Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC September 16, 1986 CITY of ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16, 1986-AGENDA 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to order 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4. Continued Public Hearing/Dehn's/86-19 5. Discussion Items a. Blaine Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Lot Split b. Final Plat/Goodridge Acres I c. Final Plat/Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition d. Award Contract/86-12/154th Lane and Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition e. Police Report/139th Avenue Speeding f. Conroy Assessment Split, Cont. g. Typical Section/133rd Avenue h. Award Contract/Declare Cost/86-3 i. 6. Staff, Commission, Committee Reports a. Fire Department/Sprinkling Codes b. 7. Non-Discussion Items a. R/W Acquisition-85-8/Green b. Park ordinance/Hours C. Approve Street Specifications d. Award Sealcoat Bid/86-23 e. $2,600,000 Bond Sale f. 8. Approval of Minutes 9. Approval of Claims 10. Adjournment --' h_ _ CITY of ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschitl on September 16, 1986, 7:30 p.m, at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Councilmen present: Elling, Knight, Lachinski, Orttel Councilmen absent: None Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; City Administrator/ Engineer, James E. Schrantz; and others RESIDENT FORUM Gary Steinke, 164th Lane - asked several questions relating to the road improvement proJect on 164th such as whether the original plans called for the road to be 24 or 33 feet wide, whether the turnaround at the end was in the feasibility report, how big that turnaround will be stating it really cuts into the lots on the end, and the centering of the road. Mr. Schrantz stated it will be a 24-foot road with a one-foot berm on each side. He stated the turnaround wasn't in the feasibility report, but thought it was staked for a 40-foot radius. The cu1 de sac will need to stay within the City's right of way, which he stated is a 30-foot radius. However, if the person on the end wants to be involved in the project, possibly a turnaround can be obtained off the end of the street instead. He didn't know what that property owner was p lanni·ng. Mr. Schrantz stated it was just staked today, and he will look at it to see that it is properly staked. The traveled road is off center to the south, but the paved road will be put on center. He wi 11 check on that with the surveyor also. He also agreed to discuss this with affected residents on site. Wayne Backman, New Generation Homes - asked that the Preliminary Plat of Indian Meadows be p laced on the Agenda for further consideration. Council agreed. AGENDA APPROVAL The following changes to the Agenda were suggested: Delete Items Sa, Blaine Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Lot Split and 5b, Final Plat/Goodridge Acres; Add Items 5j, Cable Commission; 5k, Indian Meadows Preliminary Plat; 51, Hills of Bunker Lake Sketch Plan; 5m, Tonsen Tire Operation; 5n, Coon CreeklWatershed Comprehensive PIlan; 50, Highway 47 Designation Change; and 5p, Computer. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we accept the Agenda as amended. Motlon carried unanimously. I CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING/DEHN'S/86-19 Attorney Hawkins reviewed his letter advising that there are excess funds available in the 80-3 project fund of up to $100,000 that could be used toward the storm drainage project. Council also noted the County is willing to contribute $9,000 toward this project, but the last item of requesting Good Value Homes to fund the pipe outlet from the Northg1en 2nd Addition pond to the proposed storm drainage pipe along County 116 new alignment has not y~t been reso 1 ved. With the expanded district to include the areas from the 80-3 project and the County contribution, it was felt at this point the project is feasible. Council then agreed to send notices to those properties which would be assessed as to the Regular City Council Meeting September 16, 1986 - Minutes Page 2 (Continued Public Hearing/Dehn's/86-19) amount of that assessment and the continued public hearing date. Council agreed with the Engineer's recommendation to give notice at 1.5 cents per square foot for the assessment for both developed and undeveloped properties. No decision was made at this time for deferring the assessment on undeveloped properties, agreeing to discuss that further at the continued public hearing. The Engineers briefly reviewed the map explaining the expanded district and the proposal to close off the northern gooseneck between the pond acquired by the County and the pond to the west and to have Good Value Homes build an outlet pipe from the Good Value pond to that in the county ditch system. Rosella Sonsteby - asked the elevation of the pipe that would be constructed from the Good Value pond to the west. Mayor Windschitl stated that will be set by the DNR, but understood it would be at approximately 868. Ms. Sonsteby - stated then all that water will stay there and it will not do her any good. Then it is silly to have a pipe in there at that elevation. Mayor Windschitl noted the City has no control over that, as it will be set by the DNR; but he understood the DNR wants standing water in that pond the County acquired. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that we authorize the firm of TKDA to prepare plans and specifications for the southwest area storm water drainage project and continue the public hearing to September 30, 1986, at 7:30 at the City Hall; and notify property owners affected as to the time and place and amount of the potential assessment. (See Resolution R150-86) Moti on carri ed unanimous ly. ANOKA STORM WATER BOUNDARY AGREEMENT Council reviewed the proposed agreement. agreeing to change Item VI by deleting everything after the words".. .Exhibit 1." Mr. Schrantz explained Exhibit 1 will include the original basin around the Sonsteby/Dehn's pond area plus the area of the 80-3 project. Council agreed the Agreement should be reviewed by the City Attorney. MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Knight, that the Council approve the Storm Water Boundary Agreement between the City of Andover and the City of Anoka as prepared with the exception of a correction in Paragraph VI to eliminate all wording after the words "as Exhibit 1."; and that this approval be subject to reviewal and approval by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE PLAT/NIGHTINGALE ESTATES 3RD ADDITION MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, a Resolution approving the Final Plat of Nlghtlnga1e Estates 3rd Addition as being developed by Esther Olson and Gary Dehn in Section 22-32-24 subject to receipt of a favorable title opinion and the signing of a development contract. (See Resolution R151-86) Moti on carri ed unanimously. AWARD CONTRACT/86-12/154TH LANE AND NIGHTINGALE ESTATES 3RD ADDITION MOTION by.El1ing, Seconded by Knight, accepting bids and awarding contract for the Improvement of 86-12 for street construction in the area of 154th Lane and Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition to Valley Construction for a bid of $87,102.50. (See Resolution R152-86) Motion carried unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting September 16, 1986 - Minutes Page 3 POLICE REPORT/139TH AVENUE SPEEDING Mayor Windschitl read the report fran Deputy Johnson regarding the observation of 139th Avenue in the past two weeks. Of the 419 cars observed, 9 vehicles were clocked in excess of 35 mph, all of which were given warning tickets. The highest speed observed as 38 mph. Deputy Johnson recanmended the possibi lity of posting a 30 mph speed sign at the entrance to 139th Avenue east of Crosstown Boulevard for traffic entering the development. Debbie Kascht - stated the situation has improved considerably since the Deputies have been ln the vicinity more often the past two weeks, expressing appreciation for the efforts being done to lower the speed at which traffic travels down 139th. She felt the two times at which speeds are most often observed by her are around 2 to 3 o'clock when students get out of school and later on Friday and Saturday eveni ngs. Council agreed to forward these time periods to the deputies and to ask that increased surveillance be continued by the deputies through that area. Council also agreed to install two speed limit signs, one at the entrance and one at the curve. AWARD CONTRACT/DECLARE COST/86-3 John Davidson, TKDA, explained the bids for the project came in $375,000 over the engineer's estimate. He reported the additional costs were based on soils information they obtained while doing the final design. There is a substantial amount of low area to go through with the sewer pipe, and much of the cost relates to the dewatering that would need to be done in the project. Mr. Davidson also briefly reviewed an alternative method of servicing the Hanson Boulevard area by going north from the present location on Crosstown Boulevard, east on Andover Boulevard into the proposed Hills of Bunker Lake where a lift station would be constructed. He suggested this and the determination of an ultimate urban service boundary be discussed at a special workshop session of the Council. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, to set September 30 as a work meeting with TKDA regarding service to the east end of the City. DISCUSSION: Mr. Davidson recommended declaring the bids to be higher than the engineer's estimate, though there is a 60-day hold before awarding or rejecting the bids. Council agreed not to act on the bids until after the servicing of the eastern portion of the City is resolved at the work session with the engineers. Motion carried unanimously. MINING PERMIT/FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING Council reviewed the mining permit for a borrow pit in the Indian Meadows unplatted area. Lynn Caswell of John Oliver and Associates - reviewed the grading plan for the overall development of the unplatted Indlan Meadows area and a plan and profile sheet of existing and proposed grade and groundwater. He stated he received the resu lts of the soi 1 b ori ngs th i s week. He pointed out the three prq:>osed borrow areas for fill on the County 116 project through Andover, stating the grade level for all three areas would remain 6) feet above the ground water profile. The grading plan has not been updated according to the soil borings to show the areas that wi 11 need to be changed to the proposed grades and to reflect the separati on from surface to ground water. Mayor Windschit1 was concerned that the area proposed for borrow is already low, plus some of the proposed lots in that vicinity will need to be filled; but the area to the north which does have a tot of excess borrow is not being proposed in this permit. Regular City Council Meeting September 16, 1986 - Minutes Page 4 (Mining Permit/Forest Lake Contracting, Continued) Mr. Caswell stated this permit would not cover the northerly area. The owner of that property wants to limit the 9rading to that on the southern end and is considering the sale of that northern portion of the land. He estimated approximately 41,000 yards of fill will be needed within the plat itself, but there is an excess of 1.25 million yards in that area. This permit application is for 72,000± cubic yards. Mr. Schrantz was concerned as to where they want to haul the dirt out. He didn't feel the residential street of 151st is built to sustain that type of hauling. He recommended they stay ~ feet above the water table level. Other than that, he didn't have an engineering problem with the permit. Dick Spengler, Forest Lake Contracting - stated the contract calls for 72,000 yards, but they are estlmating between 10,000 to 45,000 in the southerly borrow area, 10,000 in the area adjoining County Road 7 and the remainder of whatever is required for the job from the interior of the plat, Borrow Area 3. They had hoped to take it out 151st. Council agreed with the City Engineer that the residential street would not hold up under those conditions, suggesting the contractor enter/exit via a haul road cut through the land, ideally in the vicinity of the proposed 153rd. To ensure that there will be enough dirt left on site to make all proposed lots buildab le and to ensure that the cut maintains a minimum of ~ feet above the water table, it was agreed to authorize the Engineer to set minimum elevations and to require finished grades. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that we authorize removal of up to 72,000 yards of fill from the property described as the proposed Indian Meadows subdivision on a map presented to the Council on 9-16-86, and that that fill come from Borrow Areas 1-3 designated on that map; and that the approval of the mining permit be contingent upon the City Engineer's certification that one, the minimum excavation level be ~ feet above the mottled soil level; further that the Engineer certify that there be adequate fill material left on these premises to fill any future lots as may be required; and that the contractor removing the soil be required to use other than city streets for removal of the soil; and that insurance certificate be provided and a bond in an amount to be determined by the Engineer to assure restoration; and further that restoration take place on a continuing basis as excavation areas are abandoned, restoration to be completed upon canpl!etion of the excavati on; mining to. be 'comp leted by 1-1-87. Motion carried unanimously. INDIAN MEADOWS PRELIMINARY PLAT Wayne Backman - stated there is a dispute on the property to the west where Jerry Lapham . has a fence line. Mr. Lapham]] is making a claim under abandonment or adverse possession to a 33-foot wide strip of property on his side of the fence. When they were staking the plat, they verified that Mr. Lapham\s fence is about 33 feet onto their property. It appears a quick claim deed was filed for that 33 feet in 1973. In the meantime, the people on Lot 4 have started construction of their house. He asked whether that 33-foot strip can be eliminated from the plat or platted as an outlot until that dispute is settled so he can file the plat. Council agreed the 33-foot strip will be shown as three 33-foot outlots on the final plat. If Programmed Land prevails, those out lots can be attached to the abutting lots. Regular City Council Meeting September 16, 1986 ~ Minutes Page 5 HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE SKETCH PLAN Jerry Green, Tony Emmerich and Ron Smith, developers were present. Mr. Green stated they have not heard from the City since they reviewed the proposal with the Council two weeks ago. He reviewed a revised sketch plan which proposes fewer cul de sacs, a possible school location site in the northwestern corner, over 40 acres ~or park area, plus a location for a water tower east of the railroad