The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC June 21, 1988 '. DATE: JlInp 7.1, IqRR ,.0 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL Andover Housing and RedevplopmrntAlIthoJ:it~ l"~9tiug Minutes ",: Regular City COU""; 1 Mppt ing MiT111t"'~ Park' and RecrPRtinn r,ommic::c:;nn M;~l1t~~ Planning and Zoning rflmmission Metting MiT111tp~ Letter From Garv A. Pulford 'Sprv;rpc: r.()mmi""r~e Agerd.a Andover Housing and Redevelopment AlIthority MpetiT1g M;nllte" Article From Minnesota Real Estate Journal o . PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. THANK YOU. ... 'LO o iQ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 21, 1988-AGENDA 1:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4. Public Hearing/vacation of Service Road Easement 5. Discussion Items a. woodland Creek 2nd Addn. Final Plat b. Heliker Sketch plan c. Saarenpaa sketch plan d. Ordinance 53 Amendment e. Crosstown Boulevard Variances f. Minnesota Intrastate Special Use permit g. Orttel Lot Split h. Hidden Creek East Final plat i. Approve Regional Ponding/Coon Creek j. Approve Development Contract/Deerwood Est. k. City Hall Sidewalk Approval 1. Bond Sale m. Tonson n. Bergeron o. Gammon Bros. Special Use Permit/Mining p. Lund MSA q. Timber Trails preliminary Plat r. 6. Staff,' Committee, Commission a. park Comprehensive plan, Cont. b. Fox Meadows park Access c. Approve overnight Camping/Woodland Creek d. Council Salaries e. CDBG Joint Powers Agreement f. Ordinance 11 Amendment g. Computer proposal h. Fire Dept. Report on Junkyards & Tonson i. 7. Non-Discussion Items a. Declare Adequacy of Petition/Bent Creek b. Declare Adequacy of Petition/R. Sonsteby c. Declare Adequacy of Pet./Receive Feasibility/88-17/Red Oaks 5th d. Final payment/86-19; 87-6 e. Approve plans & Specs/88-1 f. Award Bids/88-2; 88-11 g. Award Bid/Hidden Creek Park Parking Lot h. Approve ROW/88-1; 87-11 i. Approve Resolutions, Project 88-19, Woodland Creek Phase II j. 8. Approval of Minutes 9. Approval of Claims 10. Adjournment o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ITEM '-1-. NO. Public Hearing/vacatio of Service Rd. Easemen BY: James E. Schrantz A public hearing has been called to consider the vacation of the service road platted along county Road 18 from just south of 138th Avenue to just north of Yukon Street. See attached map. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY / ", ~ I;; ll,~)rl~ ot~, ", tr~~ " o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 Discussion Items ITJ.M Woodland Creek 2nd Addn Final Plat Engineering -(1~ APPROVED FOR AG (1 AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is reqtiested to approve the final plat of Woodland Creek 2nd Addition. - The final plat is in conformance with the preliminary plat. Park dedication has been paid in full. It is recommended that the plat be approved subject to the following: 1. The City Attorney has presented a favorable title opinion.. 2. Security to the amount of $2250 to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer. 4. Not to be signed by the Mayor or Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.}). 5. Receiving a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF WOODLAND CREEK 2ND AS BEING DEVELOPED BY LAWRENCE B. CARLSON, PRESIDENT OF WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT CORP. IN SECTIONS 28, 29, 32 AND 33, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Woodland Creek; and WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of Woodland Creek; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney has presented a Favorable Title Opinion on the property being platted; and WHEREAS, the park dedicatio~ has been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final plat of Woodland Creek 2nd Addition contingent ?pon receipt of the following: 1. The City Attorney has presented a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to the amount of. $2250 to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer. 4. Not to be signed by the Mayor or Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.}). 5. Receiving a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. MOTION seconded by Councilman City Council at a Meeting this and adopted by the day of 19 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl- Mayor o ATTEST: James E. Schrantz - Deputy City Clerk ~-- lVdOOUl-V..o C(lP:-K:.. Z~ June 15, 1988 , Mr. James Schrantz City Administrator City of Andover 685 N.W. Crosstown Boulevard Andover, Minnesota 55304 Dear Jim, In regard to the development of Woodland Creek Second addition, we at Woodland can assure the City that the permit we are currently applying for with the Army Corps of Engineers, in noway affects the platting or construction of Woodland Creek Second Addition. This permit is a process we need for approval of the golf cours~ only. This basically affects the land below the flood plain elevation of 866 and has no effect on the upland or residential portion of the subdivision. Thank you for your attention in this matter. If you have further questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, ~J;rJl~~ ~j (dA) Byron D. Westlund Vice President Development and Sales BDW:jh o . 830 West Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 427-7500 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21. 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA L Engineering ~1'~ ITEM NO. Heliker Sketch plan BY: Todd J. Haas The city Council is requested to table the item until the July 5, 1988 City Council meeting. The planning and zoning Commissions would like to review comments from the Anoka County Highway Department before the Planning commission makes a recommendation to the City Council. The owner of the property is proposing to front 6 lots onto county Road 58, Ordinance 10 Section 9.02 (c) states that no preliminary plat shall be approved wherein lots front on the right-of-way of state, county, or city arterial or collector roads. A service road along county roads is possible MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items Engineering ITEM NO, Saarenpaa Sketch Plan BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan of the Saarenpaa property. The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the proposed sketch plan. Their comments are as follows: General Comments: *The proposed sketch plan is zoned R-1, single family rural. . Minimum lot size is 2 - 1/2 actes of which 39,000 square feet must be buildable. *The proposed sketch plan appears to meet all the requirements relating to lots size. All lots shall front on 153rd Lane NW, Other Comments: *The developer/owner of the property is considering to split 2 - 1/2 acres off from the 20 acres at this time. If Lot 3 of Block 1 or Lot 3 of Block 2 are being considered to be developed, the extension and construction of 153rd Lane NW from Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition would be necessary. NOTE-The property owners, after discussion with the Planning Commission, are considering to develop 5 acre metes and bounds survey. See attached drawings for possible lot configuration. If the property owner uses the 153rd Lane cul-de-sac, would there be possible assessments for using the road? COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o '" ~ ~ '" ~ ~ lU ~ ...l .... ~ <( ~ 'ol) ~ <( ..... l-... ""II ::t ~ \!) fn ~ "< '" l'.: ~ ~ "> ~ lit k: <\ '4 -Q ~'<( 'ot ~~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ o i N ~ ~ 15 ACf2.E-A-5 h. \U 1.\1 I ~ '1\ III --.I <( S- A eRE AS ~ t::- ":t: ~ ~ O~ , 5 I+CR-EAS ~ ~ ...... 13 ~ Vi /5" AOecA5 III --.I .q: ~ "- "- :t '" -- ~ ... o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION June 21, 1988 DATE AGENDA SECTION NQ Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT FOR 8d. Planning ITEM NQ Ordinance 53 Amendment BY: Daryl D. Morey 1l'\t7)V\ The city Council is requested to approve the attached amendment to Ordinance 53, the Dog Ordinance. The City Council referred this item to the Planning Commission for review. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment at their May 10, 1988 meeting. A summary of the changes incorporated in the proposed ordinance amendment are as follows: 1. section 1 - Changed the existing definition of a biting dog. Moved the definition of nuisance from Section 7 to the definitfon section and alphabetized the definitions. 2. Section 5 - Added the wording "if the dog is under the control of a responsible person" to the last paragraph. 3. Section 16 - Added wording regarding "the threat of an attack" to appropriate sentences in this section. Added the wording "The owner of the dog shall be notified that said dog shall be leashed, kennelled, or otherwise contained at all times" as a procedure to be followed in the event a dog is classified as a biting dog. Added the wording "or other domestic animal" to the fourth paragraph on page 6. The Planning Commission finds that the changes in the amendment will strengthen the existing ordinance and will make it easier to enforce and control dogs and cats within the City. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 53 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.5 (ADOPTED MAY 6, 1969), ORDINANCE NO. 14 (ADOPTED FEBRUARY 20, 1973), ORDINANCE NO. 20 (ADOPTED MAY 14, 1974), AND ORDINANCE NO. 38 (ADOPTED MARCH 1, 1977). The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain: This ordinance shall be known as "An Ordinance Licensing and Regulating the Keeping of Dogs, providing for Impoundm~nt of Certain Dogs, and Providing a Penalty for violation". SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS a. Animal Shelter: Any premises designated by the City Council for the purpose of impounding and caring the dogs held under the authority of this ordinance. , c. Kennel: Any person, partnership or corporation engaged in the business of breeding, buying, selling or boarding dogs; provided that such person, partnership ar corporation customarily owns or boards more than three (3) dogs over six (6) months of age. d. Nuisance: It shall be considered a nuisance for any animal to habitually or frequently bark or cry; to frequent school grounds, parks, or public beaches while unrestrained; to chase vehicles; to molest or annoy any person if such person is not on the property of the owner or custodian of the animal; to molest, defile, destroy any property, public or private; or to leave excrement on any property, public or private. e. Officer: Any law enforcement officer of the City and persons designated by the City to assist in the enforcement of this ordinance. f. Owner: Any person, firm, partnership, or corporatian owning, harboring, or keeping a dog or dogs. g. Restraint: A dag shall be deemed to be under restraint if it is on the premises of its owner or if accompanied by a responsible person and under that person's effective cQntrol. , h. Section No. 7 through Section No. 23, with the exception of Section No. 18, shall apply to the regulating and keeping of cats, providing for the impoundment of cats, and providing for o o violation thereof. All references to dogs shall also apply to cats in the aforementioned sections of this ordinance. (12-1-81) SECTION 2. LICENSE REQUIRED No person shall own, keep, harbor or have custody of any dog over six (6) months of age without first obtaining a license therefor from the City Clerk of his/her agent. Applications for license shall be made on forms prescribed by the City Clerk, which form shall set forth: (1) the name, address and telephone number of the owner; (2) the name and address of the person making the application, if other than the owner; and (3) the breed, sex, and age of the dog for which a license is sought. No license shall be issued to any person other than the owner except upon the written request of the owner. I SECTION 3. REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSE The license shall expire on the 31st day of May in each odd numbered year and shall be issued only upon payment of the license fee as set by City Council resolution. All licenses issued for a period of less than 2 years shall be pro rated on an annual basis. Every applicatio~ for a license shall be accompanied by a certificate from a qualified veterinarian showing that the dog to be licensed has been given a vaccination against rabies to cover the licensing period. ," No license shall be granted for a dog which has not been vaccinated against rabies for a time sufficient to cover the licensing period. Vaccination shall be performed only by a doctor qualified to practice veterinary medicine in the state in which the dog is vaccinated. SECTION 4. RESTRICTIONS ON NUMBER OF ANIMALS No person, firm or corporation shall harbor more than 3 dogs over the age of 6 months in anyone family residence unit or place of business except pursuant to Section 18. SECTION 5. RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITED No dog shall be permitted to run at large within the limits of this City. Running loose on the owner's property, or property under the owner's control, will not be considered running at large if the dog is under the control of a responsible person. SECTION 6. DOGS ON LEASH The restriction imposed by Section 5 shall not prohibit the appearance of any dog upon streets or public property when such dog is on a leash and accompanied by a responsible person or accompanied by and under tPe control and direction of a responsible person so as to be as effectively by command as by leash. Page 2 ~ l o SECTION 7. OBLIGATION TO PREVENT NUISANCES It shall be the obligation and responsibility of the owner or custodian of any animal in the City, whether permanently or temporarily therein, to prevent such animal from committing any act which constitutes a nuisance. Failure on the part of the owner or custodian to prevent his animals from committing an act of nuisance shall be subject to the penalty hereinafter provided. SECTION 8. IMPOUNDMENT Unrestrained dogs may be taken by any officer as defined and .impounded in an animal shelter and there humane manner. Impounded dogs shall be kept for not five regular business days unless reclaimed prior to their owner as provided hereafter. hereinbefore confined in a less than that time by I SECTION 9. NOTICE OF IMPOUNDMENT Upon taking up and impounding any dog, the poundmaster shall within 1 day thereafter have posted in the City Hall a notice of impounding in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF IMPOUNDING DOG: Date , 19 To Whom it May Concern: We have this day taken up and impounded in the pound of the City at , a dog answering the following description: Sex Color Breed Approximate Age Name of Owner (if known) Notice is hereby given redeemed on or before 19 , the same will be by ordinance. that unless said dog is claimed and o'Clock .M., on the day of sold or humanely destroyed as pravided Signed: poundmaster/City Official If the owner of said dog be known, written notice of impounding, in lieu of posted notice, shall be given the owner thereof either by mail or personal service. The date of sale or humane destruction of the dog shall be the 6th day after posting of the notice or giving notice unless the animal shelter at which the dog is impounded is closed to the public, in which case it shall be the following day. (December 1, 1981) SECTION 10. REDEMPTION Any dog may be reclaimed from the animal shelter by its owner within the time specified in the notice by the payment to the Clerk or her designate of the license fee (if not paid for the current period) with an im~ounding fee as set by City Council resolution. Notwithstanding this section, the owner shall remain subject to all penalties contained in this ordinance. Page 3 o o SECTION 11. DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED DOGS Any dog which is not claimed as provided in Section 9, within five (5) days, after posting of the impoundment notice, may be sold for not less than the expenses incurred for impoundment, if not requested by a licensed educational or scientific institution under Minnesota Law. All sums received from the sale of dogs under this section shall be deposited into the General Fund of the City. Any qog which is not claimed by the owner or sold or transferred to a licensed educational or scientific institution shall be painlessly and humanely destroyed and buried by the poundmaster. (12-1-81) SECTION 12. PERMISSIBLE RETURN OF UNRESTRAINED DOG , Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8, if an animal is found unrestrained and its owner can be identified and located, such animal need not be impounded but may, instead, be taken to the owner. In such cases, however, proceedings may be taken against the owner for violation of this ordinance. SECTION 13. OWNER OBLIGATION FOR PROPER CARE No owner shall fail to provide any animal with sufficient good and wholesome food and water, proper shelter and protection from the weather, veterinary care when needed to prevent suffering, and with humane care an~ treatment. SECTION 14. MISTREATMENT OF DOGS No persan shall beat, treat cruelly, torment or otherwise abuse any animal, or cause or permit any dog fight. No owner of a dog shall abandon such animal. SECTION 15. MUZZLING PROCLAMATION Whenever the prevalence of rabies renders such action necessary to protect the public health and safety, the Mayor shall issue a proclamation ordering every person owning or keeping a dog to muzzle it securely so that it cannot bite. No person shall violate such proclamation and any unmuzzled dog unrestrained during the time fixed in the proclamation shall be subject to impoundment as heretofore provided, and the owner of such dog shall be subject to the penalty hereinafter provided. SECTION 16. CLASSIFICATION OF A BITING DOG In the event that a complaint is received that an attack or the threat of an attack has occurred which, in the judgement OI the City Clerk, accurred under circumstances which would justify the classification of the dog as a biting dog under this ordinance, the City Clerk shall place the issue on the next available agenda of the City Council, and shall notify the owner of the dog, in writing, of the time and place of the Council meeting at which the matter will be heard. The notice shall inform the owner that a request has been made to classify the dog as a biting dog, and the ~ity Council shall hear such facts as any interested parties may wish to present, and shall, by resolution, determine whether or not to classify the dog as a biting dog. Such a determination shall be made upon the basis of whether or Page 4 o o not the criteria as found in the definition of the term "biting dog" have been met. No variances shall be permitted from the strict terms of said definition. In the event a dog is classified as a "biting dog", the following procedures shall be implemented: 1. The owner of the dog shall be notified, in writing, by certified mail or through personal delivery of correspondence, that the dog has been classified as a "biting dog", and shall be furnished with a copy of the Resolution. 2. If the dog was impounded, and photographs or other identifying characteristics obtained, such photographs or other identifying materials shall be placed in a permanent file indexed under the owner's name. If the dog is not impounded, the owner shall be notified that the dog's license shall be revoked unless, within ten (10) days after receipt of the notice, the owner furnishes to the city suitable photographs or other identifying materials of the dag, or makes the dog available for the taking of photographs by City staff for insertion in the permanent files. 3. The City Clerk shall maintain a permanent file of all dogs classified as "biting dog" indexed under the owner'~ name. 4. shall times. Additional Attacks. If a dog already classified as a "biting dog" threatens or commits another attack under circumstances which would qualify the classification of the dog as a "biting dog" a second time, the following procedures and sanctions shall apply: 1. Upon receipt of such a complaint, the city Clerk shall cause the issue to be placed upon the next available agenda of the City Council. Notice shall be sent to the owner of the dog, by certified mail or personal delivery, requesting that the owner appear at the City Council meeting, to show cause why the dog should not be classified as a nuisance and dealt with accordingly. 2. At its next available Council meeting, the City Council shall hear the facts as presented by all interested parties, and shall, at that time, make a determination as to whether or not the dog shall be classified as a nuisance. The City Council shall classify the dog as a nuisance if it finds that the second attack occurred under circumstances which would qualify the dog for classification as a "biting dog" as defined in this ordinance. 3. If a dog is classified as a nuisance, the owner shall be notified, in writing, by certified mail or personal delivert, that the dog has been classified as a nuisance, and the owner shall further be notified that the dog must either be destroyed or removed from the City Limits of the City of Andover, permanently, within 48 hours after receipt of the notice. The owner sh~ll further be notified that the dog's license has been revoked permanently. Page 5 ,.- o o Violations. Any person who owns, keeps, harbors, or is in actual physical control of a dog which has been declared a nuisance shall be in violation of this ordinance. Any person who owns, keeps, harbars, or is in actual physical control of any dog within the corporate limits of the City of Andover, for any period of time, which dog has had its license revoked, shall be in violation of this ordinance. Nothing in this ordinance, not the enactment of any of the procedures herein enumerated, shall be deemed to limit, alter or impair the right of the City or any person to seek enforcement through criminal prosecution of any violation of this Ordinance, and the fact that the City may be pursuing classification of a dog under this portion of the Ordinance shall not prevent or prohibit the prosecution at the same time of an owner of a dog for permitting a dog to run at large under facts arising from the same occurence as that which generated the classification procedures. The classification procedure shall be in addition to, and not in place of, criminal prosecution under other portions of this or other ordinances. whenever any owner of a dog shall learn that such dog ha~ bitten, attacked or threatened any human being or other domestic animal, such owner shall immediately impound said dog in a place of confinement where it cannot escape or have access to any human being or other animal, and shall also immediately notify any peace officer, dog catchei, or other person authorized by the City Council. Whenever such authorized person, peace officer or dog catcher shall learn that any human being has been bitten by any dog within the City, he shall ascertain the identity of such dog and the persons who might meet the definition of owner as found elsewhere in this Ordinance, and shall immediately direct such person to forthwith impound such dog as required herein. If, in the opinion of such peace officer, dog catcher, or. other authorized person shall transport such dog t.o the pound under contract to the City. Any dog so impounded shall be kept continuously confined for a period of fourteen (14) days from the day the dog bit a human being. The cost of such impoundings and confinement shall be borne by the owner of the dog, if such owner be found, which costs shall be as stated for impounding and confinement elsewhere in this Ordinance. Upon learning that a dog has bitten a human being, the peace officer, dog catcher, or other authorized person, shall immediately notify the City Health Officer, and inform him of the place where the dog is impounded. It shall be the duty of the City Health Officer to inspect said dog from time to time during its period of 14 days confinement, and to determine whether or not such dog may be infected with rabies. For this purpose, he shall have accesrto the premises where such dog is kept at all reasonable hours, and may take possession of the dog and confine it as such place as he deems appropriate, at the expense of the owner. If an owner has impounded a dog pursuant to the request of a peace officer, dog catcher, or other authorized person, the owner shall promptly transport spid dog to the pound under contract to the city for the purposes stated above. If the owner refuses to do so, and refuses to allow the peace officer, dog catcher or Page 6 o o other authorized person to transport the dog to the contract pound, the owner shall be in violation of this ordinance. Injunctive Relief. In addition to the criminal sanctions provided in Section 15 above, in the event that any dog is declared a nuisance, and such dog is not either destroyed or removed from the City Limits of the City of Andover within 48 hours after receipt of the notice of Declaration of Nuisance, the city shall, in addition and not in place of any criminal remedies, have a civil remedy of injunctive relief, and may apply to the Court of competent jurisdiction for an order compelling the destruction or removal of said dog from the corporate limits of the City of Andover. SECTION 17. SUMMARY DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN DOGS 1 Whenever an officer has reasonable cause to believe that a particular dog presents a clear and immediate danger to residents of the City because it is infected with rabies (hydrophobia) or because of a clearly demonstrated vicious nature, the officer, after making reasonable attempts to impound such dog, may summarily destroy said dog. SECTION 18. KENNELS No person, firm or corporation shall maintain in this city a kennel without secur~ng a license therefore from the City Council and meeting the criteria as set forth in Ordinance 8. The license fee shall be as set by City Council resalution. SECTION 19. APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS The City Council may from time to time appoint such persons as may be necessary to assist the police officers of the City in the enforcement of this ordinance. Such persons shall have police powers insofar as is necessary to enforce this ordinance, and no person shall interfere with, hinder, or molest them in the exercise of such powers. SECTION 20. NON-RESIDENTS The sections of this ordinance requ1r1ng a license shall not apply to non-residents of the City, provided that dogs of such owners shall not be kept in the city longer than thirty (30) days without a license and shall be kept under restraint. SECTION 21. PENALTY Any person who shall violate any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished as defined by State Law. SECTION 22. REPEAL Ordinance No.5, adopted May 6, 1969, Ordinance No. 14, adopted February 20, 1973, Ordinance No. 20, adopted May 14, 1974, and Ordinance No. 38, adopted September 7, 1976 are hereby repealed. ' SECTION 23. EFFECTIVE DATE Page 7 o This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of February, 1981. CITY OF ANDOVER JERRY WINDSCHITL Mayor ATTEST: PATRICIA K. LINDQutST City Clerk o Page 8 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT 5e, Planning ITEM NQ Crosstown Boulevard Variances Daryl D. Morey \ BY: BY: The City Council is requested to approve the attached reso for front yard setback variances for five properties on Cr Boulevard between 139th and 140th Avenues. FOR Ordinance 8, Sections 4.15 and 6.02, requires a 40 foot setback adjacent to a major arterial or thoroughfare in R-4 zoning districts. These variances are being requested by the City due to the widening and re-alignment of Crosstown Boulevard. I have attached the street address, PIN, and front yard setback variance for each of the five properties. This information was supplied by TKDA. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE REQUESTS BY THE CITY OF ANDOVER FOR FOR FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT PIN: 33-32-24-11- 0010, PIN 33-32-24-11-0009, PIN 34-32-24-22-0025, PIN 33-32-24-11- 0006, PIN 34-32-24-22-0007. WHEREAS, after such review the Planning and zoning Commission has recommended approval of the request, the following reasons: 1) Pursuant to Ordinance 8, Sections 4.15 and 6.02, a 40-foot setback is required along the arterial street Crosstown Boulevard~ 2) With the realignment and improvement of Crosstown Boulevard, additional right of way was necessary and thus causes these parcels to be non- conforming~ 3) The variances requested meet the hardship criteria in that they were not self generated and the variances allow for the reasonable use of the land. This is especially true if any of the residential building sites were so destroyed and would have to be rebuilt~ 4) The variances do not interfere with the traffic flo~ of Crosstown Boulevard and will in fact have a beneficial effect upon the public safety of the users of Crosstown Boulevard~ and 5) There was no negative public input at this time. WHEREAS, The City Council is in agreement with the recommendation given by the Planning and Zoning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the variance request of the City of Andover from the provisions of Ordinance No.8, Sections 4.15 and 6.02 for front yard setback for properties located at: PIN 33-32-24-11-0010, PIN 33-32-24-11-0009, PIN 34-32-24-22-0025, PIN 33-32-24-11-0006 PIN 34-32-24-22-0007. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1988. CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Volk - City Clerk o ~ o CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W. ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 Variance i ss-no; VARIANCE REQUEST FORM Property Address 14006, 14018, 14031, 14034, 14041 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. Legal Description of Property: (see attached) (Fill in whichever is appropriate) Lot Block Addi tion Plat Parcel PIN (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal): Description of Request Specific Hardship Front yard setback variances will be needed due to the widening of Crosstown Boulevard as part of the continuing uwrading of this road as well as part of the COunc.y Road 18 Lt:l d,11'::jlIlLII;:ut PLUJ~t fUL Ull:~ puLl';'\.,: hedlUl, bc1f",Ly auU w",lfCl.Ll:::. Section of Ordinance 4.15, 6.02 Current Zoning R-4 ********************************************************************** Name of Applicant City of Andover Address 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. Home Phone Business Phone 755-5100 Signature Date ********************************************************************** Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Home Phone Business Phone Signature Date ********************************************************************** Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structureS affected showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent street names; location and use of existing structures within 350 feet. o .... Application Fee: Single Family Other Requests Filing Fee: $40.00 $65.00 $10.00 Date Paid waived Receipt i o VARIANCE #88-5 (CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD) Street Address PIN Front Yard Setback 14006 Crosstown Boulevard 33-32-24-11-0010 39' 14018 Crosstown Boulevard 33-32-24-11-0009 34' 14031 Crosstown Boulevard 34-32-24-22-0025 34' 14034 Crosstown Boulevard 33-32-24-11-0006 22' 14041 Crosstown Boulevard 34-32-24-22-0007 33' o , UI "V ',I , Vi"', I I ~ I , I I '~,' /1 J, ___ I I~ '! ], -I-----!--~ !--- 1 ' . 1 : : ~. 1 I If 1 ",', ~ nil, ! :.t."NN~', ::~: II: r~~~.y; :S!' .' II~,: .:- ,1/,1-1 _,5 ~ : i.:: OAK . "E' /./ I' 1 BA, . :t:: ~,. ~o'~,/, ' I!: z I"" a ---; !, "" , . . ,~ 1..",;';T.iij .", 1 -- ~.- n' i i....1 .~::~ ,'I III II I i. ,~, ~ ! II iJ~~ ~1 ~; I ' i li~ I I:,,' IIIII ;' I;' I 1/ Ip . ' " _,,.;,~~.~i __ ~ -: Iii i I \ 1 I "-r I ---i--- i-+--- I ': :....~ 1- I ! I ]\1 _ 1,),1'1,1 ~. - :~H~'"'""""' ~ ! · It" !_ _.. L!/ 1N~",,'I,r;t'\, .:." ~I'='" ' ! 9' ,'r"." - I ...R41 .. .r.r.tlIS&-,..,... " ...,:;;., '. ".: - I:.'t~(!,n . 1 ~ADDITION"" ,"'~GI' ,', ", = ': ,~".'!l."",fl'Hili I 1 F':;:I'~":f"""~; ';~ :: : H~S" "'; 1 .;pj, ~ ',,' / , " " .. . 'j ,,: 1.\.1, I ':i: ~ ~ ' " ~~ " - ~~ i : L....;J '(>---------1 u '; : ';::: ":, 1"1~-- . r'iffill ---I ~ l : 1:1 ~,"'UIIIlOO "..J D ..1;;' I - .. ,~, ,II'( ~& }JJ f/,/ololl ,I,U,I.,,, ;:'::.. . .., ;.:.iiiW n ~'- ~ II~ l-~'k"; - I - ul--1:1 ~ ' V,;>; , ,,' ,.' ,'i ,I I 1 ~ "(~ ',:'" ';:,*Itk:,',~ - ~ : f WA '"r:S- ". I ' '-_ .J ,I t I 1 I !~ :~'~ fiI:-ojy.,~l+l- : - 'GARWEN-l! i- --./+ '~:~(T"" , .{"-*i!'f,, .~ : ':' I . I . ~ I Ii I 10 ,.>,---,' ''t". .d'~~' ~ I 'AC/ ES' I I r lrl , '" I "y.. ... ..","~ :>.lIMIT~ ~ THe- ~,...n'''-- , II, I .' jl I c ^I, Y 0' . _. ITY OF N OV-R ----, I vi i. r COOf"-I t(j.l.PiDS; ANOKA CO. I I-- EST-'rES 1 ) 1_ I , '1 RD.. -I , "'-.<u!'~M~ I I' ""'ATF(S' l i I I - -- - ::J gfTY I ALL ! I~ . ..... i. ! ,tl, , o --f--- ) ',1:>. ~i:Y 1 ! 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 ~DtfdtAlllg I sJJ,hl. ~ I~ "h~I~.11Q1I 1\1 .;\/~"s -~ - '{' - [ ,~, ~ I ,1lJt'/1 , . . i.~~r' i~~iS:7 [W'i"' . !l~-!I;II . I I , " I: T~r~ . ' o '" LOCATION MAP @ o ...-~_.- ~ @ J~ IU~ (H) (1) (IN) Jt1lks " I ,N"/~<f t: ~UN ;'/6. (7"-' -V '":>:> ~ ,... f (t) ~.~ ~)~>I;! "~i::': ~~. utIJr I (3!) !l 1. 11'11' Hit' lr>>.Ir !-II'"'' (I'I) I ~ ." ,. f. ...". 1) ,.:,,~: 1001 .'~' . \' . -., ~.l1 "iD ~'..J~, t. tHAL' '::' , . '.'.";, I .~.1rJtJ . ,. /14 (1) .o~~.:~.- . ~QK. " : .. t'ti , 'Hop. ~ -... ., ~ (2) ',; d: ~ ~ (/'.141". ~:. ------ . 6"'~ ,_~ '.J~"'~;' f "-" .:. /~" .' ". '-. '- .t~' (1'1) /<1"'" , .,:.; ".lJ , " , , , " , , , , '\ r;y \ SITE. MAP' . , , ; ~ .......200 , ~ .-.J/"'-" /J) (Pll) 11.44#. ....J/II..... ........ .....~ i. ,. . , o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPRO~VOR AGENDA BY: .\= Planning ITEM NQ MITS Special Use Permit, Continued BY: Dar 1 D. More ~ The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution for a special use permit for Minnesota Intrastate Transmission Systems to allow a public utility use (a natural gas pipeline) not located in the public right-of-waYi as required by Ordinance 8, Section 7.01 and Section 7.03. The resolution was revised to incorporate the changes requested by Council at the last meeting, on June 7, 1988. This item was tabled at the June 7 meeting in order to allow 'the full Council to vote on this request and to allow the petitioners to gather more information regarding the proposed route of the pipeline. Please refer to the June 7 agenda packet for more information on this item. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY c o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MINNESOTA INTRASTATE TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS TO ALLOW PLACEMENT OF A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE ON PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 133RD AVENUE TO 181ST AVENUE. WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice the%eof, the Planning and zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing to consider the request of Minnesota Intrastate Transmission Systems for a Special Use Permit; and WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing the Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the request, citing the following: 1) The health and welfare of the community has been considered in that the applicant has gone through the proper processes in obtaining an environmental impact statement, having worked with the County of Anoka, the Department of Natural Resources and other applicable governmental units that would have input regarding 'the placement of the pipeline. Further, there was a considerable amount of effort and energy placed in making certain this pipeline is safe; 2) The pipeline is intended to serve the Minnegasco facility in Coon Rapi'ds and is not intended to be a franchise provider for private gas companies along that pipeline; and 3) The impact of the pipeline will not have any affect on the scenic view of the properties and the property values will be negotiated with the applicant. WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the reasons set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby approve the request of Minnesota Intrastate Transmission Systems for a Special Use Permit with the following conditions: 1) Storage of pipe along the pipeline route shall not create a safety hazard for the citizens of Andover; 2) Storage of pipe along the pipeline route be conducted for a maximum of 12 months; 3) The site of pipe storage be restored as to vegetation and contours, if applicable; and 4) The pipeline construction be done in such a manner to minimize to the greatest possible extent the effect of oak wilt on the adjacent properties. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 19 CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: James E. Schrantz - Deputy City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION June 21, 1988 DATE APPROV~\.FOR AGENDoo BY'~' 7 The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution for a lot split by Ken Orttel. AGENDA SECTION NO, Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT bo. Planning ITEM NO. Orttel Lot Split - BY: Daryl D. Morey ~ This item was tabled at the last meeting, on June 7, 1988. please refer to the June 7 agenda packet for complete information on this item (5.t.). MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA .r9 RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT AS REQUESTED BY KEN ORTTEL FOR PROPERTY IN SECTION 33-32-24. WHEREAS, the planning and zoning Commission has reviewed the request of Ken Orttel to subdivide into two separate parcels pursuant to the requirements of Ordinance 40, property described as all that part of Lot 1, Auditor's subdivision Number 137, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 1, said point being the Northwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 32, Range 24; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 416.63 feet, more or less, to a point distant 200 feet North from the Northwest corner of Lot 2 in said Auditor's Subdivision No. 137 as measured along said West line of Lot 1; thence East and parallel with the North line of said Lot 1 to the centerline of Coon Creek; thence Northerly along the centerline of Coon Creek to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 1; thence West along the North line af said Lot 1 to the point of commencement; and WHEREAS, after such review the Planning and zoning CommisSion has set forth a recommendation for approval of the lot split for the following reason: each of the resultant lots would meet the criteria set forth in Ordinance 40 for the zoning district in which they lie; and WHEREAS, The Planning and zoning Commission understands that the smaller of the two parcels (easterly parcel) cannot access directly onto Bunker Lake Boulevard under its present configuration and should the owner request a building permit for that parcel in the future, a service road would have to be constructed pursuant to Ordinance 10, Section 9.03 (h); and WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the recommendation of the Planning and zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby approve the lot split request of Ken Orttel to subdivide into two parcels the property described above, subject to the following: 1) the applicant supply the City with new legal descriptions for the property to be filed with the County; 2) the applicant pay the appropriate park dedication fees; and 3) the applicant deed ta the County an additional 27 feet of easement along Bunker Lake Boulevard for road purposes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this , 1988. day of CITY OF ANDOVER .0 ~. ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion I Engineering ",1'(\ ITEM NO. Hidden Creek East Final plat BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the final plat of Hidden Creek East - Phase I. The final plat is in conformance with the preliminary plat. It is recommended that the plat be approved subject to the following: 1. The City Attorney has preaented a favorable title opinion. 2. Security to the amount of $2750 to cover legal, . engineering, street sign and installation costs. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer. 4. Park dedicati'on for the fi rst phase (20.7 acres) will be cash in lieu of land for the 1st phase of $2042. 5. Not to be signed by the Mayor or Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc...}). COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o c CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF Hidden creek East Phase I Good Value Homes IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 32 RANGE 24. WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of Hidden Creek East; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final plat of Hidden Creek East contingent upon receipt of the following: 1. The City Attorney has presented a favorable Title opinion on the property being platted. 2. Security in the amount of $2750.00 to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is determined by the City Engineer. 4. Park dedication for the first phase (20.7 acres) will be cash in lieu of land for the !st phase of $2042. 5. Not to be signed by the Mayor or clerk until there is a executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total cost for the improvements for the property (streets, utilities, etc...)) MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council of the city of Andover at a this , 1988, with Councilman day of voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry windschitl- Mayor James E. Schrantz- Deputy City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION June 21, 1988 DATE AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGQ~ BY'. / Discussion Items 5. Engineering -(S~ ITEM NQ Approve Regional Ponding/Coon Creek BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the proposed areas for regional ponding within the City of Andover limits. The City has already been working with the Coon Creek Watershed Board for regional ponds. Areas would include Winslow Hills, Old Colony Estates and Oak Bluff 2nd Addition. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY f ~r ,~,~.~., ~~' r~ :~i~ti ;.li. "J~., " ..' )00 .f. ,i!. _ I' . ::: .:. ~:i I ,.! . , !"1lI IJo ~' " !,' ~ ~~", . ~ d ' ~"""~ :E. ". .:< o. c;j ,c tJ ::!: .~~li.,.; "" .1';.' ... . )0 ..:: .. I.. ,.. '.." I ".....t . . .-4",:, . rtN I I 1 \ , )N NC.1 . ~ f?1 I fERN nn I ~ f. I~ I ' I I , , - ..-, k- . 't - '~ . I ",~---if I :>i. 1 I I , ,:1 I '~ !~I' , o o ~ J I ( ,',.... ."...." ''':'', ....,-,..""'"__..O'"'b..'"r.'~.""""'~""""....1 .!, 'I~ rod.llf.,"".... -. .":" ...i'f~ ..1"" .: t\)1 ; i~' ~ ;:ll.'!.! N . " J ;~~;:~i?:j",,,-"~,,, "to I l"I~:lt~H f!:....... ~....~:,': i..1 " : .":") ..._tJ -~; :..~.,.c,...j~J.~J. :, i, J '. '" i ~ . . "',' .-" ,.. ... .... 'llf , " , ii, ";-' HANSON BLVD. ;> Z (] 10 < m , ;0, \11, . r3-\ I tal ~~~e: I' r""" . < (] , . :..~~()) 1ft bZ < o. ;,.~, . . ...~ U\;-f!.. .f; ,.~ . \'; ?: 'Jo .~..} - 'i. .... ~ "" " 1;.-',,\ ~ !:. ., ~ . RAlf{\{: HOA6 " '<, b~ .~;~ ,.' 0) .i~ "'VI "'IJI 1J;'!' '" (}1 " ' - VI OJ ~c 21. ^l .m .JJ r )>- .^ m , Jf 'f'i' 'OJ r <. . 1<:0 "'~ Q , I'. (U"'........'tl. 1fl_"~.'I:. ..", , ~ "'-" ; - ~ .-:::: ~ ~., r'~ ... ~ ~ ,. ~',~ 'J !'Ilil I' o,l I I':""" .' ;. ~ ~~~1u~n_ u_ '-:, __ .. 1~. -v ,'7 t.-' '" ' (' j j ~~ ( ~);, ....!- .. ~'" 1ft ;<:! :\:...~ < t.t:l! .-4 . '" ;. ~I' -<: Iii. ., :.. 0 :c' OJ 0 (")/;" r'I ~ /;. ,~;.C.~. . ~~ ~ r~ o. <liO I\) ~ : ~&;J \1-' . ~~f ~ '~ Wz JRC/O! Om . <liO ~g: ;..,.: I . g;-t...., ", i tt I L.ot. ." '1" ,: t' U ".. j-. ROUND 1../ , .' ~.. ., f: Ii ~ !: i"' ; " , 1: 1" r..J '.' 0' '0 .... '" --J ::IE '1.~ .;' ", C,,) ... ,., , .. '" ,I:, ::IE;: III"""'''''''''''''''''"""""",! J f . . . fi,.." , "1"\ , ;!1" ~ ~ i, ': ,: i' "~~r'V .... '" .... %.i2' ~ ~. r.:~ if, -..t. _ ~ ~:..... .~... _.~.__ J .~ :'i . . . ~ , l , I\)CENTRAq\A VE. _ ~ ......~ ,- ...... ..., 'II' ......;--:.:~'l'tt.... '\\ . .~ r' ,,,!,t I" ,~ ......... ~. -- \~ ,_~\IJI i t'i.! ..,., ,. o c CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 ITEM NO. APPR~~E~OR AGENn \-., BY: / V The City Council is requested to approve the attached Development Contract for Deerwood Estates. AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Item~ ~~ '-' Approve Development Contract/Deerwood Engineering ~~ ~ BY: Todd J. Haas MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o o 0, . I ~. LAW OFFICES OF Harke and Jlawkins SUITE 101 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD JOHN M. BURKE WILLIAM G. HAWKINS BARRY M. ROBINSON COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA S5433 PHONE (612) 784~2998 June 1, 1988 .-:---.... ...,.:..;;.(.... .._.~.,.c.... ",','., ''''-0- '. _,... '.....' ...." , .:. ....n'..'~,'. " .~~. .~ t:1 "(~i J' ;' . RG;;~~;;nBI- .-..."..,<,..,...~,'.,.,.,...,.,......~....__..-,-_.....".. ,'R Mr. James E. Schrantz Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 CITY OF Al'JDO\lCR Dear Jim: Enclosed please find a proposed Development Contract in regard to the Deerwood Estates subdivision. This is a subdivision that requires the developer to complete all on-site improvements at their cost. Please review the agreement to ensure that it includes all of the items that the developer is supposed to install. You will also have to insert the estimated construc- tion costs of such improvements as well as the completion date. If any changes are needed, please contact me. i,~ce~Jlh 3~. Hawkin' WGH:mk Ene. o o DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 19 , is by and between the City of Andover, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Riverside Development Company of Princeton, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer". WHEREAS, the Developer is in the process of platting certain property to be known as Deerwood Estates; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires final plat approval pr ior to completion of all on-site improvements as required under the Subdivision Ordinance No. 10 of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, said Subdivision Ordinance authorizes the City to enter into a performance contract secured by a bond, cash escrow or letter of credit to guarantee completion of all such improvements following final approval and recording of the final plat; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO that the Developer will provide all labor and materials to construct the improvements described below within the plat of Deerwood Estates according to the plans and specifications attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. -1- o o IT IS ALSO AGREED: ARTICLE ONE That the following improvements shall be completed by the Developer at the Developer's expense according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer. Such improve- ments are as follows: a) Street grading, gravel ing and stabilizing, includ ing construction of berms and boulevards (hereinafter called "Street Improvements") b) Storm sewers, when determined to be necessary by the City Engineer, including all necessary catch basins, inlets and other appurtenances (hereinafter called .Storm Sewer Improvements.) c) Permanent street surfacing, including concrete curb and gutter (hereinafter called .Permanent Street Improve- ments.) d) Standard street name signs at all newly opened intersections (hereinafter called .Traffic Signing Improvements.) In case of any dispute as to what is meant by the plans and specifications, the decision of the City Engineer shall control. ARTICLE TWO The Developer agrees to cause no home construction to be made upon any of the lots to be served within said plat or cause to be filed any application for building permits for such construction until all Developer's bonds or other secur ity required by this Agreement have been filed and accepted by the City Clerk and all legal, administrative and engineering expenses incur red by the Ci ty to date have been paid. That -2- c:> furthermore Developer shall not be granted any certificates of occupancy for homes within said plat prior to the completion of all work required under this Agreement. ARTICLE THREE The City Engineer will inspect the Developer's work by making periodic visits to the site to observe the progress and quality of the executed work and to determine if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract plans and specifi- cations. The Developer shall notify the City Engineer prior to commencement of any construction as to the date when work will commence. If, on the basis of the Engineer's observation and review of the work during construction and his final inspection, he is satisfied that the work has been completed and the Developer fulfilled all of its obligations under the plans and specifications he will approve the improvements and recommend to the City that it accept such improvements. The Developer guar- anteeS and agrees to maintain the stability of all work and materials done, furnished .and installed under this contract for a per iod of one year after the date of acceptance of said improvements by the City. The required Developer's bond or security under Article Four shall be conditioned to include this warranty. o ARTICLE FOUR This Agreement is conditioned upon the Developer obtaining a Developer's bond, letter of credit or other surety -3- c:> acceptable to the City and filing same with the City Clerk. The bond shall be not less than one hundred fifty (150%) per cent of the total estimated construction cost of the improvements as determined by the Engineer. Said estimated cost of the project is and ___/l00 ($ ) Dollars. The Developer may make application with the City Engineer for a reduction in the amount of the required bond, letter of credit or other surety acceptable to the City follow- ing completion of var ious portions of the improvements. In no event shall the remaining secur i ty be less than one hundred fifty (150%) per cent of the Engineer's estimated cost for com- pletion of all items remaining to be installed. The bond, letter of credit or other surety shall name the City as obligee and shall be for the use of the obligee and of all persons doing work or furnishing skill, tools, machinery, materials, insurance premiums or equipment and shall be conditioned for the payment as they become due, of all just claims for such work, tools, machinery, skill, ma ter ials, insurance pr emiums, equipment, taxes and supplies for the completion of the contract in accord- ance with its terms, for saving the obligee harmless fram all costs and charges that may accrue on account of the doing of the work specified and for the enforcing of the terms of the bond if action is brought on the bond including reasonable attorney's fees, in any case where such action is successfully maintained o -4- <:) and for the compliance with the laws appertaining thereto. That Developer shall provide to the City prior to acceptance of said improvements evidence that all claims which could give rise to a mechanic's lien have been paid in full. ARTICLE FIVE The Developer shall pay all reasonable fees and expenses of the City Engineer and City Attorney and City staff for work performed in regard to the installation of the above mentioned improvements. The Developer agrees to deposit with the City such sums as required by the City Administrator to defray such costs. Said amount shall bear no interest and the City shall have the right to pay all fees and expenses of the Engineer and Attorney from the aforementioned escrow deposit. Any monies remaining after payment of said fees shall be returned to the Developer. ARTICLE SIX o Developer will keep the premises free from accumulation of waste materials, rubbish, and other debris .resulting from the work and at the completion of the work, they will remove all waste materials, rubbish and debris from and about the premises as well as all tools, construction equipment and machinery, and surplus materials, and will leave the site clean. Developer will restore to their original conditions those portions of the site not designated for alteration by the contract plans. -5- o ARTICLE SEVEN Developer shall be responsible for all costs of tempo- rary relocation of public facilities while constructing any portion of the improvements. Developer shall notify the City at all times when it shall request temporary relocation of such facilities. ARTICLE EIGHT Developer, its agents or subcontractors shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will protect it from claims under worker's compensation laws, disability benefit laws or other similar employee benefit laws, from claims from damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of its employees, and claims insured by usual personal inj ury liability coverage; from claims or damages because of bodily injury, sickness, or disease, or death of any person other than its employees including claims insured by usual personal injury liability coverage; and from claims for injury to or destruction of tangible property, including loss of use resulting therefrom, any or all of which may arise out of or result from Developer's operations under the contract documents, whether such operations be by itself or by any subcontractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or for whose acts of them may be legally liable. Prior to commencement of the work Developer shall provide certificate of insur ance to the City indicating o -6- ....~op,._^"._. o that the above insurance coverages are in effect dur ing the term of this Agreement. ARTICLE NINE Developer shall indemnify City against any and all loss, claims, or suits, including costs and attorney's fees, for or on account of injury to or death of persons, damage to or destruction of property belonging to either City or other,. Developer hereby agreeing to repair or replace such property if requested so to do by City occurring by reason of the act of neglect of Developer, its employees, or agents, including subcontractors, in connection with the performance of this contract. ARTICLE TEN In addition to the liability imposed by law on Developer on account of damage to property or personal injury, including death, arising through operations under this contract, Developer agrees to indemnify City against any expense, liability or payment for damage to property or personal injury, including death and including injuries to Developer's employees, caused or in any manner arising from operations hereunder. ARTICLE ELEVEN The Developer shall commence construe tion and have completed all improvements required under the terms of this Agreement on or before , 19 In the event any term or condition is breached by the Developer, the City o -7- -~. ,~..~ c:> shall have the right to withhold issuance of building permits on any of the lots within the plat of Deerwood Estates in addition to any other remedies available by law. DEVELOPER RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF PRINCETON By CITY OF ANDOVER Richard C. Foster By Mayor ATTEST: By Clerk o -8- o o STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this , 19___, before me, day of a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Gerald G. Windschitl and Victoria Volk, to me known to be respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Centerville, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of , 19___, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Richard C. Foster, to me known to be the President of Riverside Development Company of Princeton, aeorporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that he executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: Burke and Hawkins 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., tlOl Coon Rapids, MN 55433 -9- o DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Building CITY, OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ITEM 5k. NO. City Hall Sidewalk A roval BY: David Almgren David will have a plan ready at the meeting. COUNCil ACTION SECOND BY MOTION BY TO BY: o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21. 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA SECTION NO. Discus i Engineering ITEM NO. 51. Bond Sale BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested tp hold a bond sale. The bond is for 1988 project in the amount of $5.8 million. See attached information from Bill Hawkins. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o o LAW OFFICES OF Hllrke and Jlawkins JOHN M. BURKE WILLIAM G. HAWKINS BARRY M. ROBINSON June 3, 1988 Mr. James E. Schrantz Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 Dear Jim: o SUITE 101 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD COON RAPIDS. MINNeSOTA 55433 PHONE (612) 7B4~2998 :;:::-.'1....;;. :.;.... :.:-.;.. '.~. . '.I. ~ ~" . H t!l ~'!t '.'''" I ., '''''' to I V., ,~ ' '.UJ '" t" IE!~. >:f 11.." .'...'1 '. !l ~i r.:;~'~';~'~-~";~;~;~ .." u ~"""""~,''''__-'''''' CITY OF ANDOVm Enclosed is our recommendation on the $5,800,000 General Obligation Bond issue. Please put this on the City Council agenda for June 21st. The bond attorney will have a resolution for the City Council's consideration prior to that date. diricerely, J~: V () l'~ William G. Hawkins WGH:mk Enc. L') .1';- prY p/,C. t) ~l'?;;S) o Q "-/' o LAW OFFICES OF Eurke ond }IoU/kinG o JOHN M. BURKE WILLIAM G. HAWKINS BARRY M. ROBINSON June 1, 1988 Mayor and Council Members Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 SUITE 101 _ 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433 PHONE (612)784-2998 Re: Recommendation for Issuance of $5,800,000 of General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds, Series 1988A Gentlemen: We have been advised that the City of Andover is in need of funding for a number of improvement projects that are being undertaken by the City at this time. Based upon the information we have received from John Davidson of Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Associates and Jim Schrantz, our firm makes the following recommendations in regard to the above referenced bond issue. The projects that are in need of funding are as follows: Project De sc ript ion Construction Costs o 87-11 Elementary School, Winslow $ Hills and Oak Bluff (Sani- tary Sewer, Water, Street and Storm Sewer) This amount is over the amount originally estimated and funded in 1987. 87-21 Oak Bluff Second Addition $ (Sanitary Sewer, Water, Street and Storm Sewer) 87-27 Woodland Creek (Sanitary $ Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer and Street) 87-32 Winslow Hills First Addition $ (Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer and Street) 630,386 383,015 618,333 383,641 \,0 '-:-' o Andover City Council June 1, 1988 Pagl? 2 88-1 Crosstown Boulevard Road $ Improvement (from Bunker Lake Blvd. through l40thl includes all estimates for easement acquisition costs for Crosstown Blvd. reloca- tion) 88-2 Bluebird Street and Yellow $ Pine Street Improvements 88-4 Round Lake Boulevard from $ South Coon Creek Drive North (Sewer and Water Extension) 88-5 Hills of Bunker Lake Third $ Addition (Sanitary Sewer, Water, Street and Storm Sewer) 88-6 Kensington Estates Third $ Addition (Sanitary Sewer, Water, Street and Storm Sewer) 88-7 Brandons Lakeview EstateS $ (Sewer and Water) 80-8 Old Colony Estate Phase I, $ (Sewer, Streets and Water) 88-11 Hidden Creek East Phase I $ (Sanitary Sewer, Water, Street and Storm Sewer) 88-12 Oak Bluff (Sewer and Water $ Stubs) Contingencies Engineering Administration Legal Fiscal 6% 17% 3% 1% 1% Total Overhead Costs Total Construction and Overhead Plus: Di scoun t Capitalized Interest TOTAL ..0 .-'-' 758,070 91,000 26,923 369,465 235,050 33,976 321,538 457,243 17,553 $ 259,619 735,588 129,809 43,269 43,269 $4,326,993 $1,211,554 $5,538,547 + 105,000 + 156,453 $5,800,000 We would also offer the following comments in regard to the above projects: o 1. Improvement Project 87-11 will rely on connection charges and area assessments from prior trunk projects as well as additional areas to be served in the future. Since the o o "- o Andover City Council June 1, 1988 Page 3 infrastructure of the sewer and water systems are now in place the City Engineer is in the process of preparing a revised capital improvements financing plan which will show the total costs of all of the trunk, source and storage improvements as well as the amount of income received through connection charges and area assessments to defray the costs of these improvements. 