Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC October 1, 1991 ~ CITY of ANDOVER Regular City Council Meeting - october 1, 1991 7:30 P.M. Call to order Resident Forum - Speakers are limited to 5 minutes each with a maximum of 15 minutes. Items requiring Council discussion will be placed on the next available agenda. Agenda Approval Approval of Minutes Discussion Items I. Special Use Permit/North Lexington Landscaping 2. Special Use Permit/17615 Roanoke Street N.W. 3. Special Use Permit/17600 Ward Lake Drive/Home Occupation 4. Lot Split/74 Andover Boulevard Staff, Committee, Commission 5. Charter Commission, Cont. 6. Lower Rum River Water Management Organization Insurance 7. Hire Public Works Employee 8. Communications Systems/Fire Stations 1 and 2 9. Approve Change Order/Fire Trucks Non-Discussion Items 10. QCTV Proclamation 11. Award Bid/91~14/l6Bth Lane N.W. 12. Approve Final payment/BB-35 13. Approve Final payment/90-25 14. Accept Easement/159th Avenue 15. Accept Streets/Genthon Ponds Mayor/Council Input Approval of Claims Adjournment . - ~ "._0 _ - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER 1, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESIDENT FORUM . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 AGENDA APPROVAL · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 2 SPECIAL USE PERMIT/NORTH LEXINGTON LANDSCAPING Resolution R145-91 approving permIt · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 2 SPECIAL USE PERMIT/ACCESSORY STRUCTURE/17615 ROANOKE STREET NW . · 2 ResolutIon R146-91 approving permit · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 3 SPECIAL USE PERMIT/17600 WARD LAKE DRIVE/HOME OCCUPATION ResolutIon R147-91 approvIng permIt · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 3 LOT SPLIT/74 ANDOVER BOULEVARD . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 3 Resolution R148-91 approvIng lot split · · · · · · · · · · 4 ORDINANCE INTERPRETATION/WINDSCHITL Motion clarIfying sIdeyard setbacks. · · · · · · · · · · · 4 GRADING PLAN FOR AREA SOUTH OF WDE SITE Motion to Inform EPA of City's approval of plan · · · · · · 5 LETTERS TO EPA/WDE SITE Motion to EPA to submit amendment to Comprehensive Plan · · · · 5 Motion to Met Council to submIt amendment/ Comprehensive Plan · 6 CHARTER COMMISSION (Veiman, Sabel. WInds chit I) · · · · · · · · · 6 NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS CommunicatIons System for FIre StatIons 1 and 2 . · · · · · · · 6 Change Order for Fire Trucks · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 6 ResolutIon R149-91 - QCTV ProclamatIon' · · · · · · · · · · · · 7 Resolution R150-91 - award bld/91-14 · · · · · · · · · · · · · 7 Resolution R151-91 - award final payment/88-35 · · · · · · · · 7 Resolution R152-91 - award final payment/90-25 · · · · · · · · 7 Accept easement/159th Avenue/Esther Olson · · · · · · · · · · · 7 LOWER RUM RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION INSURANCE · · · · · 7 HIRE PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE (ChrIs Olson) · · · · · · · · · · · · · 7 ACCEPT STREETS/GENTHON PONDS . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 7 MAYOR AND COUNCIL INPUT City Tax Increase. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 9 School District No. 15 FacIlitIes Committee. · · · · · · · · · 9 Dralnage/157th Lane Project Motion for City and affected owners to resolve the issue · · 9 APPROVAL OF CLAIMS . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 9 ADJOURNMENT . . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 9 ..- . ~ CITY of ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER 1. 1991 MINUTES The Regu]ar Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Ken Orttel on October 1 , 1991, 7:30 p.m., at at the Andover City HaJl. 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover. Minnesota. Councllmembers present: Jacobson, McKelvey. Perry. Smi th Councilmembers absent: None A]so present: City Attorney, WI]JIam G. Hawk 1 ns Planning and Zoning Commission ChaIrperson. RandY Peek Assistant City Engineer. Todd Haas City Planner. David Carlberg CIty Finance Director, Howard Ko01Ick City Administrator, James Schrantz Others RESIDENT FORUM Jerrv Windschitl. 