Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC July 19, 1988 r ._~~!'!'_II'?':,~.ll':"I\'I'::,(1~.!..~ CLAIM E.~~~~~le~".!.".Ynlfo~,!, Conveyancing Blanks Individual (s) to Corporation or Partnership " Miller.Davis Co., Minneapolis No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 County Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: ,19~ (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, William R. Anderson and June I. Anderson, husband and wife , Grantor (s), (marital status) hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to City of Andover , Grantee, a municipal corporation real property in Anoka under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, ~l, 1 lam ~0L-)""-._ ~- ~ci1:2-L'4(! '1/1. J ne I. Anderson Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF /JA4JJ::,4 ss, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this } >T day of 3lJl Y by William R. Anderson and June Anderson, husband )lAfv\/'t "VV\!\^lV",V\AI\!\^MI'v'\NVVV~ \I\"I'./,^^. S A JAMES E. SCHRANTZ \ <:f~Att NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA i~ ANOKA COUNTY MY,Commission ExpiresJUL Y 91991 'WIl- li< , 19JUL., wife , Grantor (s). NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) L. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS): William R. Anderson and June I. Anderson 1452 Ward Lake Drive Andover, MN 55304 Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978) MiIler.Oavis Co., Minneapolis / Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Individual (s) .to Corporation or Partnership No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No, ,19 by STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to a municipal corporation real property in Anoka County Auditor Deputy ,19~ (reserved for recording data) Paul S. Miller and Kathleen R. Miller husband and wife , Grantor (s), (marital status) City of Andover , Grantee, under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belon~..g ~ ' 1,Qa aul Miller' \ffix Dppd Tax Stamp IJere STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF J1/1/6/<11 } ss, ~~,~h0/LLV K thleen R. Miller' . -'PI The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ by Paul S. Miller and Kathleen R. Miller. ..NvV'tV\JVV\IIA",/~\Mj\JV, '.A",VlM. JAMES E. SCHRANTZ , NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOT~ ANOKA COUNTY MyCommission ExpiresJUlY91991 vvv. Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., Coon Rapids, MN 55433 #101 day of dv2- y husband , 19---8Jl, Paul S. Miller and Kathleen R. Miller 1519 Ward Lake Drive Andover, MN 55304 - -~i A perpetual easement for drainage purposes described over that part of the Northwest Quarterof Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Ran~e 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, thence East along the North line of said Southwest Quarter 736 feetJ thence North at right angles 10 feet to the point of beginningJ thence continuing North 38 feetJ thence East 20 feet parallel with the North line of said Southwest QuarterJ thence South 38 feetJ thence West parallel with the North line of the Southwest Quarter to the point of beginning and thus terminating. A temporary easement for construction purposes to terminate on September 1, 1989, over that part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southwest corner of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, MinnesotaJ thence East along the North line of said Southwest Quarter 721 feetJ thence North at right angles 10 feet to the point of beginningJ thence North 100 at right angles feetJ thence East 50 feet parallel with the North line of said Southwest QuarterJ thence South 100 at right angles feetJ thence West parallel with the North line of the Southwest Quarter to the point of beginning and thus terminating. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Andover, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, has accepted on 19 , the above described easement in this document. Da ted: , 19_. CITY OF ANDOVER (SEAL) By Victoria Volk, Clerk THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE ANOKA COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. SECTION 386.77. - Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Individual (s) to C,,;p"r~ti,,~~-"~""-- or Partnership Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978) Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 County Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: , 19 JilL (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Michael Donn King and Maria T. King, husband and wife (marital status) , Grantor (s), hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to City of Andover , Grantee, a municipal corporation real property in Anoka under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00 feet of the following described property: The South 330.00 feet of the East 416.00 feet of the West 2216.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, as measured along the West and South lines of said Northwest Quarter, according to the united States Government Survey thereof and situate in Anoka County, Minnesota. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging theret I -;4 ?? Michael Affix Deed Tax Stamp IJere STATE OF MINNESOTA } ss, COUNTY OF Donn King '11~ d ~ Maria T. King, , ~ , . ..~ .,.-' ' .' y:;, .. ,.' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by. Michael Donn Fjin9'"and :Maria T. Kino. husband and wife "NOTARIAL STAMP'OR!lEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) ~~i",\ TRIX G. BECKERS , .!lA-\? NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA \~n~' HENNEPIN COUNty .. ...... My C6m~i$~jon Exp.re~ Nov 30. 1992 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS): Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 , 19..JUL, , Grantor (s). Tax Statements for the real property described In this Instrument should be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee): Michael Donn King and Maria T. King ]7714 YR110w PinR StrpPT Andovp-r, MN SS104 7':3 J26/ I I I I I Form No. 28.M-CUIT CLAIM DEED, Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978) I ndividual (~)"to C~~p~~ti~~~~~^'~">-~~~----""-"""~"~~'; ,-~._,~,~. or Partnership Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 County Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: , 19 .!!L (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Paul S. Miller and Kathleen husband and wife (marital status) R. Miller, , Grantor (s), hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to City of Andover , Grantee, a municipal corporation real property in Anoka under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the South 330.00 feet of the West 800.00 feet of the South- ! west Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24,1 Anoka County, Minnesota, as measured along the South and West lines thereof which lies Easterly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of the ! above described Tract distant 315.00 feet East along said South line from' the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the North line of the above described tract distant 452.50 feet East along said North line from the Northwest corner thereof and there terminating. (if more space is needed, continue n back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging the et AJ'flx De{~d Tax Stamp Here -Jc& :HlUJJJA--/f- ~\I fLy- Kathleen R. Miller STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF .1A}qKIJ- } ~, 5~ day of -J1;z.- Y' husband and wife , 19--.!UL, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by , 1 e R. Miller .__ _'.om.... _.__...m ......-..,._..... NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) , Grantor (s), LEDGMENT '/I.MJ,,^~,,^^MMMN\J\/\N~ '\AI\,V,^^. JAMES E. SCHRANTZ , NOTARY PUBLIC - ~tiNNEsom ANOKA COUNTY MyCommission ExpiresJULY91991 )(~/VVV\i\^N" T' x Statements for the real property describe be sent to (Include name and address of Grante i I ! I I I i I I I I I .. _,~.._,...._.__.____,..,_,..._._,.,...,_..__,.._.... J Andover, HN 55304 Paul S. Miller and Kathleen R. Miller 1519 Ward Lake Drive Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 f_l'"r"'.-"''':~~',M~ ::Cl~~"!"..C L~~_I).E:E 0 ~___,___~_inn,e~"t.a ~n~~~ c:onveyaneing Blanks (1978) I Individual (s) to Corporation i or Partnership I I I I I I I I I I I I Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 County Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: 19 88 , - FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, (reserved for recording data) Dennis M. Flaata and Marcene K. Flaata, husband and wife , Grantor (s), (marital stalus) hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to City of Andover , Grantee, a municipal corporation real property in Anoka under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00 feet of the following described property: The South 330.00 feet of the East 400.00 feet of the West 1800.00 feet of \ the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, as measured along the West and South lines of said Northwest Quarter. Subject to an easement for road purposes over the West 33.00 feet thereof and also subject to the right-of-way of Ward Lake Drive as it is now laid out and travelled along the South line of said Northwest Quarter, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, ~tAU~ ~ . ~~~ Dennis M. Flaata Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here ~~~ y~ Marcene K. Flaata STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ~.L1: } ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z'5-tff day of 7n1?~ by Dennis M. Flaata and Marcene K. Flaata. husband and ife , 19.JUL, , Grantor (s). d"l-(~,' r;:?, u_~ SIGNATVRE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT . . I/~";;.~ SHIRLEY A. CLINTON ~ ~t~~NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA ~ ANOKA COUNTY My Commission Expires Ocl. 12. 1990 I .~V'V\/.,I~ Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee): Dennis M. Flaata and Marcene K. Flaata 17715 Bluebird Street Andover, MN 55304 Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis Forlt1.!'I~._~s.,:!'!I_::(l'::'I.!.. CL~!M ~~ E 0 _~_____~,ll1.rle.:'otalJ".l.'o.::'.:~ol1.~eY aneing Blanks (1978) Individual (s) to Corporation or Partnership No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 County Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: ,19 JlJL (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Wendell D. Emmans and Sarah J. Emmans. husband and wife ,Grantor (s), (marital status) hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to citv of Andover , Grantee, a municipal corporation real property in Anoka under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if more space is needed, continue on back) ~ together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging f)1eie~~ /7C to~ tV >};(~/'~~ Wendell D. Emmans .,L. f.. Q, t"'~M' Sarah J. Emmans The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by Wendell ~ Fmm~n~ ~nn S~r~h T Rmm~n~, Affix Del'd Tax Stamp lIere STATE OF MINNESOTA II /J 0 I<A- } ss, COUNTY OF 7lM,.,jI.,'ANvV'"V ,,^^flJ\.'\f..,,\.'\"'^MAf'. \lv'..V,^^. JAMES E. SCHRANTZ ~ NOTA,RY PU,8UC - M,iNllEsom ?, f,Not,1\ COUI'ITY -> MyCommis:;ion [\i,1f']sJULY919tn ~ )C:VVVVV'\lVVVVV'/V',iWV'v'V'V\NVWv"\i'lV"'iVVV:t THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS): Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 24- -rft. day of ,;1;111/ nllc:h~nrl rlnn WiT,::lo ,19~, Wendell D. Emmans and Sarah J. Emmans 1412 Ward Lake Drive Andover, MN 55304 Miller.Oavis Co., MInneapolis Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978) r--"~I ~divid~;IT~)t; c~;p;;;~ti~-~-----_."_.,-".,-,~,,._,.."~._-~._,_. '-'.- .,_..,-,,~..- .-. .... I o:~r:::::uent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate I', of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. I ,19 ! I I , I I I I i I by STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Dat~ FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to a municipal corporation real property in Anoka County Auditor Deputy 19 88 , - (reserved for recording data) Lawrence J. Audette and Margaret Ruth Audette, husband and wife , Grantor (s), (marital status) City of Andover , Grantee, under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, l~~ 5/-U~zJ2~ , Lawrence ~. Audette Affix Deed Tax Stamp lIen' STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF a~ } ss, /):(k~~Y !( uI:k tt.1. c! &7iz Ma garet Ruth Audette The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .;(,2 ~ day of 7?lGZ,V- by Lawrence J. Audette and Marqaret Ruth Audette. husband and . . Ii)?'.~ SHIRlEY A. ClINTON I ~ " NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA . ANOKA COUNTY My Commission Expires oct. 12. 1990 . . .---_... THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS): Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 ,19~, wife , Grantor (s), du/v&<.-? 0, rh~ SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to (Include name and address ot Grantee): Lawrence J. Audette and Margaret Ruth Audette 1364 Ward Lake Drive Andover. MN 55304 Form No, 28.M-aUIT CLAIM DEED r--..-----.. ______,_n Individual (s) to Corporation Dr Partnership i I I I , Minnesota Uniform Conyeyenelns Blanks (197S) Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 ----I I i County Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: ,19~ (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Garrett M. Heltemes and Judith E. Heltemes. husband and wife ,Grantor(s), (marital statusl hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to Ci tv of Andover , Grantee, a municipal corporation real property in Anoka under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the South 330.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying East of the West 2216.00 feet thereof as measured along the West and South lines, respec- tively, of said Northwest Quarter. Reserving an easement for road purposes over the West 33.00 feet thereof and also subject to the right-of-way of Ward Lake Drive as it is now laid out and travelled along the South line of said Northwest Quarter. Reserving an easement for utilities over the West 43.00 feet thereof. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging the]. , QIlAtt{7n.. 7lc1o~= Garrett M. Heltemes .\ fflx U(,l'd Tax :~tarnp lien' 9!:Ld~ ~~;J Judith E. Heltemes STATE OF MINNESOTA ANO k-4- } Y. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by Garrett M. Heltemes and Judith E. Heltemes, husband and wife , 19-IDL, , Grantor (s). ..,- NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) I I t i "..,.._1 )lMM~MAM" JAMES E. SCHRANTZ I NOTARY PUBLIC" MINNESOTA . ANOKA COUNTY MyCommission ExpiresJUlY91991 YVV" ax Statementl tor the real property de.cribe be .ent to (Include name and addle.. of Or II ...-_... ....-.-".- ....----. -.-. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS): i I I i I Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Garrett M. Heltemes and Judith E. Heltemes 17715 Yellow Pine Street Andover, MN 55304 U01 i I I I i___,_ I L._..._..___~_____ I ._.._____._.._..,.-J Form ,~?:.,2,~:/In::l!.lJ!!,c::!:AIMI?~~__.,_~~nnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978) Individual (5) to Corporation or Partnership MiUer~Davis Co.. Minneapolis No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 County Auditor by STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: Deputy ,19~ (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, William R. Anderson and June I. husband and wife (marital status) Anderson. , Grantor (s), hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to City of Andover , Grantee, a municipal corporation real property in Anoka under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging t e (0. Affix Deed Tax Stamp lIere STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF f}dt/OKtr } ss. ~ 1, CL.Ju,"" June I. Anderson J vt; , The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ' 0 day of by William R. Anderson and June I. Anderson, husband JlMr'" V'o/IfINIJIA~^^^M^MNVV\^N'^^^''^^. ~ ~ JAMES E. SCHRANTZ \ ~~d!.illi' NOTARY ,PUBLIC - tl/INNESOTA {~!, ANOt(A COUNTY ~ My CommissIOn Expires JULY 91991 .V'M.~'\lvwvvvvvvvv.......^N. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS): Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 dVn/e- and wife , 19.JUL, , Grantor (s). LEDGMENT Tax Statements for the real property describe be sent to (Include name and address of Grante William R. Anderson and June I. Anderson 1452 Ward Lake Drive Andover, MN 55304 Minnesota Unltonn Conveyanclnl Blanks (1978) Miller-Davis Co.. Minneapolis Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED n;;-diVidUallS) toCorporation ' I ;r Partnership I No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate : of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 by County Auditor Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: ,19~ FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to a municipal corporation real property in Anoka I (reserved for recording data) Manlev F. Maqnuson lmarital stetus) , Grantor (8), City of Andover , Grantee, under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if more space is neaded, continue on beck) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, ;\ ffix Llf~l'd Tax ::Jtarnp Here STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF OA1~~ } ~. If/Lt tf /77' r ~rcc:~u/~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this C'("7.y<'l{ day of >??tzy by Manley F. Ma'i1nllson i NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) 'I I I I . ~~ Ii)~'; SHIRLEY A. CtlNTON ~ " NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA < . ANOKA COUNTY ~ My Commission Expires Oct. 12, l~I}O ;, XWWVVVVVVV'WI/VI/WWIIV'WVWVV":,',' ' """....,..___1 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DaAFTED BY,(NAM'E AND ADDRESS); I , I I Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., Coon Rapids, MN 55433 #101 , I I I ! 1 I ""..,_",.""..J , 1aJUL, , Grantor (s). A:vt/'k t? e&.,..L~ SIGNATURI!;;l:lF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT Tax Statements for the real property described in tbia instrument should be lent to (Include name and addleu of Grantee): Manley F. Magnuson 17900 Ward Lake Drive Andover, MN 55304 I I ! i I I I .."'.._......._.._..,..J Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978) ,.,'''''"'' ~ ....H'~_...p ."~'~__"_ _'~"._..'_"'~._'_ww, Individual (5) to Corporation or Partnership Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 County Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: 1988 , - (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Sylvia M. Britton, single (marital status) , Grantor (s), hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to City of Andover , Grantee, a municipal corporation real property in Anoka under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: A perpetual easement for public roadway purposes across the South 10.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the South 330.00 feet of the West 800.00 feet of the South- west Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, as measured along the South and West lines thereo which lies westerly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of the above described Tract distant 315.00 feet East along said South line from the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the North line of the above described tract distant 452.50 feet East along said North line from the Northwest corner thereof and there terminating. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging ther to. Affix Deed Tax Stamp llere STATE OF MINNESOTA } ss, COUNTY OF Anoka The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by Sylvia M. Britton, single 3rd day of June , 19.J!..!L, NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) IA."