HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC July 19, 1988
r ._~~!'!'_II'?':,~.ll':"I\'I'::,(1~.!..~ CLAIM E.~~~~~le~".!.".Ynlfo~,!, Conveyancing Blanks
Individual (s) to Corporation
or Partnership "
Miller.Davis Co., Minneapolis
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
,19~
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
William R. Anderson and June I. Anderson,
husband and wife , Grantor (s),
(marital status)
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
City of Andover
, Grantee,
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
See reverse side for complete legal.
(if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto,
~l, 1
lam
~0L-)""-._ ~- ~ci1:2-L'4(! '1/1.
J ne I. Anderson
Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here
STATE OF MINNESOTA }
COUNTY OF /JA4JJ::,4 ss,
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this } >T day of 3lJl Y
by William R. Anderson and June Anderson, husband
)lAfv\/'t "VV\!\^lV",V\AI\!\^MI'v'\NVVV~ \I\"I'./,^^.
S A JAMES E. SCHRANTZ \
<:f~Att NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
i~ ANOKA COUNTY
MY,Commission ExpiresJUL Y 91991
'WIl-
li<
, 19JUL.,
wife
, Grantor (s).
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK)
L.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS):
William R. Anderson and June I.
Anderson
1452 Ward Lake Drive
Andover, MN 55304
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978)
MiIler.Oavis Co., Minneapolis
/
Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED
Individual (s) .to Corporation
or Partnership
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No,
,19
by
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
County Auditor
Deputy
,19~
(reserved for recording data)
Paul S. Miller and Kathleen R. Miller
husband and wife , Grantor (s),
(marital status)
City of Andover
, Grantee,
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
See reverse side for complete legal.
(if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belon~..g ~ '
1,Qa
aul Miller'
\ffix Dppd Tax Stamp IJere
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF J1/1/6/<11
} ss,
~~,~h0/LLV
K thleen R. Miller' .
-'PI
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~
by Paul S. Miller and Kathleen R. Miller.
..NvV'tV\JVV\IIA",/~\Mj\JV, '.A",VlM.
JAMES E. SCHRANTZ ,
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOT~
ANOKA COUNTY
MyCommission ExpiresJUlY91991
vvv.
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.,
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
#101
day of dv2- y
husband
, 19---8Jl,
Paul S. Miller and
Kathleen R. Miller
1519 Ward Lake Drive
Andover, MN 55304
-
-~i
A perpetual easement for drainage purposes described over
that part of the Northwest Quarterof Section 2, Township 32,
Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: Commencing at
the Northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2,
Township 32, Ran~e 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, thence East
along the North line of said Southwest Quarter 736 feetJ thence
North at right angles 10 feet to the point of beginningJ thence
continuing North 38 feetJ thence East 20 feet parallel with the
North line of said Southwest QuarterJ thence South 38 feetJ
thence West parallel with the North line of the Southwest
Quarter to the point of beginning and thus terminating.
A temporary easement for construction purposes to terminate
on September 1, 1989, over that part of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota,
described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the
Southwest corner of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka
County, MinnesotaJ thence East along the North line of said
Southwest Quarter 721 feetJ thence North at right angles 10 feet
to the point of beginningJ thence North 100 at right angles
feetJ thence East 50 feet parallel with the North line of said
Southwest QuarterJ thence South 100 at right angles feetJ thence
West parallel with the North line of the Southwest Quarter to
the point of beginning and thus terminating.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Andover, County of
Anoka, State of Minnesota, has accepted on
19 , the above described easement in this document.
Da ted:
, 19_.
CITY OF ANDOVER
(SEAL)
By
Victoria Volk, Clerk
THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE ANOKA
COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER PURSUANT
TO MINN. STAT. SECTION 386.77.
-
Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED
Individual (s) to C,,;p"r~ti,,~~-"~""--
or Partnership
Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978)
Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
, 19 JilL
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
Michael Donn King and Maria T. King,
husband and wife
(marital status)
, Grantor (s),
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
City of Andover
, Grantee,
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00
feet of the following described property:
The South 330.00 feet of the East 416.00 feet of the West 2216.00 feet
of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, as measured
along the West and South lines of said Northwest Quarter, according to
the united States Government Survey thereof and situate in Anoka County,
Minnesota.
(if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging theret I
-;4 ??
Michael
Affix Deed Tax Stamp IJere
STATE OF MINNESOTA
} ss,
COUNTY OF
Donn King
'11~ d ~
Maria T. King, , ~
, . ..~ .,.-' ' .' y:;, .. ,.'
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
by. Michael Donn Fjin9'"and :Maria T. Kino. husband and wife
"NOTARIAL STAMP'OR!lEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK)
~~i",\ TRIX G. BECKERS
, .!lA-\? NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
\~n~' HENNEPIN COUNty
.. ...... My C6m~i$~jon Exp.re~ Nov 30. 1992
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS):
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
, 19..JUL,
, Grantor (s).
Tax Statements for the real property described In this Instrument should
be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee):
Michael Donn King and Maria T. King
]7714 YR110w PinR StrpPT
Andovp-r, MN SS104
7':3 J26/
I
I
I
I
I
Form No. 28.M-CUIT CLAIM DEED, Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978)
I ndividual (~)"to C~~p~~ti~~~~~^'~">-~~~----""-"""~"~~'; ,-~._,~,~.
or Partnership
Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
, 19 .!!L
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
Paul S. Miller and Kathleen
husband and wife
(marital status)
R. Miller,
, Grantor (s),
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
City of Andover
, Grantee,
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00
feet of the following described property:
That part of the South 330.00 feet of the West 800.00 feet of the South- !
west Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24,1
Anoka County, Minnesota, as measured along the South and West lines thereof
which lies Easterly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of the !
above described Tract distant 315.00 feet East along said South line from'
the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the North line of the above
described tract distant 452.50 feet East along said North line from the
Northwest corner thereof and there terminating.
(if more space is needed, continue n back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging the et
AJ'flx De{~d Tax Stamp Here
-Jc& :HlUJJJA--/f- ~\I fLy-
Kathleen R. Miller
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF .1A}qKIJ-
} ~,
5~ day of -J1;z.- Y'
husband and wife
, 19--.!UL,
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
by , 1 e R. Miller
.__ _'.om.... _.__...m ......-..,._.....
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK)
, Grantor (s),
LEDGMENT
'/I.MJ,,^~,,^^MMMN\J\/\N~ '\AI\,V,^^.
JAMES E. SCHRANTZ ,
NOTARY PUBLIC - ~tiNNEsom
ANOKA COUNTY
MyCommission ExpiresJULY91991
)(~/VVV\i\^N"
T' x Statements for the real property describe
be sent to (Include name and address of Grante
i
I
!
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
.. _,~.._,...._.__.____,..,_,..._._,.,...,_..__,.._.... J
Andover, HN
55304
Paul S. Miller and Kathleen R.
Miller
1519 Ward Lake Drive
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
f_l'"r"'.-"''':~~',M~ ::Cl~~"!"..C L~~_I).E:E 0 ~___,___~_inn,e~"t.a ~n~~~ c:onveyaneing Blanks (1978)
I Individual (s) to Corporation
i or Partnership
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
19 88
, -
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
(reserved for recording data)
Dennis M. Flaata and Marcene K. Flaata,
husband and wife , Grantor (s),
(marital stalus)
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
City of Andover
, Grantee,
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00
feet of the following described property:
The South 330.00 feet of the East 400.00 feet of the West 1800.00 feet of \
the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota, as measured along the West and South lines of said Northwest
Quarter. Subject to an easement for road purposes over the West 33.00
feet thereof and also subject to the right-of-way of Ward Lake Drive as
it is now laid out and travelled along the South line of said Northwest
Quarter, according to the United States Government Survey thereof.
(if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto,
~tAU~ ~ . ~~~
Dennis M. Flaata
Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here
~~~ y~
Marcene K. Flaata
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ~.L1:
} ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z'5-tff day of 7n1?~
by Dennis M. Flaata and Marcene K. Flaata. husband and ife
, 19.JUL,
, Grantor (s).
d"l-(~,' r;:?, u_~
SIGNATVRE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
. .
I/~";;.~ SHIRLEY A. CLINTON ~
~t~~NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA
~ ANOKA COUNTY
My Commission Expires Ocl. 12. 1990 I
.~V'V\/.,I~
Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should
be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee):
Dennis M. Flaata and Marcene K.
Flaata
17715 Bluebird Street
Andover, MN 55304
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis
Forlt1.!'I~._~s.,:!'!I_::(l'::'I.!.. CL~!M ~~ E 0 _~_____~,ll1.rle.:'otalJ".l.'o.::'.:~ol1.~eY aneing Blanks (1978)
Individual (s) to Corporation
or Partnership
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
,19 JlJL
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
Wendell D. Emmans and Sarah J. Emmans.
husband and wife ,Grantor (s),
(marital status)
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
citv of Andover
, Grantee,
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
See reverse side for complete legal.
(if more space is needed, continue on back) ~
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging f)1eie~~ /7C
to~ tV >};(~/'~~
Wendell D. Emmans
.,L. f.. Q, t"'~M'
Sarah J. Emmans
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
by Wendell ~ Fmm~n~ ~nn S~r~h T Rmm~n~,
Affix Del'd Tax Stamp lIere
STATE OF MINNESOTA
II /J 0 I<A-
} ss,
COUNTY OF
7lM,.,jI.,'ANvV'"V ,,^^flJ\.'\f..,,\.'\"'^MAf'. \lv'..V,^^.
JAMES E. SCHRANTZ ~
NOTA,RY PU,8UC - M,iNllEsom ?,
f,Not,1\ COUI'ITY ->
MyCommis:;ion [\i,1f']sJULY919tn ~
)C:VVVVV'\lVVVVV'/V',iWV'v'V'V\NVWv"\i'lV"'iVVV:t
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS):
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
24- -rft. day of ,;1;111/
nllc:h~nrl rlnn WiT,::lo
,19~,
Wendell D. Emmans and Sarah J.
Emmans
1412 Ward Lake Drive
Andover, MN 55304
Miller.Oavis Co., MInneapolis
Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978)
r--"~I ~divid~;IT~)t; c~;p;;;~ti~-~-----_."_.,-".,-,~,,._,.."~._-~._,_. '-'.- .,_..,-,,~..- .-. ....
I o:~r:::::uent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
I', of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
I ,19
!
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
i
I
by
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Dat~
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
County Auditor
Deputy
19 88
, -
(reserved for recording data)
Lawrence J. Audette and Margaret Ruth Audette,
husband and wife , Grantor (s),
(marital status)
City of Andover
, Grantee,
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
See reverse side for complete legal.
(if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto,
l~~ 5/-U~zJ2~
, Lawrence ~. Audette
Affix Deed Tax Stamp lIen'
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF a~
} ss,
/):(k~~Y !( uI:k tt.1. c! &7iz
Ma garet Ruth Audette
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .;(,2 ~ day of 7?lGZ,V-
by Lawrence J. Audette and Marqaret Ruth Audette. husband and
. .
Ii)?'.~ SHIRlEY A. ClINTON I
~ " NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA
. ANOKA COUNTY
My Commission Expires oct. 12. 1990
. .
.---_...
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS):
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
,19~,
wife
, Grantor (s),
du/v&<.-? 0, rh~
SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should
be sent to (Include name and address ot Grantee):
Lawrence J. Audette and Margaret
Ruth Audette
1364 Ward Lake Drive
Andover. MN 55304
Form No, 28.M-aUIT CLAIM DEED
r--..-----.. ______,_n
Individual (s) to Corporation
Dr Partnership
i
I
I
I
,
Minnesota Uniform Conyeyenelns Blanks (197S)
Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
----I
I
i
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
,19~
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Garrett M. Heltemes and Judith E. Heltemes.
husband and wife ,Grantor(s),
(marital statusl
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to Ci tv of Andover
, Grantee,
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00
feet of the following described property:
That part of the South 330.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2,
Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of the West
2216.00 feet thereof as measured along the West and South lines, respec-
tively, of said Northwest Quarter.
Reserving an easement for road purposes over the West 33.00 feet thereof
and also subject to the right-of-way of Ward Lake Drive as it is now laid
out and travelled along the South line of said Northwest Quarter.
Reserving an easement for utilities over the West 43.00 feet thereof.
(if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging the].
, QIlAtt{7n.. 7lc1o~=
Garrett M. Heltemes
.\ fflx U(,l'd Tax :~tarnp lien'
9!:Ld~ ~~;J
Judith E. Heltemes
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ANO k-4-
} Y.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
by Garrett M. Heltemes and Judith E. Heltemes, husband and wife
, 19-IDL,
, Grantor (s).
..,-
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) I
I
t
i
"..,.._1
)lMM~MAM"
JAMES E. SCHRANTZ I
NOTARY PUBLIC" MINNESOTA
. ANOKA COUNTY
MyCommission ExpiresJUlY91991
YVV"
ax Statementl tor the real property de.cribe
be .ent to (Include name and addle.. of Or II
...-_... ....-.-".- ....----. -.-.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS): i
I
I
i
I
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.,
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Garrett M. Heltemes and Judith E.
Heltemes
17715 Yellow Pine Street
Andover, MN 55304
U01
i I
I
I i___,_
I
L._..._..___~_____
I
._.._____._.._..,.-J
Form ,~?:.,2,~:/In::l!.lJ!!,c::!:AIMI?~~__.,_~~nnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978)
Individual (5) to Corporation
or Partnership
MiUer~Davis Co.. Minneapolis
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
County Auditor
by
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
Deputy
,19~
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
William R. Anderson and June I.
husband and wife
(marital status)
Anderson.
, Grantor (s),
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
City of Andover
, Grantee,
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
See reverse side for complete legal.
(if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging t e (0.
Affix Deed Tax Stamp lIere
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF f}dt/OKtr
} ss.
~ 1, CL.Ju,""
June I. Anderson
J vt; ,
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ' 0 day of
by William R. Anderson and June I. Anderson, husband
JlMr'" V'o/IfINIJIA~^^^M^MNVV\^N'^^^''^^.
~ ~ JAMES E. SCHRANTZ \
~~d!.illi' NOTARY ,PUBLIC - tl/INNESOTA
{~!, ANOt(A COUNTY
~ My CommissIOn Expires JULY 91991
.V'M.~'\lvwvvvvvvvv.......^N.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS):
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
dVn/e-
and wife
, 19.JUL,
, Grantor (s).
LEDGMENT
Tax Statements for the real property describe
be sent to (Include name and address of Grante
William R. Anderson and June I.
Anderson
1452 Ward Lake Drive
Andover, MN 55304
Minnesota Unltonn Conveyanclnl Blanks (1978)
Miller-Davis Co.. Minneapolis
Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED
n;;-diVidUallS) toCorporation '
I ;r Partnership
I No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
: of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
by
County Auditor
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
,19~
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
I
(reserved for recording data)
Manlev F. Maqnuson
lmarital stetus)
, Grantor (8),
City of Andover
, Grantee,
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
See reverse side for complete legal.
(if more space is neaded, continue on beck)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto,
;\ ffix Llf~l'd Tax ::Jtarnp Here
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF OA1~~
} ~.
If/Lt tf /77' r ~rcc:~u/~
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this C'("7.y<'l{ day of >??tzy
by Manley F. Ma'i1nllson
i NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) 'I
I
I
I
. ~~
Ii)~'; SHIRLEY A. CtlNTON ~
" NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA <
. ANOKA COUNTY ~
My Commission Expires Oct. 12, l~I}O ;,
XWWVVVVVVV'WI/VI/WWIIV'WVWVV":,',' '
"""....,..___1
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DaAFTED BY,(NAM'E AND ADDRESS); I
,
I
I
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.,
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
#101
,
I
I
I
!
1
I
""..,_",.""..J
, 1aJUL,
, Grantor (s).
A:vt/'k t? e&.,..L~
SIGNATURI!;;l:lF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Tax Statements for the real property described in tbia instrument should
be lent to (Include name and addleu of Grantee):
Manley F. Magnuson
17900 Ward Lake Drive
Andover, MN 55304
I
I
!
i
I
I
I
.."'.._......._.._..,..J
Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978)
,.,'''''"'' ~ ....H'~_...p ."~'~__"_ _'~"._..'_"'~._'_ww,
Individual (5) to Corporation
or Partnership
Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
1988
, -
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
Sylvia M. Britton,
single
(marital status)
, Grantor (s),
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
City of Andover
, Grantee,
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00
feet of the following described property:
That part of the South 330.00 feet of the West 800.00 feet of the South-
west Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota, as measured along the South and West lines thereo
which lies westerly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of the
above described Tract distant 315.00 feet East along said South line from
the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the North line of the above
described tract distant 452.50 feet East along said North line from the
Northwest corner thereof and there terminating.
(if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging ther to.
Affix Deed Tax Stamp llere
STATE OF MINNESOTA
} ss,
COUNTY OF
Anoka
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
by Sylvia M. Britton, single
3rd
day of
June
, 19.J!..!L,
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK)
IA."~"'AA'~::~Bl~~~~~E~~:'~ ~
ANOKA COUNTY f.
My Comm. Exp. 4-28-92 j'
X'Y~"f""W"l"~7nVV~."f",~v"'';. ..,
, Grantor (s),
Tax Statements for the real property described In this instrument should
be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee):
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS):
Sylvia M. Britton
17725 Hanson Blvd. N. W.
Andover, MN 55304
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
, '.
'16 c:.c.
"7/1<1; ?8
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
July 14, 1988
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Conestoga Rovers & Associates, Ltd.
651 Colby Drive
Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1C2
CANADA
Dear Mr. Van Norman:
Re: Waste Disposal Engineering Site Response Action Final Design Report
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has completed the review of
the Response Action Final Design (RAFD) 'Report dated June 6,1988, and your
June 11, 1988, letter regarding the revised landfill cap selection. These
submittals for the Waste Disposal Engineering Site (Site) in Andover, Minnesota,
were made pursuant to Task E of Section VI of Exhibits A and B to the Response
Order by Consent (Order) dated March 27, 1984. Pursuant to Part VII of the
Order, the MPCA staff approves the RAFD Report with the following modifications
included:
Page 7: Section 3.1 Basis of the Design
Waste extending beyond the existing property boundaries, between the east
definition of the landfill and Hanson Boulevard, shall be moved to the
interior of the'landfill in order to properly install the cap. Based on
discussions with representatives of the City of Andover and Anoka County,
utility work during the past spring confirmed the presence of waste to
Hanson Boulevard. This finding goes along with earlier reports that waste
was removed during the construction of Hanson Boulevard.
Page 8: Section 3.2 Contour Design
The existing wetland area southwest of the Site (west of well nest W-23)
shall be utilized to receive additional surface water runoff from the cap.
In allowing more of the landfill surface runoff to flow towards this
wetland, the need to build the slope on the southwestern corner of the cap
will be reduced and the size of the proposed retention pond (northwest of
the landfill) will also be reduced. The slope reduction on the
southwestern corner of the cap will also minimize visual impacts to the
residential areas south and southwest of the Site.
Phone:
520 Lafayette Road, 51. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Regional Offices' Duluth/BrainerdlDetroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 2
In aaoltlon, any wastes excavated during the installation of the cut-off
wall shall be incorporated into the fill and completely covered by the cap.
Page 10: Section 3.3 Surface Water Drainage
Swales shall be added along the western and southern boundaries (western
half) of the cap to reduce the impact on adjacent properties from cap
runoff. The swales will allow surface water to flow towards the wetland
southwest of well nest W-23 and along the eastern northeastern boundaries of
the cap and will discharge to a retention pond northeast of the Site.
The size of the proposed retention pond northeast of the landfill shall be
reduced to maintain an adequate buffer for the residences along Crosstown
Boulevard. In addition, as indicated above, plans for a retention pond
northeast of the landfill shall be developed to handle the runoff from the
northeastern portion of the cap. The cap contours may have to be redesigned
to direct more runoff to the northeastern retention pond and existing
southwestern wetlands in order to enable a reduction in the size of the
northwestern wetland. Plans 2 and 3 shall be modified to reflect these
requirements. Furthermore, additional detailed information is needed to
demonstrate that the retention pond(s} will be adequate. Such information,
which includes hydraulic capacity of ponds, 100-year storm flow, and
residence time of ponds, shall be submitted to the MPCA and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with 30 days following the receipt of
thi s 1 etter.
MPCA staff recognizes the fact that part of the northeast property is
privately owned. The possibility of exchanging the Waste Disposal
Engineering property north of Coon Creek for the private property south of
Coon Creek is being actively pursued. The fact that this private property
is effectively isolated for all practical purposes may make such an exchange
attractive. It will also eliminate the need to reduce the wastes in Area 3,
as noted on Plan 2.