3640 152nd'Lane NW - requested time to appeal an ordinance interpretation made by Staff regarding the location of a house on a lot. It is an Issue of a 5-foot setback, and he doesn't believe the Staff is interpreting the ordinance as written. The only way to meet the Staff's recommendation Is to reduce the sIze of the house. Counc i I asked the Attorney to review the issue wi th Mr. Windschitl and agreed to place the item on the Agenda for further discussion. Duane ? . Andover Boulevard - heard of an alarming incident that took p]ace last Saturday evening, ear]y Sunday morning In the vIcinity of Prairie Road and 158th. A party got out of hand where a co]ored gang came in. Someone was clubbed. someone was run over by a vehicle. and guns were pulled. He said 911 was cal led three times before someone responded. stating this Is extremely alarming. He felt consideration shou1d be given to changing the Police Department in the City if necessary. He also felt that people should be made aware of such incidents, as he only heard about I t third hand. Counc i I was not aware of the Incident but agreed to look Into It further, especially to determine the response times and procedures taken. AGENDA APPROVAL It was agreed to add the fol lowIng Items: Item 4a, Ordinance Interpretation/Windschitl; Item 4b. Grading Plan for Area South of WDE Site: and Item 4c. Letters to EPA/WDE Site. MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by McKelvey. the Agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously. .- ...-~. - Regu]ar City Council MeetI ng Minutes - October 1, 1991 Page 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 17. 1991 - Correct as wrItten. MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Smith, the Minutes of September 17 as written. Motion carrIed unanimously. SPECIAL USE PERMIT/NORTH LEXINGTON LANDSCAPING Chairperson Peek reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Specla] Use PermIt to mIne soIl requested by North Lexington Landscaping. Mr. Haas stated he has not yet inspected the site, but I t Is expected that Pond 1 will be completed before beginning in the area of this permit. He also explained the permit is for a maximum of five years; however, the CI ty issues only a one-year permi t and application must be made each year. Counc i I asked that the Resolution be worded to reflect that. MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Smith, a Resolution approving a SpeciaJ Use Permit requested by North Lexington Landscaping to mine soi I from the property described as that part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11-32-24 as required per Ordinance 8. Section 4.24, wIth the folJowing changes: It em 11, the length of the perml t wi II be In one-year increments for a maximum of five years. Add Item 12. the permi t is only good if the work on Pond No. 1 is in complIance wIth what the applicant agreed to when he gained the permit for It. (See Resolution R145-91) MotIon carried unanlmousJy. SPECIAL USE PERMIT/ACCESSORY STRUCTURE/17615 ROANOKE STREET NW Chairperson Peek reviewed the Commission's recommendation to approve a Special Use Permit requested by John Ewert to construct an accessory structure on adjacent property prior to the constructIon of a principal structure. Because of the ScenIc Rum RIver OrdInance, Mr. Ewert Is not able to construct the accessory structure on the lot of his princIpal structure. The request is simlJiar to one approved last month In whIch the owner was required to link the two parcels by restrictive covenant. The property on whIch the accessory structure is to be constructed Is approximately 16.5 acres. zoned R-2. Mr. Carlberg reported the DNR has been contacted and has no probJem wi th the request. The Counc I ] discussed the optIon of requiring the two parcels to be combIned sInce they abut each other rather than to link them by restrictive covenant. The appJIcant was not in attendance at the meeting; however, Mr. Carlberg reported the appJicant did not wish to combine the parcels for tax purposes. Mr. Ewert does have the minimum acreage required for each lot. 'þ- . Regular City Council Meet i ng Minutes - October 1 , 1991 Page 3 (Special Use Permit/Accessory Structure/ 17615 Roanoke, Continued) Mr. CarJberg stated there is a precedent of a simI1Iar request being approved on a separate lot adjoining the lot with the principal structure. CouncIlmember Smith thought Mr. Ewert would be able to app]y for homestead credIt on the vacant parcel since It Is contIguous to the lot with the prIncipaJ structure. After further discussion. the Counc II felt that because the acreage Is suffIcient and there Is some question about the buIldabIIIty of the vacant lot, that I t Is not necessary to combine the parcels as long as there is a restrictIve covenant JInking the use to the exIstIng prlncIpaJ structure on the adjoining property untl I a principal structure Is built on the lot. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith. the ResoJutIon granting the Special Use PermIt request of John Ewert to construct an accessory on the property Jocated at 17615 Roanoke Street NW, wIth the change: It em 1, the properties be linked by restrictive convenant, and that convenant be approved by the City Attorney prior to fIling and prior to the issuance of the buIlding permit. (See Resolution R146-91) Motion carried unanImously. SPECIAL USE PERMIT/17600 WARD LAKE DRIVE/HOME OCCUPATION Chairperson Peek reviewed the SpecIal Use PermIt request application of John Audette to operate a home occupation sharpening busIness in an accessory structure at 17600 Ward Lake DrIve. The CommIssIon recommended approval, feeling it qualIfies as a home occupatIon per the ordinance. However. the accessory structure does not meet the 30-foot sideyard setback required by ordInance, and the CommissIon felt a sideyard variance would be required. Mr. Audette has made appJIcation for the varIance and paId the fees. MOTION by Perry. Seconded by Jacobson. the ResolutIon granting the Special Use Permit and variance request of John Audette to operate a home occupation (sharpening service) In an accessory structure encroaching into the required sIdeyard setback at 17600 Ward Lake Drive NW, as presented with the foJ lowing change: Item Number 7 be deleted as a redundant statement and the type of variance that is beIng approved be incJuded. (See ResoJutIon R147-91) MotIon carried unanimously. LOT SPLIT/74 ANDOVER BOULEVARD Chairperson Peek reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the lot spIlt request of Troy and Nancy Harris at 74 Andover Boulevard subject to a one-year sunset clause and the transfer of an additlonaJ road easement of 27 feet on Andover BouJevard to meet county requirements of a 60-foot easement. Mayor Orttel noted that Butternut is an unbuilt street wIth 33 feet of easement. and the parcel being spilt will front on that street. This would be the fourth parcel to front on it. specuJatlng the road probably wi I I not be bu I I t un t i J there is more dense deveJopment. ,~- . Regular City Council Meeti ng MInutes - October 1 , 1991 Page 4 (Lot Split/74 Andover Boulevard. NW) MOTION by SmIth. Seconded by McKelvey, the ResolutIon granting the Jot split request of Troy and Nancy HarrIs to create two parcels pursuant to Ordinance No. 40 IncludIng the condItions descrIbed In the Resolution and with reference to the section In the ordInance regarding the one-year sunset clause. <See Resolution R148-91) Motion carrIed unanlmous]y. ORDINANCE INTERPRETATION/WINDSCHITL Attorney HawkIns explained the issue is the sIdeyard setback from South Coon Creek Drive on Lot 1 . Block 2, KensIngton Estates. It Is proposed to be 29.83 feet. Ordinance 8PP states that the sideyard setback must be 25 feet but has an asterisk Indicating that that appJies un]ess existing or proposed structures would IndIcate a different setback to maintain uniformity. The houses on Lots 9 through 12 all have a setback of 35 feet. whIch is the old standard. The question is whether the setback on Lot 1 shou]d be 35 a]so. Mr. Hawkins continued that the houses on Lots 9 through 12 front on South Coon Creek Drive, but Lot 1 wouJd front on 145th Avenue. Because It doesn't face the same directIon. he didn't feel the ordinance indIcates It should be a 35-foot setback. Mr. Schrantz exp]aIned the BuIlding Inspector Interpreted the ordInance as requIring a 35-foot setback to maintain unIformity In that area. Mr. Carlberg noted the table In the ordInance was not changed to match the ordinance change In OrdInance 8PP. The tabl e IndIcates the sIdeyard should be 35 feet. Mayor Orttel stated the table dIdn't get changed when the ordInance was amended. Jerrv Windschltl - reviewed the proposal and showed how the house would be considerab]y behInd any visual line of sight. In discussing the matter further. It was noted that the curve In the road Is a factor. The consensus of the Counc II was that the provIsIon in the ordInance Is to prohIbIt someone's house from sticking out In front of the others. the uniformIty applying to the sight I ine of the houses along the street. It was fe It the interpretation of the ordinance is a 25-foot sldeyard setback unless a sight problem wil I be created or it wi II be unattractive to the neighborhood. With the bend in the road In this case. they didn't feel there was a problem with the I ine of sight. MOTION by McKelvey. Seconded by Jacobson. that the sight line of the houses is the responsible code rather than the distance from the curb ] ine, and that the proposal on the corner of 145th Avenue NW and South Coon Creek Drive does meet the ordinance. Mot! on carr i ed unanImously. 