HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC January 21, 1986
o
o
o
o
,0
7:30 p.m.
7:45 p.m.
9:00 p.m.
9:15 p.m.
9:15 p.m.
9:45 p.m.
o
c
CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JANUARY 21, 1986
AGENDA
1. Call to order
2. Resident Forum (5 min./item. 15 min. totaL
Items will not be acted on,
but will be placed on the next
regular agenda if action is
required. )
3. Agenda Approval
4. Discussion Items
a. Universal Properties Sketch Plan, Cont.
b. Good Value's Sketch Plan (Hidden Creek)
c. Boisclair Corporation
1. Library Site
2. Set Meeting/Tax Increment Financing
d. Economic Development/Tax Increment Financing
e. County 116 Drainage Study
Recess
Reconvene
5. Non-Discussion Items
a. Assess Hanson Boulevard
b. Feasibility Report/86-1/Creekridge Estates
c. Feasibility Report/86-2/Smith's Green Acres
d. Utility Connection Charges/User Fees
e. Alexandra House Donation
f. Award Contract/Early Warning Sirens
6. Reports of Commissions, Committees, Staff
a. Hire Utility Billing/Accounting Clerk
b. Street Lights, Cont.
c. Round Barn Operation, Cont.
d. Zoning Issues
1. Shore land Ordinance/DNR
2. Helicopter/Heliport
3. Temporary Signs
4. Newspaper Containers
5. Pet Shops/l Hour Photo Shop
6. Corner Lots
7. Approval of Claims
8. Approval of Minutes
9. Adjournment
-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
C)
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Mayor and City Council
Cit Clerk
Januar
1986
What's Happeninq
-Larry P. Johnson has been here since 1/13/86. Actually
he was here all day on the 10th.
Larry has passed the acceptance test at the Red Ox.
He ate lutefisk with all the Scandinavians.
-January 20th - Martin Luther King, Jr. Day - City
Offices will be closed.
-January 21 regular Council meeting
-January 28th, 7:30 P.M., Ordinance 8 discussion
-February 4th Regular Council meeting
-February 6th - Joint Meeting with Park Board and
Andover Athletic Association.
-February 11th - Meeting with Boisclair and Andover's
Economic Development Commission. Boisclair will be
here with a full proposal ready for action per Jeff
Wickert. I have requested that an attorney from
Lefebvre, Lefler be here.
-We need to meet with Anoka about the drainage plan
for Dehn's/Rosella's pond - County 116 drainage plan.
JES:vv
-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM
NO. OEA
MOTION BY
TO
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE January:l1 1 qRf;
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY: Vicki Volk
I have been able to contact the OEA coordinators
at Blaine Senior High, Anoka Senior High, and
Coon Rapids Senior High.
Their students on the OEA program work anywhere
from 10 to 20 hours per week.
The employer is responsible for paying the students~
they must be paid at least $3.35 per hour, which is
minimum wage. However, most employers pay any-
where from $3.40 - $4.00 per hour.
I request that Council make a motion in regards
to what salary the City will pay for an OEA student.
Now is the best time to hire one of these people as
the second semester is just going to start.
VV
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1986
BY:
FOR
ITEM Universal Prop. Sketch
NO. Plan
4a
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
James SChr~
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Discussion
The City Council is requested to review the sketch
plan of Universal Properties/Chuck Cook.
The City Council at the January 7, 1986 Council meeting
suggested the developer consider a plan that would pro-
vide lots of about I acre as the ultimate plan (i.e.,
if or when sanitary sewer and water may be available to
the area, the lots could be subdivided or developed to
a 1 acre/lot density - providing for future streets, etc,),
The sketch plan as presented seems to have addressed
the Council's requests.
This is different than the overlay for future development
that the ordinance provides for.
Ordinances 8 and 10 require public hearings by the Planning
Commission to change, The attached sketch plan will need
some modification to the existing ordinance, unless this
is processed as a P.U.D, using cluster development.
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1986
4b
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
r-
BY: James Schrantz
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Ddlscussion
ITEM Good Value Sketch Plan
NO.
The City Council is requested to review the sketch plan for
Good Value's Hidden Creek.
The main considerations are:
1, Major street alignment with Anoka County and the City of
Coon Rapids.
We have met with Anoka County, Coon Rapids" Good Value, and
the realignment of County Road 18 along the east line of
Section 33 and continuing south and west through Coon Rapids
to TH 242 have been tentatively agreed on.
2, Soil/Protected wetlands
'Ihe proposed Crosstown relocation north of Bunker Lake Boulevard
goes through the protected wetland 6l5W (Red Oaks Pond).
3. Fire Station location is being reviewed.
4. Rezoning is proposed for D.l.e nor the as t corner of the sketch
plan, A rezoning public ~earing should be held along with
the preliminary plat public hearing. (or PUD Special Use Permit)
The other detailed items, such as grading, drainage, wetlands,
etc. are being handled by DeWayne Olson, Good Value's consultant,
and the final design for the utilities and streets will be
designed by TKDA, the city's consultants.
JES : vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
CITY OF ANDOVER
DATE Januarv 21, 1986
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
ITEM Boisclair Corporation
NO. 4c 1 & 2
BY: James Schrantz
FOR
The City Council is requested to consider, Boisclair's request
that the Downtown Center be considered as an alternate site
for the Anoka County Library.
They would also like to discuss tax increment financing for
their project at a special meeting to be held February 11,
1986. (This is P&Z meeting night so the meeting will be held
in the Senior Citizen center or meeting room, depending on
room needed for presentation.)
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Januarv 21, 1986
ITEM
NO.
County 116 Drainage
4e Study
BY: James Schrantz
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to review the drainage
plan called "the county 116 drainage study".
City staff will he prepared to answer questions.
A joint meeting with the City of Anoka, Anoka and Andover's
County Commissioners and the, Anoka County staff to discuss
the plan and its impact on the cities is being scheduled.
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
\
.
-0
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Januarv 21. 198fi
OR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
ITEM
NO.
Economic Development
.4d
BY:
James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to review the Economic Development
Committee's work on CDBG funding and tax increment financing.
Ted Lachinski, chairman, will give the committee report.
Attached are minutes and CDBG estimated funds available.
Note the estimated funds for 1986 have been readjusted to
$9 0 , 8 61.
JES:vv
Attachments: 11/1~/~5 minutes
Tax increment project map
CDBG memo from Anoka County
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
t
o
o
o
.... ~'
.
j.-/,tb
CITY of ANDOVER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
NOVEMBER 12, 1985
MINUTES
A Meeting of the Community Development Committee was called to order by Chairman
Ted Lachinski on November 12, 1985, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Members present: Councilman Mike Knight, Al Chapman, Ed Fiori, Jim Perra,
and Aderian Smith
Also present: Councilman Jim Elling
Councilman Lachinski reported they had a follow-up meeting with Mrs. Heidelberger
regarding the possible sale of her land to the City. She had wanted to keep a
parcel for her son to operate a business on. He explained the City would have
to get an apprai sa 1 of the property as to the market va 1 ue and coul d on ly pay up
to that amount. Councilman Lachinski said he asked Mrs. Heidelberger t~ consider
selling all of her property to the City and use that money-~lus ,that from the sale
of scrap cars to, help her ,son set up a business elsewhere. He
said that is where the discussions were left to date.
Councilman Lachinski, stated they also met with representatives of Good Value Homes
who owns the property to the south of the Heidelberger property. They have expressed
an interest in developing an industrial park on Mrs. Heidelberger's property.
Councilman Elling stated they also talked about the possibility of having Good Value
Homes purchase Mrs. Heidelberger's property and develop it using tax increment
financing. Good Value is putting together a package regarding that idea. He stated
he has also received in inquiry from a developer in Osseo regarding a TIF district
in Andover. Councilman Lachinski also stated the Council has authorized $500 to
have an attorney do the paperwork for setting up a tax increment financing district
and the project area.
Mr. Smith reported thecppotographs have been taken of various City amenities for a
promotional brochure, but he has not yet drafted that brochure. He stated he will
have that ready for the next meeting.
The Committee then discussed the boundaries of a tax increment financing district.
It was agreed the district should include the blighted area along Bunker Lake
Boulevard, agreeing to include the following: All the Light Industry, General
Business, General Industry along Bunker Lake Boulevard.
MOTION by A. Smith, Seconded by E. Fiori, that our TIF District be all that
industrial proper,ty along Bun,ker Lake B,oulevard, including the Li9ht,Indu~st r al~ng
the railroad tracks: south side of Bunker Lake Boulevard starting at the e ge of
the R-4 District. eastward to include all the G-I zone; and on the no~ ' side
of Bunker Lake Boulevard going eastward include all the LB, GB, and LI zo ed property.
Motion carried unanimously.
There was some concern as to what wi 11 bappen with the LI property in the northeastern
corner of Hanson and Bunker Lake Boulevards. as the City had received a petition
for utilities and an informal request for residential zoning of some property.
The Committee generally agreed they were not in favor of underwriting housing
developments with tax increment financing; and should that property be rezoned to
residential. it would be the intent to take that property out of the TIF district.
t
. "
..
o
Community Development Committee Meeting
November 12, 1985 - Minutes
pagd 2
Discussion returned to the specific property of Marian Heidelberger, recognlzlng a
formal appraisal of the property must be made before the City can make an offer for
the property. At thi s poi nt the Committee agreed to proceed wi th mak i ng an offer
for the property based on the market value as determined by arr appraisal.
MOTION by E. Fiori ,Seconded by A. Smith, to make an offer to Marian Heidelberger
based on the City authorizing an appraisal of the property. DISCUSSION: Councilman
Lachinski thought the City was getting about S120,000 in 1986 in CDBG funds and
wiT 1 receive a simiTiar amount the following year as well. It was felt the first
step is requesting that an appraisal be done. It was also acknowledged that the City
should have a contract with a developer prior to the final acquisition of the
property.
Mr. Fiori CHANGED THE MOTION to: that the Heidelberger property be appraised as
the first step toward a tax increment financing district in compliance with CDBG
regulations. Second Stands. Motion carried unanimously.
The Committee then discussed the establishment of a project area withiri the TIF
Di strict.
o
MOTION by A. Smith, Seconded by J. Perry, that the tax increment financing district
be bounded by Jay Street on the east, at approximately 135th on the south,
westward to the western boundary of the GI District, arid north to Bunker Lake
Boulevard. Motion carried unanimously.
The Committee discussed their intention of strongly solicing projects withirr that
project area, thaLi nforma 1 commitments from Good Val ue Homes and acceptance from
Mrs. Heidelberger are needed for a qualified project, and that a campaigrr is desirable
to talk with other property owners in the area to explain alternatives. It was felt
the attorney would list the steps needed to be done to implement the TIF projects.
It was agreed not to set a specific date for the next meeting, that Councilman
Lachinski will call a meeting when it is necessary. The Committee asked the
secretary to obtain the following information: Exactly how much in CDBG funds will
the City be receiving in 1986? Exactly how much in CD8G funds will the City be
receiving in 1987? Can the funds be used for advertising to solicit developers in
the TIF district? Can the funds be used for appraisal fees? Can the CDBG funds be
used to set up and get a tax increment f i nanci ng d i stri ct in the City?
MOTION by M. Knight, Seconded by A. Smith, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 8~57 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
'\\ 'C0~^~C~CC,-;'/ >
· M~' A. eeac~ . \ f c0L
Recordlng Secretary
o
-
I
'ill
'sJ ~\
J 1\
r'
1-f
r-
,..\
~CJ-
o
o
I
~-
~.
,.. " _~<{b
---' "
7
7
~~ .bA../ r
.>. ~~ _~r
I ~ I t
I "
I I
r -
"
=i,
'<ilL
J 1-=1f~v_."
L.: '" ~I-O : ~H-' ",
...J.1 \ ~~ :,~J:C- ---i.
I :1 "" ,'''-1-1 :t.r.r I
-- \"- /'y' -
1 _I.L 'fj){/>-,-
L 1 -- - >SJ ~
.;::$ ~:t. w
~ fl:~.,',
- . .: k6I ".' /
. . "Y-:;: .
<1""\. ',/
'.:1..",. " .:: ..,,,.:.
-l<1:r. " -;r; ..' -- - ,
::i!.1!')I! .,s .1j ~!:j~
. a . ~
: .... 5?J: ~:
r :~~j.~0~>;":=------'
"'" Jl' '1r.l.r-8/M f I
__ ~ . ~ ~. ./_. :r.J::r.7\~(ij !
: __L ____
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
0" .. q'
~~".-
HJ
'7
- _L_
I -
I
o
"'1-
I
--'-....--/ - ----i--
I I
; I
j______ , I r
I lfJ;t-j~',1< ~:=r
I ! - 1-~ ( . ~. ,Oti c
I . 1 r, .:: ,I')' .~
. /1 ' C
I .. - - - - ----t '," ~V;. I,t:r -<>
_ _--.t ___ _ _ }? ~~. r .
i .. - -~ "- j mme> ..L :;:c;- L.
I -7----~-----_--_--jl~ ! j;: . .?i --::
If; - -- 111'f'l'T;T.;Z0: ~
;' __ I l-ti.;:N. . '" I-;
I _ __ _n~ r - -=--=---.:....:..:..= I i :>1-!'i ~
! Ii f"""~ ,,<
Ir 1!--:1
1 I: I
-----f~_n _n I I
! 1 -- --,- -j - - ~ - ' 1
, i ~ I U-, I =
'I I I I
_ ,__ ____ I ~ ' -e_....;:=-- I I
-r .m___~_ .U ". - ,
I ,-- ---, .--. - Lm. --;-.-- -L I
~_ V ! t :Tcc'~-; J'Lr:t;
_/ c --7~" I - , ' . I' , " 'c
~ l)t~f'~\N'~~- - ! j I .l'r~, ~r~'-~~
...., I ,/ .u.~J\\ . ~" " 'l.
tlrrlJ. I ,( ~~, ,;L l, I Ii' i'~ \:' ~.~-
~ _ _ .,~ I / / rr0:::ti L I' I I, I. ""~rt-. ....t"j..
. __ __ (I )) ~ ~~ ~ 1 I' . ". ~
::r I L: I I --r- - -- --- 1 - ,I,,.; ____ _J_ ~ . I ~ J
G i..J'!~ :. iUS i r -- .---7:w-c~
__ , _.-:=...;;., ',/ r,_ ;:.+-: _ Ii ! j F i ,T. J ;
~:o -I - -c- u · I Li ~-c i~ I I
J )5 I I " -, ''r. L_.
~ : : I )...-.--1 ---:-s';';l4/""",
ii' .. ' '
,.. __,_.L : C ~ I' ~~".: ,'I '-f'
, ",_".).. p r-n C
.. __ _ ,,~ I ... .......,1" .~,
<-- --C I-~',.. /I ,I " .,..,
'. ,'''1", L
-< I I--.J
? ~ ---, :T:rii'
~ r;-----c-:-
: ~ 'L ! I -
~ ~
" I
"""'I
u_J
I
I
," i'-
! I I '
I " ',~)i I i
. I. ;. ..::i Hl_ I. :..
1h.1 ". C' .~
bi ~,' I~ I;
-V I .u. i~
I ~I!' 'i': h
:-V)/ I~' IV)' ~'
. i' I~,;H' [. ,
.h.. .0.---1" ! ;'. t, ~
,__j....iu_1 ".J_j____~
~
I
I
- -----+----
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
~I
'.<"'..1",
,-""...".'" !
I
J
I
o
~
. 0
,
I
o
o
~t
o
t!'), l ( WJ
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Economic Deve lopment Committee
Marcie Peach
Clerk
Ik" ()f rnR(; Fllnrl<;
The Economic Development Committee had asked me to check on some specifics
regarding the use of CDBG funding.
The CDBG funds available to the City on July 1, 1986, will be approximately
$113,217. The County stated there should be some funding again in 1987;
however, because Congress has not yet acted on that bill, they have no idea
how much that will be.
The CDBG funds can be used to advertise and solicit developers in a tax
increment financing district and can also be used for appraisal fees and
administrative costs to set up a TIF district. However, the amount of these
planning and administrative costs cannot exceed 20 percent of the CDBG funding.
Please note that the Council has also authorized $&,000 from the 1986 CDBG
funds to be used by the Anoka County Library Board for the disadvantaged,
disabled and senior citizens in the event the Board approves the location of
a library within the City of Andover.
r
II'
,~
--
.
CO U N TV
OF
ANOKA
Office of the County Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760
January 10, 1986
~ ce.
Iz/~~
Mr. Jim Schrantz, EngIneer
City of Andover
Community Center
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N. W.
Andover, Minnesota 55303
Re: Proposed 30% Reduction in the 1986
Community Development Block Gront Program
Dear Jim:
o
The Area HUD office has unofficially informed us that in response to the
"Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985", our 1986 CDBG
program is likely to be cut to 0 budget equal to 70% of our 1985 allocotion.
While this reduction is not certain, it is likely. Therefore, I am forwarding to
you the 1986 Anoka County CDBG budget based on these cuts.
We will keep you informed of the stotus of our CDBG Program as informotion is
available to us. Unless you hear otherwise, please use these figures to plan your
1986 project(s).
If you have any questions, you can contact me at 421-4760, extension 1178.
Sincerely yours,
oAnn O. Wright
Community Development Coordinator
JOW:sw
Enclosure
o
,<~.:
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
..
o
o
o
..
f 986 CDBG BUDGET
BASED ON CUT OF 30% FROM 1985 FIGURES
CITY
ANOKA
HILL TO~'
COL. HTS.
BLC,) NE
COON RA.'I DS '
FRIDLEY
CENTE RV I LLE
CIRCLE ~'I NES
LEXINGTON
LIND LAKES
S~'RING LK. PK
CARRYOVER FROM 85
ANDOVER
BETHEL
BURNS
oAV GROVE
RAMSY
ST.FRANCJ5
CARRYOVER FROM 85
COLUM~JS TOwNSHlr'
[ r....~ 1 8f 1 d[ l
Hf..jM :... Hh[
L I '.wOoD
COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVEL.
COU~lY t10USING REhA~
COUNTY ADMIN.
TOTAL 8~ PLANNED BUDGET
198~
DR I G I NAL ~'LAN
157387
9254
1~3Ic:2
3297E.3
CHECK
128851
151447
127840
408138
CHECK
13E..42
48871
3802E.
o
011
100539
CHECK
-5851
129063
011
011
o
III
o
} ,,:908:;
CHECv,
-1f.7f.
t.t.. :~ ,~' r:f
~'::'''1;
ol,
E..l2\~e
11~00~
CHECK
75"1/10
2131/1_'.'0
10300;:1
145~l(\00
PROJECTED
198&
TOTAL
110171
6478
114185
230834
91319&
10E.013
89488
285E.'37
9788
350E..3
27282
a
o
72133
9f118E.1
13
o
o
e
..,
908(.1
4 t..:.. 70
,:)\~39.:
01,
4':'''1
81203
52500
14011130110
72100
101125327
o
CO UN TY
OF
f;~s- · U1/J
ANOKA- ~
"
Office of the County Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINN ESOT A 55303 612-421 -4760
October 25, 1985
~ \:)
,- -/."
. ,)
1,;- C.~.
, '\1'<.
, iU'.
