Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 10, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING – JUNE 10, 2025 The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Loehlein on June 10, 2025, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Chairperson Nick Loehlein, Commissioners Roger Grout, Scott Hudson, Chuck Naughton, Jonathan Weinhold, and Ryan Winge. Commissioners absent: Commissioner Pat Shuman Jr. Also present: Community Development Director Joe Janish and Associate Planner Aidan Breen. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES – May 13, 2025, Regular Meeting Commissioner Naughton corrected the fact that “Jr.” should not follow his name. Motion. The Chair assumed a motion to approve the May 13, 2025, Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes as corrected. The motion carried on unanimous consent with Commissioner Winge voting Present. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a Front Yard Setback Variance – 13797 Jay Street NW, Randall & Sheryl Hubin (Applicants). CD Director Joe Janish reviewed the applicant's request for a variance to City Code 12-3- 5: Minimum District Requirements, specifically the variance to the minimum front yard setback. The subject property is located within the GB: General Business District, and City Code 12-3-5 establishes a minimum front yard setback of 40 feet. The table below compares the City Code requirements to the variance request. City Code Variance Request Difference Requirements Front Yard Setback 40 feet 24 feet -16 feet Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 2 The applicant is proposing a building addition that will be on the west side of the existing building, which is called the “front” for setback purposes, as that side is the shortest on a public street by 1.6 feet. The planned building expansion, while encroaching into the setback, will still be the same or further distance from the back of the curb from Jay Street’s curb as Walmart is from Jay Street’s curb. The following information was provided by the applicant: Curb Setback Comparisons Location Bldg. to Width of Sidewalk to Total Distance Sidewalk Sidewalk Curb Bldg. to Curb Walmart 30’5” 8’7” 2’4” 41’4” Applicant 24’7” 5’0” 12’6” 42’1” The applicant’s expanded building would be further from Jay Street NW curb line than the Walmart building. However, the applicant is requesting the same 41’4” requirement that Walmart has from the curb line to be applied to their expansion just in case there are any slight variations from the current plans to the final, build-ready, City-approved construction blueprints. Mr. Janish noted that the parking spots currently visible on the right, by Pizza Ranch, would become a drive lane as part of the expansion. All of the current grass, trees, shrubs, sidewalk, and other areas would remain, followed by the drive lane, and then the expanded edge of the building. Mr. Janish reviewed the review criteria from the applicant. Also provided for Commission consideration were drawings of the area, a draft resolution of approval, and a draft resolution of denial. This will come before the City Council on June 17, 2025. Commissioner Grout asked if the comparison of the setbacks is the front, and Mr. Janish stated they are comparing the Jay Street setback. The WalMart property complies. Commissioner Winge asked if Staff has done any evaluation on parking and is there a need for overflow parking. Mr. Janish stated that the applicant has come before the Economic Development Authority and did have a parking share agreement with STI. Commissioner Weinhold referred to the aerial photos and asked what is considered the front street setback for Pizza Ranch and Mr. Janish stated that would be Jay Street. The parameters of Jay Street have not changed. Chair Loehlein opened the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. Mr. Kris Thielen, Lino Lakes, the architect for the project, stated that working with City Staff, this is the best solution for the expansion. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 3 Commissioner Winge asked the applicant why this is the best location for the addition. Mr. Thielen stated that this plan makes the most sense. This layout provided the least impact on the layout and parking. Motion by Commissioner Hudson, seconded by Commissioner Naughton, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, 0-nays vote. Chair Loehlein closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Commissioner Weinhold referred to the Jay Street curvature. He recalls Jay Street being a “T” when Povs was there. He asked when Jay Street was extended. Mr. Janish stated he does not recall. Chair Loehlein stated this is a reasonable request for a variance and reasonable use of the property. Motion by Commissioner Hudson, seconded by Weinhold, to recommend the City Council approve a Resolution approving a Front Yard Setback Variance – 13797 Jay Street NW, Randall & Sheryl Hubin (Applicants). Motion carried on a 5-ayes, 1-nays (Grout) vote. Public Hearing: Consider a Sketch Plan for a master planned