HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC December 5, 1989
DATE: December 5, 1989
~
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Memo to City Council from Jim Scrantz (12/1/89)
Regular City Council Minutes (11/21/89)
Animal Control & Management for bid price (12/5/89)
Planning and zoning Minutes (11/14/89)
"What's Happening"
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
o
'0
o
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Ci ty Council
(Ilk
\! )
'--'
!
~~m~~ F. ~~br~nr~
I
December 1, 1969 .
Address Similariti~~/creen
Acres Addi tiOI.
In Green Acres plat located west of Crosstown over by Coon Creek,
(Heather street, 141st Avenue, 141st Lane, 142nd Avenue, 142nd
Lane) there are home numbers on 141st Avenue and 141st Lane that
are the same, such as 2938 141st Avenue and 2938 141st Lane.
Dennis Walch lives at 2938 141st Avenue and works out of his
house so he receives a lot of mail. Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Knuckey
live at 2938 141st Lane and often get Dennis walch's mail.
Mr. Walch has talked to the post office and it was suggested that
one of the addresses be changed. Mr. Walch has offered to pay up
to $30.00 toward the cost of changing the Knuckey's address.
As Mr. Walch receives much business mail I propose that we change
the Knuckey's address to 2944 141st Lane and have Mr. Walch pay
the Knuckeys up to $30 for the inconvenience of the change.
I request that the City Council concur as Mr. & Mrs. Thomas
Knuckey are opposed to the change.
o
o
It) c.. ~
12/i/f9'
Animal Control & Manaoement
P.O. nox 262118
Shoroview. MN 55126
(612) 426-4013
City Of Andove't"
"
--1990 Animal Control sennce contract Bic! price for se't"Vtce
1989 Monthly Contract amount
_~!?~:.99
1990 MOnthly Contract an~unt
$745.00
---------
Increase -~g.:.~-- Per month
IVe a't"e ve't"y inte't"ested in continuing ou't" se't"Vtce to you't"
ccmmu:nit];h if you have any questions o't" conce't'71S ptease
feel free to contact me at 426-4013.
on H. Anc1e't"son,
Ope't"ations IlAanager
?f'
Quality Care and Animal Control
'.
o
o
****************************************************************
:.************************************************************~*
.. **
. **
.. ~ **
.. **
.. J **
~~__WH7AT'S__,__HAPPENING 1_ ..' ii
~. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
:: December 5, 1989 ::
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. - Anoka Electric Cooperative has purchased the **
:: Minneapolis Gun Club property on Bunker ::
.. Lake Boulevard. They have indicated to us **
:: that they want to move their warehouse and ::
:: office complex to this location over the next ::
.. five years. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
~ ~
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
.. **
..**************************************************************
................................................................
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting-December 5, 1989
7:30 P.M. Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Wagner Development Proposal
2. 173rd/Navajo; 175th Ave.; Navajo Discussion
3. Approve Resolution/Bond Call
4. EIS Review/Proposed Site Q
Staff, Committee, Commission
5. Election Equipment Discussion, Cont.
6. MUSA Discussion
7. Speed Study/157th Avenue
8. Open Burning, Cont.
9.
10. 1989 Budget Adjustments
11. Review Rescue Squad Incentive Pay
Non-Discussion Items
12. Lundby Resolution
13. Final Payment/88-35
14. Final Payment/88-17/Red Oaks 5th
15. Declare Costs, 88-8; 88-17
16. Final payment 89-4
17. Approve CCO/88-9/Tulip Street
Approval of Claims
Adjourn
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE np~pmhpr ~ lqRq
ITEM
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin. b~
V. Volk ~.
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Approval of Minutes
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
November 21, 1989
Regular Meeting
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
December 5, 1989
ITEM Wagner Development
NO. proposal
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
H. Koolick, Fin. Direct r
BY: Jay Blake, City PI er
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Items
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the enclosed
information regarding the possible redevelopment of the Grace
Lutheran Church site (13655 NW Round Lake Boulevard). Lowell
Wagner of the Wagner Corporation has approached both the Church
and City Staff to determine if the redevelopment of the site is
economically feasible.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Wagner approached the city staff to determine if the City
would be interested in assisting with the project through the
creation of a new, or expansion of the existing Tax Increment
Financing District 1-2. He is also aware of potential development
restrictions or hurdles for the property including: traffic
control, neighborhood concerns and market potential.
Mr. wagner will attend the meeting to further discuss development
possibilities. Representatives from Grace Lutheran Church will
also be present.
Mr. Wagner, representatives from Grace Lutheran Church, city staff
and consultants held a preliminary meeting to discuss the
financial aspects of the proposal. Mr. Wagner outlined some
details of a retail development on the site. At that time, staff
and consultants agreed to draw up some numbers for the use of TIF
on the project.
The enclosed memo from Casserly Mohlzahn and Associates presents
potential revenue from the project. Please note that there are
some great assumptions in the memo, including a cost for the
purchase of the building. This has not yet been agreed to by both
parties.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
o TO
SECOND BY
o
Page 2
Wagner Development Memo
December 5, 1989
The proposed redevelopment is not a rush project, although the
church is needing direction for their long range planning efforts,
either on their existing property or on a new site in the
community.
COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. The Andover City Council may direct staff and consultants to
continue to work with both the representatives from Grace Lutheran
Church and Wagner Corporation to prepare an amendment to the TIF
plan for District 1-2, to incorporate the redevelopment of the
church site into the existing TIF district.
2. The Andover City Council may continue, or table the discussion
of redevelopment of the property, as the financial numbers for the
project are not favorable at this time allowing time for staff to
investigate alternative financing options for the project.
3. The Andover City Council may choose to not continue the
discussion of the redevelopment of the Church property.
o
.~::,::-:I j
. ,jl~~~;~~;~I~~
". ....-. "-'T!
~~!f;l!,;~~
:) ... ~_. ~'\.' ~ (lTC - ;m...VV'.J' t / ~
!'1 \ f I '-'\.J~.,:.~.~..,..;:,:':~.,.-V;;C .Fl. r~l/ ... 'il i'Ir-;...-tf-~.J
;:',:,".".:,;,1:,:.(':::-.:..::':.. ~~t- ~- .- I~' ~ .:~
;.:''-;\:\::().;:;(~}Y~i:'\.?' ~ ~_ t:,./ .....-1", ~~}-"l:; '''It
: t ':': :,.,":.:<;':0: ';::i:;:-:/?::=i:: . I . \ .1. , . 'I~ ~~ ~ '- ~f'oIo. . ... ~~
':Y(:X\L';>~.~:~({:Y/:::/:; i: : : . ~'" ~~ 0"" , .. ~I' ", . .
';;,:::,:,..",,:'.')'.;.:'Y:::C;-'::, ~ ;. . Qo(~ f-f-.... .. ~ .
:/-'_:~::,~;),::'::::~~:':;:?/:,Ti~L;' : ,: : -\.~. . '. ". .~~, ;'. . .t~; ~
..:/.<'~'..::;'(::.":~~:i/;'~~ihl::'~:/(~' : ~ 'OJ .... 4..(l..,... ~ .. _"'TM "''''V.L ....\
'.: :'." ,'. .:, '..,'......:., . ~ .. ,,;!!-j iiii .... ~
'::1';:'::::::- ::j,;.<r.;'::':'~:I'.. ~:+ ~~~. "';;"y.{ ""'[]~\~'\'
__ ..... .'" . ...... .-.... ...,.... :,' I.. .. r.....~ '-:./ ~i J..l~'" I~
1';'/:\:::;:\: )::::(V/VJ: : ~~~ : rw -l'...,..'"I2j ~.~ --'::l .
I ::.~:,:';:;.::;-:((:';(3,::-,:::/,:,!.I2f" I~.. ~'.l ~., :;;;t.. ~ -I <t ~
_ _ "_U'h .:"',.::.... .; ".,,:;~:, ~~~~ f.LLl/l7 ~. .. ... "......N
~ci- LI: I- 1-1- I- -::;::!""'lIoJ...~ "j.. ... '. '.' .!
~a I- 1-1- - ~ 5 ~ ~ I"$' ~ ... ~. ,
,11 ~ : "_"~~ I- :;- .~ ~~:~...... I f~ t- ~ ~I~. ~
a~'" :: I- ,- "1-+ I~ >
- -11 : ' . . "" ~ . I' .
~ .._::::-,;f..:?. Ii ~ '.,. ; ijl' 71 ~-c. I'
~~ ..- _1-- ...~~~ ~" I ~. sa ""'"';
,-
I , ~ l:! _ \>> f- TT'
1 ~ ~ .~ "~,.." . f- '.J.
I ~ ~ ~ _" %' LL ~ -.
: ~ u '~ ~ ~= ~ .~ ~ ' f--'ll
I ~ \." ~ ~ ~ ~ = '/.; Ii: I f--~ [I
1 "l t ,1B-. . ~ ,.:..; 'T 1 ~ ffil
'~ :"" o'~J)' .. i ~ ~w ,i. ~~ ~. '-~~~~ !~1i-
~ .i-' c ~ .:! Il ~ . . .l}:~ ~ - c~
"i' . . . u - - _ 1If"!l!- ,..; li
"'- ,,: I ,." ." ~ I.-~ . C - 0.::...:; I t.t;;:; .
I ~~..'" '~'.~ \..,' .1*"I~i~IS3.l".l$.N:f-P,..~ 1 1 I /""~ ~ ~ - :~~ ~,.,~- [ .f!d)'!i-i.s--\..,..I--I.,.
_... ~ ~;;.!~II"~"d~hl~~~"'7-...:"'" 1/ .. ~~~ r.; ~ g <It rr,... ~"...
'.... ..~ .l-+.t.~ - - "- , '0--;;;;;' L I- -.. -I-- '..:' ~ "........I';l.. >
". ~..... ~ ~"'.. ~J:1...~"l......... ..... =... = r.:: ~ snssu..... "':X~""L^-
, '. ,.of ~~--- ~. ...=.~...= ~ 'W::' -~ ~ ,i~.
", ',~~;""':,.,..~>r-r', '".:.-- }.:,.I>I." li"~ ~ .,..,. :;:'~-; :r.n. . '" '';'.
~ .~~ tk<;:- :: : : ::' t~ ~..~ ~
'. ~ ~l~ ~~~===~(""'::':"'.:~I:'Il1:~:
I'.I'~ 0'-' "'Ii: _~~<~.~" Cf=.t'~.:. '1...1."",,-, ...... '.~~. ~"
-.... - ~ i;-ar~:': ot:.. . :~. : ~ ......,: I
r.!5r,~ . ',~ . ~., ,
. I ~~" ~ ~ .. ~ ..... .. ~.. ...
II <NOii'Y~f:i--. 'llI!! . II.U - .. .~~. - .
"" J'f .... ", ~I 11
F= I II I -, r7ii
;/ ! - 1 '^ z' I L ~. ~.I ".:i : . ..\. . - .Z' I I r ~~\
I l~ -..!.. r ~H"';~ 1 ~, :} F.::: Ir-:-~V. .' -no ~ I I -
~~ 'M ''<./'.2:.,,::(1 '~CJj r. "N <Q.
i ,N ,: ,:- "l,. ,y' ~- ~9~::: ~ l~n"'I9I"I' ,
'\.", iJ.;; · ':1" .~:,\::, "1""" ,,~: . :: :: I~'~ ~
II ... ~ #>".. ") ,
I r~--<Il Ii : : ;..... .. . "" ~
\ JL. - __ -f _ ..' ' r. -"'/ I ~ ~
\ "-~..J ~..I;t; :,.' -;- :~ l' -~:.;y - - ~ ~ \J)
~ .~'.. a::: I '.' ~ ~
\ :,',' ~ ~ 'S
..I .... ;:;-W" ~ ~ ~"
, -- ' I 0\"" . ~ l....