~"'AA'~::~Bl~~~~~E~~:'~ ~ ANOKA COUNTY f. My Comm. Exp. 4-28-92 j' X'Y~"f""W"l"~7nVV~."f",~v"'';. .., , Grantor (s), Tax Statements for the real property described In this instrument should be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee): THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (N AME AND ADDRESS): Sylvia M. Britton 17725 Hanson Blvd. N. W. Andover, MN 55304 Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 , '. '16 c:.c. "7/1<1; ?8 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency July 14, 1988 Mr. Alan Van Norman Conestoga Rovers & Associates, Ltd. 651 Colby Drive Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1C2 CANADA Dear Mr. Van Norman: Re: Waste Disposal Engineering Site Response Action Final Design Report The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has completed the review of the Response Action Final Design (RAFD) 'Report dated June 6,1988, and your June 11, 1988, letter regarding the revised landfill cap selection. These submittals for the Waste Disposal Engineering Site (Site) in Andover, Minnesota, were made pursuant to Task E of Section VI of Exhibits A and B to the Response Order by Consent (Order) dated March 27, 1984. Pursuant to Part VII of the Order, the MPCA staff approves the RAFD Report with the following modifications included: Page 7: Section 3.1 Basis of the Design Waste extending beyond the existing property boundaries, between the east definition of the landfill and Hanson Boulevard, shall be moved to the interior of the'landfill in order to properly install the cap. Based on discussions with representatives of the City of Andover and Anoka County, utility work during the past spring confirmed the presence of waste to Hanson Boulevard. This finding goes along with earlier reports that waste was removed during the construction of Hanson Boulevard. Page 8: Section 3.2 Contour Design The existing wetland area southwest of the Site (west of well nest W-23) shall be utilized to receive additional surface water runoff from the cap. In allowing more of the landfill surface runoff to flow towards this wetland, the need to build the slope on the southwestern corner of the cap will be reduced and the size of the proposed retention pond (northwest of the landfill) will also be reduced. The slope reduction on the southwestern corner of the cap will also minimize visual impacts to the residential areas south and southwest of the Site. Phone: 520 Lafayette Road, 51. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Regional Offices' Duluth/BrainerdlDetroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 2 In aaoltlon, any wastes excavated during the installation of the cut-off wall shall be incorporated into the fill and completely covered by the cap. Page 10: Section 3.3 Surface Water Drainage Swales shall be added along the western and southern boundaries (western half) of the cap to reduce the impact on adjacent properties from cap runoff. The swales will allow surface water to flow towards the wetland southwest of well nest W-23 and along the eastern northeastern boundaries of the cap and will discharge to a retention pond northeast of the Site. The size of the proposed retention pond northeast of the landfill shall be reduced to maintain an adequate buffer for the residences along Crosstown Boulevard. In addition, as indicated above, plans for a retention pond northeast of the landfill shall be developed to handle the runoff from the northeastern portion of the cap. The cap contours may have to be redesigned to direct more runoff to the northeastern retention pond and existing southwestern wetlands in order to enable a reduction in the size of the northwestern wetland. Plans 2 and 3 shall be modified to reflect these requirements. Furthermore, additional detailed information is needed to demonstrate that the retention pond(s} will be adequate. Such information, which includes hydraulic capacity of ponds, 100-year storm flow, and residence time of ponds, shall be submitted to the MPCA and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with 30 days following the receipt of thi s 1 etter. MPCA staff recognizes the fact that part of the northeast property is privately owned. The possibility of exchanging the Waste Disposal Engineering property north of Coon Creek for the private property south of Coon Creek is being actively pursued. The fact that this private property is effectively isolated for all practical purposes may make such an exchange attractive. It will also eliminate the need to reduce the wastes in Area 3, as noted on Plan 2. Pages 12-15: Sections 4.0 - 4.2 Landfill Cap - Component Design The substitutions of the 2-foot clay low-permeability layer for the originally proposed lime sludge (as detailed in the June 11, 1988, Addendum) is acceptable. The performance history of a clay-layer is better established than the lime sludge. Page 26: Section 4.3 Sand Drainage Layer A 12-inch drainage layer as originally proposed in the RAFD Report shall be required to ensure adequate drainage above the clay layer in conformance with the Resource Conservation Recovery Act Technical Performance Standards and consistent with the Record of Decision (ROD). The proposal in the June 11, 1988, Addendum is not acceptable. . , '~J ~?J "'. "" ~~ ';o,'~" , :NW'~N"'~';. e ( Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 3 Page 29: Section 4.5 Common Fill Layer Prior to placement, the material for the common fill layer shall be tested to ensure compliance with Anoka County requirements. A testing proposal shall be developed and submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval within 30 days following receipt of this letter. As part of this review, Anoka County comments will be incorporated in the approval of the testing proposal. Page 30: Section 4.6 Topsoil Prior to placement, the material for the topsoil layer shall be tested to ensure compliance with the Anoka County requirements. A testing proposal shall be developed and submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval within 30 days following receipt of this letter. As part of this review, Anoka County comments will be incorporated in the approval of the testing proposal. Page 39: Section 5.2 Extraction Well System Design Monitoring of the Upper Sand below the gray silt shall be required in order to ensure that the extraction system is performing adequately and effectively in preventing off-site contaminant movement. The proposal for the installation of eight extraction wells in the upper part of the Upper Sand aquifer is acceptable. Page 43: Section 6.2.1 Extraction Well Design The extraction wells shall meet the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) requirements. The proposed single check value at the force main connection (Figure 6.1) may not be acceptable to the MDH. Page 48: Section 6.3 Groundwater Treatment System The following details, regarding the treatment system, shall be submitted within 30 days of receipt of this letter for review and approval by the MPCA and EPA: (1 ) (2) (3) (4) (5 ) (6) (7) . tower dimensions (height and diameter) air-flow rates blower rates packer medium plumbing design for tower assembly description of pre-treatment with carbon treatment defcription of operation and maintenance or vapor phase carbon requi rements. This information is required to properly evaluate the effectiveness and the potential impacts of an air stripper assembly. Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 4 In addition, an air quality impact analysis shall be conducted and the results submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval. The analysis shall include a determination of property line air concentrations of each pollutant using either dispersion modeling or actual measurements (if available) and an assessment of potential health impacts resulting.from the emissions. As an alternative to performing an air quality impact analysis, an appropriate air pollution control technology (i.e., carbon absorption, thermal or catalytic oxidation) can be included in the Remedial Action. Applying the control technology will eliminate the need to perform an air quality impact analysis. If the control technology is applied, detailed information regarding the proposed technology shall be submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval 30 days following receipt of this letter. The proposed location of the air stripper shall be changed to minimize impacts (noise, visibility, emissions). A location on the east side of the proposed retention pond is more acceptable. Page 52: Section 6.4 Treated Water Discharge The proposed sewer line north of Coon Creek shall not be used as a discharge point since the line is already at capacity. The ROD calls for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge to Coon Creek following treatment. The ROD specifically discourages a discharge to the sanitary sewer. The City of Andover, in particular, has opposed the option of a sanitary sewer disposal. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has entertained such disposals on a short-term basis only and has discouraged any long-term disposal to the sanitary sewer. The only capacity in the area is the sewer line along Hanson Boulevard. Page 66: Section 7.4.3 Backfill Design The results from the second phase of the backfill testing shall be submitted to the MPCA and EPA within 30 days of receipt of this letter. These results, which were to determine the long-term durability of the selected design mix, were not included in the RAFD Report. Page 67: Section 7.5 Groundwater Cut-off Wall Design and Construction The cut-off wall shall have a minimum thickness of 2 feet and not an average thickness of 2 feet. In addition, the proposed backhoe (capable of excavating to depths of 40 feet) or the cut-off wall trench method shall be changed to ensure an adequate keying depth. Such a change is necessary since a portion of the proposed excavation will be as deep as 45 feet. Page 71: Section 7.8 NAPL Monitoring System The Non-Aqurous Phase Liquid (NAPL) monitoring well NW1B, completed at the top of the Red Till and proposed for the northwest corner of the slurry wall, shall be installed midway between boreholes BH-1 and BH-2, since this area corresponds to the lowest elevations in the Red Till surface. .. ""::;:;"-...,......,.~,l'1"';c'" ;<;.;-~:".~'?~;- ,.... Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 5 Page 72: Section 7.9 Operation NAPL removal actions, evaluation of the material and disposal options shall be submitted for MPCA and EPA review and approval within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Page 73: Section 8.0 Institutional Controls Detailed recommendations on limiting off-site development and subsurface development shall be provided in regards to specific activities that may adversely impact or interfere with the Response Actions. These recommendations shall be submitted for MPCA and EPA review and approval within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Page 78: Section 10.0 Monitoring The Response Action monitoring network shall include selected private residential wells. Although such a sampling program need not be identical to that carried out by Anoka County, it should be equivalent to the County program. Representatives of the SW-28 Group, Anoka County, City of Andover, the MPCA, and the EPA should discuss a sampling program prior to developing a specific sampling plan. Page 81: Section 10.2 Additional Monitoring During the first week of operation, the facilities shall be inspected at least daily and weekly thereafter for three months to ensure the mechanical facilities are functioning properly. All mechanical equipment shall be connected to remote monitors (i.e., alarms, warning lights) to alert the local officials of any mechanical operations. Any mechanical failures will be repaired within 48 hours. If there are problems with the integrity or performance of the passive Response Actions (i.e., cap erosion, swale erosion, monitoring wells, gas probes, fence), measures shall be taken within one week to rectify those problems. If all components of the Response Action are functioning properly, the inspection schedule can be cut back to biweekly for one year. At that point, the schedule of inspections shall be reevaluated, based upon one year of performance history. Under the requirements of the Resolution of Disputes provision of the Order, the Respondents have fourteen calendar days from the receipt of this letter and the approval letter of the EPA to notify the EPA and the MPCA Director of any modifications/comments the Respondents believe are inconsistent with the Order. If there are any objections to any comments or modifications, the Respondents, EPA and MPCA have an additional fourteen calendar days to reconcile differences. Once you have an opportunity to review the comments and modifications included in this letter, we believe a meeting would be helpful. We suggest this meeting include the Respondent's Technical Team members, MPCA and EPA staff and representatives from the City of Andover and Anoka County. Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 6 If you have any questions regarding these modifications, feel free to contact Kenneth Haberman (612/296-7399) or Michael Convery (612/296-7353) of the MPCA staff. Please be advised that EPA will provide comments/modifications regarding the RAFD Report in a separate letter. Sincerely, ~ Gerald L. Willet \)- -Commi ssioner GLW:ds ~ ~ cc: The Honorable Natelie Haas Stephen, Anoka County Commissioner The Honorable Gerald Winshitl, Mayor of Andover Margaret Coughlin, Ford Motor Company Carl Meier, Honeywell, Inc. Richard Marchek, UNISYS Corporation Marcia KUll, Bowman & Brooke , Kerry Street, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Robert Hutchinson, Anoka County Jim Schrantz, Andover City Manager '<!' , , ') '4 .I .-' r Neighbors and residents of Andover: A group of your neighbors are convinced the time has come for our city to have it's own police Department. We want improvements in policing. We want our own Police... Andover police. We have contacted some police officers who live in Andover and asked them to tell us how to start a Police Department. These officers are going to present our City Council with a "Proposal" to start the Andover Police Department. WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT... WE NEED YOUR HELP... WRITE A LETTER TO THE COUNCIL, TELL THEM NOW IS THE TIME TO START OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT. Use the attached letter and lend a hand. With the support of our city we can have a great police Department. Committee for a Police Dept. x ~ ci'J <1)1 ,-J f J) ,fJ 0 ~~v, 0 f{~ ~~ QjJ' (# ci . {l'cl t\ '/~ ...~ ~.. Andover City Council City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, Minn. 55304 Mayor and Councilmen: The time has come for the city to start it's own Police Department. Crime is rising and more and more people are moving into Andover every day. If you want to attract business to Andover we need a Police Department. There are lots of good reasons to have a Police Department. You have to get one going now before the costs are too high. Its time our city had it's own police. I support your efforts to start a Police Department in the city of Andover. Signed: Andover, Minn. 55304 10 ce. '~r~g JfI~ ~entmI !?JaUh y~ ~ DNISION OF DONOVAN COMPANIES. INC. 1080 MONTREAL AVE. . ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA !I !I I 16 July 1, 1988 The Honorable Jerry Windschitl Mayor of Andover and city council 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. Anoka, MN 55303 Dear Mayor Windschitl and Council Members: Beginning with bills issued on or after July 1, 1988, North Central Public Service Co. will be decreasing the natural gas rates in your area. This change is necessary to offset a change in the wholesale cost of gas we have received from Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern), our supplier in your service area. Northern's rate change reflects the impact of seasonal and competitive forces in the market demand for gas, as well as Northern's semi-annual adjustment which incorporates changes in the cost Northern pays its suppliers for the transportation of gas. The net result will be a decrease to North Central's Firm customers. North Central will be decreasing all Firm rates for natural gas by 4.30 cents per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) effective with gas usage on and after July 1, 1988. This represents an approximate decrease of $4.71 annually to the average residential space heating customer, or expressed as a percentage of decrease, about (1. 02%) . If you have any questions concerning these adjustments, we will be happy to discuss them with yoq. Very truly yours, NORTH CENTRAL PUBLIC SERVICE CO. Division of Iowa Public Service Company ~ N L",~~ Timothy D. Evanson Rates & Tariffs TDE/es 'M12' . ,To ? TKDA T.OL TZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1893 612/292.4400 FAX 612/292,0083 J u I Y 14, 1 988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Andover, Minnesota Re: HII Is of Bunker Lake Project 87-2 Kensington Estates Proj ect 87-8 Andover, Minnesota Commission Nos. 8806 and 8903 Dear Mayor and Council: Attached Is a bll I from Halvorsen Construction for curb and gutter removal and replacement on the above two referenced projects. The curb and gutter was damaged by builders on the projects driving over the curb before It had cured to a reasonable strength. The developers and builders were notified that damages caused by their operations would be corrected at their expense (see attached letters form TKDA and the City of Andover). The attached bll ling reflects 227 LF of concrete curb and gutter replaced on HII Is of Bunker Lake and 70 LF of concrete curb and gutter replaced on Kensington Estates. At the unit price of $16 per LF for removal and disposal of existing curb, hand pouring replacement curb and restoration of disturbed roadway, the bll I reflects $3,632 for HII Is of Bunker Lake and $1,120 for Kensington Estates. We recommend payment to Halvorsen Construction In the amount of $4,752, with the cost assessed to each benefitting project. JPR:j Enelosure r "'1""" CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (61?L!,5.!?:?1QQ.__, - a -, f(. 'cft ~,', :') ,:+ v September 2, 1987 tf- ,...J ..... ',- -"-~-'--'~' . .- ,'t:; Jerry Windschit1 - Developer 3640 - 152nd Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 ~J~:~"--~-._~:~~~~~::~-:i= ~'.::.'._~~.__._'-:_::-":~:.:::~ ...::...:-2~,~.-:',_,_--::-_,-_,,- -- "_; MI<t:'~ F~ij. 0 :':';';~i;-~~S~ j;;;'V_ RE: Kensington Estates, Concrete Curbing , 0 ACCOUNTING 0 LIBRARY Dear Mr. Windschitl, The City of Andover is concerned about the possibility of vehicles driving on recently poured concrete curbs. The developer, Jerry Windschitl, will be responsible for not allowing any vehicles to drive on the curbing for (7) seven days after the time the curb was poured. After said (7) seven days it is ' recommended that the developer bridge over the curb to eliminate damage to the curb. Broken or damaged curb will be replaced. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, CITY OF ANDOVER /~~~ I Todd J. Haas Assistant City Engine r cc: Jim Schrantz - John Rodeberg " " I- CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 ----.................. t( i'; i ..... f SEP 4. '87 September 2, 1987 &.c ......,J Jerry Green - Developer Hills Inc. 854 East River Road Anoka, MN 55303 ~::~~' RE: Hills of Bunker Lake, Concrete Curbing C Nl.';!: ' i _.-;-~.~~.:~~~;~[ .....9 ACS2~H~T1~ Q WWO"r I ~...- Dear Mr. Green, The City of Andover is concerned about the possibility of vehicles driving on recently poured concrete curbs. The developer, Jerry Green, will be responsible for not allowing any vehicles to drive on the curbing for (7) seven days after the time the curb was poured. After said (7) seven days it is recommended that the developer bridge over the curb to eliminate damage to the curb. Broken or damaged curb will be replaced. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, CITY OF ANDOVER 144~ Todd J. Haas Assistant City Enginee cc: Jim Schrantz - John Rodebera. r TKDA TOL T2. KING. OUVALl. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUllDtNG SAINT PAUl. MINNESOTA 55101 1893 612,- 292.4400 FAX 612- 292 .0083 September 14, 1987 Mr. Jerry Green and Mr . Tony Emmer i ch c/o Hills, Inc. 854 East River Road Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Re: Hil Is of Bunker Lake Project 87-2 Andover, Minnesota Commission No. 8806 Gent I emen: Attached is a letter from Kenko, Inc., regarding potential damage to curb and gutter. on the above referenced project. We agree that the contractor is not liable for damages caused by housing contractors, and have discussed the situation with you on the site and by phone. The City also sent a fetter to you on September 2, 1987. We understand that you are under time constraints relating to the Parade of Homes and house closings and we have tried to respond to al i your requests; however, the extent of the house construction In the project area prior to project completion has and wil I create addItional work for the contractor and for the City. House serv ices and gate val ve boxes have been damaged, Class 5 aggregate has been contaminated and/or disturbed, curb and gutter has been driven on too early and potentially damaged, and extra testing has been done to acce I erate the system's use. We have kept you informed of the situation and have notified you that additional costs are involved that wll I be charged against the project. We wll I continue to cooperate with you to help provide the highest qual ity project at the earliest possible date. We would appreciate it If you would notify the housing contractors of our concerns, as it wif I benefit al I of us to protect the work that has already been completed. Please contact me at 292-4558 if you have any questions or comments. P. E. JPR:j I cc: James Schrantz, City Engineer Dave Almgren, Building Inspection Frank Stone, PublIc Works I' KEIIICI lie. 1894 91el Ave. N. E. Blaine. MN 5S434 Telephone: 61217~510 CONTRACTORS ~ J '87 September 8, 1987 ~ ,-I John RodebUrg.~. Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Assoc., Inc. 2500 American National Bank Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 RE: Hills of Bunker Lake, Project 87-2, Andover, MN. Dear John: .-. .... ~....... \. , ~._..~.. ''': '::-- - --- - ,.- ._, 2J _I; "-. _' . 'J~' .: ;. ;. ~.,' _ . . -..~.... M-O) .,~~:::..,l. 0 ...^~y We note with dismay that builders on this project are driving over newly poured curb almost as fast as it is placed. Under the circumstances we mu~t deny any responsiblity for cracked or broken curbing on the site. Yours Truly, KENKO, INC. '~/j"~/()~ ~ Kaz etley Estimator KB/jrm o OTATEMENT HALVORSON CONSTRUCTION Dave Halvorson 4227 - 165th Avenue N.E. ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55304 ~~ /-f,JN',p (612) 434.78.63 e/fY 0- t Q ^'" .fNJ U fJL r41t;~1( SE IV E. r1 -.-.- TERMS: /-l / 'j , ..',._,~, ::;.~~,-," $ /77';;5,:2 P " ;'.:;...~ ;;~~~;+$rrB~T~~5;;~j"klI~'~J~~t~ PLEASE DETACH ANO RETURN WITH YOUR REMITTANce CHARGES BALANCE FORWARD r> d~ of (jiUvt~ P//4J;;' 7: 3d fJApS 'Xl:;} /, S';: 6,.., HALVORSON CONSTRUCTION ~cy(}W y ~' ~',i;:-' . ,~lf;::~l;' :' ":' , ,~;. . :.:~~. 0;.. :':\ ~.;n~'l; .', .;y.,~ ~. , .'<i~\~.;'~., '~f{" ' .. ;~;"'," .\ji;':;~\' '. .....,J 'i3~,.:}~i~/ ..>:. .r:: . ,?,~i.'.':' , ,.';'" .j.: '~,.;,,: '/.~.: i . . I i .? ,.1..<,00 i i I I, ,. " ~. //:20, () 0 , 7/. J.. 'J- ~. 1/3.2.5 2.~i. 'I ' i 0. PAY LAST AMOUNT IN THIS COLUMN .;~ . '. ;"'~rj: ~: ' ..') ','-:'-. .. '~,. :t\; "/> '., 'r"' ~'i, .-', . ~': i:' ",J. '{. 'IF ~ il :~/~'}:n': ,;',~:'-'~;;;:::~ -ir: ;;iJI" l'~~t [t ~ ., '- MEMORANDUM TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: CITY of ANDOVER CT'I'Y COllNC'TT, RAY SaWADA JULY 15. 1988 ANDOVER FIREWORKS DISPLAY This is the regulations or laws on giving a Fireworks Display. Debbie, the coordinator of the fireworks display, has,also been given a copy of these regulations. It will be up to your decision if you want to follow the regulations or not. If you have any questions, please contact me at city Hall. \ \ < REGULATIONS ABOUT FIREWORKS ARTICLE 78 FIREWORKS BOND FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY REQUIRED Sec. 78.103. The permittee shall furnish a bond or certificate of insurance in an amount deemed adequate by the chief for the payment of all damages which may be caused either to a person or persons or to property be reason of the permitted display and arising from any acts of the permittee, his agents, employees or subcontractors. APPENDIX C SUGGESTED REGULATIONS OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL FOR THE PUBLIC DISPLAY OF FIREWORKS APPLICATION FOR PERMITS 1. Application for permit to operate a display of fireworks in conformance with the terms of .......... of the General Laws of .......... shall be made in writing on forms provided by the State Fire Marshal to the chief of the fire department of the city, own or municipality in or near which the display is to be held. 2. Such application shall set forth: a. The name of the organization sponsoring the display together with the names of persons actually in charge of the firing of the display. b. Evidence of financial responsibility. c. The date and time of day at which the display is to be held. \ . ., . 3. Upon receipt of such application at least 15 days in advance of the date set for this display, the Chief of the Fire Department shall make, or cause to be made, an investigation of the site of the proposed display for the purpose of determining whether the provisions of these regulations are complied with in the case of the particular display. He shall confer with the Chief of the police Department about the application and whether issuance of a permit would be consistent with public safety. Being satisfied that the display is properly lawful, the Chiefs of the police and Fire Departments shall together endorse the application, stating that they approve the display as being in conformance with all parts of the law and with these regulations. Failure to approve the application by either the Fire Chief or police Chief shall be sufficient cause for the state Fire Marshal to deny permit. 4. The application, following endorsement by the Chiefs of the Fire and police Department, shall be sent to the state Fire Marshal who shall then, upon receipt of evidence of financial responsibility as required by law in such cases, issue a nontransferable permit authorizing. ' JAMES P. LAR1':IN ROBERT L. HOF"F"MAN JACK 1'". CALY O. KENNETH LINDGREN ANDREW W. DANIELSON WENDELL R. ANDERSON GERALD H. F'RIEDELL ROBERT B. WHITLOCK ALLAN E. MULLIGAN ROBERT J. HENt-'ESSEY JAMES C. ERICKSON EDWARD J. DRISCOLL JAMES P. MILEY GEt-'E N. F'ULLER DAVID C. SELLEROREN RICHARD,J. KEENAN JOHN D. F'ULLME:R ROBERT E. BOYLE: F'RANK I. HARVE:Y RICHARD A. F'ORSCHLER CHARLES S. MODELL CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN JOHN R. BEATTIE LINDA H. F'ISHER THOMAS P. STOLTMAN STEVEN G. LEVIt-' F'ORREST D. NOWLIN MICHAEL C. JACKMAt-' JOHN E. DIEHL JON S. SWIERZEW5KI THOMAS ..I. F'LYNN JAMES P. QUINN TODD I. F'REEMAN STEPHEN B. SOLOMDN PETER K. BECK JEROME H. KAHNKE SHERRILL OMAN KURETICH GERALD L. SECK JOHN B. LUNDQUIST DAYLE NOLAN THOMAS B. HUMPHREY, .JR. J; LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 TELEPHONE 16121 835-3800 TELECOPIER 16121835-5102 2000 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 16121 338-6610 TELECOPIER [6121 338.1002 NORTH SUBURBAN OFFICE 8990 SPRINGBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433 TELEPHONE 16121 786-7117 TELECOPIER 16121 786-6711 July 13, 1988 Mr. Bill ottensmann City Engineer City of Coon Rapids 1313 Coon Rapids Blvd. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 and ,', ~"A r," l R'" ''''''0 '14 '. J~' ~ ~ l}z t\ \~, t." ~G~~~;9~~-l CITY OF 1\t'JDOVER Mr. James Schrantz City Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Dear Bill and Jim: cc. OAv:/!/Jl:l&/ F'RANCIS E. GIBERSON MICHAEL T. McKIM CHARLES R. WEAVER HERMAN L.TALLE WILLIAM S. BRANDT VINCENT G. ELLA TRACY R. EICHHORN-HICKS ANDREW ..I MITCHELL JOHN A. COTTER" BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILER PAUL B. PLUNKETT AMY OARR GRADY ALAN L. KI LOOW KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN CATHERINE BARNETT WILSON" JEF'FREY C. ANDERSON DANIEL L. BOWLES TODD M. VLATKOVICH TIMOTHY ..I. MeMANUS JILL I. F'RIEDERS GREGORY E. KORSTAD CRAIG A. PETERSON LISA A. GRAY GARY A. RENNEKE THOMAS H. WEAVER SHANNON K. MeCAMBRIDGE: MICHAEL S. COHEN DENISE: M. NORTON GARY A. VAN CLEVE MICHAEL B. BRAMAN JOSEPH W. DICKER JACQUELINE F'. DIETZ GAYLEN L. KNACK ROONEV D. IVES JULIE A. WRASE CHRISTOPHER ..I. HARRISTHAL RONALD M. STARK, JR. SHARON L. BRENNA MARIKAY CANAGA LITZAU OF' COUNSEL JOSEPH GITlS .JOHN A. McHUGH RICHARD A. NORDBYE MLSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN This report is to landfill selection Anoka County. bring you process up-to-date on the which is currently progress of the proceeding in a great deal of activity in the last session which we were very had the Merriam/Nelson Bill passed, it the landfill siting process established by the Metro Council. The Bill involved was the Annual Waste Management Act Amendments and in the Senate was authored by As you know there legislature during concerned with since would have eliminated was the LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN. LTD. Mr. Bill Ottensmann and Mr. James Schrantz July 13, 1988 Page 2 Senator Merriam (Senate File No. 1891) and in the House was authored by Representative Darby Nelson (House File No. 2031) The fact that the provisions regarding the landfill siting process got as far as they did certainly was largely due to the authors of the Bill. Both Senator Merriam and Representative Nelson are held in extremely high regard relative to pollution control issues and as a practical matter, have been the people who have demonstrated more concern for the environment than anyone else in their respective bodies in my opinion. Although certainly both authors had a parochial interest, I am sure that people were aware that there were good reasons why the current landfill siting process is not necessary at this point in time. The Metro Council which, of course, established the siting process and as I earlier mentioned, involved in its implementation, was not aggressive at least in the early stages of the session, although they did come out against the amendments toward the end. The Bill was strongly supported by a number of the landfill and waste disposal interests which were generally looked on as parochial by the legislators and probably did not have too great an impact. You will recall during the session a hearing was held where Darby was accused by some environmentalists of being a tool of BFI and Waste Management because of his sponsorship of the Bill. Obviously, the reaction to this testimony was extremely hostile and in my opinion, worked for the Bill more than against it. One of the issues which was very much involved at least by perception was the question of the two expansions which are now being proposed at Flying Cloud by BPI and Ramsey by Waste Management. There was a genuine concern that if in fact the process were terminated and no future landfills were built, this would create an absolute monopoly for these two companies in the landfill business, particularly BFI. I think there is a general recognition also that the elimination of landfilling by 1990 is going to be extremely difficult to achieve and we probably will need additional landfill space in the fairly near future. Our efforts during the legislative session obviously were to promote the passage of the legislation, but unfortunately the House was not willing to go along with the Senate provisions and the Merriam amendments were not adopted in Conference Committee. We are specifically talking about Section 33 of the Senate Bill. This section repealed among LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN. LTD. Mr. Bill Ottensmann and Mr. James Schrantz July 13, 1988 Page 3 other things, Section 473.149, Subd. 2B, 473.803, Subd. lA, and 473.806 and 473.833. These amendments taken together completely eliminate the siting process under the Waste Management Act. It would be my expectation that the Bill will be introduced again in the '89 session, and I think that lt is very important that we do whatever we can to see that it reaches final passage. I have also attempted to keep in touch with the County, representatives, and also the Metro Council. I have had several conversations with Bob Nethercut who is now the head of the Solid Waste Department for the Council and he has kept me up-to-date on what the Council is doing. It should be mentioned also that certainly the whole area of waste management will again be one of the top legislative items on the Metro Council's agenda. This week I have talked to Bob again as to the funding for the second phase of EIS, and he has indicated to me that the Council has not received a request for the funding for the second phase. As I understand it, they have had a number of discussions with the County and it is possible that they may still have funds remaining from the first phase, although he had expected the request for additional funding sometime ago. I have also had an indication that the preliminary draft of the socioeconomic part of EIS was completed and as you know Bill, I have asked you to see if it was possible to get a copy of that and I gather nothing is available at this time. However, I do think we should continue to push for it. Obviously, a very important issue in the whole siting process is the current capacity and the current estimated capacity of our current landfills. The Metro Council is in the process of coming up with a new report relative to what will be available and Bob Nethercut has indicated that this report will be ready sometime before the Legislative Session in 1989. It is my intention to keep track of that report as it has developed and certainly will keep you informed of their progress. It seems to me that we really are at a very crucial time now with the construction of the Hennepin County and Anoka County facilities which should be going on line in the near future and also the efforts by the various communities and the State to implement LARKIN, HOI"FMAN. DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Mr. Bill Ottensmann and Mr. James Schrantz July 13, 1988 Page 4 their various source reduction programs. Metro Council completes their report, it decrease in the need for future landfill Hopefully when the will indicate a sites. Very truly yours, /'j A L/l~----' Charles R. Weaver, for LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. CRW:tS/ABO P.S. Judd Ebersviller is working on several questions that have been raised including the drilling, but he cannot advise on these until additional information is made available. I have also enclosed a copy of the summary of the Waste Management Act amendments and please give me a call if you have any questions. CRW r7"HOUSE RESEARCH Bill Summary S.F. I H.F. SUBJECT: Waste Management Act Amendments AUTHORS: ' Nelson, D. COMMITTEE: Legislative Commission on Waste Management DATE: 2-1-88 This bill is a collection of amendments to the Waste Management Act. Generally it removes the requirement of separation by a waste generator or during collection in the defmition of recyclable materials; clarifies the duties of the Legislative Commission on Waste Management; broadens some loan and grant programs of the Waste Management Board, ratifies the transfer by the Governor of waste tire and used oil management and grant and loan programs to the Waste Management Board and expands the waste tire programs; deletes the cap on the fee metropolitan counties may place on disposal of solid waste; allows the Pollution Control Agency to recover its costs of determining hazardous substance information for individual parcels of real property; requires tire retailers to accept waste tires; amends earlier appropriations to reflect grant and loan program changes; cancels a planned transfer of money from the Motor Vehicle Transfer Fund to the General Fund; appropriates money to the Board and Agency; and repeals the sunset of the Legislative Commission on Waste Management. Section-by-Section Summary Section 1. Recyclable Materials Definition. Removes the separation "by the generator or during collection" language from the definition of "recyclable materials" for chapter USA. Section 2. Lelrislative Commission on Waste Manal!ement. Clarifies the duties of the legislative commission on waste management. Sections 3-5. Hazardous Waste ProcessinlJ: and Facilities Grants. Amends the Waste Management ~oard's authority to make grants for hazardous waste processing and facilities feasibility studies by making feasibility studies of containment of waste also eligible for grants. Section 6. Waste Processing Facility Loans. Amends the Agriculture and Economic Development Authority's loan program for hazardous waste processing facilities to make industrial waste facilities also eligible for loans. Section 7. Hazardous Waste Grant and Loan PrOl!Tams Reoort. Amends the requirement for the Waste Management Board to evaluate and report to the LCWM on its hazardous waste grant and loan programs by requiring that the report be made biennially. Section 8. Market and Facility Development Grants for Recvclable Materials. Amends the Waste Management Board's grant program for market and facility development for recyclable materials by making market and facility development for compost also eligible for grants. Legislative Analyst: Linda S. Taylor, 2%-8961 Research Department. Minnesota House of Representatives. 600 State Office Building Bill Summary - February 1, 1988 Page 2 Section 9. Waste Tire Mana~ement. Amends the waste tire program by broadening its scope, clarifying which agency is responsible for the program and by adding authority for the Waste Management Board 10 contract with counties for abatement of waste tire nuisances. Section 10. Waste Tire Loans and Grants. Creates a new section to: (a) place the waste tire loan and grant program that was formerly administered by the Economic Development Authority under the Waste Management Board; (b) expand the grant program to cover market development for tire derived products; (c) allow grants to local government for waste tire collection and transportation; (d) authorize the Board to conduct feasibility studies of uses of waste tires and public education on proper waste tire management; and (e) require an annual report by the Board to the LCWM on waste tire management. Section 11. Land Disoosal of Used Oil. Prohibits placement of used oil in or on the land, unless approved by the Pollution Control Agency. Section 12. Used Oil Loans and Grants. Transfers authority to make loans and grants for used oil processing and storage tanks to the Waste Management Board from the Economic Development Authority. Section 13. County Fee on Solid Waste. Deletes the 25 cents per cubic yard limit on the fee a metropolitan county may charge on disposal of mixed municipal solid waste. Section 14. Environmental Ouality Board. Adds the chair of the ,waste management board to membership on the Environmental Quality Board. Section 15. Cost Recovery for Real Property Reviews. Authorizes the Pollution Control Agency to recover its cost from requesters of determining whether a parcel of real property contains hazardous substance and the status of any related agency actions. Section 16. Waste Tires Collection. Requires tire retailers to accept waste tires from each customer in a number equal to the number sold to the customer. Section 17. Approoriations - Market Development for Recyclables. Amends the 1987 appropriation to hc Waste Management Board for market development for recyclables by removing "recyclables" thereby allowing the money to be spent for market development for both recyclables and compost. Section 18. Appropriation - Waste Tires. Amends the 1987 appropriation for cleanup of waste tire dumps to make the money available for the broader waste tire programs in sections 9 and 10. Section 19. Cancellation of Money Transfer. Cancels the July 1, 1988, transfer of $2,925,200 from the Motor Vehicle Transfer Fund to the General Fund. Section 20. Use of Hazardous Waste Site Acquisition Bond Monev. Amends the appropriation to the Waste Management Board of bond money for acquisition of a hazardous waste facility site to delete the amount specified for staff and other costs related to selection and acquisition of the site. . '.. Bill Summary - February 1, 1988 Page 3 Section 21. Appropriations. Subdivision 1. Appropriates $2,200,200 for Waste Tire Management and $525,000 for used oil loans and grants from the Motor Vehicle Transfer Fund to the Waste Management Board. Increases the complement of the Board by 6 persons. Subdivision 2. Appropriates $238,500 to the Pollution Control Agency from the Environmental Response, Compensation, and Compliance Fund for startup costs for the Agency's cost recovery system In Section 15. This appropriation must be repaid to the Fund through the cost recovery system. The complement of the agency is increased by 6 positions, 2 of which are temporary. Section 22. Reoealer. Repeals: Section 115A.14, subdivision 5 - Requires the Legislative Commission on Waste Management to complete a resource recovery facility study by January 1, 1982. Section 115A.14, subdivision 6 - June 30, 1992 expiration date for LCWM Section 115A.90, subdivision 4 - Defmition of "commissioner" for the Waste Tire Program that has been transferred from Energy and Economic Development to the Waste Management Board. Section 116.55 - Waste Tire Recycling Loans and Grants - moved from the Pollution Control Agency to the Board. Section 116M.07, subdivision 14 - Used Oil Loans and Grants - moved from the Economic Development Authority to the Board. Section 23. Effective Date. Sections 9, 10, 15, 18, 19 and 21 are effective the day following enactment. .... ~ ,.... . /8 ce, 7/lo/7cV Minnesota Pollution Control Agency July 14, 1988 . R"" i:-(.;'l:'-f~/-.i: 0' .. I~~ ~l} ~.~ ~ t l~.~ ,1'\" r."-,...'--'-~,..,.~.._..'--l,.. . .. ,< J U LIto' !f1na ' l' ", .J ..)~) r ~- ---...----~..