HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC October 17, 1989
o
o
****************************************************************
~~************************************************************~*
~ ~
~ ~
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
::___WH7AI~S___HAPPENING ?_ ::
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
<<~ **
~~ **
<<~ **
",'" October 17, 1989 **
",<< **
<<'" **
~ ~
",'" **
~ ~
:: N I had two calls from people on Lily ::
",'" street/Marigold street thanking the City for **
:: closing off Lily Street at the Coon ::
:: Rapids/Andover border. ::
<<<< **
:: Coon Rapids has an acceptable access to Round ::
",'" Lake Boulevard now so, Coon Rapids removed the **
:: temporary access to Lily street. The ::
:: residents on Lily street and Marigold street are ::
",'" delighted with the reduced traffic. **
<<'" **
<<'" **
<<~ Bruce Hay has submitted his opinion to the **
:: application of the six discussion items on ::
",'" the attached letter. These are the items **
",'" **
",'" he talked about with Jim Elling, d'Arcy and I iloilo
:: on October 4th and what the Council discussed at ::
<<'" the Work Session. Bruce has asked the Council iloilo
:: to respond. ::
~ ~
~ ~
",'" Bruce Hay also provided me with a letter and iloilo
:: proposal from Maxfield Research Group. ::
~ ~
:: Bruce Hay has requested the City give him a 2 ::
",'" year extention on his Special Use Permit so he **
~ ~
<<'" can study alternate use. Attached is a copy of iloilo
:: the proposal for your information. ::
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
",'" N Attached is a letter from the Minnesota **
~ ~
<<'" Department of Health advising Andover of the **
",'" time frame on solving the radium problem **
~ ~
<<'" and/or having a plan. We are currently waiting **
:: for resul tsfrom the lab on the test. In the ::
<<'" first sampling, the Health Department lab was **
<<'" h . **
",'" ~gh on radium; the private lab was low. We had lIo*
:: the test well retested using the Health ::
~ ~
:: continued ::
",'" **
",<< **
",<< **
",. **
<<",**************************************************************
................................................................
o
o
*****************************************************
t::::::::::***************************************************~:
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:~ Page Two :*
:: 10/17/89 ::
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:: Department and two private labs. Preliminary ::
:: indication from the two private labs is that the ::
~~ radium level is low. If the Health Department **
:= lab comes in high, we will of course challenge ::
~~ their results. I have scheduled the Health **
~~ **
~~ Department Agreement for the November 7, 1989 **
:= Council meeting. Dick Clark said this will be ::
~~ okay. **
~~ .**
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ - Also on a related item, the Geological Survey **
=: received funding from the state at the last ::
~~ legislative session and has sampled wells *1, *2 **
:: and *3. Their research is to sample all wells ::
:= at the well head. This has been done by the ::
~~ Health Department before with Andover's well **
:= because of the size of the system but, other ::
~~ cities that have wells that draw water from **
~~ **
~~ multiple formation or different formation may **
:: meet the standards in the system where the ::
~~ Health Department usually samples. Other cities **
:= may have wells producing water with high radium ::
:= thereby affecting the area around the high ::
~~ radium well but not the overall system. . **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~ ~
:~ . **
~:*****************************************~;;;;;;;;;\\\\\\\\\\~
",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"'''''''''''f,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'''''''f'f''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''T
October 9, 1989
MAxFIELD
RE~CH
GROUP
o
Mr. Bruce Hay
9138 Glen Edin Lane
Brooklrn Park, Minnesota 55443
Dear Mr. Hay:
I enjoyed meeting with you last week to discuss your research needs for your
Andover site. Based on our discussion of your immediate needs, I have prepared
a pnoposal outlining a work program to address the potential for housing devel-
opme~t on your site.
Maxfield Research Group, Inc. has been involved in many similar studies of
housing demand in developing communities in recent years, and we bring this
background to your project. Our objective for this prel~minary study is to
determine the depth of the single-family market in Andover, and also to assess
the potential for multifamily development (either townhomes, apartments, or
both) on the site. Our research will include analysis of household growth
trends but will focus on interviews with Realtors and builders, to get a sense
of buyer trends. '
We will review pricing and sales/absorption trends for single-family homes,
townhomes and apartments in Andover and the competitive market area. From this
data and interviews we will estimate the demand for housing in Andover
(Andover's share of growth in the market area) over the next decade, and will
determine which types of housing would be most appropriate for the site and
an appropriate build-out period for the site.
After reviewing this proposal, please contact me with any questions or comments
you may have regarding our suggested work program. If you wish to proceed,
simply sign and return one copy of the <:ontract along with the retainer, and
we will begin our work immediately. We look forward to assisting you w~th your
development planning.
Sincere ly ,
MAXFIELD ,~~SEARCH G~Or")NC.
J-,.,/J.-~r ----,
Lee A. Maxfield
President
LAM/lak
Enclosure
0-
o~
612-338-0012
(i12:1:18,{)(j59 FAX
620 KICKFRNICK, 4;:;0 FIRST AVENUE NORTH
MINNEAI'OI.lS, MINNESOTA 55'101
ii
o
o
MAxFIELD
RESEtRCH
GROUP
October 9; 1989
I
Mr. t Bruce Hay
9138 Glen Edin Lane
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Maxfield Research Group, Inc. proposes to provide research and consulting ser-
vices to address the potential for housing development on a 116 acre site in
Andover, Minnesota. The objective of this preliminary study is to provide
direction on the type(s) of housing with the best potential for the site, and
an estimate of the build-out period based on the depth of the market, and hous-
ing types deemed most appropriate for the site.
The preliminary study outlined below will include a review of the site and
surrounding land uses, a review of household growth trends in the study area
most oriented to your site, and an overview of single-family and multifamily
building trends in the area. As part of the market review, we will interview
Realtors and builders active in the area to get a sense of the depth of the
market and types of housing most in demand. We will also briefly review the
apartment market in the area, looking at building and absorption trends, and
will assess the potential for apartment development on your site.
If needed, this preliminary study can be augmented later by a more detailed
feasibility study for each of the product types considered for development.
The full feasibility studies will provide complete demographic analysis of the
area population, as well as an in-depth review of product types in the area,
and would result in specific recommendations on design, amenities, pricing,
timing, etc.
SCOPE AND COST OF SERVICES - Preliminary Market Overview
A. Site Review
1. Visit site to review access, visibility, natural amenities, and sur-
rounding land uses.
D~
612-338-0012
612-ClCl8-0659I'AX
620 KICKERNICK, 430 FIRST AVENUE NORTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401
~
o
o
Mr. Bruce Hay
October 9, 1989
Page 2
2. Consider its appropriateness for single-family homes, townhomes, and
apartments.
Cost:
2 Hours @ $llO.OO/Hour
2 Hours @ $ 60.00/Hour
$ 220.00
120.00
$ 340.00
B. Household Growth Trends
1. Review household growth trends in the market area from 1970 through
2000 (estimates).
2. Review building permit data in market ~rea from 1980 through 1989.
3. Comment on growth trends.
Cost:
6 Hours @ $ 60.00/Hour
$ 360.00
C. Housing Market Overview
1. Review general housing trends in Andover over last few years: lot
prices, price of homes being built, location, etc.
2. Interview Realtors and builders active in the area on home sales
trends, buyer preferences, depth of market, etc.
3. Overview of townhome sales trends in area, and general comments on any
newer product being built.
4. Review of apartment market including comments on newer buildings lo-
cated in the market area, price and positioning, etc.
Cost: 42 Hours @ $ 60.00/Hour
$2,520.00
D. Conclusions
1. Estimate Andover's household growth potential for next ten years.
2. Comment on strength of single-family market (entry-level, move-up,
executive), and the appropriate positioning for single-family housing
on the subject site.
3. Comment on the strength of the townhome market, and appropriateness of
townhomes on a portion of the subject site.
4. Comment on the strength of the apartment market and the appropriateness
of apartment development on the subject site.
5. Provide a scenario for an appropriate mix of the above housing types,
and estimated build-out period.
Cost: 4 Hours @ $110.00/Hour
16 Hours @ $ 60.00/Hour
$ 440.00
960.00
$1,400.00
o
Mr. Bruce Hay
October 9, 1989
Page 3
E. Memorandum Typing and Preparation
Cost:
25 Hours @ $ 25.00
$ 625.00
Total Cost for Study
$5,245.00
COST OF SERVICES
The work outlined in the Scope of Services will be performed for Five Thousand
Two Hundred Forty-Five Dollars ($5,245), plus the direct costs incurred for
travel, telephone, graphic preparation, and printing. Any meeting time re-
quested by the Client beyond that set forth in the accompanying task outline
will be bi-lled at our normal hourly rates for staff time.
A retainer in the amount of Two Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($2,100) will be
required along with an executed copy of this agreement and before commencement
of work by Maxfield Research Grqup, Inc. The remaining portion shall be pay-
able monthly as costs in excess of the retainer are incurred and billed.
WORK PRODUCT
Findings will be presented in a memorandum format.
COMPLETION TIME
The work outlined under the Scope of Services will be completed within thirty
(30) days of the execution of this agreement, unless delayed by unexpected
emergencies, forces beyond the control of the parties, or by written agreement
of the parties.
PAYMENT
All costs including staff time and out-of-pocket expenses billed on a monthly
basis shall be payable to Maxfield Research Group, Inc. within fifteen (15)
days of receipt of an invoice showing the work completed and the cost of the
work. A finance charge of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month will be
added to the unpaid balance of each invoice not paid within fifteen (15) days.
DISCLAIMER
The objective of this research assignment is to gather and analyze as many
market components as is reasonable within the time limits and projected staff
4::) hours set forth in this agreement.
o
o
Mr. Bruce Hay
October 9, 1989
Page 4
We assume-no responsibility for matters legal in character. The property/land
is assumed to be free and clear of any indebtedness, liens or encumbrances; and
good and marketable title and competent management are assumed, unless other-
wise stated.
If building plans or site plans are included in the report, they are to be
considered only approximate and are submitted to assist the reader in visual-
izing the property. We assume no responsibility for the accuracy of any build-
ing or site plans.
certain information and statistics contained in the report, which are the basis
for conclusions contained in the report, will be furnished by other independent
sources. While we believe ~his information is reliable, it has not been inde-
pendently verified by us and we assume no responsibility for its accuracy.
The conclusions in the report are based on our best judgments as market re-
search consultants.. Maxfield Research Group, Inc. disclaims any express or
implied warranty of assurance or representation that the projections or conclu-
sions will be realized as stated. The results of the proposed project may be
achieved, but also may vary due to changing market conditions characteristic of
the real estate industry, changes in facts that were the basis of conclusions
in this report, or other unforeseen circumstances.
In the event payment is not received on a timely basis, Maxfield Research
GrQup, Inc. shall be entitled to a lien against the subject property.
This agreement will be construed according to the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
TERMINATION
This agreement may be terminated upon written notification of either party to
the other. In the event of termination, the Client will pay Maxfield Research
Group, Inc. for staff hours performed at the firm's normal hourly rates, plus
all expenses incurred through the date of termination.
If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign and return one copy to
the offices of Maxfield Research Group, Inc.
Agreed to this ____ day of
1989.
MA;IELD RESEARCH GROUP,__.~NP
~~ ~-1/J---
ej'! A.Maxfieldv
I
Bruce Hay
LAM/lak
The City of Andover
Attn: City Council Members
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
R\~j~ ~: ~u
CITY OF ANDOVER
10 C C 10/17/11'1
'I :;:rJ3 .J 1
'" d'.4- 1~/111R'9
"SeE '0/1/ /?7
o
October 11, 1989
RE: Mobile Home Park Development
The following is my opinion to the application of the
six discussion items enumerated below, and how the city
ordinances apply to them.
1) PARK LAND DEDICATION:
It is my opinion that a total of 15Y. of my land has to
be used for park purposes, all of which will be kept
private.
2) SCREENING:
It is my opinion that we are required to have set backs
and landscaping, but that the trees that exist, at my
option, mayor may not have to be removed because of the
positioning of mobile homes on the property.
3) TRAFFIC:
The one entrance traffic issue was approved by the Grow
Township Board during their Special Use Permit
application process.
4) SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE:
It is my opinion that the Special Use Permit is
grandfathered in so that the Shore land Management
Ordinance does not apply.
5) FLOOD PLAIN ORDINANCE:
I don't exactly know how the Flood Plain Ordinance
effects our development. I would appreciate the
councils input on this subject.
o
o
o
The City of
October 11,
page Two
Andover
1989
6) GARAGES:
It is my opinion that garages do not have to be built
because they were not part of Ordinance #6 when the
Special Use Permit was issued.
-
I am looking forward to an informative discussion with the
city council concerning these items in hopes that a
compromise or satisfactory solution can be worked out.
'I'..
\~
~~
~ ~ .;::
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~I.
~" ~
.~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ .
~~~
~~~
~ rz.~
"'~
Approximately ten months have passed since you were notified that the City I ~~.'
water system was in violation of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for,
combined radium-226 andradium-228. We, realize that you ha.ve been working on \"':J \t
correcting your water supply-problems, and we commend you on your efforts thus ~ ~ ~
far. ' ~~
Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ~~ ~
(USEPA) drinking water compliance procedures allow a water system twelve ~~ ~
months from the time the vi 0 1 at i on was reported to USEPA (i n your case the ~ .... ~
date reported was January 1, 1989) to achieve compliance with the MCL violated ~,~~
or if compliance cannot be achieved within twelve months, to enter into a
bilateral compliance agreement with the MDH. The purpose of the compliance
agreement is twofold: 1) it documents the water system's intent to comply
with the State's drinking water rules by committing to a schedule for achiev-
ing compliance, and 2) it prevents any legal action being brought against the
water system by the MDH or the USEPA as long as the terms of the compliance
agreement are met.
01
minnesota department of health
.-ro c c. ,
I -
Icjt7/?1
717 s.e. delaware st.
p.o. box 9441
minneapolis 55440
(612) 623-5000
19"1) EC t.' 1:9 c'l'" Uf'
I \ ,eT 1 i .
October 10,
Andover City Council
c/o Ms. Vicki Vo1k, Clerk
City 1fa.i1
1585 Crosstown Boulevard,
Andover~ Minnesota 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
N.W.
Dear Council Members:
We have reached the point in time when the City needs to indicate to our
Department whether remedial measures will be in place to achieve compliance
with the radium MCL by January 1, 1990, or to enter into a compliance agree-
ment with the MDH. Please inform us in writing by October 27, 1989, on which
course of action the City will take and also provide us with a brief summary
of the City's activities related to achieving compliance. For your informa-
tion and inspection enclosed is a sample compliance agreement. If you cannot
meet the January I, 1990, compliance deadline, then this sample compliance
agreement will be the basis for the specific agreement that will be negotiated
between the City and the MDH.
If you have any questions, please contact Dick Clark at 612/623-5227.
o
~lYrsL[)
Gary ~~ng1Und, P~., Chief
Secti~f Water Supply
and Well Management
GLE:RDC:ter
Enclosure
~~
;;...;r MlNNESCITA "-
1990
an equal opportunity employer
~
~
tL
':J
~~::{
~ ~ '""
.-..l (\" ~
\J':'
\t l::!
~~lt
~~1
~ ~.~
\i ~ ~
~~
{
~
~~
~~
~~\
~\
I~
<t
~~
~~
COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT
o
This agreement is made this _____ day of , 19___, by and
between the City of (hereinafter "City") and the Minnesota Depart-
ment of Health (hereinafter "MDH").
WHEREAS, Minn. Rules, p. 4720.0900 establishes a maximum contaminant
level "MCL" for comb.ned radium-226 and radium-228. In the past, the City
supply has been in violation of the radium MCL; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to come into compliance with that standard,
WHEREAS, MDH is in agreement with the compliance procedures and
schedule set for herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the City and MDH that the City
shall construct water supply facilities that will ensure compliance with the
radium MCL on the following schedule:
1. The City will contract with its consulting engineer to provide for
preliminary engineering, water quality, and treatability studies no
later than
2. The City will evaluate the availability of funding through state and
federal sources no later than
3. The City consultant will complete the preliminary engineering, water
quality, and treatability studies no later than
4. Regulatory review of the preliminary engineering, water quality, and
treatability studies will be completed by MDH no later than
o
5. The City will apply for water supply construction funding through
. The application will be submitted by
6. The City will enter into a contract with its consulting engineer for
([j)
final engineering plans no later than
c:> 7. Completion of final engineering plans will be accomplished no later
than
8. Regulatory review of the final engineering plans will be completed
by MDH no later than
9. 'The construction for the water supply facilities will commence no
later than
10. Construction of the water supply facilities will be completed by the
City no later than
11. The water system will return to compliance by
IT IS FURTHER AGREED that this Compliance Agreement may be ter-
minated without hearing upon thirty days written notice by MDH upon a finding
by MDH that the City has failed to comply with any requirement of said
agreement or immediately upon a finding that immediate termination is neces-
sary to protect the health of persons. This agreement shall not prevent MDH
from taking any other lawful action deemed by MDH to be necessary to protect
the health of persons.
Dated this day of
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
,19_.
CITY OF
By By
Its Commissioner of Health Its
and and
Its
Its
o
Q
o
"r:J'F""'~'''''''''''''''':'''..
," .:.:~
;/ "\
~ ..~"
. .L .
t;.t
"'-~ .,,;~
". .,
,.
,c, :~]:~ii'L~~~"'."
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting - october 17, 1989
7:30 P.M. Call to Order
o
,Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Boshea Variance
2. Kelner Special Use Permit
3. Approve contract/Comprehensive plan
4. Award Bids-Nordeen Addn. Lot Sale - HRA
5. Reject Bids/89-10/Sealcoating
6. Accept Feasibility/Comm.park Drainage
7. Approve 1990 Law Enforcement Contract
staff, Committee, Commission
8. 1989 Year-to-Date Review
9. Amend Resolution 012-89
10. Metropolitan Council Development Guide plan
11. street Light Discussion/Bunker & Crooked Lake
12. Speed study Discussion/Hawk Ridge Area
13. purchase of state Aid Computer
14. Capital Equipment Expenditures/Public Works
15. warming House Conversion
16. Epilepsy Month proclamation
17. Refinish City Hall Tennis Court
Non-Discussion Items
18. Accept streets/Lund's 5th Addition
19. Award Bid/Hidden Creek East 2nd/89-17
20. Approve Change Order/88-35/Water Tower
Approval of Claims
Adjourn
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
BY: V. Volk
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
ITEM
NO,
Approval of Minutes
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
October 3, 1989
Regular Meeting
October 5, 1989
Special Meeting
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
o TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
17 October 1989
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APP~.9.~ D FOR
AGE"".."
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Discussion
~T5.M 1. Boshea Variance
Sideyard Setback Along Street BY:
d'Arcy
"~\
Bosell &J
"-
BY: I 'j
j
Zoning/Planning
14649 NW 7th Avenue (Boshea)
Variance Request - Sideyard Setback Along Street
The Planning & zoning Commission at its regular meeting of
September 26, 1989, considered the variance request above-noted
to allow for the construction of an accessory structure eleven
(11') feet from the sideyard property line. Said consideration
is pursuant to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02"Minimum Requirements
and Section 5.04 Variances. It is the recommendation of the
Commission that the Variance be granted based on the following
information and criteria:
In Re:
1. That a hardship has been created due to the adjacent location
of a City-owned drainage easement, said easement being
created as a part of Johnson's Oakmount Terrace;
2. That the location of the easement and the topography of the
adjacent property creates a hardship which precludes the
strict enforcement of said requirements set out in Section
6.02;
.
3. That the variance will not have an adverse effect on the
existing properties or potential use of said property as well
as adjacent properties;
4. That the variance does not violate the spirit and intent of
the Ordinances of the City or the Comprehensive Plan;
5. That the variance include a statement therein that said
accessory building will be used for storage purposes only and
cannot be used for business purposes as set out in Ordinance
No.8, Section 3.02 Definitions, Home Occupations, and
Section 4.30.
See the Planning Commission packet materials dated September 26,
1989, for further information and detail.
COUNCIL ACTION
Q
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -89
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF JEFFREY D. BOSHEA,
14649 NW 7th AVENUE, TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ELEVEN (11') FEET FROM THE SIDEYARD SETBACK
ALONG A STREET.
WHEREAS, Jeffrey D. Boshea has requested a Variance to
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 Minimum Requirements, to allow for
the construction of an accessory structure eleven (11') feet from
the sideyard; and
WHEREAS, the Andover Planning & zoning Commission has
reviewed the request at their regular meeting on September 26,
1989, and
WHEREAS, the Commission finds that a hardship was
created due to the topgraphy of the land and location of a City-
owned drainage easement adjacent to this property and along 147th
Avenue, which restricts the location of said accessory structure;
and
WHEREAS, the Commission finds that the variance will not
have an adverse effect on the existing properties or potential
use of said property as well as adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS, the Commission finds that the variance does not
violate the spirit and intent of the Ordinances of the City or
the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Andover Planning & zoning Commision and
City Council find that the request meets the criteria of the
Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby grants a Variance to allow for the
construction of an accessory structure eleven (11') feet from the
sideyard pursuant to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said accessory structure
shall be used for storage purposes only and cannot be used for
business purposes as set out in Ordinance No.8, Section 3.02,
4.30 and 7.02.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of October, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling, Mayor
o
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
o
~
o
Andover Planning And Zoning Commission
September 26, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Four.
and Zoning Commission recommend to, the ,Andover City Council approval
of the variance requested by Gregg Kroll to allow for the expansion
of a non-conforming home and for a ten foot front yard setback
variance to allow the construction of a deck onto his home at
14933 NW.Crosstown. The Planning Commission finds the proposal
meets the general criteria established in Ordinance 8, Section 5.04
including the strict interpretation of the Ordinance causes the
hardship." The hardship stems from the unique shape, topography,
physical features of the land. The variance will not be detrimental
to the public welfare and the variance is necessary for the reasonable
use of the property. It is further recommended that Greg Kroll
apply for a building permit to the existing structure. The appli-
cation was reviewed by the City Attorney for two requirements: 1)
to determine if structure is non-conforming 2) to consider if approval
will set a precedence or if precedence is different than other
illegal non-conforming structure recently brought to City Council.
Second to motion made by Gretchen Sabel.
Commissioner Vistad requested motion
gazebo" as that is how permit reads.
to amend motion. Commissioners were
commissioners approved. Motion to go
be amended to read "deck and
Mr. Ferris and Ms. Sabel agreed
polled for vote on motion; all
to City Council for review 10/03/89.
Bo.shea Variance Request, 14649 NW 7th Avenue, Sideyard Setback
Request is to locate an accessory structure eleven feet from the
sideyard. Unique characteristics to this property are outlined in
Request for Planning Commission Action memo submitted by d'Arcy Bosell.
Chairman Pease asked if there is screening. Bosell replied that on
Tract A"there is a willow tree and other small trees that provide
screening.
Commissioner Ferris asked if it is possible to move accessory building
further south and eliminate need for variance. . .Ms . Bosell stated
that locating structure to the south could possibly impact natural
drainage.
Mr. Blake stated a hardship would be created if owner would have to
cut into hill in order to locat~~ccessory structure further south.
A second hardship could be the creation of a difficult shaped drive-
way.
d'Arcy Bosell stated
applicant.
dfi-:JI'!P
the easement
/I
belongs to the city, not the
i'
Mr. Blake stated the uniqueness of this property stems from the
city ownedJeasement and the drainage ditch that creates a unique
'topography ~f
Commissioner Spotts asked what the purpose of the structure will be.
Mr. Blake replied the purpose of ,structure is for storage of two
vehicles and the storage of 'toys~-W
cont 'd...
Andover P1annin g And Zoning Commission
September 26, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Five
o
d'Arcy Bosell stated structure is a fully framed structure~ not a
pole barn. Ms. Bosell suggested that included in motion is statement
that structure will not be used for non-residential use.
C6mmissi~ner Vistad made a MOTION that the Andover Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the Andover City Council approval
of the variance requested by Jeffrey Boshea located at 14649 7th
Avenue NW, Andover for the following reasons: the variance being
to constrUCt an accessory building to eleven feet from the sideyard
of property, adjacent to drain easement. The hardship is created
due to the topography of the land. It is felt the variance does
show warrent due to the true reason sideyard setbacks were
established. It will not adversely affect the existing or potential
use of the adjacent land. It is in conformance with with Compre-
hensive Plan. I believe it is necessary due to the topography of
the land to allow reasonable use of the land. I also recommend
that the accessory building cannot be used for business purposes
as set in Ordinance 8, Section 4~Home Occupations and Sections
3.02 Definitions of Home occupatl~s.
Second to motion by Bev Jovanovich.
Gretchen Sabel requests that neighbors at 4352 147th Avenue be notified
before City Council meeting in order to grant an opportunity to
express their opinion.
Mr. Vistad and Ms. Jovanovich agreed to include in motion notification
of neighbors at 4352 147th Avenue.
Mr. Blake will notify neighbors.
Commissioners were polled for vote on motion. Commissioners Sabel,
Ferris, vistad,Jovanovich and Pease favored motion. Commissioner
Spotts opposed motion.
Ordinance 8 Commercial Vehicles R-1 Districts
The Planning and Zoning Commission continued discussion on the
storage - commercial vehicles in residential districts.
Mr. Blake presented a draft Ordinance 8 Amendment.
Mr. Vistad expressed concern that "tractors" as included in definition
of "farm trucks" may be misconstrued. Ms. Bosell stated definition
is exactly as in state statute.
Commissioner Spotts suggested that 4.05 Accessory Buildings and
Structures be changed from allowing the gross weight of commercial
vehicle to not exceed 12;000 pounds gross capacity. Mr. Spotts
believes the average weight would exceed 12,000 pounds.
o
cont 'd...
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
26 September 1989
DATE
5.
