HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK November 28, 2006
o
~.\..~
. NDOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923. WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
City Council Workshop
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Conference Rooms A & B
1. Call to Order - 6:00 p.m.
2. Diseased Tree Removal/Sanitation Enforcement Policy - Engineering
3. Wayside Horns/Railroad Quiet Zones Update/06-10 -Engineering
o 4. Review of Bui1dablity Requirements - Planning & Engineering
5. Open Space Referendum Update
6.. 2007-2011 CIP Update
7. 2007 Budget Update
8. Other Business
9. Adjournment
Executive Session: City Administrator Review
o
cf)
o
cc:
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755.5100
FAX (763) 755.8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
City Council """ n
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator.~
David Berkowitz, City Engineer DtiS>
To:
From:
Kameron Kytonen, Natural Resources Technician
Subject:
Diseased Tree Removal/Sanitation Enforcement Policy - Engineering
Date:
November 28, 2006
INTRODUCTION
A draft policy has been put together to outline specific details on measures to be taken for
enforcement of diseased tree removal on private property.
o
DISCUSSION
Insect and disease problems, including oak wilt and Dutch elm disease (DED), continue to
kill many shade trees in the City of Andover. One big reason so many trees fall victim to
these respective diseases is because trees that should have been removed and properly treated
are left standing. Thus, proper and timely sanitation ofthe trees, which involves removal and
proper treatment of the wood, is critical in helping to prevent further spread.
The City's current diseased tree enforcement program takes actions to inform, educate and
provides enforcement of proper treatment of diseased trees to a limited degree. However, it
doesn't go as far as contracting for the removal of trees for property owners that fail to meet
specific deadlines.
This draft policy summarizes the recommended steps that should be taken for different
scenarios that occur in the field and includes sections on hiring a city contractor and
condemning trees for those that don't meet deadlines. The draft policy is presented to begin
discussion. It is anticipated that more information will be discussed at the January 2007 City
Council Workshop.
Staff will bring comments from the City Attorney's office to the meeting.
o
ACTION REQUESTED
It is requested that the City Council review the draft policy and direct staff on how to proceed
with implementation of the diseased tree enforcement program.
tfully s~--L-
Kameron Kyt~
Natural Resources Technician
, .~.
o
o
o
DRAFT
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755.5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
City of Andover
Diseased Tree Removal/Sanitation Enforcement Policy
Fall 2006
. j
DRAFT
o
Table of Contents
~
Section L General Policy Statement 3
Section II. Diseased Tree Enforcement Process 4
Section IlL Hiring City Contractor 6
Section IV. Condemnation Process 7
o
o
2
'f
DRAFT
o
Diseased Tree Enforcement Policy
Section I. General Policy Statement
The City of Andover is home to many specimen trees and woodlands of valuable trees
including but not limited to oak, maple, ash and pine. Each year, the future of these
resources is under increased pressure due to factors including development and insect and
disease problems.
Ibis policy outlines the strategies that will be used to ensure that diseased trees, those
that are considered public nuisances by the City, will be properly treated. Ibis will help
save more trees in the community and offset the effects of all insect and disease problems
in our urban and community forests.
o
Currently, oak wilt and Dutch elm disease are two diseases that have reaked havoc on
each species of trees respectively. Each year, hundreds of trees die from these aggressive
diseases. Because of the nature of how the diseases spread, proper sanitation of the
diseased trees is an important step in preventing further spread to healthy trees. In
general terms, sanitation refers to removing and properly treating the wood of the trees,
which can be done in one or more of many different ways.
Other insect and disease problems, such as the emerald ash borer (EAB), offer additional
long-term concerns. Ibis particular insect kills all species of ash trees and has killed
millions of ash trees in the Detroit area; it is threatening to move into Wisconsin and
Minnesota. If it arrives in Minnesota, it could be devastating to the state's ash trees
because there is a large population of ash and it's very difficult to control.
Thus, it's going to be critical for local units of government to put policies in place, which
work with property owners by increasing awareness of these current and potential threats
and are proactive in seeing that diseased trees are properly treated by established
deadlines.
o
3
, ~'
DRAFT
o
Diseased Tree Enforcement Policy
Section II. Diseased Tree Enforcement Process
Overview:
The following outlines the general process of how the Natural Resources Technician
(NRT) or designee will handle typical situations as a result of a positive diagnosis of
diseased trees on private properties in the City of Andover. The specific actions taken are
based on tree diseases that are considered through Andover City Code and State Law to
be public nuisances.
o
How Property Inspections of Diseased Trees are Initiated:
There are generally three different scenarios that trigger an initial property inspection.
They are:
1. A property owner (PO) requests the City to perform an inspection on their
own property;
2. A complaint is made from another source that requests the City to perform
an inspection on a given property; and
3. Diseased tree(s) noticed in field by the City.
General Enforcement Process:
A general process shall be followed based on how the first inspection was initiated.
Under each scenario that triggers the first inspection, a series of steps that are taken by
the City will be listed. Because of the nature of this, it is dynamic.
1. PO Requests Inspection on Their Property:
a. NRT or designee shall visit site and evaluate property; will consult with
PO and explain findings;
b. NRT or designee shall send Declaration of Nuisance (see "attachment 1")
to PO; and
c. Compliance check done by NRT or designee.
i. If found to be in compliance: no further action taken at this time
ii. If found to be out of compliance: refer to Section IV.
o
2. An Inspection on a Given Property Stemming From Complaint:
a. NRT or designee shall visit site and evaluate property first; will leave
notice (see "attachment 2") or send initial letter (see "attachment 3") to PO
if nuisance( s) detected;
i. CaD back (from PO):
1. NRT or designee will consult with PO and explain
fmdings;
4
. "
DRAFT
o
2. NRT or designee shall send Declaration of Nuisance to PO;
and
3. Compliance check done by NRT or designee
a. If found to be in compliance: no further action
taken at this time
b. If found to be out of compliance: refer to Section
IV.
11. No call back (from PO):
1. NRT or designee shall send second letter (see "attachment
4") and Declaration of Nuisance to PO; and
2. Compliance check done by NR T or designee
a. If found to be in compliance: . no further action
taken at this time
b. If found to be out of compliance: refer to Section
IV.
3. Diseased Trees Noticed in Field by the City:
a. NRT or designee shall follow all the same steps as scenario #2 above.
Additional details:
o
· "In compliance" refers to property owners who take all of the
measures listed in "attachment 6;"
· NRT or designee may mark diseased trees with tree marking
paint, ribbons, etc; and/or map them at any time;
· NRT or designee shall promptly notify potentially affected,
adjacent property owners of" disease existence in area (see
"attachment 5");
· NRT or designee will provide adequate literature including but
not limited to information on the disease(s) present, a list of
licensed Andover tree care companies and a handout on proper
disposal and treatment of diseased wood (see attachment 6");
· NRT or designee will send a reminder letter no later than January
15 to property owners who have diseased trees that are
considered public nuisances, which will indicate intentions to
inspect (perform compliance check);
· If NRT or designee encounters property where there are no
trespassing signs and/or is resistance from property owner, the
accompaniment of a sheriff will be requested prior to inspection;
· Standard compliance checks will begin no earlier than February
1 of each year and will go until all recorded properties have been
addressed;
· Special compliance checks will begin no earlier than the date on
the Declaration of Nuisance for that particular property
o
5
o
o
o
DRAFT
Diseased Tree Enforcement Policy
Section III. Hiring City Contractor
Each year, the City shall hire one contractor to perform removals and/or treatments of
trees considered by the City to be public. nuisances. This contractor will be utilized by
the City when property owners have failed to meet the deadline set forth in the
Declaration of Nuisance. Additional details on this are as follows:
1. The City will set up a bid opening, inviting all Andover licensed tree care
companies to submit sealed bids on removal and proper treatment of diseased
trees;
2. Interested contractors will put down what the charge will be per diameter inch of
tree (as measured 4.5 feet up from ground level) to perform the following:
a. Cutting down the tree and leaving the stump no higher than 2 inches above
the fInished grade;
b. Hauling away and properly treating all of the wood and brush
3. The City will formulate a formal contract with the hired contractor, which will
outline all of the pertinent details describing expectations, responsibilities,
timeframes, penalties, etc.; and
4. The length of the contract will be from February 2 to December 31 of each year.
There may be situations that have special circumstances. A situation involving a property
containing a large volume of diseased trees may be encountered. This may occur on land
of a large property owner, such as a fanner.
In these instances, the NRT or designee will decide whether or not it's feasible to use the
City contractor for the work. These cases may render the need to hire a logger or land-
clearing company to perform the work.
If this situation occurs, the NRT or designee will have the right to get at least two bids
from contractors of this sort and hire it out.
6
DRAFT
o
Diseased Tree Enforcement Policy
Section IV. Condemnation Process
For those property owners who fail to abate the public nuisance(s) noted on their
property, the City will follow thru by condemning the tree(s) involving the following
steps on a given property:
1. The NRT or designee will quantifY the number and sum up the total diameter of
all ofthe trees to be condemned;
2. The City contractor will be notified to review the property and will submit a
proposal to the City within the timeframe established under the contract;
3. The NRT or designee will provide written authorization to the City contractor to
perform the work;
4. Upon completion, the NRT or designee will evaluate the property to ensure
conformance to standards and pay the contractor for services provided; and
5. The NRT or designee will send a letter to the property owner summarizing the
charges to be paid.
o
Additional details:
· If the property owner fails to pay the City within the designated
time period, the City shall special assess the property owner.
o
7
o
o
o
DRAFT
(Attachment 1)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF ANDOVER
Declaration of Nuisance-Notice to Abate
City Code 4-3
THIS DECLARATION OF NUISANCE AND NOTICE TO ABATE is hereby made the_
day of . 2006, pursuant to Andover City Code 4-3.
You are hereby notified that the City of Andover has determined the existence of
(nuisance) at property located at
(address). According to records on file with the
City, you are the property owner. You are hereby ordered to. abate the nuisance by
undertaking the following corrective action:
Removina the (number of trees) marked tree(s) and leavina the stump(s)
no hiaher than two inches above the surroundina arade and properlv treatina the
wood (follow the directions on the attached "Proper DisposallTreatment of
. Diseased Wood" form).
This abatement action must be completed by , 2006.
Be advised that contractors used in the City of Andover shall be licensed by the City.
If you fail to complete the necessary abatement action by that time, the City may
undertake to abate the nuisance directly and may commence legal action against you to
. abate the nuisance. Pursuant to city ordinance, any costs incurred by the City in abating
the nuisance will be reported to the City Clerk as a cost to be levied as a special
assessment on the real estate taxes for this property.
Please understand that you have the right to appeal this nuisance declaration by
consulting with the City Council followed by filing a written appeal demand with the City
Clerk within ten (10) business days of the date hereof. Should you fail to do so, the
Order will become final. Please do not disregard this notice. Please contact the Natural
Resources Technician at 763-767-5137 if you have any questions.
Date:
Natural Resources Technician
o
Date:
Address:
Inspector:
(Attachment 2)
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
763-755-5100
www.ci.andover.mn.us
NOTICE
Upon a recent inspection, the City of Andover
Tree Inspector has observed the presence of one
or more of the following on your property:
o
D
D
D
D
D
Oak wilt
Dutch elm disease (DED)
Emerald ash borer (EAB)
Buckthorn
Other
Under Andover City Code and Minnesota Law, the
disease(s) listed are considered public nuisance(s),
which are required to be treated. Please contact the
City Inspector at 763-767-5137 within 10 days from
the date of this notice to discuss treatment options.
A formal Declaration of Nuisance describing minimum
treatment measures, deadlines, etc. along with
attachments are ensuing. Your cooperation is greatly
appreciated.
Notes
o
DRAFT
o
o
o
DRAFT
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755.5100
FAX (763) 755.8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
(Attachment 3)
Date
Owner/Occupant
Address
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Diseased Trees
Dear Property Owner:
This letter is to inform you that, based on a recent inspection, there is
(nuisance) located on your property. Under Andover City
Ordinance and Minnesota Law, trees infected with (nuisance) that are
not properly treated are considered a public nuisance, which property owners are
required to remedy. Therefore, steps must be taken to deal with the problem. A
copy of Andover City Code 4-3 is available on request and is also on the City's
website www.cLandover.mn.us
Attached is information on (nuisance), a list of licensed tree care
companies in the City of Andover and a handout on proper disposal and
treatment of diseased wood. If you contract the work out, the contractors used
must be licensed by the City. Please give me a call at 763-767-5137 within ten
days from the date of this letter to discuss treatment options. I would be happy to
offer advice or take questions or concerns you may have.
Please do not ignore this, as a follow up letter is likely. Your cooperation is
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Kameron Kytonen
Natural Resources Technician
KK:rja
Ene!.
o
o
o
DRAFT
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755.5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
(Attachment 4)
Date
Owner/Occupant
Address
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Diseased Trees
Dear Property Owner:
This is a follow up letter regarding the (nuisance) problem
at (address). Under Andover City Ordinance and Minnesota Law,
properties that have trees infected with (nuisance) that don't receive
adequate treatment are considered a public nuisance, which property owners are
required to remedy. Therefore, steps must be taken to deal with the problem. A copy of
Andover City Code 4-3 is available on request and is also on the City's website
www.cLandover.mn.us
There has been no record of any contact from you as requested from the first letter
dated (date). Please give me a call at 763-767-5137 within ten days from
the date of this letter to discuss the treatment options. I would be happy to offer advice
or take questions or concerns you may have.
See the attached Declaration of Nuisance ordering abatement of the
(nuisance). Please understand that if I do not hear from you, your
property will be re-inspected to verify adequate treatment of the
(nuisance). Should you fail to comply with the nuisance declaration,
the City may commence legal action to treat the (nuisance) and assess the
cost against your property.
Please contact me upon receipt of this letter. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Kameron Kytonen
Natural Resources Technician
}<K:rja
Encl.
DRAFT
o
(Attachment 5)
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
763-755-5100
www.ci.andover.mn.us
Date:
Address:
Inspector:
NOTICE
This is to make you aware that based upon a recent
inspection in your neighborhood, the City of Andover
Tree Inspector has observed the presence of one
or more of the following:
0 D Oak wilt
D
Dutch elm disease (DED)
D Emerald ash borer (EAB)
D Buckthorn
D . Other
There is a threat that the disease may spread to
your property. Under Andover City Code and Minnesota
Law, the disease(s) listed are considered public nuisance(s),
which are required to be treated. Please call the City
Tree inspector at 763-767-5137 for further discussion.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Notes
o
(Attachment 6)
DRAFT
o
PROPER DISPOSAL/TREATMENT
OF DISEASED WOOD
Diseased red oak wood, with bark intact, that is potentially spore-producing (pSPT) and diseased/dead elm or any elm
firewood with bark intact shall be properly treated to prevent overland spread of the disease per City Code and
Minnesota Law. This shall be done by one of the following ways: .
I. CHIPPING OR GRINDING: the chips are safe to use after for landscaping purposes, as they will not spread
the disease ifleft out in the open;
2. DEBARKING: if the wood is debarked, the oak wilt fungus cannot form fungal spore mats and the elm bark
beetles cannot complete their life cycle;
3. BURNING: this can be done any time of year, as it is an obvious choice for preventing overland spread; if
stored as firewood during the growing season, see below information;
4. PROPERLY COVERING AND SEALING: any wood that is stored with bark intact shall be covered and
sealed with a 4 to 6 mil heavy plastic tarp or sheeting; a black tarp will absorb heat the best, which will aid in
the drying process; the best way to do this is as follows (see diagram below):
a. Dig a 4-inch trench completely around the wood pile;
b. Cover the wood pile with a tarp or sheeting that is large enough to completely cover the pile;
c. Overlap the ends of the tarp or sheeting, so it extends beyond the trench;
d. Fill the trench with dirt to completely seal the wood pile.
If dirt cannot be used or a trench cannot be dug because the ground is frozen, too hard to dig, etc., the ends of
the tarp shall be weighted down completely on all edges.
o
Other Key Information:
~ The diseased wood does not need to be properly covered and sealed during the months of November thru
March;
~ Branches smaller than 2 inches do not need to be treated;
~ Generally, red oak trees that have died in the summer may be potentially spore-producing the following
spring and summer only; thus, the wood is only a hazard for one growing season;
~ Elms are hazardous until the bark falls off the wood, so their may be one or more growing seasons when the
wood is a hazard;
)> A hazardous wood pile that is properly covered and sealed may be uncovered and accessed (Le. to grab a
piece of firewood) as long as it is immediately covered back up and sealed to prevent disease spread.
Hazardous wood (stacked and seen underneath tarp or sheeting)
o
ing
Diagram of cross-section of
Dirt-ftlled trench
o
o
o
@
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
l.,..--
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Wayside HomslRailroad Quiet Zones Update/06-10 - Engineering
DATE: November 28,2006
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to review the cost estimates for constructing wayside horns at Andover
Boulevard NW and Crosstown Boulevard NW and direct staff on how to proceed with such
improvements. If acceptable by the City Council, the project will be included in the 2007-2011
Capital improvement Plan for construction in 2007.
DISCUSSION
The diagnostic team meeting was held on November 8, 2006 to detennine the improvements
required at Andover Boulevard NW and Crosstown Boulevard NW for wayside horns. The
diagnostic team included Robert Albritton (Railroad Controls Limited, RCL), Dave McKenzie
(SEH), Lynn Leibfried (BNSF/SantaFe), Rick VanWagner (MNDOT), Paul Comstock (Federal
Railroad Administration), Jane Rose (ACHD), Tom Hornsby (ACHD) and me. The team evaluated
the current conditions at each crossing and detennined the best location to place the wayside horns.
The ACHD has concerns about the distance from Andover Boulevard NW. They have stated that a
30 foot minimum distance is required from the edge of the travel way (edge of drive lane). This
location would make the horns much less effective. Staffwill continue to discuss this detail with the
ACHD.
RCL has provided a cost estimate (see attached price quote and proposed layout) for wayside horns
at Andover Boulevard NW and Crosstown Boulevard NW. Additional costs that are not identified in
the quote are interconnects between the Automated Horn System (AHS) and the railroad's crossing
warning system which is estimated by the railroad to be $5,000 to $15,000 for each crossing. Anoka
County Highway Department review and additional requirements (typically adds 10% to a project)
which would be $6,000 to $8,000 for the Andover Boulevard crossing, State Aid plan preparation is
estimated at $5,000 per crossing and staff time is estimated at $5,000 per crossing.
Total project cost for Andover Boulevard NW is estimated at $98,500.00 and the total project cost
for Crosstown Boulevard NW is estimated at $81,000.00.
o
o
o
Mayor and Council Members
November 28, 2006
Page 2 012
BUDGET IMP ACT
Funding options include Municipal State Aid funds, City's Road & Bridge fund or Capital
Equipment Note.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to review the cost estimates for constructing wayside horns at Andover
Boulevard NW and Crosstown Boulevard NW and direct staff on how to proceed with such
improvements. The current 2007-2011 Capital improvement Plan includes construction of the
improvements in 2007.
Respectfully submitted,
G)~cu.
David D. Berkowitz
,/ /
Attachment: RCL Quotes and Site Layouts
o
o
o
.~
Railroad Controls Limited
7471 Benbrook Parkway
Benbrook, TX 76126
Phone: 817-820-6300
Fax: 817-820-6340
Bill To:
Dave Berkowitz
City Engineer
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Quotation
Date: 11/20/2006
Quotation # 06.083
Customer ill
RCL Job No. A5608
Quotation valid until: 02/18/2007
Prepared by: Robert Albritton
Location: Andover, MN
RR: BNSF
Street
Andover Blvd
Dot No.
061578J
RR MilepOst
130.99
Comments or Special Instructions: Warranty period is one year from the in-service date for parts only.
Operations and maintenance training included
* This quotation is a budgetary estimate. The costs may vary if the posistion of the pole assemblies change
per county or railroad specifications.
** This quotation does not cover the cost of interconnection between the AHS and the railroad's crossing warning
system. This quotation does not cover any Railroad flagging costs.
Description Part Number Qty Unit Price AMOUNT
AHSMATERIAL
AHS Horn Assembly 07-000-016 2 $ 2,807.00 $ 5,614.00
AHS QZI - Double Face 07-000-017 2 $ 3,419.00 $ 6,838.00
Cabinet Assy, AHS Master 07-000-010 1 $ 11,632.00 $ 11,632.00
Cabinet Assy, AHS End of Line for 1 Horn 07-000-011 1 $ 6,015.00 $ 6,015.00
Cabinet Assy, AHS Vital Interface 07-000-012 1 $ 5,233.00 $ 5,233.00
Subtotal $ 35,332.00
INSTALLATION {estimate ouM
Material $ 6,092.15
Labor $ 7,637.90
Per Diem $ 1,540.00
Equipment $ 2,172.72
Contract Work (ElectricallBoring) $ 8,250.00
Subtotal $ 25,692.77
FREIGHT $ 4,348.66
*Applicable SaleslUse Tax is not included TOT AL* $ 65,373.44
"Payment due wlthm 60 days of mvolce
If you have any questions concerning this quotation contact Kurt Anderson
or Robert Albritton at (817) 820-6300 or email:abs@railroadcontrols.com
Thank you for considering Railroad Controls Limited!
o
o
o
I I
I ~
'fJ
q
q ~
c:
'" d
~ ~
0 ~
~ :t
~ ~
:Ii' 2:
~
sa
S?
j!!:
~
r-I.' ! m~'11 ~
I I .~
I I r---- ;
! ! I ~~
I I I" IIi:!
108 ~1ii
I I I!!! ... ill
I I I" ~
I I I
I I I
I I
I I
! : i
ANDOVER BLVD ! !:
-----------!'t ----------- --- r-n T -t- -----------ll! -------
I I I
I I:
I I 1
! I I: <i
~. ~ + --- ~-J--_rrr.~
~ J L-I8.5' ~ ,~~
18.~'- I I !ll~;
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
!
.
.
i 1111
- I
j~1!lE
ali'I'""",
I
~
-
$
~
lil
~ ~~ III
~~~ fl
g ~
M-"--::'" )::..)::.. ~
~ · <6 ~
00
~ <: OJOs:
"'~ ~;::;;;;1"T1
q <0 ~::o::o
fl ~~.
<~;~-
1'-
fl.
~f
!-<.
i~
I;
'iln
5l
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
l\l
~ 01
<O~
c..
.
o
o
o
.1Jg
Railroad Controls Limited
7471 Benbrook Parkway
Benbrook, TX 76126
Phone: 817-820-6300
Fax: 8l7-82~6340
BiD To:
Dave Berkowitz
City Engineer
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Quotation
Date: 11/20/2006
Quotation # 06.083
Customer ill
RCL Job No. A5607
Quotation valid until: 02118/2007
Prepared by: Robert Albritton
Location: Andover, MN
RR: BNSF
Street
~,Crosstown Blvd.
Dot No.
061580K
RR Mileoost
129.55
Comments or Spet:ial Instructions: Warranty period is one year from the in-service date for parts only.
Operations and maintenarice training included
* This quotation is a budgetary estimate. The costs may vary if the posistion of the pole assemblies change
per county or railroad specifications.
** This quotation does not cover the cost of interconnection between the AHS and the railroad's crossing warning
system. This quotation does not cover any Railroad flagging costs.
J.~~cription . Part Number Qty Unit Price AMOUNT
AHS MATERIAL
AHS Horn Assembly 07-000-016 2 $ 2,807.00 $ 5,614.00
AHS QZI - Double Face 07-000-017 1 $ 3,419.00 $ 3,419.00
Cabinet Assy, AHS Master 07-000-010 1 $ 11,632.00 $ 11,632.00
Cabinet Assy, AHS End of Line for 1 Horn 07-000-011 1 $ 6,015.00 $ 6,015.00
Cabinet Assy, AHS Vital Interface 07-O0~012 1 $ 5,233.00 $ 5,233.00
Subtotal $ 31,913.00
INSTALLATION {estimate onM
Material $ 3,212.01
Labor $ 7,637.90
Per Diem $ 1,540.00
Equipment $ 2,172.72
Contract Work (ElectricallBoring) $ 5,500.00
Subtotal $ 20,062.63
FREIGHT $ 3,758.02
*Applicable Sales/Use Tax is not included TOTAL* $ 55,733.65
**payment due wlthm 60 days of mvolce
If you bave any questions concerning this quotation contact Kurt Anderson
or Robert Albritton at (817) 820-6300 or email:abs@railroadcontrols.com
Thank you for considering Railroad Controls Limited!
o
o
o
I ~
\J
u
q ).
c::
t:l ~
~
... ).
(') a
~ :x:
~ ~
)> O!:
~
~
)>
...
~
i--;
lB.5'~ .
r--~~
I ~
I
I
I
I
~
~
12.-1
.I
;
j~~~
a)i:r-;o
-
s
~
o
0>
27'
I
I
; 2
!II
>c >c ;;j
~n~ ';
"'>cO'!:
~
....
.
III
~I
[
()~
:::0 ~
~O~
<::C/)[
0(1)
ttJO-:-l
~~o
~.?O ~
s:: OJ .
:2::r-
~!f"
f~'"
~r...
"m
,~
i~
N
~~
,,>0,
qUI
c
@
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
CC:
Mayor and Councilmembers "'" ~
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator ~ . A
Will Neumeister, Community Development Director lV~
Chris Vrchota, Associate PlannerP'
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Review of Buildability Requirements - Planning & Engineering
DATE:
November 28, 2006
o
INTRODUCTION
There continues to be a number of problems arising on properties where houses are built
close to the back of the required 100-foot buildable area. Especially problematic are
properties that abut wetlands or storm water ponds. There have also been some questions
raised about where the required 16.5 foot buffer area around wetlands and ponds is to be
measured from. Changes to three code sections are being suggested to address these
problems.
DISCUSSION
This item was brought before the Council at the August 22, 2006 workshop meeting.
After some discussion, the Council directed staff to check past minutes because they
believed that they had already dealt with this issue. After reviewing the minutes, staff
found that the Council had discussed this issue at a workshop on April 26, 2005. While
the minutes reflect discussion, they do not show the Council taking any formal action on
the subject. The minutes from both of these workshop meetings are attached.
The first proposed change is to section 11-3-6-B-l, which lays out the design standards
for lots served by municipal sanitary sewer. This section would be changed as follows:
1. Lots Served By Municipal Sanitary Sewer: Lots served by municipal sanitary
sewer shall remove all organic material and replace with granular material with no
more than five percent (5%) organic material by volume for the front one hundred
sixteen and one-half feet (116.5) flOO!j of depth of the lot at a minimum width of the
lot as required for that zoning district by the zoning ordinance.
This change would create an extra 16.5 feet of buildable space on all urban lots. This
space would allow for the easier placement of decks, patios, sheds, and additions on the
rear ofthe house, as well as creating more useable rear yard space.
o
The second change would be required if the first change were to be adopted. It would
change the buildability requirement mentioned in the definition for a "Buffer Strip" to
match the new 116.5-foot requirement, as shown below:
o
BUFFER STRIP: A one rod (16.5 feet or 5 meters) wide area abutting a wetland
and/or storm water pond that shall be left undisturbed or in its natural condition
during the development, building and landscaping phases. The buffer strip shall not
be included within the one hundred sixteen and one-half foot (116.5) fl-007
buildability requirement of Section 11-1-4 of this code, definition of "buildable lots".
The final proposed change is to section 13-6-5. This section establishes the requirement
for buffer strips and describes where they are to be located. There has been some
confusion about where the buffer strip should be measured from around storm water
ponds. The proposed change shown below is meant to remove any confusion:
Requirements: Buffer strips shall be established and maintained in accordance with
the following requirements:
1. . Buffer strips shall be identified within each lot by active protective fencing
approved by the city~ The developer shall be responsible for the placement of the
fencing. A one rod (16.5 feet or 5 meters, measured linear) wide undisturbed buffer
strip shall be maintained abutting all wetlands and/or storm water ponds during the
development and building phases. (Ord. 114A, 7-17-2001)
o
2. Buffer strips shall apply to all wetlands and/or storm water ponds. Buffer strips
shall be measured from the delineated wetland boundary around wetlands and
from the desienated normal water level elevation surroundine storm water.
sedimentation and/or rate control ponds as identified on the eradine. drainaee.
and erosion control plan for all new developments.
3. Baffer ski:tJs alHlttiag stann water }'londs shall be measured from the 100 year flood
eleyatian surrounding the storm water pond. .
Attachments
August 22, 2006 Council Workshop Minutes
April 26, 2006 Council Workshop Minutes
ACTION REOUESTED
The Council is asked to direct staff as to whether or not the proposed ordinance
amendments should move forward.
Respectfully submitted,
({!:::::-
o
o
o
o
Special Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes - August 22, 2006
Page 7
REVIEW OF BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND POTENTIAL CHANGES
City Engineer Berkowitz stated there continues to be a number of problems arising on properties
where houses are built close to the back ofthe required 100-foot buildable area. Especially
problematic are properties that abut wetlands or storm water ponds. There have also been some
questions raised about where the required 16.5 buffer area around wetlands and ponds is to be
measured from. Changes to three code sections are being suggested to address these problems.
He reviewed the changes and requested Council direct staff as to whether or not the proposed
ordinance amendments should move forward.
Councilmember Trude stated she thought they had already done this. City Engineer Berkowitz
responded staff would need to go back and do some research on this.
~
Councilmember Trude stated it was the Building Department that had addressed this previously.
Councilmember Jacobson asked how difficult it would be to put a deck in the 16 Yz feet. City
Engineer Berkowitz responded the footing would sit in muck and eventually pull away.
Councilmember Trude stated the new number 3 needs to say the new homeowners need to
respect the buffer. City Engineer Berkowitz stated ifthey make this a City Ordinance, it would
be enforceable. He stated they would come back with the dimensions ofthe buffer and the
signage recommended.
Mayor Gamache recommended they hold off on this until after the NPDES study.
Councilmember Orttel requested staff go through the past minutes to see if they had addressed
this in the past.
Councilmember Trude suggested they add a number 3 for a permanent buffer.
Mayor Gamache stated they should tie this into the study if possible.
OPTION FOR BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD MEDIAN MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED)
Community Development Director Neumeister stated at the July 25, 2006 Council Workshop the
discussion item was first introduced. Since that time, staffhas thought about other options
available and want to get more input from the Council on what direction to pursue. He reviewed
the seven options that could be considered as to what can be done with the median on Bunker.
He indicated staff is looking for direction on whether there is anyone option that has more
appeal than any of the others on the list. The Andover Station Owners Association is still
interested in moving toward lowering their annual operating costs.
0,
)
. Special Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes - April 26, 2005
Page 11
DISCUSSION ON BUILDABILITY REQUIREMENTS
0'
Mr. Newneister stated there was a review of this six or seven years ago. About two years ago a
section of the ordinance changed to indicate the 16-~ foot buffer strip should not be within the
100-foot buildable area, but in addition to it. The Public Works Department felt it was tough to
maintain wetlands with this change and the Building Department stated it was difficult to site
decks. He showed a diagram of a home with only 80 feet of buildable space. The homeowner
could hardly get a deck on the site. In Sophie's Manor, the City knew the development was set
tightly between two wetlands. There was only between 105 and108 feet of buildable space due
to wetland mitigation.
City Administrator Dickinson asked if staff should research this problem and require more
buildable area Councilmember Orttel stated the market determines this kind of thing.
-j
Councilmember Jacobson stated the City should stamp plans not suitable for decks or require a
deck if a patio door is installed.
Mr. Newneister stated many times when a resident wants to put in a patio slab, deck or pool the
slope creates drainage problems. Landscaping changes the site.
Councilmember Trude asked if a 30-foot backyard setback would take care of the issue. Mr.
Newneister stated it would be great since there needs to be more buildable area. Mr. Dickinson
stated this would eliminate ramblers.
CounciImember Trude stated there also is the issue of filling in drainage areas.
Mr. Dickinson stated before staff does further research, there needs to be true consensus on
where the Council wants staff to go with this issue. Should this be limited to ball field fences
and not park benches?
Council could consider doing it just at Sunshine Park to see if it works. It could always be
stopped if it is not successful. CounciImember Trude stated she was opposed to this at Sunshine
Park because of aesthetics and it being such an open park.
Staff could research the issue and see what types of agreements are being used. If the program is
unsuccessful it could be discontinued.
,
/
Staff could do a survey of interest in advertisements in Sunshine Park during the business
appreciation event.
o
o
c
o
@)
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
Mayor and Council Members
FROM:
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT:
Open Space Referendum Discussion
DATE:
November 28 2006
INTRODUCTION
On November 7th the Andover voters approved the approved the "Preservation of Water, Wildlife, and
Natural Habitat Areas" ballot question. With this approval the City council has the ability to levy taxes to
meet what was identified in the approved ballot question below: .
"Shall the City of Andover, Minnesota, be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds in an
amount not to exceed $2,000,000 to finance the acquisition of land from willing sellers for the
preservation of natural areas, water and air quality and wildlife habitat? Spending would be
subject to an annual audit."
DISCUSSION
To assist in making the next steps I anticipate that the City will utilize a number of resources along the way
such as the Trust For Public Land, DNR and the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District to
prepare for the purchase or preservation process. It is also anticipated that the City Council will want to
start the process of interviewing individuals to serve on a City of Andover established commission to assist
the Council. Council concurrence is sought here.
Also attached to this report are materials gathered from Washington County that focuses on their purchase
of development rights program. Washington County has spent a considerable amount of resources on
preparing for their referendum, and I thought they would be a good source of data as Andover prepares to
move forward.
ACTION REOUESTED
The Council is requested to discuss the timing of the implementation of the ballot question and identify
concerns or desires the Council may have as the implementation proceeds.
Washington County, :MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 1 of 11
~
Your County
Government Links
County Mission
Advisory Boards
Committee
Vacancies
County Calendar
Performance
Measurement - 2005
Residential Survey
Results - 2006
Land Protection
Funding
Referendum
- PDR Intra -
Purchase of Dev
Rights
o
f(
o
Purchase of Development Rights Program
Policy and Procedures Document
. Purchase of Development Rights - Ordinance 144
. Green Corridor Opportunity Areas Map (PDF)
. PDR Criteria Worksheet
. PDR Site Evaluation Criteria
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND AUTHORIZATION
The following program guidelines describe the policies and procedure that will be used to
implement the Washington County Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) Program, as
authorized by the Washington County Purchase of Development Rights Ordinance.
(Ord. 144)
The purpose of the PDR Program is to preserve open space, including natural and scenic
areas and productive agricultural land, through the purchase of development rights from
voluntary applicants. Through a PDR Program, private landowners can receive
compensation for their role in providing open space protection while continuing to use
their land. The fee title to these lands remains in private ownership.
\
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this Program, certain words and phrases are defined as follows:
(1) Agricultural Land: Land whose use is devoted to the production of crops, livestock, and
vegetables, as well as to dairy, poultry and horticultural products, equestrian activities and
alternative products of the land.
(2) Conservation Easement: A non possessory interest of a holder in real property
imposing limitations or affirmative obligations the purposes of which include retaining or
protecting natural, scenic, or open-space values of real property, assuring its availability
for agricultural, forest, recreational, or open-space use, protecting natural resources,
maintaining or enhancing air or water quality, or preserving the historical, architectural,
archaeological, or cultural aspects of real property. (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 84C.)
(3) Corridor: Protected areas of open Space linked together throughout the community.
(4) County Board: The Washington County Board of Commissioners.
(5) Development: An activity which materially alters or affects the existing conditions or
use of any land.
(6) Development Riahts: An interest in and the right to use and subdivide land for any and
all residential, commercial and Industrial purposes and activities which are not incident to
agriculture and open space.
(7) Eligible Land: Properties for which the purchase of development rights is authorized
~
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~ovemment_1inks/land--protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 2 of 11
o
pursuant to the Purchase of Development Rights Ordinance.
(8) Open Space: Land used for agriculture, natural habitat, pedestrian and/or scenic
views, that is undivided and permanently protected from future development.
(9) Resource Values: The values that a conservation easement is intended to protect, as
defined and recorded in the baseline documentation. Values may include but are not
limited to natural habitat, productive agricultural land, scenic views and connections to or
extensions of existing parks or protected open space.
(10) Selection Round: A cycle of the Purchase of Development Rights Program, from initial
advertisement of the program through completion of offers to purchase development
rights conservation easements.
SECTION 3. SCOPE AND COVERAGE OF THE PROGRAM
Through a series of public forums and other meetings facilitated by the Green Corridor
Project, Washington County residents and public officials were able to express their
opinions on the high value natural resource areas in the County. The results of the public
input, as well as extensive analysis and mapping of natural areas in Washington County,
are presented on the map Green Corridor Opportunity Areas, Attachment 1 (PDF)
The resources that form the Opportunity Areas include high quality agricultural land,
natural habitat land, and scenic areas; environmentally sensitive areas; and connections
between open space areas.
o
Specific criteria that were used to define the Washington County Opportunity Areas
include:
. high quality soils
. MN County Biological Survey sites and areas
. large blocks of contiguous agricultural land
. Iflrge blocks of contiguous natural habitat
. presence of vegetated stream corridors
. trout streams
. undeveloped lake shore
. presence of erosion prone soils
. ground water sensitivity
. scenic areas valued by County residents
. grasslands
. forest interior
SECTION 4. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The administration of the PDR program involves the County Board of Commissioners, a
PDR Advisory Committee, and County staff. The administrative roles and responsibilities of
each of these groups are outlined below.
o
County Board of Commissioners
The County Board of Commissioners is the policy-making body for the County. The County
Board originates the PDR Program through ordinance and has oversight authority for the
Program. Other responsibilities include:
Q)
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/land....protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 3 of 11
o
. Overseeing program administration
. Approving program rules
. Appointing PDR Advisory Committee members
. Establishing yearly funding levels
. Establishing the 'split' between the countywide program and any matching grants to
local governments
. Directing appraisals or valuations of easements
. Approving easement purchases
. Awarding matching grants
. Approving financing mechanisms and accepting grants
Program Staff
County staff will administer the PDR program on a day-to-day basis. Staff will provide
support to the PDR Advisory Committee and County Board. The capabilities of staff could
include, program administration, planning, and resource management. Additionally, it is
desirable for staff to have knowledge of land conservation programs and financing, and
knowledge of agriculture and ecology.
o
. In addition to staff assigned directly to the PDR Program, support will be needed
from the following County staff:
. Attorney's Office - review of easement language
. Assessment, Taxpayer Services and Elections Department - appraisals/easement
value
. Recorder's Office - ensuring easements are recorded
. Transportation and Physical Development Department - land use and land
management
. Public Health Department - groundwater and surface water issues
. Real Estate Acquisition Committee - review of recommended easement purchases
The speCific responsibilities of PDR Program staff will include:
o
. Creating and distributing materials to promote the program
. Overall administration of program and financial management
. Soliciting applications - advertising, publicity
. Advising applicants and potential applicants
. Initial screening of applications for eligibility
. Initial evaluation of eligible parcels according to criteria; preparation of reports to
Advisory Committee
. Negotiations with landowners of eligible parcels - easement prices, bargain sales,
additional development sites, etc.
. Determining easement value
. Soliciting comments from local governments, watershed associations, etc.
. Support to Advisory Committee -- mailings, meeting coordination, minutes, etc.
. Seeking County Board approval of the recommended easement purchases
. Assisting the Minnesota Land Trust in negotiating conditions of easement with
landowners and oversight of the Minnesota Land Trust as easement holder and
monitor, if chosen to assist the County with these duties
. Environmental risk analysis (due diligence)
. Ensuring that easements are recorded
. Ensuring that subdivisions or plats clearly identify parcels on which development
rights have been sold and extinguished
. Seeking additional outside funding
PDR Advisory Committee
8>
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/land....protectionjun...l1/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 4 of 11
o
The County will use an expended Parks and Open Space Commission as its PDR Advisory
Committee. A liaison from the Planning Advisory Commission will be added. Additional
members may be added to achieve representation fro,m the following interests:
(1) farmers;
(2) landowners;
(3) local units of governments, including but not limited to cities, towns, and water
management organizations;
(4) citizens at large with knowledge or experience related to the purpose of the program;
(5) conservation organizations;
(6) residents of each County Commissioner's district;
(7) a Soil and Water Conservation District Board member; and
(8) a member of the Washington County Board of Commissioners.
~.
Each member may represent one or more of the above interest groups.
The Advisory Committee will also include non-voting technical advisory members from
agencies involved in land and water protection activities, such as the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Department of
Natural Resources.
The Advisory Committee shall be appointed to staggered three-year terms. The initial
members shall be appointed to one-year, two-year and three-year terms so that no more
than five members' terms expire in one year. Each member may serve a maximum of two
consecutive three-year terms.
o
y
. Make recommendations to the County Board regarding selection criteria;
. Review applications that meet the initial eligibility criteria;
. Visit and evaluate sites based on "Phase 2" criteria as outlined in Section 5 of this
document;
. Evaluate applications based on available funding and potential for bargain sale or
additional funding;
. Review comments from local units of governments and watershed management
organizations;
. Recommend parcels to County Board for purchase of Conservation Easements;
. Assist in seeking funding opportunities; and
. Provide input to County on all program activities.
The PDR Advisory Committee is assigned the following duties and responsibilities:
SECTION 5. ELIGIBILITY AND PRIORITIES
The following criteria shall be considered in determining which offers to consider in any
Selection Round.
Initial Eligibility
Threshold eligibility requirements for the PDR Program define which landowners can
submit applications to sell their development rights. All of the following factors must be
present for a property to be considered for purchase of development rights:
o
(1) A voluntary application is submitted by the property owner;
(2) The property is included within the Green Corridor Opportunity Area;
(3) The minimum parcel size corresponds to the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning
~
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_1inks/land....protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 5 of 11
o
district, except in cases where it can be demonstrated that the parcel fills a significant gap
between, or is adjacent to, other protected high-value resources or open space; and
(4) The parcel must have some development rights remaining under current zoning.
Parcels that have been developed to the maximum allowed under density-based zoning
are not eligible. Preferences will be given to parcels that have the ability to serve multiple
public purposes, such as storm water management, recreation, etc. (to be determined by
field survey, comments from local government units and additional research), and are
adjacent to waterways, bike trails, County parks and other public facilities.
Phase I Ranking Criteria
The following criteria are recommended to be used for the Phase I Ranking of applications.
At the start of a Selection Round, point values will be assigned to each criterion on the
PDR Criteria Worksheet contained in Attachment 2 of this document. The point
values contained in Attachment 2 are recommended, however, they may be modified by
resolution of the County Board prior to each Selection Round. (See attached for Year
2000 Pilot Program Site Evaluation Criteria adopted by County Board
Resolution.)
Natural Resource Values
o
(A) Within areas of substantial forest interior, as defined on "Forest Interior Criteria
Layer," Green Corridor Project map.
(B) Frontage along a lake, river or stream, as defined in the Department of Natural
Resources Protected Waters Inventory.
(C) County Biological Survey site or area, as defined in the Department of Natural
Resources Minnesota County Biological Survey for Washington County.
(D) Presence of erosion-prone soils and steep slopes, as defined in the Washington County
Soil Survey.
Agricultural Values
(A) Within large blocks of active agriculture, as defined on "Large Blocks of Agriculture
Criteria Layer," Green Corridor Project map.
(B) Prime or significant farmland soils, as defined in the Washington County Soil Survey.
(C) Enrollment in Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves or Green Acres programs.
(D) Historic farmstead or landmark as defined in the National or State Historic Register of
Sites or the Washington County History Network Historic Site Inventory.
Spatial Values
(A) Proximity to parks or other protected Open Space (adjacent to or within V2 mile).
(B) Application size of 80 acres or more (could include multiple contiguous parcels under
single ownership).
(C) Public access provided (enhancing existing recreational opportunities receive greater
points).
(D) Presence in a corridor designated scenic by congressional or state legislative action, by
local unit of government resolution, or some other formal method (existing corridors
include St. Croix RiverWay and County Road 21).
(E) Planned for municipal sewer service (a negative point value).
o
Planning and Zoning Considerations
(A) Comprehensive plan designation for agriculture, resource protection or an equivalent
@'
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infoJorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/land_J)rotectionJun...ll/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 6 of 11
o
designation.
(B) Zoning densities of 1 unit per 10 acres or lower (densities receive greater point
values).
Phase 2 and Site Visit Ranking Criteria
The following criteria shall be considered for use in conjunction with site visits, to
determine final ranking of parcels recommended for conservation easement purchase.
Point values will be established by resolution of the County Board prior to each Selection
Round.
(1) Additional natural values, based on field survey.
(2) Additional scenic or historic values, based on field survey and research.
Factors such as the willingness of the landowner to offer a bargain sale, opportunities for
leveraging additional funding, or multiple applications from the same general area, will be
considered in developing a list of "Recommended Parcels".
SECTION 6. APPLICATION AND SELECTION PROCESS
o
Each PDR Program Selection Round will have an application and selection process
conducted by County staff, a PDR Advisory Committee, and the County Board of
Commissioners. The purpose of this process is to prioritize parcels among the applications.
The application and selection process is illustrated in the Selection Round Flow Chart,
Attachment 3. (PDF)
Acceptance of Applications.
County staff will accept applications during a set period within a Selection Round.
Applications are intended to indicate an interest in participating in the Program, and do
not represent a binding commitment or offer to sell a conservation easement.
Screening and Phase 1 Ranking of Applications.
