HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC March 7, 1989
o
o
4:>
DATE: March 7, 1989
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
what's Happening
Cities Bulletin (2/17/89)
Park & Recreation Commission Minutes (2/16/89)
Planning & zoning Commission Minutes (2/14/89)
Memo to Rick Kronk (2/22/89)
Building Department Report (3/1/89)
Special City Council Meeting Minutes (2/21/89)
City Council Meeting Minutes (2/21/89)
Memo to City Council from Dave Almgren (3/7/89)
Letter from Linda Johnson (2/23/89)
1988 Coon Creek Watershed District Expenditures
Letter from John Davidson, TKDA (2/23/89)
Letter from Jerry Green & Tony Emmerich (3/7/89)
Letter from Nataiie Haas Steffen, Anoka County (3/3/89)
Citizen's Directory from League of Women's Voters
Letter from Peter Tritz, League of MN Cities (2/15/89)
NMA Notes (2/15/89)
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
DATE: March 7, 1989
o
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
What's Happening
Cities Bulletin (2/17/89)
Park & Recreation Commission Minutes (2/16/89)
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes (2/14/89)
Memo to Rick Kronk (2/22/89)
Building Department Report (3/1/89)
Special City Council Meetinq Minutes (2/21/89)
City Council Meeting Minutes (2/21/89)
Memo to city Council from Dave Almqren (3/7/89)
Letter from Linda Johnson (2/23/89)
1988 Coon Creek Watershed District Expenditures
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
o
o
p::; cc 3~
,.,...". _.__ , '. 7. ,~
R' EGEiliE.' I
League of Minnesota Citie. i ~;;--'-.lU.'
:4- I-LC 1 1989-1
Cities Bulle
Nf)OVER
Number 6
February 17, 1989
Year of the city proposal gets first hearing
The governor's proposal calling for $70
million in funding for community devel-
opment, housing, and edoca1ion programs
for the three first class cities of Duluth,
Minneapolis, and St. Paul had its first
hearing last Wednesday in lhe House
Economic Development Division on
Community Stabilization and Develop-
ment. This was the first in a series of
hearings on the governor's plan. Cities
interested in testifying on the proposal
should contact the League,
Thc division chair, Rep. Karen Clark
(DFL-Minncapolis), began the hearing
by announcing that the proposal has a
ncw namc, the "Ycar of thc Neighbor-
hoods." She explaincd that the new title
is more accurale and lhat some rural and
suburban legislators had reacted nega-
tively to thc original title. Clark spoke
about the rapid escalation in crime,
abandoned housing, arson, and unem-
ploymcnt rales in some areas ofMinnea-
polis which shc argucd have all had a
Rep. Karen Clark (DFL-Minneapolis), Sharon Vizenor(Commiltee Administrator),
Rep. Peter McLaughlin (DFL-Minneapolis and Rep. Clair Nelson (DFL-Barrelt)
listen public testimony on the Year of the City proposal at the February 14 hearing.
Photo by Laurie Fiori Hacking
destabilizing effcct on core neighbor-
hoods.
With the large hcaring room packed
with citizens from thc cenler' city
neighborhoods, several witnesses
dcscribed the situations in their
communitics and lhc need for the
legislation. Robert Benner of the
Minnesota Department of Trade and
Economic Development (DTED) spoke
on behalf oCthe governor. He chronicled
the state's efforts to finance rural
developmcnt and declared that "it is
now time to attack the corrosive effects
of urban decay and blight" Benner spoke
about the success with the Urban
Revitalization Action Program (URAP)
over the past two years and urged the
committee to build on that success.
Minneapolis City Councilmember Steve
Cramer spoke of the "schizophrenic
profile" of Minncapolis which has the
best--a strong and vital business and
retail sector--and the worst--high rates
of crime, poverty, unemployment, and
welfare dependency as well as rising
infant mortalily brought on by the in-
creased use of dmgs. Cramer also spoke
about the substandard and boarded-up
housing. He described thc situation as
See Year page 3
o Action Alert
There are no action alerts this week.
'. .'.~'l'l!!"'::<-". "
, .
,~ ;,1
. .,-,;, "
'..
I
Contents
Page
Articles
Year of the city proposal gets first hearing ..............1,3,4
.
Pay equity committee to begin meeting this month .......4
Zoning for group homes under consideration ....:...........4
League calls House tax increment repOlt biased ...........5
Federal Update
Bush budget puts cities' programs at risk ....................Fl
(inside back cover)
Bill Summaries ........................................................................S 1
(yellow sheets)
The Cities Bulletin is a
publication of the League of
Minnesota Cities and includes an
update of state legislative,
administrative, and
congressional actions that affect
cities. It also includes reviews
of metropolitan area issues by
the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities..
'\
o
League legislative staff members
are available to answer your
questions concerning legislation
relating to cities.
The Bulletin lists League and
AMM authors of articles and bilI
summaries by their initials.
Joel Jamnik --JJ
Laurie Fiori Hacking -- LFH
Stanley Peskar -- SP
Ann Higgins -- AH
Donald Slater -- DS
Sarah Hackett -- SH
Chuck Bichler -- CB
Thomas Grundhoefer -- TG
Debra Nyberg -- DN
Jean Mehle Goad -- JMG
Vern Peterson -- VP
Roger Peterson -- RP
,
~
o
page 2
LMC Cities Bulletin
._~~~~--r-._----.-.__._._----_._--_._-~-----_._--.
o
Year, continued from page 1
"overlapping social and physical prob-
lems which threaten Minneapolis' eco-
nomic engine."
Connie Levi, representing the Greater
Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce,
echoed Cramer's comments. Levi stated
that while businesses in Minneapolis
wanl property tax relief, they also under-
stand that the state mnst address the
underlying causes of rising property
taxes--lhe increased costs of services--
through efforts such as the governor's
proposal. Levi spoke about the flight of
businesses out of the center cities and
questioned "whether our cities arc going
to be the dumping grounds for the rest of
the state."
Representatives of SI. Paul and Duluth
also testified and presented statistics
reflecting the situations iu their iuner
cities. SI. Paul Mayor George Latimer
asked the Legislature not to view the
Year of the Neighborhood proposal as a
rural versus urban issue, stating, "We are
all in this together." He stressed that
,efforts to revitalize center city neighbor-
hoods must involve a partnership be-
tween the private sector and slate and
local govemments. He noted that the
federal government has virtually bailed
oul of lhis area. In order to succeed,
Latimer argued that programs must
address both the physical development
needs (adequate housing, removal of
blight) aud the human development needs
(employment training, day care, liter-
acy) of neighborhoods.
After the hearing, 50 legislators went on
tours of Minneapolis and SI. Paul center
city neighborhoods. House Speaker
Robert Vanasek (DFL-New Prague)
participated in the tour and, according to
newspaper accounts, appeared convinced
that the cities have serious problems,
"I'm convinced there is a need. Now it
has to compete with other well-estab-
lished needs."
o
According to the St. Paul Pioneer Press
Dispatch, other Greater Minnesota leg-
islators expressed similar sentiments.
"The housing stock in my district is in
similar condition, but it doesn't hit you
February 17, 1989
as hard because it's spread out instead of
all concentrated in one area," said Rep.
Rick Krueger (DFL-Staplcs). Rep. Henry
Kalis (DFL- Walters) commented that at
least in the center cities, houses retain
some value, "There's no value in the
run-down houses in my district. You
cau't sell them." Rep. Jim Tunheim (DFL-
Kennedy) said, "The biggest difference
is fear...People in our communities don't
have the crime problems that cause the
fear that we see here."
Summary year of the
city proposal
The governor's year of the city proposal
is in three different bills:
* H.F. 540 (Clark) aud S.P. 503 (Solon)
community resources program;
* H.F. 541 (O'Connor) and S.F. 502
(Berglin) targeted neighborhood revi-
talization and financiug program; and
* H.P. 466 (Vellenga) and S.P. 381 (D.
Peterson) eompctitive project grants to
school districts.
Community resources program
H.P. 540 and S.P. 503 establish a com-
munity resources program for first class
cities. Although the bill docsn't specify
a funding level, lhe governor has re-
quested $21.3 million for this program.
The three cities would share these funds
in proportion to their total population.
The state planning agency would have
review and approval authority overmak-
ing grants under lhe program and the
cities would need to keep such state
funds in a segregated fund. The objec-
tives of the program are to:
* provide counseling and related serv-
ices designed to slabilize families, to
improve school attendance, and to pro-
mote family health;
* provide housing, education, and em-
ployment opportunities that will lead to
greater self-sufficiency;
* reduce crime and fear of crime; and
* stabilize neighborhoods by supportiug
neighborhood-based orgauizations.
Under the bill, each city would desig-
nate target ueighborhoods for lhese pro-
grams. The target neighborhoods would
have to meet at least two of lhe follow-
ing conditions: it must have twice the
unemployment rate of the metropolitan
area, half the median income of the
metro area, or at least 25 percent of its
housing must be substandard or 70 per-
cent must be built before 1940.
In order to participale in the program,
the bill requires the lhree cities to draw
up a neighborhood program that includes
a detailed budget (including the amount
of private funding). The cities would
need to involve residents from the lar-
geted neighborhoods in setting up lhe
program aud organize a neighborhood
strategic planning gronps. The bill also
requires the city to establish a commu-
nity resource program advisory board to
include two members ofthe city conncil,
one county board member, one school
board member, and representatives of
targeted neighborhoods. The advisory
board would be responsible for dcvelop-
ing lhe cOllllllunity resources program
and would need to hold pnblic hearings.
Other affected govemmenlaluuits could
COfi1111Cnt on the proposal. The bill would
allow the city to use state funds in mak-
ing grants, loans, or entering into con-
tracts with non-profit organizations to
carry out the cOlllmunity service pro-
gram.
Targeted neighborhood
revitalization and financing
program
H.F. 541 and S.P. 502 establish a tar-
geted neighborhood revitalization pro-
gram for the three first class cities. The
program is similarto lhe Urban Revitali-
zation Action Program (URAP) ellacted
in 1987. The bill doesn't specify a fund-
ing level, however, the governor has
requested $40 million for this program.
pnge ~
mer school programs for junior high
students, and transportation services.
students from inner city schools who are
at risk of achieving at levels lower than
their potential," Activities that are eli-
gible for such grants include: early
intervention services for young children
at risk of failing school, preschool pro-
grams, services for minority students,
mentorship or tutorial programs, sum-
The lhree cities would share these funds
in proportion to their total population.
DTED would have review and approval
authority over disbursing funds for this
program.
c
The commissioner of education would
make decisions about grant awards in
consultation with a six-member advi-
sory committee. The bill would require
the commissioner to report to the legis-
lature on the program activities. LFH
Unlike the community resources pro-
gram, this revitalization program would
require city matching funds of 25 per-
cent of the state appropriation. Such
matching fnnds conld include tax incre-
ments. The objective of this program is
to provide housing and related services
primarily for low- and moderate-income
people living in targeted neighborhoods.
As with the community resourees pro-
gram, the target neighborhoods must
meet at least two of the following condi-
tions: have twice the unemployment rate
of the metropolitan area, half the median
income of the metro area, or at least 25
percent of its housing must be substan-
dard or 70 percent must be built before
1940.
Pay equity committee to begin
meeting this month
definition of equitable compensation
relationships to require all cities and
other locat units of govenmlent 10 dem-
onstrale that the average compensation
for female-dominated classes is equal to
lhe average compensation for male-
dominated classes except where there is
evident that any differences are due to
longevity, recruitment, relention, per-
formance, or other non-grader-rclated
factors.
The League has formed a special com-
mittee to review legislation affecting
local implementation of pay equily or
comparable worth plans.
The committee will have its first meet-
ing on Tuesday, February 28 at 9:30 a.m.
at the League office.
On the committee agenda will be a re-
view of legislative action pn S.P. 130
(Reichgott) a bill clarifying the ,lIIthor-
ity of the state human rights department
to use comparable worth plans in human
rights actions.
Housing activities under this program
would include construction, rehabilita-
tion, acquisilion of property, demoli-
tion, energy improvement loans, as well
as providing streets, sewers, utilities,
and community health and recreation
facilities.
Any interested city official may atlcnd
the commitlee meeting on Febmary 28.
If yon wonld like to be a member of the
commitlee please call Laurie Audetle at
the League office. JJ
Also on the agenda is review of S.F. 488
which, if enacted, would change the
In order to participate in the program,
the cities would have to prepare compre-
hensive revitalization and financing
programs. The proposal would require
cities 10 involve residents of targeted
neighborhood in development and im-
plementation of the revitalization pro-
gram. The city participating would need
to establish a nine-member advisory board
made up of two city councilmembers,
one county commissioner, two legisla-
tors, and fourresidents of targeted neigh-
borhoods. The advisory board would
need 10 hold public hearings.
Zoning for group homes
under consideration
(Pappas), would further limit lhe power
of ci1ies to regulate the location or op-
eration of these facilities.
Cities authority to regulate the location
of group homes is one of lhe land use
issues the 1989 Legislature is consider-
ing.
The Senale Human Services Commitlee
heard ScnalC File 235 (Lantry) on Wednes-
day, Febmary 15. Only one of the more
than 10 individuals scheduled to testify
had time to speak. The commitlee laid
over the bill until next week. The com-
mittee will probably hear it again next
Tuesday, February 21 at 1:00 -3:00p.m.
in Room 15 of the Capitol. City officials
interested in leslifying should contact
the League or the Association of Metro-
poli1an'Mnnicipalities. JJ
The term group home inclndes a wide
range of community residential facili-
ties homes housing the developmentally
disabled and individlials who wilhout
these facilities would likely end up in
correctional facilities.
Competitive project grants for
school districts
H.P. 466 and S.F. 381 create competitive
project grants of$8.7 million for school
districts in first class cities. To be eli-
gible, school districts must develop projCCl
plans aimed at meeting the "needs of
The current law provides a complicated
system where cities may require special
or conditional use permits for some larger
facilities. S.P. 235 (Lantry)/H.F. 222
,
o
February 17, 1989
page 4
o
'.~
o
League calls House tax increment report biased
In late January, the House Research
Department released a briefreport stat-
ing that tax increment financing "cost"
the state $53.5 million in 1988 through
the state intergovernmental aid system
(primarily school aid). The report argnes
that to the extent tax increment captures
property valne that would otherwise be
on the tax rolls, the state must make up
the difference through the school aid
formula.
Legislators discussed the report at a
hearing of the House Property Tax Sub-
conunittee. Some members of the
conunittee were left with the impression
that if tax increment were abolished the
state would have $53 million to spend on
other priorities. The League scnt a letter
to the House Tax Conunittee rebutting
the premise and findings oCthe report. A
reprint of that letter follows. LFH
The League of Minnesota Cities takes
exception to a recent House Research
report which asserts that tax increment
financing "costs" the stale money through
its intergovernmental aids system. This
report was discussed at last Tuesday's
hearing of the House Property Tax Sub-
committee. I believe the premise for the
report's analysis is incorrect. Rather
than an impartial examination of an is-
sue, the report advocates a particular
point of view.
The House Research analysis assumes
that all the property value added in tax
increment districts would have occurred
without tax increment assistance. It is
only with this blanket, across-the-board
assumption that one can state that tax
increTTu!nt "costs" the state funds through
its intergovernmental aids system. I
February 17, 1989
believe this is an extreme assumption
and produces a very one-sided analysis.
The League is preparing a number of
case studiesfor the Legislature's review.
Many of these studies demonstrate that
tax increment has added to the state's
property value because it was used to
keep manufacturing and industrialfirms
from leaving this state. Other case we
reviewed show how tax increment has
been used to encourage expansion of
firms in Minnesota--rather than outside
the state where a firm moy already have
manufacturing facilities. These are
examples which demonstrate that, with-
out cities' use of tax increment to retain
those firms, the state would have actu-
ally lost property value--Iet alone a sig-
nificant number of jobs, and state in-
come and sales tax revenue.
A more balanced and less biased analy-
sis of tax increment would also calculate
potential savings to the state occurring
when tax increment districts are decerti-
fied and their extra property value is
added to the tax rolls. One can argue
that the addition of this extra property
value reduces state costs through the
intergovernmental aid system. Yet the
House Research report totally ignores
this side of the equation. It ignores
offsetting savings even though the origi-
nal House Research Working Paper (#3)
on this subject states: "Tax increment
financing probably does increase the
total amount of development in the state
somewhat and this effect moy cause the
[cost] estimotes to be too high" (p. 2 of
"An Estimote of the State Intergovern-
mental Aid Costs of Tax Increment Fi-
nancing," April 1986).
The recent House Research report also
ignores the increased property value and
economic value of "spin-off develop-
ment" --that is, the additional develop-
ment spurred by the initial investment in
a tax increment district. For example, if
a firm elects to remain or expand in
Minnesota or if a city starts to revitalize
its downtown area through use of tax
increment, then the surrounding area as
well as the state will benefit from the
higher level of economic and develop-
ment activity caused by tax increment.
Purely economic arguments unfortunately
ignore how the use of tax increment can
improve the quality of life and livability
of cities by reversing decay and blight,
by mointaining a vital and healthy down-
town area, by facilitating the best and
most efficient use of land, and by making
the construction of low- and moderate-
income housing units financially pos-
sible in communities which lack such
housing. These are benefits which are
not easily measured by any mechanistic,
academic cost/benefit analysis.
This state, unlike some others, has no
large scale grant programs for develop-
ment/redevelopment. And the federal
government has virtually eliminated all
of its economic and community develop-
ment programs. That is why local ef-
forts--exercised most often through tax
increment financing--are so essential.
Without the tax increment tool, many
cities may decline and begin a cycle of
disinvestment that later will be hard to
reverse. The League urges you to main-
tain tax increment because it is the only
remaining development tool that can
help foster healthy, economically vital
cities. DS
page 5
o
',-
Courts and crime
Plea and charging guidelines for
county attorneys
H.F.427 (Pappas, Kelly, Vellenga,
Greenfield, Hasskamp) (Judiciary) would
require every county attorney, by Jauu-
ary I, 1990, to develop written guide-
lines regarding the charging and plea
negotiation policies that the county at-
torney and other prosecuting attorneys
within the county attorney's office would
follow for criminal cases. CB
Mandatory sentence for robbery of a
pharmacy
H.F.442 (Stanius, Omann, Marsh,
Bishop, Blatz) (Judiciary) would pro-
vide a mandatory minimum sentence for
aggravated robbery in a building or portion
, of a building that contains a phannacy or
other business that stores controlled
substances. CB
Theft, receiving stolen goods,
dishonored checks
S.P.383 (Spear, Pogemiller, D. Pe-
terson, McGowan, Marty) (Judiciary)
would expand the lheft statute to include
the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
The proposal would specify felony and
misdemeanor penalties for precious metal
dealers who receive stolen property. Theft
penalties would apply to the receiver of
stolen goods, and to individuals con-
victed ofissuing dishonored checks. The
bill would include false endorsement as
check forgery. CB
o
Controlled substance convictions,
penalties ,
S.P.385 (Pehler, Luther,Brandl,
David Frederickson, Beckman) (Judici-
ary) would increase incarceration and
monetary penalties for people convicted
of controlled substance offenses and
operating disorderly ho'!ses. CB
Bill Summaries
Bias-motivated crimes, penalties
S.F.412 (Berglin, Marty, Luther)
(Judiciary) would increase penalties for
certain crimes committed because of the
victim's race, color, sex, sexnal orienta-
tion, disability, or national origin. The
bill would increase penalties for prop-
erty damage, trespass, privacy intmsions,
harassing telephone calls, or mail har-
, assment, if motivated by bias. CB
DNA identification evidence
S.P.514 (McGowen, D. Peterson,
Ramstad) (Judiciary) would require the
bureau of criminal apprehension to de-
velop unifonn procedures for the collec-
tion and preservation of DNA identifica-
tion evidence, and to provide for the
admissibility of such evidence. The bill
would appropriale money for the devel-
opment of a DNA fingerprinting labora-
tory. CB
Economic development
Affordable housing programs, city
levy for publicly owned housing
H.F.535 (O'Connor) (Financial In-
stitutions & Housing) would appropriate
$9,875,000 to the housing finance agency
for low-income individual and family
rental housing, physical accessibility
modifications, and transitional housing.
The HFA would have authority to make
loans for neighborhood preservation and.
home equity conversion by the elderly.
The bill would create a housing
court division in the second and fourth
judicial districts (Hennepin and Ramsey
counties). The tax capacity of one to
three unit rental housing (a portion of
Class 4b) would decrease to 2.5 percent
(currently 3.5 percent). The bill would
expand qualification for preferential
government-financed housing. Cities
would have the authority to special levy
up to one mill (not subject to levy limits)
for the development, improvement, and
operation of publicly owned housing.
SH
Elections and ethics
Interpreter services, handicapped
accessibility at caucuses
H.P. 354 (Jefferson, Trimble, Lynch)
(General Legislation, Veterans Affairs
& Gaming) would require major politi-
cal parties to provide inlerpreter serv-
ices at precinct caucuses and at county,
legislative, and congressional district
conventions upon request from individu-
als who arc hearing impaired. In addi-
tion, the bill wonld require that precinct
caucuses be held in in handicapped ac-
cessible locations. If no handicapped
accessible facilities are available within
the precinct, the party could hold the
precinct caucus at a site outside the
precinct. AH
12-year-olds to vote
H.P. 356 (Kahn) (General Legisla-
tion, Veterans Affairs & Gaming) would
propose an amendment to the Minnesota
Constitution to permit every 12-year-
old resident to vote. The proposed amend-
ment would be placed on the 1990 gen-
eral election ballot for approval. AH
Fundraising during legislative
sessions
H.P.402 (Miller, Scheid, Gutknecht,
Weaver, Macklin) (General Legislation,
Veterans Affairs, & Gaming) would
prohibit state senators and representa-
tive from accepting funds from lobbyists
or political funds while the Legislature
is in either general and speeiallegisla-
tive sessions. This bill would not pro-
hibit fundraising for party caucuses or
special elections. Violation would be a
gross misdemeanor. SH
Campaign funds transfers and
legislative session fund raisers
H.P. 471 (Sviggulll, Frcderick,
Waltman) (General Legislation, Veler-
ans Affairs & Gaming) would prohibit
the transfer of campaign funds from one
candidate to another and fundraisers for
February 17, 1989
SI
individual legislators during the regular
legislative session. The bill would also
restrict political party and legislative
caucus fundraiscrs to no more than two
events during the regular session of the
Legislature. Provisions ofthe bill would
forbid candidates from approving or au-
thorizing campaign committee or politi-
cal fund other than the candidate's prin-
cipal campaign committee. AH
Special election campaign funds
S.F. 368 (Luther) (Elections & Eth-
ics) would provide a state subsidy for
legislative candidates in special elec-
tions by establishing a separate special
eleclion account in the state eleclion
campaign fund. If a candidate refused
general funds during regular general
legislative election campaigns those funds
would go to the special election account.
AH
Distribution of campaign literature
S.F. 428 (Berglin, Luther, Hughes,
Laidig, Kroening) (Elections & Ethics)
would authorize individuals to distrib-
nte campaign material within multi-unit
residences including apartments, donui-
tories, nursing homes, and mobile home
parks if lhe person is a resident of that
building or property. The bill woold restrict
admittancc to specific apartments or other
personal residential units. It would pro-
vide restrictions based on health con-
cerns in nursing homes; and limit hours
and length of time for distribution of
campaign literature within the facility.
AH
Public financing of candidate forums
S.F. 436 (Dennis Frederickson, R.
Moe, Benson, Hughes, Samuelson)
(Elections & Ethics) would require an-
nual funding of candidate fomms for
statewide, legislative, and congressional
candidates. The proposal would alter
the distribution of public financing to
fund legislative and congressional can-
didate debate forums. Further, the bill
would rcquire that five percent of funds
going to major statewide political par-
ties be available to the secretary of state
for congressional candidate debates.
Legislative candidates would need to
participate in two state-sponsored de-
bales in order to be eligible for public
82
financing. The bill would limit forums
to legislative candidates of major politi-
cal parties in the general election. AH
Secretary of state's housekeeping
bill
S.F. 553 (Donna Peterson) (Elec-
tions & Ethics) would authorize the
secretary of state to provide public infor-
mation, promote attendance, and make
precinct caucus results available to the
public in a timely manner. The bill
would clarify that election laws apply to
voting by absentee ballot and specify
that the secretary of state may take part
in non-partisan programs to promote v01er
registralion and participation. The bill
would authorize the secretary of state to
inspect ballots for county, municipal,
and school district elections; and would
extend mailed ballot elections for school
districts for ballol questions. h)arification
oflimits on polling place activity would
eliminate previous restrictions on post-
election exit surveys that were overruled
in 1988 court action and limit persons
congregating in munbers within 100 fect
of the polling place.
Candidates withdrawing from spe-
cial primary elections would need to do
so no later than 5:00 p.m. on thc day after
the last day for filing. A new provision
would require municipal clerks to pro-
vide written nolice of clection to the
county auditor at leasl 30 days prior to
every municipal election. The same
requircment would be effective for ev-
ery school district. The bill would re-
quire voting machine vcndors to post a
performance bond with the secretary of
state in accordance with any contract or
agreement with local election jurisdic.-
tions. The bill would alter deadlines for
campaign finance reports from local
candidates reports now duc seven days
prior to special primaries and special
elections to 10 days prior to those samc
elections. AH
Environment
Road vacation, notice to DNR
H.F.400 (Wagenius, A. Johnson, R.
Johnson) (Environment & Natural Re-
sources) would require written notice to
the commissioner of natural resources
whencvcr a public entity vacates roads,
highways, streets, alleys, or similar public
grounds which abut public water. CB
o
Clean indoor air act amendments
H.F.452 (Kahn, Ogrcn. Dille,
Skoglund, Hasskamp) (Health & Hu-
man Services) would define common
areas of apartments and eondominiluns,
factories, warehouses, and similar places
of work as public places for the purposes
of the act. The 3Irendrrents woold remove
the exception wbich allowed patients in
chemical dependency treatment to smoke
in health care facilities. The proposal
, would expand employer responsibility
to protect non-smokers from smoke and
would prohibit disciplining employees
who complain about smoke. CB
Constitutional amendment, lottery
revenue to the environment trust
fund
H.F.479 (Munger, V. Johnson,
Redalen, G. Anderson, McGuirc) (En vi-
rOlunent & Nalural ResOl!rces) would
propose an anlendmcnt to the Minncsota
Constitutiou that would dedicate certain
lottery revcnue to lhe environment and
natural resources trust fund. CB
Groundwater protection, abaudoned
well sealing projects
H.F.490 (Uphus, Girard, Hugoson,
McPherson, Dille) (Environment &
Natural Resources) would provide ap-
propriations to the board of water and
soil resources for cost-sharing contracts
for dcmonstration abandoned well scal-
ing projects in 15 counties, and to the
dcpartment of hcalth for proper sealing
of abandoned wclls. The bill would
require thc board to conduct astatewidc
geological asscssment of potcntial for
groundwater pollulion from abandoncd
wells. The proposal specifies financial
assistance eligibility, proccdures and
criteria for ranking projccts. CB
Degradable waste containers
H.F.590 (Cooper, C. Nelson, Brown, Morrison, Munger) (Agriculture) would
require that disposable bags thaI people
usc primarily for yanl waste be degradable,
contain at least six perccnt starch, and
not have ccrtain heavy mctals in their
LMC Cities Bulletin
~
o
o
dyes or pigments. The bill would apply
to sales after March 31, 1990 and to any
nse after March 31, 1991. CD
'--
Petroleum wnk cleanup act
H.F.610(Sparby, Munger, Vanasek,
D. Carlson) (Environment & Natural
Resources) would authorize the polIu-
tion control agency to assist people in
reviewing real property for petroleum
tank releases and to receive pay for such
assistance. The bill would authorize
expenditures from the petroleum tank
release compensation fund for adminis-
trative costs. The bill would require notice
of above ground tanks by June 1,1990.
CD
Solid wa~te programs
S.F.371 (Merriam, R. Moe, Les-
sard, Marty, Laidig) (Environment &
Natnral Resources) would require the
department of administration, in coop-
eration with the commissioner of the
polIution control agency to develop a
model waste reduction procurement
program by January I, 1992. The com-
missioners of administration and public
safety would have to review the barriers
lhat limit recycling systems in build-
ings, and to report the findings by No-
vember I, 1991 to the legislative com-
mission on waste management.
The bill would reqnire the commis-
sioner of administration to develop and
implement a cooperative purchasing
program (to inclnde state agencies,local
govemmental units, other state govem-
ments where feasible, and the federal
govemment), for the purpose of pur-
chasing recyclable malerials. The agency
would also need to develop and coordi-
nate solid waste programs including public
education, promotion of waste reduc-
tion, and technical and financial assis-
tance to solid waste generators.
o
The bill .specifies the goal of every
county recycling a minimnm of 25 per-
cent by weight of its annual total solid
waste generation by July 1,1993. Under
this proposal, the county would have the
authority to require political subdivi-
sions within the county to develop and
implement programs to meet the recy-
'-
l?ebruary 17,1989
cling goal. The administration agency
and the metropolitan council would have
authority to monitor the progress of each
county, and possibly recommend legis-
lation to establish mandatory recycling
standards for counties failing to meet the
recycling goal.
The bill would require that after
July 1, 1994, lhe pesticide products be
sold in returnable containers, and would
require the labeling of designated prob-
lem materials. The bill would prohibit
the placing of white goods with munici-
pal solid waste after January I, 1990.
and would require studies of particular
waste ilems. The bill would impose civil
penalties for littering. Under the pro-
posal, solid waste colIection and dis-
posal services would be included in the
sales tax. CD
Solid waste districts, modifications,
S.F.386 (Pehler, Merriam, Davis,
McQuaid, Lessard) (Environment &
Natural Resources) would require source
separation of recyclable materials by
geuerators of mixed mlUlicipal solid waste,
and would impose a surcharge on sites
that do not separate recyclable materi-
als. Under the proposal, grants would be
available for recycling program implem-
entation and market development. The
bill would authorize solid waste man-
agement districts to prepare budgets and
levy after county approval, and would
require joint powers agreements before
fomling solid waste management dis-
tricts. CD
Groundwater protection act
S.FA1I (Morse) (Environment &
Natural Resources) would establish
management practiccs to prevent polIu-
tion of water recources. The bill would
require the department of agriculture to
adopt water resoUlces protection require-
ments and identify and develop manage-
ment practices for the distribution, stor-
age, and use of pesticides and fertilizers.
The bill would create a duty to prevent
groundwaler pollution, and would au-
thorize the department of health to adopt
ndes specifying procedures and criteria
for establishing a list of recommended
alIowable drinking water polIution lim-
its. The pollution control agency would
have authority to adopt rules cstablish-
ing numerical groundwater polIution
limits, and prepare, in cooperation with
the department of agriculture and the
board of water and soil resources, a
report on inorganic nitrogcn compounds
in groundwater.
The bill would provide special pro-
tective measures for sensitive ground-
waler areas. It would also modify the
regulation of fertilizers. The bill would
create a task force to develop recom-
mendations for a nitrogen fertilizer
management plan and would mandate
licensing of commercial fertilizer retail-
ers and custom applicators. The biII wonld
restrict filling and cleaning of applicator
equipment and require a permit 10 apply
fertilizers through an irrigation system.
The commissioner would have power to
enter sites where people manufacture or
selI fertilizer to inspect the equipment
and storage, and sample the fertilizer.
The legislation would adopt federal stan-
dards for fertilizer, soil amendment, and
plant amendment if they arc consistent
with state law. The bill would impose
civil and criminal liabilities for viola-
tions.
The bill would also modify pesti-
cide control The bill would make the
state responsible to promote and facili-
tate the use of integrated pest manage-
ment through education, financial assis-
tance, infomlation, and research. The
bill would create an edncational pro-
gram for pesticide applicators and the
pesticide applicator education and ex-
amination review board. The proposal
would require licensing of retailer han-
dlers and collection of waste pesticides.
TIle proposal would impose an allllllal
fee of $3.20 on service connections to
public water supplies with proceeds going
to the state general fund. The bill would
modify waterwell regulations and would
extend regulations to elevator shafts and
hydraulic cylinders. It would require
water welI contractors to be licensed,
and specifies slandards for closing wells
and exploratory drilling. The proposed
legislation would create a water resources
83
infonnation amI education committee. a
water research coordination committee.
and a 12-member legislative commis-
sion on water. CB
Solid waste disposal, on-site
dumping/open burning
S.F.424 (Benson, Bernhagen, Meluk-
ens, Dean Johnson) (Environment &
Natural Resources) would allow land-
owners to dispose of a single family's or
household's solid waste on-site without
a pennit, provided that it occurs in a
nuisance-free, pollution-free. and aes-
thetic manner. The bill would exclude
the disposal of non-biodegradable plas-
tics and pesticide containers, and would
require groundwater survey of the ef-
fects. Non-metro cities could allow open
burning of paper. cardboard, and vegeta-
tive matter. CB
Solid waste disposal, on-site
dumping
S.F.427 (Larson, Anderson. Ren-
neke) (Environment & Natura1 Resources)
would allow landowners to dispose of a
single family's or household's solid waste
on-site without a pennit, provided that it
is done in a nuisance-free, pollution-
free, and aesthetic manner. The bill
would exclude the disposal of non-bio-
degradable plastics and pestici~e con-
tainers, and would require a groundwa-
ter survey of the effects. CB
Solid waste disposal, weight-based
fees
S.F.460 (Dahl) (Environment &
Natural Resources) would require facili-
ties that receive more than 75,000 cubic
yards of solid waste annually to be
equipped with scales. The bill would
require the recording of the loaded and
unloaded vehicle weight, and would
require that the fee be based on weight.
A disposal facility would have to accept
solid waste without regard to the vol-
nme, inclnding ears and pickup trucks.
CB
Wastewater treatment, set asides
and grants
S.F.470 (DeCrarner. Vickennan.
Benson, R. Mae) (Environment & Natu-
84
nil Resources) would require municipal
wastewater treatment facilities to set aside
a minimum of five cents per 1,000 gal-
lons of wastewater flow to be deposited
in a dedicated capital improvements or
facility replacement fund. The proposal
would reduce allowable independent
granls by a percent of constrnction cost,
and would set a dollar limit on the grant.
CB
Solid waste management
S.F.530 (Merriam, Dahl, Davis)
(Environment & Nalnral Resources)
would extend the expiration date of the
solid waste management advisory coun-
cil and the hazardous waste manage-
ment planning conncil to June 30, 1994.
The bill wonld modify designation plan
reqnirements and procednres, and spec-
ify financial and bookkeeping reqnire-
ments for solid waste disposal facilities.
The proposal would require lhe pollu-
tion control agency to submit a biennial
report to the Legislatnre' on the eco-
nomic statns of the solid waste manage-
ment industry. Political subdivision lia-
bility for snperfund cleanup at landfills
would be a maximum of $400,000 per
facility, unless operated under a joint
powers agreement.
The bill would allow the PCA to
acquire property for sUJlCrfnnd purposes.
The definition of harnlful substances
would follow federal law and would
inclnde petrolenm and hazardons wastes.
The bill would limit the period to submit
property damage claims. and expand
allowable damages to cover inability to
sell property. The proposal wonld modify
the metropolitan council solid waste plan
requiring 20-year objeclives inland dis-
posal abatement plans and waste dis-
posal facilities development schedules.
The bill wonld increase the fee on metro
area mixed mnnicipal waste to $2.00
(now 50 cents) percnbic yard. and would
allocale proceeds. Other changes wonld
Iimillandfilling of metro area solid wastes
and modify the met council's regulation
of connty solid waste plans and implem-
entation. CB
Finance and revenue
Local government special levies
H.F.550 (Stauius) (Taxes) would
specify that special levies are only the
portion of taxes levied for specific pur-
poses. and specifies that financing of
infrastrncturereplacement reserve funds
is a special levy within the levy statule
(relating to special levies assessed in
1989 and payable in 1990). SH
o
Unfunded mandate costs, local
option to COml)ly without funding
H.F.369 (Sviggum. Dauner. BeJtram,
Girard, Miller) (Local Government &
Metropolitan Affairs) would give polili-
cal snbdivisions the option not to com-
ply with state slatutes or executive or-
ders if the Legislature has not made a
timely appropriation to cover the costs.
Political snbdivisions abiding by such
laws would have the right to levy for the
cosls of complying, wilhont regard to
levy limits after notifying the secretary
of state and the commissioner of fi-
nance. Effective for mandates enacted
or issued after June 30. 1989. SH
Certain school certificates of
indebtedness without election
H.F.418 (K. Nelson, McEachern)
(Education) would remove the require-
ment for electorate approval of certifi-
cates of indebtedness issned for certain
eqnipment (compnters, cable equipment,
photocopy and office equipment. ve-
hicles other than school buses, and oth-
ers). These certificales would need only
a board resolution for approval. SH
Gambling
Budget reserve, charitable gambling
S.F.473 (Doug Johnson) (Taxes &
Tax Law) would change the budget re-
serve allocation from $550. million to
five percent of all forecasted non-dedi-
cated general fund receipts for the bien-
nium. The bill wonld exclude the chari-
table, gambling tax from gross profits
and specify that gross receipts docs not
include proceeds from rental of a li-
censed bingo hall. The bill would change
o
LMC Cities Bulletin
o
the tax on lawful gambling to six percent
(now 10 percent) of gross receipts, with-
out an offset for prizes paid out. CB
\-
Charitable gambling, use of profits
to maintain buildings
H.F.419 (Kalis) (General Legisla-
tion, Veterans Affairs & Gaming) would
allow charitable gambling organizations
to use profits from charitable gambling
to maintain and repair buildings they
own or lease. The bill would be effec-
tive the day following final enactment.