"'" '- - .- ---' . ~-' ~..y..1-:! ::r-T, 0;;, 't; :'Co ...
..... 1,'( -~-- I ~ ticiY- ;"IHH~I'" ~'" N ~
..- ", r fA "-'i~N~H,W:q::\.\ ~
l
:~;>;.:::?r:..
,:,..: -:....;:,.
", ..~ ..:.....
(~~~;~(~i\
~;~1(.{:.~~
:~:{~i;;/~~
;:.:~:;."::~>'.~.
~..~2~:.~{:::r/
f .{.:.~.~.:~~l:.~.:
.:~~~(;t;;~,~:
o
o
Casserly Molzahn & Associates, Inc.
215 South 11th Street. Suite 200 . Minneapolis . Minnesota 55403
Office (612) 342-2277 . Fax (612) 332-4765
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Mayor & City Council Members
City Manager
City Planner
City Finance Director
Mary E. MOlzahnfllfN t/--'
James R. Casserly j'
Proposed Development of Grace Lutheran Church Site
November 28, 1989
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please find attached an analysis of the proposed shopping center
for the existing Grace Lutheran Church site. This analysis
provides the following information:
Column (1)
Column (2)
Column (3)
Column (4)
o
YEAR~: If the proposed development proceeds, an
economic development tax increment financing
district must be established. The maximum term
for this type of tax increment financing district
is 10 years from date of certification or 8 years
from receipt of the first tax increment, whichever
occurs first.
DATE: The spreadsheet is formatted on a semi
annual basis assuming a calendar year.
ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY: The existing site which
is occupied by the Grace Lutheran Church is
currently designated as tax exempt real property.
As a result of this designation, the original or
current tax capacity is $0. However, when a title
transfer occurs rendering the property taxable,
the property will be assessed by the County
Assessor and assigned a value or tax capacity.
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY: The total area of the
proposed shopping center is estimated at 40,000 to
50,000 square feet. Using an average square
footage of 45,000 and assuming $2.00 per square
foot in taxes, the estimated tax capacity of the
proposed shopping upon completion is $95,531.
Completion is assumed in 1990, with full tax
capacity assessed in 1991 for taxes payable in
1992.
o
o
Column (5)
ESTIMATED TAX INCREMENT: Based on the above
assumptions and the City's current total tax
capacity rate of .942100, annual tax increments
are estimated at $90,000 annually or $45,000 semi
annually. Total tax increment receipts
approximate $720,000.
Column (6)
ADMIN EXPENSES: It is assumed that 5% of the
available tax increment generated will be retained
by the City for administrative expenses incurred
with respect to this tax increment financing
district. Total administrative fees approximate
$36,000.
Column (7)
AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENT: These figures reflect
the difference Columns (5) and (6). These monies
are available semi annually for qualified
development expenses. Total available tax
increments approximate $684,000.
Column (8)
SEMI ANNUAL P.V.; TAX EXEMPT @ 7.5%: This column
represents the semi annual present value of the
available revenue stream in Column (7) based on a
tax exempt rate of 7.5%. The present value of
$684,000 over 10 years is estimated at $437,966.
Column (9)
CUMULATIVE P.V.; TAX EXEMPT @ 7.5%: These amounts
are a cumulative total of Column (8).
Column (10)
SEMI ANNUAL P.V.; TAXABLE @ 10.0%: This column
represents the semi annual present value of the
available revenue stream in Column (7) based on a
taxable rate of 10.0%. The present value of
$684,000 over 10 years is estimated at $381,170.
Column (11)
CUMULATIVE P.V.; TAXABLE @ 10.0%: These amounts
are a cumulative total of Column (10).
,
The qualified development costs identified for this proposal
include:
Acquisition Expenses
Demolition Expenses
Special Assessments Due
Total
$1,700,000
$ 100,000
$ 87,500
$1,887,500
It is apparent that with project expenses of approximately
$1,887,500 and available revenues of between $437,966 and
$381,170, depending on a tax exempt or taxable financing
scenario, that the proposed development of the Grace Lutheran
Church site is not self supporting; shortfalls range between
$1,449,534 and $1,506,330, respectively.
o
o
It appears that if the development were to proceed as currently
proposed, the City may have three options. The City could
compensate for the shortfall from (1) available City funds if
legally allowable; (2) excess tax increment funds provided by the
City's other tax increment financing districts; or, (3) developer
payments.
It should also be noted that the attached analysis is a "best
case scenario". As mentioned above when the property transfers
from a tax exempt to taxable status, the County will reassess the
property. At this time the.new tax capacity, as determined by
the County, is added to the original tax capacity of $0. By
increasing the original tax capacity, the captured tax capacity
is decreased dollar for dollar. It is the captured tax capacity
from which the estimated tax increment is calculated.
For example, under the attached scenario the original tax
capacity of $0 is subtracted from the estimated tax capacity of
$95,531, which leaves a captured tax capacity of $95,531. The
captured tax capacity is multiplied by the tax capacity rate of
.9421 and results in an annual tax increment of $90,000 ($45,000
semi annually). For comparison purposes only, if we assume the
Grace Lutheran Church site, after valuation, has a tax capacity
of $25,000, then this amount is added to the original tax
capacity of $0. The total or $25,000 is then subtracted from the
same estimated tax capacity of $95,531, resulting in a captured
tax capacity of $70,531. After applying the tax capacity rate of
.9421, the resulting annual tax increment is now $66,447 ($33,224
semi annually). Further, the present value calculations would
also be decreased.
In summary, under the best case scenario, shortfalls from the
shopping center development as currently proposed would result in
deficits ranging from $1,449,534 to $1,506,330. These shortfalls
would have to be funded from excess tax increment monies
generated by the City's two existing tax increment financing
districts, from other City funds or from the developer.
28-Nov-89 CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA GRACEl
~'ED DEVELOPMENT OF GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ----~-------------------
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11 )
ORIGINAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED LESS AVAILABLE TAX EXEMPT @ 7.500% TAXABLE @ 10.000%
DATE TAX TAX TAX ADMIN TAX SEMI ANNUAL CUMULATIVE SEMI ANNUAL CUMULATIVE
YEARS MO YEAR CAPACITY CAPACITY INCREMENT EXPENSES INCREMENT P.V. P.V. P.V. P.V.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
0.0 12 / 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.5 6 / 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.0 12 / 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.5 6 / 1991 0 95,531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.0 12 / 1991 0 95,531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.5 6 / 1992 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 35,563 35,563 33,496 33,496
3.0 12 / 1992 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 34,277 69,840 31,901 65,396
3.5 6 / 1993 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 33,038 102,879 30,382 95,778
4.0 12 / 1993 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 31,844 134,723 28,935 124,713
4.5 6 / 1994 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 30,693 165,416 27, 557 152,270
5.0 12 / 1994 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 29,584 195,000 26,245 178,515
5.5 6 / 1995 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 28,515 223,515 24,995 203,510
6.0 12 / 1995 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 27,484 250,998 23,805 227,315
6.5 6 / 1996 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 26,491 277,489 22,671 249,986
7.0 12 / 1996 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 25,533 303,022 21,592 271,578
7.5 6 / 1997 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 24,610 327,632 20,563 292,141
8.0 12 / 1997 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 23,721 351,353 19,584 311,725
8.5 6 / 1998 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 22,863 374,216 18,652 330,377
9.0 12 / 1998 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 22,037 396,253 17,764 348,140
9.5 6 / 1999 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 21,240 417,493 16,918 365,058
10.0 12 / 1999 0 95,531 45,000 2,250 42,750 20,473 437,966 16,112 381,170
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
720,000 36,000 684,000 437,966 437,966 381,170 381,170
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
PAY 1990 PAY 1985
------------------------
TOTAL ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY 0 0
PIN # 32-32-24-42-0007 0 0
PIN # 32-32-24-42-0009 0 0
ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.000
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY 95,531
SQUARE FEET 45,000
TAXES/SQUARE FOOT 2.00
COMPLETI ON 1990
INFLATION 0.000%
TAX CAPACITY RATE 0.942100
ADMIN EXPENSES 5.000%
PRESENT VALUE FACTOR
TAX EXEMPT 7.500%
0 TAXABLE 10.000%
ACQUISITION COSTS
DEMOLITION
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
1,700,000
100,000
87,500
TOTAL COSTS
1,887,500
CASSERLY MOLZAHN & ASSOCIATES
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n9~91RS9r B, 1989
ITEM
NO.
2.
175th
BY:
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to order, reject or reconsider the
three segments of Project 88-16; l73rd/Navajo street, l75th Avenue
and Navajo street.
For the l75th Avenue part of the proposed improvement we don't
have a petition. Navajo street, the northern part, there is a
petition that is adequate; l73rd and Navajo, there is a petition
signed by the people on Navajo street only.
None of the property owners on l73rd that abutted the construction
phase of the project have signed the petition; two of the property
owners are on the Council and the other is Frank Padula. Frank
has indicated that he would be in favor of the project if he would
pay the same number of units as the other property owners on the
other side of the road. padula is also concerned about losing
some trees because the road alignment has moved way to the north
over the years. So to build the road where it belongs along the
section line where we have the right-of-way causes a number of
trees to be removed on Padula's property on the south side.
As you remember, a couple of the lots went forfeit during this
process.
When the Council was going to award the bid a couple of the
property owners on Navajo Street South indicated that the price
had gone too high. Still, there is a core of at least eight
people who indicate they still want the improvements at the $2450
price.
The improvements for l73rd and Navajo Street have been ordered and
bids taken. The bids came in too high. The Council didn't award
continued
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Page Two
December 5, 1989
c:> 173rd/Navajo; 175th Ave.; Navajo
the project or deny the project. There remains pending
assessments on these properties until such time as one year has
passed or until such time as the Council would terminate the
project, whichever comes first.
The Mayor, Glenn Cook and myself have met with the people in this
neighborhood on two occasions. At the end of the meetings I felt
1) that people on 175th didn't want the improvement; 2) part of
the people on Navajo street North wanted the improvements but
didn't believe they wanted to pay the cost that was proposed; and
3) a group of people on Navajo street (south) still want the
improvements at cost up to $2450.
The Council should make some decisions or postpone the discussion
of this project for a couple of months until we can go back and
take another look at our special assessment policy considering
large and small parcels similar to this project. I believe the
construction prices are as good as any prices we will see unless
for some reason we can include this project with a larger project
and get the advantages of the bigger project.
This particular item has been on the following Council agendas:
May 3, 1988
May 16, 1989
June 6, 1989
June 20, 1989
July 5, 1989
July 25, 1989
August 15, 1989 (ordered improvement & preparation of plans &
specs)
August 17, 1989 (approved plans & specs, ordered ad for bids)
October 3, 1989 (award bid - both motions failed; the one to
reject the bid and the one to award the bid;
per the specs just expire))
If the Council doesn't intend to proceed on the 173rd/Navajo
project, I recommend the Council pass a resolution stating "the
Council hereby determines not to undertake the improvement as
ordered under resolution 140-89 dated 8/15/89.
Enclosure: Revised Cost Reports (letter from Glenn Cook, BRA)
o
o
~ 11 ~ Bonestroo
~ Rosene
U Anderlik &
1 \J 1 Associates
Engineers & Architects
Otto G. Bonesrroo. P.E.
Robert W Rosene. P.E.
Joseph C. Anderlik, PE-
Richard E. Turner, P.E.
James C. Olson, PE.
Glenn R. Cook. P.E.
Thomas E. Noyes. P.E.
Robert G. SchuniCht. P.E.
Marvin l. Sarvala, P.E.
