The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC November 21, 1989 ** REVISED ** DATE: November 2l, 1989 o ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL What's Haooeninq Regular City Council Minutes (11-1-89) Minnesota Association of Small Cities Letter from Regional Transit Board Park Board Minutes (ll-2-89) Letter Hidden Creek East Second Letter from Good Value Homes Letter from SecC)nd Addi tion- Building Reoort for October 1989 Letter from Karla R. wahl, P.A. (Bruce Hay) Letter from Bill Hawkins to Karla Wahl (11/16/89) Letter from Karla Wahl to Bill Hawkins (11/20/89) PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. THANK YOU. o '.--.~..'.~'.?;~l'.m'i'~~' o o ..... -r-----''' o Law Offices ~ ~ Cffa/4 9s:ff CL ~ e Ie ~L2 M~ 1/ /ZI ~OV~21-89 TUE 12:04 Karla R, Wahl Bridget White l.cg:tl Asslst.me 4717 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 330-3040 FAX (612) 330-3060 November 20. 1989 William Hawkins, Esq. City Attorney , City of Andover 299 N.W. Coon Rapids Boulevard , Coon Rapids, Minnesota' 55433 . Re: Bruce B. Hay Request for Sewer Service Dear Mr. Hawkins: It is my understanding that the City's staff wishes to have additional time to review the recommendations of tbe Metropolitan Council. Consequently. attendance at the City Council meeting on November 21, 1989. would be fruitless. Therefore.' this letter is to advise you that Bruce B. Hay wishes to have the modification of the City of Andover's Comprehensive Plan Amendment scheduled fot a hearing before the City Council of the City of Andover on Tuesday, December 5, 1989. The Citv of Andover and individual council members have en!!:a!!:ed in willful conduct violative of the court order. This conduct includes:, ~ ~ o (1) Advising ~et Council staff that the, Comprehensive, Plan _____ ,__ _ Amendment submitted by the City of Andover which was ambiguous as to the site area pertained only to the Hay property and not to the contiguous section of the Sonstebe property necessary to comply with Met ,Council policies. The City of Andover knew that the Met Council would not approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment unless the Amendment was for a contiguous area. Consequently. the City of .A..'1dover has knowingly caused a delay in t.~e development of the Hay project. (2) Submitting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to tbe Metropolitan 'Council which contained undocumented, suhjective reasons for why the Met Council should deny the Plan Amendment rather than approve it. NOV-21-89 TUE 12:05 - , , P.03 ,. o William Hawkins, Esq. Page Two November 20, 1989 (3) Speaking against the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. "- All of t...iese actions have been done by the City and individual council members in contempt of the court, order and in a manner flagrantly opposed to the spirit and direction of the court order. Sincerely, <;fz-c/'.A.1~.tdj/tf' Karla R. Wahl KRW:brh cc: Bruce B. Hay John Johnson, Merilla & A"sociates o NOV-20~89 MON 10:16 LAW Ol'rn:E& 01' .' C 70 C" I!ZI/?y o Rurke and Jlawkins SUITE 101 2110 COON ItAl'lOS IOULEV"ltO COON ,...."'DI. MINNESOTA lSlI433 I'HONI 111111 71"'2"S JOHN ;.., !IUIIKE Wtl.LIAM (i, H"WKINS November fl, 19B9 Ms. Karla R. Wahl Attorney at Law 4717 IDS Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 I Re: City o~ Andover - Bruce ,8. Hay Dear Ms. wahl. 1 have reviewed your letter of November 10, 19B9 and disagree with your conolusion that the City has failed to comply with the Court Order. The City approved the extension of sewer to yourolient's prop- erty and submitted a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to aocomplish this extension. The Metro Council staff recommended denial based upon their policies and goalS. I do not believe the City is under any legal obligation to request amendment of its Comprehensive Plan to properties out- side of those covered by the Special Use Permit. Furthermore the'criteria set but 1n the recommendations would require sub- stantial policy changes which affeot the entire City. I do not believe that the tourt of Appeals decision required the City to abrogate its entire planning responsibilities for the City in order to _ccomplish the sewer e~tension to your client's property. . In conclusion, the City believes it has fulfilled its obliga- tions to "make sewer available- to your client's property. Accordingly we have no plans to make any additional modification at this time to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment submitted to the ,Metropolitan Council. o G. Hawkins City Attorney WGB:mk P.02 i::~ 'T'"'~;'!<' IlVV c.J. 0;; J.~IC.""" I ~ ~ n ~ n~~U~~"~11~1 , ,.... 'ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE MEm'ING ///d//5r9 ,- . , , . . AGENDA ITEM '$ . /0" . ProJect' 8tJ'T:Jottrl'L ~""~~~ --eiI'U- t&rJb, l't-o.H:.'"(.." 80j ~ Z.L_. Comm.No. MAO OLoeett on AfoJ1:JoJG'2. MN By .li~' ,Str..t.I"Sw'f'Ol' A"IT 's.. "'~lUI,~ ST. . .Oett!l. 'II 'Zol JS~ . :E&trmat. for ~""'i.' l... "'P&"'l~-IC....7ioo.rs '.Sn"+~of-L- o . .' '. ITEM ., '. '. . . DESCRIPTION ,.,QUANTITY ,.. , ..' 'Ho.'. '. 'UNIT.' "TOTAL: . '.. . . , . : I l"'Io'l\(..c ~A"o~ . .' '. \. . -:.' ..'. 4- . . , '-)0 4. .;1:lO . % 5'00 ,... 2. . . 1.. r..-utlSoING- C.t~. ' ....' .~~o,.:' GL.f:~foic.. A<.. ~ 000- ~ 177, ~f'e>1r.A1I' 'c.._' '":D: Il. S"/ ., , "COo,! .. 50- -4 1r..,.,.;;....._1 u'; 'F,r.T6!2. ~1J!.1c.., "/"fDl". . ~ 'l~'~ .. 12. ">"'i \zo- es- . ~'b F.lc........',<:lo.,..ION (e.V \ .8o,tll"l c.-J . 1~ 2.0 A1Co.: h I U.... ,. ~;s.. F'i,.";""M'li,b Jk~-.:itt^(... >(1(100 C:"I~ !9 I' 000 . . , '"'1 i~e~", Goo .J,s- .~ '. , Ji;;Q;. -- :' , !Ie. fit . , . .... s.e~. fl'l, ll~', ~'K t;'OO , .,~ ~iS 1.'- , . ,,!10,- '" Fa "'il ~I ~<! 1%.. ..,';0 , ~ Z2.o!;- "l!~ 10 .. " &-dJ - (\"Iv <"(;.\01' 3 "T'l>.l.s 2,00'" . .. , I " .. . .' .. -T--. ~~ .C-......-, Co..,. , :.~ 2'1'I?"C:; ~ ;', , " "", " '.. '.. . . .' ,. " '. ..; '.' .' .. ,_.0 "~es AebSe ,. . . - . lm-lL ~.:... ','~-':"~ ~.r~ , !I 1zCYJo'l& , i 'W ;,.,"'~ oJ c.-.~, ~p.c.- "2..,.., !1.. ,_. NT !u,j/;O!! ~~ 'Zo:....,\~..L~ t::- ee ",,~l~~ bill,. j7",(U.. k "'~ Ii 10 _ i50~ , . , NOV 21 '89 i5: 24 T K D A & ASSOC" HIC. P.i o -=d~/g9 . , /0 o o o DATE: November 21, 1989 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL What's Haooeninq Regular City Council Minutes (ll-7-89) Minnesota Association of Small Cities Letter from Regional Transit Board Park Board Minutes (ll-2-89) Letter from Good Value Homes Hidden Creek East Second ,Homes' - Hidden Addi ti on' Letter from TKDA Building Reoort for October 1989 Letter from Karla R. Wahl, P.A. (Bruce Hay) PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT .~GENDA. THANK YOU. o o **************************************************************** ~olC************************************************************~... olColC ...... olC ...... olColC ...... olColC ...... olColC ...... olColC ...... :: __WHAI~_S__HAPPENING 1_ :: olColC ...... olColC ~...... :: ',\:: olColC '...... olColC ...... olColC ...... :: November 21, 1989 :: olColC ...... olColC ...... olColC ...... olColC ...... olColC ...... olColC ~ Attached is a survey that went to all AMM member ...* :: communities (Andover is not a me~ber) requesting :: olColC input on the Metropolitan Local Water Management ...... :: Task Force Assignment in Subdivision 1 of :: olColC Article 9. ...... olColC ...... ~ ...... :: This is the Greg Dahl bill that was passed by :: olColC the Legislators as a result of all the problems ...... olColC ...... olColC that the Coon Creek Watershed was having. ...... olColC ...... olColC ...* olColC Andover's input is important as many of the AMM ...* :: member cities never heard of Chapter 106A and :: olColC had been operating under Chapter 112 until 509 ...... :: legislation took effect in the metro area only. :: olColC ...... :: The Council may wish this to be a Council item. :: olColC ...... ~ ~ olColC ...... :: ~ Included in the packet is a memo from Charlie :: :~ Weaver, Coon Rapids/Andover legal consultant on ~: olC; Si te "Q". ;... olColC ...... ~ ~ olColC The Metro Council will be paying for staff time ...... :: as well as certain consultant time that the City:: :: needs to spend reviewing the EIS, etc. part of :: olColC the siting process. ...... olColC ...... olColC ...... olColC Charlie recommends in his memo that Andover/Coon ...... :: Rapids contract with various experts to review:: :: the reports, etc. :: olColC ...... :: I will have an agenda item on the December, 5th :: olColC meeting recommending the hiring of consultants ...... :: and a proposed joint power agreement between the :: olColC two ci ties. ...... olColC ...... ~ ~ olColC ...... olColC ...... olColC ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ olColC ...... ~. ... olColC************************************************************~... ................................................................ - . City of Maole Grove ..t. 9401 Fernbrook Lane, ~Iaple Grove, Minnesota 55369-9790 PAID AUG 1 0 ~~8~ Per.............., 612-420-4000 August 9, 1989 To: All AMM Mayors, Managers/Administrators Public Works Directors City Engineers Subject: Metropolitan Local Water Management Task Force ALERT! LEGISLATIVE ACTION PROBABLE ON WATERSHED MANAGEMENT I have been appointed the AMM representative to serve on the Legislative mandated Metropolitan Local Water Management Task Force. What is the Metropolitan Local Water Management Task Force? Legislators mandated the Task Force in 1989 after receiving complaints about the complexity of water management laws (i.e., Chapter 106A, Chapter 112, Chapter 509) and the fact that maybe the legislative intent of 509 is not happening. By December 15, 1989, the Task Force needs to study and prepare a report to the Legislature on issues identified in Article 9 attached hereto. Your IMMEDIATE INPUT is needed so I can best represent AMM members. Please respond to the attached questionnaire immediately. Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks. Sincerely, h ~ ." ,~~.-&....u7 v::r;.::u-~ Gerald 8?1Butcher, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Maple Grove o GEB:cw Ene 1 os-ure "Serving '~()(.iay. Shaping '1bmoITow" . ~. i \ , .:- ( \lillhll:nl':,::'V:" . ,I:;'. \!d:CiiJi't"t" DonaldJ. lClln~tad { illlill'jlnH....lilhtT Donna R\'on {.tHII1I..:llllll..inhl."r .1.1U1l~'" Ih"~:Ill." D~l\"id Burtlh:!'o" (.harll.... F. lkhn o o PAID AUG 1 0 F\!:\ AMM SURVEY FOR LEGISLATIVE TASK FORCE p~,. City 1. Do you have problems with current water management laws? i.e., 509 Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act Chapter 112 - Minnesota Watershed Act Chapter 106A - County Drainage Systems Chapter 40 - Minnesota Soil & Water Conservation Act If so, what? (Be as specific as you can.) 2. Do you have suggestions for correction or needed additions/deletions? If so, what? o o ", 3. PAID AUG 1 0 1c,~q A number of agencies/individuals think somebody should oversee and ~p'prove "1 oca 1 water management plans" (under current 1 aw, 1 oca 1 plan on 1y ne~~ds..t1i'''''' be approved by the Water Management Organization). Indicate whether you think there should be an overview agency or not and indicate your preference of agency if one was legislated. No overview required beyond WMO or Overview in addition to WMO If overview mandated, indicate first and second choice. Board of Water and Soil Resources Metropolitan Council Department of Natural Resources Pollution Control Agency Other (Note: The Board of Water and Soil Resources is the review agency for Watershed Management Plans. .- '< o ARTICLE 9 WATERSHED DISTRICTS Section 1, [METROPOLITAN LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE,] Subdivisian ], [ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE,] (a) A m~lrapal. ilan local wala manag~m~nllaskJorc~ is ~stablish~d to sludy and pr~par~ a r~porl on Ih~ following issu~s: (J) how 10 accomplish consrructiv~ public participalion in and local coordination of local water mnnag(m~lll: (2) how 10 avaid <xc~ssiv. public COSIS associaud wilh Ih~ planning and imp/~m~nlalian oj capilal irnpro"(ln~nt proj~Cls: (J) 1Vh~lha ad~qllal' ovasight ~.tisls of local "'ala manag~mml aCliv- ;eits to assure adherence /0 stQU law alld approved h'nttrshed management plans; (4) the proctdur~s /0 bl! u.ud in urbanizing areas /0 mainli;Iin, repair. improv~. con.'itruct. and abandon public drainage sysum'!; (5) Ilu appropriau m'lltnds for finallcing capital imprav~m<nt projuts; (6) wlt~llta local wala manag~m~nl/~vi" and bands should b~ t:umpl fram I~vy limits and caps on Mr ind~budn~ss: (7) ",helhtr rhe metropolitan "'aUr mnnagttntnt acl has met its original expectations: and (8) wltal cltang" ar~ nud~d in Slal~ law or 11o~ SlruClur~ oj local wOlush~d management organizatiotls to achit\'e greater consistency and slability in ml!lropo/ilan waurshed management organizations. (b) TIo~ lask forc~ shall oIul a chair 01 ils Jirst m~~ting, (c) TIo~ laskJoree shall b~ giv.n I~gal and uchnicol SlaJJsupporl by Ih~ board of waler and soil resources. The board of WQur and soil resources shall provid~ administrative support, . Subd, 2, [MEMBERSHIP.] TIr~ laskJore< shal/ consisl oj: (I) Ihra m~mbus oj Ih~ unau appoinr~d by 11t~ majorily I~adu; (2) Ihra membcrs oJrh~ house oJrcpreutllalil'(S appoinud by Ih~ sp.aku; (3) 11r~ clrair and Iwo addiliatlal m~mbers oJlh~ board oJwalu and soil r~soure<s appoinud by lh~ chair; (4) the state planning commissioner or the commissioners designee: (5) the commissioner of the department of natural r~SOllrces or the commissioner's designee: (6) Ih~ commissiol1u oj Ih~ pol/uliotl conlrol og"ICY or Ihe commis- sioner's designee; (7) tlr~ chair oj Ih~ lII~lropolitan councilor 110. chairs duignu: (8) a m~mbu OJIIt. assacialion oJm'lrOpOlilan municipaliliu appoinud by the chair oJ the board of water and soil resourceS: (9) 0 m~mbu oJrh~ Minn~sota associalion oJ'K'aursh~d diSlricls appoinl~d by 11r~ clrair oj Ih~ board of waru and soil resouras; (10) a m~mbu oj Ih~ ossocimiotl oj Mitltlesolll soil a1l</\I'mu COtlS"'- \'alion dislricls oppoitlted by 11r~ ch"ir oj Ih~ board oj \I''''er a1l<1 soil resources; (1 J) a member representing watershed mtlllogement organizatiuns appointed by the chair of the board of \Vater llnd suil n.'sources: (12) a member of the association of IWi/IIll'SUW cOllnties (lppoilllecl by ;ilt chair oj liu bOllra of waler (Jllll soii resvurn:s; (1 J) a member of the metropolitan ;n[(.or-colfllty association t.lppoilJIecl by Ih~ chair oj Ih~ board oj \l'orer ,,"d soil resollras; (14) a member representing cVlUlllling ensi/leers llppoillUd by the chair oj Ih~ board 'oj WOler atld soil r(>'oll'CCS; (15) a member represellling the re;m'est in ^,1itltl~sulll cOlllirioll uppoitlud by (h~ chair of rhe board of \Vater alld soil USOII"C~S; (lIJd (/6) a resident of tire slutt illler~J/ed ill melropuliwn I\'Ul('r IIIwwgel1lt:/Il issues appoi1lttd by tht cJl(lir vi rlt~ buurd uf Water ami Joil r~~.Ullrres, Subd, 3, {REPORT, J TI.. task Jura shal/ l'''l'u" a ",'ort alld submil il to the go'V~rnor and the l~giS[Cllllr~ by D~c~lIIber 15, 1989. o PAID t\UG 1 0 1SJ~ Per .........____ 'iD ...I....r""~s ~. \.....RKII'.I ROBERT 1... I-lOF'IO'MAN ..:ACK ~. OA\..Y O. KENNETH LINDGREN WENOELL.. R. ANDERSON GERAI..O H. F'RIEOE::L.l.. ALl.AN E. MUl..l..lGAN _seRT .J. Hl;;.N"lESSEY E5 Co E:RICKSON ARO..J. DRISCOL.L. e:S P. Mll..EY ENE N. F'W!.!..!!:R OAVIO C. SEl.l.ERGREN RICI-I...RD..I. IoI;EENAN ...IOMN 0. FULL.MER ROBE:RT ~ eOYl..E: "'RANK I. HARVEY CHARLES S. MODELL CI-tRI5TOl"MER oJ. OIET<:e::"l JOHN R. BEATTIE LINDA I-t, FISHER THOMAS P. STOL.TMAN STEVEN Q. LEVI'" Il'ORREST O. NOWI.IN MICHAeL C. .JACKMAN ..JOHN E. CIEHl. ,JON S. SW1EAZE:WSKI THOMAS J. FI.VNN .JAMes I'>.OUINN TOOO I. FREEMAN STEPHEN e. SOLOMON PETER l'l. SECK ..:EROME: H. o'l;AHNKE SHERRILL OMAN KUFU:T1CH as;:FlA,I..O l.. SECK ~OI-tN B. LUNOQUIST OAYL.E NOI.AN- THOMAS B. HUMI"t-fREY. ..JR. LARKI~, HOFF~IAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. ATTORNE:.YS AT LAW 1$00 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CE:NTE:R 7900 XE:RXE:S AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 TE:I.EPHONE 16121 835-3800 F"AX 16121 896-3333 2000 PIPER ,JAFFRAY TOWER 222 SOUTH NINTI-I STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE l6121 338-6610 FAX 16121 336-9760 NORTI-I SUBURBAN OFF"ICe: 8990 ~PR'NG9ROOK DRiVe:, SUITe: 250 COON RAPIDS. MINNE:SOTA 55433 TEL.E:PHONE 1612] 786-7117 FAX 16121 786.6711 Reply to Bloomington MEMORANDUM TO: William R. Ottensmann, Coon Rapids City Engineer James E. Schrantz, Andover Public Works Director FROM: Gregory E. Korstad and Charlie Weaver Technical Review RE: Anoka County Landfill Siting Project: DATE: November 14, 1989 cc '~ ///Z-I/f) \&,~ I OAVID.J. PEAT U. - 0- M'CH^<C T, McK>M CH....RL.ES R. WEAVER HERMAN L.. T"-L.L.E VINCENT O. ELt.A ....NDReW.J. MITCHE:LL ..JOHN A. COTTER" BeATRICE A. ROTHWEILER PAUL. B. PLUNKETT ALAN L. KILCOW KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN MICHAEL a.LEBARON FRANCIS e:. GIBERSON TRACY R. EICHHORN' HICKS" AMY DARR GRADY CATI>iERINE BARNETT WILSON If .JC,.'REY C. ANDERSON OANIEI. L.. BOWLES TODD M. VLATKOVICI>i TIMOTHY .J. MC:"""NUS GREGORY E. KORSTAO l.ISA A. GRAY GARY A. RENNE:KE TI>iOMAS H. w!:AVER SHANNON K. MCCAM8RIDGE MICHAEL. S. COIo4E:N DENISE M. NORTON GARY A. vAk"el.~E MICI>iAEl. e. SRAMAN .JOSE:P!-l W. DICj(E:R .JACQUItI..INE: ,.. Olli;'T%. GAYl.EN 1... KNACK ROCNE:.Y D. Ives .JUL.I":: A.......R...S..:: CHRISTOPHER.J. HARRISTHAI.. SHARON I... BRENNA MARII(AY eAN"'GA I..ITZAU TIMOTHY.J. KE:ANE ,JON R. NORBEAG WILLIAM C. ORIFF'ITH TloI EODOR!: A. MONOAI..E: ,JOHN .J. STEF'F'E:.NHAGEN 0,10."1 I EI.. W. voss .0'" COUNSEL ..:OSEP!