CB
Charitable gambling, transfer tax
authority to revenue standards
S.F.506 (purfeerst, Lantry, Dean
Johnson, Spear, Vickerman) (General
Legislation & Public Gaming) would
give the commissioner of revenue lhe
power to collect and deposit charitable
gambling license fees, taxes, fines, and
penalties and to receive and inspect records
and reports. The bill would transfer
financial and tax registration duties of
the charitable gambling board to the
department of revenue, and expand cer-
tain reporting requirements. The pro-
posal would require licensure of manu-
facturers of gambling equipment, and
would set standards for storage of gam-
bling equipment. The bill would exempt
rulemaking from administrative proce-
dures act requirements, and establish
penalties for non-licensed sellers. CB
Generalgovernnnent
Drivers' license, non-renewal due to
bad checks
H.F.389 (Schreiber, Scheid, Milbert,
Seaberg, Dempsey) (Transportation)
would provide that a person must dis-
charge bad checks before the state will
issue, renew or reinstate a driver's li-
cense. Under the bill, the department of
public safety would maintain records of
bad checks. Effective January I, 1990.
CB
o
Gender balance requirement on state
and metropolitan commissions. S.F.406
(Donna Peterson, Piper, Pogemiller)
(Governmental Operations) would re-
quire that membership on multimember
February 17, 1989
state boards, commissions, councils, and
metropolitan agencies be gender bal-
anced, but would not require displace-
ment of incumbent members until expi-
ration of their term. ElTective July 1,
1989. SH
Urban drought relief
H.F.433 (Simoneau, Weaver. A.
Johnson, Segal, Morrison) (Agriculture)
would provide urban drought relief by
establishing a program of low-interest
loans for repairs to drought damaged
homes. The proposal would provide
assistance to certain municipalities with
water supply problems. Eligible mu-
nicipalities would include those with a
population under 50,000 that rely on a
single well or surface water source for
50 percent of their annual water supply.
The board of water and soil resources
would receive an appropriation and have
power to conduct investigations to de-
tcrmine eligible mnnicipalities. CB
Grants for private, non-profit
hospitals
H.F.529 (Battaglia, Ogren, Tunheim,
Winter, R. Anderson) (Local Govern-
ment & Metropolitan A1Tairs) would allow
cities and town,s to make grants for the
use of a private, non-profit hospital that
serves the city or town. CB
Building code, relocation of
residential buildings
H.F.595 (O'C onnor, Bcnnett, Pel-
low, Osthoff. Krueger) (Financial Insti-
tutions & Housing) would exempt relo-
cated residential buildings from the state
building code requirement that they meet
new building specifications, provided
that all unsafe conditions have been
corrected and the building complies with
local zoning ordinances. CB
Group homes siting
H.F.605 (Stanius, Simoneau,
Schreiber, Clark) (Health & Hnman
Services) would reduce the size of per-
mitted programs as single-family resi-
dential to five (now six) or fewer per-
sons, and would allow local zoning au-
thority to require a conditional or special
use permit to ensure proper operation.
CB
Dangerous dogs regulations
SF.382 (Betg, Lantry, Delmis Freder-
ickson, McQuaid, Davis) (General Leg-
islation & Public Gaming) would pro-
hibit local ordinances that define spe-
cific breeds of dogs as dangerous. The
proposal would require standardized,
identifiable tags on registered danger-
ous dogs. The bill would specify when
animal control authorities would be able
to seize a dangerous dog, would allow
the owner to reclaim the dog, and would
require seizure on second charge after
conviction of the same dog. The bill
would increase penalties and would
specify what constitutes a proper enclo-
sure. CB
Malt liquor sampling
S.F.413 (Spear) (Commerce) would
allow off-sale licensees and municipal
liquor stores to provide samples of malt
liquor (less than 100 milliliters) at no
charge on the licensed premises. CB
Historical purposes appropriations
S.F.417 (Metzen) (Local & Urban
Government) would remove the $2,000
a year appropriation limit for collecting,
preserving, storing, publishing, or dis-
playing historical data or commemorat-
ing historical events. CB
Liquor license qualifications
S.F.420 (Ramstad, Spear) (Com-
merce) would prohibit issuance of a re-
tail liquor license to a person who has
not demonstrated competency in the
knowledge, operations, management, and
training of staff in responsible beverage
service. CB
Human rights, expanded Ilrotection
S.F.446 (Reichgott, Pehler, Spear)
(Judiciary) would modify the definition
of disability and expand family status
protection to pregnant woman and people
in the process of securing legal custody
of a minor. The bill would allow an
employer to require psycohological or
personality examinations for the pur-
pose of determining the person's capa-
bility to perform available employment.
The proposal would limit age-re-
lated questions in employment applica-
tions, and place the burden of proof on
Sr.'
,)
the employer to show how perceived or
real impairments would prevent job
completion or essential job functions.
The bill would provide that other job
opportunities are not a defense, and would
require employers to disclose all medi-
cal information which they have about
particular applicants.
Under this bill, discrimination would
include the failure to make appropriate
accommodations in rental housing. The
proposal would expand credit discrimi~
nation to cover all protected classes.
The bill would allow the department of
hwnan rights to serve supoenas person-
ally or by certified mail, and would give
the, commissioner discretion to make
investigative data in closed files public.
It would apply affirmative action
requirements on state contractors to all
employers with 200 or more employees,
wherever situated. CB
Towns, water and sewer powers
S.F.459 (Adkins, Schmitz, Renneke,
Vickerman, Bernhagen) (Local & Ur-
ban Government) would grant towns
authority to establish storm sewer im-
provement districts. CB '
Open meeting law, application to the
Legislature
S.F.501 (Benson, Merriam) (Rules
& Administration) would impose the
open meeting law on the Legislature,
including floor sessions, meetings of
slanding committees, special commit-
tees, divisions, subcommittees, confer-
ence committees, and commissions. CB
Public works, unlicensed contractors
S.F.507 (David Frederickson, Beck-
man, DeCramer, Davis) (Commerce)
would allow unlicensed individuals to
perform services on public works or
improvemenls where the cost does nol
exceed $100,000, provided that plans or
specifications for water supply or waste
management work or improvements
receive approval from the appropriate
state agency. Effective: retroactive to
August I, 1987. CB
Reorganization charitable gambling
board and waste management board
S.F.545 (D. Moe) (Governmental
Operations) would transfer charitable
gambling tax authority to the depart-
ment of revenue, and would eliminate
the waste management board. CB
Metropolitan
Metropolitan council to prepare
water use and supply plans
H.F.516 (Solberg, Kinkel) (Local
Government & Metropolitan Affairs)
would require the metropolitan council
to prepare water use and supply plans.
The short-term plan would need to be
completed by July 1, 1989, and the long-
term plan by July 1, 1990. CB
Pensions and retirement
Survivor annuities for surviving
spouse
H.F.425 (Simoneau). (Governmen-
tal Operations) would allow the surviv-
ing spouse of a Teachers retiremenl as-
sociation member who was at least 55 at
'death and who had 19 years of service
credit in TRA plus at least one year of
employment at the University ofMinne-
sota, to collect the second portion of a
100 percent joint and survivor annuity.
The bill would apply retroactively to
1977. CB
Excess police state aid
H.F.557 (Rediug) (Governmental
Operations) is a League supported bill
which would permit city use of excess
(amount grealer than needed to pay
employer PERA cost) police aid to pay
for employee and retiree health insur-
ance costs. Because police aid is pro-
, vided by a tax on automobile insurance
and has been growing faster than police
salaries, more and more cities have been
sending larger anxlUnts of money to PERA
with no credit to the city or officer.
Speak to your legislator in support of the
Reding bill. CB
Rule of 90 for teachers retirement
H.F.565 (Omann, Wenzel, Mack-
lin, Haukoos, Dempsey) (Governmental
Operations) wonld permit teacher retire-
ment association members to retire when
their age plus allowable service credit
totals. 90 years, without reduction for
early retirement. CB
o
Andover: Volunteer firefighters
H.F.587 (Lynch, Simoneau, Weaver)
(Governmental Operations) would ex-
clude Andover volunteer firefighters from
the definilion of public employee for
retirement coverage. The bill would
exempt volunteer firefighlers from fu-
ture contributions to PERA and would
allow a refund for past conlributions.
CB
Public pension plan fiduciary
responsibility and liability act
S.F.397 (D. Moe, Pogemiller, Morse,
Renneke) (Governmental Operations)
would set standards for determining who
is and who is not a fiduciary with respect
to public pension plans, and would set
general standards of fiduciary conduct.
The bill would require economic inter-
est statemcuts from governing board
members and chief adminislrative offi-
cers. The proposal would limit author-
ized investments for plans with assets
under $1 million.
The bill would specify minimum
liquidity requiremenls for small plans,
specify prohibited transactions, require
summaries of benefit provisions 10 go to
participants and recipients, and specify
fiduciary liability and damages, gener-
ally prohibiting indemnifiealion offidu-
ciaries. The bill would allow challenges
to fiduciary actions, and require con-
tinuing education programs forfiduciar-
ies. CB
Personnel
PELRA, essential employees &
procedures
H.F.489 (Dawkins, Simoneau)
(Labor-Management Relations) would
remove hospilal employees from the
essential employee classification. The
bill would delete noliee of fair share fees
to the commissioner of lhe bureau of
media1ion services and require notice of
~
,
o
86
LMC Cities Bulletin
o
unfair labor practice complaints. It would
also modify procedures to initiate nego-
tiations and for interest arbitration pro-
ceedings. Disciplinary actions against
non-probationary employees, other than
teachers, would be subject to grievance
procedures and compulsory arbitration.
CB
'----
Certified Iirst responders, death
benelits
H.F. (R. Peterson) (Employment)
would give certain certified fust respond-
ers to accidents the same death benefits
as peace officers. Companion to S.F.162.
CB
Employee wage protection
S.F.372 (Chmielewski) (Employ-
ment) would authorize the department
of labor to establish a fund to assure
payment of wages for a maximum of
four workweeks or $2,000, whichever is
less, to employees of an employer that
has filed for bankruptcy and that has uo
assets from which to pay wages. The
proposal would authorize the depart-
ment of labor and industry to recover
wages, costs, and a 25 percent penalty in
a, stale action. The bill would appropri-
ate $200,000. CB
Plant closing, severance pay
S.F.373 (Chmielewski) (Employ-
ment) would require employers with at
least 100 employees for at least six months
in the preceding year to give 120 days
writteu notice to affected employees,
employee organizations, and the affected
municipality before cornmencing a fa-
cility closing, relocation, owuership
change, or reduction in operation, if a 20
percent reduction in employment would
result. The bill would require the de-
partment of jobs and training to provide
direct assistance to affected employees,
grants or loans to affected workers who
have been employed for at leasl three
years, and continuation of employer-
paid health coverage for at least 120
days. CB
o
Pay equity, implementation report
and state review
S.F.488 (Bergliu, Reichgott, Piper,
Brataas, DeCramer) (Governmental
Operations) would specify that equitable
February 17, 1989
compensation relationships occur when
the average compensation for female-
dominated classes is equal to the aver-
age compeusation for male-dominated
classes of comparable skill, effort, re-
sponsibility, working conditions, and other
relevant work-related criteria. The bill
would require political subdivisions to
submit an implementation report by
January 31, 1992, showing job classes
and size, gender balance and domina-
tion, comparable work values, salary
ranges, and average compensation, to
allow the state to detennine whether the
subdivision has established equitable
compensation. The bill would prohibit
wage reduction. Consultation would be
available for necessary changes. CB
Plant closing, severance pay
S.F.51O (Chmielewski) (Employ-
meut) would require employers with 50
or more employees where payroll aggre-
gates al least 2,000 hours per week to
provide 120 days written notice to af-
fected employees, employee represen-
tatives. and the state prior to ordering a
plant c10siug or mass layoff. The bill
would set peualties for violations, and
create a cause of action for employees
and local govenmlent units. The pro-
posal would require severance pay to
certain employees, and would require
the continuance of health care coverage
for up to 18 months, with the employer
responsible for the employee's share for
120 days after plant closing. CB
8peciallegislation
Austin: General fund expenditure
for development
H.F.181 (Reding) (Economic De-
velopment) would allow Austin to assist
an approved development organization
using funds from the city's unencum-
btred general funds. Effective after
approval by the Austin city council. SH
Bloomington: Volunteer firefighter
pension, survivor benelits
S.F.498 (Belanger, Freeman) (Gov-
ernmental Operations) would allow the
association to provide disability pen-
sions for volunteer firefighters for duty-
related or non-duty-related injury or iII-
ness. The proposal would set pensions
for surviviug spouses and depcndcnts of
volunteer firefighters who died in thc
line of duty. Pensions would be at 75
percent of a 20-year veteran's pension
for the spouse and at 12 percent for each
child. CB
Mankato: PolIing places
H.F. 426 (Dom, Frederick, Ostrom,
Scheid, OsthofO (General Legislation,
Veterans Affairs & Gaming) would au-
thorize Mankato to designate polling
places for three precincts at sites more
than 3,000 feet outside precinct bounda-
ries if no suitable locations within the,
allowable distance are available. Such
polling places would need to be no more
than four miles from precinct bounda-
ries. Effective upon approval of the
Mankato City Council and is effective
until December 31. 1991. AH
Mora: Negotiation of certain
contracts
H.F.481 (Peterson, Hasskamp,
Lasley, D. Carlson) (Local Govenmlent
& Metropolitan Affairs) would author-
ize Mora to privately negotiate one or
more contracts for the acquisition and
betterment of the Mora municipal was-
tewater treatment facility, provided that
the city council first detennines by reso-
lution that the procedure will be eco-
nomically advantageous to the city. CB
"Year of the Cities" resources
program for Iirst class cities
H.F.540 (Clark, Pappas, Vellenga,
Greenfield, Munger) (Financiallnstitu- ,
tions & Housing) would makc an appro-
priation to the conunissioncr of state
planning for community resource pro-
grams in Duluth. Minneapolis, and St.
Paul. Such programs would include:
crime prevention services, employment
training, community organizing, child
care services, fanlily counseling, chemi-
cal dependency counseling, and other
services. (See story on page 1.) SH
"Year oCthe Cities" neighborhood
revitalization for Iirst class cities
H.F.541 (O,Connor, McLaughlfn,
Wynia. Jefferson, Boo) (Financial Insti-
tutions & Housing) would make an
appropriation for neighborhood revitali-
87
zation programs in Duluth, Minneapo-
lis, and St. Paul. The bill would set
requirements for eligibility, certification,
allocation, and city matching funds. (See
story on page 1.) SH
"Year of the Cities" education grants
for first class cities
S.F.381 (Donna Peterson, Pogeml1ler,
Solon, Lantry, D. Moe) (Education) would
make an appropriation to the department
of education for grants to address "at
risk" students in inner city schools in
Duluth, Minneapolis, and St. Paul. The
bill would set requirements for project
plans and allowable activities. Eligible
programs could target preschool. minor-
ity students, summer school, tutoring.
transportation. and others. Each school
board would need to submit its plans by
July 15,1989. The bill wouldapppropri-
ate $8,700,000 in fiscal year 1990. (See
story on page 1.) SH .
Inver Grove Heights: Fee on waste
facilities
S.F.376 (Metzen) (Enviromnent &
Natural Resources) would permit Inver
Grove Heights to impose a fee on waste
facilities within its boundaries. The fee
could not exceed $1 per cubic yard of
waste. The city could use proceeds from
this fee for any general fund purpose.
Effective after city council approval.
SH
St. Peter: Municipal hospital board
and economic development authority
S.F.414 (David Frederickson) (Local
& Urban Government) would allow St.
Peter to provide for a seven-member
hospital board and a nine-member eco-
nomic development authority. CB
Transportation
Limits on Interstate highway
acquisition In metro area
H.F.612 (McLaughlin, Wagenius)
(Transportation) would limit construc-
tion on, and acqnisition of, land in the
metro area for interstale highway seg-
ments that pass throngh estilblished resi-
dential areas. CB
Trucks, special four-unit
combination
S.F.447 (DeCramer, Pnrfeerst,
Langseth, Frederick, Novak) (Transpor-
tation) would authorize special permits
for 110-foot combinations of four ve-
hicles to operate. with restrictions, on
interstate highways. The bill would set
permit fees, provide for designation of
interchanges, streets, highways, and rest
areas. and would require a stndy and
report on the effect of such vehicles. The
bill would appropriaite $503.000 and
would sunset August 31, 1993. CB
o
Regional railroad authorities, joint
powers agreements
S.F.477 (Kroening, Purfeerst,
McQuaid. Merriam, Novak) (Transpor-
tation) would allow regional railroad
authorities to enter into joint powers
agreements, and to enter agreements with
other authorities. CB
Correction
County economic development
anthorities; development alliances, Bul-
letin 5, page SI. This bill applies only to
areas outside the metropolitan area.
o
S8
LMC Cities Bulletin
I
I
I
, i
i
, ,
, ,
, i
o
~
'-
o
'""--,
'Federal Update
Bush budget puts cities' programs at risk
Although President Bush has indicated
to Congress and the public that ,he in-
tends to help cities fight problems and
violence caused by drug trafficking, as
well as homelessness and weakened local
economies, he made no mention of the
future funding levels for most of the
current federal programs for cities.
President Bush's budget message was
also silent on the question of revenues to
pay for new initiatives. Nor did he
comment on cuts that would most cer-
tainly occur to produce the required
reduction in the federal deficit under
Granun-Rudmann.
Frank Shafroth, director ofNLC federal
relations, has said that the budget ap-
pears to put cities in a box and offers
little alternative to steep cuts in key
programs. As he pointed out in the
February 13. issue of Nation's Cities
Weekly, the Bush administration's new
FY'90 proposed budget calls for $30
billion in new spending for the Presi-
dent's priorities, but makes no mention
of the cutbacks that would be necessary
to make up for those costs,
The priorities President Bush identified
for his budget include the following ini-
tiatives important to cities:
* enacting urban enterprise zones;
* increasing funding ($1 billion)foranti-
drug efforts;
* reauthorizing the Clean Air Act;
* funding for parks under LA WCON;
and
* full funding for the McKinney home-
less assistance program.
The Bush tax proposals are also a con-
cern for cities. It is clear that there will
be proposals for new tax increases and
tax expenditures to help reduce the defi-
cit and to finance urban enterprise zone
legislation. But cunent programs for cities
set to expire at the end of the year have
not received support for extensions. Those
include low-income housing tax credits,
single-family mortgage revenue bonds,
largeted jobs tax credi ts, and small issue
industrial development bonds.
Cities and states face the prospect of a
$7.5 billion tax increase in mandatory
Medicare taxes, a proposal President
Reagan requesicd iu his final budget.
" President Bush has continued support
for the mandatory tax. 'The new Bush
tax program will also call for proposals
to extend the federal excise tax, which
would raise $7 billion.
On another front, housing and commu-
nity development, the picture doesn't
improve. No word about expiring hous-
ing and community development block
grants has been forthcoming, so the
outcome of efforts to get program reau-
thorization remain uncertain.
The drug problems that plague cities
have received attention from the Bush
Administration, but although he advo-
'cated an increase in funding for fighting
dmgs, President Bush did not propose
funding drug programs at even the 1988
levels.
The proposed budget did not include
funding to help EPA or cities aid in the
pursuit of a cleaner environment. It did
not even mention sewer treatment con-
struction grants. There is concern that
any increase in funding for acid rain
reduction measures will come at the
expense of other EPA grant programs.
The message on solid waste manage-
ment indicated efforts to reduce the
volwne of garbage by expanding new
technologies to prevent pollution and
minimize waste. ' Source reduction is
, apparently going to become an impor-
tant alternative to current pollution con-
trol regulations. Restrictions on dis-
posal of waste are also expected. The
Bush administration proposals for EPA
include restrictions on the disposal of
wastes. Such restrictions could encour-
age businesses to comply with source
reduction measures and disposal restric-
tions.
With regard to transportation, the budget
proposals failed to indicate funding lev-
els for public transportation, highways,
bridges, and airports. NLC viewed that
as discouraging, noting that all would
potentially be subject to severe reduc-
tions in funding. The administration is
,considering eliminating federal funds
for operating subsidies for transit. To
finance FAA operations and more air
traffic controllers, taxes ou airport users
and aviation fuel may increase. AU
February 17, 1989
Fl
I..:..,.
-
League of Minnesota Cities
183 University Avenue East
St. Paul, MN 55101-2526
Phone: 612.227-5600
FAX: 612-221-0986
The League of Minnesota Cities publishes,
the Legislative Bulletin weekly during the
Legislative session. Subscriptions: members-
$20; non-members-$35. Contact: Rose
Minke, League of Minnesota Cities.
Donald Slater
Executive Director
Deb Nyberg
Assistant Editor
Jean Mehle Goad
Editor
League of Minnesota
Cities Legislative Staff .
..
Joel Jamnik
Envirorunent, personnel,
public safety, general govern-
ment
Laurie Hacking
LGA, taxes, finance
Stanley Peskar
Pensions, personnel, public
safety
Donald Slater
Development tools
Ann Higgins
Federal legislation, elections,
ethics
Sarah Hackett
Legislative analyst
Barry Ryan
Tax policy analyst
, Chuck Bicbler
Legislative assistant
Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities Legislative Staff
Vern Peterson
Executive Director
Roger Peterson
Director of Legislative Affairs
;
I
I
~, i
01
I
IIRSl CI ASS
Us. POSIACI
PAID
511',1111, MN
PI RMIT NO, :122J
):
James E. Schrantz
Admr.
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Where to get legislative information at the Capitol*
Copies of bilIs
House Chief Clerk's Office - 296-2314, Rm. 211, State Capitol
Secretary of Senate's Office - 296-2343, Rm. 231, Slate Capitol
---".
BiIi status, authors, companion, committee referral (by bill number,
author, or topic)
House Index - 296-6646, Rrn. 211, State Capitol
Senate Index - 296-2887, Rrn. 231 State Capitol
Weekly committee schedules, bili Introductions, and summaries of
committee and Door action
House Information Office - 296-2146, 175 State Office Building
Senate Information Office - 296-0504, Rm. 231, State Capitol
. Recording of tbe following day's committee schedule and agenda,
(after 4:30 p.m,)
"House Call" (House committee schedule) - 296-9283
Senate Hotline (Senate committee schedule) - 296-8088
To reach a member on tbe House or Senate l100r
House Sergeant at Arms - 296-4860
Senate Page Desk - 296-4159
To notify tbe governor's office of your concerns
Governor Rudy Perpich - 296-3391, Rm. 130, State Capitol
*AII addresses are St. Paul, MN 55155, all area codes 612
)
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
COPIES TO: City Clerk and Administrator
FROM:
DATE:
'P:n';1,4.;n'] T"Ior~,..-rmon+-
March 1, 1989
REFERENCE: t:'t:'lU>TTl\~V lqRq Mnni-hly Rni1dinq nppartmpnt Re1;>ort
I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for the Month
of February 1989:
BUILDING PERMITS
18 Residential
1 Remodeling/Finishing
-1 Porches/Decks
21
PERMITS
21 Building Permits
1 Renewal Permit
14 Heating Permits
1 Heating Repair
16 Hook Up (Sewer)
16 Plumbing Permit
2 Septic Permit
16 Water Meter Permit
18 Certificates of Occupancy
31 Contractor's License
APPROXIMATE VALUATION
$1,815,000.00
3,500.00
6,000.00
$1,824,500.00
FEES COLLECTED
10,052.50
34..25
295.00
15.00
400.00
992.00
50,00
800.00
72.00
775..00
$13,485..75
Total Building Department Income--February 1989
Total Building Department Income--YTD 1989
Total Va1uation--February 1989
Total Va1uation--YTD 1989
$13,485..75
$27,426.57
$1,824,500...00
$3,628,905.00
Houses YTD (1989) - 35
Houses YTD (1988) - 24
Houses 1988 - 356
Houses 1987 - 381
)
v'
Official
DA/jp
o
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
City Council
n;'\v; rl A 1 mgn.n
~
Ma'-C'b 7. 1969
Barry Cllck
Attached is a brief history of our situation with Barry Gusk. I
believe the wait is all done and that he is going to have to
comply like everyone else. Therefore, I request the Council make
a decision on how this should be handled.
"
.'/~''}-<~_;''''..c''.''''''
"
01~ .l.
~~
,~~.:~~~_....._~:,..:rt.
CITY of ANDOVER
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO FILE: 2149 NW 161st Avenue and
3149 NW 162nd Lane
IN RE:
d'Arcy Bosell, zoning Administrator
Conversation with Dave Almgren, Building Official
FROM:
DATE:
10 January 1989
Dave advised that Barry Gusk called in response to my letters of
January 3, 1989. Dave advised him again that he did not send a
letter to the City setting out his time frame within which to
bring his property into compliance, nor has he done anything all
summer in regard to sod, landscaping or fencing.
Barry told Dave that he would make certain he and I lost our jobs
over this and then called Jim Elling, the Mayor.
Jim Elling talked with Barry and basically supported the staff's
posi tion.
We are to wait a while longer before proceeding any further. The
most probable course of action would be to bring him before the
City Council similar to Scott Foyt and Heidelberger/Lutz.
/1
c:lO'du
d'Ar~
o
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
3 January 1989
Mr. Barry Gusk
2149 NW 161st Avenue
Andover, MN 55304
In Re: Ordinance Violation
Dear Mr. Gusk:
Please be advised that you are in violatipnaf Ordinance No.8,
Section 8.08 Parking, in that you have 'allowed to be parked at
your property located at 2149 NW 161st Avenue commercial vehicles
as well as the number of vehicles.
Back in 1986 we struggled with this issue and it was at that time
that you made application for and constructed a building for the
purpose of containing your business at 3149 NW 162nd Lane. At
the time the business moved to this address, the business
vehicles were also to be moved.
I understand that you had had'some difficulty with vandalism and
that you were going to temporarily locate your vehicles at your
residence. It has been at least six (6) months since you last
spoke with us in this regard and the vehicles are still illegally
parked. One of the problems you had mentioned back in May of
1988 was the gas line location. I have been in contact with
North Central Natural Gas and they.have indicated that the gas
line has been moved and your lot is now clear for fencing.
Upon receipt of this letter it is expected that you will move at
once the business vehicles to the business location and that they
not be parked at your residence any longer. Further, that you
begin at once to begin the process for the erection of a fence at
the business address so that that property is also in compliance
with the Ordinance.
If you have any questions, I am at City Hall on Tuesday and
Friday from 8:00 to 4:30. It is expected that I will hear from
you within one (1) week from the date of this letter. Failure
to do so will result in my forwarding this matter on to the City
Attorney for resolution.
Sincerely,
o d~ &xlc!LC
:d'Arc~osell
Zoning Administrator
o
CITY of ANDOVER
ZONING ISSUE WORKSHEET
FOLLOW-UP
Date:
In Re:
20 May 1988
2149 NW 161st Avenue
Issue:
Non-compliance with Ord. 78 and Ord. 8
I spoke with Dave Almgren on May 17th in regard to the Gusk
Heating & Air Conditioning building located at 3149 NW 162nd
'Lane.
Pursuant to Ordinance No, 8, the parking of'commercial vehicles
is not allowed in a residential district. At the present time
the employees are driving to this residence, parking their
personal vehicles a~d taking the Gusk vehicles to the shop,
loading them up (or at the house they are loaded) and then head
out for the day.
Barry Gusk's son Brian advised Dave today that they reason they
are parking the vehicles at home is that they are non-union and
that the trucks have been sabotoged by some union workers. So
far they have had three engines ruined because of something being
put in the gas tank.
In regard to the site at 31~~ NW 162nd Lane, the reason the
fencing has not been completed is because the gas company has a
line running down the property which cuts the property in half.
They were supposed to come out and relocate that line and to
dated they have not. Once 'that is done, then they will proceed
to fence the area as required.
Dave Almgren was going to contact the gas company and speed them
up a little (they don't even have easements for the location of
this line). Dave further asked Gusk to put in writing the above
information and also make an estimate as to how long before the
property will be in compliance.
Close tabs should be kept on this matter.
o
",('
o
o
Febuary 23, 1989
Dear Mr. Mayor,
I attended the city council meeting of Feb. 21st when the council
awarded the certificate of appreciation to the fire department
for all the hard work they had done when they fought the tire fire
on Bunker Lake Blvd. I would like the council to know that Rescue
personnel were also there giving of there t:iJne to be available
to help the fire department out as much as we were able. The
council might not be intormed that all rescue personnel are not
firefighters. I am sure this was just an oversight on your part
but we are also out there for the satety of Andover.
Thank You,
"', V'l'.60..- ':J ~V'I'... "::><::Y"Y\.
" Linda Johnson
Rescue Personnel
cc Council
Jacobson
Knight
Orttel
Perry
.-
,'"
,
0 (All
1988 COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
expenditures for year except bond payments and escrow refunds)
Item
Legal, attorney services
Engineering
Administrative & Accounting
Managers compensation
Ditch repair (moving dirt)
All other expenditures
Total 1988 expenditures
Expenditures
in 1988
$ 44,524.33
119,737.97
114,673,06
9,548.13
15,888.00
25,055.70
$ 329,427.19
% of Total
Expenditures
13.5%
36.4%
34.8%
2..9%
4,8%
7.6%
100%
Note: Less than 5%, of 1988 expenditures went for actual ditch
repair (moving dirt) while over 95% went for legal, engineering,
administration, accounting and other items..
o
,. .q 22 ,.., CooN C(~EE.I<. W/J.TG-RSilii-blJls7i<-,~F-r=-..-i.-'E;:i/5ii(ji2Es------
l. ,'.... ,........-.. -.., ,. - '. , . ".., ..-.--.,.-.,..--------.,-..__._____f.... '___,._
( p,L'::-: -r=.~.0.!~."!.e'T(Jf?. ~~. Fot?, y /5.AR 1~.:i._=__fE."I__J?_ON2-p_A'Int~'TS ",,..10 E"SCIl.OW REfCif/'l9.sJ
'~:~i,!"~':"~:: c~,.l,&0f,rs;~S.~~:~~=;~~~~~;~~~J
1/1 ~ g -.. _ ~ ..-'" ,_---,- '. _!.S ~ V'~ ~e:S; ! '1" ~ =~~~ICA=-~ ~!:1~~~~~~ ~E~:r:~~~-_ :~_~~Q~~
r~H,&>~l'--. .J~_.2...3?,_~S!.~ -I, pl;(;';W1~~.. ~. 815!?-'f. - __~'r. . O1..C - L~ _.~~;; .t:3/~ ~oo _u.. 2'1~ J.!:
liF~!Ol --- '0 2.1 JJ-\~.9- .).J.. _. 310pjJ 35, /I 7i~ ~~ _ .' ._ ~ L r~ _ ~ ~.'~ _:.+ __ _ _.q 00 _ _ _ _' g~ .~-'-
,PR II _ .____~+;l..'{.'.-.? L/I_ !Pli;8 15 .I~ I(i~r~_?! u ~~...:-''lI ~!"!:..=I- __ .. - f---- "_=
_ ~;25 -.,___L~4..J_K!~JI{ __ ___ _ _. :-:-__ .. . ~ ~b _ t.f /J tfls' ,75 r. 3.5)1t; [" 0< -
1(Yl1~~( 1 ,'. _l9-J.~?fo_a:4'7 _. }~i'IS;{C 1.3~ .~~1_1-~71.~ n' . t~.~ </0 l~.?I~.~f-_l~_~ q_~
;'('1"'1?l3 .-----.1 f2-J~..Q.'1,:4>_~91_ _11...= .. ~ltPL~I"1. ~l.;.t-' ~ .,.[~...lt (J~ :.~..'b-.,;.. '.~.:. -:._ :- itIH~. o~ . j~~ ~~
?~f'( l.3I-_.._.~<]_J-~9.-M~ Z __ Jlff . J~I_.Sllf~~[J r~~+I~J- gs ,." ~n ~ .._ J.:J.~ , :l.r/?J
l~: j?---..9.F4;i:~JI- -1:,= I.' ~t~.i~ ~~ ~-~ l ~I~~~, . ~ ~~'';:8~ u-"o~,. ~, J b;6i[~-~
f.~ ~":::!~;1:k.; f :1;)3 i ~. ~~I~ ~~ ~:~ ~~~ I ~H P _:: 1. "'so - ~-~~~ i~ ,
t'ld;) . '0' a~O.71 Pff~71'I! ~r~~5i -glg~!j8'>- -~n lL_ +..; u --r.:. ,
t'l'il a . ...: h;:J~2.~o:11 ~..l~,111I5C~/~'i;:C: YrZ DC:: ::: :. : f~*~ '
'I~!~ 1'~:1t1i~'if:. ~~I;fr ... ;1~i] =:~~~~ ~ ji,~:==~:~ ::;~~~ :
~~~I~;-- "IP-,.b1~-~fJ .. .:JIU&9a-11l31; i(--~~~.9.~~ _c._~ j9? -. - _.."...= -- f- :1:.1100 :
16ECi/:A.I.----;i1!,.ii).jjj- ;e.I~~'i 7J" - jllQGa~ hn ~+'--- -IT;!~----.-... _ ---~i..a.i~
~~lj~=..~;,~~'fFi,I.:,::lt~~-:.~~"~:. Jg c.:.~ :. em~
! i -... - -tl.J ! I ' II L '. -.., . .,.. __. _1__ L d._ _.. __ . nH __ _ _, ._ ,. f . 1
.jrro'i'tll . ..JJ 9, 4). 7. J ~ {.fl{~ailfI33 II i'1713719' 114 ~ 71-< o( ~ If~ IJ 11~1<i; (Mf OC 70
.
-j ..., _ -..,L_f-_'.'" ...__. ",'" if " I.
I ..~.:.;: '~i, ~ : I:' r
"I ,.,___ ,.'.n_ ____._.,___,.., _ _ ,", ,__ '. .. n__, ,._...,~ L' ... ... '_ :1 it , .. I _ 2
I ; ~ ~
i .........__
I; , - I, . - 2:
...l, ....... ~f- __.... __
I~;' i~ _ _ --I:: .~ ._. _ _. ,._ _._... _.. .~__ 2!
I: .
o
0'
...-,"
"!
... -- '"1''' ,. -- - -, .n '" _.
2
, I .., I ",'. ...-~-~:'.'..~=.~~~~:. -- __n, - I '.:. .,,'.' r ~~ = ~ ::;. '.,:~ .. --
, .... ....,. n.._____.. ....---.... - 1- '" .-, --+1-- .- - .. ,- '-t- ,- ,
,
',n.. ........._.._..__.,. '..' ..... ,I I... . ...,..' __ ,. ,.. ... _....__ ,_._ ._ ..,. _ _, _ _,.. ._,
I ' . , I' i
,: .. .,., Ti , 3:
,[ -::~_=-- ==:: ~..." ......: :, .-::: ::;;i: _u m ~ -: =::::~ -e::: : .n= :
---.+.- --- .-.. -- -- - -.- - -.. "1-:: Ii
'. -.. .j. _._._-.-. ..-.-.-------.,." - ...... .... I.." .. ..- -t- -.. .... .;. -~.I-- - '-.........; --.. ... .~. - _. -. ._.
I I II Ii I
"\1 '_____n___....... ,..,.. i -- I, I ... n_ . Iii _ f- 1=- -t- _ 1= ~ :::- 31
,i...... ...-.---- ... .. -. ". i . . - I: .,- - I' ...-! ~ 1 TT -- -.,.. .
"II . .,. .,-,. '.. .,.--.,.,..-,-,..-.--... -'I'" t! I' .. ~ - c. -~. nt ' : i Tn .' I. - i r-- ::
, ..-. .,... -.-..-.,---.-----.... -:- _.. - -!-i' _n 11'-' 7 - -.. -i- t- - , :; 'I" i Ii 1- '""; -1- -. ;-;~ J. r
" ! - '.,--",,'.'-' -.......'" .. J. -.' ' ,',' '" ."-,," ..Ii"" ".."h_".,"_,=_=~-=:c '."_:'C:='c' ....,'_,~...=~.,.=~_.=h..-. _ _ '.
31
3'
'I ""I~ ,; I \)r.Wio-tl.
t;;:"., "'l::
MAnr It' u!' ^
o
o
P A ~ /iO. / ((J
(ST/) It::... AU/.)I r )
9.
FUND EQUITY DEFICITS
At December 31, 1986 and 1987, the following funds had fund equity
deficits:
December 31
Special Revenue Funds
"S09" Planning
Ditch 41
Ditch 58
Di tch 11
Ditch 39
Ditch 44
Ditch 52
Ditch 59
Ditch 60
1986 1987
$ 14,901 $
8,878
12,680
1,368 2,618
616 2,623
2,004 6,035
30 30
74,426 84,039
398 1,915
Capital Projects Funds
Ditch 41
Ditch 57
1,618
187,459
1,618
208,410
Fund equity deficits in special revenue funds for Ditches 11, 39, 44,
52, 59 and 60 will be retired by future maintenance levies of
special assessments.
The fund equity deficit for the Ditch 41 capital project fund will be
retired by closing it out against the Ditch 41 special revenue fund.
The fund equity deficit for the Ditch 57 capital project fund will be
retired when the project is ordered via future special assessments and/
or bond proceeds,
10. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
In September 1987, a citizen of the District appealed a $50,000
maintenance levy, payable in 1988, against Ditch 58. In August
1988, the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources determined
the $50,000 assessment to be invalid. The District has appealed
this determination to the Minnesota Court of Appeals. In the
event of an unfavorable outcome, the Ditch 58 Special Revenue
Fund would have to decrease taxes receivable and deferred tax
revenue by the amount not yet collected on this levy, In
addition, any amounts collected in 1987 and 1988 would have to
be refunded.