Keich A. Gordon. P,E.
Richard W. Foster. P,E.
Donald C. Burgardt P,E.
Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E.
Mark A. Hanson. P.E.
Ted K. Field. P.E.
Mchael T. Rautmann. P.E.
Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E.
David O. Loskota. P,E.
Thomas W. Peterson. P.E.
Michael C. Lynch. P.E.
James R. Maland, P.E.
Kenneth P. Anderson, P,E.
Mark R. Rolfs, P.E.
Robert C. Russek, AJ.A.
Thomas E. Angus, P.E.
HOIAIard A. Sanford, P.e.
Daniel J. Edgerror:. P.E.
Mark A Seip, P.E.
Philip J. Caswell. P.E.
Mark D. WalHs, P.E.
Thomas R. Anderson, Al.A
Gary F. Rylander. P.E.
Miles 8. Jensen, P.E.
L. PhiUip Gravel Ill, P.E.
Charles A Erickson
leo M. Pawelsky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A
.r.}:..~, E ~ -~--.:.:-,:~ ~, -~----
N I ; t ~ ~j to U':""
. \i ~ 'f.J~.
, ~~~J.
CITY OF ANDOVEP
October 27, 1989
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Anoka, MN 55303
Attn: James Schrantz
Re: 173rd Avenue
File No. 1'1136
Dear Jim:
We have prepared ,a cost estimate for constructing all streets in the 173rd
Avenue area. The proposed construction would consist of the surfacing of
173rd Avenue, Navajo Street and the. east half of 175th Avenue. The west half
of 175th Avenue would be patched as necessary and overlaid with a new
bituminous surface. We have also included a cost estimate for completing an
overlay on Navajo Street south of 173rd Avenue as an alternate.
The estimated project cost for completing the work is as follows:
Part I
Part II
173rd Ave.; Navajo Street & 175th Ave.
Alternate-Navajo Street so. of 173rd Ave.
Total Cost
$146,500.00
21,420.00
$168,420.00
It is not recommended that Part II be completed at this time as the overlay
would be premature. The cost estimate for Part II is included to provide
additional information when evaluating the assessment procedure.
The proposed assessments based on various options for assessing the proj ect
would be as follows:
Option Project Cost Units on Navajo St. Total Cost/Unit
Street Units Unit
I $168,420.00 23 12 35 $4,810.00
II 146,500.00 23 12 35 4,190.00
III 146,500.00 23 23 6,370.00
IV 146,500.00 23 12* 35 5,090.00
V 146,500.00 23 \(12)** 29 5,050.00
VI 146,500.00 23 12*** 35 4,810.00
* Navajo South units assessed at $2450/unit.
** Navajo South units assessed at \ unit. ($2,545.00)
*** Navajo South units assessed $3020/unit - Part II would not be constructed.
o
Page 1
30 ~o f' 17'1? "', Lf.i;'JO
?/ i!L,C ~ 1'2- ~ 17t)0
;.. I).--u,,; t.- t/ NI 7..:::; r:..c-..' l ;.,' tf' C' ,.4-a v t"f ::;,qy.
~ 7" 1/,
0/(2 ;7;;." .t.rJ/"<;"
2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul. Minnesota 55113 · 612-636-4600
o
o
The city
assessment
VI.
could also develop other methods of assessing the project.
methods that appear to be most equitable would be options IV, V
The
or
If you have any questions please contact this office.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
/
~4~K~
Glenn R. Cook
GRC:dh
Page 2
L9/52
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
December 5, 1989
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard Koolick~
Finance Director
ITEM 3. Approve Resolution
NO. Bond Call
BY:
E UEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review and approve the
resolution relating to the calling of the following bonds:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1976A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1976B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1977A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1980C
BACKGROUND
At the November 7th City Council Meeting, the City Council
approved calling these bonds and was informed that the City
Attorney and Bond Counsel would be drafting a resolution to begin
the call process and that this resolution would return t9 Council
on December 5th.
The resolution is attached.
The 1976 and 1980 bonds are redeemable at any time. Council will
need to determine on which date they wish them called.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
o
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
Attorney at Law
470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 337-9300
MARY FRANCES SKALA
Direct Dial (612) 337-9234
November 28, 1989
Mr. Bill Hawkins
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N. W.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Redemption of General Obligation Bonds; City of Andover
Our File No. AN165-3
Dear Bill:
Enclosed is a resolution calling for redemption and prepayment of the following issues
of bonds:
a. $1,635,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1976
b. $ 780,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1977
c. $ 56,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1976
d. $ 98,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1980
The redemption notices for a. and b. above are attached to the resolution and should
be published in a financial newspaper no less than 30 days prior to the redemption
date. We will make sure this is done. . The deadline for December publication in
Northwestern Financial Review is December 8. The notices should also be mailed to
the paying agents for the bonds as indicated in the resolutions as soon as possible. You
may also want to send the paying agents a certified copy of the resolution.
Bonds noted at c. and d. above are redeemable on any date. I have left the redemption
dates blank in the resolution. These blanks should be completed with the date the City
will be prepaying the bonds. No redemption notices need be published for these two
issues.
Please return a certified copy of the resolution and an original affidavit of pUblication
of each hearing notice to us.
o
o
o
Mr. Bill Hawkins
Page Two
November 28, 1989
Please call if you have questions.
MFS:kt
Enclosures
cc: David J. Kennedy
Mary E. Molzahn
James R. Casserly
Very truly yours,
)~~
Mary Frances Skala
c
o
Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the
City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Council of
the City of Andover, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in the City of
Andover, on Tuesday, November 7, -1989, commencing at p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
* * *
* * *
* * *
Member
introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE REPAYMENT AND
REDEMPTION OF CERTAIN OUTSTANDING
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE CITY
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Andover, Anoka
County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City has issued and sold the following:
(a) General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1976 dated August
1, 1976 in the total principal amount of $1,635,000 (1976A Bonds). The
Series 1976A Bonds maturing after February 1, 1988 are subject to
redemption and prepayment on that and on any interest payment date
thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest.
1
o
o
(b) General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1976 dated
November 1, 1976 in the total principal amount of $56,000 (1976B Bonds).
The 1976B Bonds are subject to redemption and prepayment on any date at a
price of par plus accrued interest.
(c) General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1977 dated October
1, 1977 in the total principal amount of $780,000 (the 1977 Bonds). The 1977
Bonds maturing after February 1, 1989 are subject to redemption and
prepayment on that and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price
of par plus accrued interest.
(d) General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1980 dated August
1, 1980 in the total principal amount of $98,000 (the 1980 Bonds). The 1980
Bonds are subject to redemption and prepayment on any date at a price of
par plus accrued interest.
The 1976 A Bonds, 1976B Bonds, 1977 Bonds and 1980 Bonds are herein
collectively referred to as the "Bonds".
2. It is determined that it is in the best interests of the sound financial
management of the City that the Bonds be redeemed and prepaid in accordance
with their terms as follows:
(a) The 1976A Bonds maturing on February 1 in the years 1991 to
and including 1997, will be redeemed and prepaid on February 1, 1990 and
the 1976A Bonds are hereby called for redemption on that date.
(b) The currently outstanding principal amount of the 1976B Bonds
shall be redeemed and prepaid on and the 1976B Bonds are
hereby called for redemption on that date.
(c) The 1977 Bonds maturing on February 1 in the years 1991 to
and including 1998, will be redeemed and prepaid on February 1, 1990 and
the 1977 Bonds are hereby called for redemption on that date.
(d) The currently outstanding principal amount of the 1980 Bonds
shall be redeemed and prepaid on and the 1980 Bonds are
hereby called for redemption on that date.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to publish, in accordance with
law, the notices of call for redemption of the 1976A Bonds and the 1977 Bonds in
the forms attached hereto as Exhibits A and B and to mail copies of the notices to
the respective paying agents for the 1976A Bonds and the 1977 Bonds and to the
original purchasers thereof.
4. The Clerk is authorized to notify the original purchasers of the 1976
Bonds and the 1977 Bonds of the City's intent to redeem and prepay the 1976B
Bonds and the 1977 Bonds on the dates indicated in paragraphs 2(b) and 2(d) hereof.
2
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
o by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
o
3
o
o
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
) SS.
CITY OF ANDOVER
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of
Andover, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached
and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council held on
Tuesday, November 7, 1989, with the original thereof on file in my office and the
same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates
to the prepayment and redemption of certain general obligation bonds of the City.
WITNESS My hand as Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this _ day
of December, 1989.
City Clerk
City of Anoka, Minnesota
(SEAL)
4
o
o
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION
$1,635,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1976
CITY OF ANDOYER, MINNESOTA
Notice is hereby given that by order of the City Council of the City of
Andover, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on
February 1, 1990
all outstanding Bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement
Bonds of 1976, dated August 1, 1976, and having stated maturity dates of February
1 in the years 1991 through 1997, both inclusive, totaling $765,000 in principal
amount and bearing serial numbers 175 to 327, both inclusive.
The Bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to
February 1, 1990 on which date all interest on the Bonds will cease to accrue.
Holders of the Bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their
Bonds for payment with coupons attached at First Trust National Association,
paying agent, in the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, successor paying agent to First
National Bank of Saint Paul, on or before February 1, 1990.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/sl
Victoria Yolk
City Clerk
.,
5
o
o
EXlllBIT B
NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION
$780,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1977
CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
Notice is hereby given that by order of the City Council of the City of
Andover, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on
February 1, 1990
all outstanding Bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement
Bonds of 1977, dated October 1, 1977, and having stated maturity dates of
February 1 in the years 1991 through 1998, both inclusive, totaling $420,000 in
principal amount and bearing serial numbers 73 to 156, both inclusive.
The Bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to
February 1, 1990 on which date all interest on the Bonds will cease to accrue.
Holders of the Bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their
Bonds for payment with coupons attached at Norwest Bank Minnesota, National
Association, paying agent, in the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, successor paying
agent to Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis, on or before February 1,
1990.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/
Victoria V olk
City Clerk
6
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE npt"!pmhQY r; 1 QAQ
ITEM
NO.4. EIS Review/
Pro osed Site
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to authorize consulting attorney
Charlie Weaver, who the cities of Andover and Coon Rapids have
retained to work with us on Site Q, to negotiate agreements with
additonal consulting firms for the review of the EIS Site
Evaluation.
BACKGROUND
Anoka County is in the process of preparing an Environmental
Impact Statement for the proposed siting of a landfill in Anoka
County as required under state law, including Site Q which is
located at the border of the cities of Coon Rapids and Andover.
A couple of years ago, the cities of Coon Rapids and Andover
entered into a joint powers agreement where we retained attorney
Charles Weaver and consulting engineer James M. Montgomery and
Associates to review the Environmental Impact Statement.
Mayor Elling, Bill Ottensman, John Weaver, Greg Korstad (one of
Weaver's associates) and myself met and discussed the need for a
thorough environmental impact review.
The EIS will include issues beyond the expertise of either the
attorney or the consulting engineer.
RECOMMENDATION
In order to insure an adequate review of the EIS, we propose a
technical review team be retained to review the Environmental
Impact Statement.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
Page Two
December 5, 1989
<:) EIS Review/proposed Site Q
We are, therefore, proposing that several other additional
consultants be retained to create a review team to cover all
issues of the Environmental Impact Statement.
Additional consultants proposed are:
ERM North Central, Inc. to review facility technical issues.
Moe Dorton to review socio-economic impacts.
Hoisington Group, Inc. to review land use issues.
Lynn Bly & Associates, Inc. to review waste management and
general issues.
Jeffrey Stevens & Lyle Bradley to review human and
wildlife/plant life health risks.
In the November 21st packet I included the memorandum from Charlie
Weaver along with a profile of the consulting firms and their
principle participants in the study.
