HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC December 19, 1989
e-.
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
License Files
Jay Blake, City Planner
December 19, 1989
Junkvard Inspection Results
I have completed the inspections for Mom's Auto Parts and Best
Auto Parts. The yards have met the criteria outlined in
Ordinance 44. The tires cited in the first inspection on both
properties have been removed.
staff recommends approval of the Mom's Auto Parts and Best Auto
Parts Junkyard Licenses.
o
o
~
DEAR CITY COUNCIL:
10 c:,c_
{2-/1!I/7/ ?f
WE WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE YOU TO OU~ MEALS ON WHEELS
"RO.OOM. WE SERVE HOT.NUTRITIONALLY BALANCED NOO. .EOLS
HOMEBOUND .EO.LE IN rOUR "EA. WE ...~ P"MAR'L" TO
SEI,: I o/:{S OVEF' THE i=iGE 0::- 6(" f:U"" . C?1r\' ':LSO SEF.~VE TC
NON-S.NIORS AT .ULL COST. WE "ROVIDE BRECIAL D'ETS AS
A. 'EGUL.. ONES. OND ARE THEREFORE ..LE TO MEET ACMOS'
DIETARY REQUI~MENT~
T,-,
w
OURS IS A VOLUNTEER PROGRAM.
THF;oUGH VOLUNTEEI::: DF: I VEF:S ('iHO
CONTRIBUTION TO THE PROGRAM.
SUf:'F'OR:~~ BASE c
t-llELL
ANi~
THE I'lEALS
F'F~:OV I DE {...
t.rJE:~ H;iVE 14
AF::E: DEL I VEF.~ED
LAF;GE It'./I< I ND
L;:'1F:;~GE CONMUN I Ti'
THE AREAS THAT THE NO." A.OKA MEALS OK WHEELS PROGRAM
SERVES 15 ST.~R~ANC2S. BET~E~.
GROVE. NORTYERN RAMSEv, NORTHERN ANDOVER. CEDAR,
SODS"'.' r LLE · HAM LAKE. COO," LA"E. LINWOOD. c I NO LA"ES.
CI RCLS P. "ES. CENTERU r L LS . C E" NO TO,.; AND EASTERN POR TI ON OF
Eii....AINE.
EAST BETHEL;BURNS. OAk
'N AN EFFORT TO RAISE .'.'8 .OR OUR PROGRAM IT HAS CO~ TO
LIGHT THAT SOME COM"~[TrE. HAVE COM"~ITY BLOC. .'.N'
FUNDS AVA'LABLE FOR HUMAN SERVICES. WE ARE INTERESTED I"
BEING AB~E TO APPLY ~OR THESE FUNDS WHERE THEY ARE
AWHLABlE: .
WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN INDICATION OF WHEN YOUR CITY OR
TOWNSHIP WILL .EDI8PE'.". THE CO.. FUNDS F~ HUMAN
SERVICES.SO THAT WE NAY SUBMIT AN APPLICATION.
WE ~~E REQUESTING THAT YO~p CITy COMTACT US AT:
NORTH ANOf'::A NEALE ON ('JI-iEELE
1562 VIJ(ING BLVD~
CEDAF:, MN. 55011
XMAGGI NOVAV. DIF::ECTOF:
7Yj~. 7? ~<-
Dk-~~L~ur -
H/0EC 71989 I
-...._-~
CITY OF ANDOVER
..
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
December 8, 1989
Mr. Gary L. Englund, P.E., Chief
Section of Water Supply and Well Management
Minnesota Department of Health
P.O. Box 9441
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Re: Compliance with Radionuclide Standards
Municipal Water System
Andover, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Englund:
This is in response to your recent correspondence with the City
regarding the radium content of the City's drinking water, and
plans to achieve compliance with the drinking water standards for
radium.
The City will not be able to comply with the MCL for combined
Radium 226 and 228 by June 1, 1990 if the standard is to be
established at a total of 5 picocuries per liter. However, it is
also recognized that the standard is being considered for
revision, allowing a maximum of 5 picocuries each for Radium 226
and 228, based on EPA's letter to you dated December 7, 1988.
The referenced letter also stated that a final decision on the
radium standard was anticipated in the fall of 1989; we are not
aware of that decision.
The City of Andover has commissioned Toltz, King, Duvall,
Anderson and Associates, Inc. (TKDA) to initiate a study of the
methods of achieving compliance, and the engineering work has
proceeded. Even this engineering work has been impeded by
difficulties with analytical discrepancies. Nevertheless, we are
advised by TKDA that the impact of the final standard (5
picocuries per liter of combined radium vs. 5 picocuries per
liter each of Radium 226 and 228) is significant, since our Well
No.3 water and that from the pilot well for Well No.4, fall
into the range of radium concentrations which either comply or do
not comply, untreated, depending upon the standard adopted. The
City cannot proceed with confidence on a plan for overall radium
reduction in its drinking water until the required level of that
reduction is defined.
~
It should also be noted that the wells with the highest radium
concentrations, Nos. 1 and 2, have been relegated to a back-up
position in the pumping sequence, and that the City's new
elevated storage tank (currently under construction) is designed
-
,.
o
Page Two
December 8, 1989
Mr. Gary Englund, P.E., Chief
to provide the consumers with water from wells other than Nos. 1
and 2 to the greatest extent possible. However, to proceed
further with a remedial plan, or even to schedule the steps, a
water quality goal must be established.
The City submits that our system, with Well Nos. 1 and 2 in
limited use, falls into a status similar to that recognized by
other states' regulatory agencies which require municipal water
systems to proceed only with engineering studies, and not
specific improvements, until and unless a final determination of
the MCL for radium is established. We request a similar
requirement of the City, deferring any requirements other than
studies until such time as the standard is finalized.
Please advise us further with respect to this request to postpone
definitive action until the final MCL's are promulgated.
~~
~ames E. Schrantz
~~ity Engineer
JES:kmt
CC: Andover City Council
John Davidson, TKDA
c
\
o
-ro C,C,
l<j;f/i:?9
ISO COMME:RCIAL RISK SE:RVICE:S, INC.
- =...~ - ~,,,. ....,,,,"',, - ,,'. -= ,.",,,, -- ?i"r' firS
D1vfi?16 &6
MERLE M. HAPPEL, CPCU f.4:yy_)
REGIONAL DIRECTOR
Ml/~~ca....
Mr. James Elling, Mayor
16ff5 ~rosstown BLvd NW
Andover~ MN 55304
November 14, 19B9
Daar Mr. ELling:
We are encloSing Classification Details and Improvement
St.t...... I. ".p.... .. y... ...... '.q..... Th... .".'1.
... .......... c.,.. 'h. I.... which ... ""'.'. " ... F...
S.pP....,.. R.tl.g SCh...,., ... .h'ch ... .f I.p.....c. I.
determining your fire insurance Classification.
Th... Cl....f,c..,.. 0".". ... r.p..,..... St.t...... ....
."".p.. "'.g 'h. I.f.....,.. 'b'.,... ...i.g ... ,gg5 ""'y
... ........ 'h.. c"."'... i. y... "'y ....,. .h. ..... Th.,
"f.. "" t. tho fl.. I......c. '.".g """f'c.t,.. .f Y'"
c"y, .h"h .., b. "'d ,. tho '.'c".ti.. .f P"P..., I........
p,...... ... ... ... f.. P"P...y I... P"""'" .. llf. ..f..y
purposes.
Th. ci., cl""fic.ti.. .Ppli.. .. P"P...,.. "th . ...... fl..
fl.. .f a5DD .P' .. I.... Th. p",... ... P'bl'c P....c.,.. ..
P"P...,.. ."h '..g.. f... fl... ... i'.i".,."y ".1.....,
and may vary from the city Classification.
p,.... c..t.ct .. 'f Y" h.,. ..y q........ "'C""'. .h.
enclosed material.
Yours very truly,
~K~
ck:j h
Charles I<vistad
Field Representative
enc.
A SUBSIDIARY OF INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
.'
o
FIRE INSURANCE CLASSIFICATION
IMPROVEMENT STATEMENTS
FOR
ANDOVER, MN
PREPARED BY
ISO COMMERCIAL RISK SERVICES, INC.
6550 YORK AVENUE S
SUITE 600
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435
AT THE REQUEST OF JAMES ELLING, MAYOR
NOVEMBER 10, 1989
The following statements are based upon the criteria contained
in our Fire Suppression Rating Schedule and upon conditions in
Andover, MN on April 15, 1985. They indicate the performance
needed to receive fuLL credit for the specific item in the
Schedule and the quantity, you have provided. Partial
improvement will resuLt in receiving a partial increase in the
credit. These statements relate only to the fire insurance
classification of your city. They are not for p~operty loss
prevention or Life safety purposes and no Life safety or
property loss prevention recommendations are made.
RECEIVING AND HANDLING FIRE ALARMS
Credit For Telephone Service (Item 414).
(411.A.)
For maximum credit in the Schedule, there should be 3 incoming
telephone Lines reserved for receiving notification of fires.
You had D lines credited as reserved in 1987. These 911 lines
wouLd be credit as reserved if a new survey was done. Our
policy on this item has changed sinc~ you were last graded.
c
(412.B.)
For maximum credit in the Schedule, both the number to report a
fire and a fire department business number shouLd be listed
under "Fire Department" in the white pages directory. Your fire
number is Listed and your business number is not Listed under
"Fire Department".
o
(412.C. J
For maximum credit in the Schedule, both the number to report a
fire and the fire department business number should be listed
under the name of the city the white pages directory. Your fire
number is listed and your busineas number is not listed under
the name of the city.
Credit for Dispatch Circuits (Item 432).
(431.8.-1 )
For maximum credit in the Schedule, the vOice-amplification
alarm dispatch circuit should be electrically supervised.
Total credit for Receiving and Handling Fire Alarms (440J.
Actual Credit 7.39%; Maximum Credit 10.00%.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Credit for Engine Companies (Item 513J.
(511. + 512.)
You have 2 engine companies in service. These ere calculated as
follows:
60% for Engine 4881 because of insufficient equipment,
hose (there should be at least 1200' of 2 1/2" or
larger hose) and pumper tests.
50% for Engine 4886 because of insufficient equipment,
hose (there should be at least 1200' of 2 1/2" or
larger hose) and pumper tests.
Credit for Reserve Pumpers (Item 523).
(520. + 521.)
For maximum credit
pumper is needed.
in the Schedule, 1 fully-equipped
You have no reserve pumper.
reserve
Credit for Ladder Service (Item 549).
(540. + 541. J
For maximum credit in
needed in you city.
the schedule, 2 service companies are
These are calculated as follows:
o
2 service companies dues to the size of the area
serviced.
o
(542-547.)
You have 0 ladder and 1 service company. This is calculated as
follows:
16% for Combined Service Company 81-86-87 because of
insufficiant equipment.
Cradit for Reserve Ladder Service (Item 553).
(550. + 551.)
For maximum credit in the
service truck is needed.
Schedule, 1 fUll-equipped reserve
You have no reserve service truck.
Credit for Distribution (Item 561).
(560.)
For maximum credit in the Schedule, all sections of the city
with hydrant protection shoudl be within 1 1/2 miles of an
adequately-equipped engine company and 2 1/2 miles of an
adequately-equipped ladder, service, engine-ladder, or
engine-service company. The distance to be measured along
all-weather roads.
Credit For Company Personnel (Item 571).
An increase in the response of fire department members by one
person will increase the fire department .33%
Credit For Training (Item 581).
(580.A.-G.)
For maximum credit in the Schedule, complete facilities should
be'provided for training and the training program should be
improved. You receive 3.48% credit for the current training
program and the use of faci lities.
(58D.H.)
For maximum credit in the Schedule, pre-fire planning
inspections of each commercial, industrial institutional and
other simi lar type bui ldi ng shou ld be made twice a year by
company members. Records of the inspections should include
complete and up-to-date notes and sketches.
(580.1)
For maximum credit in the Schedule, records should be kept of
all training.
o
o
c
WATER SUPPLY
Credit For the Water System (Item 616).
(612. )
For maximum credit in the SChedule, the needed fire flows should
be available at each location in the city. Needed fire flows of
2500 gpm and less should be available for two hours, 3000 and
3500 gpm for three hours and all others for four hours. See the
attached table for an evaluation of fire flow tests made at
representative locations in the city.
Credit for Inspection and Conditions of Hydrants (Item 631).
(630.)
For maximum credit in the Schedule, all hydrants should be
inspected twice a year, the inspection should include operation
and a test at domestic pressure. Records should be kept of the
inspections. Hydrants should be conspicuous, well located for
Use by a pumper, and in good condition.
o
FIRE FLOW TESTS
Andover, MN
Test Made on April 15, 1985
-
I I f Li mi ted Limi ted f
f Needed f Limited I by by I
f Test Fire Flow* I by I Distribution Hydrant I
I No. apm I S !!QJULJiQ.!:.!s.L I Mains Sucing I
I I I f
I 1 2000 I 677 f AJequate AJequate f
f f f f
I 2 1000 I 677 I 2500 AJequate I
I I I I
I 3 1000 I 677 I 3700 Adequate f
f I f f
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I f I I
I f I I
f I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-L-_ L____ I 1
*Needed fire flows exceeding 3500 gpm are not considered in determining
the classificetion of the municipality.
c
"
o
CLASSIFICATION DETAILS
Municipality
An ,.1 rnT,:::) l'"
State
M1\j
Population 9387
Date Surveyed
April IS. ]98S
Total Credit 4S.fi9. Cless fi/Q
RECEIVING AND HANDLING FIRE ALARMS
This section of the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule reviews
facilities providad for the general public to report fires,
and for the operator on duty at the communication center to
dispatch fire department companies to the fires.
Credit
Actual
. Maximum
1. [Item 414J Credit for Telephone Service
This item reviews the facilities provided
for the public to report fires, including
the listing of fire and business numbers
in the telephone directory.
0.89
2.00
2. [Item 422J Credit for Operators
This item reviews the number of operators
on-duty at the communcation center to
h~ndle fire calls.
3.00
3.00
--
3. [Item 432J Credit for Dispatch Circuits
This item reviews the dispatch circuit
facilities use to transmit alarms to
department members.
3.50
5.00
4. [Item 440J Total Credit for Receiving
and Handling Fire Alarms
7.39
10.00
o
o
FIRE DEPARTMENT
This section of the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule reviews
engine and ladder-service companies, equipment carried, response
to fires, training and available fire fighters.
Credit
Actual
Maximum
1. (Item 513) Credit for Engine Companies
This review is for the number of engine compa
companies and the hose and equipment
car r i e d . ~. ~:;>
10.00
2. (Item 523) Credit for Reserve Pumpers
--
This item reviews the number of reserve
pumpers and their pump capaicty and the
hose and equipment carrried on each.
0.2~
1.00
3. (Item 532) Credit for Pump Capacity
This item reviews the total available
pump capacity.
5.00..
5.00
4. (Item 549) Credit for Ladder Servica
This item reviews the number of ladder
and service companies and the equipment
carried.
0.95
5.00
5. (Item 553) Credit for Reserve Ladder Service
--
This item reviews the number of reserve
ladder and service trucks, and the equipment
ca'rried.
0.09
1.00
6. (Item 561) Credit for Distribution
This item reviews the percent of the
built-upo~ area of the city which has an
adequately-equipped, responding first-due
engine company within 1 1/2 miles and an
adequately-equipped, responding ladder-sarVica
company within 2 1/2 mi les. ~O.OO
7. (Item 571) 'Credit for Company Personnel
4.00
C)
This item reviews the average number of
equivalant fire fighters and company
officers on duty with existing companies.
3.96
15.00+
I
I
o
o
8. (Item 581) Credit for Training
This item reviews the training facilities
and their use.
9. (Item 590) Totel Credit for Fire Department 19.22.,
3.48
WATER SUPPLY
1. (Item 616) Credit for the Water System
This item reviews the supply works, the
main capacity and hydrant distribution.
2. (Item 621) Credit for Hydrants
This item reviews the type of hydrants,
and method of installation.
3. (Item 631) Credit for Inspection and
Condition of Hydrants
This item reviews the frequency of
inspections of hydrants and their
condition.
4. (Item 640) Total Credit for Water Supply
Actual
J.l.:.lL
2.00
--
3.00
22.71
C red it
9.00
50.00+
Maximum
35.00
2.00
3.00
40.00
--
o
CLASSIFICATION DETAILS
Date Surveyed___JillXiLJj~_~8~
Tots l C red it 4')..6.9 _
M un i c i pal i t Y --4..Il9.Q.Y.~L_.__.____ S t s t e--MN.__ Pop u l a tin
SUMMARY OF CREDIT
Assigned
Maximum
Credit
Receiving and Handling Fire Alarms
Fire Department
Water Supply
*Divergence
7.39
19.25
22.71
-3.66
10.00%
50.00
40.00
45.69 100.00
The Public Protection Class is based on the total percentage
credit as follows:
Class ~
1 90.00 or mo re
2 80.00 to 89.99
3 70.00 to 79.99
4 60.00 to 69.99
5 50.00 to 59.99
6 40.00 to 49.99 ,
7 30.00 to 39.99:
8 20.00 to 29.99
9 10.00 to 19.99
10 0 to 9.99
*Divergence is a reduction in credit to reflect a difference in the
relative credits for Fire Department and Water Supply.
The above classification has been developed for fire insurance rating
purposes only.
c
LAW OFFICES OF
(0 c.C,
/ 2/;7/g<j
o
RurKe and ..HawKins
JOHN M. BURKE
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
SUITE 101
299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD
COON RAPtDS. MINNESOTA SS433
PHONE (612) 784-2998
December 14, 1989
~u
-
CITY OF ANDOVER
Mr. James E. Schrantz
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Tonson, Inc.
Dear Jim:
The following is to give you an update concerning the status of
the Tonson lawsuit. On December 12, 1989 I attended a partial
Summary Judgment Motion in District Court with Ms. Ann Cohen of
the Attorney General's office. The purpose of the Motion was to
ask the Court to enter judgment against Tonson Tire, Inc., Waste
Recycling and Milton LaPanta for the costs of the clean-up. The
City's costs per letter of Jim Elling were $9,100.00. The Court
has taken this matter under advisement and will render its
decision within the next several months. If you have any
further questions, please contact me.
,
G. Hawkins
WGH:mk
o
LAW OFFICES OF
10 cc.
/2);7) t?7
, ....
..-
Burke IlHd JlIlWkiHS
o
JOHN M. BURKE
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
SUITE 101
299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD
COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA !5!5433
PHONE (612) 784-2998
"--;"E C E IV t .~-'
"[DEe 1519891U
December 13, 1989
The Honorable Mayor and
City Council Members
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
Re: Assessment Procedure - l73rd Avenue N.W.
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
The following opinion is in regard to your questions concerning
procedures under Minnesota Statute S429.031 for petitioning of
improvement projects and their application to the l73rd Avenue
N.W. street improvement.
FACTS:
The City Council received a petition for the improvement
of l73rd Avenue from residents who reside on Navajo Street
and access to their houses by use of l73rd Avenue. No
owners along 173rd Avenue signed the petition. After
consideration of the petition and conducting a public
hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statute S429, the City
Council ordered the improvement on a simple majority vote
of the Council.
The question you ask is:
QUESTION:
o
In determining the adequacy and legality of the petition
for local improvements made pursuant to Minnesota Statute
S429.03l, Subd. 1, must the petition be signed by the
owners of property which abut the street that is proposed
to be improved or may individuals who do not abut the
street but will be assessed for the improvement thereof be
included in the calculations to determine the 35% in
frontage and reduce the vote to a simple majority from a
4/5 majority.
---
Mayor and Council
December 13, 1989
Page 2
Members
o
OPINION:
1. That portion of Minnesota Statute S429.031, Subd. 1 which is
material reads as follows:
"The hearing may be adjourned from time to time and a
resolution ordering the improvement may be adopted at any
time within six months after the date of the hearing by
vote of majority of all members of the council. When the
improvement has been petitioned for by the owners of not
less than 35% in frontage of the real property abutting on
the streets named in the petition as location of the
improvement."
I have reviewed several attorney generals' opinions which
indicate that in order for the vote to be reduced to a simple
majority the petition must be signed by persons who own property
on the street named in the petition as location of the improve-
men t.
Accordingly it is my opinion that since none of the owners of
property on 173rd Avenue, the location of the proposed street
improvement, have signed the petition, a 4/5 majority vote of
the Council was necessary to order the project. In view of the
fact that only 3/5 vote ordered the improvement, such resolution
did not pass and the project may not proceed at this time with-
out the requisite vote. Since the statute allows the adoption
of the resolution ordering the improvement any time within six
months after the date of the hearing, the City Council would
have the authority to adopt a resolution ordering the project by
4/5 vote, if done so within that time period. I would
recommend, however, that prior to doing so that the residents be
notified again of the hearing and the purpose thereof in the
same manner as they were notified for the original hearing. If
no action is taken by the City Council to reconsider this
project, it will automatically terminate on February 15, 1990
pursuant to statute.
WGH:mk
)
. .., .;.-.i;-~~',''';i1;','',\;,~~,
DATE: December 19, 1989
o
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Letter from North Anoka Meals on Wheels
Regular City Council Minutes (12/05/89)
Special City Council Minutes (11-29-89)
General Information on Seminars
Planning & Zoning Minutes (11-28-89)
Business Beat
Letter to Gary Englund
Letter from ISO Commercial Risk Services
Letter from Burke & Hawkins re:TONSON
Letter from Burke & Hawkins re:88-16
Letter from Lawrence Bastian/Teamsters Union No. 320
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
o
affiliated with the
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA
3001 University Avenue S.E.-Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414..... FAX (612) 331-8948
Phone (612) 331-3873
MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC & LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION
LOCAL NO. J20
D E C-E~ V t.'-d~--.
,~ DEe 14 1989/U
CITY OF ANDOVER
December 13, 1989
Mr. James E. Schrantz
City Administrator
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, Mn 55304
RE: Contract Opener for 1990
For Andover Public Works Department
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
As the exclusive representative for our members in the
above referenced bargaining unit, we are hereby notifying
you that we have opened the contract for negotiations for
the year 1990.
Our demands will be submitted at a later date.
Sincerely,
TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 320
M. Bastian
Agent
LMB/jrnm
OPEIU-#l2
Enclosure
o
United To Protect
~
o
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting-December 19, 1989
7:30 P.M. Call to Order
o
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Glatt Request
2. Watt's Garden Acres Sketch Plan/Comm. Blvd
Alignment
3. Metes & Bounds Park Dedication
4. Ordinance 53 Amendment
5. Ordinance 62 Amendment
6. Kensington Estates 4th Addition
Staff, Committee, Commission
7. License Renewals
8. Authorize Election Equip. Purchase
9. Award Computer Bid
10. Award Bid/Recycle Bins
11. Award Bid/IP89-24/Comm. Park Pond
12. Rose Park Discussion
13. Address Similarities
14. Equestrian Council Appointments
15. Open Burning, Cont.
16. utility Bills/Due Date Discussion
17. Compensation/Compo Plan Task Force
Non-Discussion Items
18. Accept Assessment Roll/88-8, 88-17
19. Declare Costs, 89-4; 88-20
20. Accept Easements/Uplander Street
21. Approve Street Construction/Lund's 4th Addn.
22. Approve Engineering Rates/Bonestroo Eng.
23. ProclamationLChemical-Free Week
24. Accept County Roads
25. Approve Final Payment/87-10
Approval of Claims
Adjourn
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
December
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Approval of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
Approval of Minutes
, ~)Y
Vicki Volk ~.
ITEM
NO.
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
November 29, 1989
December 5, 1989
Special Meeting
Regular Meeting
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n~~~mh~y 19, J999
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Items
1
ITEM Glatt Request
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~~Uvv/
Jay Blake City Planner
BY:
APPR.~OVE~. FOR
AGEN [j-J
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to consider the request of
James Glatt to amend Ordinance 8 defining the term "animal unit"
and replacing the terjl\"animal" under Section 7.03.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Glatt is proposing to add to his existing farming
operation. See the enclosed maps. His plan includes seven
buildings (I-vegetable processing, 2-chicken buildings and 4 hog
houses). There has been a great deal of concern over the massive
expansion of the operation.
PLANNING REVIEW
Ordinance 8 currently allows Mr. Glatt to have five (5) non-
domesticated animals per acre without obtaining a Special Use
Permit. The Glatt property is approximately 115 acres in area.
Mr. Glatt could have 575 animals before a Special Use Permit would
be required.
Ordinance 57 (Ag. Preserve Ordinance), Section 4, subsection d
states that a commercial feedlot (any place where more than 15
non-domesticated animals are kept) requires a Special Use Permit.
Chapter 7020 of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Water
Quality regulations defines the term "animal unit" a unit of
measure used to compare differences in the production of animal
manure. A swine over 55 pounds is considered .4 animal units and
a chicken is .01 animal units. The PCA requires that an applicant
receives a feedlot permit if there is more than 10 animal units.
A copy of the proposed regulations is included in the packet.
.
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
Page 2
Glatt Request
December 19, 1989
Clearly, the City is more restrictive than the PCA (15 animals
versus 10 animal units).
Mr. Glatt's proposal for the number of animals on the property is
depicted in the following chart:
ANIMALS
Swine (including piglets)
Chickens
886
ANIMAL UNITS
(Based on MPCA Regulations)
303.3 Animal Units
5,333
74
Animal Units
These calculations are approximate and reflect the maximum
utilization of the proposed agricultural bUildings.
Regardless of whether or not the city uses the term "animal" or
"animal units", Mr. Glatt would be required to obtain a Special
Use Permit for the operation under Section 4 of Ordinance 57.
COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. The Andover City Council may direct staff to
prepare an amendment to Ordinance 8 that removes the term
"animal" and replaces it with "animal units" and refer the
matter to the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission.
2. The Andover City Council may table the request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council table the request, since
the applicant will be required to obtain a Special Use Permit for
the feedlot operation per Ordinance 57, Section 4. Also, the
staff believes that the proposed request could be come an
enforcement problem for the City.
o
""~"'U"_'-_~,~=~__ ___ _......__..... ~. d'_ ...._...
1 , I
I I . " , I I
I . I "
I " " I , i "
I "
" " I ! I u i i ! ! " I I i
I I g " ! I i
1 i ~ I ,
, , ,
" "
~ I j
o
:::J
1 r _
CITY OF ,OAK GROVE. ANO~)A CO. ~
. . - ....
.."Y
; ,,1'1'\'
~~i
: -1- :,. .;?
-1'7 __ ~I--:
~IIII i:t.l:J'
o
:~u::~
- /~?
;,.,.-. - ~'<"q.;. I -4
Jl f'l,7 7Y'"~: ~51~:~ ~ .__ ~~O~
Plllr:-.L'...-'/Y :1\: - '-11-- ___n_;-- ,f, '//0
I '-:j/-;-'~' , ,.:.....;:, '''.-oov<' . . .j,,:,\.2 . ~~--
:((2. -_. <, _, '. ,~. " ',C'
I ;S '. : ; if AI",,";' '1' \.: ~!~":~-:- . >~ --
~'W Y W ~. "if, :'i' .' . k,OGE:. i\ "'" "'::c.
-- ,~'..., ;..::' 't-f-:!'. EA$';::- . ./,.:
, . .... . . .' --:- . .!, 'F t;i rr
.~__ __ "'11. .:. . j; . \ . " . . . I . '.' ,5 FL.:
-LIR II ~. :, I'" .,. 'Of< .\
+' I ,,-,,~:";m' 1,'1.:1'
'I ' . r I .J.' ~:L:... ,:j' C,,\ $ , IVY. I-'; " :
- , . . ~';."I'- ,,-:. I" . . .'h .
I .-~-~-~'~~'\'\'I"I;" ;!\~:\;.', ,'~~'--: 1 -~-\
I:. . . L',,",,, . "" . , r. f:'t:= _ ,
H- I':' ~!I".,]'~ 41' .,..2fj. ,! ' , r--:\J...
. .: __ ___ _ '__m~_~_ _~.:j_..I; ~,I :\:t: . .::_ 'A'. ~ . ~,:J '.. ~
~' -~---~- \-I---,m:-- ~_ -'::-- ~: ; : II 0/../1 .
. ~] -,-- _________1 c--!~--~-l~:-:~,!n' ~; : ,~__~!u I :~::;:-;:-~r'~*~ -,-m,:-il~~:.:~ 'f---~~r:.~?-- ~.
;,-r= I . I ,. I . G<~~ . :f 9I(1f!J.J;. '~'. I 1,,_; I
. I', . ~'Ar s . .,Io/; To $. I ','. .--,--- I
.~' . . . ,.., -' . --'--'- I . I ','. 1
1-;\ ./ . <""1""'.1 ." . '!'L:I ./ 'KII:OU-" j :.. I "'" I I I
:-'-.. i" I
. 1, '4" ij'JlEAf!OW$ :r1;1 . IJO'O/T!O s.'... ',',
I Iii ; ,. i. "'.I'~~Rqj<f"1'. I II : ....{.
I '8111 , 'drAml3';fl,,' . ~\' I" [11 'i i-;' ---,...........1_,:...._. I ~-
i : ~III I :kU.J..: . ,-. ~ ! II ~"1 '
'II i I I .....;:,.~.\, ;~I'::;'r-;-I ' __ -- --,-- 1-_
~ . . - .... ." I I ,--
\ \ Ir- 1\ ~" "=;-';, ;tf~~~llr-' f- j) --'-I"cc'":-_,,,,,,~.,""__
:: I '\ ~N ~ ;'1' ~~I~ --..---'.....,~
-- ~,.::V[ u: \~~ I rV w'-=. [-1 !"
. Te- ~':~' ~ ,l{1~ TIP . _ l, i ~_~.