'þ- , Regular City Counci1 Meet! ng Minutes - October 1 . 1991 Page 5 GRADING PLAN FOR AREA SOUTH OF WDE SITE Mayor Orttel reported there Is a 106 Order to clean up the WDE site whIch Includes some very strict tIme contr01s. The unreso1ved Issues are those the CIty had agreed to In the City Attorney's letter wrItten in June. They are asking that the grading plan for fill on the property just south of the WDE site be approved. The plan 1eaves the wooded area to the west unexcavated as a buffer from the residential houses and Is basically the same plan approved earlier th I s year. A clean-up work plan Is requIred by October 14 and an amended plan done by the fIrst of the year. It Is hoped the work wIll begIn by Spring. 1992. The Mayor also reported that other tests are stilI needed, but the though t is also that It may be possIble to pump the groundwater dir-ectly into the sanitary sewer system without treatment. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by SmIth. that we direct Staff and have the Mayor sIgn the letter of Intent to the EPA outlIning the City's general approval wi th the gradIng pJan as presented. identifying the gradIng plan tor Alternate B. The City would be willing to act on the mining permit which meets the crIteria of this outline as soon as the owner of the property applies for said permit. MotIon carried unanimously. LETTERS TO EPA/WDE SITE Mayor Orttel asked for approval to submi t a letter to Fred Bartman, EPA. that the CIty Council approves the submittIng of an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan to provide sanitary sewer capacity for- the WDE site IIpumpoutll of effluent In the amount of 60 to 100 gallons per minute, continuous pumping 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. He has met wIth the Metropolitan CouncIl and MetropolItan Waste Control, and It was agreed this would be a very sImplified Comprehensive Plan amendment because no housing Is Involved. Mayor Orttel also reported that the Metropolitan Waste ControJ Commission has stated they wIll shut off any of these pumpouts If It becomes a problem of capacity for housing, because the system was not desIgned for any of the pumpouts goIng on now. The Mayor also reported the payment for the use of the sanitary sewer system. notIng the change In the MWCC's policy. They wIll now be charging a fee for groundwater pumpouts Instead of a SAC charge. The fee Is 30 cents per 1,000 ga1lons. In addition to that. MWCC charges the City the fu II char-ge that a homeowner would charge. which Is $1.09/1,000 gallons. So the total cost to the WDE Gr-oup is considerably more than what was origInally thought. The Group wi I J need to balance the costs of equIpment to meet the FederaJ discharge laws to put the pure water Into Coon Creek versus paying the costs of using the sewer system. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith. approva1 to send the letter as proposed to Fred Bartman, U.S, EPA. MotIon carried unanimously. ,-- Regular CIty CouncIJ Meeting MInutes - October 1. 1991 Page 6 (Letters to EPA/WDE Site. Continued) Mayor Orttel asked for approval to send the letter prepared by Staff to Richard Thompson, Research and Long Range PlannIng at the Metropolitan Council to alert them of the City's request for a ComprehensIve Plan amendment. MOTION by Smi th. Seconded by Perry. approve this letter to be sent to Richard Thompson. Metropolitan Council. Motion carried unan Imousl y. CHARTER COMMISSION The Counc i I discussed the possibIlIty of submItting the name of a Councilmember to serve on the CommIssion. There are three terms which expIre on November 3. 