The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC February 7, 1989 e; DATE: <> February 7, 1989 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL . . January Building Department Report 1988 Building Department Report Letter from William Hawkins (2/1/89) Cities Bulletin (1/27/89) Letter from C.F. Smythe (1/30/89) (12/12/88) /.:z)d<;;g / /q/g1 -i- ;jq/99 Coon Creek Watershed Board of Managers Minutes : : : : : Letter from John Rodeberg, TKDA (1/18/89) : Letter from Ed Matthiesen, CCWD (1/11/89) : Memo from Gary Englund, MN Dept. of Health (1/20/89) : Memo from George Steiner, Anoka County (1/23/89) (1/5/89) : Addendum to Park & Recreation Commission Minutes : Minutes - Andover Housing & Redevelopment (1/17/89) Minutes - Regular City Council Meeting (1/17/89) Minutes - Special City Council Meeting (1/19/89) Minutes - Regular Park & Rec. Meeting (1/19/89) : : . . . . Minutes - Planning & zoning Meeting (1/24/89) : Resolution for proiect 88-5 adoptinq Assessment Roll Memo from Jim Schrantz re: Radium Tests 12/7/89) Cities Bulletin (2/3/89) Letter from A.M. Sannerud 11/31/89} T,PTTPr from rl.,o <:::mit-!.".7i"k Ii, T.inda Syu~r5on 11/26/89) Letter from Norm Schifer1 (1/31/89) : : PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR FUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. 4:) THANK YOU. o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, PROJECT NO. 88-5 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvements. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1990 and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. 3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a February regular Meeting this 7th day of , 1989 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor <:) Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY of ANDOVER MEMORANDUM Ci ty Council TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: February 7, 1989 Junk Yard Report Jim Schrantz, City Admini Jay Blake, City Planner On February 7, 1989, Dave Almgren and I visited Commercial Auto Parts to review the Ordinance 8 and Ordinance 44 violations previously cited. After several visits from Deputy Albertson and two letters from City staff, the front of Commercial Auto Parts is clean. No junk vehicles were seen on inspections conducted on the following dates: February 2, 1989 February 6, 1989 I would recommend that the license be approved as submitted. ** Note: All junk yard operators were informed that random inspections would occur over the next year. They are all aware of the pro-active enforcement policy now being used by the City. In the last several days other issues have surfaced regarding the clean-up of the junk yard district. 1) Cecil and Richard Heidelberger have been put on notice that three of their properties are public nuisances and will be cleaned up by the City, if they aren't cleaned by February 17, 1989. (See enclosed map) 2) John Imre has been sent notification that two of his properties are also nuisances. A third property is subject to a Special Use Permit revocation. The Planning and zoning Commission hearing will be held on February 28, 1989. The proper authorities will be notified. o Deputy Albertson will be present "I-, tnll i 'II> I 's 111(~pting to discuss clean up of the district. His (''.'II'_'e[[':,: i ,,'11J.<J(~ 1,lanning for the eventual clean up of the property. He will also report on his activities in the junk yard district. V ~". .p:;..~ - J"J "'l - ~{.i . 4lI\ ~ ~ '_ ,'" , ~ ~ ~'- o @ o " , , '", '" ,?( '" ~":] - ~/ ~~ <..)/ ,..,.,..... , / , , , , , I I I I I , --... --- <ll ., >- ~ \- ............ 04:: ~ _ If) ,'" 0 ~ UJ ~~ -t,() ~ \ -1\ , -" '-- " "'-..--- -------- ~/.p ../.,+ . ------...... " - - --- i I \ \ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~~ pr.<Yff plUi"'P? \ ............ "". I: I ~ ~ .-<1''' ~ ~o_,_.L ;~ I: 1 \ ...1 ....--- ~ = i i~' " " /. , ~ , {;: --.. h \;\- ,,~ ~{~ ~" ~ ~ .~ ~ ~....~ ., .;:t '~ll''; "': r... ~~.~ 1 : \ ... ~'l " \ , , '+ , , .::> .8.5"'" , , \ , \ , I , I '" , '" " \ ~ I " "-.j , , - , \ , , , , , \ , I \ I , J 4\ . I I , , , ----- .. , . \ \ . , " ~ -- , , , \ , I I ; . I \ I , I I . \ , , / , J , , ... "I' , \ \ , , I , , " . I ....--., , , I I I I \ \ i , \ \ @ \ III i..:", :~ I "It:_ \ " , , , , " , " ..- -'" ~ ~" " ----- [ '.) '\ ~ }~ ~i~ t'\,~ ~ --.... - ~ -.. , o o . February 7, 1989 TO: City Council James E. Schrantz FROM: RE: Radium Tests ~ Attached is a copy of the test results from the last tests the City had taken at the 3 well sites. Wells #1 & 2 are higher than those previously reported, but Well #3 looks relatively good as it is just over the 5 qCi/L. The Health Department has received information from EPA where they are indicating the new regulations will be 5 for each of the 226 and 228 whereas now the combined 226 & 227 can't exceed 5. o S"r.>ole Tvne (;u~i~~. ';"'llected [lv i'",. J t ~0~'L'..J5l;.{ ''1' SOTA :JEPART".ENT OF liE;,;"-;-1l P.AOIi\TI0:1 AHALYSIS KII.olr/7?--> .'?- JAN 3 0 1989 ( , ,-J '3\1dCl~t l~i1>l-\ -'-I 0 (..('~""L 'j'0...It~/Coun ty qenQrt":"o /;,..\-G,fl(, 1 2 3 I11v I>Ji/G:'( l-~ IA , . ^ , ~ Jl Received l-c;-8~ O'lte Repartee Gross Alohaeo ~adi um Alph 0 Ur.anium Al1;>ha . ~Ol? ~adl.um-228 Radon I r;ross Beta I I Tritium ! St::ontium-CjO ! 1:o~ine-131 Cesiun-l37 I S tron ti um-89 CesiUJ'l-134 ! b I S"I'\ole Location ."\ ) d,)0.L -$ \ u . \ . "7 ., ~o ::> " '1 ! I . ..\ , . i3, .-' J. .~ 4 51 I I . , I ! I' , , T----r~-~-I--------] Qesul~s reoorten as cCi/l 6/32 ,-4 . o o CITIES NOTIFIED OF RADIUM ABOVE EPA STANDARDS CITY MAP INDEX POPULATION 1980 c.ensus 9378 399 3257 - 3718 2663 129 678 739 783 963 286 1240 Andover 15J MA Courtland/Nicol let Co. 19H Savage 17J MA LaCrescent 20 0 Jordan 181 Ihlen/Pipestone Co. 20B Harris/Cisco Co. 14K Henderson 181 Heron Lake/Jackson 21E Hinckley 13K New Market 18J Howard Lake 16H Minnesota Department of Transportation 1987-1988 Official Highway Map. o League of Minnesota Citi Cities Bull Number 4 League discusses priorities with legislative leaders February 3, 1989 /0 C,c.. ,/7/8'1 .-- League staff met last week with House Speaker Robert Vanasek (DFL-New Pragne) and Senate Majority Leader Roger Moc (DFL- Erskine) to discuss cities, legislative priorities for the 1989 session. Priority eoncerns include property tax relief funding, tax increment fi- nance, truth in taxatiou, levy limits, compa- rable worth, land use, year of the city propos- als, and transportation funding. The need for adequate additional state funding for property tax relief programs, such as local government aid was one area League staff stressed. They were critical of the rela- tively small amount of funds which the gover- nor's budget has eannarked for additional property tax relief. Staff also presented the findings and recommendations of the League's coordinating committee report on property tax issues to Represcntative Vanasek and Seuator Moe. (See next week's Bulletiu for a summary of the report.) Both legislative leaders ackuowledged that the Legislature will take a close look at the property tax law and will likely dedicate more than the $100 million the governor recom- mended for property tax refonn. "The bottom line is we do not want property tax increases in 1990," said Senator Moe. Rep, Vanasek pledged that the process for considering the tax bill (particularly the tax conference committee) will be much more See Priorities, page 3 o Above: House Speaker Robert Vanasek and LMC Executive Director Don Slater. BelolV:LMC Legislative Represelllative Laurie Hacking and Senate Majority Leader Roger Moe. Photos by Debra Nyberg, Action Alert There are no action alerts this week. Contents Page Articles League discusses priorities with legislative leaders ,................................................1 Governor signs debt limit bill ................,......,.......3 LMC Coordinating Committee issues report on property taxes for the 1989 session ..................4 Rep. Jefferson introduces housing impact statement bills ...............,.............,.............7 Federal Update Bonding authority under discussion ....................Fl (inside back cover) Bill Summaries ....................,......... ................................S 1 (yellow sheets) Hearing: The Senate Elections and Ethics Committee will hear testimony on S.P. 5 (Marty), the proposal to establish a code of ethics for all public officials, on Wednesday, February 8, in Room 107 State Capitol, 11:30 a.m. - 1 p.m. AH The Cities Bulletin is a publication of the League of Minnesota Cities and includes an update of state legislative, administrative, and congressional actions that affect cities. It also includes reviews of metropolitan area issues by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. o League legislative staff members are available to answer your questions concerning legislation relating to cities. The Bulletin lists League and AMM authors of articles and bill summaries by their initials, Joel Jamnik -- JJ Laurie Fiori Hacking -- LFH Stanley Peskar -- SP Ann Higgins -- AH Donald Slater -- DS Sarah Hackett -- SH Chuck Bichler -- ell Thomas Grundhoefer -- TG Debra Nyberg -- DN Jean Mehle Goad -- JMG Vern Peterson -- VP Roger Peterson -- RP ., i o page 2 LMC Cities Bulletin . Priorities, continued o "open and accessible" than it has been in past years. Vanasek commented that the Lcague's coordinating committce report will be "hclpfnl" and wiII get "full" con- sidcration. He urged League staff to thoroughly brief Tax Committee mem- bers on the report's recolluncndations. Senator Moe listened to League con- cerns that the Legislature abolish levy limits in light oCthc new truth in taxation requiremcnts, Moe stated, "Once we get through this period of making major" adjustments to our property tax struc- ture, then we can consider makiug changcs in the levy limit law." Governor signs debt limit bill On Monday, January 30, Governor Perpich signed into law H.F. 4O,legisla- tion to correct a city debt limit problem the 1988 omnibus tax biII causcdo The House had unanimously approved the bill on Monday, January 23 and the full Scnate approved it Thursday, January 26. This legislation corrects an uninten- tional oversight in last year's tax bill that has been preventing many citics from is- suing bonds because they were over legal debt limits, The problem was due to the tax bill redefining "assessed value" as "tax capacity." The old assessed values aregcnerally 12 to 13 times greater than the new tax capacities. Hence, thc old debt limits (such as. thc sevcn and ouc- third percent of asscssed value) wcre far morc constraining than the Lcgislature intcndcd. Thc new law wiII correct this prob- lem by converting thc caleulation of dcbtlimits to a system based on markct o vaIuc, rathcr than tax capacity, This convcrsion will yicld roughly thc cquiva- lent dcbtlimits, although thcre may be variations for individual cities. Thc new debt limits are: * two perccnt of market value (in- stead of scvcn and onc-third pcrccnt of asscsscd valuc) for the general debt limit affecting sccond, third, and fourth class citics; * 0.03 pcrccnt of markct value (instead of 0.1 pcrccnt of assessed value) for capitalnotcs that homc rulc chartcr citics issuc; * 0,25 perccnt of markct value (instcad of onc pcrccnt of assessed valuc) for capital notes that statutory or homc rulc chartcr citics issuc., If a spcciallaw or city chartcr limits thc amount of debt a city incurs to a statcd perccntagc of asscssed valuc then thc city must multiply the old debt limit Lcaguc staff also rcconuneuded to Senator Moc that thcre bc uo further re- strictions in cities, abilities to use tax in- crcment finance which is onc of the only remaining economic devclo(Jmenttools available to citieso LFH pcrcentage by 12 to dctcnninc thc uew dcbt limit applicablc to gross tax capac- ity. Disparityaid. H.F. 40 wiII also make a changc in the distribution of disparity reduction aid for payable 1989 which would have givcn some communities more disparity aid thanlcgislators origi- nally intendcd. Thc corrcction provides that if a community recciving disparity rcduction aid has a tax capacity rate of Icss than 90 pcrccnt, the disparity aid paymcnts would dccrcasc in order to bring that ratc up to 90 perccnt. The revenuc dcpartmcnt has not yet bccn abIc to cstimatc how many communities this provision might affcct. Tax incremcnt tcchnical corrections. Thc new law will also makc ccrtain cffcctivc datc corrcctions in tax incre- mcnt law. It will climinate the 0.45 per- cent adjustmcnt in the original tax ca- pacity ratc (original mill rate) alTecting TIP districts cities cstablished in I9g8. Lilli Febnmry 3,1989 page 3 LMC Coordinating Committee issues report on property taxes for the 1989 session The League's Coordinating Com- mittee on Property Taxes will release this week a comprehensive report which analyzes Minnesota's new property tax law and makes policy recommendations to the Legislatnre for improving that law. All cities will receIve a copy of the full report. The League organized the 20-member Property Tax Coordinating Conunittee last fall to research property tax issnes and develop common policies to recommend to the Legislatnre during the 1989 legislative session. Althongh the Legislature enacted major changes in the state's property tax laws last year, further significant changes will be likely in 1989. It is extremely im" portant that cities work together to shape those changes and insure that they are in the best interests of all cities and prop- erty taxpayers. Background on project The League of Minnesota Cities Co- ordinating Committee project was an in- tensive research effort and policy dis- cussion of property tax issues that began in September 1988. The committee that directed the rcsearch included rcpresen- tatives of the League of Minnesota Cit- ies, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, the Asso- ciation of Metropolitan Municipalities, the Municipal Legislative Commission, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cit- ies, and the Minnesota Association of Small Cities. ,/ The committee retained the law finn of Briggs and Morgan to produce its report (excerpts follow) and to provide research and related consulting services. The purpose ofthe effort was to analyze the property tax law for 1990, discnss related property tax issues, and develop some specific recommendations and proposals for change. The initial objectives of the League Coordinating Committee project were to analyze the law for 1990, discuss and negotiate objectives, and develop spe- cific recommendations and two specific proposals for changing the property tax law, One of these proposals was to in- clude a state-paid homestead credit. The definition of the projects' objectives to inclnde two separate proposals--one with and one without a state-paidbomestead crcdit--iIIustrates one of the fundamen- tal policy differences between the par- ticipants in the project. Some of the city groups believed that a state-paid homestead credit was essential, and would not participate un- less a homestead credit system was one ofthe alternatives to be developed. Other participants in the project were unwill- ing to concede that a state-paid home- stead credit was essential before even beginning the research and negotiation process. As a result, the project was initiated with dual objectives. Major areas of disagreement among the participants focused on the priorities for property tax relief and the preferred mechanisms for providing relief. For example, some of the cities advocated relief for mid and higher valued homes as the highest priority in 1990. Tbese cities also believed that new programs to target state-paid property tax relief di- rectly to homeowners should be an importanl stmetural clement of any new property tax system. Other participants emphasized re- lief for businesses and apartments as the highest priority, and tax base eqnaliza- tion programs that targeted state money to communities with low tax bases as an important method for providing that relief. A third major priority some of the participants expressed was retaining the existiug local government aid (LGA) fOffimla and the projected LGA increases for 1990. o Results of the project The committee never fully resolved the major issues that divided the city groups at the beginning of the project. However, the research and extensive discussions and negotiations were valu- able in helping cities clarify and better define these differences. This better understanding of the issues should hclp cities be more effective participants dur- ing the legislative process, Early in December the consultant developed a new concept that included a homestead aid that wonld provide prop- erty tax relief directly to homeowners. For various reasons the committee de- cided to foens on this approach. Despite this general agreement about the direc- tion of the remaining research, partici- pants did not resolve the fundamental issues about the priorities for tax relief and the allocation of state money among the major system components. Analysis of 1990 law The analysis of the 1990 law raised several concerns that allmcmbers of the committee shared. For example, the rednced level of fundiug for property tax relief in 1990, and the freezing of ai(1 programs were problems that the par- ticipants agreed needed correction. A second area of shared concern fo, ensed on transition aid and its vulnera- bility to funding cuts or reallocation for other purposes. Although the partici- pants agreed that some change to transi- tion aid would be desirable, it was much more difficult to agree on the kinds of changes. The report's analysis of the 1990 law indicated the following conclusions: 1. Impact on tax burdens. Despite .-." the major stmctural changes in the sys- tem that will take effect in 1990, theo page 4 LMC Cities Bulletin . ; I 00"_1 o o impact on property tax bnrdcns is rcla- tivcly modcst for most types ofpropcrty. Gcncrally, tax burdcns statcwidc would incrcase by about onc pcrccnt to two perccnt duc to thc changcs from 1989 to 1990. Thc only propertics to benefit significantly are modcrate value homcs ($60,000 to $100,000 in value) in high tax-rate areas (over 95 perccnt of tax capacity). These homes bencfit from the 1990 system because of thc removal of the homestcad credit maximum. Taxcs on farms would also increase substan- tially under the 1990 law. Apparently thc Legislature did not intend this im- pact and will probably correct the prob- lem this year. 2. Ueduced funding. Total statc funding for property tax relief, exclud- ing school aids, will decrease by ap- proximately $57 million under the 1990 law compared to the level of funding in 1989. This will result in a $57 million tax increase in addition to nOlmallocal levy increases that are likely to occur in 1990. This amount includes the esti- mated $30 million unintendcd increasc in farm taxes, If the Legislature increases thc funding for property tax relicf in I 990, the changes and the distribution of additional money will changc thc tax burden impacts in 1990. The tablc (below) shows thc rcduc- tion in total statc funding for propcrty tax relief. This net reduction is duc to thc change from the homestead and agricul- lllral credits to the new transition aid program for taxcs payable in 1990. This rcduction in state-paid property tax re- 'licf will result in an increase in net prop- erty taxeso If local levies increase be- twcen 1989 and 1990, this rcduction in state-paid propcrty tax relicf will add to thc tax incrcascs for property taxpaycrs. The total cost for the major compo- nents of the propcrty tax rclicf system, excluding cducation aids, is approxi- mately $1.2 billion for taxes payablc in 1989, A five percent inflationary in- crcase in state funding for those pro- grams would rcsult in a $60 million in, crcase in state fnnding instead of a $57 million rcduction. 3, Frozen aid programs. Disparity rcduction aid is frozen at 19891evcls and transition aid calculations are bascd on 1989 levies and then frozen for future ycars. The 1990 systcm will not rcspond to locallcvy increases or the incrcasing nced for propcrty tax relicf as thc cost of local govcrnmcnt incrcascs, Under the new systcm, the Legisla- ture willnccd to increasc the appropria- tion for statc-paid propcrty tax rclicf cach year and dctcnninc how to distrib- ute that increascd state moncy. Except for thc LGA fonnula, there is not an automatic mcehanism for distributing incrcascd propcrty tax rclief, Unless thc state puts additional money into the system each year, net property taxcs will in, crease much faster than inflation. 4. Built in tax burden shifts. Al- though the amount of statc-paid prop- erty tax relicf docs not automatically increase each year, the amount of relief for homeowners will increase as levies and market valucs increase. However. to the extcnt that thc state docs not pay for this increased relicf for homeowners, tax burdcns wiII shift to other typcs of propcrty. These shifts are built into thc 1990 law through thc guarantccd homc- Estbnated ebange In slale nlluUng for properly lax relier (l'ayable 1990 compared /0 payable 1989) Transilion Aid vs. lIomeslead and Agricultural Credits -$ 90.0 million Local Governmenl Aid + 32.2 million Welfare Takeover + .4 million 1989,1990 Net Change -$ 57.4 million Note: These figures are estimates based on an analysis oflbe 1990 law using 1988 data. 11,e change in funding estimated using 1989 data could be somcwhat differcnt. Property tax relief costs for payable 1989 and 1990 come oul oflbe s",lc's 1990091 bicnnial budgct. Education aids are nol included in Ibe analysis. February 3, 1 QQ9 stcad credit, transition aid, and net lax capacily. This impact of Ihe 1990 law was probably not wcU understood at the limc the law passed. The Coordinating COllunillee ex- amined Ihc option of restoring the hOIlIl:- slead credit in 1990. l11c analysis showed thaI thc major bencficiarics of resloring Ihc homcstead crcdit ~vould bc nono homestead properties. The bcnefits.Jo businesses and othcr non-homcslead prop- ertics would increasc as local levies incrcasc. Thc rcport indicatcs thallaxes for busincsscs, apartrncnt~. and and othcr types of non-homcstcad property would increase mnch more rapidly under the 1990 law Ihan nndcr Ihc 1989 home- stcad ercdit system with thc same levy increasc. 5. Complexity. TIlc systcm for taxe~ payable in 1990 is complcx and difficult to modcl accuratcly. Thc law has added many ncw mcthods 10 adjust lax burdens and altcr the distribution of state IIIoney. Most of thcsc new mcthods do not pro- vidc a clear and visiblc relationship bctwcen thc new slatc money in the syslcm and the resultiug impact on tax burdcns. For cxamplc, increased stalc money to pay for homeowner relid Ihrongh the guaranteed homestead credit would rcsult in propcrty tax reductiollS primarily for non-homestcad properties. 6. Tax base impact~. The usc of net tax capacities rathcr Ihan gross lax ca- pacities in the I990 law will reducc the lax basc of local govcrnmcnts thaI have homcstead or agricullural property. The rcport showed Ihat cOlJlmunities wilh a high proportion of agricultural value or homcstcad valuc below $6R,OOO will see morcofa rcduction in their tax base than communities Ihat havc a large amount of other typcs of propcrty. This change in the 1990 law would aeecntuate exisling tax base differences among conlllluni- ties. Thc Legislaturc designcd Iransilion aid for 1990 to compensatc local gov- crnmcnts for Ihis reduction in tax base. Howcvcr, lransition aid calculations arc bascd on 1989 Icvies and thcn frozeu. Although transition aid will compensate - - ~ p~'.? f", local governments for the rednction in tax base for levies np to the 1989 level, there is no compensation for the loss of tax base for levies above the 1989 level. Therefore, the change to net tax capaci- ties will make it even harder forcommu- nities with low taxable wealth to raise additional property tax revenues. The change to net tax capacities will have a relatively smaller impact on communi- ties that already have a large tax base, Major issues The cities involved in the. League coordinating committee project shared many concerns about the I990 law. For example, the law freezes most of the aid programs for 1990 and reduces some from 1989 levels. The city officials in- volved in the project were concerned about the implications of this for the state's continuing commitment to pro- viding property tax relief. A second major area of agreement was to eliminate transition aid and real- locate the state's property tax relief funding among other programs, such as homestead relief targeted direclly to home- owners, a tax base equalization aid, and local govenuncnt aid (LGA). This change could provide for eliminating the lower net tax capacities on homes and assure that the amount of tax relief for home- owners IIlat shows on the tax statement would be equal to the amount of relief the state pays for. Although the city groups involved in the coordinating committee shared many concerns, there were also differ- ences IIlat needed discussion and nego- tiation. For example, some of the par- ticipants felt that providing additional . relief in 1990 for moderate and high - value homes was a very high priority. Other cities emphasized the need for an ongoing program to provide tax base equalization and relief for busi- nesses and apartment properties. Finally, some but not all, of the representatives on the committee felt that the distribu- tion of additional state-paid property tax relief between the metropolitan and non- metropolitan areas of the state was an important issue. The researeh and diseussions dur- ing the coordinating committee meet- ings often focused on IIlese issues. The following generallxllicy recommenda- tions reflect the positions and priorities of the various groups. Although each of the participants may support these pol- icy reconunendations, the priorities vary among the groups involved, Some is- sues, such as the distribution of state money between the metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of the state, are not part of the policy recommendations because city officials could not reach a general agreement on that issue. A second major issue the commit- tee discussed but did not inclnde in the policy recommendations is the appro- priate tax base forcalcnlating education aids and levies. Some of the eities in- volved believe that education aids cal- culations should be based on net tax capacities. Others believed that gross tax capacity is tile appropriate tax base measure. Unless the Legislature changes the current law, tile education aid fommlas will switch from gross to net tax capaci- ties in 1991, causing some tax burdeu shifts. An analysis of this is included in the report. The League's policy recom- mendations would result in eliminating the differences between net and gross tax capacities for homes. That would largcly eliminate this issue. For this reason, there is no need to address this issue in the context of the report and the League Coordinating Committee recommendations. PoliCY recommendations Level of state funding I. Total state funding for property tax relief should increase at least at the rate of inflation to prevent net property tax burdens from increasing at a much more rapid rate. For taxes payable in 1990, state funding for property tax re- lief programs other than education aids should be at least five percent higher than the funding for those property tax relief programs in 1989. Property Tax Hurdens 2. The difference between tax bur- dens on high value homes and tax bur, dens on low value homes should he reduced. This should be accomplished by reducing taxes on higher valued homes, but without increasing tax hurdens on low valued homes. It would be desirable to eliminate or reduce the difference between the split classifications for home- steads. o 3. Property tax relief for business property is important for 1990. AI, though the property tax changes for 1989 provided some relief for businesses in Greater Minnesota, there is still signifi- cant variation in tax burdens, and busi- ness property taxes are generally too high. 4. Property tax burdens on non- homestead residential and apartment buildings should be reduced from their current high levels. High property taxes on these properties, combined with the impact of federal tax and housing policy chauges, discourage maintenance and in some areas of the state may result in a shortage of affordable housing. 5. Faml property taxes should not be increased due to chauges in the prop' erty tax system, However, reductions in faml taxes are not a high priority in 1990. Structure of the property tax system 6. The amount of relief provided to homeowners and shown on the property tax statement should be equal to the amount of relief paid for by the state. The mechanisms, for providing relief for homeowners should be visible and un, derstandable to the taxpayer, to loeal government officials and to legislators. 7. Programs such as transition aid that do not have a c1earrationale and that are not easily U1xlerstood should be elimi- nated. If transition aid is eliminated, other adjustments to the property tax system should oeeur as needed to pre- veul large tax increases or tax burden shifts, .-.\ o page 6 LMC Cities Bulletin o o 8. With the elimination of transition aid, the state's property tax relief fund- ing, inclnding any increased funding, should be reallocated to assure accept- able outcomes for taxpayers and local govenunents. For example, funding could be divided among the following major types of programs: a. A homestead relief program designed to provide relief directly to homeowners (this should be combined with tile elimination of the lower net tax capacities on homes); b. A new tax base equalization pro- gram to help equalize the ability of local governments to finance local govern- mentservices;and c. Local government aid increases at the 1990 levels or above distribnted through the cnrrent or a new local gov- ernment aId formula. The combination of programs, their structure, and the allocation of funding among those programs should be based on state policy objectives, desired tax- payer outcomes, and tile amount of state money available, 9. Disparity reduction aid amounts should be grandfathered. Future programs to reduce disparities should rely on tax base eqnalization or other fornllllas, such as homestead aid or LGA, rather than additional tax rate equalization or tax rate buydowns. 10. The state take-over of county welfare costs should not be considered as an element of the property tax relief system even though it may provide some property tax relief. The impact of a state takeover of connty welfare costs on prop- erty taxes should not be considered nn- less counties are required to reduce their levies to reflect additional state funding. Property tax relief money should not be reallocated to pay for county welfare costs. II. The potential state take-over of county court costs should not be consid- ered a property tax issue or a propclty tax relief program, The impact of a state take-over of county court costs ou prop- crty taxes should not he considercd un- Icss counties are rClJuired to rcduce thcir levics to reflcct the additional state fund- ing. Property tax relicf moncy should not be reallocated to pay for county court costs. Levy limits and truth in taxation' 12. Truth In taxation may help citi- zens become better infonlled about the uses of their property tax dollars. Truth. in taxation should be extended to the state so that citizens are also infonned about tile impact of state decisions on their property tax burdens. 13. Levy limits are not an appropri- ate method for the state to reduce future property taxes or to prevent property tax increases. Elimination of levy limits should he considered if othcr less arbi- trary W;IYS can be found to assure that increased state aid actually provides property tax relief to taxpayers. Rep. Jefferson introduces housing impact statement bills Rep. Richard Jefferson (DFL-Mpls.) introduced legislation that would require state and local units of govemment to prepare and publish a housing impact statement for review and cornment by the public prior to the acquisition, demo- lition, or conversion of five or more units of low-income or vacaut housiug. The housing impact statement would nced to include: * identification of each low-income housing unit to be displaced including location, rent, number of residents, con- dition of the unit, and ownership; * analysis of availability of low- income housing units including unit size, vacancy rates, and level of supply and demand; * <Ietenllination of whetllCr the snpply of available and vacant low-income housing is adequate to meet the demand for all sizes oflow-income housing units in the city; and * estimate of the cost of replace- ment of unit sizes with comparable rents to replace displaced units for which in- sufficient supply exists at comparable rental rates. Unless there is an adequate supply of available and vacant low-income housing to meet the demand for all unit sizes of low-income housing, units of government would need to replace dis- placed nnits if project activities elimi- nate five or more units. In so doing, the proposal would require officials to as- sure that such replacement units are sufficient to house tile same number of people that could have occupied the displaced units. They would also need to assure comparable rental rates, a cap on on rent increases, and construction standards. Such units must be availahle within six months of demolition or con- vcrsion of the original units and must be within five miles of the original site at a location that is not less convenient to places of employment and public facili- tics than the previous units. Underthe bill, the record of prescr- vation of low-ineomc housing by a unit of govcrumcnt would be a factor in awarding of state tax-exempt borrowing authority and statc funds for cconomic development and housing programs. Enforcement provisions would al- low civil actions for enforcement of thc housing impact statement and replace, ment housing requirements by any resi- dent, government unit, or organization within the state. All Fl~~~~llary 3, 1989 p~"" 7 o o Courts/Crime Sexual criminal conduct: Statute of limitations H,F.154 (Lasley, Vellenga) (Judi- ciary) would remove the seven-year statute of limitations on sexual criminal con- duct if the victim was under thc age of 18. CB Contraband or drug seizures H.F.159 (Dawkins, Clark, Krueger, Marsh, Kelly) (Judiciary) would require that when contraband ordrugs are seized on residential rental property, the land, lord, after notice of the first occurrence, bring an unlawful detainer action against the tenant. The bill provides that, in absence of an unlawful detainer, a lien of $3,000 be assessed against the property for a second offense, and would allow a forfeiture for a tbird offense, The bill would require certified mail notice to landlords, CB J>l"Ostitution, probable cause, penalties H.F.160 (Dawkins, Jefferson, Marsh, O,Connor, Kelly) (Judiciary) would define acts constituting probable cause relating to prostitution. The bill would make soliciting for prostitution in residential areas a gross misdemeanor for the first offense and a felony for any subsequent offense. The bill would al- low, on a second conviction, forfeiture of motor vehicles the defendant used while practicing prostitution. CB Controlled substance distribution at schools H.F.163 (Dawkins, Kelly, Marsh, Carruthers, O,Connor) (Judiciary) would increase penalties for unlawful distribu- tion of controlled substances on school premises, at bus stops, or enroute to or from sehool. The bill would make pos- session and usc of a dangerous weapon while involved in an unlawful controlled Bill Summaries substance transaction a separate crime, and would require the attorney general to draft and disseminate a plain lan- guage version of these laws. CB Controlled substance distribution to minors H.F. 164 (McLaughlin) (Judici- ary) would increase penalties for unlaw- ful distribution of controlled substances to minors in public parks, on school premises, at bus stops, or enroute to or from school. The bill would make pos- session and use of a dangerous weapon while involved in an unlawful controlled substance transaction a separate crime, and would require the attorney general to draft and disseminate a plain lan- guage version of these laws. CB Dance statl!te S.F.300 (Hughes) (General Legis- lation and Public Gaming) would rcpeal the dance statute sections which regn- late dance halls, pennit requirements, irrullodest dancing or dancing in the dark, hour limitations, and police attendance requirements. CB Crimes: Sentences and penalties S.F.314 (D. Peterson, Stumpf, Spear, Pogemiller) (Judiciary) would increase the minimum parole eligibility date t025 years for persons serving a life sentence for first degree murder. The bill would increase violent crime sen- tences, and inclCasc criminal history points for serious offenders and disapprove de- creases in criminal history points for certain property and nonviolent crimes. The bill would inclCase maximum fines and penalties for possession of cxplo- si ves, failurc to rcport an accident caus- ing serious injury, various assault and manslaughter offenses, fourth dcgree criminal sexual conduct, perjury, fiee- ing peace officers, bribery, and negli- gently causing a fire. The bill would increase penalties for dangerous and career criminals. CB February 3, l?!t) Crime victims S.F.315 (D. Peterson, Pogemiller, Merriam, Morse) (Judiciary) would al- low civil actions based on personaHn- jury due to scxual abuse to begin two years after the abuse or two years after the victim knew oCthe injury, whichever is later. The bill would require that vic- tims who request information on of- fender release be notified of conditions of release and the identity of the super- vising corrections agent. The bill would require an attempt at oral notice to the victinl prior to pretrial detention release of person accused of criminal sexual conduct, with a follow-up wrillen uo- tice. CB Criminal sexual control S.F.320 (Spear, Cohen, D, Peter- son, Marty) (Jndiciary) would provide intensive sex offender treatment pro- grams within the correctional system, and specialized probation and correc- tion agents to supervise released sex offenders. The bill would require the collection of data on the trcatment and recidivism rates of conVicted sex of- fenders, and would extend jurisdiction of the juvenile court over offenders until they arc 21. The bill would require the bureau of criminal apPlChension to de- velopunifonn procedures for the collec, tion and analysis of DNA typing evi- dence, providing for the admissibility of such evidence. The bill would increase penalties for criminal sexual conduct offenses, and permit courts to sentence dangerous or patterned sex offenders to longer periods of incarceration and snper- vision. The bill would create a legisla- tive commission to stndy the child pro- tection system, and would appropriate money for the development of a DNA profiling laboratory and for a public information campaign against sexu:,1 violence, CB Sl Economic development County economic development authority S.FA8 (Vickerman, Morse, DeCra- mer) (Economic Development & Hous- ing) would extend to counties the ability to establish economic development au- thorities. Requires city approval only in cities which have either port authorities or economic development authorities. Companion H.F.7l. SH Elections and ethics Fundraising S.F.245 (Hughes) (Elections & Ethics) would prohibit any individual campaign fund raising events dnring regnlar legislative sessions. AH Finance and revenue Park trailers H.F.l29 (D. Carlson) (faxes) would require park trailers (up to 400 square feet and used as temporary housing) to be registered as motor vehieles. The bill provides that unregistered trailers are subject to personal property taxes. Companion S.F.38. SH Public library materials and vehicles H.F.144 (Trimble, Quinn, Rest, Pauly) (Taxes) would exempt from the sales tax materials, equipment, services, and facilities a public library uses. The bill would also exempt a vehicle pur- chased for use as a bookmobile from the tax. SH Property tax refund H.F.199 (Valento, Henry, Pellow, Stanius, Tjomhom) (faxes) would change ,/ the schedule for property tax and renter's credit refunds, The bill wonld raise the income limit to $40,000 (currently $35,000) and lower the percent paid by the claimant to 50 percent (currently 60 percent). Effective for rent paid in 1989 and property taxes paid in 1990, and thereafter. SH nank letters of credit for local governments H.F.279 (Blatz, Battaglia, Janezich, Carruthers, Henry) (Local Govenunent & Metropolitan Affairs) would allow contractors to provide an irrevocable bank letter of credit to be used in lieu of a perfoffilance bond when doing work for a home rule or statutory city, county, town, school district, or other local govenunent authority. SH Agricultural homestead classification H.F.284 (Sparby, Cooper, E. Olson, Dauner, Redalen) (Taxes) would allow agricultural homesteads to include non- contiguous agricultural land that is 10- c?t.ed no more than two townships or cllles away provided that the house and garage arc located in annnincorporated area. The bill would extend the classifi- cation to include people who hold vested remainder interests and reside on class 2a agricultural land. SH Production materials H.F.293 (Welle, Scheid, Dauner, Dempsey, Schreiher) (Taxes) would excmpt the gross receipts of electricity, gas, water, or steam from sales tax when used for the sale, storage, use, or con- snmption of taxable services. Services i1~clude laundry and dry cleaning, ve- ~lcle washing, janitorial services, detec- ttve and security services, pet grooming, and lawn and garden services. SH Unmarked vehicles S.F.205 (Stmllpf, Doug Johnson) (Taxes & Tax Laws) would allow the commissioner of revenue to provide unmarked vehicles for the department of revenue, and "undercover license plates" (protected registrations) for vehicles registered to state agencies. SH Open space property S.F.207 (Ramstad, Benson) (faxes & Tax Laws) wonld extend the open space classification to baseball, softball, and soccer fields, Effective for taxes levied in 1989. Companion H.F.I55, SH General government Health coverage for the uninsured H.F.l50 (Ogren) (HealUl & I-hunan Services) would create a state program to provide affordable hea lth care covcr- ag~ for the approximately 400,000 ~1I1nesotans who do not have any health 1I1surance or other health care coverage. The bill would apply to all local govern, ments and their employees. o The bill wonld create a conunis- sion of health care professionals and state ageucy commissioncrs to implc- ment and administer the hcalUJ care access program which would have to mcel cer- tainlllinilllum benefit rcquircmcnts. The commission would have certain regula- tory powers of health care carriers or insnrers. The bill would establish a sliding fee for detemlining how much each participant must pay and would impose a payroll tax equal to four tenths of one percent of taxable wages paid to em- ployees less a credit for employers which offer specified levels of health carc coverage and pays at least 70 perccnt of the premiums. The bill would imposc a similar tax on the self-employcd. SH Subsidized housing H.F.273 (Jeffcrson, Clark) (Finan, cial Institutions & Housing) would rc- quire the owners of subsidized housing units to give tenants at least a two-year notice of intent to sell the units. CB Housing impact statements H.F.275 (Jefferson, Clark) (Finan- cial Institntions & Housing) would re- quire housing impact statements before displacement of certain low-income housing. The bill would require state government units to replace certain dis- placed low-income housing, and include preservation oflow-income honsing as a factor in awarding state tax-exempt bonding authority and funds from eco- nomic development and housing pro- grams. (See, "Rep. Jefferson introduces honsing impact statements bill," this issue.) CB o 82 LMC Cities Bulletin I o o Nursing home reimbursements H.F.305 (Gruenes, Dorn, Gutknecht) would provide that nursing home reimbursement rates for cities of the second class be equal to the rates for the metropolitan area. CB Obscenity, civil remedies H.F.314 (Swenson, Camlthers, Vellenga, Wagenius, Kelly) (Judiciary) would provide for ci vii enforcement of obscenity statutes. The bill would allow pemlanent injunctive relief and civil penalties of up to $1,000 in addition to criminal penalties. CB Replica firearms S.F.208 (Dahl, Luther, Solon, Spear) (Commerce) would prohibit the sale of replica fireanns with the exception of certainnon-fuing replicas. TIle bill would allow manufacturing, distribution, or sale for export, of replica fireanns for theat- rical prodnctions, certified athletic events, military and civil defense activities, and public displays in schools. The bill would require appropriate warning la- bels, and civil penalties of up to $10,000 (now $5(0) for violations. CB Electrical utilities, certificate of need S.F.292 (Marty, Frank) (Public Utilities & Energy) would pr<jhibit elec- tric utilities from charging customcrs for electricity generated in an out-of,state plant that would have 80,000 kilowatts or more of its capacity dedicated to serve Minnesota customers, unless the plant has obtained a certificate of need. CB Contract performance bonds S.F.3Ol (Freeman, Belanger) (Local & Urban Government) would allow contractors or local public contracts to provide an irrcvoc.able bank letter of credit in lieu of any required perform- ance bond. The biII would require the letter to be in the same amount and subject to the same conditions of the bond. CB Applicants, financial information S.F.302 (Belanger, Freeman) (Judiciary) would make financial infor- mation submitted by an applicant to a licensing agency private data. CB Noxious weed and plant pest control S.F,319 (Bcrg) (Agriculture & Rural Development) would recodify the nox- ious weed control laws to include plant pest control and would specify responsi- bility for certain cont~ol programs, in- spection programs, funding provisions, ~nd enforcement. The biII would estab- lish a grasshopper control program in grasshopper control zones, and would provide a 50 percent cost-share reim- bursement to private landowners for approved grasshopper control method costs. The bill would make appropria- tions to provide for experimental control programs. CB Pensions and retirement Minneapolis employees retirement fund (MI<:RF) H.F.125 (Nelson) (Govemmental Operations) would define MERFs sal- ary to inelude lump sum back pay pro- vided under a collective bargaining agree- ment executed aCler the expiration of a prior agreement. The bill defines final average salary as the average of any five years in the final ten years of service. CB "!tule of 85" H,F.145 (Sarna, Williams. Si- moneau, Knickerbocker, Janezich) (Labor,Management Relations) would give employing units with employees covered by MSRS, PERA, TRA, or the first e1ass cities teachers retiremcnt as- sociations, the option to offer retirement without reducing benefits under a rule of 85 (age plus years of eligible service total at least 85). The bill wonld limit the option to employees with medically certified disabilities, employees that belong to an occupational class which the local governing board has reduccd in numbers, or to employccs where the employer has detennined that savings or improvements in productivity will result from early retirement. The bill would require employer -unit contributions to cover increases in reqnired reserves necessary to support the iocn:asc in alUllIity resulting from the early retirements. The early retirement option would not be negotiable for purposes of collcctive bargaining. CB Fe1""1rV 3 ~ Ost9 Lump sum payments S.F.153 (Waldorf, D. Moe, Po- gemiller, Morse, Rennckc) (Govcmlllcn- tal Operations) would appropriate over $11 million to various retiremcnt funds for post-retirement lump smll paymcnts of $25 pcr ycar of servicc in 1989 and 1990 for pre-1973 retirees, for ccrtain rctired or disabled public employees or their surviving spouse. CB Robbinsdale volunteer firefighters S.F.183 (Reichgoll) (GoverlUllcn- tal Operations) would exclude Roh- binsdale volunteer firefighters from the definition of publie employee for retire- ment coverage. The bill would exempt volunteer firefighters from fnture con- tributions to PERA and would allow a refnnd for past contributions. Rohbinsdale wonld bc the third such city to exclude their volunteer firelightcrs from thc definition of public employec. CB Association of townships employees S.F.209 (Chmielcwski) (Govern- mental Operations) wonId define em- ployees of the Minnesola association of townships as PERA covered public employees. CB Military service S.F.250 (Bertram, Diessner, Vick- emlan, Beckman, Clunielewski) (Gov- ernmental Opcrations) would granlup to two years service crcdit for rctiremcnt pnrposes to Vietnam era vcterans for active military duty, if they served at least 180 days, CB Minneapolis police and firelighter retirement S.F.305 (Pogemiller, Kroening, Spear, Brandl, D. Peterson) (Govcrn- mental Opcrations) wonld allow a first chss city with a population over 300,000 to allot a portion of police state aid to apply toward the employcr contribution to the police and fire relief association based on police officers and firefighters covered salaries for eaeh payroll period. The bill would limit the allowable ad- ministrative expeuses by excluding amounts paid for outsidc investment advice on the relief association special fund, The bill would modify actnarial assumptions, provide statutory interest C~ assumptions, and salary increase assump- tion. The bill would transfer the remain- ing assets after all benefits are paid to the city, and would authorize annual post- retirement payments, based on excess investment income. CB Retirement age to 62 S,F. 307 (D. Mae, Morse, Po- gemilier, Renneke) (Governmental Operations) would lower the normal age of retirement to 62. The bill would adjust the annuity formula to offset the reductions in years of service, applying the 1.5 percent factor for all years of service for various systems and coordi- nating members. The bill would phase in changes in benefits and contributions. CB AnokalChamplin volunteer firefighters S.F.310 (Merriam) (Govenmlen- tal Operations) would exclude AnokaJ Champlin volunteer fIrefighters from the definition of public employee for retire- ment coverage, The bill would exempt vohmteer firefighters from future con- tributions to PERA and would allow a refnnd for past contributions. AnokaJ Champlin would be the fourth such or- ganization to exclude their volunteer firefighters from the definition of public employee. CB Personnel Supplemental \nrkers, compensation benefits H.F.!31 (Sviggum, Bertram, Heap) (Labor-Management Relations) would eliminate slipplementary workers, com- pensation benefits for new claims after October I, 1989. CB S4 Unemployment compensation benefit H.F.152 (Uphus, Rukavina, Jen- nings, Begich. Dille) (Labor-Manage- ment Relations) would increase the amount that a person could eam before unemployment compensation benefits would decrease. The new amount would be $50 per week (now $25) or 25 percent of earnings, whichever is greater. CB OSHA, treble damages, hazardous su bstance H.F.300 (Clark, Greenfield) (La- bor-Management Relations) would pro- vide remedies where an administrative law jndge finds an employer discharged or discriminated against an employee because the person exercised occupa- tional safety and health rights. The bill would remove language excluding cer- tain medical research substances from the definition of hazardous substances. CB Public safety dispatchers H.F.301 (Wenzel) (Governmen- tal Operations) would include public safety dispatchers as essential employees. CB Overtime at 40 hours S.F.287 (Chmielewski) (Employ- ment) would provide that work over 40 hours a week would be overtime. The bill would disallow an employer from charging a fee to employment appli- cants. CB Public employee contracts S.F.317 (R. Petcrson) (Govemmen- tal Operations) would specify that em- ployee labor relations contracts and new contract provisions would not apply retro- actively to any date prior to the date the parties sign a new contract. CB Special Legislation 0 Historical society levy H.F.I 28 (Doug Carlson) (Local Government & Metropolitan Affairs) would delay the effective date of the historical society levies for Chisago, Kanabec, Pine, and Carlton counties until January I, 1990 (currently January I, 1989). SH Beltrami County animal control H.F.134 (R. Johnson, Tunheim) (Local Govemment & Metropolitan Affairs) would provide a system of ani- mal control for the county without a system of licensing. Effective after county board approval. SH Sauk Centre library levy S.F.309 (Dean Johnson, Bertram) (Local and Urban Govenunent) would authorize the city of Sauk Centre to levy a property tax to fund capital improve- ments to the city library. The bill would limit the total levy to $50,000 a year and impose a reverse referendum require- ment. CB 'I ! i I o LMC Cities Bulletin . o o . Federal Update Bonding authority under discussion Bill would set new municipal bond restrictions On January 3. Representative Brian Donnelly (D-Mass.) introduced H.R. 151 further restricting cities' use of tax-ex- empt bonds. The proposal would affect bonds that cities issue after January 3. The new proposal wonld add new income-limits on rents in rental housing ifmunicipal revenue bonds help finance either construction or purchase of rental housing for rehabilitation. H,R. 151 would also extend private activity multi-family income limits to traditional municipal bonds local units issue to buy, build, or rehabilitate multi- family rental housing. It would extend those income limits to the financing of continuing care facilities containing rental housing financed by 501(c) (3) bonds. The only exceptions would be compli- ance with court-ordered desegregation or where the city has primarily seeured the bonds. The bill docsn't define the terms of this requirement which makes it unclear at what level revenue from rents would cause the bonds to become taxable. More restrictive income limits increase the gap between local costs of housing con- struction' and family income in some areas of the nation. This results in fail- nre of the bond financing programs to adequately finance needed construction or rehabilitation costs. As in previous 1988 legislation, the new proposal would also place retroac- tive curbs on cities' authority to issue tax-exempt muuicipal bonds. The Na- tional League of Cities has urged the House Ways and Means Committee Chairnlan Dan Rostenkowski (D-Ill.) to take action to haltthe use of retroactivity in legislation affecting traditional uses of municipal bonding. Proposed mandatory disclosure would increase bond costs At the same time as the Donnelly legislation would restrict tax-exempt bonds, the Sccuritics and Exchange Commission has proposed rules that would rcquire cities to provide official disclo- sure statements to a central repository and require more extcnsivc information in diselosure statements. resulting in more costs at the local level. At present. the proposed rulc would excmpt bond issues of less than $10 million. Conullcnts thc SEC has re- ccived have indicated support from the securities industry for broadening thc coverage of the rule to all mnnicipal bond issucs of more than $1 million. Up to this time, municipal bond issucs havc been exempt from fedcrally maudated registration and disclosure requirements. NLC has expressed concern over the impact of the proposed regulation on flexibility to issuc municipal bonds at the local level, interfercuce with currcnt lllunicipaI practices to infollll investors abont municipal bond issucs. and the additioual costs that would result for cities and local taxpayers. The proposcd rules would reduce tradition city author, ity to issue municipal bouds to provide public facilities and services through bonding programs. All Febrn~rv 3, 1989 Fl League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Avenue East Sl. PaId, MN 55101-2526 Phone: 612-227-5600 FAX: 612-221-0986 TIle League of Minnesota Cities publishes the Legislative Bulletin weekly during Ole Legislative session. Subscriptions: mcmbers- $20; non.mernbers,$35. Contact: Rose Minke, League of Minnesota Cities. Donald Slaler Executive Director Deb Nyberg Assistant Edilor Jean Mehle Goad Ediloc League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Staff Joel Jamnik Environmcnt, pcrsonncl, public safety, gcncral govcrn, mcnt Laurie Hacking LGA, taxcs, financc Stanley Peskar Pcnsions, personnel, public safcty Donald Slater Dcvelopmcnt tools Ann Higgins Fedcra] Icgislation, elections, ethics Sarah Hackett Legislative analyst Rarry Uyan Tax policy analyst Chuck Uichler Legislative assistant Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislath'e Staff Vern Peterson Executive Director Uoger Peterson Director of Legi~lative Affairs i IRSl CI ASS tI S POS'I A(;I PAID St P.wl. MN 0 PI RMll NO. 122 James E. Schrantz Admr. 