Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP November 10, 1988 C}\ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 10, 1988 MINUTES A SpeclaJ Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Wlndschltl on November 10, 1988, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City HaJI, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. CouncIlmen present: ApeJ, Elling, Knight, Orttel Councilmen absent: None Also present: City Clerk, Victoria Volk and City Administrator, James Schrantz CANVASSING THE ELECTION RETURNS Ms. Volk stated In Precinct 2 a husband and wife came In to vote but were not registered. The wife had a drivers license, registered and voted. The husband had lost his drivers license and was not al lowed to vote. Ms. Volk stated he should have been allowed to vote because the wife could have vouched for him. It was an error on the part of the judges. Ms. Volk stated there were quite a few people who were not registered and who could not vote because they did not have proper proof of residency. But none of the jUdges raised any issues. In Precinct 4 a man called her all upset because he signed the register book, got his receipt and stood In line for quite some time to get his ballot. When he got to the front of the line, he was made to go to the back of the line, so he left . As I t turned out, he never signed In or received his receipt. Later that day the Chief Judge of Precinct 4 calJed the gentleman at home, talked with him, and he came back to vote. Ms. Volk stated there were compJalnts about not enough judges at the church. She also felt there Is a need to have more precincts to avoid the long Jines. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Apel, Introducing a Resolution canvassing the returns of the Municipal eleGtlon held on the 8th Day of November, 1988, In the City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota, as presented. DISCUSSION: Councilman Orttel questioned the accuracy of the percentages calcuJated for the Councilmen In Precinct 2. Action on this motion was taken later In the meeting when the percentages were recalculated. APPOINTMENT OF NEW COUNCILMEMBER Ms. Volk stated she called the State Ejection Department regarding the opening on the Counc II as of the first of the year. The appointed Counci1person cannot take office untl1 the first of the year. - Special Ci ty Counci I Meeting November 10. 1988 - Minutes Page 2 (Appointment of New Counci Imember, Continued) According to the City Attorney, this Counci I can appoint someone now so there is a fulJ Counc i I for the first meeting In 1989 or wait and let the new Counc i I fill the position. The Counc i I can either appoint someone or advertise for appl ications. Counc i I discussed the two options, generally agreeing to advertise for the positIon. There was a debate on whether this Council or the new one should fl I I the position. Councilmen EJling and Knight felt the new Counc I I should appoint the new CounciJmember since they wi I I be working with him, that it should be done when there actualJy is an opening after the first of the year. It would also al low the new Counc i Imember, Don Jacobson, some Input into the process. Councilmen ApeJ and Orttel argued that with a four-person Council, it could result in the Mayor having to choose the new Councllmember. That wouldn't happen i f the position were flJJed before the first of the year. Then the new year could be opened with a ful I Councl I. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Orttel, that this Councl I as it sets here advertise and select a CounciJman before the first of January so that at the first meeting in January there would be a ful I and complete CounciJ: that we advertise for people for the Counc i I vacancy unt II the 9th of December, and that we Interview the applicants sometime prior to the meeting on the 20th of December. We would set the date for interviews If we wanted to on the 6th of December. DISCUSSION: Councilman Orttel asked that Mr. Jacobson be invited to the meeting and al low any questions he may have to be heard. He stated his concern is getting the interview process started and to talk to the Attorney at the next meeting, giving this further consideration In the meantime. Councilmen Knight and EI ling both expressed disappoint- ment at the point of view taken in this motion, feel ing It is unnecessariJy politicizing. VOTE ON THE MOTION: YES-Ape I , OrtteJ, Windschitl: NO-EI I lng, Knight Motion carried. CANVASSING ELECTION RETURNS. CONTINUED Mr. Schrantz stated the correct percentages for the Council seats In Precinct 2 are: Don Jacobson - 32.3, Bi I I LeFebvre - 28.8, Ken Orttel - 38.8. (See Resolution R261-88) Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Knight. to adjourn. Moti on carr led unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7:56 p.m. Respect fu I I y suþmLU.ed,., 'f ' '~L ..~ \. , \ ~'~\-'k CC '~E,-,<- Mar ella A. Peach, Recording Secretary