MEMO TO:
All TAC Members
FROM:
SUBJECT:
JoAnn O. Wright, Community Development Coordinator
1986 CDBG Planning
o
Just when 85 CDBG appears to be rolling along, it's time to begin
planning the 1986 applications. Attached are the schedule and
materials for your 1986 CDBG Project(s} Application. The rules
for 1986 are the same as those applied to the 1985 Program. The
only difference is the available funding. To date it appears
that Congress will cut the 1986 Program by 12~%. The budget
attached represents 87~% of 1985 funds, although we will not have
final figures for up to several months.
As in 1985, the 25% of Anoka County Census Block Groups having
the lowest median incomes, are, considered by HUD to be lower income
neighborhoods. Any CDBG-eligible activity which serves those
areas may be funded by the 1986 Community Development Block Grant.
I have attached a list for your use. If you do not have sufficient
data in your offi ce to determi ne the bounda ri es of these
"low-income" areas in your City, please call me.
Keep in mind that we will have a late November TAC meeting to
which you might bring your questions and/or suggestions. Good
luck in your preparations and please feel free to call for
assistance.
()../J .. ',tJ.~, ~./+
~"~ght v"1/'~~
Community Development
Coordinator
JW:dz
Enclosure
o
..~$o~-i
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
.
0
1986 PROJECT
CITY ORIGINAL PLAN 1986
ANOKA 157387 137714
HILLTOP 9254 8097
COL. HTS. 163122 142732
329763 288543
288543
0
0
BLAINE 128851 112745
COON RAPIDS 151447 132516
FRIDLEY 127840 111860
0
408138 357121
357121
0
CENTERVILLE 13642 12036
CIRCLE PINES 48871 43118
LEXINGTON 38026 33549
LINO LAKES 0 0
SPRING LK. PK. 0 0
0 0
100539 88703
87972
0
ANDOVER 129083 113217
BETHEL 0 0
BURNS 0 0
OAK GROVE 0 0
RAMSEY 0 0
ST. FRANCIS 0 0
0
129083
, 113217
112948
0
COLUMBUS TWP. 66529 58213
EAST BETHEL 43417 37990
HAM LAKE 0 0
LI NWOOD 6058 5301
116004 101504
CO. ECON. DEVEL. 75000 65625
CO. HOUSING REHAB. 200000 175000
CO. ADMIN. 103000 90066
TOTAL 86 PLANNED 1454000 1279777
BUDGET
0
o
'" Ol
0 v >.. e ~
E - '"
0 - '- V
.... e 0 >
.... Ie- :) a. 0'-
0 '-' 0 a. -
U :) Ol 0
<Ii - e V clI
"'C 0 '"
V - 0 V o~ :.0:.0 e
- 0 - '0' :) 0
0 V - - .c
~ V '0' '" '- 0 0 '" '"
V V a."'C e ,
'- :) 0 .!:l -
< -... a. v- c
- cr- e 0 - 0 :;) V
a:: - 3 V .- 0 '" Ol a. E
0 (,) 0 V '- -0 V
- v_ :)cL "'C :;)
'" e - '- e
~ - c Ol 2"< 0 g
U 0 :) 0 0 e '-I clI
g '- -.- Ol "'C
0 0 Ol '- - e e
.!:l~ '" V e.n
a5 '" e '- 0
o . vi - 3 .c C"- 0 - e
Ol vi V)~ Ol - '- '" V '-
e - E 0 0 OlV 3 -
>-~UJ 0 al a V e - Ol - :) I
.!:l '"
.(i; >:. '- -... '-' 0 2" - 3 ..:
~~.~' E.~ 0 :) '" '" c 0 e '"
0 o. '" - V '" V - L. V V
L. :):= .c '" - .!:l 0 :)
52s~ '" a. "'C - V - L. >
e 0,- e 8.al :) Ol cr-
",.!:l 0 0 :;) V
0 3 0 0... ... V
u~u "'C0l '" g----: 0-"""""' 0 '-
en. v. .!:l <II - _0 "'C "'C
<II e >..- :) a. <II L. 0 V L. L. C L. -
:;) ..cu a. 0 - > a. . 0 - 0 e
~~~ 0 Ol C <II e V V - 0 0 0
'" e v V <II 0 C V v '-
:) > 0 > 0.- _~ "'C30l ro +- cc Ol
~>- ~ "'C e 0 g v +- 0 v ~
L. U 0 >.. 0 ._ >..0"'C >.. >.. -
Ci v <II "'C - (J ~ __:J - a. '" +-
<r-~ -... v e.- v e -... .!:l e e E
0 >.. >.. :J-- 5~"'C :) E
- e .,. L. >.. - o a. 0 .!:l :;) ..c
Z 0 0 e 0 0 :) 0 :;)
c 0 U - < u u g. E U'(j 5 u U 0... U Vl
:::>
~
~
0 Ln '-i' ;;0
U M """ .....
~
~ '" >- >- >-
u .." _co ~ 0. D..
Jj 'J <:J ,- ..::.z.
Cl lL..
M ~ <i" ~ -~
L{) -:::; f"'1 "";,,-
> u = ..0 >- <- <- <- >, >,
0 <l) '" <lJ ~ D.. 0. U. .'B .f~_
0 Cl '-::J '-'-. ,~ :( ::::;:
'-
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
o
I.
PROJECT NAME:
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY
A. Briefly describe the project
I. Project location (attach a map)
2. Project activities (acquisition, relocation, construction,
demolition, rehabilitation, administration, etc.)
3. Detail the number of persons benefitting.
4. How are they benefitting"
5. How many persons are low income?
III. PROJECT DURATION:
A. Is this a one, two or three year project?
B, Give Project termination date.
IV. If the Project is more than one year, detail the project activities by year.
\l. Briefly describe the Community problems that the activities oddress.
(For example, neighborhood blight, lack of low income jobs, substandard
housing.)
o
VI.
Summarize the funding.
A. Total revenue needed.
B. Total C.D.B.G. revenue needed.
C. Source and amount of other revenue.
'111. Detail the cost of eoch activity (demonstrate how each cost was arrived
at).
VIII. Briefly describe the project area.
A. Its geographical size.
B. Number of households, or businesses.
C. Adequacy of the public facilities (sewers, water, streets, etc.).
D. Age of the neighborhood, of the homes or businesses.
Is this project part of 0 larger effort? If yes, explain!
Project contoct person:
RESOLUTION OF LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: ATTACH TO FORM
Individual authorized to request reimbursements for project expenses
from Anoka County.,
43StiO
t'et1erlU ..."lP....r I \(01. 4(;, No. llltl t frlllay. ::ieplemoer <:a. llllla I Kwes and KegulalJons
. ,
.,"
.ubject to the provi.ion of SllIlIliart G. con.truction .ctivitie. curled. out in
for. ./ connection with. river .nd .dj.ceut
(1) Activltiel elis! or ....i.tance I.nd. .nd nood .nd dreineser.cilltie.
under tbia Subp ate eligible only where ....i.t.nce h..
(2) Notwith dlns the provl.iolUl of I been detennined to be unavail.ble
157tU07. other .ctivitie. aa.the under other Federall.w. 01' progrema.
Seere y determine to be . No CDBG funda may be oblig.ted or
con ent with the Plll'pOWs of the t expended for .ctivitiea .pacified in thl.
~. 811 Developm,ent Acllon Cr.nt .ubperagraph until the recipient h..
l"'f""D' "" . ~ ,_ ~ v complied. with the following
. ._~.Iil...'" .C".......;'....~ "',:.. ~'.. requirement.:
f I7tI.201 --...... - (I) An .pplic.tion or written requelt
Crent ...I.tance may be used for tlle haa been made to the Federal esency
following .ctivitie.: that customarily funds the proposed
(.) Acquisition. Acquisition in whole activity within the recipient'.
or in perl by . public .gency or private jurisdiction: .nd
nonprofit entity. by purchase, lea~e. . (ii) The applicallon or request h...
don.tion. or otherwl... of re.1 property been rejected. or the recipient h.a been
(including air risht.. water rightAl. rights- advised that funda will not be m.de
. of-w.y. e.sements. .nd other interests available for .t le...t 90 d.ys .fter the
therein) for eny public purpose. subject date of the .pplication or requot. or
to the IimltatlOIUl of 1 570.207( .). there hes been no respon.. from the
(b) Di'p08ition. Disposlllon. through Federal .gency .fter 45 d.y. from the
.ale. Ie.... don.tlon. or otherwiee, of d.te of the .ppllcation or reqUeft.
.ny real property .cqulred with CDBG (2) The following f.cIlitle. are eliFble
funda Mila retention for public only when located in or aervlng area
purpoMa. Including re.aanable co.1a of where other community development
temporarily menaglng auch property or .ctlvilie. h.ve been or are being curled
property .cqulred under urb.n renew.l. out:
provided thet the proceeda from eny (I) ParIdng f.cIlities;
such di.pcmtlon .b.lI be program (ii) Fire protection f.cilitle. 8IId
Incom. .ublect to the requirementAI eet equipment 8IId
forth In 1570.508. (liiJ Solid w..te di.po.... recycliq or
(c) Public fociliti.. and converaion f.cIlill...
improvements. Acqui.ltion. (dl Clearance activit/a. C1earece.,
COlUltructlon. recolUltructiOn. demolition. 8IId removal of b~
rehabilitation or lnatallation of public end improvementa, Including mlJVelllent
r.cIlitle. 8IId Improvementa, except a. of .tructurH to other .it... Demolition of
provided In 1 570.201(a). curled out by HUD ...iated hOUling unitAl may be
the recipient or other public or priv.te undertaken only with the prior approval
nonprofit entitie.. In undertaking .uch of HUD.
activities. de.1gn fe.ture. and (e) Public services. (Effective date:
improvemenla which promote energy nu. paragraph I. effective .. of the
efficiency may be Included. Sucb beginning of the recipient's program
.ctivitie. m.y allO Include the execution funded from Federal Fiacal Year 1982
of architectural dolgn features"and and subaaquent.ppropriatiolUl.)
similar traatmentAllntended to enhlUlC8 Provision of public aervice. (including
the .othetic quality of facllille. and labor. .upplie.. and materials) which are
improvementAI receiving CDBG directed toward improving the
alli.lance. .uch a decorative community'. public aervice. and
p.vementa. raillnga. acu1p~ pool. of feci1ltlea. including but not limited to
water and lountelna. and other wow of thON concerned with employment.
.rt. Nonprofit entitie. 8IId .ubreclplenta crime prevention. child care. health.
.. .pacified In 1 57O.2OC may .cquire drug abule. education. energy
title to public faci1ltio .uch a aenior conaerv.tion. welfare. or recreational
cente.... eantera for the handicapped. or need.. Ia order to be eligihle for CDBG
neishborhood faci1lti... When .uch a..ist8llca. public ..mea. must meet
facllitin are owned by DODprOfit entitin each of the following criteria:
or .ubreclplenta, ~ ahall be operated (1) ^ public ..rvice mUlt be either: (I)
10 .. to be open for UN by the general A new ..rviea. or (ilJ a quantlfl.ble
public durIn8 all normal hours of Inere... in the level of . ..rviea ,hove
opention. Publlc faci1ltle8 and th.t which hu been provided by or In
improvementa elitlble for a..ialance behalf of the unit of genera1loca1
under tbia parqrapb are aubject to the govemment (through funda ralaed by
policl.. In 1 57O.2lll1(b) and the .uch unit. 01' received by .uch unit from
re.lrictlolUlapeclfied below, . tha State In whlcb It ia located) In ,the
(1) Parb. pl.YlIfOUIICla, and twelve ca1eodar montha prior to the
recreational facllitiee ..tabllahed a . 'VMo;Woa of the .tatemenL (An
_ult of reclamatioll and other .xceptioa to thla requirement ID87' be
o
o
o
m.de if HUD determine. that the
decre... in the level of . service was
the re.ult of eventAI not within the
control of the unit of general local
govemmenLj
(2) The amount of funds u.ed for
public .ervice.. including servke.
provided by .ubrecipients under
I 570.204. .hell not exceed 10 percent of
each grant except .. provided in
.ubparagr.h (3) below. For Entitlement
grantAI under Subp.rt D. compliance is
based on the amount of fund. obligated
for public aervice activities in each
program ye.r compared to the
Entitlement grant made for that program
year.
(3) A recipient which allocated more
than 10 percent of It. grant for public
services In itS program funded from
Federal FI.cel Year 1981 appropriation..
may obligate more than 10 percent of ils
grant for public ~ca in each of ils
program yeare funded from Federal
Fiacal Yeare 1982. 1llll3. or 1984
.ppropriation. 10 long a. the .mount
obligated In any .uch program year does
not exceed the .mount allocated in
FlacaI Year 1981. For the purpo.e. of
thi. provi.ion. the Flecal Year 1981
allocation I. the amount .pecified for
public .emce actlvitie. In the Coat
Summary applicable fo the program
funded (rom Flacal Year 1981
.ppropriationa. a of October 1. 1981.
(f) Intl1rim auistDncI1. ~
(1) The foUowing activitie. may be
undertaken on an interim basi. in are..
exhibiting objectlvely detenninable
.ign. of phy.icel deterioration where the
recipient ha. determined that immediate
aclion i. neceaaary to afre.t the
deterioration and that pennanent
improvement. will be carried out as
lOon as practicabla:
(i) The repalrln8 of street.. sidewalk..
parka. playgrounds. publicly owned
utilllle.. and public building: and
(ii) The execution of special garbage.
trash. and debri. removal. including
neighborhood cleanup campaigns. but
not the regular curb.ide collection of
garb.ge or truh in an' area.
(2) In order to .Ueviate emergency
condiliona threatening the public health
and aatety In area wh"re the chief
executive officer of the recipient
determine. that '\lch an emergency
condition exiala and require. immediate
relOlution. cnllC funcla may be used for:
(I) The actlvltio .pacified In
.ubparqraph (1) .bove. except for the
repair of parka and playgrounda;
(ii) For the dearance of .treeta,
Including IIlOW removal end similar
activities; and
(Iii) The improvement of private
properties.
'.
o
o
c
43682
Federal RegIater I VoL 48. No. 186 I Friday. September 23. 1983 I Rules and Regulations
(b) The provision of assistance to
private for profit buaine..e.. incJudins,
but notlimlted to.grants.loana. loan
guarantee.. interest supplement..
technical assistance. and other forms of
support. for any other activity neceseary
or appropriate to carry out an economic
development project. excludins tho..
described as ineligible in I 570.207(e).
f 570.204 llpeclal acttvtaH by
.ut...c1p_nta.
(a) Eligible activities. The recipient
may grant CDBG funds to any of the
three types of subrecipiants specified in
paragraph (c) below, to carry out.
neighborhood revitalization. commullity
economic development. or energy
conservation project. Such e project may
include:
(1) Activities listed as eligible under
this Subpart; and
(2) Activities not otherwise listed 81
eligible undet this Subpart, except thoee
described as ineligible in I 570.207(a).
wlum the recipient determines that such
activities are necessary or appropriate
to achieve its community development
objectbres.
(b) Recipient responsibilities.
Recipients under Subparts D. F. or G are
responsible for ensuring tha t CDBG
funds are utilized by subrecipients in a
'manner conslatent with the
requirements of this Part and other
applicable Federal State. or local law.
Gtltntees are also responsible for
carrying out the environmental review
and clearance responsibilities.
(c) Eligible subrecipients. The
following are subrecipients authorized
to receive grantS' under this section.
(1) Neighborhood-based nonprofit
o.'1Ianizations. A neighborhood-based
nonprofit organiza tion is an associa tion
or corporation. duly organized to
promote and undertake community
development activities on a not-for-
profit basla within a neighborhood. An
organization Is considered to be
neighborhood-based if the majority of
either Its membership. clientele. or
governing body are residents of the
neighborhood where activities assisted
with CDBG funds are to be carried out.
A neighborhood Is defined as:
(I) A geographic location within the
jurisdiction of a unit of general local
government (but not the entire
jurisdiction) designated in
comprehensive plam. ordinances. or
other local documents as a
neighborhood;
(il) l:he entire-jurisdlclion of a unit of
generallocalgovemment which is under
25.800 IlOpulation: or
(Iii) A neighborhood. village. or
similar geographical designation. in a
new community as defmed in
I 570.403(a).
(2) Section 301(dj Small Business
Investment Companies. A section 301(d)
Small BUliness Inyestment Company is
an entity organized pursuant to section
301(d) ofthe Small Business Investment
Act of 1958 (15 U.S.c. 681(d)). Including
those which are profit making.
(3) Local Development Corporations.
A local development corporation is:
(i) An entity organized pursuant to
Title vn of the Headstart. Economic
Opportunity. and Community
Partnership Act of 1974 (42 V.S.C. 2981)
or the Community Economic
Development Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 9801
et seq.):
(il) An entity eligible for assistance
under section 502 or 503 of the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958 (15
U .S.c. ll96);
(ill) Other entities incorporated under
State or local law whose membership is
representative of the area of operation
of the entity (including nonresident
owners of businesses in the area) and
which is similar In purpose. function.
and scope to those specified In (I) or (ii)
above; or
(iv) A Stale development entity
eligible for assistance under Section 501
of the Small Business Investment Act of
1958 (15 ~.S.C. 695).
f 570.205 ~ planning _ poIIcy-
pIal.IlI.............lI.ment tsp Iclty building
-....
(a) PlllJUling activities which consist
of all costa of data gathering. studie..
analysis. and preparation of plans and
implementing actions. including. but not
limited to:
(1) Comprehensive plans:
(2) Community development plans;
(3) Functional plans. in areas such as:
(i) Housing. including the development
of a Housing Assistance Plan;
(ii) Land use;
(iii) Economic development:
(iv) Open space and recreation:
(v) Energy use and conservation:
(vi) Floodplain management in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Orders 11988 and 11990:
(vii) Transportation:
(viii) Utilities; and
(ix) Historic preservation.
(4) Other plans and studiel such as;
(i) Small area and neighborhood
plans:
(ii) Capital improvements programs:
(ill) individual project plans (but
excluding engineering and design cost
related to a specific activity which are
eligible 81 pert of the cost of such
activity under II 570.201-670.2(1);
(iv) The reasonable coets of general
environmental and historic preservation
studies. However. costs necessary to
comply with 24 CFR Part 58. including
project specific environmental
assessments and cleerances for
activities eligible for assistance under
lhis Part are eligible as part of the cost
of such activities under II 570.201-
570;Z04 and are therefore not planning
costs for the purposes of I 570.2OO{ll).
(v) Strategies and action programs to
implement plans. including development
of codes. ordinances and regulations
necessary to implement such plans; and
(vi) Support of clearinghouse
functions.
(b) Palicy-planning-management-
capacity building activities which will
enable the recipient to:
(1) Detennine its needs;
(2) Set long-term goals and short-term
objectives. including those related to
environmental design:
(3) Devise programs and ectivlties to
meet these goals and objectives;,
(4) Evaluate the progress of such
programs and activities in
accomplishing these goals and
objectives: and
(5) Carry out management.
coordination and monitoring of
activities necessary for effective
planning implementation.
f 570.201 EJIgIbIe adml,,_"all.. _
Payment of reasonable administrative
costs and carrying charges related to the
planning and execution of community
development activities financed in
whole or in part with funds provided
under this Part and housing activities
covered in the recipient's Housing
Assi.tance Plan (HAP). .