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Where to get legislative information at the Capitol* Copies of bills , House Chief Clerk's Office - 296-2314, Rm. 211, Stale Capitol Secretary of Senate's Office - 296-2343, Rm. 231, State Capitol Rill status, authors, companion, committee referral (by bill number, author, or 'topic) House Index, 296-6646, Rm. 211, State Capitol Senaie Index - 296-2887, Rm. 231 Statc Capitol Weekly committee schedules, bill introductions, and summaries of committee and "oor action House Infonnation Office - 296-2146, 175 State Office Building Senate Illfonnalion Office - 296-0504, Rm. 231, State Capitol Uecording of the tilllowing day's commillee sl'hedllle and agenda, (after 4:30 p.m.) "House Call" (House committee schedule) - 296-9283 Senate Hotline (Senale committee schedule) - 29608088 To reach a member on the House or Senate floor House Sergeant at AmlS - 296-4860 Senate Page Desk - 296-4159 To notify the governor's office of your concerns Govemor Rudy Pcrpich - 296)391, Rrn. I30, State.Capitol *AII addresses are St. Paul, MN 55J55, an area codes 612 '\ o . o COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Bunker Hills Activities Center 550 NW Bunker Lake Blvd. Anoka, Minnesota 55304 -.-......... . I' ;}\ t";" [, \: 'f::-l"; ig ~;' (' ~V\ ~ .... ,I" . .. "Ii .,' . I " I .- b "j" :=': c, b. ::l 1,1 t1:'r~"f~~"";"'~~~;~'-l! J January 31, 1989 " .................._~"_..,.-:m___~____,..., o Paul Ruud Jerri Olson I<en I rvi n ,,; Jim Scht'ar.tz Dot' i s N i val a Mat'y He.yt Te.m Klasser. Bill ottensmarm Gat'y Steer, Hat'o 1 d Sheff Ed Matthiesen Me 1 S i r,n CITY OF ANDOVER c.c. 2/7/8' I -' Anoka Co. Highway Department Rnoka Co. Highway Department City .=.f Blaine City Manager, Rndover City Rdministrator, Ham Lake Town Manager, Columbus Township Columbus Township City Engineer, Coon Rapids City of Ham Lake Rttorney, Coon Creek Watershed District Engineer, Coon Creek Watershed District Board of Water & Soil Resources Enclosed are notes from the December 27, 1988 and January 12, 1989 meetings held to discuss proposed Capital Improvement projects and the financing of those projects. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call 434-5929. ~ A. M. Sar,net'ud District Rdministrator 14MS : rh cc: CCWD Board Members MAIL ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: Coon Creek Watershed District, c/o District Administrator A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A., 1207 Constance Blvd. N.E., Ham Lake, MN 55304 COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Notes ft~()m December 27, 1388 inforMatio~al nleeting Ol'K'ka C,;,unty Highway Building, ILfitO BI.mke;' Lake Blvd.. 10:00 a.m. RE: Review of amendments for Ditch 60, Happy Acres pond and the pond at Old Colony Estates Pt-'eserli: : Paul Ruud IRnoka County Highway Dept.), Ken Irvin lBlaine), Jim Schrantz (Andover), Jon Olson (Anoka County Highway Dept.), Mel Sinn (BWSR), Ken Slyzuk, Ed MatthIesen, Al SanY".et'l.ld Ditch 60 - The District Engineer informed the group that the improvement/repair of Ditch 60 had been cancelled. The Board of Managers felt an immediate repair or improvement wasn't needed. Ken Irvin, City of Blaine, agreed a project on Ditch 60 should be deferred. Ditch 60 will be monitored and an improvement/repair will be scheduled when the need arises. The District Engineer was asked to review the Blaine Comprehensive Plan to determine whether the wetland in the northeast quadrant behind the Blaine High School can provide adequate storage during a 5-year, la-year, 25-year or laO-year storm. Financing of the regional ponding program was discussed. Inequities are resulting when developers donate some sites while other sites will have to be purchased. It appears that the site for the Olympic Glen pond will have to be purchased. The Distric~ Rdministrator informed the group that the matter would be taken under advisement and discussed with the Board of Managers and Watershed District staff. Rdded note: The inequity in financing of the regional ponding program was reviewed with staff and Chairman Schulte. It was decided an informational meeting be held with the five municipalities as soon as possible to determine an equitable distribution of costs which can be endorsed by all of the municipalities before the public hearing on the amendments is held. Preliminary information for this meeting is being prepared by staff. No meeting date has been scheduled. o ~CON C~EEK ~ATERSHE~ DI5TRICT QI:1Ct--2S j':Y"QfI1 .ja'nuat...y 12. 1'=8(;: fllee1;ing !i"lo:d(c":!. C..:)u'{',ty Highway 3ui:;'dl'n~l, 144-0 8..tnkE..,.... Ld;~.E' Ei~'./d., i,.,):OO 1::"(_i'f1. i~E : Discussion ,~~ equitable funding f~r pr'ojects i~ tt18 Cdpital Improvement PrograM~ specifically regioYlal ponds P"r"'esent : Gary Steen CHam Lake), Bill Ottensmann CCoon Raoids), Jon Olson (Anoka County Highway Dept.), Ken Irvin (Blaine), Doris Nivala (Ham Lake), Mary Hoyt (Columbus Township), Tom Klassen (Columbus Township), Harold Sheff (CCWD), Ed Matthiesen (CCWD), Al Sannerud (CCWD), Marilyn Nysetvold (CCWD) Acquisition of Sites - Reaional Ponds Al Sannerud, District Administrator, stated the current thinking of the Coon Creek staff is that all pond sites in the regional ponding program should be acquired by the District. The question of compensation for city land donated for a regional ponding site was raised. After discussion, it was the general consensus that if the city had acquired the land at no cost and was donating the site to the Watershed District, the city should not be compensated. If the city incurred cost in acquiring the site, the city should be reimbursed for those costs. Pond Construction Construction of the regional ponds will be the responsibility of the Watershed District. If a developer is involved, the District may negotiate for materials which would then offset acquisition costs. Fundina of Projects Funding of projects under Minnesota Statutes chapter 473 and chapter 10GA was clarified. Under chapter 473, the cost is spread over the entit'e district c.t' a specific ditch system by arl ad valot'em tax. Public lands would be exempt from the tax. Funding under chapter 10GA is by special assessment. Public lands are included and the special assessment affects all property owners in the designated area. Proposed funding of the regional ponding program is a district-wide ad valorem tax under chapter 473. Harold Sheff addressed the proposed project on Ditch 44 which affects Columbus Township. It is possible to finance a project with a combination ad valorem tax and special assessment. R special assessment would be placed on all property within the drainage Osystem. B.:;.th pt'ocedl,lt'es undet' 473 arid lOGA w.:;.uld have te. be fo:ollowed n their entirety. The District needs to research the cost associated with a special assessment and the feasibility of financing the project with a combination ad valorem tax/special assessment. . .,j i:..;)'l. 12, i ':;:89 file6?t i i"-lg :~~')G!~a Cj~un~v :~iotlWa\1 3ljildi/lO Q=-ge 2 ..... ,.. Pt.lbl ic Relat: il:lns/R~~l..9..~nt Not i 'ficat. ion fiiailiY'lfj ';If indi'./idl~lal notices .is nQt '('8qt'ir-.ed l.t......det... chaptr:t... .y./~. Waterstled staff was asked to evaluate the cost of sending individual notices prior to the public hearing. Legally, the District is only ~"'equired to print a legal notice in th~ paper. The District was encouraged to do more than legally required. Placing an ad in local papers was suggested. Individual property owners adjacent to the project would receive a notice as part of the acquisition process. (Notification would be made when the amendment becomes a project.) It was recommended the District increase publicity so the residents involved would understand the process and how their properties benefit from the regional ponding program or a cleaned ditch system even if the property is not adjacent to a pond or ditch. R new information brochure is being developed. F,:.llow Up The Board of Managers will develop a policy statement regarding acquisition and financing of the regional ponding program. The statement will be distributed to each of ,the cities. It was mentioned that the cities had signed a Joint Powers Agreement to fund lobbying of legislation which affects the cities in Anoka County. It was suggested the Watershed District look into joining the cities in those lobbying efforts. The cities should contact Ed Matthiesen concerning city land available fe.t' pe.nding. It is p.:.ssible sor.]e .:.f that larld ce."tld fit int.:. the regional ponding program. o o o 10 I C.C, 2!?/F1 Blaine Community SChOlarShiP Association if") t (~ E ij ',I E :'0,. ~1r;;-;~;lU ~"","'_""""r".__'_ . .,.,..... CITY OF ANDOVER J~nuary 26, 1989 Dear Community Leader, Thm Blaine Community Scholarship Association ISCSAI is launching its 1989 Community Fund Drive. Our goal for the school year of' 1988/89 is to obtain funding sufficient to provide 50 deserving graduates of Blaine High School with scholarships of $500.00 or mere. These scholarships are to be used for eduacational needs at colleges, co~nunity colleges, universities, trade and/or technical schools. The scholarship fund is establised thrDugh the efforts of the BCSA members. We spcmser several fund raisers during the year, but a large portion of our funds come from you, the businesses and individuals who respond te our Co~nunity Fund Iki ve. SCSA invites you .s a com~Jnity leader to honor and recognize outstanding Blaine graduates for the achievements and contributions they have made to their school and community. You may become a Sustaining Member with a contribution of $500.00 or more for a scholarship presented in your name, or you may become a Contributing Merr~er with a contribution under $500.00. We invite sustaining members to send a representative on recipient night to present their SChCll ar'shi p. - Please take time today to fill out and return the enclosed Pledge Card. If you have any questions regarding the scholarship program, return the card with your questions and lor comments. We would appreciate having a response from you today to enable us to make this a 'successful scholarship year. Pledges or' checks prior to April 17, 1989, will be published in our Recipient Night program for recogniton. Recipient Recognition night will be May 8, 1989 in the auditorium of Blaine High School. &:;i~ ~~.~ Cleo Smithwick and Linda Syverson Cr.lfnmunity Fund DriVE! Chairpersons "DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS" P.O. BOX 34264 BLAINE, MN 55434 .. o o DONOR FORM RETURN TO: BLAINE COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION Cleo Smithwick, Chairperson P.O. Box 34264 Blaine, MN 55434 DONOR ------------------------------------------------------ ADDRE88_____________________________________________________ CITY__________________________STATE______________ZIP__------ TELEPHONE NUMBER.____.___________________ SUSTAINING MEMBERSHIP ($500.00 or MOREl Ot h F..1r AmclLH1 t _ .____ ..__.._,.. _ __.__.._ _. ____.__._ 0_' .--------. Contact directly for more information_______________________ ----------------.-------- ,~ " ) ,~ - (Z5' MEMO TO: COUNTY OF ~ Office of the Coullty Board of Commissiollers ~ COURTHOUSE ANOKA,MINNESOTA55303 612-421-4760 1(~ 111/ EMfI"'WJ,/~ ~ ,~ January 31,1989 FiitL i!i,reJ~8V # fj/' "', f;~'i'/:~' it'... ,,' . ". -. ". " ).. roO, ..,. .. ..1 p ,; ,',' ,",' ',' ~.' "", ij t~r' '".,,-.~.,::""', lJ \.fw . .. . . .J ~ U:' 8 ...;.~.~.:-~. 07)' James Schrantz, City Administrator, City of Andov r ';'.._..., _ "1.)9 ,V William Ottensmann, City Engineer, City of Coon api~/T .....---.0...,..... Judi Peterson, Town Clerk, Oak Grove Township Y OF ANDOVER David Hartley, City Administrator, City of Ramsey c:c~ 2/7/!il ANOKA FROM: Norm Schiferl, Special Assistant to the County Administrator SUBJECT: Technical Reports for the Anoka County Landfill Inventory EIS Enclosed for your information are two documents related to the hydrogeologic work element of the Anoka County Landfill Inventory EIS (Environmental Impact Statement): a) Phase IA Technical Memorandum; and b) Phase IB/II Contract Documents (for well drillers). Backqround, The Scoping Document for the EIS provides for the hydrogeologic work element to be performed in two phases. The concept was to conduct the first phase of drilling work and analysis, and then to identify additional information needed in a second phase of work to complete the hydrogeologic analysis. In the development of drilling specifications for the first phase of work in 1987, concerns surfaced regarding potential superfund liability for drilling wells , and soil borings into deeper aquifers at sites adjacent to existing landfills: Site D in Oak Grove Township, adjacent to the Oak Grove Landfill; and Site P in the City of Ramsey, adjacenUo the Anoka Landfill. As a result, only shallow soil borings and wells were drilled at Sites D and p, while both shallow and deeper borings and wells were drilled at Site Q in the Cities of Andover and Coon Rapids, as initially proposed, (This first drilling program is entitled Phase 1A.) To address the concern about liability for deeper well drilling, Anoka County sought legislation in 1988; legislation was passed under which metropolitan landfill contingency funds may be used to pay the cost of response actions related to the County's EIS drilling work, provided that the work is done under the supervision of the MPCA. o The attached Phase IA Technical Memorandum was prepared by the County's engineering consultant, Donohue and Associates, and submitted to the MPCA for review. This document discusses the results from phase IA drilling and related analysis, plus information from the RifFS (Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study) investigations at adjacent or nearby existing disposal sites. It then proposes a second phase of hydrogeologic work, (Phase IB refers to borings and wells that were deferred from the initial phase of work.) MPCA technical staff have consented to most of the items in the proposed Phase IB/Phase II work plan, while requesting several relCl;!ively minor modifications. These modifications have been reflected in the specifications in the attached contract documents for well drillers. Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer '.!'~i1"1 J o o ,. JanuaIy 31, 1009 Page 2 The contract documents and the Phase IA Technical Memorandum have been sent simultaneously for final review to several parties, including the MPCA, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Health, and the landfill inventory site host communities. We are requesting that all of these parties contact us as soon as possible if there are any questions or comments. My telephone number is 421-4760, extension 1173. The County will need to amend its grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council for the EIS .' and its contract with Donohue before the second phase of drilling can proceed. NS:nb Enclosures cc: Mayor James E. Elling Mayor Bob Lewis Chairperson Nancy Collins Mayor Gary i~eimann Anoka County Commissioners Jay Mclinden Tim Yantos Marcia Bennett Colleen Herrmann Bob Hutchison Keith Anderson, Donohue & Associates - /if'~ ~I Norm Schiferl o CITY of ANDOVER MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council COPIES TO: Citv Clerk and Admini"rr"ror FROM: Building n"'p"rrmpnr DATE: Fphrl1~ry? lqRq REFERENCE: JANUARY l,)B,) Month] y Rni 1 ni ng npp"r1-mpn1- Rppor1- I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for the Month of January 1989: BUILDING PERMITS 17 Residences 1 Garage 1 Remodeling 3 Chimney/Stove/Fireplace 1 Structural Change 23 APPROXIMATE VALUATION $ 1,777,000.00 2,000.00 18,000.00 4,905.00 2,500.00 $ 1,804,405.00 PERMITS 23 Building Permits 1 Demolition . 3 Sign Permits 19 Heating Permits 2 Heating Repair 14 Hook Up (Sewer) 15 Plumbing Permits 2 Plumbing Repair 77 Pumping Permits 1 Septic Permit; 7 Well Permits 1 Well Repair 13 Water Meter Permits 17 Certificate of Occupancy 98 Contractor's License FEES $ COLLECTED 8,541.25 15.00 32.00 385.00 40.00 350.00 1,031.07 41. 00 192.50 25.00 105.00 15.00 650.00 68.00 2,450.00 $13,940.82 $13,940.82 $1,804,405.00 Total Building Department Income--January 1989 Total Valuation--January 1989 Total Number of Houses YTD (1989) - 17 Total Number of Houses YTD (1988) - 12 Total Number of Houses 1988 - 356 Total Number of Houses 1987 - 381 / '--/ Official o DA/jp ~ , o CITY OF ANDOVER 1988 BUILDING DEPARTMENT REPORT o ." 0 NUMBER OF BUILDING PERMITS TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 1986 Residential Dwelling 356 381 289 Additions 19 13 30 Garages 54 42 27 Remodeling/Commercial Finishing 10 34 1 Commercial Buildings 6 11 Pole Buildings/Sheds 19 27 21 Barns 1 1 2 Swimming Pools 20 20 8 Chimneys/Stoves/Fireplaces 18 13 16 Structural Changes 6 14 5 Porches/Decks 84 53 29 Repair Fire Damage 3 2 3 TOTAL 596 611 431 o o o VALUATION OF BUILDING PERMITS TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 1986 Residential Dwellings $35,462,000.00 34,557,202.00 24,971,270.00 Additions 277,800.00 221,500.00 -356,810.00 Garages 351,641.00 246,435.00 170,786.00 Remodeling/Commercial Finish 86,700.00 626,885.25 1,292.00 Commercial Buildings 880,422.00 9,735,518,50 Pole Buildings/Sheds 63,500.00 143,969.00 66,315.00 Barns 12,000.00 6,000.00 4,400.00 Swimming Pools 121,000,00 120,590.00 74,250.00 Chimneys/Stoves/Fireplaces 44,082.00 24,686,00 18,045.00 Structural Changes 11,600.00 114,616.00 18,000.00 Porches/Decks 362,958.00 166,715.00 135,105.85 Repair Fire Damaqe 27,500.00 11,835.00 50,800.00 To'tal $37,701,203.00 $45,975,951.75 $25,867,073.85 0 BUILDING PERMIT FEES TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 1986 Residential Dwellings $158,730.00 $160,604.50 $117,388.00 Additions 2,191. 33 1,192.20 2,762.53 Garages 3,245.00 2,298.20 1,578.30 Remodeling/Commercial Finishing 1,134.84 5,439.87 20.50 Commercial Building 4,289.20 43,342,90 Pole Buildings/Sheds 716.80 1,375.30 797.23 Barns 92.50 56.50 62.00 Swimming Pools 1,169.90 1,111.10 609.80 Chimneys/stoves/Fireplaces 603.30 361. 60 296.10 Structural Changes 147.30 1,088.68 230.13 Porches/Decks 3,658.50 1,799.60 1,316.80 Repair Fire Damage 226.50 112.40 348.00 Total $176,205.17 $218,782.85 $125,409.39 o o o STATE SURCHARGE COLLECTED TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 Residential Dwellings $17,723.00 $17,334.50 Additions 138.90 110.80 Garages 175.70 124.05 Remodeling/Commercial Finishing 43.60 313.64 Commercial Buildings 440.50 4,020.32 Pole Buildings/Sheds 32.05 75.75 Barns 6.00 3.00 Swimming Pools 75.60 60.70 Chimneys/Stoves/Fireplaces 22.30 13.00 Structural Changes 6.75 58.85 Porches/Decks 192.90 84.55 Fire Damage 13.75 5.95 1986 $12,308.50 179.15 85.40 .60 34.05 2.20 37.15 12.25 9.60 68.60 25.50 Total $12,763.00 $18,871.05 $22,205.11 0 NUMBER OF PERMITS OTHER THAN BUILDING TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 1986 Heating Permits 371 391 282 Heating Repair Permits 56 39 8 Hook Up Permits 269 253 145 Plumbing Permits 371 407 288 Plumbing Repair Permits 15 10 Pumping Permits 297 297 334 Septic Permits 110 158 136 Septic Repair Permits 29 37 37 Water Meter Permits 252 234 137 Well Permits 123 168 149 Well Repair Permits 30 18 12 Total 1923 2012 1528 o '- 0 FEES FOR PERMITS OTHER THAN BUILDING TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 1986 Heating Permits $12,065.75 $11,688.22 $ 4,975.00 Heating Repair Permits 770..00 555.00 120.00 Hook Up Permits 6,725.00 6,325.00 3,625.00 Plumbing Permits 21,847.71 34,032.76 14,946.00 Plumbing Repair Permits 237.00 129.00 Pumping Permits 742.50 742.50 835.00 Septic Permits 2,800.00 3,950.00 3,400.00 septic Repair Permits 725.00 925.00 925.00 Water Meter Permits 12,600.00 11,700.00 6,395,00 Well Permits 1,875.00 2,550.00 2,280.00 Well Repair Permits 450.00 270.00 180.00 o To'ta1 $60,837.96 $72,867.48 $37,681.00 0 SURCHARGE ON PERMITS OTHER THAN BUILDING TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 1986 Heating Permits $185.50 $328.50 $141.00 Heating Repair Permits 28.00 19.50 4.00 Hook Up Permits 134.50 126.50 72.50 Plumbing Permits 185.50 403.08 144.00 Plumbing Repair Permits 7.50 5.00 Septic Permits 55.00 79.00 68.00 septic Repair 'Permits 14.50 18.50 18.50 Water Meter Permits 126.00 117,00 72,50 Total $736.50 $1,097.08 $520.50 o 0 NUMBER OF OTHER FEES COLLECTED TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 1986 Administrative Fees (Sewer) 270 253 145 Agri Building Permits 4 6 Certificates of Occupancy 367 397 289 Curb Cut Permits 2 6 6 Demolition Permit 1 Footing Permits 3 8 10 Renewal Permits 1 Sewer Availablility Charges 287 355 180 Sign Permits 29 34 26 VA Reports 4 Moving Permits 2 4 Total 964 1057 668 o 0 OTHER FEES COLLECTED TYPE OF PERMIT 1988 1987 1986 Administrative Fees (Sewer) $4,050.00 $3,795.00 $2,175.00 Agri Building Permits 20.00 30.00 Certificates of Occupancy 1,468.00 1,588.00 1,156.00 Curb Cut Permits 10.00 30.00 30.00 Demolition Permit 30.00 30.00 Footing Permits 30.00 80.00 100.00 Renewal Permits 5.00 Sewer Availability Charges 157,850.00 186,375.00 85,500.00 Sign Permits 507.30 2,074.67 743.00 VA Reports 60.00 Moving Permits 125,00 250.00 Total $164,060.30 194,192.67 89,829.00 o 0 NUMBER OF CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES TYPE OF LICENSE 1988 1987 1986 Blacktopping 10 7 5 Masonry 57 52 37 Excavating 41 34 27 General Construction 158 133 133 Heating & Air Conditioning 55 41 42 Insulation 5 5 6 stucco 2 2 1 Plumbing 75 59 60 Pumping 10 12 10 Roads 1 sanitary Sewer Installation 17 19 13 Septic System 35 31 36 Swimming Pools 5 2 3 Well Drilling 15 17 14 Demolition 1 Fire Protection 2 Signs 3 4 1 Total 490 418 390 c o FEES COLLECTED FOR CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES TYPE OF LICENSE 1988 1987 1986 Blacktopping $ 250.00 $ 175.00 $ 125.00 Masonry 1,425.00 1,300.00 925.00 Excavating 1,025.00 850.00 675.00 General Construction 3,950.00 3,325.00 3,325.00 Heating & Air Conditioning 1,375.00 1,025.00 1,050.00 Insulation 125.00 125.00 150.00 Stucco 50.00 50.00 25.00 plumbing No Fee No Fee No Fee Pumping 250.00 300.00 250.00 Roads 25.00 Sanitary Sewer Installation No Fee No Fee No Fee Septic Systems 875.00 775.00 900.00 Swimming Pools 125.00 50.00 75.00 Ylell Drilling No Fee No Fee No Fee Demolition 25.00 Fire Protection 50.00 Signs 75.00 100.00 25.00 Total $9,575.00 $8,075.00 $7,575.00 o 0 GENERAL SUMMARY Total Number of Permits 1988 2,519 Total Number of Permits 1987 2,623 Total Number of Permits 1986 1,959 Total Fees for Permits 1988 237,043.13 Total Fees for Permits 1987 291,650.33 Total Fees for Permits 1986 163,090.39 Value of Building Permits 1988 37,701,203.00 value of Building Permits 1987 45,975,951. 75 Value of Building Permits 1986 $ 25,867,073.85 Total Contractor License Fees 1988 9,575.00 Total Contractor License Fees 1987 8,075.00 Total Contractor License Fees 1986 7,575.00 Total Contractor Licenses Issued 1988 490 Total Contractor Licenses Issued 1987 418 Total Contractor Licenses Issued 1986 390 Total Number of other Fees Collected 1988 964 Total Number of Other Fees Collected 1987 1,057 Total Number of Other Fees Collected 1986 668 Total of Other Fees Collected 1988 164,060.30 Total of Other Fees Collected 1987 194,192.67 Total of Other Fees Collected 1986 89,829.00 0 LAW 0FF1CES OF 70 c.C, ~'l" &>'7 11'1/ Fa o Burke and .fIawkins SUITE 101 2l1li COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTAI5~33 PHONE: 1111217_211118 JOHN M. BURKE: W1WAM G. HAWKINS IIARIIY M.IIOIIINSOH R[:fs~~~n . CITY OF ANDOVER / February 1, 1989 Mr. John Rodeberg Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Associates 2500 American National Bank Bldg. St. Paul, MN 55101 Mr. James E. Schrantz Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 \ , Mr. Curtis Larson 6240 Highway 65 N.E. Suite 207 Fr idley, MN 55432 Dear John, Jim and Curt: This letter is to advise you that I have received notice of a jury trial set for July 10, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. at the Anoka Coun ty Cour thouse in Anoka concerning the appeal of Kenneth and Mary Ann Slyzuk of the eminent domain award entered as a result of the City's action to acquire right-of-way. It will be necessary for you to be present at this trial. Please mark your calendar at this time. Our office will be in touch with you prior to that date to discuss your testimony. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. , WGH:mk o Governor :releases budget Tax reform is a key con~erJ;l ... o ~j Number 3 "I,' Focusing on four themes: education, research, environmental protection, and tax reform, Governor Perpich released last Wednesday his budget blue- print for spending $13,3 billion over the 1990-91 bienniwn. The governor's financial conimitment to property tax reform was extremely disappointing for cities. For the next two years, the governor pledged: , . * ,$73 million in increased state funding for K- 12 educati{)n; .', * $139 million funding increase for research and higher education; , * $88 million increase for environmental pro- tection funds, "--- * $100 million in additional spending for prop- erty tax relief; " * $55 million in new spending for children; * $70 million fot "Year of the City" programs (for Duluth, Minneapolis, and St. Paul); * $39 million in increased state fund to promote affordable housing; , ,.' * $123 million for health and hwnan resources spending; * $124 million in capital investment for infra- structure improvements; and * $43 million for state agency computerization and improving efficiency. Property tax reform: Only $100 million pledge Stating that Minnesota's property tax/local aids system "needs a major overhaul," Perpich recom- mended only an additional $100 million over the (See Governor, page 3) 'f-'''''; : ~', "....f.: , , "', ....~, : }, +' Governor Rudy Perpich outlines his biennial budge/ aT a press conference Wedn.esday, January,25.M. GOl'er,!,lQrNarlene Johnson looks on, Photo by Debra Nyberg";,,. ' o Action Alert \...../ There are no action alerts this week. \ Contents Page Articles Governor releases budget: Tax reform is a key concern ....................................................1 (' ,}"..',..,.,~>i." , ",.,... ,Reagan 1990 'budget would cut city funds ...........FI (inside back cover) , , ,'<"" c.' . .. . ''Year of thlCity" programs to receive $70 million \.. ~...~.~:.~.~. ...... ..... .:~~.;~~~... ....... ............... ..... 4 Budget addresses affordable housing.....................4 . '.' ..~ Perpich proposal would increase transportation fund.ing ..........:~......~.........................5 Governor calls for environmental funding ..~~........5 . ""i:..o.': " . Governor's budget spending percentages ..............6 "- . ':,,'.,-.,;;>...:,'.' The.I.egislafute,should restore, the MinnesotaIDfraCle by Gov. Rudy Perpich ...........7 C,''''' ':," ~'i,- '. ',..' Legislative injury compensation study commission Pegins hearings .................................8 (f\ :.,':-<:,;t,_:::.-\,~_'.i,~\:' " State needs ~itY officials to serve on noxious weed 'comniittee ........~..............................8 ~,,; '. -,.' ';':'.!:'l' " ..... ":-.~ Federal UPdate ',.,(:'. ~"').--'.'..' Bill Summaries .............;~...~................~..........................S 1 (yellow sheets) " The Cities Bulletin is a' 0 publication of the League of Minnesota Cities and includes an update of state legislative, administrative, and congressional actions that affect cities. It also includes reviews of metropolitan area issues by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. League legislative staff members are available to answer your questioris concerning legislation relating to cities. The Bulletin lists League and AMM authors of articles and bill summaries by their initials. Joel Jamnik -- JJ Laurie Fiori Hacking -- LFH Stanley Peskar -- SP Ann Higgins -- AH Donald Slater -- DS Sarah Hackett -- SH Chuck Bichler -- CB Thomas Grundhoefer -- TG Debra Nyberg -- DN Jean Mehle Goad -- JMG Vern Peterson -- VP Roger Peterson -- RP ~ '0 page 2 LMC Cities Bulletin . ~ o v Governor, continued next two years to finance a property tax refonn package. This increase for prop- erty tax refonn is extremely small given that our current structure of property tax aids and credits will cost approximately $2.7 bilIion (excluding school aids) over the biennium. Furthennore, part of the $100 million may include $22 milIion in funds to be transferred from the motor vehicle excise tax (MVET) proceeds. An additional $100 million for the biennium represents only a 3.7 percent increase over current (FY 1990) spend- ing levels. Such a funding increase is below the projected inflation rate and wilI do little to offset the large school levy increases expected next year. League property tax policy recom- mendations call for total state funding for property tax relief to increase at least with the rate of inflation so that such funding keeps pace with the iucreasing costs oflocal govennnent services. Failure to provide snfficient funds for property tax relief programs means that nct tax burdens for property taxpayers are likely to rise. The governor's recommendations contain similar concerns for school aid financing. The bndget plan holds the general education fonnula allowance at $2,800 per stndent for 1990 and contains no funding increase in the fonnula for 1991. The projected result in local school levy increases is approximately $500 million for the biennium. Governor Perpich stated he might be willing to consider an increase in the state's contribution to the general edu- cation fonnula if future revenue fore- casts show increased state revenues beyond those projected. Without in- creased state assistance, nct tax burdcns for property taxpayers wilI rise rapidly. The Perpich budget document rec- ognizes that thc final cost of refonn may actually exceed $100 milIioh, But the governor made no specific recommen- dations for refonn, instructing his staff to work with legislative leaders to fash- ion a refonn plan. ,:"""- ~ t o ~ Business, rental, home tax relief The governor was specific on his goals for property tax changes, He stressed January 27,1989 that reductions in tax burdens are needed for business property, rental housing, and middle-value homes between $68,000 and $100,000 in market value. Governor Perpich asserted that the share of net property taxes paid by busi- nesses has risen from 26 percent in 1977 to 36 percent in 1989, an increase that he said "impairs our ability to attract and maintain jobs in Minnesota." Similarly, the governor stated that property taxes for rental housing are "severe....!n many cases, people who cannot afford to buy a home pay much higher property taxes (throngh their rents) than do those who can afford to buy." Toward the goal of clarifying the state's responsibilities, the govcrnorrec- ommended that "as much as possible of undesignated local aids (primarily tran- sition aid) attributable to schools be added to the state's share of the gencral cduca- tion fonnula" in order to increase the state's share of education fnnding aud reduce the local property tax share. Because of the lack of detail in the budget document, it is unclear whether the portion of transition aid (fonnerly homestead credit program) which is goes , to cities would decrease in order to pro- vide more state funding for schools. The net effect of such a shift would be to reduce school levies while forcing in- creases in city levies. The budget also calls for the state to begin assuming the costs of the state's ,district trial court and public defense systems which are presently finauced by the counties, ,Of the $100 million pledged for property tax relief, $13 million would be eannarked to finance court costs. In addition, Commissioner Triplett indicated that the total amount of county LGA funding--$15 milliou annually-- would be rescinded to help cover court takeover costs. Local aid reform Another problem with our property tax structure, according to the governor, is the "complexity and instability of the various fonnulas used to distribute aids to local governments." The budgetdocu- ment states that the primary function of state aid to local governments ought to be to reduce property wealth differences, A refocusing of state aid on this goal, the governor stated, "will lead to a fair and understandable basis for distri- bution of state aid, resulting in the great- est aid to those local governments least . able to pay for basic services." . FIve percent reserve In particular, Perpich commented "The budget also renewed Governor on the $373 million in funding for city . Perpich's reqnest for a budget reserve local government aid (LGA), "This high equal to five percent of expenditures. level of aid creates an unhealthy de- He is making this recommendation to pendency by local governments on state reduce the degree of financial risk the aids and exacerbates unequal treatment" state runs if revenue and spcndiug forc- between cities," he said. casts prove wrong. Under the governor's plan the cur- rent budget reserve of $550 would in- crease to $670 million over the next biennium. To achieve this, surplus funds . would automatically be transferred into the reserve fund until it reaches the five percent level (or $670 million). Property tax' relief During a press conference on the budget, Minnesota Commissioner of Finance Tom Triplett called the state's property tax relief system "horribly:' expensive" and labeled it a "black hole" , for state spendiug, . Sounding a theme that has been Fees for local units prevalent in the past, the budget called The governor's budget expects to for a clarification of state financial re- ,save $204,000 over the next two years sponsibilities for local govemmentserv- , by charging service fees to local govern- ices. "The state should pay more of the ments. Some of the proposals illclnde costs of those programs which it man~.' charging local units for the cost of dis- dates, and local governments should pay , tributing police and fire aids and for the more of the costs of local programs not costs of training local assessors, mandated by the state." (continued on next page) page 3 Charitable gambling tax triples Additional tax revenue of $79 mil- lion would come from an increase in tbe charitable gambling tax, under the budget proposal. The tax would risc to six per- cent of gross proceeds; the tax is now 10 percent of net proceeds which is equiva- lent to two percent of gross proceeds. See related budget articles on hous- ing, Yearofthe City funding, environent, and transportation. LHF " ' :. Year of the City" programs to receive $70 million The budget proposal calls for dollar. Funds would be available for $70 million in special program fund- conunercial and housing development ing for the three cities of the first For all three programs, the three c1ass--Duluth, Minneapolis, and Saint cities must submit expenditure pro- Paul. Originally the three cities had, posals to appropriate state agencies. requested $129 million in new aid. . . The agencies would have review and Citing increases in chronic UII- comment authority. employment, poverty, teen pregnancy, According to the governor's homelessness, drug use, crime, and budget document, a future goal for substandard housing in those cities, the year, of the city program is to the governor called for spending in " "begin worldng with other Minne- three program areas: sota cities to identify additional needs · $40 million of funding for the that warrant special state assistance," urban revitalization action program Some additional assistance would (URAP) for low-income housing, tran- become available to other cities un- sitional housing, and other shelter der the governor's housing recom- needs for the homeless; mendations. · $21.3 million for human serv- Last summer, the League devel- iceprogramsassociatedwithjobskill oped policy on the year of the city development, chemical dependency, plan. League legislative policy for mental illness, crime, language and the 1989 session recommends that cultural differences, and inadequate funding should benefit all cities, not health and child care; and just first class cities, According to · $8.7 million for center city' League policy, any categorical aid school districts to assist them in coping program should utilize the broadest with large numbers of students of , and most inclusive definition of a ~pov.erished, ~nsient, and racial" problem as the criterion for city par- mmonty populations. ticipation, rather than a city's geo- The 1987 Legislature provided graphic location or size. $9 . million in urban revitalization Senate Majority Leader Roger action program (URAP) funding for Moe (DFL-Erskine) last month com- core neighborhoods in Minneapolis mented on the Year of the City pro- and Saint Paul. To qualify for URAP posals, "We have 8oo-plus cities, and funds, a neighborhood must meet by the time we get done I'm confident certain distress criteria, Local units it [the city aid legislation] will in- must match URAP funds dollar-for- c1ude all of them." LFH page 4 '0) Budget addresses affordable housing o The governor's budget identifies the critical housing problems facing the state. They include lack of affordable housing for first-time homebuyers, single heads of household, the homeless, and the elderly. Noting that the most serious impact of the "affordability crisis" is to female-headed households, young fami- lies and the elderly, the governor advo- cates increased state funding for: · neighborhood and community- based housing preservation and reha- bilitation; · assistance for first-time home buyers; · maintenance of the quality and af- fordability of available housing stock; · access to transitional housing for ~ homeless people and families; and · increased efforts to prevent home- . lessness. One of the governor's major recom- mendations in the housing area is $20 million for housing needs for the urban revitalization action program (URAP) activities in the three largest cities, Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth. That sum would make up half of the recommended level of funding for URAP for 1990. It would be for housing preservation and rehabilitation programs and aid to those without access to hous- ing, in keeping with recommendations of the Governor's Commission on Af- fordable Housing in the 1990's, Another major part of the proposed budget for housing needs is $10 million for low-income housing assistance pro- grams in cities other than Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Permanent hous- ing for the homeless, rental assistance for low-income people, and transitional housing programs would receive fund- ing from general fund appropriations. 0 (continued on page 5) LMC Cities Bulletin ~ o ~ ~ o ~. Housing, continued to establish a revolving loan fund for local governments and non-profit or- ganizations. MHFA loans would be for mortgage subsidy and insurance for families seeking to purchase lower-priced homes, The funds would also provide financing for rehabilitation of housing stock. The governor has also recommended changes in state property tax laws to reduce the tax burden on rental residen- tial property. This is another recommen- dation of the commission on affordable housing. The intent would be to reduce disparities in tax rates between homes and residential rental property. AH ;'~.: ,';~. , Perpich :pr(;posaliwould, :~-;;:: J\,'.' increase transportation funding As part of the budget, the governor recommends that the Legislature increase the transfer of the motor vehicle excise tax (MVEl) from its current 30 percent level to 35 percent in 1990, and 45 per- cent in 1991. This would generate an additional $49 million for transportation funding. Governor Perpich proposes to distribute it as follows: * $23 million to the trunk high- way fund * $ 4 million to state rail fund- ing, and * $22 million to local govern- ments to reduce local property taxes for transportation or other local purposes Implicit in the recommendation is the repeal of 1988 legislation that sun- setted or removed funding for local units , of govemment out ofMVET effective in 1991. The $22 million which the gover- nor proposes would go to local units of govemment appears to not require usage on transportation. It is unclear how this money would be distributed and whether cities under 5,000 population would receive a direct portion of the money. The governor also recommends that the Legislature index the gasoline tax to rise automatically thus insuring adequate funding for transportation as costs in- crease. Also proposed is a. restructuring of transportation planning in the Twin City metropolitan area, including sun- setting the RTB (Regional Transit Board). JJ Governor calls for environmental-funding In the enviromncntaI protection area, the governor has recommended $88 million of new state funding, including $24.1 million for groundwater protec- tion efforts and an additional $8.5 mil- lion for increased superfund clean up efforts. Regarding groundwater protection, the governor proposes a comprehensive water resources protection act of 1989. Chief elements of the proposed legisla- tion would be money for groundwater assessments, increased educational ef- forts, improvements in data manage- ment, and improved enforcement of well construction and sealing, The water protection act would identify certain sensitive areas prone to groundwater pollution, and develop and promote best management practices for agriculture, business, and government to avoid groundwater pollution. Part of the additional funding would provide state technical and financial assistance to counties to help develop and imple- ment comprehensive water plans, as well as for sealing certain priority wells to avoid contamination. In the solid waste area, the governor endorsed his select committee on recy- cling and the environment (SCORE) recommendations of a 25 percent recy- cling goal to be achieved by each county in Minnesota by 1993 and a grant and loan program totalling $40 million to encourage and facilitate recycling,litter reduction, market development, and education. The governor's budget includes a request for $27.3 million to go to the Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) program to allow it to continue functioning until the lottery generates dollars for the long- term maintenance of the program. Of this amount, $21 million in bonding authorization would go for land acquisi- tion, with the remainder for needed support staff and services, The governor has recommended $10,8 million of additional money for the environmental trust fund prior to the receipt of lottery funds so that it can begin funding environmental research and education programs. Finally, the environmental portion of the budgct includes an additional $3 .