-l GITIS AICHARD A. NOROBYE. "",L.SO ....C..uT"iED IN WISCONSIN This memorandum presents the recommended approach for the cities of Andover and Coon Rapids to obtain the appropriate data collection, technical review and analysis necessary to evaluate and provide a critical review of the Anoka County Landfill Siting process. Issues of Concern The Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Decision has identified a number of issues of concern for review in the EIS. These issues are described in Part III of the Scoping Decision. Sixteen required areas of study are identified in the scoping decision. These are reduced to five general areas of concern. These concerns are: l. facility technical issues; 2. socio-economical impact; 3. land use impact; 4. human wildlife and plant life affect health risks; and 5. solid waste management/miscellaneous effects. Each of these issues is discussed below. We advise that you retain experts in each of these fields capable of critically reviewing the c:>relevant issues as well as work done by the county and the EIS. We LARKIN, ROFFe-lAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD, OMr. William R. Ottensmann Mr. James E. Schrantz November 14, 1989 paqe 2 reviewed these issues and identified a competent consultant capable of performing the necessary tasks on behalf of your cities. Facility Technical Issues The scoping document identifies geologic and hydrogeologic impacts and surface water impacts as issues of concern. In addition, the scoping document also indicates that there should be an analysis of landfill gas hazard,'noise pollution, general nuisance issues, and technical facility design and construction concerns. These issues generally relate to the manner in which the proposed facility is constructed and involve substantial engineering work in order to prevent adverse effects. It is also necessary to thoroughly evaluate the geologic and hydrogeologic setting of the site to identify, site specific conditions requiring special handling. . I have contacted Gordy Hess, a local geology expert employed by ERM North Central Inc., a national environmental consulting firm. Mr. Hess has consented to perform these services at your direction. Socio-Economic Impact Of perhaps greater concern than the technical operational aspects it is the socio-economic impact of the siting decision on the community. My extensive experience with landfills lead me to conclude that very few, if any operational issues are substantial enough to not be able to be addressed by site specific engineering and facility design. Socio-economic issues, however are not readily responded to and require substantial careful consideration. Moe Dorton, a socio- economic consultant formerly employed by the Metropolitan Council has been contacted and is recommended for this portion of the analysis. Land Use Issues The impact of the siting decision on adjacent uses of land and the physical impact to adjacent property from traffic and noise is a substantial community concern. In addition, inappropriate land use decisions can have substantial effects on real estate value. The traffic and noise analysis is a technical scientific analysis based upon substantial knowledge of the science of sound and the mechanics of traffic movements. The land use compatibility analysis and property value impact is somewhat less scientific. Because of the more subjective nature of the land use issues, it is essential that analysis of these issues be performed by experts familiar with both land use planning and property valuation, as well as solid waste O industry. The Hoisington Group, Inc., has served as consultants to a number of similar projects and brings that experience to this project. LARKE'., HOFF:YIA~, DALY & LINDGRE:::-J, LTD, ~r. William R. Ottensmann ~. James E. Schrantz November l4, ,l989 Page 3 Waste Management and General Issues The environmental review scoping decision has made a number of assumptions relating to the overall solid waste system in the metropolitan area. These assumptions were made in the initial phases of the siting process and are based on a number of factors which may not be accurate today. These factors include such concerns as 'whether recycling and waste reduction programs are working, the ability to remove potential serious contaminants from the waste stream and the ability of major waste processing facilities such as the UPA/NSP Refuse Derived Fuel Plant to change the landfilled portion of the waste stream. Included in these concerns is the overall ability of current facilities to accommodate exlsting and projected waste streams. We have contacted Lynne Bly and Associates, Inc., a consulting firm whose principals are Lynne Bly and John Harrington, both of whom who have substantial experience with the solid waste industry and regional waste disposal planning. This firm can be helpful not only because of its familiarity with the technical issues involved in waste disposal, but also because of past experience with Metropolitan Council. Human and Wildlife/Plant Life Health Risks , An additional key component of the technical analysis is review of what effect, if any this facility may have on animals, plants, and people and the area that may be effected thereby. We have identified two consultants that may be helpful in this field, Jeffrey Stevens, a health risk analyst and Lyle Bradley, a wildlife biologist. Consultant Review We recommend that a consulting team be assembled right away, so that they can review not only the scoping decision, but also existing information relating to their respective fields. This would assure that your consulting team has sufficient background specific to this project to be able to knowledgeably review the draft EIS as soon as it is available. Under the environmental review program, the DEIS is to be distributed to your city and an informational meeting is required to be held. The scheduling is totally in the control of the county. Your consultants will need to be able to react within the parameters set in the county's schedule. The consultant's role as we see it is not only to review the information in the DEIS, but also to the extent necessary compile additional data or conflicting data relevant to the decision to be ~ade. The goal of the consultant's review is to assure that all ..,elevant information is properly and thoroughly presented. In this way, a properly informed decision can be made. 3. ~@~ LAND USE CONSULTANTS Hoisington Group Inc. o FRED HOISINGTON - PRESIDENT HOISINGTON GROUP INC. EDUCATION M.S. Resource Development and Urban Planning, Michigan State University B.S. Urban Planning, Michigan State University MEMBERSHIPS AND AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association Minnesota Planning Association Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce. President 1988 Coalition For Sensible Land Use, Director Urban Land Institute , Edina Chamber of Commerce Wodd Future Society PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE FRED HOISINGTON is a land planning consultant with 24 years of public and private experience in Minnesota, Colorado and Michigan. He specializes in land analysis and planning for business, municipal and land development clients. Prior to forming his own firm, Mr. Hoisington served as Senior Vice President for Brauer & Associates; LTD.; Director of Planning for Traverse City, Michigan; President of Brauer & Associates Rocky Mountain, Inc., Colorado; Planning Director for Edina. Minnesota, and Assistant Planner, Tri-County Regional Planning Commission, Lansing, Michigan. While employed by Traverse City, he also served as Director for the Traverse City Housing Commission and as Acting Executive Director for the Downtown Development Authority. o REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE . Honeywell, Inc.; Feasibility Study, Preliminary Site Planning; Eden Prairie, MN . H. B. Fuller Company; Vadnais Heights, MN; Resource Management and Water Resources Plans, PUD, EAW, DNR and PCA Permits, Project Administration; Continuing Consulting Services . Wendy's of Minnesota; Public Agency Approvals, Edina and Richfield Stores 7300 Metro Blvd, . Suite 525 . Minneapolis, MN 55435 . (612) 835-9960 o o . Cardinal Creek Village Multi-Family PUD, EA Wand Feasibility Analysis;MZJ/Chimo Development Corp.; Eden Prairie, MN . Health Resources, Inc. (now Health East); Public Agency Approvals, Continuing Services; Hazel Ridge Seniors Housing Project; Maplewood, MN . James Swanson; 80 Acre Feasibility Analysis; Oakdale, MN . The Health "Central System; Health Care Campus Programming; Brooklyn Center, MN .' .... BMC Industries, Inc.; Preliminary Master Site Plan, White Bear Lake, MN . City of St. Paul, Recreation Center Site Selection Process. . Boundary View Residential Community, Land Development Analysis, Inver Grove Heights, MN . 16th FaiiWay_ Partnership" Land Use Plan, Madeline Island, WI . City of Grand Rapids, Zoning & Subdivision Control Ordinances. · City of Rosemount, Community Needs Study . City of Rosemount, Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance . Woodlake Sanitary Service, Landfill End-Use Planning, Eden . Prairie, MN . Stratford Wood III Multi-Family PUD and City Approvals Process, Mark Z. Jones II, Minnetonka, MN . City of Chanhassen, Downtown Redevelopment Concept Plan . City of Champlin, Old Town Redevelopment and TIP Plans · City of Shakopee, Canterbury Downs Race Track District Land Use and Transportation Study, Race Track District and PUD Ordinances · St. Peter Revitalization, Inc., St. Peter Downtown Economic Feasibility Study . . City of Chanhassen, Broadened Study Area, Land Use and Transportation . Plan · City of Chanhassen, Downtown Redevelopment(I'IF Plans .. City of Grand Rapids, Community Needs Study · Independent School District #272, Eden Prairie, MN; School Sites Selection · City of Traverse City, MI; Comprehensive Plan · Metropolitan Stadium Site, Bloomington, MN; Development Concept Plan . Touch of Class Interiors, Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning, City of Eden Prairie, MN · Anderson's Garden Shoppe, Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning, City of Eden Prairie, MN .. 2 o . City of Chanhassen, Downtown Parking Study . Yorktown Mall Shopping Center, Edina, MN; Parking Study . Lincoln Properties; Bloomington Shoppes Mall, Bloomington, MN; Parking Study . Lincoln Properties; Village Shoppes Mall,Wayzata, MN; Parking Study ,_ , . City of Grand Rapids, Planning/Economic Development Needs Study . City of Detroit Lakes, Downtown Redevelopment Program . City of Rosemount, Fire Station Location Study . Independent School District #272, Central Middle School Campus Plan; Eden Prairie, MN . City of Maplewood, Continuing Consulting Services . H. B. Fuller Company, Corporate Headquarters Master Plan; Vadnais Heights, MN . Calhoun Beach Apartments Litigation; Minneapolis, MN . Batzli Electric Condemnation/Testimony; Minneapolis, MN . Halla Nursery Condemnation/Testimony; Edina, MN . Chanhassen Condemnation/Testimony; Chanhassen, MN . Flying Cloud Landfill Litigation, BPI Waste Systems; Eden Prairie, MN . Scherber Condemnation/Testimony; City of Shakopee, MN . City of MinnetOIlka, Glen Lake Community Center Study . City of Minnetonka, Athletic Fields Needs Study . City of Chanhassen, Trunk Highway 101/5 Preliminary Align-, ment and Land Use Corridor Study . Hennepin County, Landfill Site Selection Process . City of Waconia, Comprehensive Plan Update . Woodlake Sanitary Service, Evaluation of Ash Monofill Impacts on Land Use; Medina, MN '.. . City of Chanhassen, Downtown Redevelopment Coordination . Southcross Properties Master Planning, Gonyea Land Company; Burnsville, MN' ' . East Bethel Landf"11l, Evaluation of Composting/Recyc1ing Facility Impacts on Land Use and Property Values; East Bethel, MN . Mumford Landfill, Evaluation of Impacts of Demolition Cell on Land Use; French Lake Township, MN o 3 rFJ@~ LAND USE CONSULTANTS o Hoisington Group Inc. HOISINGTON GROUP INC. Hoisington Group Inc. (HGI) was established in 1982 to offer land analysis and planning services primarily to municipal, business and land development clients. The firm specializes in larger scale projects which require the employment of several professional disciplines, which' projects often require the use of partiCipation techniques to build credibility with the public, landowners and others who might be affected by planning decisions. In 1988, HGI added the landscape architectural discipline and now offers site planning and urban design services. Hoisington Group Inc. provides continuing planning services to most of its clients. The following, is a partial list of clients served by HGI over the past seven years. o St. Peter Revitalization, Inc., St. Peter, MN City of Shakopee, MN City of Champlin, MN City of Chanhassen, MN City of Rosemount, MN City of Grand Rapids, MN City of Minnetonka, MN City of Long Lake, MN City of St. Paul, MN City of Maplewood, MN City of Waconia, MN North Memorial Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN Honeywell, Inc., Minneapolis, MN H. B. Fuller Company, St. Paul, MN BMC Industries, Inc., St. Paul, MN Wendy's of Minnesota, Edina, MN Health Resources, Inc., St. Paul, MN Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park. MN The Health Central System, Brooklyn Park, MN Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc./BFI Waste Systems, Eden Prairie, MN Mark Z. Jones Associates, Edina, MN Pierce Butler, St. Paul, MN Lincoln Properties, Edina, MN Independent School District #272, Eden Prairie, MN Gonyea Land Company, Bloomington, MN Sylvester Brothers Development Company, East Bethel, MN Mumford Sanitary Land Fill, French Lake Towns,hip, MN 7300 Metro Blvd, . Suite 525 . Minneapolis, MN 55435 . (612) 835-9960 ~@~ Hoisington Group Inc. LAND USE CONSULTANTS o HGI - SPECIFIC LANDFILL EXPERIENCE 1. East Bethel Landfill. East Bethel. MN Evaluation of probable property value and, land use impacts from the addition of a 'composting 'and shingle recycling facility to the existing East Bethel Demolition Landfill. 2. Mumford Landfill. French Lake Township. MN Evaluation of probable land use and traffic impacts resulting from the addition of a demolition cell to the existing landml. 3. W oodla:ke 'Landfill.' Medina. ' MN value and land use impacts of an W oodlake Sanitary Landfill. Evaluation of probable property ash cell addition to the existing 4. Flyin~ Cloud Landfill. Eden Prairie. MN Formulation of end use plans and evaluation of probable land use impacts associated with the expansion of the existing Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill. 5. Hennepin County Landfill Site Selection. Design and direction of the Hennepin County Landfill Site Selection Process that resulted in the identification and ranking of 13 potential landml sites. This project included a massive citizen participation program that identified site location parameters and established site screening criteria. o 7300 Metro Blvd, . Suite 525 . Minneapolis, MN S5435 . (612) 835-9960 :! ERM-NORTH CENTRRL-MSP TEL No ,612-454-0759 Nov 13,89 14:47 No,005 P.Ol Field of competence Seological and geophysical investigations of proposed and existing industrial and commercial sites. study and investigation of ground water conditions and potential impacts of development"land use, and water appropriation. Planning and installation of monitoring systems for determination of ground water conditions and quality and monitoring of subsurface gas condtions. Application of geophysical methods to site investigations and assessment. Planning and strategy for regUlatory and legal compliance of sites and facilities. Research in areas of hydrogeology, sedimen~ology, stratigraphy, and marine geophysics. E~erience Summary OVer 17 years of diversified geologic and environmental investigative experience which includes 2 1/2 years in private industry, 10 years of state and federal geologic survey work, and 5 years of environmental consulting. Direct involvement in development of geologic criteria for land use and suitability evaluation for placement of waste disposal sites. Supervision and management of projects evaluating environmental hazards in offshore areas targeted for oil and gas exploration, evaluation of ground water conditions and water quality, development of data base for state wide subsurface geologic study based on water well data and geophysical exploration, gravimetric surveys related to regional geologic studies as well as site specific conditions and evaluations. Direct technical experience in the areas of metal treatment, electronic component quality control, marine geologic research, developm~nt and installation of geophysical survey systems, ground water investigations, permit preparation, geologic mapping, preparation of reports, and presentation of findings at public meetings and before regUlatory agencies. credentials B.S. Geology - university of Minnesota (1968) M.S. Geology - University or Minnesota (1974) ph.D.Geology - Stanford University (19~5) professional Affiliations Geological society of America American ~ssociation of Petroleum Geologists o .; An affiliate Of ThE! Environmental Resources Management GrQUp with offices worldwide ERM-NORTH CENTRAL-MSP TEL No ,612-454-0759 Nov 13,89 14:36 No.004 P.02 o ERM:;ftonb CenfiQf.lnc. American Institute of Professional Geologists, C.P.G. #7469 society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Association of Ground Water scientists and Engineers Minnesota Ground Water Association (Secretary) Twin Cities Geolo;ists Renresentativ8 pro1eets Manage and/or conduct Superfund Remedial Investigations at sanitary landfills. Develop work plans for investigation of extent and severity of ground water contamination, remedial action plans, implementation of remedial action. Technical evalu~t~on or proposed clean up methodologies for soil and ground water contamin,ated by"oil and 'gas. Develop alternative remedial plans and cost evaluation for clean-up and site restoration. ' Development of monitoring program at mixed municipal waste facility including ground water, landfill gas, and air quality. Field inspection and certification of installed equipment ana facilities. preparation of NPOES permit application for ground water withdrawal and treatment facility. Manaqa and conduct aquifer tests at superfund sites for development of appropriate remedial actions. Prepare and assist industrial faci~ities and commercial developers in obtaining permits for ground water appropriation, land use, zoning changes, site