Pages 12-15: Sections 4.0 - 4.2 Landfill Cap - Component Design
The substitutions of the 2-foot clay low-permeability layer for the
originally proposed lime sludge (as detailed in the June 11, 1988, Addendum)
is acceptable. The performance history of a clay-layer is better
established than the lime sludge.
Page 26: Section 4.3 Sand Drainage Layer
A 12-inch drainage layer as originally proposed in the RAFD Report shall be
required to ensure adequate drainage above the clay layer in conformance
with the Resource Conservation Recovery Act Technical Performance Standards
and consistent with the Record of Decision (ROD). The proposal in the
June 11, 1988, Addendum is not acceptable.
.
,
'~J ~?J "'. "" ~~ ';o,'~" ,
:NW'~N"'~';.
e
(
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 3
Page 29: Section 4.5 Common Fill Layer
Prior to placement, the material for the common fill layer shall be tested
to ensure compliance with Anoka County requirements. A testing proposal
shall be developed and submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval
within 30 days following receipt of this letter. As part of this review,
Anoka County comments will be incorporated in the approval of the testing
proposal.
Page 30: Section 4.6 Topsoil
Prior to placement, the material for the topsoil layer shall be tested to
ensure compliance with the Anoka County requirements. A testing proposal
shall be developed and submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval
within 30 days following receipt of this letter. As part of this review,
Anoka County comments will be incorporated in the approval of the testing
proposal.
Page 39: Section 5.2 Extraction Well System Design
Monitoring of the Upper Sand below the gray silt shall be required in order
to ensure that the extraction system is performing adequately and
effectively in preventing off-site contaminant movement. The proposal for
the installation of eight extraction wells in the upper part of the Upper
Sand aquifer is acceptable.
Page 43: Section 6.2.1 Extraction Well Design
The extraction wells shall meet the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH)
requirements. The proposed single check value at the force main connection
(Figure 6.1) may not be acceptable to the MDH.
Page 48: Section 6.3 Groundwater Treatment System
The following details, regarding the treatment system, shall be submitted
within 30 days of receipt of this letter for review and approval by the MPCA
and EPA:
(1 )
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5 )
(6)
(7)
. tower dimensions (height and diameter)
air-flow rates
blower rates
packer medium
plumbing design for tower assembly
description of pre-treatment with carbon
treatment
defcription of operation and maintenance
or vapor phase carbon
requi rements.
This information is required to properly evaluate the effectiveness and the
potential impacts of an air stripper assembly.
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 4
In addition, an air quality impact analysis shall be conducted and the
results submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval. The analysis
shall include a determination of property line air concentrations of each
pollutant using either dispersion modeling or actual measurements (if
available) and an assessment of potential health impacts resulting.from the
emissions.
As an alternative to performing an air quality impact analysis, an
appropriate air pollution control technology (i.e., carbon absorption,
thermal or catalytic oxidation) can be included in the Remedial Action.
Applying the control technology will eliminate the need to perform an air
quality impact analysis. If the control technology is applied, detailed
information regarding the proposed technology shall be submitted to the MPCA
and EPA for review and approval 30 days following receipt of this letter.
The proposed location of the air stripper shall be changed to minimize
impacts (noise, visibility, emissions). A location on the east side of the
proposed retention pond is more acceptable.
Page 52: Section 6.4 Treated Water Discharge
The proposed sewer line north of Coon Creek shall not be used as a discharge
point since the line is already at capacity. The ROD calls for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge to Coon Creek
following treatment. The ROD specifically discourages a discharge to the
sanitary sewer. The City of Andover, in particular, has opposed the option
of a sanitary sewer disposal. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has
entertained such disposals on a short-term basis only and has discouraged
any long-term disposal to the sanitary sewer. The only capacity in the
area is the sewer line along Hanson Boulevard.
Page 66: Section 7.4.3 Backfill Design
The results from the second phase of the backfill testing shall be submitted
to the MPCA and EPA within 30 days of receipt of this letter. These
results, which were to determine the long-term durability of the selected
design mix, were not included in the RAFD Report.
Page 67: Section 7.5 Groundwater Cut-off Wall Design and Construction
The cut-off wall shall have a minimum thickness of 2 feet and not an
average thickness of 2 feet.
In addition, the proposed backhoe (capable of excavating to depths of 40
feet) or the cut-off wall trench method shall be changed to ensure an
adequate keying depth. Such a change is necessary since a portion of the
proposed excavation will be as deep as 45 feet.
Page 71: Section 7.8 NAPL Monitoring System
The Non-Aqurous Phase Liquid (NAPL) monitoring well NW1B, completed at the
top of the Red Till and proposed for the northwest corner of the slurry wall,
shall be installed midway between boreholes BH-1 and BH-2, since this area
corresponds to the lowest elevations in the Red Till surface.
..
""::;:;"-...,......,.~,l'1"';c'"
;<;.;-~:".~'?~;-
,....
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 5
Page 72: Section 7.9 Operation
NAPL removal actions, evaluation of the material and disposal options shall
be submitted for MPCA and EPA review and approval within 30 days of receipt
of this letter.
Page 73: Section 8.0 Institutional Controls
Detailed recommendations on limiting off-site development and subsurface
development shall be provided in regards to specific activities that may
adversely impact or interfere with the Response Actions. These
recommendations shall be submitted for MPCA and EPA review and approval
within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
Page 78: Section 10.0 Monitoring
The Response Action monitoring network shall include selected private
residential wells. Although such a sampling program need not be identical
to that carried out by Anoka County, it should be equivalent to the County
program. Representatives of the SW-28 Group, Anoka County, City of Andover,
the MPCA, and the EPA should discuss a sampling program prior to developing
a specific sampling plan.
Page 81: Section 10.2 Additional Monitoring
During the first week of operation, the facilities shall be inspected at
least daily and weekly thereafter for three months to ensure the mechanical
facilities are functioning properly. All mechanical equipment shall be
connected to remote monitors (i.e., alarms, warning lights) to alert the
local officials of any mechanical operations. Any mechanical failures will
be repaired within 48 hours.
If there are problems with the integrity or performance of the passive
Response Actions (i.e., cap erosion, swale erosion, monitoring wells, gas
probes, fence), measures shall be taken within one week to rectify
those problems.
If all components of the Response Action are functioning properly, the
inspection schedule can be cut back to biweekly for one year. At that
point, the schedule of inspections shall be reevaluated, based upon one year
of performance history.
Under the requirements of the Resolution of Disputes provision of the Order, the
Respondents have fourteen calendar days from the receipt of this letter and the
approval letter of the EPA to notify the EPA and the MPCA Director of any
modifications/comments the Respondents believe are inconsistent with the Order.
If there are any objections to any comments or modifications, the Respondents,
EPA and MPCA have an additional fourteen calendar days to reconcile differences.
Once you have an opportunity to review the comments and modifications included
in this letter, we believe a meeting would be helpful. We suggest this meeting
include the Respondent's Technical Team members, MPCA and EPA staff and
representatives from the City of Andover and Anoka County.
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 6
If you have any questions regarding these modifications, feel free to contact
Kenneth Haberman (612/296-7399) or Michael Convery (612/296-7353) of the MPCA
staff. Please be advised that EPA will provide comments/modifications regarding
the RAFD Report in a separate letter.
Sincerely,
~ Gerald L. Willet
\)- -Commi ssioner
GLW:ds
~
~
cc: The Honorable Natelie Haas Stephen, Anoka County Commissioner
The Honorable Gerald Winshitl, Mayor of Andover
Margaret Coughlin, Ford Motor Company
Carl Meier, Honeywell, Inc.
Richard Marchek, UNISYS Corporation
Marcia KUll, Bowman & Brooke ,
Kerry Street, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Robert Hutchinson, Anoka County
Jim Schrantz, Andover City Manager
'<!' ,
, ')
'4
.I
.-'
r
Neighbors and residents of Andover:
A group of your neighbors are convinced the time has come for
our city to have it's own police Department.
We want improvements in policing. We want our own Police... Andover
police.
We have contacted some police officers who live in Andover and asked
them to tell us how to start a Police Department. These officers are
going to present our City Council with a "Proposal" to start the
Andover Police Department.
WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT... WE NEED YOUR HELP...
WRITE A LETTER TO THE COUNCIL, TELL THEM NOW IS THE TIME TO START OUR
POLICE DEPARTMENT.
Use the attached letter and lend a hand. With the support of our city
we can have a great police Department.
Committee for a Police Dept.
x ~
ci'J <1)1 ,-J f
J) ,fJ 0
~~v, 0 f{~ ~~
QjJ' (# ci
. {l'cl t\
'/~
...~
~..
Andover City Council
City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, Minn. 55304
Mayor and Councilmen:
The time has come for the city to start it's own
Police Department. Crime is rising and more and
more people are moving into Andover every day. If
you want to attract business to Andover we need a
Police Department.
There are lots of good reasons to have a Police
Department. You have to get one going now before
the costs are too high. Its time our city had it's
own police.
I support your efforts to start a Police Department
in the city of Andover.
Signed:
Andover, Minn. 55304
10
ce.
'~r~g
JfI~ ~entmI !?JaUh y~ ~
DNISION OF DONOVAN COMPANIES. INC.
1080 MONTREAL AVE. . ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA !I !I I 16
July 1, 1988
The Honorable Jerry Windschitl
Mayor of Andover and city council
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Anoka, MN 55303
Dear Mayor Windschitl and Council Members:
Beginning with bills issued on or after July 1, 1988, North
Central Public Service Co. will be decreasing the natural gas
rates in your area. This change is necessary to offset a change
in the wholesale cost of gas we have received from Northern
Natural Gas Company (Northern), our supplier in your service
area.
Northern's rate change reflects the impact of seasonal and
competitive forces in the market demand for gas, as well as
Northern's semi-annual adjustment which incorporates changes in
the cost Northern pays its suppliers for the transportation of
gas. The net result will be a decrease to North Central's Firm
customers. North Central will be decreasing all Firm rates for
natural gas by 4.30 cents per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) effective
with gas usage on and after July 1, 1988. This represents an
approximate decrease of $4.71 annually to the average residential
space heating customer, or expressed as a percentage of decrease,
about (1. 02%) .
If you have any questions concerning these adjustments, we will
be happy to discuss them with yoq.
Very truly yours,
NORTH CENTRAL PUBLIC SERVICE CO.
Division of Iowa Public Service Company
~ N L",~~
Timothy D. Evanson
Rates & Tariffs
TDE/es
'M12'
.
,To
?
TKDA
T.OL TZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1893
612/292.4400
FAX 612/292,0083
J u I Y 14, 1 988
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
Re: HII Is of Bunker Lake
Project 87-2
Kensington Estates
Proj ect 87-8
Andover, Minnesota
Commission Nos. 8806 and 8903
Dear Mayor and Council:
Attached Is a bll I from Halvorsen Construction for curb and gutter removal
and replacement on the above two referenced projects. The curb and gutter
was damaged by builders on the projects driving over the curb before It had
cured to a reasonable strength. The developers and builders were notified
that damages caused by their operations would be corrected at their expense
(see attached letters form TKDA and the City of Andover).
The attached bll ling reflects 227 LF of concrete curb and gutter replaced
on HII Is of Bunker Lake and 70 LF of concrete curb and gutter replaced on
Kensington Estates. At the unit price of $16 per LF for removal and
disposal of existing curb, hand pouring replacement curb and restoration of
disturbed roadway, the bll I reflects $3,632 for HII Is of Bunker Lake and
$1,120 for Kensington Estates. We recommend payment to Halvorsen
Construction In the amount of $4,752, with the cost assessed to each
benefitting project.
JPR:j
Enelosure
r
"'1"""
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (61?L!,5.!?:?1QQ.__,
- a
-, f(.
'cft
~,', :') ,:+ v
September 2, 1987
tf-
,...J
..... ',-
-"-~-'--'~' .
.- ,'t:;
Jerry Windschit1 - Developer
3640 - 152nd Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
~J~:~"--~-._~:~~~~~::~-:i=
~'.::.'._~~.__._'-:_::-":~:.:::~
...::...:-2~,~.-:',_,_--::-_,-_,,- --
"_; MI<t:'~ F~ij. 0 :':';';~i;-~~S~ j;;;'V_
RE: Kensington Estates, Concrete Curbing
, 0 ACCOUNTING 0 LIBRARY
Dear Mr. Windschitl,
The City of Andover is concerned about the possibility of
vehicles driving on recently poured concrete curbs. The
developer, Jerry Windschitl, will be responsible for not allowing
any vehicles to drive on the curbing for (7) seven days after the
time the curb was poured. After said (7) seven days it is '
recommended that the developer bridge over the curb to eliminate
damage to the curb.
Broken or damaged curb will be replaced.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 755-5100.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ANDOVER
/~~~
I
Todd J. Haas
Assistant City Engine r
cc: Jim Schrantz -
John Rodeberg
"
"
I-
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
----..................
t( i'; i
..... f
SEP 4. '87
September 2, 1987
&.c
......,J
Jerry Green - Developer
Hills Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, MN 55303
~::~~'
RE: Hills of Bunker Lake, Concrete Curbing
C Nl.';!: ' i _.-;-~.~~.:~~~;~[
.....9 ACS2~H~T1~ Q WWO"r I
~...-
Dear Mr. Green,
The City of Andover is concerned about the possibility of
vehicles driving on recently poured concrete curbs. The
developer, Jerry Green, will be responsible for not allowing any
vehicles to drive on the curbing for (7) seven days after the
time the curb was poured. After said (7) seven days it is
recommended that the developer bridge over the curb to eliminate
damage to the curb.
Broken or damaged curb will be replaced.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 755-5100.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ANDOVER
144~
Todd J. Haas
Assistant City Enginee
cc: Jim Schrantz -
John Rodebera.
r
TKDA
TOL T2. KING. OUVALl. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUllDtNG
SAINT PAUl. MINNESOTA 55101 1893
612,- 292.4400
FAX 612- 292 .0083
September 14, 1987
Mr. Jerry Green and
Mr . Tony Emmer i ch
c/o Hills, Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Re: Hil Is of Bunker Lake
Project 87-2
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 8806
Gent I emen:
Attached is a letter from Kenko, Inc., regarding potential damage to curb
and gutter. on the above referenced project. We agree that the contractor
is not liable for damages caused by housing contractors, and have discussed
the situation with you on the site and by phone. The City also sent a
fetter to you on September 2, 1987.
We understand that you are under time constraints relating to the Parade of
Homes and house closings and we have tried to respond to al i your requests;
however, the extent of the house construction In the project area prior to
project completion has and wil I create addItional work for the contractor
and for the City. House serv ices and gate val ve boxes have been damaged,
Class 5 aggregate has been contaminated and/or disturbed, curb and gutter
has been driven on too early and potentially damaged, and extra testing has
been done to acce I erate the system's use. We have kept you informed of the
situation and have notified you that additional costs are involved that
wll I be charged against the project.
We wll I continue to cooperate with you to help provide the highest qual ity
project at the earliest possible date. We would appreciate it If you would
notify the housing contractors of our concerns, as it wif I benefit al I of
us to protect the work that has already been completed.
Please contact me at 292-4558 if you have any questions or comments.
P. E.
JPR:j I
cc: James Schrantz, City Engineer
Dave Almgren, Building Inspection
Frank Stone, PublIc Works
I'
KEIIICI lie.
1894 91el Ave. N. E.
Blaine. MN 5S434
Telephone: 61217~510
CONTRACTORS
~ J '87
September 8, 1987
~
,-I
John RodebUrg.~.
Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Assoc., Inc.
2500 American National Bank Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
RE: Hills of Bunker Lake,
Project 87-2, Andover, MN.
Dear John:
.-. .... ~....... \. ,
~._..~.. ''': '::--
- ---
- ,.- ._, 2J
_I; "-. _' . 'J~' .: ;. ;. ~.,'
_ . . -..~.... M-O)
.,~~:::..,l. 0 ...^~y
We note with dismay that builders on this project are driving
over newly poured curb almost as fast as it is placed. Under
the circumstances we mu~t deny any responsiblity for cracked
or broken curbing on the site.
Yours Truly,
KENKO, INC.
'~/j"~/()~ ~
Kaz etley
Estimator
KB/jrm
o
OTATEMENT
HALVORSON CONSTRUCTION
Dave Halvorson
4227 - 165th Avenue N.E.
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55304
~~ /-f,JN',p
(612) 434.78.63
e/fY
0- t Q ^'" .fNJ U fJL
r41t;~1( SE IV E.
r1 -.-.-
TERMS: /-l / 'j ,
..',._,~, ::;.~~,-,"
$ /77';;5,:2 P
" ;'.:;...~ ;;~~~;+$rrB~T~~5;;~j"klI~'~J~~t~
PLEASE DETACH ANO RETURN WITH YOUR REMITTANce
CHARGES
BALANCE FORWARD r>
d~ of (jiUvt~
P//4J;;' 7:
3d fJApS
'Xl:;}
/, S';: 6,..,
HALVORSON CONSTRUCTION
~cy(}W
y ~'
~',i;:-'
. ,~lf;::~l;' :' ":' , ,~;.
. :.:~~. 0;..
:':\ ~.;n~'l; .', .;y.,~ ~.
, .'<i~\~.;'~.,
'~f{" ' ..
;~;"',"
.\ji;':;~\' '.
.....,J
'i3~,.:}~i~/
..>:. .r::
. ,?,~i.'.':'
,
,.';'"
.j.:
'~,.;,,:
'/.~.: i . .
I
i
.? ,.1..<,00 i
i
I
I,
,.
"
~.
//:20, () 0 ,
7/. J.. 'J-
~.
1/3.2.5 2.~i.
'I ' i
0.
PAY LAST AMOUNT
IN THIS COLUMN
.;~ .
'. ;"'~rj:
~: '
..') ','-:'-.
.. '~,.
:t\;
"/>
'.,
'r"'
~'i,
.-',
. ~':
i:'
",J.
'{. 'IF
~
il
:~/~'}:n':
,;',~:'-'~;;;:::~
-ir: ;;iJI"
l'~~t
[t
~ .,
'-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
CITY of ANDOVER
CT'I'Y COllNC'TT,
RAY SaWADA
JULY 15. 1988
ANDOVER FIREWORKS DISPLAY
This is the regulations or laws on giving a
Fireworks Display.
Debbie, the coordinator of the fireworks display,
has,also been given a copy of these regulations.
It will be up to your decision if you want to follow
the regulations or not.
If you have any questions, please contact me at
city Hall.
\
\ <
REGULATIONS ABOUT FIREWORKS
ARTICLE 78
FIREWORKS
BOND FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY REQUIRED
Sec. 78.103. The permittee shall furnish a bond or
certificate of insurance in an amount deemed adequate by the
chief for the payment of all damages which may be caused
either to a person or persons or to property be reason of the
permitted display and arising from any acts of the permittee,
his agents, employees or subcontractors.
APPENDIX C
SUGGESTED REGULATIONS OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL FOR THE PUBLIC
DISPLAY OF FIREWORKS APPLICATION FOR PERMITS
1. Application for permit to operate a display of fireworks
in conformance with the terms of .......... of the General
Laws of .......... shall be made in writing on forms
provided by the State Fire Marshal to the chief of the
fire department of the city, own or municipality in or
near which the display is to be held.
2. Such application shall set forth:
a. The name of the organization sponsoring the display
together with the names of persons actually in charge
of the firing of the display.
b. Evidence of financial responsibility.
c. The date and time of day at which the display is to be
held.
\ . .,
.
3. Upon receipt of such application at least 15 days in
advance of the date set for this display, the Chief of the
Fire Department shall make, or cause to be made, an
investigation of the site of the proposed display for the
purpose of determining whether the provisions of these
regulations are complied with in the case of the
particular display. He shall confer with the Chief of the
police Department about the application and whether
issuance of a permit would be consistent with public
safety. Being satisfied that the display is properly
lawful, the Chiefs of the police and Fire Departments
shall together endorse the application, stating that they
approve the display as being in conformance with all parts
of the law and with these regulations. Failure to approve
the application by either the Fire Chief or police Chief
shall be sufficient cause for the state Fire Marshal to
deny permit.