County staff will screen applications for eligibility and rank the eligible parcels using the
criteria in Section 5, Eligibility and Priorities. This Phase 1 ranking will result in a list of
"Candidate Parcels" that are ranked in order of relative priority. County staff will solicit
comments on all "Candidate Parcels" from the applicable local units of government and
water management organizations.
Site Visits and Phase 2 Ranking of Candidate Parcels.
County staff will coordinate site visits by the PDR Advisory Committee for all "Candidate
Parcels". The PDR Advisory Committee will rerank the "Candidate Parcels" using the Phase
2 - Site Visit Criteria listed in Section 5 and the local unit of government comments. This
Phase 2 Ranking will result in a list of "Recommended Parcels" that will be submitted to
the County Board for review and approval to pursue conservation easement valuations.
o
Real Estate Acquisition Committee Review.
The Washington County Real Restate Acquisition Committee reviews parcels of land that
the County is considering for purchase. It screens for such things as unpaid takes, survey
problems, pollution concerns, abandoned wells, and title problems. This Committee will
review each parcel on the "Recommended Purchases" list prior to purchase offers being
made to landowners. Major problems that are uncovered will be brought to the attention
of the County Board prior to making an offer to purchase development rights.
Q)
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/land-protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 7 of 11
Q
Conservation Easement Valuations and Negotiation.
(1) Conservation Easement valuations will be conducted as described in Section 7. An
agent of the County will negotiate price and conservation easement terms with
landowners. Landowners may make offers to sell at a price lower than the conservation
easement value (bargain sale) during this period.
(2) Based on conservation easement values, bargain sale offers, availability of additional
funding for specific purchases, comments from local government units, and other factors,
the PDR Advisory Committee will prepare a prioritized list of "Recommended Purchases"
for approval by the County Board.
(3) The County Board may accept the list of "Recommended Purchases" or modify the list
by removing sites or adding any sites from the list of "Candidate Parcels." The County
Board will approve the purchase of conservation easements based upon available funding.
Those not funded will be placed on a waiting list.
Offers to Purchase.
Upon County Board approval, offers to purchase conservation easements will be tendered
to the landowner. Based on negotiations with the landowner and other factors, an offer
may specify terms, contingencies and conditions not contained in the original application,
but only after approval by the County Board. A period will be established within which
landowners may accept or reject offers to purchase. If an offer is rejected, funds will be
reallocated to the next available parcel on the waiting list.
o
Closing and Payment.
Settlement will occur following the landowner's acceptance of the County's offer to
purchase a conservation easement, and is contingent upon due diligence, environmental
audit, a title search, mortgagee's consent to the conservation easement, and any other
evidence that may be necessary to clear title. Payment terms may be by lump sum, by
installments, or by other arrangements satisfactory to both parties.
Recording and Monitoring.
The County's acquisition of a conservation easement shall be recorded in the County
Recorder's Office. Monitoring will be conducted as specified in Section 9.
SECTION 7. VALUATION AND PAYMENT METHODS
o
A. Valuation of Easement Cost
At the beginning of each Selection Round, Washington County will choose a valuation
method for determining the cost of purchasing development rights easements. One
method for establishing the value of the development rights is through a parcel-specific
appraisal. Under the appraisal method, a certified appraiser is chosen by the County to
establish the value of the development rights in a before/after appraisal process. The
appraiser first evaluates the fair market value of the unrestricted property before
development rights are sold, then the appraiser establishes the restricted value of the property
based upon the agricultural or conservation activities that could occur on the property under the
terms of the conservation easement. The difference between the unrestricted value and the
restricted value is the value of the development rights. The appraisal method is highly
justifiable since each parcel is examined in detail. The method is, however, costly and
time-consuming.
The County may choose to use an alternative method of establishing value. For example,
@)
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnmenUinks/land....protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 8 of 11
c
a set price per development right purchased could be established. The set price could vary
according to zoning classification. The set price would be established based on a set of
actual or sample appraisals and/or on assessors' data. This method would be less costly
and take less time.
Landowner Appraisals.
Whatever method is used, landowners may obtain their own appraisal at their own
expense from a qualified appraiser for purposes of comparison and negotiation, and/or for
the purpose of calculating tax benefits.
B. Payment Methods
Payments to landowners for purchase of development rights may be made in one lump
sum or through installment payments. The use of installment payments may allow the
Program to protect more parcels sooner. Installments could be for periods of 10, 15, 20 or
30 years. The landowner would receive tax-free payments of interest only each year and a
balloon payment at the end of the term. The installment payment contract could be sold to
local brokerage firms after an initial restricted period if landowners wish to "cash out." An
installment contract also may enable landowners to defer capital gains taxes. By financing
installment sales with the purchase of zero-coupon bonds, the County could increase the
amount of land protected each year by a factor of as much as 6 or 7.
SECTION B. NATURE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT RESTRICTIONS
G
A. General Conditions
The restrictions placed on parcels on which development rights are sold are in the form of
a conservation easement. A conservation easement is a written agreement that separates
the right to develop the parcel from the fee title to the parcel.
The terms of the conservation easement will be negotiated with each landowner and will
be based on the resources demonstrated .in the application and through the criteria
ranking process. The terms of the easements may vary from parcel to parcel. At a
minimum, residential development and non-agricultural commercial and industrial
development will be prohibited on land covered by the easement. Additional easement
terms that may be negotiated, include, but are not limited to:
. requiring the preparation of a conservation plan according to National Resources
Conservation Service standards for agricultural land;
. requiring the preparation of a forest stewardship plan;
. allowing additional farm buildings; or
. allowing remodeling, replacement or enlargement of existing buildings up to a
specified percentage increase in size of buildings.
B. Prohibited Uses of Land.
The following land uses shall be prohibited on lands under a conservation easement:
o
(1) Additional residential units (other than the existing residence, if present) are not
permitted within the designated conservation easement area. The applicant must
designate any areas to be set aside for residential development at the time of application.
The area must be subdivided from the eased property prior to closing. Any remaining
density left unused on lands under conservation easement shall be extinguished under the
terms of the conservation easement.
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnmenUinks/land....protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 9 of11
o
(2) Non-agricultural commercial or industrial development are not permitted within the
designated conservation easement. The applicant must designate any areas to be set
aside for non-agricultural commercial or industrial development at the time of application.
The area must be subdivided from the eased property prior to closing.
c. Permitted Uses.
Lands under a development rights conservation easement may continue to be used for the
following purposes, except as regulated by the specific terms of the conservation
easement and as restricted by local zoning requirements and other applicable regulations:
o
(1) Customary agricultural uses, including seasonal agricultural businesses and customary
home occupations, as defined by the Washington County Development Code or ordinances
of other local units of government.
(2) Land conservation and management activities, as specified in the terms of the
conservation easement.
(3) The landowner's residence or farmstead.
(4) Replacement, expansion or modification of existing buildings within the immediate
area of the house site or farmstead, up to a specified percentage of the original building
footprint(s), which shall be negotiated as part of the terms of the conservation easement.
(5) Customary agricultural buildings shall be permitted as specified in the terms of the
conservation easement.
(6) other activities and alterations that may occur on the property shall be defined by the
terms of the conservation easement. In general, such activities shall be permitted to the
extent that they do not lessen or degrade the resource values the conservation easement
is intended to protect and are permitted uses under the Washington County Development
Code and ordinances of the applicable local unit of government.
(7) A conservation plan prepared according to the standards of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service or similar agency shall be required for all agricultural land under
conservation easement.
SECTION 9. MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT
The conservation easements will be held by Washington County and may be co-held by
the Minnesota Land Trust, local governments, or any non-profit land conservation
organization qualified under Internal Revenue Code Section 1. 170A and Minnesota
Statutes Annotated Chapter 84C. The County will co-hold all Conservation Easements.
Other local units of government may also co-hold a Conservation Easement.
At the time the easement is purchased, a baseline data package will be compiled to
document the condition of the property at the time of easement purchase and to detail the
natural values of the parcel. Baseline data preparation and monitoring activities should
comply with the current standards of the Land Trust Alliance, the national standard-setting
organization for land trusts, or similar accepted standards.
o
A conservation easement is only effective if it is enforced. The County could contract with
the Minnesota Land Trust, another organization, or individual for monitoring parcels in the
PDR program. A yearly inspection of each parcel, scheduled with the landowner, will occur
and be documented. Periodic updates of the baseline data will also be done to keep an
ongoing record of the natural values. New landowners should be educated on the terms of
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/land-protectionjun...l1/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 10 of 11
o
the easements. If violations occur, enforcement of the terms of the easement must be
undertaken. Enforcement can range from meeting and negotiating with the landowner to
court-enforced remedies.
The Minnesota Land Trust (MLT) is a non-profit land conservation organization that
negotiates and holds conservation easements. MLT began in Washington County and has a
very active Washington County chapter which holds and monitors over 20 conservation
easements in the County. Washington County could consider having the MLT hold, monitor
and enforce the development rights easements. The County could also "contract out"
negotiation of easement terms or certain other program functions to MLT.
The responsibilities of MLT could also include:
. Preparation of draft easements
. Establishing baseline documentation for monitoring program
. Establishing monitoring program -- periodic site visits or contacts with landowners --
annual monitoring of sites
. Educating future landowners about restrictions when parcels are sold
. Addressing any violations -- notifying landowner and, if necessary, enforcing
through the court system
. Negotiating the specific terms of the easements with landowners (above and beyond
the County terms) and draft the easement
. Educating landowners on conservation easements
o
MLT currently requests a stewardship fee which goes into an endowment fund to cover
long-term monitoring/enforcement costs.
SECTION 1.0. FUNDING FOR THE PROGRAM
A. County Program
The Washington County PDR Program is proposed to be funded through a dedicated
property tax increase of $1.50 per month per $100,000 of assessed value. This amount
would fund the program at approximately $1.8 million annually. Based on an assumed
development right value of $10,000 per acre, this would protect at a minimum 180 acres
per year if lump sum payments were made to landowners. If the value per acre were
$8,000, 225 acres could be protected with lump sum payments. More acres could be
protected if installment payments were made, or funds from other sources were used, or if
the landowner chose to sell at a bargain sale. An estimate of the maximum number of
acres would be 2,500 per year at $10,000 per acre, or 3,240 at $8,000 per acre.
Additional sources of funding that may be. pursued would include:
o
.. Matching funds from new or existing state programs
. Matching funds from new or existing federal programs
. MPCA or Metropolitan Council penalties levied for pollution
. Cooperation with wildlife and sporting organizations
. Corporations
. Private foundations
. Individual donations for specific projects
B. Local Match Program
6)
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/land...protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Document
Page 11 of 11
o
Using a portion of the funds (perhaps 20%) received through additional property tax
revenues, the County will provide matching grants to local units of governments for
acquisitions. This program would target acquisitions of parks, open space or easements
outside of the Green Corridor Opportunity Areas that meet local protection goals.
Guidelines for the matching grant program would be developed separately from the PDR
Program. The County Board would establish funding levels yearly.
Home I Info for Residents I Info for Business I Things to Do Here I Employment Opportunities
Department & Services Directory A-Z I Your County Government
General Information Call: 651-430-6000. (TTY: 651-430-6246)
Directions to Washington County Government Center
14949 62nd Street North. PO Box 6 . Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0006
@ 2005 Washington County. Security/Privacy/Accessibility Statement. Contact Washington County.
o
o
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county_government_links/landyrotectionjun...l1/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR
Page 10f5
eJa~ton
-~COOnty
Your County
Government Links
County Mission
Advisory Boards
Committee
Vacancies
County Calendar
Performance
Measurement -2005
Residential Survey
Results - 2006
Land Protection
Funding
Referendum
- PDR Intro -
Purchase of Dev
Rights
o
o
Ordinance 144
Purchase of Development Rights
. PDR Policy and Procedure Document
. Green Corridor Opportunity Areas Map (PDF)
SECTION 1. TITLE AND PURPOSE.
1.1 Pursuant to Minnesota Statute, 84C and Minnesota Statute 373.40, Washington
County establishes a Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) Program for the purpose of
preserving Open Space, including natural and scenic areas and productive Agricultural
Land, while the fee title to these lands remains in private ownership. The program's
policies, rules and official controls are adopted in this ordinance, hereafter known as the
Washington County Purchase of Development Rights Ordinance.
1.2 Purchase of Development Rights will occur within the "Green Corridor Opportunity
Areas." The map with this title is hereby identified and made a part of this
Ordinance as Attachment 1 (PDF) These lands, chosen through an extensive analytical
and public process, encompass contiguous blocks and Corridors of high-quality natural
areas, productive Agricultural Land and scenic views within the County. They surround and
connect the County park system and many other public and private Open Space areas.
Existing zoning restrictions, while effective at controlling densities, cannot keep these
lands in their present undeveloped state. Purchase of Development Rights is one of
several voluntary, incentive-based means for achieving public benefits through private
land conservation. This program directly confers a public benefit through voluntary private
action.
1.3 Purpose.
This Ordinance is adopted for the following purposes:
(1) To protect and preserve the rural landscape and high-quality natural areas that make
Washington County a special place to live.
(2) To implement the goals of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan regarding
protection of rural areas, specifically the following:
. Preserve the rural character and landscapes of Washington County.
. Preserve agriculture as a permanent land use and a viable economic activity in the
County.
. Maintain a distinction between urban and rural areas.
. Use zoning, parks, public Open Space, trails and roads to create a distinctive north-
south "green" Corridor through the County.
(3) To serve additional public purposes through Open Space protection, including storm
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county_government_links/land-protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR
Page 2 of5
o
water management, habitat protection, trail Corridor extension, and linking of public parks
and other amenities.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS
2.1 For the purpose of this Ordinance, certain words and phrases are defined as follows:
(1) Agricultural Land: Land whose use is devoted to the production of crops, livestock, and
vegetables, as well as to dairy, poultry and horticultural products, equestrian activities and
alternative products of the land.
(2) Conservation Easement: A non possessory interest in real property whereby the holder
may impose certain limitations or affirmative obligations the purposes of which include
retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open-space values of real property, assuring its
availability for agricultural, forest, recreational, or open-space use, protecting natural
resources, maintaining or enhancing air or water quality, or preserving the historical,
architectural, archaeological, or cultural aspects of real property. (Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 84C.)
(3) Corridor: Protected areas of Open Space linked together throughout the community.
(4) County Board: The Washington County Board of Commissioners.
o
(5) Development: An activity which materially alters or affects the existing conditions or
use of any land.
(6) Development Rights: The right to use and subdivide land for any and all residential,
commercial and industrial purposes and activities which are not incident to agriculture and
Open Space.
(7) Eligible Land: Properties for which the purchase of Development Rights is authorized
pursuant to this Ordinance.
(8) Open Space: Land used for agriculture, natural habitat, pedestrian and/or scenic
views, that is undivided and permanently protected from future Development.
(9) Resource Values: The values that a Conservation Easement is intended to protect, as
defined and recorded in the baseline documentation. Values may include but are not
limited to natural habitat, productive Agricultural Land, scenic views and connections to or
extensions of existing parks or protected Open Space.
(10) Selection Round: A cycle of the Purchase of Development Rights Program, from initial
advertisement of the program through completion of offers to purchase Development
Rights Conservation Easements.
o
SECTION 3. AUTHORIZATION
3.1 The County Board may use any legally available revenue source to acquire
6j)
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojoryesidents/your_county_government_links/land....Protectionjun...l1/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR
Page 3 of5
o
Conservation Easements over any Eligible Land within the County, as authorized in Section
5, including but not limited to purchase, gift, grant, bequest, devise, covenant or contract.
The collected tax revenues shall be used to acquire such property interests only upon
application of the Owner and in a strictly voluntary manner.
3.2 The value of Conservation Easements shall be determined as provided in Section 7 of
this Ordinance and attendant Program Policy and Procedure Document.
3.3 The County Board is authorized to enter into cash purchase and/or investment
purchase contracts consistent with applicable law for the purposes of this Program
3.4 The County Board may participate jointly in the acquisition of interests in Eligible
Lands with other qualified organizations empowered to hold interest in real property in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 84C.Ol-05.
3.5 The County Board may contract. with a recognized and legally established nonprofit
conservancy, land trust, or other individual or organization qualified under Minnesota
Statutes Section 84C.Ol and 170(H) of the United States Internal Revenue Code, in order
to share in the process of negotiating Conservation Easements and establishing both the
baseline studies and the procedures for monitoring of any Conservation Easements
acquired under this Ordinance.
o
SECTION 4. ESTABLISHMENT OF ADVISORY COMMIITEE
4.1 The County Board shall appoint a volunteer Advisory Committee which shall advise
the Board on the selection of Eligible Lands on which Development Rights are offered for
acquisition by their owners and other program activities.
SECTION 5. ELIGIBILITY AND PRIORITIES
5.1 Prior to each Selection Round, the County Board shall establish criteria to be used in
prioritizing applications and determining which offers to consider. The criteria will be
contained in a Program Policy and Procedure Document.
SECTION 6. SELECTION PROCESS
6.1 The PDR program shall have a periodic application and selection process, termed a
"Selection Round." The timing and process to be used will be described in a Program Policy
and Procedure Document.
o
SECTION 7. CONSERVATION EASEMENT VALUATION
7.1 Development Rights Calculation
The value of Conservation Easements shall be based on the number of development rights
@
http://www.co.washingtan.mn.us/infojarJesidents/your_county~ovemment_links/1and...protectionjun...l1/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR
Page 4 of5
o
remaining on a parcel of land, as determined by the number of dwelling units that would
be permitted given the minimum lot size and lot widths for conventional subdivisions and
other requirements of applicable development codes.
7.2 Valuation Methods.
The value of Conservation Easements shall be determined using a method established by
the County Board prior to each Selection Round. Appraisals may be used, or an equivalent
method of valuing Conservation Easements may be determined using assessed valuation,
appraisal sampling, or other methods. The method to be used will be specified at the
beginning of each Selection Round and will be described in the Program Policy and
Procedures Document.
SECTION 8. NATURE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT RESTRICTIONS
8.1 Nature of Restrictions.
Conservation Easements shall be permanent. The specific terms of the Conservation
Easement shall be negotiated on a case-by-case basis within the guidelines specified in
the Program Policy Procedures Document. The terms will be designed to protect the
property's Resource Values, as defined through the initial application and the ranking and
selection process.
o
8.2 Holding of Conservation Easements.
Conservation Easements shall be held by a qualified unit of government, conservation
organization, land trust or similar organization authorized to hold interest in real property
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 84C.Ol-OS, at the direction of the County Board.
SECTION 9. CONSERVATION EASEMENT MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT
9.1 Documentation.
At the time the Conservation Easement is recorded, documentation of the property shall
be conducted, using aerial photographs, maps, photos and/or other media, as a baseline
for future monitoring. Such documentation shall be updated periodically by the
Conservation Easement holder(s). Such studies and monitoring shall be conducted
according to commonly accepted best practices.
9.2 Frequency of monitoring.
Conservation Easements shall be monitored on an annual basis to ensure compliance.
Monitoring may include a site visit, with prior notice to the landowner.
9.3 Enforcement.
If the terms of the Conservation Easement are violated, the Conservation Easement holder
(s) may pursue all legal remedies available, including, but not limited to, specific
performance.
Adopted February 8, 2000
o
Home I Info for Residents I Info for Business I Things to Do Here I Employment Opportunities
Department & Services Directory A-Z I Your County Government
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county_government_links/landyrotectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR
Page 5 of5
o
General Information Call: 651-430-6000 . (TTY: 651-430-6246)
Directions to Washington County Government Center
14949 62nd Street North. PO Box 6. Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0006
@ 2005 Washington County. Security/Privacy/Accessibility Statement. Contact Washington County.
o
o
0)
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojoryesidents/your_county~overnmenUinks/land....protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Worksheet
Page 1 of3
~ton
~.County
Your County
Government Links
County Mission
Advisory Boards
Committee
Vacancies
County Calendar
Performance
Measurement - 2005
Residential Survey
Results - 2006
land Protection
Funding
Referendum
- PDR Intro -
Purchase of Dev
Rights
o
o
Purchase of Development Rights
Public Hearing Document
Attachment 2 - PDR Sample Worksheet
. PDR Policy and Procedure Document
. Purchase of Development Rights - Ordinance 144
. Green Corridor Opportunity Areas Map (PDF)
. PDR Site Evaluation Criteria
Points Min. Med. Max.
Natural Resource Values
1. Substantial forest interior 3 5 8
2. Presence of lakeshore or stream corridor 3 5
< 1/4 mi. = 3; 1/4 mi. + = 5
3. County Biological Survey site or area site 8 10
= 8; area = 10
4. Presence of erosion prone soils (incl. steep 3
slopes)
Max. points 26
Agricultural
1. Active ago in large blocks 3 4 5
2. Prime or signif. soils prime = 3; signif. = 2 3
2
< 1/4 mi. = 3; 1/4 mi. + = 5
3. Enrollment in Ag. Preserves or Green 5
Acres
4. Historic farmstead or landmark 3 5
landmark (Natl.jState reg.) = 5;
farmstead = 3
Max. points 18
Spatial
1. Proximity to parks/protected lands
within 1/2 mi. = 7; adjacent = 10
2. Application size> 80 ac. (could be
multiple contiguous
7
10
5
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~ovemment_links/land....protectionjuno..11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR Worksheet
Page 2 of3
0 parcels under single ownership)
3. Public access 2 5
Enhances existing rec. opportunity = 5
Does not enhance rec. opportunity = 2
4. Presence in designated scenic corr. 5
5. Presence for munic. sewer -5
landmark (Natl.jState rc;g.) = 5;
farmstead = 3
Max. points 25
Planning/Zoning
1. Comprehensive plan designation 3
ago or resource protect.
2. Zoning - max. densities 2 3 5
1:10 = 2; 1:20 = 3; 1:40 = 5
Max. points 8
o
Total non- 77
discretionary
Max. points
Field Evaluation - Phase 2 points
1. Additional natural values (field check)
2. Additional scenic values (field check)
3. Serves multiple public purposes
1 point each, up to 5
5
5
5
Max. points 15
Total Max. 92
points
The following factors will also be considered during final evaluation of parcels:
willingness to offer a bargain sale, opportunities for leveraging additional
funding sources, and multiple applications from the same general area.
o
Home I Info for Residents I Info for Business I Things to Do Here I Employment Opportunities
Department & Services Directory A-Z I Your County Government
General Information Call: 651-430-6000. (lTY: 651-430-6246)
Directions to Washington County Government Center
14949 62nd Street North. PO Box 6. Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0006
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/info jor Jesidents/your _county _govemment_links/land -protection jun...
@
11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR eval criteria
Page 1 of 4
~ton
-~COUnty
Your County
Government Links
County Mission
Advisory Boards
Committee
Vacancies
County Calendar
Performance
Measurement - 2005
Residential Survey
Results - 2006
Land Protection
Funding
Referendum
- PDR Intro -
Purchase of Dev
Rights
Q
o
Year 2000 Pilot Program
Site Evaluation Criteria
. PDR Policy and Procedure Document
. Purchase of Development Rights - Ordinance 144
. Green Corridor Opportunity Areas Map (PDF)
. PDR Criteria Worksheet
I. Initial Eligibility
All of the following factors must be present for a parcel to be considered for
the PDR Program.
A. Willing Seller/Donor
A voluntary application is submitted by the landowner or on the landowner's
behalf. The applicant is willing to place a permanent conservation easement
on the parcel. Public or private ownership of fee title or a conservation
easement contributes to the effective, long-term protection of the site and its
open space values.
B. Within the Green Corridor Opportunity Area
The parcel is located within the Green Corridor Opportunity Area as shown on the map
adopted as part of the Washington County Purchase of Development Rights Ordinance.
(Hyperlink to Map.) (PDF)
C. Correspondence With Zoning Classification
The parcel is larger than the minimum lot size required by the applicable
zoning district, except in cases where it can be demonstrated that the parcel
fills a significant gap between, or is adjacent to, other protected high-value
resources or open space.
D. Development Rights
The parcel has some development rights remaining under current zoning.
Parcels that have been developed to the maximum allowed under density-
based zoning are not eligible for consideration.
/I. Ecological Functions
The largest blocks of natural habitat in Washington County are shown on the
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infoJorJesidents/your_county_govemmenUinks/landyrotectionJun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR eval criteria
Page 2 of 4
o
"Large Blocks of Natural Habitat" layer in the Green Corridor analysis. Current
and anticipated use of lands adjacent to the site should not, over time,
significantly diminish the ecological quality of the site.
A. Forest Interior
The parcel is a relatively large tract with a high interior to edge ratio. Areas
where the largest blocks of forest land exist are identified on the "Forest
Interior Criteria Layer" of the Green Corridor Project analysis.
B. County Biological Survey Sites
The parcel contains one or more native plant communities, is relatively
undisturbed and provides habitat for a wide variety of resident and/or
migratory wildlife. The presence of a "state listed" species is an added value.
These areas are identified on the Natural Areas Map created by the
Department of Natural Resources Minnesota County Biological Survey project.
C. Frontage Along Water Bodies
The parcel is located adjacent to an intermittent or perennial stream or a DNR
protected public water.
III. Environmental Functions
o
Natural areas and other open spaces provide a wide variety of environmental
benefits to people. Potential parcels, if protected, could improve surface and
ground water resources, stabilize soils, and create natural flood storage
capacity.
A. Erosion-prone and Steep Slopes
The parcel is identified as being erosion prone or a steep slope according to
the Natural Resources Conservation Service classifications. These are soils
with a class greater than or equal to "Se".
B. Ground Water Sensitivity
The parcel is located within an area identified on the Washington County
Geologic Atlas as very highly sensitive to ground water contamination.
IV. Other Functions
A. Historical Characteristics
The parcel is listed as an historical site on the State Register of Historic Sites.
The parcel has been registered as a Century Farm.
o
B. Scenic Values
The parcel is located within a corridor designated as scenic by congressional
or state legislative action, by local unit of government resolution or ordinance,
CJ\
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/land-protectionjun...11/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR eval criteria
Page 3 of 4
o
or some other formal method. Existing corridors include St. Croix Riverway
and County Road 21.
V. Location
A. Connectivity
The parcel is near or adjacent to other land which has already been
permanently protected from development through a conservation easement,
deed restriction, or public ownership. The parcel is near or adjacent to land
under public ownership that is specifically designated for long-term
conservation purposes and protected from development. The parcel provides
habitat and a corridor that promotes the movement of wildlife in order to
stabilize and/or enhance wildlife populations.
B. Buffer
The parcel adds value to an existing public facility by buffering the facility
from encroaching development. The parcel protects the adjacent natural
areas, important open spaces, rivers, streams and lakes by reducing current
or future negative impacts.
C. Imminence of Threat
o
The parcel is threatened by development pressure and fragmentation. Only a
short period of time may be available to protect an area from being
permanently lost or degraded.
D. Visibility
The parcel, because of its size, location, ecological characteristics, or history,
can further natural resource protection and provide attention, identity and
stature to the PDR Program. Sites which bring these benefits to the Program
will receive strong consideration.
VI. Public Purpose
Many natural areas have the potential to serve many public purposes. In
order to maximize the public investment, priority will be given to parcels that
meet the needs of multiple partners.
A. Public Access
Although the primary focus of the PDR Program is to protect open spaces by
keeping the land in private ownership, there may be opportunities for the
public to use and enjoy these areas. Applicants who are willing to provide
public access to the parcel for purposes of education, stewardship or
recreation will receive additional consideration.
o
B. Multiple Public Purpose
The parcel has the ability to serve multiple public purposes, such as storm
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/1and....protectionjun...l1/22/2006
Washington County, MN - TPD - PDR eval criteria
Page 4 of 4
o
water management, recreation, environmental education, etc.
C. Preservation Plans
The parcel is within an area that is included in a land preservation program or
plan (e.g. wild and scenic river district, local greenways plan, conservancy
zoning district, historic preservation district, scenic roadway, etc.).
D. Local Support
Protection of the parcel is supported by nearby residents, the local community
and other governmental agencies, and other interested groups.
VII. Financial
Many parcels will require a combination of funding sources. This may involve contributions
of in-kind services or matching funds from other public agencies; private or non-profit
sources of funds; or a landowner willing to accept a payment of less than the appraised
value of the development rights. Priority will be given to situations that leverage the
County dollars. To receive this additional consideration, a letter of commitment regarding
the matching contributions must accompany the application.
VIII. Liability
o
The parcel will not become an unacceptable legal or financial liability due to know public
heath or safety concerns (e.g. pollution concerns, abandoned wells, open dump sites,
hazardous waste, unoccupied or degraded structures), real estate problems or issues
which would prevent an agreement from being reached (e.g. title problems, survey
problems, property encroachments, boundary disputes).
Home I Info for Residents I Info for Business I Things to Do Here I Employment Opportunities
Department & Services Directory A-Z I Your County Government
General Information Call: 651-430-6000. (TTY: 651-430-6246)
Directions to Washington County GovernmentCenter
14949 62nd Street North. PO Box 6. Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0006
@2005 Washington County. Security/Privacy/Accessibility Statement. Contact Washington County.
o
@
http://www.co.washington.mn.us/infojorJesidents/your_county~overnment_links/land-protectionjun...l1/22/2006
o
Washington County 2006 Land Protection Funding Referendum
Questions and Answers
What is the county trying to accomplish with these funds?
. The County Board is responding to public concerns about growth and its impact on the rural
character of the county.
. Public opinion surveys over the past 15 years consistently have shown that a majority of the
voters in the county value its rural character.
. A 2006 residential survey in the county found that two of the top three things that residents like
about living in Washington County are its rural character and its open spaces. They highly value
the easy access to parks, trails, and open spaces.
. 1bis funding would give the county the fmancial means to protect some of the remaining open
spaces as development continues at a rapid pace.
How much is the. county expected to grow in the future?
. Between 1990 and 2000, Washington County's population grew by 55,234, a 38% increase.
. By the year 2020, the population in Washington County is expected to increase to 316,000 a
growth of nearly 100,000 people.
. Much of the growth is expected to occur in the rural areas and in amenity areas such as along
lakes, rivers and streams, and near recreational trails, parks and other recreational features.
o
How much land does the county expect to protect and how much of the total land base is it?
. Between 1,200 and 5,000.
. The 1,200 - 5,000 acres is .005% - .02 % of the total land area of the county.
What % of the land base is already protected?
. Many acres ofland are already protected within county parks, state parks and other state
management units such as Scientific and Natural Areas and Wildlife Management Areas; federal
management units, local parks, private nature and outdoor education centers, conservation
developments and private conservation easements.
. The county is currently conducting a study to determine how much land is currently protected.
Is this type of referendum a new idea?
. No.
. Washington County has had a land protection program in place since 2000. It has partnered with
other organizations to complete seven projects protecting over 200 acres ofland. The referendwn
is needed to provide a stable long-term source of funds for the program.
. 15 of 19 similar bond measures have passed in Minnesota in the past 10 years.
. Voters in Dakota County approved a $20 million bond referendum in 2002 for a similar program
- the Farmland and Natural Areas Program.
. Woodbury voters approved a $9 million open-space initiative in 2005 to acquire open space and
provide more recreational facilities.
o
How do the Washington County and Dakota County programs differ?
Dakota County splits its funds between farmland and natural areas, and does not use its bond funds to
acquire lands within regional parks. The Dakota County program does not explicitly address water
quality. Through special criteria and land preservation agreements, Dakota County uses its farmland
funds to protect water quality.
Is this funding reaDy necessary?
1
~
o
. Washington County has seen tremendous growth during the past decade. This growth creates less
opportunity to protect some the green spaces and rural character that attracts people to the county.
. Land prices can be expected to increase as the amount of undeveloped land decreases. The
longer the county waits to protect some of the remaining priority open spaces, the harder and
more expensive it is likely to become.
. These funds would allow the county to continue to partner with other groups working on land
protection efforts and provides the matching funds necessary to attract grants from state, federal
or other sources.
How will the county decide what land to protect?
. The county will solicit applications from willing landowners.
. All applications will be evaluated and ranked using a set of criteria that reflect the county board's
priorities.
. On the highest ranked parcels, the county will go through a process to determine the land value,
negotiate an acceptable offer with the landowner, negotiate the terms of the conservation
agreements, and coordinate the real estate closing and recording of the agreement.
. The county will also work with other local units of government to identify critical lands that
should be protected.
o
What are the counties priorities?
. Continue acquiring the remaining 2800 acres of county parkland.
. Lands adjacent to waterways, recreational trails, parks and other public facilities.
. Further priority will be given to lands adjacent to already protected lands, serving multiple public
purposes, allowing public access and leveraging additional dollars from other sources.
Why not farmland?
. Although not explicitly stated as a purpose, farmland may be protected if the project serves
another of the stated purposes.
. The priorities set by the County Board reflect the interests expressed by county residents in
numerous surveys. Over the past 15 years, residents have continually expressed the highest level
of support for protecting sources of drinking water, lands along waterways, woodlands, and other
natural areas. Farmland has ranked much lower in priority.
Q
How will funding be targeted strategically to protect waters?
. Current evaluation criteria contain several references to protecting water resources:
o Parcels located adjacent to an intermittent or perennial stream or a DNR protected public
water.
o Parcels identified as being erosion prone or a steep slope according to the Natural Resources
Conservation Service classifications.
o Parcels located within an area identified on the Washington County Geologic Atlas as very
highly sensitive to ground water contamination.
o Parcels that protect the adjacent natural areas, important open spaces, rivers, streams and
lakes by reducing current or future negative impacts.
o Parcels within an area that is included in a land preservation program or plan.
. The county board will reevaluate its priorities annually and will revise the criteria to align with
the priorities.
. The county will work with watershed districts and others to identify areas that are of highest
priority to protect.
. County studies such as the Southern and Northern Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction
Studies and the Washington County Groundwater Plan, all completed in the last few years, could
2
@
o
o
o
be used to target areas for protection; the evaluation criteria could incorporate the results of these
studies.
Will my community be eligible for any ofthe funds?
. Yes, lands in all communities are eligible.
Will funds be limited to protecting lands within the county's Green Corridor Opportunities Area?
. No, this map is only a guide that illustrates where a majority of the remaining high priority
natural areas are.
What is the tax bill for the average home owner?
. The median priced home in 2005 was $215,000; at $12 per $100,000 value this property owner's
referendum tax would be $26.
Will the amount of the tax paid be the same every year for 10 years?
. The amount paid will be a maximum of $12 per $100,000.
. Property taxes are recalculated every year based on the total tax capacity.
. As the total tax capacity of the county increases the amount the individual tax payer pays per
$100,000 of value will decline.
Is the 10 years the amount of time to raise the $20 million or is it the time limit that the property
cannot be developed?
. The taxes to pay off the bond will be levied for 10 years.
. The conservation agreement would permanently restrict the property from being developed.
With this large amount of money available, will the county continue trying to find matching funds?
. Yes.
. The county will continue looking for opportunities to partner with local units of govermnent and
other organizations to accomplish mutual goals.
Why would the county want to buy conservation easements?
. The county saves money by not having to buy the land outright, it avoids the effort and liability
of maintaining the land and the land stays on the tax rolls.
Why would a landowner willingly place a conservation easement on the property?
. Landowners keep their property and still get some of its market value without having to sell it to a
developer.
. Landowners may also get tax benefits (property, income, estate) for donating a portion or all of
the value of the development rights.
Who would want to buy this land in the future if it can't be developed?
. There is a strong real estate market for large lots in a rural setting that are not surrounded by
housing.
How is the value of the development rights determined?
. The value is determined through a parcel-specific before and after appraisal process. The
appraiser first determines the fair market value of the unrestricted property before development
rights are sold, then the appraiser determines the fair market value of the property with the
restrictions; the difference is the appraised value of not developing the property.
3
@
Q
o
o
Would the county be paying for land that could never be developed anyway, i.e. wetlands, flood
plains, etc?
. No. If the land couldn't be developed it would be reflected in the appraised value of what the
landowner would receive for not developing the property.
Will landowners be forced to sell their land?
. Generally, it is the county board's philosophy and practice to obtain land from willing sellers
only.
. However, there could be a scenario that would require eminent domain proceedings to acquire a
piece of property. E.g. Recently the county used eminent domain to acquire a parcel in Big
Marine Park that was critical to opening the park to the public.
Since this is a strictly voluntary program, what happens to the 20 million dollars if no one decides
to participate?
. Ifno property owners are interested, the county could use the $20 million to pay off the bonds
early.
. This is unlikely to happen. The county could use up the funds just acquiring the remaining 2800
acres located within the county parks.
What is different from the similar ballot referendum the county sponsored in 2000?
. The ballot language more explicitly states the purposes for which the funds will be used.
. The ballot language does not reference the mechanisms that will be used to acquire the interests
in the property or a specific program.
· The amount of money that will be raised is $20 million; in 2000 it was $13.25 million.
. The impact on property owners is $12 rather than $18 per $100,000 of value.
. Farmland and seasonal dwellings are now exempt from paying this referendum tax.
N:\WP\GClfactsheets\ongoingQA.doc
4
6Y
o
o
o
(f)
CITY OF
NDOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2007-2011 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Review
DATE November 28, 2006
INTRODUCTION
City Departments have prepared a proposed 2007-2011 CIP that has been reviewed by the
Council at past workshops, most recently in detail on September 26, 2006 (minutes attached),
and just the trails portion on October 24, 2006 (minutes attached). The only other outstanding
item was the final review of park improvement projects by the Park and Recreation Commission.
Also attached is a "Draft" City of Andover 2007-2011 Capital Improvement Plan that will be the
focus of discussion at the December 5, 2006 CIP public hearing.
Underlined items in the Staff report will be discussed in further detail at the meeting.
DISCUSSION
Budl!et Guidelines:
The following are City Council's 2007 Budget Development guidelines (established by the City
Council on May 2, 2006) used by City Staff to prepare the proposed 2007-2011 CIP:
1) A commitment to maintain or reduce the City Tax Capacity Rate, utilizing recent market
value growth to meet the needs of the organization and positioning the City for long-term
competitiveness, staffing and capital requirements through sustainable revenue sources and
operational efficiencies.
2) A commitment to review various revenue streams. including but not limited to tax levy. state
aid. grants and special assessments. to adequately fund necessary City roadway
improvements.
3) A fiscal goal that works toward establishing the General Fund balance for working capital at
no less than 35% of planned 2007 General Fund expenditures.
4) A commitment to limit the 2007 debt levy to no more than 25% of the grOSS tax levy and a
commitment to a detailed city debt analysis to take advantage of alternative fmancing
consistent with the City's adopted Debt Policy.
1
o
o
o
5) A comprehensive review of the condition of capital equipment to ensure that the most cost-
effective replacement schedule is followed. Equipment will be reolaced on the basis of a cost
benefit analysis rather than a year based replacement schedule.
.
6) A team approach that encourages strategic planning to meet immediate and long-term
operational, staffing, infrastructure and facility needs.
7) A management philosophy that actively supports the implementation of Council policies and
goals, and recognizes the need to be responsive to changing community conditions, concerns
and demands in a cost effective manner.
Current City of Andover Capital Improvement Policv:
The following is the City of Andover adopted Capital Improvement Policy, which is part of the
City of Andover Financial Policies:
CITY OF ANDOVER FINANCIAL POLICIES
C. Capital Improvement Policy
1. A Capital Improvements Program (CIP) will be developed for a period of five years. As
resources are available, the most current year of the CIP will be incorporated into the current
year operating budget as the Capital Improvements Budget (CIB). The CIP will be reviewed
and updated annually. Years two through five are for planning purposes only.
2. The City will maintain its physical assets in a manner, adequate to protect the City's capital
investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. The City will
provide for maintenance and replacement from current revenues where possible.
3. To be considered in the Capital Improvements Program a project must have an estimated
cost of at least $5,000 in one of the calendar years of the project. Projects may not be
combined to meet the minimum standard unless they are dependent upon each other. Items
that are operating expense (such as maintenance agreements, personal computer software
upgrades, etc.) will not be considered within the CIP.
5. Capital projects, which duplicate other public and/or private service, will not be considered.
6. The City will identify the estimated costs and potential funding sources for each capital
project prior to inclusion in the CIP. The operating costs to maintain capital projects shall
be considered prior to the decision to undertake the capital projects.
7. Capital projects and/or capital asset purchases will receive a higher priority if they meet a
majority of the following criteria:
2
o
A. Mandatory project
B. Maintenance project (approved replacement schedules)
C. Improve efficiency
D. Provide a new service
E. Policy area project
F. Broad extent of usage
G. Length of expected useful life
H. Positive effect on operation and maintenance costs
I. Availability of county/state/federal grants
1. Elimination of hazards (improves public safety)
K. Prior commitments
L. Replacement due to disaster or loss
9.
The CIP is to be presented by the Finance Director annually to the City Council for approval.
Any substantive change to the CIP after approval must be approved by the City Council.
Proposed 2007 Capital Proiects Levv:
Capital Projects Levy - The 2007 Budget number for the Capital Projects Levy is part of the
2007-2011 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) review process.
o
. Road and Bridge - This levy is proposed for transportation programming related to
maintaining City streets, roadways and pedestrian trails. This would be the fourth year
that a portion of the Road & Bridge Fund is dedicated to pedestrian trail maintenance.
This levy is also used for the City's seal coating and crack sealing programs and to street
overlays and reconstructs. The 2007 Road and Bridge levy was calculated using an
additional 1 % of captured net tax capacity based on Council direction. The Council also
approved the policy for road assessments at the September 19th Council meeting. The
budget & CIP is designed to achieve the Council's goal of adequately funding necessary
City roadway improvements.
. Park Improvements - This levy is proposed as an annual appropriation to be used to
underWrite a wide range ofpllrk improvement projects as recommended by the Park and
Recreation Commission and approved by the City Council. This funding is intended to be
a long-term supplemental source of capital funding for park projects that would be
separately identified in the City's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. A 3% levy
increase is proposed. The park improvement projects presented the CIP were formulated
after discussions at the September 21st joint meeting of the City Council and the Park and
Recreation Commission and a subsequent Park and Recreation Commission meeting
(October 5. 2006 - minutes attached).
o
. Capital Equipment/Projects - Under the Capital Projects Levy. the levy proposed is
designated to capital improvement/equipment project expenditures, $78.400 of
expenditures is currently proposed for 2007. Through this designation, the City, over
time, will be able to build a fund reserve to avoid cash flow "spikes" and address a wide
'range of capital improvement needs such as facility maintenance projects under a more
controlled spending environment. This fund also serves as an emergency fund, when
3
o
o
o
unexpected capital improvement/equipment project expenditures No increase is proposed
for this levy in 2007, the levy is set at $210,000.
Debt Service Levy:
Annually the Finance Department conducts a detailed debt service analysis to monitor
outstanding debt and to look for early debt retirement or refinancing opportunities that will yield
interest expense saving to the City.
The preliminary Debt Service levy adopted September 5th and under consideration at the
December 5th Truth in Taxation hearing will provide for the following debt service payments:
. 2004A G.O. Capital Imp. Bonds
. 2004 EDA Public Facility Bonds
. 2005 G.O. Capital Imp. Bonds
. 2005B G.O. Equipment Certificate
. 2006B G.O. Equipment Certificate
$365,051
$889,718
$126,305
$ 63,945
$188,475
. There will also be an additional $200,000 added to the levy to accommodate a 2007 G.O.
Equipment Certificate to purchase equipment outlined in the 2007-2011 CIP.
. City Staff is pursuing a refinancing of the 2004 EDA Public Facility Bonds to potentially
reduce the long term debt service due on this bond.
. City Staff is pursuing a refinancing of the 2002 Water Revenue Bonds to potentially reduce
the long term debt service due on this Enterprise Fund bond.
ACTION REOUESTED
The Council is requested to review the 2007-2011 CIP updates and provide direction to staff
before the December 5th public hearing.
Attachments -September 26, 2006 City Council Minutes (Pg. 5)
-October 24, 2006 City Council Minutes (Pg. 6)
-October 5, 2006 Park and Recreation Commission (Pgs. 7-8)
- "Draft" City of Andover 2007-2011 CIP
4
o
o
o
Sf>?+ ~61~
cc
Special Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes - September 26, 2006
Page 9
have an increase in liability in terms of supervision. Mr. Dickinson suggested Eric Sutherland
should judge this issue.
City Administrator Jim Dickinson noted that with the dollars identified it could be handled. He.
added that he will be before the Council at the meeting on October 3rd to discuss the possibility of
refinancing. Those savings can come back in and the priority is to reduce the levy deal with the
capital campaign.
Mayor Gamache asked ifthere are any plans to increase fees for ice time. Mr. Dickinson answered
there will be some inflationary increases.
2007 - 2011 CIP UPDATES
City Administrator Jim Dickinson explained the City Departments prepared a proposed 2007-2011
CIP that was reviewed by the Council at the August 29th Council workshop. At that workshop, the
Council had some questions that required some additional staff research and analysis to which
updates are provided.
He said City Engineer Dave Berkowitz has provided a staff report that provides updates to the
"Crosstown Boulevard NW & Nightingale Street NW Intersection Improvements" and "Water
System Improvements". This will be covered more in depth in October.
Mr. Dickinson noted there will be some changes to the construction of bikeways and trail corridors.
He asked if the intersection improvement construction at Crosstown could be moved to 2007 and
the trail construction completed at the same time. Council agreed to move this one project. This
item will be brought up at the next workshop.
Mayor Gamache asked about Hidden Creek trail between Crooked Lake Blvd. and the park. The
sidewalk comes all the way up from Meadow Creek. It stops at the park and goes behind the park.
