Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC June 20, 1989 ..~. CITY of ANDOVER Regular city Council Meeting - June 20, 1989 7:30 P.M. Call to Order Resident Forum Agenda Approval Approval of Minutes Discussion Items 1. Bond Sale 2. Declare Cost/Order Public Hearing/IP86-21 3. Order Public HearingjWatt's Garden Acres Area Storm Drain 4 . Wandersee Revised Sketch plan 5. Order street Lights 6. Receive Petition/173rd & Navajo, Cont. 7. Turf Establishment 8. CCWD Appointee Closed Meeting W/City Attorney Staff, Committee, Commission 9. Affirmative Action Plan 10. Approve Disaster plan 11. J. Kuhlmey Lot Purchase Non-Discussion items 12. Receive Petition/Stop Signs/Northglen 5th 13. Joint Powers Agreement/Coon Rapids/Kirby's Est. 14. Accept Deed/Outlot A Old Colony Estates 15. Approve plans & Specs/prairie Road/IP89-3 16. Approve plans & SpecsjWater Tower 17 . Payment to Ham Lake/University Ave. 18. Approve 1988 Audit Report Approval of Claims Adjournment ·~,." .~ r CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW< . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 20, 1989 MINUTES The Regular BI-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City CouncIl was called to order by Mayor Jim EllIng on June 20, 1989, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, MInnesota. Councilmen present: Jacobson, KnIght, Orttel, Perry Councilmen absent: None Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; TKDA Engineer. John Davidson; Assistant City Engineer, Todd . Haas; City Planner, Jay Blake; CIty FInance Director, Howard Koollck; City AdminIstrator, James Schrantz; others RESIDENT FORUM Joan Davis. 1177 161st Avenue NW - wondered If the SAC charges they paid wIll ever be returned to the people. Mr. Schrantz stated they will be looking at that In the near future. There was talk of refunding to those who are outsIde of the serviceable area, and they will be contacting those to see If they want their SAC charge refunded. The service area wIll be more closely determined and will be those properties that can be served wIth gravity. The area on 161st Avenue probably will not be In the serviceable area. The matter of Interest on the money to be refunded needs to be addressed as well. A resident asked the Council If the CIty has taken a positIon on the three county positions that wIll become appointed positions. She stated their neighborhood Is opposed to changing those elected positions to appointed positions and was told It takes 10 percent of the voters to sIgn a petition to stop It. Attorney Hawkins stated It was special legislatIon that allows the County Board to change those positions to appointed ones. He was not aware of any referendum provision to stop It. It Is county legIslatIon, feellng~any petition should go through the county, not the city. / The resident stated the county told her to discuss It with the City CouncIl. She again asked If the City Is going to do anything to stop It, as the residents do not want that change. Counc II stated nothing has been done on the City level, thinking there was little the City could do to change that special legislation. No action was taken. AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by KnIght, to approve the Agenda as amended, with the addition of Item 19, Catchall/Mayor's Report. Motion carried unanimously. - Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20, 1989 Page 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry. approval of the June 1 Minutes. MotIon carrIed on a 4-Yes. I-Present (Knight) vote. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry. approval of the June 6 Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. BOND SALE Attorney Hawkins explained the City has received bids for the sale of $3.200.000 General OblIgation Improvement bonds to finance va~lous p~oJects In the City. They are 12-year permanent bonds. He noted Moody's has retained the City's Baa 1 ratIng for Its proJects and an A ratIng on the State Aid Street bonds. He also noted Moody's has expressed concern about the rapid growth In the City and the financing of the City's debt. The City should be cautious about Its Involvement In the fundIng of bonds In the future whIch would have a negative effect on the ratings. Attorney HawkIns then opened the following bids: SubmItted by First National Bank and AssociatIons. etc.; Bid Price of $3.164.800; Total Inte~est Cost of $1.548.964.58 for a Net Interest Rate of 6.7591% Submitted by Miller SecurIties, etc.; Bid PrIce of $3.161.600; Total Interest Cost of $1.555.987.50 for a Net Interest Rate of 6.7897% Submitted by Plpe~ Jaffrey, etc.; Bid P~lce of $3.161,600; Total Interest Cost of $1.561.743.75 for a Net Interest Rate of 6.8148% Attorney Hawkins recommended awarding the bid to the low bid of First National Bank. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight. a ResolutIon awarding the sale of $3.200.000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Se~les 1989A; fixing their form and specifications; directIng their execution and delivery; and p~ovldlng for their payment. as presented, and note that the bId Is awarded to First National Bank and Its Associates for a Bid Price of $3,167,800, net Interest ~ate of 6.7591. (See Resolution R108-89) MotIon carried unanimouslY. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20, 1989 Page 3 DECLARE COST/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING/IP86-21 Bill Ottensman of Coon RapIds explained the costs for the sanitary sewer and watermaln were close to the feasibility estimate. Howeve~, the costs for the storm draInage exceeded the original estImates. He outlined the overall storm drainage system for the basin In Andover and Coon Rapids, noting what has been constructed and what wIll be done In the future to complete the system. The actual ac~eage assessment rates fo~ trunk and lateral storm sewers were determined by addIng the actual cost of the system constructed from Jay Street to Coon Creek plus an estImated cost of what will be constructed In the basin In the future divided by the total assessable acreage. Mr. Ottensman stated the original project Included some pipe plus a ditch system. When they designed It, It was found to be more economical to pipe the entire system because of the high cost of acquiring right of way for ditches. The cost of acquiring right of way was not included In the original cost figures. Also, grading was not a known factor when the feasibility was done. and In some cases the grading changed as a result of the pipe. He explained the assessment consists of the trunk and lateral costs. The trunk costs are close to the original estimates; however, the lateral costs came In high because of the additional pieces of pipe both to replace the proposed ditches plus additional pipe In the total system. Mr. Ottensman also stated Coon Rapids paid for only one of the ponds in the system; the rest were dedIcated as part of the developments. The costs to Andover at this time are only fo~ that area east of Jay Street that has al~eady been const~ucted. As the rest of the pieces are built, those pieces will be assessed at a cost equal to what this area Is paying, adJusted for construction cost Increases and Inflation. The costs per acre are the same for both Andover and Coon Rapids residents. Coon Rapids received these costs about a month ago. Mr. Davidson explained there were some lots that Good Value paid all of the storm sewer costs which drain down from the no~th Into this System. Mr. Ottensman stated If the~e are some areas that they are not aware of, they should be put Into these costs and averaged back out. Council agreed that should be done to determine If It makes a difference in the assessment amount. They also asked Mr. Schrantz to contact Good Value Homes regarding their opinion on the proposed assessments. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, that we move this Item to the next regularly scheduled meeting to allow the engineers and developers to look over the data. Motion car~led unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20. 1989 Page 4 ORDER PUBLIC HEARING/wATT'S GARDEN ACRES AREA STORM DRAIN Mr. Schrantz recommended the Council order a feaslbllty report for the storm drainage Imp~ovements In Watt's Garden Acres a~ea so that when the Kirby Estates plat comes In, the City Is ready to do the storm drainage for the entl~e area at the same time. He doesn't want to slow down Kirby Estates by having to walt for the Watt's Garden Acres area hearings. etc. Council questioned the need to do the entl~e area since Kirby Estates Is capable of handling Its own wate~ on site. Also, the area outside Kirby Estates has not asked tor any Improvements. Mr. Schrantz explained the storm drainage for Kirby Estates Is not all Internal. He recommended BRW be asked to do a feasibility report for the contributing area when everything Is In place when KI~bY Estates comes In. Part of the storm drainage cost will be the buying and const~uctlng of the pond, which has been Included as part of the overall costs that Coon Rapids has already estimated. M~. Ottensman stated a tentative agreement has been reached with Huble Smith to construct a pond on his property as part of the storm drainage system. Terry Herman, BRW, reviewed the proposed project for storm drainage between Jay Street and Hanson Boulevard. The system has been designed as a total system, so whether Kirby Estates can go on Its own at this time Is redundant. It has been modeled Into the entire system. They want to move the pond onto Mr. Smith's property because of the lots being put In Coon Rapids and because of the road. 133rd. The natural contours are such that pondlng would occur there natu~ally If they