- 16 -
~
o
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
Comparison of 1988 Administrative budget amount with actual
1988 expenditures for legal, engineering, administration,
accounting managers fees.
Year 1988
Item
Attorney's fees
Engineering costs
Administrative & Accounting
Managers fees
Budqet
$12,000.00
41,000,00
47,500.00
9,500.00
Actual spent
$ 44,524.33
119,737,97
75,452,61
9,548.13
9ver budqet
*
*
$27,952,61
48,13
* Over Administrative budget amounts for attorney's fees and
engineering costs could not be determined because administrative
amounts for these two items were not listed separately from Ditch
and 509 projects on the billing sheet presented to the Watershed
Board for payment.
'1l!J4'...s/;\ly.N,I;'~UQ,'" As!:..". ,L-ooN L;::..EE./::.. WATE)(:::,H'ct) ,P' I..:. I/<!-(<'" I
P [}j'1:t~~~~t6b~~(2(/ ~ ..-....-..-" . .,.. p~E2 ~I 8 q B. 'i B '-'- DGEi'r--' '... -.::.
Au (j. fr.J /.<f gg - . .. .... . . .N6... - ~ ... ...., .-.-_.=~.
01.... ..,"-'-t:... '.' .'" -=i........-. .--;.. ...-....,-:.- --..~"~=.---=-='---=---~.~~
'1,4-.J~'N ,s;>-RJ.v".._.L. /'187., 1'187 :. /9",2 , 1'122 .! 1'l32 L 1'13'1 .
:. _. BJd.Cj...Q--+ ~.______....J .f5<-<d1-C:t.: AdvJ.I- :..'Bv..d".n.-/- :,Ad-~t.: i!..Pro/ccrED Lrs...d'1~f
I 'ICATA~oo~,_:! I; _ i. ; +.; 1b...b!LL-b l7.b,/g~.1 .
I ___. !1-...-.--..-----lk=-L-~-. i~ --!-:--.--i~. -L. -il. ._..L-_!L.. -- .L.__~__ ~- .;
2 .l':.I,4('1fGE.Y-~ffi.,!'-- ~Sl" O!....'.'1_~,11.~~L91__._~y.~.!'.O,_.?,.~~11.~i-_--~!"7~2~7j_ 9:2.00.?<:::
J _;;"'_C! f':! E.~); /.t::JS? 3...1 2-~'~'I......L~ri~s:til._.lf..I.p-2..~-o.~I--[~2S 1_~!! --:2J1.~ 7~.~ -'! _3.~;~.~.~_:-c.;
.,L. J _J.j_.p..~: N U:._l&d:TtVE;~ 3~Fo 0; Ol-~.9-f?1.1~ __~'~i.s:.~_~ooll_2,1j.<?i?.'t3_~ --~'-i1.-L?~-~~: _~7!3_"~~.1
,.L. S Act'o Nlt,..JG . ~oo OO! . 5oZ2..'1"2.S! "7!S 00:00 .(,,933'7 It 101000001 b (; u., .,":
;, _~bl~.T___ --4$'~'~'~~I-~rz:~.!?~I--4s.=?.0'OO ~~l{J~: ;1_'_~9_9_~'''O?~:__~'?~~_~:
<.' 7 ~.k-g:fr:~.1-- --:;r~~ ~fJll~-12'J --1~9~.- __rz5.4_~I' -ll.U;.:.~~~ l-~:S~.?i
3 J...1=_~~.L. _ _'-2JE-9_0.(jQ __1.1 IJtt_( 1-(.l!?'qo~O -.:..Jj~"C:!..i1.3 _f.. . L2.3}.OI.....f_~7..?2......o.?:1
9 _p..,..ell.:- _ ..J::;'~_'Lo..O. _...:......'ff:J~~O _7"'_~O 4:__ __'_I~:I.o..~; __1S'3!~~_, ___I~~~_~'?:I
,~ Ie 'rE s,PE'r-l.s-L... !>oOOO.-...!:1120'3.~~ooo (SbS-~---2'~~Lz_~--2tJ'OOO<J1
11 _-:r.N_IE~I5s:.T _ _L~~~~? ----.~=.;-- _-42.~~~ ----I " ~-I-I~---I~'I.-==-...i
;~ ~;:j~~-~r~~~- ._~~:.: --- _Td.L~.._._~~::: -~-I'{ 02:SI--(~~;'---"~:~'~~i
:; t.lJ>.{~1 ~F:~~,,~ :- {,b.~ .:. = -.= ~~/'/-;::; ,J-:-.r=' 1 =~I:-l 21:~;~.i
~~ -- --.--u----I-u..-~..-l-- ---~-I-..--.-.-----.,I-.--I...---.-I"---..I-----I-~--I-.-..!
c, .__._~ ~Ioi;;~-1-~J-1.;: /;;~-:~-~.~.i>I,-~-'-~.2Si~:-~.oa~-~':s:-b 77~~..i.8122J ;;- ~;?~" 0 .:~.!
. ~~ _.n_ .,1.----. , --. --'l==II-"'~--~-"":=---I!-"-=!'----II---I"-"-:-II-"-1--.....\l~-I.---~-.:l
~ I I ~-::;-1 ~ I Wti ...! ' .. ~., .~, I
~~ _-=e'L r~1~t .~ So 0000011 30l/.{.8 /711 5'0100000 II '5::;3"11617"1Ii CFII4 {, "13Sii 7~o 0000.:
" :. .-. 'II=~=== ~t=b~ '==If-::t~~j__~=I_-tI-=1
~~ ~..~~CJ2.J.....c:lr:'!.-:+ .. SI 00 0 oell 3~' 2.Soolr- go 0.0 ooil Slo '00011 5;01'&0011 320000"
2:: I _ I' I_ft. 'I ',/ 1_' 1-' I"! ,!
~~I =--: '=-.:-=--=-==-=1::--:= : =::::= ': ::== =~-= :=[:==1 ::-~=,==:::i
~: 1----.- - .........-.---..-----......-1 ,.' I I' - -I- ''''--''':j- ...... r-""""-' '..........:..----.. ..._-':... ....-- i - ....--1----.... .!
::1--------...-.-.--.- ..I.... r "'-r "'1"" -..II"'"....r.- .---I.--.-T ...I..,..j ,... i---..j-.--...- ",
: .!-....... .. .--.. -.,- .-.. ..--- rl" . !... . -j !. ...1 i \' .. i " ..-.-. ]1- 1. ....... :1...--/..-..... -:
"I ...,...... I, : .. ... , ._. ....._,:_,_..... :\.....-.., ..... ... L.....:..... .
.1 :1 i : ; , i' : : 'I :
'.,.........-,....' ',., " I; I .,. ........:'-,.,..:........._.,:'..-..~-...._' ':
. .. ... ....u. -. ...-. - ;\ I-II I... ...1.... i ...... ....I.. - i.. -......... il...- ~ i-..... ..:
.-.-...-...-......-.. i,...I~I..... iI.. -.1- .'. ....1- .-1 ,!. ..- .~ 11.-..- +-.... :1
'... ..-.....--...1- -"1' .! ,., ......i . ..!-....T......--:I...-..'--'.... '1
~ .'.- .... ..... ... ... -- - :. . I'. ,- . ~....- .1" .-. -;\;.<, . \. { i'i i!~ - ..-. i" .. .-. t-: I .' '1' ;- .-...- I .1
.. -. .......---..... ...... I. , 1'- .....,.. I'" '--"I"'--""T- ,. . ". .... .. ...1" .......- '1' -. 1.-... :..r-
.'... ...~_____.__! ..............._ ,. i__ ~.~~~._ '_"'_ J _.......... ....__________, __...._~.._._ I
, " I ::. ....I :! r:.\'" I ; ~:{ ", j , ., I; I ' :1 I
. , .. . " I ...........
."B'
i ..... --
Ol._.-....,!i
..I
I. ... .
. . I
. _u .... I.
:'.J --.--.r~i'
" 1 , '
: ._ ......_. ,1 .
., I:
(. .
, .
~ ,,'1 W6-C;;-~---~'~3-~k ' L.)!'h'ISJICJ-15-~-;:1r -"'1- F-e-'---,-' LArc~-~'~--
,{ '_____..._______C_ __ " ,. ,_.__ L..Lf..L(;_, -.-~1fL2J'1_d___I ___._ EL__
~.. YS::0./~_' FJ?L_.JJj1fLf."J.u:'I+_ ,__ F..~) i i\ C"CIJ\,~--+;1Jd_ltli..(\ i$.1rc\1iflj cr- ACCOtt r.-fi r1~__
~ ~:::-::,::-:=~..~:-::,::,==~~=:::..
0: -.~:td-e.-~=-~ff:d~~~-D~=;' '~j(~i~7~; ;~~>D.I,~~'{i:l~~r~~~~l~:;SI:-i~~12:i=_i'~I~ 1~-(~;~~~ll~1 d ~T~~i:=r~:-
i' - - ---.. -n ~ 1\ j --- ~ '- Dr"kk I'riJI'trJ, f);tr.r. ,fIV.'" ._Jr__..,- 1-- ~C::;...lL- _Ill. (< ~L-T"
T~-;~ ~-:~~~t- ~:-;::~: :1~-(h;d~;~{!!I: (Y~~gl~O~i~:~t.,.~.~i~:;.~_~i~~ ~:__~O~~~_ ~~!~~f~~ 1
fe.1~;l. .._._._.!-'--__:, _ ::I~ 51:: .:::5[1 J I ~1f !;l.8. f- _ ?~ 33. f-l~61'l ~ _. _ .~ U: ~~ ~ ~_ 2
(l\oL~r; .__.____.I~___: __ JI;;HI;6~?~.171~1~'O~__ !.elc~__ :H5S__n~l;l'[: _&~1.Zg3
Af~(J _____ __!J___. __ I"n/~ lj(l~ft_7J__,.,>.~C>8 _ ~d~.~___JI~..?O ,;l~~?.~ 4
Aft .~~ ___ /' _.._ _ _ ._:, -1_ . ~I~!~~ 3.~, -I- I 6~1~ f~ __ \?~ 13 .:10 f r! ~ 10 Ir?~ 5
~lfl ocr 1____ ..l..!.___ _ _ /88:1 ;Zij j311 Q,; _ _I~q ~; 1'1._ I[~'H.' __ _ ...= _ 7.LIJ Zli Ii
(l1Ay~3, --~--- .-!..!.---. -1- 1- 1 ?1'6~SI17g;;lr--IQl ~"$-3 _C~~q~ -- ...=. - ~.L~ )
,?~_d ._____, /. , _1.. 1.,1',1 Lf,13 ,n'l ,~ ?(I$Lf-J23ID!~J~J:;._-_5.Q?~~--1..0~ ,t.~ '~_._,~!1 8
I;rWl\_~1 _____ __..l.'-_. _ _ _ ~:I 4J19g~_f-I_~_l~r;,.2.__ 7H~ _ _..l~ _~~ 'lL$fo 9
IIi:s<}y_JJ,_____ I- __ ':1"t -'. ~I~~J.~.CZ ~~ I~~ I- _~I~/~___, J 6().~10
11 Jl</~_~~___ ,_I_~______.. _ _ :3Iq~/ /~ '" 6~1 (U.~ ~P~?_4' __J.';;~G.''i?G ...I.~r~. '75 (P6 ,;'?$. 11
I' IllA~, ?___n__.-l...'-._.., _ .I,I! ~ I P ~~i; ~L 1_ L ~~'~/&L ~..' k1... :?,.I~ 1_ _., ,.Ie ? ..I~ _ ,_~I~ q....... ..In 12
" A. .0.9 ,;l ?--.------~~- '. -- " (3. "J' 1/'13:1. lftI.,., ~ l~6~l I J. .,. _85 - LI:;lt _..?S 1-. -- ,. ,'- JJS 1-:1~.,,1..~.",~ 13
" ~el't jd- ..._...__....!.'-,____ _,I ,_ J i - _ is 1,;)1' QLI ~ ,~ -I- _ J., I..,~ ____ ..15c: __~I{ M 6": 14
I', ~11- .~.G____,_..,_._!!._..__,. _ "il ~7;2 !fi,1. 151~'Zfl7!.., It; ~iJJ~[L._ -I- _~~ f~ 1-.. _... - ~ () 1r,!..Jl 15
11; K^J4 to __.._:__,_n'!..2.....__..' __ .." ~ r I ~'.' J5., r;,~v~ Q~ - Jf ,?I~.. '6'1: ._ - ,'~..'...~' ...'.,.-..,. 2$ _ _ _... - I" l~ ?',- ~."!?'l 16
I' bc:1 ;{II n_ I~.~L-:-_~~.. _ ,., 'Ii !.- 15 8r r1~ _ _~. ..$.96 .n II.d~,..J_ Lll,'~!!L _ ~8 V '(1 17
(l}ov.1~ ,.._JL...::_lf~~'4.'f,.., _ .._ .,., " i.~. 1_ =_ ~~Ilr:t7- _ Ir I. 2a 1_ _l~~~,I./- ~~ ~~~ 10
I" (V'~1/;2I__...Jt._-:J_L=~~~__!_..~/~,{, 70 1111:f;f:~8'-I-_~W~l5~ _t~.54 "g,2,2 ~l{1~~'; 19
;", !>-~~n,.,_____.L~_~~ -~'f""-II-.'fiy.r:77~ . 2,'~r-~g fSrA?, ~t; k:l, ~,t;J,I~\.Qs 9~,I"'<;20
" D,~( J1 u_,!?:_ -~_~L I' !-. I = Ufl,.7!:J.,._ Itml~t; L~ i1~-,._ iH ~.9" 21
, J;'n .1" ') -:::3.0._ -'.".A'i.u, . . ! lu-. '" ?,(;O 'C ..,._~. ~ n JI~I~~ _ ~$ e:~; _ ~ ~,{I{I',s n
;'1 ,'.,. .... ..______ _ _ -II i ] I ___I _iU__I_ -..-fo---- .:_..,._.23
': 1t~~~~&L_=~_ T";tF- 111:'3111 __:q ~:~ :t~$'~J~,~m l~~~:~:_:
I I I I" i( :1 27
u. ,..,..' ..-..,-.....----....., '.', i' " ,-,-- -1."" ~'I-----" -+1--- - ,-,.-. ,-'" ,
....,-----,-....----. -1- i' II - - u -I; . .-1- - _ _0 -1-,,-, :" _ __'~ _': . __ 28
.., ,-,- . -,.------.--, , -I,.", ,! i , I - .. - ._. - - _._ ;" -- - ._,. ,'1.., __ 29
'I I' ,-, ..--.. -.--,-,......---.--.... --1'- ..J+il' . 1.- - - -- . - I- -,- '. I -- 30
') 1- ---,--_._-- 'I' ". '" 11 111" 1- 1- /-.. -[J1- --- ... 11- ---. U: ---- ::
""~__ :~:..::~~~.---------.: -I = -:1 i I 1-- I. _~_ ~ =_.... ,_ rij:i - ===: .... ,:~,;~: :~- 33
0." == ~.:.- ~----- ~ -u ---III: ~.~ .....,_==.1- --_..I~.-f-. ~_;\_L:~ -- --= __..0.___ - -_.;; l' --- ::
_, ,....____._,_____,.,.1 ,) :,,1,- _, _._".',___ '"___,_.. .'.... ..,...,...._..30
" ,,'.... _______ ..,1 -" -I' i, '! '..,-, -, .,. 1 ',- - ,-- J: ' ,..~ +...,1- _,_u ..,' 37
'Ii' .... _ _, ____u ..., ~ _ .' _.., I _,_,. __ ,_ u' u.._' -- '" ''''1_ _ ,...i ._. 38
!!' ' I
..---- -- ,- -.--, .-. -; - - ,- l' .. ,. ,-..,. ,],," ,'- 'f -., " -' - -- !- 'I:' r )-- 39
111 ",'. ,.... ..____________,_:, J1_ _ .. '., ..._.. .. '_' '_. '''P, I' -..- -- .:. ' , ~O
, ..., ...._ .___. ' I 1! i! I. I..Ll.,_~,,~_:=," ,,,l-__,_,,=--,,,,=--,,",!.,._...h-"''',_=_._,' !..1"=_..,,.~.,._ ...,_ __1
. <"n ~ ...~: , "It,,; C("'''.1 ..,'
07!Hlf,',l:I'
MADE INU~,A
.
o
o
~
..
Year
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
T/~ rz.
YEARLY COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
(1974 through 1984)
Total
Expenditures
$ 29,076
76,379
66,192
58,692
55,601
75,524
114,274
87,637
151,890
230,529
835,511
j) G cUrZ
Ditch Repair
Movinq Dirt
$ 21,866
61,991
53,192
18,352
24,492
19,092
67,142
11,985
54,732
30,153
450,114
% of Ditch Repair
To Total
Expenditures
75%
81%
80%
31%
44%
25%
59%
14%
36%
13%
54%
Avq. %
46%
X 1\1 Fcl"!... l'Jl/~"( 1(" (
Co ,., ()/ LFt)
,en () jt , THe Ii 7 T fi (" (+ u)
Tl( (:.
j-JCl/)(T R ~_?()(2. r J
G-J 1\ 1 (:; tL S If €(.)
e,f! s T 12 ((t
/9 '74
T {i IZ
T f-/ f<>_.~ u:;, (- (
/I! 0 TF
, ,4 If(-
A
-To'Tn L
f'tt ,~ J J r-: 'I
LJ r "7!.~ (I.- S ;( €; .J
DO!lf2.0
WAS
..$ 1-1 Ii- G;..T S. T!! k.. fZ-Iv
PRo;:"
f' 7 (I E
6 ~
Co 0\(
(:_.~. /2' S'- . ';'.
FOIL THE.,
y f:-: /1/<,;
19 g 4.
LGI
1-1 (G 'If rt(z-.
I~
'(-/11:::
,j' 0
5f6 "'/, / ?
v'{
WEN! / ff-IJ
7 //;'
/-L<r.J Ii l 0 IT c ri 1<2. t' (//L f P
6f
LAS'
y;r/-\ lL
I f-/ II !\(
Ii! I~
{/ (7 ")
( . 6 (J
19P9.
. C66N . C8.~lf:[< .. u_ Wit TIEf2..5 /-ft:.O -hhr5;i7r<lh;;r'--'i.~-'ipF^,-'jiTU.ii(i,S'--
::; Af?_~' "_"'~" C)(. Ii: H DITu I~/;::S' ''')'1rnr--'iiiJir.l.<~-Jl.'-'-r9g.r;.----____h-''-
o ~:: r~::~~io~ ~;7;~i:;:i~~~~~~~_~?~I::>"~~I~71'~V-~I2:~,'~..~i/'~T7I"tN~.c~..~.e
I:! it.._ .. . ;l::l-CLCluepl.. -'rr"". ~Cv-,,-~1)J{1F''' ~
! il;q ilfll -at}/~1.7~_ o~,~ "i' _[~Ioli~ ii I "1_ _ _~'Oh:::: ==~~'-'=="=' ~:',l?~~'='T'~l~- .:~~
:' ,;1'1 5l -J.('/--'1Jh7.1..btir"i f.t- __ ; I. _ .. i ),' __ _l~?i~L_h" J~rif _g! ~
.! jq 7,,1__&(P)9_"J. ___-j _~il/17:o ... .___<..._ ---1-' ~._ _lCJ5.1l h.__.~L.h_P~
1 Jq 77 .._5g/_lR!l~ i -~~rl'P -1_+_.__+_~~___L_LlI~o._ -~~..<-~rl}~
I, Lq7~_._~s.:-~OL-2_.-LI-4r:V-~ L 'f~' -~r~
'/1 79 7~Js..~tf-,.__: ,__I~"iIf.7 _1__ -/---r- 7_ ~.17~. /1(;1~__~~
'1,/1 ~o!_U.4J_'J,7if: _J_.; :_.i erP .JI 1__._ I'.. ;.. ~~qr.- ~7Jt,.._.$~I~
"!119<J111..~7/-4.~.1'--:d- glg'r' 'I' I_r- I~/I _ 1 J1
'!iI1 9~;J,,-Lt~o .'1ll~9. 3riS~ !, 190I~W "Jt~,=~L~,~t ~:~~==~h~i]
"!~ ~ I~~' " nld r n t5~ <-c; I 1~\'91~ -= ,== = !' nit iJi'0 "'I,e ::
: I' ? Ig g!: :Jd:','l~'l "J,~>",!I t I rt Y' "I : : ~~ ,!.:: n:e- ~ -= ,I'n l' ~~ -= =! ~~g~ =' :
"I 1 II !_.__. .i__.'7
'I In. ..----- Ii' ~-~I~...= ====.1.;= =~="____I_ .. __. 18
'CO I' I ; I:!,. 19
.: I 1.___.. --- I! I j . . -- '1 --- - -';, -- e- -.. -- - -" h_ .-
::::::--= nn .. 11 . 1 I,j n
.t. i I III
I ! i . I I !
II i ill! 1
. ..---.---------.--. i- 'I-JI: - L. il
f' I' I
L_ _ I!; !
~ i I; ;
: I I
. i I ;
I r"
.: I '
1....Ll._
I.! I
. .:._.::==----..: . il :
i,l. II.
, II ;
._h_.______ .__. r -'r -,-
, I
I
I
. I .
J, .
I ,i
_;.~---u-n-.------_.. 1:" =1'
I
~ 0]
__ .___ .. '_' _ _. __ .~ ___ 20
=~_: lh == ~=I':' - == =-. ':1" " n.' ==- -I':' ='. ::
.. '- .- - .. - -.- -I,' -- - -... 1'- .- -. .... .. .-.
,. I:
_. ____"M ..___.__
I', H
21
.,
.',;
1
. .,- ..-.
I
I
I I
I
-- -.-........ --
I
I
25
)"
I
.- - n. .... .-- - H "-1-- - -o' ..
--.-1:"" - --.
. - - - 1 . ._ _ _ .+. .~ _.__ _h .'
....--1- -..
. 26
21
. .- 1__ ..._ . .'_ ___ 28
~ ' t
... .. .' h._ ..-::th --. -I
.. -I- - '-I~t~ 1 ' -t-
19
." I
I
I
,-, j
30
--. _ -... I:: -- ---- -:'~ .. - .- h.
...-... ...+ - -,-- .... -- --.-
I
..--..' --.. .--
:11
... _.. __1'_ . <. no'n
...-.- .--.
:l2
'p
..._ .__._ __ 33
31
.1. -- -...- "'!.:
. '
35
0,
.- - _:.. ..._- .--
:16
31
.4.
:
.h n' .-.... .__ _._ he.. __ _ _. _.._ __. _ _. _ .... . .h.U 38
_'__', '.1 ____ "_~'I\.__'",_, .-..---.. .1' ._._ 31
.. -I'r';-" I .I'-.,.IL_- ----"/1:'-' -I- ---- .10
;;, 1. ....__ ._.... ._ . . '.. ..".L ',..C'=_'"_.,,c..
'n
1"_f"'I, .-"
~ : , :j. ",' -; l', 1: t
,
M^!1f:'p..rU<;<'I
o
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
(A Minnesota Governmental Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
FOR TilE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1976, 1975 and 1974
Revenue and Funding (Note 1): -
Revenue:
Property tax levies
Homestead tax credit subsidy
Local ~overnment aid
Area wl.de tax
Total' Revenue
Funding:
Comprehensive Employment and
Training Act (Note 3)
Total Revenue and Funding
Expenditures:
General and administrative expenses
Project expenditures:
Flood plain study
Creek maintenance~
Engineering
Total Expenditures
Deficiency of operating revenue and
funding over expenditures
Interest l.ncome
Net decrease in fund balance
Fund balance at beginning of the year -
As previously reported
Adjustments (Note 4)
As restated
Fund balance at end of the year
Year ended December 31.
1976 1975 1974
$ 34,324
13,434
339
48,097
16,067
64,164
10,530
53,192
2,470
66,192
(2,028)
1,160
$ 19,846
8,623
339
1,177
29,985
35,581
65,566
12,221
61,991
2,167
76,379
00,813)
2,517
$ 14,926
6,476
339
21,741
21,741
4,178
1,250
21,866
1,782
29,076
(7,335)
1.966
$
(868) $ (8,296) $ (5,369)
38,397
38,397
$ 37,529
46,693
46,693
$ 38,397
54,910
(2,848)
$ 52,062
46,693
L.'
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
(A Hinnesota Governmental Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1977 AND 1976
For the year
ended December 31,
1977 1976
Revenue and Funding (Note 1): -
Revenue:
Property tax levies
Homestead tax credit subsidy
Ditch maintenance levies
Local government aid
Agricultural credit aid
Total Revenue
Funding:
Comp:e~ensive Employment and
Tra1n1ng Act (Note 3)
Total Revenue and Funding
Expenditures: .
General and administrative expenses
Project expenditures:
Overall plan
Creek maintenance
Engineering
Total Expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of o~erating revenue
. and funding over expend1tures
Interest income
68 , 732
13,430
13 , 045
18,352
13,865
58,692
10,040
1,487
11,527
37,529
$ 49,056
$ 42,910
14,560
10,766
339
157
68,732
Net increase (decrease) 1n fund balance
Fund balance at beginning of the year
Fund balance at end of the year
o
$ 34,324
13,434
339
48,097
I 16,067
64 , 164
10.530
53,192
2,470
66,192
(2,028)
1,160
(868)
38.397
$ 37,529
['
o
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
(A Minnesota Governmental Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1978 AND 1977
For the year
ended December 31,
1978
Revenue (Note 1):
Property.tax levies
Homestead tax credit subsidy
Ditch maintenance levies
Local government aid
Agricultural credit aid
Total Revenue
$ 47, 568
15,827
301
340
64,036
Expend i ture s: -
General and administrative expenses
Project expenditures:
Overall :plan
Creek ma1ntenance
Engineering
Total Expenditures
19,491
2,395
24,492
9,223
55,601
Excess of operating revenue over expenditures
Interes t income
8,435
2,792
11,227
Net increase 1n fund balance
Fund balance at beginning of the year
Fund balance at end of the year
49,056
$ 60,283
1977
$ 42,910
14,560
10,766
339
157
68,732
13,430
13,045
18,352
13 ,865
58,692
10,040
1 ,487
11,527
37,529
$ 49,056
L~'.
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
(A Minnesota Governmental Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEl-mER 31, 19n AND 1978
1979
}levenue (Note 1):
Property tax leviea
Homestead tax credit subsidy
Ditch maintenance levies
. Local government aid
Total Revenue
$ 56,260
19,M'"
100
76,004
21,785
174
19,092
34 ,4 73
75.524
480
5.15ii
5,638
60.283
L 65,921
Expend i tures:
General and administrative expenses
Project expenditures:
Overall ~lan
Creek ma1ntenance
Engineering
Total Expenditures
Excess of operating revenue over expenditures
Interest income
Net increase in fund balance
Fund balance a t be ginning of the year
Fund balance a tend 0 f the year
o
I
.;
:i , , : ~ l
1978
$ 47,%8
15,132'1
301
)/lO
64,036
19,491
2,395
24,1.92
_2-.1-~;!
55,601.
8 t 1,35
2,792
11,227
49.056
$ 60 ,183
I .v~
. -
L
o
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
(A Minnesota Governmental Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1980 AND 1979
1980 1979
Revenue (Note 1):
Property tax levies
Homestead tax credit subsidy
Ditch maintenance levies
Permit income
$ 53,042 $
25,420
7
210
Total revenue
78,679
Expenditures:
General and administrative expenses
Project expenditures:
Overall plan
Creek maintenance
Engineering
22,075
67,142
25,057
114,274
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency~ of operating revenue
over expenditures
(35,595)
Interest income
8,528
(27,067)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance
Fund balance at beginning of the year
Fund. balance at end of the year
65,921
$ 38,854 $ 65,921
The accompanying notes to the financial statements
are an integral part of this statement.
.
56,260
19,644
100
76,004
21,785
174
19,092
34,473
75,524
480
5,158
5,638
60,283
,L'/{ '.
o
o
~ I
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
(A Minnesota Governmental Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 AND 1980
1981 1980
Revenue (Note 1):
Property tax levies
Homestead tax credit subsidy
Ditch maintenance levies
Permit income
$ 65,676 $
27,411
130
Total revenue
93,217
Expenditures:
General and administrative expenses
Project expenditures:
Hydrologic study
Creek maintenance
Engineering
16,787
45,000
11,985
13,865
Total expenditures
87,637
Excess (deficiency) of operating revenue
over expenditures
5,580
4,739
10,319
38,854
Interest income
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance
Fund balance at beginning of the year
Fund balance at end of the year
53,042
25,420
7
210
. 78,679
22,075
67,142
25,057
114,274
(35,595)
8,528
(27,067)
65,921
$ 49,173 $ 38,854
The accompanying notes to the financial statements are an
integral part of this statement.
~~t
o
o
, .
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
(A Minnesota Governmental Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1982 AND 1981
1982
Revenue (Note 1):
Property tax levies
Homestead tax credit subsidy
Permit income
$ 104,449 $
24,610
130
Total revenue
129,189
Expenditures:
General and administrative
Project expenditures:
Professional services
Creek maintenance
Engineering
43,174
54,732
53,984
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of operating revenue
over expenditures
151,890
Interest income
(22,701)
7,603
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance
(15,098)
Fund balance at beginning of the year
49,173
$ 34,075 $ 49,173
Fund balance at end of the year
"
1981
65,676
27,411
130
93,217
16,787
45,000
11,985
13,865
87,637
5,580
4,739
10,319
38,854
The accompanying notes to the financial statements are an
integral part of this statement.
.
_ "1--\
o
o
. .
. .
. .
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
(A Minnesota Governmental' Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
CONSOLIDATION OF ALL FUNDS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1983 AND 1982
Revenue (Note 1):
Property tax levies
Homestead tax credit
Permit income
Insurance levy
Total revenue
Expenditures:
Audit
Engineering
Insurance
Managers fees
Administrative & accounting
. Legal
Clerical
Dues, memberships, subscriptions
Office supplies
Interest
Publication
Purchased services
Surety .bond
Seminars & meetings
Engineering supplies
Appraisal
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of operating revenue
over expenditures
Interest income.
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance
Fund balance at beginning of the year
Fund balance at end of the year
1983' 1982
$ 184,350
34,533
390
3,446
222,719
994
147,924
2,700
6,947
20,682
6,570
3,242
275
2,404
1,879
209
30,153
239
2,494
3,817
230,529
(7,810)
2,021
(5,789)
34.075
$ 104,449
24,610
130
129.189
910
53,984
2,831
6,059
14,187
5,680
3,323
568
584
1,683
2,907
54,732
392
4.050
151,890
(22,701)
7,603
(15,098)
49,173
$ 28.286 $ 35,075
The accompanying notes to the financial statements are an
integral part of this statement.
. .
I, . ' L.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
A Minnesota Governmental Agency)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
CONSOLIDATION OF ALL FUNDS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31. 1984 AND 1983
1984
Revenue (Note 1 ):
Property tax levies
Permit income
In.urance levy
Ponding fee collections
$ 304,364
490
3,435
21.908
Total revenue
330,197
Expenditures:
Audit
Engineering
Insurance
),Ianagers fee
Administration & accounting
Legal
Clerical
Duesl membershjp, subscriptions
Office liupplie.
Interest
Publication
Purchased services
Surety bond.
Seminars & meetings
Engineering liupplies
Appraisal
Printing
Data processfng
Bond ilisue costs
1,019
209,20B
21490
11,541
421856
91545
6,214
237
4,058
301740
121609
4501114
239
551
20,287
17,885
434
5,394
10.090
835.511
<505,314 >
9.234
<496,080>
<119,412>
212,043
14.412
<389,046>
28.286
-<3601760>
fotal expenditures
Deficiency of operating revenue
over expenditures
Interut income
Decrealie in fund balance
Prior period adjustment
R.Ii.rve for encumbraDceli
Repair fund balance
N.t decrealie in fund balance
fund balance at beginning of year
fund balance at end of year (Note 6)
1983
$ 218,883
390
31446
222.719
994
~47,924
21700
61947
201682
61570
3,242
275
2,404
11879
209
30,153
239
21494
3,817 .
230.529
<7,810>
2.021
<5,789>
. <51789>
34.075
- 28,286
.=a~=c=z= -===...sc
fhe accompanying noteli to the financial statementli are an
integral part of thili statement.
..
.,'
o
COON CREEX V1ATERSHED DIS'l'RICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
JANUARY 25. 1988
pd
11 15.12 ---
3,190.00 ......
67.00 --
705.74 --
396.88 --
1. Anoka County Union & Shopper, Inc.
- Notices
2. l1alamen ilirdens
- Ditch 58
3. Mick's Printing
-' Envelopes, ink
4. l1el Schulte
- 4th Quarter Hanager's Per Diem
5. Paul \<lilliams
- 4th Quarter l'lanager's Per Diem
6. Willis Peterson
- 4th Quarter Hanager's Per Diem
250.00 --
7. A.M. Sannerud & Associates, P.A.
3,595.20 ,...,..
Gen'l =
D-41 =
D-44 =
D-57 =
D-58 =
D-59 =
Acct/Adr.1.
2,462.25
185.00
; 9.50
542.25
293.25
9.50
Clerical
10.00
25.00
Office
54.70 = 2,526.95
3.75 = 213.75
= 9.50
542.25
293.25
9.50
8. Olson; GUhrt & Seran, Ltd.
- Legal, Services
2,229.80
.......
9. Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See Engineering Agenda
5,382.84 --
L ,ii ,',/1 L ~ '''' (} 0
~. --- q(..;;; tl-II ~O
Fi/,ICI!p,r/<ltIC' 5) 3'62. b 4-
D .3;,)qs-.'<:>
FleeT, '-I I~ 0)11.
171 A t>/ J!.& n> '", , / ..::, S :2.., G 2.
(J tTc./-t- /) 1C,(gll1b - .3 /9 0, () D
/J/L ot(lw. E-il'r;I-.W' - $5?..... / ~
o 1<:,r /J L IJ is; g-; J.. :5 Z--
/5") C;; 3 ;z..sg
-r-6TA-l.. is-NIJ{jI'~S#l/(;3/ 97t1-.It.f-
~.:BOIVD PAYfl1IT5. - / 3 I I 30 I .q:J
tPSC/?oW ~fFOt/'lJJ-;5 - .3 I 8L/.s-', I q
-r::-rA-L E '1 pEN~.!j 3;z crJ 4;) 7. / 1
. -
,
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BIL~STP\BE PAID
. '-':'-(.:
,','
FEBRUARY22~ 1988
. ;:. ~;>":,...";'
, '".-'
1. Burtc,n Kr'aabel Cc.nst., .IYlc. ';.- O.i tch 41-8
2. Land Title, Inc. -. Refund on Ditch 41 lien
3. Land Title, Inc. - Refund on Ditch 41 lien
4. Anoka Co. Union &. Shopper, Inc. - Notice
5. Olson, G~mn and Seran, .Ltd. - Legal Services
6. A.M. Sannerud & As~oc., P.A~
Acct. &. Adm.
Acct/Adrn. Clerical
Gen'l = $3,163.72 25.00
0-41 = 447.00
0-54 = 21.75
0-57 = 220.50
0-58 = 861.00
, .. .
'0-59 = 31.75 ":. ..
0-50 = 43.50
e 509 = 21.75
. Office
163.61
44.40
7. Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
8.
Anoka Co. Recorder - Release filings
Oitch 58
50.00 --
9. Anoka County Treasurer - Property owner list
Lr~(1AL
3;(P53 J')
/ / } ;. 7 ',r.. J.. 'i1 '
S-/ 6'13, r<i?
5/'-1 (J, 1 N P €-I21 Y(.
ACe? 00,/. AO)?'I, -'
/l/!)fIJ!J(Q C:/~S.
(] rT cl-l IJ (~ 41 "Ie.
lilt.. tJ7/J,,/~ ~"I..'p
4. 9 0 00
&,S5'2)
-rl A "I--"l;"~". '~; ;
1"-
. 16TPL
.' .
f>
0,."..1..
.... .~t .
liUl"i!:P$IIF; Ii !.;! I g; T n ~~ I -
!- ..
?d. ....
$ 4'30.00 -
57.37
2.82 r-
15.12 --
3,653.35 -
5,043.98 ...-
$3,352.33
447.00
21.75
220.50
905.40
31.75
43.50
21 . 75
11,278.28 ...-
560.00
--
;). r) / ~o .12-.
'J''''
. :>',i.
',1', .
. ",,'
']if~~'t:'ii
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
McH'ch 28, 198fl.
1.
Doris Irvine - Ditch
C'-
.JI
.-,
c...
The Allen Company, Realtors - Ditch 57
.,.
~.
Kenneth Slyzuk
- 4th Quarter Manager's Per Diem
4.
Business Agency, Inc. - General Liability Insurance
5.
Business Agency, Inc. - Workers Compensation Policy
. 5.
Anoka County Treasurer - Property owne~ lists
7.
Anoka County Surveyor - Maps of Ditch 58
8.
Government Finance Officers Association
- book on governmental accounting
9.
A.M. Sannerud & Associates, P.A.
I
Acct /Adr,l. Cle~'ical Office
Gen' 1 = 4,255.75 31. 50 131.35 $ 4,429.50
0-41 = 481.75 481.75
D-57 = 502.25 502.25
0-58 = 429.00 1. 55 430.55
D-50 = 29.00 .90 29.90
509 = 421.83 Lt21.83
10.
Olson, Gunn and Seran, Ltd. - legal services
o
11.
& Ass.:,c.
Israelson, Reese, Ellingson
See Engineering Agenda
I 'J..4r,,S'4
I
/Q)Q4'L.02
l(j).. C; 5 ,1'6
~) J (r . 3 J
0'--
--- ...':1. 'l5 ~l, .-!;.2-
.., ') C,eCl <17
L,z G p.(...