4. The application, following endorsement by the Chiefs of
the Fire and police Department, shall be sent to the state
Fire Marshal who shall then, upon receipt of evidence of
financial responsibility as required by law in such cases,
issue a nontransferable permit authorizing. '
JAMES P. LAR1':IN
ROBERT L. HOF"F"MAN
JACK 1'". CALY
O. KENNETH LINDGREN
ANDREW W. DANIELSON
WENDELL R. ANDERSON
GERALD H. F'RIEDELL
ROBERT B. WHITLOCK
ALLAN E. MULLIGAN
ROBERT J. HENt-'ESSEY
JAMES C. ERICKSON
EDWARD J. DRISCOLL
JAMES P. MILEY
GEt-'E N. F'ULLER
DAVID C. SELLEROREN
RICHARD,J. KEENAN
JOHN D. F'ULLME:R
ROBERT E. BOYLE:
F'RANK I. HARVE:Y
RICHARD A. F'ORSCHLER
CHARLES S. MODELL
CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN
JOHN R. BEATTIE
LINDA H. F'ISHER
THOMAS P. STOLTMAN
STEVEN G. LEVIt-'
F'ORREST D. NOWLIN
MICHAEL C. JACKMAt-'
JOHN E. DIEHL
JON S. SWIERZEW5KI
THOMAS ..I. F'LYNN
JAMES P. QUINN
TODD I. F'REEMAN
STEPHEN B. SOLOMDN
PETER K. BECK
JEROME H. KAHNKE
SHERRILL OMAN KURETICH
GERALD L. SECK
JOHN B. LUNDQUIST
DAYLE NOLAN
THOMAS B. HUMPHREY, .JR.
J;
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431
TELEPHONE 16121 835-3800
TELECOPIER 16121835-5102
2000 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER
222 SOUTH NINTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE 16121 338-6610
TELECOPIER [6121 338.1002
NORTH SUBURBAN OFFICE
8990 SPRINGBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250
COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433
TELEPHONE 16121 786-7117
TELECOPIER 16121 786-6711
July 13, 1988
Mr. Bill ottensmann
City Engineer
City of Coon Rapids
1313 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
and
,', ~"A r," l R'" ''''''0
'14 '. J~' ~ ~ l}z t\ \~, t."
~G~~~;9~~-l
CITY OF 1\t'JDOVER
Mr. James Schrantz
City Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Bill and Jim:
cc.
OAv:/!/Jl:l&/
F'RANCIS E. GIBERSON
MICHAEL T. McKIM
CHARLES R. WEAVER
HERMAN L.TALLE
WILLIAM S. BRANDT
VINCENT G. ELLA
TRACY R. EICHHORN-HICKS
ANDREW ..I MITCHELL
JOHN A. COTTER"
BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILER
PAUL B. PLUNKETT
AMY OARR GRADY
ALAN L. KI LOOW
KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN
CATHERINE BARNETT WILSON"
JEF'FREY C. ANDERSON
DANIEL L. BOWLES
TODD M. VLATKOVICH
TIMOTHY ..I. MeMANUS
JILL I. F'RIEDERS
GREGORY E. KORSTAD
CRAIG A. PETERSON
LISA A. GRAY
GARY A. RENNEKE
THOMAS H. WEAVER
SHANNON K. MeCAMBRIDGE:
MICHAEL S. COHEN
DENISE: M. NORTON
GARY A. VAN CLEVE
MICHAEL B. BRAMAN
JOSEPH W. DICKER
JACQUELINE F'. DIETZ
GAYLEN L. KNACK
ROONEV D. IVES
JULIE A. WRASE
CHRISTOPHER ..I. HARRISTHAL
RONALD M. STARK, JR.
SHARON L. BRENNA
MARIKAY CANAGA LITZAU
OF' COUNSEL
JOSEPH GITlS
.JOHN A. McHUGH
RICHARD A. NORDBYE
MLSO ADMITTED IN
WISCONSIN
This report is to
landfill selection
Anoka County.
bring you
process
up-to-date on the
which is currently
progress of the
proceeding in
a great deal of activity in the
last session which we were very
had the Merriam/Nelson Bill passed, it
the landfill siting process established
by the Metro Council. The Bill involved was the Annual Waste
Management Act Amendments and in the Senate was authored by
As you know there
legislature during
concerned with since
would have eliminated
was
the
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN. LTD.
Mr. Bill Ottensmann and
Mr. James Schrantz
July 13, 1988
Page 2
Senator Merriam (Senate File No. 1891) and in the House was
authored by Representative Darby Nelson (House File No. 2031)
The fact that the provisions regarding the landfill siting
process got as far as they did certainly was largely due to the
authors of the Bill. Both Senator Merriam and Representative
Nelson are held in extremely high regard relative to pollution
control issues and as a practical matter, have been the people
who have demonstrated more concern for the environment than
anyone else in their respective bodies in my opinion. Although
certainly both authors had a parochial interest, I am sure that
people were aware that there were good reasons why the current
landfill siting process is not necessary at this point in time.
The Metro Council which, of course, established the siting
process and as I earlier mentioned, involved in its
implementation, was not aggressive at least in the early stages
of the session, although they did come out against the
amendments toward the end. The Bill was strongly supported by
a number of the landfill and waste disposal interests which
were generally looked on as parochial by the legislators and
probably did not have too great an impact. You will recall
during the session a hearing was held where Darby was accused
by some environmentalists of being a tool of BFI and Waste
Management because of his sponsorship of the Bill. Obviously,
the reaction to this testimony was extremely hostile and in my
opinion, worked for the Bill more than against it.
One of the issues which was very much involved at least by
perception was the question of the two expansions which are now
being proposed at Flying Cloud by BPI and Ramsey by Waste
Management. There was a genuine concern that if in fact the
process were terminated and no future landfills were built,
this would create an absolute monopoly for these two companies
in the landfill business, particularly BFI. I think there is a
general recognition also that the elimination of landfilling by
1990 is going to be extremely difficult to achieve and we
probably will need additional landfill space in the fairly near
future. Our efforts during the legislative session obviously
were to promote the passage of the legislation, but
unfortunately the House was not willing to go along with the
Senate provisions and the Merriam amendments were not adopted
in Conference Committee. We are specifically talking about
Section 33 of the Senate Bill. This section repealed among
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN. LTD.
Mr. Bill Ottensmann and
Mr. James Schrantz
July 13, 1988
Page 3
other things, Section 473.149, Subd. 2B, 473.803, Subd. lA, and
473.806 and 473.833. These amendments taken together
completely eliminate the siting process under the Waste
Management Act. It would be my expectation that the Bill will
be introduced again in the '89 session, and I think that lt is
very important that we do whatever we can to see that it
reaches final passage.
I have also attempted to keep in touch with the County,
representatives, and also the Metro Council. I have had
several conversations with Bob Nethercut who is now the head of
the Solid Waste Department for the Council and he has kept me
up-to-date on what the Council is doing. It should be
mentioned also that certainly the whole area of waste
management will again be one of the top legislative items on
the Metro Council's agenda. This week I have talked to Bob
again as to the funding for the second phase of EIS, and he has
indicated to me that the Council has not received a request for
the funding for the second phase. As I understand it, they
have had a number of discussions with the County and it is
possible that they may still have funds remaining from the
first phase, although he had expected the request for
additional funding sometime ago. I have also had an indication
that the preliminary draft of the socioeconomic part of EIS was
completed and as you know Bill, I have asked you to see if it
was possible to get a copy of that and I gather nothing is
available at this time. However, I do think we should continue
to push for it.
Obviously, a very important issue in the whole siting process
is the current capacity and the current estimated capacity of
our current landfills. The Metro Council is in the process of
coming up with a new report relative to what will be available
and Bob Nethercut has indicated that this report will be ready
sometime before the Legislative Session in 1989. It is my
intention to keep track of that report as it has developed and
certainly will keep you informed of their progress. It seems
to me that we really are at a very crucial time now with the
construction of the Hennepin County and Anoka County facilities
which should be going on line in the near future and also the
efforts by the various communities and the State to implement
LARKIN, HOI"FMAN. DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
Mr. Bill Ottensmann and
Mr. James Schrantz
July 13, 1988
Page 4
their various source reduction programs.
Metro Council completes their report, it
decrease in the need for future landfill
Hopefully when the
will indicate a
sites.
Very truly yours,
/'j A
L/l~----'
Charles R. Weaver, for
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd.
CRW:tS/ABO
P.S. Judd Ebersviller is working on several questions that
have been raised including the drilling, but he cannot
advise on these until additional information is made
available. I have also enclosed a copy of the summary of
the Waste Management Act amendments and please give me a
call if you have any questions.
CRW
r7"HOUSE
RESEARCH
Bill Summary
S.F.
I
H.F.
SUBJECT:
Waste Management Act Amendments
AUTHORS: ' Nelson, D.
COMMITTEE: Legislative Commission on Waste Management DATE: 2-1-88
This bill is a collection of amendments to the Waste Management Act. Generally it removes the
requirement of separation by a waste generator or during collection in the defmition of recyclable
materials; clarifies the duties of the Legislative Commission on Waste Management; broadens some loan
and grant programs of the Waste Management Board, ratifies the transfer by the Governor of waste tire
and used oil management and grant and loan programs to the Waste Management Board and expands the
waste tire programs; deletes the cap on the fee metropolitan counties may place on disposal of solid
waste; allows the Pollution Control Agency to recover its costs of determining hazardous substance
information for individual parcels of real property; requires tire retailers to accept waste tires; amends
earlier appropriations to reflect grant and loan program changes; cancels a planned transfer of money
from the Motor Vehicle Transfer Fund to the General Fund; appropriates money to the Board and
Agency; and repeals the sunset of the Legislative Commission on Waste Management.
Section-by-Section Summary
Section 1. Recyclable Materials Definition. Removes the separation "by the generator or during
collection" language from the definition of "recyclable materials" for chapter USA.
Section 2. Lelrislative Commission on Waste Manal!ement. Clarifies the duties of the legislative
commission on waste management.
Sections 3-5. Hazardous Waste ProcessinlJ: and Facilities Grants. Amends the Waste Management ~oard's
authority to make grants for hazardous waste processing and facilities feasibility studies by making
feasibility studies of containment of waste also eligible for grants.
Section 6. Waste Processing Facility Loans. Amends the Agriculture and Economic Development
Authority's loan program for hazardous waste processing facilities to make industrial waste facilities also
eligible for loans.
Section 7. Hazardous Waste Grant and Loan PrOl!Tams Reoort. Amends the requirement for the Waste
Management Board to evaluate and report to the LCWM on its hazardous waste grant and loan programs
by requiring that the report be made biennially.
Section 8. Market and Facility Development Grants for Recvclable Materials. Amends the Waste
Management Board's grant program for market and facility development for recyclable materials by
making market and facility development for compost also eligible for grants.
Legislative Analyst:
Linda S. Taylor, 2%-8961
Research Department. Minnesota House of Representatives. 600 State Office Building
Bill Summary -
February 1, 1988
Page 2
Section 9. Waste Tire Mana~ement. Amends the waste tire program by broadening its scope, clarifying
which agency is responsible for the program and by adding authority for the Waste Management Board 10
contract with counties for abatement of waste tire nuisances.
Section 10. Waste Tire Loans and Grants. Creates a new section to:
(a) place the waste tire loan and grant program that was formerly administered by the Economic
Development Authority under the Waste Management Board;
(b) expand the grant program to cover market development for tire derived products;
(c) allow grants to local government for waste tire collection and transportation;
(d) authorize the Board to conduct feasibility studies of uses of waste tires and public education
on proper waste tire management; and
(e) require an annual report by the Board to the LCWM on waste tire management.
Section 11. Land Disoosal of Used Oil. Prohibits placement of used oil in or on the land, unless
approved by the Pollution Control Agency.
Section 12. Used Oil Loans and Grants. Transfers authority to make loans and grants for used oil
processing and storage tanks to the Waste Management Board from the Economic Development Authority.
Section 13. County Fee on Solid Waste. Deletes the 25 cents per cubic yard limit on the fee a
metropolitan county may charge on disposal of mixed municipal solid waste.
Section 14. Environmental Ouality Board. Adds the chair of the ,waste management board to membership
on the Environmental Quality Board.
Section 15. Cost Recovery for Real Property Reviews. Authorizes the Pollution Control Agency to
recover its cost from requesters of determining whether a parcel of real property contains hazardous
substance and the status of any related agency actions.
Section 16. Waste Tires Collection. Requires tire retailers to accept waste tires from each customer in
a number equal to the number sold to the customer.
Section 17. Approoriations - Market Development for Recyclables. Amends the 1987 appropriation to hc
Waste Management Board for market development for recyclables by removing "recyclables" thereby
allowing the money to be spent for market development for both recyclables and compost.
Section 18. Appropriation - Waste Tires. Amends the 1987 appropriation for cleanup of waste tire
dumps to make the money available for the broader waste tire programs in sections 9 and 10.
Section 19. Cancellation of Money Transfer. Cancels the July 1, 1988, transfer of $2,925,200 from the
Motor Vehicle Transfer Fund to the General Fund.
Section 20. Use of Hazardous Waste Site Acquisition Bond Monev. Amends the appropriation to the
Waste Management Board of bond money for acquisition of a hazardous waste facility site to delete the
amount specified for staff and other costs related to selection and acquisition of the site.
.
'..
Bill Summary -
February 1, 1988
Page 3
Section 21. Appropriations.
Subdivision 1. Appropriates $2,200,200 for Waste Tire Management and $525,000 for used oil loans
and grants from the Motor Vehicle Transfer Fund to the Waste Management Board. Increases the
complement of the Board by 6 persons.
Subdivision 2. Appropriates $238,500 to the Pollution Control Agency from the Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Compliance Fund for startup costs for the Agency's cost recovery system In
Section 15. This appropriation must be repaid to the Fund through the cost recovery system. The
complement of the agency is increased by 6 positions, 2 of which are temporary.
Section 22. Reoealer. Repeals:
Section 115A.14, subdivision 5 - Requires the Legislative Commission on Waste Management to
complete a resource recovery facility study by January 1, 1982.
Section 115A.14, subdivision 6 - June 30, 1992 expiration date for LCWM
Section 115A.90, subdivision 4 - Defmition of "commissioner" for the Waste Tire Program that has
been transferred from Energy and Economic Development to the Waste Management Board.
Section 116.55 - Waste Tire Recycling Loans and Grants - moved from the Pollution Control Agency
to the Board.
Section 116M.07, subdivision 14 - Used Oil Loans and Grants - moved from the Economic
Development Authority to the Board.
Section 23. Effective Date. Sections 9, 10, 15, 18, 19 and 21 are effective the day following
enactment.
.... ~ ,....
.
/8
ce,
7/lo/7cV
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
July 14, 1988
. R"" i:-(.;'l:'-f~/-.i: 0' ..
I~~ ~l} ~.~ ~ t l~.~
,1'\" r."-,...'--'-~,..,.~.._..'--l,.. .
.. ,< J U LIto' !f1na '
l' ", .J ..)~) r
~- ---...----~..-
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Conestoga Rovers & Associates, Ltd.
651 Colby Drive
Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1C2
CANADA
CITY OF ANDOVER
Dear Mr. Van Norman:
Re: Waste Disposal Engineering Site Response Action Final Design Report
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has completed the review of
the Response Action Final Design (RAFD) Report dated June 6, 1988, and your
June 11, 1988, letter regarding the revised landfill cap selection. These
submittals for the Waste Disposal Engineering Site (Site) in Andover, Minnesota,
were made pursuant to Task E of Section VI of Exhibits A and B to the Response
Order by Consent (Order) dated March 27, 1984. Pursuant to Part VII of the
Order, the MPCA staff approves the RAFD Report with the following modifications
included:
Page 7: Section 3.1 Basis of the Design
Waste extending beyond the existing property boundaries, between the east
definition of the landfill and Hanson Boulevard, shall be moved to the
interior of the landfill in order to properly install the cap. Based on
discussions with representatives of the City of Andover and Anoka County,
utility work during the past spring confirmed the presence of waste to
Hanson Boulevard. This finding goes along with earlier reports that waste
was removed during the construction of Hanson Boulevard.
Page 8: Section 3.2 Contour Design
The existing wetland area southwest of the Site (west of well nest W-23)
shall be utilized to receive additional surface water runoff from the cap.
In allowing more of the landfill surface runoff to flow towards this
wetland, the need to build the slope on the southwestern corner of the cap
will be reduced and the size of the proposed retention pond (northwest of
the landfill) will also be reduced. The slope reduction on the
southwestern corner of the cap will also minimize visual impacts to the
residential areas south and southwest of the Site.
Phone:
520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Regional Ollices . Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 2
In aooltlon, any wastes excavated during the installation of the cut-off
wall shall be incorporated into the fill and completely covered by the cap.
Page 10: Section 3.3 Surface Water Drainage
Swales shall be added along the western and southern boundaries (western
half) of the cap to reduce the impact on adjacent properties from cap
runoff. The swales will allow surface water to flow towards the wetland
southwest of well nest W-23 and along the eastern northeastern boundaries of
the cap and will discharge to a retention pond northeast of the Site.
The size of the proposed retention pond northeast of the landfill shall be
reduced to maintain an adequate buffer for the residences along Crosstown
Boulevard. In addition, as indicated above, plans for a retention pond
northeast of the landfill shall be developed to handle the runoff from the
northeastern portion of the cap. The cap contours may have to be redesigned
to direct more runoff to the northeastern retention pond and existing
southwestern wetlands in order to enable a reduction in the size of the
northwestern wetland. Plans 2 and 3 shall be modified to reflect these
requirements. Furthermore, additional detailed information is needed to
demonstrate that the retention pond(s} will be adequate. Such information,
which includes hydraulic capacity of ponds, lOG-year storm flow, and
residence time of ponds, shall be submitted to the MPCA and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with 30 days following the receipt of
thi s 1 etter.
MPCA staff recognizes the fact that part of the northeast property is
privately owned. The possibility of exchanging the Waste Disposal
Engineering property north of Coon Creek for the private property south of
Coon Creek is bei ng acti ve ly pursued. The fact that thi s pri vate property
is effecti ve ly i so 1 ated for a 11 practi ca 1 purposes may make such an exchange
attractive. It will also eliminate the need to reduce the wastes in Area 3,
as noted on Plan 2.
Pages 12-15: Sections 4.0 - 4.2 Landfill Cap - Component Design
The substitutions of the 2-foot clay low-permeability layer for the
originally proposed lime sludge (as detailed in the June 11, 1988, Addendum)
is acceptable. The performance history of a clay-layer is better
established than the lime sludge.
Page 26: Section 4.3 Sand Drainage Layer
A 12-inch drainage layer as originally proposed in the RAFD Report shall be
required to ensure adequate drainage above the clay layer in conformance
with the Resource Conservation Recovery Act Technical Performance Standards
and consistent with the Record of Decision (ROD). The proposal in the
June 11, 1988, Addendum is not acceptable.
-- --.--------------
- -
.J""Jo
..
J~~~W1~~~~ ~~aY'i0~!
~
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 3
~..
~
.'~
Page 29: Section 4.5 Common Fill Layer
Prior to placement, the material for the common fill layer shall be tested
to ensure compliance with Anoka County requirements. A testing proposal
shall be developed and submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval
within 30 days following receipt of this letter. As part of this review,
Anoka County comments will be incorporated in the approval of the testing
proposal.
Page 30: Section 4.6 Topsoil
Prior to placement, the material for the topsoil layer shall be tested to
ensure compliance with the Anoka County requirements. A testing proposal
shall be developed and submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval
within 30 days following receipt of this letter. As part of this review,
Anoka County comments will be incorporated in the approval of the testing
proposal.
Page 39: Section 5.2 Extraction Well System Design
Monitoring of the Upper Sand below the gray silt shall be required in order
to ensure that the extraction system is performing adequately and
effectively in preventing off-site contaminant movement. The proposal for
the installation of eight extraction wells in the upper part of the Upper
Sand aquifer is acceptable.
Page 43: Section 6.2.1 Extraction Well Design
The extraction wells shall meet the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH)
requirements. The proposed single check value at the force main connection
(Figure 6.1) may not be acceptable to the MDH.
Page 48: Section 6.3 Groundwater Treatment System
The following details, regarding the treatment system, shall be submitted
within 30 days of receipt of this letter for review and approval by the MPCA
and EPA:
(1) tower dimensions (height and diameter)
(2) air-flow rates
(3) blower rates
(4) packer medium
(5) plumbing design for tower assembly
(6) description of pre-treatment with carbon or vapor phase carbon
treatment
(7) description of operation and maintenance requirements.
This information is required to properly evaluate the effectiveness and the
potential impacts of an air stripper assembly.
..,.'
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 4
In addition, an air quality impact analysis shall be conducted and the
results submitted to tne MPCA and EPA for review and approval. The analysis
shall include a determination of property line air concentrations of each
pollutant using either dispersion modeling or actual measurements (if
available) and an assessment of potential health impacts resulting 'from the
emissions.
As an alternative to performing an air quality impact analysis, an
appropriate air pollution control technology (i.e., carbon absorption,
thermal or catalytic oxidation) can be included in the Remedial Action.
Applying the control technology will eliminate the need to perform an air
quality impact analysis. If the control technology is applied, detailed
information regarding the proposed technology shall be submitted to the MPCA
and EPA for review and approval 30 days following receipt of this letter.