did nothing. It also appears there Is much mo~e organic material on the Smith property than In the area to the south. Council stilI had reservations about the proposed p~oJect. Councllmembe~ O~ttel was concerned about assessing ahead of a project. which Is contrary to the City's policy, and about providing drainage for the proposed Site a landfill. It was then agreed to order the feasibility report to find out the costs and what the p~oJect would entail. MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Knight. a Resolution as p~epared ordering p~eparatlon of a feasibility report for the Improvements of storm dalnage. Project No. 89-18, In the southeast part of Watt's Garden Ac~es area. (See Resolution R109-89) DISCUSSION: Motion carried unanimously. WANDERSEE REVISED SKETCH PLAN Mr. Haas reviewed the revised sketch plan In Section 29, noting the Staff's recommendation to align the proposed futu~e street with 142nd and to provide a tralngular-shaped piece to a future lot south of the Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20, 1989 Page 5 (Wandersee Revised Sketch Plan, Continued) plat off Undercllft so It would have the proper frontage. The street alignment has been changed to provide access to the Sonsteby and Hagen property to the south. TKDA feels the lots can be served from the north with sanitary sewer. Water Is on the east side of Round Lake Boulevard at 142nd. Outlot A would remain In the ownership of Mr. Wandersee with the Intent that It would be built as a road once the Hagen property develops. The owner of Lot 2 stated he does not have water and has not been assessed for it. Mr. Haas stated the servicing and assessment of Lot 2 needs to be addressed. Bob Wondersee stated he has been dealing with Ms. Sonsteby for the property Immediately south of this. He understood If water comes In. It would serve the entire street. not Just those few lots. Council noted the City requires all new lots to have sewer and water. Council generally had no problem with the sketch plan, recommending It proceed to the Planning and Zoning Commission. ORDER STREET LIGHTS Mr. Haas stated he prioritized the lights based on visibilIty and traffic. Mr. Koollck noted there Is nothing In the 1989 capital budget for street light Installation. He asked whether he should bring the Item up again should a budget transfer be possible In the future. Mr. Schrantz explained the thinking at the time of the budget was that the street lights at the Intersections of new developments would be paid for by the developer. MOTION by Perry. Seconded by Jacobson. that we continue to table this Item until September, 1989. at which time If the Finance DIrector indicates that there may be monies. we can reconsider. Motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE PETITION/173RD AND NAVAJO. CONTINUED Mr. Schrantz revIewed hIs memo showing a possible method of assessing the project. Residents on Navajo have requested 173rd to be paved; the property owners on 173rd have not petitioned for the Improvement. He noted If 173rd around to 175th were paved and those In Grow Oak View Estates paid $1,700 per unit. the estimated costs to everyone along 173rd and 175th would pay about $2,650. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20. 1989 Page 6 (Receive Petltlon/173rd and NavaJo, Continued) Councllmember Orttel understood If the resIdents on NavaJo are Included as assessable parcels, the the petition meets the 35 percent requirement. Attorney Hawkins advIsed the State Statute does not dIfferentiate between the size of the assessment. An area not directly abutting the project can be Included In the assessment area If It Is deemed they receive benefit from It. RIchard Wandersee. 17315 NavaJo - stated they were approached last winter, but he did not sign the petition because it did not have ::sufficient Information. HIs position Is that If the proJect Is going to be done, 175th should be Included. He was concerned about paving only a portion of that road and leaving a small unpaved portion that requires a lot of maintenance. Councllmember Perry felt the cost of the entIre project of 173rd and 175th should be borne by the total number of unl ts, Incudlng those on Navajo. She also felt the people along 175th should be contacted about this proJect. Larrv Schalo. 