HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC April 21, 1998
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
Regular City Council Meeting - Tuesday, April 21, 1998 agenda
Call to Order - 7:00 PM Bookmark
Resident Forum Name
Agenda Approval
Consent Agenda
Approval of Minutes minutes
Arbor Day Proclamation
Discussion Items
1. Audit Presentation audit
2. Discuss Feasibility Report for Storm Water, Continued/97-26A1Hamilton Square dis9726a
3. Metes & Bounds Split, Continues/Ashford Dev. Corp. metes
4. Approve Feasibility Report/97-49/Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition appr9749
5. Residential Development Update resupdate
6. Discuss Garbage Hauler Ordinance garbage
7. File Clerk/Receptionist clerk
Staff. Committees. Commissions
8. Set Meeting Date to Discuss Lift Stations lift
9. League of Minnesota Cities Conference league
10. Approve Agenda Concept/Park and Recreation Commission parkrec
Non-Discussion/cousent Items
II. Approve Bids for Mowing Services mowing
12. Declare Costs/Order Assessment Roll, Continued/97-26/Hamilton Square dclr9726
13. Adopt Assessment RoIl/Waive Hearing, Continuedl97-26/Hamilton Square adpt9726
14. Approve Tree Trimmer Licenses tree
IS. Award Bid/97-44/Shadowbrook 3rd Add. bid9744
16. Reduce EscrowslFeasibility Report/97-44/Shadowbrook 3rd Add. feas9744
17. Reduce Letter ofCredit/97-44/Plans & Specs/Shadowbrook 3rd Add. loc9744
18. Reduce Plat Escrows/Hills of Bunker Lake 2nd Add. bunkerl
19. Reduce Escrows/Developer Improvements/Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd Add. buuker3
20. Reduce Escrow/Developer Improvements/Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Add. bunkerS
21. Reduce Letter of CreditlDeveloper Improvements/Shadowbrook 2nd Add. locshad2
22. Approve Contract/Sunshine Park Concessions concessi
23. Approve Quotes/94-30/Andover City Hall Extension Lighting of Old Building qt9430
24. Approve Change Order #3/94-33B/Commercial Blvd NW Contaminated Soil & co39433b
Debris Removal
25. Release Letter ofCredit/92-19/Weybridge 3rd Addition loc9219
26. Release Letter of Credit/Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Add. lochillsS
27.· Approve Plans & Specs/97-43Narious Trails Improvements ps9743
28. Authorize Obtaining Quotes for Drilling 2 Test Wells for Municipal Well #7 well7
29. Approve Change Order # 10/96-1 5/Public Works Expansion/Julian Johnson co961S
Mayor/Council Input
Payment of Claims
Adjournment
0. _ __._.._... . _. ~-
REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - APRIL 21, 1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS·
RESIDENT FORUM ..................................................... 1
AGENDA APPROVAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
CONSENT AGENDA
Approve bids for mowing services ........................................ 2
Approve tree trimmer licenses ............................................ 2
Resolution R071-98 awarding bid!IP97-44/Shadowbrook 3rd ................... 2
Reduce escrowslFeasibility report/IP97-44/Shadowbrook 3rd ................... 2
Reduce Letter ofCredit/IP97-44/Plans & specs/Shadowbrook 3rd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
Reduce plat escrowslHills of Bunker Lake 2nd Addition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
Reduce escrows/Developer improvements/Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
Reduce escrows/Developer improvementslHills of Bunker Lake 5th. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Reduce Letter of Credit/Developer improvements/Shadowbrook 2nd . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
Approve contract/Sunshine Park concessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
Resolution R072-98 approving quotes!IP94-3/Andover City Hall Lighting of
old building .................................................... 2
Resolution R073-98 approving change order #3!IP94-33B/Commercial
Boulevard Contaminated soil and debris removal ........................ 2
Release Letter ofCredit!IP92-19/Weybridge 3rd ............................. 2
Release Letter of Credit /Hills of Bunker Lake 5th. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
Resolution R074-98 approving plans and specs!IP97-43Narious trails improvements.. 2
Authorize obtailÚng quotes for drilling two test wells for mUlÚcipal well #7 ......... 2
Resolution R075-98 approving change order #10/IP96-15/Public Works
Expansion/Julian Johnson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