The proposed location of the air stripper shall be changed to minimize
impacts (noise, visibility, emissions). A location on the east side of the
proposed retention pond is more acceptable.
Page 52: Section 6.4 Treated Water Discharge
The proposed sewer line north of Coon Creek shall not be used as a discharge
point since the line is already at capacity. The ROD calls for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge to Coon Creek
following treatment. The ROD specifically discourages a discharge to the
sanitary sewer. The City of Andover, in particular, has opposed the option
of a sanitary sewer disposal. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has
entertained such disposals on a short-term basis only and has discouraged
any long-term disposal to the sanitary sewer. The only capacity in the
area is the sewer line along Hanson Boulevard.
Page 66: Section 7.4.3 Backfill Design
The results from the second phase of the backfill testing shall be submitted
to the MPCA and EPA within 30 days of receipt of this letter. These
results, which were to determine the long-term durability of the selected
design mix, were not included in the RAFD Report.
Page 67: Section 7.5 Groundwater Cut-off Wall Design and Construction
The cut-off wall shall have a minimum thickness of 2 feet and not an
average thickness of 2 feet.
In addition, the proposed backhoe (capable of excavating to depths of 40
feet) or the cut-off wall trench method shall be changed to ensure an
adequate keying depth. Such a change is necessary since a portion of the
proposed excavation will be as deep as 45 feet.
Page 71: Section 7.8 NAPL Monitoring System
The Non-Aqurous Phase Liquid (NAPL) monitoring well NW1B, completed at the
top of the Red Till and proposed for the northwest corner of the slurry wall,
shall be installed midway between boreholes BH-1 and BH-2, since this area,
corresponds to the lowest elevations in the Red Till surface.
'~:~>i~;t:_:;: ,:~~{,:~:;::,-, " \,.~.,.f;~4V"f:~':;l.:~:,;
.....<...
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 5
Page 72: Section 7.9 Operation
NAPL removal actions, evaluation of the material and disposal options shall
be submitted for MPCA and EPA review and approval within 30 days of receipt
of this letter.
Page 73: Section 8.0 Institutional Controls
Detailed recommendations on limiting off-site development and subsurface
development shall be provided in regards to specific activities that may
adversely impact or interfere with the Response Actions. These
recommendations shall be submitted for MPCA and EPA review and approval
within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
Page 78: Section 10.0 Monitoring
The Response Action monitoring network shall include selected private
residential wells. Although such a sampling program need not be identical
to that carried out by Anoka County, it should be equivalent to the County
program. Representatives of the SW-28 Group, Anoka County, City of Andover,
the MPCA, and the EPA should discuss a sampling program prior to developing
a specific sampling plan.
Page 81: Section 10.2 Additional Monitoring
During the first week of operation, the facilities shall be inspected at
least daily and weekly thereafter for three months to ensure the mechanical
facilities are functioning properly. All mechanical equipment shall be
connected to remote monitors (i;e., alarms, warning lights) to alert the
local officials of any mechanical operations. Any mechanical failures will
be repaired within 48 hours.
If there are problems with the integrity or performance of the passive
Response Actions (i.e., cap erosion, swale erosion, monitoring wells, gas
probes, fence), measures shall be taken within one week to rectify
those problems.
If all components of the Response Action are functioning properly, the
inspection schedule can be cut back to biweekly for one year. At that
point, the schedule of inspections shall be reevaluated, based upon one year
of performance history.
Under the requirements of the Resolution of Disputes provision of the Order, the
Respondents have fourteen calendar days from the receipt of this letter and the
approval letter of the EPA to notify the EPA and the MPCADirector of any
modifications/comments the Respondents believe are inconsistent with the Order.
If there are any objections to any comments or modifications, the Respondents,
EPA and MPCA have an additional fourteen calendar days to reconcile differences.
Once you have an opportunity to review the comments and modifications included
in this letter, we believe a meeting would be helpful. We suggest this meeting
include the Respondent's Technical Team members, MPCA and EPA staff and
representatives from the City of Andover and Anoka County.
....>-~
Mr. Alan Van Norman
Page 6
If you have any questions regarding these modifications, feel free to contact
Kenneth Haberman (612/296-7399) or Michael Convery (612/296-7353) of the MPCA
staff. Please be advised that EPA will provide comments/modifications regarding
the RAFD Report in a separate letter.
Sincerely,
~
~
~._ Gerald L. Willet
\)- -Commi ss i oner
GLW:ds
cc: The Honorable Natelie Haas Stephen, Anoka County Commissioner
The Honorable Gerald Winshitl, Mayor of Andover
Margaret Coughlin, Ford Motor Company
Carl Meier, Honeywell, Inc.
Richard Marchek, UNISYS Corporation
Marcia Kull, Bowman & Brooke
Kerry Street, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Robert Hutchinson, Anoka County
,Jim Schrantz, Andover City Manager
---
A
~
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, Sl. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 222-8423
July 13, 1988
~"~-'I.,;;"('. -to ., ~ R'. '...~ 0'"
; "'. ;. -," ':\ i:~" n", -.' .
'" ", .'f " .
. ,; I'" '. ~~ ~~ .. "J
.~... \.,"' .....,.. \, t.;</;1'J
Rr~:~;;~~l
~, .----..........,...
To All City Managers:
CITY OF ANDOVER
(0 cc,
I~ ,."::)
DIfV'IF
yn!gg
This letter is to remind you that the SAC refund program is still
available to the communities during the remainder of 19~8 and 1989.
Please inform the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, by City
Council Resolution, as to your community's decision regarding par-
ticipation in this program.
Under the refund procedure you are to submit your entire list of eli-
gible permits for a SAC refund providing the following information:
the permit number and date it was issued~ location and type of
building~ number of SAC units and amount paid~ and the date it was
reported to the Commission. This list should b~ accompanied by your
City Council Resolution and a map designating those areas for which
you desire to receive a refund.
There may be some communities who do not have any eligible units
(on-site systems for which SAC had been previously collected). In
these cases a written communication from the community indicating that
no SAC refund is requested should be submitted to the Commission.
If you have any questions, please contact either Mr. Ray Odde or Mr.
Donald Bluhm of the Planning Department at 229-2114. Your cooperation
is appreciated.
Sincer~
Peter E. Meintsma
Chairman
.
~
PEM: SLS: loc
cc: MWCC Commissioner
J. J. Hiniker, Deputy Administrator
Planning File: 19.775
/""" u'
. .~~~"" ~'~~ ; ~
~..~,..I ;f:\.;:' \i .~: ~).~ ..:~
r; "I) t, ~ (~.~.'. ,~~
-2-
'1fQV"aber 28, 1972
I ' ,
cfte before thea on 'their agenda and to make reco..enc1&'tions to Town Board
of Supervisors. He contended that the Town Board of Supervisors can either
accept recoJlllendation, reject, or send back fer reatudy. He ala. noted that
tbose interested should attend meeting in two weeks for the final outcome.
Lyle, Bradley noted tha't if' the ma'tter is called up again" the use .f an over-
bead transparency would enable 'the audienoe to lIee easier. The lIotion ....
carried una.niaously.
, The proposed Public Hearing on Backaan addition was .called again and
they" were not present.
A't 9105, a Public Hearing followed to consider an,8lIlendaent to zoning
Ordinance 8, sec'tiOQ 3.02, subsection E, subparagraph 2, Cha1rmanJaworski
opened tbis !'tea up to general discussion by the audience. Dick Schneider
stated that if the wording of O:rd1nance 8 was changed, it would require 5
acres to own a horae and be felt this would be unfair. Holaaek asked
Schneider if he had any alternatives, Schneider thought they abould adept
ordinance to control horses. Jones asked 1f' anyone had seen a lIodel of
such. Schneider said that Hall Lake has sucb an ordinanoe, Jones ude a
lIotion tbe Town Board .f Supervisors rejeot ohange in woming of Ordinance 8
as a way to control horses and to look into a herse ordinance to control the..
Holasek seconded the aotion. There was further discussion on the u.tter.
Lyle Bradley stated that as a aeaber of Town Boam, he has received no cOlllplaints
en tbis matter. Schneider stated that when he was a aellber of, the boam he
did receive several complaints on 2 acre lota. At 9.25 the lIotion was carried
J1n&nimously.
At 9130 WilliaJ1 Born was called fGr reviewal of possible subdivision
Iff lot in track C at approx1u.te1y County Road 7 be'tween.17Jrd" and 175th Avenue.
WilliaDa Born was represented by bis father, Lloyd E. Born,and Jeff earson,
a,aeaber of Legal Aid Society, earson asked for perait to sell unplatted
piece, of land shewn in T.rack C because of severe ham.bip en, the part of
Williaa Born. He stated Born did not want to aell, but because of an urgent
need of funds it was neceasary. Jones stated that under platting Ordinance 10
the hardship clause pertains to the land only and that it is against state
law to sell any land under 5 acres by aeets andbounda. . Lloyd; Born said that
his son has a bupr fer one lot nw and that if' he oannot sell. be will have
to go 'on welfaro. Johnsen stated that tho way present ordinance is werded
he would natly turn tho dew. Jon.. asked if they oeuld not. possibly be
interpreting tbe wording wrong. Jones stated be tbought .itwould be fair to
have attorney look at _otter te interpret hardship olauso. HoweIt agreed.
Chairllian Jaworski told Carson t.. oontact township attorney if ho wanted an
interpretation of hamsbip clause at his 81fD C8Illt before, township aeeting.
He also suggested he call Marv Christensen ef the T01fn Beard.
At 10115 P.M. clRltinued Public Hearing fer BacImaa was again called
and was not there. '
At 10115 Public Hearing was called fer CliffltX'd Chapman--rezoning B-1
to R-3. The west t of N.V. t of the S.V. t of section 15, T8lIDShip 32,
Range 24 in Anoka ,County, Minneseta. Cha1raan Jaworski stated the rea.son
Chapman is requestins rezoning i. becauso his lots do, not .eet 60% of the
requirements of. Ol:dinance 8. Bolasek asIted Chapu.n if be had deeds filed
-)-
Nevember 28, 1972
I
on eaoh 10't;. Chapu.n atated be bad dene .. en Dece.ber 31, 1970. ~1aaek
allSG stated t.hat in erder t.o .en 60% requlreaent under R-1 hi. lots weuld
have te be apprex1Mtely 1 2/) acr... He1aaek..id that 1t it was resened
to R-) withCJut a stipulation Chapaan ceu1d build en eveX'J let. Cha~n
said he intended to build OIl eve'r7 lot. At 10lJ5 Jehu_ ud.e' a .ot1en te
change to R-J with stipulatiOft he weul4 be able te bul14 all en "'fIX'J ether
lot. Seoended by Holasek. D1acuaden tell_ed wlth Cha)lUA .,ins thi. was
J1II&cceptable. Johns_ requ..terl Jft'II1sdea te 1f1thcb:aw his .ft1ftn. Hela.ek
netes because it ... seconded it. cannet be withdrawn. A y........ put _ the
motion--2 tor, 4 against. Moti_ net carrled. Clenden1ll8 11&4. a ....1_ t.
leave ,lWa &8 R-1 olaas1ficaUen. Secended by Jebne_. :Ch&1raan Jawerak1
noted"Chapu.n'. reason te c-in8 was a cbaap te R-J. 'lbe vete 11&11 2 tor,
2 against, 1 abstention by Dutte. Ch&1raan JaweraId veted te bre&Ic tie,
whioh made it J agaiDst, leaving it &8 R-1. At this peint Chapaan backed
up and sald he would accept plu JUt terth that he would, be able te build
en l!Nery ether lot enly. ~lasek .tat.ed. he wanted. lets te be .. d_1sn&ted
&8 to which enea Cha]lll&ft oeu1d bulld n. Jon.. 1II&d. a .ot1en te reo_ern
that Town Beam et Supervisors accept r..enlng te R-J with stipulation
that only 1!NeJ:y .ther let is bu1ldable. Dutton .ecended.' Only lots B, D,
F, H,J, K, L, N, P, R, T, & V shall be desi8o&ted &8 buildable. It is nGted
that this infctrJla.t1on sheuld be available to the building inspechr. The
vote wa.a 4: far and 1 against.
Meeting was adjourned at 10.55.
.
Mary Kegler, Clerk
Planning and Zoning CGIIIlissien
~
i~
MEMORANDUM
To:
Bill Hawkins, City Attorney
From:
d'Arcy Bosell
In Re:
Declare Adequacy of Petition/Uplander
Agenda Item No. 7c
Date:
7 June 1988
Bill:
In November of 1970, the Zoning & Planning Commission of Grow
Township approved a subdivision for Clifford Chapman with the
caveat that h. could build on every other lot. According to the
minutes of the Z & P dated November 14, 1972, no action was ever
taken by the Town Board of any kind. The Z & P recommended that
Mr. Chapman apply for a rezoning as his request came in after the
adoption of the Platting and Zoning Ordinances and that request
went before th~ Z & ~ on November 28, 1972.
At that meeting the motion was made to "change to R3 with the
stipulation he would be able to build only on every other lot."
There was considerable discussion apparent in which Mr. Chapman
withdrew his request, then remade his request and the Z & P voted
in favor on a 4 to 1 vote. The stipulation was that only lots B,
0, F, H, J, K, L, N, P, R, T, and V shall be buildable.
At the Town Board meeting of December 12, 1972, the rezoning was
brought to them by Clifford Chapman. The City Attorney
recommended three courses of action and the Town Board chose to
amend Ordinance No.8, Section 7, Permitted Uses to read:
"EXCEPT for the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, this
shall not apply to lots of record at the time this ordinance is
adopted." The motion carried.
,
Rither made the motion to refer the Clifford Chapman request to
'rezone the above-described property... from R1, Single Family
Estate to R3 Single Family Suburban, because it appears the
rezoning request should be considered with the proposed amendment
of Section 7, Ordinance 8. The motion carried.
The records are then silent as to what happened to this request,
however, it appears that someone interpreted it to mean that the
property was rezoned to R3 as that is the zoning that is carried
on the Official Zoning Map.
Page Two
Agenda Item 7c
7 June 1988
The issue is whether or not the lots are now buildable and
capable of casting a vote in regard to the petition for streets.
Because Mr. Chapman owns the "unbuildable lots", he can put the
kabosh on the whOle project.
More importantly, if no action was taken in regard to the
subdivision and no action was taken on the rezoning request, did
these matters become approved because of the inaction of the Town
Board?
Attached are the minutes found in this regard. There are no
records before or after these minutes that deal with this matter.
This will be on the City Council agenda tonight and your
consideration is important.
~7
d'Arc<;1
Attac&nfents
November 14, 1972
Clifford Ch!31l/1I1':111 ;;1.1'l'GPrl'lr.l h,fnJ:';" t.ho 'fo','m no~u'u I-"bout I;ho
'11J1~1J in h1rJ 8ubdlv.Lr:Jlon. It h:'O) h0011 .'l'l'I'OV(Hl 1,):/ thp. ZoniuG T:J,l1d
p t"lIll1nG COlnmiS/31on 011 Uovellluul' 2/1. 1 ~'i'O; I; lH.l.l: ho Guuld bu:1.ld all ever;;
I .'
"t hn r J.o l. 'f,H()1l:\f.~~~i.:m:,::~/a,s.,;"e.Y or '1:Hkon hj' I.Iw 'I'o~"!l1 Dutilrd.f ~S>~.~~~.I1I:~~~~..~.e'3.
,;!<:; 1"3.C h~J; !ted ejldjJ.here:>.)';.B')lO fJ v:l. df.lllC (. I) f tho ~l'OVIU Board. .t.t~ltlllr.r.2il.l1Y H
';",1.' "
: ~.:!",.:.Lon.j
'l'ho luts ,'.1'0 undor 'I;ho l".:Jqu i.r(l',l (,07{, of l:lw G1'~mdrlJ.ther
r;'I ;.~llfJO, Hili!. I;ho only V1uy now 1u 1;0 tl111'1:i for l'HZon:l.Il~.' 111'. Chaplllv,n
:'f,;I;ad if ho could. gol; I'" build.LlIG pCl'l!ri t 1101"17 'I'h01'e 113 110 1I0801bJ.0 vWJ'
l1ut:il tho ~l'own Board has'l;nltoll 1.1,\:1;1011. lJe heW I:,pp]j.ed'fur rezon:'.I1G.
'lld the head.ne wIll be on ,'l'uo!:Jday. ~!ov\llllbQr 23, 1972.
November 28, 1972
At 10.1.5 Publio llearing _. called. fer Ollrrerd Oh&pIl&n--reunlng R-I,
h R-3.'. The "est t e! H.lI'. t er the S.W. t of 81tcUen 1.5, Tnnship :)2,
Range 24 in AnekaOeunty, HlnMseta. ChairalUl Jaw.raki stated' the rea_on
,..~haJ?lllll.n is, requeotiDg ,reunlng b becaWle hlsl.ts de not1.eet 6Q%\erthe"
\rt'lqulrelllent.a~.ef, Ol:dinano,!, 0' lIe1aaek asked ChaJllll1D if he had deeds filed
on eaoh let. Ohap.an stated h_ bad dens se en Deceaber 31, 1970, lIela.ek
also stated that Inerder to aee\ 60% rlt'lulreaent under R-l hls lots ,.euld
haye te be apprexlaately 1 2/J aores, lIelll.ek ...id th&t, if it ns resened
to R-J withclUt a stipulation Chapllan ceuld bulld en every let, Ohaplllln
sald he inhnded t. bulld en every let. At 10.J.5 Jehnllen ....d. a ..tien te
change to R-J with atipulation h. weuld be abh h build .nl;r sn f/'ter:r ether
101;. Seceoded by lI.laaek. Dlsou..hn relIned with Ohap.an sa;ring thls HaS
unacceptable. John.sn X'e'lue.t..t per.leeien t. withdraw hia .etien, lIelaeek
neha becaUlle it na aeconded it oannet be "UhdrtUfn. A.yet.,.... put en the
~etl.n--2 fer, 4 against. "otlen net oarried. Olendenln8.-d. a ..ti.n te
leavs.aawa as R-l olassificatlon. Seoended by Jehnasn. :Chairaan Jawsraki
noted,Ch&paan's re&ll.n fer 0..1118 1fllS a chanS. te R-J, The,vete waa 2 for,
2 against, 1. abat.ntien by Dutten. Chalraan Jawerski veted t. break tie,
whlch made it J agalDat, leaying lt as R-l. At thls pelnt Chapaan backed
up and said he weuld aocept plan put forth that he would,be able te bulld
en every ether let .w.)'. lIelank atated h. wanted letlS t. ~ .. dedgnated
as to whloh en". OhaJll&n 0.u1d bulld .n. Jsn.. Mde a .etien t. reo...end
tint Town Board e! Supervisors Moept renning tit R-J with ISUpulatlon'
that onl)' every .ther let is bulldable. Dutton seoonded. Only lots B, D,
F. lI, J, K, L, N, P, H, T, & V shall be des1gnated illS buildable, It is nltted.
that thllJ lnferr'''I.i;ion IIheuld be available to the building ll18peotor, The
voh was 4 for and 1 agalnst.
Meeting was adjourned at 10'55.
Mary Kegler, Olerk'
Planning and Zoning Ooa~issi.n
December 12, 1972
Clifford Chapmall appeared before ~he Board to ask for rezoning'
on the West Half of the Northwes~ Quarter of ~he Southwest Quarter of
section 15, Township 32, Hange 24, J\noka County, Minnesota, from H I.
Single Family Estate, to H 3 single Family Suburban. After discussion,
J\ttorney Dabco,ck presented three alternatives for the 'I'own Board to
examine:
1. 'I'he '!'ownship could en ter into a con tract wi th Mr. Chapman.
2. J\mend Section 7, Permitted Uses, of Ordinance 8.
3. By placing a covenant on the deeds.
Hither questioned what would be the best order to do themI' First would
be to amend the ordinance, second to enter a contract and third to put
covenants on the deeds. llither presented the following motion: I move
that Section 7, Permitted Uses, H 3 Single Family Suburban District of
Grow 'l'ownship, Ordinance (J as adopted October 21, 1970, be amended to
read:~~~,~!"1-:,[r~or;:_t~~.i'L':ler:;t lIalf...of the Northwest Quarter o(...the SouthwestJ
'. ",~' . ,':; " . ~', :.)