- million from new and expanded forestry activities, $1.5 million for the vehicle emisions inspection program in the Twin City metropolitan area, $1.4 million to assist counties in evaluating contamina- tion at existing solid waste management facilities, and $1.4 million for a com- prehensive regulatory program for municipal solid waste and municipal and industrial waste incinerations, Missing from the budget is any hint of additional or continued funding for waste water treatment facility grants. It is possible, that the governor will rec- ommend providing additional wastewa- ter treatment contruction grant financ- ing assistance in his capitol bonding request, which pursuant to the Constitution must go to the Legislature on or before April 15, 1989.' Cities needing new Or refurbished wastewater treatment facilities should write or otherwise contact Governor Per- pich as soon as possible to ask him to in- clude continued and additional funding in his capitol budget. JJ January 27, 1989 page 5 Governor's budget spending percentages o MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND SPENDING 1990 -19~1 f:1ienium STATE _, OPERATIONS (16.3") ......,.:. OlHER LOCAl ASST (5.3,;) . LOCAl GOvr AID (6,2") DEBT SERVICE (2.9") '<" K-12 EDUCATION (25,''') & ''\ ! o , , I' ! , GOVERNOR'S 1989 RECOMMENDATIONS Nl!Sw.Spending Initiatives AlL OTHER (8.0n) HUWN RESOURCES (14.0") K-12 EDUCATION (14.0") HIGHER EDUCA1l0N / RESEJoRCH (18.0") o page 6 LMC Cities Bulletin .. o " \....... \....... o ~ The Legislature should restore the Minnesota miracle by Governor Rudy Perpich We still call it the "Minnesota '1970s, we now pay more in property, Miracle." taxes than we do in income taxes Time magazine gave our miracle great play-and its name--in the late 1970s with the cover photograph of former Gov. Wendell Anderson. We all took pride in this national recognition, Our miracle was Minnesota's sys- tem of financing local government op- erations with state tax dollars. We used state income and sales taxes to help finance schools and local government. The goal was to hold down property taxes and to provide equal educational opportunities throughout the state. In the early years, the miracle worked. Minnesota's property taxes per capita fell from 15 percent above the national average in I971 to below the D,S, aver- age through 1981. State education fund- ing increased dramatically. Even today, there is much to be pleased with. Property taxes are still low for many Minnesotans, and we have in- creased state aid for many needy com- munities. By those measures, we rank very well when compared with other states. Unfortunately, by most other stan- dards, our state/local finance system has fallen into disrepair. Some of the Iocal- aid formulas developed problems early on, school-enrolhncnt declines upset other formulas, recessions cut state revenues in the early 1980s, and federal funding has dropped consistently since 1981., The problems with our state-local fiscal. system are many and serious. The first is the growth in property taxes. For the first time since the earl v January 27, 1989 In 1988, our property taxes rose by 9.4 percent; this year, they are projected to rise by 7,7 percent. These amounts are '" Each of these formulas is guarded greater than projected inflation and the 6 ~ over by legislators, local-government percent estimated increase in income- leaders and state officials, few of whom , d'l! tax revenues. "',. fully understand the "big picture" of how these various formulas interact and affect overall property-tax rates. When you don't understand a total ,'funding system, it is very difficult to improve pieces of that system' without jeopardizing the goals being sought through other pieces, The last defect in our system is the " absence of accountability. The property tax is a local tax. The state mandates certain local programs, provides tax relief through our state- local aids system, and prescribes how the property-tax system is to be run. But local governmeuts ultimately levy the tax. The lack of political accountability in our state-local system is demonstrated by the results of a recent University of Minnesota survey. Although the state does not levy any property tax itself, 61 percent of the respondents blamed high property-tax bills on state government. State government gets blamed for not doing auything to help. At the same time, local government officials must wrestle with state-imposed mandates and federal funding cutbacks. Nobody wins. So what's to be done? I believe our state/local fiscal sys- tem must be restructured with five goals in mind: *Clarify financial responsibilities. The state should pay more of the costs of those programs which it mandates, and local governments should pay morc of the costs of local programs not man- dated by the state. While our property taxes are grow- ing, so too are stale aids for property-tax relief, This year, the state will send more than $3 billion in state income and sales" taxes back to schools and local govern- ments to help hold down property taxes, That amount equals 65 percent of all state spending. In 1990-91, property-tax relief and : local aids are projected to rise by more than 6 percent a ycar, and pressures will be great to raise that amount further. The second dcfect in our state-Io- ' cal system is the wide disparity in prop- erty-tax rates. Some properties in Min- , ' nesota are now taxed at 0,5 percent of ! value, while business property is taxed at 5.25 percent of value. No other state has such wide disparities between fa- vored and disfavored classes. Some homeowners in Minnesota pay very low taxes relative to tax rates in other states. At the same time, people who do not own their own homes pay (through their rents) some of the highest property taxes in the country. The third defect in our state-local system is its extreme complexity. I can say with confidence that no one person in the entire state fully understands the total state-local finance system. We have highly complex, separate formulas for distributing state aids for schools, roads, public-ernployee pensions, income maintenance, social services, and for providing' general relief to cities, towns and counties. page 7 *Equalize tax burdens. In addition to paying for state mandates, state aid to local governments should also seek to reduce local property wealth differences, The greatest amount of state aids should go to those local governments least able, because of poor local property wealth, to pay for basic local services, *Reduce disparities among prop- erty classes. The wide disparities in tax rates for different property classes should be reduced, with rate reductions tar- geted to those classes that pay uncompe- titively high rates: middle-valued homes, rental housing, cornmercial property. *Simplify the property taxlIocal aids system. The overall system by which the state provides aids and property-tax re- lief must be simplified by reducing the number and complexity of property classes and aid formulas. *Increase local options, Local gov- ernments should be given more options ' to finance the services they and their' citizens h)sire, We made progress toward these goals " in 1988, The 1988 Legislature provided that state-mandated welfare programs are now paid by the state. All local government- aid formulas are now dependent on leg-. islative appropriations; they are no longer "automatic." Finally, local governments must give advance notice to their citi- The Minnesota Department of Ag- zens of proposed tax increases through riculture has' asked the League to pro- annual "truth-in-taxation" reports. vide two voluriteercity officials to serve But much more needs to be,done, 'on a committee which will review and My 1989 budget message to the Legisla- 'make recolnmendations for changes to ture will recornmend further progress', the state's noxious weed laws. toward all five of these goals, lJ The cornmittee's first meeting will The Minnesota Miracle can be re- be in mid to late February. It will tenta- stored, But this will happen only if we all tively meet eight to 12 times over the understand the nature of the, problem next two years. The first meeting will and cornmit to work together toward a common solution. i' Reprinted by permission of the Star Tribune, January 20, 1989 Legislative injury compensa~ion study commission begins hearings The creation of a special legislative commission on injury compensation is the result of the 1988 Legislature facing cries for further tort reform. The 1986 Legislature passed a comprehensive bill with many beneficial changes for cities. The commission will study the civil justice system and alternative methods of comPensating injured persons. , At the commission's first meeting January 25 it heard from interested par- ties reg~dingthe issue of punitive damages: ,:, The hearing was somewhat quiet, sinCe all participants were aware that the U,S, Supreme Court has several cases pending before it dealing with o punitive damages. Members ofthe court have hinted that they would like to see some limitations on the availability and amounts of punitive damages. The following is a schedule of the commission's meetings: Tuesday, Feb- ruary 14, Joint and Several Liability; Thursday, March 16, Comparative Fault; Wednesday, April 12, Statutes of Limi- tation and Repose; Wednesday, May 10; Wednesday, June 14; Wednesday, July , 12. The subjects for the last three meet- ings have not been finalized, The February through April meet- ings will begin at 9:30 a.m. at William Mitchell College of Law in St. Paul. JJ State needs city officials to serve on noxious weed committee " ~ probably be in St. Paul with subsequent meetings in a Greater Minnesota loca- tions such as St. Cloud, Willmar, Little Falls, or other cities, depeuding on the preference of the committee members. City officials, either elected or appointed, who are interested in' serving on this committee should contact Joel Jamnik at LMC by February 9, 1989. JJ o page 8 LMC Cities Bulletin ..... o v Courts/Crime Penalties for serious crimes H.F.82 (Wenzel, Hasskamp, Sparby, Bauerly, Gutknecht) (Judiciary) would provide for life imprisonment without parole for persons convicted of premeditated murder or intentional homicide in the course of committing it drug offense. The crime of first degree murder would include drug~related homicides, and would eliminate juve- nile court jurisdiction over minors 14 years oId or older accused of murder or manslaughter. The bill would increase penalties and impose mandatory mini- mnm sentences for certain violent crimes and prohibit waiver of certain manda- tory minimwn sentences. CB ~ Presentence investigation report requirement H,P' 97 (Hasskamp, Vellenga, Carruthers, Kelly, McGuire) (Judiciary) would require the court to order the preparation of a presentence investiga- tion and report at the request of the prosecutor in a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor case, CB Modification of sentencing guidelines for criminal sexnal conduct H,P' 107 (Marsh, Valento)(Judi- ciary) would increase presumptive sen- tences for persons convicted of criminal '" ,sexual conduct The bill would impose 'a criminal penalty on judges who sen- tence offenders of criminal sexual con- duct less than the mandatory minimwn sentence required by law. CB Economic development o "---' Working capital fund investments for state aDl'llocal agencies . H.P. 42 (McLaughlin, Simoneau) (Economic Development) wonld allow local governments, state agencies (in- January 27, 1989 Bill Summaries r",'" ";, cluding the University of Minnesota), & Natural Resources)wouId require the and metropolitan agencies to contribute" State board of water and soil resources to to guaranty funds that non-profit organi- 'provide cost~shaPng funds in 15 selected zations administer, if the organizations .counties'for sealing abandonedjoVells make loans to businesses that socially or and for properly abandoning um-egu- economically disadvantaged people own lated wells. The bill would, require a and operate. The loans would be 'for statewide assesslllent of groundwater short-tenn working capital to enable these pollution, from \ abandoned ; wellS': and businesses to receive government con-. ; would requite financial and technical tracts.' SH ' ,,:, :,;,;~,,;:;!h":assistance,,; in'.J(ientifying 'and s~aling :il "J', " 'abandoned,wells;:, CB:"t'-+,'; Local jurisdictions could participate ' in secondary markets " " ,.., S.F.' 65 (Dahl) (Economic De- velopment & Housing) would allow'a municipality to, sell notes,' mortgages, and leases, or other instruments, evi- dencing or securing a loan for economic development, job creation, redevelop- ment, orcornmunity revitalization made by public agencies to private individuals or organizations, ; The bill would allow the sale to be either 'public or private, and defines municipality as a home rule charter or statutory city, a'county, ora town. Companion H.P.65. CB ' : ,: r; ,~: ", ~ Elections and ethics .. Voter registration: removal of certain cards ' ",' .' H.F, 72 '(Tunheim,Lieder) (General. Legislation; Veterans Affairs and Gaming) wou,I~,a!1o~, the county auditor to remove both ihe original and duplicate voter regiStnltiQn ~ds of voters " . '-:, -,'. '.': -,", .','-1 who have died while living outside the county, following receipt of a print~d obituary or written notice~f death signed by a registered voter in ,the county. The county may change the voter registra- tion data base when removing such reg- istration car~s, Companion S.P. 204. AH .- .' . ,'..'. ,,-,.}! Environment':, ~ :. ; i.!.,""" , Cost and technical assis~nce for ::1:, sealing abandoned wells."" " I ".', H,F, 89 (Bauerly, McEachern, Munger, Kalis, Redalen) (Environment n' ';Sale and useofpesiicides ."i! l~ '. ',H.P. 108 (Marsh) (Environment &"Natural' Resc;mrces) would, require records of the amou,nts of pesticides peole <.selloruse for,a 1O-year period, People 'who, produce agricultural 'comtllodities iwouId.need to : keep a record'oftheir purchases."The bin: would require a reduction in sales and use of pesticides in ,1989 and 1990, with a further 50 percent reduction by 1995, 'yB;, ;, ,- 'J"..: Connties: PJ:'q-riding opportunity to r~cycle ., ""', ' .,' " ",;, '" S,g ~5 (Lessard, Moe, Merriam. :Benson.. R }>eterson) (Environmer,1t& \N"atura~ Resourc~s) would make ~everal ,~h~nges aml. requirements rdated to :f~y,c~ing, illcludlng the following:',' o require state agencies to purchase certain recycledinaterials which do n~t exceed 10 percent of the price of non- recycled materials; I. , 0 require a review of the Opp~rtll- "nitiesto,recycle in public buildings; Li',':: ,', 0 ~equire thai counties ensure recy- 5Iin~PPPOrtunities by providingat least .fJ,lIe re,cycling ,celltedn each county and J ,~w::~side pick,up ill larger cities; , o require counties to provide for recycling of problem materials such as white goods (stoves, refridgerators, etc.); o require establishment of a public ( in(()fIlliition program and a model school ~!.~cycling program;, '. "'" ,'" ",oallo~~Runties to require,licenses ,l!>ffYc~c~eI;S;"),, ,:, ., '1, 1u\ ",0 unposea state recycling fee of$l per cubic yard of waste; ,I SI o specify collection procedures and estate which does qualify as agricultural use of state fees; property. SH 0, create a 15-member statewideJ),;;' ,( t'..;":,,,:: ','",'., , county reCycling advisory board; ,r':' '~T3x exemption for investigative o impose county recycling service 'services for insurance claims fees based on waste generation; H,F, 62 (Olsen, Poppenhagen, "~,, '0 ; . require the ,licensing 'of waste Hartle) (Taxes) would exempt from the collectors; and ,. ,','i,'.':..., ." ',,'.,l sales tax detective or investigative serv- '10 prohibit disposal ,facilities from ices that an insurance provider performs accepting recyclable!;' or white goods. ,concerning an insurance claim. SH CB'ii !, ':. ,:' ';..,",::.,..:...'" . -:~),' Ii. iiZ';Jtt. :-,.; ,. i~ . > '~(; .)[: {-;6"A:\/. 'f:5;.M~ Mixed municipal solid waste.$Ii",i'f!U(1 disposal. ",' ,1,:;,:);(.;:. \)('[0''' ;":I,'S.F. 154 (Dahl, Laidig. Olson) (Environment & Natural Resotm:es) would eliminate the metropolitan inventory sites suitable for mixed muniCipal solid waste dispOsal faCilities and would allow met- ' ropolitan counties to release the : pro- posed sites. The pollution control agency would need to develop a plan to provide, adequate' incentives' to 'metropolitan counties' to volunteer'sites suitable for mixed municipal solid,wastedisposal facilities. CB'll t.'_bt; Br'~~ij;;'A;L;';l ~ ~ , ! u~.j;~ I lj~Jf; t~;sV { .tIi Finance and revenue,::"'''q .' ;~. ';_ -' '- -' .", : - ,.<1 Constitutional amendment to limit state spending, ,," :1 ., ': ' H,F, '34 (Onnen,' Girard, McDonald) (Ways & Means) WOlIld plaCe a constitutional amendment ort the 1990 ", ~ , .' ,:: - . .-' ,~, ;. -'. '.' " -' 1- J'-. I .. , genera,tba~lot torestrict~wt~;i~vs~~e appropnations to the percentage IRcrease in the conswner price indc;((CPi) f6r the preCeedlng two calendar'y6uS."SH ',;1,1 "':i. ,.-"" :'c !-'! ':', ' ',' Property owners to vote' oil debt " ;,. obligations " ' '. 'H.F. 50 (Begich)(L<iciII GOvetrt- merit & Metropolitan Affairs) would ; extend voting priviledges to all property" i 6wrters within a municipality for deci- sions authorizing debt,regari:llessofthClr place of residence. SH Tax' deferment of agricultural property ',,' ' " , !,' H.F. 55 (Blatz;MiUiert, Daune!-) (Taxes) would relax requirements' for entitlement to valuation and tax 'defer- ment for agricultural property.' ProPerty would qualify if it is "farmed with" real , '. ,c_,:[ ", .;J.<. , Recalculation of local government :,debt limits d U...:'" ,*";1,, S,F, 99 (Doug Johnson) (Taxes , & Tax Laws) would modify the compu- tation for allowable debt limits for local governments, cities, and school districts. The bill would allow disparity and debt computations based on adjusted gross tax capacity. 'Generally, the bill would , limit net; debt to two percent of the market ,value:of taxable property in municipalities (now 7.3 3 percent of gross tax capadty).E,The bill would allow home rule charter cities to issue capital 'notes for certain equipment up to 0,03 :percent of the market value of taxable property (now 0.10 percent of gross tax capacity). Under the bill, statutory cities could issue such notes up to 0.25 percent of the market value of taxable property, The bill would adjust special law or city ,charter debt limits by changing the cal- culation to the percentage of gross tax capacity, and would modify the tax in- crement financing, district provisions , relative 'to" districts' certified in 1988, ,The debt limit changes proPosed in this bill, which is currently on general orders in both the House and Senate, are in- tended to restore cities to approxirllately I' '." , '" ' .. the same debt limits they had prior to the )988 t3J( la\V pa~sage which, because of ithechange from assessed valuation to ,gross tax capaCityas the basis for calcu- ;Iating propertytlxes, slashed govern- inent debt liIriits to 1/8 of theil' previous 'amounts, CB ' :.~: ;,' ~) ~'.: '-" .c ',) t. :.;;:: :'.:. " .,:" Sales tax to Include new clothing, exclude capital equipment S.F. 174 (Diessher) (Taxes & Tax Laws) would include new clothing under the' sales tax and provide for a refunded credit to offset the tax based on the number of personal income tax ex- iemptions., The bill would appropriate necessary amounts to pay for the credit. The sales tax exemption would remain for used clothing. The bill would add repair or replacement machinery and equipment to the definition of capital equipment and totally exempt capital equipment from the, sales tax. SH Reduction of tax capacity rates for commercial/industrial property , S,F, 175 (Samuelson) (Taxes & . Tax Laws) would change the tax capaci~" ;: ties 'on conimercfallindustrial property to taxes based on: . 1.65 percentontht':'" first $100,000 of market value;"2:63 ",' percent of market value between $100,000' ..,. and $200,000; and 5.25 percent of the' market value above $200,000, Current tax capacities are: 3.3 percent of the first $100,000 and 5.25 percent'of the mllrket value over $100,000.' ThebilLwould appropriate necessary' fundsfn>nphe general fund to reimburse the depart- ments of revenue' and education" for decreased revenues due to lowered tax capacity rates, The value of reduction in taxes would be shown as credit on prop- erty tax statements. Effective for taxes levied in 1989, payable in 1990, and thereafter. SH Gambling Department of gaming to supervise,; , lottery .. ,; H.P. 66 (Kostohryz, Vanasek, Schreiber, Quinn, Bennet) (General Legislation, Veterans Affairs & Gam- ing) would establish a state-operated lottery, and establish a department of gaming to supervise the lottery, pari- . mutuel horse racing, and charitable gambling. The bill would transfer the duties of the charitable gambling control board and the Minnesota racing com- mission to this department The bill would prohibit the sale of lottery tickets at on-sale liquor establisluneuts, and make appropriations. CB General government 'r: Video and library privacy act S.P. 72 (Cohen) (Judiciary) would impose civil liability on video tape serv- ice providers who knowingly disclose S2 LMC Cities Bulletin . l I ,~ o r,\ o -I "'-/ ~; o L information, that identifies the consumer. I, ,Disclosure exceptions would exist for Ti I law enforcement agencies under a court" '.((:,lorder, for a third party with the lawful :;:,i..,wrltten consent of the consumer, and for ,;q);.Civi! court orders. The bill would make (,;,:libraries subject to the same liabilities' . and exceptions, The bill would provide : for civil remedies for unlawful disclo- L'ii;;sure and require destruction of person- <i,ally identifiable information within one year after it is no longer necessary for the , purpose for which ,it was collected" CB "t-:"; Of"" ,Townships: Establishment of 'd" ,subordinate Service .districts :, " . , , S.F, 119 (Schmitz,Adkins,:Vick- ,I' erman, Renneke, p'ariseau) (Local & ,:;; Urban Govenunerit) would authorize , ,.i -towns to establish . subordinate service '. i iiddistricts to provide ,and finance various "'! govenunental services for their residents. , , ;".: "rhe bill would authorize the creation of. a district by petition signed by 50 per- cent of the qualified voters in the pro- , posed district. ,The bill would, authorize reverse referendum, and would allow a tax ,or ,service charge to finance the in- ',,' creased service.CB,,: j:~ . "Town powers S.F.120 (Adkins, Schmitz, Vick- eonan, Renneke, Pariseau) (Local & Urban Govenunent) would allow a town to employ an attorney for town business and would allow it to, contract for the " ,rental of equipmentifthe cost is $60,000 or less. The bill would require that town boards approve county plats, CB, ' Unpaid service charges S,F, 121 (Adkins, Schmitz, Doug Johnson, Bernhagen, Pariseau) (Local , & Urban Govenunent) would allow town , boards to certify unpaid service charges , to the county auditor for collection with property taxes, CB Audit task force S.F. 123 (David Frederickson, Schmitz, McQuaid, Adkins,OIson) . ' (Govemnental Operations) would create, . :"" a task force to promulgate an audit guide <,' for legal compliance audits. The ,task ,,:: force' would include representatives of , ;;",.the state anditor, the attorney general, ! -,,::towns, cities, counties, school districts, )anuary 27,1989 -'-" ,""'^;';-'"" ti, p~~~~st:~to~,~~b!if;~~ountant~:":,~,etrop~~itan " '.'. '-.' . , , '."i',"'~-' ;;t.:-":f\:I~tropolitan council, term of chair Co~ntyand town planning and .') o~" ,"HRllO (Kelly; Vellenga, Oren- zonmg SF 158 (Adki' D 'd F d " "stein; Weaver) (Local Govenunent & . . .', . ns, aVI re er-, MetropolitanAffairs) would set the teon ,lckson,Schffiltz, ~ennt:ke, Bernhagen) of the chair of the Metropolitan Council (Lo~1 & Urban, Govenunent) Wo?ld at fOUf ears:1CB" " modify: statutory,Janguage, allowmg y "., inconsistent town, standards which aren'"p ,',' , ' 'I";; " not less restrictive than county, stan,(;,.."e.r~on","<<r,.; dards, The bill would would not apply to it'" ,."r' .'" ' comprehensive plans and establishmentp, ~~rt~tinteemp'oyees and of zoning districts.'<::~e;;':;,':. ! \:llt;~~p!()yme~t;Policies ,..', '"i',., ,,',. ,f,!; ,>', , . ,dlb'i';,,;,' l,f~I'.19D(A,. J~bnson,Simoneau, Nationalski patrol.liability. . 'l;,,-.(:R., ,Johj1solk ~11kavina, R. Anderson) immunity':";,,,, ?" ;'~l':". ','n~i,~q~.v~~~P!!i~ppt:I<ltions). wouI,d re- S.F; 172 (Diessner, DougJohnso.n';f'"quil:e~I:~qll~~l.summaries toli~t em- Bertram, Chmielewski, Dicklich) (Judi.h:IJ.l~?yee;~tatU~i(f,uIYparttime). .The bill ciary) ,would' provide immunity . from.{,,"YouI4I:1lake~itA.st.ate,policy, to!avor ,liability for volunteer members of the...JuIl~tirr1t:.' emploYfilent, , and it.wouId Natio.nal Ski Patro.l System.,CB,,",;;reqt1i~.astu4ypf qenel'its given.tq full "' ,"',." ''''~I "d , , t;;fl;!ln~part-m.ne employees to.deteonine Collection and diSsemination of data ',j"pay equity..;The, bill would reqnire a ,." S,F.178 (R.;l>eterso.n) (Judici.,,,,repoJ,1: on.~!1efit eligil1ility, and ~o.uId ary) wo.uId enact theunifoon info.onlb"wak,e all sta!e,empl()yees eligib~e fo.r tio.n practices code and repeal the go.V~d.;,;stat~-pa!d life)ns\lra~c~. an4,h9spitaI, ., enunent data practices act. (Many vieW::u:~~~ca,I,a~~,?~,ri.tal~nefits":SB,,.. the unifoflll, inforp13tion'practicecode';:J"""";' ,.,f' ,,' i~";",,! " ".'., >1. as a more easily administered statute" Regulatioit,of,!llectroulcmo.uitoring , than the current cla~sification system.) of emplo.yees' , " CB ;,'"", .'i",j;'.:;;. ", ' ,.."...."S.F.76(LantryPiper R.Peter- . ']",l> ,,,' ., r ',' ";'~~~',"Men:i#;'Knaak.) (Em~lo~ent) HeaIth c~;e info.rm~il~ri., ;" ;W0IJ1cl require'allfmployers to give \Vrittcn ." S,F." 179 (R~Peterson, Merriam) "no.tice,to,allempIoyees and prospt:ctive (Judiciary) would Im)vide forcqnditio.ns,;;:,empIoyee~ ;qescribing any, electronic fo.rthedisclosure of health care in forma- monitoririg.Air~~iIy, affecting empIoy- tionand enact the uniform health care ees. The bill 'would require the em- infonruition act'I'he bill wo.uId provide ployer to. provide a signal light, beeping penalties: CB ' '., , ton,' e, o.r some" other indication thatelec- .. .'... . .'.,,"";',.' tronic monito.ring is taking place. The -;. ~,.. Manufactured ho.mepark purchases bill would reqnire employers to. grant S.F. 18? (Merriam, F~ank" accesSlo thetlmpIo.yee of all perso.naI McQuaid, MOfse;'Storm) '(Economic';'data'obtained by electronic monitoring Development&Ho.using)WOuldrequire", and would Prohib1t an employer from that before a manufactured homepark"i"disclo.sing such personal data without . o.wner makes a final acceptance o.f an)?!: the employee's written consent. Viola- offer for the sale of the park, the owner: \ lions would constitute a mi~demeanor, must no.tify a resident of each manufacc'" and repeat offenses a gross ffilsdemeanor. tured bo.me o.f the' sale price at least 60 " The ~ill wouIdallo.w damage awards of days' before' executing, any agreement ;'at least $1,000 and additional damages if fo.r the sale. During the notice period, a ,J" th,e' violatio.n was willful. CB' . . . . ' , .' ~ .~: ~ 11 tl,l. '" cooperative aSSOCiation of residents would' '.' '.' , " have the . first optio.n to purchase the,'.Wor"ersi compensation ",'; manufactured home park and 60 days to 'n'."', l!;)' S,F. 82 (Stuinpf, Langseth, Moe) obtain the necessary financing. CB (Emplo.yment) wo.uld require that em- ployee examinations take place at a 83 r location within 150; miles. of: the] em.: L! Provisional driVer's license, increase "' Motor vehicle excise tax ployee's residence unless the employer age to 21 H.P.47(Lieder,Kalis,R.Johnson) can show cause to order an examillation S.F.139 (Spear)(Judiciary) would ' (Transportation) would allocate 35 per- c:. atalocationfurtheraway.,Anemployer increase-the age for a provisional driver's ' cent'(currentIy 30 percent) of the tax ,', ,would need to payreasonabl~;tJavel license to 21 years, and would provide revenue from the motor vehicle excise , expenses, if requested, CB,i:Jhi ,,,' for a 30-day'suspension of a minor's '"tax to the highway user tax distribution L",(' ':, ", ;,c.,:, '),Hi\ 'UlC,licenseformisrepresentationofagefor'" fund and the transit assistance fund in Unemployment compensation ror l,', - purposes of purchasing alcoholic bever-" fiscal 1990:The bill would increase that part-time employers' 'ages, The bill would provide penalties ': . allocation to 40 percent of the tax reve- S.F. 107 (Bertram) (Employment) . for the fraudulent misuse of Minnesota'. nue after June 30, 199(t" Tbe bill would would modify and broaden the'unem-il identification cards as well as driver's ." repeal the sunset provision thatelirni- ployment exception/exemption for part~l dicenses. ' CB' 'nated localfunding.' CB " ,.; time employers who continue'part~time'''';, ;0; ')';" ',,; "'. "'i empIoyment.CurrentIy; the law will not Good samaritan death benefits '; Highway signs: Maintenance i" require unemployment compensation to S.F, 161 (Bertram)(Governmen- H.F. 83 (Ulsley, Brown,WaltInan, be paid to employees laid off from their tal Operations) would include good Battaglia, Lieder) (Transportation) would < :ntuU..time jobs by tbeirpart.tinie eniploy... samaritans as peace officers' for death ~:), appropriate money to the commissioner L" ers iftheirpart-time'employercontinuesL benefitpuipoSes, withoutlimitation. CB' of transportation from the state-aid and .r." _' _' ",,' .'.' -c, ',' '. '..' >>,.'to'provide the individual with regularly<iliL) ,;:'h]" " .oJ;, 'trunk highway fundsfor themainte- ": " Scheduled pait-timeemploymentiipProxi-Hi.f.Peace officer'death benefits ' nance, replacement, and removal of in- ""lIlat1ey90perCentofpastpart~furieworkH :i! ;::;S;F.'162 (Bertram)(Governmen-. ' formational highway.signs.,:The bill :", or if the individual was a part.4inle'fire- tal Operations) would classify as peace would prohibit the cornmissioner, after ,; i'fighter or ambulance squadffieffibei- and, officies, for the purposes of death bene- , June 30, 1989, from charging a fedor 'their status has not changed/ 5enator:" fits, certlfilid first responders who'per- "such services, CB ,,,,,,i, Bertram's bill would change' tIlecmrent>>' fonn basic 'emergency care before the!!:. , 10l , law to exempt fromunempliiyinent" arrival- of' a:D' ambulance ilOd are mem- , Trucks: U~ Of left lane of highways i, : 'compensation liability employers'who;;' bers ofan organized service; CB' in the Twin Cities area '.,! cOntinue to providepart-time'emploY':i '~,' ,;'li,':",: . ,,' iii H.F. 99 (Las1ey,Simoneau, Henry) ment substantiall~~qual to th~ pa~~time :': Speciallegislatiori-:"" (Transportatio~) would restrict certain employment prevlOuslyfur1l1shed:" JJ ~,,",.. ., ,,"1... c' ",'Ill,' trucks from uS11lg the left lane of con- , ",'" '. ",;,,,,. lj). (."i:" . . ii"';::''':;:; , " .i; ',,: trolled access interstate highways in the 't. ," ,', ,'" , ,',. ':' :, " Kandiyohi County: Rural . . .' '" .' . ,: " Co~parable wo~ implementati.on ' development fiance authority ~111 CIties are~: The bl~I would reqUIre . ' ,S,F. 130 (R~I~hgott,Pog~ller, S.F.) 35 (Dean Johnson) (Agri- ' s~ltab!e traffic-con~ol signs, and make J': ~per,' Ma~) (Jud~clary) woul~ e.~tab~Hi"CU1t~, &', ~~~inDeveloPllleitt) would ,,,~lOlatiOn a~~~,~lsdemeanor. CB ";"~~:;~~~n t~ :~~::~i:C=~:1,t", c authlodn,z, ecrl "~,' a~I,.?',n,'t,ofif~,K, a~d,' iYth(),h1.CtOu~tthY;i Brid~e, ,s,' tandard clarification' i;,',,';~ . . 'd Jl "Ii' rum eve opmen mance au on y WI, ! , _ ,.:}~~ practice base U~? sex. ~'. ,"the pOwerS ora iede~elopmeriiagency.: ' S.F.l?O <,Frank; Lan~..Beck- :: ' " .JI;) ""'Acoriunis'sio'nboard whicilwouldhave man) (Transportation) would clanfy that A, 'twomemIJers of theWillmar City coun- bridges, including those pJivately owned, ",Pub.lie safety ';,"~,"..\.;", C',' :".,1;)1 cil as commissioners, wouldnianagethe m.ust meet state standards Of,s"tr~ngth, ,\ 1 .\ :;tfh~ll dh I ti CB :,;",., ",:." ' ::',"::"".i:' Wd "").,authorit~';,~,H)'",,, ..., ' WI t ,cearance;saety.'""'," It",.~l1~terrain vehicles--regulation '''h, ",;i;;; i, ""illi; ." S.F, 124 (Vickerman, Frank) ".Transportation . (Environment &, Natural Resources);, ' " ", , , "" ' i" i" . '. . , I ~ ';, t . ,", : ~', I tJ.'. t:", J: , !:. t . d~':,) ,.,,)Vould modify th~ regi~tration require-" 'State transportation bonds for JIlentsforall-terra11lvehlcles(ATV),and" bridges '. -";, ",;" .' .,(,.,1 ,.,al~ow a penn~ent registration fee f?r..., H,F. 46 (Kalis, Lieder) (Trans- ,pnvate or ~gncultural. use.Th~ MILl portation) would increase state transpor- ie, i)V~uld modify ~e accl~ent ~port re~) ,tation bonds for bridges by $32 million qurrements, reqUIre a dri".er's bcens: to" (from$52to$84million). Oftheamount o~~ ~ A!", and would 1Illpo8e vehicl~ ,; appropriated, in excess of $52 million, , Slze lumtations for operators under th~.; , the bill prohibits spending more than $8 ' age of16. The bill would require Dli?~rs" million in any of the fiscal years 1990 to . to wear. a .helmet and wouIdallow Cltie~,," 1993 inclusive. CB' " to prohibIt ATV street use. CB . 'I: Car phones; prohibition ofhand~ held models while driving S.P. 118 (Dicklich) (TranspOrta- tion) would prohibit the use of hand- held telephones while operating a motor vehicle. CB ;; ,;", ~ I , .t; " ' , Motor vehicle excise tax, allocation of funds . . S.F; 127 (Frederick, McGowan, Renneke, Decker, Pariseau) .(Transpor~ tation) would allocate all the tax reve- nues from the motor vehicle excise tax to the highway user tax distribution fund (75 percent) and the transit assistance fund (25 percent). CB LMC Cities Bulletin _c,'.,' ,S4 o I I 1 ~ I ----------, --.:--- --- ,~ ~'c"/'>"f._; ~ Federal 'Update , Reagan 1990 budget would cut some citYJunds o G The spiraling federal debt and the federal govemment's lack of priority for problems facing cities have left city officials with bare pickings in the pro- " , posed federal budget for FY '90, It remains to be seen whether President Bush will reverse spending and taxing priorities of the previous proposals made by the Reagan administration, The Reagan administration pro- posal would significantly reduce the following programs to help cities meet human and environmental needs.h( ~ Community dev.elopment . Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - reduction of 11.6 per- cent, from the current $2,8billion level of funding to $2,7 billion, The elimina- tion of the 312 Rehabilitation Loan Program would provide $1.36 billion of that revenue as well as $50 milliou from FY'88 UDAG funds. Economic Development Admini- stration (EDA) - elimination of the en- tire agency and grant assistance to cities through the Economic Development Administration. Industrial Development Bonds (IDBs) - tennination oflocal authority to issue as of Dec. 31, 1989. , Energy Conservation Grants - elimination of entire program. Rural Development Grants - elimination of all funding. Urban Development ,Action Grants (UDAG)--zero funding in keep- ing with actions of 1988 Congress, Low Income Energy Assistance- cut 25 percent. Housing assistance Subsidized Housing - 16 percent cut to $6.6 billion - a decrease of $500 million from FY'89 and even less than the level appropriated in FY'88 ($6.9 billion). January 27,1989 Programs slated to be reduced or eliminated include Nehemiah Housing Opportunity Grants, 108 Loan Guaran- tees, Section 235 Homeownership As- sistance and Section 236 Rental Hous- , ing Assistance; Section 202 programs for the elderly and handicapped; public housing development and reconstruc- tion funds; and funds for Neighborhood Development Demonstration Programs. Replacement for expiring rental assistance contracts (included in the $6,6 million above) - $667 million to preserve present stock of low income housing stock at risk, including Section 8 and federally assisted housing that face contract expiration orpre~payments and conversion to market rate housing, Homeless Assistance - 50 percent reduction overall (to $339 million) from level authorized under the McKinney Actfor 1990. ' "' " Emergency Shelter ~ tennination of entire program. The replacement would be a transfer to HUD (from FEMA) of the Emergency Food and Shelter Program ala $114 million funding level for FY'90. ' Supplemental Programental As- sistance - tennination of funds to facili- ties assisting the homeless. Transitional & Supportive Hous- ing Program - cut by $37 million below FY'89 (to $71 million) for FY'90, Section 8 Moderate Rehab Single Room Occupancy - increase of $28 million (to $73 million) for FY'90. Environment Wastewater Treatment - reduc- tion of 50 percent below authorized levels for FY'90 ($1.2 billion rather than $2.4 billion). Only $800 million would be available for state revolving loan pro- grams instead of the $1.2 billion author- ized and the $941 million appropriated for FY'89. For actual grant assistance, only $400 million would be available as compared to the $941 million appropri- ' ated for FY'89. Superfund - increase of$164 mil- lion for clean-up of sites on the National Priorities ,List and an increase of $6.9 million for EPA enforcement activities. Underground Storage Tanks - increase of $47.6 million (to $90.1 mil- lion) to states to implement trust fund programs to aid clean-up of leaking tanks for which no owner or operator can be identified. Safe Drinking Water - increase , of $IO.3 million for assistance to states , to implement and enforce national drink- ing water standards on public utilities. . Drawing a comparison between FY'90 proposed budget for key city programs funded by the federal govern- ment with the funding levels appropri~ ated in FY'81 provides some stark con- trasts . In 1981, the total budget authority forCDBG was $3.694 bill ion; for FY'90 the funding proposal is $2.65 billion. The total budget for wastewater treatment construction grants was $3.4 billion in 1980; funding authorized for grants from 1982-1985 was set at $2.4 billion per year. For 1990, the proposed level would be $1.2 billion, a 38.4 per- cent drop from 1989-90. Assisted housing budget authority in 1981 was $26.689.billion; for 1990 it , is, recommended at $6.592 billion, ./) Loss of Drug Abuse Grants for Cities A final budget cut directed at cit- ies is the proposal to tenninate all drug , abuse grants to cities, eliminating $75 million authorized by the '88 Congress. AH Fl I....:.. -. fiRST Ct.ASS . LJ,S, pOSTAcr PAID 0., 51, P"ul,MN PI RMIT NO, 3223 ".- ,; League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Avenue. East "f St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 Phone: 612-227-5600 ":";' FAX: 612-221-0986, tt:: !,." 'James E. Schrantz Admr. 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N;W. , Andover, MN 55304 ,'. !:. ~ )./ ;', .;;!~nh;_; '; :' ':, i " -I_~i:.~ ",;}, ' ,'~'l k I,:.;" ',i ':'i-', )U..: I: ::.;..- i;:,h i .b I:,;, -. ~,;: '\~ :>.,', '. ; \ ,- ;, ;U: ;;.' ;, ;' ~V'~ -; i:-i\':' , :! ~ . . '.,' .. -, , Copi~s'ofbills" ",' " " "', . , HouseChiefCierk's Office - 296-2314, Rm. 211, State CapItol Secretary of Senate's Office - 296-2343, Rm. 231, State Capitol , , ~ League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Staff> <').;'" ,.;;:1 Joel Jamnik Environment; personnel, ,( (" , "', public safety, general govem-'" ment Laurie Hacking- , LGA, taxes, finance Stanley Peskar , " Pensions, personnel, public: i. safety '.,h, . ~ Donald Slater ' Development tools' , Ann Higgins ' Federal legislation, elections, ethics Sarah Hackett Legislative analyst' Barry Ryan' ,I,';,.' Tax policy analyst, . Chuck Bichler Legislative assistant Where to get legislative information at the Capitol*' ' Bill status, authors, companion; commIttee referral (by bill number, author, or topic), _,",. House Index - 296-6646, Rm. 211, State Capitol " Senate Index - 296-2887, Rm. 231 State Capitol Weekly committee schedules, bill introductions, and summaries of committee and Door action ' , House Information Office - 296-2146, 175 State Office Building , Senate Information Office - 296-0504, Rm. 231; State Capitol Recording ~f the folIowing day's committee schedule and agenda, (after 4:30 p.m.), ' " "House Call" (House committee schedule) - 296-9283 Senate Hotline (Senate committee schedule) - 296-8088 To reacha;me~ber on the House or Senate Door House Sergeant at Arms - 296-4860 Senate Page Desk - 296-4159 ! , ASsociation of Metropolitim Municipalities Legislative Staff '~ Vern Peterson;, ,. ,Executive DireCtor' :Roger Peterson '.' . . Director of Legislative Affairs' To notify the governor's office of your concerns Governor Rudy Perpich - 296-3391, Rm, 130, State Capitol *AIl addresses are St. Paul, MN 55155, all area codes 612 ~;; {r ~, ((;,,1.:: o ;;...'d '-', "t ;:I;-',lJ~~ i ,--,,- I .- COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS' SPECIAL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1988 o Ttle Boat~d of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held a special Meetinq on December 12, 1988 at the Bun.<er ~iills Activities Center to discuss ongoing business. Pt"esent : Others: Mel Schulte, Willis Pete,'soy, (7:13 p.m. >, Ga,-y Beck (7:10 p.m. >, Ken Slyzuk, Paul Williams Hare.ld Sheff, Si 11 Weider.bachet", Ed Matthiesen, Al SaYlnet"ud, Torlt Je.hnsc'YI ChairmaYI Schulte c.peYled the rileeting at 7:00 p. m. C\Yld asked the staff if there were any additions to the agenda. TOM Johrlsc,y, added item 7." Resoll.,tioY,88-22, and Paul Williams added item 8., Business cards and naMe tags. Paul Williams Moved the agenda be approved with the stated additions and the option to include furttler items as the meeting progressed. Motion seconded by Ken Slyzuk. Motion carried wi th a votel:-f th,,"ee yeas aYld no nays. No one spoke during the open mike period. Mir....ltes f,,"olU the November 28, 1988 special meeting were reviewed. Paul Williams moved the minutes be approved with the deletion of sentence four of paragraph six, page one which reads "Each of the categories carried a weighted vall.\e of 20. If MCltion seconded by Ken Slyzl.lk. Motion carY'ied with a vote of thY'ee yeas arid y,o Ylays. The District Ad.,inish'ator ,-epo,'ted letters had been sent to all municipalities in the District Y'equesting their official appointment of a Y'ep,,"esentative to the advis.:-ry corl1mittee. Columbus Township and the City of Blaine have responded in writing. Telephone ponversations have indicated that Coon Rapids will respond shortly, Ham Lake will include Coon Creek's request on the agenda for their December 19, 1988 meeting and AndoveY' will address it at their December 20, 1988 meeting. Telephone COYrve""sations with individuals who have been asked to serve on the committee because of stat'.to,'y requit'er"ents indicate that Maynard Apel and Ed Fields will be responding. Commissioner Margaret Langfeld has been contacted, but is out of town. The Soil and Water Conservation District has also been contacted. The District Administrator stated the report from the State Auditor's office will recommend that the Watershed District levy on all ditches having a deficit balance. Because it isn't practical to levy on all ditches for the year pay '90, staff t"ecommeY,ds ,,"edeterrl1ining benefits oy, Ditches 57, S8 and 59 and levying up to $40,000 on ditches 57 and 59 for pay '90 in orde,," to reduce the deficits. A similar amount would be levied each yea"~ in succeeding years until the defici t is ze,,"o. Counsel provided the Board with a memo outlining the statutory ,,"eq'Ji,,"ements fot~ redetermining benefits under chapter l06A. These steps are to be reviewed by staff befo,,"e implementation after the Board has given al.lthori zat iCln to p,,"c.ceed wi th the project. Staff recommended the Watershed District move forward on Ditches 57 and 59 as soon as possible using Minnesota Statutes chapter 473 as the method of improvement and chapter l06A as the method lIsed for redetermining benefits. o Page 2. Coon Creek Watershed District - December 12, 1988 o A great deal of engineering tiMe has been required to Meet the inl111ediate needs .=.f the City ,of Blaine (Happy AC'f"es pOYld, Ditch 60 and the approp'f'iate site or sites to aCCOMModate the National Sports Center) as well as the construction of the Nat ional Sp':.t"ts Centet" and the increased intet"est in determining whether the Central Avenue Acres area can be devel.~ped. When the projects MeYltioned above are corl1pleted, Ditch 44 will receive prOMpt attention. Financing the improveMent of Ditch 44 still needs eHtensive study. Staff has contacted the DNR who have indicated intet"est in a good wot"kiYlg relationship with the Watershed District and providing fllonetat"'Y suppc.t"t fot" the project. (DNR 'f"esponse per phOYle cC'Ylvet"sat i C'YIS of I ast week.) R lette,' was sent to Jay McLiYlden, Rnoka County Administrator, requesting a meeting to review the three amendments wh ich havet"ecei ved CCWD Board appt"oval. County Commissioners and city staff frOM Blaine and Andover will also be invited to attend this informational meeting to discuss the iMpact of each elf the pt"'oJects on the t"espective cities. The meeting has been scheduled for December 27, 1988 at 10:00 a.m. at the Rnoka County Highway Building on Bunker Lake Blvd. R letter confirming the meeting will be sent to all interested parties. The Board reviewed a drafted response to Jay McLinden's letter dated May 17, 1988. The Board also reviewed an abbreviated response drafted by Paul Williams. Paul Williams moved the abbreviated version be forwarded to Jay McLinden, seconded by Ga,'y Beck. Motion carried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. Staff recommended the Board authorize a levy to obtain funds under MN Statute section 112,61, subd. 8. The monies from the Survey and Data Rcquisition Fund could be used to fund Coon Creek' s po,'t ion of suppo,'t dolla,'s fo," the surface and ground water study proposed by the Rnoka County Soil and Water Conservation District. (Support approved by a vote of 4-0 on November 21, 1988, Resolution 88-19.) The Board i nst"llcted staff to p"epa"e a p,'oposal to be ,-eviewed when the 1990 budget is p,-epa,'ed. The District Rdministrator reviewed Willis Peterson moved the bills for presented, seconded by Mel Schulte. vote of four yeas and no nays. The follows: Rnoka County Union & Shopper, Inc. - Publication of notice Minnesota Blueprint - Negatives for city maps Advantage Rdvertising & Graphic Services - Color prints for MSR 509 amendments Minnesota State Ruditor - through period ended 11/8/88 Rick Johnson - Ditch inspection Olson, Gunn and Seran, Ltd. - Legal services E.R. Hickok & Rssoc. - Engineering (509) R. M. Sannerud & Rssoc., P. R, Rcct./Rdr.. - General fund R. M. Sanne'"lld & Assoc., P. A. - Projects R.M. Sannerud & Rssoc., P.R. - MSR 509 the bills to be paid. payment be approved as Motion carried with a bills to be paid are as $ 18.36 131. 70 472.00 3,399.12 314.10 8,,427.72. 563.28 8,074.65 Rcct. IRdm. 1,034.65 Acct. IAdr.. 166.25 o Page 3. Coon Creek Watershed District - December 12, 1988 o Tt,e District Administrator reviewed the activities of the Metro Association of Watershed District's annual meeting. The business Meeting began at 9:00 a.M. on Friday, December G, 1988, and ran through the lunch hour. Concurrent seminars began at 1:45 p.m. on 1) M~nagers' Responsibilities and Duties and MBWSR Relationstlip, 2) Direction of Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, 3) Watershed Districts' Rc.le iY"I Wate,,'" Allclcaticrn, and 4) GCIVet"'nl"tlent I Ylt et"'act ion. The District ~dministrator attended the session on managers' responsibilities and duties and the MBWSR relationship. One of the subjects discussed was additional services the districts would like the MBWSR to offer to help strengthen l.:ocal pt"'ogt"ams. The Distt"ict Rdministt"atcl'" addt"'essed the unqualified opinion (highest and best rating) that the Coon Creek Watershed District would be receiving from the State Auditc.t..., s clffice. He also addt'essed the chart erf accc.unts that had been established as a result of the audit and erlcolu"'aged the BCla,,"'d of Watet.. and Scd I Rescrurces to erldorse the Coon Creek chart of accounts as a standard to be adopted by all the Minnesota districts. A standard chart of accl=,unts wl:ruld pt"ovide mot'e aczcurate cOll1pat"isons of expeYlditut"'es frc'rI1 OYle distt"'ict to BYlc.thet.... The District Administrator also encouraged the BWSR to establish a ~tandard chart of accounts as soon as possible to provide uniform reporting between the districts. The following resolutions were passed at the annual meeting: a resolution recommending a statutory change inct"'easing the adrnirdst,,"ative fllrld for Watet"shed Distt"'icts, a resolution for a statewide stream maintenance program, a resolution supporting adequate funding for the Board of Watel'''' and Soil Resc1ut"'ces, a t"esolution fot" a statewide gt"'oundwatet.. managemerlt pt"'cIQ,,"am, arid a resal ut ion for a statewide lake and stream gauging pt"'ogram. A resollJtion fot.. a statewide shoreland management local government assistance program did not pass. Permit applications submitted to the Metropolitan Council by the Corps of Engineers for the Ham Lake Business Park and by the Bunker Hills Regional Park for a boundary change were listed for information only. The Board reviewed the 1989 meeting schedule and Resolution 88-21 - Resolution to adopt the 1989 meeting schedule for the Coon Creek Watershed District. Paul Williams moved Resolution 88-21 be adopted, seconded by Ken Slyzuk. Motion carried with a vote of four yeas and one nay (Beck - opposed to meeting twice per month during January and February.) 88-21 RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1989 MEETING SCHEDULE FOR THE COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RESOLUTION Mr. Williams offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, WHEREAS regllla.- rneetings of the Coon Creek Watershed District Board of Managers will be held on the second and fourth Mondays of the month unless noted; and o WHEREAS regular meetings will begin at 7,00 p.m. during the rnoYlths of JaYluary, Feb,,"'uary, Ma,,"ch, Novernbet... and Decsrt1ber, and at 8,00 p.m. during the months of April, May, June, July, August, September and October; and Page 4. C':oc'n Ct'eek Wate,'shed Dist,'ict - Decembe,- 12, 1988 WHEREAS all meetings will be held at the Bunker Hills Activities CeYlter, RClortl lie", lInless cltherwise iY'ldicated;. o NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Coc,n Ct'eek Watershed District Board of Managers adopts the attached schedule of ,-egu 1 a" meet i ng dates fo,' 1989. The motion was seconded by Mr. Slyzuk. The quest ion was on the adopt ion elf the )''''esolut ion and the roll being called, there were four yeas and one nay as follows: Schulte, yea Petersc1n., yea Beck, Ytay Slyzuk, yea Wi 11 iams, yea and so the resol ut icon was adopted. Paul M. Williarns Secretary COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MEETI NG SCHEDULE 1989 All meetings will be held at the Bunker Hills Activities Centet', Room lie", unless othe.....wise indicated. January 9, 1989 - 7:00 p.m. January 23, 1989 February 13, 1989 February 27, 1989 March 13, 1989 March 27, 1989 (Room D) " ApI" ill 0, 1989 8: 00 p. m. April 24, 1989 May 8, 1989 May 22, 1989 June 12, 1989 J'Jne 26, 1989 July 10, 1989 July 24, 1989 August 14, 1989 August 28, 1989 September 11, 1989 September 25, 1989 October 9, 1989 October 23, 1989 November 13, 1989 November 27, 1989 December 11, 1989 December 18, 1989 8:00 p.m. " If It " 7:00 p.m. " The dinner meeting for city officials, hosted by the Watershed District (approved at the Nov, 14, 1988) will be scheduled for January 12, 1989 at the Seasons Restaurant. The cities will be invited to join the Watershed District in reviewing the goals for 1989 and the involvement of each of the cities in achieving those goals. The District Engineer was asked to host informational meetings for city engineers on a quarterly basis. The first meeting is to be set up as soon as possible. The Board asked to be kept informed of the meeting schedule so members of the Board and/or staff could attend these meetings if they wished. o A time frame for Board members and staff to attend city councils meetings will be set up. The regular meeting dates for each of the councils is as follows: Blaine - first and third Thursdays of the month Andover - first and third Tuesdays of the month Ham Lake - first and third Mondays of the month Coon Rapids - first, second and fourth Tuesdays of the month Columbus Township - second and fourth Wednesdays of the month Page 5. CClon Creek Watet"shed Distt"ict - Decembet" 12, 198B o Ttle District AdMinistrator stated the assessed value for the payable 1987 ad valorem tax was $269,953,597 with a millrate of .391 for 1987. The assessed value for the payable 1988 ad valoreM tax was $286,746,831 with a Millrate of .341. The BCla.t"d t"eviewed a pet"1'I1it appl ieat ion ft"Orll Stc.ne Construction to build a COMmercial building in the Blaine Industt"ial SqlJat"e Secccnd Additi.::cn. N':J DNR or Co't"ps wetlaYlds appear to be affected. The District Engineer recommended deferring discussion of the application pending receipt of fut"thet" i nfo,,"mat i Oy,. Add i t iona 1 i Ylfclt"mat i Cln Yleeded i nc ludes a pet"l'I1it application, aYI et"Osil:IYI contt"I:11 plan showing silt feYlce elt" hay bale installat ion as speci fied by the Distt"ict Engineet", detail of the silt fence or hay bale installation, detail of the rock filter dam installation, 100-year flood elevation, proposed grading and vegetation schedule and a cash sttt"ety for erclsic1n contt"cll irl the arnourlt of $565.75. The Boat~d t"eviewed a pet~hlit application f,,"om Ulf T. and Ma,'ta Rosi r,g for the approval of the ,'epai r of a stock pond and the t"eplacemerlt of a culvert. Thel'''e is no apparent outlet to Ditch 58. Gary Beck Moved the application be approved as p,'esented by the Dist,'ict Enginee,', seconded by Paul Williams. Motion carried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. The Board reviewed a permit application from Richard Kunsh ie,' fe". a ten lot ,'esident ial development in Ham Lake. Ditch 44 flows southeasterly through the east side of the pt"operty. The District Engineer recohlMended discussion of the applicatioYI be deferred perldiYlg ,,"eceipt Clf further infclt"mation. Additional information needed includes document at ioy, support i r,g the 100-year flclcld elevat ic,n, including the 100-foot easement on either side of the Ditch 44 centerline, a notation on the plans showing the direction of the flow from the ponding area located near the intersect ion of Packa,'d Street ar,d 165th Avenue, detai 1 showiYlg hl:'w low flow will er,tet" Ditch 44 from the road ditches, a map showirlg pt"Clpet"ty boundaries, a schedule cIf e,,"osion control implementation, t"evegetation and COYlst ruct i orl of st Clrrn sewet" i mpt"overnent s, arid the ercs i OY. contl'~ol method to be used dl_tring constrl..tction. The Board reviewed a permit application from the Anoka County-Blaine Airport for the westside watermain. The watermain crosses Ditch 41 and the depth is in accordance with CCWD regulations. Provisions are made for ditch bank erosion correction. Mel Schulte moved the application be approved as out 1 ined by the District Eng inee,', seconded by Gary Beck. Motion carl'''ied with a vote elf five yeas arid no nays. The District Engineer reported the amendments for the Happy Acres pond, the pond at Old Colony Estates and Ditch 60 have been ,'eviewed and wi 11 be ready fe.r the ,neet i ng or, December 27, 1988 with representatives from Anoka County and the cities of Andover and Blaine. Amendments for Ditch 57, Ditch 59 and the holding pond/wet land sto"age area on Ditch 37 are being reviewed. An amendment for Ditch 58 is being prepa,'ed. Bill Weidenbacher presented a list of projected 1989 hourly ,oates for E. A. Hickok & Assoc. Also p,'esented was a proposed agreement between the Coon Creek Watershed District and E.A. Hickok & Assoc., Inc., A Division of James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. The agreement will be reviewed by the Board and Counsel and will be discussed at the December 19, 1988 meeting. o . Page 5. Coon Cl'''eek Watershed District - December 12, 1988 o The District Engineer presented a press release covering the application to the Minnesota P,:.llutic.n Ce'Yltrol Agency's Clean Wate,," Pcu"tne,,"ship Gt"ant Pl'''ogt''am. The B.:.at"d t"'eviewed the following p,,"ess l'"'elease arid at..tthot....ized its subrnissiclYI tel le.eal newspapet"s. The t"elease will be sl.lbmitted by the District Engineer. Press Release The Coon C,'eek Wate,'shed Dist,'ict and the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District have submitted an application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Clean Wate,' Pa,'tr.ership G,'ar.t prog,'arn. This prograrn offer"'s 50 percent cost shat"iYlg fol"" projects concerning the improverllent and/o,," pt"otect iCIY'1 of water qual i ty including lakes, streams, and groundwater. The CCWD Boa,'d of Manage,'s and the Ar.oka SWCD Board of Supervisors submitted an application for a diagnostic/ feasibility project. This diagnostic/feasibility project involves the analysis of ground and slJr"face water" qlJality within the Watershed District resulting in a specific management plan to impr"ove water" q..,ality for the pr"eserlt and protect it fc." the future. The Coe,n C,'eek Watershed District comprises portions of the City of Coon Rapids, Blai ne, Andove,', Ham Lake and Columbus Townshi p. The Minnesota Pollution Contt'ol Agency will announce which projects it irttends to ft..'Ytd for" 1989 in February. The projects proposed by the CCWD and the Anoka SWCD, if funded, will begin in March 1989 and be cornpleted by Ma,'ch 1991. For further inforrnation, contact Patricia Rudolph at the Anoka County SWCD at 575-4221, Bill Weidenbacher, from E.A. Hickok & Assoc., reported on the engineer's meeting held as part of the annlJal meeting of the Metro Association of Watershed Districts. The Board reviewed resolution 88-22 - Resolution supporting Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District's proposal to study the quality of surface water and ground water in the Coon Creek Watershed District. Gary Beck rnoved Resolution 88-22 be adopted to include rnore specific lar.guage ,'equested by the Ar.oka County Soi 1 and Wate,' Conservation District and Resolution 88-19 be rescinded. Motion seconded by Willis Peterson. Motion carried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. 