development, using a Planned Unit Development (PUD), on an 800-plus acre portion of the Rural Reserve, Artemis Development (Applicants). Mr. Janish reviewed Artemis Development Company LLC is proposing to develop 804.91 acres of the Rural Reserve. The applicant is proposing to use a master plan by utilizing a Planned Unit Development (PUD). This sketch review is the first step in a multi-step development process. Due to the size of the proposed development, a type of environmental review known as an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) is expected. The applicant is proposing approximately 1,370 units over the 804.91-acre property. When removing what is expected to be “water” and “green space,” the proposed density is approximately 4 units per acre. As part of Imagine 2050, the Met Council will require the City of Andover to develop at 3.5 units per acre as a base density within the existing Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The City has limitations in sewer capacity that may impact meeting the requirement of 3.5 units per acre within the MUSA; therefore, the rural reserve is the only location to make up the density to bring the base density to 3.5 units per acre. The applicant has expressed interest in having a lower density closer to 3.5 units per acre. Mr. Janish reviewed the Purpose of a PUD, what is a Sketch Plan, what is the Rural Reserve, what is an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), and what will be included in the AUAR. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 4 The applicant has indicated that the concept has been developed with the following criteria:  Existing surrounding land uses and street connections.  Existing natural features.  Existing soil conditions, including deep peat areas greater than 10 feet in depth.  Wetland delineation, including private and public ditches.  Preservation of Public Ditch 37 flow through, new water features, and water quality improvements.  Existing floodplain preservation. The applicant has indicated the expectation is to grade roughly the southern half of the development at first and construct 100 to 150 homes a year. The expectation is that the total build-out of the proposed development will be 10 to 15 years. Street improvements were reviewed and indicated on the sketch, showing connections to existing local streets that have been proposed to continue as part of future development. Three roundabouts will be constructed within the development. Additional access to thth Round Lake Boulevard will be constructed (157 Avenue NW & 154 Avenue NW). th Access at 149 and Round Lake Boulevard will also be provided. The applicant is proposing “parkways” that will consist of 100 or 80-foot right-of-way with possible medians in the middle. The applicant is proposing a 52’ right-of-way for Neighborhood roads. For the detached townhomes and three-story row homes, the applicant is proposing private drives. Currently, the City of Andover does not allow boulevard trees. The applicant proposes the use of boulevard trees and acknowledges that additional discussion is needed regarding benefits, concerns, short-term, and long-term maintenance responsibilities.  Benefits: o Reduction in traffic speeds. o Safer walking environment. o Create a pleasant walking environment that leads to neighbor interaction.  Concerns o Tree roots may cause curbs and sidewalks to buckle. o Tree trimming expense and concerns related to replacement. o Reduced effectiveness of street lighting, snow storage, street sign blockage, and potential for sight line issues at intersections. The sketch shows approximately 258.4 acres of active, passive, and nature preserve open spaces, representing 32% of the total proposal. Approximately 7 miles of trails connect the open space elements internally and externally. The PUD Sketch Plan provides a designated HOA Amenity Area of approximately 6 acres in size. This is expected to include a private (HOA) clubhouse and an aquatic center. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 5 The applicant intends to evaluate the use of native trees/shrubs, ground covers, and other native landscape materials in park and boulevard areas to lower maintenance expense and improve water quality. Currently, the City’s Master Park Plan does not include the Rural Reserve area and will need to be updated citywide to reflect the inclusion of this area. The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the concept on June 5, 2025. Comments received from the Park and Recreation Commission included:  The Master Park Plan will need to be updated to include this area.  Staffing impacts if the City accepted all of the park area, and the number of additional staff needed.  Questions related to the classification of park areas.  Comment on including trails that could access the commercial area.  