(a) General management ovel'8ight
and coordination. Reasonable cosls of
overall program management.
coordination. monitoring. and
evaluation. arid similar costs associated
with management. but excluding activity
delivery costs which are eligible as part
of the cost of carrying out the activity
under I 570.201 through I 570;Z04. Such
costs include. but are notlimlled to.
necessary expenditures for the
following:
(1) Salaries. wages. and related costs,
of the recipient's staff. the staff of local
public agencies. or other staff engaged
in general management. coordination.
monitoring. and evaluation:
(2) Travel costs incurred for official
business in carrying out the program:
(3) Administrative services perfonned
under third party contracts or
agreements. including such services as
general legal services. accounting.
services. and audit services; and
(4) Other costs for good. and services
required for administfetlon of the
'.
Fedllral Register I Vol. 48. No. 186 I Friday. September 23. 1983 I Rules and Regulations
43563
o
program. including such goods and
services as rental and maintenance of
office space. insurance. utilities. office
supplies. and rental or purchase of office
equipment.
(b) The provision of information aIld
othll'resources to residents and citizen
orgsnizations participating in the
planning. implementation. or assessment
of activities being carried out with
CDBG funds.
(c) Provision of fair housing
counseling services and other activities
designed to further the fair housing
objectives of Title VIII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1968 and the housing
objective of promoting greater choice of
housing opportunities and avoiding
undue concentrations of assisted
persons in areas containing a high
proportion of lower income persons,
(d) Provision of assistance ta
facilitate performance and payment
bonding necessary for contractors
caM'Ying out activities assisted with
CDBGfunds including payment of bond
premiums on behalf of contractors.
(e) Indirect costs. Costs may be
charged to the CDBG program under a
cost allocation plan prepared in
accordance with OMB Circulars A-a7.
or A-1Z2 as applicable.
(f) Submissions or applications for
Federal programs, Preparation of
documents required for submission to
HUD or States to receive funds under
the CDBG and UDAG programs. In
addition. CDBG funds may be used to
prepare applications for other Federal
programs where the recipient
determines that such activities are
necessary or appropriate to achieve its
community development oLjectives.
(g) Administrative expenses to
facilitate hou!ling. The construction of
new housing or direct financing of new
or existing housing is not an eligible us~
of CDBG funds. except as ~esr.ribed in
t 570.207(b)(3). However. CDBG funds
may be used for necessary
administrative expenses in planning or
obtaining financing for housing units as
follows: for Entitlement grantees.
assistance authorized by this paragraph
i. limited to units which are identified in
the grantee's HUD approved Huusing.
Assistance Plan; for Small cities
grantees. assistance author;zed by this
paragraph is limited to facilitating L~e
purchase or occupancy of existing units
which are to be occupied by lower
income households. or the constMlction
of rental or owner units where at least
20 percent of the units in each project
will be occupied at affordablerentsl
costs. by lower income persons.
Examples of eligible actions are as
follows:
o
o
(1 J The cost of conducting preliminary
surveys and analysis of market needs:
(2) Site and utility plans. narrative
descriptions of the proposed
construction. preliminary cost estimates.
urban design documentation. and
"sketch drawings," but excluding
architectural. engineering. and other
details ordinarily required for
construction purposes. such as
structural. electrical. plumbing. and
mechanical details:
(3) Reasonable costs associated with
development of applications for
mortgage and insured loan
commitments. inqluding commitment
fees. and of applications and proposals
under the Section 8 Housing Assistance
Payments Program pursuant to 24 CFR
Part 1lllO-U3;
(4 ) Fees associated wi th processing of
applicalions for mortgage or insured
loan commitments under progra~s
including those administered by HUD.
Farmers Home Administration (FlI'JIA).
Federal National Mortgage Association
(FNMA), and the Government National
Mortgage Association (GNMA);
(5) The cost of issuance and
administration of mortgage revenue
bonds used to finance the acquisition.
rehabilitation. or construction of
housing. but excluding costs associated
with the payment or guarantee of the
principal or interest on such bonds; and
(6) Special outreach activities which
result in grealer landlord participation in
Section 8 existing. or similar program for
lower income persons.
! 570.207 lnellgl.... llCtlvltl...
The general rule is that any activity
that is not authorized under the
provisions of H 570.201-206 of this
Subpart is ineligible to be carried out
with COBG funds. This section identifies
two specific activities that are ineligible
and provid~s guidance thought to be
necessary in determining the eligibility
of several other activities frequently
associated with housing and community
dev'llopment.
(a) The following activities may not be
carried out using CDBG funds;
(1) Buildings. or portions thereof. used
predominantly for the general conduct
of government cannot be assisted with
CUBG funds, Such buildings Include. but
are not limited to. city halls and other
headquarters of government where the
governing body of the recipient meets
regularly. courthouses. jails. police
stations. and other State or local
government office buildings. This does
not exclude. however. the removal of
architectural barriers .mder I 570.201(k)
and historic preservation under
I 570.202(d) involving any such building.
Also; where acquisition of real property
includes an existing improvement which
is to be utilized In the provision of a
building or facility for the general
conduct of government. the portion of
the acquisition. cost attributable to the
land is eligible.
(2) General government expenses.
Except 88 otherwise specifically
authorized in this Subpart or under OMB
Circular A-a7. expenses required to
carry out the regular responsibilities of
the unit of general local government are
not eligible for assistance under this ,
Part.
(3) Political activities. CDBG funds
shall not be used to finance the use of
facilities or equipment for political .
purposes or to engage in other partisan
political activities. such as candidate
forum;'. voter transportation. or voter
registration. However. a facility
originally financed in whole or in part
with CDBG funds may be used on an
incidental basis to hold political
meetings. candidate forums. or voter
registration campaigns. provided that all
parties and organizations have access to
the facility on an equal basis. and are
assessed equal rent or use charges. if
any.
(b) The following activities may not
be carried out with CUBG funds unless
authorized under provisions of t 570.203
or as otherwise specifically noted
herein. or when carried out by a
subrecipient under the provisions of
I 570.204.
(1) Purchase of equipment. The
purchase of equipment with CDBG funds
is generally ineligible.
(i) Construction equipment. The
purchase of constructiun equipment is
ineligible. but compen.a tion for the use
of such equipment through leasing.
depreciation. or use allowances
pursuant to OMB Circulars A-a7 or A-
122 as applicable for an otherwise
eligible activity is an eligible use of
CDBG funds. However. the purchase of
construction equipment for use as part
of a solid waste disposal facility is
eligible under t 570.201(c)(2).
(ii) Furnishings and personal property.
The pun:hase of equipment. fixtures.
motor vehicles. furnishings. or other
personalty not an integrol structural
fixture is generally ineligible. CDBG
funds may be used. however. to
purchasa. or to pay depreciation or use
allowances (in accordance with OMB
Circulars A-a7 or A-122. as applicable).
for such items when necessary for use
by a recipient or its subrecipients in the
administration of activities assisted with
CDBG funds. or when eligible as fire
fighting equipment. or as a public
service pursuant to t 570.201(e).
-,
o
o
o
43564 Federal Register I Vol. 48. No. 186 I Friday. September 23. 1983 I Rules and Regulations
~, -=
(2) Operating and mointenonce ~ Subp.rt D-Entltlement ar.nu proposed stateme.. The grantee shall
expenses. The general rule is that any .1 make the final statement available to
expense associated with repairing. ''''' f 570.300 G........ the public. The fiaal statement may
operating or maintaining public faCilities, Th is S\lhpart describ~s the policies include activiti_ which do not either
and services rs ineligible. Specific and proc~res govemmg the lItakjng of benefit low andinoderate income
exceptions to this general rule are Commumt~evelopment Block grants persons or preRnt or eliminate slums
operating and maintenance expenses ~ to r:ntitlemelll communiti!ls. The policies and blight o~ if the grantee identifies
aseociated with public service activities '... and proccd~ ,set forth In Subparts A. such activiti. in the final statement and
Interim essistance, and office space for' \ C. ': K. and 0 lilf this Part also apply to certifies th.:such activities are
program staff employed in carrying out 'j: Enhllc",cnt grqtces. designed t.meet other community
the CDBG program. For example. where i 570.301 ~Iulon requlrementL developnwnt needs having a particular
,a public service is being assisted with (ll) Prior to the ~mission to HUD for urgency because existing conditions
CDBGfunds, the cost of operating and its annual grant. thejrantee ,mu,st: pose atiriou,s and immediate threat to
maintaining that portion of the facility in (1) Develop a proP'!led statament of the he or welfare of the community.
which the service is located is eligible as community developm8lt!,oobjectives and :~~~. 0 leer., financiel resources are not
part of the public service. Examples of projected use of funds. ~Iuding the
ineligible operating and maintenance following items: ~ ( ubmit and receive approval of ita
expenses are: (I) The community dev~ment Hoeing Assistance Plan in accordance
(I) Maintenance and repair of sll'eets. nbjectives the grantee prop.es to will f 570.306.
parks, playgrounds. waler and sewer pursue; and ~ (hI The grantee may elect not to carry
facilities, neighborhood facilities, senior (ii) The community develop nt out an activily contained In ita final
centers, centers for the handicapped. .. activities the grantee proposes carry ,ttatement or to carry out activities other
parking and similar public facilities. out with anticipated COBG fun tthan.those described In such statement,
Examples of maintenance and repair including all funds identified In' .- p~vlded it has afforded affected
activities for which CDBG funds may paragraph (a)(2)(i) below, to ad ita'; citizens an opportunity to comment on
not be used Include the filling of pot identified community developmen the proposed changes. The grantee shall
holes In strefMS, repairing of cracks in objectives. Each such activity must: make available to the public and shall
sidewalks, the mowing of recreational (A) Address at least one of the submit to HUn a description of any
broad national obl'ectives; changes adopted., The procedures In this
areas. and the replacement of expended h hall ~
streetlight bulbs. (B) Be eligible pursuant to the i paragrap s, also be allowed when a
provisions of Subpart C; and fi -.;. grantee deletes an activity from.or adda
(Ii) Payment of salaries for staff, utility (C) Be described in sufficient dllail. '" an activity to those activities described
costs and similar expenses necessary Including location. to allow ci~' to, ~,in applications approved prior to Fiscal
for the operation of public works and determine the degree to which y may 'Year 1982.
facilities; and be affected. ,
(3) New housing construction, (2) Meet the following cltiz. fI7O.302 ~ requIIen_ta.
Assistance may not be used for the participation requirements; ,: tal Content. In order to receive its
construction of new permanent (i) Furnish citizens with i~rmation a~al COBG Entitlement grant, a
residential structures or for any program concerning the amount of cnBG fund, gra,ee, must submit the following:
to subsidize or finance such new expected to be available (Mcludlng the (11Standard Form 424;
construction, except: annual grant. program lname. surplus (2) A copy of the grantee's final
(i) As provided under the last resort from urban renewal setllement, and statement of community development
housing proviiions set forth In 24 CFR proceeds from HUD 8'*anteed loans) objectives and projected use of funds,
Part 42; or. for community develOflDent and hou,ing coverill3 the same items as listed in
(ii) When carried oul by a activities, and the rlUlle of activities 1 570.301(8)(1); and
that may be undertallien with those (3) Cel1lfications satisfactory to the
subrecipient pursuant to 1 570.204(a)(2). funds; Secretary covering all of the items listed
For the purpose of this paragraph. (ii) Hold at least one public hearing to in f 570.303-
activities In support of the development obtain the views of citizens on the (b)'Timin8'pf submissions.
of low or moderate income housing grantee's housm.and community (1) In orde~to facilitate continuity In
including clearance, site assemblage. development needs; and its program. ~ grantee should submit
provision of site improvements and ,(ill) Publish community-wide Ita its flllal stateniant to HUD at least 30
provision of public Improvementa and proposed statement of community days prior to the start of its community
certain housing preconstructlon costs set development ebjectives and projected development Pl'Oll'am year, but In no
forth In 1 570.208(g), are not considered use of funds eo as to afford affected event will HUn accept a submission for
as activities to subsidize or finance new citizens an opportunity to examine the a grant earlier tha December 1 or later
residential construction. statement'~ntenta. and to provide than the first worldag day In September
(4) Income payments. The general rule ccmments on the proposed statement of the Federal Fiscal Year for wtilch the
is that assistance thall not be used for and on the grantee's community, gr!1Ilt funds 'are appr..priated
. . h development performance. (2) A program year ~a11 run for a
mcome payments .or ouslng or any (3) Prep' are I'ta final statem'ent of' I th '0<1 A
thEx I f. I' 'bl twe ve mon pen . grantee m, ay"
o er purpose. amp es 0 Ille 18' e comm,"ft'ty development objectives and h .th h I
. In I d th . II ~u owever. el ers orten-or engthen ita
In~me paFelnnts cue e.o owing: projected use of funds. Once ,the grantee program year. provided Hl1D receives
hPa~entall.,or comedmalntenance. has completed the citizen perticlpation written notice of a length_ed,program
ousmg a owances" own payments. requirements In paragraph (a)(2) above; year at least two months prior to the
and mortgage subsidles. the grantee must consider any such date the program year woul.have
5. Subpart Dof Part 570 is revised to commenta and views received and If the ended If it had not been lengtlllmed or
read as follows: Ifantee deems appropriate modify the HUD receives notice of a shol1!lned
~
Q
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE ,1r1nll~ry?l 1 QQe:;;:
ITEM Assess Hanson Blvd.
NO. 5a
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering r
James Schrantz
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution
declaring the cost, directing preparation of assessment
roll and setting date for assessment public hearing for
street construction Project 83-1, Hanson Boulevard from
Andover Boulevard to 161st Avenue.
The total cost of the R/W acquisition and expenses is
$62,995.
Does the Council want the public hearing on the February
18th regular meeting or set a special meeting?
JES:vv
Attachments: Resolution
Proposed assessment roll
Map
Hearing notice
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST, DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
AND SETTING DATE FOR ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
STREET CONSTRUCTION FOR HANSON BOULEVARD, PROJECT 83-1.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER DOES HEREBY RESOLVE:
WHEREAS, the right-of-way has been acquired and the road
constructed for Project No. 83-r, Hanson Boulevard from Andover Boule-
vard to l61st Avenue N.W., and the right-of-way costs for such improve-
ment are $60,572 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the
making of such improvement amount to $2,423 so that the total cost of
the improvement will be $62,995.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover, that the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefitted
property owners is declared to be $62,995.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk, with the assistance
of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be
specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot,
piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to
cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. The Clerk
shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Counci:
thereof.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED that a hearing for such assessments
shall be held at 7:30 P.M., , 19 at the
Andover City Hall, to pass upon such proposed assessment~ At such time
all persons owning property affected by these improvements will be given
the opportunity to be heard. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give
notice of this hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
19 , with Councilmen
voting In favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution
. was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk/Treasurer
0 Proposed
Plat Parcel Owner Area/Acres Assessment
67300 Ci ty Park 0.50 $ 64
67300 600 Hartfiel 3.12 397
67300 Lots 12 - 16 tl,SA Funds 2.50 318
65926 3000 Schneider 39.39 5,016
65927 2260 ZelaznJ 1.87 238
65927 20 Santa's Tree Farm 58.46 7,445
65922 9000 Laptuta 28.41 3,618
65922 7350/7200 City 29.25 3,725
65923 6000 Holasek 36.75 4,680
65923 5400 Holasek 7.39 941
65923 5450 Hamilton 13 .81 1,759
0 65922 1800 Spindler 7.53 959
65922 1800 Spindler 4.06 517
65922 1380 Steffensen 13.54 1,724
65922 10 Spindler 8.94 1,138
65922 100 Wyvell 26.82 3,416
65923 3600 Griswold 39.10 4,979
65923 3000 Griswold 39.10 4,979
65914 6000 Griswold 38.79 4,940
65914 5400 Peterson 31.15 3,967
65915 9400 Apel 35.49 4,520
65915 7200 Lutz 28.71 3,656
494.68 $62,996
;0
l
1-,
:- "-r'--- .
llJ' .,,' 'j'
: I, .. i .
.',. I{, , ',', :n" '..,.
.. r. ".
ft~'~
" ,
t, .:. ' "'''':''''
71.,1:10
9100
booO
l~ ,)
':~
,.
;
~
100
~~-
:--'--
; NiGHTINGAlE
I ESTATES
~ .-
,
o
3000
<~_.. ....~ _.~..
--"''',
',\
I 83-1
Ll~H~NSON
iAREA OF
.-.::::::--..... I :
~
'.
"",
':.
~~,
o
\
I
1
i
!
"
\
~y
!
12 I~
"
,.
I
!
I
!
r
BLVD i
~
BENEFIT
~
'I j"
:-~_....._.-
/
o
o
o
..
. ,
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 83-1 HANSON BOULEVARD
ANDOVER BOULEVARD TO 161ST AVENUE N.W.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover
City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of
Andover, on , 1986 at 7:30 P.M. to
pass upon the proposed assessments for the improvement of
right-of-way acquistion for street construction in the follow':'"
ing described are~:
Hanson Boulevard - Andover Boulevard to 161st Avenue
All property owners affected by these improvements will appear
on the proposed assessment roll on file for inspection in my
o~fice; and may offer written or oral objection to be considered
at this hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the
appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after
the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the
District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or
Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the
affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to
the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at
the hearing.
The total cost of the improvement is estimated to be $62,995.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk
o
o
o
.
. '
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 83-1 HANSON BOULEVARD
ANDOVER BOULEVARD TO 161ST AVENUE N. Iv.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover
City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of
Andover, on 1986 at 7:30 P.M. to
pass upon the proposed assessments for the improvement of
right~of-way acquistion for street construction in the follow-
ing described area:
Hanson Boulevard - Andover Boulevard to 16lst Avenue
All property owners affected by these improvements will appear
on the proposed assessment roll on file for inspection in my
office; and may offer written or oral objection to be considered
at this hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the
appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after
the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the
District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or
Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the
affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to
the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at
the hearing.
The total cost of the improvement is estimated to be $62,995.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk
Property Identification Number
Lot Address
Notice Mailed To
Proposed Assessment
f
,,~
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
January 21, 1986
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
ITEM
NO.
Feasibility Report/
Creekridge86/l
5b
BY: James Schrantz
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution
receiving the feasibility report and waiving the public
hearing, ordering the improvement and preparation of plans
and specs for Project 86/1 Creekridge Estates.
The developer has waived the public hearing. The developer's
engineer has been reviewing the feasibility report as it was
developed.
A copy has been made available for the developer and his
engineer.
c
Escrow for plans and specs is $20,000.
JES:vv
Attach: Resolution
COUNCIL ACTION
c
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
~
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDER~
ING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS
WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR CREEKRIDGE ESTATES.
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 17th day of December, 1985,
order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements in
Creekridge Estates; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and
presented to the City Council on the 21st day of January, 1986; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study
and declares the improvement feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby order the improvement of sanitary sewer,
watermain, storm drain and streets with concrete curb and gutter for
Creekridge Estates under IP No. 86-1.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct
the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such
improvement project.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby
require the developer to escrow the sum of $20,000, with such payment
to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and specifications
by TKDA.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
1986, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution
was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk
,.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
.T~nl1::l""Y
?l
.
lQQk
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
Feas:i,bility Report/
5c Smith's 86/2
BY: James Schrantz
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution
receiving the feasibility report and waiving the public
hearing, ordering the improvement and preparation of plans
and specs for Project 86/2, Smith's Green Acres.
