Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC June 17, 1986 CITY of ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING-JUNE 17, 1986-AGENDA 7:30 P.M. l. Call to Order 2. Agenda Approval 3. Resident Forum 4. Discussion Items a. Ordinance 8 Amendment b. Assemblies of God Church Variance c. Terry Hanson Special Use Permit d. Woodland Terrace 5th Addition preliminary plat e. Clyde Smith Sketch Plan f. Duerr Appraisal Report *g. Gerald Lazarz Variance h. 5. Non-Discussion Items a. Accept Feasibility Report/University Avenue b. Accept Feasibility Report/164th Lane/86-7 c. Accept Feasibility Report/154th Lane/86-l2 d. Award Contract/Hidden Creek 2nd/86-6 , e. Woodland Terrace 2nd Addition Final Plat , f. Woodland Terrace 3rd Addition Final Plat *g. Street Lights *h. Final payment/85-5 i. 6. Staff, Commission, Committee Reports a. Public Works Department l. Water Truck 2. Used Tractor 3. Storage Fence b. Park Board * c. Franklin Fund/City Attorney 7. Approval of Claims 8. Approval of Minutes 9 . Adjournment *Not on published agenda - " . CITY of ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 17, 1986 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Month1y Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschitl on June 17, 1986, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota; Councilmen present: Elling, Knight, Lachinski, Orttel Councilmen absent: None A 1so present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman, Don Jacobson; City Administrator, James Schrantz; and others RES IDENT FORU~1 Oon Jacobson - stated several months ago the Council denied a lot split on Andover Boulevard near University Extension. Today he noticed a bulldozer in there putting in a driveway going to the back of that lot. Council directed Mr. Schrantz to check into the matter tomorrow. Tim Casey, 3517 140th Lane, Northg1en - stated he and his neighbors are present to VOlce thelr Opposltlon to the proposed car wash for 140th and Round Lake Boulevard. They submitted a petition of opposition to the Planning and Zoning Commi ss i on. Council noted this item is on the agenda this evening. AGENDA APPROVAL The following additions to the agenda were agreed to: 4h, SW 28 Report; 4i, New Employees; 4j, 133rd; and 4k, Rum River Commercial Operation. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we accept the Agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE 8 AMENDMENT Chairman Jacobson reviewed the Commission's recommendation to approve the amendment to include craft and antique businesses in the R-4 distr.ict in buildings designated as a historical structure. He said there was no public input on the matter. I ¡ MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Elling, introducing an ordinance amending Ordinance No.8, Adopted the 31st Day of January, 1971, known as the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Andover as presented. Motion carried unanimously. ' ASSEMBLIES OF GOD CHURCH VARIANCE Chairman Jacobson reviewed the Commission's recommendation for approval of a variance on the size of a sign to be constructed by the Anoka Assemblies of God Church at 3120 Bunker Lake Boulevard. There was no public opposition.¡ MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, a Resolution approving a variance for the construction of an identification sign in excess of the requirements for the Anoka Assemblies of God Church property described as PIN 32 32 24 41 0002 as submitted. (See Resolution R079-86) Motion carried unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting June 17, 1986 - Minutes Page 2 TERRY HANSON SPECIAL USE PERMIT Chairman Jacobson stated there was considerable publc input, all opposed, to the request by Terry Hanson to operate a car wash on Lot 1, Block 1, of the Andover Community Shopping Center. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the special use permit on a 4-2 vote. Chairman Jacobson stated the Commissioners felt there is a need for a car wash in the shopping center; but they felt that because of the proximity of the proposed location to the intersection and to the residential area, it would be better located at another location within the shopping center. Tim Casey - reviewed the petition submitted opposing the car was." proposal, noting the eight reasons why it should not be located on the proposed site. Steve Erickson, Soucy Architects, Eden Prairie, representing Terry Hanson from the Typhoon Car Wash, 7000 East River Road in Anoka - stated they deslgned the layout with a lO-foot setback to the north and a 3D-foot setback on the side. It wasn't until they were before the P & z that they were told of the changes in the setbacks. They have not redrawn the plans. Attorney Hawkins noted the setback requirement along residential areas is 35 feet. Mr. Erickson - stated they understand that now, but the original plat showed a setback of 10 feet, which is what they used. He stated they cannot get both phases of the project on the lot if they are required to maintain the 35-foot setback from the residential area. They would need to go back and recalculate the revenues, etc., on a smaller scale pl'oject. Terrr Hanson - stated with the 8-bay self service, the variance on the front was for 0 feet-because the setback was 30 feet rather than 40. At the last Planning Commission meeting, those setbacks were changed. Chairman Jacobson noted the request is for a special use permit and variances. Mr. Erickson - with this new understanding of the setbacks, they are really asking for varTãñèës on both sides of the building as well as the special use permit. Mel Kitzberger, 3548 141st Lane NW - stated they are asking to build within 10 feet of the property 11ne. The ordinance says 35 feet, asking who the Council is going to satisfy, the homeowners or the businessmen. Larr¥ VanHorn, 14058 Silverod Street NW - stated the car wash would bring in more traf ic. On a busy day, 700 to 800 cars go through Bill's Superette. A tunnel car wash can go through the same number of cars a day. He felt it is just too much traffic on 140th since that is one of the main roads into the Northglen Addition. Mr. Schrantz stated the Planning Commission asked the developer to reverse the plan thinking it may help the traffic situation, but the developer didn't care to do that. Mr. Erickson - stated they didn't opt to flip the plan because of the right and left turns. They didn't feel it would increase the number of cars they could stack on the lot. If the variance requests for setbacks are not approved, their option is to take off one set of tandems and slide the entire building back. But that would sti 11 leave onlya 2.5.foot setback to the north. To get the 35-foot setback, they would have to either take Phase 2 or four revenue bays off. But there is no way they can take out four bays and make the project financially feasible. They are proposing 8 self-serve coin-operated bays for Phase 1, and an automatic tunnel for Phase 2. He also explained their proposal for stacking cars on the lot. At peak service, the self-service would be about 25 cars per hour, estimating the maximum number of cars on their best days to be about 300 to 400 for an 8-bay service. The tunnel car wash would do between 60 and 80 cars an hour on a very good day. But that doesn't happen on a frequent basis. Regular City Council Meeting June 17, 1986 - Minutes Page 3 (Terry Hanson Special Use Permit, Continued) Mr. Hanson - believed they have enough room for stacking on the lot. Councilman Knlght felt the lot isn't big enough to do what they are proposing. Mr. Erickson - felt it is ã good layout, but the 35-foot setback will cause a problem. If they have to drop to a four-bay, it will no longer be a profitable project. Councilman Elling asked if there are any future plans for gas storage facilities. Mr. Erickson - stated no, that the contract agreement to buy the land specifically states they are not to have gas pumps. Mr. Kitzberyer - stated they were asked to do an EIS study, which has not been done. He a so asked what is to keep the ice from cars coming out of the car wash from backing down to his yard. Celine Norman, 3503 140th Lane NW - stated she is four doors down from the proposed car wash. If the people come in off Round Lake Boulevard, they will come down to her house and will have to turn around using her driveway, noting the stacking problem at the Northtown car wash. She didn't like the idea of these people turning around on her driveway. Mr. Kitzberger - asked what will the business do to the value of his house and property, feeling it wouldn't raise it any. Ms. Norman - stated their main concern is the traffic and the dangerous situation at the lntersection, noting their concern for the safety of their children. There are at least six buses that stop at that intersection each day. Mr. Kitzberger - stûted the cars come out of the car wash dripping wet. The water wl11 e on the street creating a slippery condition. Mayor Windschitl asked Mr. Schrantz to check with the bus company to see why the buses aren't going into the subdivision and what can be done. Ms. Norman - stated the children also play in the streets because there are no sldewalks, etc. Council discussed the proposal with Mr. Erickson and Mr. Hanson. Councilman Lachinski felt they were underestimating the amount of business that a car wash will get, stating there is a great need in this area for such a business. He felt more stacking is necessary. He also preferred just the automatic tunnel to the self-serve bays. But he too felt there is too much plan for this parcel. Mr. Erickson - stated they can stack 20 cars on the lot. They also feel most of the ice from dripping cars will be limited to their lot and not out on the street. They will also have a privacy fence on the north