1991. and all three members have expressed a desire to be reappoInted to the CommIssion. Jerry Windschitl. Chairperson of the Charter CommissIon - reported the Commission met frequently in the begInnIng but are now meeting once or twIce a year. The CommissIon researched the issue of a Charter for the CIty and unanimously agreed that the present system of government is functIonIng adequately and that there Is no need for a change. The CommIssIon revIewed Items of sIgnifIcance as they are brough t up. The other i tern they looked at was establishing a primary for local eJections. A motIon was made that the City Council use its power to set up a prImary to elIminate that large number of peopJe running for only two positIons. Staff was asked to determine whether the Counc I J has the authorIty to estabJ ish a JocaJ primary. The Counc I 1 aJso agreed to recommend the reappointment of the CommIssIoners but to have a lIason from the Counc I J attend theIr meetIngs. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith. that the City CounciJ submi t the folJowIng names to the DIstrict Court Judge for reappoIntment as members of the Andover Charter CommissIon for four-year terms: Charles Velman. Gretchen Sabel. and Jerry WlndschItl; and at the same tIme, we adopt a 1 Iason person rep~esentIng the CIty CouncIl who wouJd sit but not have a vote, and that person to be Marge Perry. MotIon carried unanImously. NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by SmIth, in the affirmative: Item No. 8, CommunicatIons System for Fire Stations 1 and 2 for the ¡ow bid as presented Item No. 9, Approve change order for the Fire Trucks to take care of the deduct that was not included In the previous change order .~--. Regular City CouncIl Meet i ng Minutes - October 1 . 1991 Page 7 (Non-Discussion Items. Motion Continued) No. 10. Approve the OCTV Proclamation (See ResolutIon R149-91) No. 11 . Award the Bid for 91-14 on 168th as presented (See ResolutIon R150-91) No. 12. Approve the FIna] Payment/88-35 as presented (See Resolution R151-91) Item 13. Approve the Final Payment/90-25 as presented (See Resolution R152-91) Item 14, Accept easement on 159th Avenue as presented (From Esther W. Olson) Motion carried unanimously. LOWER RUM RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION INSURANCE Mayor Orttel gave the background information relating to insurance for the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization. He felt the errors or omission coverage should be available. but he wondered if the members of the OrganizatIon have that coverage under the City's insurance as City employees because part of their duties involve their being a CIty empioyee. That question has not been answered, and he suggested that be looked Into further. Total protection for the Organization members would amount to about $700 per City, After further dIscussion. the Mayor asked for a motIon to support the proposal from the Lower Rum RIver Water Management OrganIzation for Insurance. MOTION by Perry. Seconded by SmIth. to so move. MotIon carried unanimousJy. HIRE PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE MOTION by Perry. Seconded by McKe]vey. the hIring of Chris O]son as Public Works employee as recommended by City Staff at a starting salary of $8.76 per hour with an Increase to be determined after successfully completIng a six-month probationary perIod. Motion carried unanImous]y, ACCEPT STREETS/GENTHON PONDS Mr. Schrantz reported Staff is recommending the Letter of Credit to the developer for Genthon Ponds AddItion be reduced to $10,177. However. there Is a problem with the quality of the streets. noting the test failures in asphalt thickness. density tests and oil content. He was very concerned with the streets not meeting the CIty's two-inch minimum thickness requirement, not knowing how that happened because the CIty did have an inspector on the job. a_ . Regular City Council Meet i ng Minutes - October 1 , 1991 Page 8 <Accept Streets/Genthon Ponds. Continued) Mr. Schrantz recommended a solution of requiring a maIntenance bond from the contractor for two years at 100 percent and a cost sharing wi th the City 50/50 for the thIrd year. It Is felt that If the road would break uP. It would be In the first two to three years when the housIng constructIon Is takIng place. HIs concern Is not wantIng thIs thickness to become the CIty's new standard. Uldis ? Buck Blacktop. contractor for the developer - stated the . bondIng company knows the total value of the Job and wll I give them a maintenance bond for the tota I amount. He