The agreement that Charlie Weaver would negotiate with the
recommended consultant will be brought back to the City Council
for formal approval.
These actions will require an amendment to the Andover/Coon Rapids
Joint Powers Agreement that currently exists between those two
cities.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Under recently passed state legislation Metropolitan Council
reimbursement is available for landfill site evaluation up to the
amount of $50,000 for each community. $100,000 would therefore be
available to the combined cities of Andover and Coon Rapids.
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n~c~mher 5. 1989
ITEM Election Equipment.
NO. Cont.
5.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin. \~
BY:V Volk \:. ..
APPROJlj ~OR
AGEN~A i
i
BY: '1
I
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm.
.
In accordance with Council request, I will be at the meeting to
answer what questions you have regarding the optical scan voting
equipment.
Attached is a copy of the Joint Powers Agreement for the Purchase
of Optical Scan Vote Tabulation Equipment. If Council approves
the purchase of this equipment for the 1990 election, we need to
have the agreement signed and sent back to the City of Blaine.
Some of the reasons for going to optical scan equipment include:
o Punch cards are not accurate.
o Candidate names and issues are not printed on punch card
ballots.
o If a voter makes a mistake with optical scan, such as crossing
party lines in a primary or over-voting, their ballot will be
rejected by the tabulation equipment and they can vote over.
o The results for each precinct will be known within IS minutes
after the polls close.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
o TO
SECOND BY
o
o
.JOINT RMR> 1IGREI.H'Nl' R:R 'IBE ~ OF
ClI?:rICAL SCAN VOlE TAElJIATICR E;PlD!ENl'
'!he parties to this agreem:mt shall be political subdivisions
under the laws of the state of Minnesota located within the County of
Anoka.
~":I'I1.:
'!he parties hereto are authorized to enter into this agreement
pursuant to Minnesota statutes !i471.59.
'!he parties have detennined that the pmch card voting system
currently used by the parties does not have voter confidence ani is not
acceptable to many legislators because it does not pennit the names of the
candidates ani the issues up for consideration to be printed on the actual
ballot.
'!he Anoka Q:lunty Auditor's task force on July 23, 1987 adopted a
recorrunendation that optical scan voting equipnent be obtained for the 1992
elections.
'!he parties agree that the optical scan system would provide a
rrore efficient an:l prOOuctive method of vote tabulation.
An anticipated price per unit decrease for the optical scan system
between the 1987 task force rec::c:mnenjation an:l the 1992 elections has not
occurred ani prices continue to increase.
'!he parties hereto fini that by purchasing identical optical scan
equipment, the parties can provide each other with emergency backup
services in the event any party's equipnent should fail. '!he parties
further fini that through a joint pm::haSe, the parties will likely be
able to obtain optical scan equiprent at a rrore favorable cost per unit
due to the volume of units being acquired.
N:M, 'lli.tJ:<t;rut<B, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. '!he parties hereto have joined together pursuant to Minnesota
o
o
statutes g471.59 for the purpose of acquirin;J optical scan vote tabulation
equipment and establi.shirg policies and procedures to assist each other in
the event any party's equipnent shaJld fail.
2. '!he political sul:xlivisions eligible to became parties to this
agreement shall be the cities of Arxiover, Blaine, circle Pines, Columbia
Heights, Ccon Rapids, East Bethel, Fridley, Ham lake, Line lakes, Sprin;J
lake Park and the Town of Oak Grove.
3. '!he parties agree to pm::hase and maintain identical optical
scan vote tabulation equipnent.
4. '!he city of Fridley will advertise for and receive seale::l.
bids in accordance with law for the joint purchase of the optical scan
vote tabulation equipment based on a CClll1IIPn set of specifications.
5. '!he parties further agree to establish joint policies and
procedures to be followed in the event any party's equipment shaJld fail.
'!hose policies and procedures shall be awrove::l. by each of the parties
hereto and shall be reviewe::l. annually.
6. '!he cost of maintaining the optical scan vote tabulation
equipment shall be the responsibility of each irrlividual party.
7. '!his agreement shall became effective upon adoption by any
five of the political sul:xlivisions named in paragrafil 2 above, but shall
be effective only as to those parties who fonnally adopt this ag1:eerrent.
8. Execution of a facsimile of this a.,p:eement by any eligible
party shall be evidence of adoption of the ag1:eerrent.
9. Execute:l facsimiles of this agreement shall be forNarde::l. to
the Blaine City Clerk, 9150 Central Avenue NE, Blaine, Minnesota 55434.
10. Arrj party may withdraw frc:m this agreem:mt by servin;J written
notice thereof at least six m:>nths prior to any election upon each of the
other parties hereto. After this agreement has became effective as
-2-
o
o
provided in paragra];h 7, the agreenent shall remain in full force and
effect even though the parties hereto may bE><::r'm=> less than five.
IN wr.INESS ltiEmDF, each of the un::lersigned municipalities has
caused this agreement to be signed on its behalf as of the day and year
set out belCM.
Date:
ATl'EST :
Vicki Volk, Clerk
Date:
ATI'EST:
Joyce 'IWistol, City Clerk
Date:
ATl'EST :
Date:
ATl'EST :
William Elrite, City Clerk
Date:
ATl'EST :
Betty Backes, City Clerk
CITY OF ANIXNER
By:
Jim Elling, Mayor
By:
James E. Schrantz, Administrator
CITY OF BIAlliE
BY:
Elwyn Tinklenberg, Mayor
BY:
ron Foss, City Manager
CITY OF CIRCLE PINES
BY:
Marshall D9hl, Mayor
BY:
James W. Keinath, Administrator
CITY OF OJIIJMBIA HEIGHI'S
BY:
Dale Hadtxath, Mayor
BY:
Robert Bocwinski, City Manager
CITY OF CCXJN RAPIDS
BY:
Robert Lewis, Mayor
BY:
Gary W. Jackson, city Manager
-3-
o
o
Late :
ATI'EST :
Late :
ATI'EST:
Shirley A. }1';li'lp;Ua, City Clerk
Late :
ATI'EST :
Late :
ATI'EST :
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk-
Treasurer
Date:
ATI'EST :
Date:
ATI'EST :
CITY OF EAST BEIHEL
BY:
Roger Grams, Mayor
CITY OF FRIDlEY
BY:
william W. Nee, Mayor
BY:
William W. Burns, City Manager
CITY OF HAM lAKE
BY:
Marilyn Schultz, Mayor
CITY OF LlNO IAKES
BY:
Benjamin Benson, Mayor
BY:
Rarrlall Schumacher, Administrator
'ICMN OF OAK GROVE
BY:
Rebert A. Preuss, 01ainnan of the
Board
BY:
Jucli Peterson, Clerk
CITY OF SPRING lAKE PARK
BY:
Ibn Masterson, Mayor
BY:
Ibnald Busch, Clerk-'I'reasUrer
-4-
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
December 5, 1989
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
BY, Jay Blak~City
Planner
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee
ITEM 6.
NO. MUSA Discussion
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the enclosed
information for a possible expansion of the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area.
BACKGROUND
As you are aware, an expansion of the MUSA area greater than fifty
(50) acres in size requires Metropolitan Council approval of a
major Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The following requests have
been received by the City Council and referred to the Planning and
Zoning Commission:
Gorham Builders - Gorham had originally requested an additional 40
acres of the Winslow Hills sketch plan. Staff initially suggested
that we would prefer to limit the number of MUSA area expansion
requests and asked that Gorham also submit a request for the
entire Winslow Hills sketch plan. (approximately 160 acres)
Continental Develo~ment Corporation - this request is for the
property known as Santa's Tree Farm". During the 1987 MUSA
expansion, the owners of the property requested that their
property not be included in the MUSA expansion. (approximately 70
acres)
Hills Incorporated - The Hills Inc. group is requesting that the
remaining property in the Hills of Bunker Lake be included in the
MUSA area. During the 1987 MUSA expansion this was included in
the city's request and was removed during the review and
negotiating process with the Met. Council. (approximately 80
acres)
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
o TO
SECOND BY
o
Page 2
MUSA Discussion
December 5, 1989
Gaughen Companies - There are two separate requests for MUSA area
from the Gaughen Companies. The first request is for the
remaining portion of the Old Colony Estates Sketch Plan.
(approximately 60 acres) The second request is for property north
of the Winslow Hills development on Crosstown Boulevard Northwest.
(approximately 102 acres)
Holst propert~ - George and Diane Holst have requested that their
land also be included in this request. This request has not yet
been received by the City Council. (approximately 10 acres)
The five requests total 482 acres or roughly 1,157 lots (based on
2.4 lots per acre). See the enclosed map for specific locations
of the requests.
EXISTING URBAN LOT AVAILABILITY
The Andover Planning Department has calculated the number of
existing urban lots currently available. Attachment #2 indicates
that as of October 1, 1989, there were 765 lots available. This
number does not include Hidden Creek East Phase II, Hills of
Bunker Lake Phase IV, Kennsington Estates Phase IV, Old Colony
Estates Phase II and Woodland Creek Phase II.
Also not included in this number is the potential replatting of
Watts Garden Acres with nearly 168 potential lots. An approximate
number of available lots would be in the neighborhood of 1,350.
CURRENT BUILDING TRENDS
Andover has seen a rapid increase in the number of homes being
built, both in the urban and rural areas. Attachment #3 outlines
the shift in new home construction from rural to urban. In 1985,
slightly more than 50 percent of homes were built in the urban
area. Through October 1, 1989, nearly 80 percent of new homes
built in 1989 have been built in the urban area. These numbers do
not include the 32 new homes built during the month of October.
As the communities south of Andover build out their residential
area, Andover will continue to see an increased or stable demand
for urban lots.
Staff estimates that 75 percent of all residential construction
will occur in the urban area over the next 3 years. With this in
mind, we can expect to build on 275 lots/year (825 in three years)
in the urban area, or approximately 120 acres per year.
o
o
Page 3
MUSA Discussion
December 5, 1989
Attachment #4 outlines the MUSA expansion plan approved by the
City of Andover during the 1987 MUSA expansion.
RECENT MUSA EXPANSION REQUEST
The City of Andover recently completed an application for an
expansion of the MUSA area for the Bruce Hay manufactured home
park proposal. The application was a direct result of multiple
court actions against the City by Mr. Hay.
The Metropolitan Council has denied the application due to the
following three reasons:
A. The request is not contiguous to the existing MUSA
boundary.
B. The City did not document a need for additional MUSA area
for the year 2000.
C. The City does not comply with the Metropolitan Council
rural development policy of one/ten or four/forty.
The staff report for the proposal indicates that we will utilize
145 acres of MUSA area in 1989-90 and 410 acres for the rest of
the decade (41 acres per year). The Planning staff questions the
accuracy of these forecasts.
The Metropolitan Council will make a final decision on or before
November 22, 1989. The decision will have a direct bearing on the
available acreage for urban development. If approved, the MUSA
will be expanded by 50 acres.
LAND SWAP OPTIONS
The Metropolitan Council might suggest that if property needs to
be added to the MUSA area, the City could swap land currently
within the MUSA for new MUSA land. The only large parcel
without an active sketch plan or plat would be the Melvin Roth
property south of the WDE landfill. The property has a lien on it
and is a difficult property to develop.
Several swap options might include the the Woodland Creek Golf
Course property, City owned drainage area, UPA Substation.
The swap would make just less than 200 acres available for other
developments.
o
Page 4
MUSA Discussion
c:> December 5, 1989
COUNCIL OPTIONS
A. The Andover City Council may direct staff to prepare a Major
Comprehensive Plan Amendment for any or all of the aforementioned
projects, also scheduling the appropriate public hearing.