14649 NW 7th Avenue
Boshea Variance Request
Sideyard Setback
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Zoning/Planning
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM-
BY: d' lrcy Bosell
rl}~)'\
~~)
BY:
In Re: 14649 NW 7th Avenue (Boshea)
Variance Request - Sideyard setback along street
The request before you is to locate an accessory structure eleven
(11') feet from the sideyard on the above noted property. Said
requirement is regulated under Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 (the
chart) .
(>>
A visual inspection of the property reveals that there are some
unique characteristics to this property which warrant
consideration. On the north side of this property and adjacent
to 147th Avenue is a sixty-six (66') foot drainage easement. The
topography of this area is extreme. The street elevation is
approximately 78.3 at the centerline and falls to 66.0 at the
bottom of the easement, then comes back up to approximately 70.0
just south of the applicant's property line and in the
approximate location of the requested structure. From the road
it falls from west to east from approximately 76.0 at the
property corner (northwest) to 70.00 at the approximate location
of the structure. To mow this easement would present a real
challenge ...
Section 5.04 of Ordinance No.8 provides the criteria by which a
variance can be granted and sets out therein that a variance may
be granted if it will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
this Ordinance and if it finds that strict enforcement of this
Ordinance will cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the individual property under consideration.
The intent of the Ordinance is to regulate the location of
structures and to avoid visual blight by having homes look at the
backs and side of accessory structures which aren't always the
most aesthetically appealing. This structure will be located
seventy-seven (77') feet from the right-of-way of 147th Avenue on
its side yard, but only eleven (11') feet from the easement. The
location of the house to the east of this property will not pose
a problem or encounter a visual blight even though it is set back
to the south of the property line quite a distance. The
accessory structure will be closer to the front than this house
but the angle is such that it should not be easily seen.
o
o
Page Two
In Re: 14649 NW 7th Avenue
26 September 1989
This property is certainly unique in its configuration. The
parcel was an exception to the area platted as Johnson's Oakmount
Terrace and thus has inherited some difficulties that might
otherwise-not have been the case had it been a part of the plat.
I will have available the 1989 aerial photographs for you to look
at.
One item that should be included in your discussion and motion is
that this accessory structure cannot be used for business
purposes, as set out in Ordinance No.8, Section 4.30, Home
Occupations and Section 3.02, Definitions (Home Occupations).
It is the recommendation of staff that this variance be granted
by the city Council.
@
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
Variance It
o
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
-
property Address
P/ltJJ.j<=J
7-+1 AvE-, '-JW
F\i\A()'v~
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate)
Lot
Block
Addition
Plat
Parcel
PIN R. ::o--?Jd.,34 I ~ oo4Y-
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal) 0 l"- ~~c.k
Description of Request ~"-"::.~\- o.-..c:;..ry- ~C\ \d\ V'...C... -\-()
/., (" i\. . ~r ~
/ n-r c;:.e-~~'" O-t-..... ~'1~~{2.\; ',' ~~>.LK
Specific Hardship 'S\~-e.. \"< ~\cC"'A.=...o.e e;\-\c\::.J'~~~
. ' u.
~~ ~ \p~ V-> \, -\-\r.... ~<2.. ,,--\~\ >AU ~ ~o..~ w \...e~ "\ -\- LA..:J:0 -...c ~'-L
..) <<::'e..~~ ~-\~ "-
Section of Ordinance Current Zoning
**********************************************************************
Name of Applicant --S.~ ~,~y \:::), ~OS\,,,,~~
Address / 4toL-J 9 ,'"\-~ ~\I'Q..... N\...U
Home phone ~ - 6 ''lS~. BusineS' Phone /.j d 7- 0 I &' L.
Signature __~__, ~ Date q-I'2..-'Bc,
**********************************************************************
property Owner (~ee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home Phone
Business phone
Signature
Date
**********************************************************************
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
o
The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of
subject property must also be provided.
Application Fee: Single Family - $40.00; other Requests - $65.00
the
~i-ng=F..e.e.:-
~$10. oa - Date Paid
Receipt It
---
o
o
REG ISTERED ABSTRACTERS, INC.
~I-!O - -lth Avenlle North
Anol,a. Millllc:Wta 5530:3
(ul:!) -l~7-:.IUI2
File No.T~7 - ohl.J../
Px,<.j
30 32- .P-"; /3 0 () t.-/~
T
1_--
~r
po
f\
o
c
e
t
;:?
F.
cP+--
,I
~
r---
--=:1
~.
~
1::
f
"-.---.
R E ::p' ~~8~ D
cU3
h-
I
/40
.:L 3.3
W A:009:vd~dicaees correct ly the size and location of the buildings
fltifu~jJ&J&, ~h!AAltI~ed; al:;o the improvements now located on premises in
-crre'trel:i'wrrFiin ehe loe lines, and the improver..encs on adjoining
premi:ses do noe encroach on the pr"ull",es herein insured. ('rhi:> plae is for
mortgagees purposes only)
f\Lr f'nnV
L Uu~ 10
.
/~.N ...... .,!.<,!!P'
:a~ .v'~~:rr-~ ...
~~ r- l-,,~
,;, ~ ~ J> ~" .....
~ ~
Ii; , \00 Z ~<: ~
..~ ~ ~ 'i> .t..
, ~ ITI ~
.
~ .. .f:~'
.,.",// /?~/;'
.J."'=~Z KIOWA
0) ~~ ;<I,r.;Y'
~ ~ ~~ J:"'~r""'::F.
~ f\;) ~'i:
~ ~ ~ '~
~
, N.W. ~/.,..# .nO/
r",N J'.".yZ~';F. J.d~H'Z \ .
.J t. ~ ~l
~ ~ ~ ~N
~ <Jt .,.~,~ -l>. l., '=:.. ,. "'r,:-,... ~~ ~
~ :J~ ~ ~ ~ 't\... :
~O''''l!I.~I..~1 '-~ :
....~:~. "'1":2..aw..... \ $4.p.,e J:a. ~2_~~E
. ~,#I(I . ~P:40 ~ Wd~.A1 fZr
~~"'-/::~-..:.%_'H/~LJU~;'~~- -=~:.. ..: .u:-mJ#~-}(i~'i'IHAV;.....;.~ _~. 'DJ A-r1J' ...~~ ..' :
'.~ ,', ~. ~.....".,. rI~-.. nil ..."....~-Ij':-. ....._.",...,....:. ......"..f$::.-~,.,..,~~.... .
~..._~..~.".,..._ .",-::...~..,.,....' _~ ;. _,~.".,._ ~;: ..:'.~._' ....P4-1~~i:.~.::. J'.".#,,,i#,,. . 'M-
~ i'7TH ~AVENUE ~ 'j ~~$i., j ~ ~ ~'m:..t~11~~li~ COUNTY' STATE~AID HIGHWAY
~ ,Y':!-'~~"'E I I, ,",01 i .tj~ <V4.H ~!oo~L - -. (.;
~ ~ ~ ll,~ :J'4;}-:-,.;,.;. .~: " ;il
~ ~ ell ~ .i.~;~ 1;..,<,.'~i..~;ii-~i:.c:\:\
'- ~ t: ~:,,~ ?'~ -'''''#''-~'' . .,;~.
,~'! I;I~'
~;~ ~I'\ ~~ :~,
I ~.
~i
;,/..,....-.;j. fr
~i ". v ~.'
~~
I';.
.~
\~
i
.. -
~
h.
'i.
~
'"' oJ> ~
~ . lo,."
~.... z ~"
~~ l'T1 H
~~J71~ \
Z
;e
'"
0,
...
~'"
i>.\:i
~
f\;)
,
'"
~l::)
~
f\;)
~<Jt
l\i
......
4."0-
~
~
...?///tf
-;:,.,'
~
'-
~
~
,z/otfd
/.v.~r
;Y..:f~?y,?'~
,/'//.dd
A&N ,J-,u,d/
"''''-<''!>'J7'/V ST.
N.W.
/?~J~ nv-." ~"2.(Jd
\ .~..-/.N.I6/'-"
'" 1Y.1'."".J1W
~-l>. I\) J;l 0, "<l
<Jt .~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
\.C '-
/NoZ.
~'"
~
-?:
<<
;,t.rr~
17~H"
zu,..
~'"
-.;:.
.....~~$.......
.-h'o1/~i}44"
~
,.
~
r;b-
~~~l\
~ ~.01 '.
-i~
'?:I: ~
tlI
'\;l-
e
"U
.,t.;'*'
-;:,..
~ ..
'- "'
>,,~!i
~c.::::
~...",
~~
"
r-
J>
z
ITI
M
o
9 ~
tttll()O ~~
::. .....;.J\
, 'ia
~ '"
~ <Jt -II. \.i.J '"
0 ~
~ ~ -;:;-.
-:::.. I ~ ~
... '..
:..
~ ,
~
<-
.-
" ...
'i!
~
~
~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~~
.,.~ .i.#..#.. ~ 0,
(;,,,'" ~~:.
~~" '-\l~" ~ .,...
",,,,::- ,,":;;'~ ~
"!~~ --~~ ./
, ....""'.. /JZH
~ f"'Y~_':/.'
~
-~
'-
H"'~~;;<
~
r-
~ '" 'b
~ ~
--t"t\-
'"
o
'"
o
...,.
K~.
~
~l.,
......
~~.,,~
GUARANI
--~
_of.';'';
,~
~
,.
I'
~'.... [I;
~~ \"
~ i~
i:
.
~
t!
~
~
-~-- -
-i
':I:
~
~~
...;;.
cl't
"
!<-~
(f~
.~
".~.:
c::
...
-~~
.~
LEROY H. WINNER
L-L g~
~U."'l..."I_.fMl._
16800 V,II., O.h.. A...... /1111;;11. 5530'
,."'.....nl.""
o CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
.ell\.' 1...c...29-...n
JOB MO. sa -161
. D..".. I.... ,1,.
SURVEY FOR: ELMER EC1<AROT
DESC~I8ED AS:
I
The South 179 feet of the Horth 245 reet of the Weet ?o3' f~et of the
Section 30, Town'hlp 32, AenQe 24 In Anokl County, Mlnn,sote, e~ctpt
for public roed rIght of way_
- \ 'I .."
\111 I ,
TRACT'S I..... 1. . .1. ..
TRACT A
". Jo:
s,,~ .f tj,. HE* .r
that part taken
,',
l . . \ .. . '.' ,..."p .. , . ...... ~\.., ...; .. ~ .
....i__
The South 179 (eet of the North 245 reet of the Eeet 200 reet o( the Weat .'3 feet 0'
t,"!e SW~ 0' the Hr", p' Sf!ctlon 30, To_nshlp :32. A~nge 24 In Anoka County, Mlnnellota.
~
I
i
I
S~";'IOC~O~1141 ~ I /'17 ",-'. .In:. If OJ .
SE~ i~' T32, I"" ' N, LINE OF SW 1/0 OF NE 110
'/ I I .... J ---in
I 1~ -:;:::;:r.~J".'II'r.)7f!!. ,&,.r4'r~/"':"'.,.. . : . :: '.:.
.,-<-""'-' _. "l- ;..-. M.....'... ......... '-. "-- ...;.. .___.~._->.'.':1-'.';_...;.____-1c.._.:.__..___.;..,.~.+.:::::_
t_-. 233' ---....--- 200 -
I :-- -'T -- -- ",w' -r. Js' . .
i I IV :i I D'~'tr=~T.O:''''J~~- ~
l!l ~ ') I ,Soo s, r7
~ ::J~' TRACT : TR~' ~~
; I'~ Ii- ~ I A .~~ 'is -1 B ';Z~O 'lH. ;
... vi 1l1~\I
5 I '. I 3 II f 57 s. F:
"'\ tJ." 0.7/5" Acttl.
: I, I
I ~.11'1..
,
-.9
...)
\,
17483'
'00'
I
I
_...1
..u'
u' ss'
o
t{J..>'- - I ,/-?r,;.{L /v-e-,
p(()p.r~ ~ 0+-
flVfl~d ("L~c.J.Ut-
t '-.~r ,.""..... - ..I..~ /( ,,~
1 .w....," the ....,.ty ....nl..... ....... -.I ttoet ..
..... ,'" I. . eorrect '......'..1... .. ..hl .w....,.
, ...,
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
october 17, 1989
DATE
BY;
BY;
AGENDA SECTION,
NO. Discuss~on Items
2.
QBIGINATING
Plann~ng
ITEM
NO.
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the Special Use Permit
application of Michael Kelner to allow the operation of a marine
motor repair shop in an accessory building on his property at
15478 NW prairie Road.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
staff reviewed the request and believes that the request is
not allowed by Special Use Permit in an R-1 Single Family
residential district. Also, the request is outside of the
parameters of a home occupation, as it involves a business
conducted in an accessory building.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The applicant received a letter in March regarding the exterior
storage of vehicles and boats on his property. Mr. Kelner met
with me an informed me that he was operating a marine repair
business in the pole building and needed to continue the operation
since he is a disabled American veteran. At that time, I informed
him that he was in violation of several sections of the Ordinance
(Sections, 3.02, 4.05 and 4.30) and that he would not be able to
continue the operation in the accessory structure.
In July, The Andover deputy was investigating another case and
reported the storage of vehicles to the planning department. It
was apparent that Mr. Kelner was not complying with the zoning
ordinance. I forwarded the file to Bill Hawkins.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
o TO
SECOND BY
o
Page 2
Kelner SUP
October 17, 1989
The application is a result of the compliance orders and
correspondence with the applicant. I made a second effort to ask
the applicant if he wanted to continue with the process, even
though it would not receive a positive recommendation from the
Planning Department. He stated that he wanted to proceed with the
application anyway.
GENERAL REVIEW
The subject property, approximately 3 acres in size, is zoned R-1
single family. The accessory building is located roughly 100 feet
north of the principle structure. the applicant stores the boats
near the north property line. The property is screened by a line
of pine trees.
The proposal would be in direct violation of several sections of
the zoning ordinance, including:
Section 3.02 - Definition of a Home Occupation
Section 4.05 (I) - Use of Accessory structure
Section 4.30 - Home occupation Parameters
The city has interpreted the home occupation section of the zoning
Ordinance to include any business use, including professional
offices, minor repair services, studios, dressmaking, or teaching
taking place within the principle structure that would not need
more than three parking spaces. Staff believes that the request
is outside the parameters of a home occupation.
The City has the authority to review special use permit
applications based on the proposed effect on the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions including
parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, and the effect on
property values and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the
effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
use on the health, safet , morals
community.
While the mere presence of a marine repair business in a
residential district may not present a health, safety or moral
dilemma for the neighbors, the intense use of the accessory
structure sets a dangerous precedent by allowing a business
operation to be run from an accessory building.
o
Also, allowing an illegal business to operate would create
enforcement problems in the future.
o
o
Page 3
Kelner SUP
october 17, 1989
2) The existing and antici~ated traffic conditions on adjacent
streets, including park1ng facilities.
The proposed use would not have a significant detrimental effect
on the traffic of parking conditions in the area.
3) The effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
The operation of a business from an accessory building could have
a detrimental effect on the property values of surrounding
properties. The intensity of the use is greater than a home
occupation and should be treated as a commercial use in a
residential district.
As the city continues to grow, allowing commercial uses within a
residential district, will create problems for future
improvements and development in the neighborhood.
4) The effect on the Comprehensive Plan.
The Andover Comprehensive Plan and Development Framework outlines
major policy objectives for commercial development within the
City. One of the major concerns of the Comprehensive plan is the
transition between commercial uses and residential districts. The
placement of a commercial use in the middle of a residential
district would not be in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan.
In order to allow the use, the City would have to amend the zoning
ordinance to allow home occupations in an accessory building.
This is option that I do not believe the City would want to
pursue.
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS:
1. The Andover City Council may approve the Special Use Permit
application as submitted by Michael Kelner to allow the
operation of a marine repair business from an accessory
structure on property described as: the east 400 feet of the
north 300 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of
Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.
The City may wish to impose conditions for the business
including, but not limited to the following:
A. The business office will be moved to the principle
structure.
o
o
Page 4
Kelner SUP
Option 1, continued
B. The building will meet all requirements of the State
Uniform Building code and will be inspected by the fire
marshal to ensure compliance with state fire code
requirements.
C. There wilL be no more than three vehicles (including boats
and marine equipment) associated with the business parked
on the property at anyone time.
D. The Special Use Permit will be reviewed annually to ensure
compliance with city Ordinances.
2. The Andover City Council may deny the Special Use Permit
application as submitted by Michael Kelner to allow the
operation of a marine repair business from an accessory
structure on property described as: the east 400 feet of the
north 300 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of
Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.
The City Council finds that the proposal does not meet the
requirements set forth in the Andover Zoning Ordinance for a
Special Use Permit, including potential negative effects on the
welfare of the community, traffic and parking, property values and
the comprehensive plan. The request is outside the parameters of
a home occupation and to grant the proposal would require an
ordinance amendment.
3. The Andover City Council may table the proposal.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City Planning Staff recommends option 1t2.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the request at
their September 26, 1989 meeting. A public hearing was held and
no negative comments received. However, due to the fact that the
operation violates several sections of the Zoning Ordinance and is
beyond the parameters of a home occupation, the Commission
recommends denial of the request.
@
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
SUP it
o SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FORM
property Address
/5~?!?
ff,..a ; Y' / ~
I?d
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever~s appropriate)
Lot
Block
Addition
plat 0.59,;3 Parcel 1&'"/;1.
PIN .)3 -3')~.J.t/- /LI- tJ()~ ({,
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
Reason for Request /Y1,4 ~, >v if
,//oJo TelL ;(~ /:4/ 'If!
Section of Ordinance
Current Zoning
**********************************************************************
Name of Applicant //1 i' /;/4 ,.c / L // ,L L /V~.Ifd
Address !..5'-/7~ /,/(/?/;f,-i- ;('0,
Home Phone 1../57"- ?c.c: 9 Business Phone ~A./Y1e.
Signature ~~ ;I. '1f"~ Date 9- & - 79
**********************************************************************
property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
**********************************************************************
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
-"The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of the
~subject property must also be provided.
Application Fee: $150.00
Date Paid
C}-iP-%1
/
Receipt 4t
Filing Fee:
$10.00
-.---.--..-
It; : : : ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ; : : : ; : : : : : : : : : : :
1 1 I I I I I ! ! I I I Ii: I I t l I 1 t I I I l I :.! I 1 I I I : I I I I I I
~'I : l",,,~~~'l~~ !{~ ~F~~.;~r- --+-,Cl+i-1
.:.=:::. ';1' il'-:": I,' I' I'V I' I' Ii :: 1 .. :tJ-<,~ I ~~ ,. 'I i \ /:: : :-:.:: (~,: 'I. \ ~,'
I, r . I !, -II ."w, , ,,," \~;. I : ..J.. .' ~': -! \ _~.'f""! . '\
.:= :;:;;;:V=:1 · / - --!----~-- '. i/I .' IffJ i ,I \ '\ 'I; ---,-,:~'/ -', -"'-:,:-- f- '--,,:--- w'-+--:----~'~---
.. === X~,,: '!: .., i ~ /, rl
.~' ~;t~~" -- i i :, r {t=l; , -ltf8-~~~~r~~+
.:= i ~! / rl'l~, ! I /Ivil ~... ~g.n.. i .. "f YI r ,=--. .I;'~I~~
.::: .c<_ r--7- r ' : - --~,;-..:.-Tr--l'/ !I ........, i --Ell ~.:' -~dl-~hl: '" ---- Ji.:~.,." /: ---- .m-....,f,-.--.. . 'fl;; I~; I~;
, I' .1....---,. ~ h " 'nl':" .' .,'.,. 7 ' '"I" '1'1"1"'"
::=,~! l i.l .Y~ _ ! '71 II!!.I I I. ,.,)-\..... "jO,.y....,...J __!
.:~~;(~'~'~~~::I ~:.~~ \-L ~-~;~" / --- I~:.J --- -~-- --~-~I!--J -~'I c. s'.d~1 e
::-!~~:. :':~ :::~~~~: i ~~, I .--~':~' /' 3~1 " .. -----
~~~~~~:.: .:~.': ~ IHil 1___ ~': ~ I \____ _ i I ! ~ _ i
::"-i)f~~:\:::':..>Lt5(":'~~'~ l,~'~~q~ i! I! f-l
..-;1: :)'''-'.: . I ~ ''jf ,,; ;;'\'. ~ f1T.. ';. :".1". ',1____ ~..'- [
:~::::'lf4;:tH ':'~;f;IJI~_;~. ;~.'.:h;. !// 8 ! 1 I \ H ~h~, ! '~'
.._,.t:= . '~'.' ~l.W::b-:L..ji~... ( ~' - ;::r-m,' 1,---,-----, ~\;...., m --1
::= Y ---'--'I':; 'I ! I. :;..,. ''I, 'I,' k I ~ I ~ .;~~ i, i~,'i "j;;/ ,
.__ Ir- I,. ..0. :ll~ . r--, ' ,.- ,.,..- 1 ""1! I
:~~~iM~~:p= ,;F~;----L---\ -! I~L~~~~~~; J
___ ,~ ;;p : I. 1 " " . # ~... ..~
.:::: r ,;":,, I 'III !. ~':: ~ .-- 1 ~:' ,~'I",II ~"-:"\~~P13~ ~ ~:;"
:~; ~I=J!-~:~ :_ . .: ;~'):' ~~~:;~~"i, ,':,' , I ,~ ~_~~~~~:.:, ~\ d:-,="" .
___i,~,,-, !,.h-. ....1 l'j,ijjC. i.---: ,~~' i----.'
.:= .!;!.""....,:;:;-: : "'0 -' ,,:1 i ". .'.~._ ~ ' 'l I r:ki..f, " I
..- i ~~., :' i rg' .' " : i+:-~.~." ~ '. J., Hf70iA 1 :
.:=: ~----' (WjJ! :!: '---, ~~~~~~:~---+ f:~' '~.:~':: '-...:-
.:= '\,JJ. ! i~' I i'N~~1 ?1~''''N-t: d; : :l~I"": ~
::= A 'J~ I -: '/'t;':"~II"'''!!.ii.!~[}I~:f1~\;dJ!, ~.:jJ =4 . .. ~
::::. ~. '''~;~ ! : "'I\.'~lil;~II~..~ ...$-;': ~
.::= ~~. 'r ---1.- -T--- I':' '.' : ;".:-:" .~ ~.. "
::= 'I :""'1:-' ~: -/,' " ~,. '~'l .. '"
::= ~! Hc.J II IU c I II r 1.8\\ "".
-.. ,i'""" --, I I I II L~ ')
~3~ ------, =t-r---~- --.~.-. I i /Jl!tdJ
..- <<m..-mUL . ~;2/-
of: ;:~ \\ : ----r Yf~~~
;js
~
Z~l!~.>w
4!
.
;! I.,.
1I~
H il;
i i ~ i I
a. ,dll
I ii~ .
ffi __d
> in
o I
~~~i
2i IJ.. 0 r
::Ii 0 J::; liii,":'
~81C. !"j
_ hiii" i
U
11111 '
nUi
. L....
_..,nn .
'-"
,
--
o
ZONING MAP
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
~"<
,'111 I.,' '1 :::::: ::.,:.:: '::111:::':111'::"::::':":: 11,':'%1':':' ': :.:. "::';':11:::111::'::":::::'%':
i i Iii i i i i i i H ill I t I I I I Iii I: ! Ii! Iii i II I it i i i i Iii i I I ! ! i ILiJj i i L!.l! i Iii I i Iii I : i 1 i ! i i i ! ! i I i Iii III i ; i Iii II i i ! ! II II i I
ZONING MAP
... L~. 1: ~ ,~ =~:
r-. ~ ___
, '--- '-I
I ,~ 1/-' ---
-_.=-'-'~I ::::t="7~~'''---
. "':---1.. !- ~":'''I' ::.:,'
1:-"l:5l '-- /
... L.. "?,=-':;;""-"--_ \
~'i'l~ . 0'~~===
--. ~.--'
,. rr=:-.r'\ -'-1---
LEGEt~D
R-,
5.."..'..11,,,.,..
R-2
S~'I"'.""I,.I;.I.'.
R-3
..",I,,'"a1lyl.........
R...
1,",I.."...uIYU"'.
R-,"
1I.....t.ct.N.tl...lIot
l<'-'
11111",,'6 D_lIIf1'~ Oe.~ty'
l<'-2
1I111t1...o..lII..
LB
UllW'.......'.....
NB
.....................1_..
SC
....... c..'M
GB
~.P...,,,...
LI
U.n'-1M..""
GI
G_...........,ry
GR
_..IRe....'...
k_clU_,/"//
Aert...,_l....._--'_
_..'._TIIoO,...._
----
-----
-.,....-.11'
---
~,
'V
iT":
, ,
-
, , t. '
: 1
o
o
"""
~
~
~
"'-
,~
o
-;J:,,-v iJ,' C/J re 5
;<?,'-v6- -r1f'<!'e5
~
'"'
C>
. - /."",.,~I<'/i'O_-'
I
, llC
~J5
i}.(,
IIbV$'~
"';0' "Ji/Vl ;ni;lO J.!)
f/f:/l/If/c!-
---7 /l./
If D.
I,
!
o
".?,,"'I.'~.:S"
9f"6 dtJ9c7 h-:'A"'''S''#~
;;~ "'''O'-~ p.v"""Co .~.... ~
a'itO~
Jr~r'V~J
.... '?1'''8~
~
C:l
~
..:..J..
-'... 0
c...~-r.
~ ~ "":
~"""~
.",
'{'
,-,..,
, ,
, ,
, ,
.
,. ,
'-,-
,/
.....1 .......