0/'{(.III,;.f,:lll).f("
II C-c--r- "-I A 0 >>-t.
rJJ/)I--I)\ CJ ,-n <;
o ITc-tl !JI(, ~~'"
.J) L t cn-Il,!:,> ,::,1'
-tt- I .,.... /1 J
(JJ
$
712.50 ,...
559.00 --
516.33--
2,137.00 -
1 , 301 . oel --
100.00 -
9.50"'--
37. 00 --
5,295.98 --
1, 2L18. 54 ./
19,942.02./
3:212521~7
/-,
(J)
"
, .
o
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
Apt'i I 11. 1988
1. Olson, Gunn and Seran, Ltd. - Legal services
2. A. M. Sannet'ud & Ass.:>ci at es, P. A.
Acct /Adm. Clet'ical Office
Ger.' I = $1,924.33 79.75
0-41 = 375.25 .90
0-57 = 87.25 .45
0-58 = .288.25 2.40
0-60 = 58.00 2.10
509 = 126.50 10.20
3. Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See Engineering Agenda
LJf:(PAc. /)(j~9.1.5'
C-/,-(G, I ).( ISF'I'LI J.I s:-' Lf / / c; 5-, 7 (
/~cG(- d A OJh ;:z I q ..5-5- 3 <?
tJ-J Jl ',1 /1 ~ EA..,!,
o(rc/~ IJ(G~/.N~
I) l.. {~ err 1-1 {,no IF: -( e
- C)
...- C'-~-
.,.- () -.-.-.,..,
.-
16T~L
g/ '140,;;''--1
Total
$2,0(14,-'08
376. 15 .
87.70
290.65
60. 10
136.70
(Jd
$1,089.15 ----
"" 9...... ""'8 r
L.., o.JW.<eJ
4,195.71./
g / ;2UU ?--If-
ff
(j)
"
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
ApY'i I 25. 1988
1. Mel Schulte - 1st Quarter Manager's Per Diem
2. Williw Peterson - 1st Quarter Manager's Per
Dierol
w. Ken Slyzuk - 1st Quarter Manager's Per Diem
5. Malarner. Gardens - Ditch 58-7
4. Paul Williams - 1st Quarter Manager's Per Diem
6.
A.M. Sannerud & ASSOCiates, .P.A.
Acct/Adrn. Clerical Office
= $1,314.75 47.70
Gen' I
0-41
0-54
0-57
0-58
0-23
= 351.25
= 148.00
= 150.75
= 166.00
= 29.00
= 7 -:;'C:-
. "'....
= 1 , 192.00
2.85
8.10
7. Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See Engineering Agenda
L~r;,/l-L
(5A/ blIH:: /;:'12..1 N (j,
Accr ...j..ADJh
(lJ Jj IV jJc.. ~/z. S
I) / i C(~ JJ/r; ~ wc,
Au...... 61'/1 f/2.. B:. y,;
-0-'
Lj)(polp.3t.f
.3) '-1-5 'is ,75
'17?> ,3.5
II SCJS.OC>
-
0-
r--j6TF\L
/ 6) L( 3 '{ . L/-tJ r
o
Total
1, 362..45
351.25
148.00
153.60
174.10
29.00
7 -:;'c-
. "'-oJ
1,233.10
,Pc1I-
$ 206.75 -
158.10 -
205.75
205.75 .-
1,595.00 --
3,458.75 --
4,606.34 --
IS Lf]8,4'1-
'w
'A.M. Sannerud & Associates)
Acct/Adfll. Clerical
Gen'l = $2,008.25
0-41 = 251.00
D-54 = 87.00
. D-57 = 21.75
0-58 = 199.00
0-44 = 43.50
509 = 7.25
13.
i-
./ L)
LIz... (" fl- L
E. J" 4> /J..J f:lZ..P- I .N c..
/~ c q <>l /l OYl--t
. (l'1J1rII-\CPI-;/L..$,
o D\1,(.../.1 Ot(o(;,/)..t(p
11 LL 0" (.( /;:IJ-[JVP
~ -
/6"Tf\L /:: ,,-P1F.,r:>
/30/,/I) pAy Yl1 ~^,TS
7u7))\ ~ () yPI.~. '/:>' 1 BdJJO$
o
1.
.=-
. .....
3.
4.
! =
.J.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
,,11.
12.
COON CREEK WATE~SHEO DISTRJCT
BILLSTO~~E PAID
Pd-
Mick's Printing - .Office suppli~s
$ 59.00---
Anoka County Treasurer - Ditch .60 printouts
5(1.00 ....
Minnesota' Association of Water?hed Districts - Dues
570.00 -
Business flgency - "Contin~lous Bond" pt-emi~Utl
239. 00 ..-
Anoka County Treasurer -General Obligation Bond 1984B
--
10,649.99
Anoka County Treasurer - General Obligation Bond 1985A
15,000.36 -.
Gary Beck - 1st Quarter Managers'
105.40
--
Pet-Diem
RSI ~ MSA 509 binders
394.00 .--
P.A. - Acct/Adm.
Office Total
$ 66.93 $2,075.18
2.70 263.70
2.85 89.85
.90 22~65
2,714.78 ---
3.00
202. ()O
43.50
17.90
10.65
Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See Engineering Agenda
Malamen Gardens - Ditch 41-8
3,357.02 ,-:-
1,182.50 ....-
~lamen Gardens Ditch 58
,-
, ~91.50
a. L5e.~/.!,e.CA. N/II a}- SE..RA^I J L-rt;) .
Ls:(OA(' Se~vlt:.tJ:s.' /.:8:8./1,:-a<J
;...".... .', '. .
I ,"6'BC].'J..9
31 ']57.o'J..
a, '7) If . n
10'5 .4 C>
IIZ/If,oc'
I .3? )., ,oe..'
--/6' J 7 &/i-:4-9
;) s-, r:oso. 35;
-3 b) 4- I)... g Lj.
"'7
, ....
~
.. :,
--'"
.3 c;, I 4 11-, s.L/.
o
1. Malamen Gardens
2.
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
May 23. 1988
Malamen Gardens - Ditch 58-5
Ditch 41-8
~. Rick Johnsqn - Ditch inspection
4. Rnoka County Treasurer - Ditch 50 printouts
5. R. M.
Sanner'.ld &
Rcct/Adm.
$2,230.54
242.50
585.5CJ
137.75
2211_ 50
14.50
157.50
I
Gen' 1 =
D-41
0-54
0-57
D'-58
D-20
509
Ass,;:.c i at es, . P. A.
Clet'ical
$ 10.50
Office
$ 130.61
3.00
2.40
13.80
1.35
4.95
6.
Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See Engineering Rgenda
L,z: <:P ILC ~-
12: /'Iu l).Iff F:rL II'"
// G c..,. -J A () n--..
r"I)-l N 1\ u.r ILS.
n (jc 1-1 OIGroIN'" ___
Ilu- vll/~-f1. fi-YPel'o
TDTPL
- c-
3; ~89.'g1.
~.) (') G 5- () r,
-' ~ () .
1
- 0-
~} Co q S'. () ()
454 . '7 9,
..~ ----~._.,.-_.~....
....,
/ (); 70 L/ . Cp cr
o
Other
$108.59
f~-
$ 2, 172.50 --
522.50
-
385.78 --
68.00 --
3,855.09 -
3,589. 82 -~
/ 0) 7 oL/. fo q
o
COON CREEK WRTERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PRID
June 13. 1988
fd-
1.
Tf'easLlt'er, Rne,ka CO~lYIty - Ditch 57 Redetet'f.lination I:.f
Benefits
$ 2,311. 75 .-
~2. Burton Kraabel Canst., Inc.
3. Burton Kraabel Const., Inc.
4. MalaMen Gardens - Ditch 58-2
5. City of Blaine - Ditch 41
5.
Olson, Gunn and Seran, Ltd.
7.
R.M.
Gen'l =
D-20
D-41
D-54
D-57
D-58
D-60
509
Sannet'~ld &
Rcct /RdM.
$4,917.08
447.00
51 L 75
108.75
242.50
1, 140.05
Rssl:lciates. ,
Clef'ical
$ 225.75
Ditch 58-7-2
905.25 --
10.50
68.25
Ditch 41-8
532.50
1, 292. 50 ..-
108.00 ..-
Legal Services
4,943.28 -
P.R.
Office
$169.90
8,922.88'-
9.15
1.20
8.40
29.40
.60
8.B5
TCltal
$5,312.73
447.00
531.40
109.95
250.90
1,237.70
.60
1,032.60
1,023.75
\..
Israelson, Reese, Ellingson &
_ See Engineering Rgenda
L6. ~ A- L
P.N Glrlli E-R I f\I G:
(\CCf. <>l- A P 171. -----
In Af\.IA Qrt:..fL5.
OlTc.I4 OICo &Il,rr.
ALL 6'NJEfI.. Eypf;;J.IV
B.
T OT/2\ L
o
L/-I QL/3.?l?
~) 4 7'-1. :)/
%' I C} "n. . 'i?~
-0-
d... . 139. ).. '5
~ 3/1. '75
1
:J. 7 I 5'"'1 J .Cr7
Assclc.
8,474.51 ...-'
?- 7 J S1 .I , ~ 7
~
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
June 27. 1'388
1. Anoka Appraisal Services
- Redetermination of Benefits - Ditch 57
~ A. M. Sal"lYoerud & Asse.ciates, P.A.
1;;..
Acct/Adm. C let' i ca I Office
Gen'l = $3,'323.05 $173.25 $120.36
D-20 50.75 1.65
D-41 20'3.50 3.15
D-44 58.00
D-54 152.25 3.75
D-57 100. 13 5.40
D-58 274.75 .-> '3.50
D-60 43.50 3.60
50'3 2'3.00 5.85
..,
.....
Israelson, Reese, Ellingson &.Assoc.
- See Engineering Agenda
Lrz-<1AL
~N('p;,,( f..k~(21)'" '" --
/.\c.U" ~O YI'\
(Y1 (,-1'/ I'l Ca fU/. S
() ITc.. (~ Dlr:.,relN y.
!hL Olll-/;;'(L EYfJtUl.lI:J...__
'-r-;-) T'I) L- .
o
- 0-"
Lf; j '19. <is 1-
5"1 I Co 7.5'S'
- C-l"-
-- 0'-
105-, C/O
q /4'72.37
T c.t a I
$4,216.67
52.40
212.65
58.00
156.00
105.53
284.35
47.10
34.85
peL -
$
105.00 ---
---
5,167.55
/'
4,1'39.82
o . L/ 1 'J... ,3 7
) .
7
o
1.
2.
3.
4.
r:
..J.
," 5.
7.
8.
Gen' I
0-41
0-54
0-57
0-58
0-59
509
9.
LI-;Co I'J.... L
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
ul< L- Y/' II, I (tfj 8
F.N. Shaffer - M.q. Watson -
~edetermination of Benefits ~Oitch 57
The Allen Company \
Redeter~ination of Benefits - Ditch 57
,
Burton Kr?abel Const., Inc.
Bank Leveling - Ditch 58
Burton Kraabel Const., Inc. - Ditch 58-2
Paul Williams - 2nd Quarter Managers per Diem
~~~
Behun & Peterson Realty Co.
Refund of Erosion Escrow for Donald Peterson
Bonine Excavating, Inc.
A.M. Sannerud & Associates,
Acct/Adm. Clerical
= $ 3,243.50 $ 551.25
.384.25
101. 50
29.00
883.00
14.50
14.50
P. A.
Office
$183.45
.' 9.95
5.15
.2.28
21.00
7.05
3.60
Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See Engineering Agenda
l~nG. I fl fr IZ 0_ /;.1 (,. --
p, (<:-1 "'-( A 0 n, __.___
;I) 1\ N Il U 02... S
\') de I~ U,~ ~IAJ~
flL(.. -o1'/4,l.-/2. 1=-'1,)1: NO
-To", A L
o
-0-
5) (.,01,67
5 1453.<=19
I ) 1. 'I I . 8 \?
31 o<;>:t...~5'
I ) 60 Ie ,OG
/ to ) 355.0'21
Tc,tal
$3,978.20
394.21
106.55
31.28
911. 05
18. 10
14.50
peL -
$ . 600.00 --
406.00 ,-
1,750.00 /'
8'33.75 ,.....-
1, 211. 88 ...-
.~ -J((
(500. 00 I t'c!
'--.
428.50 ...--
5,453. '39 --
5,501. 0'3 -
/ ~ ) 3 jS-, 1)../
g
o
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
(JULy 0l..G>1 1998
1. Business Agency - Buffer Liability
2. Mel Schulte - 2nd Quarter Manager's Per Diem
3. Willis PetErson - 2nd Quarter Manager's Per Diem
5.
A. M.
4. Olson, Gunn & Seran, Ltd. - Legal services
Sannerud & Associates, P.A.
Acct/Adm. Clerical
= $ 4,549.62 $ 152.25
217.50
Gen' I
0-41
0-44
D-54
0-57
0-58
D-59
0-60
509
65.25
54.00
140.25
650.50
36.25
29.00
396.50
51. 00
Office Total
$223.67 $4,925.54
5.73 223.23
3.90 69.15
1.65 55.65
27.23 167.48
29.75 731.25
5.40 41. 65
3.45 32.45
9.45 405.95
6. Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See Engineering Agenda .
Lr=(;AL
--_.--
,
r=-f'/ c:3 "" E E:R IN G;' --.--
A' (.G-I,.. -\;- A 0 m '---'-
(Yl Ii TV A G fi.R. $ -----
\') lTd-l (j,(P(PllvC. .--
ALL. 0,1-1(;:(..'_ 6. yp"'NI:'
314-3/./),
(p ) 4-/q ,'/1-
(p ) iP5'..l,3S
I ) R 'OJ....1t.f
-.0-
.:JCe Ob
t>J -
$ 36.00
861.52
421.42
3,431.12 --
6,652.35 --
6,419.12 -
11) ~}-/. 53
IoTA L. 1__- /7) ~ ~).53'
10
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
A'.lg'.ISt 8,.1988
pel ,-
1. Ken Slyzuk .- 2nd Quarter Manager's Per DieM
$
811. 88 -
~. Kottkes' Bus Service, Inc. - District Tour
85.00 -
w. Anoka County Union and Shopper - District Tour Notice
37.20 ,.,.
4. Mick's Printing - Stationery and" Inquiry/Response ForMS
132. 5C) -
5. BI.l'l'''tclrl Kt~aabel CCIY'lst., !"('IC.
Ditch 41-8A
275. 00 ,.-
6. Burton Kraabel Const., Inc.
Ditch 41-8
247.50 -
7.
A.M.
Sannerud & Associates, P.A.
Acct/AdM. Clet'ical
$ 1,459.50 $ 288.75
646.25
7.25
152.25
108.75
- Adr.lin. /Acct.
Office Total
$ 53.26 $1,801.51
8.22 654.47
3, 4(1(f. 39 ,-
Gen' 1 =
0-41 =
0-44 =
0-54 =
0-57 =
0-58 =
0-5'3 =
0-60 =
50'3 =
7 '::''''
. ~.../
2.53
154.88
115.75
314.64
44.10
298.25
15.75
7.00
.64
1.35
42.75
2'3.00
273.93
2.55
2.25
31.55
276.24
8.
Israelson, 'Reese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See Engineering Agenda
2,963.31 ,--
LEGA L
EN G II-J{,:"F.:.. R. I f\I Go _~
A c..c..T el-- A [:) /v\. ____
(VI A /'1 I' & G. R S. _~__
I:J iTc..I!. 01 Co("INC, -,--
ALL. uTl-fEr< l=-ypl:/-II.)__
,
~d-
~ 1 q Co 3. 3 J
.3,4oo.:Yl
8IJ,'3g
S~;t .50
<< 54: .70
fJ) q 5'2 .78
'/-OTAt.
7 J q5a ,'18
o
7
F1
o
o
COON CREEK'WRTERSHED DISTRCT
. BILLS TO'~E PRID ,
A .uG (,t 'i r,!;' <<. ;1.,', 19? 'l"
. .'
Gunn'and Seran, Ltd~ ~Legal services
Sannerud & Rssociates,P.~.
Rcct/8dm. Clerical
$ 2,028.50 . $ 15.75
811. 75
1.
""7
o I son,
-:>
.....
A. M.
Gen' I =
D-41 =
D-44 =
D-54 =
D-57 =
D-58 =
DL59 =
D-60 =
509 =
7 .-.=
. L:...J
572.75
108.00
127.50
50.00
43.50
7.25
Office
. $ 70.60
28.15
.75
4.55
1.80
13.45
1. 75
3.55.
3. Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Rssoc.
'LEG A L
(E.t't C':, f N e: 6. Po. I AI G
I~ ~CI, =l- A [) fY1 __
fV) ii NAG E. R <; .-...._
\') ITc,I.' I') 'u t, IN Go -_
ALL 61-/i fi. R 'E'It)/': 1'1) -_.
TorA L
!
3) 4.3'7.4L/-
2 ) q 5(P .,50
3) g '1(P 1~.5'
-- C) -
<-,-_ 0
- ()
'U.
_.~""w
jOj aCfo.79
Tc.tal
$ 2, 114.85
839.90
. ' '8.00
577.30
109,'80
140.95
51. 75
47.05
I 7.25
Pel ~
$ 3,437.44 --"
3,896.85 --
2, 956.5() --
10):(96.'79
,:;.' ",.' .. ,
",,~':Y~l!;}i.j,:..t.,., '.
".., ..... ". '..1.., .q....' . .
' .""'...' .;:'.' ~! ~ ~.:: ..!....~' ~', " .
".' . . . '." '~"" :: " "
o
'0
COON CREEK WRTERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
.-,
c..
1. Gary Beck - 2nd Quarter Manager's Per DieM
\ .
DepartMent of Natural Resources -
perMit application for unnaMed wetland #2-400W
ffJ-i
$
657. 00 -
74. 26 ~
." A.M. Sannerud & Rssociates, .P.A. 7,514.63 -
w.
Acct / AdM i y, Clet'ical 'Office Total
Ger,' I = $ 4,934.00 $ 351.75 $ 93.08 $5,378.83
0-41 489.00 10.79 499.79
D-44 - 31. 50 5.25 36.75
0-54 87.00 3.90 90.90
0-57 309.25 10.15 319.40
0-58 994.56 12.65 : I, 007. 21
D-59 58.00 4.80 62.80
0-60 79.00 8.45 87.45
509 31.50 31.50
4. I st'ae,l se.n, Reese, Ell i YJgsc.n 5,121.51 -
& Asse,c.
LILGA-L
/i.N GII" (l. Ii.. A. IN G
A C.cr, <+ A 0 (V) -:---'--,.
P11~/I-' /~ Ct Sf? ~ ----
P ITc.-H I:JICJ~/N(P -..-
A LL 6T}../ IiR fi. i r) /; i-I (.! -
-0 "--
5-) 1a./,5"1
r7 I !Slt./. 0>3
0.57.00
_0-
1tf. ~p
I orA L
/3) 34>7.'-1-0
/3) 3~7.'..tb
,
.,:.,"
Ie
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAlO
SEPTEMBER 26, 1988
pel --
1. Lake Restoration - Ditch spraying
\ ~<.
I:) 1=-I.-IiIP-O ---.. - $ 7,860. Oo.)p p,\
--
-_._---~
2. Advantage Rdvertising & Graphic Serv., Inc.
Printing of MSA 509 reports
1, 245. 50 /'
3. Minnesota State Auditor
Audit work through 9/13/88
2,908.08 --
4. E~gene A. Hickok & Associates - Engineering
722.19 .-
5. ,'Ols':.n, G'.mn & Set'an, Ltd. - Legal set'vices
1,992.49 .-
6. A.M. Sannerud & Associates, P.A. - General fund
Admini's~rative = $ 2,325.33
Accounting = 740.75
Audit- = 265.25
Clerical = 126.25
Office Expense = 86.55
3,544.13/'
7. A. M. Sannet'l.ld & AssQciates, P. A. - Pt'c..j ect s 533.05 ..
o itch 41 - Reg. . = $ 78.15
D itch it! - Spec. = 1 (I 1. 75
o itch 54 - Reg. = 44.20
Ditch 57 - Reg. = 137.75
o itch 57 - Spec. = 7.25
Oi tch 58 - Reg. = 86.35
. D itch 58 - Spec. = 53.50
Ditch 59 - Reg. = 9.60
Ditch 60 - Spec. = 14.50
7.
IsraelsQn, Reese, EllingsQn & RSSQc.
- See engineering agenda'
4,648.56 -
L6C,A-L ____
e: 1'., (? I tl F.. E- R. ) 1" G ... _._..___
A c. c_ 0]-, c:\-" 1-\ 0 rv!. ._ -..-...--....
(1-'1/\ J,I /1 (, rU2 (; -..,..' , ___......_
rJ IT c II I:) 1(, ~ IN 6. ,-_.......
1\ Lt. CJ"UI J;, R. 6 'f, P :.: /,/ /) --_
1199'J...4-9
5}37o.75
4- J 0 t7'l./~
- () ~-
/5; 59 4-.00
-0--
'-I I /53. si
. ,
o
--1'-0 'r-- A L
/ S) S-q 4 ,0 0
. to..
, ,
.'1:
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS To~BEPAID
OCTOBER 10, 1988
1. Lake Restoration - Ditch spraying
2. Rick Johnson - Ditch inspection
3. Anoka County Union & Shopper, Inc.
- Public~tion of 1989 budget
4. Mick's Pt'inting - Mailir,g labels
5. Olson, Gunn & Seran, Ltd. - Legal services
&.I..J.~,I...."r:
6. A.M. Sannerud & Associates, P.A. - General fund
Administrative = $ 1,357.84
Accounting = 597.50
Audit = 286.00
Clerical = 52.50
pd
-
/.., -.......---'.- -(
~~.~~~~J) fJ
385. 78 .-
71'>.26 ,;"
30.00 "..
7,015.2S.";
.-, .-.."..:. 8lt "..
.::., .::. ;::1":'.
..""
2,089.75
7.
A. M.
Sanneruc & Associates,
Reg.
P. A. _/>Pt'c..jects.
Spec.::,; ofc. . Exp.
$ 1046.56 $ '2.75
. , . .', ',', '.
4.20'
Di tch
D itch
D itch
Ditch
41 - $
210.25
72.50
79.75
116.00
52~.~'-,.25
54
57 -
58 -
"/. ",-
: 14~,50
8.
Israelson, Rese, Ellingson & Assoc.
- See en~ineering agenda
LEG A L ~---_.---
6. ;V G / /'-/ 6 E. f? /1" G -------
A GGT. <:.(--- A 0 J11 -------
(Vl ;-1/\/ f) Co G t2 S ---.---------
o rr c. 1-1 (J I G (p 1/'''0 ..' ..--.
ALL 07'/( [:"-/2 1.:;-'1.' )/:-",,\//_1
.r-; )0 ($. ~S"
(p/ 5:4;), , 7 7
4. : 3 ()':3 . 51
I ..0.
. ',' ,.,"lr,,:.
0--
~:o .-.,.;--
'41.'~ ,6 tf
,..':.'
'(,.::'
o
ToTp.. L...
I g) L/ ,'8 3
4.85
. 13.20:,
~
(pry .'
6, 542. 77 /
19J/;fl~ 3 ~(q5'
. .
..
<it
~ )
o
COON CREEK WATE8SHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
OCTOBER Z4, 1988
. .
1. Treasurer, Anoka County - Printouts for
Ditche~.II, 39, 44 and GO ~
2.
Mel Schulte - 3rd Quarter, Manager's Per Diem
~. Willis Peterson
3t'd Q..lat',tet'Managet" s Pet' Dier,!
4. Paul Williams - 3rdQuarter Man.ger's Per ~iem
5. Minnesota State Auditor - Auditing ~hrough 10/11/88
5.
Eugene A. Hickok & Assoc. - Engineering (509)
7.
ASSC'C., P. A. -
= $ 1,506.71
= 285.75
= 550.00
= 73.50
Genera 1 F..trId
A.I'1. Sannet'ud &
Administrative
Account i 1'Ig
Aud.i t
Clet'ical
,
8. A. M. Sannet'~ld & Assc'c. , P. A. - Pt'co.j ect s
Reg. Spec. Ofc. Exp.
Ditch 41 = $ 174.00 241.27 2.50
D itch 44 = 14.50 52.50
D itch 54 = 36.25 907.25 .6.25
Ditch 57 = 17.75 4.05
Ditch 58 = 130.50 167.75 .80
~ ,
, .',
9. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - MSA 509
Billing period ending 10/2i/88.=$2,OG3.2G
Billing period ending 10/j/88~'= 1,150~08
Billing period ending 9/23/88 ,= 2,349.80
10.
ISt'aels.:on, Reese, Ellir,gs.:on & Assc.c.
,
- See engineering agenda ~ ,
Refur,d cof Escro;:ow
1.
Do;:onald Peterson - See inspection repo;:ort dated 10/8/88
LEGAL
6 N C.//Y/S t::.. R. J N(, ...-
Ii c c.-r "'i- A D (f1 __.~.. _____.~
(VI Ii fI. ( A u I~ 12 S --...... ----
O? lie.. /-I IJ ,e, t, 0'../ Go ~--"-''''
A 4-. orf.l I=- f2. G:y /J 1.."1/) _
lCJT/~ L
0-
-
7) S-g 1....?-. 7
ot 1'3 '-Il.( .47
/lq4'J....3S"
-0-
3}5""/~ ,'11
~ J , g <35'. ~ I
R - - "( ~ 00 C/o
I; Ful"< ) P€,€'ptc.;." ~S.CI<() W .;:)
-tr'T./~c... ( E-I(JI:~^,I)"T-{.n(;5.. \';) 3 ?,~S-, 8/--
I v . <:/-- F- r c. {J (1\,-" Rb (-vNI] ) \ J......
peL
$
312.00 -
797.00 '"
421. GO"'"
723. 75 ~
3,204.72
888.22
2, 525.96 ...-
1, 755. 37 ..-
.'
5,563. 14 -'
.
,
6,694.05 --
. ;
""I'
500. 00 -
;<3J385"',2>1
'5.S.
,I
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
November 14, 1988
t. Gary Beck - 3rd quarter managers' per diem
2. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - Acct/Admin
Ger,eral Fund
Administration = $ 3,556.17
Accounting = 397.50
Audit = 523.50
Clerical = 63.00
3. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - Acct/Admin
Projects
Reg.
o itch 41 = $ 24'3.75
D itch 54 = 86.25
Ditch 57 = 39.50
D itch 58 = 1'37.50
Spec.
$ 72.50
Ofc. Exp.
$ 11.25
26.20
105.00
3.75
.
4. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - Acct/Admin
MSA 509
Refund of Escrow
1. R & B Invest~ents - Creekhaven
Partial refund - see 10/24/88 minutes
L 6- Ce I~ L-
--'--".~
-C)-
I=- N bIlVtZ:IiI2./IV G ..-.--.-
A c.cT. c!- A 0 n~ -.--...
n'l/' 1\/ A G f? R. .5:
OJlc.1-I OIG~/NG,
;'.::1, 1...1.... oTlln<. I~ 'I.') .t.:' If 0.-
-r~Crr I~ L
-0'-
&} 3 00 . 36
3 ~~ :16
-0-
-c,....-
_"_.__.._0-
(2) & ~Ce . 50
~L/'5.()O
R TiFv;..fl:) CR.e:likJ.ll'//fN E"CRor.J .?. I
--
0-0 ~ (i'i:-,LPI.;'/,I/;ITU"/::::, \ 0/) 43/. s-o
( 6 (liL -/_ r;;.r-C/J,r..-tc) Rtr pC//'ln)
f 11 ~ . ~:!! l: r: \','. " ~ ~. ~:) i .' ~ i . .
L:.,I I ,"', 'I"n l:l: (.,',} n
e=, -
$
386. 20 -
4, 540. 1 7 ~
731. 70-
1,028. 43 -
2,745. 00 ~
9) 43 ( . 5"6
L/- .X
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
November 21, 1988
(->d -
1. Ken Slyzuk - 3rd Quarter Manager's Per Diem
$
503.18 -
2. Olson, GunM & Seran, Ltd. - Legal services
5,166.90 -
3. Anoka County Treasurer
PC Analysis 0-57 and 0-59
271.00 -
4. Anoka County Treasurer - General Obligation Bond 1984B
60,651.2~ .-
5. Anoka County Treasurer - General Obligation Bond 1985A
45,000.36 -
6.
Israelson, Reese, Ellingson & Assoc., Inc. ~(~
- Eng i neE~r i ng
11,130.28 .-
7. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - Acct./Adm.
General Fund
2,240.53 .-
8. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - Acct./Adm.
Projects .
129.54 ---
9. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. Acct./Adm.
MSA 509
38.75
. L,-;; GilL
r3- N G 1/'.(!7 r-:.. R../ N (J --
A c c.T ~ A- 0 J11 ' -:...--..-.
(}1 J.) ^/ A G l'if2 S .--------
J) IT e-Ii 0 I G, r;. I ;-.1 (;, -...-----
AI-L OTlI f:/2 fE'I (J1l.M I),
5, 1 f.p{p',C;o
/IJ/30.).2
~ I 46CJ . g 2.
S-O:5 . I g
/ ') 5') / '3 / . 7 g
_0-
~ "7 J .06
101ft L
/ q .) 4. f6.0 " .I ~ '
! 0 ~J (P5/.(,6
f3 0/"/ n I? A Y /11/;: NT.s
~67H L /E'fPE.A(/J {Tu/u.s.L- \
g -~8a"'/.J p/lY frJIi.....,TS)
/;).5) /3/,7fJ
~Jj.
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
December 12, 1988
1. Anoka County Union & Shopper, Inc. - notice
2. Minnesota Blueprint - negatives for city maps
3. Advantage Advertising & Graphic Service r(509)
4. Minnesota State Auditor
. - thru period ended 11/8/88
5. Rick Je.hy.se'n - Ditch inspectioy.
6. Olson, Gunn and Seran, Ltd. - legal services
7. E.A. Hickok & Assoc. - Engineering (509)
8. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - Acct./Adm.
- General Fund
9. A. M. Sannerud 8. As~e.c. , P. A. - Acct. /Adm.
- Projects
Ditch 41 = $ 248.85'
Ditch 44 = 47.70
Di tch 54 = 36.25
Ditch 57 = 140.40
Di tch 58 = 406.95
D itch 59 = 154.50
10. A.M. Sannerud 8. Assoc., P.A. - Acct./Adm.
- MSA 509
LE. G, /lL-
t2.Hc-INEfZ...12 lAIC
A c c.(: +- A 0 rh
MANA &€,QS ---
D 1((./1 01 r; G IN G .-:--.
A LL OT/! E /2 fii;?,,!WJ,
g I 4--:J.. 7 ~ 7')..
5(P3,:J.~
q J ;>., <'] 5".5"5"
-0-
0-
4) 33S-.;).'i;'
-rOT f+- L-
d..~) 00 I , <?S3
o
f,J -
$
18.36 -
131.7(1 -
472.00 ~
3,399. i2 -
314.10 --
8,427.72 .--
563.28 -
8,074.65 --
1,034.65 -
166.25 -
2).)~OI.b]
q. /-/-
o
COON CHEEK WATEHSI-lED DISTRICT
BILLS TO BE PAID
December 19, 1988
.\
1. Minnesota State Auditor
2. A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - Acct./Adm.
- Genet'al F'.md
~. R.M. Sannerud & Rssoc., P.R. - Rcct./Adm.
Pt'e..j ect s
Ditch 41 = $ 345.90
Ditch 54 = 59.75
Ditch 57 = 150.45
Ditch 58 = 92.10
Ditch 59 = 150.45
4. R.M. Sannerud & Assoc.,P.A: - Acct./Adm.
- MSR 509
L&G:,AL
I~ 1'1 GIN fZ- Ei. R / 1\/iD ,. --..
A ccT, c6 A (')'/'1'1 --.-
n1 A J'.( I~ G Ii 12~ 0__-
1:J""'cl-l (J I ~ r; IA/Co-
AL.'- QT/4F-R ~'fP8/'-11J
-0-
- 0 -:---
~J '-/'-/0.90
- cJ-
_.0....-
'Z /1 · r.e 2
rotA L
.3) J. 5~.5':L
o~
o
P&7-
$
8 11. 62 --
1, '+14. 75
798. 65 -
C;].;:;~O .-
3) I- S-~.5:<'
j
Lr.e.
LI=- Co fl L
f0vG, IHsG R. //\1 G ---~
A [) hi q.. I~ C CT --.....-.
)11111\/ /1 C€ R ~ ----..-
O/TcH 01(; G IN,G --"
!~LL 6H'?ifl2. E. 'f/OSN/J,
. "
.
0
1.
~.
.,
~.
4.
co
..J.
5.
COON CREEK WRTERSHED DISTRiC'r
8H..L2 TO GE PAID
JaYlI.\<.u'y 9, 1989
W. / LLS ~~~~~7<.J 1),,-3'-' -&?)
rhe S'I;"'lIlp P",cJ Co:,r,'paY')I, Inc. -
Mick's Printing - Envelopes & receipts
E.A. Hickok & Assoc. - Engineering
A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - Acct./Adm.
- Genet'al F'.md
A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.R., - RC.Crt:./Rdlll.
- Pt":'j ect s I)~
Ditch 41 = $ 337.65
Ditch 44 =
Ditch 54 =
Ditch 5,' =
Ditch 58-
D itch 5':), =
t.:- C"I::"
o I Of ,J,J
34.25
617.25
138. 15
317.75
R.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.R. - Rcct./Adm.
- MSA 509
-0-
3 (; tJ . '73
"lioot.f,45
-0-
...-0 -
:2. <if 7 . 5 L/.-
I()IJ~ L
--
I ) (p 5'2 I 72..
o
:1'11)1' !
C:;~'f:' 1,1"': II'q~~..I~~'H~.L :.:.:
':' :..:: I'll. I>!',: I- l t.',
. ," "l!.t Ii.~)'- ',I +:~. f :.:, "./:;
. i'f-: '.
p~-
.,
50.04
237.5()
360.73 -
it, 859. 32 ...-
1,512.60
632.53
--
r; Co 5"1.. 172-
)
v~
/I
\\ . \ ,. -
I
I
o
CITY of ANDOVEIt
Regular city Council Meeting - March 7, 1989 - Agenda
7:30 P.M. Call to Order
o
r ~,
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Assessment Hearings
1. project 88-13/Creekhaven
2. Project 88-11/Hidden Creek East
3. project 88-7/Brandon's Lakeview Estates
4. project 88-5/Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd
5. Project 87-32jWinslow Hills
6. project 87-21/0ak Bluff 2nd
7. Project 87-27jWoodland Creek
8. Project 88-19jWoodland Creek 2nd
HRA Meeting
Discussion Items
9. "No-wake" Ordinance Public Hearing
10. Ordinance 10 Amendment/Park Dedicationl Cont.
11. Nordeen Special Use Permit
12. Ordinance 87 Amendment
13. Mediation Services
r~~-~rder-Street-arghts-
15. Permit/Integrated Waste Systems
16. Ordinance 10 Amendment
Staff, Committee, Commission
17. Reduction of State Aid Road Funds
18. Animal Control Contract, Cont.
19. Approve Assessment Abatements
$&.--Aw~~d-etdTNo~thwoods-Tennts-eOttrt-
$r~--kttthorr~atron-for-Agreementtereekridge-park-
22. Farm Operations/Special Use Permits
23. Agrichem Lot purchase
Non-Discussion items
24. Accept DeedjWood1and Creek
25. Approve 30 MPH Speed Limit
26. Approve Change orders/88-9 & 88-10
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE M~r~h 7 lqSq
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APP,;o~o"
NO. Approval of Minutes Administration AGE
ITEM I
NO. V. Volk
BY: BY: II
V
The City Counci 1 is requested to approve the following minutes:
February 1, 1989 Special Meeting
February 7, 1989 Regular Meeting
February 21, 1989 Special Meeting
February 21, 1989 Regular Meeting
.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
C TO
, ~
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Assessment Hearings
DATE March 7, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
ITEM
NO.
IP88-I3, Creekhaven
1.
BY:
V. Volk
FOR
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30 P.M. for IP
88-13, Creekhaven.
The total project cost to be assessed is $129,291.81 for 10 years
at 7.44% interest.
These assessments will not be certified to the County but will be
collected by the City.
Attached are a copy of the Assessment Hearing Notice, the
property owners who were notified, TKDA's worksheet for the
project and a resolution adopting the assessment roll.
V:Attachments
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
"
'Gl8"
t-.:.,:,
'.....,..
.!:'~
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 88-13
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on March 7
1989 at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain and Streets
with Concrete Curb and Gutter
in the following described area:
CREEKHAVEN
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 129,291.81 . Written or oral objections will be considered at
the meeting. No appeal may be taken ,as to the amount unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at, the hearing. The Council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed
individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice
to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
o
)
~
~
o
,
o
'"
~
t<;"};{;,,9
88-19
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-27
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-21
The' Gaughan Companies
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
87-32
Gorham Builders
9016 Collins Drive
Anoka, MN 55303
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-5
Hills, Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, MN 55303
Anoka County Highway Dept.
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
, 88-'-13.:
Herb Blommel
R & B Investments
1130 107th Avenue NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-11
Good Value Homes
1460 93rd Lane NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-7
Jerry Tollefson Construction
311 Sunrise Lane
Champlin, MN 55316
I~
..-'.,......',
" ." ~-.
."