If areas are open to the public to consider parking stalls for those park areas. Mr. Janish reviewed the proposed lot standards along with sample housing styles. The applicant is proposing approximately 30 acres of General Commercial to provide opportunities for office, retail, and services. The applicant would like to provide a Town Center type area to allow for a gathering spot for broader community events (i.e., farmer’s market; creating a historical tie to the current agricultural use of the property). The commercial area is expected to be the last portion of the plan to develop, as proposed homes and higher density around this area are needed in order to drive the investment for businesses to locate in this area. The development team is proposing to collaborate with City Staff in developing a conceptual plan for the commercial area. The following were reviewed: City Utilities  Water: As part of the AUAR, a comprehensive water study related to the municipal water system will need to be prepared to determine what type of water improvements are needed.  Sewer: A sanitary sewer trunk line would be constructed, extending from Crooked Lake Boulevard to this development. Private Utilities – Connexus Energy has indicated they will need to locate a substation within this property. They are currently having conversations with the applicant on the location for this substation. A substation requires a Conditional Use Permit and would be a separate review process from the development proposal tonight. Schools – The applicant spoke with the Anoka Hennepin School District #11 related to school needs in this area. The School District has indicated they are not expecting another school in the area currently. Wetlands/Floodplains/Stormwater – The sketch shows approximately 175.6 acres of ponding, waterway areas, floodplain, and wetlands, representing about 22% of the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 6 proposal. The applicant has been and is working with Coon Creek Watershed District related to these items along with water quality improvements. Mr. Janish reviewed the Met Council requirements. The next Comprehensive Plan will require an increase in density community-wide from 3 units per acre to 3.5 units per acre. This development is currently planned at 4 units per acre. Met Council indicated that with a planned density of 4 units per acre, this would bring Andover to 3.27 units per acre. Andover is still short of housing units within the existing MUSA and the proposed development area to achieve 3.5 units per acre./ The applicant held a Neighborhood Open House Meeting on April 2, 2025, at Bunker Hills Activity Center. The applicant mailed notices to those within 700 feet of the proposed development area. On this public hearing on this sketch plan City staff mailed notices to those within 700 feet (440 notices, non-duplicate owners). The Public Hearing notice was also placed in the official city newspaper and nine Public Hearing signs were placed around the proposed development area as well. Mr. Janish reviewed Staff Comments:  Continue to work through and review additional street connection points, internal and external to the proposed development.  Dead-end roads should be no greater than 500 feet in length.  A full park dedication study will need to be done, which includes the Rural Reserve to determine park space needs for development and park dedication fees.  Determine ownership and maintenance for sidewalks, trails, parkways, boulevard trees, and landscaping.  Storm siren coverage will need to be evaluated to determine if additional siren(s) are needed.  A Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required.  Environmental review will be required.  Work through the Met Council density. The Future Actions required if the applicant proceeds include:  Alternative Area Wide Review (AUAR).  Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development.  Preliminary Plat(s).  Final Plat(s). (City Council Action only). The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to conduct the public hearing for residents to provide comments and provide feedback to the applicant related to the proposed project. Also included for Commission consideration were Staff Review, Public Hearing Comments received, Slides Narrative, and Maps. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 7 Commissioner Naughton referred to the 7 miles of trails and asked how many miles of roads will be put in. Mr. Janish stated he does not have that number. Commissioner Naughton’s concern is snow plowing, etc. Mr. Berkowitz is expecting to add 1 additional park employee, 1 additional streets employee, and 1 additional utility employee. Commissioner Naughton asked if there would be an impact on the equipment also? Mr. Janish stated he believes some additional equipment would be needed. Commissioner Naughton asked if the current water treatment system would be sufficient. Mr. Janish stated that a water study would be needed. Commissioner Weinhold noted it appears the Met Council is requiring 3.5 units per acre. Mr. Janish stated that the Met Council gives permits for sewer line expansions, and they could say no more permits, which would cause urban development to stop. Commissioner Winge asked if the study is completed, and if the current capacity for water treatment