tracks. Mr. Green also stated he has a meeting with a representative of the School District tomorrow morning (September 17) regarding a school site on this property. Regarding the school site issue, Mayor Windschitl stated he is attempting to set up a meeting with the SChool District, Mr. Schrantz and the Park Board Chairman. The Park Board would like to look at the proposed plat at their Thursday, September 18, meeting. Mr. Green - stated the property they feel fits in well as park area for this plat amounts to over 40 acres, excluding the school site. They are proposing the City accept that 40 acres; and if the School District wants to locate on that site, they will set it aside and sell it to them. Mayor Windschit1 stated his intent was to get the school site under the park dedication formula. The School District would then develop the park; and everyone would benefit by having the school site and a developed park in that location. Mr. Green - stated that leaves them with a problem as it is engineered and laid out. There are areas that are difficult to serve that work well for parks, plus the creek frontage which is good for a nature park. Stuart Kinkade, Park Board Chairman - didn't feel the City wanted park along the ral Iroad tracks. He also felt that two 6-acre sites would be too large for parks, and questioned having park on the southwest corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard Mr. Green explained their desire for a landscaped signed entrance to the development. Council said the question is who would own and maintain that area. There was some discussion as to whether or not the nature area along the creek would be desirable as parkland. Nocconsensus was reached by the Council on. this issue. Possibly there would be some interest by the School District as to having a nature park adjoining the school site. At this point, Council felt the street layout was a considerable improvement over the last sketch plan, suggesting the developers now proceed to the Planning Commission with a preliminary plat. The Mayor stated he would attempt to attend the meeting with Mr. Green and the School District tomorrow. Council asked that the Engineers make a determination of where a water tower would best be located within this area. Council recessed at 10:05; reconvened at 10:18 p.m. COURT ORDER/WALDEN Larry Walden, Crosstown Boulevard - appeared before the Council. Attorney Hawkins explained Mr. Walden was prosecuted for violation of the City's ordinance regarding the parking of semi trucks on residential property. The court found him guilty but stayed a jail sentence on the condition the tractor or trailer not be parked on the property. Mr. Walden - stated he was given one week to find a place to park the truck. He has only one car and his wife works varied hours, so he is unable to get to his truck to work; plus he has been ill and hospitalized for several days since the Regular City Council Meeting September 16, 1986 - Minutes Page 6 (Court Order/Walden, Continued) sentence and has been unable to find a solution. He was to remove the truck by today, He asked for consideration to temporarily be allowed to keep his truck on his property during the day until he can find a way to get to it to go to work, stating this action really jeopardizes his livelihood. He felt he would be able to resolve the problem within one week. r1r. Walden also felt the law needs to be examined, feeling it is very unfair that someone driving only one truck, his own truck, on his own property should receive as severe a penalty as he did. Council discussion with Mr. Walden and the Attorney noted the agreement between the prosecuting attorney was to be in compliance within seven days (by today) to avoid the jail sentence. Attorney Hawkins advised the Council can authorize an extension of that date for compliance if the Council feels there is justification. Gi ven the persona 1 circumstances encountered by Mr. Wa 1den, Counci 1 agreed to grant an extension of time of seven days in which to find a place to park the truck, emphasizing there will be no further extensions in this matter. FIRE DEPARTMENT/SPRINKLING CODES Fire Chief Bob Palmer discussed the proposed adoption of Statute 130.150, Sprinkling Codes, stating the Building Official is in agreement with the code. A concern raised by the Council was what effect this would have relative to increased costs to the ,construction of;bu,ildings, especially ~to the:smaller. buildings and those that are not(·served with municipal water. They also questioned whether it would be necessary for cold storage buildings. Fire Marshal Ray Sowada stated they are now allowed to use a plastic tubing, which has decreased the cost of sprinkling systems considerably. Also, installing a sprinkling system can save in the overall construction because other items can then be eliminated. After some discussion, Council asked that the Fire Department determine how many cities have adopted this code, can the City adopt a code suited just to Andover, and what would the additional cost be for various sized buildings such as 2,000, 4,000 and 12,000 SF buildings. Discussion was also on the proposed County building to be constructed within the City. It was the Fire Department's desire and recommendation that it be sprinkled; the County was not willing to do so. Council thought the building permit had not yet been applied for, questioning whether an adoption of a sprinkling code at this time would be retroactive to that County building. Attorney Hawkins stated it is a question of at what point do they have a vested right to continue with their building. There is case law that they have to have started construction on site, but it is a Council decision as to how strongly they feel on this issue. It was agreed the Fire Department and the Building Official will research the open questions and the item will be placed on the October 7 Council agenda. DISEASED ELM TREES Council reviewed the September 16,1986, Request for Action where Ray Sowada asked for Council action regarding the removal of diseased elm trees being brought to the property of 160 Andover Boulevard. Council directed the City Attorney to proceed with prosecution for violation of the City's ordinance regarding diseased trees. Regular City Council Meeting September 16, 1986 - Minutes Page 7 AVFD REPORT Chief Palmer reported General will be coming out in a week and a half to look at the paint on one of the trucks. Also, LaVern is supposed to be working on the one truck this evening. Chief Palmer aksed if the City employee policies which are adopted also apply to the Fire Department. Council felt each policy in question should be determined individually, asking that specific policies of concern be listed for consideration. CABLE COMMISSION Mayor Windschitl noted there is an opening on the Cable Commission, asking for recommendations. Council agreed to give the item further thought and to place it on the October 7 Agenda for further consideration. TONSEN TIRE OPERATION Councilman Elling noted the violations of the Special Use Permit and County license by the Tonsen tire operation on Bunker Lake Boulevard. There is a meeting of the Environmental Sciences on the 25th, and they will be recommending to the Board prosecution of waste recycling because of no licensing, prosecution of Tonsen for receiving and disposing of tires, and prosecution of LaPanta for both violations. The PCA has rejected LaPanta's plan and has rewritten a plan where all tires would be gone within three years. Council generally agreed that given the noted violations the Special Use Permit should be revoked. This item was tabled to allow the Attorney to research the appropriate procedure to revoke a Special Use Permit. (That action was taken later in the meeting.) COON CREEK WATERSHED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Council asked that additional copies of the plan be obtained so everyone has a chance to review it. HIGHWAY 47 DESIGNATION CHANGE Council noted the request of the City of St. Francis for a designated change on Highway 47. The Staff was asked to research the specific request and to determine what, if any, impact it would have on the City of Andover. COMPUTER Councilman Lachinski stated he has almost completed writing the specifications for a computer system for the City. Once it is completed, he will have the item placed on the Agenda for Council comment. CONROY ASSESSMENT SPLIT Attorney Hawkins noted his opinion that the County does not have the authority to split that land without going through the City's Lot Split Ordinance procedure. He has discussed the item with the County Auditor's office. The property did go tax forfeit, therefore is owned by the State. Mrs. Conroy is asking to repurchase the house and to add the tennis court to make it more marketable. In order to do that, the County has to get the approval of the State. The attorney for the State has told him they had a simi1iar application before and they would not approve such a sp 1 it. Also, since Andover wouldn't give the assessment split for that parcel, the County cannot come up with a cost to be factored in the cost for repurchase. So it appears the issue is in limbo right now. Regular City Council Meeting September 16, 1986 - Minutes Page 8 (Conroy Assessment Split, Continued) Council questioned what has taken place regarding the City's desire to acquire the right of way through that prq:¡erty for the prq:¡osed realignment of Crosstown/ Crooked Lake Boulevard. Staff was asked to research the motion made on the issue and to be sure the City has the needed ri ght of way for that proposed road. TYPICAL SECTION/133RD AVENUE MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we approve Alternate No.3 prepared by Jlm Schrantz dated 9-16-86 for 133rd Avenue which shows a 40-foot right of way with 22-foot paved road section and a 35-foot building setback from the right of way line. Motion carried unanimously. Council also directed that the Engineering Technician draft a sidewalk policy for the City. APPROVAL TO WIRE FUNDS Mayor Windschit1 suggested ,a motion authorizing staff to wire funds but to do it under two signatures, suggesting Jim Schrantz and Shirley Clinton. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, to so move. Motion carried unanimously. RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION - 85-8/GREEN MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Elling, that the Council approve easement acquisition ln the amount of $3,591 for the Green property on Bunker Lake Boulevard and Coon Creek. Motion carried unanimously. PARK ORDINANCE/HOURS MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Knight, that we refer the matter of park hours to the Park Board and specifically with materials from the nuisance that we've had in the Red Oaks park. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE STREET SPECIFICATIONS MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Orttel, to continue this to the next meeting. Moti on carried unanimously. AWARD SEALCOAT BID/86-23 MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that the Council reject bids for sea1coating for 1986 and have those funds carried over to 1987 to be applied to sea1coating for that year. Motion carried unanimously. $2,600,000 BOND SALE Attorney Hawkins advised that approximately 45 percent of the funds were to be for Project 86-3, and now it is uncertain how or when that project will be done. Nevertheless, funding is needed for several other projects. If contracts are not awarded until next spring, the project wouldn't be assessed until 1987, collected in 1988; but he still felt there should be sufficient funds to pay the debt service. Those funds will be left in the construction funds and any excess can be used to fund other projects. Attorney Hawkins noted the bond rating is BAAl for a IS-year bond. The three bids received were: 1) Piper, Jaffray and Hopwood, and others; bid price of $2,563,600, with total interest cost of $968,595 and net interest rate of 6.2189 percent; 2) First Bank of St. Paul and others; bid price of $2,564,380, total interest cost of $956,460 and net interest rate of 6.1409; and 3) Miller Securities and others; bid price of $2,556,034, total interest cost of $959,031, and net interest rate of 6.1575 percent. Regular City Council Meeting September 16, 1986 - Minutes Page 9 ($2,600,000 Bond Sale, Continued) MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Elling, introducing a Resolution awarding the sale of $2,600,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds series 86-B, fixing their form and specifications, directing their execution and delivery, and providing for their payment; that the sale would be awarded to the First Bank of St. Paul, a bid price of $2,564,380 with a total interest cost of $956,460, giving a net interest rate of 6.1409 percent. (See Resolution R153-86) Moti on carri ed unanimous 1y. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we approve Checks 11590 through 11647 for a total of $1,091,731.89. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Present (Orttel) vote. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we authorize the Mayor to sign a check for $500 forearnest money to Wally Laptuda for property purchase. Moti on carri ed unanimously. APPROVAL OF r1INUTES August 13, 1986: Correct as written. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Knight, to approve the Minutes of the Special Meetlng on August 13. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Present (Knight) vote. August 19 and 26, September 2, 1986: Correct as written. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we approve Minutes of August 19, 26, and September 2 Special and September 2 Regular Council Minutes. Moti on carr i ed unanimous 1y. August 27, 1986: Correct as written. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Orttel, to approve the Minutes of August 27. Motion carrled on a 4-Yes, I-Present (Windschit1) vote. August 21, 1986: Correct as written. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Lachinski, that we approve the Minutes of August 21, Specla1 Council Meeting. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Present (Knight) vote. TONSEN TIRE OPERATION, CONTINUED Attorney Hawkins reviewed the procedure for revoking a Special Use Permit by motion and setting the reasons out, notifying the parties involved who then have a right to ask for a public hearing within 10 days. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Ortte1, that we revoke the Special Use Permit for Tonsen, Inc., and LaPanta Junkyard License and direct Staff to prepare a letter directing the reasons for the revocation. (See Resolution RI54-86) Mot i on carried unanimously. MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Lachinski, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meetlng adjourned at 12:18 a.m. Respectfully submitted, OJ\þ~~ C~""\ -,;, (' ~ Mar lla A. Peach . Recor g Secretary