HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC March 19, 1991
~ CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting - March 19, 1991
7:30 P.M. Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Senator Greg Dahl
Discussion Items
8:00 P.M. I. DNR Permit Request/Slyzuk
2. Special Use Permit/Bendtsen Gun Shop
3. Special Use permit/po Hagen Beauty Shop
4 . Variance/Rucks
5. variance/Runke
6. Ordinance 8, Sec. 8.08 Discussion/Curbing
1. Response to Metropolitan Waste Control
8. Coon Creek Watershed Appointment
Staff, Committee, Commission
9. Equestrian Council Applicants
10. Purchase Sewer & Watermain Locator
11. Purchase Gas Detector
12. Approve Solid Waste Joint Powers Agreement
13. Approve Goodwill Industries Agreement
14. Amend Fire Truck Bids
15. Order Ad for Rids/Air Packs/Fire Dept.
16. Approve Revised By-Laws/Firefighters Relief Assn.
11. Assessment Abatement, Cant.
18. DARE Contribution
19. Approve Storm Sewer Base Maps
20. Accept old Constance Boulevard
2I. Rename Constance Boulevard
22. Assessment policy
Non-Discussion items
23. Award Bids/90-12 & 90-13
24. Award Bid/Fire Stations/90-26
25. Approve Plans & Specs/90-25
26. Receive Petition/Creekview Crossing/91-2
21. Accept Feasibility Report/91-1/Crosstown Dr.
28. Receive February Financial Reports
Mayor/Council Inp¡.t
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
1 .- ----- . ~,._.,.. . ."-.. - , - - .
REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING - MARCH 19, 1991
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RESIDENT FORUM . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1
AGENDA APPROVAL · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1
APPROVAL OF MINUTES · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 2
RESOLUTION R028-91 (Special Use Permlt/Bendtsen Gun Shop) · · · · 2
RESOLUTION R029-91 (Special Use Permlt/P. Hagen Beauty Shop) · · · 3
VARIANCE/RUCKS . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 3
Motion to table/reter Items to P & Z · · · · · · · · · · · · · 4
DNR PERMIT REQUEST/SLYZUK · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 5
VARIANCE/RUNKE . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8
RESOLUTION R030-91 (Deny Runke Variance) · · · · · · · · · · · · · 9
ORDINANCE 8, SECTION 8.08 DISCUSSION/CURBING . · · · · · · · · · · 9
Motion to hold public hearing. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 10
RESPONSE TO METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
Motion to correct tiguees . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 10
COON CREEK WATERSHED APPOINTMENT
Motion to nominate Bob Boyum, Don Jacobson and Todd Smith · · · 10
EQUESTRIAN COUNCIL APPLICATIONS
Motion to reappoint Don Eveland/Equestrian Council to
Inteevlew othees and make recommendation · · · · · · · · · · · 11
PURCHASE SEWER AND WATERMAIN LOCATOR/GAS DETECTOR · · · · · · · · 11
APPROVE SOLID WASTE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT . · · · · · · · · · · · 11
APPROVE GOODWILL INDUSTRIES AGREEMENT · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 11
AMEND FIRE TRUCK BIDS · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 12
RESOLUTION R031-91 (Award BId/Fire Stations/IP90-26) · · · · · · · 12
ORDER AD FOR BIDS/AIR PACKS/FIRE DEPARTMENT · · · · · · · · · · · 12
RESOLUTION R032-91 (Approve Revised By-Laws/Fleefighters Relief
Association) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 13
ASSESSMENT ABATEMENT . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 13
DARE CONTRIBUTION
Motion to deny · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 13
APPROVE STORM SEWER BASE MAPS · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 14
I -
City of Andover Regular Council Meeting
March 19, 1991
Page 2
RESOLUTION R033-91 (Accept OJd Constance Boulevard) · · · · · · · 14
RENAME CONSTANCE BOULEVARD . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 14
RESOLUTION R034-91 (Assessment Manual Policy and Procedure) · · · 14
NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 14
RESOLUTION R035-91 (SldewaJks/Bent Creek and Creekridge Estates) · 15
RESOLUTION R036-91 (Final Plans and Specs/Mosquito Control) · · · 15
RESOLUTION R037-91 (Adequacy of Petition/Order Feasibility/IP91-2) 15
RESOLUTION R038-91 (Receive Feasibility/Set Hearing/IP91-1) · · · 15
MAYOR AND COUNCIL INPUT
Andover Express Newsletter · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15
PJaque for Fire Station. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15
Oak Grove Demolition Disposal Site · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15
SanItary Sewer and Water BIJllngs . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS . . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 16
ADJOURNMENT . . . . . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 16
1
~ CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - MARCH 19, 1991
MINUTES
The Regular BI-MonthIy Meeting of the Andover City Council was called
to oeder by Mayoe Ken Oettel on March 19, 1991, 7:30 p.m., at at the
Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
CounciImembers present: Jacobson, McKelvey, Perry, Smi th
Councilmembees absent: None
Also present: City Attorney, WI I liam G. Hawkins: City
Plannee, David Carlberg; City Finance
Director, Holwaed Koolick; Ci ty Zoning
Admlnlsteator, d/Arcy Bosell: Planning and
Zoning Commission Chairperson, Ron Ferris:
City Administrator, James Schrantz: othees
RESIDENT FORUM
Chari ie Veiman. 13646 Crooked Lake Boulevard - exp]alned the
procedure of the Mayoe and Councllmembers making a tape summarizing
the Counc i I meetings for cab]e TV. The tapes are run as governmental
eeports on Channe]s 16 and 33. Mr. Veiman explained this will Intorm
the residents at Andover what Is really happening in the City, and he
hoped that the radio and Andovee Express would also begin publishing
news at the City.