2. In regard to the 88-1 Crosstown Boulevard Project, this is the final segment of the Crosstown Boulevard relocation project. The Engineer has advised us that the estimated costs for the entire relocation including those portions previously completed is $1,660,690. Of this total, the Anoka County share would be $1,191,870. The City's portion of the construction costs and overhead would be $468,820. In addition to this amount we have incurred an estimated $93,000 of payments to landowners for acquisi- tion costs as well as an estimated $22,000 for legal, appraisal and condemnation commissioner expenses. Total acquisi tion costs are estimated at $115,000. Therefo re the City's share of this project would be $583,820. We have included in the 88-1 funding the $115,000 additional costs for easement acquisition. It is our understanding that the City has an ag reement wi th the Coun ty of Anoka that they will reimburse the County's share which has been funded by the Ci ty plus accrued interest thereon. The Ci ty' s share of the Crosstown Boulevard project will be funded through special assessments and Minnesota State Aid funds. 3. Project 88-4 and 88-7 will be less than 100% assessed. The remainder of the costs of these projects will also be funded through the connection charges and area assessments imposed across all the property in the sanitary sewer and water improvement water districts of the City. The information we have been provided indicates that all of the other project costs listed above will be 100% assessed against the properties they serve. Under the City of Andover Public Improvements Financing Policy adopted by the City Council, public improvements for new sub- divisions and undeveloped areas provide that the developer shall deposit with the City a cash escrow or letter of credit of not less than fifteen (15%) per cent of the estimated project cost as determined by the eningeer. The total project costs shall be assessed in equal annual installments over a period of not to exceed ten (10) years. The cash escrow shall remain intact until the outstanding principal and assessments against the O property is equal to or less than the cash escrow deposit. At such time the cash escrow deposit may be used to pay the balance of the principal outstanding. The policy further provides that ,0 \ ' -...:/ o '--.-" o Andover City Council June 1, 1988 Page 4 the assessments shall be paid in full when a certificate of occupancy is issued. Nearly all of the proposed local improve- ments are being' constructed to serve new subdivisions, there- fore, the entire cost of the projects as set out above would be assessed over a ten (10) year period. Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates has assured us that their calculations indicate that the assessment income from the projects is suffi- cient to meet the debt service obligations for a temporary and permanent bond issue. The City has experienced the operation of this policy with improvements installed over a number of years in the past. Since a substantial portion of the area to be served by the proposed improvements is to be developed immediately, it is entirely likely that a substantial portion of the assessments which are a part of this project will be prepaid. As we have recommended for the last two improvement bond issues, we again feel the Ci ty should issue $5,800,000 of three year general obligation temporary improvement bonds to finance the construc- tion of this project. The reason for such recommendation is that the average interest rate on the temporary bond issue would be substantially less than on the permanent bond issue. We believe that at the end of the three year period the City will have a definitive idea of the prepayments and will be in a better position to determine its permanent capi tal needs to finance these improvements. At that time the City would have the following three options: 1. To pay the entire bond issue from the collected assess- ments and any additional excess funds the City may have on hand. 2. If development continues to grow at a rapid pace and the City anticipates that the balance of the areas to be served by the improvements will be developed shortly thereafter, it may sell a second three year temporary bond issue. 3. The City may issue permanent long term financing to cOVer the costs of funding the temporary obligations. These decisions can be made at the time of the maturity of the temporary improvement bonds. We feel that provisions should be included in the temporary bonds that allows the City to call the bonds at the end of the first two years thereof. We believe that this will provide additional flexibility in timing the refunding of the temporary obligations to correspond with changes in market conditions as they relate to interest rates. o The major disadvantage to temporary bonds is that the City may be required to refinance the bonds prior to their maturity in the bond market whose condition cannot be ascertained at the 'iP.. \:"'.""" ~ " . ,0 Andover Ci ty Coun,cil June 1, 1988 o Page 5 time. ~ie believe, however, that the call future set out does provide sufficient flexibility and that the overall reduction in the costs associated wi th a temporary bond issue does war rant their issuance at this time. The second problem that will arise is the determination as to the interest rate to charge on the assessment pr ior to the issuance of definitive bonds. Normally the City assesses at approximately one (1%) per cent above the rate on the bonds. However, if the City elects to issue permanent financing the bond issue will not have been sold at the time of levying the assessment. Therefore the City wi 11 have to make the judgment as to what interest rate to charge on the unpaid assessments. We believe that the City should charge interest on the unpaid assessments at a rate sufficient to cover any upswing in the market conditions from the long term rates that would be in effect presently. 'l'he long term rate on bonds of this natur e would be in the vicinity of eight (8%) per cent. Therefore we believe the City Council should consider utilizing this as a base point for setting its assessment rate. Since the City will be issuing bonds in 1988 in excess of $5,000,000 we will be subject to the rebate requirements estab- lished by the 1986 Tax Reform Act. The City will be required to calculate all earnings on its debt service investments from the sale of this bond issue and if arbitrage profits have been made, rebate those to the federal goverrunent. The calculations of these amounts can be time consuming and expensive. We recommend that the City meet with its auditing firm immediately to discuss their expertise and possible involvement in these calculations for the City. The City 'is cur rently rated "8aa-l" by ~100dy' s and we do not anticipate an improvement in that rating. We recommend that the City obtain another rating from Moody's Investors Service since such will be necessary for marketing of the temporary improve- ment bonds. o The bonds would be dated August 1, 1988 and the first interest payment would be due on February 1, 1989. Provision has been made for capitalized interest to make the February 1, 1989 bond interest payment since we do not expect a sufficient number of prepayments to be made prior to that date to fund this interest payment. We are anticipating that the City will assess this project and levy same on or before October 10, 1988. We are providing that the entire temporary improvement bond issue mature and be refinanced on or before August 1, 1991, unless called earlier as set out above. We are recommending that the City authorize the seeking of bids at their meeting on June 21, 1988 and that bids be taken on the issue on Tuesday, July 5, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. at the Andover City Hall. If the award of the o o o o Andover City Council June 1, 1988 Page 6 bid is made on July 5, 1988, funds will be available approxi- mately thirty (30) days thereafter. If any members of the council have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. temlY, ~ 0, ,~OhhA ~ k' WI~:~aw Ins WGH:mk Ene. o c CITy OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGEl (6 BY:/ Discussion Items Engineering ITEM NO. 6 (Y"\, BY: James E. Schrantz Tonson This item was continued from the June 7th meeting so the current information from the State, County, Deputy reports, permitted hours of operation, etc. can be obtained. It was suggested the site be inspected weekly. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21. 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVctO OR AGEN A ( BY Sf) Planning ITEM NO. Bergeron Special Use Permit BY: Dar I D. More The City Council is requested to review the special use permit request of Jeffrey and Linda Bergeron, 16422 Hanson Boulevard N.W., to operate a boarding and training kennel on their property, which is zoned R-1, single-family rural. Section 7.03 of Ordinance 8 allows dog kennels in R-1 districts only, by special use. The definition of a dog kennel, from Section 3.02 of Ordinance 8, is "any place where four or mor~ dogs over six months of age are boarded, bred and/or offered for sale, except a veterinary clinic." Originally, Mr. Bergeron had proposed the placement of an 80 dog capacity dog kertnel ~n property to be purchased from Dorothy Aasness. However, the Planning Commission requested the petitioner scale-down the proposal. The petitioner submitted a new, scaled-down proposal with a new location for the dog kennel (see attached proposal and site map). The dog kennel, now proposed to have a capacity of 26 dogs, is to be located behind the petitioner's house, in the southwest corner of the lot that Mr. Bergeron currently owns. A Planning Commission motion to approve the special use permit request failed on a 3-3 vote at their June 14, 1988 meeting. The problem in this case is the fact that Ordinance 8 does not place a limit on the number of dogs permitted by special use. The Planning Commission wrestled with this question during the course of their discussion of this request. Concerns were raised when this request first appeared before the Planning Commission on May 10, 1988; concerns about the large size of the proposal, noise, increased traffic, decreased property values, and the conducting of a commercial business in a residential district. while the scaled-down proposal is an improvement over the original request, it still does not alleviate all of the above- COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o mentioned concerns. A decision on whether or not to grant this special use permit request must be made based upon the effect the proposed use will have on: 1) the health, safety and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding property: 2) values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area: and 3) existing and anticipated traffic conditions. In addition, the proposal should be in harmony with the intent and purpose of the residential district in which it lies. Mr. Bergeron does have the option of conducting his dog kennel business on commercially- zoned property. o c'..,,~: :.; ,'. '~;~q~-: ~"f~':_~~~~-" ~; . (If metes and bounds, attach the Description of Request ~ f?~~fl?/~ #vcr Y~/rJ//, ~6VdcL" complete legal): SEE ,(l~~ /C) ;:;/'&;;/Z..4TT~ /J ~/,J9- uJ /rlf ,tJ cf-6' /) (')/.; C#r'fe..>T'/ Section of Ordinance 1.03 Current Zoning R- ( ***********************************~********************************** Name of Applicant = iKrr~~y y LYA1~ 6~-,e66-earJ Address /DOlcJ.L r!:)''YT1'J",) Wcy)tD SF ~...J /,4P/,D~ m..-J ..53""V.5J Home Phone ?d'-~"'/~6 Business Phone S~-c::r?.y7 Signature~*JI ~~" Date /.,) -,71-~? , ' ' ********************~,~************************** Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Home Phone" Business Phone Signature Date *******************************************************************,** Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent street names; ~ocation and use of existing structures within 350 feet. ;i".<The names andaddresse,s of all property owners within 3 feet of the OS;.~~~~0,o'~ro~~i~;;:B?!1!1~~r,f,~j~bep~Ovi ded ...> " ~~~~i't;~~~~oni~:~'<~;~5;~'.~~;Date paid;ic.{h~~ Receipt, .~ll~ l' 'Fdr~g,,~~e:,;);N't'~~~,fl0.00 'C~~~~;"f~..id,>'Y~~", Receipt'. Q.11J-1 "",'{:;':' ," >2':::".;' ';'~~\:-~;. '/,::~':~. ,-' .;-; " '''~'.. ,J .,'.,,,;, _ ~,",i'r-" "",.~'. -. ,'. ',~;- ,-.'.-.--.---..-' ..... ." - . - .. -.' ., ~". ._,~,,-:,-:,1";. ,;.;:.~.'_'__-...;;~_.~;_:;,~~:.___>: --,-..: -_, o o CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N'w. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Andover Planning and zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, Tuesday, May 10, 1988 at the Andover City Hall to consider the Special Use Permit request of Jeffrey and Lynda Bergeron to allow a dog kennel on the property described as the North one-half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka ~ounty, Minnesota, (16422 Hanson Boulevard NW). All persons interested in being heard will be given the opportunity at the above time and location. L~J d/i; Victoria volk - City Clerk " o o .0 '..0....- BERGERON SUP (#88-04) Donald Osman 1781 - 167th Andover, MN Avenue N.W. 55304 Edward Bayers 1657 - 161st Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Dorothy Aasness 16425 Hanso(\ 1)\~tt p0,\}J, f\V'<,~cJtV; r\~N 553(',\ Q .....~- '~ o o ~ PROPOSED KENNEL Building will be 24 x 40 with a 20 x 12 kitchen off the front and a 20 x 12 storage area off the back. There will be a total of 26 runs inside and out with trap doors on each run. To handle the noise factor there will be a six foot pri~acy fence around the kennel area. Not to mention the tree lines on the south and west sides. The kennel will be air- conditioned 50 that it will allow the dogs to be kept in at night. So that there will not be barking noises at night. The sewer will be sized to meet current building code. , , , '_0: o '\) ~ ~ ~ '-- ~ G\ ~ 'i -- IREtE lINe:- IKE#NEI-I N > I Jlov~ [ 330 EJ:.f/E ... vb D k I V E. V Al "I I- i j - i >/_--- o I f' " ~, ", \ , ,,'..- , , \ \ , (.f) '-. -.-'; SITE L- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ ,,_ . I ~ ----- @ ~ fi-l , , (3) SJ", or ",v~-:~.:tIlI r #~- y., '" ", TiiiS /S A COMPILATION OF RECORDS AS . THEY APPEAR IN THE ANOKA COUNTY ."" . OFFICES AFFECTING THE AREA SHOWN. THIS ORA WING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES AND THE COUN- TY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY IN- ACCURACIES HEREIN CONT A/NED.' 659/5 " .: ,... ,- HE CORNER SEC. '5 '/2:r.4/ I.~~ :>".. "'LIJ4 Si?9-/8.f8.5'; : #".4'."/":' /5'/ , \ , I .r . ~ (\I ~ '" , , --.------ .. ~ (:Sh -.- i .~ h'~ I ...... ~ ~ .- )... , ~ ~ , li . ~ ~ I ' "I ~ .. . I iii ~ I : I -<:)- ----1 :-t . I ...... j ~ I ~ ,I ~ I " <i. " ~ , ....... ' , '" o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21. 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT FOR AGENDA SECTION NO. Di < 'S \-\ BY: Todd J. Haas Engineering ITEM NO. Gammon Bros. Special Use Permit/Minin The City Council is requested to review and approve the Special Use Permit to mine dirt. The City Staff has reviewed the application and their comments are as follows: A. The applicant is proposing to mine one area. See attached drawing. B. The applicant shall maintain a finished grade of 6-1/2 feet above the permanent or seasonal high water table. C. The applicant is requested to make reasonable use of the property without altering the topography greatly. D. Safety precautions are to be taken at the end of each working day to prevent injury to playing children, bike riders, snowmobilers, etc. E. The applicant is required to restore the mined area using an approved topsoil and seed. F. The applicant shall provide the City of Andover with a security bond to hold the City harmless against road damage and for restoration of the site. G. Signs be placed on both sides of any county or City street acting as a haul road indicating trucks hauling. H. Watering of the haul road to control dust. I. Hauling of material is Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. and saturdays, 7:00 A.M. to 12:00 noon. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY GAMMON BROTHERS, INC. TO MINE SOIL FROM 125 BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD (PIN 36-32- 24-13-0001 AND PIN 36-32-24-12-0001). WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice, the Planning and zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and reviewed the request of Gammon Brothers, Inc. to mine soil from the property at 125 Bunker Lake Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Special Use Permit has been reviewed by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing and review, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of a Special Use Permit requested by Gammon Brothers, Inc. to mine dirt at the property located at 125 Bunker Lake Boulevard. WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 'IT RESOLVED by the Ci ty Council of the Ci ty of Andover to hereby approve the Special Use Permit for Gammon Brothers, Inc. contingent upon the following: 1. The permit is for one year only. 2. The applicant shall maintain a finished grade of no less than 6-1;2 feet above the permanent or seasonal high water table, whichever is higher. 3. Safety precautions are to be taken at the end of each working day to prevent injury to children or others by the use of fencing or 4:1 sloping to surround the excavation area. 4. The applicant shall be required to restore the mined area using a city-approved topsoil and seed at the end of the mining period. 5. " 6. 7. 0 8. 9. The applicant shall hold the City of Andover harmless and shall provide a security bond to the City harmless for road damage and for restoration of the site in an amount to be determined by legal counsel. When in operation, signs are to be placed on both sides of any county road or city street acting as a haul road. watering shall take place to control dust whenever it is required. Hauling of materials shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 7:00p.M. and Saturdays, 7:00 A.M. to 12:00 noon. The total amount of materials to be excavated shall not exceed 100,000 cubic yards. o o Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this of , 1988. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER day Jerry Windschit1 - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o(~) \ ",., I>.. ,6,(", "~!\'<!<""'P.!f':....~.,.,\.,.~, ""~'.r,.,.",..:"(r CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PARTIAL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 14, 1988 GAMMON BROTHERS MINING PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING. CONTINUED MOTION was made by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Bose11, that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the mining permit of the Gammon Brothers at the location of 125 Bunker Lake Boulevard (PIN 36-32-24-13-0001 and PIN #36-32-24-12-0001) for the removal or excavation of rock, sand, dirt, clay and other like materials. The Commission finds that the use is not contrary to the particular parcel or the character of the area surrounding it, but should be subject to the following conditions: The permit is for one year only. The applicant shall maintain a finished grade of no less than 6-1/2 feet above the permanent or seasonal high water table, whichever is higher. Safety precautions are to be taken at the end of each working day to prevent injury to children or others by the use of fencing or 4:1 sloping to surround the excavation area. The applicant shall be required to restore the mined area using a city-approved topsoil and seed at the end of the mining period. The applicant shall hold the City of Andover harmless and shall provide a security bond to the City harmless for road damage and for restoration of the site in an amount to be determined by legal counsel. When in operation, signs are to be placed on both sides of any county road or City street acting as a haul road. Watering shall take place to control dust whenever it is required. o Hauling of materials shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays, 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. o Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes June 14, 1988 Page Two The total amount of materials to be excavated shall not exceed 100,000 cubic yards. Attached to the permit shall be the large- scale map showing at least one section corner and a county road and the PIN numbers of the property. The applicant is required to show on the large scale map the water table. Roll call: Commissioner Pease, Commissioner Vistad, Commissioner Bernard, Commissioner Jacobson, Commissioner Bose11 and Commissioner Perry all voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. This item will be heard by the City Council on June 21st. TIMBER TRAILS PRELIMINARY PLAT PUBLIC HEARING MOTION made by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Vistad, that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval the Timber Trails preliminary plat, with the legal description as Section 5, Township 32, Range 24 and S.W. quarter of Section 5, Township 32, Range 24. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing on this plat and there has been input from the public basically concerning the drainage pond in the southwest corner of the plat and some discussions on the surface and the road at 178th Lane. The Commission recommends approval of this plat with the following variances granted: Variances for lot width: Block 1, Lot 3 Block 2, Lot 1, Lot 4 (with Lot 4 to front at 178th Lane) o Block 4, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Block 3, Lots 6 (front footage) Block 3, Lot 7 (front footage) Block 3, Lot 13 (front footage) Lot 3, Block 5 for front footage on 174th Avenue rather than Tulip Street. o - ; . " I, ;. II h - -" i o C.l'~ of AftJPoVEA $Et!.TltJ'" 3&' "'8TH AV(. NW MTTH AVE.. NW "'8TH AVE, HW M&TH AVL -n f44TH Ayt N'W M!1tO "VI. NW MIND Avt. NW I4I$T aV(. NW MOTH AVE NW ISlll4 AYt. -NW t38T'H AYE. ..... '51TH AY[. NW IMTH AVt. NW !SSTM AV(. HW' IS4TH 1lYt. .... 1SS~"Vl. fiN' I C:>RegUla~ City Council Meeting May 17, 1988 - Minutes Page 10 ANOKA COUNTY SPECIAL USE PERMIT Chal~pe~son Pe~~y ~evlewed the Commission's ~ecommendation to deny the County's ~equest to allow the const~uctlon of a SOO-foot ~adlo communications towe~ fo~ dispatching police, fi~e, highway and park services throughout Anoka County. They were not opposed to the tower o~ Its pu~pose but we~e conce~ned that It would be ve~y close to the Inte~sectlon of Hanson and Bunke~ Lake Bouleva~ds. At the time of the hea~ing, the Met~opolltan Council would not conslde~ a towe~ on the on-site buffe~ a~ea of the p~oposed landfill. Since then, Mr. Mo~ey has contacted the Met Council and was told they would not be opposed to the on-site buffer area, which is what the P & Z had hoped to accomplish. B~uce Wolack. Anoka County Cent~al Communications - reviewed d~awings of the p~oposed location whe~e the towe~ would sit even with the fence. The Metropolitan Council has said the towe~ could be placed on the buffer a~ea as long as the guy wi~es do not touch the actual site. That will be the main towe~ for all fire, police and medical emergencies in Anoka County. They had also hoped to build a radio repair shop in that area. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, a Resolution approving a Special Use Permit by Anoka County for a SOO-foot radio communications tower on the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 35, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, with the third WHEREAS being inserted: WHEREAS, the tower will be located as far east from Hanson Boulevard toward the County Highway Building as possible, totalling 500 to 600 feet east of Hanson, and as far south of Bunker Lake Boulevard as practical. (See Resolution R083-88) Motion carried unanimously. GENE BROWN LOT SPLIT MOTION by O~ttel, Seconded by Knight, a Resolution approving the lot split as requested by Gene Brown for property located at PIN No. 32 32 24 42 0012 to the requirements of City Ordinance No. 40 as presented. (See Resolution R084-88) Motion carried unanimously. SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT WORK PLAN/JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the Anoka County Solid Waste Work Plan, Joint Powers Agreemnt as presented, and autho~lze the Mayo~ and City Cle~k to sign It. Motion carried unanimously. o GAMMON BROTHERS MINING PERMIT MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we ~efer the item of the Gammon Brothers mining permit back to the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. J- t:~DY ',I>!;' , ::)~"" So" '.' ~':';_)_I:':'!;!i+-" prbper+y Adc:)r,ess Hit:;,' Home,Phone :,' "" '- -, ::~>.-t :'~f. - .: 1':1?>'ir:J1. ":1): ;:: ~!J.~iiF'ffj: .!~~ ;,i'" '!\::>;:J~:f.~~~::/;~,:~ '42&- zeoo7!~';!:-1;'A; :)~ '-'::';;f!l:~:,';~,;;.~"~~;' ,.-.i(Ult7" -~)r.~i;f#tl9'e1 'Date';t"'b ~'r":kDc) f;;;::h*: : ;:':It::.)r'''','~I~'';;hi;:,~~';''- '(,':.: : j{~,i:. , "~:' , : ,.;t~ . ' ;r ~ '; Signature >{;;;.) '. , o *************************************************** P i;~B~~r ty: ow~~;~' (;~~;J:~~~~ ~; Bo.~ ba.\ i (~~,Ai f fer~l1~:ff rOIl\:::~q9y~J, ,ii";::r:-::;':i1:" ,:" ~.- _ ;':':i'\\~j';":'}~" !,.:_:",j.~\r.,t,<l~:~~r/:r_;": ,::.,: A<lcI.~~s s, 'l-Z >;';':(;,c;li3~n kef ;:::f*.<-' i~~:::'~,~:. ::~~. : >;t~~~!~, _"~? ::\:f.l}:'Jr;~-"I; ~~k~'.- HO!lle; Pnone, ,,,.,;,,p S$'J. ,J37F1-,i';. ~:\hF~;' or} ;~;: :" ',~-:.: ~~~ ~~::,: ~;Y~j~~:~~W Signature " ' '~::'~~,$"::':':':;' ;,'~' ,(/ ****~******!!~***'~~~~'** :f11:");;' >',:::'!t~.;ft,>' -, -~:--<k~~:-!~1~[~1-T~~1::>~!~-:t::.: .. ~ ':,,',:'.- - , i .-"" Attach Cisca1ed' diawing ~roperty ," }~nd ',. affe,q,te, ,", showing: scale and}f!,north arrow~ dlmensions '~;ofthe. \ property :'.and 1;', structures ~lf ront ~:rl' side and rear yard building l;se tbacks ~,t$'adj acen,~ ':, street names; ','location;! a.nd use of existing struqtures, wi thin).350 feet.:,; .:.<(" ;::',;,' ',::\/{:i :",~::,:,\,\t~.ilfl;qki~r<'~ ~<- I' '~II~t'~r < } ."r~h;1r~!W~~i 1 '~;i~:~'W~f~~f;:;(: 'i", The' names and address,es of all property ~.t'of:" ":'" subject .property mu 'also be provided.:' l ""t.'::', ":",:, ' - ":~.:,,,!,;;, ; ~".:'< ", " ' , '..'l\'~-; ;\ .. \),; ,', (~l" Application " - ~': :'j'~g}~~ Filing Date ,-/; J..t; f!-oV ::rohVl5oA/ ~rope(~ c@\) ,y , ' c". .,., " .'....,., ,,-.'- ," CITY of ANDOVER APPLICATION FOR LAND RECLAMATION, MINING, OR SOIL PROCESSING Permit Fee Receipt It Date Paid $ /So.oo '2"'" '1fo 2-2(:,-88 Permit No. The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for th~ excavation, removal or grading of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay and other like material within the City of Andover, agreeing to do all work in strict compliance with City Ordinances and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Applicant (;//~j/I10111 i5a5, lie.-- Telephone W~,;2r- .;:2f'()~ Address 1?c;,:J?oy gg ~~.?~ /f/, -5:5'$7f' Owner of Land l~(<'()y '6-- &~.h10 ~j.-+',;iiOtVfe1ephone 75'S"- '179'1' /~s-1iJ~4 n, ~~ - Address The correct legal description of the premises where: ;Jb- 3~-l.'l -/7. .0001 PIN It:Jb-'3'Z.-2'l-/1-GcClthe removal or excavation of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay or other like materials shall or does occur, or PIN It SI\MIO I\!> A S()~'E the storage or disposition of rock, sand, dirt) gravel, clay or other like materials shall or does occur, or PIN It S/\III ~ AS Aeove grading of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay or other like materials shall or does occur. o Estimated time schedule of intermediate operations of the'. removal, storage or excavation I yec~( frOfYl upprovI1-1 of d(~ dOlLr?,;j Estimated date of completion of the above operation Ap~il ~, lqe~ Statement of purpose for removal, storage or excavation F,111'11e,-teniLl , I/o. Icu.!, CoO 'fn.u.:hcl1 n:l - €.Gots /'(\ ,,\\'\d LHA.+!>id e J,. (J,;k; -(Z AI,dl.Jv'€.r. Complete list of highways, streets or other public ways within the City upon and along which the materials excavated or removed ~l;1all b.e transpg}'ted L/ L -L.J. . :31/1"4:0- f.-(7VAJl-y I< Q4P5tPO%//Z-Y ell)" 5'(~C:t::I5' ~.. bA1l1h1Cr1 Bros, will ' b<2... ('e~~ +<>_.(:.o(\Jo.c,.'L. 'tl..e. Ct"~ of' ~dovev pno(" io ~$I~ Andover- Clt-(J 5-tree-l5. ; . -~ o Persons ~...il e.- -rzo-Gb'18 f the !3itt;e - eN':::' WI5.A1 /c. t-<J k I <1?Adr%tJL'~/ r-rbl::/~, ffc;AlI-CA/.:I kAlI"/~, do;t-r>/5 the following five (5) items (may be on same Type of Equipment Map or plat showing map) : 1. 2. 3. The existing land elevations and water table elevations based on sea level readings. The proposed pit or excavation to be made showing the confines or limits thereof together with the proposed finished elevations (side slopes not to exceed 4:1) based on sea level readings. Present zoning and land use (parcel and within 350' of affected property). ({-I ~i",C)Ie. fo.W'i'd ~U(Z..Aj... Proposed zoning and land use (if change is desired). - Wo pr<>foseJ d'\o.o8es ~.JJ,..:.o ~ Scale to the nearest .10 feet" north arrow, and existing street names. 4. 