88-22 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ANOKA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT'S PROPOSAL TO STUDY THE QUALITY OF SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER IN THE COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RESOLUTION Mr. Beck offered the following resolution and moved its adoption. o WHEREAS, the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District is proposing to sponsor a grant application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for funds rnade available through the Clean Water Partnership Prograrn; and WHEREAS, the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District is proposing to study surface water quality of Coon Creek and groundwater quality in both urban and rural portions of the Watershed District; and Page 7. CCICln C.....eek Watet''''shed District - December 12., 1988 . WHEREAS, the Clean Water Partnership Proqram provides grants ror 50~ of the cost for local projects involving water quality iMpacts of nonpoint sources of pollution; and o WHEREAS., the remaining 50% of the cost will come from local sources including the Watershed District, Anoka County and the Soil and Water CClnset''''vaticcn Dist.....ict, with the Watet"shed Distt~ict' s share being $10,000 pet'" yeat'" fOt~ the two yeat's beginning in 1989; and WHEREAS, the Coon Cr'eek Watershed Distr'ict ay,d the Anoka County Se.il and Water' COYlser'vation District wish to implemeYlt actions to protect and restore the water' quality of the Coon Creek Watershed District, they agree to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement upon notice of grant funding; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District supports the proposed study sponsored by the Anoka Soil and Water Conservation Distt"ict and agrees to provide its share of financial support pending approval of the grant application by the Pollution Control Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Coon Creek Watershed District that it hereby designates Patricia Rudolph of the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation Distr'ict as the Project Representative for the proposed Clean Watel''' Pal'...tYlet"ship Phase 1 -- Prclject Development Gr'ant. The Project Representative shall have the authority to represent the Coon Cr'eek Water'shed District and the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District in all matters that do not specifically require action by the Watershed District Board of Managers of the Conservation District Board of Commissioners. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCAl shall dir-ect Clean Water' Par'ty,er'ship Application cOt"respondence and Clean Water Pat"tnership Pt"o.ject COt..t"espondeYlce tel the Prclject Rept"eseYltat i ve aYld shall consider" correspondence from and action on the part of the Project Representative as representations and actions taken by the Coon Cr'eek Water'shed Distr'ict Boar'd e.f ~lanagers and Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District Board of Commissioners. The motion was seconded by Mr. Peterson. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and the roll being called, there were five yeas and no nays as follows. Schcllte, yea Peterscln, yea Beck, yea Slyzuk, yea Wi 11 iams, yea and so the resolution was adopted. Paul M. Williams Secretary The Board discussed the need for name tags and calling cards and decided calling cards were not necessary. The District Administrator was instructed to order pocket name tags. The meeting adjourned at 9.25 p.m. on Slyzuk, seconded by Willis Peterson, vote of five yeas and no nays. a melt i OYI by Ken Motion carried with a o COON CREEI< WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING DECEMBER 19, 1988 o The B.::.at"'d Clf Managet"s of the Coorl Ct"eek Watet"'shed Distt"'ict held their regular meeting on December 19, 1988 at the Bunker Hills Activities Center. Others: Mel Schulte, Willis Peterson, Gary Beck, Ken Sly~uk, Paul Williams Michelle Ulrich, Ed Matthiesen, Dale Claridge, Al Sannerud, TOM Johnson, Marilyn Nysetvold Pt"eser,t : Chairman Schulte opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. and asked for additions to the agenda. Gary Beck moved the agenda be appt"c.ved as pl'"'esented, secoYlded by Ken Slyz'_,k. Mot tOYI cart"ied with a vote of five yeas and no nays. No one asked to speak during the open mike period. Minutes from the December 12, 1988 special meeting were reviewed. Paul Williams moved the minutes be approved with the following changes. Sentence two, paragraph seven, page c'Yle ShOI.lId read IIBecause it isn't practical to levy on all ditches for the year pay '90, staff recommends redetermining benefits on Ditches 57, 58 and 59 and levying up to $40,000 on Ditches 57 and 59 for pay '90 in order to reduce the deficits." Paragraph rdne on page orle should t"'ead as follows: "Staff t"'ecomr'ley,ded the Watet"shed Distl'''ict 'llove forward on Ditches 57 and 59 as soon as possible using Minnesota Statutes chapter 473 as the method of improvement and chapter 1061'1 as the method used for redetermining benefits," Motion seconded by Ken Slyzuk. Motion carried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. Tom Johnson, with A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., presented estimated costs to redetermine benefits on Ditches 57, 58 and 59. The majority of the cost involves proofing the benefit list against the drainage area and the preparation, mailing and publication of notices. Paul WilliaMS suggested researching whether the county could merge the name and benefit amount on a for", letter designed to fit a window envelope. Counsel was asked to research the necessity of publishing the complete list of p,"ope,"ty owners, P. I. N. numbers, etc. in the Ylewspape1'''' 01''' whether a simple notice of the hearing was sufficient. The complete process will be reviewed with Counsel before any action is taken. Paul Williams questioned the need to redetermine benefits. M,". Johrlson e><plai ned that the gene,"al f'Jnd had borrowed ",or.ey to ditch systems and needed to recover those funds. Gary Beck ,.oved the ce,"tificate of deposit in the amount of $64,798, designated for Ditch 57 be tt"ansferred into the general fund to offset Ditch 57 e><pense advanced by the general fund. Commissioner Natalie Haas Steffen addressed the Board and encouraged them to review with the State Audit~r the possibility of reversing expenses so they become the obligation of the general fund, not the ditch where the expenses were originally incurred. She also addressed including all of the previously incur,oed costs in a project done under chapter 473. Counsel was asked to contact Pam McCabe from the County Attorney's office to further discuss these Matters. o Page 2. Coon Creek Watershed District - December 19, 1988 o The Boa.,"d discussed b..,dget dOC1Jfllsnt sl i nformat ion C\l"td asked for a breakdown according to the items listed in the adr'linistl'''ative budget with monthly l'''eports c,n the amcluY',t spent to date, the amount remaining and the variance. Budgets will be prepared by the District Engineer, the District Attorney and the District Administrator. Budget i nformat ion wi 11 be prepared fol''' the Januat"Y 9, 1989 Bc.ard of Managers meeting. The Board reviewed three possible invitations to the January 12th dinner meeting and selected the letterhead draft prepa.'ed by Paul Williams. The Dist.'ict Admiylistrato.' informed the Board that all five municipalities had been contacted regarding the dinner. Those invited froM the municipalities will be the elected officials and key staff membet"s. Also invited will be CC1unty COfllmissic1rlers and those who have agt"eed to set"ve on the advisc.ry committee. Additior.al r.ames r'lay be added to the invitation list. The Boa.-d reviewed Resolution 88-23, the Resolution t'o rescind Resolution 88-5 and Resolution 88-19. Both .,"esolut ions had previously been wi thdrawn, blJt needed a fCI,"rnal resolllt iCln tCI resciYld them. Gary Beck rnclved the .'esc,lut ion be adopted, seconded by Paul Wi 11 iams. Mot ion carried with a vote of five yeas and no nays~ 88-23 RESOLUTION TO RESCIND RESOLUTIONS 88-5 AND 88-19 RESOLUTION M.,. Beck offered the following .'esolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS Resolution 88-5, Resolution to petition for increase in Board members was adopted by the Coon Creek Watershed District Boa.'d of Managers on May 23, 1988; and WHEREAS Resolution 88-5 was again discussed on May 31, 1988 and June 13, 1388 with Gary Beck making a motion to withdraw Resolution 88-5, seconded by Ken Slyzuk; and WHEREAS Resc.l ut iC'YI 88-13 was adopted by the CC'C'Y' C.'eek Watershed Dist.'ict Board of Managers on November 21, 1388; and WHEREAS a motion was made by Gary Beck on December 12, 1388 to rescind Resolution 88-13 and adopt Resolution 88-22 which iy,cludes specific lay,guage prescribed by the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District, seconded by Willis Petersc.n, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolutions 88-5 and 88- 19 be rescinded. The motion was seconded by Mr. Williams. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and the roll being called, there were five yeas and no nays as follows: Schul te, yea Peterson, yea Beck, yea Slyzuk, yea Williams, yea o and so the resolution Was adopted. Paul M. Williams Secretary A Page 3. Coon Creek Watershed District - December 19, 1988 o The Bc.at"d t"eviewed the bi lIs tel be paid. Gat"Y Beck moved the bills fo.... paymerlt be appt"oved as p.....eseYlted, seconded by Willis Petet"son. MClt.ic.n cal''')'''ied with a vote of five yeas and no nays. The bills to be paid are as follows: Minnesota State Auditor $ A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. Acct./Adm. - Genel'''al Fund A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. - P.'ojects A. M. Sanne.'ud & Assoc., P. A. - MSA 509 811. 62 1,414.75 Acct. IAdm. 798.65 Acct. IAdm. 227.50 The District Engineer, Ed Matthiesen, reported on the diffe.'ences in the three p.'ofiles done on Ditch 41, Mr. Matthiesen found the Blaine study and the Flood Insurance Study to both be o,..tdated. The st'Jdy done by Israelse,y" Reese, Ellingson & Assoc. in 1988 should be reviewed by the DNR fol" a floc.d iYlslU'''aYICe stl.tdy update. Cl.l....l'..ent elevatic.ns are based C1Y, c.utdat ed at ud i es, but r'lf.lst st i 11 be met when pt"ojects at"e done. Nr. Matthieserl will have a nlot""e c.:;,rnp.."ehensive plarl clf what rleeds to be done irl the Blairle area developed towa.-ds the end of Janua.'y. Dale Claridge, from E.A. Hickok & Assoc., gave a p.."esentation on the condition of arid past improvements to the Ditch 60 drainage system. There are no apparent serious floc,ding 0.." hyd..""aulic pt"c.blerl1s. There a.."e some mirlor pre,bleros with channel bay,ks. M.,. Cla.'idge reported the overall conditi9n of the s~sten1 was relatively good. He suggested the Boa.."d .."'econslder the Yleed to recc.nstruct the ditch and recommended that two sections of the roain stem be cleay,ed and widened to imp.'ove the hyd.'aul ic capacity. The Boa.'d decided not to p.-oceed wi th the reconst>'uct ion of Ditch 60 at this time. The Dist.-ict EngiYleer reported that plans for the Happy Acres pond were being drawn up. The District Engineer is waiting fo.' plans frc,m TKDA on how grading will be incorporated at the Old Colony Estates site. Discussion of the contract with E.A. Hickok and Assoc. was defen-ed unt i I the January 9, 1989 Board of Manage.'s meet i ng. The District Engineer reviewed the December 19, 1988 meeting with staff froro the City of Blaine. A staff recommendation will be prepared fc,.' the Jay,uary 9, 1'388 ,"eeting. It was suggested that a written request or written CCIYICtU"reru::e frc,rn affected munici pal it ies be c.btairled befo.."e fll>'the.' costs a.-e incurred for any project direct ly involving the municipalities. Couy,sel repo.'ted the .'eply brief .'egarding the Holasek appea 1 had beer, f i I ed arId WOlt 1 d be served orl December 20, 1988. No oral arguments will be presented. The meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m. on a motion by Willis Peterson, seconded by Gary Beck. Mot ion ca.'ried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. o COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING JANUARY 9, 1989 o The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held their regular meeting on January 9, 1989 at the Bunker Hills Activities Center. Others. Mel Schulte, Willis Pete,,"son, Gat"Y Beck, Kerl SIyzuk, Paul Williams Harold Sheff, Ed Matthiesen, Al Sannerud, TOM Johnson, Marilyn Nysetvold, Corwin Bradford Pt"'esent : ChairMan Schulte opened the Meeting at 7:00 p.M. and asked for additions to the agenda. IteM 4.P. (1) Designation of newspaper for 1989 was added. Willis Peterson Moved the agenda be app,-oved as p,'eser,ted wi th the stated add i t ior" seconded by PattI Wi 11 iams. Mot ion carried with a velte of five yeas and no nays. No one asked to speak during the open mike period. Minutes from the DeceMber 13, 1388 regular Meeting were reviewed. Paul Wi 11 iams moved the minutes be apPl'''oved as pl'''eseYlted, seconded by Wi 11 is Petel''''son. Mot ion carried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. Tor., Johnson with A.M, Sannerud & Assoc. distributed the a'oldit report for years er,ding December 31, 1386 and 1387. Mr. Johnson eMplained the organization of the report and the format of the financial statements. R special meeting to t'eview the a'Jdit t'eport was scheduled fo,' Thl,,'sday, January 13, 1383 at 7: 00 p. 10. The District Administrator reported that eight people have agreed to serve on the advisory committee. The ninth member wi 11 rep,'esent the Anc.ka County Board of COlOmissioners. The COl..lnty Boa...'d has been asked to appoi Y,t a represent at i ve. The District Administrator stated the preliminary draft of the pr'ocess to t"edetermine beYlefits was an internal dClcument dist,-ibuted for the Board's information. A viewer must be appointed to replace Malcolm Allen, who recently passed away. Staff suggested asking Malcolm Watson and Doris It"vine to conduct pl'''elirainary intet"views with qualified appt"aiser's and make a t"ecclfl1mendaticln to the Board. Mr. Watson and Ms. It'vine will be asked to p,-esent two applicants for the Board to interview at the January 23, 1383 Boa,'d meet i ng. Discussion and adoption of Resolution 89-1, Resolution appointing viewers for Ditches 57 and 53, was deferred until a third viewer could be selected. Discussion and adoption of Resolution 89-2, Resolution appointing viewers for Ditch S8, was also deferred until a third viewer could be selected. Resolution 89-3, Resolution to rescind Resolution 88-1, Resolution 88-3 and Resolution 88-4 pertaining to the t"edetet"miYlaticln of benefits felY' Ditch 57, was reviewed. Gary Beck moved Resolution 83-3 be adopted, seconded by Ken Slyzuk. Motion "a,'ried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. o Page 2. Coc'n C,'eek Watershed Dist,'ict - January 9, 1989 89-3 o RESOLUTION TO RESCIND RESOLUTION 8B-I, RESOLUTION BB-3 AND RESOLUTION 88-4 PERTAINING TO THE REDETER~lINATION OF BENEFITS FOR DITCH 57 RESOLUTION l'tb.... Beck Qffet"ed the fc,llc.wiYlg t"esolution and moved its adc.pt ion: WHEREAS the Cc.on Creek Wate,'shed District Boc,,'d of Managers adc,pted Resolution 88-1, Resolution to the viewet"s report on the new redetet"'miYlation of beYlefits fClt" Ditch 57 Cln Mat"ch 28, 19BB and Resolution BB-l outlined a formula which will nett be used for the redetermiYlatioYI clf beYlefits to be dOYle in 1989, and WHEREAS the Coc.n C,'eek Wate,'shed District Bc,ard of Managers adopted Resolution 88-3, Resolution and ot"det" fClt" a redete,,"minat iOYI of beYlefi ts fo,," AYloJ(a COUY,ty Ditch NCt. 57 and appointment of viewers the""efl~t", on April 11, 198a arid the t"edeterrniYlatioYI of benefits did nClt proceed at that time and viewers will be reappointed to redetermine benefits, and WHEREAS the Coon Creek Watershed District Board of Managers adopted Resolution 8B-4, Appointment of viewers, on April 11, 1'38a, aYld the appointmeYlt is to be cOYlsidered vcdd, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution BB-l, Resolution 88-3 and Resolution B8-4 be rescinded. The motion was seconded by Mr. Slyzuk. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and the "011 being called, there we,'e five yeas and no nays as follows: SCh'oll te, yea Peterson, yea Beck, yea SlyzIJk., yea Wi II iams, yea and so the resolution was adopted. Paul M. Williams Secretary Tom Johnson presented a proposed monthly budget report listing total expenses for the current month, total expenses fo,' the yea,'-to-date and the year-to-date budgeted amount. Budgeted figllt'es al'e included fo,' the general fllYld, insttt"ance, planning undet" MS 473, aYld genet"sl legal, adrlliy,istt"ative and engineering expeYlses felr each of the ditch maintenance funds. The Boa,'d asked that a b,'ief nat"t"ative accctrtlpany the mOY'lthly t"eport stating the nature of the expenses. o The District Administrator addressed the question of whether the general fund could pay ditch expenses. The State Auditor recommends the ditches pay their own expense. Obtaining an official opinion from the attorney in the State Auditor's office would cost approximately $400.00. The State Auditor's office suggested the District obtain an opinion from the State Attorney General if the District was considering paying ditch expense from the general fund. An Attorney General's opinion could also affect other governmental agencies. Page 3. Coon Creek Watershed Dist~'ict - January 9, 1983 o Ken Slyzuk asked about the possibility of getting legislative support for the Coon C~'eek Watershed District to set up speCial taMing districts and use an ad valorem tax to ~'ec':lve~" thclse furlds advanced by the genet"al fund. The District Administrator reported on his Jan. 9th meeting with Senator Greg Dahl. Tfle District Administrator (jiscussed with Senator Dahl the problems the District was having because of complicated legislation. The Board authorized the District Administrator to contact the Board of Water and Soil Resources and others to gain support for ttle District. Willis Peterson moved the District Administrator be given a budget of $1,000.00 to obtain infclrrrla.tion .:)n special legislatir:.n, secclnded by Paul WilliaMS. Motion carried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. The Board also discussed the possibility of including pt"evi.::-usly incut"t'ed costs uY'ldet" a project done accot'ding to Minn. Statute chapter 473. Harold Sheff presented an c.pinion that orlly p,,"eviol..ls expense fot' studies, plans, etc. that would be used for a p,,"clject uYldet" MS 473 cCII.tld be included in the tCltal pt'o.ject cost. If rlO relatic1nship eHists between past eHperlse arId the 473 p.'oject, that expense cannot be included in the total 473 project cost and would have to be recovered under 1('GA. Where the cost of redetermining benefits for a specific ditch systern is greater thaYI the amount 1:lwed to the genet"al fund, the Board may want to consider levying an assessment against the original benefited area. The Dist.'ict Enginee.' repo.'ted that he was workirlg with WClodlaY,d Develc.pment to meet pondiYlg mitigation t"equirements for the COt'pS crf Engineers. He asked whethet" the easement for that pond should be dedicated to the City of Andover or to the Watershed District. After discussion, the Board refet't"ed the subject to ColtYlsel for a t'espc'YISe at the Ylext ,,'egula,," meeting. The District Administrator called the Board's attention to the notes ft'om the Decembe,," 27, 1988 infclt'frlation meetirlg with t"epresentatives frOM Anoka Courlty, Andc1ver, Blair-Ie, the Watershed District and Mel Sinn from the Board of Water and 81:li I Resources. Ari1eYldments fClt" Ditch 60, Happy A~res PCIYld and the pC1nd in Old Coll::-ny Estates Wet"e reviewed. Financing of the t"egional pc.nding pt'clgram was discussed and a meeting of l'''epresentatives ft"C"ll Arloka. COl.tnty arid the five municipalities will be held to discuss the distribution of costs involved in the Capital Improvement Program. The District Administrator reported that 43 of the people who had responded to date would be attending the dinner meeting on January 12, 1989. The District Administrator reported that he had received a reql..lest ft"oM the City of Andovet' fClt" a ri1eetiYfg on JaYluary 5, 1'38'3. That meeting was postponed pendirlg the Dist.'ict's .'eceipt of a w.'itter. statement from the City of Andc'ver pertaining to a redetermination of benefits on Ditch 57. o M,'. Beck moved the staff fc',' the Coc'n Creek Watershed District be designated as follows for 1'38'3, EY'lgirleer - Ed MatthieseYI, E.A. Hich.ok & Assoc. Counsel - Harold Sheff, Olson, Gunn & Seran, Ltd. Admi Yristratot" - Al Sanrlerud, A. M. Sanrlerud & Assoc., P.I'!. Motion seconded by Mr. Slyzuk. Motion carried with a vote of five yeas and no nays. Page 4. Coon Creek Watershed District - January 9, 1989 o Mr. Sctlulte Moved the First Bank Coon Rapids be designated as the depcts i t.:'ry fot.. the Celon Ct"'eek Water'shed Di strict fell'''' 1 '389. l"1ot i.=.y. seconded by f'lh"'. Petet"'sc'YI. Mot ie.n cat"l'''ied wi th a vote of five yeas and no nays. Mr. Slyzl.d< r.,.:aved the Anc,ka COl.tnty Urdc.n & Shopper"', Irlc. (Anclka Urlic,)"J and CO':IYl Rapids Het"'ald) and the Blaine COMMunity Press be desiqnated as tt,e newspapers where legal notices pertaining to the Coon Creek Watershed District will be published. Motion seconded by Mr. Beck. Motion carried with a vote of five yeas arid ""0 Ylays. The Bc,at"d rev iewed i nfot"mat ion abclut The Compt"ehens i ve Water ReSCll.tt"ces Pt"otection Act of 19B9, t"eceived from the Board of Water and Seil Resources. The Board reviewed the memo from Al Dornfeld regarding the annual meeting of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Distt"icts, Inc. OYI December 3, 1989. The Distt'ict Administt-ator called the Bc,a,-d's attentie,n to the DNfl perr"it applications ar,d stated they we,-e listed fe,r information only. The Board reviewed the bi lIs to be paid, Wi 11 is Peterson moved the bi lIs f,:,,- payment be approved as presented, secoYlded by Gat"Y Beck.. Motion cat"t"ied with a vote of five yeas and no r,ays. The bi lIs to be paid a'-e as follows: The Starllp Pad Cf,:.mpany, IYlc. $ 50.04 Mick's Printing - Office Supplies 237.50 E.A. Hickok & Assoc. - Engineering 360.73 A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. Acct./Adm. 4,859.32 - Gerle,,"al Furld A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. Acct./AdM. 1,512.60 - Projects A.M. Sannerud & Assoc., P.A. Acct./AdM. 632.53 - MSA 509 Ted Tronscln was reissued a check to ,,"eplace check #2645, issued August 24, 1987 in the amount of S324.00 for ttle mowing of ditch banks. The BClat"d reviewed a permit application from Anda Construction for Blaine Apartments at University Ave. & 118th Ave. NE. The District Engir,ee,- ,'ece,m,.ended defer,-ir,g discussion of the application until the following information is received: a map showing the location of Ditch 41 along the er,tire southe,-n p,'ope,-ty bounda,-y to vet"ify the 100-foCft easement, an erosic1n and sediment control plan, a plan for a I-year ponding program with baffle f,-or. paved slit-faces fc.,- water quality and sedimerlt cent t"':, 1 and a cash su.."ety of $3,225.00. Wi 11 is Petet"son moved Anda Construction be given a provisional permit to begin construction of the most southeast apartment building. The District Engineer will review the grading and dt.ainage plan and ttle Board will review the application and t"'ecorlUl1endat ions at the JaYllIary 23t"d meet ing. Melt iefTI seconded by Mel Schulte. Motion car'l'''ied with a votel:=tf three yeas ar,d twe, r,ays. (Gary Beck arod Paul Wi 11 iaros were opposed to granting a provisional permit.) o The Board reviewed a permit application for Savage Pines, a commercial site draining to Ditch 41. Gary Beck moved the applicatioYI be appt"oved as ol..ltlirled iYI the enginee'r"t s t"epc1t"t. Mot ic.n secoYlded by Ken Slyzuk. Mot ion car'r"ied with a velte of five yeas and no nays. ATI et"osion control plaYI and schedule of site restoration Must be received along with a completed perMit application. A cash surety is required in the amount of $670.00. Page 5. COCtn Ct"'eek Watershed Distt"'ict - Janttat...y 9, 1989 o "The District Engineer gave an inspection repot...t on Bent Creek Estates. Silt fence has been placed correctly. There is no evidence of vegetation. Mt.... Matthiesen recommended the project be re-inspected in the spring. The District Engineer gave an inspection report on Rod Tauer CI:trlstt...ltcticlrl. The silt fence was installed by Jarluary 9, 1989. The District Engirleet.. gave an irlspection repClt...t Clr, the Minnesota Intrastate Transmission SysteMS natural gas pipelirle pt"oject. NCt vegetation was evident at any of the six sites. Mt... Matthiesen r"'ecomrllended the sites be re- inspected in the spring. The District Engineer gave an inspection report on the Nat ional Spt:lt...ts Center'" (Enebak Construct ior,). He O'Jt lined pl''''clblems relating to weit..s that had been cClnstr1.lcted. John Rodeberg has been contacted to have the probleMs corrected. The Distt"'ict Engineer pt"'eserlted pt"'oposed rule revisions. He t"'ecorl1r'lended i rlct"'easi rig the cash sut"'ety t..=t a base of $500.00 plus $100/act"'e plus $7.50 pet.. lirleal foclt fCll''' the mairl ditch and $5.00 pel''' lirleal f,;:tot fer the branch ditches. He alscl proposed projects having a miniMum of 2.0 acres of paved al'''ea be requit"ed te implement water ql.\ality pending fe.." the one-year event. The District Engineer will notify each of the cities in the District of the proposed revisions and moni te.t.. the necessa.."y follc.w up. The District Engiy,ee,' gave an 'Jpdate on the Olympic Stadicorn pond. He reCOMMended construction of the pond on the east side of Highway 65. The Board asked him to SUMmarize the benefits and probleMS with construction on the East side of Highway 65 and construction in Cerltl'''al Avenue Acres cln the West side of Hi ghway 65. The 5Ltmmal''''y wi 11 be preserlted at the J ant.1ary 23t"d meet i ng. The District Engineer presented budgeting and schedule infol''''rllation oy, the engineering administt"'ative budget, ger,et"'al ditch engirleel''''ing arid the Capital Impl'''overnerlt Pt"'ogl''''arll (473). He suggested tJ1e Board r"'eview the Pl''''c'posed format after working with it for a month or two. The District Administrator will forward copies of the engineering budgets to the Board members. The Distt"ict Engineer submitted a proposal to pl''''epal''''e an inspection ,'epc.,'t oy, Ditch 3'3. Paul Williams will coy,tact the city of Blaine for their reaction. Nothing further will be done until a for"mal t"equest is t"eceived fl''''OM the City of Blaine. The District Engineer presented a topic outline on ponding ir"plementat ion fo,' the January 12, 198'3 d i nne,' r.eet i ng. The District Engineet" pt"'eserlted a SUflUoat..y clf a lettel'''' fl''''orn Mel Sinn, BWSR, to the Metropolitan Drainage Law Review Parle!. The parlel met Clr, Jar,uary 9, 1989 tel discuss whether 509 is a viable alternative to l06A. o The Distl''''ict Engineer introduced discussion of the contract with E.A. Hickok & Assoc" Inc., A Division of JaMes M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. The last sentence of paragraph 3.2 of Article 3 on Page 5, Authorization of Services, shall read as follows: "In the abserlce clf specific contra,'y designat ions, CONSULTANT may ass'o,me the Board P,'esidey,t shall be so autho,'ized, aYld this Ag,-eeMent shall c:onstitl.\te the requil'''ed written designation. It Page (;, Coon C.'eek Wate.'shed Dist.'ict - Jar.llary 9, 1989 o Paragraph 4.2 of Article 4, Billing Rates, on Page 5, shall read as follclws: "The tet"Jl1 Billing Rates as used hel'''eirl shall mean the hourly rates as shown on Exhibit 11111 attached hereto and Made a part hereof including but not limited to principals, engineers, draftsmen, and clerks'l. Pal.!l Wi 11 lams f'lclved the Coy.t,,"act changes, seconded by Ken Sly~uk. of five yeas and no nays. be signed with the stated Motion passed with a vote The meeting adjourned at If):33 p.m. on Schulte, seconded by Willis Peterson. vote of five yeas and no nays. a motion by Mel Motion carried with a o COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOAFlD OF MANAGERS' SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 19, 1989 o The Boat-"'d of Manager"'s of the Coon Ct"eek Watet"shed Distr"ict held a special Meeting on January 19, 1989 to review the audit report for the years ending December 31, 1986 and 1987. The Meetinq was held at the Bunker Hills Activities Cey.ter". Preser-It : Mel Schulte, Gary Beck 17:10 p.M. >, Ken Slyzuk, Paul Williartls Willis Peterson COut of town) Michelle Ulr"ich, Tom Jc.hnsoYI, f'11cu"ilyn Nysetvold Absent: Othe,"s: ChairMan Schulte opened the meeting at 7:05 p.M. and turned the rl1eet lng ovel""" to Tom JClhnson ft"om A. M. Sannet"'Jd & Assoc. M.,..... Jc.hnsorl cC1ndl.1cted a detailed review ,:,f the audit t"'epot"t arid explained the changes i rl pt"esentat ion wh ich c,:)t"respond tel govet"'nrller,taI accouYlting. He also stated that an unqualified opinion was the highest rating an audit could receive and Meant that the financial statements accurately reflected the position of the District. When cash accounts have been consolidated the District will cc.ntact some of the at"'ea banks fot'" the best interest rates on certificates of deposit. The Board discussed the certificate of deposit Mentioned on page 42 of the report. A local business escrowed money in a CD fa>' the relocat ion of a pe,,'t ie,n of Ditch 39. The audit t"epo,,"t states the pt",,:)ject did nc.t oecut... The t"eport should be corrected to state that the project did occur. The District Engineer will be asked to inspect the project and, upon approval, the funds will be returned to the local business. Ga,,"y Beck requested a bt"eakdowYI clf the contt"actltal services. The Meeting adjourned at seconded by Mel Schulte. yeas and no nays. 9:15 p.m. on a Motion by Gary Beck, MClticlYI ca""'t"'ied with a vote I~f fout" o /.:> c.C . OA/Uf '0/?9 TD j::.~, ~8f LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES, INC. o 7501 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 612/546.1470 .--- "~ EC t"iV E=fl Hr;~:~lU CITY OF ANDOVER January 30, 1989 Mr. Lawrence M. Business Agent Teamsters Local 3001 University Minneapolis, MN Bastian No. 320 Ave. S.E. 55414 RE: YOUR ATTACHMENT TO PETITION TO STATE OF MINNESOTA BUREAU OF MEDIATION SERVICES Dear Mr. Bastian: Your attachment to your petition for mediation between your Union and the City of Andover warrants a reply for the following reasons: 1. Your Union has repeatedly agreed to the contract language in the Metropolitan Area Management Association (MAMA) and Local 49 labor agreement. See, for example your agreement for public works employees in North St. Paul and West St. Paul. The use, therefore, of this contract as a format is consis- tent with your own repeated past agreements. 2.. The City did not refuse to negotiate with regard to the subject of drug testing. The City, rather, stated that it would not agree to place a provision on this subject in the City of Andover agreement. Since virtually none of the other Stanton Group V cities have such provisions, the City of Andover's position on this issue is quite consistent with common practice. Interestingly, I note that your recently negotiated contracts with cities do not contain such a provision. The City of Andover will be willing to agree to the commonly used contract language which protects the City's right to manage its personnel, to pay competative wages and~~to grant fringe benefits equal to those given by the City to the other City of Andover employees. The City of Andover will not be intimidated, however, by inflammatory and inaccurate letters written as "Attachment(s)" to petitions for mediation. Sincerely, o C. F. Smythe Consultant to the City of Andover CFS/gw cc: James E. Schrantz, City Administrator ~ Paul Goldberg, Commissioner, BMS ~ . . "KDA TOL TZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIA TES. INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.' 893 612/292-4400 FAX 612/292-0083 January 18,1989 U"''''-' E "'T-E~,r:'" ;.;-;-,,',--:~~. L tOl V~~ ~ ~ F;91~~U CITY OF ANDOVER Honorable Mayor and City CouncIl Andover, Minnesota Re: Andover, Minnesota CommIssion No. 9150-989 "'-' Dear Mayor and Council: The fol lowIng Is confirmation of engineering matters discussed at the regular City Councll Meeting held at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, January 17, 1989: 1. Ordinance 10 Amendment The PlannIng and Zoning Commission was notified by City staff that culs-de-sac In the municipal utility area of Andover have been constructed to a standard of 46.5' radius roadway, as compared to 50' as noted In the ordinances. They sent the Item to the Council for rev lew. Public Works and FI re Departments have stated that they woul d like the larger radius to be the standard. Mr. Rodeberg had previously submitted a letter to the PlannIng and Zoning Commission noting that the 46.5' radius comes from maintaining a 13.5' boulevard as In the typical urban street section. He stated that the 13.5' Is required to allow all burled utilIty cable and gas 1108$ to be properly located within the boulevard. A reduction of the boulevard width will not allow room for all utilities, and would require some burled utilities being placed outside of the rlght-of-\"IcY, Mr. Rodeberg presented material noting standard cul-de-sac dimensions In the metropolitan area. He noted that the majorIty of cIties had paved radii of 45 to46.5'. The cities utilizing larger radIus cul-de- sac generally required some burled utilities (electric, telephone or TV) outside of the right-of-way In a separate 10' utilIty easement along the front of the lot. He also presented standard design Information noting MTC and MnDOT design criterIa. He noted that the City EngineerIng Department has revIewed the 46.5' standard, with a consistent 13.5' boulevard, several times In the past, and approve:' Its use. o Mayor Elling stated that a reduced boul evard width woul d make It hard accommodate al I utilities and al low for accurate locating, sInce al I the utilities give off a similar signal with a locator. He stated that 13.5' boulevard Is reasonable. There was some discussion whether to Increase the right-of-way width to 63.5' and keep the 50' radius ordinance requirement, or to keep the 60' right-of-way and decrease the req u I red paved area to 46.5' . .. o Honorabl e Mayor and City Council Andover, Minnesota January 18, 1989 Page 2 Council Action The CIty Council requested that the CIty staff revise Ordinance 10 to note a standard of 46.5' radius cul-de-sac within the urban service area. 2. Annua I Trunk Source and Storage Charge Rev Isl ons The Council approved the fol lowing trunk source and storage charge revisions for 1989: t... Water Trunk Area Connection $914.00/acre (Previously was $900.00) $990.00/R.E.U. (Previously was $970.00) Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Connection $858.00/acre (Previously was $842.00) $221.70/R.E.U. (Previously was $211.15) 3. Final Payments 87-21 87-27 88-6 88-11 88-13 88-19 Oak Bluff 2nd Addition, S.J. Louis Construction Woodland Creek, S.J. Louis Construction Kensington Estates 3rd Addition, Nodland Construction Hidden Creek East, Lake Area Utility Creekhaven, American Contracting Woodland Creek 2nd Addition Paving, W.B. MIller, Inc. The above referenced projects were presented for final payments with the I Imitations as stated In the attached letters. Contractor shal I escrow amount to cover punchllst work before final payment Is made. Escrow shal I be released when al I correction work Is completed and the Publ J c Works and Engl neerl ng Departments have sl gned a rei ease. Council Action The City Council approved the final payments. Being no further engineerIng matters to be discussed, the Engineer was excused at approximately 11:00 PM. o J PR :adh o COON CREEK WATERS Bunker Hills Activities Cente 550 NW Bunker Lake Blvd, Anoka, Minnesota 55304 January 11, 1989 Mr. Jim Schrantz City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, Minnesota 55304 RE: Proposed rule revisions for permits Dear Mr. Schrantz: The Coon Creek Watershed District is proposing two changes to the permitting system. They are: 1. Increasing the required cash surety from a formula of $500 + $50/acre + $5/L.F. for property abutting the main channel + $2.50/L.F. for property abutting a branch ditch to $500 + $100/acre + $7.50/L.F. on main channel + $5/L.F. for a branch ditch. The Board of Managers feels this more accurately reflects actual costs plus an incentive for the permit holder to do their own work. 2. Commercial, industrial and high density residential with paved surfaces greater than 2.0 acres will be required to have one year rate control with a baffle weir for water quality control. Please respond within 45 days with your comments to: Ed Matthiesen JMM/E. A. Hickok and Associates 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, MN 55391 Sincerely, o JMM/E. A. Hickok and Associates Engineers for the District c;f/ll tCCt/~~-y'- Ed Matthiesen, P.E. bt . ~ I o " /D Des 1/2..'1-('7'1 cc 0;117 minnesota department of health 717 s.e. del aware st. p.o. box 9441 minneapolis 55440 (612) 623.5000 MEMORANDUM DATE January 20, 1989 TO City Council/Town Board/Rural Water Supply/System Operator FROM Gary L. Englund, P.E.; Chief l~~. Section of Water Supply 7\ ~ and Engineering SUBJECT: Report to the 1989 Legislature, Proposals for Alternative Funding for Water Supply Monitorina and Surveillance in Minnesota By way of this notice, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) wants to alert you to proposals that will be considered by the 1989 Legislature on funding for public water supply monitoring. As the owner and/or operator of a pub- lic water supply system you will be directly affected by the outcome of the Leqislature's deliberations in this matter. The following is a brief sum- mary of the report including the costs that will be incurred by public water supplies as a result of the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) amendments and the funding alternatives submitted to the Legislature by MDH to cover these costs. As the state agency responsible for protecting and monitoring public drinking water supplies in Minnesota, the MDH submitted a request to the 1988 Legisla- ture for support of a significantly expanded program, which included funding for 15 new positions and support for laboratory services. The funding request was based on I} the need to provide greatly expanded monitoring of public water supplies due to the concern for the occurrence of many man-made chemi- cals in drinking water and 2} the federal 1986 SDWA amendments that require public water supplies to greatly expand the monitoring performed on their drinking water. The 1988 Legislature directed the MDH to report back to it prior to the 1989 session with proposals for funding the drinking water pro- gram in the future. Backaround There are 12,000 public water supply systems in Minnesota divided into three categories: community (l,OOO), nontransient noncommunity (1,665), and noncom- munity (9,305) systems. The noncommunity systems require minimal testing. However, community (such as yours) and nontransient noncommunity systems will be required to test for 83 contaminants compared to the 22 presently monitored. MDH has estimated that the annual avera e cost to each community and nontransient noncommunity water system will be 830, with some systems incurring annual costs of up to $3,500 because of the highly variable monitor- ing frequencies. To fully fund the MDH drinking water program, including the an equal opportunity employer o City Council/Town Board/ -2- Rural Water Supply/System Operator January 20, 1989 cost of all required water analyses, requires approximately $3 million per year. The funding options for the drinking water program contained in the report are as follows: 1. General Fund. Every taxpayer contributes to this fund and most state programs use this as their source of funding, therefore there is consider- able competition for these funds. The Commissioner's Drinking Water Task Force recommended that the program be supported by general fund appropriation. 2. Revenue-Generating Options. a. Cost-of-Service Fee for Water Testing and Inspection for Each Public Water Supply. Cost per person per year ranges from $33.20 (small systems) to $.002 (very large systems). Service Connection Fee for Each Customer Connected to a Community Water Supply. Annual fee of $3.20 per water service connection would generate sufficient revenue to support the program. Fee Based on the Quantity of Water Used by Each Customer of a Commu- nity Water Supply. A fee of $.021 per 1,000 gallons of water used would generate sufficient revenue. Operating Fee. Annual fee based on a sliding scale: noncommunity systems $100 or $200 and community systems $1,300 (less than 100 persons served) to $4,200 (greater than 100,000 persons served). Combination of One or More of the Above. b. c. d. e. MDH, in its report, is recommending the annual service connection fee as the preferred funding alternative, because it is reasonably equitable, easy to administer and assures a stable funding source. A bill imposing this fee will be submitted as part of the Governorls legislative package. It is important to note that both federal and state rules place the responsi- bility of water quality monitoring on the individual water systems. Thus, if the Leqislature takes no action on fundinq the state drinkinq water proqram as outlined. the responsibility for monitorinq water quality and the associ- atedcosts will then be borne by the public water systems. The Legislature will be discussing water supply funding during the current session. Since every public water supply system in the state is affected, we would encouraae yOU to contact your state leaislators and let your feelings be known on the funding alternatives being considered. If you would like to receive a copy of the complete report, please contact me at 612/623-5330 or Dick Clark at 612/623-5227. GLE:RDC:ter o {O S-€ i/z..,,//f?"7 c:.. c Z/' /~'1 COUNTY OF ANOKA COMMUNITY HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOURTH FLOOR COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-422-7000 . i . Public Health Nursing Services Environmental Health Services Mental Health, Mental Retardation, Chemical Dependency Services Family & Children's Services Volunteer Services Developmental Achievement Centers January 23, 1989 MEMO TO: Interested Persons in Anoka County FROM: George J. Steiner, Director I am writing to inform you of three community meetings that will be held to obtain input on needs in Anoka County for the 1990 planning and budgeting'process, The programs i ncl ude community hea lth, envi ronmenta 1 servi ces, menta 1 health, developmental disabilities, child protection, and other social services. The purpose of these meetings is to obtain citizen input which will assist the Anoka County Community Health and Social Services Board in reviewing and determining community needs, Anoka County will also develop their 1990-91 Community Health Services Plan, 1990-91 Community Social Services Act (CSSA) Plan, 1990-91 Mental Health Plan, FFY 90 Title XX Intended Use Report, and other plans based in part on this citizen input. The community meetings will be held at the Anoka County Courthouse in the County Board Room (second floor). The meetings will start at 7:00 p.m. on the following evenings and focus primarily on the indicated topics. Input can be given on topics other than that designated for the evening if you cannot attend the evening your area is being covered, Tuesday, February 7, 7:00 p,m, - Mental Health Thursday, February 16, 7:00 p.m. - Social Services Thursday, February 23, 7:00 p,m. - Community Health and Environmental Services After staff provide introductory comments and summarize some program information, interested citizens and providers will be given an opportunity to express concerns and needs, Since' we want to hear from all interested parties, each person is encouraged to limit his/her remarks to five minutes, We are requesting that any agencies wishing to present comments limit themselves to one spokesperson. Written comments may be submitted in addition to or in place of oral remarks, Thank you for your assistance. GJS:kk o Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer o CITY of ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING - FEBRUARY 7, 1989 - AGENDA 7:30 P.M. Call to Order Resident Forum Agenda Approval Approval of Minutes 1. Public Hearing/89-1/ward Lake Drive 2. Public Hearing/89-2/Tu1ip street 3. Public Hearing/Community Development Block Grant DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Dog Complaint 5. Amend Uniform street Light Policy 6. Order street Lights 7. Pine Bark Beetles/Ord. 29 Amendment 8. stop Sign Request/Narcissus & Bunker Lake Blvd 9. CCWD WMO Committee Report 10. Junkyard License/Commercial Auto Parts 11. WDE Site Report STAFF, COMMITTEE, COMMISSION 12. Approve Fire Department Election Results 13. Award Bid/Fire Vehicle 14. Award Bid/Public Works I-Ton Truck 15. Approve Animal Control Contract 16. Approve Assessor's Contract 17. Approve Law Enforecement Contract 18. Insurance/Fire Department 19. Economic Development Committee Report 20. Report on Traffic Study/County Roads 21. High Band Radio 22. Fire Marshal Position 23. Cable Commissioner 24. Rename Park 25. Schedule Work Session o NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS 26. Red Oaks 6th Addn/Feasibility Report/89-4 27. Accept Easements/87-1l; 88-5 28. Approve Final Payments 29. Declare Costsj88-13. 87-'7. :11)_,1'1, 88-11, 88-7, 88-6,88-5,88-32, [\7-2J 30. Order Public Hearing/"No Wake Ordinance" APPROVAL OF CLAIMS ADJOURNMENT o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DATE February 7. 1q8q FOR Administration ITEM NO. Approval of Minutes Vicki Volk BY: The Ci ty Counci 1 is requested to approve the following minutes: January 10, 1989 Special Meeting January 17, 1989 Regular Meeting January 19, 1989 Special Meeting MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE Februarv 7. 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Public Hearin Engineering ITEM NO. 89-1/Ward Lake Drive BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement and directing preparation of final plans and specs for Project 89-1, Ward Lake Drive. The City Council has ordered a public hearing for the street improvements for Ward Lake Drive - Project 89-1. The City assessment policy provides for assessments for land acquisition on MSA streets. If the property owner dedicates the right-of-way, there will not be an assessment. Attached: Petition Letter to PO's Notice Mailing List Resolution MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY u --.J %9 - I o Land Owners of Ward Lalw Drive 16971 Ward Lake Drive Andover,11n 55304 . Andover tlt)1 Council 16i35 NW Crosstown Blvd. Andover, fvll~ 55X)4 1"0 Andover City Councill1embers: We, as property owners in the City of Andover, request that the section of Ward L;:.ll<e Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 17011 Ward Lake Drive tJe desIgnated a State AId street. The development of' property along this stretch of road has caused concern among the resIdents that Increased usage will result In the upgr(lding of thIs road in the near future. Due to the larger acreage size of the lots boarderlng the road, It would be a hardship to land owners if non-state Aid Improvements were made. We would appreciate consIderation of this request, and action In the near future. Ttlank you for your attention. Landowners Si(~mltures: c~. .- -_oct:;; .... / -~ vr.J-A- o ~ -.--.J o Lanel Owners or Waul L<:llw Dr'lve 16971 Wi.wd Lake Drive Andover, l"ln 5:\:10LI Andover Clt)' Council 16i35 NW Crosst.own Blvel. Af)elover', ["11\1 55::;04 r 0 Anelover' CitV Councill1erntJers: . w(~, as property owner's in th(~ Cityof' Andover, request that the section of W;::1I'd l.al<t;' Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 17011 Ward Lake Drive tJe desi9nated a St;::lte Aid St.reet. The development of property along this strc~tch of ro;::,d h;:ts C,tusecl concern among the residents that Increased usage will result. In th(~ upgr,lding of this road In the near future. Due to the larger acreage size of HIe lots boardering the road, It would tJe a hardship to land owners if non-State Aid improvements were made. We would appreciate consideration of HIls request, and action In the near future. Tr,anl< you for' your att.ention, J Landownel's Siqnatures: --"'\ ,(, (d~G\ jj ~~tI.~~ o i "-...J J o Lanel Own(~rs or Wanl Lalw Drive 16971 Ward Lak.e Drive Andover, 1"'ln 5~=\304 AnclovE'r' City Counci 1 16135 NW Crosstown Blvej, Ane!over, ["1N 55:50.4 r 0 ,A.nd()vc~r' City Councll ('1ern~Jer's: We, as pl'Operty owners in ttle Cityof' Andover, request that ttle section of W;::wd Lal<e Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 17011 Ward Lake Drive tJe clesiqnated a State Aid ~3treet. The development of property along this str:c~tch of' road hf.