APPROVAL OF MINUTES ................................................ 2
ARBOR DAY PROCLAMATION ........................................... 3
AUDIT PRESENTATION
Motion to accept the 1997 audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UPDATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
DECLARE COSTS/ORDER ASSESSMENT ROLL/ADOPT ASSESSMENT ROLL/
WAIVE HEARING!lP97-26/HAMILTON SQUARE.........................· 4
Resolution R076-98 declaring costs and ordering assessment roll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5
Resolution ROn -98 adopting the assessment roll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5
DISCUSS FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR STORM W ATER/IP97-26N
HAMILTON SQUARE................................................ 5
Resolution R078-98 to accept feasibility without acting on it .................... 7
METES AND BOUNDS SPLIT/ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .·8
Motion to require easements as a part of the lot split (Motion withdrawn) .......... 9
Motion to table (Motion withdrawn) ...................................... 9
Motion determilÚng need for easement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9
FEASIBILITY REPORT!lP97-49/CHESTERTON COMMONS 2ND ................ 9
Resolution R079-98 approving feasibility and ordering plans and specs. . . . . . . . . . . . 10
DISCUSS GARBAGE HAULER ORDINANCE .........;..................... 10
FILE CLERKlRECEPTIONIST
Motion to grant temporary full-time position to Ms. Olson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
MEETING DATE TO DISCUSS LIFT STATIONS/EDA ISSUES (April 30) ......... 10
~..,---.. _.~- ...-.. -.. ~. ..
Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - April 21, 1998
Table of Contents
Pageii
QUOTES/IP94-33H/COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD SITE
Resolution R080-98 authorizing $5,600 to clean up Wilber and Mistelske site ...... 10
DECLARE COSTS/ORDER ASSESSMENT ROLLI ADOPT ASSESSMENT ROLLI
WAIVE HEARING/IP97-8/CHESTERTON COMMONS
Motion to amend assessment policy to comply with attorney's legal opilÚon . . . . . . . . 11
Resolution R081-98 declaring costs and ordering assessment roll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Resolution R082-98 adopting assessment roll and waiving public hearing . . . . . . . . . . 11
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
AGENDA CONCEPT/PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Motion to approve amendment to Ordinance 229A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
MA YORlCOUNCIL INPUT
Schedule meeting with CouncilsfAnoka and Ramsey (tentatively set for May 13) .... 12
PAY1ÆENTOFCLAIMS ................................................. 12
ADJOURNMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
- -. -., - .. .. ..
·v~\.,ç OJ ú5,~U'
5 ~5 J:ì'l
CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - APRIL 21, 1998
MINUTES
The Regular Bi-MontWy Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jack
McKelvey, April 21, 1998,7:15 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW,
Andover, Minnesota.
Councilmembers present: BonlÚe Dehn, Mike KlÚght, Ken Orttel
Councilmember absent: John Kunza
Also present: City Attorney, Wìl1iam G. Hawkins
City Engineer, Scott Erickson
Finance Director, Jean McGann
Community Development Director, Dave Carlberg
City AdmilÚstrator, Richard Fursman
Others
RESIDENT FORUM
Jerry Windschitl Ashford Development - asked that Items 12 and 13 be moved from the Consent
Agenda for discussion. He wanted to discuss the mobilizations costs for his project. The Council
agreed.
Winslow Holasek - was unaware of the EDA meeting and asked where that was held. The Council
explained it was held in the conference room and was open to the public.
AGENDA APPROVAL
Move Item 5, Residential Development Update to be discussed after Item I. Remove from the
Consent Agenda for discussion, Item 12, Declare Costs/Order Assessment RoI1lIP97-26/HamiIton
Square, and Item 13, Adopt Assessment RollIWaive Hearing!IP97-26/HarlÚlton Square. It was
agreed the issue of mobìlìzation costs will be discussed in conjunction with Items 12 and 13. Add
Item 7a, Approve Quote/IP94-33HJCommercial Boulevard Site; Item 7b, Declare Costs/Order ,.
Assessment RolIJIP97-8/Chesterton Commons, and Item 7c, Adopt Assessment RollIWaive
Hearing!IP97 -98/Chesterton Commons.
Motion by KlÚght, Seconded by Dehn, to approve the Agenda as amended. Motion carried 01} a 4-
Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote.