The developer has waived the public hearing. The developer's
engineer has been reviewing the feasibility report as it was
developed.
A copy has been made available for the developer and his
engineer.
Escrow for plans and specs is $ 4,000.
JES:vv
Attach: Resolution
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDER-
ING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR SMITH'S GREEN ACRES.
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 17th day of December,
1985, order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements
In Smith's Green Acres; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and
presented to the City Council on the 21st day of January, 1986; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study
and declares the improvement feasible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby order the improvement of sanitary sewer,
storm drain and streets with concrete curb and gutter for Smith's
Green Acres under IP No. 86-2.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct
the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such
improvement project.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby
require the developer to escrow the sum of $4,000 with such payment
to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and specifications
by TKDA .
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
.1.::.n"~Y"lT ?1. J ~e{i
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
utility Conn. Charges/
5d User Fees
BY:
James Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution
establishing the water and sanitary sewer trunk area charges,
connection charges and user rates for 1986.
Included is Ordinance 32, a revision to Ordinance 32 and
32A establishing the rate change to be made by resolution.
The ordinance states that non-residential users should pay a
user charge per residential equivalent connection (REC).
This REC charge seems to have been derived assuming that the
average residence produces 73,000 gallons of waste water per
year. (This is true in Blaine.) In Andover the 100,000
gallons/residence is closer to being true. In fact, in 1981
the average was 121,000/res. We have reduced that considerably
by sealing the leaks in the system.
In addition, Andover hasn't billed the non-residential per the
ordinance - the non-residential have been charged based on SACs
not RECs. REC = SAC x 100,000
73,000
I can't justify the formula to date because of the high residential
usage.
In 1984 the average residential usage was 97,000.
In 1985 the average residential usage was 87,000.
The formula could be REC = SAC x 100,000
87,000
JES:vv
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANOOVER
CDUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
o
o
NO.
MCYI'ION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER USER RATES AND SANITARY SEWER CDNNECrrON
CHARGES, TO BE EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 21, 1986 PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 32 AND
RESOLUTION NO. R68-81.
THE CITY CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANOOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 32 and Resolution No. R68-81, Sanitary Sewer User Rates
and Sanitary Sewer Connection Charges are hereby established to be effective
January 21, 1986 as follows:
Fund A
User Rates:
$ 7.50 per rronth per unit
Connection Charge:
$574.35 per unit connection
Sanitary Sewer Fund B
User Rates:
$ 8.50 per rronth per unit
Connection Charge:
$191.50 per unit connection
o A unit shall be as defined in Ordinance No. 32, or by determination of the Metro-
poli tan Waste Control comuission.
MCYI'ION se=nded by Councilm3n
and adopted by the City ,Council
at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
wi th CouncilITen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereup::m said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANOOVER
Jerry Windschi tl - Mayor
A'ITEST:
Larry P. Johnson ~ City Clerk/Treasurer
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOI'A
NO.
IDI'ION by Councilman
tc adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION SETTING RATES FOR PERMITS, CONNECTION FEES, SERVICES, AND WATER USAGE
PURSUANT 'ill ORDINANCE NO. 55, SECTION 3 AND RESOLUTION NO. R101-81.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
Reference
Ordinance 55
SECTION 1. WATER PERMIT FEES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Service/Connection..................$ 45.00...........Section
TappingjMain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15.00...........
Disconnection Requests..............$ 15.00...........
WAC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15. 00 . . . . . . . . . . .
Underground Sprinklers..............$ 15.00
Reinspections (All).................$ 15.00
21/22
9
12
20
SECTION 2. SERVICE CHARGES
1. Testing
Up to 2" Meters.....................$ 20.00........ ..Section 31
Up to 3" Meters.....................$ 25.00
Up to 4" Meters..................... $, 30,.00
Up to 6" Meters..................... $ 35.00
2. Violation Penalties
Shut-off (8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.i......$ 20.00..........Section 6/10/37
Shut-off (After hours)..............$ 30.00
SECTION 3. WATER METER CHARGES
1. 5/8" meter..........................$ 90.00........ ..Section 31
2. 1-1/2" meter............,........... $300.00
3. Special Sizes...............Cost + handling
SECTION 4. UNIT CONNECTION CHARGES
1. Residential. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $900.00
2. Non-residential, Per REC..$450/unit or $4,500jA, whichever is higher
SECTION 5. WATER USAGE RATES
1. Billed Quarterly....................$5.00 + $0.82/1000 gallons
2. Minimum Per Quarter.................$7.00
3. Penalty/Late Payment................ 10%
SECTION 6. The rates/charges as shown shall be effective January 1, 1986.
MarION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City Council at
at
l'leeting this
day of
,19_,
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
e
o
wi th Councilm2n
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilm2n
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANOOVER
ATrEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk/Treasurer
..
...
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. . .
Non-dl.scusSl.on
ITEM Donation/Alexandra House
NO.
5e
DATE January 21, 1986
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
'l'he City Council is requested to consider granting $2,000 to the
Alexandra House from Andover I s CDBG funds.
JES: vv
Attachments
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
..
o
1:9\ ALEHAnDRA
\!.J HOUlE, Inc.
e
A SHELTER FOR BATTERED
WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN
January 7, 1986
Mr, James Schrantz
City Administrator
City of Andover
1685 N.W. Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr, Schrantz:
Enclosed you will find the Alexandra House proposal for 1986 Community Development
Block Grant funds, We are requesting $2,000 for our Emergency Shelter Sponsors'
Fund.
e
Every year Alexandra House loses government dollars through General Assistance
because 24% of the women needing shelter are ineligible for A,F.D.C. These
women are usually only slightly above the guidelines (in fact, approximately 95%
of our residents are considered low to moderate income) C.D,B,G, funds will ensure
safe shelter to battered women from Anoka County.
C,D,B.G. funds from cities such as Andover have allowed us to expand our
programs with funding from other sources. Since emergency shelter is our core
service, without C,D,B.G. funds, we would have to cutback our other services to
battered women and their children (e.g., nonshelter advocacy services, support
groups, community education),
Last year, Alexandra House provided emergency shelter to at least one family
from Andover and non-shelter services to many more. I hope the City will
continue to support our work against domestic violence. Thank you for your
consideration,
Sincerely,
~M~
Director
MG/ra
ENCL.
o
P.O. BOX 194, CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014
(Located in Blaine)
Business: 780-2332 . TTY: 646-6177 · Crisis: 780-2330
~
o
o
o
-
t"
o
ALEXANDRA HOUSE
EMERGENCY SHELTER SPONSORS' FUND
Alexandra House. a non-profit. tax-exempt organization has been providing
shelter and support services to battered women and their children in .
Anoka County and the northern metropo~itan area for more than five years,
The Emergency Shelter Sponsors' Fund pays for the cost of stay for women
and children who do not receive government assistance.
The mission of Alexandra House. Inc. is to break the generational cycle of
domestic violence by providing safe, temporary shelter; crisis intervention;
support networks for battered women and their children; as well as, community
education and class advocacy. Since 1980, Alexandra House has:
*provided emergency shelter and support services to over 2.300 women
and children;
*provided support and referral to thousands of women over the Crisis
Phone Line;
*developed and maintained a support network for women who leave violent
relationships ;'
*provided community education and training to 220 community groups.
organizations. and schools.
o
Our support services include advocacy on legal. housing and welfare issues;
child care; support and educational groups for women; a monthly Legal Clinic
using volunteer attorneys; a resource library; and parenting and children's
groups,
Ten years ago. domestic violence was often considered to be a ''women's issue."
Today, due in part to persistent efforts by Alexandra House. many people
recognize domestic violence as a community problem - a problem affecting
approximately one quarter of the families in our community. Domestic violence
crosses all socio-economic. racial. religious, and geographic boundaries.
Without intervention. abusive and violent patterns repeat in successive gen....:
erations, Several new laws. passed in the last 6 years have made, more options
available to battered women for stopping abusive behavior. Nevertheless,
emergency shelters remain the core of a strategy for ending domestic violence
for several reasons.
eThe decision to leave a violent relationship is not easy; most battered women
are financially dependent on their spouse; the majority have children; most
have a deep sense of responsibility to maintaining the family unit. Women
in abusive relationships live in constant fear of their partners. who usually
control access to the outside world. Alexandra House provides a safe. supportive
environment where a battered woman can explore alternatives to her situation
and get assistance in following through on her decisions. We also offer
quality programming and childcare for children, enabling women to continue to
work or to make arrangements to start a new life.
o
The State of Minnesota recognizes the need for shelters in helping women escape
from a violent situation, Counties are mandated to reimburse shelters for the
cost of stay for women and children. who are eligible for Aid to Families with
Dependent Children. However. in 1984. 20% of the families at Alexandra House
did not qualify because they were employed. Most of these women are the
"working poor" and cannot afford the cost of stay. ($39.00 per day in 1986).
,
o
o
o
...
For example, the cost for a working women with two children at Alexandra House
for two weeks would be $1,638. Most women need whatever meager resources
available to put .a deposit on an apartment, pick up the mortgage on their homes,
or perhaps move out of the state. The Emergency Shelter Sponsors' Fund ensures
safe shelter for all women.
In 1986, Alexandra House will:
-provide shelter and support services to 400 battered women and children;
-provide support, information and referral to 1,200 women and men over the
phone;
-operate support and education for battered women and their children;
-provide education and training about domestic violence to 40 community
groups and organizations.
Domestic violence continues to be a community problem and demands a community
response, Your contribution to the Emergency Shelter Sponsors' Fund will
ensure quality services to all battered women in our community,
Amount Requested
$2,000.00
,
o
())\ AlEHAnDRA
\!.J HOUlE, Inc.
o
A SHELTER FOR BATTERED
WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN
ALEXANDRA HOUSE
1986 PROGRAM . GOALS
Shelter: 400 women and children
Crisis Phone: 1,200 calls
Community Education Presentations: 36 groups (attendance: 720)
Professional Training: 4 .groups .(attendance: 100)
o
3 weekly support groups (750 contacts)
4 educational groups (36 women)
2 children's groups (350 contacts)
Outreach Program (for ex-residents and battered women in the community):
Legal Clinic (30 women)
Sponsorship Program (60 ex-residents)
10 workshops (100 contacts)
New Projects:
Blaine Intervention Project
Parents Anonymous Group (350 contacts)
(l
Family Violence Workbook for children
Police Training Videotape
Community Education Slide Presentation
Needs Assessments:
Transitional Housing for women leaving the shelter
Crisis Nursery (child abuse prevention project)
o
P.O. BOX 194, CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014
(Located in Blaine)
Business: 780-2332 · TTY: 646-6177. Crisis: 780-2330
o
o
o
())\ AlEHAnDRA
\!.J HOUlE, Inc.
A SHELTER FOR BATTERED
WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN
1985 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Lynn C. Olson, Chair (1987)
Anoka
Judge, Anoka County
Audrey Howlett, Vice Chair (1986)
Circle Pines
Abbot Northwestern Adult
Mental Health
Donna Carlson, Secretar~ (1986)
New Brighton
Coldwell Banker
Don Venne, Treasurer (1987)
Coon Rapids
Jensen, Venne & Schmidt, P.A.
Gary Busch, Director (19882
Maple Grove
LaMaur, Inc.
Pauline English, Director (1987)
Columbia Heights
Shelley Garber, Director (1986)
Fridley
Marilyn Hamm, Director (1986)
Blaine
Public and Community
Relations Consultant
2/85
Elaine Hutton, Director (1987)
Blaine
Washington County Child
Protection
Pat Johnson, Director (1988)
Coon Rapids
Mercy Medical Center
Barb Ogaard, Director (1988)
Anoka
First Bank Anoka
Kathy Picotte, Director (1986)
Fridley
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren
Betty Reuther, Director (1988)
Andover
Field Representative of
U. S. Representative
Gerry Sikorski
Jerry Soma, Director (1988 >.
Coon Rapids
Anoka County Corrections
Mary Youngquist, Director (1987)
Anoka
Planning and Management Consultant
P.O. BOX 194, CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014
(Located in Blaine)
Business: 780-2332 . TTY: 646-6177 . Crisis: 780-2330
o
Expenses:
ALEXANDRA HOUSE
EMERGENCY SHELTER PROGRAM
Projected 1986 Per Diem Budget
Salaries
FICA
MN U.C. Fund
Workers' Comp
Health Insurance
Assessments
Other Insurance
Maintenance
Utilities
Telephone
Household Supplies
Food
Office Supplies
Printing
Postage
Advertising/P.R.
Professional Services
Mileage
Memberships/Subscriptions
Staff Development
Program Activities
Program Supplies
Interest/Fees
Board Expense
Fundraising
Depreciation
o
TOTAL
Average Occupancy = 15 persons per day
(450 Residents per year)
141,297
9,809
2,707
807
6,971
467
2,363
10,244
6,384
2,970
4,800
14,345
2,690
250
560
9,000
215,664
Estimated 1986 Per Diem = $39.40 per person per day
o
rev. 10/85
o
o
o
Revenues:
ALEXANDRA HOUSE
Approved 1986 Budget
Minnesota Department of Corrections
General Assistance Per Diems
United Way
Community Development Block Grants
Unrestricted Donations
Interest
TOTAL
Expenses:
Salaries
FICA
MN U.C. Fund
Workers' Compo
Health Insurance
Assessments
Other Insurance
Maintenance
Utilities
Telephone
Household Supplies
Food
Office Supplies
Printing
Postage
Advertising/P.R.
Professional Services
Mileage
Memberships/Subscriptions
Staff Development
Program Activities
Program Supplies
Interest/Fees
Board Expense
Fundraising
SUBTOTAL
Depreciation
TOTAL
Cash Reserve
12/85
$ 93,000
184,077
74,200
20,000
63,106
2,000
436,383
296,041
20,870
5,758
1,717
13,405
467
4 ,725
10,244
6,384
5,712
4,800
14,345
1,500
3,700
1,185
1,360
5,380
10,200
500
3,000
2,780
2,650
560
550
550
418,383
18,000
436,383
6,000
ALEXANDRA HOUSE
1986 BUDGET NARRATIVE
Qxpenses:
Salaries:
1.0 Director
1.0 Administrative Assistant
1.0 Women's Shelter/Outreach
Program Coordinator
6.5 Women's Advocates
.50 House Manager (new position)
1.0 Outreach Advocate
1.0 Child Program Coordinator
2.0 Child Advocates
1.0 Child Carer
1.0 Volunteer and Community Education
Coordinator (+.25)
Substitutes @ 3015 hours per year
Assumes a 4% range adjustment effective Janu~ry 1, 1986
and a merit increase effective July 1, 1986. The Childcarer salary
range is to be adjusted by 2.1% .
$296,041
F.I.C.A. @ 7.05 %
20,870
5,758,
MN Unemployment Compensation
c:. Estimated rating of 3% on $10,500 base
Workers' Compensation @ .58%
1,717
Health and Life Insurance
Health @ $65 per month x 16.5 employees
Life @ 2.70 per month x 16.5 employees
12,870
535
13,405
Assessment
Sewer and Water levy payable to the
City of Blaine
467
Insurance
Package includes:
General liability @ 500,000
Excess liability (umbrella) @ 2,000,000
Directors' and Officers liability @ 1,000,000
Employee Dishonesty @ 50,000
Automobile Liability @ 500,000
4,725
Alexandra House experienced an unexpected 53% increase in
rates in 1985. We are estimating a 5% increase in 1986.
Maintenance
General maintenance (contract) @
O ' $400 per month
Housecleaning (contract) @ 53 per week
Garbage removal @ 57 per month
Pest Control @ 17 per month
Other rep~irs (non-contract) @ 100
per month
M..,-f......"'-..,......,..,... ~........"",.f,..,.. ~ ~C:0 1"'ln.,....,...,n,.,th
10,244
4,800
2,756
684
204
1,200
600
Expenses continued
OilitieS
NSP @ 234 per month
North Central Public Service
@ 285 per month
Sewer and Water @ 39 per quarter
Telephone
Business/Crisis Line @ 300 per month
A T & T @ 115 per month
Residents phone @ 40 per month
Emergency Pager @ 21 per month
Household Supplies
Includes cleaning supplies, personal
hygiene items, diapers, medicine,
etc. @ 400 per month
Food
15 residents @ $2.62 per person per day
Office Supplies
Includes stationary and other consumable
items @ 125 per month
..flinting
W Copier rental @ 200 per month
Supplies @ 75 per month
Outside printing @ 100 per quarter
Postage
Stamps @ 80 per month
Newsletter @ 50 per quarter
P. O. Box rental
6,384
2,808
3,420
156
5,712
3,600
1,380
480
252
4,800
14,345
1,500
3,700
2~400
900
400
1,185
960
200
25
Advertising and Public Relations
6 hires @ 150 per hire 900
Ads for services, volunteer training, etc. 260
Special Events 200
Professional Services
Monthly accounting service
@ 265 per month
Annual Audit
Mileage
Increase in miles (not reimbursemen~
3,400 miles per month x .25 per mile
~emberships and Subscriptions
.., Memberships include local, state and
National battered women's organizations,
Anoka County networks, etc.
1,360
5,380
3,180
2,200
10,200
500
Expenses continued
o
Subscriptions include journals, magazines
and books for staff to keep current on
issues relevant to battered women and
their children.
Staff Development
16 employees@ 100
Inservices @
Retreat @
Program Development conferences, Workshops
Program Activities
Women's @ 70 per month
Children's @ 70 per month
Outreach @ 50 per month
Volunteer @ 40 per month
Program Supplies
Women's @ 50 per month
Children's @ 115 per month
Outreach @ 35 per month
Volunteer @
o
Interest and Fees
Anoka County Food and
Establishment Licerise
Interest on Sewer and
Lodging
@
Water Levy
Board Expense
Annual Meeting
Orientation
Incidentals
Fundraising
Conferences and workshops @
Proposals, events, etc.
Depreciation
per schedule
Cash Reserve
For capital expenditures e.g.,
furniture, equipment, major repairs
or rehabilitation.
o
1,600
400
600
400
3,000
2,780
860
840
.600
480
2,650
600
1,380
420
250
560
100
460
550
200
200
100
550
350
200
18,000
6,000
.."
.,
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
January 21, 1986
ITEM Award Con~ract/Warning
NO. Sirens
5f
BY:
Dave Almgren
Building
Bids were opened at 10:00 A.M., January 7, 1986. The following
is the list of bidders:
1. Electric Service Company
1609 Chicago Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55404
$47,232.00
2. Lehn Electric
214 East Main
Anoka, MN 55303
$54,900.00
3.
Gopher Electric
1406 Coon Rapids
Coon Rapids, MN
$57,204.00
Boulevard
55433
4. Corrigan Electric Company
Rosemont, MN 55068
$57,714.00
Bidders 2, 3 and 4 bid Federal Thunderbeam sirens. Bidder 1 bid
Penetrator 10 Sirens. Checking the specifications on our bid
spec sheet, I find that the Penetrator Siren does not meet the
spec, i.e.,
#1 coverage - Spec 4800' radius
Federal 4800' radius; Penetrator 4500' radius
#2 Maintenance - Burnsville replaced 4 motors in 2-3 years
with penetrator sirens. A new bid was just
awarded to Tonuny Thompson for Federal.