- Mr. Alan Van Norman Conestoga Rovers & Associates, Ltd. 651 Colby Drive Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1C2 CANADA CITY OF ANDOVER Dear Mr. Van Norman: Re: Waste Disposal Engineering Site Response Action Final Design Report The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has completed the review of the Response Action Final Design (RAFD) Report dated June 6, 1988, and your June 11, 1988, letter regarding the revised landfill cap selection. These submittals for the Waste Disposal Engineering Site (Site) in Andover, Minnesota, were made pursuant to Task E of Section VI of Exhibits A and B to the Response Order by Consent (Order) dated March 27, 1984. Pursuant to Part VII of the Order, the MPCA staff approves the RAFD Report with the following modifications included: Page 7: Section 3.1 Basis of the Design Waste extending beyond the existing property boundaries, between the east definition of the landfill and Hanson Boulevard, shall be moved to the interior of the landfill in order to properly install the cap. Based on discussions with representatives of the City of Andover and Anoka County, utility work during the past spring confirmed the presence of waste to Hanson Boulevard. This finding goes along with earlier reports that waste was removed during the construction of Hanson Boulevard. Page 8: Section 3.2 Contour Design The existing wetland area southwest of the Site (west of well nest W-23) shall be utilized to receive additional surface water runoff from the cap. In allowing more of the landfill surface runoff to flow towards this wetland, the need to build the slope on the southwestern corner of the cap will be reduced and the size of the proposed retention pond (northwest of the landfill) will also be reduced. The slope reduction on the southwestern corner of the cap will also minimize visual impacts to the residential areas south and southwest of the Site. Phone: 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Regional Ollices . Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 2 In aooltlon, any wastes excavated during the installation of the cut-off wall shall be incorporated into the fill and completely covered by the cap. Page 10: Section 3.3 Surface Water Drainage Swales shall be added along the western and southern boundaries (western half) of the cap to reduce the impact on adjacent properties from cap runoff. The swales will allow surface water to flow towards the wetland southwest of well nest W-23 and along the eastern northeastern boundaries of the cap and will discharge to a retention pond northeast of the Site. The size of the proposed retention pond northeast of the landfill shall be reduced to maintain an adequate buffer for the residences along Crosstown Boulevard. In addition, as indicated above, plans for a retention pond northeast of the landfill shall be developed to handle the runoff from the northeastern portion of the cap. The cap contours may have to be redesigned to direct more runoff to the northeastern retention pond and existing southwestern wetlands in order to enable a reduction in the size of the northwestern wetland. Plans 2 and 3 shall be modified to reflect these requirements. Furthermore, additional detailed information is needed to demonstrate that the retention pond(s} will be adequate. Such information, which includes hydraulic capacity of ponds, lOG-year storm flow, and residence time of ponds, shall be submitted to the MPCA and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with 30 days following the receipt of thi s 1 etter. MPCA staff recognizes the fact that part of the northeast property is privately owned. The possibility of exchanging the Waste Disposal Engineering property north of Coon Creek for the private property south of Coon Creek is bei ng acti ve ly pursued. The fact that thi s pri vate property is effecti ve ly i so 1 ated for a 11 practi ca 1 purposes may make such an exchange attractive. It will also eliminate the need to reduce the wastes in Area 3, as noted on Plan 2. Pages 12-15: Sections 4.0 - 4.2 Landfill Cap - Component Design The substitutions of the 2-foot clay low-permeability layer for the originally proposed lime sludge (as detailed in the June 11, 1988, Addendum) is acceptable. The performance history of a clay-layer is better established than the lime sludge. Page 26: Section 4.3 Sand Drainage Layer A 12-inch drainage layer as originally proposed in the RAFD Report shall be required to ensure adequate drainage above the clay layer in conformance with the Resource Conservation Recovery Act Technical Performance Standards and consistent with the Record of Decision (ROD). The proposal in the June 11, 1988, Addendum is not acceptable. -- --.-------------- - - .J""Jo .. J~~~W1~~~~ ~~aY'i0~! ~ Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 3 ~.. ~ .'~ Page 29: Section 4.5 Common Fill Layer Prior to placement, the material for the common fill layer shall be tested to ensure compliance with Anoka County requirements. A testing proposal shall be developed and submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval within 30 days following receipt of this letter. As part of this review, Anoka County comments will be incorporated in the approval of the testing proposal. Page 30: Section 4.6 Topsoil Prior to placement, the material for the topsoil layer shall be tested to ensure compliance with the Anoka County requirements. A testing proposal shall be developed and submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval within 30 days following receipt of this letter. As part of this review, Anoka County comments will be incorporated in the approval of the testing proposal. Page 39: Section 5.2 Extraction Well System Design Monitoring of the Upper Sand below the gray silt shall be required in order to ensure that the extraction system is performing adequately and effectively in preventing off-site contaminant movement. The proposal for the installation of eight extraction wells in the upper part of the Upper Sand aquifer is acceptable. Page 43: Section 6.2.1 Extraction Well Design The extraction wells shall meet the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) requirements. The proposed single check value at the force main connection (Figure 6.1) may not be acceptable to the MDH. Page 48: Section 6.3 Groundwater Treatment System The following details, regarding the treatment system, shall be submitted within 30 days of receipt of this letter for review and approval by the MPCA and EPA: (1) tower dimensions (height and diameter) (2) air-flow rates (3) blower rates (4) packer medium (5) plumbing design for tower assembly (6) description of pre-treatment with carbon or vapor phase carbon treatment (7) description of operation and maintenance requirements. This information is required to properly evaluate the effectiveness and the potential impacts of an air stripper assembly. ..,.' Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 4 In addition, an air quality impact analysis shall be conducted and the results submitted to tne MPCA and EPA for review and approval. The analysis shall include a determination of property line air concentrations of each pollutant using either dispersion modeling or actual measurements (if available) and an assessment of potential health impacts resulting 'from the emissions. As an alternative to performing an air quality impact analysis, an appropriate air pollution control technology (i.e., carbon absorption, thermal or catalytic oxidation) can be included in the Remedial Action. Applying the control technology will eliminate the need to perform an air quality impact analysis. If the control technology is applied, detailed information regarding the proposed technology shall be submitted to the MPCA and EPA for review and approval 30 days following receipt of this letter. The proposed location of the air stripper shall be changed to minimize impacts (noise, visibility, emissions). A location on the east side of the proposed retention pond is more acceptable. Page 52: Section 6.4 Treated Water Discharge The proposed sewer line north of Coon Creek shall not be used as a discharge point since the line is already at capacity. The ROD calls for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge to Coon Creek following treatment. The ROD specifically discourages a discharge to the sanitary sewer. The City of Andover, in particular, has opposed the option of a sanitary sewer disposal. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has entertained such disposals on a short-term basis only and has discouraged any long-term disposal to the sanitary sewer. The only capacity in the area is the sewer line along Hanson Boulevard. Page 66: Section 7.4.3 Backfill Design The results from the second phase of the backfill testing shall be submitted to the MPCA and EPA within 30 days of receipt of this letter. These results, which were to determine the long-term durability of the selected design mix, were not included in the RAFD Report. Page 67: Section 7.5 Groundwater Cut-off Wall Design and Construction The cut-off wall shall have a minimum thickness of 2 feet and not an average thickness of 2 feet. In addition, the proposed backhoe (capable of excavating to depths of 40 feet) or the cut-off wall trench method shall be changed to ensure an adequate keying depth. Such a change is necessary since a portion of the proposed excavation will be as deep as 45 feet. Page 71: Section 7.8 NAPL Monitoring System The Non-Aqurous Phase Liquid (NAPL) monitoring well NW1B, completed at the top of the Red Till and proposed for the northwest corner of the slurry wall, shall be installed midway between boreholes BH-1 and BH-2, since this area, corresponds to the lowest elevations in the Red Till surface. '~:~>i~;t:_:;: ,:~~{,:~:;::,-, " \,.~.,.f;~4V"f:~':;l.:~:,; .....<... Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 5 Page 72: Section 7.9 Operation NAPL removal actions, evaluation of the material and disposal options shall be submitted for MPCA and EPA review and approval within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Page 73: Section 8.0 Institutional Controls Detailed recommendations on limiting off-site development and subsurface development shall be provided in regards to specific activities that may adversely impact or interfere with the Response Actions. These recommendations shall be submitted for MPCA and EPA review and approval within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Page 78: Section 10.0 Monitoring The Response Action monitoring network shall include selected private residential wells. Although such a sampling program need not be identical to that carried out by Anoka County, it should be equivalent to the County program. Representatives of the SW-28 Group, Anoka County, City of Andover, the MPCA, and the EPA should discuss a sampling program prior to developing a specific sampling plan. Page 81: Section 10.2 Additional Monitoring During the first week of operation, the facilities shall be inspected at least daily and weekly thereafter for three months to ensure the mechanical facilities are functioning properly. All mechanical equipment shall be connected to remote monitors (i;e., alarms, warning lights) to alert the local officials of any mechanical operations. Any mechanical failures will be repaired within 48 hours. If there are problems with the integrity or performance of the passive Response Actions (i.e., cap erosion, swale erosion, monitoring wells, gas probes, fence), measures shall be taken within one week to rectify those problems. If all components of the Response Action are functioning properly, the inspection schedule can be cut back to biweekly for one year. At that point, the schedule of inspections shall be reevaluated, based upon one year of performance history. Under the requirements of the Resolution of Disputes provision of the Order, the Respondents have fourteen calendar days from the receipt of this letter and the approval letter of the EPA to notify the EPA and the MPCADirector of any modifications/comments the Respondents believe are inconsistent with the Order. If there are any objections to any comments or modifications, the Respondents, EPA and MPCA have an additional fourteen calendar days to reconcile differences. Once you have an opportunity to review the comments and modifications included in this letter, we believe a meeting would be helpful. We suggest this meeting include the Respondent's Technical Team members, MPCA and EPA staff and representatives from the City of Andover and Anoka County. ....>-~ Mr. Alan Van Norman Page 6 If you have any questions regarding these modifications, feel free to contact Kenneth Haberman (612/296-7399) or Michael Convery (612/296-7353) of the MPCA staff. Please be advised that EPA will provide comments/modifications regarding the RAFD Report in a separate letter. Sincerely, ~ ~ ~._ Gerald L. Willet \)- -Commi ss i oner GLW:ds cc: The Honorable Natelie Haas Stephen, Anoka County Commissioner The Honorable Gerald Winshitl, Mayor of Andover Margaret Coughlin, Ford Motor Company Carl Meier, Honeywell, Inc. Richard Marchek, UNISYS Corporation Marcia Kull, Bowman & Brooke Kerry Street, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Robert Hutchinson, Anoka County ,Jim Schrantz, Andover City Manager --- A ~ Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, Sl. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 222-8423 July 13, 1988 ~"~-'I.,;;"('. -to ., ~ R'. '...~ 0'" ; "'. ;. -," ':\ i:~" n", -.' . '" ", .'f " . . ,; I'" '. ~~ ~~ .. "J .~... \.,"' .....,.. \, t.;</;1'J Rr~:~;;~~l ~, .----..........,... To All City Managers: CITY OF ANDOVER (0 cc, I~ ,."::) DIfV'IF yn!gg This letter is to remind you that the SAC refund program is still available to the communities during the remainder of 19~8 and 1989. Please inform the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, by City Council Resolution, as to your community's decision regarding par- ticipation in this program. Under the refund procedure you are to submit your entire list of eli- gible permits for a SAC refund providing the following information: the permit number and date it was issued~ location and type of building~ number of SAC units and amount paid~ and the date it was reported to the Commission. This list should b~ accompanied by your City Council Resolution and a map designating those areas for which you desire to receive a refund. There may be some communities who do not have any eligible units (on-site systems for which SAC had been previously collected). In these cases a written communication from the community indicating that no SAC refund is requested should be submitted to the Commission. If you have any questions, please contact either Mr. Ray Odde or Mr. Donald Bluhm of the Planning Department at 229-2114. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincer~ Peter E. Meintsma Chairman . ~ PEM: SLS: loc cc: MWCC Commissioner J. J. Hiniker, Deputy Administrator Planning File: 19.775 /""" u' . .~~~"" ~'~~ ; ~ ~..~,..I ;f:\.;:' \i .~: ~).~ ..:~ r; "I) t, ~ (~.~.'. ,~~ -2- '1fQV"aber 28, 1972 I ' , cfte before thea on 'their agenda and to make reco..enc1&'tions to Town Board of Supervisors. He contended that the Town Board of Supervisors can either accept recoJlllendation, reject, or send back fer reatudy. He ala. noted that tbose interested should attend meeting in two weeks for the final outcome. Lyle, Bradley noted tha't if' the ma'tter is called up again" the use .f an over- bead transparency would enable 'the audienoe to lIee easier. The lIotion .... carried una.niaously. , The proposed Public Hearing on Backaan addition was .called again and they" were not present. A't 9105, a Public Hearing followed to consider an,8lIlendaent to zoning Ordinance 8, sec'tiOQ 3.02, subsection E, subparagraph 2, Cha1rmanJaworski opened tbis !'tea up to general discussion by the audience. Dick Schneider stated that if the wording of O:rd1nance 8 was changed, it would require 5 acres to own a horae and be felt this would be unfair. Holaaek asked Schneider if he had any alternatives, Schneider thought they abould adept ordinance to control horses. Jones asked 1f' anyone had seen a lIodel of such. Schneider said that Hall Lake has sucb an ordinanoe, Jones ude a lIotion tbe Town Board .f Supervisors rejeot ohange in woming of Ordinance 8 as a way to control horses and to look into a herse ordinance to control the.. Holasek seconded the aotion. There was further discussion on the u.tter. Lyle Bradley stated that as a aeaber of Town Boam, he has received no cOlllplaints en tbis matter. Schneider stated that when he was a aellber of, the boam he did receive several complaints on 2 acre lota. At 9.25 the lIotion was carried J1n&nimously. At 9130 WilliaJ1 Born was called fGr reviewal of possible subdivision Iff lot in track C at approx1u.te1y County Road 7 be'tween.17Jrd" and 175th Avenue. WilliaDa Born was represented by bis father, Lloyd E. Born,and Jeff earson, a,aeaber of Legal Aid Society, earson asked for perait to sell unplatted piece, of land shewn in T.rack C because of severe ham.bip en, the part of Williaa Born. He stated Born did not want to aell, but because of an urgent need of funds it was neceasary. Jones stated that under platting Ordinance 10 the hardship clause pertains to the land only and that it is against state law to sell any land under 5 acres by aeets andbounda. . Lloyd; Born said that his son has a bupr fer one lot nw and that if' he oannot sell. be will have to go 'on welfaro. Johnsen stated that tho way present ordinance is werded he would natly turn tho dew. Jon.. asked if they oeuld not. possibly be interpreting tbe wording wrong. Jones stated be tbought .itwould be fair to have attorney look at _otter te interpret hardship olauso. HoweIt agreed. Chairllian Jaworski told Carson t.. oontact township attorney if ho wanted an interpretation of hamsbip clause at his 81fD C8Illt before, township aeeting. He also suggested he call Marv Christensen ef the T01fn Beard. At 10115 P.M. clRltinued Public Hearing fer BacImaa was again called and was not there. ' At 10115 Public Hearing was called fer CliffltX'd Chapman--rezoning B-1 to R-3. The west t of N.V. t of the S.V. t of section 15, T8lIDShip 32, Range 24 in Anoka ,County, Minneseta. Cha1raan Jaworski stated the rea.son Chapman is requestins rezoning i. becauso his lots do, not .eet 60% of the requirements of. Ol:dinance 8. Bolasek asIted Chapu.n if be had deeds filed -)- Nevember 28, 1972 I on eaoh 10't;. Chapu.n atated be bad dene .. en Dece.ber 31, 1970. ~1aaek allSG stated t.hat in erder t.o .en 60% requlreaent under R-1 hi. lots weuld have te be apprex1Mtely 1 2/) acr... He1aaek..id that 1t it was resened to R-) withCJut a stipulation Chapaan ceu1d build en eveX'J let. Cha~n said he intended to build OIl eve'r7 lot. At 10lJ5 Jehu_ ud.e' a .ot1en te change to R-J with stipulatiOft he weul4 be able te bul14 all en "'fIX'J ether lot. Seoended by Holasek. D1acuaden tell_ed wlth Cha)lUA .,ins thi. was J1II&cceptable. Johns_ requ..terl Jft'II1sdea te 1f1thcb:aw his .ft1ftn. Hela.ek netes because it ... seconded it. cannet be withdrawn. A y........ put _ the motion--2 tor, 4 against. Moti_ net carrled. Clenden1ll8 11&4. a ....1_ t. leave ,lWa &8 R-1 olaas1ficaUen. Secended by Jebne_. :Ch&1raan Jawerak1 noted"Chapu.n'. reason te c-in8 was a cbaap te R-J. 'lbe vete 11&11 2 tor, 2 against, 1 abstention by Dutte. Ch&1raan JaweraId veted te bre&Ic tie, whioh made it J agaiDst, leaving it &8 R-1. At this peint Chapaan backed up and sald he would accept plu JUt terth that he would, be able te build en l!Nery ether lot enly. ~lasek .tat.ed. he wanted. lets te be .. d_1sn&ted &8 to which enea Cha]lll&ft oeu1d bulld n. Jon.. 1II&d. a .ot1en te reo_ern that Town Beam et Supervisors accept r..enlng te R-J with stipulation that only 1!NeJ:y .ther let is bu1ldable. Dutton .ecended.' Only lots B, D, F, H,J, K, L, N, P, R, T, & V shall be desi8o&ted &8 buildable. It is nGted that this infctrJla.t1on sheuld be available to the building inspechr. The vote wa.a 4: far and 1 against. Meeting was adjourned at 10.55. . Mary Kegler, Clerk Planning and Zoning CGIIIlissien ~ i~ MEMORANDUM To: Bill Hawkins, City Attorney From: d'Arcy Bosell In Re: Declare Adequacy of Petition/Uplander Agenda Item No. 7c Date: 7 June 1988 Bill: In November of 1970, the Zoning & Planning Commission of Grow Township approved a subdivision for Clifford Chapman with the caveat that h. could build on every other lot. According to the minutes of the Z & P dated November 14, 1972, no action was ever taken by the Town Board of any kind. The Z & P recommended that Mr. Chapman apply for a rezoning as his request came in after the adoption of the Platting and Zoning Ordinances and that request went before th~ Z & ~ on November 28, 1972. At that meeting the motion was made to "change to R3 with the stipulation he would be able to build only on every other lot." There was considerable discussion apparent in which Mr. Chapman withdrew his request, then remade his request and the Z & P voted in favor on a 4 to 1 vote. The stipulation was that only lots B, 0, F, H, J, K, L, N, P, R, T, and V shall be buildable. At the Town Board meeting of December 12, 1972, the rezoning was brought to them by Clifford Chapman. The City Attorney recommended three courses of action and the Town Board chose to amend Ordinance No.8, Section 7, Permitted Uses to read: "EXCEPT for the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, this shall not apply to lots of record at the time this ordinance is adopted." The motion carried. , Rither made the motion to refer the Clifford Chapman request to 'rezone the above-described property... from R1, Single Family Estate to R3 Single Family Suburban, because it appears the rezoning request should be considered with the proposed amendment of Section 7, Ordinance 8. The motion carried. The records are then silent as to what happened to this request, however, it appears that someone interpreted it to mean that the property was rezoned to R3 as that is the zoning that is carried on the Official Zoning Map. Page Two Agenda Item 7c 7 June 1988 The issue is whether or not the lots are now buildable and capable of casting a vote in regard to the petition for streets. Because Mr. Chapman owns the "unbuildable lots", he can put the kabosh on the whOle project. More importantly, if no action was taken in regard to the subdivision and no action was taken on the rezoning request, did these matters become approved because of the inaction of the Town Board? Attached are the minutes found in this regard. There are no records before or after these minutes that deal with this matter. This will be on the City Council agenda tonight and your consideration is important. ~7 d'Arc<;1 Attac&nfents November 14, 1972 Clifford Ch!31l/1I1':111 ;;1.1'l'GPrl'lr.l h,fnJ:';" t.ho 'fo','m no~u'u I-"bout I;ho '11J1~1J in h1rJ 8ubdlv.Lr:Jlon. It h:'O) h0011 .'l'l'I'OV(Hl 1,):/ thp. ZoniuG T:J,l1d p t"lIll1nG COlnmiS/31on 011 Uovellluul' 2/1. 