- -0. _ "_'_..__. ..._- ..-
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - April 21, 1998
Page 2
CONSENT AGENDA
Item 11 Approve Bids for Mowing Services (to B & W Property Maintenance for
weed abatement @ $25/hour; to KoelÚng Brothers Landscaping for City
owned properties at $6,990, and to Isaacson Lawn Care for Commercial Park
properties at $950)
Item 14 Approve Tree Trimmer Licenses (Dehn Tree Company, Miller Tree Service,
and Sean Strong)
Item 15 Award Bid!IP97-44/Shadowbrook 3rd (See Resolution R071-98)
Item 16 Reduce Escrows/Feasibility ReportlIP97-44/Shadowbrook 3rd Addition
Item 17 Reduce Letter ofCredit/IP97-44/Plans & Specs/Shadowbrook 3rd Addition
Item 18 Reduce Plat Escrows/Hìlls of Bunker Lake 2nd Addition
Item 19 Reduce Escrows/Deve1oper Improvements!Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd Addition
Item 20 Reduce Escrow/Developer Improvements/Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition
Item 21 Reduce Letter of CreditlDeveloper Improvements/Shadowbrook 2nd
Addition
Item 22 Approve Contract/Sunshine Park Concessions
Item 23 Approve Quotes/IP94-30/Andover City Hall Extension Lighting o( Old
Building (See Resolution R072-98)
Item 24 Approve Change Order # 3/IP94-33B/Commercial Boulevard NW
ContarIDnated Soil and Debris Removal (See Resolution R073-98)
Item 25 Release Letter ofCreditlIP92-19/Weybridge 3rd Addition
Item 26 Release Letter ofCredit!Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition
Item 27 Approve Plans and Specs!IP97-43Narious Trails Improvements (See
Resolution R074-98)
Item 28 Authorize ObtailÚng Quotes for Drilling Two Test Wells for Municipal Well
#7
Item 29 Approve Change Order # 1 O/IP96-15/Public Works Expansion/Julian Johnson
(See Resolution R075-98)
Motion by KlÚght, Seconded by Dehn, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried on a 4~Y es,
I-Absent (Kunza) vote.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Apri/7, 1998, HRA Meeting: Correct as written.
April 7, 1998, Regular City Council Meeting: Correct as written.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, to approve as written. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent
(Kunza) vote.
- --. --..- -.-_.,-- .-, ·Þ· _.'
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - April 21, 1998
Page 3
ARBOR DAY PROCLAMATION
Mayor McKelvey read the proclamation declaring April 25, 1998, as Arbor Day in the City of
Andover.
AUDIT PRESENTATION
David Hinnencamp of Kern, DeWinter, Viere, Ltd., gave an overview of the City's 1997 operation,
comparing various aspects of the financial status of the City with that of previous years. The fund
balance has increased, both revenues and expenditures have been on the incline due to development
and growth of the City, the majority of the revenues comes from taxes, the largest expenditure is for
public safety, the net tax capacity increased about 10.5 percent from 1996 to 1997, the tax capacity
rates have been consistently low compared to other cities, the rates are covering the operating
expenses in the Water Fund, and the Utility Funds are operating at a loss when considering
depreciation. While the total replacement costs of the sewer system is not being recovered at this
point, he expected there is a lot of unused capacity in the system to pick up that cost. Mr.
Hinnencamp also reviewed the comments made in the management letter such as the changes in
reporting practices beginlÚng in 1998, that the fixed assets will be audited in 1998, and that the City
is in a very good financial position.
The Council discussed the loss in the sewer and water fund. Mr. Hinnencamp did not think it was
a serious issue at this time because of the grow and development occurring in the City. Ms. McGann
also noted there will be increased revenues in the Sewer Fund beginning the end of 1999 when Sewer
Fund A and B areas wìll be combined. Councilmember KlÚght commended Ms. McGann and her
Staff on behalf of the Council for their good work.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, to accept the 1997 Audit. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, 1-
Absent (Kunza) vote.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Mr. Carlberg updated the Council on the development occurring in 1998 through 1999 in the urban
residential area. Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition has been tabled at the request of the developer.
Cambridge Estates has been authorized to develop the southern 25 acres in 1998. The preliminary
plat wìll be received by the City Council on May 5; however, the utilities will be coming from
Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition. If Chesterton Commons 2nd is not developed this year, neither
wìll Cambridge Estates develop this year. Burr Oak Run was received by the Andover Review
Committee on April 3. It too is contingent upon receiving utilities from east of Hanson Boulevard
and is dependent upon the development of Chesterton Commons 2nd this year. It has been
determined that the entire plat may be able to be served from the east with gravity flow. Andover
PUD would also gets its utilities ITom east of Hanson Boulevard and is dependent on the development
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - April 21, 1998
Page 4
(Residential Development Update, Continued)
of Chesterton Commons 2nd. The City Council received a sketch plan for this plat on February 3,
but no preliminary plat has yet been submitted. Shadowbrook 3rd Addition will be developing its
town home development. The City has not received plans for Winslow Hills 4th Addition which was
scheduled for 1998 development; nor has it received plans for property to be developed by Rosella
Sonsteby on Bunker Lake Boulevard and Seventh Avenue.
Mr. Carlberg also reviewed the proposed 1999 development: Rosella Sonsteby's property which
would need to be served with utilities ITom the City of Anoka, Cambridge Estates North, Sophie's
South which is contingent upon the Winslow Hìlls 4th addition unless utilities can be provided.fTom
another direction, and Nightingale Miscellaneous. Those plats need to be coming into the City now
to be on line for development in 1999. Staff will be meeting with the developers in May to discuss
these projects plus the next five-year phase period for the years 2000 to 2005.
DECLARE COSTS/ORDER ASSESSMENT ROLV ADOPT ASSESSMENT ROLVW-1IVE
HEARINGI IP97-26/HAMILTON SQUARE
There was considerable discussion as to the order these items should be handled along with the
feasibility report for storm water for Hamilton Square and the metes and bounds split for Ashford
Development Corporation. The Council first discussed the issue of mobilization costs.
Jerry Windschitl Ashford Development - stated the mobilization costs have nothing to do with the
other items. They are trying to resolve the final assessments for Chesterton Commons. There were
three different contractors for the project -- the City project for trunk sewer and water; Hamilton
Square trunk watermain and Chesterton Commons lot development costs. The bid that was let was
unusual because the contractor ITont loaded the mobilization costs, which amounted to $26,000.
That entire mobilization cost is being assessed to Chesterton Commons. He asked that those costs
be pro-rated between Chesterton Commons, the City and Hamilton Square based on how much'each
contributed to the contract.
Mr. Erickson stated typically the City doesn't pro-rate the mobilization costs. The City normally
won't do that project unless a developer is developing, and the mobilization is part of the project
costs for the developer. This cost is unusually high. If the City does pro-rate this one, it will be
setting a precedent that wìll have a great impact on the City for future projects. Staff's
recommendation is that mobilization costs are part of the project costs and should be paid by the
developer.
Mr Wìndschitl - argued Ashford then gets stuck for the entire bìll when a portion of the mobilization
cost benefited Hamilton Square. He was forced to give easement so the water line could be installed
to provide enough fire flow for Hamilton Square. If the City can't pay for the mobilization cost, he
felt the cost should at least be pro-rated between the two developers.
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes-April21,1998
Page 5
(Assessment Roll/IP97-26/Hamilton Square, Continued)
There was considerable discussion on the course of events and the benefits to both Chesterton
Commons and HarlÚlton Square. Mr. Erickson estimated a pro-rated share of the cost for Hamilton
Square would be about $300. The City's share is considerably more. The City Council did not. wish
to change its policy and generally agreed it would not pay for a portion of the mobilization cost.
Gordon Jensen Attorney for the HarlÚltons - stated they would agree to the additional charge of$300
for mobilization costs, increasing the assessment on each of the three lots by $100. The Council
agreed.
Mr. Erickson explained the assessments for Hamilton Square includes an estimated cost of$14,000
for storm sewer work which mayor may not be enough, depending on the final cost to resolve the
storm sewer issue. He suggested the assessment roll be adopted as shown, with the addition of the
$100 per lot just agreed to by Mr. Jensen. A separate assessment roll could be done if additional
storm sewer costs are incurred.
Mr Jensen - stated they are in agreement with the assessment roll with the increase of $1 00 pèr lot.
Mr Windschitl - questioned the portion of the assessment for work not yet performed. He asked the
legality of an assessment before the work is filÚshed. He was concerned that if the work for the storm
sewer is assessed, the Hamiltons can then argue that because they have been assessed, the City is
required to build something regardless of the cost. He felt this is a maneuver to force the City to
build something and possibly the City would end up picking up the costs for it. Attorney Hawkins
advised the City does have the right to assess estimated costs based on feasibility reports and on
petitions received on projects. There is no legal requirement that a project has to be completed
before it is assessed. The developer is aware this is an estimated cost; and if the final costs exceed
this, there may be another assessment hearing to assess the benefits to this property.
Motion by Dehn, Seconded by KlÚght, the Resolution as presented with the additional $100 per lot
assessment. (See Resolution R076-98 declaring costs and ordering assessment roll) Motion carried
on a 4- Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote.
Motion by The Resolution adopting the assessment roll and waiving the public hearing as presented
and with the addition of $300, $100 per lot. (See Resolution R077-98) Motion carried on a 4- Yes,
I-Absent (Kunza) vote.
DISCUSS FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR STORM WATER/IP97-26A/HAMILTON SQUARE
Mr. Erickson reviewed the options in the feasibility report to provide a storm water outlet for
Hamilton Square through Chesterton Commons and Cambridge Estates along Hanson Bouleyard.
The intent is the storm sewer outlet within HarlÚlton Square would be tied into the drainage system
--. ,-.-., . . . ~. ..
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - April 21, 1998 -
Page 6
(Feasibility Reportfor Storm Water/IP97-26A/Hamilton Square, Continued)
to the north. IlÚtially the thought was the system would be tied to the first pond in Chesterton
Commons at an estimated cost of $14,SOO. Since then, Ashford Development has requested a five-
acre split from that general area. If the intent is to develop that five acres commercially, the pond
would be moved. Then an option would be to pipe the water from the outlet in Hamilton Square in
the county right of way all the way to Ditch 37 which would cost about $79,000. If some ditching
and some piping were done, it would cost about $S9,000. The cost to just pipe north of the proposed
five-acre split area to the next ponding cell would be about $38,000. The unknown at this time is
whether or not the proposed five-acre split area will be developed as commercial.
Jerry Windschitl Ashford Development - stated in the past the policy has been to charge $0.04 per
square foot for all land above the 100-year flood. He stated they have two options regarding the
proposed five-acre area to be split. One is to move the pond to the northeast corner of the site near
the gas line easement. The other is to move the pond on the east side of the property to provide a
buffer between the commercial and residential area. In this case, they wouldn't be mitigating the
wetland area.
JeffShopek Civil Engineer on the Hamilton Square Proiect - provided a history of the project and
the search for a storm water outlet for the site. He was concerned that there has been no amendment
to the Chesterton Commons plat. All of the ponds are dug and in place. They designed their storm
sewer according to that preliminary plat. If Mr. Windschitl wants to amend the preliminary plat,
those costs are not associated with the HarlÚlton Square property. The other issue is the cost of
getting a IS-inch pipe, the milÚmum size allowed, all the way to Ditch 37 for only a minute amount
of water. They are using only 3/4 ofcfs of the pipe. rfthat pipe is constructed, there is room for
additional capacity and should be used and paid for by other areas. Originally the pond was on the
corner and they stubbed to it. With the storm drainage from Hamilton Square, there was no need to
increase the pipe sizes in Chesterton Commons to accommodate the 100-year run off. Then that pond
was eliminated, so they stubbed to the storm sewer. Then the storm sewer was moved back and now
a feasibility study is being done. Beyond this it is really a benefit to the City's whole storm sewer
system. He noted Mr. Windschitl's suggestion that Hamilton Square pay $0.04 per square foot for
storm sewer. They have already put in a pipe to the property line at a cost of$34,000 plus accepted
an assessment for another $14,000. They are asking the City Council to stay with the original
preliminary plat which was approved. If there is to be a change, it should be at no cost to Hamilton
Square.
Mr. Erickson agreed the ponding in Chesterton Commons would not have to be increased to allow
for the water ITom HarlÚlton Square to pass through. He then stated there may be one other option
of combilÚng the storm sewer system where both parties can use it and both parties would save on
development costs. It is a timing issue to get everything in place and this would be on the assumption
that the proposed five-acre area would be split and be developed as commercial. He would like to
explore that option with both Mr. Windschitl and the Hamiltons. The entire storm drainage ponding
system is in place within Chesterton Commons to Ditch 37 with the exception of a connection
between two ponds and a pipe across the gas line easement.
~. ..
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - April 21, 1998
Page 7
(Feasibility Reportfor Storm Water/IP97-26A/Hamilton Square, Continued)
Gordon Jensen Attorney for the Hamiltons - presented a letter prepared by the Hamiltons to the City
Council outlilÚng the sequence of events. He noted over a year ago the Hamiltons provided easement
for Mr. Windschitl to run sewer and water to his plat of Chesterton Commons. The discussion at that
time was that utilities should not be cut off for future development. Since that time, they have been
trying to hit a moving target in regard to an overflow for the storm water for Hamilton Square. Every
time they hooked in at one point, it moved to another. They have already installed over $30,ÛO in
storm water piping at the suggestion of the City to meet the first option. They are asking that this
stop and that they be allowed to hook up to the pond, recognizing the preliminary plat is still in place.
Ifthe pond does move as a result of the design change in the preliminary plat, those expenses should
belong to the plat, not to Hamilton Square. They cannot endorse any of the three options listed in
the feasibility study. They are suggesting the option ilÚtially proposed and for which they have
already paid and installed an east-west pipe be the basis for what they should have to pay to ha"e the
water discharged from Hamilton Square in the 1 OO-year event.
Winslow Holasek - pointed out the problem has occurred because this area should be draining south,
but TKDA removed the Hanson Boulevard storm sewer system and ponding. It is more expensive
to go north.
A very lengthy discussion continued that the amount already paid for by HarlÚlton Square exceeds
$0.04 per square foot, that the development ofHarlÚlton Square did do what the City told them, that
both the City and Hamilton Square were relying on a preliminary plat which has no official
significance, that a commercial lot in Chesterton Commons would require additional storm drainage
capacity, and that it should not necessarily be assumed that the proposed five-acre split area will be
commercial.
Mr. Erickson again noted the need for additional ponding ifthere is a commercial area in Chesterton
Commons and the relocation of the ponding may mean that some piping up Hanson Boulevard could
be done to benefit both parties. At the present time, if the five acres is split by metes and bounds, the
storm drainage easements must be dedicated to the City. The City could vacate any easements that
are not needed if the lot does develop as commercial in the future. The entire ponding area ITom
Ditch 37 down to Chesterton Commons is meant to work together, and the entire ponding system
needs to be operational before anybody can tie into it.
The Council then agreed with Mr. Erickson's suggestion to meet with the developers of both
Hamilton Square and Chesterton Commons in an attempt to arrive at a solution to the storm drainage
issue discussed this evelÚng.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, to accept the feasibility study without calling the public hearing
or acting on it. (See Resolution R078-98) Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote.
- .., . ~ -
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes -April 21, 1998
Page 8
METES AND BOUNDS SPLIT/ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Mr. Erickson again noted the easements for storm drainage based on the preliminary plat need to be
dedicated
Jeny Windschitl Ashford Development - stated if the storm drainage area is to be dedicated to the
City, it means about one acre of that five-acre piece wìl1 be for someone else's use. That first pond
will not exist if the property is developed commercially. Ifit is developed for commercial, they would
have to redesign the storm drainage system to meet the Watershed and City approvals. The best
option may be to place the pond between the commercial and residential areas. He also pointed out
the documentation ITom his engineer indicates there wiIl be over 1 million gallons of water from the
HarlÚlton property in the 100-year storm. It is a very large quantity of water. He is not holding up
development in Hamilton Square, as they have the option of going south or ponding on site. He
accused the Harniltons of wanting to use his land before he does. If the City takes the easement and
dumps the water ITom Hamilton Square on it, he will have no chance to use it or get it back because
the Hamiltons wiIl argue the City is taking away their capacity. Mr. Erickson re-emphasized that
the entire area, Hamilton Square, Chesterton Commons and Cambridge Estates north to Ditch 37
functions as one system. All easements have to be dedicated before any storm water will work.
Winslow Holasek - stated the Hamiltons have spent a lot of money on storm drainage already. He
was willing to give up part of the capacity and put in extra ponding to the south to accommodate
Hamilton Square, but that would be costly. He also questioned the ability to develop a commercial
area under the power lines. Also the ponding is between the poles on Hanson boulevard, and there
isn't much room. The Council noted any change would have to be reviewed and easements
dedicated. Those easements taken now that may not be needed in the future would then be vacated.
Mr WindschitI - argued there is no need for the pond on the proposed five-acre site to develop
Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition. Also, there are certain things they cannot do under the p'ower
lines, but they can build parking lots. That area shown as ponding is very valuable as commercial
land. Mr. Erickson disagreed with the statement on ponding, as the entire system is designed to
function as one pond. All of the ponds are graded, but there are two connections stìl1 needed under
the gas line and under the future 155th Lane.
Discussion also noted that any change to the preliminary plat would require a public hearing and
changes to the grading and drainage would require Watershed and City approval. There is
Watershed and City approval for the storm drainage system along Hanson Boulevard as proposed.
Jeff EIliott - stated he has looked at the storm sewer system going to the pond for Chesterton
Commons 2nd Addition, but he hasn't looked at the total capacity of the pond in terms ofthe entire
system. The elevations of the pond and piping in Chesterton Commons 2nd will work for that
development as proposed. Mr. Erickson stated Mr. EIliott reviewed the hydraulic capacity of the
pipes within Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition. He hasn't looked into the entire ponding area. The
Council continued to discuss what should be done.
--.. . -. ----. ~- -.-~.,- - .. . ~.
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - April 21, 1998
Page 9
(Metes and Bounds Split/Ashford Development, Continued)
Motion by KIDght, Seconded by Orttel, to require the easements be accepted as a part of the lot split.
DISCUSSION: Mayor McKelvey didn't think he could support the taking of the easement as sJ;¡own
on the preliminary plat ifit is going to be changed to a commercial area on this corner. He felt the two
parties should agree with some means to pipe the storm water. Mr. Erickson again asked for an
OppOrtulÚty to meet with the developers' ~ngineers and the Watershed engineer to look at this from
an engineering perspective. Councilmember Dehn agreed and suggested they consider both a
commercial and a residential development option.
Councilmembers Orttel and KIDght WITHDREW the Second and the Motion.
Motion by Dehn, Seconded by McKelvey, to table this and have Mr. Erickson work with the
developers' engineers. DISCUSSION: Mr: Carlberg noted the metes and bounds subdivision is done
administratively. The ordinance allows the Council to require easements to be dedicated. The
Council then suggested the item be forwarded to the admilÚstration and that the easements to be
taken be determined by the City Engineer.
Mayor McKelvey and Councilmember Dehn WITHDREW the Second and the Motion.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, that the City Council determines the need for the easement but
is giving the City Engineer the authority to determine the extent of the boundary of the easement. City
Council authorizes Staff to admilÚstratively approve the Lot Split subject to the approval of the City
Engineer for solving the drainage issue in the area by acquiring the proper easements on that property
as he deems necessary. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote.
APPROVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/IP97-49/CHESTERTON COMMONS 2ND ADDITION
Mr. Erickson explained the Council has approved a motion that allowed for the preparation of a
feasibility study for Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition but not to proceed any further until the storm
drainage issue can be resolved. He stated the developer is wìlling to bond for the costs of the
preparation of the plans and specifications. He did not see a problem with preparing the plans and
specs but then not ordering the improvement or holding the public hearing on the project until the
drainage issue is resolved.
Jerry Windschitl Ashford Development - did not have a problem with posting a bond for the
preparation of the plans and specifications. He suggested the Council consider whether the City is
better or worse off resolving the Hamilton Square drainage issue or having the plat filed for
Chesterton Commons. If the plat is not filed, there is no hope of getting the storm drainage to Ditch
37. They own the easements to get the drainage to Ditch 37.
---- ~ .-.. _..._ .h"_.._o .. .~. ..
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes-April21,1998
Page 10
(Feasibility Report/IP97-49/Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition, Continued)
After Council discussion, it was agreed to accept the feasibility study and order the plans and
specifications but not order the project at this time until the easement issues are resolved.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by KlÚght, to approve the Resolution; delete "Ordering Improvement"
ITom the title of the Resolution. (See Resolution R079-98) Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent
(Kunza) vote.
DISCUSS GARBAGE HAULER ORDINANCE
Mr. Fursman explained the City has limited the number oflicensed haulers to ten and the number of
commercial haulers to seven. Several of the larger haulers have been purchasing the smaller
companies. The question is whether those larger haulers will be able to retain the same number of
licenses as before the purchase, whether the haulers will only be allowed to hold one license, and
whether the total number oflicenses should be reduced as the smaller haulers are bought up.
The Council discussed the issue of keeping the cost down for the consumers if monopolies are
created, the concerns of some residents over the number of haulers coming down one street in the
course of a week, and a suggestion to zone the City into quarters to collect garbage only on certain
days in each area. It was finally determined that at this time there isn't a problem and to leave the
ordinance as is.