"
.
o
PER LOT ASSESSMENT
Lateral Assessment~
Sanl tary Sewer
Watermaln
Storm Sewer
street and Restoration
Subtotal
Trunk Assessments*
Sanitary Sewer:
Co nnect I on
Area
Connect I on
Area
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
CR EEKH AV EN
PROJ ECTS 88-13
COMMISSION NO. 9273-03
Feasl bll Ity
Report*
Fi nal
Cost
%
Change
Watermaln:
Subtotal
TOTAL ASSESSMENT PER LOT**
TOTAL PROJ ECT roST
Construction Cost
Expenses
Trunk Source & Storage
Total Cost of Improvement
$ 1,500.72 $ 1,288.07
$ 1,859.52 $ 1,745,23
$ 310.96 $ 302.26
$ 1,995.24 $ 681 .92
$ 5,666.44 $ 4,017 .48 (-29.1%)
$ 211.15 $ 211.15
$ 340.04 $ 340.04
$ 223.84 $ 223.84
$' 65.48 $ 65.48
$ 840.51 $ 840.51 (same)
$ 6,506.95 $ 4,857.99 (-25.3%)
$122,620.00 $ 91,255.07
$ 36,790.00 $ 22,194.96
$ 22,854.45 $ 23,092.10
$181,474.45 $136,542.13 (-24.8%)
City Share (One-sided Watermaln Benefit) $ 17,745.00 $ 7,250.32
Total Assessment (AI I Lots)
<w/o Non-Creekhaven Lot)
$163,729.45 $129,291.81
$126,307.78 (-22.9%)
Assessment Rol Is
10 Years @ 7.44%
Equal Payment
* Note: Assessments remaining after previous assessment rol Is.
o ** Note: PIN 33-32-24-24-0005, outsl de of pi at, ra:Juested a water serv Ice.
~
Assessment Rate: Watermaln
Tr WM Area (0.3AC @ $896.00)
Tr WM Connection
$1,745.23
$ 268.80
$ 970.00
$2,984.03
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS PROJECT NO.
88-13, CREEKHAVEN.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.44 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
ce50lution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
o
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE March 7. 1989
2.
BY:
V. Volk
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Assessment Hearing
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
ITEM
NO.
IP88-11, Hidden Creek
East
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30 P.M. for IP
88-11, Hidden Creek East.
The total project cost to be assessed is $334,106.55 for 10 years
at 7.44% interest.
These assessments will not be certified to the County but will be
collected by the City.
Attached are a copy of the Assessment Hearing Notice, the
property owners who were notified, TKDA's worksheet for the
project and a resolution adopting the assessment roll.
V:Attachments
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'.'
o
t."." ".',,"'~l
\.21
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 88-11
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on March 7
19 89 at 7: 30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain and Streets
with Concrete Curb and Gutter
in the following described area:
HIDDEN CREEK EAST 1ST ADDITION
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 334,106.55 . Written or oral objections will be considered at
the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed
individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice
,to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal .
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
o
o-j
{,
0J
o 88-19
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-27
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-21
The Gaughan Companies
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
87-32
Gorham Builders
9016 Collins Drive
Anoka, MN 55303
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88~5
Hills, Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, MN 55303
Anoka County Highway Dept.
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-13
Herb Blommel
R & B Investments
1130 107th Avenue NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-11 .
Good Value Homes
1460 93rdLane NE
Blaine, MN 55434
o
88-7
Jerry Tollefson Construction
311 Sunrise Lane
Champlin, MN 55316
,....
~i"'"
......'........".'.'
';,',';;','
.-
,~
o
o
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
HIDDEN CREEK EAST
PROJ ECTS 88-11
COMMISSION NO. 9194-03
TOTAL PROJ ECT CDST
Construct I on Cost
Expenses
Trunk Source & Storage
Total Cost of Improvement
$284,760.00 $272,192.02
$ 71,190.00 $ 59,540.00
$ 9,451.70 $ 9.924.05
$365,401.70 $341,656.07 (- 6.5%>
0.00 $ 7,549.52
City Share (Verdin Street R/W from 87-6> $
Tota I Assessment
Assessment Rol I s
10 Years @ 7.44%
Equal Payment
$365,401. 70 $334,106.55 (-8.6%>
~
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS PROJECT NO.
88-11, HIDDEN CREEK EAST.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.44 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
o
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
",
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Assessment Hearings
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
March 7, 1989
ITEM Project 88 7, Brandon's
NO. Lakeview Estates
3.
BY:
V. Vo1k
APPROVED FOR
AGEN(A~
By:!J j,
V
P.M. for IP
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30
88-7, Brandon's Lakeview Estates.
The total project cost to be assessed is $29,703.00 for 10 years
at 7.44% interest:.
These assessments will not be certified to the County but will be
collected by the City.
Attached are a copy of the Assessment Hearing Notice, the
property owners who were notified, TKDA's worksheet for the
project and a resolution adopting the assessment roll.
V:Attachments
.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
CITO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 88-7
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on March 7
19~ at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of Watermain, Sanitary Sewer and Streets
in the following described area:
BRANDON'S LAKEVIEW ESTATES
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 29,703.00 . Written or oral objections will be considered at
the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed
individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice
to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Cleik.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
o
~.
'~_J
o 88-19
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-27
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-21
The Gaughan Companies
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
87-32
Gorham Builders
9016 Collins Drive
Anoka, MN 55303
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-5
Hills, Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, MN 55303
Anoka County Highway Dept.
144~ Bunker Lake Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
.'
88-13
Herb Blommel
R & B Investments
1130 107th Avenue NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-11
Good Value Homes
1460 93rd Lane NE
Blaine, MN 55434
o
88-7
Jerry Tollefson Construction
311 Sunrise Lane
Champlin, MN 55316
o
o
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
BRANDON'S LAKEV IEW ESTATES
ffiOJ ECTS 88-7
(X)MMISS ION NO. 9172-03
TOTAL ffiOJ ECT fiST
Construct i on Cost
Expenses
Trunk Source & Storage
Total Cost of Improvement
$ 35,500.00 $ 30,183.60
$ 10,650.00 $ 7,355.00
$ 6,148.60 $ 6,149.24
$ 52,298.60 $ 43,687.84 (-17.0%>
City Share <One-si ded benef it)
$ 19,474.00 $ 13,984.84
$ 32,824.60 $ 29,703.00 (-9.5%>
Total Assessment
Assessment Rol Is
10 Years @ 7.44%
Eq ua I Pay ment
o
..0
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PROJECT NO. 88-7, BRANDON'S LAKEVIEW
ESTATES.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.44 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
resolution, and Councilmen
voting in favor of the
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
t,
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 7, 1989
ITEM IP88-5, Hills of Bunke
NO. Lake 3rd
4.
BY: V. Volk
APPROV)'D OR
AGENDf I
\ J\
BY: / (7
V
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Assessment Hearings
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30 P.M. for
Project 88-5, Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd Addition and the County
Highway Building.
The total project cost to be assessed is $546,609.69 for the
Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd and $29,318.05 for the County, for a
total of $575,927.74. These are 10 year assessments at 7.44%
interest.
These assessments will not be certified to the County, but will
be collected by the city.
Attached are a copy of the Assessment Hearing notice, the
property owners who were notified, TKDA's worksheet for the
project and a resolution adopting the assessment roll.
V:Attachments
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
L
,--",'
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 88-5
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on March 7
19~ at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of Water main, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain and Streets
with Concrete Curb and Gutter
in the following described area:
HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 3RD ADDITION
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 575,927.74 . written or oral objections will be considered at
the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed
individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice
to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
o
. \
-------
o
88-19
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-27
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-21
The Gaughan Companies
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
87-32
Gorham Builders
9016 Collins Drive
Anoka, MN 55303
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-5
Hills, Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, MN 55303
Anoka County Highway Dept.
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-13 <
Herb Blommel
R & B Investments
1130 107th Avenue NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-11
Good Value Homes
1460 93rd Lane NE
Blaine, MN 55434
o
88-7
Jerry Tollefson Construction
311 Sunrise Lane
Champlin, MN 55316
~1
o
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28; 1989
HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 3RD ADDITION
PROJ ECT 88-5
COMMISSION NO. 9152-03
Feasibility Final
Report* Cost
%
Change
PER LOT ASSESSfJENT
Lateral A5sessments
Sanitary Sewer
Watermaln
Storm Sew er
Street and Restoration
Trunk Assessments
Sanitary Sewer:
Watermaln:
Connection
Connection
$ 2,648.00 $ 1,363.26
$ 1,931.1 5 $ 1,514.57
$ 1,342.80 $ 616.74
$ 1,980.05 $ 1,607.15
$ 7,902.00 $ 5,101.72 (-35.4%)
$ 211.15 $ 211.15
$ 970.00 $ 970.00
$, 1 ,1 81 .1 5 $ 1,181.15 (same)
$ 9,083.15 $ 6,282.87 (-30.8%)
$38,415.00** $12,565.74 (-67.3%)
Subtotal
Subtota I
TOTAL ASSESSMENT PER LOT
Res! dentl al
Commercl al
TOTAL ffiOJ ECT COST
Construct I on Cost
Expenses
Trunk Source & Storage**
$522,751.00 $353,900.01
$156,825.00 $ 80,709.63
$193,204.05 $112,000.05
Total Cost of Improvement
$872,780.00 $546,609.69 (-37.4%)
City Share
$
0.00 $
0.00
Total Assessment (Hills only)
County Shop A55essment
$872,780.00 $546,609.69 (-37.4%)
$ 29,318.05
Total Assessment Roll
$575,927.74
A5S6ssment Rol Is
10 Years @ 7.44%
Equal Payment
4C) * Note: Based on average of al I HII Is, Inc., unplatted property.
** Note: Commercial site was assessed only for 2 REU watermaln connections
per commercial lot, or $1,940.00/lot. At time of building permit,
commercial lot is to pay remainder of fee at $4,850.00/acre (1988 rate) per
assessment pol Icy. Temporary cost savings to development Is approximately
$80,995.00
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARy SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS PROJECT NO.
88-5, HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 3RD ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment I a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.44 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 7, 1989
5.
BY:
V. Volk
OR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Assessment Hearings
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
ITEM IP87-32/Winslow Hills
NO.
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30
87-32, Winslow Hills.
The total project cost to be assessed is $813,966.76 for 10 years
at 7.44% interest.
These assessments will not be certified to the County but will be
collected by the City.
Attached are a copy of the Assessment Hearing Notice, the
property owners who were notified, TKDA's worksheet for the
project and a resolution adopting the assessment roll.
V:Attachments
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
"
o
o
\
~
. I
~.
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 87-32
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on March 7
19~ at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain and Streets
with Concrete Curb and Gutter
in the following described area:
WINSLOW HILLS
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 813,966.76 Written or oral objections will be considered at
the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed
individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice
to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
OF THE CITY COUNCIL
\
~
'-.---.
CD 88-19
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-27
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
."
87-21
The Gaughan Companies
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
87-32
Gorham Builders
9016 Collins Drive
Anoka, MN 55303
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-5
Hills, Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, MN 55303
Anoka County Highway Dept.
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
,
88-13
Herb Blommel
R & B Investments
1130 107th Avenue NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-11
Good Value Homes
1460 93rd Lane NE
Blaine, MN 55434
o
88-7
Jerry Tollefson Construction
311 Sunrise Lane
Champlin, MN 55316
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEAR INGS
o
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
WINSLOW HILLS
PROJ ECf 87-32
COMMISSION NO. 9100-03
Feasibility Final
Report Cost
%
Change
PER LOT ASSESSM::NT
Lateral Assessments
Sanitary Sewer (w/o Trunk Benef It)
Watermaln (w/o Trunk Benefit)
Storm Sew er
Street and Restoration
$ 1,654.62
$ 1,393.95
$ 1,546.82
$ 2,542.80
$ 936.10
$ 956.03
$ 1,548.81
$ 2,175.16
Subtotal
$ 7,138.19 $ 5,616.10 (-27.1%)
Trunk Assessments
Sanitary Sewer:
Connect I on
Lateral
Connection
Lateral
Area (87-11 B)
$ 211.15
$ 1,184.00
$ 970.00
$"1,144.00
$ 767.96
Watermain:
Storm Sewer:
$ 211.15
$ 1,184.00
$ 970.00
$ 1,144.02
$ 751.41
Subtotal $ 4,276.96 $ 4,260.58 (- 0.4%)
TOTAL ASSESSMENT PER LOT $11,415.15 $ 9,876.68 (-15.6%)
TOTAL WINSLOW HOLASEK OUTLOT (3 LOTS)* $29,457.00 $23,832.36 (-23.6%)
TOTAL PROJ ECf COST
Construct I on Cost
Expenses
Trunk Source & Storage
Trunk Storm Sewer (87-11B)
$449,660.00 $384,981.18
$142,810.00 $ 81,155.12
$287,710.00 $287,717.66
$ 61,430.00 $ 60,112.80
$941,610.00 $813,966.76 (-15.7%)
Total Cost of Improvement
City Share
$
0.00 $
0.00
$941,610.00 $813,966.76 (-15.7%)
Tota I Assessment
o
Assessment Rol I s
10 Years @ 7.44%
Equal Payment
* Includes lateral assessments and trunk lateral assessments for 3 REU.
o
.0
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~OTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS PROJECT NO.
87-32, WINSLOW HILLS.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.44 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the county Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Assessment Hearings
DATE March 7. 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
ITEM IP87-21jOak Bluff 2nd
NO.
6.
BY:
V. Volk
BY:
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30 P.M. for
87-21, Oak Bluff 2nd Addition.
The total project cost to be assessed is $587,721.32 for 10 years
at 7.44% interest.
These assessments will not be certified to the County but will be
collected by the City.
Attached are a copy of the Assessment Hearing Notice, the
property owners who were notified, TKDA's worksheet for the
project and a resolution adopting the assessment roll.
V:Attachments
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 87-21
r;~\
~
NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that the City Coun.cil of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover;fCity Hall,'1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on March 7
19..8..!L at "7:3~ P.M. to pass upon theproposed'assessment:,/for the
improvement 0 Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain and Streets
with Concrete Curb and Gutter
in ,the following described area:
,,'
';,
OAK BLUFF 2ND ADDITION;';'
"-:.,""-..'.'
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 587,721.32 . Written or oral objections~will be considered at'
the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the/amount unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to, ,the hearing or
, presented to the presiding officer at(the hearing.\tThe Council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the~amounto~ a proposed
individual assessment at an adjourned meeting . uponsucl1,\fHrther notice
to the affected property owners as i t,deems adv~sable .\;1';')}';,
~", ..". '...-' .
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the Cit;y within 30,daysafter the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor of.Cl~rk.'" .::
o
....;,.).,.-,. .,
o
r/-,?,~
~
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-27
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN ,55303
fi8 7-21~.i::
~,,,~,;,'~>.>,, ,,_ ' :1
The Gaughan Companies,
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
87-32
Gorham Builders
9016 Collins Drive
Anoka, MN 55303
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-5
Hills, Inc.
854 East River'Road
Anoka, MN 55303
Anoka County Highway Dept.
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304 '
88-13
Herb Blommel
R & B Investments
~130 107th Avenue NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-11
Good Value Homes
1460 93rd Lane NE
Blaine, MN 55434
o
88-7
Jerry Tollefson Construction
.311 Sunrise Lane
Champlin, MN 55316
r"
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
OAK BLUFF 2 NO ADD I T ION
PROJ ECT 87-21
CDMMISSION NO. 9117-03
o
PER LOT ASSESSMENT
Lateral Assessments
Sanitary Sewer (w/o Trunk Benef it)
Watermain (w/o Trunk Benefit)
Storm Sewer
Street and Restoration
Subtotal
Trunk Assessments
Sanitary Sewer:
Connection
Lateral
Connection
Lateral
Area (87-11B)
Watermain:
Storm Sewer:
Subtotal
TOTAL ASSESSMENT PER LOT
TOTAL PROJ ECT CDST
Construction Cost
Expenses
Trunk Source & Storage
Trunk Storm Sewer (87-11B)
Total Cost of Improvement
City Share (Trunk Storm, 87-11)
Tota I Assessment
o
Assessment Rol Is
10 Years @ 7.44%
Equal Payment
Feasibil ity Final
Report Cost
%
Change
$ 1,345.22 $ 979.40
$ 1,460.65 $ 1,217.71
$ 1,306.80 $ 493.67
$ 2,255.17 $ 1,870.30
$ 6,367.84 $ 4,561.08 (-28.4%)
$ 211.15 $ 211.15
$ 405.81 $ 405.81
$ 970.00 $ 970.00
$' 435.54 $ 435.54
$ 2,053.31 $ 1.358.60
$ 4,075.81 $ 3,381.10 <-17.0%)
$10,443.65 $ 7,942.1 8 (-24.0%)
$408,920.00 $280,281.27
$ 62,300.00 $ 60,840.23
$149,685.00 $149,665.00
$155,945.00 $100,536.40
$776,850.00 $591,322.90 (-23.9%)
-$ 4,000.00 -$ 3.601.58
$772,850.00 $587,721.32 (-24.0%)
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS PROJECT NO.
87-21, OAK BLUFF 2ND ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.44 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Assessment Hearings
DATE March 7, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
7.
BY: V. Vo1k
ITEM IP8 7 - 2 7 jWood1and Creek
NO.
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30
87-27, Woodland Creek.
The total project cost to be assessed is $7071399.47 for 10 years
at 7.44% interest.
These assessments will not be certified to the County but will be
collected by the City.
Attached are a copy of the Assessment Hearing Notice, the
property owners who were notified, TKDA's worksheet for the
project and a resolution adopting the assessment roll,
V:Attachments
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
\
~-~
~/
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 87-27
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on March 7
1989 at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain and Streets
with Concrete Curb and Gutter
in the following described area:
WOODLAND CREEK
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 707,399.47 . Written or oral objections will be considered at
the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed
individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice
to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
o
R
\
'.-.../
, I
'--,
o 88-19
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-27
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
.'
87-21
The Gaughan Companies
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
87-32
Gorham Builders
9016 Collins Drive
Anoka, MN 55303
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-5
Hills, Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, MN 55303
Anoka County Highway Dept.
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-13
Herb Blommel
R & B Investments
1130 107th Avenue NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-11
Good Value Homes
1460 93rd Lane NE
Blaine, MN 55434
o
88-7
Jerry Tollefson Construction
311 Sunrise Lane
Champlin, MN 55316
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
o
llJESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
WOODlAND CREEK 1ST & 2ND ADDITIONS
PROJ ECTS 87-27 AND 88-19
COMMISSION NO. 8998-03
Feasibility
Report*
Final
Cost
%
Change
PER LOT ASSESSPENT
Lateral Assessments
Sanl tary Sewer
Watermaln
Storm Sew er
Street and Restoration
$ 2,634.89
$ 1,693.00
$ 1,406.54
$ 2,263.57
$ 2,010.94
$ 1,627.96
$ 1,334.35
$ 2,031.83
Subtotal
$ 7,998.00 $ 7,005.08
(-12.4%)
Trunk Assessments
Sanitary Sewer: Connection
$ 201.10 $ 211.15
TOTN.. ASSESSMENT PER LOT
Resl denti al **
Commercial***
$ 8, 1 99. 1 0
$32,394.20
$ 7,216.23
$28,441.90
(-12.0%)
(-12.2%)
TOTN.. FROJ ECT COST
Total Cost of Improvement
City Share
$855,170.00 $826,575.53
$256,550.00 $150,936.25
$ 27.952.90 $ 65,640.65
$1,139,672.90 $1,043,152.43
(- 8.5%)
Construction Cost
Expenses
Trunk Source & Storage****
$ 10,245.00 $
3,806.38
Total Assessment
$1,129,427.90 $1,039,346.05 (- 8.0%)
Assessment Rol Is
10 Years @ 7.44% (1st Addition)
10 Years @ 8.50% (2nd Addition)
Equal Payment
* Note: Average fram al I property proposed to be developed. Initial phases
estimated to be higher In cost due to entrance design and sanitary sewer
depth.
o
** Note: Adol fson assessed for 2 lots along entrance road. Assessments
proposed to be deferred until hookup to utilities.
*** Note: Commercial lot watermaln connection charge previously assessed at
resl dentl al rates.
**** Note: All remaining trunk area charges assessed to cover proposed
development pi an.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS PROJECT NO.
87-27, WOODLAND CREEK 1ST ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 7.44 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk
City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE March 7. 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Assessment Hearings
ITEM IP88-19jWoodland Creek
NO. 8 . 2nd
Administration
BY:V. Yolk
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30
88-19, Woodland Creek 2nd Addition.
The total project cost to be assessed is $331,946.58 for 10 years
at 7.44% interest.
These assessments will not be certified to the County but will be
collected by the City.
Attached are a copy of the Assessment Hearing Notice, the
property owners who were notified, TKDA's worksheet for the
project and a resolution adopting the assessment roll.
V:Attachments
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~,'
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 88-19
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on March 7
19~ at 7:1f P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement 0 Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain and Streets
with Concrete Curb and Gutter
in the following described area:
WOODLAND CREEK 2ND ADDITION
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 331.946.58 . Written or oral objections will be considered at
the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed
individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice
to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
o
"
\..-'
q8-19
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303
87-27
Lawrence B. Carlson
830 West Main
Anoka, MN 55303'
..
87-21
The Gaughan companies
299 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
87-32
Gorham Builders
9016 Collins Drive
Anoka, MN 55303
Winslow Holasek
1159 Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
~
Hills, Inc.
854 East River Road
Anoka, MN 55303
Anoka County Highway Dept.
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
88-13
Herb Blommel
R & B Investments
1130 107th Avenue NE
Blaine, MN 55434
88-11
Good Value Homes
1460 93rd Lane NE
Blaine, MN 55434
o
88-7
-
Jerry Tollefson construction
311 Sunrise Lane
Champlin, MN 55316
"
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
o
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989
WOODLAND CREEK 1ST & 2ND ADDITIONS
PROJ ECTS 87-27 AND 88-19
COMMISSION NO. 8998-03
Feasibility Final
Report* ('..cst
%
Change
PER LOT ASSESSrENT
Lateral Assessments
Sanitary Sewer
Watermaln
Storm Sew er
Street and Restoration
$ 2,634.89
$ 1 ,693.00
$ 1,406.54
$ 2,263.57
$ 2,010.94
$ 1,627.96
$ 1,334.35
$ 2,031.83
Subtotal
$ 7,998.00 $ 7,005.08
(-12.4%)
Trunk Assessments
Sanitary Sewer: Connection
$ 201 .1 0 $ 211 .1 5
TOTn.. ASSESSMENT PER LOT
Resl dentl al **
Commerclal***
$ 8, 1 99. 1 0
$32,394.20
$ 7,216.23
$28,441.90
(-12.0%)
(-12.2%)
TOTn.. FROJ ECT COST
Total Cost of Improvement
$855,170.00 $826,575.53
$256,550.00 $150,936.25
$ 27.952.90 $ 65,640.65
$1,139,672.90 $1,043,152.43
(- 8.5%>
Construct I on Cost
Expenses
Trunk Source & Storage****
City Share
Total Assessment
$ 10,245.00 $
3.806.38
$1,129,427.90 $1,039,346.05 (- 8.0%)
Assessment Rol Is
10 Years @ 7.44% (1st Addition)
10 Years @ 8.50% (2nd Addition)
Equal Payment
* Note: Average fromal I property proposed to be developed. Initial phases
estimated to be higher In cost due to entrance design and sanitary sewer
depth.
o
** Note: Adol fson assessed for 2 lots along entrance road. Assessments
proposed to be deferred until hookup to utilities.
*** Note: Commercial lot watermaln connection charge previously assessed at
resl dentl al rates.
**** Note: All remaining trunk area charges assessed to cover proposed
develoJXllent pi an.
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS PROJECT NO.
88-19, WOODLAND CREEK 2ND ADDITION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
~and therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1990 and shall bear interest at a rate of 8.50 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Treasurer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
Meeting this
day of
,19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
voting against,
resolution, and Councilmen
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
March 7, 1989
DATE
BY:
581~
Blake, Planner
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. HRA Meeting
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
ITEM
NO.
Authorize Lot Sales
Nordeen's Addition
Jay
The Andover Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is requested
to authorize the sale of two (2) city owned lots in the Nordeen's
Addition. The two lots were part of the City's neighborhood
revitalization efforts in this area. The properties are:
Property
Lot 4, Block 1 (Wallum)
Address
Lot 4, Block 3 (Rindahl)
15619 Kumquat st.
15539 Larch st.
The HRA should consider advertising for bids on the lots. Funds
received from the sale of the lots will be added to our CDBG
account with Anoka County. Please refer to the enclosed map of
the area.
Also, please review the enclosed letter from JoAnn wright,
regarding the funds available from the 1987 Andover Community
Development Block Grant. We are required to expend these funds by
June 30, 1989, or the funds will be made available to other
communities. please make a note of any properties around the City
that may be purchased with funds from this program.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
"
o
_~;z) ,..,1' cc>>...
~
~
~
" ~~~f
',~ II:~ li _-
" ~,~,-
'~~
:::::~
~'"
~
"":2:
,-...,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ~
I "
f '
I ,
I I
, I
."'it'D I <>n- ,
, ,
~ ,
, ,
" d ,
, E ,
,
, ~::: '
, --. ~ So:
. ~""i;t~
, ~t(~
,
, , , . 111
, , . ~
, ,- ..' v I... .,
, /"Jic -' '-~-
- , },~L.- .::s
0, <u>r
~
~""~
~ ~ I:l"-"
~ ~....~'<:
.. ~~~
\;'~
00"
<I<lT
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
,
/
,
/
,1
"
, ;,"
,
,
,
,
,
"
,
,
I
,
,
,
- .'
""'
~
..'
.~. 00'
<1<1/
<1<1,
.---
- OD/
Z'L...
.'
, "
,
.. - ,'~ ..
.. ~ I'<)
, ,
'<:;' , --=- ....
I
~ I ~ .e
0-, . <1<1' <1<1/
'l-
~
'"
~
<I'"
-~-
Z
,
'" I
.. ,
..is
. <1<1
~ ~ ~
Z
% ~
~
. t- ~ Il) .
.
. '\t "J CD .
~ -;;:1<)
~ ~ ~ 10 ~ ~
"-'-, ~
-..:;.
" '.t1~;' <I<I1t " <I<I1t <1-,
..LS .LV" OW">I "
'"
<1-, '1
"
.~ ~
~ .
\:
I: c
~ J
\) -... 'l .,j
'uJ ~ ~~ rJ
~ ~ .~
.~ .
:.:' ~
"" ~
r-; >-i
"
~ S
J
,Ji.1
'-< ~
t,-'
"
o
t -;::. <i.
" -:::.
~ ...... ~ .J
lC\l
:t
~
<1<1, t-
"~N.:
CD
~1O ~~
~- ti)
~ ,<'=
!I!I .s/
~ ::
OJ;
-,
......
~
~
'L~__
~
~ ~
,,,
-,
U6'r~
, 6.>9i:I-
"'"
---~
~<:l
,"l
"
~'BS'L
--~
..::::.0
-e
tS.s'
'Cl
0 ~ .
. ~ 0
, -:::::..
~
Q <10 Q
'I ~
. -;:, Q
~ r-- ~
""" .x:
"'" _<lr
--'/ <lSI t- .....:
~:-d, ~
IC) '< ......
0 , .'
0 ~\o Ii! at)
~'Z . ""'-
0'" OS/ ~
HO~V1 ~
u,
<1<1,
";s ~
~ ~
~ R 1'..,
______" __u__
~---- -;~-.;:..- . N
~ 1.......~tN
. -'. \
SRI -..,
I
11
~
~
<l
..
~
o
ell,..,..
)W~
~.it-l
"1'1l
-=-,
~
;;::
\
~
~ ~
~ ~
"J ~ ~t
----- ---'\F--
--.
"
~
--~--~
<I,,,
D~/ 4"/
"
11'
.ll
I...:'~
'"
...,..!l
~~ .
()' . ~........fWI.
(\J 1] '~...
-lI ~ ~ ij
~ ~l
.9}1, lrj
0-
'"
'"
::t
~
..:
l!:
.~
~
~
~ ~~
~'f,
, ~......
"
1
li
.
"
'!
,S;L;. €
.,
fi'
"
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
.
1
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
I
I
I
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
. ,
I'
:1
~!~
,.;(1',
, ~...:
, ltf-l.
..I It
I ,
/ !
'J : :1
-i._-~
i
,
,
I
I
.
,
,
,
,
,
~
CO U N TY
OF
ANOKA
Office of the County Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA,MINNESOTA55303 612-421-4760
February 15, 1989
Mr. Jay Blake, Planner
City of Andover
Community Center
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N'w.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Re: Eighteen-Month Rule for CDBG Expenditures -
Applied to 1987 Projects
Dear Jay:
Eighteen months have passed since the allocation of 1987 CDBG funds, and the 1987 projects
are under consideration for compliance with the "eighteen-month rule". I have listed below any
of the 1987 CDBG projects in the City of where unexpended balances remain.
As specified by Anoka County Board action, a six month extension is offered to communities
who have not fully expended their CDBG funds. On July 1, 1989, any remaining unexpended
balances will revert to Anoka County for other CDBG-eligible uses. Funds encumbered by
legally binding contract will meet the expenditure test of this rule. The same expenditure rules
apply to any program income received in revolving funds administered by the City or City
Development Corporations.
If you will not have completely expended the balances below by June 30, 1989, but have a
contract ~hich will meet the requirements, please forward a copy to my office.
#746
Acquisition
$37,816.39
If your records differ from mine, please call me at 421-4760, extension 1178.
Sincerely,
JoAnn O. Wright
Community Development Manager
JOW:sw
o
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
',$'):>1
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE March 7, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion I m
9.
"No Wake~ Ordinance
Public Hearing
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
FOR
ITEM
NO.
Engineering
BY: James E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to consider the comments of the
public and make a recommendation to the Lower Rum River Water
Management Organization on the proposed "No Wake" Ordinance. The
revised ordinance proposes posting "No Wake" signs where boat
traffic and/or water skiing causes erosion problems or danger to
other users of the river.
The LRRWMO has asked that each city propose the areas that they
determine to be a problem. The cities on opposite shores will
have to jointly agree or the Water Management Organization will
have to make the determination.
In Andover, I know only of the concerns of Lyle Bradley as he has
appeared at the Board Meeting and at the last public meeting the
City of Andover held.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING EROSION CONTROLS
AND LIMITING THE WAKE FROM BOATS
AND WATERSKIING ON THE LOWER RUM RIVER
Anoka County does ordain:
Section is hereby added to the County's Code of Ordinances
and shall read as follows:
Sect ion 1.
Water Craft ~ Erosion ~ Lower Rum River
Purpose. The limitations contained in this ordinance are
designed to prevent and limit the erosion which is
occurring to the banks and shoreline of the Lower Rum
River. The heavy wake from boats creates wave action
which is eroding the shoreline, banks, and bluffs along
the river and is adverse to the public's interest in
maintaining and preserving the shoreline. Swimmers,
people canoeing, and other people using the river more
passively are placed in jeopardy by fast boats and wave
actions, and this ordinance is designed to protect the
health, safety, and general welfare of the public.
Section 2.
Requlations.
A. Minimum Wake Restrictions. No person shall
navigate, place, maintain, or operate any boat,
motor boat; or watercraft of any kind upon the Rum
River in the areas herein designated quiet waters
at a speed which results in more than a minimum
wake.
B. Waterskiinq Restricted. No person shall
navigate or operate any boat or wat~rcraft
pulling a water skier nor shall anyone engage in
-waterskiing in a quiet waters area as defined
herein.
C. Quiet Waters Areas.
1. All that part of the Rum River from its
confluence with the Mississippi River upstream to
the City of Anoka's municipal boundary shall be
considered a quiet water.
,0
2. That part
to
shall be considered
of the Rum River from
in the Ci ty of Ramsey
a quiet water.
3. That part of the Rum River from
to in the City of
Andover shall be considered a quiet water.
l:
o
D.
SiQns - PostinQ. The Sher iff Or County
Administrator shall provide for the erection of
signs at all public accesses and at other
appropriate locations along the Rum River to
inform operators of watercraft ,', of the wake
limitation and the waterskiing limitation
applicable to this sensitive portion of the
river.
E. Operation of watercraft with which creates more
than a minimum wake as allowed by this ordinance
or any boat operator who pulls a water' skier as
prohibited by paragraph B is prima facie evidence
that the watercraft is being operated in
violation of this Ordinance.
~
o
o
RESOLUTION NO..
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO ESTABLISHING EROSION
CONTROLS AND LIMITING THE WAKE FROM BOATS
AND WATERSKIING ON THE LOWER RUM RIVER
AND ESTABLISHING QUIET WATER AREAS
WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization has
been contacted by property owners living on the Lower Rum River who are
concerned by erosion of banks and shorelines abutting the River, and
WHEREAS, boats creating a heavy wake have a negative effect on the
safety of people canoeing, swimming, or passively using the River, and
WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization has
contacted the County of Anoka which has indicated that the County Board is
willing to consider an ordinance limiting the wake of boats using the river
and prohibiting waterskiing and if the County Board knows specifically what
the Cities comprising the Lower Rum River Watershed Management
Organization want the County Board to adopt, and
WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization has ,
. studied the issue and has recommended to this Council a draft of a model
ordinance to be presented to the Anoka County Board for adoption, and
WHEREAS, this Council has reviewed the proposed ordinance and the
provisions contained therein,
NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of
, as follows:
1. The recommendations of the Lower Rum River Watershed
Management Organization for adoption of an ordinance establishing erosion
controls and limiting the wake from boats and waterskiing behind boats
operating on a portion of the Lower Rum River is deemed to be in the best
interests of the public.
2. The attached proposed ordinance is hereby returned to the
Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization with the following
suggested changes and the model ordinance should be sent on to Anoka County
for adoption. This City Council approves the terms contained therein and
agrees with the necessity for adopting such an ordinance.
3. The area to be designated as a quiet water within the
corporate boundaries of the City of is as follows:
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE March 7, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Di
Engineering
,;(1YC
BY:
ITEM
NO.
10.
Ordinance 10 Amendment
Park Dedication, cont.
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to review and approve the amendment
to Ordinance 10 Section 9.07 in regard to park dedication
requirements.
Attached is the presentation the Park and Recreation Commission
and city staff have prepared for the February 21, 1989 City
Council meeting.
The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the Ordinance to see
if the $375 is reasonable for the park dedication at their March
2, 1989 regular scheduled meeting. The Park and Recreation
Commission feels the $466 is still reasonable. The Commission
feels they can justify the $466. This justification will be shown
by the Commission at the meeting. (See Exhibit V).
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
"
INTRODUCTION
o
I.
The Park and Recreation Commission and the city staff have
determined that the park dedication fees for the City of
Andover were low in comparison to other communities that are
similar in size and location. The reason for the research of
the park dedication fees by the Park and Recreation
Commission is due to three reasons.
1. A developer has indicated to city staff that the park
dedication is low compared to other surrounding
developing communities.
2. A quick review by city staff of the park dedication of
surrounding communities did indicate higher park
dedication fees.
3. It is required per Ordinance 47 Section 1.6.
II. Concerns
1. It is difficult to administer current park dedication
ordinances because of the following:
A. Fair Market Value of the property is unknown at the
time of final plat.
B. The only known value is the assessed market value as
determined by the County which is less than the fair
market value.
2. Land purchase in advance of platting process.
A. In some cases the developer may have purchased the
land several years ago, but the fair market value at
that time is lower than the fair market value of
today.
3. Under our current ordinance the rural subdivisions are
paying a higher park dedication fee than the urban
subdivisions based on a per dwelling unit.
4. The current ordinance is felt to be outdated and in need
of revision.
o
III. Current Park Dedication
9.07 Parks, Playgrounds, Open Space.
(lOA, 9-10-74)
o
9.07.1 Lands of Public Use or Other Provisions. Pursuant to
Minnesota statute, Chapter 462.358, as amended, the City Council
of the City of Andover shall require all owners or developers, as
a prerequisite to approval of a plat, subdivision or development
of land, to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use, for
park or playground purposes, a reasonable portion of the area
being platted, subdivided or developed as hereinafter specified.
Said portion to be approved and acceptable to the City or in lieu
thereof, the owners or developers shall, at the option of the
City, pay to the City for the use in the acquisition of public
parks, open space and playgrounds, development of existing public
park and playground sites, and debt retirement in connection with
land previously required for public parks and playgrounds, an
equivalent amount in cash based upon the undeveloped land value of
that portion of said land that would have otherwise been required
to be dedicated. The form of contribution (cash or land) shall be
decided by the City based upon need and conformance with approved
City plans. (100, 8-07-79)
9.07.2 Dedicated Land Requirements. Any land to be dedieated
as a requirement of this section shall be reasonably adaptable for
use for active park and recreation purposes and shall be at a
location convenient to the people to be served. Factors used in
evaluating the adequacy of proposed park and recreation areas
shall include size, shape, topographYI geology, tree coverl access
and location. (100, 8-07-79)
9.07.3 Standards for Determination. The Park and Recreation
Commission shall recommend to the City Council adoption of the
ComprehenS\ve Park Development Plan for determining what portion
of each such development should reasonably be required to be so
conveyed or dedicated. Such comprehensive Park Development Plan
may take into consideration, the zoning classification assigned to
the land to be developed, the particular proposed use for such
land, amenities to be provided and factors of density and site
development as proposed by the owners or developers. The Park and
Recreation Commission shall further recommend changes and
amendments to the Comprehensive Park Development Plan to reflect
changes in the usage of land which may occur, changes in zoning
classifications and concepts and changes in planning and
development concepts that relate to the development and usages to
which the land may be put. (100, 8-07-79)
9.07.4 Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation. The
Park and Recreation Commission shall, in each case, recommend to
the City Council the total area and location of such land that the
Commission feels should be so conveyed or dedicated within the
development for park, playground, open space and public use
purposes. (100, 8-07-79)
o
9.07.5 Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands. In those
instances where a cash contribution is to be made by the owners or
developers in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land for park,
playground, open space or public use purposes, the Park and
Recreation Commission shall recommend to the City Council the
amount of cash said Commission feels should be so contributed.