is not sufficient, would the developers need to help pay for a new system? Mr. Janish noted water/water treatment would be covered in the AUAR. Commissioner Winge asked what the impact would be for the expansion of the sanitary sewer. Mr. Janish stated that the City has easements for the expansion of the sanitary sewer line, and this has been in the plans for some time. Mr. Janish stated that connection charges would be paid by the developer. Commissioner Winge stated there will be additional maintenance costs, and Mr. Janish stated there are three options for maintaining boulevard trees. Long-term maintenance will be further discussed with the applicant. Chair Loehlein noted that the purpose of the public hearing this evening is to receive public comments. Chair Loehlein opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Todd Stutz, Artemis Development, and Mr. Jake Walesch of Artemis Development, 10850 Old County Road 15, Plymouth, appeared as the applicant. They have been working on this development for 2 years. This is a unique development with 805 contiguous acres. Only 342 acres of the site will be developed with relatively low density. He reviewed the connections to existing roads. There will be a north-south parkway within the development. A ghost plat of the surrounding areas was also provided. They are suggesting a variety of housing types with a wide range of price points. They will focus primarily on local builders. Mr. Jake Walesch noted that the sewer will need to be brought to the site. 80% of those costs will be paid by the developer. The maintenance depends on what comes out of the park study. All the trails are proposed to be public. Maintenance of the trails will need further discussion with the City and County. This is a 10-15-year project. There is a $900M tax base for the City. The Commercial development will be done last. Commissioner Weinhold asked about the need for a substation and where that may be located. Mr. Walesch stated the power company has indicated a preferred location for a Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 8 substation, and it would be along alignment with the power lines on the south border, cutting across east to west. Commissioner Grout asked about connection to Andover Boulevard in the future. Mr. Stutz stated the right-of-way has not yet been determined. Commissioner Winge asked about the construction timeline and when construction would begin, and what the trucking situation would look like. Mr. Walesch stated that there have been several soil borings done, and the site will balance. This is a concept sketch plan. The environmental study will take 9 months. The Preliminary Plat should be presented next year. The property will be developed from south to north. Construction would begin in the spring of 2027, tentatively with the commencement of the grading. Commissioner Winge noted that in the comments the developer noted 80% of the sanitary sewer would be covered by the developer. Mr. Walesch stated the urban reserve is 1000 acres, and the developer of the remaining 20% acres would pay for their portion of the sanitary sewer. Mr. Janish reviewed the email comments received in writing before the meeting: From Address Terry McDonald 14459 Kerry Street NW Abby Kupka Not provided Michele Roskowiak Not provided th Daniel Kloek 3118 149 Lane NW Joe Churchich Not provided Mr. Mike Olson, 3052 153rd Avenue, asked if the final plat would encompass two different service roads. He has lived there for 30 years. His concern is the transition zone between the existing homes and the new homes. It appears the 50-foot-wide lots is high density to abut a rural neighborhood. He would like to see more screening/buffering in the project. He hopes the City hears the neighbors' concerns. rd Mr. Ken Seifert, 2987 153Avenue, stated that the major density will be in his backyard and there is no buffering offered. He believes the County will have an issue with the access road. th Mr. Brent Miller, 3140 149 Avenue NW, has lived there for 18 years. He supports the rights of the property owners to do with their property as they desire. He read the City Code regarding buffering needed, along with other sections of the Code. He does not see a transition or buffer. There is no mention of solar energy in the sketch plan. He reviewed the right-of-way at the north of his property. He asked where the 34 feet in the sketch plan is indicated. He is concerned about the impact this development will have on his right to move freely. Mr. Miller asked about the active/passive open areas. He is concerned about his water quality during and after the development. Another concern is the use of fertilizer by the new residents. Mr. Miller made many references to the sketch plan. He was planning to remodel his kitchen, but that is now on hold as they are not certain if they will Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 9 th remain in their home given this development. He is concerned about 149 Avenue th becoming an acceleration lane, and he would like to see a 25-mph speed on 149 Avenue. th