\s causecl concern among HIe residents that Increased usage will result in the upgrading of this road in t.he~ near future. Due to the larger acre~age size of UI(~ lot.s bo<:srdering t.he road, it would be a hardship to land owners if non-State Aid improvements were made. We would appreciate consicler'ation of nlts request, and action in the near fut.ure. Ttlanl( you for your attention. '/ . e - ,')1,7 <h I'. /: ('Jz,':1{;,. .r -,~ )i.c{A-~""l~ i O!fvc:~.;iV- ,-, Landowner's Signatures: V' '" ,. 1/;/,// /1 .. , u,;3 7~-? {{.>"tJI...-vt"! I)"-"V,ec- ,{)/w'P-:-e. o C' o o Land Owners of Ward Lake Drive 16971 Wafd Lake Drive Andover, l'in 55304 Andover city CounCil 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 To Andover City Council Members: We, as property owners in the City of Andover, request that the section of Ward Lake Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 17011 Ward Lake Drive be designated a State Aid Street. The development of property along this stretch or road has caused concern among the residents that increased usage will result In the upgrading of" this road In the near future, Due to the larger acreage size of the lots boarderlng the road, It would be a hardshi'pto land owners if non-State Aid improvements were made. We would appreciate consideration of this request, and action in the near future. Thank you for your attention. Landowners SignatUres: tJiA, r~, ala ~ o ~} :J o Land Owners of Ward Lake Ortve 16971 Ward Lake Drive Andover, Mn 55304 Andover City Counci I 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 To Andover City Council Mernbers: We, as property owners in the City of Andover, request that the section of Ward Lake Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 1701 t Ward Lake Drive be designated a State Aid Street. The development of property along this stretch of road has caused concern among the residents that Increased usage will result tn the upgnldlng of this road in the near future. Due to the larger acreage size of the lotsboardering.the road, ttwould be a hardshi'p to land owners If non-State Aid improvep;ents were made. We would appreciate consideration of this request, and action in the near future. TMnk you for your attention. Landowners Signatures: c/f'11,J ;J. i?aL /ttJ.r w,J);;(~ 174, c7Jl~' &L o i~ . U '---.J o Land Owners of Ward Lake Drive 16971 Ward Lake OrNe Andover, ["In 55304 Andover City Council 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd. Andover,lvlN 55:504 To Andover City Council Members: We, as property owners in the City of Andover, request that the section of Ward Lake Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 17011 WardLake Drive be designated a State Aid street. The development of property along this stretch ,of' road has caused concern among the residents that Increased usage will result in the upgrading of' this road in the near future. Due to the larger acreage size of the lots boarderin'gthe road, 1t would be a hardshfp to land owners if non-State Aid improvements were made. We would appreciate consideration of' this request, and ~ctlon in the near future. - Thank you for your attentlon. LandOWners~J e J2~ I &, (~ 11'2. (p/jiZO Uc _ I~'Z. o () <~ o Land Owners of Ward Lake Drive 16971 Ward Lake Drive Andover, Mn 55304 Andover City Council 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 To Andover city Council Members: We, as property owners in the Cttyof Andover, request that the section of Ward Lake Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 17011 Ward Lake DriVe be designated a State Aid street. The development of" property along this stretchof' road has caused concern among the residents that Increased usage will result in the upgrading of this road In the near future. Due to the larger acreage size of the lots boardering the road, it would be a hardshfp to land' owners if non-State Aid improvements were made. We would appreciate consideration of this request, and action in the near future. Ttlank you for your attention. Landownel's Signatures: - #~~ J~J~ o '\J' <.J o .I Land Owners of' Ward Lake DrIVe 16971 Ward Lake Drive Andover, Mn 55304 Andover City Council 16i35 NW Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 fo Andover City Council Members: . We, as property oWners in the City of Andover, request that the section of . Ward Lal<e Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 17011 Ward Lake Drive be designated a State Aid Street. The development of property along this stretch of roa(lhas cal.lsed concer~ among the residents that lncreased usage will result In thel.tpgradlng of thls road In the near future. Due to the larger acreage size of thelotsboardeHng the road, it would be a hardshfp toland owners if non-State Aid improvements were made. We would appreciate consideration of this request, and action 1n the near future., Thank you for your attention. Landowners SiqhatUres: - . - ~~~ ~ {!~i4-~ )V~ChJ / ~-;/c21 ~/tt~ of ~ tXf}u t:(:nd.J'2Ll.-U.) ~ o u . 0 . Land Owners of Ward Lake Drive 16971 Ward Lal<e Drive Andover, Mn 55304 o Andover CitYCouricU. . 1685 NW Crosstowh Blvd. Andover, lvll~ 55304 To Andover City Council rlernbers: We, as property owners in the Cityof Ando\ier, request that the section of Ward Lal<e Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 17011 Ward Lake Drive be ctesignated a State Aid street. The development of property along this stretch of road has caused concern among the residents that increased usage will result in the upgrading of this road In the near future. Due to the larger acreage size of the lots boarderlng the road, it would be a hardship to land owners jf non-State Aid improvements were made. We would appreciate consideration of this request, arid action In the near future. . Thank YOIJ for your attention. ;i;:Si~~ o u Land Owners of Ward Lake Drive 16971 Ward Lake DrlYe Andover,Mn 55304 Andover..C.Jt.y. C.ouncil,. 1685 NW crosstown Blvd. Andover, (vII\! 55304 To Andover City Council 11embers: We,as property owners in the City 01" Andover, request that the section of Ward Lal<e Drive from Crosstown,~oulevard to 17011 Ward Lake Drive be designated a sta.te Aid Street. The development of property along. this stretch of"road has caused concern among the residents that Increased usage will result inthe upgrading of this road In the near future. Due to the larger acreage size of the lots boardering,toe road, It would be a hardship to land owners if non-State Aidimproyernehts were made. We \lIould appreciate conslderapon of thisreejuest, and action in the near future. Thank yo~ for your atte!)t loni] ~:~~~A~~ Landowners Signatures: t t: -I- - I,: '. I ..L 7J~7Jj , 1',,1 c CC ~ '-, _ .' -' T ' '[ Pl" ~ J V -. . I. .1 ~ --(. .". " .... ,---- . r- '-' ~,..7\ -, 'r - I .' ,~ - - ,...' ~ ' ., f--;-' L -T""'8 ~- ., "1" ,/ ' ' - , .' . " ' I -I - ' , ~' I i - ' ' _ Ji ~7(71 ~ i r'~ "'" . 1 ~//I . , 1 g ~'. u , I I' [11 1 - ::] - , L-- ., I --------,- __ I ~ ~ 1 - , WARO~\ ~ - '-- --' . _ . LAKE' - I . t::: ~ '\ il ;;:.-n.. ~ -' h : - : '1 "', "'~ -.de - ,I '. I ;iWW' i'*"'" [);jf 'ii) ,{i7 ,;:.-/' ~" ___ I _ 1 . fAl-J' ,.,. · ii' il'i.t"i4~: ".i..~ /--;::'-.1 '. .T ____ I ""h' ,.,.,/,_" " ", ~ / 'I. - .' ,- ",3""". .'. ' , .' ""Y " \1. ,,:; ; i" 1 . . I.. ..... \..... ...'..... :,: . .... \),<' .,: l-l I u . C' ",'" '.' ! ". " _I"~ J' 1 '--' ,"-- ' , -'= ~ I I ~SJ........".\i.:.~".~;;.!............... ef/ofmber'k . ~~;. ~i~r~;~~ - ~ I I " . .".:t' ';"'1""" U ~", : ~ .' ,... <LA -l ..' , !' .. ,"'<''''"' " ! ' ," .' 11'" LA'" , ~ I !",\, '; , ","Al...t~.t.,::1li'>:. '~~~r;'" LE. M~ ~ . ' I." 'lr: ,"':,.0' ._1~~'1-:":' :;. 1"1 < "NOEREO --,- T. '. . i.. ' '}':'~ ,!iik(' ,,:';' 1 p"'" """ -/J I . _~"" ~_ A ..i. .... . ,'V;T')!"1"";" ,'.' ".,'" -- ."i,' ". ..". . . "',,~,~ ,,.-.,. . , _ I ...,.....\ .;..' 5...._....1 .,.~."....i'1I..... ')/1..<' o ;.,,:;'1 ' "::(:', ~e.e~o.~.."'. ^ ,'Jar' '". I..... O I c:Pct'" ."""", . ", .,--.::,;..,,,.,.," ,~ .. N . ^ ~.:..' I , . _c,_. u_ _ I' ,~ -".' f,t .~,,' i\{1;' "_. . . ",/, ! 0', 1'.."'" U. " _' ...-0' ~ t' " G ___ I ",", : 1O~I"rt.- ~ ;;il~~;:~ lfL; >." . _0 ' "1!~';' - . ~ l ......" j ,.." ~'~.,~.lI;.~mJ' 0 T , . ,w ' ""'0'" 0 i "" ' ~." .. ".,~l<;0f - "" " . . ' ,,'-', ' " "" ' . -- " ' ...-" - ~ " " ' ,,~",s,~ I _ I-- _ " '\; D l - - - . ""~1!{' . . ,,",-<- ' ,{_.' '-';" '-~- ' . _,," __ .._ 'u ,,',' ,""" nn T1 "~~~> ';'~II\ ,:'''''\l~ n__ .. ~--n- 1 _-.. ~,,,;;....._..'. PQ.~...'.I.".'.""'.' ,----- 1- " =- - _" "'c' '-= ..II"?'" ' I -~~::- _../'I~".3. 'L' ~. .-,.' '-.:;l -~o:- -4~--~ I _ _~,"",,' ".I~.:r ,_ ..' ,'~'TflL~ ,Pi. . ~ _ e" - ' ' · I ~ ,. ... "..~ p.. ;/1 '0 16 '...... .............. .' '......4'... "- ' / II r-.... Yil .' _" - .1 ' "I ' ' , ,I . l,~"d ,J;of-- ~' " '1' \..1 i . 1 . "" ~';;;<;'-11 '7/, ",--- L . I G.' . ' /I - 1=7/ ,e" _ ,~t.. ~1/,..,: ' '1 - I r _ _ _ 'c 1c-II.7?' I I / -- ~ ........- , -- ....' . - - - ' -, '" .' , I . IL J,......." '- I . r T-.:.,.";,,.....~ I .... .... If ~ --, -----~ r ,,--'----n-rr- , ,~ ---~ " ~ " . ',,~ II .....,':..J~AI' 'I .... ....~-.j/~ , J - o CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 January 24, 1989 Re: Proposed Street Construction for Ward Lake Drive #89-1 (from Crosstown Boulevard to 173rd Avenue) Dear Residents: The City has prepared its street construction program for 1989. One of the streets that is being proposed for improvement on the Municipal state Aid street System is Ward Lake Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 173rd Avenue. The City is proposing to construct Ward Lake Drive as a 32-foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter with "no parking" allowed on the street. The City's assessment policy for MSA streets briefly states that the City assesses the cost of right-of-way acquisition. If there isn't right-of-way acquisition necessary, there of course isn't an assessment. The right-of-way descriptions along Ward Lake Drive are vague; therefore, the City will be drawing up descriptions and requesting the property owners to sign a document dedicating the right-of-way. The street will be similar to 157th Avenue and the part of prairie Road south of Andover Boulevard. A public meeting is scheduled at City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on February 7, 1989 to discuss the proposed plan. Sincerely, OF ANDOVER ames E. Schrantz ublic Works Director/City Engineer JES:kmt o o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 89-1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. in the City of Andover, on February 7, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the making of the following improvement: Street and Storm Drain Construction The property to be assessed, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429, for such improvement is within the following described area: Ward Lake Drive from Crosstown Boulevard to 173rd Avenue The estimated cost of such improvement is $438,500.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. CITY OF ANDOVER ,~;;a Victor1a Volk - City Clerk Dated: " "'SI In? , . 32..24 33 0005 Dallas'"C.' ,& Ann M: Cain, 2507 ,Emerson Av~.: N' Mpls ;,MN 554 II 3 2 ' .24 3 3 000 3 David"R. Lexcen . -' 16595 'Ward lake Dr. Andover, M:N 55304 .,' 12 32 24 33 0001 RaymondPalm :,16615 Ward Lake Dr. Andover, MN 55304 I I 32" 2 4 4 I John Ganter 14915 Hwy 65 Andover, MN 0001 NE 55304 . ' 0_. .__~__.~......,._.-_.,.;-___..___ _ 12 32 24 32 00 q I " . illiam M. Frantz 24054 Rum River Blvd. St. Francis, MN 55070 12 32: 24 32 0002' Ronald W. Sweezo 168531Ward Lake Dr.. NW And~yer, MN 55304, 12 3224 23 0002 H.T. 'Halvorson & C. .Heitoff 16915 Ward Lake Dr. Andover"MN 55304 II 322414 000 I Frances Selmer, . ,17000 Ward Lk., Dr. Andover, MN 55304 12 32 24 23 0001 WayneE.Holmberg 17011 Ward lake Dr. NW Andover, MN 55304 12 32 24 22 0004 RichardH.& Joan Nelsori ~40 S. Diamond La~e Rd. Wton, M~ 55327 ___i .. - . I I I I . . ~,t :: ; ,. ifc~~r~\:2 & o~~:n Nelson.,;:I. 12840 S. Diamond Lake Rd.':i Dayton;' MN 55327 ,I 12 32 24 22 0002 Tod R. Nelson 17163 Ward Lk. Dr. Andover, MN ' 55304 12 32 24 22 0003 Richard & Joan Nelson 12840 S. Diamond Lake Dayton~'MN 55327 , .: 13 32 24 23 0005 County of Anoka 325 E. Main St. Anoka, MN. 55303 , j ,. .. 13 32 24 23 0006 : Roger S~ Henrikson i 741 Constance Blvd. .i '. Andover, MN 55304 I " i~' '1 13 32 24 23 0007 Gerald Garrison 16147 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 5530A , i I 1- .. I ! , 13 32 24 22 0005 ".' County of' Anoka, 325 E. Main St. Anoka" Mn 55303 ':: ')'"; Hwy I' I I 13 32 24 22 0001 i Carrol E. Schultz 16331 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 13 32 24 22 0011 John Berg 16324 Crosstown Blvd Andover, MN 55304 13 32 24 22 0009 . .Dale B. & Kimberly Beidleman 16358 Crosstown Blvd. Anokal MN 55304 13 32 24 22 0013 Earl R. & Florence RR; 1 Isanti, MN 14 32 24 14 0004 .; , ,I' " 16060 Crosstown Blyd. :Andover,MN 5530~W . '. . ,.... N~l I 4 32 241 4 . 0003 , Constance Ev~n Free Church .' 16060 Crosstown Blvd. 'Andover,' MN 55304 Dr. tT .C" ,14;-32 24 13 t~arl & Ruth -~.l' 0005 Anderson 32 24 14 0001 ~Constance Evan Fre~ Church ~16060 Crosstown Blvd. ,;.Andover, Mn 55304' .y::.' I' '14 32 2414 0006 ~Jos~ph Pogones .116234 Crosstown Blvd. ~ndover, MN 55304 14 32 24 I I 0005 Lila M. Sanders ,,10101 Dup~nt Ave. S. CMpls, MN '.55431 :13 3224'22 0012 ~John & Sharon Handorf i 163 79 Ward Lake Dr., NW' " .Andover, MN 55304~ '13 3224 22 0007 Carol L. Miettinen NW'I6421 Waxd Lake Dr. ,Andover, MN 55304: . , fl'3 32 24 22 0014 Dallas & Ann Cain ,2507 Emerson Ave. N. ' Hpls, MN 55411 13 32 24 22 0008 Robert R. Root 16309 Ward Lake Dr. Andover, MN 55304 .'1 .......,.--......-....--..... 113 32 24 22 0010. '.: Robert R., Root '. . ,1.16309 Ward Lake Dr.' . i Andover, MN 55304 ! o o t I i I 13 32 24 11 0004 Ronald & Perri Herst 16440 Wird Lake Dr. Andover, MN SS3Q4 , j i 1. i I 1 I I " ; l. ! , ' o . o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREET AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION, PROJECT NO. 89-1 IN THE WARD LAKE DRIVE CROSSTOWN TO 172ND AVENUE AREA AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. WHEREAS, Resolution No. R010-89 of the City Council adopted on the 17th day of January, 1989, fixed a date for a public hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the required published and mailed notice, such hearing was held on the 7th day of February, 1989; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard were given such opportunity for same; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 89-1. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby designate Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates as the Engineer for this improvement and they are directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements. MOTION seconded by Councilman the City Council at a and adopted by day of Meeting this , 19 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, voting against, and Councilmen whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling-Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7, 1989 Engineering FOR AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. 89-2/Tulip street BY: James E. Schrantz The city Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement and directing preparation of final plans and specs for project 89-2. The City Council has ordered a public hearing for street improvements for the north end of Tulip street at County Road 58, project 89-2. The City's assessment policy provides for assessments for land acquisition on MSA streets. If property owners dedicate the right-of-way, there will not be an assessment. This project wasn't petitioned for - the Road Committee recommended it - 4 votes are required. Attached: Letter to PO's NO,tice Mailing List Resolution MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304- (612) 755-5100 January 24, 1989 Re: Proposed street Construction for #89-2, Tulip street (400' south of 169th Lane to County Road 58) Dear Residents: The city has prepared its street construction program for 1989. One of the streets that is being proposed for improvement on the Municipal State Aid Street System is Tulip Street from 400' south of 169th Lane to County Road 58. The City is proposing to construct Tulip Street as a 32 foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter with "no parking" allowed on the street. The City's assessment policy for MSA streets briefly states that the City assesses the cost of right-of-way acquisition. If there isn't right-of-way acquisition necessary, there of course isn't an assessment. The right-of-way descriptions along Tulip Street are vague; therefore, the City will be drawing up descriptions and requesting the property owners to sign a document dedicating the right-of-way. The street will be similar to 161st Avenue and the part of Tulip street just south of 161st Avenue. A public meeting is scheduled at City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on February 7, 1989 to discuss the proposed plan. Sincerely, Y OF ANDOVER mes E. Schrantz Public Works Director/City Engineer o o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 89-2 NOTICE I,S HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the Ci ty of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. in the City of Andover, on Feburary 7, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the making of the following improvement: Street and Storm Drain Construction The property to be assessed, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429, for such improvement is within the following described area: Tulip Street from 400' South of 169th Lane to County Road 58 The estimated cost of such improvement is $113,300.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. CITY OF ANDOVER ~w Victoria Volk - City Clerk Dated'~ dJ-.3 I /7' %f , , / 08 32' 24 24 0010 Klenk"Raymond L. Rt. I Rush City, MN 55069 "03;--;;'24 00 II " Simi, Ronald C. & Judith 16958 Valleyview Dr. NW Andover, MN 55304 _....._. ...-1 08 32 24 130003 Horner, Morgan L. & Helen 355 I 170th Lane NW ' Anoka, MN55304 08 32 24.130004 Joseph T. Cutinelta 3531 170th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 ""1 I 08 32 24 13 0005 Donald W. & Joy Sariderj, 35 I I 170th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 :"f: i I, I i Daileyl 08 32 24 24 0016 Fred R. & Lorraine 17004 Valley Dr. '. Andover, MN 55304 08 32 24 J3 0006 Charles A. Bradley 1701 I Tulip St. NW Andover, MN 55304 ..,1. I 08 32 24 13 0007 Michael L. & J.S. 3530 170th Ln. NW Andover, MN 55304 Johnson OR 32 24 13 0008 .Gerry V. McFee 3510 170th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 08 32 24 24 0003 Roger E. Renner , 16950 Tulip St. NW Over, ~,N 55304 08 32 24 13 0009 DaleA. & Susan R. Giloy 16981 Tulip St. NW Andov~r, MN 55304 083224130012 .1 Raymond &,Theresa 'Johnsonl 3527 169th Lane NW : Andover, MN 55304 ....-.----.- --- .._-.-. -- - --. . ~ 08 32 24 24 0002 Donald & Judith Thompson 1695~ Valley Dr. NW Andover, MN 55304 ! . ---r-~-""'- 08 32 24 24 0001 ,Stephen C. Seymour 16925 Valley Dr. NW Andover, MN ' 55304 0?04 "-"1-:---'. T1na Hurber, :, I St. NW I 55304 i L ,.""-- .- --i 08 32 24 24 Carles L. & 16910 Tulip 'Andover, MN 08 32 24 13 Russel D. &, 16933 Tulip , Andover, MN 0019 Susan McGary St. NW 55304 I .. __..,______u__ .n:"'_.-_.__i 08 32 24 13 0018 William & Catherine Hokkanen 3522 .169th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 I I --r-- ., I j I I r--- I o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREET AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION, PROJECT NO. 89-2 IN THE TULIP STREET COUNTY ROAD 58 TO 400' SOUTH OF 169TH LANE AREA AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. WHEREAS, Resolution No. ROll-89 of the City Council adopted on the 17th day of January, 1989, fixed a date for a public hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the required published and mailed notice, such hearing was held on the 7th day of February, 1989; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard were given such opportunity for same; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby order improvement project No. 89-2. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby designate Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates as the Engineer for this improvement and they are directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements. MOTION seconded by Councilman the City Council at a and adopted by day of Meeting this , 19 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling-Mayor victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Public Hearing 3. ITEM Communi ty Development NO. Block Grant DATE Februarv 7. 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning BY: Jay Blake, APPRO AGENQ Plann~ ) The City Council is requested to hold a public hearing for the 1989 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) proposal. The enclosed memo outlines the proposed uses for the Andover CDBG allocation, including: MOTION BY TO Blight Removal Comprehensive Plan update Public Service Programs COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY of ANDOVER MEMORANDUM TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: Andover City Council File Jay Blake, City Planner February 7, 1989 REFERENCE: I have received a copy of the anticipated 1989 Community Development Block Grant funding proposal from Anoka County. The amount available was $4,157 higher than expected. Please review the proposed budget (including revised totals) for the next two years. Our final proposal is due on February 28, 1989. Community Dev~lopment Block Grant Budget Funding Allocation: 1988 - 1990 $108,545.00 ( 3 year total) Projects Blight Removal Compo Plan Public Total Revision Service Year 1988 $34,563 -0- -0- $34,563 Plus Project Income 1989 $7,141 $2Q,000 $9,850 $36,991 1990 $7,141 $20,000 $9,850 $36,991 Total $48,845 $40,000 $19,700 $108,545 Plus Project Income Tnese figures will be submitted to the County for final approval. The final figures will be based on the requests from other communities and the prescribed percentages for each of the categories. o o o 1989 ANOKA COUNTY COBG PROGRAM FINAL FROM HUO Area J - $626,392 1 Anoka 1 Blaine 1 Columbia Heights 1 Coon Rapids 1 Fridley Area II - $178,775 2 Andover 2 East BEthel 2 Ham lake 2 Lino lakes 2 Ramsey 2 Spring lake Park Area III - $81,751 (+$35,586.00 prior years carryover) 3 Circle Pines 3 Columbus Township 3 Linwood 3 Oak Grove Area IV - $38,082 (Jess $15,573.00 prior years expense) 4 Hilltop County E.D. County Rehab County Admin Total County Total Budget 1989 Budgets 135,300 110,769 140,230 130,194 109,899 36,991 37,324 25,974 27,537 26,011 24,938 63,000 170,000 85.000 318,000 1,263,013 Three Year Allocation 37,351 15,801 50,339 51,197 22,508 o ANOKA COUNTY 1989 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT WORK SCHEDULE Through January 15 Initial discussions among local staff/elected officials concerning new projects, January 15 - January 30 City/County discussions about new projects, (Time to resolve eligibility, etc,) February 1 - February 28 Any local public hearings, February 28 CITY APPLICATIONS DUE AT COUNTY. Any adjustments necessary to accommodate percentage limitations for planning, public service and slum/blight activities will be made at this point. Any communities submitting after this date will be limited by the percentages left in these categories. March 1 - March 15 County assists cities/towns to refine project application requests (gathering local data, supporting material, etc.) March 15 - April 10 County develops final grant request including all city/town project requests, HAP, goals, objectives, and budget. April 11 County Board Public Hearing, April 12 - April 17 Complete final grant writing and publishing. April 21 Publish proposed Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds, May 9 County Board reviews final Application of Funds. May 10 Submit grant request. July 1 1989 CDBG funding available for commitment/expenditure, (Completing any necessary environmental reviews and notices during April and May will allow for immediate use of project funds in July,) o CO U N TV OF ANOKA Office of the County Board of Commissioners COURTHOUSE ANOKA,MINNESOTA55303 612-421-4760 November 29, 1988 Mr. Jay Blake, Planner City of Andover Community Center 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N,W, Andover, Minnesota 55304 Dear Jay: I am sending the 1989 CDBG Application Schedule that was not included in the TAC meeting handouts, Please note the February 28 due date for CDBG applications, This date is very important because of limitations to the percentages of the grant that can be allocated to public service. planning and slum/blight activities. Each community can be sure of 15% for public service, 7% for planning and 40% for slum/blight activities. Anything in excess of those limits depends on the aggregate percentages from all community applications received, Those numbers will be tallied on February 28, Any applications received later will be subject to the "leftover" percentages, If you have any questions about the schedule, please call me, 922- JoAnn 0, Wright Community Development Manager JOW:sw o Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer .'$"'.1 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7, 1989 AGENDA SECTION NO, Discussion Items 4 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administration APPROVED FOR AGENNS,,, ~~ BY: J I ITEM NO. Dog Complaint BY:Vicki Volk This item was originally scheduled for the December 20th meeting but was tabled as a result of a request from the Klick's attorney. We have several police reports regarding this dog attacking a dog owned by Judy Lentz (see attached reports.) According to ordinance 53, this dog can be declared a "biting dog". I have attached a resolution in the event Council does so. The state statutes now require the owner of a dangerous dog to register it with the Auditor's office. This is to be done by a police officer. A copy of the letter from the County Attorney is attached outlining the procedures. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY o TO SECOND BY CITY of ANDOVER December 9, 1988 Mr. & Mrs. Dan Klick 3061 - 142nd Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Klick: We have had several recent complaints regarding your dog running loose and ~ttacking other domestic animals. A request has been made to declare your dog a "biting dog" pursuant to Andover City Ordinance No. 53, a copy of which is enclosed. This item will be discussed at the City Council meeting on December 20, 1988 which begins at 7:30 P.M. If you have any questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, CITY OF ANDOVER u.u Vicki Volk City Clerk Attachment: Ordinance i53 o i: . i L 1-" ,.; " ~.: H. , " t" '": ~.~. ~: . j; ! .. " , ACSO OFFENSE REPORT , 88-153579 DEPT CASE # . , C';;) ') ;:'>: , OFFENSE: DATE REPORTED: TIME: ... rx:J:; proBLEM 11-15-88 ' 1013 hrs lfIas there a witness to the crime? (If yes, place an X in box.) LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 11-1~~ITTED BETWEEN W ANOOVER DATE: -:!:200-hrs & DATE: :E TIME: TIME: a: Is there physical evidence present? (If yes, place an X in box.) 0 WAS SCENE PROCESSED? YES 0 NO 0 IS FURTHER PROCESSING NECESSARY? NO 0 YES M,C,I.U. DETECTIVE(S) BY WHOM? AT SCENE , Are, there circumstances or a noticeable MO indicating a need for additional investigation? ,. (If yes, place an X in box.) Is stolen property traceable? ' (If yes, place an X in box.) ;.~ box.) Was anyone arrested? "(If yes, place. an X in Is there a suspect vehicle? (If yes, place an X in box.) I- YEAR: MAKE: COLOR(S): IDENTIFYING MARKS/CHARACTERISTICS: 0 W ,.. D- en LICENSE #: LICENSE STATE: , ::> en Is there Information about a suspect? (If yes, place an X in box.) V-Victim W.1.Wltnes5 PR-Person reporting A-Arrested (list Race & Sell.) O-owner S-Suspecl W-2-Wilness PK-Petson wl1h knowledge PO.P,erson discovering AD-Address checked CODE PERSONS DOB ADDRESS TELEPHONE Judith carol Ientz .Al"lClOVer , RES# /~/-/O~U PR 14222 I~ St. ' BUS# Dan Klick BIlOOver RES# /'::>/-':J/,j/ S 3061 - 142nd AveNW BUS# ; I RES# en BUS# Z RES# " 0 .' BUS# en RES# ' a: ~ w BUS# 0- RES# , . .' .- BUS# .. RES# '. ' , BUS# RES# BUS# RES# , , BUS# RES# BUS# I certify the above information is true and correct X z ASSISTING OFFICER(S) 0 PROPERTY LOSS REPORT? YES 0 NO 0 ~ o INACTIVE o CLEARED BY ARREST ' ' o UNFOUNDED o EXCEPTIONALLY CLEARED REPORTING OFFICER DATE I- o OTHER: Deputy Skog .ls 11-17-88 en Z OFFICER ASSIGNED ::E BY: DATE: SUPERVISOR DATE C < >'.1 o o o o o o o o Act JI Z ORIGINAL FORM 3 "'..") C SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION REPORT ;~) 88-153579 CASE NO. o ocx; PROBLEM OFFENSE COMPLAINANT ADDRESS ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF OFFENSE, PROGRESS OF INVESTIGATIONS, ETC, COmplainants femaJeSchnauzer attacked by suspects female Spaniel in complainants front yard while out to go tx>tty. , Schnauzer severely bruised by Spaniel and now afraid to go outside. Will take' to vet to ascertain injuries as also appmrs to be unstredy on her feet. naw~ 'Ibis had beena proble:n for SOlOO..time. 'Ibe spaniel has' attacked compliHnant's at least twice before this past sunner. , ',:\ Complainant states suspects dog has been running loose numerous times am is uncontroll- able by sqspect owner. She has spoken to suspect and his wife several times aOOut this but nothing appears to be done to control this SpaiUel. Advised complainant to contact City Attorney for a fonnal complaint against suspect for allowing dog to run at large in violation of city ordinance. 11-17-88 Is Deputy Skog THIS OFFENSE IS DECLARED: "'nded 0 <Wed by Arrest . 0 Exceptionally Cleared 0 Inactive (Not Cleared) 0 This Form Is Used by Olflcer Assigned to a Case to Report Progress Alter Three and Seven Days and Weekly Thereafter, Also to Report Significant Developments. ACS.014 SIGNED DATE Investlgetlng Officer SIGNED DATE Chief or Commending Olllcer Form 2 '. '. '-~,.I,....,.;~>~~ ;;OFISENSEREPQRT ,.r: ~;~~;,;, ';'!'> ;:" '!';~1'~1~~j~f~' ' ..~ ..... '.';;: ~.; ~~--; :: 1. rt~)!~., ,';';:',,:. ~r,. . ::-';.~':~' ~r~ (If' yes,") place ,;an', X ' IS 'FURTHER PR09ESSI~G"~~9~S,S,i\':l'(? ',NO ~,.~.I.U. DETECTIV~(~Ur:. '. : :;,~~~:H/:~'~Fk:H~:;;~i:.' '. ~,~ il;::~~':~':;':';': BY WHOM? :: ":~'.,;. '~sler, AT SCENE .." "",';';;,~!,,:"',/;:":; Are .there circumstances or: a noticeable MO indicating a need ,for additional investigation? ,.; " '. ,A ;'.."H!:~~;" .' "'~':"" " , '\ ' '.. ' '" If eso'; place' an X in box.} Is stolen;' property;ttraceable? (If yes,',: place an . X in',.box.} , '.i,:;~,'i . -~;~,::~\:I:. ~~:~fr ~:!:-L ~ t;':Ar~~ Di;':~ ,. .. .:",: ;," ...'~. ' . " ;,:,;. - ~ Is, there information about a suspect? ,(If yes, place an X in box.) 0 '.' ; ..':.1 . V-Victim W~1~Witness PR-Person reporling A-Arrested lList Race & Sex) Q-Owner . :;,~ ;_~~: ~-Suspecl !. W-2~Witness PK-Person with knowledge PO-Person discovering . AO~Address checked .1 . DOB ADDRESS er 14222 Ivy Wood St. 1-28-47 "'!!.-. ,:"1,,',' : ~; '.,' :';;t~ : .1:.,' ):~..- .~~: . :f" ';~t; ;:...:. ti I- I~~~,., ~ '!~.~~:':'~ ~:;~~: ~ I certify the above' information is true and correct X ' PROPERTY LOSS REPORT? ' , YES 0 NO 0 o INACTIVE .:;f'1;1cicLEARED BY ARREST o UNFOUNDED;';~~!O~XCEP'nONALLYCLEARED' .. . D OTHER::'~ 't ~:'t::~~~,n~~~}~J! -'i '::'<-T:.~>:.:~,::~' ~--:~',~ ~: ; . ': OFFICER ASSIGNEOZ1j:j1'; .' 'st i, "~:: ' !,.~r~'f~l;~:; " ACI'.012 2ND COPY FORM 3 SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION REPORT 88-160154 CASE NO, o OFFENSE ANIMAL C-Cfv1PT A TN'!' PAGE 1 COMPLAINANT ADDRESS ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF OFFENSE, PROGRESS OF INVESTIGATIONS, ETC, , ' On 11.",30-.88 at 1333 hours, I received a call of a dog complaint at 14222 Ivy W:Jod St. NW in Andover. It should ,be noted that the. Sheriff~s Office has been called to that location on dog complaints several times in the Past couple nonths. U};x)n lIlY p,rrival, I sr;oke..with the complainant who stated that she observed a dog running lcose in ,her yard and the neighbor's yard' and stated that the dog carne from between the houses directly across the street from her address., She stated the dog looked very similar to the dog that had attacked her dog on three prior occassions and that dog belonged to the Klick residence at 3061 - 142J?d Lane NW. . ! In talking 'with the complainant,' she stated that ~e ,was not r;ositive that that dog belonged to the Klickfarnily and also. stated that there is a similar, dog, in the neighborhcod and it could ~ave beenthis other dog. She stated she did not know the owner of the other dog. Complainant',was very upset as her dog had been attacked twice'by the Klick dog and that she had had to:take the' dog to the veterinary clinic and have the dog treated. She was , very muchafraid,tllatthe neighbor's dog would severely injure or kill her dog. She stated,sl1e Was terrified tq let the dog alone out on the leashand stated' on one occassion she was outwith,the.dog and the neighbor's dog still attacked her dog. She was very upset about this and wanted to know what could be done. l advised ber that, I would talk to the 'neighbor regarding the incident today, however with her ~ing un<:u;:>le to r;os1tively identifY' the dog, unless I observed the dog IIlYselfoff of . the property',' ,I. would not be able to. issue a citatdon for violation of Andover's dog ordi- , nance.' l did go on:i:o advise the complainant that Andover soes have a dog ordinance which provides 'that: if the dog 'is involved in a dog bite situation, be it against a person or an animal. twice, or norewithin the city, the city CO\IDcil may by resolution declare the dog a bitin<i dog and order its rerrovalfrcm the city. Conplainant: she had contacted mediation services with Anoka Co~ty and that she is waiting for a reply fran them Whether or not the Klicks will voluntarily with medi~tion services. Conplainant stated that if the Klicks were not resr;onsive to this that she would contact 'the c~ty clerk and request ~at city <;:6uncil r.eview the matter to declare the'd9g a biting dog. ' ' ' , I then went over to the Klick r~sidence and sr;oke with Jan Klick ,who stated that her dog had been inside with her all day today. In checking the dog, the dog did not appear to be wet or dii'ty as there is quite a bit of snow on the ground at this time and complainant THIS OFFENSE IS DECLARED: Unfounded 0 Oed by Arrest :- 0 Exceptionally Cleared , 0 Inactive (Not Cleared) 0 SIGNED DATE Investigaling Ofllcer SIGNED DATE Chief or Commanding Ofllcer This Form is Used by Officer Assigned to a Case to Report Progress After Three and Seven Days and Weekly Thereafter, Also to Report Significant Developments, ACS-014 o OFFENSE "...,'" 88~16015,t I ,CASE NO. :,., , : ';}J';f;[~f"',,:!:~.r!,,!,::,;':,~,i:,'t,'~,:,;~r \1 "';l~tj:; . ".' ' FORM 3 SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION REPORT. : ANIMAL CG1PLAINT PAGE 2 COMPLAINANT ADDRESS ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF OFFENSE. PROGRESS OF INVESTIGATIONS, ETC. .,. stated'that.th~eis another dog in the neighborhood that is often confused for her dog. She stated she did not know who.:the owner of ~t dog was. . ' I adviSed,the owner; Nrs. Klick, of'my. complaint fran her neighbor and Mrs. Klick was enphatic that her dog was contained inside the residence all day today and that it defi- nitely was' nOt' her dog. Sl1.e stated she had not resf'Qnded to mediation services yet as she wantedto.speclk with an attorney. I advised .her'~f the bitix1g dog o~dinance and suggested it may be in her best interest to voluntarily cooperate with rnec1iatiol;'l services in an attempt to mediate some type of resolve between her, and her neighbor regarding the dog probl~. Mrs. Klick stated she would ,contact mediation servi~s today am VIOuld voluntarily coop- erate with then in an attempt to solve the neighborhood problem ,SO we \\Quld not receive eorrplaintlnin the future. '. 0- . . At this time no f:urther actioh l'waS taken by myself. I cleared the residence, returned to the ~rrplainant' s residence and advised her of our conversation., She .stated she was very satisfied with this action and \\Quld not be taking any further' action unless the Klick family did not corne through as they had intended to in the way of cooperating with IDedaition services. 12-1-88 ls Deputy S. Ibessler #86 ~nded Wed by Arrest; Exceptionally Cleared Inactive (Not Cleared) THIS OFFENSE IS DECLARED: o o .0 o SIGNED DATE Investigating Officer SIGNED DATE Chief or Commanding Olllcer This Form Is Used by Officer Assigned to a Case to Report Progress After Three and Seven Days and Weekly Thereafter, Also to Report Significant Developments. , ACS.014 . Ol.ff':' f To U c/. JJ lee 0, 'rz.J/J! ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY ROBERT M.A. JOHNSON CourtholLse - Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612-421-4760 November 21, 1988 Mr. James E. Schrantz Administrator, City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 55304 ......-.. -,.-".::" '.~ ~; --.,'"'f 'C'" RRU - . RE: Procedures for Reporting and Registering Dangerous Dogs Minn. Stat. li 347.50, et. seq. CITY OF ANDOVER Dear Mr. Schrantz: In 1988 the Minnesota Legislature amended Minn. Stat. li 347, et. seq. requiring that the owner of a dangerous dog register it with the Auditor's Office in the County in which the owner resides. A copy of this new legislation, which was effective August 1, 1988, is enclosed herein for your reference. To implement the new dangerous dog legislation, the County of Anoka proposes to use the following procedure: 1. Upon report of a dangerous dog incident, the matter is referred to the police department, who after investigation by either a community service officer or a peace officer, will fill out a five-part form for reporting dangerous dog incidents (see the proposed enclosed form). One copy of the form will go to the owner of the dog, one to the police, one to the animal control officer, one to the victim and one to the Anoka County Auditor's Office. .. 2. If the owner does not register the dog within 14 days of the incident, the Anoka County Auditor's Office shall refer the matter to the City Attorney's Office for prosecution as a misdemeanor under Minn. Stat. li 347.55. At the same time that the matter is referred to the City for prosecution, a notice will be sent to the dog owner indicating the same. 3. Upon conviction of the misdemeanor charge, the City will notify the Anoka County Auditor's Office, who will then confiscate the dog that is not registered in a timely fashion. o Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer o o I would welcome your comments on the proposed procedure outlined above and the proposed form that is to be used in implementing the procedure. I would request that all comments be set forth in writing and forwarded to me within 14 days of the date of this letter, at which time I will review the comments, and, if possible, incorporate them into the procedure for the registration of the dangerous dog. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. If you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Dc,>--, \ /. '\ / \, ----.......'. "\_-.l \,- \ ...--- Dan Klint Assistant Anoka County Attorney DK:cjm cc: Police Chiefs of Municipalities Located in Anoka County Managers of Cities Located in Anoka County "(I; ...' <5' ~:J CD ll) 111- e>>:@ =a 111-0 () CD :rll) &\) fJ 8$1 "C _. ,<0 CD o ... -0 - ... :1')> CD :J 5" ~r 2.ll) 0.- CDC') ::J 0 -:J ... - CD ... "CQ. g$1 . ,r CD ... CI> <5' :J !!l. c: ... CD o - ~ :J CD ... o !!l. CD o ~ o ~~ii~ jf~f~ ~iijl l!tfi~ · &' - i ;I 3.3.~ -< 2- f !L <t I !I. I -1- :r:" m-< 00 _C ~O ,,0 Oz :00 -0-1 :0:0 Om Cl>Ci) ~cn c-l -lm _:0 0-1 Z:r: )>m Cl>O )>0 3:G> w:E O:::j m:r: 3:- ~~ z~ 00 :0)> -o~ :00 " c-l )>:r: ~m -10 O~ 3:m ZO Z" ~~ ~w :-lz o :::! :"1m -I :r: 3: ~ m :0 :E r r OJ m :0 m " m :0 :0 m o -I OJ S-;p z 0 z ~~~ & ~ ~ :::!- ...." c: CD CD ::i 0 III .....CQ c::;) (; 0 . .. :::s.... Q. ~ ~~ 0" en S-rh'O').~ i~ ~~~ ~ -g CD ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~'1lI ~:;) '< oiS-~tr~~.g.~CD~ !. ~Q..CDCDoo:;):;) S-~-< ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ;: ::.h1ll;;:J 0 :;)1JeCi"S-:;);:: CO> ~:;)o~Q.~.:;)llIf:::i<'> .... .... :::r ..... CD-l:>. ~ ~. III rho CD 5' III ~ =" '"=:c:::~ Q..Q't)......~~ 't)QlCDCD trC:a).~. CD :;) ~ Q. "<: 9:'tJ :;) cs: :;) ~~;~ ~c2~~~~ :;)00l1ll ~IlI(1).Ql CD !!..o~~ ~~:::J3:0'~ 5'~ ~ ~ ~ Ql ~ 5' ~ g """....,(5CD :;)3~:;)CD S~o~ CQS'C:(l\C9,::! CD' '"=: <:) 0 0" CQ ~ ~ ~ III ~1lI't)o o CD'"=: 5'C:1lI~ S-~~ii~o :::!:!S-~'t) <D3{;)'0l~;:: c:rg sr~ ng-Cit~C::::i J> ~ N' CD "<: g - .,... <:) ~ III ~ co ~ Q..&O"~ :;)O"~$o)g.Q. co CD CD tr ..... ~_.....~CQIlI !. "<: 0" 1lI:::r ). :;). :::r oJ" '"=::;) Z .. S- ~g. c:O'CD~ocg!:> <D g.'t) N 9: :::i Q.. Q.. c: a &\) Q. CD!. O'::1ll1o~C: ::J IlItrCl} ~o:;) c:~ 0. c2 ~ g 0' Ill;='cg ~.~ Q. 3C CD 5' 0 't) is: a CQ 't) 0 c ~ CD 5' 0 :::r ~ c: " ~ CQ ::J o~"",,,~ o:::J~ ~5' 0- c:~c:.... 0'. CD - ~ 5' ~ g CQ ~ Q..o :;) 3: "C Q.. Q...... ::.....,,, .....-. &\) c8 S tr tr ~!!t .... 0' 5 ~.. ,CD"<:~ ::rs~ .....CD ~ S 5' 0 CD Q. :::r ~ iiCDCD....~ <Dg ..... ~ S III ).Ql CD Q. ~ <D rh''t) :;) 00::: _.1lI -. 0 0 ~ ;c2~ ~Ill~ ~S oJ"CD:::r oQ.S. nO <D a rho 0 '~ (Q 0 ~ 1lIC:~ ~CQ c:~ ~~ii ~CDg :;)~ o Q. Ci CD a ~ rho ~c85' ~~S-).Ci ..... . ;:;: CD C::::i o 0 III :::r Q. 't) 9::::J' ....~O' S-o~ O'CQ !!tlll~ CDCQ~ ~::;: CD -g III ~ g rh' o~. ~a:8 ~s~ ~s .....'<(1) -.(1)< Os ~O'"O c2'tJ ~ .CD (I) .... .... at ::.:::r III ~ ji: tr !I? .g ..... 0 ~trCD CQ(I)IlI SO (5;:::: :;):::"0 (l)C: '~O" Ill~- :;) ~5'S a' l ~~ 5' ~ (I) $ 51 '<' 5.. c: . ~ ~ ~ Ii rh' :s ::t ~ ~.:;)~ ~.~~ g~ c2~~ c2~CD ~5' !\) z o ~ 'P. ~ 9 3 CD 'tI :r o ::J ~ OJ c CI) 5" CD CI) CI) 'tI :r o ::J ~ o o 0' ~ i t:I "0 ~ .. ~ i c a CD o - z o - =. () &\) - 0- ? i ... i i: i it z &\) 3 CD o - ~ ::J CD ~ 3: c ::J 0- "C !!. ~ (") &\) CI) CD :!! CD z !:> a OJ m o o 3: 'tI r ~ C ~ -f ::J: m 'tI ~ m o " " o m :0 o :0 J> Zn3C J> r- o o Z -f :0 o r- o " :!! o m :0 .~ ..... CD co co o )> z )>C> zm o :xJ . SO oC: 0(J) Co Zo -:;! C> 3C_ zZ zo m 00 Om ~z -t :xJ m " o :xJ -t J> ::J ::J C !!. " CD CD .,. II.) CII o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NO. R A RESOLUTION DECLARING A DOG OWNED BY DANIEL KLICK, 3061 - 142ND LANE N.W., A BITING DOG UNDER THE TERMS OF ORDINANCE NO. 53. WHEREAS, a dog owned by Daniel Klick did on several occasions attack another domestic animal; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance 53, the matter was brought before the City Council; and WHEREAS, after careful consideration the City Council has determined that the dog should be declared a biting dog. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby declare the dog owned by Daniel Klick of 3061 - 142nd Lane N.W. to be a "biting dog". Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1989. CITY OF ANDOVER Attest: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7. lqaq ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT FOR AGENDA SECTION NO. Engineering ~-1* ITEM NO. Amend Uniform street Light polic Todd J. H BY: The City Council is requested to approve the amended street lighting policy. Attached is the current street lighting policy and the proposed (amended) street lighting policy. If you have any questions regarding the proposed (amended) street lighting policy, please contact me. COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY MOTION BY o TO ANDOVER UNIFORM STREET LIGHT POLICY O The City has adopted a uniform street lighting policy utilizing high press~re sodium (HPS) lighting fixtures. These fixtures should be used in the interest of energy conservation and efficiency. In areas that are served by overhead facilities, the lights should be mounted on existing or new poles at a minimum of 21 feet over the roadway using the following standards: (SEE EXHIBIT "A") A) Major thoroughfares, i.e., county road intersections, a 250 watt HPS mounted on a 18 foot mastarm. B) Residential intersections on county roads, a 150 watt HPS mounted on an 18 foot mastarm. C) Residential intersections, a 100 watt HPS mounted on an 8 foot mastarm. D) Residential midblock lights, a 100 watt HPS mounted on an 8 foot mastarm. In areas that are served by underground facilities, the allowed standards are as follows: (SEE EXHIBIT "B") E) Where a city street intersects with a city street: 1. A 30-foot wood pole with a 100 watt HPS fixture mounted on an 8-foot mastarm may be used. (25' mounting heights) 2. A 23-foot black fiberglass decorative pole with a 100 watt HPS fixture may be used. F) Where a city street intersects with a county road: 1. A 30-foot wood pole with a 150 watt HPS fixture mounted on an 18-foot mastarm may be used. 2. A 23-foot black fiberglass decorative pole with a 150 watt HPS fixture may be used instead of the overhead facility. DESIGN CRITERIA: Lights in urban residential areas will be installed on intersections, cul-de-sacs and midblock spacing of 300 feet or as close as possible to 300 feet. Lights in rural residential areas will be installed on intersections, cul-de-sacs and midblock spacing of 600 feet or as close as possible to 600 feet. o Anoka Electric Cooperative will coordinate and layout lights on all plats after being requested and approved by the City of Andover Engineering Department. CHARGES: o In all subdivisions the charges shall be calculated as follows: the total costs from the utility, i.e., installation, facilities and energy charges multiplied by the number of lights and divided by the number of lots in the subdivision. This charge, plus an administra- tion fee, shall be billed on a quarterly basis in the urban serviced rea and bill annually in the rural area to each lot owner of record or occupant of each home. The following comments shall be included as part of the restrictive covenants for all plats. In the event that the City of Andover, Minnesota decides to bill the property owners within system, each lot owner shall promptly pay such charges as required by the City. Enforcement of the payment of such charges may be made by the Declarant or the City notwithstanding any law to the contrary. UTILITY BILLING: Anoka Electric Cooperative will bill the City of Andover on a quarterly basis for all charges. CITY PARK LIGHTING: City Park lighting shall adhere to these standards as closely as possible, recognizing that under certain conditions that mercury vapor lighting may be more desirable depending on functions. The City Engineer shall determine the type of lighting required for park purposes. NEIGHBORHOODS DESIRING STREET LIGHTS: All subdivisions (urban and rural) are required to petition for street lighting. A petition with 51% in favor of street lighting for that particular subdivision or neighborhood the City Council could approve the installation of street lights. All subdivisions (urban and rural) platted on or after April 21, 1988, the installation/capital cost of the street lights in these subdivisions will be borne by the developer and paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative. o ~ .. - o . i. , I 10 I I i "fff""e~ l.c:7- '"", e.. . ~ /A1lR./E"fo/t ) ANDOVER UNIFORM STREET The city has adopted a uniform street lighting policy utilizing high pressure sodium (BPS) lighting fixtures. These fixtures should be used in the interest of energy conservation and efficiency. In areas that are served by overhead facilities, the light~ should be mounted on existing or new poles at a minimum of 21 feet over the roadway using the following standards: (SEE EXHIBIT A) A) Major thoroughfares, i.e., county road intersections, a 250 watt HPS mounted on a 18 foot mastarm. B) Residential intersections on county roads, a 150 watt HPS mounted on an 18 foot mastarm. ' C) Residential intersections, a 1~0 watt HPS mounted on an 8 foot mastarm. D) Residential midblock lights, a 100 watt HPS mounted on an 8 foot mastarm. In areas that are served by underground facilities, the two standards that are allowed: (SEE EXHIBIT "B") E) 30 foot wood poles with a 100 watt HPS fixture mounted on an 8 foot mastarms. (25' mounting heights) , DESIGN CRITERIA: Lights in urban. residential areas will be installed on intersections, cul-de-sacs and midblock spacing of 300 feet or as close a& possible to 300 feet. (SEE EXHIBIT "C") Lights in rural residential areas will be installed on intersections, cul-de-sacs and midblock spacing of 600 feet or as close as possible to 600 feet. Anoka Electric Cooperative will coordinate and layout lights on all plats after being requested and approved by the City of Andover Engineering Department. .,.,;_.:.;.;;...",~L.~......~~;""..':"';':.'_..;."""..,.",,,-^."...~ .......;~.,,__....'.. ~ . , . . -,,;.- ......",',: . .,. ~,_,_..__~,"""';"""'_M'oi...o..J..........-w~..~. o CHARGES: In all subdivisions the charges shall be calculated as follows: the total costs from the utility, i.e., energy and monthly facilities charges multiplied by the number of lights and divided by the number of lots in the subdivision. This charge, plus a 1% administration fee, shall be billed on a quarterly basis to each lot owner of record or occupant of each home. The following comments shall be included as part of the restrictive covenants for .all plats. In the event that the City of Andover, Minnesota decides to bill the property owners within for the operation and maintenance cost of the street lighting system, each lot owner shall promptly pay such charges as required by the City. Enforcement of the payment of such charges may be made by the Declarant or the City notwithstanding any law to the contrary. UTILITY BILLING: Anoka Electric Cooperative will bill the City of Andover on a quarterly basis for all charges. CITY PARK LIGHTING City Park lighting shall adhere to these standards as closely as possible, recognizing that under certain conditions that mercury vapor lighting may~e more desirable depending on functions. The City Engineer shall determine the type of lighting required for park purposed. -, o 1~1tr ~~, '~".W. '~7',,~, '{;-,... ....:.:. ':-.::", ._._,- ;':"": ........ .:~~~' ';:";'. .. I~~';'".;';' '".~,~ .'... '?#.:.(: ~-~. ;0:':: ".C ~~;,:~ "fiJ ' ~-;~X~ i ~(<',1O- ~",):,' 0 ! 1,~'- c: ; ',- t : ;:":'1: 0 tP. ; ':--~- ~'""O'11 . : .tJ\ '(: u O' ...:...,.-.... .. -. . ;.~si:..~~,:;;.<, ;-.. \]I ()- ~ o o -t) -,l'':':~~'' '~~~-~'.' .....,.... ~i .~~~..::~~.~~ .'- L,.".,' f ',',. :4 ~ "._ ,I i j ..---.'------'---..,.~....,.."."..~"~i~~~~fjt~~ .... . : ,':'. :''..' , ", \", ~ ;l;. N .... ," q .), ~. y r~~p;~-.,-: ,;, " "'..- '~~ .,: ." .' - '.. ~ . '.. '.... . .. .;.- :? " 'U'. o ' .. " C':..,:r .(1':';:'" ; ~ t)J - OJ ~ (\ ~ " .- va ~ ... ~ V\ '" CP F.i ." :r Q ,;; ~ = c.~ ( ,- h.......__...."<;~,,- :,; .....; :....~-:.,;~- :~.,...:~\.!::!:::~., ": ... .... --:",-';";'''':'. '.~ ." . " . ~ .".'~-_.- .,-.....--.- ......"...: .. :~~ '1 _. ,_, .~:. '_'", .' " -":~f.:F;;~~:t~~r~;;;:i~~~;i;;~;;;:~.-::';;~:" .'- ;-;..., .~ ,-...., -- .. _.'--,.......~. .~..,~*',:'~.:.:..::.. .... ., f'--' .- 0, ~ !;: ~ ;Jl o 0' r--- ~ I o (") l!. .'f:j:..;.:.~~.~,-~.. '.', !r . ,'"....-. .-,',:: .....~.'.:."'l !'~tfll - .'-: '::; .. .~: " ..". .' i'" ",'-,", .- ." ": .(./ j, :' '.".~:' .'-'~~~~~~~~J2:~b~:;~ . , '. .. .- --~O'. . .;;:~.c;~~.fi2:~~~~'~~f.i~i~~;~~{,~'~i~~~~~f#;.:~:f~?:;~:~;",.. ~~~!hr;j,: -. - """~"""~ : ,.:':",;." ",.. . r..,.,- ,..~_." :,..:..',', ;~.',' ',.. ~ :,.',.. '~, ~ ~ :0" f{fl. -f. ~~,:~::~. ... ifJ"~~f{;f~~~I~j1~}'~", _ O "-'~... ~"""'" _'.. '....., , "I~' ',:: :,.",.,.. '"::":L -:::.c, ':-"., tW-. ' " ,., a .. .., g .. ~"~'~' . . ....~ . . . '. ".~ . " . . '. . . . . ., . . ,. . " . " . . . . , , . . .' ---,........- ..~. .. ....:- " 'le', " .. ~ ~-_._._- ---.....-- ", ,,' .....-~--., r------------ ----....,.-.. All,., ' 'II /I Y . II \1 L _______ ' II Jt _____ -"----- . ------; II d II -----1;----- ~-------- . ...:.-....=:...- ~... -." -;7' ---... ; I ": I "'0 C :s o c3 ........... .~..., " , " ~ .. f.:.. I. i \, ~ ,. .I.. _--: \ '. .... : :;): . ': 'r .,. '. "," .: !.~ .. , r:~: ;:J.:::~;:f.~;::: ~~t '. '. :,~: .~:~.':;:::.: ;:; '. .- ;:"..; -~.:." _,,'f.. -.. .-.<-;::.~):-:.:~:~. .5::~_~;'l~;:;~~~~;(:.;,;. .. . :..:.i~':7:~~~. ~:.