Q~~~:ter ".of..SecHon'lS ~: 'l'ownship 32, Hange 24, this ,shall not, apply tol
}o.~.~.~"of ...~E!!=l~f'~" a t"thEl,,:time this. ordinance is adoPte:ci~,,\ Bradley seconded
and thei,m. (!;'f16H catr'ied.. Hither made a motion we refer)the Cl.ifford J
,-.,......-. ... ,.,'., . I , (lx.leL 6:j tiLl> PeltZ g'Y W/7iLC r
Chapman r~questtorezone the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of
the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, 'l'ownship 32, Hange 24 from H 1,
single Family Estate to H 3 Single Family Suburban,. because it appears
the rezoning request should be considered with the proposed amendment
"
of Section 7, Ordinance o. Bradley seconded and motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 8
Section 7.01 Permitted Uses in All Districts
R-3 Single Family Suburban District
Urban Agricultural Uses
Single family residential buildings
Private sewer
.
Pursuant to the Town Board Minutes dated December 12, 1972,
Ordinance 8, Section 7, Permitted Uses, R 3 Single Family
Suburban District of Grow Townshiup (adopted October 21, 1970,
published January 1,. 1971) was to be amended as follows:
Except for the West half of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, this
shall not apply to lots of record at the time this ordinance
is adopted.
The language ,underlined above appears to be a part of that Motion
but does not reflect all of the language contained in the Motion.
The Minutes should be further researched to see if any clues can
be uncovered as to how, when and where this amendment was made,
if it was published, etc.
. .
6.03 Zoning District Map
The boundaries of the DIstricts
as established by the ordinance are
as shown on the map publis)'led
herewith and made part of this
... "t'dinnnce whlcn Is designated as
~ "Zoning District Map", which
,p is properly approved and filed
." Ilh the Grow Township Clerk. The
district boundary lines on said map
are Intended to follow street rlght-
o!.way Hnes. street centerlines, or
lot lines unless ::.uch boundary line
Is otherwise indicated on the map.
In the CD-se of unsubdivlded pro-
perty or in any case where street
or lot Unes are not used as bound-
aries. the. district boundary lines
shall be determined by use of di-
mensions or the scale appearing on
the map.
All of the notations. references
and ethel' infol'mation shown there.
on shall have the same force and
effect as if fully set forth herein
and are hereby made part of this
ordinance by reference and incor-
porated herein as fully as if set
forth herein at length.
Section 7-PERMITTED USES
7,01 Within any of the foilowing
districts, no structure or land shall
be used except lor one 1) or more
o,f the uses listed by district:
PERMITTED USES IN ALL
DISTRICTS
Public utlllty uses for local serv..
Ice when located within public
right-of-way. All other public utn.
lty uses require a special use per.
mite
PubUc: and private forests and
wild life reservations and pUblic
parks.
Public owned and operated pro..
perty except as herein amended.
Public elementary. Junior and
. ""lior high schools.
3IDENTIAL
R..I Single Family Rural District
Agricultural uses.
Any site which has more than
five (5) non-domestic animals per
acre shall require a special use
permit.
Single family residential struc..
tures.
R-Z Single Family Estate District
Urban agricultural us.es.
Single family residential build-
Ings.
R-3 Single Family Suburban District
Urban Agricultural uses.
Single family residential build-
ings.
Private sewer and water systems
shall only be permitted on every
other lot or no more frequently
than one private system for ~ach
40.000 sq. ft. where large lots are
established. This shall not ar,pIY to
lots of record at the time th S ordi..
nance Is adopted. On each new plat,
the lots to be developed in accord..
ance with this section shall be so
designated.
R-4 Slnlle Family Urban District
Urban agricultural uses.
Single family residential build-
Ings.
Private sewer and water systems
l'i:hal1 only be permitted on every
i lot or no more frequently
It;n:'h<:Je sr:::Z' l~~; ~ar~h e~~~g<!
ushed. This shall not apply to lots
of record at the time this ordinance
is adopted. On each new plat the
lots to be developed In accordance
with this section shall be so desig-
nated.
R-5 Manufactured lIousln, DIstrict
(
~{obl1e homes and modular homes
provided they are developed under
a "planned unit development" and
the compiex is a minimum of 20
acres or 50 dwelling units In size.
Multiple dwellings shall be per-
~\~ti~s~~dar~U~~~~lo~t G~02d:~~t~s a:
part of the planned unit develop..
ment.
M-I Multiple Dwelllnl
Townhouses not to exceed eight
(8) units per building with public
sanitary sewer and water service.
M-2 ~[ultlple Dwelllnl .
Townhouses not to exceed eight
(8) units per building at a M..t dis-
trict designation with public sani-
tary sewer and water service.
Multiple dwellings with public
sanitary sewer and water service.
RECREATIONAL
GR General Recreatlon District
Golf Courses
Motets and hotels
Resorts
Sporting goods and boat sales In-
cluding service and rental
Information centers
Cafes and restaurants
Urban agricultural
7.01 BUSINESS
LB Limited BusIness
Urban agriculture
Medical and dental clinic
Business schools
G.eneral offices
Mortuary or funeral home
Rest homes. nursing homes
Photo studio
Professional offices. clinics and
hospitais
Churches
Radio-television studios
NB Neighborhood Buslness
Medical
Offices and studios
Retail shopping
Restaurant
SC Shopping Center District
All uses permitted in uNB" dis-
trict
GB, General Business District
.i\utomoblle agency
Research
Automobile service except serv-
ice staUon (only by special use)
Urban agriculture uses
Transportation terminal or motor
freight terminal
Warehousing
Wholesale business
Medical
Olllce.
Manufacturing (Umlted)
Hotel, Motel
Clubs. lodges, Institutions
Mortuary and funeral home
Farm equipment. sales !outslde
operation by special use on y)
\
Veterinary clinic or hospital with
no outside pen~.
INDUSTRIAL
LI Limited Industrial District
Urban and rural agriculture uses
Manufacturing (limited)
Medical
Offices
Research
Wholesale business
Warehousing
PubUc utillly buildings and stor-
age
Veterinary clinic or hospital with
no outside pens
Miscellaneous Industry
GJ General Industry District
Urban and rural agriculture uses
Manufacturing (limited and gen4
eral)
Medical
Offices
Research
Transportation terminal or motor
freight terminal
Wholesale business
Warehousing
Pubilc utilily buildings and stor-
age
Veterinary clinic or hospital with
no outside pens
Miscellaneous Industry
7.02 PERMITTED ACCESSORY
USES
With the foilowingg dlslrlcts, the
listed uses shall be permitted ac...
cessory uses:
ACCESSORY USES
In Ail Residential Districts
Keeping of domestic animals (3
or less except in R...l)
Open, off street parking space
(not more than 4 vehicles per one
and two family homes)
Gardening and other horticultural
uses
Keeping at not more than two
boarders or roomers by a resident
family with no private cooking
facilities
Private garages
Home occupations meetln" cri..
teria
Recrl!ation areas and swimming
pools
In Ail Multiple Dwelllnl Districts
Swimming pools and recreation
areas or structures
Garages and storage structures
for trash or garbage
In All Business and Industrial
Districts
Any Incidental repair, process..
lng. and storage necessary to con-
duct a permitted principal use but
not to exceed thnty (30) percent
of the floor space of the. principal
building. ,
7.03 SPECIAL USES
Special use permits for uses not
listed heretn shaH not be granted
except where the governing body
determines that said uses are sim-
Ilar In character to those listed
herein.
Within any of the following dls-
I/,/.
,-./,( .
","'\
L,
trlcts, no land 01 structure shall be
used for the following uses by
districts except by special use per..
mit and in accordance with the crl..
teria as stated In Section 5.03 (B):
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
Cemeteries
Commercial greenhouse
Public utility uses or structures
except when located upon public
right-of-way
Churches
Dog kennels In R-l district only
Two family homes In R..4 and
R-S dlstrlcls oniy
Rest homes. nursing homes and
hospitals
Day nurseries
Golf courses
Marinas
Clubs and lodges
RIding stables
Colleges and similar Institutions
Storage bundlngs for boats. snow-
mobiles or similar vehicles in R-5
only
Christmas tree sales
Highway construction materials
(processing and storage)
Excavations except :when a build-
Ing permit has been Issued
MULTIPLE DISTRICTS
All uses permitted by special use
In Residential Districts except dog
kennels.
RECREATIONAL DISTRICT
GR General Recreation District
Outdoor Theaters
Dance halls
Commercial recreation other than
specifically permitted
Commercial riding stables
Commercial parks. camp grounds,
trail rides, gun clubs and ranges.
archery ranges. race tracks. com-
mercial snowmobile courses
Tavern as secondary use of prop..
erty
Golf driving range and puttlnc
courses
Marinas
BUSINESS DISTRICTS
LB Limited Business
Multiple dweUings with town-
houses at an M-l density and others
as an M-2 density
Two family dwellings
Clubs and lodges
Molel
NB Nel,hborhoud Buslness
Service station after minimum
2000 sq. ft. of retail floor space is
constructed
Veterinary cUnic or pet hospital
with no outside pens
Outdoor display only during op-
erating hours
Be Shop pin, Center
Service station after minimum
25,000 sq. ft. of retail floor space is
constructed
Veterinary clinic or pet hospital
with no outside pens
Page 10
." '<1'
,
u
v.l
~
~
~
o
N
~
-
~
..,.
",.-"-
V>
~
"'"
~
M
~
N
~
-
~
o
I I I I
I I I I
al
o
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I~
r.:
.; .; I I
--
I I I ~
'"
I I
8888
1t"l000
",r-:r-:r-:
* * *
88~~
~-lt")\t')
~~oOoO
--**
~I I
~
.; I I I
-
.;
V> I I I
N
~
5 :l
8 8
<> O't:l
.!:l toO ::c .8
::l.5 = u
8' =-=- :l'~~
~" ~Sl38!-o<:
.r-) .,: ~ 8 ~ ~ >,
.I. Go) a 0 .- =-=
~~ ,'; ~:;'a ~ ~
.- 0) '-'- ~ u. u.
~ ,< '1(e u. il il
~ -::>1f~ ~oo
. Q . ._.5
\0 .....I ...... V)V)
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
888
It"llt"llt"l
-:'NM
888
It"l It"l In
-:"r-iC'f'i'
~~~
t<i..;",
8
o
..0
888
000
";",..0
888
qqq
V> \0 r-
. . .
&&&
It"l \0 r-
. . ,
I I I
I I I
I I I
~
'E
::l
8
11 '~j
=>,8e
<>u80
,I';.~~ 8
as al ls
<:11l.!.N
I I I I
I I I I
I, I I I
I I I I
I I I I
8 I I
00
8 I I
00
I I I g
c..
I I I g
c..
g$$g
0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
. . .
gggg
_0\0\0\
...on* * *
g I I I
c..
~ I I I
-
g I I I
c..
'"
0)
toO 8
S ~]
~ -=- .i ~
oJ!~~!-o<:
~~ggaa
]g~~~~
lo\'8 8 8 ~ ~
o;:,~~g,og,o
Ii: ~MVjtii
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
88~
In r- -
88~
It"lr--
88~
In r- -
080
o It"l
It"lr-_
S;;;8~
1Or--
. . .
88~
r-oo-
. . .
I I I
I I I
~ I I
~
::l
:e.
8
i
raal
'E~
.. ::l 0
ra .:;:
= >,8:a
v(.)~-c
s.!;i "" <:
"'uO).c
8.E al \;l
<~"':"ti1
~
.0
~N
-.>(S;;;
+l:lo
~I:>.o
N 'N
- ~8
+,>(0
~l:lo
N I:>.N
-';8
+ 1:>.0
0", .
N.>(O
N~N
o r:>.~
:J: 0
N
o
~
o
~
o
~
8
~
8
~
8
o
N
.;
In
.;
N
~
o
N
~
o
N
.;
-
<II
V>
8
-
e~\n
. . '<t
. .
. .
00
-'<tlt"l
: : ~
. .
000
M In '<t
-
000
M~~
000
r'f'l~oo::t
000
M~"I';t
000
f11~~
01t"l0
f"1~""'"
01t"l0
f"')~"Ct
000
('f')~oo::t
000
~~M
oo~
MM.
-.
00lt"l
f"1~M
000
~~"Ct
000
C'I~v
''t:l
a
.~
~ '"
8
::l
8
o '2
In '13
>.
=Ei
o 8",
V) cS 15..
il ~
toO 0)
C C
O;;i C
o ",'_
It"l .... >.
0'2
l:!i:o
o't:l
~ ~ ~
2~
g~
~ 1l't:l
.l::"3 8:
::l 0 00
as ~ r-:
o:;~O?
It'') ..0..9 II")
=.c 0
'" u '
.c ::l In
'" '" .c
o 11~ ;0
1n.!2",e
>. CIl .s
~ S 1l
Jgofi) "0
o t 5 c
It"l 08 '"
~:a ~
,..
,..
GI
Cl
co
D.
o
"'"
.::-
.~
.8
'2
::l
=
's
=
';;:j
E
.9
~
'"
-s
'"
>''''
-a.:u
0'"
oJ!
~'"
e::-~ CD
_~ r
=.-
'" 't:l GI
8.5 Cl
g.:g ~ :.
-::l .
~ 0"""
'" ~ =
o ",.9
..",..
'2 5 ~
::n:> v.l
-0::::100"
<>~~
= '"
c bO '"
o:l C u
p:;':;: IS
>..~ c
'o~'E!
"3~o
;l: .!! S
o =.~
= ~V,
<: .
. *
* * *
o
M
~
o
M
o 0 In
It"l N
oV')V') 000 10
-NM C'f'l......~ It')
-
o
It"l
~
o
In
1:: 1:: l:!i:
~ ~ ~ ~'""' ,....'"
8 u '" u 8 ~ 8 .5 ~ II .~ '
..-=-] ls~ls],"e ,....~B b8
=3 "'0'" o~ E8u '-'
e e~ t:.O_ 00";3' V ~ v..w ::s '-" 2 ..-.. ~ ~
u.G~ ~ls~~~~~jE~~U~~
~.ej ~.;bO~~~~~.~e~~~j
- ~-~._-- ",,,,-'-'~,,,
~~; ~j~~ls;ls;g~1l~~'t:lQ
-~a"585t~a~a..utfr~~t
:::: U >. ~ "" 0 "" > ~ >. ~ i:''Eb"t:l > Cl .. >. ~
~~~Ml~lSS~~3~$8-~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~::C~ .3u.<:
'"
.ee
.3
~
.:;:
5
""
'ii.j
~
~
8
-
00
-'<tlt"l
: : 'V
* .
i
o
o
M
~
00
-'<Tlt"l
: : 'V
. .
o
M
o
In
-
00
-'<tv>
: : en
. .
o
M
8
-
00
-'<T1t"l
::r")
* *
o
M
o
-
o
N
-
o
M
o
-
00lt"l
_MM
o
It"l
-
o
M
o
-
001t"l
MMM
o
It"l
-
o
M
o
-
001t"l
NMM
o
00
~
o
-
\0
00lt"l
-MM
8
-
o
-
It"l
M
00lt"l
-MM
It"l
\0
-
It"l
M
o
-
001n
-It"lM
8
M
o
M
o
-
001t"l
- In M
.~ ..:.
f. Compliance with Law. The' final plat sh.911 be
pre-part'd in accordance with all applicable State laws.
and Count V Of"dinanct'S.
11.02. Council Action. T~ Council shall act on the
final pial wilhin60davs 0' Ihe datt' on which if was filed
wilh tht' Clerk. The 'ina' plat shan nol be approved If if
does. not conform to Ihe preliminary plat includino aU
changes required bV the Council. or does no' meet Ihe
engine-ering and des.ign slandards and specificalions of
Ihe Community.
11.0J Recordin,. Following approval of Ihe fiMI plat
bv Ihe Council. the Clerk shall promplly nollfy Ihe
subdivider Of said approval and wilhin 30 days
Ihereafter. the final pial shall be recorded with the
Regisler of Deeds or Registrar of Tilln of Anoka
County. The subdivider Shall forthwith furnish the
Clerk with a tracing and 3 copies of Ihe flna' pial as
recorded. showing evidence of Ihe recording on said
copies. Failure of Ihe subdl.vider to comply with the
requirl!'ment of recording shan be cause for rt'sclsston
of .approval.
11.04 Required Flnil' Plat Dat.. It shall be .
candillon 10 Ihe approval of .. final plat th.t the
lollowing dala shall be shown on said plat or shall be
lurnished Iherewlth:
a. Municipal. lownship. county or section lines
accurately lied 10 Ihe boundaries of Ihe subdivision by
distancn and angles.
b. Accurate angular and lineal dimensions 'or' all
lines. anoles and cur va lures used to describe
boundarin. streets, easemenls. areas. reserved lor
public use. and other important fealures shall be
shown. Complete curve data shall be shown. Including
radii. ir'lternal angll!'S. points and curvatures. tangent
bearings. and lengthS of all arcs. Dimensions of lot
lines shall be s.hown in 'eet and hundredths of feel. No
dino work shall be permitted in indicating dimension.
c, Official monuments as designated and adOplf:d by
'he County Surveyor and approved bV the District
Courl lor use as judicial monuments shaU be Sf:1 .,
each corner or anole of the oulside boundary of the
final pial. Location and ties of all monuments shall be
shown.
d. Pipl!'S or steel roos shall be placed al each corner
0' each lot and thl!' location thereot shall be shown.
e. An identification system for an lols and blocks
shall be shown.
t. Streets Shalt be named and all names shall be
shown. A sfquence of street naming shall be followed
consislenl wilh the pattern that has been eslabliShed In
the area.
9. In the event the final pial is" re.plal of an earlier
subdivisicn. the original platting 01 Ihe subdivision
s.hall be shown and Identified bv dolled lines.
h. Judicial and county ditches shall be shown by
dimensions and angles as determined 'rom counly
records.
I. Low land and waler areas shall be Indicated by an
idenli,ication symbol.
I. The maximum highwater level as. defined in the
DePilrtment 0' Conurvation Regul.atlons .and
Slalewide Slilnduds and Criteria for Management of
Shoreland Areas of Minnesota.
k, All ulilltv and drainage easements. and the
dimensions Ihereof. shall be shown.
I. The names and plaltino of adfoining subdivisions
shall be shown and identified by dolled lines to "
distancl!' of 100 leet Irom the bOund.ries of the
subdivision under consideration. lot, block and str~1
arranc;Jements 01 such adjoining subdivisions shaft be
shown. Where adjacent land Is unp;atted, it _ shall be so
indicated.
m. Before any residential plat may be approved and
before any permit may be Issued for a residence
Iherein. the subdivider shall first present competent
proof Ihat thenalural ground waler level at an limes in
said subdivision is nolll!'SS than 3 feel below the level of
Ihe 10wI!'sl portion of the propos.ed struClure, or Ihal "
satislaclorv system at ground Woller control will be
comlructed as. an inl~gral pari 01 the proposed
rnidentlal subdivi,ion.
SECTION U. REGtSTE~ED LAND SURVEYS.
The provisions 0' lhis ordinance shall apply to all
r~islered land surveys within IheCommunitv. and the
standards, rtoulalions and procedures hereo' shall
govern the Subdivision of land bV registered land
survey. BuildinO permi's shall be withheld on tracls
which have been subdivided bV unapproved rC'Vlsterrd
land surveys; and Ihe Community shall decline to
accepl tr acts as slreels or road' or to Improve, repair
or maintain such lracts within an unapproved
regis.lered land survey.
SECTION U. EASEMENTS.
Prior '0 Ihe submission of a final plat, registered
land surveyor land subdivision 10 the Council for
approval. Ihe subdivider shall furnish Ihe Community
with all easements 101' ulilllles.dralnage. street rights.
Of.waV. surlace waler ponding, and such olher public'
uses as shall be lound to be necessary. convenient or
desirabte bV Ihe Community. Said easemenls shall be
in proper form lor recording In the OfficI!' of the
Register of Deeds or Regislrar of Titles. Duplicate
cerlilicales of tille shall be made available for the
liling 0' easements on regislered tand. No final plat
shall be approved bV the Council unlil there has been
'ull compliance with Ihis section.
SECTION 14. RESTRICTIONS ON FILING AND
RECORDING CONVEYANCES.
14.0t Restricllons on Filing and Recording. In
accordance with applicable Slale law, no COllvle')'ance
of land 10 which the regulations are applicable shall be
flied or recorded. II the land Is described in the
conveyance by metes and bounds or bV reference to an
unapproved regislered land survey made aller April
21. 1961 or 10 an unapproved plat made after such
regulations become effective. The foregoing provision
does nol apply to a conveyance If the land described:
(11 was a separate parcel of record April ,. 194$ or
the dall!' of adoption 01 subdivision regUlations under
Laws 1945, Chapler 281. whichever is Ihe later. or 01 the
Adoption 01 subdivision regulalions pursuant to a home
rule charier, or
(2) was the subJect 01 a wt'ltten agreement to convey
enlered into prior 10 such lime,
~ (3) was a separate parcel of not less than two and
l one.half acres in area and ISO feel In width on January
1. 19~6 or is a single parcel 01 land not less Ihan five
acrnand having a widtholnolless than 300 'eet.