B. The Andover City Council may request additional information
from the City Council, city staff or property owners regarding the
potential MUSA expansion.
C. The Andover City Council may table the requests and
incorporate them into the major update of the City Comprehensive
Plan and Development Framework.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the request at
their November 14, 1989 meeting. At that time the Commission
recommended that the items be incorporated into the major
Comprehensive Plan update, currently under consideration by the
Comprehensive Plan Task Force.
See the enclosed minutes from the November 14, 1989 meeting.
o
8
'"
::.0::
o
Z
<t
] 1 ..
j _ .~ _____IGi
\ "l
. ;~'i\~
i "i.1l~"
..~
0t
~ - \.
.-r-,(t;'::"'i''' "I,i!!--.- I " ';.\
I ~ ~~:. .\.\ i ~i= \----------\--'
.\ '" I- L;~ . \ --f---- i=-"1! ::.=' I riI.
._...~ ~I . / I .~ . 1- 111 I
, It II. . -
~ .. .! \ _p _'~:~- __ I ,] ~~ ________
o ~~ tf--~- -----~r~~~- ' II 1/1
, '=l.J - A. y:~~; , . . "II / \ I - '~"-...'-'
l?m 1\" ':11-=--' y_ ~~~~
' /'- ...!Q+. \. ~ ~
L~ ~r: :01' I /...: t 1'1.\ 1 ' r:- I .' ..." ~
... t~ I . ':' I ~
I . 15. \1 .1 ,/ -- /--+'4-+ _J_~ -- . _ ~
--'k- -~~ r I .~~~.
- ~,,~ /' '" . .' .. I I. I ._J
= ~~ ~ . .. ~,...l'
-~/ ~~~ ,. .-----~! - .
..----
= -- -- rj I- . : = . . '. I = ~
/ I i -- .~. "'iH.J- 1..
1./ I : n I=- r-:r.ll. 'j;,'"n.,'
/ \ 'Ii~ ' ..-- ~..-
.I! ~ ...---
L
- ~~ -~~---- ----- !--~-
-V~I
. /.
L-
\
. =
.
I
I
.
1--'
:=1
-
'-'-
, ....
... '"
li
~ 0
~ ~ l
~ II) I
'\ .~ ~ ~~----.
i ~ ~
~ "! -0 ---- I
- ------.- ~ ~ 1 ~ --.-- ~ ~~rr
1111 "-h' \~~
'1J(1jj,~0~~/-":' '~-..;.., ,- ,c-
r' ... I!'!..: ;:. ~..
\ . <:i. c.l'_ h ~t ~ ",0;;;; . rI
_H_ .... . -:.1 .J.' .~ '1 'I ~ .!lJ ,,-...J ~ I'
I.. .,.\'(.\. 'i" . ::::s llC ,/"
. ,. . ,\)o::-r.:- i' , . (:) ~ ... ,
Ir'. "I.'''.~' i. . . Q:: -..j .
UL~W .~ _
o ~ '.tF~~41' ~~~) .:
i--=-t---n,\ I ~ ...
I I ~ . . -------, -TOO --"f ! .
.~ I' .tl., --- I
. LLLL ~ I j: .:.j 11,,\
I~ I~! 1\ -- '~'.~ j(',:"
~' .;, .. '~li . I~~ .ll:1I '0
. .. _ . c--c, ~! 1 . '\,. ,"\1
_. - On
-_ T -+.
.--1--
p:'
,i;-:'~
~~....:.
.\,.,......:,J.:.:..:::.. -
~. ....
,-
I
. I
\ I
-t-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,. u. ~
~~ I
I
~~
Qj
~
..
\1
..-.-
I'll- r-.... .:::..::::
I~;, .I---~ '-;.
, !.'i !'l ,~ ~i I
II.' '-- co..,
l ~ I~ ~
.1--- ' I;>
J
=1 '
".
.. .
...\
I:
II
1111
r,irrm~~
II!I
\
\.
1-
:
.."I~"" III
.,,,.#,
. . il
.... , I
-- w
.. i j} !~
" 5~
.
. " ~ .~
- --;'7 ~
~
rfI' ..E2]
....
i~L
I
I
I
!
\ '.
I
1HI.eJeN,J :I Z
AREAS WITHIN CURRENT MUSA BOUNDARY (2000)
OCTOBER 1, 1989
I{Q
~iE: OF ADDITION
Auditor's ~ub No. 137
Auditor's Sub No. 82
Bent Creek Estates
Brandon's Lakeview Estates
Chapman's 1st Addition
Chapman's 2nd Addition
Chapman's 3rd Addition
Chapman's 4th Addition
Chapman's 5th Addition
Chapman's 6th Addition
Creekhaven
Creekridge Estates
Creekside Estates
Cunningham Addition
Green Acres
Hartfiel's Estates
Hidden Creek 1st Addition
Hidden Creek 2nd Addition
Hidden Creek 3rd Addition
Hidden Creek East 1st Addition
Hills of Bunker Lake 1st. Addition
Hills of Bunker Lake 2nd Addition
~;lls of Bunker Lake 3rd Addition
~:~;~~g~~~ ~~~~~~~n1st Addition
Kensington Estates 2nd Addition
Kensington Estates 3rd Addition
Lakeview Terrace Area
Meadowcreek Estates Area
Northglen & Northglen 3rd Addition
Northglen 2~d Addition
Northglen 2nd Addition
Northglen 4th Addition
Northglen 5th Addition
Northwoods Addition & Plat 2
Oak Bluff 1st Addition
Oak Bluff 2nd Addition
Old Colony Estates 1st Addition
Quickstrom Addition
Red Oaks Manor 1st Addition
Red Oaks Manor 2nd Addition
Red Oaks Manor 3rd Addition
Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition
Red Oaks Manor 5th Addition
Red Oaks Manor 6th Addition
Rosella's Addition
Shady Knoll
shirley's Estates
Smith's Green Acres
~
TOTAL
LOTS
45
91
8
4
10
10
10
10
15
11
26
61
6
9
83
58
46
62
63
47
149
64
79
19
76
32
39
98
95
113
38
75
36
36
107
25
74
55
33
23
16
25
119
50
29
25
20
6
15
1989 LOTS VACANT
BUILT LOTS
1
1
9
1
2
8
10
22
10
6
17
1
6
3
8
4
5
1
32
10
1
3
6
7
o
o
o
o
o
1
2
14
3
5
o
2
31
4
4
29
19
51
50
48
3
50
24
31
3
4
o
o
4
2
o
4
4
64
50
o
1
o
o
o
10
19
6
o
o
3
,
,.
i
BUILT
ON
I:"
,
42
85
1
4
10
10
10
10
14
9
12
58
1
9
81
27
42
58
34
28
98
14
31
16
26
8
8
95
91
113
38
71
34
36
103
21
10
5
33
22
16
25
119
40
10
19
20
6
12
1HifA~/"~
Musa Boundary
~:kS 9 2 1 8
Weises Addition 5 1 4
Winslow Hills 80 13 53 27
woodland Creek 1st Addition 87 2 84 3
woodland Creek 2nd Addition 46 2 44 2
Woodland Terrace 1st Addi tion 77 3 7 70
Woodland Terrace 2nd Addition 10 2 4 6
woodland Terrace 3rd Addition 7 1 6
Woodland Terrace 4th Addition page 1 62 7 2 60
Woodland Terrace 4th Addi tion Page 2 24 6 18
Woodland Terrace 5th Addition 7 1 1 6
Wood ridge Acres 17 0 17
sub-Total 2677 765 1912
Others (See Following Sheet)
TOTAL BUILT
OTHERS LOTS VACANT ON
Section 27 32 3 29
Section 28 0 0 0
Section 29 41 6 35
Section 32 28 1 27
C':'~ .tion 33 59 7 52
\Cj
TOTAL 160 17 143
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLATS
TOTAL
LOTS
Hidden Creek East phase II
Hills of Bunker Lake Phase IV
Kensington Estates Phase IV
Old Colony Estates
woodland Creek Phase II
TOTAL
116
60
65
85
91
417
SKETCH PLANS
APPROX.
TOTAL
171
171
Harstad properties
iC..'.
(
"
A#4tAWtVCr #3
c9"'.
~"
'-:!;'!;.' .
".", .
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
File
October 12, 1989
-
Andover Building
Jay Blake, City planne
Homes built in Urban Area
The question has been raised regarding the percentage of
built in the Urb~n Area versus homes in the rural area.
calculated the p~rcentages for the past 3 years and also
through the end of September.
homes
I have
1989
y~ t OF HOMES URBAN AREA PERCENTAGE
1986 289 156 54%
1987 381 245 64%
1988 356 256 72%
'c'
;
1989 *269 213 79% i
,
* Through september 1989 i':
~.
[
(~.."
W
11HarJ.~ :11.1/
<0 I I I I
-' CD I I I. I
UJ CD CD !
000 ~... i i
'" Nee
1 <f)
><( ...- z 0:' I
..0
~ CCUJ <0 0 <( .,Z -1.\
UJcc I- U5 E ::; .
0 Z ..::;
'~',y 00<( W W <f) 0::;
..0
CCI- ...., I- W .00
0 X Z
UJz a: w z
0.. :E
$:UJ >-
l- I-
UJ:E z :l ri
0000 w i= w
:;; >
>-00 w ::> 0
ccUJ > ~ 0
00 0 Z z
<f.:cn a: ::> <(
!::<( 0.. a:
Z ~ I-
<(
00
!-":T I
~
-.
I
(fLti' -.~,
..-"':_'''1
..~.p :.:.
i
-'-
\
I
i
i
1..
I \
. ..---:------r-...--
I
I
I
; .
I~
...- U
.-'
... ,
t::l
~ ~
C) oq;
Q- -..J
co
c,
(0
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 14, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page six
It is the intent of the commission to republish notice of Public Hearing.
It is the intent of the commission-.to include in the city newsletter a listing
of issues being discussed by the planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Blake noted that due to budget cuts the newsletter will be published less
frequently in 1990.
Peek suggested newsletter include the information thatAnoka union is official
city newspaper, . and agenda items will be published ~n Union.
Commissioner Vistad made a MOTION that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
recommend to the Andover City Council that the Horseman's Council be reestablished
as soon as possible.
Second to motion by Gretchen Sabel. All commissioners favor motion; motion
passed.
preliminary Metropolitan Urban Service Area Review - Comp Plan Amendment
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was asked to review the fOllowing
requests for expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area.
Information regarding requests was relayed by Jay Blake.
Requests were submitted by:
t
Gorham Builders
Continental Development Corporation
Hills Incorporated
Gaughen Companies
Holst Property
The five requests total 482 acres or roughly 1,157 lots (based on 2.4 lots
per acre.) A map enclosed in packet details specific location of requests.
Currently there are 765 existing lots available within MUSA
417 preliminary plats within MUSA have been approved
160 - 170 lots will be available in Watts
1.,350 lots within MUSA
Based on current trends, 1,350 lots will last 3 - 4 years.
Additional information regarding recent MUSA expansion request, and land swap
options is contained in 11/14/89 Request for planning commission Action memo.
Mr. Vistad stated that lots available are upper bracket; and therefore not
really available to all home buyers.
Mr. Blake stated the Met Council looks at acres, not lots.
Mr. Vistad recommends looking at building trends in neighboring communities.
cont'd...
(0
(~
~-,_.
~
planning and Zoning Commission
November 14, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Seven
Mr. Peek asked what time frame developers are looking at. Blake replied some
developers are flexible at this point and are looking at request for 1991 - 1992.
A few developers have more immediate request.
Ferris questioned the need to expand now when the building needs of the city can
be met for the next three years. He believes city should retain the valuable
option to swap. Rural development is threatened if city allows expansion of
MUSA.