Across the street there is a retaining wall. It starts and stops. People try to take trails to Andover
Station. He asked if this could be researched to be safer.
OTHER BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Gambling Ordinance Modification
City Administrator Dickinson stated a letter was received regarding modifications in the gambling
ordinance. He asked when this should be discussed and put on the Agenda.
Councilmember Jacobson said he would like to see more support from the community before any
changes are made.
G)
o
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes - October 24, 2006
Page 3
Dc t ~4'h
CC
the City in the next few weeks. He reviewed what had been done to date.
Councilmember Orttel asked if it was possible to widen and shoulder the street in the future when it
would be State Aid eligible. City Engineer Berkowitz responded that was a possibility.
2007-2011 CIP UPDATESITRAIL SYSTEM DISCUSSION
City Engineer Berkowitz requested Council review the proposed trail map and direct staff on trail
improvements for the 2007-2011 Capital Improvement Plan.
Councilmember Trude suggested whoever is writing the newsletter, should put in an update on the
Hanson Boulevard trail.
Councilmember Knight stated they should try and have a crossing up by the schools and City Hall.
Councilmember Trude stated she supported the trail on the north side of Crosstown. She indicated
there are a lot of children walking in this area all year long.
o Councilmember Jacobson asked if they could have some trails in the City that were not blacktopped.
The consensus of Council was to do the trail on the north side of Crosstown.
Councilmember Trude asked if they could look at six-foot trails instead of eight-foot trails. City
Engineer Berkowitz responded they could not go less than eight-foot trails. He indicted if the trails
were classified as a sidewalk, they could go down to five feet.
City Administrator Dickinson noted once you get below eight feet, it is so labor intensive there was
no cost savings.
Councilmember Trude stated if a trail is really expensive, they might want to look at putting in a
sidewalk instead of a trail.
Mayor Gamache indicated they could put a sidewalk on one side and a trail on the other side. City
Engineer Berkowitz stated they could do a comparison, but noted the trail fee would not be used for
a sidewalk.
) ~ouncilmemb" Ortrel "">led they ""uld cbaoge the onIinaooe, whieh would .now trnil fees to pay
o.---;r sidewalks.
2007 BUDGET UPDATEIENTERPRISE FUNDS AND COMMUNITY CENTER
City Administrator Dickinson stated the Council has had a number of reviews of the 2007 Proposed 1/'\
Budget that would be supported by the 2007 Tax Levy. At the last meeting, only a few questions ~
o
o
o
~~ t K '\
~t'"c
0(+ $....--
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING - OCTOBER 5, 2006
MINUTES
The regular Bi-monthly Meeting of the Andover Park and Recreation Commission was
called to order by Chair Masloski on October 5, 2006, 7:38 p.m., at Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Commissioners Present:
Chair Dan Masloski, Wendy Albee, Jeremy Boyer, Dave
Blackstad, Jim Lindahl, and Bill Hupp
Commissioners Absent:
Ernest Bedor
Also Present:
Parks Coordinator, Todd Haas
RESIDENTS FORUM
Barb Griel of 13992 Eagle Street NW, a resident of Bunker Lake Village Townhomes
expressed the concern she shared with her neighbors that underage drinking and petty
vandalism was occurring in the Hills of Bunker Lake West Park. She suggested that
lighting and paving the parking lot could deter this.
Commissioner Lindahl inquired about the specifics. Ms. Griel responded that satellites
had been tipped over several times.
Chair Masloski requested that Parks Coordinator Haas check to see if a light could be
installed. Parks Coordinator Haas assured the Commission he would.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Page 4, paragraph: "He indicated that Chuck Traum was open to discuss the issue 'with
staff."
Motion by Commissioner Blackstad, seconded by Commissioner Boyer, to approve the
September 7, 2006 Park Commission minutes as presented. Motion carried on a 6-ayes,
O-nays, I-absent (Bedor) vote.
RECONSIDER PROPOSED 2007-2011 PARK CIP
Chair Masloski inquired if there were any changes to reconsider for 2007 ofthe Park CIP.
Commissioner Boyer stated that there was a desire for a building for concessions more
than lights. Chair Masloski added that pull tabs was also an issue.
(j)
o
Regular Andover Park and Recreation Commission Meeting
Minutes - October 5, 2006
Page 2
Commissioner Lindahl stated there was a need for more specific numbers from the
associations. In addition, the City Council expressed concerns about irrigating fields
instead oflighting fields. He inquired if the soccer fields could be located at one central
location. If irrigation were installed, Timber Trails, Fox Meadows or Hawk Ridge Parks
could be playable throughout the year. Andover Station North ball field facility could be
a good central location with irrigation and lights. Chair Masloski responded that he
believed the money should be kept where it was because it had been bonded for that
purpose. He noted the subsequent years could be adjusted.
Commissioner Blackstad noted that irrigation was a hot topic, and the associations could
assist the City in funding for it. Commissioner Lindahl stated that Rose, Terrace and
Andover Lions' Park are examples that couldbe.irrigated for the fall soccer program.
Commissioner Hupp inquired if it was in Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA).
Parks Coordinator Haas responded that these 3 parks are currently located within MUSA
boundaries.
Commissioner Blackstad clarified that it would be the least costly to irrigate within the
MUSA boundaries. For an example, Hidden Creek North baseball and soccer fields were
redesigned and irrigation was installed.
o
Chair Masloski recommended a tour of all the parks in the spring, late March or early
April. He requested a map of all the parks from staff.
Commissioner Blackstad requested that the money for Andover Station North ballfield
facility should be used there. He believed that when the Commission builds a new park
they should complete it.
Commissioner Lindahl recommended noting in the CIP that irrigation should be
addressed. Chair Masloski clarified that it should be discussed in June or July of 2007
for consideration for the 2008 or the 2009 Park CIP.
Commissioner Hupp requested that more discussion take place before passing the CIP.
Chair Masloski noted that the 2007 CIP was the important focus, and the following years
were fluid.
Motion by Commissioner Blackstad, seconded by Commissioner Boyer to approve the )
CIP as proposed. Motion carried 5-ayes, I-nay, I-absent (Bedor) vote. ---!
UPDATE OF SCOREBOARDS AT PRAIRIE KNOLL PARK/06-39
Parks Coordinator Haas stated that the scoreboards came in this week and would be
installed early next week.
o
@
e
o
o
,
~. .~ ~'-.
2007 --- 201 1 Capital Improvement Flan
1685 Crosstown J::>lvd NW, Andover, MN 55}O+
fhone: 76}155.5100 fax: 76';155.892';
www..ci.andover..mn.us
I
CITY OF ANDOVER
2007- 2011 Capital Improvements Plan
c
Table of Contents
Introduction
2007 - 2011 Capital Improvement Plan Message .......................................................................................1
CIP Project Development & Process Authorization Schedule .................................................................... 4
Graph - 2007 Expenditures By Department................................................................................................6
Graph - CIP Expenditures By Y ear .............................................................................................................6
Five Year Summary of Expenditures By Department .................................................................................7
Five Year Summary of Revenue By Source ................................................................................................ 8
Five Year Summary of Projects By Department & Revenue Source ..........................................................9
o
Improvements
Five Year Summary of Expenditures By Department - Improvements ......................................................15
Five Year Summary of Revenue By Source - Improvements .....................................................................16
Five Year Summary of Projects By Department & Revenue Source - Improvements ...............................17
Improvement Projects By Department
Central Equipment.................................................................................................................................21
Community Center ................................................................................................................................22
Engineering ........................................................................................................................................... 24
Facility Management ................................................................................... .......................................... 26
Parks & Recreation - Operations ..........................................................................................................38
Parks & Recreation - Projects............................................................................................................... 39
Sanitary Sewer ....................................................................................................................................... 60
Storm Sewer ..........................................................................................................................................68
Streets / Highways ................................................................................................................................. 70
Water ..................................................................................................................................................... 107
Equipment
Year Summary of Expenditures By Department - EquipmenL..................................................................117
Five Year Summary of Revenue By Source - EquipmenL.........................................................................118
Five Year Summary of Projects By Department & Revenue Source - Equipment..................................... 119
Equipment By Department
Central Equipment................................................................................................................................. 122
Community Center ................................................................................................................................ 125
Elections ................................................................................................................................................ 128
Engineering ........................................................................................................................................... 129
Facility Management............................................................................................................................. 131
Fire Department....................................................................................................;................................ 132
Parks & Recreation - Operations ..........................................................................................................143
Planning & Zoning ................................................................................................................................ 153
Sanitary Sewer .......................................................................................................................................154
Storm Sewer .......................................................................................................................................... 155
Street Signs .................................... ........................................................................................................ 157
Streets / Highways ............................................................................................. .................................... 159
o
Appendix .
Road & Bridge Fund Projected Fund Balance.............................................................................................167
Park Improvement Fund Projected Fund Balance .......................................................................................168
Trail Fund Projected Fund Balance .............................................................................................................169
Water System Financial Projections ............................................................................................................170
Sewer System Financial Projections............................................................................................................171
e
o
o
1
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CJ.ANDOVER.MN.US
"TO:
Mayor and Council Members
FROM:
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator / Finance Director
SUBJECT:
2007 - 2011 Capital Improvement Plan
DAlE:
December 5, 2006
INTRODUCTION
On behalf of the City's Management Team, I am pleased to present the City of Andover's Capital
Improvement Plan for years 2007 through 2011. The City's management team and their respective staff
worked diligently to produce a document that was both practical, substantive in addressing needed capital
improvements and insightful regarding the underlying factors associated with the City's rapidly changing
suburban landscape.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GOALS
ACKNOWLEDGE AND COMMUNICATE
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES AND DYNAMICS
ENSURE APPROPRIATE RESPONSES
TO CHANGING INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS AND DEMANDS
DEVELOP A FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT OF CAPITAL RESOURCES
A VAll-ABLE TO MEET FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECT PLANNING NEEDS
INSTITUTE A STRATEGIC VISION
PREDICATED ON MAINTAINING A mGH QUALITY SERVICE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPABLE OF
MEETING THE NEEDS OF OUR CrnZENS FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW
The purpose of the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is to identify, prioritize and address
community needs through careful long-term capital planning and balanced public investment in
supporting physical infrastructure. To ensure that this commitment is both meaningful and achievable,
appropriate capital improvement factors were given significant consideration in developing a CIP that
addresses community priorities over the next five (5) years. The CIP will also provide a planning
foundation for future needs assessments to ensure the City is appropriately responding to the critical
infrastructure needs necessary for sustainable future growth. The CIP represents a beginning in terms of
producing a comprehensive planning response to address changing capital needs by developing a project
schedule that will lead to timely and cost-effective project completions.
1
.
DISCUSSION 0
The 2007 - 2011 CIP has been prepared as a strategic planning tool to assist the City Council in
identifYing proposed capital improvement projects over the next five years. With the inclusion of
preliminary financing sources, appropriate background information citing needs and projected cost
estimates, this document will provide Council with the needed information to begin the process for
planning improvements that meet the City's physical infrastructure needs. Consequently, the CIP serves
as a flexible guide plan to properly identify the critical components of the City's infrastructure, yet
maintain flexibility in determining project timeframes, project scope and possible funding sources. The
2007 - 2011 CIP continues the emphasis of judiciously managing the City's limited resources by
prudently planning for known and/or anticipated future capital expenditures.
A critical step in the plan adoption process is the collaborative nature of plan review that involves the
leadership of the City Counci~ the input of appointed Commissions and staff, and most importantly,
affected residents of the community. Consequently, the strategic value of this plan lies in the
acknowledgement of future needs by the goveruing body and the effective communication of those needs
to the general public during project development stages. Likewise, the availability and preliminary
designation of fiscal resources to serve both current and future needs is critical to the achievement of plan
outcomes that meet with Council approval. Following the approval of the plan, feasibility studies are
performed, affected constituencies are notified to formally disseminate and receive public feedback on
proposed project plans. This process culminates with the City Council considering all relevant
information and making a final decision on whether to proceed with the proposed capital improvement.
The public process that supports the advancement of these projects from inception to completion is
engendered in the CIP project development and authorization schedule. Formalizing the steps in the CIP o. .
project advancement process serves a number of purposes and ensures that the Council and public are
kept well informed regarding project purposes and desired outcomes, estimated project costs, funding
sources, progress and final status. It should be emphasized that projects will require approval in various
stages of project development by the City Council in accordance with approved policies.
The objectives of the 2007 - 2011 Capital Improvement Plan are to present a comprehensive capital
improvement program that communicates efforts:
~ to ensure that community priorities are reflected in the capital investment plans
of each City department;
~ to provide a consolidated fmancial picture of anticipated expenditures and
outline recommended funding strategies to underwrite anticipated capital
improvements;
~ to document and communicate capital improvement processes for City projects
that will ensure consistency, a full appreciation of both the costs and benefits of
proposed capital investments, and raises the level of public understanding
regarding the City's public improvement processes;
~ to provide information on the fiscal impacts of capital investment plans on total
City finances; and
~ . to effectively plan for public improvements that support community needs in the
areas of private development infrastructure, transportation, public. safety, parks
and recreation, utilities, and commercial/industrial growth through fiscally
responsible economic development initiatiyes.
Accordingly, this document attempts to recognize known or perceived capital improvement needs, but as Cl
with any plan recognizes that social, economic and political considerations will by necessity determine
2
o
fmal project outcomes. The major categories of expenditures that are identified within the CIP include,
but are not limited to:
1. New Public Facilities Planning
2. Street Construction, Maintenance and Reconstruction
3. Utility Construction, Maintenance and Reconstruction
4. Construction, Maintenance and Upgrade of Parks, Playgrounds and Trails
5. Capital Improvements to Existing Facilities
6. Private development infrastructure
7. Capital equipment and vehicle planning needs (Equipment purchases. to be determined through
normal budgetary process)
The City Council, consequently, accepts this document with the provision that capital improvement
planning is subject to the dynamics of community growth, political leadership and acknowledges that
other unanticipated needs may take precedence over planned projects.
RECOMMENDATION
The 2007 - 2011 Capital Improvement Plan is the product of collaborative planning efforts by City staff,
the Park and Recreation Commission and the City Council. Projects have been introduced based on I)
anticipated future growth trends articulated in the City's 2020 Comprehensive Plan, 2) the natural cycle of
deterioration and decay evident in all physically constructed and engineered improvements in the more
established areas of the community and 3) capital deficiencies or infrastructure issues brought to the
City's attention through a variety of sources.
o Capital expenditures identified within the CIP are the best estimates available, and once the CIP is
adopted, will be reviewed and confirmed through individual feasibility reports where appropriate. I am
appreciative of the commitment, good judgment and expertise that each department has contributed to the
capital improvement planning process.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Dickinson
City Administrator / Finance Director
o
3
CIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
PROCESS AUTHORIZATION SCHEDULE
~
(.,;
The following process is a CounciVstaff guideline for authorizing public improvement projects. As this process
is controlled by State Statute and other influencing environmental factors, it is,subject to change and should be
viewed as a guide to assist the Council and public in understanding the public improvement process used by
City staff. A separate Council meeting would facilitate each step in the process, and accomplishment of
respective activities. As a result, the process time frame is a significant factor affecting City staff's ability to
properly manage and complete approved Council ordered pr,ojects within budget and on time.
1. Council Approval of Annual CIP Projects by City Resolution will authorize the following outcomes:
a) Staff and/or Consultant preparation of project feasibility studies
b) Staff preparation of detailed financial review of project funding sources
c) Neighborhood Meeting may be held prior to Feasibility Study subject to need and type of project.
TIME FRAME: October-November of each preceding year.
2. Presentation of Feasibility Study
a) Feasibility Study Components:
1) Review of Project Engineering and Construction Estimates
2) Total Project Costs (All related project costs, i.e. land, soft costs)
3) Project Financial Plan/Fiscal Implications (EngineeringlFinance)
4) Authorization to develop a Preliminary Assessment Roll, if any, for the Public Hearing. 0.-
(Engineering)
· If Council accepts Feasibility Study, A Resolution "Accepting Feasibility Study and Setting Date for
Public Hearing on the Projecf' when appropriate (Engineering Department) would initiate the
following:
1) Notices mailed to affected Residents per statute requirements no less than 10 days before Public
Hearing. (Engineering)
2) Public Hearing Notice is published. Two publications one week apart, with the second publication
no less than three days before the hearing. (Engineering/City Clerk)
TIME FRAME: February-March-April-May of current year.
3. Neighborhood Meeting - City staff will hold neighborhood project meetings, when appropriate, to review
and present Project Feasibility Studies, answer questions and meet with affected property owners. These
meetings will include a question and answer component designed specifically to bring awareness to the
property owner, obtain citizen input and produce an understanding of the purposes behind the City's
attempts to construct public improvements in the affected area
TIME FRAME: Following the presentation of the Feasibility Study to Council, but prior to the holding of a
Public Hearing by Council.
4. Council holds a Public Hearing when appropriate for following purposes:
a) Presentation of Project (Engineering Department)
b) Presentation of Preliminary Special Assessment Rolls and Financing Implications (EngineeringlFinance
Department)
c) Council to hear Affected Resident Input
d) Council determines whether to "order" the pub~ improvement
o
o
o
o
. A Council Resolution is drafted "Ordering the Project and Authorizing Preparation of Plans and
Specifications" (Engineering Department). Council may ORDER THE IMPROVEMENT after the public
hearing is closed or at a subsequent Council Meeting within 6 months of the public hearing date.
(Statutory Requirement - Council Resolution ordering project must be approved on 4/5 Council vote if it
is Council initiated project with assessments).
. If Council decides to reject the project as presented, a Council vote should be taken to officially
determine the final status of the project.
TIME FRAME: April-May-June of current year
5. Plans and Specifications are presented to Council for approval. (Engineering Department)
a) A Council Resolution is drafted authorizing the following:
1) Accepting and Approving Project Plans and Specifications
2) Authorizing the Advertisement for Project Bids. Bids are developed and invitation to Bid is
processed. Bid opening date.is no less than 3 weeks after publication. (Engineering)
3) Authorize staff to pursue an appropriate funding mechanism to underwrite project costs
TIME FRAME: May-June of each year
6. Council Acceptance of Project Bids and Awarding of Contracts would authorize the following outcomes:
a) A Council Resolution is drafted "Accepting Project Bids and Awarding Contracts" (Engineering)
b) Initiation of Project Construction and work (Engineering)
TIME FRAME: April-May-June-July of current year.
7. Project Completion
a) Council Acceptance of Project
b) Final Presentation and Review of Project Costs versus Project Budget by Finance Department.
c) If Special Assessments are financing a portion of the Project, A Council Resolution "Setting the Special
Assessment Hearing for Project #" is adopted at this same meeting. (Engineering/Finance)
TIME FRAME: Upon completion of project.
8. If Special Assessments would finance a portion of the projects costs, Council Holds a Special Assessment
Hearing to review the following:
a) Affected Property owners would be officially notified per statute no less than two weeks prior to Special
Assessment Hearing. (Clerk/Engineering)
b) Public Notice is published no less than two weeks prior to Special Hearing per statute
( Clerk/Engineering)
c) Staff prepares a proposed roll and Council Approves Final Assessment Roll (Engineering/Finance)
d) Council consideration of Assessment Appeals and Requested Deferrals filed prior to hearing or during
the hearing.
e) Meets M.S. Chapter 429 statutory requirements
. A Council Resolution is drafted "Adopting Final Special Assessment Roll"(Engineering), and IS
adopted at this meeting.
TIME FRAME: October/November of current year depending on fmalization of project and status of
completion.
5
CITY OF ANDOVER
2007 ClP Expenditures By Department
Water
Comm Ctr 1.01%
Parks & Rec-Proj. 0.28%
11.58%
Street Signs
1.53%
Engineering
7.33%
Storm Sewer
0.920
-"...
WI
Streets/Highways
72.07%
CITY OF ANDOVER
2007 CIP Expenditures By Year
$4,282,016
I
1 . I I
:=:-
2006 Adopted ~ ,690,013
$7.95r86
$9.254,888
2009
$7,9 8,799
$-
$6.000.000
$9,000,000
$3,000,000
6
~
~
$12.000.000
City of Andover, MN
0 Capital Plan
2007 thru 2011
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
Department 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Central Equipment 257,000 35,000 28,000 320,000
Community Center 15,500 7,000 7,000 15,000 44,500
Eiections 100,000 100,000
Engineertng 399,000 290,000 349,000 351,000 352,000 1,741,000
Facility Management 40,000 1,843,217 1,882,000 341,000 34,000 4,140,217
Fire 122,000 345,000 400,000 890,000 1,757,000
Park & Rae - Operations 99,500 105,500 175,000 40,000 114,000 534,000 .
Park & Rae - Projecls 630,000 217,000 110,000 675,000 25,000 1,657,000
Planning & Zoning 20,000 20,000
Sanitary Sewer 25,000 700,000 650,000 2,250,000 1,250,000 4,675,000
Storm Sewer 50,000 131,000 52,000 203,000 54,000 490,000
Street Signs 83,400 83,400
Streets I Highways 3,920,442 2,840,082 2,197,888 2,607,486 2,370,016 13,935,914
Water 55,000 1,340,000 3,175,000 550,000 55,000 5,175,000
GRAND TOTAL 5,439,842 7,938,799 9,254,888 7,957,486 4,282,016 34,873,031
0
o
7
City of Andover, .MN
Capital Plan 0
2007 thru 2011
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Source 2007 2009 2010 2011 Total
Assessments 873,092 331,896 228,765 691,417 1,302,267 3,427,437
Building Fund 515,217 515,217
Capital Equipment Reserve 242,000 242,000
Capital Projects Levy 78,400 143,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 290,400
Central Equipment Fund 7,000 35,000 28,000 70,000
Community Center Operations 15,500 7,000 7,000 15,000 44,500
Construction Seal Coat Fund 51,079 55,590 185,289 67,364 14,146 373,468
DNR Grant 62,500 62,500
Equipment Bond 606,500 825,500 776,000 890,000 74,000 3,172,000
Federal Funds 488,000 488,000
G.O. Bond 1,250,000 2,100,000 300,000 3,650,000
General Fund 10,000 57,000 50,000 58,000 50,000 225,000
Municipal Slate Aid Funds 392,000 945,400 370,000 567,000 643,000 2,917,400
Park Improvement Funds , 567,500 217,000 110,000 675,000 25,000 1,594,500 0
R & B - Crack Seal & Seal Coat 326,393 314,706 478,539 746,452 653,801 2,519,891
R & B -Overlays 718,478 610,490 686,295 724,253 693,802 3,433,318
R & B - Pedestrian Trail 48,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 52,000 250,000
R & B . Reserve 381,300 187,000 59,000 61,000 63,000 751,300
Sanitary SeWer Fund 300,000 300,000
Sewer Revenue Bonds 650,000 650,000
Sewer Trunk Fund 207,000 520,500 124,000 2,150,000 400,000 3,401,500
Stann Sewer Fund 50,000 131,000 52,000 203,000 54,000 490,000
Trail Funds 210,000 210,000
Water Fund 55,000 63,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 273,000
Water Revenue Bonds 2,950,000 2,950,000
Water Trunk Fund 299,100 1,173,500 299,000 650,000 150,000 2,571,600
GRAND TOTAL 5,439,842 7,938,799 9,254,888 7,957,486 4,282,016 34,873,031
o
8
City of Andover, MN
0 Capital Plan
2007 thru 2011
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
ICentral Equipment I
Canopy for Fuel Island 0948800-01 3 250,000 250,000
G.O. Bond 250,000 250,000
Replacement- Holsy Pressure Washer 0948800-02 3 7,000 7,000
Central Equipment Fund 7,000 7,000
Replacement - Roor Sweeper 10-48800-01 35,000 35,000
Central Equipment Fund 35,000 35,000
Replacement - Service Truck 10-48800-02 2 28,000 28,000
Central Equipmenl Fund 28,000 28,000
Central Equipment Total 257,000 35,000 28,000 320,000
ICommunity Center I
Walk Behind Floor Scrubber 07-44000-01 7,500 7,500
0 Community Center Operations 7,500 7,500
Carpet - West Side Entrance 07-44000-02 2 8,000 8,000
Community Center Operations 8,000 B,OOD
Kttchen Equipment - Fryer/Grill 08-44000-01 2 7,000 7,000
Community Centor Operations 7,000 7,000
Battery Pack Replacement - Zamboni 09-44000-01 2 7,000 7,000
Community ContlIr Operanons 7,000 7,000
Storage Building 10-44000-01 2 15,000 15,000
Connnunity Centor Opemtions 15,000 15,ODD
Community Center Total 15,500 7,000 7,000 15,000 44,500
IElections ,
Voting Equipment 08-41310-01 100,000 100,000
Capital Projocfs Levy 100,000 100,000
ElectioDS Total 100,000 100,000
IEngineering ,
New Development Projecls 07-41600-01 351,000 241,000 248,000 300,000 300,000 1,440,000
Sewer Tronk Fund 175,SOO 120,500 124,000 150,000 1SO,000 720,000
Waler Tronk Fund 175,SOO 120,500 124,000 150,000 1SO,000 720,000
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance 07-41600-02 48,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 52,000 250,000
R & B. Pedoslrian Trail 48,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 52,000 250,000
Replacement - Blazer #11 09-41600-01 2 30,000 30,000
Equipment Bond 30,000 30,000
0 Replacement - Total Station 09-41600-02 21,000 21,000
Equipment Bond 21,000 21,000
9
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2009 2010 20n' Total
Engineering Total 399,000 290,000 349,000 351,000 352,000 1,741,0000
IFacility Management I
Carpet Replacement 07-41900-01 2 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000
General Fund 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000'
Annual Parking Lot Maintenance 07-41900-02 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 110,000
Capital Projecls Levy 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 110.000
Communication Radios 07-41900-03 10,000 10,000
Capital Projecls Levy 10,000 10,000
Surface Seal all Brick Structures 08-41900-01 40,000 40,000
Capital Projecls Levy 22,000 22,000
Water Fund 18,000 18,000
Land Purchase 08-41900-02 515,217 515,217
Building Fund 515,217 515,217
Building A - Seal Floor 08-41900-03 7,000 8,000 15,000
Genera/Fund 7,000 8,000 15,000
Sail storage Building 08-41900-04 350,000 350,000
G.O. Bond 350,000 350,000
Recycling Building & Fence 08-41900-05 250,000 250,000
G.O. Bond 250,000 250,000
Attached storage Building 08-41900-06 200,000 200,000
G.O. Bond 200,000 200,000
Fire St. #2 Addition and Pariting Lot Improve. 08-41900-07 2 450,000 450,000
G.O. Bond 4511,000 450,000
Addition to storage Building & Vehicle Maint Shop 09-41900-01 1,850,000 1,850,0:0
G.O. Bond 1,850,000 1,8SD,
Pedestrian Tunnel Under Crosstown Blvd. 10-41900-01 300,000 300,000
G.O. Bond 300,000 300,000
Facility Management Total 40,000 1,843,217 1,882,000 341,000 34,000 4,140,217
IFire ~
Rescue Truck 07-42200-01 40,000 40,000
Equipment Bond 40,000 40,000
New Mobile Data Tenninals in Rre Trucks 07-42200-02 2 30,000 30,000
Equipment Bond 30,000 30,000
Thennallmaging Camera 07-42200-03 14,000 14,000
Equipment Bond 14,000 14,000
Replacement - Hydraulic Rescue Equipment 07-42200-04 2 30,000 30,000
Equipment Bond 30,000 30,000
Hose WasherlT ester 07-42200-05 2 8,000 8,000
Equipment Bond 8,000 8,000
Replacement - Rre Marshall Vehicle 08-42200-01 2 30,000 30,000
Equipment Bond 30,000 30,000
Replacement - Fife Tanker #31 08-42200-02 295,000 295,000
Equipment Bond 295,000 295,000
Water/Ice rescue boat 08-42200-03 20,000 20,000
Equipment Bond 20,000 20,000
Replacement - Fire Engine #11 09-42200-01 400,000 400,000
Equipment Bond 400,000 400':b
Replacement -Ladder Truck #11 10-42200-01 850,000 850,0
Equipment Bond 850,000 850,000
10
, .
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
0 Replacement - Fire Chiefs Vehicie 10-4220().{)2 2 40,000 40,000
Equipment Bond 4/1,000 4/1,000
Fire Total 122,000 345,000 400,000 890,000 1,757,000
!Park & Rec - Operations .
Repiace/Repair Play Structures - Various Par1<s 07 -4500().{)1 2 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
CspitBI Projects Levy 40,000 4/1,000
GenetalFund 40,000 4/1,000 40,000 4/1,000 160,000
Replacement - Self-Propelled 48' Sweeper 07 -45oo().{)2 2 20,000 20,000
Equipment Bond 20,000 20,000
Zero Turn Mower 07-45000..03 7,500 7,500
Equipment Bond 1,500 7,500
Replacement - Toro Groundsmaster 328 07-45000-04 32,000 32,000
Equipment Bond 32,000 32,000
Truck - 3/4 Ton Crew Cab 08-45000-01 35,000 35,000
Equipment Bond 35,000 35,000
Replacement - Mower Traiier 08-45OO()'{)2 8,500 8,500
Equipment Bond 8,SOO 8,500
Repiacement - Toro Groundmaster 08-45000..03 22,000 22,000
Equipment Bond 22,000 22,000
Replacement -large Capacity lawnmower 09-45000..01 112,000 112,000
Equipment Bond 112,000 112,000
Replacement - Toro Groundsmaster 09-4500().{)2 23,000 23,000
Equipment Bond 23,000 23,000
0 Replacement - Trailer 11-4500().{)1 2 9,000 9,000
Equipment Bond 9,000 9,000
Replacement - One Ton Pick Up wlPlow 11-45000..02 2 65,000 65,000
Equipment Bond 65,000 65,000
Park & Rec - Operations Total 99,500 105,500 175,000 40,000 114,000 534,000
IPark & Rec - Projects I
Andover Station North Complex 07-45001-01 385,000 35,000 420,000
Parle Improvement Funds 385,000 35,000 420,000
T enace Park 07-45001-02 55,000 55,000
Pari< Improvement Funds 55,000 55,000
Crooked lake Boat landin9 07-45001-03 125,000 125,000
DNR Grant 62,500 62,500
Parle Improvement Funds 62,500 62,500
Stroobnan Park 07-45001-04 40,000 40,000
Parle Improvement Funds 4/1,000 4/1,000
Annual Miscellaneous Projects 07-45001-99 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Parle ImprolllH/Jent Funds 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Forest Meadows Park 08-45001-01 25,000 25,000
Parle Improvement Funds 25,000 25,000
Sophies South Park 08-45001-02 75,000 75,000
Pari< Improvement Funds 75,000 75,000
Woodland Crossin9 Park 08-45001-03 57,000 57,000
Pari< ImprolllH/Jent Funds 57,000 57,000
0 Andover Lions Park 09-45001-01 85,000 85,000
Parle Improvement Funds 85,000 85,000
Hawkridge Park Improvements 10-45001-01 500,000 500,000
11
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2010 , ro'tal
2009 2011
Park Improvement Funds 500,000 500,000
Prairie Knoll Pari< - Phase III 10-45001-02 150,000 150.0~
Parle Improvement Funds 150,000 150,0
Park & Rec - Projects Total 630,000 217,000 110,000 675,000 25,000 1,657,000
IPlanning & Zoning I
Replacement - Ford Taurus #15 08-41500-01 2 20,000 20,000
Equipment Bond 20,000 20,000
Planning & Zoning Total 20,000 20,000
ISanitary Sewer I
UfI Staion #1 Upgrade 07-48200-01 25,000 25,000
Sewer TlUnk Fund 25,000 25,000
New JetlVac Truck 08-48200-01 300,000 300,000
SanitaJy Sewer Fund 300,000 300,000
Crosstown Blvd Trunk Sewer Une 08-48200-02 400,000 400,000
Sewer TlUnk Fund 400,000 400,000
Yellow Pine UfI Station 09-48200-01 650,000 650,000
Sewer Revenue Bonds 650,000 650,000
Rural Reserve Trunk Sanitary Sewer 10-48200-01 2,250,000 1,250,000 3,500,000
Assessments 250,000 1,000,000 1,250,000
Sewer TlUnk Fund 2.000,000 250,000 2.250,000
Sanitary Sewer Total 25,000 700,000 6SO,000 2,250,000 1,250,000 4,875,000
IStorm Sewer ~ 0
Stonn Sewer Improvements 07-48300-01 50,000 51,000 52,000 53,000 54,000 260,000
Sfomr Sewer Fund 50,000 51,000 52.000 53,000 54,000 260,000
New Track Backhoe 08-48300-01 2 80,000 80,000
Sfomr Sewer Fund 80,000 80,000
Replacement - Elgin Street Sweeper 10-43100-01 150,000 150,000
Sfonn Sewer Fund 150,000 150,000
Storm Sewer Total SO,OOO 131,000 52,000 203,000 54,000 490,000
IStreet Signs ~
Replacement - Sign Truck #410 07-43300-01 2 75,000 75,000
ElJ1lipmenl Bond 75,000 75,000
Radius Master Machine 07-43300-02 8,400 8,400
Capital Projects Levy 8,400 8,400
Street Signs Total 83,400 83,400
IStreets I Highways I
Annual Street Seal Coal Project 07-43100-01 287,632 271,328 480,438 660,377 515,760 2,215,535
ConsfIUcfIon Seal coat Fund 41,965 31,092 116,194 fi,397 14,14$ 328,194
R & B - Crack Seal & Seal Coat 245,661 2,w,236 304,244 594,980 501,614 1,886,741
Annual Street Crack Seal Project 07-43100-02 89,840 98,968 183,390 153,439 152,187 677,824
ConslnJction Seal Coat Fund 9,114 24,498 9,095 1,961 0 44,614
R & B - Craclr Seal & Seal Coat 80,726 74,410 174,295 151,412 152.181 633,1:0
Annual Street Mill and Overlay 07-43100-03 957,970 813,986 915,060 965,670 925,069 4,577,75.
Assessments 239,492 203,498 228,765 241,411 231,261 1,144,431
12
13
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2009 . f
2010 2011 Total
Water Total 55,000 1,340,000 3,175,000 550,000 55,000 5,175,0000
GRAND TOTAL 5,439,842 7,938,799 9,254,888 7,957,486 4,282,016 34,873,031
o
o
14
City of Andover, MN
0 Capital Plan
2007 thru 2011
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
Department 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Central Equipment 250,000 250,000
Community Center 8,000 15,000 23,000
Engineering 399,000 290,000 298,000 351,000 352,000 1,690,000
Facility Management 30,000 1,843,217 1,882,000 341,000 34,000 4,130,217
Pari< & Ree . Operations 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
Pari< & Ree . Projecls 630,000 217,000 110,000 675,000 25,000 1,657,000
Sanitary Sewer 25,000 400,000 650,000 2,250,000 1,250,000 4,575,000
Stonn Sewer 50,000 51,000 52,000 53,000 54,000 260,000
Streets I Highways 3,570,442 2,445,082 2,007,888 2,607,486 2,370,016 13,000,914
Water 55,000 1,340,000 3,175,000 550,000 55,000 5,175,000
GRAND TOTAL 4,807,442 6,626,299 8,464,888 6,882,486 4,180,016 30,961,131
o
o
15
City of Andover, MN
Capital Plan 0
2007 thru 2011
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Source 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Assessmen1s 873,092 331,896 228,765 691,417 1,302,267 3,427,437
Buildin9 Fund 515,217 515,217
Capital Equipment Reserve 242,000 242,000
Capilal Projecls Levy 60,000 43,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 172,000
Community Center Operations 8,000 15,000 23,000
Construction Seal Coat Fund 51,079 55,590 185,289 67,364 14,146 373,468
DNR Grant 62,500 62,500
Federal Funds 488,000 488,000
G.O. Bond 1,250,000 2,100,000 300,000 3,650,000
. General Fund 10,000 57,000 50,000 58,000 50,000 225,000
Municipal State Aid Funds 392,000 945,400 370,000 567,000 643,000 2,917,400
ParK Improvement Funds 567,500 217,000 110,000 675,000 25,000 1,594,500
R & B - Crack Seal & Seal Coat 326,393 314,706 478,539 746,452 653,801 2,519,891
R & B-Overlays 718,478 610,490 686,295 724,253 693,802 3,433,318 0
R & B - Pedestrian Trail 48,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 52,000 250,000
R & B - Reserve 381,300 187,000 59,000 61,000 63,000 751,300
Sewer Revenue Bonds 650,000 650,000
Sewer Trunk Fund 207.000 520,500 124,000 2,150,000 400,000 3,401,500
Stenn Sewer Fund 50,000 51,000 52,000 53,000 54,000 260,000
Traii Funds 210,000 210,000
Water Fund 55,000 63,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 273,000
Water Revenue Bonds 2,950,000 2,950,000
Water Trunk Fund 299,100 1,173,500 299,000 650,000 150,000 2,571,600
GRAND TOTAL 4,807,442 6,626,299 8,464,888 6,882,486 4,180,016 30,961,131
o
16
.
City of Andover, MN
0 Capital Plan
2007 thru 2011
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DE}>ARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
ICentral Equipment I
Canopy lor Fuel Island 09-48800-01 3 250,000 250,000
G.O.Bond 250,000 250,000
Central Equipment Total 250,000 250,000
ICommunity Center I
Carpet - West Side Enhance 07-44000-02 2 8,000 8,000
Conununity Center Operations B,OOO 8,000
Storage Building 10-44000-01 2 15,000 15,000
Community Center Operations 15,000 15,000
Community Center Total 8,000 15,000 23,000
0 IEngineering .
New Development Projects 07-41600-01 351,000 241,000 248,000 300,000 300,000 1,440,000
Sewer TlUnk Fund 175,500 120,500 124,000 lSO,ooo lSO,OOO 720,000
Waler TlUnk Fund 175,SOO 120,500 124,000 150,000 150,000 720,000
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance 07-41600-02 48,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 52,000 250,000
R&B-Pedesf1ianT..n 41,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 52,000 250,000
Engineering Total 399,000 290,000 298,000 351,000 352,000 1,690,000
IFacility Management .
Carpet Replacement 07-41900-01 2 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000
General Fund 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 SO,OOO
Annual ParKing Lot Maintenance 07-41900-02 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 110,000
Capital ProJec1s Levy 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 110,000
Surface Seal all Brick Structures 08-41900-01 40,000 40,000
Capital ProJec1s Levy 22,000 22,000
Water Fund 18,000 18,000
Land Purchase 08-41900-02 515,217 515,217
Building Fund 515,217 515,217
Building A - Seal Roar 08-41900-03 7,000 8,000 15,000
General Fund 7,000 8,OOD 15,000
Salt Storage Building 08-41900-04 350,000 350,000
G.O. Bond 350,000 350,000
Recycling Building & Fence 08-41900-05 250,000 250,000
G.O.Bond 250,000 250,000
Attached Storage Building 08-41900-06 200,000 200,000
o G.O. Bond 200,000 200,000
Fire St. #2 Addition and ParKing Lot Improve. 08-41900-07 2 450,000 450,000
17
Department 2008 2010 .- r
Project# Priority 2007 2009 2011 Total
G.O. Sond 450,000 450,1IDO
Addition to Storage Building & Vehicle Maint Shop 09-41900-01 1,850,000 1,850,00P
G.O. Sond 1,85O,/IIJO 1,850,0
Pedestrian Tunnel Under Crosstown Blvd. 10-41900-01 300,000 300,000
G.O. Sond 300,1IDO 300,000
Facility Management Total 30,000 1,843,217 1,882,000 341,000 34,000 4,130,217
IPark & Rec - Operations I
ReplacelRepair Play Structures - Various Parks 07-45000-01 2 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
Capital Projects Levy 4O,/IIJO 4O,1IDO
General Fund .40,000 4O,IIDO 4O,/IIJO 40,000 160,1IDO
Park & Rec - Operations Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
IPark & Rec - Projects I
Andover Station North Complex 07-45001-01 385,000 35,000 420,000
PIIIt Impro...m.nt Funds 385,000 35,/IIJO 420,1IDO
T enace ParK 07-45001-02 55,000 55,000
Parle Improvemenl Funds 55,1IDO 55~OOO
Crooked Lake Boat Landing 07-45001-03 125,000 125,000
DNR Grant 62,500 62,500
Parle Improvement Funds 62,500 62,500
Strootman ParK 07-45001-04 40,000 40,000
PIIIt Improvement Funds 4O,IIDO 40,000
Annual Miscellaneous Projects 07-45001-99 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
PIIIt Improvement Funds 25,000 25,/IIJO 25,000 25,000 25,000 125'OOP
Forest Meadows ParK 08-45001-01 25,000 25,00
Parle Improvement Funds 25,/IIJO 25,000
Sophies South ParK 08-45001-02 75,000 75,000
Park Improvement Funds 75,000 75,000
Woodland Crossing ParK 08-45001-03 57,000 57,000
PIIIt Improvement Funds 51,000 57,000
Andover Lions ParK 09-45001-01 85,000 85,000
PIIIt Impro"""",nt Funds 85,1IDO 85,000
Hawkridge ParK Improvemenls 10-45001-01 500,000 500,000
Parle Improvement Funds 500,000 500,000
Prairie Knoll ParK - Phase III 10-45001-02 150,000 150,000
.PIIIt Improvement Funds 150,000 150,/IIJO
Park & Rec - Projects Total 630,000 217,000 110,000 675,000 25,000 1,651,000
ISanitary Sewer I
Lilt Staion #1 Upgrade 07-48200-01 25,000 25,000
Sewer Trunk Fund 25,000 25,000
Crosstown Blvd Trunk Sewer Line 08-48200-02 400,000 400,000
Sewer Trunk Fund 4OO,/IIJO 400,000
Yellow Pine Lilt Slation 09-48200-01 650,000 650,000
Sewer Re..lIUe Bonds 6SO,OOO 650,000
Rural Reserve Trunk SanitaIy Sewer 10-48200-01 2,250,000 1,250,000 3,500,000
Assessments 25O,1IDO 1,000,000 1,25O,/IIJO
Sewer Trunk Fund 2,/IIJO,/IIJO 250,000 2,250'00
18
j .
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
0 Sanitary Sewer Total 25,000 400,000 650,000 2,250,000 1,250,000 4,575,000
IStorm Sewer I
Stann Sewer Improvements 07-48300-01 50,000 51,000 52,000 53,000 54,000 260,000
SImm Sewer Fund 50,000 51,000 52,000 53,000 54,000 260,000
Storm Sewer Total 50,000 51,000 52,000 53,000 54,000 260,000
IStreets / Highways I
Annual street Seal Coal Project 07-43100-01 287,632 271,328 480,438 660,377 515,760 2,215,535
ConsIrucfion Seal Coat Fund 41,965 31,092 176,194 65,397 14,146 328,794
R & B - Crack Seal & Seal Coat 245,667 246,236 304,244 594,940 501,614 1,886,741
Annual street Crack Seal Project 07-43100-02 89,840 98,968 183,390 153,439 152,187 677,824
ConsIruc6on Seal Coat Fund 9,114 24,498 9,095 1,967 0 44,674
R &B - Crack Seal & Seal Coat 80,726 74,;f70 174,295 151,m 152, 187 633,150
Annual Street Mm and Overlay 07-43100-03 957,970 813,986 915,060 965,670 925,069 4,577,755
Assessments 239,492 203,496 226,765 241,417 231,267 1,144,437
R&B-Ovetfllf$ 118,;f78 610,490 686,295 724,253 693,802 3,433,318
Annual Pavement Markings 07-43100-04 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 85,000
R&B-Res8l1lll 15,000 16,000 17,000 16,000 19,000 65,000
Annual Curb Replacement 07-43100-05 40,000 41,000 42,000 43,000 44,000 210,000
R & B - ResfllW 46,000 41,000 42,000 43,000 44,000 210,000
Rail Road Quiet Zones 07-43100-08 180,000 130,000 95,000 405,000
Munh;ipel Stele Aid Funds 95,000 95,000
R & B - Res_ 180,000 13/1,000 310,000
0 Municipal State Aid Routes! New & Reconstruct 07-43100-09 1,615,000 898,800 767,000 714,000 3,994,800
Assessments 633,600 126,4IJD 200,000 71,000 1,033,000
Fedflllll Funds 486,000 488,000
Mumclpel Stale Aid Funds 217,000 770,400 567,000 643,000 2,197,4IJD
R & B - ResfllW 146,300 146,300
Sewer TlUnk Fund 6,500 6,500
Water TlUnk Fund 123,600 123,600
Intersection Upgrades 07-43100-10 175,000 175,000 275,000 625,000
Municipal Stele Aid Funds . 175,000 175,000 275,000 625,000
Construct Bikeway! Walkway Corridors 07 -TRAIL-Ol 210,000 210,000
Trail Funds 210,000 210,000
Streets / Highways Total 3,570,442 2,445,082 2,007,888 2,807,486 2,370,016 13,000,914
IWater I
Rehabilitation of Wells 07-48100-01 45,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 245,000
Water Fund 45,0011 45,0011 50,000 50,0110 55,000 245,0110
Sealing of Well #1 07-48100-02 2 10,000 10,000
Water Fund 10,000 10,000
Water Main along Soulh Coon Creek Drive 0848100-01 795,000 795,000
Water TlUnk Fund 795,0011 795,000
Water Tower Painting 08-48100-02 500,000 500,000
Capital cqulpmenl Res_ 242,000 242,000
Water TlUnk Fund 258,0011 . 258,000
Demolish 500,000 Gallon Water Tower 09-48100-01 175,000 175,000
Water TlUnk Fund 175,000 175,0011
0 Construct Water Tower 09-48100-02 2.950,000 2,950,000
Water Revenue Bonds 2,950,0011 2,950,0011
19
Department
WTP Reclaim Tank Addition
Wow Trunk Fund
Water Total
GRAND TOTAL
Project# Priority 2007
10-48100-01
2008
2009
2010
500,000
500,000
550,000
.