also explained the process of paving streets pointing out the efforts made so the road wi I I be as smooth as possible and to meet the specifications. Because the intent of the paver Is to provide a smooth road. the operator would not change the thickness of the asphalt In the middle of the job. When the job was beIng done, the Ci ty Inspector was comfortable with what was being done. The City's density Is 97 percent, whIch Is hIgher than the State requirement of 95 percent. Because of the I ight design of the road. 5 ton. he stated that Increasing the density with greater compaction would have destroyed the road. He also stated that normally they are not subject to double jeopardy. If I t Is Inspected at the time the job Is done, I t Is considered accepted. Kirk Corson. Hokanson Development. deveJoper of the proiect - stated he was on site the day the paving was done and talked to the CIty Inspector. The job was three-fourths done and. the Inspector saId everything was goIng fine, that the requIrements were beIng met. It wasn't untIl two weeks after that poInt that he found out there was a problem. He contended If he was told there was a problem when the job was beIng done. they would have corrected It Immediately. The Counc II was concerned that there was a 75 percent failure rate on the thickness and density tests. and a 10 percent failure on the 011 content. After considerable dIscussIon. the Counc i I dIrected that an independent fIrm be asked to eIther test the road again or make an interpretation of the existing data and make a recommendation as to whether or not the road Is acceptable. Mr. Corson didn't fee] i t Is his responslbllty to pay for an independent testing of the thIckness when they relied on the CIty inspector: however. he wouId be wIlling to pay for the Interpretation of the density and oiJ tests. The Counc I I agreed to have the independent firm te I I the City If there were errors made and by whom: and if there Is some degree of error on the part of the City, the City will pay that portion of the consultant's fee. It was agreed that Mr. Corson and the Staff wi I I come to an agreement as to what independent firm should be selected. ,Þ--. Regular CIty Council Meet I ng Minutes - October 1. 1991 Page 9 MAYOR AND COUNCIL INPUT Ci ty Tax Increase - Mr. Koollck was asked to prepare Information for the Counc i I regarding the the tax Increase for the CIty. specIfIcally the percentage of increases due to the Fire Department bond, State Aid cuts. etc. School DistrIct No. 15 Facilities Committee - Councllmember Perry reported the committee held Its organizational meetIng. It will be meeting once a month and wIll be looking at the facIlItIes they have and what to do to meet the proJ ected popu I at! on growth. Pay Warren. 5744 NIQhtlnQale - was frustrated that he Is beIng pressured Into makIng a decIsIon to give easement over his property for draInage resulting from the street project on 157th Lane and Swallow. The City knew about the project for several months. yet he was approached only last week. He was concerned that the water will soak into the ground and raise the water level In his front yard. He is not willing to have a water problem created. Jerrv WindschItl - stated he owns the ditch south of the proj ect. which Is a private dItch. It is In a bad state of repair; and unless it is repaired. it wi I J not take the water. He stated alJ the CIty is doIng is pushing the water from the street to Mr. Warren and to him. None of them want the water unless there Is a final so] uti on to the drainage. He fe 1 t the proposa] changes the water from one watershed to another. Counc I J was frustrated that the project was Jet without all easements acquIred. Mr. Schrantz stated the draInage Is being designed for the 100-year storm. MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Perry, that we ask the City Attorney. the City Engineer and City Consulting Engineer on the project and the property owners Involved to get together at a meetIng to come to some sort of conclusion for us and to come back to the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by McKelvey, the Schedule of Bills in the amount of $659,197.94 be approved. Motion carried unanlmous]y. MOTION by McKelvey to adjourn. Mayor Ortte I declared the meeting adjourned at 10:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~~~lc~~L Ma lla A. Peach. Recording Secretary a_ .