In any CUI!' In which compliance with Ihe foregoing
reslriclions will create an unnecessary hardShip and
failure.ocomplydoes not inlerfere with Ihe purpose of
Ihe subdivision regulations, the planing aulhorlty may
waive such compliance by adoplion 01 a resolulion to
that effecl and Ihe conveyance may Ihen be filed or
record~d. Any ownrr or agent 01 Ihe owner of land who
<onveys a lot or parcel in violation of Ihl!' provisions of
Ihis SUbdivision shall lorleit ,nd pay 10 the
municipalilya penallv of not less than noo.oo for each
101 or parcel so conveyed. A municipalltv may mioin
such conveyance or may recover such penaltv bV a
civil "lion in anv court 01 competent Jurisdiction.
Seh /01< tl/rundnw..d:- B-5-l9<O
14.02 H~rdship. In any c,)Se in which compliance with
he foregoing rntrlclions will create an unnecessary
lards hip and lailure 10 comply does not inlerlere with
Ihe purpose of Ihis ordinance, the Council may waivl!'
such compliance bv adOPlion 0' a resolulion 10 thai
effecl and the conveyance may then be filed or
recorded.
14.01 Penalty. AnV owner or agenl of 'he owner of
land who conveys a 101 or parcel 1n violation of the
provision, 01 Ihis se<tion shall forfell and pay 10 the
Communilva penaltv 01 nolless than SIOO'or uch lot
or parcel so conveyed. Thl!' Communilv may enioln
such conveyance or mav reCOVer such penalty by a
civil action in any court 01 compel~nt Jurisdiction.
SECTION .i. PLATS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.
All preliminarv or linal plats. reoistered land
surveys. or other subdivisions of land approved bv the
Town Board bul not liIed with Ihe Regisler of Deeds
under previOUS ordinances shall not be subjecl 10
requirements of this ordinance, provided said
()/:,j.~/o
subdivision is Iiled within 6 monthS of the ellective dale
01 this ordinance.
seCTION u. PERMITS
16.0t Improvements, AU electric and gas distribution
lines or piping. roadways. walks and other similar
Improve men Is shall be constructed only on a street, or
other pUbliC way or easement which Is designated on
an approved plat. or properly indicated on the official
map of Ihe Community. or which has olherwise been
approved bV the Council.
}l 1&.01 Access. No permit for the erection of any
building shall be 1ssued unless such building Is to be
localed upon a parcel of land abottlng on . slreel or'
highway whiCh has been deslgnaled on an approved
plat. or on the official map 0' Ihe Community, or which
has been olhl!'rwlse approved bV Ihe Council. This
limitalion on issuing permits shall nol applv to planned
unit developments approved bV Ihe Council pursuant 10
Ihe Zoning OrdlnenCI!.
~U.Ol Llmitallons. No building permit shall be Issued
fortheereclionol anV building onany land conveyed In
violation ollhe provisions of this ordinance. No permit
shall be issued tor the erection ot anV building on any
Iracl of land described by metes and boundS and
consisting of less Ihan 5 acres and having a widlh ot
Ius Ihan 330 leet.
SECTION 11. VARIANCeS.
.J. 17.01 Hardship. The Council may granl a variance
- from the requirements of Ihls ordinance as to specific
Iracls of land whlre It Is shown Ihal by reason 0'
tOpQ9raphy of olher phVsic:al condlllons stricl
compliance with these requirements could cause an
exceptional and undue hardShip 10 the enjoyment of a
substanllal properly right; provided, Ihat a variance
may begrantedonly If Ihe variance does not adverselv
affecl the adlacent property owners and
ComprehenSive Plan or the spirit and Intent of this
ordinance,
17.01 Procedure. 'Nrlnen application lor a variance
Shall be tiled wllh Ihe Clerk, and shall state lully all
facts relied upon bv the applicant. The application
shall be supplemented wilh maps. plans or olher data
which may aid In an analysis 01 the malter. The
ipplicatlon shall be referred to the Planning
Commission tor ils recommendalion and report to 'he
Council.
11.03 Council Action. No variance shall be granled by
Ihe Council unless It, shall have received the
affirmative vote of a majority 0' the full Council.
SECTION 11. VIOLATION AND PENALTY.
Anv person, firm or corporation violallng any 01 the
provisions of Ihls ordinance shall be ouilty of a
misdemeanor. and upon conviction thereof shall be
punished bv .. fine 01 not more than SJOO or by
imprisonment not 10 exceed 90 days or both lor each
ottense.
The platting. replalting, SUbdividing or conveyance
0' land not In accordance with the requirements of Ihis
ordinance mav be enforced by mandamus. InJunction.
or any other appropriate remedy in any court 01
competent lurisdiction.
SECTION 1'. REPEAL.
All ordinances or porlions thereot in conflict with the
provisions 0' Ihis ordinance are hereby repealed.
SeCTION 20. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Thisordinance shall take effecl and be in torce Irom
and after lis passagl!' and publicalion.
Passed bv the Council Ihis 15th day of February.
"n. '
Lou Applebv
CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
Marv L. Wesl
CLERK
abcdelc;Jhi IklmnopqrstuvwxVz
Published in Anoka Co. Union
Feb. 25. 1972
.~..._.._-----_.._---_.,.._.~.....~,.
7:30 P.M.
7:30 P.M.
~,
Q
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 19, 1988
1. Call to Order
2. Resident Forum
3. Agenda Approval
4. Discussion Items
a. Bent Creek Estates Preliminary plat
b. Coon Creek Regional ponding
c. Mamlock Fencing/Drainage
d. Approve Deeding East 33' to Property Owners
NE of SW of Section 9
e. Assessment Policy Uplander street 88-14
f. Final Payment 87-6 Commercial Park
g. Bond Sale
h. Revision to Development Contract
i. Request a Public Hearing on High Risk Sexual
Conduct Ordinance
j" purchase property in TIF District
k.
5. Staff, Committee, Commission
a. Approve Installing Handicapped signs
b. Award Bid/Hawkridge park
c.
6. Non-Discussion Items
a. Old Colony Estates Final Plat
b. Accept Easements 88-2 ward Lake Drive
c. Award Bid 88-1 Crosstown Boulevard
d. Approve Plans and Specs, Order Ad for Bid
88-13 Creekhaven; 88-17 Red Oaks Manor 5th;
88-21 Northwoods Tennis court; 88-8 Old
Colony Estates
e.
7. Approval of Minutes
8. Approval of Claims
9. Adjournment
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE Julv 19. 1988
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion I m
Engineering
<1~
ITEM
NO.
Bent Creek Estates
Preliminary Plat 4a.
BV:Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to review and approve the
preliminary plat, grading, drainage, and erosion control plan per
Ordinances 8 and 10.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the preliminary
plat and their comments are as follows:
General Comments:
* The preliminary plat consists of 11 residential lots which are
currently zoned R-4.
* The proposed plat is within the Metropolitan urban Service Area
(MUSA) .
* Total acreage of the plat is 12.0.
OTHER COMMENTS:
* THOMAS Me CABE IS FEE OWNER OF PROPOSED LOTS 9, 10, 11 OF BLOCK
1. WRITTEN CONSENT BAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED FROM MR. MC CABE. IT
IS RECOMMENDED TO RECEIVE WRITTEN CONSENT FROM MR. MC CABE OR
REDRAW THE PRELIMINARY PLAT EXCLUDING MR. MC CABE'S PROPERTY.
* The following comments are per the preliminary plat checklist
(Ordinance 10):
8.01 IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
a. proposed name is Bent creek Estates.
d. Scale is 1" = 50'.
c. The subdivider is Campbell Real Estate.
g. Surveyor is Lot Surveys Company, Inc. Engineer is
Progressive Consulting Engineers, Inc.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
8.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS
o
f. The existing street Right-of-way for Bunker Lake
Boulevard is shown.
j. A soil report has been received. Lowest floor
elevations have been adjusted 3 feet above the
natural ground water level at all times and above
the 100 year flood elevation.
8.03 DESIGN FEATURES
d. The Building Department has reviewed the overall
grading plan and it appears to be adequate. Lot 5,
the developer has proposed to use retaining walls.
9.02 STREET PLAN
c. Lot 11 of Block 1 will need a variance. This section
of the Ordinance does not allow lots to front on
arterial streets. Bunker Lake Boulevard is
considered an arterial street.
9.03 STREETS
a. The typical street section does conform to City
standards for an urban area.
m. All dri~eway access from individual lots shall be
located 60 feet or more from any intersection.
9.06 LOTS
e. Floodplain management is Coon Creek. The developer
is proposing to fill in the ,flood fringe of the
floodplain. All other permits from other agencie~
may be required and would be the developer's
responsibilities.
9.07 PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, OPEN SPACE
Park dedication as required.
o
o
Q
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BENT CREEK ESTATES AS
BEING DEVELOP!D BY CAMPBELL REAL ESTATE IN SECTION 33-32-24.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the
Planning and zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and
reviewed the preliminary plat of Bent Creek Estates; and
WHEREAS, the plat has been reviewed by the Andover Review
Committee; and
WHEREAS, there was no large amount of negative comments; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing and review, the Planning
and zoning Commission recommends approval of the plat citing the
following:
1) A variance from Ordinance 8, Section 4.23, Subsection (a)
as the existing structure of Lot 11, Block 1 encroaches
within the 75 foot setback line which is measured from
the ordinary high water mark.
2) A variance for Lot 11, Block 1 from Ordinance 10, Section
9.02, Subsection (c) as it pertains to the lot fronting on
a county road (Bunker Lake Boulevard).
3} Park dedication as determined by the Park Commission.
WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby approve the preliminary plat of Bent Creek
Estate.
Adopted by the City council of the City of Andover this
, 19
day of
CITY OF ANDOVER
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
J
Planning and Zoning Commission
June 28, 1988 Meeting Minutes
Page Three
Mr. Jacobson was concerned about the siltation fence as proposed
on the fill grading plan and asked if the developer felt erosion
would be a problem. The developer agreed he was concerned about
the erosion.
Motion was made by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner
Vistad that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
to the City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat of Bent
Creek Estates on the property described as Lot 1 of Auditor's
sub. No. 137 of the south half of Section 33, Township 32, Range
24 for the following reasons:
The preliminary plat has been reviewed by the Planning
Commission, the Engineering Department and the Andover Review
Committee for the City' of Andover and though concerns have been
expressed in regard to particular issues. Those issues, by in
large, have been resolved. The Planning Commission has raised
concern as it relates to Lot 11 of Block I with the 60 foot right
of way for Bunker Lake Boulevard but notes that is an existing
structure and further Lot 11 of Block 1 will require a variance
J from Ordinance 8 as it pertains to plats fronting on county roads
(Section 9.02}j however, there is no other way to service this
piece of property as the requirement of a 40-foot service road
would render this parcel unusable. It should be noted that Lot
10 of Block 1 and Lot 1 of Block 1 shall front on the interior
street of Bittersweet only. The developer is required to change
the right-of-way dimension of Bunker Lake Boulevard from 50 feet
to 60 feet as set out in the letter from Anoka County dated Dec.
16, 1981 and reaffirmed with other plats that have been reviewed
by the County as it pertains to right-of-way.
, The approval of the plat is contingent upon the developer
identifying the 75-foot setback line from the ordinary high water
mark of Coon Creek as set out in Section 4.23, subsection la) as
it pertains to shoreline lots. A public hearing was held and
there was input from area residents; however, that input had more
to do with the fact that they were told this property would not
be developed as opposed to strict opposition to the development
of this property as residential building sites. This preliminary
plat would also be contingent upon the developer obtaining from
the City of Andover a conditional use permit as it pertains to
filling in the general floodplain as set out in Ordinance 50 and
further that any permits that are required from the either the
Coon Creek Watershed and/or the Corps of Engineers be received
and favorable approval by those governmental units be granted.
1,:";'''':'.l-''.;~-..~~a~~.:i,~,~,,,~,:'\5,,"-Bi".r,~....~'i.j,~fiplci.i-"J ~:,;;~,..:,,~;i'~'..s.'.i';'" '''-.' :.
~ _" ___. .._._ _ _ ___ ____ . _ _ _ _ ._ ~ . '" .~".~::...t.~-:......';...J.l:"!:I-....f;'~t~......~.. ..... -':,"",--,~~.;;;...",.."~~.,,
. .
II' _.__._
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The city of Andover Planning and zoning Commission will hold a
public hearing at 7:30 ~.M, or as soon thereafter as can be
heard, Tuesday, June 28, 1988 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover MN to consider the preliminary
plat of Bent Creek Estates consisting of 10 single family
residential lots being developed by Campbell Real Estate on the
property described as Lot 1 of Auditor's sub. No. 137 of the
South half of Section 33, Township 32, Range 24.
All opponents and proponents of said proposed preliminary plat
will be heard at the above time and location.
o
'.
.-
CITY of ANDOVER
'.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
Street Location of Property: cl r-"!O i ~vvk lJ< ~ d .
Legal Description of Property: s~? ~~?f5
tlt.>./U) '6 . 'TY1. \'3".1'+1 ~
Y2.~ow~ M. t~-l."- J
Property Owner: 'S.n.lJ~j J r~-~r6?':/,
Address: IS 2.0 ~f1/1 irlJ7.,(+.. J!!. 13 ''vi 0
Applicant: r~-t~1 ~f(L{4.~f-. -rUIC
Address: IS ~g rnll1.'IIJ~~" lit! ~ R LlJ ~:
Description of Request: IC left ~JIl)J:::.iry{ /
....
Phone: '13~ - %'0 /) 1,
-
Phone: q=>, c,- ~oo1
Rezoning Request Required: yes____ ~ Explain
Fee:
Date Paid: 6-1~- 8' 15
Receipt No: :J.7tOG
o
..
ro-/~-tg
(Date)
, .
.-, ,^-,,,,_,,~,,,,,,~,;,"'_._ "h.
applicant one week prior to the hearing.
preliminary plat is placed on city Council agenda. Inform
applicant of the City Council action. If request is
granted, provide applicant with a copy of the resolution
stating the conditions upon which approval is granted. If
denied, provide applicant an explanation of the basis of
denial.
I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the
information and material submitted with this application is
complete and accurate per City ordinance and policy requirements.
I understand that only complete applications will be scheduled
for an appropriate Planning Commission meeting. I understand
that the application will be processed in sequence with respect
to other submittals. ~~~
.~/..
A pant's)ti-9nature
o
,..,~..~
Date
Application Approved By
Date
'.
COUNTY OF ANOKA
Department of Highways
Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer
1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520
March 18, 1988
Progressive consulting Engineers, Inc.
6040 Earl Brown Drive suite 140
Minneapolis, MN. 55430
Attention: Dan Allmaras
Regarding: proposed Cul de Sac off CR 18
Dear Mr. Allmaras:
We have reviewed the sketch you provided for a proposed Cul de
Sac extending south from CR l8/Bunker Lake Boulevard between
Crooked Lake Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevard.
The proposal, at best, is poor from a transportation
standpoint. Bunker Lake Boulevard at this point already
carries in excess of 10,000 cars per day and we expect volumes
to continue increasing. A cul-de-sac with access only to a
major roadway will always be a problem for residents who have
to get in and out of the street on a daily basis and generally
speaking at the peak hour times. As such, we cannot recommend
a cul-de-sac at this location.
We withhold any further comments, concurrence, approval or
recommendations until such time as the City of Andover, the
Coon Creek Watershed and the Army Corps of Engineers have
stated that a proposal of these lots within the floodway and
flood plain are acceptable to all agencies involved. At such
time as these agencies have concurred that this is in fact a
viable plan, we would be happy to comment further on access.
If you should have any questions, please,feel free to contact
me.
Si~e~elY, ~
/0~a:;;;y/~
o
William A. Sironen, PE
Assisttnt County Engineer - Administration
xc: .J:.i ty of Andover
Coon Creek Watershed-.
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
o
~~te
".. :-':;':" ..:'.:~~~.;1'i:. .~."".:.;
Sc~1 e..
-.
o
.~!o
\f"C;'t-I)" /
~'\)
--
I"::O/{)()D A-
~
z "'\
~ r
'" <
~ m RM1"O\
c3~ 0 134TH x~
a ",~\(r ,
~...:; ,
~/~ I
""
ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS
REFERENCE
MARK
RM1
ELEVATION
(FT. NGVD)
B68.2
UII wl,..1 ...iu\.: .,1 Lluol..cd. L:"-I.: BtIUlt:V.lld .11 13"lil ~\V'
.\\'''....1. .ill I,;.I~{ Id\.O: 01 lHIW....' POll'; ill',ll.l 01 !.l~ :o.l.rc\\.
1)\ U.S. (~nllu~il.ll ':)UI\''''\.
A: \H':-'\ ..iJc 01 ClUol..l:d L.ll..l' H\luh:\'.lIo. 4t1"1 pu;..tl'!
01 BUlIh.l'l lo,""' BOUIC\'.Lld NUllhwc~t. (nL'JI tlOUSC I:
hL',ld 1)1 I.IJ.!, :-,;.It"\\'. l::~l,lhli..lll...d tW U.S. (;colo~i1.:.t1 5Ulh'\
DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION
RM2
B79.6
RM3
r4.6
/\IOIl\{ Bun!.."" t .Ill' Boule., ,1...1 NOIlh\Vc~1 ...1 hrid1-!c
Ca'L'''. .Ll jlllH..tio!l oj Up...lIl.:.1111 Wlllgw<.l11 .mtl wl":d .Ii:
plllnl.!,; top 01 thlC.llb 01 bc)1t p.liU1Cd Il'U. ~:tl.lbli::.11
(~l.tlloJ.th. ,II SLII vcy.
RM4
B64,B
AlollJ.:, cd')l b.lOk 01 Coon (lcd.., I,UOO Iccl up:,lfC.Il'll II
I..II..l' Boull'vell d NOllhwl'\I. In 2-1001 di.lIllctcI 4.01 ton
1H.'eld ollel~ ~4.ICW. t="l.lbli~hl.:d hy U,S, Gi..'olo~il,1I SUI'iC\
,\pPIU,,<ilH.1IClv 90 tcel nl'lll1\\'l'~t 01 inlel~Cl..lioll 01 I.:
NOIlhw(,:~l .tlll! CIIl\.U~ SUl'l'! NUllhwc\t, in ~oulh IclL.l
di,lInctcl L.ullol1wt!ul! Ill'I:; IW.ld 01 0.375-inl.h I<l~ ~..l
!i,:>llCd hv U.S, (.e(llu~iL..1l ~lll\'e\,
RM5
B69.1
RM6
B72.4
At \mull CI1<.I vi (Ulllll'li: L.UIVl'll undcl 142nd LillI.'
\\ont' 01 1\'\ wuod :'11'1..'1 NOlthwl.')t: ..Ilisch:d \qu,IlI:.
hv U.S. ('l'oloc,il.,tl SlIIVC\',
AI hlidy-c U\'CI CllOri CICl.'k UIl 'StlUltl CtH)ll e'Cl't.. IJli
lion ul WI..'\I UOWI1)IIC"111 .lhutnll"l1l' witll will1-lW.III; L.lli"
l)I,lhli...hl'd h~' U.S. (jcolo~il.:,a1 SUI \C\'..
RM7
B68.0
'.
Allln~ SoulhCuon CICCt.. Ori\<c, 10 leet nOlll1 o! ~i..'nH::
lk~ll.'l'~ Ill'ud ill Ill,ILI, in )Uuttl 1,1..1.' ul Iwin.l1un1..t:d I
lot'l ,dlOh' ~ItHlOd; I1l',ld 01 O,37".illdl I,l~ ')Ul'W. ~-')
L!.~. ('l'ol(}~i;,,11 SllJ\'C\',
RM8
B79,1
RM9
679.0
Altltl\.~ ~otllh Coon CICCt.. Dlivc, ~:' kel ",oull1 01 '.I~l1ll"
1'.1...101 d:l\l'W.I\' 10 hOU"I' IlU, .!6,ll{, III IS.Ull.h di.lnll'
IW,!d III hl'l11 ().3i'i-indl1,1~ "~Il'\\. l-.~I.lhli~lH'd by L!.:--
....."..'..\'
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE July 19, 1988
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discus,sion Items
Engineering
1"S~
ITEM
NO.
Coon Creek Regional
ponding 4b.
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council i,s requested to approve the proposed areas for
regional ponding within the City of Andover limits.
The City has already been working with the Coon Creek Watershed
Board for regional ponds. Ar~as would include Winslow Hills, Old
Colony Estates and Oak Bluff 2nd Addition.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
\
, '"
. )N NC~1T1-{ERN n~
I
, '"
I
"
I
I
,
: r.