plan approval, and compliance of site with state and local regulatory requirements. Manage and conduct environmental hazard assessment of outer continental shelf areas of Alaska and California prior to onset of oil and gas exploration activities. Assessment of resource potential and value of outer continental shelf areas. consultant to NASA Jet propulsion Lab in development and deployment of geophysical/geologic equipment for marine geologic applications. supervision of installation of equipment, performance evaluation, and modification. o ERt~-:-NIJ,RTH CnnRAL -MSP TEL No. 612-45-4-0759 Nov 13,89 14:jb NO.UU4 ~,U~ , I I E N V RONMENTAL RES 0 U R C e S MAN AGe MEN T o 'iT" he n~Y difficult enVl' .l.i. ronmental problems _ cleaning up hazardous waste lagoons. treating exotiC wastes. detoxifying contaminated ground waler. assessing pol. lutlon risks of Waste materials. disposing of radioactive wast.es-are the realm of a select few consulting firms. Witnin that vanguard. The ERM Group has the reputation for solVIng today's most difficult problems. When corporate giants 11ke .Johnson & Johnson. Exxon, Allied. Sun. Waste Management. Alcoa, Public Service Electric & Gas, Union Carbide, Champion. and Du Pont need heip. they ~:a11 on ERM. So do many smaller companies and govern- ment agencies, The ERM Group provides t.hem O comprehensive skllls In engineering, science, and busine5$ management to satisfy permit require- ments, meet compliance schedules. limit liability. SOLUTIONS FOR TODAY'S ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS and conserve resources, The diversity ofser- vices supplied by ERM to its clients falls Into the following major technical categories: . Air Pollution Control . Ecological Investigations . Hazardous/Solid Waste Muagement . Hydrogeological ,Investigationl . ManageJXlel1t COn$u1tJng . Wastewater Treatment . Water Treatment ~i 'i I , I I Part ofERM's success with dliftcult problems sterns from our experi- ence with this compre- hensive range of services; most of our succeSS, however. comes from tbe high caliber of people we employ, The typical ERM consultant has ten or more years' experi- ence In consulting or Industry: most are regis- tered professionals and hold a Master's degree or higher. When a consulting firm fu1f1llslls promise. Its busIness grows, ERM's growth Is eVIdence of th Is kind ofsuccess. III 1983, the first year ERM was el1g1ble. and again in 1984. ERM was named to INO Magazine's 500 list as one of the fastest. growing privately.held companies in America. We attrtbute this dlstlnc. tion to hard work and In. novative thinking-and to clients who have rec- ognized our abtltty to benefit their businesses. ERM-NQRTH CENTRAL-MSP TEL No ,612-454-0759 Nov 13,8~ 14:36 No.004 P,04 ENVIRONMENTAL RES 0 U R C E S MANAGEMENT INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SOLVING PREEMINENT POLLUTION PROBLEMS o SOlv1ng today's difficult environmental prob- lems requires knowledge ofleading-edge technol- ogies and the ability to create solutions where none existed before. ERM's strengths are in these , areaS. and our profession- als arc skilled in applying new technologies to situa- lions that will nol respond to standard methods. For example. ERM has worked on many premier projects in the hazardouS waste field. Among our significant achievements are the preparation of comprehensive hazard. ous waste facUlty slUng programs for agencies lT1 fifteen states and two , Canadian provinces: re- medial work at many hazardous waste sites designated on the EPA National Priorities List: conceptual and process design of commercial hazardous waste treat. menl facUlties: the design of several chemical waste landfills using slate-of- the-art cap/llner technol- 0'13 for leachate mlnlmi. zatlon and treatment: land treatment of Indus- trial and mlmlclpal waste,- walers: and monitoring and clean.up of ground water contaminated with toxic chemicals. ERM's skills with leading-edge technology have benefited clients most in these areas: . Site AssessP1ents and Closure Plans ' . DeUsting ofSpeclfic Wastes ' . Innovative Engineer- Ing Design . I.ow.levellbldioact1ve Waste Management . Site RemedialAction . Ground Water Detoxification . Waste Incineration A new serviee offered by ERM Is ~nvlrClnmental Compliance Audits, These studies help clients to comply precisely with state and federal regula- tions while fine-tuning their operating practices, Environmental audltg .. quickly Identlfy regula- toryproblems and outline recommendatlons to al- leviate the sltuat Ion. Our clients beneflt through the accurate basc of Inform- ation we provide them so they can make in(ormed decisions on potential l1abllltlt!S, hazards or operational problems. ERM-NQRTH CENTRAL-MSP T~L No.612-454-0759 . ' Nov lj,~~ 14;~C NO,UUq ~,u~ ENVIRONMENTAL RES 0 U R C E S MANAGEMENT 0- CREATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SOLVING . TRADITIONAL PROBLEMS Problems illvolvlng traditional pollutants -BOD, suspended solids. and process wastes- are often handled with conventional t.echnology usIng hardware-onented engllieeT1ng. Yet t.he, most economical and en. vlronmentally beneficial solutIons are often tho:<c that employ new engineering approaches to proven methodolo- gies, Developing creative solutions for superior result.q requln:s In-depth knowledge of both the conventional and the state-of-the-art, ERM's hands. on experIence with the preeminent, as . wen as the traditional pOl- lution problem mear\S . I hat we can !'lIve yuu objective recommenda- tions with proven success In Implementation - a solullon that Is the best of all choices. Traditional envlron- mental services Indude: . Industrial Waste. water Engineering . Industrial Waste Management . EnvirOlUDental Impact Assessment . Grou.nd Water Monitoring . Air pollution control Studies '." ".>:"~:;~~~lf?;(W,,,:..;:.:;{,;t'I!7-"- "..-'..: i'm, "J...';.,.Il'..,...,,;.... ", \.",;:1" . . o \ . Engineering Design . Water Supply Studies Our proficiency In these areas Is well known throughout thc Indus- trial and governmental marketplaces, ERM's dual competelwe !n tradI- tional and stat~-of-the.art technoloror has been the greatest benefit to clients within these markets, ~ ER~l-NOR TH C~NTRHC~TSP- rt:,LNO ,b 12~4::>4-U (::>':1 I'~OV 1';;;,0;:1 l.~.vt:J l'1U.VV':'+ r.vv ENVIRONMENTAL A E SOU R C E S MANAGEMENT o E RM IS a lmique envi- ronmental consult- ing (:ompany organized as a series of medlurn- sl?,cd companies that function together as a larger entity, Our (:lIcnts benefit from this orga.nl- zation because each office gives them the services, personal attention, and care that IS typically found only In smaller firms. At the same tlme. ERM'S MATRIX MANAGEMENT they have acces:s to the resources of the entire ERM Group throuWl a local affiliate that pro- vides whatever level of staff or expertise Is needed for a partl(:ular project, This also allows us to provide services throughout theUnlted States, ERM employs a mal1- agemcilt system that ef. fectively uses our clIent's project dollars by op- tlmizlng the teconical potential of each proft:s- slona! wllhin toe total organl;r.atlon. ERM per- sonnel work on projects based on technicalskiUS. not on seniority or litle, ERM's system means that senior stafTmembers spend most of theil' tlme all technical tasks so that projects are not burdened with excess adll1illlstra- tlve time. Because our manage- ment system emphasIzes te(:hnical skills. many new clients are surprised to learn Ibat the consul. tant representing ERM IS not a salesman but a technically-trained pro- fessional who is ready to work for Ihem. In the ERM system, the team that sells the work doe~ the work. o o o Lynne Sly & Associates, Inc. 13201 OZARK TRAIL NORTH STILLWATER MN 55082 (612) 439-9234 FAX: (612) 430-0115 LYNNE BLY & ASSOCIATES (LBA) provides a wide range of environmental consultin~ services to government and private business clients. Areas of practice incluae solid waste management, air and water quality, environmental analyses--EAW and EIS, legislative and regulatory strategy, technical review, technical writing, and land use planning and zoning. Since formation of LBA in 1986, a wide spectrum of public and private needs for consultant assistance have been met: Noodlake Sanitary Services: Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill, Remedial Investigation/Feasibili~y Study (RI/FS); Environmental Report for the Proposed Landfill Expansion BFI Medical Naste 8;ysteas: environmental studies and permit applications for proposed medical waste incinerators in Minnesota, Colorado, Iowa and Canada Anoka County: Solid Waste Master Plan; Testimony for MPCA and for the Legislative Commission on Waste Management for the Elk River Resource Recovery Facility Jtfirmesota DepartJleD.t of 1hmB.1l Services: Monthly Management Indicators Report Nashington County: RFP/Consultant Selection ,Process for the Lake Elmo Landfill EIS Jtfetropolitan Council: EIS for the Dakota County Resource Recovery Project; Supplemental EIS for the Hennepin County Transfer Station System City of cannon Falls: Review Local Zoning, Recommend Environmental Controls; Submittal of Comments on Proposed MPCA Air Emission Permit City of CorcorB.1l: Review and Comment on Hennepin County Candidate Landfill EIS Scope and Draft EIS Reports; Presentation of Testimony and Issues Papers to Minnesota Legislature on proposed amendments to Waste Management Act NEFC: Scoping EAW for the Minneapolis West Business Center, a 2.0 million sf office complex The principals in the firm (Lynne 81y and John Harrington) are well recognized for the quality and breadth of their technical expertise and ability to address and resolve complex and sensitive issues. Ms. BLY (president of LBA) has 15 years experience in environmental studies and comprehensive planning. Through May 1986, Ms. Bly managed the Metropolitan Council's Solid Waste and Air Quality programs, with supervisory responsibility for a 17 member Division and budget responsibility of approximately $2.5 million. Ms. Bly has had primary responsibility for review of resource recovery rrojects with combined processing capacities in excess of 7,000 tpd and review of and disposal proposals in excess of 20,000 acre feet. She is a past Chair of the Air Pollution Control Association's Land Use and Transportation Committee. She has made numerous presentations at a variety of waste management and air quality conferences and workshops, including the Sixth World Congress on Air Quality in Paris. Mr. HARRINGTON (LBA vice-president) has 20 years experience in comprehensive and environmental planning and management, with emphasis on water quality and related issues. He has directed area-wide water quality planning studies, been the permi ttee' s technical staff representative in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issuances, and successfully worked with the Minnesota legislature to provide state funding for the abatement of Combined Sewer Overflows in the Twin Cities. He has managed or directed numerous consultant and staff studies on such subjects as sewage sludge and solid waste composting and co. cOllposting, establishment of a cost-effective central pretreatment facility for electroplaters and circuit board manufacturers, and alternatives for utilizing or disposing of sewage sludge ash. He has made presentations at and lead numerous workshops on water quality issues. In 1984, he served as a delegate to the Second International Ash Utilization Conference in London. LYNNE BLY & ASSOCIATES is a Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise o LYNNE E. BLY 13201 Ozark Trail North, Stillwater, MN 55082 (612) 439-9234 LYNNE BLY &. ASSOCIATES, INC. May, 1986 - Present PRESIDENT -- Lynne Bly & Associates was formed in 1986 to provide consulting services to government and private business. Ms. Bly's areas of practice include solid waste management, air quality and environmental analyses; le~i~lative and r~gulatory strategy; technical writing/editing; and open space and land use plann1ng. Representative efforts have included: county solid waste management planning; landfill evaluations including permitting and superfund assessments; environmental review of large scale waste-to-energy projects; development of medical waste disposal facilities including waste characterization, management practices, assessment of emissions and residues" and analysis of regulatory proposals; assessment of waste transfer' facilities lncluding capacity requirements, recycling opportunities and integration of programs for management of household hazardous waste; environmental review for a proposed 2.0 million s.f. office complex; and proposal for expansion of a regional lIarina. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF THE TWIN CITIES AREA April,1980--April 1986 MANAGER, SOLID WASTE/AIR QUALITY -- 10/84 to 5/86. Direction of research, policy development, permit and environmental reviews, and legislative interaction. Expansion of Solid Waste/Air Quality program to 17 member Division, with budget control of approximately $2.5 .illion. Accomplishments included: * Development of regional plan requiring alternatives to landfilling municipal solid waste by 1990 and enactment of related legislation. * Environmental and permit reviews for mass burn, refuse derived fuel and co- composting resource recovery projects totalling more th~~ 6,000 tons per day. * Environmental and permit reviews for landfill developments and expansions in excess of 18,000 acre feet. Technical studies cOlDpleted during this period included rev 1Slon of the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality, a feasibility study of large scale co- compost facilities, comparative evaluation of organized vs. open waste collection systells, and a report to the Minnesota le$islature about means to mitigate or compensate for adverse impacts from waste d1sposal facilities. SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER - - 4/80 through 9/84 Responsibilities included management of environmental review for resource recovery projects in the Twin Cities Area.; public interaction and review of 20 potential landfill sites; coordination of the Council's Air quality Program; management of EPA/DOE ~rant for Analysis of Energy-Air Quality Linkages and Implications for Reglonal Development; and management of U. S. Air Quality Technical Assistance Demonstration Project evaluation of Emission Density Zoning. o Lynne E. Bly p. 2 o BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES July, 1978 - March 1980 SENIOR ASSOCIATE Major areas of practice were management of multidisciplinary environmental impact studies, land use and comprehensive planning, and micro and meso scale air quality analyses. Management responsibillties included contract negotiation, work program development, scheduling and supervision of study team efforts, oversight of subcontractor services and market development. Examples of major projects include: Downtown Stadium Feasibility Report for the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission; Ecological Impacts of Electric, Hybrid and Internal CQmbustion Vehicles for Argonne National Laboratory; Air Quality Analysis of St. Paul Downtown People Mover for the Metropolitan Council; and the Twin Cities Area Case Study for the National Commission on Air Quality. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF THE TWIN CITIES AREA August, 1974 - June, 1978 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER Assignments included a variety of studies and reviews for the Council's Solid Waste, Air Quality, Wastewater Control, Water Re;source Planning and Recreation Open Space programs. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: Member Air and Waste Management Association (formerly APCA). Member Governmental Refuse Collection and Disposal Association. Member Recycling Association of Minnesota. Member of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Ash Advisory Couittee. Past Chair of the Air Pollution Control Association's Land Use and Transportation technical committee. Ms. Bly has served in numerous positions on the Board of the Upper Midwest Chapter of APCA and also served for many years on the Advisory Council for the American Lung Association of Ramsey County and the Resource Council to the Minnesota Legislature's Joint Committee on Science and Technology. Ms. Bly has Illade numerous presentations at a variety of air quality and solid waste professional meetings, most notably at the Sixth Wol"ld Congress on Air Quality in Paris. EDUCATION: Macalester College St. Paul, Minnesota M.S., Environmental Health, 1976 U.S. EPA Fellowship Geography, Urban Planning, 1973 National Science Foundation Fellow Degree: B.A., Geography, 1973 Awards: Magna Cum Laude, Departmental Distinction, National Merit Scholar Awards: University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota Degree: Awards: University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin Studies: References Available on Request o o JOHN R. HARRINGTON 13201 Ozark Trail North, Stillwater, MN 55082 (612) 439-9234 LYNNE BLY & ASSOCIATES, INC. August-1987 - Present VICE PRESIDENT -- 8/87 to Present Since its incorporation in 1987, Mr. Harrington has been Vice Presiden.t of Lynne Bly &; Associates, Inc., a women's business enterprise which provides planning and environmental consultant services to public and private clients in the Upper Midwest. Mr. Harrington's roles encompass water resource, solid waste and ,land ~se planning; regulatory strategy; data base management and computer graphIc desIgn for the fIrm. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES July-1987 - June-1989 MANAGEMENT ANALYST -- 6/87 to 7/89 Develop, design and produce the Department's (first) Management Indicators Report, a monthly analysis and summary of the status of keY objectives a~ the Departmental Division level. Personal computer spreadsheet analysis and graphics are used to track and, evaluate three to six indicators ~er division, with exception analysis provided for activities requiring the attentIon of the Department's senior management. REGIONAL TREATMENT CENTER NEGOTIATOR -- 7/86 to 6/88. Established the process currently being followed by the Department to negotiate the future function and roles of eight state hos{litals and two nursing homes. Identified the issues requirin~ resolution, partIes and interests to be represented at the table during negotiatIons (labor unions, advocacy groups, counties, and local economic and poli tical interests), and directed the preparation of strategic options for the Department's treatment facilities. Based on these variables, developed a general process design and supervised consultant selection for a neutral mediator for the process. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF THE TWIN CITIES AREA St. Paul, MN SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE CHAIR -- 2/85 to 6/87. Coordinated and/or carried out projects of major Council significance involving research and policy development for which little knowledge and precedent existed. Major accomplishments included: * Enactment of legislation to provide the state's share of funding to abate combined sewer overflows in Minneapolis, St. Paul and South St. Paul (total program costs estimated in the $200,000,000 range). February, 1978 - June,1986 o * Mediating an intercolDllluni ty dispute involving traffic impacts associated with a major new office developllent in an already heavily developed area. Key issues included assignment of conditional responsibility for local highway improvements contingent on the timing, staging and location of development within the traffic impact area, and a.greement on an acceptable baseline aga.inst which to measure impacts (e.g. variable estimates of persons/vehicle and the potential effectiveness of traffic management proposals as mitigating measures). * Facilitating the Joint development of legislation that would permit the privatization of the Mlnnesota (state) Zoo. Parties were representatives of the Zoo Board and the bargaining units representing Zoo employees. * Coordinating staff analysis and review of the Bloomington Megamall, a proposed eight million square foot mixed-use retail entertainment complex to be developed on the former site of the Metropolitan Stadium. Critical issues involved traffic impacts, effects on regional retail shopping patterns, and estimates for tourisll potential. o John R. Harrington p. 2 MANAGER, WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM 10/81 to 1/85. Directed the preparation of revisions to the regional sewer plan, review and approval of the regional sewer authority's five year implementation program and annual capital budget, and the sewer elements of local governments' comprehensive land use plans. Directed efforts to site a landfill for disposal of sewage sludge ash. Supervised, directed, and/or coordinated technical studies including: potential for utilization of sewage sludge ash; solid waste composting and co-collposting with sewage sludge; evaluation of cost-effective wastewater pretreatment options for electroplaters and circuit board manufacturers, includin~ the use of a centralized facility (the facility, the first of its kind in the Unlted States, opened in the summer of 1988); water quality modeling and water pollution abatement options for both point and non-point sources. SENIOR PLANNER, WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM --2/78 to 10/81. Prepared staff analyses of the regional sewer authority's five year implementatioI} program and annual capital budget, including their consistency with the Council s long range regional sewer plan. Drafted major sections of the regional comprehensive sewer plan, particularly on-site system (septic system) requirements. Reviewed and analysed local government cOllprehensi ve plan land use, demographic and sewer elements to assure that projected sewer flows werg consistent with the capacity of the regionalsystell. August, 1977- January, 1978 PRIVATE CONSULTANT Boston, MA Conducted the "Assessment of Wildlife and Fish", required by the Forest and Rangelands Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974, for the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COUNCIL Boston, MA June 1966 - July, 1977 DIRECTOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING: PROJECT MANAGER, AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 7/73 to 7/77. Developed work program, budget, grant application and secured funding for a $2.3 million planning effort required by Section 208 of the Federal Water Quality Act. Supervised, directed and administered all elements of the program, involving more than 30 staff and 10 consultant contracts in the preparation and integration of regional demographic, land use, and wastewater engineering components of the plan. MANAGER OF RESEARCH AND REVIEW PROGRAMS -- 7/72 to 7/73. Directed and coordinated regional reviews of local units of government applications for federal financial assistence in accordance with O.M.B. circular A-95. More than 150 local units of government and applications involving in excess of $200 Dlillion were involved. Directed the Council's efforts in several transportation/land use research efforts. PRINCIPAL PLANNER 7/70 - 6/72. ASSISTANT P~~NNER 2/69 - 6/70 PLANNING ASST. 10/67 - 2/69. PRINC. STATISTICAL CLERK 6/66 - 9/67 PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: Member, American Planning Association. Member Small Towns Institute. Member Twin Cities Citizens League, and member Community Information Committee. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts (1969) Boston College, Boston, MA. Graduated Magna Cum Laude. POST-GRADUATE TRAINING: Several courses in the use of personal computers, software, and in negotiation of sensitive public policy issues. PUBLICATIONS: "NO FREE LUNCH: MANAGING THE REGION'S NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE O 1980s", published in CHANGE, CHALLENGE AND CHOICE IN THE NEW DECADE, a collection of Metropol i tan Councll essays!i15Ouftlle!~8US---------'----- References Available on Request PACE LAN6'V~14~r89-fl: 41' LARKIN HotFl1AN .B,U1TN, . 6125443974 Nov 14,89 10:51 ~'f02 o ecp.".nc. Education Memberthlp o PubllcalfOM JEFPRSY DRY AN I'llVENS, I'h" Progrom Manager, R/tIC A.."mtlnl ".podm.nt eoMU'""fI ..rile., DtvlfIon M/nnNotlr RflQlonal 0ffIc. ., Or, Steven' Joined PAOE In 1989 as the Program Msnager of the Risk A"sssm(Jnt asp,rtm,nt. HI$ ,..,pon,lbllltl,s Include development -.and Implementation of department prc~rams, ,taff ,up,rvl,lon and project man,gement. Prior to Joining PAOE, Or, St.vens was head of 1M Toxicology progflm st th' School of Public Health, Unlv.rllty of Minnesota. He was '.,ponslbltt for toxlcQlogy curriculum cours. ",.vs/opmsnt and ,upsMllon of 15.18 MS, MPH, PhO stud,nt. ".r year. Ourlng thIs tlm., Dr. Stevens reoelved 16 r"sarah grantilcontracts and publl$h.d more than 45 re"arch artlclei/ab.traots. A' a faculty member In the School of Public Health, pro Steven, tlughtgr.du,t.-I.v.1 cour.." In toxicology, ph.rm,cokln.t1c., . and H.l/th FU,k A$$,,,m,nt, H. ."0 conducted ,..,arCh on blochemlc.' mechanisms and pharmaooklnetlcs of toxlc.nts, Or. St.vens contlnull to hold an adjunct appo/ntm,nt In the school. In 1987, Or, St,v,n. fovndfld hi. own consulting firm, J. B. Stevens and Assoclat'$ which plon."ed the d,vs!opment of ,tat,.of.the.art Human 'Hlalth Risk A",,,m,ms. prIor to thar, h, served a' a prlvat. con.u/tant to many local companle, and stste agencies. In 19S9, J. B., St.v.n. ,and As,oe/at" Joln,d PACE SI staff of our RIsk Assessment Department. Or. Stevens' proffSslonal exptJr/ence 'nolutls,: Member. MPCA Wat.r Quality TechnIcal AdvIsorY. Oommltt"i M,mber . MPCA Air Toxic. Advisory Committee; M'mb.r . Mlnn'lJPO.lI. Lead Task Force; M.mbtr . Air Pollution Control AssociatIon Planning Bosro...rs. of risk asses,m.nt; Memb,r . Task Fore. to establish an AIr Toxlcs Program In the Division of Air Quality, MPCAi and Memb9r - Mlnne,ota Stat. Department of H"nh Task Force..fo ass'" ,nvfronm,nt8l {,.d exposure In Minneapolis and St. Paul, MN. March of Dimes Post-doctoral Fellow In Toxicology, UnIversity of Iowa, 1976.1980 . Ph.D., BIochemistry, Comsll University Medical Colfegs, 1976 Minors. Pharmacology, Physiology M.S., Sloch,mlstry, Michigan Stale Unlv,,,lty, 19.,0 B.S., Sloch,mlstry, MIchigan Stat. UnIversIty, 1970 American AssociatIon for th, Advancement of ScIence American Public Health Association N.w York Academy of Se/.nces AIr Pollution Control AssocIatIon Who's Who In the Midwest A campl.t$ list Is available upon requ6st. ACE LANOV-14-'-s9-i1: 41' LARKIN HQIT'.!'1AN_Bl-MTN. . I 6125443974 Nov 14,89 10:52 ~'fu3 .,', ,.~I.'"., J,- Stevens & Associates 3042 BENJAMIN ST. NE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 65418 (612) 781.7925 June 12, 1989 Ms. Leslie Knapp Donohue Engineers , 7,200 Hemlock Lane, North Sufte200 Maple Grove. M~ 55369 Dear Ms. Knapp: J.B. Stevens & Associates (JBSl is pleased to submit a proposal to you for a ' health risk IIssessment on the chemical emi~$ions from II proposed sanitary land- ftll site (Site G) in ~ashington county, Minnesota. Our personnel expertise and experience qualifies us for this task. For this particular 'project we have formed II team between ourselves and Wenck Associates, a local engineering firm experienced in chemical leaching and groundwater movement analysiS. In 1980, I became a faculty member in the School of Public Health at the University of Minnesota, Presently, t am the head of the toxicology specialty tract in the Division of Environmental and Occupational Health and as such teach graduate level courses 1n toxicology, pharmacokinetics and health risk assessment, In 1987, I started J,B. Stevens & Associates aftar private consulting for local industry for six years. As of JUlY 1, 1989 I will voluntarily move to 50% time status at the University, which allows me to devote 50% time to the company. To date, JSS has completed numerous multi.med1a health risk assessments on a variety of chemical em1s$ion sources. We have completed three health risk assessments on hazardous waste sites (one in Indiana. one in Iowa and one in Utah) and one assessment of an ROF ash landfill site in Minnesota (for NSPl. The Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual guidelines were used for all of these projects. We are not an engineering firm, our emphasis is en the biological aspects of , environmental pollution. The environmental engineering aspects of this project will be provided by the expertise of Wenck Associates (see Statement ot Qualifications). Wanek Associates has extensive ~xper1ence in Washington County, specifically at ~andfill No, 1. Our unique combination of toxicologists, vateri. narians, ecologists and environmental chemists, along with my accesS to various University of Minnesota faculty enables us to skillfully address the myriad of complex human health and ecological issues present in these types of projects. o ~..t: .' Fl CE L AN6'V~ 14 ~'8:~nl : 42 'LARKIN HOFI..tIAN _Bl-MTN. . 6125443974 Nov 14,89 10:53 ~'~04 o I h~ve enclQsed ! description of both firms, an overview of the tasks envisioned by us for this project, a proposed budget based on our understanding of the tasks to be completed. and my reSume. 1 hAve also included signed copy of your Agreement and General Conditions of this co"tract. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (612) 378.2838. I l~ok forward to working with you on this project. eerely, f", ( ('( ~l^.. , ",._, ,~~ Stevens, Ph.D. .;.. " ~O ACE LAN6v14"'r8'~'- 11: 4:3 "LARKIN HOIT..MA.N.~LMTN, . ' 612 544 3974 Nov 14,139 10 :53 f',5J5 o MANAGEMENT APPROACH J.B. Stevens & Associates takes pride in its will1ngness to work closely with a project proposer in developing a final document that will meet the needs of our client., This is especially true when we collaborate with local companies on local projects, as 1s the case here. Or. Jeffrey B. Stevens personally'manages each project conducted by the firm. The other team members have expertise in tOXicology/pharmacology, environmental chemistry and veter1nary science. Wenck Associates are experts in environmental engineering and ecological assessment. BUDGET Task 1: Hazard Evaluation Review existing site 1nvestigationdata for completeness, characterize the pro- posed landfill and the current and future use patterns of the surrounding area, identify potential human and environmental receptors, and select the appropriate indicator chemitals for further evaluation. Task 2: Toxicity Assessment Generate complete toxicity profiles tor all indicator chemicals at the site (maximum of lO-lZ) summarize the relevant information for this site, compile relevant chemical ARARs and $tate and federal criteria on tne indicator chemi- cals, artd develop route-specific criteria as needed. . Task 3: Exposure Assessment Model pot~ntial chemical movement from the site by the primary transport routes, model all necessary secondary transport routes, quantify receptor exposure to indicator Chemicals. ' Task 4: Risk Characterization . Calculate chemical-specific and overall cancer risks and nonRcancer health risks for the landfill site, discuss the major uncertainties (and the assumptions utilized) 1n these estimates, and relate these risk estimates to state guidelines. ' Task 5: Support Provide the necessary support to Donohue in presenting and defending the results of the risk assessment before the publiC and Wash1ngton County. The budget estimate assumes three meetings 1n Lake Elmo or St. Paull each attended by Dr. Stevens and Wenck Associates. o PACE L ANOV- 14 - '-89 - i 1 : 4~, ~B~KIN HQl]"l1AN .B,LMTN, 612 544 3974 Nav 14.89 10: 54 ~'~6 o Washington County Sanitary Landfill Health Risk Assessment This task involves a quantitative assessment of the potential health risks associated with chemical em1s$1ohs from a proposed sanitary landfill in Washington County, MN. It is our understanding that only Site G will be eval- uated in this project, but that two site useage alternatives are to be , addressed--the disposal of mixed municipal solid waste or the disposal of mixed municipal solid waste incinerat~r ash. It is ,ijrther understood that all necenary hydrogeologic evaluations wl11 be completed by Oonohue and provided to the subcontractor. J.B. Stevens & Associates along with Wenck . Associates will review thde data and consult with Donohue on any additional information that may be needed. o Hazard Identification The overall objectives of this initial task of the health risk assessment are to: 1) describe the proposed landfill. and the current and Tutu,re area UMllgG patterns within a two-three ki10meter radius of the site; 2) review the existing site investigation data for completenesst 3) identify lnd characterize potential human and environmental reCeptors that may be impacted, ~y this site (on"site, as well as off-sHe receptors); 4) select the 1ndicatorchemicals that wl11 be used to quantitatively characterize the risks at this site. The selection of the indicator chemicals for this site will be conducted in a similar manner to that proposed in the Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manua 1. We have wri tten an addendum to the SPHEM that further deta 1'1s our ; approach to this selection process (see Appendix A), For this site, we will in1- , ,1 PACE LANoV i"PS9-f1= 44LA~KIN HQIT.t1A('LBl-MTN. 612 544 3974 Nov 14,89 10: 55 ~'707 o tially examine the municipal solid waste characterization data supplied by Donohue. This will be compared with our in-house information on MSW landfill emissions and the data gathered to date by the Division of Solid Waste at the MPCA. J.B. Stevens alread~ has a summary of that information. The most likelY contaminants to be released from the site wil' be placed on I preliminary chemi- cals of concern list. The list wi" be the starting document for the screenlng proceS$. Our experience with incinerator ash. landfilling indlcat~s that the toxic metalS, specifically As. Be, Cd, Crt Pb, Ni and Hg are.the'most1mportl~t to evaluate. Also, recent studies have suggested that dioxin (PCOO/PCDF) may also be present in ash'and be released from the site, We have not addressed this issue pteviously, but we are prepared to evaluate PCOO/PCDF for this project if necessary. o Toxicit~ Assessment ~ Once the chemicals of concetn have been identified, the second task is to characterize their known toxicological properties. with speCific reference to the most important ex~osure routes, the length of tlme of exposure required to elicit effects and sensitive receptors. We typically provide a detailed profi1e of each chemical substance as an appendix to the Assessment, while summarizing the most pertainent information to the project on each chemical l~ the text. An example of one of these deta1led toxiclty prOfiles is attached as Appendix B. Also included in this sectlon of the report is a list of chemical ARARs for the site and 4 list of relevant chronic reference doses and/or carcin- ogenic potency factors. Because many of the U.S. EPA criteria are route specific (usually otal), we either generate additional route-specific criteria (e.g. for PACE LAr'fo,\r :i"PS9-n: 4$. :1,.8fi!K~N HOFf.t1AN ..B~MTN, 612 544 :5974 Nov 14,89 10; 55 p.?Oe o inhalation or dermal exposure) or normalize the exposure doses from these other routes to the oral route. A pharmacok1netic approach is utilized for these route-to-route extrapolations. tn many cases. e.g. acute exposure effectSI no criteria exist. In this-~ase we will derive the necessary values from the scien- tific database. We have preformed this task for the MPCA on several projects to date. We do not subscribe to the TLV appro~ch in this endeavor; although it is expedient and easily performed. it generally lacks a sound toxicological foundation. Exposure Assessment The objectives of the exposure assessment task are to: 1) identify the relevant exposure pathways of the emission substances to the receptors (both human and environmental) at this site, and 2) quantify receptor exposure to the emission substances from these pathways. Based on the information obtained in the hazard identification section of the report. various exposure'pathways will be "screened" for inclusion In the detailed analysis. Example tab'e, of our screen1ng process for on-site receptors. off-site receptors and ecological receptort.are provided as Appendix C. Once pathways have been chosen, their quantitative evaluation comprises two databases--env1ronmentalfate afld transport of the chemicals through the pathways and receptor exposure mode11ng. The environmental fate and transport section quantifies chemical movement from the site. The primary routes of chemical migration include: o o chemical leaching into the groundwater. with subsequent groundwater migration offs1te ~ fugative dust emiss10n and dispersion of contaminated surface soils/debris o emission and air dispersion of volatile substances . contaminant runoff into local surface waters ~ PAGE LA~O.v ..14 _',E;I;U.1,:4Q LARKIN HOFFMAN BLMT~l, .. - . . -- ..... 