~ J
-
"/f
"-"'~/Y
q)
'-=
)
.-..t;~ ~'t:..-
~
'-
'--;9.$ 'E.'9~
,lI,,7/"C ~:7!'~
cf' .9
6'
,..... \
~ j
"
;r7~; ~~7/. !10.y
'I..
. :a .aLl
''O~'''-G10t10'~ "::.:..:...:;:...
--."--.F2"f99~ -:.:;.:,; :Ht7~: .-- _..?
...J99....':" .1.
,0
-:-:-"1:",
.I<
,S(
: t''',
'I "-;1 ~
~
~
-.~
"
,~ .
,,'-.:tG) ~.
." " " .
^ ...~ ,
":"\. '-.... ."
~ '", ,':
~
r1
~'-"'~r:7 p~
?/'-rI"-;.'
'.
--,
..$J
()
Q~:
II
~
'I
~
~.
..... b
~
Z :':;W.N,'r
;;,/ ,~,,';r /~ 'P'f" ....J //.,.-
- " ~ \
c:;- " S '0 . <::s ~
" ~ ~
...; ~ tJ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~. ~ '\~ '\
- ~ ... '" It) ~
,~ ~ '" .~ ~
~ '1 J:
~
t- ~
"
~ ~ .........
" lD
".
~ ~
~ ~ -
~---~ ' 0'
.. --
,-~:-
~
~
'l
t6
1)
(j'-
~
~
~
~
't
~
"l
J;f.~"{/;'-'" 3r";.~
. ;'1"Er
(;tJ;(P
-r--
I ;.
\. \ '1\
. \ ' N~BH:l:~e~L_.~ .-.-.-.---
----~_2~~~-___::._ _ _____ I~__ __________ ________
~,A;....~$,(.s_ ,/'I<Q/,=--<~$'/VlY!t:.L. "'.L"~~r,/ 6UO~3""""'" ~ J/>9"'~.7," /'y'" Z8Eo~a '''fr~
----------~-~------ -
. .
,
\,
\
"
.
~
,
'\.
,
-,
,
,I
~I
,
<
I
r\'
I
,
.
",,'" I.
/'
,
I
,
, ,
,
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, September 26, 1989 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use
Permit application of Michael Kelner to operate a repair shop in
an accessory building. on the following described property:
The east 400 feet of the north 300 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of
the Northeast 1/4 of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka
County, Minnesota.
(Approximate Property Address: 15478 NW Prairie Road)
written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
~d~
V1ctor1a Volk, City Clerk
John Kuehn
15540 prairie Road
Andover, MN 55304
Henry Johanson
15451 prairie Road
Andover, MN 55304
Gordon Nordeen
15357 prairie Road
Andover, MN 55304
~y Hansen
- 154th Lane
An over, MN 55304
Anthony Schipper
891 - 154th Lane
Andover, MN 55304
Pat & Dirk Tornquist
836 - 154th Lane
Andover, MN 55304
Corinne & Fay Anderson
15505 prairie Road
Andover, MN 55304
o
CITY of ANDOVER
ANDOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 26, 1989
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning commission
was called to order ~t 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Rebecca Pease on Tuesday, --
September 26, 1989 at the Andover City Hall Offices, 1685 Crosstown Blvd.,
Andover, MN.
commissioners Present: Chairman Pease, Bev Jovanovich, Gretchen Sabel, Ron Ferris,
Don Spotts, Wayne vis tad
Others Present: Jay Blake, d'Arcy Bosell
Approval of Minutes
MOTION made by Ron Ferris to approve minutes of the 9/12/89 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting. Second to motion by Bev Jovanovich. All commissioners
agreed to motion; September 12, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
minutes approved.
Kelner, Special Use Permit, Public Hearing
The Andover planning and Zoning Commission was asked to review the Special Use
Permit application of Michael Kelner to allow the operation of a marine motor
repair shop in an accessory building on his property at 15478 NW prairie ROad.
Three photographs of property were submitted to commission. Photographs on file
with original minutes.
Mr. Ferris asked if the storage of vehicles reported by deputy (as referred to
in Request for Planning Commission Action memo) included boats?
Mr. Blake replied a couple of boats and cars were stored.
situation is not a "junk yard" effect, but regardless, is
with zoning ordinance.
Blake stressed the
not in compliance
Chairman Pease inquired if there have been complaints against Mr. Kelner's
operation of business.
Mr. Blake answered no complaints from neighbors or others have been recorded.
Chairman Pease asked what the difference is between Mr. Kelner's operation and
the Ordinance definition of a minor repair service.
Mr. Blake stated that according to Ordinance a repair service is
repair and/or service of such items as jewelry, watches, clocks,
appliances, office machines, etc. In other words, the intent is
of small, portable items.
defined as
small household
to allow repair
o
cont'd...
(-:-
o
(
"
o
Andover Planning and zoning commission
September 26, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Two
Mr. Kelner stated the vehicles in question when deputy cited him were his cars
and boats he had borrowed from friends. Kelner stated boats are turned over
every two - three days. He does not charge for the storage of boats.
Mr. Ferris asked Mr. Kelner how many business repair jobs are in progress at one
time on site. Mr. Kelner stated there are usually between two - five jobs on site.
Commissioner vistad asked Mr.
that it is against Ordinance.
and did not kn~his business
Kelner if he was aware
Mr. Kelner replied he
was against Ordinance.
when he began this business
moved to Andover in 1968
Commissioner Ferris asked Kelner the length of time he has been at current location.
Mr. Kelner stated he has been at current location for six years.
Commissioner Vistad asked what year Home Occupation Ordinance became effective.
Mr. Blake answered there are three sections to Home Occupation Ordinance. The
original definition was adopted in the original Ordinance in late 1970 and early
1971. The section dealing with accessory structures was adopted in 1971. In
1979 the Ordinance was amended.
Mr. Blake has on file information regarding Mr. Kelner's inability to gain
employment due to his back disability.
Mr. Ferris asked if Mr. Kelner has employees working with him in business.
Mr. Kelner replied he does not have hired help.
Mr. Ferris asked if "running" a business could be construed as the bookwork,
invoicing, etc. that currently takes place within the home.
Mr. Blake replied that "running" a business within the home infers the repair
work is conducted within the home. He stated that a private garage shall not
be utilized for business, service or industry. The intent of Ordinance is
to keep any home based business low visability.
Mr. Ferris stated Ordinance does not differentiate between Rl and R4.
Chairman Pease opened the Public Hearing.
Irv Thornquist, 836 l54th Lane, stated that Mr. Kelner is a good neighbor and
verified that business is seasonal.
Commissioner Spotts made a MOTION. to close the public hearing. Second to motion
by Ron Ferris. All commissioners agreed to motion; public hearing closed.
Commissioner Vistad asked if a variance based on handicap or disability would
apply.
Mr. Blake replied a hardship can be a reason but not the sole reason
to justify a Special Use Per~it.
Chairman Pease asked how city is dealing with other small engine
repair businesses that are in non-compliance with Ordinance.
Mr. Blake stated such businesses are being put on notice and dealt
with in a consistant manner.
cont'd.. .
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
September 26. 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Three
,-------
"
o
Chairman Pease inquired how like communities respond to such
situations. Mr. Blake answered most communities have similar
Ordinance but not all communities enforce their Ordinance.
Mr. spotts
the rules.
authority.
stated the Planning and Zoning Commission must follow
The City Council can respond/proceed within their
Mr. Kelner asked commission to define hobby. Chairman Pease
replied a hobby would not have main purpose of deriving a proLit.
Commissioner Vis tad explained that purpose of Planning and Zoning
Commission is to make recommendation to City Council based on
Ordinance. Mr. Kelner can go to City Council and state his opinion.
Chairm~n pease stated City Council is empowered to make decision
to go against Ordinance. The recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Commission will go to City Council October 17, 1989.
Commissioner Ferris made a MOTION that the Andover Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the Andover City Council denial of
the Special Use application as submitted by Michael Kelner to allow
operation of a marine repair.business from an accessory structure
located on property described as the east 400 feet of the north
300 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 23,
Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. The Planning and
Zoning Commission finds the proposal does not meet requirements
as set forth in the Andover zoning Ordinance for a Special Use
Permit including potential negative effects on the welfare of the
community, property values and the Comprehensive Plan. The request
is outside the parameters of a Home occupation and to grant the
proposal would require an Ordinance Amendment to Ordinance 8,
Sections 3.02, 4.05 and 4.30.
Second to motion made by Commissioner vistad.
Mr. Ferris stated he is not entirely comfortable with this motion;
motion is made in strict compliance to Ordinance. Mr. Ferris be-
lieves the City should differentiate between R1 and R4. He states
City Ordinance allows no flexibility. Mr. Ferris believes to a
certain limitation people should have the right to choose what they
do on their property.
Commissioners were polled for vote on motion. All commissioners
agreed with motion to deny special use permit.
Variance, Kroll, 14933 NW Crosstown
Mr. Blake presented commission with a letter from City Attorney
William G. Hawkins outlining his legal opinion regarding the
Kroll variance request. Copy of letter attached to original minutes.
Mr. Hawkins believes the granting of the variance would be permitted
under the criteria set by state statute.
o
Commissioner Ferris made the MOTION that the Andover Planning
cont'd.. .
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
october 17, 1989
DATE
AGENDA SECTION,
NO. D1SCUSSlon Items,
3.
ITEM pp ove
NO. Compo Plan update
9.JY~W~lhNgG DE~PARTMENT
Jay BlaKe Planner
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover city Council is asked to review and approve the
enclosed contract between the City of Andover and
Urbanalysis for the update of the Comprehensive plan and
Development Framework. A copy of the contract was sent to Bill
Hawkins for his review.
The Planning and zoning Commission will be meeting with the
consultant beginning this month. I would ask that the Council
also appoint a Council member and Park Board member to sit on the
Comprehensive Plan Update Committee.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Project Number
o
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES
Between the
City of Andover
City Hall
Andover, MN 55014
hereinafter called the CLIENT, and
URBANAL YSIS
5215 Third Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55419
hereinafter called the CONSULTANT.
WITNESSETH:
It is the intention of the CLIENT to provide professional planning and consultation in the
city and the CLIENT desires to engage a CONSULTANT to render certain technical
assistance in connection with such undertakings of the CLIENT:
hereinafter called the PROJECf.
WHEREAS, the CLIENT finds that sufficient funds have been authorized and
. appropriated to cover the compensation for the services agreed to herein, and
WHEREAS the CLIENT finds that the proposed scope of services and terms for this
contract are acceptable, and
WHEREAS, the consultant desires to provide said services and agrees to do so for the
compensation and upon the terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT do mutually agree as set
forth below:
1. Employment of CONSULTANT. The CLIENT hereby engages the
CONSULTANT and the CONSULTANT hereby agrees to perform the professional
services hereinafter set forth.
2. Area Covered. The CONSULTANT shall perform the services provided under this
contract in connection with that area of the city generally relating to its corporate
boundaries.
o
~
~
2
o
3.
Scope of Work.
I. INTRODUCTION
The CONSULTANT will provide technical expertise and prepare the Andover
Comprehensive Plan in a manner sensitive to the needs of the residents of Andover and
in compliance with Metropolitan Council Guidelines. The CONSULTANT will perform
necessary tasks outlined in the work program in a timely manner.
II. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE
The City of Andover will establish a comprehensive plan task force to meet on a regularly
scheduled basis (monthly) with the consultants. The purpose of the task force involvement
is to provide timely citizen input to the planning process and to ensure appropriate
consideration of local issues with respect to the various elements of the plan. Task force
members should include individuals from: city council, planning commission, housing and
redevelopment authority, economic development commission, parks and recreation, and
citizens at large.
m. PLANNING PROCESS
From a planner's perspective, there are basically five steps in the planning process. They
include: (1) inventory, (2) analysis, (3) plan preparation, (4) plan evaluation and revision,
and (5) plan implementation. Each of these steps must be applied to the various elements
of the comprehensive plan. Within this process, it is important to review existing goals,
objectives, and policies. An important early function of the task force is to determine
their appropriateness and adequacy. The goals, objectives and policies should be
periodically reviewed throughout the process to ensure response to community needs and
desires.
Inventory. The inventory phase includes collection of background data including:
demographic information such as population, employment, housing, income, age/gender,
etc.; existing land use; and natural features such as soils, slopes, vegetation, hydrology, and
bedrock. Typically, this information is presented in the document as text and numerous
maps, graphs, and charts. Another important element of the inventory is the Survey of
Community Attitudes and Preferences. This involves a random sample survey of residents
to determine local attitudes, preferences, needs, goals, etc. This information provides a
basis for establishing community goals and objectives with respect to the various plan
elements.
Analysis. The background information is analyzed to establish the current status and
trends within the community. A particularly useful tool for evaluation of land use
o potential is an overlay system which identifies the restrictive nature of land with respect
f\),
"(.Y
o
o
3
to development. All land within the city is categorized as severely, moderately, or slightly
restrictive to development. By superimposing various land use plans over this map, it is
possible to determine growth capacities of the city. This has proven to be a valuable tool
for visually communicating land use information to local decision makers.
Plan Preparation. The plan preparation involves the determination of appropriate land
use locations, area sizes, and timing of development. Since each land use element is
interdependent with other land uses and the phasing of utilities, the development of
various plan elements requires constant reevaluation of the elements with respect to one
another.
The plan document should provide clarity and consistency with respect to each element.
Therefore, the recommended format for presentation of each element of the plan is as
follows:
I. INTRODUCTION
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
III. CURRENT STATUS (including opportunities and constraints)
IV. ISSUES
V. PLAN
VI. NECESSARY ACTIONS (including implementation tools)
Plan Evaluation and Revision. Once the plan has been completed in the draft form, it
is necessary to critically review the plan to ensure that it provides the means of
accomplishing the goals and objectives of the City of Andover. Also, attention should be
directed toward content, and clarity. Satisfactory review by staff and task force will result
in a revised draft ready for submittal pursuant to requirements set forth by Metropolitan
Council Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
Implementation. The implementation process is an ongoing process to be carried out by
the City staff, planning commission, and council.
IV. PROPOSED OUTLINE FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOCUMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
A PLANNING OVERVIEW
B. RELATIONSHIP OF LOCAL PLAN WITH RESPECT TO
METROPOLITAN REGION
C. SUMMARY OF ENABLING LEGISLATION
II.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A INTRODUCTION
(\),
'<Y
o
B.
C.
D.
4
E.
HISTORIC OVERVIEW
REGIONAL SETTING
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
1. Population
2. J\ge/Gender
3. Income
4. Employment
5. Households
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS
1. Soils
2. Slopes
3. Vegetation
4. Hydrology
LAND USE
1. Existing Land Use
2. Current Land Use Plan
3. Current Zoning
F.
III. UTILITIES
A INTRODUCfION
B. GOALS
C. CURRENTSTJ\TUS
D. ISSUES
E. PLAN
F. NECESSARY ACTION
o
The location and extension of water and sanitary sewer serves as a primary
tool for influencing growth patterns of a community. The focus of this
element includes provision for water, sanitary sewer, and surface water
drainage. This effort will require coordination with the city engineer, the
Metropolitan Council, and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
The utilities section will include the following information:
1. Map indicating location, type and capacity of existing and proposed
metropolitan sewer facilities, if any, and local connections to these
facilities
2. Map of existing and/or proposed municipal wastewater treatment
facilities
3.
Map of areas of existing on-site disposal systems and estimated
number of on-site systems
~
>,;;;y
o
o
IV.
5
4. Map of existing and/or proposed sewer facilities being used jointly with
another community, if any, including area of service, number of
connections and service flow volume
5. Discussion of need, capacity, timing, costs, etc. of fwre municipal
wastewater treatment facilities
6. Existing and projected (2000) sewered households and/or housing units
and employment by interceptor service areas, if more than one
7. Existing and projected (2000) sewer flows by interceptor service area,
if more than one
8. Proposed areas, timing and staging plan for local sewer service to 2000
9. Existing and proposed land use maps and projected flows by land use
10. Map showing private wastewater treatment systems (other than single-
family residential on-site systems), indicating which ones, if any, are
to be connected to municipal systems and when
11. Map indicating suitability of land for on-site systems
12. Description and location of existing sewerage problems (e.g., sewer
system capacity limitations, failing on-site systems, and inflow and
infiltration)
13. Standards and implementation program for installation and
management of on-site disposal systems and licensing of installers,
pumpers and haulers
HOUSING AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USE
A. INTRODUCnON
B. GOALS
C. CURRENT STATUS
D. ISSUES
E. PLAN
F. NECESSARY ACTION
This section will contain an inventory and analysis of existing housing, housing
conditions, and residential land uses. The following information will be
included:
1\.:\
\;;})
6
o
1. Total number of dwelling units and percentage of dwelling units by
housing type (single-family, townhouse, duplex, multi-family, etc.)
2. Number and percentage of owner-occupied and rental units
3. Current household size compared to number of bedrooms in housing
unit
4. Cost and rental ranges for owner-occupied and rental units
5. Number of publicly-assisted housing units
6. Number of housing units in need of rehabilitation or improvement
7. Number of overcrowded housing units or those lacking plumbing or
kitchen facilities
8. Current and projected employment opportunities in the community
9. Number and percentage of households by income level
10. Number and percentage of households by age
11. Existing type, amount and intensity of residential land uses
12. Land potentially available for future use for each of the residential
density classifications identified in the plan
13. Analysis of housing type, cost and location; e.g., relationship of supply
of housing to anticipated local and regional need for affordable
housing, relationship between types of employment opportunities and
housing affordable to the work force, suitability of housing for persons
at all stages of life cycle, problems with concentrations of lower-cost,
substandard or particular types of housing units within the community
14. Comparison of local housing situations to surrounding communities
and Metropolitan Area, in terms of type, density, cost, land use
regulations
15. Analysis of sub-regional trends affecting the community's provision of
housing
o
~
'0/
7
o
V. COMMERCIAL LAND USE
A. INTRODUCTION
B. _ GOALS
C. CURRENT STATUS
D. ISSUES
E. PLAN
.F. NECESSARY ACTIONS
This section will contain an inventory and analysis of existing commercial
land. The focus of the plan will be on projected needs of various types of
commercial activity. This includes the size and location of:
1. Convenience centers
2. Neighborhood centers
3. Community centers
VI. INDUSTRIAL LAND USE
A. INTRODUCTION
B. GOALS
C. CURRENT STATUS
D. ISSUES
E. PLAt~
F. NECESSARY ACTION
This section will contain an inventory and analysis of existing industrial land
use. The focus of the plan will be on projected needs of industrial lands.
This includes the size and location of:
1. Light industrial
2. Medium industrial
VII. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
A. INTRODUCTION
B. GOALS
C. CURRENT STATUS
D. ISSUES
E. PLAN
F. NECESSARY ACTION
This section will contain an inventory and analysis of the existing parks and
open space system. This will include:
o
1.
Map identifying existing and proposed federal, state, regional, local
~
40J
o
o
1\:\
\Y
8
or other recreation open space facilities and their functions; physical
links (trails or common boundaries) should be clearly marked
2.
Existing land uses adjacent to existing and planned regional parks,
park reserves and trail corridors
3.
Proposed land uses adjacent to existing and planned regional parks,
park reserves and trail corridors
4.
Local parks or trails that connect with or otherwise affect regional,
quasi-public or neighboring parks or trails, including a description of
the location and proposed development schedule of the link
5.
Whether any regional parks will be used as part of the local park
system and the function they will serve in the local system
6.
Identification of local recreation needs to 2000
7.
Goals, objectives, policies, standards, and programs to satisfy existing
and anticipated local recreation service demand to 2000
8.
Policies to protect regional recreation open space lands from adverse
impacts from inappropriate development or activity on adjacent lands
9.
Implementation section -- land use policies that will minimize conflicts
between existing or proposed land uses and existing regional parks,
park reserves or trails
10.
Implementation section -- description of existing or proposed programs
that community is undertaking or will undertake with regional
implementing agencies to acquire and/or develop regional parks or
trails
11.
Implementation section -- description of existing or proposed programs
and ordinances to protect existing regional park property located in
the community or adjacent to it
12.
Implementation section -- land use regulations to protect potential
park areas from incompatible development prior to park acquisition
13.
Five-year capital improvement program identifying proposed local
parks projects and funding sources
9
o
VIII. TRANSPORTATION
A. INTRODUCnON
B. GOALS
C. CURRENT STATUS
D. ISSUES
E. PLAN
F. NECESSARY ACfION
This section will include information on the existing transportation system,
future needs, and proposed plan for the future with specific traffic circulation
plans. This will include:
1. Policies on provision of local transportation facilities -- arterial and
collector streets, transit, parking and bicycle facilities
2. Maps of existing and proposed functional classification system,
including metropolitan highways, local highways and roads, and
interchanges and other major intersections with the metropolitan
highway system
3. Definition of functional classification system components
4. Clear definition of type and density of non-residential land uses (e.g.
"freeway development" is not specific enough to determine traffic
impacts)
5. Maps or charts of existing and proposed traffic volumes and capacity
throughout the transportation system
6. Maps of existing and proposed land uses at interchanges and major
intersections with the metropolitan highway system
7. Trip generation rates for existing and proposed land uses at
interchanges and major intersections with the metropolitan highway
system, and relationship to capacity
8. Identification of proposed major traffic-generating development, other
than above, and planned trip generation rates
9. Maps of existing and proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities
10. Maps of existing and proposed transit service and facilities
o
~
"CI
10
o
11.
Schedule of improvements and upgrading to local road system
12. Discussion of relationship between local transportation plan and
regional transportation plan
IX. -AVIATION
A. INTRODUCTION
B. GOALS
C. CURRENT STATUS
D. ISSUES
E. PLAN
F. NECESSARY ACTION
Although there are no airports within the City, the Metropolitan Council
requires the local consideration of the Regional Aviation System. Care will
be given to address the following concerns:
1. Description of what airspace policy area the community or
development is located in (existing tall structure area, critical airspace,
protection airspace, airport search area or other airspace)
2. Policies on protection of airspace
3. Acknowledgement as to whether community contains or is in the
vicinity of an airport (maps showing airport property, aircraft noise
zones, airport airspace, land use safety zones)
4. Acknowledgement as to whether a proposed development will impact
air space (e.g., visual or electronic interference) and description of
measures to mitigate impact
5. Guidelines for land use compatibility with aircraft noise
6. Land use plan reflecting land use compatibility guidelines
7. Description of official controls to implement land use compatibility
guidelines, e.g., model noise attenuation ordinance
8. Policies on location, relocation and citing of public structures ill
aircraft noise impact areas
9.
Policies on extension of utilities into aircraft noise impact areas and
runway land use safety zones
o
~
\JJ
11
o
IX. IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
A. INTRODUCTION
B. - IDENTIFICATION OF IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
1. Land Use Plan
2. Zoning
3. Subdivision Regulations
4. Capital Improvement Program
5. Economic Development
6. Others
CONCLUSION
LIST OF FIGURE
LIST OF TABLES
6. Estimated Time Frame and Estimated Cost* for Proiect Completion. Based on the
proposed "Outline for Comprehensive Plan Documents" and past experience,
CONSULTAi~TS suggests the following time frame for project completion:
Work Element
Time Estimate
Estimated
Completion
Date
1. Organizational Meeting
a. Overview
b. Planning Process
c. Intergovernmental
Relationships and
Requirements
d. Goals, objectives,
and policies
2. Background Information
a. Research
b. Surveys
c. Base maps
d. Constraints
3. Utilities Plan**
1 month
October 1989
4 months
March 1990
2 months
May 1990
o
1\::1
\;Y
12
Work Element
Time Estimate
Estimated
Completion
Date
o
4. Housing Residential Land
Use Plan
5. Commercial Land Use Plan
6. Industrial Land Use Plan
7. Parks and Open Space Plan
8. Transportation Plan**
9. Implementation Tools
a. Land Use Plan Map
b. Capital Improvements Program
c. Identification of Other Tools
-10. Review and Revisions 1 month June 1991
11. Process With Met Council 90 days September 1991
12. Final Report Prep 1 month October 1991
ESTIMATED TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED
2 months
2 months
2 months
2 months
2 months
2 months
July 1990
September 1990
November 1990
January 1990
March 1991
May 1991
$39,200
. Cost estimates are based on previous experience for similar tasks. Although the estimated cost for completion of individual tasks
are thought to be reasonable, actual cost and estimated costs for individual tasks may vary due to unforeseen circumstances.
URBANAL YSIS may reallocate resources according to actual need.
.. The preparation of the Utilities and Transportation Plan will require engineering assistance outside the scope of this proposal.
URBANAL YSIS will work with a civil engineer appointed by the City of Andover for necessary support.
5. Meetings.' This AGREEMENT includes attendance by the CONSULTANT at
regularly scheduled Comprehensive Plan Task Force meetings (one meeting per
month). .
All special meetings and worksessions shall be scheduled at mutually convenient
times. The CONSULTANT shall be available to attend additional meetings over
and above those set forth in the above schedule, for which the compensation shall
be at the per diem rate as set forth in the compensation section of this
AGREEMENT.
6. Reports. The CONSULTANT shall provide to the Client, one copy of all reports
and memos prepared by his staff. Additional copies will be provided at cost for
time and materials.
7.
Personnel. The CONSULTANT represents that it has, or will secure at its own
expense, all personnel required to perform the service under this AGREEMENT
and that such personnel will be fully qualified to perform such services. All of the
o
f\).
~
13
o
services required herein will be performed by the CONSULTANT or under its
supervision. The CONSULTANT further represents that Robert L. Wuornos will
serve as the Principal Planner for this PROJEcr. The CLIENT shall have
complete review of all subcontractors who are providing services.
8.
Responsibilities of the CLIENT. It is understood that 1h.e CLIENT will have the
following responsibilities under this AGREEMENT:
a. Providing all available information, data, reports, records and maps to which
CLIENT has access and which are needed by the CONSULTANT for the
performance of the services provided. for herein.
b. Providing assistance and cooperation for the CONSULTANT in obtaining
any other needed material to which the CLIENT does not have ~ny direct
access.
c. Making available the services of the City staff in the conduct of work as
described in items a. and b. above.
All such CLIENT responsibilities shall be conducted in a timely manner and without
undue delay so as not to delay the CONSULTANT in the performance of its
services. In the event that the CLIENT fails to provide the information or services
required above in a timely and proper manner, it is agreed that the
CONSULTANT, after five (5) days written notice to the CLIENT, may proceed to
obtain such information and provide such services itself, for which it shall be
compensated in accordance with the schedule of per diem fees as hereinafter set
forth.
9. Compensation. The CLIENT shall compensate the CONSULTANT on an hourly
professional fee schedule outlined below, and the CLIENT will reimburse the
CONSULTANT for materials used in the process of this project.
Method of Pavment. The CONSULTANT shall submit itemized invoices and
compensation due shall be made in monthly payments for services completed by the
CONSULTANT. The CLIENT will reimburse the CONSULTANT within 15 days
of receipt of invoice.
Per Diem Schedule.
Senior Planners
Technician
Word Processing
Reimbursable Expenses*
$60.00/hour
$42.50/hour
$29.00/hour
At Cost
o
.Mileage. long distance phone calls, special equipment renta~ postage. and reproductions.
~
~
14
o
Retainer. The CLIENT will pay the CONSULTANT a retainer in the amount of
$2,000.00 prior to project start. The CONSULTANT will credit the retainer against
monthly billings at the rate of $100.00 per month until the total amount has been
fully credited.
Expert Witness. This AGREEMENT does not include the provision of expert
witnesses services by the CONSULTANT in connection with any matters which may
arise in relation to the services performed under this contract, either during or after
its compensation. The CLIENT does, however, agree to compensate the
CONSULTANT for any time and expense involved in connection with a subpoena
issued for a court appearance to testify as an expert witness concerning such
matters. The fee for such services shall be double the per diem rates quoted
above plus expenses.
10. Ownership of Materials. The final documents, text and graphics, as instruments of
service are and shall remain the property of the CLIENT. The CONSULTANT
reserves the right to retain for its files a photocopy of its final submission
documents.
The CONSULTANT'S responsibility for the PROJECT shall be limited to
information contained in the test and graphics prepared by it or under its
supervision.
11. Confidentiality of Information. Information obtained and reports prepared by the
CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall be considered to be confidential
and shall not be made available to any individuals or organizations by the
CONSULTANT without prior approval of the CLIENT.
12. Changes. The CLIENT may, from time to time, during the course of this
AGREEMENT, request modifications of it or changes in the Scope of Services to
be performed hereunder. Such changes including any increase or decrease in the
amount of the CONSULTANT's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon
by the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT, shall be incorporated by written
amendments to this AGREEMENT.
13.
Termination of AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be terminated without
cause by either the CLIENT or the CONSULTANT upon thirty (30) days written
notice. In such case, the CONSULTANT shall be compensated by the CLIENT
for all work satisfactorily completed prior to termination. In the event of such
termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, survey drawings,
maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by the CONSULTANT shall, at
the option of the CLIENT, become its property and the CONSULTANT shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for satisfactory work completed
o
Q
.-
..\
15
o on such materials.
14. Assignability. This AGREEMENT shall not be assigned or transferred by either
the CONSULTANT or the CLIENT without the prior written consent of the other.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the CONSULTANT shall not be prohibited
from contracting with qualified subconsultants or from assigning to a bank, trust
company or other financial institution any claims for compensation due, or to
become due, to the CONSULTANT from the CLIENT under this AGREEMENT,
without such prior written consent.
15. Conflict of Interest. The CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has no interest
which would conflict with the performance of the services required under the
AGREEMENT.
This AGREEMENT represents the entire and integrated agreement between the CLIENT
and the CONSULTANT and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or
agreements, either written or oral. This AGREEMENT may be amended only by written
instruments signed by both CLIENT and CONSULTANT.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CLIENT and CONSULTANT have executed this
AGREEMENT in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below.
CLIENT:
By
Date
Mayor, City of Andover
ATIEST:
By
Date
City Administrator
City of Andover
By
Date
Robert L. Wuomos
President
o
f"\).
\;J)
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October l1, 1989
,"1
ITEM
NO,
~"~~~ ~...u'"
Addition
..v~~y~n s
ORJGINATING DEPARTMENT
Plannlng ~
Jay Blake, Planner
BY:
APPIiC V 0 FOR
AGJ!'Nl,~ , \
BY:'YJ T\.
AGENDAHi1~CTION
NO. 4.
REQUEST
The Andover Housing and Redevelopment is asked to review the
enclosed bids for the two lots in Nordeen's Addition. The bid
from Feckut Home Builders Inc. is for both lots. The bid from
Rick Armagost is only for Lot 4, Block 1. This is the third time
the City has advertised the lots.
The City has reserved the right to reject any or all bids.
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
o
No, lfJ!7A
MILU:R/IlAVISCo.
Mion('apoli~.MN
DO NOT COI'Y
SulJiccttoCopyriRhll..oW8
WHITE-Office Copy I )
STANDARD YELLOW.Buy,,',CUpy ',70,'\ '\-
GREEN-Seller's Copy 'd ~t;'
PURCHASE AGREEMENT PINK.Buy,,', Re",ipt y'
A/a/ c/t': . Minnesota /LJ-/;2 .1~
,M.,.,." ~./4/. ~ r :?;; c;"
/?/d ~~,,<.
F""r'.i:,/T
./6S<::
? RECEIVED DF
3 the sum of Dollars ($
.. by as earnest money to be deposited the next business day after acceptance in trust account of listing broker
~; (unless otherwise specified in writing) and in part payment fOf the purchase of the premises legally described as
G.
8 located at IStreet Address) -:"" Y 15/,.(- ? ~:'" 9" /.5"/< / ~~'I' ~ ~
9 City of ~"'~(h"M' _ , County of ~~_ ,StateofMinnesota,
1/1 including all plants, shrubs and trees, all storm windows and/or inserts, storm doors, screens, awnings, window shades. blinds, curtain.
11 traverse-drapery rods, attached lighting fixtures with bulbs, plumbing fixtures, water heater, heating system, humidifier, central airconditioning,
1? electronic air filter, automatic garage door opener with controls. water softener, cable television outlets and cabling, BUILT-INS to include:
1:3 dishwasher, garbage disposal, tra h compactor, oven(s). cooktop stove, microwave oven, hood-fan, intercom. installed carpeting, IF ANY,
14. located on the premises which are the operty of Seller a 0 the following personal property:
15.
16.
./2 200
/
Dollars,
17
18
19
20.
21
all of which property Seller has this day sold to Buyer for the sum of: $
which Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner: Earnest money of $
$ /~ 700 cas onorbefore c.....-;::;.r......fl~
, ,
22 of $ by fin ncing as follows:
~a7.,;n::> and
./?-- *7" ~ nc..:!? / . the date of closing, and the balance
2:3
/':1.
7!J
7.'j
27
:>~.
:>9.
3\).
Attached ar8 _ addendums which are made a part of this agreement. ~
SUBJECT TO performance by Buyer, Seller agrees to execute and deliver a . -:...... ... ....,.a....I?~;~../.L. Warranty Deed,
to be joined in by spouse, if any, conveying marketable title to the premises subject only to the following exceptions:
(1) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Federal regulations. (2) Restrictions relating to use or improvement of the premises without
effective forfeiture provision. (3) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. (4) Utility and drainage easements
which do not interfere with present improvements. (5) Rights of tenants, if any.
37 REAL ESTATE TAXES Seller agrees to pay..Li:2./ 12ths and Buyer agrees to pay ~/ 12th. oltaxes due and payable in the year
3B 19 tt. Seller agrees to pay ~ / 12ths and Buyer agrees to pay -A- / 12ths of annual installment of special assessments due
39 and payable in the year 19/111. "IQ~J)C:.. agrees to IPA,;}(.:lll on the date of closing all special assessments levied and pending.
40 Buyer shall pay taxes due and payable in the year 19 !1t! and any unpaid installments of special assessments payable therewith
41 and thereafter. Seller warrants that taxes due and payable in the year 19 ~ will be .&C,* NOt!. S:'1"J \.\1,,;0:\,) l:lSIl I I
42 classification. Neither Seller nor Seller.s Agent makes any representation concerning the amount of future real estate taxes.
113 WARRANTIES Seller warrants that buildings, if any, are entirely within the boundary lines of the premises. Seller warrants that all
4,1 appliances, heating and air conditioning, wiring and plumbing used and located on the premises are in proper working order on date of closing.
Buyer has right to inspect premises prior to closing. Buyer shall satisfy himself/herself at his/her expense that all appliances; heating and air
conditioning, wiring and plumbing are in proper working order before closing. Seller warrants that the premises are connected to: city sewer
Dyes - 0 no; city water 0 yes - 0 no. If the premises are destroyed or substantially damaged by fire or any other cause before the
closing date, this agreement shall become null and void at Buyer's option, and the earnest mone shall be refunded to Buyer.
POSSESSION Seller a rees to deliver possession not later than closing.
All i est, cityw dsewercharges, electricity and ural9a rges, fuel oi and liquid petroleum gas shall be pro-rated between the
parties as . Seller a~(ee remove all debris and all personal property not included herein from the
premiseS" efore session date.
TITLE & EXAMINATION Seller shall, within a reasonable time after acceptance of this agreement, furnish an Abstract of Title. or a
Registered Property Abstract, certified to date to include proper searches covering bankruptcies, State and Federal judgments and liens. Buyer
5!~ shall be allowed 10 business days after receipt for examination of title and making any objections, which shall be made in writing or deemed
56 waived. If any objection is so made, Seller shall be allowed 120days to make title marketable. Pending correction of title, payments hereunder
51 required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title and within 10 days after written notice to Buyer, the parties shall perform this
!~8 agreement according to its terms, If title is not corrected within 120 days from the date of written objection, this agreement shall be null and
G::} void, at option of Buyer. neither party shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other, and earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer.
GO DEFAULT If title is marketable or is corrected within said time; and Buyer defaults in any of the agreements herein. Seller may terminate this
61 agreement, and on such termination all payments made hereunder shall he retained by Seller and Agent, as their respective interests may appear.
(3:2 as liquidated damages, time being of the essence hereof. This prC'Vision shall not deprive either party of the right of enforcing the specific performance
C 3 of this agreement. provided this agreement is not terminated and action to enforce spetific performance is commenced within six months after
1l.1 such right of action arises. In the event Buyer defaults in his performance of the terms of this Agreement, and Notice of Cancellation is
t;!'j served upon the Buyer pursuant to MSA 559.21, the termination period shall be thirty (30) days as permitted by Subdivision 4 of MSA
GG 559.21.
67 ACCEPTANCE Buyer understands and agrees that this sale is subject to acceptance by Seller in writing. Agent is not liable or responsible
GH on account of this agreement, except to return or account for the earnest money.
31.
37-
:J3
3~
35.
36.
dr.)
46
~7.
1.18
49
50
51
52
G3.
5,1
/;'1 AGENCY DISCLOSURE '. 'r (if i..r" 'II ('" Ilf ':v.r I' stipulates he or she Is representing the
/[1 In this transaction. The listing agent or broker stipulates he or she is representing the seller in this transactlon.
'"," '!Ir"
i'1 I, the owner of the premises, accept this agreement and
77 the sale hereby made.
I agree to purchase the premises for the price and on the terms and
conditions set forth above.
BUYER ~4 ~~----
--
i:' SELLER
I
,.,11 SELLER
BUYER
7~, Delivery of all papers and monies shall be made at the office of:
Company
Selling Agent
Address City Zip
Tl!IS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD. SEEK COMPETENT ADVICE.
o
o
12 October 1989
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
Dear Mr. Blake:
Please use the following information to submit a bid to the Andover HRA, in
my behalf, on Lot 4, Block 1 Nordeen's Addition - 15619 Kumquat Street.
Land
Specials
Total
Thank you,
&~
Rick Armagost
8372 Fairchild Av.
Moundsview, MN. 55112
Home - 784-2470
Work - 572-7442
$4,400.00
1,166.00
$5,566.00
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
Discussion Items
Engineering
<'*
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
5. Reject Bidsj89-10j
Seal coating
BY: Todd J. Haas
The city Council is requested to reject the bids for the 1989
sealcoating, Project 89-10. The bids are being rejected for the
following reasons:
1. It is too late in the season to start the project.
2. ASTECH was the contractor that did the City seal coating in
1988 and has yet to complete the job to our specifications.
The following is a list of the contractors that bid the job:
1. AS TECH
2. Allied Blacktop
The City staff will re-bid the project in spring, 1990.
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 89-10
FOR SEALCOATING CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF CITY STREETS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids, bids were received,
opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows:
AS TECH
Allied Blacktop
$76,949.57
$79,061. 46
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby reject all bids.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
Meeting this day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of
voting
the resolution, and Councilmen
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
october 17, 1989
DATE
ITEM
NO.
6. Accept Feasibility
Report/89-24
APPR.9-~ b FOR
AG EN '1'''
.~
'if- \L
BY:/~
V
The city Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering
the preparation of a feasibility report for the improvements of
89-24 for storm water detention pond as part of the Trunk storm
Sewer Concept Plan for the Andover Commercial park area.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
Engineering
~~x(.
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council requested a report be prepared but didn't do so
by resolution.
Also:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution receiving
the feasibility report and calling a public hearing on the
improvements of 89-24 for storm water detention pond as part of
the Trunk storm Sewer in the Andover Commercial Park area.
John Rodeberg from TKDA will be present at the meeting to discuss
this item with you.
The City Council needs to decide if we want to establish a trunk
assessment policy for the area and assess $1700 to $1800 per acre
for storm drainage trunk similar to how we assess water and sewer
trunk.
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENTS OF STORM WATER DETENTION POND AS PART OF THE TRUNK STORM
SEWER CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE ANDOVER COMMERCIAL PARK, PROJECT NO. 89-24.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover is cognizant of
the need for improvements, specifically Storm Water ponding and Trunk
storm Sewer in the following described area: S 1/2 Section 34; and
WHEREAS, the City Council proposes to assess the benefitting
property for all or a portion of the costs of the improvement,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council is cognizant of the need for improvements.
2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
day of
Meeting this
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
o
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING
ON IMPROVEMENTS OF STORM WATER DETENTION POND AS PART OF THE TRUNK
STORM SEWER CONCEPT PLAN, PROJECT NO. 89-24 IN THE ANDOVER COMMERCIAL
PARK AREA.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No.
day of October 17, 1989, a Feasibility Report
TKDA for the improvements; and
, adopted the
has been prepared by
WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the
17th day of October, 1989; and
WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be
feasible for an estimated cost of $62,400.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for
Project No. 89-24, for the improvements.
2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of abutting property
for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $62,400.00.
3.
A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvement on the day of
the Council Chambers of the City Hall at
Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of
hearing and improvement as required by law.
19 in
and the
such
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
Meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E.Elling - Mayor
o . t' lk
V1C or1a Vo - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
October 17, 1989
DATE
ITEM
NO.
7. Approve 1990 Law
Enforcement Contracl
BY: James E. Schrantz
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
C' ~
BY: J
J
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
The City Council is requested to approve the 1990 Law Enforcement
Contract.
Attached is the new amount with a sheet showing the breakdown. I
have included the 1989 contract figures for comparison.
The highlights are:
1. Personnel cost/Deputy is $5 per month less.
2. Administration has doubled.
3. Health insurance incurred $2136 to $2588/yr./deputy for a
total health insurance increase of $2938.
4. Dental insurance increased $175 to $370/yr./deputy for a
total dental insurance increase of $1268.
5. Closing allowance decreased from $450 to $400/yr./deputy for
a total closing allowance decrease of $325.
6. Worker's Compensation decreased by $350.
7. Vehicle cost increased by $3044.
8. Gas-oil-tires maintenance stayed the same.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
o TO
SECOND BY
o
Page Two
City Council Meeting - 10/17/89
Item 1t7
The total police budget is increased $14,519 or 3.9% over the 1989
contract before state Aid is deducted.
State Aid increased by $2055 or 7.9%.
After the state Aid adjustment, the increase is 3.6%.
Enclosures: Contract
Contract figures for 1989 & 1990
o
~ r -f~""""'iilIJlDlW-tlI:ul!!.~~f
Office of
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
KENNETH G. WILKINSON - SHERIFF
Courthouse - 325 East Main Street - Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612-421-4760
September 21, 1989
(
city of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Anoka, Mn. 55303
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Pursuant to our Law Enforcement Contract, the county of Anoka and
the Anoka County Sheriff's Office would like to renew the contract
for one year effective January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990.
Attached is a new rate schedule for thirty-two (32) hour coverage,
seven (7) days per week, showing a cost of $386,357.00. The
additional cost over the 1989 contract is driven by the County's
goal communicated to all County departments, of achieving recovery
of the most appropriate proportion of the actual costs incurred by
the County in providing services. To that end, the pricing of
contracts for service is subject to review by the Assistant to the
County Administrator and the Director of Accounting and central
Services.
The latest figure for money received from the State for Police
State Aid was $4,314.31 per officer. Although this figure is
determined by the state and is thus subject to fluctuation, this
would mean $28,043 applied to the cost of the 1990 contract,
leaving a net cost of $358,314.
If you have any questions, please call me at 421-4760, extension
1208.
Sincerely,
o
K. G. Wilkinson
sheriff
~7/~
By: Harold Netkow
captain, Administration
HN/mr
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
~
j
J
1
I
j
J
Office of
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
KENNETH G. WILKINSON - SHERIFF
Courthouse - 325 East Main Street - Anoka, . Minnesota 55303
612-421-4760
. CONTRACT FIGURES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1990
PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THIRTY-TWO (32) HOUR COVERAGE, 365 DAYS PER YEAR
(6.5 DEPUTIES REQUIRED) -~-
PERSONNEL
6 DEPUTIES AT $3,004 PER MONTH......................................$216,288
.5 DEPUTY AT $3,004 PER MONTH...,.................................. 18,024
OVERTIME - (AVERAGE OF 7 HOURS PER MONTH PER DUPUTY................ 14,194
ADMINISTRATION. . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16,566
TOTAL PERSONNEL. .................................................. .$265,072
BENEFITS
P.E.R.J\.. - 12% OF 5248,506.........................................$
SEVERANCE ALLOWANCE..................................... . . . . . . . . . . .
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION... ....... .... ............................
LIFE INSURANCE ($10,000.00) $36.00 PER YEAR PER DEPUTy.............
HEALTH INSURANCE ($2588 PER YEAR PER DEPUTy)................. ......
DENTAL INSURANCE ($370 PER YEAR PER DEPUTY). .......... .............
LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE (.0047 X SALARy)....................
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE ($400 PER YEAR PER DEPUTy)..... ... ........ .,. ...
WORKERS COMPENSATION...............................................
TOTAL BENEFITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
29,821
2,343
586
234
16,822
2,405
1,101
2,600
5,623
61,535
TWO POLICE EQUIPPED VEHICLES ($13,450).. .......... ...............,.$ 26,900
GAS, OIL, TIRES, REPAIRS, AND MAINTENANCE AT APPROXIMATELY
500 MILES PER DAY X 365 DAYS = 182,500 MILES AT $ .18 PER MILE.... 32,850
TOTAL VEHICLE AND UPKEEP................................ . . . . . . . . . . .:!i 59,750
TOTAL COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITy......... ... ................ .$386,357
LESS AMOUNT RECEIVED FROM STATE FOR POLICE STATE AID*.............. -28,043
NET COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITy.............................. .$358,314
*THIS FIGURE IS DETERMINED BY THE STATE AND IS SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATION. THE
LATEST FIGURE AVAILABLE IS $4,314.31 PER DEPUTY.
o
.J j I; ,?,--..
-.J I I ' (J __ -"
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
rr'-'-'
tm
..
Office of
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTiltJENT
KENNETH G. WILKINSON - SHERIFF
Cou.rlhQUJ' - 325 East Main Str'lIt . Anoka. MjnRllota 55303
612-421-4760
FACSIMILE TRANSMITT~~ MEMO
TOI
10/lol,f 'J
/ (
DATE.
J'AX
'156"- Fq~3
:::::~~~~~---;;vr;:-~~-;::-j--------------~---------- ,
DB>ARTHENT. . ()~6e t!.u~ ~ f)~
---------------------------.-------------------------------------
HUMBER OJ' :PAGElSI
I
PLUS THIS KElKOI
TOTAL * OF PAGESI
+ 1
bL
II' ALL PAGES ARE NOT RZCEIVED, PLEASE CALL 612/421-4100, EXT. ~
AFTER 4130 OR WEERENDS - 612/421-4761, EXT. lS9S
RIHARKS/COHKEHTSI
o
AWnmlllvu Awl/go I I;quOlOI Opportunltv l!inFoI..y.,v
, 0jJIH oJ
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DBPARTMBNT
DNNB1II G. 'fI1U1N1oN -IlIUJ"
..
C..,nl",," . Il$ EMI Mal'!.. "m' . A..., JlIII.....,. WfIJ
I1t1111"""
CONTRACT FIGURES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1989
PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THIRTY~TWO (32) HOURS or COVERAGE, 35? DAYS PER
YIAR (6.5 DEPUTIES REQUIRED)
PIRSONNIL:
811. DEPUTIES AT '3,009 PER MONTH................~..............216,648
.$ DEPUTY AT '3,009 PER MONTH.................................. 18,054
OVERTIME - (AVERAGE OF 7 HOURS PER MONTH PER DEPUTy).......... 14,218
ADMINISTRATION. . . . . . .. .. '. . . fI . .. . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . '. . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. . II ."f 8 t 2 sa8
TOTAL 'ERSONNEL........ ~ -. .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. t .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . .l ~ ~ 7 , 218
BENEFITS:
P.E.R.A. - 12~\ OF .248,920....................,..t...~......,..J
SEVERANCE ALLOWANCE I . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. ... . . . . .. .. .. , .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. '. .. . .. . . '.
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIFE INSURANCE ($10,000.00) '36.00 PER YEAR X 6.S DEPUTIES....
HEALTH INSURANCE - $2,136 PER YEAR X 6.5 DEPUTIES........ .....
DENTAL INSURANCE. 1175 PER YEAR X 6.5 DEPUTIES.......... .....
LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE (.0047 X SALkRY)...............
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE - $450 PER YEAR X 6.S DEPUTIES.............
WOJlKERS COMPENSATION.................... .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL. .Jl.ENEFITS. . . . . . " " .. . " . " . .. " " " .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . " .. .. .. .. .. " .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . ...
""'0 POLl CE VEtil CLI: S (J 11 , 92 e ) . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f
GAF, OIL, TIRES, REPAIRS, AND ~A!NTtNANC[ AT ~PPRCXIMATELY 500
MJLIS 'f~ DAY X "f D~Y$ = 181J~~g MJLES AT' ;)8 PER MJk~. ...
TO'JAI. VEHJ (;lE "Htl UP1(EtP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s
29,870
2,166
622
234
13,884
1,13'1
1,103
2,926
5,973
57, 914
23,856
32,850
!l6,'06
TOTAL COST TO CONTRACTING.MUNICIPALITY..........................371,838
LESS AMOUNT RECEIVED FROM STATE FOR POLICE STATE AID....:.....w 25,988-
NET COST TO CONTRACTING MUNICIPALITY..........................'3C5,S50
-THIS FIGURE IS DETERMINED BY THE STATE AND IS SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATION. THE
AMOUNT FOR 1987 WAS S3,998.23 PER DEPUTY.
o
.Hb.",..._ &M'- 11ll.....1 ~......... __..1_
o
LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 19 ,by and between the COUNTY OF ANOKA and the
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF, herein after referred to as the "COUNTY" and
the CITY OF ANDOVER, hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY",
for the period of January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990;
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Municipality is desirous of entering into a
contract with the County, through the Office of the county Sheriff,
for the performance of the law enforcement functions hereinafter
described within the corporate limits of said Municipality; and
WHEREAS, the County is agreeable to
and law enforcBment functions on the
hereinafter set forth; and
rendering such services
terms .and conditions
WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by
. M.S. Sec. 471.59 and M.S. 436.05;
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid
statutes, and in consideration of the mutual covenants expressed
herein, it is agreed as follows:
1. PURPOSE
The County, through its County Sheriff, agrees to provide
pOlice protection within the corporate limits of the Municipality
to the extent and in the manner as hereinafter set forth.
2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY COUNTY
A. Except as otherwise hereinafter specifically set forth,
such services shall encompass the duties and functions
of the type normally coming within the jurisdiction of
the Anoka County Sheriff pursuant to Minnesota Law, and
in addition, the Sheriff and his duly assigned deputies
shall, within the Municipality's corporate limits,
exercise all the police powers and duties of city police
officers as provided by M.S. 436.05.
B. The rendition of services, the standard of performance,
the discipline of the deputies, and other matters
incident to the performance of such services and the
control of personnel so employed, shall remain in and
under the sole control of the Sheriff.
o
1
"
o
C.
such services shall include
Minnesota state statutes, and
of the city of Andover.
the enforcement of the
the municipal ordinances
D. The County shall furnish and supply all necessary labor,
supervision, equipment, and communication facilities for
dispatching, jail detention (including the cost of such
detention), and daily patrol service as specified in
Paragraph 2.E. of this Agreement, -and shall be
responsible for the direct payment of any salaries,
wages, or other compensation to any County personnel
performing services pursuant to this contract.