'..:: .--: ~'t --
i ' I "'=------v-
I
:,( I
I
I
,
0,=1
I .~
'~-..
, . I
,
.'/.
'-".:'-'
~; :~~ - "
I"
o
, I
~!~, .
'd
J.>
Z
o
10
.<
m
;J;/'", '
". ' t. l~( !
[D ~:.a~' ,
i,l~:'~ I
:m!l(lm
Sb~.
;.,., .
(IIl,,~ .
UI:-t....
, ~.
b~
"..,
...~
,. j( ?:
, '"' ,~.,~ .
" OJ
~ I'
,
.. "
~~ ;;
, HAlf~H: nOA6
~ 4tt ~
"'VI
'" rJ)
~
~
I\J
(f'
-
""OJ
-c
Zt
'^l
'm
.:0
r'
)>
.^
m
'OJ
r
<,
kJO
~~y
!. .~m.llllli1l II,.
. ~~r.' T ~-~ .
. ." , ~
; ;;,-<.}
1".........."'''"Il..~.
'''l
::i n~
I......'.....
I It;
ROUND V
,'t
~ ,
.r,"'
'"
.I
J
1. r-
',I
t:
0;
I
l_....
"
.
'.
. 1.
,:
-v
,,~ .~
t..-') , : h.
" '., i I<J
.' . -. -).
C/,
....!.-
~IQ ~'""~
m :t~.... m
:< ~!,'::<,,: J;i a,
: .,.~.. :<'.0 ......
.,. ...li" '('I m 0.. . 0
(,;!!-J,.t~\~,~:,,~ :
-.:4 \0-4> -<
. ~, .
m!"R o.
. In ~l /_
:< liO N ::~,
:~~N~ \~,
.~ <"
m~~
"':z: ': 0 .
om < 0
)>om . . .
00 .:.~~
I Q.
."..,
it :1
..
'"
--l
::E
..'~", ~"""''''''''''''''''.'''''''''''"''J
""J"~~;: 1
'1" .. i
~ ~
""'~< j\""..
~i!.j' ,,;:,.
, rf,'
d. c,;j;
I\.;
"
I . '.
. ';~), ~ ; ~.
"...~~
-,
-~ ~~. -..
">Ill..
-," --
, "
'.'
. }l'
. '--'~~""....
..... .
.\\ ','
'. r
J
'C~NTRl\d;A VE.
N~_...: . I
It
,?~.
.'
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE July 19, 1988
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discu
Engineering
.()~
BY:Todd J. Haas
ITEM
NO. Mamlock Fencing/
Drainage 4c.
The City Council is requested to discuss the Mamlock property in
regards to fencing, drainage and/or landscaping. See attached map
for location.
The lot is located across from the Andover Commercial park. Some
options are available. They would include:
1. The property owner fepce the parameter of the rear yard.
A. Maximum height of fencing on the property line is
6 ft.
B. Maximum height of fence 10 ft. off the property line
is 8 ft. This may not solve the problem for the
residents because the fence in either case will not
obstruct the view of the Commercial Park from the
2nd floor. Structure is a split-entry walkway.
2. Berming along Verdin Street is a possibility with some
landscaping (pines, shrubs, etc.). This also will not
obstruct the view of the Commercial Park until the trees
mature.
3. Do nothing.
The property owner will be present at the meeting to answer any
questions the City Council may have.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\
\
I
.
.
(I
. r-I
\ I !
\ I~~
\
I
I
/
.-
--
_ 880 . - - - - -,
\
I
'0
<.'':-'\J
.~
~
. .
L.' .
~"J
" -, '..
L.' "
" -:. _\ '~\i
,-
",' ~
""'
,
\
"-
....
~
~
\\
~
." ,. I
,~._. - ,-
~O
~
~
~ CJ B~2.
~ 0
'-.:.\
.do -
~/
. //
~'
-Y-9IN
-9Gc(3
f
o
!!!
<; -9 s~
J!
~
~
~
~
i
I
\1
...
s
..
..
..
11
<.
r
,
,
~
t
(
$
t
t
<.A! ~.
.b;
'~
(ii.
.....
.....
I\)
".
.....
~: : I
::l.il
/36TH it I ~
.' ~ ' ~
, '
'.
"
.....
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE Julv 19 ,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion
Engineering
~1~
BY:Todd J. Haas
ITEM
NO. Approve Deeding to
Property Owners 4d.
The City Council is requested to approve deeding of the east 33
feet to property owners in the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 9.
See ?ttached map for location of easement.
The 33 feet is located adjacent to Lund's Evergreen Estates 3rd,
4th and 5th Additions. A road pattern for the two areas have been
established, therefore, the 33 feet is not needed although a 10
foot drainage and utility easement is recommended along the entire
stretch of the properties. '
Judy Snyder from 2820 167th Lane NW will be here to discuss this
item with the City Council.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~
o
I
"
~ t,
"t,'
~ 1'1'1
._~p:7
(i9)
(:n-z,y
",.;'.:l.rc~_.
l~
~
CENTER
SEC. 9
""
~i
(;J)
( ~.9.7</
_;~.7
lID e~!"l:"WJ ---
.fhe:.7
"
'''~
f.!1f\
"1'1
I
J
(/7J*' \ Co, ..."
",I
.,7
/,J'.!1'j.f-=- ....
I'
I
I
I:
I:
I~
I
!
- .
~---
~'".;~<::;,,::'
....;~d.7
(14)
(-;.~~~)
L""Vf
J~"'.,7
. ~S.5~
",
"'II
'1,\
(;17)
f~::;1dc")
:
~
.t ft)
..,
~
~
.~
1,.
'~
,,\,
~"
"i~
(9)\
(%'..!'~/'"
..r. .7
~
'i
Ii
..
,..,
.'~ I
.; ~,
,'! ':.. I
{I~(j"l
,
~1. 1
,..,-.~-
"'-,
(4)
*
(I)
~~
~ ~
.'} ~
",.. M
(?-$.z"'!....
SN'tO'R..
..76...,7
-2.;1..~-~--;'~
.. ..%.:fJ.,~,
M
(1M!)
#dt:lA'r /1:..( ..7Z-u;/ s-.Y,PE~
,!~... A'r.
~
--~
~
;j:
_ ___ /,,5'~ '..(i!.:...~
1<f'1
"
fi:
1; '0:0
,~
S
~
...,."
j.,.
A.I.r /,$ ~., r
\
~~
~~
" '
~ '<f\
~ ~ ~
-.... "".
.." r~ ",
"'" '
"....:J./1'lfl'j
$A >If/J.~{,
J!".!7Jf'H
..9:1#
"'';.'. "
,'J
J:~?'Jf.l~
,2
jU:'f
fso.e',$"/y'
o'S
\..u~ / (It)
,
\
. '/'1..,""
hi'f"l'I'f~E. ~
~€.€.
~G
~ -.J €. 2 (It.'
V, I
.lJI,?>'
.1"~' /1.5-1'- ~ 0
~~
oJ"
:S
"
~
~
'U
.....
\,
~
~
,
"
I ~
'Ii " ~
" '"
~;
,\"
tf.,~
~"
~
en
\
en~
~;
'-"" ~,
o .:
~ 5
'<'
::>.
@
to ""f~I'<N
s<t:
.-..
" ' 'J
...
J/5.~,
..5"R".!'~',-'.3E'
2
~
~k
LUNl
+..,.......",
!i
i,~
,.1-~
;:'/'('1'('
~..~~~
.JJ..} "!
/
EVERGJ
.IU"
.f.11....5./~/f
~
~
,;'4)/ S
~i€.
€.si
./,,~..
,,,.,~ ::f~..~ r
Ii
00.
~ 2,;:5.'
2
..
:':-~
'<\:-,
.: - .~'.
,f .'i~ ~~ ,,,;.,: l
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
July 19, 1988
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
FOR
Discussion Items
Engineering
ITEM
NO. Assessment Policy
Uplander St./88-14 4e BY:James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to establish an assessment policy
for 88-14 Uplander Street South.
We are confident the plat was approved with certain lots labled
unbuildable per Planning and zoning minutes and also a map in the
file.
If the vacant lots are assessed the lots end up tax forfeit like
Cedar Crest vacant lots did.
I am going to try to talk to Chapmans, the owners of the
vacant/unbuildable lots.
See May 17th, June 7th & July 5th agenda.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE Julv 19. 1988
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO. Final Payment 87-6
Commercial Park 4f. BY:James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
the work and authorizing final payment for Project 87-6 Commercial
Park Phase I and Verdin Street grading.
The Council approved the final payment on July 5th but the amount
has been disputed (see John Rodeberg's letter).
We were going to try to correct this at the Work Session on
7/12/88 but didn't.
The proposal now is to pay the final not a partial and final.
John's letter explains the disputed numbers.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'.
1'KDA
T.oL TZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.1893
612/292.4400
FAX 612/292,0083
July 12, 1988
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
Re: Commercial Park Phase I and Verdin St. Grading
ProJ ect 87-6
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 8840
Dear Mayor and Council:
At the last regular Council meeting a final payment for the above
referenced project was approved. The contractor, Gammon Brothers, disputes
quantities related to extra work created by delays and inaccuracies In the
soils report. The contractor was required to mobll ize two additional times
to complete the surcharge placement, and was also required to remove 11,000
additional cubic yards of muck excavation, over what was noted on the
pi ans.
This has created an overrun on the contract amounts for common excavation,
muck excavation, and aggregate backfll I material. Mike Gammon, President
of Gammon Brothers, has requested payment for one additional mobilization
at the bid price of $6,215.00 for extra mobilizations. We will submit a
revised final payment for the regular Council meeting on July 19,1988.
In the meantime, we recommend paying the undisputed amount ($31,351.99)
that was previously approved. A revised payment form Is attached to this
letter. Since the contract requires payment within 25 days of the end of
the pay period, whIch Is June 20th, we are obligated to pay Gammon Brothers
for the undisputed amount of the contract before the next meeting.
J
JPR:adh
Enclosure
o
o
Com. No
8840
Cert. No.
3R*
St. Paul, Minn., July 12
I~
Owner
To
City of Andover, Minnesota
This Certifies that
Gammon Brothers
, Contr~ctor
For Commercial Park Phase I and Verdin St. Grading (87-6)
Thirty-one Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-one and
Is entitled to 99/100 Dollars--------------------------------- ($ 31,351. 99
~
)
being 3rd estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated
Sept. 22 I 88
9-
Received payment in full of above certificate.
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS AND ARCHt ECTS
CONTRACTOR
I9-
CONTRACT PAYMENTS CREDITS
PLUS EXTRAS
Contract price plus extras 144,261 16
All previous payments 145,5();; 46
-
All previous credits -
Extra No. Change Order No. 1 - 17,272 66
" "
-
" "
- -
.. "
- ~
" "
- -
Credit No.
" ..
.. ..
- -
.. "
-
AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE 31,351 99
- -
Totals 126,988 50 176,914 45
- -
Credit Balance
There will remain unpaid on contract after payment or this - -
Certificate (49,925 95)
-
-
126,988 50 126,988 50
RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT
o
o
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Engineers-Architects-Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS
Estimate No. ~ Period Ending July 12. 19~ Page
Commercial Park Phase I and
Project Verdin Street Grading. Project 87-6
Location Andover, Minnesota
Contractor Gammon Brothers
1 of 1 Comm. No. 8840
Original Contract Amount
$ 144.216.16
Total Contract Work Completed $ 176.914.45
Total Ap proved Cr ed Its $
Total Approved Extra Work Completed $
Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed $
Total Amount Earned This Estimate $ 176.914.45
Less Approved Credits $-
LessJ- % Rata I ned $ 0.00
Less Previous Payments $ 145.562.46
Total Deductions $ 145.562.46
Amount Due This Estimate $ 31.351.99
o
Engineer
Date
Contractor
Date
7-12-88
0 .Elll.M8ILl::ill...2E *
ANDOVER COMIvERCI AL PARK PHASE I AND V ERD IN SlREET GRAD I NG
ffiOJECT 87-6
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 8840
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
I TEM NO. DESrn I PT ION QUANT ITY UNIT PR ICE: AM)U NT
1 tIOB IL IZATION 1.0 LS 6215.00 6,215.00
2 CLEM ING 7.5 AC 1020.00 7,650.00
3 GRUBB ING 7.5 AC 642.60 4,819.50
4 COMf.ON EXCAVATION 47540.0 CY 1.20 57,048.00
5 MJCK EXCAVATION 29200.0 CY 1.50 43,800.00
6 SALV N3E TOPSO IL (STOCKP ILE 6000.0 CY 0.10 600.00
7 TOPSOIL BORROr\' (LV) 0.0 CY 0.10 0.00
8 15" RCP PIPE SEWER 0.0 LF 24.50 0.00
9 48" RC PIPE SEWER, Q III 0.0 LF 77.00 0.00
10 1 5" RC PIPE AffiON S W/TG 0.0 EA 350.00 0.00
11 48" RC PIPE AffiONS W/TG 0.0 EA 1095.00 0.00
12 60" D I A CB W/ SHORT mNE 0.0 EA 1450.00 0.00
13 CATCH BAS IN DES IGN C OR G 0.0 EA 950.00 0.00
14 RANDOM R I ffiAP, Q III 0.0 CY 35.00 0.00
15 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE IV 0.0 SY 4.80 0.00
16 S IL T FENCE:, PREASSEM3LED 6028.0 LF 1.65 9,946.20
17 ROADSIDE SEEDING 16.7 AC 250.00 4,175.00
18 SEED MIXTURE NO.5 835.0 LB 3.41 2,847.35
19 MJLai MATERIAL TYPE 1 34.0 TN 136.50 4,641 .00
20 COMM FERTlL IZER 10-10-10 4.2 TN 330.75 1,389.15
21 SOD 0.0 SY 1.68 0.00
22 EXXON GTF 300 GEOTEX FABR 6575.0 SY 1.25 8 ,21 8 .7 5
ALT AGGREGATE BACKFILL MAll 11362.0 CY 2.25 25,564.50
------------
------------
176,914.45
o
o
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
ITEM
NO. Bond Sale
4g.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Julv 19, 1988
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY: James E. Schrantz
~
The city Council has scheduled a $500,000 bond sale for MSA street
construction for 7:30 P.M. to be opened and read a the meeting.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 19, 1988
DATE
Discussion Items
Engineering
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO. Revision to Developmen
Contract 4h. BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the review of the
development contracts to include an insurance provision.
Bill Hawkins will discuss.
Enclosure - Copy of Development Contract insurance page
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
.. .I. -.I. -- --... ..------.-
10. INSURANCE. Developer shall take out and maintain
until six (6) months after the City has accepted the private
improvements, public liability and property damage insurance
covering personal property, including death, and claims for
property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or
the work of his subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly
employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death
shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no/lOO
($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no/100
($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property
damage shall be not less than Two Hundred Thousand and no/lOO
($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination
single limit policy of One Million and no/100 ($1,000,000.00)
Dollars or more. The Ci ty shall be named as an addi tional
insured on the pOlicy, and the Developer shall file with the
City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing
the plat. The certificate shall provide that the Ci ty must be
given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation
of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any dis-
claimer for failure to give the required notice.
o
,
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Discussion Items
DATE July 19, 1988
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
FOR
ITEM Request Public Hearing
NQ on High Risk Sexual
Conduct Ordinance 4.i. BY: Oar 1 D. More
Planning
The City Council is requested to discuss requesting the Planning
Commission to hold a public hearing on adoption of a High Risk
Sexual Conduct Ordinance similar to the one adopted by the City
of Minneapolis (see attached).
The Planning Commission has discussed this matter on numerous
occasions and has decided not to consider adoption of this
ordinance at this time for the following reasons:
1. There currently exists a lack of concrete evidence that
high risk sexual conduct is taking place at Vapors, the
City's only establishment that currently would fall under
the provisions of this ordinance.
2. It was felt that it would be prudent and wise to await
the outcome of the current litigation against the
Minneapolis ordinance and a similar ordinance adopted by
Marion County, Indiana (on which the Minneapolis
ordinance is patterned). This sentiment was affirmed by
City Attorney Hawkins as well.
The Planning Commission is recommending an amendment to Ordinance
8, the Zoning Ordinance, which would excluded adult movie
theatres, bookstores, cabarets, massage parlors and saunas from
all districts in the city. This Ordinance 8 amendment will come
before the City Council on August 2, 1988.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
.',.
"
o
o
df-z.
I . J.
(!. /1 (.1.F ! t.:. r
2/t
7;//e /~
Amending Section 219 of the Minneapolis
Code of Ordinances relating to
contagious diseases
ARTICLE V. High Risk Sexual Conduct
That Section 219 of the above entitled ordinance be amended
to read as follows:
5219.500
FINDINGS.
It is hereby found that there are
within the City of Minneapolis commercial premises, buildings and
structures, or parts thereof, which, by reason of the design and
use of such premises, buildings or structures
are conducive to
the
spread of communicable disease of danger
to persons
frequenting such premises, buildings and structures, and to the
public health, safety and welfare of the community. The health,
safety and welfare of all persons in the City of Minneapolis must
be protected
through the application and enforcement of
standards regulating such premises, buildings and structures, in
order to eliminate the possibility of the spread of, or infection
by, contagious disease.
The sexually transmittable disease of
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, currently found to be
irreversible and uniformly fatal, is found to be of particular
danger to persons in this community.
The incidence of
this
disease is found to occur in discernible population groups.
The'
.'
o
o
risk factors for obtaining or spreading the disease are
associated with high-risk sexual conduct. The commercial
premises, buildings and structures where persons are placed at
risk of infection from this disease or other communicable
diseases facilitated by their design or use for high-risk sexual
conduct are in need of regulation, and of establishment of
minimal standards for the prevention of the spread of this
disease and other communicable diseases for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare of the community.
~2l9.5l0 DEFINITIONS.
(1) The term "high risk sexual conduct" means:
(a) fellatio1
(b) anal intercourse1
(c) vaginal intercourse with persons who engage in
sexual acts in exchange for money.
(2) The term "hazardous site" means any commercial premises
building or structure, or any part thereof, which is a site of
high risk sexual conduct.
(3) The phrase "booths, stalls, or partitioned portions of
a room or individual rooms" means: (a) enclosures specifically
offered to persons for a fee or as an incident to performing high
risk sexual conduct1 or (b) enclosures which are part 'of a
business operated on the premises which offers movies or other
entertainment to be viewed within the enclosure, including
enclosures wherein movies or other entertainment is dispensed
for a fee. The" phrase "booths, stalls, or partitioned portions
of a room or individual rooms" does not mean enclosures which
.'
o are private offices used by the owners, managers, or persons
employed on the premises for attending to the tasks of their
employment, and which are not held out to the public or members
of the establishment for hire or for a fee or for the purpose of
viewing movies or other entertainment for a fee, and are not open
to any persons other than employees.
(4) The phrase "doors, curtains or portal partitions" means
full, complete, nontransparent closure devices through which one
cannot see or view activity taking place within the enclosure.
(5) The phrase "open to an adjacent public room so that the
area inside is visible to persons in the adjacent public room"
means either the absence of. any "door, curtain or portal
partition" or a door or other device which is made of clear,
transparent material such as glass, p1exig1ass or other similar
material meeting building code and safety standards, which
permits the activity inside the enclosure to be viewed or seen by
persons outside the enclosure.
(6) The words "Commissioner of Health" mean the City of
Minneapolis Commissioner of Health.
S2l9.520 BUILDING STANDARDS.
(1) No commercial building, structure, premises or
part
thereof, or facilities therein, shall be so constructed, used,
designed or operated for
the purpose of engaging in, or
o
permitting persons to engage in, sexual activities which include
high-risk sexual conduct.
(2) No person shall own, operate, manage, rent, lease, or
exercise control of any commercial building, structure, premises,
or portion or part thereof, which contains:
o
o
.'
(a) Partitions between subdivisions of a room, portion or
part of a building, structure or premises having an aperture
which is designed or constructed to facilitate sexual activity
between persons on either side of the partition.
(b) Booths, stalls, or partitioned portions of a room, or,
individual rooms, used for the viewing of motion pictures or
other forms of entertainment, having doors, curtains or portal
partitions, unless such booths, stalls, partitioned portions of a
room, or individual rooms so used shall have at least one side
open to an adjacent public room so that the area inside is
visible to persons in the adjacent public room. Such areas shall
be lighted in a manner that the persons in the areas used for
viewing motion pictures or other forms of entertainment are
visible from the adjacent public rooms, but such lighting shall
not be of such intensity as to prevent the viewing of the motion
pictures or other offered entertainment.
(3)The standards as set forth in this section shall not
apply to buildings, structures and premises which are lawfully
operating as hotels, motels, apartment complexes, condominiums
or rooming houses.
S2l9.530 POWERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH.