= - ~ pit . . I U ULJ q H_ U- _I I 1 I
~~~;.~C~'-_.,_.. T"B~~,:~~i i--lt,q-+-
l : n ,I ;1"" .,. "'" -1m ______ " ~ 11
-. -1--1 , I I---"'~ ---- ""'-"'- I
~ ~ Q. : ] ! _ I \f : - - : "'" i ~ _t-
~ ' ~,2,'.7 :1:.L' I R I 1'.......:..uJ. =-.<;""! ;1 _:0. ~~-,--iIR:T--I.;f
...( ~, t- "~'~l~'! 1~1r,g-: I ~~ ,,~ ~
'f/{t:R~V~ '?~. . ...., . .. I "~I . '.
~'Y.f' 1tfj'8 "f~ _________1,_),:: ___'_,_ ___,. +_.
~ .T. ." 1- 'r~): · 1 I ..... I
V, . . . . ~ . -' -;..! .t --L---- :~ ~FY I' "'-L
, , . . '!:l"fh...I- , l-lTTrr ALL ____, :,__ ---J~'~
;u -- '. __, '- 'i;'" ..,. : .':
.~" ,...!-.e, . , 1
\.'.". "'-:-1' i' l '. h
. ,,~~"'. y
" ~ .,..'4 ~~:/'I'
-:--- I ."F".I
I U~y, .
~ ' 'l'~~7:= :: R-4:;I!;':.:.:::...., - '/'i'
Ii' I ~*,-:"'" ~ . .."'1' . -',) j !, ,r'
o. ,~~6,!..' . I : - ;:, ~ . . .
. I ';';f,..h~.. .:' ':;;Ii, R-ktil ' I=L -,,' li,'~
I I~~.:,~~~. A:: 'III n- I' I I I :1 ~\-" ^~ I
~
/' /
LUj ~('r,/,V
I ~''I/
iO
-~
/~
ORDINANCE NO. 57
-~
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
THE AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION OR.
DINANCE, PROMOTING THE HEALTH. SAFETY
AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF
THE CITY OF ANDOVER, COUNTY OF ANOKA.
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
1. LEGISLATIVE INTENT AND FINDINGS OF
FACT
The governing body does hereby find that land
lying outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area
of the City of Andover for which the logical and
proper use is agriculture is threatened by rapid
expanding growth and. urban development. The
governing body further finds that urban develop'
ment must be accommodated in a logical and orderly
fashion in order to minimize the conflids between
urban and agricultural uses. The governing bOdy
further finds that the development and urbanization
of high.quality agricultural land is detrimental to the
long-range development plan of the City of Andover.
It is the purpose of tnls ordinance to identify and
classify such lands outside of the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area of the City of Andover for which the
logical and proper long-term use is agriculture and
to preserve and protect said agricultural land from
unnecessary encroachment by non-agricultural uses
pursuant to Minnesota Statute473H.
2. DEFINITIONS
A. Accessory Structure: A structure or portion.of
a structure subordinate to and serving the principal
use or structure on the same lot and customarily
incidental ttlereto.
b. Building: Any structure having a roof which
may provide shelter or enclosure of persons, animals
or canle and when said structures are divided by
party walls without openings, any portion of such
building so separated shall be deemed a separate
building.
c. Capital Improvement Program: An itemized
program for a five-year prospective period, subject
to at least biennial review. setting forth the schedule.
timing and details of specific contemplated publiC
improvements by year. together with their
estimated cost, the need for each improvement,
financial sources. and the financial impact lhat lhe
improvements will have on the local governmental
u
d. Commercial Agriculture: The use of land for
the growing and/or production of field crops,
livestock. and livestock products for the prOduction
of income including but not limited to the following:
1. field crops, including: Barley, soy beans, corn.
hay, oals, potatoes, rye, sorghum and sunflowers
and vegelables.
2. livestock, including: Dairy and beef cattle,
goats, horses. sheep, hogs, poultry, game birds and
other animals including ponies, deer, rabbits. and
mink.
3. livestock products, including: milk. bU~
cheese, eggs. meat, fur and honey.
e. I~y r"'lan: A plan
adopted by a local governmental unit describing.
designating and scheduling the areas to be sewered
by the public system, the existing and planned
capacities of the public system, the standardS and
conditions under whiCh the installation of private
sewer systems will be permitted, and to the extent
practicable, the areas not suitable for public or
private systems because of public health. safety and
welfare considerations.
f. Drainage System: Any natural or artificial
feature or structure used for the conveyance,
drainage, or storage of surface and/or underground
water, including. but not limited to, streams. rivers.
creeks. ditches. channels, conduits, gulleys, ravines,
washes, lakes or ponds and structures SUCh as
culverts, drainage tile, dams, bridges and water
storage basins.
g. Driveway: A private road or path for vehicle
access to a pUblic road. which is wholly located on
the parcel which is afforded access.
h. Dwelling Unit: A residential buiding or portion
thereof intended for occupancy by a family bul not
including, hotels, motels. boarding or rooming
nouses. tourist homes or trailers.
I. Farm: Real property used for commercial
agriculture or horticulture comprising at least 40
acres of either contiguous or non.conliguous
acreage, all of which is owned and operated by a
single family, family corporation, individual or
corporation. Separate parcels must meet the
minimum size requirements set out in Minnesota
'\
)
c
Statutes, 47JH.03. Subdivision 2. I.e.. ten acres.
i. Farm Building: Any building or accessory
structure other than a farm or non-farm dwelling
which is used in a farming operation. including, but
not limited to. a barn. granary, silo. farm implement
tQr.~a4Lbuild!ng or milk house.
k. FeedlOt-: -An-a?eawnere1'S
domestic animals are confined.
IS one I e: rue re 0 area 0 an or water
of historic, archeological, paleontological or ar.
chitet:tural value which has been designated as an
historic site in the Federal Register of historical
landmarks, the Minnesota Historical SOCiety, or by a
local governmental unit.
m. Home Occupation: Any gainful occupation or
profession engaged in by the occupant of a dwelling
at or from the-dwelling when carried on within a
dwelling unit and not in an accessory building pro-
vided that no signs other than those normally utilized
in residential districts are present. no stock in trade
is stored on the premises, over-the-counter retail
sales are not involved. and entrance to the home oc-
cupation is gained from within the structure.
n. Horticulture; The use of land for the growing or
production for income of fruits, vegetables, flowers,
nursery stock, including ornamental plants and
trees, and cultured sod.
o. Irrigation System: Any structure or equipment,
mechanized or other, used to supply water for
commercial agriculture or horticulture, including,
but not limited to, wells. pumps. motors. pipes.
culverts, gates. dams, ditches, tanks, ponds. and
reservoirs.
p. Parcel: A separate area of land, inclUding a lot,
having speCific bOundaries and capable of being
conveyed and recorded.
q. Quarter Quarter Section: The northeast. nor.
thwest. southwest or southeast quarter of a quarter
section delineated by the United States Government
system of land survey and which is exactly or nearly
40 acres in size.
r. Relative: Father. mother, spouse, brother.
sister, son, daugh1er, son. in. law. daughter-in.law.
s. Road: A public thoroughfare, including without
limitation streets, highways, freeways, parkways,
thoroughfares, roads. avenues. boulevards. lanes. or
places, however described: but not including private
driveways or routes.
t. Structure: Anything erected. the use of which
requires more or less permanent location on the
ground, or attached to something having a per.
manent location on the ground. This shall include
signs.
u. All other definitions contained in the Andover
City Zoning Ordinance shall also be applicable tothis
Ordinance.
3. DESIGNATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF
DISTRICT
a. The following zoning district together with the
applicable requirements contained herein is hereby
established as a part of the loning ordinance of the
City of Andover:
AgP Agricultural Preservation District
b. The locations and boundaries of the district
established by this ordinance shall be set forth on the
zoning map of this city and said map is hereby made
a part of this ordinance. Said map consisting of
sheets, and all notations, references and data shown
thereon is hereby incorporated by reference into this
ordinance and shall be made as much a part ot it as if
all were full described herein. The zoning map Shall
be kept on file in the zoning administrator's office.
4. AgP AGRICULTURE PRESERVATION
DISTRICT
a. Intent:
This district is intended to contain those areas of
Andover where it is necessary and desirable.
because of the high quality ot the soils, availability of
water, and/or highly productive agricultural
capability to preserve, promote, maintain. and
enhance the use of the land for agricultural purposes
and to protect such land from encroachment by non.
agricultural uses, structures or activities.
b. Permitted Uses and Structures:
The following uses shall be permitted by right:
1. commercial agriculture and horticulture
2. farm buildings
3. farm drainage and irrigation systems
4. forestry
5. permanent single family dwelling units which
do not exceed a density of one per quarter quarter
section
(a) the single family dwelling unit shall be located
on a separate parcel which is at least two and one-
half acres in size
(b) the parcel on which the single family dwelling
unit is located must have at least 300 feet of frontage
along a road which has been accepted and is
maintained by the city.
{cl the driveway serving the parcel shall be
separated from adjacent driveways on the same side
of the road by the following distances depending
upon road types.
(1) local road: 100 feet
(2) collector road: JOOfeet
(3) minor arterial: 500 feet
(4) minimum distance from intersection of two or
moreol the above: 100 feet
(d) the single family dwelling unit shall be set
back at least 75 feet from the- road right.ot-way
6. historic sites
c. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures
The following accessory uses and structures shall
be perm itted.
1. Uses and structures which are customarily
accessory and clearly incidental and subordinate to
permitted uses and structures, including:
(a) Private garages
(b) Playhouses. swimming pools and storage
buildings appurtenant to single family dwellings
(c) L.andscaping items
(d) Dwelling units which are temporarily oc-
cupied by seasonal workers who are employed on the
agricultural property where they are located. Such
dwelling units shall not be occupied during the time
that the agricultural property is not being actively
farmed.
d. SpeCial Uses
. The following special uses may be approved by the
City of Andover in the AgP Agricultural Preser.
vation District provided that the provisions and
requirements of Section 4. E (Standards for Granting
Special Use Permits) of the zoning ordinance are
fulfilled: -.L
1. Feedlot and Doultry facilities -J\
2. Agricultural service establishments primarily
engaged in performing agricultural animal
husbandry or horticultural services on a fee or
conlract basis including but not limited to. corn
shelling. hay baling and threshing; sorting, grading
and packing fruits and vegetables for the grower;
agricultural produce milling and processing; hor-
ticultural services; crop dusting; fruit picking;
grain Cleaning; land grading; harvesting and
plowing: farm equipment service and repair;
veterinary services; and roadside stands utilizing
permanent structures for the sale of agricultural
produce grown on the site.
3. Public utility and publiC service structures
including electric transmission and distribution
lines, substations, gas regulator stations. com.
munications equipment buildings. pumping stations
and reservoirs.
4. Home occupations.
e. Standards for Granting Special Use Permits
No special use permit shall be issued by the City of
Andover unless following review and written fin-
dings it determines that the proposed use satisfies
the following conditions:
1. The use shall not be one to which the noise. odor.
dust, or chemical residues of commercial
agriculture or horticulture might result in creation
or establishment of a nuisance or trespass.
2. All agricultural service establishments shall be
located at least 300 feet from any driveway affording
access to a farm dwelling and at leasl 500 feet from
any single family dwelling..
3. All agricultural service establishments may
require screening from the public view on the
perimeter of the establishment by a solid fence, wall.
or natural vegetation of not less than a feet in height.
4. An agricultural service establishment shall be
incidental and necessary to the conduct of
agriculture within the district.
5. Public utility and service structures shall be
located and construction at such places and in such
manner that they will minimize segmenting land of
anyone farm and will not interfere with the conduct
of agriculture by limiting or interfering with the
access to lields or the effectiveness and efficiency of
the farmer and farm equipment including crop
spraying aircraft.
f. Prohibited Uses and Structures
All other uses and structures which are not
specifically permitted by right or by special use
permit shall be prohibited in the AgP Agricultural
Preservation District.
g. Minimum Lot Sizes, Yard Requirements and
Structure Spacings:
Shall be as set forth for the R-l zoning district
under the Andover City Zoning Ordinance.
h. Whenever property is zoned for AgP within the
Ordinance No.8, Section
SECTION 7. USES.
o
7.01 Permitted Uses
Within any of the following districts, no structure or land shall
be used except for one (1) or more of the uses listed by district:
(8ww, 10-6-87)
PERMITTED USES IN ALL DISTRICTS
Public utility uses for local service when located
within public right-of-way. All other public utility
uses require a special use permit.
Public and private forests and wild life reservations
and public parks.
Public owned and operated property except as herein
amended.
Public elementary, junior and senior high schools.
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS:
R-1 Single Family Rural District
Agricultural Uses.
~
Any site which has more than five (5) non-domestic
animals per acre shall require a special use permit.
Single family residential structures.
R-2 Single Family Estate District
Urban Agricultural uses.
Single family residential buildings.
R-3 Single Family Suburban District
Urban Agricultural uses.
Single family residential buildings.
Private sewer and water systems shall only be
permitted on every other lot or no more frequently
than one private system for each 40,000 sq. ft.
where large lots are established. This shall not
apply to lots of record at the time this Ordinance
is adopted. On each new plat, the lots are to be
developed in accord~~~~ with this section and shall
be so designated.--
R-4 Single Family Urban District
, .
o
Urban Agricultural Uses.
Single family residential buildings.
Page 45
Ordinance No.8, Section 3.02, Je.A",-h",<s
(0
Animals, Domestic: Animals commonly kept for pets, such as
dogs, cats and similar animals. (8A, 2-14-75)
{Animals, Non-domestic: Animals and poultry commonly kept for
productive purposes on a farm such as cattle, hogs, sheep,
goats, chickens, and other similar animals. (8A, 2-14-75)
Animals, Pleasure-Recreational: Animals not normally kept in
a residence such as horses, ponies, foals, donkeys, burrows,
mules or others. (8A, 2-14-75)
Apartment: A room or suite of rooms with cooking facilities
which is occupied and normally rented as a residence by a
single family. Shall include buildings with two, three or
more dwelling units and efficiency units. (8BB, 4-2-85)
Auto Reduction Yard: A lot or yard where two (2) or more
unlicensed motor vehicles or the remains thereof are kept for
the purpose of dismantling, sale of parts, sale as scrap,
storage, or abandonment.
(
Basement: A portion of a building located partly underground
but having less than half its floor-to-ceiling height below
the average grade of the adjoining ground.
Boarding House (Rooming or Lodging House): A building other
than a motel or hotel where, for compensation and by
prearrangement for definite periods, meals, or lodgings are
provided for three (3) or more persons, but not to exceed
eight (8) persons.
Building: Any structure having a roof which may provide
shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or chattel and when
said structures are divided by party walls without openings,
each portion or such building so separated shall be deemed a
separate building.
Building Height: A distance to be measured from the mean
curb level along the front lot line or from the mean ground
level for all of that portion of the structure having
frontage on a public right-of-way, whichever is higher, to
the top of the cornice of a flat roof, to a point on the roof
directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the
uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the
mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof.
Business: Any occupation, employment or enterprise wherein
merchandise is exhibited or sold, or which occupies time,
attention, labor and materials, or where services are offered
for compensation.
Carport: An automobile shelter having one (1) or more sides
open.
'0
Cellar: That portion of the building having more than one-
half (1/2) of the floor-to-ceiling height below the average
grade of the adjoining ground.
Church: A building, together with its accessory buildings
and uses, where persons regularly assemble for religious
worship and which building, together with its accessory
page 4
7020,0100 ANIMAL FEEDLOTS
.0
CHAPTER 7020
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
WATER QUALITY DIVISION
ANIMAL FEEDLOTS
7020.0100 PREAMBLE.
7020.0200 SCOPE.
7020.0300 DEfiNITIONS.
7020.lJ.l00 ANIMAL fl,EDI.OT POLLUTION
CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
7020.0~OO PERMIT I'ROCEDURES.
7020.06110 I,XISTING PERMITS FOR TilE
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF
IJVESTO<'" HEDI.OTS. POULTRY
FEEDLOTS. AND OTIIER ANIMAL
I.OTS.
7020.0700 PROCEDURAL RULES AND APPEALS.
7020.0800 SEVERABILITY.
7020,0900 VARIANCE.
PROCESSING OF ANIMAL FEEDI.OT PERMIT
APPLICATIONS BY COUNTIES
7020.1500 SCOPE.
7020.1600 COUNTY PROCESSING PROCEDURE
fOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT PERMIT
APPLlC A nONS.
7020.1700 PROCEDURAL RULES AND APPEALS.
7020,1800 SEVERABILITY.
7020.1900 VARIANCES.
.0
7020.0100 PREAMBLE.
An adequate supply of healthy livestock, poultry, and other animals is
essential to the well-being of' Minnesota citizens and the nation. These
domesticated animals provide our daily source of meat, milk, eggs, and fiber.
Their efficient, economic p'roduction must be the concern of all consumers if we
are to have a continued abundance of high-quality, wholesome food and fiber at
reasonable prices.
However, livestock, poultry, and other animals produce manure which may,
when improperly stored, transported, or disposed, negatively affect Minnesota's
environment. When animal manure adds to air, water, or land pollution in the
state of Minnesota, it must be controlled.
The following rules for the control of livestock, poultry, and other animal
manures have been promulgated to provide protection against pollution caused
by manure from domesticated animals. However, these rules recognize that
animal manure often provides beneficial qualities to the soil and to the
production of agricultural crops.
These rules provide for a cooperative program between counties and the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (hereinafter agency). County programs, in
many instances, represent considerable experience and sensitivity to local
agricultural practices and to successful soil and water conservation. Pollution
control measures, where deemed necessary by the agency, should be individually
designed and developed to provide the site specific controls needed for the
operation in question. Therefore, a joint county-state program is desirable
because it will insure local involvement, minimal disruption to agricultural
operations and protect the environment from further degradation.
These rules comply with the policy and purpose of the state of Minnesota in
regard to the control of pollution as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, chapters liS
and 116. Specifically, these rules are promulgated in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, sections 116.07 and 115.03. Finally, these rules shall have the force
and effect of law and shall supersede and replace Minnesota Rules SW 5.1 to 55
.____._(_\.-9-11) and Minnesota Rules SW 56 to 61 (1974) 20 days after their publication in
the State Register.
In repealing the old rules controlling pollution from animal feedlots,
specifically Minnesota Rule 54 containing certain location requirements, the
agency will look to local units of government to provide adequate land use
planning for residential and agricultural areas. It has been the agency's
experience that residential and agricultural uses of land are often incompatible
and that the best forum for resolving the conflicting use of land is at the local
..:~:
-;::""
1
o
o
ANIMAL FEEDLOTS 7020.0300
level. However, in promulgating these rules the agency does not seck to
abdicate its mandate to protect the purity of the natural resources of the state of
Minnesota.
Statutory Authority: MS s J /6.07 subJ 7
7020.0200 SCOPE.
The provisions of parts 7020.0200 to 7020.0900 govern the storage,
transportation. disposal, and utilization of animal manure and the application for
and issuance of permits and certificates of compliance for construction and
operation of animal manure management and disposal or utilization systems for
the protection of the environment.
Statutory Authority: MS s //6.07 subJ 7
7020.0300 DEFINITIONS.
Subpart I. Scopc. All terms employed in these animal feedlot rules for
which definitions are given in Minnesota Statutes, sections 115.07 and 116,06,
shall have the meaning ascribed to them therein. The terms specified in this
part shall have the meanings ascribed to them.
Subp. 2. Agcncy. "Agency" means the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency as established in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 116.
Subp. 3. Animal feedlot. "Animal fcedlot" means a lot or building or
combination of lots and buildings intended for the confined feeding, breeding,
raising, or holding of animals and specifically designed as a confinement area in
which manure may accumulate. or where the concentration of animals is such
that a vegetative cover cannot be maintained within the enclosure. For purposes
of these parts, open lots used for the feeding and rearing of poultry (poultry
ranges) shall be considered to be animal feedlots. Pastures shall not be
ccnsidered animal feedlots under these parts.
Subp. 4. Animal manure. "Animal manure" means poultry, livestock, or
other animal excreta or a mixture of excreta with feed, bedding, or other
materials.
Subp. 5. Animal unit. "Animal unit" means a unit of measure used to
compare differences in the production of animal manures that employs as a
standard the amount of manure produced on a regular basis by a slaughter steer
or heifer. For purposes of parts 7020,0200 to 7020.0900, the following
equivalents shall apply:
A. one mature dairy cow, 1.4 animal unit;
B. one slaughter steer or heifer, 1,0 animal unit;
C. one horse, 1.0 animal unit;
D. one swine over 55 pounds, 0.4 animal unit;
E. one duck, 0.2 animal unit;
F. one sheep, 0.) animal unit;
G. one swine under 55 pounds, 0,05 animal unit;
H. one turkey, 0.018 animal unit;
.____uI.._one-chicken, 0.01 animal unit.
For animals not listed in items A to I, the number of animal units shalI be
defined as the average weight of the animal divided by 1,000 pounds.
Subp. 6. Certificate of compliancc; "Certificate of compliance" means a
letter from the director or the county feedlot pollution control officer to the
owner of an animal feedlot stating that the feedlot meets agency requirements.
Subp. 7. Change in opcration. "Change in operation" means an increase
beyond the permiUed maximum number of animal units, an increase in the
number of animal units which are confined at an unpermitted animal feedlot
;~ ~,'\
\......-/
I
.
!
I
,
[,
;
Ie
€. <:~\ r
~":":j I
:.:,..;..' t
t
t,
-,;..
f;
,.
.
I
l
r'
f
t
I
1
ct"~'
'. ...,,\
:.:..--'1
2
',0
o
7020.0300 ANIMAL FEEDLOTS
requiring a construction investment, or a change in the construction operation of
an animal feedlot that would affect the storage, handling, utilization, or disposal
of animal manure.
Subp. 8. Corrective or protective measure. "Corrective or protective
measure" means a practice, structure, condition, or combination thereof which
prevents or reduces the discharge of pollutants from an animal feedlot to a level
in conformity with agency rules.
Subp. 9. County feedlot pollution control officer. "County feedlot pollution
control officer" means a county employee or officer who is knowledgeable in
agriculture and who is designated by the county board to receive and process
animal feedlot permit applications.
Subp. 10. Director. "Director" means the executive director of the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency whose duties are defined in Minnesota
Statutes, section 116.03.
Subp. II. Domestic fertilizer. "Domestic fertilizer" means:
A. animal manure that is put on or injected into the soil to improve
the quality or quantity of plant growth; or
n. animal manure that is used as compost, soil conditioners, or
specialized plant beds.
Subp, 12. Floodplain. "Floodplain" means the areas adjoining a
watercourse which have been or hereafter may be covered by a large flood
known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of
what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the
100 year recurrence interval.
Subp. 13. Interim permit. "Interim permit" means a permit issued by the
director or the county feedlot pollution control officer which expires no longer
than ten months from the date of issue.
Subp. 14. Manure storage area. "Manure storage area" means an area
associated with an animal feedlot where animal manure or runoff containing
animal manure is stored until it can be utilized as domestic fertilizer or removed
to a permitted animal manure disposal site. Animal manure packs or mounding
within the animal feedlot shall not be considered to be manure storage for these
parts.
Subp. 15. New animal feedlot. "New animal feedlot" means an animal
feedlot constructed and operated at a site where no animal feedlot existed
previously or where a pre-existing animal feedlot has been abandoned or unused
for a period of five years or more.
Subp. 16. - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit. "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit"
means a permit issued by the agency for the purpose of regulating the discharge
of pollutants from point sources including concentrated animal feeding
operations.
Subp. 17. Owner. "Owner", means all persons having possession, control,
or title to an animal feedlot.
Subp. 18. Pastures. "Pastures" means areas where grass or other grO\ying
plants are used for grazing and where the concentration of animals is such that a
vegetation cover is maintained during the growing season except in the
immediate vicinity of temporary supplemeniaJ(eecfing or watering devices.
Subp. 19. Permit. "Permit" means a document issued by the agency, at no
charge to the applicant, which contains requirements, conditions, and compliance
schedules relating to the discharge of animal manure pollutants.
Subp. 20. Potential pollution hazard. "Potential pollution hazard" means a
condition which indicates a potential for pollution of the land or waters of the
state including:
,
t.
3
ANIMAL FEEDLOTS 7020.0500
o
A. an animal feedlot or manure storage area whose boundaries are
located within shoreland or floodplain. or are located in an area draining directly
to a sinkhole or draining to an area with shallow soils overlying a fractured or
cavernous rock, or are located within 100 feet of a water well; or
B. an animal feedlot or manure storage area whose construction or
operation will allow a discharge of pollutants to surface waters of the state in
excess of applicable standards, including, but not limited to, chapters 7050 and
. 7055, during a rainstorm event of less magnitude than the 25-year, 24-hour event,
or will allow uncontrolled seepage of pollutants into the ground water, or will
violate any applicable state rules.
Subp. 21. Shore land. "Shoreland" means land located within the following
distances from the ordinary high water elevation of public waters:
A. land within 1,000 feet from the normal high water mark of a lake,
pond, or flowage; and
B. land within 300 feet of a river or stream or the landward side of
floodplain delineated by ordinance on such a river or stream, whichever is
greater.
Subp. 22. Sinkhole. "Sinkhole" means a surface depression which is
connected to a cavernous bedrock (generally limestone) by a channel or collapse
of the overlying formation.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
7020.0400 ANIMAL FEEDLOT POLLUTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
Subpart I. In general. No animal feedlot or manure storage area shall be
constructed, located, or operated so as to create or maintain a potential pollution
hazard unless a certificate of compliance or an agency permit has been issued.
Subp. 2. Vehicles, spreaders. All vehicles used to transport animal manure
on county, state, and interstate highways or through municipalities shall be
leakproof. Manure spreaders with endgates shall be in compliance with this
provision provided the endgate works effectively to restrict leakage and the
manure spreader is leakproof. This shall not apply to animal manure being
hauled to fields adjacent to feedlot operations or fields divided by roadways
provided the animal manure is for use as domestic fertilizer.
Subp. 3. Manure storage. Animal manure, when utilized as domestic
fertilizer, shall not be stored for longer than one year and shall be applied at
rates not exceeding local agricultural crop nutrient requirements except where
allowed by permit. Local agricultural crop nutrient requirements can be
obtained at local Soil Conservation Service offices or local Agricultural Extension
Service offices. .
Subp. 4. Animal manure. Any animal manure not utilized as domestic
fertilizer shall be treated or disposed of in accordance with applicable state rules.
Subp. 5. Owner's duties, The owner of any animal feedlot shall be
responsible for the storage, transportation, and disposal of all animal manure
generated in a manner consistent with the provisions herein.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
7020.0500 PERMIT PROCEDURES.
Subpart I. Application. The own~r of a proposed or existing animal--'----
feedlot for greater than ten animal units shall make application to the director
for a permit when any of the following conditions exist:
A. a new animal feedlot is proposed;
B. a change in operation of an existing animal feedlot is proposed;
C. ownership of an existing animal feedlot is changed; or
D, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit application is required under state or federal rules and regulations,
o
4
,
f,
!$'
~.
r"
/::,
(20
>:...~.
@:
~.
CD
7020.0500 ANIMAL FEEDLOTS
o
Subpart la. Potential pollution hazard. The owner of any animal Feedlot
shall be required to make an application For a permit when an inspection by the
agency staff or a county Feedlot pollution control oFFicer determines that the
animal Feedlot creates or maintains a potential pollution hazard.
Suhp. 2. Contents of application. The permit application shall include the
following items:
A. A completed permit application form listing all owners and signed
by at least one of the owners, including animal types, the maximum number of
animals of each type which can be conFined at the animal feedlot, the location of
the animal feedlot, soil conditions, and hydrogeological conditions.
B. A map or aerial photograph showing the location of all wells,
buildings, lakes, and watercourses within 1,000 feet of the proposed feedlot.
C. A manure management plan including manure handling and
application techniques, acreage available for manure application, and plans for
any proposed manure storage structure. Any plans For manure storage
structures of 500,000 gallons capacity or larger shall have been prepared or
approved by a registered professional engineer or a soil conversation service
employee.
D. Such additional information relating to the specific site or the
specific feedlot operation as may be requested by the director to evaluate
compliance with federal and state rules.
Subp. 3. More than one owner. When more than one' person is in
possession, control, or has title to a single animal feedlot, only one person needs
to apply for an animal feedlot permit; however, the permit application must list
all owners in accordance with subpart 2, item A, All owners are responsible for
compliance with these parts and permits or certificates of compliance issued
pursuant to these parts.
Subp. 4. Application review. The animal feedlot permit application shall
be reviewed by the county feedlot pollution control officer or by the director if a
county permit processing program has not been implemented in the county
where the animal feedlot will be located.
A. No permit shall be required when the review of the application
indicates that all animal manures are being used as domestic fertilizer and that a
potential pollution hazard does not exist or that potential pollution hazards have
been satisfactorily addressed by corrective or protective measures. . However, a
certificate of compliance shall be obtained by the owner of such an animal
feedlot prior to commencing operation of the new feedlot, changing the operation
of an existing feedlot, or changing ownership of an existing feedlot.
B. The agency shall consider the issuance of a permit when the review
indicates that a potential pollution hazard exists and has not been addressed by
corrective or protective measures or when manure is not being used as a
domestic fertilizer.
(I) An interim permit shall be issued by the director when the
potential pollution hazard will be corrected within ten months of the date of
permit issuance. When all necessary corrective and protective measures-liave--
been installed on a permitted animal feedlot, the permit shall terminate and a
certificate of compliance shall be issued.
(2) An animal feedlot permit may be issued by the agency when the
potential pollution hazard will not be corrected within ten months of the date of
permit issuance or when manure is not used as a domestic fertilizer. This
permit shall contain such conditions and requirements as the agency deems
necessary in order to insure compliance with applicable state rules.
,
f
l
l
.
,
I
r
I:
~
i.
[
t
I:
V
r:
t::
....-
;...~.
~
i'
"
~
;.