612 544 3974 Nov 14,89 10:56, ~909 o Secondary transport routes can also be evaluated if the site conditions warrant. These exposure routes include: o chemical accumulation in fish o chemical accumulation in agricultural foedstuffs (milk, beef, pork, eggs, etc.) . chemical accumulation in garden vegetables/field crops in the adjacent area '0 Present1y"J.a. Stevens & Associates does not have the capability to model chemical leaching thr.ough soil. groundwater movement andsurhce runoff' of contaminants from the site. For this proposal we have joined with Wenck Associates. since their expertise falls within these areas. ThuS, the two firms compliment each other. Wenck Associates have compiled a sep~rate task descrip- tion for their component in this propos~l (Ap~endix 0). We also are not equipped to conduct detail~d air emissions release (volatiles and fugative dusts) from the site. but we can model these phenomena using the simplified approaches, as mentioned in 1PHEM. I We are f,ul'y equipped to model any or all of the s~condary transport routes , that may be required for this site evaluation. In tact, we are perhaps a leader in the modeling of chemicals through the agricultural Toodchain. In the receptor exposure modeling section the calcu1ated environmental media levels of chemicals ~re translated into receptor exposure doseS (mg/kg/d). This translation requires a knowledge of both physiOlogical paramenters (e.g. How much a; r does a person i nhal e each day? What is the surface area of a person's skin? How much does an average person weigh? etc.) as well as behav- , ' ioral parameteri <e.g. How much water,does a person ingest? How much and what types of food does a person fngest?). Many of these parameters have been stan- 4 PAr. E ~ ~o'y" ~,,,\ .: ,~~ J.J. ; 4fi ,i.-a~KIN HqF.ftlA~, ,J31,.(1TN. ,612 544 3974 Nav 14,69 10:56 ~1~0 '. ' o dardited by the U.S. EPA and are utilized \n most if not all HRA (e.g. human body weights). However, many are not. We have been work1ng elose1y with the MPCA for the past two years to $tand~rdlze many of thfse behaviora1 and physiological input parameters foro-the State of Minnesota. The culmination of this endeavor will be HRA guideline documents for the Divisions of Water Quality, All" Quality, Hazardous Waste and Solld Waste. Thus, we are uniquelY aware ot the appropriate exposure assessment assumptio~s accepted by the M?CA staff. Both reasonable worst elSe and -realistic case exposure scenario data are modeled for eaj::h expo- sure pathway. aisk Characterization Our ris\!. characterization section essentially followS EPA guidelines. Non~ cancer health risks are quantified using the hazard index approach; carcinogenic rhKs are quantified from potency factors. And, the appropriate chemical- specific riskS are summed to arrive at overa'l health riskS. In addition to the above calculations, we provide a fairly extensive discussion of the variability , <or uncertainty) that exists with respect to those exposure pathways (and chemi- cals) found to be most important in this project. We also relate the final risk estimates to the relevant state criteria/gUideline" We suggest deviating from the media-specific risk eharactsrization approach outl~ned in SPHEM for this project. The SPHEM addreSses media-specific risks because a risk assessment determines which chemicals in which media are the most hazardous. Remediation options may then be determined. This is not the case in this project. Rather, we suggest a multi-media exposure assessment where risks c:> t. the recept.rs are addressed wIth res,eot t. t.tal dose. i.e. from all rele- vant routes. This approach 15 uti11lSd in the State of Minnesota for permitting MSW incinerators. ~ , . ....,. PACE LA~Q,\U,4 ..:,~~...V.: 4.t~.e~KIN H91J'.!:1A(iwBI-MTN. 612 544 3974 Nov 14,89 10:57 ~li,l . '" o Washington County Proposed ~andf111-.Llk. Elmo Qff.site Human Receptor 1. Individual who ~s born and whO lives hls/her whole life (10 years) adjacent to the proposed landfill. bpos\ll'e to ehemic~l pollutants viat a. Inhalation of VOC'$/pal'ticulates/VOC's in water b. tngestion of water c. Ingestion of home grown veggies d. Ingestion of 5011 e. Swimming in Eagle Point ~Ike f. Ingestion of fish g. Cermal contact with volatiles/dusts/Vae's in water h. Odors .1$0 evaluated On~s1teHuman Receptor 1. Individual whO works at the landfill S hr/d for 40 years. Exposure to chemica' pollutants v~a: a. Inhalation of VOCII/particulates b. Inc~denta' lngestion of so11 c. Oermal contact with voe's and dusts Qff-slte Environmental Re~.~tors 1. Horses re11cl1ng nearby a. Inhalation of vOCls/port~eulates , b. I ngut i on of water t. Ingestion of lOcally.gro~n foodstuffs ~ d. Ingestion of 5011' ..-- 2. Nearby Agricultural Crops/Home Gardens a. Air impacts b. Irrigation impacts 3. Flora/Fauno of Park a. Air impacts b. roodcha1n impacts 4. Flora/Fauna of Eagle Point ~~ke (Fish/airds) . ,8 o 1 VJ JfrJjs 1/:1JfJIt/ I Ji/6 ~ C {C- { __.,.._,6 11/:J-tl11 o .__....~-~., R' ECEr,rED' aen 11989 October 30, 1989 CITY OF ANDOVER James E, Schrantz Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevord NW Andover MN 55304 Deor Mr. Schrantz: The 1989 legislature created a new Regional Transit Board and chonged the boundaries of some of the districts. I have been selected to represent District F, western Anoka and western Hennepin Counties, This is almost the some area I represented when I served on the Metropolitan Transit Commission several years ago, For those of you who don't know me, I'd like to tell you a little about my tronslt and local government experience. I have been a city employee for twenty-eight years, the last fifteen as Director .of Accounting for Coon Rapids. I also served four years on the Anoka City Council. I do believe I have a good feel for municipal government. and an understondlng of the concerns of local officials on transportation Issues in the metropolitan oreo, Iserved on the MTC for six years. two years as Vice Chairman, and I have served on the'RTB since It was created. I also serve as the RTB representative on the Tronsportotlon Advisory Board (TAB). There are many important Issues facing the Regional Transit Board: improving transit in the suburban orea. looking at transit financing mechanisms. continuing to Improve transit for the elderly and disobled, and working with cities and counties on light rail transit development, Your Ideas and concerns ore welcome and appreciated, I can be reached at 755-2880 or 421-1213, also at 430 Rice Street. Anoka, MN 55303, If you would iike to discus:; transit Issues. piease call me. I will olso be hoppy to meet with you, or ottend meetings Inyour community, I look forward to serving as your representative on the Reglonol Transit Board, Sincerely. R~~ Ruth Franklin RTB Board Member District F o RF /smf An Equal Opportunity Employer r (' o GOOD \VAlVE HOMES rcj-/7 October 25, 1989 pEe ETIlEfl HI oen I ]989 U -----" CITY OF ANOove~ Mr. Jim Schrantz City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Anoka, MN 55303 RE:. Hidden Creek East Second Dear Mr. Schrantz: In the event that the title problem involving Hidden Creek East Second is not solved, Good Value Homes, Inc., acknowledges it's willingness to pay utility construction for all improvements in that subdivision. Sincerely, Peterson sident of Development /j cc: Dave Baum, Arcon Contruction John Rotenberg, TKDA o GOOD VALUE HOMES. INC, . Registered Builder. 1460 93rd Lane N,E.. Blaine. MN 55434-4396 . Phone: (612) 780-5510 ( r o ~ "., - " :", ' ~//\: October 25, 1989 ,,- E r- ;;;;-~-..-;. ~ ,"'"" U ~t)Vtfl ~ \. OCT:5 1 1989 U Mr. Jim Schrantz City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Anoka, MN 55303 CITY OF ANDOVER RE: H~dden Creek East Second Addition Dear Mr. Schrantz: This letter acknowledges Good Value Homes' willingness to waive the public hearing and accept the four cents per square foot assessment for area and trunk storm sewer in that part of Hidden Creek East Second Addition which drains into the city of Andover. Sincerely, . Peterson r,esident of Development /j Enclosure o GOOD VALUE HOMES. INC. . Registered Builder. 1460 93rd Lane N,E" Blaine. MN 55434-4396 · Phone: (612) 780-5510 TOlTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Honorable Mayor and City Council Andover, Minnesota 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL MINNESOTA 55101 R~~rr- CITY OF ANDOVER ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS November 8, 1989 Re: Council Minutes Pu1dover,Mulllesota Commission No, 9149-989 Dear Mayor and Council: The following are engineerulg matters discussed at the regularly scheduled council meeting held on Tuesday, November 7,1989 at 8:01 PM, 1, Commercial Boulevard Alignment Me. Rodeberg presented a letter to the Council noting interest in developing residential properties in the south Watt's Garden Acres area and the dependency on picking a route for Commercial Boulevard, Jay Blake, City Planner, and Mr, Rodeberg discussed the options and proposed routes, Mr, Blake noted pros and cons of three different routes, Council Action The Council requested that the Plannulg and Zoning Commission hold a public hearing to discuss several routes, after which the matter would be retumed to the Council, 2, Award Bid/Wandersee AdditionJProject 89-22 Me. Rodeberg noted the bid came in higher than the estimates due to the time of year and size of project, Mr, Wandersee noted he would accept the bid, Council Action The Council approved award of bid to 0 & P Contracting in the amount of $25,173,90, 3, Final PaymentlBent Creek Estates/Project 88-20 Approved o o o . 4, Order Assessment Hearing/Proiects 87-3B and 88-1. Crosstown Boulevard Storm Sewer Mr. Windschitl requested an extension of the assessment hearing date to January to allow lime for a legal response, The City Council discussed the options, payment schedules and interest concerns, Council Action The Council set the assessment hearing date for January 10,1990, 5, AJ,1prove Plans and Specifications/Commercial Park Pond. Proiect 89-24 Councilmember Jacobson expressed concern over total cost of project, requesting that the City share of $20,000 not be utilized, Mr, Rodeberg stated that the project has been redesigned and reduced in size to serve just Hidden Creek East 2nd Addition and two lots in the Conunercial Park, Council Action The Council tabled approval of plans and specifications until a signed copy of the letter from Good Value Homes waiving the public hearing for tmnk storm sewer assessments is obtained, NIl'. Rodeberg will present the Engineer's Estimate at the next Council meeting, The Council meeting was adjourned at approximately 11:45 PM, o CITY of ANDOVER MEMORANDUM TO: Mavor & Citv Council COPIES TO: Department Heads FROM: David A1mqren. Bui1dinQ Official DATE: November 6. 1989 REFERENCE: OCTOBER 1989 Monthly Buildinq Report I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for the Month of October 1989: Total Building Department Income--October 1989 Total Building Department Income--YTD 1989 Total Va1uation--October 1989 Total Va1uation--YTD 1989 APPROXIMATE VALUATION $3,056,000.00 178,000.00 28,000.00 25,600.00 24,900.00 14,500.00 10,500.00 13,900.00 15,900.00 $3,367,300.00 FEES COLLECTED 19,833.41 755.00 15.00 525.00 2,549.03 107.50 400.00 50.00 135.00 15.00 1,050.00 132.00 475.00 $26,041.94 $238,513.97 $3,367,300.00 $31,325,816.00 BUILDING PERMITS 32 Residential 6 Additions 4 Garages 2 Redmode1ing/Finishing 5 Pole B1dgs./Sheds 1 Swimming Pools 6 Chimneys/Stove/Fireplace 3 Structural Changes/Other 6 porches/Decks 65 OTHER PERMITS 65 Building Permits 41 Heating 1 Heating Repair 21 Hook Up (Sewer) 40 Plumbing 43 pumping 16 Septic 2 Septic Repair 9 Well 1 Well Repair 21 Water Meter 33 Certificate of Occupancy 19 Contractor's License o Total Number of Houses Total Number of Houses Total Number of Houses Total Number of Houses YTD (1989) - 301 YTD (1988) - 313 1988 - 356 1987 - 391 DA/jp c o ~;';"""'" l { '~" ~t ;l "~.':"(:;.o~",;~'r.v;".~"" CITY of ANDOVER Regular City Council Meeting-November 21, 1989 _7_:30 P.M. Call to Order Resident Forum Agenda Approval Approval of Minutes Discussion Items 1. Issue Certificates of Indebtedness 2; ROW Acquisition/H. Smith 3. Commercial Park Purchase,Discussion staff, Committee, Commission 4. Recycling Report 5. Open Burning 6. Fire Department Requests 7. Personnel Committee Report 8. Election Equipment Non-Discussion Items 9. Set Date/Reconvene Budget Hearing 10. Approve Plans & Specs/Commercial Park Ponding ll. Receive Petition/Sycamore & l58th Area l2. Request Speed Study/Moore Estates/l58th Ave. Area l3. Approve Engineering Rates/Bonestroo Engineering Approval of Claims Adjourn CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO, Approval of Minutes DATE November 21, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. ITEM NO, Approval of MInutes BY: V. Volk The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: November 7, 1989 Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION November 21, 1989 AGENDA SECTION NQ Discussion Items DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance ITEM NO, 1. Issue Certificates of Indebtedness BY: Howard Koolick tK Finance Director FOR REQUEST Attorney Hawkins will have the bids for the 1989 Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness for Council to review and approve issuance of these certificates at the meeting. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE l\1t'\'\T~mhor ?1 . BY: AGENDA SECTION NO, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ITEM NO, 2. ROW Acquisition/ H . Smi th BY: The City Council is requested to authorize the payment to Hubert Smith for the pond acquisition as part of Project 89-l8, storm drainage for the SE part of Watt's Garden Acres. This cost is part of the storm drainage trunk system and we will be billing Coon Rapids for this acquisition and the acquisition of the pond in Kirby Estates. Attached is Bill Hawkins' recommendation. The complete appraisal is in my office if the Council wishes to review it. MOTION BY o TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o LAW OFFICES OF SurKe and JlawKins SUITE 101 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA 15150433 PHONE (6121 7804-21198 JOHN M, BURKE WILLIAM G, HAWKINS October 27, 1989 Mr. James E. Schrantz Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 CITY OF fo,NDOV; Dear Jim: I have had discussions with Hubert Smith regarding the City's acquisition of a portion of his property for utility, street and drainage purposes. The appraisal the City had on this matter was $7,500.00. Mr. Smith has indicated to me that he would be willing to accept the sum of $8,000.00 in settlement of any claims he may have as a result of this acquisition. In view of the time and expense the City would incur by the use of eminent domain it is my recommendation that the City accept Mr. Smith's offer of $8,000.00 in settlement. Would you please place this on the City Council agenda for November 21st for consideration. G. Hawkins WGH:mk cc: Mr. Hubert Smith OCT-18-89 WED 16:42 P.12I4 ,~ LAW OFFICES OF o gu,xe liRa flllwxiRS SUITE 1 01 211 COON /lAI'IOS IOUl.tvA~O COON ~"'''IOS. MINNESOTA '''''33 I"HONE ll!' 2) n...llllljle JOHN M, !IU~t<E WILl.IAM G. HAWKINS October 18, 1989 Mr. and Mrs. Hubert S. Smith 13309 Jay Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smith: I am writing as the attorney for the City of Andover concerning the need for acquisition of s~reet and utility easements over property that you own as well as acquisition of a pond area. AS you are aware the City has retained an appraiser for the purpose of reviewing your parcel and determining the amount of compensa- tion he feels is just and equitable as a result of the proposed taking. Mr. Curtis A. Larson has returned an appraisal whioh indicates his opinion of adequate compensation is $7,500.00. On behalf of the City I am offering you this sum for acquisition of easements over your property. I enclose for your information a copy of the legal description and drawings pertaining to the easements as well as a portion of Mr. Larson's appraisal. The full appraisal may be viewed at the Andover City Hall if you desire. Would you please inform me if this offer is acceptable and if s.o I will prepare the necessary C1ocument:s to complete the transaction. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, William G. Hawkins WGB:mk Ene. cc: Mr. James E. Schrantz o CT-18-89 WED 16:43 P.05 o Curtis A. Larson Appraisals 6240 Highway 65 Northeast Suite 207 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 (612) 571-1654 MARKET V AWE: APP~AISAt For Mr. William Hawkins At.torney At:. Law Cily of Andover, Minnesota 299 Coon Rapias SOuelvard Suite 11101 Coon ~apids, Minnesota 55433 of Damages To The Hubert S. and Loretla A. Smith Properly locate.:! At 13309 Jay Street Northwest Anoka Count.y Andover, Minnesota 55304 o CURTIS A. LARSON APPRA'SAI.S ".... -- . .....