C
Mr. Jim Schrantz, Engineer
City of Andover
Community Center
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N. W.
Andover, Minnesota 55303
Re: 1986 and 1987 CDBG Budgets
Dear Jim:
This communication is a follow-up to the February 18th T AC Meeting. The
outcome of the discussion about CDBG funding at that meeting was elimination
of some alternatives put before the group. The two remaining options were a
continuation of the three-year allocation by Target Area practiced during 1984-
1986 or a new three-target-area system which would group communities by
population/poverty/age of housing criteria. The latter would provide one fixed-
amount grant to each community in Areas II or III during the three year
planning period. The larger communities in Area I would receive annual grants.
The details of each plan are attached as A and B respectively.
The other discussion was of the possibility of communities in current Target
Areas III, IV, and V taking steps to compensate the communities which lost
large amounts of CDBG funding in 1986 as a result of taking a three-year
allocation in 1986. Two possibilities were discussed. The first was amending
the 1987 allocation plan to give the communities deeply cut by the 1986 budget
a restoration of 66% of those losses. This would in effect reduce the funding
available to each of those target areas in 1987. The other alternative presented
was that the 1987 funds would be distributed as usual with the communities that
waited until 1986 to complete projects being the first to use the 1987-1989
CDBG Program funds. This plan has the potential to even out the benefits by
reducing risk of cut or eliminated CDBG funding to those communities who
absorbed the losses in the 1984-1986 cycle.
The decisions regarding a possible mitigation of the effects of the 1986 cuts
will be left to the communities by Target Area. This seems most appropriate
since the original three year funding cycle plan was established at that level
through very effective cooperation among the communities. The County might
be able to assist this process by finding sources of 1986 CDBG "loans" for the
communities whose 1986 projects were jeopardized by the cuts.
o
'o$~1
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
o
Page Two.
I have attached a projected 1987 budget that shows the outcome of a plan to
provide a partial "refund" of 1986 losses to those communities who took their
entire 1984-1986 funding in 1986~ (A ttachment C).
Please review the attached materials and communicate these issues to the
community policy-makers so that we may meet again in mid-March to choose a
plan for the CDBG funding process. That meeting will exclude the cities of
Anoka, Blaine, Columbia Heights, Coon Rapids and Fridley since their CDBG
funding will be unaffected by any of the choices.
Communities with other suggestions for program structure are encouraged to
submit those ideas.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely yours,
~hf!)j-~
Community Development Coordinator
JOW:sw
Enclosures
o
, 1967 tDl>G PIlWECTED 1llJlI6[] Attachment A
I WITH STRAIGHT THllEE Y!:A~ 1U000TIlJWCl 0IlNGES TO FORIU.A IN m,IY, Y
FIl.EMlI'E,87!ll1l.J
8Il:l<lJ> ON DISKETTE II
0 TIlROCT CDBG 1987 TARGET AREAS TOTAl TOTAl
AREA CITY F~TOR IUlGET TOTAlS 87 IllJlI6[T88 IIUlIG<T 89 IIIJDGET 87-89
1 ANJ<A 8.1~7 118171 ml7l 118l7J J30S12
I 1Xl. HIS. 8.151. II4ISS 114185 ll4ISS 34=
1 HILLTOP 8.8886 6478 6478 6418 1~13
TOT>I. ----------
8.Jei.,17 2388ll
f{.Alf( 8. 11975 901;;; 901% 901% 270587
COON Rll"1 8. 14lI75 le6l13 18(.013 100013 318831
'RIKEY ~11881 89488 89486 89488 Z!Mw
TOT;;" -------
9.37931 2856%
CENTERV: i.. t}.00435 3276 3<7b 3210 'la2'J
CJRa..E PI 0.01514 11,03 114e3 11402 34218
LEW;l;TQN U; I7B 8813 887J 8813 26618
UN;; Llll<E 8.llZ'ln 22~23 22423 22423 67266
(' SP. LW-E UC~% ZtJei. 283t\; 2e30; 6~13
TOT"- ----------
8.088 66282
(
4 ~R UJm JeI2e JeI2e JeI28 'leJ61
," 4 llE1lEL 8.88\94 3721 3721 3721 11162
4 [URSS U1477 11125 11125 11125 33.l74
4 (]I;{ GROIIE ~81909 14371 1\373 1\371 43136
4 RAI<SEY 0.02812 21188 2118e 21188 6JS4e
. ST.FRAN:I ~811S ~ ~ ~ 25985
TOTI!.. -----
(' 8.11841 89180
II: lXl..n;;\ U2~1 15523 15523 15523 4&S7~
E, E(Tlfl 8.\14835 30392 Jll392 Je392 91175
~1.JlI',f 8. 82808 211501 21150 21150 63450
~ L1ri01J'JO UI8n 1-\138 1'138 1.138 4241,)
---
TOTIl. V 8,18781 812t2 7~ 75.1<\\0 75.l28\l 2259600
Il,h CITlE 1.89219 7"..J20\> 75J2N
D€O< TOTAl
CGiJ'ry E.O. 52S8I1
CW/1' HllJSI'" RE~B 1'_
COlNTV QOfI':;~ 721N
;,
-
..
...
2{,4~
('
T~7'l!.. 87 1817881
.
.
.
0 .
.
.
.
Attachment B
o
Option: Regrouping of target areas in three new areas determined by
poverty/population/housing consideration. Making grants as follows:
Area I: (Per annum grants)
Anoka
Blaine
Columbia Heights
Coon Rapids
Fridley
$110,171
90,196
114,185
106,013
89,488
$510,053
Area II: ($152,000 per year)
Uno Lakes
Spring Lake Park
Andover
Ramsey
East Bethel
Ham Lake
Make 2 gronts
of $76,000 each
during each year.
Area III: ($90,000 per year)
Centerville
Circle Pines
Lexington
Bethel
Burns
Oak Grove
St. Francis
Columbus
U nwood
Make 3 grants
of $30,000 each
during each year.
Advantages
Disadvantages
Larger grants, fewer total
projects (Jess cost for admin)
Risk for fufure years funding.
Small cuts in funding for some
communities.
o
2ti4~
TO:.:..,. 57
1017 000
2"'60~
c
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
March 20, 1986
ITEM Joint Powers Agreement
NO. 5c. Mayor Group
BY: James, E. Schrantz
APPROVE~OR
AGEN u:>
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the attached Joint
Powers Agreement to form a coalition of Metropolitan Communities.
The group has been formed because of the concern about the un-
balanced commercial/industrial development in the metro area.