1 ~'i'O; I; lH.l.l: ho Guuld bu:1.ld all ever;; I .' "t hn r J.o l. 'f,H()1l:\f.~~~i.:m:,::~/a,s.,;"e.Y or '1:Hkon hj' I.Iw 'I'o~"!l1 Dutilrd.f ~S>~.~~~.I1I:~~~~..~.e'3. ,;!<:; 1"3.C h~J; !ted ejldjJ.here:>.)';.B')lO fJ v:l. df.lllC (. I) f tho ~l'OVIU Board. .t.t~ltlllr.r.2il.l1Y H ';",1.' " : ~.:!",.:.Lon.j 'l'ho luts ,'.1'0 undor 'I;ho l".:Jqu i.r(l',l (,07{, of l:lw G1'~mdrlJ.ther r;'I ;.~llfJO, Hili!. I;ho only V1uy now 1u 1;0 tl111'1:i for l'HZon:l.Il~.' 111'. Chaplllv,n :'f,;I;ad if ho could. gol; I'" build.LlIG pCl'l!ri t 1101"17 'I'h01'e 113 110 1I0801bJ.0 vWJ' l1ut:il tho ~l'own Board has'l;nltoll 1.1,\:1;1011. lJe heW I:,pp]j.ed'fur rezon:'.I1G. 'lld the head.ne wIll be on ,'l'uo!:Jday. ~!ov\llllbQr 23, 1972. November 28, 1972 At 10.1.5 Publio llearing _. called. fer Ollrrerd Oh&pIl&n--reunlng R-I, h R-3.'. The "est t e! H.lI'. t er the S.W. t of 81tcUen 1.5, Tnnship :)2, Range 24 in AnekaOeunty, HlnMseta. ChairalUl Jaw.raki stated' the rea_on ,..~haJ?lllll.n is, requeotiDg ,reunlng b becaWle hlsl.ts de not1.eet 6Q%\erthe" \rt'lqulrelllent.a~.ef, Ol:dinano,!, 0' lIe1aaek asked ChaJllll1D if he had deeds filed on eaoh let. Ohap.an stated h_ bad dens se en Deceaber 31, 1970, lIela.ek also stated that Inerder to aee\ 60% rlt'lulreaent under R-l hls lots ,.euld haye te be apprexlaately 1 2/J aores, lIelll.ek ...id th&t, if it ns resened to R-J withclUt a stipulation Chapllan ceuld bulld en every let, Ohaplllln sald he inhnded t. bulld en every let. At 10.J.5 Jehnllen ....d. a ..tien te change to R-J with atipulation h. weuld be abh h build .nl;r sn f/'ter:r ether 101;. Seceoded by lI.laaek. Dlsou..hn relIned with Ohap.an sa;ring thls HaS unacceptable. John.sn X'e'lue.t..t per.leeien t. withdraw hia .etien, lIelaeek neha becaUlle it na aeconded it oannet be "UhdrtUfn. A.yet.,.... put en the ~etl.n--2 fer, 4 against. "otlen net oarried. Olendenln8.-d. a ..ti.n te leavs.aawa as R-l olassificatlon. Seoended by Jehnasn. :Chairaan Jawsraki noted,Ch&paan's re&ll.n fer 0..1118 1fllS a chanS. te R-J, The,vete waa 2 for, 2 against, 1. abat.ntien by Dutten. Chalraan Jawerski veted t. break tie, whlch made it J agalDat, leaying lt as R-l. At thls pelnt Chapaan backed up and said he weuld aocept plan put forth that he would,be able te bulld en every ether let .w.)'. lIelank atated h. wanted letlS t. ~ .. dedgnated as to whloh en". OhaJll&n 0.u1d bulld .n. Jsn.. Mde a .etien t. reo...end tint Town Board e! Supervisors Moept renning tit R-J with ISUpulatlon' that onl)' every .ther let is bulldable. Dutton seoonded. Only lots B, D, F. lI, J, K, L, N, P, H, T, & V shall be des1gnated illS buildable, It is nltted. that thllJ lnferr'''I.i;ion IIheuld be available to the building ll18peotor, The voh was 4 for and 1 agalnst. Meeting was adjourned at 10'55. Mary Kegler, Olerk' Planning and Zoning Ooa~issi.n December 12, 1972 Clifford Chapmall appeared before ~he Board to ask for rezoning' on the West Half of the Northwes~ Quarter of ~he Southwest Quarter of section 15, Township 32, Hange 24, J\noka County, Minnesota, from H I. Single Family Estate, to H 3 single Family Suburban. After discussion, J\ttorney Dabco,ck presented three alternatives for the 'I'own Board to examine: 1. 'I'he '!'ownship could en ter into a con tract wi th Mr. Chapman. 2. J\mend Section 7, Permitted Uses, of Ordinance 8. 3. By placing a covenant on the deeds. Hither questioned what would be the best order to do themI' First would be to amend the ordinance, second to enter a contract and third to put covenants on the deeds. llither presented the following motion: I move that Section 7, Permitted Uses, H 3 Single Family Suburban District of Grow 'l'ownship, Ordinance (J as adopted October 21, 1970, be amended to read:~~~,~!"1-:,[r~or;:_t~~.i'L':ler:;t lIalf...of the Northwest Quarter o(...the SouthwestJ '. ",~' . ,':; " . ~', :.) Q~~~:ter ".of..SecHon'lS ~: 'l'ownship 32, Hange 24, this ,shall not, apply tol }o.~.~.~"of ...~E!!=l~f'~" a t"thEl,,:time this. ordinance is adoPte:ci~,,\ Bradley seconded and thei,m. (!;'f16H catr'ied.. Hither made a motion we refer)the Cl.ifford J ,-.,......-. ... ,.,'., . I , (lx.leL 6:j tiLl> PeltZ g'Y W/7iLC r Chapman r~questtorezone the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, 'l'ownship 32, Hange 24 from H 1, single Family Estate to H 3 Single Family Suburban,. because it appears the rezoning request should be considered with the proposed amendment " of Section 7, Ordinance o. Bradley seconded and motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 8 Section 7.01 Permitted Uses in All Districts R-3 Single Family Suburban District Urban Agricultural Uses Single family residential buildings Private sewer . Pursuant to the Town Board Minutes dated December 12, 1972, Ordinance 8, Section 7, Permitted Uses, R 3 Single Family Suburban District of Grow Townshiup (adopted October 21, 1970, published January 1,. 1971) was to be amended as follows: Except for the West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, this shall not apply to lots of record at the time this ordinance is adopted. The language ,underlined above appears to be a part of that Motion but does not reflect all of the language contained in the Motion. The Minutes should be further researched to see if any clues can be uncovered as to how, when and where this amendment was made, if it was published, etc. . . 6.03 Zoning District Map The boundaries of the DIstricts as established by the ordinance are as shown on the map publis)'led herewith and made part of this ... "t'dinnnce whlcn Is designated as ~ "Zoning District Map", which ,p is properly approved and filed ." Ilh the Grow Township Clerk. The district boundary lines on said map are Intended to follow street rlght- o!.way Hnes. street centerlines, or lot lines unless ::.uch boundary line Is otherwise indicated on the map. In the CD-se of unsubdivlded pro- perty or in any case where street or lot Unes are not used as bound- aries. the. district boundary lines shall be determined by use of di- mensions or the scale appearing on the map. All of the notations. references and ethel' infol'mation shown there. on shall have the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein and are hereby made part of this ordinance by reference and incor- porated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. Section 7-PERMITTED USES 7,01 Within any of the foilowing districts, no structure or land shall be used except lor one 1) or more o,f the uses listed by district: PERMITTED USES IN ALL DISTRICTS Public utlllty uses for local serv.. Ice when located within public right-of-way. All other public utn. lty uses require a special use per. mite PubUc: and private forests and wild life reservations and pUblic parks. Public owned and operated pro.. perty except as herein amended. Public elementary. Junior and . ""lior high schools. 3IDENTIAL R..I Single Family Rural District Agricultural uses. Any site which has more than five (5) non-domestic animals per acre shall require a special use permit. Single family residential struc.. tures. R-Z Single Family Estate District Urban agricultural us.es. Single family residential build- Ings. R-3 Single Family Suburban District Urban Agricultural uses. Single family residential build- ings. Private sewer and water systems shall only be permitted on every other lot or no more frequently than one private system for ~ach 40.000 sq. ft. where large lots are established. This shall not ar,pIY to lots of record at the time th S ordi.. nance Is adopted. On each new plat, the lots to be developed in accord.. ance with this section shall be so designated. R-4 Slnlle Family Urban District Urban agricultural uses. Single family residential build- Ings. Private sewer and water systems l'i:hal1 only be permitted on every i lot or no more frequently It;n:'h<:Je sr:::Z' l~~; ~ar~h e~~~g<! ushed. This shall not apply to lots of record at the time this ordinance is adopted. On each new plat the lots to be developed In accordance with this section shall be so desig- nated. R-5 Manufactured lIousln, DIstrict ( ~{obl1e homes and modular homes provided they are developed under a "planned unit development" and the compiex is a minimum of 20 acres or 50 dwelling units In size. Multiple dwellings shall be per- ~\~ti~s~~dar~U~~~~lo~t G~02d:~~t~s a: part of the planned unit develop.. ment. M-I Multiple Dwelllnl Townhouses not to exceed eight (8) units per building with public sanitary sewer and water service. M-2 ~[ultlple Dwelllnl . Townhouses not to exceed eight (8) units per building at a M..t dis- trict designation with public sani- tary sewer and water service. Multiple dwellings with public sanitary sewer and water service. RECREATIONAL GR General Recreatlon District Golf Courses Motets and hotels Resorts Sporting goods and boat sales In- cluding service and rental Information centers Cafes and restaurants Urban agricultural 7.01 BUSINESS LB Limited BusIness Urban agriculture Medical and dental clinic Business schools G.eneral offices Mortuary or funeral home Rest homes. nursing homes Photo studio Professional offices. clinics and hospitais Churches Radio-television studios NB Neighborhood Buslness Medical Offices and studios Retail shopping Restaurant SC Shopping Center District All uses permitted in uNB" dis- trict GB, General Business District .i\utomoblle agency Research Automobile service except serv- ice staUon (only by special use) Urban agriculture uses Transportation terminal or motor freight terminal Warehousing Wholesale business Medical Olllce. Manufacturing (Umlted) Hotel, Motel Clubs. lodges, Institutions Mortuary and funeral home Farm equipment. sales !outslde operation by special use on y) \ Veterinary clinic or hospital with no outside pen~. INDUSTRIAL LI Limited Industrial District Urban and rural agriculture uses Manufacturing (limited) Medical Offices Research Wholesale business Warehousing PubUc utillly buildings and stor- age Veterinary clinic or hospital with no outside pens Miscellaneous Industry GJ General Industry District Urban and rural agriculture uses Manufacturing (limited and gen4 eral) Medical Offices Research Transportation terminal or motor freight terminal Wholesale business Warehousing Pubilc utilily buildings and stor- age Veterinary clinic or hospital with no outside pens Miscellaneous Industry 7.02 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES With the foilowingg dlslrlcts, the listed uses shall be permitted ac... cessory uses: ACCESSORY USES In Ail Residential Districts Keeping of domestic animals (3 or less except in R...l) Open, off street parking space (not more than 4 vehicles per one and two family homes) Gardening and other horticultural uses Keeping at not more than two boarders or roomers by a resident family with no private cooking facilities Private garages Home occupations meetln" cri.. teria Recrl!ation areas and swimming pools In Ail Multiple Dwelllnl Districts Swimming pools and recreation areas or structures Garages and storage structures for trash or garbage In All Business and Industrial Districts Any Incidental repair, process.. lng. and storage necessary to con- duct a permitted principal use but not to exceed thnty (30) percent of the floor space of the. principal building. , 7.03 SPECIAL USES Special use permits for uses not listed heretn shaH not be granted except where the governing body determines that said uses are sim- Ilar In character to those listed herein. Within any of the following dls- I/,/. ,-./,( . ","'\ L, trlcts, no land 01 structure shall be used for the following uses by districts except by special use per.. mit and in accordance with the crl.. teria as stated In Section 5.03 (B): RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Cemeteries Commercial greenhouse Public utility uses or structures except when located upon public right-of-way Churches Dog kennels In R-l district only Two family homes In R..4 and R-S dlstrlcls oniy Rest homes. nursing homes and hospitals Day nurseries Golf courses Marinas Clubs and lodges RIding stables Colleges and similar Institutions Storage bundlngs for boats. snow- mobiles or similar vehicles in R-5 only Christmas tree sales Highway construction materials (processing and storage) Excavations except :when a build- Ing permit has been Issued MULTIPLE DISTRICTS All uses permitted by special use In Residential Districts except dog kennels. RECREATIONAL DISTRICT GR General Recreation District Outdoor Theaters Dance halls Commercial recreation other than specifically permitted Commercial riding stables Commercial parks. camp grounds, trail rides, gun clubs and ranges. archery ranges. race tracks. com- mercial snowmobile courses Tavern as secondary use of prop.. erty Golf driving range and puttlnc courses Marinas BUSINESS DISTRICTS LB Limited Business Multiple dweUings with town- houses at an M-l density and others as an M-2 density Two family dwellings Clubs and lodges Molel NB Nel,hborhoud Buslness Service station after minimum 2000 sq. ft. of retail floor space is constructed Veterinary cUnic or pet hospital with no outside pens Outdoor display only during op- erating hours Be Shop pin, Center Service station after minimum 25,000 sq. ft. of retail floor space is constructed Veterinary clinic or pet hospital with no outside pens Page 10 ." '<1' , u v.l ~ ~ ~ o N ~ - ~ ..,. ",.-"- V> ~ "'" ~ M ~ N ~ - ~ o I I I I I I I I al o I I I I I I I I I I I I I~ r.: .; .; I I -- I I I ~ '" I I 8888 1t"l000 ",r-:r-:r-: * * * 88~~ ~-lt")\t') ~~oOoO --** ~I I ~ .; I I I - .; V> I I I N ~ 5 :l 8 8 <> O't:l .!:l toO ::c .8 ::l.5 = u 8' =-=- :l'~~ ~" ~Sl38!-o<: .r-) .,: ~ 8 ~ ~ >, .I. Go) a 0 .- =-= ~~ ,'; ~:;'a ~ ~ .- 0) '-'- ~ u. u. ~ ,< '1(e u. il il ~ -::>1f~ ~oo . Q . ._.5 \0 .....I ...... V)V) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 888 It"llt"llt"l -:'NM 888 It"l It"l In -:"r-iC'f'i' ~~~ t<i..;", 8 o ..0 888 000 ";",..0 888 qqq V> \0 r- . . . &&& It"l \0 r- . . , I I I I I I I I I ~ 'E ::l 8 11 '~j =>,8e <>u80 ,I';.~~ 8 as al ls <:11l.!.N I I I I I I I I I, I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I 00 8 I I 00 I I I g c.. I I I g c.. g$$g 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ . . . gggg _0\0\0\ ...on* * * g I I I c.. ~ I I I - g I I I c.. '" 0) toO 8 S ~] ~ -=- .i ~ oJ!~~!-o<: ~~ggaa ]g~~~~ lo\'8 8 8 ~ ~ o;:,~~g,og,o Ii: ~MVjtii I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 88~ In r- - 88~ It"lr-- 88~ In r- - 080 o It"l It"lr-_ S;;;8~ 1Or-- . . . 88~ r-oo- . . . I I I I I I ~ I I ~ ::l :e. 8 i raal 'E~ .. ::l 0 ra .:;: = >,8:a v(.)~-c s.!;i "" <: "'uO).c 8.E al \;l <~"':"ti1 ~ .0 ~N -.>(S;;; +l:lo ~I:>.o N 'N - ~8 +,>(0 ~l:lo N I:>.N -';8 + 1:>.0 0", . N.>(O N~N o r:>.~ :J: 0 N o ~ o ~ o ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 o N .; In .; N ~ o N ~ o N .; - <II V> 8 - e~\n . . '<t . . . . 00 -'<tlt"l : : ~ . . 000 M In '<t - 000 M~~ 000 r'f'l~oo::t 000 M~"I';t 000 f11~~ 01t"l0 f"1~""'" 01t"l0 f"')~"Ct 000 ('f')~oo::t 000 ~~M oo~ MM. -. 00lt"l f"1~M 000 ~~"Ct 000 C'I~v ''t:l a .~ ~ '" 8 ::l 8 o '2 In '13 >. =Ei o 8", V) cS 15.. il ~ toO 0) C C O;;i C o ",'_ It"l .... >. 0'2 l:!i:o o't:l ~ ~ ~ 2~ g~ ~ 1l't:l .l::"3 8: ::l 0 00 as ~ r-: o:;~O? It'') ..0..9 II") =.c 0 '" u ' .c ::l In '" '" .c o 11~ ;0 1n.!2",e >. CIl .s ~ S 1l Jgofi) "0 o t 5 c It"l 08 '" ~:a ~ ,.. ,.. GI Cl co D. o "'" .::- .~ .8 '2 ::l = 's = ';;:j E .9 ~ '" -s '" >'''' -a.:u 0'" oJ! ~'" e::-~ CD _~ r =.- '" 't:l GI 8.5 Cl g.:g ~ :. -::l . ~ 0""" '" ~ = o ",.9 ..",.. '2 5 ~ ::n:> v.l -0::::100" <>~~ = '" c bO '" o:l C u p:;':;: IS >..~ c 'o~'E! "3~o ;l: .!! S o =.~ = ~V, <: . . * * * * o M ~ o M o 0 In It"l N oV')V') 000 10 -NM C'f'l......~ It') - o It"l ~ o In 1:: 1:: l:!i: ~ ~ ~ ~'""' ,....'" 8 u '" u 8 ~ 8 .5 ~ II .~ ' ..-=-] ls~ls],"e ,....~B b8 =3 "'0'" o~ E8u '-' e e~ t:.O_ 00";3' V ~ v..w ::s '-" 2 ..-.. ~ ~ u.G~ ~ls~~~~~jE~~U~~ ~.ej ~.;bO~~~~~.~e~~~j - ~-~._-- ",,,,-'-'~,,, ~~; ~j~~ls;ls;g~1l~~'t:lQ -~a"585t~a~a..utfr~~t :::: U >. ~ "" 0 "" > ~ >. ~ i:''Eb"t:l > Cl .. >. ~ ~~~Ml~lSS~~3~$8-~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~::C~ .3u.<: '" .ee .3 ~ .:;: 5 "" 'ii.j ~ ~ 8 - 00 -'<tlt"l : : 'V * . i o o M ~ 00 -'<Tlt"l : : 'V . . o M o In - 00 -'<tv> : : en . . o M 8 - 00 -'<T1t"l ::r") * * o M o - o N - o M o - 00lt"l _MM o It"l - o M o - 001t"l MMM o It"l - o M o - 001t"l NMM o 00 ~ o - \0 00lt"l -MM 8 - o - It"l M 00lt"l -MM It"l \0 - It"l M o - 001n -It"lM 8 M o M o - 001t"l - In M .~ ..:. f. Compliance with Law. The' final plat sh.911 be pre-part'd in accordance with all applicable State laws. and Count V Of"dinanct'S. 11.02. Council Action. T~ Council shall act on the final pial wilhin60davs 0' Ihe datt' on which if was filed wilh tht' Clerk. The 'ina' plat shan nol be approved If if does. not conform to Ihe preliminary plat includino aU changes required bV the Council. or does no' meet Ihe engine-ering and des.ign slandards and specificalions of Ihe Community. 11.0J Recordin,. Following approval of Ihe fiMI plat bv Ihe Council. the Clerk shall promplly nollfy Ihe subdivider Of said approval and wilhin 30 days Ihereafter. the final pial shall be recorded with the Regisler of Deeds or Registrar of Tilln of Anoka County. The subdivider Shall forthwith furnish the Clerk with a tracing and 3 copies of Ihe flna' pial as recorded. showing evidence of Ihe recording on said copies. Failure of Ihe subdl.vider to comply with the requirl!'ment of recording shan be cause for rt'sclsston of .approval. 11.04 Required Flnil' Plat Dat.. It shall be . candillon 10 Ihe approval of .. final plat th.t the lollowing dala shall be shown on said plat or shall be lurnished Iherewlth: a. Municipal. lownship. county or section lines accurately lied 10 Ihe boundaries of Ihe subdivision by distancn and angles. b. Accurate angular and lineal dimensions 'or' all lines. anoles and cur va lures used to describe boundarin. streets, easemenls. areas. reserved lor public use. and other important fealures shall be shown. Complete curve data shall be shown. Including radii. ir'lternal angll!'S. points and curvatures. tangent bearings. and lengthS of all arcs. Dimensions of lot lines shall be s.hown in 'eet and hundredths of feel. No dino work shall be permitted in indicating dimension. c, Official monuments as designated and adOplf:d by 'he County Surveyor and approved bV the District Courl lor use as judicial monuments shaU be Sf:1 ., each corner or anole of the oulside boundary of the final pial. Location and ties of all monuments shall be shown. d. Pipl!'S or steel roos shall be placed al each corner 0' each lot and thl!' location thereot shall be shown. e. An identification system for an lols and blocks shall be shown. t. Streets Shalt be named and all names shall be shown. A sfquence of street naming shall be followed consislenl wilh the pattern that has been eslabliShed In the area. 9. In the event the final pial is" re.plal of an earlier subdivisicn. the original platting 01 Ihe subdivision s.hall be shown and Identified bv dolled lines. h. Judicial and county ditches shall be shown by dimensions and angles as determined 'rom counly records. I. Low land and waler areas shall be Indicated by an idenli,ication symbol. I. The maximum highwater level as. defined in the DePilrtment 0' Conurvation Regul.atlons .and Slalewide Slilnduds and Criteria for Management of Shoreland Areas of Minnesota. k, All ulilltv and drainage easements. and the dimensions Ihereof. shall be shown. I. The names and plaltino of adfoining subdivisions shall be shown and identified by dolled lines to " distancl!' of 100 leet Irom the bOund.ries of the subdivision under consideration. lot, block and str~1 arranc;Jements 01 such adjoining subdivisions shaft be shown. Where adjacent land Is unp;atted, it _ shall be so indicated. m. Before any residential plat may be approved and before any permit may be Issued for a residence Iherein. the subdivider shall first present competent proof Ihat thenalural ground waler level at an limes in said subdivision is nolll!'SS than 3 feel below the level of Ihe 10wI!'sl portion of the propos.ed struClure, or Ihal " satislaclorv system at ground Woller control will be comlructed as. an inl~gral pari 01 the proposed rnidentlal subdivi,ion. SECTION U. REGtSTE~ED LAND SURVEYS. The provisions 0' lhis ordinance shall apply to all r~islered land surveys within IheCommunitv. and the standards, rtoulalions and procedures hereo' shall govern the Subdivision of land bV registered land survey. BuildinO permi's shall be withheld on tracls which have been subdivided bV unapproved rC'Vlsterrd land surveys; and Ihe Community shall decline to accepl tr acts as slreels or road' or to Improve, repair or maintain such lracts within an unapproved regis.lered land survey. SECTION U. EASEMENTS. Prior '0 Ihe submission of a final plat, registered land surveyor land subdivision 10 the Council for approval. Ihe subdivider shall furnish Ihe Community with all easements 101' ulilllles.dralnage. street rights. Of.waV. surlace waler ponding, and such olher public' uses as shall be lound to be necessary. convenient or desirabte bV Ihe Community. Said easemenls shall be in proper form lor recording In the OfficI!' of the Register of Deeds or Regislrar of Titles. Duplicate cerlilicales of tille shall be made available for the liling 0' easements on regislered tand. No final plat shall be approved bV the Council unlil there has been 'ull compliance with Ihis section. SECTION 14. RESTRICTIONS ON FILING AND RECORDING CONVEYANCES. 