2011
4,807,442 6,626,299 8,464,888 6,882,486 4,180,016
55,000
f
Total
500,000
500,0
5,175,000
30,961,131
o
o
55,000 1,340,000 3,175,000
20
.
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-48800-01
Project Name Canopy for Fuel Island
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 20 Yearn
Category Equipment
Priority 3 - Low
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Central Equipment
Description
Relocate the fueling station and install two (2) new 10,000 gallon fuel tanks and possibility keep the 2,000 gallon diesel fuel tank for an alternative
fuel like E85. Also, install a canopy to cover the fuel pumps and Gasboy fuel monitoring equipment.
Justification
The canopy would keep the fuel pumps, gasboy equipment, operators dry and help keep sun, rain and snow damage to a minimum. It would also
keep the fuel in the tanks from getting contaminated. The larger tanks will allow us to have tanker drops of 7,500 gallons of fuel, saving us money
and the frequency of the drops that we now have. The tanks are approximately 18 years old and are warranted for 30 years. The pumps were
installed in 1999 and are in good shape.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
2009
250,000
250,000
2010
2011
Total
250,000
250,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
G.O. Bond
2007
2008
2009
250,000
250,000
2010
2011
Total
250,000
250,000
Total
Operational ImpactJOther I
The larger tanks will allow us to have a tanker drops of7,500 gallons offue~ saving us money and the frequency of the drops that we now have.
.
o
21
Friday, Ociober 27, 2006
>C
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Comm Ctr Manager
Department Community Center
o
Project # 07-44000-02
ProjcctName Carpet - West Side Entrance
Description I
Install carpet tiles inside the west end doors. .
Justification I
The carpet tiles would give the entrance a more finished look. In addition to keeping snow / salt / sand from making it's way down the hall during
the winter months, the tiles can be replaced as they go bad without having to change the entire carpet area.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
8,000
8,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
8,000
8,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Community Center Operations
2007
8,000
8,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
8,000
8,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
It would save staff from having to mop or scrub the entrance area as much. It also would be safer in the winter months due to the concrete floor
getting slippery. We currently have a contract to rent carpet runners in the winter and spring that would no longer be needed.
o
22
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 10-44000-01
Project Name Storage Building
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
. Category Building Construction
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Conun Ctr Manager
Department Community Center
Description
Storage Building f Garage for.future equipment purchases. The building would be added to the north end of the field house using the existing wall
as part of the new structure.
Justification
As the Community Center continues to grow and acquire more recreational equipment, tables, chairs etc., there will be a lack of storage space. We
would only buy equipment if there was a need for it in the field house and if it would help increase rental hours. Some of the equipment would be
rented out to users and create additional revenues.
Expenditures
Construction
2007
2008
2009
2010
15,000
15,000
2011
Total
15,000
15,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Community Center Operations
Total
2007
2008
2009
2010
15,000
15,000
2011
Total
15,000
15,000
Operational Impact/Other
The additional space would provide storage for equipment and would need to have electricity and heal lbis space would free up some space in
what has already become a crowded field house storage room.
o
23
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-41600-01
Project Name New Development Projects
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category New Development Projects
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Engineering
o
. Description
New developments include the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewers and streets. Since the majority of the improvement
projects are being privately installed by the developer, the following expenditures are the city's share for trunk water and sewer improvements.
Note: All private development construction is dependent upon market conditions, plat approval and normal City development procedures.
Justification
The develoment phasing is identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Construction 351,000 241,000 248,000 300,000 300,000 1,440,000
Total 351,000 241,000 248,000 300,000 300,000 1,440,000 0
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Sewer Trunk Fund 175,500 120,500 124,000 150,000 150,000 720,000
Water Trunk Fund 175,500 120,500 124,000 150,000 150,000 720,000
Total 351,000 241,000 248,000 300,000 300,000 1,440,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional maintenance of streets, storm sewer, water main and sanitary sewer will result Additional streets will be added for snowplowing.
o
24
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-41600-02
Project Name Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 20 years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contaet City Engineer
Department Engineering
Description
This project provides maintenance such as patching, crack filling and restoration for the city's pedestrian and park trail system.
Justification
City trails are in need of general maintenance including bituminous patching, crack filling and restoration to maintain the high level of service to
pedestrian walkers, bikers and roller bladers. A 5-year capital improvement plan was prepared for the City to identify and prioritize the necessary
repairs.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Improvement 48,000 49,000 . 50,000 51,000 52,000 250,000
0 Total 48,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 52,000 250,000
Funding Sources
R & B - Pedestrian Trail
2007
48,000
48,000
2008
49,000
49,000
2009
50,000
2010
51,000
51,000
2011
52,000
52,000
Total
250,000
250,000
Total
50,000
Operational ImpactJOther I
As the city trail system begins to age, general maintenance such as bituminous patching, crack filling and restoration becomes a necessity. The
maintenance will allow for a longer service life for the trail system throughout the city.
o
25
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contaet PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
o
Project # 07-41900-01
Project Name Carpet Replacement
Description
The replacement of carpet in appropriate areas of all City buildings where deemed necessary. An annual review of all carpeted areas will be done
to determine the order of replacement
Justification
The buildings get a lot of use and, despite the appropriate cleaning and maintenance, the carpeted areas will need to be replaced.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Facility Maintenance 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000
Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 SO,OOO 0
Funding Sources
General Fund
2007
10,000
10,000
2008
10,000
10,000
2009
10,000
10,000
2010
10,000
10,000
2011
10,000
10,000
Total
50,000
50,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The carpet replacement will be needed in order to keep the buildings in good repair. Due to heavy use, it is anticipated that all carpeted areas will
need to be replaced.
o
26
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-41900-02
Project Name Annual Parking Lot Maintenance
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 10 Yems
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Facility Management
Description
Yearly maintenance of the City parking lots is necessary to extend their useful lives. Parking lots that need maintaining include those at the City
Hall complex, Public Works, Community Center, at City parks, and at the Fire Stations. Yearly maintenance may include crack sealing, seal
coating, and mill and overlays. Maintenance will generally be completed with the street zones, or on an as needed basis.
Justification
Completing periodic maintenance on the City parking lots, similar to City streets, will extend the overall design life of the pavement and reduce
and/or prolong costly repairs.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Improvement 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 110,000
0 Total 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 24,000 110,000
Total
23,000
2011
24,000
24,000
Total
110,000
110,000
Funding Sources
Capital Projects Levy
2007
20,000
20,000
2008
21,000
21,000
2009
22,000
22,000
2010
23,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Maintaining the parking lots will result in less annual maintenance for public works and prolong the life of the pavements.
o
27
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-41900-01
Project Name Surface Seal all Brick Structures
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 5 years
Category Facility Management
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
o
Description
A surface sealing application would be initiated for all brick and/or block municipal buildings. The buildings include: City Hall, Public Works,
Fire Station #1 & #2, Sunshine Park Building, Prairie Knoll Park Building, and all utility department buildings such as the pump houses and
treatment facility.
Justification
This is a necessary maintenance item to ensure the long term integrity of the municipal buildings.
Expenditures
Facility Maintenance
2007
2008
40,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
40,000
Total
40,000
40,000
o
Funding Sources
Capital Projects Levy
Water Fund
2007
2008
22,000
18,000
40,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
22,000
18,000
40,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
This will reduce the amount of long term mainteqance and repair to the municipal buildings.
o
28
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Project #
08-41900-02
Project Name Land Purchase
Description
Purchase land west of the Public Works building to be used for a salt storage building, material storage, recycling center and future facility
expansion. The City's is currently under contract to purchase this property. The City management team will be evaluating and assisting with the
planning and future expansion for the Public Works Facility. Adequate property is necessary to insure that future needs of the community can be
met
Justification
This is the last opportunity to purchase this property and keep city facilities together in one complex. Future site expansion opportunities are
limited without additional property.
Expenditures
Land Acquisition
2007
2008
515,217
515,217
2009
2010
2011
Total
515,217
515,217
o
Total
Funding Sources
Building Fund
2007
2008
515,217
515,217
2009
2010
2011
Total
515,217
515,217
Total
OperationallmpactJOther
Large cost savings in keeping facilities together. Another large savings is having a salt storage area on the property. The recycling center would be
moved away from the parks and this would help maintain cleaner parks on the complex. It would also provide a large storage area for the seal coat
rock, swee ing, etc. 0 en land areas in Andover will soon be a thin of the ast.
o
29
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plah
Project Name: LAND PURCHASE
o
L E G E N D
Right of Way
Q LotslParcels
Water 0
ill Park .
0 City Limits
0 Project Location
N
w.'
s
Location Map
345
690
1,380
.
Feet
30
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, :MN
Project # 08-41900-03
Project Name Building A - Seal Floor
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 2 Years
Category Facility Management
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Description
Apply a sealant to the cement floor in Building A (large garage).
Justification
The cement floor in Building A spalds due to salt and traffic from daily vehicles use. Sealing of the floors should be repeated every 2 years to
retain the integrity of the floor surface. Without this process, the cement floor would deteriorate and would have to be replaced. It is much more
cost effective to perform the maintenance than to replace the entire floor.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Facility Maintenance 7,000 8,000 15,000
0 Total 7,000 8,000 15,000
Funding Sources
General Fund
2007
2008
7,000
7,000
2009
2010
8,000
8,000
2011
Total
15,000
15,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Gives use a much longer life of the cement floor, than having to replace it before its life expectancy is up.
.
o
31
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-41900-04
Project Name Salt Storage Building
2007 thru 2011
c
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Yem +
Category Facility Management
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Description I
This salt storage building would be 40' x 50' x 25' high. The City would be able to purchase a season's worth of salt and keep it stored inside this
structure out of the elements. We would meet all environmental specifications needed for this type of storage, with no damage to the product being
stored. This facility would be built to blend in with the rest of the City complex and not a sight distraction within the campus.
Justification I
At the present time the City purchases salt from ADoka County, which has been done since the City was first adopted. This puts us at the mercy of
the county operations, causing situations such as what time someone will be there to load our trucks, do they have an adequate supply of salt
needed at all times. We have had good working relations with the county, but they also would like to see us be able to store our own winter supply
so they would be able to keep a larger supply of salt for county use. Cost savings is also a large part of having our own storage. We can purchase
product at $10.00 to 15.00 per ton less; plus we wouldn't be paying a 15% administration fee for county personnel services. This building will pay
for itself over a short period of time.
Expenditures
Construction
2007
2008
350,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
350,000
350,000
o
Total
350,000
Funding Sources
G.O. Bond
2007
2008
350,000
350,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
350,000
350,000
Total
Operational ImpactJOther I
Having this building right here on campus will save a great deal of personnel time, trucking, and fuel costs. The salt not used could be returned to
the storage building and not dumped outside where it gets wet and damaged, or becomes an environmental problem.
o
32
Friday, October 27, 2006
,
, .
Capital Plan 2007 thru 2011
0 City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-41900-05
Project Name Recycling Building & Fence
Type Improvement Priority I - High
Useful Life 15-20 Years Contact PW Superintendent
Category Facility Management Department Facility Management
Description I
Move Recycling Center from location on Tower Drive to new location located north of the water treatment facility. A new building that will be
constructed of materials that will best blend in with the rest of the public works campus. This structure will have to be larger than the present one
so more recycled materials can be stored inside and with less chance of the lighter materials blowing out Also need more room for outside storage,
a paved drive surface, completely fenced, better security lighting, and updated security camera's.
Justification I
At the present location we have just plain run out of room! And the recycling center will have to be moved do to it now sits in the foot print of the
new addition of the vehicle storage building. Also as clean as we try to keep this area, it is probably not the best neighbor to the Community Center
and YMCA do to items that blowout of the recycling storage yard. Also it would be best to keep the large trucks off of Tower Drive for safety
reason, due to narrow streets and a lot of pedestrian traffic.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Construction 250,000 250,000
0 Total 250,000 250,000
,
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
G.O. Bond 250,000 250,000
Total 250,000 250,000
Operational ImpactJOther I
In the new location we will most likely be able to keep a closer watch on the area It will still be within the area of the public works so there would
be no extra cost in maintenance of the grounds and with a larger area it will be more customer friendly.
0
33 Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
c
Project # 08-41900-06
Project Name Attached Storage Building
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Facility Management
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Description I .
wee sided attachment building 25' x 50'. Ibis building will be used for small equipment that can be stored in all types of temperature but under a
roof to protect it from the elements. It will also work as screening the facility.
Justification I
Expenditures
Construction
2007
2008
200,000
200,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
200,000
200,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
G.O. Bond
2007
2008
200,000
200,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
200,000
200,000
Total
I ()p<ntkmolJmpoa!""'"
o
34
Friday, October 27. 2006
Capital Plan 2007 thru 2011
Q City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-41900-07
Project Name Fire 81. #2 Addition and Parking Lot Improve.
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Facility Management
Description
The addition of one bay to the apparatus area, the purchase and storage of an auxiliary power generator, and expanding the existing parking lot to
allow for more room and parking space. The project also includes a mill and overlay of the existing parking lots at Station #1 and #2.
Justification
The additional space to the building will allow for all vehicles to be parked in front of an exit door. The firefighters will not have to move a
vehicle in order to get another one out of the building. The additional bay will also make clean up operations after an event much easier. The
firefighters will not have to move vehicles out of the building in order to clean hose and equipment. The additional parking space will provide for
much needed hard surface training area and more vehicle parking. Replacement of the existing parking lots is necessary due to the heavy fire
vehicle traffic.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Equipment 35.000 35.000
0 Improvement 415.000 415.000
Total 450,000 450,000
Funding Sources
G.O. Bond
2007
2008
450,000
450,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
450,000
450,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The additional space will make all fire operations more efficient at this building. Vehicles will not have to be moved in order to get others out and
clean-up will be much easier and faster.
o
35
Friday, October 27. 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-41900-01
Project Name Addition to Storage Building & Vehicle. Maint. Shop
2007 thru 2011
c
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Years +
Category Facility Management.
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Description 1
This is an addition to the present vehicle storage building. It will be added to the north end of the present building and be the same in size, 100' x
250' with a 75' x 140' addition to the northwest side of the new vehicle storage garage for the vehicle maintenance shop. This building will be built
with cement panels to match the present vehicle garage and would screen Public Works operations from the Community CenterlYMCA as
proposed in a joint meeting with the Mayor and City Council.
Justification I
Due to the inCrease of vehicles, equipment and supplies now used by the City of Andover, this vehicle storage building and vehicle maintenance
repair shop is badly needed. It is not cost effective to have vehicles or other equipment stored outside. Minnesota's four seasons are way too hard
On them and it makes for a much cleaner operation. The vehicle maintenance repair shop has been needed for a long time. The area nOW used has
doors that are not wide enough and work areas for the hydraulic hoist are way too small. Also with the amount of equipment nOW maintained by
our staff in the area is much too small to run a completely safe operation.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
2009
1,850,000
1,850,000
2010
2011
Total
1,850,000
Total
1,850,000
o
Funding Sources
G.O. Bond
2007
2008
2009
1,850,000
1,850,000
2010
2011
Total
1,850,000
1,850,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
This will impact the life of the vehicles and other equipment by being stored inside and to house our vehicle maintenance mechanics. Over the
years, the cost savings have been shown when the proper maintenance of our equipment can be implemented. Ibis building will provide a safe,
roductive, and healthy 0 rational area for Ci em 10 ces that will benefit the City of Andover for man years.
o
36
Friday, October 27, 2006
,
Capital Plan 2007 thru 2011
0 City of Andover, :MN
Project # 10-41900-01
Project Name Pedestrian Tunnel Under Crosstown Blvd.
Type Improvement Priority 1 - High
Useful life 30 Years + Contact PW Superintendent
Category Facility Management Department Facility Management
Description I
lbis would be a pedestrian undexpass walkway under Crosstown to accommodate pedestrian traffic from a possible devel
other sports fields on the north side of Crosstown Boulevard that could crossunder Crosstown Boulevard to SWlShine Par
connect to the cities trail system.
Justification I
lbis item was discussed at a Council Workshop with the Public Works Deparnnent Managers February 16th 2006. For safi
for crossing Crosstown Boulevard from a future park and/or future parking lot on the north side of Crosstown Boulevard
South side, or just getting to the city trail system the quickest and safest way will be a pedestrian underpass under Crossto
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Improvement 300,000
0 Total 300,000
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
G.O. Bond 300,000
Total 300,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Connecting of these area's though a trail system, or underpass will only benefit our operational impact. lbis undexpass wi!
. of our personnel and equipment. That is the smaller equipment that now has to cross a very busy street, could also use the
campuses formate works well in holding down operational cost.
0
37
opment of a parking lot or
k Facilities or just
ety and for easy access
to SWlShine Park on the
wn Boulevard.
Total
300,000
300,000
Total
300,000
300,000
I also add to the safety
underpass. Keeping the
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, JvfN
2007 thru 2011
Project # 07-45000-01
Project Name ~eplace/Repair Play Structures - Various Parks
o
Type Improvement
Useful Life I 0 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
Description I
Repair to fall zones and achieve ADA accessibility. Replacement of playground equipment and other major replacements, such as short fences on
ball fields, soccer goals, or any area of play that does not meet safety specifications.
Justification
Old equipment no longer meets ADA requirements, such as entrapments, fall zones or handicap accessibility. Working to bring the parks up to
meet all safety requirements.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Equipment 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 0
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Capital Projects Levy 40,000 40,000
General Fund 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 160,000
Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 .40,000 40,000 200,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Less maintenance and will meet all safety requirements.
o
38
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-45001-01
ProjectName Andover Station North Complex
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Years +
Category Park Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description
Continued development and construction of an Athletic/Park Complex south of the WDE site. With the fields due to be completed in the fall of
2006; bleachers and playground equipment will be necessary. In order to maximize the usage of the fields, lighting of the two larger fields is
necessary with the possibility of lighting the third and smaller field.
2007 - $20,000 for 3 sets of bleachers, $65,000 for playground equipment and $300,000 to light the 2 larger fields and possibly the smaller field.
2008 - $35,000 for playground equipment
Note: Parkin would be shared with the businesses.
Justification
The bleachers are necessary to allow the spectators to enjoy watching the games without baving to stand for long periods of time. The playground
equipment will allow families with children not playing baseball the opportunity to enjoy another activity. The lighting of the fields allows
additional games and practices to be played during the evenings.
o
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
385,000
Total 385,000
2008
35,000
35,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
420,000
420,000
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
385,000
385,000
2008
35,000
35,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
420,000
420,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
Routine maintenance will be required to upkeep the field and park.
o
39
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
?,NDbVE~
Project Name: BALL FIELD FACILITY
SOUTH OF THE WDE
.
~/ 7~~
~~~ ~~, t
~ <t-~ ~s~~~ 1. .1..1 J::O
R~SW-"'"N - ~ b ~~- -j{El'Is~~~:F
~:-illows,,\ V I FST-~~I~
~~ 142NDAVE .4_QD~
~ ~t~~~ I l/
~ '~~<;'b~~-~(
,,-;-"";;"',,';^~ ~ ,
IrTt '-' o/,;"~",, '-r
W l"'I,fll
~,V >:EJS~JJN
ESTAlES:5TIi"\
l..u'miTIoN
\
I .-
k1:"\H LI\ _
;::7 -L ~ .
_ _:x ~
- - - (&S, / .---- ~.PA.R.I;:SIDE
-_ _I--E! - AT
_ I--- ~ If- n~^n--
_ _ "''----''. IV. ."'",'^' ,
_ ~~-, w
-:::= -~ - ~~ - (,-~
--- _ ~ 'REP 9AK~::::! _ I I~--,H---
.--r ~ MANORI IL _II
~~b - 1/
21-- r 139TH AVE
f _ ____ \ II 1 1/11
o '01 r-- - II I IrT
\ "'~ = ANDOVER
I I - - SI-'\.TION
NORTIi
r--
"'"
-
./
-- -----
- - ---,
,IH,
-_I I II
=fA<<\V
- '\ \ "\~I-
-"\ ~D9."..Krf'~-
'" "1 1'1 Ivl"-NOR-
I ~ ..y>1(
LEGEND
o City Limits
~ Water
lID Park
Q Lots/Parcels
GJ Project Location
N
w.'
s
o
,
340 680
Feet
40
~
,~
,
"-0
~
t:i
>-
o
Z VI142N 1<lE ~
~ L-
ZI-.. ~
<(1"-'
:t:w ---
~
i
~
~
~
~.....
-,
=-
-
- -
-
=1-
=1
=:jf-
\71
Cl
~
!l)
z
o
CJ)
z
<(
::c
-
......--
/
-
Location Map
~5Z~~~ ~ fli)W 0
~" ," ~i;T\L L-... '1,-4-
'11:;1; I, ~~'IJ:, _
, t> i>.;'"" ....
.~/'t' -~fL ~
~.L ~
'T ~ ~
~\
1,360
.
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Project #
07-45001-02
Project Name Terrace Park
Description
Install new basketball court and parking lot with concrete curb and gutter along with completing a small section of trail to provide access to the
playground equipment and the other portions of the park.
Justification
The existing parking lot is currently gravel. Since this is located in an urban area, the parking lot should be paved and the neighborhood residents
have requested a basketball court Also, the trail to the playground area needs to be paved.
Ibis project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
55,000
55,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
55,000
55,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
55,000
55,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
55,000
55,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additionallong-tenn maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
o
41
Fridoy, October 27, 2006
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: TERRACE PARK
o
L E G E N 0
Right of Way
Q LotslParcels
Water 0
d Park ,
Si;
tG City Limits
(iI Project Location
N
'.'
s
Location Map
310
620
1,240
,
Feet
42
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-45001-03
Project Name. Crooked Lake Boat Landing
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description I
Construct new parking lot, install new dock and dredge boat landing area. This project will go forward with the assistance of a MN DNR Matching
Grant
.
Justification I
The eXisting parking lot is beyond its normal maintenance requirements. Surface has deteriorated and a nwnber of pot holes have been filled up to
this point A boat dock is necessary for individuals launching their boat Also, the boat landing has silted in and needs to be removed to allow
boats to maneuver.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
125,000
125,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
125,000
125,000
--
Total
Funding Sources
DNR Grant
Park Improvement Funds
2007
62,500
62,500
125,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
62,500
62,500
125,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Normal maintenance (sealcoating, striping, etc.) will be necessary.
o
43
Friday, October 27, 2006
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: CROOKED LAKE BOAT LANDING
o
o
~.<<'..<..'
~
dI
Q
LEGEND
City Limits
Water
Park
Lots/Parcels
Right of Way
o
,
GI Project Location
N
w.'
s
Location Map
310 620
1,240
.
Feet
44
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-45001-04
Project Name Strootman Park
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description
Reconstruct existing ballfield and replace fencing. The ballfield will be reduced in size for players generally under the age of 12. In addition, there
will not be an outfield fence so the field can be used for other sports as well.
Justification
Current ballfield fencing does not meet League of MN Cities guidelines and needs to be replaced.
Tbis project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
40,000
40,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
40,000
40,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Pari< Improvement Funds
2007
40,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
40,000
Operational Impact/Other
ormal maintenance will be necessary.
o
45
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: STROOTMAN PARK
o
AND(>VER
'~'EST
LEGEND
N
..'
s
Location Map
o City Limits
~ Water
d Park
'i/
Q LotslParcels
Right of Way
o Project Location
o
.
495 990
1,980
.
Feel
46
..
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Project #
01-45001-99
Project Name Annual Miscellaneous Projects
Type Improvement
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Pmk Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description I
This is for unforeseen or requested miscellaneous projects that may arise during the year, requested by the public, staff; City Council or the Parks
and Recreation Commission for each year.
.
Justification I
This gives flexibility to the City to do certain small-sized projects that may be warranted; for example, purchase of soccer goals.
This funding has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Improvement 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
0 Total 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
25,000
25,000
2008
25,000
25,000
2009
25,000
25,000
2010
25,000
25,000
2011
25,000
25,000
Total
125,000
125,000
Total
Operational ImpactlOther I
Allows the Park and Recreation Commission to address a variety of different needs throughout the year.
o
47
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
o
Project #
08-45001-01
Type Improvement
Useful Life IS Years
Category Parle Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Parle & Rec - Projects
Project Name Forest Meadows Park
Description
Install additional playground equipment for 2-5 year old users.
Justification
I
lbis funding has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
25,000
25,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
25,000
25,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
2008
25,000
25,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
25,000
25,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additionallong-tenn maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
o
48
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: FOREST MEADOWS PARK
ADD
LEGEND
10 city Limits
~ Water
dI Park
Q LotslParcels
Right of Way
t:iI Project Location
N
w.'
s
Location Map
o
.
1,800
.
450 900
Feet
49
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-45001-02
Project Name Sophies South Park
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful life IS Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
o
Description
Install new playground equipment and basketball court. The park was dedicated as part of the development of Sophies South. Since no park exists
within the general area, it was recommended to begin developing the park.
Justification
I
Ibis funding has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
75,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
75,000
75,000
o
Total
75,000
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
2008
75,000
75,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
75,000
75,0011
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional long-term maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
o
50
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: SOPHIE'S SOUTH PARK
LEGEND
N
w.'
s
Location Map
o City Limits
~ Water
. Park
Q Lots/Parcels
o
.
220 440
880 .
.
Feet
Right of Way
51
o Project Location
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Parle Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
o
Projeet# 08-45001-03
Project Name Woodland Crossing Park
Description
Install new playground equipment
Justification
The park will have a new basketball court and shelter built in 2006. To complete the park, new playground equipment is necessary for all ages
from 2 - 12 years old..
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
57,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
57,000
Total
57,000
57,000
o
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
2008
57,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
57,000
57,000
Total
57,000
OperationallmpactlOther I
Additionallong-tenn maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
o
52
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
~J4DbVE~
I~
II
I~
-
-
Project Name: WOODLAND CROSSINGS
.~
CO . I ___
Z PRAIRIE
i~J\
I
......
~
/;,"J~,\/
N
"-
I-
~PiL Cf)
l-
E w
z
z
:J
I-
Cf)
r:t:
W
W
o
...J
...J
::.::
...
~
H LN
S~~T'k
I I I
GLEN
I
I I 1/ I I
'l:\f-i "1-1 r
D
f2flti)
~ GREY OAK'S?
LEGEND
)Q
~
~
dI
Q
(;I
City Limits
Water
Park
LotslParcels
Project Location
~~
'Q~p~:j
~(J)':I h<:,;\~;' ~"'\
C~~;:>;:> v V
...,
_ 1!)Q 1= A\I~
l eHE
r--+CO
\ ~
T~
.-f /
-
.
~571\-1C\~
JJ
7$,.>
'>:/y
('It
~
~
N
'.'
S
-l__f-l
Location Map
o
,
940
.
. ,~-~bKv
r'f~{"- vf ~ ~ I f,
l;[" I , . f-- , ,
" ~ M ~. 1, -
~ r~~ ~~L~:~~
~g L , I ~
~~1 '~.fi
~~ h\
235 470
Feet
53
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-45001-01
Project Name Andover Lions Park
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Parle Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
o
Description I
Install outfield fencing with mow strips for ballfield and install new irrigation system.
8 foot high fencing with mow strips - $35,000 and irrigate existing bal1field - $50,000.
Justification I
The installation of an outfield fence will allow the ball to stay in play and also give the awesome feeling when a ball is hit for a home run. Also
give the players a safer playing surface by installing a irrigation system.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2097
2008
2009
85,000
85,000
2010
2011
Total
85,000
85,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
2008
2009
85,000
2010
2011
Total
85,000
Total
85,000
85,000
Operational ImpactiOther I
Additional long-term maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
.
o
54
Friday, October 27, 2006
C2\CITY OF ~
..N ~NDOVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANDOVER LIONS PARK
.
II-r~
r --r:'~\,-\\)G~!i
f---f---t.?l-ll~\) I-
c,~C0 . I-
- 01 1<"'~~JIr-
"" "'~\)\)\ ~lJJ-
'- --- -
-
-
~~~
~~WN
I
',UI,' 'E
<---
'-
A'
-
r IlVk~1( r I I
I I 'W"F~PE~G I
~~ ACRE
f-L. I I I
' \
1/
~ d/;
T .0'i-l2
./ I ' ,,,,-,J-_
~ ;V~ .~ I
r-- '-- 'L';I'';:'~_
!~'i~i)- ~ ,. 0
iT I
" U:;.! I -'1>\)_
}---/:-
- L{s-~
- -
- t".' -
- -
rr=r \3"-\ ' f-- I---.
1;,. \ -
I ,r::
.
,1"
~~
~S-\
*::~\)
"'~(
r .<<-"<-
C<':-L
I-- _
"---
f-- _
.---"-- -
~ 11--'-- -
,1\-\
,..J..
'$
LEGEND
N
w.'
s
Location Map
~ City Limits
~ Water
d Park
Q LotslParcels
Right of Way
o Project Location
o
.
415 830
1,660
.
~~ ~H rJ~ ~f K. .,~
~n d= ~ ,,"j
"" ,,'~~' , ~
~ I m jllli 1f'1' ~
)-~~L ~'"~
~L c8!
'1 'SO ~
Feet
55
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority. 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
o
Project # 10-45001-01
Project Name Hawkridge Park Improvements
Description
The project includes the construction of a warming house, construction of a well w/pump and controls, installation of irrigation for the soccer and
ball fields, playground equipment for children 2-5 years of age and bleachers for sporting spectators.
Storage buildinglbathrooms/concessions - $209,000; drill well with pump & controls - $100,000; septic system - $7,500; pave existing parking
lot - $90,000; irrigation for 2 fields - $50,000; playground Equipment (2-5 year olds) - $25,000; bleachers with concrete pads(soccer &
ballfield) - $15,000; securi li t - $2,500; ark sign e and landsca ing - $1,000. .
Justification
By continuing to improve the park system in Andover, the City provides a high quality parks and recreation complex to meet the growing needs of
an active community. These improvements will provide high quality athletic and recreational opportunities to the residents. A warming house
provides shelter and a restroom facility that can be used year around. The well and irrigation provide for a high quality athletic swface for soccer,
baseball/softball activities and water for the restroom. Playground equipment provides activities for younger children and bleachers provide a safe
and comfortable place for spectators.
1bis roO ect has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures 2007 2008
Improvement
2009
2010
500,000
500,000
2011
Total
500,000
500,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
2008
2009
2010
500,000
500,000
2011
Total
500,000
Total
500,000
Operational Impact/Other
The construction of a warming house and restroom facility will increase the use and enjoyment of the park. Also, the construction of the
storage/warming house/restroom facility will eliminate the need to rent a portable warming house and portable bathroom. The well construction
will give the ability to ice the rinks from the on-site well and will eliminate the need to "tanker" water to the site from the Public Works facility on
Crosstown Blvd. The la ound ui ment will re uire additional Ion -term maintenance and ultimate re lacement will be neces
o
56
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: HAWKRIDGE PARK
LEGEND
o City Limits
~ Water
d1 Park
(;] LotslParcels
Right of Way
o Project Location
N
'.'
s
Location Map
VERDIN
ACRES
o
.
370 740
1,480
.
Feet
57
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
.
o
Project # 10-45001-02
Project Name Prairie Knoll Park - Phase ill
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description
20] 0 - The parking lot would be paved including concrete curb and gutter ($]50,000).
Justification
Prairie Knoll Park is considered a regional city park and completion would bring it into coinpliance with City standards due to the increased use by
the associations for both soccer and football.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
2009
2010
150,000
2011
Total
150,000
150,000
o
Total
150,000
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2007
2008
2009
2010
150,000
150,000
2011
Total
150,000
150,000
Total
OperationallmpactlOther I
Additional long-term maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
o
58
Friday, October 27, 2006
CITY OF
NDOVE
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: PRAIRIE KNOLL PARK
PHASE III
o
~
~
~
Q
City Limits
Water
Park
N
w.'
s
Location Map
Lots/Parcels
o
.
337.5 675
1,350
,
LEGEND
Right of Way
o Project Location
Feet
59
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement'
Useful Life 15-20 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Sanitary Sewer
o
Project # 07-48200-01
ProjectName Lift Staion #1 Upgrade
Description
Adding a permanent natural gas generator to this site as was done to lift station #4.
Justification
This lift station is the most active lift station currently in use. When it was designed it was only to be a temporary lift station, but those plans have
since changed. Over the past few years there have been many power outages of which some have required tempoary power to keep it in operation
to avoid backups into the homes. A permanent generator at this site would be in every ones best interests.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
25,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
25,000
Total
25,000
25,000
o
Funding Sources
Sewer Trunk Fund
2007
25,000
25,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
25,000
25,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
There would be a time savings by not having to get tempoary service to this site. It takes two employee's about an hour and a half to get to the site
and hooked up for operations, There will be some operational impacts for maintenance and the cost of natural gas. There will be a maintenance
contract with the supplier to make sure the generator is always in full operation.
o
60
Friday, October 27, 2006
;-
, , Capital Improvement Plan
f~NDbVE~
Project Name: LIFT STATION #1 IMPROVEMENTS
I ~~~ )/
I
I
I z:
~
. ~
~
147:TH ft;. v'E p# 45T/
/ I \ \
I. s \ IJ
~ ~ I ;;
I ~i:'C3 , ~~~
~~.iJ.p ,-N~ 1 R-H Il\''-:
. I'ff.8
, ',< ~ I c . \~ \ . ~) JJ84D
""" -CL O~:t-~ S
-; g f--~- ~l I \';: 1?OUlvD 1.;
I IJ ): <
~ n 1/1 1> ~
m /1<!'Olt LN ;::: ~
)/ I~ u 1',--
/-- ~ / ~-
J. .--J, 1 ,n
D 7
~
~'--'l n AVt -r--
. =~ ~\ DL~ '-
[qJ Aimi
44 H l \I N /
<(
/ DEHN.S d~~JD \ r--
-~ -
-
---- \ \ \
---
I c::::
I 0
/1 I
N Location Map
w.'
LEGEND rn ~="~~ K ~
0 City Lirn its ~~' "'1'#" 1 "
S I "~- ,/t
>~ Water ~ d, ~. - ' "
?4 I' !J i ~':1:
d Park 0 295 590 1,180 't~, ~
Q Lots/Parcels , . ~. R ~
(iI Feet
Project Location 61 ..g
. Lift Stations -~\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Sanitary Sewer
o
Project # 08-48200-02
Project Name Crosstown Blvd Trunk Sewer Line
Description
Extend sanitary sewer trunk along Crosstown Boulevard from the railroad tracks east to Prairie Road. It will be necessary to jack the sanitary
sewer underneath the railroad.
Justification
The trunk sanitary sewer will be extended to serve properties adjacent to CrosstoWn Boulevard and east of Prairie Road. The extension has been
recommended through the sanitary sewer report (2~04 Sanitary Sewer Report).
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
400,000
400,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
400,000
400,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Sewer Trunk Fund
2007
2008
400,000
400,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
400,000
400,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional routine maintenance including televising and cleaning will be required.
o
62
Friday, October 27, 2006
y'NDbVE~ Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: CROSSTOWN BLVD SEWER LINE 2008
Ll "'-
- I-- - ~<O ~0
- I-- - ~
I-
- f-- ---: ~ eJ '"
),
- I-- J. r---1 r--
- I-- . 0m Ilt ;=
~
I---
-
f
\ -
-
/ -
iIII "= --
!II' -
'e,
f-- -
f-- -
f-- I J PN ~
c---,
~,\--
I) .
!'ii'!,( f .. .~
/
t--
3,' m .p; \,..; ~
r - .......
.
N Location Map
w.'
LEGEND "''' i'J.'lnj 1<', ~
Right of Way ("" ,. ~ ~ 1 -
s '" JoI RP- ,1'
1:)0 LotslParcels
Water 0 405 810 1,620
~ Park . , q, ~
0 Feet
City Limits 63 ~ ..i
(iJ Project Location ~
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-48200-01
Project Name YeUow Pine Lift Station
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Sanitary Sewer
o
Description
Install a lift station at Yellow Pine Street to divert flow from the Bluebird Street trunk line to the Pinewood trunk line. The wet well for this lift
station was constructed in 2005 as a part of the Crosstown Boulevard Improvements Project.
Justification
This lift station will allow additional capacity in the Bluebird Street trunk line to serve adjacent properties until the year 2020.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
2009
650,000
650,000
2010
2011
Total
650,000
650,000
o
Total
Funding Sources 2007
Sewer Revenue Bonds
2008
2009
650,000
650,000
2010
2011
Total
650,000
650,000
Total
OperationallmpactlOther I
Routine monitoring and maintenance of the lift station will be reqlrired.
.
o
64
Friday, October 27, 2006
I, .
.V~bVE~
F~
II II
'} "',$ ~
g 0 ,>-C:J
I I I I
_ III rr
-
~ -
~/
./
II
1\
i:?I " I- _
1\ \ "
I
l>
.
1111111111
II1I I I I mr
LEGEND
Right of Way
)0
d Park
o
(iI
LotslParcels
Water
o
,
City Limits
Project Location
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: YELLOW PINE LIFT STATION .
( ~~~
~ /1\YiJ;~ ~ /
-17T ~ ~ Vi /
~ ~ :\ ~ ~
Tr-'~ v - \ JJ / l \ / I
~'i/"-/ / N....--r
r-
'-- '- I
--I---' ~~
--
~'-
.
v
~
-
~
\
1\ ""~
,
If
II
~~ /
~N~~/~
~
-
-
~
-
r \ / 'r---
II
";
N
..'
s
Location Map
625 1,250
~~.~~m Ji ~ fi -,~
Lln '" I": ~~k J.,"j
-, I ;;j; ~ 'llS Ii"'!' !llk
2,500. . ~ t:;\-- ~,
. ~k_ ~
~
Feet
65
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Project # 10-48200-01
Project Name Rural Reserve Trunk Sanitary Sewer
o
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Yems
Category Unassigned
Priority 1 - High
Contact
Department Sanitary Sewer
Description I
Extension of trunk sanitary sewer from Bunker Lake Boulevard approximately parallel to Coon Crook to serve the Rural Reserve area. The
sanitary sewer will be constructed through existing neighborhoods and along South Coon Creek Drive then north into the Rural Reserve Area. It is
anticipated that the extension through the Rural Reserve may be constructed the following year, or as the market demands. .
Justification
I
The trunk sanitary sewer will be extended to serve future development of the Rural Reserve. The timing of this extension will be market driven
based upon developer' timelines for the Rural Reserve. The extension has been recommended in the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Analysis for Designated
Rural Reserve Areas prepared by WSB and Associates.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Construction 2,250,000 1,250,000 3,500,000
Total 2,250,000 1,250,000 3,500,000 0
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Assessments 250,000 1,000,000 1,250,000
Sewer Trunk Fund 2,000,000 250,000 2,250,000
Total 2,250,000 1,250,000 3,500,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional routine maintenance including televising and cleaning will be required.
o
66
Friday, October 27, 2006
-:-----
~ I
, .
09&>bVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: RURAL RESERVE
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
irW. ~I~~ I .~
~~~ ',':nf,:/
~~et7my- I ~\-- - ~EE. ~h
~~ ~~:"" i=8~
I~ \v ~ ~ITE;tjJ
I
II~ ~I /
I~ ~r u.
~~~~
1 1 '-.,.,:Vr ~_ n. ~IIIIIIIIIII
, I c. FfJ" ',Iii ~.. - ::;;
h.'N"'~11r _' ~~ ~
kffitMaWfm ~ ~ _I~ \\~9iIIE~ITA ~ B 0 T~f I
.~, ;:M:w~
T ~~&~ll' ~ ~ lG! l{
s LJn. I. ~I;-. ."f
~1,!j1: -" '" }, ,
~ 1r J'; ~~h,L
~.~ ~ ~Jlh~
, [ ur
~
.:8
II
:: I
, ~~ ~ .111
r' hI> CiE'~'I/11 Jl[[ b//~ ~ IB ~I
L IUI \~ ~~.. .1. 1
- ~ :j~~' ,,"o~b i~~
9/s:la.,
..
r1111 I 'd 1./ I . f---1--1
~ II 1IIIIhlTTl I I
~Ii~~ i
- IOlllTI\ " 1 "'.1
- II- >;!, ;J
-d ~ ~~ ~II~ z
~~E58
\ IT.
E _I l~~'
~I I~
r-,Iili~
II'
~
~
-
-
LEGEND
., Q Lots/Parcels
Water
iI Park
to City Limits
o Project Location
o
,
1,850
3,700
7,400
,
Feet
67
..fi
)r-..\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Years +
Category Utilities
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Storm Sewer
o
Projeet #
Project Name
.
07-48300-01
Storm Sewer Improvements
Description
Each year, areas of the City are identified where improvements are required to maintain our storm sewer system. Maintenance items include
replacement offailing culverts, catch basins, and storm sewer pipes, erosion issues at storm sewer outfalls, and dredging of ponds and ditches.
2007 - Repair failing culvert and patch street on l4lstAve in Smith's Green Acres
2008 - F.E.S. Repair in Meadowood Addition at I 48th and Makah St
2009 - Pond outlet in North Valley Rid e
Justification I
Maintaining the City's storm sewer system improves water quality, improves public safety, and reduces the need for costly repairs in the future.
Repairing and maintaining these systems also allows public works to focus on and comply with requirements of the NPDES program, such as pipe
cleaning, inspections, and sweeping.
Expenditures
Construction
2007
SO,OOO
so,ooo
2008
51,000
51,000
2009
52,000
52,000
2010
53,000
53,000
2011
54,000
54,000
Total
260,000
260,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Storm Sewer Fund
2007
50,000
SO,OOO
2008
51,000
51,000
2009
52,000
52,000
2010
53,000
53,000
2011
54,000
54,000
Total
260,000
260,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Repiliring problem areas in the storm sewer system will reduce the yearly maintenance needs placed on the public works personnel.
o
68
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: REPAIR AT 141 ST AVE IN SMITH'S GREEN ACRES
LEGEND
o City Limits
~ Water
d Park
Q Lots/Parcels
N
w.'
s
Location Map
o
,
140 280
560
,
Right of Way
Feel
o Project Location
69
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 7 Years
Category Streets/Highways
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
o
Project # 07-43100-01
Project Name Annual Street Seal Coat Project
Description
lbis project provides for a seal coat of the streets in the following maintenance zones:
2007 - Zone 5
2008 - Zone 6
2009 - Zone 7
2010 - Zone 8 and 9
2011 - Zone I
Justification
Seal coating will extend the useful life of roads by protecting the bituminous from oxidation due to adverse weather conditions (sun, rain, wind,
snow, etc.). The prevention of oxidation will prolong the useful life of the pavement and defer the need for a costly reconstruction. Seal coating
also improves the skid resistance of the roadway surface by increasing the friction between vehicle tires and the roadway.
New developments requiring seal coating are not shown on the attached maps.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Construction 287,632 271,328 480,438 660,377 515,760 2,215,535
Total 287,632 271,328 480,438 660,377 515,760 2,215,535
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Construction Seal Coat Fund 41,965 31,092 176,194 65,397 14,146 328,794
R & B - Crack Seal & Seal Coa 245,667 240,236 304,244 594,980 501,614 1,886,741
Total 287,632 271,328 480,438 660,377 515,760 2,215,535
Operational Impact/Other I
Extending the life of the street will reduce routine maintenance (Crack sealing, pot hole patching, overlays, etc.) and extend the overall design life
of the pavement
o
70
Friday, October 27, 2006
'~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2007 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 5
,='::]
I-
'--- -
fll
-.I [L
...L,
Ir-_-~f
'1 c- ~i
.\ \
~
V
-" U
u~
-
-
-111111111
f- --j I
'~m~',,,,~~o,, ,.,._.,.,"'","',,,""""'=......._,,'","',"",.,,.,'""' ...,
1"-
f-I/
\- _1--
J
IF
.-
.=
;0__
n
j /
'.-LI ...J...~
'= I I I.. I
~ I ... j. ~ -' c-- \ \ ~
F~~h'- 1---' ~,,.<~,'I,"\iF
l I I :I::~~
rTT clL Ilnl '-
'" 4-1- n r / I I l _ rejl--
!- ttEB~ Jt: I i-rI t f-L-
c- DII' I )~
~~ ITD I I
1 I /I I II
n I I I I
I
~. I
~\:/ / II~~ ~)f
\/J
~C
.
t--
l../;.-
/",-1/
4~
~ ,{*=
'?S: ~
-- ~ -~ ~
, fI y'l..--
~ ~ r 7"
r--
-<:?T"
.~
~ 7
r- n- I
.
.
I
/........... ,
-
~"'~Fr'iT.~
~ ~~ ~8'}- :;-
[)(}- / ' \\1
'. 111111, l )
f-~8J!- Ll rlT\ II I
fI / ' LU..J
If" LL
~
~
;::
l-
t-
" ::::
I S'
~
~Ji
f ~.
--1J
I
I" -L
//
\ H!,!t
~
B.\777 '\
L E G E N D N
...
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels s
~ Water
2,400 1,200 0 2,400
riB Park Feet
0 City Limits
(iJ Project Location
Location Map
,-/~ ~& -'"'~ ~ ~-1\ V
(~ "Vfi ':-::3 ~ r
~n 1",!'3 ~;- ,1'
, ~,i ~
~.$
"'\
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2008 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 6
t-If-
. ~= u u~.
I-
_L
I
I-
I-oL 1,-
I*;""'W
tt: /Ie I.
n
II- ~ LJ 1:-
.. (..1\ I. Ir-/~
V ~
X:-i
7'
I--
I ;, ,'- n
-
- f-- -
~
}l:
9'"
io+ r \ ~
IA
~
I
II
~ )
1-
J-:;
~
~ iII.1)
~ =<:: '/
f-
~ 6:=
-hi
I II T
r-
-
:J
'F
~
I
- --
"I'1'T 1 1'" "T. I r
WL- '-
(~
u
r
~ .r I -
w ~t:'l-
~
.AWARb) - f--- J:lJ
"'UAJl'~
, I='
- [:G
5!:!n:: .;.~
::::::::r-
/L
D ~\D
/!"r' \\.
,
'rz' -
:d~
rH 1 ~
!9
-
( ==
.b PI
W. _
c: ~~
\
'\ D I
:--'"
(
1:1#--1 TI
~ 1 I
I ~J.....
N Location Map
w+ ~,,*'~~ '~
~, trl f-" ~ f-.
s tr; I L ~ ~t- l'
4,400 2,200 0 4,400 ~"~ -f f11
Feet (
~ g ~ ' r~
..l!
>r-..\
LEGEND
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels
~ Water
III Park
o City Limits
(II Project Location
12
. S'\NDbVE~
I 1
l J )
I
-11
~ : ~~~
-l
LEGEND
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels
.. Water
III Park
o City Limits
(II Project Location
\
'ff
\'"
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2009 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 7
//
~
::::::
~
e---
~Q 1
-1~ ,,~D ~--"'
~~ D
of::::! ff I
\1111 III
=I-LII
11/
Qr\ "
1,750
I
I
'1
-.~-
, gm
..."
s
875 0
Feel
-
~ ~
!I!
./
~
I--
Q'lll
II b=-
E
'fa =
j(/-' /~l
~-
V77~
1"
=Ii}-
C:>
-,- :--
I
~,'
~.
Location Map
1,750
r/N- ~ ~t, .-{~
((~"~~~ f,
I.., In ,./ R;z-U;t- ,"I
d ~::~" ~
.~~lfiS
~,$}~> UI
Ji
lr-.-\
{!--
-r-
1~
""'==
t
f...m
Sl\NDbVE~
I
c=
:- :3:
-
~
1:
11-1
"1
-.J..
/llTIT1
I
.S\
21
:;c
rr.)
~
,j
-
;=J=
'11
-
-
r
11
~
11=
LEGEND
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels
.. Water
III Park
o City Limits
G1 Project Location
m
"I
1
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2010 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 8
I
'"
I
/
'&1
;.
r--
/,I~'~Gi
fl/i)'
I///. -... /. m~~f~~-
::::::: trrHI~
I:?:; 7 ~J
'I:::
~
:;:
..'
s
2,000 1,000 0
Feet
J.Ui IIIIII
2,000
74
~- ,
-
"
-
",-
I I
I-
-
-e-
-
eaQN.~ EK
I "
~
~;::8
~
~'
Location Map
r/N-~ ~~ ~r:tJ
\C~r-~~ ~ "
Gin I" R~
~,=11 ).. ~=- "
~ 1'IJS "r.=.1I!!.I..:i..-r
~-;l-~J "li~ Jbt
~
~~
IC
(
c
. S1\NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2011 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 9
11 R I I I ~ I I I 1
.. I r'l Il-
I JLL LLL.J // ~
.~ \ ==
-t 77 11-- ~
'\1 l ..::J. II \ '" I ;:
'-
I I -"" . - ::
I / ~ l" ~~ =0.
k] -, - L
n I 1 - -I IT ijf'~
~ I I r
\~ I I
- . g ~~--4V I
YW
~ \-Jr= I \IT III
~- / q; 1""- I II I 1=1-:0
\\ ~; l~lr I I ~
r1 tl I .. I T ::z;:;:
V - ~
1bI l- I " I /
.",,<- L.-,. I "'- :=J
/
I ..
I ! ~~.-j..]
EEt \
RElIIJ/tiI *1 I I / ~.
liJ I
mmwll = I
L'AfgS lil11
- I
- 11t . "'" /
b-...
~~ I -J
\ r-
~ \Q\.~ I L I U I ~r'"
co ,~,bHi\
H} ~~~~,. ~
L E G E N D N Location Map
,+,
Right of Way ~~ ~~ :r(~
Q Lots/Parcels t~" <l' ~ ~ I)
s "" L ~[JL- ,
~ ~ ~ ~
Water ~~ l!;:b.b/ LL
2,200 1,100 0 2,200
dJ Park Feet ;;i at! ~~, 'l!! l.lb.{-
0 City Limits ',~
;;, .1i
(i1 Project Location ~\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 7 Years
Category Streets/Higbways
Priority 1 - High
Coutact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
o
Project # 07-43100-02
Project Name Annual Street Crack Seal Project
Description
The project provides for sealing of the street cracks in the following maintenance zones:
2007 - Zone 6
2008 - Zone 7
2009 - Zone 8 and 9
2010 - Zone 1
2011 - Zone 2
Justification
The sealing of street cracks will significantly extend the useful life of the streets. This will extend the time frame when a costly street
reconstruct.ion project will be necessary. The sealing of cracks in the street surface reduces/eliminates water from entering the road base and
subgrade. This process reduces the freezelthaw cycles of the subgrnde, maintaining the integrity of the road. Crack sealing is completed in a
particular zone one year prior to seal coating. This allows the crack sealing material to cure and minimize bleed through once seal coated.
Expenditures
Construction
2007
89,840
2008
98,968
98,968
2009
183,390
183,390
2010
153,439
153,439
2011
152,187
152,187
Total
677,824
677,824
o
Total
89,840
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Construction Seal Coat Fund 9,114 24,498 9,095 1,967 0 44,674
R & B - Crack Seal & Seal Coa 80,726 74,470 174,295 151,472 152,187 833,150
Total 89,840 98,968 183,390 153,439 152,187 677,824
Operational Impact/Other I .
Sealing the street cracks will reduce routine maintenance by eliminating the source of degradation resulting from moisture in the road subgrnde.
o
76
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET CRACK SEAL PROJECT
2007 STREET CRACK SEAL, ZONE 6
. ~NDbVE~
u
r
=- " I f--
.J .l~=T~
I-- f-- f:lJ
f~
I----
~ ~
h
t=r lIL-,
ILL ~ .
u u
Hf-
B
-v:.a:
.>I
t
-.L
I
In
t ~ f-
~ f-Ir-/",
I-
I--'-,,>~
II-
.;;t
1/
\H
F< 7'
f-
I
,'r
-/'
~
l
,"'""
11-
~
......
Ern
rr-n
f---
'I =
f-lltf --If--T"
>- I b~
I-- II1II1
~III.
.,.;/
r-
I;tti -
'-'I -
-
""
l+
"
-
I
I
- )
'r2?
Jk
n=1
~
1 ~
==
-'--
!t
)JJ
-
--H
II =r
I
:J
-
T .,
~~
~
h /
\
'\
~a,
I I I
II
I
/I\....
"l""fl I T'1 Ir
~ ~ L- L
It:
Location Map
r/~~~ ~ i<- -~U
(~ "JF -"I ~ "'
L.t, "\<:;:]1:1-- ,t
~J' '~.~,.
~ ~ ~ Ilb~
f.4 ~ ' [j;:\JJ
~ ~ASli i
~~T
LEGEND
..'
s
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels
~ Water
ell Park
o City Limits
Q Project Location
4,400
2,200 0
4,400
Feet
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET CRACK SEAL PROJECT
2008 STREET CRACK SEAL, ZONE 7
l ) I c-- 'fF-
~
I I- ~ ]~
-I
1- // \ . lZ::::::!
~\ :::::: /"
=- ~~ fj! '=
!l,. if !I-- =J 'l.:'>y =
--il \'" I--": If: ~
::::j
~'./ -'
rB\ ~~ ^- - =zlt
I-
>'" I- iii: :J!l:
-\=... I
-1 1 ~ Il k ~
I
. . IUW "I~D ~____
~ '< ~ Jii' -
I . g~dl...{::j ~ / Jj/71 Y..'/ y ~e- ~
,
~II III
"'- .....cg....L.j1
- I f::J "
I ,~ I I //
l--
J- I rrtn11/
./ "- r
.:::r. .J?' 1
rT -;..
,!I-- .L\. [\ 7(: ~
I-'-
f-v' II.\.
I/J"l "\ it' .\' n
. ~ I"" ,
I
LEG E N D N Location Map
..'
Right of Way -/ ~:~Jf.m f;t: ~ : 1(, ~
Q t~ " v~ ;-,-::l ~ _
Lots/Parcels s '" vf= ~~ . ,';:
., Water ~ .).. T"- ~
I"r.~:r
1,750 875 0 1,750 ~~
iii Park Feet
0 City Limits ~~
~ Project Location ^\
. ~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2009 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 7
l ) I ~. iL
I.-
~
~ -
I-
r-' ~
c-I: I // :::i:::::::
\
. ::::::1--, V
,\ /~
::::;~. . 14~
b' !!I--- r-..... ~
. -11 \'" ,J0S
r'\ 1;
"fti"/" \..--'I",
~ : ~~~ m - ~
-
. -' l ~ ~X ~ I
- ...-. '~ \\>;: ~ ~-
I ""r fDu- K'/ ~
o l:::::J,' -
IT ~ ~=t
-0-11 II =::FJI
~" III~I:
- '''''-
N -./
I I
-
~-ff TITT -
::::J
~
It u.
\:
~
~
~
I
\
!- \.cL
/-1 \.\ 1\\
-m
'4
r I~
N
..'
S
~ I
~~~0'
~L ~ ,
1\1l!.< 'x ". .
~
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels
~ Water
III Park
o City Limits
Q Project Location
1,750
875 0
1,750
Location Map
-/f"\. ~t.:l, ~ii1 :((~
d~ ". VF ~ ~
lj" L s; [Jlil;- "
'11 * '.-;:>- :;=.'
')I!il l~:f;> Lr-
~~~~J ~ ~~
~I~
LEGEND
Feet
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2010 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 8
II
/
'"
,~
~.
~I-
:1
!@:jl-=! +
\\/
1111\:
IIIIIT
IIIII
'" II
),
f-
II.
r
u
I--
1'-
i\
:
IF
.u.ur
A'" "e. I
"' G<b
I,
111111
I I
,.,. '-Ii
~ - I ~'\
~~
I~
^I
l-
I-
-I-
-
eaQ.N.~ SK
':.r
.
~~
f
I
1\
v. ~
.y;'
,("
I--~
r 7 II "-
~11r
-
~
I I llr
~
"""'m.~,,,,,,,,,,~.
LEGEND N Location Map
Right of Way ..' ~" ~ lie."'" " -~
Q t~' v E:;:f ~ _
Lots/Parcels s In "R~ ,F
.. Water ~* ::'
"'- !lttli'l: '.J'
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 G~:1
III Park Feet
0 ? L C1 \-11.
City Limits ;,'!. ~..l!
GJ Project Location .Jr.-\
'~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2011 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 9
.
~ I
1 1
--
ri 1\
LLLJ
I f-
\' 11
-s=
\ 'r
: ~/
//
'\
~
~
;::
=-
I
f"~
UJ
;Y II----
--'-1111 1\'" I
-
; ~~--"-
- -, I T W:;lJpl ~::::>
.'fW 0 =riE
. ~L ~ ~E
II I . III! ~
I I ::::l
I I ::::;::
L
r1
I I r
~L_ ~ I
~X- ~= 0
hLK~ p
~ I- / I
I~ l.- r-.
/
'-
I
I
I
IIlf',
I
oR\.r:u=
j:J
I
-~
r.{l~
L- L I
H1--I11111"-Il-'
.\~
rt~
.IJJ..ll~
v \\IT1~
~
=
L..
R
f3
i~'9~
; I~
Rml!JN
L.~
r
I
1 I
tiJ
-
\ ""'~ 1
i \?'\4~\ T
II~\
'"
LEGEND
..'
s
Location Map
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels
. ~ Water
III Park
o City Limits
(iJ. Project Location
2,200
1,100 0
Feet
2,200
r-/~ ~I-,,~ ~ -{v
~ "Vf ,.....,.. ~ f..
l~" "\'Ei' ;,L:U-- ,t
;1 !ffi ' C ~ it J.'
"it!i I J.! -L
r., 2t ;: I '"~
"ll g .. :tJJ
.Ii
~'II'f
hI
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 20 Years
Category StreetslHighways
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streels 1 Highways
o
Project # 07-43100-03
Project Name Annual Street Mill and Overlay
Description
The Street Mill and Overlay projects will consist of milling the existing street surface and constructing a new asphalt surface. Minor shouldering
and restoration work will be included with the project. In developments that have existing bituminous curb or no curb or ditch, concrete curb and
gutter will be constructed. 25% of the total project costs are assessed to the benefiting properties in each development This program helps to
maintain the integrity and value of the communities street infrastructure.
Areas to be reconstructed are shown on the attached maps and are listed below. The timing of reconstruction of developments more than two years
out may be revised as street conditions and ratings are reviewed on an annual basis. Additional developments may be added to the schedule or
projects moved up if it is advantageous to reconstruct them in conjunction with other nearby projects.
2007 - Indian Meadows 3rd Addition, Kelsey Estates, Woodland Ridge
2008 - Northglen, Grow Oakview Estates
2009 - Stenquist Addition, Johnson's Oakmount Terrace, Ivywood Estates
2010 - Prairie Meadows, Enchanted Drive Area, Alladin Acres
2011 - Lan seth-Thrane 1st and 2nd Additions, Xenia Street 1 Yin e Street 1161st Avenue
Justification
The streets in these neighborhoods are in excess of20 years old and are in need of rehabilitation. The intent of this Street Mill and Overlay is to
provide the community with a high quality transportation system and maintain a constant upkeep of the City's street infrastructure.
Expenditures
Construction
2007
957,970
957,970
2008
813,986
813,986
2009
915,060
915,060
2010
965,670
965,670
2011
925,069
Total
925,069
Total
4,fiT7,755
4,sT7,755
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Assessments 239,492 203,496 228,765 241,417 231,267 1,144,437
R & B - Overlays 718,478 610,490 686,295 724,253 693,802 3,433,318
Total 957,970 813,986 915,060 965,670 925,069 4,sT7,755
Operational Impact/Other
The rehabilitation of the streets will reduce the routine maintenance (Crack sealing, pot hole patching, etc..) in the area. Long term, this
reconditioning will prolong the structural stability of the roadway making for a longer serviceable life.
82
Friday. October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILL AND OVERLAY (2007)
INDIAN MEADOWS 3RD ADD. & KELSEY ESTATES
LEGEND
N
w.'
s
Location Map
Right of Way
Q LotslParcels
Water
o
,
320
640
1,280
.
~
~
G
Park
City Limits
Feet
83
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILL AND OVERLAY (2007)
WOODLAND RIDGE
o
VERDIN
LEGEND
N
..'
s
Right of Way
Q LotslParcels
Water
iii Park
o City Limits
o
.
360
720
Feel
84
"0
Location Map
1,440
.
., Capital Improvement Plan
~JJDbVE~
Project Name: ANNUAL MILL AND OVERLAY (2008)
NORTHGLEN 3RD ADD. & DOWNTOWN CENTER
I
'i/fi ;~' 2ND ADD.
~00<J' lh,<J-
QUIGKSTROM '''----~~~
\vO~D r 4DT'1 -
f-- -
fZbN.1 I -
-
-
" -
1\:(7)
k.~~ EJ I
T-~ . 0<$ I:li .
h.' ~ ,
~~-2 :::1-:\r~<J/ I J1;;t,>:+~~:<~}0i~I';;;/t?n'r'0}- ,;j ,
j ;... irooQ1-~ ,wNI"~~0Dr;.A1' 1"'.
o~ -.~?>~/ f--
ORTHGL;EJ ~~ !11! ~ If'Fx'
'. .". I d 7!lBblii~ ;:!~. Iii :,\"r~ 2NP
4rt?D1 I 11_ I &;ADDii 1"Ii
, ",-...."."",,".-<,'
I
. !, iNORTHGLEN .
. . I -1 1 T
~ ~ -11 :., ,
~. - I I JI""
:::;
- ,,' I - T U
".. .j
"., \....;
- ~ TT J I
/ j hI
N 'O~D~ANDIC?EK
- I I T
- o~~ ~o~
-GOCA!:; ~4'~<$ \)0 ~-&~- "'~~~~ mcroWNH
0<$ ,,,...."",,p.....d',. . )I
qIL C It! ~~~s ""t-;"'''!'.'''OF''WOO
ADD (S; IT] tOfrRE
,'>
Ilffi
In B 1
I~I~
Location Map !
".
w~ ~E ~~ ~ t)J
~,~
~ " "Vra'j ~ ii ,
L E G E N D s
..f,~ ,>
Right of Way \ I -11~ " '::- ~
';ii, l.I" 1J.Vr>
Q LotslParcels "1 j
0 385 no 1,540 ci ~~ 1
Water . . ,/ ~
iii Feet
Park 85 '/ &>; .Ii
,
I Q City Limits ),-..\
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILL AND OVERLAY(2DD8)
GROW OAK VIEW ESTATES
o
LEGEND
N
w.'
s
Location Map
Right of Way
Q LotslParcels
Water
II Park
o City Limits
405
810
1,620
.
o
.
Feet
86
Q
,.
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILLAND OVERLAY (2009)
IVYWOOD ESTATES
ANDO
WES
LEGEND
N
W<~,
S
Location Map
Right of Way
Q LotslParcels
Water
d Park
o City Limits
o
.
280
560
1,120
.
Feet
87
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILL AND OVERLAY (2009)
STENQUIST ADDITION
LEGEND
N
w.'
s
Location Map
Right of Way
Q LotslParcels
Water
365
730
1,460
.
o
,
~
~
o
Feel
Park
City Limits
88
o
REG
LAND
SURVEY
NO. 072
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILL AND OVERLAY (2009)
JOHNSON'S OAKMOUNT TERRACE
LEGEND
N
w.'
s
Location Map
Water
o
,
280
560
1,120
,
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels
dB Park
o City Limits
Feel
89
.
~ J4DbVE~ Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILL AND OVERLAY (2010) 0
ALLADIN ACRES /!t N. ENCHANTED DR AREA
,\01\ I I 11 J
f!$W
I---- 1-
"-
SILVER /
MEADOWS
~"11 \ I
... If
..",,\ ~
~aJs I -\
AND L
Y ~
126
-
\ - I
REG.LAND ,
SURVEY
NO 081 ix .
"\
/' 1t
.,
MEADOWS ~~,.
'\ ~
=
( r ~I
r ~
N Location Map
w.'
LEGEND ,.r'N1-~ ~~ K~
Right of Way s ~t"'~~ 3!ii 1 ,'j
Q LotslParcels , I :j; -....1 :: p: J. -
..,;;; Y Ill! . ~-:r' ...
Water 0 500 1,000 2,000 ~~\:.~L ~
dB Park , , ~ L [~
Feel
0 City Limits 90 'r ;_.~
(iI Project Location ),...\
I ' . Capital Improvement Plan
rwnbVE~
Project Name: ANNUAL MILLAND OVERLAY (2010)
PRAIRIE MEADOWS
~sg ~
S
j
-
~
E~ \i'lEw !iJ
S 2ND ADD ~
I I ~ DEE~, 4:Hlm
,,,.,~~,.~, . . .,. r OAKS.
<SYLC:1R
.,
rf5>S~ I \ V I
'\ o:;;~%';4ii+8ti0Y4::_~PRAIRIE~'1;~\" 0 . t ~
MEADOWS
,';j;
tr1 TIK1BER MEADOWS
~ . .,; li!!>
.
~ '~ ~I
I ' '"
I I
N Location Map
w.'
L E G E N D ~N ~"JrJ~;r; K ~
Right of Way ,,' "- ~ i tL
s ldn I 1----. 1
Q LotslParcels . ~I *Jh'~I~~~"T H
Water 0 435 870 1,740 ~"'" ~
dB Park , , , [~
Feel
0 City Limits 91 'f ;~~
(iI Project Location ),...\
~~NDbVE~ Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILL AND OVERLAY (2011) 0
LANGSETH THRANE 1 ST & 2ND ADD.
I I I I I ---
L- I_I
I I I
./ !?' J. (J~<? ~
~ /;ff;) _"y~~\'>C;
($9-
OlfAif'2ND o '"
LANGSETH
PINE<ACRES .
/~!fl;'~ ,'-
ADDITI0\ I ktmD -
I I I I I
II 'h
WWti'lilUi:NGSE1H TIJRANE',;,;' ~~ ' ,~
1 I I I I ..
Q
:ll;
-
IEW ~T
) ADD
\/\ I I . _I
DEER
N Location Map
w.'
LEG END ~~~ : ''))
Right of Way
s L,/n - R~
Q LotslParcels ~I * L; >" ~ 0. -, r'l ...
I'IJS i ~dh .~ !III
. =
Water 0 387.5 ns 1,550 << ,;~J ~ L' 1b .{-.
dB Park , , ,~ q:~
0 Feel
City Limits 92 !~
(iI Project Location
NDbVE~ Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL MILLAND OVERLAY (2011)
XENIA - VINTAGE STREET AREA
I
"-
. /\
~ / \
/ .
L~~IN. ---
-
\ -
lcRks 0'-"
T
~.if.
~F
\ r:ill
I Me"" I
ix ,PINE-
IID..LS
IADD.
rj
, \
., ~
MEADOWS
!
"
,
.
( r I
I
M ~
I
N Location Map
w.'
LEGEND &f~ J;m-r~ K~
,." tl
Right of Way ~ .t,L
s '" I-LI -J,1
DQ LotslParcels ~I *
, f'- ~
Water 0 455 910 1,820 ~ . '-< 1L J~
dB Park I , , C, '=l , cr0J
c .,
Feel
10 City Limits 93 "
~
0 Project Location lro-'\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-43100-04
Project Name Annual Pavement Markings
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 1.2 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets / Highways
Q
Description
The pavement striping for City streets is conducted one time per year, This includes centerline striping and shoulder striping, Striping enhances
the safety of the roadway by directing traffic to the correct lane movement
Justification
I
Striping is required through the local and state agencies. A reflective standard is required. Restripingannually maintains the pavement markings
to the required standards. .
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Improvement 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 85,000
Total 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 85,000 0
Funding Sources
R & B - Reserve
2007
15,000
15,000
2008
16,000
16,000
2009
17,000
17,000
2010
18,000
.18,000
2011
19,000
19,000
Total
85,000
85,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The pavement markings are contracted out each year adding virtually no operational impact.
o
94
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-43100-05
Project Name Annual Curb Replacement
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Years
Category Streets/Highways
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets / Highways
Description
Damaged and failing concrete curb and gutter throughout the City needs to be repaired or replaced to help maintain the integrity of the roadway
system. Replacing damaged or failing sections of curb and gutter helps with drainage of the roadway and prolongs the life of the street system.
Justification
The majority of the concrete curb and gutter throughout the City is in relatively good condition. However, there are isolated areas that need
rehabilititation every year. Failing or damaged sections of concrete curb and gutter are removed and replaced. Replacing damaged sections of
concrete curb and gutter maintains the integrity of and prolongs the life of the City's street infrastructure.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Construction 40,000 41,000 42,000 43,000 44,000 210,000
0 Total 40,000 41,000 42,000 43,000 44,000 21 0,000
Funding Sources
R & B - Reserve
2007
40,000
40,000
2008
41,000
41,000
2009
42,000
42,000
2010
43,000
Total
43,000
2011
44,000
44,000
Total
210,000
210,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Repairing failing or damaged sections of curb and gutter reduces the routine maintenance required by the public works department
o
95
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets / Highwlo/S
o
Project # 07-43100-08
Project Name Rail Road Quiet Zones
Description
Construction of quiet zones in the four southern rail road crossings in the City require improvements to comply with rail road requirements.
Construction of these improvements would result in crossings where trains would not need to blow their horns. Necessary improvements at
Bunker Lake Boulevard and 161 st Avenue include construction of divided roadway sections with concrete medians and sign installation. The
Andover Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevar crossings will have Automated Horn Systems. These systems will not require improvements to the
roadway or existing crossing gates.
Justification
I
Improvements are planned at the following crossings:
2007 - Andover Blvd ($90,000) & Crosstown Blvd ($90,000)
2008 - Bunker Lake Blvd ($130,000)
2009 - 161st Avenue ($95,000)
Expenditures
Conslruction
2007
180,000
180,000
2008
130,000
130,000
2009
95,000
2010
2011
Total
405,000
405,000
o
Total
95,000
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Municipal Stale Aid Funds 95,000 95,000
R & B - Reserve 180,000 130,000 310,000
Total 180,000 130,000 95,000 405,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Improvements will enhance the quality of life for residents living adjacent to the crossings, resulting in less disruptions from the trains while
providing safe crossings for vehicular and pedestrian traffic.
o
96
Friday, October 27, 2006
'I
, .
f J4DbVE~
I I
I I
11'
III -, T
~~ ~
~ I" ba:ill~ Z
~lll'T' ~
\ I
I
~"
HI
11
II I
I I
'I,
111I1:ll!lliI"
-
-
!=
~
""
l'it
IU
~
~~I
. ~1lRr\,
"
I~ I~
~ ~ 10 lEI: -
III' H r
llijL5:~ LBO JJ I
t= I{Ql:I 1I~'), ihogc (ll
I LEGEND
D~
~
~
Q
(iI
City Limits
Water
Park
Lots/Parcels
Project Location
~
~
, n
II,~ '"
fj3WI ~ ~/
o
,
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: RAILROAD QUIET ZONES
'\
~. J"f-::o- t,i[ ~
, ~ T I'l-' -0f
-ii_~ i' (#,"0{-
· ~E'~I~ I I ~ I~ 1
I:><: Y'>. IH I ~ ~ ,::' ,:r
~ I::::- ---;::::It L
,I - II, :::j~~T\l:
I J.. s...., l3IJ[;ih: r:::
,I I ~!edL
VI J ~~
~
'\
II "I I
~I;--
v t--
t--
t--
;--
r- -
-" r--
"II 1\
I I
~J... 19. V r-
-
I
ij
'-
1=
_ t:/{
~;:::::
.J
~
1200~
N
W.'
S
,
Location Map
1,500 3,000
6,000
.
r-/ q 1-MF t;I .+4""1
(~" ~4~ i[ "-r
\..,;n . ~r-, I'
SJ * tz; 1:- ft' '
~~ '~rL ~
q~f' ~
. III ~..!li
. ,
Feet
97
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Ufe 20 Years
Category Streets/Highways
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets / Highways
o
Project # 07-43100-09
Project Name Municipal State Aid Routes I New & Reconstruct
Description
The following projects are proposed to be constructed and/or rehabilitated to meet State Aid Standards. The rehabilitation projects will consist of
milling the existing street surface, constructing concrete curb and gutter where it does not exist, and improving storm drainage.
2007: HansonBlvd (133rd Avenue to 140th Lane) - $1,615,000
2008: South Coon Creek Drive (Round Lake Blvd - Crosstown) $844,200
2010: Nightingale Street (Crosstown Blvd - 161st Ave) $767,000
2011: Prairie Road (Andover Blvd - Crosstown Blvd $714,000
Justification
2007: Hanson Boulevard (133rd Avenue - 140th Lane) - Upgrade needed to maintain roadway infrastructure and accommodate traffic volumes.
Project will be let and constructed by AnoIca County, Street lighting will also be installed.
2008: South Coon Creek Drive (Round Lake Blvd - Crosstown) - Upgrade needed to maintain roadway and meet State Aid Standards.
Constructed concurrently with trunk water main extension.
201 0: Nightingale Street (Crosstown Blvd - 161 st Ave) - Upgrade needed to maintain integrity of State Aid roadway infrastructure,
2011: Prairie Road (Andover Blvd - Crosstown Blvd - U e needed to maintain inte ' of State Aid roadwa infrastructure.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Construction 1,615,000 898,800 767,000 714,000 3,994,800 0
Total 1,615,000 898,800 767,000 714,000 3,994,800
770,400
567,000
643,000
Total
1,033,000
488,000
2,197,400
146,300
6,500
123,600
Funding Sources
Assessments
Federal Funds
Municipal State Aid Funds
R & B - Reserve
Sewer Trunk Fund
Water Trunk Fund
2007
633,600
488,000
217,000
146,300
6,500
123,600
1,615,000
2008
128,400
2009
2010
200,000
2011
71,000
Total
898,800
767,000
714,000
3,994,800
Operational Impact/Other I .
Rehabilitating the roads will reduce the amount of routine maintenance along these sections of roadway and provide a safer and higher quality
transportation system,
o
98
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2007
N
Right of Way ..'
Q Lots/Parcels
s
~ Water
III Park 0 625 1,250 2,500
. ..,)i;j , ,
0 City Limits Feel
99
GJ Project Location
Location Map
~NDbVE~
t
I
/I
.-
=
~
f- =
'-.,-
/ .J- ~ []J[I]
-
I~
'"/-
-
-
=
-
-
:::
~~
~~I
11
r
5\)'
I
~ Mf
~-
LEGEND
Right of Way
Q LotslParcels
Water
II Park
o City Limits
(iI Project Location
L
,
\;,
1'%
y \11.
I
T
o
.
,
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2008
o
.
~/~
V~\\\lllrf
/
- ;COO/ie"-Cll!' /~ '"
""ql;;cl('
I)
~/
~
!' .,,,,,.,,,.,,
LJ
-
L-
-
,
1
~
-I
-
-
-
-
-,.....J
f-
I I ,..-
~ I/I-:~
"~~~/ ===lill
~~ ART L.-
~
<'f€
9f!
~
'-
-
-\-
.~
j-
Ii....
"'--
~;Sl "
-
-
^ -
-= ~ ~~~+l
I rror~' ~
~ ILoc~tion M~~
~~'f~.~~ :K~
I -I.,~ v~ ,:::::;:;l ~ _ /
-~ Y " r
~I* '~ ,.I~ ~~II
3,400 "1 c"j- :!~, r -. '" ~
, CikJ( ~
-, ~.ll:
lr--.\
II
l
.
~v
N
..'
s
850
1,7QO
Feel
100
---- :;-
r} V,tI
- - ~ "-..
---Ci \ '"
- ~~flll id /
"" /\'118'11 .__~- == I "".-
( ~ ~ --~
~ ~ 11 -- --~jLQ\)
/ ~ ~ ::: - 1== ,,,,,"
T I II ~
111111111
~) ~lf ::::::J
o 0 ",-f:::J I
o 111111 ;fl!!;/
I II II III I I
I I I I I l,,~
- -
I
I .,
~\NDbVE~
I 1
. . . :'."'.
II
I I I
'<16~ST'iAVELJ
H
v~
LL::~
=
I!
~
I
'\,
1/
.--~
r- ~,
I
~- -
,- -
~f~~
~~~
,.- I
I-
I I
,,/
--Jd 1 \
-
.
LEG E f4,lEU"J'
Right of Way
Q Lots/Parcels
~ Water
d Park
o City Limits
GJ Project Location
o
,
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2010
--,
I
I
B//
I
\:Ii
&--
I",
I
gl
I
<'
~
II
\(
::/> I'l
I. ,/ ~
fL ..
'-...r-
-
.
I
I
lill.-
I
f-_
-<,-
I
~
-
-f-
\~
I-
I
- ,...
I
"
~~~ I
III I I I I I I I I A ,wllillll!li
~~
s
~~
(~II
Lo iO,n Map R
,.r'~ ~.kn~ ~ -~~
(i~' '1' t-:':::! ~ ~
Lsn -, RfTl1.:- ,1'
'"~ ~~.~ r-
III ~ l~
~fL r_.rc~
C; ,il L ti,JJ
~ ~
(,
"'\
750 1,500
3,000
,
I
Feel
101
Capital Improvement Plan ,
~NDbVE~
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES 0
RECONSTRUCT 2011
.
::E 'IWF ~ ~~
~ ~ V V /"X"l\,/ /"
~
" -
\~ / Imr
1= Jr
::J: .r- ~
'\~ I
:---.1::: J
4 VI I ~
nrTT ~
I!"CSU I liII II "\
I
"
, S> .
v
,
- ."- ~
.-
- ~
-
,. f en
~-
I~
,
-
,
,g 1....----
~ l- .J I
,.
-/ I - .....",
I----
~ ~ ~ '-
j
Ii ~ !P"~"\*,"Ili~;';._ N " Location Map
F .
LEG E NfO I w.'
Right of Way ,.r' ~ ~l4n ~ tJ : ~LG
Q Lots/Parcels (~" v ~~ tL
S L-ln . ~ !-- I
~ ~ . ,V. l'. .
Water Y'liS A",,,,' ....
d Park 0 850 1,700 3,400 ~ ,~~~ ~ \~~
, .
0 City Limits Feet 'I ~ Ji
102
GJ Project Location , ),...\
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-43100-10
ProjeetName Intersection Upgrades
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Yean;
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets / Highways
Description
2007 - Construction of turn lanes at the intersection of Crosstown Blvd and Nightingale Street ($175,000)
2008 - intersection upgrades, including construction ofa traffic signal, at Hanson Blvd and 133rd Ave. This signal will include a cost share with
the City of Coon Rapids, ($175,000)
2009 - Construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of South Coon Creek Dr and Round Lake Blvd, Minor lane widening may be needed but
turn lane construction would not be included in this project ($275,000)
Justification
intersection upgrades are necessary due to the increased development and demands on the transportation system, the need for safety improvements,
and to comply with Anoka County Highway Department requirements.
Expenditures
Construction
2007
175,000
Total 175,000
2008
175,000
175,000
2009
275,000
275,000
2010
2011
Total
625,000
e
625,000
Funding Sources
Municipal Slale Aid Funds
2007
175,000
175,000
2008
175,000
175,000
2009
275,000
275,000
2010
2011
Total
625,000
625,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
Improvements will improve the flow of traffic and will improve the safety of vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists.
o
103
Friday, October 27, 2006
c-2\CITY OF ~
r ,NDOVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: COUNTY INTERSECTION UPGRADES
o
.
~
l'
/ I
"
/
'),l;lrl
nni'
,
I
I h =lr""":....J .......... \~..~
I Crosstown Blvd & Nightingale St (200!) <
I I I I / I/~\\J/r[~,r;
I
iF.
~ll
/"'4"4'r~ot~EJk/ l'I,.....~-mrr
_~ ""f(~ITITr ~
"It, South 1~~nXek Dr ~ Round Lake BI~d (~009)
~. ~\ ~
': ~., ~--: .
F0 ). "-0
.W II, >~::E'::
~t;:Il
~
""
-
.r
l=
01-
F:::h- /
HJ 11
'H*
\
'i': ~
:s .
~
m
I
.
.
IIITT
~'CoO~.cflJEEK
'"
.
~
-\D.
n 1Tlftr!r
"
h
-
~
,_L-
-
tmJ!
~2[
I
~,
'., ~
,'/
=t
-.=
~J
IIII h- ~
"l'I>~~
-'-'"
-/
I
'FfEii .
~
1 IlII
'-- SO TTT
fl8a50 ~
~ =.
rm) .. i ~
Hanson Blvd & 133rd Ave (2008) =I '}
'- 7'
-
a
.--
~
:j
TI 1\\
iH
&;'
N Location Map
w.'
, r-/K\~"'m # j K~
LEG E N D [p.;'~ = ~ 1 rJ
s ~n "~~~t;-}, 'f
Right of Way /"11 ifi""" '0 If: ..
"). III 1 ~!(<]'[SL-"
Q LotslParcels 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 ~:$; ;it; ., ,t: ibt
Water , . ISL. lL IiJI
"iJ~~,t "-
Feel lor v~ .li
dB Park 104
...
0 City Limits lr-..\
.
---- - --- - - - -.
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-TRAIL-Ol
Project Name Construct Bikeway! Walkway Corridors
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Trail Construction
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets / Highways
Description
2007 - North side of Crosstown Blvd from Nightingale St to Hanson Blvd ($210,000),
With this project the Trail Funds will be fully expended. Additional trail projects will be identified in the future once funds become available in
the Trail Fund.
Justification
Improve pedestrian and multi-modal access to various destinations within and externally to the city,
Expenditures
Construction
2007
210,000
Total 210,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
210,000
210,000
o
Funding Sources
Trail Funds
2007
210,000
Total 210,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
210,000
210,000
Operational ImpactlOther I
Additionallong-tcnn maintenance and snowplowing will be necessary.
,
o
105
Friday, October 27, 2006
9\NDbVE~
NIGHTINGALE
ESTATES
~-1
p;S
~
\
I I I
\\
-
c--
L....,.-
\,
~J.
STt-r:t- \
<\
f--
f--
f--
f--
T\\\\ 1
LEGEND
o City Limits
~ Water
III Park
Q Lots/Parcels
Right of Way
(iI Project Location
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: 2007 CROSSTOWN BLVD 0
CONTRUCT BIKEWAY I WALKWAY CORRIDORS '
I Hijl
'\ Iii' arLo,
}..-
\
o
.
-
- '--
k
-
-
--
N
w.'
s
350 700
Feel
106
I
~~~I
w
\
\
I:QU<1J
,/""
........-
V
V
I
?
uif
\
I
II
I--
"o-q<-
'--..;~$?~~-
\I?~
~INr'~D c-
"" {""{ESTATES
-
-- ~I'i)--
Location Map
=i
-ld
1,400
,
r/~ ';;an ~ ~ : J.: L
~~ ,- v= ~ I ~ ~
\1; "\$;Tl1.J;- /}
IUcI:E ':;~ 'It lr __
'L i IllS u:1' .....
~ if,Ll,.J 1)-;: ,.lb.{..
r:;~\- ~L, \ {-,
"ll [~
;~
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-48100-01
Project Name Rehabilitation of Wells
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 7 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Water
Description
The motor, pump and column pipe are taken out for inspection and worn parts are replaced. The well is televised to determine the depth and
condition. If the well is at or close to the original drill depth evetything is put back in place. The well may need to be cleaned out to the original
depth if there is a substantial decrease in the depth.
Justification
To make sure the well is operational to what it is designed for and to correct any problems that may affect our ability to produce the amount of
water needed to meet the demand. A complete inspection and maintenance overhall is performed on each well a minimum of once every seven (7)
years.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Improvemenl 45,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 245,000
0 Total ,45,000 45,000 SO,OOO SO,OOO 55,000 245,000
Funding Sources
Water Fund
2007
45,000
Total 45,000
2008
45,000
45,000
2009
so,ooo
so,ooo
2010
50,000
50,000
2011
55,000
55,000
Total
245,000
245,000
Operational Impact/Other I
This would be done at such a time that it would not affect the demand needs of the system. Typically done late fall.
o
107
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-48100-02
ProjeetName Sealing orWell #1
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Improvements
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Water
c
Description
Well #1 would be sealed offfrom use by a licensed well contractor,
Justification
This well has not been used for sometime now, This particular well is 600 feet deep and is pumping a high volumne of sand when it was in
operation. The well was designated as an emergency well about four years ago and was not used in this time frame. The formation of this well is
very soft and would take a considerable amount of money to try and make it produce the water needed There is no other aquifer in this area above
the existing aquifer. It is also a well that is high in radium which is another reason not to use it. It would be in the best interest of the city to seal it
and use the water from the treatment facility to feed this area. Money would be best spent on making the water system one system rather than the
two we are currentl usin .
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
10,000
10,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
10,000
10,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Water Fund
2007
10,000
10,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
10,000
10;000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I '
Money usually used to treat the water at the well head is no longer needed There would be a power savings also as the well would be pulled and
all the controlls would be eliminated from the well house,
o
108
Friday, October 27, 2006
,
< , Capital Improvement Plan
f J4DbVE~
Project Name: SEALING OF WELL #1
l I ) ,-~-=- / I
, !NORTHGL~N
/~
139TH AVE f- ,
... () u
Cl ,
r" 0 r
,... n::
w
~ ;J~~V "- ?=
!-' cY 1". "H .~
~ H
f Ie
'""
~ 1 ~t$ I H LN
~ 0 woc
f- ~ , IrL
... 1 ' ~R "H A\
co et-.. '~
i' 138TH CT
W I , 11.' ~
::::c o~ '.1 ~,\q~
<{ ~~~'\.~ '\.~~ ~~\)
-LOCAL- ....J \)0 c~~:=tt
OIL 0 ~s'\.
Z
iD :) ~~
0
a:::
o B
136 H _N ~ -~
I 1 I I I
N Location Map
w.'
LEGEND rr~~Jfmft j K~
0 City Limits ~ " vF. F--f ~ 1 ~
s , :Et' ~~ ,} /:!
~~ Water ~I *1:, IW u;:r I
. i ,h -<
dB Park .~~ .t
''''C'''~ 0 195 390 780
Q LotslParcels , , ~ ctWI"
(iI Feel
Project Location 109 ~.Ei
e Wells . -)r....\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-48100-01
Project Name Water Main along South Coon Creek Drive
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Water
c
Description
Install a 12" water main along South Coon Creek Drive from I45thAvenue to Crosstown Boulevard.
Justification
Construction of a water main along South Coon Creek Drive will allow the existing water distribution system between the east and west sides of
town to be looped. The only existing connection between the two parts of town is along Bunker Lake Bonlevard. Looping of the system will
allow treated water to be continuously supplied to all residents in town on the water system. It will also help alleviate the pressure variance that is
experienced between the east and west sides of town, Coon Creek Bonlevard is scheduled for reconstruction in 2008, It would be advantageous to
construct the water main concurrently with the roadway reconstruction.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
795,000
795,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
795,000
795,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Water Trunk Fund
2007
2008
795,000
795,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
795,000
795,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional maintenance and flushing requirements for the water main system will result. Construction of this system would make management of
the water distribution system for the City as a whole easier by eliminating the two pressure zones,
o
110
Fridoy, October 27, 2006
Capital Improvement Plan
, .
f~bVE~
~\,
1:.....U-J.'\1~ =
~
-=
~
t=~
)Q
dB
o
(iI
Project Name: WATER MAIN ALONG SOUTH COON CREEK BLVD
'--
-""^,;}"'" "'""
"""" ''''.....uON,...~ ,i" '~"
,,<<M0W 'l.#q'EEI(/
."".),
~/
"",,,ti
~
-
At:: '-
"
/-
\
L--
-
.A.
-~
\
~~
-
=
-
I I
I
II I
//H~
))~~U / I
~ d~~~j -L- - ,
\ ::' - ~~-;:;;:=::= ;;;
I "'-' ~_ j
\&>'1_
/ I I I j ""P'..:v './ r T \ III .i:---- ~
r
I
-
T
r
-,-
1-
.,....j'--J
/1 ,m-
11'( i =
- ~ /\J -
LEGEND
N
w.'
s
(~~trTI ~~f f(. )UJ--'~[l
Lsn "Ri>' \.L I'
!U =>= f,-I~' J.'
'-, I '* I lilt' I ~
~ ~:.>::~ i JO ~
~~ r q;DI
"I ~ ~
~\
Location Map
Right of Way
Lots/Parcels
Water
Park
City Limits
Project Location
o
,
750 1,500
3,000
,
Feet
111
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-48100-02
Project Name Water Tower Painting
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 15-20 YellIS
Category Utilities
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Water
c
Description
Painting of the water tower closest to City Hall, including the new City logo,
Justification
The tower is going to be in need of painting to maintain its appearance and to protect it from wear and tear. A new City logo should also be put on
the tower that show's what the City of Andover is about
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
500,000
500,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
500,000
500,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Capital Equipmenl Reserve
Water Trunk Fund
2007
2008
242,000
258,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
242,000
258,000
Total
500,000
500,000
Operational ImpactlOther I
This is a scheduled maintenance that should be budgeted for.
o
112
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, :MN
Project # 09-48100-01
Project Name Demolish 500,000 Gallon Water Tower
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Water
Description
Demolish the existing 500,000 gallon water tower located on the west side oftown.
Justification
The existing 500,000 gallon water tower will be demolished and replaced by a new two million gallon water tower so the City's water distribution
system can be managed under one pressure zone, providing treated water to all residents on the system.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
2009
175,000
175,000
2010
2011
Total
175,000
175,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Water Trunk Fund
2007
2008
2009
175,000
175,000
2010
2011
Total
175,000
175,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Maintenance of the existing water tower will no longer be required.
o
113
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-48100-02
Project Name Construct Water Tower
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Water
Description
Construct a 2 million gallon elevated storage tank adjacent to the water trealment plant
,
o
Justification
I
In order to adequately supply treated water at an acceptable pressure to the entire distribution system in Andover, a two million gallon water tower
must be constructed near the water trealment plant The existing 500,000 water tower in the southwest part of town would be demolished as part of
this process. Construction of this tower and demolition of the existing 500,000 gallon tower would eliminate the low pressure zone currently in the
southwest part of town.
Expenditures
Construction
2008
2011
Total
2,950,000
2,950,000
o
2007
Total
2009
2,950,000
2,950,000
2010
Funding Sources 2007
Water Revenue Bonds
2008
Total
2009
2,950,000
2,950,000
2010
2011
Total
2,950,000
2,950,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional maintenance and monitoring would be required of the Sewer and Water department
o
114
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 10-48100-01
Project Name WTP Reclaim Tank Addition
2007 thru 2011
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Water
Description I
Add an additional 200,000 gallon reclaim tank and process piping to the water plant.
Justification I "
In order to maintain a certain level of operations and meet the demands of the water population, this tank would help in meeting this objective,
Staff has noticed that during the high peaking months of May through September the water plant needs to backwash the filters on a daily basis.
With the single reclaim tank now in operation the daily operations will run into a difficulty with backwashing filters as there is not enough room to
handle the flows required to meet the needs. As the population continnes to increase more of a demand is put on the system to function at a high
rate of production, With an increase in tank size the operations can continue without much interuption when more room is required for
backwashing of the filters.
Expenditures
Improvement
2007
2008
2009
2010
500,000
500,000
2011
Total
500,000
500,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Water Trunk Fund
2007
2008
2009
2010
500,000
500,000
2011
Total
500,000
500,000
Total
OperationallmpactJOther
With additional storage for backwashing the filtering process would not need to be interupted by shutting down certain wells in order to keep the
filters from over loading. With an increase in capacity the water plant filters would be able io operate fully keeping the amount of water filtered at
it's hi est ca aci .
o
115
Fridoy, October 27, 2006
o
This page left blank intentionally,
o
o
116
City of Andover, MN
0 Capital Plan
2007 thru 2011
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
Department 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Central Equipmenl 7,000 35,000 28,000 70,000
Community Center 7,500 7,000 7,000 21,500
Elections 100,000 100,000
Engineertng 51,000 51,000
FaCility Managemenl 10,000 10,000
Fire 122,000 345,000 400,000 890,000 1,757,000
Part< & Rec - Operations 59,500 65,500 135,000 74,000 334,000
Planning & Zoning 20,000 20,000
Sanilal)' Sewer 300,000 300,000
Slonn Sewer 80,000 150,000 230,000
Street Signs 83,400 83,400
Streets I Highways 350,000 395,000 190,000 935,000
GRAND TOTAL 632,400 1,312,500 790,000 1,075,000 102,000 3,911,900
0
o
117
City of Andover, MN
Capital Plan
2007 thru 2011
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Source 2007 2008 2009 2010
Capital Projecls Levy 18,400 100,000
Central Equipmenl Fund 7,000 35,000
Community Center Operations 7,500 7,000 7,000
Equipmenl Bond 606,500 825,500 776,000 890,000
Sanital)l Sewer Fund 300,000
Stoim Sewer Fund 80,000 150,000
GRAND TOTAL 632,400 1,312,500 790,000 1,075,000
o
2011 Total
118,400
28,000 70,000
21,500
74,000 3,172,000
300,000
230,000
102.000 3,911,900
o
o
118
119
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Equipment Bond 411,000 40,000
New Mobile Data Tenninals in Rre Trucks 07-42200-02 2 30,000 30,000
Equipment Bond 30,000 30,00
Thermal Imaging Camera 07-42200-03 14,000 14,000
Equipment Bond 14,000 14,000
Replacement - Hydraulic Rescue Equipmenl 07-42200-04 2 30,000 30,000
Equipment Bond 30,000 30,000
Hose WasherfTester 07-42200-05 2 8,000 8,000
Equipment Bond B,ooo B,ODD
Replacemant - Rre Marshall Vehicle 08-42200-01 2 30,000 30,000
Equipment Bond 30,000 30,000
Replacement - Fire Tanker#31 08-42200-02 295,000 295,000
Equipment Bond 295,000 295,000
Walernce rescue boat 08-42200-03 20,000 20,000
Equipment Bond 20,000 20,000
Replacement - Rre Engine #11 09-42200-01 400,000 400,000
Equipment Bond 400,000 4110,000
Replacement -Ladder Truck #11 10-42200-01 850,000 850,000
Equipment Bond BSD,DOO B50,OOO
Replacement - Rre Chiefs Vehicla 10-42200-02 2 40,000 40,000
Equipment Bond 411,000 411,000
Fire Total 122,000 345,000 400,000 890,000 1,757,000
IPark & Rec - Operations I
Replacement - Seli-Propelled 48' Sweeper 07-45000-02 2 20,000 20,000
Equipment Bond 20,000 2D,~
Zero Turn Mower 07-45000-03 7,500 7,500'
Equipment Bond 7,500 7,500
Replacement - T oro Groundsmasler 328 07-45000-04 32,000 32,000
Equipment Bond 32,000 32,000
Truck - 3/4 Ton Crew Cab 08-45000-01 35,000 35,000
Equipment Bond 35,000 35,ODD
Replacement - Mower Trailer 08-45000-02 8,500 8,500
Equipmont Bond B,SOD B,5DD
Replacement - Taro Groundmaster 08-45000-03 22,000 22,000
Equipment Bond 22,000 22,000
Replacement - Large Capacity Lawnmower 09-45000-01 112,000 112,000
Equipment Bond 112,000 112,000
Replacement - Taro Groundsmaster 09-45000-02 23,000 23,000
Equipment Bond 23,000 23,000
Replacement - Trailer 11-45000-01 2 9,000 9,000
Equipment Bond 9,000 9,ODD
Replacement - One Ton Pick Up wlPlow 11-45000-02 2 65,000 65,000
Equipment Bond 65,000 65,000
Park & Rec - Operations Total 59,500 65,500 135,000 74,000 334,000
!Planning & Zoning ~
Replacement - Ford Taurus #15 08-41500-01 2 20,000 20,000
Equipment Bond 20,000 2D,ooo
Planning & Zoning Total 20,000 20,0;0
120
Department Project# Priority 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
0 ISanitary Sewer I
New JeWac Truck 08-48200-01 300,000 300,000
SanifBly Sa..... Fund 300,000 300,000
Sanitary Sewer Total 300,000 300,000
IStorm Sewer I
New Track Backhoe 08-48300-01 2 80,000 80,000
Storm So..... Fund BO,OOO 80,000
Replacement - Elgin Street Sweeper 10-43100-01 150,000 150,000
Storm Sower Fund 150,000 150,000 .
Storm Sewer Total 80,000 150,000 230,000
IStreet Si2nS I
Replacement - Sign Truck #410 07-43300-01 2 75,000 75,000
Equipment Bond 75,000 75,000
Radius Master Machine 07-43300-02 8,400 8,400
Capital """ocfs Lovy B,4DO B,4DO
Street Signs Total 83,400 83,400
IStreets / Highways I
Mounted Pothole Spray Patcher 07-43100-06 150,000 150,000
Equipment Bond 150,000 150,000
0 Replacement - Dump Truck wi Snow Removal #195 07-43100-07 200,000 200,000
Equipment Bond 200,000 200,000
Replacement - Hot Asphall Box 08-43100-02 40,000 40,000
Equipment Bond 40,000 40,000
Dump Truck w/Snow Equipment 08-43100-04 2 155,000 155,000
Equipment Bond 155,000 155,000
Replacemenl- Dump Truck wi Snow Removal #197 08-43100-05 200,000 200,000
Equipmont Bond 200,000 200,000
Replacemenl- Water Tanker 0943100-01 2 100,000 100,000
Equipment Bond 100,000 100,000
Aspha~ Paving Machine 09-43100-02 90,000 90,000
Equipmont Bond 90,000 90,000
Streets I Highways Total 350,000 395,000 190,000 935,000
GRAND TOTAL 632,400 1,312,500 790,000 1,075,000 102,000 3,911,900
o
121
Capital Plan.
City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-48800-02
Project Name Replacement - Hotsy Pressure Washer
2007 thru 2011
o
Type Equipment
Useful Life lO Years
Category Equipment
Priority 3 - Low
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Central Equipment
Description I
The existing Hotsy pressure washer is well used and becoming a high maintenance item, It has been working here for almost 15 years.
Justification I
A new one would operate more efficiently, saving time and money by having less break downs. The new one should run on natural gas rather than
on kerosene, wouldn't have to run out and buy fuel for it all the time.
Expenditures
Equipment
200"Z
2008
2009
7,000
7,000
2010
2011
Total
7,000
Total
7,000
o
Funding Sources
Central Equipment Fund
2007
2008
2009
7,000
7,000
2010
2011
Total
7,000
7,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Less break downs, saving time and money, Not having to send people out to buy fuel for it would also save money, Harder to get parts for.
o
122
Friday, October 27, 2006
--1
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful life 15 YeaIS
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Coutact PW Superintendent
Department Central Equipment
Project #
10-48800-01
Project Name Replacement - Floor Sweeper
Description
Replace Unit #324, a 1991 Floor Sweeper/Scrubber, With the addition of new buildings, it will be more economical to purchase a new unit that is
faster and more efficient I don't believe that a bigger machine is what we need but one that is just more efficient
Justification
The floors are not cleaned as often as they should be because the current sweeper's washing and vacuum portion is worn out and parts are getting
harder to find The sweeper works well outside because we only use the broom portion of the machine. The present machine works well for the
area that we now have but ifwe double the area, we will need to be able to clean the area faster and do it more efficiently,
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
2010
35,000
35,000
2011
Total
35,000
35,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Central Equipment Fund
2007
2008
2009
2010
35,000
35,000
2011
Total
35,000
35,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
A new machine would have less maintenance issues even with using it more often.
o
123
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, :MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department CenlIal Equipment
o
Project #
10-48800-02
Project Name Replacement - Service Truck
Description
Replace Unit #371, a200l SlO Ext Cab 4x4 truck with 34,000 miles. This truck averages about 7,000 miles ,a year and by 2010 it will have
approximately 62,000 miles. The new truck should be able to carry 3 or 4 people and also have a tailgate lift A crew cab truck set up with some
of the same options that are on the #371 would be good.
Justification
I
To assist mechanics with jobs outside the shop such as parts runs, schooling, vehicle repair and moving equipment around. Many tinies this
vehicle is not big enough to handle the job, A newer truck would be more efficient and help us work more efficiently. The current vehicle would
make a good intern or spare vehicle or kept as a runner/drop truck.
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
28,000
Total
28,000
Total
28,000
28,000
o
J;unding Sources
Cenlral Equipment Fund
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
28,000
28,000
Total
28,000
Total
28,000
Operational Impact/Other I
A bigger vehicle would increase operating costs - fuel and maintenance.
o
124
,Friday, October 27, 2006
,
Capital Plan 2007 thru
0 City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-44000-01
Project Name Walk Behind Floor Scrubber
Type Equipment Priority 1 - High
Usefnt Life S yean; Contact Comm Ctr Manager
Category Equipment Department Community Center
Description I
A new walk behind floor scrubber for operations at the Community Center,
,
Justificl!iion , I
The floor scrubber would be used throughout the Community Center, The field house alo
square feet a new floor scrubber would help, In addition to the field house, we would use
main street, and concessions lobby area
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009
Equipment 7,500
0 Total 7,500
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009
Community Center Operations 7,500
Total 7,500
Operational Impact/Other I
The floor scrubber would allow us to continue to maintain the facility at a high level.
0
,
125
,
2011
ne needs to be scrubbed every week, and at 16,000 +
the scrubber in the ice arena locker rooms and hallway,
2010
2011
Total
7,500
7,500
2010
2011
Total
7,500
7,500
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Project # 08-44000-01
Project Name Kitchen Equipment - Fryer/Grill
o
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15-20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Comm Ctr Manager
Department Community Center
Description I
A grill and fryer for expanding the menu a! the Community Center concessions,
Justification I
When the concessions was built, the hood and steel waIl guards were installed. This would be the next step in finishing off tha! area. The YMCA
would in the end share in the cost to purchase.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
7,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
7,000
7,000
o
Total
7,000
Funding Sources
Community Cenler Operations
Total
2007
2008
7,000
7,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
7,000
7,000
Operational Impact/Other I
The additional revenues from the sales of "hot" food items would help pay the equipment off over the years. There would be some additional costs
when it comes to hiring a cook to prepare the food, According to the Anoka County Health Department we are already licensed to operate a grill
and mer.
o
126
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-44000-01
Project Name Battery Pack Replacement - Zamboni
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 7 Years
Category Unassigned
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact
Department Conunonity Cen1er
Description I
Battery Pack for the Electric Zamboni,
,
Justification
I
The battery pack that drives the Zamboni has to be replaced every 5-7 years. Over time, the batteries will hold less and less of a charge and
eventually have to be replaced.
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
2008
2009
7,000
7,000
2010
2011
Total
7,000
7,000
o
Total
Funding Sources 2007
. Community Center Operations
Total
2008
2009
7,000
7,000
2010
2011
Total
7,000
7,000
Operational Impact/Other I
The Zamboni is a necessary part of the operation of the ice arena, and without it we would not be able to keep the facility open. The hope is that
with the preventative maintenance program that is in place, we can achieve the maximum amount of time available on the battery pack before it has
to be replaced.
o
127
Friday, Derober 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15.Yems
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Clerk
Department Ejections
o
Project # 08-41310-01
Project Name Voting Equipment
Description I
New electronic voting equipment for 10 precincts,
Justification 1
A Federal mandate to comply with HA V A - Help America Vote Act. The current equipment is non-compliant.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
100,000
100,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
100,000
100,000
o
Total
Total
2008
100,000
100,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
100,000
100,000
Funding Sources 2007
Capital Projects Levy
Operational Impact/Other I
Continued storage and maintenance of all the equipment
o
128
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-41600-01
Project Name Replacement - Blazer #11
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 YeaIS
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact City Engineer
Department Engineering
Description
Replace Unit #11, a 1995 SID Blazer with 57,700 miles, The Engineering Department puts about 5,000 miles per year on this vehicle. After 14
years, it will have approximately 77,000 miles on it This unit could make a good intern vehicle or spare vehicle ifneeded.
Justification
This vehicle is an Engineering Tech inspection vehicle and needs to be available for inspections and surveying.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
2!)09
30,000
30,000
2010
2011
Total
30,000
30,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
2008
2009
30,000
30,000
2010
2011
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
I Op",,"oruo1 ~Olb~ I
Lower maintenance costs and dowiltime,
o
129
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact City Eogineer
Department Engineering
o
Project # 09-41600-02
Project Name Replacement - Total Station
Description
Replace the existing Total Station, which is approximately 8 years old and utilizes outdated software. The Engineering Department utilizes the
Total Station to stake construction projects (curb and gutter, sewer, water main, etc) and to complete topographic surveys for design purposes. The
Total Station is used almost on a daily basis during the construction season by the Engineering Department. Replacement of the Total Station
would be approximately every 10 years upon purchase of a new unit.
Justification
The hardware and software associated with the Total Station becomes more obsolete every year, It would be beneficial to replace this unit while it
still has some trade value towards purchase of a new unit.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
2009
21,000
21,000
2010
2011
Total
21,000
21,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
2009
21,000
21 ,000
2010
2011
Total
21,000
Total
21,000
. Operational Impact/Other I
Upgrading the unit will allow for increased efficiency by the Engineering Department as new hardware and software technologies are incorporated
into the surveying discipline,
o
130
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan 2007 thru 2011
0 City of Andover, MN
Project # ' 07-41900-03
Project Name Communication Radios
Type Equipment Priority 1 - High
Useful Life lO Years Contact PW Superintendent
Category Equipment Department Facility Management
Description I
The city has a need for three 800 mhz communication radios to be used in emergency situations between the Civil Defense person, Public Works
Superintendent, Fire Chief and the Sheriff's Department
,
Justification I
Central Communications changed to the new frequency a few years back and the old system will be discontinued.
Expenditures 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
, Equipment 10,000 10,000
0 Total 10,000 10,000
,
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Capital Projects Levy 10,000 10,000
Total 10,000 10,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Without the ability to communicate between departments, we slow down the response time that is so critical when dealing with emergencies.
C
131 Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru2011
Type Equipmenl
Useful Life 10 Y can;
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contaet Fire Chief
Department Fire
o
Project #
07-42200-01
Project Name Rescue Truck
Description
Purchase a rescue truck for responding to emergency medical calls, These would be an addition to the fleet.
Justification
Currently the grass truck at St #2 is responding to all medical calls but is not equipped to handle all emergencies. Another smaller truck
designated and equipped strictly for medical calls would be more efficient and economical, thus preserving the bigger grass rig and extending its
useful life, Of the fire department responses, approximately 60% of the calls are now medical related. With the medical gear currently stored on the
grass truck, the equipment is always getting wet or damaged by fire type responses, The goal of having one specific vehicle at each station design
for medical responses will help to keep the appropriate equipment in the right locations always available for medical calls, The proposed truck will
have a fiberglass body with plenty of storage space so that we will also be able to store and transport hydraulic rescue equipment on the vehicle as
needed. The grass trucks will last us longer as they will be used strictly for wildfires and transportation of hose and equipment from fire scenes.
The medical gear and equipment will also be less likely to become contaminated by fire and have to be thrown away or cleaned before we have a
chance to use it AIl three stations have a higher percentage of medical responses and it is important that we have the appropriate vehicles to
erform the 'ob,
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
40,000
40,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
40,000
40,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
A smaller truck would be more efficient and economical and would also extend the useful life of the grass rig. By having a designated vehicle for
medical responses, the fire department will be able to carty more of the appropriate medical equipment and not have to be concerned about
contamination from grass fires or other types of fire incidents that we may respond to. The "medical " vehicles will also be kept in town and not in
other cities as they may be now when called for mutual aid assistance for wildfires.
Po
~
132
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 5 years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Project #
07-42200-02
Project Name New Mobile Data Terminals in Fire Trucks
Description
Installation of mobile data terminals (MDT's) in fire trucks.
Justification , I
By including MDTs in fire vehicles, firefighters will be able to access important data and information from the Anoka County Communications
Center and fire stations, As an example; known hazardous conditions will be identified while responding to the incident
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
30,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
30,000
30,000
o
Total
30,000
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
30,000
30,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
30,000
Total
30,000
Operational Impact/Other I
The installation of MDTs will improve communications and data capabilities. The opportunity to view important information prior to arriving at
the scene will make the firefighters jobs much safer.
c
133
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-42200-03
Projeet Name Thermal Imaging Camera
Type Equipment
Useful Life 5 years
Category Equipment
2007 thru 2011
Priority I - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
o
Description I
The thermal imaging camera is new technology that will greatly increase firefighters ability to locate heat sources in a structure. The camera is
designed to be used to find human bodies in fire situations where it is near impossible to see because of the smoke and fire encountered during a
structure fire. The camera will also be used to find hot spots in walls and lor floors during the extinguishment process,
Justification I
Firefighters will be much more effective in performing search and rescue of victims who could not get out of the structure for some reason. The
camera will also be very helpful in identifying internal hot spots that may not be visible,
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
14,000
14,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
14,000
14,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
14,000
14,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
14,000
14,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The camera will potentially save lives of victims who may not be visible by conventional methods or means. Firefighters can scan a room from one
location looking for a victim and move to the next room much faster,
o
134
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-42200-04
Project Name Replacement - Hydraulic Rescue Equipment
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Firc Chief
Department Fire
Description
Replace one (and possibly two) hydraulic rescue tools used for extrication and heavy rescue work.
Justification
The current equipment is approximately 13 years old and is somewhat heavier than the new types of equipment The new hydraulic tools also have
more capacity for pushing, pulling, and cutting activities,
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
30,000
30,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
30,000
30,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
30,000
30,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
The hydraulic rescue equipment is necessary to provide the fastest and most efficient means to extricate trapped parties. The lighter weight and
stronger tools will make the rescue work much less stressful for the firefighters to perform,
o
135
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-42200-05
Project Name Hose Wasberrrester
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment.
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
o
Description
The hose washer /tester can be used to wash hose as necessary and also to conduct the annual required hose tests.
Justification 'I
The hose washer will save time after the incident has ended in that the firefighters will be able to wash hose much faster after each incident. The
tester will be use to conduct the annual hose testing where each section of hose is required to be tested to a certain pressure for a certain period of
time, The tester will allow the fire department to keep the pumpers in service instead of committing them for the testing process.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
8,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
8,000
Total
8,000
8,000
o
Funding "Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
8,000
8,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
8,000
8,000
Total
Operational Impac1JOther I
The new washer /tester will aid in making our jobs of getting the trucks back into service much easier after the fire events. The washer can clean
hose much faster than firefighters scrubbing hose with a brush or hroom. The hose is required to be tested annually, and with the proposed tester at
least five sections can be tested at a time instead of doing each section individually.
o
136
Friday, October 27, 2006
o
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-42200-01
Project Name Replacement - Fire Marshall Vehicle
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 YellIS
Category Equipmeut
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Description
Replace Unit # 4801 - 1997 S10 Blazer with 53,000 miles. We may wantto evaluate what type of vehicle we will need for this position at the time
of replacement
Justification
The Fire Marshal's vehicle is anticipated to have approximately 65,000 miles on it by the year 2008, and the ability to respond to an emergency
with a dependable vehicle needs to be considered. There have been more maintenance issues with this vehicle, and although most have been minor,
the occurrences are increasing and the costs will also start to increase as the vehicle gets older.
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
2008
30,000
30,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
30,000
30,000
c
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
30,000
30,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The new vehicle will be used for day to day inspections and also emergency responses when the Fire Marshal is available to assist at the incident
including medical calls. It is crucial that the Fire Marshals vehicle be in good operating order to perform all of the functions needed. This vehicle is
also used to help conduct all of the fire investigations and the appropriate equipmenl needs to be stored in the vehicle. The fire department needs
to have a very dependable vehicle to perform all of the functions listed. '
o
137
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 20 Year.;
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
o
Project #
08-42200-02
Project Name Replacement - Fire Tanker #31
Description
Replace fIre tanker #31, a 1991 International/ Alexis tanker with 7,700 miles,
Justification
I
Tbis vehicle will be seventeen years old in 2008 and will most certainly need a major refurbisbmenl or replacement It would be recommended to
replace and sell the existing vehicle as is so that our fire department will benefIt from new vehicle technology that should last us for the next twenty
years. The maintenance costs are starting to increase and the body work needed should be evaluated. The new tanker will have high technology
flow meters, automated pump controls, a more efficient engine that creates less pollution in the station and on the road.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
295,000
295,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
295,000
295,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
295,000
295,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
295,000
295,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
The new technology will allow firefighters to perform their jobs in a more efficient and safe manner. The newer teChnology will allow for just one
operator to staff the vehicle for water shuttles to and from the fire scenes. Currently, we need at least two firefighters to operate the tanker properly,
The newer controls and gauges will also help to make the vehicle much easier to pump and dump water as needed. Other items that will be
improved include; electronic dump chutes for water control, inside cab controls for operator ease, larger pump that can be I.S.O. certified, better
emergency lighting for responding to the scene, more storage room, roll up doors for safer access on the scene, pre plumbed suppressant foam
su I, electronic/h draulic dum tank 10weTin device, and the room needed for a second ortable tank.
o
138
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-42200-03
Project Name Water lIce rescue boat
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Description
A small boat designed and built to perform water and ice rescues,
Justification
Andover does not currently have a rescue boat. The boat would be used to perform ice and water rescues. The boat will make these specific types
of rescues safer for all responders, The boat will allow firefighters to perform rescue work rather than waiting for a boat to arrive and perform
recovery work.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
20,000
20,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
20,000
20,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
2008
20,000
20,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Boat will make an easier and safer res,cue for all responders and parties being rescued. The boat will save lives and make it safer for firefighters
who have to enter the water or crawl on the ice. The current method of having firefighters wear wet suits and try to swim or crawl on the ice to the
victim is not very safe or recommended if we can avoid it The boat will help get the rescuer and victim out of the situation faster and safer.
o
139
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
09-42200-01
Replacement - Fire Engine #11
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
o
Project #
Project Name
Description
Replace fIre engine #11, a 1991 Pierce Lance pumper truck with 23,100 miles.
Justification
Engine # II and three other major pieces of equipment are scheduled to be replaced in the next few years, The current engine is working fine but is
starting to have more day to day repairs. As with any vehicle that is 16 years old, some parts can be harder to find and take longer to receive for
needed repairs, The fire department can not afford to have vehicles down for extended periods of time.
Expenditures
Vehides
2007
2008
2009
400,000
2010
2011
Total
400,000
400,000
o
Total
400,000
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
2009
400,000
400,000
2010
2011
Total
400,000
400,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The new technology will allow fIrefIghters to respond and conduct fire suppression activities, rescue operations, and other required activities in a
safer and more efficient manner. The maintenance costs can be lowered as well. Some of the new technology items include increasing the
capability to transport more firefIghters to the scene, internal plumbed foam suppressant system, climate controlled cab can be used for firefIghter
rehabilitation, much Detter visibility when driving to emergencies, better maneuverability, and new designs make it much easier to enter and exit
the cab area In addition the new emergency lighting standards will make it easier to see the truck while responding and also while parked at the
scene.
o
140
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 10-42200-01
Project Name Replacement - Ladder Truck #11
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Description
Replace ladder truck #11, a 1991 Pierce 75' ladder truck with 15,800 miles. The new ladder truck would be a 100 foot aerial platform, which
includes a bucket at the end of the ladder for fIrefIghter safety, The 100 foot reach will allow for the fire dep8rtment to perform rescue and
suppression activities in buildings that we can not currently reaCh.
Justification
The city is required by the 1.S,O. to have this type of vehicle available for use because of the building heights allowed in Andover. The new
platform style truck versus the cUlTent straight ladder will be much safer for firefIghter activities and fIre suppression activities. It should be noted
that the newest aerial truck equipment and technologies are better than what we are now using. The new vehicles have safety sensors and weight
distribution gauges that will keep the operators from making mistakes while operating the truck that could be very costly or dangerous, The newer
buildings in Andover are getting taller with more green space between the building and a hard swface making it much more difficull to reach some
of them because of the height restrictions of the cUlTent ladder truck.
Expenditures 2007 2008
Equipment
2009
2010
850,000
2011
Total
850,000
o
Total
850,000
850,000
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
2009
2010
850,000
850,000
2011
Total
850,000
850,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
The use of an aerial device can be very dangerous if not performed properly. A new platform truck will allow firefIghters to perform the most
dangerous of activities as required from time to time, and know thaI they have the right piece of equipment to do the job. The larger and taller
buildings now being built in Andover will require this type of equipment The cUlTent ladder truck has been fairly dependable with not many major
repairs needed. The maintenance costs are going up for this vehicle and the trade in value may be going down as the truck gets older. The new
bucket style of truck will also much safer conditions for frrefIghters performing suppression activiti,es. The new ladder truck can be equipped to
have pre-plumbed breathing air in the bucket for extended use and also high intensity lighting mounted on the bucket will greatly increase site
visibility. FirefIghters will no longer have to carry heavy equipment up the ladder but rather can swing the bucket down to the ground to pick it up.
The larger cab design will allow for transporting more firefIghters and also can be used for rehabilitation of staff when needed, The bucket design
will also allow for two master stream devices mounted near the top of the bucket to be used for extinguishment for very large types of frres. The
o over head visibili at the scene will also hel the incident commander make vital decisions re ardin the tactics and strate ies to be used.
141
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contaet Fire Chief
Department Fire
o
Project # 10-42200-02
Project Name Replacement - Fire Chiefs Vehicle
Description
Replacement of Fire Chiefs vehicle, a 2002 Tahoe with approximately 34,000.
Justification
In order to keep the first line emergency responding vehicles in the proper operating conditions, it is important to replace equipment when needed.
The current vehicle has worked very well and should be evaluated for repair history and maintenance costs as the replacement date gets closer.
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
2008
2009
2010
40,000
40,000
2011
Total
40,000
40,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
2009
2010
40,000
40,000
2011
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The Chiefs vehicle is used by the Chief to respond to emergency incidents. The vehicle has to be in good shape and able to provide safe and
protective transportation when responding to all types of incidents. The vehicle also carries all of the Chiefs protective gear and equipment needed
to help conduct fire investigations. The Chief regularly uses the vehicle to conduct interviews while on the scene with property owners and also
uses the truck to provide a place for fire victims to sit out of the elements while they are waiting for relatives or the Red Cross to respond to the
scene,
o
142
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-45000-02
Project Name Replacement - Self-Propelled 48" Sweeper
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Opemtions
Description
Replace Unit #542, a 1988 Olathe sweeper. This machine is smaller than the pull type and can get into tighter places.
Justification
I
The current machine has a lot of hours on it and is costing us more each year to repair and maintain as a front line unit
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
20,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
20,000
20,000
o
Total
20,000
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
20,000
20,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
A more cost efficient machine with less breakdowns,
o
143
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-45000-03
Projeet Name Zero Turn Mower
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 YelllS
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contaet PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
o
Description
A zero turn mower to be used by the Parks Department for mowing operations at the Community Center, City Hall and Public Works facilities,
Justification
I
This mower is smaller than the normal six foot mowers and has a zero turn operation allowing it to trim and turn in smaller areas.
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
7,500
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
7,500
7,500
o
Total
7,500
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
7,500
7,500
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
7,500
7,500
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
This machine can be used in more isolated areas and eliminate trimming with a hand mower and less clean up. Saving time, personnel and money.
o
144
Friday, October 27, 2006
c,
o
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
Project # 07-45000-04
Project Name Replacement - Taro Groundsmaster 328
,
Description
Replace Unit #560, a 1992 Toro Groundmaster 328 with cab, a 72" discharge deck and snow blower and has approximately 1,600 hours. The
Parks Department would like to replace it with a 4-wheel drive model, which is helpful in moving snow and mowing on hilly and wet terrain. The
current machine would replace one of the older units in another department
Justification
This unit is used year round and maintenance costs are rising, The cost to operate this unit increased $,58 per hour this last year. This unit used
around the Community Center, City Hall and Public Works facilities.
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
32,000
32,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
32,000
32,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
32,000
32,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
32,000
32,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
An additional unit with a cab will help during winter operations, The 4-wheel drive unit will be more efficient with its time rather than spinning its
tires and getting stuck.
o
145
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-45000-01
Project Name Truck - 3/4 Ton Crew Cab
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Usefulllie 10 Year.;
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
o
Description
Large pick up truck to haul mowers, equipment and personnel to job sites around the city, It would be similar to Uuit 502 which has worked great
This would be an addition to the fleet
Justification
To haul more equipment and personnel to various job sites saving time,
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
2008
35,000
35,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
35,000
35,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
35,000
35,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
35,000
35,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Save time and money by hauling a number of people out to the job site in one vehicle rather than two or more. A second rig would be extremly
helpful during the spring, summer and fall months when all of the part-time help is here.
o
146
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-45000-02
Project Name Replacement - Mower Trailer
2007 thru 2011
,
Type Equipment
Useful Life I 0 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
Description
Replace Uni1# T-555, a tandem axle trailer with GVW rating of 10,000 to 12,000 lbs with a trailer similar to Unit #T-554,.
Justification
This trailer has already been sandblasted and painted once before because of rust and is now starting to show its age. In addition, this trailer has
higher siderails making it diffucult to load and unload equipment
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
8,500
8,500
2009
2010
2011
Total
8,500
8,500
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
2008
8,500
8,500
2009
2010
2011
Total
8,500
8,500
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Save time and money in hauling equipment around the city on a proven multi use trailer.
o
147
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-45000-03
Project Name Replacement - Toro Groundmaster
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
Description
Replace Unit #550, a 1998 Taro Groundmaster mower with 2,700 hollIS.
Justification '
The maintenance cost are substantially higher than any of the other mowers. This machine is spending more and more time in the shop being
repaired rather than mowing and being productive,
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
22,000
22,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
22,000
22,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
22,000
22,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
22,000
22,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
More time being productive, saving time and money.
o
148
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Projeet # 09-45000-01
Project Name Replacement - Large Capacity Lawnmower
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 YelllS
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Deparbnent Park & Rec - Operations
Description
Replace Unit #580, a 1999 Taro 580 large capacity mower with 2,000 hours. This machine is averaging 200 - 300 hours per year and by 2009 it ,
wiIJ have approximately 2,500 hours.
Justification
Maintenance costs are starting to accumulate and it should be traded in while it still has some value. Maintenance costs rose $1.37 per hour over
the previous year,
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
2008
2009
112,000
112,000
2010
2011
Total
112,000
112,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
2009
112,000
112,000
2010
2011
Total
112,000
112,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
Higher maintenance cost, possibly more break downs and lower trade-in value.
o
149
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 1 0 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
o
Project #
09-45000-02
Project Name .Replacement - Toro Groundsmaster
Description
Replace Unit #559, a 1999 Toro Groundsmaster 328 with 1,600 hours.
Justification
These units are run year round and average about 300 hours a year!! With the additional parks that are added each year, the average hour that each
machine puts on will increase,
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
2009
23,000
23,000
2010
2011
Total
23,000
23,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
2008
2009
23,000
23,000
2010
2011
Total
23,000
23,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Possibility of more costly breakdowns in the future along with higher everyday maintenance issues.
o
150
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 11-45000-01
Project Name Replacement - Trailer
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
Description
Replace Unit #T-554, a tandem axle trailer with GVW rating of 10,000 - 12,000 lbs. We just had it sand blasted and repainted top to bottom
extending it useful life a few more years,
Justification
This is the main trailer for the Parks Department It was the first and only trailer that was designed for banling mowers and it has worked out
great. We would like to purchase another one just like it
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
9,000
9,000
Total
9,000
9,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
9,000
9,000
Total
9,000
9,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
More parks can only mean moving more equipment to them.
o
151
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 11-45000-02
Project Name Replacement - One Ton Pick Up wlPlow
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Parl< & Rec - Operations
o
Description
Replace Unit # 599, a 2000 F450 I-ton with 37,000 miles. These trucks are on the move all year and average about 6,000 miles per year,
Justification
Tills truck is used everyday; hauling material, equiprrient, people and also plowing snow in the winter, The plowing of snow puts a lot of wear and
tear on the engine, transmission and other drive line components.
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
65,000
65,000
Total
65,000
65,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
65,000
65,000
Total
65,000
65,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Being that this is a front line unit, we need to know that we can count on it everyday, Cost to operate it have only gone up $.22 per mile last year
put those costs will continue to rise in the coming years. With preventative maintenance, we might be able to extend its useful life,
o
152
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-41500-01
Project Name Replacement - Ford Taurus #15
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life. 10 Years
Cat!'!:ory Equipment.---.--
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Comm, Dev. Director
Department Planning & Zoning
Description
Replace Unit #15, a 1995 Taurus with 64,000 miles. This unit averages 4,000 to 6,000 miles a year.
Jusiification
By year 2008, this vehicle will have 75,000 miles on it This vehicle could be used as an intern vehicle or for city employees attending
seminars/training.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
20,000
20,000
2009
2010
, 2011
Total
20,000
20,0110
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
2008
20,000
20,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I .
Will decrease maintenance costs and improve productivity. This car could be kept and used for interns and possibly replace an older unit.
o
153
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-48200.,0 1
Project Name New JetJVac Truck
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15-20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Sanitary Sewer
o
Description
This is a combination jetlvac unit, Model 2115 Positive Displacement Unit (pD Unit) used for cleaning sanitary and storm sewers. This unit will
cany up to 2000 gallons of water and 600 feet of jetting hose,
Justification
Approximately 13 miles or 15% of the sanitary sewer system is trunk mains with diameters of 12" - 36n, These trunk mains are flowing near
capacity in some areas at the present time, By removing the sedimentation in these pipes the flow line will drop giving more room for additional
flows. In turn this could put on hold the addition of the designated lift station to by pass certain areas for a year or more. Without the addition of
this new PD Unit, the trunk lines could still be cleaned by blocking the flow in the main which will cause a backup in the system until the pipes are
cleaned. This would be done in sections at a time to try and avoid a major backup into basements, This is not the best way to do the maintenance
but would work with some risk. This type of unit can also clean flared end sections in back yards and sedimentation ponds within a reasonable
distance, This would allow some areas to be cleaned without having to enter properties with equipment that will do some type of damage to yards
savin mone in ard restoration.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
2008
300,000
300,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
300,000
300,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Sanita!)' Sewer Fund
2007
2008
300,000
300,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
300,000
300,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
This truck will help save time with cleaning of the system, It will also allow the system to be cleaned under heavy flows which cannot be done
with the machine currently being used. This type of V AC truck will allow the operators to clean more of the system without having to stop
because the truck cannot handle the flows. It would save time by not having to plug mains and risk backups into basements because of some
unforeseen difficulty.
The older machine would be used in the storm sewer department which would enable the maintenance department to clean both sanitary and storm
sewers at the same time which will help satisfy some of the rauirements for the NPDES, '
o
154
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-48300-01
Project Name New Track Backhoe
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15-20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Stonn Sewer
Description
New larger backhoe to be used to clean out ditches and stonn ponds.
Justification
Present equipment is not large enough and cannot reach far enough for cleaning out storm water ponds and ditches.
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
2008
80,000
SO,OOO
2009
2010
2011
Total
80,000
SO,OOO
o
Total
Funding Sources
Storm Sewer Fund
2007
2008
80,000
80,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
80,000
SO,OOO
Total
Operational Impa.ctlOther
1bis new machine will allow the depar1ment to clean areas that require a larger unit. The machine presently being used is to small and cannot get
to some areas of the system. More of the system could be cleaned without hiring a contractor. 1bis could also be used in other depar1ments such
as for water main re airs, ark rojects, etc.
o
155
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, :MN
2007 thru 2011
Project #
10-43100-01
Project Name Replacement - Elgin Street Sweeper
Type Equipment .
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Storm Sewer
Description
Replace Unit # 169, a 2000 Elgin sweeper,
o
Justification
I
The maintenance cost of this machine has risen $,58 per hour in the last year alone. The Spring of2006, we have put a lot of money into it
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
2008
2009
2011
Total
150,000
150,000
o
Total
2010
150,000
150,000
Funding Sonrces
Storm Sewer Fund
2007
2008
2009
2010
150,000
150,000
Total
2011
Total
150,000
150,000
, Operational Impact/Other I
We will need to monitor the costs closely over the next few years and make a decision at that time, This machine only runs about a month and a
half a year,
o
156
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-43300-01
Project Name Replacement - Sign Truck #410
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life I 0 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Street Signs
Description
Replace Unit #410, a 1995 F350 sign truck chassis with an enclosed box and 71,000 miles. This unit spends a fair amount of time idling at the job
site while the hydraulics are being used to install or remove sign posts. This truck was set up and is not very user frieodly, We are looking to at
some new designed sign trucks that are out there.
Justification
A better designed vehicle would provide safer and improved production while transporting and installing/removing equipment (signs),
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
75,000
75,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
75,000
75,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
75,000
75,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
75,000
75,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Better use of equipment, saving time and money,
o
157
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-43300-02
Project Name Radius Master Machine
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Street Signs
o
Description I
The Roper Whitney Radius Master is a metal fabrication notcher used to cut the precise corner radius specified by MUTCD for sheet sign
fabrication. It is a hydraulically operated, self-contai.n.ed unit designed to cut corner radii on sign blanks and other sheet material without having to
make blade adjustments. It requires no set-up. The Radius Master comes with the 4 radii used by Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Justification I
When using our metal shear to cut sign blanks to size and reuse old blanks, the sharp comers must be cut to a specific radius, Currently, the
corners are marked with the proper radius, put in a vise in the maintenance shop and grind the corners down with a hand held 4-112" grinder. This
process is time consuming, extremely noisy and very hot particles are exposed to the skin. A full face shield is required, as well as ear protection.
To special order sign blanks costs the city 2-3 times as much as our annual bid order that takes 6-10 weeks to receive. The cost of aluminum sign
blanks has increased lOoolo in the last I I months, The Radius Master is safe, clean, quiet and easy to use. There is no setup and clean IIp is
minimal, The machine uses 8 sq ft of floor space & operates on standard 110 electricity, The entire process to cut a comer to the exact radius
requires just seconds from start to finish. ,
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
8,400
8,400
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
8,400
8,400
o
Total
Funding Sources
Capital Projects Levy
2007
8,400
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
8,400
8,400
Total
8,400
Operational Impact/Other 1
It is quiet, inexpensive to operate, easy to use, safe and requires very little room. Maintenance is minimal due to the simplicity and few moving
parts.
o
158
Friday, October 27, 2006
.
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
o
Project # 07-43100-06
Project Name Mounted Pothole Spray Patcher
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets / Highways
Description I
This unit is a truck mounted spay patcher, used for street repairs such as Potholes, Alligator Cracks, Utility Cuts, Shoulder Work, Depressions,
Edge Raveling, and Tire Depressions, This unit carries its own emulsion and aggregate. Spmy injector patching is easy and effective, Spmy
injection patching is most economical and longest lasting method of pothole repair. The pothole is cleaned with a high-volume blower, a tack coat
of emulsion is applied to the area, a mixture of aggregate and hot emulsion fill the pothole, and a fmish coat of dry aggregate is spmyed over the
top and again the street is ready for traffic, All of this in just a matter of minutes and the patch will usually out last the rest of the road surface.
Justification I
The current trailer has reached its life expectancy and with the increase in city streets does not have the capacity to keep up with needs of the city,
This unit also needs a three person crew with two of the three standing out in traffic. There have had some vel)' close calls with traffic that don't
follow work crew warning signs. With the new truck mounted unit, ouly one person is needed to contrul all the patching functions from the safety
and comfort ofthe cab, The driver operates a joystick from the driver's seat and performs the four-step process, typically in less than a minute and
can be used nine months of the year,
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
150,000
150,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
150,000
150,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
150,000
150,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
150,000
150,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The spray patcher once filled with product can operate two to three days without having to be refilled.. With the present machine, it becomes a daily
procedure to have to leave town to refill with emulsion. The aggregate we will keep in stock so that is not a problem. So we will be able to reduce
cost, increase production, and limit our liability!
o
159
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, :MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 1 0 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets / Highways
o
Projeet# 07-43100-07
Project Name Replacement - Dump Truck wI Snow Removal #195
Description
Replace Unit #195, a 1995 LT9000 tandem axle dump truck with snow removal equipment and approximately 60,000 miles. This truck is used for
plowing snow and for hauling materials like sand, asphalt, gravel and debris,
Justification
This vehicle has been used by the city since 1994 and has performed very well This is one of the remaining few units with a manual transmission
in it It's difficult and tiring to operate the snow removal equipment and change gears at the same time. Less operations in the cab will keep the
driver alert for longer periods of time during those long snow removal days and nights.
Expenditures
Equipment
2007
200,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
200,000
200,000
o
Total
200,000
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
200,000
200,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
Total
200,000
200,000
Total
I~-I
Decreased maintenance cost and down time.
o
160
Friday, October 27, 2006
o
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-43100-02
Project Name Replacement - Hot Asphalt Box
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Yems
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets / Highways
Description
Replace a 1998 hot asphalt box donated by the Andover Lions Club, The new unit will be mounted to a flat bed roll off attachment for the new
hook truck that arrives in the fall of 2006,
Justification
The current hot asphalt box is starting to experience maintenance issues and is wasting a lot of asphalt material by not keeping it warm,
Expenditnres
Equipment
2007
2008
40,000
40,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
40,000
40,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
40,000
40,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
By attaching it to a flat bed roll off; it can be loaded and unloaded in a matter of minutes and be used year round.
o
161
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-43100-04
Project Name Dump Truck w/Snow Equipment
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Stree1J; / Highways
o
Description
Purchase a dump truck with snow removal equipment that would remove Unit # 196 from the snow removal cycle. This would be an addition to
the fleet Unit # 196 is a 1996 with 40,000 miles; it would be kept for a hackup snow plow truck and used for moving trailers and equipment year
round.
Justification
Unit 196 has a 9 foot long box which is on the short side for carrying material. It is also very difficult to load because the loader bucket is almost 9
1/2 feet wide. Performing snow plowing and salting operation makes this truck less desirable then any others in the fleet We wouldn't have to
remove plow equipment if we had to haul out material or equipment because of an emergency,
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
2008
155,000
2009
2010
2011
.Total
155,000
155,000
o
Total
155,000
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
155,000
155,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
155,000
155,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Uuit # 196 would be used as a backup snowplow truck and for moving equipment and materials year round.
o
162
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan 2007 thru 2011
o City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-43100-05
Project Name Replacement - Dump Truck wI Snow Removal #197
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 -' High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets f Highways
Description
Unit #197, a 1996 LT9000 tandem axle dump truck and snow removal equipment with 55,000 miles on it.
Justification
Tbis is one of the remaining few units with a manual transmission in it. It's difficult and ,tiring to operate the snow removal equipment and change
gears at the same time. Less operations in the cab will keep the driver alert for longer periods of time during those long snow removal days and
nights.
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
2008
200,000
200,000
2009
2010
2011
Total
200,000
200,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
200,000
lOo,ooo
2009
2010
2011
Total
200,000
200,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Changing to an automatic transmission and newer snowplow controls will give us more attentive drivers and less fatigued driver after many hours
of service.
o
163
Friday, October 27, 2006
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-43100-01
Project Name Replacement - Water Tanker
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Mediwn
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets / Highways
o
Description
Replace Unit #163, a 1986 water tanker with 63,000 miles.
Justification
The old tanker was partially refurbi$ed a few years ago because the floor and tank had rusted oul A new water truck would handle the job tasks
better and more efficiently, The Parks Depl water tanker with its cab over design and short turning radius has been a great asset to the public
works staff.