Mr. Mike Parrish, 2975 149 Avenue NW, has a lot of the same concerns as Mr. Miller did. He asked about the status of the State Aid road. He has a drainage ditch on his property with his own pond at the end of his driveway. He asked if the developer would be speaking with current residents. rd Mr. Scott Hager, 3045 153 Avenue NW, noted that the transition needs to be taken into consideration. There will be 27 houses around his and two other properties. He would like larger lots in the development. Mr. Bill Leach, 15307 Verdin Street, asked if the land will continue to be farmed for the next 2 years. He asked about the farmer’s access road not being used for the past couple of years. He asked what the status of that road is and asked if property owners can extend their yards. Mr. Don Eveland, 2575 Andover Boulevard, is most concerned about the water runoff. There have been problems with water in the past. The City took care of the problem. He wants to make sure if problems occur in the future the City will take care of the problem. Ms. Mai Xiong, 15557 Round Lake, her property will be surrounded by Commercial on three sides. This makes no sense to her. She has considered moving. Her concerns are about the commercial development. nd Mr. Jason Huisheere, 3241 152 Lane NW, agrees with the previous comments made. He lives closer to the lake on the west side of Round Lake Blvd. He is concerned about air pollution during construction. He is also concerned about sound pollution during the 10 years of construction. He suggested area 5 and area 3 could be switched. st Mr. Dennis Picotte, 2978 151 Lane NW, lives in a cul-de-sac. His concern is he is 20 feet elevated above the field elevation. He showed a picture of the view out of the back of his house. After development is done he will only see rooftops unless there is a buffer of 50- foot trees. st Mr. William Corn, 3001 151 Lane NW, stated that if this is looked at conceptually, this plan is moving north to south, urban to rural, and west to east, urban to rural. This does not match the Comprehensive Plan and Code call for. The transition and buffering of 37 homes abutting 3 existing properties. The back of those new homes will be too close to the existing homes. He is concerned about the traffic and the addition of 8000+ vehicle trips a th day. 149 only has access to northbound Round Lake Blvd. There is a safety problem. Round Lake Blvd was just reconstructed last year. The Commercial property is shown as G1 and does not understand how that fits with the Comp Plan. There are no other Commercial sites in the area. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 10 rd Mr. Mike Olson, 3052 153 Avenue, noted that the City is trying to shift densities in the development from the Shift50 Met Council plan. To make up for a shortfall in densities in this area is a mistake. Ms. Mary Harrell, 14955 Ivywood Street, stated she is doubly impacted, as are some of her neighbors. The major thoroughfare will be behind her property. She has lived here for 30 years. This is very serious. At previous meetings she attended, it seemed everything had already been decided. The road behind her designation was to be changed. The designation rural reserve implies something other than what it was. There are many things to be considered. Ms. Lynette Bauers, 14570 Jonquil Street, lives in Creekridge Estates, is mostly concerned about the traffic. She has lived there for 38 years. She asked why the entrance to City Hall was moved. It was due to traffic. When she has her windows open, all she hears is noise. The Met Council does not live here, yet they have control. She is concerned about all the traffic on Round Lake Blvd. It is very dangerous. There are not sufficient bus drivers, and how will all these kids be picked up? Taxes will increase with the need for new schools. rd Mr. Matt Vorhees, 3122 153 Avenue NW, commented on the lack of space in their neighborhood. There will be 27 new homes abutting 3 properties. He referred to the Comprehensive Plan Goal 5 with policies on commercial nodes. #10 on the sketch plan conflicts with that goal. He asked that a commercial market study be done. th Ms. Laura Miller, 3140 149 Avenue NW, the boulevard will go through the front yard of their home. They were looking forward to retirement. Her husband built a workshop and a deck on their home. They love where they are and their view. She has emotions on this issue. She asked that the layout be flipped so that high density is not next to their property. th Mr. Jason Barnes, 2333 155 Lane NW, has lived in Andover for 13 years. He is concerned about how the math works out and asked about the requirement to hook up to City water and sewer. Can they remain Residential Reserve Lots? He suggested leaving more open space. He wants to leave as many of the large trees in place as natural buffers. He has well concerns and asked how that affects the depth of his well. He should not have to pay to drill deeper. The current schools are not adequate for this growth. The appeal of Andover is the residential reserve feel. st Mr. William Corn, 3001 151 Lane NW, referred to a workshop in 2024 with the Met Council to discuss density. At 3.5 density, that would be 175 fewer units. He hopes the plan does not change when moving to the north side. Chair Loehlein mentioned that no action will be taken this evening. Motion by Commissioner Hudson, seconded by Naughton, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, 0-nays vote. Chair Loehlein closed the public hearing at 9:05 p.m. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 11 Mr. Todd Stutz, Artemis Development, and Mr. Jake Walesch of Artemis Development, 10850 Old County Road 15, Plymouth, thanked all present who expressed their concerns and provided input. These comments were like those heard at the public open house. Mr. Stutz stated they are not prepared to answer every question asked this evening. He said an honest attempt was made to respect the existing homes regarding density. A change was made on the western portion of the property to match the existing development pattern. They will look at the buffers and density along the easterly property line. Mr. Walesch th referred to the right-of-way. They recognize that 149 Avenue is a 66-foot right-of-way. th They cannot comment on whether the functions of the road can fit on 149 Avenue. They will have further discussions with staff about the access connections. They are following the City’s plan regarding connections to existing roadways. He would not encourage anyone to extend their property on the farm access road. They are developing from the south to the north. They would be starting approximately in May of 2026. The land will continue to be farmed until construction begins. They will look at the buffer areas further. No conversations have been held with any property owners other than the 3 farmers. The water runoff is controlled by the ditches. There will be stormwater runoff systems installed, which will improve water quality. Mr. Walesch stated in area 5 that they will look at maintenance, buffer, and types of buildings. The AUAR study will include a traffic study component. The different access points will be looked at by that study. th Chair Loehlein referred to the discussion on 149 Avenue, and he sympathizes with residents, as this is the main exit in/out of this area. When Round Lake Blvd. was reconstructed, there was to be another designated entrance to the south. Mr. Janish stated that the access to the south has a significant flood plain, which is why the access was th moved to 149 Avenue for alignment. Mr. Janish also noted the AUAR will include a traffic study. Chair Loehlein asked about active/passive space versus park. Mr. Stutz noted that a portion is to remain a minimal maintenance natural area. The passive space will have trails. An active park may have equipment and programming as well as formal and informal play. This would be a public park. These areas are subject to change as far as labeling. They do not want to cause a maintenance problem for the HOA or the City. Mr. Walesch stated that the only private amenity would be the HOA amenity in #11 on the map (6 acres). Mr. Janish stated that the City has been working with the Met Council on density. There were work sessions that occurred relating to density. The Met Council wanted 4 units per acre. The City has been at 3.11 units per acre currently. Some communities do not support the 4 units per acre. Met Council dropped the density from 4 to 3.5 units per acre. The City had a policy that would be made up in the rural reserve. The Met Council indicated that with this development, Andover would be at 3.27 units per acre. Met Council is becoming strict with density requirements. The development needs to be at 4 units per acre. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – June 10, 2025 Page 12 Chair Loehlein asked if a market study would be required. Mr. Janish stated the City Council is hearing residents are looking for more Commercial areas in the City. Commissioner Weinhold stated there are more questions to be answered. He asked when the AUAR will be conducted. Mr. Janish stated this is a 9-month process and would be updated to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and a press release done. It will also be posted on the City website. Commissioner Winge stated that access to the development is of most importance with respect to the existing property owners. He urged the developer to take strong consideration of that along with the City. Traffic in and out will be a big concern. Commissioner Weinhold commented on Zone #5 and appreciated that the developer will take another look at that area. Chair Loehlein stated he appreciates the developer’s flexibility in being responsive to the neighbors’ requests. The environmental concerns (noise, air, water) plans should be addressed along with traffic. He appreciates the developer’s responsiveness. OTHER BUSINESS - NONE. ADJOURNMENT Chair Loehlein adjourned the meeting at 9:35 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Debbie Wolfe, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.