~ i;. ^ , .' ....;..:... '." . ;.:.~. ,.::. .";.. " .-;.- " ~ -. ~. .,... .... ~~.~.~,;.;:IF.~ ': . :.,. .0'.. .~..:':~:.:~~.. ""-::"; .'~ u_' .., ...~_:.~.:....- . :~:.:;- ::. ..-... -..,. ... ..... t; i4 ~ o 'U r4 al o o IJ\ '^ dJ aI. Z3 ~ - IJ.. - - '" no ']: o 9. .;c,);:~;~~~~,~i~~1 _._.... o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7. 1 qAq AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ~T5.M Order Street Lights ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering /(1~ BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to review and approve the list of possible street light locations within the City of Andover. 1. 7th Avenue (CSAH 7) & 148th Lane NW 2. Prairie Road & 148th Lane NW 3. Bunker Lake Blvd. & Underclift Street NW 4. Bunker Lake Blvd. & Verdin street NW 5. Bunker Lake Boulevard & Jay Street NW 6. Hanson Boulevard & 177th Avenue NW 7. Verdin Street NW (Co. Rd. 59) & 180th Avenue NW 8. Verdin Street NW (Co. Rd. 59) & 179th Avenue NW 9. Verdin street NW (Co. Rd. 59) & 175th Lane NW 10. 157th Avenue NW (CSAH 20) & Tulip Street NW 11. 157th Avenue NW (CSAH 20) & Dakotah Street NW 12. 157th Avenue NW (CSAH 20) & Quay Street NW 13. 161st Avenue NW (CSAH 20) & Uplander street NW 14. 161st Avenue NW (CSAH 20) & Swallow Street NW 15. 161st Avenue NW (CSAH 20) & Quinn Street NW 16. Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH 9) & 162nd Lane NW 17. Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH 9) & 164th Avenue NW 18. Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH 9) & 164th Lane NW 19. Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH 9) & 168th Lane NW 20. Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH 9) & 176th Lane NW 21. Tulip Street NW & 169th Lane NW 22. Tulip Street NW & 172nd Avenue NW 23. Tulip Street NW & 172nd Lane NW 24. Tulip Street NW & 174th Avenue NW 25. Valley Drive (Co. Rd. 58) & 169th Lane NW 26. Valley Drive (Co. Rd. 58) & Genie Drive 27. Valley Drive (Co. Rd. 58) & Fox Street NW 28. 181st Avenue NW (Co. Rd. 58) & Tamarack Street NW 29. 177th Avenue NW (Co. Rd. 58) & Flintwood Street NW MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Ordinance 29 NO. Pine Bark Beetles DATE February 7, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning Jay Blake, Plann~ BY: AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items The city Council is requested to review the following amendment to Ordinance #29 (Diseased Tree Ordinance) The Amendment adds pine trees infested with Pine Bark beetles to the list of diseased trees. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the item with Tree Inspector, Ray Sowada. This is part of a two tiered approach which includes education and enforcement. The City will continue to education through the City newsletter and mailings. The enforcement of the removal diseased trees will be required to prevent the further spread of the beetle. Please review the enclosed ordinance amendment. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY / ~ STATE OF ; :/ [f:[] (f::[] [g ~ @ iY ~ ,0 DEPARTMENT '-' )'U OF NATURAL RESOURCES ~; Forest Pest Infornation Sheet 88-5 Pine Bark Beet~e (Ios oini) Hosts: A~~ Pines. most common~y red and jack pines Li~e Cyc~e: norma~~y 2 generations per year, ~ong, warm summers may have three generations. '1' ~~"~ Eggs: Laid in ga~~eries in the bark, 1" generation in May, 2~. in ear~y Ju~y (or 1 in May, 2 in ~ate June, 3 in mid Ju~y) 1'" Larvae: sma~~ white grubs, 2-3 millimeters long: hatch ~rom eggs in 7-10 days, ~eed on inner' bark ~or 2-3 weeks, gallery about 4-5 centimeters ~ong, winding \1 ! Pupae: White, point~d abdomens, ~irst generation pupates in mid June, second generation in early August (or 1 in ~ate May, 2 in early July, and 3 in early August), pupation in oval chambers in the bark Adults: Small'dark brown to black beetles, about a quarter inch long: emerge ~rom bark by chewing pin-head sized holes at high densities (50-200 per sq.~t.). Fly to nearby live or ~resh dead trees. Males attack ~irst, ~orm mating chamber, release pheromone which draws ~emales. Each male has 3-7 ~emales, ~emales exckvate 2-3 inch long gallery to lay eggs with the help o~ the male. Last generation' adults overwinter in the du~~ and needles on the,ground. Ii '- Problems: Bark beetles become problems when harvesting operations take place during the growing season or w~ere ~resh logs are piled in ~orest areas. Winter harvesting should end by March 1 (January 1 is better particularly in southern areas) and should not begin until a~ter August 1 (September 1 is better) to prevent build up o~ beetle populations in the slash. Popu~ation control: Cu~tural contro~ by maintaining we~l thinned stands is the best ~or the prevention o~ outbreaks. This maximizes the pitch response o~'the individual trees in the stand. Pitch is the main natural de~ense. Trap Trees can be used to capture and destroy many adults. Selected trees (about 5 per acre) are cut in April, in~ested in May, and destroyed by burning, chipping or burying during the ~irst week in June. This should lower the adult popu~ation to tolerable levels. Pheromone'traps can be used to trap large numbers of adults just like~ap :t:rees, but operate throughout the entire season, require no attention during the season, and do not 'require the sacri~ice o~ valuable timber. Preliminary work indicates they protect the stand as well as trap trees. c:> Chemical control is not, advised for the control o~ bark beetles. T. Eiber, Insect and Disease Specialist, Brainerd July 1988 o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission January 10, 1989 Meeting Minutes Page Four MOTION was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Bernard, that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit by Northwestern Bell (US West) for the construction of two public utility buildings. Building #1 to be located on Lot 7, Block 3, Red Oaks Manor, 5th Addition. auilding #2 to be located at the junction of 139th Avenue NW and County Road 18. Buildings to be constructed will be for the purpose of housing telephone technology and cables. A public hearing was held and there was no opposition. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. It will not cause traffic congestion or hazards., It will not seriously depreciate surrounding property values. It is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan. The design of the buildings shall also conform with the standards of Ordinance 19, State Building Code, and Ordinance 78, Commercial Building Construction. No overnight parking shall be allowed on the property and sufficient exterior lighting to be provided. The landscaping plan shall be approved by the Andover Review Committee. The finalized lease on Building #2 is to be filed with the City and the County prior to final adoption of the Special Use Permit. No Northwestern Bell (US West) employees shall be permanently located at these buildings. There was discussion on the Motion. Ms. Bosell recommended referencing the Ordinance 8, Section 7.03 Special Uses - in all districts public utilities structures or uses except when connected in a public right of way. The maker of the motion approved this addition to the motion. All voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. This item will go to the City Council on January 17th. PINE BARK BEETLES ORDINANCE 29 Mr. Ray Sowada, was present to discuss this item. Mr. Sowada has seen about 12 different areas in Andover where this pine bark beetle is totally wiping out the trees. Commissioner Bernard felt that the best action that could be taken is to first educate the residents of the City, and after that is done, enforcement procedures could be taken. o 4:) Andover Planning and Zoning Commission January 10, 1989 Meeting Minutes Page Five Commissioner Bernard also stated that there are seminars that could be provided for people who have lost these trees, as to instruct people on what other trees could be planted in their place. Ms. Bosell suggested that a flyer could be prepared for the newsletter to be inserted just to attract the community's attention and begin addressing this problem. Commissioner Vistad suggested, if City funding permitted, to assist residents in removing these diseased trees to an approved dump site. Mr. Vistad felt that if the City of Andover could preserve as many of these trees as possible, it would be a great asset to the City. Mr. Vistad also recommended, in revising the Ordinance 29 that it should be changed to add "all diseased trees" instead of just naming dutch elm, oak wilt or pine bark beetles. Ms. Bosell felt that the Ordinance should reflect the specific diseases currently found and didn't feel the City should legislate for future calamities. Ms. Bosell asked if this ordinance included a provision to enable Mr. Sowada to enforce it. Jay Blake stated that the ordinance states that if there is imminent danger to the property values and the health and welfare of the community, the Forester would have the authority to enforce the ordinance. MOTION was made by Commissioner Vistad, seconded by Commissioner Bernard that the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Ordinance 29 with the revised wording to include the prevention of the spread of pine bark beetles within the City of Andover, as written and presented. All voted yes. Motion carried unanimously. This item will go to the City Council on February 7, 1989. The Planning Commis.ion recessed at 9:10 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:20 p.m. o o ,0 ,. Regular Planning Commission Meeting November 22, 1988 - Minutes Page 4 Chairman Perry suggested having some wording that it's a vehicle designated by medical professionals for the use of physically handicapped individuals. ' This item was continued to the next meeting. Diseased Tree Ordinance Mr. Blake noted that he, Bill Bernard and Ray Sowada were at a meeting regarding the pines in our area and what is happening to them. His impression was that we have another tough year ahead of us. There are two methods to get rid of the beetles. One is to water the trees and the other is a trap that gives off a scent, attracts the beetles and the beetles go in the trap and die. The traps are between $30 and $40 each. As far as the ordinance, Ray Sowada has some concerns that he wants addressed. Mr. Blake wanted to find out if Ray could go out and issue citations. Ms. Perry noted that the language is in place for him to get rid of the nuisance. Ms_ Bosell suggested asking the Council if they want Mr. Sowada to have the power to issue citations. Jay will request Ray Sowada to come to a work session to discuss this with the Planning Commmission. Ms. Perry asked if we cold add to the existing ordinance a section that would prohibit the trimming of oak trees by public utilities during the critical times. Commissioner Bernard felt that they could put pine tar on the cuts and that way they could cut the trees when their schedule permits. planner's Report Mr. Blake explained that we have been working to get something done with the Commercial Park. There are two businesses open now and a woman has an option on two lots for a medical office building. street lighting in the commercial park has been approved by the city but has not been installed as yet. Also, the Council has decided that rather than listing the properties with one real estate company, they are going to open it up to a percentage sales commission. The Planning Commission budget for 1989 was increased by 4%. Mr. Blake noted that there is money in that budget for conferences, meetings, etc. Next year, we are going to introduce a new budget ~or economic development. ~... .... ._~. ,_ ....._."..._. .:,....~. ._.'".,,_': '.~ ......-'..".......::;........:_..r ,.... '~U' ...'_~.~_.....,.."". .. o Andover Planning and Zoning Commission October 25, 1988 Meeting Minutes Page Eleven APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Commissioner Pease, seconded by Commissioner Jacobson to approve the minutes of the October 4,. 1988 Special Meeting. All voted yes, with Mr. Vistad - present. Motion carried. The minutes from the October 11, 1988 had the following corrections: Jay Blake stated that on page 7, the minutes should read that this item will go to city council on October 18th. Ms. Bosell stated that on page 2, paragraph 8, it refers to 1981, and it should read 1980. Mr. Jacobson stated that on page 1, that the minutes were approved for October 11, 1988, and should read September 27th. Ms. Bosell stated. that on page 2, paragraph 8, should be changed to read on the west, (not in the west). On page 3, paragraph 4, it should read," Todd Haas requested that the Planning Commission table this item." A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Vistad, to approve the minutes from the October 11, 1988 meeting. All voted yes, Chairman Perry - present. Motion carried. New Business Commissioner Bernard had a concern regarding the beetle attacking the red pine trees in the City and wondered if there's something the City could do with this problem. Commissioner Perry suggested that the City could publicize this issue to the residents. An article could be put in the newsletter also. It was suggested that Jay take a look at the existing ordinance and see if any additional verbage could be added to address this situation. Next Re~ular Meetin~ This meeting is scheduled for November 8, at 8:01 p.m. .":'7..,-..,.... -, ,. ,-."....,.,.....~.... ..,., ''"."- o ORDINANCE NO. 29 ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CONTROL AND PREVENTION OF DUTCH ELM AND OAK WILT DISEASE AND SPREAD OF PINE BARK BEETLES WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. SECTION 1,. The City of Andover ordains: SECTION 2. Declaration of Policy. The City Council of Andover has determined that the health of the elm, line and oak trees within the City limits are threatened by fata diseases known as Dutch Elm diseaseLaa8 Oak Wilt disease and pine bark beetles (Ips Pini). It has further determined that the loss of Elm and OaK and Pine trees growing upon public and private property would substantially depreciate the value of property within the City, and impair the safety, good order, general welfare and convenience of the public. It is declared to be the intention of the Council to control and prevent the spread of these diseases and this Ordinance is enacted for that purpose. SECTION 3. Forester. Subd. 1. Position Created The position of Forester is hereby created within the City. subd. 2. Duties of Forester. It is the duty of the forester to coordinate under the direction and control of the Council, all activities of the municipality relating to the control and prevention of Dutch Elm and Oak Wilt diseases and the spread of the pine bark (IaS Pini) Beetle. The Forester shall recommend to the Council the etails of a program adopted by the Council. SECTION 4. 9~~eA-Blm-aa8-eak-W~1~ Diseased Tree Program. Subd. 1. It is the intention of the City of Andover to conduct a program of plant pest control pursuant to all the powers of this municipal corporation including the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 1974, Section 18.023. This program is directed specifically at the control and elimination of Dutch Elm and Oak wilt disease fungus,aa8 elm and pine bark beetles and is undertaken at the recommendation of ~ Commissioner of Agriculture and the Council in the conduct of this program. o SECTION 5. Nuisances Declared. things are public nuisances whenever City of Andover. A. Any living or standing elm tree or part thereof infected to any degree with the Dutch Elm disease fungus Ceratocystis Ulmi (Buisman) Moreau or which harbors any of the elm bark beetles ~colytus Multistriatus (Eichh.) or Hylungopinus Rufipes (Marsh). Subd. 1. The following they may be found within the o Page 2 Ordinance #29 B. Any dead elm tree or part thereof, including logs, branches, stumps, firewood or other elm material from which the bark has not been removed and burned or sprayed with an effective elm bark beetle insecticide. (29A, 11-6-79) C. Any living or standing northern red oak, Quercus Rubra, northern pin oak, Quercus Ellipsoidalis, black oak, Quercus velutina, and scarlet oak, Quercus Coccinea or part thereof infected to any degree with the oak wilt disease Ceratocystis Fagacearum. D. Any dead oak tree or part thereof including logs, branches, stumps, firewood or other oak material from which the bark has not been removed. part Subd. 2. Abatement. It is unlawful for any person to permit any public 'nuisance as defined in subdivision 1 to remain on any premises owned or controlled by him within the City of Andover. Such nuisances may be abated in the manner prescribed by this Ordinance. SECTION 6. Ins ection and Investi ation. Subd. 1. Annual ~ection. The Forester S a lnspect a premises and places Wlt in the City of Andover as often as practicable to determine whether any condition described in Section 5 of this ordinance exists thereon. He shall investigate all reported incidents of infestation by Dutch Elm fungus, elm or pine bark beetles or Oak wilt fungus. Subd. 2. Entry on Private Premises. The Forester or duly authorized agents may enter upon private premises at any reasonable time for the purpose of carrying out any of the duties assigned to him under this ordinance. Subd. 3. Diagnosis. The Forester shall, upon finding conditions indicating Dutch Elm or Oak Wilt or vine bark beetle infestations, immediately send appropriate speclmans or samples to the Commissioner of Agriculture for analysis, or take such other steps for diagnosis as may be recommended by the Commissioner. Except as provided in Section 8 no action to remove infected trees or wood shall be taken until positive diagnosis of the disease has been made. o SECTION 7. Abatement of Dutch Elm or Oak Wilt Disease or Pine Bark Beetle Nuisances. o Page 3 Ordinance 29 Subd. 1. In abating the nuisances defined in Section 5, the Forester shall cause the infected tree or wood to be sprayed, removed, burned or otherwise effectively treated so as to destroy and prevent as fully as possible the spread of Dutch Elm or Oak Wilt disease fungus or elm or pine bark beetles. Such abatement procedures shall be carried out in accordance with current technical and expert opinions and plans as may be designed by the Commissioner of Agriculture. SECTION 8. Procedure for Removal of Infected Trees and Wood. Subd. 1. Whenever the Forester finds with reasonable certainty that the infestation defined in Section 5 exists in any tree or wood in any public or private place in the City, he shall proceed as follows: A. If the Forester finds that the danger of infestation of other elm, pine or oak trees is not imminent because of ---------- dormancy, he shall make a written report of his findings to the Council, which shall proceed by (1) abating the nuisance as a public improvement under Minnesota Statutes Ch. 429 or (2) abating the nuisance as provided in Subd. 2 of this Section. B. If the Forester finds that danger of infestation of other elm, pine or oak trees is imminent, he shall notify the abutting property owner by certified mail that the nuisance will be abated within a specified time, not less than 5 days from the time of mailing of such notice. The Forester shall immediately report such action to the Council and after the expiration of the time limited by the notice he may abate the nuisance. Subd. 2. Upon receipt of the Forester's report required by Subd. 1, part A, the Council shall by resolution order the nuisance abated. Before action is taken on such resolution, the Council shall publish notice of its intention to meet to consider taking action to abate the nuisance. This notice shall be mailed to affected property owners and published once no less than one week prior to such meeting. The notice shall state the time and place of the meeting, the streets affected, action proposed, the estimated cost of the abatement, and the proposed bases of assessment, if any, of costs. o At such hearing or adjournment thereof, the Council shall hear property owners with reference to the scope and desirability of the proposed project. The Council shall thereafter adopt a resolution confirming the original resolution with such modifications as it considers desirable and provide for the doing of the work by day labor or by contract. o Page 4 Ordinance 29 Subd. 3. The Forester shall ke~p a record of the costs of abatement. done under this Section and shall report monthly to the city Clerk (or other appropriate officer) all work done for which assessments are to be made stating and certifying the description of the land, lots, parcels involved and the amount chargeable to each. Subd. 4. On or before September 1 of each year the clerk shall list the total unpaid charges for each abatement against each separate lot or parcel to which they are attributable under this ordinance. The Council may then spread the charges or any portion thereof against the property involved as a special assessment under Minnesota Statutes Sec. 429.101 and other pertinent statutes for certification to the county auditor and collection the following year along with current taxes. SECTION 9. Spraying Trees. Subd. 1. Whenever the Forester determines that any elm or oak tree or elm or oak wood within the City is infected with Dutch Elm or Oak Wilt fungus, he may spray or treat all nearby high value elm or oak trees, with an effective bark beetle destroying concentrate or fungicide or both. Activities authorized by this Section shall be conducted in accordance with technical and expert opinions and plans of the Commissioner of Agriculture and under the supervision of the Commissioner and his agents whenever possible. Subd. 2. All provisions of Section 8 apply to spraying and treatment operations conducted under this Section. SECTION 10. Transporting Elm or Oak Wood Prohibited. Subd. 1. It is unlawful for any person to transport within the City any bark-bearing elm or oak wood without having obtained a permit from the Forester. The Forester shall grant such permits only when the purposes of this ordinance will be served thereby. SECTION 11. Interference Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to prevent, delay or interfere with the Forester or his designated agents while they are engaged in the performance of duties imposed by this ordinance. o SECTION 12. Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation who violates any section of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine of not to exceed $300.00 or imprisonment for 90 days or both. o o Page 5 Ordinance 29 SECTION 13. This ordinance is effective from and after its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council this day of , 1975. ATTEST: Mayor Clerk . o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 29A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 29, EFFECTIVE JUNE 6, 1975, ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CONTROL AND PREVENTION OF DUTCH ELM AND OAK WILT DISEASE WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No. 29, effective June 6, 1975, entitled An Ordinance Relating to the Control and Prevention of Dutch Elm and Oak Wilt Disease Within the City of Andover is hereby amended as follows: SECTION 5. Nuisances Declared. B. Any dead elm tree or part thereof, stumps, been removed and burned or beetle insecticide, exce t elm wood shall be permltte April 1 of any given year. to Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 19 CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Jerry Windschitl - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk publish: o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Fphrllrl ry 7 '1 QAQ i(S~ APPR"~",,, FOR AGE " // AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discu ITEM Stop Sign Request/ NO. Narcissus & Bunker Lake Blvd. Engineering BY: Todd The City Council is requested to approve a stop sign at the intersection of Narcissus street NW and Bunker Lake Boulevard Service Street. See attached map for location. The Engineering Department recommends a stop sign at this location. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY Irr&, . l' l:L'l . I '\ \ ~I(U AKE.E~~~-; I. I~'t-- 'ff~ .J ::: J11 -"r--...:::. ~/ 1#4 / - -I- .:- LAKE II ~ j. ) I 1 1 , , , 1 L '- , - .:. ~. ... ,- V ~!'-"(a~~/;.(.,~'::~;'''~ ~~- ~..- -- i), ~ ,-. '~i ,~-\t-------~ f~ ~\~, ~B'I\I I N ~ ~_ ~L~. /1\ '\ ~ I~.: o. ;:f1t=K2",~ ! ' '\ ;~REFKHI-:. \r\ H ", ,,~,~~, FS~:TES~ \\ '-; ,-L- "'''':':~ ,. I II II r .~" ~., - .... . oc- ......8._,~.~" ~_-f" ,.:: : I ' ,- ........~ ~,,_\:~ I I I ~ '"'/7t~ ",.. THO"I" '2 ~ . I . . ""II ~" I .....'!'1:.,.,' ~ "c .-'" I ~ tllil> I ,......1.1.1.- ~ C/)i'; " 'I~I': 0';' I5'r~"~ '~~;-".... ~ ~ ,,~~II _ 1'1"'1'1'_ I~ ~ '~ ',:, -'! "'Ij' ~f,f.f.i;';: :: - if l\j~I:if;Na""':'''I'I'' : ~:':Y\.'I :~ ., . I ~ . " ~ J~, d-'5:i .1.1.1.1 I ,.' "J" ; 0, : .. :~ z ~ '~""~iFP: fill.)" ..''f.l;n~: . ~ , ' . :~.:; '~iir.~ " I ,,< : ..,.,'1' : I ~ 1,IfDQ m'{H " ' ,.;i" lY r:::il . ~ f,,' .:::,i:u'~:':, ,t. '''I'i.: I ~ 'g~"I"'" ".,~?, T' ;1' 'fA ;/ ,,", ',.. ';:::: '1" 'rJ~' . .1--------+---+-- ~: i~ . W--: L ,'/ o~i ;::::::"....z ;E.'.l~; ::~ I.P~- (oN ~~~ :.::/ ~_ I ~ ~,~:: "'-=F ItT, . . ,~ """"""'" I -' ~ yfh- Jlffa" I ~- ~~~~ ~~ . $dlfx>I I II ~'" r ' I:-~ ~ ~ .. . _ -:;;;- I.... I ~..~ "'. ~1I.:..' ~ ii '1: fa: ,~.~,I ,__ --= = ". uu;~:-)lTi !,f[f:, '1-1' '. f-J1J -f~H'Dd~ : i~:;~", -j ::\"' -- ~ ~~.#:, h^". ' -,,:, ,~~ 71J.- ~f '1-',,- ; ~ I <I ':f., t ," Iti ~ ~ _':::j_J~ U . :,\. ~ ;;. I.....'. . 'Y-J)I-- ;/, .~ ~ a AND DRAWN FROM OFFICIAL RECORDS '~1"1' . " , . . . . "'.. " , I--- ..... - - sua: $, If} . , . n_ r;iFniTlr $ to "f!/ay!{l :!'\ '. Z', " ~ ~:"",'~~~';-m' i:~.~: ':::: ~ @". 4'., ';'111:';:;+>'" ":l '6i~ ", : ~l~ ~~~ ' I '.. "~E.: ~~ ; ..>:'" p~'A /~', ,~I~L1V\d..J1 ~3"";; ",., 4THI,z ~\ :c.... :Ii~vfl' ~'''II''': , . - n:ffi::( \If<l;] r~n'- . '/' G : , " ~ I 1 '~"I'." .. "II'>, ';M IMITS ~~,II'. 12, '''''' If"/'7\'i=13~ r- CliY Or- C( r------l - '~O - - T r-- /"'i'.... r-""r-I Clu:fy(Jt1Cll IfF' ')111 , ,"',"'-'" ::\ ,,;-;0 :c., .; ~, .." I '/. +--------- I I ":.;. . " ,I , , THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF LAND W. ANDERSON NOKA COUNTY SURVEYOR REGISTRATION NO. 5715 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Februarv 7, FOR AGENDA SECTION NO, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ITEM NO. CCWD WMO Committee Re ort BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to receive the report from the Coon Creek Watershed Reorganization Task Force. We (the task force) have mailed the attached report to each city and to Natalie Steffen and Margaret Langfeld. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY , o DATE: February 3, 1989 TO: Interested Parties FROM: Coon Creek Watershed Reorganization Task Force SUBJECT: Recommendation Re: Reorganization of Coon Creek Watershed Board as Joint Powers Organization Representatives of the communities within the Coon Cr~ek Watershed have met and/or conferred to discuss the merits of potential reorganization of the Coon Creek Watershed Board as a Joint Powers Organization. The group reached the conclusion that the disadvan- tages of reorganization outweigh the advantages and therefore, no steps should be taken at this time to change the present organi- zational structure. Minnesota Statutes create a process under which a watershed board can be abolished and replaced by a joint powers organization. Basically, three steps are necessary. 1. A, petition for diso1ution of the watershed by all cities or towns presently a part of the watershed. 2. Formation of a joint powers organization by all cities or towns within the watershed boundaries. 3. Public hearing and approval of the change by the Board of Water and Soils Resources. In order to authorize the change, that the joint powers organization tion and implement the purposes created. the board would have to find could better manage the opera- for which the watershed was o The committee looked at the advantages and disadvantages of a joint powers organization. The major advantage of a joint powers organization over a watershed board is the direct control the city councils or town boards would have over the board through direct appointment of the board members. Through this control there would be greater accountability to the communities. It has also been suggested that there could be cost savings through a joint powers organization. While this is possible, it might mean merely tranferring some of the functions from paid watershed board members to p,aid city employees. The joint powers organization would also have some financing tools not available to watershed boards. o ~ o February 3, 1989 Page 2 Major disadvantages of joint powers organization would appear to be the potential inability of the joint powers organization to implement projects over the objection of any individual member. Each individual community would have to approve of property taxes for the operations of the organization and would have to approve of any tax or special assessment for any improvement. As watershed improvements, such as detention ponds which benefit one community (as an example, Coon Rapids) may be constructed in another community (Ham Lake), it may be difficult to get the downstream community (Coon Rapids) to agree to be taxed or special assessed for improvements in another community (Ham Lake). In effect, any one community could have veto power over necessary improvements. Any taxes levied by a joint powers organization would be within the levy limit of each individual community. Taxes levied by a statutory watershed board are outside levy limits of each community. There could also be problems in determining a formula for who should pay how much for operations or improvements. In summary, the committee felt the problems, particularly the levy limit problem and the potential veto problem, outweigh the advantages of greater control. The committee felt that there have been problems with the present Coon Creek Watershed Board. These center around reliability, competence, accountability, and responsiveness to citizens. The Watershed Board has taken significant steps to improve this situation. The Board has replaced their attorney and engineer. They have also set up an advisory committee to obtain greater communi ty input. Whi Ie these changes have gone a long way to improving Watershed Board operations, we feel the Watershed Board may also wish to look at establishing its own full-time staff and office, while possibly continuing to purchase outside accounting services. In summary, the committee felt that no change should be made in the organization structure at this time and that the various communities should try to work with the Watershed to improve their operations and should further join with the Watershed Board in supporting legislation which would improve their ability to meet their statutory functions. Respectfully submitted, Don poss, City of Blaine; James E. Schrantz, City of Andover; Bill Ottensmann,; City of Coon Rapids; Thomas Klassen,' Columbus Township; Gary 'Steen, City of Ham Lake o AGENDA SECTION NO. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT 10 Administration ITEM NO. Junkyard License/ Commercial Auto Parts BY: As of Friday, February 3rd, this item is not complete. Hopefully, more information will be available for the meeting. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o ANDOVER 1785 ANDOVER, FIRE DEPARTMENT CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. MINNESOTA 55304 February 7, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ray Sowada, Fire Marshal RE: Commercial Auto Parts License Renewal Inspection The fire lanes are O.K. I checked the storage area east of the office; extinguishers were hanging on the walls. Oxygen and acetylene tanks were chained up to the wall. The paint room metal cabinet. and hanging on was cleaned up and paint cans were all put in a The extinguisher in the paint room was refilled the wall. RS:kt .~~... ..-.....--.~~.......-......,"-."..~-.- o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7, 1989 Engineering R AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. WDE Site Report II BY: James E. Schrantz The MPCA held a meeting January 31, 1989 at 1:30 P.M., to which, I believe, all the Waste Disposal Engineer (WDE) landfill generators were invited. This, of course, included the SW-28 Group. Andover was invited - Mayor Elling attended along with the Hazardous Waste Committee of Ken Orttel and Marge Perry. Ken Haberman of the MPCA advised the group of the plan to have a two party agreement between the generators and MPCA, rather than a 3 party agreement including EPA. The attached letter from the SW-28 Group explains their concerns about leaving EPA out of the agreement. I am sure that without eliminating the EPA issue there will not be an easy solution. There seem to be endless delays in this process. The consent order was signed in 1984. Jim, Ken and Marge can add much more to the discussion of this item. There is a January letter from the PCA to the generators that we do not have. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o ~- --............ C/z r ..)/If':] jf I /1 i vi f ',-trf=.:t1. J.....L , , \ \ / January 25, 1989 Ms. Mary Gade Associate Director, Office of Superfund U. S. EPA 5HS-ll Region V 230 South Dearborn Street chicago, IL 60604 Re: Waste Disposal Enqineerinq, Andover, Minnesota Dear Ms. Gade: This letter is written on behalf of the SW-28 Group in response to your letter dated January 4, 1989, in which United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S. .EPA") directed us to negotiate an agreement with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ("MPCA") to implement the RDfRA. We assume this means that u.s. EPA will not be a party to the RDfRA consent decree or consent order and that U.S. EPA is attempting to withdraw from its obligations under the existing RIfFS Consent Order to negotiate in good faith an agreement to implement the remedial action. (See Administrative Order and Response Order by Consent dated March 21, 1984, hereinafter "RIfFS"). The SW-28 Group represents 14 out of 59 PRPs identified by U.S. EPA and only a fraction of one percent of total waste at the site. U.S. EPA has failed to identify any of the non-industrial PRPs responsible for the remaining waste at the site. o The SW-28 Group, at its inception, recognized that the full cooperation of U.S. EPA, MPCA and the SW-28 Group was neces- sary in order to obtain an agreement to implement a remedy at, this site. It was apparent then that two critical elements were necessary: an acceptable remedy which protects human, health and environment had to be selected and both Agencies had to use their statutory authority and administrative tools to identify addi- tional PRPs and to bring the recalcitrants to che bargaining table. Both elements remain critical. Mary Gade January 25, 1989 c:> Page 2 To this end, the SW-28 Group voluntarily entered into a consent order to perform the remedial investigation/feasibility study with U.S. EPA and MPCA in the early stages of the Superfund Program. We entered into this RI/FS Consent Order with the intent of ultimately resolving any liability we may have with both the federal and state governments with respect to the Waste Disposal Engineering Site. Of significant importance to the SW-28 Group is that the RI/FS Consent Order commits both Agencies to use their powers to identify additional PRPs and to bring them into negotiations for the implementation of the remedy. It further commits all parties to enter into good faith settlement negotiations for implementation of the remedy. A copy of the RI/FS Consent Order is attached for your reference. See paragraphs V and XXIV. At the time we entered into the RI/FS Consent Order, the cost projected for the study was significantly less than $1 million. We encountered numerous delays and cost increases in large part attributable to U.S. EPA. In order to satisfy U.S. EPA, we repeatedly added to the scope and detail of the study. Ultimately the study cost the SW-28 Group in excess of $2 million. Notwithstanding the cost, we believed, until we received your letter, that although the process was difficult, it would lead us to an agreement with both U.S. EPA and MPCA to implement the remedy. The RI/FS Consent Order reflects this intent: NEGOTIATIONS RELATED TO TO REMEDIAL OR REMOVAL ACTIONS It is the intent of the parties to this Consent Order to conduct, upon the completion of the pit RI/FS and the Landfill RIfFS required by this Consent Order, good faith negotiations leading to an agreement to address the implementation of remedial and removal actions approved for the WOE Site. In addition to the requirements of Part V of this Consent order, the U.S. EPA and the MPCA agree to make all reasonable efforts to secure the coopera- tion of all known responsible persons prior to commencing the negotiations described in this Part. RI/FS Consent Order, Paragraph XXIV o Now U.S. EPA apparently desires to walk away from the binding commitment made in theRI/FS Consent Order. . ,', Mary Gade January 25, 1989 Page 3 o We are not prepared to enter into negotiations with MPCA unless we receive the commitment from u.s. EPA to enter into a written agreement providing a broad covenant not to sue and con- tribution protection in exchange for our commitment to implement the remedy under the supervision of MPCA. In addition, U.S. EPA must satisfy its obligations to pursue recalcitrant PRPs and bring them into the settlement. Finally, we request that u.s. EPA assist MPCA in structuring the settlement so that a' meaningful portion of the liability or work remains for the non- settlors. We believe this could be achieved through a form of mixed funding, mixed work or operable units. (For example, Region V has approved mixed funding in a comparable situation in the Marion Bragg Consent Decree). Because U.S. EPA has identified more PRPs than has MPCA and because U.S. EPA has considerable more resources available to it to pursue potential non-settlors and to provide meaningful incentives for PRPs to enter into settlements, it is imperative for U.S. EPA to fulfill its obligations under the RIjFS Consent Order, to use its resources to bring recalcitrant PRPs into the settlement negotiations and to provide a real incentive to settle. MPCA has advised the PRPs that settlement negotiations will begin shortly after a meeting it has scheduled for January 31, 1989. Because of this deadline and the relatively short period for negotiations, we must receive a response from u.s. EPA before negotiations commence. We are available to meet with you and MPCA to discuss resolution of these issues at your earliest convenience. We believe that with some creativity and flexibility of the parties, a satisfactory resolution can be achieved which will lead to an expeditious implementation of the remedy. Very truly yours, SW-28 Co-Chairs (~J(! /C:b",~ Carl C. Meier 41k Honeywell, Inc/IHuL... Honeywell Plaza 2701 4th Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55408 ~~~i-4 A 6:K1ft'~, 'Ma ga et A. Coug lin Dickinson, wright, Moon, Van Dusen & Freeman 800 First National Bldg Detroit, MI 48226 o cc: Gary Pulford Rich Kool Fred R. Bartman SW-28 Group Kenneth M. Haberman Jon S. Feletto Stephan Shakrnan o Agenda WOE Informational Meeting January 31, 1989 Introduction Purpose of Meeting Status of WOE Work (conducted under 1984, Consent Order) RD/RA Negotiation Plans/Schedule Questions/Answers o 10 I '. I 6" ! i 1 o eRA "72- 7<-2'/09/86 GRASS VEGETATED COVER ~1~~@1~~~~~!~~fl~}J{t~~~$f~ SLOPE 3-50/0 3011 .. . .... ..... ................ ..................... .. ..................................... .... .. .. . .... ............................................ . .. .. .. ,.. ., .....,.....,................................................................................................................................................... ;:::;:;:::::::::::::::::::;:;:::::::;:::;:::;:;:::::::::;:::;:;:::::::::;:::::;:::::::::;:;:::::;:;:;:::::::::::::::::::::::;:::;:::::::;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:::::::; :;:::::::::;:::;:::::::::::::::::::::::;:;:;:::::::::;:;:::;:::;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::::::::::;:;:;:;:::::;:;:::;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:::;: ;:::;:::::::::::::::;:::::;:::;:::;:::;:::::;:::;:::;:;:::::;:::;:::;:::;:::::::::::;:;:::::;:::::;:::::::::::;:;:::::;:;:;:::;:::;:::::::::;:;:::;:;:::::;:::: .:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. 1:1:1:1'.1:[::11:1.1':.::['1.:::.::1'11111.1:.:1:1.1:1.1::.1:::\,:::1:.\\1.::111::'\'1'1:::1:1[1'\'1'1.::\1:.::j:1.11[:1.[.:.1'::<::[.:::::.111.:.\1\::::::~ ::::::::H:::::\:::\:::\\\::\::\::::\:\ff::::::::::fff:H::::\::\\i::\f::ff::f:::::\ff::::::::::\H::::\::f::U: :::;: :::: : :::: ~::;:::::;:::::::::::;:::: :::::::::::::;::::::::: ;:::;: : ::: ;:;:::::::::::;:::::: ::::::::::::::: : : : : ::::::::: ::: ; :;;::::;:::;:::::;::: : :;: :: : ::: ;' GEOTEXTlLE FILTER FABRIC 12" T . .:;/<%"X:~!!;~~~0% <,~IEJ~li~g~;?~ ."/ .... " 24" COMPACiEJ Cl. AY :'::'. //'/(<-::';:.<<"'7. ./ '<,:,//. " '/ ., K - I x 10 cm/s" .',.' " ,,' !Jr~lf~il;[,i;;,,~:' ....... ..... ..'i:!s.... . . /;~;~//////.///.'l/0.///./;~/~-:/,//<///.... "/////,'/////u/ .,..,..//.,,//-;/.1."/ //,. ,,' . :/--:,.:'-';-;';/ ',>~' .'~/~.~?h~;:~~.~/-:'~<<;;':/"':/<' X'.~~ ;/~,~ <.~ -:. . . ;/, :"/,.;:'; /~~'" __:-~. : T }~m:~~j;p@1*k~d?f~;~1@:*?~W~(;:;;:;;/.<i~~:<~1;:<::'{~~:; figure 2.4 SCHEMATIC CROSS. SECTION OF LOW PERMEABILITY CAP MEETING RCRA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS WDE 1 Andover, Minnesota 610381.1. o i , g I Ii Z ! e tlig!, I i".~' · ,_Adl,;! ~1"!1;~~" "I li , . ~ .:' ...:::IoltlE3~ I fj ml @ I! I o -4J :~ J ! i l . !: ~~ .. ." ::;; ~g ." ~~ ~ i~ 0 ." I o I '" ~ I m ~ ~ m I ~ ~ II: I U f:: .. !,- (. t . I. I, 0 Cost Estimate for WOE &,sponse l\ct.ions Present Worth Capital Costs O&M Total Present Worth Capping of Site $8,196,500 $235,673 $8,432,173 ($7,359,900) ($2,489,975)* ($9,849,875) Ground Water Extraction ConstJ:uction 812,000 41,478 853,478 (1,082,666) (55,478) (1,138,144) Treatment Cal:bon Treatment 91,000 470,138 561,138 Air Stripping 84,000 44,306 128,306 Disposal Coon Creek NPDES 28,700 381,789 410,489 Slurry Wall With Extraction Well 302,723 86,308 389,031 Site Y.onitorinq 70,000 647,529 717,529 Fillinq of Wetland 3,837 -0- 3,837 Total $9,504,796 $1,862,915 $11,367,675 ($9,022,826) $4,175,523) ($13,070,043 ) * Contingency/Engineering and Site Supervision o o Agenda WOE Infonnational Meeting January 31, 1989 Introduction Purpose of Meeting Status of WOE Work (conducte-'<i under 1984, Consent Order) RD/RA Negotiation Plans/Schedule Questions/Answers o 1 .. I '1 ; I 1 .., , . I '.... ., eRA ,.72-74-2./09/86 GRASS VEGETATED COVER 6" I !~~~~~~~~~~!~;t~~$~~!~;4~ ";";:::;:::;:::;:;:;:;:::;::::::':':':::::::";:;:;:::::;:;:;:::;:::::::::::;:;:::::::::::::::;::;::::;::: :.:.:::::::........::::::::::::: .... ;:;:::;:::;:::::;:;:;:::::::::::::::;:;:::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::;::::';::.:.::.:. ,".:,.;.:.::;:::::::::::;:;:::::;:::::;:;:::::;:': o SLOPE 3-5 % " 'I: 3011 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 12" " "AR~~fil~t~:~G;';I~,lf~w~i~ , fi&'~1~!Tht~!~~~~~r~~I~lDjl~rll 24" :. ,:;:.:/ ; ';;?; :'/;(;;~{:/"'/'//"'~"':".'/':"~;"'.""';.:",,~,:,;,t:';' ' .,;.,.:.,::,;~~/,:;;,.",.:,;,,;,~;,;;;;.,,:,;:,:. '" ... / ,I"" . ': ,::YL.'..,i,'.<::'::" /'.... .,->>:; <;~'?<:':-;"'~'" "//"~'.- " ,':-:;:;',~<~;~};j~ :.-> <-;' '.;: . .>/ .:",".-. /.' COMP:"C7EJ CL AY /./~//,~ -7 ,/. -:.:'/-~. /'. .c/, K ~ Ix 10 cm/s . :;..j>;':-~I/"-: ://, ,,"', ."..'" /';.' .1 ;.?~:. 0/~;/',~/Z-', ' ,?','/ ' '.'.':- /./;X;;.-..., .gy:A{B~;::ji!f.','}~::.~/,;/ '/~;.; ';,.::; ,", L:";/:; < "; : /.~::~~X///,/~/%:</~:~/?:://~-;-.-:,/~ :,:,: >///.~;?'/~:/I///' '..' u/,'/::~/<'.~ /;.,;, /-' /~://:';-:-':/ ,..;'/)/ /;//:/(-<:;:;;:;;:--( ;;'<</:;..:. /'/;:-,,;: ~.{~,~~::;<~~>/.' ~. / '/'.: z../,>>~~,~:' .,..-~.~.-:: T;;~f:{.::~;1!W;:'J,.0{!fiP:;!ft:'~?N:{;ji<::;(;;?;,::<f;/<;/;;;<.:; figure 2.4 SCHEMATIC CROSS. SECTION OF LOW PERMEABILITY CAP MEETING RCRA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS WDE 1 Andover I Minnesota 610391.1 o o I . f .~i IX! · . . < I jH,H ~,t 8 ~ ~ . . a I ~ ~ ! ! ~ ~ g . ~ ~1:1iOf'::! I ~ : 5 3 g i qm/@I i . I: ~ IE ~'il i , ....__.__ I ~ i ! . !:1 ~~ :l- .' .. =:i .g .' - ~~ w ~: i ~ ~ ? o I ." .., I 0> '" '- <5 "- 0> I C ... II: " U ~ ... Cost Estimate for 'WOE Res{X:7nSe Actions 0 Present Worth Capital Costs O&M 'lbtal Present Worth Capping of Site $8,196,500 $235,673 $8,432,173 ($7,359,900) ($2,489,975)* ($9,849,875) Ground Water Extraction Construction 812,000 41,478 853,478 (1,082,666) (55,478) (1,138,144) Treatmant Carbon Treatmant 91,000 470,138 561,138 Air Stripping 84,000 44,306 128,306 Disposal Coon Creek NPDES 28,700 381,789 410,489 Slurry Wall With 'Extraction Well 302,723 86,308 389,031 Site Monitorinq 70,000 647,529 717,529 Fillinq of Wetland 3,837 -0- 3,837 'lbtal $9,504,796 $1,862,915 $11,367,675 ($9,022,826) $4,175,523) ($13,070,043) * Contingency/Engineering and Site Supervision o :; o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Febrll;:) ry 7 1 QAQ APPROV'~KOR AG D'v AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Commission ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administration ITEM NO. Approve Fire Dept. Election Results BY:Vicki Volk The City Council is requested to approve the results 0 Department election as follows: Chief - Bob Palmer Assistant Chief - Glenn Smith Secretary - Maris Schilling MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7, 1989 ITEM Award Bid/Fire Vehicle NO. 13 BY: V. Vo1k AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. Fire Department The City Council is requested to consider awarding the bid for the Fire Chief's vehicle to Item Chevrolet. The following bids were received: Main Motors Suburban 4x4 W/Diese1 engine $19,528.26 21,283.11 Viking Chevrolet Suburban W/diese1 engine $20,105.00 20,755.00 Iten Chevrolet Suburban 4x4 $20,565.00 The bids are attached. Also attached is a memo from the Fire Department Large Equipment Committee recommending the bid from Iten Chevrolet. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY MAIN MOTORS Chevrolet, Cadillac dealers since 1919 = 435 West Main Street. Anoka. Minnesota 55303 = Phone (612) 421-2700 January 13th, 1989 Dear Sirs, Enclosed is our bid for one 1989 Chevrolet Suburban. 3/4 Ton 4x4. Bid: $19,628.26 EQUIPMENT LIST: - Panel Doors - 350 Gas Engine * - 3 Speed Automatic - Silverado Package ( Required for bucket seats ) - Bucket Seats & Console - Quad Shocks - Auto Locking Hubs - Heavy Duty Battery - Block Heater ** - Dual Batteries - 40 Gallon Tank - Sheilds - Center Seat - Air - AM/FM Sterio - 5S Mirrors - Tow Hooks - Heavy Duty Trailer Hitch - Oil Cooler - Transmission Cooler - Power Steering - Power Brakes * 4 speed automatic OVerdrive is not available on 3/4 ton Suburbans. Dual Batteries installed - Need information on harness desired at the time the vehicle is received. ** Thank You, o~c: ( Stephen J. Cracauer Fleet Manager Main Motor Sales Co. SUMMARY SHEET TATED ON THIS BID FORM ION CALLED FOR ON THIS BID FORM MAY BE CAUSE "J \,0 $ /9,,,,6.+ <:l ~ / Option: rI FOR DIESEL ENGINE IN-LIEU OF GAS: . $ rll, 1+ Y.3 / *Bid price shall be less taxes. MAKE (e:? 'j . I I 'r ..., C_ \. <:'..... J .::J.-c~ _ '1..._ .) '-( <"")'''' k.L,dJ r\ .0, '7 y ,( /" :" ., c, 1 I, ,t ". _( ';, MODEL V J-t::, 00 c V ,:2.0'jo Co C ,Zl..U ( DELIVERY /),)"..', ( ; c( ((final delivery date for complete unit) BIDDER SIGN HERE ,,/ /, '-:9" /' '~ ( /...., /' "Iv <--' " ,..-.-' / r ~) (.CL"~ ,.<<LACA,-,"--') /1.1 .i;0 /f.1..-..."\c"" 54( "., (, -. BIDDER'S NAME ADDRESS l{%- I..) /1.-1.,:>, 1"'-' S i J1 , t_ It- ,U () -"14 " , lit ,u 5''''?';) TELEPHONE NO. t!). (-:;1. ,/0 0 STATE WARRANTY -? /.QV'~<2.. )''-;J. 00 <> 1/"'/""'-11"1. 72. (f"'''.A~'(. ~/ <k~ i-J .a-<.Il.......:t 1 ~ (.... /'I- {-r "-;-< .1 ~~ /;Z '.....a,;; o.e, (~ou' "('d(') o . ~-.' ........~,..~.: . . o CITY OF ANDOVER SPECIFICATIONS FOR A 1988 OR 1989 SUBURBAN OR EQUAL 3/4 TON PANEL DOORS 4 WHEEL DRIVE This vehicle shall be a combination of the latest production model as currently advertised meeting the terms of this Specifications, new and complete in all details. Furnish all standard equipment advertised, whether or not specifically called for here, except where optional over standard or conflicting equipment is specified. Shall be V-8 gas 5.7 liter 350 cubic inch displacement. Block heater. J/ ,/ ~ ~ ~ ENGINE: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS BODY: WHEEL BASE: TRANSMISSION: AXLE: AIR FILTER: OIL FILTER: BRAKES: PARKING BRAKES: STEERING: STEERING WHEEL: ALTERNATOR & REGULATOR BATTERY: RADIATOR: o TANK: TIRES: Heavy duty 4 wheel drive Suburban or equal rust proofing, 4 door, back panel door. standard. Heavy duty 4 speed automatic with extra cooling. Front Quad Shock absorbers, Auto locking hub, Leaf springs Front 3800 Ibs Rear 6000 Ibs. ~ V' /' ~ ~ i-/ Dry type air cleaner sized to engine supplied. Full-flow, throwaway type. Heavy duty power brakes. Furnish mechanical parking brake system. Power steering. Heavy duty type. f ~ /05"' f/If.f} v-belt driven alternator not less than 135 amperes with a fully transistorized regulator. 2 heavy duty batteries with battery isolater Battery 1 for vehicle only. Battery 2 with 8 terminal power plug with 60 amps tuse. Heavy duty large capacity radiator with antifreeze at 35 degrees. 40 gallon tank with stone shield. _ '#- fJ/Z leE IIl/iJl..ilPi!s 'tiel/tUrF' E.e ClUE All season radial LT235/85R-16, with spare at LT235/85R-16. ~ ~ ~ .51-1/Etft- GAUGES: GOS: SEATS: INTERIOR: RADIO: PAINT: HORN: ACCESSORIES: /1t Needle gauges indicating oil pressure, temperature, and amps. Light tint for windshield, right & left front doors and rear door windows. Dark tint for rear seat right & left doors and rear panel windows. \..-/ ~ 51t.V~RfJ{JO CQu.JPPEJ) Front custom bucket seats, center seat ~ folding. No third seat. Fully-sound proofed & insulated, red in color, air conditioning in front and heavy duty heater. Manufacturer's standard push button AM-FM radio. Fire Red Solid Paint. Furnish with dual electric horn. The following equipment, along with a complete line of regular equipment, whether or not standard, shall be furnished and installed: 1. Dash mounted gauges: fuel, engine temperature, ammeter, oil pressure, (engine temperature and oil pressure shall be direct reading gauges), and headlight beam indicator, engine warning lights for low oil pressure and high water temperature. 2. Fresh air hot water heater and defroster, largest available~ 3. Heavy duty, dual automatic wipers and dual frost resistant windshield washers. 4. Five (5) safety belts, floor and frame anchored, per SAE Standards ASBI approved all-metal buckle quick detachable type with retractors. 5. Manufacturer's standard turn signals and reflectors are required to meet SAE Class A Standards. Furnish with a simultaneous flashing warning switch, and backup lights. 6. Dual sun visors. 7. Interior and rear view mirrors and stainless steel below eye line outside mirrors. v f} {)'Ii flY! ')jj;Jlf) I v V 5Tf) <::"~D -"I 'S:TD S'T /) STD ~'STD -s1d~~ 7f:~ ~uJ~fWl'~/ o 8. Front and rear bumper only. Tow hooks in front mounted on frame. Heavy duty trailer hitch, Class 3 frame mount receiver type with trailer wire plug. 9. Complete lighting in accordance with National Safety Standards Act and the Minnesota Motor Vehicle and Traffic Laws latest edition. Headlights to be Halogen. 10. Interior dome light in the front, center and back. 11. Inside operated hood release. 4 V" v / V'. BID SUMMARY SHEET BID MUST BE STATED ON THIS BID FORM F~URE TO SUPPLY COMPLETE INFORMATION CALLED FOR ON THIS BID FORM MAY BE CAUSE FOR REJECTION. TOTAL PRICE OF TRUCK $ ~()} JQ5, OCJ + $ $'600 00 Option: FOR DIESEL ENGINE IN-LIEU OF GAS: . *Bid price shall be less taxes. MAKE (l // E !