HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP June 27, 1989
o
CITY of ANDOVER
Special City Council Meeting - June 27, 1989
7:30 P.M. Call to Order
1. Red Oaks/Kensington Storm Drainage
2. Oak Wilt/Disease Program
3.
4. Adjournment
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 27, 1989
ITEM
NO.
Red Oaks/Kensington
Storm Drainage 1.
BY:
James E. Schrantz
Engineering
The City Council is requested to consider the assessment formula
for determining the benefit to the properties that drain to
Crosstown Boulevard.
Background
(See attached)
April 18, 1989 Item and Minutes
April 4, 1989 Item and Minutes
March 21, 1989 Item and Minutes
This item was scheduled for the April 25th Work Session and
removed from the agenda. The item has continued until the 27th to
get back onto a work session.
Please note the letter that was sent with the hearing notice for
project from Bunker Lake Boulevard to 140th Avenue. The letter
indicates there may be some assessment for curb and/or storm
drainage.
If you use twice the right-of-way MSA formula the cost will be
small for the properties from l40th Avenue to Bunker Lake
Boulevard because just the front yards drain onto Crosstown
Boulevard and the storm sewer.
I don't believe that the City has, as part of its MSA assessment
policy, a policy that exempts abutting from being assessed for
storm drainage..
Staff is meeting with Jerry Windschitl before the meeting to
review his arguments on the assessments proposed.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
April 18, 1989
I AGENDA SECTION .
NO. . .
D~scuss~on Items
ITEM
NO.
:>.
Crosstown Blvd.
storm Sewer, cont.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
:~~r;;~ FOR
r
BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to consider the assessment formula
for determining the benefit to the properties that drain to
Crosstown Boulevard.
The City Council asked TKDA to calculate the benefit based on the
cost to construct a storm sewer that would serve the County road
needs and then to take that cost from the total cost of the storm
drainage system that was constructed to benefit the total drainage
basin.
Attached are the calculations that John Rodeberg has made.
The bottom line is we should assess the storm drain cost to
Kensington Estates and the remainder of the basin at $0.04/sf.
John Davidson and I met with Paul Ruud and John Olson of Anoka
County to discuss further participation in the Crosstown Boulevard
improvement projects. The street portion of the project, their
share of it, has increased from the original estimate to the final
by about $63,000. They believe the County will participate in
that amount because the agreement was written that the County will
pay the final contract amount. As far as the County'S storm drain
participation, the agreement is written according to their policy
"the state aid formula" which amounts to $50,053 (see item 1,
4/4/89 under project 4). We're asking them under this proposal to
pay $26,000 additional for storm sewer - from about $50,000 to
$76,000. In order for the County to participate in the $26,000,
we will have to renegotiate the contract with the County. This
will take County Board action. This is quite a deviation from
their normal policy. The policy is attached on how they share
costs'with the cities on improvement projects.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
. .
o
\..'KDA
T.oL TZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500AMEAICAN NATIONAL BANK 8UILDING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 66101.1893
8121292.4400
FAX 8121292.0083
April 12, '1989
Mr. James Schrantz
City Administrator
1189 Crosstown Boul evard NW
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Re: Crosstown Boul evard Storm Sewer
140th Avenue to Coon Creek
Project 87-3B
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 8179-05
Dear Jim:
. -:::-f.'1~ 'f:, .V E
R~D
CITY OF ANDOV~
Per direction of the City Council, we have estimated the cost to construct
a storm sewer system for the above referenced project based on serving the
County Road right-of-way only. We then calculated the revised assessment
rate based on not assessl ng those propertl es with In 150 feet of South Coon
Creek Drive or Crosstown Boulevard right-of-way, In conjunction with the
Cliy's state-a I d pol Icy.
.
The final cal cui ated expense rate was 22.0% Instead of the 30.0% estimated
previously. Costs are estimated based on actual bid prices.
Cost of constructing 18" RCP fran South Coon Creek Drive to Coon Creek to
serve County right-of-way only:
18" RCP CI ass 3 Storm Sewer
Catch Basi n
18" RC FI ared End Sect I on
Rlprap Class IV
Granul ar FII ter
1,390 IF
8 EA
1 EA
4.4 CY
2.2 CY
$ 25.00
$800.00
$480.00
$ 60.00
$ 40.00
$34,750
$ 6,400
$ 480
$ 265
$ 90
Subtotal $41,985
Catch Basins and leads (fran previous report, actual cost) $28,155
Q
Total Estimated County Outlet Pipe Construction Cost
8% Engineering
Total Estimated County Share ($50,055 Previously)
Total Storm Sewer Project Cost $95,679 x 1.22
South Coon Creek Drive MSA Share $3,085.85 x 1.22
County Share
Total ~ Share ($70,320 previously)
$70,140
$ 5.610
$75,750
$116,730
-$ 3,770
-$ 75,750
$ 37,210
t9
\0
.I"
Mr. J 1m Schrantz
Apr II 12, 1989
Page Two
AS~"!'ments
Total BenefIttIng Area
Crosstat n Boul evard Right-of-way
South Coon Creek DrIve RIght-of-way
,
Crosstat n Boul evard 150' Setback
South Coon Creek Drive 150' Setback
Rem a I nl'ng Assessnent Area
47.7 Acres
- 6.4 Acres
- 1.1 Acres
-16.1 Acres
- 2.4 Acres
21.7 Acres
Assessnent Rate: $37,210.00/21.7 Acres = $1,714.75/Acre" $0.04/SF
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
J ffi:J
..
t9
'0
"
,.
,.......
I
.....
-6-
EXHIDIT A
Cost Sharing Agreement Cor Projects Constructed in
Anoka County Using County State Aid Punds or Local Tax Levy Dollats
ITEMS
COUNTY SHARE
CITY SHARE
50%
100%
o
o
0*
o
Based on State
Aid Letter
Concrete Curb & Gutter
Concrete Sidewalk
Concrete Sidewalk Replacement
Concrete Curb & Gutter for
Median Construction
Concrete Median
Grading, Base & Bituminous
Storm Sewer
50%
o
100%
100%
100%
100%
Based on State
Aid Letter
Traffic Signals
Communities larger than 5,000
1/2 of the cost of
its legs of the
intersection
the cost of its legs
of the intersec-
tion plus 1/2 the
cost of the County
legs of the inter-
sectjon
Traffic Signal
Communities less than 5,000
Engineering Services for
construction
100%
0**
90+%
8% of its actual
construction cost
0***
Right of Way
100%
.
* The County pays .for 100% of a Standard Median Design such as plain concrete. If a
community requests decorative median such as red brick, stamped concrete, or
exposed aggregate concrete the City will pay the additional cost above the cost of
standard median.
* * In communities less than 5,000 people the County pays for 100% of the cost of the
traffic signal effective in March of 1986. The County collects on behalf of the
cities (less than 5,000) "Municipal State Aid Dollars" since they do not themselves
qualify for state aid funds. These foods are used to pay the City Share.
* * * In the event that the City requests purchase of right~f-way in excess of those
right-of-ways required by county construction the cities participate to the extent an
agreement can be reached in these properties. For instance a city may request a
sidewalk be constructed alongside of one of our roadways which would required
additional right of way, in this case the City may pay for that portion of the right of
way.
. .: . '~''',' .,
o Regular Ci ty Council Meeting
."--.. April 18, 1989 - Minutes
Page 11
'-.
o
.~.
RECYCLING COORDINATOR
Mr. Blake introduced Cindy DeRuyter, the Recycling Coordinator, to the
CouncIl, statIng she also Is currently settIng up an Andover clean-up
day. Council agreed to discuss her proposals for recycling at a
Special Meeting on May 18.
Council recessed at 10:41; reconvened at 10:48 p.m.
CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD STORM SEWER. CONTINUED
Mr. Rodeberg stated he and Mr. Schrantz met wIth Paul Ruud of the
County Highway Department regarding the county/s share on the
Crosstown Boulevard improvement project. The county agreed to pay
only 8 percent of the engineering for the design portion. If they did
pay all that is attributable to their portion of the project, the
county/s share would be about $76,000 instead of $50,000; so the
City/s share would decrease about $26,000.
Mr. Rodeberg stated the county has already agreed to pay $63,000 more
than the original agreement because of overruns, and it is very
unlikely they will be willing to pick up any additional costs for
storm sewer.
Jerry Windschitl - stated there is still a portion of the costs that
are actually the county/s portion, as the engineering costs were 22
percent, and the county is paying only 8 percent. If the remaining 14
percent is assessed, then he and the other residents are being asked
to pay what the county should have paid for their portion of the
project. Mr. Rodeberg explained the 8 percent was agreed to before the
project began. Everything has been done according to that agreement,
again doubting the county will cover more than the $63,000 overrun.
Mr. Windschitl - didn/t feel it is reasonable to try to collect that
amount from the residents when it should have been paid by the county.
Also, if the policy is going to change and assessments are made along
an MSA road, how far retroactive will this be done, noting this
project has been completed for two years. There was a substantial
amount of storm sewer work done and assessed in the Kensington Estate
plat.
Mr. Rodeberg stated in other plats, there Is a charge for both lateral
and trunk storm sewer. Kensington Estates was assessed for its
in terna I latera I storm sewer. The' storm sewer in Crosstown Bou I evard
was oversIzed to accommodate the entIre draInage area, IncludIng
Kensington Estates. Based on the concept used In other plats, they
are proposing an area-wide assessment for storm sewer trunk for
Kensington Estates as or'glnally proposed in 1987.
o
'-
"-
:.0
'-
Regula~ City Council Meeting
Ap~il 18, 1989 - Minutes
Page 12
(C~osstown Bouleva~d Sto~m Sewe~, Continued)
The discussion continued with the Enginee~s and M~. Windschitl as to
possible solutions to the issue and the effects of any polley change
on thIs and futu~e MSA p~oJects.
M~. WindschItl - felt it wIll be diffIcult tryIng to assess two.
yea~s afte~ the fact. If the costs are not assessed, he suggested
takIng the funds f~om the annual State AId money o~ bond su~pluses.
Mr. Sch~antz stated the money that is accumulated can be used at the
City's dIsc~etion; however, most of the money has al~eady been
committed to other Items. Mr. Rodeberg noted some cities set up a
sto~m sewe~ utility fund to fund proJects such as this.
CouncIl discussion noted seve~al upcoming expenses that has not been
budgeted fo~. They also asked the Engineers to dete~mine the
difference between the oversized sto~m sewet t~unk pIpe to accommodate
KensIngton Estates versus what it would have been without that plat.
Some suggested Kensington Estates should pay for the size diffe~ence.
CouncIl also asked to know the costs with and without assessing the
abuttIng 150 feet along Crosstown Boulevard.
MOTION by Pe~~y, Seconded by Orttel that we table thIs Item untIl
Tuesday the 25th at which time TKDA wIll have p~epa~ed fo~ us a
b~eakdown of the costs between what the cost fo~ const~uctIon wIthout
the oversIzed pIpe and wIth the ove~sIzed pIpe, and wIth and wIthout
the 150 feet. MotIon ca~~Ied unanimously.
COMMERCIAL PARK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Atto~ney HawkIns ~evIewed the terms of the contract fo~ deed wIthout
Interest, notIng the balance Is due and payable on Novembe~ 1, 1989.
Nothing can be buIlt on the p~operty untIl the balance Is paId. Mr.
Blake also explaIned the City wIll revIew the d~awIngs of the proposal
to be sure It meets all ~equIrements before constructIon begIns.
Mayor Elling asked for a motion to allow the Mayor and Cle~k to sIgn
the purchase agreement wIth AgrIChem, Inc., for Lot 1, Block 3 In the
Andove~ CommercIal Park.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Perry, to so move. MotIon ca~rled
unanImously.
FIRE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE/PUBLIC HEARING
Attorney HawkIns advised a closed meeting can be held to deal only
with the confIdentIal or prIvate data. Mayor EllIng noted the hearIng
Is to act on the FI~e ChIef's ~ecommendation to dIsmIss Tom Schut~op
based on the Items noted In the warnIng ~epo~t.
e
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
April 4, 1989
OR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion Items
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
.
Red Oaks Manor/Crossto n
Storm Drain, cont. BY:
James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to consider the policy on assessing
storm drainage along and near an MSA and/or county road project.
This item was tabled at the March 21st regular meeting to provide
information on the policy of assessing storm drainage along and
near an MSA street or county road.
Background
The drainage basin along Crosstown Boulevard from 140th Avenue to
139th Avenue is quite small and mainly the front part of the lots
drain toward Crosstown Boulevard. The basin from 140th Avenue
north along Crosstown gets quite large and includes parts of
Kensington Estates, Shady Knoll and the Oaks that drain into the
Crosstown Basin. Also; there is the Kensington Estates 4th
Addition along with the landfill and land south of the landfill
that drain to a pond that has proposed overflow that will drain to
the Crosstown storm sewer. .
The City's MSA Policy doesn't address who pays for the storm
drainage that is not eligible for MSA participation.
Note page 5, August 16th Minutes, a consensus statement:
establishing the policy.
MSA participation is calculated using twice the area of the right-
of-way and using that area as a proportional part of the entire
area.
MOTION BY
Q TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
~
Q
Page Two
Red Oaks Manor/Crosstown
storm Drain, cont.
options
1) Using twice the right-of-way area formula, translate into 50
ft. on each side of Crosstown would be paid for by City funds.
2) Another reasonable method would be to allow one lot depth on
each side of Crosstown Boulevard, say 150', to be paid for by the
City as a proportional part of the entire basin.
The Council may wish to use the last method to reduce the
assessment for example in "The Oaks" instead of assessing the lots
away from Crosstown for storm drainage and not the lots adjacent
to Crosstown have them all pay equally.
NOTE: This entire issue needs to have a policy established and
not established without being thought of as we proceed
through projects under the pressure of a particular
project.
On the Crosstown Project the City has also picked up the cost of
50% of the curb and gutter which is not eligible for participation
by the county.
~he City's "Road Fund", renamed from the City MSA Fund, has about
$70,000 in it. This will not handle the curb and storm drainage
costs as the fund we have has accumulated from excess from such
items as where we assessed the right-of-way cost on Hanson
Boulevard and the other small excesses. It doesn't have a way to
be re-established unless the City assesses and collects the cost
from state Aid at the same time.
Andover is one of the very few cities that don't at least assess
the cost of 1/2 of the curb and gutter costs.
Coon Rapids assesses developers for MSA streets through a plat and
properties in an existing area for MSA streets. I believe stanton
had to pay $41 per foot even where there wasn't frontage. They
also assess the cost of 1/2 the curb on county roads. This
enables them to build a lot more state aid streets.
Ham Lak~ assesses about $3000 per lot along state aid streets.
Example: University Avenue - this has given them some problems as
some of the people on University Avenue own property in Andover
and Ham Lake. We just had a call from a Ham Lake resident
wondering if what Ham Lake was doing is legal - yes it is.
Attachments: Excerpt from Feasibility Report
Previous Items
Map
Costs
August 16, page 5
Policy statement - Consensus
.,1; .
.~'I ,
"/' ./
"
;',/
. /
;/ Regula~ City Council Meeting
Minutes - Ma~ch 21. 1989
Page 7
. .
(Red Oaks Mano~/C~osstown Sto~m Drain Outlet. ContInued)
.Councll dIscussion with the engineers was on the advantages of
out letting any pond and what the best cou~se of actIon Is now.
MOTION by KnIght, Seconded by O~ttel. that we table thIs and make a
fo.mal .equest fo. theI. CEPA's) IntentIons In wrItIng In regard to
the whole a.ea associated with this pondIng. DISCUSSION:
Councllmembe~ Knight cla~lfled this Is rega~dlng the easterly po~tlon
which abuts the landfill. Mayo~ Elling noted he has al~eady made a
w~ltten request. Councllmembe~ O~ttel felt If the City Is goIng to
p~ovlde drainage for the landfill. they should have to buy their way
In. Motion ca~~Ied unanImously.
Discussion was then on the weste~ly sto~m sewer area. Mr. Davidson
noted the previous Council took the position of not assessing anything
In the a~ea. f~om 140th south along Crosstown Boulevard. The questIon
now Is whethe~ to assess for the Clty's portion of about $70,000 of
the storm sewer on the no~thern area or to defer that as well.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that the CouncIl, based on
polI~y by precedent, not assess the storm water draInage system
adJacent to County State Aid Highway 18 p~oJect; the basIs being the
precedent established from 140th Avenue south In the constructIon
area. DISCUSSION: Mr. DavIdson revIewed the county polley
regarding Its sha~e of the cost. On the southern portIon, the County
paId $52,000 and the CIty picked up $28,000. South of BunkeL Lake
Boulevard, the county paid a portion, and the Clty's portIon came
fLom fundIng from the TIF district In the IndustrIal park. There Is a
precedent.of no assessments on county or State AId streets. 'However>
thIs Is a unIque sItuatIon.
Councllmember Jacobson felt It would be reasonable that there be no
assessments as long as the CIty Is reImbursed from another entIty. If
not, then there should be an assessment. Mr. Rodeberg stated the
Clty's share of the southern portIon Is hot beIng reImbursed. Mr.
Schrantz stated there Is more than $70,000 In the MSA fund that can be
used In these cases. ThIs Is monies that have been derIved from State
AId projects but are not actual State AId funds, so they can be used
~ by the CIty for thIs' purpose. After further dIscussIon, several
) Councllmembe~s requested a delay to get more background on what took
place.
t Councllmembers Knight and Orttel WITHDREW the Second and the Motion.
.~ ~LON by Jacobson, Seconded by Pe~~y, that we table the questIon of
't e storm water~easement along C~osstown Boulevard until the next
O regularly scheduled meetIng to allow Staff to provIde CouncIl wIth the
background on the Issue: the county polIcy on ~elmbu~sements, the .
Resolution that exempted the a~ea to the south ofC~osstown, and any
other pertInent Information that may be Important to thIs pa~tlcula~
area In dIscussIon. MotIon carrIed unanImously.
o
c....
CROSSTOWN BOULEV AB.ILREAI IGN~ENT
CITY PROJECT a~
ANDOVER. MINNESOTA
Location
. I
The proposed Improvement I ncl udes the realignment and reconstruction of
Cross~own Boulevard NW (CSAH 18) between Bunker Lake Boulevard NW (CR 116)
and 140th Avenue NW, located primarily In the NE 1/4 of Section 33,
Township 32N, Range 24W. This project would complete the construction of
Crosstown Boulevard from the Coon Rapids boundary to Coon Creek.
The project Is described In detail In the Crosstown Boulevard (CSAH 18)
Realignment Environmental Assessment Worksheet, City Project 86-22.
: I
: I
ImprOllements
The proposed Improvements Include storm sewer and street construction In
two phases. Phase I construction would Include al I construction from 139th
Avenue NW to 140th Avenue NW, and Phase II construction woul d I ncl ude the
wetland crossing from 139th Avenue NW to Bunker Lake Boulevard NW (CR 116).
The Improvements are described In detail as fol lows:
1 . Phase
A. Storm Sewer
A storm sewer system to serve the County Road and adjacent
propertl es I s proposed to. be constructed along Crosstown
Boul evard NW from Just south of 140th Avenue NW to a proposed
siltation pond to be located at the southwest corner of proposed
Crosstown Soul evard and 139th Avenue NW. The sll tatl on pond Is
required tomeet ONR requIrements. A weir outlet Is proposed
from ~he siltation pond to the west portion of the ONR protected
wetl and.
The outlet from the ONR pond was not completed previously due to
. limitations Imposed by the ONR prior to permit approval. The
18" outl et control structure I s proposed to be constructed with
this project. Also, the existing 24" RCP outlet from Red Oaks
Manor to the ONR wetland constructed In 1977 south of 139th
Avenue at Uplander Street that has had maintenance problems Is
proposed to be extended approximately 72 feet to the edge of the
ONR'wetland. A small siltation pond Is proposed to be
constructed at Its outl et.
o
A dike and control outlet from the mitigation area north of the
proposed Red Oaks Manor 5th AddItion (Menkveld) Is also proposed
to be constructed In Phase I.
-3-
9128
.. . ~
< .
:!
,.
~
!~:
.t.'
~
~.
~.
;1
,
I
..
{~
I.i,
}I
;~
(;
ij
,it
"
Estimated Prolect Cost
Attached to this report Is a detailed estimate of construction costs for
the Improvements. The costs quoted herein are estimates only based on the
best available Information at the time of the report and are not guaranteed
prices. Final contracts wll I be awarded on a unit price basis. The
contractor will be paid only for work completed. The costs are estimated
based on current construct I on costs.
Estimated Construction Costs:
Phase I: storm Sewer
Street (139th Avenue NW)
Street (Crosstow n Bou I evard)
$ 61 ,51 0.00
$ 50,920.00
$159,100.00
Subtotal - Phase
$Z71,530.00
$27 4.060.00
$545,590 .00
$ 43,650.00
$ 92,750.00
$ 5,450.00
$ 5,450.00
$ 16.320.00
$709,200.00
Phase II: Street (Crosstown Boul evardl
Total Estimated Construction Cost
Conti ngencl es
Engineering
Legal
Fiscal
Administrative
Total Estimated Project Cost
Cost Apportionment
All costs are expected to be paid by Anoka County and the City of Andover.
The cost apportronment for each portion of the project Is calculated along
with the Preliminary Cost Estimates that follow. The final cost
apportionment wll I depend on the final contract cost, and may change If the
County and the City do not agree on the calculations Included herein. The
project cost apportionment Is estimated as fol lows:
Phase
. Anoka
County An dov er Total
$ 52,100.00 $ 27,660.00 $ 79,960.00
$ 0.00 $ 66,130.00 $ 66,130.00
$172,460.00 $ 34.370.00 $206.830.00
$224,560.00 $126,360.00 $352,920.00
$310.780.00 $ 45.500.00 $356.280 .00
$535,340.00 $173,860.00 $709,200.00
Storm Sewer
Street (139th Avenue NWl
Street (Crosstown Boul evard)
Subtotal
phase II
TOTI'l..
-6-
9126
!'REI IMINARY mST ESTIMATE
e
Phase I
Crosstown Boul evard RealIgnment
139th Avenue to 140th Avenue NW
CIty Project 88-1
Andover, MInnesota
CommIssIon No. 9128
Item
No. DescrIptIon
STORM SEWER
* 1 12" RCP ci ass 5 Storm Sewer
2 15" RCP CI ass 5 Storm Sewer
3 18" RCP CI ass 5 Storm Sewer
4 21" RCP CI ass 3 Storm Sewer
5 24" RCP CI ass 3 Storm Sewer
6 24" RCP FI ared End Sect I on w/TG
*7 Catch Bas In
8 Random 'Rlp Rap Type III
9 Geotextlle FabrIc
10 Outlet Structure (to Coon Creek)
11 SIltatIon Pond ConstructIon
12 SIltatIon Pond Structure (WeIr)
13 Extend Ex. Red Oaks Manor Storm Sewer
14 RestoratIon
Ouantlty
190 IF
480 LF
520 IF
190 LF
80 LF
1 EA
10 EA
5.8 CY
9 SY
1 lS
4,500 CY
1 LS
1 lS
1 lS
UnIt
Price
$ 18.00 $
$ 19.00 $
$ 21 .00 $
$ 23.00 $
$ 25.00 $
$ 550.00 $
$ 1,1 00.00 $
$ 50.00 $
$ 10.00 $
$ 3,500.00 $
$ 1.50 $
$ 2,000.00 $
$ 4,500.00 $
$ 3.000.00 $
Total EstImated ConstructIon Cost - Storm Sewer
Amount
3,420.00
9,1 20.00
10,920.00
4,370.00
2,000.00
550.00
11,000.00
290.00
90.00
3,500.00
6,750.00
2,000.00
4,500.00
3,000.00
$ 61,510.00
Phase I
Cost ApportIonment
The' County Is proposed to cover the cost of catch basins and leads to serve the
County Road, pi us a portIon of the remaInIng storm sewer based on Its "BasIc
Area SharIng RatIo", pius 8% of the engineering fees. A 5% contingency Is also
I nct uded.
; I
fJaslc Area SharIng RatIo (County)
EstImated Total Acreage of BenefIt
EstImated HIghway RIght-of-way
11.0 Acres
3.7 Acres
BasIc Area SharIng RatIo = 2(3.7)/11.0 = 67.3% (County)
* Catch Bas I n and lead Construct I on Cost = $14 ~420
RemaInIng Storm Sewer Lateral = $61,510 - $14,420 = $47,090
Total Pounty Share of Storm Sewer
$47,090 (0.673) + $14,420 + 8% EngineerIng + 5% ContIngencIes =
$31,690 + $14,420 + $3,690 + $2,300 =
Total ~ Share of Storm Sewer
$61,510.00 + $3~ Project Cost - County Share =
$61,510.00 + $18,450 - $52,100 =
Total EstImated Project Cost
o
$ 52,100.00
$ ?7 .860.00
$ 79,960.00
Storm Sewer
l:'i38- 11<11 NARY OJSI 1:51 I M/\ II:
Phase I I
Crosstown Boulevard Realignment
Bunker Lake Boul evard to 139th Avenue NW
City Project 88-1
Andover, Minnesota I
Commission No. 9128
Item
No. Description
Quantity
.sIRllI
1 Mobilization
2 20' Span Bridge
3 Common Excavation
4 Granul ar Borrow
5 Subgrade Preparation
6 CI ass 5 Gravel
7 Tack Coat
8 Bituminous Base 2332
9 Bituminous Binder 2332
10 Bituminous Wear
11 Bituminous Material
12 Seedl ng
13 Soddl ng
14 Topsoil
1 5 Seed
16 Fedll Izer.
17 Mulch Material
18 SII t Fence
19 Geotextlle Fabric
20 18" Culvert
21" 18" RCP Flared End Section w/TG
4 EA
1 LS
5,300 CY
14,000 CY
18 RS
4,120 GA
570 GA
1 ,260 TN
630 TN
470 TN
132 TN
1.9 AC
1,200 SY
1,200 SY
95 LB
950 LB
3.8 TN
3,500 LF
17,000 SY
1 00 LF
2 EA
Total Estimated Construction Cost - Street
Cost Apportionment
Unit
Price Amount
$ 5,500.00 $ 22,000.00
$95,000.00 $ 95,000.00
$ 1.50 $ 7,950.00
$ 4.00 $ 56,000.00
$ 100.00 $ 1,800.00
$ 6.50 $ 26,780.00
$ 1.50 $ 860.00
$ 13.00 $ 16,380.00
$ 13.00 $ 8,190.00
$ 14.00 $ 6,580.00
$ 160.00 $ 21,1 20.00
$ 300.00 $ 570.00
$ 3.00 $ 3,600.00
$ 7.50 $ 9,000.00
$ 4.40 $ 380.00
$ 0.40 $ 3,800.00
$ 250.00 $ 950.00
$ 3.80 $ 13,300.00
$ 1.60 $ 27,200.00
$ 21.00 $ 2;100.00
$ 450.00 $ 900.00
$274,060.00
Phase II
r
The County Is proposed to cover the construction costs pi us 8% of the
engineering fees. A 5% contingency Is also Included.
Total Pounty Share of Street
$274,060 Cost + 8% Englneerln!;1 + 5% Contingency =
Total ~ Share of Street
$310,780.00
$274,060 Cost + 30% Project Cost - County Share =
$ 45,500.00
~.
c~
~~I
Q
Regula~ City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 2, 1988
Page 9
INSTALLATION OF FIRE HYDRANTS/FIRE DEPARTMENT
Council ag~eed the hyd~ants should be Included In one of the bids of
the up-coming contracts, noting the estimated cost of $1,500 each. It
was also noted that a hyd~ant Is also needed on the south side of
Bunke~ Lake Bouleva~d In the vicinity of the Junkya~ds (Tonson/s and
Mom/s Auto Pa~ts>. M~. Stone stated he has asked the FI~e Chief to
~ecommend a location fo~ a hyd~ant In that area.
APPROVE JUNKYARD LICENSE/ATV SALVAGE
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Apel, app~oval of the 1988 license fo~
ATV Salvage. DISCUSSION: Councilman O~ttel questioned g~antlng a
license seven months afte~ It Is due, not unde~standlng why steps
hadn/t been taken to ~evoke the license.
Mike ? . owner of ATV SalvaQe - stated he has been to the City
Hall five times to talk to the Clerk and called five bthe~ times In an
attempt to get eve~ythlng cla~lfled. The City Inspected his ya~d In
Feb~ua~y and came back one othe~ time where the~e we~e ca~s In the
aisle. It was du~lng the work day and It was on the main lane that
they use, but they do keep the fl~e lanes open at nlght~ The cyllnde~s
have all been secured since the Inspection. He expressed frustration
that It has taken this long to get everything done, because the City
Inspects and tells him what to do but never comes back to ~elnspect
It. He paid fo~ the license and had his Insurance and bond befo~e the
fl~st of the year, but his ya~d was not Inspected until the ~Iddle of
February. He again stated he called nume~ous times and neve~ ~ecelved
calls back and stopped In the office many times In an attempt to get
this cleared up.
Council asked that for the next meeting the Staff p~epa~e a report on
the numbe~ of ya~ds operating without a license and what happened In
this Instance ~egardlng the licenSing of ATV Salvage, as It should not
take this long to license an operation.
Motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION CONSOLIDATING PROJECTS
Attorney Hawkins advised going through the 429 p~ocedu~e fo~ P~oJect
88-1 to assess some po~tlon of the p~oJect so the funds from the bond
can be released.
o
MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Apel, a Resolution receiving a
feasibility repo~t and calling for public hearing of Improvements of
streets and storm drainage, ProJect No. 88-1, that the pUblic hearing
be held on August 16. (See Resolution R174-88) Motion carried
unanimously. .
.:
: .;
',-"
Ji'AV- /
d~,~.t.~ 0
,
@
Special City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 4, 1988
Page 7
(Tonson Th-e Perml t, ,Cont I nued)
Af~er a brief discussion, the Council agreed to take no action at this
time. Councilman Elling stated he would talk with various County
officials tomorrow' to determine what Is taking place.
LETTER/REI ROBERT KEENE/UNDERLIFF
Mayor Wlndschltl noted the letter with. JO signatures requesting
assistance In dealing with a noise prOblem In their neighborhood,
primarily loud music being placed at the residence of Robert and Marge
Keene. 14269 Undfercllff Street.
. It was agreed to table the Item to the next meeting, asking that the
Deputy submit a report ~n the matter.
UNIVERSITY AVENUE EASEMENT ACQUISITION
Mr. Schrantz reported Ms. Baldridge has agreed to Sign the easement
needed for the road Improvement on University Avenue.
CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD PROJECT
Mayor Wlndschltl explained the Attorney has suggested the Council go
.through the 429 procedure to assess a portion of the Crosstown
Boulevard project so the bond for the project can be released.
Schrantz said the Attorney has recommended holding the hearing
August 16. Council agreed, noting formal action will be taken
August 9 work session.
Mr.
on
at the
APPROVAL OF CLAIM
MOTION by Knight,. Seconded by Apel, to void Check 14850 for an
amount of $2,400.53, and approve Check 15070 for an amount of
$4~268.82 to W. B. Miller, Inc. Motion carried unanimously.
PARK BOARD/FOX MEADOWS
o
Park Board Chairman Marc McMullen reported the Park. Board decided not
to do the Fox Meadows park this year because of the many questions
Involved with the exit of CoRd 58 onto CoRd 7. The Park Board does
not like the park access off of CoRd 58, and there Is a lot of
opposition from the residents to access off of Fox Street. Because.so
much hinges on what happens to the Intersection of. CoRds 58 and 7,
they have agreed to table any further action.
,-----
'Y t.;)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
8i':> - i
~
DATE Auqust 16, 1988
ITEM
NU Public Hearing/88-1
Crosstown Blvd. 4.
BY:James E. Schrantz
APP.'~.~~~OR
AGEr; (J(j
ad
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The city Council has ordered a public hearing for Project 88-1
Crosstown Boulevard to discuss the cost of storm drainage.
Attached is a copy of the notice and letter mailed to the property
owners.
This project needs to be a 429 proj~ct for bonding purposes.
The Council will have to.order the project by a 4/5 vote.
..
MOTION BY
o TO
Ko
~
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
(b
./
~./ '.
,.r:'
o
~-
. -
-.I'
XP08-1/CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD
33 32 24 11 0011
wilber & Doris Schultz
13988 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
33 32 24 11 0015
Louis Rosburg
2407 - 139th Avenue NW
Andover~ MN 55304
33 32 24 11 0046
Thomas & M.L. Paulson
13993 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
33 32 24 11 0001
Timothy & Becky Kostreba
. 13974 C~osstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
)3 32 24 11 0010
Roman Przezdziecki
14006 Crosstown Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
33 32 24 11 0008
Thomas & M.L. Paulson
13993 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
33 32 24 11 0009
Lee & P.M Valsvik
14018 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
33 32 24 11 0007
Duwayne & D.M. Meyers
14021 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
33 32 24 11 0006
Thomas O. May
14034 Crosstown Blvd.
~ndover, ~N .55304
34 32 24 22 0007
Larry Hensrud
14041 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
33 32 24 11 0003
Daniel Esselman
14052 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN ~5304
33 32 24 11 0016
Louis Rosburg
2407 - 139th Ave. NW
Andover, MN 55304
34 32 24 22 0025
Gregory & Phyllis Anderson
14031 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
34 32 24 22 0024.
Kenneth & June Mtller
14027 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
o
.. .._~....-.. ................_h......_... ....._........ . ." ......_ ~
'. P.... . .
..................,. ..'1"'.,'...-.... ....;...-........... ....'t......
. ,.t
;--
,
\0r
....
:~;:.)
@
Regula~ City Council Meeting
Minutes ~ August 16, 1988
Page 4
HIDDEN CREEK/RECEIVE PETITION FOR STREET LIGHTS
MOTION by O~ttel, Seconded by Knight. Int~oduclng a Resolution
dec1a~lng adequacy of petition and o~de~lng p~epa~atlon of a
feasibility ~epo~t fo~ the Imp~ovements of st~eet lighting, P~oJect
No. 88-27, In the Hidden C~eek a~ea as p~esented. (See Resolution
R179-88) DISCUSSION:
Jan Ande~son. 13683 Yukon Street NW - explained the colo~ coding on
the map of.' thel~ subdivision, noting the f~ont pa~t of the development
had an ove~whelmlng maJo~lty showing Inte~estlng in the p~oJect. It
has been ~econunended that the location along 135th Lane wou,ld be a
cut-off point. Mayo~ Windschltl explained the City has the abIlity of
splitting a p~oJect.
Steve Youts. 13691 Yukon - asked how long a feasibility study will
take. Mayo~ Wlndschltl didn't think It would take ve~y long, but
noted the p~oblems ~ecently encountered with the elect~ic company
~ega~ding up-f~ont cha~ges.
Ms. Anderson - asked If they will be notified afte~ the feasibility
stUdy. Mayo~ Windschitl stated yes.
Georae Osell. 2515 134th - asked If It Is possible to put st~eet
lights up to 135th. Mayo~ Wlndschitl stated yes, ~econunending a
petition also be circulated In that a~ea so the Council has an
indication of the ~esidents' interest.
MotIon carried unanImously.
..... .~._~. ..~. .... M ,.
['PUBLIC HEARING/88-1/CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD '.;.
Mayor Wlndschitl called the public hearing to orde~ at 8:09 p.m. M~.
Rodebe~g reviewed the feasibility report of the reconstruction and
storm sewer line along Crosstown Bouleva~d f~om 140th to 139th. The
total storm sewer cost Is estimated at $80,000, but the county will
pick up about $52,000. The City's share is $29,000, a portion of
which is to be assessed to the residents. If It we~e totally
assessed, it would ~esult In approximately $1,700 per lot. He
understood the notices went out for an assessment of approximately
$100 per lot.
Atto~ney Hawkins noted the City needed to run the 429 p~ocedure and
assess someone because the bonds were sold on the basis that it would
be a 429 project. It Is up to the Council to determine who or how
much will be assessed.
o
;. ,._~:~
.!;fJ"
#'.'"
,
.,",
",.
/
\(:r Regular:Clty Council
r ~lnutes - August 16,
I Page 5
,I
\.
,-.
Meeting
1988
.
.
(Public Hearlng/88-1/Crosstown Boulevard, Continued>
Councilman Orttel noted there we~e no assessments on the othe~ portion
of~the Improvement because the City picked up the cost out of the
State Aid account. He suggested not assessing any of the abutting
p~operty owne~s but assess only the City prope~ty for some portion of
the costs. At some point the Council should determine a specific
polley on t~unk sewer along county roads so the residents are awa~e of
what will happen.
The other Councilmen agreed not to assess abutting property owne~s but
. only to assess the City property. The state Aid fund would pick up
the sho~tage.
Mayor Wlndschltl briefly reviewed the plans for the construction of
the relocated Crosstown Boulevard south of 139th through the lowland
and Its continuation through Coon Rapids, and the county long-range
plans for Intersections to County 242, the new Rlverdale shopping
center, and Highway 10. The residents will not lose thel~ driveway
access onto the road. Mr. Rodeberg explained the conduit for stop
lights Is being installed at 139th and Crosstown so lights can be
Installed when the.trafflc warrants. For now, there will be stop
signs.
Mayor Windschltl asked for a motion to close the publiC portion of the
hearing.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Apel, to so move. Motion car~led
unanimously.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Apel, a Resolution o~de~lng thb
Improvement of streets and storm drainage construction for ProJect No.
SS-1 In the Cr:-osstown Boulevar:-d ar:-ea from Bunker:- Lake Boulevar:-d to
140th Avenue as presented. <See Resolution R1SO-SS> Motion carried
unanimously.
REQUEST SPEED STUDY/BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD
MOT'ION by Knight, Seconded by Apel, that we r:-equest MnDOT to do a
speed study on Bunker Lake Boulevard from Round Lake Boulevard to the
Burlington Northern tracks. Motion carried unanimously.
REQUEST SPEED STUDY/FOX STREET
o
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Apel, Introducing a motion directing
the City Staff to contact the Minnesota Department of Transportation
to conduct a speed study on Fox Street from County Road 20 to Valley-
Drive. Motion carried unanimously.
..
",
"~(~)
9\ .,,"
...... ,_:fl
..""?t..,~
~
CITY of ANDOVER
1665 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
August 5, 1988
Re: Project 88-1, Crosstown Boulevard
Dear Resident:
The City Council has scheduled a Public Hearing to discuss the
improvements on Crosstown Boulevard.
The estimated cost to construct Crosstown Boulevard from Bunker
Lake Boulevard to 140th Avenue is $709,200. '
Anoka County will pay all cost except for half the cost of the
concrete curb and gu~ter and 33% of the storm drainage. The
City'S Collector Street Fund and City owned property will be
assessed the majority of the remaining costs. .
It is proposed to assess the abutting property owners an amount
not to exceed'$100 per lot.
Sincerely,
OF ANDOVER
,
-
J mes E. Schrantz
ity Engineer
JES:kmt
o
-.--.......... ................-......._....0 ..._.......... .
~
.
t.
..; "',-...., '. .....
'.{(~
. I,;",
'0 ..........
.... .. .",.,. ~ ,,'..
... ......, ........... ... .~... ... ..
; .
. . .
"@
o
\",'
'..:...1
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. Rl74-88
MOTION by Councilman
Ellinq
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING
ON IMPROVEMENTS OF STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE, PROJECT NO. 88-1, IN
THE CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD AREA.
WHEREAS, a feasibility report has been prepared by TKDA for the
improvement of streets and storm drainage'in the Crosstown Boulevard
area1 and
WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be
feasib~e for an estimated cost of $709,200.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for
Project No. 88-1, for the improvement of streets and storm
drainage in the Crosstown Boulevard area as prepared by TKDA.
2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance with
the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or
a portion of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of
$709,200.
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement
on the 16th day of Auqust , 1988 in t~e Council Chambers
of the City Hall at 8:00 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed
and published notice of such hearing and improvement as
required bylaw.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
Apel
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Reqular'
meeting this
2nd'
day of Auqust
,
1988 with Councilmen Windschitl, Orttel, Apel, Kniqht, Ellinq
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
none
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
:
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
~......... 1t.J' # ",;.z/
rr Windschi tl.. - Mayor
. U-uJ 1;/1-
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o. .!
" -- --- i'-------- ___I _...L..-_ ~
:i:
,
<,
.0
'"
"
\1
'~,.,
.~
'.".
-~,
~
~-,"'-
~
~
t>i8~D-c
~~~;s)
~:
"j
1
I
I O'I~ 1i>1~~1 ""Ii!l '&I~i
:...;;.1....
.
L
~I 'i
BLVD.
IN
,'1
34'"
"
~
,
I!
:'
~~KDA
T.OL TZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NA llONAl BANk eU1LDING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 5510..,893
6121292.4400
FAX 612/292-0083
Apr II 26, 1988
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, f.fl 55304
Re: Crosstown Boul evard (County Road 18)
City Project 88-1
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9128
Dear Mayor and Council:
The fol lowing Is a status report of estimated cost for reconstruction and
relocation of County Road 18 from Coon Creek on the north to 133rd Avenue
NW at the south Andover corporate limits. The projects are phased as
follows:
Project 1 - Verdin Street e133rd Avenue to Bunker lake Boulevard)
Project 2 - Crosstown Boul evard ( Bunker lake Boulevard to 139th
Avenue)
Project 3 - Crosstown Boul evard ( 139th Avenue NW to 1 40th Avenue NW)
Project 4 - Crosstown Boul evard ( 140th Avenue NW to Coon Creek)
Contractor County City Total
Proj ect No. 1 ,
Gammon Brothers $ 83,550.00 $ 17,020.00 $ 100,570.00
Anderson Brothers $201.700.00 S 84,020.00 S 285.720.00
Total $285,250.00 $101,040.00 $ 386,290.00
Project No. 2 356,280.00
Estimated eStreet) $310,780.00 $ 45,500.00 $
Project No. 3
Estl mated estreet & Storm Sewer) $224,560.00 $ 62,230.00 $ 286,790.00
Project No. 4 $ 631.330.00
Barbarossa and Sons $371.280.00 $260.050.00
Total - All Projects $1,191,870.00 $468,820.00 $1,660,690.00
0
,..0
\. ' ;
~'
Honorable Mayor and CIty CouncIl
Andover, MInnesota
Apr II 26, 1 988
Page Two
The estImates are prepared wIth the County share of estImated constructIon
cost to Include 8~ engIneerIng fee for the County's proportIonate share of
the constructIon cost.
CIty share of constructIon wll I Include 1/2 of the cost of concrete curb
and gutter, al I cost of engineering In excess of 8~ of the County's share,
fiscal, legal and adminIstratIve costs. The'Clty wll I also pay for storm
sewer costs for service to the draInage area In excess of twIce the area of
the County Road rIght-of-way as It related to the total area draIned.
No costs have been Included for the City's responsIbIlIty to secure right-
of-way.
No costs for mItIgation for wetlands Is Included.
We recommend that the JoInt powers agreement be amended to reflect these
prelImInary costs subject to actual fInal constructIon costs beIng shared
on an equIvalent basIs.
Sincerely yours,
~~~
JLD:J
Attachments
o
~
o
PRE! IMINARY roST ESTIMATE
PROJ ECT NO. 1 A
VERDI N SlREET - 133RD AVENUE TO BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD
CITY PROJECT 87-6
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
(GAMM:>N BROTHERS)
Total County Grading Construction Cost
8% Engineering
Total County Share of City Project 87-6 (Project No. IA)
Total ~ Share of City Project 87-6 (Project No. IAl:
$77,357.75 + 30% Project Cost - County Share =
$77,357 .75 + $23 ,207 .33 - $83 ,546 .37 =
$ 77,357 .75
$ 83 ,546 .37
(87-6 Total)
$ 17,018.71
(87-6' Total)
o
"-= PRB IMINARY roST ESTIMATE
PROJ ECT NO. 1 B
VERDI N SlREET - 133RD AVENUE TO BUNKER LAKE BOULEY ARD
CITY PROJECT 87-6B
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
(ANDERSON BROTHERS)
Item
No. DescrIptIon
QuantIty
Unit
PrIce
Streets
1 Streets - Proposal 2
2 - 1/2 Curb Cost
T ota I County Street Constr uct Ion Cost
Catch BasIn and leads
1 15" RCP, Class 5
2 15" RCP FI ared End Sect I on w/TG
3 Catch BasI ns
4 Rip Rap
5 Geotextlle Engineering FabrIc
510 LF
2 EA
6 EA
5.8 CY
7 SY
$ 18.90
$ 41 2.50
$ 890.00
$ 33.00
$ 2.34
Total County Storm Sewer Construct I on Cost
Total County Construction Cost (87-6B)
8% Engineering
Total County Share of City Project 87-6B (Project No. 1B)
TOTAL rollNTY SHARE OF VERDIN SlREET (Project No.1)
Total ~ Share of City Project 87-6B (Project No. lB):
(Based on total Proposal 2 (Verdin Street) estimated cost
of $219,790 for Project 87-68)
$219,790 + 3fJ!, Project Cost - County Share =
$219,790 + $65,935 - $201,705 =
Total ~ Share of VerdIn Street (Project No.1)
- --- -------------------
'-rr7A nt:..n f'__.a. .L -:rrd. D_....I__... ("t...._.... _ f'_.._~. e:I-.!!Io"'_!!"'!!
Amount
$184,382.35
-$ 13.630.00
$170,752.35
$ 9,639.00
$ 825.00
$ 5,340.00
$ 191 .40
$ 16.38
$ 16,011.78
$186,764.13
1; 14,941.13
$201,705.26
(87-6B Total)
$285,251 .63
,
,
$ 84,020
(87-6B Total)
$101 ,040
c: A 0;: 0;: nn nn
o
The County Is proposed to cover al I street construction costs, except for half
of the curb and gutter cost, plus 8% of the engineering fees. A 5% contingency
Is also Included.
Total County Share of Street <Project No.3):
$159,100 - 1/2 Curb Cost + 8% Engineering + 5% contingencies =
$159,100 - $6,480 + $12,210 + $7,630 =
$172,460.00
Total ~ Share of Street <Project No.3)
$159,100 + 30% Project Cost - County Share =
$159,100 + $47,730 - $172,460 =
Total Estimated Project Cost <Project No.3)
.t 34.370.00
$206,830.00
Street
@
PRE! I MINARY roST ESTI MATE
Project No. 3
Crosstown Boulevard Realignment
139th Avenue to 140th AvenueNW
CIty Project 88-1
Andover, Minnesota
Item
No. Description
Quanti ty
UnIt
Price
Amount
STORM S~ER
*1 12" RCP CI ass 5 Storm Sewer 190 IF $ 18.00 $ 3,420.00
2 15" RCP CI ass 5 Storm Sewer 480 IF $ 19.00 $ 9,120.00
3 18" RCP CI ass 5 Storm Sewer 520 IF $ 21.00 $ 10,920.00
4 21" RCP Class 3 Storm Sewer 1 90 IF $ 23 .00 $ 4,370.00
5 24" RCP Class 3 Storm Sewer 80 IF $ 25.00 $ 2,000.00
6 24" RCP Flared End Sect I on w/TG 1 EA $ 550.00 $ 550.00
*7 Catch BasI n 10 EA $ 1 ,1 00.00 $ 11 ,000.00
8 Random Rip Rap Type III 5.8 CY $ 50.00 $ 290.00
9 Geotextlle FabrIc 9 Sy $ 1 0.00 $ 90.00
10 Outlet Structure (to Coon Creek) 1 lS $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
11 SiltatIon Pond Construction 4,500 CY $ 1.50 $ 6,750.00
12 SIltatIon Pond Structure (Weir) 1 lS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
13 Extend Ex. Red Oaks Manor Storm Sewer 1 lS $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00
14 RestoratIon 1 lS .$ 3,000.0.0 .$ 3.000.00
Total Estimated ConstructIon Cost - Storm Sewer $ 61,510.00
Cost ApportIonment
The County Is proposed to cover the cost of catch basIns and leads to serve the
County Road, pI us a portIon of the remalnl ng storm sewer based on Its "Basic
Area SharIng RatIo", plus 8% of the engineering fees. A 5% contIngency Is also
I ncl uded.
BasIc Area Sharing RatIo (County)
Estimated Total Acreage of BenefIt
Estimated HIghway RIght-of-way
,
,
11.0 Acres
3.7 Acres
BasIc Area SharIng RatIo = 2(3.7)/11.0 = 67.3% (County)
* Catch BasIn and lead ConstructIon Cost = $14,420
RemaInIng Storm Sewer lateral = $61,510 - $14,420 = $47,090
Total County Share of Storm Sewer' (Project No.3)
$47,090 (0.673) + $14,420 + 8% EngIneerIng + 5% ContIngencies =
$31,690 + $14,420 + $3,690 + $2,300 =
$ 52,100.00
o
Total ~ Share of Storm Sewer (Project No.3)
$61,510.00 + $30% Project Cost -County Share =
$61,510.00 + $18,450 - $52,100 =
Total EstImated Project Cost (Project No: 3)
.$ ?7 ,860.00
$ 79,960.00
Storm Sewer
OOST ESTIMATE (f"ROM RARRAROSSA AND SONS)
ProJ ect No. 4
CrosstCldn Boul evard
g ProJect 87-3B
Andover, MInnesota
STORM SEWER
Item UnIt
No. DAscrlptlon QuantI tv Pr Ice Amount
1 12" RCP CI ass 5 Storm Sewer 414 LF $ 23.00 $ 9,522.00
2 15" RCP CI ass 5 storm Sewer 179 LF $ 24.00 $ 4,296 .00
3 18" RCP CI ass 3 Storm Sewer 1 54 LF $ 25.00 $ 3,850.00
4 21" RCP Class 3 Storm Sewer 100 LF $ 27 .00 $ 2,700.00
5 27" RCP CI ass 3 Storm Sewer 674 LF $ 31 .00 $ 20,894.00
6 30" RCP CI ass 3 Storm Sewer 83 LF $ 39.00 $ 3,237.00
7 3D" RCP CI ass 3 Storm Sewer 602 LF $ 40.00 $ 24,080.00
8 3D" RCP Flared End Sect I on 1 EA $ 800.00 $ 800.00
9 4' DIameter Catch BasIn w/Sump 20 EA $ 800.00 $ 16,000.00
10 5' DIameter Catch BasIn (6-2) 1 EA $1,150.00 $ 1,150.00
11 4' DIameter Manhole 0-10' 3 EA $ 900.00 $ 2,700.00
12 5' DIameter Manhole 0-10' 3 EA $1 ,150.00 $ 3,450.00
13 Random RIp Rap Class IV 40 CY $ 60.00 $ 2,400.00
14 Granular FIlter 15 CY $ 40.00 $ 600.00
$ 95,679.00
COST ESTIMATE (FROM RARBAROSSA AND SONS)
ProJect No.4
CrosstCldn Boulevard Trunk
ProJect 87-3B
Andover, MInnesota
STREETS
Item UnIt
No. DescrIption QuantI tv PrIce Amount
1 BIt Pavement Removal/DIsposal 9,067 SY $ 0.65 $ 5,893.55
2 86-24 Curb and Gutter 8,075 LF $ 4.95 $ 39,971.25
3 Common ExcavatIon 25,920 CY $ 1.90 $ 49,248.00
4 CI ass 5 Gravel 9,544.8 TN $ 5.45 $ 52,019.16
5 Tack Coat 2,420 GA $ 1.00 $ 2,420.00
6 BIt BInder Course MIxture 2,720 TN $ 10.24 $ 27 ,852.80
7 BIt Base Course Mixture 2,720 TN $ 10.24 $ 27,852.80
8 Bit Wear Course Mixture 2,087 TN $ 12.37 $ 25,816.19
9 AC B It MaterIal for Binder 171 TN $ 152.00 $ 25,992.00
10 AC B It MaterIal for MIx 171 TN $ 152.00 $ 25,992.00
11 AC B It Mater I al for Mix 2341 115 TN $ 152.00 $ 17,480.00
12 Topsol-I Borrow 2,000 CY $ 5.00 $ 10,000.00
13 Seed Mixture No. 5 111 LB $ 3.10 $ 344.10
14 Roadside Seeding 2.2 AC $ 275.00 $ 605.00
15 Mulch MaterIal Type I 3.9 TN $ 175.00 $ 682.50
16 Comm FertilIzer 10-10-10 1,110 LB $ 0.20 $ 222.00
17 TraffIc Control SIgns 1 LS $5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
0 18 Temp. Port. Concrete Barrier 650 LF $ 10.00 $ 6,500.00
19 Concrete Valley Gutter 3 EA $2,000.00 $ 6,000.00
$329,891.35
Change Order No. 1 (Work In narrow rlgh.....of-way) $ 23,110.00
Change Order No. 2 (RetaInIng Wall> $ 36.955.00
$389,956.35
e
ffiOJ ECT NO.4
-STORM SEWER OOST APFURTlONMENT (REV ISED>
CROSSTOWN BOULEV ARD TRUNK (87-38>
ANDOVER. MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER OONSTRlICT ION
County Catch Basi n and lead Benef It
I telil
No.
t
2
3
9
10
UnIt
PrIce
S 23 .00
$ 24.00
$ 25.00
$800.00
$100.00*
DescrIptIon
12" RCP CI 5 Storm Sewer (CB Lead)
15" RCP Q 5 Storm Sewer (CB Lead)
18" RCP Q 5 storm Sewer (CB Lead) .
std 4' DIameter Catch Basin
5' DIameter Catch BasIn Castlng*
QuantIty
332 LF
156 IF
91 LF
18 EA
t EA
Amount
S 7,636.00
$ 3,744.00
$ 2,275.00
$14,400.00
100.00
$28,155.00
Total EstImated County BenefIt ConstructIon Cost
* EstImated Cost
RemaInIng ConstructIon Cost
Total Storm Sewer ConstructIon Cost
Total EstImated County BenefIt
Total RemainIng ConstructIon Cost
$ 95,679.00
-$ 28.155.00
$ 67,524.00
Total COntrIbutIng Areas
Crosstown Boul evard CCSAH 18) R-Q-W, 2800' x 100' 6.43 Acres
South Coon Creek DrIve (MSA) 793' x 60' 1.09 Acres
.
Total State AId ProJect R-Q-l'l 7.52 Acres
p
p
Total ContrIbutIng Area, Including above R-Q-W 47.74 Acres
o
Based on the "State AId Manual", Section 5-892.600, since the adJacent area Is
predominantly resIdentIal, the sharIng ratIo shal I be determIned by doubling
the State Aid Street area and uslng.the doubled area agaInst the-actual total
area to determIne the spl It area.
ffiOJECT NO.4 (OONTINlIED>
ANOKA OOUNTY SHARE OF STORM SEWER
~ The BasIc Area SharIng RatIo for Anoka County Is:
2(6.43 Acres)/47.74 Acres = 26.94%
County Catch Bas I n and Lead Benef It
County lateral Storm Sewer ConstructIon BenefIt
0.2694 x $67,524.00 =
Total County Storm Sewer ConstructIon BenefIt
8% EngIneerIng
Total EstImated County Share of Storm Sewer
M.S.A. (SOITH OOON CREEK DRIVE) SHARE OF STORM SEWER
$28,155.00
$18.190.97
$46 ,345 .97
$ 3.707.68
$50,053.65
2<1.09 Acres)/47.74 Acres = 4.57%
The BasIc Area SharIng RatIo for South Coon Creek DrIve Is:
MSA Lateral Storm Sewer ConstructIon BenefIt:
0.0457 x $56,524.00 =
30% ProJect Expenses
Total Estl mated MSA Share of Storm Sewer
$ 3,085.85
$ 925.75
$ 4,01 1 .60
Estimated Total Storm Sewer ProJect Cost
CITY SHARE OF STORM SEWER (40.22 ESTIMATED ACRES OF BENEFIT>
1.3 x $95,679.00.=
Total County .Share
Total. MSA Share
Total EstImated ~ Share of Storm Sewer
(= $1,748.32/Acre or 4.0 cents/SF)
o
$124,382.70
-$ 50,053.65
-$ 4,011.60
$ 70,317.45
ffiOJECT NO.4
STREET OOST APFURTIONMENT (REV ISED)
CROSSTOWN BOUI EV ARD TRIINK (87-38)
ANDOVER. MINNESOTA
&>
CI TY SHARE OF STREET OONSTRIICT ION
CIty Share Is based on replacIng the existing roadway and paying for half of
the curb. The existing roadway Is 3,400 lineal feet, 24 feet wide with 3" of
bituminous surface, and 4" of Class 5 gravel.
Bituminous: 3,400 LF x 24' x 3"/12" x CY/27CF x
2.TN/CY x $12.37 =
011 for Bituminous: 1,511 TN x 6.3% x $152.00 =
Class 5: 3,400 LF x 29' x 4"/12" x CY/27 CF x
2 TN/CY x $5.45 =
Estimated Total Roadway Replacement Construction Cost
Curb and Gutter: 8,0~5 LF x 0.5 x $4.95/LF
Concrete Val ley Gutter: 5 EA x 0.5 x $2,000.00/Each
Change Order No.1 (Work In narrow rIght-of-way)
EstImated ~ Share of Street ConstructIon
COUNTY SHARE OF STREET OONSTRlICT ION
EstImated Total Street ConstructIon Cost
EstImated ~ Share of Street ConstructIon
EstImated County Share of Street ConstructIon
TOT/It STREET FROJECT COST DISTR IBUTION
EstImated County Share of Street Construction
8% EngIneerIng
Total County Share of Street
Total ~ Share of Street
($389,956.35 x 1.3) - $321,223.90 =
\Q
$ 18,692.44
$ 14,470.00
$ 13.268.40
$ 46,431.24
$ 19,985.63
$ 3,000.00
$ 23,110.00
$ 92,526.85
$389,956.35
-$ 92,526.85
$249,429.50
Pp
$297,429.50
$ 23.794.40
$321 ,223 .90
$185,719.36
e
o
PROJ ECT NO.4
TOTJIl STORM SEWER AND STREET OOST APFURTIONMENT
CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD TRUNK (87-38)
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
Anoka County
MSA (South Coon Creek Drlve/Clty)
CIty of Andover
Total Prolect Cost
Storm
Sewer
Street
Total
$ 50,053.65 $321,223.90 $371,277.55
$ 4,011.60 $
0.00 $ 4,011.60
$ 70.317.45 $189.719.36 $256,036.81
$124,382.70 $506,943.26 $631 .325.96
,0
,
~.
Regular CIty CouncIl MeetIng
MInutes - AprIl 4, 1989
Page 5
(SherIff WIlkinson, Continued)
representatIves was to clean up the CIty. Responding to some of the
complaints In the ResIdent Forum thIs evenIng, he thought that only
warnIngs or clean-up notices were beIng gIven, not cItatIons. He was
not concerned so much about the DeputIes enforcing the ordInance~ but
If there are any complaInts about the way the DeputIes are presentIng
and conduct 1 ng themse I ves, _ then he wou I d 11 ke to know about 1 t .
SherIff WIlkInson reported they are makIng progress computerIzIng the
SherIff;s Department, so they will have more current and accurate
InformatIon concernIng the operations In the CIty. He revIewed the
crIme trends In Andover In 1988, notIng burglarIes have dropped 60
percent and that other crImes tend to be lower as well. However,
narcotIcs has had a sIgnIfIcant Increase In Andover as well as around
the county. The SherIff also revIewed the specIal actIvItIes done In
Andover durIng 1988 IncludIng a specIal buglary detaIl, traffIc
enforcement; speed enforcement proJect on Seventh Avenue, specIal
enforcement proJect on Round Lake regardIng the snowmobIle problem,
the Tonson tIre fIre, and the operatIon at the Vapors establIshment.
SherIff WIlkinson also noted one of Andover;s concerns in the past has
been the amount of time Andover Deputies spend responding to calls for
\ aId outsIde of the CIty. They have found that Andover is benefitting
more from reciprocal calls than It Is assIsting others.
.0
'..
The SherIff also renewed his offer to set up a Law Enforcement
Committee to establish a more routine communications system between
the residents, City, and Sheriff;s Department. He would provide a
staff level person to meet wIth a delegatIon of the City;s choice and
at the City;s convenience. Mayor Elling stated he is in therprocess
of setting up such a committee and will be bringing it up for Council
approval shortly. Mayor Elling also asked if the construction of the
Sheriff;s garage is still being proposed to be In Andover.
Sheriff Wilkinson stated he presented that proposal to the Capital
Improvements Committee and was not aware any change had been made. The
Council then thanked the Sheriff and expressed appreciation for the
servIces being provided.
RED OAKS MANOR/CROSSTOWN STORM DRAIN
Mr. Rodeberg reviewed the handout regardIng the storm sewer proJect
along Crosstown Boulevard north of 140th Including costs and a
proposed assessment area. One alternative would be to assess the
entire trIbutary area at four cents per square foot, but to then
except a 200-foot strIp abuttIng the roadway whIch the CIty would
carry. The 200 feet Is derIved from a 150-foot lot plus 50 feet of
o
"-
Regula~ City Council Meeting
Minutes - Ap~il 4, 1989
Page 6
(Red Oaks Mano~/C~osstown Sto~m D~ain, Continued)
~ight of way along the ~oadway, feeling this may be somewhat
equIvalent to what was done along C~osstown south of 140th whe~e the
Council did not to assess fo~ sto~m d~aInage. ThIs p~oJect dIffe~s
in that It has a much la~ge~ t~ibuta~y a~ea. All othe~ MSA and county
p~oJects have had only minimal sto~m d~ainage wo~k done; this is the
only one that has a t~ibuta~y a~ea beyond 200 feet of the ~oadway
itself. The sto~m sewe~ was designed and sized to take care of the
larger area, which includes Shady Knoll, Kensington Estates, etc. Mr.
Rodebe~g explained the amount of money in question is $70,317.45,
whIch Is Andover's share that Is not eligible for MSA or county
funding.
There was a ve~y lengthy delibe~ation as to what would be the best
course of action. Mr. Davidson felt the choices are to assess the
entire tributary a~ea, to not assess as was done on all other
projects, or to assess all but abate the 200-foot area from the
roadway. Mr. Schrantz explained if the Council chooses not to assess,
the money would not come out of the ad valorum; it would come out of
some improvement money. M~. Davidson explained it could come from
State Aid funds that have been. accumulated, or go back to the County
and ~enegotiate thei~ sha~e of the project, or use the maintenance
fund from State Aid, possibly sp~eading it ove~ a 20-year period to
pay for the storm sewer costs.
Jerrv Windschitl - asked if there is going to be a change in policy
and begin assessing along MSA roads, then how many years rectroactive
will it be.. He noted this project was completed two years ago; and if
the policy is changed to assess, other projects will be affected as
well. He asked that he be treated the same as everyone else. He also
went into detail showing how the county did not pay for its entire
share of the storm sewer system, plus they paid only 8 percent for
engineering, legal, and admInIstration. So some of that $70,000 is
actually the county's share for overhead and not a part of the storm
sewer costs. He calculated the City's share should only be $26,900,
not $70,000. Mr. WIndschitl didn't think it was reasonable to assess
the residents for money that should have been paId for by the county.
He asked the Council to direct TKDA to determIne the cost of a minimum
storm draInage system to handle Just the county road, which wIll prove
his point that the CIty's share should be far less than $70,000.
,-0
Councilmember Orttel was concerned that the overhead on the p~oJect is
not a direct benefit and is not being reimbursed by the county, which
means about 22 percent of the overhead on the project would have to be
paid for by Andover's residents. Other concerns raised by the
Council were where the funds would come from if the City adheres to
the policy of not assessIng along MSA or county roads, can the City
absorb the costs of these improvements in the future, and whether the
policy should be changed now or modIfied to assess areas beyond the
Immediate road area.
.0
Regular CIty CouncIl MeetIng
MInutes - AprIl 4, 1989
Page 7
,
'-
(Red Oaks Manor/Crosstown Storm DraIn, ContInued)
MOTION by KnIght, Seconded by Orttel, that we dIrect the CIty
AdmInIstrator to renegotIate wIth the county on that Issue and then
after getting the results on that, we brIng the Issue back for
resolutIon; and have TKDA calculate the mInImum storm sewer system for
the county road for the area In questIon. MotIon carrIed unanImously.
The CouncIl recessed at 9:48; reconvened at 9:57 p.m.
SONSTEBY SEWER REQUEST
Mr. Schrantz asked to talk to the MWCC regardIng Ms. Sonsteby's
request so see what theIr response would be. CouncIl suggested the
request be made in wrItIng and followed up by personal contact.
However, the intent would be not to reduce any of the MUSA already
allocated to the City. It was noted no escrow funds would be needed
at thIs tIme.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Jacobson, that the Council direct
Staff to submit a written request with whatever authorities need be
regardIng the matter of prOViding sewer servIce to the Sonsteby
property through the City of Anoka Interceptor System per the petitIon
of Rosella Sonsteby, and then converse wIth those authorItIes. Motion
carried unanimously.
AWARD QUOTES/NORTHWOODS TENNIS COURT
,-,>
Park and Recreation CommissIon Chairman Marc McMullen reviewed the
quotes for the northwoods Tennis Court and to award the contract to
Burt Kraabel Construction for Alternate B for $37,433.35. Mr. Haas
explained the cost is strictly for the tennIs court constructIon and
excavatIon. The eXisting fencing and lIghtIng will be used again. It
wIll cost $1,800 to remove the eXistIng fence and to put it back
again; however, that will be done by another company. Mr. Haas also
explaIned Alternate A had more select granUlar materIal than Alternate
B; however, he felt the materIal bid in B wIll be of sufficient
quality. They aiso plan to monItor It closely to be sure that correct
materIal Is beIng used.
ChaIrman McMullen explaIned they have $35,000 in the bUdget for this
proJect, and the remaInder wIll have to come out of park dedIcatIon.
He also noted the petItion In favor of reconstructIng the tennis court
from the resIdents in the neIghborhood; there was no oppositIon.
Mr. Rodeberg felt the material In Alternate A would have better
compactIon and would allow for better draInage; but If the materIal
for Alternate B Is tested ahead of tIme, he had no problem wIth It.
{ .
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
March 21, 1989
ITEM
NO.
Crosstown storm
Drain Outlet 5.
BY:
James E. Schrantz
FOR
Engineering
The City ~ouncil is requested to consider the storm drainage
assessment concerning Crosstown Boulevard. The last phase of the
storm drainage will be constructed as part of Kensington Estates
4th Addition. See attached memo from TKDA.
The Council did decide on the storm drainage involved with the
properties along Crosstown from 140th south that there wouldn't be
assessments to the abutting properties.
This will be discussed further at the meeting when John Davidson
and John Rodeberg will be there.
m~ . (uJ/kJd;;
1< 0 /";fvti7} ~ $.D. - v~-
/fNf ./1~
j)J ~ ~i, w- - 0
~~~
rj.. - t wv>./
~1
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
:2.-.47 ~
~
. ^
GKDA
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
T.0L TZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
~
,0
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101-1893
612/292-4400
FAX 612/292-0083
. March 15,1989
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
Re: Red Oaks/Crosstcwn Boul evard
Storm Drainage Outlet
Andover, Minnesota
CommIssIon No. 9140
Dear Mayor and Council:
No formal actIon has been taken, to our knowledge, to address the proposed
assessments and/or fundIng to cover trunk storm sewer benefIt for areas
served by the CrosstOdn Boul evard storm sewer outl et to Coon Creek, or the
proposed outl et from the Red Oaks Manor North Pond to Coon Creek. Both
areas were proposed, In earlIer feasIbility reports, to be assessed a trunk
storm sewer area charge.
The Crosstcwn Boul evard Storm Sewer was constructed as a part of ProJect
87-3B by Barbarossa and Sons. We proposed an area wIde assessment of
$0.04/SF to cover the CIty cost of approximately $70,300.00. Another
$4,000 was proposed to be paid by MSA funds as part of the South Coon Creek
DrIve Improvement.
The emergency outlet for the Red Oaks Manor North Pond Is proposed to be
constructed In conJ unctIon with Kensl ngton Estates 4th AddItion. Its'
estImated cost of $25,000 was proposed to be assessed to the benefIttIng
drainage area at approxImately $0.01/SF. Since thIs outlet also utIlizes a
part of the CrosstOdn Boul evard storm sewer, It may be reasonabl e to assess
a portIon of the CrosstOdn Boul evard cost to the Red Oaks Manor North
benefittIng area.
In concl uslon, we are re:Juestlng Council direction In regards to the
funding for the approximately $100,000 worth of trunk storm sewer benefIt
constructed, or proposed to be constructed, I n the CrosstOdn Boul avard/Red
Oaks Manor North area.
J
Jffi :adh
4-071 d'f
~o % CJ.,T'(
. ' ,
,.
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
H V.
~
J ,
,
t . fU(Vl ~ , -
g~ ~. H
~I _'1_ ~ J
= 'EVER(;R~EN
0_ _ ._;:_ _ _ _
t; \
~ I 6
6 eSTA ES
I ~~ - ' I
'j w ~ 6
~ r 1 '
J I I :
CC<l7ty Di/r:h M>. $1' I
",;;.r:il '-
, IlL ~
...... '
~' z j}~ 16' ~'
',J ~" · ,7.e1'./J.!..
10 "! '.1 ~ ' ,
/', ~L19 ~ JZ'~ ~'.
,. 11.) ,-.,. . JJ' "".
_ ' "..< ~/X II' r.. "
_ 'a~~ n. I
r I,' .
" ~ ~..-
- ~ )~.' . .
&'.' ~~ ~ ~K~~
~ ~;; ~_"\,, /. rl' ~"
~ 11(' ~. r I'
~ ~~ -7
~ '
~ ~! I '\ ~.
~~~! ~ ~I~~}\
~[\<X -r ~ ~T); >-
~.. :';~_~ _5;)'1'1"'1' ,.'~,.r ~..
~~" ~ .p~:;- ~"".. " ~
I ^ " ;<. IVJ - ~ IT" , J
--. ~ ir);z I.J:. ,-':"!:JL: "\... \' .. I---,
j, rJ;' , ";-- . -!.. /'(J. :U 'o..ci ,," -i- ...
_ '~j;[:.; ,. i-:- ~ ~p. ,."..t.;:ij . _
. ~b,>...~.. ~. I~ "t;,; ~~ [.,'" I.:!-
Jt ,. ~ ~ e ~,.....a.- ~ '
, . i:x " .li &: ~ T?'t--' I ;-- ~ N'14- I-;-
IJil "" '" ~ , / ~a,f..,,^k a I I--
: l'l IrH~T,I. '~~~. ir~~~.," :
,.;:. F-' ' ~ .....- "L- _ _ _ .
~ ". n\.' 'Jnr"- __
r'-- ~ -.c" \0 L.lm ~'" I
7,- ~ " ,.,,,~ ~
O -;- ~ n. 'YJ.- f-;- f-;-
~ "1(",. d .T;--.;- ~
~ HAV W I---
'\ . I..IN "I.. . D . '6"f.'" /'
c~ L. l., I
,
71
...
.I
"
.
; li~
I ; 1
I .
, 0 I
:c
I w: I
I ~,I
I
I ~ I
I .
I II
I U
----1-
.
I
I
I
I
I../::
: g;b
I ':j~
I .~
: I:" "
..,I'-
I x; I
: :1
"
:1
'I.-
- .-
I
I
I .,.
, ,~
--,=
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~ .
,-
"
'~
I
,
I
i
~~
..~~
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------,---_.,-
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
~
, ;\
,
,
. \
I
,
, I
, , I
,
, ,
, , : I
, ,
, I
, , I
,
, _IL
,
, . I
, , I
,
, ,
, , I
'- J I
I
I
I
I
I
~
,0
,,--=.
Regula. City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 21, 1989
Page 5
<Test Well, Continued)
In discussIons with the State Boa.d of Health, Mr. Davidson stated an
alternate to drilling a test well would be to test Andover School's
shal low well which Is across the street. That well Is about 270 to 300
feet deep. By securing the well log and ~estlng the quality of that
water. they can find out more about the quality of the water In that
layer. The cost for the testIng wIll be less than drII ling a test
well. And If the shallower aquIfer Is safe and they can get 600
gallons per minute from that It, It may be more cost effective to
drIll two shal lower wells and a tower than one deep well as an
alternative way of dealing with radium.
Mr. Davidson estImated it would cost about $3,000 to test the school
well. A test well may still be needed after the results are analyzed,
but It would only be $10,000 for a wel I that would be sealed off once
the testing has been done.
Mayor EI ling had a p.oblem goIng with two 300-foot wells for the City
water system. He preferred the $3.000 be used to put In a deep test
well that Is not potable than to test the shallow well at the school .
The Council and Engineers reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of
a shal low water source and discussed the best cou.se of action to take
at this time.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Pe.ry, that the Andover City Council
authorize TKDA to drill an approximately $10,000 nonpotable test well
on City property, to test fo. radium and other elements in the deep
aquifer level, and at the same time, authorize no more than $3,000 to
test the water at the Andover School for the same water quality; and
report back to the Council on the results as soon as they are
avaIlable. Motion carried unanimously.
RED OAKS MANOR/CROSSTOWN STORM DRAIN OUTLET
Mr. Rodebergreviewed the storm trunk storm sewer areas on both sides
of Crosstown Boulevard In the viCinity of South Coon Creek Drive.
Forty percent of the cost for the area to the west was paid for by the
county plus some MSA funds for the area applicable to South Coon Creek
Drive. However, the Council opted not to assess the remaining
portion, and they have brought it back to the Council for a final
resolution. If It were assessed. it would amount to 4 cents per
square foot.
\0
Mr. Rodeberg went on to review the storm sewer area east of Crosstown
Boulevard which includes Kensington Estates, the Red Oaks Pond, a
portion of Red Oaks Mano~ and a portion south of the landfill area.
, "!""':-.:;'
,", "":"',r,'. "');',:';-'"" '<',:r'.,'.:.;s;lP"
...":;~':..:'.: :",.,::
-. "T
;-.. :._'~r '.
,0
;
'---
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 21. 1989
Page 6
(Red Oaks Manor/Crosstown Storm Drain Outlet. Continued)
The pond is large enough to handle a 100-year storm as long as the
water gets down to its normal level between storms. They a~e looking
at constructing an outlet for that pond now as an emergency overflow
to get the water out between storms. He asked if the City wants to
assess the benefitted areas the cost of apprOXimately one cent per
square foot for the outlet.
Mayor Elling reported the two 40/s south of the landfill are going tax
delinquent. Also. the EPA Is proposing a 200-foot strip be taken from
the edge of the landfill for the expansion of the cap. allegedly
because of methane gas. That would mean a taking of one-half of the
pond plus 11 or 12 lots from Kensington Estates 4th Addition. That
proposal has.not yet been acted upon and he has not been able to get
any definite information from the EPA or PCA. Previously there was
extensive discussion on regrading and reshaping the cap on the
landfill to get the water to drain toward the creek.
Mayor Elling also stated he has written to the EPA requesting a formal
response as to what statutes they are operating from that would ailow
the taking of a 200-foot strip outside the landfill area. He has not
yet received a response.
JerrY Wlndschltl. developer of Kensinoton Estates - didn/t quarrel
with the engineering. The pond is a large area; and In the 25 years
he/s been in the area. he has never seen water any place except in
about 50 feet of the center. When the pond was originally done In
1975 by TKDA. It was delsnged to be a permanent pond for that area.
If there Is a risk. he felt it may be easier and less expensive to
berm the area where the water may get out.
Mr. Rodeberg stated the design Is for the area when it Is fully
developed. The additional cost for an outlet Is fairly minimal at
this time. It is not absolutely required except for safety purposes.
He didn't feel berming would be the answer because the lowest area of
the pond is in Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition.
:0
'---..
Mr. Windschltl - stated he has not been able to obtain any
Information regarding the taking of some of the lots around the
landfill. No one has come forward about the proposal and no one
appears to know what Is taking place. Also. there is no talk in any
of the documents about a methane gas Issue. None of his lots are even
close to the area, as the landfil I only encroaches onto the corner of
an outlot on his property. He questioned if there is any credibility
to the proposal. Mr. Windschltl went on to say that no one will tell
him exactly what is taking place. He has been lead to believe that
the SW 28 group has been behind this InItiative, but no one will say
why.
""k,.~':.,.:.>," >; , ,
>..:':l
. ..r.. .
,,"~:li'."~'
", ,'..:1 ,~r"7!'
," ; , . ~~I
'" ;'-w:~~:':.r'
c:> Regular CIty CouncIl MeetIng
\~ MInutes - March 21, 1989
Page 7
(Red Oaks Manor/Crosstown Storm DraIn Outlet, ContInued)
CouncIl dIscussIon wIth the engIneers was on the advantages of
outlettlng any pond and what the best course of actIon Is now.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, that we table thIs and make a
formal request for theIr (EPA's) IntentIons In wrItIng In regard to
the whole area assocIated wIth this pondlng. DISCUSSION:
Councllmember Knight clarIfIed thIs is regarding the easterly portIon
whIch abuts the landfIll. Mayor Elling noted he has already made a
wrItten request. Councllmember Orttel felt If the CIty Is goIng to
provIde draInage for the landfIll, they should have to buy theIr way
in. MotIon carried unanimously.
Discussion was then on the westerly storm sewer area. Mr. DavIdson
noted the previous CouncIl took the position of not assessing anything
in the area from 140th south along Crosstown Boulevard. The questIon
now is whether to assess for the City's portion of about $70,000 of
the storm sewer on the northern area or to defer that as well.
.,---.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by KnIght, that the CouncIl, based on
polIcy by precedent, not assess the storm water draInage system
adJacent to County State AId HIghway 18 proJect; the basis beIng the
precedent established from 140th Avenue south In the constructIon
area. DISCUSSION: Mr. DavIdson revIewed the county policy
regarding Its share of the cost. On the southern portIon, the County
paId $52,000 and the CIty pIcked up $28,000. South of Bunker Lake
Boulevard. the county paId a portion, and the CIty's portion came
from fundIng from the TIF distrIct in the IndustrIal park. Tryere is a
precedent of no assessments on county or State Aid streets. However,
thIs Is a unique situation.
Councilmember Jacobson felt It would be reasonable that there be no
assessments as long as the CIty is reImbursed from another entity. If
not, then there should be an assessment. Mr. Rodeberg stated the
CIty's share of the southern portIon is not being reImbursed. Mr.
Schrantz stated there is more than $70,000 In the MSA fund that can be
used In these cases. ThIs is monies that have been derIved from State
AId proJects but are not actual State AId funds. so they can be used
by the CIty for thIs purpose. After further dIscussIon, several
Councllmembers requested a delay to get more background on what took
place.
Councllmembers KnIght and Orttel WITHDREW the Second and the MotIon.
o
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, that we table the questIon of
the storm water easement along Crosstown Boulevard untIl the next
regularly scheduled meetIng to allow Staff to provIde CouncIl wIth the
background on the Issue: the county polIcy on reImbursements, the
ResolutIon that exempted, the area to the south of Crosstown, and any
other pertInent InformatIon that may be Important to thIs partIcular
area In dIscussion. Motion carried unanimously.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 27, 1989
Engineering
raOR
ITEM
NO.
Oak Wilt/Disease
Plan 2.
BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council requested Steve Kunde to prepare a proposal for
the Council to consider.
Ray Sowada has Dr. French and Jeanette Monear from Anoka County
Extension scheduled to come. We have already discussed the
problems we are looking for a proposal.
I recommend that we place this on a future work session when we
are prepared.
Attached is the information from May 2, 1989.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
j)~-r~
o
Regular City Council Meeting
May 2, 1989 - Minutes
Page 13
CURBSIDE RECYCLING
Dean Warden. Ace Solid Waste Manaaement - wants to Implement a
recyclIng p~og~am in Andove~. The intent would be to have the
residents put their newspapers in a grocery bag and put it in the
container. They would keep the newspaper separate and pIck them up.
The Council generally was in favor of Mr. Warden's suggestion,
offering to make the residents aware of the program through the
newsletter and cable TV. Also, the issue of reCYCling wili be
discussed in greater detail at a special meeting on May 18. It was
agreed to ask the haulers servIcing the City for their input at that
meeting as well.
No action further was taken at this time.
v' STEVE KUNDE/OAK WILT
Ray Sowada, Andover's Tree Inspector, asked the CouncIl to consIder
implementing a Diseased Tree Program in the City to protect the trees,
partIcularly from constructIon damage, and to clean up the existing
diseased trees. He introduced Steve Kunde who runs a consulting
forestry firm dealing wIth municipal shade tree programs.
Mr. Kunde briefly outlined the services he has provided other cities
wIth regard to their forestry programs. In working with Mr. Sowada,
he feels the city is at a stage where it needs a long-term plan for a
forestry program. It also needs a plan to deal wIth the Immediate
problems of oak wilt and the pine bark beatle. He outlined some of the
areas that would be Impacted by such a program and poInted out some of
ways they have successfully stopped the spread of oak wIlt.
The CouncIl was interested in establiShing such a program but felt it
could not be done at this time because of lack of fundIng. They
recommended Mr. Sowada make a recommendation at the tIme the 1990
budget is beIng considered. Mr. . Kunde was also asked to submit a
written proposal as to what servIces he would provIde and costs
Involved.
V RED OAKS MANOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Perry, the Resolution approving the
final plat of Red Oaks Manor 6th AdditIon as beIng developed by Norm
Holm and Art RaudIo In Section 34-32-24 as presented. (See ResolutIon
R082-89) Motion carrIed unanImously.
o
,.
i ~ :;JW
/J~t~_e.~ -r~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
May 2, 1989
DATE
ITEM
NO.
.
steve Kunde/Oak
Wilt
BY:
James E. Schrantz
FOR
AGENDA SECTION ,
NO. Statt, Comm~ttee,
Commission
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to consider a Diseased Tree program.
Ray and I met with Steve Kunde who is a graduate forester. He has
helped a number of cities develop long term tree disease programs.
He has recommended that the City of Andover set up a Tree Board to
look at Andover's diseased tree problems, seeing that Anoka County
has experienced such a high degree of Oak wilt and Dutch Elm
diseases.
.~
He also recommends that we have a woodland protection ordinance
that will discuss tree disease, construction damage, and a fee
schedule to help finance a disease prevention program. If the
City Council is interested in this type of program, it may serve
the City well to take proposals to discuss this with other people
that would offer the same service.
We possibly could look into working with other communities within
Anoka County. Currently, Mr. Kunde is working with the City of
Blaine. They will be flying the city to locate the oak wilt and
dutch elm and establish control areas. There may be areas in the
city that are out of control that we would not be able to prevent
further spread of the damage or the disease.
There are costs for this program, of course. I believe that the
funding for this program would have to be financed from some type
of a fee schedule. Maybe a fee schedule that's associated with
the improvement projects - if someone is platting land that there
be a fee where we would monitor the construction, monitor the tree
damage, help them with their construction methods so that they
[don't do damage to the trees, educate and inform them. Also, the
Council may want to set aside in next year's budget some part of
a mil in order to have funds to look at the disease problem in the
entire city. .
MOTION BY
'-- TO ~
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY .
~~~
Forestry
Consultants
METRO OFFICE:
2201 NORTH LEXINGTON AVE ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 488-7093.825-3272
NORTH OFFICE:
ROUTE 4. BOX 218 NORTH BRANCH, MINNESOTA 55056
April 27, 1989
City of Andover
Andover, MN
Dear Council Member,
The City of Andover is experiencing a rapid increase in tree
disease (primarily oak wilt) which is being fueled by the
development of oak forested property. This development is and
has been the driving force by which oak wilt has spread through
the Northern Suburbs. With a conscientious and well planned
forestry program the City can reduce the disease impact and begin
to develop an Urban Forest with increased health, value, and long
term growth.
The Kunde Co. would like to assist the City of Andover in
developing and establishing a comprehensive City Forestry
Program.
L
This type of program can be established over a number of years as
the city grows and develops. The City needs a long term plan to
be implemented over the next 5 years but also needs a short term
plan which directly deals with the complexities and increasing
spread of tree diseases.
The following represents a brief outline with explanation of a
few ideas which were recently discussed in a meeting with the
City Manager, and Mr. Ray Sowoda.
.:zhank ~, J
~ ,". r'j A'-
. t;v~~-d;'r.
o
-...
- -,
_. MFMRFR Millll0<nlo Fnr0slry A<sncbtioll - Sociely of American Foresters' Minnosola Society of Arboricullure - _. .
hltmnnticlIl:tl ~~H:I('ly 01 Arhorir'IIUtll'; . Amp-riCa!1 For(\;,lry Associa1ion
_.-
.." ,"
c9
{
",----
(()
LONG TERM PLAN
1. Establishment of Tree Board.
The establishment of a tree board is very important in
recommending to the Council the goals and direction a program
takes by gathering options and strategies through contacts with
professionals in various fields.
2. Assess the needs and impacts of the following.
Development -
Establish woodland protection ordinances.
Construction damage program.
Disease Control - Establish guidelines, ordinances, and
long term budget forecasts.
Reforestation -
Establish long term goals with respect
to specie selection, landscape requirements on
commercial property, and development of
planting plans on city property and parks.
Public Awareness -Establish a public awareness program to promote
the Forestry and Parks program.
1989
It is possible for the City of Andover to begin the planning,
process for a forestry program in 1989. However the opportunity
exists for the City to have a major impact on the future costs of
the program by implementing several aspects of it at this time.
1. Initiate mapping of existing infe~tion centers and any
control work accomplished. The Dept. of Natural Resources has
completed an initial mapping of major infection centers of oak
wilt within the City. This information should be obtained and
added to. Approximately 90% of future disease will occur within
old infection centers. This can substantially reduce inspection
costs.
2. Initiate tree disease control programs in development areas
which are currently going through the planning and development
process. The costs of control work is at least 10 times as
expensive and much more difficult to control once housing
appears. The development of 100 acres is dealt with at a
fraction of the cost of that with 100 separate residences.
~
L:
o
The initiation of this type of program can be contained within
the development costs with no cost to the City. Although this
requirement may cause some concern with the developer the overall
impact can result in increased speed of sales and reduction in
the developers liability. It should also be supplemented with
positive public relations from the economic development .
committee.
3. Initiate construction damage prevention guidelines. Builders
build~ng on wooded property would be required to follow basic
guidelines with respect to tree damage through building
practices. Again these guidelines and requirements would prove
beneficial in reducing disease spread and also reduce the
liability builders face when trees later die because of
construction damage.
These few suggestions represent a number of very important areas
in which the City could begin to implement a comprehensive
forestry program. They are not complete and must be added to as
time passes. Every Cities needs are different and the program
must reflect that cities character and growth characteristics.
Forestry
Consultants
METRO OFFICE:
2201 NORTH LEXINGTON AVE. ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 488-7093.825-3272
NORTH OFFICE:
ROUTE 4, BOX 218 NORTH BRANCH. MINNESOTA 55056
KUNDE co. CONSULTING FORESTERS
EDUCATION S. KUNDE D. FITZPATRICK S. COOK.
Bachlor of Science ~ College of Forestry - University of Minn.
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
Society of American Foresters
Minnesota Forestry Association
American Forestry Association
Minnesota State Shade Tree Advisory Committee
(Oak Wilt Subcomittee)
Minnesota Society of Arboriculture
International Society of Arboriculture
Municipal Arborists and Urban Foresters Society
PRESENT AND PAST CONSULTING CONTRACTS
L
University of Minnesota
Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources
Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture
Minnesota Dept. of Transportation
Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission
CDR Development Project
OSM Consulting Engineers
Minnesota Interstate Transmission Systems
Williams Pipeline
Forest Ridge South Development
.
CITY CONTRACTS
North Oaks
Burnsville
Wyoming
Tonka Bay
Lino Lakes
Circle Pines
Oakdale
North Branch
Forest Lake
Inver Grove Heights
Willernie
Mahtomedi
o
. ~.. .,. , MEMBER: Minnesota Foreslry Associolion - Sociely 01 American Foresters' Minnesota Society of Arboricullure
hllf!IIKII\()lldl ~i;...lI;i"ly 01 ArboncullUlo. Americarl rnmslry Association