Attaches is Brooklyn Park's Council action request and the
agreement.
At $0.02/capita, Andover would pay about $230.
JES:vv
Attach.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'.
I. .
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE
ITEM:
0:
ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:
AGENDA SECTION:
ADMINISTRATION
MAYORS' GROUP - 1986 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
B
BACKGROUND:
The Mayors' Group is a coalition of suburban cities, primarily northern
metropolitan communities, currently forming to advocate balanced regional
commercial and industrial development and more equitable public investment
in regional facilities, specifically transportation infrastructure.
Brooklyn Park's Mayor Krautkremer initiateq. the "Group's" formation
because of his concern about unbalanced commerCial/industrial development
in the metropolitan area. Also, Mr. Krautkremer felt more attention
should be given to decisions affecting public investment in major regional
facilities. ' , ' '.
Since July the Association of Mayors has held four meetings to discuss
common issues, organizational structure, and funding arrangements.
Suburban Mayors from 20 cities were invited to debate these issues. As a
result, the Group selected two issues to focus its attention; i.e.,
transportation and economic development. To implement a plan, a two-page
Joint Powers Agreement was drafted and a two cents per capita levy for
full members, $200 for associate members, was endorsed. The attached
Joint Powers Agreement, if adopted, would establish the city as a full
member at a 1986 cost of $ (based on the Metro Council's 1985
population estimate) .
The Association df Mayors could be very effective at promoting the
interests of its members and approval is therefore recommended.
ACTION REQUESTED
MOTION , SECOND
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A JOINT
METROPOLITAN COMMUNITIES AND TO
FEE OF $
TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY
POWERS AGREEMENT TO FORM A COALITION OF
AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF THE 1986 FULL MEMBER
o
.;
o
o
fl"
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
TO FORM A COALITION OF
METROPOLITAN COMMUNITIES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of
1986, by and between the cities and entities of
hereinafter referred to as "Agencies".
the
The Agencies hereto agree to establish an organization to be known as
to promote transportation and economic
development projects.
Any other public entity may become an agency upon approval by a
majority of the then Agencies.
Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental
units to enter into an agreement for the joint and cooperative exercise of any
power common to the contracti ng parti es. Whereas, improvements to transpor-
tation systems serve the Agencies by promoting the public's health, safety and
general welfare and economic development enhances the local tax base thereby
enabling Agencies to provide needed municipal services at acceptable tax rates.
NOW, THERFORE, pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes
Section 471.59, the parties hereto do agree as follows:
1) BOARD OF DIRECTORS. The governi ng body of the coal it i on shall be
its Board of Directors. Each agency shall be entitled to two (2) directors.
Each director shall have one (1) vote. Each agency shall appoint two (2) direc-
tors, one (1) of whom sha 11 be the City Manager or Admi n i strator or other
designee.
Board.
A majority of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum of the
2) MEETINGS. The coalition shall meet on call of the president or by
the Operating Committee.
3) OPERATING COMMITTEE. The Board of Directors shall appoint an
Operating Committee. The Operating Committee shall have authority to manage the
affairs and business of the coalition between coalition meetings, but at all
times, shall be subject to the control and direction of the Board.
.,
o
o
"
The Operating Committee shall meet as needed at a time and place to be
determined by the Operating Committee.
4) FINANCIAL MATTERS. Coalition funds may be expended by the Board.
Other legal instruments shall be executed with the authority of the Board. The
Board shall have no authority to expend funds in excess of the coalition funds
or incur any debt.
The financial contributions of the Agencies in support of the coalition
shall be per capita for full members. Each of the Agencies shall, by February
2nd of each year, pay to the coalition an amount as annually determined by the
coalition based on the most recent metropolitan council population estimates.
The Board may authoi rze changes in the per capita charge for a 11 members upon
majority vote. The annual assessment levy shall be determined by October 1st of
the preceeding year.
The Board may receive financial contributions from private asso-
ciations, entities or financial institutions. Such associations, entities or
instutitions shall then become honorary associate members. Honorary associate
members may send representives to board meetings, but shall not be entitled to
representation on the Board or have any voting rights.
5) WITHDRAWAL. Any agency may withdraw from this agreement effective
on January 1 of any year by giving notice prior to October 15 of the preceeding
year.
6) TERMINATION. The coalition shall be dissolved if less than three
(3) Agencies remain, or by mutual signed agreement of all of the Agencies. Upon
termination, remaining assets of the coalition shall be distributed to the full
members still remaining at the time of termination, pro rated according to their
respective contributions.
7) NOTICES. All notices or other communications required herein shall
be sufficiently given and shall be deemed given when delivered or mailed by
registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following
parties: President, Board of Directors, and Chairman, of the Operating
Committee.
8) AMENDMENTS.
agreement entered into by
agreement.
This agreement may be amended only by written
a majority of the then full member Agencies to this
9) MULTIPLE EXECUTION. This Joint Powers Agreement may be executed
simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which counterpart shall be
deemed to be an original and all such counterparts shall constitute but one and
the same instrument. An originally executed counterpart shall be filed with
Charles Darth, City of Brooklyn Park. Each of the participating Agencies shall
also file a certified copy of a resolution of its governing body authorizing the
execution of this agreement.
~. ....
,I
o
o
"
10) EFFECTIVE DATE. This agreement shall be in full force and effect
upon receipt by Charles Darth. City of Brooklyn Park. of fully executed counter-
parts and resolutions from six (6) Agencies.
CITY OF
By:
By:
CITY OF
By:
By:
CITY OF
By:
By:
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE March /0. 1 qRh
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Building
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
ITEM Award Siren Bids
NO. 5d.
BY: Dave Almgren
BY:
On February 27, 1986 bids were opened for sirens. There
were two bidders, Lehn Electric and Electric Service Company.
The bids are as follows:
Electric Service Company Total Bid
Lehn Electric Total Bid
$60,976
70,306
On the cover sheet from Lehn Electric it was stated: "Our
price includes 6% sales tax as required by law". This may
be a deductible amount because the supplier does not charge
sales tax to Lehn Electric.
Both companies have agreed to 5 year maintenance packages.
At this writing, we have not determined which siren would
be best for the city. We will have the information for Council
at the meeting.
DA:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 20
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM CCWD Ponding Fees
NO.
5e
BY:
James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to consider the Coon Creek
watershed District's 1986 ponding fees.
Attached is the correspondence from the watershed discussing
the fees and a chart showing the 1986 fees - the fees are up
about 3%.
ALSO
The Finance Committee has been meeting to discuss a new proposal
to the ponding fees - the proposal comes from the City of Coon
Rapids.