~
[
I
I
f
o
5
ANIMAL FEEDLOTS 7020.1500
o
(3) If it is determined during the review process that an animal
feedlot must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit, the applicant shall be notified and a permit shall be processed and issued
as prescribed in chapter 7070.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
7020.0600 EXISTING PERMITS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF LIVESTOCK FEEDLOTS, POULTRY FEEDLOTS, AND
OTHER ANIMAL LOTS.
The conditions and provisions of all agency animal feedlot permits issued
under Minnesota rules SW 51 to 61 before the effective date of parts 7020.0200
to 7020.0900 shall continue to be in effect. Upon application for a change in
operation or change of ownership of an existing, permitted animal feedlot, the
permit shall be reconsidered pursuant to these parts.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
Nole: Minn(~'a Rules SW Silo 61 hIVe been repealed.
7020.0700 PROCEDURAL RULES AND APPEALS.
All requests for hearings, appeals, and other procedural mallers not
specifically provided for herein shall be governed by the agency rules of
procedure, the rules of the Office of Administrative Hearings, and other
applicable statutes and rules.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
7020.0800 SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of parts 7020.0200 to 7020.0900 or the application thereof to
any person or circumstances is held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect
other provisions of parts 7020,0200 to 7020.0900 or application of any other part
which can be given effect without application of the invalid provision. To this
end the provisions of all parts and subparts herein and the various applications
thereof are declared to be severable.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
7020.0900 VARIANCE.
Any person may apply for a variance from any requirements of parts
7020.0200 to 7020.0900. Such variances shall be applied for and acted upon by
the agency in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section 116.07, subdivision 5
and other applicable statutes and rules.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
PROCESSING OF ANIMAL FEEDLOT PERMIT APPLICATIONS BY
COUNTIES
o
7020.1500 SCOPE.
Any Minnesota county board may, by resolution, assume responsibility for
processing applications for animal feedlot permits as authorized by Minnesota
Statutes, section 116.07, subdivision 7. The provisions of parts 7020.1500 to
7020,1900 shall govern the exercise of approval and supervising authority by the
agency with respect to the processing of animal feedlot permit applications by a
county.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
6
<"'-"
/"",....
v-'.'.
\~';_.- :.;
;".;.=;1
f
,
,
f
I
r,
i
i
~
i
,
I
~.
,
i
;
l
~
..____n___ r
f
i
I
,
I
..' ~.
(;~S')
o
'.,0
7020.1600 ANIMAL FEEDLOTS
7020.1600 COUNTY PROCESSING PROCEDURE FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT
PERMIT APPLICATIONS.
Subpart 1. Duties of county board. Any Minnesota county board desiring
to assume responsibility for processing animal feedlot permit applications shall:
A, Submit to the director a resolution duly adopted by the county
board requesting permission to process animal feedlot permit applications in the
county, Such resolution shall be accompanied by a statement describing the
permit application processing procedure to be used by the county.
B. Receive written approval from the agency authorizing the
processing of animal feedlot permit applications within the county.
C. Designate a county feedlot pollution control officer as having the
primary responsibility for the animal feedlot permit program and charge him
with the following duties:
(I) distribute permit application forms made available by the
director to those required to make application for the permit;
(2) provide, where requested, assistance to applicants to' ensure that
application forms are properly completed;
(3) receive and review completed application forms and conduct
such inspections as necessary to determine if' the proposed animal feedlot will
comply with applicable state rules and applicable local ordinances; and
(4) maintain a record of all correspondence and material relating to
animal feedlot applications, certificates of compliance, and interim permits issued
by the county. .
Subp. 2. Procedures. The processing of applications for animal feedlot
permits by a county board, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 116.07,
subdivision 7, clauses (a), (b), and (c), shall be accomplished according to the
following procedure:
A. For animal feedlots with less than 1,000 animal units where manure
is used as a domestic fertilizer and with no potential pollution hazard, the county
feedlot pollution control officer shall provide a certificate of compliance to the
agency and the applicant stating that the animal feedlots comply with all aspects
of parts 7020.0200 to 7020.0900 and that no animal feedlot permit is required.
B. For animal feedlots of less than 300 animal units where manure is
used as a domestic fertilizer and where all potential pollution hazards have been
mitigated by protective or corrective measures the county feedlot pollution
control officer shall provide a certificate of compliance to the agency and to the
applicant stating that the animal feedlots comply with parts 7020.0200 to
7020.0900 and that no animal feedlot permit is required.
. C. The county feedlot pollution control officer shall forward to the
director, with recommendations and comments, all animal feedlot permit
applications which fall within the following categories:
(I) animal feedlots of 1,000 animal units or more;
(2) animal feedlots of more than 300 animal units where a potential
pollution hazard has been mitigated through corrective or protective measures;
(3) animal feedlots with a potential pollution hazard which has not
been mitigated by corrective or protective measures;
(4) animal feedlots where manure is not used as domestic fertilizer;
;.
or
, (5) animal feedlots for which further technical review is desired by
the county feedlot pollution control officer.
Subp. 3. Interim permits. Any county board which has assumed
responsibility for processing feedlot permit applications in accordance with
subpart I, may issue, deny, modify, impose conditions upon, or revoke interim I
permits for animal feedlots smaller than 300 animal units where animal manure
is used as a domestic fertilizer and with a potential pollution hazard which will
7
o
..
o
ANIMAL FEEDLOTS 7020,1600
be mitigated by corrective or prote<:tive measures within ten months of the date
of the issuan<:e of the interim animal feedlot permit. These permits shall be'
issued, denied, modified, have conditions imposed upon them, or revoked in
conformance with the following requirements:
A. In order for the county to issue an interim permit:
(1) The director must receive written notification of the intention of
the county to issue an interim permit. Such notification must include the
completed permit application, a copy of the draft interim permit proposed for
issuance by the county, and documentation concerning the potential pollution
hazard and the corrective or protective measures to be taken by the owner.
(2) The director shall, after receipt of written notification of intent
to issue an interim permit, review the draft interim permit within 15 days to
determine compliance with applicable agency rules and shall approve, suspend,
modify, or reverse the issuance of the interim permit. If the director approves
'. issuance of the interim permit, the interim permit and a certificate for display
shall be returned to the county for issuance to the operator. If the director
suspends, modifies, or reverses the issuance of the interim permit, the applicant
. retains all rights of ilPpeal set out in part 7020.1700. If the director fails to act
within 15 days after receipt of the draft interim permit from the county, the
county may proceed to issue the interim permit.
B. In order for a county to modify or impose conditions upon a
interim permit the county shall notify the director in writing of its. intention to
modify or impose conditions upon an interim animal feedlot permit. Such
notification must include a copy of the interim permit together with the intended
modifications and conditions. The director shall determine compliance with the
provisions of applicable agency rules and shall either approve, suspend, further
modify, or reverse the recommended modification or conditions within 15 days
of receipt of the aforementioned notice of intent. The county shall be notified
of said agency action. The applicant retains all rights of appeal set out in part
7020,1700,
C. In order for a county to revoke an interim permit a copy of the
interim permit together with a written justification for revocation must be
submitted to the director. for review. The director shall, after receipt of the
justification for revocation by the county, review the matter within ]5 days to
determine compliance with the provisions of applicable agency rules. The
county must receive written approval of the interim permit revocation from the
agency prior to taking action. Where a revocation has been approved by the
agency, the applicant must be informed in writing by the county of the reasons
for revocation and the applicant shall retain all rights of appeal set out in part
7020.1700.
D. In the case of a denial of an interim permit application by the
county board, the applicant shall be informed by. the county in writing of the
reasons for denial and shall be informed of applicable appeal procedures. The
applicant shall retain all rights of fundamental fairness afforded by law and the
applicant may make an appeal to the agency to review the county's action.
Such a denial by a_cQ.u_fl_ty2hall be without prejudice to the applicant's right to.
an appearance before the agency to request a public hearing or to file a further
application after revisions are made to meet objections specified as reasons for
denial. The agency shall approve, suspend, modify, or reverse the denial of an
interim permit if the matter has been appealed to the agency.
Subp. 4. Termination of interim permits. If the county has issued an
interim permit, the county feedlot pollution control officer shall terminate the
permit and issue a certificate of compliance when all necessary corrective and
protcctive measures have been installed,
./.~......
(--:.:.'::"
_7_:" :.'
'",=,./
c':.:~
\...,.;i'
8
7020.1600 ANIMAL FEEDLOTS
o
. Subp. 5. Director review. The director shall review within 15 days all
animal feedlot permit applications forwarded by the county and shall notify the
county of the status of the review and of any intended action with respect to all
properly completed animal feedlot permit applications,
Subp. 6, Withdrawal by county from review process. A county no longer
wishing to continue in the application review process shall submit a resolution
slating its reasons for withdrawal and the effective date of withdrawal to the
director.
Subp. 7. Revocation of county review authority. If the agency finds that a
county program is not meeting the requirements of these parts, the agency may,
after giving the county written notice and an opportunity to respond, revoke its
approval of the county's application review authority.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07subd 7
7020.1700 PROCEDURAL RULES AND APPEALS.
All requests for hearings, appeals, and other procedural matters not
specifically provided for herein shall be governed by the agency rules of
procedure, the rules of the Office of Administrative Hearings, and other
applicable statutes and rules.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
7020.1800 SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of parts 7020.1500 to 7020.1900 or the application thereof to
any person or circumstances is held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect
other provisions of parts 7020.1500 to 7020.1900 or application of any other part
which can be given effect without application of the invalid provision. To this
end the provisions of all parts and subparts herein and the various applications
thereof are declared to be severable.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
7020.1900 VARIANCES.
Any person may apply for a variance from any requirements of parts
7020.1500 to 7020.1900. Such variances shall be applied for and acted upon by
the agency in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section 116.07, subdivision 5,
and other applicable statutes and rules.
Statutory Authority: MS s 116.07 subd 7
o
I
!
t.
I
!
;
~.
i
i
l
!
I
,
~.
!
9
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
December 19, 1989
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING
APPROV~OR
AGE
BY:
Jay
ITEM 2. Watts Garden Acres
NO. Sketch Plans/
Comm. Blvd. Ali
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is requested to review and approve the
residential sketch plans for the development in Watt's Garden
Acres and the future alignment of Commercial Boulevard from Hanson
Boulevard to the the proposed Nightengale Street NW.
BACKGROUND
Three development groups have emerged through this process. The
first group is the original Lynwood Estates group that includes
the Mardaus and Hunt properties east of Jay Street. A ~econd
group, including Hurst, Boeke and Wegner (and potentially
Mistelske and Stanton) has also developed. Their development is
known as Whip-O-Whil Estates. The last group would be the
commercial property developers and existing businesses along Jay
Street.
SKETCH PLAN DISCUSSION
The following sketches of the residential property (on yellow
paper) have been submitted for your review:
Overall Development Plan
Sketch A. The Andover Review Committee was directed to compile a
sketch of the Watts Garden Acres area without consideration of
property lines. Sketch A is the original development plan put
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
Page 2
Watt's Garden Acres Sketch plans/
Commercial Blvd. Alignment
December 19, 1989
forth by the Committee. Several concerns have been raised
regarding the usefulness of this sketch. The fact of the matter
is, that there are property owners with different development
ideas and to not consider property lines may not be effective.
Also, portions of the Mardaus, Hurst and Wegner properties might
be better suited as future commercial property (properties to be
located along Hanson Boulevard and Commercial Boulevard).
Note: Sketch A was designed by use of the existing topography,
natural features (existing trees), Ordinance 10 requirements
regarding the future street alignment, and future drainage areas
which may be required as part of the development.
East of Jay street
Sketch B. Lynwood Estates Sketch plan (with the Wegner property)
includes the extension of Hummingbird Street and the creation of
Ibis Street NW (the cul-de-sac from 134th Ave. south to the Hunt
property). The eastern part of the property would remain
commercial along Hanson Boulevard, however, everything west of the
power line easement would be switched to residential. This, too,
is an ARC drawing of what might work for the development.
Note: Sketch B design is acceptable by use of existing
topography, natural features and Ordinance 10 requirements
regarding the future street alignment.
Sketch C. Wegner drawing of Whip-O-Whil Estates and Lynwood
Estates. The Andover Review Committee has a concern that the cul-
de-sac makes the turn to the west forcing the removal of the trees
and significant grading on the Mardaus property. Protection of
the trees is one of the main reasons the City continues to look at
these options on the property. The eastern part of the property
would remain commercial along Hanson Boulevard, however,
everything west of the power line easement would be switched to
residential.
West of Jay Street
Sketch D. Whip-O-Whil Estates (west) drawing submitted by Hurst
and Boeke. The Hurst and Boeke homes are included on this sketch.
The ARC has generally reviewed the sketch and believes that with
minor alterations, the sketch could work well. Some of the
intersections might need to be squared up to create safer traffic
patterns.
o
The Planning and zoning Commission held a
a motion to recommend to the City Council
Band D for the residential development.
from the Planning Commission.
public hearing and made
approval of Sketch
See the enclosed minutes
o
Page 3
Watt's Garden Acres Sketch Plans/
Commercial Blvd. Alignment
December 19, 1989
The Andover Review Committee is concerned with the grading of the
development. Both Stanton and Mistelske will need fill and may
not be ready or willing to develop at this time. Boelke and Hurst
may have enough material to complete the grading west of Jay
Street.
Property owners/developers are required to meet all requirements
of Ordinances 8 and 10.
COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD DISCUSSION
The future alignment of Commercial Boulevard will in some form,
control the development of the Watts Garden Acres area. The
discussion should center on two different portions of Commercial
boulevard - Hanson Blvd. to Jay st. and Jay St. to Tonson.
Hanson Boulevard to Jay Street. (Blue Paper) John Rodeberg, TKDA
Consulting Engineer, has compiled five drawings for your review.
Staff has discussed the alignments and recommends that options 3
and 4 be examined further. The merits of each drawing will be
discussed briefly at the meeting.
Jay street to Tonson Site. (Pink Paper) Staff has prepared three
options for the alignment of Commercial Boulevard from Jay Street
to the Tonson Site. Again, the merits of each alignment will be
discussed further.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommended that alignment 4 between
Hanson Boulevard and Jay Street be utilized and that Option C be
top priority for the road alignment between Jay Street and
Nightengale Street. Please consult the enclosed minutes for
further discussion and background.
o
'.'
If i
0--...,-
-q:.*
~
~;.T"
~!:
~ ~
~ \J) Po
:L.
~
'-!)
...
o.
(R)
',---"
.._....._. ~r, ".~. .
----
:('
~
l
"l
z
o .
"" .
'" " c
~e i
0...1
2: ,. ,
'"<~~
,,:;:i
~ ~
o ~...
Z 0 ~
~
!
~ 4
~ ~
<1:.1-
o
'2 -.,-.-.-
\l1 !; 2
f;i ~ ~ 'l
~~ -
\.: " ~
_"^ ':l ~
):: .:. 0
-::; 3 q
.:;; 111. <1:. ..~
j
i
\
\.
VJ
ill
i OC
II
-"-1<...)
~'i~ .<t,
I .
,....r1 .J....
II
\.
."1
_.. if
t"'- .
:~ /( ".
_..1,
:~:
."
~~~I
"~;'l--'"
oS .
2 ~
: ~
- '1.5.--
,
I
, I
Ii.l r
d' i
to.... ''-5 !!'?4'''~ ~
...
(-\
-
.;~
@
-
\ I
\
\:::
~
~:t
('
.
,
-.;
~
.t-\
~!
....
~.
10::
"
!
,
s
~
{t
.,
~
-";.. ~
ei
~.,.
<>....
<>.
<>
~~
...
. ":if
~ 2
'~ ~~~
;: ~ ~.r~
_o\-.'~~
l .. ~e.
~ ~1Il
~
..
~
.....
,..
I~ ...l
~~I
t ,
at;
""l~
g~'
S "
..'I
. -.-'
..to.,
." .........
.... . -*.-...'.
: ~ ~
..' I
: I :
. ...... .
. I :
I ,:
I .'
j.
,
VI
~ .+- P-
O ~ .:\
"-
~ ,...
j:: ~ ~
.
tl ~
" ~
l \II ~
~ 3/: \..
'<l V\ 0
~
.
~
'2'
.
"l
i
I
1-
,
I
I
I
----~~. --I
I
~--_..,--
( f,tI
-----, ',-
_____ -LHiU/;'t',r
I
I
I
I I
,
1.._..._,_,__1
i .
!
I
1...--.--'"
.-
/.
'.t;~
--~ ---
C .
-L '
. "";w.; ~-'"
\t.~
r-
----- -
-l
\
\./
___L__'
/!wrofNf1'lb,rd Sf: ~W
r-- r-i--i
~__I J_
L... ___
I
.r:b/~ Sr. ;JW.
- _,I
i
i
I
i-' -71
,.1--/ I
-<
)--
------(
I ~.
I .
I "'.,
.- .... I "
-'- --,_.~
~
~
,,-- ---j ~
. I ~
,_..----J ~
I~
I~
-- ,---.
I~
--~~
.......
-F-,
1 !
! I
!
I
o
.~> j1A1r' ..1.59;1..1'>
.4 i~--'- -
'< \JJ -.----.
~~
~(!'>
~'\l
}.v.t:
---'-1s~
~\'ij
:>...
-..j
~'-l
-- ---
o
/'
(
:Y,
-0
~. i
.., ,
;- '/
~ i
(> I
~ ; " G -'
~ L."Wiikt6Swonder ...-as.,
i ..1"
OJ': I 2 3 ~--r:\ i 'PI ? 11'
., . I I', ' . I <.. J
~ . I~ ~~_L~.L.L~ \ Zz-_ 'i!~~\1 , ~ ...
'.,5aro.h 'JJn.'i ' " ..-,', , ".........--u, ~
l'!ll"il";~ l'~ -;j511~s-"'I\ ~3'~.d~
I ! ....! : ~ 18'0 0 II":
11 Ji ~i )"~i. I~:I~
1 ,.1 ! - / r:- -/3 7/ _ 171
l..'/r-uJ-rl 'n. " . '7.: <:: L \9
II -~'~fC)~ 'C-<~ (-- --'I~.:t/ ~:
, ~ / \';' 8\ -,- -i7 '---~-I!
, ' I ('
\ Xrb
~~o--
iirJ-']
:::t:
- .
F
..
(.>
:r
~,
~
f:s-'
l..C
~
:3
-c:
'"
:: '
-"-.
.; I
p' t... ~-jJLlnt5 " ,
~,1 HOll~ ,
...... / 2-
'" U'l ,
~. :+ '~
'" / ~s
~ 7"'1/
-- '
fO~.
"
Smi-lh
. 'u"
"H~5 "u.:r
-
,
o
J~
N
1
g
=1 --
'5 :-::
- ::
0 'Q)
c...:::
:z ::
3 ).
'..
~ ~
<S ~
...... "
'" ---::.
w
1 ~
'Q
s:: V ...,..
:7 ~
'~ $:
<..l ~
''1-- ~
~ ;;:
~ ....
~
C0 C;)
,,19#
~
\'2....,
.,- v
l'
'Y l' (0
~u.N+
~
n 1-1 17 7-1- 1-' 1-0
1"
- - -
Ifr /).J .IJJ 1;,( "jtJ /1
'}1
IJ-f . -- r '
114ih
"
~ I 5 ~ i
, 1.- :. -, r . 7 .;;;' j&' (c.(
- _I~ ~ ,-. - -
(co"
~c(- 'q,)'
-..,--, - -.-,-1
(7 j€~
;~
i ~ D !" ~",e"c..
il::
('/ I ~
J:_
,'"
!>-
f-
n M"$+el$I'e.
I
I
,
i
.~
~
~o tJ>' .
~.(
.$+-o.wt+" 11\
13
1
N
5 #(~n:.1t t> (,Yl 0,1, i',d.) -------
,~3'" '''f.:> 11-11-81 \,~ 8cekeplurSl-
....0
Whi.p o' Will wes+
..~._..w. ~... ,,___~":.:....:.:_~:..-'. .--:-:;':~'."':'::'.-::::,:,~ .;.~.: ...._ _-::_. .
~ Hu<<.s+, BoeJaJ ~'5te.(~lc:e) $+AIrl4lt\
. Prope.,+,'e~
I J'- ..-..;.'
s~.....~.. ---
Z
""0
0
N
"
-
W
0 ...J
<(
U
(J)
en'"
~~c=J
!lid .
i5!a
2
0
12_ [J
"''''
..'" I-
0.", w
0:1 w
CI) 5'" 0:::
N W "0 [J~
",.J
0:: ",0
u 5~
<( -.;
.Jen~. 0
......'"
-"'I;; .
~~ 2 .
'"
'" ~ocn '0
:;.... w
Sao!
..
:r
8
en D
....
",,,,
z w"
>0.
V W 0
00
Cl z....
0:: <l::>
..
<(
<.::)
Z
..
en
::>
If) en
0>
0 ....
s
'"
CI) ~O 'cT
<D l-
I- lilc:::J
<( 8
3:
,...
w
'"
.J
W
~
:;
en
w
.J
'"
..
i5
co
....
,,~
~3
..w
:r>
enW
o
o
"
""NOJ
911
'al:l '0:)
'OAlS 3>l\1l
N
'"
\<l~~'~'
i~ 'olov
0'"
wOo
o b
CI) ~
W 15
~I
iJj. <(
en I l
::>
: I
:'t cD! I
,-
t; o . '. <>
"". z ,~ I,
0 rr ~ <>
. " I-
w I
~ ::E
0 w I
en z (f)
WW :W <l
o;:f w
Zen '0.", .lo!Qo'
<l 0::-
Cl:en <(
"''' IDS~~
'" (!)
>-
<(
..,
en ~
::>
'"
'"
0 3:
u
0 '"
W CI)
c~
~ I-
>- 0 ~
'"
Cl: 3:
W 0
'"
'.
en
::>
..
0
Cl: Q
..
2
..; ,
:i
ci
.>
...J
CO
z
o
(J)
Z
<l
J:
tj
2
S~
:J::>
~:r
b::r
w!::
'"2
~~
cJ
~
~M'N
PJ~~I
z
'0
f-
a..
o
Z
"0
0
N
:11
0 W
.J
<( 911 'a~ '0:)
()
en
~~c=J I
-'-,
~~ . 0 0
'"
0 N ,..,
12_ 0 r
0:0:
<(w t-
0. OJ W
od W (f)~
(f) S,. 0:. W
N W <(0 [Jt; 15
0:: 0:-'
w~
U OJ<( <!
<! =Ix
,.-
W VI
',0 :::>
" ::J
-'VI-'
<(.... W
-0: In
u<( _ ~
o:o.:l! i:
w
,.., "'0"' '0 0
"'.... w "'.
8~o! 0
<(
x
!,l
~ '0 0 VI
w~
0:0: 0<(
Z w<( ZVl
150. <(
V W 0: VI
00 "'::>
a z.... CD
a:: <(:::>
<(
<!
t!l
'O^18 '''' ""NOS 1
l
I
t- I.
I
I
ID~o~
ID~~g
.;.
N
Z
o
f-
a..
o
t-
w
'"
.J
W
Ii;
:!
'"
w
-'
.~
"
.u
>-
<(
..,
~
o
0:
..
:lO
Q
.;
:i
,
z
o
(f)
z
<(
J:
(l)
1-
",ili
~~
..w
,,>
"'w
o
tj---
-~
,,1-
35
j:"
1;:"
wt:
CD;l;
f'"
(7)
o
d
~
~'N
. .. . -
'3M
PJ~~I
z
o
N (f)
W
0::
U
<(
'"
",w
~i)ir---1
~~L-.J.
u_
'"
CJ
f-
w
w
D~
~-
0:0:
<(w
Q.OJ
0=1
';3:
<(0
[55
~~
-:E
.J"'~' 0
<(....w
u~ !2!
0:0.::E .
w
"'0'"
",...w'O
SOia!
<(
'"
g
911 'O!:l '0:>
'OAl8 3>l'\1l !:I3>lNnsl
"~~~~""'''-''~~'k''''''"''':;;'>"pr,r~.,,,.,
o
,;Ii('
fC]
~~ amt
00:
wOo _
'" 00 0
....
0:0:
Z ~~
v W 00
0 z...
0:: <("
<( <(
<.?
0:
"
'"
z
<(
'"
'" "
'"
0 Q
0:
:>
'"
.(f) ~O 'cJ
lD l-
I- ;Cl
<(
~ 8
r--
<0
o
w
'"
.J
W
....
!!?
'"
'"
W
.J
0:
<(
'"
u
I-
",ffi
g~
~5
<(w
",>
",w
o
~
"?
tJ
~
'"
:=:J
i:
o
"':
o
'"
WW
0.J
z~
<(
0:'"
"'"
OJ
N
(f)",
w-:
15
<(
Z
:W
00.",
0::-
<(
<.?
...."q ".", ..;.-.~ ',~ ;.'....
-0--
o
I
o
'"
~
~
WI-
O:=z
<lW
Il:~
Cll!2
"'.J..J
'" ~ WW<l
=> >w
'" 8:1: ~
0: z3:
0 jO <l
<.i
Do: c:i
W (f) >
ci5 .J
ro
~ I-
1;: 0 ~
0:
W 0
'"
<;t
z
o
f-
a..
o
~
'"
~
o
0:
<(
'"
-i
'"
'"
<(I-
-z
:I=>
jO'"
cJ
li:j!:
W_
OJ",
~'"
'0
z
o
CfJ
z
<:(
:c
Q
'3M
~t-h'~
PJ~~I
z
b
o
oJ
"
'-
o
UJ
.J
<J
(f)
N
(f)
W
0::
U
<!
r'
...1",2. 0
<<I-W
-"'Ii;
~~ 2 .
W
:100'"
:IOI-W '0
8a~
<<
x
!,i
v
10
o
(f)
(I). l-
I-
<!
~
fo-
.(0
o
",W
~i:lr--l
S!i~L-J.
is-
:10
f!!_
"''''
<<w
11..,
0:1
S;O
<<0
",...I
wO
.,'"
..1<<
-.;;
o
o
f-
w
w
[J~
~
",,,,
w<<
1511.
00
ZI-
<<"
<<
'0
~o 'cJ
ill
Z c::J
g
'w
"
...I
w
I-
'"
i
'"
w
..I
'"
<<
is
I-
"ffi
g~
~5
<<w
x>
",W
o
911 '08 '0:>
.O^19 ,m H'~NJ
~~~'<;t~..w:,~_~,.,<t.",<<;('.;:";:::!-oo~:,-:,,~~,#.,,,!:.,",,~:>~:,~ ':
oJ
(f) ~
15
<!
'"
"
:=:J
j: ~
0
".
0
0 en Z
WW ;W
0...1
z<< '0.",
<<'" 0::-
"'''' <!
"'''
CIl (9
'"
:0
"
'"
O ~
<3
0",
w
CZ
~
~ 0
~ 0
>-
<t
-:>
'"
~
o
'"
<<
::E
..;
:i
.-~ --c!j"-" ---:l
<<I-
-z
:j"
~x
t:J
li:j:
llJi
:0",
x.
~
o 0
NI
'"
f-
:jJ.$ UJ
I~
~~ 3
:'~ n.
~(f)
; .~,.;;;':.?;, ~, z
~
.on
a:cO~
w...I...I
>w<<
8~
z:O 9
<<
<n
I-
~
3:
c:i
>
.J
(J)
2
\D
z
o
(f)
Z
<t
:r:
Ol
PJ<;;~1
9
-0
-:sic
k
.sic.
o
BUNKER LAKE BLVD. / CO. RD. 116
BEST AUTO PARTS
C. MISTELSKE
(3) I
(6)
WILBER AUTO PARTS 0
(HAROLD WILBER)
2 p..C?-t.-S
X\\)t.-~
Gf):
\'5 0
'-N p..\ COMMERCIAL AUTO PARTS
(CHARLES MISTELSKE)
(8) 3 (9)
D
CJ
ANDOVER AUTO PARTS
4
KURT 8 SUSAN
HURST
5
o
o
COMMERCIAL BLVD. LAYOUT
Jay 81. to Nightingale 81.
OPTION A
BUNKER LAKE BLVD. / CO. RD. 116
BEST AUTO PARTS
c. MISTELSKE
(311
(61
!lc
KURT a SUSAN
HURST
5
o
o
o
COMMERCIAL BLVD. LAYOUT
Jay 8t. to Nightingale 81.
OPTION B
-0
BUNKER LAKE BLVD. / CO. RD. 116
~
BEST AUTO PARTS
C. MISTELSKE
(3) I
(6)
4
:Jc.
:k.
KURT 8 SUSAN
HURST
5
o
o
o
COMMERCIAL BLVD. LAYOUT
Jay 81. to Nightingale 81.
OPTION C
J
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE December 19. 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
~
ITEM
NO.3. Metes and Bounds
Park Dedication
BY:
Ja
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the request of the
Park and Recreation Committee to take park dedication fees from
Metes and Bounds Lot Splits of five (5) acres or larger. Park
Board Chairman, Marc McMullen will be at the meeting to discuss
this item.
BACKGROUND
The City has not taken park dedication fees from Metes and Bounds
lot splits. The Park Committee has recommended that the City use
the same procedure for taking park fees from metes and bounds
splits as we would for any other subdivision.
Ordinance 10 currently states that park fees should be taken from
any subdivision of land. A metes and bounds split would fall
under the City's definition of a subdivision of land. The process
for determining park dedication fees (Section 9.07 of the
Ordinance 10) would be the same as with the subdivision/platting
process and would be required only on the new lot being created.
One concern that has surfaced is the possibility that a parcel
would be divided again. Once park fees are received from a
property, no additional fees can be taken from that parcel and
fees might be greater at a later date.
Also, the proposal would require the payment of park dedication
fees if a farm were split into two farms. Staff suggests that an
upper limit for acreage be set so that this problem could be
avoided.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
Page Two
3. Metes and Bounds Park Dedication
The city of Ramsey no longer accepts metes and bounds lot
divisions and did not take park dedication fees when metes and
bounds were allowed. The City of Ham Lake does not require park
dedication for these splits. Oak Grove does require park
dedication on metes and bounds lot splits.
