Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC May 5, 1998 I CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 Regular City Council Meeting - May 5, 1998 agenda Call to Order - Following the EDA meeting held at 7:00 PM Resident Forum Bookmark Agenda Approval Name Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes minutes Discussion Items 1. Rezoning/Cambridge Estates/Cambridge Capital Inc. rzcambridge 2. Preliminary Plat/Cambridge Estates/Cambridge Capital Inc. ppcambridge 3. Accept Petition/Order Feasibility Report/98-9/Cambridge Estates pet989 4. Discuss Trail Access/97-43/Hills of Bunker Lake disc9743 5. Accountant I Position acctl 6. Discuss Slow No-Wake Ordinance nowake Non-Discussion/Consent Items 7. Approve Equine Permit (yard requirements )/650 - 146th Ln NW /Gary Aus equine 8. Award Bid/97-34Narious Park Parking Lots and Field Improvements bid9734 9. Approve Financing of Street Lights/97-48/Rosella's Addition appr9748 10. Fire Department Secretary Replacement firesecty 11. Award Bid/Well #6 Wellhouse Design/97-46 bid9746 12. Approve Quoterrest Well/Well #7/97-12 qt97I2 13. Approve Change Orders/96-15/Public Works Expansion cos96IS 14. Amend 1998 Fee Schedule fee Mayor/Council Input Payment of Claims Adjournment .. . - .., -. ...-.--......, . ... ,.- I REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MA Y 5, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESIDENT FORUM ..................................................... 1 AGENDA APPROVAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 CONSENT AGENDA Approve equine permit/6S0 146th Lane NW/Gary Aus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 Resolution R083-98 awarding bidlIP97-34Narious park parking lots and field improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 Approve financing of street lightsIIP97-48/Rosella's Addition ................... 2 Fire Department secretary replacement (Jane Peterson) ........................ 2 Resolution R084-98 awarding bid/Well #6 well house design!IP97-46 ............. 2 Resolution R08S-98 approving quote/Test welllWell #71IP97-12 ................. 2 Resolution R086-98 approving Change Order #6!IP96-15 ...................... 2 Resolution R087-98 approving Change Order #2/IP96-1S ...................... 2 Resolution R088-98 approving Change Order # 1/IP96-1S ...................... 2 Resolution R089-98 approving Change Order #31IP96-1S ...................... 2 Resolution R090-98 amending 1998 fee schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 DISCUSS TRAIL ACCESS/IP97-43/HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 Motion to allow adjacent property owners to continue using park access ........... S ACCOUNTING I POSITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 REZONING/CAMBRIDGE ESTATES/CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL, INC Motion to approve ordinance amendment to rezone to R-4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT/CAMBRIDGE ESTATES/CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL, INC. . . . . .. 7 Resolution R091-98 approving preliminary plat .............................. 8 PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORTIIP98-9/CAMBRIDGE ESTATES Resolution R092-98 accepting petition/ordering feasibility ...................... 8 DISCUSS SLOW NO-WAKE ORDINANCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8 REVIEW CROOKED LAKE PARKING ORDINANCE Motion to restrict parking permanently . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 APPROVAL OF CLAIMS ................................................. 9 APPROVAL OF MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 ADJOURNMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 --_. --..-- -~..- -.-~..-_... ..~ -.. I ~ C\.,Q ~ 5 -1'1-C¡~ CITY of ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - MAY 5,1998 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jack McKelvey, May 5, 1998, 7:03 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Councilmembers present: Bonnie Dehn, Mike Knight, John Kunza, Ken Orttel Councilmembers absent: None Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins City Engineer, Scott Erickson Finance Director, Jean McGann CommulÚty Development Director, Dave Carlberg City Administrator, Richard Fursman Others RESIDENT FORUM Gary Aus ¡46th Lane - stated the park across the street ITom him has no light, and in the summer it becomes a party hang out for kids. Cars drive over the sliding hìll, eggs have been thrown at his house, trash accumulates in his yard, and the portable out house gets dumped and the waste strewn all over. He's called the police many times, but the offenders are gone before the police get there. He would like to see a light installed at 146th. Also, the parking area is too small, so cars park on the street during games, making it