E. The County agrees to provide law enforcement protection
as follows: For the period of January I, 1990 through
December 31, 1990, the Sheriff's Office will provide
thirty-two (32) hours per day of daily patrol service 365
days per year. Said daily patrol service shall be
exercised,through the employment of two patrol cars, to
be supplied, equipped, and maintained by the County, and
staffed by Sheriff's deputies. Further, said daily
patrol service will provide and fulfill those services
and duties ordinarily provided and fulfilled by city
police officers as provided by state law and municipal
ordinances. The Sheriff, upon consultation with the Law
Enforcement Committee created pursuant to Paragraph 6
herein, shall determine the time of the day during which
the patrol service shall be provided. The Sheriff may
periodically change the times of patrol service in order
to enhance the effectiveness of the coverage.
F. The County patrol cars used for prOViding the services
pursuant to the CONTRACT, shall be stored on premises
owned by the Municipality. In the event that a suitable
and secure storage location is not provided, in the
determination of the Sheriff, the patrol cars will be
returned to the Sheriff's Office at the end of each
shift.
3. DUTIES OF MUNICIPALITY
A. It is agreed that the Sheriff shall have all reasonable
and necessary cooperation and assistance from the
Municipality, its officers, agents, and employees, so as
to facilitate the performance of this agreement.
B. This contract shall not alter the responsibility for
prosecution of offenses occurring within the Municipality
as is currently prOVided by law. Likewise, collection
and distribution of fine monies shall be controlled in
the manner provided by law.
o
2
COMPENSATION/TERM
o
4.
The Municipality hereby agrees to pay to the County the sum
of $386,357.00 for law enforcement protection as herein specified
for the year 1990. Said contract sum is payable in four (4) equal
installments with the first installment due on April 1, 1990, with
remaining installments due on July 1, 1990, October 1, 1990, and
December 31, 1990.
5. RENEWAL
This contract may be renewed for a successive period of one
(1) year. said renewal shall be accomplished in the following
manner:
A. Not later than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the
expiration of the current contract, the County, through
its County Sheriff, shall notify the Municipality of its
intention to renew. Said notification shall include
notice of any increase in total contract cost.
B. Not later than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration
of the current contract, the Municipality shall notify
the Sheriff of its intention to renew and its acceptance
of increased costs.
C. The renewal shall be officially approved by the parties'
respective governing bodies prior to expiration of the
current contract.
6. LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE
The County, through its County Sheriff or his designees,
agrees to meet, from time to time, with any duly designated law
enforcement committee of the Municipality. The purpose of said
meetings shall be to make suggestions for improvement in the
implementation of this contract or for amendments thereto,
provided, however, that no such suggestion or amendment shall be
binding on either party until reduced to writing and duly signed
by the parties hereto. The membership of said committee, and the
time and place of said meetings, shall be determined by the
Municipality with reasonable notice to the Sheriff.
7. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS
All funds disbursed by the County or the Municipality pursuant
to this Agreement shall be disbursed by each entity pursuant to the
method provided by law.
o
3
o
8.
STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY
A strict accounting shall be made of all funds, and reports
of all receipts and disbursements shall be made upon request by
either: party.
9. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
In accordance with Anoka County's Affirmat~ Action Policy
and the county Commissioners' policies against discrimination, no
person shall illegally be excluded from full-time employment rights
in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to
discrimination in the program which is the subject of this
Agreement on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, marital status,
public assistance status, age, disability, or national origin.
10. TERMINATION
This agreement may be terminated by either party at any time
with or without cause upon not less than 120 days written notice
delivered by mail or in person to the other party. Notices
delivered by mail, shall be deemed to be received two (2) days
after mailing. Such termination shall not be effective with
respect to services rendered prior to such notice of termination.
11. NOTICE
For purposes of delivering any notices hereunder, notice shall
be effective delivered to the Anoka County Sheriff, 325 East Main
street, Anoka, MN. 55303, on behalf of the County; and the city
Manager of the city of Andover, 1685 crosstown Boulevard N. W. ,
Anoka, MN. 55303, on behalf of the MuniCipality.
12. INDEMNIFICATION
The City of Andover and the County mutually agree to indemnify
and hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs,
expenses, or damages, injuries or sickness resulting from the acts
or omissions of the respective offices, agents, or employees,
relating to the activities conducted by either party under this
agreement.
13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING
It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the
parties is contained herein and that this agreement supersedes all
oral and written agreements and negotiations between the parties
relating to the subj ect matter hereof, as well as any previous
agreement presently in effect between the parties relating to the
o
4
o
o
subj ect matter thereof. Any
modifications of the provisions of
only when they have been reduced to
parties herein.
alterations, variations, or
this Agreement shall be valid
writing and duly signed by the
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipality, city of Andover, by
resolution duly adopted by its governing body, has caused this
agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its Clerk, and
-the COUNTY OF ANOKA, by resolution of the County Board of
Commissioners, has caused this agreement to be signed by the Anoka
County Sheriff, the Chairman of the Anoka County Board of
Commissioners, and attested by the County Administrator, all on the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
Mayor
Chairman, Anoka County Board
of Commissioners
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
John "Jay" McLinden
County Administrator
Anoka County Sheriff
Approval of form and execution:
Assistant Anoka county Attorney
5
o
DATE
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Staff and Committees
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
October l7, 1989
ITEM
NO.
8. 1989 Year-to-Date
Review
Finance
Howard Koolick ~
BY: Finance Di rector
REQUEST
BY:
The Andover City Council is requested to review the enclosed
year-to-date data that they requested.
BACKGROUND
At the previous council meeting, City Council requested a more
accurate picture of our current year activity compared to budget.
Attached to this memo is a two page summary showing the budget and
expenditures by department.
The following analysis should help provide a more accurate picture
of the current situation.
Balance per department
summary
Estimated portion of 9/28 payroll
attributable to general fund
(Approximately 90% based on
reviews of other payrolls
$23,577 x 90%)
Equal portion of benefits
attributable to general
fund
Items received but unpaid as known
by Frank Stone
Repair of city hall tennis court
Total
$ 1,478,060
21,220
5,940
10,000
3,750
$ 1,518,970
This amount represents approximately 74% of the 1989 budget.
"
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
:-1
GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY
JANUARY THRU SEPTEMBER
o
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Ci ty Council
Committees
NeJltsletter
Mayor
Elections
Administration
Financial Administration
Accounting
Audi ting
Assessing
Attorney
Planning & Zoning
Total General Government
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
Ci ty Hall
Fire Station
Public Works Building
Senior Citizen Center
Cold Storage Building
Total Government Building
PUBLIC SAFETY
Engineering
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Rescue Service
Protective Inspection
Civil Defense
Animal Control
Total Public Safety
PUBLIC WORKS
Streets & Highways
Snow & Ice Removal
Street Lighting
Street Signs-General
Total Public Works
o
1989
BUDGET
36,121
1,550
6,150
5,050
5,000
65,103
45,068
81,309
11,000
23,100
46,300
65,209
390,960
40,999
19,584
25,687
10,480
5,356
102,106
77 , 704
338,823
232,669
39,491
132,660
26,285
12,100
859,732
214,611
109,992
15,000
21,183
360,786
1989
ACTUAL
19,804
60
5,039
3,024
6
60,947
27,269
6l,259
12,392
25,465
52,910
47,067
315,242
58,447
7,303
15,376
3,652
o
84,778
62,048
192,259
101,472
7,620
98,161
46,758
7,834
516,152
131,839
75,064
28,770
12,324
247,997
BUDGET
REMAINING
16,317
1,490
1,111
2,026
4,994
4,156
17,799
20,050
-1,392
-2,365
-6,610
18,142
75,718
-17,448
12,281
10,311
6,828
5,356
17,328
15,656
146,564
131,197
3l,871
34,499
-20,473
4,266
343,580
82,772
34,928
-13,770
8,859
112,789
PERCENT
REMAINING
45.17%
96.13%
18.06%
40.12%
99.88%
6.38%
39.49%
24.66%
-12.65%
-10.24%
-14.28%
27.82%
19.37%
-42.56%
62.71%
40.14%
65.15%
100.00%
16.97%
20.15%
43.26%
56.39%
80.70%
26.01%
-77.89%
35.26%
39.96%
38.57%
31. 75%
-91.80%
41.82%
31. 26%
o
o
GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY
JANUARY THRU SEPTEMBER
1989
BUDGET
1989
ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
SANITATION
storm Sewers
Trees & Weed Control
25,681
3,685
7,23l
2,864
10,095
18,450
821
Tota~ Sanitation
29,366
19, 271
PARKS AND RECREATION
Parks and Recreation
229,747
229,747
154,547
154,547
75,200
75,200
Total Park & Recreation
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE
Unallocated
Improvement projects
Other Financing Uses
Traffic Signals
Recycling
Total Misc. Expenditures
77 , 300
2,000
7,400
87,778
3,375
50,324
1,494
6,278
149,249
-10,478
-1,375
-42,924
-1,494
-6,278
-62,549
86,700
=========== =========== ===========
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
2,059,397
1,478,060
581,337
please note that the above does not include the following:
September 28th payroll totaling $23,577, a portion of
which is water and sewer
Group Health, Medcenters and PHP bills paid in Sept.
totaling $6,600, a portion of which is water and sewer
Attorney bill totaling $8,292 a portion of which is
allocated to other funds
PERCENT
REMAINING
71.84%
22.28%
65.62%
32.73%
32.73%
-13.55%
-68.75%
-580.05%
-72 .14%
-----------
-----------
28.23%
city Council Meeting
October 17, 1989
Year-to-Date Review
o
The City Council also requested options available to lessen the
projected shortfall.
Option lt1 - Cease all capital outlay for the remainder of year,
unless an additional fun~ing source is available to
pay for the item.
Option lt2 - Eliminate all conferences, conventions, and meetings
for the remainder of the year.
Option lt3 - Eliminate all paid overtime for City employees.
Option lt4 - Limit supply orders to items that are absolutely
necessary.
Option lt5 - Have City staff determine if there may be surplus
equipment which the city could sell.
. ..
Option lt6 - Decrease the number of staff and reassign duties
to decrease employee costs.
Option lt7 - Begin assessing for seal coating in
this expense from the general fund.
pertains to future years).
Option lt8 - Do not publish the November/December newsletter.
Savings will be roughly $1,000 for printing plus
postage.
order to eliminate
(This option
Option lt9 - Decrease he number of people receiving packets for
City Council meetings. This will save on paper and
wear and tear on the copiers. It will also decrease
the information people have relating to council items.
There is no way to determine the possible savings these options
may generate. Should Council be interested in exploring one more
of these options in depth, the finance staff would be pleased to
do the research necessary, once given the proper parameters.
These options are not the only options available to Council. The
finance staff would be open to any suggestions Council may have
either before or at the meeting.
Finally, we will try to have a revenue comparison for you at the
meeting along with any additional information you may request.
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee
DATE October 17. 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administratio
9
BY: V. Volk
OR
ITEM Amend Res. Ol2-89
NO.
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution
which amends Resolution No. 012-89, setting fees for permits,
etc.
The attached resolution contains fees that we neglected to add to
the resolution when it was originally adopted in 1986.
V:Attach.
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 012-89, SETTING FEES FOR
PERMITS, REZONINGS, SPECIAL USE PERMITS, VARIANCES, ETC.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
The following fees are added to Resolution No. 012-89:
Type of Fee
Moving of Buildings
Up to 350 square feet
351 to 600 square feet
601 to 824 square feet
825 square feet and over
Sign Permits (per sq. ft.)
Boarding of horses
Impoundment of horses
Transportation (trailer rental)
Variance
Recording Fee
Fee
Ordinance
4
$15.00
25.00
50.00
75.00
.50
10.00/day
25.00/hr/man
40.00
40.00
10.00
8
23
23
23
23
23
day of
, 19
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
Attest:
Victoria Volk
City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
James E. Elling - Mayor
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17,
ITEM
NO.
Met. Council MDIF
OR~GINATING DEPARTMENT
p anning ~
Jay Blake lanner
BY:
AGENDA SEaJ10N .
NO. Statf, Commlttee,
Commission
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the enclosed copy of
the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework, Systems
Statement for the City of Andover.
BACKGROUND
Several concerns should be highlighted:
1. The City's population forecasts for the year 1990 and 2000 are
severely understated.
2. The employment estimates are also understated.
3. The Metropolitan Council's policies continue to suggest a "one
for ten and four for forty" rural development policy. the
City should continue to be concerned about this issue, as the
City of Ramsey has been forced into accepting this rural
development policy.
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
CONTENTS
Introduction
I. Transportation Development Guide/Polic.., Plan
A. Introduction
B. Significant Policy Changes
C. Metropolitan Highway System Facilities
D. Transit Services and Facilities
II. Wasterwater Treatment and Handling Polic.., Plan
A. Policy Plan Revisions and System Information
B. Determining Whether a Plan Amendment is Necessary
C. Format and Content of Plan Amendments
D. Advisories
III. Metropolitan Development Investment Framework
A. Geographic Policy Areas
B. Forecasts of Population, Households and Employment
C. Data Sheet with Forecasts and MUSA Land Supply ILand Demand
D. MUSA Map
E. Plan Amendment Process
Attachments:
A. Transportation Development Guide/Polic.., Plan
B. Wasterwater Treatment and Handling Polic.., Plan
C. Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework
D. Metropolitan Council Guidelines for Reviewing Local
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
E. Transit Service Needs Assessment Subarea Market Analvsis
rl------
o
o
INTRODUCTION
The 1988 Metropolitan Systems Information Statement is the Metropolitan
Council's annual description of changes made during 1988 in the Council's
metropolitan system policy plans. This statement explains how these changes
may impact your community. The statement also provides our most current
information on the affected metropolitan systems located in or serving your
communi ty.
In 1988, the Council adopted new policy plans for wastewater treatment and
handling (sewers) and for transportation. Copies of these two policy plans are
included as attachments, to this systems information statement.
There are three parts to the Metropolitan Systems Information Statement:
Part I describes the significant policy changes in the. new tra.nsportation
policy plan, the impacts of these policy changes on your community and
recommended amendments to the local transportation and land use plans,
information about the metropolitan highway and transit system facilities
or services within your community, a discussion of the relationship
between land use' and socioeconomic forecasts, data tables on 2010 system
forecasts and advisory information.
Part II provides information on the new wastewater management policy plan,
how the changes may affect your community, criteria for determining
whether a sewer plan amendment is needed, the format for submi'tting the
amendment and advisDry information.
Part III provides information about elements of the Council's 1986
Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF) that concern
metropolitan system services. Information in this section is not based on
any policy changes in the MDIF in 1988. However, the system policy plans
are based on the Council's regional goals and policies, as stated in the
MDIF. Community' plans must be consistent with the MDIF, as well as with
the individual system policy plans.
o
I. TRANSPORTATION
A. Introduction
The ~etropolitan Council has revised the Transportation Development
Guide/Policy Plan. Andover needs to determine whether a local
comprehensive plan amendment is necessary to demonstrate consistency with
the revised transportation poliCY plan. Andover should consult the full
text of the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan in preparing any
amendments to its local plan.
B. Significant Policy Changes
Significant transportation issues will affect this region over the next 20
years. These issues include:
the growing,commuter traffic on the region's highways,
the need for expensive replacement and improvement of much of the
region's highway and transit infrastructure, and
the inadequacy of transportation funding to accomplish these
improvements.
Because it is impossible for the region to build its way out of congestion,
the revised Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan is based on a
"constrained-demand" approach. The plan I s premise is that careful
management of the regional transportation system can help maintain the good
access to regional opportunities that exists today, despite the large
growth in travel demand expected in the future.
The Council's Metrooolitan Develooment Investment Framework (MDIF), which
sets overall priorities for regional facilities and services and the Twin
Cities Metropolitan Area, forms the basis for the revised policy plan. The
MDIF's objective is to focus urban development within the metropolitan
urban service area (MUSA), and to encourage and protect agricultural
activity in the rural service area.
Because the Council has amended the Transportation Development Guide/Policy
Plan Andover needs to assess whether comprehensive plan amendments are
needed to address highway and transit issues.
1 . Highways
The 2010 metropolitan highway system is shown in Figure 1.
Andover should expect increased traffic levels through 2010 both on the
metropolitan highway system and on local arterials and collectors. The new
Transportation bevelopment Guide/Policy Plan recommends a mixture of
capacity improvements and traffic management strategies to address those
future traffic problems within the MUSA.
o
State and local units of goverr~ent are expected to provide a minor
arterial system that is adequate to accommodate shorter trips (less than
five miles), eliminating these trips from the metropolitan highway system
(see policy plan Appendix F).
o
o
Andover's comprehensive plan should contain a street and highway
component that includes a minor arterial and collector system adequate
to handle local traffic. This system should take short trips off the
metropolitan highway system and provide continuous travel through
adjacent communities.
2. Land-Use/Transportation Relationships
A common theme throughout the revised policy plan is the need for
compatibility between land use and the capacity of the transportation
system. The metropolitan highway system should be protected from locally
generated trips that exceed the capacity of transportation facilities.
Should capaCity problems occur, the Council expects local initiatives to
help correct them.
o Andover's comprehensive plan should evaluate the potential impact of
planned l~nd use on the metropolitan highway system. Land-use
stra~egies should be developed in conjunction with highway system
management strategies to ensure that locally generated traffic does
not exceed the metropolitan highway system capacity. These land-use
strategies should also reflect Andover's plans to coordinate new
development with the staging of transportation improvements.
This systems statement gives the Council an opportunity to once again take
a close look at the development forecasts being used to plan the future
regional systems. The Council is requesting all local units of government
to help refine the 2010 forecasts and to provide information on maximum
allowable levels of development.
Section IE includes 2010 population, household and employment forecasts by
traffic analysis zone (TAZ) for Andover. These forecasts, developed for
the purpose of siZing transportation facilities, rely heavily on existing
land uses and may not accurately reflect the planned distribution of each
element (population, households and employment) as found in the local
comprehensive plan.
o Andover should review the TAZ level forecasts and, if necessary,
submit suggested revisions by June 1, 1989. Any redistribution
at the TAZ level should be consistent with the 2010 municipal totals
for population, households and employment. By Oct. 1, 1989, Council
staff will finalize the 2010 forecasts based upon communities' input
and negotiations with city staff, if necessary, and will determine
whether those changes will further affect the metropolitan highway
system.
o
Since trip generation varies by land-use type and intensity, and since more
and more jobs have located in suburban areas at increasingly higher
intensities, the need for detailed land-use intensity data has become
critical. Section IE includes conversion factors by land-use type that
will allow calculation of theoretical levels of maximum development. The
Council needs this information to assess the potential impact of local
community plans on the regional transportation system if areas of the
community were developed at the maximum allowable level.
o
o
The land use component of Andover's comprehensive plan should include
a section that translates planned and zoned use and intensity of
development into density factors such as employees per acre and square
footage of constructed space. The Council is requesting each city to
identify the maximum amount of development by land-use type that is
-allowable for vacant property or property planned for redevelopment.
The Council understands this level of development or activity may not
be consistent with the 2010 TAZ forecast. Communities should
calculate a theoretical level of maximum development using its
estimate of vacant land and the conversion factors found in Section
IE. The Council will use this information to determine impacts on the
metropolitan highway system.
3. Transit
The revised policy plan (which defines transit as all forms of riding
together) makes a significant commitment to reverse the trends of declining
transit ridership and auto occupancy. The plan states that ridesharing and
special transportation for elderly and disabled people are appropriate
service types in the rural service area. An aging population and overall
population growth in ~~e rural areas will warrant increased special
transportation and rideshare services through 2010.
~
o
o
o
? .
c. Metropolitan Highway System Facilities
The metropolitan highway system is shown in Figure 1. Appendix F of the
Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan describes the functional
classification of these roadways, interstate freeways and other principal
arterials, as well as local highways and roads.
No metropolitan system highways are located directly within Andover.
ANDOV
o
o
(c) Light Rail Transit Service Needs
Each county has established a regional railroad authority which is responsible for light rail
transit (LRT) planning and implementation. The Transportation Development GuidelPolicy
Plan advocates preserving linear rights-of-way, such as abandoned railroad lines and
surplus roadway rights-of-way, for future public use, including LRT. The City of
Andover should work with the county to address these issues.
4. Implementing Transit Services and Facilities
The Regional Transit Board can provide technical assistance in examining or implementing
transit services. The city should also be actively involved in these efforts.
o
D. Transit Services and Facilities
1. Introduction
The infonnation contained in this section is derived from the revised policy plan and from the
Regional Transit Board's (RTB) Transit Service Needs Assessment and other studies. This
section identifies the existing metropolitan transit service and facilities, and identifies potential
improvements to the system. The City of Andover should work with the RTB in amending the
transit element of its comprehensive plan if needed.
2. Existing Transit Services
Existing transit services in Andover are outlined below. For more detail on transit services, see
Attachment E: RTB's Transit Service Needs Assessment Subarea Market Analysis.
(a) Existing Regular Route Services
There is no regular route transit service in the City of Andover.
(b) Existing Ridesharing and Travel Demand Management Efforts
Minnesota Rideshare provides rideshare services to employers, communities, and
individuals in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Minnesota Rideshare provides pool
matching services to individuals, localized and regional marketing, and technical assistance
to employers and others in developing rideshare programs at the work site_
(c) Existing Park-and-Ride Lots
There are no park-and-ride lot locations within the City of Andover. Park-and-ride lots are
available within the cities of Coon Rapids and Anoka.
(d) Existing Elderly and Disabled Services
Special transportation services are provided for elderly and disabled people in Andover by
Anoka County.
3. Transit Service and Facility Needs
The following needs and strategies have been identified to improve transit service in the CIty of
Andover.
(a) Regular Route Service Needs
Regular route services are not appropriate in Andover, as it is outside the Transit Taxing
District and MUSA Une.
(b) Ridesharing and Travel Demand Management Needs
Services are available through Minnesota Rideshare.
(c) Transit Facility Nee~
There are no transit facility needs within the City of Andover.
(d) Elderly and Disabled Service Needs
o
The City of Andover should evaluate the need for special services within the city in
conjunction with surrounding communities.
r------- --
o
o
E. Land Use and Socio-economic Forecast Relationships
As part of responding to new directives in the policy plan, Andover will
need to demonstrate that its land use plan is related to its forecasts for
households and employment at the Traffic Assignment Zone (TAZ) level.
This.section provides 2010 population, household and employment forecasts
for each TAZ located within Andover. 1980 Census data is provided at the
TAZ level for comparison. Andover should review the TAZ level forecasts in
Table 1 and, if necessary, submit suggested revisions by June 1, 1989. Any
redistribution at the TAZ level should be consistent with the 2010
municipal totals for population, households and employment. By Oct. 1,
1989, Council staff will finalize the 2010 forecasts based upon the
community's input and negotiations with city staff, if necessary, and will
determine whether those changes will further affect the metropolitan
highway system.
In addition to the TAZ forecasts, information is provided in this section
regarding conversion factors by land use type that will allow calculation
of theoretical levels of maximum ~evelopment.
The city should compile the land use data for each TAZ in Andover, using
the land use categories and conversion factors found in Table 2. The city
should also differentiate. between existing development and additional
development anticipated by 2010. If either the categories or the
conversion factors are not applicable or workable in Andover, please
contact the Council 'so we can resolve this issue prior to the completion of
a plan amendment. The city will note that several commonly used land use
categories are not listed in the table. These include public and semi-
publiC uses and vacant and agricultural land. Tnese categories were not
included because' they tend not to contribute to peak hour traffic.
ANDOV
'" ,
,
,
,
,
[0
,
,
'" ,
'" ,
,
> ,
<X ,
<[ ,
:l ,
<X , '"
:0 , >- 000 0
w , w '" '"
u. , <X
,
,
> ,
<[ ,
a ,. '"
'J'l , >- 00'" '"
w , w '" '"
Z , <X
a ,
w ,
3 ,
,
'" ,
0 , '"
, do
'" , :i: 0....'" 0
, w 0"'0 0 0
, >- ... '"
, 0 0
, >- '"
, Vl
, 0>-0
, .JZ>-
, ow
, oo :I::i:Vl
N , do l.iJ>lX
<[ , :i: "'0'" 0 <110 UL
>- , w "''''0 :::l -J u..
, >- '" '" adoW
> , a =:i:<x
:0 , >- W
, .J ><
Vl , <[.J_
>- , >-_u.
Vl , o<[u.
<[ >->-::J
" <X '" llUJVl
W W ::J "''''''' 0 :l<X
<X > :I: "''''''' 0 :I: " -
0 0 >- oo"'''' 0 >->-'"
u. 0 a '" '" ow
z >- >-<xw
<J <[ :I:
" >-
:i: W
a :i:
z <[ '" z>-
0 Z ::J "'0'" '" azO
u > :I: -"'''' '" -woo
W >- >- "''''''' ... >-:i:'"
a '" <[>-
0 <J >- -'0
:l.Ja
<J Q.do>-
a O:i:
Vl Q.wVl
<X
'" .J.JW
do -...'" 0 <[<[u.
W 0 "''''... 0 >->-w
.J do ",oo- 0 OO<X
:0 >- tn-Ol '" >->-
<[ 0 " 11 ><
>- >- Q.do-
a:i:u.
Q.wu.
>->-::J
aoVl
oo >->-
do Ol
0 ....-'" ....
do "'-.... oo W
>- ...-.... '" :I:
0 "'-... '" >-
>-
N ..."''''
<[ (D'\Q to
>- .........
'" "'...'" W
aJ :i:
0 <[
Z
>
, >-
, <J
,
,
,
,
,
,
0:
II
o
o
TABLE 2
LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS
RESIDENTIAL II
Very low densityllll
Low densityllll
Medium low density
Medium high density
High density
Very high density
Less than one unit/acre
1-3 units/acre
4-6 units/acre
7-12 units/acre
13-24 units/acre
Over 24 units/acre
II Communities may collapse the number of discrete categories as appropriate to
their individual circumstances.
III1Very low and low density will be calculated on a gross density basis
(including streets, open space, etc). Multi-family categories will be
calculated on a net basis.
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Office
Retail
Industrial
Warehouse
3.3 employees/1000 square feetll
2 employees/1000 square feetll
2 employees/1000 square feet.
1.3 employees/1000 square feet.
Mixed use
Public and semi-public
Local determination
Local determination
. Communities may use another value if they adequately document the reasons for
differing with this value.
These values are based on rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers
and actual measured rates in the Twin Cities.
JM3243
OF.
Igure 1
RECOMMENDED METROPOLITAN
HIGHW A Y SYSTEM. 2010
_ Additional Highway Segments
ANOKA
-@]
WASHINGTON
CARVER
\
\
)
(
\
"'.- r--
- ,
SCOTT
DAKOTA
o
ign 2
El'r'OPOLlTAN TRANSIT
YSTEM, 2010
Central CIty Regular Route Service
j- --,=c~,~ --0;;;;;;;'- -1- --1
'~ ~ I
i - .,,, 'c'" ,.' , """'",, ____ i
I '1
I .....It I
~ ~--~---
co. "L,~''''- I'~~ I.
,...'" ",."" I 'o:-'~', ',~',',,~ I ','..,
+++ Proposed LRT Corridors
oDowntown and Raglonal Business
Concentration Circulator Services
o
[J
o
o
.
Fully Developed Suburban Services
Developing Area Services
Rural Paratransit
Freestanding Growth
Center Circulators
I
I
I
I
---T---j
I ~"'f[.no"'...
, I
: ,....'w"., I
, 'n'
_____~__-_~~IU
"("~""""'l' cdi....,(~
:J~O.(TTO
I"'O('("'O[HC[' IlllEorN" .
r" ' ,
,-.:':::~~~~.:~~~~---J
~".. ';.. :'.'~ Q'" ~ i
I "',..'
I ,.,.c~,..1t
I CARveR co.
-----~-----~-----
I 1'1.."....".
tJl
.,.,:~,'o..': .' -, ,.P' ~I '
~ I r l "'''.ILI.!' r-..,~ 1." '
"'''.'UIG I . , ___.-__ __---.J__
---!L -~.,.- -:- - TI -.:-:-.--:,,~~ .- - .- -- II . rl Y1'- ./'" U
.t w....ll ' ~l
, 'I I lAIUYllU I I ," "~"'''_M''
------t ....NOLEH.EM ';PIIINtiL.l.M.E ! _Cfl:!'or I ...."'II~ U
I I I ~I.I:" ~,A 1,....,..u,GTON I VUMltLIOH
I '~SCOTT CO. ~' I
I ~r Lt.mn'H I: I lO_DAN I I I
~:,-=,::I---~----I- ----t~~-------- --T-----2
I I 'f I .~......M....~r I \~ ONI:WfllIllI
I . . I I ~ M....'tOH' .. I
i.'''' P,,,", I "H'"< ~ C '"" '''' J ..~ I ",,,., : .''''"'.: ".""'n"' ~:::.r"'1
I l' .,......,J I ~'o+' I ~ ~
___L____ _ r1.l. 1 ----..,J---'---,...---~- ---
~ -r..::r- - - - - - - - - ! I I :iiM~~~;:~I'''
I ii" w~
MIlES 10 15 20 25 I .~H",:'..~ ~"~:'fUH":1 ~ W'~
I I" ". J
i____l.-J__
)'1. '(..o~u.~~"
..o..oooc::J: I
I
.........
ItOstMOUNT
o
o
1988 Systems Information Statement
Andover
II. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
Andover (Developing Community with Metro Service)
A. Policv Plan Revisions And System Information
Information in this section is based upon the revised Water Resources
Mana~ement. Part 1. Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy ,Plan, September,
1988 (copy enclosed).: The Policy Plan should be,.consulted by Andover in
preparing an amendment to the sewer element (sewer policy plan) of its
comprehensive plan. Of. particular importance to Andover will be the policies
related to water quality and sanitary sewer services, and the "Content
Requirements for Local ~Sewer Plans," (see Section C below).
1. Metropolitan Service (Developing Area)
The forecasts of population, households, employment, and wastewater flows for
Andover as contained in the adopted Wastewater Treatment and Handlin~ Policv
~ are listed below. These forecasts are for sewered development. The
sewered housing forecasts were calculated by multiplying the Council's
household forecasts for each year by the vacancy ratio for each community.
The community's projected total population, households, and employment for
1990 and 2000, as indicated later in Part III, could be somewhat different due
to the'development served by on-site sewage disposal systems or private
treatment plants.
1990 2000 2010
Sewered
Population 5,800 6,400 7,000
Sewered
Housing 2,000 2,300 2,600
Sewered
Employment 400 500 600
Wastewater
Flows (mgy)* 140-173 155-199 171-225
*million gallons per ,year
The flow projections represent the Council's commitment to a level of
service, assuming the Council's underlying demographic forecasts are
maintained. As stated in the MDIF, the Council will vary local flow
projections based on verified growth as well as the lack of growth.
o
As stated in the revised policy plan, flow projections do not represent an
allocation of interceptor capacity except in the event a temporary system
constraint occurs. '
II-l
1988 Systems Information Statement
Andover
o
At a minimum, the Council and Commission will reevaluate flow projections
every five years in conjunction with the Council's review of the municipal
forecasts. However, the Council and Commission will also monitor individual
local governments' flows annually for significant changes.
The Council and the Commission will use these population and wastewater flow
forecasts to plan all future interceptors and treatment plants needed to
serve your municipality. Andover, through its comprehensive planning process,
must decide the location and staging of development, and, then plan and design
its local wastewater collection system to serve t~is development. If you
plan a total wastewater flow from your municipality in ex~ess of the
Council's forecasts, your assumptions will be analyzed by the Council for
their possible adverse effects upon the capacity of the metropolitan system.
When developing your plan, you should not exceed the projected flow for your
community or the capacity of a metropolitan facility without first discussing
the need for this with the Metropolitan Council and,the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission staff. If necessary, detailed information regarding
metropolitan facilities is available from the CommissiOn. "Contact the
Municipal Services Section at 222-8423 for this information.
Map II-A shows the location of metropolitan facilities serving your
municipality.Existing or planned metropolitan facilities:serving your
community are as follows:
MSB 7034
MSB 7035
2. On-site Sewage Disposal Systems Management
The Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act requires the sewer element (sewer
policy plan) of local comprehensive plans to describe the standards and
conditions under which the installation of private sewer systems will be
permitted and to the extent practicable, the area not suitable for public or
private systems.
The revised policy plan states that on-site sewage disposal systems are
appropriate to serve single-family residences at development densities of 4
units per 40 acres or less if local governments adopt a management and
control system consistent with federal and state laws and Council guidelines
(Policy 2).
o
It is the Council's position that all municipalities and counties allowing on-
site systems incorporate MPCA regulations (Minn. Rules Chapter 7080) as part
of a program for managing on-site systems in the sewer element of their local
comprehensive plan, and implement the standards in issuing permits. The
program should include the keeping of permit records, licensing, correction of
existing system problems and training of personnel. Where comprehensive plans
permit densities in excess of 4 units per 40 acres, local governments should
also incorporate an on-going inspection and maintenance element as part of
II-2
.........
,.. :"-'
n_'_. ~._""".,,,~.,,,_,, '_n__
..._..,...... .t,..'.........,......- ..,....,
o
Figura IT-A
METROPOLITAN SEWAGE TREATMENT FACiliTIES
CITY OF ANDOVER
I ~ v-~~.... jn ~ "'->l,.,..:-r:f1'" '~i r i .. - ~
~~: =1,c1,\- A }[f--c~ --:l.; ,~rr.'~'.:"". ,...: I'~ "'-~,:'-:r:~,.
~ '!.-_.-.-~:;j~.-." ~" <b, -~ -.".
. -~:. :.'" .~ ,1..1'." ... ,'! !".il~ -t jfUJ.' ~
(1.1 tJljJ.::. ~-" =Lf - -~.(k'" u '~,- IS. __ t~ ,_ ~P-:,r.
~' ,;iP~' "l"-;'; -er-.: -.: ..-" ',:~k......' ~, t 't'
;r , ~. r:J[':':Ji, L....... ~ . - -- ~ \;
-:;'4 '. " , ,~! ;{- j ": k'~,!_~ *,+ " ~.)= )J: A~,::
_/1;;J 11/ ~. --' 'i J '..; i .' .,.-
t..<,' ill' ' .,y' 1* ,;, ;,;T1i. J:. d'\. ',_ ,".i?'.
~ i'~ -.... f ;.40'=...:: ~.l.l Pi ~.~
!~:- k.. <!l ":''10\', " - , "*\.^ A'.....:.:
: ' ,\, '\." + + ",. ...
T \!' L, ' . ,\-' I ~:'., I -:-,;r I,
I ~ ,::;: <!: A h. _' I ~: · , - ~ ~ . <&(
\-:: l~r;l ~~ i 'ir~1i ~~ 1r ';!i~4"1 I~-"
~/~ .~ J ~'1- .. I 4t:/ -jI' 11If'- ":""l" .,.;...~
~;.; 1 ~f-~': ~ANDO~ER /""~:1r"
~~,_.,:rc~~ 9 /.~~'o> ii",,+ ~ ~ ': S ~ ?
, \ "- ~-j;;;:; ,_I Ii ~ - - r:t.' +. i' : I
~ ;;;'"-e ~.::, -!(. . # ^ - ~ :'Ei; ~v I@
~ ' ~1f'~U;. "'"'f>TI?'~ ~. ~ 8 9 N ' -
1:': : ~v~ , itfN, ',- .' '- --7
~ \;:::"., -703~1:~, -: I ......... j :---- " ~ t
~~. A\l.. (L t!'~:",~~d;u~n~1 ". /,
~~-::~......., ~,~~'-r-" -\,~:I '~-,. :- A'..~A~ i A
...... ~ . 9,: .,., I~ ~::- ,~ ~ q _ ~
z: I ~:'-i- I -- I >J!i< r
~I .;. ilm, : .,~ '. I - '. ~', -:~~}t -:!z:,
, ~ , : I ., -if - ,..:, ~ ~ ~ j r ~ '--j
\ i I :, ' ,. -:-. :: -, './' J; J"-..- ~ ~_~ If ~.
I . ~ !..~-42 .' ~'CJ ,)MSB-7035 ~~ "
. ..., -~ - '\ ~ -- -!J~ -- I -"
: . , ..,~.. ~l kD *\. ,~~ '< .- -~_z.,4+la 1\;~ ;= .~_ - ~
)~S . :1:"'" ~ '-1 ~ l / <8"\ ~ ,l'::'.r- ~
~.,~. A ,~n),~ ~~~l 1/ d ,j\~'Ii" l~'r
,'!J.-3~3. ll,~. ,.;. "~: ;~ _.:~! ~'li;:" , ~ oMl,~/ ~~rr- ~~
. ? C l.. Ll " .':"".!al!. ,t-."- ~ ." ~,.",..~
~:-Id.i. :~.~.,.-"'~: ~?~ . h-~~
~ ~ eO'&:. ~ ,.~ ~ .~~ 4--~~-'52~, lt~ ~ ~~;_
0 . Waste water treatment plant
- Existing Interceptor t 0 2 (3
.. Proposed Interceptor
0 Lift station Miles
II" Force main
-- Community boundar,y Map souroe: Metropolitan Waste Oontrol Oommlsslon
o
1988 Systems Information Statement
Andover
their on-site system management controls (Policy 2 and Content Requirements
for Local Sewer Plans). See Policy Plan Table 8.
It is the Council's position that group on-site sewage disposal systems, such
as communal drainfields are acceptable to abate pollution problems caused by
existing urban concentrations not designated as rural centers (Policy 11).
The content requirements for local sewer plans address local planning for
these systems.
3. Man~gement of Private Wastewater Treatment Flants
Small private treatment plants are located throughout the Metropolitan Area
serving such developments as individual industries, mobile home parks, and
other urban-type uses located in the urban and rural service areas. The
Council is concerned that these facilities encourage urban development in the'
rural service area or become the responsibility of the Councilor Commission
due to permit violations or death or bankruptcy of theowner.ope~ator. The
revised Policy Plan states that private treatment facilities should be
permitted only if they are provided for in Council-approved comprehensive
plans and are in full accord with the local comprehensive plan (Policy 12).
Andover should include in the sewer element (sewer policy'plan) of its local
comprehensive plan the conditions under which private treatment plants would
be allowed, including the location (map), capacity and flows to existing
facilities, ~ declare that under no circumstances will private wastewater
treatment plants be acceptable. If there is a later change in the community's
position or policy, a plan amendment should be submitted for Council approval.
B. Determining Whether a Plan Amendment Is Necessary
;.
It may not be necessary for Andover to prepare an amendment to the sewer
element (sewer policy plan) in its current comprehensive plan. If Andover's
plan or expectations for development meet the following conditions, the
community may choose not to prepare an amendment to the sewer element of its
comprehensive plan. The community should submit instead a statement to the
Council certifying that the community's plan or expectations for future
development meet all of these conditions. If the conditions change, an
amendment should be filed at that time. Some of the conditions listed may not
be applicable to your community.
o
1. the community agrees with the Council's population, household and
employment forecasts for 1990 and 2000,
2. the community is in agreement with the Council's forecasts for sewered
population, housing, employment and wastewater flows for 1990, 2000 and 2010,
,3. no increase is planned in the community's projected wastewater flows for
each metropolitan interceptor from those stated in the community's current
Council-approved sewer element,
4. the community's current comprehensive plan is consistent with
policies for rural area density, and the management and control of
Council
individual
I
II-3
o
1988 Systems Information Statement
Andover
on-site sewage disposal systems as folldws (See Policy Plan, Table 8):
a) all local governments allowing on-site systems incorporate MPCA
regulations (Minn. Rules Chapter 7080), keeping of permit records,
licensing, correction of existing system p~blems and training of
personnel.
b) local governments allowing densities in excess of 4 units per 40
acres also incorporate post-installation inspection and maintenance
element as part df their on-site system management controls.
5. the sewer element of the comprehensive plan is consistent with Council
policies for the man~gement and control of priv~te wastewater treatment
plants, .
6. no change in the MUSA is expected or planned at the current time, and,
7. no new or expanded.municipal treatment plants are planned at the current
time.
8. a communal drainfield has been constructed or expanded since the
community or county last submitted its comprehensive plan or an amendment to
the Council for review."
C. Format And Content Of .Plan Amendments
The revised policy plan clarifies the content and format requirements for both
the sewer element (sewer policy plan) of a local comprehensive plan and the
I
loca! comprehensive sewer plan (see Content Requirements for Local Sewer
Plans). It may be nec~ssary,for a local government to prepare amendments to
one or both of these plans. In formulating proposed amendments local
governments should follow these guidelines. The policy plan establishes a
two-tier system for the preparation and review of local sewer plans and
amendments. Tier I information, which constitutes the sewer element or sewer
policy plan requirements, will be reviewed by the Council and Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission. Tier II information, which constitutes the
comprehensive sewer plan requirements, will be reviewed only by the
Commission. Tier II "should be submitted to the Commission only after the
Council como1etes its review of Tier I and the local ~overnment adoots the
amendment.
D. Advisories
This information does'not require immediate action on the part of local
governments, but it may affect local sewer planning in the future.
_ Preliminary Advisory to all Communities with Metropolitan Service Regarding
III Abatement
o
The revised policy plan states that excessive infiltration of groundwater and
inflow of surface water (III) to local sewer systems has a significant impact
on the capacity and operation of the metropolitan system and that local units
of government should review their respective III problems and prepare
amendments to the sewer element of their local comprehensive plan addressing
II-4
o
o
1988 Systems Information Statement
Andover
this issue (Policy 5). The MWCC will prepare two technical reports, due to
the Council in December 1990, assessing 1) the volumes of III by community and
the metropolitan system impacts, and 2) the establishment of incentives to
encourage-local governments to reduce III. Local governments will be notified
after 1990 if they need to address this issue. The affected local governments
will be required to submit an amendment to the sewer element of their
comprehensive plan addressing the prevention and correction of III within 9
months of receiving their 1992 system statement.
Communities which have already assessed the sources and magnitude of III in I
their local sewer system and have adopted a plan" 'of action or program to
reduce the problem may wish and are encouraged to include this information in
their proposed sewer plan amendment. See Policy Plan (Content Requirements
for Local Sewer Plans) for the information to be provided.
II-5
~ ...'~..'.""...-~
o
1988 Systems Information Statement
Andover
III.
METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK (MDIF)
A. GeoQraphic Pol icy Areas
The MDIF established policies for different geographic areas within the
metropol itan urban and rural service areas. These geographic pol icy areas
are the setting in which the Council and G)cal governments prepare and
carry out their plans.
Part of Andover is located within the Metropol itan Urban Service Area
(MUSA) and part of it is located in a rural service area. The urban and
rural service areas in Andover are separated by a MUSA line. A map of the
MUSA in Andover is found in Section D.
Andover should refer to the policies in the MDIF for the MUSA and for the
Rural Service Area as it prepares plan amendments in response to this
systems statement.
The MUSA is defined as that part of the region in which urban-scale
development and investment should be located. It is that area where the
Council has made a commitment to providing metropol itan system service
capacity, in accordance with the regional system plans and with local
comprehensive plans that are mutually consistent.
B. Forecasts of Population, Household and Employment
The Council has prepared forecasts of year 2000 population, households and
employment for each county, city and township in the region. The forecast
data for Andover is listed on a data sheet that is contained in this part
of the system information statement. It is important that you review the
year 2000 forecasts for Andover, since the local comprehensive plan
forecasts need to be consistent with Council forecasts. You should contact
Council staff in the Comprehensive Planning Division if your community's
plan anticipates a higher level of year 2000 population, households or
employment than current Council forecasts.
The Council uses the year 2000 forecasts as an indication of where growth
is likely to occur, and thus where metropolitan system services will be
needed. The forecasts are also used when the Council reviews a community's
request to change its MUSA boundary and extend metropolitan services to new
areas of development.
The 2000 forecasts are reviewed when local develppment trends are found to
vary substantially from Counci I forecasts, when unanticipated development
is proposed, or as part of amending the local comprehensive plan.
o
The Council revises its local forecasts every five years, using U.S. Census
data as a base. T-he next revision of the forecasts will be made in 1992.
At that time, the'. forecasts wi 11 be extended to the year 2010. and new
estimates of local land supply and land demand relative to the MUSA will be
prepared for each community and county in the region;
III - 1
o
1988 Systems Information Statement
Andover
Data Sheet for Andover
1. Forecasts of Population, Households and Employment
Population Households Employment
1980 q,,>, P,'ll 1980 Z.,4l<A ,1980 3\0
.
1990 13,DCO 1990 ~.&O 1990 LlCO
2000 14,r:r;n 2000 4,"'i:l(') 2000 500
2010fc I~,= 2010fc 5 , 0<...--0 2010* loCO
f'Note: The 2010 forecasts are used for system sizing purposes only.
2. Estimates of MUSA land Demand and land Supply, 1980-2000
(a) land Demand
Streets
Publ ic Alleys
Parks
Residential Commercial Industrial
1980-1990 ~ ---1Q.... ~
1991-2000 -1.1Q... ----1iL. ~
Total 1980-1990 Land Demand: <A5 acres
Total + 1991-2000 Land Demand: 1S.5..'acres
Total 1980-2000 land Demand: 'i.9.Q acres
1980-2000 land Demand
with five-year over aget': 1,13'1 acres
---1Q...
~
~
J.QQ...
~
~
Residential density =
~ dwel ling units/acre
*The Council bel ieves that the urban service area should contain at least a
five-year oversupply of urban land within each community.
(b) land Supp I y
1980-2000:
1,l..o5acres
Current supply:
1:18.- acres
The land supply figure reflects the net developable area inside the local
comprehensive plan/urban service line--excluding water, wetlands, bedrock,
floodplains and any covenanted agricultural preserve lands. The Council's
land supply figure includes platted but undeveloped lots as of 1980.
I I I - 3
o
kpII01/PHENV4@6
01.25.89
o
o
1988 Systems Information Statement
Andover
For purposes of sIzing metropolitan system facilities, the Council has
prepared forecasts of local population, households and employment for the
year 2010. A primary reason fo~ making these forecasts is the long lead
time involved for the planning and investment decisions that are required
to ensure system capacity to serve the anticipated growth.
C. Data Sheet for Andover
The data sheet is included on a separate page.
D. MUSA Map
A map for Andover is included on a separate page.
E. Plan Amendment Process
The Counci 1 has adopted guidel ines for the plan amendment review process.
These guidel inesand process apply to all local plan amendments.
A copy of the guidelines document, Metropolitan Council Guidelines for
Reviewinq Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments, is attached as an appendix
to this systems statement.
Council staff in the Division of Comprehensive Planning and Local
Assistance are available to assist you, if you have any questions about the
process. Communities are encouraged to discuss plan amendments with us
before they are formally submitted for Council review and comment.
I I I - 2
.. ,,,'\.
o
[J'~ ,rtf.~ - ;,; ~ ;. ."
· I rD''':' ,'" -: '': lot
J ,,,; .J ";"-'11,4'
,:u",i;,:;,A- ,-~r:- ~ l~' 51'!.!.'~
~ f. ~ ~ ~:~ ~ "
"
" ,
~
~ 0\)"-( Sr
~
"
..
"'.'11'.
lUUP Sf.
:';I.H.".
Ivt.OOll sr.
@
HOUND
""~ e
f
." ~
IN .
o .... :.c: . :~
~;~ @ ~ F
I\) ~ f
0 ~ . ~
i'
0 <: ~ j
0 tJ
:it 0 ~
~ ~ ~
:l:j ~::,~
~
11'*
-1- V[IlDIN
UM.ANUltl sr....w ~
i
ri
~
.
"
~
I
,.,
~
i
,
!"
i'
HICIIIINtiA.L( ?l
Q> ~ .._~
I
,1
"
~
~
..
.
~
..,
'!l ':;
.-,<
~
..
.
Sf.
,~
@
:'
@r-' ~
-I
~
~~I/
.. W N
':"" en
.
~~
Nj_ N
.~ ~..::
N _ ..
w .. ':
.
Ai""" S N._.
R..R.
~ i:~~
;=~:;;:l'~
1~
S'rCAWORE ST. N."
.'
! '
i.
~',
,,,
"t;, ,"
}h;,;:: '
',~ ;~~. ..
"
, ',':"',,
:'!:~.. "
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
Engineering
1'-S~
BY:
AGENDA..tSEflIONC . tt
NO. '5 a , omml ee,
Commission
ee 19
Discussion/Bunker
& Crooked Lake
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
BY: Todd J. Haas
,
The City Council is requested to discuss the street lights at the
intersection of Bunker Lake Boulevard and the west exit area of
Crooked Lake School.
Currently two lights exist. Attached is past information
regarding the light. Suggestions have been made to eliminate a
light. The City is currently paying for the maintenance and
energy of both lights.
A letter sent by Short-Elliot-Hendrickson Consulting Engineers
indicated that a .5 foot-candle rating is sufficient to light the
intersection.
A recent test performed by the Mayor and City staff indicated that
the light intensity is about 2 foot-candles.
If the City Council wishes the east light could possibly be moved
to a different intersection. It would be recommended to be placed
at Heather Street and Bunker Lake Boulevard. Staff has received a
number of calls to light this intersection.
The west light would remain. The pedestrian crossing is located
directly below this light.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
i'r\
r
~ap'1' 1-:;J,
August 22, 1989
~p"
tv. :.. 11 0 iZ-
o
~5eJ
ENeINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS'
RE: ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
STREET LIGHT ANALYSIS
CR 16 (BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD)
AT CROOKED LAKE SCHOOL
SEH FILE NO. 89061
Mr. Jim Schrantz
City Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
Recently Anoka County mentioned that the City of Andover intends
to remove one of the two inplace street lights at the signalized
intersection of Bunker Lake Boulevard and the Crooked Lake
School. The City is concerned over the expense of maintaining
two street lights at the single intersection. With many
residential intersections illuminated with a single street light,
the need for two lights can be questioned.
o
We at SEH designed the traffic signal for Anoka County, along
wi th signals at many other intersections. We constantly check
back with the County to make certain that the traffic signals are
\operating safely and efficiently and that they meet the
expectations of the County and the Cities in which they are
located. Upon learning of your concerns, we contacted the County
Highway Department and were asked to analyze how well the
intersection would be lit by 1) using only the inplace light on
the northeast corner, 2) by using only the inplace light on the
southwest corner, and 3) retaining both street lights that are
currently in operation. Our concern at the intersection is that
vehicle speeds on Bunker Lake Boulevard area higher than those
normally found on a residential street. There is also a
considerable amount of pedestrian use of the crosswalk at the
traffic signal because of the school and the park. We feel that
uniform lighting within the intersection is very desirable.
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
Sf PAUL.
MINNESOTA
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCONSIN
o
Mr. Jim Schrantz
Page #2
August 22, 1989
We reviewed the design from a technical viewpoint. Using an
isofootcandle diagram for a 150 watt-high pressure sodium vapor
lamp, each scenario was analyzed for the quantity of light
present at points throughout the intersection. This was done by
an electrical engineer who has designed street lighting systems
for the past 25 years. The resulting diagrams are enclosed.
Using only a light on the southwest corner leaves a considerable
amount of the north side of the intersection relatively dark.
Lighting of the crosswalk at the curb line on the north side is
minimal. There, is little light on the school sidewalk.
Using only a light on the northwest corner leaves a very definite
dark pattern in the southwest corner of the intersection. There
is also virtually no light shed into the park entrance,
especially at, the crossing of the sidewalk and the park road.
Using the two lights at the intersection provides a very good
lighting pattern of the actual intersection plus some lighting
spill-over onto both the sidewalks approaching the intersections.
We also reviewed some reference material relative to the
placement of street lights. The U.s. Department of
Transportation, in their street lighting handbook, indicates
intersections away from main suburban or residential areas should
be lighted with the use of two street lights as a minimum. The
combination of the two street lights will provide the driver with
the ability to see the pavement surface and area details in
addition to pedestrians and vehicles approaching the intersection
from both the school and the park.
Using a single light source at an intersection may create a
"brightness barrier" which can be described as trying to see
beyond a bright light source. Two light sources will increase
the lighted area and will reduce the need to see beyond until one
is inside the lighted area looking out.
The Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) indicates that a local
intersection should be maintained on an average level of .4 to .6
foot candles. The diagrams which we utilized have been
highlighted to show a .5 foot candle rating which is what we feel
is necessary within this intersection.
o
..,.~ .;. :
o
o
Mr. Jim Schrantz
Page #3
August 22, 1989
The City must make the final decision as to whether to keep the
two street lights or remove one. The City will probably consider
the cost of maintaining two street lights and its policies and
precedences with respect to other intersections. However, we
hope the information we have presented will indicate that this
intersection will require more light than normal and that the two
street lights should be maintained.
If you have any questions or need any additional information,
please call myself or John Gray in our office.
Sincerely,
~d1W~d
Glen Van Wormer, Manager
Transportation Engineering
Department
GVW/cmb
Attachments
cc: Don Daly, Anoka County Highway Dept.
John Gray, SEH
w----- W @J
-
a: - -
3: >- -'
- --~
: --l ::""- ')
Z w - ~ z ..J
- ....~~
<( 9; - 0 C\
- '''' ........ I
~ Cl.~ 3: qo"'''' I c.~ ,.-
(f).... ~ - r:-
- en.... 0 0
ZO' "'.... - W w ::(j') ~
Z - '~........
<00'" - a:....(')~ a: I a: ..h
<( - '--
........ 0 - I I I :: g--'2
Cl.~. .. 3:
....~.... - (')~....~
(f).... -
........ (') -
.. - Z C.\. ~
I I I .. - Z
.,..~.,.. (00 - <( < )}
-
.,...... - a.
- a.~ 0
....(\1 - (f)
.....,.. - en.,..
- ..
I I - 'to
- (0 ..
.,...... -
- <<:10
-
- ....
- ....
-
........
I I
C\I
.... (\I ~
<.5"'........
.0"''''
(f) ....' 0 0
. C\I .... ....
a:....(l)~
.. I I I
('C')T-...-..-
..
(0
....
....
....
I
....
a:
w~
~c
a:c
c-
(/J zit
:5 <~
o Z2
10 (!)-
lltz -~
.... entt
0<
a. -11
en z...
Cc '0
00: zz 'f-~
0< :J:J .....-
::ffiCl}oo ffis
u, a::E:E )c
(l):;!o~~ ~c
::ll-J:oo :J1t
<(WOcl.o. 0.:;:
....:EZoo zC
(/Jc6<(oo <i:
~>-(!Joo -~
o~~;:== l::.
Z",O I I en -
<(zZ <II) W =
J:~<( 00 0
(f)>O'........ w-
-ow :Eo.;
~ I >->-:J I ~
u.. C\I -J,- to...J.... _
G~~o
~~ ~
!-Ot1.~
.f
--r
Jt
<(~
0.......
fJ)",
.. 0
CD....
.... '"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1) ~ --
~
@
~
r-
~, -
........ c:
.(.,,; --- - -,~
~ 2...-
c..:=
c:' r
-- .....
~
N
C\I
~C\I"<t
"10 ~~
~ololo
en..... 00
. C\I..... .....
O:~(,)C\I
I
~
t;
:1<
"'W
-l
'"
~
:;, .-;.'
0_
-
.f
)S --r C\I
CI)
en
:5
erO --....
~Z cp~
0< ~(\
.........
a. en OC
00 W J:
00: ~2
0< ::>_
~::> 0<::
lo C)~ ~~
(')~O~tL
. ::l tii t5 0 ~
co
,... ~~Zo..
.....
""- en -< 0 C
I ;;:~o8~
.....
~a~~s
<zZ ck~
:t:~< 0
en 0..........
W .. W
a; - c~
-
. L1..C\I
3: .
- @ :r-{)
-
0 z -
-
<(\I -
. . -0 ~ I
.
a....... -
en 10 .
-
. !-O~
.. 0 .
.
co..... .
::::(\1 -
-
o
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Jim Elling, Mayor
Jim Schrantz, city Engineer
Todd Haas, Assistant City' Engineer ~~
May 5, 1989
Street Light at the Crooked Lake Boat Landing
and Bunker Lake Boulevard.
I have discussed this street light with Don Daly of the Anoka
County Highway Department. Mr. Daly has indicated to me that
the street light on the existing wood pole is in the wrong ,
location. The correct location of the street light is to
be placed on the signal pole, which would set the overhead
light 10 feet farther west.
I have indicated to Mr. Daly your concerns. Mr. Daly has
indicated to me that the consultant (Short-Elliot-Hendrickson)
designed the signal. The County basically has followed the
recommendation of the consultant. Prior to removing the
existing light, the consultant would re-evaluate the location
and the lighting that affects the intersection.
Per the Joint Powers Agreement, the City pays for electricity
of the lights and signals.
Mr. Daly has indicated that he will get back to me the week
of 5/8/89. I will let you know about the light as soon as
I am able to obtain more information from the County.
o
o
I'/(]"Y()f e'/~~~ eopy
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
May 26, 1989
Carol Kirschner
Anoka Electric Cooperative
2022 North Ferry Street
Anoka, MN 55303
Re: Street Light *285
Dear Carol:
,-.
'\
Anoka Electric Cooperative is hereby requested to remove
street light *285 from this location per City Council
request. The location of the light is at the southwest
corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard and the Crooked Lake Boat
Landing entrance.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at
755-5100.
Sincerely,
o
JES:kmt
Regula~ City Council Meeting
May Z. 1989 - Minutes
Page 15
o
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayo~ Elling ~ecommended if no one voluntee~s to se~ve on the Cable
Commission by this F~iday. the position should be adve~tised again.
Mayo~ Elling ~ecommended the day of May 25,7 o'clock. fo~ a Town
Meeting at the Andove~ School. The-Council ag~eed.
The Mayo~ asked that the union cont~act be discussed as soon as
possible. Afte~ discussion. the Council ag~eed to discuss it at the
special meeting on May 18. They also asked that Cy Smyth. the City's
negotiato~. be p~esent. Mayo~ Elling also noted M~. Koolich may
want to make ~ecommendations ~ega~ding some changes and p~oposals at
City Hall. hoping a wo~k schedule can be set fo~ that. No .action was
taken at'this time. "
Mayo~ Elling asked that the C~osstown sto~m sewe~ issue be placed on
the next agenda so it can be ~esolved. Council also asked that the
Disaste~ Plan be placed on the next agenda.
Mayo~ Elling asked Staff to have the ext~a st~eet light ~emoved that
was placed on on Bunke~ Lake Bouleva~d at C~ooked Lake School when the
st~eet lights we~e installed. He stated the~e is no need fo~ the
light, and the City should not have to pay fo~ that usage.
OLSON PROPERTY/PONDING
Mayo~ Elling stated Wayne Olson has ,told him he did not ag~ee with the
Minutes ~ega~ding Outlot A on his p~oposed plat on 133~d and Hanson
Bouleva~d. The Minutes state the Council ag~eed to take the a~ea as
an outlot with d~ainage ~ights. to be deeded to the City at the time
of the final plat. M~. Olson is stating that is not what he ag~eed
to. Mayo~ Elling asked the Council if the City is going to buy the
p~ope~ty as a ~egional pond. He felt the City should be paying fo~
~egional ponding a~eas.
,Afte~ discussion. the consensus was this is a natu~al d~ainage a~ea
and the City should just take a d~ainage easement ove~ it at this time
as a pa~t of the platting p~ocess.
Discussion was then on the p~oposed MSA ~oad. 133~d. th~ough the plat.
M~. Sch~antz stated the develope~s a~ound 133~d east of this a~ea --
Good Value Homes and Stanton -- ag~eed to pay fo~ the ~oad even though
it is MSA because they needed it as pa~t of thei~ plats and petitioned
fo~ it. He asked whethe~ 133~d will be assessed th~ough this plat f~om
Jay St~eet to Hanson Bouleva~d. even though the City's policy is not
to assess on MSA ~oads.
o
Counc i 1 gene~a 1 1 y ag~eed to fo 11 ow the ex i st i ng po 1 icy and not assess
fo~ 133~d f~om Jay St~eet to Hanson Bouleva~d if the ~ight of way is
dedicated.
~:1 h..J t.::.it
CK
o
. !::::'
.dj
. ::::,..J
o
'0
,if
o
, " ,
CONTROLLER AND CABINET, , ' .
SE~0' . '.' ' '-. . :". :." ::'
'.[
." . . I
. "
. '
" . .
. .
INPLACE STREET LIGHT' AND, POLE
, (BY OTHERS)~j~;:"" :':'~"'. '
. LEAVE JNPLACE';.~h': ..:
ANOQVFI? >~/I.=eT i..tc;trT :#.c'!
4~
2-7/16" SPAN WIRES
'-4-12/c~12
3-3/c#12
SERVICE EQUIPMENT .
SEE~
2-7/16" SPAN WIRES
1-12/c+12
3. R.S.C.
- ;1-121 c ""12
. '2-3/c~12
. 2-=2/c~14
2-7116" SPAN WIRES ONLY
.. SPAN WIRES-
+12
'12.
2-7/16" SPAN WIRES
1-12/c#12
,
.. ..
, 3 R.S.C.
. 1-2/c#14
N WIRES ONLY
WOOD POLE-CLASS 2
~ ADS AND
O~O (6-3)
OUNTEO (4-2)
.S. AND MAST ARM
TTONS. SIGNS AND RISF.F=?~
@ FUR~
2-D
'/'1,H: 3.2:r~ E:
,75":7 TYP:
Lj.~ 3. I TYP!:
,. MET
'. ,_11_
. f, ' ",~ ..
. ~ . ...........
, '
,- -
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
AGENDAS~~~V~NCommittee,
NO. ..
Comm1ss1on
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion/
Hawk Ridge Area
Engineering
~
B'l'odd J. Haas
ITEM
NO.
The City Council is requested to review two areas of interest
regarding speed limits:
1. Hawk Ridge, Countryview Estates and Verdin Acres areas.
Attached is a letter from MNDOT regarding traffic control in
the Hawk Ridge area.
2. Speed/traffic study for Barnes Rolling Oaks 2nd Addition as
requested by the residents of the area. Attached is the
peti tion.
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
'8'
~OF~~
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
Metro District
Golden Valley Office
5801 Duluth Street
Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55422
Ph. (612) 591. 4605
october 10, 1989
Todd J. Haas, Ass't. Engineer
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N. w.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Speed Zoning - City of Andover
Hawk Ridge, countryview Estates & Verdin Acres Areas
Dear Mr. Haas:
'!he speed zoning study for streets in the above referenced areas which
was requested by the Andover City Council on August 17 has been
completed. Based on the study results, we are willing to recommend
authorization of the following speed lillli.ts:
176th Ave. N.W. - '35 ll'ph between verdin st. and Arrowhead st.
Arrowhead st. . - 35 mph between 176th Ave. and 177th lane
30 mph between 179th Ave. and 18lst Ave.
177th lane - 35 mph between the west en:i of the street and
verdin st.
179th Ave. - 35 mph between the west en:i of the street and
verdin st.
zion street - 30 mph between 177th Iane and 179th Ave.
Gladiola st. - 30 mph between 179th and 177th Ave.
177th Ave. - 30 mph between Gladiola st. and Eidelweiss st.
No posted lillli.t between Arrowhead st. and west
en:i of road.
Eidelweiss st. - 30 mph between 177th Ave. and 18lst Ave.
Crocus st. - 30 mph between 179th Ave. and '18lst Ave.
176th Circle - No posted lillli.t between west errl of read and
Arrowhead st.
o
An Equal Opportunity Employer
-~
V ?
~M1NNESOTA ~
1990
o
ToddJ.Haas
October 10, 1989
Page Two '
Autfiorization of the above speed lilllits would be contingent on
installation of "srop" signs for all streets intersecting with 177th lane
and 179th Avenue, and also for 176th Circle and 177th Avenue where they
intersect Arl::'oWhead street. warning signs with advisory speed plates
would also be required for all locations where the speed lilllit could not
be comfortably maintained as would advance signing for dead-erx1 roads.
From our observations during the study I it is questionable whether the
amount of signing needed for posted speed lilllits is worthwhile fram a
benefit/cost viewpoint. ('!he roads, are very low volume residential
streets where almost all traffic should be familiar with the streets;
there is no record of an accident problem and enforcement presence will
probably be infrequent.) We believe the highest priority signs for the
area should be the "sroP" signs, especially on 179th Avenue.
Please consider again the general conunents included in my letter to you
last r:ecember 20 and let us know whether Andover wishes us to proceed
with speed lilllit authorizations.
Sincerely,
/
/
, /
. "">-7' ;/ /1 7- ,
.~/..__._'_'.'~_R____/ ..:...-~ ^- 0"\ rJ ..-'""
J. S. Katz, P.Eo---
District Traffic Engineer
JSK:pl:EB
o
,__R'"
/
..
f
,I
.0
/ni,.
\'--~~
OF~~
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
Golden Valley. Minnesota 55422
December 20. 1988
(612)593. 8544
Todd J. Haas. Ass't. City Engineer
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Speed Zoning - Fox Meadows Area
City of Andover
Dear Mr. Haas:
A speed zoning study has been completed for the three streets within the
Fox Meadows area identified in your letter of November 18. Based on study
results and as discussed with you previously, we have recommended autho-
rization of the following speed limits:
Dakota Street N.E.
35 mph - between l57th Ave. N.W. (CSAH 20) and Valley Dr. (C.R.58)
S. Enchanted Drive N.W.
30 mph - between Dakota Street and a point 400' west of Aztec St.
l60th LaneN.W.
30 mph - between Dakota Street and N. Enchanted Lane
These recommendations will be reviewed by the state traffic engineer who
'will then issue a formal speed limit authorization to Andover.
. .Before posting speed limits. a review should be made of each road to ensure
that warning signs with advisory speed plates are inplace for all locations
where the speed limit cannot be comfortably maintained and also that signing
is in conformance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. You
might also want to consider installation of stop SigI1S at Dakota Street on
both S. Enchanted Lane and l60th Lane.
You will note that this speed study has resulted in more than one speed
limit value within an area. Since Dakota Street is more of a through street
than the other two streets. the two speed limits might present no problem.
However, we do suggest you continue to use discretion when selecting streets
to be speed zoned. It is important to remember that:
_ Speed limits have little effect on prevailing speeds.
o
_ Speed limit signs are a traffic control device best suited to
through streets where they will contribute to smooth traffic
An Equal Opportunity Employer
o
.r
o
,....t' /'!'
//
.l'
:1
"
Todd J. Haas
December 20, 1988
Page. Two
_ flow. serve as a basis of enforcement and inform both motorist
and adjacent resident of the prevailing speed of traffic. Speed
limits have little value on streets where almost all traffic
consists of local residents who drive the road daily and where
enforcement activity is likely to be infrequent.
_ If each street were to be speed zoned on its own merit, the
resulting array of speed limits would be confusing and difficult
to enforce.
_ It is very costly to install speed limit signs along with warning
and advisory signing for every street within a municipality. There-
fore, most police agencies rely on Minnesota's statutory 30 mph
urban district speed limit when issuing citations within areas meet-
ing the urban district development criteria.
If you have questions concerning our recommendations. please contact Ed
Brown (593-8549) at this office.
Sincerely,
"O~ ~ .1
J. S. Kat;:~'
District Traffic Engineer
'/
JSK:pl:EB
o
OAK GROVE TOWNSHIP
1 ~S0 CO? 3926
0:
;7
..J' A....E.
182~
,;
i
"
c
~
..
...."
~.w.
,"
"
'81S1"
,"
A~E ~. ''11.
z
V'
,;
:;;
<'
~
a",,...
,<-'"
",""
~
:7Stn
~
LAN;; ~.w. '"
'"
'"
<0
! 18~~ 4V~.
~.W.
'i!
'"
-~.". ~ s!
'"
or.
>-
<
=>
c
176tn
o
:;:.
u \7STri l.A.N.W.
3
~
::;
~
'"
or.
:.~
~..:
~'"
i17+!"\ AVE. N.W.
Vt4.~D
L<. 0
176-t., 1...~.
Ioi.W.
"
z
AV.N.W.
.75~n LA.N.W.
'"
~
%
l73ca
>-
<-
Co
:r
T32N ~24'N
3i?
IOill
'"
~
~
'"
AVE. N.W.
x
I 12nCl
.e,V;:. ~.W.
~ !!2t'1Q AV~.
....
"
B
'"
>-
"
<
I;
~
"
'"
170t~
16S1'~ ::
.
'R....
~
~. w.g ! 69~r:;;
5 LA.
~
-
'"
168"'n LA. ....W.
o
>
~
a:
:6;11'\
LA.
N.W.
a _
% Z
,;
z
l67,.~
AVE. 1</. W.
-
'"
164'" LA.I</.W.
:;:;
!64~~ AVE-N.W.
~ '63cd LA. N.W~
w a
'" is
<
-' ~
:6Z::"C] LA.,... W.
,.;
'" ~ i
z - !6js~ ~.w. @
~
,0
... ~
" '" CD
<
n2~ RZ':W
~ ,
171: 6
--'--
?O121
- ,.; /'
'"
z z /
=>
@ 0
0/0 rr.
C ..
0 z
<
c:: ~
..,
> ..... :56+n ,vE.
35 MPH
lJ ho
16il5
1'llN ~2.W
? '"
'" ..
z z
-
'"
rr.
... ~
0
z --
< ~
0: ~ ,;
::> '"
Z
! .;
T '"
!6iS~
AVE.
"t W.
.
~
@
::
30 MPH
, 53cd
,;
z
....
"" 154th LA.H...
ANDOVER
1980 POP. 9387
~
c
~ .JS3rd LN. NW.
;
...
<
CITY of ANDOVER
.
Date:
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
[3o.('Y\~ "!>
f201l1'~ 0","$ '2~ Ad.L1:'Hc~
0....1' e.c..
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved Py
Construction of City ~pe.oQd h'Moo\ lOot ~j~"~
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YES
NO
x
fA/.
1Jl.J
'.{
t--
o
This petition was circulated by:
Address:
CITY of ANDOVER
Date:
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
Ztl.rn~6 Xal/-;'a Oo.-J:.s ,;z~ /JJd';'''n /}-re-....
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City efJe.f!.-d I,rn~f ,.:;jn<?
v '
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
:P/? ~
. Y\.~
This petition was circulated by:
Address:
NO
c:.....---
~
t-/
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
october 17, 1989
DATE
Administration
AGENDA SECTION .
NO. Staff, Comm~ ttee,
Commission
~J.M 13. Purchase of State
Aid Computer
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY: James E. Schrantz
"
The City Council is requested to approve the purchase of a
computer system, PS/2 Model 80 and appurtenances, for the
Engineering Department for use with state Aid.
state Aid is requiring that each city connect to the state
mainframe computer by next year.
state Aid will reimburse the City for 60% of the cost of the
equipment; $8193 times 60%, which is $4915. The City's cost is
$8193 less $4915, or $3278.
The package that state Aid is offering is quite inclusive. See
attached Item List with prices.
State Aid will not pay for the additional cost to have the
equipment on the attached CAD Enhancement package.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT
$ 01 749 SEND
TYPE OF TRANSACTION B B
Entered by
tt Entered by
Vendor name ANDOVER
Address 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Anoka, MN 55303
THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the State of Minnesota, acting by and thru the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (hereinafter "Commissioner") and ANDOVER (hereinafter "Recipient").
WHEREAS the State is authorized to administer the State Aid Administrative Account.
WHEREAS the Recipient has been determined to be eligible to receive said financial assistance.
IN consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements as hereinafter set forth, the parties to this agreement do agree as follows:
I. The Recipient will purchase computer hardware and software as outlined in the attached letter.
II. The following sections of the current agency agreement between ANDOVER and the Commissioner of Transportation
of the State of Minnesota are made a part of this agreement by reference as though fully set forth herein;
Section-l-(h)Nondiscrmination; Section-l-(i)Commissioner to Act; Section-2-(h)Reports and Records; and
Section-7-2)Single Audit Act.
III. The reports and records referenced in II above shall be made available to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnjDOT),
the Legislative Auditor, the State Auditor, or the Federal Administrative Manager for examination of those records and
reports and accounting procedures and practices of the Recipient relative to this agreement.
N. The Commissioner agrees to pay the Recipient an amount not to exceed more than 60% of the total costs.
Recipient agrees to pay all other costs of the project.
V. The Recipient agrees to indemnify and save and hold the State, its agents and employees harmless from any and all claims or
causes of action arising from the performance of this agreement by Recipient or Recipient's agents or employees. This clause
shall not be construed to bar any legal remedies Recipient or its agent may have for the State's failure to fulfill it's
obligation pursuant to this agreement.
VI. Any amendments to this agreement shall be in writing and shall be approved by all parties.
APPROVED:
RECIPIENT:
BY:
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION:
BY:
MAYOR - CITY MANAGER
DATE:
RECIPIENT:
BY:
DATE:
o
CITY CLERK - TREASURER
DATE:
o
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF STATE AID
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155
September 20, 1989
Phone: (612) 296-7679
James E. Schrantz
Andover City Engineer
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Anoka, MN 55303
Subject: Ordering computer Hardware and Software
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
RI~~;!1~9iU
CITY OF ANDOVER
We have established the procedure which you must follow for the
purchase of the city Engineers computer network hardware and software.
Because of budgetary and statute requirements each city must prepare
purchase orders for the equipment and request reimbursement from State
Aid for 60% of the cost of the eligible items. I am asking that you
fill out your city's purchase order forms and send them to the State
Aid Office by November 30, 1989 if you are going to purchase the items
this fiscal year. If they are being purchased next fiscal year, I am
asking for the purchase orders by February-15, 1990. We will submit
them to the vendors after we have confirmed that the item numbers and
dollar amounts are correct. Note that the cities do not pay sales tax
on their orders.
Consultants should also submit their orders to the State Aid Office,
so that we can keep track of the computer equipment that they are
using for city state aid work. Note that the consultants will pay
100% of the Ameridata and Metafile prices and they do pay sales tax on
their orders.
All of the hardware and the majority of the software items can be
submitted on a single purchase order specifying:
Ameridata
10200 51st Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55442
ITEM NUMBER
AMERIDATA UPS
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE CHARGE
IBM-PS2-8071
PS/2 Model 80, 80386 Processor, $4,550 $6
70 MB Hard Disk, 1.44MB Floppy
Drive, Video Graphics Array, 2 MB
Memory, 16 MHZ, Enhanced Keyboard
o
IBM-PS2-F360
IBM 360KB External Floppy Drive
$ 500
$ 398
$4
$2
IBM-DIS-8513
Color Display - Model 8513, 12"
0 IBM-PS2-FDjA IBM Floppy Drive Adapter for $ 53 $1
Model 80
OKI-39-1 OKIDATA Microline 391 Printer $ 700 $6
24 pin, wide carriage
C-180 Parallel Cable for Printer $ 28 $1
S-IBMPCDOS33 IBM Disk operating system, $ 80 NjC
Version 3.30
S-ASI-PSAj2 Public Sector Administrator Menu NjC NjC
HAY-SM-2400 Hayes 2400 Baud External Modem $ 468 $2
C-107 Cable - RS232 for Modem $ 28 $1
MCM-67829 Lotus 123 - Version 3.0 $ 377 NjC
MCM-51785 Word Perfect - Version 5.0 $ 227 NjC.
MCM-94443 Procomm the Works - Version 2.42 $ 26 NjC
A-SMRT+IN On-site installation and 1 year $ 250 NjC
Warranty
Software - Menu Install $ 35 NjC
CUstomer Hotline support NjC NjC
(1-800-873-2827)
SUBTOTAL $7,685 $23
TOTAL COST (Ameridata) $7,708
METAFILE and METAVIEW must be ordered from Metafile Information systems,
Inc. Please include a purchase order addressed to:
Metafile Information systems,
Attention: Bob Coon
8030 Cedar Avenue South
suite 215
Bloomington, MN 55425
Inc.
ITEM DESCRIPTION
PRICE
MetafilejMetaview
Shipping Charges
TOTAL COST (Metafile Corporation)
$ 470
$ 15
$ 485
o
We will submit your purchase orders to the vendors. Delivery will be
made directly to each city. The vendor will set up the equipment and
warranty it for one full year. Once the items have been delivered and
2
o
payment made, submit a copy of your invoices along with the signed
Agreement form and a letter from the city engineer requesting
reimbursement to the state Aid Office. We will then process the
reimbursement for 60% of the cost (60% times $8193 = $4915.80 if the
entire package is purchased). All requests for reimbursement must be
received -by May 30, 1990. If you have any questions about the procedure
feel free to call John Wheeler at 612-296-9874. He will be taking over
Marilyn Remer's duties while she is on maternity leave. Also, you can
call the other members of the automation committee - Alan Gray, Don
Boell, Jack Bittle, Emil Dahlberg, Bill Malin and Paul McClurg. They
are also available if you have any suggestions for implementation of
automation in the cities.
If you are a consultant receiving this letter, please make sure to send
copies of this information to the city or meet with the engineering
section of the ci ty to discuss this automation package. For your
information we have enclosed copies of the previous letters, so that
you can better follow the process.
One other item that should be considered in deciding whether to purchase
the standard computer is that a connection to the state mainframe will
be required next year. Intertech is the state agency that operates and
maintains the state mainframe. Their managers have info~ed us that
they will only offer support for IBM computers if problems arise!
Computers that have been purchased from Ameridata will come with menus,
software and batch files installed. They will be ready to use as soon
as they are turned on.
Training information will be provided at a later time. The state Aid
Office will provide training for specific state Aid Applications in May,
June, and October of next year. The Automation commi ttee will be
working with the st. Paul Technical Institute to develop a training
schedule for early next year for the standard software packages. Also,
cities can check with their local technical institutes and community
education to receive computer training.
Further information and demonstrations of computer Aided Design (CAD)
and state Aid applications will be given at the Public Works Conference
on November 25, 1989 and at the city Engineers Annual Meeting on January
18, 1990.
sincerely,
~w~?\'~J~
~ Gordon M. Fay
Enclosures
cc:
District state Aid Engineers
Marilyn Remer
Clint Sawinski - Ameridata
o
3
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CAD ENHANCEMENTS
o
The CAES Office at Mn/DOT has done testing of CAD workstations to
determine suggestions for equipment to be purchased for your personal
computer system when using CAD. The following information was compiled:
HINIKDK SPECIFICATIONS
70 MB hard disk
- 20 MHz, 80386 processor
- 4 MB of RAM
- 14 inch display with 1024 x 768 resolution
SYSTEM UNITS
One item often needed is a dual async adapter. PS/2s come with one
async port. If more than one.. of the following async devices will be
used, a dual async adapter is needed:
- Menu tablet
- Pen plotter
- Modem
- Async connection to workstation or VAX
ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION
IBM-ASYNC IBM Dual Async Adapter/A for PS2 80
PRICE
$ 159
UPS CHARGE
$ 2
The following options will need a slot:
- Graphics card
- Network card
- Dual async adapter
- 5.25 inch floppy drive adapter
- Tape backup device
- Some memory options
Upgraded system units are listed below. You will receive reimbursement
equal to 60% of the Model 8071 when ordering these upgraded systems.
ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE
UPS CHARGE
IBM-PS2-8111 PS/2 Model 80, 80386 Processor, $5,793
20 MHZ, 115 MB Hard DiSk, 1.44
MB Floppy Drive, 2 MB Memory,
VGA, Enhanced Keyboard
IBM-PS2-8311 PS/2 Model 80, 80386 Processor, $7,917
20 MHZ, 314 MB Hard Disk, 1.44
MB Floppy Drive, 2 MB Memory,
VGA, Enhanced Keyboard
$ 6
$ 6
o
1
o
o
MATH COPROCESSOR
Microstation and other CAD software require a math coprocessor.
ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE UPS CHARGE
INT-80387.-16 Math Coprocessor for IBM Model 8071 $ 473 $ 1
INT-80387-20 Math Coprocessor for IBM Model 8111 $ 535. $ 1
and 8311
ADDITIONAL RANDOH ACCESS HEHORY (RAIl)
CAD requires a minimum of 2 MB additional RAM. The items for ordering
the additional RAM are listed below.
ITEM NUMBER
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE UPS CHARGE
IBM 80386 2 MB System Board Memory $1,021 $ 2
Expansion for 8111 and 8311
3862MB Expansion for Model 8071 $1,275 $ 2
IBM-MSBE-386
IBM-MEOP-328
NOTE: Order what is economically feasible for your city at this time.
You may find that you want to phase in CAD software and hardware over
a period of time. For example, you may want to start with an 8513
monitor and purchase a 19" monitor with better resolution in a year.
The software company supplying the CAD software should be consulted when
deciding on equipment.
Additional information will be mailed separately by Ameridata which will
cover monitors and graphics controllers. If there are additional
questions, Clint sawinski from Ameridata can be contacted at 612-557-
2537.
2
o
o
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UPGRADED PRINTERS AND MONITORS
Upgraded laser printers and monitors will be reimbursed at 60% of the
cost of the printer and monitor included in the standard package.
The options for upgraded printers are as listed below:
ITEM NUMBER
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE UPS CHARGE
HP-LA2
HP Laserjet Series II, 512K, $1,795 $ 6
~Par~llel and Serial Interfaces
8 Pages per Minute
HP Laserjet Series lID, Dual Paper $2,864 $ 8
Tray, Duplex Printing, 8 Pages per
Minute, Parallel/Serial
HP- LA2D
The option for an upgraded monitor is listed below:
ITEM NUMBER
ITEM DESCRIPTION
PRICE UPS CHARGE
$1,085 $ 4
IBM-DIS-8514
Color Display - Model 8514, 16"
(Includes Swivel stand)
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17,
ITEM
NO.
Public Works
~
AGENDA SECJ"LON .
NO. Sta]:!, Comml ttee,
Commission
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY: Francis O. stone
Approval of purchase of computer from Enterprise Budget.
I have $7,500 in the Enterprise Budget for a computer for the
Water Department Meter Reading.
Please approve one of these computers for purchase.
All three of these computers can be serviced by Corporate Computer
Systems, Inc. located in Coon Rapids.
A. COMPUTER
1. IBM PS/2 Model 70/E6l
80386 Processor, 16MHZ
1 Megabyte RAM
1 - 1.44 3.5 Diskette Drive
60 Megabyte Fixed Disk Drive with Integrated Controller
Video Graphics Display
1 Serial Port and 1 Parallel Port
Dos 3.3
Analog Display Monitor (Enhanced Quality Text and Graphics)
Price $4,674.00
continued
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Page Two
Item #14
4:> 10/17/89
2. Compao 386S Model 40
8038 ST Processor, 16 MHZ
1 Megabyte RAM
1 - 1.2 MB Diskette Drive
40 Megabyte Fixed Disk Drive
Video Graphics Controller
Compag Enhanced Keyboard
Dos 3.3
VGA Color Monitor
Price $4,069.00
3. IMTECH 20/386
80386 Processor, 20 MHZ
1 Megabyte RAM
40 Megabyte Fixed Disk Drive
1 - 1.2 Diskette Drive
101 Enhanced Keyboard
Multiscan Color Monitor
Price $3,473.00
rhese computers are to spec for use with software and new meter
reading equipment which, in time, can be interfaced with the City
Hall system. If this computer can be purchased this year, I will
place meter reading equipment in the 1990 Capital Budget. These
items are what will be needed:
1 Solid State Interrogator with
Route Information
1 Touch Gun
1 Downloading Rack Master
1 Meter Management System
License (RMMS)
TOTAL
$4,622.50
$ 245.75
$ 552.87
$2,795.00
$8,216.12
continued
o
Page Three
Item *14
c:> 10/17/89
B. WATER, SEWER, PHONE, GAS AND ELECTRIC LOCATOR
This locator is budgeted in the Sanitary Sewer Enterprise Budget.
Water Products
1. LS-800 Radio Freq. Locator
$1,795.00
Davies Water Equipment
1. 810 Line Tracer with case
$1,995.00
With all the locations having to be done we are in need of one of
these locators; and with getting calls from Gopher State One
Calls, we definitely have a need for this item.
These locators not only locate but also give depth.
continued
o
Page Four
Item #14
~ 10/17/89
1989 General Fund Budget
C. COLD STORAGE BUILDING
Cement Floor
$4,000.00
This will not do all of the floor but at least 3/4 of the floor
would be done. Then in January, with the 1990 budget, we can
insulate and install the unit heater to keep units warm for the
hydraulic piece of equipment.
D. HOCKEY RINK/PARKS DEPARTMENT
I still would like $17,000.00 out of the Parks Capital for two ice
rinks and moving of lights.
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
AGENDA.. SECrIO~ ,
NO -sfa~t, -comm~ttee,
. Commission
ORIGINA,TING
Plann~ng
ITEM
NO.
Warming House Conversio
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to discuss the possibility of converting
the warming house on the north end of City Hall to a storage room.
BACKGROUND
At the October 3, 1989 meeting, the City Council asked for
additional information regarding the conversion of the City Hall
warming house to a storage room. I have contacted a local
storage place and have found the following information:
* The annual cost for renting space would range from $264 to $660
plus a small deposit fee.
* Costs for the conversion of the warming house are being
calculated and will be presented at the meeting Tuesday night.
* The preliminary budget included $1,000 for the conversion and
funds to rent a portable warming house for the City Hall ice
rinks.
The apparent advantage to renting space would be to reduce the
costs of converting the warming house and therefore, not requiring
the rental of an additional warming house for City Hall.
The only disadvantage would be the fact that storage space would
be off-site. Items that are needed on a semi-regular basis (ie.
the map case and storage bins for recycled paper) would not be
readily accessible.
COUNCIL ACTION
o
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
MINI STORAGES
ABC MINI-STORAGE
13624 Hanson Blvd
Andover
0757-8485 (Carol)
(Hanson Blvd & Bunker Lake Blvd)
6dO $30.00 month + $10.00 clean-up deposit, walk in door
8.x 1 0 $45.00 month + $10.00 clean-up deposit, walk in door
9x10 $50.00 month + $15.00 clean-up deposit, walk in door
10x15 $55.00 month + $15.00 clean-up deposit, lift up door
SPECIAL - IF YOU PAY FOB:-2 MONTHS NOW YOU GET THE 3RD MONTH
FREE
NORTH METRO STORAGE
14205 NE Hwy 65
Ham Lake
754-1522 (Janette)
(143rd & Hwy 65)
5xlO
10xlO
10x15
10x29
$25.00 month + $10.00 deposit, lift up door
$39.00 month + $10.00 deposit, lift up door
$44.00 month + $20.00 deposit, lift up door
$49.00 month + $20.00 deposit, lift up door
THEY ARE REALLY FULL AT THIS TIME, WERE NOT SURE WHAT WOULD
BE AVAILABLE IF YOU WOULD CHOOSE TO USE THEM
STORAGE WORLD
17100 NE Hwy 65
Ham Lake
434-4645 (Marsha)
(1/2 mile north of Red Ox Cafe)
6x9
6x12
llx23
$25.00 month + $15.00 clean-up deposit, walk in door
$30.00 month + $15.00 clean-up deposit, walk in door
$50.00 month + $20.00 clean-up deposit, lift up door
THEY HAVE SOME 6x9's AND llx23's AVAILABLE NOW, BUT
AVAILABILITY STATIS CHANGES ALL THE TIME
o
PAGE 2
Mini storages
E-Z MINI SELF STORAGE
09154 university Avenue
Coon Rapids
784-8899 (Rose)
(Just north of Northtown)
5x5
5xlO
5x15
10xlO
$25.00 month + $10.00 deposit, lift up door
$32.00 month + $10.00 deposit, lift up door
$40.00 month + $10.00 deposit, lift up door
$50.00 month + $15.00 deposit, lift up door
AVAILABILITY IS PRETTY GOOD ON THE SMALLER UNITS THAT I HAVE
LISTED, ANYTHING LARGER WE WOULD HAVE TO CALL TO SEE WHAT IS
AVAILABLE
B & B MINI-STORAGE
11230 University Avenue
Coon Rapids
755-8613 (Frank)
(Across from Four Season Trailer Court)
5x5 $22.00 month + $10.00 deposit, walk in door
5xlO $32.00 month + $10.00 deposit, walk in door
5x15 $40.00 month + $10.00 deposit, lift up door
SPECIAL - IF YOU USE THE MINI STORAGE FOR MORE THAN FOUR
MONTHS THEN THE FOURTH MONTH WILL BE FREE
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
Administration
APPR1t\\ .E[[SIR
AGEN t/
/
"
BY: /
if
AGENDA s\J1fl~N Commi ttee,
NO. ..
Comm~ss~on
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
1~. Epilepsy Month
Proclamation
BY: James E. Schrantz
The city Council is requested to proclaim the month of November as
Epilepsy Month in the City of Andover.
Mayor Elling received a letter from Doug Hill of Columbia
Heights, MN.
Doug is a volunteer for the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota.
About proclaiming November as Epilepsy Month Doug wrote "By doing
this you would not only help myself or the Epilepsy Foundation of
Minnesota but, also each and every individual throughout your City
who has epilepsy".
o
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER TO BE EPILEPSY
MONTH IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
WHEREAS, there are more than 100,000 Minnesotans with some
form of epilepsy; and
WHEREAS, epilepsy is the second most common neurological
disfunction or physical impairment, not a disease but a disorder
of the nervous system; and
WHEREAS, sixty percent of those persons who have epilepsy are
elementary school children or younger which is approximately one
child in every second classroom; and
WHEREAS, early diagnosis and attention to the social and
neurological aspects of epilepsy will afford people better
control; and
WHEREAS, there continues to be a need for improved education
and more information regarding public attitudes toward
understanding and accepting those persons with epilepsy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, James E. Elling,
Mayor of the City of Andover do hereby proclaim the month of
November as EPILEPSY MONTH IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA and
encourage the residents of our City to increase their awareness
of the needs of those who have epilepsy.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling, Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
October 17, 1989
DATE
AGENDA SEC.JION .
NO. Staff, comm~ttee,
Commission
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
APPROVED FOR
AGE A
BY: Todd J. Haas
BY:
~T5.M 17. Refinish City Hall
Tennis Court
..('fJcY
The City Council is requested to approve the expenditures as
requested by the Park and Recreation Commission for the Andover
City Hall Tennis Courts.
Attached is a proposal from Blacktop Repair Service to extend the
price of September 1989 to redo two tennis courts at City Hall to
the spring of 1990 at no price increase from the original
proposal.
Frank Stone and Marc McMullen will be present at the meeting to
discuss this item with the Council.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,
Jroposal
Page No.
of
o
BLACKTOP REPAIR SERVICE
16340 Nowthen Blvd.
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone 753-1127
PHONE
JOB NAME
JOB lOCA nON
~,
~.s-;;,." 3-
DATE OF PlANS
JOB PHON!
ARCHITECT
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
fr~ 4~ ~
~~
;4
~~
fr;---
~
~-I ~/fJ>7-
J d#~ if Wj .4-Lfl.
~~cL~
f~(:Z-)
-h~ ~
c1
r170
J~~
~.F~'
DI~ 'rOpOSl' hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specifications. for the sum of:
dollars ($
).
Payment to be made as follows:
. ,
.. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be c:arnpleoled in .. workmanlike
manner accordina: to standard practiCes. Any ..Iteration or dev..tlon from above SPt:CI'iu,
lions involving extra costs Ylflll be executed only upon w(ltten orders. and Will become an
extra charge over and abave the eSllm.I.. All agreements contingent upon strikes. aCCidents
or delays beyond our control. Owner to'car~ ,.,.. tnrnac1ft ....t'! nth", n~eswry Insurance.
Authorized
Signature
Note: This proposal may be
withdrawn by uS If not accepted within
days. )
~rtptantt of Jroposal- The above prices.. speclficallons
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized
to do the work as specified. Payment WIll be made as outlined above.
Slgnafure
Date at Acceptance:
Signature
-_.:=.~~,.:.~~",.~_=~J .
Jroposnl
Page No.
of
Pages
BLACKTOP REPAIR SERVICE
16340 Nowthen Blvd.
Anoka, M N 55303
Phone 753-1127
JOB PHONE
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
I_ ~..~ tJ-d Zl4~ r;Jt-.. -
~_ I< ~ C/..U ~ J.{) .u,...,:. tf)~~~ e..-fJ ~ h> .3-:;" tv...L
~ ~ CN:>' 0.- ...... ~€. <=J.A-t-: .~ ~ W'::u.. p.,~e.d j(~
4 ~ lid ~ haJ. MCJA-jJLJ.J ~~..J.,. &v-f'...J. t.~ - E:K~
jo)...~ ~~. f)~, ~/"
j}1f- 4aJ f.I.-k' ~r
'f~ ~, u)l-i ~(J..-~---fJ~ ~ ~e ..t
ft> ~ ~- 6l"~ aJ-1-~-'- fD 0" tJ-I ~
4/.t) ~~.
4if
$- R~~
1- c.'/2......-. ~ ~.
~-~~)~ ~ ~
jd-c,...J.4 a ~ _.-1 . p?~P' ~
,.3. t!~ t,.J. ~ ~ - ~..J-~..4-~' -'/J ~d~~"CYA~' ~ B- -_Iz.~rAf~
,-:oJ C-:t. ~ jJ,J:.,/)( f),. -t.. ~ ;k12er--?' r' t7~ -
8-- ~ p~ ~~
~~
L-c-
//o~/?-O
~ f!-....---v . /2.- .Ig ~~ y...1
~./~ .
Dr 'rupnllr hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
Payment to be made as follows:
dollars ($
..s ? ,b.of cr6
) .
Note: This proposal may be
withdrawn by us If not accepted within
diD
. ,
- All m..t.'~1 is auaranteed to be as specified. AU work to ~ completed in a workmanlike
manner KcordinC to standard practICes. Any alteration or devl.tlon from above speclfica'
tions involving eatr. costs will be executed only upon wrItten orders. and will become an
extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes. accIdents
~r delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fin". tnrnatlt'l 'I"" nth~r nl!c:essary Insurance.
Authoflzed
SIgnature
Attrptanrr of JrOpoBal- The above prices. - speclficallOns
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authoflzed
to do the work as speCified. Payment will be made as outhned above.
$Ignat"ure
Date of Acceptance:
Signature
4
,==~=.,~,,=,~~~.,~.~=oJ
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
R
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
Engineering
".~
ITEM
NO.
18. Accept Streets/
Lund's 5th Addn.
BY: Todd J. Haas
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the improvement of
topsoil, seeding and street construction for Lund's Evergreen
Estates 5th Addition.
The City staff has been to the site to inspect the street
construction of the developer.
This will not release the escrow from the Development Contract.
At the time of this writing, Mr. Lund has not completed the
grading of the lots to meet the requirements of Ordinance 10,
Section 9.06 a(3).
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL GRADING FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION
OF LUND'S EVERGREEN ESTATES 5TH ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY
JAMES LUND IN SECTION 9-32-24.
WHEREAS, the developer has completed grading, seeding, and
street construction of Lund's Evergreen Estates 5th Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the final grading for street
construction of Lund's Evergreen Estates 5th Addition.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk
City Clerk
o
o
MERILA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS, SITE PLANNERS
8401 73rd Avenue North . Brooklyn Park, MN 55428
Telephone: (612) 533-7595
FAX: 533-1937
October 17, 1988
Mr. James Schrantz
City Engineer
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, Minnesota 55303
Re: Lund's Evergreen Estates 5th Addition
Street Construction
Project No. 83-044
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
-- - ,.......- ----
~JrtF-~VEO
j \1~;;;~-'~9881
__f"OI'tl
CITY OF ANOOVER
This letter is written in response to your request for
information on the street construction in Lund's Evergreen
Estates 5th Addition. The street plans were prepared by Merila &
Associates, Inc., and reviewed and approved by the City of
Andover. James Lund Construction, Inc., graded the streets and
Northern Asphalt Constructionr Inc., installed the gravel and
bituminous.
Merila & Associates, Inc., understands the following:
1. GME Consultants, Inc., tested the grading, gravel and
bituminous under contract with the City of Andover.
2. The tests conducted by GME indicate satisfactory densi-
ties were attained and satisfactory materials were used.
3.
A full time city inspector
report dated September
installation.
was provided on-site (per GME
28, 1988~ for bituminous
4. Street construction is acceptable to the City of Andover.
Therefore, street construction meets the requirements of the
plans and Minnesota Department of Transportation specifications.
Sincerely,
MERILA & ASS~CI~S, INC.
~ C}~y~i;i:-
Steven W. .Thatcher, P.E.
Project Manager
SWT:cab
.-.........."...----------.... .'-"-
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
James E. Schrantz
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
19. Award Bid/Hidden
Creek East 2nd/89- 7BY:
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution awarding
the bid to the lowest responsible bidder for Project 89-17, Hidden
Creek East 2nd Addition.
The bids will be received at 10:00 A.M., October 16, 1989 and
tabulated for the Council and handed out at the meeting.
Enclosed: Resolution without bidders and amount.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
o
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 89-17 FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER,
STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF HIDDEN CREEK EAST 2ND.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in
Council Resolution No. 168-89, dated October 3, 1989, bids were
received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with in the
amount of for construction of the
improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
Meeting this
day of
,19 ,with Councilmen
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
James E. Elling
Mayor
~ ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 17, 1989
ITEM
NO.
20. Approve Change
Orderj88-35
BY:
James E. Schrantz
APPRO~ FOR
AGEN~ .LJ
"-
BY:
I
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to approve the Change Order #1 in
the added amount of $2990.
We decided it would be better to have the valve on the tower line,
to isolate the tower, than on the mainline. This will allow us to
use the new well while the tower is down for painting, etc. in the
future.
This valve was removed from Moser's project so there will be a
change order deleting a 16-inch valve on that contract.
There are two watermain contracts. One out of the tower and
out of the tower site toward City Hall. The other project
continues from there to down by the school. The reason for the
split project is so the tower people can schedule the watermain
construction closest to the tower without needing to schedule
another contractor.
MOTION BY
o TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
o
CH ANG E O.B.D.EB
TOL TZ, KING, DUV.AlL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Engl neer s-Arch itects-PI anners
St. Paul,. MI nn. -5.e.Pf~m.ber 21, 19~, Comm. No. _3j,.6.f!___ Change Order No. _ 1
To
PI tt-Des Mol nes, Inc.
for_. _
ConstructlQP of a 1,000,000 G~I Ion Elevated Storage Tank
for _
Cl..:bt-.oi-.Arukl~r, MI nnesota
You are hereby directed to make the fol 1Ot/lng change to your contract dated
~u.g.u.s.:Ll..._____ 19.83, The change and the work affected thereby Is subject to
all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will (Increase)
(..eeerea&&l) (RQt cl:laR~cd the contract sum by Two ThouSpfld
ElghI-tl.undrerd Eighty-Eight and 00/100- - - - - -Dollars ($2,888.00 ).
Revise watermaln as shown on the attached drawing.
$2,888.00
Jllnount of OrIginal Contract
AdditIons approved to date (Nos. _ )
Deductions approved to date (Nos._ 1
Contract amount to date
Jllnount of this Change Order (Add) medl.ld) (Not Ch6fl~ea)
Rev Ised Contract Mlount
$_ 992,250.0~
$ Q....Q.Q-
$ 0.00
$_ 0.00
$ + 2,888.00-___
$ 995,1 38.00
Approved CITY OF AN.oo.Y!;R, MINNESOTA
Owner
TOL~, DUV.AlL, ANDERSON
AND O:J ~~
By
Dav I d L. Moor e, P. E.
White - Owner*
Pink - Contractor*
Blue - TKDA *
YellCftl/ - Field
Gol denrod - Department
Green - TKDA Mal n FII e
By
Date
;:P'GJJI~t,.ct<r
CONTRACTlNG ENGINEER tftsln Date
*Only copies needl ng sl gnatures.
,/'
i
r
l:
~j> .Q
-r-l
if' ..~
JIG
m
-ltp
v(n
Er
m.r
tI'
.J1...
r.-.:n
ij':c.
~:~
tiC.
tliii
1)1):
· ill
:0
, . . . .... ._~... . . . .
")-
C>
\:)
. --...........~.
\.......
~
'"
~
-
...,
,. '-~:' .~. ~. ~. ~.
= :" =
'--.-..: ...J)t';"(-~
"'. ~ f" 0 < ;;:l "'\
.~~~:lIt: '0. ...~ '"
r::~~ 'J>>
.... "-\ ~.
~""""l" '"
..~Cr"i..
)'
.- ...ri~~'~
............:.. .: ,.
~~-5:
Lt 4 f'l,,: L{
...~~-~.;r
cllll({l
{j\ <. JllIT\
. -. ...~..... ..... .
. 7\J'
...~ Iir'
O'
. Wi> U".:....
-
.. r ~
1lI~,
...."m".
11:
-r:
'u"V";
~L':
, .
.0.;
. .
__c.
~-,
, .
z:.
<.
1].>
[j)
-....I
.
lJ'_ :
SHEET NO.
__ Of'
CALCULATED 8'f
-O<TE_.
CHECKGO BY
DlrrE __. .
SCALE
" . ..., .. ...~.. .. .: .
.- ..-;....
. .
. . . .
. . . .
.... ... ..M....~___..._......._. ..R_M
. . . .
.....+
. .
. . . .
., :. +--"i"-+-""r'+-~-+-
.-- 00---,;' _... -. ._.._-~..... ~_. -~..- -"
;:0 :. :.
() : ; . -: , .
. .;
.. ..... ... .., ......'''''..lJ)''
rfj ':. .
f"l\ ~ ...i..._._":_"_._"j...,,.~,,.__.:_ ."---..,,.....
Vol '. :
.: -'..
C~--:- --'''1!"'--:'._.-:'-''~'''':'''-7- "
I .._~ ~ ':=..L~.'='.~~~~~.~~.-"."T.-- ~ ......-...
t. . ,.
" ffiB!--"'TW..."U!_L..
o ~, i ~ ~ri::
. V"~ Ui_;--' "r~'~".'.'.f.:"::I~:p..i-~'-:
... ....-J,/I.. ur ." -"..~. " If ' : ,..IlL
: ~~:
. lTl \.:
i\: f' ',;l:'_J _U ' ; " -:: -,: ....~_ :_. ,m
\I .
. 61>....".
:: ...
i'
~:
. ........-.;{}......:--
q, ":
... ~~
. "Ii ...,...
00'
....3= l
" l' . .
...... --J ""1"" :
. 01 ~"--'OO~-""
~!) ~ ~.
. ........li'-l\.--..ro~.
ur :",
7 ~ VI:
r' -
...1) ,
r