COUNCIL OPTIONS
A. The Andover City Council may approve and direct staff to
prepare an amendment to Ordinance 10that specifically allows for
park fees to be taken on all metes and bounds lot splits.
B. The Andover City Council may approve the enclosed amendment to
Ordinance 10 that clarifies the taking of park dedication fees on
metes and bounds lot splits on parcels greater than 5 acres and
less than 20 acres.
C. The item may be tabled for further discussion.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission reviewed the request at
their November 28, 1989 meeting and recommended option B.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
o
ORDINANCE NO. 10
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10, THE SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 10 is hereby amended as follows:
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of , 198
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
Andover Planning and zoning Commission
November 28, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Ten
o
Second to motion by Vistad, All commissioners voted in favor with exception
as noted: Don Spotts does not favor plan for Commercial Bolevard. MOTION
passed; will be presented to City Council 12/19/89.
Commissioner Spotts asked Blake how many zoning changes will be required.
Blake replied Wegner's property and part ofMardaus property would be rezoned,
Metes and Bounds, Park Dedication
Background to the request for Planning and zoning Commission to review the
request of the Andover Park and Recreation Committee to take park dedication
fees from metes and bounds lot splits of five acres or larger is included
in commissioner's packets.
Mr. Marc McMullen, Chairman of the Andover Park and Recreation Commission
was present to discuss request with Planning and zoning Commission.
It is the opinion of City Attorney Bill Hawkins that a flat rate lot split
fee may not be legal.
Chairman McMullen suggested fee be set at 10% of fair market value.
Vistad recommended fee be set at 10% of fair market value, or $200.00, whichever
is less.
Spotts felt this would be unfair when comparing a small lot split with a
large development that could recoup fee.
Blake said another option would be to not allow metes and bounds. City could
require platting process for all divisions.
vis tad made a MOTION that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the
Andover City Council park dedication fee on all metes and bounds lot splits
be based on lO% of fair market value on newly created lots of parcels that
are less than 20 acres.
Second to motion by Don Spotts. All commissioners but Randal Peek favor
motion; MOTION passed.
Blake will prepare changes to Ordinance 40,
It was recommended that appraisal fee be negotiated between buyer and seller.
Ordinance Amendments
Don Spotts made a MOTION to approve amendments to city Ordinance 53 (Dog
Ordinance) and 62 (Discharge of Firearms Ordinance) as presented.
Second to motion by Randal Peek.
All commissioners favor motion, MOTION passed.
other Business
Chairman Pease suggested the holiday party be tentatively scheduled for January.
~ Commissioners will meet at the Andover City Hall offices at 6:30 P.M. on
cont ' d. . .
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
December 19, 1989
ITEM
NO.
4. Ordinance 53
Amendment
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review and approve the
enclosed amendment to Ordinance 53 (Dog Ordinance).
BACKGROUND
During the course of our research efforts for other planning
projects, staff has located Ordinances 1 and 2. These ordinances
were thought to have been lost in poorly kept Township records.
Ordinance #1 was first adopted in 1966. A copy of the original
ordinance is included in this packet.
Further research has indicated that the original ordinance was not
repealed by any action of the City Councilor Town Board. The
following Ordinance amendment is submitted for your approval.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
(0
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 53
AN ORDINANCE &~NDING ORDINANCE NO. 53, ADOPTED THE 17TH DAY OF
FEBRUARY, 1981', COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE DOG ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 53 is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 22. REPEAL
ted October 15, 1966, Ordinance No.5.
Or lnance No. 14, a opted February 26, 1973,
Ordinance No. 38, adopted
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of , 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
.-
o
TOWNSHIP OF GROW
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Ordinance No. 1
Dog Ordinance
Every owner of keeper of a dog shall cause the same to be
confined to the owner's premises. The Township Supervisors, or
persons authorized by the Supervisors, shall provide suitable dog
tags to the owners. A record of the owners' names and addresses
shall be maintained by the Township. Supervisors are authorized
to charge a sufficient sum for said tags to compensate the
Township for the cost of obtaining tags and maintaining an
identification system. Public authorities, or individuals
authorized by the Township, that pick up stray dogs; shall be
required to notify the owners of any stray wearing an
identificatioa tag. An owner may reclaim any dog so impounded
within five (5) days 'by paying an impoundment charge and boarding
fees. The amount of said impoundment charge and boarding fee
shall be established by the Supervisors. Any dog not claimed by
the owner within a period of five (5) days may be disposed of by
the person in charge of the impoundment.
Note ... To have a stray picked up, call any of the Township
Board members listed below. In case of an animal that aooears to
be sick or dangerous, call the constable first and if he'cannot
be reached, then call any of the ethers.
Supervisors
Louis Appleby
Leonard Johnson
LeRoy Winner
421-1922
421-4181
421-1859
Constable
Trueman Hulegaard
Justice of the Peace
Robert Nehring
421-3107
434-5623
By: Board of Supervisors
Leonard Johnson, Chairman
Edward Herman
Louis Appleby
o
(The Township Board meets on the second Tuesday of the month at
the red clubhouse on Andover Road.)
Notice published states "after October 15, 1966 ... all dogs and
cats must be confined to owner's property and must wear an
identification tag provided by owner. Stray dogs and cats may be
picked up and confined at owner's expense."
;,
'i~: .
. ' ,. :.~ :~;N~l:} ~;
GROW TO':~'NSHI.P:, DJG .OI:W.HIANC
<". . .: : \. .~. ':;~'~f . ';;~i!E~~l~.~!~:~~\:.t~.;-,
:: ~:{ "[We, ~>y .own er. a ~>': 1< e e P8, i; of .~ :<Jog ;shillJ:~~.c;~ ~Se;lj .J aJ~
. (.1" confIned to the Ofl11er s rr"fTlISes. rhe~''I'_o,~nsl up"~
;, ~.SOF.$., ,,?r. perr;ons'.8uthoeiZ. cd bYFthe Sllp~:iw;1J:$b~ :';.' 'a~l:J.fl
",~de,;~sultaole dog' tars to..theowners.d A~;r..eieQrctt "'l'he.;~ .,'
:: . n.emes: ~nd;' pd d re~;ses she:' 11. be mC1 inte i ned':b:Y:~th~dl19&';nsh'i~' .~~~~! .
~:,urerv1sars F're C'utharlzed to charr--8 a suI'f~1.c1e:IV~:~!~,sum;t<l: r"'j:':, ..
Sr.1U tA/ZS' .to cornren~:8 te the TO-Nnsh i p for !.the' 'cQst:1;of ',:ol::t;f~,h...:i H,k;,
i t1 g tf'gs, <' nd me t n t<:, i,! !'I1,'1 an id e n:tt f 1 ~f' ~ i 9n'fsyst'eli!J~'rub,F~:~::, H tiH;:j'
CJ \l th 0 r1 t I ~ S ~ or .1 nd ~ VI ~1 !JCll? (11.~thofl7.ed by "thl?' 'TownSrlp ;'tf;Lf1T~X! Hhr
p l~k. up s u r,'y dog~, ShH 11 . De r ~ Cl\llre9 to .n. o,~ J, f.y,J..th.e... ,ONnp.~~. :i'J i::M:;.",r.
,; 0 f, ?n:y . st rC'ly nee' 1"1 nF; nn 1 den t,l fl c~.t 1:J1! ; t9gjj ~An if.o:,vv.,er:\.ma~~~;" : :j :'l%rT
:;;. re~1~lm any dog so 1i1'l~0\Jnded w~th"-11n flV:~ ":(i5 ~d.qYi~t<PY p,:t~\i!!ing;t.;:t~A:
r . ';l n : 1 rn ro un d f:'1e n t c h (' t'f-' e end b 0<' rd 1 np;,,;f e e S .'l'T9;e nrmo.utft; 9 f -,sa~i1:.d iil JH <
l~nrO)tiJIdmcn1J ell;: T'f-'e F'Tld bar rd 1 ng'fep. f3h8~1";:,b~ est~,!?.l ~sh~c1.;J:hb,y it:1.';)
l' .t.rle.'JUrervI~lOrs, Any c!0,9.' not, c18~med bY:~lt.h.:~-"o~n. eiP...~tllthl.Il~~ :":1~!)).~:
l rer'l..Jd of fIve (5) dr-vs mF'y oe d18rOsed',of;~~by :.t.he,iJpe"'san:ifIn; +i'<.::
c,r:~r.fIT o~, the lu]paundmp-nt. ~.)~'c;~__ ~~:::!~~~~ .,kcU.J' _.,_~.~t jl-L:,~:
;':. '.' , ." I. " ,'" -: ."'.,. , '".. "r; '.1'~ ,: ".~. ,!I'!I;;." . '~'i!!'!..' l'~ 'r'---".
-1"';.:;il'.' ': . ::~;':!: ';'~~"'i':fi':: '\!':'~;'l':" . .!~:;~~t~ "f"'~~I.
Note~'~.rro c18ve ':1 stray picked up,'~r'll i~ny.f:t-or ..th,~JTo'Nn:3.i,l:~iI). :,;.LI.-
BOC'Jrd'fl1ertbel~S lIsted below. In cEI.se of <'In,,:anHnaX.;.trFlt ,"~~\~', ,'y>-;,
~. 'rlppe~.~rs to be sick 'Ol" d:"'rigero11s,0t:'11 the:':l9pnst~bJ}el fir~"t~ ;;'L-H~.
,( '('~d if he c?l1not .~e repehed t,hen<~pll ~;~.~~ik~1~;'\~~#;i~!1:f~er'sl~r~'TU~'
(.j;' Supervisors' :.:"': ,':"'::oc,,,,,"/ ..,,'>i"fJ' . . 'iF I., 0:1,,-
It; ;. ' . '.'. " : "j'. ~~f;;'; .. <fJ ::,>;; 'if!} t<:)
:< .' ' Louis Apr1eby.... ,'~',"oll:2J-l:q22:~[r: r:...;
Le 0 T1 C1 1'0 John son. . ,':.: .~:. 421-LJ.1En ;.:; ". ';'... .
LeHoy .flinner,:...., ..'.~.:?1-1e5.9 ".' 1;',;':::
Con,s tOp b 1 e ; , :: ':~d . . .,:.1._;'. :":J":~~~'~ ' :.b.rai; l'? :: '< :
I o' Truemo n H u1 eg~," rd ":"~~~jl~N',~l; 1 ~ [:wi
t. u., t,l ceo f : the 1 e~ :~~ :': :.::;X~f~ i' . .:l:;:-i'~ ~ );.t-.~ : ;'
..... J: .HObef~ NehF:~g~"" .":,~~!i!WVj.-5:~fFt .\rr ;.'~1'~i.:
BOr: 1':1 r.-:e<> ts; OT.' thr-:':' :seco no' '1'ue:~prYi.p.rf:the .,)~i :'1,/.;
:" ;~,,~.r
.. .,~ ...;
.,"' r~"li~:. ,.,.'t'.h'l' 'f.J:Jii' . '. .' ,
,i~ ; I'l:.:
}-Ht.. : ,L;r,;
~'~'!~;l . -~~-~t:"7;-~------'
..:If ; flW
'J::~"
,,,~,,;;i' ,- 1.~j" .
t'/:1r:i~:'T' "":;/:",~' f:
,.
~'
.~ :
:- :.:';.. .
;";, , .
;~:~"'~~l'~;" .
~: . ~.:. ~:
~.:. ('J.'heTomnshir
~;, . rriohtll C't,' the
",
j;:. ,.:
;..
:'. "
""
.~:.' ,
:..~r: ~~ I
I., .....} l
'~a~~ :
j;ff~ .
:. ...:. ~
: ~ :"- :.
.-.r.::'
~ :~J.t~ r
. iP-:':?E:'
. .t. . ~.
",......'9
. ::-: ~ ::
",",1..
~~l ; .
.-::'
,-
'.
~::
,. .
.t-.,
~ . . ' ,
. .~ ~~..: .
"
"
:;': ~ ?
:ii~
t
"
. 'L~t.. .:": '.
~..
.:\~1,
: '~::~:
I ;, ::. ~
.~..
.", .
. .
0:,.,
i
i \
:.) t~.;
" l.~:.
.; r~: ;' .
; .~.~. i. .
,"',.
';h,
: ~i. r: ~' ;
" ;., I': I \
-".:.~~ \
1 ;"
;.
f
, L.
';}:
".
,- ,
,-
..... ,
',' :,~ t .;::
.r.'
:'.::
~.
I:'
~- ," ~
.. "';1., ".;" H"\
-----.-------. -.- ..--- ..--....
~. .~" !
-'-
t~t (~
I GROW TO':~'r\
'finer. ,JY' ]<eep';p ,)f
to the unner's rr
"('1':;;00::" pl.lLho['i.z('~d !
IJ'" d '''g '.., ," ,- Lot "J e
- ..:~ U. v CJ ;. '. ..:' L. ".J ~ J
'ddT'e~;ses ~.3h211 i)C n
", 1" P. .., 111. h ') c- i "7 '" 'J ~. ,) AI;
f .., '" , \. _. _, '.:.. t .l,.. , (~r
~o (:orn.r'ell,:::;~ te the', Tot::
d r:12i.llt.F'ini71{! nn idi,iffi:~-
; , 0 l' i T1 d i v i d ur~ Is rl u t l~i'~~~,
';"y dO{T~;3hHll,bc l~~\l"
,y iJerrlllf! Cln Ide~lt,lf
d op; so ir':J ro tJ n:J ed ',II ii
~ont ell,'" l"fTr:\ ,.-,..,rJ b('~' ,...,~ ':'0
...., J ~ -.....: 1_ ",' \,J J..
ch~rFe 2nd toprding
s:) l~ S , Any' cJ 0 r, n () 1:. r: 1 ~1 '
, ; (5J d~vs !T)r'Y be di:"
,he in!poundiiJ(~nt."' :'
lt1Ve '? st-ray r.icl~ed u~, c,
rs llstea below. In cas
he 2ick or" d:"ng:erOl]S,~~
'C"l1!1,Jt be ;'epched then c::
Supervisors
r. ' I l'
-\)U1S \prAOY...
,Leonrrd Johnson.
LeHoy ~inner....
COllstpble
",.'.
.1J.?1-1022
,I.: ?l-LJ,Hn
,J-l.?'1-1f.59
. . ,
:....j.
..'
.;d :.I
i".:;'
;',.'
..::!
"r-
;:;'J
"~T i
: ! ~ '
Truem2n Huleg88rd
Justice of th~ ~eece
"h21-Jl U7
. . .
;~f. ,:
Rooert r!ehrrrlf-=--~~., .1-1-:34-5623
i'.
i r'
h~:.
\.
Bo('rd r.:e"t,p, or1
T'ed c:l1)bh,JU"'(>
-!- h ,-, ~(.,,' rI nIl 'J'UI" <::d ," y
.J' _.- '.~ oJ' u. . oJ".
O~1 ^ndJVCl' 11()r.'.J.J'
of
the:';',
~ .'
o
"f
it
. ~ ~
';'. '~.
~ :')
jL~}if}.::;
'::r';b~"t:j':;':.
':~fi~ij,t {t.":;:
1ilN
"j r~i;~;~~' :i,:
'~"...... ,... "
')1';" "
.::..' ",
'>~fr}t:' .
Jt~).
..
....
",' ,
Andover Planning and zoning Commission
November 28, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Ten
(0
Second to motion by Vistad. All commissioners voted in favor with
as noted: Don Spotts does not favor plan for commercial Bolevard.
passed; will be presented to City Council 12/19/89.
exception
MOTION
Commissioner spotts asked Blake how many zoning changes will be required.
Blake replied Wegner's property and part ofMardaus property would be rezoned.
Metes and Bounds, Park Dedication
Background to the request for Planning and Zoning Commission to review the
request of the Andover Park and Recreation Committee to take park dedication
fees from metes and bounds lot splits of five acres or larger is included
in commissioner's packets.
Mr. Marc McMullen, Chairman of the Andover Park and Recreation commission
was present to discuss request with Planning and Zoning commission.
It is the opinion of City Attorney Bill Hawkins that a flat rate lot split
fee may not be legal.
Chairman McMullen suggested fee be set at 10% of fair market value.
vistad recommended fee be set at 10% of fair market value, or $200.00, whichever
is less.
Spotts felt this would be unfair when comparing a small lot split with a
large development that could recoup fee.
Blake said another option would be to not allow metes and bounds. City could
require platting process ,for all divisions.
Vistad made a MOTION that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the
Andover City Council park dedication fee on all metes and bounds lot splits
be based on ~O% of fair market value on newly created lots of parcels that
are less than 20 acres.
Second to motion by Don Spotts. All commissioners but Randal Peek favor
motion; MOTION passed.
Blake will prepare changes to Ordinance 40.
It was recommended that appraisal fee be negotiated between buyer and seller.
Ordinance Amendments
Don Spotts made a MOTION to approve amendments to City Ordinance 53 (Dog
Ordinance) and 62 (Discharge of Firearms Ordinance) as presented.
Second to motion by Randal Peek.
All commissioners favor motion, MOTION passed.
Other Business
Chairman Pease suggested the holiday party be tentatively scheduled for January.
~ Commissioners will meet at the Andover City Hall offices at 6:30 P.M. on
cont'd.. .
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
December 19, 1989
ITEM
NO.5. Ordinance 62
Amendment
BY: Jay Blak
BY:
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning , n ~
lJ~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
REQUEST
The Andover city Council is asked to review and approve the
enclosed amendment to Ordinance 62 (Discharge of Firearms
Ordinance).
BACKGROUND
During the course of our research efforts for other planning
projects, staff has located Ordinances 1 and 2. These ordinances
were thought to have been lost in poorly kept Township records.
Ordinance #2 was first adopted in 1966. A copy of the original
ordinance is included in this packet.
Further research has indicated that the original ordinance was not
repealed by any action of the City Councilor Town Board. The
following Ordinance amendment is submitted for your approval.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
(0
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 62
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS AND BOW & -..
ARROWS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER AND REPEALING ORDINANCES ~ 12,
12A, 12B AND 12C
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
t,
Ordinance No. 62 is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION VI
981
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of , 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
/0
TOWNSHIP OF GROW
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Ordinance No. 2
Shooting Ordinance
There shall be no discharge of rifles or shotgun and slug
within said Township except under the following circumstances:
1. A resident may secure a written permit from the Township
Supervisors or a person delegated by said Supervisors authorizing
the discharge of a rifle on his own. property. ,Said permit may be
issued for a valid reason and provided it appears said discharge
would not endanger other residents.
2. Discharge of rifles will be authorized to those organizations
having a license to operate a rifle range provided said
discharge occurs within the area designated as a licensed rifle
range.
3. This Ordinance is not intended to apply to discharge of
shotaun and slue dur:nc the dee= huntinc season and as authorized
by State Law. - - -
By: Board of Supervisors
Leonard Johnson, Chairman
Edward Herman
Louis Appleby
Notice published states "after October 15, 1966 ... the discharae
of rifles, BB guns, pellet guns and shot guns with slugs are -
illegal unless the owner of property applies and gets a permit
from the Town Board of Supervisors."
o
'-"'0
o
. ,~~ ...~!,".".
SHOC'rIW ORDIN..UlC~
There shall be no t1schar~e of r11'les or shotgun an"
sl~ within sait township except un"er the follov~ circumstances;
1. A resiient may secure a written permit from the township
Supervisors or a person ielegated bT said Supervisors authorizing
the discharge of a rifle on his own property. Sait permit maT be
issuei for a valii reason end provided it appears saii iischarge
woult not en..~er other resiients.
2. Discharge of rifle. vill be authorized to those organizations
havi~ a license to operate a rifle range provited saii iischarge
occurs within the area designate" as a licenset rifle range.
J. This ordi~ce is not intentet to applT to tiechArge of shotgun
ant slug iuring the ieer hunting seaBon ant as authorize" bT
state law.
. .... "':'''-:' . - ..~ ""
/'
,(
i
~'.-,. ..
,:., ~
,'. .
:. '.
.;,
/
/
,/
,
/
,
"!";t.'~
I GROW
'r:JH~r. .:)Y' heep';j' t)f
to the Ulmer I s r
"', t' ". ,",' T') ,~. .,,, I. h 0 '" 1" '7 ,'" d' l .
'" '..'V '. ("'......1I I. .~.'.. .~.
1 e dog Jv ElI~ S t. 0 !.. h e ~,'
(1 'J 7' n <J-' C: P ~ q h, :;> '11 i") p r; f)
'" .. '10#'" ., '.;' OJ I ,. ~.;.
rre 2uth~rized to
o (:omr.-en~3:;-!te trl0 To
1 . '-l ' . . j'
Q elF.' J. n l:.F' 1 n 1 q{Z n n l' I;,., ....t
, 0 l' i n d i v i d I,li'l 1 s nut r~j.:,f,,;;'
~y dOFS;shAll b8 ~eg
i nerrinF ~rr ide~tif
dO€J; so ii'nrounJed wi 1 :.':iJi
en,t cllr'r'f"e .iT1sJ bo~: ~d i'na
r'-~'''L-C "rl~ ('O~'''(JlnD' ~
..~;.J (. I t- 'J ("'. \~ ..J r l . F;' .~
? J ~' S . A i1:' GO i-! n ,) t, r: 18 ;@:
r"~ , (5) d ~.v s ;nr> ~1 :) e d" '~
n lf~!pOUnGrilf.!nt. : '\
ve a stray ficl~ed up;<i
:'5 listed bf~ ow. In eelS
Je ~icl-< or' d:"ngel'Ol]S,~"
......,n:)... ;"e "'o"'~"\-'e'" ....nen ro'
0.. .. u v . ......c \4' i.1 ..l l~ ';' \""
'".:'-:-.;'- ;-:;
. .'\: -,.
1~~1
,..; ~. ...'
~". :..
'.' ."
Su peT''' is''Jrs
Louis AorlAbv _.
.Leonprd-John~on.
I Q ,..
,-,eucy ;llnner.
::':;r.f~11~<":?::<' ,
, . (11:....... ...... 'I"
;~Jf~ti[:/l:,'l
"'j t ,!.i>v...,.. 0.. <,'
'~~Ift'l
~l-~;:r!~":\,,:' . ,"
; ~;;_:;.:.,'.' ':'.:,
j~~rrr: . ':~
]~r
. '.{..:~.~,;:~ :':.
~l~)(
. . .
.lJ.?1-1022
J.-, "''''1
. .: ,': J. -LJ'l \...
J!.?1-~c.59
.;.......;.
. ;~. ; :':i.
. ~~~i~ .,0
:~J
. '~~j.
.. . ~
,':,-i' ~.
COT1st?ble
", . i:~ ::-
,..::1
1 . . ~ ~L
Truernf1n
""1 '<1" "~
., '-t'r... -.~' ....J (
.' 'CT i
.J
Bul egrJ[! rd
. . .
Justice of
ref ce
... l"'I,-,
\.. a I ~.
.:;'
-'
:' "
. .J.~
. ~.; r
Rooert.
.1.1.]4- 562 3
r! e h pin f! -; ---.--. .
. ,
r'
B02 rrl r.:e" t,s or1
r'erJ cl1Jbl'l..Ju"'(>
'.
..
':)
-1- h,", c: (."...., nIl 'J' Ul" -:-:d ," Y
.J . .. ~ ,.,...,' U . oJ...
0:1 l\ f1 dJ v;-- l' it 0 c'..J . J .
of
the
o
.,
" "
"
"
:,>
, ,
)~I
':'if~
~ffj'
:HI
. .--...~
,~~
........;
,:'.~~
:!{tf\'
....::.:....
":'..::-'
...:.,
;;:.~:::.~~~.l
~1
~ .;:
~.: ..."
::Jh
:; .:~.:
~ , .
,l
< 3- ~~:
~ :; ~J.
.' "...-........ '~'--..
"
)
/0
,
I
TOWN OF GROt.,
I
4
1
Minutes of Annual Meeting
March 14. 1967
~~
:~
The meeting Was held in the library of the uilson ~chool
in .!.nob ani. waS called to orier b)" Chairman, Leonard Johnson.
Lyle ~adle)" ....as nominate.. ani. approvei b,- all to be the
moierator for the meeti~.
I
I
,
I
The minutes of the last annual meeting were reai. b)" the ~o""n
Clerk, Gail Palin' ani were approve.. b,- all.
A swnmar)"of the treasurer I s report for the pA-st )"ear WAS read.
b)" the Town Treasurer. Janett ETelani.. Tt WaS noted that the balance
totaled ~14905.34--$9509.39 is balance in Checking account ani $5395.95
is balance in Sa,vi~s Certificate incluH~ interest.
Kenneth Olson askei A-bOl1t acquisition of lani' for Town property-.
Leoneri Johnson reportei that nothing iefinite has been ione but that
the matter has b,een lookei into.
t
t
,
.
j~:~ !
., I
:':':" f
1
...;,
Winslow iiolasek askei about 8~ns that are to be postei regariiDg
the shooti~ oriinance. Leonari Johnson reportei that the si~ns had
b...n iel~ei because of the issue being up for a Tote. It ....'AS reported
that a Tote of ~l ;res ana.:;.O no had. been cast 80 that the oriinance
will no.... be ~n e::ec~ ~!~tne signs will be iput up.
':~:: f
. ."~."
:~.~..
A live~ iiscussion was heli regariing the buiget for the coming
7e;u:. The Town Joar;, has recommeniei it6000 for Roai. &. :Briige lilnd.,
$4091 for Revenue ani $500e for a builiillg funci for a Town :a:all. A
iiscussion of acquiring land and ....hether a. ~500 an acre alimit shaull
be aiherei to followei.
Carl Erickson mate a motion that a site selection committee be set
up to look into iif!erent propert'T sites av.dlable so that one coul! be
founi that wouli be e&reeable. This motion was unanimouslY' agree...
\
\
I
l
"' .
"
"
;,'.'"i
1qle :BraileY' reai R. letter sent t,o the Town Joard. from Mr. Luniheim.
}noka Count)" iighWA7 Dept, advising the township of the (ecision of the
Count7 not to snowploW ~ovnship roai.s. ,I live~ d.iscussion WAS helt on
the problem of ,etti~ ploving equipment for the 'rown,ship.
Lyle McLaughlin male a motion that the Township consiier bllY'iIlg
one piece of ne.... s::ct removal equipment to be use<<. for the comi~ Y'ear.
After much ii8CUssion this motion VaS not carriei bY' vote.
, .
,
....
Richart Schneider mate a. motion that :!a6000 be put in the budget~~~~~_~
'lor the Roai &: :Jriige FunS.. This motion vas agreed. to b)" vote.
o
The budget for the comi~ Y'ear WaS recommended bY' all to i:lclud.e
$16006 for Roal &. :Bridge )'unci, $4000 for Revenue SUlci :1\.50&0 for builii~.
I
I
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
November 28, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Ten
(0
Second to motion by Vistad. All commissioners voted in favor with
as noted: Don Spotts does not favor plan for Commercial Bolevard.
passed, will be presented to City Council 12/19/89.
exception
MOTION
Commissioner Spotts asked Blake how many zoning changes will be required.
Blake replied Wegner's property and part ofMardaus property would be rezoned.
Metes and Bounds, Park Dedication
Background to the request for Planning and Zoning Commission to review the
request of the Andover Park and Recreation Committee to take park dedication
fees from metes and bounds lot splits of five acres or larger is included
in commissioner's packets.
Mr. Marc McMullen, Chairman of the Andover Park and Recreation Commission
was present to discuss request with Planning and Zoning Commission.
It is the opinion of City Attorney Bill Hawkins that a flat rate lot split
fee may not be legal.
Chairman McMullen suggested fee be set at 10% of fair market value.
Vistad recommended fee be set at 10% of fair market value, or $200.00, whichever
is less.
Spotts felt this would be unfair when comparing a small lot split with a
large development that could recoup fee.
Blake said another option would be to not allow metes and bounds. City could
require platting process for all divisions.
Vistad made a MOTION that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the
Andover City Council park dedication fee on all metes and bounds lot splits
be based on 10% of fair market value on newly created lots of parcels that
are less than 20 acres.
Second to motion by Don Spotts. All commissioners but Randal Peek favor
motion, MOTION passed.
Blake will prepare changes to Ordinance 40.
It was recommended that appraisal fee be negotiated between buyer and seller.
Ordinance Amendments
Don Spotts made a MOTION to approve amendments to City Ordinance 53 (Dog
Ordinance) and 62 (Discharge of Firearms Ordinance) as presented.
Second to motion by Randal Peek.
All commissioner'ij-'favorIUotion, MOTION passed.
other Business
Chairman Pease suggested the holiday party be tentatively scheduled for January.
~ Commissioners will meet at the Andover City Hall offices at 6:30 P.M. on
cont'd.. .
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Dgsgmser 19, 1989
n; .~-
Engineering
APPRO\(~ FOR
AGENDJ
~HI~b
BY: j
V
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO, 6. Kensington Estates
4th Addition
BY: .,~~~" '" "~hv~_"
REQUEST
The City Council is requested to review the revised street pattern
for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of Kensington 4th Addition.
The plan allows for a 200' buffer strip between the 4th Addition
and the WDE landfill.
BACKGROUND
The MPCA/EPA have requested a 200 ft. moratorium zone with no
buildings constructed, allowing for buffering, road, fencing, etc.
around the WDE landfill.
Jerry Windschitl met with Jim Elling on 12/13/89 and reviewed the
sketch plan for the proposed revision to the PUD/preliminary plat
of Kensington Estates. Mayor Elling asked that the item be
added to the agenda.
The ARC hasn't had an opportunity to review the revised plan.
Planned Unit Developments are approved with a Special Use Permit
and Ordinance 8 requires that an amendment to a PUD be processed
in the same manner as the original PUD. Ordinance 8, Section 5.03
is included for your review. This process would include
notification of property owners within 350 feet of the property, a
public hearing and Planning and Zoning Commission review and
approval.
I briefly reviewed the proposal with Jim Elling and Jerry
Windschitl and noted some planning issues that must be reviewed,
such as: cul-de-sac length, street right-of-way width.