very difficult for him to get out of his driveway or vehicles use his driveway as a turn around. About a month ago a car drove over the sliding hill, got stuck and had to be towed off. The trail was installed to the park. Even though motorized vehicles are not allowed on them, motor bikes and snowmobiles use it all the time where people are walking. Park and Recreation Commissioner Dave O'Toole didn't recall hearing of problems in Prairie Knoll, but snowmobiles are a common problem in all parks. Councilmember Dehn stated people who do damage in the parks need to be held accountable by being tagged and by paying for the damage to the property. Mayor McKelvey stated they will let the Parks Department know about the problem and possibly something can be done to prevent motorized vehicles from going on the trail and on the sliding hill. He will also ask the Sheriffs Department to start patrolling the area regularly. Mr. Erickson stated he will also contact the Park Board about the lighting issue for the park. Winslow Holasek - asked about the policy regarding the addition of items to the Council agenda. Last week several items were added to the Consent Agenda. The paperwork for those items was not available to the public. In reviewing the item since the meeting, he did have several questions. He suggested that Staff list the potential additions to the agenda on the board so residents know before ~ - ,--_.~. . _. ~- ,. - , I Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - May 5, 1998 Page 2 (Resident Forum, Continued) the meeting what other items may be acted upon. The Council stated that they have recently decided that any items that are not housekeeping items would not be added to the agenda for consideration. They agreed with the suggestion to post the potential additions to the agenda prior to the meeting. AGENDA APPROVAL Add Item 6a, Review Crooked Lake Parking Ordinance. Motion by Dehn, Seconded by Knight, to approve the Agenda as amended. Motion carried unalÚmously. CONSENT AGENDA Item 7 Approve Equine Permit (Yard Requirements)/650 146th Lane NW/Gary Aus Item 8 Award BidlIP97-34Narious Park Parking Lots and Field Improvements (See Resolution R083-98) Item 9 Approve Financing of Street Lights/IP97-48/Rosella's Addition Item 10 Fire Department Secretary Replacement Item 11 Award BidlWell #6 Well House Design/IP97-46 (See Resolution R084-98) Item 12 Approve Quote/Test Well/Well #7/IP97-12 (See Resolution R085-98) Item 13 Approve Change OrderslIP96-15/Public Works Expansion (See Resolution R086- 98 for Change Order #6 - Maetens Brenny Construction Co; R087 -98 for Change Order #2 - Crosstown Masonry, Inc.; R088-98 for Change Order #1 - Wasche Commercial FilÚshes; and R089-98 for Change Order #3 - Gorham Oien MechalÚcal) Item 14 Amend 1998 Fee Schedule (See Resolution R090-98) Motion by Kunza, Seconded by Dehn, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unalÚmously. DISCUSS TRAIL ACCESS/lP97-43/HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE Mr. Erickson reviewed the decision of the Park and Recreation Commission to construct a trail from within the Hìlls of Bunker Lake neighborhood to cross Coon Creek to access the Coon Creek Trail along the north side of the creek. This access is proposed to be on park property that is currently being used by the adjacent residents to access their rear yards to park boats and vehicles. The property owner on the east side ofthe park access constructed a tuck-under garage on the back side of the home, and the park access is the only way to access this garage. Both residents would like to continue using the park property for access, which they claim they received permission ITom the City -.... ~ -..- _. ~_ _._~..__~.._ ._... _0' I Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes-May 5, 1998 Page 3 (Trail Access/IP97-43/Hills of Bunker Lake, Continued) to do so. Apparently it was not realized this access area was dedicated park. The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending the owner find a different route to access their back yards, as they do not want to allow motorized vehicles on the paved pedestrian trail. The options are to restrict the access for the property owners or to allow them to continue using it providing they sign a hold harmless agreement. Mr. Erickson showed a video of the proposed location for the trail, plus a second alternative location for the trail farther west which is more wooded. The quotes have indicated that either route would cost about the same. Councilmember Orttel questioned the procedure that was used to determine the location of the trail to cross the creek. By looking at the map, he felt it is obvious that the more westerly access is more centrally located and would be the best option. The eastern option is only a half mile ITom the other bridge, then there is none