14.0t Restricllons on Filing and Recording. In accordance with applicable Slale law, no COllvle')'ance of land 10 which the regulations are applicable shall be flied or recorded. II the land Is described in the conveyance by metes and bounds or bV reference to an unapproved regislered land survey made aller April 21. 1961 or 10 an unapproved plat made after such regulations become effective. The foregoing provision does nol apply to a conveyance If the land described: (11 was a separate parcel of record April ,. 194$ or the dall!' of adoption 01 subdivision regUlations under Laws 1945, Chapler 281. whichever is Ihe later. or 01 the Adoption 01 subdivision regulalions pursuant to a home rule charier, or (2) was the subJect 01 a wt'ltten agreement to convey enlered into prior 10 such lime, ~ (3) was a separate parcel of not less than two and l one.half acres in area and ISO feel In width on January 1. 19~6 or is a single parcel 01 land not less Ihan five acrnand having a widtholnolless than 300 'eet. In any CUI!' In which compliance with Ihe foregoing reslriclions will create an unnecessary hardShip and failure.ocomplydoes not inlerfere with Ihe purpose of Ihe subdivision regulations, the planing aulhorlty may waive such compliance by adoplion 01 a resolulion to that effecl and Ihe conveyance may Ihen be filed or record~d. Any ownrr or agent 01 Ihe owner of land who <onveys a lot or parcel in violation of Ihl!' provisions of Ihis SUbdivision shall lorleit ,nd pay 10 the municipalilya penallv of not less than noo.oo for each 101 or parcel so conveyed. A municipalltv may mioin such conveyance or may recover such penaltv bV a civil "lion in anv court 01 competent Jurisdiction. Seh /01< tl/rundnw..d:- B-5-l9<O 14.02 H~rdship. In any c,)Se in which compliance with he foregoing rntrlclions will create an unnecessary lards hip and lailure 10 comply does not inlerlere with Ihe purpose of Ihis ordinance, the Council may waivl!' such compliance bv adOPlion 0' a resolulion 10 thai effecl and the conveyance may then be filed or recorded. 14.01 Penalty. AnV owner or agenl of 'he owner of land who conveys a 101 or parcel 1n violation of the provision, 01 Ihis se<tion shall forfell and pay 10 the Communilva penaltv 01 nolless than SIOO'or uch lot or parcel so conveyed. Thl!' Communilv may enioln such conveyance or mav reCOVer such penalty by a civil action in any court 01 compel~nt Jurisdiction. SECTION .i. PLATS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. All preliminarv or linal plats. reoistered land surveys. or other subdivisions of land approved bv the Town Board bul not liIed with Ihe Regisler of Deeds under previOUS ordinances shall not be subjecl 10 requirements of this ordinance, provided said ()/:,j.~/o subdivision is Iiled within 6 monthS of the ellective dale 01 this ordinance. seCTION u. PERMITS 16.0t Improvements, AU electric and gas distribution lines or piping. roadways. walks and other similar Improve men Is shall be constructed only on a street, or other pUbliC way or easement which Is designated on an approved plat. or properly indicated on the official map of Ihe Community. or which has olherwise been approved bV the Council. }l 1&.01 Access. No permit for the erection of any building shall be 1ssued unless such building Is to be localed upon a parcel of land abottlng on . slreel or' highway whiCh has been deslgnaled on an approved plat. or on the official map 0' Ihe Community, or which has been olhl!'rwlse approved bV Ihe Council. This limitalion on issuing permits shall nol applv to planned unit developments approved bV Ihe Council pursuant 10 Ihe Zoning OrdlnenCI!. ~U.Ol Llmitallons. No building permit shall be Issued fortheereclionol anV building onany land conveyed In violation ollhe provisions of this ordinance. No permit shall be issued tor the erection ot anV building on any Iracl of land described by metes and boundS and consisting of less Ihan 5 acres and having a widlh ot Ius Ihan 330 leet. SECTION 11. VARIANCeS. .J. 17.01 Hardship. The Council may granl a variance - from the requirements of Ihls ordinance as to specific Iracls of land whlre It Is shown Ihal by reason 0' tOpQ9raphy of olher phVsic:al condlllons stricl compliance with these requirements could cause an exceptional and undue hardShip 10 the enjoyment of a substanllal properly right; provided, Ihat a variance may begrantedonly If Ihe variance does not adverselv affecl the adlacent property owners and ComprehenSive Plan or the spirit and Intent of this ordinance, 17.01 Procedure. 'Nrlnen application lor a variance Shall be tiled wllh Ihe Clerk, and shall state lully all facts relied upon bv the applicant. The application shall be supplemented wilh maps. plans or olher data which may aid In an analysis 01 the malter. The ipplicatlon shall be referred to the Planning Commission tor ils recommendalion and report to 'he Council. 11.03 Council Action. No variance shall be granled by Ihe Council unless It, shall have received the affirmative vote of a majority 0' the full Council. SECTION 11. VIOLATION AND PENALTY. Anv person, firm or corporation violallng any 01 the provisions of Ihls ordinance shall be ouilty of a misdemeanor. and upon conviction thereof shall be punished bv .. fine 01 not more than SJOO or by imprisonment not 10 exceed 90 days or both lor each ottense. The platting. replalting, SUbdividing or conveyance 0' land not In accordance with the requirements of Ihis ordinance mav be enforced by mandamus. InJunction. or any other appropriate remedy in any court 01 competent lurisdiction. SECTION 1'. REPEAL. All ordinances or porlions thereot in conflict with the provisions 0' Ihis ordinance are hereby repealed. SeCTION 20. EFFECTIVE DATE. Thisordinance shall take effecl and be in torce Irom and after lis passagl!' and publicalion. Passed bv the Council Ihis 15th day of February. "n. ' Lou Applebv CHAIRMAN ATTEST: Marv L. Wesl CLERK abcdelc;Jhi IklmnopqrstuvwxVz Published in Anoka Co. Union Feb. 25. 1972 .~..._.._-----_.._---_.,.._.~.....~,. 7:30 P.M. 7:30 P.M. ~, Q CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 19, 1988 1. Call to Order 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4. Discussion Items a. Bent Creek Estates Preliminary plat b. Coon Creek Regional ponding c. Mamlock Fencing/Drainage d. Approve Deeding East 33' to Property Owners NE of SW of Section 9 e. Assessment Policy Uplander street 88-14 f. Final Payment 87-6 Commercial Park g. Bond Sale h. Revision to Development Contract i. Request a Public Hearing on High Risk Sexual Conduct Ordinance j" purchase property in TIF District k. 5. Staff, Committee, Commission a. Approve Installing Handicapped signs b. Award Bid/Hawkridge park c. 6. Non-Discussion Items a. Old Colony Estates Final Plat b. Accept Easements 88-2 ward Lake Drive c. Award Bid 88-1 Crosstown Boulevard d. Approve Plans and Specs, Order Ad for Bid 88-13 Creekhaven; 88-17 Red Oaks Manor 5th; 88-21 Northwoods Tennis court; 88-8 Old Colony Estates e. 7. Approval of Minutes 8. Approval of Claims 9. Adjournment o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE Julv 19. 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion I m Engineering <1~ ITEM NO. Bent Creek Estates Preliminary Plat 4a. BV:Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to review and approve the preliminary plat, grading, drainage, and erosion control plan per Ordinances 8 and 10. The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the preliminary plat and their comments are as follows: General Comments: * The preliminary plat consists of 11 residential lots which are currently zoned R-4. * The proposed plat is within the Metropolitan urban Service Area (MUSA) . * Total acreage of the plat is 12.0. OTHER COMMENTS: * THOMAS Me CABE IS FEE OWNER OF PROPOSED LOTS 9, 10, 11 OF BLOCK 1. WRITTEN CONSENT BAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED FROM MR. MC CABE. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO RECEIVE WRITTEN CONSENT FROM MR. MC CABE OR REDRAW THE PRELIMINARY PLAT EXCLUDING MR. MC CABE'S PROPERTY. * The following comments are per the preliminary plat checklist (Ordinance 10): 8.01 IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION a. proposed name is Bent creek Estates. d. Scale is 1" = 50'. c. The subdivider is Campbell Real Estate. g. Surveyor is Lot Surveys Company, Inc. Engineer is Progressive Consulting Engineers, Inc. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY 8.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS o f. The existing street Right-of-way for Bunker Lake Boulevard is shown. j. A soil report has been received. Lowest floor elevations have been adjusted 3 feet above the natural ground water level at all times and above the 100 year flood elevation. 8.03 DESIGN FEATURES d. The Building Department has reviewed the overall grading plan and it appears to be adequate. Lot 5, the developer has proposed to use retaining walls. 9.02 STREET PLAN c. Lot 11 of Block 1 will need a variance. This section of the Ordinance does not allow lots to front on arterial streets. Bunker Lake Boulevard is considered an arterial street. 9.03 STREETS a. The typical street section does conform to City standards for an urban area. m. All dri~eway access from individual lots shall be located 60 feet or more from any intersection. 9.06 LOTS e. Floodplain management is Coon Creek. The developer is proposing to fill in the ,flood fringe of the floodplain. All other permits from other agencie~ may be required and would be the developer's responsibilities. 9.07 PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, OPEN SPACE Park dedication as required. o o Q CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BENT CREEK ESTATES AS BEING DEVELOP!D BY CAMPBELL REAL ESTATE IN SECTION 33-32-24. WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and reviewed the preliminary plat of Bent Creek Estates; and WHEREAS, the plat has been reviewed by the Andover Review Committee; and WHEREAS, there was no large amount of negative comments; and WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing and review, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the plat citing the following: 1) A variance from Ordinance 8, Section 4.23, Subsection (a) as the existing structure of Lot 11, Block 1 encroaches within the 75 foot setback line which is measured from the ordinary high water mark. 2) A variance for Lot 11, Block 1 from Ordinance 10, Section 9.02, Subsection (c) as it pertains to the lot fronting on a county road (Bunker Lake Boulevard). 3} Park dedication as determined by the Park Commission. WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the preliminary plat of Bent Creek Estate. Adopted by the City council of the City of Andover this , 19 day of CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Volk - City Clerk o o J Planning and Zoning Commission June 28, 1988 Meeting Minutes Page Three Mr. Jacobson was concerned about the siltation fence as proposed on the fill grading plan and asked if the developer felt erosion would be a problem. The developer agreed he was concerned about the erosion. Motion was made by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by Commissioner Vistad that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat of Bent Creek Estates on the property described as Lot 1 of Auditor's sub. No. 137 of the south half of Section 33, Township 32, Range 24 for the following reasons: The preliminary plat has been reviewed by the Planning Commission, the Engineering Department and the Andover Review Committee for the City' of Andover and though concerns have been expressed in regard to particular issues. Those issues, by in large, have been resolved. The Planning Commission has raised concern as it relates to Lot 11 of Block I with the 60 foot right of way for Bunker Lake Boulevard but notes that is an existing structure and further Lot 11 of Block 1 will require a variance J from Ordinance 8 as it pertains to plats fronting on county roads (Section 9.02}j however, there is no other way to service this piece of property as the requirement of a 40-foot service road would render this parcel unusable. It should be noted that Lot 10 of Block 1 and Lot 1 of Block 1 shall front on the interior street of Bittersweet only. The developer is required to change the right-of-way dimension of Bunker Lake Boulevard from 50 feet to 60 feet as set out in the letter from Anoka County dated Dec. 16, 1981 and reaffirmed with other plats that have been reviewed by the County as it pertains to right-of-way. , The approval of the plat is contingent upon the developer identifying the 75-foot setback line from the ordinary high water mark of Coon Creek as set out in Section 4.23, subsection la) as it pertains to shoreline lots. A public hearing was held and there was input from area residents; however, that input had more to do with the fact that they were told this property would not be developed as opposed to strict opposition to the development of this property as residential building sites. This preliminary plat would also be contingent upon the developer obtaining from the City of Andover a conditional use permit as it pertains to filling in the general floodplain as set out in Ordinance 50 and further that any permits that are required from the either the Coon Creek Watershed and/or the Corps of Engineers be received and favorable approval by those governmental units be granted. 1,:";'''':'.l-''.;~-..~~a~~.:i,~,~,,,~,:'\5,,"-Bi".r,~....~'i.j,~fiplci.i-"J ~:,;;~,..:,,~;i'~'..s.'.i';'" '''-.' :. ~ _" ___. .._._ _ _ ___ ____ . _ _ _ _ ._ ~ . '" .~".~::...t.~-:......';...J.l:"!:I-....f;'~t~......~.. ..... -':,"",--,~~.;;;...",.."~~.,, . . II' _.__._ o CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The city of Andover Planning and zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 7:30 ~.M, or as soon thereafter as can be heard, Tuesday, June 28, 1988 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover MN to consider the preliminary plat of Bent Creek Estates consisting of 10 single family residential lots being developed by Campbell Real Estate on the property described as Lot 1 of Auditor's sub. No. 137 of the South half of Section 33, Township 32, Range 24. All opponents and proponents of said proposed preliminary plat will be heard at the above time and location. o '. .- CITY of ANDOVER '. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Street Location of Property: cl r-"!O i ~vvk lJ< ~ d . Legal Description of Property: s~? ~~?f5 tlt.>./U) '6 . 'TY1. \'3".1'+1 ~ Y2.~ow~ M. t~-l."- J Property Owner: 'S.n.lJ~j J r~-~r6?':/, Address: IS 2.0 ~f1/1 irlJ7.,(+.. J!!. 13 ''vi 0 Applicant: r~-t~1 ~f(L{4.~f-. -rUIC Address: IS ~g rnll1.'IIJ~~" lit! ~ R LlJ ~: Description of Request: IC left ~JIl)J:::.iry{ / .... Phone: '13~ - %'0 /) 1, - Phone: q=>, c,- ~oo1 Rezoning Request Required: yes____ ~ Explain Fee: Date Paid: 6-1~- 8' 15 Receipt No: :J.7tOG o .. ro-/~-tg (Date) , . .-, ,^-,,,,_,,~,,,,,,~,;,"'_._ "h. applicant one week prior to the hearing. preliminary plat is placed on city Council agenda. Inform applicant of the City Council action. If request is granted, provide applicant with a copy of the resolution stating the conditions upon which approval is granted. If denied, provide applicant an explanation of the basis of denial. I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and material submitted with this application is complete and accurate per City ordinance and policy requirements. I understand that only complete applications will be scheduled for an appropriate Planning Commission meeting. I understand that the application will be processed in sequence with respect to other submittals. ~~~ .~/.. A pant's)ti-9nature o ,..,~..~ Date Application Approved By Date '. COUNTY OF ANOKA Department of Highways Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520 March 18, 1988 Progressive consulting Engineers, Inc. 6040 Earl Brown Drive suite 140 Minneapolis, MN. 55430 Attention: Dan Allmaras Regarding: proposed Cul de Sac off CR 18 Dear Mr. Allmaras: We have reviewed the sketch you provided for a proposed Cul de Sac extending south from CR l8/Bunker Lake Boulevard between Crooked Lake Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevard. The proposal, at best, is poor from a transportation standpoint. Bunker Lake Boulevard at this point already carries in excess of 10,000 cars per day and we expect volumes to continue increasing. A cul-de-sac with access only to a major roadway will always be a problem for residents who have to get in and out of the street on a daily basis and generally speaking at the peak hour times. As such, we cannot recommend a cul-de-sac at this location. We withhold any further comments, concurrence, approval or recommendations until such time as the City of Andover, the Coon Creek Watershed and the Army Corps of Engineers have stated that a proposal of these lots within the floodway and flood plain are acceptable to all agencies involved. At such time as these agencies have concurred that this is in fact a viable plan, we would be happy to comment further on access. If you should have any questions, please,feel free to contact me. Si~e~elY, ~ /0~a:;;;y/~ o William A. Sironen, PE Assisttnt County Engineer - Administration xc: .J:.i ty of Andover Coon Creek Watershed-. Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer o ~~te ".. :-':;':" ..:'.:~~~.;1'i:. .~."".:.; Sc~1 e.. -. o .~!o \f"C;'t-I)" / ~'\) -- I"::O/{)()D A- ~ z "'\ ~ r '" < ~ m RM1"O\ c3~ 0 134TH x~ a ",~\(r , ~...:; , ~/~ I "" ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS REFERENCE MARK RM1 ELEVATION (FT. NGVD) B68.2 UII wl,..1 ...iu\.: .,1 Lluol..cd. L:"-I.: BtIUlt:V.lld .11 13"lil ~\V' .\\'''....1. .ill I,;.I~{ Id\.O: 01 lHIW....' POll'; ill',ll.l 01 !.l~ :o.l.rc\\. 1)\ U.S. (~nllu~il.ll ':)UI\''''\. A: \H':-'\ ..iJc 01 ClUol..l:d L.ll..l' H\luh:\'.lIo. 4t1"1 pu;..tl'! 01 BUlIh.l'l lo,""' BOUIC\'.Lld NUllhwc~t. (nL'JI tlOUSC I: hL',ld 1)1 I.IJ.!, :-,;.It"\\'. l::~l,lhli..lll...d tW U.S. (;colo~i1.:.t1 5Ulh'\ DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION RM2 B79.6 RM3 r4.6 /\IOIl\{ Bun!.."" t .Ill' Boule., ,1...1 NOIlh\Vc~1 ...1 hrid1-!c Ca'L'''. .Ll jlllH..tio!l oj Up...lIl.:.1111 Wlllgw<.l11 .mtl wl":d .Ii: plllnl.!,; top 01 thlC.llb 01 bc)1t p.liU1Cd Il'U. ~:tl.lbli::.11 (~l.tlloJ.th. ,II SLII vcy. RM4 B64,B AlollJ.:, cd')l b.lOk 01 Coon (lcd.., I,UOO Iccl up:,lfC.Il'll II I..II..l' Boull'vell d NOllhwl'\I. In 2-1001 di.lIllctcI 4.01 ton 1H.'eld ollel~ ~4.ICW. t="l.lbli~hl.:d hy U,S, Gi..'olo~il,1I SUI'iC\ ,\pPIU,,<ilH.1IClv 90 tcel nl'lll1\\'l'~t 01 inlel~Cl..lioll 01 I.: NOIlhw(,:~l .tlll! CIIl\.U~ SUl'l'! NUllhwc\t, in ~oulh IclL.l di,lInctcl L.ullol1wt!ul! Ill'I:; IW.ld 01 0.375-inl.h I<l~ ~..l !i,:>llCd hv U.S, (.e(llu~iL..1l ~lll\'e\, RM5 B69.1 RM6 B72.4 At \mull CI1<.I vi (Ulllll'li: L.UIVl'll undcl 142nd LillI.' \\ont' 01 1\'\ wuod :'11'1..'1 NOlthwl.')t: ..Ilisch:d \qu,IlI:. hv U.S. ('l'oloc,il.,tl SlIIVC\', AI hlidy-c U\'CI CllOri CICl.'k UIl 'StlUltl CtH)ll e'Cl't.. IJli lion ul WI..'