Page 15
o
Such recommendation shall be based on, the
undeveloped land that would otherwise
dedicated. (100, 8-07-79)
market value of the
have been conveyed or
9.07.6
purposes of
the final
following:
Market Value of Lands. "Market Value",
this ordinance, shall be determined as of the
plat without improvements in accordance
for
time
with
the
of
the
a. The Park and Recreation Commission and owners or
developers may recommend as to market value.
b. The City Council, after reviewing the Park and Recreation
Commission's recommendation, may agree with the owner or
developer as to the market value. If agreement is not
reached in this manner, then the market value shall be
determined by an accredited appraiser, agreed upon by the
City Council and the owner or devaloper, at the expense of
the owner or developer. Such appraisal shall be accepted
by the City Council and the owner or developer as being an
accurate appraisal of "mark.t value". (100, 8-07-79)
9.07.7 Density and Open Space Requirements. Land area so
conveyed or dedicated for park, open space and playground purposes
may not be used by an owner or developer as an allowance for
purposes of calculating the density requirements of the
development as set out in the City Zoning Ordinance. The land
shall be in addition to, (except for 9.07.8), and not in lieu of,
open space requirements for Planned Unit Developments pursuant to
the City Zoning Ordinance. (100, 8-07-79)
9.07.8 Credit for Private Open Space. Where private open
space for park and recreation purposes is provided in a proposed
non-residential development and such space is to be privately
owned and maintained by the owner of that non-residential
development, such areas may be used for credit at the discretion
of the City Council against the requirement of dedication for park
and recreation purposes, provided the City Council finds it is in
the public interest to do so and that the following standards are
met:
a. That yards, court areas, setbacks and open space required
to be maintained by City Ordinances shall not be included
in the computation of such private open space;
b. That the private ownership and maintenance of the open
space is adequately provided for by written agreement;
c. That the private open space is restricted for park and
recreation purpose by recorded covenants which run with
the land in favor of the owners of the property within the
non-residential development and which cannot be eliminated
without the consent of the City Council;
o
d.
That the proposed private
adaptable for use for park
open space is
and recreational
reasonably
purposes,
Page 16
o
taking into consideration
topography, geology, access
open space;
such factors as size, shape,
and location of the private
That facilities proposed for the open .s~ace
substantial accordance with the prov1s10ns
recreational element of the Comprehensive Plan,
approved by the City Council and;
f. That where such credit is granted, the amount of credit
shall not exceed one hundred (100%) percent for the non-
residential development of the amount calculated under
Section 9.07.10. (100, 8-07-79)
e.
are
of
and
in
the
are
9.07.9 Park and Recreation Commission Administrative
Procedures. The Park and Recreation Commission shall establish
such administrative procedures as they may deem necessary and
required to implement the provisions of this Ordinance. (100, 8-
07-79)
9.07.10 Dedicated Land, Minimum Area. Developers
within the City of Andover shall be required to dedicate
City for park, open space and playground purposes as a
that percentage of gross land area as set out below:
of land
to the
minimum
a. Residential
Dwelling UnitS/Acre
(Gross Density)
Requirement
0-3
10%
Over 3
Add two (2%) percent to
dedication requirements
for each additional
dwelling unit over three
(3) units per gross
density.
b. Commercial-Industrial
(100, 8-07-79)
SECTION 10. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS.
10%
o
10.01 General Conditions. Upon receipt of preliminary plat
approval by the Council and prior to Council approval of the final
plat, the subdivider shall make provision, in the manner
hereinafter set forth, for the installation, at the sole expense
of the subdivider, of such improvements as shall be required by
the City, which improvements may include, but are not limited to,
streets, sidewalks, public water systems, sanitary sewer systems,
surface and storm drainage systems, and public utility services.
The installation of said improvements shall be in conformity with
approved construction plans and specifications and all applicable
standards and ordinances. .
Page 17
0' 8094
salt).e zones, unless the
safety of the residents of
to exclude or prohibit
therwise permitted by a
7; 1973 c 379 s 4; 1973
x1979 c 2 s 42,43; 1981
985 c 62 s 3; 1985 c 194
DIVISION REGULA-
blic health, safety, and
e development of land,
f housing affordable to
adequate provision for
playgrounds, and other
nce adopt subdivision
res for the review and
y contain varied provi-
ses or kinds of subdivi-
of subdivision.
subdivision regulations
its in any direction but
ided that where two or
four miles apart, each
ce from its boundaries
irements in the regula-
g, and improvement of
rbs and gutters, water
r utilities; the planning
d conservation of flood
lity, and geologic and
s be consistent with the
nce, and may require
plan. The regulations
s where prohibition is
is section, particularly
ibit, restrict or control
s to direct sunlight for
control surface, above
g subsurface areas for
.pursuant to sections
rohibit the issuance of
subdivision approval
ipality to condition its
electric, gas, drainage,
in lieu thereof, on the
ocable letter of credit,
assure the municipal-
tailed according to the
it the municipality to
asoorelated to the
1
1
1
j
i
,J
~
'.,
;
8095
HOUSING, REDEVELOPMENT, PLANNING, ZONING 462.358':1
provisions of the regulations and to execute development contracts embodying the
terms and conditions of approvaL The municipality may enforce such agreements and
conditions by appropriate legal and equitable remedies.
Subd. 2b. Dedication. 'The regulations may require that a reasonable portion of
any proposed subdivision De dedicated to the public or preserved for public use as
streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas, and water facilities, storm water drainage and
holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements.
In addition, the regulations may require that a reasonable portion of any proposed
subdivision be dedicated to the public or preserved for public use as parks, play-
grounds, trails, or open space; provided that (a) the municipality may choose to accept
an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required
to be dedicated to such public uses or purposes based on the fair market value of the
land no later than at the time of final approval, (b) any cash payments received shall
be placed in a special fund by the municipality used only for the purposes for which
the money was obtained, (c) in establishing the reasonable portion to be dedicated, the
regulations may consider the open space, park, recreational, or common areas and
facilities which the applicant proposes to reserve for the subdivision, and (d) the
municipality reasonably determines that it will need to acquire that portion of land for
the purposes stated in this paragraph as a result of approval of the subdivision.
Subd.3. [Repealed, 1980 c 566 s 35]
Subd. 3a. Platting. The regulations may require that any subdivision creating
parcels, tracts, or lots, shall be platted. The regulations shall require that all subdivi-
sions which create five or more lots or parcels which are 2-1/2 acres or less in size shall
be platted. The regulations shall not conflict with the provisions of chapter 505 but may
address subjects similar and additional to those in that chapter.
Subd. 3b. Review procedures. The regulations shall include provisions regarding
the content of applications for proposed subdivisions, the preliminary and final review
and approval or disapproval of applications, and the coordination of such reviews with
affected political subdivisions and state agencies. The regulations may provide for the
consolidation of the preliminary and final review and approval or disapproval of
subdivisions. Preliminary or final approval may be granted or denied for parts of
subdivision applications. The regulations may delegate the authority to review propos-
als to the planning commission, but final approval or disapproval shall be the decision
of the governing body of the municipality unless otherwise provided by law or charter.
The- regulations shall require that a public hearing shall be held on all subdivision
applications prior to preliminary approval, unless otherwise provided by law or charter.
The hearing shall be held following publication of notice of the time and place thereof
in the official newspaper at least ten days before the day of the hearing. At the hearing,
all persons interested shall be given an opportunity to make presentations. A subdivi-
sion application shall be preliminarily approved or disapproved within 120 days
following delivery of an application completed in compliance with the municipal
ordinance by the applicant to the municipality, unless an extension of the review period
has been agreed to by the applicant. When a division or subdivision to which the
regulations of the municipality do not apply is presented to the city, the clerk of the
municipality shall within ten days certify that the subdivision regulations of the
municipality do not apply to the particular division.
If the municipality or the responsible agency of the municipality fails to prelimin-
arily approve or disapprove an application within the review period, the application
shall be deemed preliminarily approved, and upon demand the municipality shall
execute a certificate to that effect. Following preliminary approval the applicant may
request final approval by the municipality, and upon such request the municipality
shall certify final approval within 60 days if the applicant has complied with all
conditions al!d requirements of applicable regulations and all conditions and require-
ments upon which the preliminary approval is expressly conditioned either through
performance or the execution of appropriate agreements assuring performance. If the
municipality fails to certify final approval as so required, and if the applicant has
( ..
o
.7ff
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 47
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PARK COWAISSION AND REGULATING CONDUCT IN PUBLIC
PARKS; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATIONS
OF ITS PROVISIONS.
The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain:
SECTION 1. There is hereby created a Park Commission.
1.1 COMPOSITION The Park Commission shall consist of seven (7) members.
The members shall be appointed by the City Council by a majority vote.
A member may be removed at any time by a majority vote of the City Council.
A. Terms of Office The seven (7) members shall be appointed for
three (J) year staggered terms: Terms shall expire on January 1.
Original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until
their successors are appointed. Vacancies during a term shall be
filled by the City Qouncil for the unexpired portion of the term.
B. Absences Three consecutive unexcused absences of a member from
duly called Commission meetings shall constitute automatic
resignation from office. Determination that an absence is
unexcused shall be in the discretion of the Commission Chairperson.
C. Compensation All Commission members s~all serve ~~th such
compensation as may be set by resolution of the City Council.
1.2 PARK C~AISSION CHAIRPERSON The City Council shall appoint a Chairperson
from among the appointed Commission members who shall serve for a term of
one (1) year; the Commission may create and fill such other offices as it
may deem necessary for its O~n1 administration. The Commission Chairperson
shall attend City Council meetings upon the request of the City Council.
1.J MEETINGS The Park Commission shall hold regular meetings on the first and
third Thursdays of each month. The Commission may hold as many additional
meetings per month as the City Councilor Park Commission may deem necessary.
The Commission shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall
keep a record of its resolutions, transactions and findings.
1.4 The Commission shall study and advise the City Council concerning City parks
and recreation programs.
1.5 The Commission is responsible to the City Council for all property and
programs relating to parks and recreation. The Commission shall be
responsible for coordinating maintenance, improvements, upkeep and
operation of all City parks.
1.6 Fees and deposits shall be reviewed by the Commission on an annual
basis and a recommendation made to the City Council.
COMMUNITY
IV. ANALYSIS OF SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES OF PARK DEDICATION FEES
Andover
o
* Blain.
Brooklyn PlIIrk
. Champlin
* Coon Rapids
RESIDENTIAL
Land Dedicationl
10~ of grQSs l~nd areal
0-3 units/Acro
12~ of grosR areal
4 units/acre
5 un! t sl act~e
and 90 on or for lots
up to ::$ 4ct"es.
Cash Dedicationl
10~ of market value
COMMERCIAL
10~ of gro.~ ar~a
Q~ 10% of market value
'. -
$390/alngl. ~.m11y uni~ 3~ o~ th. ~.tr M~rk.t
.33S/dupl_x unl~ v_Iu. in land or money.
S293/townhouae unit
S24B/multl-famlly unit
.305/mobilo home unit
Land dedication based on unit densitYI
0-1 unite/acre 5~ of land
2-3 units/acre 10~ of land
4-5 units/acre 12~ Of land
6-7 units/acre 14~ of land
8-12 units/acre 16~ of land
13-16 units/acre lB~ of land
Each unit over 16 unitn/acre
is an additional O.S~
10~ of fair markot value
10~ of groms land Area
10~ of gross area or
$1400/s1ngle family Acre
S2S00/medium density .ere
Cashl
Single family
Duplex
Townhouse/Quads
Mobile Homes
Mul tiples
$3S4/dw.
$326/d....
$?B6/d....
$2911 dw.
$2381 dw.
',Init
unit
unit
unit
unit
4~ of fair m~rket value
10~ of gross area or
t:4:;00/.acre
3~ of fair Market value _
not to exceed Slt52/acre.
INDUSTRIAL
DATE OF
LATEST
REVISION
10~ of gro~~ draa
or 10% of market value
1979
3~ of th. fAir m.rk.~
VAlu. in land or Money.>
1986
4~ of fair market value
1973
10~ of gross area or
$4:5001<<cre
1989
5~ of fair market value _
not to eHceed $1152/acre.
1984
Land-only at City's agreement. 3~ of land 5" of land
0-1 units/acre 5~ of land
2-3 units/acre 10~ of land
4-5 units/acre l2~ of land
> 6-7 units/acre 14~ of land
B-12 units/acre 16~ of land
13-16 units/acre IB~ of land
Each additional unit
per acre . 5~ of land
Eagan
Eden Prairie
Elk Rivor
Ham La.ke
* Lakevi!le
o.
Single Family
Duplex
TownholJse/Qt..tad
Apartment/MYlt1ple
Fees are to be paid
of final plat.
$Sc:S/unit
$/fS9/tJni t
$4l-4/unlt
$427/unit
at the time
Single Family $7Z0/un1t
Multiple Family $720/unit
$3S0/unit or 10~ of gross land area
$140 lac~e or 10~ of gross
land area
$5S0/unit or land
dedication based on density
10~ 0 -2.5 un. lac.
11" 2.5+ -4.0 un./ac.
13~ 4.0+ -6.0 un. lac.
15" 6.0+ -B.O un. lac.
17" B.O+ -10.0 un. lac.
17-20" 10.0+ un. lac.
Plus '$150/un. for multi-
purpose trail $Y5tem~
$.05/sq. ft. based on net
developable land
t.::::S60/Mocro
$c:500/a.cre 0)" 10"
of gl'OSS a."ea
$.OS/sq. ft. based on net
developable land
1989
$2:se;.0/acre
1989
1989
1989
1988
Maple Gt~ove
Oak Grove
o
Ramsey
St. Franeis
Woodbury
o
$518/unit or 10~ of land area
7~ of gross land area.
$SO/uni~ O~ 10~ of the fair
Ma~ket value, whichever
is greater.
10~ of gross area.
lQY. of the fair market
value or $500 per dwelling
unit created, whichever is
greater.
10Y. of gt~O$S land area or
cash in lieu of land equal
to 10~ of the assessed market
value or $~OO per lot
whichever is ,greater.
Singl. Family 10~ of fair
market value/lot - not
to exceed $450/1ot
Multiple family IOY. of. fatr
market value/lot - not
to exceed $350/1ot
$ZSZO/aere or 7-12~
of land area
$16S0/acre
(Currently updating park dedication fees)
5~ of gross area.
10~ of fair market v.lue of
land - not to exceed $1300
per acre
10~ of fair market value of
land'- not to exceed $1200
per acre
*'Researched by Westwood Development (others researched by city staff).
1989
1978
1988
1987
o
~
00
00
'"
......
"-
00
'"
......
".:
o
m
,,>.::>
o...~
~""
. .p :J :>
"0
u tJ...
~ ..
..,,,'"
"0 S.
Q ..
":E:
"'..
s..."
...."
0. (Q ...
.oJ
..,..' (1)1
~.:: II ~~
IU I'G~ <<:Sri")
a.:>-o .
s: .......N
O~r-I.
_.:0:: $,.'
...s. 0
....
~:E:
"s. VI
..~ OJ
0111 t;
.::.:b..lltO
s.. C ::Sl..n
~O"'O .
'"
......
"
OS: 11 CU
-O...,Vlals..
'=':.p lQ.., U (.J
;~~z"5S:fa
a.;~~;a.;
.. '" 0.
Q
"
a. d 0
.. ~
........
.co ..
u" u
s. ~.
:J)( "0 .
0. a.
..... BQ
......:Je..
::>s.s.
...Q.A1
-o~ ll.
OJ
VI>. II>
~~"2.::
t,f);t... ..
",O..J :>-
<cO'
...
~
"
::>
s.
a.
a.
'"
...
"
"
s.'
..
a.
o
M
~)
..
"
...
M
..
... ...
.~ ...
" "
" "
s. s.
.. ..
a. a.
go. g
M M
.. ..
...
-;:
"
s.
..
a.
....
o
CO
..
...
...
"
",
I-
..
a.
o
CO
....
..
...
...
"
"
1-',
..
a.
o
CO
~
...
...
"
"
'I-
..
,a.
M
CO
....
..
o
(\J
M
~
0"
(\J
0,
..;
'0
;~ If)
'M
..;
000 0
000 0
o 0 ,... .q-
ai no':
o
o
...
~
M
o
o
o'
r.:
-'
o
o
M
ar
,..
o
o
~J
,..j
.t'>
OeO
0.0;
1\1,';'",
o ,..j
... '...
"':;.
... .....,:"...... (U
8 ':~:8. ;:"8, e. g
1.1<:1/1
~J M..,':..:t,...
! :';.~.t~i'7 ~..!
'I' .. '1';;,;'1' "'. '1"
~ ~{~~:~ "~'f~f
I 1''''1. I
~);~:;l:~::"~
.'.,......
II)
~
-
<<S
s..
l-
s..
(I)
.0
e
t=.
111-0
~ s..
'0
u
'OJ
""
...
-;:
"
1.
"
a.
'II>
'"
...
..
l.O ... ~
CO !::;,~
0' 0
o 0
o ~J
(II .;
.. M
0'
o
'0
'.
o
(~
...
.~
"
"
1.
..
a.
(\J
...
...
..
...
...
"
"
s.
..
a.
'"
(~
t.)
..
...
~
"
"
S.
01
a.
(~
,,)
"
..
.u ~,..u
... ~ ...
" " "
=' ::II :J
I- 's. S.
01 ell (!f.
a. a.. 0-
CO ... ...
~J ... o::t"
... '" ......
.. .. ..
o 0
o 0
(II, 0
..; iii
... \II
o
0,
o
o
II>
o 0, 0
o o. 0
o '0 0
r: .:t' 0
o .... <0
-.
a:
...
~
"
"
s.,
..
a.
00
...
..
-I-'~. oIJo. .p
... ... ...
" " "
::> " "
S. S. S.
QI. at at
0; CL a.
'" ll) M
... II> M
- r., M'
~ .. $.
..., ..~
... ...
... .~
" "
" "
s. s.
.. ..
a. a.
(Y) (Y)
U') U')
.. l/>
...
'"
"
s.
..
a.
<0
M
M
..
... ... ...
... ... ...
C. $:- s:
~ :J :;j
s.
..
a.
s.
..
a.
s.
..
a.
'"
<Xl.
..
..
....
II>
..
..
....
...
..
M
'"
M
II>
,.,
~
0) CO 0
N CO (II
~J ......
o
o
o
.;
o '0 0
.. '" 0
<0 l\J '"
,.; Iii ~
o
o
'1
...
M
000
000
<lI" to) ,...
... ,.: CO
... M ...
o 0'
0'0
.. '"
t$ tS
<0 I/)
o
o
o
.
'"
....
a: :;) a: a:" a: :;), :;)
<'
I/)
(~
0:
~J
o I/)
o (\J
..i' <'Ii
<0 N
~J
o
o
1
.. '
...'
I'
...
N
"
1\1
'i'
(\J
-.'.
...
o
o
o
I.,
...
....
, 1
...
. CU :
1 '
1\1
'M
I
'"
N
-0
S-
O
U
OJ
""
4-
o
+'
o
-l
(I)'
.><
<<S
-l
s..'
(I)
-0 .><
S- C
o :::>
U a>
OJ
"" ....
o
4-
o
+'
.3 :c
en ...
0, en
ol qj
'1 N
o Ol~
o 0 (Y)
o <=> U;;
.:t -It' N
...
...
t'>
,.:
(~
S ~i
? ?
~ ::
,I '..,I
... ...
,1\1 N
I,. I
(\I' N
flJ',' J'l
I,'" I
11>' (\I
M, (\J
..
o
o
o
J.
,...
"I
...
N
,
~J
M
1
',Q
(\I
-,
o
o
0'
,!,
...
I
...
(\I"
1
(\J
.)
1
'"
(\J
II
.. ...
M M
,I ,.
... ...
(\I (\I,
1 I
N III
'i' 'I
'" <0
..N N,
en
,~
~
-0 -0
's.. S-
O 0
U U
OJ OJ
."" ""
4- 4-
o 0
+' +'
o 0,
-...J -I.
VI VI
OJ OJ
"+Jl ~
<<S <<S
.... +'
-0 III III
s,., I.aJ 1.aJ
o
(,)'>,. >,
OJ C C
"" 0 0
~ '0 '0
o. u Co.)
~ "0 "'C
o .....' .....
....:.J 'C?"~" C
..
"
::>
s.
8.
"-
"-
..
~
\)
~
~
CO
~
o
,.)
"
r.:
o
o
~
...
00
o 0
l'lU')
.:'"
.... ::g
-l
~
0,
I-
'~'.I..,'
, ,'-I)
~,
II
i
-,
.n
:':
!;:
~
.)
rtl
x
<;;I
~
\)
,~
-=n
.m
,. ,
'- ' C'
~' .~ ~.
~ ~. ~
.~ 1 :'~
~ ~.....
1 ~ ~
u.. I -:s
~ V7
c c
o 0
or- 'r-
+' +'
:;
-0
CC,
..c:
+'
'"'
c
o
+'
VI.
Ctl,
~.: C
<<S 0
~ 'r-"
V), ~.
LLJ..r- .11) .~
.""0 (1)'+0)
s::::: C "'C"+J lC)'
~ ~ c::C;~',s...
So.. s..."O V) .0
:O)OlCLLJC
s... s... N tC
(UW ~:E
>>4-c
LLJL1J4-o
:::>
V1U'Jr-O
00 U
-0 -0
C s::: ~ ""0 ""0
.3 3. ~ 5 ~
,,~
,-0
'-0
<C
~
,'ri; :;:
,s- :J:
1-, '"
o
VI
.>< '
'",
o
s..
OJ ~
...c <n ""0
E c 0
,~ ~
'"
:::>
+',
u' :1
{? . ;>
OJ
..c:
+'
OJ
S-
OJ
..c:,'
3:.;' I;'
00,
00;
'"
......
s..'
o
"-
00
'"
......
'VI
'il>
"'+J
.'td
+'
VI
:LiJ
OJ
.>< ,
<<S'VI
....J '<11
VI +'
OJ ~ .ra
+J CV ,;..)......
rtl~ v)"c
~. C 'r;;u ""0
"':::> CC
UJ 00
OJ
"0''''0 4-
'~.g .9
~E~
Q) 'IV......
s... 'OJ
t.:?C:I:
c
.~
VI
OJ
....
"."t'CI
'+'
'VI
....LLJ.
c
OJ
>'
<<S
..c:
.:.t:;:
OJ'
OJ,
s..'
u,
.g .,....
+' .~
Ol 0
C . . V)
'1'-'..... -
. <A "'
,C U
~'8
.><
U, (/) Q,)
OJ
S-
U
-0
C
<<S
c
o
+'
:'r-
3
.~
+'
.~
-0
'"
<C
'-0
s..
(Y)
II)
'OJ
+/
'<<S
+'
VI
clorJ
0'-
.~
+'
"
o
o
VI. Park Dedication Formula as recommended by Westwood Planning
and Engineering and utilized by several cities.
URBAN
$ Dedication/du = Total Actual Purchase Price X 10%
Total Acres X 2.314 units/acre
RURAL
$Dedication/du = Total Actual Purchase Price X 2.5 X 10%
Total Acres
du = dwelling unit
~ :
VII. Analysis of Formula to determine Park Dedication Fees.
o
URBAN
$ Dedication/du = Total Actual Purchase Price X 10%
Total Acres X 2.314 units/acre
= $859,000 X 10%
426.32 acres X 2.314
= $871.26 X 10%
du
= $87.00/du
RURAL
$ Dedication/du = Total Actual Purchase Price X 2.5 X 10%
Total Acres
= $859,500 X 2.5 acres/du X 10%
426.32 acres
= $2,016.09 X 2.5 acres/du X 10%
acres
= $504.00/du
* du = dwelling unit
o
VIII.
o
o
Recommended formula to determine park dedication fee.
$ Dedication/du = Total actual purchase price X 2.314 X 10%
Total acres
= $859,500 X 2.314 X 10%
426.32 acres
= $466.00/du
* du = dwelling unit
IX. Final Recommendation for Andover's Park Dedication Fees.
o
A. Residential Developments
$466/Single Family unit
$398/Two Family Unit (85.5% of $466)
$349/Townhouse (75% of $466)
$293/Multi-Family Unit (63% of $466)
$363/Mobile Home Unit (78% of $466)
,
** or equal value in land **
B. Commercial Properties
$1078 per acre
Note: This ordinance amendment will only apply to new plats
and plats that have not had a final plat approved.
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 10
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 10 is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 9. SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS
9.07 Parks, Playgrounds, Open Space.
9.07.5 Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands. In those
instances where a cash contribution is to b~ made by the owners
or developers in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land for
park, playground, open space, or public use purposes, the Park
and Recreation Commission shall recommend to the City Council ~Ae-
ameaA~-e~-easA-sa~e-€emm~ss~eA-~ee~s-sAea~e-ee-eeA~r~ea~ee a
park dedication fee as follows:
Residential
$466/Single Family Unit
$398/Two-Family Unit
$349/Townhouse Unit
$293/Kulti-Family Unit.
$363/Kobile Home Unit
Or ten (10) percent of the fair market value of the
land, whichever is greater.
Commercial
$1,078/Industrial Acre
It shall
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of , 1988.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
Analysis of other communities as determined by Westwood
Planning & Engineering and city staff.
** This is how Andover ranks using current park
dedication fees.
CITY
1. Eden prairie
2. Lakeville
3. Champlin
4. Eagan
5. Maple Grove
6. Ramsey
DEDICATION PER DU
$720
$700
$605
$525
$518
$500 or 10% of fair
market value whichever
is greater
7. woodbury
$450 or 10% of fair
market value not
to exceed $450
8. Blaine
$395
$384
$350
$350
9. Coon Rapids
10. Elk River
11. Ham Lake
12. St. Francis
$200 or 10% of assessed
market value whichever
is 'greater
13. Andover
10% of market value
14. Brooklyn Park
15. Oak Grove
10% of fair market value
$ 50 or 10% of fair market
value whichever is
greater
o
Final ranking as determined by the Park and Recreation
Commission if approved by the City Council.
o
CITY
DEDICATION PER DU
3. Champlin
4. Eagan
5. Maple Grove
$720
$700
$605
$525
$518
1. Eden prairie
2. Lakeville
6. Ramsey
$500 or 10% of fair
market value whichever
is greater
7. Andover
$466
8. Woodbury
$450 or 10% of fair
market value not
to exceed $450
9. Blaine
$395
$384
$350
$350
10. Coon Rapids
11. Elk River
12. Ham Lake
13. st. Francis
$200 or 10% of assessed
market value whichever
is greater
14. Brooklyn Park
15. Oak Grove
10% of fair market value
$ 50 or 10% of fair market
value whichever is
greater
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE March 2. 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~~
FOR
ITEM 11 .
NQ Nordeen Special
Use Permit
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to review and approve the Special
Use Permit to mine dirt as required per Ordinance 8 Section 5.03
(A) and Section 4.24 as requested by Gordon Nordeen.
Since the spring of 1988 the City of Andover has been strictly
enforcing property owners and contractors that are actively mining
dirt, to obtain the necessary permits from the local, state and
federal governments.
During 1988, observation was made by city staff that Mr. Nordeen
has been mining and removing dirt from the site. Mr. Nordeen has
been mining dirt on this property since about the year 1960
without an amended Special Use Permit. Because the operation was
in existence prior to the adoption of this ordinance (Ordinance 8
adopted 1971), Mr. Nordeen is required to obtain an amended
Special Use Permit because there have been structural alterations
and enlargements of the operation.
Mr. Nordeen's operation is the source of his income and the
operation occurs mostly during the construction season.
The city staff has reviewed the application and their comments are
as follows:
A. The applicant is proposing to mine the area in green over the
next few years. See attached drawing. The area in yellow has
been excavated.
B. The applicant is requested to make reasonable use of the
property.
C. Safety precautions are to be taken at the end of each working
day to prevent injury to playing children, bike riders,
snowmobilers, etc.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
Page Two
Nordeen Special Use Permit
D. The applicant is required to restore the banks of the mined
area after the area has been excavated using an approved topsoil,
seed, and/or vegetation or brush to establish erosion control.
E. The applicant shall provide the City of Andover with a
security bond to hold the City harmless against road damage and
for restoration of the site as determined by City Engineer.
F. Signs to be placed on both sides of the driveway at prairie
Road (haul road) indicating trucks hauling.
G. Watering of the haul road to control dust during dry times.
H. Hauling of material is Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to
7:00 P.M. and Saturdays 8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.
Note: Mr. Nordeen has been working with the Coon Creek Watershed
District to establish the site as a possible regional ponding
area. Mr. Nordeen has been in contact with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the Department of Natural Resources. Attached are
letters from both agencies.
Staff recommends approval of the amended Special Use Permit.
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
o
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY GORDON
NORDEEN TO MINE SOIL FROM THE PROPERTY AT 15357 PRAIRIE ROAD NW AS
REQUIRED PER ORDINANCE 8 SECTION 5.03 (A) AND SECTION 4.24.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice, the Planning and
zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and reviewed the
request of Gordon Nordeen to mine soil from the property at 15357
prairie Road NW.
WHEREAS, the Special Use Permit has been reviewed by the City
Engineer: and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
andover to hereby approve the Special Use Permit for Gordon Nordeen
with the following conditions:
1. Safety precautions be taken at the end of each working day to
prevent injury to playing children, bike riders, snowmobilers,
etc.
2. The applicant shall provide the City with a security bond to hold
harmless against road damage and for restoration of the site as
determined by City Engineer.
3. Signs be placed on both sides of any of the driveway at prairie
Road (haul road).
4. The applicant is requested to make reasonable use of the property
without altering the topography greatly.
5. watering of the haul road to control dust.
6. Hauling of material is Monday through Friday, 7:30 A.M. to 4:30
P.M. and Saturday from 8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.
7. The applicant is required to restore the banks of the mined area
after the area has been excavated using an approved topsoil, seed,
and/or vegetation or brush to establish erosion control.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 7th day of
March, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
o
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
REPLY TO
AnENTION OF
January 24, 1989
-.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ST. PAUL DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
1135 u.s. POST OFFICE & CUSTOM HOUSE
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 5510H479
Construction-Operations (89-1245N-92)
Regulatory Branch
SUBJECT: Placement of Fill (Stockpiling) for
Unnamed Wetland, City of Andover, S 1/2 NW
Anoka County, Minnesota
a Black Dirt Operation, in an
24, T. 32 N., R. 24 W.,
Dear Mr. Nordeen;
.-
Gordon Nordeen
15357 Prairie Road Northwest
Anoka, Minnesota 55304
We have reviewed the information provided us about your project. Because
the stockpile site covers less than an acre and because your black dirt
operation requires no other fill in wetlands, the work is 'authorized by a
nationwide Department of the Army permit, provided the enclosed conditions and
management practices are followed.
This determination covers only the project referenced above. If the
design, location, or purpose of the work changes, you should contact us to
make sure the work would not result in ,a violation of Federal law. Our
telephone number is (612) 220-0375.
It is your responsibility to insure that the work complies with the terms
of this letter and the enclosures. IT IS ALSO YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN
ALL REQUIRED STATE PERMITS AND APPROVALS BEFORE YOU PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT.
THIS NATIONWIDE PERMIT AUTHORIZATION IS CONTINGENT UPON STATE APPROVAL.
If you have any questions, please call Joe Yanta at (612) 220-0362.
Enclosures
1. Regional conditions
2. Practices and conditions,
Determination: 330.5(a)(26)(i) - Less than an acre of fill in a wetland
adjacent to a headwaters stream.
o
-;
o
'~ ~ Speed Letter~ ".. '.'~
To or; A/dYJ~ From J~hn L 5:Je
16B57 f'~/i,~ ~ MW zN"e-Av~ ;L7~~r
Arw?~~ ,J2,?N 553a~ :2"1?-7~.;l~
,
Subject p~ /U, "'v7.;;(!f' l ~ 24-/ r32~ p ?~W' ~ f ~V'
. HI) 1110FQLD
MESSAGE
Jk.TAJ-f!- cLJt~-L~.uJ',1 PlX-V' ~ p~' ~ l>/V',e ~ c;:/'~
I · ,". . /
..., . ~' .'
~
(;) 4--73 - '~';L4 ,t{..~.
,~ (~~ FPI} ~ A..lCJ-Og~d/)~ rI...-h.J4"~- .\.
I'~kftu-r ~" ~r ~ 4/~Sigrp<f'r~(/t ; ~ ~ ~
~Ie c.a-Lfl ~ '/ 7'oVL'~,'~~
o
;",'.'::'
.'.....'FOlO
_t~'Il<HOLO
WilsonJones
GRAYLlNE FORM 44.902 3.PART
Co 1983. PRINTED IN U.S A.
, RECIPIENT-RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY
, 88
o
.,...
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. -ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 -(612) 755-5100
.-
CITY OF ANPOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
The City of Andover Planning' and zoning Commission will hold a
public hearing at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, February 14, 1989 at the
Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Bo~levard NW, Andover, MN to
consider the request of Gordon Nordeen forcan amended Special Use
Permit to mine dirt from the property described approximately as
that part of the Southwest 1/4 of ,the Northwest Quarter of
Section 24, and the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest Quarter of
section 24, Township 32, Range 24,>~noka CouIlty, Minnesota.
All opponents and proponents of said special
heard at the above time and location.
'pUb
V1ctor1a Volk - City Clerk
o
." . :'.:' ""-:""
~ .--........ . ..,:...,'..;..'....; '",-~,' ~.'
~:;::7.f~~~:= ...5,:j,~;.:~;:~;i'~:ii;':).;;~~~~~ii?~h1\~j,.;:0:~ti~~{~~'; ·
;,';~;t~~Edj(B usk.. PERMri~REauEst.l~haM1;;"'1~~r
;~,",. ;.,~,:tf;~ti'::~;,i:':.:,:::',: ,.,)0,:>;""", " .:"")",,,,' . >;"i':' ';;:;";~,'..':."i; :;.';i.};:/'~':~\;:> .?;; '" ,::':~':;''!.'i'~:;:,''",,~'~,:i.tl:'i!(':''':?~.i#:''';:i'i? ,::':,';
~:f~~t~~i;i~;rii}~t~~~;~~~l~~t~~it":,~!i~;~'i~i~1;~~~;G0,~'t~~:t"
',</.> Lot I':': Block Addi ti~1l. ,'" , - ' ,.
..;' .
. .'.; 'I' ....-
".',J plat
",
Parcel
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete
Reason for Request Fr men J e..d Sf e c ,~ I
legal) ,
tJ. [, -e.
Perm',1 ~/h"n~)
"
Section of ordinance'g,~ e\:, (id/'l1:J<fcur rent zoning' R- J
5 , ~j)(" Fa. 1'''1' /1/
/
**********************************************************************
~, t'OJ/
Name, of Applicant ,'~ 0.... An h
Address IS ~<==) tJ~P I'^O- i rl:-(J
Home Phone ~-," So 'I
Signature ~ . , A'lJr"f2... #'\./"
No rdeen
f? J .r> /\J., a), /l nd tJ V e yo
Business Phone'> l/- 3tJ.. 53'} C.
I
Date 1-.25- .19
**********************************************************************
property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home phone
Business phone'
Signature
**********************************************************************
. '
Attach a scaled drawing of the' property and structurea affected
s~owing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
o~tr~eh;>~nd locatio~ an,d,us,e; of,ex.i~M;~~,;,~;ru~,~~res: within 100 feet.
, The names and addresses of all property owners ,within 350 feet of the
subject property must also be pr~ded,~:."", ' .
li i ~ 'tJ .JJ5!5 ,',' " ,
App c~.t on Fee: '" ~~~o :;. Date:::p~id>V&bl~~~~i~t
Fil~,n9 Fee: $10.00'" ';T:";,:.:\'
I ;;Z 19/,-/
'. ,
'~',
'r
CITY of ANDOVER
;.
~ '. .0- 0
... ,.. ../,......
.' r..
APPLICATION FOR LAND RECLAMATION,
~,
~ q-5f'l
- )- P1
OR SOIL PROCESSING
Permit Fee
Receipt i
Date paid
Permit No.
The undersigned hereby makes application for,a permit for the
excavation, removal or grading of rock, sand,dirti gravel, clay
and other like material within the city of 'Andover, agreeing to
do a1.l work in strict complianc.e with City Ordinances and ,hereby
declares that all the facts and representations ,stated in this
application are true and correct.."...,;:,.
Applicant Go y~O Jo"\ 'rJ 0 y J t" Co n .Telephone ij.:i'~'S".39 (,..
Address 15351 rY'a.it'I't' (?J. rv:uJ, ,,"
,-
'Owner of Land
Tel~phone
Address
The correct legal description of the premises where:
PIN i 2'1.-,z-24'i<l 'DDD/~he removal or excavation of' rock, sand, di rt,
gravel, clay'oro~her likei.ll\aterials shall or
does occur, or, ,.' .,:""
, i"'; "-.
PIN i ,(AI-1~
the storage or disposition of rock, sand, dirt,
gravel"clay or other like materials shall or
does occur, or \0;',\,"
:;<;~'~:~,~ '-.;
PIN i O,I-1c.
grading of rock,"sand, dirt, gravel, clay or
other like mate~J.~ls shall,?r does, occur.
Estimated time schedule of intermediate operationsoj1the b
removal, storage or excavation rv'\ ().....,. v h-t'n 'c <.t rv 0 ve m ,f,' r.