until Hanson Boulevard. Park and Recreation Commissioner Dave O'Toole stated the easterly location is the more centrally located one with regard to the population in the development. Also, that area is more flat and open, and the base is already in place, so it was felt it would be much more cost effective. The westerly location is all marsh and soft land, and the Commission felt it would be much more expensive to use that access. The quotes to construct the trails were done without the benefit of soil borings being taken on the westerly site. Also, the majority of the residents in the Hills of Bunker Lake preferred the easterly route. Now they cannot get to the bridge ITom this development. Mr. Erickson stated it would be very expensive, plus permission would be needed ITom the railroad, to go under the railroad tracks to access the bridge. Also, physically there is not enough room under the bridge on the south side of the creek. Commissioner O'Toole stated the Park Board discussed splitting this trail access to allow the resident on the east to get to the back yard, but they do not want to see vehicles intermixed with pedestrians on the trails. They are trying to protect the people using the trail. Councilmember Orttel noted that everyone who walks down the trail must walk down the street, which is more dangerous. The discussion continued on the advantages and disadvantages of locating the trail on the most eastern access. A resident adjacent to the easterly access stated people stìll use that road and the wide open area. That is not taken away if they are allowed to continue using the trail. Without the ability to use the trail, they are unable to access the back of their lots. Park and Recreation Commission Chairperson Al Grabowski stated the cost difference between the easterly and westerly site that was quoted was about a $1,000. It didn't address the subgrading but was based strictly in the linear foot. The westerly site has a lot of bog and marsh. It would also serve a smaller portion of the people, as the demographics show that most of the people wìll try to get access to the north crossing ITom the eastern area of the neighborhood. The easterly site already has the substructure put in because the access has already been put in to support heavy equipment for . -.- -_...- .~_..-- ~.. ..... -., I Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - May 5, 1998 Page 4 (Trail Access/IP97-43/Hil/s of Bunker Lake, Continued) utility purposes. The biggest concern is mixing vehiclular with pedestrian traffic on the trails. Once on the trails, there is a sense of security that there will be no morotized vehicles. Chairperson Grabowski also understood that the county does not want the City to construct the trail along Bunker Lake Boulevard because they are not ready to do so. Mr. Erickson stated the upgrading of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and Bunker Lake Boulevard this year will incorporate a trail on the north side of Bunker Lake Boulevard. Councilmember Orttel again cautioned that the location of the trail has to be well thought out and logical, not just a financial concern. He was still concerned that the more westerly access appears to be the most logical one. Chairperson Grabowski felt that the cost could be double for the western location. He could foresee, however, that western access also being constructed in the future to connect with the bridge, so the neighborhood would have two accesses to the bridge. Right now they do not have the funds to construct both accesses. Mr. Erickson didn't think the exact location of the bridge was an issue, as the bridge span is about the same through that area. Councilmember Orttel argued there are any number of parks where the road is used by walkers. He felt the usage of the trail by the property owners to access their rear yards would be infrequent, possibly two to three times per week. The safety issue can be easily resolved by signs. The City issued the bulding permit to allow the tuck-under garage that only had access via park property. He didn't think it would be setting a precedent to allow the use of motorized vehicles on this portion of park property because that use was approved by the City prior to the constructionof the trail. Mayor McKelvey agreed this is a unique situation because the City AdmilÚstrator had given permission thinking it was a utility easement only. Also, the property owners have been using the easement for the past six or seven years and have upgraded the park area with the permission of the City. He would prefer that the gate to the trail remain at its present location and allow the property owners to use the trail with their motorized vehicles. He didn't think the number of vehicular trips per week would be very many. One of the affected property owners stated they checked