Jav Blake. 13425 Uplander - stated he was glad to see the Council
wi II be televising the summary of the Council meetings for the City.
Secondly, he was concerned over the Issue of the City utilizing the
Andover Express as Its officia] City newsletter. Wi th this
pubIic/private partnership, the City has no editorial control. In
this first instance, the paper wrote a very supportive article tor one
ot the candidates running for County Commissionee, and the impl icatlon
was that Andover was endorsing that candidate. He was also conceened
of possible legal action if something racist, deeogatory, or sexist
was said in that section over which the City has no control. Mr. Blake
suggested the City should drop the partnership with Andover Express.
Mayor Oettel stated the CouncIl has some of those same conceens,
noti ng the item will be discussed In the Mayor/Council Input portion
of the Agenda.
AGENDA APPROVAL
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by McKelvey, approve the Agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
I - ..--.-
Regular City Council Meet! ng
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 2
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
March 5, 1991. Regular Meeting - Correct as written.
Maech 5, 1991, HRA Meeting - Correct as written.
March 7, 1991, Joint Meeting with P & Z - Page 3. Second paragraph,
fifth lIne, change to: "...see a density more than
that of the cureent R-4 zone. "
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by McKelvey, the three Minutes as
corrected. Motion carried unanimously.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/BENDTSEN GUN SHOP
Chaleperson Ferris eeviewed the Commission's recommendation to approve
the Special Use Permit request of Robert Bendtsen to operate a gun
sales and repair shop at 1714 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW. The bui Iding
Is vacant at this time. The CommIssIon has also requested that the
Fire Department be made aware that ammunition wI I I be stored on site.
Mr. Carlbeeg stated he Informed the Fire Marshal.
Robert Bendtsen - explaIned the security system that wi I] be
instal led, which was required, betore they could obtaIn Insurance.
They have a special security system with a cal I going to the police
and tire pIus to the owner's home In the event of break-In, vandalism,
or the phone line Is cut. There will also be secuelty lights around
the building. They have eequested the trees be removed from the
teont, but they are on county property and the county does not want to
eemove them.
Chuck Zilla - also explained there are dual motion detectors and
smoke and heat detectors.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Smith, a Resolution granting the
Special Use PermIt request of Robert Bendtsen to operate a gun sales
and repaie shop located at 1714 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW as prepaeed.
(See Resolution R028-91) Motion carried unanImously.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/P. HAGEN BEAUTY SHOP
Chairperson Ferris reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation
to appeove the Special Use Permit request of Pateicla Hagen to operate
an In-home beauty salon at 2646 133rd Lane NW. The CommissIon had
made a recommendation that the the 20 peecent stipulation of Ordinance
No. 8, Section 4.30 ( B) 2 be me t. The City Attoeney has since advised
that that stipulation does not apply since the beauty salon wi]] be
operated from an accessory structure. At their March 12 meeting, the
Planning Commission redrafted their recommendation to delete that
portion at the motion eeteeenclng the 20 percent requirement.
1
Regulae City Council Meetl ng
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 3
(Special Use Perml t/P. Hagen Beauty Shop, Continued)
Chairperson Ferris explained that there was no public Input at the
hearing: however, there were two calls to Staff with regard to the
number of caes on that parcel. The applicant has stated her three
grown children have since moved or are in the process of moving, so
that concern has been eliminated.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by McKeIvey, a Resolution granting the
Special Use Permit request of Patricia Hagen to operate an In-home
beauty salon at 2646 133rd Lane NW. (See Resolution R029-91) Motion
carried unanimously.
VARIANCE/RUCKS
Chairperson Ferris reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation
to deny the variance request of Karolyn Rucks to allow the pIacement
of an accessory structure for the keeping of equines closee to the
wel I than Is permitted by City ordinance at 840 146th Lane NW. The
complaint was tirst brought regarding horses In the tront yard on a
2 1/2-acre lot. The revised Ordinance No. 23 cal Is for horses to
eemaln in the eear yard on paecels five acres or less.