5. Surety or Security Bond, in such form and sum as set by Council Resolution, running to the city, conditioned to pay the City the cost and expense of: a. Repairing any highways, streets, or other public ways within the City made necessary by the special burden resulting from hauling and transporting thereon by the applicant, the amount of such cost to be determined by the City Council; and conditioned further to sayethe City free and harmless from any and all suits or claims for damages resulting from the negligent excavation, removal or storage of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay or other like material within the City. b. Renovating the site to an approved land use in the event of revocation of said permit by either party. Applicant is required to furnish certificates of insurance to the City in the amounts of at least $100,000.00 bodily injury liability per person; $300,000.00 per person for injuries or death arising from anyone occurrence; and $50,000.00 property damage liability for anyone occurrence. Such insurance shall include a ten (10) day notice of cancellation or non-renewal of insurance and such notice shall be provided to the City upon its issuance. .s,de. 51cfe S 1"t> he l-J :1 '" ;'I""ir1 rreil~ing nuisances or ~od'-""(5 c-/ .u-d" '0. Describe precautions to be t",I,~,," hazards to public health and:.ll. o <2 -j-'M -end o o - ~ ~:' Applicant shall post at said site a copy and a copy of the Resol~~ o CIty OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Items Engineering ITEM NO. Lund MSA 5' BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to determine the alignment for 168th Avenue in Lund's Evergreen Estates or across Verdin street alignment. We are working with the DNR and state aid. DNR (John Stine) will come out Tuesday to look at the protected wetland. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Items Engineering -(1~ FOR ITEM NQ Timber Trails Prelim. Plat BY: Todd J. Haas The city Council is requested to review and approve Timber Trails preliminary plat, grading and drainage plan per Ordinances 8 and 10. The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the preliminary plat, grading and drainage plan. Their comments are as follows: General Comments: *The proposed preliminary plat is currently zoned R-2, single family estates. The property is required to develop minimum 108,900 square foot ~ots. See Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 a(3). *The proposed preliminary plat consists of 36 single family rural residential lots. Other Comments: *The developer is required to meet the Standard Specifications for Rural Residential Street Construction. *A mining permit is required if any material is to be removed from the site. *A11 disturbed areas shall be topsoi1ed and seeded as required. *The ARC is concerned about the type of construction being used for the drainage areas. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY The following comments are per the preliminary plat checklist (Ordinance 10): o 8.01 IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION a. Proposed name is Timber Trails. c. The Subdivider is Lary Carlson. d. Scale is 1" = 200'. f. Date of preparation is May 2, 1988. Date of revision is June 6, 1988. g. The preliminary plat was prepared by Lot Survey's Inc. The grading plan was prepared by Ken Gust. 8.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS b. Total acreage is 114.1. d. All existing streets and utilities shall be shown on plat. There is existing telephone cable on the property. All cables shall be placed according to the typical street section. See street plan and profiles. j. Soil boring reports have been received. One report is from Ronald M. Horless dated 5/6/72. Mr. Horless does indicate the soil characteristics are generally good for building and road construction. The second report 'is from the Coswe11 Engineering Co. Coswell Engineering addresses individual disposal systems and indicates the site is excellent for the support of individual disposal systems. 'The preliminary plats indicate 4 soil borings. See grading plan for boring locations. Lowest floor elevations shall be adjusted 3 feet abbve the natural ground water level. 8.04 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION a. Proposed density is 0.32 lots per acre. f. Floodplain management is Lower Rum River. g. Street lighting as required. j. Total road length is 1.25. 9.03 STREETS m. All driveway accesses shall be 60 feet or more from any intersection. n. 4 inches of topsoil and seeding is required on boulevard areas and all disturbed areas. o o o 9.06 9.07 LOTS a.3. Lots 1 - 8 of Block 4 do not meet the minimum lot area 108,900 square feet. Variances will be needed. b. Lots 1 and 3 of Block 1, Lots 1 and 4 of Block 2, Lots 6, 7, 1n, 11, 13, 14 of Block 3, Lots 2 - 7 of Block 4, Lot 3 of Block 5, and Lot 1 of Block 6 do not meet the required footage of 300 ft. at the building setback line. e. The plat shall be reviewed by the DNR because a portion of the plat is located within the Scenic River District. PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, OPEN SPACE Park dedication as required. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TIMBER TRAILS AS BEING DEVELOPED BY LAWRENCE B. CARLSON, PRESIDENT OF WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY IN SECTION 5-32-24. WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and reviewed the preliminary plat of Timber Trails; and WHEREAS, the plat has been reviewed by the Andover Review Committee; and WHEREAS, there was no large amount of negative comments; and WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing and review, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the plat citing the following: 1) A va~iance from Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 (a.3.). Lots 1-8 of Block 4 do not meet the minimum square footage. 2) A variance from Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 (b) for lot width. The lots include: - Lot 3 of Block 1 - Lots 1 & 4 of Block 2 - Lots 6, 7, 10, 11, 13 of Block 3 - Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, of Block 4 - Lot 3 of Block 5 3) park dedication as determined by the Park Commission. WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the preliminary plat of Timber Trails. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this , 19 day of CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Vo1k - City Clerk o o o Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes June 14, 1988 Page Two The total amount of materials to be excavated shall not exceed 100,000 cubic yards. Attached to the permit shall be the large- scale map showing at least one section corner and a county road and the PIN numbers of the property. The applicant is required to show on the large scale map the water table. Roll call: Commissioner Pease, Commissioner Vistad, Commissioner Bernard, Commissioner Jacobson, Commissioner Bose11 and Commissioner Perry all voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. This item will be heard by the City Council on June 21st. TIMBER TRAILS PRELIMINARY PLAT PUBLIC HEARING MOTION made by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Vistad, that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval the Ti~ber Trails preliminary plat, with the legal description as Section 5, Township 32, Range 24 and S.W. quarter of Section 5, Township 32, Range 24. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing on this plat and there has been input from the public basically concerning the drainage pond in the southwest corner of the plat and some discussions on the surface and the road at 178th Lane. The Commission recommends approval of this plat with the following variances granted: Variances for lot width: Block 1, Lot 3 Block 2, Lot 1, Lot 4 (with Lot 4 to front at 178th Lane) Block 4, Lots ];), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, @ lB10Ck 3, Lots 6 (front footage)@ Block 3, Lot 7 (front footage) /0, II Block 3, Lot 13 (front footage) Lot 3, Block 5 for front footage on 174th Avenue rather than Tulip Street. o o Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes June 14, 1988 Page Three Subject to park dedication fees and park dedication as determined by the Park Board. These lots are platted at 2-1/2 acre minimum lot sfze pursuant to Ordinance 10C, Section 9.06 a(a)~ Roll call: Commissioners Pease, Bose11, Jacobson, Vistad, Perry, Bernard all voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. This item will go to the city Council on June 21st. Respectfully, (Plan.5) . 10.l2!J 1 COUNTY OF ANOKA Depanment of Highways Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520 ;.'--;- E'"' [-:.:--iW'::--:;-;:"""';;' -- . .....N' .' "..1 -...'f- /! ;' .,.. --'- D.~.' -, I :. -" \,c ::.~. :'1 4:1 . , ~ rj:;;.l-~-;;~:l II "'.. '.1 . -- . ... CITY OF ANDOVER June 14, 1988 city of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN. 55304 Attention: Jim Schrantz Regarding: Preliminary Plat of Timber Trails Dear Jim: We have reviewed the preliminary Plat of Timber Trails located on CR #58 in the City of Andover. Right of way feet shown. easements be along the county Road is acceptable at the 60 We recommend that 15 foot drainage and utility provided within the plat along all roads. The plat has an excellent layout with regard to providing access for the individual lots. with the layout provided, no lots should need access directly to the county highway and therefore the right of access from Lot 4 Block 2, Lot 14 Block 3 and Lots 3 and 4 Block 5 to the county highway should be dedicated to Anoka county. This will insure that driveway access is only to the city street. One comment regarding County Road #58 in general, and not specifically aimed at this plat, but a disturbing trend is developing along CR #58 as a whole. That trend is no city streets aligning on each side of the highway. While they are spaced out sufficient that the intersections do not cause real problems for our operation, in the future the residents of this area may have difficulty getting onto the highway. Since no city streets align, it is unlikely that traffic control on CR #58 will be warranted. This is a similar type situation that has occurred on CR #9 in Andover and also on University Avenue in the cities of Blaine and Coon Rapids. Be aware that this type of pattern does cause significant problems for the residents when traffic volumes become high on the main highway. o " Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer o o -2- Thank you for the opportunity to comment and if you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 7~'X~ william A. Sironen, PE Assistant County Engineer - Administration xc: County Surveyor ... t '" to. _ _' ~ t: ~ oi ~DOVER o PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 1C.~ ! 0 Street Location of Property: J . I C!- (2.., cf; 0 Legal Description of Property: ~Sl T~ '3). ~f- ~ <S.W 1)1rvJ.u-'lb ~~ Tt"rf~~'t~:l ~''f Property Owner: ~ ~lc.,J tX... &. Address: ~S()(J <[~6 t,r.). M~ ~ '\. D.t..ArPA..<A.- WO{)O LPt1VO Vt.ll~ f M-uJ r tv. Phone: !3D W _ Mu':,__ <. t. ~ Phone: '1-2.. 7- 7~ Applicant t.f- 2- 7 - 7 ~CJ"b Address: Description of Request: x-, o op-u.r 3~ ?. Yz_ A-.:...~ Lo"j"S. Rezoning Request Reqt:.ired: Yes_ No VEXplain Fee: Receipt No: (Si ture of Applicant) bp~~~~~ Date Paid: " - 1- <{f (Date) o i \ applicant one week prior to the hearing. o Preliminary Plat is placed on City Council agenda. Inform applicant of the City Council action. If request is granted, provide applicant with a copy of the resolution stating the conditions upon ,which approval is granted. If denied, provide applicant an explanation of the basis for denial. I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and material submitted with this application is complete and accurate per City ordinance and policy requirements. I understand that only complete applications will be scheduled for an appropriate Planning Commission meeting. I understand that the application will be processed in sequence with respect to other submittals. ~J~l~ I ~-r-6S Date Application Approved By Date , o . " o CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Andover Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, Tuesday, June 14, 1988 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, MN to consider the'preliminary plat of Timber Trail consisting of 36 single family residentfal lots as being developed by Woodland Development on the property described as part of Section 5, Township 32, Range 24. All opponents and pr'oponents of said proposed preliminary plat will be heard at the above time and location. &-~ k~ Victoria Volk - City Clerk o , I" " " o o .. Acker, Thomas & Karen 3561 l78th Lane N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Disrud, Robert D. 3568 l78th Lane N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Gau, Jerome & Lois 17757 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Pavek, Lawrence Jr. & J. 17708 Quay Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Pankratz, Clarence & E. 17641 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Reckoff, M. & D. 3545 176th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Blue, George & B. 17541 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Norsten, Dennis & J. 17525 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Johnson, Walter & B. 17455 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Oleson, Eugene & Julie 17361 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Timber Trails Surrounding Residents The Menkveld Company Box 547 Anoka, MN 55303 Bollig, Loren & Emma 3705 l74th Avenue N.W. And,:)ver, MN 55304 Bergsagel, Irvin E. 3725 l74th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Gilpin, Gary & Janet 3735 l74th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Denny, Diana J. 3755 l74th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 DeGardner, Robert D. 10267 University Avenue N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 Sohr, William & Linda 3815 l74th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Sanderson, Alvin 3835 174th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Edwards, Robert & Harriet 3855 174th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Schaefer, Thomas H. & K. 3865 l74th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Johnson, Walter F. & Donna J. 3621 l73rd Lane N.W. Andover, MN 55304 City of Andover 1685 N.W. Crosstown Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 Dotseth, Oscar & G. 3639 174th AvenueN.W. Andover, MN 55304 Augdah1, James & Mary 3641 174th A~enue.N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Bai11ard, Randy & Patty 3921 l74th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Green, James & Kathryn 3953 l74th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 " .. , , Timber Trails Surrounding Residents Page Two o Gapp, David & ~fary J. 17421 Blackfoot Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Halter, Duane & Cathy 17461 Blackfoot Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Meyer, Ronald & Nancy 17501 Blackfoot Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Greer, David & Janet 17541 Blackfoot Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Bradley, Byron & Linda 17581 Blackfoot Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Vett1ing, Duane R. 17621 Blackfoot Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Dainsberg, Donald D. 17661 Blackfoot Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Nelson, Homer & Patricia 17691 Blackfoot Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Carlson, Lawrence B. & Marilyn 17750 Aztec Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Carlson, Lawrence B. & Marilyn 7101 Northland Circle, Suite 123 Minneapolis, MN 55428 McCormick, M. & Johnson, C. 17806 Aztec Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Lindberg, Bruce & Ruth 17822 Aztec Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Parent, David & Virginia 17900 Aztec Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 o Je11e, Robert & Joyce 17620 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 '\ Faris, Irene 17662 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Cooke, Raymond J. 17700 Tulip Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 I 1i'\ O~) CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 June 9, 1988 Department of Natural Resources Metro Region Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Gentlemen: Enclosed are the following: Public hearing notice regarding the preliminary plat of Timber Trails. Copy of the preliminary plat. If we do not hear from you within thirty days, we will assume that the plat meets with your approval. Sincerely, CITY OF ANDOVER ~tid Victoria Vo1k City Clerk Enclosures W:kt o ". Regular Planning Commission Meeting April 26, 1988 - Minutes Page 18 (Gene Brown Lot Split, Cont.) o of the R-4 zoning district~ 3) sewer stubs are available to each of the lots; water is available but is not required. Approval of the lot split is contingent upon the payment of park dedication fees and furnishing to the city the new legal descriptions prior to this ., being recorded. Motion carried unanimously. This will go to the City Council on May 17, 1988. Timber Trails Sketch Plan Byron Westlund noted that the City Council, in their review'of the sketch plan, asked for an access off of 178th Lane. Todd Haas stated that variances will be required for Block 4 as those lots are smaller than the required 2~ acres; however, they have 39,000 square feet of buildable land. Mr. Westlund explained that this property was in the platting stages 12 years ago and at that time, the roads were cut in. Chairman Perry noted that the Council pointed out that Lots 1 and 2, Block 5 may be considere~ by residents in the area as a park and those residents may object to their park being platted. commissioner Jacobson stated that along Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3 there is a power line easement and nothing can be built under that power line,. He felt that these lots are really restricted. Discussion centered on what size lots they need to have as the property is in an R-2 area which only requires one acre lots. Chairman Perry indicated that the Council was willing to look at variances to accomplish this development because it's a difficult piece of property to develop. Mr. Jacobson noted that Block 4 will have to have a variance. It was noted that the Council wants xenia Street to go north even if a variance is required. Pam Carlson, Woodland Development stated that their problem is that they are trying to work with the existing roads on the property. Ms. Bose11 stated that the Council has been pretty specific about what they feel is acceptable. The plat should meet the ordinances in as many respects as it can. Mr. Jacobson stated that there will be 11 variances on this plat. Ms. Perry noted that she has less of a problem with granting the variances if it will be consistent throughout the plat then on single lots in a development coming in. , Mr. Westlund was advised to proceed with his preliminary plat. o Ordinance 10 Amendment Discussion, Cont. ~ , , MOTION by Pease, seconded by Vistad to continue this item to a special meeting. Motion carried unanimously. - " '. Regula~ City Council Meeting MInutes - Ap~II 19, 1988 Page 5 o <Woodland Meadows St~eet Lighting, Continued) M~. Ca~lson stated he would be willing to take on the ~esponsibility of paying the maintenance on the vacant lots fo~ 5 yea~s, but he couldn't do it fo~eve~. Mayo~ WindschItl felt the co~~ect method would be to have eve~yone in the development sign a covenant to thei~ deed allowing the City to bill fo~ st~eet light maintenance. Bvron Westlund of Woodland Development - said most of those opposing liked the design of the st~eet lighting but didn't feel theyl we~e receiving any benefit. Councilman Apel suggested it is an ove~all benefit "to the neighborhood. Discussion was on the mechanics of getting eve~yone to file a convenant to thei~ deed. Ray Stacherski. 2156 176th Lane - stated most of the people we~e ~eally I.n favo~ of, st~eet lighting: But he didn/t know what the feeling would be about filing a covenant o~ if he would get the same numbe~ of signatu~es. He also ~elated seve~al incidents in thel~ neighbood whe~ethey may have been able to obtain license plate numbe~s o~ avoid the situation altogethe~ if the~e we~e st~eet lights in thei~ a~ea. Afte~ fu~the~ discussion, it was ag~eed Councilman Elling, M~. Cadson, M~. Westlund and Mr. Stacher:ski will attempt to get the signed convenants f~om eve~yone in the development. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by O~ttel, that we continue this item to the next ~egula~ly scheduled meeting. Motion ca~~ied on a 4-Yes, I-P~esent <Elling) vote. Late~ in the meeting Atto~ney Hawkins advised, in ~eviewing the statutes, he discove~ed a method whe~eby the City is autho~ized to bill fo~ st~eet lighting maintenance. Council ag~eed to discuss it fu~the~ at the May 2 meeting. WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT SKETCH PLAN - TIMBER TRAILS Council ~eviewed the sketch plan of Timbe~ T~ails off 174th between 178th and Seventh. Byron Westlund of Woodland Development explaIned the p~operty is zoned R-2 and should be changed to R-l. Council didn't think that was an Issue, as only 2 1/2-ac~e lot development is allowed in that po~tion of the City. M~. Westlund p~oposed the plat be developed in two phases. The southe~n half will be plated as Phase 1 of 28 two-and-a-half-ac~e lots. The conce~ns a~e Lot 3, Block 4 that will f~ont off-174th, and Lot 3. Block 5 and Lot 1. Block 4 will ~equi~e a va~iance because of f~ontage. ~ ~ " o Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - April 19, 1988 o Page 6 <Woodland Development Sketch Plan. Continued) Lary Carlson. Woodland Development. thought the roads had been cut through the area for about 12 years, and they will try to stay on them because it is a forested area. Mayor Windschitl stated many of the residents In the area think that Lots 1 and 2 of Block 5 are a city park, thinking they may want to explore that Issue with the Park Board. Mr. Carlson stated pe lives in that area and is aware of that situation. He stated no one has used i~ except for crossing with bikes, etc. They would prefer to keep them as lots. The City has a similiar park around 173rd. Mayor Windschiti was concerned about creating a landlocked piece of property to the north of Zenia. feeling access needs to be. provided for that property even if a variance is needed to do so. Mr. Carlson agreed to provide access to that land. preferring to have access from the north. Mayor Windschitl also thought this project would necessitate the blacktopping of Aztec down to the corner because if it isn/t done with this project, there wouldn/t be much assessable frontage left on that portion of the road. Mr. Carlson didn't have a problem doing that with his project. as he felt he could do it at a lower cost than the City; but he wanted to know how he could get some recovery from those on the other side of the stieet. Attorney Hawkins advised that in order to assess it. it must be done by the City. Council thought it would be very expensive to do that portion as a separate project. It was agreed Mr. Carlson will look into that further. Mr. Haas asked the Council/s opinion on the triangular-shaped lot in the middle of the piat. He had a drawing to eliminate that and creating two lots which would be more desirable lots. This adds one more lot to the plat, but variances may be needed for some of the lots. Mr. Carlson stated the average lot size is 2.86 acres. They would prefer the rectangular lots but didn't know if the Council would agree to varyIng the lots in that block. They would be 2.2 acres but are all high ground. Council agreed to eliminate the triangular lot, preferring the rectangular lots instead. The deveiopers were advised to proceed to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission. o ~ ~ .. ~ o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION S+-Q ~ c.~(hfYl;ike ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NO. BY: Todd J. Haas BY: FOR CD Engineering ITEM NO. Park Comprehensive Plan, cont. 1',,,, The City Council is requested to approve the expenditures of funds to come out of park dedication fees for updating the park comprehensive plan for Task 1 and 2. See attached fee schedule for each task. Marc McMullen, Park and Recreation Chairman will be here to discuss this item. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY - -j ). ( ( o Park and Recreation C~mmission Meeting May 19, 1988 - Minutes Page Seven > MOTION by Sabel, seconded by Ferris, to direct Westwood Planning and Engineering to complete Task 1 and Task 2 as outlined in the letter by Tim Erkkila in a letter dated May 19, 1988 for costs not to exceed $600 (out of the park dedication fund) and to prepare a report including the results to the Park Commissioners by June 9th. All voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. The Commissioners,agreed to review the results at the June 16th meeting, and that 'it would not be necessary to have Mr. Erkkila present at that meeting. Mr. Erkkila asked if there were any communities the Park Board would like included in the report. (Coon Rapids~ Champlin and Blaine were communities suggested by the Park Board.) Mr. McMullen directed Todd Haas to have a letter prepared asking Westwood Planning to complete Tasks 1 and 2 (for the City of Andover) as stated in Westwood's letter of May 19, 1988. RED OAKS MANOR 5TH ADDITION PARK DEDICATION It was agreed by all the Commissioners to table this agenda item. A letter was presented from Mr. Arthur K. Raudio who is a partner in the Andover Joint Venture. The letter stated that the City Council has been involved with the DNR in discussing possible mitigations involving certain portions of the proposed plat. OTHER BUSINESS Carlson's Park - Timber Trail Mr. McMullen and Mr. Stone visited this proposed park site. They found several things that would need to be done before it would be in a proper condition. The snow fence would need to be removed, along with the bleachers, lights, and scoreboard, and it would also be n~cessary to take down the warming house. Mr. McMullen stated that the Council had advised the Park Board not to accept services in lieu of cash. Todd Haas suggested.that the Commission invite Mr. Carlson to attend the next Park Meeting to further discuss this item. Frank Stone - Sod Field o Frank Stone indicated that ~od farmer, Mr. Magnuson, made .an offer to the Park Board to ti~l the thick area by the soccer field area and seed it for no charge, if he received a written letter from the City with this request. -'"-j' ( WESTWOOD PLANNING Be ENGINEERING COMPANY c:> May 19, 1988 Andover Parks Commission c/o Todd Haas 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 55304 RE: Park System Planning Greetings: Thank you for allowing me to visit with you on park system planning last month. As requested, I have estimated the costs of several specific park planning . tasks. Our description of services and fees for these tasks is as follows: Task 1 - Review Park Dedication Requirements - Westwood shall examine the present park dedication requirements and compare them to 5-6 other relevant communities to illustrate how Andover compares. The estimated cost for this is $300.00 Task 2 - Review Per Capita municipal spending on Parks - Westwood shall examine the current park expenditures and budget for the City and compare them to 5-6 other relevant communities to illustrate how Andover compares. The estimated cost for this is $300.00. Task 3 - Development Strategies - Westwood shall review the development patterns in the City with close attention to the delivery of park facilities in both the urban and rural areas. Westwood shall develop standards and a classification system for neighborhood park site sizing and spacing. The estimated cost for this is $750.00. Task 4 - Overview Trail System Options - Westwood shall review City, County, and State road and trail plans to evaluate how extensive a trail system would be developed without city parks dedication. This is necessary since system wide trail development requires land for trails (and often money for trail' paving) that often comes from sources beyond municipal park dedication requirements. A summary finding statement will discuss the interrelationship of par~ and nonpark elements of a trail system to clarify the future role of the Parks Commission on trail matters. This is not a trails master plan, it is only an overview of issues and suggestion of options. The estimated cost for this is $850.00. Task 5 - Demographics Analysis - Westwood shall utilize existing City data to outline current population characteristics (age, household size, income and locations) to clarify the present recreational needs of the City. This data shall be modified to predict future patterns (total population, ages, distributions) and to assist in predicting future needs. Either a 5 or 10 year future scenario will be prepared. The estimated cost for this task is $1,000.00. o ... 8525 EDINBROOK CROSSING. BROOKLYN PARK. MINNESOTA 55443 (612) 424-8862 (Business Ofllce) 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, ST. lOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55426 (612) 54..0155 , , r"~ I r' '- o Andover Parks Commission Page two- Task 6 - Review Availability of Grants - Westwood shall outline the status of the current grants programs for park acquisition and development. The estimated cost for this task is $200.00. Task 7 - Planning District Boundaries - Using the strategies developed in task 3 and the demographic data generated in task 5, a system for dividing the City into park neighborhoods shall be developed. This shall be helpful in determining park and recreational needs in the various portions of the City. The estimated cost of services is $500.00. Total fee for tasks 1-7: $3,900.00 Task 8 - Presentations to the City - Task 1-7 are study tasks, not including presentations. Westwood shall furnish a park planner to either Park Commission or Council meetings on a per event basis. The cost shall be $125 per meeting. All fees shall be billed as incurred up to the total of all assigned tasks based on the attached fee schedule. The total study cost listed herein is a "not to exceed" figure. The consultant reserves the right to switch excess charges from one task to other unused portions of this services agreement. The City can award none, any, or all of the 8 tasks listed here to the consultant. All work shall be billed monthly, based on the pro-rata amount of work performed during the previous month. All invoices are due and payable 30 days from the date of invoice. Any additional reports, studies, or services ordered by the City shall be performed on a per diem basis in accordance with the attached fee l;chedule. EQUIPMENT NEEDED The consultant will provide at ~ extra reimbursement the following items: * Transportation: personal or company cars * Photocopying: up to 15 copies * Typing and word proc~ssing (with company equipment). * All drawing and drafting supplies with company equipment. The City shall be expected to provide the following items: * * Demographic data (as available) A verification (graphically) of all city park land. This could be a set of marked up half section maps. Copies of all relevant planning studies and source data. Mylars or negatives of the current City base map(s) which need to be used. This can be on a "loan basis". Any additional printing, or special color printings, enlargements, foam core mountings, etc. of final products (if desired by the City). " * * o * ( c:> Andover Parks Commission page three- TIMING Westwood shall complete the studies by August 19, 1988. It is presently expected that at least monthly meeting with the Park Commission shall be needed for the next 2-3 months. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon fourteen days written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination, Westwood shall be paid compensation for services performed to the termination date. Upon payment, any and all obligations and 1iabi1ites of the parties hereto shall terminate. SUMMARY I view this proposal as representing a very reasonable method for the City of Andover to reassess its directions and options prior to updating its park system plan. These seven tasks are very clearly the most appropriate questions the City needs to be asking on parks at this time. The work included here could become the heart of your next plan. With only some additional text and maps a complete park system plan could be made. I further encourage you to undertake this initial study as a method to achieve an understanding with the City Council prior to preparing the final system plan. I will look forward to hearing from you on this project. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY \A~ Tim Erkkila, ASLA Vice President, Planning TE:1s attachments (fee schedule) CONDITIONS ACCEPTED BY CITY OF ANDOVER: Authorizing Signature o Date ... , . \\1'~; .. :~= -" =:=~ WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY o FEE SCHEDULE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAY I, 1987 (' In general, where it is possible to determine in advance the Scope of a Project and the time and effort the Project will require, the fee basis for Engineering Services will be a percentage of construction cost or lump sum. Where this is impossible, because of the complex nature of work tasks that are variable in nature and where the time required is controlled by the Client, citizen involvement and environmental problems; where the time requi rement is beyond' the control of the Consul tant, the foll owi ng fee schedul e will apply'- Classification Principal Engineer..................................... Principal Planner/Landscape Architect.................. Senior Project Planner/Landscape Architect............. Project Engineer...................................... Project Landscape Architect............................ Engineer............................................... Landscape Architect/Planner.~.......................... , Senior Engineering Technician.......................... Engineering Technician................................. Associate Landscape Architect......................,... Planner................................................ Draftsman.............................................. Typist................................................. Senior Construction Coordinator........................ Construction Observer.................................. Two-Man Survey Crew.~.................................. Three-Man Survey Crew.................................. o Computer Rate.......................................... Computer Draftsman..............~...................... 8525 EDINBROOK CROSSING. BROOKLYN PARK. MINNESOTA 55443 (612) 424.8862 (Business Office) 7415 WAVZATA BOULEVARD, ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55426 (612) 546-0155 Hourly Rate $ 63.00 63.00 54.00 50.00 50.00 46.00 46.00 39.00 32.00 38.00 30.00 30.00 22.00 42.00 38.00 65.00 80.00 30.00 38.00 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE AGENDA ~~ECTION (lL" NO. S\-<{tt, CO{Y)(?)j -"c.--e, , COflJ/l) ITEM NQ Fox Meadows park Access ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering BV:Todd J. Haas June 21, 1988 ~~ APPROV~~DtOR AGEN UIJ The City Council is requested to approve the layout for Fox Meadows Park. See attached drawing. The Park Commission had discussed the item on the May 5, 1988 agenda. Area residents attended the meeting asking the Park Commission to consider lowering the intensity of use for the park to something similar to neighborhood parks. The Fox Meadows Park is one of four regional parks in the City of Andover. The residents are also concerned about the park access. Attached are letters from the Anoka County Highway Department regarding the park access and othe,r road alignments. Marc McMullen will be present at the meeting to discuss this item. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY 1 ,j I COUNTY OF ANOKA Department of Highways Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520 May 31, 1988 M.,:'A J f C ffit.-D~ "J 4'____ & .~ 0 1 1988 7 - CITY OF ANDOVER City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN. 55304 Attention: James Schrantz, City Manager Subject: Fox Meadows Park Dear Mr. Schrantz: We have had questions addressed to us regarding access to the city Park in the Fox Meadows Addition located near the intersection of CR #58 (South) and CSAH #7. It is our opinion that access should not be provided from CSAH #7, and it would be preferable if it, were not provided from CR #58. We are also aware of the concerns of the residents on Fox Street regarding access and increased traffic. An option to consider would be the relocation of the intersection of CR #58 and CSAH #7 to a point north of Tom Thumb store. If the city provided the right-of-way (120 feet) for this change, we would recommend to the County Board that the necessary construction be done. The existing roadway and right-of-way on CR #58 from CSAH #7 to Fox Street would be turned over to the city. An additional part of this redesignation would be the transfer of the east-west segment of CR #58 from CSAH #7 to Valley View Drive from county designation to the city. You have designated this segment as a MSA Street and are drawing ~ needs and maintenance funds on it, and it really doesn't fit logically in the county system. o ... Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer o o -2- We will continue to work with you on the park access problem and invite your comments relative to possible solutions. Z:2~ Paul K. Ruud, PE County Engineer ... -- I -- _. .-. -..-.....- I.,'. , ( . ---L-(-_J _ .:...~~i~:fi...H-~7: ':\ U~~'{~) ,.~,!. .. I~. /'\1... n'i' i. o , ->:: O~ ~\l) -~~ ~~ -', I'~ ....~ 10;') I \ I " /. .--: --.,); ~ .~ i~ =r ~ ~ . ~~ ~ Sl ':-' ~ 0 ~ t1' --\ \1) ~ 1 7' >K~ 0\- - I-t. --t\ C"\ ~ ~ - -:..vaJIi,.....!~.t':O"".'~'! ( ( COUNTY OF ANOKA Department of Highways Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520 \ , .m:~ May 12, 1988 city of Andover 1685 Crosstown Andover, MN. Boulevard NW 55304 Attention: Jim Schrantz Regarding: Park Access for city Park located on CR #58 and Fox Street Dear Jim: We have reviewed a sketch indicating access which is to be constructed for the park onCR #58/Va11ey Drive and Fox Street. We recommend the access be constructed as indicated from the city Street. This recommendation is in accordance with that which we use on all other developments. Driveways should access the residential streets, residential street access collectors and the collectors access the minor arterials wherever possible. This places the scattered random turn movements on the lowest volume streets which are the safest upon which to make these turns. In this specific instance, Fox street provides the safest location for an access to the park. If you should have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 74~~ William A. Sironen, PE Assistant County Engineer - Administration o ... Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer . , I I I I I I I . 1 .. ~ ~ , ] r- I ~~ I q:, Z' -rt; ~i' -+t ~ l\) ~ -r--~ 0) %;- , ~ ..... C5~ ~ :t: - ~ l" ~ ~7{ Z; 9' . " ! I , . 0 ~ ~~& ~ ~; ~ ~:~ ., ~ ~ ~ ~ '" -:::::. \'" .. ai:.. r ~ ,&;. ~ ~.. '" .. ~~. ~ 't~ : ..' ~... ':...' ~ ( "" . '" ei . . .. "" ~ . . "'. h' ... "" ~;. , ... ~~....' .l!:. lo >t . ~.. ...., - ~~ I ~ ~ ~ If "!>1 ~ "P.t' . ~ . ~I -,.6.~f/ltle: . ( t .:~~'.~~-~ -A.I~!;~~-~ ;~;;(j(j;j~~-;- -~"7'LJ~;;~~-r-!~;;j~'i~-;. ~{+~~.'L ~'" \J&ilVVf\~ _. . Vi t ./.. . .f.I.#t;Tfi' "I!"tt("~'1 fltt;Tn t ' lOr- r. ~ 7Tij...~~", AVE~l:JE: -:-'-::..7:,:~' . -~-rl': - - , COUNTY, ST. - .-......- 'i.i)..,.' '~ ,- .' ~I . I //'./- /. ........... '" ...",' ~~\ .......- _. .Rw~'-.JI~ ! "'-' .~\: ~I ~. I /;( '... ..... ~k s ;" ......~ ..,'>.....' ',~, 't"'/' .... "':"C)-.... .... ~~ : ;" ... I ~-'-~ ~l.. ~..' . ...:':"....r.,.I'. .... "":' /" ./.1': , ...~.., I.. :'~..,. ".."/ / 1 -...,.........r~ ......~...~y... . t '" .~ /,'" I -~"""" "'. ')lil.-...., ,.,;/. ~/' I . '" ~~"~J' " '/' ..v~ <~/. ,./ ' "',J /,........ .1/. -'.... /". /" d.,.,.';,.,? .. .. ,// / ~."..o\o ~.~ ,/ ,/ ".. "', ,"" '" ".- 40 ".- - . ~ ,. .. ........ ~.~ f..~. "..r....' . ~/ " ./' +,,, ".. .../ . ,. :"-' <,4>...../ --./ "../ ~./ ,// . ./ ~ ,/./- ~ ".- / ;/ ...--- ~H------ ..-... ~~ <> '- 'b h. =ll =-: !~ ~~ l; ,,' !~ ,~- I. -~ -..- /. "/// ,/ . ,/ -_:-:. ../ ./ _./ / ~ ... 0, '" ~ .... .... ~ ~ ~~ ......................... ................. g .............. 0 ............ iUI 'I #""'.JTIfI' "" g o. i; \ .. ",-': .. ;. ~: ~ ~~ "~ ~ " a. '" ~.~ '- -::::- ~,,- '" -~ " , o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee Commission ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering APPROVED FOR AG"NOAa ITEM NO. Approve Overnight Camping/Woodland Cr. Bl~es E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve S.J. Louis's employees to stay at the site in their campers overnight to prevent vandalism. See attached request. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o o o , ,--' 5. J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION. INC. P.O. Box 1373 St. Cloud, MN 56302 (612) 253-9291 June 6, 1966 Ci ty of Andover 1665 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 RE: Andover Project Dear Sir: Due to some vandalism on our project, we have hired some people to stay on the site overnight. They are staying in campers. They are there to secure our equipment and for tile safety of the public. We are requesting a permit for the campers to be there. If you have any Questions, feel free to contact our office. Si ncere II~, D (Q~.U& /~tL Lg Denis Holthaus Foreman o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Com i i ~ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning ITEM NQ Subgrantee Agreement/ CDBG BY: Daryl D. Morey WM BY: The City Council is requested to approve the attached Su grantee Agreement between the City of And~ver and Anoka County for 1988 CDBG projects. The City Council approved the 1988 CDBG Budget at the March 15, 1988 meeting. The Subgrantee Agreement allows Anoka county to distribute funds to the city in accordance with the 1988 CDBG Budget. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY (I CO U N TY OF [)In ANOKA Office of the County Board of Commissioners COURTHOUSE ANOKA,MINNESOTA55303 612-421-4760 ?LtfCg- tP./ '12./lrY Mc->vr:>11 ;:::n<- ,4 ;?,<tR'Yln..- ! 'i t1 ~~: H~ i~~; "[~';j11 I hf'~z:'c:' c', ." "':;1 iJ I , 't j ,. J" - n '(\~ . -L'j . J l iii ,lA' i ,;. ;'8 !-'~i /' ~'TYO~ ^"':~VE~ 4 ! I June 8, 1988 Mr. Jim Schrantz, City Administrator City of Andover Community Center 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N. W. Andover, Minnesota 55304 Re: 1988 Community Development Block Grant Subgrantee Agreements Dear Jim: I am enclosing three copies of the SUbgrantee Agreement for the City of Andover 1988 CDB:; projects. Please obtain the appropriate signatures and return all three copies to my office as soon as possible. I will return one fully executed copy to you. This is not an authorization to proceed. We are still awaiting notice fom HOD and expect that funds will be available July 1. You will receive a fonnal notice to proceed when possible. If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 1178. Sincerely, 9zd~--/ JoAnn o. Wright Community Development Manager JC1iJ:sw Enclosures o , Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer ~1 o ~ CIXINlY CXJHJNr1Y IEVEI:DIMEBr BUXX GlmNr lKGWI 1\GREEJ!ENr bebleen MIJJ.Q\ anny, A :FOLI'l'ICAL SUBDIVISICIl OF 'lEE S'IME OF MINNErorA AND CI'lY OF ANOOVER '1hi.s agreement, entered into this day of , 1988, between Anoka Co\mty, a political subdivision of the state of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "County"), am the City of Andover (hereinafter referred to as the l1\gency"): HrX;l'J:AIS A. '!he County is an U1:ban COI.Ulty applicant for block grant ~ urrler the Housirq am Conummity Development Act of 1974 (the Act), Pub. L. 93-383 as arrended, am will receive block grant ~ for the purpose of can:yin:J out eligible camm.mi.ty development am housirq activities urrler the Act am umer regulations pranulgated by the ~t of Housing am Urtlan Development (HUD) at 24 em p. 570; B. An Uman County Consortimn has been established by a Joint Cooperation Agreement between the County am nnmicipal cmporations within the County, the tenns of which specify allocation of block grant ~ to those participating jurisdictions for use in accordance with the County Housing Assistance am Conummity Development Plans acx::epted by participating jurisdictions am reviewed by HUD; c. '!he County desires to have certain savices perfonned by the 1\gency as described. within this agreement, am as authorized by Anoka Co\mty resolutions for the purpose of inplernentirq eligible activities urrler the Act am HUD regulations; D. It is appropriate am mutually desirable that the 1\gency be designated by the County to urdertake the aforementioned eligible activities, so long as the requirements of the Act, HUD Regulations, state law am local law are adhered to, as provided for herein; E. '!he purpose of this 1lgreement is to provide for oooperation between the County am the 1\gency, as the parties in this agreement, in inplernentin:J such eligible activities in the manner described above; F. '!he parties . are authorized am enp:JWered to enter into this Agreement by the laws of the state of Minnesota. o ... - 1 - o o G. '!he follCMin;J attachments as listed belCM are hereby incorporated in this agreement am made a part hereof: PARI' I. PARI' II. PARI' III. Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. GENERAL CDNDITIONS FEDERAL AND I.CX:AL PROGRAM ~ EVAIlJATION AND REO:>RD KEEPING Specific Objectives for 1988 Anoka County COEG Program Certified Motion of May 18, 1988 Anoka ComIty Board Resolution No. 85-42 Anoka County Board Resolution No. 85-23 H. '!he Agency's PrelilninaIy Project Request Fo:cn is on file in the CoImmmi.ty Development Office, County Administration, Anoka County Courthouse, Anoka, MN 55303, am is hereby incorporated in this AGreement am made a part hereof. I. In consideration of payments, covenants, am agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made am perfonned by the parties hereto, the parties mutually covenant am agree as provided for in this agl:eenelt. <XXJNlY 1\GENCl( Tim Yantos Deputy County Administrator Date: (Signature) Name (Typed) Approved as to fo:cn: Title Date: Assistant Anoka County Attorney , - 2 - o 10 PARr I. GENERAL a:tID1TICH; 1. smPE OF 1IGRImmn' '!he 1\greE!n'ent between the parties shall consist of the signature page, the general con:ti.tions; the federal, state ard local program requirements; the evaluation ard recom keeping requirements, each ard every project exhibit incorporated into the Agreement; all matters ard laws incorporated by reference herein; ard any written arnerXIments made according to the general con:ti.tions. '!his Agreement supersedes any ard all fanner agreements applicable to projects attached as exhibits to this Agreement. 2. SOOPE OF SERVICES '!he Agercy shall perfonn ard carry out in a satisfactory ard proper manner the services set forth in the Exhibit(s) attached hereto. '!his Agreement may be amended from tilne to tilne, in accordance with the general con:litions, for the purpose of adding new projects, amending the scope of work, or for any other lawful. purpose. 3. ~ AND 'I'EDtINATICN OF ~ Upon release of project-related fun:3s by HtJD p.1rsuant to federal regulations, the COtmty shall furnish the Agercy with written notice to proceed. No work on the oro;ect shall occur orior to the notice to oroceed without written acoroval from the Countv. Tern1ination dates for in:lividual projects shall be specified in the appropriate exhibits ard be in a:mpliance with Colmty Board Resolution #85-23, attached as Exhibit c. COsts incurred after the tennination date will not be reimbursed. '!he tennination date may be chan;Jed through cnrerx:hnent of this Agreement. 4. MMINIS'IRATICN A. '!he Aaencv shall appoint a liaison Person who shall be responsible for overall administration of block arant funded oro;ect(s) ard coordination with the Countv Housincr ard communitv Develoanent Proaram. '!he k:Iencv shall also desianate one or more reoresentatives who shall be authorized to sian the month! v Voucher ard Reoortincr Fonn. '!he names of the liaison persons and reoresentatives shall be scecified in the Exhibits. B. For all agencies which are presently parties to Joint Cooperation Agreements with the COtmty covering planning, distribution of fun:3s, ani p1.ujl.clllI execution under the Act, the Agercy remains subject to the previsionS of such ag1:eement. 5. a:MPmSATICN AND ME:lH)D OF PAYMENl' A. '!he County shall reimburse the Agercy for the services specified in the Exhibits in an amount not to exceed the amount specified on Exhibit A. Reill1bursement shall be based on a Conm.mi.ty Developnent Voucher ard ... - 3 - o Reporting FODll subnitted with supporting documents ani signed by the Agency's authorized representative. '!he Agency shall subnit a properly executed Voucher ani Reporting Fonn no later than fifteen (15) working days after the close of each billing period. '!he County will make payment to the Agency not lOOre than twenty-one (21) working days after said invoice is received ani approved by Anoka County. '!he County will issue a statement of correction voucher in the event that the voucher request is erroneous. Payment does not constitute absolute approval. . 6. OPERATlJiG BJOOEl' B. '!he Agency shall apply the furxis receiVed from the County under this Agreement in accordance with the requirements of the Exhibit(s) attached hereto. 7. FONDDC AIIl'ERNATIVES AND FUroRE SUPl-UKJ.' A. '!he Agen::;y shall report all project i.ncane generated under this Agreement for the purposes specified herein or generated through the project(s) fun::ied urx:1er this Agreement. All project i.ncane shall be forwarded to Anoka County. '!he County will maintain a record of program i.ncane received by intividual projects for future use by the subgrantee for eligible COB:; activities. B. '!he County makes no conuni.tment to future support ani assumes no obligation for future support of the activities contracted for herein, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. c. Should anticipated sources of revenue not becane available to the County for use in the Corcmmi.ty Development Block Program, the County shall :imnediate1y notify the At:}en::;y in writing ani the County will be released from all contracted liability for that portion of the Agreement covered by furxis not received by the County. 8. AMEMMENIS Either party may request IOCldifications in the scope of services, tenus, or corx1i.tions of this Agreement. Proposed IOCldifications which are mutually agreed upon shall be incorp:>rated by written arrerx:tment to this Agreement. A written arrerx:tment may affect a project or projects authorized by this Agreement or may be of general application. 9. ASSIGMENl' AND ~ A. '!he At:}en::;y shall not assign any portion of this Agreement without the written consent of the County, an:! it is further agreed that said consent must be sought by the At:}ercy not less than fifteen (15) daYS prior to the date of any proposed assignment. o , - 4 - o o B. Mr:i work or se%Vices assigned or subcontracted hereun:ler shall be subject to each provision of this Agreement am proper biddi.rg procedures contained therein. '!he 1v:Jercy agrees that it is as fully responsible to the Colmty for the acts am omissions of its subcontractors am of their enployees am agents, as it is for the acts am omissions of its own enployees am agents. 10. R:>ID ~ AND INIEfiIFICATICN A. '!he 1v:Jercy further agrees that it is financially responsible (liable) for any audit exception which occurs due to its negligence of failure to CCIIlply with the tenns of the Agreement. B. '!he Agercy agrees to protect am save the County, its elected and appointed officials, agents, and enployees while acting within the scope of their duties as such, hannless from am against all clailns, demands, am causes of action of any Jcinj or character, including the cost of defense thereof, arising in favor of the 1v:Jercy's enployees or third parties on account of personal injuries., death, or damage to property arising out of . se%Vices PerfoDlled or anissions of ser.rices or in any way resulting from the acts or omissions of the 1v:Jercy and/or its agents, enployees, subcontractors or representatives l.1I'Xler this lv:Jreement. 11. INSORANCE For all agencies which are not municipal corporations organized l.1I'Xler the laws of the state of Minnesota, the followi..n1 insurance requirements shall apply: A. Public Liabilitv Insurance '!he Agercy shall obtain and maintain. continuously public liability insurance necessaxy to. protect the public on the subject prF!llli ~'ElS naming the County as insured to the extent of six Hurored '!housarXl and no/100 ($600,000.00) Dollars General Liability Insurance including bodily injUlY am property damage with umbrella excess liability of One Million am no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars am provide proof of, Worker's Cclltpensation Insurance pursuant to the statutes of the state of Minnesota. B. BJildina Risk Insurance '!he Agercy shall cause to be maintained, during the period that contract work is in pl:og:t;ess, All Risk arllder's Insurance, (including fire, van:'Ialism, malicious mischief am ext:erxied coverages) in an anount not less than the value of destructible contract work in place. Proof of Insurance c. '!he Aqercy shall provide certificates of insurance required l.1I'Xler this section, or, upon request of the Colmty, duplicates of the policies as ... - 5 - o o evidence of the insurance protection afforded. SUch insurance policies shall not be reduced or cancelled without sixty (60) days prior written notice to the County. 12. a:tWIJ:cr OF Drl~.r A. Interest of Officers. Emolovees. or lIaents - No employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of the h:;JerY::J who exercises arrt functions or responsibilities with respect to Block Grant Program activities assisted urxler this Program or who are in a position to participate in a decision making process or gain inside infonnation with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from the activity, or have an ihterest in arrt contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the p~s thereun:ler, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties, during their ternJre or for one year thereafter . B. Interest of SUbcontractor and '!heir Emo1ovees - '!he 1>qen:::y agrees that it will incorporate into every subcontract required to be in writing and made pursuant to this 1Igreement the followin;J provisions: '!he contractor covenants that no person who presently exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the Block Grant Program, has arrt personal financial interest, direct or irxtirect, in this Contract. '!he Contractor further covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire arrt interest, direct or irxlirect, which would conflict in arrt manner or degree with the perfonnance of his services hereurxler. '!he Contractor further covenants that in the perfonnance of this Contract no person having arrt conflicting interest shall be employed. Any interest on the part of the contractor or his employees lIIUSt be disciosed to the 1>qen:::y and the County. 13. DATA FRJ:VAcr All data collected, created, receiVed, maintained, or r'li"'<=minated, or used for arrt purposes in the course of the Provider's perfonnance of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota statutes 1984, Section 13.01 et seq. or arrt other applicable State statutes and arrt State rules adopted to inplement the Act, as well as State statutes and Federal regulations on data privacy. '!he Provider agrees to abide by these statutes, rules, and regulations and as they may be amen:1ed. 14. TEDfiNAT.ICN A. '!his Agreement is subject to tennination upon thirty (30) days written notice by the County should: ... - 6 - o (1) '!he hJency mismanage or make inproper or unlawful use of Agreement fun1s ; (2) '!he hJency fail to ccmply with the terms ani corxtitions expressed herein or the applicable regulations and directives of the Federal Goverrnnent, state, or County; (3) '!he hJency fail to provide work or services expressed by this 1\greement; or (4) '!he hJency fail to submit reports or submit i.ncc:lnp1ete or inaccurate reports in arrj material respect. , B. '!his Agreement may be tenninated by the Colmty i1nne::liately upon the receipt by the County of notice of the loss of federal fun:ling for the Comnnmity DeveloplOOIlt Block Grant Program or arrj project of the hJency. c. '!his 1\greement is subject to tennination upon thirty (30) days written notice by the Agency should: (1) '!he County fail in its commitment un::ler this 1\greement to provide fun:ling for services ren:lered, as l..e:..ein provided; or (2) Block Grant fun1s become no longer available fran the Federal Government or through the County. D. othawise this Agreement shall tenninate on the latest tennination date specified on the Exhibit(s) attached hereto ani shall be subject to extension only by mutual agreement ani ameOOment in accordance with the General COrxiitions of this Agreement. . E. Upon tennination of this Agl:eement arrj unexpen:ied balance of Agreement fun1s shall remain in the County Block Grant furXl. F. In the event that tennination occurs urXler paragrar:n A(l) of this section, the Agency shall return to the County all fun1s which were experxled in violation of the terms of this Agreement. PARr II. FEIERAL AND I.OCAL PROGRAM REJ:UI:REHFNI'S 1. GmmAL !<&JU~ '!he Agency shall ccmply with the Hous:ln;J and Comrm.mi.ty Developnent Act of 1974, Public law 93-383 .5Yi! amended, ani Inplementi.rg Regulations at 24 em p. 570. o ... -7- o o 2. ~ S'mNDi\ROO 3. In awardi.n;J contracts pursuant to this Agreement, the Iv:1ercy shall c:amply with all ar:plicable requirements of local ani state law for awarcli.n; contracts, includi.rg but not limited to procedures for canpetitive bidd.in;J, contractor's boms, ani retained percentages. In addition, the Iv:1er'C'f shall c:amply with the requirements of the U.S. Office of Management ani Budget Circular A-102 or A-110 as appropriate, relatirg to bon:tin;J, insurance ani procurement standards: ani with Executive order 11246 reganti.rq norrl; <=l""T"imination bid corxlitions for projects over Ten 'lhousard ani no/100 ($10,000.00) Dollars. Where federal st.aJmrds differ from local or state stamards, the stricter st.aJmrds shall apply. '!he federal stan:Iard of Ten 'lhousand ani no/100 ($10,000.00) Dollars for canpetitive biddin;r shall ar:ply only if the applicable state or local st:an::Jard for '-'U1llf?t:'titive bidd:in;J is less strict than Ten 'lhousard ani no/100 ($10,000.00) Dollars. ~ :REVIE)i A. National Envirornnental Policv Act - '!he County retains envirornnental review :responsibility for ~ of fulfillin;J requirements of the National Envirorunenta1 Policy Act as implemented by HOD Envirornnental Review Procedures (29 CFR pt. 58). '!he County may require the Iv:1ercy to fuJ::nish data, information ani assistance for the County's review ani asses=oent in detenni.nin:J whether an Env:i:rornnenta1 IIrpict staterrent llUlSt be prepared. B. state Envirornnental Policv Act - Iv:1encies which are branches of govennnent un:ler Minnesota Iaw retain :responsibility for fulfillin;J the requirements of the state Iaw regarclin:J envi.:rornnental policy ani conservation, ani regulations ani o:rdinances adopted thereurxier. If the agercy is not a, branch of govennnent un:ler Minnesota law, the county may require the, agercy to fuJ::nish,data, information ani assistance as necessary to enable the county to c:amp1y with the state Env:i:rornnenta1 Policy Act. . c. satisfaction of Envirornnental Reauirements - Project execution umer this Agreement by either the County or the Iv:1ercy shall not proceed until satisfaction of all applicable requirements of the National ani state Envirornnental Policy Acts. A written notice to proceed will not be issued by the county until all such requirements are c:amplied with. 4. ~CN A. General '!he Iv:1ercy shall c:amply with all federal, state ani local laws prohibitirg discrimination on the basis of age, sex, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical haniicap or any other basis now or. hereafter prohibited by Iaw. 