with their insurance agent and were told that their insurance covers their vehicles at all times. From that standpoint, the City is no more liable than on the City streets. They still questioned the location of the trail access. This location is right next to the other bridge which is only separated by the railroad tracks. Logically, the western access is a better location and is lined with trees, so it is a lot more pleasant access. Another individual stated he runs 40 to SO miles each week, and he knows this trail system. They need a trail system that will give them access to Bunker Hills Park. He talked about the difficulty of crossing the railroad tracks ITom the Hills of Bunker Lake neighborhood on Bunker Lake Boulevard because the signal arm is next to the road, so there is no shoulder. It is extremely dangerous, especially when he has to wait for a train. This trail will provide access to the north side of Coon Creek, then under the railroad tracks to the east side of the tracks. While it is still a safety hazard crossing Bunker Lake Boulevard to get to the park, the more serious problem is crossing the railroad tracks. At some point it would be a good idea to have a culvert put under Bunhker Lake Boulevard ---r ..-...- .-~..-~ ...-...- .. I Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes-May 5, 1998 Page 5 (Trail Access/IP97-43/Hills of Bunker Lake, Continued) to the Bunker Hills Park just as was done for the Bunker Hills golf course because it is very dangerous crossing that road. Another reason for the trail to cross Coon Creek is that many children in one neighborhood want to visit fiiends in the other neighborhood. He also noted that there are no representatives that would be directly affected by locating the trail at the western access because they understood the decision had already been made to construct the eastern trail. If there is going to be a change, those people should be notified and allowed to present their position. A property owner abutting the eastern site presented a map showing the locations of those residents who signed the petition in favor of the trail system. Most are from the southeastern portion of the neighborhood. He didn't remember anyone asking him to sign it. Attorney Hawkins stated the adjacent property owners of the eastern site have been given the right to use the park land for the last seven years. At this point, the City doesn't have any choice. If the right to use the land is taken away, the property owners will have to be paid compensation for that loss. Under the circumstances, it is better for the City and the land owners to formalize this arrangement that sets out their rights and provides a hold harmless agreement. Councilmember Dehn agreed with the safety concerns with crossing the railroad tracks and Bunker Lake Bouelvard to access the Bunker Hills park. She would support the Attorney's recommendation with the understanding that there would be few motorized vehicles using the trail and that reasonable care is taken, especially if vehicles are backed up. The backing up of vehicles is her greatest concern. She felt that soil borings need to be taken before a decision is made on which access should be improved. Mr. Erickson noted that the plans and specifications have been done for the easterly trail access and they are ready to advertise for bids. If the Council wishes to explore the western access option, soil borings would have to be taken Motion by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, that we allow both parties to continue using this access as an access to their rear yards as has been the case for quite some time, subject to an agreement to be worked out with the City Attorney, including a hold harmless clause. DISCUSSION: Councilmember Dehn was in agreement if the trail is used by the parties infrequently. Chairperson Grabowski was concerned that this will set a precedent. Councilmember Knight noted they have been allowed this access for seven years, and this is the advise of the City Attorney. One of the parties stated the trail is used by kids with motor cycles now. With all of the money being spent on trails, he felt it isn't necessary to provide an access to Bunker Hills park when people can just as easily get there with their cars. He also felt that there will be increased crime because of the trails. Mayor McKelvey noted the demand for trails to access parks, the schools, for recreation, etc. The City is discussing the addition of a park patrol. Other cities indicate there is no increase in crime because of the trail systems. Councilmember Knight called the question. Motion carried unanimously. - -- "'-f .