side as well as the east side. Council also discussed other possible uses allowed for this lot. Mr. Kitzberger - stated they are not opposed to all businesses, feeling a medical bUl Idlng would be fine. But he did not favor a business where he is going to hear car doors slamming, overhead doors, etc., nine yards from his house from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Mr. Hanson - stated the proposal would be to operate the self-serve from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. and the tunnel wash from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Council then discussed the variance·requests. Mr. Schrantz reviewed the setbacks required of the 35-foot buffer around the residents and the 20-foot setback inside the right of way. That makes the usable portion of this lot quite small. Regular City Council Meeting June 17, 1986 - Minutes Page 4 (Terry Hanson Special Use Permit, Continued) Wayne Anderson - stated they didn't anticipate the setback change when they sold the property. He and Mr. Rademacher looked at it; and no matter what is built, the setbacks hinder them. He stated they would have platted the property differently if they had been made aware of the setbacks in that area. The preliminary plat was drawn to and shows 10-foot setbacks, and the City approved it. After some discussion, the Council generally agreed that the 35-foot setback from the residential area should be maintained. Mr. Schrantz stated the driveway is proposed right to the property line, and the code requires 20 feet of landscaping plus the IS-foot boulevard. Mr. Erickson - stated they are not parking cars. They have 19 feet of green space, WhlCh is the boulevard and is dupliaating what Bill's Superette has directly across the street. They need to use that as their entrance. Council then discussed the front-yard setback, noting the difficulty of trying to get the proposal on the parcel. It was generally agreed to deny the variance requests to vary from the setback requirements. It was also noted if the special use permit was denied, the developers could not come back with the proposal for a minimum of one year. Council asked if the developers wanted to look at the proposal again in light of the Council's decision not to grant the setback variances. Mr. Hanson - asked that the request be held so they can try to revise it to work within the limits. MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Knight, that we table the Special Use Permit request of Terry Hanson for the car wash proposal in the Andover Center property until the first meeting in July. DISCUSSION: Mr. Kitzberger - asked is there anything that says he does not have to do an EIS as to nOlse, exhaust, etc., that close to a residential area. Attorney Hawkins stated there is no requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement on car washes at this time. That is governed by State law. Mr. Norman - asked when this will be heard again. Mayor Windschitl stated it wl1l be on the July 1 agenda. Motion carried unanimously. WOODLAND TERRACE 5TH ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Jacobson reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of the Woodland Terrace 5th Addition preliminary plat, noting there was no public input and the Park Board has agreed to cash in lieu of land. He noted the Commission also indicated the road to access to the plat should be blacktopped. Mayor Windschitl stated the public hearing for that has already been held. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, a Resolution approving the preliminary plat of Woodland Terrace'5th Addition being developed by Lawrence B. Carlson in Section 32 32 24 with 'another WHEREAS added that the escrow amount be paid. (See Reso 1 utton RD80-86) Motion carried unanimously. CLYDE SMITH SKETCH PLAN Larry Stenquist, 4401 158th Avenue, representing Clyde Smith - explained a proposed sketch plan of approximately 11 acres just off 159th Avenue into four lots. He noted the river lot does not meet the ordinance requirement of four acres. If the frontage requirements could be varied on the other lot, then the river lot could be made to four acres. Regular City Council Meeting June 17, 1986 - Minutes Page 5 (Clyde Smith Sketch Plan, Continued) Council preferred the river lot meet the four-acre requirement and had no problem varying from the front footage on the other lots to create the four-acre lot. Council discussed the possibility of paving 159th in front of the proposed lots. Mr. Stenquist - didn't feel the owenr can afford to do that. There are large parcels on ttie other side of the street. He asked the status of Roanoke. Mr. Schrantz stated it is a trespassed road. Whatever is maintained belongs to the City plus there is some dedication on a part of it. Council also noted the proper street dedication needs to be taken for 159th. Mr. Stenquist - stated on the