\I UOWI1)IIC"111 .lhutnll"l1l' witll will1-lW.III; L.lli" l)I,lhli...hl'd h~' U.S. (jcolo~il.:,a1 SUI \C\'.. RM7 B68.0 '. Allln~ SoulhCuon CICCt.. Ori\<c, 10 leet nOlll1 o! ~i..'nH:: lk~ll.'l'~ Ill'ud ill Ill,ILI, in )Uuttl 1,1..1.' ul Iwin.l1un1..t:d I lot'l ,dlOh' ~ItHlOd; I1l',ld 01 O,37".illdl I,l~ ')Ul'W. ~-') L!.~. ('l'ol(}~i;,,11 SllJ\'C\', RM8 B79,1 RM9 679.0 Altltl\.~ ~otllh Coon CICCt.. Dlivc, ~:' kel ",oull1 01 '.I~l1ll" 1'.1...101 d:l\l'W.I\' 10 hOU"I' IlU, .!6,ll{, III IS.Ull.h di.lnll' IW,!d III hl'l11 ().3i'i-indl1,1~ "~Il'\\. l-.~I.lhli~lH'd by L!.:-- ....."..'..\' o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE July 19, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discus,sion Items Engineering 1"S~ ITEM NO. Coon Creek Regional ponding 4b. BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council i,s requested to approve the proposed areas for regional ponding within the City of Andover limits. The City has already been working with the Coon Creek Watershed Board for regional ponds. Ar~as would include Winslow Hills, Old Colony Estates and Oak Bluff 2nd Addition. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY , \ , '" . )N NC~1T1-{ERN n~ I , '" I " I I , : r. '..:: .--: ~'t -- i ' I "'=------v- I :,( I I I , 0,=1 I .~ '~-.. , . I , .'/. '-".:'-' ~; :~~ - " I" o , I ~!~, . 'd J.> Z o 10 .< m ;J;/'", ' ". ' t. l~( ! [D ~:.a~' , i,l~:'~ I :m!l(lm Sb~. ;.,., . (IIl,,~ . UI:-t.... , ~. b~ ".., ...~ ,. j( ?: , '"' ,~.,~ . " OJ ~ I' , .. " ~~ ;; , HAlf~H: nOA6 ~ 4tt ~ "'VI '" rJ) ~ ~ I\J (f' - ""OJ -c Zt '^l 'm .:0 r' )> .^ m 'OJ r <, kJO ~~y !. .~m.llllli1l II,. . ~~r.' T ~-~ . . ." , ~ ; ;;,-<.} 1".........."'''"Il..~. '''l ::i n~ I......'..... I It; ROUND V ,'t ~ , .r,"' '" .I J 1. r- ',I t: 0; I l_.... " . '. . 1. ,: -v ,,~ .~ t..-') , : h. " '., i I<J .' . -. -). C/, ....!.- ~IQ ~'""~ m :t~.... m :< ~!,'::<,,: J;i a, : .,.~.. :<'.0 ...... .,. ...li" '('I m 0.. . 0 (,;!!-J,.t~\~,~:,,~ : -.:4 \0-4> -< . ~, . m!"R o. . In ~l /_ :< liO N ::~, :~~N~ \~, .~ <" m~~ "':z: ': 0 . om < 0 )>om . . . 00 .:.~~ I Q. .".., it :1 .. '" --l ::E ..'~", ~"""''''''''''''''''.'''''''''''"''J ""J"~~;: 1 '1" .. i ~ ~ ""'~< j\"".. ~i!.j' ,,;:,. , rf,' d. c,;j; I\.; " I . '. . ';~), ~ ; ~. "...~~ -, -~ ~~. -.. ">Ill.. -," -- , " '.' . }l' . '--'~~"".... ..... . .\\ ',' '. r J 'C~NTRl\d;A VE. N~_...: . I It ,?~. .' o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE July 19, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discu Engineering .()~ BY:Todd J. Haas ITEM NO. Mamlock Fencing/ Drainage 4c. The City Council is requested to discuss the Mamlock property in regards to fencing, drainage and/or landscaping. See attached map for location. The lot is located across from the Andover Commercial park. Some options are available. They would include: 1. The property owner fepce the parameter of the rear yard. A. Maximum height of fencing on the property line is 6 ft. B. Maximum height of fence 10 ft. off the property line is 8 ft. This may not solve the problem for the residents because the fence in either case will not obstruct the view of the Commercial Park from the 2nd floor. Structure is a split-entry walkway. 2. Berming along Verdin Street is a possibility with some landscaping (pines, shrubs, etc.). This also will not obstruct the view of the Commercial Park until the trees mature. 3. Do nothing. The property owner will be present at the meeting to answer any questions the City Council may have. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY \ \ I . . (I . r-I \ I ! \ I~~ \ I I / .- -- _ 880 . - - - - -, \ I '0 <.'':-'\J .~ ~ . . L.' . ~"J " -, '.. L.' " " -:. _\ '~\i ,- ",' ~ ""' , \ "- .... ~ ~ \\ ~ ." ,. I ,~._. - ,- ~O ~ ~ ~ CJ B~2. ~ 0 '-.:.\ .do - ~/ . // ~' -Y-9IN -9Gc(3 f o !!! <; -9 s~ J! ~ ~ ~ ~ i I \1 ... s .. .. .. 11 <. r , , ~ t ( $ t t <.A! ~. .b; '~ (ii. ..... ..... I\) ". ..... ~: : I ::l.il /36TH it I ~ .' ~ ' ~ , ' '. " ..... o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE Julv 19 , ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Engineering ~1~ BY:Todd J. Haas ITEM NO. Approve Deeding to Property Owners 4d. The City Council is requested to approve deeding of the east 33 feet to property owners in the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 9. See ?ttached map for location of easement. The 33 feet is located adjacent to Lund's Evergreen Estates 3rd, 4th and 5th Additions. A road pattern for the two areas have been established, therefore, the 33 feet is not needed although a 10 foot drainage and utility easement is recommended along the entire stretch of the properties. ' Judy Snyder from 2820 167th Lane NW will be here to discuss this item with the City Council. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY ~ o I " ~ t, "t,' ~ 1'1'1 ._~p:7 (i9) (:n-z,y ",.;'.:l.rc~_. l~ ~ CENTER SEC. 9 "" ~i (;J) ( ~.9.7</ _;~.7 lID e~!"l:"WJ --- .fhe:.7 " '''~ f.!1f\ "1'1 I J (/7J*' \ Co, ..." ",I .,7 /,J'.!1'j.f-=- .... I' I I I: I: I~ I ! - . ~--- ~'".;~<::;,,::' ....;~d.7 (14) (-;.~~~) L""Vf J~"'.,7 . ~S.5~ ", "'II '1,\ (;17) f~::;1dc") : ~ .t ft) .., ~ ~ .~ 1,. '~ ,,\, ~" "i~ (9)\ (%'..!'~/'" ..r. .7 ~ 'i Ii .. ,.., .'~ I .; ~, ,'! ':.. I {I~(j"l , ~1. 1 ,..,-.~- "'-, (4) * (I) ~~ ~ ~ .'} ~ ",.. M (?-$.z"'!.... SN'tO'R.. ..76...,7 -2.;1..~-~--;'~ .. ..%.:fJ.,~, M (1M!) #dt:lA'r /1:..( ..7Z-u;/ s-.Y,PE~ ,!~... A'r. ~ --~ ~ ;j: _ ___ /,,5'~ '..(i!.:...~ 1<f'1 " fi: 1; '0:0 ,~ S ~ ...,." j.,. A.I.r /,$ ~., r \ ~~ ~~ " ' ~ '<f\ ~ ~ ~ -.... "". .." r~ ", "'" ' "....:J./1'lfl'j $A >If/J.~{, J!".!7Jf'H ..9:1# "'';.'. " ,'J J:~?'Jf.l~ ,2 jU:'f fso.e',$"/y' o'S \..u~ / (It) , \ . '/'1..,"" hi'f"l'I'f~E. ~ ~€.€. ~G ~ -.J €. 2 (It.' V, I .lJI,?>' .1"~' /1.5-1'- ~ 0 ~~ oJ" :S " ~ ~ 'U ..... \, ~ ~ , " I ~ 'Ii " ~ " '" ~; ,\" tf.,~ ~" ~ en \ en~ ~; '-"" ~, o .: ~ 5 '<' ::>. @ to ""f~I'<N s<t: .-.. " ' 'J ... J/5.~, ..5"R".!'~',-'.3E' 2 ~ ~k LUNl +..,.......", !i i,~ ,.1-~ ;:'/'('1'(' ~..~~~ .JJ..} "! / EVERGJ .IU" .f.11....5./~/f ~ ~ ,;'4)/ S ~i€. €.si ./,,~.. ,,,.,~ ::f~..~ r Ii 00. ~ 2,;:5.' 2 .. :':-~ '<\:-, .: - .~'. ,f .'i~ ~~ ,,,;.,: l o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE July 19, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT FOR Discussion Items Engineering ITEM NO. Assessment Policy Uplander St./88-14 4e BY:James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to establish an assessment policy for 88-14 Uplander Street South. We are confident the plat was approved with certain lots labled unbuildable per Planning and zoning minutes and also a map in the file. If the vacant lots are assessed the lots end up tax forfeit like Cedar Crest vacant lots did. I am going to try to talk to Chapmans, the owners of the vacant/unbuildable lots. See May 17th, June 7th & July 5th agenda. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE Julv 19. 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ITEM NO. Final Payment 87-6 Commercial Park 4f. BY:James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting the work and authorizing final payment for Project 87-6 Commercial Park Phase I and Verdin Street grading. The Council approved the final payment on July 5th but the amount has been disputed (see John Rodeberg's letter). We were going to try to correct this at the Work Session on 7/12/88 but didn't. The proposal now is to pay the final not a partial and final. John's letter explains the disputed numbers. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY '. 1'KDA T.oL TZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.1893 612/292.4400 FAX 612/292,0083 July 12, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Andover, Minnesota Re: Commercial Park Phase I and Verdin St. Grading ProJ ect 87-6 Andover, Minnesota Commission No. 8840 Dear Mayor and Council: At the last regular Council meeting a final payment for the above referenced project was approved. The contractor, Gammon Brothers, disputes quantities related to extra work created by delays and inaccuracies In the soils report. The contractor was required to mobll ize two additional times to complete the surcharge placement, and was also required to remove 11,000 additional cubic yards of muck excavation, over what was noted on the pi ans. This has created an overrun on the contract amounts for common excavation, muck excavation, and aggregate backfll I material. Mike Gammon, President of Gammon Brothers, has requested payment for one additional mobilization at the bid price of $6,215.00 for extra mobilizations. We will submit a revised final payment for the regular Council meeting on July 19,1988. In the meantime, we recommend paying the undisputed amount ($31,351.99) that was previously approved. A revised payment form Is attached to this letter. Since the contract requires payment within 25 days of the end of the pay period, whIch Is June 20th, we are obligated to pay Gammon Brothers for the undisputed amount of the contract before the next meeting. J JPR:adh Enclosure o o Com. No 8840 Cert. No. 3R* St. Paul, Minn., July 12 I~ Owner To City of Andover, Minnesota This Certifies that Gammon Brothers , Contr~ctor For Commercial Park Phase I and Verdin St. Grading (87-6) Thirty-one Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-one and Is entitled to 99/100 Dollars--------------------------------- ($ 31,351. 99 ~ ) being 3rd estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated Sept. 22 I 88 9- Received payment in full of above certificate. TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED ENGINEERS AND ARCHt ECTS CONTRACTOR I9- CONTRACT PAYMENTS CREDITS PLUS EXTRAS Contract price plus extras 144,261 16 All previous payments 145,5();; 46 - All previous credits - Extra No. Change Order No. 1 - 17,272 66 " " - " " - - .. " - ~ " " - - Credit No. " .. .. .. - - .. " - AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE 31,351 99 - - Totals 126,988 50 176,914 45 - - Credit Balance There will remain unpaid on contract after payment or this - - Certificate (49,925 95) - - 126,988 50 126,988 50 RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT o o TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Engineers-Architects-Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS Estimate No. ~ Period Ending July 12. 19~ Page Commercial Park Phase I and Project Verdin Street Grading. Project 87-6 Location Andover, Minnesota Contractor Gammon Brothers 1 of 1 Comm. No. 8840 Original Contract Amount $ 144.216.16 Total Contract Work Completed $ 176.914.45 Total Ap proved Cr ed Its $ Total Approved Extra Work Completed $ Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed $ Total Amount Earned This Estimate $ 176.914.45 Less Approved Credits $- LessJ- % Rata I ned $ 0.00 Less Previous Payments $ 145.562.46 Total Deductions $ 145.562.46 Amount Due This Estimate $ 31.351.99 o Engineer Date Contractor Date 7-12-88 0 .Elll.M8ILl::ill...2E * ANDOVER COMIvERCI AL PARK PHASE I AND V ERD IN SlREET GRAD I NG ffiOJECT 87-6 ANDOVER, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 8840 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE I TEM NO. DESrn I PT ION QUANT ITY UNIT PR ICE: AM)U NT 1 tIOB IL IZATION 1.0 LS 6215.00 6,215.00 2 CLEM ING 7.5 AC 1020.00 7,650.00 3 GRUBB ING 7.5 AC 642.60 4,819.50 4 COMf.ON EXCAVATION 47540.0 CY 1.20 57,048.00 5 MJCK EXCAVATION 29200.0 CY 1.50 43,800.00 6 SALV N3E TOPSO IL (STOCKP ILE 6000.0 CY 0.10 600.00 7 TOPSOIL BORROr\' (LV) 0.0 CY 0.10 0.00 8 15" RCP PIPE SEWER 0.0 LF 24.50 0.00 9 48" RC PIPE SEWER, Q III 0.0 LF 77.00 0.00 10 1 5" RC PIPE AffiON S W/TG 0.0 EA 350.00 0.00 11 48" RC PIPE AffiONS W/TG 0.0 EA 1095.00 0.00 12 60" D I A CB W/ SHORT mNE 0.0 EA 1450.00 0.00 13 CATCH BAS IN DES IGN C OR G 0.0 EA 950.00 0.00 14 RANDOM R I ffiAP, Q III 0.0 CY 35.00 0.00 15 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE IV 0.0 SY 4.80 0.00 16 S IL T FENCE:, PREASSEM3LED 6028.0 LF 1.65 9,946.20 17 ROADSIDE SEEDING 16.7 AC 250.00 4,175.00 18 SEED MIXTURE NO.5 835.0 LB 3.41 2,847.35 19 MJLai MATERIAL TYPE 1 34.0 TN 136.50 4,641 .00 20 COMM FERTlL IZER 10-10-10 4.2 TN 330.75 1,389.15 21 SOD 0.0 SY 1.68 0.00 22 EXXON GTF 300 GEOTEX FABR 6575.0 SY 1.25 8 ,21 8 .7 5 ALT AGGREGATE BACKFILL MAll 11362.0 CY 2.25 25,564.50 ------------ ------------ 176,914.45 o o AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ITEM NO. Bond Sale 4g. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Julv 19, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: James E. Schrantz ~ The city Council has scheduled a $500,000 bond sale for MSA street construction for 7:30 P.M. to be opened and read a the meeting. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION July 19, 1988 DATE Discussion Items Engineering AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Revision to Developmen Contract 4h. BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the review of the development contracts to include an insurance provision. Bill Hawkins will discuss. Enclosure - Copy of Development Contract insurance page COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o .. .I. -.I. -- --... ..------.- 10. INSURANCE. Developer shall take out and maintain until six (6) months after the City has accepted the private improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal property, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of his subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no/lOO ($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than Two Hundred Thousand and no/lOO ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of One Million and no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The Ci ty shall be named as an addi tional insured on the pOlicy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the Ci ty must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any dis- claimer for failure to give the required notice. o , o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NQ Discussion Items DATE July 19, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT FOR ITEM Request Public Hearing NQ on High Risk Sexual Conduct Ordinance 4.i. BY: Oar 1 D. More Planning The City Council is requested to discuss requesting the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on adoption of a High Risk Sexual Conduct Ordinance similar to the one adopted by the City of Minneapolis (see attached). The Planning Commission has discussed this matter on numerous occasions and has decided not to consider adoption of this ordinance at this time for the following reasons: 1. There currently exists a lack of concrete evidence that high risk sexual conduct is taking place at Vapors, the City's only establishment that currently would fall under the provisions of this ordinance. 2. It was felt that it would be prudent and wise to await the outcome of the current litigation against the Minneapolis ordinance and a similar ordinance adopted by Marion County, Indiana (on which the Minneapolis ordinance is patterned). This sentiment was affirmed by City Attorney Hawkins as well. The Planning Commission is recommending an amendment to Ordinance 8, the Zoning Ordinance, which would excluded adult movie theatres, bookstores, cabarets, massage parlors and saunas from all districts in the city. This Ordinance 8 amendment will come before the City Council on August 2, 1988. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY .',. " o o df-z. I . J. (!. /1 (.1.F ! t.:. r 2/t 7;//e /~ Amending Section 219 of the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances relating to contagious diseases ARTICLE V. High Risk Sexual Conduct That Section 219 of the above entitled ordinance be amended to read as follows: 5219.500 FINDINGS. It is hereby found that there are within the City of Minneapolis commercial premises, buildings and structures, or parts thereof, which, by reason of the design and use of such premises, buildings or structures are conducive to the spread of communicable disease of danger to persons frequenting such premises, buildings and structures, and to the public health, safety and welfare of the community. The health, safety and welfare of all persons in the City of Minneapolis must be protected through the application and enforcement of standards regulating such premises, buildings and structures, in order to eliminate the possibility of the spread of, or infection by, contagious disease. The sexually transmittable disease of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, currently found to be irreversible and uniformly fatal, is found to be of particular danger to persons in this community. The incidence of this disease is found to occur in discernible population groups. The' .' o o risk factors for obtaining or spreading the disease are associated with high-risk sexual conduct. The commercial premises, buildings and structures where persons are placed at risk of infection from this disease or other communicable diseases facilitated by their design or use for high-risk sexual conduct are in need of regulation, and of establishment of minimal standards for the prevention of the spread of this disease and other communicable diseases for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare of the community. ~2l9.5l0 DEFINITIONS. (1) The term "high risk sexual conduct" means: (a) fellatio1 (b) anal intercourse1 (c) vaginal intercourse with persons who engage in sexual acts in exchange for money. (2) The term "hazardous site" means any commercial premises building or structure, or any part thereof, which is a site of high risk sexual conduct. (3) The phrase "booths, stalls, or partitioned portions of a room or individual rooms" means: (a) enclosures specifically offered to persons for a fee or as an incident to performing high risk sexual conduct1 or (b) enclosures which are part 'of a business operated on the premises which offers movies or other entertainment to be viewed within the enclosure, including enclosures wherein movies or other entertainment is dispensed for a fee. The" phrase "booths, stalls, or partitioned portions of a room or individual rooms" does not mean enclosures which .' o are private offices used by the owners, managers, or persons employed on the premises for attending to the tasks of their employment, and which are not held out to the public or members of the establishment for hire or for a fee or for the purpose of viewing movies or other entertainment for a fee, and are not open to any persons other than employees. (4) The phrase "doors, curtains or portal partitions" means full, complete, nontransparent closure devices through which one cannot see or view activity taking place within the enclosure. (5) The phrase "open to an adjacent public room so that the area inside is visible to persons in the adjacent public room" means either the absence of. any "door, curtain or portal partition" or a door or other device which is made of clear, transparent material such as glass, p1exig1ass or other similar material meeting building code and safety standards, which permits the activity inside the enclosure to be viewed or seen by persons outside the enclosure. (6) The words "Commissioner of Health" mean the City of Minneapolis Commissioner of Health. S2l9.520 BUILDING STANDARDS. (1) No commercial building, structure, premises or part thereof, or facilities therein, shall be so constructed, used, designed or operated for the purpose of engaging in, or o permitting persons to engage in, sexual activities which include high-risk sexual conduct. (2) No person shall own, operate, manage, rent, lease, or exercise control of any commercial building, structure, premises, or portion or part thereof, which contains: o o .' (a) Partitions between subdivisions of a room, portion or part of a building, structure or premises having an aperture which is designed or constructed to facilitate sexual activity between persons on either side of the partition. (b) Booths, stalls, or partitioned portions of a room, or, individual rooms, used for the viewing of motion pictures or other forms of entertainment, having doors, curtains or portal partitions, unless such booths, stalls, partitioned portions of a room, or individual rooms so used shall have at least one side open to an adjacent public room so that the area inside is visible to persons in the adjacent public room. Such areas shall be lighted in a manner that the persons in the areas used for viewing motion pictures or other forms of entertainment are visible from the adjacent public rooms, but such lighting shall not be of such intensity as to prevent the viewing of the motion pictures or other offered entertainment. (3)The standards as set forth in this section shall not apply to buildings, structures and premises which are lawfully operating as hotels, motels, apartment complexes, condominiums or rooming houses. S2l9.530 POWERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH. (1) In exercising powers conferred by this or any other section