--. ~t ~~ ,~ :t oj! " V -"I: , " , ; l .' ~ i' I"' OCT-la-aS' WED 16 :43 P.06 , '0 I Curtis A, Larson Appraisals 6240 Highway 65 Northeast SUile 207 Minneapolis, Minnesota SS43a (612) 571-1554 October 9, 1989 Mr. Hawkins Attorney At Law for City of Andover, MN 299 Coon Rapids Boulevard, Suite ijl01 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55433 RE: Hubert S. and Loretta A, Smith 13309 Jay Street Northwest Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55304 Deal' Mr. Hawkins: submit Our evaluation of the referenced property. In accordance with your request and authorization, we h~rewilh l'personally inspe~ted lhe properly on Septemb~r 5, 1969. The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate lhe damages to lhe properly as the resull of a taking by The City of Andover, MN in f~ " ~ ~ ~ " dua process, tor purposes of Just Compensation. oj I\I~ As a re'sult. of OUr al".alyses and ConcluSions contained il~ lhe , follows: Land Only, atlached report, the damages lo the subject properly are as . i i ,,' i ~J Fair Market Value Prior to th~ Taking: Fair Market Value Atter the Taking: Damages Due to the Taking of Fge Tille of 76,000 S.F. $1$,000 56,115 S.F. 111,520 II Pond Area: TOTAt. DAMAGE:; 19,685 S.Il'. m 4,970 2,400 S,C. s 600 15,300 S,F. $ 1,910 -0- $ '1,460 $ 7,500 eU~TIS A. LAASON A~PAAI9ALS Damages Du~ to Permane~t R/W Easement Damages Due to Permanent Drainage Easement Severance Damages: ~ounded o ,.' o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE T\TQ"91l1ber :21, 1999 AGENDA SECTION NQ Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning . ~~ BY, Jay Blake~city Planne, ITEM Commercial Park Lot Sa e NO. Trapp Realty 3. REQUEST FOR The Andover City Council is asked to hear the request of Trapp Realty for a reduction of the price of the lots being purchased by the firm. Dan Pastorius will be at the meeting to make a short presentation BACKGROUND Trapp Realty has received a purchase agreement from City Attorney, Bill Hawkins for the purchase of two (2) lots in the Andover Commercial Park. They are proposing to construct an office warehouse building for a sheetrock distribution business. Additional information will be available at the meeting. See the enclosed map. COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY MOTION BY o TO "~ANDOVER COMMERCIAL PARK PHASE 1: o ,u.,' !i.,.".t:r."',! ....--.-t. ,.." ,-----...- ---~..--_. -----.- . -, .~ "-' o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE 1\TnU'omh~1'"' ." . 1~9~ ITEM NO. Recycling Report 4 . BY: DEPARTMEND l~~ ,?eRuyter AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ORIGINATING Planning REQUEST The Andover City Council is asked to review and approve the plans for the Andover Recycling Center building. Please review also the purchase of curbside recycling bins. BACKGROUND Menard's had the lowest prices for materials. The price of $2755.00 will be good through November 25th. I think that this will include most everything. H. L. Becker Construction gave the lowest quote of $3350.00 for construction of the building. This price does not include winter costs. Frank will level building site and do grading. Gary Shay/Merle prochniak of Homeland Products are giving us prices on curbside bins and park containers. They have been researching new containers styles that are available. Funds are available from the Recycling program. Additional funds will be available for the bins in next years Recycling Budget. COUNCIL OPTIONS 1. The Andover City Council may award the bid for the construction of the Recycling Center to H. L. Becker Construction Incorporated in the amount of $3,350. The Council may also authorize the purchase of materials from Menards. 2. The Andover City Council may choose to not award the bids. 3. The Andover City Council may table the item for further consideration. MOTION BY o TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY 08/30/89 ;;/A '-/ {, ~~ti-~ MAS T E R M A T E R I All 1ST PAG~ 30 . _ MASTER Stc;t) 192-1874 24)(2.4~~:I~TE1ENL ~~\1li - _-_5'" OQTY UNIT SIZE USAGE DESCRIPTION '_q _._.2..._RDU__..6"X5C' FOAM SILL SEAL 3 ElCH lX4 X 16'-0. TREATED BOTTOM PLATE 4 EACH 2X4 X S'-O" TREATED BOTTOM PLATE _r....~___.. .~.__._....,e.,A.CH. _2X~ ~ .16--0"_ TOP. PLATE~ ~ 8 EACH 2X4 X S'-O" TOP PLATES ~ 81 EACH 2X4 X 92 5/8" 16" OIC PRECUT STUDS ___ ._._~J. _ qS~CH._.~~....'~O" 4/12 SrD TRUSSES (CUT TO I' OH) 2 EACH 24'-0" 4/12 END TRUSSeS .. 4 EACH 2X4 X 14'-0" lATERAL BRACES .~:_ __ ..2.a.. _._.._.~A.tJ:L_..,-~ _. . RA!=TER Tt~S " 2 EACH 11 118" X 16'-9 MICRO-LAM OVERHEAD DOOR HEAD~R .. 1 EACH 2X6 X 10'-0" WINDOW HEAD'::R "_._..____-.1_.._.......E.ACH__2.X6..X .s'-O". __. DOOR HEADER .. _g 21 SHT 1/16" X ~, X 8' WAFERBOARD ROOF SHEATHING - 78 EACH 7/16" H-CLIPS ~:. ____ _. _.2__ .' _ROLL . S~IlIIGlE UNDER.tAYMENT .'. 22 BOl" FIBERGLASS SHINGLES - 11 PC 10'/PC STYLE 0 ROOF EDGE :..~.. .. .....1 . _. E~.Ct1._19x7 _' RAISED PA"-IEl OVERl-IEAD DOOR .' 1 PC 1 X6 X 16'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR fll.AME 1 PC lX6 X 14'-0" OVERHEAD DQ9~ FKAME .'... _...1 ._.PC__ ...IX4 .X ..16'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR .STOP .~ 1 PC IX4 X 14'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR STOP 33 FOOT 1 ~ 17' 1 a 16 BPICK MOULD __ 1 .._.EAr: H..__ <: '-8 ..Xb' - 8" _..P 1 S TE EL ENTRY 0 DOll. 1 EACH 46"X20")/ f- IHttiE ALUM UTILI TY WINDOW 8 SHT 1/2" X 4' X S', 3 .PLY cox PLYWOOD CORNER BRACE .1b__ . SHT 1/2" X 4' X.S' INSULATED SHEATHING 76 EACH DBl 5" X 12' ~E VINYL SIDING 8 EACH 10'IPC STARTER STRIPS 10 EACH _314" X _..wHITE J TRIM 5 EACH 12'-6" WHITE FINISH TRIM 4 EACH 10'/PC WHITE OUTSIDE CORNER POST ..1_ .. EACH \\s NAP lOCK PUNCH 4 PC 1X6 X 14'-0" 1\7<-.$TO PINE FACtA 4 PC lX6 X 12'-0" ~\ STD. PINE FACIA 4 .?J:. ll'/PC WHITE ALU!1INU,"" FREIrE MOULO 9 PC lZ'/PC ~E ALUMINUM 6" FACIA . 36 PC 12" PC . ~E ALUMINUM 16" SOFFIT PANE < .___....1 EACH EN.TRYLOCKSET W/ Z '3/4" 8ACKSET 40 La 16D CC SINKERS 40 L3 80 CC SINKERS 1 Ll3 160 GALV CAS INGNAILS_ 25 lB 1" GALV ROOFING NAILS 20 lB 1 1/2" GAlV ROOFING NAILS SHEA.THING 25. LB 2" GALV ROOfING NAILS - SIDING 2 BOX 1# WHITE AlUfoI NAllS 3 EACH 11 ~z. lATEX CAULK ;.':.. .__t._.. EACH 1 GAl/PAIL PLASTIC ROOF CE_I'IENT f.;O MMl~05 I b /1 E"c.(.Vf!.. ITE"! SKU 161-1605 109-5072 101:1-5030 .102-1143 102-1101 102-1091 187-1306 187-1322 102-1130 227-1646 102-5071 102-1701 1 02-1758 124- 27V~ 227-1002 151-17SCl lS1-Z7ag 155-1134 4z"S-1l72 103-1159 103-1146 103-1052 103-1049 417-1032 411-5.690 _ 403-2155 123-1085 163-1009 144-1008 144-1040 144-1105 144-1134 144-1079 144-1189 103-1146 103-1133 157-1402 ._ 157-1567 157-1499 221-4580 229-1244 229-1202 229-14Q4- 229-1600 229-1642 22<:)-1684 _ 157-1664 ,-'0 563-1047~~ 153-1248W ~/r, ;;l., ~~(), /' / / - <t:J> ~}7~2..t::17 ~ :',~ '" v !1J-""sse.s II ( ./f? ., ,. VV S- o _..; -4i .. )-' - " .- ...., ___*L.t. .5 ~ .,. I ~ .. ~' . ~ :': '." ....1 ' '. ~,,~~ ... ;r~{ ~1- t? . ~.J "'''--081:30/8-9 MAS T E R J. '.f.; I: ;:~};:I'_ _ H~STeR S\l;t) 192-1874 " f-~i:~rj' " '~I QTY UNIT SIZE USAGE DESCRIPTION ;"(t~,. _....2... ..R.Ot.L___.6".X 50-!~ FOAM SILL SEAL ';;' 3' E4CH 2X4 X 16'-0" TREATED BOTTOM PLATE ..... > 4' EACH lX4 X S '-0" TREATED BOTTOM PLATE ':.1; r ';':'___0'_' 8 E~.C.!i...ZX:4 X 16'-0",. TOP. PLATES ';,1'. 8 EACH 2X4 X 8 '-0" TOP PLA res p" 81 EACH 2X4 X 925/8" 16" O/C PRECUT STUDS .I~::_ ...._1..1... ..~~CH.._.24._'-O.. 4/12 STD TRUSSES (CUT TO i:':; Z EACH 24'-0" 4/12 END TRUSSES j," 4 EACH 2X4 X 14'-0" LATERAL BRACES "112' .__z.~ ':~"'~:~~'il1l8" x 16.'-9 ~~~~~~L~~=~VERHEAD DOOR HEADeR . ;"i 1 '. EACH 2X6 X 10'-.0" WINDOW HEAD'::R IL-~~.... .,.___1..._ ......EACH _ .2.X6..X .8 '-0" . DOOR H.EADER ... ji,g 21 SHT. 7/16" X 4' X 8' WAFERBOARD ROOF SHEATHING ,':, 78 EACH 7/16" H-CLIPS .~~~.___ ,.2_ .._ROLL. SHI"lGLE UNDERLAYMENT I" 22 BOL FIBERGLASS SHINGLES . :.~ 11 P C 1 0 ' I P CST Yl E 0 ROOF E DG E ,~.1 .....1. _. EACH... 1~X7 RAIseD PA~EL OVERHEAD DOOR 1 PC lX6 X 16'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR FRAME 1 PC 1X6 X 14'-0" OVERHEAD DQQ~ FRAME ...1 . PC ...1X4 .X ..16'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR STOP 1 PC 1X4 X 14'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR STOP -33 FOOT 1 ~ 17' 1 a 16 BP.ICK MOULD 1__.EACH...2!-g"X6'-S" ...PI STEEL ENTRY DOOR 1 EACH 46"X20" Rl'ov....'\f.lHttTE' HUM UTILITY WINDOW .8 SHT 1/2" X 4' X 8~ 3 PLY COX PLYWOOD CORNER 8RACE' 16 __. .SHT 1/2" X 4' X.8' INSULATED SHEATHING -76 EACH DBl S" X 12' I W-H-H"E VINYL S 101 NG 8 EACH 10'/PC I STARTER STRIPS 1 0 E ~ C H _31 It" X 12' -6" i ....wHIT E J T RIM 5 EACH 12'-6" i WHITE FINISH TRIM i 4 EACH 10' IPC II WHITE OUTS IDE CORNER POST .1. .. EACH I SN~PLOCK PUNCH 4 PC lX6 X 14'-0" :~'\"'-STO PINE FACtA 4 PC lX6 X 12'-0" STD. PINE FACIA 4 re. 12'/PC WHITE ALU~INUM FREIZE MOUL3 9 PC 12'/PC ~E ALUMINUM 6" FACIA I_ 36 PC 12" PC ~E ALUMINUM 16" SOFFIT PANE , . i. '-'-'-", .1 EACH ENTRY . LOCKSET WI 2 314" BACKS!:'T . ,. 40 L3 16D CC SINKERS 40 Lg 80 CC SINKERS ., 1 L g 16 D GAL II CAS I NG N A I L S 25 LB 1" GALli ROOFING NAILS 20 LB 1 112" GALV ROOFING NAILS SIlE4THING. 25. LB 2" GALV ROOFING NAILS - SIDING 2 B:JX 1# WHITE ALUM NAILS 3 EACH 11 OZ. LATEX CAULK ._~: ._ . EACH 1 GAl/PAIL PLASTIC ROOF CE/'lENT o o .~ . .,~. {" .,-r j ~:. . . ~ ; ~ , ; ~ -. . ; ;."' i .; ; .~. , 1. :', i!... [.i -'~ , ~}-\ ~O~ ~'1.LJ/ . ~'-'0- .. . I . ."~'" .....>., '.; ... .' . 1j. ... '.~. J" .: ...,....... ~ ; ..:- .... '"" . . k.... ~ ...... ':: J'. ..:....t~.: ~j ,:::.....;..' . /" -- ft.~~ ~'r::::::::::::.LW~ ~'Y ' ~ ; ~~ . I.".'.. , /"0 f2~Y-~ ( . . t:;.;, .'. MAT E ~ I ALL 1ST PAGE 30': " -,'.' ~ . , - -' H. L. BECKER CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONTRACTOR ROUTE 2. BOX 62 BETHEL. MINNESOTA 55005 TELEPHONE 753-1296 Pr~.eos~l D v~~ ~O ~ '}?- Proposal No. FROM Sheet No. Proposal Submitted To Date I I ;;'/"8 '7 Work To Be Performed At Name Street City '--. ;'0.1 :::> :::.;;J '1 Street City Date of Plans Architect State Tt;, 1 ..t I' Al . ""r j,I /.-' JI. 10 J perform all the labor necessary for the completion of We hereby propose I . I "II .1._ , Jc.I'" ~t..J ,d.:v~".A l2- o CL<:> -!r'~ (<) 1 /'~'7-' ... (~ II V .,., ,.~J..... ~ ....-? -~-- ...... d ' "" 4/ ,";-b-AO <.i /t..i) L> q..o_/\..L1-,~ 6~ ~~"':..I (.: (i ~) All material is guaranteed to specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and /> specifications/> ?ubmitted for qbovll work and completed in. a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of --r! --r i' . 1'-? ./1 .i'. ~ -r '/T:- "'0/ <? 00 ~_...0'v<:...&':"" '"".t-r.~.;;.,o.a...""-"1 _-<rO ~.,...~...u{. T,.r:...r~1'f //.:;; ---Oollars ~~.;:>- 0 - ). with, payments _.10 be made as fallows: '/1 I \",v.~~~"""""-"-"I ':;'0 _- . . /../ ,;ur;"7i.l?..-;-L./- ~ -~ ~~_ (2s~'1Y,d~ _ , A I -:"3 ".> '5D --- ---r- f) ; . .,-- ,,:;:........./...-'\ .(i)t!:.. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary rS7.e up,~ above.:work. '1Prkmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by 1... -. 1.,."lJ'-dvt ~ I . /7 ,;;;' 1,1 I ,; -r-' //. . ~ ~~....,_'._9-t::!.J._~ _..-: ,?~ ,...J'Z1 "/ J /' .--- /~....-.!/L- ~~7...;t-/ Respectfully submitted .. / ~/ I' <..P' ~/> Per Note - This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within ..3 cJ days ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions ore satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Accepted Signature Dote Signature f. o AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Commission 5 . Open Burning ITEM NO. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE T\T<:l"elllb9r Jl, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Fire Department APPROVED FOR AGE. N..I~., , '''ep BY: Joyce Noyes BY:. . vJ;: . I called the PCA and Jackie Deneen, who is in charge of open burning, said the 600 foot rule, which is a State Statute, is to be strictly enforced. She said that with a burn site so close there is no reason to allow burning less than 600 feet. . MOTION BY o TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o ~. " . .... '.'~.. .,,:. ~!. o r' \ ..' ( AIR POLLUTION COr.'"TROL RULES CHAPTER EICHT: APC 8 APe 8 Open Burning (a) Definitions As used in this regulation the following words shall have the meanings defined herein. (1) "Approved waste burner" means an incinerator or other burner constructed of fire resistant material having a capacity of not less than three bushels, a cover which is closed when in use, and maximum openings in the top or sides no greater than one inch in diameter. (2) "Building material" means lumber. wood shakes and other wood products but shall not include composite shingles, tar paper, insulation, wall board, wiring or other similar smoke producing materials, (3) "Diseased shade tree" means any tree infected by Dutch elm disease or oak wilt disease or any tree constituting a hazard to a disease control program established by the Department of Agriculture pursuant to Minn. Stat, ~ 18.023. (4) "Disposal facility" means a facility or site permitted by the Minne- sota Pollution Control Agency for the intermediate or final disposal of solid waste. (5) "Garbage" means discarded material resulting from the handling, processing, storage, preparation, serving and consumption of food. (6) "Metropolitan Area" means the area included within the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington. (7) "Open Burning" means the burning of any matter whereby the resultant combustion products are emitted directly to the atmosphere with- out passing through an adequate stack, duct, or chimney. (8) "Refuse collection service" means a public or private operation engaged in solid waste collection and transportation. (9) "Rubbish" means nonputrescible solid waste, such as paper, card- board, yard clippings and other natural matter not including garbage. (10) "Wetland" means natural marsh where water stands near, at or above the soil surface during a sigDificant portion of most years, (b) Open Burning Restrictions No person shall cause, suffer, allow or permit open burning. (c) Exemptions (1) In unincorporated areas where no refuse collection service is avail- able, the open burning of mbbish originating from single residential premises may be conducted in approved waste burners, (2) In any city where no refuse collection service is available, the local unit of government may apply to the Director for permission to allow the open burning of rubbish originating from single residential premises in approved waste burners. (3) Refuse collection service shall be deemed available as delineated in the County Solid Waste Management Plan, as adopted by the county and approved by the Agency. (d) Prohibition of Salvage Operations by Open Burning (1) No person shall conduct, cause or permit salvage operations by open burning. (2) No person shall possess, transport' or process motor vehicles or scrap metals which have been reduced by open burning or incineration in o o Alll POLLUTION CONTROL RULES APe 8 (; a device or equipment which has not received an Operating Permit from this Agency. (e) Open Burning by Permit Open burning may be conducted if an open burning permit is obtained pursuant to this regulation and the open burning is conducted in accordance with the requirements of this regulation and the conditions of the permit. (f) Permit Applications (1) Application. Application for open burning permits may be made in cases where fires are proposed to be set for the following purposes: (aa) Bona fide instruction and training of fire fighting personnel and for the testing of fire extinguishing equipment. (bb) Elimination of fire or health hazards which cannot be abated by any other practicable means. (ccl Activities in accordance with accepted forest or game manage- ment. (dd) Ground thawing for utility repair and construction. (ee) The disposal of trees, brush, grass and other vegetative matter in the development of land and right-of-way maintenance, (if) The disposal of diseased shade trees. (gg) The disposal of trees and brush in areas outside the Metro- politan Area. (bh) Activities in accordance with accepted agricultural practices. (il) The disposal of building material generated by construction. OJ) The disposal of building material generated by the demolition ( of non-commercial or non-institutional structures. (2) Restrictions. A burning permit shall be issued on a prescribed form to the applicant if the burning is for one of the purposes set forth in subsection (f)(1) and the applicant agrees that all burning shall be con- ducted under the following circumstances: (aa) The prevailing wind at the time of the burning shall be away from nearby residences. (bb) The burning shall be conducted as far away as practical from any highway or public road and controlled so that a traffic hazard is not created. (cc) The burning may not be conducted during the duration of an air pollution alert, warning or emergency. (dd) The recipient of the permit or his authorized representative shall be present for the duration of any fire authorized by the permit. (ee) Prior notice shall be given to the local Department of Natural Resources Forest Officer, local fire marshal, or local fire chief of the time and location of any fire authorized by the permit. (if) Open burning for ground thawing shall be conducted in accor- dance with the following additional restrictions: (i) Fuels and starting materials shall be of a kind which do not generate appreciable smoke. (il) Coke used for ground thawing within 500 feet of dwellings or occupied buildings shall contain less than 1 % sulfur. (iii) Ambient air quality standards for sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide shall not be exceeded at occupied residences other than those located on the property on which the burning is being conducted. ( '-- o > --~. J, o .I .