Estimated date of completion of theabove~~eration '/9 qc;
o
~taJ;.,.e{)..me~t of purpose for removal, storage pr excavation
U' O~ \ Y :!;tJ t.l V' c... e () t=' InC"..o Yn ~ '., c., '
Complete list of highways, streets or other public ways within
the City upon and along which the materials excavated or removed
s1j:;~l be transp~yed iOl1 '" 'LJ ." I " '
~c=Jd~ t'.'"' '-r l~. I~ (;, ,I(t(. ..{~(j ,~, 'f-_.L1. ,n N () J e ('
:~;
~" , .:::~:' ".': .; :.; '.
..P'
,
"
. '
...' .
'--"
.r;.- ..
."
o
perso9Jl re~ponsib~EJ fOlj actual operation of the site
G"o 'f" ,60'" fVdY" 6e en
Type ~f Equ~pment J ra. ~ I, h 'f; Ira., ~..,I(/a.jeYs. -rr {,(.c-'~
Map or pl~t showing the following five (5) i,tems (may bean same
map):;>',',,"
~1. The existing land elevations and water table elevations
based on sea level readings.
The proposed pit or excavation to be made showing the
confines or limits thereof together with the proposed
finished elevations (side slopes n()t, to exceed 4:1)
based on sea level readings. "
3. Present zoning and land use (parcel and within 350' of
affected property). ,.',
',<,', I
.~
2.
4. ,proposed zoning and land use (if change is desired). Nt>II/i:.
5. Scale to the nearest .10 feet, north arrow, and existing
street names.
Surety or Security Bond, in such form and sum asset by Council
'Resolution" running to the City, conditione~':,topay"the,City the
cost and expense of: ' . "';','
a. Repairing any highways, streets, or other public ways
within the city made necessar~ by the special burden
resulting from hauling ,and transporting thereon by the
applicant, the amount ~f such cost to be determined by
the city council; and conditioned further to save the
city free and harmless from any and all suits or claims
for damages resulting from the negligent excavation,
removal or storage of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay or
other like material within the City
Renovating the site to an approved land use in the event
of revocation of said permit by either party.
Applicant is required to furnish certificates of insurance to the
city in the amounts of at least $100,000.00 bodily injury
liability per person; $300,000.00 per person for injuries or
death arising from anyone occurrence; and $50,000.00 property
~amage liability for anyone occur r,~nce ./',
b.
shall be
o
Describe precauti~ns to be t;,I...... tu~VO.hl f'",ren}ing nuisances or ,
hazards to public health and ji'a..h:.t~. ,",i;\ ' , '
N~ -!ress pa..SS/rJj 5/1h.S r; bf"p/a cccl "-VIJv..l'\j~/l()f':
b ~n do. to I; ....
... :: ,-;~...
.. . ~ ..
,
.'
o
Applicant shall post at said site a
and a copy of ~he Resolution of the
o
,I
.'
23, 32, "'24 14 0001
Harold L & Mary F sullivan
15300 prairie Rd. NW
Andov,er ,'MN 55304
2'-2 24 12 0002
Kenneth L & Mary Ann Slyzuk
14124 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
, '
23 32 24 14 0004m',(S,C23 32 24 14 0012
John & Barbara BaJ1ey, J,;~':: DiTornquil3~ &
15380 prairie Rd.3NW .., :);,.P Stoffel'
Anoka, MN 55304dt~'),;!;;,)i;; 836154th'LaneNW
:;;$:\',' ,...' , ,%"yF" Andover';KMN.'; 55304
'.; i)': ': '\ . . '. . ;:';~~~::;~1;:tt-,(~\:::' -,!;_:" , "",:",:,;(W'i'(:;,~~~;::?,-' i.,-' ~
24 32 24 13 oool~ir" ':;;1.:;.';24'32'24'21 0017 ',.
Robert H. Sehroer'~0Miehael~J Knoll &
7620 Univ. Ave. NE "{cniJ Karpen'
Fridley, MN 55432 'E";\'1D539 155th Ave. NW
i;Anoka, " MN ." 55304
':ff:;"-;:";~>':-' -i\;r;:'s:.:;-{i,~'~;" 'j'
24 32 24 21 0034
Gregory A & Caro~yn
15501 Juniper NW"
Andover, MN 55304
.--
24 32 24 21 0018
Robert H & Judith F
535 155th Ave. NW
Andover, MN' 55304
24 32 24 21
Joseph C & Shi
517 155th Ave.
Anoka, MN 553
;':;-x:?,\;!~:;:,';,
24 32 24 21 0033
R A' Miller Inc.
Rural Rt 4 Lot 3
North Ryan Lake Rd.
Isanti, MN 55040
24 32 24.21 0040 '
Beekli!,;[<'RobertP & Jane M Berndt
;~~i';(;ti~15515 Kumquat NW
!/){.'Andove MN 55304
;;';:':;
',{<-:"
>:: ,.~~i~/, '.'
(, t.'-,:.,~
24 32 24 21 0041
Guy N & Jeanne'M Naslund
445 155th Ave. NW
Andover, MN 55304
24 32 24
,Donald &
Rt 1 Box
Wyoming,
21 0042' " "':'~,<24' 32 24 22 0014
LOuis!!,)6~.;".Handl:!~.~.c1tFrank' L & Anna 'E Malmi
19'; .r",'""., I;'; . ", 6 3 7 155 th Ave. NW
MN 550,92 "i\Anoka,MN 55304
\,:~c:~t:;::'" ,:_;.J:':.)!)~f;.i?~,g!.;,,-' ", -.: -,-,.-' ;:/,,~>:. .~'
24 32 24 23 0002/t'i;;;:',d:!;.24 3224 23 0003
R D Hacken & MiMeNeil ,'" Bernard E & Marlys
610 155th Ave. '.'. NW , Grandy
Andover; MN 55313128Baltimore st NE
.~laine,. .MN 55434
:}'-l: ::
~' ./ .
24 32 24 23 0001
C J & S Moe
610 155th Ave. NW
Andover, MN 55304
24 32 24 24 0007
Byron E & D K Gardner
5lJ...155th Ave NW
AV' MN 55304
.;",24' 3224 23 0006
;;;.;i;'.Elizabeth J Gottwaldt
l;rjig[.'15313 prairie Rd NW
,~." . 'Anoka, MN 55304
~,{ /;::;:_, \_. "~ J c;
24 32 24 23 0004
Leslie & Henry Johanson
15451 Prairie Road NW
Anoka, MN 55304
24 32 24 23 0007
Alden K & Judy A Riley
566 l55th Ave. NW
Anoka, MN 55304
0003
In Trust
:::':,
24 32 2424 0004
William A Bossert
5601 Dewey Hill Rd.
Edina, MN 55435
.,."..(.1'2432 24 24 0006
!;.\pt:~'iLMadeline K. Hoppman
, , '~,500 l55th Ave. NW
JAnoka"MN 55304
',- -. - ' ::-';',;>; - ,
24 32 24 24 000
Thomas S Robe
530 155th Ave.
Andove r, MN
24 24 0009
& Sheryl Heisinger
Ave,. NW
55304
24. 32...z4 24 0010
Michael J,Emmons
558 155th.Ave.
Andover,:MN 553
2~2' 2~ii\2 0001
Winslow I Ho1asek
1159 Andover Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
o
\W'.".. 'a\')I.\fl
,O\.~ '1,
~,~.~ .n ~~\
fl"'''. ...
~ \Uttt. ',)\1.'3 ~\~
\~tll~~'3'3\')'\\)\"
~\''3i~ '"
\,),')'t\\t \\\1\ \Ut.~
\O\1')'1Il .-
I'
!~.
."
GO.rdon Nordeen
15357 prairie Road
Andover, MN 55304
.....
.- .;".<t;h;r
::,if,i\,\,:",,;:,.il,i,:.;~~
. . :",/';,
An inspection has been made of your~property)anditY~oes appear
that over 400 cubic yards of material (sand," gravel;;' peat, etc.)
have been removed from your property.. ordinance8,~section 4.24
Mining, requires a Special UseP,EH,~i,~,;to~opdW:t sugn,activity.
- . ..::';>:" . '. -< ':-;r!;~~l~~;"'!-:_(':":;"<-"'f ;.;:;~*::~-r~,~,~~<J\?,>' >?/;
Removal of any additional materia~aftei rece
will constitute'a violation of
NW
Re:
Mining
Dear Mr. Nordeen:
. ,i';::.{,-~
6 !1"~flb^
If you have any ,questions,
Sincerely,
CITY OF ANDOVER
'-1~/~
Todd J. Haas
Assistant City Engineer
TJH:kmt
Certified Mail Receipt iP 012
1'<:,,,,,-,'1' "t,pl, CAr. 'd ,.
o
I
'.. , ,.. -,,",',",'
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
March 7, 1989
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
Jay Blake, Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGEN
ITEM Ordinance 87
NO, Amendment
BY:
BY:
The Andover City Council is requested to review the enclosed
Ordinance #87 Amendment. Deputy Sheriff Albertson, while
explaining the Ordinance to a resident, found that Section 3,
Subsection D of Ordinance #87 was not entirely clear. He felt
that a change in the wording would make it easier to explain the
intent of that section to residents. The change would also make
this section consistent with the wording of the other sections of
the Ordinance.
The proposed amendment would not change the intent of the
Ordinance. Snowmobiles would still be allowed to travel on the
righthand-most portion of the roadway in the absence of an
improved ditch.
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission reviewed the proposed
amendment on February 14, 1989 and has unanimously recommended
approval.
please review the enclosed Ordinance amendment.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 87
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR THE OPERATION OF ALL-
TERRAIN VEHICLES AND SNOWMOBILES WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
SECTION 3. OPERATION ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
D. -eR-~i~A~-ei-way-aesi~Ra~ea~ie~ No person shall operate a
snowmobile on City streets,.except,sRewmeei*es-sAa*~-ee-~e~mi~~ea-
eR*y on the shoulder of the roadway, or in the absence of an
improved shoulder, on the righthand-most portion of the roadway,
and in the same direction as the street traffic on the nearest
lane of the roadway adjacent thereto.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of , 1988.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission,
February 14, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Four
ORDINANCE 87 AMENDMENT
Jay Blake stated that Deputy Albertson requested a
clarification of Ordinance 87 (ATV/Snowmobile Ordinance), Section
3, Subsection D regarding the use of snowmobiles on City Streets.
Jay indicated that the amendment would not change the
intent, but would clarify it for ease of interpretation by the
deputies and. residents of Andover.
Commissioner Bernard agreed with this change, if it makes
the Deputy's jOb easier. Chairman Pease, agreed also and stated
that this amendment would be more clear.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Bernard, seconded by
Commissioner Spotts that the Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the change
as stated by Officer Albertson as an amendment to Ordinance 87,
Section 3 (D) Operation on Public Property. All voted yes.
Motion carried.
This item will go to the City Council on March 7th.
ORDINANCE 10. AMENDMENT REVISION
Jay Blake stated that the Building Insp$ctor was running
into prOblems with the wording of the Ordinance 10 Amendment,
Contiguous 39,000 Square Feet Buildable Land Area. Mr. Almgren
is now recommending that specified minimum depth and width
dimensions should be established as follows: a minimum width of
150 feet and a minimum depth of 150 feet be used. These changes
would apply to only the areas not served by sewer and water (2-
1/2 acre lots). The proposal would prevent any confusion with
future subdivisions by eliminating any room for
misinterpretations.
o
Becky Pease asked if this change would be for all districts.
Jay Blake stated this amendment would go in lots or areas laCking
municipal sanitary sewer within and outside the urban service
area.
Mr, Bernard asked about the 150 feet figure and the fact
that they don't add up to 39,000. He wondered why the City did
not prepare numbers that would, when multiplied, add up to the
39,000 square feet number. Mr. Blake stated that the requirement
would still be 39,000 square feet, but that the minimum width and
depth would be 150 feet. Mr. Bernard stated that if this change
, would assist the building inspector, that he had no problems with
"
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
March 7, 1989
ITEM
NO,
Discussion Items
13.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
BY: Jay Blat planner
Mediation Services
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
The Andover City Council is requested to review the proposed
allocation of funds to Mediation Services for Anoka County for
1989. They are requesting $650.00 from the City to cover
operating expenses. Initial investigation has found that the City
has funded this program in both 1987 and 1988 through the general
budget, although no funds were budgetted in 1988 or in 1989.
Money for Mediation Services would be available through the
Community Development Block Grant process. I would recommend that
the Council request Mediation Services to submit an application
for Public Service CDBG funds. The City's allocation would be
finalized in May and we expect that the application forms and
procedure would be completed in April.
Information regarding Mediation Services was included in your
packet from February 21, 1989.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
:1
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 7, 1989
ITEM 15.
NQ Permit/Integrated
Waste S stems
BY:
James E. Schrantz
OR
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The city Council is requested to review this item.
Background
The State of Minnesota, Department of Administration has signed a
contract with Integrated Waste Systems, in Buffalo, New York, for
Andover tire abatement.
Andy Ronchak of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is the Project
Manager (296-9773).
Bill Hawkins will review the contract before the meeting Tuesday.
At this time, we believe that the City is not a responsible party
as we are not the landowner or the agency in charge of the
contractor for the project. The hold harmless clause and
insurance in the MPCA's contract with IWS will cover this
operation.
We are concerned about noise, operating hours, security, final
clean up and that this operation is temporary.
Attached is a copy of the "written documentation" IWS submitted to
MPCA along with their bid.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
;.
."
.........................
.........................
.,.......................
.........................
.........................
........ ..m'.. .........
........... ............
.......... .r:..........
::::::..:t'... ::t::::::::
........ ...........
....... .........
::::::. .:::::::::
...... ..............
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.................... . ..
"
o
INTEGRATED WASTE SYSTEMS INC. I
State of Minnesota
Department of Administration
Materials Management Division
Room 112 Administration Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Attn: Mr. James Johnson
Re: Andover Tire Abatement Bid
Dear Mr. Johnson:
January 2, 1989
In accordance with the bid documents for the above referenced project,
Integrated Waste Systems, Inc. wishes to submit as the "written documentation"
the following information that all bid requirements can and will be met. This
information is presented in the following sections:
Section I
Section II
Section III
Section IV
Section V
Statement of Qualifications
Project Experience in Tire Pile Remediation
Project Staffing
Andover Tire Abatement Project Approach
Project' Schedule
In addition to this written documentation, we have submitted fully
executed, the required bid. Insurances will be provided if awarded the
contract to abate the Andover Tire pile.
We believe the enclosed info~mation is sufficient for your complete
evaluation of our proposal and the award, of this contract if our firm is the
low bidder.
AJG:kmg
enc.
o
6 Fountain Plaza
Buffalo, New York 14202
(716) 852-3402
. ,.. ''filll.otft''lf.l'I.vr....II'If'f'f
Sincerely,
I~r;(14::'
Albert J. ~~~~
Executive Vice Pr~ent
and General Manager
Inc.
,0
SECTION I
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
OrRanization and Contact Information
The company information is as follows:
Integrated Waste Systems, Inc.
Six Fountain Plaza
Buffalo, New York 14202
(716) 852-3402
Integrated Waste Systems, Inc. (IWS) operates a complete tire recycling
plant at 333 Ganson Street, Buffalo, New York 14203. This facility is the
only permitted facility in the State of New York capable of providing recycling
of waste tires that is environmentally acceptable to the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation.
The name of the individual who is to be contacted for all communication
regarding this RFQ is the following:
Albert J. Gilewicz
Executive Vice-President and Geneal Manager
c/o Integrated Waste Systems, Inc.
Six Fountain Plaza
Buffalo, New York 14202
(716) 852-3402
Company Profile
Integrated Waste Systems, Inc. is a company that was incorporated in May
of 1986 to pursue and develop business opportunities in all aspects of the
waste business. IWS is in the final'stages of negotiating transfer, haul and
disposal of residue-bypass-unprocessibles from various waste-to-energy facilities
in the Northeast U.S. IWS has also been awarded a five year contract for the
transfer, haul and disposal for the City of Buffalo, New York of 200,000
tons/year of MSW generated by the City residents.
There are also three (3) affiliated companies, all of which are owned by
Mr. Brian Swartzenberg, President of IWS, and all of which are involved in
some aspect of the waste business. One of these affiliates, Bear Development
Company, Inc. ("Bear") is currently developing a project in the Town of Ulster,
New York, which is a 1,200 ton per day RDF plant and waste-tire fuel plant,
along with an attendant ashfill. One of the most significant developments
currently underway by an IWS affiliate, Geostow, is a 5,000 acre site in
upstate New York that has outstanding geotechnical characteristics for use as
an underground non-hazardous waste depository. Another IWS affiliate,
Northeastern Waste Systems, Inc. is in the final stages of permitting of an
800 acre site in northeast Ohio for a 100 acre municipal solid waste landfill.
We have included informational brochures on these projects in Appendix A.
0'
o
As noted earlier, the IWS facility on Ganson Street is the only permitted
facility in the State of New York capable of providing complete tire recycling
capabilities that are environmentally acceptable to the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation. We have included a copy of this permit in
Appendix B. This facility serves over 600 waste tire generators daily, in
Western New York State. Also, IWS has been involved in over thirty (30) waste
tire pile clean-ups in New York State since August of 1987. We have included
in Section 2 of this submission, a list of tire pile clean-ups including those
of a size similar to that required by The State of Minnesota.
We do wish to highlight the tire pile remediation capability of IWS,
because it demonstrates our ability to efficiently mobilize manpower and
equipment to different field locations and perform the work within an agreed
upon schedule and budget. This ability has resulted in IWS's being awarded
three (3) very significant contracts, a 250,000 tire pile clean-up in the Town
of Marion, New York, a 500,000 tire pile clean-up in Putnam County, New York
State, and a 1.2 million tire pile clean-up in the City of Jacksonville,
Florida. To our knowledge these are the largest tire pile remediation projects
ever conducted in New York State, as well as in the country.
Experience with Similar Proiects
IWS owns three (3) Columbus McKinnon Rotary Sheer, low-speed/high torque
shredders capable of shredding tires into 2" X 2" chips at the rate of 1,000
(equivalent passenger) tires per hour. One shredder is stationary and is
operated at our tire recycling plant on Ganson Street where we serve over 600
customers and process 3,000 to 5.000 tires daily. The other two shredders are
identical in most aspects as our stationary unit, except that they are mounted
on heavy duty trailers for use on tire pile remediation projects.
We would venture to say that IWS is one of only a handful of Companies
throughout the United States that has experience in waste tire remediation
projects, along with experience in resolving significant waste problems in
general, '
We believe that our firm has the ability to complete the work required by
The State of Minnesota. We have already identified similarly sized tire pile
projects which we have successfully completed. on time and under budget. We
do wish to highlight the fact that there have not been many major pile
remediation projects in the country as yet. The local and state governments
are just realizing the magnitude of the problem that exists with abandoned
tire piles, and are now beginning to take action.
Part of our ability to be competitive in our bidding for public projects
of this type is our ability to secure markets for the shredded product,
primarily as a fuel source. IWS currently has a contractual relationship with
a firm located in New Jersey to purchase tire chips as fuel product, both from
our Buffalo, New York plant as well as our tire remediation project in
Jacksonville, Florida. This company, known as has a long-term contract with a
cement company of in Greece to supply them with tire-derived-fuel as a substitute
for coal. We are also presently negotiating with two companies in Minnesota
to utilize tire chips as a solid fuel.
0'
o
The marketability of this fuel product is limited only by the type of
boiler systems that can use them as a substitute for coal (stoker-spreader),
and the air regulations governing its use. We have secured this approval of
the State of New York to allow tire chips to be utilized in boiler plants in
the Western New York area. These facilities have run test burns of the chips
and are now utilizing this tire derived fuel. The type of environmental
restrictions with the use of this fuel product are those faced similarly by
coal-fired boiler systems, such as complying with air emission standards and
proper disposal of the ash. If potential users of this product who are
presently burning coal have appropriate particulate collection systems in
their stacks, and have secured proper environmentally acceptable disposal for
the ash from their boilers, then there are no additional requirements that
need be met by the USer of these tire chips as a substitute for coal.
Resources
Integrated Waste Systems presently 'has approximately 74 employees. We
have sixty-six (66) employees in operations, eight (8) in administration and
management capacities.
We have completed the major tire pile remediation projects in Marion, New
York and Jacksonville, Florida. The Town of Marion clean-up had a contract
value of $164,000 and four (4) operations personnel were assigned to that job
site. The City of Jacksonville clean-up has a contract value of $540,000 and
will have a total of nine (9) operations personnel. 1007. of the cost of the
work being performed is by our own forces. The Putnam County, New York project
is scheduled to commence on January 15, 1989 with a completion date of July
15, 1989. '
The nature of the work in thes~ locations is essentially the same, whereby
the tire piles are both lfeing reduced in volume an average of 807. by means of
shredding the tires into 211 X 211 rubber chips and removing them from the sites
by truck. The difference between the two projects is that the Marion tire
chips were delivered to our plant in Buffalo, New York for consolidation into
shipments for bulk fuel users. The Jacksonville tire chips are being delivered
to the local ports for loading onto a transport vessel and ultimate delivery
to Greece to be burned as fuel in a cement kiln.
As far as backlog is concerned and our ability to staff the Andover Tire
Abatement project, we anticipate no problems in maintaining the staff level
required. IWS bids on all major tire pile remediation projects throughout the
United States and Canada, as they arise, and add manpower and equipment as
required. We strongly believe that our firm has sufficient key personnel on
staff to properly and effectively manage and supervise the Andover Tire
Abatement project. Equipment operators and laborers will be hired from local
labor pools in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area and the project
management team that we describe in Section 3 would be put in place to implement
the hiring program. Our ability to provide tire pile clean-ups and maintain
an active Buffalo operation demonstrates unequivocally the ability and capability
of the IWS Management Team.
,0
o
SECTION II
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
IN
TIRE PILE REMEDIATION
IWS is pleased to present a brief summary of some of the tire clean-ups
performed recently. Based upon a review of the quantities identified by The
State of Minnesota, the tire pile consists of approximately 500,000 tires,
that require shredding. The examples presented herein were selected to show
IWS's capabilities to handle similar projects.
We encourage The State of Minnesota to contact these clients for whom IWS
has provided this environmental service. We are proud of our proven track
record and experience in tire pile clean-ups and associated remediation.
Town of Berger
P.O. Box 134
Berger, NY 14416
(716) 494-1362
David Roggow
6,332 tires
Village of North Collins
P.O. Box 640
North Collins, NY 14411
(716) 337-9835
Stan Tezyk
9,890 tires
Morton Salt (Marine Materials)
83 Pfhol Road
Cheektowaga, NY 14225
(716) 633-4666
Bob Pfohl
11,381 tires
Interstate Tire
3257 Walden Ave.
Lancaster, NY 14086
(716) 683-0550
Jerry Mason
6,549 tires (685.38 tons total
debris)
Arthur J. Carafas
391 Cedarwood Terrace
Rochester, NY 14609
(716) 288-7591
Art Cararfas
11,605 tires
Town of Amherst
1042 North Forest
Amherst, NY 14226
(716) 631-7117
Dave Brammer
9,690 tires
Town of Marion
2823 North Main Street
Marion, NY 14505
(315) 926-4271
Mr. Barry L. Thorne
Town Supervisor
Amount of Bid: $168,000
Amount f Tires: 250,000
Performance Bond: None Required
City of Jacksonville
1931 East Beaver Street
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
(904) 630-0973
Mr. George R. Knecht, P.E.
Department of Public Works
Solid Waste Disposal Division
Amount of Bid: $538,000
Amount of Tires: 1.2 Million
Performance Bond: 1007.
o
O'
o
SECTION III
PROJECT STAFFING
IWS will assign two key management staff personnel to the Andover project
as well as two site managers who have worked with IWS since its inception.
The key management personnel assigned will be Mr. Albert J. Gilewicz and Mr,
Charles Laubisch.
Mr. Gi1ewicz will be the key contact person for all matters pertaining to
the contract, environmental issues, end users of the tire chips, billing
procedures, and similar matters.
Mr. Laubisch will be the key contact person for the actual operations of
the site and will personally be involved in setting up the initial operations
for remediation of the existing stockpiles and preparations of the long term
shredding operations.
The actual IWS site managers that will be assigned to this project will
depend upon the timing of this work in conjunction with other ongoing projects.
We assure The State of Minnesota that these individuals will have adequate
experience in the tire shredding business and be capable of handling this
specific project.
In addition, IWS anticipates hiring some equipment operators and laborers
from the, local labor pool to ensure adequate staffing of this project to comply
with the time frames specified in Section 4 - Project Schedule.
o
SECTION IV
ANDOVER TIRE ABATEMENT PROJECT APPROACH
Introduction
As indicated in the previous two sections~ IWS has demonstrated and
documented the firm's expertise in the clean up of several of the largest tire
dumps abated in the United States. Each project has its own unique aspects
which require specific actions or measures to be taken to ensure the successful
completion of the work. The Andover Tire Dump is no exception.
Accordingly~ IWS has developed the following project approach that will
be employed if awarded this contract by the State of Minnesota.
Mobilization
A portable tire shredder will be mobilized and brought to the Andover
Tire Dump by IWS. This unit will include its own generator to supply the
electric power required to operate the shredder and conveyor assemblies. Given
the nature of the site~ there is adequate room to set up the shredding equipment
to shred all tires on site.
Supporting the shredder will be a wheel loader to move the tires from the
various piles on site to the shredder. A rim crusher will be provided on site
to remove the rims, if any, from the tires prior to shredding. In addition to
the shredder and loader, a site trailer will be spotted for operating personnel
and storage of small tools, safety equipment, and office equipment.
Mobilization can be accomplished in approximately 30 days from notice to
proceed. As mobilization commences, security guards will be posted to maintain
a level of security at the site that ,will mitigate the illegal disposal of
waste tires and vandalism during the tire shredding operation and non-working
hours.
Site Activities
IWS proposes to shred all tires on site.
amount of trucks that will be required to move
user or other tire processing facility.
This action will reduce the
the tires off site to an end
Oversize tires will be cut into sizes that can be fed through the shredder
,as the other tires. All tires will be shredded into a nominal two inch by two
inch tire chip and stored on site until sufficient quantities are stockpiled
for hauling off site.
It is estimated that approximately sixty (60) tons per day of tires will
be shredded into the chips that will now become a solid fuel product for which
IWS has developed markets. This fuel product will be moved to the end user as
soon as possible utilizing IWS's own trucking fleet or contracted carriers.
o
o
After mobilization is complete, IWS will Commence shredding the tires
located in Area 6 on the site plan provided by the State of Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency. Shredding of the tires in this area will provide a working
area of sufficient size to enable high volume operations to commence.
With the completion of Area 6, attention will be focused on Area 1 and 2
which lies adjacent to the wetlands ,area. ,This action will mitigate a continuing
degradation of this ecologically sensitive area.
Areas 3 and 4 will follow closely in abatement and thus provide a site
that is buffered from its neighbors on the north and west. To complete this
buffer, a fire lane will be cut through the piles along the south and east
property lines. Upon completion of this safety precaution, large volume
shredding of the balance of the tire pile will occur until completion of the
project.
Tire Chip Disposal
IWS has developed several markets for a nominal two inch by two inch tire
chip. For the Andover Tire Abatement project, IWS proposes to complete the
work under either of two alternates. The first alternate involves obtaining
the approval of the State of Minnesota for the incineration of the tire chips
in a blended tire chip/coal fuel mixture in one of several facilities contacted.
The blended fuel mixture, which will consist of 907. coal and 107. chips, should
not require a PSD evaluation and under the present rules and regulations of
the State of Minnesota and should not result in these existing facilities
being re-classified as NSPS emissions. Accordingly, the issuance of an amended
permit by the State for any of the facilities contacted should require
approximately thirty days. During this time, all contract discussions and
insurance issues can be resolved between the State and IWS.
The price quoted in the Invitation to Bid issued by the State of Minnesota
is based upon this In-State consumption of the tire chips. This price, $71.25
per ton, cannot be provided and adhered to in the absence of this cooperation
from the State of Minnesota. Unless amended permits are granted, development
of markets in the State will lag behind the rest of the country and result in
the higher tire abateme~t bids.
To accommodate this potential In-State usage, IWS has included in its bid
a price for these disposal alternatives, thus offering the State the maximum
cost savings potential and the ability to create an In-State market for tire
chip disposal. It is obvious from the prices quoted, that the In-State
alternative is preferable to out-of-state disposal. Furthermore, the existing
air regulations provide for th~ expeditious approval of such In-State usage
should the State of Minnesota so wish to exercise their discretionary powers,
o
o
O'
.
SECTION V
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The following schedule is submitted at this time to indicate the ability
and anticipated work schedule of IWS for the Andover Tire Abatement project.
Task Start Finish
Mobilization Day 1 Day 15
Area 6, 1 &2 Day 15 Day 45
Area 3, 4 and Fire Lanes Day 46 Day 75
Remaining Areas Day 75 Day 135
De-mobilization Day 135 Day 150
These anticipated durations are based upon a Notice to Proceed being
issued on Day 1 with approximately 150 calendar days to complete the entire
tire abatement effort. In the event that problems are encountered with
hazardous waste material which the State believes exists to a limited extent
on site, the schedule may require modification as a result of any delays
associated with the handling and removal of that material by the State of
Minnesota.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
March 7, 1989
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Discussion Items
16.
ITEM Ordinance 10
NO, Amendment
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
Jay Blakd Planner
BY:
FOR
The Andover City Council is requested to review the following
Amendment to Ordinance #10 regarding the buildable area on a lot
in the rural area and the minimum width requirements for metes and
bounds lots descriptions.
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is reviewed the
items at several meetings in January and February of this year
and have unanimously recommended approval of the amendments.
REVIEW INFORMATION
Contiguous 39,000 Square Feet Buildable Land Area.
Because of problems arising from Lund's Evergreen Estates, Fifth
Addition, the Andover Planning Commission has recommended several
changes in the requirements for buildable area on rural lots.
Ordinance #10 currently requires 39,000 square feet buildable for
each lot. However, the Ordinance does not require the area to be
contiguous, nor does the Ordinance prescribe minimum depths and/or
widths
On January 10, 1989 the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the amendment to Ordinance 10 that
required 39,000 square feet to be contiguous. The Amendment was
delayed because of new problems arising from the Lund's Evergreen
Estates, 5th Addition.
Andover Building Inspector, Dave Almgren is recommending that
specified minimum depth and width dimensions are established.
proposal would prevent any confusion with future subdivisions
eliminating any room for mis-interpretations.
The
by
COUNCil ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
o
page 2
Ordinance 10 Amendment
March 2, 1989
He is recommending that a minimum width of one-hundred fifty feet
(150') and a minimum depth of one-hundred fifty (150') be used.
He has sketched out the dimensions for your review. Again, these
changes would only apply to areas not served by sewer and water
(2-1/2 acre lots). See the enclosed diagram A.
B. Metes and Bounds Lot Descriptions.
Because of concerns raised over the use of metes and bounds lot
descriptions and the potential future problems with roads and
development, the Andover Planning and zoning Commission has
reviewed the requirements for a metes and bounds lot description.
Ordinance 10 currently requires a minimum of five (5 acres and
three hundred feet of width (not frontage). The planning'
Commission found that by requiring an additional thirty (30) feet
in the descriptions, we could avoid problems with road placement.
See the enclosed diagram B.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 10
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 10 is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 7. PRELIMINARY PLAT
7.01 There shall be no conveyance of land described by
metes and bounds if the conveyance is less than five (5) acres in
area and three hundred-thirty (399 30') feet in width
SECTION 9. SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS
9.06 Lots
the
sewer
o
o
Page 2
Ordinance 10 Amendment
c.
iii~eeR
of less
setback
Corner Lots. Corner lots shall be platted at least
+~S+ ten (10) feet wider than interior lots on all lots
than three hundred (300) feet in width at the building
line. (10-17-78)
.
SECTION 14. RESTRICTIONS ON FILING AND RECORDING CONVEYANCES
14.01 Restrictions on Filing and Recording.
3) was a separate parcel of not less than two and one-half
(2 1/2) acres in area and one hundred-fifty (150') feet in width
on January 1, 1966 or is a single parcel of land not less than
five (5) acres in area and having a width of not less than three
hundred - thirty (3GG 30') feet in width.
SECTION 16. PERMITS
16.03 Limitations. No building permit shall be issued for
the erection of any building on any land conveyed in violation of
the provisions of this ordinance. No permit shall be issued for
the erection of any building on any tract of land described by
metes and bounds and consisting of less that five (5) acres in
area and having a width of less than three hundred - thirty -rJGG
30') feet in width.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of , 1988.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
I
-" ....
l~~'f:':''''I''':\:'1.:.. ........~.
L-( 91. )
. ,~ ......:;
'.,_...~r..*~.l,'
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 10, 1989
The regularly scheduled Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Becky
Pease at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 10, 1989, in the Council
Chambers of Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.,
Andover, Minnesota.
Commissioners present included Bev Jovanovich, d'Arcy
Bosell, Becky Pease, Bill Bernard, and Wayne Vistad. Also
present was City Planner, Jay Blake.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The following corrections were made to the December 13, 1988
minutes:
'-.
Ms. Bosell stated that on page four of the minutes, the
fourth paragraph, in the motion, it should read 9.03G (not
99.03G). Also, on the bottom of the same page, in the eighth
paragraph the motion refers to section 9.03, and it should be
9.03A.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Bosell, seconded by
Commissioner Jovanovich to approve the amended minutes of the
December 13, 1988 meeting. All voted yes. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE 10 GENERAL AMENDMENTS
Jay Blake presented the subjects of Metes and" Bounds
Descriptions and Contiguous Buildable Land under Ordinance 10.
o
Mr. Blake stated that there was some concern about the metes
and bounds lot descriptions in areas that are currently zoned R-l
and in the future could be zoned R-4, with sewer and water
connection. Mr. Blake suggested one solution, taken from the
state statutes, would be to redefine what would be allowed by
metes and bounds descriptions to industrial and commercial
districts, 5 acres and 300 feet in width in industrial and
commercial districts, and 20 acres and 600 feet in width in
agricultural and residential districts. The concern with this
concept would be that the City may be limiting ,the amount of
development that could occur in a rural setting.
LO
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
January 10, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Two
Mr. Blake also stated that another alternative, suggested by
Commissioner Bosell, to just require 330 feet in width in the
five acres. This would leave a large enough parcel of land with
the City's current zoning width requirement of 300 feet per lot
in that area plus a 30-foot dedication for a future road.
,-
The 'other item of discussion was with a requirement for
39,000 square feet contiguous buildable area.
Mr. Vistad was 'in favor with the 330 feet requirement
and also with the 39,000 square "feet of contiguous buildable
area.
Commissioner Bosell stated that the' ordinance does not
require a public hearing.
',,-.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by
Commissioner Bosell, that the Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the
following changes to Ordinance 10: In Section 9.06 Lots,
Subsection a(2) and a(3) add the word contiguous in both
paragraphs, so the wording would read "39,000 square feet of
contiguous land." Under Section 14, Restrictions on Filing and
Recording, Subsection 14.01 (3} was a separate parcel of not less
than two and one half (2 1/2) in area and one hundred fifty (150)
feet in width on January 1, 1966 or is a single parcel of land
'not less than five (5) acres in area and having a width of not
less than three hundred-thirty (330) feet in width.
There was discussion by Ms. Bosell in Section 16.03, to add
the language in the third to the last line, "consisting of less
than five (5) acres in area and having a width of less than three
hundred-thirty (330) feet in width." This motion is being
recommended for future development to allow for proper roadway
layout. Also there was discussion to add to this motion Section
9.03 (c) corner lots as presented. With the maker of the
motion's approval and the second's approval, these items were all
added as part of this motion. All voted yes. Motion carried
unanimously.
This item will go to ,the City Council on February 7th.
NORTHWESTERN BELL (US WEST) - S.U.P.
,0
Jay Blake presented this item indicating that a Special Use
permit was being requested by Northwestern Bell (U.S. West) for
o
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
February 14, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Four
ORDINANCE 87 AMENDMENT
Jay Blake stated that Deputy Albertson requested a
clarification of Ordinance 87 (ATV/Snowmobile Ordinance), Section
3, Subsection D regarding the use of snqwmobiles on City Streets.
Jay indicated that the amendment would not change the
intent, but would clarify it for ease of interpretation by the
deputies and residents of Andover.
Commissioner Bernard agreed with this change, if it makes
the Deputy I s jOb easier. ,Chairman Pease, agreed also and stated
that this amendment would be more clear.
MOTION was made by commissioner Bernard, seconded by
Commissioner Spotts that the Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the change
as stated by Officer Albertson as an amendment to Ordinance 87,
Section 3 (D) Operation on Public Property. All voted yes,
Motion carried.
This item will go to the City Council on March 7th.
ORDINANCE 10. AMENDMENT REVISION
Jay Blake stated that the Building Inspector was running
into problems with the wording of the Ordinance 10 Amendment,
Contiguous 39,000 Square Feet Buildable Land Area. Mr. Almgren
is now recommending that specified minimum depth and width
dimensions should be established as follows: a minimum width of
150 feet and a minimum depth of 150 feet be used. These changes
would apply to only the areas not served by sewer and water (2-
1/2 acre lots). The proposal would prevent any confusion with
future sUbdivisions by eliminating any room for
misinterpretations,
Becky Pease asked if this change would be for all districts.
Jay Blake stated this amendment would go in lots or areas lacking
municipal sanitary sewer within and outside the urban service
area.