of thiS Code relating to communicable diseases, the Board of Health and the Commissioner of Health shall be guided by the most recent instructions, opinions and guidelines of the Center for Disease Control of the united States Department of Health and Human Services which relate to the spread of o o " infectious diseases. Any regulations which are adopted by the Board of Health which relate to controlling the spread of infectious diseases shall also apply in exercising the powers authorized by this code. (2) In order to ascertain the source of infection and reduce its spread, the Commissioner of Health, and persons under the Commissioner's direction and control, shall have full power and author i ty to inspect or cause to be inspected, and to issue orders regarding any commercial building, structure or premises, or any part thereof, which may be a site of high risk sexual conduct. If the Commissioner of Health determines that a hazardous site exists, the Commissioner of Health shall declare it to be a public health hazard and public health nuisance and shall then: (I) Notify the management, owner or tenant of the premises that the Commissioner has reasonable belief that the premises, building or structure is a hazardous site. (2) Issue warnings to the management, owner or tenant of the premises stating the reasons for the Commissioner's belief that the premises, building, or structure is a hazardous site. (3) Once issued, the Commissioner, proceed as follows: such notice and warnings have been or the commissioner's appointee shall (a) After the management, owner or tenant of the premises has been notified in writing as to the basis of the Commissioner's determination, the management, owner or tenant .' o o , . shall have ten (10) days to request a hearing before the Commissioner or the commissioner's appointee for a determination as to the existence of such hazardous site. If the management, owner or tenant of the premises does not request a hearing within ten (10) days of the notice, the Commissioner shall then cause' the premises to be posted with a warning advising the public that the premises have been declared a hazardous site. The Commissioner of Health shall cause orders to be issued to the management, owner or tenant of the premises constituting the hazardous site to take corrective measures to prevent. high risk sexual conduct from taking place within the premises. (b) If the management, owner or tenant of the premises requests a hearing, the hearing shall be held before the Commissioner or the commissioner's appointee at a date not more than thirty (30) days after demand for a hearing. After considering all evidence, the Commissioner or the Commissioner's appointee shall make a determination as to whether the premises constitute a hazardous site. The Commissioner shall then issue a decision based upon all evidence presented. If the Commissioner or the Commissioner's appointee makes a determination that the premises constitute a hazardous site, the Commissioner shall then issue an order and cause the premises, building or structure to be posted with a warning advising the public that the premises have been declared a hazardous site. (4) If, within thirty (30) days from issuance of the orders to the management, owner or tenant of the hazardous site, the Commissioner of Health determines that such corrective . ~ o o measures have not been undertaken, then the Commissioner of Health may order the abatement of the hazardous site as a public nuisance, which shall be enforced by mandatory or prohibitory injunction in a court of competent jurisdictionJ or may secure a court order for the cl,osure of the premises constituting the "hazardous site" until the premises, building, or structure is in compliance with the standards set forth in S2l9.520. (5) Any person who removes, destroys, or defaces warnings posted on premises shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ~; o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE July 19, 1988 Planning APPR~\j FOR AGEN~ AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Purchase property in TIF District 4~j. BY: Daryl D. Morey The city Council is requested to consider the request of Clayton Steffensen to purchase property located at PIN 34-32-24-31-0006 in the City'S Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District (see attached maps). Mr. Steffensen approached me on July 8, 1988 regarding the possibility of selling this parcel to the City. The parcel is approximately one acre in size and is located adjacent to the easternmost boundary of the Andover Commerci~l park. It is zoned I, Industrial. A note of caution: the site is in the EPA Study Area and may contain contamination. Also, a parcel larger than one acre in size would be desirable for continued commercial, development in this TIF District. Mr. Steffensen will be present at the meeting to answer any question you may have. MOTION BY TO COUNCil ACTION SECOND BY _,_"'~"""~~'~'__""'~V"_' . ... ".~--.-..... ---- -~.- .___u_n.__ _ ... co co 0> W ~ ~ ..J 0 a: a: <( ii: ::> ct W Q. CJ <( LL a: 0 a: ..J .,. <( ~ W CO GJ <( CO 0 6 d b ~ ,,: () z "-0 " ...: Cl a: ~ w <{ ~ >- lD Z W :;; J 0 0 <( :2 0 0 w a: :2 a: <( Q. 0 a.. w a: () Q. R' 'n~ ' "U'.'~ 'O^'R ~n."" ,~ o Y' ; B I'll I 1;:tV' --_______ -- '; Ii 'L- i I ;oil ~I ~ ! i ~ I. I u.... ..---.----- .--- "~.. I I c::) '~ ~ ~ ~ ._._. _n.n .pu -- -------------.-. ::-----~=.: .' ~ ,',' 1+-9 -1- w ~ k i I ~~ ~ <<S - ~ I I ' "," II ~ ~"__ ~ ~ to tl ~ ~~! I" I ' ! <H,,~~ 1111lI!~ ~ ...(,..~ m ~~il..1 ~ I ". ,~I:.~,,<<~ . ~...~' ~ ...vJ~ ~ ~~ .......~ ~ I . f! ~." 'r.!:! ~ 1 en L en ~ ~lQ lO. I '''',: ~ .'; ~ ..;:Y. !~ 'II 111(!1" ~ !'~ ~ ~ 1~ I' I'" " '. J I. _ . 1S m \V+- \ ", P!!II I~ Q:: I .:...' " llll,iij ,!~ ,~--:-" <, I pi ~~~' ~ ~ J. I ~ ,-~.,.., ffi w' h ~ ~ '" i 0 ~ I ~ '- - i I ~ i I 51 ~~ i ~ a: I ~ I in ~~ ~~ ffi. 'I 0. I . t ~ 0(:: ~~. ~ ~ I , 'e II I ~ ~ m~ ~', .. , ,I I"., 1'-.. ":'Ib-'!~' -;.~ _\'I-I~)'ol. .Iq .li,1 -H-H-{ ~ \'dl, !II ., I~'~ . ~_ ~~ ~ V' "N' ",all!2LNI ";:- 5 l'l~ ft. I- r=r'FI-!' / ,~ I, - ~~ ~ :bf;~~i':'t ".': ~ lill ~ !! I~ ~'\'I'I' '/~ ''!:! /A":,?'\; l.~~~'~~~~~...; W ~i I I-!- ~::-;:..rlffir '/~ '< ~ i\ ....,."... · ffi ~ 'i' 1 '-I ., ~~: ". ,~ ~.r;'. ~f-;- , Ii ! ~ 0 ~ ' 0::, i-;- ~~ . , 71~~. ["\A- -/-1'1 "~ t~~....~:f-T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~. . :::t~, : . IL. 7~~ '''::V ~ ~l~~~r-;-! ~ I ~ i" ~I i-!-":'I\\ . I- -;;- z~.. ./..., "5~ ~h '\tj:... ~. i- i I --::- ,..:.l::::::) ..., >-1- ~~8-1+ ql- - - ;1.l.I~. !i ' ~ ~~ i! 'I!j 111 ~,i i!jl ili"ffi'~ I (':-/:1"-r '-' k !!!!, NNO i~ ~" II i ~~' Ill). '.roT 1"'1'0"'''' ~' - ~I'( -I'~ - ~ -1'1\-:0 -1'1+ ' ',,;' :' ~I'~;!;JUi:l :1.1. , \1.-1. '.\~ ~_ \"l'\' ,,'., -", ,~ ~ . . /, . . .~~. ,. .,.r: -\ v: .......:, ,~ L w /' ',-;, '. . ~ ~ . -' -1--- ~ n I ,\. ... . r!- I ~~;;:.;; - _It.., m ~ ./:' '-t-A ' ~ - ,.' ~ iJSf!~ ; ~ ".':"7/11'1'[; .l: :FI", - ~~ - .1-- - 2 ..,.. {T . 'l'I'j. .\.1 ~ ~ - ~Jr. - ~ . y ~ ~-7.<;: lot] , ~... '- m ' '(..-1./. .1. ~L:i:l.l. L ~~ ~ I" -'-~~'lr-~""li ~ .. ~ ~ 3 \f CI) l.tJ '" I ., <.,) ~ .. .. .. .111.-:50- (6) o " , . . , , , , , '. .~ <2:.5.;; , , " , , I ~ --' - " , ,. I . . . , , . , , , , ... ... , .-.'-- ...-... ~ , ,- I , J/,/,~tJ -- -- , , , , , , ,. , , " ,- . , ". (5) , - '-1... \ ,. ...-- -.. ,.- '2V .~ ';.u"\'::~'-'- zoa.7C$ '-;-;-1\:'- ._ _ __._.___. ...____ . .~-.-~;:L1tI'.......: , , I I, " "') ,/ (1-) (4!1JO) .I,me.r f A,.fv.<: L. iesll1'u!" ~ ~ .. ~ II _ o.;w .....' .L'd.?W' \66 ~ ~ ~ ~ r: '. ~ ~ -----...- (~) (-I?bd) , /.4U . , I \ , \ , (9) ~"ttI \ I : I ~ +---1--'1- ...._... I \, .......... .2#.J'''~ .~t.....-' , . , I I I . I I \ \ \ , , -. . , , , I I , , , , I x '. , . -, ..., I I -' .-- ........... :--.... ... ... ... --------~.._--- ~J~ ... , , , \ , , I , I , , - ~ ~ '" ~ 4 (JJ) (~ &5H) , , , . , . I , . , , \ \ , , , , I , , , " . I , . \ I \ , , . , \ , \ . , , LOCATION MAP / I BARB DUERR KE-BLVO.-NW1 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE July 19, 1988 Engineering /(1" \\ BY:Todd J. Haas FOR AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Approve Handica Sa. The City Council is requested to install Handicapped Child signs in the vicinity of 16236 Tulip Street NW. SEE ATTACHED WARRANTS, LETTER, AND DIAGRAM MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ,.:. "'~=~'__"'_ ._.____".._.._.....,~.___. _ ...'"", ""~_"',_",,.J"'.' ,..'_.-'..~"._...;.'-- ..'-'. o 16 r C.i!I5Gf:- o-UT elL ~ ~ te7-~.~~ May 27, 1988 RI:~~l\~;lD - Patrick G. Hanle 16236 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, ~ll~ 55304 (6l2) 427-6394 CITY OF ,~~l"'''''\fr.p Dear 'Sirs, I would like to have handicapped children signs installed. North and South of 16236 Tulip Street in Andover, for the below reasons. !1y son Michael was hospitalized.from a car accident in January 1985 thru April 1985. He still gets physical therapy at Washington School in Anoka and Gillette Childrens Hospital in St. Paul, to improve his balance and leg movements. Michaels protective response is slower than a normal eight year olds and his ability to move out of the path of a speeding car is somewhat hampered. I realize kids are not supposed to play in the road, but it happens. , You probably realize Tulip Street is a gravel road and has a speed limit over 30 MP3. People drive recklessly and speed quite often. Therefore I ask that signs please be installed. Maybe it will help slow down traffic and save unneeded injury. Thank You, Mr. Patrick G. Hanle o 0; -,' t-_.'~.~'.,;;J~;,: ((j ((2 RECOMMENDED POLICY AND WARRAN~ for DEAF CHILD AREA SLOW CHILDREN AT PLAY BLIND CHILD AREA WARNING SIGNS GENERAL: In following the intentions of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the subject non standard signs should only be used when deemed absolutely necessary to warn traffic of existing hazardous conditions created due to limited sight distance caused by horizontal and/or vertical alignment of the roadway or other roadway environment conditions. The use of these warning sign:i- should be kept to a minimum because: .. * No factual evidence has been presented to document the subject signs success in reducing pedestrian accidents, ~ehicle operating speeds, or legal liability. Children should not be encouraged to play within the the roadway. These signs have long been rejected by traffic engineers since they are a direct and open suggestion that this behavior is acceptable. * * If signs encourage parents and children to believe they have an added degree of protection, which the signs do not and can not provide, a great disservice and false sense of security results. * Unnecessary use of these warning signs to warn of normal or non existant conditions tends to breed disrespect for these signs. * Specific standard warning signs for schools, play- grounds, parks and other recreational facilities are available for use when clearly justified. WARRANTS: Upon rece~vlng a request to install such a warning sign, an engineering evaluation should be made of the sub- ject location to determine whether that location warrants installation of such a warning sign. '~) .J o J\.\w.\"..UUUII\,...UU.......U. J. V~J,.......) U,J.l"- H(.J.... .&.U,U,,"-.,,:) r:T (~. ~; .I.' ~-O - - Such warning signs are warranted when the approach visibility of the subject location is permanently restricted to less than the required.safe stopping sight distance for the 85th percentile approach speed of traffic. 85TH PERCENTILE REQUIRED SAFE APPROACH SPEED STOPPING TIISTANCE 30 MPH 200 FEET 35 " 238 " 40 " 275 " 45 " 312 " 50 " 350 " .)I (5) o " IM/' it) (4200) (12) (i$'oo) -.:L " (.3) . ) 0) ., il?~' " pz) 'II -(1J (~r60) -~7:uk "',? -'/)'.:1, ::; ~ --etJiE"R ~. SE"q'.l,i !r ,. . .l6~. ST=-AV.t ,. N'W:-:- o @ \ \ \ c @ t; ...., ", --",-..;..;..!~' ..._....;..~~_._:;/.~~~-_..+c.--..,'r....._.__. r"-.__~"'-'~' .-..- ..-, !"""""" o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE .lnly lQ lQAA AGENDA SECTION NO. staff, Committee, Commis i ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ~"5~ APPROVED FOR AGE D11 ITEM NO. Award Bid/Hawkridge Park 5b. BY:Todd J. H The City Council is requested to award the bid for class V and clay for Hawkridge Park to Renollett Trucking. 1. 2. 3. 4. Renollett Trucking North Pine Aggregate Burt Kraabel Construction Cedar Hills Construction $4829.20 $5733.30 $5846.20 $9015.00 MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION July 19, 1988 DATE Non-Discussion Items Engineering -<i~ AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Old Colony Estates Final Plat Ga. BV:Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the final plat of Old Colony Estates. - The final plat is in conformance with the preliminary plat. It is recommended that the plat be approved subject to the following: 1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to the amount of $2400 to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer. 4. Not to be signed by the Mayor or Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.}) and a contract for improvements awarded. 5. Park dedication to be determined by the City Engineer. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTtON APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF OLD COLONY ESTATES AS BEING DEVELOPED BY THE GAUGHAN COMPANIES IN SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Old Colony Estates; and WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of Old Colony Estates. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final plat of old Colony Estates contingent upon receipt of the following: 1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to the amount of $2400 to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer. 4. Not to be signed by the Mayor or Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the improvements for the property (streets, utilities, etc.}) and a contract for improvements awarded. 5. Park dedication to be determined by the City Engineer. MOTION seconded by Councilman City Council at a 19 , with Councilmen meeting this and adopted by the day of voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: o Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Julv 19, 1988 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NO. Non-D' Engineering APPROVED FOR AGE(DA~ ITEM NO. Accept Easements 88-2 Ward Lake Drive 6b. BY:James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to accept the easement as attached for 88-2 Ward Lake Drive. These are the easements as we receive them ftom Bill. They all must be accepted before the acquisition process is completed. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY I by W""., .~::=: I STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ I o Date: ,19~ (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Lawrence J. Audette and Margaret Ruth Audette, husband and wife , Grantor (s), (marital status) hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to Citv of Andover a municipal corporation real property in Anoka , Grantee, under the laws of Mi nnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (.if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. ~~-<~ ,~~~,~. ~wrence . iiJii et e ,,\ ; "if,"d "T:,:.; ~t:)tnp H(~r(' 7)ltVLc7 ~,,( r:vith c2c L t!-tze.~ Margiret Ruth Audette STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of by Lawrence J. Audette and Mar aret Ruth Audette } S5. ,1~, and wife , Grantor (s). eTtlOtMt... AUDITTI ' : ."MY~."'''lg". . MOICA COUNTY .., CUmllllll" EICIl* Now. 7. _. Tax Statements tor the real property described in this Instrument should be sent to (Include name and address of Grantee): Lawrence J. Audette and Ruth Audette 1364 Ward Lake Drive Andover, MN 55304 Margaret: I , i I THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS): o Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., #101 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 o AGENDA SECTION NO. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Jul 19, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Items Engineering ITEM NO. Award Bid 88-1 Crosstown Blvd. 6c. BY:James E. Schrantz FOR The City Council is requested to approve the resolutio the bid for 88-1 Crosstown Boulevard. Bids are being taken Friday, July 15th at 9:00 A.M. Bid tabulations will be distributed at the meeting. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 88-1 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD FOR STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. 143-88, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law for Project No. 88-1, with results as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate as being the apparent low bidder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a contract with in the amount of $ for construction of Improvement Project No. for construction in the area of ; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond require~ents met. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a day of , 19 Meeting this with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and COancilmen votin9 against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o DATE July 19, 1988 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Items Engineering ITEM NQ Approve Plans & Specs; Order Ad for Bid 6d BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the Plans order the ad for bid for the following projects: 88-8 Old Colony Estates 88-13 Creekhaven 88-17 Red Oaks Manor 5th 88-21 Northwoods Tennis Court COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY FOR o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-8, FOR OLD COLONY ESTATES FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 123-88, adopted by the City Council on the 7th day of June, 1988, TKDA has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 88-8 for the improvements1 and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 19th day of July, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andove~, to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications for Project No. 88- 8 improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened August 12, 1988., at 9:00 A.M. at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted day of by the City Council at a Meeting this , 19 , with Councilmen voting favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-13, FOR CREEKHAVEN FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 122~88, adopted by the City Council on the 7th day of June, 1988, TKDA has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 88-13 for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 19th day of July, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andove~ to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications for Project No. 88- 13 improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOL~ED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened August 12, 1988, at 9:30 A.M. at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilman by the City Council at a and adopted day of Meeting' this , 19 , with Councilmen Councilmen voting favor of the resolution and voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-17, RED OAKS MANOR 5TH FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 140-88, adopted by the City Council 6n the 21st day of June, 1988, TKDA has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 88-17 for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 19th day of July, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications for project No. 88- 17 impr0vements. BE IT FURTHER RESOL~ED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened August 12, 1988, at 10:00 A.M., at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilman by the City Council at a and adopted day of Meeting this , 19 , with Councilmen Councilmen voting favor of the resolution and voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-21, FOR TENNIS COURT CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council action TKDA has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 88-21 Tennis Court construction. WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 19th day of July, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R~SOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the Final plans and Specifications for Project No. 88- 21 construction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened August 12, 1988, at 10:00 A.M. at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilman by the City Council at a and adopted day of Meeting this , 19 , with Councilmen Councilmen voting favor of the resolution and voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria volk - City Clerk - CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE JulV 19, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT A rbval of Minutes Administration ITEM NO. 7. BY:V. Yolk The City Council is Requested to approve the following minutes: July 5, 1988 Regular Meeting MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY