Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.27.06 Discuss Community Survey Results - Open Space Referendum (J) ^ C I T Y 0 F t NDOVE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator SUBJECT: Discuss Community Survey Results - Open Space Referendum DATE: June 27, 2006 INTRODUCTION An Andover Council 2005-2006 goal is to explore open space preservation. This topic was discussed a previous Council workshop (January 31, 2006 agenda item is attached) and question relative to open space were integrated into the recent community survey conducted by Decision Resources Inc.. DISCUSSION The results of the community survey were presented by Bill Morris from Decision Resources Inc. at the June 20,2006 Council meeting. The survey results (attached) indicated that there was strong support for the City to purchase open space for the purpose of preservation. The survey indicated that residents would be supportive of an increase in property taxes to support open space preservation in the amount $20.60 on an annual basis. This would yield approximately $1.5 million on a ten year bond, $2.0 million on a fifteen year bond and $2.5 million on a twenty year bond. These numbers could grow based on community growth. At the June 20th meeting the Council indicated they would like this to be a discussion topic at the next workshop meeting. The following are some potential discussion points: 1. Should the Council pursue placing an open space referendum on the November 2006 general election? 2. Should the Council set up a committee to explore open space referendum? 3. What types of parcels would the Council like to focus on preserving? 4. Should a consultant be hired to assist? BUDGET AVAILABILITY The community survey cost was $13,750. The City did budget $20,000 for community survey related expenses, $6,250 is currently available to assist with incidental expenses if the Council would like to pursue placing an open space referendum on the November 2006 general election. ACTION REOUESTED The Council is requested to discuss the results of the community survey relative to open space, and provide direction to staff on the next steps the Council would like to take. Attachments - --- , The City of Andover is considering a voter referendum to fund J acquisition of open space in the community, to conserve these parcels of land from development. 62. Would you support or oppose the STRONGLY SUPPORT......33% purchase of open spaces for per- SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .49% manent preservation? (WAIT FOR OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 % RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly STRONGLY OPPOSE........3% that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....8% 63. How much would you be willing to NOTHING...............20% see your property taxes increase $1 0 .0 o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 % in order to fund the acquisition $20.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18% of open spaces? Would you be will- $30.00.................7% ing to pay $___ per year? $40.00................ .3% (CHOOSE RANDOM STARTING POINT; $50.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11% MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING ON $60.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% ANSWER) How about $ ___ per year? $70.00................ .1% (REPEAT PROCESS) $80.00................ .0% $90.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1% $100.00............... .9% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....13% l0 r Community Center Usage 2006 City of Andover -- ~.=~~~ .~- - -- 1~ Used durlng COmmunity Past Vear CentW RatIng Decision Resources. LIII. Open Space Referendum 2006 City of Andover --e;;. _" PurchaSe of Open Space far PreservBIIon Acceptable Vearly ~ Tax 1nc1'8_ DecIsiOn Resources, LIII. Sources of Information 2006 City of Andover Unsul1l CIly New8IeII8r .. CIly MaBlngs Grapevine WebsI8 E-MaI Meetings Cable TeIeVIlIlon 'U , L.ocaI NewspaJlel$ , star Tribune 0 10 2D 30 40 50 60 70 80 I_Primary .Pleferred I Decision Resources. Lid G) ------ - -- --~ Decision Resources, Ltd. 3128 Dean Court Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 (612) 920-0337 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2006 City of Andover Methodology: This study contains the results of a telephone survey of 400 randomly selected residents of the City of Andover. Survey responses were iathered by professional interviewers across the community between April 25th and May 4 , 2006. The average interview took 29 minutes. In general, random samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of adult Andover residents within:i: 5.0 percentage points in 95 out of 100 cases. Residential Demographics: Andover was found to be a moderately stable, comparatively young and relatively upscale community. The median longevity of adult residents is 11.8 years. Eighteen percent of the sample report moving to the city during the past five years, while 17% were there for over two decades. Fifty-seven percent of the households contain at least one school-aged child or pre-schooler. Nine percent report the presence of senior citizens, with five percent of the households are composed exclusively of senior citizens. The average age of respondents is 44.5 years old. Fifty-one percent of the sample fall into the 35-54 years old age range; 16% report ages under 35 years old and 24%, over 65 years old. Women and men are equally represented in the sample. Ninety-seven percent own their present residences. The median valued home in Andover is $301,000.00, with 12% valued over $400,000.00. Twenty-one percent report living in the Northern Precincts One and Nine. Twenty-two percent reside in East Central Precincts Two and Eight. Twenty-four percent indicate they live in Far Southwest Precincts Six and Seven. Nineteen percent reside ~ Southern Precincts Three and Ten, while 14% live in South Central Precincts Four and Five. (j) City oj Andover Residential Survey June, 2006 The typical Andover resident has a 26 minute commute to their job location. While 33% report jobs in other Anoka County locations, 18% commute to Hennepin County suburbs, and 13%, to Ramsey County locations. Seventeen percent work in the City of Minneapolis, and seven percent work in the community. Seventy percent of the sample "always" vote in elections, and 24% "nearly always" do so. In particular, when cities and school districts ask voters to approve referendum proposals, 64% say they "always vote," and 24% "often vote." Quality of Life Issues: A solid 96% rate the quality of life in the city as either "excellenf' or "good;" in fact, 39% rate it "excellent," ranking within the top 10% of suburban communities. Only four percent are more critical, rating the quality of life as "only fair." "9Pen space and rural nature." cited by 21 %1 "strong neighborhoods," at 14%, and "location" . 1( within the Metropolitan ~ mentioned by 10% are the most liked features of the city. Nine percent each like "quiet and peacefulness" and "their home," while eight percent point to "nice people" and "good schools." "SmaIl town feel" and "shopping opportunities" are each liked most by Andover residents. The most serious issue facing the City of Andover is "growth," posted by 31 %. "Traffic" and ''high taxes" follow, at 13% and 14%, respectively. Boosters - those who see no serious issues facing the community - are 10% of the sample. A comparatively ~ng 88% rate the sense of community pride in An~over as either "excellent" or "good.." Only ten percent are more negative in their evaluations. Community Characteristics: In reviewing a list of twelve community characteristics, majorities think the number or amount of each one is "enough," with one exception. Over seventy percent, think Andover has enough "move-up" housing, higher cost housing, and service establishments. Between 60% and 69<<>>,10 report the community contains "enough" townhomes, parks and open spaces, retail shopping opportunities, and entertainment establishments. And, between 50% and 59% think the City has "enough" rental units, starter homes for young families, trails and bikeways, and dining establishments. On two characteristics, over 40% think the Citv has ''too little:" parks and open * space and dining establishments...... Between 30% and 39% see ''too few" entertainment Page 2 6) City of Andover Residentilll Survey June, 2006 establishments, starter homes for young families, and trails and bikeways. Tax Climllte and City Services: City service evaluations are consistently positive. Fire protection, storm drainage and flood control, snow plowing, park maintenance, and trail maintenance are all rated highly by at least 85%. Animal control receives an 80% favorable rating. Police protection, with a 78% favorable rating, is 14% below the suburban norm. Street lighting, posting a 74% positive rating and a 25% negative rating, is at the suburban norm. City street repair, with a 74% favorable rating and a 27% unfavorable rating, actually exceeds the suburban favorable service norm by 23%. By an overwhelming 72%-196.10 margin, residents oppose an increase in their city property taxes if it were used to enhance current city services or offer additional city services. Among the small minority of supporters of a property tax increase for this purpose, the typical respondent would accept a $37.50 per year tax increase. Forty-three percent see their property taxes as "high" in comparison with nearby cities. Forty-nine percent view them as "about average," while four percent report they are "low." When considering the value of city services - quality versus cost -76% rate it highly and 23% are more critical. A very solid 83% feel the quality of city services has kept pace with growth in the community. Among the 12% disagreeing, respondents point to the "inability to increase road capacity," "lagging street repair," and "inadequate police and :fire services." There is little support for changing the assessment method for street reconstruction projects. By a 64%-14% margin, residents oppose changing the property owner's assessment to a define percentage of the total project cost rather than just the cost of concrete and gutter. Among the small minority in favor of the change, the typical respondent would be willing to pay 16%. Between 71 % and 85% majorities think the City is "about right" in its enforcement of various city codes. On only two types of codes does the percentage of residents reach 20% thinking. enforcement is "too tough:" loose animal~ and junk cars on residential property. Public Safety Issues: A very high 91 % state they feel "safe" walking in their neighborhood at night; only nine percent disagree. Fifty percent, however, consider traffic speeding in their neighborhood to be a "serious" problem. A majority of residents, tho~ are satisfied with the amount of patrolling by the Anolca County Sheri.fr s Department in their neighborhood. But, 35% think there is not Page 3 (E) City of Andover Residential Survey June, 2006 enough patrolling in their neighborhood. Traffic-related problems - "traffic speeding" and "traffic congestion" - are viewed as the greatest public safety concerns in Andover by 29%. "Drugs" ranked next, at eight percent Six percent cite "property theft," while "burglary" and "vandalism" follow, each at five percent A comparatively large 16%, though, think there are no serious public safety problems in the community. Transportation Issues: An overwhelming 92% are satisfied with their ability to get where they need to go in the city within a reasonable' amount of time; only eight percent are dissatisfied with intra-city travel times. Most Andover residents who work outside the home normally commute to work driving alone. Four percent use a van or car pool, and two percent use public transportation. Among respondents who do not use public transportation, a comparatively large 30% would be willing to use public transportation if it were more convenient..:.. particularly if there were more pick-up sites, more destinations, or more service times. By a virtual tie, 38%-35%, residents are ambivalent about the cons1roction ofa vehicle overpass across the railroad tracks on Bunker Lake Boulevard. Proponents cite "safety," "reducing traffic back-ups," and "long wait for trains." Opponents point to "not busy enough. to justify," "lack of need," and "high cost of cons1roction." Parks and Recreational Issues: - A significant 45% report household members used the Andover Community Center during the past year. Ninety-four percent of the visitors rate the Community Center as either "excellent" or "good;" in fact, 48% see the facility as "excellent" Only six percent rate the Center unfavorably, citing "high costs." By an large 82%-11 % margin, residents would support the purchase of open spaces for permanent preservation. 'Thirty-three percent "strongly support" these purchases. The typical reSident would accept a $20.60 per year property tax increase for this purpose. But, 20% are unwilling to support any property tax increase, while 28% would accept a $40.00 per year ~ mcrease. Page 4 (j) -- City of Andover Residential Survey June, 2006 City Communications: Clearly, the City has developed an extensive and focused communications system. The city newsletter, "Andover Today," is key to 69% in providing information about city government and its activities. "Cable television" is relied upon by 14%. Both the "City website" and the "grapevine" is used by five percent. The City Newsletter, then, is the dominant information channels used by most residents. "Andover Today," indicated by 64%, is the most preferred way for residents to receive information about City government Nineteen percent prefer "City mailings," and nine percent opt for "c8ble television." Residents, then, prefer to receive their information first-hand, from the City of Andover. Ninety-eight percent regularly receive and read "Andover Today." Among readers, 93% rate the format as either "excellent" or "good." And, a remarkable 89<<'-10 also report they read "all of it" or "most of it." "Andover Today" ranks among the top city newsletters in the Metropolitan Area. Sixty-nine percent of the surveyed households slibscribe to cable television. A comparatively large 46% either "frequently" or "occasionally" watch Andover City Council Meetings or Commission Meetings on Channel 16. Ninety percent of the sample have access to the Internet Thirty-eight percent have accessed the City of Andover's website. Website users were generally, 85%, able to find the information they sought Website visitors are split on the type of Internet service they use: 46% have broadband cable, while 34% have a DSL line, and 19% use a dial-up modem. By a 45%-29% margin, residents support Andover offering wireless high-speed Internet access. Among supporters, the typical respondent would be willing to pay $22.50 per month for a service offered by the City. In grading the City's overall performance in communicating key local issues to residents in its publications, newspaper columns, and on cable television, 78% award it "excellent" or "good" evaluations, while 23% prove more critical. This rating was among the highest across the Metropolitan Area Page 5 G) ----- -- City of Andover Residential Survey June, 2006 Conclusions: In general, Andover residents are very satisfied with their community. The. survey found a large number - ten percent - of residents who see no major problem facing the City of Andover. Concerns about growth and taxes are at normal levels for a growing outer-ring suburban community. Traffic, though., is a somewhat serious concern, particularly congestion. Residents rate the quality of life in Andover highly, and express a real sense of community pride. The key issues facing decision-makers in the future remain balancing growth and development with natural ambience and the efficient provision of city services. Even so, in balancing the wishes of residents against their concerns as taxpayers, City government and staff strike an excellent balance when compared with other suburban communities. However, tax hostility lurks in the background, particularly with respect to enhancing or expanding city services. In contrast, residents support a bond referendum for acquiring more open space for permanent * preservation. Generally strong city service ratings are posted across the board, with a large majority thinking services have kept pace with growt:1:i. The only aberration is the rating of police protectio~ which could be attributed to about one-third of the residents feeling police patrolling is insufficient in their area of the community. Public safety concerns primarily focus on traffic speeding. While most residents do not regard travel time between places in the community excessive, results suggest that traffic during standard commuter hours may be an issue. The average commute of 26 minutes is one of the highest in the Metropolitan Area. And, the potential interest in public transportation as an alternative to driving alone is unusually high. Even so, only limited support is evidenced for the construction of a vehicle overpass bridging the Bunker Lake Boulevard railroad tracks. The City of Andover has done an exceptional job in communicating with residents about city government and policies. "Andover Today" is among the most well-read and regarded city newsletters in the Metropolitan Area. City Council and Planning Commission telecasts also register a comparatively high audience. And, the City website is both well-received and highly utilized for obtaining information. Clearly, Andover "works." Residents are very happy with their community. They endorse the direction the City is taking. More important, there is a deep reservoir of goodwill toward City Government and its ability to tackle the issues ahead.. Page 6 @ (j) 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Mayor and Councilmembers CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator FROM: Will Neumeister, Community Development Director Courtney Bednarz, City Plann4 SUBJECT: Discuss Open Space Issue-Planning DATE: January 31, 2006 INTRODUCTION This memorandum is intended to provide information on open space preservation techniques generally, on referendums in Minnesota and to offer potential applications in Andover. DISCUSSION Open Space preservation efforts have evolved over time from simply protecting natural landscapes and farmland to include acquisition and development of parks, trails, buildings and recreation facilities. Comprehensive Approach It is important to evaluate the community as a whole to determine what types of natural amenities remain and their relationship to the City's development policies. In this manner we can begin to see areas of particular urgency and in a broader sense which areas make sense for preservation because they can be linked together or perhaps represent the last chance in an area of the city to preserve some open space. A comprehensive approach is also more likely to garner broad community support and will certainly be a useful tool in guiding park dedication decisions in the future. Multiple Funding Sources As land prices continue to rise it will be important to combine all available resources to make open space preservation feasible. Some of the options include: . Landowner donation . Purchase of conservation easement (as opposed to fee title) . Transfer or purchase of development rights . Park dedication . Federal, state and Non-profit grant programs . Bond referendum @ Opens Space efforts in Mlnnesota The legal size document enclosed in the packet is a list of conservation referendum measmes in Minnesota The far right column indicates the actual ballot language and typically sum.marizes the activities that will be undertaken. According to the Trust for Public Land the success rate in Minnesota is approximately 76% which is a few points higher than the national average. Referendum Measure planning A flowchart is attached to show the detailed steps involved in a referendum effort. One of the things that we have learned is the importance of active volunteer and community groups to begin to build support for such an effort. Polling also plays an important role in determining what the most successful focus of the program will be. Potential applications in Andover There are a variety of ways that approval of open space bonding/funding could be used to enhance the park and open space system in Andover. 1. There are scenic properties throughout Andover. Depending upon the goals of the Counci4 specific sites can be evaluated more closely. If funding were approved as a publicly supported bond referendum, selected properties could be acquired. 2. There are large wetland corridors throughout Andover that limit the development potential of parcels so encumbered. With funding made available by a bond referendum there may be an opportunity to secme pristine natural areas that have limited development potential as well as 1he link them to tbe regional trail system. 3. The 'full buildout' of the park and trail systems could be funded. ACTION REOUESTED The Council is asked to discuss this item and to provide direction to stafL Attachments Embrace Open Space Survey Results Referendum Flow Chart Enclosures in Packet Matrix. of Referendum Efforts in Minnesota The Economic Value of Open Space Respectfully submitted, tULI Ak~ - ~ ~~ Will Neumeister . \0 EMBRACE 0 PEN SPACE 2005 Twin Cities Metro Area Public Opinion Survey The public opinion survey is part of a comprehensive evaluation of the economic value of open space from the public education campaign, Embrace Open Space. It provides insight into how much Twin Citians value open space. K.ev Survev Fmdinn: . Nearly two-thirds of Twin Cities residents would pay between 10 percent and 25 percent more for a home that was within walking distance to an open space. . Among all metro residents, 71 percent said they would pay at least 10 percent more for a home within walking distance of an open space. Among residents who have recently moved, 70 percent said they would pay at least 10 percent more; among those who intend to move soon, 69 percent said they w~uld pay at least 10 percent more. . By a 70 percent - 24 percent margin, residents would support a $30 per year property tax increase to raise funds for purchasing, restoring, and maintaining natural areas in their county. . Residents reporting they.are '<Very satisfied" with nearby open space are more active in their communities. Residents who are "very satisfied" with the amount of nearby amount space also are more likely to have stronger ties to their entire community than others; 50 percent of those very satisfied with the nearoy open space say they feel a real tie to their city or township compared to 40 percent of all respondents who felt close ties. . There is a similarity in the data between older, more affluent residents and younger, middle- income Twin Citians. Fifty-eight percent of residents between 35 and 54 were willing to pay between 10 percent and 25 percent more for a home within walking distance of open space, compared to 53 percent of those 55 and older. . In 2002, Dakota County passed a referendum to raise property taxes for open space acquisition and preservation. Most Dakota County residents still see great value in preserVing .open space; for example, 73 percent agree with the statement, "even if the land acquired for preservation is not in my immediate area, Dakota County should preserve open space as a legacy for the future. " . Most Dakota County residents think the referendum funds allowed preservation to occur in key parts of Dakota County. By a 47 percent-7 percent margin. residents agree that the referendum allowed Dakota County to acquire and preserve open spaces in spite of significant .development throughout the county. Methodology: This study was conducted by Decision Resources Ltd., a Minneapolis research firm. It contains the results of a telephone survey of 500 randomly selected residents of the eleven-county Metropolitan Area. In addition. a "balloon" sample of Dakota County residents was undertaken to bring their number to 400 respondents. Survey responses were gathered between August 15m and September 6111,2005, In general, random samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of adult Greater Metropolitan Area residents within :4.5 % in 95 out of 100 cases; iD the case of Dakota County residents, the results are projectable within :1: 5.0 % in 95 out of 100 cases. www . embraceopenspace. org \\ _"7_ r~'=!U ~i'l i fa:;. :'-~l . " J i..IZ' ' , Fl~:~$ cd . it-!~:-.e: -l1 . ,.; ~ =' t 1. 4tl ... i Ii 1.1> .fi-t .. ~ So t ..d, ~ 8 i [ru t~ -l!l =: )"il 1 ... ri pi n ... II t i ... tit I III i-= r~ IS ::c j f~ l l 9 ..fill i 1 l- e 'l~~ I i-- I;: I !! ~I 1!! ... 'It~ il ~1 ..- ~ ~ I~.. i ca a.i' lis ::c~ 5 ~I "'1 .... i:: ri ! ~ ~ I It I 1 Q) .. 0::: I~! .: I i '1' I 3 ::c Q) =:~ .5 ~ .E > .: .~ ~ ... [!] C\j I~ ..-I ~ it I i t)O 5.& []]i Q) 1'1 Iii ~ cD 1 I i 9'; '--" J: - ::c C) i!!. ~ ~ I- ~ So ~ ;III l! -ll! !' ~ :I' "" ... 1 C) ,.. ~ll j sjiil I ~ .....sl J 1-5~ i' So ... ...... I it I 0 - ca cD "I j:Q Iii II ~ .! ~ It t Ii i Ii II ....c Ilf ] .. o ::s If z~ <( C) . lit ~ ~ ... U c.. -CI) III rn ~ J 1:3 = :J C) .... 1. Q.. c.. .... fil 0::0 ill" ;I o ~ 111 III LI.. 0 ~ N t:; ~ .... ~] III . '. .1 I ... t- CI.) ", II S! .... ... c ... .. oe Ll.Ica = I I lS 5'" ... I ~ c . - I . !! ' . I -; a. . ;:U 0 If i II! i . ii ~ II ... !ill ... ! ... .... ~ ... ... = 5 ,J \;:+ c::-aC") c: H .2 e '- tit 5100 ",,8.~:5' c; ~~ I! 0 !! ..... _. c:.. ClI) =u c .!! ~ ~ '5 e ~ a ;: ~ _ OIl.!! e !.2 ~ " n. 0 Q) c: :I .- "tI :I "i -=. .5 :E ~ '0 QO .. V) .5 .!!!~i c2~i ~g Q~~!. ~g =e ~~ -a "iii Ii ll. " ... ~:: ii 'ij =ii 0 It lii .- 'i ~ 0.. ~ "ii :5 "E-. ~o-8'~ i~ .t:ClOKE 1~ o.;! _ii.D o i " :5'- e Ii III .5 " u u e ~ e e " u c ._ ~ E .S _ .. 5 '0 . ~ rJ ., ~ !.~ .2 -g_ :~a.B -ae Oz.lli ~oa iD ~e -..... ._ ~ . " .. e .. .. .- 0.. as .n 1ft U 9 ~ Q g. -< 2 .S I: - .: == = ~ ; "2 g ~ !"Q 0 .D. ..J ~ e- -a C'" III 'u .- ~ ..g -ocuN oBi'~ 55 ~i?Si!~ =o.s ~&! !to -e'" .JO " ._0.. "'2-" 0 .." u ::l -5 c ~ = 11 . 0 -< 0 .! .~ ~ "i .D 1 .!! 0 ~ ~ 0> .~:!!~~] "c:e c~ g: s:i Uen i '0 ~ cS . u .c" C ..... .E DO · ~ .: CD "'2'3 :'!:: "C i ~ ;: E ! .~ ~ = :z ~ "a .5 .E :E g, .: .~ C.T .: u ~.......9 ~ ._'- et! <o=-a 181ft :.::S! -~ =0 <( ., 0 J:; U _ . I: ~ I: ....Q .- 0 lU ... ~~ ~ !~.=~ 5'; ~i-;;8. g~t;~j ~~ ;.2 "05 -: ~ ~~: :-8. ~ ~.;:: p-:~i E~ ~ Is i~ ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ .~ ~ '0 <:: i ., .g E ~ 5 ~ -: ': a ~ a. ~ J~ # :: .a M c ~ oS c :E i e -s ~ 0 Q -g .~ 0 ! U ., e '0 c: og ~ ~ I: .- i:.. 2 :s I: ~ 1 1: r: a 0 g Il. ~ ~ 0 c" c: c ::> .: -a :a . ..... ..to --:: Q e e g J:: u - 'c .. .= c:: 0 E III" )- "0 i " .S!~.~.... - -:- - "'2 a. .5:2 ~'.,. :. o-a'is ~; <5"0. .~E5:Eiio::iS .~.; . -Iii- u 1ll.JO Z.JO"- c...o !:l'U- 'a. Ou i'a "B-t~ '-oa ...:..!!t! CJo-a=t5~ oS- = .!::! 'c lit u S Ii tj.2 ~ ! : s:: i .- ~.= e S i ~ .:l 6 "l-s "''' < 1;; e c .: .2.l!! 9 '" t: 0 ~ ....; - ..cO 0 CI8 _.:_ =- u _ _'_,.:;" ~._ .....-e.... 'U""1l"0..\! g.8u o :> .: _ 0 'C ..:: III 2i J: " .. 'S - ., " a. co. 2'- .; " = III fA ._ if 0 lit Z 0 ._ .. A .:.:;: II cs - .. III ~ .811= 1,,1 ~e~l lr~Jll!~~~~o5 _...Q III ou.- !u.-'S.--O.,....= i.s;'~~.s ffif..~j .!1!i~it.281!~~~ .E !l Iii :3 5!l ~ ~ i B :5 :a i '!!.s 8, l! ~ 1 g ~~~" ~~ ~-ga. ~~~~~g=gC~_ ..~"lf "..: "."... 11:..."", 1I:..2/S 0_ iI'" " ~" " lL.-e!" ".."" ._00_"" ~S'o=ii oS 01:18. ~:5!l! lig:;:'g=~t1! m2s::-s~'og ~.t:>-'O.. 1U~;iB.,.j;:':l5.~u 'ao...g.;;"'g 00.. Q~ i!! '00.0 '-x 5 d 0 15'0 ~ ~8H~,~ 08 ~;;",,, ~g~ :'",'1; ~i5~9 ._ 11'\ '0 III.. CJ\ 4(.. c; ~ .- II - ut ~ .- = -. .- U,.,\...== tJ.,,;~ >u8. u~- .ucoY.u....uo u "" a.; g oS &A ri ~ ~. lC C U 0 ~ U C t: " .: -2 ~ c:: (/) ";"0 .Dft. :2-0.:: w?:,"'fi~ .-So:; -=1'- u ";':;-0_= Q) =Utl"c:>Il::Vl"9u... ="',,= :==","=" . ~ ca''!'"'' . 0 u '_ LIJ = _ '0 "0 &'I 0\.. - III .D. C J!: .. 0 L- .J:)(C.=o...~a:::80"'= ..c_~J:...c=..co,-.cE :J ~UIlA~_tnu","o.. cc.. U)ut._tI)UQ..tI).J:jOtllall ~ ~ Ii :a:a = Ii 5 Q) Iii.... ........ .... .... .... :2 =1 c Q) -!~ g 8 8 g 8 8 (.) "z" 0, o. <:5 0, 0, Q, c: 5" 8 ~ g 8 8 g CO :I.;:i- t'o-.. 0 ~ ~ ~ c: l5c III III:;;: ... ... III .- " LL lL. C 1: o el < < 0 < < < ._ .!... z :z - z z z - ..... c ro Co C: c Q) .. tl 6'":f~~ 11:5 81"'1 :5 (J) .." .-"e '..~._ .- a ...:= o Ii' ""'Qa"",~",,, 1 J5 CUll c: f'" i!:.:iio...!!!! ~f. ~f. ~.; o "8. 118,.,,-..,,0 ila. ~a. u " ~ 0 ~"a.E ~a ~o ~o < ....... If co E - u.. o ~'i ~ ~ -g ~ ~ ~ (J) In :I.:! 0 0 0 " 0 0 Q) 0 _ II III III III III III III ColL..,. eN"" . '" :;E>" ... o .,. "'0 ~ c: _ i I Z ....:a a.. 8. ; 'Iii.. _ lil~ i:tlO- 1;; Q) '"0:"0 ~E- i'g..c 2 e! ~ cnii. j ~i &&.l.i-g 8 :: - ro ...J 1: ~ u ii ~ E" .- 0 :30= ~ o~ ;!c!t :~ iu O):::Q 2.2 6.~ 8<u~ ~ "ill CoD .il.;; '::;1Ii .!-~"" IS ~Ii" cq~ II 19 ~~l!i! ] tis. 1 --'... IlllS Ill~ ozsli"li ..J ....0 III -.e 0_ =(1) 0 ,...,.... CI\ an "" ro2 g g: 8 ~ g: ~ (QI-.:! N. -. "'. ~ ~ -, '+-Q)~..... :!. '" r-I N ~ O.c ,; u'; ,., .. > i- 0 COli C 0 U)>. z .:: z ::E .:: z Q)oD -.c 0.0 E .... c ~ CD~ C U ~ ro ~ tl E Ii & .: e 1 X4):a. Ii u e 0 ~ ill 0:: ~ Z.5 "€] 5 1- 1- G ..... ~.. "'Cl... in u 0 w ~ "" ~ g ~ ~ s .! rf E ~.5 "'CJ ~ 1/)00 IIli _~ ."0 c~_ "OuO 0 Gl~. .... e= ua !!_C o~_ ..;=.,=::a.::::_ - Q) C\I U C"". 0 U II ClG ell J:; C e '- 0 - 0::00) t:] ~rJ ; ~e~ S-a-t' .8~=cc i"'C) m > Q) e :i II) .... 0 .... Q. c .- c - e -0 c u - C =-g~ a.~ "Of ~ ggee ..ae s:ec.ge ;ca -e .!! C' -= t ;: ~ : .i u ~ -8 ';:( 'i -;; .= :5 ~ ~ .~ o I' M g e ~ t! · ~ ~ i 'S: e .:0 '0 = ~ ~ ell U U 0 ~..r::2i c~= -ec..:o .DCiIIE =2 "C ~~..5 ~ ';~.2 ;c.i- o~-8..'- ~u i ;; c E ~ E "'g 1 Q. Pi 5 ~ ~ e E .3 j "'g .:; e "2 g .g N oS g III .J:J ~ 6 Qft..; 6 g ~ .5 a.. ~ ~ u ~N ~E ~.~ i gi-g '~5'E ~.]>tl!~ ~-= ~ -5 ~ g "5 5 ~ '{i 5 ~ g ~ 5 e ~ E ~ &. g 1 g> -ou ~.g 0 ~g.o .!;!u~ ~CI.s:::t.E '::&11 .~ ~ ~ .s ~ 8. "0 .~ ..g "a :s g t f: .~ S :a ~ ~ .; ~ 'OJ 6 11"16 os ii -;;i:E .J::~ ~:;;:A.."1:I :tie- ~ CD ~ ~ -: -: ': f! eo. ~ "ii ,; ~ .; ~ '5 ~ g g ~ 6- .c~..: ..-= ~2 liD :a~B" 0; :ag-'U"::E E. -O~ diU -_ &.12 c. g ca"UM r::C: ! 0 ~ ~ '~E " rl .5 5" .~ ~ .! . c> t: .; .! -= ~ 'S ~ .2 mOO ~ ~._ -::e ~c.. =.12'::' ColeK 8.::6 B" ~ii ~ ~ ~ ~ g s . ~ M ;a ::. -: 8: = 0 ': ~ : J.. ';; t ~ ~ ;E s~ :!~ ]:-~~ o~&. 's=:~.=-=:!.: il c g U -e :;s 'S: ... ~o · II r: ... ~ .... U :: .... "2 e '-.c:l DI 1.1"0 .- .~ . c-c Cla..uu - 0- &G ~ :i 11 a 14 "0 ; ': i .: 'i .. .!::I ~ c:! .: &G.. l --g :e ~"O "'CI~ Ui .!!!-g!l ~"'CI"2 5"..!!t."i. II -= S"O g.... Sc5 .zE!.!! ..s-=56C:. .~::: j "'O..;! 11= "'Ou "0. -:0'- :I>.._ut~ 00 ~ 1ft og .. -8 ~ ~ -8 6 "0 ~ EO. f! C; :!t ... l ..c_ I: j li= c'C.... cg .~>1s.1ii ~orl .8'iltiilf:!>. i.g _ E l:J Y !o! _ ~.. 0 <> e _ ~ U - 1...... C :J - .- ... .. . ID C t: 0, ~ oS Q.. ,- ~ is: 0 ~ :! 0 .... u Ii.C .8.!! i:- = U "1:0 ::J.!!J.I- 0 o-.,,>u::l ::J._ "u ..e.... ..~e 110-';. '-CO "cco~E rlrr:: oDS ..0._:;..0::1 u~!.~ o"'~ ~8.l5..E Q~~ sS g~u c. .Qo'-~ ~"'>. C ....:E"ao VI v'" .= ~ ';:: u ~ .,g = ::: :: 0 U t1 Ii ~ g a .-" Ii u g -= .~ 3- a.!!.! a~ cOeB ut;li ..GO..Q.~~-g ,Eva .~ f! '= S - .= S 0 ,- oS "0 E ~ r- III 8. · ~ g a- C ::I ~ U == ~ 5 u '" u .... Ii'- . VIa ~ I! III aI .. o i 0 ~ c 0 E 2 ;:; 2 0 u ~ ...J "2 'E: ~ ~ ~ g ~ :s ~ "0 ;::i: ~ g :i "i ! ~ 8: .2 ~ ~ '=0 '0 Q.. ~ o.g _c _ IA _~...o Oc;l ....."0 "C .-- ~. oUe- 00;; 'Quu -.... .a..ucc158 tnO::J ~ ! ~ oS::I g 5 ~ =s .s ~ 0 e". '0 g .. .g 'fj of 'C; 8.. : .S: E .s: g... .s: ~ U 2 ~ :l ~ - g.)! ~ '5 g l! 2 0 >. :5 -= ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~.e .. - ::. ~ .- 5 ::'j! .- : c Ii ;; ~ .to O. 0 v.g u~:o v"i ..sg~!! Uo.~.::~=8E50~~anoe C/) -= ~ = .2:; -S ca :2 c ..= .E i g. 0 -5 5 ~ -a Yo. ~ oS ~ .5. Q) _.. _,. _ :J:JU u--E:JEc- ..... ] u .. ~ "0 -;;; 0 0 .5 i : oS! -; a 0 .- t:] :; H 's :J CI) ..s 6i 1;;; ~ S ~ i g .5 oS oe ~ ~ ~ E ~ 0 ~ ~ B' (/) ;:= VI IIIJ In toft '" CO 3:. .f P A= ;:; Q) CIl - - "-.... ::E .'! 0 Q) .sri 8 g goo .=.. 0 0 0 0 () ego ~ ...; < Q ~ ~ C ~=: "'. :;:: z g "':5 co =.; ~ ~ ~ .n C u":;:....... ... VI u: ~ c 'E' o Ell < < < < < < :p ;~. z z z z z z 03 :;. 2: Q) ~ ~.;~5 ff.,.."igtf,j"ig5 ..r! C/) III ~ or. 0_ l:9 .. .s:::'- . _ ..c._ Q.. v .,. 0 UI UI o 9;'- e - c..._ toft - Q..- UJ - 0 u ~ -; - .;;,I. c E- c:52uS lIl:!2t!1toft3ib')jvra i"O~ i o = ILl ':-- 1; 0 Ii .- c; 0 !. 0- oS e ~ UI .a.. 5 - .a.. () .... 8""~1s. 8"~"-o~~"': e 03 e +-'0 .. .. Cole ~ ~ .... "'0 ~ "'0 (/)I{):': ~ .s .s 5 g 5 Q)o'_u 0 0 0 al al al C 0 ""~ eN <I<- ~ -> _ _ 1ll .... c: .... II:: _ C .. o u.s uc~ <<I toft I Z .g ~ ~ .g E - ii .2 Ii.. Q)u; ~~--g~ o~ 55~ ~1' c-.. f;t O>~ 'So ~::Eg::~ ~.~~ ~& ~ ~ m...Jb i;:e5 1-s -;~~ ~l :2 ~ ::J(J; a!lei g5 5~"'i elIu ..J At C>'- Q .- 0 ~ .... E ,- - "" Q. u "'" IS c :0 .~ "5 '~ - ~ a .~ 11 i j &- ~.; O3~ 1llt(L\l;.......: lll!!z........c .. "2:! ~ -.JU- aUu.C=~ gU"CC6~ == of ~ l5 Ug-=z~.sL\l ugi~alO ~ al~ =: +-'.... .Q.. ~ g =: ;; r; _UJ 0'\ 0'\ Q\ 0 0\ 0\ 032 -. -. -. '" -. g: co f-...... - - - "'- .. t D t ti M N -~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Of- ~ ~ ~ 5 2 ~ C/) ,. .. > - ~ z >- 0 0 0'" U Q).o z Z z J\ II- -.r:. Q.() E m j . ro~~e!! !! !! -E Jl Jj&~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j g, ":1 E E:1 .2 ~ ~J .... ~ ~ ~ ~ .l: JI 0 - u '" _ .: u :a:a 'O"s g_ -S gc.. ... ~ "C';;u -5u ::~ c~ " uiMg: ; c;-", "C5.. 0="C1I "_ "'.. =0 jJ .:.<!!"g 0"_ ;.=, "'. 0'1 o. o. = ,." . e! C! 0 CO C - 8, iiI t ... "s u.. ~!!! e!!.2 II ... g u U' Gl.!'" '" ll5 ...c:.~ u ",,,s-5 .. llI" ~ il iI"s-g"Cc:: :; '0..- 0 CD 0 ~ u ... ~ e:::: fa .-... u _ I: _ .. ~ bn.....o 0 "'.. "'il . 01 .= - '" 0" U co .. - :.= _ 10 _ ~~. ".' -... ~,. =. .E' ~.,_, . ~.' "', ]~.~ ~q .;~ ~"'~:: , ~ -I' 0 ~ II II ..!! u 5 5 ~ 5 ~ ~ 5 'i II l! .!.".2 .~ Ii U "ii ... !! = "C ~ !2 .= - _ jJ .2 J> ~ Ii _ ~ 'lii 10 '" "0 b .. >. 8:; > ~ :, t .;: 10 !l 5 fA OIl l:l .... 'S ~ .;; c; - 10 '>.." u .:.< e 10 .- "E Ii 0 t: .. 11 "C" _ II 0 ..c: . ~ :g 0 a 5S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'g 'j, ~ .; ... Ii ~ S -< g -E c; 0 u u l! ..'-.. _ '_.. :.= '- _ u 1li :l"= _ <lIN "..c:S :lui... ~-u J>O i"s ....Oc;Nu 10 ~~ ~., I...! =~.. .,.. _, '.1~. i o~ .... ~"tii ..,;~ i!... !: ....".. . i ~.., · i ~ · ~~ · .. " . " ~ " ~ I , 'i 8 E ~..! ., E, ~..!. ~ ti;. . h :0: . ~ ~~ "'E . <...J u 6U ..0.... 11_", :l"&, ..0 '-5-0, ._ .. lIll ..c: > >. .. '.. u ... ... .;; ._... .. ._ ...... ._.. .. >- !I! - e ... -" '" - "C .... "" III "Ii iil 'S _ iI oS! !i .Q ~..: il Cl. U 5 '" oW :! :; ~ M iil"s.. I:s _ .~ cr c:.: ~ ~E 1: "0 = u e u !!.. ~ 0 u O!! ... "._ u 0 u eo i .8';;"s 8,.!=..... iil"Cc.. 'oe.8 gg s~..e8 l! ,'" z ... =!U, .'1, ~.j ~. ~...~; ~ Gl tal! :€ co - ~ u S ~ III 2 .!! .!! .!:l "C 'C; ~'Ui " .= Ltl ~ " .=, 1~El ~~~ ...'" " ~"q ~ .. .... ;~"o ~-o ~=' 1. ",q ~ : ::E.g5 J!'o~"i "g~~ i:~.R .:i ~J!':=~" U .. ,",oe -l!I7l&. -le..c: u...._ .8.- J>_;.."o Z :; !!;!f!: 'o"'!!!r i€,: J>'5'5 .;50 io'~-5. :- ...I '> 0. e .;g 8 U "C u .- oS .. IT.!! a u 0 .... ... .So! ~ ~ i ~ ...i ~ Il J! ~ :; ~ "s... ~ = l5 u:: 5 8 .~.~" l- =; 6i~'-. l!:'::5U oli g"s.g g-; .5~iiQ.= >- = ..... t:s Is. 0 u ~ ""C 0 ._ u; ~ u ::E 0 e oJ 0 I- 0:::.= ui;z':ft .~!;Is.=::Ei!~.:; 6~i:1i", ffi .~ u .~ "s....5.. ::E ..c:. tl 6:! 0 ~ 5 " III .. E .g ~ <; ~ ,g :;; ~ .~ 1 i g ] lil j '; c ~ ~ :€l ] i .~ ~ ~ ..c:o_ -5-::ui !'I"'5.~"C-~ 02 gU~Il111 .... -E::~';i..;:"~5 >:.,gu:C 88.. ~o ~~a.~g -< -!;"s,.,sa...."E ~::. a~~ti ,-0 '-s,-;s.u '" 'g ~ 'i ~ U s 'ii ~ '- e .s oS '0 g ~ 0 g ~ "0 ~ ui..; f2 s · ~ ~ .... e .~ U ~] 'o'i .~ ~:; 'u~ ::l 'U is :: ~ ~!:l 0 ulii:;;-~:l..r" '''-''':lu'''", "Cu"sli-a. z ~.5~~ o>'Ii'~c u'c;.g:;; u"B.2 l!1lS."s0.2.g... 1= u"'i!::~~Es,g .sce-!!-=8~ ~~c=..i~-55 0> - .- >". Q. - = c.. -.... .. u .. ..... J! U .r · U S 0 ::E 's = 0 . = .. u!"- ..c: 0 ... ti :; "C .5 0 Ltl - u l: ~ " c..'U:>2 0 ~ '" '- .. ti 0 i:l '" _ 0 '" '" ~"~~"~n-~... _ < Ol , ~~. = ." . . _!! ~ . ~ ~o l .. 08 :l _ _ . > . '" 0 - · ,,0 m :; ~ · 08. Ol '" 0 g ~ F~ "" 1 0 g "'.; ~. "'" =. 0 0 .; g = ~_ Ol i = 1\ ~ "- ~ ~ "'~ o ,i 8 g ~ .. ~" c uCl: 0 0 3"C ... ;4;' '" ...1.!:! ,. '. . < , C U.. co- li: ~ = ~ ~ ~. - N ~o C E' < ~; O. ..1'1:$ ;z': zo" u... ... . .. "" ~= ". "0= ., m C fig ~5...gg,g ~c:: ~ . .. 11 .- ....= ~ .. ... . >- u L- .. Be=!! "'i :fJ. ~c:~ . of: '" ..0 10.. u..c..u..-e 010 Ol · .8, ..-. .. .! ~.~ z.- ~ · H qi O. 0 g~ o l ~ o. ~l U .. "'I "g co.. c mE. . ! '" "0 - ,~" - · H o =; eo r: OIl>. l/).A .. CJ> Ol:g~.. ~ . ~1 Co ~ . '., CN o' G ~ l. .-,; - ;.>0" ': "" ~_ ::;;0 ""~.,= .,~. = __ z g li!!.. u=a it:: J!~ ' ~ .".. ". ~ -. 0)-0; :s ';;5.52.. "fi~l:lE&. 8. .g"s c -= .- .. ... .. ;I '" " '" ~ 0 '" " _ Ol. ~ :; "~"I 'e!. d J~ " m...., '."2, ...=._,"! ._1 :Joll !! -li~~!! ';lse~e "'~ Ii_ Ol"Q · .,.:;;, ; .~!!!, I. c..... .. !>!,.5.l2.!!"C CO ...- fI- m' . ~'U.i .. a... . __ "" __ -'~ . g . % ~. -.2. N. '. .: 0_ 0 . _. ,_ =- = .., . ". .. m2 ~ N ~ " ... CO"". -. . ! o. ;> Ql. .., J> >...._ 11 -.cQ ;; 5 0 ::E~ 0.... ~ ~ z ,; "'>- Z ., Q).o =u - ~ -<:if' a."' .. =. E e = . ~ .0 III 0 J> -g _ !! mQlie 1 0 ~ $ Xm'i- ~ ~ Wa::: ;z ..