Coon Rapids, with the watershed staff, have determined what past
development paid for the ponding and improvements and inflated
to today's dollars and come up with a figure that is about 70%
of the ponding fee as proposed for 1986 - then to pay for the
remaining 30% they propose to use the ad valorem tax.
This proposal approaches Andover's proposal of a year ago.
The watershed Finance Committee representative from each
Community is to get their Council's reaction and report back
to the board on March 24th.
The Finance Committee hasn't seen the proposed policy in
writing to date, but as soon as more information is available,
the Council will get copies.
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
CO'ON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BUNKER HILLS ACTIVITIES CENTER
550 BUNKER LAKE BLVD.
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303
MEMORANDUM
TO: Distribution
FROM: Harold G. Israelson, Israelson & Associates, Inc.
RE: Coon Creek Watershed Ponding Fees
DATE: February 27, 1986
Distribution:
William Ottensmann (Coon Rapids)
James Schrantz (Andover)
Robert Wiegert (Blaine)
John Bearden (Comstock & Davis)
Paul Ruud (Anoka County)
1. Enclosed is a copy of the revised Ponding Fee Schedule for 1986.
2. Enclosed is a copy of the development effected by ponding fees.
3. Enclosed is a map showing Pond locations.
4. Topics for discussion:
(a) Fee Schedule
(b) Location of Regional Ponds
(c) Other Items of interest
cc: A 1 Sannerud
Mel Schulte
1.//1..,
Israelson & Associates, Inc.
CONSUlTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS
9100 WEST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY . BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 . PHONE: 884-5371
:0
Jv.ly 12, 1985
Mrs. Doris Nivala, Clerk
City of Ham Lake
15544 Central Avenue NE
Anoka, MN 55303
Re : '?ondi.Q9.~ji
.
Dear Mrs. Nivala:
o
Enclosed is the standard ponding fee schedule and brief
description. The basic problem within the Coon Creek Watershed,
is the control of excess storm water runoff. It is therefore the
intent of the ponding fee structure to require ponding fee,
whenever development of land occurs. The land development may be
in the form of anyone of the following:
1. Residential single family platting.
2. Multi-family or planned unit developments.
3. New or additional building on metes and bounds.
4. Commercial plats.
5. Industrial plats.
6. New or additional building on commercial or industrial
plats.
7. Governmental development including schools, parking lots,
post offices, or other buildings which could increase runoff.
Those areas specifically excluded from ponding ,fee are as follows:
1. County road dedication.
2. State highway dedication.
3. County ditch easements.
4. Outlots on platted property.
5. Existing homes or buildings on platted property.
6. Areas where the total drainage remains on the propertYJ
considering the 24-hour duration 100-year storm.
Other activities which require a watershed permit are:
1. Any culvert installation on county ditches.
2. Any excavation in or abutting the county ditches.
3. Any discharge of water into the county ditch system.
4. Any appropriation of water from the county ditch system.
0/
~
~c
:'
t
,
~
~
l
t
t
F'
,
t
t
,
,
;,
~
(
~
!'
~.
"
fC.
~,
~
l
~
t:
~
t
o
activities in general are:
1. Dumping any refuse or material in the
"banks.
12. .Blocking the flow or restricting flow
. . .
i3 .'Draininganyoffenlli veor potentiaUy,dangerousliqulde
into the ditches.
Since the watershed has no way. of determining whether 'developers
are complying with the permitted activities and since "the intent
is to provide a drainage system capable of transporting runoff
safely through the several communities withing the watershed, ~he
watershed asks your assistance in providing vital information
regarding development. The fee structure includes Ii of the fee
to be retained by the City as an administrative fee. The
interest earned during the 3 month interim holding of the fee may
also be retained by the City.
If you have any questions regarding these ponding fees, you are
cordially invited to either call or write, and we will provide an
answer to the best of our ability.
Yours truly,
~~~~
BGI/skh
Enclosure
CC: Mel Schulte
Al Sannerud
,
3' /"0
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
o
TYPICAL STORAGE REQUIREMENTS
FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
BASED ON CURRENT ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RESERVOIRS
Revised February 5, 1986
RESIDENTIAL PONDING
STORAGE IMPROVEMENT
LOT SIZE AC-FT/ACRE FEE PER ACRE
10 acre .0l3/acre 35.37 '
9 acre .0l3/acre 36.45
8 acre .014/acre 37.89
7 acre .015/acre 39.01
6 acre .016/acre 42.10
5 acre .018/acre , 47.85
4 acre .023/acre 62.30
3 acre .029/acre 78.92
2.5 acre .034/acre 90.51
2 acre .039/acre 100.22
1.5 acre .046/acre 123.25
1 acre .OSS/acre 152.92
0.9 acre .065/acre 170.61
(39,200 sq. ft. )
0.8 acre .072/acre 189.33
(34,800 sq. ft. )
0.7 acre .080/acre 210.14
(30,500 sq. ft. )
0 0.6 acre .090/acre 236.15
(26,000 sq. ft. )
0 RESIDENTIAL PONDING
STORAGE IMPROVEMENT
LOT SIZE AC-FT/ACRE FEE PER ACRE
0.5 acre .102/acre 266.32
(21,800 sq. ft. )
0.4 acre .120/acre 314.17
(17,400 sq. ft. )
0.3 acre .145/acre 379.71
(13,100 sq. ft. )
12,000 sq. ft. .159/acre 416.12
, 11,000 sq. ft. .175/acre 458.77
10,000 sq. ft. .193/acre 506.63
9,000 sq. ft. .212/acre 553.46
8,0)0 sq. ft. .231/acre 605.45
7,000 sq. ft. .251/acre 657.47
6,000 sq. ft. . 274/acre 717 . 81
5,000 sq. ft. .300/ acre 786.47
o
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
TYPICAL STORAGE REQUIREMENTS
FOR
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS
Revised February 5, 1986
. - 11-11-11 II
n
o
o
Z
n
"
"'
"'
~
~
!:
"'
"
'"
%
"'
o
o
-
'"
...
"
-
n
...
:::U1
~
-
=
-
-
=~
,fi,~
!!l
1>
,.:.
I 1111111111
ITIIII: 1I11~
m.lkti
1; 0
..
...
...
X
.
...
...
...
-
(\ (\
o 0
c c
Z Z
.... ....
-< -<
,., V>
o );!
Z ~ ~
)>
o
:r
(;)
:r
~
-<
V> C
-I
~ ~
m :r
;;;: (;)
c :r
Z ~
'" ~
:r
(;)
:r
~
~
~@)[]]0
~
N
en f - I :xJ I I I
- . I
-4 I (X) .......