#3 Instructions - Quote - failure to list exceptions or
deviation with description of substitute
equal or better characteristics and performance
shall be cause for bid rejection.
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
o
A.
I
NOTE: The City Council reserves the right to waive any informalties
in any bid received and reject without explanation any or all
bids received.
I recommend awarding the bid to Lehn Electtic. I also need a Purchase
Order Number to order decoders from Kealy-Ruff Company for $10,836.00.
Siren completion date is April 15, 1986 so bonding procedures should
be started.
Total Bid: Lehn Electric
Decoders
$54,900
10, 8~
~65, 736
Estimate:
$:71, ~.8.80
Also, there will be some cost to the city to furnish power to the
sirens at eac..'I si te. This should be minimal (approx. $175.00 total)
DA:vv
Administrator 1 S Comments:
The City Council budgeted the first year's interest for bonds to
be sold for early warning sirens and the Fire Department van ($7,000
interest funds budgeted for early warning sirens).
o
e
-~
,
CITY OF. ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the follo0ing:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
OF PROJECT NO. 86-17 FOR EARLY WARNING SIRENS IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out by
the City Council, bids were received, opened and tabulated according
to law for Project No. 86-17, with results as follows:
Electric Service Company
Lehn Electric
Gopher Electric
Corrigan Electric
$47,232
54,900
57,204
57,714
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby accept the above bids as shown to indicate
Lehn Electric as the successful bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED to hereby direct the Mayor and Clerk
to enter into a Contract with Lehn Electric in the amount of $54,900 for
construction of Improvement Project No. 86-17 for early warning sirens
in the City of Andover; and direct the City Clerk to return to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of
the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained
until the Contract has been executed and insurance and bond requirements
met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by
the City Council at a
meeting this
day of
, 19
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl, Mayor
c:> Larry P. Johnson - City Clerk/Treasurer
~
t
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
January 21, 1986
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff Reports
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Clerk-Treasurer
APP.ROV~~R
AGEND~
ITEM 6.a.
NO.
Larry P. Johnson
BY:
Council is requested to approve the appointment of Karen R. Emery to
the position of Utility Billing/Account Clerk effective as Feb. 3, 1986
at a wage of $6.00 per hour.
The city received 90 resumes for this position. Those with previous util ity
billing experience were interviewed by the Clerk-Treasurer and Accountant.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCil ACTION
SECOND BY
o
. -,
~r'y
;P1.,~J,r(
Yv')
?(~r-fi).
"v- :r
,"J
;1.
,/
,
.
Karen R. Emery
6221 169th Lane NW
Ramsey, Minnesota 55303
December 20, 1985
City of Andover
Personnel Department
1685 NW Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Personnel Manager:
I am writing in response to your ad in the December 18, 1985
Anoka County Shopper for Utility Billing/Accounting Clerk. I
have enclosed a current resume as you requested.
o
I believe my accounting knowledge and experience would be an
asset to the City of Andover and it's residents.
This position would bring me closer to home and back into the
area of work I prefer and enjoy the most.
To contact me regarding this position, please call me at
753-4026. lam looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
:;;~;(~o;
o
,
.,
,
o
OBJECTIVE:
KAREN R. ElllERY
6221169TH LANE NW
RArtiSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
(612) 753-4026
To work in an area of accounting and bookkeeping.
EXPERIENCE: Current - 1984 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
SECRETARY. Working for five people my duties
include typing, working with a word processor,
answering telephones and general office functions.
o
EDUCATION:
o
1984 - 1982
SAFE ELECTRIC, INC.
ANOKA, l"iINNESOTA
SECRETARY/BOOKKEEPER. Responsibilities included
preparation of semi-monthly billings, weekly
payroll, quarterly payroll tax reports, updating
the accounts receivable, accounts payable, and
disbursement journal, general typing, answering
telephones and general office functions.
1982 -1978
ANDERSON, JOHNSON & CO., LTD.
ANOKA, MINNESOTA
JUNIOR ACCOUNTANT/CO~~UTER OPERATOR.
Responsibilities included preparation of payrolls,
quarterly payroll tax reports, utility billings
for the City of st. Francis, assisted with write-
up work for city audits, updating accounts
receivable, accounts payable and disbursements
journal, running financial statements on computer,
typing and general accounting functions.
1978 - 1977
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY
BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA
RECEPTIONIST. Responsibilities included typing,
answering telephones, sorting mail and general
office functions.
1977 - 1975
ANDERSON, JOHNSON & CO., LTD.
ANOKA, l'UNNESOTA
SECRETARY/BOOKKEEPER. Responsibilities included
typing, answering telephones, preparation of
quarterly payroll tax reports, monthly billings,
updating accounts receivable, accounts payable,
and disbursements journal, billings for clients
on computer, and general office functions.
Anoka Senior High School Anoka, Minnesota
Graduated class of 1975
Interests in accounting and business.
Have taken job related courses through Northwestern National
Life Insurance Company: Number Skills, Basic Letter Writing,
LOMA 1 and LOl"iA 2
** REFERENCES UPON REQUEST**
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE :T~n"~ry?l 1 QAh
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO. Reports of Commissions, e c. Engineeringr
ITEM Street Lights
NO. 6b BY: James Schran
APPROVE; tOR
AGENDA VJ
The City Council is requested to consider the attached
list of street lights at major county. road and city street
intersections and locations that the County Sheriff's
Department felt need lighting.
This is the list that was verbally presented at the
last Council meeting by the Mayor.
Assuming 45 lights using 150 watts (residential streets
intersection County Roads)at $18.49 per month the estimated
cost per year would be about $10,000.
JES:vv
Attachments: Street light priority list
Street lighting standards
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
-
\
CITY OF ANDOVER
PROPOSED STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS
c
It is suggested that the City adopt a uniform street lighting
policy utilizing high pressure sodium (HPSl lighting fixtures.
Thes~ fixtures should be used in the interest of energy conser-
vation and efficiency. All fi.xtures should be mounted at a
minimum of 21 feet over the roadway.
In areas that are served by overhead facilities, the lights
should be mounted on existing or new poles.
In areas served by underground facilities, lights should be
installed on 30 foot wood poles.
The following are suggestions for street lighting in the city:
1. Major thoroughfares, i.e., county road intersections, a
250 watt HPS mounted on an 18 foot mastarm.
2. Residential intersections on county roads, a 150 watt HPS
mounted on an 18 foot mastarm.
3. Residential ~ntersections, a 150 watt HPS mounted on an 8
foot mastarm.
<:) 4. Residential midblock lights should use a 100 watt HPS
mounted on an 8 foot mastarm.
The present day charges for these lights are as follows:
100 watt HPS - $3.10 per month + $12.00 facilities
charge = ~15.10
150 watt HPS - $4.49 per month + $14.00 facilities
charge = $18.49
250 watt HPS - $7.32 per month + $15.00 facilities
charge = $23.32
Charges shown above are monthly.
Points for Discussion:
1. 7 existing street lights should be changed to conform to this
standard.
2. An assessment policy should be established along with a pro-
cedure for initiating a project.
o
3. A contract with the utility should be negotiated and a billing
process established.
4. A Park Board standard should also be established.
o
o
o
.f'
INTERSECTIONS ARE LISTED IN DESCENIbING ORDER
OF CONSIDERATION FOR EACH COUNTY' ROAD
1. County. ROad 7
147th Lane
157th Avenue (Co. 20)
159th Avenue
Valley Drive (Co. 58)
165th Avenue-West
155th Avenue
145th Avenue
2. County Road 9
South Coon Creek Drive
143rd Avenue
173rd Lane
157th Avenue (Co. 20)S.
141st Lane
142nd Avenue
181st Avenue
153rd Lane
170th Avenue
134th Avenue
Curve at lake
Most intersections south of County 116 are illuminated by Anoka
City street lights; County 116 is lit by County Highway.
3. Crqsstown (Co. 18)
138th Avenue
139th Avenue
South Coon Creek Drive
Hanson Boulevard (Co. 78)
Prairie and l57th Avenue
Andover Boulevard (Co. 16)
Nightingale (Co. 109)
161st Avenue (Co. 20)
Yukon street
140th Avenue
(co. 18) Crooked Lake Boulevard and co. 116 (Bunker).
4. Co. 78 (Hanson)
Co. 116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard)
Co. 20 (161st Avenue)
Co. 16 (Andover Boulevard)
5. Prairie Road
Co. 116 - Bunker
Andover Boulevard (Co. 161-
148th Avenue
6. Co. 16 (Andover)
Hanson Boulevard
Prairie Road
o
o
o
.
..
7. Co. 20 (157th)
161st
8. Co. 116 (Bunker)
xenia Street
.County 9
verdin Street
Nightingale Street
Hanson Boulevard
Prairie Road
Hanson Boulevard
Crooked Lake Boulevard
Quay Street
Jonquil Street
c
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE 21 January 1986
NOA SECTION
NQ Repo~~~cQ+ Commissions,
Conunittees, Staff
ITEM ShorelimdOrdinance/DNR
NO. 6dl
ORlCINATlNG DEPARTMENT
Zoning Administrator
APPROVED fOR
AC(NDA:v CL
/,~
BY:. d' Arcy
Enclosed please find the following with
Ordinance 71, Shoreland Management:
Letter sent to Molly Comeau dated December 10, 1985,
requesting that the DNR reconsider approval of our
Ordinance based on the facts set out therein.
Letter received from Molly Comeau dated December 19,
1985, in response to our letter above.
I wonder if perhaps there isn't just a breakdown due to terms?
Perhaps if we propose to amend our Ordinance to state that the
Shore land Overlay District "for the purpose of this ordinance
means land located within the following distances from any
protected water: 1) 3ee 1,000 feet from the ordinary'high
water mark of a designated lake, pond, or flowage .~..
In this regard, note especially Molly's Gonunents on page two
of her letter with regard to substandard lots. If I read her
letter correctly, we would not have difficulty in allowing
for the reconstruction of a "substandard structure as it
pertains to setback, etc." if it were destroyed, etc.
I thought I could resolve this matter by letter but perhaps
we would best handle this matter by having Molly come out to
a City Council meeting and work to resolve this together.
Please advise.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO:
SECOND BY
o
o
o
. " .
tf6~~'~T~~~ OF
NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO. 296-7523
~
December 19, 1985
Mr. Jim Schrantz
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Boulevard
Ancka, Minnesota 55303
Re: Shore land Management Controls
Dear Yor. Schrantz:
Thank you for your letter of December 10, 1985. we feel that the best
approach at this time is to offer some clarification to the concerns
you raised. Follmdng are bur comments in the order of your letter.
The statement on page 2 of your septic otdinance 37 does adequately
cover the required 3 foot groundwater separation distance. If there
arc no areas in the city wher~ bedrock exists near the sutface, then
we would not require t1,at the 3 foot separation from bedrock provision
be stated in your shoreland ordinance.
1000' Shore land District
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 105.485 subdivision 2 defines the shoreland
district as 1000' from the ordinary high water mark (OHW). of a lake or
pond and 300' from the OHW of a river or stream. Since this is
defined by statute, there is no procedure to vary this distance. The
only way a distance less than that can be considered is if there is a
major watershed divide. Then the shoreland district is 1000' or to
the major watershed divide. We have never interpreted that the
provision in 105.485 subdivision 6, "the Commissioner shall consider
any feature unique to the municipal shore land in question", as
allowing us to consider a lesser shore land diStrict. It does however,
allow us to consider unique features during our review such as
pre-existing development which may be justification for less
restrictive dimensional standards such as lot size or setbacks. etc.
We do not feel that total development of a shoreline is a "unique
feature" since it is common throughout the metre> nrea and state.
Basically, the shore land district must be 1000'. However, some
municipalities have elected to have different standards for the
non-riporfan tiers of development. An example of such an approach
could be to allow existing zoning standards beyond the riparian tier.
We have approved ordinances consistent Idth this approach, but we
cannot approve an ordinance with a non-compliant shore land district.
Chapter 105.485 subdivision 6 outlines the procedure we must follow if
the city does not adopt a compliant ordinance.
AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
.~:~~
o
Vor. Jim Schrantz
Page Two
December 19, 1985
Substandard Structures
o
Under the shoreland program, a substandard structure (one which does
not meet the dimensional reouirements) is a substandard use.
Minnesota regulations provide th?t a city may adopt language which
allows the gradual el.imination of substandard uses. However, they are
certainly not required to do so. Substandard structures may be
rebuilt or extended by add i.t ions because no one can take away the
right of a property owner to have reasonable use of his property.
..'hen the structure is rebuilt (or extended), it must. comply with the
terms of the ordinance in so far as practicable. If the dimensional
standards can' t be met because of lot size or topographic features,
etc.., then a variance would be required. The variance request is
considered at the local level by the board of adjustmen~ or appeals,
or the city council. If there are particular hardships such as
in-place sewer, underground electrical or water, etc., the governing
body may consider these things in making their decision to grant or
deny a variance. Certainly, if hardship can be demonstrated, a
homeowner can be allowed to rebuIld in the same location if reasonable
alternatives do not exist. The determination of hardship is a local
decision guided by statutes and rules. The shoreland program differs
from the Wild and Scenic Program in that the Commissioner does not
have certification authority on variances. You must send us notice of
hearing and a copy of the local action, but we do not approve it. If
we find the decision totally inconsistent, the Departmen~ would have
to file civil action against the city in District Court. Seldom does
it ever come down to that because the variance hearing procedure
allows input from all concerned parties and most problems can be
resolved during the process.
I would be happy to meet with you or the Council to try to resolve any
remaining concerns. We are so close to agreement tha~ your ordinance
is compliant, but we cannot approve the 300' shoreland district.
Please contact me at your convenience to set up a meeting.
Sincerely,
,\\0\\\ CrC'~CU,<
Molly Comeau
Area Hydrologist
dv
o
cc: Steve Prestin - LlffiS
Don Jacobson - Andover Planning Commission
Jerry Windschitl - Kayor
o
CITY of ANDOVER
10 December 1985
Molly Comeau
Area Hydrologist
State D~ Minnesota
Department bf Natural Resources
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, MN 55106
In Re:
Ordinance No. 71
Shore land Management Ordinance
"L...
t. .t.,,~i- >
'~' .
In response to your letter of November 13, 1985, please be
advised of the following:
o
1
.vJ
'y .
At the time our Shore land Management Ordinance was adopted,
we were advised that because our Septic System Ordinance
No. 37 was more restrictive and inclusive than WPC 40, it
was not necessary to include reference to that Standard
in our Ordinance.
,.tV
:1" ~
~;
.
"1' iv,
(I' ,
\L
Sr ',' ~-l> ".:;" !/],.,j".
With regard to the 300 foot rSri~ as set out in Section
3, Zoning Provisions (A) (copy "enclosed) , it is our opinion
that under Section 105.485 Regulation of Shoreland Develop-
ment, Subd. 6, Municipal Shoreland Management, it allows
the Commissioner to "consider any feature unique to the
municipal shorelanq in question, including but not limited
to the characteristics of the water which may be affected.
by development,
As the enclosed map will substanti-ate, the areas around
both Round Lake and Crooked Lake are developeq and the
1,000 foot regulation would not effect any vacant lands
with the exception of a portion on the west side of Round
Lake which has a zoning of R~l (2% acre) vlith a Supreme
Court Order allowing the development of a mobile home
court at the time this area is serviced by sanitary sewer
and public water. Since this area is dependent upon the
extention of the CAB Interceptor across the Rum River,
its development is still a long way off.
o
Our concern deals with the already existing developments
and the impact the 1,.000 foot regulation would have if
o
o
o
I
Page Two
Molly Comeau
10 December 1985
such an event as the "storm tif '83" were to occur 1n those
areas and the reconstruction thereof.
We, therefore, request the Commissioner to allow us the
flexibility afforded by Minn. Regs. NR 83 (c) (5).
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincer. ely, .~.
(}t/JWGJ ~'.~
~:~es E. Schrantz
Zoning Administrator
JES:d'A
Enclosure
.
cc: Mayor Jerry Windschitl
William G. Hawkins
o
o
o
(B) Shoreland Overlay District
1. Permitted Uses
a) All permitted uses allowed and regulated by the applicable
zoning district underlying this overlay district as
indicated on the City zoning ~ap.
2. Conditional Uses
a) All conditional uses allowed anc regulatea by the applicable
zoning district underlying the oistrict as indicated on the
official City zoning map.
b) Boathouses
]. Prohibited Uses
Any uses which are not permitted or conditional uses as regulated
by the applicable zoning district underlying this shoreland
overlay district as indicated on the City zoning map.
III. ZONING PROVISIONS
(^) The following standards shall apply to all shore lands of the Protected
Waters listed in Section II of this Ordinance withi~ the City. ~here
the requirements of the underlying zoning distri~t as shown on the
official City zoning map are ~ore restrictive, then they shall apply.
U~JSEWERED AREAS
NAT. El-lV.
REC. DEV.
GE~J. DEV.
Lot area (sq. ft.)
108,900
108,9JO
108,900
v.'ater frontage
]UO
165
8S
Setback from ord. high
water mark (ft.)
150
lQO
75
Front yard setback
Highways (ft.)
Streets (ft.)
(bldg.
line closest
50
~o
to street)
50
-iO
50
40
Structur~ Height (.ft.l
]5
]5
]S
Max. lot area covered by
Imp. surface
30 ~,
]O~
]0%
Sewage syStem setback from
ord. high water (ft.)
100
75
50
SEWERED AREAS
(Note all provisions for unsewerea a~eas shall apply to sewered areas
except fOr the following, which shall su~ersede th~ prOVIsIons
applied to unsewerec areas.)
-]-
~~
':T(i
~ 0
0;
:::0
- -
o -
-..,
~':T
N~
o "
::I. 0
--
::I _
CQ 0
~!
CD ::I
'tJCQ
,1
----
!C)',
'"
C'.->
..,;.,,;,;..--
I
I
I
I
.........---i-._-'---.;..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: ---~L
I-
I
I
I
,
------J---
I
I
I
, I
_ L _. /__
!/
~
o
o
<:
~...
I
i
I
!
e
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
21 January
NOA SECTION
NO. Reports of Commissions,
Committees, Staff
ITEM Helico-pter/Heliport
NO. 6d2
APPROv[O.J.~T .~
,C'NOk tp
i
1986
i
I
I
o
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Zoning Administrato
BY:' d I Arcy Bosell '&~~
Over the fall months of 1985, City Hall has received both
cornplaints and inquiries in regard to. the landing and
taking off of a helicopter at 14114 NW Round Lake Blvd
(Randy Markley property). I have also .personally observed
the landing of same.
In reviewing Ordinance No.8,
states: Airport or Heliport:
used or intended for use, for
aircraft, and any appurtenant
for use for port buildings or
of-way.
Sec. 3, 3.02 Definitions (B)
Any land or structure which is
the landing and take-off of
land or structure used or intended
other port structures of rights-
Ordinance No.8, Sec. 8, 8.19 Other Nuisance Characteristics
states: No noise, odors, vibration ... or other such adverse
influences shall be permitted in any district that will in any
way have an objectionable effect upon adjaceIltor nearby
property... Minimum standards shall be as follows:
(A) Noise: (please find attached the DB measurements as cited
in our Ordinance).