(1) In exercising powers conferred by this or any other
section of thiS Code relating to communicable diseases, the
Board of Health and the Commissioner of Health shall be guided by
the most recent instructions, opinions and guidelines of the
Center for Disease Control of the united States Department of
Health and Human Services which relate to the spread of
o
o
"
infectious diseases. Any regulations which are adopted by the
Board of Health which relate to controlling the spread of
infectious diseases shall also apply in exercising the powers
authorized by this code.
(2) In order to ascertain the source of infection and
reduce its spread, the Commissioner of Health, and persons under
the Commissioner's direction and control, shall have full power
and author i ty to inspect or cause to be inspected, and to issue
orders regarding any commercial building, structure or premises,
or any part thereof, which may be a site of high risk sexual
conduct. If the Commissioner of Health determines that a
hazardous site exists, the Commissioner of Health shall declare
it to be a public health hazard and public health nuisance and
shall then:
(I) Notify the management, owner or tenant of the
premises that the Commissioner has reasonable belief that the
premises, building or structure is a hazardous site.
(2) Issue warnings to the management, owner or
tenant of the premises stating the reasons for the Commissioner's
belief that the premises, building, or structure is a hazardous
site.
(3) Once
issued, the Commissioner,
proceed as follows:
such notice and warnings have been
or the commissioner's appointee shall
(a) After the management, owner or tenant of
the premises has been notified in writing as to the basis of the
Commissioner's determination, the management, owner or tenant
.'
o
o
, .
shall have ten (10) days to request a hearing before the
Commissioner or the commissioner's appointee for a determination
as to the existence of such hazardous site. If the management,
owner or tenant of the premises does not request a hearing within
ten (10) days of the notice, the Commissioner shall then cause'
the premises to be posted with a warning advising the public that
the premises have been declared a hazardous site. The
Commissioner of Health shall cause orders to be issued to the
management, owner or tenant of the premises constituting the
hazardous site to take corrective measures to prevent. high risk
sexual conduct from taking place within the premises.
(b) If the management, owner or tenant of
the premises requests a hearing, the hearing shall be held before
the Commissioner or the commissioner's appointee at a date not
more than thirty (30) days after demand for a hearing. After
considering all evidence, the Commissioner or the Commissioner's
appointee shall make a determination as to whether the premises
constitute a hazardous site. The Commissioner shall then issue
a decision based upon all evidence presented. If the
Commissioner or the Commissioner's appointee makes a
determination that the premises constitute a hazardous site, the
Commissioner shall then issue an order and cause the premises,
building or structure to be posted with a warning advising the
public that the premises have been declared a hazardous site.
(4) If, within thirty (30) days from issuance of
the orders to the management, owner or tenant of the hazardous
site, the Commissioner of Health determines that such corrective
. ~
o
o
measures have not been undertaken, then the Commissioner of
Health may order the abatement of the hazardous site as a public
nuisance, which shall be enforced by mandatory or prohibitory
injunction in a court of competent jurisdictionJ or may secure a
court order for the cl,osure of the premises constituting the
"hazardous site" until the premises, building, or structure is in
compliance with the standards set forth in S2l9.520.
(5) Any person who removes, destroys, or defaces
warnings posted on premises shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
~;
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
July 19, 1988
Planning
APPR~\j FOR
AGEN~
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO. Purchase property in
TIF District 4~j.
BY: Daryl D. Morey
The city Council is requested to consider the request of Clayton
Steffensen to purchase property located at PIN 34-32-24-31-0006
in the City'S Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District (see
attached maps). Mr. Steffensen approached me on July 8, 1988
regarding the possibility of selling this parcel to the City.
The parcel is approximately one acre in size and is located
adjacent to the easternmost boundary of the Andover Commerci~l
park. It is zoned I, Industrial. A note of caution: the site
is in the EPA Study Area and may contain contamination. Also, a
parcel larger than one acre in size would be desirable for
continued commercial, development in this TIF District.
Mr. Steffensen will be present at the meeting to answer any
question you may have.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCil ACTION
SECOND BY
_,_"'~"""~~'~'__""'~V"_' .
... ".~--.-..... ---- -~.-
.___u_n.__ _
...
co co
0>
W ~ ~
..J
0 a: a: <( ii:
::> ct W Q.
CJ <(
LL a: 0 a:
..J .,. <( ~
W CO GJ
<( CO 0
6 d b ~ ,,:
() z "-0 " ...:
Cl a: ~ w <{ ~ >-
lD
Z W :;; J
0 0
<( :2 0 0 w
a:
:2 a: <(
Q.
0 a.. w
a:
() Q.
R' 'n~ ' "U'.'~ 'O^'R ~n.""
,~
o
Y' ; B I'll I
1;:tV' --_______ -- '; Ii 'L- i I ;oil ~I ~ ! i ~ I. I u.... ..---.-----
.--- "~.. I I c::) '~ ~ ~ ~ ._._. _n.n .pu
-- -------------.-. ::-----~=.: .' ~ ,',' 1+-9 -1- w ~ k
i I ~~ ~ <<S - ~
I I ' "," II ~ ~"__ ~ ~ to tl ~ ~~! I"
I ' ! <H,,~~ 1111lI!~ ~ ...(,..~ m ~~il..1 ~
I ". ,~I:.~,,<<~ . ~...~' ~ ...vJ~ ~ ~~ .......~ ~
I . f! ~." 'r.!:! ~ 1 en L en ~ ~lQ lO.
I '''',: ~ .'; ~ ..;:Y. !~ 'II 111(!1" ~ !'~ ~ ~ 1~
I' I'" " '. J I. _ . 1S m
\V+- \ ", P!!II I~ Q::
I .:...' " llll,iij ,!~
,~--:-" <, I pi ~~~' ~
~ J. I ~ ,-~.,.., ffi w' h ~ ~ '"
i 0 ~ I ~ '- - i I ~ i I 51 ~~ i ~
a: I ~ I in ~~ ~~ ffi. 'I
0. I . t ~ 0(:: ~~. ~ ~
I , 'e II I ~ ~ m~ ~', ..
, ,I I"., 1'-.. ":'Ib-'!~' -;.~
_\'I-I~)'ol. .Iq .li,1 -H-H-{ ~ \'dl, !II ., I~'~ . ~_ ~~
~ V' "N' ",all!2LNI ";:- 5 l'l~ ft. I- r=r'FI-!' / ,~
I, - ~~ ~ :bf;~~i':'t ".': ~ lill ~ !! I~ ~'\'I'I' '/~ ''!:!
/A":,?'\; l.~~~'~~~~~...; W ~i I I-!- ~::-;:..rlffir
'/~ '< ~ i\ ....,."... · ffi ~ 'i' 1 '-I .,
~~: ". ,~ ~.r;'. ~f-;- , Ii ! ~ 0 ~ ' 0::, i-;- ~~ . ,
71~~. ["\A- -/-1'1 "~ t~~....~:f-T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~. . :::t~, : . IL.
7~~ '''::V ~ ~l~~~r-;-! ~ I ~ i" ~I i-!-":'I\\ . I-
-;;- z~.. ./..., "5~ ~h '\tj:... ~. i- i I --::- ,..:.l::::::) ..., >-1-
~~8-1+ ql- - - ;1.l.I~. !i ' ~ ~~ i! 'I!j 111 ~,i i!jl ili"ffi'~ I (':-/:1"-r '-'
k !!!!, NNO i~ ~" II i ~~' Ill). '.roT 1"'1'0"''''
~' - ~I'( -I'~ - ~ -1'1\-:0 -1'1+ ' ',,;' :' ~I'~;!;JUi:l :1.1. ,
\1.-1. '.\~ ~_
\"l'\' ,,'., -", ,~ ~ . . /, . . .~~. ,. .,.r:
-\ v: .......:, ,~ L w /' ',-;, '. .
~ ~ . -' -1--- ~ n I ,\. ... . r!- I
~~;;:.;; - _It.., m ~ ./:' '-t-A '
~ - ,.' ~ iJSf!~ ; ~ ".':"7/11'1'[; .l: :FI",
- ~~ - .1-- - 2 ..,.. {T . 'l'I'j. .\.1
~ ~ - ~Jr. - ~ . y ~
~-7.<;: lot] , ~... '- m ' '(..-1./. .1. ~L:i:l.l. L
~~ ~ I" -'-~~'lr-~""li
~
..
~
~
3
\f
CI)
l.tJ
'" I
.,
<.,)
~
..
..
..
.111.-:50-
(6)
o
"
,
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
'.
.~ <2:.5.;;
,
,
"
,
,
I
~
--'
-
"
,
,.
I
.
.
.
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
...
...
,
.-.'-- ...-... ~
,
,-
I
,
J/,/,~tJ
-- --
,
,
,
,
,
,
,.
,
,
"
,-
.
,
". (5)
,
-
'-1...
\
,.
...-- -..
,.-
'2V
.~ ';.u"\'::~'-'- zoa.7C$ '-;-;-1\:'-
._ _ __._.___. ...____ . .~-.-~;:L1tI'.......:
,
,
I
I,
" "')
,/ (1-)
(4!1JO)
.I,me.r f A,.fv.<:
L. iesll1'u!" ~
~
..
~
II
_ o.;w
.....' .L'd.?W'
\66
~
~
~
~
r:
'.
~
~
-----...-
(~)
(-I?bd)
, /.4U
.
,
I
\
,
\
,
(9)
~"ttI
\
I
: I ~
+---1--'1-
...._... I \,
..........
.2#.J'''~
.~t.....-'
,
.
,
I
I
I
.
I
I
\
\
\
,
,
-. .
,
,
,
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
x
'.
, .
-,
...,
I
I
-'
.--
...........
:--.... ...
...
...
--------~.._---
~J~
...
,
,
,
\
,
,
I
,
I
,
,
-
~
~
'"
~
4
(JJ)
(~
&5H)
,
,
,
.
,
.
I
,
.
,
,
\
\
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
"
.
I
,
.
\
I
\
,
,
.
,
\
,
\
.
,
,
LOCATION MAP
/ I
BARB
DUERR
KE-BLVO.-NW1
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
July 19, 1988
Engineering
/(1" \\
BY:Todd J. Haas
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO. Approve
Handica
Sa.
The City Council is requested to install Handicapped Child signs
in the vicinity of 16236 Tulip Street NW.
SEE ATTACHED WARRANTS, LETTER, AND DIAGRAM
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,.:. "'~=~'__"'_ ._.____".._.._.....,~.___. _ ...'"", ""~_"',_",,.J"'.' ,..'_.-'..~"._...;.'-- ..'-'.
o
16 r C.i!I5Gf:- o-UT
elL ~
~ te7-~.~~
May 27, 1988
RI:~~l\~;lD
-
Patrick G. Hanle
16236 Tulip Street N.W.
Andover, ~ll~ 55304
(6l2) 427-6394
CITY OF ,~~l"'''''\fr.p
Dear 'Sirs,
I would like to have handicapped children signs installed.
North and South of 16236 Tulip Street in Andover, for the
below reasons.
!1y son Michael was hospitalized.from a car accident in
January 1985 thru April 1985. He still gets physical therapy
at Washington School in Anoka and Gillette Childrens Hospital
in St. Paul, to improve his balance and leg movements.
Michaels protective response is slower than a normal
eight year olds and his ability to move out of the path of
a speeding car is somewhat hampered.
I realize kids are not supposed to play in the road,
but it happens.
,
You probably realize Tulip Street is a gravel road and
has a speed limit over 30 MP3. People drive recklessly and
speed quite often. Therefore I ask that signs please be
installed. Maybe it will help slow down traffic and save
unneeded injury.
Thank You,
Mr. Patrick G. Hanle
o
0;
-,'
t-_.'~.~'.,;;J~;,:
((j ((2
RECOMMENDED POLICY AND WARRAN~
for
DEAF CHILD AREA
SLOW CHILDREN AT PLAY
BLIND CHILD AREA
WARNING SIGNS
GENERAL:
In following the intentions of the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices, the subject non standard signs should only
be used when deemed absolutely necessary to warn traffic of
existing hazardous conditions created due to limited sight
distance caused by horizontal and/or vertical alignment of
the roadway or other roadway environment conditions.
The use of these warning sign:i- should be kept to a minimum
because: ..
*
No factual evidence has been presented to document
the subject signs success in reducing pedestrian
accidents, ~ehicle operating speeds, or legal liability.
Children should not be encouraged to play within the
the roadway. These signs have long been rejected by
traffic engineers since they are a direct and open
suggestion that this behavior is acceptable.
*
*
If signs encourage parents and children to believe
they have an added degree of protection, which the
signs do not and can not provide, a great disservice
and false sense of security results.
*
Unnecessary use of these warning signs to warn of
normal or non existant conditions tends to breed
disrespect for these signs.
*
Specific standard warning signs for schools, play-
grounds, parks and other recreational facilities are
available for use when clearly justified.
WARRANTS:
Upon rece~vlng a request to install such a warning
sign, an engineering evaluation should be made of the sub-
ject location to determine whether that location warrants
installation of such a warning sign.
'~)
.J
o
J\.\w.\"..UUUII\,...UU.......U. J. V~J,.......) U,J.l"- H(.J.... .&.U,U,,"-.,,:)
r:T
(~.
~;
.I.' ~-O - -
Such warning signs are warranted when the approach visibility
of the subject location is permanently restricted to less
than the required.safe stopping sight distance for the 85th
percentile approach speed of traffic.
85TH PERCENTILE REQUIRED SAFE
APPROACH SPEED STOPPING TIISTANCE
30 MPH 200 FEET
35 " 238 "
40 " 275 "
45 " 312 "
50 " 350 "
.)I
(5)
o
"
IM/'
it)
(4200)
(12)
(i$'oo)
-.:L "
(.3)
.
)
0)
.,
il?~'
"
pz)
'II
-(1J
(~r60)
-~7:uk
"',?
-'/)'.:1,
::; ~
--etJiE"R ~.
SE"q'.l,i
!r
,. . .l6~. ST=-AV.t ,. N'W:-:-
o
@
\
\
\
c
@
t;
....,
",
--",-..;..;..!~' ..._....;..~~_._:;/.~~~-_..+c.--..,'r....._.__.
r"-.__~"'-'~' .-..- ..-,
!""""""
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE .lnly lQ lQAA
AGENDA SECTION
NO. staff, Committee,
Commis i
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~"5~
APPROVED FOR
AGE D11
ITEM
NO. Award Bid/Hawkridge
Park 5b.
BY:Todd J. H
The City Council is requested to award the bid for class V and
clay for Hawkridge Park to Renollett Trucking.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Renollett Trucking
North Pine Aggregate
Burt Kraabel Construction
Cedar Hills Construction
$4829.20
$5733.30
$5846.20
$9015.00
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 19, 1988
DATE
Non-Discussion Items
Engineering
-<i~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
Old Colony Estates
Final Plat Ga.
BV:Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the final plat of
Old Colony Estates.
- The final plat is in conformance with the preliminary plat.
It is recommended that the plat be approved subject to the
following:
1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title opinion.
2. Security to the amount of $2400 to cover legal, engineering,
street sign and installation costs.
3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site
which is to be determined by the City Engineer.
4. Not to be signed by the Mayor or Clerk until there is an
executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost
for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.})
and a contract for improvements awarded.
5. Park dedication to be determined by the City Engineer.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTtON APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF OLD COLONY ESTATES AS BEING
DEVELOPED BY THE GAUGHAN COMPANIES IN SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE
24.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Old
Colony Estates; and
WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of Old Colony
Estates.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the final plat of old Colony Estates
contingent upon receipt of the following:
1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title opinion.
2. Security to the amount of $2400 to cover legal, engineering, street
sign and installation costs.
3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which
is to be determined by the City Engineer.
4. Not to be signed by the Mayor or Clerk until there is an executed
Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the
improvements for the property (streets, utilities, etc.}) and a
contract for improvements awarded.
5. Park dedication to be determined by the City Engineer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
19 , with Councilmen
meeting this
and adopted by the
day of
voting in favor of the resolution,
and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said
resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
ATTEST:
o
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Julv 19, 1988
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO.
Non-D' Engineering
APPROVED FOR
AGE(DA~
ITEM
NO. Accept Easements 88-2
Ward Lake Drive 6b. BY:James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to accept the easement as attached
for 88-2 Ward Lake Drive.
These are the easements as we receive them ftom Bill. They all
must be accepted before the acquisition process is completed.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
I by
W""., .~::=: I
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
I
o Date:
,19~
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Lawrence J. Audette and Margaret Ruth Audette,
husband and wife , Grantor (s),
(marital status)
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
Citv of Andover
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
, Grantee,
under the laws of Mi nnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
See reverse side for complete legal.
(.if more space is needed, continue on back)
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
~~-<~ ,~~~,~.
~wrence . iiJii et e
,,\ ; "if,"d "T:,:.; ~t:)tnp H(~r('
7)ltVLc7 ~,,( r:vith c2c L t!-tze.~
Margiret Ruth Audette
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ~
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of
by Lawrence J. Audette and Mar aret Ruth Audette
} S5.
,1~,
and wife
, Grantor (s).
eTtlOtMt... AUDITTI ' :
."MY~."'''lg".
. MOICA COUNTY
.., CUmllllll" EICIl* Now. 7. _.
Tax Statements tor the real property described in this Instrument should
be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee):
Lawrence J. Audette and
Ruth Audette
1364 Ward Lake Drive
Andover, MN 55304
Margaret:
I
,
i
I
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS):
o
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
o
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
Jul 19, 1988
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
Engineering
ITEM
NO. Award Bid 88-1
Crosstown Blvd.
6c.
BY:James E. Schrantz
FOR
The City Council is requested to approve the resolutio
the bid for 88-1 Crosstown Boulevard.
Bids are being taken Friday, July 15th at 9:00 A.M.
Bid tabulations will be distributed at the meeting.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
OF PROJECT NO. 88-1 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD FOR STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE
CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council
Resolution No. 143-88, bids were received, opened and tabulated
according to law for Project No. 88-1, with results as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with in the amount of
$ for construction of Improvement Project No.
for construction in the area of ; and
direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with
their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the
next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been
executed and bond require~ents met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
day of
, 19
Meeting this
with Councilmen
voting in favor
of the resolution, and COancilmen
votin9
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
DATE
July 19, 1988
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
Engineering
ITEM
NQ Approve Plans & Specs;
Order Ad for Bid 6d BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the Plans
order the ad for bid for the following projects:
88-8 Old Colony Estates
88-13 Creekhaven
88-17 Red Oaks Manor 5th
88-21 Northwoods Tennis Court
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
FOR
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-8, FOR OLD COLONY ESTATES
FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE
CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 123-88, adopted by the City
Council on the 7th day of June, 1988, TKDA has prepared final plans
and specifications for Project 88-8 for the improvements1 and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to
the City Council for their review on the 19th day of July, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andove~, to
hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications for Project No. 88-
8 improvements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened August 12, 1988.,
at 9:00 A.M. at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted
day of
by the City Council at a
Meeting this
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting favor of the resolution and
Councilmen
voting against same
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-13, FOR CREEKHAVEN FOR
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 122~88, adopted by the City
Council on the 7th day of June, 1988, TKDA has prepared final plans
and specifications for Project 88-13 for the improvements; and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to
the City Council for their review on the 19th day of July, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andove~ to
hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications for Project No. 88-
13 improvements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL~ED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened August 12, 1988, at 9:30
A.M. at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
by the City Council at a
and adopted
day of
Meeting' this
, 19 , with Councilmen
Councilmen
voting favor of the resolution and
voting against same
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-17, RED OAKS MANOR 5TH FOR
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 140-88, adopted by the City
Council 6n the 21st day of June, 1988, TKDA has prepared final plans
and specifications for Project 88-17 for the improvements; and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to
the City Council for their review on the 19th day of July, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications for project No. 88-
17 impr0vements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL~ED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened August 12, 1988, at
10:00 A.M., at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
by the City Council at a
and adopted
day of
Meeting this
, 19 , with Councilmen
Councilmen
voting favor of the resolution and
voting against same
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-21, FOR TENNIS COURT
CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council action TKDA has prepared final
plans and specifications for Project 88-21 Tennis Court construction.
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to
the City Council for their review on the 19th day of July, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R~SOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final plans and Specifications for Project No. 88-
21 construction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened August 12, 1988,
at 10:00 A.M. at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
by the City Council at a
and adopted
day of
Meeting this
, 19 , with Councilmen
Councilmen
voting favor of the resolution and
voting against same
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Jerry Windschitl - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE JulV 19, 1988
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
A
rbval of Minutes
Administration
ITEM
NO.
7.
BY:V. Yolk
The City Council is Requested to approve the following minutes:
July 5, 1988
Regular Meeting
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY