Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC February 20, 1996 A pçr-oved 0..5 CoY"r-ec~d .3/lP qlo CITY of ANDOVER Regular City Council Meeting - February 20, 1996 a to Order - 7:00 pm Resident Forum Agenda Approval Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes Proclamation/Volunteers of America Week Discussion Items 1. Coon Creek Walkway/Bikeway/Trail Discussion/95-24, Cont. 2. Discuss Modified Cul-de-sac Layouts HRA Meeting 3. Public Hearing/1996-1997 CDBG Projects EDA Meeting 4. Award Bid/Building Removal at Best Auto Parts Re¡::>orts of Staff, Committees. Commissions 5. Walkway/Bikeway/Trail Discussion, Cont. 6. Discussion/Contract for Mowing Services Interview Construction Management Firms " - Non-Discussion/Consent Items 7. Approve Easement Encroachment Agreement/15073 Zilla Street 8. Approve Revised Final Plat/Nightingale Ridge r~ 9. Declare Costs/Order Assessment Roll/95-25/1529 -l48th Lane N.W. 10. Adopt Assessment Roll/95-25/1529 -148th Lane N.W. 11. Approve Resolution Identifying Deferred Assessments/95-14 ~ 12. Variance/139xx Round Lake Boulevard 13. Authorization to Purchase Utility Van/Water Department 14. Declare Costs/Order Hearing/94-10/Jonathan Woods 15. Waive Hearing/ Adopt Assessment Roll/94-10IJonathan Woods 16. Declare Costs/Order Assessment Roll/93-31/WoodIand Creek 4th 17. Waive Hearing/ Adopt Assessment Roll/93-31/WoodIand Creek 4th 18. Declare Costs/Order Assessment Roll/95-1/WoodIand Creek 5th 19. Waive Hearing/ Adopt Assessment Roll/95-1/WoodIand Creek 5th 20. Amend Ordinance 98/ Lawful Gambling 21. Approve Change Order #8 (Compensating) Hi1Is of Bunker 5th/93-12 22. Final Payment/Hills of Bunker Lake 5th/93-12 23. Approve Quotes/93-7/Roll Up Kitchen Doors/City Hall Park Complex #2 24. Approve Purchase of File Storage Equipment Mayor-Council Input PavrnentofC1abns Adjournment F\-ppro\!ed CA-S LoY'rec..t-eJ :BIle l'llo CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - FEBRUARY 20, 1996 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jack McKelvey on February 20, 1996, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Councilmembers present: Dehn, Jacobson, Knight Councilmember absent: Kunza Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins City Engineer, Scott Erickson City Finance Director, Jean McGann City Planning Director, Dave Carlberg City Administrator, Richard Fursman Others RESIDENT FORUM Bob Lund. owner of Lund's Towing - stated they went to court on February 7, and he can no longer tow in the City of Andover or respond to calls for towing related services from his premises or any other location in the City. He asked for a clarification. Attorney Hawkins suggested he talk with his own attorney about the terms he agreed to. Mr. Lund - stated the City spent $40,000 to keep him out of the City. He felt he has a right to a business and that the City is keeping him from doing it. He felt his constitutional right is being violated. He felt he didn't have a choice but to agree to the terms in court. He asked what ordinance states he cannot respond to a towing call from his house. He doesn't run his business from his house; it is located in the City of St. Francis. Does he now have to drive out of the City into Coon Rapids, then come back into the City to respond to a towing call? He drives his personal vehicle, but feels he is being watched all the time. The only time he brought a second tow truck to his house, he received a complaint that he was bringing home junk cars. Attorney Hawkins stated the ordinance does not allow the business in a residential area. Every time this has gone to court, Mr. Lund has not prevailed. Mr. Lund - stated there isn't a tow company that doesn't do what he does. He provides a service. Junk cars are not brought to his house. He accused the City Planner of wanting to get him out of the City, but he is providing a service with decent looking trucks. Attorney Hawkins again advised Mr. Lund to discuss these items with his attorney. Winslow Holasek. 1159 Andover Boulevard NW - referenced the Council discussion at the last meeting on the use of MSA funds to construct a bridge across Coon Creek between the proposed Crown pointe and Crown pointe East developments. He understands the total cost of the bridge and streets in each development comes to $503,000. The developer will reimburse $100,000. The policy in the past has been the residents are only assessed for the cost of a residential street, and MSA funds are . ... . _.~ ~_. , used for the remaining costs of an MSA street. Based on figures given Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 2 (Resident Forum, Con tinued) to him by Mr. Erickson, he calculated the residents would pay for about $50,000 for the street in one development, and $50,000 would be received in the future when the undeveloped land is platted. He did not think the pay back of about $200,000 for a $503,000 project is a good return. No one can argue the need for a bridge for safety reasons, but MSA roads are gas tax refunds that should be used for roads which help expedite traffic in the City. He didn't believe that was the primary use of this particular designation. If the creek was not there, would the City still designate that as an MSA route? He didn't think so. He didn't believe the cost of the bridge should be paid for from tax funds. AGENDA APPROVAL Add Item 6a, Reschedule Next Council Meeting; Item 25, Approve Quotes/IP93-7/Toilet Partitions/City Hall Park Complex #2; and an Executive Meeting with the Attorney regarding the Weybridge 3rd Litigation. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Dehn, agenda approval as amended. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote. CONSENT AGENDA Item 7 Approve Easement Encroachment Agreement/15073 Zilla Street Item 8 Approve Revised Final Plat/Nightingale Ridge (See Resolution R024-96) Item 9 Declare Costs/Order Assessment Roll/IP95-25!1529 148th Lane NW (See Resolution R025-96) Item 10 Adopt Assessment Roll/IP95-25/1529 148th Lane NW (See Resolution R026-96) Item 11 Approve Resolution Identifying Deferred Assessments/IP95-14 with a change in Item 2, The assessments will be deferred without interest until such time as connection is requested by the property owner. (See Resolution R027-96) Item 12 Variance/139xx Round Lake Boulevard (See Resolution R028-96) Item 13 Authorization to Purchase Utility Van/Water Department Item 14 Declare Costs/Order Hearing/IP94-10/Jonathan Woods (See Resolution R029-96) Item 15 Waive Hearing/Adopt Assessment Roll/IP94-10/Jonathan Woods (See Resolution R030-96) Item 16 Declare Costs/Order Assessment Roll!IP93-31/Woodland Creek 4th (See Resolution R031-96) Item 17 Waive Hearing/Adopt Assessment Roll/IP93-31/Woodland Creek 4th (See Resolution R032-96) Item 18 Declare Costs/Order Assessment Roll/IP95-1/Woodland Creek 5th (See Resolution R033-96) Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 3 (Consent Agenda, Continued) Item 19 Waive Hearing/Adopt Assessment Roll/IP95-1/Woodland Creek 5th (See Resolution R034-96) Item 20 Amend Ordinance 98/Lawful Gambling Item 21 Approve Change Order #8 (Compensating) Hills of Bunker 5th/IP93-12 (See Resolution R035-96) Item 22 Final Payment/Hills of Bunker Lake 5th/IP93-12 (See Resolution R036-96) Item 23 Approve Quotes/IP93-7/Roll Up Kitchen Doors/City Hall Park Complex #2 Item 24 Approve Purchase of File Storage Equipment Item 25 Approve Quotes/IP93-7/Toilet Partitions/City Hall Park Complex #2 MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Dehn, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote with Mayor McKelvey voting present on Item 20. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 6,1996, Regular Meeting: Add as discussion prior to the Motion on MSA Designation Through Crown pointe/Crown Pointe East, Page 12: Councilmember Knight asked who initiated the proposal. Mr. Erickson stated this was discussed between Staff and the developer. It was a Staff initiation to provide Council other options to review regarding accesses to these properties. Mayor McKelvey stated this is something that came up in a discussion between the developer and Staff on a possible way of working out the bridge and also working out the lawsuits now pending against the City on another parcel. February 6, 1996, HRA Mee ting: Correct as written. February 6, 1996, EDA Meeting: Correct as written. January 29, 1996, Special Meeting: Correct as written. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Dehn, approval all three Minutes of February 6. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, approval of the Minutes for January 29. Motion carried on a 3-Yes, I-Present (Dehn) , I-Absent (Kunza) vote. PROCLAMATION/VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK Mayor McKelvey read the proclamation declaring the week of March 3 - 10, 1996, as Volunteers of America Week in the City of Andover. COON CREEK WALKWAY/BIKEWAY/TRAIL DISCUSSION/IP95-24 Mr. Erickson explained the City has received a DNR Trail Grant for the Coon Creek Bikeway/Walkway Trail which would run from the Bunker Hills Park, up the railroad tracks, and west along Coon Creek to Crosstown Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 4 (Coon Creek Walkway/Bikeway/Trail Discussion/IP95-24, Con tinued) Boulevard. The grant would contribute 20 percent of the cost and the project must be constructed by the end of 1997. The City would need to identify and dedicate approximately $200,000 to this project in order to proceed with it. The cost includes the purchase of easement as well as the actual cost of construction. Staff has identified several possible sources of funding, including the TIF Fund, Park Dedication, PIR, and in-house street funding. Mr. Carlberg stated CDBG guidelines do not allow those funds to be used for the construction of new trails. Mr. Fursman then gave a presentation on a proposed Capital Improvements Budget for the years 1996 through 2000 indicating funding sources and possible projects. Undesignated funds are located in the TIF Fund, the PIR Fund, the Water Fund and Park Dedication. Projects to be considered include the new City Hall facility, development of Public Works building, rehabilitation of the existing City Hall, aid for the redevelopment of Bunker Lake Boulevard, a Community Center, the North Commercial Park site, Phase 2 development of the Kelsey-Round Lake regional park, ball field lights for the City Hall Complex #2, trail development, and others. Councilmember Jacobson agreed the trail system should be developed and felt the use of TIF funds would be the best vehicle to fund it, though he did think the Park Board should contribute toward that project froĊ“ its Park Dedication fund since it is a park function. Councilmember Knight thought it should be funded with either TIF or the PIR fund along with Park Dedication funds. Mayor McKelvey also felt the funds should come from TIF and possibly from Park Dedication and the PIR fund. The Council did not want to use any funding from streets. Councilmember Dehn asked if the trail will be lighted. Mr. Erickson stated typically such trails are not lighted. Park and Recreation Commissioner Dave O'Toole stated the Commission has not discussed the use of Park Dedication funds for this project, but he thought that could be done. He also pointed out the trail will eventually go to Kelsey-Round Lake Park and hopefully up to the City Hall complex. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Dehn, to direct Staff to prepare a Resolution and determine the proper funding as recommended, with some to come from Park Dedication, and come back to the Council. DISCUSSION: Councilmember Jacobson pointed out something will need to be done to keep the snowmobilers off the trails. Mr. Erickson stated that will be taken into consideration. Normally the trails are not plowed in the winter and would be available for cross-country skiing. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote. DISCUSS MODIFIED CUL-DE-SAC LAYOUTS Mr. Erickson asked for Council input on an alternate layout for cul-de- sacs. The idea behind this design is to achieve additional green space and a unique development plan. The proposal is to have a landscaped >---.. - ~ -------._-~. - - ---~_._- Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 5 (Discuss Modified Cul-de-Sac Layouts, Con tinued) center island in the cul-de-sac or leave it in a natural condition, with one-way traffic around it, possibly with no parking or parking on one side only. The Fire Department is concerned with reduced turning ability from such a design. The Andover Review Committee was also concerned with the additional maintenance that may result from the center median. Councilmember Dehn had a concern with safety for the children, especially since there are no sidewalks. Councilmember Jacobson thought it is an added amenity to the subdivision from an aesthetics point of view; however, the entire City would end up subsidizing that amenity because of the maintenance. He didn't think the Council should ask the taxpayers to be paying for the maintenance of those center medians. He felt it may be appropriate if the developer would enter into an agreement to pay for maintenance for a lengthy period of time or if they would be maintained by a homeowners' association within the subdivision itself. He did not feel the City should have to expend funds on those amenities. The Council agreed. The Council recessed to hold an HRA meeting, 7:52; reconvened at 8:10 p.m. INTERVIEW CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FIRMS The Council then interviewed representatives from the following firms to consider contracting a construction management firm for the new City Hall facility: Bossardt Corporation, Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. I Stahl Construction, Amcon CM and E & V Consultants. Bossardt Corpora tion: Wayne LeTourneau, Director of Business Development, and Dave Hanson, Project Management, provided an introduction of their firm, their experiences, the advantages of contracting with a construction manager, and the roles and responsibilities of the various parties involved. They are a pure agency construction management firm. They do not perform architectural services in-house, but they do work with a variety of firms depending on the facility. Their fee of 6 percent is inclusive of all fees, including architecture. Normally architectural fees will be between 3 and 5 percent of the project. Reimbursement fees is exclusive and usually runs 3 1/2 to 5 1/2 percent of the project cost. That have never been involved in any litigation, though they have gone to arbitration as the owner's representative, not based on any fee or performance. The policy of union or nonunion contracts would be established by the City. Part of the construction management process is to eliminate overruns. Once a budget is set up front, they will work with the City to get everythiny covered within that budget. The City can either have a guaranteed fixed cap on prices or it can consider overruns, in which case a contingency would be established in the budget. Their history is being efficient and thorough on the front end to be able to stay within a fixed budget. They usually don't run into much cost overruns with new buildings. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 6 (Interview Construction Management Firms, Continued) While the price guidelines given by the City is a challenge, based on the program as they understand it today, they felt they would still be able to get a composite of solid materials for the exterior, but not a full skin, and provide a quality product. They would expect to have a design for the building to the City within four to six weeks, at which point the Council can decide whether to proceed as is, spend more money, scale back the size or stop the project. They would build it along the base line of trust and understanding that they are in the preliminary stages of evaluation. They have had projects that have taken years to develop. Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. - Craig Kronholm explained they work with clients to come up with a creative solution to problems. They strive for total client satisfaction. On the front end they meet with the City to determine what it is looking for and then bring in the right architect to the team. They submitted a maximum fee for their construction management for on-site personnel and for all office-related reimbursable. It is a not-to-exceed fee; however, the architect cost is not included and would run 4 to 8 percent of the project. The architect would be selected based on what the City wants and the fee would be included in the figure set by the City. The plans will be reworked until everyone agrees. The only time they can exceed the budget is with authorization from the City. He talked with five architects about this project to see if this is realistic. He is very optimistic. The construction management supervisor would be on the project site full time during the construction process. They would defer to the City on union versus nonunion workers. He thought with the proposed budget the building could be hollow block and masonry. He felt they would have something for the Council to consider within three weeks, four weeks maximum. The relationship with the City is on-going until the project is completed. If the City would chose to stop the project for some reason, any work done by Adolfson & Peterson would be gratis. If the cost of the project is increased, their fee would not change unless the length of the project extended beyond the end of this year. That would be negotiated up front, probably with the additional fee proportional. The Council recessed at 8:44; reconvened at 8:48 p.m. Stahl Construction - Michelle Granger and Jim Todd gave a presentation to the Council on their company, the responsibilities they would undertake, and the advantages of contracting with a construction manager. The fees proposed are all inclusive. There are no reimbursable costs, but it does not include architectural fees. Architectural fees would come out of the not-to-exceed figure set by the City and normally runs about 8 percent of the project. A budget would be set as agreed to by the City, and there would be no change to it unless authorized by the City. They are cost sensitive. Normally they do not bid on a project on which they are the construction manager. With the budget as proposed, the exterior would depend on the shape of the building. There are a number of alternatives to brick. Their fee is fixed and probably Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 7 (Interview Construction Management Firms, Continued) would be the same unless construction went over four months. If it runs over six months, something has gone wrong. While most of their work has been with schools, they have completed the Eden Prairie city center. They prefer to work with union but would also work with nonunion contractors. They would be able to bring a rough preliminary to the Council about two weeks after the specific program requirements have been established. If the decision is not to do the project for some reason, they would hope to continue their relationship until the City does choose to proceed. Any responsibility for their fee would depend on how much time they had invested in the project to that point. They were not aware that the figure for the project included $200,000 in furniture costs. Ameon CM - Todd Christopherson reviewed the proj ect requirements, provided reasons why Amcon CM should be hired and outlined the fee structure. Through them, the City would be getting a good quality building at the least cost. Their fee includes the labor costs of the on-site supervision during field construction. Amcon CM's fee would be about 4 percent of the project budget. He felt it is key to start the project early this fall so the majority of it is completed before the winter. Reimbursable costs are not included in their professional fee. He estimated those would be about $30,000 to $40,000 for this project. The architectural fees are included in the amount budgeted by the City. He suggested working with an outside architectural firm, estimating that fee to be between 6 and 7 percent. The budget established by the City is workable, but it is tight. For that cost, he felt the exterior would be a combination of brick and another material. He was not aware that about $200,000 for furnishings was included in the City's budget amount. They charge 10 percent for reimbursable costs to cover overhead. Though they are a small firm, he was confident he would be able to meet the City's needs because of the other partners in the building. He has access to seven other registered professional engineers. If the project takes eight to nine months, the fee is fixed and won't change. If it goes beyond that, the fee would be his rate times cost times 60 percent. He did not think a full-time person is warranted for a project this size. He would be able to have something for the Council to consider by late April. If the project is stopped for some reason, he would break the fee into a project management fee and a site superintendent fee divided over 13 months on the project, and propose to bill the City on a monthly basis while consulting on the project. There would be no further billing if the project did not proceed. The contract could either be closed or left open. E & V Consul tants - Bob Struve, President, Barry Badinger, proj ect Manager, and Todd Shell, project coordinator and field construction manager, provided some background on their firm. Construction support costs, which run 2 to 2 1/2 percent of the construction costs, are paid by the City and are not included in their fee. In reading the City's proposal, the architectural costs are to be included in the budget cost. They would recommend the City hire an architectural firm, and they would help with that selection prQcess, which would be similar to what the Council is doing now to select a construction management firm. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 8 (Interview Construction Management Firms, Continued) Architectural fees are approximately 6 percent of a project like this. They estimated this project as budgeted to be about $67 per square foot, which could be a metal stud structure probably with some wood or other materials. They would first find out what the City's expectations are. The $72,000 is their management fee. The cost for part-time field service, which is over and above the fee, would be billed at an hourly rate. They were not aware that the budget included $200,000 for furnishings. They would be able to have something for the Council to consider before the end of April. If the project were stopped for some reason, their fee is negotiable, probably based on their knowledge of the proj ect. It is very common in both construction management and architectural contracts to limit the amount of financial exposure the City would have. That type of financial safety net could be written into a negotiated contract with E and V Consultants. (The Council selected a construction management firm later in the meeting. See Page 9 of these Minutes.) The Council recessed to hold an EDA meeting, 10:07; reconvened at 10:10. WALKWAY/BIKEWAY/TRAIL DISCUSSION Mr. Erickson explained this issue is a result of the Mission Statement and externalities discussions. The Planning and Zoning Commission has discussed this item and is making two recommendations: 1) Five-foot wide concrete sidewalks be required in new developments in the urban area only along one side of the higher volume streets, not every street. In addition, flexibility is to be maintained so the Planning Commission and City Council can look at each subdivision on a case-by-case basis. A maintenance program should also be established. 2) Require bikeways and walkways to be constructed, but fees should be collected as a part of new developments or with all building permits. The City would then construct the bikeways in a logical system. Research would need to be done to develop a fee structure to collect from new developments or along with building permits to help subsidize the construction of that system. Right of way would be collected as needed in new developments. Councilmember Jacobson generally liked the idea of sidewalks in subdivisions on only one side of the street and only on collector streets when needed. He also preferred collecting a fee for the bikeway system on all building permits to spread the cost to all residents. His only concern was with the bikeway/walkway map of the comprehensive plan. He suggested that the plan for trails be reviewed again. It does not seem feasible to construct trails along every major roadway in the City, nor did he think that was ever the intent. His preference would be to create three or four nice trails through areas that would be aesthetically pleasing. The plan needs to be condensed into a manageable size and get it away from going along every street. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 9 (Walkway/Bikeway/Trail Discussion, Continued) Mr. Erickson explained interior sidewalks are generally concrete, not asphalt. The sidewalks could either be installed as a part of the infrastructure by the developer or installed by the builder at the time the lot is developed. winslow Holasek - felt that by having the sidewalks installed when the plat is developed, they will be broken up when the houses are constructed. He suggested they be handled the same way as the last lift of the street. The developer would escrow for the sidewalks and the installation would occur when a majority of the homes in the plat have been constructed. Mr. Erickson and the Council felt that is a good point. The Council directed Staff to draft a resolution regarding fees for the bikeway/trail way system. The ordinances already allow the City to require sidewalks as needed. DISCUSSION/CONTRACT FOR MOWING SERVICES MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Dehn, that the Council authorize the City Administrator or other Staff to develop a contract for mowing services and bring that contract back to the Council for review before they send anything out. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote. RESCHEDULE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING The March 5, 1996, regular City Council meeting cannot be held on that day because of precinct caucuses held that day. The Council agreed to move the meeting to Wednesday, March 6, 1996, 7:00 p.m. SELECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FIRM The Councilmembers each stated their preference of two firms, then moved the following: MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Dehn, to pick Adolfson & Peterson, Inc., as the construction management firm. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 1- Absent (Kunza) vote. MAYOR/COUNCIL INPUT Snowmobile Ordinance signs - Councilmember Dehn suggested the City install small signs on some of the other City signs that state, "Snowmobile Ordinance Enforced" to remind people there is an ordinance and rules that need to be followed. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 20, 1996 Page 10 (Mayor/Council Input, Continued) The City's development - Councilmember Dehn stated she received a phone call from a resident who was very concerned with the rapid pace at which the City is developing. There was a special concern about the rural areas and the wetlands. She noted an example of where there needs to be some caution is with the trail system. Placing a trail system adjacent to a practicing agricultural ~u~ess~an create a very difficult situation for the farmer. Cebl~ ~ r Jð.~uL"ull noted that if a person's property is within the development area, the City does not have the authority to deny the property owner the right to development if desired. No specific direction was given on this item. Sidewalks in the Crooked Lake Boulevard reconstruction project - Councilmember Jacobson stated he received a phone call from someone who lives just off of Crooked Lake Boulevard who asked the Council' to reconsider the installation of sidewalks along that street. He suggested if the people were serious about that, they should bring in a petition to do so. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Mr. Fursman stated Staff is meeting with Metropolitan Council representatives next week to discuss the City's request for a Major Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Dehn, to approve the payment of claims (for $281,940.60). Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote. The Council recessed to hold an Executive Session with the City Attorney on the Weybridge 3rd litigation, 10:46; reconvened at 11:16 p.m. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Dehn, to adjourn. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent (Kunza) vote. The meeting was adjourned at 11:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, f{\\~ -~~J Marcella A. Peach Recording Secretary