(C) vibration: Any vibration discernible (beyond property
line) to the human sense of feeling for three minutes or more
duration in anyone hour and any vibration producing an
acceleration of more than 0.1 G'S or resulting in any
combination of amplitudes and frequency beyond the "safe"
range of Table 7, United States Bureau of Mines ..., on any
structure.
Further, Jim Elling has had a conversation .with the FAA and
they indicate that the City is the only one who regulates
this and only as it pertains to safety. Jim may elaborate if
you ask him.
(continued)
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
TO:
,-..
\.,i
My question is this: Although there is apparently no
. ,act,ivity in this regard at the present time (the landing
and taking off of same) it should be addressed so that
we are prepared for such a circumstance to occur in the
sp~ing and ensuing months.
Does the City feel it needs to respond to this complaint
and if so, how? Do you feel the Ordinance is adequate to
handle this matter?
Please advise.
o
o
e
o
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
FOR YOUR rNFO~mTrON~
CITY of ANDOVER
6D - 3:
Mayor and City Council
Adm~nis~rR~nr. ~i~y ~lerk Rnd A~~nrney
d'Arcy Bosel1
21 January 1986
Temporary Signs
I have made inquiry to the following cities in regard to
"Temporary Signs" and their enforcement thereof:
Oak Grove - Judy Robinson (753-1920):
Temporary signs not to exceed 10 square feet
not solidly affixed
not to exceed 30 days in any
twelve (12) month period
General provisions allows for such signs as
special sales, bazaars, etc. They are allowed in
any district expect that such sign shall not be
within lQ feet of the right-of-way, 5 feet from
other lot lines, and no more than 3 such signs
which shall not. exceed 30 square feet.
Generally, they
is a complaint.
signs either.
do not take action on a sign unless there
They do not have any fee structure for
Coon Rapids - Rick Packer, ZA (755-2880):
Temporary signs are allowed for.a maximum of
9_0. days per year, with a minimum of 15 days
between the removal of one sign and the
installation of another. (For example - if I
were going to have a special 4 day sale, I
could put my sign up for that sale and those
4 days would be deducted from my 90 available
days. At the conclusion of my sale, I would
have to remove that sign and could not put up
another sign for a minimum of 15 days between
"salea" or occasions.
Coon Rapids requires apennitfor their signs but have no fee
for same. In fact, you can call and request a permit over
,
.
Page Two
Tem)?orary Signs
21 January 1986
o
the phone and they will mail it out to you. It is basically
to keep track of the signs, where they are located, when they
are installed, etc. Rick's desire would be to limit these
temporary signs to such occasions as grand openings and annual
events only, otherwise they would not be allowed. To date
that is not the case, however.
Anoka - Carol, City Manager's Office (421-6630):
Portable signs are defined as "not permanently
affixed to the ground, building or other structure
and which may be moved from place to place."
Temporary sign is a non-permanent sign erected,
affixed or maintained on a permises for a short,
usually fixed, period of time. This includes
a-frame signs, sandwich boards, etc.
A permit is required through the Building Official
and they set such conditions as the type of
material used, etc.
They are not permitted in shopping centers.
Tem)?orary signs ... not to exceed 30 days and shall
be removed within 3 days of the activity, service,
product or sale.
No more than 2 shall be issued for the same premises
within one Cl) calendar year.
Kirk Corson, Planning Commission, said that this is being
dealt with at the City Council meeting tonight. The City
Council had directed the Planning Commission to review their
present Ordinance and make recommendations (as above). He is
not certain what action will be taken tonight, however.
St. :Francis - Sharon Fulkerson (753-2630):
Temporary signs ... which are erected or displayed
for a limited period of time but no longer than 10
calendar days.
St. :Francis has no fee stxucture for their signs
and, further, they do not consider the "reader
board" type of sign about which we are speaking as
a temporary sign (ordinance was recently amended
to make that change).
o
Ham Lake (434-9555):
They only regulate permanent signs and then only
as it pertains to the placement thereof - that
.
i
}?a,ge Three
Temporaxy Si9ns.
21 January 1986
o
they do not block visually intersections, etc.
They also have no fees.
Blaine - Kathryn (784-6700):
The person to whom I was to speak was away from
the office but I do understand that they are in
the process of changing their Ordinance to be
more restrictive.
This is prepared for your information only.
be useful to have at your disposal what the
communities are doing in this regard.
I felt it may
surrounding
It should be noted that the Downtown Center has removed one
of their signs, however, the remainder of the businesses
have not.
'!it
Arc~sell
P. s.
Blaine called after I had finished the above and
advised as follows:
Temporary sign is any portable sign, stringers,
banners, balloons, etc. that exceed what is allowed
with a free~standing or wall sign.
You are allowed to display any combination of the above
for 8 weeks during the year. Blaine issues a maximum
of 4 permits per year (each for 2 weeks in duration) .
At the present time they have no size limitation but
their Ordinance change proposes that that be changed
to 60 square feet.
Their fee is $15.QO perperroit (for a 2 week periOd.)
d'A
o
t
e
'-.;
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
o
o
DAn 21 January 1986
BY:
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
CommisSions,
Staff
8 - SlgnS
.. zoning Administrator
In October of this year, City Hall received a complaint with
regard to the flashing and blinking sigIl(s) at the Video Bar
10cat.ed at 13305 -Crooked Lake Blvd. (old Hockey Inn). In
reviewing the applicable Ordinance sections and how they
apply to this particular situation, the following was discovered.
. Ordinance #8, Sec. 8, 8~07 "Sign, Temporary" states.:
Any sign no.t exceeding 10 square feet placed in such a
manner as not to be. solidly affixed to any building ...
in no event, however, shall such signs be placed on any
lot or parcel of land for a period to exceed 30 days out
of any 12 month period."
It should be noted that since the very beginning days of
business, J J's Liquors/Downtown Deli, Bill's Superette/
G-'Will Liquors, Video Bar, Downtown Center (13 shops therein)
and more recently, Speedy Market (since they began renting
videos) have all been in violation of this section of the
Ordinance.
I think we need to deal with the following:
o The definition of Temporary Sign
o The length of time a Temporary Sign can be displayed
o Square footage of -a Temporary Sign
o Number of Temporary Signs allowed
In the case of the Downtown Center, the tenants have all gone
together and purchased one of those portable signs and each
week a different tenant has the use of that sign. Also, the
Chiropractor has his own sign (whether he owns or rents it is
not known) .
MOTION BY
TO:
SECOND BY
4
o
Page Two
Ordinance #8 - Signs
7 January 1986
Before I can really enforce the Ordinance as it pertains
to the Video Bar, some decision needs to be made in
regard to the many Temporary Signs which have become
somewhat permanent in nature because of the length of
time with which they have been in existence.
Please advise.
d'Arcy
o
o
,.
"
o
DATE .T;lnllrlry?l 1 qRf;
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administ.ration. ~ _
BY; James SChrant~
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
ITEM Newspaper containers
NO. 6d4
The City Council is requested to approve the use 0
paper bins in shopping centers and business parking
lots.
The Athletic Association has made the request to place
the bins. Some businesses have told the AAA that they
could place the bins in their parking lots if Council
approves. The businesses are concerned about the
screening, etc.
Attached is a memo from d'Arcy. .
'. ; --,
Attachment: Section 8.01, Exterior Storage
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
--
o
o
,
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
James E. Schrantz
FROM: d' Arcy Bosell
DATE: 10 January 1986
REFERENCE: Paper bins in shoppinq center and business parkinq lots
Ordinance #8, Sec. 8, 8.02 Refuse - In all Districts states: All waste
material, debris, refuse, or garbage shall be kept in an enclosed building
or properly contained in a closed container designed for such purposes....
Ordinance #8, Sec. 8, 8.03 Screening, paragraph 2 states: All exterior
storage shall be screened.... The screening required in this section shall
consist of a fence or wall not less than five (5) feet high but shall not
extend within 15 feet of any street.... A fence shall block direct vision.
It would be my opinion that the paper bins would be allowed (like the
'Jerry Lewis for kids' bins located at the 7-11 Stores) under Section 8,
8.02 Refuse as the paper would be "contained in a closed container designed
for such purposes."
I question whether we would have to have them screened as provided in
Section 8, 8.03 because the screening would negate the purpose for which
they have been placed in the first place.
An observation has been made at the following locations and there does not
seem to be a problem. The 7-11 Store on Coon Rapids Boulevard and Xavis
has such a bin, there are 3-4 such bins on the corner of Bunker Lake
Boulevard and Highway 65, and there are 5-6 such bins at the 7-11 Store on
County Road H2 and Silver Lake Road in Mounds View. In each instance I
personally have not observed any debris around the containers - people
seem to be responsible and use them for the purpose for which they are
intended.
If the need were absolutely there, the City Council could waive the
screening requirements so long as there was not a nuisance created therefrom.
J/ftl
d' Ar!:j
r
r stOrage
.ly
or live
e
urn 25,000
e is con-
trlet
and sales
'hen con-
cy offer-
provided
,mpletely
reets and
nce with
rlets
,bcr yard
o
;witching
uto parts
In GI
lction in
ide stor-
from ad-
es in ac-
I
d is posa I
ed; it is
with all
.nts; sur-
water is
there is
immedl-
the area
. ft. from
ble time
,peration
liding to
,d; ade-
,.,sa.d ee.s..
Jr n
'4 to
ot use
ffeet the
welfare
lant for
35 it. In
t,
signed to prevent and eliminate
those conditions that cause urban
blight. All future development
shahll be re9.ulred to meet these
standards, The standards shall also
apply to existing development
where so stated. The. Governing
Body shall be responsible for en-
forcmg the standards.
8,01 EXTERIOR STORAGE
(A) I n Residential Districts
All materials and equipment shall
be stored within a bulldmg or fully
screened so as not to be visible from
adjoining properties, except for the
following; laundry drying and rec-
reational equlpment,constructlon
and landscaping materials and
equipment currently (within period
of 12 months) being used on. the
premises. agrleultural equipment
and materials If these are used or
Intended for use. on the premises,
oct.street parking of passenger auto-
mobiles a.nd pick-up trucks, boats
and unoccupied trailers. less than
20 feet In length, are permissible
If stored in the rear yard more than
ten feet d.lstant from the property
Ilne. Existing uses shall comply with
this provision within 12 months fol-
lowing' enactment of this Ordllliance.
(B) I n All Districts
The !l'overnlng body may require
a SpecIal Use permit for any ex-
terior storage If .It Is demonstrated
that such storage is a hazard to the
public health, safety. convenience,
morals. or has a depredating e((ect
upon nearby property values, or im-
pairs. scenic views, or constltutes
threat to living amemlties.
8.02 REFUSE
In All Districts
All waste material. debris. refuse.
or garbage shall be kept In an en-
closed building or propertly con-
taJned In a closed container de-
signed for such purposes. The owner
of vacant land shall be responsible
for keeping such la.nd free of ref-
use and weeds. ExJstln~ uses shall
comply with this provrslon within
six months following enactment of
this Ordinance.
Passenger. vehicles and trucks in
an inoperative state shall oIlot be
parked In residential districts for
a period exceeding thirty (30) days;
Inoperative shall mean lncapa ble of
movement under their own power
and In need of repairs or Junk yard.
All exterior storage not Included as
a permitted accessory use. a per-
mitted use, or .ncluded as pan of
a special use pennlt. or otherwise
permitted by provisions of this ordi-
nance shall be considered as refuse.
J nci nerators
Any structure or equipment for
the burning of trash not within a
building shall not be located in any
required front or side yard except
by special use penn It. All outdoor
."cinerat()rs except thOSe for singie-
family homes shall be fully
screened. Upon advise. from the
l::>ullding official, the governing bOdy
may require a special use permit
for any Incinerator.
8.03 SCREENING
Screening shall be required In res-
Identlal zones where. (a) a.ny o{f-
street parkIng area. contains more
.... -. . . . . .. . ,-
\.
All exterior storage shall be
screened. The exceptions are: (a)
merchandise beIng displayed for
sale. . (b) materJals and equIpment
being used for construction on
premises, and (c) merchandise lo-
cated on service station pump Is-
lands.
The screening required in this
sectlon shall co"slst of a fence or
wall not Jess than fiVe feet high
but shall not extend within 15 feet
of any street. The screenIng shall
be placed along property lines or
in case of screening along a street.
15 feet from the street right-of-way
with landscaping bet wee.n the
screening and the pavement. A fence
shall block direct vision. PiantIng
of a type approved by the Planning
Commission may also be required
In addition to or in lieu of fencing.
8.04 LANDSCAPING
I n All Districts
Land which has been committed
to a use shall have for a depth of
twenty (20) feet or more a land-
scaped yard aiong all streets. This
yard shall be kept clear of all struc-
tures, storage. and off-street park-
Ing except as herein provided.
8.05 MAl NTENANCE
I n All .Districts
All structures. required landscap-
Ing. and fences sha}l be maLntalned
so as not to be unSightly or present
harmful health or safety conditions.
8.06 GLARE
I n All Districts
Any llghting used to Illuminate an
oft-street parking area. sign, or
other structure, shall be arranged
as to deflect light away from any
adjoLning residential zOne or from
the public streets. Direct or sky-
reClected giare, where from flood-
lights or from high-temperature
processes such as combustion or
welding shall not be directed into
any adjOining property. The source
of lights shall be hooded or con-
trolled in some manner so as not
to light adjacent property. Bare
incandescent light bulbs shall not
be permitted. Ln view of adjacent
property or public right.of-way. Any
llght or combination of lights which
cast light on a public street shall
not exceed one (1) foot candle
(meter reading) as measured from
the centerline of said street. Any
llght or combination of llghts which
cast llght on residentIal property
sha II not exceed 0.4 foot candles
(meter readbg) as measured from
said property.
8.07 SIGNS
The purpose of th is code is to
prOVide minimum. standards of safe-
guard of me. health. safety. propc
erty, and public welfare by regulat-
Ing and controlling the design, qual-
ity of materials. construction, type.
size. iocation. electrlflcation, and
malntcnance of all signs a.nd sign
structures not located within a
buliding.
(A) Definitions
USign"
A name. identiflcatlon, descrip-
tIon, display. illustration. structure.
or device.. which is affixed to or
_ I__.~...J _ _ __~~~";'t ...J ...J1_ ....,~. ~_
"Sign Advertising"
A slg;n which directs attention to
a business. or profession or to the
commodity. servIce or entertain-
ment mot sold or offered upon the
premises where such sign is located
or to which It Is attached.
"Sign Business"
A sign which directs attention to
a business Or profession or to the
commodity, service or entertain-
ment sold or offered upon the prem-
ises where such sIgn Is located or
to which It Is attached.
"Sign, Identlflcatlon"
Ln a residential district a name-
plate sIgn Identifying a resident (in-
cluding address and profession or
occupation), school, church, or other
non-business use.
USign, Illuminated"
Any sign which has characters.
letter{ figures, design or outI.ne
ilium nated by electric lights or
tubes as part of the. sIgn proper.
"Sign. Area"
The area withIn the frame shall
be used to calcuiate the square
footage except that the wIdth of a
frame exceeding twelve (12) inches
shall constItute advertising space,
or should such letters or graphIcs
be mounted directly on a wall or
fascia or In such a way . as to be
without a frame. the dimensions for
calculating the square footage shall
be the area extending six (6) Lnches
beyond the periphery formed around
such letters or graphIcs In a plane
figure bounded by straight .llnes
connectIng the outermost points
thereof, and each surface utilIzed
to display a message or to attract
attentIOn shall be measured as a
separate sIgn. Doubie-faced sIgns
may be permitted wIth the maxi-
mum square footage on each sIde:
multifaced signs shall not exceed
two tImes the area of single-faced
signs.
"Sign, Flashing"
An lllumlnated sign on which the
artifIcial Ilght is not maIntained
stationary and/or constant .n Inten-
sity and color.
HSlgn Structure".
The supports. uprl&hts, braces
and framework of the sign.
"Sign, Electric"
Any sign containing electrical wir-
Ing but. not IncludLng signs illumi-
nated by an exterior. unattached
Hght soun;e,
"Sign, Ground"
A sIgn which is supported by one
or more uprights. poles or braces
In or upon the ground other than
a combination sIgn.
"Sign,Combination"
A sign Incorporating any com-
bination of the features of ground.
proJecting. and roof sIgns. .
"Sign. Roof"
A sign erected upon or above a
roof or parapet of a building.
..1[". \il'_III'
. I
,. . !
"- i
i
I
0
I
,
i
I
o
o
-~
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ORlCINATlNC. DEPARTMENT
DATE
"'.RO. VW.~ n
;;tcx
With the City Council action taken in December with regard
to the inclusion. of "Pet Shops" under Ordinance # 8, Sec. 3,
3.02.Definitions - BBBB Retail Shopping, perhaps we should
now include therein Pet Shops so tha.t in the future it will
be clear that that us~ is allowed under that zoning district.
Because this is a part of the Zoning Ordinance, a public
hearing needs to be held (along with the changes in regard
to corner. lots) and should thus be referre.d to the Planning
Commission for such hearing,
Administrator's Comments:
Attached is a memo from d'Arcy with another "Not Listed
Use in the Shopping Center".
The pet shop request, along with the 1 hour photo should
be combined into an ordinance change.
Possibly Section 7.03 should be revised especially the
not listed herein part.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO~
SECOND BY
o
o
'CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCil ACTION
DATE
!^CENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Zoning Administrator
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA:
Discussion
ITEM .
NO.
BY: d' Arcy Bosell
BY:
The city has received an inquiry about the opening of a pet
shop in the Downtown Center for the purpose of selling such
animals as mice, gerbils and fish (no dogs or cats}.
In reviewing Ordinance i; 8, Sec. 3, 3.02 Def ini tions _
BBBB Retail Shopping, it st~tes: Stores and shops selling
personal services or goods over a counter. These include
... and similar type uses.
That particular section does not deal s~ecifically with Pet Shops
but could be considered a similar use as it involves retail sales.
Ordinance #8, Sec. 7 7.03 Special Uses states: ... for uses
not listed herein shall not be granted except where the
governing body determines that the said uses are similar in
character to those listed herein.
Since this use is not specifically included in the "list", does
the City Council make t;1at determination only after the process
of the Special Use Permit haS-been accomplished or can the City
Council (govern5.ng body) T:1ake d determination before the
process as to whether or not this use is proper? .
Please advise so we can respond back to this inquiry.
P. S.
It should be further noteQ
grooming dogs and cats but
over night.
t~at they would also be
would noe board any animals
COUNCil ACTION
MOTION BY
,0 TO:
SECOND BY
I
L
o
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
James E. Schrantz
City Council & Attorney
d'Arcy Bosell
14 ,Jannary 1986
Downtown Center - 1 Hour Photo Shop
The City has received an inquiry with regard to the
up of a one-hour photo shop in the Downtown Center.
reviewing Ordinance 8, I find the following:
opening
In
Section 3, 3.02 Definitions (BBBB) Retail Shopping
Uses states: Stores and shops selling the personal
services or goods over a counter. These include ...
cameras and photographical supplies ... photography
studios and similar type uses.
Section 7, 7.01 Permitted Uses - Business: SC District
states: All permitted uses in an NB District.
NB District includes Retail Shopping as a Permitted Use.
Section 7, 7.03 Special Uses states: Special Use
Permit for uses not listed herein shall not be granted
except where the governing body determines that said
uses are similar in character to those listed therein.
I would be my opinion that a one-hour photo shop would be
allowed in a Shopping Center District as a permitted use
under "Retail Shopping Uses."