/ /-?IJ L.. /::-T :') f< BC{ P 1319 Al ~qi[.'i d~€ey~Io~:Ute;:'''M~ ~/ 1),1'0 , 9?1t:~~~~~- ING CHEVROLET 71;01 HIGHt" ^., ~- -;J I:: . ~'"' I V...J I FRIDLEY. MN 5543; . MODEL DELIVERY BIDDER SIGN HERE BIDDER'S NAME ADDRESS 0/;) 7J(' blOc) ,"3 (fAAJ /"-0 ~oO ( TELEPHONE NO. STATE WARRANTY /0 Buy.'s Nsm.: M./. , , / ::J /.; -' ~.zJ ~---"- '::::-' b? JJ // II' Co-Buy.r Nam.: ~,;f, './.::) r~ ' Addr.ss /6!iS- ~ ~ '-' r~ ~~~~:~~ /' /l(cJt, Zip ~~';;;:O" Buyer D.L. " Co-Buyer D.L. # YE/ ~ Y9 I-K(7 A;..A~ 1"'(!Y/6 40 t #/ITYP~ 'j', s/6.11/.~ ///h7f'7.1f".t= /8S'/IJ.""'"'9?n "/7/1 COACH # ' R.P.O. CASH PRICE OF VEHICLE I/.,;)-.so.!; FREIGHT c. /0 - L //.~ t? t? ';"dJ ,:;2;;;; - ~~'7 -.._ ::), J? - .:>:~ - "/%/ ~ ::3 .s- - ~7 - .::)S~ - 38- ,;;).o-S- - -?7 " 7e:::r - ibo - /~/ - 7'9 -' ..;:;{~,.. 3:2- .s:> - o Buyer OOB: ,Co-Buyer 008: 'ct. (7~ ~~ :.. , .~ /J~w ?&:. (~ V A'/.ff S..s 7~ :3.' 7.:3 .6"........... t:f.../.// ~J./ / ?f-x.-r<,i.r./ &,'.df A/ -? 4 , /.~ ~ A 1'6, 7 L.-a. c5'J'i:; ......./c .// '" d :-".., .~ r..Jl ';". /;;;".!', ..a::;P'. --.,;j' k L%..o ./~- "l ~ -g /Y.~ '? :<:....,.. './/7/:' ~- " t/'71-- ~ ,4.J/ l>>;r., '~Y., '1.fJ" '1 t6 Ij) "'- J r"" ,,'XC> ~< c3'y fjS my,; IV j:--;; , I](;:D IYt1 ~, :5:3 / L.7:. << , u --. ------ ~9'~ ~ - -. :0. 29 AL HUNTER Truck Specialist ITEN CHEVROLET COMPANY 6701 Brooklyn Blvd., Brooklyn Cenler, MN 550129 Bus: 561.9220 . Res: 424-5441 . ___~_~._ __..y~-"I;".-W I.ISED CO~OR~. IlICENSE' IOELlVEREDON OR.. STAlE IABOUT .1';. I:rOCK d/;:;. -'} t' . :ll'"4,2 ~ ~-r t/,t:?, //'0, _.4 ~~:3.J/7.rP/5 /'YJ1I ,Ll..(';/ 0..... p;. (~A.L---t, _ -'50.J" 77.f ,f!-) ~-p /VL _n - II. ~, l.::3b- ~~ -~~ ~ :..~~ ;;C~~:' -...., , M ~o /.:>7.tl , K~~ ..' I "77J/S ( /,~, ,/ '/-" .:s70c,A-' LOCALLY INSTALLED OPTIONS , , , , " .. , , " ~ . '..,; , /J / ~,/6 ..r Transferor (seller) hereby certifies, to the best of his/her know- ' ledge. that the pollution control system on this vehicle. including , ~, the restricted gesoli":'B pij)e. .has not been removed, altered, or "rendered inoperative.......!. .."7,...~~:'"!1~..:;~. ':' ,;~~!~.,,~~...'~.~i(i~'r~J'!I; '.[ILESS'j\Ll'OWA LIEN HOLDER NAME: LIEN HOLDER ADDRESS: w3f,an\lesonlheVEll~t~:.tIW1seCClhl!ltNtJUbctur".MbetweeI'lYOU theOEAtER)tnCI ~8f.~~~~JATlONFEE ..' 1~~{lhe~8,UY[R~IUltVE~HIClElsbelIlllSOld~..ASIS",..I;amta,"",lIll1etflllr.IISI(as\OI"'lluaHIY~ -I'IF .. nceol the Vf.H1ClE. lU/1lW5tandlll3lYOU eqnsslylll$dWl2lwarra'ltln.ti\Ilere>'(I!'M1Of ..-,:~I ~& EES.,," anyknplledlWllrranlyolmere~labilltyorfilnes'Illl'lparllCU!arpUlposelndlhal~ fSOll to assume 101 YOU any IIabilitr III COllnetliOllWllh . :t-,. TOTAL .:'.' ~affedsll18lelmsdlhemanulact\nllf'S'/\'iframy.. >. ' .... 11 ON THE BACK OF THISCONlRACT. ' ~'SStgll3lur. . ".0318 /-~~-n ~~~~~,~~~i MAt(,E IBODY MODEUTYPE COLOR ISERIAl. VIN IUCENSE NO. LICENSE EXP. DATE INS. CO. NAME POLICY NO. TRADE-IN: IMODEl YR. MllEAG,f TOTAL 2H'C~S"'A"PPRpaS1! TAXABLE AMOUNT TAX ~~$6J SERVICE CONTRACT YES NO ,,2500 I,: I Tfte front "t'd beck 01 thle CONTRACT comp,lse the enli,e CONTRACT aUectlng this pu,chase. The DEALER will not 'Iltognlre eny ve,blllllllg'eement. 0' e"v other eg.eement or undelltlllnding 01 eny newre:~e'IJlY Ihet no crlldil has btIen elttended to me 10. the purchese of this motor VEHICLE eltcept es eppee,sln writing 0" the Isce olthl. CONTRACT. The t~. 01 I CONTRACT w... IIg,eed upon snd lhe CONTRACT .I~ In ltQ .,..hnhlp on 1he d.1e . not.d .1. lop 01 Ihl ctlm. II YOU .,. .n."glngc,edlt 10' ME, thl. CONTRACT I. not v.lld until_ credit IMPORTANT'. I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY BE A BINDING dISCIO.ui~~ed'" d~, d In R.gulsllGn Z end I h.". .cc.pt.d the tledtt '1II111nd,d. ,: . ' CONTRACT AND I MAY LOSE ANY DEPOSITS IF I DO NOT PER- NOTICE OF S SMAN'S 1I 0 AUTHORITY FORM ACCORDING TO ITS TERMS. Accepted....." ..... I, This o.d.,l. n Igned "nd .cc'Plllld bV S.... M.n.g., 0' Ollleer 01 Compan,. Buyer's Signature . - - -..... -~- .. ... ... 7- -------.THiS oDOMETER MilEAoE STATEMENT REfERS TOVEHiCll~ sEiNa soio'~- -.-~-----:-.....----~_. - - -....---\ You ". ,equi by law 10 disc tilth. aClus' odomete' reading lit the lime of t,an,fe'. Any f.lse ,teternent mev make you liebte,'M, civil .nd C'lmlna,1 penalties pursuant to tha Fede"l Motor I Vahlclalnfo,metio ."ings Act and Minneso" Law. 1973 Ch.pll' 264.nd 1977 Chepta, 105. . . .' . , Ilwd ITEN ~VROLET CO. '. the.owntlll.1 of thi. v.Ncle. ce.11~y 1~e ~~N;'elll ~s~cu'rl~y l~t~fllSI~. Werra~t tllle. aulgn the "ehlele end.Ia"ea paid , ..l_ol_-_' ...,;;;;tJ' 10 t~ pe"on(SI~em "'OW .nd state th.t thl odometer on the vlhlcle desc,lbed below now ,esd. . ' , . ,mllellkltomlltels; . CHECK 11J I h".bv teltlf, thst to the belt of my 1r.now~gethe odometsr fIIIsding II st.ted .bo". renects the .ctu.1 mlleaga of the vahlcla desc,ibed below.' . ONE 1211 herebV cerllfv ItllIt to Ihe best 01 my 1r.nowledg'e the odometer reeding a. "at.d .bov. ,.nect. the .mount of mlleege.1n allc", 01 dllligned mechsnlcal.odometer 6mll Q' BOX 99,999 milellkllomalers of the vehle1e described btI10w.' I . ONLY 0 13 hllllebv certily 1hll the besl 01 my wledge the odomele, reading II .teted ebovels not the eclual mllel'ge 01 vehicle described beloW end .hould not be ,.ned upo<'l. ~ SERIAL NUMBER WIN) L1C. EXP. DATE o o 1211 hereby cerllfy tMtthe odometer w.a eltll.ed for ,epal, or ,aplacament purpose. whll. In mv ponenion and tMt th. mlleelle regl.tllled on the lepal'ed o. replacement odometel wa.ldlllflticel to thlt before .uch SIII."lce. . 1311 hereby ca'llly thet the ,epal.ed 01 "plac.ement odomat., waall'lcapabla of ,ellll1er1nO the ume milll.ga. thet It WII ,,,et to .l:ero and that Ihe mllea on I o,lginal odometer 01 odomellll before 'epak was milellkllomele". TRANSFEROR'S ISEllERt STREET ADDRESS 6701 BROOKLYN BLVD. TRANSFEREE'S NAME IBUYER) RRClllpt of copv IIck.nowledl1lld. Trll""'l',"e'" lOuye.' Slgn..,ure Y ....- .-- ....-......- ......-....--. ---'- ------------.--.---.---..----.- -,. -- ----- ~ ANDOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE CHIEF VEHICLE BID INFORMATION Reasons for recommendation of Iten Chevrolet bid. 1. Main Motors did not meet the specifications listed on the bid sheet. 2. Viking Chevrolet meets the specifications but has a delivery date of 90 to 120 days from date of order. \ 3. Iten Chevrolet meets and exceeds all specifications. I, 4. Iten Chevrolet has the vehicle in stock saving a minimum of 90 days till delivery. This would enable us to have the vehicle in service by 1 March 89, freeing the present Chiefs vehicle for use by the Fire Marshal. This would also enable us to have the vehicle in service for the spring grass fire season. 5. The vehicle at Iten Chevrolet includes rear locking differentials which is needed but was left out of the bid. The cost of the differentials is 252.00 dollars. 6. The cost difference between Iten and Viking Chevrolet is 450.00 dollars between the two bids. The bid from Viking does not include the price for the locking differentials. This makes the price difference only 198.00 between the two bids. Respeg,tfully, The ,~ge ,E?c~~" ~/Y2?~ /"/~?;;pt/? /~~ ,-7 ,/ Glenn Smith C aIrman "0 SUMMARY SHEET STATED ON THIS BID FORM TION CALLED FOR ON THIS BID FORM MAY BE CAUSE J..~? $ /9,,,{;:f '6 / ,.1 Option: FOR DIESEL ENGINE IN-LIEU OF GAS: . $ J-I, /l-f3 / *Bid price shall be less taxes. MAKE (q 6' c.; Cl...':i_..J '~CJ (,,-,T 7 ~ <:-)'v k.........f; A ,<.), '(Y'j ) '\ /A 'L e,J 1../"",.. /z(, MODEL V J-S (5 c> C V~090(, 2w9 DELIVERY un1t BIDDER'S NAME /~-Y'/ /,,:y ,,\-r;:(J~ Ca..ACAoO-^l /1U-\ ;,0 /l-1....."t'cJ... SAles (J-- ..... BIDDER SIGN HERE ADDRESS 47,6" w A'V ' ,U '" -1"\, / , 1vt.,,,,I"'-' sT lit. ,u lj- ,~'- S Q~:; TELEPHONE NO. '-I.f.- I -:J. 7'" 0 STATE WARRANTY :5,jQi/tl2... 5~ 00 il f:<:tI'1./i"'" (2. (f,,,I<,,,3'<-(' 11/60 /J .a.-~\) 0-';i'1- \1 (,'" A- P?' "-t 1. ",.~ I';;z. I'L""", ,<;; 0 R- f~ DO', 'L".,C., o \~-^..- " ~-.' .....,':..~.,..":.; -:': ;,-. :. o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7, 1989 ITEM NO, Award Bid/Public Works i-ton truck BY:Frank stone 1'7 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Public Works AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee The City Council is requested to award the bid for the one ton dump truck for Public Works. Bids were opened on 1-20-89 at 10:00 A.M. for the 4x4 unit for the Fire Department and the 4x4 one ton dump truck for the Public Works Department. These units were advertised in our legal paper and also mailed to new truck dealers that are listed on the attached bidders list. No single dealer bid both trucks. I asked them why? Here are some of their reasons: I didn't receive a bid sheet. We don't build dump trucks. There is no money in it. We couldn't bid to your spec. The only way to save money on joint bids is to bid 5 to 10 units of the same description. Bids for the Public Works one ton 4x4 dump truck: SUPERIOR FORD LaHaas Body Diesel Fisher 9' Plow $21,008 510 1,987 $23,505 Crysteel Body Diesel Fisher 9' $21,266 510 Plow 1,784 $23,560 BOYER FORD Crysteel Body Diesel Fisher 9' plow $21,432 319 1,784 $23,535 MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o ART GOEBEL FORD LaHaas Body Diesel Fisher 9' Plow NORTH STARR INTERNATIONAL LAKE LAND FORD NO BID $21,096 319 1,750 $23,160 NO BID AS per specs, the Ford 4x4 one ton trucks all meet requirements. The specifications for the dump body and hoist, there is a difference. Under Dump Body - Floor = we are looking for the understructure to be totally interlaced by running crossmembers thru the long beams. Crysteel meets this spec, LaHaas uses a 6" structural steel channel for long beams with 3" structural steel channel welded crossmembers on 14" centers. May be very solid, but not to spec. $21,091. 00 319.00 1,750.00 $23,160.00 1,390.00 850.00 $25,400.00 60,000 drive train, 100.00 deduct after 12/12 dump box, 6 months on hydraulics. ART GOBEL FORD Truck and LaHaas Diesel Engine Fisher 9' Plow Body Excise Tax Radio Total package warranty 12/12 6 year, LaHaas 1 year BOYER FORD Truck and Crysteel Diesel Engine Fisher 9' Plow Body $21,432.00 319.00 1,784.00 $23,535.00 1,412.00 850.00 $25,797.00 Excise Tax Radio Total Package Warranty Truck 6 years-60,000 miles on power train, 1 year-12,000 miles on complete vehicle (100.00 deductible), Crysteel 2 year on dump box, 1 year on hydraulics (no deductible). I would prefer we buy the truck from Boyer Ford and get the Crysteel dump box because we already have two of them and for service they are located in Fridley, where LaHaas is located out on Highway 13 by the Mendota Bridge. Also the warranty is a lot better. Plus, the Crysteel box will fold down on both sides of the dump box. We did not spec that both sides fold down, but we will get it with their bid. There is a difference of $397.00. We would save this just in travel for warranty work. o TABULATION OF BIDS o PROJECT: /- //7<,...; ~--;;z./......././ BIDS OPEN: /:..;? a - g9 P & S 'BID Ret'dBOND .' CONTRACTOR ~~y- c::?/, Rl,t. p) ~ V~ IZtw J, . -5-/t1, ~ '73' i trO JS,0'D I~ '/k;;tL JL ~~ h{JJaJJ ~- '7k~ ~~ 4rY~ ~'~LL Ya/ Ol/;.L/S02. (l1) (' aJ/Y, /V 1 " !' ?g-/j'. ro · , J3/S3S dl; 09/ em (1;.u1 3/7, oU U~ / ?'S-cJ. V0 ... Engineer's Estimate o ....._-,..:-....,....;:;;.~....~....:.~'"''':'''.: .,__...~."~ ..___:--..~"'-.~__.._,._.....~.._ '. ". ~.-",..,.,....,'. '''' .. ,~.,___'":',.,-...,..-. --'".-,-' _.~..-_....,.....__._~:""..;"""""""_"'''_'''','''''''~.'~'-~''~'-''-:':":0-" -:-.~:..-_.._. '~.,.---....-_.'- ~~..,.---:-..~-..-'.. ".-...-,""-"~ _.~.._.'" .-.". o LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES 740 S. Concord st. Paul, MN 55075 ATTN: NEW TRUCK DEALER MACK DIESEL TRUCKS P.O. Box 64579 st. Paul, MN 55164-0579 ATTN: NEW TRUCK DEALER MAIN MOTORS 435 W. Main st Anoka, MN 55303 ATTN: STEVE CRACAUER 421-2700 PETERBIT TRUCK SALES 558 E. Villaume Box 268 S. st. Paul, MN 55075 ATTN: NEW TRUCK DEALER BLAINE DODGE 9999 Central Ave Blaine, MN 55434 ATTN: MIKE HANNON 780-9999 VIKING CHEVROLET 7501 NE Hwy 65 Fridley, MN 55432 ATTN: JACK WOJAC 786-6100 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1100 Main Street Hopkins, MN 55343 ATTN: BRAD BLAHA 938-2751 MINER FORD 1100 Silver Lake Road New Brighton, MN 55112 ATTN: GEORGE CORNELL 633-9010 o NORTH STAR International Trucks 3000 NE Broadway Minneapolis, MN 55413 ATTN: NEW TRUCK DEALER SUPERIOR FORD 9700 56th Ave N Minneapolis, MN 55422 ATTN: BILL STEWART 559-9111 MALKERSON MOTORS 1206 E. 1st Ave Shakopee, MN 55379 ATTN: RANDY 445-5200 ELK RIVER FORD 17219 Hwy, 10 Elk River, MN 55330 ATTN: WADE TURNER 441-2300 CRYSTEEL 1130 73rd Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 ATTN: NEW TRUCK DEALER BROOKDALE FORD 2500 Co. Rd. 10 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 ATTN: DENNY 561-5500 MERIT CHEVROLET 2695 Brookview Drive St. Paul, MN 55119 ATTN: JIM 739-4400 BARNETT OLDSMOBILE 6415 NW Hwy 10 Anoka, MN 55303 ATTN: BEN EZAKI 421-4950 ITEN CHEVROLET 6701 Brooklyn Blvd Brooklyn Cnt., MN 55429 ATTN: AL HUNTER 561-9220 BOYER FORD TRUCK 2811 NE Broadway Minneapolis, MN 55413 ATTN: NEW TRUCK DEALER ART GOEBEL 3401 Coon Rapids Blvd Coon Rapids, MN 55433 ATTN: ED NEHRING 427-1120 THOMAS PONTIAC 3815 Coon Rapids Blvd Coon Rapids, MN 55433 ATTN: MITCH 427-8222 LAHASSE 3575 state Hwy 13 st. Paul, MN 55122 ATTN:DON ANDERSON BROOKDALE AMC/JEEP 7417 Brooklyn Blvd Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 ATTN: DON KNUTSON 566-7220 ROSEDALE CHEVROLET 2845'Hwy 35W Roseville, MN 55113 ATTN: PETE 636-0340 AMC/JEEP STEPHENS BUICK JEEP 2370 Hwy 100 Minneapolis, MN 55416 ATTN: NEW TRUCK DEALER 929-0081 . , . -. , := \ ( t .. _.. :c;, ' , ,- ~ \- FORD 300/500 MASTERS ED NEHRING 7th YtaT Mtmbtr 'Al .~ ,:Al ~ Office: 427-1120 CALLED FOR ON THIS BID FORK KAY BE Home: 786-3533 o ART GOEBEL FORD 3401 Coon Rapids Blvd, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 BID FORK. $ :J.10 9/, 00 . ~OTAL PRICE OF TRUCK AND BODY: )ptions: . FOR DIESEL ENGINE IN-LIEU OF GAS: 9' FISHER OR EQUAL SNOWPLOW INSTALLED COKPLETE WITH SNOWFOIL AND BELT DRIVEN HYDRAULICS: *Bid price shall be less taxes. $ .:JJ~ (JO J 7 S" () /('JO $ KAKE J:' d i? D KODEL F 3.s- 0> DELIVERY ~~in?:tld~17~r~~~)>for complete unit) STATE WARRANTY :;.~ .1 ~tJJ ' .cOc:J.AJ /<~PlbS L!j)"VD , e t1d,l\l R /7- PI j) S h/ /1//1/ 5""S- ~f] 'j..-- , A K'r (;dt:l?ffL rd~P- . tfJ-:J..... ~f).7-//"2d I~/ I:l.. ~v;Y ~~/~<1() DR I i/f/J/A/' t! /,10(/0' D~p(./cT /9rn:'/( IY/::2- BIDDER SIGN HERE BIDDER'S NAKE ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. o >- .-.' ".',,,-~,,'."-.' _..'~--"- .._- ..- B 31195 TRUCK MAKE liaBass DATE F.O.B. TERMS 1-16-89 COMM, NO. YEAR MODEL W.B. TRANSMISSION TIRE SIZE - REAR OTHER TRUCK INFO, CA-CT EXPECTED DATE OF CHASSIS ARRIVAL 2-3 Weeks PRODUCT CODE VOUCHER NO. MAT'L REQUISITION DELIVERY REQUIRED FIRM ADDRESS City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. ')')':\04 CITY Andover, MN ATTENTION: Quantity - V ACCEPTED: CUSTOMER BY ULTIMATE USER 755-5100 DESCRIPTION OF ORDER, LaHass Small Contractor Packa~e All Continuous Welds - 10 Gauge Steel Throughout Dimensions: 9' long x 91" wide Headboard: To top of cab, wire mesh with 10 gauge steel construction, and 1/4 cab shield Sides: To be 15" high, 10 gauge steel construction, curb side to drop 1800 with 4 heavy duty grease fittings. Boxed upper rail with 450 slanted rub rail. Floor: To be 8 gauge steel Understructure: To be 6" structural steel channel long beams with 3" structural. steel channel crossmembers on 14" centers Tailgate: To be 21" high, 10 gauge steel construction, 3/8" double acting spreader chains or lay down chains, 2 sets of chain slots (4 total), behind cab trip lever and lever action top pin release, with 1" down hooks Lights: To meet D.O.T. specifications, biased clearance lights front and rear Mud Flaps: To be rear of rear tires Hoist: To be Rugby Model SF-165 double acting, low mount, 9 ton capacity, safety prop for servicing, and dash contro Phone Customer When Ready Con't You can't afford to pay less without sacrificing quality and performance in your equipment! , Price TOTAL PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE LA HASS MFG, & SALES ING. By:~.JaJJL ASK FOR PHONE NO. (4) COPIES: WHITE - CUSTOMER COPY BLUE - SHOP COPY PINK - OFFICE COPY YELLOW - SALESMAN COPY B 31196 LaH... Mfg.. Sal..,.n.. 0 3575 Stata Highway 13 0 St. Paul, Minna.... 55122 0 16121452-1201 0 MN Wal$ (800) 392-0347 0 ORDER i.aBass !XKaUOT A TION CUST, P,O. NO, TERMS F.O.B. COMM. NO. TRUCK MAKE YEAR 1-16-89 W.B. CA.CT TRANSMISSION TIRE SIZE - REAR OTHER TRUCK INFO. DELIVERY REQUIRED PRODUCT CODE VOUCHER NO. MAT'L REQUISITION FIRM ADDRESS CITY ATTENTION: City of Andover ULTIMATE USER Quantity DESCRIPTION OF ORDER Price Con't Hydraulic Power: Belt driven hydraulics with electric clutch pump Hitch Type: Frame mounted, 2-5/16" pint1e/ball combination This unit to be mounted and painted 1 choice of color. Paint # (customer's choice) Options Included In Price: 1. Rear apron with recessed lights 2. Electric backup alarm 3. Strobe light with self-leveling bracket Net Price: + Applicable Taxes 5995.00 Options Not Included In Price: 1. 9' Fisher Snow Plow, installed complete, with snowfoi1 and hydraulics Add: $1750.00 , Phone Customer When Ready You can't afford to pay less without sacrificing quality and performance in your equipment! TOTAL ASK FOR PHONE NO. 0- ACCEPTED: PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE LA HASS MFG, & SALES ING. CUSTOMER BY~~ BY (4) COPIES: WHITE _ CUSTOMER COPY BLUE - SHOP COPY PINK - OFFICE COPY YELLOW - SALESMAN COPY THE FAMOUS CONTRACTOR'S eDDY We can furnish a special power tailgate to lift heavy cargo from the ground to the floor of box. With the power tailgate you can still dump thru ... same as a regular gate. ( " We use a high quality hoist to give your body a high dump angle for easy discharge of cargo. CONTRACTOR'S BODY SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE TON CHASSIS 88" O,D, 5" structural channel. 4" structural channel. 10 gauge smooth steel. 10 gauge smooth steel. To top of cab / window cut out / 10 ga. Legal to federal specifications, 15" high / quick drop type on curb side as standard. 15" high / 10 ga. / quick drop type, 1 coat primer / 2 finish coat any color. BODY WIDTH: LONG BEAMS: CROSS MEMBERS: FLOOR MATERIAL: SIDE MATERIAL: HEADBOARD HEIGHT: LIGHTS: SIDES: GATE: PAINT: o THREE SIZES: g' for short W.S, (60" CA). 11' or 12' for long W,S, (84" CA), LA HASS MANUFACTURING & SALES, INC, 3575 Highway 13, St. Paul, Minnesota 55122 (612) 452-1201 , Mn Wats 1-800-392-0347 Side can be made to drop for easy hand or forklift loading, either side or both. Hinges have grease fittings, Rugged 10 gauge headboard, tailgate, and sides. ,'< ,. ~' Bover Ford Trucks o~ 2811 N.E. Broadway, Minneapolis, MN 55413 6121378-1851 .J/ino..'" - '. January 15, 1989 City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 Attention: city Council 1989 Model F350 Ford Dump, Gas Engine, 137" WB, CA 60, 4x4 Chassis Cab Options: 11000# GVW Conventional Cab Cloth 3-Person Bench Seat 19 Gal Fuel Tank + 18.2 Auxiliary 460 CID EFI V8'Engine Oil Filter - Full Flow Throw-away Type Air Cleaner - Dry Type Sized to Engine 100 Amp Alternator 72 Amp Hr., 650 CCA Maintenance-Free Battery Transmission 3-Speed Automatic 5000# Monobeam Front Axle 8250# Rear Axle - 4.10 Ratio Super Engine Cooling w/Auxiliary Transmission Cooler Power Brakes, Disc Front, Drum Rear Tires (6) LT235/85RX16E BSW All-Season Spare Rim Gauges, Amp, Oil, Temp and Fuel Wheels Argent 16X16.0 8 Hole Power Steering AM/FM/Stereo Radio Dual Electric Horns Desert Tan Paint Bright Finish Recreational Mirrors Dual Sun Visors, Dome Light, Seat Belts (3) Turn Signals, Back-Up Lights, Cigar Lighter High Output Heater, Tinted Glass, Courtesy Light Crysteel 3-Yd Tipper as per specs Fleet Price Delivered Net Cash on Delivery $21,432.00 o .' . BID SUMMARY SHEET o BID MUST BE STATED ON THIS BID FORM. ,'AlLURE TO SUPPLY COMPLETE INFORMATION CALLED FOR ON THIS BID FORM MAY BE :AUSE FOR REJECTION. " r , ~OTAL PRICE OF TRUCK AND BODY: $ 21,432.00 )ptions: ~OR DIESEL ENGINE IN-LIEU OF GAS: $ 319.00 9' FISHER OR EQUAL SNOWPLOW INSTALLED COMPLETE NITH SNOWFOIL AND BELT DRIVEN HYDRAULICS: $ 1,7A~ 00 NQ ~yas. R)~3 already on tr *Bid price shall be less taxes. MAKE Ford MODEL F350 (F38) BIDDER SIGN DELIVERY BIDDER'S NAME Boyer Ford Trucks, Inc. ADDRESS 2811 N.E. Broadway St. Minneapolis, Mn. ,,41~ TELEPHONE NO. (hl?) '<7Q Hi.)1 STATE WARRANTY 6yr.-60,000 miles on power train ($100.00'Deductable) lyr-12,000 miles on complete vehicle (no Deductable) FORD 300/500 MASTERS BRUCE A, REO BOYER TRUCKS. INC, 2811 N. E,~ay SI, Minneapolis, MN 55413 18th tar Member .rmm (612) 378-1851 .. -~_..- < . CITY OF ANDOVER SPECIFICATIONS FOR 1988 OR 1989 1 TON 10,000 LB. G.V.W. SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCK o This dump truck shall be a combination of the latest production model as currently advertised meeting the terms of this Specification, new and complete in all details; . Furnish all standard equipment advertised, whether or not specifically called for here, except where optional over standard or conflicting equipment is specified. It shall include an installed 2-3 cubic yard dump box with electric hoist. MXNXMUM REQUXREMENTS CAB: Shall be three person size conventional type cab of the latest design, ventilated, and with all windows of safety glass. Tinted. Furnish with standard three person bench seat. . yes . . yes yes yes yes yeR G.V.W.: Not less than 1f,000 pounds. 1 Ton Rating 60" C.A. 137" W.B. 4 W.heel Drive WHEEL BASE: OIL FILTER: Heavy duty all cloth upholstery. 19 ~allon minimum with auxiliary tank. Shall be a 450 cubic inch displacement minimum v-type gasoline equipped with automatic choke, muffler, and tailpipe. Full-flow, throwaway type. Dry type air cleaner sized to engine supplied. FUEL TANK: ENGXNE: ~9g cia yes AIR CLEANER: yes GENERATOR & REGULATOR SYSTEM: V-belt driven alternator not less than 90 amperes with a fully transistorized regulator. yes- 100 amp FOT BRAKE~: 68 Amp. hr., 475 CCA, maintenance free, with heavy duty wiring. Three-speed automatic with extra cooling. 4.10 approximate ratio. Front axle minimum 50PO lbs. monobeam. Rear auxiliary springs. Heavy duty with super engine cooling. Manufacturer's standard disk sized for the unit's GVW rating, power assist. yes- 72 amp 650cca BATTERY: TRANSMXSSION: yes AXLES: RADIATOR: ~7e~ yes yes "_..~--"~-- '. ." EAR 'BRAKES: AR~ BRAKES: IRES: HEELS: AUGES: IMS: TEERING GEAR: WHEEL: o . 1. Dash mounted gauges: fuel, engine temperature, ammeter, oil pressure, (engine temperature and oil pressure shall be direct reading gauges), and headlight beam indicator, engine warning lights for low oil pressure * EXCEPTION - gauges only and high water temperature. 2. Fresh air hot water heater and defroster, largest available. Power assist solid enclosed housing. Furnish mechanical parking brake system. Six (6) LT235/85RX16E BSW all season tires. Spare rim and tire. Needle gauges indicating oil pressure, temperature, and amps. Tire manufacturer's recommended standard not less than 16 x 6.0 inches. power steering hydraulic actuated installed complete. Heavy duty type. Manufacturer's standard push button AM-FM radio. Furnish with dual.electric horns. Cab and box be painted Desert Tan. (special paint) NOTE: If pC\int is d,esert tan metallic. lie. not cl.ese;:;r .ran The folloW1ng equ1pment, a~ong W1Eh a ~om~~~~e line of regular equipment, whether or not standard, shall be furnished and installed: 3. Heavy duty, dual automatic wipers and dual frost resistant windshield washers. 4. Three (3) safety belts, floor or frame anchored, per SAE standards ASB! approved all-metal buckle quick detachable type with retractors. 5. Manufacturer's standard turn signals and reflectors are required to meet SAE Class A standards. Furnish with a simultaneous flashing warning switch, and backup lights. 6. Dual sun visors, 7" x 19" approximately. 7. Two (2) door mounted arm rests. ---,~....-......." yeR yes yes yes ves ypc::! yes yes yes you may deduct$52.00 yes yes yes yes yes yes .~ o o '. Interior and rear view mirrors and recreational mirrors on outside. Front bumper only. lo..Complete lighting in accordance with National Safety Standards Act and the Minnesota Motor Vehicle and Traffic Laws latest edition. 11. xnterior dome light. _....-.__.~~.-.-.~ .- ---_._.,.~- '-.' --.-.-. "-'<"~-" .. '"I .. -i, ~ ,~.... O' :ZE: ;\PACITY: IDES: LOOR: . :EADBOARD: ,'AI LGATE: fLAPS: MISC. : HOIST: TAIL LIGHTS: TRAILER HITCH: PAINT: STROBE LIGHT: o SPECIFICATIONS FOR DUMP BODY & HOIST crysteel or equal 2-3 yard Tipper Body or equal 9' long x 78" wide inside. 2-3 yards. Sides shall be 12" high with all 12 gauge ex-ten 50 steel. Curb side shall fold down 180 degrees with single lever control and have four hinges per side. Sides shall have side board provisions. 10 gauge ex-ten 50 floor, hi-tensile steel. crossmembers to support floor every 14".. Crossmembers shall be welded to outside rubrail. Understructure shall be totally interlaced by running crossmembers thru the long beams. '. All 12 gauge ex-ten 50 steel minimum with 1/4 cab shield and steel mesh window. 18" high, 12 gauge ex-ten 50 steel, 5-1/6" chain, front trip lever, 1" H.D. hardware with removable top hinge pin. Full length rear holster apron across rear of body with recessed clearance lights. pins shall be 1-1/4". Rear' and front of wheels. Electric back-up alarm. NTEA Class 20 low mount double arm type. 9-ton rating. Double acting with safety prop. Hoist shall be power up and down. Extra set of 2 face turn lights with pipe guard mounted on top of bulkhead in each corner. pintle plate with reinforcement ahead or rear spring shackles. combination 2-5/16" pintle ball hitch chain loops at side. To match cab. Yellow strobe light mounted on self leveling bracket installed on cab shield. Brush guard around light for protection. Toggle switch in cab. ~--_. Crvsteel 9' Both sides fold down Standard Standard Standard- Yes Yes RC420 Combo Hoist Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - .c , .... . ... HYDRAULIC SYSTBK: PUMP: o VALVE: CONTROL: FILTER: RESERVOIR: Shall be equippe~with 12 volt electric magnetic clutch. Shall be capable of 15 g.p.m. and rated to 3000 p.s.i. Shall be driven with 2 belts, mounting bracket shall be adjustable to enable the belt tension to be adjusted. Gresen V20-DF3-4-3-4 'Valve shall be equipped with float for plow and with combined flow section for sander. Shall be mounted behind cab and between frame rails. Morse cable type. Dual access for plow. Single lever control for sander & hoist. . Gresen, tank type mounted. 12 gallon minimum capacit~. T~k shall be baffled. Shall have 3-5 lb. brunning valve, magnetic drain plug, and fluid site gauge. Tank shall be filled with no less than 12 gallons A.T.F. Yes . . Yes Yes Yes Yes THIS EQUIPMENT INSTALLED COMPLETE WITH LIGHTS, FLAPS AND PAINT WILL COST -$6253.00 ------ -------- . I o ~ ~ '~.' ... ..- . . . . .' BID SUMMARY SHEET o BID KUST BE STATED ON THIS BID FORM. 'AX LURE TO SUPPLY COKPLETE INFORMATION CALLED FOR ON THIS BID FORM MAY BE :AUSE FOR REJECTION. "'. ~OTAL PRICE OF TRUCK AND BODY: $ )ptions: ~OR DIESEL ENGINE IN-LIEU OF GAS: 9' FISHER OR EQUAL SNOWPLOW INSTALLED COMPLETE WITH SNOWFOIL AND BELT DRIVEN HYDRAULICS: *Bid price shall be less taxes. $ $ 1784.00 No Hyds. Hyds already on trucK MAKE KODEL DELIVERY 45-60 days ARO (final delivery date for complete unit) BIDDER SIGN HERE BIDDER'S NAl'lE Crystee1 Truck Equipment ADDRESS 1130 - 73rd Avenue NE Fridlev. MN 55432 TELEPHONE NO. (612)571-1902 STATE WARRANTY 1 ye~r on Body and Hvdraulics - 2 vears on Hoist Thank You, t.l~ CRY STEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT o ". " ;;.:.~,~>. _. . ".' -, ::' _::.;-,:',-':':-~;.-i,j~.:'~;;<' ";,>,',:\,:,,'/:\_\"~:,(f.-:'_.". .'"- ,.".." ,,' ,('-,',- ',- --,--.--.. ,.~ -.- - - -, , C/lYSTBBl TRUCK EQUIPMENT "1130 - 73RDAVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY (612)571-1902. ' .. o o f'_ ~ f -' , The most versatile small dump body you can buy. Crysteel's rugged Two.Yard Tipper - built for versatility to meet the needs of America's contractors, landscapers and public works departments. Made for one.ton trucks with 10,000 GVWR, the Two.Yard Tipper doubles as a dump truck and contractor body, Big on quality construction features, the Two.Yard Tipper has a box braced four-way tailgate with a front mounted trip lever for easy spreading. The rigid one.piece front bulkhead with" quarter cab protector and window is standard. Choose from three stable hoists for the capacity)<<' ,.::yolJ need. Full length, low m9lJntl19il;t and subframe . " . speedsinstallationwi~h9u dirCOfO'"urltiri< Lifetime greaseless composite Teflon@ bearings at critical pivot points eliminate problems and reduce maintenance. Precision hydraulic cylinders are double acting for positive control. You select either or 12 electric pump. ~';-":'. ' .;:"'5~<~;! - Long life features . Rugged tubular interlocking under. structure doubles the floor support for more strength with less weight. . 12.gauge high strength alloy steel, minimum yield 50,000 psi. . One.piece, rigid front bulkhead, quarter cab protector and window. . HeaVY duty, box braced tailgate with 5/8 n hinge plate and latch. . Full width rear apron with rubber mounted clearance lights. . Front & rear full depth corner pillars. . 45 degree sloped,dirt shedding rubrails and braces. . Grease zerk lubricated tailgate hinge pins and trip lever linkage. . Low body mounting height. . Sideboard pocket extensions. . Crysteel LB400 or RC410 hoists with easy mounting subframe. . Factory installed body prop. Versatile options . Fold down curb side or both sides, using Crysteel's unique recessed hinge for easy loading I unloading. . Half cab protector extension kit. . Heavy Duty Package includes: - 10 gauge high strength steel floor, - 1" heavy duty hinge plate and latch. - Clearance lights recessed. - Metal conduit wiring protection. - Crysteel RC420 subframe hoist. . 3 to 4 Cubic Yard Package for 1 '12 Ton Truck (Minimum 14,000 GVWR)- - Heavy Duty Package listed above. - Sides and tailgate 6" higher. - Floor 4" wider. - Boxed top rail. - Deletes window on front bulkhead. . PTO or electric pump packages. WARRANTY Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc. warrants its products for a period of one year from date of purchase. The warranty provides that our products must perform satisfactorily or we will repair. replace, or refund the purchase price at the option of the purchaser. Hydraulic pumps, valves. 5 and other purchased parts are covered by the anties of their respective manufacturers. ny parts returned to Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc. shall be shipped prepaid, and will be returned F.O.B. Lake Crystal. Minnesota. We will not assume responsi~ bility for shipping, labor, or travel expenses. The warranty is void if the product has been ob. viously abused, or subjected to other than normal usage. We reserve the right to make improvements without notice or obligation regarding models pre- viously sold. Two-Yard Tipper Body Specifications BODY LENGTH 8 FEET 9 FEET 10 FEET Front bulkhead 35 inches 35 inches 35 inches Side height 14 inches 12 inches 10 inches Tailgate height 20 inches 18 inches 16 inches Inside width 78 inches 78 inches 78 inches Body capacity 2-3 cubic yards 2-3 cubic yards 2-3 cubic yards Standard body weight 12401bs. 12671bs. 12701bs. Hoist Capacity inTons Hoist Specifications ~. '''y' - ,.~.::.,. LB400 RC410 RC420 9 FEET 10 FEET 5.8 5.1 6.8 6.0 9.0 7.9 NTEA PERFORMANCE CLASS: 10 10 20 Cylinder bore & stroke 4x15'1s" 4x15'1s" 4x18" Chrome cylinder shaft 1 '12" 1'12" , 1 %" Max. operating pressure 3500 psi 3500 psi 3500 psi Mounting height 8'12" 8'12" 10" Hoist weight 4251bs. 5101bs. 5751bs. CAUTION: The combined weight of truck body, hoist and load must not exceed the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of the truck. Assumes water level load and includes body weight . Not available with Heavy Duty Body .. Not available with Standard Body Specially designed - with quality in mind. SOLD 81': CRYSTEEL'" MFG. INC.' CRYSTEEl DISTRIBUTING IHe. Hwy. 60 East Lake Crystal, MN 56055 Phone 507,726-6041 Mtl Toll Flee 1-800-122~ Highway 60 East, P.O. Box 178 Lake Crystal, Minnesota 56055 Call 507-726.2728 or 1-800-533,0494 --~ - ---- c o o -I:I:O-l""'c...(f)~"'" :::rill c -'::::"-'-0::::" 0"" en 3 III 3 III 3!e. -r+ 0 ::3 31ll,< OJ"",-o<oOJ m::J """'::::..(l)<.....""'" en 0.. OJ 0 0 (j)<D0<D s::c...~:E Ci).... (ii":E 3 oOo:Jlll~en <D Ci)5:::r -<:J .... ....en III 0 :E :J Ci)(f)OJ:EZ(f)a}a}(f) <D~Olllce'~oo~ :J<o..::::::r<:::r:::r< ~ 0''< III - o' :J :J o' III <D (f):J (f) <D -. -. <D _ :::r-:::r 00 (f) (f) 0 '< 0 (f) ~ ~ s:: <D ~ '0 s::'O ~ "TI "TI1ll <<DS::1lls::<D00:J o.en III :J.1ll en (il (il ~ <D S:::J ~:J 3 3 <D "",1ll1ll<D1ll Illlll.... ::::..:J1C 10 1ll1ll<D....<D :J:J ::J co.., ..... 1ll<D 10.... <D .... o "1J o' ~ c:: "0 Qo o ~ ~. ~ en (1) .... 0<: o' (1) ):. n1 -. tii 0- CD '- 0--1,," OJ c:::r<Do 0..<D<D,< 10 '< '0. <D CD .-+:;...... :: .S;.... fO-i 0-'-'2 ,.....:::J-::J r+CT~o ....<Dc"" !!!.o :J.en :J1ll<D(f) -oc ......(1) :Jeno..., 1C<D....<: :::r -. iii'o <D 0 _ <D ~-Ill-l <D ~(j)CD .... -'en 0 -Y)""'r+:::r ......01ll:J I\) :E 0.. o' - :J<:-' 8'0 ~ ~ o ~.o en '0 0.. CD III CDCD3.... .... -'CD CD ,<:J:JO CD:E-O III 0 -':J :"",...,::J:::!: ""3:J 3CDC III 0 III :J:J"= enlll'< :::r:J.... -. .... '0 o III . Ill-' OJ-:J o .... :J ,<CD<o CD '0 .. !!!. en ;"l en CD < -. (') CD s: 0,) .~ 0,) CQ CD 3 CD ~ r+ -I ... 0,) -. ~ -. ~ CQ Om :J III CD 0 0:J" ....- _CD :E 0 05 ~ Q. CD III III :l en _. . en en Co CD 0.. :l III III .... CD III en o - CD '0 !!!. -.... 0- C - en '0 <D o Pi N <D 0.. :J -I(f)(f)......w 2(j)1ll0~ Q.1ll5.OJ(f) ~3 O<D < OJ 0.. =2 < a ji) '< -. ~iD!iC/l~ :::r~):.~C/l C/l-.....,o- -:JCD III III <0 III C/l= = _(J) ::0 III o = o en 3 "TI-oo-l-l o !!!. iii' iU oCD :J :J '0 -. r+ r+ nl:!. 3" m OJ c; :l -. :l 0 :J"<O 2 0..2.):.0- ):.:J"....::::):. = CD o.en <0 III <D :!!. :J en en 3 ~ <D :J :J 0 - <D o - - o' CD ..... ..... OJm o x 0..'0 ,<CD 3 ~. CD<D :J :J .......0 -0 CD III 0.. -. c... ;:l.o CD c .... .... fJJ :J <D '< 3 CD :J I\) en c..."TI o III C 0 .... .... :J 0 ~-< 3-1 CD iU :J :J -I CD CD 0.. o :J" :J Q. III :J en "TI Ql n ~ o c ... III r- o n Ql .... o ~ mO ::1 0 Q,:I CI)~ mCD ,,::1 CD ;Q,tI:J <D~o mm Q, ~~~ 3 .... ::n III ::1 CD OC CQ '0 -:rwm m .... (').:" .... :::~ ~!. .... ::1 .... . m. SQI :l_ ..~ :I: "TI '2. . <D - :J !:. ji) .. "TI 0..-.... .... CD . III _...., (') o. _ "a 0 ~ ::0 c -< :J03 ):. . ~ ~. S. ......:E:l :::r ~CDen 0 :: = . ~. :::r..... <D <D...., 0.. _C/lCD _ - "0' r+ III _. 0 0 3 0 -. C/l ~~;t->~ '< ....... -. o ~. 0 c.. Z =. . <D... CD fJJ .. "":Eo :J ^' :l 0- .' :E'< . ...... a ::0- CD ~ '<" o o r 1 lit -I ... c n ~' tn.. o CD ... <..... ,.-.... n. CD o CD :J .... CD ... ;:; (I) f/l .. "TI""'~ 0::::" .. ....00 -<:JO o 0.. III C III 3' ....'< (') st ., oa~ :l c III <:<0' ~:::r ? -. "TI <D .... :J -. 00.. <D III '< -m:I: ;:l.IllCD <D en III .... '< .... ~)>..... III 00 -0- CD<D-I wen.... O1en~ :Ec;"" poC/la -,...g :J -0 :l 0..1ll- ~c-< -- ::!.Q) III :J -0.. !!!s:: < -. 0..:J . :l CD III '0 o en :J" OJ-I:I: 0):. -'- 0 ..... 0.. !i1ll:J !e.=o... oen. ,'(jj-' :, ='0):.- =. '<::J<.... 0 . .<0 CD oOJ:J. -0 .... < III III ::!..m:J"<:J - :J.o CD CD o..m -.C III - .0 o -. 0.. 0.. C/l C c'O CDIll-, .... 3:J:,;"' :E '0 enCDO):.en3 III :Jiii':::;'- CD ..... .... .... ):. :E :l CD III 0.... -..... lll:JcO(il:i' Dio..Ciia Q. -. - -. C "TICD C -.:::J Q.r+ Ill'CD-<Do.. 2::J"- ~ o..~ CD~~en<.. . ~ 0- <...... en_01CDo <DO-l-O oooog--I .....=s.....o 3OJOen:l -g :i' a5 -=;; :I: _" 0,< <D en;."" 0.. ....C/l<D!iiU O'OIll<DC iUo..CD= (D'< :J:-o oOJoPO-o Q 0 iii'lll (D o..2.=cg: en:J":J3- CD- en-'"TI C/l -':J .... =2 o..clll _.Ill CD 3 3 o :J - CDo..01::-CD :"::'::'.''':':-':-.>:'.:.:-:F.' i.:':";:::_-:: ,,::' >m /.......><..0 m. OJ-n-o".a C/l. m.:J"Ill.m C 1ll....:lo>1ll3- ..0-' o Co <D.... -Ill ~ '<c"C :J".:J;:l.c.fl.:~ =_CD-o'3 -I <D m 3 m'2. C/l.o'<+3 <D::O:J III III = 'O.:J :E<D. CD g.mo..g.o~ ~O'CD_;:l. ~ :!. .... ~ c... -:la iii' 4' = - .... o (f)cO' III "TI C ;::r -'<0.0 Ro iii' ~:J ~ c 3 <D ;:l..~ 0.. :J. '0 3 en iD 30.. 0 _. 0-1 en <D <D PO.:":i' m S. ~ :T 0 01;l ;:l.m::o.sn iDC/l<D 0 :E o' ::0.0 0 0 ~ 8 '(5" - :J:JIllEOCDO o-cn :J:):.O'O ~-:J-g ...... 1ll="3<DOO' ce' :J<O <D -;:;:-1 :J" 0.. :J :J::::j),. <D ,... -13 ....0 -!i ::;; OCD 0= O:J _enom -- en.o en "'" :J C ::::.. -1-' III 0 '0 o 03 :J" _ <D -. en :J 15 - - o f,h f,hf,hf,hf,hf,hf,h ......f,hY)......WWI\)............ !J1 JXl !J1 !J1 .9 .9 !J1 01 .01 00010000bO 000000000 000000000 b b b b cli::><:, b b 000000000 :E <D 0.. o :J ..:; o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7, 1989 ~~~%OVEth~. FOR , , \ AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Commissi n ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administration ITEM NO. Approve Animal Control Contract BY: Vicki Volk The City Council is requested to approve the Animal Con Contract for 1989. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7, 1989 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. Administration ITEM Approve Assessor's NO. Contract BY: Vicki Volk FOR The City Council is requested to approve the contract with the Anoka County Assessor for the assessment years 1991 through 1996. Attached is a copy of the contract and a letter from Mr. Leone explaining the new increased rates. V:Encl. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY (\ COUNTY OF ANOKA Office of the County Assessor COURT HOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 Enclosed is the new contract for the assessment years 1991 thru 1996. Please note the change in the payment date from July 15 to January 15. As you will recall in the 1985 assessment I granted a rate re- duction which carries thru the 1990 assessment. Under the new contract I am no longer able to grant this reduction. Because the cost to do the assessment is not being recovered. Therefore I am using the 1985 contract rates before the reduction and ad- justing them by the cost of living and merit increase to reflect the 1991 assessment rate as follows: 1985 Assessment Rate Before Reduction Adjusted to the 1991 Assessment Residential Comm/Ind Vacant $ 5.43 11.57 1. 44 $ 8.51 18.16 2.25 As in the past, our office has strived to give you the best assessment possible at the lowest cost available. If you wish to continue to contract with our office to do your assessment work please sign all copies and return to the Anoka County Assessor's office. I will then return a fully executed contract. to you. If you have any questions concerning this contract, please feel free to contact me. Yours very truly, ~4~;:':"'~_<?_~ , l.9""" Gay I" eone Anoka County Assessor GL:cls 0\ , \ \ \, Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer o .0 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOCAL UNIT AND COUNTY FOR ASSESSMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into by and between the City of Andover , hereinafter referred to as MUNICIPALITY, and the County of Anoka, a political subdivision under the laws of the State of Minnesota, 325 East Main Street, Anoka~ Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, this 23 day of January, 1989. WHEREAS, the Municipality wishes to enter into an agreement with the County to provide for the assessment of the property in said Municipality by the County Assessor, and; WHEREAS, it is the wish of said County to cooperate with said Municipality to provide for a fair and equitable assessment of said property; and WHEREAS, said work shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. ~ 471.59. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED, IT IS AGREED AS FOllOWS: 1. That said municipality constitutes a separate assessment district which lies in this County and that all property in the geographical boundaries of this district shall be assessed by the County Assessor of the County beginning with the assessment of the year 1991 providing this agreement is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. 2. It is further agreed that the office of the local assessor of the Municipality having been abolished, pursuant to prior agreement and the approval of the Commissioner of Revenue, shall cease to exist for the duration of this agreement, which shall be until January 15, 1996. 3. In consideration for said assessment services, the Municipality hereby agrees to pay the County an annual payment to be paid to the County Treasurer on or before January 15 as follows: 1991 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1991 1992 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1992 1993 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1993 1994 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1994 1995 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1995 1996 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1996 The assessment payment shall be based on the number of parcels in the preceding assessment and on the following computations: 1991 Assessment, payable in 1991 - $8.51 for each improved parcel of residential, seasonal recreational residential and agricultural type of property, plus $18.16 for each improved parcel of commercial, industrial and public utility type of property, plus $2.25 for each vacant parcel of property. . B. The same procedure shall be used as described in Section 3, Subd. A for computation of the assessment payments due in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 and A. o o - 2 - 1996 except the rate shall be adjusted according to the Anoka County cost of living and merit adjustments from January 1 to December 31 in the year the assessment is performed. 4. Notwithstanding paragraph 2 above, Municipality or Anoka County shall have the right to terminate this agreement on or before December 31 of the year prior to the year in which termination shall be effective. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below: COUNTY OF ANOKA MUNICIPALITY By: By: Dan Erhart, Chairman Anoka County Board of Commissioners (Title): Dated: Dated: ATIEST: By: (Title): By: John "Jay" Mclinden eounty Administrator Dated: Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Assistant Anoka County Attorney The above agreement is hereby approved by the Commissioner of Revenue this day of I 1 989. Commissioner of Revenue (DV\Contract\Assmagrm) o o JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOCAL UNIT AND COUNTY FOR ASSESSMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into by and between the Ci ry _ of Andover , hereinafter referred to as MUNICIPALITY, and the County of Anoka, a political subdivision under the laws of the State of Minnesota, 325 East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, this 23 day of January, 1989. WHEREAS, the Municipality wishes to enter into an agreement with the County to provide for the assessment of the property in said Municipality by the County Assessor, and; WHEREAS, it is the wish of said County to cooperate with said Municipality to provide for a fair and equitable assessment of said property; and WHEREAS, said work shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. ~ 471.59. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED, IT IS AGREED AS FOllOWS: 1 . That said municipality constitutes a separate assessment district which lies in this County and that all property in the geographical boundaries of this district shall be assessed by the County Assessor of the County beginning with the assessment of the year 1991 providing this agreement is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. 2. It is further agreed that the office of the local assessor of the Municipality having been abolished, pursuant to prior agreement and the approval of the Commissioner of Revenue, shall cease to exist for the duration of this agreement, which shall be until January 15, 1996. 3. In consideration for said assessment services, the Municipality hereby agrees to pay the County an annual payment to be paid to the County Treasurer on or before January 15 as follows: 1991 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1991 1992 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1992 1993 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1993 1994 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1994 1995 Assessment services payable on or before January .15, 1995 1996 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1996 The assessment payment shall be based on the number of parcels in the preceding assessment and on the following computations: A. 1991 . Assessment, payable in 1991. - $8.51 for each improved parcel of residential, seasonal recreational residential and agricultural type of property, plus $18.16 for each improved parcel of commercial, industrial and public utility type of property, plus $2.25 for each vacant parcel of property. B. The same procedure shall be used as described in Section 3, Subd. A for computation of the assessment payments due in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 and . o o - 2 - 1996 except the rate shall be adjusted according to the Anoka County cost of living and merit adjustments from January 1 to December 31 in the year the assessment is performed. 4. Notwithstanding paragraph 2 above, Municipality or Anoka County shall have the right to terminate this agreement on or before December 31 of the year prior to the year in which termination shall be effective. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below: COUNTY OF ANOKA MUNICIPALITY By: By: Dan Erhart, Chairman Anoka County Board of Commissioners (Title): Dated: Dated: AlTEST: By: (Title) : By: John "Jay" Mclinden County Administrator Dated: Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Assistant Anoka County Attorney The above agreement is hereby approved by the Commissioner of Revenue this day of , 1989. Commissioner of Revenue (DV\Contract\Assmagrm) o o JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOCAL UNIT AND COUNTY FOR ASSESSMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into by and between the Ci ty _ of Andover , hereinafter referred to as MUNICIPALITY, and the County of Anoka, a political subdivision under the laws of the State of Minnesota, 325 East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, this 23 day of January , 1989. WHEREAS, the Municipality wishes to enter into an agreement with the County to provide for the assessment of the property in said Municipality by the County Assessor, and; WHEREAS, it is the wish of said County to cooperate with said Municipality to provide for a fair and equitable assessment of said property; and WHEREAS, said work shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. ~ 471 .59. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED, IT IS AGREED AS FOllOWS: 1. That said municipality constitutes a separate assessment district which lies in this County and that all property in the geographical boundaries of this district shall be assessed by the County Assessor of the County beginning with the assessment of the year 1991 providing this agreement is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. 2. It is further agreed that the office of the local assessor of the Municipality having been abolished, pursuant to prior agreement and the approval of the Commissioner of Revenue, shall cease to exist for the duration of this agreement, which shall be until January 15, 1996. 3. In consideration for said assessment services, the Municipality hereby agrees to pay the County an annual payment to be paid to the County Treasurer on or before January 15 as follows: 1991 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1991 1992 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1992 1993 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1993 1994 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1994 1995 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1995 1996 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1996 The assessment payment shall be based on the number of parcels in the preceding assessment and on the following computations: A. 1991 Assessment, payable in 1991 - $8.51 for each improved parcel of residential, seasonal recreational residential and agricultural type of property, plus $18.16 for each improved parcel of commercial, industrial and public utility type of property, plus $2.25 for each vacant parcel of property. 8. The same procedure shall be used as described in Section 3, Subd. A for computation of the assessment payments due in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 and o o - 2 - 1996 except the rate shall be adjusted according to the Anoka County cost of living and merit adjustments from January 1 to December 31 in the year the assessment is performed. 4. Notwithstanding paragraph 2 above, Municipality or Anoka County shall have the right to terminate this agreement on or before December 31 of the year prior to the year in which termination shall be effective. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below: COUNlY OF ANOKA MUNICIPALllY By: By: Dan Erhart, Chairman Anoka County Board of Commissioners (Title).: Dated: Dated: ATTEST: By: (Title): By: John "Jay" Mclinden County Administrator Dated: Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Assistant Anoka County Attorney The above agreement is hereby approved by the Commissioner of Revenue this day of , 1989. Commissioner of Revenue (DV\Contract\Assmagrm) o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Februarv 7. AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Commission_ ITEM pprove Law NO. Contract. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering BY:James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the attached Enforcement Contract. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY iO .JE Office of jz-o;tr ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT KENNETH G. WILKINSON - SHERIFF to cC ~/~1 Courthouse - 325 East Main Street - Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612-421-4760 R~ gl~U January 17, 1989 City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Anoka, MN. 55303 CITY OF ANDOVER Dear Mayor and Council Members: Enclosed are three copies of the Law Enforcement Contract for 1989. After you have reviewed this contract, and if it is satisfactory, please sign the copies and return them to me. I will send back to you a fully signed copy after the completion of the other required signatures. If you have any questions, please call me at 421-4760, extension 1208. Sincerely, K.G. Wilkinson Sheriff ~~d By: Harold Netkow Captain, Administration HN/ba Attach. o Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer o ''-.- o ~ LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1989, by and between the COUNTY OF ANOKA and the ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF, herein after referred to as the "COUNTY" and the CITY OF ANDOVER, hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY", for the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Municipality is desirous of entering into a contract with the County, through the Office of the County Sheriff, for the performance of the law enforcement functions hereinafter described within the corporate limits of said Municipality; and WHEREAS, the county is agreeable to and law enforcement functions on the hereinafter set forth; and rendering such services terms and conditions WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by M.S. Sec. 471.59 and M,S. 436.05; NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid statutes, and in consideration of the mutual covenants expressed herein, it is agreed as follows: 1. PURPOSE The County, through its County Sheriff, agrees to provide police protection within the corporate limits of the Municipality to the extent and in the manner as hereinafter set forth. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY COUNTY A, Except as otherwise hereinafter specifically set forth, such services shall encompass the duties and functions of the type normally coming within the jurisdiction of the Anoka County Sheriff pursuant to Minnesota Law, and in addition, the Sheriff and his duly assigned deputies shall, within the Municipality's corporate limits, exercise all the police powers and duties of city police officers as provided by M.S. 436.05, B. The rendition of services, the standard of performance, the discipline of the deputies, and other matters incident to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed, shall remain in and under the sole control of the Sheriff. 1 o C. Such services shall include the enforcement of the Minnesota State statutes, and the municipal ordinances of the city of Andover. ',-----, D. The County shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, and communication facilities for dispatching, jail detention (including the cost of such detention), and daily patrol service as specified in Paragraph 2.E. of this Agreement, and shall be responsible for the direct payment of any salaries, wages, or other compensation to any County personnel performing services pursuant to this contract. E. The County agrees to provide law enforcement protection as follows: For the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989, the Sher:j.ff's Office will provide thirty-two (32) hours per day of daily patrol service 365 days per year. Said daily patrol service shall be exercised through the employment of two patrol cars, to be supplied, equipped, and maintained by the County, and staffed by Sheriff's deputies. Further, said daily patrol service will provide and fulfill those services and duties ordinarily provided and fulfilled by city police officers as provided by state law and municipal ordinances. The Sheriff, upon consultation with the Law Enforcement Committee created pursuant to Paragraph 6 herein, shall determine the time of the day during which the patrol service shall be provided. The Sheriff may periodically change the times of patrol service in order to enhance the effectiveness of the coverage. F. The County patrol cars used for providing the services pursuant to the CONTRACT, shall be stored on premises owned by the Municipality. In the event that a suitable and secure storage location is not provided, in the determination of the Sheriff, the patrol cars will be returned to the Sheriff I s Office at the end of each shift. 3. DUTIES OF MUNICIPALITY A. It is agreed that the Sheriff shall have all reasonable and necessary cooperation and assistance from the Municipality, its officers, agents, and employees, so as to facilitate the performance of this agreement. B. This contract shall not alter the responsibility for prosecution of offenses occurring within the Municipality as is currently provided by law, Likewiser collection and distribution of fine monies shall be controlled in the manner provided by law. o 2 o o 4. COMPENSATION/TERM The Municipality hereby agrees to pay to the County the sum of $371,838,00 for law enforcement protection as herein specified for the year 1989, said contract sum is payable in four (4) equal installments with the first installment due on April 1, 1989, with remaining installments due on July 1, 1989, october 1, 1989, and December 3l, 1989. 5 . RENEWAL This contract may be renewed for a successive period of one (1) year. said renewal shall be accomplished in the following manner: A. Not later than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the expiration of the current contract, the county, through its County sheriff, shall notify the Municipality of its intention to renew. said notification shall include notice of any increase in total contract cost. B. Not later than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the current contract, the Municipality shall notify the Sheriff of its intention to renew and its acceptance of increased costs. C. The renewal shall be officially approved by the parties' respective governing bodies prior to expiration of the current contract. 6. LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE The County, through its county Sheriff or his designees, agrees to meet, from time to time, with any duly designated law enforcement committee of the Municipality. The purpose of said meetings shall be to make suggestions for improvement in the implementation of this contract or for amendments thereto, provided, however, that no such suggestion or amendment shall be binding on either party until reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties hereto. The membership of said committee, and the time and place of said meetings, shall be determined by the Municipality with reasonable notice to the Sheriff. 7 . DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS All funds disbursed by the County or the Municipality pursuant to this Agreement shall be disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law. 3 o '--- o 8. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds, and reports of all receipts and disbursements shall be made upon request by either party. 9. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION In accordance with Anoka County's Affirmative Action Policy and the county Commissioners' policies against discrimination, no person shall illegally be excluded from full-time employment rights in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subj ected to discrimination in the program which is the subject of this Agreement on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, disability, or national origin, 10 . TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated by either party at any time with or without cause upon not less than 120 days written notice delivered by mail or in person to the other party. Notices delivered by mail, shall be deemed to be received two (2) days after mailing. such termination shall not be effective with respect to services rendered prior to such notice of termination. 11. NOTICE For purposes of delivering any notices hereunder, notice shall be effective delivered to the Anoka county Sheriff, 325 East Main street, Anoka, MN. 55303, on behalf of the county; and the city Manager of the city of Andover, 1685 crosstown Boulevard N.W., Anoka,'MN. 55303, on behalf of the Municipality, 12. INDEMNIFICATION The City of Andover and the County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs, expenses, or damages, injuries or sickness resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective. offices, agents, or employees, relating to the activities conducted by either party under this agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this agreement supersedes all oral and written agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subj ect matter hereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect between the parties relating to the 4 o "--' o subject matter thereof. Any modifications of the provisions of only when they have been reduced to parties herein. alterations, variations, or this Agreement shall be valid writing and duly signed by the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipality, city of Andover, by resolution duly adopted by its governing body, has caused this agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its clerk, and the COUNTY OF ANOKA, by resolution of the county Board of Commissioners, has caused this agreement to be signed by the Anoka County Sheriff, the Chairman of the Anoka county Board of commissioners, and attested by the County Administrator, all on the day and year first above written. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA Mayor Chairman, Anoka county Board of commissioners ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk John "Jay" McLinden County Administrator Anoka County sheriff Approval of form and execution: Assistant Anoka County Attorney 5 o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE F'phrn~ry 7 1 qRq AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Fire Department ITEM Insurance/Fire Dept. NO. BY: V. Volk Bob Palmer asked that this item be discussed by Council. Recently, a fire fighter had his pager and amplifier stolen from his home while he was on vacation. His insurance company only paid him $200; he paid the city $250 which is the amount of our deductible. Mr. Palmer would like to know if the Council wants to pay for stolen equipment that personnel are required to carry as most homeowner's insurance does not pay fully for this type of equipment or if the city wants to have a rider on their insurance policy. Bob will be at the meeting to discuss this item. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY ,0 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 7, 1989 DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning Jay Blak ~ne' BY: ~~Plar ITEM NO. AEDC Report FOR AGENDA SECTION NO. staff, Committee, The Andover Economic Development Committee (AEDC) met on January 31, 1989 to discuss organizational items and review economic development efforts within Andover. The AEDC brings together talented individuals from very diverse fields, including: banking, accounting, public relations, education, architecture, government and small businesses. I have included a listing of members. The AEDC has been organized to review development efforts, help manage growth, promote commercial and industrial growth. The Committee will be meeting on February 16, 1989 to begin drafting a city promotional brochure to assist with the marketing of the Andover Commercial Park. MOTION BY o TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o ANDOVER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 1989 - MEMBERSHIP Chairman Michael Knight 4622 - 175th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 Hm. 42l-9247/Wk. 753-2800 Members Thomas Gerster l4l0 - 138th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 Hm. 755-3073/Wk. 339-4200 Don Jacobson 14826 University Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 Hm. 434-3401/Wk. 441-312l Lon Helgemo, President st. Anthony Nat'l Bank Andover, MN 55304 421-0198 Gregg Kroll 14933 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Hm. 757-7684/Wk. 780-2160 Howard Neisen 13928 wintergreen St. NW Andover, MN 55304 Hm. 755-5073/Wk. 635-7266 Rebecca Pease 3300 - 152nd Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 Hm. 427-1845/Wk. 829-1458 o o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Engineering ~~ AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, DATE Februar 7 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM Report on Traffic NO. Study/County Roads BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to review the attached results of .he studies the City requested of the Anoka County Highway Department during 1988 for speed zoning. The only speed change is on a small segment of Crosstown Boulevard in front of City Hall. The speed limit has been reduced to 45 mph from 50 mph. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY , ". MnjDOT 29213 (12-78) ((i' "'~ o STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION page..L-- of !....-..Pages LOCAL STREET OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION Road Authority . Anoka County I Date January ), 1982~'~.., Road Name or No. C . S . A. H . ". 16, CO.. Rd. l8, Co. Rd. 16 (Bunker Lake Blvd. ) Termini of Zone: From C.S.A.H. 9 . To I Date of Request Jefferson St. N.E. September 13, 1988 Kindly make the following changes in speed limits on the above-referenced section. Changes authorized herein are in accordance with Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act, M.S. Chapter 169.14 and applicable subdivisions thereof. CSAH 16 50 miles per hour between the intersection with County State Aid Highway 9 and the terminus point with County Road l8. County Road 18 50 miles per hour between the terminus point with County State Aid Highway 16 and the terminus point with County Road 116. County Road 116 50 miles per hour between the terminus point with County Road l8 and a point approximately 450 feet east of the intersection with Xavis Street. 55 miles per hour between a point approximatelY 450 feet east of the intersection with Xavis Street and the intersection with Jefferson Street N.E. Please Sign _ Here ",. (3) White - Road Authority (1) Pink - Central Office Traffic glue - District Traffic Engineer for Road Authority use only Date traffic control devices changed implementing this authorization I Month-Day.Year I Signature I Title Mn/DOT 29213 (12-78) STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION o t8' ~~ Page ~ of 2:...-. Pages LOCAL STREET OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION Road Authority Anoka Count Road Name or No. "COunty Road 18 Termini of Zone: From County State Aid Highway 16 To County State Aid Highway 20 Date of Request August 23, 1988 Kindly make the following changes in speed limits on the above-referenced section. Changes authorized herein are in accordance with Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act. M.S. Chapter 169.14 and applicable subdivisions thereof. , 50 miles per hour between the north intersection with County State Aid Highway 16 and a point approximately 750 feet south of the intersection with County Road 109 (Nightingale Street). 45 miles per hour between a point approximately 750 feet south of the intersection with County Road 109 and the intersection with County State Aid Highway 78. .' 50 miles per hour between the intersection with County State Aid Highway 78 and the intersection with County State Aid Highway 20. (3) White - Road Authority (1) Pink - Central Office Traffic ) BI.u~ -:- pi$trict Traffic E,:,gi!,eer _ r'Road Author,ity use onfy'.,:" " _ . -. Date traffic control devices changed implementing this authorization' I Month-Day-Year I Signature I Title o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, DATE February 7, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Public Works OR ITEM NO. /fS High Band Radio BY:Frank O. stone The City Council is requested to approve the installation of high band radios in Frank Stone and David Almgren's vehicles. The sheriff's department has asked if it would possible for David Almgren, being he is the Assistant Civil Defense Director, and Frank Stone to have high band radios installed in their vehicles so that we can have close contact with each other. With these radios, the Civil Defense Director, Sheriff's Department, Fire Department, and the Public Works Department can all be in voice contact for any problems such as visual breaking and entering, house fires or broken watermains and damaged street signs, etc. The City Hall base radio is a low band radio, and so are all the remotes. The Police and Fire Departments operate on high band radios. The Andover Sheriff's car has the Fire Department's channel 2 installed in their high band radio. Bob palmer said that he would have no problem with us using their channel 2 for emergency problems. I have priced out the radios at $850.00 each. Mr. Almgren would have the money in the Civil Defence budget. Public Works would have to use $200.00 from operating supplies of budgets: Streets & Highways, Parks, Street Signs General, Snow & Ice Removal, and balance from the Water Department. Being these radios were not budgeted for in the 1989 budget, we need the Councils okay before anything further can be done. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o o DATE; JA~UAW~ 31, 1~8Y SUBJECT; Hi ~ANU RADiUS. iT HAS CO~!E '!'() MY ATTEN'l iON THAT "fHt.!U; IS A f'!J::r.:ll TO ESTABLiSH A "lEANS, OW ~IETHOll TU COf'IMUN!CATJ:: WiTHIN THE C i TYS EfilJ:;HOENCY SEW V I Cl::S, i ~ THE PAb'!' WE ,'-IJ:Ellt:Ll TO U~~E A. TELLPHUNE 'ro CALL AND RELAY INfUWMATION BJ::TWtEN OUR EMEHUENC~ SERVICES ON USE THE SERViCES Of CtN'!'HAL (.:ONMUNlr.:AT iUi\!S, !'HI S SYSTEM WAS OJ:-"l't:'I bl"OW i\NLl ALLm\lED fOR LOS'!' OR iil! SL1! !U::CTED COMMUN I CAT! tINS. '\10'1'1.'0 MENT .11)[\1 nH:: DAN- (c~J:-J~Ot.!6 OW HA6Al-WOUb S I 'l'1.-,!3.'l' I UN T!il\T CUULD HAV!: HESliLTJ::U AFfECTING THE E~1PLUYEE MJi.! IN THE CITL~ENS Of OUR C!TY, '10 t\j-;'j'Tl:;H SENI;E OUR CiTY ,1\,\lU iTS CJ.TIL;ENS .l J:'.t'EL '1'HA'l' iNSTALLiNG A HI BANU NADiO !N OUR PUBLIC ~UNKS SUPr.:RViSO~S TRUCK WOULD TiE .I N ALL OUl{ !::\HANCHt:~ OF E:"'WPGENCY '';1:;;{V.I CES AND WE ALL COULD USL THE EXiSTING CHANNEL THAT THb ~lRE UEPM?TMEN'r USES AS '!'HJ::RE WO.~K.lNU CHANN1::L, I\I'.,U ONl:: THAT 'l'Htc OIJ;{ POLICH DEPAR'I.'l"lEN'I.' ALRtAU'! USj-;S TO cor'j!'IIJ~"H:ATE TO TH.!: f!RE, AND RESCUE DHPAR1~ENTS. 1 N effect i nE 'i'H i S CI-IANt\E ! '1 WOIJ LD M 1 N ! lYI.l ;Gt: THE COST TO "I'HH CITYS TAXPAYERS !-\ND INCREAS.t niE .t.':fECTIVENE:;,:; OF THE CITYS SERVICES FUR THE CITY, AND ITS1'AXPAYERS, S.lNCt;!~ELY YOUR~, ANDOVER DEPUTY SHERIFF ""PU'IV ";JIZ o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Februarv 7. 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT FOR AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, ~~ Commission 010\ Administration ITEM NQ Fire Marshal posi tion BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to select a Fire Marshal from the two candidates submitted by the Fire Department. Both candidates received the same number of votes. Joyce Noyes Dave Reitan Attached is the Job Description for the Fire Marshal position as revised by the Personnel Committee (Don & Mike). Attached are the resumes. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY of ANDOVER MEMORANDUM Fire Marshal position TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: Bob Palmer James E. Schrantz Februar 1 1989 Attached is the Fire Marshal Job Description as revised by the Personnel Committee. It cleans up the language. I didn't see where it changed the duties of the position. It doesn't address the organizational structure. It only shows the position is responsible to the Fire Chief and Administrator. .0 CITY OF ANDOVER ~ POSITION TITLE: POSITION DESCRIPTION FIRE MARSHAL DEPARTMENT: FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTABLE TO: FIRE CHIEF & CITY ADMINISTRATOR PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF POSITION To develop, apply and administer City fire safety standards in the City of Andover in a manner which will safeguard lives and property. The Fire Marshal shall participate in the investigation of all fires of questionable origin in the City of Andover. To coordinate and direct fire prevention efforts as the Fire Prevention Public Information Officer for the City. MAJOR AREAS OF ACCOUNTABILITY Prepares, implements and administers a fire and safety inspection program to ensure that facilities and structures conform with municipal codes and applicable State regulations. Develops and carries out an effective inspection program covering commercial, industrial, multiple dwellings, schools, churches, and public buildings throughout the City for the purpose of fire prevention. Examines building plans for conformity with the fire prevention codes and coordinates inspections with building, electrical, plumbing and heating inspectors. participates in the investigation of all fires of questionable origin with the Sheriff's Department and the State Fire Marshal's Office to determine the cause of fires. Prepares comprehensive reports on fires as required by the City and State Fire Marshal's Office. Prepares monthly reports summarizing inspections, investigations, fire and fire prevention activities. Submits budget requests for inclusion in the annual budget. ~ Department Head Effective Date PAGE 1 OF 3 c Recommends changes to fire ordinances and codes. Reports violations of other municipal codes found during inspections and fire investigation duties to appropriate parties for corrective action. Conducts training on the use of fire extinguishers, evacuations, and fire prevention for industries, nursing homes, schools and other groups. Keeps abreast of changes in fire codes, building codes, fire prevention practices and construction materials. Reviews all development proposals for fire safety and prepares a report on fire safety implications. Assists the Fire Chief in maintaining contact with the Fire Insurance Rating Bureau to ensure best possible rating. Assists the Fire Chief in the preparation of the Master Fire Plan covering all aspects of firefighting and prevention. Serves as a member and resource person to the Safety Committee. Cooperates with the Fire Chief and Training Officer in establishing fire suppression pre-plan for all commercial and industrial buildings. Performs other duties as delegated. E~PLES OF PERFORMANCE CRIT~RIA ***Conducts inspections in a businesslike and impartial manner. ***Recognizes potential fire hazards and follows through to see corrective action is taken. ***Communicates tactfully and effectively with property owners and contractors. ***Makes periodic inspections in accordance with specified duties. ***Keeps informed of changes in regulatory codes and the interpretation of same. RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORK OF OTHERS None. o PAGE 2 OF 3 o MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE High school graduate. Training in fire service or closely related fields. A combination of four years in firefighting, either full-time, part-time, or volunteer, and/or in fire prevention and inspection activities. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES Considerable knowledge of principles, practices, methods, techniques, equipment, tools and sciences applied to fire prevention and investigation. Full knowledge of relevant City and state fire codes, and regulations in the area of fire prevention or investigation. Ability to do complex fire prevention and investigation work. Ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with others. Ability to express oneself clearly and concisely both orally and in writing. Considerable knowledge of the geography of the City and location of hydrants, buildings and special areas requiring special pre- fire control planning, inspection and firefighting techniques. Considerable knowledge of first-aid and the uses of first aid equipment. Be physically able to perform the duties outlined. SALARY Salary is subject to adjustment after a probationary period based on performance review and as set forth in Andover Personnel policies. o PAGE 3 OF 3 a CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. DATE February 7, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administration ITEM Cable Commissioner NO. a3 BY: V. Yolk Andover has two representatives on the Cable Commission. Melinda Coleman is one of the representatives and Don Jacobson was the other. Mr. Jacobson has resigned his position on the Cable Commission. Does the Council want staff to advertise for someone to fill Don's place? COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7. lqAq ITEM NO. APPROVE~R AGEN~~ \ \ , , " BY: 1,) . The City Council is requested to approve the renaming of Rum River Forest Park to strootman Park in memory of Larry strootman. ~LJ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Public Works AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Commi ttee, Commission 76 Rename Park BY: Frank O. Stone This is the closest park to his home. In the early summer, the Commission would like to have the strootman family, Mayor, Council, and Park Board at this park for a dedication ceremony for the name change. c MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE Februar 7 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administration R ITEM NO. Work Session <95 BY: James E. Schrantz The city Council is requested to schedule a work session to discuss the funding of the water system improvements of: Well Tower Water Treatment etc. The work session will be scheduled for February 16, 1989. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE Februarv 7, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Non-Discussion I Re Oaks 6th Addn./ Feasibility Report/ 89-4 6lla Engineering BY: James E. Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting the Feasibility study, Waiving the Public Hearing and ordering the improvement and directing the preparation of plans and specs for Project 89-4 for Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain and Streets with Concrete Curb and Gutter for Red Oaks 6th Addition. The developers are Art Raudio and Norm Holm. The developer is required to escrow $lO,OOO for plans and specs. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA o RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT 89-4 FOR WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN, AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING AREA RED OAKS 6TH ADDITION. WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 20th day of December, 1988, Resolution No. 285-88, order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and presented to the Council on the l7th day of January, 1989; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $202,540.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated total cost of improvements of $202,540.00, waive the Public Hearing and order improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby require the developer to escrow the sum of $10,000.00 with such payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and specifications. MOTION seconded by Councilman City Council at a 19 with Councilmen Meeting this and adopted by the day of voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o Jerry Windschitl - Mayor victoria Volk - City Clerk ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 7. 1 QRQ AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ITEM NO. Accept Easement./ 87-11; 88-5 BY: {i,7 James E The City Council is requested to accept the easement" for Project 87-11/88-5. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY Form No. 31.M -QUIT CLAIM DEED r-- C~riiorailo;;'()r Partnarship I to Corporation or Partnership I Minnesota Unifonn Conveyanc1n. Blanks (1978) Miller.Oavis Co., Minneapolis .-. .--.----. - m_ ..-- -'1 ! i No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 County Auditor by De uty STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ EXEMPT Date: January 13 1989 , - (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Hills. Inc. under the laws of Minnesota the City of Andover a municipal corporation Anoka ,a corporation , Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to , Grantee, , real property in under the laws of Minnesota County, Minnesota, described as follows: See reverse side for complete legal. (if more space is needed, continue on back) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here I I I I 1--- STATE OF MINNESOT COUNTY OF _ o The foregoip- by J. J the~r of_o undeyiU ::i ',; .' 1. A 60 foot temporary easement to terminate on January 1, 1991 for utility easement purposes situated in. the North 1/2 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 35, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota being 30 feet wide on each side of the following described linea . ,,'. o Commencing at the intersection of South Coon Creek Drive and l40th Avenue NW as now platted in the Bills of Bunker Lake, City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota, thence north 56 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds west, along proposed South Coon Creek Drive, a distance of 171.54 feet to the point of beginning of a 23.76 degree curve to the left, having a radius of 238.24 and a central angle of 23 degrees 42 minu tes 20 seconds, thence continuing along sa id curve a distance of 98.57 feet, thence north 80 degrees 10 minutes 27 seconds west a distance of 246.24 feet to the point of beginning of a 8.29 deg ree curve to the left, having a radius of 676.09 and a central angle of 8 degrees 27 minutes 33 seconds, thence continuing along said curve a distance of 99.82 feet, thence north 88 degrees 38 minutes 00 seconds west a distance of 244.06 feet to the point of intersection with Crane Street NW, thence south 0 degrees 10 minutes 48 seconds west a distance of 131.09 feet to the point of beginning of a 34.29 degree curve to the right having a radius of 166.00 and a central angle of 56 degrees 55 minutes 49 seconds, thence continuing along said curve a distance of 164.94 feet, thence south 57 degrees 06 minutes 37 seconds west a distance of 52.03 feet to the point of beginning of a 50.77 degree curve to the left having a radius of 1l2.55 and a central angle of 38 degrees 10 minutes 57 seconds, thence continuing aong said curve a distance of 75.06 feet and there terminating. 2. Together with a 20 foot temporary easement to terminate January 1, 1991 being six feet wide on the westerly side and 14 feet wide on the easterly side of the following described linea Commencing at the intersection of South Coon Creek Drive and Crane Street NW thence north 88 degrees 38 minutes 00 seconds west a distance of 5.94 feet, thence north 1 deg=.ee 22 minutes 00 seconds east a distance of 30 feet to the point of beginning, thence continuing along last described _. line a distan......~^1' 1 't"_-A_n__I'_~~_"___~_'" .....--- ..___J__....:-- NOTICE IS Anoka, St-. 19_, Da tet" ,-. .~ .-.0 ~<: ~;.-:)~~:\.~::.~:.~..:. .': .... " . ......... . ';":'.. '.,.; ...::. . -- o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE February 7, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Item Engineering ITEM NO. Approve Final Payments -,~~ 6J BY: James E. Schrantz The city Council is requested to approve the resoluti n accepting the work and directing final payment to C.W. Houle for project 87- 11, School Trunk project. The final payment is for $91,604.46. The contractor has provided a $50,000 two-year bond to cover items on the final punch list that we want to review in one year and again in two years. MOTION BY TO COUNCil ACTION SECOND BY o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO C.W. HOULE FOR PROJECT NO. 87-11 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER TRUNK CONSTRUCTION IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: ANDOVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Andover on April 19, 1988, C.W. Houle of Shoreview has satisfactorily completed the construction in accordance with such contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, Minnesota. The work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City directed to issue a proper order for the contract, taking the contractor's receipt Clerk and Mayor are hereby final payment on such in full. MOTION seconded by Councilman City Council at a and adopted by the day Meeting this of , 19 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor victoria Volk -City Clerk ~KDA T.OL TZ. KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED NGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101,1893 612/292,4400 FAX 612/29200083 February 1, 1989 Honorable Mayor and City Council Andover, Minnesota Re: Final Payment Elementary School Util ity Improvements ProJ ect 87-11 Andover, Minnesota Commission No. 8932-02 Dear Mayor and Council: The contractor has compl eted work on the above referenced project, except for several clean-up items. These punch I ist items are to be completed in the spring. The contractor has provided the City with a $50,000 two-year bond to cover punch I ist work, and to q>ver televising the sanitary sewer in 1989 and 1990 to review pipe and Joint conditions. We recommend final payment to C.W. Houle in the amount of $91,604.46. The final contract cost was slightly less than the original contract, Including change orders. P.E. Jffi:J ' cc: Shirley CI inton, Andover o Q CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE Februarv 7. 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Item Eng inee ring ITEM NO. Declare Costs Clq BY: James E. Schran The City Council is requested to approve the resolutions declaring the cost and directing the preparation of assessments and a resolution ordering a hearing on proposed assessments for projects: 88-13 87-27 88-19 88-11 88-7 88-6 88-5 87-32 87-2l Creekhaven Woodland Creek Woodland Creek 2nd Hidden Creek East Brandon's Lakeview Estates Kensington Estates 3rd Addition Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd Addition Winslow Hills Oak Bluff 2nd MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR PROJECT NO. 88-13, CREEKHAVEN. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $91,255.07, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $22,194.96 and work previously done amount to $23,092.10 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $l36,542.13. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: l. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $7,250.32 and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $129,291.8l. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.44 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this , 19 day of with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER c:> ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. <:)MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-13. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for project No. 88-13; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: l. A hearing shall be held the 28th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at 9:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 3l of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 3l of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19___ voting with Councilmen in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor o Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. c:> MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 88-11, HIDDEN CREEK EAST 1ST ADDITION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $272,l92.02, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $59,540.00 and work previously done amount to $9,924.05 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $34l,656.07. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $7,549.52 and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $334,106.55. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.44 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 wi th Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER o ATTEST: James E. Elling- Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. C:>MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-11. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 88-11; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: l. A hearing shall be held the 28th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at 9:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October l5 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19___ voting with Councilmen in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER AND STREETS CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 88-7, BRANDON'S LAKEVIEW ESTATES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $30,183.60 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $7,355.00 and work previously done amount to $6,149.24 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $43,687.84. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $13,984.84 and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $29,703.00. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.44 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this , 19 day of with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. C:>MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-7. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 88-7; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: l. A hearing shall be held the 28th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at 9:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 3l of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19~, with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 88-6, KENSINGTON ESTATES 3RD ADDITION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $191,560.60, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $51,230.08 and work previously done amount to $48,427.15 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $292,398.98. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $292,398.98. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.44 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the city Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. C:>MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 88-6. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for project No. 88-6; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 28th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at 9:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 3l of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19___ voting with Councilmen in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. o MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR PROJECT NO. 88-5, HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 3RD ADDITION. ---- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $353,900.01, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $80,709.63 and work previously done amount to $141,318.10 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $575,927.74. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $575,927.74. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.44 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER c:> ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. C:>MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-5. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 88-5~ and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 28th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at 8:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the Ci~y Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. o MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR PROJECT NO. 87-32, WINSLOW HILLS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $384,981.18, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $81,155.12 and work previously done amount to $347,830.46 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $813,966.76. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $813,966.76. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.44 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER c:> ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. C:>MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT NO. 87-32. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost, of improvements for Project No. 87-32; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 28th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19___ voting with Councilmen in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. o MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR PROJECT NO. 87-21, OAK BLUFF 2ND ADDITION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $280,281.27, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $60,840.23 and work previously done amount to $250,201.40 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $591,322.90. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $3,601.58 and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $587,721.32. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.44 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER o ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. <:LOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT NO. 87-21. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements Project No. 87-21; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 2&th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o James E. Elling ~ Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. o MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR PROJECT NO. 87-27, WOODLAND CREEK. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $549,657.04, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $104,361.39 and work previously done amount to $55,927.75 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $709,946.18. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $2,546.71 and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $707,399.47. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.44 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER c:> ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. 4:>MOTIONbY Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT NO. 87-27. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 87-27; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 28th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 3l of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 3l of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Meeting this day of , 19___ voting Council at a with Councilmen in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. o MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR PROJECT NO. 88-19, WOODLAND CREEK 2ND ADDITION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $276,918.49, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $46,574.86 and work previously done amount to $9,712.90 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $333,206.25. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $1,259.67 and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $331,946.58. 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8.5 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19 with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER o ATTEST: James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. C:>MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT NO. 88-19. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on February 7, 1989, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a .proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 88-19; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 28th day of February, 1989, in the City Hall at P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Meeting this day of , 19___ voting with Councilmen in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: o James E. Elling - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Fehrlli'l ry 7 1 QAQ AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Non Order Public Hearing/ "No Wake Ordinance" ~O BY: James E Engineering The City Council is requested to order an informational hearing for the "No Wake" Ordinance proposed by the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization. At the last public meeting, the Council told the people attending the meeting that the City would notify them of the revised proposed ordinance. See the attached revised ordinance. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY LAW Of"FICES o WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWO D... ElITZ i JA -'] ( ) 338.4200 January 23, 198 N 2" 1989' A NUMBER ~., t;. I 338-2625 CITy O;;----J ANDOVER A. THOMAS WURST, P.A, CURTIS A. PEARSON. P.A. ~AMES D. LARSON, P.A, THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD, P.A. CRAIG M. MERTZ ROGER oJo FELLOWS Mr. James E. Schrantz Chairman, Lower Rum River Water 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, Minnesota 55304 Management Organization Re: Erosion Control Ordinance - No Wake - Waterskiing Dear Jim: At the monthly meeting on January 18, 1989, the commissioners discussed the proposed ordinance relating to erosion controls and operating restrictions on the Lower Rum River. In essence as I understood the commission it was to put in a no wake ordinance and to restrict waterskiing on the Rum River within areas which the municipalities would designate. John Weaver indicated that as far as the City of Anoka was concerned they wanted a no wake ordinance and wanted to limit waterskiing from the confluence of the Mississippi River with the Rum River upstream to the Anoka municipal boundary. I understand there are areas where the river is a dividing line between municipalities and this becomes a little cumbersome in that hopefully the other cities who share a boundary with Anoka will feel similar to Mr. Weaver that the restriction should apply throughout the entire reach of the river. I was directed to prepare an ordinance and transmit it to each of you along with a suggested resolution for your council consideration. I have prepared an ordinance and the ordinance would be adopted by Anoka County and not by the individual cities. I have changed the discussion from a no wake to a minimum wake because as I pointed out at the meeting it would be impossible for any prosecutor to work with a no wake ordinance since every object moving along the river will leave some wake. I also agree that we don I t have a good definition for a minimum wake and looking at some of the discussion from various meetings with citizens, I see comments that 10 horse and 15 horse motors don't leave a wake which does damage to the banks. From my own personal exper ience I find that hard to believe having lived along a body of water for a long period of time and noticing the effect of wake from even slower moving boats. '0 Jim, I've done the best I can under the constraints which the commission discussed. It is my understanding you do not want to put on a speed limitation nor a motor size limitation and therefore it is hopeful that a minimum wake and a waterskiing restr icti ve ordinance will cut back substantially on the damage to the banks of the Rum River. These o o WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ restrictions with the proper signing and enforcement hopefully will satisfy all sides on this issue. I am sending a copy of this letter to each of the commissioners along with copies of the proposed ordinance and the proposed resolution for adoption by their city councils. If you gentlemen find this to be in order I suggest you discuss it with your councils and then bring back completed resolutions for your next monthly meeting so that you can transmit onto the county resolutions from the four communities along with a suggested ordinance. It will then be up to the county board if they wish to adopt the ordinance. I am also sending a copy of this communication along with the ordinance and resolution to Jon Christensen, Environmental Services, Anoka County, 325 East Main, Anoka, Minnesota. Mr. Christensen being at our meeting indicated he would like to be kept advised as the communities proceed. If any of you have any questions concerning the proposed ordinance or resolution, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly your9,j ,. I /'-1 /- ./ (Ii,," /',/ // V/{A.'i (:1-/ (..lift.. _1:'/1.' iI.,.~- Curtis A. Pearson CAP:lkg Enclosures cc: Mr. Pete Raatikka Mr. John Weaver Mr. Torn Mathisen Ms. Mava Mikkonen Mr. Jon Christensen o ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING EROSION CONTROLS AND LIMITING THE WAKE FROM BOATS AND WATERSKIING ON THE LOWER RUM RIVER Anoka County does ordain: Section is hereby added to the County's Code of Ordinances) and shall read as follows: Water Craft - Erosion = Lower Rum River Section 1. Purpose. The limi tations contained in this ordinance are designed to prevent and limit the erosion which is occurring to the banks and shoreline of the Lower Rum River. The heavy wake from boats creates wave action which is eroding the shoreline, banks, and bluffs along the river and is adverse to the public's interest in maintaining and preserving the shoreline. Swimmers, people canoeing, and other people using the river more passively are placed in jeopardy by fast boats and wave actions, and this ordinance is designed to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the public. Section 2. Requlations. A. Minimum Wake Restrictions. No person shall navigate, place, maintain, or operate any boat, motor boat, or watercraft of any kind upon the Rum River in the areas herein designated quiet waters at a speed which results in more than a minimum wake. B. Waterskiinq Restricted. No person shall navigate or operate any boat or watercraft pulling a water skier nor shall anyone engage in waterskiing in a quiet waters area as defined herein. C. Quiet Waters Areas. 1. All that part of the Rum River from its confluence with the Mississippi River upstream to the City of Anoka's municipal boundary shall be considered a quiet water. 2. That part to shall be considered of the Rum River from in the Ci ty of Ramsey a quiet water. o 3. That part of the Rum River from to in the City of Andover shall be considered a quiet water. o D. Siqns Postinq. The Sher iff or County Administrator shall provide for the erection of signs at all public accesses and at other appropr iate locations along the Rum River to inform operators of watercraft of the wake! limitation and the waterskiing limitation applicable to this sensitive portion of the river. E. Operation of watercraft with which creates more than a minimum wake as allowed by this ordinance or any boat operator who pulls a water skier as prohibited by paragraph B is prima facie evidence that the watercraft is being operated in violation of this Ordinance. o o o ..... RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO ESTABLISHING EROSION CONTROLS AND LIMITING THE WAKE FROM BOATS AND WATERSKIING ON THE LOWER RUM RIVER AND ESTABLISHING QUIET WATER AREAS WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization has been contacted by property owners living on the Lower Rum River who are concerned by erosion of banks and shorelines abutting the River, and WHEREAS, boats creating a heavy wake have a negative effect on the safety of people canoeing, swimming, or passively using the River, and WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization has contacted the County of Anoka which has indicated that the County Board is willing to consider an ordinance limiting the wake of boats using the river and prohibiting waterskiing and if the County Board knows specifically what the Cities comprising the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization want the County Board to adopt, and WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization has studied the issue and has recommended to this Council a draft of a model ordinance to be presented to the Anoka County Board for adoption, and WHEREAS, this Council has reviewed the proposed ordinance and the provisions contained therein, NOW', THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of , as follows: 1. The recommendations of the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization for adoption of an ordinance establishing erosion controls and limiting the wake from boats and waterskiing behind boats operating on a portion of the Lower Rum River is deemed to be in the best interests of the public. 2. The attached proposed ordinance is hereby returned to the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization with the following suggested changes and the model ordinance should be sent on to Anoka County for adoption. This City Council approves the terms contained therein and agrees with the necessity for adopting such an ordinance. 3. The area to be designated as a quiet water within the corporate boundaries of the City of is as follows: = DATE: -0 February 7, 1989 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL : January Building Department Report : 1988 Building Department Report : Letter from William Hawkins (2/l/89) Cities Bulletin (1/27/89) : Letter from C.F. Smythe (1/30/89) (l2/12/88) 1.:J.!dlig / /q/g1 -I- '!fqh'1 : Coon Creek Watershed Board of Managers Minutes : Letter from John Rodeberg, TKDA (l/l8/89) : Letter from Ed Matthiesen, CCWD (1/11/89) Memo from Gary Englund, MN Dept. of Health (1/20/89) : Memo from George Steiner, Anoka County (1/23/89) : (1/5/89) Addendum to Park & Recreation Commission Minutes : Minutes - Andover Housing & Redevelopment (1/17/89) Minutes - Regular City Council Meeting (l/17/89) Minutes - Special City Council Meeting (1/19/89) Minutes - Regular Park & Rec. Meeting (1/19/89) Minutes - Planning & Zoning Meeting (1/24/89) : : : . . . . Resolution for proiect 88-5 adoptinq Assessment Roll Memo from Jim Schrantz re: Radium Tests (2/7/89) Cities Bulletin (2/3/89) Letter from A.M. Sannerud (1/31/89) T,PTTPr frC)m ('1 Pc) !';mi Tn,,'; ('](- ^' T,i'1da Sy"er5on (1/26/89) Letter from Norm Schiferl (1/31/89) : : PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR rUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. 4:> THANK YOU.