FILE CLERK/RECEPTIONIST
Motion by Dehn, Seconded by KIDght, that we grant this temporary full-time position for Ms. Tara
Olson. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote.
MEETING DATE TO DISCUSS LIFT STATIONSÆDA ISSUES
The Council agreed to hold a special meeting to discuss lift stations following the Board of Review
on Thursday, April 30, 1998. Following that discussion, an EDA meeting will be held to discuss
issues relating to the Commercial Park development.
APPROVE QUOTES//P94-33H/COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD SITE
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, that $5,600 be authorized to clean up the Wilber and Mistelske
site, Herbst and Sons Construction Company as recommended by City Staff. (See Resolution R080-
98) Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - April 21, 1998
Page 11
DECLARE COSTS/ORDER ASSESSMENT ROLVADOPT ASSESSMENT ROLLlWÀIVE
HEARING/IP97-8/CHESTERTON COMMONS
Mr. Erickson stated the issue of mobilization costs were determined by the Council earlier this
evelÚng. The assessment roll wìll be reduced by $300, the amount of the mobilization costs allocated
to HarlÚlton Square. The other issue is the application of construction interest. The City Attorney
provided an opinion in 1991 on how construction interest is applied. The City's policy is in conflict
with that opilÚon. Staff is recommending the policy be changed as advised by the Attorney's opinion.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that the Council amend the City's assessment policy to
comply with the legal opilÚon ITom the City Attorney's letter of April 11 , 1991, relating to the interest
on pre-paid assessments. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote
.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, approving the Resolution to be prepared by Staff declaring
costs and ordering the assessment roll for IP97-8, Chesterton Commons, in the amount of$ll, 117.45
per lot minus the $300 on the gross project. (See Resolution R081-98) Motion carried on a 4-Yes,
I-Absent (Kunza) vote
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, that the Council direct Staff to prepare a Resolution to adopt
the assessment roll and that we approve such assessment roll and accept the letter waiving the public
hearing on Project 97-8, Chesterton Commons. (See Resolution R082-98) Motion carried on a 4-
Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE
Mr. Fursman noted the preliminary program schedule for the 1998 League of Minnesota Cities
Conference. He suggested if anyone is going to attend that they let him know.
APPROVE AGENDA CONCEPT/PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Mr. Fursman noted Mr. Haas, Parks Coordinator, had attended a meeting of the Park and Recreation
Commission in Blaine and noted a preamble to the agenda that was read so the general public
watching cable tv and those in attendance are aware of the Commission's responsibility. Staff is
looking at a similar format for the Council agenda. The Council generally approved of the language.
Mr. Fursman stated another issue that has been raised is the paragraph on Duties of the Park and
Recreation Commission in Ordinance 229, Section 1, Part G. As written, it appears that the
Commission is directly responsible for the maintenance, improvements and upkeep of the parks. In
reality, the Commission plays an advisory role and those items are an administrative function of the
City. He noted the proposed change in the language of that paragraph.
-- -. -_.~- ,.~-,_. . ... o.
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - April 21, 1998
Page 12
(Approve Agenda Concept/Park and Recreation Commission, Continued)
Al Grabowski, Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission, stated the Commission does not
want to be in a supervisory or admilÚstrative role but is there to make recommendations. They do,
however, get directly involved when residents petition to upgrade parks and forward
recommendations to the City Council. As written, the new language may prevent that.
The Council proposed a correction to the language that still gives the Commission the ability to
advise on maintenance and park improvements, etc.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by KlÚght, the amendment to Ordinance 229A as presented with the
change, insert "on all matters" between "Council" and "concerning" to read: The Commission shall
research and advise the City Council on all matters concerlÚng parks and recreation programs.
Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote
MA YOR/COUNCIL INPUT
Schedule meeting with Councils/ Anoka and Ramsey - The Council agreed to set a tentative date to
meet with the Councils of the Cities of Anoka and Ramsey on Wednesday, May 13. Mr. Fun,man
stated the School District would also like to attend and would be willing to provide dinner for the
Councils that evening.
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Motion by KlÚght, Seconded by Dehn, to approve the Claims. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent
(Kunza) vote
Motion by KlÚght, Seconded by Dehn, to adjourn. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent (Kunza)
vote.
The meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~L
Mar lla A. Peach
Recording Secretary