~ r , .:-)>, ( \. J: A.IR POLLtrrlON CONTROL RULES APe 8 (iv) Propane gas thawing torches or other devices causing m;nim91 pollution shall be used when practicable. '$v;iin(gg) 'Open burning 0f materials pursuant to paragraph (f)(l)(ee), (1f), (gg), (hh), (ii), "and OJ) shall be conducted in accordance with the following additional restrictions: ". (i). The location of the burning shall not be within 600 feet of an occupied residence other than those located on the property on which the burmng is conducted. (ii) Oils, rubber and other similar smoke producing materials shall not be burned or used as starting materials. (ill) The burning shall not be conducted within one mile of any airport or landing strip, unless approved by the Director. (hh) Open burning of materials pursuant to paragraph (f)(l)(ii) shall also only be conducted under controlled burning methods approved by the Director. (ii) The burning is conducted under such other reasonable conditions as the permit issuing authority may impose. (3) Permit Issuers. In addition to the Agency, the following persons are authorized to accept applications and issue open burning permits: (aa) A Department of Natural Resources forest officer for locations within his jurisdiction. (bb) A local Department of Natural Resources Fire Warden for loca- tions within his jurisdiction. (cc) Upon approval of the Agency, a local pollution control agency for locations within its jurisdiction, (dd) A person(s) designated by the county board of commissioners and approved by the Director for locations within the county but outside the corporate limits of cities within the county. (eel. Upon the approval of the Director, either a fire chief or a person designated by a township or city for locations within the jurisdiction of said governmental unit. (ff) A Regional Director of the Agency or an employee of the Agency authorized by the Director, who may in their discretion refer the applicant to a local permit issuing authority. (4) Permit Denial. Any permit application submitted pursuant to this regulation shall be denied if: (aa) A reasonable, practical alternative method of disposal of the material is available. (bb)A nuisance condition would result from the burning. (5) Permit Revocation. Any permit is subject to revocation at the dis. cretion of the Director, a Department of Natural Resources Forest Officer, the local fire marshal or fire chief, or the permit issuer, if: (aa) A reasonable practical method of disposal of the material is found; (bb) A fire hazard exists or develops during the course of the burn- ing; or (cc) Any of the conditions of the permit are violated. (g) Liability. Exemption to conduct open burning or the granting of an open burning permit under any provisions of this regulation does not excuse a person from the consequences, damages or injuries which may result therefrom. (h) Conflicting Laws. Nothing in this regulation shall be construed to o AIR POLLUTION CO"'TROL RULES ""APC 8 allow open burning in those areas in which open burning is prohiDited by other laws, regulations or ordinances. .(i) Recreational Fires. .,Fires set for 'recreational, ceremo~!fooa prep- arati?n, or social purposes are permitted provided onlYwood,~a;<i:It.ehar-f coal IS burned. . c' .,;,.':""f"" '" 0> Diseased Shade Tree Open Burning Sites. Open burning of diseased shade trees shall be permitted provided no reasonable 'alternate method of disposal exists as determined by the Agency, a permit is obtained pursuant to this regulation, and the open burning is conducted in accordance with the requirements of this regulation and the conditions of the permit. (1) Site Location. The sites shall be located in accordance with the following conditions or as approved by the Director of Air Quality: (aa) Not less than 1,000 feet from an occupied building. (bb) Not less than 1,000 feet from a public roadway. (ee) Not less than one mile from an airport or landing strip. (dd) Not less than 300 feet from a stream. (ee) Not within wetland, (2) Site Preparation. The site shall be prepared in accordance with the following: (aa) Access to the site shall be controlled by a gate which shall be locked when an attendant is not on duty. ' (bb) Approach roads to the disposal site and access roads on the site shall be maintained so that they shall be passable at all specified times. (ee) A permanent sign identifying the operation indicating the hours and days the site is open for use, rates, the penalty for non-conforming dumping and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site entrance. (dd) Surface water drainage shall be diverted around and away from the operating area and ash storage areas. (3) Site Operation, The site shall be operated in accordance with the following conditions: (aa) Only diseased shade trees and! or tree trimmings shall be disposed of on the site. (bb) Qualified personnel for general direction and operation of the site shall be on duty at all times while the site is open for use and for the duration of any fire on the site. . (cc) Burning shall be conducted only when weather conditions are such that a nuisance, health or safety hazard will not be created, (del) Prior notice shall be given to the local fire authority of the time and duration of each fire. (ee) Adequate dust control shall be provided on the site and on the roads leading to the site. (ff) Ash residue shall be collected on a periodic basis and disposed of in an Agency-permitted sanitary landfill. (4) Site Termination. The site shall be terminated in accordance with the following: (aa) All materials extraneous to the site shall be removed and disposed of in an appropriate manner. (bb) The site shall be returned to a state equal to its surroundings. [July 7, 1969; amended Jone 5, 1970; amended September 14, 1971; amended March 12, 1976; amended May 13 1976] ..~ "c,',>.,:;,' '::.;.....~;,..~:..-: "',C.. o c c t. o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE November 21. 1989 AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Fire Department APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM Fire Department Request: NO. 6. BY: V. Vo1k BY: Representatives of the Fire Department will be present to request the following items: * Approval for a house burn. * Authority to issue violation tags. * Ability to use two donations ($750 and $100) to purchase an exhaust fan. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY o TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Nnu'::'mh~r '1 . 1 QRQ AGENDA SECTION Staff, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROV~ NO. Committee, Commission Planning Blak~~ AGENDA ITEM Personnel Committee NO. Report Jay Planner BY: 7 . BY: n V The Personnel Committee met to discuss the position of Recycling Coordinator. The Committee recommended that the City create the position of Recycling Coordinator per the request of the Planning Department memo and that the position be contingent upon the continuation of adequate funding from the Metropolitan Council through Anoka County. MOTION BY o TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY (- (~ ~ CITY of ANDOVER b MEMORANDUM TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jay Blake, Cindy DeRuyt r september 19, 1989 Revised 1989 Recycling Budget Please review the following proposed budget for the recycling program. The budget includes $5,820 of base funds that must be ~sed before December 31, 1989 and also 1989 funds of $6,320 for a total of $12,140. The following items have been added or included: 1.. The addition of a permanent part time Recycling Coordinator at $7.50 per hour and 16 hours per week. See the enclosed job description. The position would include pro-rated benefits not including health coverage. 2. Recycling Day II on October 14, 19S9 is included in the budget at $750. In~une, the City spent more than $1,100, however, fewer paid staff and more volunteers will be utilized this time. 3. City pamphlets are being printed. The costs associated with the brochure are included in the budget. 4; The City will be sponsoring a drop-off center in December. Goodwill Inc. will assist. 5. Staff is recommending that the city utilize recycling funds to pay for the maintenance of the paper drop-off site at Bill's Superette. These costs are also included in the budget. 6. Staff is preparing a grant for a pilot office paper recycling program (one of the first in the Twin Cities) with the City and Andover Elementary School. Most of the costs associated with the pr9gram would be covered with the grant from Anoka County. Depending on how successful the program is, some costs are being held in a contingency for this program. o .~ o ( ( 1989 REVISED GENERAL RECYCLING BUDGET CITY OF ANDOVER CODE DESCRIPTION 101 121 122 Salaries PERA FICA 200 322 330 351 Office Supplies Postage Transportation Publishing (Pamphlets) ~pecial Projects Recycling Day Pilot Paper Recycling Program December Goodwill Drop-off Center COSTS $1,560 $ 67 $ 118 $ 145 $ 75 $ 70 $1,_200 $ 750 $ 500 $ 167 GENERAL PROGRAM FUNDS AVAILABLE ./. ~"'" 'i '.o.J "'. 1988 Interim Funds (Must be spent) 1989 Base Funds pilot Paper Recycling Program Grant (Grant to be submitted) , \(.':':- l~ I '2..., t'+-O . r c.~ ...!--t IC,j""- . ':;', :..zr.'[~~ ...-- , .-.~ t-. 1$5,820;:::- lj6,320 ~.2-rO 0 O. 1989 - 1990 CAPITAL PROGRAM SUMMARY Recycling Drop-off Center Building Recycling Containers $6,360 $5,200 CAPITAL PROGRAM FUNDS AVAILABLE City Capital Improvements Program Anoka County Drop-off Center Grant (Grant application to be submitted) " . ,. '~--'._'-- $11,560 $ 5,000 12 \ IL[' .............:!....:.;; --"7 A <:?C>',\ r"GO -' ~ ~." ...,-,....~.._..,..-' I.4\.~J(~ C4.kd ...... , ~a5. 9 c ( (- CITY OF ANDOVER POSITION DESCRIPTION PbSITION TITLE: Recycling Coordinator DEPARTMENT: Planning Department ACCOUNTABLE TO: City Planner, City Administrator SCOPE OF JOB Under the supervision of the City Planner, the Recycling Coordinator will oversee development of the recycling program for the City of Andover, including long-range planning, day to day monitoring of recycling goals and accomplishments and promotion of recycling programs in Anoka County. . PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES Maintains updated recycling pamphlet and informational items for distribution to Andover residents. Develop a series of recycling long-range options and goals for City Council review and approval. Researches recycling efforts from other communities and compares efficiency and costs. Receives and answers citizens' phone calls and letters requesting recycling information. Coordination of City Recycling Days. Maintains appropriate City files. Prepares summary memos and appropriate graphics for the City files and other related duties as assigned. Department Head Jay Blake ?t~ Effective Date , September 19, 19S9 o / ( MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS A combination of training and/or experience substantially equivalent to the following: - Bachelors Degree in Planning or related field and/or - Significant course work in Environmental Studies, Geography, Urban Studies or related fields. '" o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE November 21, 1989 AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM Election Equipment NO. BY: V. Volk BY: 8 I recently attended a meeting at the Blaine City Hall regarding the optical scan voting equipment. The majority of the cities in Anoka County have chosen to proceed with the purchase of this equipment for the 1990 election through a joint powers agreement. Attached are two price quotes from BRC and unisys. We were informed that the price for the units will increase significantly by 1992. I need to know what Council wishes to do so that we can either be included in the joint powers agreement or wait until 1992 to change over. COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY MOTION BY o TO . OUNISYS Ci ty of Blaine unisys ES-2000 Configuration am Pricing The prices quoted are list prices and do not reflect the prices to be used in a canpetitive bidding situation. We ask that you use these for list price canparisons only. 1lCCU-VOl'E Ballot processing Unit Pricing Oeser iption Number of Units purch. Price On-site 1\nnual Maint. Central Annual Maint. Style Number ESl-AV ACCU-VOTE Uni t* <10 10 - 99 100 - 249 250 - 499 $464 /unit $232 /unit 6,200 5,704 5,270 4,960 * InclLrles the Optical Scan Reader, Ballot Box, aOO Precinct ID Memory Card. o R r-"r" "-,, L.v":i it' r:.~ Business Records Corporation Election Services Division 32S SOUTH JEFFERSON STREET CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60606-5614 OCT 2 3 1989 CITY OF ~[t,11~-1475 October 20, 1989 Joyce Twistol, City Clerk City OI Blaine 9150 Central Avenue, NE Blaine, MN 55434 Dear Joyce, As a result of your recent meeting and discussion with Geoff Ryan, Business Records Corporation is pleased to provide you with a proposal for the Optech voting system. The attached proposal provides a group-incentive purchase plan and takes into consideration your existing election equipment. In order to take advantage of this opportunity and to "lock-in" the reduced unit price of the Optech, we will need a commitment from election jurisdictions in Anoka County prior to December 15, 1989. Joyce, as you are undoubtedly aware, approximately 1,000 Optech units are being utilized in over 75 Minnesota election jurisdictions. We hope that we will have the privilege to continue to serve your election related needs. Please let us know how we can assist you in your decision making process. . \.~~cerelY, 7 r; TJ (L( \V//r ~V'/<-r I Larryc14andel Regional Sales Manager Ll1:ds Attachments cc: Geoff Ryan o rr----- o o ~ Page 1 OPTECH VOTING SYSTEM (units) 1-25 101-250 51-100 26-50 Optech IIIP w/metal ballot box @$6.500 @$6.250 @$5.950 @$5,650 (Additional memory packs are $315.00 per unit). The price of the Optech units is predicated on a "group" purchase and reflects quantity discounted prices. The price includes the following support services for the the first election: * Precinct election official training program * Assistance in developing and implementing a voter education program * Pre-election media conference * Ballot layout and design * On site support for the public test * Toll free telephone support * Municipal Clerk and election department personnel training. To maximize efficiency and to facilitate training multiple election jurisdictions, BRC will schedule and conduct consolidated training programs. Business Records Corporation. Election Services Division o o ~ Page 2 YQI!Mg_~QQItl~_~MQ_~M~!kk~BX_~Q~!e~~MI Model VI Self-Contained Voting Booth with Light $175. 00/each Metal Ballot Transfer Case $ 65.00/each Nylon Optech Carrying Case $ 50.00/each Voting booths should be allocated .t approximately one (1) unit per 200 voters or the equivalent of your existing supply of punch card voting devices. IBAQ~=!M_~Q~!e~~MILYAk~~ Business Records Corporation is willing to provide any municipality in Anoka County with the following credit or trade- in on their current election equipment: . $87.50 credit on a Model IIIA/P Votomatic unit equipped with a Model I punch card vote recorder $10.00 credit on any punch card vote recorder only - $2,000.00 credit on an ELPAC tabulation system consisting of a Card Reader, Computer and PFinter *Business Records Corporation will provide any Anoka County election jurisdiction with one (1) new Model VI voting booth, proposed herein, for two (2) used Model IIIA Votomatic/Vote Recorders. Business Records Corporation. Election Services DIvision :! o o ~ Page 3 ~~Qg~A~~!Hg Should Anoka C04nty decide not to purchase the Election Management System (EMS) from Business Records Corporation in 1990, and therefore, not be in a position to provide programming for the Optech users, Business Records Corporation will provide the service. Business Records Corporation will program the Optech memory packs at a cost of $350.00 per election. This is a gH~~~~~~~2 flat rate for every Optech user in Anoka County. gQH2Y~A~bg_QeIggH_gbggI!QH_2Y~eb!g2 * Marking. Pens 0. 59/each Absentee Pencils 0. 07/each * Secrecy Folders 0. 45/each Printer Ribbons $2. 85/each Optech Printer Paper $1. 50/roll Plastic Padlock Seals $12.00/per 100 Cardboard Transfer BOKes $4.50/each *Reuseable supply items Business Records Corporation. Election Services Division o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION November 21, 1989 ITEM 9. NO. Date to Reconvene Budget Hearing DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance Howard Koolick ~ Finance Director BY: API~~..' VED FOR AG i\Ii.A \~ . BY: \., AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Items REQUEST The Andover city Council is requested to approve December 6th, 1989 as the date for reconvening the public budget hearing. BACKGROUND At the last regular City Council meeting, November 29th was set as the date for the public budget hearing. Due to oversight, a date was not set for reconvening this hearing if needed. December 6th is recommended since it is one week later and through phone calls to each council member, it is a date all councilmembers could attend. For your information, I have enclosed a copy of the advertisement which appeared in the Thursday, November 16, 1989 Community section of the Minneapolis Star Tribune. MOTION BY o TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY . o o , " 'f'" " : "" " . ~.: . '.. '.NOtjCE,;tOALL~.tITIZEMSOF AMBO,VER:: '. . '. . . ' . . , "~:r l1: J ,~.;. . ":' . PROPOSE~INCREASEIN P'ROPERTYTAXESFOR 1990. ...: :" i""I::' ,-:, -" ',:;'.':-; . . > . .- <:,.>.. ' .. ~- The City of Andover is proposing to increase total property", taxes to be collected for 1990 by 34.15 percent over 1989 ~ taxes. . . ::: " ,. ,. ,.Totalamount proposed: $1,~49,942' . . , . . , . , ..' . ',,' . " - '. '". { This increase is not necessarily due to a decision by the City~: . Council to increase spending. The State of Minnesota has .;' shifted aid from cities to school districts, and. ,thus 26.51 n percent of the tax increase is due to a decrease in' state aid to ~f Andover. ..... .' . :: " . . '. ' , - ~ .' ... , ~~ This amount: is a proposal only . All citizens of Andover are ~ invited to attend a public hearing where the. City Council will - discuss the proposed increase. The City Council will vote to approve or disapprove this amount' at the' hearing. Please. come and give the Council your opinions on this proposal. '. . . . . . . .' PUBLIC HEARING. .' DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 1989 .. HOUR: 7:3~ ~ .M~' '::.' . . '. . PLACE: . CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS " . 1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD.. N.W. . \ANDOVER, MN 55304 If addi~i~nal ti'",e is needed the hearing ",,(11 berecoAed on December 6, at 7:30 p.m. in the same place. 