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
2008
2009
100,000
100,000
2010
2011
Total
100,000
100,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2007
2008
2009
100,000
100,000
2010
2011
Total
100,000
100,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The design of the new water tanker make it very efficient to operate and pleasure to use. The front adjustable nozzle is particularly liked by the
public works staff.
o
164
Friday, October 27, 2006
o
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2007 thru 2011
Type Equipment
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Departmeut Streets / Highways
Project # 09-43100-02
Project Name Asphalt Paving Machine
Description
Asphalt paving machine used for overlay and trails. The City currently does not own a paver which we have an increasing need for due to the
deterioration of city streets,
Justification
Due to increasing repairs to city streets, the city has a need to own a paver. It could also be used for trails,
Expenditures
Equipmenl
2007
2008
2009
90,000
90,000
2010
2011
Total
90,000
90,000
o
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2007
2008
2009
90,000
90,000
2010
2011
Total
90,000
90,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Not having to rent one, being able to use it when it fits in to our time schedule rather than having to see when one is available to rent. Share cost
with another city is an option.
,
o
165
Friday, October 27, 2006
o
This page left blank intentionally.
o
o
166
" CITY OF ANDOVER
Road & Bridge Funds w Rollup
Projected Fund Balance
0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTALS
Projected Sources of Revenue
Est. Annual MSA Construction Allocation $ 1,540,787 $ 150,000 $ 718,152 $ 718,152 $ 718,152 $ 718,152 $ 4,563,395
2001 State Aid Road Bond Pym! . Principal (140,000) (150,000) (155,000) (160,000) (170,000) (175,000) (950,000)
Available MSA Construction
for Other Commitments 1,400,787 563,152 558,152 548,152 543,152 3,613,395
Est. Annual Maintenance Allocation 307,779 307,779 307,779 307,779 307,779 307,779 1,846,674
2001 State Aid Road Bond Pym! - Interest (96,958) (91,298) (85,120) (78,583) (71,568) (64,063) (487,590)
General Fund Commibnent (169,744) (174.836) (180,081) (185,484) (191,048) (196,780) (1,097,974)
Available MSA Maintenance
for Other Commitments 41,077 41,645 42,578 43,712 45,163 46,936 261,110
Total MSA Available for other
Commitments 1,441,864 41,645 605,730 601,864 593,315 590,088 1,483,509
Federal Funds 488,000 488,000
Assessments. 363,800 873,092 331,896 228,765 441,417 302,267 2,541,237
Tax Levy 782,036 1,101,754 1,138,700 1.186,089 1,242,659 1,300,614., 6,751,852
Total Revenues Available 2,587,700 2,504,491 2,074,326 2,018,718 2,277,391 2,192,969 11,264,598
Projected Commitments
MSA - New & Reconstruct Routes 1,622,000 1,338,600 898,800 767,000 714,000 5,340,400
MSA - County Intersection Upgrades 600,000 175,000 175,000 275,000 1,225,000
MSA - Rail Road Quiet Zones 95,000 95,000
MSA - Signal Upgrades 20,000 20,000
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance 47,000 48,000 49,000 50,000 51,000 52,000 297,000
0 R & 8 - Pavement Mar1dngs 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 99,000
R & B - Curb Replacement 40,000 41,000 42,000 43,000 44,000 210,000
R & B - Rail Road Quiet Zones 13,000 180,000 130,000 323,000
R & B - New & Reconstruct Routes 148,300 146,300
R & B - Seal Coating 255,148 245,667 240,236 304,244 594,980 501,614 2,141,889
R & B - Crack. Sealing 115,700 80,726 74,470 174,295 151,472 152,187 748,850
R & B - Overiays 957,970 813,986 91S,05O 96S,670 925,069 4,Sn,755
Total Commitments 2,686,848 3,227,263 2,438,492 1,872,599 2,591,122 2,407,870 15,224,194
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (99,148) (722,772) (364,166) 146,119 (313,731) (214,901) $ (3,959,596)
Fund Balance as of December 31,2005 2,798,112
Fund Balance Brought Forward 2,698,964 1,976,192 1,612,025 1,758,144 1,444,413
Ending Fund Balance $ 2,698,964 $ 1,976,192 $ 1,612,025 $ 1,758,144 $ 1,444,413 $ 1,229,512
... Assuming collected in same year
o
167
CITY OF ANDOVER .
Park Improvement Fund
Projected Fund Balance
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 TOTALS 0
Projected Sources of Revenue
Park. Dedication Fee $2,425 per untt
platted units 100 50 50 50 50 50
Anticipated Park Dedication Fee $ 242,500 $ 121,250 $ 121,250 $ 121,250 $ 121,250 $ 121,250 $ a48,750
Commercial I Residential- Andover Station N 176.420 80,390 78,733 78,733 100,000 514,276
ONR Gr.'"t 62,500 62,500
Capital Projects Levy - Park Improvements 52,800 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 332,800
Total Revenues Available 471,720 320,140 255,983 255,983 2n ,250 in ,250 1,758,326
Projected Commitments
Annual Miscellaneous Projects 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000
Debt Service Payment 52,aoo 56,000 232,420 136,390 134,733 134,733 747,076
Andover Community Center Contribution 50,000 50,000
Andover Station North Balffields 70,000 385,000 35,000 490,000
Country Oaks West Parl< 42,188 42,188
Prairie Knoll Park 35,000 150,000 185,000
Woodland Estates 4th 15,000 15,000
Fox Meadows Park. 10,000 10,000
Oakview Park 50,000 50,000
Streotman Park. 40,000 40,000
Terrace Park 55,000 55,000
Crooked Lake Boat Landing 125,000 125,000
Woodland Crossing Park 57,000 57,000
Sophies South Park. 75,000 75,000
Forest Meadows Park. 25,000 25,000
Andover lions Park 85,000 85,000
Hawklidge Parl< 500,000 SOO,OOOr"
Total Commitments 349,988 686,000 449,420 246,390 809,733 159,733 2,701,264 ~
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 121,732 (365,860) (193,437) 9,593 (532,483) 17,517
Fund Balance as of December 31, 2005 248,757 .
Fund Balance Brought Forward 370,489 4,629 (188,808) (179,215) (711,698)
Ending Fund Balance * $ 370,489 $ 4,629 $ (188,808) $ (179,215) $ (711,698) $ (694,181)
*Target -10% of current years commitments to create a contingency for any project overages.
o
168
CITY OF ANDOVER
Trail Fund
Projected Fund Balance
c
2006
2007
2008
Projected Sources of Revenue
Trail Fee $590 per unit
platted units
2009
2010
2011
TOTALS
50
50
50
50
50
Trail Fee
$ 153,829
$ 29,500
$ 29,500
$ 29,500
$ 29,500
$ 29,500
$ 301,329
Total Revenues Available 153,829 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 301,329
Projected Commitments
04-32 Crosstown Blvd & Xeon 51 -landscaping supplies 1,578 1,578
05-25 Sophies South Trail 3,373 3,373
06-12 East side of Crosstown Blvd -139th Ave to 141st Lane 89,n8 89,n8
06-17 The Oaks Pm Trail 238 238
North side of Crosstown Blvd - Nightingale 51 to Hanson Blvd 210,000 210,000
Total Commibnents 94,967 210,000. $ 304,967
Revenues Over {Under} Expenditures 58,862 (180,500) 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500
Fund Balance as of December 31, 2005 107,455
Fund Balance Brought FOJWard 166,317 (14,183) (14,183) 15,317 44,817
Ending Fund Batance * $ 166,317 $ (14,183) $ 15,317 $ 15,317 $ 44,817 $ 74,317
O *Target ~ 10% of CUlT8nt years commibnents to create a contingency for any project overages.
- It is anticipated that all projects will not be fully expended by the end of the year, and tubne projects will be contingent on additional revenues.
o
169
CITY OF ANDOVER
Water System Flnanc:1a1 Projections
Actual Actual Aotual Estima1e Fo.....
Vo.. 2003 20" 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Inflation Fador 3.00% 3,lJO% 3,lJO% 3,llO% 3,lJO% 3.00% 3.00% 3,llO% 3.00% 3.00%
Average Use (gaDons per user pE 39,871 39,845 37,856 37,ssa 37,ssa 37,8SS 37,858 37,858 37,ssa 37,858 F'o
Ao<es Added 65 65 50 50 35 35 35 35 35 35
New Connections 200 2DD 150 150 100 100 100 100 100 100 W
New Customers 200 2DD 150 150 100 100 100 100 100 100
Total Customers 5,190 5,410 5,657 5,807 5,907 6,007 6,107 5,207 6,307 6,407
......
.... RaJe 8,05 8.45 8.87 9.49 10.16 10.87 11.63 12.21 12.82 13.46
U.. RaJe 1.26 1.32 1.39 1.49 1.59 1,70 1,82 1.91 2.01 2.11
Connection Charge 2.146 2,318 2.503 2.7.. 2.920 3,153 3,406 3,678 3,972 4,280
Area Charge 1,967 2,124 2,294 2,477 2,675 2,890 3,121 3,370 3,640 3,931
Connection/Area 8% 8% 8% ... 8% ... ... 8% 8% 8%
.... RaJe 5% 5% 5% 7% 7% 7% 7% 5% 5% 5%
U.. RaJe 5% 5% 5% 7% 7% 7% 7% 5% 5% 5%
1000rations & r
...........
U....... 1,337,130 1,329,831 1,425,123 1,550,000 1,662,696 1,809,203 1,968,073 2,100,315 2.240,860 2,390,210
Meters 28,392 48,816 46,316 25,ODD 25,000 25,000 25,ODD 25,000 25,ODD 25,000
PennlI Fees 8,350 13,350 11,350 5,ODD 5,000 5,000 5,000 5.000 5,ODD 5,000
- 25,926 14,606 21,638 20,000 20,000 20.000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Interest (93,195) 2.786 12,466 25,000 12,466 12,466 12,466 12,466 12.... 12,466
Xferln 505,170 739,438 167,424 57,671 67,485 72,883 78,714 85,011 91,812
other 127,986 5,692 7,000 4.000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
Total 1,811,773 2,276,813 1,522,585 1,799,424 1,786,833 1,943,154 2,107,422 2,245,495 2,392,337 2,548,488
Expenses
OpetaI:ions 974,455 993,752 1,098,874 1,178,096 1,167,815 1,202,849 1.238,935 1,276,103 1,314,386 1,353,818
DebtSeI'\liCe 458,030 749,467 754,392 411,720 745,663 746,228 749,439 754,221 757,507 759,440
Capital 0111181 66,196 65,000 55,000 63,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 55,000
Replacement Reserve 350,000 434,000
TDtaI 1,782,4185 2,177,219 1,919,462 1,654,816 1,968,478 2,014,077 2,038,374 2,080,324 2,126,893 2,168,258
Balance ~ Unrestricted
AnnuaJSUrpluslDeficit 29,286 89,594 (396,877) 144,608 (181,645) (70,824) 69,048 165,171 265,444- 380,230
CUmulative balance 1,569,423 1,669,017 1,272,140 1,416,748 1.235,103 1,164,179 1,233,227 1,398,398 1,663,842 2,044,072
IInfrastructure I Trunk t'Ln "lm :'1.:~ "!'i" ~71.B<f l'ii1i ji i :7~lffi -
Rove_uee
Connection Charges 797,979 1,335,347 961,261 325,000 291,985 315,344 340,571 367,817 397,242 429,022
Area C_ 93,641 101,133 109,223 117,961 127,398 137,590
Interest 45,328 50,119 79,891 85,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 r
Special Assessment 766,758 45,656 130,910 40,000 50,000 SO,OOD 50,000 ~
Replacement Reserve 350,000 434,000
othe, 12,385 2,210
Total 1,960,065 1,877,507 1,174,272 450,000 485,... 491,476 524,795 510,778 549,640 591,612
Expenses
Debt SeNice 888,235 463,254 284,210 284,210 284,210
Cap1la1 DuIlay 56,998 399,166 976,847 170,250 299,100 1,173,500 299,000 850,000 150,000 150,000
XferOUl 505,170 739,438 167,424 57,671 67,485 72,883 78,714 85,011 91,812
Total 1,450,403 1,601,ssa 976,847 337,674 356,771 1,240,985 371,883 1,012,924 519.221 526,022
Balanl;f!
Annual SUrplus1Deficit 509,&62 275,649 197,425 112,326 128,855 (749,509) 152.912 (502,148) 30,420 65,590
Balan", 1,817,697 2,093,346 2,290,771 2,403,097 2,531,952 1,782,444 1,935,355 1,433,210 1,463,629 1,529,219
lcapltal Projects 111~ ~, 1== - l\tOOl"lW :~
We"
Rehab wells 40,000 45,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 55,000
Sealing otWell #1 10,000
TMI'
New Development Projects 170,250 175,500 120,500 124,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
MSA Routes - New I Reconstrud 123,600
12" water line daNn South Coon Creek from Crosstown to Round Lake 795,000
P1anl
Paintwalerlower 258,000
2 mllion gallon storage tank 2,950,000
Surface Seal Brick Structures 18,000
DemotOW'er 175,000
WTP reclaim tank addition 500,000
Equipment 85,000
Total 275,250 354,100 1,236,500 3,299,000 700,000 205,000 205,000
Funded by Operations 105,000 55,000 63,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 55,000
Funded by InfrasbudUrelTrunk 170,250 299,100 1,173,500 299,000 850,000 150,000 150,000
Funded by debt 2,950,000
Total 275,250 354,100 1,236,500 3,299,000 700,000 205,000 205,000
IDeI>l _. ~-%!, Y" "fgil ~
RaJe 5.lJO% 5.00% 5,llO% 5.00% 5,llO% 5,.... 5,lJO% 5,lJO% 5,lJO% 5.00%
Tonn 10 10 10 10 10 10 15 15 15 15
MDS 284,210 0
Cumulative OS 284,210 284,210 284,210
CUrrent OS
WTP 739,438 741,393 746,720 745,663 748,228 749,439 754,221 757,507 759,440
17.5% of Connedion J Area Charges is used to support the WTP
170
CllY OF ANDOVER
Sewer System Financial Projections
AcbJal Actual Actual Estimate I Forecast
Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012
o Inflation Fador. expenses 3.00% 3.00% 3,00% 3,00% 3.00% 3,00% 3,00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
Acres Added 65 65 50 50 35 35 35 35 35 35
New Connections 200 200 150 150 100 100 100 100 100 100
New Customers 200 200 150 150 100 100 100 100 100 100
Total Services 6,995 6.996 7.656 7,828 7,928 8,028 8,128 8,228 8.328 8,428
Rates
Base Rate 46.00 47,84 49,75 51.74 53,81 55,96 58.20 60.53 62,95 65,47
Use Rate
Connection Charge 341 351 361 372 387 402 418 435 452 470
Area Charge 1,252 1.302 1.340 1,379 1,434 1,491 1,551 1,613 1,678 1,745
Connection/Area 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Base Rate 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
Use Rate 0% 0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
IOperations =ff.2 l!l'OOll<! =L, ~\1al ~I""" ~ ~
Revenues
Base Use 1,287,168 1,338,825 1,523,475 1.620,000 1,706.423 1,796.988 1,892,198 1,992,163 2.096,990 2,207,125
Penalties 22,416 18,914 19,646 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Interest (1.416) 4.016 33,601 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Other 7,527 7,624 5.000 5,000
Total 1.308,168 1,368,282 1,584,346 1,685.000 1,771,423 1,856,988 1.952,198 2,052,163 2,156,990 2,267,125
Expenses
Operations 986,413 988,704 1.139,365 1,248,434 1,307,458 1,346,682 1,387,082 1,428,695 1,471,555 1,515.702
Debt Service 410,873 7,000 7,000
Capital OuUay 61,173 5.000 300,000
Replacement Reserve 390,000 400,000 300.000 350,000 350,000 400,000 400,000 450,000 500,000
Total 1,787,286 1,395.704 1,207,538 1,553,434 1,657,458 1,996,682 1,787,082 1,828,695 1,821.555 2,015.702
Balance ~ Unrestricted
Annual SurplusJDefic:it (479,118) (26,422) 376.808 131,566 113.965 (139,694) 165,116 223,468 235,435 251,423
FB 12/3112000
Balance 1,268,468 1,242.046 1,618,854 1.750,420 1,864.385 1,724,691 1,889,807 2,113,275 2,348,710 2.600,133
IlnfrastructurefTrunk ,- ~ =<<,ji[~ o!t@-'t'I![[rt "'---- .--: t%iii!,__ ! CB TIlr!B
Revenues
Connection Charges 246,773 385,173 . 350.165 100,000 38.700 40,200 41,800 43,500 45.200 47,000
0 AreaCha'lles 50,190 52,185 54,285 56,455 58,730 61.075
Interest 34,135 39.185 37.532 45.000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45.000 45,000
Replacement Reserve 390.000 400,000 300,000 350,000 350,000 400,000 400,000 450,000 500.000
Special Assessments 331,507 16.959 94.484 40,000 40.000 40,000 40,000 300,000 300,000
Ofher 72.228 48,122
Total 1,002.415 913,545 530,303 485.000 523.890 527,385 581.085 544,955 898,930 953,075
Expenses
Debt Service 127,957 463.254 453,266 453,266 453,266
Capital Outlay 144.377 207,904 455,017 523.900 207.000 520,500 n 4,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
Total 272,334 671,158 455,017 523,900 207,000 520,500 774,000 603,266 603.266 603,266
Balance
Annual Surplus/Deficit 730,081 242,387 75,286 (38.900) 316,890 6,685 (192,915) (58.311) 295,664 349,809
FB 12/3112000
Balance 741.739 984.126 1,059,412 1,020,512 1,337,402 1,344,287 1.151,372 1,093,061 1,388.725 1,738.534
ICapltal Projects 1= =~Jtj: - """'" ~ - -
Infrastructure
New Development Projects 170,250 175,500 120,500 124,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
Crosstown Blvd Trunk 353,650 400.000
Yellow Pine Lift: Station 650,000
Uft Station #1 Upgrage 25,000
MSA Routes ~ New I Reconstruct 6,500
Rural Reserve Sanitary Trunk. 3,500,000
Equipment
GPS 5.000
Jet Vac Truck 300,000
Total 528,900 207,000 820,500 774.000 3,650,000 150.000 150,000
Funded by Operations 5.000 300.000
Funded by InfrastructurefTrunk 523.900 207,000 520,500 774.000 150,000 150,000 150.000
Funded by debt 3.500,000
528.900 207,000 820,500 774,000 3,650.000 150,000 150,000
100b! ~e =:<J:tQ'~~~ ~N ~ . ~=- n -
0 Interest Rate 5.00% 5,00% 5.00% 5,00% 5.00% 5.00% 5,00% 5.00% 5,00% 5,00%
Term 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
OS Annualized 453.266
Total Annual Debt Service 453,266 453,266 453,266
171
.0
This page left blank intentionally.
~
-'
o
172
o
e
o
fj)
CITY OF
NDOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
, Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM:
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT:
2007 Budget Update
DATE
November 28, 2006
INTRODUCTION
The Council has had a number of reviews of the City of Andover 2007 Proposed Budget and continued
detailed review of the General Fund budget that is primarily supported by the proposed 2007 Tax Levy, At
the last workshop meeting: (October 24. 2006. minutes attached) it appeared there were no remaining
questions relative to what had been presented to date.
This year the Andover City Council is again required bv State Statute to hold a Truth in Taxation public
hearing. This hearing is intended to g:ive the public the opportunity to comment on the proposed 2007
budget and tax levy. That hearing will be held as part of the December 5. 2006 regular City Council
meeting.
The Council did adopt a Preliminary 2007 Tax Levy and General Fund Budget at the September 5, 2006
Council meeting. The Preliminary 2007 Budget proposed a total property tax levy of $9,316,427:
$6,115,179 (65,6%) operational levy, $1,833,494 (19.7%) debt service levy, and $1,367,754 (14.7%) capital
levy. The Council has the right to reduce or keep constant this levy until the final .certification date of
December 28. 2006.
DISCUSSION
The following items identify sections of the budget that have been updated since the last workshop meeting
with the Council. Updates are underlined:
Personnel Related Implications:
A total salary compensation adjustment package is proposed to provide wages that are competitive with
other government entities. The Human Resources Manager continues to indicate that 2007 wage proposals
in other communities for a cost-of-living increase are ranging from 3% to 4%, Finance/Administration is
currently utilizing a 3.5% cost-of-living increase for the proposed 2007 Budget for union and non union
employees. Human Resources and Administration have met with the Public Works Union and based on the
wage increase in the proposed budget have a tentative agreement on the wage negotiation portion of the
Union agreement.
Community SchoolsNouth First/Community Center After School Programs
Council requested a report on the activities of Community School and requested that Community Schools
provide information on what would happen if City of Andover Funding was eliminated. That was done at
the September 26th Workshop. The Council also indicated a desire to see if additional funds could be
1
o
o
o
sought for Youth First if they continued to provide services to the Community Center After School
Programs. Based on the emplovee heath insurance renewal (forecasted at 15%. negotiated to around 5%).
funds will be available and can be used to assist the Community Center Ooerations in providing the After
School Program service either through Youth First or City staffing ($8,000),
Other Information:
The attachments to this staff report are handouts that will be representative of information that will be
discussed at the December 5, 2006 Truth in Taxation Hearing.
Miscellaneous Budget Graphs and Charts (Pgs, 5-10)
Sample Truth in Taxation Hearing Staff Report (Pgs. 11-26)
The intent behind providing the Truth in Taxation Hearing information at this time is to assure that what is
presented at the hearing will answer questions that the Council mav have.
ACTION REOUESTED
The Council is requested to review the staff report, attachments and provide direction to staff,
Attachments
2
o
o
o
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes - October 24, 2006
Page 3
tc\ ?l.\
LL
----
the City in the next few weeks. He reviewed what had been done to date,
Councilmember Orttel asked if it was possible to widen and shoulder the street in the future when it
would be State Aid eligible. City Engineer Berkowitz responded that was a possibility.
2007-2011 CIP UPDATESffRAIL SYSTEM DISCUSSION
City Engineer Berkowitz requested Council review the proposed trail map and direct staff on trail
improvements for the 2007-2011 Capital Improvement Plan.
Councilmember Trude suggested whoever is writing the newsletter, should put in an update on the
Hanson Boulevard trail.
Councilmember Knight stated they should try and have a crossing up by the schools and City Hall.
Councilmember Trude stated she supported the trail on the north side of Crosstown, She indicated
there are a lot of children walking in this area all year long.
Councilmember Jacobson asked if they could have some trails in the City that were not blacktopped.
The consensus of Council was to do the trail on the north side of Crosstown.
Councilmember Trude asked if they could look at six-foot trails instead of eight-foot trails. City
Engineer Berkowitz responded they could not go less than eight-foot trails. He indicted if the trails
were classified as a sidewalk, they could go down to five feet.
City Administrator Dickinson noted once you get below eight feet, it is so labor intensive there was
no cost savings.
Councilmember Trude stated if a trail is really expensive, they might want to look at putting in a
sidewalk instead of a trail.
Mayor Gamache indicated they could put a sidewalk on one side and a trail on the other side. City
Engineer Berkowitz stated they could do a comparison, but noted the trail fee would not be used for
a sidewalk.
Councilmember Orttel stated they could change the ordinance, which would allow trail fees to pay
for sidewalks.
2007 BUDGET UPDATEIENTERPRISE FUNDS AND COMMUNITY CENTER
City Administrator Dickinson stated the Council has had a number of reviews of the 2007 Proposed
Budget that would be supported by the 2007 Tax Levy, At the last meeting, only a few questions
(j)
o Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes - October 24, 2006
Page 4
remained and those questions will be addressed through the discussion.
Councilmember Jacobson asked for next year would the buildings be self-sufficient. City
Administrator Dickinson responded the City is still going to have to subsidize until 2009, when
everything would be cut in half, if not more,
Councilmember Jacobson stated he is concerned the City would be subsidizing this for the next five
years with taxpayer money. City Administrator Dickinson responded there would always be some
services that are subsidized because the City would be providing a community service.
Recreational Facilities Manager Sutherland updated the Council on the Community Center budget.
He indicated in the future they could increase revenues in the advertising area,
Councilmember Knight stated they might want to think about charging a nominal amount for the
room fees, even if the organization is non-profit. Recreational Facilities Manager Sutherland noted
they could charge a small annual fee for room rental.
c
Councilmember Orttel stated he would like to see more daytime room rentals by profit organizations.
Councilmember Jacobson stated he is not opposed to the fee, based on what the fee would be.
Mayor Gamache suggested they figure out what it is costing in staff time to set up the rooms, how
much revenue they are receiving from the room rental fee, and then Council could determine if the
City should continue to subsidize this. Recreational Facilities Manager Sutherland noted the rooms
are being used so much that they also have to consider the replacement of the chairs and tables,
Recreational Facilities Manager Sutherland stated their largest expense is utilities.
Councilmember Trude noted Dean Hanson is the only person who gave $100,000.00. She believes
Council had wanted a room named after him, Recreational Facilities Manager Sutherland responded
Conference Room A was actually the Hanson room and they would put a plaque by this room in
acknowledgem~nt.
)
City Administrator Dickinson summarized the 2007 Enterprise Funds budget.
CHARITABLE GAMBLING ORDINANCE RESEARCH UPDATE
o
City Administrator'Dickinson stated the City has a Gambling Ordinance that guides charitable
gambling within the City. At a recent meeting, the Council was asked to review the Ordinance by a
local sports association. At the October 3, 2006 Council meeting, the Council directed staff to
survey some other communities. He summarized what other communities are doing.
Councilmember Jacobson stated the issue is that they need more facilities.
(0
1:'
UJ Om
"0 o Ol ::;:
0 c: ..... ..... -
" N ..... -
"- cOr--: c: -
c:
1l 000 '" '"
.....00 E E
r-- - '~ .,..,. a.
'5 '"
'" Ui Ui C)
(j) '" ~ e- '"
" " w c:
Iii c:.i3 '"
c: '" .- ~ ::;:
UJ S >"0 I 1:' ""
"0 '" c:
c: oS (l:2i '" UJ
" X () a::
"- w
- e:-
'" -
]2
Ci.
e fil~
a. 00>
UJ crSro
"0
c: c:5a; "0
" c:
"- MM "
"-
- - '" .,..,.
UJ ~
';:: Ui Ui "0 "0
l?- '" ~ c: c:
" " " '"
.sl c:.i3 "- "- (j)
c: '" .- i ~ E
w >"0
'" c: ro
(l:2i .9
x (j) ~ (j)
w
Gl
0-
>-
I-
"'C
C
0:: :l
wu.
>(;J
-~
<( E
u.E
O:l
>-0)
1-....
_ Gl
Ocl
"'C
:l
D:l
....
o
o
N
o
UJ
"0
c:
"
"-
"0
.sl
'"
Cl
"0
"
al
",;0
<0'"
~~
ON
~o;;
o;;N
N'"
.,.
.. U)
UJ ~
'" "
,,-
:n:a
> c:
'" '"
(l:~
-w
"'-
e!!!
f-- 0
f--
,
~
~
"0
c:
<(
'0
.?>
C3
~
-
f-
-
UJ
"0
c:
"
"-
]j
c:
'"
E
E
~
(!)
-
-
-
-
UJ
"0
c:
"
"-
UJ
U
'"
'e-
a.
]j
"5.
'"
()
.....<0
....N
....00
roo
0> 00
Olo>
..00:)
.,..,.
en Ui
'" '"
~.a
~=c
'" c:
(l:2i
x
w
UJ
"0
c:
"
"-
1l
'~
'"
(j)
:E
'"
Cl
Ol'"
0>00
0>0
~af
..... ~
<OOl
..o.q:
.,..,.
en en
'" '"
" ~
ffi:e
>"0
'" c:
(l:2i
x
w
UJ
"0
c:
~
'"
"
c:
'"
>
'"
(l:
Iii
'(3
'"
a.
(j)
Olo>
..... N
.....'"
~ c~,-
N .....
~~
~~
en U:i
'" '"
" ~
ffi:E
>"0
'" c:
(l:2i
x
w
"0
c:
"
"-
~
'"
c:
'"
(!)
........
..........
0l0l
~--.:i
0> 0>
"''''
o:f as
.,..,.
(,) en
'" '"
" ~
c:.i3
~:a
'" c:
(l:2i
x
w
UJ
U
'"
'e-
a.
.J!J "0
() c:
'" 0
"e'm-6 ~
~lo...xa..O)c:.o:= en
c:~c:"O:2Q)E~.o2
::l Q) ::l Q) m .- Q) 0
~cn~g ~~'5'z
lo... '-(Q06gCl"-m
Q)E~c:"O-~a..~
ro..9 Cl) ~ ~ ~ rn ~ g-
~(j)(j):J(l:f--o.o.()
UJ UJ
"0 -g
5~ cn$l cn~
~a-g~(J) -g"E
55m~~2 OQ)
Eg>"Ca5~.{g!D~
Q).-.-u c:Q)_
e~ ~ .9- ~ ~ ~ ~
a.E'aiE S-g-g;; a> x
_(l:(j)W()o.(l:~
qqqqqq;3q
(!)(!)(!)(!)(!)(!)W(!)
Cl
c:
'"
6 ~
g> :;:::~Q)()lo... ~
"0.. ~=~(ijS:O
g. 05Cf.)CVC E
'00:: c. Q) en Q)
..::::: U)::a::::c:(J co
011 ~E ,Q'?> (!)
<vO .....O).Q.t).c Q)
Cl::;: e:- f-- ::;: i5- "" :0
~- ~ en 06 W ~ E c> f9
<('cuO::: ~=$' a.c: ECC ~
C11o...a::::o~OmooO..c
~q-;l,+f-;"~<t<tc.rY((
@
o
Lexington
Circle Pines
MUNICIPALITIES WITHIN ANOKA COUNTY
Proposed 2007 City Tax Rate Comparison
Municipalities Only
Bethel
Hilltop
Spring Lake Park
Centerville
Ramsey
Col~mbia Heights
~
==
rr;
~
o
~
>;
~
6
o
Lino Lakes
St. Francis
Columbus
Fridley
Andover
Easl Bethel
Coon Rapids
Oak Grove
Ham Lake
Linwood
Anoka
Blaine
Burns
0,000
20,000
40,000
60,000
TAX RATE
80,000
100,000
w'...,.
<,:'i~ '
~'"~~ ~ ,
o
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
2007 Proposed Tax Rate Breakdown
Olher
4.33%
School Dislrict
22.83%
City
36.61%
PERCENTAGES ARE PROPORTIONAL TO REFLECT 100% RATHER THAN ACTUAL AMOUNT OF 84.686%.
Q)
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
2007 Revenue Comparison - General Fund
Inlerest Income
Misc. Revenue 1 %
License & perlrWls
7%
Inlergovernmental
Revenues
7%
Fines & Forfeils
Transfers 1 %
2%
Charges for Services
g%
Property Taxes
72%
o
o
~
o
o
o
Facililies Mgm
17%
expenditures by function
Public Works
27.84%
CITY OF ANDOVER
2007 Expenditures by Function
Other
0.23%
General Government
29.44%
C't CI kEleclions
I y er 0%
6% Administration
7%
Human Resources
5%
Public Safety
42.48%
general government expenditures
Engineering
17%
Council Newsletter
4% 1%
Planning & Zoning
15%
Attorney
7%
Finance
12%
@
o
o
o
public safety expenditures
Fire Proleclion
28%
Proteclive Inspeclion
13%
Civil Defense
1%
Animal Conlrol
0%
public works expenditures
Parks & Recrealion
35%
Recycling
4%
Slreets & Highways
24%
Streel Lights - Billed
7% Traffic Signals
1%
Street Signs
7%
Slreet Lighling
1%
@
o
o
o
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755.5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW,CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM:
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator / Finance Director
SUBJECT:
Truth in Taxation Hearing - 2007 Budget
DATE:
December 5, 2006
INTRODUCTION
This year the Andover City Council is required to hold Truth in Taxation meetings, These meetings give the
public the opportunity to comment on the proposed 2007 budget and tax levy.
DISCUSSION.
The first hearing date (December 5, 2006) selected by the City Council is for the initial hearing to present the
proposed levy and budget to the public. If the initial hearing is not sufficient for all public comment and further
discussion is required, a continuation hearing will be necessary, The date and time of continuation hearing must be
announced before the close of the initial hearing. The continuation hearing must occur at least 5 but no more than
14 business days after the initial hearing, If a continuation hearing is not necessary, the City must announce the
date and time of a subsequent hearing for the official adoption of the final levy and budget. The announcement
must be made prior to the end of the initial hearing,
Attached is some basic fmancial data that will be reviewed with the Council at the meeting as listed:
Pg,l
Pg,2
Pg,3
Pg,4
Pg,5-10
Pg.ll
Pg, 12
Pg,13-15
Truth in Taxation Advertisement
Valuation Estimates
2007 Budget Summary By Fund Type
2007 Budget Summary By Revenue and Expenditure Type
2007 Budgets By Fund Type
2007 General Fund Revenues By Type
2007 General Fund Expenditures By Function,
Resolution to Approve 2007 Budget and Tax Levy
A more detailed presentation that will be provided at the hearing similar to past budget workshops,
ACTION REOUIRED
The Andover City Council is requested to review the attached fmancial data in preparation for the Truth-in-
Taxation hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Dickinson
Attachments
6D
Notice of Proposed
Total Budget and Property Taxes
The Andover City Council will hold a public hearing on its budget and on the
amount of property taxes it is proposing to collect to pay for the costs of
services the City will provide in 2007.
SPENDING: The total budget amounts below compare the City's 2006 total
actual budget with the amount the City proposes to spend in 2007.
2006 Total
Actual Budget
$24,489,927
Proposed 2007
Budget
$22,016,231
Change from
2006 - 2007
<10.10>%
TAXES: The property tax amounts below compare that portion of the current
budget levied in property taxes in the City of Andover for 2006 with the
property taxes the City proposes to collect in 2007.
2006
Property Taxes
$8,517,523
Proposed 2007
Property Taxes
$9,281,427
Change from
2006 - 2007
8.97%
LOCAL TAX RATE COMPARISON: The following compares the City's
current local tax rate, the City's tax rate for 2007 if no tax levy increase is
adopted, and the City's proposed tax rate for 2007.
2006
Tax Rate
31.556%
2007 Tax Rate if
NO Levy Increase
28.106%
2007 Proposed
Tax Rate
31.003%
Attend the Public Hearing
All Andover city residents are invited to attend the public hearing of the City
Council to express their opinions on the budget and on the proposed amount
of 2007 property taxes. The hearing will be held on:
Tuesday, December 5, 2006, at 7:00 p.m.
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
You are also invited to send your written comments to:
City of Andover, Mayor's Office
1685 Crosstown Blvd NW, Andover, MN. 55304
1
~
" co r::- N ... co'#-
0 lZ., (; N N co ... 0"
CO ... " " "'...
" N N .. .. 0 LOo
u ::> '" CO e " 0 ,,~
{2. to-
..... " ... '" '" CO "
to> en ci oi ri en 0
I:) N N N 0
N
" .,. .,. >.
<> ..
'ii 0 Il.
.s ...
0 '#- '#- '#-
II,; .. 0 '" " "-
ll. ~ ., ~ '" "!
.. Oi oi 0> ..,: ..; ~
:is .. N c: ~ ~ ~
"" ::> " to CO
.. ... iii 0 CD .c:
" to 0
{2. :e > N ::> () 0
CO iii N
N >'#- >.
~ to
.,. c:; Il.
.. III
Q. III
.. ::l
'" "' S 0 CO CO'#- () ..."'''' " ii
lZ.. '" CO 0> CO " '" ~ " 0"'''' (; >
CO '" N " 0 CO" .. ~OCO
" u ::> ri .0 ....- 0 ri ri~ f- r6~ri N .::- '"
{2. to_ ... '" " (; '" ...~ "'CO'" '" Ol 0
t~ CO CO. t:. 0 0 "'...co "- 0
oi :=. .. ri ....- OMcO en .. N
I:) N N N NNN N Cl. >.
.. ..
.,. .,. .,..,..,. .,. to) Il.
CD "
0
0 ..
... 0 V LO-CO " l-
000 0
to 0 000 0
ll. "l C'\INNN
., ~ >.>.>.>. ...
Oi .. 0> .. .. .. .. 0
:is '" 0.. a.. 0.. 0.. 0
.. "" ::> ri N
... m
" to ... >.
.. :e > '" ..
f- N Il.
.,.
0 0 0 <> 0 0
'" 0 <> 0 0 0 0
.! '" N N 0> 'l"""~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 .;.
to ... 0; '" 0 CO" 0 0 0 0 0 0
a: .E lZ.. o. N 0 ". " ..." 0 0 0 0 0 0
.. .0 oi cON 0 0 0 0 0 0
C w iO " u ::> ~ ;;; 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0
> .. ..- co ;;;. 0> '" o~
W f- ..... ... !e- N. 0> N '" N N ~ .,.
0 c: .. > ",' ~ ~ N' .. .,. .,. .,. .,. .,.
c .5! I:) N N N
Z
<( OJ '" .,. .,.
II.. ::> 0
om <>
>-> ...
... 0
f-" to 0
_ 0 Il. CO
1:)0
N .. Oi oi
... :is ., CO
.. to "" ::> N "
ll. ... m .. 0
" to
to :e > ... 0
f- N N
N >.
..
.,. Il.
... ~ r::- ... '#- '#- ~
'" ... CO 0
lZ.. 0 co ... 0> '" N CD 0> ... 0 co
~ ... ~ ... '" CO 0 '" 0> .
oi .. ....- .. N co' 0> ..,: ..; 0 0
" u ::> c: 0
.. .. - '" CO CO 0 co co .. ~ ~ ~ N
f- ~:: '" "'- e co CO "':. ., .c: >.
0 :=. <Ii N ~ ::> () ..
I:) N ~ N iii '#- Il.
> '"
... .,. .,. a; ..
<> ::l
<> -l: ii
... ..
0 :;: 0 000 > '"
.. 0 CD 0 000 ... 0
ll. "'. "l. CON~ ., 0
.. :E cO~cri "" N
: C;; .. C;; ...
:is .. 1ii COO>N .. >.
.. ::> 0 o. N"''' :IE '"
... iii ....- f- ..... ..jCf)-O Il.
" ..
to :e > co COv.N '"
f- 0>. Q)~ N~ LO~ ao~. :is
'l"""NNN ..
"
.,. .,..,..,. .,. ..
f- ...
0
0
... ",co " N
000 0 >.
c: 0 00 0 '"
.51 c: N NNN Il.
'" E '5 52 >- >. >. >.
iii '5 .. .. .. '"
"5 CD € € '" Il. Il.Il.Il.
E '"
f- E ::> CD
0 c: ~ 0 iii c;; ::> 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 iii 0 0 0 0 0 0
.51 u () > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 .;.
m .EO ~ oS ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
::> " 'C 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
iii '" lii .. lii CD 0 0 0 0 0 0
rr c;; I
> f- Q. Q. 0 0 0 0 0 0
'C '" 1ii '" ::> 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ CD 15 15 '5' 0 '" 0 "'. o. '"
> !5 f- <: ri N N .,.
0 iii iii iii ;;; ;;;
'C Q. u " u iii ... ... ... I
c: .. '" 0 '" "5
<: () u: ...J u: f-
2 6)
o
c
o
~
llJ
E
E
:I
I/)
"" ~-g
.... llJ :I
wEu..
> E III
o :I !
o I/) :I
Z .... ~
< Gl 'tl
u.. Cll C
O 'tl Gl
:I Co
>- ll:l ><
!::: t-- W
ug-g
N llJ
III
Gl
:I
C
Gl
>
Gl
c::
....
Glt--
CJlo
"00
dlN
.s
Ill~
EO
,_ 0
(j)N
W
"0
.s~
Q,O
00
"ON
<l:
0;..,
=0
....0
~N
....
'"
....
N
'"
'"
N
N
~O>O>....CCO
........"'~lO,..
O>...."'~ON
-i-i-ir15rrirri
"'N"''''~tO
lO"'CCO> to""
a5~tOtOrt'>~
U>
....
...
...
ui
..,
'"
10"
N
CCNCCO~CC
O>"'O"'NO
"'N"'lOo>r-
ci-.:i1.00-~~
~~~"'r-N
r-~~Or-r-
r-:~rDa)ri
U>
....
...
...
ui
'"
10
10'
N
<r-CO__~NO
r-o> lO 0>"'0
__CDMMCOO
rt5 cti 1O~ rti ,..: ...--
tONClClNO>
CO...-LO tl)'llt CO
"':~c6o;M
U>
...
o
....
o
~
...
ui
...
__CON"""CCCD
O'>QOCONC\?LO
O~~ClNtO
-ic:ic:irrir-:r15
__Na:>c:::>LON
"'N~"''''r-
"":~cC~ri
"""
U>
~
~
al
=
I:
III
.,
c:
...
al
W
II)
Gl
e
=
o
II)
...
Gl
.c: Gl
o E -E ~
ll/l Q) Gl .!E..O "2:
fV.S::! (l)
Xl c::~r:t~CI)
~--Q) .~-
c: ~.m CI)! !:- ~
~~~:c'a.JBCii
QlQ)Q.Q)mc=-
C::(!)CI)OUUJ-=
....
Gl
c::
Gl
<>
I:
al
OJ
l!l
"0
I:
=
u..
10
...
CO
-i
o
"""
ui
N
~
'"
o
.n
...
"""
~
N
...
~
~
N
N
....
~
N
N
<0
o
=
<0
~
o
...
iIi
Gl
<>
...
=
o
II)
...
Gl
.c:
o
ll/l
II)
Gl
=
I:
~
CIl
c::
]
o
!-
N
...
...
,.:
'"
o
~
~
~"'lOCC~O>
r-NtONCCr-
o>"'OtO",r-
-ir.<ioic:ir15r-:
('l')..........-CO...-O
"'CCCl"'O>O:>
ct5 T""~ .q: a:i ~
....
...
~.
....
'"
...
~"
..,
CC"''''CCNN
",o",r-OtO
ccr-"'..,~o>
ri"":~';~o)
O~"'CCr-lO
O:>CCOCl~r-
"":~"":O"M"
"""
o
CO
....
=
....
...
~.
'"
N..,,,,,...r-O
...-COMOCOIO
o>OtO"""'Cl
rri rri -i N .0 0>-
O"'NO>~lO
C)v C)co co,....
,....- ~ cD CJ')- C")-
10
CO
,...
CO'
'"
....
'....
...
O)__C)...-NCO
"'CCN~tOlO
...-CONNO)Q)
~<<:iN~NCD-
...-COvOt---N
~tO..,o:>tOr-
,...:~ci,......N
""" """
a;
:E
.!!
'ii
~
]
o
!-
II)
CIl
II)
:::l
...
CIl
.c:
o
ll/l ~ Ul Q)
= ~Q)~.2
'- > O'~ 2=
::l Q).- 0 Q) Q)
:!: c::~r:tUlCl)
"00;- Gl '1:-
c:~.~C/)1ijc.~
!.~ ~:c:a~ <<;
~~~~8Jj:E
3
....
..,
'"
~.
...
N
=
N
....
....
....
..;
...
CO
o
N
U>
~
...
...
=
'"
'"!.
....
...
,...
'"
....
N"
'"
'"
N
N
U>
~
....
o
....
...
....
o
...
co
o
....
N
"""
'"
r.<i
N
U>
CO
~
~
N
~
"!.
....
~
,...
...
...
ui
'"
'"
",'
N
U>
iIi
Gl
II)
:::l
...
Gl
.c:
o
ll/l
III
e
:I
....
'5
I:
CIl
Q,
><
w
]
o
!-
~
...
...
Gl
,Q
E
Gl
<>
Gl
Q
c:
"-
III
W
....
Gl
c::
-
CIl
<>
I:
III
OJ
l!l
"0
I:
=
u..
@
o
o
a: ~
W E
> =:
o 5
or/)
Z
<C
IJ..
o
~
U
..
Gl
Cll
'Cl
:l
l:O
to-
o
o
N
'ii 3
E "E
.!l ..
.Ern
Gl
Q.
>-
...
'Cl
c:
::s
IJ..
>-
..Cl
II)
l!!
.a
:s
:::
Gl
Q.
0(
W
'Cl
c:
III
II)
Gl
::s
:::
Gl
>
CIl
a:
-.!l
.fI "
- ..
ft~
t.l ~
...
s
..
I-
..
III
'C
Cl.
~
.!
e
w
'"
:g~
Q ..
rn
'i a
i CD
...>
rn~
!
9!
a;
C!l
I'-
..
I'-
N
..
..
N
N
....
I'-ON
NOO>
1'-00
00"
"'Ncg
"''''....
ai~~
OM=OCOCOOOOON
"'CO~OCOlt)OOO(l")N
MNCOtOt---~OOONt--
N tIi ~ ~ N ~ u; to L6 r-: .......
ro-NMO)t--.....N oQ''''II:tN
ll)'lll'~ ",co Nm
~ as 'P""
N
o 0
I'- 0
.....~ I It)
~ ....-
0:>
I'-
0>
~
~
..
'"
cg
,.;
OOOOID
ooooco
ooo\X)~
10 16 10 aJh =
'" .... CD
I'-
,.;
C")ooC")
''It'OO~
COIl')O~
OtDO~"':
vMO....
OCOlO'l""
M ~
co
I'-
N
~
CD
I'-
;:
cg
.-:
'"
I'-
....
~
.;
co
....