'lhese requirements are specified in Section 109 of the Housin;J ani camuni.ty Devel~ Act of 1974: civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VIi Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VIIIi Executive Order ... - 8 - o 11063; Executive Order 11246; am Section 3 of the HOUSirg ani Urban Developnent Act of 1968. Specifically, the Agercy is prohibite:i from takin:J arrz discrindnatory actions defined in the BUD Regulations at 24 CPR 570.602(b) (1-3) am shall take such affimative ani corrective actions as are required by the Regulations at em 570.602 (b) (4). '!hese requirements are SUlm'llarized in the followirg paragraphs: B. Pl:u:ll.alu Benefit '!he lv:Jercy shall not discriminate against arrz resident of the project service area by denyirg benefit from or participation in any block grant furxied activity on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin. (Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI; civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VII; Section 109, Housirg am Ccmrlnmity Developnent Act of 1974). C. Fair Housincr '!he Aqercy shall take necessary am appropriate actions to prevent discrimination in federally assisted housirg am lerxlinJ practices related to loans insured or guaranteed by the federal government. (Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VII; Executive Order 11063) D. EmP10vment 1. In all solicitations urder this 1\gl:eement, the lv:Jercy shall state that all qualified. applicants will be considered for enployment. '!he words "equal opportunity enployer" in advertisements shall constitute compliance with this section. 2. '!he Aqercy shall not discriminate against an enployee or applicant for enployment in connection with this Agreement because of age, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical harrlicap, except when there is a bona fide OCC'lpCltional limitation. SUch action shall include, but not be limite:i to the following: Employment, ~din;J, demotion or transfer, recn1i.tment or recn1i.tment advertisirg, layoff or tennination, rates of pay or other foJ:IlLS of canpensation, am selection for trainin;J. (Executive Order 11246 as ameOOed) 3. To the greatest extent feasible, the Aqercy shall provide trainin;J ani enployment opportunities for lower income residents within the area served by block grant assisted projects (Section 3, Housirg ani Camnunity Development Act of 1968, as ameOOed). E. Contractors am SUcoliers 1. No contractor, subcontractor, union or verXlor en;aged in any activity urx1er this Agreement shall discriminate in the sale of materials, equipnent or labor on the basis of age, sex, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, or the presence Qf arrz sensory, mental, or physical harrlicap. SUch practices include o ... - 9 - o "0 upgrading, denDtion, recnti.tin;J, transfer, layoff, tennination, pay rate, am advertisement for employment. (Executive order 11246 as amerxled) All fims am organizations described above shall be required to sul:mit to the Aqercy certificates of CCIlpliance deIoonstratin;J that they have, in fact, CCIlplied with the foregoin;J provisions~ provided, that certificates of CCIlpliance shall not be required fran fims am organizations on contracts arojor yearly sales of less than $10,000. To the greatest extent feasible, the Aqercy shall purchase supplies am services for activities un::ier this' agreement from vendors am contractors whose businesses are located in the area served by block grant funied activities or owned in substantial part by project area residents. (section 3, Housin;J am Cc:mnuni:ty Development Act of 1968, as amerxled.) F. Notice 2. 3. 1. 'lhe kJercv shall include the provJ.SJ.ons of the approoriate subsections A. B. C, D. am E of this section in everv contract or PUrChase order for qoods am services urxier this Aareement am shall sen:l to each labor mri.on or representative of workers with which it has a collective barga.ini.nq agreement or other contract or urx:iers1:arrli a notice . advisin;J the said labor mri.on or worker's representative of the commitments made in these subsections. 2. In advertisin;J for employees, goods or services for activities urxier this Ayl.eement, the agercy shall utilize minority publications in addition to publications of general circulation. 5. IABJR STANI:lAROO 'lhe Aqercy shall require that project construction contractors am . subcontractors pay their laborers am med1ani.cs at wage rates in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, as amerxled (40 use sections 327-333) ~ provided that this section shall not apply to rehabilitation of residential property designed for residential use by fewer than eight families. A copy of the current Davis-Bacon wage rate must be included in all constructi.on bid specs am contracts OI/er Two 'lhousard am no/100 ($2,000.00) Dollars. 6. PR>PERlY ~ A. '!he Aqercy agrees that any nonexpenJable personal property, purchased wholly or in part with agreement :fuOOs at a cost of 'lhree Hurxh'ed am no/100 ($300.00) Dollars or IIOre per item, is upon .its purchase or receipt the property of the Colmty arojor federal gOl/enunent. Final ownership am disposition of such property shall be det:enn:ined un::ier ... - 10 - o o B. the provisions of Apperxtix N to the u. S. Office. of Managexrent cm:1 Budget Circular No. A-102 or A-110 as appropriate. , '!he At:Jercy shall be responsible for all such property, incl\.ldi.nq its care ani maintenance. '!he At:Jercy shall admit the County's property management officer to the At:Jercy's premises for the pw:pose of marking such property, as appropriate, with county property tags. '!he At:Jercy shall meet the following procedural requirements for all such property: I 1. Property records shall be maintained accurately cm:1 provide for: a description of the property; manufacturer's serial number or other identification number; acquisition date ani cost; source of the property; percentage of block grant funjs used in the purchase of property; cm:11ocation, use, ani condition o~ tile p;roperty. 2. A ];t1ysical inventory of property Shall be taken ani the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two (2) years to verify the existence, current utilization, ani continued need for the property. 3. A control system shall be in effect to insure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft to the property. Arr:i loss, damage, or theft of the property shall be investigated cm:1 fully documented. c. D. 4. Adequate maintenance procedures shall be inplanented to keep the property in gocx:i condition. 7. ACX:UISIT.ICN AND REIDCATICN A. Arr:i acquisition of real property for any activity assisted un:ler this Agreement which occurs on or after the date of the County's submission of its Block Grant application to HUD shall c:arrply with Title III of the Federal Unifonn Relocation Assistance ani Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the Unifonn Act) (40 use section 4601) cm:1 the Regulations at 24 em pt. 42. B. Arr:i displacement of persons, business, nonprofit organizations or fanns occurring on or after the date of the County's submission of its Block Grant application as the result of acquisition of real property assisted un:ler this Agreement shall c:arrp1y with Title II of the Unifonn Act ani the Regulations at 24 em pt. 42. '!he Aqercy shall c:arrply with the Regulations pertaining to costs of relocation ani written policies, as specified by 24 em section 570.606 (a) & (b). ... -11- o o 8. H:IS'laUC mESERVATICN '!he 1v:Jency shall meet the historic preservation requirements of Public law 89-665 ani the Archeological ani Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-291) ani Executive Order 11593, inc1uc1in;J the p:r:ocedl1res prescribed by the Advisory Ccuncil on Historic Preservation in the Regulations at 36 CFR pt. 800. Activities affectin] property listed in or fClllOO to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be subject to requirements set forth in HOD Environmental Review Procedures at 24 CFR pt. 58. 9. ~ B1\RRIERS I ~ facility constructed pursuant to this 1lgreem:mt shall cc:atply with design requirements of the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 use section 4151). 10. NCm'ARl'ICIPATICN IN R>IJ:TICAL ACl'IVI'l'IES '!he 1v:Jency shall CClll'ply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (5 USC Olapter 15). 11. NATIctW:. FIOOD INSlJRANCE '!he 1v:Jency may not receive Camnunity Developnent Block Grant fI.1niin; for acquisition or construction for use in arrj area that has been identified as havin] special floai hazards ani is not participatin;J in the National Floai Insurance Program, as provided by Section 3(a) of the Floai Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93- 234) ani the Regulations thereuIxier (24 CFR Ch. X, subchap. B). '!he Agency shall CClll'p1y with the Regulations at 24 CFR section 570.605. 12. AIR AND ~ POUDl'ICN '!he 1v:Jency shall CClll'ply with the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amerrled (42 usc section 1857 gg~) ani the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 use sections 1251 et ~) ani the regulations issued thereun:ler (40 CFR pt. 15). 13 . IEN>-Bl\SED PAIN!' R>:rsc::rmG '!he Agency shall CClll'ply with the HOD Lead-Based Paint Regulations (24 CFR pt. 35) isSJwQ pursuant to the lead-Based Paint Poi.sonin;J Prevention Act (42 use sections 4831 et~) requirin] prohibition of the use of lead-based paint (whenever funjs urxier this Agreement are used directly or iroirectly for construction, rehabilitation, or toodernization of residential structures) ; elimination of .inurediate lead-based paint hazaJ:ds in residential structures; ani notification of the hazards of lead-based paint poisoning to purchasers ani tenants of residential structures constructed prior to 1950. ... -12- o o 14. ~l'.l'J.\JI'ICN FUR IDCAL FUNDIN:; '!he Block Grant F\.1rdi.n; made available un:ier this ~ shall not be utilized by the kJen::y to reduce substantially the am:JUnt of lcx:al financial support for cxmm.mi.ty developnent activities below the level of such suwort prior to the availability of :funjs un:ier this ~...eeroent. 15. IUBLIC CHmRSHIP For kJencies which are not ltll.U'1i.cipal corporations organized un:ier the laws of the state of Minnesota, it may become necessary to grant the CoI.mty a property interest where the subject project calls for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or installation of publicly-owned facilities arxi inprovements. '!he kJen::y shall canp1y with current CoI.mty policy regarding transfer of a property interest sufficient to meet the public ownership requirement. 16. IUBLIC I:NFtRo1ATICN A. In all news :releases arxi other public notices :related to projects furxled un:ier this J\greement, the kJen::y shall include infonnation identifying the source of :funjs as the Anoka CoI.mty Ccmmmi.ty Developnent Block Grant Program. B. For all construction projects the kJen::y shall erect a sign to CoI.mty specifications at the construction site, identifying the source of :funjs, except that this requirement may be waived for construction projects of Ten 'Ihousani arxi 00/100 ($10,000.00) Dollars or less. PARr III. 1. E.VAIDATICN '!he kJen::y agrees to participate with the CoI.mty in any evaluation project or perfonnance report, as desi9ned by the CoI.mty or the appropriate Federal agen::y, arxi to make available all infonnation required by any such evaluation prcx::ess. 2. AIJD1TS AND Dc:>M!X:1'.1<KS '!he 1/;Jer'CY shall obtain an in:leperxlent audit on an annual basis if the budget is at least $25,000.00. SUch audit shall be made by qualified iniividuals who are sufficiently in:leperxlent of those who authorize the expeOOiture of Federal:funjs. '!he audit report shall state that the audit was performed in acx:ordance with the generally accepted governmental audit staJdards for financial arxi canpliance audits of the U. S. General Acc:cmIting Office stan:'Iards for Audit of Governmental oraanizations. Pr<.A.ILCU'lS. Activities. arxi Functions, arxi the provisions of a.m A-llO. . ... - 13 - o o '!he records an:! docurrents with respect to all matters covered by this contract shall be subject at all tiIIV3S to inspection, review or audit by the County, Federal or state officials so authorized by law during the performance of this contract ani during the period of retention specified in this Part III. 3. .l<&L1l<I.b As required by HOD Regulations, 24 em pt. 570, the hJercy shall c:::atpile an:! maintain the following records: A. Financial Management - SUch records shall identify adequately the source an:! application of fUn:1s for activities within this Agreement, in accordance with the previsions of Appen:iix G to the u.s. Office of Management an:! Budget Circular A-102 or A-110 as appropriate. 'lhese records shall contain infonnation pertaining to grant awards an:! authorizations, obligations, l.U1Obligated balances, assets, liabilities, outlays, an:! i.nc:ama. B. citizen Participation - Narrative an:! other documentation describing the process used to infom citizens conceming the alOOUl'lt of fUn:1s available, the ranges of project activities un::iertaken, an:! opportunities to participate in :fun:ied block grant projects. C. Relocation - Iniication of the overall status of the relocation workload an:! a separate relocation record for each person, business, organization, an:! fann operation displaced or in the relocation workload. D. Property Acquisition - NJercy files must contain (a) invitation to owner to ac:conpany appraiser during inspection, (b) at least one property appraisal, (c) statement of basis for determination of just CCIrpenSation, (d) written offer of just c::arrpensation, (e) all docl1lTll'>nts involving conveyance, (f) settlement cost reporting statement, an:! (g) notice to surrerrler posSession of premises. E. Equal Opportunity - '!he Agercy shall maintain racial, ethnic, an:! gemer data showing the extent to which these categories of persons have participated in, or benefitted from, the activities carried out UIXler this Agl:;eement. '!he Agercy shall also maintain data which records its affinnative action in equal opportunity employment, an:! its good-faith efforts to identify, train, aOO/or hire lower- income residents of the project area an:! to utilize business concerns which are located in or owned in substantial part by persons residi.rg in the area of the project. F. labor st.anjards - Records shall be maintained regard:in; c:::atplianc:e of all contractors perfonni.nq construction work UIXler this Agreement with the labor staroards made applicable by 24 em 570.603. G. SUch other records as may be required by the Co\mty aOO/or HOD. , - 14 - o 4. REl>>n'ICN OF REXI:eE Required records shall be retained for a period of three (3) years after teJ:mi.nation of this Agreeme1'1t, except as follows: (1) Records that are the subject of audit finiings shall be retained for three (3) years after such fintings have been resolved. (2) Records for nonexperx3able property shall be retained for three (3) years after its final disposition. Nonexperx1able property is defined in Appemix N to u.s. Office of Management am Budget circular No. A-102 or A-nO as appropriate. 5. ~:s I '!he Agercy shall submit such reports as required by the County on a m:mthly am annual basis am also prior to project execution. o ... - 15 - r<.,~,.I,:~ -, RJBLIC tDrICZ t7It:llm An::lka CDmty as 1988 PL' I' ~stat:IiIEnt of n--..u.ty Devel.~IL o ClJjectives an1 Pmjected tJse of l'\Jrds Pursuant to thrm1l"lity OI!Yel~at Block Grant regulatia'1S, Anoka O:ult:y has PJblished the following statement of ~. ~.)SEld use of 1988 Anoka O:ult:y a>B; funds. Citizens, ncn-p:ofit gJ:OJpS, m::I other interested persa'lS are invite:l to ~....em upal this statelllent and upc:n Anokis County I S performance of the aB:; ~"''''':I'''aw by CCI'1tact.ing Anoka 011:nty Adm.ini.st.ratiCl't, 325 East Main street, Anoka, telepxx,e rw1nlNo'P' 421-4760, AttentiCl't: JoAnn Wright. ~~C~ PCR 1988 AR:D crume t'!'A: PJlIo .:s)flII '!be follcwin; objectives have been established for assistin;J n"Wn""'Uties am citizen gJ:OJpS in the fot1llllati~ of. specific, ~...."...aw activities. '!be c:bjec:tives listed 1:lelcw, are in brief'. fom. A IICIt'e CXIIplete deve1~lt of ~""""'CWI policy and ratiCl'tale iIay J::le fainr::l by CCI'1tact.ing the above mentiCl'teCl source. 1. suw.....t deoent, safe housin; for residents in Anoka CQ.mt:y through: (1) rehabilitatiCl't of exi.stinq structures; (2) eligible assistance for CXX1St:ructiCl't of new lower ino::me housin;; (3) acquisitiCl't of hcusiIq suitable to meet lower i.J~ needs. 2. Assist ~"":I"'aw efforts to redeve1cp blighted areas thrcu3h: acx;tUi.sition and clearance, upgradinq public facilities am utilities, enccuragiIq new developllellt, seeJcin;J local financial cx:mni.tment to the effort. 3. Develcp an::! ~..dt: public facilities ani utilities which serve prilllarily lower incaDe persalS or whien are an integral part of redeve1~ efforts in blighted areas. 4. Pl..........--te and SU{.tIOrt eoax:mic deve1~lt in AnoJca 011:nty to prcvide new j d::lS. 5. ~......Jte the r&II:M!ll of an:hi.t:ect:uIa1 barriers. 6. Provide f\mdin;J for public service activities whien S8%Ve primarily lower incaDe. persalS. '!be above objectives were developed in aocperatiCl't with the CCIIIlImi.ties in Anoka 011:nty an::! are based CI't need as illustrate:l by statistics drawn fran the 1980 census data ani ~Ftts frail t'Y'mW'nI1I"lity residents. OVerall, they are a CCIltinJatiCl't of the 1981-1987 a:a; pr...."...CIIID, with many ~nti.ties sustain.ing efforts begIm in these years. o ... o *<B1. 1m' aID 6 o I 5 I 4 I 2 I 1 I 5 I 6 I 1988 ~ JHD aDfl"l CI:IC IKGRM PRES!Nl!:D ItR RlBLIC HI!'ARDG AmIL 12, 1988 1K\1 ~ ~ Tl'1'IE' '~.u(ll AMnn' AX 805 Anc1ca PUblic Smvioes Grants to the followin; plblic service agencies/p.L"":!.L_: NrAP Senior ~, Family Life Mental Health center, Alexandra House, North SU1::J111"hIl1'\ CbmSeling center, Northwest SUbJ%ban Xi.nshi.p, Central Center for Family Rescm'oes. 806 City Hall Aoo-"ibility For han:ti~ lift-Anoka City Hall ba...-.,t floor. 14,000.00 $19,400.00 AI< AI< 802 EcalaDi.c Devel~ PlaJ'll1iJq Persalnel CXlSts to cx:ntirua planni.n; to iJIprave ~laIIic devel~&t in the City of AnJka. 804 Anc1ca n--1"Cial Rehab A grant or loan pI~CIIII to iDprcM! qualifying CCIIIIII!rCial properties in the City, specific sites IX7t yet c:hcs1ln. 40,000.00 6,400.00 AI< ---4 AI< 801 Anoka Ho.1Sing Rehab Rehabilitation of owner-occupied housing-health, safety am code iJxpravEments city-wide. 32,279.00 - 803 SoreI'lSa\ Park ~"ibility ~ovenent of restrocm facilities in SorenSa1 Park at Park and state SL.......ts to allClii for han:ti'""'w-'I a('''~ "ibility. J1Ie',". 818 Blaine Public Services Grants to the followin; plblic service agencies: Family Life Center Fourmtia'\, North SlJbI11"hIl1'\ Family Service center, center for Family RescurCeS, Alexamra Hoose, Northwest SUl::mt:lan Kinship, Associatia'\ for Retarded Citizens. AI< 17,000.00 28,150.00 ... Page 2. r:J o I 4 6 5 4 2 4 6 I BL 816 Blaine F.ocn:mic Cevelqment Activities by the Blaine Anoka Development COIIIpllny to promote il!lOOllalli.c deYel~ .in the City- inclur1irq tlUt net limited to loans to privatel:lus:ir--~ . (]{ 809 Ecxn:IIdc Cevel~tt Pk........Jt.iat MaIiceti.ng of in:1ustrial ard cxmnercial redevelopment sites in Col\lli)ia Heights. (]{ 808 OJl\Jllbia Heights Public Services Grants to public &e%Vice agencies including but not limited to: Chzysalis, NrAP Senior 0It:read1, Alexandra House, Associatiat for Retarded Citizens, Cent:.1:al Center for Family Resources, Frierm of the Li.brary, Little Voyageur's Ma1tessori SChool, Columbia Heights Senior Educa.tiat. l"'nmt11l'ti.ty united Methcdist 0n1rc:h Grief O:JUnselilg. (]{ 811 Parkview J--"i.bility ~ibility iJIprcYements to a unit in ParXview villa public hcusilg at 965 40th Avenue N.E., COlumbia Heights. (]{ 810 In:iustrial Plannin; Preparation of an industrial revih1 j ,...atiat plan for the in1ustrial area in OJl\Jlli)ia Hei~. (]{ 807 Neighborllocxl Revitalizatiat Aa,tUisitiat of uninhabitable sinJle- family residential properties as available thrcu;Jba1t OJl\Jllbia Heights. CR 822 Oxr\ Rapids Eca1aDic Cevel..........,nt . Activities to promote economic deYel~ .in the City of Oxr\ Rapids inclur1irq tlUt net limited to lOi!lIW to private in::!ustry. CR 823 I<.inship Grant to Northwest Kinship for services to law .incaIe silgle parent families thrcu;Jba1t Oxr\ Rapids. 3,400.00 77,344.00 10,000.00 I 20,000.00 I 10,000.00 I 5,000.00 I 88,819.00 I 116,170.00 I ... 6 o o Page 3. I 6 I 2 I 2 I 2 II ... 4 1 II 6 II at 878 Alexandra House Grant to Alexan:b:a Hcuse to provide llerVices to battered wcmen and their children. !R 833 Fric:Uey PUblic SeIvices Grants to public service agerx::ies to be selected by the Fridley City O::iUncil, with re(' -..._1 ),jatia'l by the IlJman Resc::m-ces n--; -ia'l. 4,600.00 31,397.00 !R 830 RiV8%View Heights 0X1tinJecl ~itia'l of prqlerty in the Mississippi River floocl plain sa.tth of 79th Way and any r--"uy relocatia'l of residents. 66,959.00 !R 828 Fric:Uey omaercial Rehabilitatia'l I.oim ~~CIIID to provide 2' era; loans as a JlBtc:n. to private financing to ~calt: . '" ....-Y-Cial i'I-~_. 'lbe activity will take ~l~c~ in RedeYel~ Districts or a'l a spot basis t:hrc::u;hcut the City it eligible urder era; rules. 846 AOOaYer NeighJ:lomcocl Revitalization Cit:y-wide iA~- to """"J';.... and to remove blightea property, with resultin; vacant prqlel't:y to be sold for aA:u~iate use. 6,302.00 AN 34,563.00 II 868 Fast Bethel Eoonanic CeYel~tt Eoc:.n:IIiic am ~'r"Cial activities dsvel~1t ilx::l.1.ding but net limited to ~';lZitia'l, public i.DprcM!ment:s, and loans to private business. 'Ihe specific site (sites) to be cb:1i'e!1 at a later date. 871 Ham take lb.1sing Rehabilitatia'l Cit:y-wide rehabilitatia'l of owner- occ:upied residential prcpert:y. 841 Line takes Senior OXlrdinatar staffing of a senior recreatia'l ~~_ located in the City Hall a'l Highway 14. 3,500.00 EB 34,883.00 HI. 23,972.00 LL ... o o Page 4. 6 II 4 II 6 II 6 II 1 II 6 II 1 II 4 u. 878 Alexandra HaJse Grant to Alexandra HaJse to p:ovi.de services to battered wcmen and their children. 2,500.00 U. 842 Line Iakes Eccnanic Devel~tt Economic Development Activities including but not limited to assistance to private business wherever ~~iate in the City. ~ 860 Ramsey senior 'l'ransportatioo Prcvisioo of transportatioo for senior citizens in the City, with consideration of contract-for- sern.ces with a private p:ovi.der. 17,497.63 24,007.00 SP 882 Ano1ca RetaJ:ded Citizens Grant to the Anc1ca O::lunty ~sociati.oo for Aetarded Citizens for a toy lending libra%y and "~in" C81ter at lloo-9Oth Averua H.E., Bl~. SP 845 H:i:lile Hc:IIIe Oooperative Grant to SpriD} IaJce 'l9rrace ML:i)ile Hc:IIIe Park CcJrperative for partial CXlSt of <V'Y1,;aitioo of the property 00 wen the c:w.._tl. J:8Siaent's haDes are - located (lDt 12, SUbclivisioo 152 and Lots 16 through 28, Block 1, Warren Aatitioo, also lcncwn as Pleasantview H:i:lile Hc:IIIe Park). SP 844 Central Center Grant to Q,.uL.cal Center for Family Resc:m'oes for q:eratiDJ and lIICNi.n;J costs, c:w......1l locatioo at 1301-8lst AvenJe H.E., Spring lake Park. SP 843 Iaa:tie lake lbJsing Grant to Anc1ca ccunty lhmII"'lity Actioo P1.~..... for tenant relocatiat and project startup costs for the Ialtiie . IaJce Matel CD1Y8rSioo to low incaDe hausing. 'lhe property is located 00 Highway 10 west of Central Aveme. 2,000.00 9,500.00 7,016.00 5,500.00 852 anns Eccn::mi.c Devel~&l. Economic development activities includin; but net limited to loans to private businesses wherever aw...~iate in the township. ... III ED 38,405.00 III cr 866 Hel!ldstart an:! Senior O:lordinator ~ PUblic sexvioe act.ivitis of -.ni.or r-.e6tion an:! Headstart ~-.bool .~ lA~auming at unity I1ltheran Ch1rd1, I.aJce Drive an:! CDmty Highway 19 in Q)11JllbJs Tcwnship. rJ BE 849 Bethel City Park IlIprcvements to Bethel Chrm"lity Park at Dewey street and 237th Aveme including :installatia'\ of a pavilia'\, ball field, hcc:key rink, llIell am sane rencvatia'\ of an exi.st.ing l::lui.lding. 835 Oenterville ~ehellsive Plan Plannin;J to ao:. -...- -date and direct increased growth within the City. Page 5. 06 3 rJ CE llllti- III/rJ 4 co 1 co PIlADCO 38,000.00 13,179.00 10,605.00 EccnaDic Oevel~-IDan PIlyments !Dan payments receiV8cl tJy all ~wU.tis with !1.A.a....J.c DeYel...........L !Dan l&~-, O""l....tly retumin;J to revolvin;J loan lo'L~- for additialal lOi!lJ'llS. 206,958.00 ~Areas III and rJ 10,984.00 1,080,289.63 ---- 877 Coonty Eca1aIIi.c Devel~.t Reserved for activities to ~......,te ~.:lwi.c devel~.t in the Camty, including but net limited to plannin;J, puDlic improvements and direct assistance to private bJsiness. 879 Coonty HoJsing' Rehabilitatia'\ county-wi.de l:ebabilitatia'\ of low income owner-occupied residential , prcpert:y. 60,654.00 161,744.00 876 Coonty a~CIlIl Administration 99,270.37 $1,401,958.00 1988 P.LWYS-CIID Total O:&t o ... Page 6. o so~ of .....inrY 'n:ltal IIJD 1988 B ""gPt EstiJIlated P.L~Q&1i Ir-..- Total Percentage of Benefit to I.cwer Inxme Persa'1s or IbJseholds: 8~ Percentage of Plannin;J an:! Admin: 14' Percentaqe of Public service Activities: 13' *'Ihese 1"Il~""'S refererxle the narrative at Specific Cbjectives for the 1988 <:DB:; Pro;ram at page 1. $1,195,000.00 206,958.00 $1,401,958.00 . o ... /. '(',I,. (B(l".ll"J.tD JDr.ICIf C.D.B.G. Items: 1. Ccmni.ssioner Haas steffen stated that the County of Anoka an:i the City of Anoka HcAJsing ~evelcpnent Authority (liRA) will be drawing for Anoka County Hanestead Pl.'"'::jLalU properties located at 730 F're1oont an:i 508 Van aJren in the City of Anoka fran anDl'lC] qualified haJseholds who will sign an ag1=uent to make the necessary repairs to the prc:perty an:i who do not currently own real estate. Camdssioner Haas steffen introduced JoAnn Wright, .County CcmmJni.ty Develcpnent Manager; Merlyn Hunt, Anoka liRA; Anoka Mayor Steve Halsey; an:i Anoka CamciJll'lember Jcim Mann. 'n1e BRA an:! City officials drew the names of ten awlicants for the Uman Hanestead prc:perty. '!he awlicants are prioritized in the order drawn, an:i the first two names drawn will be processed for ownership of the properties deperxient on the ability to obtain financing for repairs. '!he subsequent names drawn will be considered in the order drawn, shculd the first-chosen awlicants not qualify for financing. (List of awlicants drawn is on file in the County Administration Office.) 2. a:mni.ssioner amnan made lOOtion authorizing the Cat1m.mity Developnent Manager to sul:mi.t 1988 Ccm1Imi.ty Develcpnent Block Grant Ai:Plication to HOD. (Ai:Plication is on file in the County 1ldmi.ni.stration Office.) a:mni.ssioner Ian;feld seoorD:d the lIPti.on. canmi.ssioners Haas steffen, amnan, Ian;feld, Korctiak, cenaiko, M::Carron an:! Erhart voted ''Yes. II Motion carried. . 3 . Camdssioner Kordiak made lOOtion authorizing transfer of $8,181. 51 from the budget for Fridley O:mnercial Rehabilitation Project #728 to Riverview Heights Project #730, per City of Fridley request. ccmn.issioner Haas steffen secorxied the lOOtion. Upon roll call vote, ccmn.issioners Haas steffen, l3uJ::man, Ian;Jfeld, Kordiak, Cenaiko, M=Carrcn an:i Erhart voted ''Yes. II Motion carried. . state of Minnesota ) SS cmnty of Ano1ca ) I, Jcim "Jay" McLirden, County Mninistrator, Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have ~red the foregoing c:opy of the Motion of the County Eoard of said County with the original record thereof on file in the Mministration Office, Anoka County, Minnesota, as stated in the minutes of the p~i ~ of said Board at .a meeting duly held on May 17, 1988, an:i that the same is a true an:! correct c:opy of said original record an:! of the whole thereof, an:! that said Motion was duly passed by said Board at said meeting. witness ~ han:i an:! seal this 18th day of May, 1988. I , {J/ li:!!t! ~~ Ji II,]' " _ County ., tor o .. . . . o .., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS E 1(H.Il3/T,:JE. Anoka County, Minnesota DATE AD,;I 23.1985 RESOLUTION NO, 85-42 -. , . OFFERED BY COMMISSIONER Langfeld COl.fI4TY BOARD POLICY - COMMlNTY OEYELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM INCOME AMEt<<)JNG RESOLUTIONS 81-107 AN:l82-53 Wl-EREAS, Title I of the Housing and Comm,",ity Development Act of "74 'as CI'Tlended provides for a program of Community Development Bloc:k Grants; and, Wl-EREAS, the Anolca County Board of Commissioners has been desig10ted as an "Urban COWIty" by the F'ederal Housing and Urban Development Department and consequently i. eligible to participate in the Notional Comm,",ity Development Bloc:lc Grant Programl and, , Wl-EREAS, the Anolea COI.OIty Bocrd of Commissioners has directed the preparation of a pion under the Comm,",ity Developmlnt Bloc:Ic Grant Program In c:onc:ert with the lIUIicipalities of Anolca COWItYl and, Wl-EREAS, as a portion of said pion, lTlI.I'licipalities as the I<b-9ran- of Community Development Bloc:Ic Grant f,",cIs may utilize said f,",elI in _1_ program fonns to benefit 1_ and moderate' inc:ome persons, to aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight or to meet other c:omm,",ity ~Iopment needI having a partlc:uler urgency bee_ of threat to health and safety; and, 'Wl-EREAS, "Program income" __ grass inc:ome earned by tM ab-grant.. from the grant I\4)parted activity such all prac:eecls from the sale of real ar penanal property, interest earned on escrow CICCOIIItS, revolving rehallilitation ac:c&MIt. or lump sum ,...i1itatlon accounts, inc:ome fram ..vice fees, sale of ~tl.. usage or r....al f..,1oan prac:eeds ..-om rehabilitation or econcmlc: development Iacn, and interest earnecI an nrvolvlng Iaans and prac:eeds fram special <In,,,,--.nt. levied ta recover the caat of c:oNtruc:ting a public worics or fac:llity ta the extent that IUCh ClIIt _ initially paid with the CorIVIUlity Development BIoc:Ic Grant f\.nds! and, Wl-EREAS, In ac:cordanc:e with F' ederal regulati..... Anolca COl.OIty as the Commlftity Develapnwnt Bloc:lc Grant recipient ....t rec:eiw all program Income. The ~.... may use said f...... for ~ eligible COIIlIIU\ity Developnwlt BIoc:Ic Grant ac:tlvlty and the County ....t expend revenues gBneratecl by program inc:ame bef<w. furttMr chwdo_ ~ts will be authorized! and, 'MEREAS,' payment. af Interest and principal due on economic: .""I..j)o...,,, Iomls to private Inci.lstry, whic:h ere made ta a rlMllvlng loan ac:c:oNIt whic:h - approved 01 a CoO.G.B. grant to G Stat_tifled Iac:al development corpDrGtion ere not c:a,.identd by HU) to be "Program Inc:ome"z NOW, ll€REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the AnoIca County Bocrd of CammissiOlW'S does hereby ..tallish 01 a matter of paliey thatl I) All Inc:ame fram CD8C-funcIed ac:tivltl.. whic:h meet. the abow cWlnition of prognm Inc:ame, IhaII be promptly forwarded ta Analca COWIty. 