0 ()m~(')- "0 CJJ 0
:IJ ~ 0 ;:;:z :xJ
C:~'<C:CD 0 ...., c: r-
)>> ::::J 0 ::!;
::::J CD .-3 0 a. .., CD m
zG> a..., -. tT CD S>>
- S>> (I) 3 .., (I) <0 .... G>
em .., ::J" -. ~ < CD CJJ
'< CD en o' .... m
"tJ:IJ a. .., :xJ .., Z
c:
.- 0 CD () e c>>
Om .., (I) ....
CD CD c:
zen <0 "0 .., ..,
em S>> 0 < CD
-. (I)
" en:IJ ::::J 0
- a. ..,
Ci) < (I)
c -
:xJ 0
m :0
...... en
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
Milrr.n 7.0. 1 qRfi
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
Park Const/L. Johnson
Mining Permit
5f
BY: James E. Schrantz
The applicant, Park Construction, has requested to be on
this agenda to request that they be allowed to start the
process by moving in equipment, clearing, stripping topsoil,
etc. before the final Special Use Permit for mining is issued.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on March
25th to be referred to the City Council April 15th unless the
procedure is waived.
The borrow material is for a project in Fridley.
I have advised them that I doubted the Council would allow
them to start before the process has been completed.
The city ordinance doesn't mention a bond to be sure the site
is restored.
If it is a city or county project, the project contract can
ensure the restoration.
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
.
. .
o V,.
CONSTRUCTION CO.
. COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL EXCAVATING
. ROAD BUILDING
. PILE DRIVING
.SEWER,WATER
INSTALLATION
. BRIDGES
. GOLF COURSES
. SUB DIVISION AND
LAND DEVELOPMENT
. EQUIPMENT RENTAL
· ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
7900 BEECH STREET N.E. · MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55432 . TELEPHONE 7B6-9800
March 12, 1986
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Gentlemen:
Park Construction Company is presently in the process of obtaining an
excavation, removal or grading permit ,and a special use permit for a
Mr. Lee Johnson. The property is located on Bunker lake Road east of
Hanson Boulevard (Section 36, N.E.! T32N, R24W).
We are requesting a variance to begin with planning commission approval
on March 25, 1986 prior to final council approval on April I, 1986.
It is our intent to fully comply with all city ordinances and proceed
with application approvals until final approval is granted.
Your consideration is greatly appreciated and we look forward to working
with you soon, If you have any questions or concerns, please call me
at Park Construction Company 786-9800 exten~ion 21. '
Sincerely,
PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Chuck Rugroden
Project Manager
o
sh
- AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER _
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE March 7.0. 1 gRf)
ITEM
NO.
Order R/W Condemnation
IP86-5 Hanson
5g ~'..:I
BY: James R. Schrantz
APPROVED FOR
AG(~
BY"
"
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution
authorizing the City Attorney to start an eminent domain
process for the acquisition of R/W along Hanson Boulevard -
161st to 181st Avenues.
The eminent domain process has a positive side - equity in
acquisition, I believe a 5 year time on capital gains and
gives the county a definite date they can start construction.
,
COUNCIL ACTION
c
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND AUTHORIZING
THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY PROCEEDINGS IN EMINENT
DOMAIN.
WHEREAS, the city Council of the City of Andover has
heretofore determined that it is in the interests of the City
to construct a street improvement along Hanson Boulevard align-
ment extended; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to acquire certain easements
on Hanson Boulevard between 161st Avenue and 181st Avenue for .\
street construction.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1. Acquisition by the City of a street and utility ease-
ment over the property described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof is necessary for the
purpose and construction of street improvements.
2. The City Attorney is authorized and directed on
behalf of the City to acquire a street easement
over, across and under the properyt descrioed in
such Exhibit A by exercise of the power of eminent
domain pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117.
The City Attorney is further authorized to take all
actions necessary and desirable to carry out the
purpose of this resolution.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by
the City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 1986 with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution
and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon
said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
o
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk
*
r BIROS y
~ ~
~ z ~ z ~
~ z ~ ~ ~
~ z ~ z z
~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ 0 ~ Z ~
~ Z ~ ~ Z ~ W Z Z ~ 0 ~ W ~ 1> ~ ~ Z
Z Z ~ Z 0 Z Z Z Z ~ Z 0 0 ~
0; ~ 0 Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 Z Z Z Z 0 ~ Z
~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ 0 Z 0 ~ ~ ~ Q 0 ~ ;;: ~ ~ W Q 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q ~ ~ 0 U Z ~
Z 9 0 Q Z Z ~ ::l z z 0 ~ 0 0 ~ Q ~ 0
0 Z " Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W w iD ~ ~ > Z Z ~
~ W ~ W Z ~ Z ~ ~ Z W ~ Z W ~ ~ ~ Z '"
- ~ Z Z ~ il 5 z ~ 0 Z ~ Q 0 ~ ~ 3 m ~ @ ~ z '" ~ Q ~ ~
N > ~ w ~ ~ z ~ z z ~ w ~ ~ w ~
" > 0 Z ., Q Z Z 0 W Q U m . N > X ~ z
GROVE~, At~OI)A Cf/) .L...........o..
-~ ,
II, 2'
').i)} ~Sr"': 'I
' M~: ~ ~fI~ ,--.r /?___
"f-- - LI
'4 ' \/
/ I ~
Auodn< )) /
.,,;,;Js:s//V I
d/
i ,,\ I
'-----\\ I
'\: ----
./~I
I II
I I
I I
----I-
Ii;
iE<H-'t~/r ~.-
I
i
I
-""-:::::c-"'::--- I
--""""l?:::",,0.__
--r~i" . _,
-1 - ,'" , LT I
~j ~ /( , f' ~' ~1f~' ~ ' I -:y---;- I )
J ~~f' , ;iL' lwOGc' , ---- -----r--
" , ' ,7, I ~A hr.------,! I
--'- I -II-- ~...;>/ "", .
u+. 'l' .! ". ~ I " r---...,.~ I
i:"~"-',;,f,,5 ~n
I / I I --..".. ~-,
1 ~"I, N' I Iii ~
1ts , I i
/1:, , ~~'I -~---L---___I__
I:.' I --
,~p"2 ' ); ~ I {I
'llloG~~ . ~, I
-'i" \ " I
I l4 ,I-- ,', i
z ~ ~ '\ '\
- -- - 43 "-,
z 91 '\ '\ I
"
.-- ::: ~4- I
, 0
,4 I
~,
,A
,- :::-
I "
I "
,~,
I "
"
"
I "
"
, ,
, ,
, ,
~
I
I
I
7
I I
-4--
;i
it
- -----
- ~---- .
I--~~-,
I I
I
I
".
.--
"
-
'-
,
'----
I
I
I
I
-I ~I '
~~;-~S)" '
_~k~t41 ~sl ~'~/- l!rll
sll
,II, ~p?, ! 't
)_ 15
I ',~,:
I I ,'1,
I I' "
----""8t----- "'--"
~I "~fJ
I "
,',
-.., , ,
, -
--.::.::.::-.::
!I
-
/)
~/
I ,,'
rf~
i
I
- -
- -
-
.---
I
I
!
I
I
I
i
.
~
/
/
II If-:
I
..~-ANOI6t-----
f--. ~--lt=li"~"r.ll\
T ~~_r"\
I
i
_COUIITYstAtt
..~.
. ----t--.
--,
'"
...... '- L....:S 13
, , f----
I ' "
-- ,I~---~.~
i :t
i
~
I 'r
! II
I,
,
o
o
~
"'"
':...
~~
7
,h
.1a'n..~lIw.~.
~
~
~
-..;:'. ....
f----
h
I---
0'
o
!!!
I
I---
f----
f----
I---
I---
o
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
March 20, 1986
AGENDA SECTION Staff Items
NO. 6.a.
Administration
ITEM Purchase Phone System
NO. 6.a.
BY:
Larry P. Johnson
BY:
The council is requested to authorize the purchase of our existing
Comkey telephone system from AT&T. The purchase price of existing equipment
is $951.00 as itemized on the attached purchase agreement. The savings to
the city will result in the decrease in cost of the monthly charge which is
now $109.77. Upon purchasing the system our monthly cost will decrease to
$24.50 or a monthly savings of $85.27. Our payoff will be in a little less
than one year.
The existing telephone system is presently meeting our needs and should
for quite a while since it is able to handle 7 1 ines and 18 telephone sets.
At present we have four lines and seven sets. We are adding a telephone for
Valerie Nicholson and that will make 8 sets. We don't have the people to
answer any more lines at this point.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
TO
-
- Agreement
~ AT&T Equipment AIS 1362A
{a.54)
-
-
:"ransaction Type Contract No.
~heck appropriate transactions GS1797535 340 t;'90~
Contract Terms
~ EQuipment Purchase 0 AT&T-IS Financing o Term Plan l?J Maintenance Agreemenl Lj'-IY
DOSS Supplemenl No(s),
~c::; ~r/ ~ V'g ;:;l.... !H
fl'NM\;ER ~ I ry nFF/0E<.. AT&T-IS Office cor-:;: f3 W C
;lling ~rS NW CPI ' ~ ilL Room No. I Floor No. Address /V}ETJ2J) RL-VD Room No. (rt
' (", 'lr.::l:::JoUJNJ LYL /}.:)/;/
~ifJN DD VEf!.. /flN S9l~~ CilY,/Y1 PL" /Y\ tV s!N3~
~ontact Telephone ~L-::JARVI ()J5F:tJ d bi::5cg d ~ - s 371'
3eneral Order Information
i(1~rA{t'k'EY 1fX E/PEC OTY Tolal
Total Total Total Monthly
Purchase Install. Monlhly Mainr
t))/'(mDN aU I'P c&:f) Rf ~E / -23,), uD - - s-~~
2LtNtE ~(J U I P 1~00BFkGG 4- ..:)1). (J{) - - I, 07>
3'/1 fkR.. s~ ~o f5F k!C,!- I t)1; ,OD - ~ /.~<:
O)/'(,5bt-E ~ WI GrrPKH'1+'I-. I 47.M) - --- J.~
5'"] / ~ Sc=T'. E:3; TI 1::..'9.. 'Y. ..L ..L / .;:: 273, ov - - /;),.;l~
6'1J~ II f) ~<:'. J:33/ TPK9. ''X'+-J- ,J , 1") =? ,c,'T() - - -_-? S7l
7,
8,
9,
10
11,
12,
~em~Le' TN !if)C5 -fisT' Total This Page 19S-f. iJ{) .:l.l-/; ,~U
,'~' Subtotaf ,From Attached ( ) .....:..... ' ' fj i~ "_ . '~;' ' .""
r.;;~ ANT\{ f'1 f} ) N ffiv Ii f\I" ;:- ...................
Additional PagelS)
-- 9' [) D9v<: /1, r~ B{t-.~-<"'''=- All Prices Ind rates Sub T olal I g" I 0'2> $ .2. t)SO
abov..r. exclusive 01 $ $
Instlll./Oel. Olle "'../use lUes. TOTAL A TOTAL 8 TOTAL C TOTAL D
Complete This Section for Fin.need PlJrchase
;ustomer acknowledges receipt of the Financing Terms & CondillOns 10 i $ $ $
"hIS Aareement. Issue Date '.~ Initials._ TOlal Taxes $
I Shipping
1, Total Equipment Price (Total Column A) $ (Total Transponalion CostS) $ $ $ $
I
2 TOlallnSlallation Price (Total COlumn B) I $ Filina or Other Fees $ $ $ $
3 Total Cash Price (line 1 + line 2) I $ Credits/Down Payments (COP) $( ) $( ) $( I $( )
I $ 95(, (]1 - - $.2 '-I-Su
4 Total Tax . $ G,and Tota' $ $
5, Total Shipping I $ Complete This See lion for WI,lna
C AT&T-tS o Customer
6 Olher (Specify) I $ ~n Place o Other
7, TOlal Down Paymenls/Credils (COP Block) $ ( ) Complete This Section For Equipment Installation
8 Cash Price Balance (Line 3 + 41 ... 5 ~ 6 - 7) $ :::; AT&T-IS ~ Customer
9 Monthly PaymenlS 10,$ ~n Place o Other
~ 1 . Time Price Balance (Line 9 x Line 10, $
12, Customer Rale % Complete This Section for Maintenance
13 Time Price Dlllerenhal tline 11 - Lrne 8) $ Effective Dale Term Plan I Warranly Coverage
14 Time Sale Price (line 1 1 + Line 7) I $ X 8 AM.S PM Mon-Fri C 24 Hrs. 7 Days
Complete This Section fo, Te,m Plan C-~ Depot I Mail-In
Effective Dale Post Warranty Maintenance
J 12 Monlh :; 24 Monlh = 48. Month ~= 72 Month y.... 8 AM.S PM Mon.Fri w 24 Hrs. 7 Days
: Monthly (3 Monlh MInimum) :~ O!ll~r :: DepoI I Mail-In ,
:VITOMER'S SIGHATURE SElOW INDICATES CUSTOMER HAS READ AND AGREES WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE
~
o
o
>4UEOF.THESE TEIlllS AND CONDITIONS APPLY TO TIlE ABOVE SPl!CIFIED PRODUCTS ANn UAVIr.~~ U W~' I U 41' JtIJ..~nlJ~N" ".,.,...
o
o
;
!
o
o
DATE March 20. 1 gRfi
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
APP~~EDI FOR
AGEN"A 1\
BY: ;) \J~
V
ITEM Uniforms/PWD
NO. 6b
BY: Frank Stone
The City Council is requested to approve the following policy:
UNIFORMS
The City of Andover will provide the initial uniforms for
employees of Public Works after their probationary period
has been served. The City will provide 3 short sleeve shirts,
3 long sleeve shirts, 4 pair of pants, 1 coverall, 1 jacket,
1 jacket liner and 3 summer tee shirts.
It is the responsibility of all employees to keep uniforms
clean and patched. All emblems, such as name tags or City
emblems, must be on and in proper location. There shall be no
altering of any uniform. Uniforms are to be used on job related
duties and not to be worn after hours. This ip only to reduce
additional wear. Uniforms that are abused due to something
other than job related or after working hours may not be re-
placed at City cost.
Beginning January
will have uniform
$50.00 for 1987.
two years.
1, 1986 through December 31, 1987, personnel
replacement allowance of $50.00 for 1986 and
This totals $100.00 per person over the next
All uniforms will be of dark brown pants and light shirts with
a dark brown jacket and dark brown coveralls.
All damaged clothing will be turned in to the Public Works
Superintendent for replacement in December of each year. The
Public Works Superintendent will receive quotes each year and
submit them to the City Administrator for approval to purchase.
When an employee leaves employment from the city for any reason,
the uniforms must be returned to the City.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
M.:::.,....,..."h
H'IHi
')Q
.
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
o
Directional Signs
6c
By:James E., Schrantz
BY:
I requested directional signs to be placed on TH10 and
65 to show Andover was off various interchanges. I
talked to Joel Katz by phone and we discussed Andover's next
exit at Round Lake Boulevard or next 3 exits to cover Hanson,
Crooked Lake Boulevard and Round Lake Boulevard. On the
phone it sounded possible.
Wayne Anderson of Rademacher & Associates thought the signs
were for the asking.
The letter indicates we will not get directional signs.
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
'J
.,..
(:;G
fl"'\~%i'f ~
)iO !;i
1. f
~ ,f
,. OF Tl\~~
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
'lju/JY6
(612) ~z~
593-8544
March 10, 1986
James E. Schrantz
City Engineer/Public Works Director
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Andover Directional Signs
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
We have reviewed your request of February 12 for Andover directional
signs on T.H. 10 and T.H. 65. Mn/DOT criteria for the installation
of such signs generally excludes your city's situation. Therefore,
we believe it is necessary to refuse your request for the following
reasons:
Signing which displays city names in urban/suburban areas is
usually limited to assisting the motorist in directional orien-
tation. These destinations are also normally located on the
trunk highways. We try to limit these displays to minimize
distractions and to help avoid diverting the driver's attention
from their primary task of driving.
- City name signs used at interchanges and intersections in the
metropolitan area are used primarily as a means to assist the
driver in making decisions. These city name signs are partic-
ularly helpful for people who have a weak concept for direction.
(For example, some people have no idea as to whether they should
select "East 10" or "West 10." They would tell you that they
just want to go toward Anoka even if their destination is SQre-
where other than Anoka.) While the city names may be helpful,
we do not use them at all of the interchanges in our district.
At these locations, signs are usually limited to a route nuroer,
a direction (if there is more than one exit), and a street rume
if there is one.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
....@
o
'.J -4h
o
James E. Schrantz
March 10, 1986
Page Two
Cities which are identified on signs for the purpose described in
the above paragraph must be selected so that that particular pur-
pose is served. We, therefore, select cities that have major high-
way junctions or major river crossings. Cities which may be a
destination of a large portion of the traffic (whether that be the
final or intermediate destination) would also be considered. We
also consider those cities that have become known over several
generations as a destination or intermediate destination.
- Cities with a major central district are more likely to be identi-
fied than those that do not have a central district or "downtown."
Andover does not have a well defined central district or downtown
and, in that respect, we do a disservice to motorists by installing
signs that do not direct them to a specific location.
Given the above considerations, we believe that signing for Andover can-
not be justified. We do appreciate your concern that Andover be given
appropriate recognition and we regret that we must make a decision that
does not meet that need. We believe that a decision more in your favor
would be inconsistent with our guidelines and would eventually require
us, in fairness, to install far more signs than that for which there is
available space on the right-of-way.
r---3Sin::~relY'
o;;s-;C. AJ ~ ~
J. S. Ka _~/
District Traffic Engineer
JSK:pn:LOM
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE M~~~h ~Q. 19Qa
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Commission Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
APPROVED FOR
AGENt~
BY:!:
V
ITEM Park Commission Vacancies
NO.
BY:
Larry P. Johnson
.
6d
It has come to my attention that there are three vacancies on the Andover
Park and Recreation Commission:
1) Merlyn Prochniak resigned on 12/20/85
2) David Szyplinski resigned on 12/31/85
3) Bill LeFebvre resigned on 3/14/86
The remaining four members are: Stuart Kinkade - Chairman
Marce McMullen
Larty Strootman
Gretchen Sabel
Should we be advertising to fill these vacancies? Or does the council wish
to reduce the size of the Park and Recreation Commission? Please advise.
.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
M;:::arro'h'
?n
.
'91Hi
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGENr I Q
BY: ~ lP
V
ITEM
NO.
Senior Transportation Bus
be-
Administration
Larry P. Johnson
BY: '
I have been contacted by Steve Klein of the Anok,a County Community Action
Program offering the City of Andover a free van to be used for senior
transportation. The van is a 1977 Dodge extendavan with a hydraulic lift to
handle wheelchairs. It has been reconditioned and has a new engine.
A similar van was recently given (sold for $1..00) to Linwood Township for
the same purpose. The township then contracted with Anoka County to operate
the van providing transportation services to their senior citizens. The county
evidently has funds to operate such a program. Natalie Haas is the chairperson
of a county transportation committee that would fund such a program.
First, is the council interested in getting involved in this type of program?
If so, would you like either Steve Klein and/or Natalie Haas to attend a
council meeting to further explain the program? It is my understanding that
there would be no cost to the City of Andover.
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Approval of Minutes
DATE March 20. 1986
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
8
BY: Vicki Volk
The City Council is requested to approve the following
minutes:
February 25, 1986 - Special Meeting - Full Council
March 4, 1986 - Special Closed Meeting - Full Council
March 4, 1986 - Regular Meeting - Full Council
March 12, 1986 - Special Meeting - Full Council
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. HANDOUT
DATE March 20. 1986
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ADD ON
BY: James E. Schrantz
ITEM
NO.
"
v
The City Council is requested to approve the attached
letter.
I h~ve included the land in Section 32 north of 140th
Avenue. This is or was Good Value's property (Outlot
A is now the City of Andover's.)
The minutes of the 4th of March said to exclude the
Chutich pond and the Good Value property. I assumed
the motion meant the property of Good Value near the
Chutich pond.
I included Out lot A because it is a part of the Rosella
pond adjacent to Rosella's Addition.
JES:vv
Attach.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
March 21, 1986
John Stine
Department of Natural Resources
Metro Waters
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, Minnesota
Re: Public Waters Boundary/Ordinary High Water
Dear Mr. Stine:
The City of Andover is requesting that the DNR review
the properties in Sections 29, 30 and 32 lying west of
Round Lake Boulevard (County Road 9), north of 140th
Avenue, east of 7th Avenue (County Road 7), and south
of 146th Avenue, all within the City of Andover, Anoka
County, Minnesota, to determine the boundary of any
public water, and establish an ordinary high water
elevation.
The City Council authorized this request at the March
4th Council meeting.
We will provide your department any information from our
records that may be helpful in making your determination.
Please contact me when you start the work.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ANDOVER
James E. Schrantz
City Engineer/Public Works Director
JES:vv
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE March 20. 1986
ITEM Approval of Meeting Dat
NO.
BY:
James E. S
AGENDA SECTION
NO. HANDOUT
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
MOTION BY
TO
Group SW28 has requested a meeting for April 8th
to discuss the landfill study.
Background
On March 4th the Council approved 3/2786 for a
meeting date.
The 27th of March wasn't acceptable to them.
They have suggested April 8th as a new date.
We will get back to them 3/21/86 if Council
approves the new date.
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
APPROVED FOR
AGEND
BY:
~
o
CO-ON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BUNKER HILLS ACTIVITIES CENTER C C-
550 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. ~ I .. h ~
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 ~ zo /'f"J:,
MEMORAN DUM _ -- ~
Se
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Coon Creek Watershed District Board
Harold G. Israelson, Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
Meetng at City of Coon Rapids concerning Watershed Ponding
March 13, 1986
In attendance were: William Ottensmann, City of Coon Rapids
A 1 Sannerud
Harold G. Israelson
The purpose of the meeting was to review the Planned Ponding Fees and to
determine a logical basis for placing a portion of these fees on general
taxes.
The schedule listing previous improvements and repairs was reviewed with
particular attention being paid to the cost of improvements. The reason for
using past improvements was that additional development creates additional
run-off which wi 11 overwhelm the capacity of the existing ditch system. An
improvement must be made to accomodate these additional flows, either by
increasing ditch hydraulic capacity or by providing the proposed regional
ponding. Considering an average lot in the City of Coon Rapids using 11 ,000
sq. feet per lot, the cost per acre would be approximately $460.00 for
ponding fees. The historical average for improvements for these ditches has
run approximately $305.00. The rough average of cost of improvements versus
ponding fee is between 65 and 70 percent. Therefore, it is determined that
the ponding fees should be approximately 70% with the 30% coming out of
general revenue.
o
A concern was expressed regarding the legal position of both the Watershed and
the City of Coon Rapids in the event that a developer would refuse to go along
with the proposed ponding fee guidelines. It was determined that the
developer could conceivably sue the watershed or the City or both together.
There was some concern as to what legal basis the City and Watershed would
have to defend their position. It was determined that Al Sannerud and Bill
Ottensmann would contact the Watershed Attorney and City Attorney to arrange a
joint meeting of attorneys and interested members of the finance committee, to
review the possible ramifications of a lawsuit.
If the ponds were installed, a time release mechanism would have to be
installed on the discharge of the pond to insure that the discharged would not
occur during the peak flow in the ditches.
cc: A 1 Sannerud
Mel Schulte
Gary Steen, City of Ham Lake
William Ottensmann, City of Coon Rapids
Larry Johnson, City of Andover
James Schrantz, City of Andover
John Bearden, Comstock & Davis
Frank Murray
File
AGENDA SECTION
NO. ADD ON
ITEM
NO.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE M~r~h ?O, lqRh
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Park & Recreation
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
Tournament Application
c
MOTION BY
TO
BY: Vicki
BY:
The Park and Recreation Commission would like
acceptance of the attached form for an application
to be used for tournament field usage. See motion
made in March 6, 1986 minutes.
They also made a motion that the monies obtained would
be used for maintenance of parks.
Thank you for your consideration.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
v
. l
t
o
o
~ 0{ ANDOVER
ADULT (Over Age 18)
SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT APPLICATION FORM
(Please Pring or Type All Information)
NAME OF TOURNAMENT:
TOURNAMENT SPONSOR
TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR:
(Must be a resident of Andover)
DIRECTOR'S PHONE:
(Home)
(Office)
DIRECTOR'S ADDRESS:
DATES OF TOURNAMENT:
MONTH
FRI
SAT
SUN
PARK USAGE AND FEES
1.
Andover Community Park Complex
Usage Fee $150.00 per field per
tournament
Tournaments may be held at Andover Community Park Complex only.
No applications will be accepted before January 3rd and will be processed
on a first come-first served basis.
All requests for tournaments MUST be made before March so that requests
can be approved by the Park and Recreation Commission at the second
meeting in March. All fees must be paid within one week after Park
and Recreation commission approval pursuant to the above listed
schedule of rates. Late applications will be considered as availability
permits.
A $300.00 damage deposit fee is requiered one week before the
tournament date to ensure facilities are cleaned up and any equipment
damaged or lost by renter would then be deducted from deposit fee.
The $300.00 will be returned after inspection by the Parks Foreman.
This is a separate fee from the Park Usage Fee - The Park Usage
Fee is ~OT returned.
If City personnel are required by the reserving league to maintain the
fields at any time between the hours of 6:00 p.m. on Friday and 10:00 p.m.
on Sundays, a charge of $20.00 per hours shall be made. Such costs
shall be in addition to the above listed fees.
BEER LICENSES - Must be obtained for the sale of non-intoxicating Malt
Liquors pursuant to the requirements of Ordinance #28.
(See attached)
;...,.
l~
c::> The City Council has adopted the following refund policy:
"Fees for tournaments shall be paid within one week after approval by the Park
and Recreation Commission of the tournament. If the tournament is cancelled up to
six weeks prior to the date of the tournament, one half of the park usage fee will
be returned. If the tournament is cancelled withw SlX weeks of the date of the
tournament, the fee will not be returned. In the event that another sponsor requests
the use of the facilities after a tournament has been cancelled, the new sponsor must
pay the full amount and the original sponsor will be refunded the total minus any
administrative costs incurred by the City."
If further information is needed, please contact the Park and Recreation
Commission Secretary at 755-5100. All application forms can be obtained
from and returned to the City of Andover, Park and Recreation Commission,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W., Andover, Mn. 55304
DATE
SIGNATURE OF TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR
o
....' i
"\
o
o
CO U N TY
OF
ANOKA
Department of Highways
Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer
COURT HOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760
6t.
o/~iJ/8'b
March 14, 1986
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Anoka, MN. 55303
Attention: Mr. Jim Schrantz
Regarding: CR #116 Anoka County Project No. 85-03-116
Dear Jim:
Please find enclosed one (1) copy of the complete plan for the
construction of County Road Number 116 between CSAH #9 (Round
Lake Boulevard) and CSAH #7 along with one copy of a resolution
approving the plans for the construction of CR #116. Please be
advised that we would request that you submit these plans and
this resolution to your City Councils at the next regular meeting
of the those Councils to consider this resolution.
If you need to discuss this issue further, or would like
additional information, please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
S ncer~
.Jon G. Olson, PE
Assistant County Engineer - Construction
Commissioner Natalie Haas
o
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
o
showing prOP9sed alignment, profiles, grades and cross-sections
for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County
Highway No.
within the limits of the City of
116
ANDOVER
as a County Project have been prepared and presen~ed to the Ci~y.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things
approved.
DATED THIS
DAY OF
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of
City of
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City
Council of . at a meeting thereof held
in the City of , Minnesota, on the
day of , 19 , as
disclosed by the records of said City in my possession.
(Seal)
o
o
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
CITY of ANDOVER
James E. Schrantz Cit Administrator
l1.:Iarron ] 9 ] 986
Addi~ion~l T~pmR for Agpnd~ ~/?O/R~
Please add the following items to the agenda for 3/20/86:
Meeting Date/Group SW28
Tournament Application Form
Crooked Lake Cleanup Questionnaire
85-8 Easement Acquisitions
Letter to DNR
Thank you.
JES:vv
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
March 20, 1986
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
ITEM Project 85-8 Easement
NO. Acquisitions
Administration
BY:
Larry P. Johnson
BY:
The City Council is requested to accept the deeds dedicating various
easements relative to Project 85-8 as outlined on the attached correspondence
from Bill Hawkins.
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
LAW OFFICES OF
o
Burke nltd ffnwkilts
SUITE 101
299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD
JOHN M. BURKE
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
BARRY M. ROBINSON
COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA 55433
PHONE (612) 784-2998
March 6, 1986
Larry Johnson, Clerk
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Project 85-8 - Easement Acquisitions
Dear Larry:
Enclosed herein please find original and one copy of the follow-
ing deeds which need your signature on the back accepting the
easement for the City of Andover. Please sign these documents,
affix the City's seal and return the original to my office for
recording. You may retain the copy for your file.
1. Deeds dedicating Parcels 16 and 28 signed by Gilbert ~.
Menkveld individually and Parcel 14 as president of G.M.
Investment Company.
2. Deeds dedicating both a temporary and a permanent easement
on Parcel 27 signed by James Liesinger and Arlene Liesinger.
3. Deeds dedicating both a temporary and a permanent easement
on Parcel 22 signed by Roger Nutt and Dianne Nutt.
4. Deeds dedicating a temporary easement on Parcel 15 signed by
Clement W. Jankord as partner of B.J.Y. Properties.
5. Deeds dedicating both a temporary and a permanent easement
on Parcel 3 signed by Philip A. Oseid as Trustee Board
Chairman of Meadow Creek Baptist Church.
{IrO'
William G. Hawkins
Andover City Attorney
o WGH:mk
Encs.
~ ~..
o
DATE March 20, 1986
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. HANDOUT
ITEM Crooked Lake Cleanup
NO. Questionnaire
BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the attached
questionnaire that has been developed as a result of
the January 16th meeting at the Activity Center.
If the questionnaire is approved as is or as changed,
the plan is to mail to the same residents as before,
that is the lakeshore residents and at the same time
as Coon Rapids mails to their residents.
Coon Rapids Council has apparantly found the questionnaire
satisfactory.
JESiVV
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
t ..
Dear Resident:
Subject: State Grant for Aeration and Cleanup of Crooked Lake
'l11e State of Minnesota has made available a matching grant in the
arrount of $25,000 for aeration and cleanup of Crooked Lake.
On January 16, 1986, there was a public neeting regarding this
grant. It was the opinion of the representatives present to fonnally
survey the residents in the watershed district of Crooked Lake.
In order to determine the desires of the residents concerning
implerrentation and use of the grant you are invited to respond to this
questionnaire. Your response does count!
Please indicate your degree of
agreerrent with each of the follCMing
staterrents by circling how you feel
about each staterrent.
III .~,~
VI tJ.:
Water quality in Crooked Lake
needs to be improved.
SD
An irrp::>rtant priority is a study. 'Ibe
purpose of the study is to determine
the best and safest rrethod of aeration to
prevent fish winter kill and improve water
quqli ty .
..
SA
A
N
D
SD
The grant should be used to prepare a
carprehensi ve study to satisfy the MPCA
application requirerrents for additional
Federal dollars.
SA
A
N
D
SD
15 to 20 percent of, the grant. should be
appropriated for a study with the remaining
dollars spent on a project (s) . (This study
may not necessarily meet MPCA application
requirements) .
SA
A
N
D
SD
The property owners in the Crooked Lake
watershed district should be assessed a
portion of the cost to improve the waters
quality of Crooked Lake.
SA
A
N
D
SD
Nothing should be done to improve
Crooked Lake with the appropriated
funds.
SA
A
N
D
SD
. I am a resident of:
Andover Coon Rapids
(circle one)
I live on the west/east side of Crooked Lake.
(circle one)
Additional ccmnents:
..
..
o
o