11 . ..:' \ . Summaries of the City's Proposed 1990 Budget are available. for review in the Finance Director's office. Persons unable to . attend this hearing may send written' comments to the Council . . at the above~ddress. For more information; call the Finance" Director at 755-5100; 8-4:30, M-F. ..:'i ~ "'~ 'j, . . Aif~)";' ' o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE T\To"9qlper :U, 1999 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ~ APPROVED FOR A AGENDA SECTION NO. ITEM Approve Plans & NO. 10. Specs/Commercial Park pondin BY: BY: The City Council is requested to approve the resolution app' oving the plans and specs and ordering the ad for bid for Project 89-24, Andover Commercial Park Pond, after the Council approves the amended resolution described below. Attached is a letter from Good Value waiving the need for a public hearing. At the October 17, 1989 meeting we ordered the plans and specs but didn't order a public hearing. I would like to amend the resolution accepting the feasibility study, waiving the public hearing, ordering the improvements and preparation of plans and specs. This will put our process in order. The project is designed for Hidden Creek East only not designed for additional water from Andover Commercial Park. The City Council tabled this item November 7, 1989 because the waiver of public hearing letter from Good Value wasn't signed. Attached is a copy of the signed letter. Enclosure: Good Value Letter Amended Resolution accepting feasibility, ordering improvement, waiving public hearing and preparation of plans and specs. Resolution approving plans and specs. MOTION BY o TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY '1 r r GOOD ~VAUJE HOMES o :..-4 /),..,' t~''-t?'7;J/ t October 25, 1989 '"" ECnVEf U OeB 11989 U Mr. Jim Schrantz City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Anoka, MN 55303 CITY OF ANDOVER RE: Hidden Creek East Second Addition Dear Mr. Schrantz: This letter acknowledges Good Value Homes' willingness to waive the public hearing and accept the four cents per square foot assessment for area and trunk storm sewer in that part of Hidden Creek East Second Addition which drains into the city of Andover. Sincerely, . Peterson resident of Development /j Enclosure o GOOD VALUE HOMES. INC. . Registered Builder. 1460 93rd Lane N.E.. Blaine. MN 55434-4396 . Phone: (612) 780-5510 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. 174-89 AMENDED MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT 89-24 FOR STORM DRAINAGE IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 34. WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 17th day of October, 1989, order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and presented to the Council on the 17th day of October, 1989; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $21,750.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated total cost of improvements of $21,750.00, waive the Public Hearing and order improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. MOTION seconded by Councilman City Council at a Meeting this and adopted by the day of 19 ,with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor c:> Victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 89-24, ANDOVER COMMERCIAL PARK POND FOR STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 174-89 Amended, adopted by the City Council on the 17th day of October ,1989, TKDA has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 89-24 ror- Storm Drainage construction; and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 7th day of November ,1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the Final plans and Specifications . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 A.M. Monday November 20 , 19~ at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted day of by the City Council at a Meeting this ,19 ,with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk " o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE T\TQ"embIH Jl, 1999 Engineering i('S~ BY: AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM 11. NO. Receive Peti tion/ S camore & 1 BY: The city Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring the adequacy of the petition and ordering the preparation of a feasibility report for the improvement of streets, Moore's Estates, Project 89-25. Attached is the petition and a map of the area requesting the improvement. Based on assessable front footage, 76% of the footage has requested the improvement. Twenty-one lots benefit from the improvement, not including the city park and a 15 foot strip (owned by the City) located along Sycamore Street. Fourteen lots have petitioned for the improvement. MOTION BY o TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF PROJECT NO. 89-25 IN THE MOORE'S ESTATES/158TH STREET-REDWOOD STREET AREA. ORDERING PREPARATION STREET CONSTRUCTION, AVENUE NW-SYCAMORE WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated October 31 ,1989, requesting the construction of improvements; and WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The petition is hereby declared as adequate. 2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of ,19____ voting in voting with Councilmen favor of the resolution, and Councilmen against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk PROJECT 89-25 0 Assessable Properties That Front Footage Have peti tioned (Yes) PIN 14-32-24-44-0006 115 14-32-24-44-0007 100 14-32-24-44-0001 - ( ci ty owned) 15 14-32-24-44-0009 250 250 14-32-24-44-0005 250 250 14-32-24-44-0002 100 100 14-32-24-44-0008 94.75 14-32-24-44-0003 150 150 14-32-24-44-0004 250 250 14-32-24-44-0016 358.71 358.71 14-32-24-44-0015 - (west parcel) 200 200 14-32-24-44-0015 - (east parcel) 136 14-32-24-44-0013 135 135 14-32-24-44-0024 330 330 14-32-24-44-0012 260.99 14-32-24-44-0022 470 470 23-32-24-11-0017 117.53 117.53 23-32-24-11-0016 115 115 23-32-24-11-0015 105 23-32-24-11-0012 140 140 23-32-24-11-0013 100 23-32-24-11-0014 97.53 97.53 3890.51 2963.77 2963.77 = 76% 3890.51 City of Andover Park Assessable Front Footage 66 Feet o - , I 1 I I , I I I I I , J I I -r.- 1 , I ----- T:------- --- V,1' I {. -' ...............'.....'~~~ ..... ..... ......................... r-- '.....' ..... r', ,~~~~I // I' ~ 7" II .1" / ( \h '1"" "VI'. ". . ' !l " : CM",DI"'" Nd7 I I_- I ! I ..':----,---1---- --1..... I l~" I ~ .i ,.~~. h ~~...I I) ~ ~l ~" Ii Ii . :i ~ I ~ 1 ,] I .~ I Ii I! : j I .1 "" . I: I "" .t"t---- -----1--.- J! '\f..,^"(~ I ~ Ii "1 ~ 0: . I' 1'1'1'1 J'I " " .. I I ~ I , I ,. ,. I.J!J JS I I I!h:; ~M Irr~s $I .J I $ Z$ n r"; ~ $JtI /$ n n " zSI~ If 1i~" I Il(" 1 /l,{'0/ !iL'~J:J; I I. · · '4~ <<. 2' ::1:. : .Io(;WI. ~11I1".. I/.~ · :: ,).-'--(.1 71tl' " '):Jj."Q1 ~ '):F . at 7 I 3l'... ,/'LIO :0 17 . i . /I 21 9 , 1:, L.!..J;t= 117~ 'NI.. ,10 I a~ ~ 21 1-'': -"'{ Y......... 2 : II l 3 4 5 6 7" " V' ~5 :5 4 il:.r \:. Jill' " , . . of I J' 'll , ~:~ I ~ J ;7. r:?'tt r,:-,/ti. I - .-- J I J: , L.ll ! I-"",-"'"!! I-- , ; , , ~ -c ,....- .~ ---- I 'OJ.41c ~ -1'Q ~C1Jr' 'I" '113!1 1./2'1- ' · ri ' I - II ~ .A '. ~~:, r.~"'1 , Ir- ._- - : 1-- , If-- ;/' i i Ir- If-- ! I. . I J ~' .;.... LA.H J' ~ ~ IJI r-;-- of'" I TN AY I ~ J' , , -f- ,_, Co ~ ~ rt.a r+- I~,. -1 II I I , I 1 I I I I I .~ --- t-r- ~~ I ~ I . .. .... I.L-, , ~ T- ~/i'E , ~ I /O;KS - . j t I I . r" \ \ \ / , I II , I ~------- I rt...... / I,~. .. .~ " I ",,1t1.:~, ':\\ ,f-' BARNEs. kbl:l./N~ . 1-. 1 :.. · f' "if J "". I \ .____1 :: OAKS =;. 'ND~A~lJ.: \ 1.......... I I , ,I J i'- - I- _.L - t - L - .;:..;:-tv./ I I f:S2 -:.t:- I I, I Ie. Y/ . 1."'- r I I I .e ~. ~~ l Ii 1= r- ..... ~ .' I I i" I ~ CITY of ANDOVER Date: /6/3/ / 3Ci I I No. Gent~emen: - We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the fo~~owing described area: SyiA HaEe ST N\N t Z. , l~rfTH Ave. j\), w. , ~ f ,zDWOC D S';- I dpherebypetition that.said portion of said area be improved by Construction of City:.. . '.. 'V A \) I. N r-i"" and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. NO This petition was circu~ated by: Address: CITY of ANDOVER Date: No. Gent~emen: - We, the undersigned, area: S" I (' tJ wtOV'Q. ~ T I owners of rea~ property in the fo~~owing described t\}u) <J /~'? T H A V E N, W ~ f.i:P;,..ltJO) ~'r I do hereby petition that said portion of.said area be' improved by Construction of City:' t:> A \J , /IJ 1'. . . . . and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting pr9perty, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION YES NO This petition was circu~ated by: Address: - - .. - - - - -- - - - ... -'.. :~ -":7:' ..-.. -- .. ..-...,.....,.- . . ~,,::~~~;.;:::o:-~-:;;: . :~;~:-'~-:'i~r;:'~-'.~~~;; .., --- ;.:.-:;.:.;_-...... ,.~-,~,_:.:.~t. , . ~. . ...~~.:-.. .~~:~~~ ',:':- . ~ .;~-..._""". -:,""""" - .. -~..:.~;.- - .;".;,~;....;~_..... "'-0'0 1lIIlII'l:_~_~. .~ ..-...~~..- ~ -~ .. "'.-':---''''' <~~l~"'t~~~~= .' ~~"..~~ ,- J'r ^"..,..---..". r . ,. - - .~.. ".~ . . ~-~:~~~ -. I""V .:,-_....~~""-.......~-."" ---. - WIIllO'I }:3t~~~; ~'~.':"J: _.':"~~: .::,:~- I .. '- .. - -~ .. '<~""",-,,"""'~'- .~-- ":~:':';';;' r -. llOl' '. -".~.'-::;;; -' .. l .. l~ ill E ;::: ~ ~ 1 ~ g ~ i ~ ~ "= 14 .,. ~ I 3 ~ AW 0 /j.IST AVI.. H.w. 00. f :< ~ ~ I ilIQoO ~ ltJ ~ ~ " /606q /i .!!l ~ 9 ~- ~- !l; ...~ lilOflI t~z, r . i-- . M , R In ~ in ~ --- ~ ~ - -~-rV ;I: ~ l~ .. - ,,..so / ~ I~Z.' 19I1" 1~8"~ ( - I ",( 'bP I~ Ii ij .. - 15810 ~~ IS1IoC. ~ ~I .---..... - ---,". .--- .. -., .. ~~ . .~ ~ f ~ - .' ">'~".-~ 1$1~ ID Ifl'S/LJ:;;; on ;;; ,.. J I~ ~ ,.. ~)1'J! ~1 f~ ~ OJ I,,", f In "l ~ i .. J .~ $! - :> ~ ~# ""'" - " I ~ .,.... . """ . f;;;; oil " ...... f: ... ~ ~~ d~ ~ om , .. ~$ t /!%140 ~ ! l r-- I~ I Ii ill~l~ ~Imlr~f~ J ~ L " ~ i ~ -'-. J l!fZ! '- ~ -- - ~ 16~ ~ ~ " /6?>eO \ I ... ~ I~~ , .. 1~\\I~2>~ Ri aI 3 '. 24 - "I / ., - -, s '. -----. " .. 0 /6000 ~ '" N '- " ~~ ~ . J.!!t6 ...~~. .-r--T ~ y..' I , i ~\ i,k, ': I [ i m , i ~ :t.. I 6 (6) . ~ @ . I " ~ :~. ....:.. . '..1.. >- " t1- : :;e , ! . . : ; ~ , I~ ~.~. . ~...~ . . . .' - . ~ _...- .~".'::":':"~'~- I ~ o I: Ii I! x f9) /J?"'?<v ./ riifJ w 0::' ~1;).1. ~ {tlJ ~ c( ~ (;""J(f;iJ '" <:) \~9\ >- en ..... /(l2) i . . /(;1//.71 : Al./,..,. N .iIrM;""~'lIr~./ ... d.dZ~ .. : , . , , ..... ! .1 " . , ... : J' 1.1.0 ~ ~ , . (2"1) i ~ /f;) X ~t . "'Q~.~a " ~ AVE. N.W' ; , ~ . \ to- \. I __\\.1 (lO) ~~( 1'4) (902,) v' '/. ~ reotlf'l - '\$''11.4 )( ...- (03) <3 ("0) z o (8) (no) f;) t~ '" , , , , , , , , \..- ...~ . 'I ~ . ~ - ......... .. ~",' . ~.. .. \- . . , . - 1!:1 .......... , w. ~ . --- -... -"'- --.. _.... _._--~ - I ~ ,'/(l~"i , , :' (j/PJ : ~Mr .v. ,jz,~:'-~.ur(i-.J :' 8,I3Z-,<<: . , " : : ' '. . O. . .>.; \f)1W ~~ Y (2~ ._,~'- ~'I , ........ . I~'.......... ~ \'" ,.., t. ..~- - - ~-~=!" -..' .x v/" "~'"" -- , . . . , , ,', , , , , .' ....... .~ (6) @ .( ...... ::..::" i I' I. I I. , , , , , . , \". .:t. " I I I I ~~ I' I ~ ! I ......1: I '/-" I I '''t ~ I .J\ .:t; I I. " \" , . r :t: ........ ....J7/.;'J...... .....'" : --'~H-":" q1f"-"~#/.>r"~ I 1\ : ~ i 156 &/P'"/) (~) ~ .. n i ....:- ---- ~f.. '~I' i ! ~ ' I i &/n) f1} -+ \., I ! r I: , t.,. ~:_ ~ I: ~ I ....-/5' -7.u~ " --- f 1 : : ~ ~ ' ~456 ~ 1'\ ~5 j:) ~ : '~l.;::>~ .~ . , , , , ~ ,.J!J,.'J' . . . . . :~ '.. . . , , , (~") : ',\ " ~ (;) II 10 plJ ~ . (t.z) ... (J.1A:1J JI-';" I"'N"d.Nh~tJt \~...:'d'" '. , . ! '. 157 I'"; tzJ :9010) -+ to- I ~ I u~~L.. 1~ -77 ,IS. 1/ t514~ f4.J . 16110 (/11) ~61P. ~ T CD - I 1 ~.~: ~ ,... T ,. '..l > . I-t- I , ( Fr",1I. +- F.&>c-f"-g e C!AJ4t.1 a..f, '&> N .s , , , , . , , , I _f.. 1.1.0 , . , ., , "' ." . ..~i!."'''-'''. ... ^\/E-- t..LUL__ .: . ft'\ MY . Pt.,y;- _ ~ . .... /51 '18- (UJ) /51).b ~. ,;.... 0".-, I. - ~.. ,"II ; ; l~ ~~i , ..--I.~;~; . . %:~~f~;.!~~.~? . . l:YI.!,".I~ 'v ;'~ j'(f)f:'" ..(11'1 .:,"" ",,,':J:" ROI.i\Nn . . ; " , ff()A/T F,a:;r,-~ ~(c..u.lo-hof\5 . o. -4 THIS IS .. CC, THEY ""UF OFFICES J.FFE THIS DUWIN If.EFEIf.ENCE /It IS NOr: ~ES' CURACfE: E j~ / ~~. r)/ 6..17.955 589.,;:3..;'/.,:.... N.E. '--r r I ~ : I I 11) " t " I I ',' ./.... , I 1\., \ I 1';: \ I" <. ~ J .~ \ ,"' J r I~I I <:l I I~J /. I I _.r"' I~I ~ ~ . I ., -' '. ." I~I ,.' . .' l. L , \" t; ~-:..: L '," ---- .50 S4 ~ 1. (J) c.5 z '--' (8) i/) -- ~ :..0. , ~ , \ . " , / o ~ -.. -.., i.: I Edsr ...../ J ~ (9) "i ..lOJ.Tl.... :::: ..~9J.J~. ;.. \.., ;: ~ ~ "'''' J5YI ., '" . ~ .' " _.~ (~) . ~ o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Engineering ~ AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM Request Speed Study NO. 12. Moore Estates/158th Ave. Area BY: The City Council is requested to consider requesting a speed/traffic study in the Moore Estates/158th Avenue NW area. See attached diagram and petition from area residents. The area residents have also petitioned for blacktop for this area. It is recommended to include the cost of the signs into the project costs. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ~ ;; CITY of ANDOVER Date: 10 Is/ I Y9 { No. Gentlemen: - We, the undersigned. owners of real property in the following described area: S y c '" J..1.o e E ST N W ~ IS'/! oft, It~ IV, l/IJ do hereby petition thats~id por ion of s~id area be im Construction o.f City: ':-} e <1-(. .L\"",,~ t ' ~t f> \Ca and that the property, as " \. Sll"'-<' 01'1 ..J,/ca.v.r<O{(2 ~ 0"'- cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION NO This petition was circulated by: Address: -..... " "' ,. CITY of ANDOVER Date: No. Gent~emen: We, the undersigned, owners of rea~ property in the fo~~owing described area: S '}C iH-WeV ~T NLJ r ~ 1~'?H-t A V~ NW do hereby petition that said portion of said area be imp~oved.by Construction of City: <J f' &:-Il.- {J L i M t r S~ I ~4 '" G ....~~ v' c..~l..l~VQlA At. ~lo..6 ':':I~;^!-'> 0"'- <gt/c'-o..lIY1ov-e Si ~ 0111. 'S''l'fc,/tv-e)jlf/ and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. LEGAL YES NO o 1 This petition was circu~ated by: Address: - -- -- -- -- . -- - -- -- -- -- ::""'- - --"" -~::--- -- -- -...;. - -.:--j -- ~- ... - -~~ L - .J~ ~, ___A~ r:::I:::' i'r........ Di"'" /fO.y i ! I 1 0, ! I ",-1' I _~I ~~~,~ ----l-~-- , "'.. 1 --- _J ,I -- . Ii ,I . 11 ;.o~ 1.;-- ..~~ .. I l ",I L - ! o , - -- ! ---- ...- -- -- - 1J.i' i ..--, -"" I~ I I ! I I I ! - "-- I - -h I -L o I I I 1 I I - =.. I - - --- : I 1---1 ~ _I - o. o C\I :'10 .~ ( I '''OR.J~ ~.h. I -- : II T I I I !I - I I I _I o o e -----1--- : -- ~ 'I ! I' ',~"D' jI- LJ~' -,!I-- ~ '~ ,i r .' ... fI" I - '/ ,j;.j . . I - L;l ........ A ," ~'/ "'-'.:-~ ' L 7,u ,T. II ,~~ <7/ - ....-c 7'/ 1/ .................17 c: ............ ___ __ r-7I7'c,'.... - . - --- ty~ '~, ..' W ,~"" If' I - I ~~ --.: 1 - 'I " ! I q - _ --.J --- [----'- ~ ' ~. I , it , " , 9"'- _ _ -llt:-- . -I --=~ I 'oAic~ _ 'I, L - · ;Jf~C;~ -~I;7l l "'-= i:=:= - ~ 1 .. -~ '. ~ "'T~. , - ....!... '1" --l ..... ~ . 14 . 10 I V -;i 7;.fff L.! ;4 1;? ~ Nt- r." f ..!..)?! ~OjiVt I '-t-;;r;:rr ~ I .~t"t" ..... /Ii~ l Ilil 1 1/ '-.- " -fL- -' 1" ~I-l h -\. ~I- A ~l' 31' , ~ I/" . ,.,,' V -I ~~.. .__-9 : "I... J I 1,_ ....... I I L.. I I 1--1 I ~'1~-~ L . ' I 'L./ 70 I I · -' . OAKS' --1- -- 1 I r~l I f-.>- -- o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE T\l""'(j)'qIper 11, 1999 AGENDA SECTION NO. APP.IW. ~1 D .FOR AGEf'I~A ~\ BY: J j ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT T\ln.,_n~ ' n., Engineering ITEM NO. 13. Approve Engineering Rates/Bonestroo BY: 1<' , The City Council is requested to approve the proposed engineering rates for Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates for the year 1990. The rates are reasonable. I recommend approval. COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY MOTION BY e TO o n -. l\J1 Octo G. Bonestroo. P:E. Robert W. Rosene. PE. Joseph C. Anderlik. P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg. PE. Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, PE. Glenn R. Cook. P.E. Thomas E. NO)es, P.E. Robert G. SchuniCht, PE. Marvin L Sorvala. PE. Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects October 26, H89 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Anoka, MN 55303 Attn: Mr. James Schrantz Re: 1990 Rate Keith A. Gordon. PE. Richard VI. Foster. P.E. Donald C. Burgardt. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field. P.E. Michael T. Rautmann. P.f. Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E. David O. loslcota. P.E. Thomas W. Peterson. PE. Michael C. lynCh. P.E. James R. Maland. P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Mark R. Rolfs. P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus. P.E. Howard A. Sanford. P.E. Daniel J. Edgerton. P.E. Mark A. Seip. P.E. Philip J. Caswen, PE. Mark D. \.v.3l1is. P.E. Thomas R. Anderson, AJ.A. Gal}' F. Rylander. PE. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawefsky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin. c.P.A. R~O~~:9~iO CITY OF ANDOVER Honorable Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith are revised hourly Engineering Rates which are to be effective January I, 1990. We have limited the increase in our rates to less than 5.0 percent. We have appreciated our relationship with the City of Andover and we are all looking forward to serving you in 1990. If you have further questions on the enclosed rate schedule, please call. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ Otto G. Bonestroo OGB:mb Enc 1. o 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 . 612-636-4600 o o 1990 SCHEDULE B CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE Principal Engineer $57.75 $52.50 $42.50 $39.00 $35.50 $26.25 $26.50 $19.25 Registered Engineer/Architect Graduate Engineer/Architect/Field Supervisor Senior Draftsperson Senior Technician Technician Word Processor Clerical The above rates will be multiplied by 1.3 for review of private developers plans and inspection of private work to cover professional liability insurance costs and legal expense. Reimbursable Expenses - At Cost Reproduction, Printing, Duplicating Out-of-Pocket Expenses such as stakes, field supplies, telephone calls, etc. Mileage Andover