2) Eac:I\ LOC whic:h has a CDBC revolving loan ac:cc<.nt for ec:onamlc: ...Iopment will retain Iam\ r~ of. within the ac:ClIU'\t for CDntiNOed .... for . '. d_lapment and that the COl.OIty or the city will_ute an ogr~ LDC which will inc:ludeI a) Prchlbition of c:onf&c:t of interest 01 prCllllided In ....., Regulatlor. ".....r R Pert S7D.611. b) CC'lplianc:e with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1'6Il. c) Req 'Irement for the LOC to .......it qucrMrly reports to the AnoIca C.....ty Com. ,,",ity Development Director regorcllng the, .... and rewtt. of expenditl.ft of fundi fram the revolving loan CICCOIIIt for., long as AnoIca COl.OIty remai,. an entitlement c:aunty. cO Any ather provisiON r~INd by Stat. or Federal law or regulation. ... - . ~. .~oMIi. , ,/ RESOLUTION '8>42 (Continued) Poge 2 o 3) Anolca County will establish as of May I. 1985. a revolving 'aan acc:ovnt for deposit of all economic development loan payments received by Anolca County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, all program income received by Analca C.......ty from activities f......d in total or part from a municipality's CDBC project will increase that community's budget far eligible coec activities and shall thel'l!fal'l! be available to the community for fut....e expendit....e pursuant to the Jaint Cooperation Agreement in effect at the time of expenditure. District II - HaaI District '2 - Burman District '3 - Langfeld District '4 - Kordiolc District '5 - Cenalko District" - McCcrran District 17 - Erhcrt VB X X X X X X X NO Haa& Burman Langfeld Kordialc Cenaiko McCcrron Erhcrt State of MI~ta ) 55 COW'Ity of Anolca ) I. JaM "Jay" McLInden, County A<ministrator, Anolca C.....ty. Minneslla, hereby certify that I haw cornpcred the fcregoing capy of the r_urlon of the County Boord of sold C.....ty with the originof reconI thereof on file in the A<minlstration Office, Anolco County. Mi_to, os stated In the minutes of the proceedings of laid Boord at o meeting duly held on April 23, 1'8S, and that the _ Is 0 true and correct copy 01 sold original record and of the whole thlIreof. and that MIld r_lutian _ cIuIy pcaed by said Bocrd at IOid meeting. Witness my hand and seal this 23rd cfoy of April. 1985- th;~'l- ~ ADMINISTRATOR o , ~~___.___.'-u.....,_~..6."';_"''''~-''-_'''.'''''_'''--' / o o .~ .. -~,---'"....... il .V"KU , ~gUNTY COMMISSIO~ERS Anoka County, Minnesota E)(i-//~!T,J February 21,1985 RESOLUTION NO, 85-23 DATE OFFERED BY COMMISSIONER Langfeld TIMEt. Y EXPE/I[)lTlR OF C.O.e.G. F\.N)$ Wl-EREAS, Analca County is an Entitlement County and therefare receives ornJQl Community Development Black Grant (cceG) allocations fram the U.S. Oepcrtment of Hausing and Urban Development; and, Wl-EREAS, the Anaka County Boord of Commissioners makes these ccec funelf available to municipalities in Analca County far eligible projects; and, Wl-EREAS, Anaka County, 01 the grantee, is responsible for the timelv expenditure of cceG funds; and, Wl-EREAS, Analca County's perfarmance is measured in part by ..ch timely performance; and, I Wl-EREAS, Analca County may be uject to HUO fiscallOncti~ for failure to expend coeG fl.f\ds within a reasonable period of time: NOW, TI-EREFORE, BE IT RESOlVED that the Analco County Boord of Commissioners adopts the following Policy Regarding Schedule for Expenditure af Community Development Blaclc Crant Funds by Anaka c-.ty 5<.Dgrantees: POLICY REGARDING SCl-EDU..E FOR EXPENDITlR OF COMMLJIlITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FlN)S BY'ANOI<A COlHTY SLSCRANTEES Community Development- Blaclc Grant FI.f\ds will be reserved for eligible budgeted ugrontee activities for up to 18 months after notice of availability of aICh funds for expenditure. If a earnmunity fails to expend coec project funds within that time limit, the Anako County Boord of Commissioners will witheraw the allocation for that project. In order that communities may have adequate notice of the i"..,ending withcrawal, County cceG stoff will notify these earnmuniti.. which have not conmitted coec project funds within 12 months after the start of the applicable COBG program yecr of that canditian. Such notice will enable these c:arnmunities to r_luate projects and to program the funds if necesay. Those communities which cre In violation of the 18 month rule at the time of adoption of this policy will be giYen six months from the date of the County Board Resolution referencing this palicy, to expend their coec project funds. At the end of the six month period, the funds will be uject to W;ithdrawaL The Analco County Boord may on an individual case basis, elect to waive the 18 month rule If the Boord should determine that the project delay is cauaed by forces outside the control of the community and that project CGn1>letion is fe..ible within 0 r~le amount of time. Funds which r_t to Analco County mil be reallocated at the discretion of the County Board to either other projects llAlmitted by earnmunities or to Caunty-wide activities. Arty community based groups or other ugrontees of communities must be notified of this policy when they cre considered for COBG funding. ... ';~-';"'~';"'-"---'-' : , '. " ~I RESOLUTION 1'85-23 (Continued) o Dist,ictll . H'Jas District '2 . Burman District '3 . Langfeld District '4 . Kordiak Dist,ict '5 . Cenaiko Dis trict '6 . McCarron District 17 . Emert YES X X X X X X X NO Haas Burman Langfeld Kordiak Cenaiko McCarron Emert State of Minnesota ) SS County of Anaka ) I, Jchn "Jay" McLinden, County Administrator, Anakp County, Minnesota, hereby certi fy that I hove CClfTllered the foregoing copy of the resolution of the County Board of said County with the original record thereof on file in the Administration Office, Anoka County, Mimesota, as stated in the mi~tes of the prOCeedings of said Boord at a meeting duly held on February 21, "85, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original record and of the whole thereof, and that soid resolution was duly passed by said Bocrd at said meeting. , Witrlas my hand and seal this 21st day of February, I!/lIS. ~t1.-~-.L ~NISTRATOR o _.i ~ .a. . .....u.....-:.:.-____...__'....-. , , o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, -. . ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DATE 21 June 1988 ITEM NO. Ordinance 11 Amendment BY: zoning Administrator d'Arcy BosellJ~~ The city Council is requested to adopt the proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 11 as proposed. In setting the Council Agenda for the last meeting and trying to apply the guidelines of Ordinance 11 to such items as Rezonings, Special Use Permits and plats, those time lines pose,a conflict with the time lines set out by State Statute and our Ordinan~es No.8 and 10. At the recommendation of the City Attorney, William Hawkins, the proposed amendment comes to you for adoption. COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY MOTION BY TO '. o o CITY OF ANDIVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 11D AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION and SETTING OUT THE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER: The following subsection shall be amended: Section 3. Regular Meetings. The Commission shall hold at least two (2) regular meetings on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. The Commission shall hold as many additional meetings per month as the City Councilor Commission shall deem necessary. (Paragraph break added for clad ty) . It shall adopt rules for the transactions of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings; said record shall be a public record. (Paragraph break added for clarity) , Exce t where different time re uirements are s ecified in Andover C1ty Or 1nances, t e agen a 1tems rom t e P ann1ng & Zon1ng Commission meeting held on the second Tuesday, shall be scheduled .for the city Council on their first Tuesday meeting of the following month; and the items from the Planning & zoning Commission meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be scheduled for the City Council on their third Tuesday meeting of the following month. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1988. Jerry Windschitl, Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk --...----....----.------. DRAFT CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o ORDINANCE NO. 11 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND SETTING OUT THE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF. The Andover City Council does ordain: SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMISSION. A City Planning and zoning Commission for the City of Andover is hereby established. SUBDIVISION 1. COMPOSITION. The Planning and zoning Commission sh~ll consist of seven members. The members shall be appointed by the City Council and may be removed at any time by a majority vote of the City Council. The city attorney, engineer, planner and building inspector shall attend meetings of the Planning and zoning Commission in an advisory capacity at the request of the chairman. . SUBDIVISION 2. TERMS OF OFFICE. Of the members of the Commission first appointed, three shall be appointed for a term of one year, two for a term of two years and two' for a term of three years. Terms shall expire on January 1. Original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until their successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies during a term shall be filled by the Gity Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Every appointed member shall, before entering upon the discharge of his duties, take an oath that he will faithfully discharge the duties of his office. All members shall serve with such compensation as may be set from time to time by resolution of the City Council. (2~4-75) SUBDIVISION 3. ABSENCES. Three consecutive unexcused absences of a member from duly called Commission meetings shall constitute automatic resignation from office. Determination that an absence is unexcused shall be in the discretion of the Commission Chairman. (4-18-78) SECTION 2. ORGANIZATION MEETINGS, ETC. The City Council shall appoint a chairman from among the appointed members for a term of one year; the Commission may create and fill such other offices as it may deem necessary for its own administration. The Commission Chairman or his designated representative shall attend all regular City Council meetings. SECTION 3. REGULAR MEETINGS. o The Commission shall hold at least two (2) regular meetings on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. The Commission shall hold as many additional meetings per month as the City Councilor Commission shall deem necessary. o o DRAFT It Shall adopt rules for the transactions of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings; said record shall be a public record. SECTION 4. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION. The Planning Commission shall be the City Planning Agency and shall have the powers and duties given such agency generally by Laws of Minnesota 1965, Chapter 670. It shall also exercise the duties conferred upon it by this ordinance. SECTION 5. PLATTING AND ZONING. The Planning And Zoning Commission shall carry out such . functions and duties as are assigned to it under the provisions of the City of Andover Ordinance No. 8 relating to zoning and No. 10 relating to p1attin~. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication as provided by law. passed by the Andover City Council this 11th day of April, 1972. CITY OF ANDOVER RICHARD SCHNEIDER Chairman ATTEST: MARY WEST Clerk Page 2 o toward a river, stream or lake and within 300 feet shall require a special permit issued by city of Andover. (D) Subdivision -~ 1. Land suitability: No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable for the proposed use by city of Andover because of flooding, inadequate drainage, soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewage disposal capabilities or any other feature likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of the future_residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. I 2. All plats in shoreland areas shall be submitted to and reviewed by the State Division of Waters and Soils and Minerals before final action by city of Andover. . (E) Issuance of a Building Permit Issuance of a building permit for a property having frontage on a river, stream or lake or in an area subject to flooding shall be subject to the following: 1. Before a building permit shall be issued for a building, structure, or construction grading, the applicant shall provide: an executed application form for building permit; all plans; exhibits; and certification required by the ordinance. 2. The applicant shall be required to furnish a certification from a registered professional engineer or registered surveyor that the elevation of the structure and the site meet all requirements of this section and the zoning ordinance. 4.34 zoning Coordination Any zoning district change on land adjacent to or across a public right-of-way from an adjoining community shall be referred to the adjacent community for review and comment . prior to action by the governing body granting or denying the zoning district classification change. A period of at least thirty (30) days shall be provided for receipt of comments: such comments sh~11 be considered as advisory only. (10-17-78) SECTION 5. ADMINISTRATION 5.01 Amendments 0- In accordance with the provisions of Minnesota statutes, the governing body may, from time to time, adopt amendments. Amendments may be initiated to the text by the city Council, planning Commission, property owner, or resident. All proposed amendments shall be referred to adoption. The planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment. 5.02 Rezonings page 33 ,0 I ,~' cr . ......".. The procedure for changing zoning district boundaries (rezoning) shall be as follows: (A) The Planning Commission, the City Council, or person may initiate a rezoning. Persons wishing to initiate a rezoning of property shall fill out a "zoning Form". The zoning form shall be accompanied by a fee of $100.00 to be used for the costs of processing the application. The zoning form shall be filed with the City Clerk. An additional $50.00 fee may be required for each meeting in excess of two which is necessary because of incomplete information or changes in the application. (5-20-80) (B) property owners and occup~nts within 350 feet of the property in question shall be notified in writing, although failure by any property owner or occupant to receive such applicant shall submit a list of the property owners and occupants within 350 feet as part of the application. When a rezoning involves changes in district boundaries affecting an area of 5 acres or less, a similar notice shall be mailed at least 10 days before the day of the hearing to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the rezoning relates. For the purposes of giving mailed notice, the person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by such person and shall be made a part of the record of the proceedings. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the notice, shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to comply with this section has been made. (5-20-80) (C) A public hearing on the rezoning application shall be held by the planning Commission at its first regular meeting, allowing for publication, after the rezoning request has been received. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the city 10 days prior to the day of the hearing. ( 5-20-80) iJ=J"'.~Y.;~. ,~.~#ri.~\itt~~l'~~~'~~i.. 'b ;~m~~:~'." ~~~ € ~,~:~~'.~..~ii:~~J'~,~.~':,~~,~ ~,~~:~~,~~~ ~Counc1l'1-'following the :,dateof the hearing -1 Sucn heanng may 'be'''continued'' from time" to time in the event the planning Commission needs additional information, from the applicant or other sources to make its decision. '.li;The,\Pl.anning,<;ommtssi9nf ':;;,~sl1al,l;;tak:e'"act i on onr,t,he,. appJ,,i ca t i.on~'t;,~:tfitn'~6 o:~c,\aY"SJkf,~!Omtt:€;,ft; 'I1"".~>/.i:Y.,\U.!-I'f.""t:'1il!l,,,w'-.""i---i':-"l.f,v~i{"b'l'i . Ii""'- i"'''''''''.'.'''''1-."'''''.'''''' -,.....-------..t ' '. "'.i' ''-ua'\,;e;, '0' ~~.' " e'-"or 9 nal"u . , 'c: ear ng-l'"uness' an;;;ex enS10n,s tZ9;rfarit:'e'd~})Y0~the"'appn~aht. '.' " '''('5"'''-20'''80) ,A,.,.,-', -- ,.' ' _ _ ,. ,~""",-",_,"'"J.,..,.",._.. .. "..." _..._...~...i>...'. :l .( E) .~;,T.he""Ci ty" CIJ~..mci1~~ mu,st;,<take;,l2ac:"~ipq,,On.:~~h~:,\,app~t~,a,,~,i~h \wii:h18, 60;'aays''''fo11:owingre'ferral . by the"plann1ng; Comm1ssion;1 ;Th~"person'making the application shall be notified of the action taken. Such action may consist of approval, denial, or referral back to the Planning Commission. If the item i.s page 34 o r-- O' .t:. " referred back to the Planning Commission, it must reviewed and returned to the City Council within 30 days. (5-20-80) (F) wholly or year from No application for rezoning which has been denied in part shall be resubmitted for a period of one (1) the date of said order of denial. 5.03 Special (Conditional) Uses General statement (A) Special Use Permits may be granted or denied in any districts by action of the City Council. The Andover City Clerk shall maintain a record of all special use permits issued including information on the use, location, conditions imposed by the City Council, time limits, review dates, and such other information as may be appropriate. A copy of the special use permit shall also be filed with the building inspector. Any change involving structural alteration, enlargement, intensification of use, or similar change not spec~fically permitted by the special use permit shall require an amended special use permit and all procedures shall apply asif a new permit were being issued. All uses existing at the time of adoption of this ordinance and automatically granted a special use permit, shall be considere~ as having a special use permit which contains conditions which permits the land use and structures as they existed on said date and any enlargements, structural alteration, or intensification of use shall require an amended special use permit as provided for above. Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular zoning district, may, under some circumstances be suitable. when such circumstances exist, a special use permit may be granted. Conditions may be applied to issuance of the permit and a periodic review of the permit may be required. The permit shall be granted for that particular person or firm. The cancellation of a special use permit shall be considered administratively equivalent to a rezoning and the same requirements and procedures shall apply. (B) Criteria For Granting Special Use Permits In granting a special use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the planning Commission and th~ effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare.of occupants of surroundlands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, and the effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive plan. If it shall determine by resolution that. the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the community nor will cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and that said use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan the City Council may grant such permits. Page 35 (7-6-82) (C) procedure "0 (1) The person applying for a special use permit shall fill out and submit to the Clerk a "Zoning Form" together with a fee of $100.00. An additional fee of $50.00 may be required for each meeting in excess of two, which .is necessary because of incomplete information or changes in the petition. (2) The clerk shall refer the application to the Planning Commission property owners and occupants within 350 feet of the property in question shall be notified at least (7) days prior to the Plqnning Commission meeting, although failure of any property owners or occupants to review such notification shall not invalidate the proceedings. Notification shall be by mail. The petitioner shall be required to submit a list of the property owners and occupants within 350 feet as part of the peti tion. (2-14-75) (3) The Planning Commission shall consider the petition at its next regular meeting, but not earlier than seven (7) days from date of submission to the Planning Commission. r (4) The petitioner or his representative shall appear before the Planning Commission in order to answer questions concerning the proposed special use. ,."".,,,,< 5 ),,:~~heJ<repor,t4 of,;the:;,Plarin~cri9~~i;~ommi ~!~'~~n~~s~iqJ~,~e! '~placeQ':on : the agenda of '. the"Ci tYi.CoUnCU;a~:h\Jts',:,~nextlJ.il ~F!(9);#!~~~~'ti ng .'.foll owiii'g 'ref ai i~l',:~f ro'm" 'thf/ipla~ni n'g"":'F ~:;coll\miss'ronl'but not later than 90 days after the , ""ap'pli'cant has submitted the application. , (6) " iiIThe:City;,councn:"must,~:take;~.-actiori:!:i:1)ri~:th~,' iapPIJ'Cad,jo!ti'~~fth r~C6 0 d ''is a f t~r '.... ie~'e i'vfn ~~tn~~';'ie.l1W~i t~r'o f.l t.;the1,.'lanO'ihg Commission 1 'If it grants th~''"'special "ti's/a" . ll\i'petti'ri't";'"'the' Ci ty Council may impose conditions (including time limits) it considers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare, and such conditions may include a time limit for the use to exist or operate. I -, (7) An amended special use permit application shall be administered in a manner similar to that required for a new special use permit except that the fee shall be twenty-five dollars ($25.00): amended special use permits shall include re-applications for permits that have been denied, requests for changes in conditions, and as otherwise described in this ordinance. 0(' (8) No application for a special use permit shall be resubmitted for a period of one (1) year from the date of said order of denial. (9) When a special use may be of genetal interest to the Community or more than the adjoining owners, the Planning Commission may hold a public hearing and the page 37 : ,~~:. .;. Ordinance 10 \l~ br'v /' rD ./ .----- tl; , or-' ; !i',:;....\.' 'I '. .' No.8, Section 5.03 - 6.01 special use permit shall be reviewed with notice of said hearing published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 5.04 Variances and Appeals Where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this ordinance, an appeal may be made and a variance granted. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property owner. The procedure for granting variances is as follows: (1) A person desiring a variance shall fill out and submit to the City Clerk a "zoQing Form" together with a fee of $25.00, if the variance request involves single- family residential. All other requests shall have a fee of $50.00. (2) The application shall be referred to the Planning Commission which shall submit a report to the Ci ty counci l. (3) The petitioner shall appear before the Planning Commission in order to answer questions. (4) The City Council may grant the variance if it finds that a hardship has been created by the shape or condition of the parcel in question: granting the variance is necessary to the reasonable use of the land and granting the variance will not adversely affect the existing or potential use of adjacent land. (5) The petitioner, if appealing an interpretation of this ordinance by an employee of the City shall not be subject to the required fee. 5.05 Application Fees Application fees for rezoning, special use permits, variances, and appeals, as set out in Section 5.02 (A), Section 5.03 (C) (1), and Section 5.04 (1), may be changed from time to time by resolution of the city Council. SECTION 6. DISTRICT PROVISIONS. , ' 6.01 Districts The zoning districts are so designated as to assist in carrying out the intent and purposes of the comprehensive plan and to control residential densities in such a manner as to adequately provide public services and utilities. The zoning districts are based upon the Comprehensive Plan which has the purpose of protecting the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare by controlling the needs for public utilities, protecting against traffic congestion and accident hazards, protecting the public health from adverse influences generated by non-residential uses, protecting against the danger of fire conflagration, and other purposes of a similar nature. Page 38 o r 0(' '.....'~... The subdivider should provide the planning commission with the c following information: a) site Location b) A rough sketch of the site showing its general shape and adjacent roadways, waterways, and any other significant features of the immediate area. c) Type of development proposed. d) A preliminary road layout qnd indicating minimum proposed lot size. lotting arrangement SECTION 7. PRELIMINARY PLAT. 7.01 There shall be no conveyance of land described by metes and bounds if the conveyance is less than five (5) acres in area and three hundred (300) feet in width. (10-5-76) 7.02 procedure. prior to platting and subdividing any tract of land into two (2) or more lots, the following procedures shall be followed: a. The subdivider shall file twenty-five (25) copies of preliminary plat with the Clerk at least twenty-three calendar days before the next regular monthly meeting of planning Commission at which meeting said plat shall considered. (9-10-74) the (23) the be b. At the time of the filing of the preliminary plat, the subdivider shall pay to the City a fee as set by Council resolution for plats involving residential lots only, a fee asset by Council resolution for plats involving other than residential lots, plus a fee set by Council resolution for each acre of land in all preliminary plats. (2-18-86) The foregoing fees shall be used to defray the administrative expenses of the City in connection with the review of said plat. City expense incurred in employing the services of the Engineer, Attorney, planner, and other professional consultants in connection with the review of said plat shall be reimbursed to the city by the subdivider. c. The Clerk shall refer seven (7) copies of the preliminary plat to the planning Commission and one (1) copy to the Engineer. d. The Engineer shall submit a written report to the planning Commission, which shall deal with drainage, streets, and other engineering matters pertinent to said preliminary plat. said report shall be submitted to the planning commission at least seven (7) days prior to the public hearing prescribed by the following subsection. e. The planning commission shall hold a public hearing on the preliminary plat within sixty (60) days after said preliminary page 5 o (' 0-' plat is filed with the Clerk. At said hearing all persons interested in the plat shall be heard. Notice of time and place of hearing and the full legal description of the area to be subdivided shall be published once in the official newspaper of the community at least ten (10) days before the day of the hearing. The subdivider shall furnish the Clerk with the names and mailing addresses of the owners of all land within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the boundaries of the. preliminary plat, and the Clerk shall give mailed notice of said hearing to said owners at least ten (10) days prior to the day of said hearing, although failure of any property owner to receive such notification shall not invalidate the p~oceedings. . (9/10/74) f. "'Th' "1.~t{ii'i'hg{C6mmisSion ,shall;conduche,;.,he'i')':,ln'9i('.)\.o'H:'~:'!'~'€hl "..' . r e..l.........:l.m..i:. 'n.'~....a...... r ..'''.'..''.'.1. <l:l..,.€:'.l.:.,".'.'.....:a......'l1. a. . "', .S.h.'-..'a.l'.' .l......:..mcike 't't's~lredtt;;"t:fi'e'!'fc~i1.c1'iiwftnl~ ~~e\ri'~'d:YiL~a " t~:(~~~,~~atd,Jl'e-lrrin~ l It" sh~lf be ""-'the'.-'~uty" ~f',^'t~~ Plann'fn'g Comm1ss10n to determ1ne whether theprel1m1nary plat 1S compatible with the Comprehensive plan and conforms with or exceeds the design standards established by this ordinance. The decision of the Planning Commission with regard thereto, together with its recommendations, shall be included in its report to the Council. 9 . \f~"'f:t.e'{';;::;;;.the:.'" ','Coutio ii.~; r e cerve.s;1;,;,th'e'rii:a'i"\j~'t; .,bff~th~".flari:hfri'~ l8!t,!",~~tf'~ijn~J;;" !;ii;'~;;;';n..~{!i.~\l'f1i ,*t")i~llul,,,)'l!f.....~1;;ij diiti~) 'it ':a'~,!:~~a~E!.,<>'Y.~1l9.(Ji:disapprove the preliminai'Y;jiplat~ If the Council shall oisapprove said plat, the grounds for any such disapproval shall be set forth in the proceedings of the Council and reported to the subdivider within seven (7) days thereafter. h. Approval of a preliminary plat by the Council is tentative only, subject to the compliance with all requirements and recommendations as a basis for preparation of the final plat. i. At the time of the filing of the preliminary plat' the subdivider shall submit to the Clerk a petition for rezoning to the proposed future use of said land if the land is not already so zoned. The owner of said land shall join in said petition. j. Subsequent approval by the Council shall be required of all engineering considerations presented in the preliminary plat which include, but which shall not be limited to easements, water supply, sewage disposal, storm drainage, surface water storage, gas and electric services, road gradients and widths, and the surfacing of streets, prior to the approval of the final plat by the Council. k. ~':~he",i'C,9U.rlCU' !shall'iact ,. on".the,..pr~l,im:l.'nary;,pfat(t,,;..iithir1:f"\fxty , ( 6 0) .'.'.' '.'d - . ~",...71i11'~........,..-'t!''''4iil.'<... ,,""Jill, '" .,." "'~..'>'*h"'Y h'.'i""""..." ,,_,,)<L."f.i'I''1!''d..... '~-'f- ,,''''.''....'- 't'_."'...w....'..." C-I -"k' -,,-',.' I f _ _ ,':~' a 1:i~.;OI:"'-..ne-';.Qa'te on.;w 1C' ..