__.._ _._~"__.,,... - _0' I Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - May 5, 1998 Page 6 (Trail Access/IP97-43/Hills of Bunker Lake, Continued) VOTE ON MOTION: Carried on a 4- Yes, I-No (Dehn) vote. One of the parties affected realized the property he uses to access his rear yard is City park; but at the time he purchased his land, the survey showed it as a utility easement. If there is a concern with someone getting run over, he noted there is another option; and that is to use the westerly access. He also noted that kids use that bike path past his house now; and no one has gotten run over in seven years; but now it is a big concern. Councilmember Orttel felt the siting process is a big factor and should be based on what is best for the overall City, not necessarily what the residents want or on cost. It has to be a well throught out process. Paul Aastad, west side of the access, stated they asked the Council to view the site because they felt left out of the process. The petition just asked for a trail system and did not specifically request the eastern access site. He felt the location should be made on what is best. If it is the easternly access, they wìll accept the decision as long as there is a good reason. The other access has trees there. After further discussion, the Council generally agreed that before proceeding with the trail, soil borings should be taken on the western access. Mr. Erickson stated they will have soil borings taken and wìl1 report back with the results at the next Council meeting. ACCOUNTING I POSITION Ms. McGann reviewed the application process for the Accounting I position, but Staff is recommending not hiring any of the applicants because they have little to no experience in governmental accounting and the test scores were very low. She noted the options and asked for direction ITom the Council. In addition, the Treasurer is going on leave on May IS and return July 1, which leaves two positions empty in the Finance Department. She has contacted three different CPA firms that deal with government accounting for temporary help. Having someone come in two days a week to help out for four to six weeks would cost $40 to $SO per hour. In discussing the situation, the Council preferred first to offer additional responsibilities and over time to current employees if they want it. The preference then was to advertise through several universities for recent college graduates and consider upgrading the position to an Accounting II position in a few years. REZONING/CAMBRIDGE ESTATES/CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL, INC Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Kunza, the ordinance amendment as preapred, changing the zOlÚng ·ofthe property known as Cambridge Estates to R-4. Motion carried unanimously. - ---r -...- '-_.'-- ~~~. - -" I Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - May 5, 1998 Page 7 PRELIMINARY PLAT/CAMBRIDGE ESTATES/CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL, INC Mr. Carlberg reviewed the preliminary plat for Cambridge Estates which consists of 77 single family residential lots. The City Council has authorized the southern 25 acres to be developed in 1998; however, that development is contingent upon the construction of Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition to the south. He then reviewed the eight variances and proposals made by the PlanlÚng and Zoning Commission as outlined in the agenda material. In reviewing those variances, the Council made the following comments and suggestions: 1) Variancesfor the 100100t buidability requirements: - The majority preferred that Lot 2, Block 7 should be combined with the adjacent lots, as it does not meet the intent of the ordinance. 2) Variance to minimum depth requirement for Lot 7, Block 3 - The Council agreed. 3) Variances for out/ots A and B - The Council discussed either leaving Outlot A as proposed or extending the lot lines to eliminate the outlot. They suggested this issue needs to be discussed and resolved with the Coon Creek Watershed Board, as there is a conflict between their policy and the City's. Because of the size of Outlot A., the Council agreed to allow that outlot to remain and the ownership to be retained by the developer. They asked that the proposed Outlot B be combined with the adjacent lots. 4) Variance for block length for Block 3: The Council did not feel a pedestrain way, which was recommended by the PlanlÚng Commission, is needed because the trail would not lead to any other trail. There was considerable discussion on the issue of trails. Mr. Carlberg noted a trail will be constructed along Hanson Boulevard up to the wetland. No trails are recommended within the plat. Councilmember Dehn felt that some east-west trail should be provided in this area to bring the pedestrian traffic ITom the neighborhoods to the Hanson Bouelvard and Crosstown Boulevard trails, the schools, and convelÚence centers. Staff noted that no provision has been made in the other plats for an