17190 NavaJo - asked how many more units are there by going down 175th. He stated he has been trying to get 173rd paved to NavaJo since last May. Now the Counc II Is saying the residents should be contacted, meaning It will delay the proJect even longer. The resIdents know what they want tarred -- 173rd to Navajo -- and are willing to pay $1,700 each toward that project. They do not want to contrIbute to the portIon of the road at 175th, as they don't see a need for 175th to be paved. He didn't want to attend any more meetings on the Issue, Just wanting to get that portion done. There was a lengthy discussIon regarding dIfferent scenarios as to how much of the project should be done and how It should be assessed. There was no consensus as to how many units there would be In the proJect. Councllmember Knight felt hIs property would only be assessed on one side, not both. Councllmember Perry stated they face Seventh Avenue. and the poliCY states side yards are not assessed. Counclmember Jacobson had a problem assessing someone for a road that they do not front on. If the resIdents want to donate $1,700 toward the proJect. that would be fine; but he did not feel the City should be assessing them for It. Mr. Schalo - stated the Perry's have an exit onto 173rd from theIr barn and therefore felt that property should pay for that access. He again stated he Is only Interested In getting the road done. Councllmember Orttel thought the Perry property was Included In the number of unIts, but felt It Is unfair to ask the people on Navajo to subsidize the people who have direct access onto the street. He suggested the possibility of making It two projects -- 173rd to NavaJo, and from NavaJo around to the exIting tar on 175th. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20, 1989 Page 7 (Receive Petltlon/173rd and NavaJo. Continued) Counc II noted no one along 173rd or 175th had been contacted about an Improvement p~oJect. and those people have not asked for It. Mr. Wandersee stated he could carry a petition around. It was f I na I I y ag~eed to order a feasibility to determine costs for several different scenarios. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, that we order a feasibility study for three distinct projects: 1) 173rd from Seventh to Navajo as one proJect with contributions by everyone; 2) NavaJo around 175th to Seventh as a separate project; 3) without any contributions from the people on Navajo. When we get the feasibility study, hold a public hearing. (See Resolution Rl10-89) Motion carried unanimously. Counc II recessed at 9:161 reconvened at 9:24 p.m. TURF ESTABLISHMENT Mr. Davidson reported he viewed the sod with Mr. Schrantz and found that most of It has re-establlshed Itself. There are some spots that are not growing along the easements on Crosstown Boulevard. They have ordered the contractor to sod the areas that need sodding under the contract unit prices. There Is some money left In the funds that were assessed and unused engineering funds that can be used to pay for It. No Counc II action was taken. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECS/WATER TOWER Mr. Davidson reviewed the proposal to bid for two styles of water towe~s plus alternates on sealing and service doors. The funds for this tower were Included In the bond Issue approved this evening. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, the Resolution as presented, with the bids to be opened at 10 a.m., Tuesday, July 25, at the Andover City Hall. (See Resolution R111-89 approving final plans and specifications and ordering advertisements for bids for ProJect No. 89-35, Tower #2 for trunk and water tower construction) Motion carried unanimously. J. KUHLMEY LOT PURCHASE Mr. Blake Informed the CouncIl that JIm Kuhlmey Is unable to complete the terms of his purchase agreement of Lot 3, Block 2 of the Commercial Park because of significantly slower business during the first half of this year. Mr. Kuhlmey has Indicated a willingness to forfeit the $1.000 deposit and possibly pay for staff time as well. : Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20. 1989 Page 8 (J. Kuhlmey Lot Purchase, Continued) Jim Kuhlmev - stated he could buy the lot but It would create a large hardship on him and he wouldn't be able to put up a building within a year. About 98 percent of his work Is residential, and that has been about half for the last year. His original request was to pay for the staff time but to get the rest of his deposit back. Attorney Hawkins doubted more than $500 had been expended by his office on the matter. After some discussion, Council generally agreed that the City should keep the deposit to pay for the staff and attorney time spent on the matter and because the lot was off the market all thIs time. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, that the City Council allow the contract between the City and Mr. Jim Kuhlmey for Lot 3, Block 2 of the Andover Commercial Park to be rescinded under the stipulation that the $1,000 deposit put down by Mr. Kuhlmey on the lot be forfeIted for allowing the contract to be cancelled. Motion carried unanimously. COON CREEK WATERSHED APPOINTEE Councl]member Perry stated she was not able to contact the applicants and would not vote on the Issue. Councllmember Jacobson stated he contacted all but one of the Individuals, noting Howard Nelsen has stated he Is no longer Interested In the position. There was a lengthy discussion on prioritizing the applicants. Mayor Elling stated the County Board will not make an appointment unless the list of names Is ranked. Councllmember Orttel felt the City met Its legal obligation last year by Just submitting the list of names and that the City Is not required to prioritize them. He felt It was absurd that the Council Is forced to do what the County Board should be doing, as It Is transferring their responsibility to the City. He suggested the City ask the County Board to make a permanent appointment to the Watershed Board. Mayor Elling stated they will not do that unless the applicants are prioritized. Councllmembers Jacobson, Knight, and Perry felt because of the problems the City has encountered with the policies of the Coon Creek Watershed Board over the past several years. that It Is time for a change of representation on that Board. But the Council also generally acknowledged that the member currently serving on the Board Is very knowledgeable. Councllmember Jacobson recommended Robert Boyum as first choice. Council noted It Is very difficult to prioritize since all are good applicants, and there was some discussion on how the remaining applicants should be ranked. Regular City Council Meeting MInutes - June 20, 1989 Page 9 (Coon Creek Watershed Appointee, Continued> MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, that we send the list as prepared before us with Howard Nelsen's name removed, and Indicate to the Anoka County Board that our first choice for the representative from Andover to serve on the Coon Creek Watershed Board be Mr. Robert Boyum. DISCUSSION: There was some attempt to prIoritize the remaining applicants; but some Councllmembers Just did not know how they should be ranked, and Councllmember Orttel was uncomfortable with doing any prioritizing. It was finally agreed to recommend only a first choice to the County Board. Motion carried on a 4-Yes. I-Abstain (Perry> vote. Council went Into closed session with the City Attorney regarding several legal matters. 10:12; reconvened at 10:35 p.m. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN The Council agreed to the following: Section II: The EEO/AA OffIcer shall be the Finance Director Section VII: Shall state, "None Identifiable at this time." Section VIII: Shall be worded by the Finance Director to state the following Idea: It shall be the goal of the City of Andover to continue to provide opportunities for employment regardless of race, color. sex, or physical disabilities. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, a Resolution adopting the Affirmative Action Program for the City of Andover as presented. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE DISASTER PLAN MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, to adopt the Disaster Plan as presented with the change In Paragraph 4, Page 7 to read: Upon recommendation, the City Administrator may be requested to declare a State of Emergency In order to request State and Federal assistance. And on Page 25, delete everything on the page except the Committee Members list. Motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE PETITION/STOP SIGNS/NORTHGLEN 5TH MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Perry, that we Install stop signs as called for In this statement presented. MotIon carried unanimously. (Stop signs at Aztec and 140th Avenue and at Yucca and 139th Lane> Regular City Council Meeting MInutes - June 20. 1989 Page 10 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT/COON RAPIDS/KIRBY'S ESTATES Mr. Schrantz asked to continue the Item because he dId not yet have the agreement. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by KnIght, to so move. Motion carried unanimously. ACCEPT DEED/OUTLOT A OLD COLONY ESTATES Council directed that the deed be given to the Coon Creek Watershed Board since the pond Is part of thel~ pondlng p~ogram, not the City's. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECS/PRAIRIE ROAD/IP89-S MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, Int~oduclng a Resolution approving final plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids for ProJect No. 89-S, Prairie Road for street construction. (See Resolution R112-89) Motion carried unanimously. PAYMENT TO HAM LAKE/UNIVERSITY AVENUE The general feeling of the Council was that no one In Andover was paid for right of way for these proJects: therefo~e, Andover residents should not be assessed. The monies should come out of the MSA fund. MOTION by Orttel. Seconded by Knight, that the Council authorize Staff to prepare documents to send the bill for ProJects 88-15 and 88-10 done In conjunction with the City of Ham Lake to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for Municipal State Aid reimbursement and to pay the City of Ham Lake the funds. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Abstain (Jacobson because he Is a prope~ty owner In the project) vote. APPROVAL OF 1988 AUDIT REPORT MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, receiving the Auditor's Report for 1988. Motion carried unanimously. CATCH-ALL/MAYOR'S REPORT Mayo, Elling noted the memo from Mr. Blake asking that the Recycling CoordInator position be extended an additional three months at 16 hours per week. There are CDBG funds available for this. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20, 1989 Page 11 (Catch-AII/Mayo~'s Report, Continued) MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight. that we authorize the extension of employment for Cindy (DeRuyter) to the extent that we are sure of funding by Anoka County to cove~ her with continued employment as noted In the memorandum sent to the Council of June 20 by Jay Blake. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Elling stated he has received a call from a potential buyer of five acres on 163rd and Makah who wants to put up a pole barn to store his refrlge~ated semi-truck. The Mayor told him of the Special Use Permit p~ocess but dIdn't think the Council had been receptive to such uses In the past. He asked for the Council's position. Councllmember Orttel didn't feel a Special Use Permit was needed as long as It Is parked Inside a building. Councllmembers Perry and Knight preferred to see the Item go through the P & Z hearing process to determine whether a Permit Is needed and for the City to have an opportunity to look at It. No action was taken. Mayo~ Elling asked If another date should be scheduled to meet with members of the Coon Creek Watershed Board. After discussion, Council preferred to walt until a permanent appointment Is made to the Board. Mr. Schrantz was directed to ask AI Sannerud to write a letter to the Council about the Watershed Board's financing proposal, what projects they plan to do and how they are planning to do them. Mayor Elling recommended the Council appoint Gerry Wagner to the Cable Commission. MOTION by O~ttel. Seconded by Jacobson, that Ger~y Wagner be appointed to the Cable Commission. Motion carried unanimously. Council agreed the Park and Recreation Commission should Interview the five applicants for that Commission and make a recommendation to the Council. Mayor Elling asked that the Economic Development Committee look at what the City should be doing next In the Tax Increment Financing District and make a ~ecommendatlon to the Council. Councllmembe~ Knight stated that Item Is on their next Agenda. Mayor Elling noted the letter from HUD regarding the Waste Disposal Site and the South Andover Site and requesting the City to place some restrictions on buildings within 200 feet of the toe of the slope of the existing landfill. The FHA will not finance anything In there, and the PCA has requested the Council to take some postlve action to Insure there Is no methane gas problem In the future. It was agreed to place this Item on the next Agenda. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20. 1989 Page 12 (Catch-All/Mayor's Repo~t, Continued> Mayo~ Elling ~eported apparently Ham Lake has app~oved the I-acre PUD off University Avenue and Is In the procese of going ahead with the p~oposed air strip and housing development In that area. He recommended the Council pass a resolution to be presented to Ham Lake saying Andover Is opposed to the air field because of the noise and Impact It has on Andove~ residents. The Counc II felt the matter should be looked Into regarding the procedure and use per Ham Lake's o~dlnances. Ron Ferris - stated on May 15 the PUD was approved by Ham Lake without a public hearing. He said the residents In that area paid about $38.000 In legal fees to fight the wlnte~ festival proposal. and they are not willing to do that again. The residents are definitely opposed to the airport. as once a plane Is 50 feet from the airport. It Is In Andover. Mr. Ferris said he talked with his attorney, who advised him the only course of action that can be taken Is to appeal to the Metropolitan Council to Intercede because It decreases the values In Andover within the traffic pattern or to take legal action against Ham Lake with a restraining o~der and follow up with a suit. He felt this needs to be addressed by the City of Andover, that the residents will have no effect In this matte~. After further discussion. the Council directed the Staff to p~epare a resolution opposing the airport for consideration at the next meeting. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Perry. Checks 16710 through 16783 In the amount of $167,942. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Orttel to adJourn. Motion ca~rled unanimously, Meeting adJourned at 11:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted. ~~GX?,<-l Mar ella A. Peach Recording Secretary