If these changes in the planned unit development are significant,
they must be referred back to the Planning and Zoning Commission
for review.
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
December 14, 1989
Mayor James Elling
Members of Council
Mr. James Schrantz
City of Andover
In a recent meeting with the MPCA, they made a request that
we provide a 200' non-buildable buffer zone along part of the
east end of the 4th Addition of Kensington Estates. The
attached drawing would give the MPCA what they had requested.
We would request that the City Council review the attached
drawing and comment on it.
The lots in the drawing all meet or exceed ordinance requirements
except for the following:
(1). Lot 2 would not meet the requirement for measuring
the building set back line. It would meet all other
ordinance requirements.
(2). Both the 142nd Lane and 142nd Ave. cul de sac lengths
would exceed the maximum lengths as defined by
ordinance.
(3) .
(a) On the short part of 142nd Ave. (from the corner
to the cul de sac), we would request that the 60'
street dedication be made in the following manner:
50' of dedication in the plat
1~' of additional easement provided
60' in the plat
(bl On the 142nd Ave. cul de sac we would request that
the 60' radius be made in the following manner:
50' of dedicated radius in the plat
10' of additional easement provided in the plat
60'
It should be noted that the end result of the above,
would give the City exactly the same area, size of
street, and ability to construct utilities as would
exist if both are dedicated as 60'.
(4) .
We would also be asking permission to move the exit
point of 141st Ave. east by approximately 60' and
change the lot configuration in this area. The revised
lots would meet all sections of the ordinance.
o
o
We would respectively request that the City council act on this
request as soon as possible and that it not be. sent to the
Planning Commission due to the time constraints involved. we
make this request based upon the following:
The original approval for Kensington Estates were made under
a special use Permit and the Planned Unit Development sections
of, the ordinance. In reviewing the PUD section (4.18 of
ordinance 8) it would appear that the above requests are with-
in the intent of the ordinance.
Also, in reviewing section 5.03 of ordinance 8, regarding
special use permits, it would appear that a change made to
a special use permit would only have to go through the
procedure as if a new permit were being issued if one of the
following conditions existed:
( 1 ) .
(2) .
(3) .
(4) .
Change involving structural alteration
Enlargement
Intensification of use
Or similar change not specificallY'~permitted~~!?y
the special use permit
The change we have requested:
(1). Do not change the structural aspect as none exist
or are being asked for
(2). Are not an enlargement or intensification of use
(In fact the results of the request is for a
reduction in use)
(3). Do not make any changes in the use that was originally
permitted
In addition to the above, the City council has broad administra-
tive authority to handle a request such as this.
The time element involved in this request and the need to obtain
City council approval on this issue are of extreme importance
to us. We stand ready to supply what ever additional information
the City needs from us to expedite this request.
Sincerely,
~W-L----Ul::/
~vtd W~L.hd(
Jerry Windschitl
Carol Windschitl
o
14/5 r
.--1-'- -- '-- '---,'.' '--'-----1"-----,1 '
I :
I j
I I I,
----- -- ___n___ -,-'.,.,-__L~__u_,_..____ -r---'------- ___..,___,_
! I I I
. I I
I
I
~
o
($
i
~
Ii
-t
~
~
tJ
tJ
-l.
"
14ZN PAVE.
f8 /7 /6
Ji
/2
I
,
I
ll- ~
(} :
. .,j:
... -
6J
--_.~.._._._-----------
AVE/OlE
..- -"'~..' ._......~.--_.__e..__.. '_-'_.
.._-~_._._......- -'-~-'.
o
Ordinance No.8, Section
(B) Submission of a plot plan showing structures, parking,
driveways, landscaping and screening.
o
(C) If construction has not begun within twenty-four (24)
months, or if the project is not fifty (50%) percent
completed within five (5) years, any further development of
any type shall require a Special Use Permit and the Planning
Commission may move to initiate a rezoning back to that in
effect prior to Neighborhood Business (NB) or Shopping Center
(SC) zoning.
(D) The area zoned shall include at least two (2 a.) acres
for Neighborhood Business (NB) and five (5 a.) acres for
Shopping Center (SC).
.
Any area noted on the zoning map as "sc" with no definite boundary
shall be administered as follows:
(A) Only one (1) corner of any major road intersection may
be zoned for Shopping Center (SC) at anyone time.
(B) The landowner shall submit a plan in accordance with the
provisions of a "Planned Unit Development".
(C) The City Council may grant or deny the request for
business zoning based upon the plans submitted.
(D) A market feasibility study shall be submitted to
indicate need, size and future size.
, I 'lI
"-." ~
4.18 Planned Unit Developments
and
Such developments may be excluded from certain requirements of
this Ordinance providing:
-
(A) A complete detailed plan is submitted to the Planning
Commission showing the location of all proposed structures,
driveways, landscaping, parking, screening, access drives,
land uses and such other information as may be requested.
'0
It is the intent of this Section, Planned Unit Development, to
provide a means to allow flex-rbIrH:y-by substantial variances from
the provisions of this Ordinance including uses, setbacks, height
and similar regulations but not including parking requirements,
off-street loading, necessary screening and the like.
Variances may be granted with the granting of a Special Use Permit
for Planned Unit Developments p4ovided:
Page 26
Ordinance No.8, Section
~
(1) Certain regulations contained in this Ordinance do
not realistically apply to the proposed development due
to the unique nature of the proposed devel~pment.
(2) The variances, if granted, would be fully
cdnsistent with the general intent and purpose of this
Ordinance.
(3) The planned Unit Development would produce urban
development and an urban environment of equal or
superior quality to that which would result from strict
adherence to the provisions of this Ordinance.
j( (4) The variances will not constitute a threat to the
property values, safety, health or general welfare of
the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land nor
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, or general
welfare of the people.
~ (5) The proposed development is of such unique nature
as to require consideration under conditions of a
Planned Unit Development. It shall be determined that
the variances are required for reasonable and
practicable physical development according to a plan and
are not solely on the basis of financial considerations.
---~ (B) The governing body, upon review and recommendations of
the Planning Commission, shall find that the proposed
development is fully consistent with the purpose of this
Ordinance and in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.
'--
..,..(C) The development shall conform to the plan as filed with
City of Andover or as thereafter amended.
---~ (D) A Special Use Permit is granted.
4.19 2-Family Home Conversions
Such conversions may be permitted following issuance of a
Special USe Permit provided that each dwelling unit be provided
with individual sewer stubs, individual wells or sources of water,
and that a party wall agreement, including an arbitration clause,
be entered into by all affected parties. Such ~onversion must
take place pursuant to a plan submitted to the Planning Commission
showing the location of the sewer stubs, individual wells or
sources of water, party wall; shall include submission of said
party wall agreement; and upon submission of a survey setting out
each individual lot and its location along said party wall. (8N,
10-06-81; 8BB, 4-02-85, 8RR, 7-21-87)
'-0
4.20 Density Zoning
Single-family homes may be excluded from lot area and setback
requirements provided a Special Use Permit is issued under terms
of the Planned Unit Development provisions of this Ordinance. In
the alternative the City Council may require all land so excluded
from the lot area to remain in private ownership, but, require the
owner to record restrictive covenants, in favor of the City, which
would prohibit the development of such property until such time as
public utilities are available. (8II, 10-7-86)
Page 27
Ordinance No.8, Section
o
Such hearing may be continued from time to time in the event
the Planning Commission needs additional .information from the
applicant or other sources to make its decision. The
Planning Commission shall take action on the application
within sixty (60) days from the date of the original public
hearing, unless a written extension is granted by the
applicant. (8FFF, 12-06-88)
(D) The Planning Commission shall make its report to the
City Council on or before the next regular meeting of the
City Council following the date of the hearing. Such hearing
may be continued from time to time in the event the Planning
Commission needs additional information from the applicant or
other sources to make its decision. The Planning Commission
shall take action on the application within sixty (60) days
from the date of the original public hearing, unless an
extension is granted by the applicant. (8G, 5-20-80)
The report of the Planning Commission shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council in the following manner:
(1) Recommendations from the Planning Commission
meeting held on the second Tuesday shall be placed on
the agenda of the City Council no later than their first
Tuesday meeting of the following month.
'-
(2) Recommendations from the planning Commission
meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be placed on
the agenda of the City Council no later than their third
Tuesday meeting of the following month, unless there are
five (5) Tuesdays in the given month from which the
recommendation of the Planning Commission is made, in
which case the recommendation shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council no later than their first
Tuesday meeting of the following month. (8FFF, 12-06-
88)
(E) The City Council must take action on the application
within sixty (60) days following referral by the Planning
Commission. The person making the application shall be
notified of the action taken. Such action may consist of
approval, denial, or referral back to the planning
Commission. If the item is referred back to the Planning
Commission, it must reviewed and returned to the City Council
w!thin thirty (30) days. (8G, 5-20-80)
(F) No application for rezoning which has been denied wholly
or in part shall be resubmitted for a period of one (1) year
from the date of said order of denial.
~
5.03 Special (Conditional) Uses General Statement
(A) Special Use Permits--m-,fY be granted or denied in any
district by action of the City Council.
The Andover City Clerk shall maintain a record of all Special
Use Permits issued including information on the use,
location, conditions imposed by the City Council, time
limits, review dates, and such other information as may be
appropriate. A copy of the Special Use Permit shall also be
filed with the Building Inspector.
page 35
Ordinance No.8, Section
o
new
All uses existing at the time of adoption of this Ordinance
and automatically granted a Special Use Permit, shall be
considered as having a Special Use Permit which contains
conditions which permits the land use and structures as they
existed on said date and any enlargements, structural
alteration, or intertsificationof use shall require an
amended Special use Permit as provided for above.
Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular
zoning district, may, under some circumstances be suitable.
When such circumstances exist, a Special Use Permit may be
granted. Conditions may be applied to issuance of the permit
and a periodic review of the permit may be required. The
permit shall,be granted for that particular person or firm.
The cancellation of a Special Use Permit shall be considered
administratively equivalent to a rezoning and the same
requirements and procedures shall apply.
(B) Criteria For Granting Special Use Permits:
In granting a special use permit, the City Council shall
consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission and:
"--
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding
lands,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions including
parking facilities on adjacent streets and land,
the effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area, and
the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive
Plan.
If it shall determine by resolution that the proposed use:
will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals,
or general welfare of the community -
nor will cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will seriously depreciate surrounding property
values, and
that said use is in harmony with the general purpose and
intent of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive plan,
~
the City Council may grant such permits.
(1) In-home beauty salons/barber shops shall be subject
to the following:
Page 36
Ordinance No.8, Section
o
a. One (1) chair salon/barber only
b. The hours of operation shall be approved by the
Ci ty Council.
c. Parking requirements shall be as set out in
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08.
d. The salon/shop must comply with the state
Cosmetology Board and the State Barbers Board
requirements.
e. In non-sewered areas, the septic system must be
in compliance with Ordinance No. 37, the On-Site
Septic System Ordinance. A beauty shop/barber shop
shall be considered the equivalent to one (1)
bedroom in terms of usage under Ordinance No. 37.
f. The Special Use Permit shall be subject to an
annual review.
g. The beauty shop/barber shop shall be owner
occupied.
h. Upon sale of the premises for which the Special
Use Permit is granted, such Permit shall terminate.
i. Drawings detailing the salon/shop shall be
submitted at the time of the request for the
Special Use Permit.
\.-'
j. In non-sewered areas, a minimum of 39,000
square feet of lot size shall be required.
k. In non-sewered areas, the septic system shall
be inspected annually before the Special Use permit
is reviewed. (8Q, 5-4-82)
(2) Retail Shopping in Indu~trial Districts shall be
subject to the following:
a. The Special Use Permit shall be subject to an
annual review.
b. Detailed drawings of the building to be used or
converted shall be submitted.
c. The use that the Retail Shopping is to be put
shall be s ta ted.
d. Parking requirements shall be as set out in
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08.
e. A general inventory shall be provided along
with other items determined necessary by the city
Council. (8R, 7-6-82)
\0
(C) Procedure:
(1). The person applying for a Special Use Permit shall
fill out and submit to the Clerk a "Request for Special
Page 37
Ordinance No.8, Section
o
Use Permit form" together with a fee as set by City
Council resolution. An additional fee of fifty ($50.00)
dollars may be required for each meeting in excess of
two (2), which is necessary because of in~omplete
information or changes in the petition.
(2) The Clerk shall refer the application to the
planning Commission. property owners and occupants
within three hundred fifty (350') feet of the property
in question shall be notified at least ten (10) days
prior to the Planning Commission meeting, although
failure of any property owners or occupants to receive
such notification shall not invalidate the proceedings.
Notification shall be by mail. The petitioner shall be
required to submit a list of the property owners and
occupants within three hundred fifty (350') feet as part
of the petition. (8A, 2-14-75; 8FFF, 12-06-88)
(3) The Planning Commission shall consider the petition
at its next regular meeting, but not earlier than seven
(7) days from date of submission to the Planning
Commission.
(4) The petitioner or his representative shall appeat
before the Planning Commission in order to answer
questions concerning the proposed Special Use Permit.
~
(5) The report of the planning Commission shall be
placed on the agenda of the City Council in the
following manner:
a. Recommendations from the Planning Commission
meeting held on the second Tuesday shall be placed
on the agenda of the City Council no later than
their first Tuesday meeting of the following month.
b. Recommendations from the Planning Commission
meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be placed
on the agenda of the City Council no later than
their third Tuesday meeting of the following month,
unless there are five (5) Tuesdays in the given
month from which the recommendation of the Planning
Commission is made, in which case the
recommendation shall be placed on the agenda of the
City Council no later than their first Tuesday
meeting of the following month. (8FFF, 12-06-88)
(6) The City Council must take action on the
application within sixty (60) days after receiving the
report of the Planning Commission. If it grants the
Special Use Permit, the City Council may impose
conditions (including time limits) it considers
necessary to protect the public health, safety and
welfare, and such conditions may include a time limit
for the use to exist or operate.
~ (7) An Amended special Use Permit application shall be
administered in a manner similar to that required for a
new special use permit except that the fee shall be as
set by City Council resolution. Amended Special Use
permits shall include re-applications for permits that
page 38
~
Ordinance No.8, Section
have been denied, requests for changes in conditionS,
and as otherwise described in this Ordinance.
o
(8) No application for a Special Use Permit shall be
resubmitted for a period of one (1) year from the date
of said order of denial.
(9) When a Special Use Permit may be of general
interest to the Community or more than the adjoining
owners, the Planning Commission may hold a public
hearing and the Special Use Permit shall be reviewed
with notice of said hearing published at least ten (10)
days prior to the hearing.
5.04 Variances and Appeals
Where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in
any way of carrying but the strict letter of the provisions of
this Ordinance, an appeal may be made and a variance granted. The
hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics
of the land and not the property owner.
The procedure for granting variances is as follows:
(A) A person desiring a variance shall fill out and submit
to the City Clerk a "Request for Variance form" together with
a fee as set by City Council resolution if the variance
request involves single-family residential. All other
requests shall have a fee as set by City Council resolution.
(B) The application shall be referred to the Planning
Commission which shall submit a report to be placed on the
agenda of the City Council in the following manner:
(1) Recommendations from the Planning Commission meeting
held on the second Tuesday shall be placed on the agenda
of the City Council no later than their first Tuesday
meeting of the following month.
(2) Recommendations from the Planning Commission meeting
held on the fourth Tuesday shall be placed on the agenda
of the City Council no later than their third Tuesday
meeting of the following month, unless there are five
(5) Tuesdays in the given month from which the
recommendation of the Planning Commission is made, in
which case the recommendation shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council no later than their first
Tuesday meeting of the following month. (8FFF, 12-06-
88)
(C) The petitioner shall appear before the Planning
Commission in order__t,<:l___an~wer questions.
"'-0
(D) The City Council may grant the variance request if it
will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this
Ordinance and if it finds that strict enforcement of this
Ordinance will cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the individual property under consideration.
Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue
hardship "if reasonable use of the property exists under the
terms of the Ordinance. (8FFF, 12-06-88)
page 39 "
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
n~""'iPomhiCllr
1Q
.
laeS!
7.
BY:
V. V
'JY
\~
APPR1VE
AGE~ A
\
,
BY: i
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM License Renewals
NO.
The City Council is requested to approve the 1990 licenses for
the following:
Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor
JJ's Liquors
G-Will Liquors
On-Sale Non-Intoxicating
Liquor
Tasty Pizza
Off-Sale Non-Intoxicating Liquor
Superamerica
Bill's Superette
Brooks Food Market
Speedy Market
Tom Thumb
Junkyards
Anoka Auto wrecking
Wilber Auto Parts
Commercial Auto Parts
Cigarette Licenses
Bill's Superette
Superamerica
Brooks Food Market
Speedy Market
Tom Thumb
Festival Foods
Merwin Drug
Tasty Pizza
JJ's Liquors
G-Will Liquors
Attached are the junkyard license renewals along with,the
inspection reports.
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Honorable Mayor and city Council
License Files
~LI'f~
Jay Blake, City Planner (~LUV
December 19, 1989
Junkvard Inspection Results
The 1990 Junkyard license inspections were completed on December
5, 1989. David Almgren and I reviewed the ordinance requirements
with each salvage yard and then toured each yard. The enclosed
checklist was filed out and a copy of the problem areas were left
with each junkyard.
Most of the junkyards were greatly improved over last year.
Several problem areas still exist, including the exterior storage
of waste tires.
Two of the eight junkyards passed on the first inspection.
Anoka Auto Wrecking
Commercial Auto Parts
The remaining junkyards have yet to request are-inspection.
Updated information will be presented at the meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the 1990 Junkyard Licenses for Anoka
Auto Wrecking and Commercial Auto Parts.
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Honorable Mayor and city Council
License Files
Jay Blake, City planne
December 19, 1989
Junkyard Inspection Results
.
I have completed an inspection for Wilber Auto Parts. The yard
met the criteria outlined in Ordinance 44. The tires cited in
the first inspection have been removed.
staff recommends approval of the Wilber Auto Parts Junkyard
License.
o
o
o
";.~
CITY of ANDOVER
APPLICATION FOR JUNKYARD AND JUNK DEALER'S LICENSE RENEWAL
1990
ALL 1990 APPLICAT,IONS FOR JUNKYARD LICENSES SHOULD BE RECEIVED NO
LATER THAN FRIDAY NOVEMBER 3, 1989. LATE APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE
CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: 9- II- P;7
I. Background Information
(Complete in Full)
NAME OF APPLICANT <7-VCVlO Id Vd-.Y.-e '367]
RESIDENCE ADDRESS IIt?u7 /!:Yj/? A21.A XR . ,Ij,u.L~d. /7. {U
/ . .
BUSINESS NAME CU7&-tt?CJ..-.; U_(jJv I-LJ? t.. {iJQ-<-.fl.g f..47(1./
BUSINESS ADDRESS I ? 7-6- t6LUZ-A:?.LA ~ IO-Lt.L./'/ n. L(J
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION (ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET)
TELEPHONE NUMBER: RESIDENCE 755-d0-Y"CJ- BUSINESS 7S5 ~.L).5/f()
PARTNERSHIP (7.L'JJp. ADDRESS ~
PHONE -
II. Required Information
(please check off if included)
\/' Proof of Insurance
\.-/ Bond
../
Motor Vehicle Dealers License (State of Minnesota)
../
Inspections Form l~om~leted by the City of Andover)
Fees Paid
RENEWAL FEE: $500.00
o
o
,
Pas..e 2
19.L{l Junkyard License Application
NOTE: Application will not be accepted unless all ordinance
requirements are met.
I understand that falsification of information requested on this
form or violation of Andover Ordinance No. 44 may be cause for
revocation or suspension of my license.
i.4~ &-?~ fle-)
~~~rip-pITcant -"--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE USE ONLY
Insurance Expires:
Bond Expires:
LICENSE GRANTED:
LICENSE DENIED:
LICENSE NUMBER AND DATE:
Authorized Signature
o
ORDINANCE #44 (JUNKYARD) CHECKLIST
CITY OF ANDOVER
DATE
IzJS"/~'
NAME OF BUSINESS /1-nO/'a.. AulD "IIJru,!t..'t1 ,
OWNER/OPERATOR 4I1M"" /d ,T..eIfL s (/'Y\
The following items must be completed prior to the City Council
app~oval of the Junkyard Operator's permit:
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Copy of Current City License
State of Minnesota Auto Dealers License
Proof of Liability Insurance
Proof of Bond
/
V--
V-
;::;;;r
II. OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
Sanitary Condition in Yard
v
V
~
~
L/'J
/
V
.,/"
V'
"~
~,
Property Identification Verification
'No Garbage/hazardous Piles in Yard
No Junk within 40 Feet of Curb
No Junk higher than 10 Feet
Open Fire Lanes
No Excessive Combustible Materials
Approved Gas and Oil Removal Process
Bill of Sale, Title Card or Receipt Files
Sale Files
Yard Safety
III. FENCING REQUIREMENTS-
pc6S
v
v'
V
I'll)
o
Eight Feet High at Street Level
Fence Around area that doesn't abut yard
Living Fence on Street Frontage
o
o
." .
CITY of ANDOVER
APPLICATION FOR JUNKYARD AND JUNK DEALER'S LICENSE RENEWAL
1990
ALL 1990 APPLICATIONS FOR JUNKYARD LICENSES SHOULD BE RECEIVED NO
LATER THAN FRIDAY NOVEMBER 3, 1989. LATE APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE
CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE:
1/-e:;J. -gf
I. Background Information
(Complete in Full)
NAME OF APPLICANT CflA1ZL-.&S' I11IS"7 C-L.-SrE
RESIDENCE ADDRESS
BUSINESS NAME (1CJ~$~//ff__
BUSINESS ADDRESS /'i57&> iJA-v'
/1'v.lZJ ./ /Inri
~~ AJc.u,
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION (ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET)
TELEPHONE NUMBER: RESIDENCE BUSINESS 7.0 -~&1'3
PARTNERSHIP ~A/~ ADDRESS
,
PHONE
II. Required Information
(Please check off if included)
Proof of Insurance /i1 AI. j!tJ(/JU/1-t--
Bond U /J ~-IJ A ~'l-e..4-s. (]cJ .
Motor Vehicle Deale~s License is~~te of Minnesota)
f>, L ,/ Cf 00) V,l.. /'A7Pf:S /'1\(,0
Inspections Form (Completed by the City of Andover)
/' Fees Paid
RENEWAL FEE: $500.00
o
o
,
Page 2
19 Junkyard License Application
NOTE: Application will not be accepted unless all ordinance
requirements are met.
I understand that falsification of information requested on this
form or violation of Andover Ordinance No. 44 may be cause for
revocation or suspension of my license.
/f}~ ~~~
~giiature of App ~cant
-------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE USE ONLY
Insurance Expires:
Bond Expires:
LICENSE GRANTED:
LICENSE DENIED:
LICENSE NUMBER AND DATE:
Authorized Signature
o
ORDINANCE *44 (JUN~YARD) CHEC~LIST
CITY OF ANDOVER
DATE
12/)"/t1
NAME OF BUSINESS CO~{./td &ID ftufJ
OWNER/OPERATOR Ch6-,d~, m IS fds~
The following items must be completed prior to the City Council
app~oval of the Junkyard Operator's permit:
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Copy of Current City License
State of Minnesota Auto Dealers License
Proof of Liability Insurance
Proof of Bond
II. OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
Sanitary Condition in Yard
Property Identification Verification
'No Garbage/hazardous Piles in Yard
No Junk within 40 Feet of Curb
No Junk higher than 10 Feet
Open Fire Lanes
No Excessive Combustible Materials
Approved Gas and Oil Removal Process
Bill of Sale, Title Card or Receipt Files
Sale Files
Yard Safety
III. FENCING REQUIREMENTS
o
Eight Feet High at Street Level
Fence Around area that doesn't abut yard
Living Fence on Street Frontage
r O,SSt:S
,,-
---
..,.,-
,....
X-
x,
~
K
)(
~
'/..
y..
."1.. '
"X.
'/.
'/..
'I-
)(
I~{)
.'
o
CITY of ANDOVER
APPLICATION FOR JUNK YARD AND JUNK DEALER'S LICENSE RENEWAL
1990
ALL 1990 APPLICATIONS FOR JUNKYARD LICENSES SHOULD BE RECEIVED NO
LATER THAN FRIDAY NOVEMBER 3, 1989. LATE APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE
CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE:
Y--I/-YC;
I
I. Background Information
(Complete in Full)
NAME OF APPLICANT
RESIDENCE ADDRESS
BUSINESS NAME
BUSINESS ADDRESS
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION (ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET)
TELEPHONE NUMBER: RESIDENCE -7:icY'-SY!,3 BUSINESS -:!57-1/JQ
PARTNERSHIP ADDRESS
PHONE
II. Required Information
(Please check off if included)
Y Proof of Insurance
'/. Bond
)( Motor Vehicle Dealers License (State of Minnesota~
,
/'
Inspectio~~_~~~~Completed by the City of Andover)
Fees Paid
o
RENEWAL FEE: $500.00
o
o
Page 2
19 Junkyard License Application
NOTE: Application will not be accepted unless all ordinance
requirements are met.
I understand that falsification of information requested on this
form or violation of Andover Ordinance No. 44 may be cause for
revocation or suspension of my license.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE: USE ONLY
Insurance Expires: ~_/-?o
Bond Expi res: /-/- 5>()
LICENSE GRANTED:
LICENSE DENIED:
LICENSE NUMBER AND DATE:
Authorized Signature
o
ORDINANCE *44 (JUNKYARD) CHECKLIST
CITY OF ANDOVER
DATE
/2/s* /8"1
NAME OF BUSINESS WI I /zA..r ~ JIl~&
OWNER/OPERATOR ~/d -I- Ju P1-n It WI /~
'. . .....
The following items must be completed prior to the City Council
app~oval of the Junkyard Operator's permit:
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
)(
X_
Copy of Current City License
State of Minnesota Auto Dealers License
Proof of Liability Insurance
Proof of Bond
II. OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
Sanitary Condition in Yard
Property Identification Verification
V'
V
V
V
V'"
1/
v:,
V
.'/
V
~
,.......
.No Garbage/hazardous Piles in Yard
No Junk within 40 Feet of Curb
No Junk higher than 10 Feet
Open Fire Lanes
No Excessive Combustible Materials
Approved Gas and Oil Removal Process
Bill of Sale, Title Card or Receipt Files
Sale Files
Yard Safety
III. FENCING REQurREM~NTS
.v
7
V
Eight Feet High at Street Level
o
Fence Around area that doesn't abut yard
Living Fence on Street Frontage
Voe-5 (lof pass 12/)
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Decmeber 19. 1989
BY:
\, ~)JJ
V. Volk ~,
APPROVED 'OR
AGENDA 1
9)~
BY: '\J
I
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm.
ITEM Authorize Election
NO, Equip. Purchase
8.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
The following is a recommendation by the city Clerks attending a
meeting at Blaine City Hall on December 14, 1989 regarding the
optical scan voting equipment:
INTRODUCTION
Eight Anoka County Cities, representing 75 of the 99 precincts,
entered into a Joint PUrchase Agreement for optical Scan voting
Equipment. Because the cost increases are projected to be
approximately 30% by the 1992 elections, these cities are
recommending purchase of the election equipment for the 1990
elections. Bid proposals were solicited with two vendo~s
responding.
Business Records
Corporation
Unisys
Uni t Prices
50-100 units
$6,200
$5,270
Maintenance Costs
for 2 years
Total Unit Costs
$195/unit
$6,395
$232/unit
$5,502
Prices include vote reader, ballot box, 2 memory cards/packs, and
carrying case.
It should be noted that if the total number of units purchased
exceeds 101, another cost savings of $146 per unit would be
realized.
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,
o
The total cost for equipment for the city of Andover will be
$22,008.00.
It is the concensus of all cities who entered into the Joint
Purchase Agreement that the City Council of Andover authorize the
purchase of Unisys Corporation voting equipment for the 1990
elections conditioned upon a commitment from Anoka County to
assume full responsibility and costs for programming and ballot
preparation needed to support the election equipment for the 1990
elections.
(NOTE: The prices on unisys system hold through January 31,
1990.)
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
December 19, 1989
DATE
ITEM 9. Award Computer
NQ Bid
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard Koolick ~
Finance Director
BY:
APPRC VIDOR
AGEN
,
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff and Committees
The Andover City Council is
information relating to the
accounting system.
V
requested to review the enclosed
bids received for City's financial
REOUEST
BACKGROUND
Over the last 18 months, the City has been investigating its
options relating to the lack of computerized financial records and
the lack of available timely financial data. This process
resulted in the City Council approving bid specifications and
solicitation of bids at the meeting on November 7, 1989. The
specifications were mailed to the following six vendors:
Mentor Systems
NCR Corporation
Fundbalance, Inc.
Computoservice, Inc.
precision Computer Systems
Business Records Corporation
The bid opening was held on December 11, 1989 at 2:30 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers. The City received bids from three of the
above vendors: Business Records Corporation, Fundbalance, Inc.,
and Computoservice, Inc. The other three firms did not contact
the City. There are two ather firms, Big Sky Data Systems and
Banyon Data Systems, who were not sent bid specifications because
they do not have systems or staffing that meet the support needs
of the City as outlined in the specifications. Since software
support was deemed extremely important in evaluating and choosing
software, these two companies were not contacted.
The basis of evaluation was included in the specifications. The
following page and a quarter is recap of these criteria.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
o TO
SECOND BY
City Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
o
Basis for Evaluation
The City will review and evaluate all proposals submitted in
response to this document. Vendors may be eliminated from
consideration for failure to fully comply with the
specifications. The selection will be based on the proposal
deemed to be the most cost benefit effective while meeting the
specifications responsibly, based on, but not limited to, the
following: availability and quality of application software;
hardware serviceability; ease of operation; upward expandability
in terms of maximum capacity of processor and peripherals.
The basis of evaluation will include the following
considerations:
a. The vendor's performance record to date in meeting the
requirements of their existing customers.
b. The amount of vendor support that will be available for
modifications as they are needed, required or requested.
c. The financial stability, longevity and strength of the
vendor.
d. The proven, existing application systems the vendor has
now for immediate implementation. The vendor's
capabilities in other system areas will be treated as a
positive factor.
e. The cost of the system to include costs incurred
indirectly, as well as those billed directly by the
vendor.
f. The internal controls provided within the system which
prevent unauthorized access to data and provide adequate
audit trail.
g. The operational flexibility during periods of system
failure due to mechanical malfunctions (i.e.,
reorganizations after a lightning strike).
h. The availability of users in the area to allow reference
investigation.
o
i. The quality of system, program, operator and user
documentation provided.
j. Adherence to the requested proposal format. This
includes the thoroughness of the proposal as well as the
format of presentation.
k. Equipment capacities, capabilities, and features.
1. Hardware/software service capability.
m. Equipment and software modularity and ease of upgrade.
city Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
o
n. The experience required and number of data processing
personnel needed to operate and maintain the system.
o. The number, type and experience of local vendor staff.
p. The portion of the total system that the vendor will
provide in terms of equipment, installation, conversion,
software, education and training support, software
support and equipment maintenance service.
q. Timely delivery of proposed system (hardware and
software).
r. The capability to perform conversion of existing utility
billing data files.
EVALUATION OF BIDDERS
The following is an analysis of the three bids received. The
letters preceding each comment equate to the above criteria.
FUNDBALANCE, INC.
GENERAL COMMENTS - Total bid price of $21,938.00. Bid bond
received totaled $539.00. Hardware supplier in st. Paul was
to furnish additional bid bond, however it was not received as
of the bid opening. The bid bond, in an amount of $512, was
received in the mail on Tuesday.
a. I contacted the cities of Farmington, Roseville and
Deephaven. All three were very happy with system and
company, however Deephaven has just begun implementation.
It should be noted that the vendor also include Pine City
as a reference in the Twin Cities area. Pine City is
located in Pine County on 35W.
b. The basic software proposed does not meet 17 of the
specifications. The vendor did not include the cost
to develop these and approximate availability dates as
requested by the City.
c. The vendor included financial information in their
bid, however, the City requested the most recent audited
financial statements to ascertain the financial stability
of the company. The audited statements carry more
credibility than just financial data.
d.
Vendor's software is all ready for use.
new software being developed or current
significantly modified.
No indication of
software being
e.
Total bid price of $21,938.
training which will probably
included is one day for each
Ann Arbor Michigan
Does not include all
be necessary. Training
package at their office in
o
City Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
o
f. Audit trail appears to be adequate. Internal controls
are not adequately described to make a judgement.
g. No mention in specifications. This is mainly a hardware
issue and no hardware information was furnished.
h. Four users in Twin Cities. Cities of Roseville,
Deephaven, Farmington and Lexington. All four are pleased
with software and company. With the exception of
Roseville, all other cities are under 5,000 population.
i. Bid indicates no program documentation available.
j. The proposal is lacking in a number of areas. It gives
the appearance of being "slapped" together at the last
minute. Items not included in proposal include copies of
resumes of key personnel, implementation schedule, method
of software-support, hardware information and availability
to upgrade, sample of contracts and other data.
k. No information on equipment is provided.
1. No information on service capability is provided.
m. No information on upgrading is provided.
n. Based on data provided, there is no method to determine
personnel needs. However, discussions with users indicate
that it is a system that needs only minor experience to
manage.
o. No local vendor staff noted. Software vendor is located
in Ann Arbor Michigan. Hardware vendor is in st. Paul.
p. No description of which portions Michigan company will be
responsible for and which part hardware vendor will
supply.
q. No implementation schedule given.
r. Not available.
General Feel For Companr - Company has been around since 1973.
Their users talk very hlghly of the support given. Hardware is
networked PC's. The training included in the bid is most likely
not adequate to allow City staff thorough understanding of
software. The cost and time of maintaining a network should the
City ever desire to put all City staff on this system can be very
expensive. Bid documents do not evoke trust in the company since
therare incomplete and lack detail.
o
city Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award computer Bids
o
COMPUTOSERVICE, INC.
GENERAL COMMENTS - Total bid cost of $46,997.00. Total bid bond
received of five percent of total bid. Hardware configuration
is as follows: IBM PS/2 Model 80-311, three monochrome
monitors, one color monitor, tape drive, Quickwriter printer
and, MultiTech Modem. Software includes SCO XENIX Operating
System, Fund and Budget Accounting Software, Accounts payable,
payroll, utility Billing, and Report Writer.
a. Computoservice has 33 clients in Minnesota and western
Wisconsin. The City of Ramsey, Hopkins, Inver Grove
Heights and Burnsville are all users. Burnsville, with a
population of 50,000, feels it may be out growing the
system. Inver Grove Heights has decided to change
software next year due to general dissatisifaction with
the support and lack of timely response. Both cities have
used the software for six to seven years. Ramsey
implemented the software in 1989. They have had no
problems with the software, but were disappointed in the
training received and the philosophy of users paying for
all updates and upgrading of software. The Finance
Director felt that some of the upgrades were of a basic
nature and should have been included in the maintenance of
the software. Hopkins has been on the software since
1984. They are happy with the system, although wish it
could somethings it currently can't do. The training
they felt was inadequate since it was only one day long.
The support was often slow and at times they were given
wrong answers.
b. The vendors software will need minor modification to
handle the number of street lighting rates. Cost will not
exceed $600. There are other areas of specifications that
the vendor does not meet that would result in additional
cost, although these areas are very minor.
c.
Their
strong,
The Company has been in existence since 1964.
audited financial statements look positive and
indicating the company is financially strong.
d. The vendor has all required application software
available for immediate implementation. The utility
billing package has recently been updated. There are
a number of additional packages available for future
expansion when the City is prepared to add features.
o
e. The total cost is $46,997, broken down as follows:
Hardware $25,336
Software 17,200
Software Support 3,095
Hardware Maint. 136
Training 3,850
Installation 670
Other 1,710
Less Package Discount (5,000)
f. The system has adequate controls and provides an adequate
audit trail.
city Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
o
g. The hardware has the standard protections against down
time.
h. The vendor has a large number of users, with seven in
the Twin Cities. See Section a for analysis of four of
of these users.
i. Bid forms indicate these are available, but no indication
of content or quality is made.
j. The proposal is well put together. Computoservice
followed the requested format and put together a concise
well worded bid.
k.
The equipment configuration is
80. This is a relatively new
of the art personal computer.
expandibility to allow future
printer is of good quality as
screens.
based on an IBM PS/2 Model
machine and is IBM's state
It has adequate
packages to be added. The
is are the four display
l. The hardware and software are both well tested and proven.
m. The hardware and software are easily upgradable and
expandable. The hardware can handle an additional 10MB
of memory (cost of 1,395 per 2MB), an additional memory
expansion card (cost of $1,695) and 315MB of fixed disk.
The vendor recommends up to eight users/output devices on
the PS/2. Should the City desire additional user/output
devices, for example if we decide to put wordprocessing on
the PS/2 and sell the DEC, an additional PS/2 would be
needed to handle the load.
o
n. All software packages are table-driven and designed to
be operated by existing clerical and managerial staff. No
data processing staff is needed. Routine changes can be
made by City staff without program modifications. The
operating system is also made to be used with very little
additional staff or expertise.
o. Total staff 140+. Programming/system analyst, and field
support personnel specializing in utility and city
government applications - 40.
p. Computoservice is the sole provider on the bid. This
provides the City with the ability to have all questions
or problems answered in one phone call.
q. Computoservice is anticipating hardware delivery and
installation will occur in February, 1990. Software
installation and training would be dependent on City
time constraints and hardware installation.
City Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
o
r. Computoservice is willing to aid the City in conversion of
the manual records as well as investigate the potential of
automated conversion of the utility billing files. The
cost of data entry for inputting the manual records is
$15.75/hour. The potential for automating the utility
records is dependent of file layout of both systems.
General Feel for Company - Computoservice, Inc. is located in
Mankato and has been around since 1964. It is a very strong
organization that believes in support and user education. Support
would be through phone conversations and modem when necessary.
The company does not have a toll free phone number, so that the
City can anticipate increased long distance bills. The software
is well tested and would serve the City of Andover well. There
needs to be some concern about the negative reaction from current
users, although a variety of circumstances can cause this.
BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION
o
GENERAL COMMENTS - Total bid cost of $37,900.00. Total bid bond
received of five percent of total bid. Hardware configuration
is as follows: AS/Entry CPU Model S20 (includes tape drive),
one monochrome and one color display station, Quickwriter
printer. Software includes SSP Operating System, Financial
System, Payroll System, utility Billing System and Designer
Reporting Package.
a. Business Records Corporation (BRC) nationwide has over
600 clients. The local office is located in st. Cloud
and currently has 12 installations in Minnesota. In the
Twin Cities, Blaine, Elk River, Columbia Heights and west
st. Paul. Blaine has been on the system since 1985.
They are very happy with system and support and training
are good. Elk River is completing their first year on the
software. The feel the training was excellent and
have been pleased with the support. Also said input was
easy and quick. Columbia Heights was previously on
Computoservice before switching to BRC in 1988. They are
extremely happy with support and training and find the
system easier to use than computoservice's. west St. Paul
has been on the system since 1986. The training and
support were adequate, however, the vendor did not make
the program modifications necessary to generate all the
reports which were required in the specifications. The
City of Champlin as recently contracted with BRC to
purchase hardware and software.
No modifications are needed to make the software meet the
City specifications. Should the City desire
modifications, BRC is available to do them. The cost will
be at BRC's regular rates and will be quoted prior to
beginning work.
b.
c.
The Company has been in existence since 1974.
audited financial statements look positive and
indicating the company is financially strong.
Their
strong,
City Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
o
d. The vendor has all required application software
available for immediate implementation. There are
a number of additional packages available for future
expansion when the City is prepared to add features.
e. The total cost is $37,900, broken down as follows:
Hardware and Software $34,950
Software Support 3,095
Hardware Maint. -0-
(all hardware under at
least 1 year warranty)
Training (included with cost
of software) -0-
Installation (to be done by
City with BRC guidance) -0-
f. The system has adequate controls and provides an adequate
audit trail.
g. The hardware has the standard protections against down
time.
h. The vendor has a large number of users, with several in
the Twin Cities. See Section a for analysis of these
users.
i. Bid forms indicate these are available, but no indication
of content or quality is made.
j. The proposal is well put together. Business Records
Corporation followed the requested format and put together
a concise well worded bid.
1. The hardware and software are both well tested and proven.
m. The hardware and software are easily upgradable and
expandable. The hardware can handle an additional 315 MB
of fixed disk at a cost of $4,765. The CPU will allow a
total of 28 peripheral devices.
n. All software packages are menu-driven and designed to
be operated by existing clerical and managerial staff. No
data processing staff is needed. Routine changes can be
made by City staff without program modifications. The
operating system is also made to be used with very little
additional staff or expertise.
o
o. Total staff 140+ in BRC-Midwest. Five to seven support
personnel are available to support city applications with
an additional six to ten technical professionals for
technical support.
City Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
o
p. Business Records Corporation is the sole provider on the
bid. This provides the City with the ability to have all
questions or problems answered in one phone call.
q. BRC anticipates hardware delivery and installation will
occur in late January or early February of 1990. Software
installation and training is dependent on City time
constraints and hardware installation. BRC estimates that
software training and installation could begin as soon as
early February.
r. Business Records is experienced and willing to aid the
City in conversion of the current records to the new
system. They have not quoted an exact price for the
automated conversion of the utility billing files, since
the cost is dependent on the file organization and format.
Past experience has shown BRC that this process usually
runs around $1,200-$2,400. Their goal is to aid the City
in what ever manner need to facilitate a smooth
conversion of City data, be it automated or manually.
General Feel for Com~ - Business Records has been around for
for 25 years. They nave maintained an office in St. Cloud since
1986, when BRC acquired Computer Concepts and Services, a company
specializing in local government products. The company stresses
its training and support and from discussions with users, these
two phases of the company appear to be excellent. The company
offers free retraining for users under their support agreement.
Support is done by phone, although BRC offers a toll free number.
One area of concern is the hardware. IBM is aggressively
marketing the AS/400 machine. The proposed hardware is the newest
System 36. While it would seem that the vendor would need to
support the software on the system 36, the future is the AS/400.
In addition, a third terminal would make the system more usable,
although the configuration with two terminals is adequate for now.
COPIES OF ALL THREE BIDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR YOUR REVIEW AT CITY
HALL.
FUNDING AVAILABLE
The following is a summary of the available funding sources.
Remaining proceeds and interest earned
from 1987 Equipment Certificates
of Indebtedness
Amount remaining in Equipment Fund
Total available
$23,673.20
$22,397.55
$46,070.75
o
The bids as presented do not include potentially needed furniture,
a printer cover to squelch noise and the exact amount of cabling
needed. These items will be in addition to the bid price.
Any funds remaining after the purchase of the equipment should be
transferred to the General Fund to offset the costs incurred with
repairing the public works grader. Council had previously
discussed that a portion of the funds in the Equipment Fund were
for self-insuring the grader.
City Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
c:> BASIS FOR CITY SELECTION
In purchasing a computer system (or any other type of equipment),
the City needs to weigh the cost and benefit of each proposal.
The lowest cost alternative is not always the best choice for the
City. The Handbook for Minnesota Cities states that the City must
award the bid to the "lowest responsible bidder." The handbook
goes on to define lowest responsible bidder as the ". . . lowest
bidder most likely, in regards to skill, ability, and integrity,
to do faithful, conscientious wor~, and to promptly fulfill the
contract according to the agreements."
The bid specifications were written in such a manner that if
complied with, all proposals would be in the same format and
contain the same information. This was done to allow equal
evaluation of all bids. Bidders were warned that bids that did
not conform to specifications may be eliminated from further
consideration. Vendors were further warned that the quality of
the proposal would be viewed as a basic indication of the vendor's
general competance and technical ability.
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION
Based on the evaluations of all bids it is the recommendation of
the City Finance Director that the bid of Fundbalance, Inc. be
rejected as not comforming to the specifications for the following
two reasons:
1. At the time of bid opening, the bid bond was not
sufficient; and
2. The bid documents did not conform to the required format
nor did the bid contain all required information to be considered.
This makes Business Records Corporation the low bidder. It is the
belief of the Finance Director that they are also the lowest
responsible bidder for the following reasons:
1. The bid documents conformed to the required format and
contained all the information required for proper evaluation;
2. The proposed hardware and software meet the City's
requirements as outlined in the specifications; and
3. The vendor's performance in similar contracts has been
adequate.
o
city Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
Award Computer Bids
o
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Reject all bids and rebid the purchase.
2. Reject all bids and discontinue discussion on the
acquisition of a new computer system.
3. Reject the bid of Fundbalance, Inc. based on its being
deficent as discussed above and award the bid to Business
Records Corporation for the reasons stated above, and
instruct the Finance Director to begin negotiating the
necessary contracts.
4. Request the Finance Director to contact Fundbalance, Inc. to
discuss the missing elements of their bid and return to
Council with this information.
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n9~9mbgr 19, 1909
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
Commis i
ITEM Award Bids
NQ Recycling Containers
10.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY: Cindy
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to consider the Bid Proposals
for recycling containers.
BACKGROUND
Two bids were received for curbside recycling containers. Rehrig
Pacific Co. and Homeland Products, representing Shamrock's
recycling container. Rehrig'S container is $1.81 less than
Shamrock's. Differences of the two containers:
Shamrock - 3000 @ $7.65 = $22,950
Rehrig - 3000 @ $5.84 = $17,520
5 year factory warranty
One year warranty, 20% annual
decrease of coverage
20 gallon size
Drop test from six feet, 40# load
no damage
Storage available for two months
18 gallon size
Drop test from six feet, no
load, some damage
No storage available
Bottom demensions are similar, Shamrock is 7/8" deeper.
RECOMMENDATION
The recommendation that I have is to buy the Shamrock Curbside
Recycling Container. Since residents won't be able to receive the
containers immediately after delivery, the containers need to be
stored. The warranty is better and the size is a little more.
Service should also be better since the Shamrock container is made
in Minnesota and the Rehrig comes from Illinois.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
o TO
SECOND BY
TABULATION OF BIDS
o
PROJECT: f7 e (L{ ell t~ d 31n S
BIDS OPEN: ;2,'5i:'pm
I-? /1 '-I / f- '!
CONTRACTOR
P & S BID
Ret'd BOND
TOTAL BID
f8":fI A-)
, . B) .
a:, .::io...l. f-h !:^d<...--ku Is
i) . 5/t?lm~
t/\....,/\/ l~" ---.,/\~\--/
/-) - 'SJtf Iu III f
I {a,I Ice, '?v c.:..:c. ,'ro..;'.
iPo <7" 6 Vlllv-./+/ ,"-"'(i~<.r;c 06 (O"-<''':;j~
Size
2)~1,)
;1)0
d- . / -
f(/, tef S;& 7{;)/ ilfid
-$;)295b
.........\ I
\ ---, --------\ -/.\ ~"---:-\ --_/, ----..-,
11 / \
B - 7 0J /LU'lA.-:t
.
.-
S- L. Re<I' ?CC! '70 {.<){J..r,'Ci.Y\.-J-..,
I
((( C' ~{1QY15
- dO 6A (0Y1.5
-;);0 ksl- (;l,/() dcz.tv7Uc' ~ )
4/ol/!-s. ~a.d'
-31;'" F *5.1-
S" n,f 6.. c,--", /} (,Iad Ci..!J..G
f./ ' .......
131) h7JYY/ ,(Jr1?1.d?'7 Si~iY1 ,-
It
/3 % h~cyL x d,/ %-Ul/~X /'--/:j/deer'
-- /O(a...( COYt-f-a.cl- -'1eS
I
u'
Dre fes-j- (;JY>U
-- . dD C F -!e<;-!-
-. No 5tm-I1JR AV6-G-1a.6/e
&,.,IhY>") })/~<;IO'y)
/3 II hJL x' ;J()~ t.<.J/de K /t../ 'c/ze,c;
la c()../ eM-fa. cf - ;(/0
~~ '~rr1- :;:"'17, 5z.o~
30fn)& ? ~S- :=. .12. 2,.9 so~
-~l:ir....".L.~""tJ I . "lli~aa-t-=
o
o
o
\
~~ '
L' .
~e~rht 'adfi{ ~omllan~
~ December 13, 1989
CITY OF ANDOVER
l685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, Minnesota
N.W.
55304
Dear City of Andover:
On behalf of Rehrig Pacific Company, we appreciate the
opportunity to bid on the City of Andover's requirements for
curbside recycling containers. Having been fortunate to be an
active supplier of recycling containers in the Twin Cities' area,
and throughout the country, we are excited at the possibility of
providing our containers for your recycling program.
Rehrig Pacific Company is confident that the business we have
secured is due to our ability to provide a sturdy, quality
designed bin and on-time delivery and service. Also, we feel the
convenient-to-use design and large volume capacity benefits
programs by enhancing participation and the volume of recyclables
collected.
We are pleased to submit the enclosed proposal. Some comments
regarding the standard terms and conditions/requirements:
l. Our price for the HuskyLite 18 gallon bin is $5.84 each
delivered. This price includes the unit cost of the bin, a
one-time branding charge to have the same brand on both long
sides of the bin, and freight to Andover, MN.
2. With the inclusion of at least 50% post-consumer recycled
materials, Rehrig Pacific Company will offer a five (5)
declining guarantee which states that under normal use, the
containers will be free from defects in workmanship and
materials on the basis of 100% the first year, and declining
20% every year thereafter.
3. We have included a copy of the drop tests conducted on our l4
gallon container. The proposed container, 18 gallon, mirrors
the 14 gallon in composition, style and design. No tests
have been conducted on the 18 gallon yet, but the enclosed
are representative.
------.-----.-
4. An 18 gallon container has been sent under separate cover for
your review.
5. The following cities/organizations in your area are currently
utilizing our containers:
1850 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE. GURNEE. IlliNOIS 60031/708.249-1505
QUALITY PRODUCTS FOR INDUSTRY SINCE 1913
01 I u:=;",
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100
C.ITY OF ANDOVER
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
The purpose of this request for bid is to provide interested
vendors with the necessary information and specifications to
prepare and submit a bid for 3,000 curbside recycling containers.
Summary of Requirements
It is the intention of the City of Andover to purchase containers
for residents to use for curbside recycling. The design of the
three bag container shall meet the following requirements:
1) Constructed of strong durable plastic that consists of at
~east 50% post-consumer recycled materials.
2) To provide drop test results of up to at least six feet is
necessary.
3) All bidders must submit independent laboratory test results
indicating durability in extreme climate conditions and state
what those conditions are.
4) The containers should be guaranteed for five years against any
workmanship or materials' defects under normal recycling use.
5) The containers shall be printed with the recycling logo and
city name.
6) The container should have at least a twenty gallon capacity.
7) The vendor neads to have the ability to store-the containers
for up to two months while they are being dispensed to residents.
8) Freight should be included in the bid.
o
10
GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS INC. 13931 PARTRIDGE ST. N.W. ANDOVER, MN 55304
612-757-2360 GM
HOMELAND
PRODUCTS
INC.
December ~2, ~989
CITY OF ANDOVER
Recycling Coordinator ~ cindy DeRuyter
1685 Crosstown Blvd., Andover, MN 55304
SUBJ: Bid for curbside Recvclinq containers
Dear Cindy,
GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS, INC., an Andover-based company, appreciates the
opportunity to submit our offer to accommodate the city's needs for
recycling containers as advertised in your request for bids. This
proposal meets or exceeds the requirements in your solicitation
document as outlined below:
o Molded with more than 50 percent of recycled plastic,
o Suited for extreme temperatures (rib~reinforced)
o Capacity of at least 20 gallons (holds 3 grocery bags)
o Guaranteed against any workmanship/material defects (5-years)
o Recycling logo and ANDOVER hot-stamped on two corners.
\.
Further, we will provide two months storaqe of excess containers at
no additional cost. Delivery of excess units to the City Hall will be
at no additional charge. Freight from the factory to Andover is included
in the bid. The containers are identical to the containers utilized by
Blaine's recyclinq proqram (Blaine City Hall, 9150 Central Av. NE,
Blaine, MN 55434,784-6700).
Enclosed is our OFFER summary which also contains some meaningful
options that perhaps no other vendor has considered, such as:
o Hauler/House number identification labels
o Printed recycle/curbside instruction sheets
This proposal also contains a product description sheet of the proposed
unit, a corporate statement describing our company, and an industry-
standard purchase agreement. Also enclosed, per requirements 2 and 3,
are the rigid drop test results and independent laboratory test results
for the proposed containers. This bid document contains proprietary
information and cannot be reproduced or disclosed to third parties
without ,consent from GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS, INC.
If you have any questions about the enclosed offer, please feel free
to contact us anytime. In addition, if the city has other related
needs, our staff is equipped to accommodate these important items.
Sincerely,
~~ L:::-? /IlHj~L~~~
Gary S~aY/Me~~rochniak
GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS, INC.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
\0
o
'0
GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS INC. 13931 PARTRIDGE ST. N.w. ANDOVER, MN 55304
612-757-2360 GM
HOMELAND
PRODUCTS
INC.
PROPOSED OFFER
CURBSIDE RECYCLING CONTAINERS
Model 695/3-Bag Recycling
Container (see Shamrock
product sheet for details)
(*3000 to 4000 Qty. Price)
$7.65 *
Quantity Ext. Price
$22,950
Model/Description
Unit Price
3,000
HOT STAMP PRINTING AT FACTORY
Recycle emblem and the word
ANDOVER in WHITE on two corners.
TERMS
Order Date:
To be determined
Payment Schedule:
Upon delivery to City Hall
or to temporary storage
Warranty Period:
5-year factory warranty
Offer expiration:
Offer subject to change
anytime if manufacturer's
terms change.
Taxes:
Any applicable taxes are
not included in prices.
DELIVERY/STORAGE
Delivery to the Andover City Hall:
(Note, once this order has been placed
with the manufacture, it cannot be
cancelled or delivery deferred.)
units will be delivered in
approximately 30 days.
Two months storage of unused containers:
CONTAINER--USE--~
Goods ordered are to be used for the
expressed purpose of the City's curbside
recycling program.
TOTAL
no charge
TBD
included at
no additional
cost
per factory
schedule
no charge
$22,950
GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS INC. 13931 PARTRIDGE ST. N.W. ANDOVER, MN 55304
612-757-2360 GM
HOMELAND
PRODUCTS
INC.
o
OFFER (PAGE 2)
OPTIONS
1. STICK-ON IDENTIFICATION LABELS
As an option Homeland Products will prepare,
at the City's request, color-coded stick-on
labels (appr. 3" x 5") to identify haulers
and the house number where the container
resides. If for some reason the resident
changes haulers, a new color sticker is made
available by the city to identify the new
hauler. This LABEL must be applied when
container surface is above 40 degrees.
Labels are made of material for outside use.
This method allows the haulers to determine
which containers are destined for pickup
when multiple containers align the street.
House numbers can be applied to the label
using a standard permanent magic marker.
The price for these labels which come in
four colors are as follows (example) :
Color Quantity Price
Red 1,000 $145
White 1,000 $145
Yellow 1,000 $145
Orange 1,000 $145
-----
TOTAL 4,000 $580
2. INFORMATION/INSTRUCTION SHEET
with the City of Andover's input, HOMELAND
PRODUCTS can print 3,000 instructional
one-sheet flyers which can dispersed by the
cith with the 3-bag containers. Recycled
paper will be used.
see below
$580 .
$100
c:> Shamrock is a registered trademark of Shamrock Industries, Inc.
(
,
(
Shamrock Curbside Recycling Containers
Increasing solid waste and decreasing landfill space has resulted in a
growing need for curbside recycling. The high cost of waste disposal along with
environmental concerns has hastened the need for sound recycling programs.
As more communities become involved in recycling, it is obvious that not all
recycling needs are the same. Some prefer stackable containers...others
require a multi-material, 3-bag-in-1 container. That's why Shamrock offers a
choice of recycling containers, all in durable, strong, injection molded plastic,
built to last for years.
Shamrock has a nationally proven track record in quality injection molded
products for over 40 years. Our recycling containers are now being used
across the country in industry as well as residential programs. We take our
recycling concept even one step farther...our containers themselves are
largely recycled plastic. Look to Shamrock...your partner in progress.
All Shamrock Curbside Recycling Containers Are:
o S~rong, dl;lrable injeption molde~, 0 Available in a wide variety of colors
hlgh-aenslty polyethylene plastiC 0 Printed as you cJe!iignCl~eil".ecycling
o Rib reinforced for extra strength logo, contents, city
o Suited for extremes of 0 Molded with a high percentage of
temperature recycled plastic!
o Built with solid wall construction
to minimize consequences of wind,
moisture and ground problems
o Guaranteed against any
workmanship or materials defects
under normal recycling use
o Available in two styles for unique Sham POCIe.
needs · \; INDUSTRIES, IN.CX!> @
Recycling Container Division
an LDI company
Stackable Recycling Container
Our stackable containers are designed to be aesthetically
pleasing while maintaining the recycling container identity. They
stack easily and securely with the traditional cut-out for quick
Jiiosit of recyclable materials. Solid wall construction minimizes
vse littering problems. spills and ground moisture problems.
, ~
~W
Three-Bag Recycling Container
The Three-Bagger is specifically designed to hold 3 expanded
grocery bags in one direction for a multi-material container. Its
height is designed to better protect bags from wind. moisture.
dirt and the elements. Refuse stays where it belongs.. .in the
container!
Printed in U.S.A.
05-60-7-280
1
H
1
o Solid wall construction and feet
minimize consequences of wind,
moisture and ground problems
o Strong double reinforced
handles make carrying easy
o Units stack securely with
interlocking feet
o Large 11.37 gallon capacity
each
o Ribs provide extra strength and
stability
o Four drainage holes in bottom
keep containers cleaner yet
don't let broken items fall out
o Available in a variety of colors
(
Specifications
Model 748
Gallon Capacity: 11.37
Bottom Inside Dimensions:
11"hx 17.50"w x 13.63"d
BottomOutside Dimensions:
12.63"h x 20.63"w x 14.94"d
. Specify color.
(
o Solid wall construction
throughout keeps bags drier,
better protected from elements
o Designed specifically to hold 3
expanded grocery bags in one
direction for multiple uses
o Rounded,off top lip acts as a
comfortable and convenient
handle '
o Built taller than conventional
3-bag units to keep refuse inside
bagsmnot on the ground
o Available in a variety of colors
Specifications
Model 695
Gallon Capacity: 20.95
Top Inside Dimensions:
13 7{S"hx24"wx 171/4"d ________
Bottom Inside Dimensions:
137/S"hx211/4"wx141/4"d
.Specify color.
Shamrock@ Industries! Inc.
Shamrock Curbside Recycling...
Your Partners in Progress.
834 North 7th Street
Minneapolis. MN 55411-4394, U.S.A.
[6121332-2100; 1 800822-2342 [Toll Free]
1 800822-2343 [In Minnesota]
c
o
GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS INC. 13931 PARTRIDGE ST. N.W. ANDOVER, MN 55304
612-757-2360 GM
HOMELAND
PRODUCTS
INC.
~QRPQRATE SUMMARY
GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS, INC. is a specialty pr-oducts company whose main
pur-pose is to pr-ovide cost-effective and pr-oductive pr-oducts to value-
conscious individuals, communities, and business customer-s which cover-s a
wide-r-ange of r-equir-ements. HOMELAND PRODUCTS began its oper-ations in the
second quar-ter- of 1989 with dir-ect focus water- pr-eser-vation needs
lsubsur-face ir-r-igation), human-assist car-e pr-oducts, inter-mediate
r-ecycle container-s, novelty NEON displays, ener-gy alter-native
pr-oducts, along with miscellaneous suppor-t pr-oducts. Each specialty
is descr-ibed br-iefly below.
SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION
Mor-e and mor-e people ar-e concer-n about water-pr-eser-vation in one for-m or-
another-,. As r-esult, many homeowner-s or- commer-cial pr-oper-ty owner-s with
lawns ar-e looking to the futur-e for- mor-e effective lawn ir-r-igation
systems. HOMELAND PRODUCTS has that pr-oduct today that satisfies this
demand. A low maintenance, under-gr-ound distr-ibution system that doesn't
use spr-inkler- heads. It places water- wher-e the lawn needs it, in the r-oot
zone. HOMELAND PRODUCTS is an exclusive supplier- in our- nine county ar-ea.
Subsur-face ir-r-igation is also gr-eat for- gar-dens and agr-icultur-e.
HUMAN-ASSIST CARE
HOMELAND PRODUCTS is an author-ized dealer- for- the nation's top
manufactur-er- of liftchair-s, electr-ic scooter-s, and wheelchair-s
available in the industr-y today. We pr-ovide a unique Shop-at-home
ser-vice for- anyone who ar-e unable to travel-shop to multiple locations
for their impor-tant car-e-assist needs.
ENVIRONMENTAL/RECYCLE
Our- company ser-ves as a broker- for r-ecycling componentsnecessar-y for-
communities to implement r-ecycling pr-ogr-ams in their- city. We have
access to a widest array of manufacturer-s in the industry. Because of
our- low overhead organization, we can pr-ovide our- customer-s with
extr-emely cost-effective products within their- limited tax allocations
and funding measur-es, which gives them mor-e buying power- for- each
consumer- dollar-.
o
o
o
CORPORATE SUMMARY (CONT'D)
NEON DISPLAYS
HOMELAND PRODUCTS specializes in attractive, novelty NEON signs for
business, home, car/camper, or dozens of other amazing uses. We think
our NEONs are built by best NEON sign manufacturer in Minnesota. They
only use high quality material and components which far surpass many
novelty sign producers. These signs are sold by mail-order only with an
excellent warranty program on each unit. Best of all, our prices are
hard to beat anywhere (from the east coast to the west coast). You can
expect to pay a lot for a good novelty NEON sign, but not from HOMELAND
PRODUCTS.
ENERGY ALTERNATIVES (SOLAR)
The rise and fall of energy demands is a constant battle. We all know one
thing, that the price of energy seems to rise more often then fall. As
result, HOMELAND PRODUCTS has positioned itself to be 'a key supplier of
Energy Systems, specifically, solar-powered systems for the 19905. Solar
energy is once again.a energy alternative that is right for many
applications. The wide range of products offered by HOMELAND PRODUCTS
is the best source of solar products in this area.
-..".~,~'" ' .'. ~~ .
.;'yf~,~,:;::;~....:~~;~..:::,::..~:~.,.... ~;',>.-, _,;'
; ~~;~~.;~:}l~t~~}l}ii:f;i~:f~)~:';
,~__._ _.,~:YfdiB~a~:~:i~~~r~L.~,~
'.. ","r..
-... '>. ~.'
-.: :c: ..;:--;::.~.
"
.. ~~:~:;: ':
.-.
---
. ---
---
--
--
--
--
Package Testing Services
o
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OBJECTIVE
3
TEST SAMDLE DESCRIPTION
3
TEST PROCEDURES MID RESULTS
~ ~
j-:J
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES
6
APP'NJ IX I
7
Photoqraphs
8
'0
. ~ . . ~ w ~.w _ "'~.:
~ .... -- .
""IP'f"J ,~ l) S /,.
'-=--:
---
---
--
--
--
--
--
Package Testing Services
o
OBJECTIVE
Report: 51049
Page: 3
Date: July 14, 19S9
To subject the Shamrock Polyethylene 3-Bag Tote Bin "B" to drop testing, using ASTM 0775
, Standard Test Method for Drop Test for Loaded Boxes as a guideline.
TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Shamrock Polyethylene 3-Bag Tote Bin "B"
TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
?T----...,. ~===--u~~.\
[ J1DlLHJJlLD.1LJ.LO...DJl.C, n n; V\,l !,
L:.. - '\ , !I i
. 0 [2Jill
~' !igil.,i
1,1.., II!
II J I
o ~ III
J ""li!
pi
1~;<Ji
Testing was completed by Packag-e-Test;ng Services, an operating unit of Ecolab Inc. on
July 14, 1989.
o
~;' ':;'''>j~C0:033:;
Pnrlot:!l in l).:;"..^.
'- - -' Package Testing Services
! 0"
Report: 51049
Page: 4
Date: July 14, 2939
TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
DROP TESTING
Sample Size
6 Tote Bins
Drop Orientations
Flat on Bottom
Diagonal on Bottom Corner
Drop Heiqhts
48" (4')
72" (6')
Drop Seauence
Test Load
40 lbs. - Bundled Newspaper
1 4811 Fl at on Bottom
2 - 72" Fl at 0 n Bottom
3 - ,13" Diagonal on Bottom Conler
4 - 7?1I Diagonal on Bottom Corner
,,-
Equipment
(1) Yale forklift
(1) Cald\'lell Co., ( ton capacity brace
(1) Manual release mechanism
(2) Container orientation sling
Conditioninc;
-30JF for 24 Hours
Test Standard
ASTM 0775 Standard Test Method for Drop
Test for Loaded Boxes, IJsed as a guid~line
~eslJlts
Flat on Bottom Diagonal on Bottom
Sample Drop Orientation Corner Orientation*
No. 48" 72" 48" 72"
1 Pass Pass Pass Pass
2 Pass Pass Pass Pass
3 Pass Pass Pass Pass
4 Pass Pass Pass Pass
5 Pass Pass Pass Pass
6 Pass Pass Pass Pass
* The Tote Bin was ad ented at a 100 angle from the impact surface.
Inspection Criteria: Each test sample \~as inspected follol'ling each drop.
Definition of Failure: Th~ tote containers were inspected for any break in the continuity
of the material. Specifically, a crack or chip qllalifi,:~ as "
failure. Any a1)rasions or scuff marks reslIl tin'] f:'O'l1 t:"c t:'3 ':~:1;
were not accounted for.
Average Time to Complete each Drop Test/Inspection Sequence: 5.4 minutes
\0
. 7 ~ ..... .' :.' " '''.'or,
i''''',,,r -,'f",',
'"- - -' Package Testing Services
v
Report: 51049
, Pi\~JP.: 5
Date: July 14, 1989
o
TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
CONCLUSION
'--
The Drop Testing performed at Package Testing Services was carried out using AST11 0775
Standard Test Method for Drop Test for Loaded Boxes as a guideline. Six test sample Tote
Bins \~ere initially conditioned to -300F, for 24 hours. Follo~ling the conditioning
'peri ad, each test sample was removed from the freezer and immed i i\ tel y 1 oaded \~i th 40 1 bs.
and subsequently tested. The drop testing consisted of the Following sequence:
1 - 48" Flat on Bottom Drop Test
2 - 72" Flat on Bottom Drop Test
3 - 48" Diagonal on Bottom Corner Drop Test
4 - 72" Diagonal on Bottom Corner Drop Test
,
Following each drop in the test sequence, the individual sample was visually inspected for
any evidence of cracking or chipping. Any evidence of a crac~ or chip to a test container
\1aS recorded as a failure. The time of each drop/inspection sefjuence \'/ilS al so recotded.
Timing commenced upon removal of the test sample from the freezer. The indi'lidual res'I':O:
are referenced on page 4.
/---! ....-~
-.-'--j (/ // ~
. /7 /7/'// /' ,.,.~..--;~:!/ -'"
<--- -_.// /' ~M;r0 /.' 1..4 '-'/
/>James D. Lotll .
Packaging Technologist
o
.. .4~ "..,,... 4....
,.... ,",.. ,":-:
Prm:r:'l if1 1J.~:./\
",
Report: 51049
Page: 6
D<:\b;: July1ti,
1 ()O ()
.~ .' ',) -
......:,.. -' Package Testing Services
(0'
DISCLAIMER OF HARRANTIES
Ecolab Inc.' s Packaging Testing Services certi Fies that the previously
described testing services have been performed in accordance with standad
good laboratory practices.
ALL OTI IER H,~!(Ri\11TI ES, EXPRESSED OR I~1i'LI ED,
INCLUDING ANY HARRANTY THAT THE PACKAGING TESTED IS MERCHANTABLE, FIT FOR A
PARTI CULAR PURPOSE OR IN co.~1PLIANCE ~JITH Any FEDERAL OR STATE REGUU\TIONS, AR~
DISCLAH1ED.
In no event shall Ecolab Inc.'s Packaging Testing Services
Liability exceed the total amount paid by Shamroc'< Industries, Inc. for
services rendered.
o
. ,.-~ -,. f' , ,'.r)
i'ri"":'I::.II'.,\,
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATE
GM
HOMELAND
PRODUCTS
INC.
GM HOMELAND PRODUCTS INC. 757-2360
BOX 251 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55303-- .
......
.. Name
S
0 Address
L
D
T City State_ Zip
0 Phone (
S Name ,
H Address
II
p
T City State_ Zip
0 Phone (
(
Quantity Product # Serial # Description Unit Price Total
I I
I
I
, i I
I I
!
Special Instructions:
SubTotal
Delivery
Assembly
Tax
Total
,-
Deposit
Balance Due
FQR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received
Deposit Amt.
Check #
Dep. Date
Customer #
Comment
Enter Date
Initialed
Date
NOTE: Some
states require us Signature of Purchaser
to notify custom-
ers of a 72 Hour Sales Representative
Right of Reci-
sion.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
OF
HONELAND PRODUCTS (SELLER)
--
QTERMS AND CONDITIONS. '
e terms and conditions set forth herein constitute all agreements between the SELLER a.nd BUYER forthe purchase of goOds and supersede all prior
correspondence. quot~tions. and other communications. elth~roral orwellian. Acceprance is expressly limited to the ferms'and"conditions herein. These terms and conditions may be
changed only by a writing signee by an executive officer of Seller at Seller's location shown on the front hereof. The Uniform Commercial code of Minnesota governs this lransactlon.
2. CHANGES IN SPECIFICATIONS.
All requests for changes in specifications alter orders are Placeo shall be made in wriling and must 08 accepted in writing by Supplier. at its soJe option. to be effecilve.
3. CANC~LLATlON. DEFERMENT OF DELIVERY.
No order is subject to cancellation or deferment ot delivery.
4. SUSPENSION OF CREDIT.
Supplier may suspend credit and shipment of goods ordered when. in its judg~ent, the financial condition at Customer warrants such action.
5. CONTINGENCIES.
Execution of all orders is contingent upon fires. strikes and all other causes beyond Supplier's reasonable control. If. because of any such event, SUPplier is unable to supply the total de.
mand forthe goods. Supplier may allocate its available supply of 9.oads. without obligation to purchase similar goods from other sources. among itself and all of its customers. inCluding
those not under contract. on such basis as It determines 10 be eQUItable:
6. PRICES.
Pnces are subject to change at any time. All prices are Quoted F.Q.B. Supplier's plant localion. Prices may not include tax, Prices are subject to an increase '!!quallO any amount of tax
which Supplier may be required to collect or pay upon the sale at the goods. If not included on the original invoice for such goods. such amount may be inVOiced later.
7. PAYMENT.
SUBJECTTO SUPPLIER'S CONTINUING APP!=!OVALOF CUSTOMER'S CREDIT. AND UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, MODIFIED OR SUPPLEMENTED ON THE FACE HEREOF.
CUSTOMER SHALL PA Y FOR ALL GOODSON. THE FOLLOWING TERMS: 1 Q/Q.iO, NET THIRTY (301 DAYS: LATE PAYMENT CHARGE OF THE MAXIMUM LEGAL RATE ALLOWABLE. UP TO
ONE AND ONE,HALF PERCENT (11(2 %) FOR EACH THIRTY (30) DAYS OR PART HEREOF MAYBE ADDED.
8. SHIPMENT AND ACCEPTANCE.
Any expon or other special packaging or transportation Charge WIll be added to lhe price. and will be invoiced to and paio by Customer when they occur. Supplier will not be responsible for
any freight. Iransponation. insurance, shipping, storage. hanaling. demurrage or similar charge.
Buyer will be resPol'!sible for examining goods immediately upon aeHvery by carrier. Buyer must advise the carrier and Seller of damages or shortages DtlOr to Buyer's accePtance of the
gOods from the carner and, with the exception. oT.latent defects, WIll ~dvise Seller of any claIm with resoect to any damages or S,hOrtages Within ten 110l days after receiving goods. Buyer's
lallure 10 advise the camer and Seller shall relieve Seller from any claim by Buyer for any Shortages oraamages and Shall constitute a waiver by Buyer of any claIms against the gOods. The
responsibility for processing claims with the carner far transportation damages and/or shortages rests with Buyer.
No order is Subject to deferment of delivery Without consent In wnting between Seller and Buyer.
No claim shall be allowed nor credit given for goods returned without Suppliers written authority, A restOCking charge of fifteen percent (15%) of the price may be imposed for returned
gOOds.
Unless the indicated shipping date is expressly guaranteed. advance information as to date at shipment is an approximation only, based upon Suppliers best jUdgment at the time.
Customer's acceptance ofdeHvery will constitute a waiver of any and all claims for any losses or damages due to delay,
9. WARRANTIES.
THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES COVERING THE GOODS. ALL WARRANTIES. EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE HEREBY EXCLUDEO.
10. SECURITY INTEREST.
Suppliershall retain a security interest in all goods purchased by Customer until all sums owing are fully paid. The security interest shall include any proceeds realized by Customer upon
the sale ot sue" goods.
Should Customer be in any detaun. or should Customer's financial responSibility be reasonably deemed by ~upplierto be unsatisfactory, the entire balance owing shall. at Supplier's elec.
tlon, become immediately payable without notice and Supplier may, in addition to other lawful remedies. S8lZ8 such goods without leqal process and. at Supplier's option, ~i~her retain
them in full satisfaction at Supplier's obligations hereunderordisposeot 5uch goods at publiC or private sale. retaining from the mOnies realized therefrom an amount suffICient to pay Ihe
balance due. plus the expenses of retaking and resale. and reasonable attorney's tees. Any surplus realized by Supplier on such resale shall be returned to Customer but Customer shall reo
main liable for any deficiency.
11. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL SUPPUER BE UABLE FOR ANY CLAIM FOR LOST PROFITS. LOSS OF GOODWILL. OR CDNSEOUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OF ANY
KINO FOR ANY AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE PRICE FOR THE SHIPMENT INVOLVED. " '
12. APPLICABLE LAW.
All contracts hereunder shall be considered entered into under the laws of the State ot Minnesotaand sllall be construed in accordance with the laws of that State. Customer agrees to
promptly pay all damages. interest. costs. costs at collection and reasonable attorney's tees incurred in enforcing any of the provisions at this agreement. Customer also agrees to waive all
defensesot lack at jurisdiction and insufficiency of service of process. .
13. RECEIVING FACILITIES.
Customsr agrees to furnish and maintain safe and adequate facilities in all respects, meeting all requirements of all applicable governmental laws, rules or regulations, fo~ receiving and
unloading deliveries of and storing any goads delivered hereunder and Customer hereby releases Supplier from any liability far, and agrees to indemnify and dele':ld. Supplier on account of.
any claim for injury to or death ot persons or damage to property in any manner reSUlting from or based upon Customer's failure to comply with the foregoing prOVISion,
14. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
GOOdS purchased hereunder are not to be used in packaging hazardous materials as classified under Federal Regulation Code 49 unless specifically stated otherwise,
15. SEPARABILITY.
If any provision hereof Is. or becomes. violative of orco'nuary to any applicable law or rule. order or regulation issued, Supplier may, at its option, either cancel such provision. without effect
upOn other provisions. or terminate runtler de!iverjes in.theirentirety.
16. ASSIGNMENT.
Customer's right to purchase any gOOds hereunder is neither transferable nor assignable by Customer without Suppliers pnor w,itten consent.
17. REMEDIES.
In ttle event of any breach ~y Customer of any 0' th8-pro~i;~~sot t~is or any of Ihe proviSions of any contract resulting hereunder, Supplier may, in additil?n to any other rights or remedies
it may have at law or In equity, Suspend delivenes nereunderorcancellhe contract resullingherefrom without any liability for any alleged damages resultm9 therefrom.
18. ARBITRATION.
At Supplier's sole option, any controvarsy orclalm arising out of or relating tothis contract. crthe breach the'eol. shall be settled by arbitration in ac~ordance witt! the Commercial Arbitra.
lion Rules of the American Arbitration ASSOCiation and jUdgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any Court having IUrlsdlctlon thereof.
GUSE
ds are to be used tor the express purpose of resale. reuse, or sale to stated buyer and their customers. and are not to be used far purposes at obtatning competitive bids, copies. like
duct imItations from ather vendors of similar Droducts.
BY TERMS WHICH ARE
NOTE, THESE TERMS
REVISED ON THE
APPLY UNLESS SUPERCEDED
OFFER PAGE.
10
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
November 27, 1989
The City of Andover is accepting bids from distributors
of curbside recycling containers. The enclosed request
for bids outlines the product specifications.
We look forward to receiving additional information from
your company. If you have additional questions, contact
me at Andover City Hall at 755-5100.
"I "0 /1
G;' Jl' ,) ,
., i ! '" --I.-
, ,'K1c( I L-Ic...v---~-Ji.-'L
Cindy DeRuyter
Recycling Coordinator
Enclosure
(0
Submission of Bids
Sealed bids will be received by the City no later than 2:30 p.m.
on December 14, 1989. Bids will not be accepted after this time.
The City will not be responsible for late mail deliveries.
Proposals shall be clearly marked: Bid for Curbside Recycling
Containers.
Vendors shall provide name, address, and phone number of at least
one other municipality now using the containers. The City of
Andover may make such investigations as deemed necessary to
determine the ability of vendors to meet the requirements of
these specifications.
The City has the right to reject any or all bids.
(
o
Y\ ",..,.."~''''''I):,,,
7~ ~
/'>,
.f <'~
O,_~
(O~.l )
"t~~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
The purpose of this request for bid is to provide interested
vendors with the necessary information and specifications to
prepare and submit a bid for 3,000 curbside recycling containers.
Summary of Requirements
It is the intention of the City of Andover to purchase containers
for residents to use for curbside recycling. The design of the
three bag container shall meet the following requirements:
1) Constructed of strong durable plastic that consists of at /
least 50% post-consumer recycled materials.
2) To provide drop test results of up to at least six feet is v'.
necessary.
3) All bidders must submit independent laboratory test results V
indicating durability in extreme climate conditions and state
what those conditions are.
4) The containers should be guaranteed for five years against any v
workmanship or materials' defects under normal recycling use.
5) The containers shall be printed with the recycling logo and /
city name.
6) The container should have at least a twenty gallon capacity. /
7) The vendor neftds to have the ability to store the containers /
for up to two months while they are being dispensed to residents.
8) Freight should be included in the bid.
./
'0
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE npl"!pmhtor 1 Q 1 QAQ
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
FOR
Engineering
ITEM
NO. 11. Award Bid/89-24;
Comm. Park Pond
BY:
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
the bids for Project 89-24, Commercial Park Pond.
The City received 12 bids ranging from $15,627 to $73,925.
The low bidder is Moser Construction Company at $15,627.00.
The engineer's estimate was $27,775.00.
Moser Construction Company did the watermain project from the
tower to 150th Lane by the school.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 89-24 FOR COMMERCIAL PARK POND
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF COMMERCIAL PARK.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in
Council Resolution No. 191-89, dated November 21, 1989, bids were
received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as
follows:
Moser Construction Co.
Arnt Construction Co. Inc.
Imperial Developers Inc.
$15,627.00
$17,117.50
$20,969.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate Moser
Construction Co. as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with Moser Construction Co. in the amount
of $15,627.00 for construction of the improvements; and direct the
City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their
bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed
and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n9v9mb9r 19, 1909
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
('n' ~--~~_ '
APPRONV~E~D FOR
AGEN A
\
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Parks
~~
BY: \\ ~
ITEM
NO. 12. Rose Park
Discussion
BY: 'T'nnn:r u..~_
The City Council is requested to consider the installation of a
security light at Rose Park as requested by the area residents and
the Park and Recreation Commission per their meeting December 7,
1989.
Currently, under the Park and Recreation General Budget (repair,
maintenance, supplies and landscaping) the City has ~ balance of
$447.92. The one time charge for installation of the light would
be approximately $150-$200. There will be a continuing monthly
charge for energy and maintenance which is a normal charge on all
of the security lights.
The light would be used for the skating rink. The kids get home
from school around 4:00 p.m. By the time the kids get to the rink
it is dark. Attached is a letter from a resident near Rose Park.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
o
o
/ h9--8 -f9 .
In U; T- jilt-I
! ~L ();:"- j ,r .' l~."~
i?twL (JtuJ2. ~ i-IC--/tn_Lf_/hnq ~~ ,
~ cJ-JL::L J-z~ On:. ,',uO., tAL
/J'LL.U.,J) f-!::t 1', ;t: ~ ,
n..c-ur~"0..2:- 'z.~ W ~ / ~
G..-nv Wrfl.~f'-.-! CDh ~ aiJ..-(y--<--L-t; ~ '
1U; JthrYq ~ tAu fttl/Jz I .
#50 dJ:CL,~, Gl ~~, f:JJJ .4f:a-LchQ
'~~l~j-;(j/i:tt /JU.~ ~~
fl ~ ~ 4: f--5f PH Ju f..CLUA-L'~'
~~J
, (j~ Q~ /}n.LJ QA,; to l..u-..Acut
:~ ~ fJj do .i:D .YX-F~~
:~Uafl <gP-o~9 -4A:L:n'ff
:.~ /\~(f~/ {} ()
: ~ ~ Ljo-wu J+ to/J'Yl~
. f?~ f&ue) ~ I ',~cL} QAL./
!~ ~ I
'Jt ~~ ~
CUY Aau--r..- o...<V' , ' 07r-l ~
! /h1~( Jh~~ v / ci~Q~
. 3 <)5-9 - J1-o~ 4u-e.. N uJ IJllnclo ~r'
\\ L~urie & Jim Joslyn
3459 140th Ave. NW
Andover, MN 55304
4:;; --1-1'1;? cf
o
APPROVED FOR
AGENDAlj:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE December 19, 1989
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
C mmi i
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO. 13. Address
Similari ties
BY: James E. Schrantz
In Green Acres plat located west of Crosstown over by Coon Creek,
(Heather street, 141st Avenue, 141st Lane, 142nd Avenue, 142nd
Lane) there are home numbers on 141st Avenue and 141st Lane that
are the same, such as 2938 141st Avenue and 2938 141st Lane.
Dennis Walch lives at 2938 141st Avenue and works out of his
house so he receives a lot of mail. Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Knuckey
live at 2938 141st Lane and often get Dennis Walch's mail.
Mr. Walch has talked to the post office and it was suggested that
one of the addresses be changed. Mr. Walch has offered to pay up
to $30.00 toward the cost of changing the Knuckey's address.
As Mr. Walch receives much business mail I propose that we change
the Knuckey's address to 2944 141st Lane and have Mr. Walch pay
the Knuckeys up to $30 for the inconvenience of the change.
I request that the City Council concur as Mr. & Mrs. Thomas
Knuckey are opposed to the change.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE ni''Ol~1IIlb9r 19, 1909
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
BY: Jay Blake(/City Planner
ITEM Equestrian Council
NO. Appointments
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to appoint the following
individuals to the Andover Equestrian Council.
Carol Almeida
Sharon Orstad
John William Bills
Debi Menth
Ernest Trettel
BACKGROUND
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed several
sections of the Horse Ordinance and found that portions of the
ordinance need updating.
The initial Commission recommendation is that the City Council re-
appoint a Horseman's Council (Equestrian Council) to assist in the
review of the Ordinance update.
Becky Pease will be at the meeting to answer any additional
questions.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION
Name: (]~ ~
Address: dyer (~) ~ IVcJ-/l-rc~
Home phone: lf1r~S-303 Work Phone: t.fJLf- J;Z3~
Commission Preference:
Planning & Zoning
Park & Recreation
Economic Development
Charter Commission
Fire Dept. Advisory Commission Cable Comm.
Equestrian council~
Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory
commission checked above:
J -f e~ ~vL()-U-0L k1 /J A.J!.J /jA Q~ cL ' /,~
;a,;l !'~ J;d-j, CL ~lJf~
'--' ~ C>/-- ~'U:~ dL ~ ~~
Describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve
on this commission:
~~,
Describe y ur professional, C1V1C or c mmunity activities which
may be relevant to ~his commission: ~' >
J ~/V1,1 , 1~L,I../J >>1~'la.r k.. 0-- /~ft~..Alf
" V~ !
~~ ~11J!:::~'
0::' ~-"-_~ J2~~ . . - w~'J,
Slgnature .
J~~~,~Jl-k&.~~~~
~ ,S- C~ ~~, ~-: ~"J) JJ.
?jP~J-..A-~ o-;L~~ ~r-~)
~ ;;';Ck ~-" 0 tAl -I~~ Llh--~ 6-~
-, ,~.A j} )', ./Ck ~~;::l- O-A-Q~ .
~Vl---'" ~cJt.-.~ U
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION
Name:
~H;fe On,) DR 5 rP{t]
/ bo3 L/ CJe.05S7ZJWzJ
'i-3L../- bdJjWork Phone:
6 fvc{J.
454-- b.;l./ 7
Address:
Home Phone:
Commission Preference:
Planning & Zoning
Economic Development
Park & Recreation
Charter Commission
Fire Dept. Advisory Commission Cable Comm.
Equestrian council~
Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory
commission checked above:
.A . ~ ,~ ) ~
'--11., CLv...t ~ u~ ~ ~L(!/..J ~'--L-<- 9 ~~ ;
~,~~' ~ c:v HORsE flvW82S CL.-V-ce..-,
Describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve
on this commission:
~~,~~~j~
----r-n.a-.,.,...-. <~ ~ -.,- ...zl.~
(j
Describe your professional, civic or community activities which
may be relevant to this commission:
Lu4L ~ cQO?~. .~~ ~ ~.~)
.x.'L.~c. ,.~ '7 '-1-ntL.--<- Q ::;~c;) ~,
dJ O)~/I U
Dated: I&'/I/&~ ~~(!)~ --------~-
Signature
,/'
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION
Name: Toh(\ 1-t)fYI. R,l\s
Add re s s: ! Ll '3> toll ?\o.\ \' \ e ~c.\ N l-v
Home Phone: 43.4 - :) :3 \;;Z
Work phone: 5?.;J- '710'71
Commission Preference:
Planning & Zoning
Park & Recreation
Economic Development
Charter Commission
.
Fire Dept. Advisory Commission
Equestrian Council~
please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory
Cable Comm.
commission checked above:
J) ~ 0. l''-~~ c-n,,-~ "i i:l ^..;.V\.fb\ o ",A d.'-t.".J1.A .9;..a~ :t, -:J:::".fu Q.'l'\ ~
u
F h.. R~~"'1"" ~'^U ^~.l'-'-- <t t4'-' l-~ n.-.vl~~1,:/'tJ. :~ .L~o.ll>
""""~~<.-t .
Describe 1o~r education/experience which qualifies you to serve
on this commission:
0l\'lf\O..~ Q4..,lAl^,~~" ~U ~~ 7 .J ~
~~tr:;~~~=-t~~ 4r) ~ ~.~~
Dated, \'d.'lii'R ~ \>J...~L
Sign ture
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION
Name:
Debi A. Menth
Address: 1416 Andover Blvd N.W., Andover, Mn 55304
Home Phone: 434-8898
work Phone: 786-0971
Commission Preference:
Planning & zoning
Park & Recreation
Economic Development
Charter Commission
Fire Dept. Advisory Commission
Cable Comm.
Equestrian Council x
Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory
commission checked above:
I am very interested in being involved in the humane treatment
of animals. I could be very helpful to new or current residents of
andover ~n sett~ng up and ma~nta~n~ng a smail horse operation.
Describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve
on this commission:
I have also worked part time for large training facilitys.
besides running a carpeting company.
Describe your professional, civic or community activities which
may be relevant to this commission:
I have bred, raised, trained, shown, and boarded horses since
I was a child.And currently.
Dated: Dec.4th 1989
f!2c/- y /J&~'
Signature
o
.
CITY of ANDOVER
ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION
Name: #/IJ~ST UJ /,Rc:IT~!-.
Address: jlNd- A;JOOtICA gj.,tlO A/OJ ~
.
Home phone: if3J-1- J.fSd-.3 WO rk Phone:
AAI/JOVL'lJ.i 111J/
0t11- 7c';;'S'
<5"63(Jlf
Commission Preference:
Planning & zoning
Park & Recreation
Economic Development
Charter Commission
Cable Comm.
Fire Dept. Advisory Commission
Equestrian council~
please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory
commission checked above:
To ftsSlsT AiJDOI/,c12. III.! f/Jfi./TI,vr; ~F TilE ErN /tV:F O!<./J1I'.Ii1l'1c6:/
AtJD 10 As;.SI5T 'T;-/~ CITY IN DviolZ.c/N'G or Till'; ()I20/IVt1NCC.
Describe your education/experience. which qualifies you to serve
on this commission:
~lIIsE If SOIIRJ)
.h, fl. 'I '!it,S .
,
~~G Fol?. q '11<<;. .
RESIOEto/T ot
p" () 111 JJ:J AI,
A,v/)iOa-JI.,
;
FAIl'm;to/(; [3l1-v/(r,/x.ov,./O
Describe your professional, civic or community activities which
may be relevant to this commission:
of AlA. or flivo Jo1J COcJ,viY J{-II
.
AftALooSA J.!.OME cLvl3.