Chairperson Ferris reviewed the background, pointing out Ms. Rucks
received a permit to build the pole barn, but the lean-to in which the
horses are kept was added at a later date without a building permit.
If a bui]ding permit had been applied for, it would not have been
aI]owed because it did not meet the sepaeatlon requirement between the
well and the horse area. The 100-foot separation requirement has
been in Ordinance 8, Section 8.19F, but it was added to Ordinance 23C,
Section IV (C) last fall. They have also found that the State
separation requirement between the well and where horses are stalled
is 50 feet. In this case, the separa tI on Is onIy 24.5 feet. Mayor
Orttel noted when that oedinance was enacted, many at the wells were
shallow wells.
Mr. Carlberg stated he discussed this with John Bills, Chairpeeson of
the Equestrian Council, who feels the City is being too stringent with
the 100-foot separation eequlrement. There is also the question at
grandparenting existing equine operations, which the Equestrian
Counc I I felt had been done with the new Ordinance 23. They were under
the impression that the revised ordinance applied only to new
operations, not existing ones.
Chairperson Ferris also noted the Commission ta]ked about the
possibility of varying the separation to be dependent upon the number
of horses being housed. In this case, it is not just the City's
ordinance, but the State eequirement which makes it more difficult to
I - on _
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 4
(Variance/Rucks, Continued)
grant. The only other place the lean-to can be placed would be in the
southwest corner of the property, where it would have to be a free-
standing building; but he did not believe that would be 100 feet from
the well. With so much of the property not being usable, he questioned
whether this parcel is Jarge enough to keep horses. The rationale for
the one opposing vote on the P & Z was that there should be some
grandparenting peovision to the revised Equine Ordinance.
Several Councilmembers recalled the Equestrian Council sayIng a large
number of existing horse operations wouJd not meet the ordinance
requirements, and the understanding was they would be grandparented
In and the provisions would apply to any new horse operations.
Kaeolvn Rucks. 840 146th Lane - stated the lean-to Is 33 teet team
the we I I . Mr. Carlberg stated he measured it today and found it to be
a 24-foot separation. Dave Almgren, City Building Inspector, stated
the State requires a 50-foot separation from the manure pit and the
wel] . It does not say anything about the shelter, just the manure
pi Ie. Mr. Carlberg stated in the winter, the pileup occurs in the
shelter. The concern is what happens I f her we I I becomes contaminated.
The wel J was tested since the last meeting and no problems were tound.
Ms. Rucks - disagreed, statIng her barn is kept clean all the time.
Her manure pile Is to the west. MC'. Carlberg telt there was a
considerable amount of manure in the lean-to.
In further discussion, the Counc I I general I y fel t i t Is a private
health issue and questIoned whethee the City could legally vary trom
the State eequirement. They also suggested the Planning Commission
look at Ordinance 23 and Ordinance 8 to bring It into compliance with
the State law and look at Including a geandparenting clause in
Ordinance 23. The Issue at shallow wells shouJd also be looked at when
determining the separation. It was agC'eed to table this eequest until
the Planning Commission reviews the separatIon requirement and a
possible grandparenting clause for the Equine Ordinance.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by McKelvey, that we take this variance
and table It for no more than two months to allow the Planning
Commission to examine those three points and to come back with a
recommendation; when that recommendation comes back, bC'lng this
variance back to consIder. DISCUSSION: Councllmembee McKelvey
didn't think a variance could be granted for a 24-toot separation when
the State requires a minimum of 50 teet. CouncllmembeC' Jacobson
preterred deaJing with all items at the same time so Ms. Rucks knows
what she would have to do to meet the requirements. Chairperson Ferris
asked It the Commission should look at whether the 2.5-acre minimum
requirement should be all useable. Counc i 1 generally fe1t that the
ordinance is coerect as is, that even low areas can be used foe
pasture at times.
Motion careled unanimously.
I .---
Regulae City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 5
DNR PERMIT REQUEST/SLYZUK
Tom Hovev. DNR Area HvdeoJoqlst - reviewed the history at DNR Permit
#91-6148, a Protected Waters Permit to pump water from the open ditch
to Coon Creek in Section 29, Township 32, Range 24: and he outlined
the DNR peemltting proceduee.
Dr. Jeanette Leete. PhD. DNR - went into greater detail on the
studies and findings of the DNR. In their studies they found that the
whoJe system is flowing toward Coon Creek: however, the pumping done
by Mr. Slyzuk is negligible, that the water is gal ng wheee It would
go anyway. Their studIes also showed that what was happening to Round
Lake was also happening to other lakes in the area and the two
observatory wells in the area. The apparent changes in the lake Jevel
are due to rain and temperature variatIons.
Dr. Leete stated they created a groundwater modeJ of the aeea on their
computer and ran a program as if the pumping by Mr. SJyzuk was done
continuously. I t showed there is no way the Jake could be affected by
the pumping as much as it had varied. They are saying the variations
on the lake levels were due to climate, not the pumping: and she
showed overhead maps of the eftect on the lake with and without
pumping from Mr. Slyzuk's ditch to Coon Creek. They concluded there
Is seepage from the bottom of the Jake, but they could not concJude
that the seepage would be increased by the pumping.
Charlie Veiman - asked how many acres Is being pumped and can the
water be pumped into Round Lake instead of into Coon Creek.
Ken Slvzuk - stated it is about 75 acees. He ofteeed to pump It
Into Round Lake it someone would put the pipe undee Round Lake
Boulevard. He did not want to bear the cost of that pipe, but he is
willing to cooperate with anyone who wiJI.
Mr. Velman - asked if the watee quality from the ditch Is acceptable
to pump back Into Round Lake. Me. Hovey stated that would have to be
checked, but he felt pumping into Round Lake Is something that could
be done. There is also the issue it dealing with two watersheds, the'
Coon Creek Watershed and the Lower Rum River Water Management
Organization. Mr. Hovey also stated the first permit was for three
years; this reapplication would be a permanent one. The pumping is
done pc imar II y In May and June and some later In the summer.
Mr. Slvzuk - stated the amount of water pumped depends on the
weather. In the spring, the pump runs steady foe a while. It is on
oft-peak, so it runs basically at night, unless more is needed because
of a heavy snow melt oe there Is a lot of rain. It Is haed to say
what is typical. There Is a couple feet difference between the ditch
and the bottom of Coon Creek. The Creek Is a couple teet out at
repair, with the ditch being about where the creek would be It it were
cleaned to the original depth.
I - ,..-
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 6
(DNR Permit Request/Slyzuk, Continued)
.
Mr. Hovey also explained that a new law requires a tlow meter on the
pump or other approved measuring devices, so they wi II be able to get
a bettee idea of how much water Is being pumped.
John Z III haedt. 3753 145th - appreciated the explanation of the
studies. He was st i I I conceened about the levels on Round Lake,
not i ng the time in 1969 when after a spelng run-otf eveeyone expected
the watee level to come up, but instead the water almost disappeared
and the lake became water-logged mud. That happened about the time
the pumping started. The Jake level came back up In April about the
time the pumping stopped. It may have been a matter of timing, but
it was that coincidence that triggered everyone's conceen.
Mr. Hovey felt it was a coincidence, stating even it a dischaege pipe
were piped dieectly from Round Lake, the lake would not be affected
that much.
Steve Wood. 3723 145th Avenue - asked the approximate accuracy of
the computer modelling and it is a reliable Indication at what Is
happening. Dr. Leete stated it is not calibrated. The computer modeJ
lets them know "what 1 f" . They do not have the money to be mace
accurate, but they believe i t Is an accurate concept of how watee is
flowing In that area.
Mr. Wood - reviewed the reasons Jlsted by the DNR for approving the
requested permit, and questioned some of the comments, especially the
large influx on the lake due to evaporation at the rate of 17,000
gaJlons per minute tram an 60-acee lake. He asked if it is possible
to dlstlnquish the pumping tram the natural occurrences. Dr. Leete
stated they know the water from the lake tlows toward Coon Creek. It
Is hard to take the computer model and get absolute numbers, but they
cannot explain the total fluctuation of Round Lake through pumping.
The rate of evaporation depends on the variables at temperature, wind,
shallowness at the lake,
Mr. Wood - felt it should be possible to predict what is actually
happening to the lake and suggested more controlled testing be done
while monitoring the levels of the lake. They want to know how to get
the water back into the lake. Dr. Leete noted that budget and staff
cutbacks prevent them tram doing mace extensive testing. The
difference between the lake recovering and when Mr. Slyzuk/s fields
are dry enough to work makes her think there is a lag between the
water reaching the lake and the fields, which Is a paeadox.
Peter Rauen. 4110 147th Lane - stated when this was discussed Jast
year, the residents weee told they would have a chance to look at the
test p]ans and have them checked with another expert on salls in Anoka
County before actually peetormlng those tests. That was nevee
I
Regular City CounciJ Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 7
(DNR Permit Request/Slyzuk, Continued)
followed through, and they did not have an opportunity to look at the
plans to see what they were p]anning. Eveeythlng they heaed tonight
demonstrates there is a hYdrologic connection and a whole section at
the lake Is tlowing out of the southeast side and is made much woese
because of the ditch system there. They would argue that untiJ the
DNR can show there Is no definite impact on Round Lake that the pump
is taking water out of Round Lake. They are questioning how much.
Winslow Holasek - stated the testimony was it Is the creek itselt
tha t affects the lake, not the ditch system. Dr. Leete stated the
ground water system uses the creek as the dischaege point, that that
is the genera] picture of how the ground water flows.
Me. Holasek - asked if the lake level wouJd be affected if Coon
Creek were cleaned and lowered two feet. Dr. Leete inclIned to think
it would. She wasn't sure, but thought the cleaning of the ditch would
have a tar greater impact on the lake than the pumping wi I I have.
Paul Welu. 14865 Blackfoot Street NW - asked where the Jevel of
Round Lake sets since the DNR has been keeping track at the various
lakes. He noticed that Lake George looked like It came back more.
Mr. Hovey stated he does not have all that information, but Round Lake
has recoveeed the same as Coon Lake. Lake George has a difterent
basin.
Mr. 21 I Ihardt - persisted in his curiosity at the pumping taking
place at the same time the lake level went way down and the watee
rising when the pumping stopped. Mr. Hovey stated the connection
between the pumping and the lake level Isn't that great.
Mr. Slvzuk - stated In talking with "old timers", they report that
there have been yeaes when there has been no water In the lake and
they hay on it. Also, there have been springs where the lake level is
way down unt I] the frost goes out because the frost pushes the muck
up wi th the water eemalnlng underneath. As the frost goes out, the
watee comes back. When it Is the driest, he is not pumping the dItch.
In 1988 groundwater went way down, so there was nothing to eecharge
it in the spring of 1989.
Counc i I discussion continued on the permit request. Though the DNR
felt the pumping will cause no appreciable effect to the lake level,
they sensed the residents stil I had some concerns. They agreed to
recommend the permit be geanted for a three-year period, during which
time the DNR can monitor the situation more closely. They hoped the
lake levels and the pumping would be gauged so that they wouJd be able
to pick up any unusuaJ occurrences. Councllmembers McKeJvey and Perry
telt an annual review would be a good Idea.
It was ageeed the Minutes of this meeting wi I I be provided to the DNR
as the City and resident comments on the permit application.
I
Regular City Counci1 Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 8
Counc i I recessed at 9:16; reconvened at 9:24 p.m.
VARIANCE/RUNKE
Chaleperson Feeris reviewed the eecommendation of the P & Z to deny
the variance request of James and Margaret Runke, 13476 Hanson
Boulevard NW to retain certain structures which do not meet ordinance
requirements. No building permits were appJled for. The Customer
Secueity Buildings are on the rear property line violating the 10-foot
setback requirement per Ordinance 8, Section 4.05 (E). Those
bui Jdings, as well as the Brake Leigh lean-to agaInst the original
Andover WheeJ and Frame buIldIng, do not meet the sIdIng requIrements
for commerclaJ buildings per Ordinance 78. The business is expanding;
and during the building permit procedure, the illegal structures were
discovered. The Commission found no eeason to grant the variance.
Councl1member McKelvey stated he viewed the site. He's known the
structures have been theee for at least three years. Me. Runke told
him they were put up tlve years ago and he didn't know a permit was
needed tor those structures. The map shows there is theee teet behind
the Customer Security Buildings and the peoperty line. Behind that
building is nothing but a pile at sand and the power easement, which
is not usable. The siding on the structures matches what Is on the
original commercia] building. The Brake Leigh lean-to Is attached to
the back at the building and the Customer Security Buildings, which
are used to protect cars from the weather, are in the back along the
fence line. None are visible feom the street.
Chairperson Ferris stated the three-foot setback in the reae is new.
The Planning Commission was under the Impression that the tence and
buildings were abutting the property Jine with no setback. David
Almgren, Building Official, provided the background at how he became
aware of the structures when inspecting the premises tor the expansion
of the original bull ding.
In discussing the oedinance violations, it was noted that to bring the
structures into compliance, the siding material on the Brake Leigh
lean-to would need to be changed, and the Customer Security Buildings
would need to be 10 feet from the rear property line and resided with
acceptable material. BulJding permits couJd be given if all
requirements are met. Theee Is no variance provision in Ordinance 78.
James Runke - stated they did make contact with the Bui lding
Ofticia] several times regarding this matter, though they did not put
anything in welting. He did not know what to do about the situation
or what his alteenatives were. He was teylng to figure out a way to
compJy with the oedlnance and still retain the structuees. At the
hearIng it was brought up that the procedure was to get an after-the-
fact permit and pay doubJe the cost at the permit. Mr. AJmgren stated
that Is the proceduee, though he does not geneeally chaege residents
the extea fee because he tries to help them out.
I -. ---.
Regular City Council Meet! ng
Minutes - Maech 19, 1991
Page 9
(Vaeiance/Runke, Continued)
Mr. Runke - stated at the time the structures were put up, they did
comply wIth the siding requirements. He could take otf the back seven
or ten feet off the Customer Servicing Buildings to meet the setback
requirement. Mr. Almgren stated the structures would have to meet the
structueal requir-ements. He said he talked with the Runkes about
bringing the structures up to code, but he dIdn't realize they did not
have doors in the front. The need for those doors Is a matter at
acceptance by the Andover Review Committee. It the ARC does not
accept the structures without door-s, the Runkes can appeal it to the
Counci I.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Smith, a Resolution denying the
variance request of James and Margaeet Runke d/b/a Andover WheeJ &
Frame at 13476 NW Hanson Boulevard as presented with the fol Jawing
change In the next to the last paragraph: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the applicant can bring the lean-to on the back of the orlginaJ
building and the three-sided shed in the eear area up to code within
30 days... (See Resolution R030-91) DISCUSSION: Counc i I member
McKelvey raised the Issue of not issuing the Cer-tificate at Occupancy
for the addition to the business because of this matter-. Mr. Almgren
stated his records show the Certitlcate of Occupancy was mailed to the
Runkes on September 6, 1990. Motion car-ried unanimously.
ORDINANCE 8. SECTION 8.08 DISCUSSION/CURBING
The Counci I discussed the ordInance r-equirement of requiring alJ
driveways. loading areas and storage areas to be bounded by concrete
curb and gutter and the Planning Commission's recommendation to leave
the ordinance as written and grant variances as an economic cour-tesy
to other governmental agencies.
Mayor Orttel had a problem with the requirement, thinking the time was
not taken to eevlew all scenarios when that requir-ement was approved.
He felt that it Is an unnecessary expense In such cases the lengthy
access to Kelsey/Round Lake Park, or packing lots In the City par-ks,
or church packing lots, etc. He teJt that high-use Industrial and
commercial areas eequlre the use of concrete curb and gutter; however,
areas which are low use should only eequire it when necessary to
controJ traffic oe drainage. He peesented a written proposal to amend
the ordinance to that effect, feeling ther-e should be a provision in
the ordinance for low-use public aeeas.
Discussion was on what wouJd constitute high and Jaw use of a public
parking aeea. The Mayor felt that a church parking lot would be Jaw
use because it is only used several times a week, but a school would
be high use. The Mosquito Control District aeea, for example, Is a
large public area with only employees using the facilities. It is an
unnecessaey expense to put concrete curb and gutter around the entice
area.
I
ReguJar City Council Meet I ng
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 10
(Ordinance 8, Section 8.08 Discussion/Curbing, Continued)
Councilmember Jacobson thought the distinction could be difflcult to
make without clear-cut criteria set torth. Because he may have a
confl ict of Interest on this issue, he stated he will not be voting on
it.
Councilmember Perry teJt it doesn't make sense to require concrete
curb and gutter- in areas where it is not needed. In these economic
times, i t Is not prudent tor governmentaJ bodies to eequire
expenditures that are not absoluteJy necessary. Councilmembee Smith
concurred. Mayor Orttel also noted that this Is a financial Issue
that geeatly Impacts Andover as well as other governmentaJ and prIvate
agencies.
Because it was felt the opinions of the PJanning Commissions are
clear, it was ageeed the Council will hold the public hearing and
welcome comment and input from the Commissioners.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by McKelvey, that we advertise for a
public heaeing tor revision to Ordinance 8 as It pertains to the
concrete curb and guttee eequlrements of Section 8,08 (E) (9) : and
that in addition to our- usua I public notiticatlon that we also send a
copy of the Minutes of tonight's meeting that pertain to I t and a copy
of the notitication to the Planning and Zoning Commission members and
request if they have specific concerns that they contact one of the
Councllmembers or attend the meeting with their concerns. Motion
carried unanimously. The hear-ing will be held on April 2, 1991.
RESPONSE TO METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL
Mayor Orttel asked for authoeization to send a Jetter to the MWCC
coreectlng their tigures in the Wastewater- Tr-eatment and HandJing
Implementation Plan years 1991-2010, Appendl x "C" Andover.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith, to so move. Motion carried
unanimousJy.
COON CREEK WATERSHED APPOINTMENT
Mayor Orttel exp]ained Commissioner Burke has asked that the City
subm i t three names to be considered for- appointment to the Coon Creek
Wateeshed Board.
MOTION by Sml th, Seconded by Perry, that Don Jacobson and Todd Smith
be ranked second and thir-d as selections for the Wateeshed Boaed, and
that Bob Boyum remaIn the number one choIce of the City to represent
the City on that Board. Motion carried unanimously.
I
Regulae City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 11
EQUESTRIAN COUNCIL APPLICANTS
It was agreed to reappoint Don Eveland to a two-year term on the
Equesteian Council and ask tor a eecommendatlon feom the Equestrian
Counci] foe the other members after they have Interviewed them.
MOTION by McKelvey, Seconded by Smith, to so move. DISCUSSION: A
suggestion was that the appointments to this Council be made the tirst
of the yeae along with the other CommIssions. The Council also
requested the Equestrian Council look at the length of terms of the
various members to be sure they comply with the ordinance. Motion
careled unanimously.
PURCHASE SEWER AND WTERMAIN LOCATOR/GAS DETECTOR
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith. that the Council authoeize
the purchase at a 850 Buried Utility Line Teacer In the amount of
$2,700: funds to come out at the 1991 Water Distribution Budget: and
authorize purchase of a Neotronics Exotox 3-Way Gas Monitor in the
amount of $1,800 with the money to come out of the Sanitary Sewer
Budget for 1991. Motion carried unanimously.
APPOVE SOLID WASTE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
Cindy DeRuyter, Recycling Coordinator, stated the Joint Powers
Agreement Is the same as last time. In her conversations with the
county, their funding of the program should contInue. Council noted
the termination clause In the event the City wishes to cancel the
agreement because of lack of funding.
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by Percy, that we accept the Joint Powers
Agreement as written. Motion carried unanimously.
APPROVE GOODWILL INDUSTRIES AGREEMENT
Council noted the monthly cost If eveeything was calculated on the
q
additional pickup charge Is cheapee than toe the scheduled ones. Ms.
DeRuytee stated she wll] discuss this with Goodwill. Mayor Orttel
asked tor a motion to appeove the ageeement subject to Ms. DeRuyter
checking out the charges foe any further cost savings.
MOTION by McKelvey, Seconded by Smith, to so move. Motion carried
unanimously.
Regular City Counci] Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 12
AMEND FIRE TRUCK BIDS
Fire Chief Glenn Smith and Captain Bob Peach reviewed the proposed
changes to the new tire trucks and the cost changes. The net change
tor all trucks comes to an additional cost of $942. Captain Peach
explained these are just pre-construction changes which will eesult In
much better trucks, though they wouJd not have made a difterence in
the oeiginal bids eecelved.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith, that we approve the amended
fire truck bids as listed on oue Item 14 set toe Tuesday. March 19,
1991. Motion carried unanimousJy. Attoeney Hawkins advised the
approval ImplIes authorIzatIon for the Mayor and Clerk to sign the
revised contracts.
AWARD BID/FIRE STATIONS/IP90-26
Tom Anderson. BRA - eevlewed the bids received for the two fire
stations. Alternate 2 having to do with the exterior of the building
was deleted. The Jaw bid of Maertens-Beenney Construction Company Is
be10w the project budget and Includes Alternates 3 and 7.
Severin Brennv. Maertens-Beennv Construction - stated the firm is
based in Fridley, but he lives In Andover.
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by Jacobson, the Resolution accepting bids
and awarding contract for Fire Stations #1 and #2, IP90-26, award
contract to Maertens-Brenny Construction Company foe $1,037,391. (See
Resolution R031-91) DISCUSSION: Attorney Hawkins estimated the City
wi I J have access to the propeety tor Station #2 In one or two weeks,
as soon as the award is made and the City has made a payment at
four-fifths of the awaed.
Me. Brennv - expected to begin construction as soon as the feast is
out at the ground. They expect completion of Station #1 by October 1
and hoped to get into the second station about that same time. He also
expected the completion time of Station #2 would be extended If theee
is a problem gaining access to that parcel.
Motion carried unanimnously.
ORDER AD FOR BIDS/AIR PACKS/FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Chief Glenn Smith requested approval of the specifications and to
order the ad foe bids tor the self-contained breathing apparatus.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith, that we authorize going out
for bids on the air packs bids that we were presented tonight, bids to
be published on March 29 and opened on April 23. Motion carried
unanimously.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 13
APPROVE REVISED BY-LAWS/FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION
Firefighter Tom May reviewed the revised By-Laws of the Firefighters
Relief Assoc., pointing out an increase of $100 per member as the
City's contribution to the pensIon plan. That was budgeted for in
1991 and Is the first change in the City's share since 1980.
Page 2, Section 4: Mr. May stated the change Includes an approval at
the Counc II on the Investment of the tunds at the Relief Association.
Both the Clerk and the Mayor are trustees of the Association.
Page 11: Chief SmIth explained a fIrefighter Is not fu II y vested
unt II 20 years of service. Between tive and 20 years, the pension
amount Is based on a pro rata basIs of seevIce.
Page 15: Mr. May stated the City carries term life insurance on a II
active and peobatIonaey membees, and this was spe~itlcal Iy pJaced In
the By-Laws as a protection to the flretlghtees, especially those who
have been In service toe less than tive years. Mr. Koollck aegued the
By-Laws are foe the Relief Assoc., but this applies to al I members of
the Fire Department, which may not be the same persons in both cases.
He did not feel this was the approprIate place, suggesting It be
placed in the Fiee Department By-Laws Instead. Mr. May felt I t Is an
important point and was reluctant to it being removed. Counc i I agreed
the Item should be directed to the City Attoeney for his opinion.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, adopt the Resolution adopting
the By-Laws of the Andover Firefighters Relief Association, Inc. ,
Revision IIC" , as presented with the caveat that It must be reviewed by
the City Attoeney as to their form and legality, with a special note
f rom the Counc II on Page 15, Section 5, which deals with the term life
insurance, to get his opinion on the legality or how that may be
addressed in the proper fashIon. (See Resolution R032-91) Mati on
carried unanimously.
ASSESSMENT ABATEMENT. CONTINUED
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Smith, to move that abatement of the
special assessments on PIN 13 32 25 21 0023. Motion carried
unanimously. Counc I J requested the issue of possibly assessing the
othee parcel involved be added to the Agenda In the neae tutuee.
DARE CONTRIBUTION
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, that the City Council decline
to enter Into the DARE progeam with the Anoka Police Department In the
amout eequested, and authorize the Mayoe to sign a lettee to that
effect. DISCUSS ION : Though the excellence ot the program was
eecognlzed, because of the budget cutbacks, the Counc I ] did not fee]
the City could afford the expense at thIs time. Mr. Koollck stated he
would research whether CDBG funds could be used for the program.
Counc i I suggested contacting other service organizations for funds.
Motion carried unanimously.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 14
APROVE STORM SEWER BASE MAPS
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by McKelvey, that we approve the storm
sewer base maps. Motion carried unanimously.
ACCEPT OLD CONSTANCE BOULEVARD
MOTION by Peery, Seconded by Smith, the Resolution accepting the old
part of Constance Boulevaed from 800 feet east of GoJdeneod Street to
University Avenue in Section 13, Township 32, Range 24, as prepaeed.
(See ResoJutlon R033-91) Motion carried unanimously.
RENAME CONSTANCE BOULEVARD
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, an oedlnance changing the
name at the old part of Constance Boulevard to Old Constance
Boulevard. Motion carried unanimously.
ASSESSMENT POLICY
Council noted the Assessment P011cy manual Includes everything agreed
to to date except the eural assessment policy, which has been
excluded.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith, a Resolution approving the
Assessment Manual Policy and Procedure Guide. (See Resolution
R034-91) Motion carried unanimously.
NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS
IP91-1/Crosstown Drive - Council felt the road width should be 32 teet
but thought the sidewalks should be on the east side, which Is where
the foot and bicycle traffic is now. It was suggested the cost at the
sidewalk be separated tor the public heaelng.
IP90-12/Sidewa1ks for Bent Creek Estates - Mr. Schçantz noted the cost
Is not eligible for State MSA, so the funds will be coming from the
City's MSA fund.
IP91-2/Creekview Crossing Petition - Council noted the petition does
not say anything about sewer and water, asking that that be clarltied.
Regular City Council Meetl ng
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 15
(Non-Discussion Items, Continued)
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by McKelvey, to accept the Non-Discussion
Items as presented and discussed. (See the following:
Resolution R035-91 - Accepting bids and awarding contract, IP90-12
and 90-13, sidewalk for Bent Creek Estates and
Creekrldge Estates, awarded to W. B. Miller
foe $30,536
Resolution R036-91 - ApprovIng tinal plans and specs and order ad
for bids, IP 90-25, Metropolitan Mosquito
Conteol Distelct wateemaln
Resolution R037-91 - Declaee adequcy of petition and order
preparation at feasibility report, IP 91-2,
Creekvlew Crossing
Resolution R038-91 - Receive teasiblllty and set public heaeing,
IP91-1, Crosstown Deive, hearing to be on
Apr II 16, 1991
Receive Februaey Financial Statements for General, Water and Sewee
Funds)
Motion carried unanimously.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL INPUT
Andovee Express Newsletter - The Council wished to make It very clear
that only the specific section with the Andover news Is the official
newsletter, that the remainder of the paper does not represent the
City. It was agreed that theee is to be no mention of "Andover
Otficia] Newsletter" on the front page, and the Insert to be clearJy
marked tha t it is the official City of Andover newsletter.
Plaque for Fire Station - Councilmember Jacobson personally didn't
feel comfortable with his name on a plaque Just because he is a
Counc II member. Because it Is traditionally done In public buildings,
the Counc i I generally agreed with the plaque as proposed.
Oak Grove DemoJitlon Disposal Site - The Staff was directed to send a
letter to the Oak Grove Town Baaed expressing Andover's concern over
the proposed demolition disposal site in Oak Grove because of its
close proximity to the Rum River and what happens downstream in
Andover, its effect on property values, and the effect on trattic
through Andover. Councilmembee Perry noted the public heaeing is
Thursday, Maech 21.
Sanitary Sewee and Water Bil]ings - Mr. Kool ick Intormed the Council
that the Information wi I I not be enter into the new utilities program
In time for the April bill ing. Because of that, the biJ]lng will be
at least three weeks late. The next billing should be on time.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - March 19, 1991
Page 16
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
MOTION by Smi th, Seconded by Jacobson, approva1 of the Claims
as presented tor $146,247.58. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Smith, to adjourn. Motion carried
unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 11:55 p.m.
RespectfuIly sUbmltted~
"-~~~
Marcella A. Peach
Recording Secretary
- ·0__