Mr. Bernard asked about the 150 feet figure and the fact
that they don't add up to 39,000. He wondered why the City did
not prepare numbers that would, when mUltiplied, add up to the
39,000 square feet number. Mr. Blake stated that the requirement
would still be 39,000 square feet, ,but that the minimum width and
depth would be 150 feet. Mr. Bernard stated that if this change
would assist the building inspector, that he had no problems with
o
o
Andover Zoning and Planning Commission
February 14, 1989 Meeting Minutes
Page Five
it. Jay Blake stated it would make the staff's job in reviewing
plats a lot easier.
Rosella Sonsteby had asked for clarification of this
ordinance.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Bernard, seconded by
Commissioner Jovanovich that the Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the amended
revision to Ordinance 10. The Building Inspector recommends a
minimum width of 150 feet by at least 150 feet in depth and would
have to total 39,000 contiguous square feet in reference in
section 9, Subsections (a) and (c). All voted yes. Motion
carried.
This item will go to the City Council on March 7th.
SIGN ORDINANCE. SECTION 8.07. DISTRICT PROVISIONS
Jay Blake reported that he had received copies of sign
ordinances from the cities of Coon Rapids, Anoka, Waconia,
Woodbury, Minnetrista and Eden Prairie. He had tried to get a
copy of the City of Minneapolis' sign ordinance but had some
difficulty.aft& it could be obtained for a fee of $35, which he
declined to pay~ '
Mr. Spotts commented that he could get a copy of the sign
ordinance from Brooklyn Park.'
.
Jay related that the P & Z had recommended at their 1/24/89
meeting that signs in the residential district be increased from
1-1/2 square feet to 4 square feet. Jay feels Andover would be
right in line with other communities in making this
recommendation.
Also Jay wanted to clarify the size restrictions in
Commercial and Industrial districts. He recommends removing the
provision, " plus one (1) square foot per front foot of property
not occupied by a building." The ordinance would then be easier
to enforce and explain to developers.
Mr. Bernard expressed that anything that makes it easier for
both residents, developers, and/or city staff, he would agree
with. "
o
Mr. spotts asked if the staff coul~ add an example or sample
sign for each of these areas t~includedin the sign ordinance.
Mr. Blake stated this would be useful in making a handout for
residents. bv
LO
I
i'
1 '
:.1
,1;:
i
I
I
Ii
I
"
.;2. ~,
,4c~L.
~6/
Zl",;/J'.,.jlG- ~,-k./ s-.;~"A-";>-..,.t',p.<- f
,&", ~L..L tJon7,//Pc4./ -7~ At?; ",-7 , S-7"'~ ~~
/0; S-4:~ s./: '!: ,&"ftI"e S-rl'"'.hc.,
5"'/,5:k.p of ~.kc/ .$L~s
~
&
l}
"',
:0
','
;
. :.
~"
I,
//'///1 .
c1 L ~'oI'/
, '
!!J
I'
I,
,"
!:'
I,
(',
ii:
I,
i,
I"
I
I',
..I
!:
I.i
I,
I,
~~-- ~ _.- - -'-.- ~
I"
:'
ji;
I;
"
I;;
I"
"
/,,/
/
/
/
I
~
"
I
,
_..........'......e'''''''-~'_..:...,..
Isa .
...... ......--.." .
D 'a~ A-
/ s-o' v' /":;>0'
. .~, ---------_...._--_._---~---_..._-_.__..-.._--_._---"_.....-----
--.
-
;;..:L SO' 0 .F~
---=/ ---,--,----",--,
~
, . /
, ,L5_a____t/f...LLd__~___
~~:::~-:'~-~:::-:::::.-.......~~..:::~::::::-~-:-:~::=
-
-
_~_6:,6 I'
LJ~e______"_,
- --'-'----;---------2--------
,c2-foa-----I~/ L_ G.___.. __ :::__L..s-o
L/ .e ~~_,____
.._........_.._.__._m _.._____..._ _. .__......__._ _.._._ ._...______.__________.___________._ .....__.....__....~- 0--
_3. 9",~s:_E:_,,/~L$.~/.~h/L~____,____
". ,-- -,----,--- '-:l-r--~-7---y-----------------u----------
~=~!:1~-=Iz'?~~- ?~~~=u .
_._____ _.____~_ __ n_--T----.h',-- --.---.
o
- I
,f--------
:::j.".
I
I
,
~
I
,
1
I
,
I
Lo+ r
A I LD+ B C u.rre.() +
I If Go "qre me.t1-1:5
I
I
I
r
I
I
300' I ~OO'
Z7o' (PC> I - ?10'
1{6o..4.W~
,r-~)
!3elow /Yj1l'l1f/1/..crr1 11-1 5'iadI c/a..roh- .
o
I 1
1 1
I I
I
I
I 1
I I
Lo+ fI I I [b+ 13
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
3:30 ~ I .,350 I
"" -300' - (PO 1--, 30::/
Pro po&ed
C2~?J
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee,
DATE March 7, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM 17 .
NQ Reduction of State
Aid Road Funds
BY:
James E. Schrantz
FOR
Engineering
The city Council is requested to approve the attached resolution
that the Council supports increases in the transfer of MVET funds
so long as the funds are dedicated to transportation system
improvements and removal of "Sunset provision" in the law.
Background
In 1988 the Minnesota Legislature adopted a bill which provided
for a transfer of a portion of the Minnesota Vehicle Excise Tax
(MVET) funds to funds established for the improvement of
transportation facilities. Specifically, the new law provides
that:
* In fiscal year 1988, 5% of MVET funds would be transferred
into transportation related funds.
* Starting in fiscal year 1989, and continuing indefinitely,
the amount of that transfer to transportation related funds
would be increased to 30% of the total MVET funds available.
* Of the amounts transferred to transportation related funds,
25% is to be used for transit system improvements -
indefinitely.
* During fiscal year 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991, the other 75%
is to be placed into the "Highway User Fund" which, by
constitutional amendment, provides that those funds be
apportioned as follows:
62% to
.-4'9..% to
9~to
~,-J /
MNDOT
Counties
Cities over 5000
COUNCIL ACTION
I
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
\
o
March 7, 1989
Reduction of state
Aid Road Funds
BUT starting in fiscal year 1992, a "Sunset provision" contained
in the law provides that the 75% (of the 30% MVET transfer) be
placed directly into the "Trunk Highway Fund" instead of into
the Road User Fund. By this provision, counties and cities
will be cut out from receiving any portion of the MVET
transfer after fiscal year 1991.
Impact on Andover
Based on current revenues to the MVET funds, and the current
formulas for distribution of Road User Funds through the Municipal
State Aid Street System, the city of Andover will receive
approximately $27,800 additional MSAS allocations during the time
that the MVET transfer is placed into the Road User Fund. If the
"Sunset provision" remains in place, the city's MSA allocations
will again revert to the lower figure (i.e. approximately $459,570
per year instead of $487,431 per year).
Current Legislative Proposals
In his 1989 budget message, Governor Perpich proposed the
following changes to the MVET transfer law:
* increase the MVET transfer to 35% in fiscal year 1990
* increase the MVET transfer to 45% in fiscal year 1991
* reallocate the entire MVET transfer, so as to redistribute
the amount available (estimated at $49 million) as follows:
$23 million to Trunk Highway Fund
$4 million to LRT
$22 million to a "Local Assistance Fund"
to be apportioned using the Local Government Assistance
(LGA) formula - not dedicated for street or roadway
improvements.
It is my understanding there are a number of other proposals
relating to MVET funds forthcoming from various legislators -
running the full gamut from elimination of the MVET transfer to a
100% transfer, and from decreases to the co~nty and city state aid
shares to increases in those shares.
At any rate, this is an item which will have significant effects
on the city's future ability to improve our Municipal State Aid
Street System.
Attachments: Resolution
CEAM Letter
o
Note: I am a member of the City Engineers of Minnesota
Legislative Committee. We have a conference call every Monday
morning at 8:00 with State Aid, Counties and City representatives.
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
o
A RESOLUTION REGARDING FUNDING FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM IN STATE OF MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, the 1988 Minnesota Highway Funding Act provided
additional funding for Municipal State Aid Street Systems by way of a
transfer of a portion of the Minnesota Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) funds
to the Road User Fund; and
WHEREAS, that Act also includes a "Sunset provision" by which
cities and counties will cease to receive a portion of the MVET funds
in fiscal year 1992, and provides that all MVET transfers for fiscal
years 1992 and beyond be allocated to the Minnesota Trunk Highway Fund
and to the Transit System Fund; and
WHEREAS, the Governor's 1989 budget proposal includes proposals to
increase the level of MVET transfers, while also reallocating those
transfers to include funding for non-transportation purposes; and
WHEREAS, new policies and procdures recently adopted by MNDOT
require increased levels of financial participation in trunk highway
improvements by cities and counties; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature and MNDOT continue to increase
their efforts to turn back trunk highways and county highways to
municipal jurisdiction, thereby increasing the cities' share of
financial responsibilities while decreasing financial aids to the
cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Andover, Minnesota, that:
1. The City Council supports increases in the transfer of MVET
funds, so long as those funds are dedicated to transportation
system improvements.
2. The City Council strongly recommends removal of the "Sunset
Provision", and recommends that the law be amended to provide
that all future MVET transfers be made to the Road User Fund
instead of to the Trunk Highway Fund.
3. The City Administrator is hereby directed to send copies of
this resolution to area legislators, with a request for their
support of the City's recommendations.
4. Legislators representing the City of Andover are requested to
sponsor legislation in support of the City's recommendations.
Passed by the Andover City Council on the 7th day of March 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION
of MINNESOTA
o
'CI.,.,t]....' ~~
, (.,
~
, ' I.
. ,
February 13, 1989
TO: City Engineer or City Clerk
Andover
RE: Reduction in Your Share of State Aid Road Funds
RI~~~~~:910
CITY OF ANnOVER
Legislation (House File 1749) which was passed in 1988 provided for continuation
of the sharing by the state, counties, and cities of monies transferred from the
Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund, That
legislation has a Sunset Clause that will eliminate the counties and cities from
sharing those ~~ET funds in 1992.
This is a concern to all cities, The figures below will give you an idea of the
losses in State Aid funds for roads that your city will experience after 1991
under the present law. The figures compare funds that are allocated to you in
1989 with the money you would have received in 1989 if the Sunset Clause cutoff
had taken effect in 1989, The actual figures for 1992 are unknown at this time,
Actual 1989 Allocation
1989 Allocation
if MVET had been
Eliminated in 1989
Net Loss in 1989 State Aid
Funds if MVET Funds had been
Eliminated for 1989
$487,431
$459,570
$27,861
The City Engineers Association of Minnesota unanimously passed the attached
Resolution concerning MVET funding, It is forwarded for your information and as
a sample that may be used for your city's consideration of passing a similar
resolution,
Your assistance in your city's passing and forwarding a similar resolution to
your legislators, and/or other contacts with your legislators, is encouraged.
Passage of legislation to eliminate the Sunset Clause and continue cities
sharing the MVET income for road purposes is important to all cities. Your
efforts will be greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions, please contact one of the following persons:
Bruce Bullert
Larry Anderson
(507) 645-8831
(612) 447-4230
Jim Grube
Ken Saffert
Ron Rudrud
(612) 924-2551
(507) 625-3161
(612) 881-5811
Yours truly,
~l..,~
o
Ronald L. Rudrud, P.E.
President, CEAM
....._..__....._.._...' ,".. . .._~,.' .....n....__._"........... ..".....' .__.~._.....__......~. ...... ..---.-,.
CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
o
o
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be forwarded to the Governor,
the Commissioner of transportation, and to the members of the State
Legislature.
Unanimously passed and adopted at their annual meeting this 19th day of
January, 1989.
J;~' 8~
Secretary
U)J~
President
l:'.,l
o
o
'" ...~._.~.'_.. .._.. .
.--- .... ~-,~' -"--'-~"-, ...........
...#,.......-'\'-......"",,'...,_..........~-_._..
0:
o
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
March 7, 1989
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Staff, Committee, Comm.
ITEM Approve Animal Control
NO, 18Contract
BY:
V. VOLK
I have been unable to reach Animal Control to ask about
Item 13 of the Contract.
I will continue to try to contact them and will have an
answer for Council by Tuesday evening.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA !
BY:
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 7, 1989
ITEM Approve Assessment
NO, Abatements
19.
BY:
V. Volk
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Staff, Committee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
The City Council is requested to approve the following assess-
ment abatements:
1. Langseth's Pine Acres: The amounts certified to the 1989
taxes were incorrectly entered on the tax statements as
$522.06 per lot. The first abatement notice has 36 parcels
which were incorrect; the correct amount is $261.03 for
each parcel. The other two abatements are for parcels that
were assessed for more than one unit.
I have talked to the County regarding these assessments and
they cannot determine why the amounts are incorrect as they
have the same assessment roll that I have, which shows
$261. 03 per lot.
After the assessments have been abated, the correct amount
will be certified and new tax statements will be issued.
2. Brandon's Lakeview Estates: This plat was assessed double
for water area charges.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
Form No, 2504 ,(Rev, 3-2-82)
Commissioner of Revenue Abatement Form 7 (Rev. 3/74)
APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT
MILLER-DAVIS CO.. MINNEAPOLIS
GENERAL FORM
~
-~ 6
~
. -u
,2 ,
~ <
~ >-
E '0:
E ci , 0
0 0
U Z U Z
For Taxes Assessed in Year
a
..
c
,
o
U
Complete in triplicate if tax reciuction and Payab Ie in Year
exceeds $500; otherw;~e complete in
duplicate. . Please print or type.
School District No. Dot. of Application
Applicant's Name and Social Security Number
15
3 2 89
Zip Code
55304
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The 1989 special assessments for the attached Property Identification
Numbers were certified incorrectly. The amount of $522.06 should'be
abated and the correct amount, $261.03, should be certified.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST
Abate the $522.06 certified to the taxes on the attached PIN's and
certify $261.03 to each PIN.
This assessment is under Fund 1551.
Applicant's Signature
Dote
NOTE: Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 609.41 "Whoever in making any stotement, oral or written, which is required or authorized by law to be made os 0
basis of imposing, reducing or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement os to any material matter which he knows is false may be
sentel1ced, unless otherwise provided by law, to imprisonment for not more thon one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000, or both.
REPORT OF INVESTIGATION (by County Assessor or City Assessor in certain cities)
I hereby report that I hove investigated the stotemen1s mode in the foregoing application and find the facts 10 be os follows:
o
,,:: iI.
CERTIFICATE AND RECOMMENDATION BY COUNTY BOARD AND COUNTY AUDITOR
I, the undersigned, County Auditor of the within nomed county,do hereby certify that a careful exomination into the allegotions
ond statements set forth in the within application has been mode by the County Board of said county and by myself
and that from ,said examination we are convinced and believe that said allegations ond statements ore true.
o
I further certify that, ot a meeting held , 19_, said County Baord, by officiol oct ion
upon motion duly odopted ond entered upon the minutes of its proceedings os a public record, showing the names of
the toxpayers and other persons concerned and the amounts involved, mode the following recommendotion, wherein
I hereby concur, upon said application:
Thot the assessed volue of said property be reduced to ond fixed at $
hereby certify the result of the adoption of said recommendation will beos follows:
Amount of reduction of assessed value $
Amount of reduction of taxes $
Signature of County Auditor
Date
ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - STATE OF MINNESOTA
, 19_
REJECTION
ACCEPTANCE
Upon due consideration of the within application it is
ordered that the sqme be and it is hereby rejected.
Upon due consideration of the within application it is
(ndered that:
Commissioner of Revenue
D the recommendation of the County Board and County
Audi tar be granted.
o
By
Reason for Rejection:
The auditor and treasurer of said county are hereby autho-
rized and directed to make stich changes in the records and
books of their respective offices as may be necessary to
carry out this order.
o
Commissioner of Revenue
By
05 32 24 44 0001 05 32 24 44 0039
0 05 32 24 44 0004 05 32 24 44 0040
05 32 24 44 0005 05 32 24 44 0041
05 32 24 44 0006 05 32 24 44 0042
05 32 24 44 0007
05 32 24 44 0008
05 32 24 44 0009
05 32 24 44 0010
05 32 24 44 0011
05 32 24 44 0012
05 32 24 44 0013
05 32 24 44 0015
05 32 24 44 0016
05 32 24 44 0018
05 32 24 44 0019
05 32 24 44 0020
05 32 24 44 0021
05 32 24 44 0022
05 32 24 44 0023'
05 32 24 44 0024
05 32 24 44 0025
05 32 24 44 0026
05 32 24 44 0029
05 32 24 44 0030
05 32 24 44 0031
05 32 24 44 0032
05 32 24 44 0033
05 32 24 44 0034
0 05 32 24 44 0035
05 32 24 44 0036
05 32 24 44 0037
05 32 24 44 0038
Form No. 2504 ,(Rev, 3-2-62)
Commissioner of Revenue Abatement Form 7 (Rev. 3/74)
APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT
MillER-DAVIS CO.. MINNEAPOLIS
GENERAL FORM
~
.~ .~
t
c ..,
0 ,
~ <( a
,~ >-
E ;; >-
E , . ~
0 c
0 00 "
U Z Uz 0
U
For Taxes Assessed in Year
Complete in triplicate it tax reciuction
exceeds $500; otherwise complete in
duplicate. . Please print or type.
and Payob Ie in Year
Applicant's Name and Social Security Number
City of Andover
Street Address
1685 Crosstown-Boulevard N.W.
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS:
15
Dote of Application
3/2/89
Zip Cod.
55304
The special assessments for 1989 were incorrectly certified to PIN
05 32 24 44 0043. The incorrect amount of $522.06 should be abated and
the correct amount of $783.09 should be certified.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST
Please abate the $522.06 certified to the taxes for PIN 05 32 24 44 0043 and
certify $783.09.
This is under Fund 1551.
Applicant's Signature
Dote
NOTE: Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 609.41 IlWhoever in moking any statement, oral or written, which is required or authorized by low to be mode as a
basis of imposing, reducing or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement 05 to cny moterial matter which he knows is false may be
sentenced, unless otherwise provided by. low, to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more thon $1,000, or both.
REPORT OF INVESTIGATION (by County Assessor or City Assessor in certain cities)
I hereby report 1hot I have inves1igated 1he statements made in the foregoing application and find the facts ta be os follows:
o
CERTIFICATE AND RECOMMENDATION BY COUNTY BOARD AND COUNTY AUDITOR
I, the undersigned, County Auditor of the within named county,do hereby certify that 0 coreful exomination into the ollegations
and statements set forth in the within opplication hos been mode by the County Board of said county and by myself
and thot from said examination we are convinced and believe that said alle9ations ond stotements ore true.
o
I further certify that, ot a meeting held , 19_, soid County Board, by officiol action
upon motion duly odopted and entered upon the minutes of its proceedings os 0 public record, showing the names of
the taxpoyers ond other persons concerned and the amounts involved, made the following recommendotion, wherein
I hereby concur, upon soid applicotion:
Thot the ossessed value of said property be reduced to and fixed ot $
hereby certify the result of the odoption of soid recommendation will be as follows:
Amount of reduction of assessed value $
Amount of reduction of taxes $
Signature of County Auditor
Dote
ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - STATE OF MINNESOTA
,19_
REJECTION
ACCEPTANCE
Upon due consideration of the within application it is
ordered that the same be and it is hereby rejected.
Upon due consideration of the within appHcation it is
ardered that:
Commissioner of Revenue
o the recommendoti on of the County Board and County
Auditor be granted.
o
By
Reoson for Rejection:
The auditor and treasurer of said county are hereby autho~
rized and directed to make such changes in the records and
books of their respective offices as may be necessary to
carry out this order.
o
Commissioner of Revenue
By
Form No, 2504 ,(Rev, 3-2-82)
Commissioner of Revenue Abatement Form 7 (Rev. 3/74)
APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT
MILLER.DAVIS co.. MINNEAPOLIS
GENERAL FORM
."
~
c
o
"
"
E
~ 0
U Z
"
~
."
:>
<(
,.
C
:> .
00
Uz
For Taxes Assessed in Yeor
-
o
!'
c
:>
o
U
Complete in triplicate if tax rcelllction
exceeds $500; otherwise complete in
duplicate. . Please print or type.
and Payable in Year
Applicant's Name and Social Security Number
Cit of Andover
Street Address
1685 Crosstown ,Boulevard N.W.
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Dote of Application
Andover
55304
The special assessments for 1989 were incorrectly certified to,the
taxes for PIN 05 32 24 43 0003.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST
Please abate the $522.06 certified to the taxes and certify $1,044.12.
This assessment is under Fund 1551.
Applicant's Signature
Date
NOTE: Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 609.41 ftWhoever in making any statement, oral or written, whic:his required or authorized by low to be made as a
basis of imposing, reducing or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement as to any moterial motter which he knows is false may be
sentenced, unless otherwise provided by. low, to imprisonment for net mere than one year or to' payment of 0 fine of not more than $1,000, or both.
REPORT OF INVESTIGATION (by County Assessor or City Assessor in certain cities)
I hereby report 1hot I have invesligated 1he stotements made in the foregoing opplication ond find the facts to be as fallows:
o
CERTIFICATE AND RECOMMENDATION BY COUNTY BOARD AND COUNTY AUDITOR
I, the undersigned, County Auditor of the within named county,do hereby certify that a coreful exomination into the allegations
and statements set forth in the within opplication has been made by the County Board of said county and by myself
and thot from said examination we are convinced and believe that said allegations ond statements are true.
o
I further certify that, at a meeting held , 19_, said County Boord, by official action
upon motion duly odopted ond entered upon the minutes of its proceedings as 0 public record, showing the nomes of
the taxpoyers ond other persons concerned and the amounts involved, mode the following recommendotion, wherein
I hereby concur, upon soid applicotion:
Thot the assessed value of said property be reduced to and fixed at $
hereby certify the result of the odoption of said recommendotion will be as follows:
Amount of reduction of os sessed va lue $
Amount of reduction of taxes $
Signature of County Auditor
Date
ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - STATE OF MINNESOTA
, 19_
REJECTION
ACCEPTANCE
Upon due consideration of the within application it is
ordered that the some be and it is hereby rejected.
Upon due consideration of the within application it is
ardered that:
Commissioner of Revenue
o the reco-mmendoti on of the County Board and County
Auditor be granted.
o
By
Reason for Rejecti.on:
The auditor and treasurer of said county are hereby autho-
rized and directed to make such changes in the records and
books of their respective. offices as may be necessary to
carry out this order.
o
Commissioner of Revenue
By
:;c
Form No. 25041Rev, 3-2082)
Commi.ssioner of Revenue Abatement Form 7 (Rev. 3/74)
APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT
MILLER-DAVIS CO.. MINNEAPOLIS
GENERAL FORM
" 0"
. . 2
.
0 't;
0 ,
" <(
,~ l'
E 0
E ci , 0
0 0
U Z U Z
For Taxes Assessed in Year
-
o
>-
~
c
,
o
U
Complete in triplicate if tax reduction
exceeds $500; otherwise complete in
duplicate. ,Please print or type.
ond Poyob Ie in Year
Dot. of Application
Applicant's Name and Social Security Number
Street Address
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Andover
55304
The properties in Brandon's Lakeview EStates were assessed twice
for water area charges.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST
Please abate the assessments on the following PINs under Fund 1153:
29 32 24 42 0051: 29 32 24 42 0052: 29 32 24 42 0053: 29 32 24 42 0054:
29 32 24 42 0055.
Applicant's Signature
Dote
NOTE: Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 609.41 "Whoever in making any stotement, oral or written, which is required or authorized by law to be made as a
basis oF-imposing, reducing or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement as to any material matter which he knows is false may be
sentenced, unless otherwise provided by- law, to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000, or both.
REPORT OF INVESTIGATION (by County Assessor or City Assessor in certain cities)
I hereby report that I have investigated the statements made in the foregoing application and find the facts to be os follows:
o
CERTIFICATE AND RECOMMENDATION BY COUNTY BOARD AND COUNTY AUDITOR
I, the undersigned, County Auditor of the within named county,do hereby certify that 0 coreful examinotion into the ollegations
and statements set forth in the within applicotian hos been mode by the County Board of said county and by myself
and thot from said examination we are convinced and believe that said allegations and statements are true.
o
I further certify thot, ot a meeting held , 19_, soid County Board, by afficiol action'
upon motion duly adopted ond entered upon the minutes of its proceedings os 0 public record, showing the names of
the toxpayers and other persons concerned and the amounts involved, mode the following recommendation, wherein
I hereby concur, upon said application:
That the ossessed value of said property be reduced to ond fixed at $
hereby certify the result of the adoption of said recommendation will be os follows:
Amount of reduction of assessed value $
Amount of reduction of taxes
$
Signature of County Auditor
Date
ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - STATE OF MINNESOTA
, 19_
REJECTION
ACCEPTANCE
Upon due consideration of the within application it is
ordered that the same be and it is hereby rejected.
Upon due consideration of the within appUcation it ;s
ordered that:
Commissioner of Revenue
o the recommendation of the County Board and County
Audi tar be granted.
D
By
Reason for Rejection:
The auditor and treasurer of said county are hereby autho-
rized and directed to make stich changes in the records and
books of their respective offices os may be necessary to
carry out this order.
o
Commissioner of Revenue
By
----
~
fit
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Staff, Committee,
DATE March 7, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
FOR
ITEM 20.
NO, Award Bid/Northwoods
Tennis Court
~1'~
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to table this item as requested by
the par.k and Recreation Commission.
The quotes received at the bid opening on March 2, 1989 were too
high. The project is going to be re-bid for a third time.
Residents have submitted a petition to keep the tennis courts in
Northwoods West Park.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
e
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
March 7, 1989
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~~
Jay Blake,~lanner
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Staff, Committee
APPROVED FOR
AGE
ITEM 23.
NO, AgriChem Lot
Purchase
The Andover city Council is requested to review
sale of a lot in the Andover Commercial Park to
AgriChem Inc., P.O. Box 845, Anoka, Minnesota.
letter outlines the proposal.
the conceptual
Dave Greer of
The enclosed
AgriChem is a local business that manufactures grain separating
and drying equipment. The business also sells FDA approved
chemical for mixing with the grain to provide the best moisture
content in feed grains for livestock etc. Mr. Greer plans to
build a warehouse/manufacturing/office complex on Lot 1, Block 3.
The sale is unique since the purchaser would like make an initial
payment and the final payment on the lot would be expected within
six months. He would begin construction after the purchase was
completed. If the Council believes that this arrangement is
appropriate, I will notify Mr. Greer and Bill Hawkins can draft
the needed purchase agreement.
Please advise staff of the action desired by the City Council.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
AgrlChem, Inc,
p.o. Box 845
Anoka, Minnesota 55303-0845
(612) 755-8775
\gr{Chem
tl)
.,.<
~,.,
February 20, 1989
Mr. Jay Blake
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
I '(3lade.. 3
Lof' f
Dear Jay: " ' ?
This' is to confirm' the d~scussions that we have h~d,~er the last couple of
months about the possibility of our purchasing aI, in the Andover Com-
mercial Park and the subsequent construction of !office/warehouse build-
ing. We are specifically interested in.t.ot 1 of P rG9l 3 in the Park (S.E.
corner of 136th and Thrush Street). As per our discussions, there are
several concerns that we have that will need to be specifically addressed
in the purchase agreement:
1. Our overriding concern is to avoid or at least minimize debt, which will
require a two year period for this project to be completed.
A. Our proposed building would be approximately six thousand square
feet, with five thousand of that warehouse and the remainder office.
B. We would be allowed to complete and occupy the warehouse area, wh:jJ~"
leaving the office area to be completed as time and money became"
available over the next year and one half. Externally the building
would be finished when we occupy the warehouse.
2. In lieu of a realtor's commission, not incurred in this sale, the City
of Andover would allow AgriChem, Inc. six months to complete payment for
the described property without interest charge.,
I believe this covers the points that we have discussed. If this is not
your understanding, please contact me so we can clarify.
If his is generally agreeable, please have the attorney representing the
City of Andover in this project contact Mr. Lawrence Johnson of the firm
Steffen and Munstenteiger, P.A, in Anoka, who represents us. They can draft
the required papers. After the purchase agreement has been finished we will
begin to develop the plans necessary for council approval. We plan to begin
building by late this SUIIllIler. '
Thank you for your assistance. We-are looking forward to working with you.
o
Sincerely,
ft<t4..eJ~
~
David Greer
President
cc: Lawrence Johnson
.-.
,-
o
Agr1Chem, Inc.
Gra1n Prep'"
Auto Del1very System
Schemat1c
(Pltent Pending)
Sensor
Mounting
Box
./
Access Door
Moisture Sensor
...
Treated Grain to
feed Manufooturlng
Grain PreplM + Water j
Del1very Une ' -..!
Signal Cab Ie
Conduit -tI-
Grain Prep'" Auto Delivery System
Control Module
o
o
~
~, Ino,
t
Water
t 000 lb Capacity
Platform Scale
...
~
~
o
12/1/87
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
March 7, 1989
ITEM
NO,
Engineering
,,~ Yt
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to accept the deed for a road
easement over Creek ridge Park as requested by Woodland
Development.
The road easement is for the entrance to the golf course and
clubhouse. Woodland Development has also indicated that they will
maintain the easement to 50 feet on both sides of the centerline
of the proposed roadway.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
F'
Form No. 31.M -QUIT CLAIM DEED
Corporation or PartnershIp
to Corporation or Partnership
Minnesola UaUonn COawyueJaIBI.nks (1978)
Mllfer.Osvls CO., Mlnn"polls
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19_
by
(reserved for recording data)
o
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Andover
, a municiDal corporatiorunder the laws of
, Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Woodl Sinn DAVA 1 npm":mt'
, Grantee,
, real property in
a
Minnesota
Corporation
corkoration
Ano a
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
See reverse side for complete legal.
(If more space is needed, continue on backl
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
City of Andover
o
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this
by
the
of (;1. ty ot Andover
under the laws of Minnesota
r -=H.-----.--.~1
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS):
Woodland Development Co,
830 West Main Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
day of
,19_,
Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here
By
Its
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
Anok;i
} g,
and
and
fa munic:lna.l .cnrpoT::lt:inn
,on behalf of the t"'nypnY.Af-inn
SIGNATURB or PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
~:~:t'$t;'U~~ul:~~::i ~t&::~/&=~:~)IID U111 bmrummt lbou14
Woodland Development Corporation
830 West Main Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
o
A 60,00 foot wide easement for access road purposes over and across
the following described property:
The park adjacent to Blocks 4 and 5 in CREEKRIDGE ESTATES,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.
The centerline of said easement is described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter
of the Southeast Quarter of section 29, Township 32, Range
24, Anoka County, Minnesota; thence westerly on an assumed
bearing of North 89 degrees 06 minutes 57 seconds West,
along the southerly line of said Northeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter, a distance of 196.50 feet to the point
of beginning of the centerline to be described, thence North
o degrees 53 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 88.89
feet to the southerly line of South Coon Creek Drive and
there terminating.
The side lines of said easement are lengthened and shortened to
terminate of said south line of South Coon Creek Drive.
o
e
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Non-Di
ITEM 25.
NO, Approve 30 MPH Speed
Limit
DATE March 7, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
,(1~
BY: '
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution which
allows the speed limit to be reduced from:
1) 55 mph to 30 mph on South Enchanted Drive between the
intersection with Dakota Street and a point approximately
400 feet west of the intersection with Aztec Street NW.
2) 55 mph to 30 mph on 160th Lane NW between the intersection
with Dakota street NW and the intersection with North
Enchanted Lane NW.
3) 55 mph to 35 mph on Dakota Street NW between County State
Aid Highway 20 and the intersection with County Road 58.
Attached are three resolutions; one for each street.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT ON SOUTH ENCHANTED
DRIVE BETWEEN THE INTERSECTION WITH DAKOTA STREET NW AND A POINT
APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH AZTEC STREET
NW IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
WHEREAS, 30 mph speed limit signs are to be placed on South
Enchanted Drive in Fox Meadows Subdivision.
WHEREAS, MNDOT has given authorization to lower the speed
limit to 30 mph.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 30 mph speed limit signs
be placed on South Enchanted Drive in Fox Meadows Subdivision.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 7th day
of March, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT ON 160TH LANE NW IN
FOX MEADOWS IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
WHEREAS, 30 mph speed limit signs are to be placed on 160th
Lane NW in Fox Meadows Subdivision.
WHEREAS, MNDOT has given authorization to lower the speed
limit to 30 mph.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 30 mph speed limit signs
be placed on 160th Lane NW in Fox Meadows Subdivision.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 7th day
of March, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 35 MPH SPEED LIMIT ON DAKOTA STREET NW
IN FOX MEADOWS IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
WHEREAS, 35 mph speed limit signs are to be placed on Dakota
Street in Fox Meadows Subdivision.
WHEREAS, MNDOT has given authorization to lower the speed
limit to 35 mph.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 35 mph speed limit signs
be placed on Dakota Street in Fox Meadows Subdivision.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 7th day
of March, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
o
t(i\
o.~
i
'i
I:
I:
r
I
1-'
II'
i!
!'l
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Page-1.- of --LPages
--
LOCAL STREET OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION
Road AuthoritYCity of Andover IDate February 2, 1989
Road Name or ~'b'uth Enchanted Drive N,W.
Termini of Zone: From
Dakota Street N.W.
To I Date of Req uest
400' West of Aztec Street N,W. November 1. 1988
I
"
,
Kindly make the following changes in speed limits on the above-referenced section, Changes authorized herein are in
accordance with Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act, M,$, Chapter 169,14 and applicable subdivisions thereof,
30 miles per hour between the intersection with Dakota Street N.W.
and a point approximately 400 feet west of the intersection with
Aztec Street N.W.
Note:
The above speed limits are authorized contingent upon curves and
hazards being signed with the appropriate advance Curve or warning
signs, including appropriate Speed Advisory Plates. The roadway
described above shall be reviewed for traffic control devices
impacted by the authorized speed limits before posting the signs.
Warning signs and speed limit signs shall be in accordance with the
Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 1986.
Please
Sign _
Here
(3) White - Road Authority
(I) Pink - Central Office Traffic
(1) Blue - District Traffic Engineer
A Road Authority use only
Wte traffic control devices changed implementing this authorization
I Month-Day-Year I Signature
I Title
STATE OF MINNESOTA
__. .o,RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
t(il
ClF~
1 1
Page_ of _Pages
e
LOCAL STREET OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION
Road Authoritl<C~ ty of Andover
Road Nameor r:t'bOth Lane N.W.
Termini of Zone.; From S N W
Uakota treet . .
North Enchanted Lane N.W.
Date of Request
November 1, 1988
To
Kindly make the following changes in speed limits on the above-referenced section, Changes authorized herein are in
accordance with Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act, M,$. Chapter 169,14 and applicable subdivisions thereof,
30 miles per hour between the intersection with Dakota Street N.W.
and the intersection with North Enchanted Lane N.W.
Note:
The above speed limits are authorized contingent upon curves and
hazards being signed with the appropriate advance Curve or warning
signs, including appropriate Speed Advisory Plates. The roadway
described above shall be reviewed for traffic control devices
impacted by the authorized speed limits before posting the signs.
Warning signs and speed limit signs shall be in accordance with the
Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 1986.
Please
Sign _
Here
Signature of Traffic Engineer
tfl2tf/0.
(3) White - Road Authority
(l) Pink - Central Office Traffic
(l) Blue - District Traffic Engineer
. Road Authority use only ,
Vte traffic control devices changed implementing this authorization
I Month-Day.Year I Signature
I Title
fit
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~_. ARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
t8'
~~
Page ~ of ---.!..Pages
LOCAL STREET OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION
Road AuthoritYCi ty of Andover IDate February 2, 1989
Road Name or "tfctkota Street N.W.
Termini of Zone: From 20 (157th Ave. N.W.)
C.S .A.H.
To I Date of Request
County Road 58 (Valley Drive) November 1. 1988
Kindly make the following changes in speed limits on the above-referenced section, Changes authorized herein are in
accordance with Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act, M,S, Chapter 169,14 and applicable subdivisions thereof.
35 miles per hour between the intersection with County State Aid
Highway 20 and the intersection with County Road 58.
Note:
The above speed limits are authorized contingent upon curves and
hazards being signed with the appropriate advance Curve or warning
signs, including appropriate Speed Advisory Plates. The roadway
described above shall be reviewed for traffic control devices
impacted by the authorized speed limits before posting the signs.
Warning signs and speed limit signs shall be in accordance with the
Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 1986.
(3) White - Road Authority
(I) Pink - Central Office Traffic
{ll Blue - District Traffic Engineer
_oad Authority use only
Date traffic control devices changed implementing this authorization
I Month-Day.Year I Signature I Title
Please Signature of Traffic Engineer
Sign _
Here /2
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
DATE March 7, 1989
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY:
ITEM 26.
NO, Approve Change Orders
88-9 & 88-10
BYames E. Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve Change Order #1 for
Project 88-9 Tulip street and Project 88-10 University Avenue _
both MSA projects.
Attached is the Change Order with explanation.
* The Tulip Street project still has a storm drainage concern to
resolve. The solution will probably be the construction of a
storage area for a 100 year storm so as not to flood 2 or 3
drain fields.
We will be meeting with the ~ffected property owners soon.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,~
.'
.. alE'
_CE:
PROJECT
PROJECT NO.:
CONTRACTOR:
CHANGE ORDER NO:
2105.501 Common Excavation (Pond)
2105.535 Topsoil Borrow (CV)},
2501.511 12" RC Pipe Cu1vert'(CL IV)
2501.511,18" RC Pipe Culvert (CL V)
SP-112"PVC Pipe Culvert
2506.509 Construct Catch Basin, Design
SP-2 Furnish & Install Sluice Gate ,
2571.501 Spruce, Colorado Blue 5'
2575.505 Sod ;,
TOTAL PART I - TULIP
:'0