northeast corner of the parcel are two government lot survey corners, one county and one state monument. He has not been able to get title insurance on the property because nobody knows where the corner is. He asked if the City can do anything to decide which monument to use. Mr. Schrantz stated he should check with the county surveyor who makes that decision. The City accepts their corners. Council gave conceptual approval, agreeing· to vary on lot width frontages in order to create a four-acre lot a10ng the river. DUERR APPRAISAL REPORT Mr. Schrantz stated he was waiting for the plans from TKDA. Mr. Hawkins stated the deed for the easement has been recorded; so if the easement is not needed, the City would need to vacate it. Otherwise, the easement must be paid for. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, to·tab1e this item. Motion carried unanlmous ly. GERALD LAZARZ VARIANCE Mr. Jacobson reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation ·to approve the variance request to vary from the platting process to move a property line between two lots. This is simi liar to what 'was done when lot lines were moved on South Coon Creek Drive. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, a Resolution approving a variance requested by Gerald Lazarz to waive the platting requirements for the properties described as PIN 17 32 24 34 0002 and PIN 17 32 24 34 0003 subject to the proper legals being brought back to the City Attorney or City Administrator. (See Resolution R081-86) Motion carried unanimously. SW 28 REPORT Mr. Schrantz reported that today representatives from the SW 28 group presented their recommendations for remedial action on the landfill and hazardous waste pit. It is his understanding that the report says to do nothing but· cap the landfill. The PCA and EPA have 21 days to respond to the report. They want to call off the meeting scheduled for June 23 and hope the city would proceed through the public input portion of the process. Mr. Schrantz also reported when they were excavating to determine the contents of the hazardous waste pit, they uncovered some plastic drums which they had not expected. So they closed the pit back up. They say the pollutants are moving toward Coon Creek but that technically the water in Coon Creek is acceptable for drinking purposes. Regular City Council Meeting June 17, 1986 - Minutes Page 6 (SW 28 Report, Continued) MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that the Council not meet with the SW 28 Group on June 23 and reschedule it for a later time. Motion carried unanimously. NEW EMPLOYEES Mr. Schrantz explained he advertised and interviewed for two positions in the office, an Engineering Secretary and a Receptionist/Secretary. He stated he has not yet written job descriptions for those positions, but the intent is to promote Ms. Vo1k to Deputy Clerk and to hire two more staff. He stated legally the positions of Clerk and Treasurer can be separated, stating he will get copies of that legislation for the Council. Ultimately he believes Ms. Vo1k could be trained for the Clerk position and Ms. Clinton for the Treasurer's position. Mr. Schnantz recommended Helena Griffey for the Secretary/Receptionist position at a maximum of $5.30/hour. He also recommended Sandra Hughes for the Engineering Secretary position at a salary not to exceed $6.50. Mayor Windschit1 was concerned that the structure and jOb descriptions have not yet been laid out or approved. He had no problem getting the help needed in the office but felt it needed to be done on an organized basis. Other Councilmen recognized the need for help in the office as soon as possible, suggesting those recommended be hired at this time and that:job descriptions and an organizational structure be submitted for approval as soon as possible. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Ortte1, that we authorize the City Administrator to nTre Sandra Hughes providing the references check out to his satisfaction for the Clerk II position at a salary not to exceed $6 per hour. DISCUSSION: Th ere was some concern as to the typing skills of the applicant, stressing the importance of accuracy. There is a probationary period of 3 to 6 months at which time there would be a probationary increase following a satisfactory review. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Lachinski, that the City hire a Receptionist subject to adequate references, one Helena Griffey, salary not to exceed $5.30 per hour. r~otion carried unanimously. FEASIBILITY REPORT/164TH LANE/86-7 Glen Cook of BRA reported the feasibility report is basically the same as the last time th i s was petIti oned for. The estimated cost is $41,890. MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Knight, receiving feasibility report and calling pub11C hearing on improvement of streets, Project No. 86-7 in the 164th Lane Area and schedule the public hearing for July 17. (See Resolution R082-86) Motion carried unanimously. ACCEPT FEASIBILITY REPORT/154TH LANE/86-12 Mr. Cook explained the project is divided into two parts. There are three lots on either side of 154th Lane, but there is a question as to wheter the center lot is buiJdaIJle. Council discussed the lot frontages, questioning whether the small lot that fronts on Nightingale would be assessable. It was generally felt in this instance it would be more fair to assess on a front-footage basis rather than on a unit basis. The engineers were also asked to research the assessment policy regarding the corner lot on Nightingale as to whether or not it would receive an assessment. Regular City Council Meeting June 17, 1986 - Minutes Page 7 (Accept Feasibility Report/154th Lane/86-12, Continued) MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, a Resolution declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility report for the impl'ovement of streets, Project No. 86-12, in the Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition area. (See Resolution R083-86 ) Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Crttel, Seconded by Ellin~, a Resolution receiving feasibility report and calling public hearing on improve!TIent of streets, Projèct No. 86-12 in the 154th Lane area west of Nightingale Street and Nightingale Estates 3rd Addition, setting public hearing for July 17. (See Resolution R084-86) Motion carried unanimously. FRANKLIN FUND/GINNIE t1AE INVESTMENTS Rand Winspear of Juran & Moody, Inc. , - provided a portfolio noting the aspects of safety for investing in Ginnie Mae funds and reviewed his background in municipal investments. He explained safety is first and foremost when selecting investments. A Ginnie Mae is a direct obligation of the Federal 90vernment, is guaranteed, and has become a popular investment alternative for municipal govern- ments. A month~y cash flow sheet is provided. The rate of return on a $1 million purchase is about 12 percent on a compounding basis. He felt on a $7.5 million portfolio, the City should be able to invest at least $1 million on a long term basis. The funds are properly collateralized and are highly regulated. The assets are held in safe keeping and registered in the name of the government security fund. The Bank of America holds the assets in a custodial account. The fund is a separate entity which manages the portfolios of the Ginnie Maes. They do not actually take physical possession of those securities. Mr. Winspear went on to explain how the portfolio is affected by changes in the interest rates of home mortgages, but stressed the safety of the investment in the Franklin Fund, which is a very large and diversified fund, there has only been one dividend adjustment. He also explained the differences between front load, end load, and no load funds. When investing in the Franklin Fund, there is a 1 percent load built··into the cost of the share. The 11.5 percent yield includes the 1 percent load on the City's investment which goes to the management company and some paid back to him. In looking at the various management companies available, it was his opinion that the Franklin Fund is the most suitable investment alternative for cities. Mr. Winspear also advised that this should be considered a long-term investment, that it be left in the fund for a minimum of 12 months. There is no risk against default, as it is a 100 percent security fund. The Franklin Fund offers the highest yield currently available to the City and it is highly 1iquidable. Mayor Windschit1 was concerned about the risk with the principal in a volatile market. Mr. Winspear explained if the interest rates go up, the value of the City's investment will go down; but if the interest rates go down, the value of the investment wi 11 go up. Because it is a long-term investment and there should be no eminent need for those funds, the City would not sell their security in an adverse market. The net asset value, which is adjusted to the market eadh day, fluctuates; and the City should be able to ride with any market movement. Also, the payback of mortgages does not affect the net asset value, only the dividends. Council made no decision at this time, wanting to ,study the information given on the fund. Council recessed at 10:25; reconvened at 10:30 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting June 17, 1986 - Minutes Page 8 WOODLAND TERRACE 2NO AND 3RD ADDITIONS/FINAL PLATS MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, a Resolution approving the final plat of Woodland Terrace 2nd Additton as being developed by Lawrence B. Carlson in Section 32, subject to the escrows, development contract, and proper title opinion. (See Resolution R085-86) Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Orttel, a Resolution approving the final plat of Woodland Terrace 3rd Addition