,
/IOILSE ~mhll17c;: (,:) 'ilL>)
1I1;IBIIW ;.IOA-S'" ASS. of Am~j(lcll/.J:NC.
-D-ate-d~()EC- Sf /or~9
I
~w~
Signature
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE no~~mh9r 1~, l~S~
ITEM
NQ 15. Open Burning,
Con in
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY, (}
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
The City Council is requested to consider the open burning request
that is before the Council.
The item started as a request from some property owners in the
City that live on 2-1/2 acre lots wanting to burn and believed if
they would get a permit with their neighbor or neighbors that they
would be allowed to burn.
This item was on the November 21st agenda and continued to the
December 5th agenda. It was tabled at the December 5th meeting.
Enclosed: MPCA Letter, 11/27/89
Bill Hawkin's Letter, 12/1/89
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency r~
520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 .~~
Telephone (612) 296-6300 L/l '"
MINNESOTA 1990
J3a6 ~t:rc. 1'0
::!l>yce- IZ//
C:,C . {Y./~
;:-;'" . E -- ;,;;.--~ -o"J,::" .. ..
~,. ': :- .~ V to i'l
. \:i-t.;, ,t!_~
'/.--. -l4
1 ;'JCV 2 9 1989 ,Ll
'10
November 27,1989
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard
Andover, Minnesota 55304
North West
To Whom It May Concern:
CITY OF ANDOVER
RE: OPEN BURNING
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is in the process
of updating the open burning files. Our records indicate that
Roger Palmer, Fire Chief, and Ritchie Larson, Fire Marshal have
been authorized to issue permits in the City of Andover since
April, 1984.
The MPCA requests the following information: a copy of the
letter stating the delegation of authority including the person's
name, title, mailing address, telephone number and a copy of the
ordinance adopting Minn. Rules parts 7005.0700-.0820 Open Burning
Restrictions and Permitting Requirements.
Please submit this information in writing by December 26, 1989.
If you have any questions, you may contact me at (612) 296-6707.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
a~~~mJ1~
'cqu<eline M. Deneen
-~force~e~t Unit
Regulatory Compliance Section
Divisio~ of Air Quality
JMD/J.mb2....l4
cc: Open Burning File
o
Regional Offices: Dul.uth. Brainerd. Detroit Lakes. Marshall. Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled Paper
JIEC- 1-8':;0 FRI L6:24
o
o
I=- . €12
U.W O~F'IC[S 01'
B1IrKe lilt" Jll1wkiH$
JOHN M. IIURKE
WIl.I.'''M G. HAWKINS
IIUIH:IOI
a~a ClJON ""~I~ 1I0Ul.!V""t.
COON ",,~I08. MINN[GOTA t11'l4~3
"'ONE (8 I Z) 7....2ll011
December 1, 1989
Mr. James E. Schrantz
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosotown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Open Burning
Dear Jim:
'!'he follo;.Ting ,i.s wri.tten in response to questions which have
arisen concerning the authority of the City and other agencies
to regulate open burning., Open burning whereby the resultlng
combustion products are emitted directly into the at.mosphere is
regulated by the. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and
generally prohibHed by State regulations. The State regu]al;.ioJl
which deals with ,this subject is APe 8. APC does 8utho,dze open
burning for ce.t.ta in purposes upon issuance of a permit. 'l'hot;e
purposes are set out in the regulation and I will not recite
them in this letter. The City also may regulate open burning
but the regulations of the City must be consistent Or more
stringent than the State regulation. Most cities have enacted
an open burning ordinance which merely ndopcs APe 8 by
reference. That is what Andover has done under Ordlnance
No. 69.
Under APC a a numbeI: of individuals are authorized to issue
burning permits. The permit issuers include the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency, the Department of Natural Resources
Forest Officer for locations within his juriSdiction, a local
Department of Natural Resources Firo Warden for locations within
his jurisdiction and the City Fire Chief or other person
designated by the City for locations within the city.
In addition to APC 8, Minnesota Statute SS. 17 requires t:hat
permission to set fire to any grass, stubble, peat, brush;
rubbish, garbage branches, slashing or other woods for the
purpose of cleanup, Clearing and improving land shall be issued
l.t E C:-
o
o
t -::""39
.. .'~. Ir:::-
.. ...,:. ---'
Fo. .'" 3
F F: I
1. E",
Mr. James E. Schrantz
December 1, 1989
Page 2
by the regular forest officer. In some instances where this
request is made in Andover, the permit is issued by the DNR and
not the City. It is my understo'l.nding however that the DNR does
inform the City when it issues a permit under the aut.hority
granted under MS ea.17.
In summary, the vast majority of permits for open burning In th/~
City are issued by the City officials. There are only isolated
instances where permits would be issued by other agencies,
however, authority tor such issuance is granted under APe 8. If
you have any further questions, please ieel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
William G. Hawkins
WGH;mk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
December 19, 1989
DATE
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff and Committees
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard Koolick \\Z-
Finance Director
BY:
ITEM 16. Utility Bill/Due
NO. Date Discussion
RE UE T
The Andover City Council is requested to review the timing of
payments for City water, sewer and street lighting bills.
BACKGROUND
This request stems from a number of residents inquiring if the due
date of city utility bills could be changed. Currently, bills are
mailed quarterly around the fifteenth of the month following the
end of the quarter (January, April, July, October). They are
currently due by the end of the month. This gives residents
between 14 and 16 days to pay depending whether the month has
30 or 31 days and if the fifteenth falls on a weekend or not.
Failure to pay by this due date results in a 10 percent penalty
being added to the balance.
The residents that have discussed this with me feel that receiving
a quarterly bill that can run as high as $150 to $200 and having
only two weeks to pay is unfair. They find it difficult to budget
for this bill since the amounts vary widely between quarters (due
to weather) and since a large number of them are new houses, there
is little history available for them to anticpate the amount.
I reviewed Ordinances #32 (Sanitary Sewer) and #55 (Municipal
Water System) and found no mention of the due date being set by
ordinance. I proceeded to review the appropriate resolutions and
again, found no mention of establishing a due date. Further
discussions with the City Clerk and City Treasurer disclosed that
several years ago, the payments were due on the 25th of the month.
The bills were dated the first of the month, but may have been
mailed later than this date.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
City Council Meeting
December 19, 1989
utility Bill Payment Date
o
FINANCE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION
Based on the research performed and discussion with residents and
staff, it is my recommendation that the due date be changed to
three full weeks from the date mailed. The advantages of this
date are as follows:
1. It gives most residents the option of paying after the first
of the month when funds are usually more plentiful, for those
persons paid semi-monthly.
2. It allows City staff additional days to input payments thereby
smoothing out the workload of the utility clerk.
3. It allows city staff additional days to deal with those bills
returned by the post office. Currently, bills returned by the
post office, for what ever reason, are remailed so close to
the due date that it is almost impossible for them to avoid
the late penalty.
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Change due date of utility bills to the recommended three
weeks after billing or some other timing as City Council sees
appropriate.
2. Do not change due date and continue to have utility bills due
by the end of the month.
3. Continue this item for further discussion.
4. Request additional information prior to making a decision.
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE no,..~mh~p" 1 p. 1PSP
ITEM
NO.
Compensation ACPTF
17.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planningr
BY: Jay Blake~City
Planner
APPROVe,: FOR
AGE~ \
-~
BY: .J
V
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to discuss the
compensation for members of the Andover Comprehensive Plan Task
Force.
BACKGROUND
Currently the nine member ACPTF has been meeting for the last
two months, beginning the process of updating the Comprehensive
Plan. The City has not established a budget for compensating the
members of the Committee.
Both the Park and Recreation Board and the Planning and Zoning
Commission have annual budgets for compensation. Yet, several
other committees do not have a budget in place to pay for
committee salaries. The major difference is that both the Park
and Planning Commissions are established by Ordinance.
OPTIONS
1. The Committee shall establish a budget for compensation and
submit it to the City Council for approval.
2. Members of the Committee (representing Park and Planning
Commissions) should submit time sheets for compensation and
the time should be charged to those individual accounts.
3. Members of the Committee are volunteers and should not be
compensated.
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n~~9m~9r 19, 1909
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM
NO.
Engineering
18.Accept Assessment
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution adopting
the assessment roll for Project 88-8, Old Colony Estates for
improvements of watermain, sanitary sewer, storm drain and street
construction;
and
approve the resolution adopting the assessment roll for Project
88-17, Red Oaks 5th Addition for improvements for watermain,
sanitary sewer, storm drain and street construction.
The developer of each project has asked that the hearing be waived
and has waived his right to appeal the assessment.
The assessments for Red Oaks 5th Addition have all been ~aid.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT NO. 88-8, OLD COLONY ESTATES.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given to the developer,
the developer has waived the assessment hearing and the right to
appeal, the council has not heard any objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.5 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
resolution, and Councilmen
voting in favor of the
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
The Gaughan Companies
Gaughan Land Incorporated, P. J. Gaughan, Inc., Gaughan Management, Inc., Gaughan Realty
Northtown Business Center
299 Coon Rapids Blvd., Suite 210, Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55433
November 30, 1989
Mr. James Schrantz
City of Andover
Andover City Hall
1685 NW Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
Gaughan Land, Incorporated, owner of the Old Colony Estates
subdivision, waives the right to a public hearing on the
proposed special assessments on project 88-8 and waives the
right to appeal said assessments provided said assessment for
project 88-8 assessed to Old Colony Estates does not exceed
$480,007.55.
Sincerely,
~:~ COMPANIES
~~'. Hamel
President
AH/mbu
- Land Development, Construction, Property Management -
Equal Opportunity Employer
(612) 786-6320
FAX # 786-9320
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREET CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT NO. 88-17, RED OAKS MANOR 5TH ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given to the developer,
the developer has waived the assessment hearing and the right to
appeal, the council has not heard any objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.76 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
Meeting this
, 19 , with Councilmen
day of
resolution, and Councilmen
voting in favor of the
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
ATTEST: .
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
December 4, 1989
Mr. James Schrantz
City of Andover
Andover City Hall
1685 NW Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz
The owner/developer of Red Oaks 5th Addition hereby waives the
right to a public hearing on the proposed special assessments on
project 88-17 and waives the right to appeal said assessments
provided said assessments do not exceed $297,409.00
Sincerely,
~7~ r'Z);?JL-
/' Norm ~Im
Owner/Developer
APPROVED FOR
::ENc~
o
DATE D9QQmSar 19, 1989
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
1\Tnn_n;
'~L
Engineering
ITEM
NO. 19.Declare Costs,
89-4. 88-20
BY: 'T~_~~ '" "~l.v~~"_
v
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
the cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for Project
88-20, Bent Creek Estates;
and
Project 89-4, Red Oaks Manor 6th Addition.
Attached for information is the breakdowq of the cost.
For both of the projects the final costs are less than the
feasibility costs.
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
o
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR, THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN
AND STREET CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 88-20, BENT CREEK ESTATES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$62,793.35, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $19,480.00 and work previously done
amount to $16,831.02 so that the total cost of the improvement will be
$99,104.37.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to
be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be
$99,104.27.
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 7.76 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
BENT CREEK ESTATES
PROJECTS 88-20
COMMISSION NO. 9281
Feasibility Final %
Report Cost ChanQe
PER LOT ASSESSMENT
Lateral Assessments
Sanitary Sewer $4,134.00 $3,281.90
Watermain 3,280.00 2,369.94
Storm Sewer 414.00 553.22
Street and Restoration 3.154.00 2.673.09
Subtotal $10,982.00 $8,878.15 (-23.7%)
Trunk AsseSsments
Sanitary Sewer: Connection $185.00 $193.81 (average)
Sanitary Sewer: Area 320.00 307.81 (average)
Watermain: Connection 849.00 900.00 (average)
Watermain: Area 394.00 375.15
Subtotal $1,748.00 $1,776.77 (+1.7%)
TOTAL ASSESSMENT PER LOT $12,730.00 $10,654.92 (-19.5%)
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Construction Cost $77,100.00 $62,793.35
Expenses 23,130.00 19,480.00
Trunk Source and StoraQe 18.489.75 16.831.02
Total Cost oflmprovement $118,719.75 $99,104.27 (-19.8%)
(Thomas McCabe - deferred) 17.256.00 15.124.95
Total Assessment to Bent Creek Estates $101,463.75 $83,979.32 (-20.8%)
0 ASSESSMENT ROLLS
10 Year@ 7.76%
Equal Payment
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
o
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN
AND STREET CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 89-4, RED OAKS MANOR 6TH
ADDITION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$115,649.06, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $30,341.00 and work previously done
amount to $35,133.50 so that the total cost of the improvement will be
$181,123.56.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $181,123.56.
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 7.76 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
RED OAKS MANOR 6TH ADDITION
PROJECTS 89-4
COMMISSION NO. 9432
Feasibility Final %
Report Cost ChanQe
PER LOT ASSESSMENT
Lateral Assessments
Sanitary Sewer $1,696.00 $1,348.82
Watermain 1,692.00 1,484.10
Storm Sewer 798.00 676.02
Street and Restoration 2 432.00 1.525.20
Subtotal $6,618.00 $5,034.14 (-31.5%)
Trunk Assessments
Sanitary Sewer: Connection $222.00 $221.50
Watermain: Connection $990.00 $990.00
Subtotal $1,212.00 $1,211.50 (same)
TOTAL ASSESSMENT PER LOT $7,830.00 $6,245.75 (-25.4%)
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Construction Cost $147,630.00 $115,649.06
Expenses 44,290.00 30,341.00
Trunk Source and Storaoe 35.148.00 35.133.50
Total Cost of Improvement $227,068.00 $181,123.56 (-25.4%)
ASSESSMENT ROLLS
----"------
10 Year@ 7.76%
Equal Payment
0
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE nO~9mQQr 19, 19O9
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
FOR
Engineering
ITEM
NO. 20. Accept Easements/
BY:
BY:
The City Council is requested to accept the easements for Uplander
Street.
When the Council accepts the easements the City Attorney then
files the easement at the courthouse.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
Form No. 28.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED
Individual (5) to Corporation
or Partnership
Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (1978)
Miller-Davis Co.. Minneapolis
o
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19_
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ EXEMPT
Date: . 19_
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Nayne To. Brichacek.
Frp-p-man. single
sincrle and Susan M.
. Grantor (s),
(marital status)
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to the Ci ty of Andover
a mllnicipril
real property in
corporririnn
Anokri
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
, Grantee,
See reverse side for complete legal.
(if more space is needed, continue on backl
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
~-T'-<. 'd, E.2.,:'L4'/!b
Way e L. Br~chacek
Affix De."d Tax Starn p Here
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF II A/d m
Susan M. Freeman
?
~'-"-<.-/ 7n- ~~,
} ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
by Wayne L. Brichacek, single and Susan M.
27'1tj day of 10 v07?7..F82
Freeman, slngle
.l~,
J1C^^,,^Vl/Vv\AV..~.V\AN'o/'v\.
~,~$~.'~h JAMES E. SCHRANTZ I
Ir~J.t~:1 NOTARv PUBLIC - MINNEf,OTA
'<11>11." ANOKA COUNTY
MyCommission Expires JULY 91991
llV'wwwvvwwvwvwvwvvvvvvvvvvvv.
Wayne L. Brichacek and
Susan 11. Freeman
15944 Uplander Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
THIs.INSTiuM'ENT'WAS-DRAFTED-BY-(NAM-EAND-A~DDRESS): i
i
,
I
I
Burke and Hawkins
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
o
,-------~_..._--,..- -'"'"'--.-'--"'---
I
I
_,J
A perpetual easement 10 feet in width for drainage and utility
purposes over, under and across the following described
property:
That part of the Southerly 150 feet of the Northerly 1010
feet of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, in
Anoka County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the easterly
322.99 feet thereof (all distances are as measured parallel
with the easterly and northerly lines of said West Half);
except road.
o
The centerline of said perpetual easement being described as
follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said West Half; thence
West a distance of 322.99 feet; thence South a distance of
937 feet; thence West a distance of 33 feet to the point of
beginning, thence deflecting left 26 degr!!es 00 minutes a
distance of 110 feet and there terminating.
NOTIC E
Anok a,
19
IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Andover, County
State of Minnesota, has accepted on
, the above described easement in this document.
of
Da ted:
, 19_
CITY OF ANDOVER
(SEAL)
By
Clerk
THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE ANOKA
COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER PURSUANT
TO MINN. STAT. SECTION 386.77.
The Ci ty of Andove r by accepting this easement ag rees to take
responsibility for any damage done to the water well owned by
the grantors located adjacent to the storm sewer easement
granted herein if such damage is caused as a result of the use
or maintenance of the storm sewer system by the City. If such
storm sewer malfunctions the City of Andover agrees to repair
such storm sewer system and any subsequent damage resulting
therefrom.
o
I-:C
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE nQ~9mb9r 19, 1909
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
FOR
Engineering
/'
ITEM
NO.
21.Approve St. Const.
Lund's 4th Addn
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the improvement of
topsoil, seeding and street construction within the street right-
of-way for Lund's Evergreen Estates 4th Addition.
The City staff has been to the site to inspect the street
construction of the developer.
At the time of this writing Mr. Lund has not submitted an as-built
grading plan for the lots for the development. Staff is working
with the City Attorney to obtain the plans from Mr. Lund.
It is recommended to approve the street construction.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL GRADING FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION
OF LUND'S EVERGREEN ESTATES 4TH ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY
JAMES LUND IN SECTION 9-32-24.
WHEREAS, the developer has completed grading, seeding, and
street construction within the street right-of-way for Lund's
Evergreen Estates 4th Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the final grading for street
construction of Lund's Evergreen Estates 4th Addition.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE December 19, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO. 22. Approve Engineerin
Rates Bonestroo BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the proposed engineering
rates for Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates for the year
1990.
Attached is a letter from BRA explaing the increase.
The rates are reasonable.
I recommend approval.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
j f1 j Bones t roo
~ Rosene
o Anderlik &
. ~ . Associates
Engineers & Architects
Otto G. Bonestroo, PE.
Robert W. Rosene. P.E.
Joseph C. AnderJik, PE.
Richard E. Turner, P.E.
James C. Olson, P.E.
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
Thomas E. Noyes. P.E.
Robert G. Schunichr. P.E.
Marvin L Sorvala. P.E.
Kei!h A. Gordon. P.E.
Richard \XI. Foster. P.E.
Donald C. Burgardt. P.E.
Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E.
Mark A. Hanson, PE.
Ted K. Field. P.E.
Michael T. Rautmann. P.E.
Robert R. pfefferle. P.E.
David 0. loskora. P.E.
Thomas W. Peterson, P.E.
Michael C. lynch. P,E.
James R. Maland. P.E.
Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E.
Mark R. Rolfs. P.E.
Robert C. Russek, A.LA.
Thomas E. Angus. P.E.
Howard A. Sanford. P.E.
Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E.
Mark A. Seip, P.E.
Philip J. Caswell. PE.
Mark D. WalJis. PE.
Thomas R. Anderson. A.I.A.
Gary F. Rylander. PE.
Miles B. Jensen, PE.
l. Phillip Gravel III. P.E.
Charles A. Erickson
Leo M. Pawelsky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Eberlin. c.P.A.
,ij~":' E i: "~' :, ~!I,' iioo'U"':
W. \Jb~WL,
~ G;;;-~~i.
CITY OF ANDOVER
December 1, 1989
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Anoka, MN 55303
Attn: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Re: 1990 Rate Schedule
Andover, Minnesota
File No. 171 General
Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Recently we submitted for approval the proposed 1989 hourly rates for
engineering services. It was pointed out by the Council that State levy
increases for The City are being limited to 3% this year whereas our rates
were being increased to an average just under 5% over the rates charged in
1989.
It should be pointed out that our increase in rates is not due entirely to a
5% increase in our personnel wages but primarily due to the large increases in
overhead which have been experienced during the past few years. Our
professional liability insurance has increased 100%, our commercial insurance
is up 33% and the payroll taxes paid by the company are up well over 5%.
Other overhead costs such as health insurance, equipment maintenance and
property taxes are much higher than in the past and require an increase in our
hourly rates.
The majority of
which do not
increase would
projects we work on in the City are Municipal State Aid or 429
affect the City's general budget. Based on 1989 billings the 5%
add less than $35.00 to the city's general budget.
We feel that our proposed rate structure for
considering these increased costs and in comparison
comparable services by other professional firms.
1990
with
is still very
rates charged
fair
for
We respectfully request that our 1990 hourly rate structure be approved as
submitted.
ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
,.-
o
Ll/76
2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 · 612-636-4600
o
n
-.
1\]1
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E.
Robert W. Rosene. P.E.
Joseph C. Anderlik. PE.
Bradford A. Lemberg. PE.
Richard E. Turner, P:E.
James C. Olson, PE.
Glenn R. Cook. P.E.
Thomas E. Noyes. P.E.
Robert G. Schunichr. P.E.
MaN;n L. Sorvala, P.E.
Keith A. Gordon, P.E.
Richard W. Foster, P.E.
Donald C. Burgardt. P.E.
Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E.
Mark A. Hanson, PE.
Ted K. Field, P.E.
Michael r. Rautmann. P.E.
Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E.
David 0. Loskota. P.E.
Thomas W. Peterson, P.E.
Michael C. lynch. P.E.
James R. Maland, P.E.
Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E.
Keith A. Bachmann, P.E.
Mark R. Rolfs, P.E.
Robert C. Russek. A.IA
Thomas E. Angus. P.E.
Howard A. Sanford. P.E.
Daniel J. Edgerton. P:E.
Mark A. Seip. P.E.
Philip J. Caswell, P,E.
Mark D. Wallis. P.E.
. Thomas R. Anderson, A.I.A.
Gary F. Rylander. P.E.
Charles A. Erickson
Leo M. PaweJSky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Eberlin, CPA.
Engineers & Architects
R~il-
CITY OF ANDOVER
October 26, 1989
Honorable Mayor and City
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Anoka, MN 55303
Council
Attn: Mr. James Schrantz
Re: 1990 Rate
Honorable Mayor and Council:
Transmitted herewith are revised hourly Engineering Rates which are to be
effective January I, 1990. We have limited the increase in our rates to less
than 5.0 percent.
We have appreciated our relationship with the City of Andover and we are all
looking forward to serving you in 1990. If you have further questions on the
enclosed rate schedule, please call.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~
Otto G. Bonestroo
OGB:mb
Encl.
o
2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 · 612-636-4600
o
o
1990
SCHEDULE B
CLASSIFICATION
HOURLY RATE
Principal Engineer
$57.75
Registered Engineer/Architect
$52.50
$42.50
$39.00
Graduate Engineer/Architect/Field Supervisor
Senior Draftsperson
Senior Technician
$35.50
Technician
$26.25
Word Processor
$26.50
$19.25
Clerical
The above rates will be multiplied by 1.3 for review of private developers
plans and inspection of priyate work to cover professional liability insurance
costs and legal expense.
Reimbursable Expenses - At Cost
Reproduction, Printing, Duplicating
Out-of-Pocket Expenses such as stakes,
field supplies, telephone calls, etc.
Mileage
Andover
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE December 19, 1989
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
APPR, ",~~E"D "OR
AGEN.,,
BY:iY'
f
ITEM
NO.
BY: V. Vo1k \~)JJ
Proc1amationjChemical-
23 . Free Week
The city Council is requested to approve the attached
Proclamation designating the week of January 8-12, 1990 as
"Andover Fight Back Against Drugs Week".
v:Attach.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Jlnoka-!JCermepin
!Independent
School g)ist'Lict Jlo. 11
SCHOOL BOARD
Larry Ragland, Chairman
Susan Anderson, Vice Chairman
Jon Stonecash, Clerk
Denis Kelly, Treasurer
Michael Sullivan, Director
John Peterson, Director
Dr. Lewis Finch, Superintendent
EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER
11299 Hanson Boulevard N.W. . Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55433
612/422-5500
November 30, 1989
~ CC,
(0 - ,
/2)J1/g'Q
The Honorable JIm Elling
Mayor of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Anoka, M N 55303
Dear Mayor Elling:
The week of January 8-12, 1990, has been designated "Chemical-Free
Week" in the Anoka-Hennepin Schools. Activities emphasizing our ongoing
commitment to a drug/alcohol-free society are planned in every school
building.
We invite the city of Andover to join with the District and area businesses
to focus attention on this very important issue. For your reference, I have
enclosed a copy of a proclamation adopted by the Coon Rapids City Council
and materials outlining activities to be conducted in the School District. If
you need additional information or have some suggestions for us, please
contact Judy Sutter, Student Services Coordinator (422-5386).
Sincerely,
~~~
LewisrW: Finch
Superintendent
LWF/NBI-KLZ
Enclosure
o
"Every Student Will Learn"
o
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
PROCLAMATION'
the presence of drugs and narcotics in our society has
resulted in innumerable problems of human, community,
social and economic dimensions; and
the consequences of drug and alcohol-related problems
are witnessed in the loss of human lives, the loss of
economic productivity, the diversion of public resources
to address these problems on all fronts and are threats
to the health of our people; and
the dissolution of the family, an inadequate education
system, poverty, unemployment and greed all contribute
to illegal drug use; and
illegal drugs constitute a problem in our community and
lead to a host of problems such as homicides, robberies,
burglaries and other crimes, and domestic violence; and
hundreds of America's dedicated public servants have
died and thousands of others risk their lives daily to
fight our cities' individual battles against illegal
drugs and the criminal activities stemming from illegal
drugs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Andover declares
January 8-12, 1990 as QANDOVER FIGHT BACK AGAINST DRUGS
WEEK Q .
Proclaimed this 19th day of December 1989.
Attest:
CITY OF ANDOVER
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n9~9mbar 19, 1909
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
J('5~
ITEM
NQ 24. Accept County
Ro d
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the following
resolutions: 1. accepting Nightingale Street between County state
Aid Highway No. 20 and County Road No. 18 from County to City,
2. accepting Crosstown Drive between County Road 116 and 139th
Avenue NW from County to City, and 3. revoking newly constructed
Crosstown Boulevard between County Road 116 and 139th Avenue NW
from City to County.
The County of Anoka Highway Committee has recommended approval
which will be forwarded to the County Board on December 19, 1989
for formal action.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNTY OF ANOKA
Department of Highways
Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer
1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520
December 11, 1989
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN. 55304
Attention:
Todd Haus
Revocation of parts of Nightingale Street (CR 109)
and Crosstown Boulevard (CR 18) and Resolution
Accepting Verdin Street
Regarding:
Dear Todd:
Please find enclosed draft Resolutions for the above referenced items. These
Resolutions were approved at the Anoka County Highway Committee this morning
and will be forwarded to the Board on December 19, 1989, for formal action. Final
copies of the Resolution from the Boards will be made available to you after
minutes are received from the meeting of December 19, 1989.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sihcer ly,
I
Jon G. Olson, P_E
Assistant County Engineer - Construction
L.
dmhj ANDOVER
o
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING NIGHTINGALE STREET NW BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD
18 AND COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 20 IN SECTIONS 15 AND 22,
TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24.
WHEREAS, the agreement indicates the City of Andover will
take over as a local roadway, that portion of Nightingale Streeet
NW, previously known as County Road Number 109, between County
Road Number 18 and County State Aid Highway Number 20.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the
roadway known as Nightingale Street NW, formerly known as County
Road Number 109, between County Road Number 18 and County State
Aid Highway Number 20, be in ownership of the City of Andover.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Andover accepts the
right-of-way and responsibility of maintenance and repair of said
Nightingale Street NW from the County of Anoka.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CROSSTOWN DRIVE BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD 116
AND 139TH AVENUE NW IN SECTION 33-32-24.
WHEREAS, the agreement indicates the City of Andover will
take over as a local roadway, that portion of Crosstown Drive,
previously known as County Road 18, between County Road 116 and
139th Avenue NW.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the
roadway known as Crosstown Drive, formerly known as County Road
18, between County Road 116 and 139th Avenue NW be in ownership
of the City of Andover.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Andover accepts the
right-of-way and responsibility of maintenance and repair of said
Crosstown Drive from the County of Anoka.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
o
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION REVOKING CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD 116
AND 139TH AVENUE NW IN SECTION 33-32-24.
WHEREAS, the agreement indicates the County of Anoka will
take over County Road 18 between County Road 116 and 139th Avenue
NW.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the
roadway known as Crosstown Boulevard between County Road 116 and
139th Avenue NW be in ownership of the County of Anoka.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County of Anoka accepts the
right-of-way and responsibility of maintenance and repair of said
Crosstown Boulevard from the City of Andover.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE December 19. 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Ite
Engineering
ITEM
NO. 25. Final payment/
87-10
BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
the work and directing final payment to Orr Construction Co. for
Project 87-10, Pumphouse #3.
The work has been completed.
Attached is TKDA's recommendation letter.
The final payment amount is $10,521.55.
Contract amount $145,391.00.
Final contract $149,004.00.
MOTION BY
, TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
T
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO ORR
CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR PROJECT NO. 87-10 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
PUMPHOUSE 3.
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of
Andover on April 19, 1988, Orr Construction Co. of Eden Prairie, MN
has satisfactorily completed the construction in accordance with
such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover,
Minnesota. The work completed under said contract is hereby
accepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City
directed to issue a proper order for the
contract, taking the contractor's receipt
MOTION seconded by Councilman
Clerk and Mayor are hereby
final payment on such
in full.
and adopted by the
day
City Council at a
Meeting this
of
, 19
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk -City Clerk
OTKDA
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
December 12,1989
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK aUILOINO
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
6121292-4400
FAX 612/292-0083
Mr. James Scmantz
City Engineer
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, Minnesota 55304
~~~~~i19~ tV
CITY OF ANDOVER
Re: Well Pumphouse No.3
Project 87-10
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 8929-011
Dear Mr. Scmantz:
To the best of our knowledge, based on periodic visits to the site, the referenced project has been
constructed in accordance with the contract documents. We therefore reconullencl fInal payment
to the contractor.
Sincerely,
OJ;(!~
David L. Moore, P.E.
DLMfmha
cc: John Davidson
o