A representative from Winslow Hills was present to discuss request with
commission. She stated there are currently homes on 27 lots out of 80. She
believes they will be sold out next year. They have been selling a little over
a year.
Mr. Ferris felt trends would indicate Winslow has a two year supply of lots.
Winslow wants MUSA within a year.
Chuck Cook, representing Continental Development Corporation, stated he has a
contract to purchase tree farm. Two years ago he requested approval for develop-
ment of 2 1/2 acre lots but request was denied by City Council. Mr. Cook asked
Planning and Zoning Commission to give his request consideration. He spent
11 months to obtain plat approval and the process for obtaining MUSA approval
through Met Council will take another six months.
Bud Holtz stated he bought his land four years ago and now because of increased
property taxes he may want to develop.
Pease asked why Planning and Zoning Commission is not addressing. broader scope
rather than looking at requests from five developers.
Gretchen Sabel made a MOTION that the Planning and zoning Commission recommend
to the Andover City Council to postpone decision on requests until such time
MUSA expansion is reviewed as part of the Comprehensive Plan. MUSA expansion
issues will be addressed early in Comprehensive Plan Update procedure. Currently
there is a four year supply of lots within city.
Commissioner Ferris seconded the motion. All commissioners agree to motion;
MOTION passed.
Alarm Ordinance
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission was requested to review the draft
alarm ordinance, as presented by Jay Blake.
Blake stated the City Attorney questioned whether existing systems would be subject
to provisions of ordinance. Sabel suggested they be required to register but
permit fee be waived. All new alarm systems and upgrades will be subject to fee.
Mr. Ferris stated the options to offset administrative costs due to ordinance
are to increase taxes or impose a users fee. He believes this case has strong
merit for a users fee.
cont'd...
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n9~elRS9r B, 1989
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO.7. Speed Study/157th
Avenue
BY:
The City Council is requested to review the attached letter from
MNDOT received in 1986 concerning the speed limit on 157th Avenue.
At that time (1986) the City Council believed the speed limit to
be appropriate and didn't order a new speed study but believed the
1976 study to be adequate.
Don Jacobson asked that the 1989 City Council review the MNDOT
recommendation.
This letter was brought to our attention again due to a speeding
violation that the speeding motorist took the City to court over
and the motorist wanted to use this letter as part of his defense.
The City has other streets posted the same after being
reconstructed as before at 35 mph.
Examples: South Coon Creek Drive
University Avenue
Ward Lake Drive
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
F--- ~..
i('" ~l'\ttESo~\1q.
S; ~.
. ~ ~.
. ~ ~~
. l' OF li\l>-~
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, I'vlinnesota . 55422
.,
, .
,
t'';
I
(m2) lS~o.Xl'XI
593-8544
April 4; 1986
James E. Schrantz, City Engineer
PUblic Works Direct<;lr. .. ;....~.._,
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown ~oulevard N.W.
Anoka, MN 55303
Re: Speed Zoning - 157th Ave. N.W.
. . City of Andover
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
The city of Ham Lake recently requested a speed zoning study for 157th
Ave. N.E. between University Avenue and Trunk Highway 65. While per-
forming the study, we noticed that the city of Andover has a posted
speed limit of 35 mph on 157th Avenue N.W. to the west of the study area.
We assume that the 35 mph speed limit is the result of a speed. limit
authorization issued on September 2, 1976 and that you might not be
aware the study on which the authorization is based, was for a 24 foot
sand~urface.d street. Because' 157th Ave. N.W. has been reconstructed
iince 1976 and now has a bitumin~~s surface and wider road width, the
35 mph speed limit appears to be unreasonably low and it could be un-
enforceable. (The study in Ham Lake resulted in a 50 mph speed limit
with advisory signing for curves.)
-,;;; ..,....--.;,
..,-;. .~ ,......;;- ",,~-.
To avoid an indefensible speed limit situation and to assure r~asonable
. traffic control, we are suggesting that the city of Andover request a
new speed zoning study for 157ch Ave. N.W. between CSAH 18 and Univer-
sity Avenue. If a new study is not desired, it would seem prudent to
consider removing the existing speed limit signing.
Sincerely,
. J. ,(//
-----./p~~~. '
( ... J. S. Katz, 1>-:-f.
Dis t dc t . T~-!I.ff.~c _Eng i.flee r
cc: Anoka County Sheriff
,..
JSK:pn:EB
o
. _ -~-_.....- ._'.. ... "'-'-' ~ -........ ......-'....
All EC/u.11 OppollUllily Elllplo)'cr
~'~.I
"
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA SECTION
NO. staff, ~ommittee,
Commi
Admini s tra ti on
ITEM
NO.
8. Open Burning,
Continued
BY:
Attached is a memo from Bill Hawkins
, .
~ob palm~r and others were going to check with
~nformat~on back from them as of this writing.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
PCA.
FOR
I haven't any
o
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 0
520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 O~/p~
Telephone (612) 296-6300 LSl.~
MINNESOTA 1990
13~ tkmt!<<- 'YJ
~y'ce Ii/I
.. . _.__.c,c. I;J/fl
R'. "" E - -.- ., ~ ...-:--
. L:Eilii"f
i GO~1;B91U
-10
November 27, 1989
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard
Andover, Minnesota 55304
North West
To Whom It May Concern:
CITY OF ANDOVER
RE: OPEN BURNING
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is in the process
of updating the open burning files. Our records indicate that
Roger Palmer, Fire Chief, and Ritchie Larson, Fire Marshal have
been authorized to issue permits in the City of Andover since
April, 1984.
The MPCA requests the following information: a copy of the
letter stating the delegation of authority including the person's
name, title, mailing address, telephone number and a copy of the
ordinance adopting Minn. Rules parts 7005.0700-.0820 Open Burning
Restrictions and Permitting Requirements.
Please submit this information in writing by December 26, 1989.
If you have any questions, you may contact me at (612) 296-6707.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
~~ ~m~
cqu~e M. Deneen
nforcement Unit
Regulatory Compliance Section
Division of Air Quality
JMD/lmb2.14
GJ
cc: Open Burning File
o
Regional Offices: Dul.uth' Brainerd' Detroit Lakes. Marshall. Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled Paper
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
December 5, 1989
DATE
o
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR
NO. Staff and Committee Finance AGE~~
ITEM 10. 1989 Budget Howard Koolick ~
NO. Adjustment Finance Director
BY: BY:
REQUEST Ij
The Andover City Council is requested to approve an adjustment of
the 1989 budget to properly reflect the certificate of indebted-
ness payments and the tax revenue to finance the payments.
BACKGROUND
Under generally accepted accounting principles, the payment of
debt and the receipt of revenue to make the payments should be
accounted for in a debt service fund and not the general fund.
In 1989 as in prior years, the City has included the certificate
of indebtedness activity in the general fund budget. The City's
auditor recommended that the 1990 budget be prepared with
the debt service activity in a separate fund.
The adjustment as detailed below would simply move the ~udgeted
activity related to the certificates of indebtedness from the
general fund to the certificate of indebtedness fund.
Increase/(Decrease) in Budget
Certificate of
General Indebtedness
Fund Fund
Revenues:
Current Ad Valorem $( 72,674) $ 72,674
Homestead Credit $ ( 27,335) $ 27,335
Total $(100,009) $100,009
~enditures:
De t Service:
Accounting Dept. $( 24,100)
Fire Protection Dept. $( 17,500)
Rescue Service Dept. $( 6,450)
Civil Defense Dept. $( 23,800)
Streets & High. Dept. $( 10,800)
Snow & Ice Dept. $( 13,200)
Total $( 95,850) $ 95,850
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
TO
City Council Meeting
December 5, 1989
1989 Budget Adjustment
o
A quick review of the figures indicates that the adjustment is
unbalanced, i.e. there is more revenue than expenditures. This is
due, in part, to the requirement that the City levy 105% of debt
service payments. It should be stressed that this is only a
budget adjustment and will not affect the actual amounts, which
will be accounted for in the certificate of indebtedness fund.
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Approve the budget adjustment as presented.
2. Approve the budget adjustment with amended figures.
3. Deny the budget adjustment and continue to budget for these
items incorrectly in 1989.
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
December 5, 1989
DATE
ITEM 11. Review/Rescue Squa
NQ Incentive Pay
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard Koolick ~
Finance Director
BY:
APP:~i.D FOR
AGEL ~
BY, / ,l)
V
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff and Committees
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the incentive
pay program for the City of Andover Rescue Squad.
The Andover City Council is also requested to review the timing of
the incentive pay program.
BACKGROUND
This item comes to the City Council tonight to follow-up on a
motion made in 1987 relating to the rescue squad incentive pay.
On December 15, 1987, the City Council approved a motion to
establish a point pay incentive program for 1986-1987, and 1988
and that the system be reviewed at the end of 1988. As far as
the staff could determine, this review was not made.
The minutes from 1987 indicate that the incentive pay pr'ogram was
set up in lieu of a pension program. The pension program was
not used because of the expense involved in funding and setting it
up.
While the incentive pay program was not reviewed in 1988 as
mentioned above, it was included by the rescue squad as a separate
line item on the 1989 budget submitted to staff. It was included
in the salary line item in the budget approved by Council.
The minutes from 1987 are not specific on what grounds the review
should be made or what options should be investigated.
The second issue that staff would like discussed by Council is the
timing of the incentive pay. Historically, the incentive pay has
been made after year-end and has covered the calendar year. The
rescue squad as requested the 1989 pay before Christmas and to
begin using a year that would run from December 1 to November 30.
This is similar to the timeframe used by the fire department for
their point pay. The fire department uses a November 1 to
October 31 year.
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
city Council Meeting
December 5, 1989
Review/Rescue Squad Incentive Pay
o
TO summarize, the City Council needs to discuss the following two
questions:
1. Should the rescue service incentive pay be continued
retroactive to January 1, 1989 and for how long?
2. what time period should the pay cover and when should it be
paid?
o
, ,;,-~~~:
-Ii
.;;~
~J:
. . ':~~~
:/,
'0
;.,
.,,!
RESCUE SERVICE INCENTIVES/GENGLER
Paul Gengler, Rescue Service Coordinator, reported he has not been
able to find a satisfactory relief association program for the rescue
service, proposing, another solution to provide an incentive to retain
volunteers on the rescue squad.
Mr. Gengler explained the City has contributed $250 per year to every
firefighter toward the relief association. The rescue service has
been in effect for seven years, and nothIng has been put toward a
relief association. As a temporary measure, he proposed instead that.
a schedule be established.to increase the points per call based on
years .of service for the rescue volunteers. For 0 to 1 years of
service, each call would be 1 point or $6.25 per point as per the
budget. From 1 t02years of service, add 1/8 point, or $.77 more per
point. From 2 to.3 years, add 1/4 point, or $1.54 more per point.
From 3 to 4 years of service, an additional $2.31 per point; and at
the end of 5 years,$3~89 more per point.
Regular City Council Meeting
December 15, 1987 - Minutes
Page 11
(Rescue Service Incentives/Gengler, Continued)
Mr. Gengler hoped this would work for the next year or two until some
kind of relief association can be set up. He asked that this be made
retroactive for 1987, which would require an additional $1,600 in
their bUdget. Plus it would mean an additional $3,500 for the 1988
budget. He determined this would be less costly to the City than
contributing $250.~oward a relief association for each person on the
rescli;e squad. Mr. 'Gengl er stated he is al so consider ing the
adjustment be given .as a bonus at the end of the year.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we authorize an
expenditure of up to $1,600 for point incentive payments to the rescue
squad for 1986-87, and move that we authorize the expenditure of up to
$3,500 for 1988, and note that wIth' the Increased incentive pay comes
", the adoption of the recommended point increase system in I ieu of a
pension program for the rescue squad; the system to be reviewed at the
end of 1988. Motion carried unanimously.
o
GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT
d'Arcy Bosell, Zoning Administrator, revIewed the proposed gradIng and
filling permit form, noting there are three ordinances which require
such permits.