as being developed by Lawrence B. Carlson in Section 32, as presented subject to escrows and title opinion. (See Resolution R086-86) Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (Water Truck, Used Tractor, Storage Fence) Frank Stone, Public Works Supervisor, reviewed the bid for a water truck from Boyer Ford for $24,500. He estimated it would cost another $4,000 to install a meta 1 tank. He did not get a quote for a stainless steel tank. Council discussed the proposal, the need for a water trucR~, and the question of financing. It was generally felt a stainless steel tank would be preferable. Council asked that Mr. Stone submit a total package for the next Council meeting. Mr. Stone asked for autho~ization to spend about $1,000 to purchase a used tractor from a farm equipment auction. He felt he would be able to get a tractor to be used for mowing. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we authorize Frank (Stone) to purchase a tractor at a cost not to exceed $1,800. noti on carried unanimous ly. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we authorize the D.~ H Fencing Company to put up a storage fence for a cost of $1,867 as submitted by Public Works. Motion carried unanimously. ANDOVER NEWS/KANO RADIO Charlie Veiman asked the Council's opinion of him doing a summary of what has taken place at the Council meetings to be aired on KANO radio. He felt it would provide more updated information for the residents. He also suggested it be noted in the newsletter that KANO will carry a summary of the Council meeting. Counci 1 agreed. 133RD AVENUE Mr. Schrantz reported Coon Rapids is moving their MSA designation from 131st to 133rd, which would be a border street with Andover. They also need that designation from Osage to Hanson Boulevard to terminate Osage. They would like Andover to designate their half of 133rd as MSA also. He stated he has told Good Value Homes that the City does not have the funds to construct 133rd as an MSA street. Council had some concern that designating Andover's half of 133rd as an MSA street actually penalizes the City in terms of needs, but the City wouldn't have to build the street either. It was agreed that Mayor Windschitl and Mr. Schrantz will meet with representatives from Coon Rapids on this matter. Regular City Council Meeting June 17, 1986 - Minutes Page 9 RUM RIVER COMMERCIAL OPERATION Council discussed the public hearing being held on a request of the Northstar Outdoor Education, Inc., tubin9 and canoeing operation to construct a building in the County park on the Rum River off Seventh Avenue. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, directing the staff to prepare a Resolution stating due to the ongoing problems of pollution and disorder involved with the tubing operation that have not been resolved, that the City of Andover go on record as being opposed to any increase in that use or continuance of that use until these issues have been resolved; and therefore be opposed to any construction in a park that would escalate or continue that use. And question the operation of a commercial business in a public park. (See Resolution R087-86) Motion carried unanimously. STREET LIGHTS Council agreed to install street lights at the following intersections: 1) County Road Seven and County Road 20 2) County Road 9 and County Road 20 north 3) Crosstown and South Coon Creek Drive 4) Hanson Boulevard and 161st (County Road 20) 5) Prairie Road and Andover Boulevard 6) County Road 16 and Hanson Boulevard 7) County Road 20 and County Road 9 south 8) Valley View Drive (County Road 58) and 165th 9) County Road 20 and Verdin 10) County Road 18 (Crosstown) and Andover Boulevard (County Road 16) FEASIBILITY REPORT/UNIVERSITY AVENUE Mr. Schrantz reported the City of Ham Lake has considered the problem on University Extension north of 177th and would just as soon proceed with an improvement project. Council noted the residents only want the road made passable and do not want it blacktopped and assessed. Discussion was on the proposal and alternatives to the problem. Mr. Schrantz was asked to obtain a quote from Burt Kraab1e as to how much it would cost to fill in the pothole in the road. He was: also asked to arrange a meeting with the Ham Lake Council to discuss this matter. FINAL PAYMENT/85-5 MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Orttel, a Resolution accepting work and directing 1ìñãì--payment to American Contracting for Project No. 85-5 for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm drain, and streets with concrete curb and gutter in the Woodland Terrace area subject to the owner's confirmation. (See Resolution R088-86) Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we approve Claims Numbers 11159 through 11230 in the amount of $143,178.71. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:54 p.m. ~~~ - Marc a A. Peac , Recording. Secretary