east-west trail; and that at this point, it is late in the development process to require it. The Council talked about a means of providing a pedestrian access ITom the northern area to the southern area which is separated by the ditch and wetland. It was noted that there is a bridge across the ditch further east in the proposed Chesterton Commons plat. Pete Raatikka, engineer for the project, noted the Watershed Board has asked that that logging trail over the ditch be removed. They will be installing a culvert temporarily during construction. The Council asked the Staff to discuss with the Watershed Board the desire for a pedestrian crossing over the ditch and to ask them to consider keeping that culvert or allowing a new one to be installed. Mr. Erickson stated they will pursue the issue. 5) Variance for Special Use Permit for the area identificaiton sign - The Council agreed as recommended by the PlanlÚng Commission. ---..- --..- -.._..-- .,,-.... -,. I Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - May 5, 1998 Page 8 (preliminary Plat/Cambridge Estates, Continued) 6) Variance from the constructon of temporary cul-de-sacs - The Council agreed as proposed. 7) Variance for length of cul-de-sac on Eagle Street NW - Council agreed as proposed. 8) Variance for double frontage lots - The Council agreed with the PlanlÚng and ZOlÚng Commission recommendation to eliminate the odd shaped lot of Lot 8, Block 2 and to grant variances for the double frontage lots on Lots 9-12, Block 2. Councilmember Knight was concerned that every foot of high ground is being used and that everything is jammed into this development. He feared that in 20 years as the houses age, they wìll not be very pleasing. He understood the profit motive but feels the Council also has to be concerned with the aesthetic aspect of the City. Winslow Holasek - had the same concerns has Councilmember KIDght. He suggested if there is a concern with density, that consideration be given to changing the ordinance requirements. They put in 90- and 95-foot wide lots in Wmslow Hill, but the developers cannot be blamed for developing 80- foot wide lots when that is what they are allowed to do. Other Councilmembers noted the ordinance allows those lot sizes and that the Metropolitan Council is encouraging even smaller lots and more dense developments. Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, the Resolution approving the preliminary plat of Cambridge Estates as presented with the elìmìnation ofItem No.3 (having to do with the 10-foot pedestrian way for Block 3). (See Resolution R091-98) Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-No (KIÚght) vote. ACCEPT PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT/IP98-9/CAMBRIDGE ESTATES Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility report, noting that this development cannot go forth unless Chesterton Commons 2nd is developed, as the City wì1l not leap ITog to bring utilities to the plat. (See Resolution R092-98) Motion carried unalÚmously. DISCUSS SLOW NO-WAKE ORDINANCE Mr. Fursman explained the City Council of Ramsey supports the concept of establishing the five erosion sensitive areas along the Rum River that were identified by Staff last summer with the exception of Zone #5. They would like to see that zone extended south to the Anoka border. The Council recalled they had recommended that Zones 3 and 4 be connected. They also supported the recommendation by Ramsey to extended Zone 5 south to the Anoka border. --. __.._ ."~..__ ._, __. _0· I Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - May 5, 1998 Page 9 (Slow No-Wake Ordinance, Continued) Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, to go down to the Anoka City limits with Zone 5 if Ramsey agrees to connect Zones 3 and 4. DISCUSSION: Mr. Fursman stated they will bring that recommendation back to the City of Ramsey. Staff will also hold an informational meeting with the residents regarding the proposal. If they are in favor of the proposal, it may not be necessary to hold a public hearing. Motion carried unalÚmously. REVIEW CROOKED LAKE PARKING ORDINANCE Motion by Orttel, Seconded by KlÚght, that the Council renew the parking restrictions around the sensitive area of Crooked Lake and that we make it a permanent ordinance. Motion carried unalÚmously. APPRO V AL OF CLAIMS Motion by Kunza, Seconded by KlÚght, to so move. Motion carried unalÚmously. APPRO V AL OF MINUTES April 21, 1998, Regular Meeting: Correct as written. Motion by KlÚght, Seconded by Dehn, approval of the Minutes. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 1- Present (Kunza) vote. Motion by Knight, Seconded by Kunza, to adjourn. Motion carried unalÚmously. The meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Respectfully submitt~d ~~~ Recording Secretary ~- - - ..--- --> ~.~-~.-- ._~ .--