Council discussed the form, some thinking it was quite complicated for
an Individual to flll out, that it was more for developers or those
with more expertise in the area. Ms. Bosell stated there will be
instructions, plus there may be Items which do not apply to a
particular request which would be marked not applicable.
Council felt the sheet explaining the information needed was too
specIfic, suggesting words such as "accurate" In Items 2 and 3a be
deleted so one wOlllrln't h""", tn h""", ",..~,,~..'~ "'~~~ ~_ __ ~ LL
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
o.
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
December 5, 1989
ITEM
NO.
Lundby Resolution
12.
BY: d I Arcy Bosell
, ~rJl\
J'7
~~~~~~~R
BY: Yl
I
November
regard to
At the direction of the City Council at your meeting on
7, 1989, the attached Resolution has been prepared with
the Larry and Catherine Lundby Lot Split Request.
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -89
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST OF LARRY AND
CATHERINE LUNDBY AT 17762 NW ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission has reviewed the
request of Larry and Catherine Lundby to combine two (2) parcels
of land into one (1) parcel, and to then subdivide said parcel
into three (3) parcels, on the property described as follows:
"Commencing at the SE corner of the E1/2 of the NE1/4 of 5-32-24,
thence North along the East line of said E1/2 of NE1/4 of Sec. 5
660' to the point of beginning of the tract herein to be
described, thence West and parallel with the South line of the
E1/2 of NE1/4 660', thence North and parallel with the East line
of the E1/2 of NE1/4 312', thence East and parallel with the
South line of the E1/2 of the NE 1/4 660' to the East line of
said E1/2 of the NE1/4 of Sec. 5, thence South along the East
line 312' to the point of beginning, subject to County Road 9 as
now laid out and traveled, Sec. 5-32-24 (PIN 5-32-24-14-0002)"
and "That part of the East 660' of the SE1/4 of NE1/4 of 5-32-24,
Anoka County, MN lying South of the North 110' thereof and lying
North of the South 560' of said SE1/4 of NE1/4 and the North 110'
of SE1/4 of NE1/4 of Sec. 5-32-24, Anoka County, MN (except the
North 29.7' as measured along the East and West lines of said
SE1/4 of NE 1/4) (except that part described as follows:
commencing at the SE corner of the E1/2 of NE1/4 of Sec. 5-32-24,
thence North along the East line of said E1/2 of NE1/4 of Sec. 5
660' to the point of beginning of the tract herein to be
described, thence West and parallel with the South line of the
E1/2 of NE1/4 660', thence North and parallel with the East line
of the E1/2 of NE1/4 312', thence East and parallel with the
South line of the E1/2 of NE1/4 660' to the East line of said
E1/2 of NE1/4 of Sec. 5, thence South along the East line 312' to
the point of beginning (PIN 5-32-24-14-0003)", and
WHEREAS, after such review by the Planning & zoning
Commission and after consideration of additional information
received from the Assistant Engineer, and
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission forwarded on to the
City Council its recommendation to deny said lot split request
as detailed in the Commission minutes dated October 24, 1989,
and
WHEREAS, the City Council is not in agreement with the
recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission,
o
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to approve
the lot split request as presented, with the following
conditions:
o
o
Page Two
Res. No. R -89
Larry and Catherine Lunday Lot split Request
1. That Tract A as shown on the survey dated October 3, 1989, be
Gombined with Lot 3, Block 1, Njordmark Dale, and that a new
legal description and evidence of said combination be
provided to the City by the applicant; and
2. That Tract C as newly created containing two and one-half (2
1/2 a.) acres and having dimensions of 350' x 312' be allowed
to front onto Round Lake Boulevard until such time as 179th
Avenue and Narcissus streets are constructed; and
3. That at such Time as Tract B is further subdivided, Narcissus
Street and 179th Avenue would be constructed and that Tract C
and any additional parcel created would front on said
interior streets; and
4. That the construction of Narcissus Street and 179th Avenue
would not be required to be completed at this time but that
the extension of said streets should be considered in the
location of any structures thereon; and
5. That the applicant pay the appropriate Park Dedication Fees
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of December, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E.Elling, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n~""9Il1P9r Ii. 19119
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROtr ED .FOR
AGE~ A
I
I/~
1\Tnn_ni . nn
Engineering
ITEM
NO. 13. Final Payment/
88-35
BY:
'" C!....h...",.,+-~
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
the work and directing final payment for Project 88-35, trunk
watermain from Tower 2 to 150th Lane and Hanson Boulevard.
Moser Contracting Company is the contractor.
Enclosures: TKDA Recommendation Letter
Resolution
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
NOV 29 '89 08:37
T K D A & ASSOC., INC.
r'.C:
KDA
November 28, 1989
TOlTZ. KIN Ill. DUV,",Ll. ANDiR.ON
AND AeaOOIATell. INOORPOFlATiD
dOl> AMlAIOAN NATIONAL IlIoNK IUILDING
'AINT PAUl., MINNS80TA UtD!
11 lIma_
~AX Ilmt.QOU
GINEER$ AROHITECTS PLANNIRS
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover. Minnesota
Re: Trunk Watennain COMeotion to Tank No.2
Project 88-35
Andover, Minnesota
COnmUssion No. 9368
Dear Mayor and Council:
Moser Construction Company has completed work on the above referenced project and we
recommend fmal payment. The final contract cost is $1,586.40 less than the original contract
cost, due mainly to the deletion of a 16" butterfly valve that was added to PDM's oontract for
Water Storage Tank No.2.
We recoIt11nend final payment to Moser Construction Company in the amount of $1,320.64.
JPR:j
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
MOSER CONSTRUCTION FOR
TOWER WATERMAIN IN THE
HANSON BOULEVARD.
to adopt the following:
WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO
PROJECT NO. 88-35 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
FOLLOWING AREA: TOWER #2 TO 150TH LANE &
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of
Andover on August 1, 1989, Moser Construction of Minneapolis, MN has
satisfactorily completed the construction in accordance with such
contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover,
Minnesota. The work completed under said contract is hereby
accepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby
directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such
contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a Regular Meeting this 5th day of December, 1989,
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE n"'..."'m~9"!ii, 19S9
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
FOR
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
14. Final Payment/88-1 /
BY:
Red Oaks 5th
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
the work and directing final payment for Project 88-17, Red Oaks
5th Addition for improvements of watermain, sanitary sewer, storm
drain and streets.
Note in TKDA's letter the increased cost due to paving before last
winter and the second course this summer.
American Contracting is the contractor.
Enclosures: TKDA Letter of Recommendation
Resolution
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
o TO
NOV 29 '89 08:38
T K D A & ASSOC., iNC.
P.3
KDA
November 28,1989
TO~TZ, KING. DUVALL, ANDIRSON
AND AIlIlOOIATU, INOOAPOAATID
1100 AMill10AN NATIOIlAL SANK IUILDINQ
'AlNT PAUL. MINN.lIOTA 55101
G121R"..woo
~AX etml.OQM
6NOINEE!RS ARCHlitiOTS PLANNERS
Honorable Mayor and Ory Council
~dover,~lesota
Re: Red Oaks Manor 5th Addition
Project 88~ 17
~dover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9274~03
Dear Mayor and Council:
American Contracting, Inc.. has completed work on the above referenced project and we
reconunend (mal payment. American Contracting also completed sanitary sewer and watennain
connections to Lot lO, Block 4 of Oak Bluff which was assessed as part of City Project 88-12.
The final contract cost was approximately $2,700, or 1.3%, over the original contract cost due to
the addition of a second course of bituminous, added at the developer's request, to allow
construction of homes through last winter.
We reconunend final payment to American Contracting, Inc.. in the .amount of $38.172.62.
JPR:j
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO
AMERICAN CONTRACTING FOR PROJECT NO. 88-17 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER & STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION IN THE
FOLLOWING AREA: RED OAKS 5TH ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of
Andover on August 16, 1988, American Contracting of Coon Rapids, MN
has satisfactorily completed the construction in accordance with
such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover,
Minnesota. The work completed under said contract is hereby
accepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby
directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such
contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a Regular Meeting this 5th day of December, 1989,
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk -City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Bee~Lb.~ S, 1989
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
15. Declare costs 88-8
88-17
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
the cost and directing the preparation of assessment roll for
Project 88-8, Old Colony Estates and for project 88-17, Red Oaks
5th Addition.
I believe the developers will waive the assessment hearing.
The roll will be on the 19th of December to order the assessment
hearing if necessary.
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
o
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN,
AND STREETS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-8, OLD COLONY ESTATES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$233,888.22, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $63,033.00 and work previously done
amount to $201,388.66 so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $498,309.88.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $18,302.33 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $480,007.55.
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
c:> ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
o
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN,
AND STREETS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-17, RED OAKS 5TH ADDITION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$222,533.84, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $63,790.16 and work previously done
amount to $11,085.00 so that the total cost of the improvement will be
$297,409.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $297,409.00.
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 7.76 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
c:> ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
RED OAKS MANOR 5TH ADDITION
PROJECTS 88-17
COMMISSION NO. 9274
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
o
OLD COLONY ESTATES
PROJECTS 88-8
COMMISSION NO. 9218
Feasibility
Report
Final
Cost
%
Change
PER LOT ASSESSMENT
Lateral Assessments
Sanitaty Sewer (w/o Trunk Benefit) $1,354.30 $1,110.54
Watermain (w/o Trunk Benefit) 1 ,279.47 1,056.57
Storm Sewer 703.40 992.37
Street and Restoration 2.412;35 1.906.32
Subtotal $5,749.52 $5,065.80
Trunk Assessments
Sanitaty Sewer: Connection $211.15 $221.50
Sanitaty Sewer: Lateral 761.79 894.00
Watermain: Connection 970.00 990.00
Watermain: Lateral 761.79 894.00
Storm Sewer: Area (87-11 B) 822.00 662.11
Subtotal $3,526.73 $3,661.61
TOTAL ASSESSMENT PER LOT $9,276.25 $8,724.41
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Construction Cost $261,340.00 $233,888.22
Expenses 78,400.00 63,033.00
Trunk Source and Storage 148,760.15 164,972.50
Trunk Storm Sewer 187-11B\ 45.210.00 36416.16
Total Cost of Improvement $53_?,710.15 $498,309.88
City Share (Trunk Storm SewerlTretlel Lot) 26.507.98 18.302.33
Total Assessment to Bent Creek Estates $507,202.17 $480,007.55
0 ASSESSMENT ROLLS
10 Year@ 7.76%
Equal Payment
(-13.6%)
(+3.8%)
(-6.3%)
(-7.1%)
(-5.7%)
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE December~. 1qAq
ITEM
NO. 16. Final Payment/
89-4
BY:
JO' -.
APPRO.t..~ E~ FOR
AGE~
BY: 'It
i/
I. AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
"T~~ ...~ C!~..~~~ ~~ T"~_~
Engineering
The city Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
work and directing final payment for project 89-4, Red Oaks 6th
Addition for improvements of watermain, sanitary sewer, storm
drain and streets.
Note in TKDA's letter the decrease in cost due to the developer
completing some of the restoration.
Enclosures: TKDA Recommendation Letter
Resolution
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
p, J.J n {.JI; rl~Q'~-.' .Il~.