.;
0000
OOOQ
C:Oll)O~
r--:rDO";
O>MOM
C")COtOyt
~
~
I'-
CD
,.:
II)
II)
N
cg
~
CD
~
It)
CD
CD
..
co
~
~
N
co
I'-
N
~
CD
I'-
CD
II)
co
~
....
CD
",.
t;
....
=
'"
'"
~
'"
'"
'"
..
I'-
cg
.,;
'"
I'-
I'-
.....
N
"!.
~
...
I'-
'"
.;
'"
10
=
N
cg
cg
,.:
'"
co
'"
...
~N",""COOCOCD
t-Mc:ot--OvQ
vCOONICt-CD
cO cO 0 "11th ~ "IIft'~ f"i
(l?ll')~C")Q)CO~
1O..-0MvtCl''P'"
tci'..-rit--.:'NlOU)
N
..
I'-
I'-
,.:
co
co
o
'"
....
N
~
'" '"
cg",
to I'-
lOt-:
....'"
1'-'"
,.;
'"
....
cg
Q
....
co
,.;
10
N
CD
Q
CD
10
...
....
'"
..
co
N
N
....
I'-
co
.,;
'"
N
~
II)
It)
..
'"
N
<is
'"
~
~
~
,.;
cg
co
Q
N
....
I'-
I'-
co
.,;
'"
N
....
10
CD
"!.
~
N
'"
,.;
....
o
0:>
"!.
~
'"
'"
,.;
~
....ON
"'00>
1'-00
r-: 0-"';-
"'Ncg
..-..- v_
to
cg
....
c>>
....
'"
....
~
N
0>
'"
ocg
0'"
o~
~cD
0>1'-
",cg
N
..
I'-
.;
I'-
N
,.;
I'- I'-
.... ....
'" 10
c> a;
0> ..
'" '"
N N
~
~
N
N
~
~
;15
"''''
NN
~O
"''''
0'"
"''''
"'....'
r:rS~
"''''
'"
N
0:>
'"
.,;
I'-
~
~
"''''
0:>'"
00
C>>a;
~ ~
0> ..
~"ft"
..
...
...
<is
'"
"'.
~
...
I'-
..
..
'"
10
=
'"
....
....
,.:
o
co
co
CD
'"
.;
~
N
....
o
l;;
~
CD
"!.
~
...0
"'0
....0
MO
"'0
co_ N..
0:>
0>
"'.
;;:
'"
'"
I'-
o
..
'"
'"
o
o
0:>
..
'"
0'"
01'-
"'I'-
.0 ....
"''''
~"!.
~
'"
'"
cg
.,;
'"
~
~
N
...
1'-'
CD
~
,.:
toO
",0
~ '"
oe>
"''''
1'-'"
....
...
CD
'"
=
~
'"
","
I'-
II)
o
'"
...
N
,.;
....
CD
CD
...
'"
CD
~
~
o
o
o
.,;
....
'"
0000
ll)"'IttC>o
~~~lt)_
.....0>(0)
"'''''''
0'"
"'..
'" '"
co" r;
"'..
'"
=
I'-
N
I'-
'"
CD
CD
'"
~
ONO
00:>0
o",cg
0="':
"''''~
Ol'"
MN"
....
CD
N
CD
Q
CD
'"
=
~
o
'"
=
CD
...-
~
~
....
I'-
'"
N
=
...
~
,.;
0>
I'-
....
-.i:
~
.;
o
o
o
Q
0>"
'"
o
'"
0'
..
'"
~
I'-
..
N
..
~
..
N
IO"-Vo>O
.q-OOQ:lO
......"It 01 0>
r-: 0 ~ .. ri
...- 0 l.."'l.....
v......,....q-N
....
CD
co
o
'"
~
'"
.;
...
N
~
~
N
o
N
....
~
~
N
,.;
co
"!.
~
~
0> ~
"''''
"'~
cri~
'" 0:>
0"'
..
1'-1'-
"'0:>
.... 0
r-:r-:
"'0:>
"'0
N-
....
'"
N
'"
,.;
I'-
CD,
~
...
N
I'-
Q
...
I'-
....
...
I'-
..
..
'"
II)
=
I'-
'"
N
<is
..
~
,.;
....
~
'"
in in in -
in ..
~ .. .. .. ...
" " .. III E
III ,., ~ - ~ ::l
.. t .. .. .= Gl
e " .. .. '" ~ "
.. ...rn rn " :;; " ..
.., e '" ~ e> e ... Q
.. 0
'" III CL e .. '" ... 'S
.: I!l '" .E 'Ou ... III ... .. 0 ... .:
~ III !!J III " 0 ]I 0 W e -
.. '" :: - e III "
E lI) in .. r!! " .. r!! ..
W I- " " a; lI) ... '" W
lI) a; m "~ E .. .. oS! m e ... III 10 " e :$ oS! III
... ~ E III rn ii: e !l '"
co III :: .. .. '" " "~ '" ! i
III CL lI) e =,.1: III ::E
a:: " :: III " " III III ... E - III a; "2: lI) '" ,., e c .=
... "C E V) .0; .. " e e '" !l ~
Gi lI) " lI) > lI) .. co "C V) ~ !l Gl Gi
0 .. E '" c e ~ :: e> '" .. .. -.; l- ll) -= ... .. :is III lI) c "2: 'S ... :;;
" c: '" '" a; .E " co a:: e "," 0 e .!! ! V) .. "C "~ 0 e "
e e <t III III lI) l!! lI) III e .. .E e '" co m III lI) co 0 III '" Gl e
.. .. E " > E u- ,lg ~ "C S c .= III lI) Gl :S ..
ii .. " ~ III 0 lI) C3 r!! ii e e "- " > e .92 ~ V) mV) S III ... ii
.. .0; e> 0> III .. "e m ] c; ii: !l Gl ~ :;; 0 "5.-5 ~ ::l '" ..
m lI) " e ~ a; .!B "C 0 a:: r!! lI) :s.:c 0 a; w m
e e .. ~.~ .! " lI) Q; e III I- ~ lI) e 0 l- e ... ~ ... I- -
"C .. " .. C3 c > '" " lI) :E ~ ... 0 c: ii S co lI) .. .. 0 "' lI) Gl Q. S ."
e > C!l I- V)..J .0; u: .5 ::> ::E CL CL 0 m c; ~o.. V) CL 0 Cl ... 0 e
.. .. 0 " ~ " ..
u. a:: l- I- W 0 I- u.
4 @
o
o
Gl
(J
c:
ell
'i
l%I
'tS
c:
=
u..
c:
.-
III
Gl
'tSg'
c: ell
=..c:
u..u
"''i'tS
Gl ... c:
> Gl ell
o c: III
'tSc: ,~ Gl
"'" ...
<.=
...._:!::
OGl'tS
~O)C:
._ 'tS Gl
U ~ e-
,...,w
Q ~
Q III
N Gl
=
c:
Gl
>
Gl
IX:
....
o
-
c:
Gl
E
S
ell
-
U)
o
I'-
C')
N
rD
'0:1'
....
M
4R-
Clooooooen
1'-10 '0:1' 1000M'o:I'
VMCOWIOOIOC')
V.N'N'''':~'OcrJ'en
~I'-ClOClClCO'o:l'
~IOIOCO I')
cO rD
I'-
~
N
o
N
M
4R-
COIOMOOOOUl
VI'-NIOOOOen
NcrJI'-NIOOOC')
"':N'oN-aioM"en
COVCOOCOClCOUl
NcrJlOCO 10
.0 ~
I'-
I'-
'0:1'
N"
o
N
1')-
COOMOOOO....
V01'-10000l'-
NI'-ClcrJIOO~....
"':M"ltiair-:.olOrD
COcrJCONCOI'-COO
NIOIOW NIO
.0 ~
4R-
10
10
10
N
o
C')
M
4R-
CO W 1010 OION....
....MIOWMcrJNen
ClVVMIOIOCOO
O";M"M"o"':";en
IONIOMClCOOC')
IOl'-crJCl ~....
..; ~
....
~
Cll
=
C
Cll
.,
or
t.l
C
.!!!
Cll
m
"C
C
=
II..
In
Ol
~ ~ fC
I-E16t.)
~ Iii "EO "~
Ol C. Ol Ol
Q."C <= m
e c: t:: r....
II) c.. co E a
~ 16 !ll ~ !ll
C:r....rnoC)
C>>Q)C:~=UJ
&;ai~21:~
tl:Cl::iE0i:i:
Ol
'"
:::
Ol~in
g &! ~
g II) Iii
- 5 i::
~ Q) -
Ol<::tl:
EJl1
en Olt.) S
~"!!1 ~
E~
III
III
l:!
:IE
o f!:
r/).a!
.. In
CIl :::
.c tll
(5~
10
N
10
.:;
ll:I
....
'0:1' ....
I'- ....
en N
.,f C').
C') ll:I
10 lO_
rD ....
....
o
o
o
o
co
....
10 C')
en I'-
C') co.
en ....
'0:1' 10
I'- en
~ 0
....
o
o
o
o
co
....
.... ll:I
I'- '0:1'
~ 10
rD o.
co en
10 ll:I
~ 0
....
o
o
o
.:;
I'-
~
.... 10
en 10
o 10
.,f rD
.... ....
C') 10
1'-. 0
....
in
Gl
l:!
:I
o
r/)
..
Gl
.c
(5
'Cl
:::
ell
!ll Gi
'" :E
::: .!!!
~ "iii
~ ~
'i 'i
... ...
o 0
I- I-
5
Cl....I'-I'- '0:1'
NMNCO I'-
M....Vo'en
cO";":": .,f
NCOMCO C')
OIOCOO 10
..; N"': rD
crJlOClcrJ 10
ClMCO.... C')
v. 10. ~. v, ' 10
I'-vNCl M
IONcrJlO 0
1'-_10 IO.Cl ll:I
M N ~
crJ 10" v I'- N
CD~l!)v ~
vNo~'en
M"r-:v"N' rD
OI'-ClM 0
COMCOCO en
M" N ~
ClOONcoen
010 crJ crJCl I'-
o ND:) I'-N....
r-:cO 0 lti.,f.,f
~C'l"';ICOO'> or-
vcrJvco '0:1'
M" N" ~
III
16
.~ en
rn.!~
Ql tll .-
1Il"~ ~ ~
..Gl ~ "C J5
Ql <::
:lCf)tll"C
~ Q)
'Cl 16 II) II)
::: <::.21 t1l
Glo"C...c
c.~Q.~
0( Ql '" '"
wc.me.
III
Ql
~
~ in
o E
"C :I
<:: ...
tll :s
rn>.:::
~.!!! ~
.~ ::; ><
QlOW
~16'i
Q)::::'"
:5 fij- ~
00
"5
810
"ffI f!:
:::).a!
.. rn
CIl :::
.c t1l
(5~
'0:1'
I'-
en
.,f
C')
10
rD
I'-
C')
N
rD
'0:1'
....
1')'
4R-
10
C')
10
M
o
ll:I
1'-.
to-
C')
N
rD
'0:1'
....
1')'
4R-
N
....
en
10'
o
en
~
10
I')
I'-
M'
ll:I
en
N"
4R-
en
I'-
....
'0:1'-
....
'0:1'
~
I'-
I'-
'0:1'
N
o
N
M'
4R-
in
Gl
III
:::)
..
Gl
.c
...
o
"C
:::
III
III
l!!
:I
~
"C
:::
Gl
Q.
l(
W
'i
..
o
I-
....
M
..
III
.c
E
III
t.l
III
Cl
or
CJ
C
Cll
iii
m
"C
C
=
II..
@
o
(I)
Co)
c
.!!
C'Cl
En
Ul"
" c
c =
=u..
u.. c
(I) .-
= Ul
C (I)
(I) 0)
> c
(I) C'Cl
~D::..c
Cc;U
... = .- "
(l)u..Co)C
O~ (I) ~C'Cl
,,=U)Ul
C C (I)
<e(l).....:;
>.......
..... Q) I --
o D:: >-"
>._ ...- C
:::: C'Cl C'Cl (1)0.
U'U E
(I) E ><
0. W
U) = a
U) Ul
.. (I)
(I) =
ClC
" (I)
= >
m&!
"""....
o 0
0..
N C
(I)
E
.!
S
U)
o
CI:l
~
""
=
CI:l
Q~
....
o 0l000)
o r--OOto-
O'OCl:lOlto-
LO ~ ~ ci ""~
"" OlMLON
N CO "="'"'r">
....
.,.
0)
C"l
0)
N~
N
C"l~
....
NOCDOVN
OlONMCOC"l
CDONONN
N" Lri ...; ..: N. ""~
V LONO>....
N Ol .... ""~
....
.,.
0)
C"l
0)
N~
N
C"l~
....
NOCDOOCl:l
O>Or--MOO)
CDOCOCDLOCD
N" Lri ci N" CD- iii
V O>MvN
N CO "="'"'~
....
.,.
N
....
CO)
to-~
CI:l
O)~
....
Nr--....LOven
LOMLOVCOCD
O>v O>CDLO II)
V" N" ai cD r-: O~
~"=,,,",LC')~COO>
N t- "="'"'~
....
.,.
....
~
III
:I
:::
III
.,
oS
(.l
C
III
"i
In
'C
C
::I
IJ..
I/)
~
LIl CIlI/)
I- CIl in
~~"~ = ~
CIl CIl CIl 8 -I/) :::
Q.=en.E::l~
ec 0"'" 01>>
:c..Q)-m~a::
:l1ii>lllE.!!!iii
='-00)..... oW
Q)cve>I-CI)~o
~~.l!l1l~~1-
tl:Cl.Eu.E""
CDC')en
....0....
Nr--en
v"LO.=
NN
~
CIl
Q.
o
~
0. II)
'0 3
CIl ~
1ii :I
en 0
~ = ~
~ 0 Gl
5 l:: .::: :5
o E U) 0
en .! ~ ....m
~ I/) CIl
! c: <> 0
O...~et-
1-0.
6
0)
to-
/'-
""~
N
C"l~
....
N
C"l
N
v~
....
""~
....
CI:l
0)
CD
iii
N
....~
....
CI:l
CI:l
V
o
N
e">!.
....
in
Gl
!:!
::l
o
r/)
~
Gl
.::-
5
'Cl
c:
III
II)
Gl
:I
:::
CIl
>
-CIl
tl:
S
o
I-
~
N
.
....
""
N
LO....vOloen
vOOOlO""
vr--vO>Ol""
r-:ci~":...;=
v....OLOr--CI:l
V "t"""" "="'"' 'll:t N C"')..
....
....
to-
....
r-:
C"l
to-
N
MCI:lvCOr--Q
tD~C'?"t""""COCb
....r--MLOO> CD
" ci ..: ci ci ..;
or-~OCJ')T"""CD
-v........ V N C"l
....
to-
C"l
CD
=
""
""
N~
r--OOLOON
Mr--LO....Oto-
LOvr--MOQ
aiciLriN"LriN
ovLOCDCOII)
oc;t ('l")"="'"'''t""''"~
....
Q
o
0:>
to-~
Q
N
C"l~
COLOOr--NN
....ocor--r--It)
"t""""COM-..:tt-an
r-:ocDLricio
CD....COLOC')1t)
C').... LO C') "".
....
CD
:E
.!!!
'm
~
S
o
I-
I/)
1ii
"i:: rn
UJ'sB
CIl LIl "-
"S< ::E ~
e ~-g~
::s en III "0
....-UJQ)
'5~"!!!gj
c: 0 -.::
!.~~~
>C Q) ::::J ::)
wo.eno.
I/)
Q)
Cl
~
1l in
u l!!
-g .a
III :s
~ >. i
<> III Q.
.~ :i ~
CIl0
~]S
CIl .- 0
:5~t-
ou
:;
~ 0
II) f!!
::;:),&
~ I/)
CIl c:
.:: LIl
o .=
;!
-Q
iO
CI:l
N
C"l
....
Q
.
0:>
N
C"l
....
Q
.
0:>
N
en
Q
C"l
.
C"l
""
C"l
N
It)
..;
to-
CD~
....
""
N
to-
O
""
to-
.,.
C"l
Q
to-
r-:
""
CD~
....
CI:l
~
""~
en
0:>
Q~
....
.,.
It)
0:>
o
CD~
C"l
""~
....
N
It)
II)
..;
....
Q~
....
.,.
....
~
0:>
.
0:>
0:>.
....
en
C"l
en
N
N
C"l~
....
.,.
II)
Gl
II)
::;:)
~
Gl
.::
5
'Cl
c:
III
III
!
::l
..
:s
:::
Gl
Q.
0(
W
S
o
I-
....
C"l
~
CIl
..Cl
E
CIl
t.l
Gl
C
oS
(.l
c:
III
m
In
'Cl
C
:I
IJ..
@
o
o
Q)
CJ
C
C'CI
C'CI
m
"
c
::J
LL
C
U) .-
" U)
C Q)
::J C)
LL C
Q) C'CI
CJ"c
U) .- U
1.."'="
Q) C Q) C
>::JCI)C'CI
OLL
"Q)::QU)
C CJ Q) ~
<c .- C ::J
....'=_:!::
OQ)<c"
>. CI) C
~.... CI)
,.. .c - c.
.... Q) Q) ><
C C)w
" ~
::J U)
m Q)
,..... ::J
o C
o Q)
N ~
c:::
....
o
-
C
Q)
E
Q)
-
l!
CI)
o
o
I'-
10
u)
u)
C"t
....
'<;1"0
Cl>0
'<;1"_ 0_
("1')0
("1')0
CON
..... .....
~
CO
Cl>
'N
N
~
'I'-
..;
I'-
N
M
.....
'<;I"
N
~
~
10
N~
I'-
=~
....
1O'<;I"0Cl>0=
CO 100'<;1"10....
10 0 0..... CO '<;I"
....: ..0 0 r-: 10- al
("1')'<;1".....'<;1".....'<;1"
CO '<;I" f")
~~- M
~
~
~
10
N
I'-
=
....
1000COOf")
COOOIOON
1000Cl>01O
....: 00 cO IO-M
("I')NIO("I')Nu)
CO'<;l".....N U)
~~ M
~
U)
'<;I"
f")
'<;I"~
f")
~
.0
NO..... '<;1"..... =
.....Cl>Cl>N("I') '<;I"
..........OIOCOIO
oiooiooai
'<;I" CO '<;I" Cl>'<;I" =
10..... '<;I" N
~ T- M"
~
....
~
III
::l
C
III
.,
f
c
III
iii
ll:l
't:l
C
::l
u..
rn
0)
X
ro
I-
~11l
~"E
o 0)
III .... E
III a. 0)
:I - ....
c ro 0
t>> Q) ..::
> c: X
III 0) ro
tl:OI-
.!!l
c: 0)
EO) ro E Xl
'E 0 :::s
11l 0) 0 c
lfl E c: III
en c= ..... >
rn .... ::: .!!l
<(0)0)...
:m~.5iii
C)c>(/)..
0) ....0) 0) 0
Q.->I-
wEE
c:
f!!
.91
III ~
III ~
l::! I-
:I
o ~
en;:;
... ro
11 ~
- Q.
00
I'-
'<;I"
10
al
~
M
N
=
=
=
.0
~
o
M
=
N
=~
....
M
~
N~
'<;I"
M
~
o~
~
....
M
7
~
M
f")
..;
I'-
U)
.0
U)
o
f")
.0
..,.
..,.
U)~
....
10
f")
IO~
~
10
U)~
N
=
..,.
o~
=
'<;I"
U)-
III
Gl
t.l
...
:I
o
U)
...
GI
.c
..
o
't:l
=
III
III
Gl
:I
c:
GI
>
Gl
tl:
iii
-
o
I-
~
o
~
o
'<;I"
~
U)-
10
o
~
,..:
....
M
=
o
10
~
I'-~
U)
'<;I"
=
=
N
=
'<;I"~
....
'<;I"
N-
....
III
:is
.!!!
'iii
>
<C
IS
o
I-
OI'-COIO
01'-0=
OCONO
..0 r:ti 10' ai
1'-("1') ....
NCO ~
C'i"': ..;
OIOCO....
ONOf")
OCOOU)
'<;1"- C'i ..0 N
lOCO '<;I"
NCO ~
10..... u)
0.....'<;1"10
ONN'<;I"
O'<;l"Nu)
'<;1"' ..t ("1')- ..:
ION =
N 10 I'-~
10..... U)
O("l')CO~
OONN
OONN
I'-N("I')N
CO '<;1"..... '<;I"
'<;1"0 10
CON 0
....
III
l! ~
..a .~
:s 0)
cw
III _
Q..J:l
X 0)
WCl
III
III
. ...
:::s
:==
't:l
c:
III
Q.
X
w
t 7G
.c-
5~
ro_
Q. rn
.- 0)
t.l ....
-2 jg
a.E
...
:::s
o
rn
....
.91
rn
c:
~
III I-
CIl Cl
III c:
=>:.=;
;; ~
=~
00
..,.
o
I'-
=-
o
....
=
=
....
M
..,.
....
10
=
o
al
....
~
..;
..,.
N
=~
....
N
o
N-
~
10
f")
f")~
....
10
o
I'-~
o
I'-
10
U)-
U)
~
....
~
M
f")
=
..;
N
~
u)
I'-
....
....
f")
..,.
10
....
~
~
N
N
N
..,.
10
o~
....
~
~
10
N
I'-
=
....
~
III
III
III
;:)
...
III
.c
-
o
't:l
C
III
III
l!
:I
-
:s
c:
III
Q.
X
W
iii
-
o
I-
....
M
"-
CD
.Q
E
CD
u
CD
c
ai
u
c
.!!!
III
ll:l
't:l
C
::l
u..
@
o
o
ell
tJ
C
Cll
Cii
III
1Il"C
"CC
C ::::l
::::lLL.
LL.C
III ,-
- III
tJ ell
,ga, Cll
o C
1IlQ:~
"C_t)
~ C Cll
eIl::::l:!::"C
>LL.Q.C
o III Cll Cll
"C-t)1Il
_tJ_eIl
-eIl-~
<( '0' <( ::::l
.... '- I ~
o c.. '=' "C
~_ C
.- S ECll ~
t) .- ><
~Ew
t)::::l ~
mill
_ ell
ell ::::l
CllC
"C ell
::::l >
III ell
.....0:::
c....
c 0
N-
C
ell
E
S
S
tJ)
o
o
=
~
....
M
en
M
....
vONll'l
ll'lOO)V
,.....oo~
r...:OV.N-
ll'lNCOo)
~_~ 'V_It)
...... ......
tIl-
It>
N
M
N
It>
.=
aO
....
OCO
Oll'l
'0......
~cri
O)r-
MCO
OOOVCOOOll'l1l)
ll'l 00 CO CO 0 0..........
vOCOCOvNOCOv
criO~"":Miri"":MU;
MNOv Mr-ll'llt>
CO~N"'=t LOO) ~
~~- 10-
tIl-
It>
N
M
N~
It>
=
II)~
....
OOVO
ll'l000
vor-v
CO- 0 iri ai
MNMCO
co ...... CO_ r-.
...... ......
tIl-
o
v
Cl)
U;
to-
N
N
N
tIl-
~O)~t'--
Mvr-CO
COvCON
co" iri co" r...:
~NC>O
"""~cnLn
...... ......
....
~
1\1
:I
c:
1\1
~
r>>
t.l
c
1\1
iii
!Xl
'Cl
:::
:I
IJ..
<II
Q)
x <II <II
en 1: (1)
I- Q) Q Q)
~".E~"~E
Q) .:: ~ CIl Q) 8
g-ili 5l E~E
Cl)I....EC/)c:~=
~~~<t(pt/)Q)
-tllQ->CIlE
i(pt:'~&O)1i)
>C:>c~mcuQ)
Cl)Q)mQ.-=>
tl:C)I-CIlEuE
00)
ov
'oco
aicri
oco
NCO
NNMN
MVCO=
'Mr-O)N
irir...:ai"':
vO)oo
LOLOM=
...... Cl)~
ill
III
:l
<II <II c:
Q) :l ~
~ 0 Q)
tll ~ a::
t3.!!!,;
I....~o
Q) <II I-
:g~
to-
v
I....
..;-
o
v
v~
0000
0000
a:lLOOM
r...: co' 0 ..;
O)MOM
M co ll'l II)~
....
ll'l 00 II)
~oo~
or-oOoc.-
~ 0 0 v~
LOor-OtD
vo)ll'l=
N- M
,.,
o
'N
Ii
v
II)~
COOO=
cooo=
T"'"OO~
MOM.U;
vCOMM
VVN....
N ....... ..;
......0 v II)
COO co """
v 0...... Cl)
~ ci 'V- u)'
CO~O'>=
or-Nor-It)
v- ..;
<II
a;
<II
<II
<
~
"5. ill
'" CIl
U Q
- ...
o ::s
Q) 0
air/)
en f/) rJ) i
CIl ~ E :5
Q CIl 00
~.5~~_
o ~ ~ CI) .!
r/).l!!e..~~
Gi~"C~
; ~ is ~
Ol-me..
8
~
"""
=
,.,
en
11)'
o
M
II)
0'
M
o
en"
....
en
M
M
en
II)
en~
to-
N
en
u;
=
l't
....
....
ill
CIl
Q
...
:l
o
r/)
...
CIl
.c
o
'Cl
c:
1\I
II)
CIl
:l
c:
Gl
>
Gl
tl:
~
o
I-
to-
N
to-
ai
It>
=
ai
....
ONON
ocoo=
ONCO=
o as r-" aO
MN......to-
O)N....
MN-U;
It>
II)
=
N~
en
=
v.
N
VVCOCl)
0)0 co It>
covr-=
~MM"':
r-LONII)
......r-en
Mv-to-~
to-
....
to-
II)~
II)
"""
II)~
N
0a:l0=
OT"'"LOCC>>
Oo)ll'l",,"
M M-ll'l- N~
or-COT"'"CI)
r-MO
NV-to-.
to-
Cl)
II)
M
Cl)
It>
M~
M
--CX)cn=
COll'lMto-
MO) co en
r...:crio",,"~
VCOvlC
N......v=
NN-",,"~
...... ....
a;
:E
.!!!
";
>
<C
~
o
I-
<II
Q)
~
'"
.c ill
<II U E
Q) ~ ::s
Q c: ..
"~'" :s
CD Q.l en >. t:
E CIl "~ 411 !.
.3~~:lO(
'5 <II Q) 0 W
c: tll r/) -"iii
cp.r:: I.... s....
Q Q)'- 0
~5= ~i-
we..OU
v
v
0)'
~
o
N
N
o
......
r-'
ai
o
o
M
0)
M
N'
o
o
CO
N
N......
OCO
Mo)
r...:as
......N
0)
N
:;
o
~
.l!!
<II
i 1:
= ~ 5
:! ~.~
'- ; Cl
Cl) ~ "'C
.c OJ c:
o8"&l
""" It>
""" N
en =
"""~ r:>
o =
N M
N =
o It>
.... r-
to- II)~
en~ ....
o It>
o en
M~ o~
....
en to-
M 0
N to-
r:> N
o en
= =
N en~
M ....
It> """
N ~
U; ....
v 0
en =
N po.;'
....
ill
Gl
II)
:::l
...
Gl
.c
o
~
o
I-
....
Q
en,
=
=
""".
....
....
tIl-
o
=
~
....
,.,
en
,.,~
....
tIl-
o
....
o
M
It>
II)
IC~
....
tIl-
It>
N
M
N
Cl)
=
1/:>
....
tIl-
II)
Q)
<II
:::l
...
CIl
.c
o
'Cl
c:
'"
II)
E
::s
-
:s
c:
Q)
e-
x
w
~
o
I-
...
M
...
Gl
..Cl
=
Gl
~
Gl
o
r>>
t.l
c
.!!!
1\1
l:O
'Cl
:::
:I
IJ..
@
o
.... III
Ql"C
> =
o :::l
"Cu.
= Ql
:: .~ ~
o Q. C'Cl
~S~
() = :::l
Wen
o
13
Ql
III
~
-
Ql
Z
"C
III =
"C :::l
=u.
:::l =
U.
Ql III
III Ql
.- CSl
.... =
E-C'Cl
Ql~
C()
W"C
=
<c.C'Cl
III
e
:::l
::::
"C
=
Ql
Q.
><
'Q)W
CSl ~
"C III
:::l Ql
aJ ~
~ Ql
o >
o Ql
NO::
....
o
-
=
Ql
E
.!
J9
en
o
I:)
U>
I')~
....
N
I')
M
fA-
I')
~
=
M
N
Q
I')~
fA-
I')
"'"
=
1')-
N
Q
M
fA-
g,
=
I:)
g,~
I')
I:)
N"
fA-
....
~
l'lI
:I
C
l'lI
...,
i
ell
III
~
-
ell
Z
'Cl
.!
'-l
';:
-
III
E
c:
:::l
~"
II) .E
Gl
::::I ~ U;
i ~ ~
~ 1) 2
tl:U.!:
0)(000001:)
......(00000=
......""'OOOCOI')
"",' 0)' lei .0 .0 oj =
ID'<tN '<t =
(0 to-
M M
OOOOOOQ
OOOOOOQ
OOOOOIDI:)
.0 N .0 .0 ID" N' ..r
ID(oN '<t......Q
'<t U>
M M
COOOOOO=
OOOOOOQ
'<tooooo"'"
r--:- .0 ci ci N rei Q"
N'<t'<t....C'? U>
...... N
M M
~OtoO~coU)
CON......ID......I'-I')
CO(OC'?C">NCON
N 1'-" (0" ..: .,f '<to to--
C>"':::t""':::t"~'O:;t__1O
...... I')
C'? M
Ul
CD
C)
"1::
CD
r/)
Ul
CIl
:l
Ul :::
::l CIl
o >
CD Gl
Ul ::: tl:
_Ul,_~~-
r/) _ .!
.sd~ 1ii ~ 0
~~~~I-
II)
CIl
~ .E
::s
o f!!
r/),!
... Ul
Gl c::
.:: III
o ~
....
to-
U>
,.:
I:)
"'"
N
~
to-~
U>
....
~
N
"'"
,.:
U>
....
U>
I:)
Q
ui
"'"
=
1')"
~
N
g,"
....
to-
to-
M
N
I')
=
,.:
N
~
1')"
U>
I')
N
to-"
I:)
I')
M
in
Gl
~
:l
o
r/)
...
Gl
.::
o
'Cl
:::
III
II)
Gl
::s
:::
Gl
>
Gl
tl:
:s
o
I-
9
....
N
"'"
to-~
U>
....
,.:
COOO
IDON
......1D'<t
ci oj N"
IDID......
I'- N (0"
......
to-
U>
to-
.0
g,
to-
ui
C">g,
(01')
,(0....
.0":
'<tU>
I'- I')
M
C">1D'<tOON
I'-O)......ONQ
COC">(OOI'-"'"
"(-- cD ~ tn- ~- 0;
NN'<tI'-..........
I'-NID '<tg,
__- N
I:)
to-
U>"
....
I:)
"'"
U>-
C">O'<tOOto-
I'-OO)ON=
(0......001'-1:)
..: .0 N .0 rei Q"
NOOI'-'<t1:)
I'-N(o 1'-1')
__- M
I:)
N
=
l&>-
g,
=
10"
CO (0 0)
0)......0
CD.. No. --_
C'?No)
'<t......0)
(0 N C'?,
......
O)N
ID=
, (0 g,
r-:N
......to-
'<tl&>
N
Ul
CIl
~
III
Ul .r. II)
1ii U l!!
.~ "c: :::s
tn Q) c: .,
~mm :c
1I)"-:2:Ul>. :::
Gl2:"O~.!!lCDGl
...Q)I::.-_D~
:e~~~8'1::W
-g c:: .!!! en 1ii c?l :s
Q)Oc..~:=_O
Q..~c...t=c.J:tL-
)(a>::::I_ma>r-
WQ..r/)OUCl
Gl
:E
.!!!
'ji
~
:s
o
I-
"5
gJO
II) f!!
::l,!
... II)
Gl c::
.:: ~
Of-
I:)
N
l&>
0"
I:)
10
Q
Q
Q
.0
g,
~
Q
o
Q
.0
g,
"'"
o
Q
o
Q-
o
N
"'"
l&>
I')
=
....
g,
I')~
to-
10
Q
a;
~
1')"
fA-
N
Q
~
~"
to-
"'"
M
I:)
l&>
1')_
....
N
l"l
l"l"
tIl-
....
=
I:)
1:)"
"'"
=
1')"
=
=
Q
u:>-
o
l&>
N
tIl-
N
=
=
N
to-
=
N-
l"l
"'"
=>
l"l"
N
Q
I')~
tIl-
II)
CIl
Ul
::l
...
CIl
.::
o
'Cl
:::
III
II)
l!!
.a
:s
c:
Gl
Q.
0(
W
:s
o
I-
....
I')
...
ell
..Cl
E
ell
t.l
Gl
o
i
Gl
1Il
1Il
<C
-
ell
Z
'Cl
ell
-
t.l
';:
..
III
E
=:
:::l
@
o
o
fI)
"t:l
... I:
Cl) ::::I
>u.
o Cl)
"t:l (,)
c: -- -
<et:<(
_ Cl) I
o en t:'
~ "i C\:l
.- I: E
U'sE
I: ::::I
U)
o
J!l
Cl)
fI)
fI)
<e
.jJ
Cl)
Z
"t:l
Cl)
fl)t)
"t:l .-
1:'=
::::I fI)
U. Cl)
...
Cl) I:
.~ ~
t: I:
Cl) .-
en ~
0)
I:
C\:l
.c
U
"t:l
I:
C\:l
fI)
Cl)
...
::::I
:!::
"t:l
I:
Cl)
Q.
.jJ ><
Cl)W
0)
"t:l fI)
::::I Cl)
m ::::I
""'" I:
o Cl)
o >
N~
-
C\:l
I:
...
Cl)
.jJ
I:
-
o
.jJ
I:
Cl)
E
Cl)
.jJ
C\:l
.jJ
U)
,...
,...
=
It)~
I")
N
00 Q
,...0 ,...
,...10 ' N
.....- ..,f ui
0:> =
,... ,...
M-
I")
It)
....
N
,...
N
,...OC>CCI
.....OO:>Q
,...IOV""
c:OaDO>M
o N
,... ,...
M-
I")
It)
....
N~
,...
N
00 Q
00 Q
00 ' Q~
0..... ....
C> 0'1
CD CCI
M-
....
It)
N
Q~
,...
N
C"lIOO=
,...,........10
co V,... =
N' rD c>. =
0:> C"l N
CD ,...
M-
....
~
ClI
::
c
ClI
"")
Ih
-
CIl
III
III
<
-
CIl
Z
"Cl
S
~
'':
-
III
!
c
~
rn
~ III
"~ ~
Q) Q) C
enEma>
.... 0 :::lo >
o 0 a>
gj-c::~tl:
:l ..!ll
C Qi S
CIl t.l 0
> rIl I-
~ ~
III
Gl
f:! c::
:l
o f!:
Ul,l!!
Q;. rn
~ c::
;: ~
01-
Q
,...
N
CCI~
=
,...
CCI
Q
,...
M
N
,...
Q
Q
Q
....
0'1
CCI
=
10
=
=~
N
t--
III
Gl
t.l
....
:l
o
Ul
....
Gl
.c:
...
o
'Cl
c:
III
III
Gl
:l
c:
Gl
>
Gl
tl:
ji
..
o
I-
10
t--
0:1'
....
N~
N
Q
....
.....000:>0'1
vOLOO:>""
10 10 N v,...
NNc:O..,f"":
.....OC"lIOQ
C"lN N=
0'1
It)
=
It)
0'1
0'1
C>OOC"lN
NOIOO=
0:>,...,...,...0'1
..,f c:O rD C>- a>
C>0:>C"lC"l1O
N..... N,...
I")
10
....
I")~
CD
0'1
,...0
VO
010
coc>
0:>,...
N.....
0'1
Q
....
O'I~
0'1
0'1
VCD
vO
00
..,fc:O
CD 0
NN
Gl
:s
.!!
"ii
~
"ji
...
o
I-
III
a>
III
~
...
a>
.c rIl
5 Iii
"C: (/)
-grn.!!l~
III Q) III .-
IIl.02:2 1':
~~,,/E
=en ffi"
.... - r/) Q)
S ~ .!!! ~
;5l"5.{i
cz. l- Co. '-
>< Q) :::l :::l
WQ..CI)Q..
C"lQ
010
'vO'l
va>
C>IO
Nt--
co CD
010
'C>O'I
vui
10 N
N,...
rIl
Q)
Cl
....
III
.c III
() ~
" =
c:: ...
illS
rn C
Q) a>
o Q.
.~ 0(
Q) W
~S
Q) 0
.cI-
a
"5
l:l 0
III f!:
~,l!!
... rn
Gl c::
; ~
01-
0'1
,...
,...
....:
Q
=
=
CD
I")
..;
....
N
M-
N
=
0'1
a>
10
,...
,...
,...
=
IO~
I")
N
M-
Q
10
0'1
O'I~
10
,...
I")
Q
N
I")~
Q
N
M-
CD
10
0'1
ffi
N
t--
I")
10
....
N~
,...
N
M-
III
a>
III
~
...
a>
.c
...
o
"0
c:
III
III
~
:l
...
S
:::
Gl
Q.
><
W
S
o
I-
....
I")
...
CI>
.Q
E
CI>
~
CI>
C
III
-
CI>
III
III
<
-
CI>
Z
"Cl
S
~
'':
-
III
CI>
...
C
~
@Y
o
o
'Cl
:::
::l
IJ..
E
IE !
> Gl
O~
0:::
Z 0
<C III
LL. -;:
O[
~ E
_ 0
(.)(.)
CIl
:l
:::
Gl
>
Gl
a:
o
-
~~
... Cl
.ll N
.!
.. CD
.5 g
;; N
W
-
Gl CD
"'0
... 0
.ll N
ii II)
.3 0
" 0
< N
ii ...
.= =
" Cl
< N
Ci.f:'l')
.. 0
u 0
< N
c>>OOOOOOtO
r--~"'lttOOOc.-,N
;~~~"'~~~~
, .....O>oC;;c:>>COCO
~lOtt)CO ~
.;
.,.
COlOMoO'oea
~~~~f5ggg
c;;~:igf:i~g~~f
NCOlOCO '!"'"
.,;
.,.
COOMOOOOO
'lit It) C'\I It) 0 0 0' 0'
C'\!,.CD t"'-COIOO,,"", 0
~ ri ar)"N r: r.6 Nh 0
=coCOMCOr--COco
N. L'? to CO ~
.,;
.,.
COCOIl)l,.>")OIONO
_ML")COMCONO
~~~~dlq:o~~~
tnNIt)t"')CJ)CO .....
It)t'-coo> __
..
.,.
..... CD 0' V 0 0) CO 0'
NCOCJ)OllOOMO
N.CON.....VMOO
_a6!lie6o>eOO>O>
~""'COO)r-lOl."')o)
tt>COIOt-- "IN
..
.,.
CON coco co;:::-..... 0
MN_ co o "It 0
CO_MCOCO"lt_O
gL,?~-~~s:;g
NtOtOCO "1_
..
.,.
III
W
::l
Z
w
1:i
a::
..
Gl
..
e
Gl Gl
> =
Gl .. e
.!l a:: CO g
E S ~.!l ~
Cfl m C m ~ c>>
l'i! ... E III 0 E gj
~i~.e~~i!
~ I: ~ : i CO ~ .!
:'=~l2'Cl'I!8=
eB.!':!.!~ca
~::i.Eoir.Ec~
...
CII
>
o
't:l
C
~
...
o
~
()
't:l
C
:::l
LI.
E
CII
c
CII
~
..
""
'"
..
'"
'"
.0
.,.
<0
'"
'"
0>-
...
""
"""
.,.
.~
""
~
.0
0:>
'"'
"""
.,.
~
0>
o
..
~
'"
""-
.,.
""
""
0>
.;
0>
N
.-:
.,.
o
'"
"'
",.
<0
...
.;
.,.
rn
w
::l
Z
W
>
w
a::
..J
;!:
o
I-
c
o
IIJ
'i:
l'CI
Q.
E
o
()
CII
:::l
C
CII
>
CII
c::
t/)
'CIl
X
~
>.
t
CIl
Co
i:
c.
'"
CIl
::l
c:
CIl
>
CIl
a:
1ii
E
CIl
E
c:
~
CIl
>
o
Cl
~
CIl
E
~
S
t/)
CIl
Cl
~
to
.c:
U
III
C
g
:E
I'-
o
o
IN
a;
Cl
"tl
::l
CO
I~
1$
.",
I"~
Iii>
[UJ
,.
ILO
10
:~
i~
10
,<t:
ill
2l
oE
~
CIl
C.
o!S
t/)
CIl
t/)
c:
CIl
"
::i
en
CIl
"
o~
CIl
en
2l
~
o
u..
o!S
en
CIl
c:
u::
CIl
E
o
"
.E
ii>
~
CIl
:f
en
CIl
::l
c:
CIl
>
CIl
a:
()
en
:!E
t/)
~
~
t/)
c:
~
I-
11
@
o
"- '" '" 0 ~
'" ;0 <0 0 "-
~ '" .... 0 '"
CO "- N .,; as 0 .. 0
'" 0 ;0 '" "- '" '" 0
'to 0 <0 '" to ~ III
.. N N ,.; N <is
!II ..... c:
". ". .2
i
to 0> '" 0 0
<0 L()
co '" '" 0 0 '" M
0> co co 0 <0
OJ CD c>> c>> ,.; 0 ,.; .....
E 0 co '" 0 '" 0
;:I 0 N '" '" co
.. N N ,.; N "--
W
". ".
0
0
M
.....
~ '" N 0 '"
~ .... '" 0 C;;
0; '" ~ "'. 0
CD .; as ~ ,.; .; "C
'" 0 .... co N '" 0
"C 0 '" N '" '" ::
.. N N ,.; N .-: ::s r;::l
m 0
U. L() '01
'Cl ". ". N 10
::: l! ..... II
:l
IJ.. CIl
E N '" "- co 0 ::
"- 0 0 '" '" CIl
Gl co to- o .... ~
::: ii II) 0- ~ N c>> ....- ... C> 0
a: Ql .. 0 "- "- <0 ~ 0
w C!l c:; 0 0 0 N .... CIl N 1<0
<( N N ,.; N ....- >
> :: ..... I~
0 0
0 ::: .. ". "C 0
0 0 :: II) I~
z III <( .i: "~
<C ";: CIS
III
IJ.. Q. "' <0 '" '" .... c. 0 1-
0 = "- ~ <0 '" ~ 0 E ~ !C[j
~ 0 "- 0>" '" ~
>- 0 iii ~ as 0 .; .~ .,; ~ 0 ..... .
I-c.> .. ~ 0> '" '" '" co
c:; 0 0>. .... "'- to () L()
U Gl <( N N as () 0
... f 0
:l N
... .. ".
:s ::s '"
:::: 0 ::>
::: <=! tl
Ql "C ~ <(
Q. :: .....
)( <0 co '" '" co .
'" co co <0 <0 CIl
W <0 '" '" 0:> ....
iii .. .,; ~ 0 .,; .. c.
.= 0 ~ '" N '" co ><
" 0 <0 "'. <0 W
<( N N N .;
0
L()
.. ". 0
.....
III 0
0
w 0
III a:: -= ;:. '" ~ .....
W ::l -" CD
I- CD ~ ~ .c:
::l 5 E '" 0 0
~ $:
l- e Z c:: CI)
~
C co W CD .2 "2
E ... >
Z e >C 0 :0 :0
w - w Cl ::> ::>
... lI) ~ III ll. ll.
>C > ... ...J ~
W 0 .! C ;::
C!l .. i!: CD
! III 0 c::
.:! .:! - I- CD
co Cl
e :is :is ..
...
co .. .. 0
C!l ll. ll.
0
12
~
0 REVENUES EXPENDITURES
General Fund $ 8,534,974 General Fund $ 8,534,974
Special Revenue Funds 1,324,779 Special Revenue Funds 1,673,523
Debt Service Funds 5,674,339 Debt Service Funds 4,919,085
Capital Projects Funds 5,938,447 Capital Projects Funds 8,380,826
Enterprise Funds 3,846,056 Enterprise Funds 3,918,364
Intemal Service Funds 786,270 Internal Service Funds 807,779
Total $26,104,865 Total $ 28,234,551
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES_ NO
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF ANDOVER 2007 BUDGET AND 2007 PROPERTY TAX LEVY TO BE
CERTIFlED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR.
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of budgets is recognized as sound financial practice; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover receives significant financial support from its residents through the payment of
property taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover has the responsibility to appropriately and efficiently manage the public's funds; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Law requires the City to certify to the County Auditor an adopted tax levy and budget
prior to December 28, 2006; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Law requires the City to certify to the State of Minnesota Department ofRevemie an
adopted tax levy by December 28, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby adopts the 2007 City
of Andover Budget and the 2007 property tax levy totaling $9,316,427 as listed on Attachment A_
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby establishes the 2007 City of
Andover Budget by fund type as follows:
Adopted by the City of Andover this _day of December 2006_
CITY. OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Michael R. Gamache - Mayor
Victoria V olk - City Clerk
13
@
o STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
CITY OF ANDOVER )
o
o
1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Andover, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I
have carefully compared the attached Resolution No_ _ adopting the City of Andover 2007 Budget and 2007 Property Tax
Levy with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be true and correct transcript of the
whole thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscnbed my hand this _ day of December 2006.
Victoria V olk - City Clerk
14
ciJ
o
15
@)