)R1
d I ArfyJ
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
21 January 1986
with the adoption of. the above-noted amendments to Ordinance
8 and 10, there presents some difficulty as it pertains to
the development and placement of a structure on a corner
lot.
As is evidenced by the attached drawing, under. the present
amendments the developable area on a corner lot is 2,700
square :Eeet,however, on an interior lot there is 3,600
square .feet. This does present some problems if, along
with the. size requirements, there are some unique features
of the land arOund which you have to work.
It would be my recommendation that we amehd our ordinances
to require corner lots to be 105 feet in width and remain
130 feet in depth. This would allow corner lots to have
the same building area as interior lots and still be able
to meet the setback requirements.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO:
SECOND BY
I~.::;. 51
o
SifW
~ ..
~fl
~\1:r ~
() ~,
J
05' YUJ
i lfW'd
.. . .J ~/. ;
~.. ~
35' rur~Mi a5'
T 1
(POl . 60'
. ~rtJ
r~
.M"
.51 a.v tpd
~
vP/ bo'
t
35' km6- rprcl
i
/061 'if I
cvp.
o
.-- .-... ..Jr..... .
.. - 5'4...cf
. .- _ ~ _. ::.~_.= _____ u
. . J1f-64P~k.P 6 a mL /T)VYG ~~
o
Q
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD I :JANCE NO. 8 T
AN ORDINAHCE At-lENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, THE ZarlING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HERE8Y ORDAINS:
Ordinance 8 is hereby amended as follows:
SECTIOU 6.02 MINIMUtl REQUIREr~ENTS
Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit
(Sq. ft.)
1 fami 1y homes
2. fami 1y homes
Lot Width at front Setback
Line (ft.)
Front Yard Setback (ft.)
R-4
R-4
+3..QQQ
7,Q88
11 ,400
85
80
35
38
Two-family lots shall be required to be 150 percent of a Single-family
minimum size and dimensions and such lots would be allowed only in new
plats.
Adopted by the Andover City Council this 5th day of April
1983.
CITY OF ANDOVER
~~w~
Jer Wind hit1, Nayor
ATTEST:
o
9
:0
\
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 8 z
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1971, AN ORDINANCE
KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No.8, effective January 1, 1971 is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 6.02 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Side Yard Setback from Street
R-2
29 35*
R-4
29 35*
R-3
29 35*
Front Yard Setback (ft)
35*
*Un1ess the existing structures would indicate a lesser setback
uni fomi ty.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
2nd
day of
October
, 1984.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
~ Iv-' /.. /./27
J y 1 schitl, Mayor
o
o
o
:i"i, ;"
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF tlINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. lO~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10 AND lOH, KNOWN AS THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 10 and lOH are hereby amended as follows:
Section 9.06 - Lots
a(l) Municipal Sanitary Sewer. In areas served by municipal sanitary sewer
systems, no lot shall contain less than 11,400 square feet nor have a width
of less than 80 feet at the building setback line. .. Corner lots shall be a
.lni nimum of,~Ofeet wi de. with a29 35 foot front setback, except for two-family
10ts.whiCh''''.sfiiillbe requlred t6"-be150 percentofasingle family minimum
54~e-aAa-a4ffieA54eA5 area and width. Any subdivision, lot split or replatting
of existing developments shall be required to meet the standards of the
original development or to meet the average size of the existing lots. On
continuin streets where houses were constructed rior to the ado tion of
r lnance lOH, a opte Aprll 5, 983, t e set ack shall be 35 feet unless the
existing structures would indicate a lesser setback to maintain uniformity
in R-2, R-3 and R-4 districts.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
2nd
. day of
October
, 1984.
CITY OF ANDOVER
~~/W_. /-- ca/
Je y Win ch1t1, Mayor
o
DATE Januarv 21, 1986
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Approval of Minutes
ITEM
NO.
8
BY: Vicki Volk
The City Council is requested to approve the follow-
ing minutes:
October 30, 1985 - Special Meeting
November 5, 1985 - Regular Meeting
November 19, 1985 - Regular Meeting
December 3, 1985 - Regular Meeting
December 9, 1985 - Spec~al Meeting
December 9, 1985 - Special Closed Meeting
December 17, 1985 - Regular Meeting
December 17, 1985 - Special Closed Meeting
January 7, 1986 - Regular Meeting
COUNCIL ACTION
J
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
o
1~1/%b
c~C-.
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE: Meeting on fiscal disparities
I attended a meeting today at the Anoka County Courthouse which was called
by Lewis Finch, Anoka schoOl supt., to hear from Charlie Weaver on the status
of fiscal disparities.
It appears the issue was brought on by the proposed megamall in Bloomington
and their request to the Minn. legislature to have the project exempted from
the fiscal disparities law of 1971. If that should happen, other communities
and taxing districts which receive fiscal disparities funds, would be adversely
affected. (attached is a memo from Shirley stating what Andover received in 1985.)
At this late date there is not likely to be a special legislative session prior
to the regular session set to begin on Feb. 5th. However, during the regular
session Bloomington is still likely to press for exemption of the mega-mall
project from fiscal disparities. Weaver's law firm, under contract with the
Anoka school system, wi 11 lobby to preserve fi sca 1 di spariti es and also perhaps
to repeal the exemptions that have been enacted in previous legislative sessions.
I am also attaching one of Weaver's handouts on the subject. I have several
pages of additional handouts if you want or think the council would be interested.
~ tiII~
CITY 01 ANDOVER
c::> M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Larry P.Johnson
COPIES TO
FROfvl:
Shirley Clinton
( /.2 ;
, --r
~~
DA FE.
January 14, 1986
REFERENCE:
Fiscal Disparities
In reviewing the records, I find that we received $100,892.57,
during 1985, into our General Fund and $25,241. 73 into our 78-2
Building & Equipment Fund (Fire Station/Equipment), during 1985.
I also note that our 1986 General Fund Budget shows Revenue
in the amount of $118,850 as Area Wide Fiscal Disparities.
o
These funmcome to us with our Anoka County Tax Settlement.
Maybe with the above information, you can decide about the
meeting tomorrow at the Anoka County Courthouse.
'.
o
o
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Anoka Hennepin Independent School District #11
Charles Weaver
January 15, 1985
Fiscal Disparities
o
INTRODUCTION
The Minnesota House of Representatives Committee on Taxes and Tax Laws
established a subcom mittee of 13 members to study fiscal disparities and tax
increment financing. The subcommittee met on three occasions to obtain
background information from House Research and receive testimony from
representatives of local governments including cities, counties, school districts, the
Metropolitan Council and public interest groups. Members of Holmes & Graven
have monitored and testified at the hearings. In addition, the firm's
representatives have participated in meetings with numerous local government
officials, legislators and legislative staff.
Besides its legislative involvement, the firm has participated in the
Metropolitan Council's metropolitan significance review of the mega-mall proposal.
The firm not only monitored or testified at Council hearings, but also it actively
worked with the staff and Council in formulating the policy position to apply the
Fiscal Disparities Act to the mega-mall.
As the 1986 Legislative Session nears, the House Subcommittee will be
finalizing its recommendations and the Bloomington delegation will introduce a bill
that will provide the needed state assistance for the mega-mall. Therefore, it is
probable that fiscal disparities will be debated during the 1986 Session and, even
o
1
o
though most local government officials and other interest parties oppose a fiscal
disparities exemption for the mega-mall, it is possible that an exemption or a
major amending of the statute could occur.
The following is a summary of the Firm activities on behalf of the school
district.
o
ST. LOUIS PARK GROUP
In the Spring of 1983, the St. Louis Park City Manager, Jim Brimeyer,
organized an unofficial working group of local government staff to studY the fiscal
disparities law. Membership of the group included representatives from Edina,
Bloomington, Burnsville, Minneapolis, St. Paul, the Metropolitan Council, Hennepin
County, House and Senate staff, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities,
and the Citizen League. The firm participated in the group's meetings as it
prepared to present its findings to the House Subcommittee. The group found that
a number of technical problems exist within fiscal disparities but the group
concluded from its work that technical corrections will have little impact on the
program's effect. In reviewing its work, prior to the October hearing the group
found that some of the technical corrections - adjusting for assessment levels - do
indeed have an impact on the program. The Firm completed its own computer
analysis which resulted in a similar conclusion.
The benefit of the St. Louis Park group was to have an ongoing study of fiscal
disparities by practitioners and, as a result, their findings have served as a basis for
discussion and additional research by the House research staff. The group which
was composed of units on both sides of the distribution equation, suggested
o
2
.'
o
improvements to the act, one of which was to end the exemptions currently in law.
A copy of the group's executive summary is attached.
HOUSE RESEARCH
The House Research staff has prepared reports that have explained the fiscal
disparities law and have distributed working papers analyzing possible changes to
the law. The Firm has met frequently with the staff to review the studies and
suggest modifications. Copies of the reports are attached.
o
The analysis is based upon the impact on cities. As a result of the data base
structure, the analysis presents data for a city and does not consider the fact that
several cities are in more than one school district. In an effort to determine the
impact upon all districts within a city, the Firm computed the impact of a House
Research simulation upon the school districts within the City of Fridley. The
Firm's analysis showed that the impact of the change varies by school district and
as a result not all Fridley taxpayers would benefit from the suggested change. A
copy of the analysis is attached.
METROPOUTAN COUNCIL
The Firm has met frequently with Council officials regarding the mega-mall
and fiscal disparities. The meetings have resulted in the Council gaining a better
understanding of the law and the impact of change such as exemptions upon the
program. The opportunity to meet with the Council is a major factor, in our
opinion, that lead to its decision to oppose a Bloomington exemption in its Metro
Significance report on the mega-mall.
o
3
.
o
CITIZENS LEAGUE
The Citizens League is one of the earliest advocates of the fiscal disparities
law. The League has participated in the St. Louis Park group and has been very
active in its support of fiscal disparities. In its testimony before the House
subcommittee, the League endorsed the phasing-out of the current exemptions and
opposed the granting of additional ones.
Two Firm members sit on the League committee charged to develop policy
positions regarding legislative matters. During the meetings and necessary interim
staff work, the Firm was actively involved. The League's positions are generally
beneficial to the school district.
o
LEGISLATORS
The Firm has regularly met with the chair of the House Tax Committee. The
meetings have involved review of data and discussion of possible amendments to
the law. The chair has publicly announced that the law will not be repealed and
that he does not favor exemptions. Within the net few weeks, he will suggest
several amendments for subcommittee consideration.
o
4
I
o
o
o
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE FISCAL DISPARITIES ACT
February 1985
The Committee on Fiscal Disparities
Sharon G. Klumpp, Chair
.
[
o
o
o
rntroc1uction
The Metropolitan Revenue Distribution Act, better known as
the Fiscal Disparities Act, was enacted by the Minnesota
Legislature in 1971. Concern over the large variations in
property tax rates which existed among metropolitan communities
led to the passage of the act. Communities with comparatively low
tax bases had to levy higher mill rates to provide the same level
of service to its residents as similarly situated communities
having a higher tax base. As a result, tax-base sharing was
advanced as a way to redistribute the taxing capacity of local
governments and to enhance their ability to generate revenues
needed to provide public services.
Another factor that gave momentum to the concept for tax-
base sharing came in the late 1960s with the creation of the
Metropolitan Council. Because the Metropolitan Council and other
entities, such as the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission,
could dictate development decisions affecting local governments,
some legislators feared that existing tax base inequities would
be further exacerbated in some communities if the addition of new
commercial-industrial developments were effectively foreclosed at
the metropolitan level.
The fiscal disparities program was created in response to
these concerns. It provides a mechanism for sharing growth that
occurrs in the commercial-industrial property tax base within the
metropolitan area. Although the program was designed to. work
within the existing framework of public finance and to preserve
the decision-making authorities of local governments, fiscal
disparities has remained the subject of much debate.
1
o
o
o
Research Departm.ent
Q.reClOr
CHaie Pdgones
Minnesota House of Representatives
~i,ln R HODE'rr"dn
')tdn i ,1(r)D~l)n
L,l.....r,j D "'.I{1\,.,..ij
"',!l~r'. n l.lr'"',)
o\S~OCldlt> Director
Thomd'i'" r odd
hllO ~tdte OrtlC.to' Buddin.: St Pdul \.1' ))15;
if:ll~: 296-1)/) 3
l"..i I- l.u,')r.
Lt'~dl ')l:'f\.ICP.S Coordinator
Joel T \.11chael
\.1,1(\ ,l~"': ':~:"""..
::. ~t'\.,.r !-1 L"
D~b0r.l""!!'\. ...~, "'-_n .:""
Kdren \" Baker
James 0 CleM'"
eM\' R Cume
.\.1ohdmed E ldeeb
Kerr" Klnnev Fine
"'drsha Cronseth
lohn Helldnd
Slepnen 0 H 101 e
h.:,~ ,.','....(."...~f-.~ ,.,
December 20, 1985
\.I~~L.t'! '.\ R,l~"'~
E:'TlJ!\ ':in.lp"r)
"'M"- Sh"D.HC
ItmoH'I\ !: )~f0rn
llnda ') i .,\ie,
John \\ ,U.,nr.,
OOUlild'! S ',\ ;i,,)1"-
L"n-:-FAI ..\ on..;
TO: Members of the Tax Increment/Fiscal Disparities Subcommittee
FROM: Karen Baker, Legislative Analyst
Steve Hinze, Legislative Analyst
Lung Fai Wong, Legislative Analyst
RE: Combined Effects of Alternative Fiscal Disparities Policies
Attached are two tables showing the combined effects of three fiscal disparities
alternatives that have previously been discussed individually. A simulation was
carried out modeling fiscal disparities distribution and contribution values for
taxes payable in 1985 under current law with the following exceptions:
o The 1971 base value exclusion was eliminated, so that contributions were a
straight 40% of current year C/I assessed value;
o The contribution exemptions for pre-1979 TIF districts and for the city of
South St. Paul were eliminated; and
o Contribution values were adjusted for differences in sales ratios (to the
100% level), so that areas with low C/I sales ratios would have to
contribute relatively more and areas with high sales ratios relatively less.
Each of these alternatives has been modeled, presented, and analyzed previously.
However, the sales ratio adjustment for this simulation was somewhat different
than when it was run alone, in that this time all values were "equalized up" to
the 100% level. In the previous simulation they wee equalized to the 71.5%
level, a number selected so as to keep the size of the fiscal disparities pool
constant. Also, in this simulation only the current year values were equalized,
rather than the base year and the current year as was done in the previous
simulation. Under this alternative, the pool grows significantly from the sales
ratio effect alone; the other two modifications also work to increase the size
of the pool.
When looking at
Anoka is a big
their benefit.
counties, the largest impacts are seen in Anoka and Hennepin.
gainer because each of the three individual impacts work out to
Conversely, Hennepin county loses significantly through the
.~.,:'
Research Department
o
Minnesota House of Representatives
December 20, 1985
Page 2
elimination of the base and the exemptions, while it gains a little back through
the sales ratio correction. The only loser besides Hennepin county was Dakota
county, which went from a net overall gainers to a net overall contributors.
Ramsey county and, to a lesser extent Carver and Washington counties, came out
as significant gainers also.
Cities with impacts over $10 million are as follows:
Winners
Change in Net
Fiscal Disparities
Gain/Loss
(millions)
Change in Net
Fiscal Disparities
Gain/Loss
(mi 11 ions)
Brooklyn Park
Coon Rapids
Blaine
Map Ie Grove
White Bear Lake
Apple Valley
Richfield
New Brighton
o
Losers
$30.7
26.1
20.0
12.6
12.3
12.2
11. 2
10.6
Minneapolis
Bloomington
Edina
Golden Valley
St. Louis Park
Maplewood
Burnsvi lie
Oak Park Heights
Eagan
Shakopee
-$92.6
- 64.3
37.8
27 .0
23.2
23.1
17.9
17.9
15.0
12.9
County Impact of Simultaneously Eliminating 1971 Base Year Values,
Eliminating Pre-1979 TIF District Exemptions, and Adjusting for Sales Ratios
on Fiscal Disparities Contribution/Distribution Values, Payable 1985
(thousands)
Current Current Current Ad jus t Adjust Ad jus t
Distr Contr Gain/ Distr Contr Gain/
(Loss) (Loss)
Anoka $ 164,731 $ 81,772 $ 82,964 $ 332,163 142,831 $189,335
Carver 25,018 13,667 11 ,352 50,312 25,628 24,684
Dakota 125,064 114,131 10,935 257,923 268,696 (10,776)
Hennepin 528,816 679,095 (150,281 ) 1,084,625 1,386, 288 (301,662)
Ramsey 313,837 312,727 1, 110 650,893 613,835 37,061
Scott 27,715 23,963 3,753 56,872 51,159 5,712
Washington 78,333 38 , 165 40,168 160,257 104,606 55,650
0 TOTAL $1,263,514 $1,263,520 $ 1 $2,593,045 $2,593,043 $ 4
0
-<.
w
Ul
<{
Z CD
0 w..
f- f-
(9
0 Z 0
:r: ."
(J1 3.=
<{
3.= ~
~
0
U
(J1
>-
L1
(J1
:::E
<{
Ct:
W
(J1
<{
(f) Z CD 3
(Jl <:(
(]) (Jl 0.. -'
0 W "
--.J Z 01 ;-
+--' "-... z z
UJ
l- I:: W 0 cr:
"0 :r: cr:
0 (9 ."" ::::J
3.= '-'
0.. (I)
0 (f) :J ~ 0
0 <{
- > f-
0 0
u Y:
(I) ~
(Jl
(I)
0 (Jl
(Jl
0 <{
(f) -'
(I)
-- Z Ct:
LL w
>
Ct:
<{
U
<{ f-
Y: U.
0 2
Z w
<{ x
w
w..
f-
a 0
a
+ "-...
I i:
fd
o
a
a
N
a
a
I
(spUDsnOLl.I.)
a
a
N
I
a
a
n
I
Combined Effect of 1971 Base Elimination. pre-1979 TIF District Exemption
Elimination, & Sales Ratio Adjustment on Fiscal Disparities
Contribution/Distribution, Payable 1985 (thousands of dollars).
o
ANOKA COUNTY
------------
------------
CITIES:
ANDOVER
ANOKA
BETHEL
BLAINE
CENTERVILLE
CIRCLE PINES
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
COON RAP IDS
EAST BETHEL
FRIDLEY
HAl1 LAKE
HILLTOP
LEXINGTON
LINO LAKES
RAMSEY
SPRNG LK PRK
ST FRANCIS
o
TOWNS:
BURNS
COLUMBUS
LINWOOD
OAK GROVE
COUNTY TOTAL:
CARVER COUNTY
-------------
-------------
CITIES:
CARVER
CHANHASSEN
CHASKA
COLOGNE
HAMBURG
MA YER
NEW GER.'1ANY
NORWOOD
VICTORIA
WACONIA
',.{ A TERTOWN
YOUNG AMERICA
TOWNS:
BENTON
CAMDEN
CHASKA
DAHLGREN
HANCOCK
HOLLYWOOD
LAKE TOWN
SAN FRANCISCO
\</ACONIA
WATERTOWN
YOUNG AMERICA
COUNTY TOTAL:
o
CURRENT
DISTR
8,286
11,923
332
29,109
752
3,374
13,665
32,578
6,174
18,144
7,039
1,276
2,576
4,567
9,077
5,359
1,137
1,320
2,564
2,461
3,018
164.731
577
3,522
7,187
489
455
353
404
1,255
817
1,736
2,333
t,271
278
266
121
433
119
413
1,262
227
577
637
286 ,
25,018
CURRENT
CONTR
1,697
7,064
69
14,883
196
425
4,695
12,435
786
29,836
1,704
299
364
885
3.043
2, 122
570
32
319
168
180
81,772
117
1,032
6,296
226
50
62
35
411
526
1,116
561
249
692
82
17
280
25
81
175
54
141
1, 215
224
13,667
CURRENT
GAIN/
(LOSS)
6,590
4,859
263
14,227
557
2,950
8.970
20.144
5,388
(11.691)
5,335
977
2.212
3,681
6,034
3,237
567
1,288
2,245
2.293
2,838
82,964
461
2,490
892
262
405
291
370
844
291
620
1,772
1.023
( 415 )
183
104
153
94
332
1,087
173
436
(578)
62
11,352
ADJUST
DISTR
16,474
24.252
636
57,858
1.512
7,486
27,606
65,803
12,293
36,975
13,992
2.667
5,214
9,454
18, 180
10,716
2,293
2,633
5,145
4,916
6,058
332.163
1,122
7,137
14,376
978
897
679
804
2,499
1,614
3,635
4,847
2,556
569
545
237
850
243
810
2.477
445
1, 132
1,274
586
50,312
ADJUST
CONTR
2.344
13,009
107
23,578
298
806
12,843
19,573
1,202
53, 175
2,615
673
682
1,522
4.748
3,416
909
165
577
216
267
142.831
221
5,054
9.353
410
96
107
82
684
804
2,636
955
439
1.313
159
23
422
34
151
307
76
263
1,705
334
25.628
ADJUST
GAIN;
(LOSS)
14,131
11 , 243
529
34,180
1,214
6,680
14,763
46,224
11,091
( 16, 200 )
11,377
1,994
4,533
7,932
13,433
7,299
1,384
2,469
4,568
4,700
5,791
189,335
901
2.083
5,023
568
802
573
722
1,814
809
999
3.892
2.117
(744 )
386
214
428
209
659
2,170
369
869
( 431)
252
24,684
~vIJJ~~tl~ti ~l~c~~ '~1 ~~Il Q~~~ ~~lm~r}d~10n, pre-l~l~ flf Ulstrlct Exemption
Elimination. & Sales Ratio Adjustment on Fiscal Disparities
Contribution/Distribution, Payable 1985 (thousands of dollars).
o
DAKOTA COUNTY
-------------
-.------------
CITIES:
o
APPLE VALLEY
BURNSVILLE
COATES
EAGAN
FARMINGTON
HAMPTON
HASTINGS
INVER GROVE HT
LAKEVILLE
LILYDALE
MENOOTA
MENDOT A HE IGHTS
MIESVILLE
NEW TRIER
RANDOLPH
ROSEMOUNT
SO ST PAUL
SUNFISH LAKE
VERMILLION
WEST ST PAUL
TOWNS,
CASTLE ROCK
DOUGLAS
EMPIRE
EUREKA
GREENVALE
HAMPTON
MARSHAN
NININGER
RANDOLPH
RAVENNA
SCIOTA
VERMILLION
WATERFORD
COUNTY TOTAL:
HENNEPIN COUNTY
---------------
---------------
CITIES:
BLOOMINGTON
BROOKLYN CENTER
BROOKLYN PARK
CHAMPL IN
CHANHASSEN
CORCORAN
CRYSTAL
DAYTON
DEEPHAVEN
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
EXCELSIOR
GOLDEN VALLEY
GREENFIELD
GREENWOOD
HANOVER
HOPKINS
o
CURRENT
DISTR
16.703
19,795
136
12.706
3,179
214
9.699
12.472
10.728
121
149
2.929
104
139
359
3,375
15,464
98
466
10,551
566
179
583
465
~92
317
844
390
159
1,297
72
451
162
125,064
37,483
20,275
36,671
8,407
3
2,823
17.729
3,370
1,272
7,951
14,325
1,268
8,859
777
213
1"
8,288
CURRENT
CONTR
5,604
33,616
115
27,660
1,428
98
3,435
13,369
7,743
407
94
5,494
63
12
37
4,338
o
34
79
8, 143
330
76
238
""'i'
~~.
192
98
508
44
137
116
9
230
163
114, ! 31
73.161
22,407
16,667
.l , 2:;'j
1,359
.g25
5,430
023
734
40.632
46..~34
I .~ i: ::l
....;.......v
26. 337
473
231
14
:0.393
CURRENT
GAIN/
(LOSS)
11,100
(13,821)
21
(14,954)
1.751
116
6,263
(897)
2,985
(285 )
55
(2,565 )
41
127
322
(963)
15,464
64
387
2,408
236
104
344
244
o
219
336
345
22
1,181
64
221
o
10,935
(35,678)
(2,132)
20,004
7,197
(1.356)
1,998
12,299
2.747
478
(32,741)
(32,108)
9
(18,078 )
304
( 18)
157
(2.605)
ADJUST
DISTR
33,835
41,567
258
26,964
6,666
436
19,898
25,759
21.714
249
307
5,933
212
274
720
7, 163
32.391
201
943
21,122
1,122
367
1.196
922
391
628
1.667
765
322
2,570
148
893
320
257,923
78,203
40,726
75,030
17,608
6
5,677
35,583
6,640
2,491
17,001
29,026
2,654
18,545
1,534
413
334
16,974
ADJUST
CONTR
10,543
73,290
219
56,987
4,495
280
10,158
24,856
16,102
1. 118
271
11,724
173
25
128
11,914
15,418
75
186
24,991
031
150
741
790
526
184
878
352
438
196
33
499
325
268,696
178,230
38,888
24,370
1.786
1,652
1,123
17,256
881
1.278
57,456
98,917
2,864
63.689
648
417
29
20,422
ADJUST
GAIN;
(LOSS)
23,292
(31.723)
40
(30,023)
2,170
155
9,740
903
5.612
(869 )
35
(5,792 )
39
249
592
(4,751 )
16,973
127
756
(3,869)
491
217
455
132
( 135)
444
789
413
( 116)
2.374
115
394
(5 )
(10,776 )
(100,027)
1,838
50,660
15,<322
( 1.646)
4.554
18,328
5,759
1,212
(40,456)
(59,a91)
(210 )
(45,144)
886
(3 )
306
(3,448)
__...__u__ -.~--- _. -_ . _......~c; .:.........;.1 ~.o........,..d., i-iL-~-.1.~.I,j l.J..r U1Si:.rlct .E:xempt.':'0r:.
Elimination, & Sales Ratio Adju tment on Fiscal Disparities
Contribution/Distribution, Paya Ie 1985 (thoLlsands of dollars).
t
o
INDEPENDENCE
LONG LAKE
LORETTO
MAPLE GROVE
MAPLE PLAIN
MEDICINE LAKE
MEDINA
MINNEAPOLIS
MINNETONKA
MINNETONKA BEACH
MINNETRISTA
MOUND
NEW HOPE
ORONO
OSSEO
PLYMOUTH
RICHFIELD
ROBBINSDALE
ROCKFORD
ROGERS
SHOREWOOD
SPRING PARK
ST ANTHONY
ST BONIFACIUS
ST LOUIS PARK
TONKA BAY
WAYZATA
WOODLAND
o
TOWN:
HASSAN
COUNTY TOTAL:
RAMSEY COUNTY
-------------
-------------
CITIES:
ARDEN HILLS
BLAINE
FALCON HEIGHTS
GEM LAKE
LAUDERDALE
LITTLE CANADA
MAPLEWOOD
MOUNDS VIEW
NEW BRIGHTON
NO OAKS
NO ST PAUL
ROSEVILLE
SHOREVIEW
SPRNG LK PRK
ST ANTHONY
ST PAUL
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
WHT BEAR LK
TOWN:
WH ITE BEAR
COUNTY TOTAL:
o
CURRENT
DISTR
1.235
1.049
253
14.896
947
179
1,075
215.587
17,158
165
1,252
5,974
15,501
2,043
2,197
16.708
23,472
9,256
564
365
1,919
662
2.938
677
20,054
470
1,098
150
1,087
528,816
4,211
o
3,759
133
1,539
5,015
15,332
11 . 809
16,399
864
9,954
18,267
11,586
78
1,276
188,333
4,505
16,515
4,262
313,837
CURRENT
CONTR
282
1,425
212
9,765
933
33
1,582
237,992
53.938
203
226
1.175
18,075
1.711
1.430
45,561
5,488
2.290
204
1,426
1,355
1.444
2,752
430
35,171
301
3.514
7
762
CURRENT
GAINI
(LOSS)
953
(376)
41
5, 131
14
146
(507)
(22,405)
(36,780)
(39 )
1,026
4,799
(2,574 )
332
767
(28,853)
17,984
6,966
360
(1,061 )
563
(781 )
185
247
<15,118)
169
(2,416)
143
326
ADJUST
DISTR
2,415
2,096
501
31,008
1,922
354
2.137
445,436
34,626
338
2,486
12,015
31,293
4,039
4,413
34,254
46.951
18,501
1,125
718
3,792
1,526
5,848
1.418
41,355
945
2,256
308
2,104
ADJUST
CONTR
493
2.118
318
13.320
1,618
106
2.479
560.472
72,434
420
565
2,917
27,771
3,494
2,802
59.471
17,719
6,554
306
1.913
2,056
2,402
5,055
610
79,646
569
7,758
35
961
ADJUST
GAIN/
(LOSS)
1,922
(22 )
183
17,688
305
247
(342 )
(115,036)
(37,808)
(82 )
1,921
9,098
3,522
545
1,611
(25,218)
29.232
11.947
820
(1,195 )
1,736
(876)
794
808
(38,291)
376
(5.502)
273
679.095 (150,281)1,084,625 1.386,288 (301.662)
1.142
18,541
126
1.303
934
760
7,697
41.436
4, 193
10.738
477
3.598
47.738
11,476
21
2.690
146.400
7.203
6.348
1.048
312,727
(14,331)
( 125)
2.457
(801)
779
(2,681 )
(26,104)
7.616
5,660
388
6,356
(29.471)
110
56
(1.414)
41.933
(2,698)
10,167
3.214
1. 110
8,548
5,199
7,647
268
3.175
9,950
32.400
23.411
32,692
1, 771
19,870
37.102
23,917
154
2,677
391.021
9,587
32.779
8,725
650.893
27,068
205
2,931
1,404
2.321
10,123
81,563
5,905
16,367
876
5,908
75,925
14.841
42
5,594
341,550
9,281
10,233
1,698
613.835
(18,520)
4.994
4,715
(l,136)
854
( 172)
(49,163)
17.506
16.326
895
13.963
(38.822)
9,076
112
(2.917)
49,471
306
22.546
7,027
37,061
~
Combined Effect of 1971 Base Eliminati0n. pre-1979 TIF District Exemption
Elimination, & Sales Ratio Adjustment on Fiscal Disparities
Contribution/Distribution. Payable 1985 (thousands of dollars).
o
SCOTT COUNTY
------------
------------
CITIES:
BELLE PLAINE
ELKO
JORDAN
NEW MARKET
PRIOR LAKE
SAVAGE
SHAKOPEE
TOWNS:
BELLE PLAINE
SLAKE LEY
CEDAR LAKE
CREDIT RIVER
HELENA
JACKSON
LOUISVILLE
NEW MARKET
SAND CREEK
SPRING LAKE
ST LAWRENCE
COUNTY TOTAL:
WASHINGTON COUNTY
-----------------
-----------------
CITIES:
o
AFTON
BAYPORT
BIRCHWOOD
COTTAGE GROVE
DELLWOOD
FOREST LAKE
HASTINGS
HUGO
LAKE ELMO
LKE ST CROIX BCH
LAKE LAND
LAKE LAND SHORE
LANDFALL
MAHTOHEDI
MARINE-ON-ST CROI
NEWPORT
OAK PARK HEIGHTS
OAKDALE
PINE SPRINGS
ST MARYS POINT
ST PAUL PARK
STILLWATER
WHT BEAR LK
WILLERNIE
WOODBURY
TOWNS:
o
BAYTOWN
DENMARK
FOREST LAKE
GRANT
GREY CLOUD ISLAND
MAY
NEW SCANDIA
STILLWATER
WEST LAKE LAND
COUNTY TOTAL:
CURRENT
DISTR
2.765
265
3.239
285
4.S43
2.772
5.274
225
174
660
1,512
460
1,708
446
752
764
1,425
146
27, 715
1,158
2,204
483
14.467
225
3,539
18
2,533
3,589
889
1,243
SO
2.799
2.258
215
2,218
1,106
10,405
134
213
4.167
8.529
68
761
5.510
439
371
3,274.
1.481
146
887
1.582
675
667
78,333
CURRENT
CONTR
495
33
713
34
1.614
3,726
15,083
57
45
69
136
154
413
695
248
172
141
135
23,963
825
1. 951
5. 198
200
3.546
50
1.511
1,477
42
210
19
36
433
60
1.505
2,115
1,525
26
16
1,570
4.415
22
74
8.414
303
456
544
721
172
70
361
8
273
38,165
CURRENT
GAIN/
(LOSS)
2,271
232
2,526
251
3,229
(954)
(9.809)
169
129
590
1,376
306
1,295
(250 )
504
592
1.284
12
3,753
,~
.'
333
253
466
9,269
25
(7 )
(32 )
1,022
2,112
847
1.033
61
2,763
1.825
155
713
(l,009)
8,S81
107
197
2.597
4.114
46
686
(2.904)
136
(85 )
2,730
760
(26 )
817
1.222
667
394
40 , 168
ADJUST
DISTR
5.531
539
6.492
566
10.173
6,139
11,076
462
342
1,301
3.001
902
3,395
875
1.494
1.492
2,804
288
56,872
2,275
4,617
937
29.286
462
7.313
41
5,065
7.201
1,747
2.482
158
6,063
4,503
422
4,768
3,322
20, 74 5
289
416
8,267
17,192
242
1,553
11,858
864
736
6.590
2.964
282
1,757
3,178
1,352
1. 310
160,257
ADJUST
CONTR
1,437
63
1,393
88
2,873
7.473
33.769
113
81
132
247
240
796
1.073
471
357
289
264
51,159
1,849
5.1S3
71
14,319
513
5,787
100
2.S53
3,676
122
589
52
208
943
150
5,091
22.244
3,780
105
39
3,417
10,S30
140
247
16.186
632
867
1,125
1,414
401
244
721
184
524
104.606
ADJUST
GAIN/
(~OSS)
4.095
476
5.099
478
7,300
(1,334)
(22.693)
349
261
1,169
2,754
662
2,599
(198 )
1.022
1.134
2.515
24
5,712
426
(566)
866
14,967
( 51 )
1. 525.
(59 )
2.212
3.524
1,625
1.892
106
5.S55
3,560
272
(323 )
(18,922)
16,965
lS.4
378
4,850
6,362
102
1.306
(4,328)
232
( 131 )
5.465
1,550
(119 )
1.514
2,457
1,168
786
55.650
o
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Mayor and City Council
Cit Clerk
James E. Schrantz
January 15, 1986
Board of Review Meetinq
The county has requested that the Board of Review
meeting be held the week of April 14, 1986.
I would recommend Thursday, April 1 I, 1986 at 7:30
p.m.
The county wanted the meeting ln April.
JES:vv
\
ctKDA
TOl TZ. KING. DUVAll. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIA TES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
January 9, 1986
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
Re: Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 7379-85
Dear Mayor and City CouncIl:
The fol lowIng Is confIrmation of engIneerIng matters dIscussed and the
actIon taken by the CIty Council at theIr meeting of January 7,1985:
1.
Cl~_PrQJ~I_B2=~~_Ir~n~_W~t~rm~D~_CLQ~~I~n_6Q~1~Y~r~
o
Mr. John Rodeberg of TKDA dId present the routing alternatIves of the
proposed watermaln along Crosstown Boulevard between 138th Avenue and
Yukon Street. ^ cost comparison was presented regardIng watermaln
placement on the east or west side of Crosstown Boulevard. He advised
that because of the hIgh restoratIon costs of the lots on the west
side of Crosstcwn Boulevard, It would be more economically feasible to
construct the watermaln on the east sIde of Crosstown Boulevard and
gopher 1 n copper water serv Ices to each of the 10 lots. The west sl de
restoration costs for soddIng, tree removal, drIveway and fence
restoration, and sanitary sewer servIce upgradIng were determined to
be apprOXimately $3,000.00 more than the cost to provide the 10
IndivIdual watermaln services.
The City CouncIl dIrected that the watermaln should be placed on the
east sl de of Crosstown Boul evard between 138th Avenue and Yukon Street
and the 1 n gophered water serv Ices for the 10 lots, as well as for the
Speedy Market, should be bId as additional costs to the system.
2. Cl1y_PrQJ~~t_B2=9~_W~11_P~mpbQ~se_NQ~_2~_~~ge_Qr~er_NQ~_l~_BQQf
.slQP~LCb~nge
Mr. Davidson explaIned that because of roof slope requirements In the
Woodland Terrace AdditIon of 6:12 or 8:12, the developer had requested
that the wel I pumphouse have a simIlar slope to match future housIng
In the area, Instead of the 4:12 roof slope of the origInal design.
The contractor requested the sum of $2,312.00 to prov Ide the
additIonal work to meet the roof slope and desIgn modIficatIons.
o
Mr. DavIdson dIscussed the change order wIth Lawrence Carlson, the
developer of Woodland Terrace, who then decIded to withdraw his
request to change the roof slope.
o
o
o
\
Honorabl e Mayor and Cliy Council
Andover, Minnesota
January 9, 1986
Page Two
The Council denied the change order and directed the Engineer to
request the contractor to proceed with the original design.
3. ~1~_PrQJ~~t_82=lQ~_I~1~~!~rlDg~_Bl~_~ppr~~1
Mr. Davidson presented a report of bid opening dated January 3, 1986,
Indicating that Collins Electrical Construction was the low bidder for
the telemeterlng and controi, Cliy Project 85-10.
CQJln~lLMIQD
The Council awarded the contract to the low bidder, CoI I Ins Electrical
Construction, In the amount of $24,205.00.
4.
.L~rn_Cslr1.sQD_=_Assil.s.sm~D!_Ap,pejjl
Mr. Carlson, with legal counsel, was present to contest the 1985
assessment as It rei ated to storm sewers with I n Wood I and Terrace
Addition.
An area-wide assessment for downstream Improvements and Lower Rum
River Water Management Organization req ul rements through the Cliy of
Andover was discussed.
Prior engineering reports and projected cost estimates were used In
establishing a "Buy-In" cost for existing storm water facilities. A
rational approach to establ Ish an adjusted assessment was proposed.
The developer agreed to the adjustment with stipulations.
CQ.l.In~lL.&;tlQD
The Council authorIzed the Cliy Attorney to prepare a stipulation
agreement reducing the storm sewer assessment from $72,827 to $55,000,
which cost shal I Include $30,000 for purchase of water rIghts Into the
Cliy of Anoka.
SI ncarel y yours,
8L.V~ '" -'.IX
John L. Dav Idson, P. E.
JLD:j