TOl TZ. KIN<!I. DUVALl.. ANDIFlSON
AND AaIlOOIAna. INOOFlPOFlAt!tl
ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
II\lIl AAliRIOAN NATIONAL eANK BUILOINa
$AINT PAUl., MINNIIOTA 55101
&1t/1lit.44llO
FAX <Ja02000U
November 28,1989
Honorable Mayor and City Co,moil
~dover,~U1esota
R.e: Red Oaks Manor 6th Addition
Project 89-4
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9432
Dear Mayor and Council:
W.B. Miller, Inc., has completed work on the above referenced project and we recommend final.
payment. The final contract cost was $9,772.34Iesll than the original contract cost, mamly due
to the developer completing the restoration. We recomnlend rmal payment to W.B. Miller, Inc..
in the amount of $6,720.10.
JPR:j
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO W.B.
MILLER, INC. FOR PROJECT NO. 89-4 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN,
SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN & STREETS IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: RED
OAKS 6TH ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of
Andover on May 2, 1989, W.B. Miller of Ramsey, MN has satisfactorily
completed the construction in accordance with such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover,
Minnesota. The work completed under said contract is hereby
accepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City
directed to issue a proper order for the
contract, taking the contractor's receipt
Clerk and Mayor are hereby
final payment on such
in full.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a Regular Meeting this 5th day of December, 1989,
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk -City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Engineering
DATE np.r.p.mhpr ~ 1QAQ
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO. 17. Approve CCO/88-9/
Tuli Street
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the change order for
Project 88-9, Tulip street ponding and Project 88-10, university
Avenue street Construction.
Project 88-9
At the August 1st City Council meeting the Council approved the
acquisition of right-of-way plus the estimated cost to do the
necessary grading for shaping the pond.
The attached change order has a cost of $5725 for the pond. This
is an MSA project and the funds are to come from the city's MSA
account that Andover has. We acquired easements rather than fee
title as state aid required. It was decided to use the local
funds and acquire an easement as the property owner preferred.
Project 88-10
The change order is for trash guards and traffic signs. These
items are MSA eligible. The plans didn't include trash guards and
some additional signing that is required.
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
~Il~ Bonestroo
~ Rosene
U Anderlik &
1 \J 1 Associates
Engineers & Architects
Ono G. Bonescroo, P.E.
Robert W. Rosene. P.E.
Joseph C. AnderJik, P.E.
Richard E. Turner, P,E.
James C. Olson, P.E.
Glenn R. Cook. P.E.
Thomas E. NOyeS. P.E.
Robert Q. $chunicht, P.E.
MalVin L Sorvala, P.E.
Keith A. Gordon, P,E.
Richard W. Foster. P.E.
Donald C. Burgardt. P.E.
Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E.
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Ted K. Field, P.E.
Michael T. Rautmann, P.E.
Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E.
David Q. Loskota, P.E.
Thomas W. Peterson. P.E.
Michael C. lynch. P.E.
James R. Maland, P.E.
Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E.
Mark R. Rolfs, RE.
Robert C. Russek, A.l.A.
Thomas E. Angus. P.E.
Howard A. Sanford. P.E.
Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E.
Mark A. Seip. P.E.
Philip J. Caswell. P.E.
Mark D. Wallis. P.E.
Thomas R. Anderson, A.I.A.
Gary F. Rylander, p.E.
Miles 8. Jensen, P.E.
L Phfllip Gravel ut, P.E.
Chanes A. Erickson
Leo M. pawelsky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A.
November 16, 1989
He"
"
,.
E ".,.. - -, "" ... ...-,
..5..il1UliaIU
-.Ub.~.~ i!.1
;\iO\/ 2 2 19~91:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Anoka, MN 55303
CITY OF A!'.IDOVER
Re: Tulip Street NW 88-9
MSAP No. 198-105-02
University Avenue NW 88-10
MSAP Nos. 198-114-01 & 197-114-01
Our File No. 17132
Dear Mayor and Council:
Enclosed please find Change Order No. 2 on the Tulip Street and University
Avenue M.S.A. project. The change order provides for the excavation of a
ponding area on the Mucciacciarro property, trash guards and traffic signs.
The pond on the Mucciacciarro property was necessary to provide storage for
storm water drained from Tulip Street NW. The pond is located in a natural
basin that has always provided storage for a ten acre drainage area. The
excavation of the pond was necessary to store the additional runoff that
results from paving the street. The pond will not solve the problems of the
watershed as development continues. It is anticipated that a storm sewer
outfall line will be necessary at some time to provide adequate drainage in
the watershed.
In discussions with Jim Schrantz and Frank Stone, it became apparent to us
that the City of Andover requires all storm sewer aprons, larger than 12
inches in diameter, to have galvanized trash guards. It was also determined
that the existing traffic signing on the two streets was not adequate. These
two items were not recognized on the plans and had to be provided for with the
change order.
I would be pleased to provide any additional information needed to explain the
change order. In all future plans, the propcsal will include trash guards and
any necessary traffic signs.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-~~
Shawn Gustafson
SG:li
o
Page 2.
29
2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 · 612-636-4600
<..l
:!:
:!
'"
'"
"'"
0 .. ~
I .. ""::;
1I ~~;
"" l!:~j_
'0 ::i'l'
---., ~
- I . ~i'5J ~
...
;.; X;:: !::..
] ~~~ ,~
oa <II ~ " '"'>
.... I I ~- \(
( /Or>'-I2. ~
I
PvC@ '"
I ...
'.Z:S"/. ~
'"
o
II
:1
II
:1
:1"
!I /0'.
,..-
"
:1
'I
I
II
_ _ ..... OPTION 3 .
,r ..........
/ ....."
/ ----....... "
( --....""
I ,
\ ,
I
UI
~'"
~I
&:1
.I
\3
i
'"
I
I
I
c}J.
I
I
I
I
ELEVATION APP~O".:
o
15'"51 VINTI\c.E
I"\tlC,c.lI\c..c.'Al\O
... .- ----.--- - .. -." - -.----
'" ....----... .
CHANGE ORDER
DATE:
^"CE:
"OJECT:
PROJECT NO.:
CONTRACTOR:
CHANGE ORDER NO.:
November 16, 1989
Andover, Minnesota FILE NO: 17132
Tulip Street N.W., University Avenue N.W.
88-9, 88-10
Dresel Contracting, Inc., 21490 Forest Blvd. N., Forest Lake, MN 55025
2
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
This Change Order provides for the construction of a pond approximately 350' west of STA.
15+30 on Tulip Street N.W. Galvanized trash guards were included to improve water quality
and increase safety on storm sewer aprons. Additional traffic signs were needed to
adequately inform motorists using the two streets.
Change Order Item
Unit
Unit
Price
Est'd
Quantity
Total
Amount
PART I - TULIP STREET N.W. - MSAP 198-105-02
2105.501 Common Excavation (Pond) C.Y. $3.50 1000 $3,500.00
2511.501 Random Rip Rap, CL. III C.Y. 75.00 S 600.00
2511.515 Geotexti1e Filter, Type III S.Y. 3.00 24 72.00
0564.602 Traffic Signs w/Post (R2-1, Speed Limit 30) Each 110.00 2 220.00
0564.602 Traffic Signs with Post (Stop Ahead) Each 110.00 1 110.00
2575.501 Seeding Acre 224.00 0.5 112.00
2575.502 Seed Mixture 600 Lbs. 4.00 30 120.00
2575.505 Sod S.Y. 2.00 350 700.00
2575.511 Mulch Material, Type I Ton 200.00 1.0 200.00
2575.519 Disc Anchoring Acre 62.00 0.5 31. 00
2575.531 Commercial Fertilizer Analysis 12-12-12 Ton 600.00 0.1 60.00
TOTAL PART I - TULIP STREET N.W. $5,725.00
PART II - UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.W. - MSAP 19S-114-01 & 197-114-01
2501. 602 Galv. Trash Guard for lS" Pipe Apron Each $375.00 1 $375.00
2501.602 Galv. Trash Guard for 36" Pipe Apron Each 1,250.00 2 2,500.00
0564.602 Traffic Signs w/Post (WS-3, Pavement Ends) Each 110.00 1 110.00
0564.602 Traffic Signs w/Post (R2-1, Speed Limit 35) Each 110.00 2 220.00
0564.602 Traffic Signs w/Post (Stop Ahead) Each 110.00 1 110.00
0564.602 Traffic Signs w/Post (lS"x lS" reflector) Each 110.00 2 220.00
TOTAL PART II - UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.W. $3,535.00
o
CHANGE ORDER
DATE:
gCE:
JECT:
PROJECT NO.:
CONTRACTOR:
CHANGE ORDER NO.:
November 16, 1989
Andover, Minnesota FILE NO: 17132
Tulip Street N.Y., University Avenue N.Y.
88-9, 88-10
Dresel Contracting, Inc., 21490 Forest Blvd. N., Forest Lake, MN 55025
2
TOTAL PART I - ADD
TOTAL PART II -ADD
$5,725.00
3,535.00
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - ADD
$9,260.00
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS
THIS CHANGE ORDER ~O. 2 - ADD
$322,962.00
21,753.50
9,260.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
$353,975.50
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK &
~. . ASSOCIATES,
By JJ4-~~
INC.
Approved by: Dresel Contracting, Inc.
By ~ J~I~
Approved by: City of Andover, Minnesota
By
, Clerk
Distribution
1 - City .
2 - Contractor
1 - Engineer
By
, Mayor
Date:
o
, .
"--.
RegulaC"
O Minutes
Page 6
City Council Meeting
- August 1, 1989
~ <R. Sonsteby SeweC" Request, Continued)
CouncllmembeC" OC"ttel explained the
at the time the Plan was done, the
City's population would not gC"ow.
of noC"mal gC"owth because In effect
MetC"opolltan Council did.
C"eason foC" the amendments is that
Metropolitan Council insisted the
The Plan has been amended because
the City didn't do the Plan, the
Mr. Blake noted Mr. Hay and Ms. Sonsteby have negotiated an easement
fC"om the existing sewer and wateC" lines to the Hay property. The
Metropolitan Council has urged him to include that the property on
either side of the easement in the amendment to provide sewer to the
Hay pC"operty. .
Council noted that would then almost double the capacity of the sewer
line and that hasn't been contemplated by the City. AttoC"ney Hawkins
advised that the City Is not under any court order to include the
pC"opeC"ty on either side of the easement, only the Hay property.
The Council then directed Mr. Blake to submit the Comprehensive Plan
amendment without the easement area, only foC" the property included in
the court order.
Mr. Haas didn't think all of Ms. Sonsteby/s property could be served
by gravity through the Coon Rapids interceptor. The Council noted the
CAB lift station in Anoka is being designed to include this area and
all of the CAB area designated in the Comprehensive Plan, again noting
the lift station should be completed in late 1990 or 1991. It was ~
generally agreed that the property should remain in the CAB area untii
it can be studied further as a part of the Comprehensive Plan update.
Also, the Staff should continue to work on the request to serve this
property through Anoka.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Knight, that the Andover City Council
request that the Sonsteby property be served by the CAB interceptor as
per the Comprehensive Plan of 1982, and that as part of the
Comprehensive Plan update that that area be studied to determine if in
fact the CAB interceptor is still the most appropriate method for
serving the area. Motion carried unanimously.
V STORM DRAINAGE/TULIP STREET'
Mr. Schrantz asked the Council to approve the ~cquisition of an
easement for storm dC"ainage foC" Tulip StC"eet,PC"oJect 88-9. The
costs aC"e $2,500 for the Mucci~cciaC"o property and $600 for the
Houle property plus $3,500 for shaping the pond.
o
MOTION by OC"ttel, Seconded by Perry, that the Council authorize the
purchase of drainage easements and final construcion of the dC"ainage
pond for the Tulip StC"eet PC"oJect 88-9 for a cost of approximately
$6,600. Motion carried unanimously.