Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC May 1, 1990 -- ~\ CITY of ANDOVER .L. . Regular city Council Meeting May 1, 1990 7:30 P.M. Call to Order Resident Forum Agenda Approval Approval of Minutes Discussion Items 1. Ordinance 62 Amendment (Hunting) 2. Ed Fields Lot split 3. Assessment Abatement/86-19 4. Approve Quotes: Altitude ValvejWater System 5. Staff, Committee, Commission 6. Park Dedication Requirements, Cont. 7. Park User Fee 8. City Hall Tennis Courts 9. SAC Rebates, Cont. 10. Sidewalks/Creekridge; Bent Creek; MSA, Cont. 11. Public Works Capital Equipment, Cont. 12. Gopher State One Call Computer, Cont. 13. Discussion: Unpaid Developer Assessments 14. Approve Financial projection/Fire Dept. Bond 15. Approve Lease/AAA Building Non-Discussion Items 16. Order ROW Plans/University & 165th Ave. 17. Approve speed Limit Authorizations/Stenquist- 159th Ave. Area 18. Approve Grading, Release Escrow/Red Oaks 6th 19. Receive Feasibility Report/90-6 20. Accept Outlots/Hidden Creek 2nd & 3rd Additions 21. Approve rIse Resolution 22. Approve Resolution/Fire Dept. Bond Election Approval of Claims Adjourn ~ -- . - -. ~- -- ~ - - "., ", 'CA ' ", CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - MAY 1, 1990 ""c_ ~1INUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jim E]I Ing on May 1 . 1990. 7:30 p.m.. at at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Councilmembers present: Jacobson, Knight. Orttel, Perry Councilmembers absent: None Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins: TKDA Engineers, John Davidson and Rick Odland: Assistant City Engineer. Todd Haas: CI ty Planner, Jay Blake: City Finance Director. Holward Koollck; Planning and Zoning Commission Chairperson. Rebecca Pease; Publ ic Works Supervisor, Frank Stone: Ci ty Administrator, James Schrantz: others RESIDENT FORUM ROGer Sharon. Andover AthJetlc Association - stated the building at the CI ty Hall Complex is already up and they are starting to finish the interior. He asked if the City Is going to put power out to the bul lding, recal ling there was some discussion about starting to light some of the fields. Mr. Stone stated he is waiting for the bids from Anoka Electric to run eJectriclty to the building. He did not know how much it would cost. EJectricians have told him the City Hajj bui] ding is loaded to capacity. so a separate J ine wll] need to be run out there. He also noted there are no funds budgeted for electricity unless It comes from park dedication fees. After further discussion, It was agreed to wait to make a decision until the May 15Counci1 meeting when the costs should be known. AGENDA APPROVAL It was suggested the fol lowing items be added to the Agenda: Item 5, Northwest Steel Fabricators. Inc. , Purchase Agreement: Item 23. Set Work Session; Item 23a, LegisJatlve Changes of LGA: and Item 23b, Discussion on AduJt Bookstores. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, approve the Agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Aprl I 12 and 17. 1990: Correct as written. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Perry. approval of the Apri I 12 Minutes. Motion carried on a 4-Yes. i-Present (Elling) vote. - -.' -- . .-, Regular CI ty Counci I Meetl ng Minutes - May 1 , 1990 Page 2 (Approval of Minutes, Continued) MOT! 01< by Kn i gh t , Seconded by Perry, approval of the Apr I I 17 Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINAr¡CE 62 AMENDMEI<T (HUI<TING) Counci J generalIy agreed to redefining the prohibited hunting area wi thin the City: however, several concerns over language in the ordinance were discussed. The fol lowing changes were agreed to: Section I . b. SHOTGUN - Change ". ..except when using a sing1e slug." to ".. .including when using a single slug." It was agreed the intent of the ordinance was not to outlaw deer hunting In the City. The proposed change is to cJarify that hunting deer would be possible. Section I , b. FIREARMS - There was concern over conflicting regu J at ions in Section I I under Items a) and b) 4. Council was also concerned about including BB guns in the definition, not wanting to be overJy restrictive. It was felt that the more powerful BB guns are actually classified as pel let weapons or C02 powered, which is IncJuded In the definition. Attorney Hawkins recommended deJetlng rifles and handguns from the definition of firearms for greater clarity. He suggested the definition of Firearms be changed to: II far the purpose of this ordinance this shal I mean shotguns and pel let weapons, whether C02 or pneumatic powered." Counc I 1 agreed. Section II. a) - It was agreed to change the word firearm to shotgun, feel ing that is the intent of the regulation. The ordinance Is to read: "No person shal I discharge a shotgun or bow and arrow within 500 feet of any residence. " Section II, b) 4) - Councllmember Knight was concerned about not al lowing bow and arrow target practice unless It Is on ten acres or more. As a bow and arrow hunter, he knows the projectile is rarely over 30 yards. He has never heard of anyone in the State of Minnesota being inJured or kll led by a bow and arrow unless I t is a self-Injury. not seeing a danger there. If a person cannot shoot a bow and arrow for target practice on 2 1/2 acres, he felt I t Is overly restrictive. Councilmember Orttel was also concerned about this section because most of the recreational target shooting is of clay pigeons, and that cannot have a backstop as required by this section. Several Ideas were discussed such as adding "...backstop and-'or other proper precautions..." so shooting pigeons would be allowed, or including a phrase that would not allow the projectlJe to leave the owner's property, or deleting the entire provision in recreational target shooting. Another suggestion was to have separate paragraphs for firearms and bows and arrows, with bows and arrows being alJowed wi thin 100 feet of any residence (Section I I a) and on something less than 10 acres of Jand (Section II b) 3) . . - -- - Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - May 1 . 1990 Page 3 (Ordinance 62 Amendment (Hunting), Continued) SectIon II b) 5) - Changed to read: "The discharge of a rifJe or handgun utilizing a sol id projectile shal J not be al lowed within the City of Andover." Secti on I I d) - Changed to read: "The provisions of this ordinance shal J not app]y to the discharge of firearms, rifles, or handguns when done in the lawful defense of persons or property. No part of this ordinance Is Intended to abridge the constitutional right to keep and bear arms." The Staff was directed to redraft the ordinance with the changes agreed to this evening to clarify the Intent and wi th lesser restrictions on the use of bow and arrows. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, that we refer this back to Staff for fine tuning. Motion carried unanimously. ED FIELDS LOT SPLIT Mayor El I ing read a letter into the record from Ed Fields stating he could not be in attendance this evening. that he would not I ike to see Uplander Street improved at this time because of the problems with four-wheeJers, motorized bikes, etc. . but that he had no objection to granting an easement through there. Chairperson Pease reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission and suggestions made to Mr. Fields on possible ways to split the lot. Mr. Fields has asked that his proposal be presented to the CounciI. which is to spilt a 2.5-acre lot from a 28.61-acre parcel to give to one of his grandchildren. The property was assessed about $3,000 for the street improvement of Uplander. Because i t is off the end of the cui de sac, It does not meet the required frontage by 200 feet. And because it Is a lot sp I It. the easement is excluded from determining area, so the proposed lot Is Jess than 2.5 acres. The PJanning Commission found no hardship; the motion to approve the lot sp II t fall ed. There was a lengthy discussion on various ways the lot couJd be divided. the advantages and drawbacks of each of them. Mr. Blake stated Mr. FieJds has agreed to combine the southern lot which is presently Jandlocked (No. 4 on the plat map) with his farm property. Mayor EI ling was not so concerned about the lots at the cu] de sac as long as there was an easement along the property lines to be abJe to extend Uplander at a future date. CounciJmember Jacobson noted a variance cannot be granted because there is no hardship. He was concerned that this split would require such large variances for frontage and area. .-- -. Regular City Councl] Meeting Minutes - May 1 , 1990 Page 4 (Ed Fields Lot Split, Continued) Councllmember Orttel argued that easement is included when determining the area In other instances: but It is not included In this case because it is a lot sp lit. That penalizes the property owner In this case. To meet the frontage requirement. he thought Mr. Fields could grant additional easement beyond the cui de sac. MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Perry, that in the appl ication for a Iot split by Ed Fields at 158 NW UpIander Street, that request be denied for the fol lowing reasons: Pursuant to Ordinance 8, Section 5.04 and Ordinance 10, Section 16.02. hardship Is not shown; there is more than adequate land adjacent to the parcel to provide the needed acreage; and i t wou 1 d be landlocking an existing 2 1/2-acre parcel to the south: it would be contrary to the ordinance requirement of 300 feet of frontage pursuant to Ordinance No. 8, Section 6.02 and Ordinance No. 10, Section 16.02. DISCUSSION: Councllmember Knight noted If Mr. Fields agrees to combine the landlocked parceJ wi th his farm. that would not be an Issue. Councllmember Ortte] stated in the past the Counc i 1 has had to make some concessions to make things fit. It Mr. Fields would spilt Into five acres. or if the lot had been split off as one acre ten years ago, or I f he comes In for a building permit on the entire 28 acres, the City could not object. He asked what is the net difference to the City whether he does any of those things or comes In with a request for 2 1/2 acres. He thought the fault is with the ordinance. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, NO-EI ling, Kn I gh t , Ortte I, Perry Motion fall ed. MOTION by Knight. Seconded by Orttel, to continue this Item. DISCUSSION: Mayor EI ling stated he would talk with Mr. FieJds regarding options to increasing the acreage and frontage. Councilmember Perry stated she would I ike to see Mr. FieJds provide written agreement to combine the southern landJocked parcel to the farm. Rea I i zing the lot would be less than the required area, she felt it would make more sense to square-off the proposed lot to have three lots that are simillar in size which act as a buffer between the more dense population and the agricuJtural area, She di d not like to change lot lines simply to achieve a certain dimension. Motion carried unanimously. ASSESSMENT ABATEMENT/86-19 Mr. Schrantz stated In reviewing the assessable area on RoseJla Sonsteby's property for Project 86-19. It was determined it should be reduced to 636,000 square feet. The other Items raised by Ms. Sonsteby were dealt with in the 1 igi tatJon. so he did not discuss them further with her. ,. ,,- -- -- Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - May 1 . 1990 Page 5 (Assessment Abatement/86-19. Continued) Mr. Davidson agreed that the assessment should be reduced by $6.000 because of an error in calculating the assessable acreage. There were two ridge lines south of Seventh Avenue. They Initially used the line farthest west and are now conceding the land between is wet. Attorney Hawkins explained It Is not Ms. Sonsteby's posItion to accept or reject the reduced assessment. If the Counc II feels there was an error, a supplemental hearing pursuant to the Statute should be heId to correct the ro II . A mailed notice must be given as was done for the original assessment. Council noted the 429 procedure with notification must be gone through since Ms. Sonsteby disagrees with the amount of the reduction. Attorney Hawkins also advised If Ms. Sonsteby Is dlssatlsf led. she has the right to appeaI the determination of the lower assessment only; those Issues already litigated cannot be reopened. The court has already determined that this Is a vaJid assessment. MOTION by Knight. Seconded by Jacobson, that we set the hearing for the first meeting In June (June 5, 1990) (See Resolution R051-90) Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE QUOTES: ALTITUDE VALVE/WATER SYSTEM Mr. Davdlson stated they are asking for approval to go out for quotes for an altitude valve for the water system. This would al low the water system to be operated at a higher pressure off the new tower. then phase In Tower #1 for Iower pressure periods and for fire and sprinkling demands. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, to so move. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE GRADING. RELEASE ESCROW/RED OAKS 6TH Mr. Haas stated three of the manhoIe covers have been covered with dirt along Bunker Lake BouIevard. Mr. Davidson stated the Staff has asked the developer to put a two-foot section in the manhole to raise it up. Mayor EI ling asked to table the Item until I t is resolved. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to continue this to the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/90-6 Mr. Schrantz expJained there Is a petition to serve the Haluptzok property only. The water and sewer I Ines have the capacity to serve Haluptzok's lot plus three other existing lots belonging to Batson. _e, Regular City Council Meeti ng Minutes - May 1 , 1990 Page 6 (Receive Feasibility Report/90-6, Continued) He recommended ordering the hearing for al I four parcels recognizing the Counc II has the authority to reduce the size of the project at the hearing. Mr. Davidson reviewed the ultimate service area aIong Bunker Lake Boulevard for this proposed line. In theory, there wouJd be two developable Jots east and two west of the crossing. Counc I I was concerned about the assessments not covering the expenses. Mr. Schrantz noted the cost of taking the line across the road comes from the Trunk, Source, and Storage fund. Mr. Davidson noted that u I tI ma tel y the City's share for the entire system would be $12,700. It is also possible to extend the line further south to serve some interior development. Counc II agreed that the public hearing should be ca II ed to include the four lots that would potentially be served by the crossing. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, based upon the Engineer's feaslblIity report on Project 90-6 that the the appropriate pubJic hearing notices be posted and the pUblic hearing be heJd as soon as possible, with the notation that we specifically make sure that Mr. Haluptzok and Mr. Batson are both notified as to the hearing so that they can both be here: also approve the feasibility report. (Hearing to be held May 15, 1990) (See Resolution R052-90) Motion carried unanimously. NORTHWEST STEEL FABRICATORS PURCHASE AGREEMENT Mr. Blake called attention to a purchase agreement from Northwest Steel Fabricators, Inc. , to purchase Lots 2 and 3 of Block 3 In the Commercial Park. The firm, presently located In Ramsey, has 17 empJoyees and Is looking to expand to 35. They are also asking that the City cover and pipe the drainage ditch between the two lots so they can both be used for buiJding, parking lot and storage. Mr. Blake estimated that cost to be $14,000. He also noted the offer amounts to 50.1 cents/square foot, which is less than the 65 cents the City has been requesting. He asked for direction from the Council. After discussion, Counc I I agreed to authorize the Attorney and Mr. Blake to negotiate with the firm. Also, this should be brought before the Economic Development Committee, and the firm should submit sketches of the proposed project. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, that we refer this to the Economic Development Committee. Motion carried unanimously. It was agreed the item should be placed on the May 15 Agenda to consider the EDC's recommendations. , . ..- -- -.._-,. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - May 1 , 1990 Page 7 SAC REBATES. CONTINUED Kevin Fish. 835 146th Lane NW - asked If they wi I I be paid interest on the SAC rebates. He thought the City had deposited those charges in the bank and that the residents are entitled to that interest on their money as welJ. Counc I I reviewed the City's position of not forwarding SAC charges to the MWCC co I lected from areas that either would not be served for many years or would never be served by sanitary sewer. But because those charges collected were never put in a separate fund, there Is no way to determine how much interest was made: and any Interest made was pooJed and used in the General Fund. Mr. Koolick explained the City started withholding the payment of SAC charges to the MWCC In 1977. From all he could find out, prior to that time those charges were forwarded to MWCC: however, MWCC feels they do not have them. He felt the only way this Issue wi II be resoIved is to have an audit done. which will take time. He wi J I pursue that further. Another problem is the time period in which to receive refunds from the MWCC has expired. so it may be difficult for the City to recover the money forwarded from 1973 to 1977. Mr. Fish - asked when sewer would be avaiJable to his property. Counc i I stated there are no plans for sanitary sewer in his area. They also expJained he has the option of Jetting the City keep the SAC charge he paid In, so when sewer does become available, the City would pay MWCC. The amount paid then would be more than what Mr. Fish paid because the charge is adjusted every year. Mr. KooIlck stated the checks to be approved this evening are refunds paid after 1977 . The City does not have enough funds to cover those charges from 1973 to 1977 that were forwarded to the MWCC. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, that we authorize the payment of SAC refund based upon the financial report shown on 5-1-90 in the amount of $35,375. Motion carried unanImously. Mr. Kool ick asked for direction regarding those property owners who did not respond as to whether or not they want the refund. Council directed Mr. KooJ ick to send a second notice with a deadline. and also to write to those involved in the 1973 to 1977 time frame that the matter Is st 111 being Investigated. LEGISLATIVE CHANGES/LGA Mr. KooJich noted the changes made by the State Legislature wiJ I reduce this year's revenue to the City by approximateIy $22,000. He reviewed several options to balancing the budget. Counc i 1 agreed to do nothing at this time, and to analyze it again cJoser to the end of the year. .~ -- -- Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - May 1 , 1990 Page 8 Counc i I recessed at 9:42: reconvened at 9:50. PARK DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS Park and Recreation Commission Chairman Jeff Kieffer stated they are recommending no change to the park dedication requirements. He also reviewed the May 1 . 1990, memo from Mr. Haas regarding the park dedication paid since the ordinance has been in effect, noting it varies considerably depending on where the property is located. Counc I I noted the concern is on the smal 1 lot splits where the owner actually pays more than 10 percent in park fees because of the cost of hiring an appraiser. DIscussion with those present was on the procedure being used now and pros and cons of using other procedures. Staff also pointed out that some farmers off Round Lake Boulevard are in the process of rearranging property lines, some of the property being In Ag Preserve: and the ordinance requires park dedication to be collected on It. Council questioned if park dedication shouJd be taken at this time because there wi J I be no increased use of the land and no houses will be bu i 1 t . Attorney Hawkins advised the ordinance Is clear that park dedication must be taken: however, the City can change the ordinance with a provision regarding splits and rearranging of property lines of non-buiJdable property. Councilmember Orttel argued the ordinance should be changed, that park dedication should not be taken for land used for agriculture. Mayor El ling suggested the Park Board be directed to look Into that matter and come back with a recommendation at the next meeting. He also suggested the Park Board look at not collecting fees on lot splits and metes and bounds splits of over ten acres. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to so move. Motion carried unanimously. PARK USER FEE MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, that all Park User Fees be returned to the Park Budget. DISCUSSION: Me. Koolick summarized the mot i on to be the Park User Fees be placed In Playing Field Maintenance and Park Maintenance Fund to be used for the replacement and repairs of the fieJds. Motion carried unanimously. CITY HALL TENNIS COURTS MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Perry. that the Counc i I authorize the Park Commission to expend the funds from their park dedication fees for the resurfacing, resealing. and repair of the CI ty Hall tennis court not to exceed $3,750. Motion carried unanimously. -- Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - May 1 , 1990 Page 9 SIDEWALKS/CREEKRIDGE: BENT CREEK: MSA Mr. Haas stated to meet State Aid requirements. they have to go through the same process at any MSA street construction. Me. Schrantz stated a feasibility report Is not necessary i f there wi II be no assessment. The current poJlcy states sldewaJks are not assessed on MSA streets. Council agreed the policy should be discussed when the assessment manual Is updated. These projects wi I I not be assessed. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, to direct Staff to prepare resolutions ordering plans and specifications for sidewalks for Projects 90-12 and 90-13 with the work to be completed by BRA. (See Resolutions R053-90, IP90-12, and R054-90, IP90-13) Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE SPEED LIMIT AUTHORI2ATIONS/STENQUIST-159TH AVENUE AREA MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel. the speed limit proposal presented here for Stenquist Addition. (See Resolution R055-90) Motion carried unanimously. ACCEPT OUTLOTS/HIDDEN CREEK 2ND & 3RD ADDITIONS Mr. Koolick noted a correction for OutJot A. Hidden Creek 3rd Addition. It should be $94.93. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, the Counc i I accept deeds on Outlots A. B, and C as presented and that the City pays those reaJ estate taxes due on those properties. DI SCUSSION: Attorney Hawkins noted they were outJots in the p1at that wouJd have been tax exempt. but the taxes when on them because they were not deeded to the City. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT Counc II reviewed the request of Mr. Stone for Public Works capital equipment and discussed going out for equipment bonds. It was agreed that the various departments should prepare a five-year capltaJ Improvements plan. The various departments are also to be notified aSking them to present their requests for capital Items for 1990, Including an accurate cost for the voting machines. MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Perry. that we authorize Frank (Stone) to begin the process of collecting bids on the three Items. the VAC-A 1 I , truck front plow wing and sander, and to replace the fueJ tanks, and come back when the bids have come in: and at the same time ask Ci ty Staff to request a I I departments for five-year capitaJ equipment budgets which is íealistic that we can review to help us p1an out what we are to do the next five Years. Motion carried unanimously. -- Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - May 1 , 1990 Page 10 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL COMPUTER Mr. Stone explained the Gopher State One Call Is takIng a lot of time. Responding to those calls Is almost becoming a ful I-time job. He reviewed the different computer options to be able to automatlcalJy accept the calls. Counc i I suggested buying only the software and using it on the PC recently purchased for State Ald. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel. that we authorize Frank Stone to purchase the software for the Gopher State One Call system for the approximate price of $750 and we decline the yearJy maintenance, shipping and Installation and other items as ] Isted on the proposa I : and that the moneys for this purchase to come out of funds to be determined by Frank Stone and Howard Koollck from the seWer and water budgets. Motion carried unanimously. Counc i I asked that the Staff keep track of the calls coming In and the costs, after which they will look Into the possibilIty of bil ling for the City's costs. DISCUSS ION: UNPAID DEVELOPER ASSESSMENTS Mr. Koolick stated that the assessments for Kensington Estates have now been paid. The only outstanding assessments are for Bent Creek Estates. noting the development contract calJs for the assessments to be paid in fu II the next year less whatever Is escrowed. He asked for Counc i I direction. Councilmember Orttel noted I f the assessments are certified now, they do not have to be paid for four years. He was concerned over that requirement in the development contract, noting they have greater f I ex i b I lit Y if the rol I is certified directly to the County than i f the City retains it. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, a Resolution as prepared with the following addition: that this be certified ten days from now. that this would give the developer additional time to come in and pay his assessments. It they are not paid within ten days. this would be certified with the county. It, within ten days, they are not paid, that the City would not issue any further building permits on those lots untIl the individuaJ assessments have been paid. DISCUSS ION: Mr. Schrantz stated he would talk with the developer again, thinking there may have been some misunderstanding of the procedure. CounciJmember Orttel disagreed with wlthhoIding buIlding permits, as that makes the lots unbuildable. Councllmember Jacobson AMENDED THE MOTION: removing the section that building permits would be pul led. Second Stands. (See Resolution R056-90) Motion carried unanimously. , . -- -- Regular City CounciI Meet! ng Minutes - May 1 , 1990 Page 1 1 APPROVE FINANCIAL PROJECTION/FIRE DEPARTMENT BOND Mr. Koolick reviewed his memorandum to the Council of four financial projections on the proposed Fire Department bond I ssue made wi th varying assumptions. In Scenarios #3 and #4, he used a growth factor of two percent, though I t is an arbitrary figure since there Is no way to equate previous growth trends to the current property tax system. After some discussion, Counc i I agreed the Fire Department should use Scenario #1, which assumes increasing yearly principal payments, for presenting the Information to the residents. APPROVE LEASE/AAA BUILDING MOTION by Orttel. Seconded by Knight, authorize the Mayor and Clerk to enter into a lease agreement reJating to the Andover Athletic Association for their building. Motion carried unanimously. ORDER RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS/UNIVERSITY & 165TH AVENUE MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, order preparation of right-of-way plans for Project 90-10. University Avenue from 152nd Avenue to 157th Avenue. (See Res. R057-90) Motion carried unanimouslY. MOTION by Perry. Seconded by Jacobson, that we table the Resolution ordering preparation of plans for Project 90-9, 165th Avenue from Val Jey Drive to Round Lake Boulevard pending the Fire Department bond Issue. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, the Resolution as presented for Project 90-11 (University Avenue from 157th Avenue to Constance Boulevard area) (See Resolution R058-90) DISCUSSION: Mr. Schrantz noted this project Is being done by Ham Lake. Counc i I was told this does not mean the ordering of the proj ect. Motion carried unanimously. ILSE VARIANCE RESOLUTION MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight. the ResoJutlon as presented wi th the change that this not be effective until the City has received written permission from Carol Pletan as to her agreement to this project. (See Resolution R059-90) Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE RESOLUTION/FIRE DEPARTMENT BOND ELECTION MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Jacobson, a ResoIution determining to issue bonds for the purpose of acquisition of land and the construction thereon and equipping ot two new fire stations and providing for an election thereon. (See ResoJution R060-90) Mot! on carried unanimously. 00- Regular City Counci Meeting Minutes - May 1 . 1990 Page 12 SET WORK SESSION Counc i J agreed to a work session on Thursday, May 17. 1990, 7 p.m., at the Andover City Hall to discuss the WDE site proposal and the assessment manual. DISCUSSION/ADULT BOOKSTORES Me. Schrantz noted Staff is already gathering information on ordinances relating to adult bookstores. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Perry, that we refer this to the P & 2 for Immediate action. Motion carried unanimousJy. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Mr. Koolick reviewed the new system of printing out claims. Checks wi I I not be written out until the claims have been approved, and specific check numbers will no longer be approved. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight. approva] of Check Numbers 5221 through 5223 and 10001 through 10180 In the amount of $122,163.70. Motion carried unanImously. MOTION by OrtteJ to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted, \~~~~ Marcel]a A. Peach Recording Secretary --