-'waS- t: _-w',-u'. ue-'-';:- er; . the;d~epo'tt..J.'d'f~'tl'i~.Plannin9.comllli s'~ ion ^hai:;'"'n6t'"'been'''re'dei vedwi thin said period, the council shall act without such report. page 6 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Commi ttee, Commission f ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGE Engineering ITEM NO. Computer proposal BY: James E. Schrantz BY: The City Council is requested to consider the proposal presented by Chapel Consulting Inc. evaluating Andover's computer system and needs. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o q ".~. OCHAPEL CONSULTING, INC. MANAGEMENT CONSULT ANTS June 17, 1988 city council city of Andover 1685 crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Dear Council: Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal to assist the city of Andover evaluate its computer system. The computer provides a word processing capability and a utility billing system that sometimes works and sometimes does not. Ameridata is no longer supporting the system. They are not providing corrections to problems, additional training, enhancements to the product or routine assistance in completing the implementation. The city is using DIS, another system vendor, to attempt to keep the system operating. DIS is trying its best to maintain the system with some success but also with failures due to its lack of familiarity with the product. All this has led your auditor, Greg Murphy, the council and staff to conclude that you must ascertain where you stand with the. system and with Ameridata before you can evaluate your options. specifically, you want to know: o Why is the utility billing system so fragile - are there deeper problems that don't meet the eye? o Has Ameridata satisfied its contract with the city? Is the system appropriate for Andover regardless of whether or not the contract has been met? o o What are the possibilities of returning the hard- ware and/or software to Ameridata and getting your money back so you can pursue other options? In sum, system. the city would like to know what to do with the o 8400 E. Prentice Avenue, Suite 825 Englewood. Colorado 80111 (303) 793-3900 (612) 333,3564 (In Minnesota) 23 Empire Drive, Suite 286 Saint Paul, Minn'esota55103 (612) 228-3599 o o o o. -~ city council June 17, 1988 Page 2 We propose to help you by: o Reviewing the city's original specifications. o Reviewing the city's contract with Ameridata. o Evaluating the system and the services rendered to determine how well they meet the original specifi- cations and the terms of the contract. o Advising the city's attorney on the differences. o Helping your attorney, city staff and city council formulate a strategy. The end product of our proposed involvement at this point will be the information and advice to the city' attorney that he needs to advise you on how to proceed with Ameridata. chapel Consulting, Inc. is a management consulting firm with offices in Minnesota and Colorado. We provide professional assistance and advice to local governments and small to medium-size businesses. Our services principally consist of advising clients in the evaluation, selection and implemen- tation of information systems. We have a staff of four senior professional and consulting associates. Our people have a minimum of ten years of busi- ness experience, at least five of which are in management consulting. Collectively, we have over fifty years of managemen:t consulting experience. The founders of Chapel consulting and many of our associates have several years experience as management consultants with national CPA or management consulting firms. We are well-schooled in accounting and computer data base principles. As a firm, we subscribe to the code of Professional conduct of the Institute of Management Consultants. Our senior consultants are all certified Management Consultants (CMCs). Chapel Consulting does not sell nor do we have an Interest In any hardware or software products which might affect our Independence or judgment. o o Q. '~ 41 ,_/ city council June 17, 1988 Page 3 Chapel Consulting, Inc. is experienced with systems of all types but especially with systems used in the management of city government. We have advised cities on the acquisition, implementation and improvements of their systems including troubleshooting and contract negotiation. Some of our local clients include: o Inver Grove Heights o Oak park Heights o Mounds View o Buffalo o South st. Paul o Fridley o st. Anthony In addition, we have worked with both city and non-city clients of George M. Hanson Company. We feel they should be involved if not in this step of the project, then definitely later if it is determined that the system should be partially or completely replaced. We estimate our fees will be about $2,000 - $2,500 for this work as outlined above. In no event will we exceed $2,500 unless council has pre-approved an expansion or significant change in the scope of our involvement. We bill monthly for the actual time expended at our standard hourly rates. If the work takes less time than estimated, we will bill you less. o o Q o ! '--' -,~ city council June 17, 1988 Page 4 Thank you again for the opportunity to be involved with the city of Andover. We feel confident that we can help you make the best of the situation. If this proposal property states your understanding of our assistance in this project, please sign and return it to us as our authorization to proceed. sincerely, ..') I c:- .I James'iF"."'-;ny~er I/~~~ '//(( \ ... CHAPEL CONSUL'rING, INC. , "1;'1\) CITY OF ANDOVER Accepted by Date o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, ,_ Commission \0 Engineering ITEM NO. Fire Dept. Report on Junkyards & Tonson BY: James E. Schrantz See the attached Fire Department reports. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY 0, \~/' Q f?~(// Q/~ ~j'~~4 ~~~~~~ ~ ~ 6-ZZ-~~ j. 9~ \f~ ~~~ ~.~: ~~o _/~a~~i?~ /f h .~~~~ If It II .a;~ F'~ -r-- zrd~ uJ~.. 4rt! ,j~6 ~ ~. ~ -P~ ~~~ J. ~ -I-- 4 f-:.~. ~ r--- ~ ~~--.,- ~ ~~~~: ~~r o ~-~ ~ ~ Q~ ~O., ~ ~~ ~~~~+-r~~. o o (1~\:)) ,~ o ~ J,.e-. ~ ~~~~ zJ~~ .~O->-- ~.--et>-<R. -zi- ~v .;;d:o ~;t /tJ-<>'>-JI ~~~..... ~ f1#. At .-d~ ~ ~ ~,.~~ ~ ~rY<!- ~ ~~_ ~ ~~ I ~__ ~ ~ zf; /-e! CL- ~ 0 ~ ~k AP<J~ ~~~~4?u.~~~J~ ~ ~~ ~ V-- ~~ 'J'I~. oYj ~~A.I~~ ~-/4~ ~ f!-~ /t'kf """'- ~ cL ~ ...dd :;t; ()".:,... h j)~ cJ! ....L~ A-. ~..ALIlJL '^if"-Z; 1~1h"--' a--~" ~~ ~~n.~ ~ ~ ~.~--i'4y ~o.T<U-~ =}- ~~ &LeJ ~ /?; {~ 'V'- 4J~-d-{) pc,? ~ ~"-- ~ r.r ~ (YO- ~ Mz ~ ~ dr{ ~ ~;:d. ~+ /ff~~;4/Jl / ~ /~ a..-e- ~. , --7: D~- ~ J) d~ U cJ :;:Y-4 ~'h,~~% ~ ~~. o o 0: '....-'- @ _!tlLY;~i~jL,il."",2,,-~ 7 dL i[;7?'-'sfC-- a'1 ---i'''<' _ ,_be r I _&av'-e--~~~~--~'~d.-- f{f'~L4rl--e::s- _ 6" d_<L-_J --ltk4{f~- _~aX(&---,d.au--<;,---- ~eC~4__~~,-e'.d----- --It;<!..!.---,,---------''-'-- __um______'_____'_ ,- ....----.----..-------------------.------------.--..-+_._---_...__._~---~_._. - :~-A1~l~~~~---,,--4I~L~ -- :-fl~~7;~ __ . =-~~::-- --- ' ___AL.g-", I'LL<C:.._~,cs:----a-r-<<-----~l-:ie..-5:3.~<'-~1 a/l'c~.d-1&_<- _",',,,u;Lo L-JJ;bes:~'iJ-'LC~~6# ,,{, . 1t4lb:J0by . ,{1ta...,_Jl€---url-.--- -!JA--1-e-__.oI:,____~A<l~n _-I p+-.LB.kU-?L/5' /~:.~~c:cI- t1uJ---;J,~y------!t2 _>>ir:fl-E~Zl?(-I).Ii"'-';S~ 621 ~M v';ltJ~. b'ZS _.I:,,()-rlkS:---~--yj(L,----4,.L:s--,-oo<d-I/,~-$-M~~d .- --~--_.._---_.,'-,-_._.__._---_._-_.,------_._--_.- _~/AAd..~-E~ ;~:~_,~Ul ~:;=-fj~~d-- /-- ; t ti&r~--2ef~~r-Zl~-----:= _-J4-{y~afL~30,-1ch1:-J...u;:~~'--f21/~ "j' ~~td4-- _.Jjv_e..s___.J:eJ.;~5:...~--e-_-$o-'~'t5-al,,~.-'f . -, ,- -..---- ---"--~-----,-_.~._--------_._-------_.._.- ,- {/.:....,-- 1- -_.._-~--._--_.._-_.._._---_....._.------- ._.--~...__._._.._---_._.__._---_.----........_---------~._-------_....... -.-... ----......-..-----.-----.-----.------..-..---...----.-------------~-_._-------_.._------_... .._-_.~- -- . . -, ,.6:''2'---'-'- I~_f>' r;ff,-- 0-,-------------'---'--'------ ..-.---..-...-----------.------------.------- SCANT ICON -- DENVER (late 1988) SCANT ICON - MINNEAPOLIS SCANTICON -- PRINCETON o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE June 21,1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion It m Engineering ITEM NO. Declare Adequacy of, Pet./Park Ave. Est. 79 BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requesting to approve this reso1uti n declaring the adequacy of petition and ordering the preparation of feasibility report for Bent Creek Estates, project 88-20. This is old Park Ave. Estates proposed plat. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, PROJECT NO. 88-20, IN THE BENT CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION AREA. WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated June 16, 1988, requesting the construction of improvements; and WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous. 2. Escrow amount f~r feasibility report is $1000.00. 3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA, and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City day of Council at a Meeting this 19 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl -Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o o ~O ,.0 ,--, June 16, 1988 James E. Schrantz city Engineer city of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 RE: PROPOSED BENT CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. Schrantz: Campbell Real Estate Inc. does hereby petition for improvements by the construction of water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and streets with concrete curb and gutter with the costs of the improvement to be assessed against the benefiting property which is described as: BENT CREEK ESTATES Said petition is unanimous and the public hearing may be waived. We request that a feasibility report be prepared as soon as possible. We have enclosed a check for $1,000.00 for the feasibility report expenses. (TIlE $1,000 WILL E CREDITED TOWARD 15% IMPROVEMENT ESCROW). Developer 15208 Minnetonko Blvd, Minnetonko, MN 55345 (612) 935-8001 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA SECTION NO. Non Discu Engineering ITEM NQ Declare Adequacy of Petition/Sonsteby BY: James E. Schrantz The city Council is requested to consider the petition for sanitary sewer for Rosella Sonsteby property north of 141st Avenue (41st Avenue, Anoka). This area is not in the MUSA. There is a metro interceptor manhole near Rosella's house but the interceptor has not been constructed across the river. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ~~ III 'i~' I'll g _,.._ __,___ _ __p_____ _ ... ~......... -7- ('f%~u_ O_m_L~ ~~, 0 - .. - -- ---I . ,- .. ....!:!f~ - ~~~.~u: ~ illt~J ~~TJ::;:;: ~ lit 1 0_' . . -A- ,~ - ~. J ;'.1.\. D . _ ~ a.--v._~~ L-V Vvv \K/~ l:i~ ~ ~. -~~~~ II . ../ f7 . (J t . 'r ' iJ - i!!~ ~ ~ Vl). fZ-A.-~ Iii ~cd ~ ~.1-L - . ~o_ ~vt I - i-JAA ~ ~ J _ R ~ - i;~~-L, ~ W:~.4, :::~~~~ -r24> d-~~ ~~-~~~ ..i~~~~.. 2~ i;;W~~~ ~iL ~.~ :::.;{ ~~~/'-O) ~~. .; ~~b.A i! ROSELLA SONSTEBY ~ Ii 4151 1415T AilE N\I'i \ O~ : (.1 R~ C9 &-L. ._ '~llLU~~M~ i .sSO ~ SO'~~> \ 25h~~ ,0Il'h --- 5si'lJ; o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AP~P.~ ..R. OV. ED FOR AGE A .tl B'f: v Nnn- _n~ ,~ n... Engineering ITEM NO. Declare Adeq. of Pet./ Rec. Feas./88-17 t~ BY: James E. Schrantz The city Council is requested to approve the resolution 1) Declaring the adequacy of petition and ordering the preparation of feasibility report, 2) accept feasibility report, waive public hearing, order improvement and directing preparation of plans and specs for Red Oaks Manor 5th Addition, project 88-17. The developer paid his escrow for a feasibility report, it is unanimous so, I had the report prepared. The developer will review the report with staff. If the developer ha~ any concerns he will bring them to the meeting. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, PROJECT NO. 88-17, IN THE RED OAKS MANOR 5TH ADDITION AREA. WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated June 7, 1988, requesting the construction of improvements; and WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous. 2. Escrow amount fo! feasibility report is $1000.00. 3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA, and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City day of Council at a Meeting this 19 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR RED OAKS 5TH ADDITION. WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 21st day of June, 1988, order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and presented to the Council on the 21st day of June, 1988; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $300,510.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated total cost of improvements of $300,510.00, waive the Public Hearing and order improvements under Improvement Project 88-17. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby require the developer to escrow the sum of $18,000.00 with such payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and specifications . MOTION seconded by Councilman City Council at a 19 ,with Councilmen and adopted by the day of Meeting this voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APP~?~VED FOR AGE:t ". BY/ i/ Non-Discu~~ion Itpm~ Engineering ITEM NQ Final payment 86-19~87-6 1<1. BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting work and approving final payment for project: 86-19 storm Drainage (project by Good value Homes) no payment made by City. 87-6 Commercial Park grading, Gammon Brothers final payment of $31,351. 99. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK FOR PROJECT NO. 86-19 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF STORM DRAINAGE IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: OUTLOT A NORTHGLEN 2ND ADDITION. WHEREAS, pursuant to an agreement with the City of Andover and Good Value Homes, they have satisfactorily completed the following improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, Minnesota. The work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: victoria volk - City Clerk o o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO GAMMON BROTHERS FOR PROJECT NO. 86-6 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF GRADING IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: COMMERCIAL PARK. WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Andover on SEptember 22, 1987, Gammon Brothers of Rogers, MN has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with such contract. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, Minnesota. The work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the day City Council at a Meeting this of , 19 , with Councilmen of the resolution, and Councilmen voting in favor voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 7.]. lqAA AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non Disc Engineering ITEM NO. Approve Plans & Specs/ 88-1 B~James E. Schran z The city Council is requested to approve the resolution approving the Plans and Specs and ordering ad for bid for project 88-1, Crosstown Boulevard from Bunker Lake Boulevard to 140th Avenue. plans are in the Engineering Office for review. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-1, FOR STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 21st day of June, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the Final plans and Specifications for Project 88-1. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened 10:00 A.M., Friday, July 15, 1988 at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 , with Councilmen voting favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor victoria volk - City Clerk ~ o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT FOR AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Items Engineering ITEM NO. Award Bids/88-2; 88-11 BY: James E. Schrantz The city Council is requested to approve the bid for projects: - 88-2 Ward lake drive, Blue Bird and Yellow Pines street to Forest Lake Contracts Inc. - 88-11 Hidden Creek East phase I to Lake Area utility. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 88-2 FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF BLUEBIRD STREET, YELLOW PINE STREET AND WARD LAKE DRIVE. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. R078-88, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law for Project No. 88-2, with results as follows: Forest Lake Contracting Valley Paving Inc. Gammon Bros. Inc. $311,840.20 $338,476.50 $347,339.05 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate Forest Lake Contracting as being the apparent low bidder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a contract with Forest Lake Contracting in the amount of $311,840.20 for construction of Improvement Project No. 88-2; and direct the City Clerk t'o return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond requirements met. MOTION seconded by Councilman City Council at a 19 , with Councilmen Meeting this and adopted by the day of voting in favor of the resolution, voting against, whereupon and Councilmen said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER Jerry Windschitl - Mayor ATTEST: victoria Volk - City Clerk o o o . , ~, o n Bonestroo -=- Rosene ~ Anderlik & , \J' Associates Otto G. Bonestroo. r,E. Robert W. Rosene. P.E. Joseph C. Anderllk, r.E. Bradford A. lembt"rg. P.E. Rlch.Hd E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, P,E. Glenn R. Cook. r,E. Thomas E. Noyes. r.E. Robert G. Schunlcht, r.E. Marvin L. Satva!..., P.E. Keith A. Gordon, r,E. Richard W. Foster. P.E. Donald C. Burgardt. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P,E. Mark A. Himson, r.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. DavId O. Laskota. r,E. Thomas W. Peterson, r.E. Michael C. Lynch. r.E. James R. Maland, P.E. Kenneth P. Andeuon, P.E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Mark R. Rolfs. r.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus. P.E. Howard A. Sanford. r,E. Charles A. Erickson leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin Mark A. Selp ;?:~':'?-. Engineers & Architects June 6, 1988 City of Andover 1680 Crosstown Blvd. NW Anoka, MN 55303 Attn: Mr. James Schrantz Re: File No. 17124 Ward Lake Drive I1SAP 198-103-01 Dear Jim, Bids were received on the Ward Lake Drive (MSAP 198-103-01), Bluebird Street, Yellow Pine Street and Langseth's Addition at 10:00 A.M. on Thursday, June 2, 1988. The following is a summary of the bids received: Contractor Ward Lk. Dr. Bluebird Yellow Pine Langseths Total - Forest Lake Contracting $185,624.20 $46,142.40 $12,777.60 $67,296.00 $311,840.20 Valley Paving. Inc. 204,250.00 47,494.75 14,716.50 72,015.25 338,476.50 Gammon Bros., Inc. 211,561.80 48,827.55 14,623.95 72,325.75 347,339.05 Northern Aspha~t Constr., Inc. 209,822.51 50,025.99 14,700.50 73,528.00 348,077.90 Hardrives, Inc. 237,526.70 52,886.65 16,058.35 79,859.25 386,330.95 Anderson Bros. Contr'g. Co. 240,631.94 54,158.75 16,508.67 82,637.17 393,936.53 Alber Constr. Inc. 258,908.30 56,498.35 17,420.65 90,890.75 423,718.05 Preliminary Report $226,925.00 $55,350.00 $16,860.00 $91,700.00 $390,835.00 We would recommend that this project be awarded to the low bidder, Forest Lake Contracting, for the amount of $311,840.20. The award should be made contin- gent upon State Aid approval which is expected in the next week. o Page 1. ______...._ r-r..... _ L1.,L,L.4Lnn o o City of Andover Andover, MN Re: File No. 17124 The State Aid is eligible for have to be paid o 01 June 6, 1988 office has indicated that MSA participation. There for by the City. 83.3% of the storm sewer construction is approximately $3,400 that will If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~ ~~( Glenn R. Cook GRC: li 24 Page 2. o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 88-11 FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF HIDDEN CREEK EAST PHASE II. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. R089-88, May 17, 1988, bids were received, opened arid tabulated according to law, with results as follows: Lake Area Utility Richard Knutson, Inc. S.J. Louis Const. $259,441.17 $268,073.37 $288,192.90 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate Lake Area Utility as being the apparent low bidder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a contract with Lake Area Utility in the amount of $259,441.17 for construction of Improvement Project No. 88-11; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder ~nd the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond requirements met. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Engineering Award bid/Hidden Cr. Pk/Parkin Lot BY: Todd J. Haas June 21, 1988 ~1V. i The City Council is requested to award the bid for gradi' of Hidden Creek Park parking lot to Renollett Trucking Inc. 1. Renollett Trucking Inc. (price includes culvert) 2. Burton Kraabel Construction Inc. (does not include culvert) 3. North Pine Aggregate (does not include culvert) MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY $2255.05 $2220.40 $4150.00 o o CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 HIDDEN CREEK PARK PARKING LOT (estimated calculations) * Parking Lot - 137 yards of class V (4" of class V depth minimum) * Contractor is required to remove topsoil and grade parking lot with 1% minimum grade. * No offsite clean fill will be necessary for site due to the abundance of clean fill already existing on location. * Topsoil and seed all disturbed areas. * Contractor is to ~rovide seed. * See diagram for location of activities. Bid opening is on June 9, 1988 at 10:00 A.M. at Andover City Hall. " ,I , . '. " "- , on => o z '2 => !: .. --- --- --- -- -------- --- -ill. a.' <( ~ :'<l' " ~ ~'" ~ 'l\, ,II ~/~,.- ~- ____'-__--~ L: "' ."1 "I ,~ ;; w:. '" \l -'--"""'.;;0.---. <I \l \(\ '" Cl , , , , " -. -.. .. r"---- -------- --- , I , , \ , I , - -- -, I I I I ......0--- -- --;..-...----~- ~ '>------ c . F~ ~';J ;~~-.2~(~L :~~- ": ~~' L:rlr l:~~'.L~\~-~2 -.t ,\! - "';:--- .! ;/4:; I ---- ,/~B?q-;",---__ ---- , , ;1 tl " \- I i I \1 \1~!1 ll~( 1,'%' !l 1 iI_' \ '-' :1 ! H "" ' \:.... ' \: ,I .Y i I I ! . , . , , , , , \ , :~ ) ~ ~~ !. IN :' ~i \'0. i !. I \: - :' - . \ ~ L_ , ,- I ~ --- / .....-"'" "\. ' ~ -- 101' /,' ? OO~9LG-~ " ,'_ ,3,jgt"OSOOS - -- c:l , / , " -', , . I' 't' ,- Ii' ..- ;.'// // /(, 1// /' //' ' /// .''- ,/ /,,' /"j."'/r' p" 1',.' . y p y ,/ ,{// ..~-", ...." . "'/'" '-.J------ /' "'.... "1--- , ;- ,,' ;' ; ,; , , : " ..,."'. -' o / .. , , I' -' ,'" -- ~oo l.L. n '~' \ , I '" => o z '2 => 1: CD 'N N . ' " Ii II " I_ I J 'j --I.~, 'O! a)~ I .! \ : l -! , , , \ \ , - ! ~~ I.' a; \ 1'0!ii :.,~-I' ' . \ i'. ~ i i': I 1\ \>..~~'-~ ~ ~ i : ,,\~ ;;:2 L'-:', "i i i< . "" ~ . I " r'-, ,- ~....' I j I ...tl : (t'1"';" ',~'~ ' ~ . - Iii \", ..~..., ',/ - ....--... ;.--....... ~-------"'.... .,..,,,..... r-: OO'OGG r 3..917 .090 OS i ~ , --~. --:~ ~-------- / /' --, , , /- .o/, .' / I I' t"i' / /f' /' ." /:,/", ..- I'- , ,I -' /1' /';" J- . /' ,./ ,. . /" , ,;/ /' 4~ , , , ' - : -' ...' o ,#--' " ,,,' ~oo ~-~ \ .- ':h'I'L::. . ..;-i:-: tl....i : ";~ '!i~: ;it....5 .: -.",-..", pi-:" . :.;:ft.!:~:: ~t}1 : .~" ,; 1."'"la' 1"<1.., .' .'t,,' ~;.. : of; ~ .... ~ ~;: t~~. . ...... "'\"~"I'.' 't~ l." ~. ... \-.1. t~":~.! .:'. " -'Of-'.' '-."-1'" , ~:l;'n~]! './ !. '.. ..I '.~ J ' 1~{1~1.3.:; ..".!.....O, ~ \ ~~.. ~'. j" _ n.. ."'I!~.'; I, ,'. ~ -":~~; :(~I~ ..'/.... ",:., ""t. q: ~;~~\j( .:~ ''). . 1:::' :" ..... .', .:i~ . -. ;.;:. ':""'~~ l.~~ . ", ",',i . J. .i.' . kJ""1 :.~,~::'; :~I ,('~~'~ Q-.- '.:~~:'- ~ : .....;J .. '" . ~ . " ': . I I <, ~ ~.,,-,. .....~. ',....., .. - - , ',~,~ -~.-:" ,"" ',,,'" ".oJ;>.....<.."..... ... ;:;"~o,;;.. . COUNTY OF ANOKA Depanment of Highways Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520 l...R E- ~~'-;jV fl -u'; ~ '. \h~; .~' )] ~". ~ ,. _~..---.n""__""-"-'-1 .. J 'n\ j:;PR 1_ ~. 1988 \1 : ;.....---_. April 7, 1988 city of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN. 55304 Attention: Jim Schrantz, City Engineer CiTY Or- .~,NDOVr::R Regarding: .Hidden Creek .Park Entrance Dear Jim: We have reviewed the proposed sketch for an entrance to a parking lot in the Hidden Creek Park. The access off of Bunker Lake Boulevard is acceptable as shown being opposite the entrance to the Speedy Market. Currently a by-pass lane exists on Bunker Lake Boulevard on the intersection with Crosstown Boulevard and with this situation, the entrance to the parking lot is not ideal. However, it appears to be the best that can be achieved at the present time. If a new County Road 18 alignment is constructed further to the east, it appears appropriate that the by-pass lane at the intersection with Crosstown be eliminated to create a safer entrance and exit from the parking lot. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, S3df'~~ William A. Sironen, PE Assistant County Engineer - Administration o " Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE June 21. 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discus Engineering ITEM NO. Approve ROW/88-1; 87-11 BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to accept the easements and approve payment for R/W acquisition for projects 87-11, trunk watermain and sanitary sewer to school; 87-7, Shady Knoll; and 88-1, Crosstown. The owners and amounts are attached in Bill's letter. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY \L'\" o o LAW OFFICES OF ?/2-J (gg Rurlle nnd Jlnwllins JOHN M. BURKE WILLIAM G_ HAWKINS BARRY M. ROBINSON SUITE 101 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA 55433 PHONE (612) 784-2998 June 7, 1988 ~'._"--"..' -'-'---' ~.r E t.-~ 5 ij V E..D". ~----l 'j \1 JUN 0 8 19G8 r .- ~ 1 Mr. James E. Schrantz Andover City Hall l685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 r~TY OF I\NDOVER Dear Jim: We have reached an agreement with the property owners listed below for acquisition of an eaSement over their property. The agreed upon amount is: Parcel Name Amount l-88-l Mabel A. Foster and $ 2,800.00 Douglas C. Foster 8-87-11 Thomas J. Bough,ton and $ 230.00 Cynthia R. Boughton 9-87-11 Richard J. Schne ider $ l,350.00 and Stella B. Schneider lO-87-11 Ernest W. Trettel and $ 600.00 Mar ilyn D. Trettel Would you please present this to the City Council for approval. If the City Council approves this, please send checks in the above amounts to my office for distribution to the property owners. Also the acceptance needs to be completed by the clerk and returned to my office for recording. <f)cer~lY' ~ Hawkins " WGH:mk Enc. o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE June 21, 1988 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering FOR ITEM NO. Approve Res./88-19/ Woodland Cr. II ~ BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the project resolution for Woodland Creek Phase II Project 88-19. The Council approved proceeding with the project as a contract change order to Project 87-27, Woodland Creek Phase I. Woodland requested the change order and the rush so S.J. Louis, the Contractor on Phase I, can continue with Phase II without moving out. I have written the first resolution for all improvements, the change order is for water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage. I will then have the itreets bid or change order on a different project so we do not exceed the 25%. Feasibility Report in packet. Contract Change order to be handed out at meeting. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-19, FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION IN THE WOODLAND CREEK PHASE II AREA. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , adopted by the City Council on the 21st day of June, 1988, TKDA has prepared final plans and specifications for the improvements.; and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 21st day of June, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andove~ to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications for Project No. 88- 19. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct ~he Engineer to seek public bids as required by law, or a change order, to Project 87-27, Woodland Creek Phase I. MOTION seconded by Councilman by the City Council at a Meeting this and adopted day of , 19 , with Councilmen voting favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY O~ ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PROJECT NO. 88-19, IN THE WOODLAND CREEK PHASE II AREA. WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated June 7, 1988, requesting the ~onstruction of improvements; and WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous. 2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is $1000.00. 3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA, and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City day o~ Council at a Meeting this 19 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR PROJECT 88-19, WOODLAND CREEK PHASE II. WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 21st day of June, 1988, order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and presented to the Council on the 21st day of June, 1988; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $286,000.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated total cost of improvements of $286,000.00, waive the Public Hearing and order improvements for under Improvement Project 88-19. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby require the developer to escrow the sum of $17,000.00 with such payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and specifications. MOTION seconded by Councilman City Council at a 19 ,with Councilmen Meeting this and adopted by the day of voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 88-19 FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF WOODLAND CREEK PHASE II. WHEREAS, as the Project will be a contract change order to 87-27 Woodland Creek Phase I. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the contract to S.J. Louis. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a contract with S.J. Louis in the amount of $ for construction of Improvement Project No. 88-19. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19_ with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ,0